alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 37 (Friday, February 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 10358]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4621]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[I.D. 020995C]

Endangered Species; Permits

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Issuance of permit 943 (P430A) and permit 648A (P45N)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    On October 26, 1994, notice was published (59 FR 53780) that an 
application had been filed by Thomas F. Savoy and Deborah J. Shake of 
the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection (P430A) to take 
listed shortnose sturgeon (Acipenser brevirostrum) in the Connecticut 
River as authorized by the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) (16 
U.S.C. 1531-1543) and the NMFS regulations governing listed fish and 
wildlife permits (50 CFR parts 217-222).
    Notice is hereby given that on February 17, 1995, as authorized by 
the provisions of the ESA, NMFS issued Permit No. 943 to take shortnose 
sturgeon for measuring, examining, and tagging, subject to certain 
conditions set forth therein.
    Notice is hereby given that on February 21, 1995, NMFS issued 
Permit 648A to the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service to maintain captive 
listed shortnose sturgeon (Acipenser brevirostrum), pursuant to section 
10 of the ESA.
    Issuance of these permits, as required by the ESA, were based on 
findings that such permits: (1) Were applied for in good faith; (2) 
will not operate to the disadvantage of the listed species which is the 
subject of these permits; (3) are consistent with the purposes and 
policies set forth in section 2 of the ESA. These permits were also 
issued in accordance with and are subject to parts 217-222 of Title 50 
CFR, the NMFS regulations governing listed species permits.
    The applications, permits, and supporting documentation are 
available for review by interested persons in the following offices, by 
appointment:
    Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, 1335 East-West Highway, Silver 
Spring, MD 20910-3226 (301-713-1401); and
    Northeast Region, NMFS, NOAA, One Blackburn Drive, Gloucester, MA 
01930 (508-281-9250) for Permit 943; or
    Southeast Region, NMFS, NOAA, 9721 Executive Center Drive, St. 
Petersburg, FL 33702-2432 (813-893-3141) for Permit 648A.

    Dated: February 21, 1995.
Patricia A. Montanio,
Acting Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 95-4621 Filed 2-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 41 (Thursday, March 2, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 11677]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5147]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[OR-943-1430-01; GP5-074; OR-48631]


Termination of Proposed Withdrawal; Oregon

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management has canceled its application to 
withdraw 222.77 acres of public land for protection of the Mariposa 
Botanical Area located in Jackson County, Oregon. This action will 
terminate the proposed withdrawal and will relieve the land of the 
temporary segregative effect. The minerals are not in Federal 
ownership.

DATES: April 3, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linda Sullivan, BLM Oregon/Washington 
State Office, P.O. Box 2965, Portland, Oregon 97208-2965, 503-952-6171.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A Notice of Proposed Withdrawal was 
published in the Federal Register, 58 FR 26153, April 30, 1993, as 
corrected by 58 FR 29254, May 19, 1993, which segregated the land 
described therein from settlement, sale, location, or entry under the 
general land laws, including the United States mining laws, subject to 
valid existing rights. The purpose of the proposed withdrawal was to 
protect the Mariposa Botanical Area. The applicant agency has 
determined that the proposed withdrawal is no longer needed and has 
canceled the application in its entirety as to the following described 
land:

Willamette Meridian

T. 41 S., R. 2 E.,
    Sec. 8, those portions of the W\1/2\NE\1/4\, NW\1/4\, and N\1/
2\SW\1/4\ lying westerly of Interstate 5 and excepting lands now 
owned by the State of Oregon as more particularly identified and 
described in the official records of the Bureau of Land Management, 
Oregon State Office.

    The area described contains approximately 222.77 acres in 
Jackson County.

    At 8:30 a.m. on April 3, 1995 the proposed withdrawal will be 
terminated and the land will be relieved of the segregative effect of 
the above-referenced application.

    Dated: February 16, 1995.
Robert D. DeViney, Jr.,
Acting Chief, Branch of Realty and Records Services.
[FR Doc. 95-5147 Filed 3-1-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-P
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-11-0000013 22-MAY-2015 07:53 AM
Fifth Season International Inc.: Exhibit 10.20 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






Exhibit 10.20

Agreement for Sale of Commodity

Party A: The Fifth Season (Zhejiang) Commerce and
Trade Co., Ltd. 

