alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-Q FILING AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001059498
<NAME> AMERICAN LAWYER MEDIA, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             299
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,625
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,038
<INVENTORY>                                      1,431
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,117
<PP&E>                                          17,640
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,652
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 353,759
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,968
<BONDS>                                        175,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      83,875
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   353,759
<SALES>                                         97,118
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                97,118
<CGS>                                           36,828
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  102,611
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,141
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (19,634)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,517)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (17,117)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (17,117)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-51224

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FAUSTO SERRANO-VALOIS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 4:12-CR-389-1

Before JOLLY, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Fausto Serrano-Valois (Serrano) pleaded guilty to being found in the

United States following deportation. After applying a 12-level enhancement

pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(B) because of a prior conviction for drug

trafficking, the district court sentenced Serrano to a 30-month term of

imprisonment; the court did not impose a supervised release term. On appeal,

Serrano challenges the 12-level enhancement, arguing that his conviction for

conspiracy to commit a federal drug-trafficking offense under 21 U.S.C. §§ 841

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 25, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-51224 Document: 00512419274 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/25/2013
No. 12-51224

and 846 cannot serve as the basis for applying an enhancement under

§ 2L1.2(b)(1)(B). According to Serrano, because the Guidelines do not define

“conspiracy,” the court must look to the generic definition of conspiracy, which

requires an overt act, and § 846 does not require an overt act.

As Serrano concedes, his challenge is foreclosed by our decision in United

States v. Rodriguez-Escareno, 700 F.3d 751, 753-54 (5th Cir. 2012), cert. denied,

133 S. Ct. 2044 (2013), in which we rejected an identical challenge against a 16-

level enhancement under § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(i). Serrano raises the issue only to

preserve it for further review. In light of Rodriguez-Escareno, the district court

did not err at sentencing. Consequently, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 12-51224 Document: 00512419274 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/25/2013
**Exhibit 31.4**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT**

**TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Timothy E. Morris, Sr. Vice President Finance and Global Corporate Development, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of VIVUS, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2012; and

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 
| Date:   April 30, 2013 |                                                                                     |
|-----------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                        |                                                                                     |
| By:                         | /s/   TIMOTHY E. MORRIS                                                                  |   |
| Name:                       | Timothy   E. Morris                                                                      |   |
| Title:                      | *Sr. Vice President Finance and Global Corporate   Development, Chief Financial Officer* | * * |

* *

----
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Genta Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”), I, Raymond P. Warrell, Jr., M.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: March 30, 2011








/s/ RAYMOND P. WARRELL, JR., M.D.*


Name: Raymond P. Warrell, Jr., M.D.


Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer






* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Genta Incorporated and will be retained by Genta Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0278

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

DANIEL HUNTER FLANSBURG,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including November 14, 2022, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 7 2022

10/07/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0278
## Detailed Single Year Tables

- Individual Provisions
- Level of Monthly Benefits

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						B2.1: Beginning with those newly eligible for OASI benefits in 2033, multiply the PIA factors by the ratio of life expectancy at 67 for 2028 to the life expectancy at age 67 for the 4th year prior to the year of benefit eligibility. Unisex life expectancies, based on period life tables as computed by SSA's Office of the Chief Actuary, are used to determine the ratio. Disabled workers are: (a) not affected prior to normal retirement age; and (b) subject to a proportional reduction in benefits, based on the worker's years of disability, upon conversion to retired-worker beneficiary status.**

### Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program

### Summarized Estimates
SCWC

- 15

- 0000865

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI  I

________________________________________________________________

STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I, Respondent/Plaintiff

- Appellant,
vs. MATTHEW SEAN SASAI, Petitioner/Defendant

- Appellee, (CAAP

- 15

- 0000865; CASE NO. 1DCW

- 14

- 0004628)

AND

STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I, Respondent/Plaintiff

- Appellant/Cross

- Appellee,
vs. BRENT N. TANAKA, Petitioner/Defendant

- Appellee/Cross

- Appellant.

(CAAP

- 15

- 0000866; CASE NO. 1DCW

- 14

- 0005843)

_____________________________ ___________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP

- 15

- 0000865)

ORDER OF CORRECTION (By: McKenna, J.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Opinion of the Court, filed October 29, 2018, is corrected as follows:

On page 19, the Roman numeral heading “II” before “Standards of Review” shall be replaced with the Roman numeral heading “III.”

On page 20, the Roman numeral heading “III” before “Discussion” shall be replaced with the Roman numeral heading
“IV.” On page 30, l ine 17, the Roman numeral “III” shall be replaced with the Roman numeral “IV.” Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-15-0000865 02-NOV-2018 10:03 AM2 On page 36, the Roman numeral heading “IV” before “Conclusion” shall be replaced with the Roman numeral heading
“V.”
Th e Clerk of the Court is directed to take all necessary steps to notify the publishing agencies of these changes. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai  i, November 2 , 2018. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
Associate Justice
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 32 (Thursday, February 16, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9043]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3944]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service
[PRT-798920]


Receipt of Application(s) for Permit

    The following applicant has applied for a permit to conduct certain 
activities with endangered species. This notice is provided pursuant to 
Section 10(c) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 
U.S.C. 1531, et seq.)

Applicant: S. Lee Stone, Austin Parks & Recreation Department, 
Austin, Texas.

    The applicant requests a permit to include take activities for the 
black-capped vireo (Vireo atricapillus) for the purpose of scientific 
research and enhancement of propagation and survival of the species as 
prescribed by Service recovery documents.

ADDRESSES: Written data or comments should be submitted to the 
Assistant Regional Director, Ecological Services, U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 1306, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87103, and 
must be received by the Assistant Regional Director within 30 days for 
the date of this publication.
    Documents and other information submitted with this application are 
available for review, subject to the requirements of the Privacy Act 
and Freedom of Information Act, by any party who submits a written 
request for a copy of such documents to the above office within 30 days 
of the date of publication of this notice. (See ADDRESSES above.)
Susan MacMullin,
Acting Regional Director, Region 2, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
[FR Doc. 95-3944 Filed 2-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 32 (Thursday, February 16, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9048]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3890]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


[CO-930-1430-01; COC-57605]


Proposed Withdrawal; Colorado; Correction

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This order will correct an error in the land description in 
the original order.

DATE: February 16, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doris E. Chelius, 303-239-3706, BLM Colorado, 2850 Youngfield Street, 
Lakewood, Colorado 80215-7076.
    In the Notice published in 59 FR 60826-60827, November 28, 1994 on 
page 60827, first column, line 2 which reads ``T. 40 N., R. 22 W.,'' is 
hereby corrected to read ``T. 40 N., R. 11 W.,''.
Jenny L. Saunders,
Acting Chief, Branch of Realty Actions.
[FR Doc. 95-3890 Filed 2-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 248 (Wednesday, December 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 66957]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31276]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
[FV-96-353]


Information About Legislative Changes In License Fees Under The 
Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document gives notice to the public of changes in the fee 
structure of licenses under the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act 
(PACA).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: M.A. Clancy, PACA Branch, USDA, AMS, 
F&V Division, P.O. Box 96456, Room 2715-So. Bldg., Washington, D.C., 
20090-6456, 202-720-2814.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Public Law 104-48, the Perishable 
Agricultural Commodities Act Amendments of 1995, signed by President 
Clinton on November 15, 1995, restructured the license fees to be paid 
by PACA licensees. The PACA Amendments of 1995 phases out, over a 3 
year period, annual license fees for retailers and grocery wholesalers, 
and increases the base fee from $400 to $550 for all other licensees 
during that period. The $200 fee for each branch or additional business 
facility, in excess of nine, and the maximum aggregate fee of $4000 
remain unchanged, with the exception for retailers and grocery 
wholesalers noted below.
    During the phase-out period, the new license and annual renewal fee 
for retailers and grocery wholesalers will be as follows:
    A. From November 15, 1995, through November 14, 1996, $400 plus 
$200 for each branch or additional business facility operated by the 
applicant, in excess of nine. In no case shall the aggregate annual 
fees paid by any applicant exceed $4,000.
    B. From November 15, 1996 through November 14, 1997, the annual fee 
will be 75 percent of the aggregate fee paid under paragraph ``A.''
    C. From November 15, 1997 through November 14, 1998, the annual fee 
will be 50 percent of the aggregate fee paid under paragraph ``A.''
    At the end of the 3 year phase-out period, as of November 15, 1998, 
and thereafter, retailer and grocery wholesalers will not be required 
to pay license fees and new retailer and grocery wholesaler applicants 
will pay a one-time administrative fee of $100. Other licensees and new 
applicants will continue to pay $550 plus branch fees, or whatever fee 
is prescribed by the Secretary under rulemaking authority provided in 
the PACA Amendments of 1995 to cover the cost of the PACA program. 
Whether required to pay license fees or not, all licensees will 
continue to be required to file license applications or renewals.

    Dated: December 18, 1995.
Shirley R. Watkins,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Marketing and Regulatory Programs.
[FR Doc. 95-31276 Filed 12-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
 
 I, Parrish Medley, certify that:
 
 (1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-QSB of Davi Skin, Inc.;
 (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
 statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report
 (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
 financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 (4) The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
 defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
 ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
 those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
 the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
 issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
 reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and
 (5) The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial
 reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the
 equivalent functions):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
 to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal
 control over financial reporting.
 
 Date: August 23, 2004
 
 /s/                  Parrish Medley
 By:  Parrish Medley
 Title: Chief Executive Officer
  1
SCPW-17-0000891

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

K. L., Petitioner,

vs.

THE HONORABLE DARIEN W.L. NAGATA, Judge of the Family Court of

the Third Circuit, State of Hawai#i, Respondent Judge,

and

A.L.B., Born ________, 2007, Respondent.

 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(FC-S No. 15-0007; FC-A No. 17-0019; FC-A No. 17-0029)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Upon consideration of petitioner K. L.’s petition for

writ of mandamus, filed on December 15, 2017, the documents

attached thereto and submitted in support thereof, and the

record, it appears that, the family court has taken steps to

ensure that all interested persons have the opportunity to be

heard and meaningfully participate in the proceedings. At this

juncture, petitioner is not entitled to an extraordinary writ. 

See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204-05, 982 P.2d 334, 338-39

(1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-17-0000891

09-JAN-2018

08:21 AM
not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and

indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to

redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested

action; where a court has discretion to act, mandamus will not

lie to interfere with or control the exercise of that discretion,

even when the judge has acted erroneously, unless the judge has

exceeded his or her jurisdiction, has committed a flagrant and

manifest abuse of discretion, or has refused to act on a subject

properly before the court under circumstances in which he or she

has a legal duty to act). Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of

mandamus is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, January 9, 2018.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 27 (Thursday, February 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7761]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3192]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP91-174-000]


Great Lakes Gas Transmission Limited Partnership; Notice of Semi-
Annual Transporter's Use Report

February 3, 1995.
    Take notice that on January 31, 1995, Great Lakes Gas Transmission 
Limited Partnership (Great Lakes), filed with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission (Commission) its Semi-Annual Transporter's Use 
Report.
    Great Lakes states that the purpose of its filing is to comply with 
Section 4.3 of Rate Schedules FT and IT of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second 
Revised Volume No. 1. Great Lakes further states that the above-
described tariff provisions require Great Lakes to file, each January 
31 and July 31, workpapers setting forth the calculations of the 
monthly Transporter's Use percentages applicable during each month of 
the immediately preceding six-month period.
    Great Lakes states that a copy of its filing was posted and that 
copies thereof were served on each of its customers, the Public Service 
Commissions of the States of Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan, and on 
all remaining parties listed on the service list maintained by the 
Commission's Secretary in this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street 
NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rule 211 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). All such 
protests should be filed on or before February 10, 1995. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action 
to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Commission's Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-3192 Filed 2-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3763 

To repeal the waiver and termination provisions of the Protecting Europe’s 

Energy Security Act of 2019. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 3, 2022 

Mr. CRUZ (for himself, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. COTTON, and Mr. 

HAGERTY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To repeal the waiver and termination provisions of the 

Protecting Europe’s Energy Security Act of 2019. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF WAIVER AND TERMINATION PROVI4 SIONS OF PROTECTING EUROPE’S ENERGY 

5 SECURITY ACT OF 2019. 

6 Section 7503 of the Protecting Europe’s Energy Se7 curity Act of 2019 (title LXXV of Public Law 116–92; 

8 22 U.S.C. 9526 note) is amended by striking subsections 

9 (f) and (h). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS