12734 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 8, 1995 / Notices

Environmental Policy Act, and the

Administrative Procedures Act. The

lead plaintiffs were the Sierra Club and

the Wilderness Society, representing

nine co-plaintiffs. A Settlement

Agreement was signed on September 13,

1993 and the U.S. District Court has

issued an order directing

implementation of the Settlement

Agreement.

The key component of the Settlement

Agreement was a commitment by the

Forest Service to begin the process of

revising the Clearwater Forest Plan

within 18 months of the settlement

agreement being signed to provide longterm resolution between the parties. The

settlement agreement was signed on

September 13, 1993.

The Settlement Agreement also states

that the current Forest Plan will remain

in effect during the revision process but

implementation would be modified

using four interim measures. These

interim measures provide additional

direction related to the implementation

of projects and activities in certain

roadless areas, timber harvest, old

growth and water quality.

Following the settlement agreement,

the Clearwater National Forest began

gathering background information

necessary to begin the revision process.

However, since September 1993, several

other related Forest Service planning

efforts have been initiated that involve

the Clearwater National Forest. Most

notable is the ‘‘Upper Columbia River

Basin, Environmental Impact

Statement’’ (UCRB), which will address

issues relevant to the Clearwater

National Forest and likely result in

changes to Forest Plans in the UCRB.

Notice of this effort and supporting

information was previously published

in the Federal Register on December 4,

1994.

The purpose of the Upper Columbia

River Basin, EIS is to ‘‘* * * develop

and analyze a scientifically sound,

ecosystem-based strategy for

management of lands administered by

the United States Department of

Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service.

* * * The strategy will modify existing

Forest Plans and will focus on forest,

rangeland, and aquatic/riparian

ecosystem health and the sustainability

of threatened, endangered, and sensitive

species.’’ Clearly this effort will have a

profound influence on the revision

process for the Clearwater National

Forest. Therefore, the revision schedule

for the Clearwater National Forest is

designed to coordinate with the

information and decisions produced by

the UCRB, EIS. As part of the revision

schedule separate notices will go out for

scoping, comments on the DEIS, and

comments on the FEIS.

During the next 12–18 months, while

the UCRB, EIS is in preparation, the

Clearwater National Forest will

continue to gather data and information,

and conduct assessments of resource

conditions to better frame the revision

process. Tribal governments, state or

federal agencies or the public are

invited to send comments regarding

their ideas concerning information or

data that the Clearwater National Forest

can be gathering and assessing during

this 12–18 month period.

DATES: Comments concerning resource

assessments or data gathering in support

of the Clearwater Forest Plan revision,

should be received in writing by 90 days

following the publication of this notice

in the Federal Register. A supplemental

notice will be placed in the Federal

Register announcing the beginning of

formal scoping for the DEIS with an

opportunity to comment following

completion of the UCRB, EIS.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments

concerning this proposal to James L.

Caswell, Forest Supervisor, Clearwater

National Forest, 12730 US Highway 12,

Orofino, Idaho 83544.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Doug Gochnour, Forest Planning Staff

Officer or Harry Jageman, Acting

Revision Team Leader, 12730 US

Highway 12, Orofino, Idaho 83544,

phone (208) 476–4541.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Preliminary tasks that have been

identified for assessment and data

gathering include: Land type

descriptions, social/economic, old

growth, watersheds, recreation, forest

health and fire history. In general, these

assessments will be conducted at a

smaller, more localized scale than will

occur for the entire UCRB.

Revision scoping meetings are

tentatively planned for Moscow,

Lewiston, Orofino, and Kooskia, in

Idaho and Missoula Montana. Specific

dates, times and locations will be

announced in local newspapers of

general distribution. These scoping

meetings will begin following the

completion of the UCRB, EIS presently

scheduled for summer, 1996. The

projected dates for the DEIS and FEIS

will be posted in the Federal Register at

a later date.

The alternatives considered in the

revision of the Clearwater Forest Plan

will be consistent with decisions made

in the UCRB, EIS. The purpose and

need, preliminary issues, and the scope

of the Clearwater Forest Plan revision,

will be further described in a separate

Federal Register notice at a later date.

The responsible official for the

revision of the Clearwater Forest Plan

will be the Regional Forester, Northern

Region, P.O. Box 7669, Missoula,

Montana.

David F. Jolly,

Regional Forester.

[FR Doc. 95–5567 Filed 3–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410–11–M

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

[Order No. 730]

Foreign-Trade Zones Board; Approval

of Export Processing Activity; Upstate

Precision Mfg., Inc. (Office Furniture

Systems) Within Foreign-Trade Zone

54, Clinton County, NY

Pursuant to its authority under the ForeignTrade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as

amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the ForeignTrade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the

following Order:

Whereas, § 400.28(a)(2) of the Board’s

regulations, requires approval of the

Board prior to commencement of new

manufacturing/processing activity

within existing zone facilities;

Whereas, the Clinton County Area

Development Corporation, grantee of

FTZ 54, Clinton County, New York, has

requested authority under § 400.32(b)(1)

of the Board’s regulations on behalf of

Upstate Precision Mfg., Inc. (UPMI), to

manufacture modular furniture panels

for export within FTZ 54 (filed 11–23–

94, FTZ Docket A(32b1)–4–94; Doc. 7–

95, assigned 2/21/95);

Whereas, pursuant to § 400.32(b)(1),

the Commerce Department’s Assistant

Secretary for Import Administration has

the authority to act for the Board in

making such decisions on new

manufacturing/processing activity

under certain circumstances, including

situations where the proposed activity is

for export only (§ 400.32(b)(1)(ii); and,

Whereas, the FTZ Staff has reviewed

the proposal, taking into account the

criteria of § 400.31, and the Executive

Secretary has recommended approval;

Now, Therefore, the Assistant

Secretary for Import Administration,

acting for the Board pursuant to

§ 400.32(b)(1), concurs in the

recommendation and hereby approves

the request subject to the Act and the

Board’s regulations, including § 400.28,

and subject to the further condition that

all textile products admitted to the zone

for UPMI shall be of U.S. origin or shall

be a good originating in the territory of

a NAFTA country (Sec. 202, PL 103–

182, 12–8–93).
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 8, 1995 / Notices 12735

Signed at Washington, DC, this 28th day of

February 1995.

Susan G. Esserman,

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import

Administration, Chairman, Committee of

Alternates Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

[FR Doc. 95–5562 Filed 3–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

[Order No. 734]

Foreign-Trade Zones Board;

Expansion of Foreign-Trade Zone 21

Charleston, SC, Area

Pursuant to its authority under the ForeignTrade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as

amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the ForeignTrade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the

following Order:

Whereas, an application from the

South Carolina State Ports Authority,

grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone No. 21,

requesting authority to expand its

general-purpose zone at sites in the

Charleston and Georgetown Customs

port of entry areas, and requesting

authority to use zone procedures for the

installation of foreign audio components

into automobiles within FTZ 21, was

filed by the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ)

Board on September 14, 1993 (Docket

50–93, 58 FR 50330, 9/27/93) (amended,

8/9/94, 49 FR 40519; and, 11/10/94, 59

FR 56034);

Whereas, notice inviting public

comment was given in the Federal

Register and the application has been

processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and

the Board’s regulations; and,

Whereas, the Board has found that the

requirements of the Act and the

regulations are satisfied, and that the

proposal is in the public interest;

Now, Therefore, the Board hereby

orders:

The grantee is authorized to expand

its zone and conduct processing activity

under zone procedures as requested in

the application, as amended, subject to

the Act and the Board’s regulations,

including § 400.28.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 28th day of

February 1995.

Susan G. Esserman,

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import

Administration, Alternate Chairman, ForeignTrade Zones Board.

[FR Doc. 95–5563 Filed 3–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

[Order No. 727]

Foreign-Trade Zones Board; Grant of

Authority for Subzone Status;

Smithkline Beecham Corporation

(Pharmaceuticals) Bristol, TN

Pursuant to its authority under the ForeignTrade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as

amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the ForeignTrade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the

following Order:

Whereas, by an Act of Congress

approved June 18, 1934, an Act ‘‘To

provide for the establishment . . . of

foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of

the United States, to expedite and

encourage foreign commerce, and for

other purposes,’’ as amended (19 U.S.C.

81a-81u) (the Act), the Foreign-Trade

Zones Board (the Board) is authorized to

grant to qualified corporations the

privilege of establishing foreign-trade

zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs

ports of entry;

Whereas, the Board’s regulations (15

CFR Part 400) provide for the

establishment of special-purpose

subzones when existing zone facilities

cannot serve the specific use involved;

Whereas, an application from the

Industrial Board of Blount County,

Tennessee, grantee of Foreign-Trade

Zone 148, for authority to establish

special-purpose subzone status at the

pharmaceutical manufacturing plant of

SmithKline Beecham Corporation, in

Bristol, Tennessee, was filed by the

Board on November 8, 1993, and notice

inviting public comment was given in

the Federal Register (FTZ Docket 55–93,

58 FR 61065, 11–19–93); and,

Whereas, the Board has found that the

requirements of the FTZ Act and

Board’s regulations are satisfied, and

that approval of the application is in the

public interest;

Now, Therefore, the Board hereby

authorizes the establishment of a

subzone (Subzone 148A) at the plant

site of SmithKline Beecham

Corporation, in Bristol, Tennessee, at

the location described in the

application, subject to the FTZ Act and

the Board’s regulations, including

§ 400.28.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 28th day of

February 1995.

Susan G. Esserman,

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import

Administration Alternate Chairman ForeignTrade Zones Board.

Attest:

John J. Da Ponte, Jr.,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–5561 Filed 3–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

International Trade Administration,

Commerce

Export Trade Certificate of Review

ACTION: Notice of Issuance of an Export

Trade Certificate of Review, Application

No. 94–00007.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce

has issued an Export Trade Certificate of

Review to Florida Citrus Exports, L.C.

This notice summarizes the conduct for

which certification has been granted.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

W. Dawn Busby, Director, Office of

Export Trading Company Affairs,

International Trade Administration,

202–482–5131. This is not a toll-free

number.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title III of

the Export Trading Company Act of

1982 (15 U.S.C. 4001–21) authorizes the

Secretary of Commerce to issue Export

Trade Certificates of Review. The

regulations implementing Title III are

found at 15 CFR Part 325 (1993).

The Office of Export Trading

Company Affairs is issuing this notice

pursuant to 15 CFR 325.6(b), which

requires the Secretary of Commerce to

publish a summary of a Certificate in

the Federal Register. Under Section

305(a) of the Act and 15 CFR 325.11(a),

any person aggrieved by the Secretary’s

determination may, within 30 days of

the date of this notice, bring an action

in any appropriate district court of the

United States to set aside the

determination on the ground that the

determination is erroneous.

Description of Certified Conduct

Export Trade

1. Products

Fresh citrus.

2. Services

Inspection, quality control, marketing

and promotional services.

3. Technology Rights

Proprietary rights to all technology

associated with Products or

Services, including, but not limited

to: patents, trademarks, service

marks, trade names, copyrights,

trade secrets, and know-how.

4. Export Trade Facilitation Services (as

they relate to the Export of

Products, Services and Technology

Rights)

All export trade-related facilitation

services, including, but not limited

to: consulting and trade strategy;

sales and marketing; export

brokerage; foreign marketing

research; foreign market

development; overseas advertising

and promotion; product research

and design based on foreign buyer