alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Industrial Enterprises
      of
      America, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to
      such officer’s knowledge, that this Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s quarterly
      report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (this "Amendment
      No.
      1”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
      contained in this Amendment No. 1 fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for,
      the
      period presented in this Amendment No. 1.





Dated: **September
      20, 2006**





/s/
      James W. Margulies


**James
      W. Margulies**


Chief
      Financial Officer














The
      foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350 and is not being filed as part of this Amendment No. 1 or as a separate
      disclosure document.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.0

                                  ORCAD, INC.

             STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                     (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

  Basic net income per share for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and
1995 were computed based on the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding. Common shares for the year ended December 31, 1995 include shares
of Series A Preferred Stock that were converted into common shares upon
consummation of OrCAD's initial public offering. To determine diluted net
income per share, equivalent shares of common stock outstanding were included
based on outstanding options using the treasury stock method.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
                                                                  31,
                                                          ---------------------
                                                           1997    1996   1995
                                                          ------  ------  -----
     <S>                                                  <C>     <C>     <C>
     Shares used in basic net income per share...........  6,737   6,190  1,584
                                                          ------  ------  -----
     Series A preferred stock............................    --      --   2,307
     Common stock equivalents............................    382     526    534
     Tax benefit of non-qualified stock options..........   (101)    (98)   --
                                                          ------  ------  -----
     Shares used in diluted net income per share.........  7,018   6,618  4,425
     Net income.......................................... $1,597  $4,202  $ 315
     Basic net income per share.......................... $  .24  $  .68  $ .20
                                                          ======  ======  =====
     Diluted net income per share........................ $  .23  $  .63  $ .07
                                                          ======  ======  =====
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 25 (Tuesday, February 7, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 7287]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3151]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD

TIME AND PLACE: 9:30 a.m., Tuesday, February 14, 1995.

PLACE: The Board Room, 5th Floor, 490 L'Enfant Plaza, S.W., Washington, 
D.C. 20594.

STATUS: The first three items are open to the public. The last item is 
closed under Exemption 10 of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

    6321A  Railroad Accident Report: Derailment of the Ringling 
Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus Blue Train, Lakeland, Florida, 
January 13, 1994.
    6521  Aircraft Accident Report: Runway Departure Following 
Rejected Takeoff, Continental Airlines Flight 795, McDonnell Douglas 
MD-82, N18835, LaGuardia Airport, Flushing, New York, March 2, 1994.
    6514  Recommendations to Federal Aviation Administration, U.S. 
Coast Guard, National Association of State Boating Law 
Administrators, and the Seaplane Pilots Association Concerning 
Seaplane Operations in Navigable Waters.
    6354A  Opinion and Order: Administrator v. Bielecki, et al., 
Dockets SE-9244-9249; disposition of respondents' appeals.

NEWS MEDIA CONTACT: Telephone: (202) 382-0660.

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: Bea Hardesty, (202) 382-6525.

    Dated: February 3, 1995.
Bea Hardesty,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-3151 Filed 2-3-95; 2:40 pm]
BILLING CODE 7533-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 28, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 10819]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4892]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Ch. I

[FRL-5162-5]


Open Meeting of the Negotiated Rulemaking Advisory Committee for 
Small Nonroad Engine Regulations

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: FACA committee meeting; Negotiated rulemaking on small nonroad 
engine regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As required by section 9(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), EPA is giving notice of the next 
meeting of the Advisory Committee to negotiate a rule to reduce air 
emissions from small nonroad engines. The meeting is open to the public 
without advance registration. The purpose of the meeting is to continue 
identification and discussion of issues, discuss interests of committee 
members, and hear reports from task groups.

DATES: The committee will meet on March 21 and 22, 1995 from 10 a.m. to 
6 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The location of the meeting will be the Holiday Inn East, 
3750 Washtenaw, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, (313) 971-2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Persons needing further information on the technical and substantive 
matters of the rule should contact Betsy McCabe, National Vehicle and 
Fuel Emissions Laboratory, 2565 Plymouth Rd., Ann Arbor Michigan 48105, 
(313) 668-4344. Persons needing further information on committee 
procedes should call Deborah Dalton, Consensus and Dispute Resolution 
Program, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20460, (202) 260-5495, or the Committee's facilitator, 
Lucy More or John Folk-Williams, Western Network, 616 Don Gaspar, Santa 
Fe, New Mexico 87501, (505) 982-9805.

    Dated: February 23, 1995.
Deborah Dalton,
Designated Federal Official, Deputy Director, Consensus and Dispute 
Resolution Program.
[FR Doc. 95-4892 Filed 2-27-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1645

EQI, Ltd: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 2, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52-56]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31549]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Base Closure and Community Redevelopment and Homeless Assistance 
Act; Base Realignments and Closures

AGENCY: Economic Security, Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice provides a partial list of closing or realigning 
military installations pursuant to the 1995 Defense Base Closure and 
Realignment (BRAC) Report, and the points of contacts, addresses, and 
telephone numbers for the Local Redevelopment Authorities (LRAs) for 
those installations. Representatives of state and local governments and 
homeless providers interested in the reuse of an installation should 
contact the person or organization listed. The following information 
will be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the area of 
each installation. There will be additional Notices providing this same 
information about the LRAs for other closing or realigning 
installations as those LRAs are recognized by the Office of Economic 
Adjustment (OEA).

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 2, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Helene O'Connor, Office of Assistant 
Secretary of Defense for Economic Security, Office of Economic 
Adjustment, 400 Army Navy Drive, Suite 200, Arlington, VA 22202 (703) 
604-5905.

    Dated: December 27, 1995.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

BILLING CODE 5000-04-M

[[Page 53]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN02JA96.003



[[Page 54]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN02JA96.004



[[Page 55]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN02JA96.005



[[Page 56]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN02JA96.006



[FR Doc. 95-31549 Filed 12-29-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-C
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3966 

To amend the Securities Act of 1933 to define secondary offerings of Regulation A tier 2 securities as covered securities for purposes of an exemption 

from State regulation, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 30, 2022 

Mr. MORAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Securities Act of 1933 to define secondary 

offerings of Regulation A tier 2 securities as covered 

securities for purposes of an exemption from State regulation, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Facilitating Main 

5 Street Offerings Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3966 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM STATE REGULATION OF SECURI2 TIES. 

3 Section 18(b)(4)(A) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 

4 U.S.C. 77r(b)(4)(A)) is amended by inserting ‘‘or pursu5 ant to all disclosure obligations of section 3(b)(2) of this 

6 Act and any regulations issued under that section’’ before 

7 the semicolon. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### Sam Brooslin *vs.*Louis Cohn.

Hampden.

January 6, 1930.

January 8, 1930.

Present: Rugg, C.J., Crosby, Carroll, Sanderson, *&*Field, JJ.

*Practice, Civil,*Conduct of trial.

At the trial of an action of tort by one riding in an automobile of the defendant, for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through the negligence of the defendant, the plaintiff testified that he had requested the defendant not to drive the automobile so fast. A witness for the defendant, who was with him in the automobile, stated, in answer to a question, whether he had heard the plaintiff make such request, that he did not remember whether the plaintiff had said it or not. The trial judge then asked the witness “if he did not think he would remember if the plaintiff had said it.” It did not appear that the question was answered. *Held,*that, whether the question was answered or not, no error prejudicial to the plaintiff was shown: the judge was within his rights in asking it.

Tort. Writ dated November 14, 1927.

At the trial in the Superior Court before *Greenhalge,*J., the plaintiff testified that he requested the defendant not to drive his automobile so fast. Other material evidence and a question, asked by the judge of a witness who had been riding in the automobile with the plaintiff and the defendant, are stated in the opinion. The jury found for the defendant and the plaintiff alleged an exception to the question by the judge.

The case was submitted on briefs.

*H. A. Moran,*for the plaintiff.

*W. J. Granfield & J. M. Noonan,*for the defendant.

Rugg, C.J.

