Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

          - [FMCSA Docket No. FMCSA-2015-0336]

# AGENCY:

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Notice of final disposition.

# SUMMARY:

FMCSA confirms its decision to exempt 54 individuals from its rule prohibiting persons with insulin-treated diabetes mellitus (ITDM) from operating commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) in interstate commerce. The exemptions enable these individuals to operate CMVs in interstate commerce.

# DATES:

The exemptions were effective on December 15, 2015. The exemptions expire on December 15, 2017.

      ( print page 6327)    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Christine A. Hydock, Chief, Medical Programs Division, (202) 366-4001,                         *fmcsamedical@dot.gov,*                         FMCSA, Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W64-113, Washington, DC 20590-0001. Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## I. Electronic Access

                    You may see all the comments online through the Federal Document Management System (FDMS) at:                     *http://www.regulations.gov.*

*Docket:*                     For access to the docket to read background documents or comments, go to                     *http://www.regulations.gov*                     and/or Room W12-140 on the ground level of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.                

*Privacy Act:*                     In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts these comments, without edit, including any personal information the commenter provides, to                     *www.regulations.gov,*                     as described in the system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at                     *www.dot.gov/​privacy.*

## II. Background

On November 12, 2015, FMCSA published a notice of receipt of Federal diabetes exemption applications from 54 individuals and requested comments from the public (80 FR 70067). The public comment period closed on December 14, 2015, and one comment was received.

FMCSA has evaluated the eligibility of the 54 applicants and determined that granting the exemptions to these individuals would achieve a level of safety equivalent to or greater than the level that would be achieved by complying with the current regulation 49 CFR 391.41(b)(3).

### Diabetes Mellitus and Driving Experience of the Applicants

The Agency established the current requirement for diabetes in 1970 because several risk studies indicated that drivers with diabetes had a higher rate of crash involvement than the general population. The diabetes rule provides that “A person is physically qualified to drive a commercial motor vehicle if that person has no established medical history or clinical diagnosis of diabetes mellitus currently requiring insulin for control” (49 CFR 391.41(b)(3)).

                    FMCSA established its diabetes exemption program, based on the Agency's July 2000 study entitled “A Report to Congress on the Feasibility of a Program to Qualify Individuals with Insulin-Treated Diabetes Mellitus to Operate in Interstate Commerce as Directed by the Transportation Act for the 21st Century.” The report concluded that a safe and practicable protocol to allow some drivers with ITDM to operate CMVs is feasible. The September 3, 2003 (68 FR 52441),                     **Federal Register**                     notice in conjunction with the November 8, 2005 (70 FR 67777),                     **Federal Register**                     notice provides the current protocol for allowing such drivers to operate CMVs in interstate commerce.                

These 54 applicants have had ITDM over a range of 1 to 41 years. These applicants report no severe hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness or seizure, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning symptoms, in the past 12 months and no recurrent (2 or more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the past 5 years. In each case, an endocrinologist verified that the driver has demonstrated a willingness to properly monitor and manage his/her diabetes mellitus, received education related to diabetes management, and is on a stable insulin regimen. These drivers report no other disqualifying conditions, including diabetes-related complications. Each meets the vision requirement at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10).

                    The qualifications and medical condition of each applicant were stated and discussed in detail in the November 12, 2015,                     **Federal Register**                     notice and they will not be repeated in this notice.                

## III. Discussion of Comments

FMCSA received one comment in this proceeding. Latu Anitoni stated that, in her opinion, drivers using insulin are safer due to the monitoring the condition requires, and believes the exemptions should be granted.

## IV. Basis for Exemption Determination

Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA may grant an exemption from the diabetes requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(3) if the exemption is likely to achieve an equivalent or greater level of safety than would be achieved without the exemption. The exemption allows the applicants to operate CMVs in interstate commerce.

To evaluate the effect of these exemptions on safety, FMCSA considered medical reports about the applicants' ITDM and vision, and reviewed the treating endocrinologists' medical opinion related to the ability of the driver to safely operate a CMV while using insulin.

Consequently, FMCSA finds that in each case exempting these applicants from the diabetes requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(3) is likely to achieve a level of safety equal to that existing without the exemption.

## V. Conditions and Requirements

The terms and conditions of the exemption will be provided to the applicants in the exemption document and they include the following: (1) That each individual submit a quarterly monitoring checklist completed by the treating endocrinologist as well as an annual checklist with a comprehensive medical evaluation; (2) that each individual reports within 2 business days of occurrence, all episodes of severe hypoglycemia, significant complications, or inability to manage diabetes; also, any involvement in an accident or any other adverse event in a CMV or personal vehicle, whether or not it is related to an episode of hypoglycemia; (3) that each individual provide a copy of the ophthalmologist's or optometrist's report to the medical examiner at the time of the annual medical examination; and (4) that each individual provide a copy of the annual medical certification to the employer for retention in the driver's qualification file, or keep a copy in his/her driver's qualification file if he/she is self-employed. The driver must also have a copy of the certification when driving, for presentation to a duly authorized Federal, State, or local enforcement official.

## VI. Conclusion

Based upon its evaluation of the 54 exemption applications, FMCSA exempts the following drivers from the diabetes requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10), subject to the requirements cited above 949 CFR 391.64(b)):

Ramon Becerra (IN)

Harry L. Blakely (MN)

Steven J. Bloemker (OH)

Billy J. Bookout (OK)

David M. Brady (NE)

William G. Bush (IL)

Gene D. Carey, Jr. (PA)

James C. Decker (CA)

Richard D. Doherty (MA)

Richard N. Dunn (KS)

Thomas C. Eklund (OR)

Rodney L. Forrister, Jr. (MI)

Ronald J. Gasper (SD)

                    Jeremy J. Giesbrecht (IN)                          ( print page 6328)    

David F. Goehring (WI)

Robert J. Golding (ME)

Ethan T. Heideman (MN)

Benjamin R. Hickerson (CA)

Timothy J. Hrinak (PA)

Kevin M. Hunt (MI)

David T. Issler (NY)

Todd D. Jacquin (NC)

Bruce E. Kerr (KY)

Mark C. Kucharski (CO)

Philip M. LaPierre (ME)

Mary J. Martin (PA)

Peter J. Meier (WA)

Terry J. Miller (WI)

Michael E. Morel (NH)

Marvin K. Mosley (SC)

Eric Nieves, Jr. (NY)

Jerry D. Pearce (NM)

George W. Pottle, IV (ME)

Kenneth A. Prine (WA)

Charles R. Ratcliff, Jr. (VA)

Joseph B. Ribitzki (AR)

Roger D. Richey (IN)

Michael G. Sanchez (CA)

Guido J. Scarafoni (MA)

Jeffrey M. Schleisman (IA)

Scott J. Schmidt (NE)

Lori A. Shaffnit (IA)

Sanampreet Singh (CA)

Joshua A. Snyder (WV)

Christophe M. Stephens (TN)

Michael A. Stille (GA)

Leonard Tawahongva (AZ)

Edward M. Taylor (NE)

Donald L. Trogdon (ID)

Gregory S. Van Hal (MN)

Lazario R. Watkins (NC)

Eric J. Watson (NY)

William T. White (WA)

J. Ryan Wolf (IN)

In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315 each exemption is valid for two years unless revoked earlier by FMCSA. The exemption will be revoked if the following occurs: (1) The person fails to comply with the terms and conditions of the exemption; (2) the exemption has resulted in a lower level of safety than was maintained before it was granted; or (3) continuation of the exemption would not be consistent with the goals and objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315. If the exemption is still effective at the end of the 2-year period, the person may apply to FMCSA for a renewal under procedures in effect at that time.

Issued on: January 19, 2016.

 Larry W. Minor,

 Associate Administrator for Policy.

[FR Doc. 2016-02299 Filed 2-4-16; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P