Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 8, 1995 / Notices 12767

Comments received within the

specified time period will be considered

before a final decision is made;

comments received after the time

specified will be considered only to the

extent possible without delaying

processing of the application.

Written comments filed pursuant to

this notice, will be available in the

Public Response and Program Resources

Branch, Field Operation Division office

at the address provided from 8 a.m. to

4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except

legal holidays. It is suggested that

persons interested in reviewing the

application file, telephone the FOD

office (703–305–5805), to ensure that

the file is available on the date of

intended visit.

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136.

List of Subjects

Environmental protection, Pesticides

and pests, Product registration.

Dated: February 24, 1995.

Janet L. Andersen,

Acting Director, Biopesticides and Pollution

Prevention Division, Office of Pesticide

Programs.

[FR Doc. 95–5397 Filed 3–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–F

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

[WT Docket No. 95–26; FCC 95–59]

Notice of Order to Show Cause;

Commercial Realty St. Pete, Inc.

AGENCY: Federal Communications

Commission.

ACTION: Notice of order to show cause.

SUMMARY: Commercial Realty St. Pete,

Inc. (Commercial Realty), an Interactive

Video and Data Services (IVDS) auction

bidder, and its principals are ordered to

show cause why they should not be

barred from participating in any future

Commission auction and from holding

any Commission licenses. The

Commission has determined that

Commercial Realty and its principals

have engaged in serious misconduct that

call into question their basic

qualifications to be a Commission

applicant or licensee. The hearing will

examine the misconduct to determine

whether the abuses and violations

should prohibit Commercial Realty and

its principals from participating in

Commission auctions and from being

Commission licensees.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications

Commission, Washington, DC 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Joseph Weber, Enforcement Division,

Wireless Telecommunications Bureau

(202) 418–1310.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a

summary of the Order to Show Cause in

WT Docket 95–26, adopted February 15,

1995, and released February 16, 1995.

The full text of Commission decisions

are available for inspection and copying

during normal business hours in the

FCC Dockets Branch (Room 230), 1919

M Street NW., Washington, DC. The

complete text of this decision may also

be purchased from the Commission’s

copy contractor, International

Transcription Service, Inc., 2100 M

Street NW., Suite 140, Washington, DC

20037, (202) 857–3800.

Summary of Order to Show Cause

The Commission has determined that

Commercial Realty engaged in

misconduct during the Commission’s

IVDS auctions. The Commission has

found that a written declaration

submitted by Commercial Realty

contained false information about

Commercial Realty’s financial

qualifications. The Commission has also

determined that inappropriately

claimed a bidding credit as a womanowned company. Finally, the

Commission determined that James C.

Hartley, one of Commercial Realty’s

principals, engaged in improper

communications with other IVDS

bidders.

Pursuant to Section 312 of the

Communications Act of 1934, as

amended, Commercial Realty, James C.

Hartley, and Ralph E. Howe are ordered

to show cause why they should not be

barred from future Commission auctions

and from holding Commission licenses

based upon the following issues listed

below:

(1)(a) The facts and circumstances

surrounding the aforementioned

Declarations submitted to the

Commission by Commercial Realty St.

Pete, Inc.;

(b) Whether Commercial Realty and/

or its principals misrepresented facts,

lacked candor, or attempted to mislead

the Commission;

(c) Whether, based on the evidence

adduced pursuant to 1 (a) and (b),

above, Commercial Realty and/or its

principals should be subject to a

forfeiture up to the statutory limit

pursuant to Section 503 of the

Communications Act, as amended, 47

U.S.C. 503.

(d) Whether, based on the evidence

adduced pursuant to 1 (a) and (b),

above, Commercial Realty and/or its

principals should be barred from future

auctions and from holding Commission

licenses.

(2)(a) The facts and circumstances

surrounding Commercial Realty’s claim

of a bidding credit as a woman-owned

small business at the IVDS auctions;

(b) Whether Commercial Realty and/

or its principals misrepresented facts,

lacked candor, or attempted to mislead

the Commission in claiming a bidding

credit as a woman-owned small

business;

(c) Whether, based on the evidence

adduced pursuant to 2 (a) and (b),

above, Commercial Realty and/or its

principals should be subject to a

forfeiture up to the statutory limit

pursuant to Section 503 of the

Communications Act, as amended, 47

U.S.C. 503;

(d) Whether, based on the evidence

adduced pursuant to 2 (a) and (b),

above, Commercial Realty’s and/or its

principals’ conduct in requesting said

bidding credit as a woman-owned small

business warrants barring Commercial

Realty and/or its principals from future

auctions and from holding Commission

licenses;

(3) Whether Commercial Realty’s and/

or its principals’ improper

communication with Christopher

Pedersen of Interactive America

Corporation should bar Commercial

Realty and/or its principals from future

auctions and from holding Commission

licenses;

(4)(a) The facts and circumstances

surrounding the letter sent by facsimile

to other successful IVDS auction

bidders;

(b) The facts and circumstances

surrounding the press release caused to

be released by Commercial Realty on, or

about, August 5, 1994;

(c) Whether, based on evidence

adduced pursuant to 4 (a) and (b),

above, Commercial Realty and/or its

principals abused the Commission

processes and should be subject to a

forfeiture up to the statutory limit

pursuant to Section 503 of the

Communications Act, as amended, 47

U.S.C. 503:

(d) Whether, based on the evidence

adduced pursuant to 4 (a) and (b),

above, Commercial Realty and/or its

prinicpals abused Commission

processes and should be barred from

future auctions and from holding

Commission licenses;

(5) Whether, based on the totality of

the evidence adduced pursuant to 1 (a)

and (b), 2 (a) and (b), 3, and 4 (a) and

(b), above, and the violations of the

Commission’s Rules established in the

Notice of Apparent Liability for

Forfeiture, File No. 519WT0002,

Commercial Realty and/or its principals
12768 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 8, 1995 / Notices

should be barred from future auctions

and from holding Commission licenses.

Federal Communications Commission.

William F. Caton,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–5569 Filed 3–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712–01–M

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

First Southern Bancshares, Inc., et al.;

Formations of; Acquisitions by; and

Mergers of Bank Holding Companies

The companies listed in this notice

have applied for the Board’s approval

under section 3 of the Bank Holding

Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1842) and §

225.14 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12

CFR 225.14) to become a bank holding

company or to acquire a bank or bank

holding company. The factors that are

considered in acting on the applications

are set forth in section 3(c) of the Act

(12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).

Each application is available for

immediate inspection at the Federal

Reserve Bank indicated. Once the

application has been accepted for

processing, it will also be available for

inspection at the offices of the Board of

Governors. Interested persons may

express their views in writing to the

Reserve Bank or to the offices of the

Board of Governors. Any comment on

an application that requests a hearing

must include a statement of why a

written presentation would not suffice

in lieu of a hearing, identifying

specifically any questions of fact that

are in dispute and summarizing the

evidence that would be presented at a

hearing.

Unless otherwise noted, comments

regarding each of these applications

must be received not later than March

31, 1995.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta

(Zane R. Kelley, Vice President) 104

Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia

30303:

1. First Southern Bancshares, Inc.,

Florence, Alabama; to become a bank

holding company by acquiring 100

percent of the voting shares of First

Southern Bank, Florence, Alabama, a de

novo bank.

B. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

(James A. Bluemle, Vice President) 230

South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois

60690:

1. Citizens Financial Corporation

Employee Stock Ownership Plan, Fort

Atkinson, Wisconsin; to acquire 47.6

percent of the voting shares of Citizens

State bank, Fort Atkinson, Wisconsin,

and thereby indirectly acquire Citizens

Financial Corporation, Fort Atkinson,

Wisconsin.

