11670 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 41 / Thursday, March 2, 1995 / Notices

preparing a PRS which will include

budgeted OM&R and repayment costs

for the PRP. The revenue requirement

shown in this PRS will not be

dependent upon the power and energy

made available for sale, or the rate of

generation each year. The amount of

each monthly payment for the following

FY shall be established in advance by

Western and submitted to each

contractor on or before August 31 of the

year preceding the appropriate FY.

The preparation of each FYs PRS shall

include adjustment to the figures used

in the previous year’s PRS to

incorporate final financial and

operational data for the prior FY. Any

adjustments required, whether resulting

in an increase or decrease of the annual

sum due, will be added to the FY then

being calculated, and divided over 12

equal monthly installments.

Minor replacements and additions

will be included in annual OM&R

expenses. If replacements and/or

additions exceeding $5,000.00, but no

greater than $25,000.00, in cost are

needed, the contractors will be given the

option of financing the cost through

their own non-Federal sources or having

the cost financed by the Federal

Government and amortized and paid

over the lesser of the average life of the

replacement or 50 years, whichever is

less. Additions will be amortized over

50 years. If financed with Federal funds,

the cost will be capitalized at the thencurrent interest rate prescribed by DOE,

pursuant to RA 6120.2 11B, ‘‘Basic

Policy for Rate Adjustments; Interest

Rate Formula,’’ in the FY in which

funds are first expended for the

replacement or addition.

If replacements over $25,000.00 are

needed, the contractors will consult

with Reclamation, the PRWUA, and

Western about financing the

replacement.

The proposed formula constitutes a

minor rate adjustment as defined by the

procedures for public participation in

general rate adjustments covered in 10

CFR 903.2(f). The PRP’s annual sales are

less than 100 million kWh and installed

capacity is less than 20,000 kW.

Comments

During the 30-day comment period,

Western received no written comments

either requesting information or

commenting on the formula. Comments

were received in response to the

revised, PRP–MP Federal Register

notice dated July 11, 1994 (59 FR

35334). Comments were accepted on

Western’s revised PRP–MP proposal

until August 10, 1994. These comments

were addressed in the PRP–MP Federal

Register notice dated November 21,

1994 (59 FR 60007).

Environmental Evaluation

In compliance with the National

Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42

U.S.C. 4321 et seq.; Council on

Environmental Quality Regulations (40

CFR Parts 1500–1508); and DOE NEPA

Regulations (10 CFR Part 1021), Western

has determined that this action is

categorically excluded from the

preparation of an environmental

assessment or an environmental impact

statement.

Executive Order 12866

DOE has determined that this is not

a significant regulatory action because it

does not meet the criteria of Executive

Order 12866, 58 FR 51735. Western has

an exemption from centralized

regulatory review under Executive

Order 12866; accordingly, no clearance

of this notice by the Office of

Management and Budget is required.

Availability of Information

Information regarding this rate order,

including PRSs, comments, letters,

memorandums, and other supporting

material made or kept by Western for

the purpose of developing the revenuerecovery methodology, is available for

public review at the following offices:

Western Area Power Administration,

Salt Lake City Area Office, Office of

the Assistant Area Manager for Power

Marketing, 257 East 200 South, Suite

475, Salt Lake City, UT 84111

Western Area Power Administration,

Division of Marketing and Rates, 1627

Cole Boulevard, Golden, CO 80401

Western Area Power Administration,

Office of the Assistant Administrator

for Washington Liaison, Room 8G–

027, Forrestal Building, 1000

Independence Avenue SW.,

Washington, DC 20585

Submission to Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission

The formula for determining annual,

power-related payments herein

confirmed, approved, and placed into

effect on an interim basis, together with

supporting documents, will be

submitted to FERC for confirmation and

approval on a final basis.

Order

In view of the foregoing and pursuant

to the authority delegated to me by the

Secretary of Energy, I confirm and

approve on an interim basis, effective

April 1, 1995, the method of cost

recovery for the Provo River Project. The

procedure shall remain in effect on an

interim basis, pending Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission confirmation

and approval of it or a substitute process

on a final basis, through March 31,

2000.

Issued in Washington, DC, February 16,

1995.

Bill White,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–4880 Filed 3–1–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P

FEDERAL EMERGENCY

MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA–1039–DR]

Alaska; Amendment to Notice of a

Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency

Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice

of a major disaster for the State of

Alaska (FEMA–1039–DR), dated

September 13, 1994, and related

determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 16, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Pauline C. Campbell, Response and

Recovery Directorate, Federal

Emergency Management Agency,

Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–3606.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is

hereby given that, in a letter dated

February 16, 1995, the President

amended the cost-sharing arrangements

concerning Federal funds provided

under the authority of the Robert T.

Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency

Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.),

in a letter to James L. Witt, Director of

the Federal Emergency Management

Agency, as follows:

I have determined that the damage in

certain areas of the State of Alaska, resulting

from severe storms and flooding on August

8, 1994 through September 15, 1994, is of

sufficient severity and magnitude that special

cost-sharing conditions are warranted under

the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and

Emergency Assistance Act (‘‘the Stafford

Act’’) for the Pubic Assistance program.

Therefore, I amend my previous

declaration to authorize Federal funds for

Public Assistance to be provided at 85

percent of the eligible costs.

This adjustment to State and local cost

sharing applies only to Public Assistance

costs eligible for such adjustment under the

law. The law specifically prohibits a similar

adjustment for funds provided to States for

the Individual and Family Grant program.

These funds will continue to be reimbursed

at 75 percent of total eligible costs.

Please notify the Governor of the State of

Alaska and the Federal Coordinating Officer

of this amendment to my major disaster

declaration.
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 41 / Thursday, March 2, 1995 / Notices 11671

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No.

83.516, Disaster Assistance.)

James L. Witt,

Director.

[FR Doc. 95–5156 Filed 3–1–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6718–02–M

[FEMA–1044–DR]

Amendment to Notice of a Major

Disaster Declarations; CA

AGENCY: Federal Emergency

Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice

of a major disaster for the State of

California, (FEMA–1044–DR), dated

January 10, 1995, and related

determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 21, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Pauline C. Campbell, Response and

Recovery Directorate, Federal

Emergency Management Agency,

Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–3606.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice

of a major disaster for the State of

California dated January 10, 1995, is

hereby amended to include the

following areas among those areas

determined to have been adversely

affected by the catastrophe declared a

major disaster by the President in his

declaration of January 10, 1995:

The counties of El Dorado, Madera, and

Solano for Individual Assistance and Public

Assistance.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No.

83.516, Disaster Assistance)

Richard W. Krimm,

Associate Director, Response and Recovery

Directorate.

[FR Doc. 95–5155 Filed 3–1–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6718–02–M

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Ocean Freight Forwarder License

Applicants

Notice is hereby given that the

following applicants have filed with the

Federal Maritime Commission

applications for licenses as ocean freight

forwarders pursuant to section 19 of the

Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. app.

1718 and 46 CFR 510).

Persons knowing of any reason why

any of the following applicants should

not receive a license are requested to

contact the Office of Freight Forwarders,

Federal Maritime Commission,

Washington, DC 20573.

MSL Express Inc., 160–19 Rockaway

Boulevard C, Jamaica, NY 11434,

Officers: Chester Tong, President, Lily

Tong, Vice President

New K.S.A.I. Inc., 9009 La Cienega

Boulevard, Inglewood, CA 90301,

Officers: Kunihiro Iwahashi,

President, Satoshi Hattori, Treasurer

Dated: February 27, 1995.

By the Federal Maritime Commission.

Joseph C. Polking,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–5124 Filed 3–1–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730–01–M

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Eastside Holding Corporation, et al.;

Formations of; Acquisitions by; and

Mergers of Bank Holding Companies

The companies listed in this notice

have applied for the Board’s approval

under section 3 of the Bank Holding

Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1842) and §

225.14 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12

CFR 225.14) to become a bank holding

company or to acquire a bank or bank

holding company. The factors that are

considered in acting on the applications

are set forth in section 3(c) of the Act

(12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).

Each application is available for

immediate inspection at the Federal

Reserve Bank indicated. Once the

application has been accepted for

processing, it will also be available for

inspection at the offices of the Board of

Governors. Interested persons may

express their views in writing to the

Reserve Bank or to the offices of the

Board of Governors. Any comment on

an application that requests a hearing

must include a statement of why a

written presentation would not suffice

in lieu of a hearing, identifying

specifically any questions of fact that

are in dispute and summarizing the

evidence that would be presented at a

hearing.

Unless otherwise noted, comments

regarding each of these applications

must be received not later than March

27, 1995.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta

(Zane R. Kelley, Vice President) 104

Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia

30303:

1. Eastside Holding Corporation,

Snellville, Georgia; to become a bank

holding company by acquiring 100

percent of the voting shares of The

Eastside Bank & Trust Company,

Snellville, Georgia.

B. Federal Reserve Bank of

Minneapolis (James M. Lyon, Vice

President) 250 Marquette Avenue,

Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480:

1. Guaranty Development Company,

Livingston, Montana; to acquire 100

percent of the voting shares of American

Bank (Whitefish), Whitefish, Montana.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve

System, February 24, 1995.

Jennifer J. Johnson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 95–5118 Filed 3–1–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210–01–F

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 94E–0360]

Determination of Regulatory Review

Period for Purposes of Patent

Extension; Albunex

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration,

HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug

Administration (FDA) has determined

the regulatory review period for

Albunex and is publishing this notice

of that determination as required by

law. FDA has made the determination

because of the submission of an

application to the Commissioner of

Patents and Trademarks, Department of

Commerce, for the extension of a patent

which claims that medical device.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and

petitions should be directed to the

Dockets Management Branch (HFA–

305), Food and Drug Administration,

rm. 1–23, 12420 Parklawn Dr.,

Rockville, MD 20857.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Brian J. Malkin, Office of Health Affairs

(HFY–20), Food and Drug

Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,

Rockville, MD 20857, 301–443–1382.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug

Price Competition and Patent Term

Restoration Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98–417)

and the Generic Animal Drug and Patent

Term Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100–670)

generally provide that a patent may be

extended for a period of up to 5 years

so long as the patented item (human

drug product, animal drug product,

medical device, food additive, or color

additive) was subject to regulatory

review by FDA before the item was

marketed. Under these acts, a product’s

regulatory review period forms the basis

for determining the amount of extension

an applicant may receive.

A regulatory review period consists of

two periods of time: A testing phase and

an approval phase. For medical devices,

the testing phase begins with a clinical

investigation of the device and runs

until the approval phase begins. The