12752 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 8, 1995 / Notices

service under Rate Schedule FS.

Transco states that eight out of ten

customers declined to convert their

service and the remaining two

customers verbally confirmed their

election not to convert.

Transco states that even though it

believes it to be clear that the

Commission contemplated that the oneyear cost-based sales service to small

customers, as embodied in Transco’s

Rate Schedule FS-G, would terminate

automatically, Section 6 of Rate

Schedule FS-G, as approved by the

Commission, states that ‘‘* * * [s]ervice

under this Rate Schedule is subject to

the abandonment requirements of

Section 7(b) of the Natural Gas Act.’’

Accordingly, Transco requests

authorization to abandon all service

under its Rate Schedule FS-G and

requests that such abandonment be

made effective November 1, 1994.

Transco states that the subject

application is the result of and

consistent with Article II of Transco’s

Rate Schedule FS-G service agreements

and with the provisions of Order No.

636, both of which clearly viewed

service under Rate Schedule FS-G to be

interim service available only for a

period of one year.

Comment date: March 22, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph F

at the end of this notice.

4. Mississippi River Transmission Corp.

[Docket No. CP95–228–000]

Take notice that on February 27, 1995,

Mississippi River Transmission

Corporation (MRT), 9900 Clayton Road,

St. Louis, Missouri 63124, filed in

Docket No. CP95–228–000 an

application pursuant to Sections 7(c)

and 7(b) of the Natural Gas Act to

construct and abandon facilities

necessary to modernize and improve the

reliability of its Main Line System, all

as more fully set forth in the application

which is on file with the Commission

and open to public inspection.

MRT states because of safety, system

reliability and increasing operating cost

concerns, MRT is proposing to

implement the first portion of a 16-year

system modernization program. MRT

proposes in the first phase of the

program to add compression at its

Biggers and Tuckerman Compressor

Stations, retire certain compressor

engines at these compressor stations,

and retire approximately 93 miles of its

Main Line No. 1. It is indicated that, as

a consequence of these additions and

abandonments, MRT would also need to

reconfigure the station piping at its

Biggers, Tuckerman and Diaz

Compressor Stations, and relocate

interconnections serving 13 delivery

points to other main line facilities.

MRT estimates construction costs

during 1995 of $6.7 million and during

1996 of $7.2 million, to be financed

with internally generated funds. MRT

states that the proposed construction

and abandonment would not affect the

capacity of its Main Line System and

would not affect service to any existing

customer.

Comment date: March 22, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph F

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs:

F. Any person desiring to be heard or

to make any protest with reference to

said application should on or before the

comment date, file with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission,

Washington, D.C. 20426, a motion to

intervene or a protest in accordance

with the requirements of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211)

and the Regulations under the Natural

Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). All protests

filed with the Commission will be

considered by it in determining the

appropriate action to be taken but will

not serve to make the protestants parties

to the proceeding. Any person wishing

to become a party to a proceeding or to

participate as a party in any hearing

therein must file a motion to intervene

in accordance with the Commission’s

Rules.

Take further notice that, pursuant to

the authority contained in and subject to

the jurisdiction conferred upon the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

by Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas

Act and the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure, a hearing will

be held without further notice before the

Commission or its designee on this

application if no motion to intervene is

filed within the time required herein, if

the Commission on its own review of

the matter finds that a grant of the

certificate and/or permission and

approval for the proposed abandonment

are required by the public convenience

and necessity. If a motion for leave to

intervene is timely filed, or if the

Commission on its own motion believes

that a formal hearing is required, further

notice of such hearing will be duly

given.

Under the procedure herein provided

for, unless otherwise advised, it will be

unnecessary for applicant to appear or

be represented at the hearing.

G. Any person or the Commission’s

staff may, within 45 days after issuance

of the instant notice by the Commission,

file pursuant to Rule 214 of the

Commission’s Procedural Rules (18 CFR

385.214) a motion to intervene or notice

of intervention and pursuant to Section

157.205 of the Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a

protest to the request. If no protest is

filed within the time allowed therefor,

the proposed activity shall be deemed to

be authorized effective the day after the

time allowed for filing a protest. If a

protest is filed and not withdrawn

within 30 days after the time allowed

for filing a protest, the instant request

shall be treated as an application for

authorization pursuant to Section 7 of

the Natural Gas Act.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–5622 Filed 3–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Docket No. RP95–115–002]

CNG Transmission Corp.; Notice of

Compliance Filing

March 2, 1995.

Take notice that on February 27, 1995,

CNG Transmission Corporation (CNG)

pursuant to Section 4 of the Natural Gas

Act, Section 154.63 of the Commission’s

Regulations, and the Commission’s

January 27, 1995, order in the

referenced proceeding (Suspension

Order), filed the following proposed

changes to its FERC Gas Tariff, Second

Revised Volume No. 1, to become

effective on February 1, 1995:

Substitute Sixth Revised Sheet No. 32

Substitute Sixth Revised Sheet No. 33

The Suspension Order accepted and

suspended CNG’s filing, allowing CNG’s

tariff sheets to become effective, subject

to refund, and subject to three

conditions: (1) CNG was required to

provide an explanation of its agreement

with Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line

Corporation (Transco); (2) CNG was

required to provide an explanation of its

proposed exclusion of FTY-GSS and

FTNN–GSS customers from operation of

the Account No. 858 component of the

stranded cost surcharge; and (3) CNG

was required to provide work papers

that detail the derivation of its billing

determinants.

CNG states that its filing complies

with each of the three conditions. In

partial response to the Commission’s

second condition, CNG’s filing would

revise its tariff sheets to require its FT–

GSS and FTNN–GSS customers to pay

the Account No. 858 component of the

stranded cost surcharge.

CNG states that it has posted and

served its filing in accordance with the

Commission’s regulations.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest said filing should file a protest
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 8, 1995 / Notices 12753

1Notice of a transaction does not constitute a

determination that the terms and conditions of the

proposed service will be approved or that the

noticed filing is in compliance with the

Commission’s regulations.

with the Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission, 825 North Capitol Street,

N.E., Washington, DC 20426, in

accordance with Rules 214 and 211 of

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR Section 385.214 and

385.211). All motions or protests should

be filed on or before March 9, 1995.

Protests will be considered by the

Commission in determining the

appropriate action to be taken, but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceeding. Any person wishing to

become a party must file a motion to

intervene. Copies of this filing are on

file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–5599 Filed 3–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket Nos. CP92–182–007 and RP95–103–

000]

Florida Gas Transmission Co.; Notice

of Rescheduling of Technical

Conference

March 2, 1995.

The Commission previously an order

in the captioned proceeding establishing

a technical conference to be held on

March 22, 1994, regarding Florida Gas

Transmission Company’s proposed

changes to its operating conditions. At

the request of several interested parties

the conference is rescheduled for 10:00

a.m. Thursday, March 23, 1995, at 810

First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C., in

a room to be designated at that time.

Any questions concerning the

conference should be directed to John

M. Robinson (202) 208–0808, or Kerry

Noone (202) 208–0285.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–5594 Filed 3–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. RP94–93–006]

K N Interstate Gas Transmission Co.;

Notice of Revised Compliance Filing

March 2, 1995.

Take notice that on February 27, 1995,

K N Interstate Gas Transmission Co.

(KNI) tendered for filing revised tariff

sheets in compliance with the

Commission’s February 10, 1995 Letter

Order in the referenced proceeding. KNI

states that the tariff sheets reflect

revised pagination and correction of a

typographical error.

KNI states that copies of the filing

were served upon each person

designated on the official service list

compiled by the Secretary in this

proceeding.

Any person desiring to protest said

filing should file a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street NE.,

Washington, DC 20426, in accordance

with Section 385.211 of the

Commission’s Rules and Regulations.

All such protests should be filed on or

before March 9, 1995. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make any

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Copies of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection in the Public Reference

Room.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–5596 Filed 3–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. RP95–111–001]

Northwest Pipeline Corp., Notice of

Compliance Report

March 2, 1995.

Take notice that on February 27, 1995,

Northwest Pipeline Corporation

(Northwest), tendered for filing with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

(Commission) a report in the above

referenced docket.

Northwest states that the purpose of

this filing is to comply with the

Commission’s letter order issued

January 27, 1995 in Docket No. RP95–

111–000 (Order). On December 29,

1994, Northwest proposed to direct bill

the Account No. 191 amounts listed on

Second Revised Sheet No. 292 to its

Converting Customers. This tariff sheet

was accepted subject to refund and

conditions. The Order requires

Northwest to show how the $17,955

debited to its Account No. 191 and

included in the amounts listed on

Second Revised Sheet No. 292 ties to

the refund report accepted in Docket

No. TM91–6–37–004.

Northwest states that a copy of this

filing has been served upon each of

Northwest’s affected former

jurisdictional sales customers, upon all

intervenors in Docket No. RP95–111–

000, and upon relevant state regulatory

commissions.

Any person desiring to protest said

filing should file a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, NE.,

Washington, DC 20426, in accordance

with Section 385.211 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure. All such protests should be

filed on or before March 9, 1995.

Protests will be considered by the

Commission in determining the

appropriate action to be taken, but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceeding. Copies of this filing are

on file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection in the

Public Reference Room.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–5598 Filed 3–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. RP94–325–000]

Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.;

Notice of Informal Settlement

Conference

March 2, 1995.

Take notice that an informal

settlement conference will be convened

in this proceeding on Thursday, March

9, 1995, at 10 a.m., at the offices of the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, NE.,

Washington, DC, for the purpose of

exploring the possible settlement of the

above-referenced docket.

Any party, as defined by 18 CFR

385.102(c), or any participant as defined

in 18 CFR 385.102(b), is invited to

attend. Persons wishing to become a

party must move to intervene and and

receive intervenor status pursuant to the

Commission’s regulations (18 CFR

385.214).

For additional information, please

contact J. Carmen Gastilo, (202) 208–

2182 or Kathleen M. Dias, (202) 208–

0524.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–5597 Filed 3–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket Nos. ST95–1081–000 et al.]

Rocky Mountain Natural Gas Co.;

Notice of Self-Implementing

Transactions

March 1, 1995.

Take notice that the following

transactions have been reported to the

Commission as being implemented

pursuant to Part 284 of the

Commission’s Regulations, Sections 311

and 312 of the Natural Gas Policy Act

of 1978 (NGPA) and Section 7 of the

NGA and Section 5 of the Outer

Continental Shelf Lands Act.1