alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 28 (Thursday, February 11, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 7377]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02944]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION


Audit Committee Sunshine Act Meeting

Time and Date: 1:30 p.m., Wednesday, February 17, 2016.

Place: NeighborWorks America--Gramlich Boardroom, 999 North Capitol 
Street NE., Washington, DC 20002.

Status: Open (with the exception of Executive Sessions).

Contact Person: Jeffrey Bryson, General Counsel/Secretary, (202) 760-
4101; <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#afc5cdddd6dcc0c1efc1d881c0ddc8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="96fcf4e4efe5f9f8d6f8e1b8f9e4f1">[email protected]</span></a>.

AGENDA: 

I. Call to Order
II. Status Update from the External Auditor
III. Executive Session with the External Auditor
IV. Executive Session with the Chief Audit Executive
V. Executive Session: Pending Litigation
VI. Internal Audit Reports with Management's Response
VII. Internal Audit Status Reports
VIII. Compliance Update
IX. OHTS Watch List Review
X. Adjournment

    The General Counsel of the Corporation has certified that in his 
opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4) 
permit closure of the following portions of this meeting:

<bullet> Executive Session with the External Auditor
<bullet> Executive Session with the Chief Audit Executive
<bullet> Executive Session--Pending Litigation

Jeffrey T. Bryson,
EVP & General Counsel/Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-02944 Filed 2-9-16; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 7570-02-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### In the Matter of Edward Garcia, Petitioner, v Raymond W. Kelly, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.

[772 NYS2d 816]

Determination of respondent Police Commissioner, dated April 9, 2002, which dismissed petitioner from his position as a police officer, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Robert Lippmann, J.], entered on or about November 27, 2002) dismissed, without costs.

Substantial evidence, including the testimony of a member of the field team working with petitioner in an undercover narcotics operation, established that petitioner engaged in serious misconduct relating to the disposition of drugs recovered in that operation. There is no basis for disturbing respondent’s determinations concerning credibility *(see Matter of Berenhaus v Ward,*70 NY2d 436, 443-444 [1987]).

The penalty of dismissal does not shock our sense of fairness *(see Matter of Kelly v Safir,*96 NY2d 32, 38 [2001]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Ellerin and Friedman, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to

to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of SAVVIS, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



|(a) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |     |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: October 31, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Philip J. Koen     
|                       |  |     |  | Philip J. Koen         
|                       |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
7630 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 29 / Friday, February 12, 2016 / Notices 

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 

AFFAIRS 

West Los Angeles VA Medical Center; 

Draft Master Plan 

AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs. 

ACTION: Notice—Correction. 

SUMMARY: On February 2, 2016, the 

Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) 

published a notice in the Federal 

Register announcing publication of the 

Draft Master Plan for the West Los 

Angeles Department of Veterans Affairs 

campus. That notice contained language 

that we are now clarifying. 

DATES: These corrections will be 

effective as of February 12, 2016. 

Correction 

The notice VA published in the 

Federal Register on February 2, 2016 

(81 FR 552), stated on page 5526, in the 

third column: 

‘‘The proposed timeline involves 

developing 60 units within the next 12 

months, 150 units over the next 24 to 30 

months, 280 units over the next 30 months, 

280 units over the next 4 to 5 years, and 430 

units over the next 6 to 10 years—all totaling 

1,200 units.’’ 

As a clarification, that sentence is 

being replaced with the following 

sentence: 

‘‘Specifically, after legislative enactment, 

the proposed timeline involves developing 

490 units within the first 30 months, 280 

additional units within 4 to 5 years, and 430 

additional units within 6 to 10 years—all 

totaling 1,200 units.’’ 

Dated: February 9, 2016. 

William F. Russo, 

Office of the General Counsel, US Department 

of Veterans Affairs. 

[FR Doc. 2016–02883 Filed 2–11–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8320–01–P 


asabaliauskas on DSK9F6TC42PROD with NOTICES2
#### THE WRIGHT COMPANY, Inc., v. T. A. GREEN et al.

