Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 28 / Friday, February 10, 1995 / Notices 7957

application to which the filing refers.

Any of the above-named documents

must be filed by providing the original

and the number of copies provided by

the Commission’s regulations to: The

Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission, 825 North Capitol Street,

N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426. An

additional copy must be sent to

Director, Division of Project Review,

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

Room 1027, at the above-mentioned

address. A copy of any notice of intent,

competing application or motion to

intervene must also be served upon each

representative of the Applicant

specified in the particular application.

C1. Filing and Service of Responsive

Documents—Any filings must bear in

all capital letters the title

‘‘COMMENTS’’,

‘‘RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TERMS

AND CONDITIONS’’, ‘‘PROTEST’’, OR

‘‘MOTION TO INTERVENE’’, as

applicable, and the Project Number of

the particular application to which the

filing refers. Any of the above-named

documents must be filed by providing

the original and the number of copies

provided by the Commission’s

regulations to: The Secretary, Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 825

North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington,

D.C. 20426. A copy of any motion to

intervene must also be served upon each

representative of the Applicant

specified in the particular application.

D2. Agency Comments—Federal,

state, and local agencies are invited to

file comments on the described

application. A copy of the application

may be obtained by agencies directly

from the Applicant. If an agency does

not file comments within the time

specified for filing comments, it will be

presumed to have no comments. One

copy of an agency’s must also be sent to

the Applicant’s representatives.

D7. Filing and Service of Responsive

Documents—The application is not

ready for environmental analysis at this

time; therefore, the Commission is not

now requesting comments,

recommendations, terms and

conditions, or prescriptions.

When the application is ready for

environmental analysis, the

Commission will issue a public notice

requesting comments,

recommendations, terms and

conditions, or prescriptions.

All filings must (1) bear in all capital

letters the title ‘‘PROTEST’’ or

‘‘MOTION TO INTERVENE,’’ ‘‘NOTICE

OF INTENT TO FILE COMPETING

APPLICATION,’’ or ‘‘COMPETING

APPLICATION;’’ (2) set forth in the

heading the name of the applicant and

the project number of the application to

which the filing responds; (3) furnish

the name, address, and telephone

number of the person protesting or

intervening; and (4) otherwise comply

with the requirements of 18 CFR

385.2001 through 385.2005. Any of

these documents must be filed by

providing the original and the number

of copies required by the Commission’s

regulations to: The Secretary, Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 825

North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington,

D.C. 20426. An additional copy must be

sent to Director, Division of Project

Review, Office of Hydropower

Licensing, Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission, Room 1027, at the above

address. A copy of any protest or motion

to intervene must be served upon each

representative of the applicant specified

in the particular application.

Dated: February 2, 1995, Washington, DC.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–3316 Filed 2–9–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Docket No. CP95–181–000, et al.]

Columbia Gas Transmission

Corporation, et al.; Natural Gas

Certificate Filings

February 2, 1995.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Columbia Gas Transmission

Corporation

[Docket No. CP95–181–000]

Take notice that on January 27, 1995,

Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation

(Columbia), 1700 MacCorkle Avenue,

S.E., Charleston, West Virginia 25314,

filed an application with the

Commission in Docket No. CP95–181–

000 pursuant to Section 7(b) of the

Natural Gas Act (NGA) for authorization

to abandon approximately 15.7 miles of

deteriorating pipeline facilities and for

authorization pursuant to Section 7(c) of

the NGA to construct and operate

approximately 10.9 miles of storage

pipelines and appurtenant facilities

(which would replace the abandoned

facilities) at the Coco ‘‘A’’ Storage Field

in Kanawha County, West Virginia, all

as more fully set forth in the application

which is open to the public for

inspection.

Columbia proposes to abandon

approximately 0.2 mile of 16-inch

diameter pipe, 0.8 mile of 14-inch

diameter pipe, 2.8 miles of 10-inch

diameter pipe, 2.3 miles of 8-inch

diameter pipe, 3.4 miles of 6-inch

diameter pipe, and 6.2 miles of 4-inch

pipe within the Coco ‘‘A’’ Storage Field.

Columbia proposes to replace its

abandoned facilities by constructing and

operating 3.1 miles of 20-inch diameter

pipe, 1.4 miles of 10-inch diameter pipe,

0.9 mile of 8-inch diameter pipe, 2.9

miles of 6-inch diameter pipe, and 2.7

miles of 4-inch pipe within the Coco

‘‘A’’ Storage Field. Columbia states that

it would cost approximately

$11,937,000 to construct the proposed

replacement facilities.