C. Federal Reserve Bank of

Minneapolis (James M. Lyon, Vice

President) 250 Marquette Avenue,

Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480:

1. Norwest Corporation, Minneapolis,

Minnesota; to acquire 100 percent of the

voting shares of First Tule Bancorp, Inc.,

Tulia, Texas, and thereby indirectly

acquire First Tule Bancorp of Delaware,

Inc., Wilmington, Delaware, and First

Tule National Bank of Tulia, Tulia,

Texas.

2. Norwest Corporation, Minneapolis,

Minnesota; to acquire 100 percent of the

voting shares of New Braunfels

Bancshares, Inc., New Braunfels, Texas,

and thereby indirectly acquire Citizens

Bank, New Braunfels, Texas.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve

System, March 2, 1995.

Jennifer J. Johnson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 95–5603 Filed 3–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210–01–F

Larry D. Peterson; Change in Bank

Control Notice

Acquisition of Shares of Banks or

Bank Holding Companies

The notificant listed below has

applied under the Change in Bank

Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and §

225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12

CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank

holding company. The factors that are

considered in acting on notices are set

forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12

U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notice is available for immediate

inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank

indicated. Once the notice has been

accepted for processing, it will also be

available for inspection at the offices of

the Board of Governors. Interested

persons may express their views in

writing to the Reserve Bank indicated

for the notice or to the offices of the

Board of Governors. Comments must be

received not later than March 22, 1995.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of

Minneapolis (James M. Lyon, Vice

President) 250 Marquette Avenue,

Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480:

1. Larry D. Peterson, Moose Lake,

Minnesota; to acquire an additional 1.3

percent, for a total of 25.5 percent, of the

voting shares of First Financial Services

of Moose Lake, Inc., Moose Lake,

Minnesota, and thereby indirectly

acquire First National Bank of Moose

Lake, Moose Lake, Minnesota.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve

System, March 2, 1995.

Jennifer J. Johnson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 95–5604 Filed 3–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210–01–F

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES

Agency for Toxic Substances and

Disease Registry

Public Meeting of the Native American

Working Group, in Association With

the Meeting of the Citizens Advisory

Committee on Public Health Service

Activities and Research at Department

of Energy (DOE) Sites: Hanford Health

Effects Subcommittee

The Agency for Toxic Substances and

Disease Registry (ATSDR) and the

Centers for Disease Control and

Prevention (CDC) announce the

following meeting.

Name: Public Meeting of the Native

American Working Group (NAWG), in

association with the meeting of the Citizens

Advisory Committee on Public Health

Service Activities and Research at DOE Sites:

Hanford Health Effects Subcommittee.

Time and Date: 1 p.m.–5 p.m., March 15,

1995.

Place: WestCoast Ridpath Hotel, 515 West

Sprague Avenue, Spokane, Washington

99204, telephone (509) 838–2711, FAX (509)

747–6970.

Status: Open to the public, limited only by

the space available. The meeting room

accommodates approximately 50 people.

Background: A Memorandum of

Understanding (MOU) was signed in October

1990 and renewed in November 1992

between ATSDR and DOE. The MOU

delineates the responsibilities and

procedures for ATSDR’s public health

activities at DOE sites required under

sections 104, 107, and 120 of the

Comprehensive Environmental Response,

Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or

‘‘Superfund’’). These activities include health

consultations and public health assessments

at DOE sites listed on, or proposed for, the

Superfund National Priorities List and at

sites that are the subject of petitions from the

public; and other health-related activities

such as epidemiologic studies, health

surveillance, exposure and disease registries,

health education, substance-specific applied

research, emergency response, and

preparation of toxicological profiles.

In addition, under an MOU signed in

December 1990 with DOE, the Department of

Health and Human Services (HHS) has been

given the responsibility and resources for

conducting analytic epidemiologic

investigations of residents of communities in

the vicinity of DOE facilities, workers at DOE

facilities, and other persons potentially

exposed to radiation or to potential hazards

from non-nuclear energy production and use.