alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                  OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                    0
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        33,634
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                           4,779
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     54,932
<PP&E>                                                9,324
<DEPRECIATION>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      248,035
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                48,269
<BONDS>                                             170,180
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                33,816
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                  4
<OTHER-SE>                                          (38,803)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        248,035
<SALES>                                              53,443
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    171,316
<CGS>                                                39,385
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       102,949
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     78,392
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   14,265
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (23,403)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         (6,138)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (17,265)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (17,265)
<EPS-BASIC>                                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 37 (Friday, February 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10348-10349]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4573]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Products Laboratory Wood Utilization Research

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, Wisconsin, will host 
a meeting March 27-30, 1995, to brief industry and the public on Forest 
Service programs in wood utilization research. The Forest Service will 
be presenting the status and description of pending research 
initiatives and programs. Advice and recommendations to the Forest 
Service will not be solicited or accepted during the meeting; rather, 
input as a result of reviews may be submitted in writing after the 
meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held March 27-30, from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. (M-
Tu); 8 a.m. to 3 p.m. (W); 8 a.m. to 10 a.m. (Th).

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Forest Products Laboratory, 
One Gifford Pinchot Drive, Madison, Wisconsin. [[Page 10349]] 
    Send written comments to Diann L. Campbell, Meeting Coordinator, 
Forest Products Laboratory, One Gifford Pinchot Drive, Madison, WI 
53705-2398.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diann Campbell, telephone: (608) 231-
9244.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Forest Service conducts major research 
in the area of wood utilization at its Forest Experiment Stations and 
in Madison at the Forest Products Laboratory. Current research programs 
focus on: Wood properties, engineering, and improved design procedures; 
softwood and hardwood lumber; construction technologies; wood drying, 
processing, preservation, and finishing; adhesives; composites and 
panels. Forest Service scientists will provide presentations on 
research at the forefront of wood manufacturing and utilization 
technology. Members of the American Forest & Paper Association, 
Committee on Research and Evaluation (AF&PA-CORE) will chair panel 
discussions on nine selected topics related to wood utilization.

    Dated: February 17, 1995.
Kenneth R. Peterson,
Deputy Director.
[FR Doc. 95-4573 Filed 2-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 41 (Thursday, March 2, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 11678]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5082]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement


Information Collection Submitted to the Office of Management and 
Budget for Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act

    The proposal for the collection of information listed below has 
been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for approval 
under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 
35). Copies of the proposed collection of information and related forms 
may be obtained by contacting the Bureau's clearance officer at the 
phone number listed below. Comments and suggestions on the requirements 
should be made directly to the bureau clearance officer and to the 
Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (1029-
0087), Washington, DC 20503, telephone 202-395-7340.

Title: Abandoned Mine Land Problem Area Description Form
OMB approval number: 1029-0087
Abstract: This form will be used to update the Office of Surface Mining 
Reclamation and Enforcement's inventory of abandoned mine lands. From 
this inventory, the most serious problem areas are selected for 
reclamation through the apportionment of funds to States and Indian 
tribes.
Bureau Form Number: OSM-76
Frequency: On occasion
Description of respondents: State Governments and Indian Tribes
Estimated completion time: 3 hours
Annual responses: 1,800
Annual burden hours: 4,800
Bureau clearance officer: John A. Trelease, 202-343-1475.

    Dated: December 6, 1994.
Andrew F. DeVito,
Chief, Branch of Environmental and Economic Analysis.
[FR Doc. 95-5082 Filed 3-1-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-M
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Industrial Enterprises
      of
      America, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to
      such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for
      the quarter ended December 31. 2006 (the “Form 10-QSB”) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the
      Form
      10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the period presented in
      the
      Form 10-QSB.





Dated: **February
      15, 2007**


/s/
      John D. Mazzuto


**John
      D. Mazzuto**


Chief
      Financial Officer














The
      foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350 and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate
      disclosure document.
EXHIBIT 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Premiere Global Services, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") Nos. 333-17593,
333-29787, 333-39693, 333-52357, 333-79599, 333-87635, 333-89891, 333-51380,
333-57698, 333-67292, 333-101262, and 333-116506 on Form S-8 of our reports
relating to the consolidated financial statements of the Company and
management's report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting dated March 15, 2006, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
March 15, 2006
#### *W.*B. BYERLY v. GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION.

(Filed 7 November, 1928.)

Judgments by Default Pinal — When May be Rendered.

A judgment by default final is irregularly entered upon a pleading that does not allege a sum certain or computable, due upon contract, express or implied. C. S., 595.

*257Appeal by plaintiff from *Stacie, J.,*at May Term, 1928, of Guileoed.

Affirmed.

*L. B. Williams, Gold & York and Z. I. Walser for plaintiff.*

*Shuping & Hampton for defendant.*

Pee CueiaM.

This was a motion made by defendant to set aside a judgment by default final. From a careful perusal of the record, we do not think the allegations of the complaint allege breaches of express or implied contracts for sums certain or computable; nor did the complaint allege a promise to pay the total amount sued for. C. S., 595.

The judgment by default final was irregular; the court below found as a fact that defendant had a meritorious defense. See *Supply Co. v. Plumbing Co.,*195 N. C., 629. The judgment of the court below is

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. EL16-32-000]

                    On February 5, 2016, the Commission issued an order in Docket No. EL16-32-000, pursuant to section 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 16 U.S.C. 824e (2012), instituting an investigation into the justness and reasonableness of Talen Energy Marketing, LLC's informational filing pursuant to Schedule 2 to the PJM Interconnection, LLC's Open Access Transmission Tariff supporting the revenue requirement for reactive supply and voltage control service (Reactive Service) of Talen Ironwood, LLC.                     *Talen Energy Marketing, LLC,*                     154 FERC ¶ 61,087 (2016).                

                    The refund effective date in Docket No. EL16-32-000, established pursuant to section 206(b) of the FPA, will be the date of publication of this notice in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: February 5, 2016.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2016-02759 Filed 2-10-16; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 40 (Wednesday, March 1, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11115-11116]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4934]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Application

    Pursuant to Sec. 1301.43(a) of title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on January 24, 1995, Organix 
Inc., 65 Cummings Park, Woburn, Massachusetts 01801, made application 
to the Drug Enforcement [[Page 11116]] Administration (DEA) for 
registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled 
substances listed below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                           Drug                               Schedule  
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tetrahydrocannabinols (7370)..............................  I           
Morphine (9300)...........................................  II          
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The firm plans to manufacture Tetrahydrocannabinols and a 
derivative of Morphine for use in diagnostic kits.
    Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered 
with DEA to manufacture such substances may file comments or objections 
to the issuance of the above application and may also file a written 
request for a hearing thereon in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.54 and in 
the form prescribed by 21 CFR 1316.47.
    Any such comments, objections, or requests for a hearing may be 
addressed to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion 
Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of 
Justice, Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register 
Representative (CCR), and must be filed no later than March 31, 1995.

    Dated: February 17, 1995.
Gene R. Haislip,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 95-4934 Filed 2-28-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 28, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 10861]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4863]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Dkt. C-3550]


Bee-Sweet, Inc., et al.; Prohibited Trade Practices, and 
Affirmative Corrective Actions

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Consent order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In settlement of alleged violations of federal law prohibiting 
unfair acts and practices and unfair methods of competition, this 
consent order prohibits, among other things, a North Carolina 
corporation and its officer from representing that bee pollen products 
are effective as a cure or in mitigating certain conditions and 
physical ailments, and from misrepresenting the existence, contents, 
validity, results, conclusions, or interpretations of any test or 
study. In addition, the consent order requires the respondents to 
notify all sellers of the products, for the last 12 months, about the 
settlement with the Commission.