(Filed 17 October, 1928.)

Account, Action on — Verification and Proof of Debt.

In an action upon account by a mercantile corporation, tbe verification of tbe complaint containing an itemized statement of goods sold and delivered, made by tbe secretary of tbe corporation, raises a prima facie case under tbe provisions of C. S., 1789.

Appeal by defendant, T. A. Green, from *Stack, J.,*at April Term, 1928, of New Hanover.

No error.

Action upon an account. The issue submitted to' the 'jury was answered as follows:

“In what amount, if any, is the defendant, T. A. Green, indebted to the plaintiff? Answer: $283.79, with interest from 23 September, 1926.”

From judgment on the verdict defendant appealed to the Supreme Court.

*Isaac 0. Wright for plaintiff.*

*Bryan & Campbell and George L. Peschau for*defendant:

*198Per Curiam.

We find no error on this appeal. The verification attached to the statement of account offered in evidence by the plaintiff is signed by the secretary and assistant treasurer of plaintiff, a corporation. He swears that the statement of account is just and true, and that the account is for goods sold and delivered by plaintiff to defendant. It does not appear therein that the verification is made solely from the books of plaintiff, and without personal knowledge of affiant. The items of the account appear from separate invoices attached to the statement. The verified itemized statement of account was properly admitted as prima facie evidence tending to sustain the allegation in the complaint that plaintiff sold and delivered to defendant the goods described therein, and that there is now due plaintiff by defendant the sum demanded. C. S., 1789.

Assignments of error based upon exceptions to the exclusion of oral evidence offered by defendant, and to the instructions of the court in the charge to the jury cannot be sustained. The relation of defendants, T. A. Green and Ira W. Hewitt, under the written agreement between them, with respect to the operation of the Wilmington Hotel, as correctly construed by the court, was that of partners. The judgment is affirmed. There is

No error.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 37 (Friday, February 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 10384]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4509]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP91-203-000, et al. (Phase II)]


Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.; Notice of Informal Settlement 
Conference

February 17, 1995.
    Take notice that an informal settlement conference will be convened 
in this proceeding on Friday, February 24, 1995, promptly at 10:00 
a.m., at the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 810 
First Street, N.E., Washington, DC, for the purpose of discussing the 
remaining PCB issues in the above-referenced docket.
    Any party, as defined by 18 CFR 385.102(c), or any participant as 
defined in 18 CFR 385.102(b), is invited to attend. Persons wishing to 
become a party must move to intervene and receive intervenor status 
pursuant to the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 385.214).
    For additional information, please contact Donald Williams (202) 
208-0743 or Dennis H. Melvin (202) 208-0042.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-4509 Filed 2-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
## Mr.R. B. kaol4y

county aulitor collln county MoKlnnoy , Toao

**DOOF a&:**  aplnlon loo. O-512 Ro: Should looal oc forolga oounty pay l 

### onotabl4oo

Sooo for l orrlng p rwooo for Sorolgn

WuntlO8? Tour roquoot for on oplnlon on the 4b0ro 1. ~-,;ototaa

quootlom bee bean roo4ltBd by thlo ofiloo. a0wt0 xii w0. 5, A0t0 0r **a+00na c4iba**  &alom, @hh kgioloturo, 6ootiou 17b, rood8 la part 40 tollwar

al oolultloorha-oln th4 

### l wntycuil0~0 80llcbd

### inthi0 **liot** 

### ~4 l **~p0ti40ka OIL**  the baoio of an annual 8alary, the atato of Taxes ohall not be ohargeb wlth 

### and rhall not pay my too or oommleolon to 8nfprwlnot ofrioor for 

### any

l 4rvi040 by him **periorm0a,** 

### ht l 0iu **0rri04r** oh411 b4 pa w th4 **40uty** out of th6 ~ri04r'O Salary Fmd, l UOh So48 and om0l~o4lon4 00 **u0tiia** othorwloo bo pal& him by 

### the Wats for 4uoh ooniwo.m a4 or0 

### ini~0i4a by th4 aomptr0l14r*o 0fri04 that Collin Count ho8 ‘a population or 46,180 lnhabltanto 

### l ooordlng to th4 **1**eat **F4aw01** 04~8~4, **tm4r0r4, kilrg**  one oi the oountieo In whioh ths oounty oirloiolo an 

### l ompwootod on the bsoio of on l aual 

### l

olory. Thlo Xhportwnt ho8 rooently held in 

### oplnlono Ro. O-133 4nd O-155 that when a oomtablo In on over oounty who 

### romalno on a foe boolo and who r4oslt40 a **aubp~em** of mother eoMty to k oemod ln hlo proolnot should, upon the roooipt 0r a propor oartirio4t4 rm the foreign oounty, bo paid out 0r the (2lri00r*4 fJ414ry Fund **0r** ills

notiv4 oounty. The ab0Wa4Otloned artlolo by 

### it8 tormo, provlU44 **that 411**  **Se88** 

### horotoforrpah by 

### thb Etato ai **Torso** ror Oarrio4a rondorod ior preolnct 

### orrlowa oholl 

### horooitorbe paid by the rounty out or tho.Mfloor~o

. Salery Fund.

In tinV of the io&41~ ot&ut40 4a4 4plolooa 

### roforrod to, you ore rsepootfuUy mltlo)d 

### Chat

- it lo the oplnlod of thio Departmeat that 4 oonetobls/

. - -

_ .

e, R, RF D44*14f, hroh 23, 

### 1939, -80 2

im 

### an ovu wanty who 

### rwdM on a iw bole orad who te04lvoo a 

### l

abpoona fr4m 

### anothor ooanty to b4 44rwd la hi0 gm4olnot, l honld apon th4 rwolpt of th4 propa 44Ttlflo4t4 srosl 4 hr4lgm 4orllIty, be 

## p4iaout OS $& oii14a~0 84lrry 

## Ma of go nmtito 

### l omy. mlotlngth4tth4 iorrg414g 4mw4ri yoarlnqairy,wo r4mlJi
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the annual
report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
   
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       4,265,615
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       3,911,510
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                             1,740,883
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 41,122,986
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      81,150,055
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        81,195,857
<LOANS>                                    294,489,126
<ALLOWANCE>                                    857,577
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             438,462,032
<DEPOSITS>                                 316,655,755
<SHORT-TERM>                                30,344,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          7,255,164
<LONG-TERM>                                 54,700,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,712
<OTHER-SE>                                  29,493,401
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             438,462,032
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             20,749,795
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            9,370,435
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            30,120,230
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          14,290,172
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,190,989
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       11,639,069
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  180,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             819,385
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             10,824,985
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,290,216
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   2,790,316
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,790,316
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.08
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.85
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,606,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   434,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               859,922
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  319,418
<RECOVERIES>                                    11,179
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              731,683
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            40,247
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        691,436
        
    


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 41 (Thursday, March 2, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 11689]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5163]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Research, Evaluation and Dissemination; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Research, Evaluation and 
Dissemination.
    Date and Time: March 20, 1995; 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; March 21, 
1995, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; March 22, 1995, 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Place: Rooms 880 and 1150, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Nora Sabelli, Program Director, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Room 855, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone (703) 306-1651.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate proposals and provide advice and 
recommendations as part of the selection process for proposals 
submitted to the Networking Infrastructure for Education Program.
    Reason for Closing: Because the proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with 
proposals, the meetings are closed to the public. These matters are 
within exemptions (4) and (6) of 5 U.S.C. 552(c), Government in the 
Sunshine Act.

    Dated: February 27, 1995.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-5163 Filed 3-1-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ANDCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Davi Skin,Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, to my knowledge, that:

(1)          the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Davi Skin, Inc. for the quarterended June 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB forthe quarter ended June 30, 2006, fairly presents in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Davi Skin, Inc.
| By:     |   | /s/Joseph Spellman           |   |
|---------|--------|------------------------------|--------|
| Name :  |   | Joseph Spellman              |
| Title : |   | Principal Executive Officer, |
|    |   | and Director                 |
| Date    |   | August 8, 2006               |
|    |   |                         |
| By:     |   | /s/Theodore Lanes            |   |
| Name :  |   | Theodore Lanes               |
| Title : |   | Chief Financial Officer      |
| Date    |   | August 8, 2006               |

 

----
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3808 

To reauthorize certain leasing on the Outer Continental shelf, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 10 (legislative day, MARCH 7), 2022 

Mrs. GILLIBRAND introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To reauthorize certain leasing on the Outer Continental shelf, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Restoring Offshore 

5 Wind Opportunities Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LEASING ON THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF. 

7 (a) LEASING AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of the 

8 Interior is authorized to grant leases pursuant to section 

9 8(p)(1)(C) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 

10 U.S.C. 1337(p)(1)(C)) in the areas withdrawn by the 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3808 IS

1 Presidential Memorandum entitled ‘‘Memorandum on the 

2 Withdrawal of Certain Areas of the United States Outer 

3 Continental Shelf from Leasing Disposition’’ (issued Sep4 tember 8, 2020) and the Presidential Memorandum enti5 tled ‘‘Presidential Determination on the Withdrawal of 

6 Certain Areas of the United States Outer Continental 

7 Shelf from Leasing Disposition’’ (issued September 25, 

8 2020). 

9 (b) WITHDRAWALS.—Any Presidential withdrawal of 

10 an area of the Outer Continental Shelf from leasing under 

11 section 12(a) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act 

12 (43 U.S.C. 1341(a)) issued after the date of enactment 

13 of this Act shall apply only to leasing authorized under 

14 subsections (a) and (i) of section 8 of the Outer Conti15 nental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1337(a) and 1337(i)), 

16 unless otherwise specified. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 4448

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
RANDY L. ROHRBAUGH , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Elkins

. Thomas S. Kleeh, Chief District Judge. ( 2:06

- cr - 00019

- TSK

- MJA

- 1 )

Submitted : February 16, 2023 Decided: February 21, 2023

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, RUSHING , Circuit Judge , and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

ON BRIEF: Richard W. Weston, WESTON ROBERTSON , Hurricane, West Virginia, for Appellant. William Ihlenfeld, United States Attorney, Wh eeling, West Virginia, Christopher L. Bauer, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-4448 Doc: 25 Filed: 02/21/2023 Pg: 1 of 32 PER CURIAM: Randy L. Rohrbaugh seeks to appeal the district court’s judgment revoking his supervised release and sentencing him to 14 months’ imprisonment. The Government
asserts that the appeal i s untimely and should be dismissed. In criminal cases, the defendant must file the no tice of appeal within 14 days after the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A). With or without a motion, upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause, the district court may grant an extension of up to 30 days to file a notice of appeal. Fe d. R. App. P. 4(b)(4). Although the appeal period in a criminal case is not a jurisdictional provision, but rather a claim

- processing rule, United States v. Urutyan , 564 F.3d 679, 685 (4th Cir. 2009), “[w]hen the Government promptly invokes the rule in re sponse to a late

- filed criminal appeal, we must dismiss,”
United States v. Oliver , 878 F.3d 120, 123 (4th Cir. 2017) ; see United States v. Hyman , 884 F.3d 496, 500 (4th Cir. 2018). The district court entered judgment on May 26, 2022. Rohrbaugh filed the notice of appeal on August 8, 2022. * Because Rohrbaugh failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension of the appeal period and the Government has promptly invoked the appeal’s untimeliness, we dismiss the appeal. We dispens e with oral argument because

* For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the postmark date appearing on the envelope containing the notice of appeal is the earliest date Rohrbaugh could have delivered the notice to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. A pp. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988). USCA4 Appeal: 22-4448 Doc: 25 Filed: 02/21/2023 Pg: 2 of 33 the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 22-4448 Doc: 25 Filed: 02/21/2023 Pg: 3 of 3