9398 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 33 / Friday, February 17, 1995 / Notices

1A stay will be issued routinely by the

Commission in those proceedings where an

informed decision on environmental issues

(whether raised by a party or by the Commission’s

Section of Environmental Analysis in its

independent investigation) cannot be made prior to

the effective date of the notice of exemption. See

Exemption of Out-of-Service Rail Lines, 5 I.C.C.2d

377 (1989). Any entity seeking a stay on

environmental concerns is encouraged to file its

request as soon as possible in order to permit this

Commission to review and act on the request before

the effective date of this exemption.

2See Exempt. of Rail Abandonment—Offers of

Finan. Assist., 4 I.C.C.2d 164 (1987).

3The Commission will accept a late-filed trail use

request as long as it retains jurisdiction to do so.

and historic preservation matters must

be filed within 15 days after the EA

becomes available to the public.

Environmental, historic preservation,

public use, or trail use/rail banking

conditions will be imposed, where

appropriate, in a subsequent decision.

Decided: February 10, 1995.

By the Commission,

David M. Konschnik,

Director, Office of Proceedings.

Vernon A. Williams,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–4032 Filed 2–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7035–01–P

[Docket No. AB–3 (Sub-No. 120X]

Missouri Pacific Railroad Company—

Abandonment Exemption—in Cowley

County, KS (Winfield Industrial Lead)

Missouri Pacific Railroad Company

(MP) has filed a notice of exemption

under 49 CFR 1152 Subpart F—Exempt

Abandonments to abandon a portion of

its railroad, known as the Winfield

Industrial Lead, from milepost 513.50

(at the end of the line) to milepost

514.41, near Winfield, a distance of

approximately 0.91 mile, in Cowley

County, KS.

MP has certified that: (1) No local

traffic has moved over the line for at

least 2 years; (2) no overhead traffic has

moved over the line; (3) no formal

complaint filed by a user of rail service

on the line (or by a State or local

government entity acting on behalf of

such user) regarding cessation of service

over the line either is pending with the

Commission or with any U.S. District

Court or has been decided in favor of

the complainant within the 2-year

period; and (4) the requirements at 49

CFR 1105.7 (environmental reports), 49

CFR 1105.8 (historic reports), 49 CFR

1105.11 (transmittal letter), 49 CFR

1105.12 (newspaper publication), and

49 CFR 1152.50(d)(1) (notice to

governmental agencies) have been met.

As a condition to use of this

exemption, any employee adversely

affected by the abandonment shall be

protected under Oregon Short Line R.

Co.—Abandonment—Goshen, 360 I.C.C.

91 (1979). To address whether this

condition adequately protects affected

employees, a petition for partial

revocation under 49 U.S.C. 10505(d)

must be filed.

Provided no formal expression of

intent to file an offer of financial

assistance (OFA) has been received, this

exemption will be effective on March

19, 1995, unless stayed pending

reconsideration. Petitions to stay that do

not involve environmental issues,1

formal expressions of intent to file an

OFA under 49 CFR 1152.27(c)(2),2 and

trail use/rail banking requests under 49

CFR 1152.29 3 must be filed by February

27, 1995. Petitions to reopen or requests

for public use conditions under 49 CFR

1152.28 must be filed by March 9, 1995,

with: Office of the Secretary, Case

Control Branch, Interstate Commerce

Commission, Washington, DC 20423.

A copy of any pleading filed with the

Commission should be sent to

applicant’s representative: Joseph D.

Anthofer, 1416 Dodge St., Room 830,

Omaha, NE 68179.

If the notice of exemption contains

false or misleading information, the

exemption is void ab initio.

MP has filed an environmental report

which addresses the abandonment’s

effects, if any, on the environmental and

historic resources. The Section of

Environmental Analysis (SEA) will

issue an environmental assessment (EA)

by February 22, 1995. Interested persons

may obtain a copy of the EA by writing

to SEA (Room 3219, Interstate

Commerce Commission, Washington,

DC 20423) or by calling Elaine Kaiser,

Chief of SEA, at (202) 927–6248.

Comments on environmental and

historic preservation matters must be

filed within 15 days after the EA is

available to the public.

Environmental, historic preservation,

public use, or trail use/rail banking

conditions will be imposed, where

appropriate, in a subsequent decision.

Decided: February 13, 1995.

By the Commission, David M. Konschnik,

Director, Office of Proceedings.

Vernon A. Williams,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–4030 Filed 2–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7035–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Information Collections Under Review

The Office of Management and Budget

(OMB) has been sent the following

collection(s) of information proposals

for review under the provisions of the

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 USC

Chapter 35) and the Paperwork

Reduction Reauthorization Act since the

last list was published. Entries are

grouped into submission categories,

with each entry containing the

following information:

(1) The title of the form/collection;

(2) The agency form number, if any,

and the applicable component of the

Department sponsoring the collection.

(3) Who will be asked or required to

respond, as well as a brief abstract;

(4) An estimate of the total number of

respondents and the amount of time

estimated for an average respondent to

respond;

(5) An estimate of the total public

burden (in hours) associated with the

collection; and,

(6) An indication as to whether

Section 3504(h) of Public Law 96–511

applies.

Comments and/or suggestions

regarding the item(s) contained in this

notice, especially regarding the

estimated public burden and associated

respond time, should be directed to the

OMB reviewer, Mr. Jeff Hill on (202)

395–7340 and to the Department of

Justice’s Clearance Officer, Mr. Robert B.

Briggs, on (202) 514–4319. If you

anticipate commenting on a form/

collection, but find that time to prepare

such comments will prevent you from

prompt submission, you should notify

the OMB reviewer and the Department

of Justice Clearance Officer of your

intent as soon as possible. Written

comments regarding the burden

estimate or any other aspect of the

collection may be submitted to Office of

Information and Regulatory Affairs,

Office of Management and Budget,

Washington, DC 20503, and to Mr.

Robert B. Briggs, Department of Justice

Clearance Officer, Systems Policy Staff/

Information Resources Management/

Justice Management Division, Suite 850,

WCTR, Washington, DC 20530.

Extension of a Currently Approved

Collection

(1) Document Verification Request.

(2) G–845. Immigration and

Naturalization Service, United States

Department of Justice.

(3) Primary=Individuals and

Households, Others=None. This form is

an integral part of the Systematic Alien

Verification for Entitlement (SAVE)

Program. It will provide direct access to

the Immigration and Naturalization

Service’s Alien Status Verification Index

(ASVI).

(4) 500,000 annual respondents at

.083 hours per response.
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 33 / Friday, February 17, 1995 / Notices 9399

(5) 41,500 annual burden hours.

(6) Not applicable under Section

3504(h) of Public Law 96–511.

Public comment on this item is

encouraged.

Dated: February 13, 1995.

Robert B. Briggs,

Department Clearance Officer, United States

Department of Justice.

[FR Doc. 95–4005 Filed 2–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–10–M

Information Collections Under Review

The Office of Management and Budget

(OMB) has been sent the following

collection(s) of information proposals

for review under the provisions of the

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.

Chapter 35) and the Paperwork

Reduction Reauthorization Act since the

last list was published. Entries are

grouped into submission categories,

with each entry containing the

following information:

(1) The title of the form/collection;

(2) The agency form number, if any,

and the applicable component of the

Department sponsoring the collection.

(3) Who will be asked or required to

respond, as well as a brief abstract;

(4) An estimate of the total number of

respondents and the amount of time

estimated for an average respondent to

respond;

(5) An estimate of the total public

burden (in hours) associated with the

collection; and

(6) An indication as to whether

Section 3504(h) of Public Law 96–511

applies.

Comments and/or suggestions

regarding the item(s) contained in this

notice, especially regarding the

estimated public burden and associated

response time, should be directed to the

OMB reviewer, Mr. Jeff Hill on (202)

395–7340 and to the Department of

Justice’s Clearance Officer, Mr. Robert B.

Briggs, on (202) 514–4319. If you

anticipate commenting on a form/

collection, but find that time to prepare

such comments will prevent you from

prompt submission, you should notify

the OMB reviewer and the Department

of Justice Clearance Officer of your

intent as soon as possible. Written

comments regarding the burden

estimate or any other aspect of the

collection may be submitted to Office of

Information and Regulatory Affairs,

Office of Management and Budget,

Washington, DC 20503, and to Mr.

Robert B. Briggs, Department of Justice

Clearance Officer, Systems Policy Staff/

Information Resources Management/

Justice Management Division, Suite 850,

WCTR, Washington, DC 20530.

Extension of a Currently Approved

Collection

(1) Application—Land Border

Facilitation PORTPASS Program

(2) I–823, I–823A, I–823B, I–823C,

and I–823D. Immigration and

Naturalization Service, United States

Department of Justice.

(3) Primary = Individuals and

Households, Others = None. This form

covers two land border programs. At

participating ports-of-entry, this form

will be used by frequent crossers to

voluntarily apply for permission to use

the dedicated commuter lane, or to enter

through an Automated Permit Port.

(4) 200,000 annual respondents at .73

hours (44 minutes) per response.

(5) 132,800 annual burden hours.

(6) Not applicable under Section

3504(h) of Public Law 96–511.

Public comment on this item is

encouraged.

Dated: February 13, 1995.

Robert B. Briggs,

Department Clearance Officer, United States

Department of Justice.

[FR Doc. 95–4006 Filed 2–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–10–M

Antitrust Division

United States v. Sabreliner

Corporation; Proposed Final Judgment

and Competitive Impact Statement

Notice is hereby given pursuant to the

Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act,

15 U.S.C. 16(b)–(h), that a proposed

Final Judgment and Competitive Impact

Statement have been filed with the

United States District Court for the

District of Columbia in United States of

America v. Sabreliner Corporation.

The Complaint in this case alleges

that the acquisition of Midcoast

Aviation, Inc. (‘‘Midcoast’’) by

Sabreliner Corporation (‘‘Sabreliner’’)

may substantially lessen competition in

the sale of jet fuel to transient general

aviation aircraft at Lambert-St. Louis

International airport (‘‘Lambert’’) in

violation of Section 7 of the Clayton

Act.

Sabreliner and Midcoast are the only

two fixed base operators (‘‘FBOs’’) at

Lambert Field. Fixed base operators

provide terminaling services, such as

aircraft cleaning, de-icing and fueling to

general aviation aircraft. These services

are typically included in the price of jet

fuel sold to the general aviation

customer. This acquisition, left

unchallenged, would result in a

monopoly in the provision of jet fuel to

transient general aviation customers at

Lambert.

The proposed Final Judgment requires

Sabreliner to divest either its transient

general aviation fueling facilities at

Lambert, or, if necessary to attract a

purchaser, its entire FBO operation at

Lambert. If defendant does not complete

the divestiture by the allotted time, a

trustee will be appointed to conduct the

divestiture.

Public comment on the proposed

Final Judgment is invited within the

statutory 60-day comment period. Such

comments, and responses thereto, will

be published in the Federal Register

and filed with the Court. Comments

should be directed to Roger W. Fones,

Chief, Transportation, Energy, and

Agriculture Section, Antitrust Division,

Room 9104, Judiciary Center Building,

555 4th Street, NW., Washington, DC

20001 (202–307–6351).

Constance K. Robinson,

Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

United States of America; Plaintiff; vs.

Sabreliner Corporation, a corporation;

Defendant.

[Docket Number: 95–0241]

Stipulation

It is stipulated by and between the

undersigned parties, by their respective

attorneys, as follows:

(1) The Court has jurisdiction over the

subject matter of this action and over

each of the parties hereto, and venue of

this action is proper in the District for

the District of Columbia.

(2) The parties consent that a Final

Judgment in the form hereto attached

may be filed and entered by the Court,

upon the motion of any party or upon

the Court’s own motion, at any time

after compliance with the requirements

of the Antitrust Procedures and

Penalties Act (15 U.S.C. 16), and

without further notice to any party or

other proceedings, provided that

plaintiff has not withdrawn its consent,

which it may do at any time before the

entry of the proposed final Judgment by

serving notice thereof on defendant and

by filing that notice with the Court.

(3) In the event plaintiff withdraws its

consent or if the proposed Final

Judgment is not entered pursuant to this

Stipulation, this Stipulation shall be of

no effect whatever, and the making of

this Stipulation shall be without

prejudice to any party in this or any

other proceeding.

Dated: November 2, 1994.