This is an action of tort to recover compensation for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff, while riding in the motor vehicle of the defendant, through the negligence of the latter. A witness called by the defendant, in answer to a question whether he heard the plaintiff request the defendant to go slowly, said that he did not know whether it was said or *39not. The presiding judge asked the witness, in substance, "if he did not think he would remember if the plaintiff had said it. To this remark the plaintiff duly excepted, claiming that it was prejudicial.” Apparently the question was not answered. Whether this be regarded as an unanswered inquiry or whether it be assumed that it was answered, no error is disclosed. The presiding judge had a right to put the question. *Palmer*v. *White,*10 Cush. 321. *Sherman*v. *Sherman,*193 Mass. 400. *Benuliewicz*v. Berger, 245 Mass. 137, 139.

*Exceptions overruled.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Form 10Q
Filing at June 30, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000


<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                           JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         285
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                               22,851
<ALLOWANCES>                                 4,259
<INVENTORY>                                  1,406
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,764
<PP&E>                                      15,562
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,685
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             362,369
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       34,798
<BONDS>                                    217,100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         1
<OTHER-SE>                                  50,521
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               362,369
<SALES>                                     66,039
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            66,039
<CGS>                                       41,305
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               67,745
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          11,980
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (13,686)
<INCOME-TAX>                                (1,675)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (12,011)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (12,011)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 28, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 10826]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4846]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 95-27, RM-8582]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Yazoo City, Mississippi

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission requests comments on a petition filed by 
Mississippi College, licensee of Station WHJT(FM), Channel 228A, 
Clinton, Mississippi, proposing the deletion of vacant Channel 229A at 
Yazoo City, Mississippi. Any party wishing to express an interest in 
Channel 229A Yazoo City, Mississippi, should file their expression of 
interest by the initial comment deadline specified herein.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before April 17, 1995, and reply 
comments on or before May 2, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, D.C. 20554. 
In addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner, or its counsel or consultant, as follows: Shaun 
A. Maher, Smithwick & Belediuk, P.C., 1990 M Street, NW, Suite 510, 
Washington, D.C. 20036 (Counsel for petitioner).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 95-27, adopted February 
9, 1995, and released February 23, 1995. The full text of this 
Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during 
normal business hours in the FCC's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M 
Street, NW, Washington, D.C. The complete text of this decision may 
also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, ITS, Inc., 
(202) 857-3800, 2100 M Street, NW, Suite 140, Washington, D.C. 20037.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 95-4846 Filed 2-27-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
<PAGE>


                                 EXHIBIT 23.2

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our report
dated February 27, 2001, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, into PTEK
HOLDINGS, INC.'s previously filed Registration Statements (Files Nos. 333-51380,
333-11281, 333-17593, 333-29787, 333-36557, 333-39693, 333-52357, 333-79599,
333-87635-333-89891, 333-67292, and 333-57698). It should be noted that we have
not audited any financial statements of the Company subsequent to December 31,
2000 or performed any audit procedures subsequent to the date of our report.

/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP


Atlanta, Georgia
March 27, 2002
EXHIBIT 3.3


                    CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                OF
                    CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                OF
                   AMERICAN DISPOSAL SERVICES, INC.

     The undersigned corporation, in order to amend its Restated
Certificate of Incorporation, hereby certifies as follows:

     FIRST: The name of the corporation (the "Corporation") is:

AMERICAN DISPOSAL SERVICES, INC.

     SECOND: The Corporation hereby amends its Restated
Certificate of Incorporation as follows:

     The first paragraph of Article FOURTH is hereby amended in
its entirety to read as follows:

          "FOURTH: The total number of shares of capital stock
          which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is
          sixty-five million (65,000,000) shares, consisting of
          sixty million (60,000,000) shares of common stock, par
          value one cent ($0.01) per share ("Common Stock"), and
          five million (5,000,000) shares of preferred stock, par
          value one cent ($0.01) per share ("Preferred Stock")."

     THIRD: The amendment to the Corporation's Certificate of
Incorporation was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions
of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, AMERICAN DISPOSAL SERVICES, INC. has
caused this certificate to be signed and attested by its duly
authorized officer, this 7th day of October, 1997.

                              AMERICAN DISPOSAL SERVICES, INC.


                              By:        /s/ Ann L. Straw
                                         Ann L. Straw
                                          Vice President
ATTEST:

 /s/ Stephen W. Rubin

Stephen W. Rubin
Assistant Secretary
Stephen W. Rubin