alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 2 AND 3 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE AND ITS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                              49
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,198
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,072
<INVENTORY>                                     25,307
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,694
<PP&E>                                         105,247
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,149
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 132,857
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,802
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            95
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,539
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   132,857
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                69,961
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   56,326
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,125
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,097
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,388
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,238
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,150
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,150
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .54


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 28, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 10891]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4821]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Minneapolis/St. Paul Advisory Council Meeting; Public Meeting

    The U.S. Small Business Administration Minneapolis/St. Paul 
District Advisory Council will hold a public meeting on Thursday, March 
23, 1995 at 12:00 noon, at the Decathlon Athletic Club, 1700 East 79th 
Street, Bloomington, Minnesota, to discuss such matters as may be 
presented by members, staff of the U.S. Small Business Administration, 
or others present.

(The meeting scheduled for March 31, 1995 has been canceled).

    For further information, write or call Mr. Edward A. Daum, 
Director, U.S. Small Business Administration, 610-Butler Square, 100 
North Sixth street, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403, (612) 370-2306.

    Dated: February 21, 1995.
Dorothy A. Overal,
Director, Office of Advisory Council.
[FR Doc. 95-4821 Filed 2-27-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 37 (Friday, February 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10399-10400]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4541]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service


Finding of No Significant Impact for an Incidental Take Permit 
for the Proposed Barton Creek Property Development, Southwest of 
Austin, Travis County, TX

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has prepared an 
Environmental Assessment for issuance of a Section 10(a)(1)(B) permit 
for the incidental take of the Federally endangered golden-cheeked 
warbler (Dendroica chrysoparia) during the construction and operation 
of a residential/commercial development in southwest Travis County, 
Texas.

Proposed Action

    The proposed action is the issuance of a permit under Section 
10(a)(1)(2) of the Endangered Species Act to authorize the incidental 
take of the golden-cheeked warbler.
    The Applicant plans to construct single-family, multi-family, and 
villa residences and commercial development on 4,684 acres southwest of 
Austin, Travis Country, Texas. The proposed development will comply 
with all local, State, and Federal environmental regulations addressing 
environmental impacts associated with this type of development. Details 
of the mitigation are provided in the FM Properties Operating Company 
(Applicant) Barton Creek Property development Environmental Assessment/
Habitat Conservation Plan. Guarantees for implementation are provided 
in the Implementing Agreement and Habitat Maintenance Agreement. These 
conservation plan actions ensure that the criteria 
[[Page 10400]] established for issuance of an incidental take permit 
will be fully satisfied.

Alternatives Considered

1. Proposed action,
2. No action,
3. Alternate project design,
4. Wait for the City of Austin's Regional Conservation Plan.

Determination

    Based upon information contained in the Environmental Assessment/
Habitat Conservation Plan, the Service has determined that this action 
is not a major Federal action which would significantly affect the 
quality of the human environment with the meaning of Section 102(2)(c) 
of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. Accordingly, the 
preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement on the proposed action 
is not warranted.
    It is my decision to issue the Section 10(a)(1)(B) permit for the 
construction and operation of the Barton Creek Property development, 
southwest of Austin, Travis County, Texas.
John G. Rogers,
Regional Director, Region 2, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
[FR Doc. 95-4541 Filed 2-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-M
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 5, 2009 

jm 

Order 

 

May 5, 2009 

138806 (22) 

MICHAL DEWAYNE SMITH, 

 Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 138806 

 COA: 289392 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

___________________________________ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it 

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be 

liable for filing fees. 

 Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the 

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $12.00, shall submit a copy of this order 

with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned 

with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being 

filed in this Court. 

 If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly 

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of 

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of 

$363.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court. 

 Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in this 

Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

 The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and 

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 38 

To specify the Federal share of the costs of certain duty of the National 

Guard in connection with the Coronavirus Disease 2019. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25, 2021 

Mr. LEAHY (for himself, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. DURBIN, Ms. DUCKWORTH, Ms. 

BALDWIN, Mr. CASEY, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. TESTER, Mr. 

BENNET, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. SANDERS, and Mr. PETERS) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To specify the Federal share of the costs of certain duty 

of the National Guard in connection with the 

Coronavirus Disease 2019. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FEDERAL SHARE OF COSTS OF CERTAIN DUTY 

4 OF MEMBERS OF THE NATIONAL GUARD IN 

5 CONNECTION WITH THE CORONAVIRUS DIS6 EASE 2019. 

7 (a) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share of the 

8 costs of duty performed by members of the National 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 38 IS

1 Guard under section 502(f) of title 32, United States 

2 Code, for a mission assignment validated by the Federal 

3 Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) pursuant to a 

4 declaration specified in subsection (b) shall be 100 per5 cent. 

6 (b) DECLARATIONS.—A declaration specified in this 

7 subsection is any declaration as follows: 

8 (1) A major disaster declared by the President 

9 under section 401 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster 

10 Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 

11 5170) with respect to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 

12 (COVID–19). 

13 (2) An emergency declared by the President 

14 under section 501 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster 

15 Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 

16 5191) with respect to the Coronavirus Disease 2019. 

17 (3) A national emergency declared by the Presi18 dent under the National Emergencies Act (50 

19 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) with respect to the Coronavirus 

20 Disease 2019. 

21 (4) A public health emergency declared under 

22 section 319 of the Public Health Service Act (42 

23 U.S.C. 247d) with respect to the Coronavirus Dis24 ease 2019. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LUCIA GALOFRE,

Appellant,

v.

BANK OF AMERICA N.A.,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-1469

[September 6, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Joel T. Lazarus, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE 

09020493.

Lucia Galofre, pro se.

Allison Morat, Law Offices of Pearson Bitman LLP, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, DAMOORGIAN and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 15
- 00627
- CR

Marcus Tyler Sheffield, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY NO. CR2011
- 575, THE HONORABLE G ARY L. STEEL, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R F O R C L E R K T O P R O V I D E A P P E L L A T E R E C O R D TO A P P E L L A N T

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s court

- appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief concluding that the instant appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Appellant’s counsel has certified to the Court that he provided copies of the motion and brief to appellant, advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response, and supplied appellant with a form motion for

pro se access to the appellate record. See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319

- 20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Appellant has timely filed the motion requesting access to the appellate record with
this Court. Appellant’s pro se motion is granted. We hereby direct the clerk of the trial

court to provide a copy of the reporter’s record and clerk’s record to appellant, and to providewritten verification to this Court of the date and manner in whic h the appellate record was

provided, on or before August 22, 2016

. See id. at 321.

It is ordered on August 11, 2016.

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Field
Do Not Publish
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 9, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6919-6920]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02577]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #14609]


California Disaster #CA-00243 Declaration of Economic Injury

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) 
declaration for the State of California, dated 02/02/2016.
    Incident: Ocean Conditions Resulting in the Delayed Commercial 
Dungeness Crab Season and Closure of Commercial Rock Crab Fishery.
    Incident Period: 11/06/2015 and continuing.
    Effective Date: 02/02/2016.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/02/2016.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's EIDL declaration, applications for economic injury 
disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other 
locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Alameda, Butte, Contra Costa, Del Norte, El Dorado, 
Humboldt, Lake, Marin, Mendocino,

[[Page 6920]]

Nevada, San Francisco, San Luis Obispo, San Mateo, Santa Cruz, Sonoma.
Contiguous Counties:
    California: Alpine, Amador, Colusa, Glenn, Kern, Kings, Monterey, 
Napa, Placer, Plumas, Sacramento, San Benito, San Joaquin, Santa 
Barbara, Santa Clara, Sierra, Siskiyou, Solano, Stanislaus, Sutter, 
Tehama, Trinity, Yolo, Yuba.
    Nevada: Douglas, Washoe.
    Oregon: Curry, Josephine.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Businesses And Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit      4.000
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere..      2.625
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for economic injury is 146090.
    The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are California, 
Nevada, Oregon.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)


    Dated: February 2, 2016.
Maria Contreras-Sweet,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2016-02577 Filed 2-8-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 41 (Thursday, March 2, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 11667]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5108]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP95-208-000]


Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

February 24, 1995.
    Take notice that on February 21, 1995, Tennessee Gas Pipeline 
Company (Tennessee), P.O. Box 2511, Houston, Texas 77252, filed in 
Docket No. CP95-208-000 a request pursuant to Secs. 157.205 and 157.212 
of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 
157.205, 157.212) for authorization to operate four existing delivery 
taps which were installed under the authorization of Section 311 of the 
Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978, under Tennessee's blanket certificate 
issued in Docket No. CP82-413-000 pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural 
Gas Act, all as more fully set forth in the request that is on file 
with the commission and open to public inspection.
    Tennessee requests authorization to operate the delivery points for 
jurisdictional service as well as for the non-jurisdictional service 
for which they were installed. It is stated that the delivery points 
are located in Tuscarawas County, Ohio; Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana; 
Powell County, Kentucky; and Columbia County, New York. It is asserted 
that Tennessee would use the delivery points for the delivery of gas 
transported under its Part 284 blanket certificate. Tennessee states 
that operation of the delivery points is not prohibited by its existing 
tariff. It is explained that the proposed deliveries would have no 
impact on Tennessee's peak day or annual deliveries and that Tennessee 
has sufficient capacity to accomplish the deliveries without detriment 
or disadvantage to its other existing customers.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Sec. 157.205 of the 
Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to the 
request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, the 
proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day 
after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and 
not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-5108 Filed 3-1-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### ELIZABETH DUDLEY v. F. E. DUDLEY.

(Filed 31 May, 1941.)

Venue § la—

The' provision of O. S., 1667, that a wife may institute action for alimony without divorce in the county in which the cause of action arose does not prescribe the exclusive venue, but the wife may institute the action in the county in which she resides at the commencement of the action, C. S., 469.

Appeal by defendant from *Carr, J.,*at February Term, 1941, of AlAMANCE.

Civil action for alimony without divorce under 0. S., 1667.

Plaintiff and defendant were married on 30 September, 1939, and lived together as husband and wife in the city of "Wilson until 18 December, 1940, at which time, plaintiff alleges, she was forced to flee from the home of the defendant because of his cruel and barbarous treatment of her and to seek refuge as a matter of personal safety in the home of her brother in Alamance County, where she now resides.

This action was instituted in Alamance County on 15 January, 1941.

The defendant seeks to have the cause removed to Wilson County as a matter of right, for that, the cause of action arose there. Motion denied, and defendant appeals.

*J. Elmer Long and Clarence Boss for plaintiff, appellee.*

*W. A. Lucas for defendant, appellant.*

Stacy, C. J.

Plaintiff resides in Alamance County; the defendant in Wilson County. The action is for alimony without divorce under O. S., 1667. The question presented is one of venue.

The defendant says the cause of action arose in Wilson County and is to be tried there according to the clear terms of the statute giving the right. The plaintiff says the cause of action arose in Alamance County, and further that she now resides there.

In an action of this kind, *i.e.,*one for alimony without divorce, the statute provides that “the wife may institute an action in the Superior Court of the county in which the cause of action arose,” but the venue, thus prescribed, is not exclusive, if either the plaintiff or the defendant reside in another county at the commencement of the action, C. S., 469.

*766Under the pertinent decisions it would seem that the motion was properly denied. *Rector v. Rector,*186 N. C., 618, 120 S. E., 195; *Miller v. Miller,*205 N. C., 753, 172 S. E., 493.

Affirmed.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

March 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
128462 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 128462 COA: 251320 Ingham CC: 02-001161-FH OLONDAH ALFRED WILSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the March 1, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

s0320 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 27, 2006

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-Q FILING AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERNCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001059496
<NAME> AMERICAN LAWYER MEDIA HOLDINGS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             299
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,625
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,038
<INVENTORY>                                      1,431
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,117
<PP&E>                                          17,640
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,652
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 354,720
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,976
<BONDS>                                        218,234
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,593
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   354,720
<SALES>                                         97,118
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                97,118
<CGS>                                           36,828
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  102,622
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,952
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (23,456)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,517)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,939)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,939)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>