2612 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 10, 1995 / Notices

accompanying documentation indicates

that no known individuals were

identifiable. Both the Grindel and Sandy

Point Sites are located within the

aboriginal territory of the Penobscot

Indian Nation.

Based on the available archaeological

and ethnohistorical evidence, as well as

the geographical and oral tradition

evidence provided by the Tribes of the

Wabanaki Confederacy during

consultation, officials of the Robert S.

Peabody Museum of Archaeology have

determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C.

3001 (2), there is a relationship of

shared group identity which can be

reasonably traced between these human

remains and associated funerary objects

from the Grindel and Sandy Point Sites

and the Penobscot Indian Nation.

The fragmentary human remains of

two individuals—a ten to twelve year

old female and a sub-adult to adult

male—were recovered in 1914 from a

site opposite the village at the Head of

the Grand Lake Stream. The human

remains were recovered with some

wood fragments that are believed to

have been remnants of a decayed coffin,

a seal top spoon, a moose tooth,

charcoal, pebbles and organic materials.

This site is believed to have been

occupied between 1600 and 1650.

Inventory of the human remains and

associated funerary objects from this site

and review of the accompanying

documentation indicates that no known

individuals were identifiable. This site

is located within the aboriginal territory

of the Passamaquoddy Tribe.

Based on the available archaeological

and ethnohistorical evidence, as well as

the geographical and oral tradition

evidence provided by the Tribes of the

Wabanaki Confederacy during

consultation, officials of the Robert S.

Peabody Museum of Archaeology have

determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C.

3001 (2), there is a relationship of

shared group identity which can be

reasonably traced between these human

remains and associated funerary objects

from the site opposite the village at the

Head of the Grand Lake Stream in Grand

Lake, ME, and the Passamaquoddy

Tribe.

The fragmentary human remains of

two individuals—a twenty five year old

male and a fifty-five to sixty year old

male—were recovered in 1933 from the

Harbor Island Shellheap in Brooklin,

ME. The Harbor Island Shellheap is

believed to have been occupied between

900 and 1500. The human remains of

two individuals—the fragmentary

human remains of a two to three year

old child whose sex could not be

determined and the partial human

remains of a thirty-five to forty year old

female—were recovered in 1935 from

the High Point Site in Brooklin, ME. The

High Point Site is believed to have been

occupied between 900 and 1500. The

fragmentary human remains of a sixteen

to seventeen year old male, were

recovered in 1913 from the Hodgkins’

Point Shellheap in Lamoine, ME.

Hodgkins’ Point Shellheap is believed to

have been occupied between 900 and

1500. The partial human remains of a

thirty-five to forty year old male were

recovered in 1915 from the Holbrook

Island site in Castine, ME. The Holbrook

Island Site is believed to have been

occupied between 900 and 1500. The

fragmentary human remains of a fifty to

sixty year old male were recovered in

1915 from Hooper’s Shellheap in

Penobscot, ME. A moose incisor and

several lithic flakes may have been

associated funerary objects. Hooper’s

Shellheap is believed to have been

occupied between 900 and 1500. The

human remains of two individuals—a

twenty-five to thirty year old adult male

and the fragmentary human remains of

an adult who was probably female—

were recovered in 1915 from Richard’s

Shellheap. A bone tool, a potsherd, a

beaver tooth, and a lithic projectile

point fragment may have been

associated funerary objects. Richard’s

Shellheap is believed to have been

occupied between 900 and 1500. The

human remains of a forty-five to fiftyfive year old male were recovered in

1915 from Wheeler’s Shellheap in Blue

Hill, ME. Wheeler’s Shellheap is

believed to have been occupied between

900 and 1500. The fragmentary human

remains of a fourteen to fifteen year old

female, were recovered in 1912 from an

unidentified site in Passadumkeag, ME.

A lithic flake, two pebbles, and a lithic

projectile point may have been

associated funerary objects. The

individual from this site is believed to

have been interred between 900 and

1500. The Harbor Island Shellheap,

High Point Site, Hodgkins’ Point

Shellheap, Holbrook Island site,

Hooper’s Shellheap, Richard’s

Shellheap, Wheeler’s Shellheap, and the

unidentified site in Passadumkeag, ME,

are located within the aboriginal

territory of the people known

historically as the Etchemin. Inventory

of the human remains and associated

funerary objects from sites occupied

between 900 and 1500 that are located

within the aboriginal territory of the

people known historically as the

Etchemin and review of the

accompanying documentation indicates

that no known individuals were

identifiable. The Etchemin are

considered ancestral to the Penobscot

Indian Nation and the Passamaquoddy

Tribe.