DATES: Complaint and Order issued January 17, 1995.\1\

    \1\Copies of the Complaint and the Decision and Order are 
available from the Commission's Public Reference Branch, H-130, 6th 
Street & Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20580.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ronald Waldman, FTC/New York Regional, 150 William St., Suite 1300, New 
York, NY 10038. (212) 264-1207.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On Tuesday, November 8, 1994, there was 
published in the Federal Register, 59 FR 55665, a proposed consent 
agreement with analysis In the Matter of Bee-Sweet, Inc., et al., for 
the purpose of soliciting public comment. Interested parties were given 
sixty (60) days in which to submit comments, suggestions or objections 
regarding the proposed form of the order.
    No comments having been received, the Commission has ordered the 
issuance of the complaint in the form contemplated by the agreement, 
made its jurisdictional findings and entered an order to cease and 
desist, as set forth in the proposed consent agreement, in disposition 
of this proceeding.

(Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interprets or applies sec. 5, 
38 Stat. 719, as amended; 15 U.S.C. 45, 52)
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-4863 Filed 2-27-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
#### STATE v. JOHN HENRY BREEZE.

(Filed 10 December, 1947.)

Criminal Law § 80b (4) —

Where defendant fails to serve his case on appeal within the time allowed, no extension of time having been allowed, the motion of the Attorney-General to docket and dismiss will be granted, *but where the*defendant stands convicted of a capital felony this will be done only after examination of the record proper fails to disclose error.

Appeal by defendant from *Hamilton, Special Judge,*at March Term, 1947, of OraNge.

Criminal prosecution tried upon indictment charging the defendant with the murder of one Agnes Wilkerson.

*Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Atiomeys-General Bruton, Rhodes, and Moody for the State.*

*No counsel for the defendant, appellant.*

Per Curiam.

The defendant was' convicted of murder in the first degree. Sentence of death by asphyxiation was imposed. Notice of appeal was given but the appeal has not been perfected. The time allowed for serving case on appeal has expired and no extension of the time for serving such case has been granted.

The Attorney-General moves to docket and dismiss the appeal. The motion will be allowed, but, according to the rule of the Court in capital cases, we have examined the record to see if any error appears. No error is disclosed by the record. *S. v. Watson,*208 N. C., 70, 179 S. E., 455.

Judgment affirmed.

Appeal dismissed.
#### JOHN E. STAPLES, by His Next Friend, MRS. E. P. WHITAKER, v. G. D. BRUNS.

(Filed 20 November, 1940.)

Appeal by defendant from *Johnston, Special Judge,*at September Extra Term, 1940, of Mecklenburg.

Reversed.

Civil action to recover damages for personal injuries.

G. D. Bruns, Jr., infant son of defendant, while riding a bicycle belonging to bim on a sidewalk in the city of Charlotte, in violation of a city ordinance, struck and injured plaintiff.

Defendant demurred to the complaint. The demurrer was overruled and defendant excepted and appealed.

*G. T. Carswell and Joe W. Ervin for plaintiff, appellee.*

*John Newit.i for defendant, appellant.*

*781Pee. . CueiaM.

Tbe allegations contained in tbe complaint are not sufficient to take plaintiff’s cause of action out of tbe general rule tbat a parent is not liable for tbe torts of bis minor child. *Bowen v. Mewborn, ante,*423, is in point and is controlling. As tbe complaint fails to state a cause of action tbe judgment below overruling tbe demurrer is

Eeversed.
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND , TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Manuel Santiago

- Negron a / k / a * From the 35 th District Court Juan Manuel Santiago

- Negron of Brown County,

a / k / a Juan Negron

- Santiago, Jr., Trial Court No. CR2744 1

.

Vs. No. 11

- 2 2

- 00 31 4

- CR * April 4

, 202 4

The State of Texas

, * Memorand um Opinion by Bailey, C.J. (P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,
Trotter , J. , and W illiams, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opi nion,
the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO\
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Online Vacation Center Holdings Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Edward B. Rudner, Principal Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Date: November 6, 2008


/s/ Edward B. Rudner
--------------------
Edward B. Rudner
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Mark N. Schwartz, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Hypertension Diagnostics, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  November 14, 2006

/s/ Mark N. SchwartzMark N. Schwartz
Chief Executive Officer