alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 42 (Friday, March 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 11966]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5227]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. PR94-16-000]


Southern California Gas Co.; Informal Settlement Conference

February 27, 1995.
    Take notice that an informal settlement conference in the above-
captioned proceeding will be held on Friday, March 10, 1995 at 10:00 
a.m. in a room to be designated at the offices of the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    Attendance will be limited to the parties and participants, as 
defined by 18 CFR 385.102 (b) and (c). Persons wishing to become a 
party must move to intervene and receive intervenor status pursuant to 
Sec. 385.214 of the Commission's regulations.
    For additional information, please contact Mark E. Hegerle at (202) 
208-0287.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-5226 Filed 3-2-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP91-203-000, et al. (Phase II)]
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.; Informal Settlement Conference
February 27, 1995.
    Take notice that an informal settlement conference will be convened 
in this proceeding on Tuesday, March 14, 1995, at 10:00 a.m., at the 
offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 810 First Street, 
NE., Washington, DC, for the purpose of exploring the possible 
settlement of the above-referenced docket.
    Any party, as defined by 18 CFR 385.102(c), or any participant as 
defined in 18 CFR 385.102(b), is invited to attend. Persons wishing to 
become a party must move to intervene and receive intervenor status 
pursuant to the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 385.214).
    For additional information, please contact Dennis H. Melvin (202) 
208-0042 Donald Williams (202) 208-0743.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-5227 Filed 3-2-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 13, 2019

No. 04-19-00765-CR

IN RE Alula F. HAGOS

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

On October 29, 2019, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering the 

petition, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition 

for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

It is so ORDERED on November 13, 2019.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 13th day of November, 2019.

_____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2019-CR-9097, styled The State of Texas v. Alula F. Hagos, pending in the 

226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Velia J. Meza presiding.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 7, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12581-12582]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5489]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET

Office of Federal Financial Management


Proposed Rescission of OMB Circular A-73

AGENCY: Office of Management and Budget, Office of Federal Financial 
Management.

ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rescission of OMB Circular A-73.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Publication of OMB's intention to rescind Circular A-73.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Suzanne Murrin, OMB, Office of Federal 
Financial Management, (202) 395-6911.

    Dated: February 28, 1995.
John B. Arthur,
Associate Director for Administration.

Office of Management and Budget

Rescission of OMB Circulars

AGENCY: Office of Management and Budget.

ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rescission of OMB Circular A-73.

----------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 12582]] 


SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that OMB intends to rescind Circular 
No. A-73, Audit of Federal Operations and Programs. The current 
circular codifies what are now common audit practices throughout the 
Federal Government and extends the application of certain principles in 
the Inspector General Act of 1978 (IG Act) to those agencies not 
covered by the IG Act. Circular No. A-73 is unnecessary because: (1) 
Its audit policy direction is largely hortatory and (2) the IG Act has 
been expanded in 1988 amendments to cover almost all Federal entities 
of significant size.

DATES: Persons who wish to comment on the proposed rescission of 
Circular No. A-73 should submit their comments no later than April 7, 
1995. The rescission will take place May 22, 1995, unless the comments 
raise significant concerns regarding the proposed rescission.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to: Suzanne Murrin, Office of 
Federal Financial Management, Office of Management and Budget, New 
Executive Office Building, 725 17th Street, NW, Room 6025, Washington, 
DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information on the 
proposed rescission of Circular No. A-73, contact Suzanne Murrin on 
(202) 395-6911. For further information on OMB's overall review of its 
circulars, contact Frank J. Seidl, III, Staff Assistant, on (202) 395-
5146; or Rosalyn J. Rettman, Associate General Counsel for Budget on 
(202) 395-5600.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Director of the Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) has initiated a systematic review of all OMB circulars, as 
part of efforts to reduce unnecessary Government directives. As part of 
this initiative, each OMB circular is being reviewed to see whether it 
should be rescinded or whether its requirements can be simplified.

[FR Doc. 95-5489 Filed 3-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3110-01-M
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

INTERSTATE HOTELS & RESORTS,
INC.

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906
CERTIFICATIONS


In connection with this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q of Interstate Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(the Registrant) for the three months ended
September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, J. William Richardson, Chief
Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |    |                                                                                                                                                                
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements
    of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and                                  
|
| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Registrant.



| |                          
| | -------------------------
| | /s/ J. WILLIAM RICHARDSON
| |                          
| | J. William Richardson    
| | Chief Financial Officer  

Dated: November 8, 2004

43
#### COIN MACHINE ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. SAM PILLMAN, Defendant.

(Filed 19 March, 1952.)

Appeal by defendant from *Halstead, Special Judge,*October Term, 1951, of HERTFORD.

*J ones •& J ones and J ohn R. J enkins, Jr., for defendant, appellant.*

*J oseph D. Blythe, W. D. Boone, and Stuart*A. *Curtis for plaintiff, appellee.*

Per Curiam.

This is an action instituted by the plaintiff to recover of the defendant the sum of $10,449.32 with interest from 13 March, 1948, until paid.

The claim is based upon a conditional sales contract executed by the defendant to the Pioneer Distributing Company and assigned to the plaintiff, presenting a factual situation similar to that set forth in *Acceptance Corp. v. Pillman, ante,*295. This appeal involves the same legal questions presented and disposed of in that case. For the reasons stated therein, the defendant will be granted a new trial in this action.

New trial.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 11


                          BIOTRANSPLANT INCORPORATED


<TABLE>
                    COMPUTATION OF PRO FORMA NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE (1)

<CAPTION>
                                                                            YEARS ENDED
                                                                            DECEMBER 31,
                                                                        1995             1996
                                                                    -----------      -----------
<S>                                                                 <C>              <C>
Net Loss.........................................................   $(2,087,239)     $(6,037,108)
                                                                    ===========      ===========
Shares Used in Computing Pro Forma Net Loss Per Common Share:
  Weighted Average Common Stock Outstanding During the Period....       124,373        7,153,609
  Comversion of Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock (2).......     3,896,580            --
Dilutive Effect of Common Equivalent Shares Issued Subsequent 
  to March 1, 1995(3)............................................       676,048          236,432
                                                                    -----------      -----------
                                                                      4,697,001        7,390,041
                                                                    -----------      -----------
Pro Forma Net Loss Per Common Share..............................   $     (0.44)     $     (0.82)
<FN>
---------------------------------
(1) Historical net loss per common share has not been separately presented, as
    the amounts would not be meaningfull.

(2) Efective with the closing of the Company's initial public offering of common
    stock, all shares of redeemable convertible preferred stock automatically
    converted into shares of common stock. Accordingly the equivalent number of
    weighted average common shares that would have been outstanding during each
    period presented have been included as outstanding.

(3) Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin 
    No. 83, common stock, preferred stock, stock options and warrants issued at
    prices below the initial public offering price per share ("cheap stock") 
    during the twelve month period immediately preceding the filing date of
    the Company's Registration Statement for its initial public offering have
    been included as outstanding for all periods presented.  The dilutive effect
    of the common and common stock equivalents was computed in accordance with
    the treasury stock method.
</FN>

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


                  <ARTICLE>                 5
<LEGEND>
                  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
                  from MW Medical,  Inc. June 30, 1999 financial  statements and
                  is qualified  in its  entirety by reference to such  financial
                  statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                               0001059577
<NAME>                              MW Medical, Inc.



<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-1999

<CASH>                                           918,002
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    321,560
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (60,000)
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,193,820
<PP&E>                                           1,154,752
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (236,584)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,188,823
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,091,434
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         16,724
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,080,665
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,188,823
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 784,852
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,963
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (775,175)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (775,975)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (775,975)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)



</TABLE>
#### CHARLES M. IVEY, JR., Administrator of the Estate of JOHN W. HADNOT v. CLYDE T. ROLLINS, Administrator of the Estate of LUKE R. HADNOT, JR.

(Filed 2 December, 1959.)

1. Appeal and Error § 53—

A petition to rebear addressed solely to itbe question wbicb was argued and fully considered by tbe court on the former bearing will be dismissed.

PetitioN by Charles M. Ivey, Jr., administrator of the estate of John W. Hadnot, to rehear this case, reported in 250 N.C. 89, 108 S. E. 2d 63.

*McLendon, Brim, Holderness & Brooks; L. P. McLendon, Jr.; C. T. Leonard, Jr. for petitioner.*

*Smith, Moore, Smith, Schell & Hunter for respondent.*

PbR CüRIAm.

A petition to rehear was submitted to the Court in Conference by the Justices to whom it was referred. *Greene v. Lyles,*187 N.C. 598, 122 S.E. 297.

■ The petition to rehear is based on the failure of the Court to apply the doctrine of *res ipsa loquitor*to the facts in the case. No other question is raised.

Under our decisions, the doctrine of *res ipsa loquitor*is not applicable in this case. *Lane v. Bryan,*246 N.C. 108, 97 S.E. 2d 411; *Pemberton v. Lewis,*235 N.C. 188, 69 S.E. 2d 512; *Etheridge v. Etheridge,*222 N.C. 616, 24 S.E. 2d 477; *Springs v. Doll,*197 N.C. 240, 148 S.E, 251.

