alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OTR Express, Inc.
                                    804 N. Meadowbrook Dr. P.O. Box 2819       
                                    Page 1
                                    Olathe, KS 66063-0819

APPENDIX A TO "CARRIER/SHIPPER TRANSPORTATION CONTRACT"  or if OTR 
Express is operating as a common carrier because no contract exists 
between Shipper and OTR Express, the following shall be the applicable 
rates, rules & charges.
  
For:                                     Effective Date:


SCHEDULE OF RATES:
ORIGINATION                   DESTINATION    

(REFER TO PAGE 3)

RULES AND ACCESSORY CHARGES:
Mileage Calculations: Obtained from Rand-McNally - TDM MileMaker PC 
version of HHG Carrier's Bureau Mileage Guide #17 and subsequent 
versions thereof. Quoted mileages may change without notice upon 
adoption of subsequent versions.

Driver Loading/Unloading Charges: $85 minimum or all lumper charges. $25 
if the driver uses a pallet jack only 

Stop Off Charges: The charge for each pick-up and drop-off to partially 
load and unload exclusive of stops at point of origin and destination is 
$60 for the first, $70 for the second, and $85 for the third and each 
stop thereafter.

Minimum Charge: $585 per shipment exclusive of accessory charges. $300 
min charge for shipments that final within a 75 mi radius of KC,Mo, 
LA,Ca & SF,Ca or for shipments that originate in the state of Florida.

Excess Value: Carrier's max cargo liability per shipment is $500,000. 
For those shipments valued in excess of $500,000, Carrier is not liable 
to pay for a greater proportion of liability for loss or damage than 
$500,000 bears to 100% of the value of the goods.

Truck Ordered But Not Used: $50 if a truck order is canceled less than 6 
hours from scheduled loading appointment. If truck is already 
dispatched, $2.50 per mile from dispatch point to loading address with a 
$150 minimum and $400 maximum.

Detention: In lieu of any pre-agreement, no charge for the first 4 hrs, 
$50/hr thereafter.
Fuel Surcharge: Refer to Appendix B
Pallet Exchange: $8 per pallet
Team Service Required: $125

Reconsignment: Carrier is not obligated to divert/reconsign a shipment 
after commencing pick-up but will do so on a best efforts basis subject 
to a $100 charge. Additional miles shall be paid at the same per mile 
rate provided the final destination city does not change. If it does 
change, the rate per mile may change based on Carrier's prevailing 
rates.

P.O.D. Requests: $5 per receipt
C.O.D. Shipment: $75. Advance Shipper notification & written Carrier 
acceptance required.

Hazardous Material Loads: $.05 per mile for any shipment containing 
product deemed by the EPA to be hazardous and requiring haz-mat placards 
affixed to the truck.

Canadian Pick-ups & Deliveries: $.70 per mile for all miles in excess of 
a 125 mile radius of Vancouver,BC, Detroit and Toronto,ON.

Transportation In-Bond - $100, plus $60, $70 or $85 applicable stop off 
charge plus any additional miles at applicable rate if Carrier is 
required to stop at a custom's office en-route.

New York City Deliveries: - $175 for loads finaling in NYC, including 
Long Island and the five buroughs.
<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 46 (Thursday, March 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 12944]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5738]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-28-000]


Williams Natural Gas Co.; Notice of Technical Conference

March 3, 1995.
    In the Commission's order issued on November 30, 1994 in the above-
captioned proceeding, the Commission ordered that a technical 
conference is convened to resolve issues raised by the filing. The 
conference to address the issues has been scheduled for March 29, 1995, 
at 1:00 p.m. in a room to be designated at the offices of the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 810 First Street NE., Washington, DC, 
20426.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-5738 Filed 3-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 41 (Thursday, March 2, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 11698]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5320]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


Commodity Futures Trading Commission

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Tuesday, March 14, 1995.

PLACE: 2033 K St., NW., Washington, DC, 8th Floor Hearing Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Enforcement Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-254-6314.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 95-5320 Filed 2-28-95; 3:32 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
Motion s Granted; Appeal s Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 3,

2011

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 11

- 0 0 800

- CV NO. 14

- 11

- 00801

- CV

____________ SUSAN COMBS, COMPTROLLER, TEXAS HIGHER EDUCATION COORDINATING BOARD, RAYMUND PAREDES, COMMISSIONER, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, LONE STAR COLLEGE SYSTEMS AND RICHARD

CARPENTER, AND THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellant s

V.

IMMIGRATION REFORM COALITION OF TEXAS , Ap pellee

On Appeal from the 281st District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2009

- 79110



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Th ese are appeal s from a judgment signed August 22, 2011 . On October 27
, 2011 , the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal as moot

. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted.
Accordingly, the appeal s are ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Anderson and Christopher.
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual Balance 

in 75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

-2.00% -4.34% 1.45% 3.11% -0.56% -1.23%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2009 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary, Social Security

August 26, 2009

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Level of Monthly Benefits (PIA)

Proposed Provision: Multiply all PIA formula factors successively by 0.991 for new benefit eligibility in 

each year 2013 through 2041. Disabled workers and young survivors (surviving spouses with a child-incare and survivor children) would not be affected by this provision. Upon conversion from disabled worker 

to retired worker benefits, benefit levels would be proportionally reduced based on the fraction of years 

the individual was not disabled between ages 22 and 62.

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this provision

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Year

Percent

Cost rates with this provision

Cost rates under present law

Income rates with this provision

Income rates under present law

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

 (assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Year

Percent

Present law With this provision
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-50550

Summary Calendar

BERNICE MARIE DEROUEN,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

FALLS COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT;

RICKY SCAMAN, Deputy Sheriff, in his individual

and Official Capacities,

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:11-CV-138

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and HAYNES and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appellant Bernice Marie DeRouen (“DeRouen”) attempts to challenge the

district court’s dismissal for lack of jurisdiction of her § 1983 suit against a

deputy sheriff and “the Sheriff’s Department” of Falls County. The district court

dismissed because she has already pursued—and lost—exactly the same claim

in Texas state courts.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 15, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-50550 Document: 00511759821 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/15/2012
No. 11-50550

1. Under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, she may not continue to litigate

the claims by seeking review of the state courts’ decisions in federal court. The

district court correctly dismissed on this basis.1

2. Moreover, DeRouen’s initial brief on appeal utterly fails to address the

Rooker-Feldman doctrine, and she has therefore waived any argument based on

that doctrine. Brinkmann v. Dallas Cty. Dep. Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748

(5th Cir. 1987).

The appeal fails to raise an issue of arguable merits and is DISMISSED

as frivolous. See Fifth Circuit Rule 42.2.

Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 412, 44 S. Ct. 149 (1923); Dist. of Columbia Ct. 1

of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 103 S. Ct. 1303 (1983).

2

Case: 11-50550 Document: 00511759821 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/15/2012
Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Michael Bohm,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of American Skandia Life Assurance Corporation (the Company), hereby certify that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 23, 2007



/s/ Michael A. BohmName:

Michael A. BohmTitle:

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 37 (Friday, February 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 10384]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4511]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP94-425-004]


Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.; Notice of Filing

February 17, 1995.
    Take notice that on February 6, 1995, Tennessee Gas Pipeline 
Company (Tennessee) submits Substitute Tenth Revised Sheet No. 30 of 
its FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1 to be effective January 
1, 1995. On November 30, 1994, Tennessee filed Tenth Revised Sheet No. 
30 to reflect a revision to its Transportation Cost Rate Adjustment. 
Subsequently, Tennessee made a compliance filing on December 15, 1994, 
in Docket No. RP94-425, restating its GSR surcharge effective November 
1, 1994. In that filing Tennessee should have included an additional 
sheet No. 30 to be effective January 1, 1995 which would supersede the 
November 30th sheet and effectuate the reduced GSR surcharge. Tennessee 
is hereby effectuating the change to the reduced GSR surcharge.
    Tennessee states that copies of the filing are available for 
inspection at its principal place of business in the Tenneco Building, 
Houston, Texas, and have been mailed to affected parties.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol 
Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rule 211 of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). All 
such protests should be filed before February 27 1995. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Copies of the filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-4511 Filed 2-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-11479

Trio Engineered Products:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-1718

Titan Flow Control: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Lincare Holdings Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John P. Byrnes, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ JOHN P. BYRNESJohn P. Byrnes Chief Executive Officer


February 25, 2009
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3855 

To amend section 7014 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 

of 1965 to advance toward full Federal funding for impact aid, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 16, 2022 

Mr. LUJA ́N (for himself, Mr. INHOFE, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, and Mr. TILLIS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend section 7014 of the Elementary and Secondary 

Education Act of 1965 to advance toward full Federal 

funding for impact aid, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Advancing Toward Im5 pact Aid Full Funding Act of 2022’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO ESEA. 

7 Section 7014 of the Elementary and Secondary Edu8 cation Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7714) is amended by strikVerDate Sep 11 2014 19:58 Mar 17, 2022 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3855.IS S3855

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3855 IS

1 ing subsections (a) through (d) and inserting the fol2 lowing: 

3 ‘‘(a) PAYMENTS FOR FEDERAL ACQUISITION OF

4 REAL PROPERTY.—For the purpose of making payments 

5 under section 7002, there are authorized to be appro6 priated— 

7 ‘‘(1) $87,313,000 for fiscal year 2023; 

8 ‘‘(2) $98,313,000 for fiscal year 2024; 

9 ‘‘(3) $109,313,000 for fiscal year 2025; 

10 ‘‘(4) $120,313,000 for fiscal year 2026; and 

11 ‘‘(5) $131,313,000 for fiscal year 2027. 

12 ‘‘(b) BASIC SUPPORT PAYMENTS; PAYMENTS FOR

13 HEAVILY IMPACTED LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES.— 

14 For the purpose of making payments under section 

15 7003(b), there are authorized to be appropriated— 

16 ‘‘(1) $1,544,242,000 for fiscal year 2023; 

17 ‘‘(2) $1,734,242,000 for fiscal year 2024; 

18 ‘‘(3) $1,924,242,000 for fiscal year 2025; 

19 ‘‘(4) $2,114,242,000 for fiscal year 2026; and 

20 ‘‘(5) $2,304,242,000 for fiscal year 2027. 

21 ‘‘(c) PAYMENTS FOR CHILDREN WITH DISABIL22 ITIES.—For the purpose of making payments under sec23 tion 7003(d), there are authorized to be appropriated— 

24 ‘‘(1) $57,316,000 for fiscal year 2023; 

25 ‘‘(2) $66,316,000 for fiscal year 2024; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3855 IS

1 ‘‘(3) $75,316,000 for fiscal year 2025; 

2 ‘‘(4) $84,316,000 for fiscal year 2026; and 

3 ‘‘(5) $93,316,000 for fiscal year 2027. 

4 ‘‘(d) CONSTRUCTION PAYMENTS.—For the purpose 

5 of making payments under section 7007, there are author6 ized to be appropriated— 

7 ‘‘(1) $20,656,000 for fiscal year 2023; 

8 ‘‘(2) $23,906,000 for fiscal year 2024; 

9 ‘‘(3) $27,156,000 for fiscal year 2025; 

10 ‘‘(4) $30,406,000 for fiscal year 2026; and 

11 ‘‘(5) $33,656,000 for fiscal year 2027.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
*This matter is being decided by a quorum. 28 U.S.C. §

46(d).

 

** Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-20515

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CALVIN ALEXANDER,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-98-CR-29-ALL

- - - - - - - - - -

February 11, 1999

Before BARKSDALE and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.*

PER CURIAM:**

Calvin Alexander argues that the district court abused its

discretion in concluding that it lacked the authority to depart

downward in imposing his sentence.

We have reviewed the record, including the briefs of the

parties, and find that we do not have jurisdiction to review the

district court’s denial of Alexander’s motion to depart downward
No. 98-20515

-2-

at sentencing. The district court denied the motion based on its

determination that a departure is not warranted under the facts

of the case. Its decision was not based on the mistaken belief

that it did not have the authority to depart downward. 

Therefore, the district court’s decision is not subject to

review. See United States v. Palmer, 122 F.3d 215, 222 (5th Cir.

1997). The appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See

United States v. DiMarco, 46 F.3d 476, 478 (5th Cir. 1995).

APPEAL DISMISSED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Health Resources and Services Administration

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Anyone requiring information regarding the ACCV should contact Annie Herzog, DICP, HSB, HRSA, Room 8N146B, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857; telephone (301) 443-6593, or email:                         *aherzog@hrsa.gov.*

Jackie Painter,

Director, Division of the Executive Secretariat.

[FR Doc. 2016-03015 Filed 2-12-16; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4165-15-P
EXHIBIT
21.1  Subsidiaries
of the Registrant As of September 3,
2010  Parent
  
  Subsidiary
  
  Percentageof Ownership
  
  State of Incorporationor OrganizationHF Financial
  Corp.
  
  Home Federal
  Bank
  
  100%
  
  DelawareHF Financial
  Corp.
  
  HomeFirst Mortgage
  Corp.
  
  100%
  
  South DakotaHF Financial
  Corp.
  
  HF Financial
  Capital Trust III
  
  100%
  
  DelawareHF Financial
  Corp.
  
  HF Financial
  Capital Trust IV
  
  100%
  
  DelawareHF Financial
  Corp.
  
  HF Financial
  Capital Trust V
  
  100%
  
  DelawareHF Financial
  Corp.
  
  HF Financial
  Capital Trust VI
  
  100%
  
  DelawareHF Financial
  Corp.
  
  HF Financial
  Group, Inc.
  
  100%
  
  South DakotaHome Federal
  Bank
  
  Hometown
  Investment Services, Inc.
  
  100%
  
  South DakotaHome Federal
  Bank
  
  Mid-America
  Service Corporation
  
  100%
  
  South DakotaHome Federal
  Bank
  
  PMD, Inc.
  
  100%
  
  South DakotaHome Federal
  Bank
  
  Mid America
  Capital Services, Inc. d/b/a/Mid America Leasing
  
  100%
  
  South Dakota  The financial statements
of HF Financial Corp. are consolidated with those of its subsidiaries.