Party B: Guangdong Yuehe Assets Management Co.,
Ltd. 

	General Information 



	Pursuant to the contract entered on January 12, 2011, Party B will buy the
  refined iron powder with iron content of 64% 6224 tons (±0.5%) and with iron
  content of 62% (±0.5%) from Party A. 




	Fees of the Commodity and Payment Arrangement 



	The total fees will be RMB 10,393,536.38 yuan.
  
	Party B will pay when the goods are delivered. 




	Delivery Date 



	This contract shall be effective until March 30, 2011 




	Headlines of the articles omitted 



	Validity, Modification and Termination of Contract
  
	Dispute Settlement
  
	Breach of the Agreement
  
	Miscellaneous 









Signature Page 



Party A: The Fifth Season (Zhejiang) Commerce and Trade Co., Ltd. 

By: /seal/ The Fifth Season (Zhejiang) Commerce and Trade Co., Ltd. 

Date: January 12, 2011 



Party B: Guangdong Yuehe Assets Management Co., Ltd. 

By: /seal/ Guangdong Yuehe Assets Management Co., Ltd. 

Date: January 12, 2011
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Poisonous Plant Research: Logan, UT
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    IACUC SummariesSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Logan, Utah Poisonous Plant Research Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications
- IACUC Summary
- Bulletin 415

Research Projects Subjects of Investigation at this LocationEach ARS research project has related subjects of investigation.  Listed below are the subjects of investigation currently conducted at this location.
Clicking on a subject of investigation will list the research projects within that  subject of investigation.Subjects of Investigation
                            Beef cattle, live animal
                                Desert and semidesert shrub land and shinnery
                                Goats, meat and mohair
                                Hemp
                                Mountain grasslands, meadow, and alpine
                                Sheep, live animal


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 13, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1574

Yinlun TDI, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10.35

                     FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT



This amendment shall change and amend that certain Employment Agreement between
FutureOne, Inc., a Nevada corporation and Alan Hald, dated January 1, 2000 (the
"Original Agreement").

1)   The parties hereby agree to extend the Term of the Original Agreement as
     defined in Section 1 of the Original Agreement to include the Subsequent
     Employment Term, which shall extend the Original Agreement to December 31,
     2000, based on the following compensation:

         a.       Employee shall continue to be paid the Base Salary ($10,000
                  per month) as defined in Section 4A for the additional six
                  month period.

         b.       Employee shall continue to receive the Warrants as defined in
                  Section 4C, (70,000 warrants per month) for the additional six
                  month period and the Warrants shall be in the form of the
                  original Warrant as indicated on Exhibit A.

These are the only changes to the Employment Agreement and all other terms and
conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

Agreed as of the __ day of March, 2000.


FutureOne, Inc.                                  Employee


By _____________________________                 _____________________________
     President


                                       1
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-19-00079-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF E.J.M.K., a Child

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018PA00825

Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE WATKINS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s termination order is 

AFFIRMED and appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw is DENIED.

We order that no costs be assessed against the appellant because she is indigent.

SIGNED August 7, 2019.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
                             ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT
                             --------------------




The Board of Directors
Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos.
33-47016, 333-53463, 333-69631 and 333-86441) on Form S-8 and (Nos. 333-72659
and 333-89525) on Form S-3 of Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation of our report
dated October 14, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Vitesse
Semiconductor Corporation and subsidiaries as of September 30, 1999, and 1998,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and
cash flows and related schedule for each of the years in the three-year period
ended September 30, 1999, which report appears in the September 30, 1999, annual
report on Form 10-K of Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation.

(signed) KPMG LLP

Los Angeles, California
December 22, 1999
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

 

# **CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

#  

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 of HF Financial Corp., pertaining to the HF Financial Corp. 2002 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, the 1991 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, the 1996 Director Restricted Stock Plan, and the Retirement Savings Plan of our report dated July 30, 2004, accompanying the consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows of HF Financial Corp. for the year ended June 30, 2004.

