alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 6/26/96 TENTH CIRCUIT
LAUREN HELLMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. ROBERT L. HAYS, ETTA J. HAYS, DAN D. STUART, PETER W. BOOTH, REBECCA S. BROMLEY, TED SHONTS, SHARON SHIPLEY, ARDIS W. SCHMIDT, JOHN ANDERSON, DOES I through XX, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-1543 (D.C. No. 95-S-2072) (D. Colo.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, KELLY, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges. **
Mr. Hellman appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his complaint and action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). The December 21, 1995, notice of appeal was timely filed because the district court’s order of dismissal was not entered on the docket until- 2 -

November 21, 1995. See I R. doc. 22 at 9; Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the action. See Denton v. Hernandez , 504 U.S. 25 (1992). AFFIRMED. All pending motions are DENIED. The mandate shall issue forthwith. Entered for the Court Paul J. Kelly, Jr. Circuit Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          30,530
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  429,993
<ALLOWANCES>                                   134,556
<INVENTORY>                                     15,185
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               383,427
<PP&E>                                         216,266
<DEPRECIATION>                                  56,038
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,118,581
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          170,481
<BONDS>                                        323,112
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       389,712
<OTHER-SE>                                      61,991
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,118,581
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               766,325
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  684,593
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,463
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,114
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 59,155
<INCOME-TAX>                                    22,775
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             36,380
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    36,380
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .60


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

MICHAEL T. LANE NO. 2024 CW 0096

VERSUS

CHUNJING ZHANG MAY 20, 2024

In Re: Chunjing Zhang, applying for supervisory writs, Family

Court in and for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 

221, 723. 

BEFORE: McCLENDON, HESTER, AND MILLER, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. 

McClendon, J., concurs. The criteria set forth in Herlitz

Const. Co., Inc. v. Hotel Investors of New Iberia, Inc., 396

So. 2d 878 ( La. 1981) ( per curiam), are not met. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Columbia Plateau Conservation Research Center: Pendleton, OR
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Related TopicsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Pendleton, Oregon Columbia Plateau Conservation Research Center Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Research Projects Subjects of Investigation at this LocationEach ARS research project has related subjects of investigation.  Listed below are the subjects of investigation currently conducted at this location.
Clicking on a subject of investigation will list the research projects within that  subject of investigation.Subjects of Investigation
                            Climate
                                Fertilizers
                                Flax
                                Microorganisms, general/other
                                Peas (dry)
                                Soft white wheat (includes club, western)
                                Soil
                                Soil and land, general
                                The farm as an enterprise
                                Water resources
                                Weeds


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
**Exhibit 32.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION**
 
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Industrial Enterprises of America, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the "Form 10-QSB") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-QSB.
 
 
 
 Dated: December 31 , 2004
 
 /s/ John D. Mazzuto
 John D. Mazzuto, Chief Financial
 Officer, Vice Chairman of the Board and Assistant Secretary
 
 
 
 The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 19-1995

___________________________

Matthew Boivin

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Asa Hutchinson, Arkansas Governor, Individually and in Official Capacities;

Benny Magness, Director-- Board of Correction, Individually and in Official

Capacities; Wendy Kelley, Director-- Department of Correction, Individually and

in Official Capacities

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock

 ____________

 Submitted: January 15, 2020

Filed: January 21, 2020

[Unpublished]

____________

Before GRUENDER, BEAM, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
Arkansas inmate Matthew Boivin appeals the district court’s

1

dismissal of his

pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. After careful review of the record and the parties’

arguments on appeal, we conclude that dismissal was proper. See Kelly v. City of

Omaha, 813 F.3d 1070, 1075 (8th Cir. 2016) (reviewing Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)

dismissal de novo). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

1The Honorable Billy Roy Wilson, United States DistrictJudge for the Eastern

District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable

Patricia S. Harris, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

-2-
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 22, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9852]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4244]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Meeting

    Pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, notice is hereby given of the meeting 
of the Acrylonitrile Study Advisory Panel, National Cancer Institute, 
National Institutes of Health, on Friday March 24, 1995. The meeting 
will be held in Conference Room H, Executive Plaza North, 6130 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, Maryland 20892.
    This meeting will be open to the public from 10 am to 5 pm for 
discussion and review of study progress. Attendance by the public will 
be limited to space available.
    Ms. Carole A. Frank, Committee Management Officer, National Cancer 
Institute, Executive Plaza North, Room 630, National Institutes of 
Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 (301/496-5708) will provide summaries 
of the meeting and rosters of committee members, upon request.
    Dr. Aaron Blair, Executive Secretary, Division of Cancer Etiology, 
National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Executive 
Plaza North, Room 418, 6130 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, Maryland 
20892 (301/496-9093) will furnish substantive program information.
    Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as 
sign language interpretation or other special accommodations, should 
contact Dr. Aaron Blair, (301) 496-9093, in advance of the meeting.

    Dated: February 15, 1995.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, National Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. 95-4244 Filed 2-21-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM APPLICABLE
1997 ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS OF PUERTO RICO, INC.
THE  SCHEDULE IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                   JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                     DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             9,445,000
<SECURITIES>                                         235,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                     21,149,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (2,106,000)
<INVENTORY>                                        2,882,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   5,923,000
<PP&E>                                           178,231,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (49,780,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   332,124,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             47,239,000
<BONDS>                                          200,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                        75,429,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     332,124,000
<SALES>                                           16,612,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 148,494,000
<CGS>                                             19,089,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     34,038,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  70,160,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                19,400,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (2,581,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        (871,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (3,452,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (3,326,000)
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (6,778,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0


</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-11487

Universal Electronics, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-11436

Carefree of Colorado: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXHIBIT 32.2






CFO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO






SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)






In connection with Form 10-Q of POZEN Inc. (the “Company”) , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, William L. Hodges, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:











1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
















Date:           May 5, 2011/s/  William L. HodgesWilliam L. HodgesChief Financial Officer

















































A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>            5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
condensed consolidated balance sheets and the condensed, consolidated
statements of operation of Forever Enterprises, Inc. filed as part
of Forever Enterprises, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2000, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such report.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      25,712,098
<SECURITIES>                                76,293,012
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,683,358
<ALLOWANCES>                                    11,117
<INVENTORY>                                    378,107
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           128,650,816
<PP&E>                                       5,407,565
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,101,996
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             171,064,994
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,943,292
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        69,321
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,606,994
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               171,064,994
<SALES>                                     35,157,561
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            43,010,665
<CGS>                                          462,730
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               45,571,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               212,061
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             143,257
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,491,931)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (330,562)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,161,368)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,161,368)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.31)


</TABLE>
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

OCT 14 1997

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

JOE T. BELL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

TOM WHETHEL,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 97-6126

(D.C. No. 96-CV-2093)

(Western District of Oklahoma)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, PORFILIO and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this

appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered

submitted without oral argument.
- 2 -

Joe Thomas Bell appeals the dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983

civil action for failure to pay an installment of the filing fee established for him by the

court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). The court’s investigation prior to dismissing the

action showed Mr. Bell apparently spent his prison account on “canteen” rather than meet

the installments ordered by the court. The court concluded Mr. Bell was not serious about

his suit and dismissed as a consequence.

Mr. Bell has appealed, presenting documents to us indicating the failure to pay the

required fee may have been caused by his jailers and that money had been drawn from

Mr. Bell’s account but not paid to the court. For numerous, but really irrelevant reasons,

he asserts the dismissal by the district court was erroneous.

Our reading of the provisions of the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act leaves us in

grave doubt whether a district court may dismiss a prisoner’s case for failure to pay an

installment of the docket fee. While the court relied on cases from other circuits to

support its action, those cases antedated the PLRA and are not apposite.

The only statutory grounds for dismissal of the in forma pauperis action are set

forth in § 1915(e)(2). None of those provisions are related to the nonpayment of fees. In

the absence of statutory authority, dismissal for that reason is contrary to § 1915(b)(4)

which prohibits the denial of access to the court on the grounds of poverty. See Walp v.

Scott, 115 F.3d 308, 310 (5th Cir 1997).
- 3 -

Dismissal of the complaint was at worst, however, premature. The grounds for

relief appear tenuous, and upon further determination by the district court, may even

prove baseless. Nonetheless, we must REVERSE and REMAND WITH

INSTRUCTIONS to reinstate the action.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

John C. Porfilio

Circuit Judge

Judge Murphy dissents.