alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3853 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3853

  To reauthorize the Maurice D. Hinchey Hudson River Valley National 
                 Heritage Area, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 16, 2022

Mrs. Gillibrand (for herself and Mr. Schumer) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To reauthorize the Maurice D. Hinchey Hudson River Valley National 
                 Heritage Area, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Maurice D. Hinchey Hudson River 
Valley National Heritage Area Reauthorization Act''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE MAURICE D. HINCHEY HUDSON RIVER VALLEY 
              NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA.

    (a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 909(c) of division II 
of Public Law 104-333 (54 U.S.C. 320101 note; 110 Stat. 4280; 122 Stat. 
824; 133 Stat. 779) is amended, in the matter preceding paragraph (1), 
by striking ``$15,000,000'' and inserting ``$17,000,000''.
    (b) Reauthorization.--Section 910 of division II of Public Law 104-
333 (54 U.S.C. 320101 note; 110 Stat. 4281; 127 Stat. 420; 128 Stat. 
314; 128 Stat. 3801; 133 Stat. 779), as amended by section 119(e)(6) of 
division G of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022, is amended by 
striking ``2023'' and inserting ``2037''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.17

 

LEASE AMENDMENT NO. 1

 

WHEREAS, Station Casinos, Inc. (“Lessee”) and Texas Gambling Hall & Hotel, Inc. (“Landlord”) have entered in a Ground Lease and Sublease dated June 1, 1995 (the “Lease”);

 

AND WHEREAS, Lessee subsequently assigned its interest in the Lease to Texas Station, Inc. (“Tenant”) in an Assignment, Assumption and Consent Agreement dated July 6, 1995;

 

WHEREAS, Landlord and Lessee agreed and intended as of such date that the appraised value of the lease be the higher of the fair market value of the land or the present value of lease payments;

 

WHEREAS, Landlord and Leasee received advice from Carlsmith, Ball, Wichman, Case & Ichiki that the lease language is not inconsistent with that intent; and

 

WHEREAS, in connection with Landlord’s accommodating requests for asset transfers needed by Lessee and Tenant for its gaming license needs, Landlord expressed a desire to memorialize the intent by amending the Lease;

 

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties to the Lease agree to amend the Lease by adding a sentence at the end of paragraph I.2. in Article I thereof as follows:

 

“Notwithstanding the foregoing, the market value of the Landlord’s interest shall not be deemed to be lower than the present value of the income stream remaining on the Lease.”

 

By executing below, the parties agree to this Amendment No. 1 to the Lease this 23rd day of December, 1996.

 

	
 
    	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Glenn C. Christenson
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Texas   Station, Inc.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   W. J. Bullard
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Texas   Gambling Hall & Hotel, Inc.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-11455

Legrand North & Central America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
1 The Honorable Laurie Smith Camp, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 05-2700

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Darius M. Moss, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: March 21, 2006 Filed: April 6, 2006

___________ Before RILEY, MAGILL, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Darius Moss appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his Fede ral Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion challenging a 1999 order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion; he also appeals the denial of his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) motion. Moss’s motion was in reality a successive section 2255 motion. Cf. Gonzalez v. Crosby , 125 S. Ct. 2641, 2647-48 (2005) (Rule 60(b) motion should not be treated as successive habeas motion if it attacks district court’s previous resolution of claim on procedural grounds); United States v. Patton , 309 F.3d 1093, 1094 (8th-2- Cir. 2002) (per curiam) (inmates may not bypass authorization requirement of § 2255 by purporting to invoke some other proce dure). Thus, we deny a certificate of appealability (COA), seeUnited States v. Lambros , 404 F.3d 1034, 1036 (8th Cir.) (per curiam) (COA is required to appeal de nial of any motion that ultimately seeks habeas relief), cert. denied , 125 S. Ct. 2953 (2005), and dismiss this appeal.

______________________________
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 236 (Friday, December 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 63025]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-29959]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED


Procurement List; Additions

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Additions to the Procurement List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action adds to the Procurement List services to be 
furnished by nonprofit agencies employing persons who are blind or have 
other severe disabilities.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 8, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, Crystal Square 3, Suite 403, 1735 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Arlington, Virginia 22202-3461.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Milkman (703) 603-7740.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 16 and October 6, 1995, the 
Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled 
published notices (60 F.R. 31706 and 52388) of proposed additions to 
the Procurement List.
    After consideration of the material presented to it concerning 
capability of qualified nonprofit agencies to provide the services, 
fair market price, and impact of the addition on the current or most 
recent contractors, the Committee has determined that the services 
listed below are suitable for procurement by the Federal Government 
under 41 U.S.C. 46-48c and 41 CFR 51-2.4.
    I certify that the following action will not have a significant 
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The major factors 
considered for this certification were:
    1. The action will not result in any additional reporting, 
recordkeeping or other compliance requirements for small entities other 
than the small organizations that will furnish the services to the 
Government.
    2. The action will not have a severe economic impact on current 
contractors for the services.
    3. The action will result in authorizing small entities to furnish 
the services to the Government.
    4. There are no known regulatory alternatives which would 
accomplish the objectives of the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46-
48c) in connection with the service proposed for addition to the 
Procurement List.
    Accordingly, the following services are hereby added to the 
Procurement List:

Grounds Maintenance, Nogales Border Station (West), Nogales, Arizona
Mailroom Operation, Internal Revenue Service, 300 North Los Angeles 
Street, Los Angeles, California.

    This action does not affect current contracts awarded prior to the 
effective date of this addition or options exercised under those 
contracts.
Beverly L. Milkman,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 95-29959 Filed 12-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-33-P
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 42 (Friday, March 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 11975]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5239]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Advisory Committee for Injury Prevention and Control (ACIPC); 
Family and Intimate Violence Prevention Subcommittee; Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC), announces the following subcommittee meeting.

    Name: ACIPC Family and Intimate Violence Prevention 
Subcommittee.
    Time and Date: 1 p.m.-5 p.m., March 20, 1995.
    Place: Holiday Inn at Lenox/Buckhead, 3377 Peachtree Road, NE, 
Atlanta, Georgia 30326.
    Status: Open to the public, limited only by the space available.
    Purpose: The subcommittee provides advice and makes 
recommendations to the ACIPC regarding feasible goals for prevention 
and control of family and intimate violence. The subcommittee makes 
recommendations regarding policies, strategies, objectives and 
priorities; and advises on the development of a national plan for 
family and intimate violence and the development of new technologies 
and their subsequent application.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The subcommittee will discuss 
communications and definitional issues for the Family and Intimate 
Violence Prevention Program.
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.
    Contact Person for More Information: Ms. Denise Johnson, Acting 
Team Leader, Family and Intimate Violence Prevention Team, Division 
of Violence Prevention, Mailstop K-60, National Center for Injury 
Prevention and Control, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway, NE, Atlanta, 
Georgia 30341-3724, telephone 404/488-4410.

    Dated: February 27, 1995.
William H. Gimson,
Acting Associate Director for Policy Coordination, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. 95-5239 Filed 3-2-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-M
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 131477 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 131477 

 COA: 269057 

Genesee CC: 04-015069-FC 

GIMEL QADDIAR MORGAN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 25, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d1023 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2006 

 Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3884 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3884

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 404 U.S. Highway 41 North in Baraga, Michigan, as the ``Cora 
                    Reynolds Anderson Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CORA REYNOLDS ANDERSON POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 404 U.S. Highway 41 North in Baraga, Michigan, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Cora Reynolds Anderson Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Cora 
Reynolds Anderson Post Office''.

            Passed the Senate September 20, 2022.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
117th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3884

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 404 U.S. Highway 41 North in Baraga, Michigan, as the ``Cora 
                    Reynolds Anderson Post Office''.
```
EXHIBIT 32.1



                                  EXHIBIT 32.1



                              Certification of CEO
                         pursuant to Section 906 of the
              Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 regarding Quarterly Report
              on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended October 31, 2005

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby
certify that:

         1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal period
ended October 31, 2005, (the Form 10Q-SB) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and

         2. Information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:    May 4, 2007                             By: /s/ Joseph Kristul
         -----------                                ------------------

                                                     Joseph Kristul
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
WIRE 

INSULATION

WIRE 

AWG

CLIP TO 

FIT TUBE 

SIZE (mm)

"L" ±12.7 

(mm) WIRE COLOR CONNECTOR COLOR

PVC 24 OR 26 N/A 990.6 YELLOW NATURALPVC 24 OR 26 N/A 939.8 GREEN NATURAL

2 PLACE ±0.05mm1 PLACE ±0.1mm0 PLACE ±0.5mmSTANDARD STD-GEN-026TOLERANCES ARE REGULATED BY UNILATERAL AND OFFSET BILATERAL TOLERANCES:  : INDICATES A CRITICAL CHARACANGLES ±5°

NAME DATE

DRAWNCHECKEDAPPROVED

D

POTTED WITH BLACK EPOXY

HOUS

CASE MADE FROMPOLYMERIC MATERIAL 

 " L " SEE TABLE A 

 

5.334

4.826

 

 25.40 ±2.54
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

APPOINTMENT TO THE DISCIPLINARY 

BOARD OF PENNSYLVANIA

:

:

:

:

No. 302

DISCIPLINARY BOARD APPOINTMENT 

DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 25th day of September, 2018, Christopher M. Miller, Esquire, 

Allegheny County, is hereby appointed as a member of the Disciplinary Board of 

Pennsylvania for a term expiring September 1, 2021.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Frank, Alston and Senior Judge Coleman 

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND 

 LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

 

v. Record No. 0308-09-4 PER CURIAM 

JUNE 23, 2009 

GEORGE CONSTANTINE GIATAS 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (Patricia C. Arrighi; Wendy E. Warren; PennStuart, on brief), for 

appellants. 

 (M. Thomas McWeeny; Koonz, McKenney, Johnson, DePaolis & 

Lightfoot, L.L.P., on brief), for appellee. 

 United Parcel Service, Inc. and Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company (hereinafter 

referred to as employer) appeal a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding 

that George C. Giatas (claimant) proved additional temporary total disability from February 26, 

2007 through May 11, 2008. Employer assigns error to the finding that the medical reports of 

Dr. Michael C. Trahos causally related claimant’s current disability to his compensable injury. 

We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without 

merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See

Giatas v. United Parcel Service, Inc., VWC File No. 215-73-45 (Jan. 14, 2009). We dispense 

with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are 

 *

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. 
- 2 - 

adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. 

 Affirmed.
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 18 , 2018.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 18 -01011- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.Z.S., JR., J.A.S., J.S., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 311th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2016-83144

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an attempted appeal from a final decree terminating the parent

- child relationship between appellant K.L.E. and her children. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 161.001(b). The final decree was signed October 10, 2018 . Appellant filed a notice of appeal November 16, 2018. An appeal in a parental termination suit is accelerated. Tex. R. App. P. 28.4(a)(2)(A). A notice of appeal in an accelerated case must be filed within twenty days after the judgment is signed. Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(b). The deadline may be extended by fifteen days if, within that fifteen

- day period, appellant files the notice2

of appeal in the trial court and a motion for extension of time in the court of appeals. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3; Verburgt v. Dorner , 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Unlike in a non-accelerated appeal, a timely-filed post

- judgment motion does not extend the deadline to file the notice of appeal in an acc elerated appeal. In re K.A.F. , 160 S.W.3d 923, 926

– 27 (Tex. 2005 )

. Appellant’s notice of appeal was due October 30, 2018 but was not filed until November 16, 2018

. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(b). A court of appeals lacks jurisdiction to hear an appeal that wa s not timely perfected. When the court lacks jurisdiction, it must dismiss the appeal. See Baker v. Baker , 469 S.W.3d 269, 272 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 2015, no pet.).
On November 27 , 2018, we notified the parties that we would dismiss this appeal f or lack of jurisdiction if no party demonstrated, by December 10 , 2018, meritorious grounds for retaining the appeal. Appellant filed a response in which her attorney argues that the failure to timely file a notice of appeal was not purposeful or intended to delay appellate counsel. Counsel’s affidavit notes that appellate counsel has been notified of the need to request an out

- of

- time a ppeal. This court, however, does not have jurisdiction to consider any appeal unless our jurisdiction has been timely invoked. See In re K.A.F. , 160 S.W.3d at 928; In re R.B.M. , 338 S.W.3d 755, 757

– 58 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 2011, no pet.) ( noting that the high court may have authority to grant an out

- of

- time appeal)

. Appellant’s response does not demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction over this appeal

. We dismiss the appeal.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher, and Jewell.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Physiology and Pathology of Tree Fruits Research: Wenatchee, WA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Wenatchee, Washington Physiology and Pathology of Tree Fruits Research Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Research Projects Subjects of Investigation at this LocationEach ARS research project has related subjects of investigation.  Listed below are the subjects of investigation currently conducted at this location.
Clicking on a subject of investigation will list the research projects within that  subject of investigation.Subjects of Investigation
                            Apple
                                Cherry
                                Deciduous and small fruits, general/other
                                Pear


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov