alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8440-8441]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3584]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
[AC-04; OTS No. 06998]


Pendleton Federal Savings and Loan Association, Falmouth, 
Kentucky; Approval of Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on January 26, 1995, the Deputy 
Assistant Director, [[Page 8441]] Corporate Activities, Office of 
Thrift Supervision, or her designee, acting pursuant to delegated 
authority, approved the application of Pendleton Federal Savings and 
Loan Association, Falmouth, Kentucky, to convert to the stock form of 
organization. Copies of the application are available for inspection at 
the Information Services Division, Office of Thrift Supervision, 1700 G 
Street NW., Washington, D.C. 20552, and the Central Regional Office, 
Office of Thrift Supervision, 111 East Wacker Drive, Suite 800, 
Chicago, Illinois 60601-4360.

    Dated: February 8, 1995.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Nadine Y. Washington,
Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-3584 Filed 2-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           9,417
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          18,128
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    215,430
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        782,040
<ALLOWANCE>                                     11,309
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,084,628
<DEPOSITS>                                     777,600
<SHORT-TERM>                                   151,173
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             10,039
<LONG-TERM>                                     63,416
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,256
<OTHER-SE>                                      46,644
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,084,628
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 18,983
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,744
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   110
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                21,837
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              10,620
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,358
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            7,479
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      468
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 195
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 14,746
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,423
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,423
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,338
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.07
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    9.11
<LOANS-NON>                                      5,494
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 2,900
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                11,114
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      582
<RECOVERIES>                                       309
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               11,309
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            11,309
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         11,309


</TABLE>
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 562 

To provide for a three-month extension of the Veterans Retraining Assistance 

Program administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2013 

Mr. MILLER of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide for a three-month extension of the Veterans Retraining Assistance Program administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘VRAP Extension Act 

5 of 2013’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 562 IH

1 SEC. 2. THREE-MONTH EXTENSION OF VETERANS RETRAIN2 ING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM. 

3 (a) EXTENSION.—Section 211 of the VOW to Hire 

4 Heroes Act of 2011 (Public Law 112–56; 125 Stat. 713; 

5 38 U.S.C. 4100 note) is amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (a)(2)(B), by striking ‘‘March 

7 31, 2014’’ and inserting ‘‘June 30, 2014’’; and 

8 (2) in subsection (k), by striking ‘‘March 31, 

9 2014’’ and inserting ‘‘June 30, 2014’’. 

10 (b) INTERIM REPORT.— 

11 (1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 30 

12 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 

13 Secretary of Veterans Affairs, in collaboration with 

14 the Secretary of Labor, shall submit to the appro15 priate committees of Congress an interim report on 

16 the retraining assistance provided under section 211 

17 of the VOW to Hire Heroes Act of 2011 (Public 

18 Law 112–56; 125 Stat. 713; 38 U.S.C. 4100 note). 

19 (2) ELEMENTS.—The report required by para20 graph (1) shall include the following: 

21 (A) The total number of— 

22 (i) eligible veterans who have partici23 pated in the program established under 

24 such section as of the date of the enact25 ment of this Act; and 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 562 IH

1 (ii) associates degrees or certificates 

2 awarded (or other similar evidence of the 

3 completion of the program of education or 

4 training earned) to veterans participating 

5 in the program established under such sec6 tion as of such date. 

7 (B) Data related to the employment status 

8 of eligible veterans who participated in such 

9 program. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, Chief Judge, United Sta tes District Court for 1 

### the District of Minnesota. 

### ___________ No. 96-1849

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * District of Minnesota. * Bernard Hawkins, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: July 26, 1996 Filed: November 12, 1996

___________ Before BEAM, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.

Be rnard Hawkins was charged with escaping from a communit y corrections center (a halfway house), in violati on of 18 U.S.C. § 751. He testified at trial that he left the halfway house out of fear for his life , bec ause he knew he was going to test positive for cocaine use an d anticipated being returned to prison, where he h ad previously been stabbed and assa ulted. The jury found Hawkins guilty, and the district court 1 sentenced him to 8 months in p rison. On appeal, Hawkins contends the district court erred in not g ranting him an acceptance-of-responsibility reduction under U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1. We affirm.

## -2- We r eview de novo the district court's application of section 3E1.1, United States v. Barri s , 46 F.3d 33, 35 (8th Cir. 1995) (per curiam), and for clear error its attendant factual findings, United State s v. Hawkins , 78 F.3d 348, 352 (8th Cir. 1996), petition for cert. fi led , (U.S. June 1, 1996) (No. 95-9212). We question whether Hawkins was eligible for an a cceptance-of-responsibility reduction, because by presenting a duress defense, he effectively sought to negate h is responsibility for leaving the halfway house. See United States v . Johnson , 956 F.2d 894, 904 (9th Cir. 1992); cf. United States v. Patterson , 885 F.2d 483 , 484 (8th Cir. 1989) (affirming district court's denial of § 3E1.1 reduction for defendan t convicted of unlawful possession of firearm where defendant insisted he carried firearm only for protection).

In any event, given the great deference accorded the district court, we conclude the court did not clearly err in finding Hawkins had not met his burden of cle arly demonstrating he had accepted responsibility. See U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1(a) & comment. (n.5); United State s v. Byrd , 76 F.3d 194, 196 (8th Cir. 1996) (discussing burden). Hawkins's voluntar y admission of the conduct comprising his offense of conviction does not aut omatically entitle him to the reduction, see Hawkins , 78 F.3d at 352, nor does his expression of regret a t sentenci ng, see United States v. Roggy , 76 F.3d 189, 194 (8th Cir.), cert. denied , 116 S. Ct. 1700 (1996). Further, Hawkins does not dispute the government gave him tw o opportunities before trial to enter into a plea agreement, and he has not pointed to any pre trial statements or conduct which would indicate he accepted responsibility. Se e U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1, comment. (n.2).

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

## -3- A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
### Proposed Provision: F6. Apply a separate 6.2 percent tax on investment income as defined in the Affordable Care Act (ACA), with unindexed thresholds as in the ACA ($200,000 for single filer, $250,000 for married filing jointly), starting in 2025. Proceeds go to the OASI and DI Trust Funds.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3872 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3872

   To clarify the jurisdiction of the Special Inspector General for 
               Pandemic Recovery, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 17, 2022

  Mr. Hawley introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To clarify the jurisdiction of the Special Inspector General for 
               Pandemic Recovery, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JURISDICTION OF THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR PANDEMIC 
              RECOVERY.

    Section 4018(c)(1) of the CARES Act (15 U.S.C. 9053(c)(1)) is 
amended by striking ``this Act'' each place that term appears and 
inserting ``this division''.

SEC. 2. APPROPRIATIONS.

    (a) In General.--In addition to amounts otherwise available, there 
is appropriated to the Special Inspector General for Pandemic Recovery, 
out of amounts in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, $25,000,000 
for each of fiscal years 2022 through 2025 to carry out the provisions 
of section 4018 of the CARES Act (15 U.S.C. 9053), as amended by 
section 1 of this Act.
    (b) Emergency Designation.--
            (1) In general.--The amounts appropriated under this 
        section are designated as an emergency requirement pursuant to 
        section 4(g) of the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 (2 
        U.S.C. 933(g)).
            (2) Designation in senate.--In the Senate, subparagraph (A) 
        is designated as an emergency requirement pursuant to section 
        4112(a) of H. Con. Res. 71 (115th Congress), the concurrent 
        resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2018.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-3 (No. 333-106608, No. 333-108924, No. 333-10754, No.
333-110752, No. 333-82496, No. 333-91225, No. 333-91235 and No. 333-17105) and
Form S-8 (No. 333-109595, No. 33-82410) of our report dated March 5, 2004
relating to the Consolidated Financial Statements of SpatiaLight, Inc., which
appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP

BDO Seidman, LLP

San Francisco, California
March 14, 2005
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the quarterly report of Golden State Vintners, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey B. O'Neill, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbannes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:

(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/JEFFREY B. O'NEILLJeffrey B. O'Neill
Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2002 |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                                                                                  |  | 

---

QuickLinks
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 20552 Summary Calendar

CHARLES E. LUSK , Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.
CARLISIETTA R. WARNER, Sergeant, O.B. Ellis I Unit; ALICIA SCOTT, Property Officer, O.B. Ellis I Unit,

Defendant s
- Appellee s

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:18

- CV

- 831

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, ELROD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
Charles E

. Lusk, Texas prisoner # 1964427 , has appealed the dismissal of his civil rights complaint

