13450 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 48 / Monday, March 13, 1995 / Notices

Pursuant to 25 CFR 83.8(a) (formerly

25 CFR 54.8(a)) notice is hereby given

that the Occaneechi Band of Saponi

Nation, c/o Lawrence Dunmore, 4006

Mary’s Grove Church Road, Mebane,

North Carolina 27302 has filed a

petition for acknowledgment by the

Secretary of the Interior that the group

exists as an Indian tribe. The petition

was received by the Bureau of Indian

Affairs (BIA) on January 6, 1995, and

was signed by members of the group’s

governing body.

This is a notice of receipt of petition

and does not constitute notice that the

petition is under active consideration.

Notice of active consideration will be

sent by mail to the petitioner and other

interested parties at the appropriate

time.

Under Section 83.8(d) (formerly

54.8(d)) of the Federal regulations,

interested parties and informed parties

may submit factual and/or legal

arguments in support of or in opposition

to the group’s petition. Any information

submitted will be made available on the

same basis as other information in the

BIA’s files. Such submissions will be

provided to the petitioner upon receipt

by the BIA. The petitioner will be

provided an opportunity to respond to

such submissions prior to a final

determination regarding the petitioner’s

status.

The petition may be examined, by

appointment, in the Department of the

Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs,

Branch of Acknowledgment and

Research, Room 1362–MIB, 1849 C

Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20240,

Phone: (202) 208–3592.

Dated: February 23, 1995.

Ada E. Deer,

Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

[FR Doc. 95–6141 Filed 3–10–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–02–M

National Park Service

General Management Plan; Grand

Canyon National Park, Arizona; Notice

of Availability; Draft Environmental

Impact Statement

Summary: Pursuant to section 102

(2)(C) of the National Environmental

Policy Act of 1969 (Pub. L. 91–190, as

amended), the National Park Service,

Department of the Interior, has prepared

a draft environmental impact statement

(DEIS) that describes and analyzes a

proposed action and four alternatives

for the general management plan for

Grand Canyon National Park. The

official responsible for a decision on the

proposed action is the Regional

Director, Western Region, National Park

Service.

Comments: Comments on the DEIS

should be received no later than April

24, 1995. Dates for public meetings

regarding the DEIS will be from March

25 to 29, 1995 in various locations in

Arizona and Utah. Written responses to

the DEIS should be submitted to

Planning Team Leader, Grand Canyon

General Management Plan, National

Park Service, Denver Service CenterTWE, P.O. Box 25287, Denver, CO

80225–0287.

Public Meetings: All of the public

meetings are to be held evenings from

6:00–9:00 pm. The March 25 meeting

will be at the Best Western Red Hills

Hotel, 124 W. Center, Kanab, Utah. The

March 27 meeting will be at the Grand

Canyon School Multipurpose Room,

Boulder St., Grand Canyon, Arizona.

The March 28 meeting will be at the

Woodlands Plaza Hotel, 1175 W. Route

66, Flagstaff, Arizona. The March 29

meeting will be at the Ramada

Camelback Hotel, 502 W. Camelback

Rd., Phoenix, Arizona.

Review Copies: Public reading copies

of the DEIS will be available for review

at three locations: [1] Office of Public

Affairs, National Park Service,

Department of the Interior, 18th and C

Streets, NW, Washington, DC 20240

(202) 208–6843; [2] Western Regional

Office, National Park Service, 600

Harrison St., Suite 600, San Francisco,

CA 94107–1372 (415) 415–744–3968; [3]

Headquarters, Grand Canyon National

Park, P.O. Box 129, Grand Canyon, AZ

86023 (602) 638–7701.

A limited number of copies of the

DEIS are available on request from: Rob

Arnberger, Superintendent, Grand

Canyon National Park, P.O. Box 129,

Grand Canyon, AZ 86023 (602) 638–

7701; or the Planning Team Leader,

Grand Canyon General Management

Plan, National Park Service, Denver

Service Center-TWE, P.O. Box 25287,

Denver, CO 80225–0287 (303) 969–

2210.

Supplementary Information: This

general management plan provides

management objectives and visions for

the entire park, with alternative plans

for the park’s developed areas (South

Rim, North Rim, Tuweep, and corridor

trails). The proposed action, the noaction alternative, and three other

alternatives are presented in this

document, and their environmental

consequences are analyzed.

The proposed action (alternative 2)

would emphasize regional cooperation

for information distribution, regional

resource preservation, and a quality

visitor experience. A major shift away

from the use of private automobiles

would occur. Alternative modes of

transportation would be emphasized

throughout the region, with staging

areas linked to regional private transit

services in outlying communities and a

public transit system within the park.

Private vehicles would be removed from

the heaviest use areas in the park,

creating pedestrian-only areas. The

number of private vehicles allowed into

the park at any one time would be

limited in certain areas. The adaptive

use of historic structures and other

structures would be maximized. The

construction of new facilities within the

park would be almost entirely within

disturbed areas. The visitor experience

would be defined by the unique

qualities of each individual area, and

the number of visitors allowed into

some areas of the park would be

determined by a carrying capacity

analysis. With respect to environmental

consequences, the proposed action

would stabilize the growth of

infrastructure within the park, enhance

natural and cultural resource

preservation, improve significantly the

visitor experience, create better living

and working conditions for park

employees, and benefit local economies.

The other alternatives include:

Continuing existing conditions (the noaction alternative), a minimum

requirements alternative (alternative 1),

reduced development within the park

(alternative 3), and increased

development within the park

(alternative 4).

The responsible official for a decision

on the proposed action is the Regional

Director, Western Region, National Park

Service.

Dated: February 28, 1995.

Stanley T. Albright,

Regional Director, Western Region.

[FR Doc. 95–6101 Filed 3–10–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–70–P

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree

Pursuant to the Clean Air Act

In accordance with Departmental

policy, 28 C.F.R. 50.7, notice is hereby

given that a proposed consent decree in

United States v. Mundet-Hermetite, Inc.,

Civil Action No. 95–0009–L, was lodged

on February 24, 1995 with the United

States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia. The Consent Decree

settles an action brought under Section

113 of the Clean Air Act (the ‘‘Act’’), 42

U.S.C. 7413, seeing an injunction and

civil penalties for defendant’s violation

of the Prevention of Significant
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 48 / Monday, March 13, 1995 / Notices 13451

Deterioration (PSD) requirements of 42

U.S.C 7470, et. seq., and the regulations

promulgated thereunder. Pursuant to

the Consent Decree, defendant has

agreed to pay a civil penalty of $90,000,

to cease the plant process which was the

source of the violation, and not to

recommence that process except in

compliance with the Clean Air Act.

The Department of Justice will

receive, for a period of thirty (30) days

from the date of this publication,

comments relating to the proposed

consent decree. Comments should be

addressed to the Assistant Attorney

General for the Environment and

Natural Resources Division, Department

of Justice, Washington, DC 20530, and

should refer to United States v. MundetHermetitite, Inc., DOJ Ref. #90–5–2–1–

1949.

The proposed consent decree may be

examined at the office of the United

States Attorney, 105 Franklin Rd. SW,

Suite 1, Roanoke, VA 24011; and at the

Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street,

NW., 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20005,

(202) 624–0892. A copy of the proposed

consent decree may be obtained in

person or by mail from the Consent

Decree Library, 1120 G Street, NW., 4th

Floor, Washington, DC 20005. In

requesting a copy please refer to the

referenced case and enclose a check in

the amount of $3.75 (25 cents per page

reproduction costs), payable to the

Consent Decree Library.

Joel M. Gross,

Acting Chief, Environmental Enforcement

Section, Environment and Natural Resources

Division.

[FR Doc. 95–6048 Filed 3–10–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–01–M

Notice of Lodging of Partial Consent

Decree for Claims Under Section

107(a) of the Comprehensive

Environmental Response,

Compensation, and Liability Act

In accordance with Department policy

notice is hereby given that on February

10, 1995, a proposed Partial Consent

Decree in United States v. SmugglerDurant Mining Corporation, et al., Civil

Action No. 89–C–1802, was lodged with

the United States District Court for the

District of Colorado. The Complaint in

this case was brought under Section

107(a) of the Comprehensive

Environmental Response, Compensation

and Liability Act of 1980, as amended

(‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq.,

against several parties who are owners

or operators of facilities at which

hazardous substances are being released

into the environment, or who owned or

operated facilities at a time when

hazardous substances were disposed of

there. The United States’ Complaint

sought recovery of costs incurred and to

be incurred by the United States in

connection with the clean up of

hazardous substances at the Smuggler

Mountain Superfund Site (‘‘Site’’) in

and adjacent to the City of Aspen,

Colorado.

