alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 37 (Friday, February 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10374-10375]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4488]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Science Board Task Force on Readiness, Phase II

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee Meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Readiness, Phase II 
will meet in closed session on April 18, 1995 at the Pentagon, 
Arlington, VA.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense through the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and 
Technology) on scientific and technical matters as they affect the 
perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At this meeting the Task 
Force will provide advice, recommendations, and supporting rationale on 
the components of a Readiness Early Warning System to insure that our 
forces do not become ``hollow,'' and, where deficiencies may begin to 
emerge, to suggest corrective actions.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, P.L. No. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II, (1988)), it has 
been determined that this DSB Task Force meeting concerns matters 
listed in 5 U.S.C. [[Page 10375]] 552b(c) (1) (1988), and that 
accordingly this meeting will be closed to the public.

    Dated: February 17, 1995.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 95-4488 Filed 2-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 40 (Wednesday, March 1, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11068-11069]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4885]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Opportunity To Comment on the Applicant for the Enid (OK) Area

AGENCY: Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration 
(GIPSA), USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: GIPSA requests comments on the applicant for designation to 
provide official services in the geographic area currently assigned to 
Enid Grain Inspection Company, Inc. (Enid).

DATES: Comments must be postmarked, or sent by telecopier (FAX) or 
electronic mail by March 31, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Comments must be submitted in writing to Janet M. Hart, 
Chief, Review Branch, Compliance Division, GIPSA, USDA, Room 1647 
[[Page 11069]] South Building, P.O. Box 96454, Washington, DC 20090-
6454. SprintMail users may respond to [A:ATTMAIL,O:USDA,ID:A36JHART]. 
ATTMAIL and FTS2000MAIL users may respond to !A36JHART. Telecopier 
(FAX) users may send comments to the automatic telecopier machine at 
202-720-1015, attention: Janet M. Hart. All comments received will be 
made available for public inspection at the above address located at 
1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., during regular business hours.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janet M. Hart, telephone 202-720-8525.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    This action has been reviewed and determined not to be a rule or 
regulation as defined in Executive Order 12866 and Departmental 
Regulation 1512-1; therefore, the Executive Order and Departmental 
Regulation do not apply to this action.
    In the January 3, 1994, Federal Register (59 FR 61868), GIPSA asked 
persons interested in providing official services in the geographic 
area assigned to Enid to submit an application for designation. Enid, 
the only applicant, applied for designation to provide official 
inspection services in the entire area currently assigned to them.
    GIPSA is publishing this notice to provide interested persons the 
opportunity to present comments concerning Enid. Commenters are 
encouraged to submit reasons and pertinent data for support or 
objection to the designation of Enid. All comments must be submitted to 
the Compliance Division at the above address. Comments and other 
available information will be considered in making a final decision. 
GIPSA will publish notice of the final decision in the Federal 
Register, and GIPSA will send the applicant written notification of the 
decision.

    Authority: Pub. L. 94-582, 90 Stat. 2867, as amended (7 U.S.C. 
71 et seq.)

    Dated: February 15, 1995
Neil E. Porter
Director, Compliance Division
[FR Doc. 95-4885 Filed 2-28-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-EN-F
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

October 18, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1866

Lantec Products Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1046

Weastec, Inc:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_5-30-2019.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-11439

Carefree of Colorado: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7298
BEVERLY DOREATHA HAMPTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus VIRGINIA CORRECTIONAL CENTER FOR WOMEN, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-696-2) Submitted: December 18, 1997 Decided: January 7, 1998 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Beverly Doreatha Hampton, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing her 42U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The district court properly required exhaustion of administrative remedies under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1997e(a) (West Supp. 1997). Because Appellant did not demonstrate to the district court that she had exhausted administrative remedies or that such remedies were not available, the court's dismissal of the action, without prejudice, was not an abuse of discretion. We therefore affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LINDA LYNAUGH,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL VINCENT; STINSON

LEONARD STREET LLP,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 20

- 15363

D.C. No. 2:19

- cv

- 04643

- DJH

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Diane J. Humetewa, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2021 * *

Before: GRABER, R. NELSON, and HUNSAKER, Circuit Judges.

Linda Lynaugh appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

her action alleging Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) claims. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under

Federal Rule of Civil Pro cedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. Kwan v.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAR 19 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 20

- 15363

SanMedica Int’l , 854 F.3d 1088, 1093 (9th Cir. 2017). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Lynaugh’s action because Lynaugh

failed to allege facts sufficient to show a qualifying debt un der the FDCPA

. See

Ashcroft v. Iqbal , 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (to avoid dismissal, “a complaint must

contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is

plausible on its face” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)) ; Turner v.

Cook , 362 F.3d 1219, 1226

- 27 (9th Cir. 2004) (holding that court judgments are

not transactions under the FDCPA; a transaction under the FDCPA must involve

some kind of business dealing or consensual obligation)

.

We reject as u nsupported by the record Lynaugh’s contentions that

defendants made fraudulent misrepresentations in the district court.

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2

                     AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO MAKE WELL AGREEMENT

          This Amendment No. 1 to Make Well Agreement dated as of April 8, 1999
("Amendment") is entered into with reference to the Make Well Agreement dated as
of March 23, 1998, by and between Peter A. Morton ("Morton") in favor of Bank of
America National Trust and Savings Association, as Administrative Agent (the
"Administrative Agent") under the Loan Agreement described below, and for the
benefit of the Lenders (as defined below) party to such Loan Agreement from time
to time (as amended or otherwise supplemented or modified, the "Make Well
Agreement").

          The Administrative Agent, acting with the consent of the Lenders in
accordance with the terms of that certain Loan Agreement dated as of March 23,
1998 among Hard Rock Hotel, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Borrower"), the
lenders party thereto (the "Lenders"), and Bank of America National Trust and
Savings Association, as Administrative Agent, and Morton hereby agree to amend
the Make Well Agreement as follows:

     1.   SECTION 1. The definition of "Release Date" in Section 1 of the Make
Well Agreement is revised as follows: the reference, in each of subsections (a)
and (b) of such definition, to "5.55:1.00" shall refer instead to "5.70:1.00".

     2.   CONFIRMATION.  In all other respects, the terms of the Make Well
Agreement are hereby confirmed.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as
of the date first above written.

                                   /s/ Peter A. Morton
                                   ------------------------------
                                   Peter A. Morton, an individual

                                   BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL
                                   TRUST AND SAVINGS
                                   ASSOCIATION, as Administrative Agent


                                   By: /s/ Janice Hammond
                                      --------------------------------
                                        Janice Hammond, Vice President

By executing this Amendment in the space provided below, the Borrower consents
to the terms hereof, and agrees that it shall not take any action which is in
contravention of the terms of the Make Well Agreement, as amended by this
Amendment.

HARD ROCK HOTEL, INC., a Nevada corporation

By: /s/ Peter A. Morton
   -----------------------------------------
Title: PRESIDENT
      --------------------------------------


                                      -1-
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 29 (Friday, February 12, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7558-7559]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02908]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2016-0001]


Notice of Adjustment of Statewide Per Capita Indicator for 
Recommending a Cost Share Adjustment

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FEMA gives notice that the statewide per capita indicator for 
recommending cost share adjustments for major disasters declared on or 
after January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2016, is $137.

DATES: This notice applies to major disasters declared on or after 
January 1, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Roche, Recovery Directorate, 
Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 
20472, (202) 646-3834.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to 44 CFR 206.47, the statewide per 
capita indicator that is used to recommend an increase of the Federal 
cost share from seventy-five percent (75%) to not more than ninety 
percent (90%) of the eligible cost of permanent work under section 406 
and emergency work under section 403 and section 407 of the Robert T. 
Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act is adjusted 
annually. The adjustment to the indicator is based on the Consumer 
Price Index for All Urban Consumers published annually by the U.S. 
Department of Labor. For disasters declared on January 1, 2016, through 
December 31, 2016, the qualifying indicator is $137 per capita of state 
population.
    This adjustment is based on an increase of 0.7 percent in the 
Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers for the 12-month period 
that ended December 2015. The Bureau of Labor

[[Page 7559]]

Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor released the information on 
January 20, 2016.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2016-02908 Filed 2-11-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Ex-99.1 a)
                        REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

February 28, 2000

To the Board of Directors and Shareholder
of Bank of America, N.A.

We have examined management's assertion about compliance by BA Mortgage, LLC and
the Mortgage division of Bank of America, N.A. (collectively, the "Company"),
which together comprise an operating division of Bank of America., N.A., with
the minimum servicing standards (the "Standards") identified in the Mortgage
Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers ("USAP") as of and for the year ended December 31, 1999 included in the
accompanying management assertion, attached hereto as Exhibit I. Management is
responsible for the Company's compliance with the Standards. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's
compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
Standards and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the
Company's compliance with the Standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that, except as indicated in Exhibit I,
the Company complied with the aforementioned Standards as of and for the year
ended December 31, 1999 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLC


Ex-99.1 b)

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT


Cendant Mortgage Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion about Cendant Mortgage Corporation's
(the "Company") compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in
the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM
FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS (USAP) as of and for the year ended December 31, 1999
included in the accompanying management assertion. Management is responsible for
the Company's compliance with those standards. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance based on our
examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.


<PAGE>

Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Company complied with the
aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December
31, 1999 is fairly stated in all material respects.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche

January 28, 2000
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-11461

Legrand North & Central America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel