alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Year Cost Rate

Income 

Rate

Annual 

Balance

2008 11.20 12.77 1.57 359

2009 11.27 12.81 1.54 369

2010 11.27 12.82 1.55 382

2011 11.34 12.83 1.50 394

2012 11.47 12.86 1.39 404

2013 11.64 12.89 1.24 412

2014 11.83 12.90 1.06 419

2015 12.04 12.91 0.88 424

2016 12.26 12.93 0.68 427

2017 12.49 12.95 0.47 429

2018 12.70 12.97 0.27 430

2019 12.92 12.98 0.06 429

2020 13.14 13.00 -0.14 427

2021 13.35 13.01 -0.33 425

2022 13.54 13.03 -0.52 422

2023 13.73 13.04 -0.69 418

2024 13.91 13.05 -0.86 414

2025 14.08 13.06 -1.02 409

2026 14.24 13.07 -1.16 403

2027 14.39 13.09 -1.30 396

2028 14.53 13.10 -1.44 389

2029 14.66 13.10 -1.55 381

2030 14.77 13.11 -1.65 373

2031 14.85 13.12 -1.73 365

2032 14.93 13.13 -1.80 357

2033 14.97 13.13 -1.84 348

2034 15.00 13.13 -1.87 340

2035 15.01 13.14 -1.87 332

2036 15.01 13.14 -1.87 324

2037 15.00 13.14 -1.86 316

2038 14.97 13.14 -1.83 309

2039 14.93 13.14 -1.80 301

2040 14.89 13.14 -1.75 294

2041 14.84 13.14 -1.70 287

2042 14.79 13.13 -1.66 280

2043 14.75 13.13 -1.62 274

2044 14.71 13.13 -1.58 267

2045 14.67 13.13 -1.54 260

2046 14.64 13.13 -1.51 254

2047 14.62 13.13 -1.49 247

2048 14.60 13.13 -1.47 241

2049 14.58 13.13 -1.45 234

2050 14.57 13.13 -1.44 228

2051 14.57 13.13 -1.44 221

2052 14.57 13.13 -1.44 214

2053 14.58 13.13 -1.45 207

2054 14.59 13.13 -1.46 199

2055 14.61 13.13 -1.48 192

2056 14.63 13.14 -1.50 184

2057 14.65 13.14 -1.52 176

2058 14.67 13.14 -1.54 168

2059 14.69 13.14 -1.55 160

2060 14.71 13.14 -1.57 151

2061 14.73 13.14 -1.59 142

2062 14.75 13.15 -1.61 133

2063 14.77 13.15 -1.62 124

2064 14.79 13.15 -1.64 115

2065 14.81 13.15 -1.66 105

Detailed Single Year Tables

Category of Change: Cost-of-Living Adjustment

Proposed Provision: Beginning December 2009, reduce cost-of-living adjustment for OASDI benefits by 

1 percentage point

Expressed as a percentage of taxable payrol Trust Fund 

Ratio 

1-1-year
2066 14.83 13.15 -1.68 95

2067 14.86 13.15 -1.70 85

2068 14.88 13.15 -1.72 75

2069 14.90 13.16 -1.75 64

2070 14.93 13.16 -1.77 53

2071 14.96 13.16 -1.80 42

2072 14.99 13.16 -1.83 31

2073 15.02 13.16 -1.86 19

2074 15.05 13.17 -1.89 7

2075 15.09 13.17 -1.92 ----

2076 15.12 13.17 -1.95 ----

2077 15.16 13.17 -1.98 ----

2078 15.19 13.17 -2.02 ----

2079 15.23 13.18 -2.05 ----

2080 15.27 13.18 -2.09 ----

2081 15.31 13.18 -2.13 ----

2082 15.34 13.18 -2.16 ----

2083 15.38 13.18 -2.20 ----

2084 15.42 13.19 -2.23 ----

2085 15.46 13.19 -2.27 ----

Summarized Rates: OASDI

2008 Cost Rate Income Rate

Actuarial 

Balance

-2082 14.13% 13.86% -0.27% 1.43%

Office of the Chief Actuary, Social Security

Estimates based on Intermediate Assumptions of the 2008 Trustees Report

Change in 

Actuarial Balance

July 17, 2008
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1752

Katadyn North America, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions_03.20.1

9.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         10,675
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  8,649
<ALLOWANCES>                                   50
<INVENTORY>                                    13,299
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               34,063
<PP&E>                                         35,131
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (14,968)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 56,356
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,487
<BONDS>                                        2,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       175
<OTHER-SE>                                     45,618
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   56,356
<SALES>                                        13,530
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               13,530
<CGS>                                          10,480
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  10,480
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,896
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             33
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,253
<INCOME-TAX>                                   438
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            815
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   815
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .10
        


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Da-Lite ScreenCompany, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending January 1, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard E Lundin, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: February 26, 2010
#### STATE v. JAMES L. McKINNEY.

(Filed 2 December, 1959.)

Appeal by defendant from *CHssman, J.,*February 24, 1959 Criminal Term, Greensboro Division of Gtjilfoed Superior Court.

*Attorney General Seawell and Assistant Attorney General Moody for the State.*

*J. Kenneth Lee for defendant, appellant.*

PeR Cueiam.

On August 14, 1958, in a criminal prosecution in the Municipal-County Court of Greensboro, defendant was found guilty of the unlawful possession of whiskey for the purpose of sale; and a prison sentence of twelve months, imposed by the court’s judgment, was suspended upon the condition, *inter alia,*that defendant “shall not have in his possession any type of alcoholic beverage unless prescribed by a physician for personal consumption for a period of Five (5) years.” Later, the said municipal-county court and. also Judge Crissman, after *de novo*hearing on defendant’s appeal as provided by G.S. 15-200.1, found as a fact that defendant on November 22, 1958, violated said condition on which the prison sentence was suspended and ordered that defendant serve said prison sentence.

Defendant’s appeal to this Court is without merit. The evidence heard by Judge Crissman was sufficient to support his findings of fact and these findings of fact are sufficient to support his judgment.

Affirmed.
Opinion issued February 13, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-23-00490-CV

———————————

ENI INTERNATIONAL RESOURCES LIMITED, Appellant

V.

JIMENA MOLINA-VACAS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS 

REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF FRANCISCO JAVIER VACAS, 

DECEASED, MICHAEL VACAS, DAVID VACAS, AND NICOLE VACAS,

AS WRONGFUL DEATH BENEFICIARIES OF FRANCISCO JAVIER 

VACAS, DECEASED, Appellees

On Appeal from the 270th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2022-73740

MEMORANDUM OPINION
2

Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss its appeal. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 10.3(a)(2), 42.1(a)(1). No opinion has issued. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(c). 

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Landau and Rivas-Molloy.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Unify Corporation (the
Company) for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Todd E.
Wille, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), that, to the best of my
knowledge:

|(1) |  | The Report fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and                                                                   
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | The information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the
      period covered by the Report.

July 21, 2009

| | /s/ TODD E. WILLE                     | 
| | ------------------------------------- | 
| | Todd
      E. Wille                  
| | President and Chief Executive
Officer



|A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
      to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 and shall
      not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be
      deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**Certifications**

 

I, Matthew E. Czajkowski, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of POZEN Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained in SEC Release 34-47986] 

 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of the annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 6, 2003****
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Lawyer Media, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), William L.
Pollak, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Stephen C. Jacobs, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ William L. Pollak
------------------------------
William L. Pollak
Chief Executive Officer
August 13, 2002

/s/ Stephen C. Jacobs
------------------------------
Stephen C. Jacobs
Chief Financial Officer
August 13, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 46 (Thursday, March 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 12940]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5730]



[[Page 12940]]

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

[Docket No. RP95-184-000]


North Penn Gas Co.; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

March 3, 1995
    Take notice that on March 1, 1995, North Penn Gas Company (North 
Penn), tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1, Sixteenth Revised Sheet No. 3A, with a proposed 
effective date of April 1, 1995.
    North Penn states that the purpose of the filing is to terminate 
North Penn's annual take-or-pay surcharge.
    North Penn respectfully requests waiver of any of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations as may be required to permit this filing to 
become effective April 1, 1995, as proposed.
    North Penn states that copies of the letter of transmittal and all 
enclosures are being mailed to each of North Penn's affected customers 
and State Commissions shown on the service list attached to the filing.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, NE., Washington, D.C. 
20426, in accordance with Secs. 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests should be filed on 
or before March 10, 1995. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-5730 Filed 3-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 19, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133620 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

RENIE MANZELLA and JOSEPH MANZELLA, Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiffs-Appellees, Justices 

v SC: 133620 

 COA: 271365 

Van Buren CC: 05-053501-NI 

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE 

INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Defendant-Appellant, 

and 

ISRAEL MALDONADO MORADO, 

FERNANDO OJEDA MIRANDA, and 

PROGRESSIVE MICHIGAN INSURANCE 

COMPANY, 

 Defendants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 4, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral 

argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 

7.302(G)(1). At oral argument, the parties shall address the dissenting opinion in the 

Court of Appeals. The parties may file supplemental briefs within 28 days of the date of 

this order, but they should not submit mere restatements of their application papers. 

p1016 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 19, 2007 

 Clerk
NO. 12-17-00386-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN RE:

VICTOR VEGA, 

RELATOR

§

§

§

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Victor Vega, an inmate acting pro se, has filed an original proceeding in which he 

complains of the trial court’s failure to file findings of fact and conclusions of law. Generally, a 

party seeking mandamus relief must bring forward all that is necessary to establish his claim for 

mandamus relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52. This entails filing an appendix and record as part of the 

petition. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k), 52.7. The contents of both are prescribed by the rules of 

appellate procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k), 52.7(a). 

On December 7, 2017, this Court notified Vega that his petition fails to comply with 

Rules 52.3(k) and 52.7. This Court informed Vega that the petition would be referred to the 

Court for dismissal unless the appendix and record were provided by December 18. In response, 

Vega maintains that the Appendix requirement may be “satisfied by the existing filings in the 

Trial Court’s docket.” He further maintains that he cannot furnish copies of the trial court’s 

order because he has no access to a photocopier. 

“Although the claims pleaded in pro se inmate petitions should be liberally construed, the 

same procedural standards apply to inmates as to other litigants.” In re Buholtz, No. 05-14-

01286-CV, 2014 WL 5426127, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Oct. 27, 2014, orig. proceeding) (mem. 

op.). “If a pro se litigant is not required to comply with the applicable rules of procedure, he 

would be given an unfair advantage over a litigant who is represented by counsel.” Id. “There 

cannot be two sets of procedural rules, one for litigants with counsel and the other for litigants 
2

representing themselves.” Id. Accordingly, because Vega has provided this Court with neither 

an appendix nor a record, we are unable to determine that he is entitled to mandamus relief. 

Thus, we deny Vega’s petition for writ of mandamus.

Opinion delivered December 21, 2017.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(PUBLISH)
3

COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

DECEMBER 21, 2017

NO. 12-17-00386-CV

VICTOR VEGA,

Relator

V.

HON. PAM FLETCHER,

Respondent

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus filed by 

Victor Vega; who is the relator in Cause No. DCCV17-432-349, pending on the docket of the 

349th Judicial District Court of Anderson County, Texas. Said petition for writ of mandamus 

having been filed herein on December 7, 2017, and the same having been duly considered, 

because it is the opinion of this Court that a writ should not issue, it is therefore CONSIDERED, 

ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the said petition for writ of mandamus be, and the same is, 

hereby denied.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
EXHIBIT 32.2

STATEMENT OF CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER 
  OF PREMIERE GLOBAL
SERVICES, INC. 
  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO 
  § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In
connection  with the Annual Report of Premiere  Global  Services,  Inc. (the  Company)
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the Report),  the undersigned Michael E.
Havener,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  § 1350,
 as adopted  pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) |  | The
Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities  Exchange Act of                      1934; and
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) |  | The
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the
financial condition and                      results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | /s/ Michael
E. HavenerMichael
E. Havener Chief
Financial Officer 
Premiere Global
Services, Inc. 
February 29, 2008
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | 
| |  | 

---