11118 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 40 / Wednesday, March 1, 1995 / Notices

(2) If it appears that the determination

complained of was based on a mistake

in the determination of facts not

previously considered; or

(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying

Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of

the law justified reconsideration of the

decision.

Investigation findings show that the

workers produce printed circuit boards.

The union claims that production is

being transferred to Mexico. The union

also claims that the production of GD

53s (radar assembles for aircraft) was

transferred to Taiwan.

The findings show that the subject

firm has been outsourcing a specific

type of circuit board production to

Mexico since 1992. The workers

affected by this shift of assembly work

were certified as eligible to apply for

TAA on December 4, 1993. The

certification (TA–W–27,877) expired on

December 4, 1994. No new production

has been transferred to Mexico.

Other circuit board production at

Utica has been affected by declines and

delays in Defense contracts regulating

from Defense spending cutbacks. The

subject firm has not lost bids to foreign

firms.

Also, a Taiwanese contract with the

subject firm called for the Utica plant to

co-produce with Taiwan and train

Taiwanese workers on the production of

the radar assembles for the Taiwanese

market. This contract actually had a

positive employment affect at Utica.

After a certain number of radar

assemblies were produced, the

production was transferred to Taiwan.

There were no imports of the radar

assemblies. Worker separations

resulting from a loss of production or

sales to the export market would not

form a basis for a worker group

certification.

Conclusion

After review of the application and

investigative findings, I conclude that

there has been no error or

misinterpretation of the law or of the

facts which would justify

reconsideration of the Department of

Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the

application is denied.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of

February 1995.

Victor J. Trunzo,

Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment

Services; Office of Trade Adjustment

Assistance.

[FR Doc. 95–5015 Filed 2–28–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

[TA–W–30,540]

National Ceramics, Inc. a/k/a Ceramic

Fashions, Cunningham, KY; Amended

Certification Regarding Eligibility To

Apply for Worker Adjustment

Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the

Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273) the

Department of Labor issued a

Certification of Eligibility to Apply for

Worker Adjustment Assistance on

January 10, 1995, applicable to all

workers of National Ceramics, Inc., in

Cunningham, Kentucky. The

certification notice was published in the

Federal Register on February 10, 1995

(60 FR 8062).

At the request of the State Agency, the

Department reviewed the certification

for workers of the subject firm. The

investigation findings show that some of

the claimants’ wages for National

Ceramics are being reported under

Ceramic Fashions.

Accordingly, the Department is

amending the certification to properly

reflect the correct worker group.

The intent of the Department’s

certification is to include all workers of

National Ceramics in Cunningham,

Kentucky irrespective to which account

their unemployment insurance (UI)

taxes are paid.

The amended notice applicable to

TA–W–30,540 is hereby issued as

follows:

‘‘All workers of National Ceramics, Inc., a/k/

a Ceramic Fashions, Cunningham, Kentucky

who became totally or partially separated

from employment on or after November 17,

1993 are eligible to apply for adjustment

assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act

of 1974.’’

Signed at Washington, D.C., this 21st day

of February 1995.

Victor J. Trunzo,

Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment

Services, Office of Trade Adjustment

Assistance.

[FR Doc. 95–5004 Filed 2–28–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

[TA–W–30,113]

Philips Lighting Richmond, KY;

Amended Certification Regarding

Eligibility To Apply for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the

Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273) the

Department of Labor issued a

Certification of Eligibility to Apply for

Worker Adjustment Assistance on

December 21, 1994, applicable to all

workers of Philips Lighting in

Richmond, Kentucky. The certification

notice was published in the Federal

Register on January 4, 1994 (60 FR 481).

At the request of the workers, the

Department reviewed the certification

for workers of the subject firm. New

findings show that some workers were

laid off just prior to the July 8, 1993

impact date set in the certification. The

Department can go back to April 1, 1993

in setting its impact date.

Accordingly, the Department is

amending the certification by deleting

the July 8, 1993 impact date and setting

a new impact date of April 1, 1993.

The intent of the Department’s

certification is to include all workers

who were adversely affected by

increased imports.

The amended notice applicable to

TA–W–30,113 is hereby issued as

follows:

‘‘All workers of Philips Lighting, Richmond,

Kentucky who became totally or partially

separated from employment on or after April

1, 1993 are eligible to apply for adjustment

assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act

of 1974.’’

Signed in Washington, D.C., this 22nd day

of February 1995.

Victor J. Trunzo,

Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment

Services, Office of Trade Adjustment

Assistance.

[FR Doc. 95–5008 Filed 2–28–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

[TA–W–30, 113]

Philips Lighting Company Richmond,

KY; Investigations Regarding

Certifications of Eligibility To Apply for

Worker Adjustment Assistance;

Correction

This notice corrects the notice for

petition TA–W–30–113 which was

published in the Federal Register on

August 8, 1994 (59 FR 40372) in FR

Document 94–19240.

This revises the date received and the

date of petition on the ninth line of the

third and fourth columns in the

appendix table on page 40372. The date

received and the date of petition should

both read ‘‘April 1, 1994’’ in the third

and fourth columns on the ninth line of

the appendix table.

Signed in Washington, D.C., this 22nd day

of February, 1995.

Victor J. Trunzo,

Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment

Services, Office of Trade Adjustment

Assistance.

[FR Doc. 95–5010 Filed 2–28–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M