The proposed partial Consent Decree

involves the MAXXAM, Inc. and Top of

Aspen, Inc. (‘‘MAXXAM’’). This decree

settles claims brought by the United

States against MAXXAM under Section

107(a) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a),

and provides the MAXXAM a covenant

not to sue for past and future response

costs or response actions under Sections

106 and 107(a) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C.

§§ 9606 and 9607(a), and Section 7003

of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. § 6973 as well as a

limited covenant for natural resource

damages on Operable Unit 1 of the Site.

In return, MAXXAM will reimburse the

United States $1,700,000,00 for

response costs incurred in connection

with the Site. Finally, the decree

resolves potential counterclaims by

MAXXAM against the United States for

any activities conducted on-site by any

instrumentality of the United States.

The Department of Justice will receive

for a period of thirty (30) days from the

date of entry of this publication

comments relating to the proposed

Partial Consent Decree. Comments

should be addressed to the Assistant

Attorney General of the Environment

and Natural Resources Division,

Department of Justice, P.O. Box 7611,

Ben Franklin Station, Washington, D.C.

20044, and should refer to United States

v. Smuggler-Durant Mining Corporation,

et al., DOJ Ref. No. 90–11–2–174.

The proposed Consent Decree may be

examined at the Region VIII Office of

the Environmental Protection Agency,

999 18th Street, Suite 500, Denver,

Colorado 80202; and at the Consent

Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th

Floor, Washington, DC 20005, 202–624–

0892. Copies of the proposed Consent

Decrees may be obtained in person or by

mail from the Consent Decree Library,

1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor,

Washington, D.C. 20005. In requesting a

copy, please refer to the referenced case

and enclose a check in the amount of

$8.25 (25 cents per page reproduction

costs), payable to the Consent Decree

Library.

Joel M. Gross,

Acting Chief, Environmental Enforcement

Section, Environment and Natural Resources

Division.

[FR Doc. 95–6049 Filed 3–10–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–01–M

Antitrust Division

Proposed Termination of Final

Judgment; Bardahl Manufacturing

Corporation, et al.

Notice is hereby given that defendant

Bardahl Manufacturing Corporation

(‘‘Bardahl’’) has filed with the United

States District Court for the Western

District of Washington a motion to

terminate the Final Judgment in United

States v. Bardahl Manufacturing

Corporation, et al., Civil No. 83–71; and

that the Department of Justice

(‘‘Department’’), in a stipulation also

filed with the Court, has consented to

termination of the Final Judgment but

has reserved the right for at least

seventy (70) days after the publication

of the notice to withdraw its consent.

The complaint in this case (filed June

30, 1969) alleged that Bardahl and other

companies affiliated with Bardahl had

conspired to fix uniform prices and

allocate exclusive geographical sales

territories for the sale of motor oils,

greases and lubricants manufactured by

Bardahl and sold by Bardahl

distributors in the United States.

The Final Judgment (entered August

11, 1969) enjoined the defendants from

selling any finished Bardahl products to

any person upon any conditions which

restrict the persons to whom, the prices

at which, or the territory within which

such products may be sold.

The Department has filed with the

court a memorandum setting forth the

reasons why the Government believes

that termination of the Final Judgment

would serve the public interest. Copies

of the Complaint and Final Judgment,

Bardahl’s motion papers, the stipulation

containing the Governemnt’s consent,

the Government’s memorandum, and all

further papers filed with the court in

connection with this motion will be

available for inspection at Room 10–

437, Antitrust Division, Department of

Justice, 10th Street and Pennsylvania

Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20001,

and at the Office of the Clerk of the

United States District Court for the

Western District of Washington, 1010

Fifth Avenue, Room 215, Seattle,

Washington 98104. Copies of any of

these materials may be obtained from

the Antitrust Division upon request and

payment of the copying fee set by

Department of Justice regulations.

Interested persons may submit

comments regarding the proposed

termination of the decree to the

Government. Such comments must be

received by the Division within sixty

(60) days and will be filed with the

court by the Government. Comments

should be addressed to Christoper S.