alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Level of Monthly Benefits (PIA) | Description of Proposed Provision:      Progressive indexing of PIA formula factors beginning with individuals newly eligible for OASI benefits in 2012, continuing through 2021, and then resuming in 2060.  Create new bend point at the 30th percentile of earners. Maintain current-law benefits for earners at the 30th percentile and below and reduce upper 2 formula factors (32% and 15%) such that maximum worker benefit is reduced by 1.1 percent per year as compared to current law, for the years that progressive indexing applies.  Disability benefits are not affected by the proposal. Disabled worker beneficiaries, upon attaining normal retirement age, would be subject to a proportional reduction in benefits based on the worker's years of disability. |
|---------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2009 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified January 28, 2010 |
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 

 

I, Jerry C. Young, as Chief Financial Officer of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors: 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: February 21, 2006
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 17

- 00084

- CR

Fernando Martinez Balladares

v. The State of Texas

On a ppeal from the 139th District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Cause No. CR

- 1283

- 15

- C

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having consid ered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. August 30 , 2018
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 7, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 12551]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5474]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. TM95-9-29-000]


Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.; Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

March 1, 1995.
    Take notice that Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation (TGPL), 
tendered for filing on February 24, 1995 certain revised tariff sheets 
to its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1 and Original Volume 
No. 2, which tariff sheets are enumerated in Appendix A attached to the 
filing. The proposed effective date of the attached tariff sheets is 
April 1, 1995.
    TGPL states that the instant filing is submitted pursuant to 
Section 41 of the General Terms and Conditions of TGPL's FERC Gas 
Tariff which provides that TGPL will file to reflect net changes in the 
Transmission Electric Power (TEP) rates 30 days prior to each TEP 
Annual Period beginning April 1. TGPL states that attached in Appendix 
B to the filing are workpapers supporting the derivation of the revised 
TEP rates reflected on the tariff sheets included therein.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426, in accordance with Secs. 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests should be filed on 
or before March 8, 1995. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing 
to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this 
filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-5474 Filed 3-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONRAD
INDUSTRIES INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           5,420
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,324
<ALLOWANCES>                                        20
<INVENTORY>                                        209
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,232
<PP&E>                                          26,971
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,304
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  46,675
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,212
<BONDS>                                          6,061
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            71
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,935
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    46,675
<SALES>                                         18,170
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,170
<CGS>                                           13,389
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,389
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,867
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 339
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,575
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,051
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,524
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,524
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.22


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 41 (Thursday, March 2, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 11658]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5080]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board Task Force on Role of Federally Funded 
Research & Development Centers (FFRDC's) in DoD Mission

ACTION: Notice of advisory committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Role of Federally 
Funded Research & Development Centers (FFRDC's) in DoD Mission will 
meet in open session on March 13, 1995 at the Institute for Defense 
Analyses, 2001 N. Beauregard Street, Alexandria, Virginia.

    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition on 
scientific and technical matters as they affect the perceived needs of 
the Department of Defense.
    Persons interested in further information should call Mr. Robert 
Nemetz at (703) 756-2096.

    Dated: February 24, 1995.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 95-5080 Filed 3-1-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
##### 



Exhibit 99.3

INTERSTATE HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
CERTIFICATION PURSAUNT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interstate Hotels & Resorts, Inc.,
(the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, James A. Calder Chief, Accounting Officer of Interstate Hotels & Resorts,
Inc., certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | 1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                            
| | -- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Registrant.

