U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 close



Research
                Research Home
                            National Programs
                            Research Projects
                            Scientific Manuscripts
                            International Engagement
                            Scientific Software/Models
                            Databases and Datasets
                            Office of Scientific Quality Review
            Media
                News & Features
                            Multimedia
                            Briefing Room
                            Down on the Farm
                            Press Room
                            Science in Your Shopping Cart
                            Scientific Discoveries
                            Tellus
                            Under the Microscope
            About ARS
                About ARS Home
                            Staff Directory
                            Labs and Research Centers (Map)
                            Headquarter Offices
                            Organizational Chart
                            Employee Services (REE Employees Only)
                            Office of Outreach, Diversity, and Equal Opportunity
            Work With Us
                Work With Us Home
                            ARS Vacancies at USAJOBS
                            Careers at ARS Information
                            Scientific Collaborations
                            Extramural Agreements
                            1890 Faculty Research Sabbatical ProgramSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Research Publications at this Location





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Title:   Author  item
                                            STARR, G - OSU-SCHOOL OF NATURAL RESitem
                                            LAL, R - OSU-SCHOOL OF NATURAL RESitem
                                            Malone, Robert

                                                         - *Rob*item
                                            Hothem, Danielitem
                                            Owens, Lloyditem
                                            KIMBLE, J - USDA-NRCS
  Submitted to: Land Degradation and Development
                                    Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
                                    Publication Acceptance Date: 5/19/1999
                                    Publication  Date: N/A
                                    Citation: N/AInterpretive Summary: Given the intense interest by both scientists and policy makers with the fate of carbon, it is important to understand the principle factors and processes involved with soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration.  One of these factors is erosion. Long term monitoring to directly assess SOC loss by erosion would be ideal but expensive, therefore, diagnostic models to  assess erosional SOC have been developed.  The objective of this study was to identify and describe approaches for assessing erosional impacts on SOC dynamics using models.  Using 12 years of data, two modeling approaches were compared; one approach relates SOC loss to soil loss on an event basis and another approach relates SOC loss to soil loss using an enrichment ratio (ER).  Enrichment implies that eroded soil has a higher organic carbon content than the near surface soil, and the ER for the watersheds used in this study was determined to be 2.1.  An advantage of the ER  approach is the simplicity and the ease of computing cumulative SOC loss over a long time period from cumulative soil loss.  The main advantage of the first approach is it is more accurate than the ER approach but it is not easy to compute cumulative SOC loss from cumulative soil loss for numerous individual runoff events.  A third modeling approach was presented that relates runoff aggregate size distribution to fate of SOC loss by soil erosion.  Based upon this approach, the larger soil aggregates, a minimum of about 73% of all aggregates, are deposited on the landscape whereas the smaller aggregates, with the most stable SOC, are transported to aquatic ecosystems.  This research will benefit policy makers in making decisions concerning SOC fate on a large scale, and it adds to our understanding of the erosional impacts on SOC.
                                Technical Abstract: Long-term monitoring is needed for direct assessment of soil organic carbon (SOC), soil, and nutrient loss by water erosion on a watershed scale. However labor and capital requirements preclude implementation of such monitoring at many locations representing principal soils and ecoregions. These considerations warrant the development of diagnostic models to assess serosional SOC loss from more readily obtained data. The same factors affec transport of SOC and mineral soil fraction, suggesting that given the gain or loss of conservative soil minerals, it may be possible to estimate the SOC flux from the data on erosion and deposition. One possible approach to parameterization is the use of the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) to predict soil loss and this multiplied by the percent of SOC in the near surface soil and an enrichment factor to obtain SOC loss. The data obtained from two watersheds in Ohio indicate that a power law relationship pbetween soil loss and SOC loss may be more appropriate.  When measured SOC loss in individual events over a 12 yr period was plotted against measured soil loss the data are logarithmically linear (R**2=0.75) with a slope (or exponent in the power law) slightly less than would be expected for a RUSLE type model.  The stable aggregate size distribution in runoff on a plot scale may be used to guess the fate of size pools of SOC by comparing size distributions in the runoff plot scale and river watershed scales.  Based upon this comparison, a minimum of 73% of material from runoff plots is deposited on the landscape and the most stable carbon pool is lost from watershed soils to aquatic ecosystems and atmospheric carbon dioxide. Implicit in these models is the supposition that water stable soil aggregates and primary particles can be viewed as a tracer for SOC.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov