Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 42 / Friday, March 3, 1995 / Notices 11965

the Commission’s official service list for

this proceeding. A comment period will

be allotted for review if the EA is

published. We will consider all

comments on the EA before we

recommend that the Commission

approve or not approve the project.

Currently Identified Environmental

Issues

We have already identified several

issues that we think deserve attention

based on a preliminary review of the

proposed facility and the environmental

information provided by CNG. Keep in

mind that this is a preliminary list. The

list of issues may be added to,

subtracted from, or changed based on

your comments and our analysis. Issues

are:

• The proposed loop would cross

Poentic Kill, Plotter Kill and six other

small, unnamed streams or drains.

Poentic Kill is a state-protected stream.

• About 2.2 acres of wetlands would

be affected by the project.

• About 15 acres of upland forest

would be disturbed.

• The Plotter Kill Nature Preserve

would be crossed.

Public Participation

You can make a difference by sending

a letter addressing your specific

comments or concerns about the project.

You should focus on the potential

environmental effects of the proposal,

alternatives to the proposal (including

alternative routes), and measures to

avoid or lessen environmental impact.

The more specific your comments, the

more useful they will be. Please follow

the instructions below to ensure that

your comments are received and

properly recorded:

• Address your letter to: Lois Cashell,

Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission, 825 North Capitol St., NE.,

Washington, DC 20426;

• Reference Docket No. CP95–109–

000;

• Send a copy of your letter to: Mr.

Howard J. Wheeler, EA Project Manager,

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol St., NE., Room 7312,

Washington, DC 20426; and

• Mail your comments so that they

will be received in Washington, DC on

or before April 5, 1995.

If you wish to receive a copy of the

EA, you should request one from Mr.

Wheeler at the above address.

Becoming an Intervenor

In addition to involvement in the EA

scoping process, you may want to

become an official party to the

proceeding or become an ‘‘intervenor’’.

Among other things, intervenors have

the right to receive copies of caserelated Commission documents and

filings by other intervenors. Likewise,

each intervenor must provide copies of

its filings to all other parties. If you

want to become an intervenor you must

file a Motion to Intervene according to

Rule 214 of the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure (18 CFR

358.214) attached as appendix 2.

The date for filing timely motions to

intervene in this proceeding has passed.

Therefore, parties now seeking to file

late interventions must show good

cause, as required by section

385.214(b)(3), why this time limitation

should be waived. Environmental issues

have been viewed as good cause for late

intervention. You do not need

intervenor status to have your scoping

comments considered.

Additional information about the

proposed project is available from Mr.

Howard Wheeler, EA Project Manager,

at (202) 208–2299.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–5224 Filed 3–2–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. CP94–38–000]

Ouachita River Gas Storage Company,

L.L.C.; Notice of Availability of the

Environmental Assessment for the

Proposed Ouachita River Gas Storage

Project

February 27, 1995.

The staff of the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission (FERC or

Commission) has prepared an

environmental assessment (EA) on the

natural gas pipeline facilities proposed

by Ouachita River Gas Storage

Company, L.L.C. (Ouachita) in the

above-referenced docket.

The EA was prepared to satisfy the

requirements of the National

Environmental Policy Act. The staff

concludes that approval of the proposed

project, with appropriate mitigating

measures, would not constitute a major

Federal action significantly affecting the

quality of the human environment.

The EA assesses the potential

environmental effects of the

construction and operation of the

proposed underground gas storage

facility and related hub facilities

including:

• About 5 miles of 6-, 8-, and 12-inchdiameter field gathering lines

(designated as Lines FG–1, FG–2, and

FG–3) in Lincoln and Union Parishes,

Louisiana;

• About 2.6 miles of dual 24-inchdiameter header pipeline (designated as

Lines B and C) and four meter stations

in Ouachita Parish, Louisiana;

• About 23.9 miles of 24-inchdiameter bi-directional flow

transmission pipeline (Line A) in

Lincoln, Union, and Ouachita Parishes,

Louisiana;

• About 4.5 miles of 16-inch-diameter

bi-directional flow transmission

pipeline (line D) and one meter station

in Ouachita Parish, Louisiana;

• A 6,260-horsepower (hp) Remote

Compressor Station in Ouachita Parish,

Louisiana;

• A 12,520-hp Central Compressor

Station in Section 30–T19N–R1W,

Union Parish, Louisiana; and

• Drill 11 injection/withdrawal wells

and 2 observation wells in Lincoln and

Union Parishes, Louisiana.

The purpose of the proposed facilities

would be to provide about 27 billion

cubic feet of working gas capacity with

an estimated peak withdrawal capacity

of 550 MMcf of gas a day and an

estimated peak injection capacity of 250

MMcf of gas a day via the hub facilities.

The hub facilities near Monroe,

Louisiana would be interconnected with

certain interstate and intrastate

pipelines.

The EA has been placed in the public

files of the FERC and is available for

public inspection at: Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission, Public

Reference and Files Maintenance

Branch, 941 North Capitol Street, NE.,

room 3104, Washington, DC 20426,

(202) 208–1371.

Copies of the EA have been mailed to

Federal, State and local agencies, public

interest groups, interested individuals,

newspapers, and parties to this

proceeding.

A limited number of copies of the EA

are available from: Mr. Herman Der,

Environmental Project Manager,

Environmental Review and Compliance

Branch I, Office of Pipeline Regulation,

room 7312, 825 North Capitol Street,

NE., Washington, DC 20426, (202) 208–

0896.

Any person wishing to comment on

the EA may do so. Written comments

must reference Docket No. CP94–38–

000, and be addressed to: Office of the

Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission, 825 North Capitol Street,

NE., Washington, DC. 20426.

Comments should be filed as soon as

possible, but must be received no later

than April 3, 1995, to ensure

consideration prior to a Commission

decision on this proposal. A copy of any

comments should also be sent to Mr.

Herman Der, Environmental Project

Manager, room 7312, at the above

address.
11966 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 42 / Friday, March 3, 1995 / Notices

Comments will be considered by the

Commission but will not serve to make

the commentor a party to the

proceeding. Any person seeking to

become a party to the proceeding must

file a motion to intervene pursuant to

Rule 214 of the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedures (18 CFR

385.214).

The date for filing timely motions to

intervene in this proceeding has passed.

Therefore, parties now seeking to file

late interventions must show good

cause, as required by section

385.214(b)(3), why this time limitation

should be waived. Environmental issues

have been viewed as good cause for late

intervention. You do not need

interventor status to have your

comments considered.

Additional information about this

project is available from Mr. Herman

Der, Environmental Project Manager.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–5223 Filed 3–2–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. CP95–219–000]

ANR Pipeline Co.; Notice of Request

Under Blanket Authorization

February 27, 1995.

Take notice that no February 22, 1995,

ANR Pipeline Company (ANR), 500

Renaissance Center, Detroit, Michigan

48243, filed in Docket No. CP95–219–

000 a request pursuant to § 157.205 and

157.211 of the Commission’s

Regulations under the Natural Gas Act

(18 CFR 157.205, 157.211) to operate

facilities, which were constructed

pursuant to Section 311 of the Natural

Gas Policy Act of 1978, under ANR’s

blanket certificate issued in Docket No.

CP82–480–000 pursuant to Section 7 of

the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set

forth in the request that is on file with

the Commission and open to public

inspection.

ANR seeks authorization to operate an

interconnection (Edon Interconnection)

under provisions of Section 7(c) of the

Natural Gas Act. The Edon

Interconnection allows an existing

customer Ohio Gas Company, to deliver

natural gas to the town of Edon, Ohio

providing service to residential

customers. The Edon Interconnection is

located in Williams County, Ohio. The

facilities consist of two 4-inch hot taps

and metering facilities. The two 4-inch

hot taps are located on ANR’s existing

24-inch and 22-inch pipelines that

connect to the metering facilities. The

metering facilities consist of one 2-inch

positive displacement meter, one 2-inch

turbine meter and one electronic

measurement computer all contained

within a metering building. ANR states

that the total cost of the facilities is

approximately $171,000. ANR states

that the capacity of the facilities is

approximately 5,500 Mcf per day at 600

psig.

ANR states that authorization for the

addition and operation of the Edon

Interconnection will not impact ANR’s

gas supply situation and that deliveries

of natural gas at this point can be made

without detriment or disadvantage to

any existing customer.

Any person or the Commission’s staff

may, within 45 days after issuance of

the instant notice by the Commission,

file pursuant to Rule 214 of the

Commission’s Procedural Rules (18 CFR

385.214) a motion to intervene or notice

of intervention and pursuant to

§ 157.205 of the Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a

protest to the request. If no protest is

filed within the time allowed therefor,

the proposed activity shall be deemed to

be authorized effective the day after the

time allowed for filing a protest. If a

protest is filed and not withdrawn

within 30 days after the time allowed

for filing a protest, the instant request

shall be treated as an application for

authorization pursuant to Section 7 of

the Natural Gas Act.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–5225 Filed 3–2–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. PR94–16–000]

Southern California Gas Co.; Informal

Settlement Conference

February 27, 1995.

Take notice that an informal

settlement conference in the abovecaptioned proceeding will be held on

Friday, March 10, 1995 at 10:00 a.m. in

a room to be designated at the offices of

the Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission, 825 North Capitol Street,

NE., Washington, DC 20426.

Attendance will be limited to the

parties and participants, as defined by

18 CFR 385.102 (b) and (c). Persons

wishing to become a party must move

to intervene and receive intervenor

status pursuant to § 385.214 of the

Commission’s regulations.

For additional information, please

contact Mark E. Hegerle at (202) 208–

0287.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–5226 Filed 3–2–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. RP91–203–000, et al. (Phase

II)]

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.; Informal

Settlement Conference

February 27, 1995.

Take notice that an informal

settlement conference will be convened

in this proceeding on Tuesday, March

14, 1995, at 10:00 a.m., at the offices of

the Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission, 810 First Street, NE.,

Washington, DC, for the purpose of

exploring the possible settlement of the

above-referenced docket.

Any party, as defined by 18 CFR

385.102(c), or any participant as defined

in 18 CFR 385.102(b), is invited to

attend. Persons wishing to become a

party must move to intervene and

receive intervenor status pursuant to the

Commission’s regulations (18 CFR

385.214).

For additional information, please

contact Dennis H. Melvin (202) 208–

0042 Donald Williams (202) 208–0743.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–5227 Filed 3–2–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. RP94–352–002]

Western Gas Interstate Co.;

Compliance Filing

February 27, 1995.

Take notice that on February 17, 1995,

Western Gas Interstate Company

(Western) in compliance with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

s (Commission) order of December 19,

1994, Western is filing a report showing

the final balances of Account No. 191

and detailing any amounts collected or

disbursed to date of the report including

all schedules pertinent to annual PGA

filings, i.e., Schedules A, B, C1, C2 and

D. This filing also includes tariff sheets

specifying the effective date of the

billings, the customers billed and the

amounts. Western has not included any

information concerning the nine month

payment option because there were not

any provisions for a nine month

payment option considered as part of

Western’s settlement agreement.

Western states that, its filing proposes

changes to its tariff sheets by issuing

two tariff sheets First Revised Sheet No.

12 and Original Sheet No. 13. Western

further states that the Tariff sheet are

proposed to become effective April 1,

1994.

Western requested a waiver of the

Commission regulation to direct bill

Southern Union Gas Company for

$30,559. This amount is attributable to