“Generally, a defendant’s negligence will not be presumed from the *346mere happening of an accident, but, on the contrary, in .the absence of evidence on the question, freedom from negligence will be presumed.” *Etheridge v. Etheridge, supra; Williamson v. Randall,*248 N.C. 20, 102 S.E. 2d 381.

The question as to whether or not the doctrine of *res ipsa loquitor*applied to the facts in this case having been argued by counsel for the appellant and fully considered by the Court on the former hearing, the Court will not disturb its judgment. *Weston v. Lumber Co.,*168 N.C. 98, 83 S.E. 693.

The petition to rehear is therefore dismissed.

Petition dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 41 (Thursday, March 2, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11695-11696]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5159]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

THRIFT DEPOSITOR PROTECTION OVERSIGHT BOARD


Regional Advisory Board Meetings

AGENCY: Thrift Depositor Protection Oversight Board.

ACTION: Notice of meeting locations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is to announce the meeting location for Region 2 and a 
change of meeting location for Region 1 of the Series 20 Regional 
Advisory Board meetings scheduled from March 2 through April 7 as 
published in the Federal Register, February 22, 1995, page 9885.

DATES: The meetings are scheduled as follows:
    1. March 22, 9 a.m. to 12:30 p.m., Charlotte, North Carolina, 
Region 2 Advisory Board.
    2. March 24, 9 a.m. to 12:30 p.m., Boston, Massachusetts, Region 1 
Advisory Board.

ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held at the following locations:
    1. Charlotte, North Carolina--Charlotte Mecklenburg Government 
Center, 600 East 4th Street.
    2. Boston, Massachusetts--Sheraton Boston, 39 Dalton 
Street. [[Page 11696]] 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jill Nevius, Committee Management Officer, Thrift Depositor Protection 
Oversight Board, 808 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20232, 202/416-
2626.
    Dated: February 27, 1995.
Jill Nevius,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-5159 Filed 3-1-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2221-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     2000 Textainer Equipment Income Fund IV
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000882288
<NAME>                        Textainer Equipment Income Fund IV, LP
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         3,183
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4,659
<ALLOWANCES>                                   323
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               17
<PP&E>                                         113,631
<DEPRECIATION>                                 50,184
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 70,983
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,195
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     67,788
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   70,983
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               17,525
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  14,564
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (221)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3,182
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,182
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0




</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 10.1

                                  AGREEMENT

         THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into as of this 5th day of June,
2002 by and among Forever Network, Inc., a Missouri corporation ("Forever")
and Brent D. Cassity ("Cassity").

         WHEREAS, Cassity entered into a certain Agreement Not to Compete (a
"Non-Compete") with SCI dated February 23, 1996 whereby SCI made certain
monthly payments to Cassity,

         WHEREAS, Forever purchased the assets of the Pfitzinger Funeral
Home, Kirkwood, Missouri from SCI Missouri Funeral Services, Inc. ("SCI")
pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement of even date herewith ("Asset
Purchase Agreement"); and

         WHEREAS, a material part of the consideration paid to SCI under the
Asset Purchase Agreement, was the release by Cassity of SCI's continuing
financial obligations under the Non-Compete.

         NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto have agreed as follows:

         1.   In consideration of Cassity's release of SCI under the
Non-Compete Agreement, Forever agrees to pay to Cassity the remaining
monthly payments as and when such payments would have been due to Cassity
under the terms of the Non-Compete Agreement, commencing with the June 23,
2002 monthly payment of $4,944.44 and equal payments on the 23rd day of each
month thereafter until the last monthly payment is made on February 23,
2006.

         2.   This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts
each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but which together shall
constitute the same instrument.

         3.   This Agreement is governed by the laws of the State of
Missouri.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement
on the day and year first above written.


                                            FOREVER NETWORK, INC.

                                      By:   /s/ Nekol Province
                                            --------------------------------
                                      Its:  Vice President
                                            --------------------------------

                                                           "Forever"


                                            /s/ Brent D. Cassity
                                            --------------------------------
                                            Brent D. Cassity

                                                           "Cassity"
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 23.0





                              ACCOUNTANT'S CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 of HF Financial Corp., pertaining to the HF Financial Corp. 1991 Stock
Option and Incentive Plan and the 1996 Director Restricted Stock Plan, of our
report dated August 18, 1999, accompanying the consolidated financial
statements included in the Form 10-K Annual Report of HF Financial Corp. for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 1999.




                                            /s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP

                                            McGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP


Sioux Falls, South Dakota
September 27, 1999







                                       1
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Unify Corporation (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Todd E. Wille, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), that, to the best of my knowledge:

July 21,
2004

| |  | /s/TODD E. WILLETodd E. Wille
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

---



QuickLinks