Columbia states that it does not

request authorization for any new or

additional service. Columbia also states

that the pipeline segments to be

replaced have become physically

deteriorated to the extent that

replacement would be advisable.

Comment date: February 23, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph F

at the end of this notice.

2. East Tennessee Natural Gas

Company

[Docket No. CP95–182–000]

Take notice that on January 30, 1995,

East Tennessee Natural Gas Company

(East Tennessee), P.O. Box 2511,

Houston, Texas 77252, filed in Docket

No. CP95–182–000 a request pursuant to

§§ 157.205 and 157.212 of the

Commission’s Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205,

157.212) for authorization to establish a

new delivery point for its firm

transportation customer, Loudon

Utilities Gas Department (Loudon)

under East Tennessee’s blanket

certificate issued in Docket No. CP82–

412–000 pursuant to Section 7 of the

Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set

forth in the request that is on file with

the Commission and open to public

inspection.

East Tennessee proposes to establish

a new delivery point at M.P. 3218D–

101+7.39 in Loudon County, Tennessee

as requested by Loudon. East Tennessee

will install, own, operate, and maintain

a 3-inch hot tap assembly and

interconnecting pipe on its existing

right-of-way. Further, East Tennessee

will install, own, operate, and maintain

a meter station and DAC equipment on

a site provided by Loudon adjacent to

East Tennessee’s right-of-way.

Comment date: March 20, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph G

at the end of this notice.

3. Florida Gas Transmission Company

[Docket No. CP95–183–000]

Take notice that on January 30, 1995,

Florida Gas Transmission company

(FGT), 1400 Smith Street, P.O. Box

1188, Houston, Texas 77251–1188, filed

in Docket No. CP95–183–000 a request

pursuant to §§ 157.205 and 157.212 of
7958 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 28 / Friday, February 10, 1995 / Notices

the Commission’s Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205 and

157.212) for authorization to construct

and operate a new delivery point and

appurtenant facilities in San Patricio

County, Texas to accommodate natural

gas deliveries to Onyx Gathering

Company, L.C. (onyx), under the blanket

certificate issued in Docket No. CP82–

553–000, pursuant to Section 7(c) of the

Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set

forth in the request which is on file with

the Commission and open to public

inspection.

FGT asserts that the proposed

delivery point will permit FGT to

accommodate natural gas deliveries on

an interruptible basis, pursuant to Part

284 of the Commission’s Regulations.

FGT states that the proposed delivery

point will be constructed on its existing

12-inch Encinal Channel Lateral. FGT

asserts that the proposed delivery point

will include a new 6-inch tap, a 6-inch

valve assembly, and any other necessary

appurtenant facilities necessary to

deliver up to 15,000 MMBtu per day to

Onyx. FGT states that Onyx will provide

the surface site for the proposed

delivery point.

FGT estimates that the total cost of the

proposed construction will be $41,487,

inclusive of tax gross-up. FGT claims

that Onyx will reimburse FGT for all

costs directly and indirectly incurred by

FGT for the construction of the

proposed delivery point. Additionally,

FGT states that Onyx will construct and

FGT will own and operate a meter tube,

electronic flow measurement

equipment, telemetry instrumentation,

and approximately 100 feet of 6-inch

connecting pipe, as well as any other

necessary facilities for Onyx to receive

up to 15,000 MMBtu per day. FGT states

that the proposed gas deliveries will not

have an impact on FGT’s peak day

delivery, however, annual deliveries

could be affected, up to 5,475,000

MMBtu. FGT notes that the ultimate

end-use of the gas will be primarily

commercial and industrial.

Comment date: March 20, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph G

at the end of this notice.

4. K N Interstate Gas Transmission

Company

[Docket No. CP95–187–000]

Take notice that on January 31, 1995,

K N Interstate Gas Transmission

Company (K N Interstate), P. O. Box

281304, 370 Van Gordon Street,

Lakewood Colorado 80228 filed, in

Docket No. CP95–187–000, an

application pursuant to Section 7(b) of

the Natural Gas Act and Part 157 of the

Commission’s Regulations for

permission and approval to abandon

three of its gas storage fields: The

pipeline, compressor, and appurtenant

facilities constituting its Adolph Storage

Field in Rush and Barton Counties,

Kansas; its Big Springs Storage Field in

WP County, Nebraska; and its

Springdale Storage Field in Logan

County, Colorado (Excess Gas Storage

Facilities), all by transfer to K N Natural

Gas, Inc. (KNNG), all as more fully set

forth in the application which is on file

with the Commission and open to

public inspection.

K N Interstate states, that, as a result

of its corporate reorganization and

restructuring of service pursuant to

Order No. 636, it no longer has

sufficient storage demand to fully utilize

all of its existing storage capacity. K N

Interstate claims that its Huntsman

Storage Field has sufficient capacity to

meet its storage requirements and that,

by abandoning the storage fields

proposed herein, it will eliminate the

expenses and inefficiencies associated

with the operation of excess storage

capacity. K N Interstate asserts that, by

abandoning the storage facilities

proposed herein, and removing all of

their associated costs from its

jurisdictional cost of service, its gas

storage service rate and the storage

component of no-notice and small

customer service rates will be reduced

by 29 percent. K N Interstate further

states that the abandonment of the

excess storage facilities will not

adversely affect the services or rates to

any shipper or other customer on its

system.

K N Interstate states that the Excess

Gas Storage Facilities would be

abandoned by transfer at net book cost

to KNNG, a subsidiary of K N Energy,

Inc., and KNNG would become

responsible for all associated costs.

K N Interstate explains that

abandonment authorization will return

the Excess Gas Storage Facilities to their

original state as a producing field, and

therefore, they would be exempt from

the Commission’s jurisdiction pursuant

to Section 1(b) of the NGA. K N

Interstate says it recognizes that, after

abandonment, no gas could be injected

for storage purposes without first

obtaining certificate authorization from

the Commission.

K N Interstate states it does not

propose to recover, now or in any future

Commission proceedings, any stranded

storage costs related to the abandoned

Excess Gas Storage Facilities pursuant

to the recovery mechanisms provided

under FERC Order No. 636, et seq. K N

Interstate further states that approval of

this application will remove from K N

Interstate and its customers all

expenses, risk, and uncertainty related

to the realignment and disposition of

the Excess Gas Storage Facilities and

will place that responsibility and

incentive on KNNG.

K N Interstate states that, within 30

days of the date of issuance of a final

Commission order approving this

abandonment application, it will make

a limited NGA Section 4 compliance

filing to put into effect the rates and

tariff sheets which are consistent with

the pro forma sheets attached to the

application.

K N Interstate indicates that when

abandonment approval is received,

some continued gas withdrawals may be

required in order to redeliver customerowned working gas from the abandoned

facilities. K N Interstate requests such

limited authorization as may be

required to operate the Excess Gas

Storage Facilities after abandonment

approval to the extent necessary to

withdraw any customer-owned working

gas quantities remaining in the facilities

at the time of abandonment. K N

Interstate asserts this will not affect the

immediate implementation of the rate

reductions.

Comment date: February 23, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph F

at the end of this notice.

5. El Paso Natural Gas Company

[Docket No. CP95–188–000]

Take notice that on January 31, 1994,

El Paso Natural Gas Company (El Paso),

Post Office Box 1492, El Paso, Texas

79978, filed in Docket No. CP95–188–

000 an application pursuant to Section

7(b) of the Natural Gas Act for

authorization to abandon by sale to

Leapartners, L.P. (Leapartners), two

segments of pipeline facilities, all as

more fully set forth in the application

which is on file with the Commission

and open to public inspection.

El Paso states that, as a part of its

ongoing review of its interstate

transmission system, it has determined

that approximately 12.9 miles of its 16-

inch Jal-El Paso ‘‘B’’ Line located in

Culbertson County, Texas and Eddy

County, New Mexico and approximately

46.4 miles of its 16-inch Jal Plant-Pecos

River Line located in Lea and Eddy

Counties, New Mexico are no longer

required for interstate transmission

service. It is indicated that, based upon

this determination, Leapartners has

agreed to purchase the two facilities for

use a part of its integrated nonjurisdictional gathering system at a price

of $236,000. El Paso states that the

proposed abandonment would not

result in or cause any interruption,

reduction, or termination of service

currently rendered by El Paso.
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 28 / Friday, February 10, 1995 / Notices 7959

Comment date: February 23, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph F

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

F. Any person desiring to be heard or

to make any protest with reference to

said application should on or before the

comment date, file with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission,

Washington, DC 20426, a motion to

intervene or a protest in accordance

with the requirements of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211)

and the Regulations under the Natural

Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). All protests

filed with the Commission will be

considered by it in determining the

appropriate action to be taken but will

not serve to make the protestants parties

to the proceeding. Any person wishing

to become a party to a proceeding or to

participate as a party in any hearing

therein must file a motion to intervene

in accordance with the Commission’s

Rules.

Take further notice that, pursuant to

the authority contained in and subject to

the jurisdiction conferred upon the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

by Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas

Act and the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure, a hearing will

be held without further notice before the

Commission or its designee on this

application if no motion to intervene is

filed within the time required herein, if

the Commission on its own review of

the matter finds that a grant of the

certificate and/or permission and

approval for the proposed abandonment

are required by the public convenience

and necessity. If a motion for leave to

intervene is timely filed, or if the

Commission on its own motion believes

that a formal hearing is required, further

notice of such hearing will be duly

given.

Under the procedure herein provided

for, unless otherwise advised, it will be

unnecessary for applicant to appear or

be represented at the hearing.

G. Any person or the Commission’s

staff may, within 45 days after issuance

of the instant notice by the Commission,

file pursuant to Rule 214 of the

Commission’s Procedural Rules (18 CFR

385.214) a motion to intervene or notice

of intervention and pursuant to

§ 157.205 of the Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a

protest to the request. If no protest is

filed within the time allowed therefor,

the proposed activity shall be deemed to

be authorized effective the day after the

time allowed for filing a protest. If a

protest is filed and not withdrawn

within 30 days after the time allowed

for filing a protest, the instant request

shall be treated as an application for

authorization pursuant to Section 7 of

the Natural Gas Act.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–3350 Filed 2–9–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Docket No. RP94–73–004]

ANR Pipeline Co.; Notice of Refund

Report

February 6, 1995.

Take notice that on January 6, 1995,

ANR Pipeline Company (ANR),

tendered for filing with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission

(Commission) its Refund Report made

pursuant to the Commission’s letter

dated September 30, 1994, in Docket

No. RP94–73–003.

ANR states that it made a refund

totalling $64,380.05, including

$2,047.18 in interest, to High Island

Offshore System (HIOS) for services at

the Grand Chenier facilities under Rate

Schedule X–64 for the period of January

1, 1994 through December 31, 1994.

Any person desiring to protest said

filing should file a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, N.E.,

Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance

with Rule 211 of the Commission’s

Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR

385.211). All such protests should be

filed on or before February 13, 1995.

Protests will be considered by the

Commission in determining the

appropriate action to be taken, but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceeding. Copies of this filing are

on file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–3318 Filed 2–9–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. RP95–153–000]

East Tennessee Natural Gas Co.,

Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC

Gas Tariff

February 6, 1995.

Take notice that on February 2, 1995,

East Tennessee Natural Gas Company

(East Tennessee), tendered for filing as

part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second

Revised Volume No. 1, the following

sheets and requested effective dates:

Tariff sheet Effective date

Third Substitute Original

Sheet No. 4.

Nov. 1, 1993.

Second Substitute First

Revised Sheet No. 4.

Jan. 1, 1994

Substitute Second Revised

Sheet No. 4.

Oct. 1, 1994

Substitute Third Revised

Sheet No. 4.

Nov. 1, 1994.

East Tennessee states that it is making

this filing pursuant to its Rate Schedule

LMS–MA, Section 1.5 which requires

East Tennessee to reflect in its nonotice, Daily Demand Service (DDS)

rates changes in the Daily Demand

Service rates of its upstream transporter,

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company

(Tennessee). East Tennessee further

states that consistent with that language,

East Tennessee seeks to revise its Daily

Variance Charge. The revised tariff

sheets reflect the increase in

Tennessee’s Rate Schedule LMS–MA

Daily Demand Service and Daily

Variance Charge rates pursuant to

Tennessee’s implementation of its cost

of service settlement in Docket Nos.

RP91–203, RP92–132 and RS92–23

(consolidated).

East Tennessee states that copies of

the filing have been mailed to all

affected customers and state regulatory

commissions.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

make any protest with reference to said

filing should file a petition to intervene

or protest with the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission, 825 North

Capitol Street, NE., Washington, DC

20426, in accordance with Sections 211

and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211

and 385.214. All such petitions or

protests should be filed on or before

February 13, 1995. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to this proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a petition to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file and available for

public inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–3319 Filed 2–9–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. ER94–1488–000]

Excel Energy Services; Correction to

Notice of Succession

February 6, 1995.

Take notice that the following

paragraph was omitted from the Notice

of Succession issued on January 25,