alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1





                                     CONSENT



We have issued our reports dated April 7, 2000 accompanying the financial
statements and schedule of Daw Technologies, Inc., included in the Annual Report
of Daw Technologies, Inc., on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999. We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the
Registration Statements of Daw Technologies, Inc., on Forms S-3 (File No.
33-73292 effective January 3, 1994, File No. 33-84224 effective March 20, 1995,
File No. 33-93656 effective June 30, 1995 and file No. 333-05541 effective July
15, 1996) and on Forms S-8 (File No. 33-93206 effective June 7, 1995 and File
No. 333-03930 effective April 23, 1996).



                                                  /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP



Salt Lake City, Utah
April 7, 2000
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-10459

James Hardie Building Products, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 42 (Friday, March 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 11975]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5240]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Advisory Committee for Injury Prevention and Control; Meeting

    In accordance with section 19(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC), announces the following committee meeting.

    Name: Advisory Committee for Injury Prevention and Control 
(ACIPC).
    Times and Dates: 1 p.m.-3:30 p.m., March 20, 1995; 8:30 a.m.-
3:30 p.m., March 21, 1995.
    Place: Holiday Inn at Lenox/Buckhead, 3377 Peachtree Road, NE, 
Atlanta, George 30326.
    Status: Closed 1 p.m.-2 p.m., March 20, and 8:30 a.m.-9 a.m., 
March 21; Open 2 p.m.-3:30 p.m., March 20, and 9 a.m.-3:30 p.m., 
March 21.
    Purpose: The committee will continue to make recommendations on 
policy, strategy, objectives, and priorities including the balance 
and mix of intramural and extramural research; advise on the 
implementation of a national plan for injury prevention and control, 
the development of new technologies and their application; and 
review progress toward injury prevention and control.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will convene in closed 
session from 1 p.m. to 2 p.m. on March 20, 1995. The purpose of this 
closed session is for the Science and Program Review Work Group to 
consider injury control research grant applications recommended for 
further consideration by CDC's Injury Research Grant Review 
Committee. On March 21, 1995, from 8:30 a.m. to 9 a.m., the meeting 
will convene in closed session in order for the full committee to 
vote on a funding recommendation. These portions of the meeting will 
be closed to the public in accordance with provisions set forth in 
section 552b(c) (4) and (6), title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination 
of the Acting Associate Director for Policy Coordination, CDC, 
pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463. Following the closed sessions, the 
committee will discuss (1) programmatic oversight, (2) proposed 
program review, (3) issues concerning NCIPC's extramural research 
grants program, (4) an update from the Director, NCIPC, (5) updates 
on injury issues from other Federal agencies, (6) a report on the 
current and future issues in motor vehicle injury control, and (7) a 
report from the ACIPC Family and Intimate Violence Prevention 
Subcommittee, and issues/activities relating to family and intimate 
violence.
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.
    Contact Person for More Information: Mr. Tom Bartenfield, Acting 
Executive Secretary, ACIPC, NCIPC, Mailstop K-60, CDC, 4770 Buford 
Highway, NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30341-3724, telephone 404/488-4690.

    Dated: February 27, 1995.
William H. Gimson,
Acting Association Director for Policy Coordination, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. 95-5240 Filed 3-2-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-M
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                           METRETEK TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

Southern Flow Companies, Inc., a Delaware corporation

PowerSecure, Inc., a Delaware corporation
   Industrial Automation, Inc., a North Carolina corporation

Metretek, Incorporated, a Florida corporation
   Metretek Europe Limited, a Great Britain company

Marcum Gas Transmission, Inc., a Colorado corporation
   Marcum Capital Resources, Inc., a Colorado corporation
   Conquest Acquisition Company, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company
      Marcum Midstream 1995-2 Business Trust, a Delaware statutory trust (Less
         than majority ownership)

PowerSpring, Inc. a Delaware corporation
   Mercator Energy Incorporated, a Colorado corporation

Marcum Denver, Inc., a Colorado corporation
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 9443]

# AGENCY:

Department of State.

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Department of State published a                         **Federal Register**                         Notice on February 5, 2016, in 81 FR 6324 notifying the public of an Advisory meeting on Online Dispute Resolution being held on Tuesday February 23rd. The notice contained an incorrect day. This document corrects the day.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Tricia Smeltzer, Paralegal, Office of Private International Law, Office of Legal Advisor, Department of State; phone: 202-776-8423, email:                         *smeltzertk@state.gov.*

## Correction

                        In the FR Doc 2016-02304, appearing on page 6324 in the                         **Federal Register**                         of February 5, 2015 (81 FR 6324), in the second column, in the third paragraph, in                         *Time and Place,*                         the first sentence is corrected to read:                    

The meeting of the ACPIL ODR Study Group will take place on Tuesday February 23, from 10 a.m. to 12 noon EST at 2430 E Street NW., South Building (SA 4S) (Navy Hill), Room 240.

Dated: February 9, 2016.

Timothy Schnabel,

Attorney—Adviser, Office of Private International Law, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State,

[FR Doc. 2016-03253 Filed 2-18-16; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 40 (Wednesday, March 1, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 11115]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4924]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Demonstration of Universal Electric 
Transportation Subsystems

    Notice is hereby given that, on December 29, 1994, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301, et seq. (``the Act''), the participants in the 
Demonstration of Universal Electric Transportation Systems (``DUETS'') 
filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General 
and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the 
parties and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to section 6(b) of the 
Act, the identities of the parties and the general area of planned 
activity are: NovaBus of America, Roswell, NM; Honeywell Incorporated, 
Minneapolis, MN; Kaman Electromagnetics Corporation, Hudson, MA; and 
Davis Technologies International, Inc., Dallas, TX.
    The nature and objectives of the research program performed in 
accordance with DUETS is to conduct and exchange technology information 
regarding system engineering that insures regulatory and functional 
requirements of the transit bus market, to design an alternatively-
fueled, hybrid-driven electric propulsion unit, to design a fault 
tolerant, fiber optic vehicle management system, and to develop an 
advanced technology, semi-active suspension system.
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 95-4924 Filed 2-28-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
#### HENRY Z. AUDETTE v. SILVER MICA MINING CORPORATION et al.

(Filed 8 February, 1933.)

Appeal by defendants from *Schenck, J.,*at March Term, 1932, of YANCEY.

Civil action for fraud alleged to have been practiced in the'sale of stock in the Silver Mica Mining Corporation, Incorporated.

Erom a verdict and judgment for plaintiff, the defendants appeal, assigning errors.

*Edward H. McMahan for plaintiff.*

*Charles Hutchins for defendants.*

PER CueiaM.

The controversy on trial narrowed itself to essentially issues of fact, determinable alone by the jury. A careful perusal of the record leaves us with the impression that the case was tried substantially in accord with the decisions and principles applicable. No reversible error has been made to appear. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       8,839,999
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         877,779
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             7,180,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      56,829,411
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        56,028,934
<LOANS>                                    130,536,269
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,887,283
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             217,202,966
<DEPOSITS>                                 171,126,033
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,689,844
<LONG-TERM>                                 22,042,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,498
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,341,591
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             217,202,966
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              6,397,540
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,953,598
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                30,216
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             8,381,354
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           3,172,311
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,769,844
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        4,611,510
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  378,779
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  18
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              4,210,329
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,566,944
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,191,204
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .34
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.88
<LOANS-NON>                                    659,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   389,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,831,241
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  613,000
<RECOVERIES>                                   290,263
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,887,283
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,887,283
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0



</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6414

JOHN FITZGERALD JOHNSON, Petitioner - Appellant,

v. RICHARD E. BAZZLE, Warden, Perry Correctional Institution, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (3:07-cv-03750-PMD)

Submitted: July 10, 2009 Decided: July 20, 2009

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Fitzgerald Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. William Edgar Salter, III, Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: John Fitzgerald Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);

Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Johnson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3821 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3821

Making appropriations to provide emergency assistance for the Community 
Development Fund for disaster response and recovery for the fiscal year 
                       ending September 30, 2022.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 10 (legislative day, March 7), 2022

  Mr. Schatz introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
Making appropriations to provide emergency assistance for the Community 
Development Fund for disaster response and recovery for the fiscal year 
                       ending September 30, 2022.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
     The following sums are appropriated, out of any money in the 
Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 2022, and for other purposes, namely:

              DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

                   Community Planning and Development

                       community development fund

    For an additional amount for ``Community Development Fund'', 
$2,000,000,000, to remain available until expended, which shall be 
allocated and used under the same authority and conditions as the 
additional appropriations for fiscal year 2022 for ``Department of 
Housing and Urban Development--Community Planning and Development--
Community Development Fund'' in title VIII of division B of the 
Extending Government Funding and Delivering Emergency Assistance Act 
(Public Law 117-43):  Provided, That up to $5,000,000 of the amounts 
provided under this heading in this Act may be used for capacity 
building, technical assistance, and necessary costs of administering 
funds under the heading ``Community Development Fund'' in this Act or 
any prior or future Act that makes amounts available for purposes 
related to major disasters under such heading:  Provided further, That, 
after funds are allocated to the most impacted and distressed areas 
resulting from major disasters in 2020 and 2021, remaining amounts may 
be used for 2022 disasters under such same authority and conditions:  
Provided further, That such amount is designated by the Congress as 
being for an emergency requirement pursuant to section 4001(a)(1) and 
section 4001(b) of S. Con. Res. 14 (117th Congress), the concurrent 
resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2022.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 6 (Tuesday, January 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2613-2614]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-479]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decrees In United States v. Nalco 
Chemical Company, et al., Under the Comprehensive Environmental 
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

    Notice is hereby given that two proposed Consent Decrees in United 
States v. Nalco Chemical Company, et al., Case No. 91-C-4482 (N.D. 
Ill.), entered into by the United States on behalf of U.S. EPA and 
fifteen settling parties were lodged on December 22, 1994 with the 
United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The 
proposed Consent Decrees resolve certain claims of the United States 
against the settling parties under the Comprehensive Environmental 
Response Compensation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. Secs. 9601 et seq. 
relating to the Byron Superfund Site in Ogle County, Illinois, Under 
the First de minimis Consent Decree, nine settling parties among the 
``drum'' parties in the case will pay the United States $94,405.86. 
Under the second de minimis Consent Decree, six settling parties among 
the ``IPC customer'' parties in the case will pay the United States 
$429,045.17.
    The Department of Justice will receive comments relating to the 
proposed Consent Decrees for 30 days following the publication of this 
Notice. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General 
of the Environment and Natural Resources Division, Department of 
Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and should refer to United States v. 
Nalco Chemical Company, et al., D.J. Ref. No. 90-11-3-687. The proposed 
Consent Decrees may [[Page 2614]] be examined at the Office of the 
United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, 219 S. 
Dearborn St., Chicago, Illinois 60604; the Region v Office of the 
United States Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Street, 
Chicago, Illinois 60604; and at the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G 
Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005 (202-624-0892). A copy 
of the proposed Consent Decrees may be obtained in person or by mail 
from the consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, 
Washington, D.C. 20005. In requesting a copy of the first Consent 
Decree (the ``Drum'' Decree), please enclose a check in the amount of 
$7.00 (25 cents per page for reproduction costs), payable to the 
Consent Decree Library. In requesting a copy of the second Consent 
Decree (the ``IPC Customer'' Decree), please enclose a check in the 
amount of $6.25 (25 cents per page for reproduction costs), payable to 
the Consent Decree Library. In requesting a copy of both Consent 
Decrees, please enclose a check in the amount of $13.25 (25 cents per 
page for reproduction costs), payable to the Consent Decree Library.
Bruce S. Gelber,
Acting Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment 
and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 95-479 Filed 1-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M