Based on the available archaeological

and ethnohistorical evidence, as well as

the geographical and oral tradition

evidence provided by the Tribes of the

Wabanaki Confederacy during

consultation, officials of the Robert S.

Peabody Museum of Archaeology have

determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C.

3001 (2), there is a relationship of

shared group identity which can be

reasonably traced between these human

remains and possibly associated

funerary objects from Harbor Island

Shellheap, High Point Site, Hodgkins’

Point Shellheap, Holbrook Island site,

Hooper’s Shellheap, Richard’s

Shellheap, Wheeler’s Shellheap, and the

unidentified site in Passadumkeag, ME,

and the Penobscot Indian Nation and

the Passamaquoddy Tribe.

This notice has been sent to officials

of the Penobscot Indian Nation, the

Passamaquoddy Tribe, the Aroostook

Band of Micmac Indians, and the

Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians.

Representatives of any other Indian tribe

which believes itself to be culturally

affiliated with these human remains and

associated funerary objects should

contact James W. Bradley, Director of

the Robert S. Peabody Museum of

Archaeology, Phillips Academy,

Andover, MA 01810; telephone: (508)

749–4490, before February 9, 1995.

Repatriation of these human remains

and associated funerary objects to the

Tribes of the Wabanaki Confederacy

may begin after that date if no

additional claimants come forward.

Dated: January 5, 1995.

Francis P. McManamon,

Departmental Consulting Archeologist,

Chief, Archeological Assistance Division.

[FR Doc. 95–561 Filed 1–9–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–70–F

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Information Collections Under Review

The Office of Management and Budget

(OMB) has been sent the following

collection(s) of information proposals

for review under the provisions of the

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 USC

Chapter 35) and the Paperwork

Reduction Reauthorization Act since the

last list was published. Entries are

grouped into submission categories,

with each entry containing the

following information:

(1) The title of the form/collection;

(2) The agency form number, if any,

and the applicable component of the

Department sponsoring the collection;
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 10, 1995 / Notices 2613

(3) How often the form must be filled

out or the information is collected;

(4) Who will be asked or required to

respond, as well as a brief abstract;

(5) An estimate of the total number of

respondents and the amount of time

estimated for an average respondent to

respond;

(6) An estimate of the total public

burden (in hours) associated with the

collection; and,

(7) An indication as to whether

Section 3504(h) of Public Law 96–511

applies.

Comments and/or suggestions

regarding the item(s) contained in this

notice, especially regarding the

estimated public burden and associated

response time, should be directed to the

OMB reviewer, Mr. Jeff Hill on (202)

395–7340 and to the Department of

Justice’s Clearance Officer, Mr. Robert B.

Briggs, on (202) 514–4319. If you

anticipate commenting on a form/

collection, but find that time to prepare

such comments will prevent you from

prompt submission, you should notify

the OMB reviewer and the Department

of Justice Clearance Officer of your

intent as soon as possible. Written

comments regarding the burden

estimate or any other aspect of the

collection may be submitted to Office of

Information and Regulatory Affairs,

Office of Management and Budget,

Washington, DC 20503, and to Mr.

Robert B. Briggs, Department of Justice

Clearance Officer, Systems Policy Staff/

Information Resources Management/

Justice Management Division Suite 850,

WCTR, Washington, DC 20530.

Extension of the expiration date of a

currently approved collection without

any change in the substance or in the

method of collection.

(1) Annual Survey of Jails.

(2) CJ–5. Bureau of Justice Statistics.

(3) Annually.

(4) State and local governments. This

is an annual sample survey that

provides national estimates on inmates

in local adult correctional facilities,

which is used by Federal, State, and

local correctional administrators,

legislators, researchers, and planners.

(5) 825 annual respondents at .75

hours per response.

(6) 619 annual burden hours.

(7) Not applicable under Section

3504(h) of Public Law 96–511.

Public comment on this item is

encouraged.

Dated: January 4, 1995.

Kathy Albert,

Acting Department Clearance Officer, United

States Department of Justice.

[FR Doc. 95–529 Filed 1–9–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–18–M

Information Collections Under Review

The Office of Management and Budget

(OMB) has been sent the following

collection(s) of information proposals

for review under the provisions of the

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 USC

Chapter 35) and the Paperwork

Reduction Reauthorization Act since the

last list was published. Entries are

grouped into submission categories,

with each entry containing the

following information:

(1) The title of the form/collection;

(2) The agency form number, if any,

and the applicable component of the

Department sponsoring the collection;

(3) How often the form must be filled

out or the information is collected;

(4) Who will be asked or required to

respond, as well as a brief abstract;

(5) An estimate of the total number of

respondents and the amount of time

estimated for an average respondent to

respond;

(6) An estimate of the total public

burden (in hours) associated with the

collection; and,

(7) An indication as to whether

Section 3504(h) of Public Law 96–511

applies.

Comments and/or suggestions

regarding the item(s) contained in this

notice, especially regarding the

estimated public burden and associated

response time, should be directed to the

OMB reviewer, Mr. Jeff Hill on (202)

395–7340 AND to the Department of

Justice’s Clearance Officer, Mr. Robert B.

Briggs, on (202 ) 514–4319. If you

anticipate commenting on a form/

collection, but find that time to prepare

such comments will prevent you from

prompt submission, you should notify

the OMB reviewer and the Department

of Justice Clearance Officer of your

intent as soon as possible. Written

comments regarding the burden

estimate or any other aspect of the

collection may be submitted to Office of

Information and Regulatory Affairs,

Office of Management and Budget,

Washington, DC 20503, and to Mr.

Robert B. Briggs, Department of Justice

Clearance Officer, Systems Policy Staff/

Information Resources Management/

Justice Management Division Suite 850,

WCTR, Washington, DC 20530.

Reinstatement of a previously

approved collection for which approval

has expired.

(1) Survey of Inmates of Local Jails

Pretest.

(2) a. CAPI Instrument, Form SIJ–43

(X).

b. Sampling Questionnaire, Form SIJ–

50 (X). Bureau of Justice Statistics.

(3) Approximately every 5 years.

(4) Individuals or households and

State and local governments. This is a

pretest for a survey that will profile jail

inmates nationwide to determine trends

in inmate composition, criminal

histories and drug abuse, gun use and

crime, and to report on victims of crime.

The data will be used by BJS, Congress,

researchers, practitioners and others in

the criminal justice community. No

other collection series provides this

data.

(5) 153 annual respondents at 1 hour

per response.

(6) 153 annual burden hours.

(7) Not applicable under Section

3504(h) of Public Law 96–511.

Public comment on this item is

encouraged.

Dated: January 4, 1995.

Kathy Albert,

Department Clearance Officer, United States

Department of Justice.

[FR Doc. 95–530 Filed 1–9–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–18–M

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decrees

In United States v. Nalco Chemical

Company, et al., Under the

Comprehensive Environmental

Response, Compensation, and Liability

Act

Notice is hereby given that two

proposed Consent Decrees in United

States v. Nalco Chemical Company, et

al., Case No. 91–C–4482 (N.D. Ill.),

entered into by the United States on

behalf of U.S. EPA and fifteen settling

parties were lodged on December 22,

1994 with the United States District

Court for the Northern District of

Illinois. The proposed Consent Decrees

resolve certain claims of the United

States against the settling parties under

the Comprehensive Environmental

Response Compensation and Liability

Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601 et seq. relating to

the Byron Superfund Site in Ogle

County, Illinois, Under the First de

minimis Consent Decree, nine settling

parties among the ‘‘drum’’ parties in the

case will pay the United States

$94,405.86. Under the second de

minimis Consent Decree, six settling

parties among the ‘‘IPC customer’’

parties in the case will pay the United

States $429,045.17.

The Department of Justice will receive

comments relating to the proposed

Consent Decrees for 30 days following

the publication of this Notice.

Comments should be addressed to the

Assistant Attorney General of the

Environment and Natural Resources

Division, Department of Justice,

Washington, D.C. 20530, and should

refer to United States v. Nalco Chemical

Company, et al., D.J. Ref. No. 90–11–3–

687. The proposed Consent Decrees may