alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Sensory Deficits in Osteoporotic Study.                    

*Date:*                         March 15, 2016.                    

*Time:*                         2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, Suite 2C212, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Isis S. Mikhail, DRPH, MD, MPH, National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-7704,                         *MIKHAILI@MAIL.NIH.GOV.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 11, 2016.

Melanie J. Gray,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2016-03237 Filed 2-17-16; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 99.2



                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Forever Enterprises, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael R. Butler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

       (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                of 1934; and

       (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                in all material respects, the financial condition and
                results of operations of the Company.


                         /s/ Michael R. Butler
                         ----------------------------------------------------
                         Chief Financial Officer of Forever Enterprises, Inc.
                         August 14, 2002
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Focal Communications (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ending March 31, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kathleen Perone, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/
Kathleen Perone

Kathleen
Perone
Chief Executive Officer
May 14, 2003

---

QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM LTC
HEALTHCARE, INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30,
2000 FILED HEREWITH AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                              98
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,941
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,162
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          52,849
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,403)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  79,018
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,915
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            33
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,506)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    79,018
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,181
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   50,301
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,843
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,963)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,963)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,963)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.84)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.84)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3820 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3820

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the rate of pay for 
    certain nurses and other medical positions of the Department of 
               Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 10 (legislative day, March 7), 2022

 Mr. Blumenthal (for himself and Ms. Hirono) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the rate of pay for 
    certain nurses and other medical positions of the Department of 
               Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Department of Veterans Affairs Nurse 
and Physician Assistant Retention And Income Security Enhancement Act'' 
or the ``VA Nurse and Physician Assistant RAISE Act''.

SEC. 2. PAY FOR NURSES AND CERTAIN OTHER MEDICAL POSITIONS OF THE 
              DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    Section 7451 of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(2)(C), by striking ``and physician 
        assistant'' and inserting ``physician assistant, and 
        podiatrist''; and
            (2) in subsection (c), by striking paragraph (2) and 
        inserting the following:
    ``(2) The maximum rate of basic pay for any grade for a covered 
position may not exceed--
            ``(A) in the case of an advanced practice nurse, the 
        maximum rate of basic pay established for positions in level I 
        of the Executive Schedule under section 5312 of title 5;
            ``(B) in the case of a physician assistant, the maximum 
        rate of basic pay established for positions in level I of the 
        Executive Schedule under section 5312 of title 5;
            ``(C) in the case of a registered nurse, the maximum rate 
        of basic pay established for positions in level II of the 
        Executive Schedule under section 5313 of title 5; and
            ``(D) in the case of any other covered position, the 
        maximum rate of basic pay established for positions in level IV 
        of the Executive Schedule under section 5315 of title 5.''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7848

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JOSEPH THOMAS SMITH, a/k/a Joseph Smith,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. (3:10-cr-00199-HEH-1; 3:20-cv00836-HEH)

Submitted: July 20, 2021 Decided: July 22, 2021

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Thomas Smith, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Thomas Smith appeals the district court’s order construing his “Motion for 

Administrative Review” as an unauthorized, successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and 

dismissing it for lack of jurisdiction. Our review of the record confirms that the district 

court properly construed Smith’s filing as a successive § 2255 motion over which it lacked 

jurisdiction because Smith failed to obtain prefiling authorization from this court. See 28 

U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(3)(A), 2255(h); United States v. McRae, 793 F.3d 392, 400 (4th Cir. 

2015). Accordingly, we grant Smith’s motion to seal his informal brief and affirm the 

district court’s order. 

Consistent with our decision in United States v. Winestock, 340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th 

Cir. 2003), we construe Smith’s notice of appeal and informal brief as an application to file 

a second or successive § 2255 motion. Upon review, we conclude that Smith’s claims do 

not meet the relevant standard. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h). We therefore deny authorization 

to file a successive § 2255 motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
#### UTICA FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. J. ROMIE SUTTON and AZILE SUTTON.

(Filed 22 May, 1957.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *Nimocks, J.,*October Term 1956 of Durham.

This is a civil action instituted by the plaintiff to recover for damages growing out of an automobile collision which occurred on South Duke Street in the City of Durham, North Carolina, about 2:50 p.m. on 14 June 1952.

An automobile belonging to the plaintiff’s insured, Thomas G. Shepherd, was parked on the west side of Duke Street near the curb, headed south, and was struck by the car of the defendant J. Romie Sutton while being driven south on Duke Street by his daughter, Azile Sutton.

Azile Sutton is a minor and no guardian *ad litem*having been appointed to represent her, only J. Romie Sutton filed answer.

The plaintiff’s evidence tends to show that at the time of the collision, Azile Sutton was driving said automobile with the permission of her father, and just before the collision she was talking to her mother, who was a passenger in the car she was driving, and looked up too late to avoid hitting the Shepherd car.

The parties stipulated that the damages to the automobile owned by the plaintiff’s insured resulting from the collision were $373.74 and the plaintiff paid its insured therefor the sum of $323.74 under the provisions of its collision policy of insurance and seeks recovery in the amount it paid out under its right of subrogation.

At the close of plaintiff’s evidence the defendant J. Romie Sutton moved for judgment as of nonsuit, and the motion was allowed.

Plaintiff appeals, assigning error.

*340
      *E. K. Powe for plaintiff appellant.*

*No counsel contra.*

PeR Curiam.

The plaintiff excepts to and assigns as error the ruling of the court below in sustaining the motion for judgment as of nonsuit.

A review of the evidence revealed by the record on appeal, including the stipulations entered into by the parties, leads us to the conclusion that the case should have been submitted to the jury. Hence, the judgment below is

Reversed.
#### S. R. IRELAND v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY.

(Filed 20 November, 1935.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *Small, J.,*at June Term, 1935, of Wayne.

Affirmed.

*J. Faison Thomson and J. M. Colton for plaintiff, appellant.*

*W. A. Townes, W. B. R. Guión, and Diclcinson & Bland for defendant, appellee.*

Per Curiam.

This action was instituted by the plaintiff to recover damages alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant in transporting a carload of lima beans and peppers from -Faison, North *853Carolina, to Cleveland, Obio; the negligence alleged being that the car furnished the plaintiff by the defendant railroad company was poorly ventilated, in bad condition, and not suitable for transporting perishable freight, and that there was unreasonable delay in the transportation of the shipment. The defendant filed answer wherein it denied the allegations of negligence in the complaint, and for further defense averred that the plaintiff was negligent in directing that the car in which the beans and peppers were shipped be not reiced after leaving Bocky Mount, North Carolina. The evidence tended to establish that the beans and peppers were received by the defendant in good condition on the night of 9 July, 1932, and reached their destination in damaged condition on 13 July, 1932.

The issues submitted and the answers made thereto were as follows:

“1. Were the plaintiff’s peppers and lima beans damaged by the negligence of the defendant, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: No.’

“2. What damage, if any, is plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendant? Answer: None.’”

From judgment based upon the verdict, the plaintiff excepted and appealed to the Supreme Court, assigning errors.

The sole question arising in this case was purely one of fact, namely, was the damage to the beans and peppers caused by the negligence of the defendant or by the negligence of the plaintiff, and was clearly presented by the issues submitted, and the jury found for the defendant.

We have carefully read the record, and, in the light of the assignments of error, are left with the impression that the case has been fairly tried upon proper issues and free from any reversible error, and that the judgment should be affirmed, and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.

DeviN, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
ex4_7-f20f12312010.htm


Exhibit 4.7


 


Summary of the Agreement to Acquire Guilin Jun Tai Fu Construction and Development Co. Ltd.


 


Hainan Jinpan Electric Co. Ltd. (“the Company”) entered into an agreement (“Agreement”) with Guilin Jin Fu Investment Co. Ltd. (“GJF”) on March 20, 2011to acquire the 100% of the equity of GJF’s wholly owned subsidiary, Guilin Jun Tai Fu Construction and Development Co. Ltd. (“JFT”).


 


The parties agreed that the Agreement would become binding if (1) JTF’s financial statements are true and clear and (2) the results of an audit or assessment by the Company’s finance or accounting personnel or by an audit firm appointed by the Company conform to the representations made in the Agreement.


 


The parties agreed that if the aforementioned conditions are not satisfied within 30 days of the signing of this Agreement, then this Agreement would become non-binding.  Furthermore, except for liquidated damages in the amount of RMB 200,000 to be paid by the party at fault for causing the Agreement to become nonbinding, neither party will assume any additional legal liability or see damages from the other party on the basis of this Agreement.


 


GJF agreed to transfer all its equity in JFT to the Company according to the terms and conditions of this Agreement.  HN JST agreed to accept the transfer of all the equity in JFT from GJF according to the terms and conditions of this Agreement.  After the transfer, the Company would own 100% of the equity of JFT and have all the corresponding shareholder rights.


 


The parties agreed thatthe Company would pay GJF a purchase price of RMB 15,000,000 in exchange for 100% of the equity of JFT.


 


The parties agreed that withinseven (7) business days of the execution of the Agreement, GJF would complete the following:


 



	 	
·   Assist and cooperate with the Company to complete documentation of the equity transfer according to applicable laws, regulations, and JFT’s corporate articles;


	 	
·   Work with the Company to register the transfer of JFT with applicable government agencies;


	 	
·   Transfer to the Company all its management rights in JFT;


	 	
·   Provide to the Company all corporate records and documents, as specified in the Agreement;


	 	  





The parties agreed that within 30 business days of the execution of the Agreement the Company shall pay GJF 90% of the Purchase Price.  The parties further agreed that the Company will pay the balance of the purchase price within 30 business days of completing change of the records of business registration of JFT.


 


The Company paid the purchase price in full to GJF on April 21, 2011 and the parties closed on the Agreement.
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, James Joyce, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-KSB/A of Aethlon Medical, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: September 8, 2004


                  /S/ JAMES A. JOYCE
                  ---------------------------
                  JAMES A. JOYCE
                  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER