11110 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 40 / Wednesday, March 1, 1995 / Notices

1The imports subject to investigation are

seamless carbon and alloy (other than stainless)

steel pipes, of circular cross-section, not more than

114.3mm (4.5 inches) in outside diameter,

regardless of wall thickness, manufacturing process

(hot-finished or cold-drawn), end finish (plain end,

bevelled end, upset end, threaded, or threaded and

coupled), or surface finish. The subject imports are

further defined in the U.S. Department of

Commerce’s notices of preliminary determinations

of sales at less than fair value (60 FR 5348, January

27, 1995).

2Because Commerce’s preliminary antidumping

duty determination regarding Italy was negative, the

Commission is not instituting a final investigation

for Italy (No. 731–TA–710) at this time.

Nation of New York has identified the

belt as the Six Nations Council belt and

has requested its repatriation as an

object having ongoing importance

central to the tribe itself which could

not have been alienated, appropriated,

or conveyed by any individual.

Based on the above mentioned

information, officials of the Field

Museum have determined that,

pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (2), there is

a relationship of shared group identity

which can be reasonably traced between

this belt and the Oneida Indian Nation

of New York. Officials of the Field

Museum also recognize that the belt is

of ongoing importance central to the

Oneida Indian Nation but assert that the

museum has right of possession of the

belt. The Field Museum however, is

willing to return the belt under a

compromise of repatriation claim.

The Oneida Tribe of Indians of

Wisconsin have also claimed this belt in

a letter dated October 12, 1994.

Representatives of any other Indian tribe

that believes itself to be culturally

affiliated with this object should contact

Jonathan Haas, MacArthur Curator of

North American Anthropology, The

Field Museum of Natural History,

Roosevelt Road at Lake Shore Drive,

Chicago, IL 60605, telephone: (312)

922–9410, extension 641, before March

31, 1995.

Dated: February 23, 1995.

Francis P. McManamon,

Departmental Consulting Archeologist,

Chief, Archeological Assistance Division.

[FR Doc. 95–5043 Filed 2–28–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–70–F

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

COMMISSION

[Investigations Nos. 701–TA–287 and 731–

TA–378 (Final) (Remand)]

Certain Electrical Conductor Aluminum

Redraw Rod From Venezuela

AGENCY: International Trade

Commission.

ACTION: Notice of remand determination.

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives

notice of a final court decision affirming

its final negative determinations, made

pursuant to court remand, in the aboveidentified antidumping and

countervailing duty investigations.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Andrea C. Casson, Office of the General

Counsel, U.S. International Trade

Commission, 500 E Street, S.W.,

Washington, DC 20436; (202) 205–3105.

Hearing-impaired individuals are

advised that information on this matter

can be obtained by contacting the

Commission’s TDD terminal at (202)

205–1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In August 1988, the Commission

published its determinations that an

industry of the United States was

threatened with material injury by

reason of imports of electrical conductor

aluminum redraw rod (‘‘EC rod’’) from

Venezuela which the Department of

Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) had

determined are being subsidized and

sold at less than fair value. 53 F.R.

31111 (Aug. 17, 1988); Certain Electrical

Conductor Aluminum Redraw Rod from

Venezuela, Invs. Nos. 701–TA–287 and

731–TA–378 (Final), USITC Pub. 2103

(Aug. 1988). Suramerica de Aleaciones

Laminadas, C.A., a Venezuelan exporter

of EC rod, and others, sought review of

those final determinations in the Court

of International Trade (CIT).

On March 15, 1993, the CIT issued an

opinion and order, finding that the

Commission’s final affirmative threat

determinations were unsupported by

substantial evidence and otherwise not

in accordance with law. The CIT

reversed and remanded the

Commission’s original determinations.

Suramerica de Aleaciones Laminadas,

C.A. v. United States, 818 F. Supp. 348

(CIT 1993). In compliance with the

CIT’s remand order, the Commission, on

June 2, 1993, issued final remand

determinations finding that an industry

in the United States was not threatened

with material injury by reason of

imports of the subject EC rod. Certain

Electrical Conductor Aluminum Redraw

Rod from Venezuela, Invs. Nos. 701–

TA–287 and 731–TA–378 (Final)

(Remand), USITC Pub. 2860 (Feb. 1995).

The CIT sustained the remand

determinations. Suramerica de

Aleaciones Laminadas, C.A. v. United

States, 841 F. Supp. 1220 (Aug. 4, 1993).

Commerce published notice of the CIT’s

decision, pursuant to 19 U.S.C.

1516a(c)(1). 58 FR 52744 (Oct. 12, 1993).

In accordance with Timken Co. v.

United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir.

1990), Commerce stated that it would

continue the suspension of liquidation

of the subject merchandise. Commerce’s

notice also indicated that, if the CIT

decision was affirmed on appeal, the

antidumping and countervailing duty

orders would be revoked effective

August 14, 1993.

The Commission and petitioner

Southwire, Inc. appealed the CIT’s

decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for

the Federal Circuit. On December 30,

1994, the Court of Appeals affirmed the

CIT’s final judgment upholding the

Commission’s negative remand

determinations. Suramerica v. United

States, Nos. 93–1579 and 94–1021 (Fed.

Cir. Dec. 30, 1994). Southwire filed in

the Court of Appeals a petition for

rehearing and suggestion for rehearing

in banc. On February 13, 1995, the court

denied Southwire’s petition for

rehearing and declined the suggestion

for rehearing in banc. On February 17,

1995, the Court of Appeals issued its

mandate. The judicial proceedings

having ended and the final court

decision having been issued, the

Commission now, pursuant to 19 U.S.C.

1516a(e), publishes notice of the final

court decision affirming its negative

remand determinations.

By order of the Commission.

Issued: February 23, 1995.

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–5000 Filed 2–28–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

[Investigations Nos. 701–TA–362 and 731–

TA–707 through 709 (Final)]

Certain Seamless Carbon and Alloy

Standard, Line, and Pressure Steel

Pipe From Argentina, Brazil, Germany,

and Italy

AGENCY: International Trade

Commission.

ACTION: Institution and scheduling of

final antidumping investigations and

scheduling of the ongoing

countervailing duty investigation.

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives

notice of the institution of final

antidumping investigations Nos. 731–

TA–707 through 709 (Final) under

section 735(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930

(19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)) (the Act) to

determine whether an industry in the

United States is materially injured, or is

threatened with material injury, or the

establishment of an industry in the

United States is materially retarded, by

reason of imports of certain seamless

carbon and alloy standard, line, and

pressure steel pipe 1 from Argentina,

Brazil, and Germany.2 Such imports are