alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
August 31, 2016

In accordance with the enclosed Opinion, below is the judgment in the numbered cause set out herein to be entered in the Minutes of this Court as of the 31st day of August, 2016.

10-14-00385-CV	MARK KEN TAFEL v. THE STATE OF TEXAS - ON APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF HAMILTON COUNTY - TRIAL COURT NO. 15292 – AFFIRMED - Opinion by Justice Scoggins:

	“This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record, and the same being considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the judgment of the court below; it is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the court below be, and hereby is, affirmed.  It is further ordered that appellant pay all costs in this behalf expended, and that this decision be certified below for observance.”

# image1.png
EXHIBIT 24

USFreightways Corporation

Power of Attorney

      The undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Christopher L. Ellis,
Robert S. Owen and Richard C. Pagano, or each of them, my true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution, to execute on my
behalf, individually and in all capacities as an officer or director of
USFreightways Corporation, an Annual Report on Form 10-K, and all amendments
thereto, for the year ended December 31, 2001, and to file the same, with all
exhibits thereto and any other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and
agents full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite and necessary to be done to comply with all requirements of the
Securities and Exchange Commission, as fully and to all intents and purposes as
each might or could do in person, and the undersigned hereby ratifies and
confirms each act that said attorneys-in-fact and agents may lawfully do or
cause to be done by virtue thereof.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this power of attorney on
the 14th day of February, 2002.

Signatures                          Title
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
/s/ SAMUEL K. SKINNER               Chairman of the Board, President and
                                    Chief Executive Officer and Director
/s/ ROBERT V. DELANEY               Director
/s/ MORLEY KOFFMAN                  Director
/s/ ANTHONY J. PAONI                Director
/s/ JOHN W. PUTH                    Director
/s/ NEIL A. SPRINGER                Director
/s/ STEPHEN B. TIMBERS              Director
/s/ WILLIAM N. WEAVER, JR.          Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          12,499
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   62,851
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,335
<INVENTORY>                                      9,487
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                92,619
<PP&E>                                           5,566
<DEPRECIATION>                                     768
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 251,833
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          118,849
<BONDS>                                         57,313
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           254
<OTHER-SE>                                      56,199
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   251,833
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               266,729
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   84,885
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               170,265
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 837
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,510
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,924
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,586
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,586
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.12
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION**
 
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Industrial Enterprises of America, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the "Form 10-QSB/A") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-QSB/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-QSB/A.
 
 
 
 Dated: January 21, 2005
 
 /s/ Crawford Shaw
 Crawford Shaw, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board and President
 
 
 
 
 The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB/A or as a separate disclosure document.
#### STATE v. R. C. SMITH.

(Filed 27 January, 1937.)

1. Constitutional law § 6c — Supreme Court will dismiss action in exercise of supervisory power when warrant fails to charge offense for which defendant was tried.

Defendant was tried for the violation of an ordinance upon a warrant which was insufficient to charge the offense. An appeal was taken to test the constitutionality of the ordinance. *Held:*The Supreme Court will not decide the constitutional question sought to be presented, but will dismiss the action in the exercise of its supervisory power over proceedings of lower courts.

2. Constitutional Law § 6b—

The constitutionality of an ordinance will not be decided upon an appeal from a conviction obtained upon an invalid warrant, since the appeal does not properly invoke the exercise of the judicial power.

Appeal by defendant from *Harris, J.,*at September Special Term, 1936, of Guilbobd.

Criminal prosecution tried upon warrant charging defendant with violation of traffic ordinance of city of Greensboro, to wit, “park taxi in block with more than two others.”

*207The ordinance alleged to Rave Reen violated provides tRat “Riot more tRan two taxicabs owned Ry tRe same company sRall Re parked in one block at tRe same time,” except at establisRed taxi stands, etc. '

Verdict: Guilty.

Judgment: Eine of $1.00 and costs.

Defendant appeals, assigning errors.

*Attorney-General Seaivell and Assistant Attorney-General McMullan for the State.*

*Shelley B. Gaveness for defendant.*

Stacy, O. J.

The defendant by his appeal seeks to test tRe constitutionality of the traffic ordinance which makes it unlawful for more than two taxicabs, *owned by the same company,*to be parked in a single block in the city of Greensboro at the same time. The warrant is not sufficient to charge a violation of the ordinance. Indeed, it charges no offense at all. The action will be dismissed on authority of *S. v. Beasley,*196 N. C., 797, 147 S. E., 301, and *S. v. Shipman,*203 N. C., 325, 166 S. E., 298.

It is not after the manner of appellate courts to decide constitutional questions except in the exercise of judicial power properly invoked. *S. v. Williams,*209 N. C., 57, 182 S. E., 711; *In re Parker, ibid.,*693, 184 S. E., 532; *Newman v. Comrs.,*208 N. C., 675, 182 S. E., 453; *Wood v. Braswell,*192 N. C., 588, 135 S. E., 529. A warrant that cRarges no offense will not suffice for such invocation, even though its invalidity be observed *sua sponte. S. v. Beasley, supra.*

Action dismissed.
Exhibit 31.4

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification

I, Paul S. Weiner, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc.; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: April 26, 2013 |  |                        
|                     | 
|                     |  | /s/ Paul S. Weiner     
|                     |  | Paul S. Weiner         
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 41 (Thursday, March 2, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 11659]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5131]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army


Army Science Board Notice of Closed Meeting

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following 
Committee Meeting:

    Name of Committee: Army Science Board (ASB).
    Date of Meeting: 10 April 1995.
    Time of Meeting: 0800-1700.
    Place: USAMICOM--Huntsville, Alabama
    Agenda: The Army Science Board's Ad Hoc Study on ``ASB Space and 
Missile Defense Organization'' will have its 5th meeting at the 
USAMICOM on 10 April 1995. This meeting will be closed to the public 
in accordance with Section 552b(c) of title 5, U.S.C., specially 
subparagraph (1) thereof, and Title 5, U.S.C., Appendix 2, 
subsection 10(d). The classified and unclassified matter to be 
discussed are so inextricably intertwined so as to preclude opening 
all portions of the meeting. The ASB Administrative Officer, Sally 
Warner, may be contacted for further information at (703) 695-0781.
Sally A. Warner,
Administrative Officer, Army Science Board.
[FR Doc. 95-5131 Filed 3-1-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1997 AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,247
<SECURITIES>                                       528
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,788
<ALLOWANCES>                                       150
<INVENTORY>                                      1,940
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,345
<PP&E>                                           1,053
<DEPRECIATION>                                     491
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,875
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,710
<BONDS>                                              1
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           104
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,910
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,875
<SALES>                                         20,853
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,853
<CGS>                                           15,702
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,702
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (377)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    25
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 177
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    385
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                385
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       385
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit
32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION**
 
 Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Industrial Enterprises of
America, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to
such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
the quarter ended December 31, 2004 (the "Form 10-QSB") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-QSB
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form
10-QSB.
 
 
 
 Dated:
March 31, 2005
 
 /s/
Crawford Shaw
 Crawford
Shaw
 Chief
Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board and President
 
 
 
 
 The
foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate
disclosure document.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-10425

Titan International, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4072 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to empower the States to set the 

maximum annual percentage rates applicable to consumer credit transactions, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 7, 2022 

Mr. WHITEHOUSE (for himself, Mr. REED, Ms. WARREN, Mr. MERKLEY, and 

Mr. SANDERS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to empower the States 

to set the maximum annual percentage rates applicable 

to consumer credit transactions, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Empowering States’ 

5 Rights To Protect Consumers Act of 2022’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIMITS ON ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATES. 

7 Chapter 2 of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 

8 1631 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the fol9 lowing: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4072 IS

1 ‘‘SEC. 140B. LIMITS ON ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATES. 

2 ‘‘Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the an3 nual percentage rate applicable to any consumer credit 

4 transaction (other than a residential mortgage trans5 action), including any fees associated with such a trans6 action, may not exceed the maximum rate permitted by 

7 the laws of the State in which the consumer resides.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10.3


 


Amendment #1 to

Promissory Note


 


This AMENDMENT (this “AMENDMENT”)
is entered into by and between Company and Holder (each as defined below), effective as of December 30, 2022 (the “Effective
Date”), binding on the undersigned parties as of that date.


 


Odyssey Health, Inc. (“BORROWER”)
and Jonathan Lutz (“LENDER”) entered into that certain Promissory Note (the “Note”) dated September
21, 2022 in the amount of $30,000.00 (the “Loan Amount”). Capitalized terms not otherwise defined have the meaning
set forth in the Note.


 


Whereas,
the parties have agreed to extend the maturity date of the Note subject to the conditions contained herein.


 


AGREEMENT


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency
of which are hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


		1.	Extension of Maturity Date. The Maturity Date of the Note is amended and extended to January
31, 2023.



 


		2.	Effectiveness; Conflict. Except as modified hereby, the Note and terms thereof shall remain
in full force and effect. On and after the effectiveness of this Amendment, each reference in the Notes to “this Agreement,”
“hereunder,” “hereof,” “herein” or words of like import shall mean and be a reference to the Note,
as amended by this Amendment. To the extent the terms of this Amendment conflict with any provision of the Note or any of the documents
referenced therein, then the provisions of this Amendment shall control.



 


		3.	Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed by facsimile transmission and in counterparts,
each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same agreement.



 


		4.	All Other Terms. All other terms and conditions of the Note remain unchanged and in full
force and effect.



 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and acknowledging acceptance
and agreement of the foregoing, BORROWER, and LENDER affix their signatures hereto,


 








	Odyssey Group International, Inc.	 	Jonathan Lutz
	 	 	 
	/s/ J. Michael Redmond                          	 	/s/ Jonathan
  Lutz                                   
	By: J. Michael Redmond	 	By: Jonathan Lutz
	Title: President	 	An Individual
	Dated: December 30, 2022	 	Dated: December 30, 2022
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 2060** 

JASON LEON DIEDRICH , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS, VIRGINIA; JAMES M. BOUREY; RICHARD W. MYERS; YVONNE M. MANNING , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Newport News . Raymond A. Jackson , District Judge. ( 4:15

- cv - 00002

- RAJ

- LRL )

Submitted : April 29, 2016 Decided: June 21, 2016

Before KEENAN and WYNN , Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Kevin P. Shea, KEVIN P. SHEA, ATTORNEY

– AT

- LAW, INC., Hampton, Virginia, for Appellant. Darlene P. Bradberry, Christopher M. Midgley, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Ne wport News, Virginia, for Appellee s . Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jason Leon Diedrich appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing his civil action alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and s t ate law. On appeal he rais es three issues: (1) w hether the district court erred by finding that hi s demotion claim was barred by res judicata; (2) w hether the district court erred by ruling that hi s personnel records claim was time barred; and (3) w hethe r the district court erred by denying hi m a hearing on the motion to dismiss.
We r eview de novo the district court’s grant ing of Defendants’ motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Philips v. Pitt Cnty. Mem’l Hosp. , 572 F.3d 176, 179

- 80 (4th Cir. 2009). Like the district court, we must take the complaint’s factual allegations as true and draw all reasonable inferences in the plaintiff’s favor. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Kolon Indus. Inc. , 637 F.3d 435, 440 ( 4th Cir. 2011). To survive a motion to dismiss, a complaint must contain sufficient facts to state a claim that is plausible on its face. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly , 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)
. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Acc ordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Diedrich v. City of Newport News , No. 4:15

- cv - 00002

- RAJ

LRL (E.D
. Va. Aug. 12, 2015) ; see Cray Comm c’ns , Inc. v. Novatel Computr Sys ., Inc. , 33 F.3d 390, 396 (4th Cir. 1994) (noting3 that th ere is no absolute requirement that a ruling on a summary motion be preceded by a hearing)
. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the d ecisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT (99.1)
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Marx Toys and Entertainment Corp.
(Formerly setereoscape.com, inc.) (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year
ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steve Wise, Chief Executive Officer and sole
officer and director of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; (2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



/s/ Steve Wise
Chief Executive Officer
Sole Officer and Director
May 13, 2003
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending December 29, 2006
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jerry C. Young, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Jerry C. YoungJerry C. YoungChief Financial OfficerMarch 23, 2007




77