 

 
|                      | /s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP |   |
|---------------------------|---------------------------------|--------|
|                      |
| Sioux Falls, South Dakota |
| September 21, 2006        |

 

----
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without

oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

FRANCISCO JAVIER RODRIGUEZ,

AKA Javier LNU,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 08-50313

D.C. No. 2:05-cr-00668-MMM-23

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Margaret M. Morrow, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 3, 2009** 

Pasadena, California

Before: T.G. NELSON, BYBEE and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Francisco Javier Rodriguez appeals the district court’s imposition of a 168-

month sentence and $625,000 fine for violations of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1),

FILED

NOV 18 2009

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
841(b)(1)(A), and 846. This court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

affirm.

The district court’s determination that Rodriguez had not accepted

responsibility, and therefore did not qualify for a three-level deduction in offense

level, was not clearly erroneous because of Rodriguez’s intervening drugtrafficking conduct. See United States v. Cooper, 912 F.2d 344, 346 (9th Cir.

1990). Moreover, the total sentence imposed was reasonable under 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3553(a) because the district court relied on multiple factors, including

Rodriguez’s comparatively greater role in the drug conspiracy and the inability of

the sentencing guidelines to capture the totality of Rodriguez’s drug-trafficking

conduct. United States v. Saeteurn, 504 F.3d 1175, 1181 (9th Cir. 2007). The

district court’s imposition of a $625,000 fine was reasonable given the financial

information the district court had before it. United States v. Orlando, 553 F.3d

1235, 1239 (9th Cir. 2009).

Finally, the government’s sentencing position was not plainly erroneous

because the government’s obligations under the plea agreement were not triggered

unless Rodriguez accepted responsibility. See United States v. Maldonado, 215

F.3d 1046, 1051 (9th Cir. 2000). 

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 31.1


                                 CERTIFICATIONS

     I, Ronald S. Saks, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed  this  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of LMI  Aerospace,
Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a  material  fact or omit to  state a  material  fact  necessary  to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances  under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge,  the financial  statements,  and other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The registrant's  other certifying  officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused  such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over  financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial  reporting,  to
the  registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee of  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a) All significant  deficiencies  and material  weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: August 16, 2004                 /s/ Ronald S. Saks
                                      -------------------------------------
                                      Ronald S. Saks
                                      Chief Executive Officer and President
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 23-3626

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Ali Alva-Joya lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________ Submitted: May 16, 2024 Filed: May 23, 2024 [Unpublished]

____________ Before GRUENDER, ERICKSON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Ali Alva-Joya appeals after he pleaded guilty to a drug-conspiracy charge pursuant to a written plea agreement containing an appeal waiver and the districtcourt 1 imposed a below-Guidelines-range sentence. His counsel has moved to

withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). We conclude that the appeal waiver is valid, enforceable, and applicable to the issues raised in this appeal. See United States v. Scott , 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (reviewing de novo the validity and applicability of an appeal waiver); United States v. Andis , 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (explaining that an appeal waiver will be enforced if the appeal falls within the scope of the waiver, the defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into the plea agreement and the waiver, and enforcing the waiver would not result in a miscarriage of justice). We have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal outside the scope of the appeal waiver. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and dismiss this appeal.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Roseann A. Ketchmark, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. -2-
EXHIBIT 32.1CERTIFICATION     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, the undersigned certifies that (1) this Quarterly Report of MSX International, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal period ended April 3, 2005, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) theinformation contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company./s/ Robert Netolicka
1 The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Arkansas, sitting by designation.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-3734

___________ * International Brotherhood of * Electrical Workers, Local 288, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Northern * District of Iowa CCT Corporation d/b/a * Black Hawk Electrical Company and * [UNPUBLISHED] All County Electric Company, * * Appellants. * *

_________ Submitted: April 22, 1999 Filed: May 28, 1999

__________ Before BEAM, HANSEN, Circuit Judges, and MOODY, District Judge. 1

__________ PER CURIAM. Aftercarefully reviewing the record, the Court finds that the appeal in the abovestyledcase should be stayed pending the outcome of an appeal to the National Labor-2-

Relations Board ("NLRB") by CCT Corporation d/b/a Black Hawk Electrical Company ("CCT Corporations") and All County Electric Company. Therefore, we retain jurisdictionand remand with instructions that the District Court stay all proceedings in this matter and file a status report with this panel within ninety days of the date of this Order as to the disposition, if any, by the NLRB of CCT Corporation's and All County Electric Company's pending appeal. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.