Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 10, 1995 / Notices 2583

its FERC Gas Tariff, Seventh Revised

Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets

to reflect a change in its FT/FT–NN GSR

Surcharge and its Interruptible

Transportation Rates due to an increase

in the FERC interest rate effective

January 1, 1995:

First Sub. First Alt. Fifteenth Revised Sheet

No. 15

First Sub. First Alt. Fifteenth Revised Sheet

No. 17

First Sub. First Alt. Ninth Revised Sheet No.

18

Southern states that copies of the

filing were served upon Southern’s

intervening customers and interested

state commissions.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest said filing should file a motion

to intervene or protest with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 825

North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington,

D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules

211 and 214 of the Commission’s Rules

of Practice and Procedure. All such

motions or protests should be filed on

or before January 11, 1995. Protests will

be considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of Southern’s filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–504 Filed 1–9–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. SA95–2–000]

Southern California Gas Company;

Notice of Petition for Adjustment

January 4, 1995.

Take notice that on December 21,

1994, Southern California Gas Company

(SoCal), filed pursuant to Section 502(c)

of the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978

(NGPA), a petition for adjustment from

Section 284.123(b)(1)(ii) of the

Commission’s Regulations to permit

SoCal to use its tariff on file with the

Public Utilities Commission of the State

of California (CPUC), for hub (parking,

loaning, and wheeling) services

performed pursuant to NGPA Section

311.

In support of its petition, SoCal states

that it is a local distribution company

operating in the State of California, and

is a gas utility subject to the jurisdiction

of the CPUC. SoCal’s transportation and

storage rates are subject to regulation by

the CPUC. SoCal anticipates providing

Section 311 hub services on behalf of

interstate pipeline companies or local

distribution companies served by

interstate pipeline companies for a

charge not to exceed the rates on file

with the TRC, as follows:

Hub Loaning: $0.6922 per Dth per transaction

Hub Parking: $0.6922 per Dth per transaction

Hub Wheeling: $0.7414 per Dth per

transaction

The regulations applicable to this

proceeding are found in Subpart K of

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure. Any person desiring to

participate in this rate proceeding must

file a motion to intervene in accordance

with Sections 385.211 and 385.214 of

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedures. All motions must be filed

with the Secretary of the Commission

within 15 days after publication of this

notice in the Federal Register. The

petition for adjustment is on file with

the Commission and is available for

public inspection.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–511 Filed 1–9–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. RP94–187–004]

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company;

Notice of Compliance Filing

January 4, 1995.

Take notice that on December 29,

1994, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company

(Tennessee), filed Third Sub Original

Sheet No. 22A for a proposed effective

date of August 22, 1994, and Sub First

Revised Sheet No. 22A and Second Sub

First Revised Sheet No. 22A for a

proposed effective date of November 1,

1994.

Tennessee states that the revised tariff

sheets are in compliance with a

December 8, 1994 Letter Order, issued

pursuant to § 375.307(b)(1) and (b)(3) by

OPR—Rate Analysis Branch I in Docket

No. RP94–187–003. The Letter Order

directed Tennessee to file revised tariff

sheets to effect a correction to the

language in footnote 1 of the tariff

sheets.

Tennessee states that copies of the

filing have been mailed to all of its

jurisdictional customers and affected

state regulatory commissions.

Any person desiring to protest with

reference to said filing should file a

protest with the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission, 825 North

Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.

20426, in accordance with Section 211

of the Commission’s Rules of Practice

and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211. All

such protests should be filed on or

before January 11, 1995. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to this proceeding.

Copies of this filing are on file and

available for public inspection.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–494 Filed 1–9–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. CP95–125–000]

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company;

Notice of Request Under Blanket

Authorization

January 4, 1995.

Take notice that on December 21,

1994, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company

(Tennessee), P.O. Box 2511, Houston,

Texas 77252, filed in Docket No. CP95–

125–000, a request pursuant to Sections

157.205 and 157.212 of the

Commission’s Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205 and

157.212) for authorization to establish a

delivery point by reversing an existing

receipt meter for its existing customer,

Mississippi Valley Gas Company

(Mississippi Valley), under Tennessee’s

blanket certificate issued to Tennessee

in Docket No. CP82–413–000 pursuant

to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all

as more fully set forth in the request that

is on file with the Commission and open

to public inspection.

Tennessee proposes to reverse its

check valve located in Lowndes County,

Mississippi and install electronic gas

measurement (E.G.M.). Mississippi

Valley proposes to reverse its existing

Meter No. 1–1758 into a delivery

facility. Tennessee will install, own,

operate and maintain the E.G.M. and

will operate the measurement facilities.

Mississippi Valley will own and

maintain the measurement facilities.

The estimated cost for the project is

$20,100, 100% reimbursible to

Tennessee.

Tennessee states that the total

quantities to be delivered for

Mississippi Valley will not exceed the

total quantities authorized. Tennessee

asserts that the establishment of the

proposed delivery meter is not

prohibited by Tennessee’s tariff and that

it has sufficient capacity to accomplish

the deliveries at the proposed new

delivery meter without detriment or

disadvantage to any of Tennessee’s

other customers.

Any person or the Commission’s staff

may, within 45 days after issuance of

the instant notice by the Commission,

file pursuant to Rule 214 of the

Commission’s Procedural Rules (18 CFR