alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING CONSENT**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Premiere Global Services, Inc. (“PGI”) (formallyPTEK Holdings, Inc.) Nos. 333-11281, 333-17593, 333-29787, 333-39693, 333-52357, 333-79599, 333-87635, 333-89891, 333-51380, 333-57698, 333-67292, 333-101262 and 333-116506 on Form S-8 and Nos. 333-36557 and 333-109091 on Form S-3 of our reportsdated March 15, 2005, relating to the consolidated financial statements of PGI as of and for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 and management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,2004, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of PGI for the year ended December 31, 2004. 

 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

 

Atlanta, Georgia

March 14, 2005
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10(V)

                           VARSITY SPIRIT CORPORATION
                            2525 Horizon Lake Drive
                               Memphis, TN 38133
                             Memphis, TN 38184-1609
                                  901-387-4370
                            Toll Free: 800-238-0286
                               Fax: 901-387-4356

June 4, 1996

W. Kline Boyd
2525 Horizon Lake Drive
Memphis, TN 38133

RE: Extension of Employment Agreement

Dear Kline:

     This is to confirm the extension of the term of the Employment Agreement,
dated as of September 29, 1989, by and between you and Varsity Spirit
Corporation. Section 1 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to provide
as follows:

     1. Employment. The Company agrees to employ Executive and Executive accepts
such employment for the initial period beginning as of the date hereof
(September 29, 1989) and ending on September 28, 1997, subject to possible
earlier termination pursuant to paragraph 1(d) hereof (the "Employment Period").

     Please indicate your agreement with the amendment set forth above by
executing this extension agreement in the space provided below and returning an
executed copy of this agreement to the undersigned.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Jeffrey G. Webb

Jeffrey G. Webb
President
Varsity Spirit Corporation

Accepted and agreed to this 20th day of June, 1996

[NAME OF EMPLOYEE]

/s/ W. Kline Boyd
--------------------
(Signature)
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.16

SECOND AMENDMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


        This Second Amendment of Employment Agreement (this "Amendment") is
entered into as of December 2, 2000 by and between SciClone Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. (the "Company") and Donald R. Sellers (the "Employee").

        WHEREAS, the Company and Employee entered into that certain Employment
Agreement dated February 1, 1996 (the "Original Agreement"), which was
subsequently amended pursuant to the Amendment of Employment Agreement (the
"First Amendment")(the Original Agreement and the First Amendment collectively
referred to as the "Agreement").

        WHEREAS, the Company and Employee desire to further amend the Agreement
to (a) extend the termination date of the Agreement as set forth in Paragraph
4.1 of the Agreement and (b) increase the base salary of Employee as set forth
in Paragraph 3.1 of the Agreement.

        NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and Employee agree that:

        1.      The date "November 30, 1998" in Paragraph 4.1 is amended to
                "November 30, 2001."

        2.      The first sentence of Paragraph 3.1 is amended in its entirety
                to read as set forth below:

                The Company agrees to pay Employee a base salary of $400,000;
                provided, however, that Employee has been awarded a salary
                increase to be commenced at his discretion. Employee has advised
                the Company that the new salary will be effective January 1,
                2001. Therefore, the Company shall pay Employee a base salary of
                $432,000 (the "New Salary") effective as of that date.

        3.      All other terms, conditions and restrictions contained in the
                Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.

        Pursuant to Section 6.5 of the Agreement, this Amendment when fully
executed and delivered shall constitute an amendment thereto.






                   [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALY LEFT BLANK]



<PAGE>   2

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Second
Amendment of Employment Agreement as of the day and year first above written.


                                           "COMPANY"
                                           SCICLONE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.


                                           By
                                             ---------------------------

                                           Its
                                              --------------------------

                                           "EMPLOYEE"



                                           -----------------------------
                                           Donald R. Sellers


















                       [SIGNATURE PAGE TO SECOND AMENDMENT
                            OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT]
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 42 (Friday, March 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11975-11976]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5233]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
Heart, Lung, and Blood Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meeting:

    Name of SEP: Program Project: Coronary Atherosclerosis in Female 
Monkeys.
    Date: March 16-17, 1995.
    Time: 7:30 p.m.
    Place: The Hawthorne Inn & Conference Center, Winston-Salem, 
North Carolina. [[Page 11976]] 
    Contact Person: Anthony M. Coelho, Jr., Ph.D., 5333 Westbard 
Avenue, Room 548, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, (301) 594-7485.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Programs Nos. 93.837, Heart 
and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; and 
93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes 
of Health)

    Dated: February 24, 1995.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 95-5233 Filed 3-2-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
**EXHIBIT 10.74**

 

**AGREEMENT FOR ASSIGNMENT OF STOCK OPTIONS**

 

THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 5th day of February, 1999, by and among Boland T. Jones (“BTJ”);Seven Gables Management Company, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company (the “LLC”); Seven Gables Partnership, L.P., a Georgia limited partnership (the “Partnership”); and Premiere Technologies, Inc., a Georgia corporation(“Premiere”). 

 

BTJ owns, before the transferdescribed below, One Million Four Hundred Forty Thousand (1,440,000) nonqualified stock options (the “Options”) of Premiere, with vesting dates of November 6, 1996, 1997 and 1998, granted under that certain Amended and Restated ExecutiveEmployment and Incentive Option Agreement dated November 6, 1995 (the “Agreement”). 

 

BTJ hereby transfers, assigns, conveys and sets over to the Partnership, its successors, representatives and assigns, as a contribution to the capital of the Partnership, all of his right, title and interest in and tothe Options, together with all the powers, options, privileges and immunities therein contained. 

 

Pursuant to Sections 2.2.5 and 17 of the Agreement, Premiere hereby consents to the transfer described above (the “Transfer”) and acknowledgesand agrees that this instrument of transfer is in form and substance satisfactory to Premiere and that the Transfer is in full compliance with the Agreement. With respect to the Transfer, Premiere hereby waives any requirement of an opinion ofcounsel regarding federal or state securities laws. 

 

After theTransfer, the Partnership is the owner of the Options. The Partnership, and the LLC as general partner of the Partnership, hereby accept and agree to be bound by all of the terms and provisions of the Agreement relating to the Options and any sharesof stock issuable upon exercise of the Options. 

 

This Agreementmay be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original, but all of which taken together will constitute one and the same instrument. 

 

 

[SIGNATURES ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE] 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement for Assignment of Stock Options,Premiere acting by and through its duly authorized officer, this 5th day of February, 1999. 

 

PREMIERE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
By: /s/ Patrick G. Jones    
Title: Sr. V.P.

 

 

SEVEN GABLES MANAGEMENT

COMPANY, LLC

 
 By: /s/ Boland T. Jones   
Boland T. Jones, Member

 

 
 By: /s/ Andrea L. Jones   
Andrea L. Jones, Member

 

 

 

 

[SIGNATURES CONTINUE ON FOLLOWING PAGE] 

SEVEN GABLES PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
By: Seven Gables Management  
Company, LLC General Partner

 

 
 By: /s/ Boland T. Jones   
Boland T. Jones, Member

 

 
 By: /s/ Andrea L. Jones   
Andrea L. Jones, Member
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum

opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain

computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of

Appeals and does not include the filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,

3 Plaintiff-Appellee,

4 v. NO. A-1-CA-36421

5 KERRY D. ELDER and KATHERINE 

6 E. DOYLE, Husband and Wife,

7 Defendants,

8 and

9 MUKHTIAR KHALSA,

10 Putative Intervenor-Appellant.

11 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY

12 Valerie A. Huling, District Judge 

13 Snell & Wilmer, LLP

14 Sandra A. Brown

15 Phoenix, AZ 

16 McCarthy & Holthus, LLP

17 Jade D. Rotunda

18 Albuquerque, NM 

19 for Appellee
2

1 Mukhtiar S. Khalsa

2 Santa Cruz, NM 

3 Pro Se Appellant

4 MEMORANDUM OPINION

5 VANZI, Chief Judge.

6 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of

7 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has

8 been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

9 {2} AFFIRMED.

10 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

11 __________________________________

12 LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge

13 WE CONCUR:

14 _________________________________

15 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge

16 _________________________________

17 JULIE J. VARGAS, Judge
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 17

- 00181

- CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS

v. RAMIRO GARCIA LOPEZ JR.
On Appeal from the 430th District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Cause No. CR

- 2108

- 16

- J

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with its opinio n

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. August 9, 2018
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 32 (Thursday, February 18, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 8186]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-03326]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER16-904-000]


Smith Creek Hydro, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Smith Creek Hydro, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes 
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is March 1, 2016.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the 
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an 
eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive 
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). 
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#04424156474b6a686d6a61577174746b767044626176672a636b72"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cb8d8e998884a5a7a2a5ae98bebbbba4b9bf8badaeb9a8e5aca4bd">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: February 10, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-03326 Filed 2-17-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 28, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10843-10844]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4815]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-165-000]


Pacific Gas Transmission Co.; Notice of Proposed Changes to FERC 
Gas Tariff

February 22, 1995.
    Take notice that on February 17, 1995, Pacific Gas Transmission 
Company (PGT) tendered for filing certain revised tariff sheets to be a 
part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1-A and Second 
Revised Volume No. 1 and requested that they be made effective March 
19, 1995.
    PGT states that the tariff sheets which it is submitting eliminate 
an ambiguity in calculating the Reservation Charge credit mechanism for 
Rate Schedules T- [[Page 10844]] 3 and FTS-1. In addition, PGT is 
correcting minor typographical errors to the table of contents of the 
Transportation Terms and Conditions of its First Revised Volume No. 1-
A.
    PGT further states it has served a copy of this filing upon all 
interested state regulatory agencies and PGT's jurisdictional 
customers.
    Any person desiring to be heard or protest said filing should file 
a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure. All such motions or protests should be filed 
on or before March 2, 1995. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-4815 Filed 2-27-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Second Declaration of Amendment



 Exhibit 10.1 
 H.B. FULLER COMPANY 
 SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN 11—2008

 Second Declaration of Amendment 
 Pursuant to Section 6.10 of the H.B. Fuller Company Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan 11—2008 (the “Plan”), the Company hereby amends the Plan effective June 1, 2011, as
follows: 
 1. Each reference in the Plan to the H.B. Fuller Company Retirement Plan shall be replaced with the “H.B.
Fuller Legacy Pension Plan.” 
 2. Subsection A of Section 3.3 is amended by removing “and” at the end of
paragraph (3), replacing the “.” at the end of paragraph (4) with “; and” and adding a new paragraph (5) to read as follows: 
 (5) with respect to any Participant who accrues an additional benefit under this Plan on and after June 1, 2011, the annual amount determined by converting the nominal account offset balance (as
defined below) as of the commencement date of the benefit under this Plan into an actuarial equivalent annuity payable annually for the life of the Participant starting as of such commencement date. The “nominal account offset balance” for
this purpose means the balance that the Participant would have in his/her Nonelective Contribution Account under the H.B. Fuller Company 401 (k) & Retirement Plan based upon Nonelective Contributions made on and after June 1, 2011 if
such account were credited with such contributions and eamings at an annual rate of seven percent (7%) (disregarding the actual eamings or losses on such account). “Actuarial equivalence” shall be determined using the standards
specified in Section 6.2. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this instrument to be executed by its duly authorized officer.

 Dated: May 31, 2011 
  

	
	H.B. FULLER COMPANY
	
	 /s/ James. J. Owens

	President and Chief Executive Officer


  

	
	ATTEST:
	
	 /s/ T. J. Keenan

	Secretary or Assistant Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           7,806
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   81,451
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,232
<INVENTORY>                                      7,139
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               102,537
<PP&E>                                           8,119
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,426
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 274,378
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          143,642
<BONDS>                                         57,642
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           255
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,267
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   274,378
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               325,838
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  118,868
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               206,518
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,226
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (774)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (309)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (465)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (465)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-5095

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

REGINALD TODD BRIGGS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,

Chief District Judge. (CR-01-291)

Submitted: May 26, 2006 Decided: June 9, 2006

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Louis C. Allen, III, Federal Public Defender, William C. Ingram,

Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellant. Angela Hewlett Miller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES

ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Following a hearing at which Reginald Todd Briggs

admitted to violating conditions of his supervised release, the

district court revoked Briggs’ release and imposed an eight-month

sentence, to be followed by a supervised release term of fortyseven months. Briggs appeals. His attorney has filed a brief in

accordance with Anders v. California, 367 U.S. 738 (1967), stating

that there are no meritorious grounds for appeal but asserting that

the sentence is erroneous. Briggs was advised of his right to file

a pro se supplemental brief, but did not file such a brief. We

affirm. 

In accordance with United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220

(2005), a sentencing court should determine the sentencing range

under the sentencing guidelines, consider the factors set forth at

18 U.S.C.A. § 3553(a) (West 2000 & Supp. 2005), and impose a

reasonable sentence within the statutory maximum. See United

States v. Hughes, 401 F.3d 540, 546-47 (4th Cir. 2005). “A

sentence imposed within the properly calculated Guidelines range

. . . is presumptively reasonable.” United States v. Green, 436

F.3d 449, 455-56 (4th Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). Under these principles, we conclude that

Briggs’ sentence, which falls below the statutory maximum and

within the properly calculated guideline range, is reasonable.
- 3 -

In accordance with Anders, we have reviewed the entire

record for any meritorious issues and have found none.

Accordingly, we affirm. This court requires counsel to inform his

client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of

the United States for further review. If the client requests that

a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition

would be frivolous, then counsel may move this court for leave to

withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a

copy of the motion was served on the client. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately set

forth in the materials before the court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED