alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 38 (Monday, February 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 10609]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4750]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[AZ-010-95-1610]


Arizona Strip District Resource Management Plan: Intent to Amend

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of intent to amend the Arizona Strip District Resource 
Management Plan, Arizona.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------I
59

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the BLM Planning Regulations (43 CFR part 1600) 
this notice advises the public that the Arizona Strip District, Bureau 
of Land Management, is proposing to amend the Arizona Strip District 
Resource Management Plan in order to implement management practices 
that will help recover the Northeastern Mojave Desert population of 
desert tortoises. The main issues anticipated in this plan amendment 
are: (1) recovery of the northeastern Mojave Desert population of 
desert tortoises, listed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as 
threatened; and (2) impacts on existing and future uses of resources on 
public lands in the Mojave Desert managed by the Arizona Strip 
District.
    This amendment is limited to the area categorized as desert 
tortoise habitat (Arizona Strip Resource Management Plan, 1991) or 
designated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as critical habitat 
for desert tortoises.
    A land use plan amendment and environmental analysis will be 
prepared for the subject lands by an interdisciplinary team including 
range, wildlife, recreation, minerals, lands and realty, and cultural 
resource specialists. The existing land use plans and maps are 
available for review at the Shivwits Resource Area Office in St. 
George, Utah.

DATES: Interested parties may submit comments to the District Manager 
at the address shown below on or before May 5, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent to the District Manager, Bureau of 
Land Management, Arizona Strip District, 390 North 3050 East, St. 
George, Utah 84770.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George Cropper, Area Manager, Shivwits 
Resource Area, 345 E. Riverside Drive, Suite 103, St. George, Utah 
84770, (801) 628-4491 to obtain additional information regarding this 
plan amendment.
Roger G. Taylor,
District Manager.
[FR Doc. 95-4750 Filed 2-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-32-P
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 20, 2024.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, September 20, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A25I0033. KEVIN EUGENE TANNER v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

SUCR2023000023
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 47 (Friday, March 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13155]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5989]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-5168-5]


Agency Information Collection Activities Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 
et seq.), this notice announces that the Information Collection Request 
(ICR) abstracted below has been forwarded to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The ICR describes the nature 
of the information collection and its expected cost and burden.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before April 10, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information or a copy call 
Sandy Farmer at EPA, (202) 260-2740, please refer to EPA ICR # 1741.01.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxics

    Title: Correction of Misreported Chemical Substances on the Toxic 
Substances Control Act (TSCA) Control Substances Inventory (EPA ICR No. 
1741.01). This is a new collection.
    Abstract: Members of the chemical industry, who misreported 
chemical substances on the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Chemical 
Substances Inventory, may submit corrections on Form C. The information 
on Form C allows OPPT to establish a correct chemical identity which 
accurately reflects the substance the submitter manufacturers.
    Burden Statement: Burden for this collection of information is 
estimated to average 1 hour per respondent for reporting. There is no 
recordkeeping requirement. This estimate includes the time needed to 
review instructions, gather and submit the information, and report the 
information.
    Respondents: Manufacturers and importers of chemical substances.
    Estimated number of respondents: 200 respondents.
    Estimated number of responses per respondents: 1.
    Estimated total annual burden on respondents: 200 hours.
    Frequency of collection: As need arises.
    Send comments regarding the burden estimate, or any other aspect of 
the information collection, including suggestions for reducing the 
burden to:

Sandy Farmer, EPA ICR # 1741.01, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 
Information Policy Branch (2136), 401 M Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20460.

and

Tim Hunt, Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs, 725 17th Street, NW.,Washington, DC 20503.

    Dated: March 3, 1995.
Paul Lapsley,
Director, Regulatory Management Division.
[FR Doc. 95-5989 Filed 3-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
#### THE CLAYTON BANKING COMPANY et al. v. THE FARMERS BANK et al.

(Filed 17 March, 1937.)

Appeal and Error § 6d—

Where the correctness of the court’s ruling upon a motion is dependent upon facts *aliunde*or *dehors*the record, appellant must request the court to find the facts, otherwise it will be presumed that the court found facts in support of the judgment, and the judgment will be affirmed.

Appeal by defendant L. T. Rose from *Granmer, J.,*at September Term, 1936, of JohNstow.

Motion to vacate order of confirmation.

At the April Term, 1936, Johnston Superior Court, there was verdict and judgment for plaintiffs in the above entitled cause, and order appointing commissioner and directing sale of collateral to be applied on judgment. The commissioner made sale of collateral and recommended confirmation 19 June, 1936. Order of confirmation was entered at “Smithfield, this 24th day of June, 1936. N. A. Sinclair, Judge,” etc.

*329Motion was made at the September Term, 1936, to vacate said order of confirmation on the ground of irregularity. The motion was denied, “it appearing to tbe court that the sale was in all respects regular and in accordance with the judgment of the court entered at the April Term.”

Movant appeals, assigning errors.

*Parker ■& Lee for L. T. Rose, appellant.*

*Abell & Shepard for appellees.*

Stacy, 0. J.

Even if it be conceded that the original order of confirmation was irregularly entered, still no harm seems to have come to movant, as later decreed by the judgment at the September Term, which also apparently amounts to an order of confirmation. But, however this may be, the record is barren of any factual determination upon which a reversal of the judgment could be predicated. *Hospital v. Rockingham County, ante,*205.

In a motion of this kind, where .the correctness of the court’s ruling is dependent upon facts *aliunde*or *dehors*the record, a request should be made that the facts be found, otherwise it will be presumed that they were determined in support of the judgment. *Dunn v. Wilson,*210 N. C., 493, 187 S. E., 802; *Powell v. Bladen County,*206 N. C., 46, 173 S. E., 50; *S. v. Dalton, ibid.,*507, 174 S. E., 422; *Comr. of Revenue v. Realty Co.,*204 N. C., 123, 167 S. E., 563; *S. v. Harris, ibid.,*422, 168 S. E., 498; *Rutledge v. Fitzgerald,*197 N. C., 163, 147 S. E., 816; *Holcomb v. Holcomb,*192 N. C., 504, 135 S. E., 287; *Mfg. Co. v. Foy Seawell Lbr. Co.,*177 N. C., 404, 99 S. E., 104; *Gardiner v. May,*172 N. C., 192, 89 S. E., 955; *Lumber Co. v. Buhmann,*160 N. C., 385, 75 S. E., 1008.

On the record as presented, no error is apparent.

Affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-50057 Summary Calendar

CLAUDETTE M. LOPEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JOHN LaCOKE, Associate Chief of the Internal Revenue Service, Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-00-CV-840

-------------------- September 6, 2001 Before DeMOSS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Claudette M. Lopez appeals from the dismissal of her tax complaint in district court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Lopez devoted the entirety of her initial brief to the court’s dismissal on the grounds of timeliness of her petition. The district court did not dismiss Lopez’s complaint as untimely. Rather, the district court dismissed Lopez’s petition exclusively because the “[t]ax court is the court ofNo. 01-50057 -2- proper jurisdiction, as this matter involves liability for payment of federal income tax.” See 26 U.S.C. § 6330. Not until her reply brief does Lopez address the court’s jurisdictional dismissal pursuant to § 6330. This court does not consider issues raised for the first time in a reply brief. Taita Chemical Co. Ltd. v. Westlake Styrene Corp ., 246 F.3d 377, 384 n. 9 (5th Cir. 2001)(finding that the appellant could not preserve error on claims through a reply brief). Accordingly, Lopez has waived the only arguable issue before this court.
AFFIRMED.
#### HERMAN NEWBERN v. *L.*S. GORDON.

(Filed 16 September, 1931.)

Trial G b — Verdict should establish facts sufficient to enable the court to proceed to judgment.

The verdict of the jury upon disputed questions of fact arising upon the evidence must be sufficient to enable the court to proceed to judgment, and where the recovery of usury is sought in the action a verdict establishing the amount of the interest charged is insufficient without a finding that usury was exacted, or, if so, that it was knowingly done, and where the insufficiency cannot be determined by proper reference to the pleadings the evidence and admissions of the parties and the charge of the court, a new trial will be ordered on appeal.

Appeal by defendant from *Grady, J.,*at June Term, 1931, of PasquotaNk.

Civil action in the nature of an action for debt to recover penalty for alleged exaction of usury, knowingly made.

Upon denial of liability and issues joined, the jury returned the following verdict:

“1. What amount of interest has been collected by the defendant from Herman Newhern on the $4,000 note, made to him by I. M. Meekins, and secured by note and mortgage of Herman Newhern to I. M. Meekins? Answer: $1,920.

“2. What amount is the plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendant as penalty for usury? Answer:.”

Judgment on the verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $3,840 and costs, from which the defendant appeals, assigning errors.

*M. B. Simpson and Thompson & Wilson for plaintiff.*

*Worth & Horner and Ward & Grimes for defendant.*

*318Stacy, C. J.

The verdict is not determinative of the controversy. It is inconclusive and therefore insufficient to support the judgment. *Bank v. Broom Co.,*188 N. C., 508, 125 S. E., 12.

In an action involving disputed questions, the verdict should establish facts sufficient to enable the court to proceed to judgment. *Chapman-Hunt Co. v. Board of Education,*198 N. C., 111, 150 S. E., 113. Here, there is no finding by the jury that usury was exacted, or, if so, that it was done knowingly. C. S., 2306.

Nor is the verdict capable of interpretation, so as to support the judgment *quod recuperet,*by proper reference to the pleadings, the evidence, admissions of the parties, and the charge of the court. *Short v. Kaltman,*192 N. C., 154, 134 S. E., 425; *Kannan v. Assad,*182 N. C., 77, 108 S. E., 383.

A new trial will be awarded on authority of *Plotkin v. Bond Co.,*200 N. C., 590, 151 S. E., 870, and cases there cited.

New trial.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-10517

Bizlink Technology:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Honey Bee Breeding, Genetics, and Physiology Research: Baton Rouge, LA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Quick Links
                        Varroa Sensitive Hygiene (VSH)
                                    Russian Honey Bees
                                    Measuring Varroa Mite Population
                                    Small Hive Beetles
                                    Tracheal Mite Resistance
                                    History of the Bee LabSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Baton Rouge, Louisiana Honey Bee Lab Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications
- Video and Audio
- Publications
- Annual Field Day
- History
- Varroa Sensitive Hygiene
- Russian Honey Bees
- Small Hive Beetles
- Tracheal Mite Resistant Bees

Research Projects Subjects of Investigation at this LocationEach ARS research project has related subjects of investigation.  Listed below are the subjects of investigation currently conducted at this location.
Clicking on a subject of investigation will list the research projects within that  subject of investigation.Subjects of Investigation
                            Honey bees


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel; Grant Review for NHLBI K Award Recipients.                    

*Date:*                         March 1, 2016.                    

*Time:*                         8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Bethesda Marriott Suites, 6711 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20817.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Melissa E Nagelin, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7202, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-0297,                         *nagelinmh2@nhlbi.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 2, 2016.

Michelle Trout, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2016-02316 Filed 2-5-16; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Year Cost Rate

Income 

Rate

Annual 

Balance

2008 11.20 12.77 1.57 359

2009 11.26 12.81 1.54 369

2010 11.36 12.82 1.46 379

2011 11.52 12.84 1.32 387

2012 11.74 12.87 1.13 392

2013 11.99 12.90 0.91 396

2014 12.26 12.91 0.65 397

2015 12.54 12.94 0.40 397

2016 12.83 12.96 0.13 394

2017 13.12 12.98 -0.14 390

2018 13.39 13.00 -0.39 386

2019 13.67 13.02 -0.65 379

2020 13.95 13.04 -0.91 372

2021 14.21 13.05 -1.16 363

2022 14.46 13.07 -1.39 354

2023 14.70 13.08 -1.62 343

2024 14.93 13.10 -1.83 332

2025 15.15 13.11 -2.04 320

2026 15.36 13.13 -2.23 307

2027 15.56 13.14 -2.42 293

2028 15.74 13.15 -2.59 279

2029 15.91 13.17 -2.75 263

2030 16.06 13.18 -2.88 248

2031 16.18 13.18 -3.00 231

2032 16.29 13.19 -3.09 215

2033 16.36 13.20 -3.17 198

2034 16.41 13.20 -3.21 181

2035 16.45 13.21 -3.24 164

2036 16.47 13.21 -3.26 146

2037 16.47 13.21 -3.26 128

2038 16.46 13.21 -3.25 111

2039 16.43 13.21 -3.22 93

2040 16.40 13.21 -3.18 75

2041 16.36 13.21 -3.14 57

2042 16.31 13.21 -3.10 38

2043 16.27 13.21 -3.06 20

2044 16.23 13.21 -3.02 2

2045 16.19 13.21 -2.99 ----

2046 16.16 13.21 -2.96 ----

2047 16.14 13.21 -2.93 ----

2048 16.11 13.21 -2.91 ----

2049 16.10 13.20 -2.89 ----

2050 16.08 13.21 -2.88 ----

2051 16.08 13.21 -2.88 ----

2052 16.09 13.21 -2.88 ----

2053 16.09 13.21 -2.89 ----

2054 16.10 13.21 -2.90 ----

2055 16.12 13.21 -2.91 ----

2056 16.14 13.21 -2.93 ----

2057 16.17 13.21 -2.95 ----

2058 16.19 13.22 -2.98 ----

2059 16.22 13.22 -3.00 ----

2060 16.24 13.22 -3.02 ----

2061 16.26 13.22 -3.04 ----

2062 16.29 13.22 -3.06 ----

2063 16.31 13.23 -3.09 ----

2064 16.34 13.23 -3.11 ----

2065 16.37 13.23 -3.14 ----

Detailed Single Year Tables

Category of Change: Level of Monthly Benefits (PIA)

Proposed Provision: Increase the number of years used to calculate benefits for retirees and survivors 

(but not for disabled workers) from 35 to 38, phased in 2009-2013

Expressed as a percentage of taxable payrol Trust Fund 

Ratio 

1-1-year
2066 16.40 13.23 -3.17 ----

2067 16.43 13.23 -3.20 ----

2068 16.46 13.24 -3.22 ----

2069 16.49 13.24 -3.25 ----

2070 16.53 13.24 -3.29 ----

2071 16.57 13.24 -3.32 ----

2072 16.60 13.24 -3.36 ----

2073 16.64 13.25 -3.39 ----

2074 16.68 13.25 -3.43 ----

2075 16.72 13.25 -3.47 ----

2076 16.76 13.25 -3.51 ----

2077 16.80 13.26 -3.55 ----

2078 16.85 13.26 -3.59 ----

2079 16.89 13.26 -3.63 ----

2080 16.94 13.26 -3.67 ----

2081 16.98 13.27 -3.72 ----

2082 17.03 13.27 -3.76 ----

2083 17.07 13.27 -3.80 ----

2084 17.12 13.27 -3.84 ----

2085 17.16 13.28 -3.88 ----

Summarized Rates: OASDI

2008 Cost Rate Income Rate

Actuarial 

Balance

-2082 15.31% 13.92% -1.39% 0.31%

Office of the Chief Actuary, Social Security

Estimates based on Intermediate Assumptions of the 2008 Trustees Report

Change in 

Actuarial Balance

July 18, 2008