. This court “ must examine the basis of its jurisdiction, on its own motion, if necessary. ” Mosley v. Cozby , 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). A timely notice of appeal in a civil case is a j urisdictional prerequisite when , as here, the time limit is set by statute. See Hamer v.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set f orth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 25, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-20552 Document: 00514930141 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/25/2019No. 18

- 20552

2 Neighborhood Hous. Servs. of Chi cago , 138 S. Ct. 13, 17 (2017); Bowles v.
Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007); 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a).
Lusk had to file a notice of appeal within 30 days of entry of the judgment on May 8, 2018

. See § 2107(a); F ED

. R. A PP

. P. 4(a)(1)(A) . Because Lusk filed his notice of appeal no earlier than August 2, 2018, h is appeal is untimely, and this court lacks jurisdiction. See Hamer , 138 S. Ct. at 17 . The appeal is DISMISSED. Case: 18-20552 Document: 00514930141 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/25/2019
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent exce pt under t he limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir.l Rule 47.5.4. 

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

______________________ No. 98-60426

______________________ UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, Plaintiffs-Appellee Cross-Appellants, versus KING ENTERPRISES, INC., Defendant-Appellant Cross-Appellee.

___________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

(3:95-CV-184-S)

___________________________________________________________________ November 5, 1999 Before DUHÉ, 

### BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges: PER CURIAM: *


### AFFIRMED. See 5th Cir. Rule 47.6.
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Floyd C. Wilson, certify that:1. I have reviewed this interim report on Form 10-Q of Petrohawk EnergyCorporation (the Company);2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and we have;a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on ourevaluation; andc. Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors andthe audit committee of Company’s board of directors:a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:November 10, 2005                                      /s/ Floyd C. Wilson   Floyd C. Wilson        Chief Executive Officer and President
Exhibit 10.1


 


THE PROMISSORY NOTE TO WHICH THIS AMENDMENT NO.
1 (THE “AMENDMENT NO.1”) TO PROMISSORY NOTE RELATES (AS AMENDED BY
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1, THE “NOTE”) HAS NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE “SECURITIES
ACT”). THE NOTE HAS BEEN ACQUIRED FOR INVESTMENT ONLY AND MAY NOT BE SOLD, TRANSFERRED OR ASSIGNED IN THE ABSENCE OF REGISTRATION
OF THE RESALE THEREOF UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OR AN OPINION OF COUNSEL REASONABLY SATISFACTORY IN FORM, SCOPE AND SUBSTANCE TO THE MAKER
THAT SUCH REGISTRATION IS NOT REQUIRED.


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO PROMISSORY NOTE


 


	 	Dated as of December [•], 2022
	Principal Amount: Up to $[●]	New York, New York


 


MedTech Acquisition Corporation,
a Delaware corporation (the “Maker”), hereby amends its promissory note, dated as of [●] (the “Original
Note”), effective as of the date hereof, to delete and replace Section 1 of the Original Note in its entirety with the following:


 


1. Principal. The Payee shall be obligated to lend to the Maker
amounts up to the Maximum Principal Amount. The principal balance of this Note, as reflected on Schedule A hereto (such Schedule
to be updated from time to time by the Maker as amounts are borrowed from the Payee up to the Maximum Principal Amount), shall be repayable
on the date on which the Maker consummates a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization or similar
business combination with one or more businesses (the “Initial Business Combination”). No amount shall be due under
this Note if such Initial Business Combination is not consummated on or before the 24 month anniversary of the date of the completion
of the Maker’s initial public offering (“IPO”) or such extended date as provided in the Company’s Amended
and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended from time to time.


 


All of the other terms of
the Original Note remain unchanged and in effect.


 


[Remainder of page intentionally left blank.
Signature page follows.]


 



     


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the Maker, intending to be legally bound hereby, has caused this Amendment No. 1 to be duly executed by the undersigned as of the day
and year first above written.


 


	 	MEDTECH ACQUISITION CORPORATION
	 	 	 
	 	By:	 
	 	 	Name: 	Christopher C. Dewey
	 	 	Title:	Chief Executive Officer


 


[Signature Page – Amendment No. 1 to Promissory
Note]
### Proposed Provision: G2. Invest 40 percent of the OASI and DI Trust Fund reserves in equities (phased in 2024-2038), assuming an ultimate 4.8 percent annual real rate of return on equities.

back