12280 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 43 / Monday, March 6, 1995 / Notices

undue burden on interstate commerce.

Promotion of the continued use of the

City Ordinance restricting run-ups

between 12 midnight and 6:00 a.m. is

disapproved pending receipt of

additional information regarding the

City Ordinance, the airport rules and

regulations, and the potential effects on

air transportation. Engine run-up

restrictions that limit the total number

or hours of Stage 2 or Stage 3 operations

would require compliance with 14 CFR

161.

The following program elements on

and off the airport were fully approved:

a. Voluntary use of noise abatement

departure and arrival procedures for

aircraft weighting over 12,500 pounds;

b. Noise barriers and acoustical

shielding;

c. Rezone properties immediately

adjacent to airport property;

d. Revise land use plan for noise

compatibility and community

revitalization;

e. Purchase noise sensitive sites—fee

simple.

f. Where fee simple acquisition cannot

be achieved, obtain avigation easement

and where feasible, soundproofing

existing eligible structures within the 65

DNL;

g. Enact noise disclosure regulations

to inform prospective buyers of

potential noise exposure;

h. Assign a noise abatement officer for

noise program management for all three

city of Fort Worth airports;

i. Continue public involvement

program;

j. Implement a periodic noise

monitoring program; and

k. Conduct noise review and update

as required.

These determinations are set forth in

detail in a Record of Approval endorsed

by the Administrator on February 7,

1995. The Record of Approval, as well

as other evaluation materials and the

documents comprising the submittal,

are available for review at the FAA

office listed above and at the Fort Worth

Department of Aviation Offices.

Issued in Fort Worth, Texas on February

20, 1995.

Otis T. Welch,

Manager, Texas Airport Development Office.

[FR Doc. 95–5420 Filed 3–3–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

Air Traffic Procedures Advisory

Committee

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice

to advise the public that a meeting of

the Federal Aviation Administration Air

Traffic Procedures Advisory Committee

(ATPAC) will be held to review present

air traffic control procedures and

practices for standardization,

clarification, and upgrading of

terminology and procedures.

DATES: The meeting will be held from

April 10 through April 13, 1995, from 9

a.m. to 5 p.m. each day.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held

April 10–12 in the MacCracken Room,

Federal Aviation Administration, 800

Independence Avenue, SW.,

Washington, DC, and on April 13 at the

Air Transport Association of America,

1301 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,

Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.

W. Frank Price, Executive Director,

ATPAC, Air Traffic Rules and

Procedures, 800 Independence Avenue,

SW., Washington, DC 20591, telephone

(202) 267–3725.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant

to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal

Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–

463; 5 U.S.C. App. 2), notice is hereby

given of a meeting of the ATPAC to be

held from April 10 through April 12,

1995, at the Federal Aviation

Administration, 800 Independence

Avenue, SW., Washington, DC, and on

April 13 at the Air Transport

Association of America, 1301

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,

Washington, DC.

The agenda for this meeting will

cover: a continuation of the Committee’s

review of present air traffic control

procedures and practices for

standardization, clarification, and

upgrading of terminology and

procedures. It will also include:

1. Approval of Minutes.

2. Submission and Discussion of

Areas of Concern.

3. Discussion of Potential Safety

Items.

4. Report from Executive Director.

5. Items of Interest.

6. Discussion and agreement of

location and dates for subsequent

meetings.

Attendance is open to the interested

public but limited to the space

available. With the approval of the

Chairperson, members of the public may

present oral statements at the meeting.

Persons desiring to attend and persons

desiring to present oral statements

should notify the person listed above

not later than April 7, 1995. The next

quarterly meeting of the FAA ATPAC is

planned to be held from July 10–13,

1995, in Denver, CO.

Any member of the public may

present a written statement to the

Committee at any time at the address

given above.

Issued in Washington, DC on February 27,

1995.

W. Frank Price,

Executive Director, Air Traffic Procedures

Advisory Committee.

[FR Doc. 95–5425 Filed 3–3–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

Aviation Rulemaking Advisory

Committee Meeting on Air Traffic

Issues

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice

to advise the public of a meeting of the

FAA’s Aviation Rulemaking Advisory

Committee on air traffic issues.

DATES: The meeting will be held on

March 24, 1995, at 9 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at

the Federal Aviation Administration,

800 Independence Ave., NW.,

Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.

Reginald C. Matthews, Air Traffic Rules

and Procedures Service, Federal

Aviation Administration, telephone:

202–267–8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant

to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal

Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–

463; 5 U.S.C. App. II), notice is hereby

given of a meeting of the Aviation

Rulemaking Advisory Committee on air

traffic issues to be held at 1 p.m. on

Friday, March 24, 1995, in Rooms 5A at

the Federal Aviation Administration,

800 Independence Ave., Washington,

DC. The agenda for this meeting will

include briefings on:

• Assignment of new task on special

visual flight rules operations;

• Mode S Study; and

• Status of the Unmanned Air Vehicle

Working Group.

Attendance is open to the interested

public but will be limited to the space

available. The public may present

written statements to the committee at

any time by providing 30 copies to the

Assistant Executive Director, or by

bringing the copies to him at the

meeting. In addition, sign and oral

interpretation can be made available at

the meeting, as well as an assistive

listening device, if requested 10

calendar days before the meeting.

Arrangements may be made by

contacting the person listed under the

heading FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT.
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 43 / Monday, March 6, 1995 / Notices 12281

Issued in Washington, DC on February 23,

1995.

Reginald C. Matthews,

Assistant Executive Director, Aviation

Rulemaking Advisory Committee on Air

Traffic Issues.

[FR Doc. 95–5417 Filed 3–3–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

Notice of Intent To Rule on Application

to Impose and Use the Revenue From

a Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) at

Aspen-Pitkin County Airport/Sardy

Field, Submitted by Pitkin County,

Aspen, CO

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent to rule on

application.

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and

invites public comment on the

application to impose and use PFC

revenue at Aspen-Pitkin County

Airport/Sardy Field under the

provisions of 49 U.S.C. 40117 and part

158 of the Federal Aviation Regulations

(14 CFR 158).

DATES: Comments must be received on

or before April 5, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this

application may be mailed or delivered

in triplicate to the FAA at the following

address: Alan E. Wiechmann, Manager;

Denver Airports District Office, DEN–

ADO; Federal Aviation Administration;

5440 Roslyn, Suite 300; Denver, CO

80216–6026.

In addition, one copy of any

comments submitted to the FAA must

be mailed or delivered to Mr. Scott

Smith, Director of Aviation, at the

following address: Aspen-Pitkin County

Airport/Sardy Field, 0233 East Airport

Road, Aspen, CO 81611.

Air Carriers and foreign air carriers

may submit copies of written comments

previously provided to Aspen-Pitkin

County Airport/Sardy Field, under

§ 158.23 of part 158.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Jim Fels, (303) 286–5596; Denver

Airports District Office, DEN–ADO;

Federal Aviation Administration; 5440

Roslyn, Suite 300; Denver, Colorado

80216–6026. The application may be

reviewed in person at this same

location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA

proposes to rule and invites public

comment on the application to impose

and use PFC revenue at Aspen-Pitkin

County Airport/Sardy Field, under the

provisions of 49 U.S.C. 40117 and part

158 of the Federal Aviation Regulations

(14 CFR part 158).

On June 16, 1993, the FAA

determined that the application to

impose and use the revenue from a PFC

submitted by Pitkin County was not

substantially complete within the

requirements of part 158. Pitkin County

was notified by letter dated June 16,

1993, of this determination, with a

request for information which would

have allowed the application to meet

the requirements of part 158. By letter

dated June 30, 1993, Pitkin County

declined to provide the supplemental

information requested. A decision was

made by the FAA to defer action on the

application pending resolution of

Airport Noise and Capacity Act (ANCA)

issues. With the passage of Section 517

of Public Law 103–305 and the opening

of the airport to night access by general

aviation aircraft, under the conditions

specified in this legislation, the ANCA

issues have been resolved. This allows

the FAA to make, at this time, a

determination of substantially complete

on this application. There has been no

change to the original application.

On February 27, 1995, the FAA

determined that the application to

impose and use the revenue from a PFC

submitted by the Aspin-Pitkin County

Airport was substantially complete

within the requirements of § 158.25 of

part 158. The FAA will approve or

disapprove the application, in whole or

in part, no later than June 4, 1995.

The following is a brief overview of

the application.

Level of the proposed PFC: $3.00

Proposed charge effective date: July 1,

1995

Proposed charge expiration date:

January 31, 1998

Total estimated PFC revenues:

$1,533,541.00

Brief description of proposed project:

Relocate State Highway 82; Overlay

runway 15/33.

Class or classes of air carriers which

the public agency has requested not be

required to collect PFC’s: Air taxi/

commercial operators operating

pursuant to § 135.1(a)(3) of the Federal

Aviation Regulations (14 CFR).

Any person may inspect the

application in person at the FAA office

listed above under FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT and at the FAA

Regional Airports Office located at:

Federal Aviation Administration,

Northwest Mountain Region, Airports

Division, ANM–600, 1601 Lind Avenue

SW., Suite 540, Renton, WA 98055–

4056.

In addition, any person may, upon

request, inspect the application, notice

and other documents germane to the

application in person at the AspenPitkin County Airport.

Issued in Renton, Washington on February

27, 1995.

David A. Field,

Manager, Planning, Programming and

Capacity Branch, Northwest Mountain

Region.

[FR Doc. 95–5418 Filed 3–3–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

National Highway Traffic Safety

Administration

[Docket No. 94–100; Notice 2]

Excalibur Automobile Corporation;

Grant of Application for Temporary

Exemption From Motor Vehicle Safety

Standard No. 208

Excalibur Automobile Corporation of

West Allis, Wisconsin, applied for a

temporary exemption of its JAC 427

Cobra passenger car for three years from

compliance with paragraph S4.1.4 of

Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard

No. 208 Occupant Crash Protection. The

basis of the application was that

compliance would cause substantial

economic hardship to a manufacturer

that has tried to comply with the

standard in good faith.

Notice of receipt of the application

was published on December 28, 1994,

and an opportunity afforded for

comment (59 FR 66999). This notice

grants the application.

The applicant sought an exemption

for its JAC 427 Cobra passenger car, of

which it produced 59 between January

1993 and September 1994. Thirty-six of

these ‘‘are presently in the control of

Excalibur’s dealers’’, and the applicant

asked that the exemption cover these

vehicles so that they may be offered for

sale and sold in compliance with the

law. It plans increased production in

1995, of which 60 to 108 would be sold

in the United States.

Excalibur is a small company with 37

employees and net assets of $3,000,000.

The company has had cumulative net

losses of $4,493,000 from January 1,

1992 to September 30, 1994. If it were

required to comply immediately with

the automatic restraint requirements of

Standard No. 208, it would have to raise

the retail price by more than 300 per

cent which ‘‘is likely to deemed (sic) to

be prohibitive by potential purchasers

(and dealers), thereby significantly

reducing the line’s desirability, if not

ending the demand entirely * * *.’’

Denial of the petition would result in a

reduction of the work force to 8

employees.

Excalibur has been owned since 1991

by German residents, who changed the

company’s management in August 1994.

The new management has not been able