/s/ James A. Calder

James A. Calder
Chief Accounting Officer
August 14, 2002

25
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 40 (Wednesday, March 1, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11191-11192]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4919]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service
[Dept. Circ. 570, 1994 Rev., Supp. No. 10]


Surety Companies Acceptable on Federal Bonds: Christinia General 
Insurance Corporation of New York

    A Certificate of Authority as an acceptable surety on Federal Bonds 
is hereby issued to the following company under Sections 9304 to 9308, 
Title 31, of the United States Code Federal bond-approving officers 
should annotate their reference copies of the Treasury Circular 570, 
1994 Revision, on page 34148 to reflect this addition:

Christinia General Insurance Corporation of New York

Business Address: 120 White Plains Road, Tarrytown, NY 10591 
Telephone No. (914) 631-3636. Underwriting Limitation b/: 
$8,697,000. Surety Licenses c/: AL, AK, AR, CA, DC, ID, IA, KS, KY, 
MD, MS, NV, NY, ND, OH, PA, SD, TN, TX, UT, WA, WI, WY. Incorporated 
in: New York.

    Certificates of Authority expire on June 30 each year, unless 
revoked prior to that date. The Certificates are subject to subsequent 
annual renewal as long as the companies remain qualified (31 CFR, Part 
223). A list of qualified companies is published annually as of July 1 
in Treasury Department Circular 570, with details as to underwriting 
limitations, areas in which licensed to transact surety business and 
other information.
    Copies of the Circular may be obtained for the Surety Bond Branch, 
Funds Management Division, Financial Management Service, Department of 
the [[Page 11192]] Treasury, Hyattsville, MD 20782, Telephone (202 874-
6696.

    Dated: February 16, 1995.
Charles F. Schwan III,
Director, Funds Management Division, Financial Management Services.
[FR Doc. 95-4919 Filed 2-28-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP

Stephen Karotkin (pro hac vice) 

(stephen.karotkin@weil.com) 

Ray C. Schrock, P.C. (pro hac vice) 

(ray.schrock@weil.com) 

Jessica Liou (pro hac vice) 

(jessica.liou@weil.com) 

Matthew Goren (pro hac vice) 

(matthew.goren@weil.com) 

767 Fifth Avenue 

New York, NY 10153-0119 

Tel: 212 310 8000 

Fax: 212 310 8007 

KELLER & BENVENUTTI LLP 

Tobias S. Keller (#151445) 

(tkeller@kellerbenvenutti.com) 

Jane Kim (#298192) 

(jkim@kellerbenvenutti.com) 

650 California Street, Suite 1900 

San Francisco, CA 94108 

Tel: 415 496 6723 

Fax: 650 636 9251 

Attorneys for Debtors and Debtors in Possession

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION,

 - and - 

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY,

Bankruptcy Case No. 19-30088 (DM)

Chapter 11 (Lead Case) (Jointly Administered) 

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE OF 

MAX M. AFRICK 

Debtors.

 Affects PG&E Corporation 

 Affects Pacific Gas and Electric 

Company 

 Affects both Debtors 

* All papers shall be filed in the Lead 

Case, No. 19-30088 (DM). 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4627 Filed: 11/08/19 Entered: 11/08/19 14:49:32 Page 1 of

2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the appearance of Max M. Africk, Esq. on behalf of Debtors 

PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company in the above-entitled action is hereby 

withdrawn. Service of pleadings and notices, including CM/ECF electronic notification, upon him in 

these cases should be discontinued. 

Dated: November 8, 2019 WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP

 KELLER & BENVENUTTI LLP 

/s/ Dara L. Silveira

Dara L. Silveira

Attorneys for Debtors and Debtors in Possession

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4627 Filed: 11/08/19 Entered: 11/08/19 14:49:32 Page 2 of

2
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 10, 2014

NO. 03-13-00770-CV

Wanda McDonald, Appellant

v.

Federal National Mortgage Association, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND ROSE

DISMISSED AS MOOT -- OPINION BY JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on November 8, 2013. Having 

reviewed the record, it appears that the appeal should be dismissed. Therefore, the Court 

dismisses the appeal. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of 

costs is made.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 15, 2010 

s0908 

Order 

 

September 15, 2010 

140685 

CAROL DRAKE and CLELLEN BURY, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v SC: 140685 

 COA: 287502 

Berrien CC: 2008-000247-CE 

CITY OF BENTON HARBOR and HARBOR 

SHORES COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT 

CORPORATION, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 21, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral 

argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 

7.302(H)(1). At oral argument, the parties shall address whether the City of Benton 

Harbor may lease a portion of Jean Klock Park to Harbor Shores Community 

Redevelopment Corporation to develop 3 holes of a proposed 18-hole championship Jack 

Nicklaus golf course, without violating: (1) the restriction set forth in the 1917 deed; or 

(2) the January 27, 2004 consent judgment in an earlier lawsuit between the plaintiffs and 

the City relating to the City’s sale of a portion of Jean Klock Park to Grand Boulevard 

Renaissance, LLC, for the construction of a residential development. The parties may 

file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order, but they should not 

submit mere restatements of their application papers. 

The Michigan Municipal League and the Michigan Recreation and Park 

Association are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in 

the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission 

to file briefs amicus curiae.
### MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04

- 12

- 00232

- CV IN RE Carmen RINCON , a Child

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Delivered and Filed: April 25, 2012 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED On April 20, 2012, Relator Carmen Rincon filed a Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Motion for Temporary Relief in this court. In her petit ion, r elator asks that we compel respondent, the Honorable W.C. Kirkendall, to vacate his February 15, 2012 order denying

r elator the right to revoke the Mediated Settlement Agreement. Additionally, her motion for temporary relief requests that this court stay the trial court’s order pending the outcome of the mandamus. Relator has not shown that she is entitled to the relief requested, and we deny both the petition and motion for temporary relief. See T EX
. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN
. § 22.221 (West 2004); see also T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 10

- 1944

- CV, styled In the Matter of the Marriage of Alphonso Cantu Rincon and Carmen Yolanda Rincon , pending in the Second 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas, the Honorable W.C. Kirkendall presiding.04

- 12

- 00232

- CV

- 2

- Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will issue only if : (1) the trial court clearly abused its discretion ; and (2) the party requesting mandamus relief has no adequate remedy by appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am ., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135

– 36 (Tex. 2004); Walker v. Packer , 82 7 S.W.2d 833, 839

– 40 (Tex. 1992). Relator has an adequate remedy by appeal. See Metzger v. Metzger , N o . 01

- 04

- 00893

- CV , 2007 WL 1633445 (Tex. App.

— Hou ston [ 1 st Dist.] Jun 07, 2007 , pet. denied ) ( mem. op.) ; Rodriguez v. Harding , N o . 04

- 02

- 00093

- CV , 2002 WL 31863766 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio Dec 24, 2002 , no pet.) (mem. op) ; Spinks v. Spinks , 9 39 S.W.2d 229, 229

- 30 (Tex. App.

— Hou ston [1st Dist.] 1997, no writ). Accordingly, Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.

PER CURIAM
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 37 (Friday, February 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 10382]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4502]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket Nos. RP94-96-011 and RP94-213-008 (consolidated)]


CNG Transmission Corporation; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

February 17, 1995.
    Take notice that on February 15, 1995, CNG Transmission Corporation 
(CNG), filed for inclusion in its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised 
Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets:

Tariff Sheet and Proposed Effective Date

4th Substitute 1st Revised Sheet No. 31--July 1, 1994
3rd Substitute 1st Revised Sheet No. 201--July 1, 1994
2nd Substitute 2nd Revised Sheet No. 31--October 1, 1994
2nd Substitute 3rd Revised Sheet No. 31--November 1, 1994

    CNG states that these tariff sheets are being filed in compliance 
with the Commission's January 31, 1995, letter order in the captioned 
proceedings.
    CNG states that copies of this letter of transmittal and enclosures 
are being mailed to CNG's customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol 
Street, NE., Washington, DC, 20426, in accordance with Rule 211 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211. All 
protests should be filed on or before February 27, 1995. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action 
to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-4502 Filed 2-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M