alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.4






SUPPLEMENTARY AGREEMENT TO THE EXCLUSIVE TECHNICAL
CONSULTING AND SERVICE AGREEMENT


 


THIS SUPPLEMENTARY AGREEMENT TO THE EXCLUSIVE TECHINCAL
CONSULTING AND SERVICE AGREEMENT (the “Supplementary Agreement”) is made and entered into as of October 18, 2022, by
and between the following parties:


 


Party A: 


 


Rollingthunder Technology (Jiangxi)
Co., Ltd., a limited liability company (wholly foreign-owned enterprise) established and existing in accordance with the laws of China,
with its registered office at Room 308, Zone C, Zhejiang University Science and Technology Park, No. 698 Jingdong Avenue, Nanchang Hi-Tech
Industrial Development Zone, Nanchang City, Jiangxi Province (Party A).


 


Party B: 


 


Jiangxi Ruanyun Technology Co., Ltd.,
a limited liability company established and existing in accordance with the laws of China, with its registered office at 3F, Zone C, Zhejiang
University Science and Technology Park, No. 698 Jingdong Avenue, Hi-Tech Industrial Development Zone, Nanchang City, Jiangxi Province.


 


WHEREAS,


 


The Parties have entered into the EXCLUSIVE TECHINCAL CONSULTING AND SERVICE
AGREEMENT dated April 8, 2021 (the “Original Agreement”).


 


NOW THEREFORE, through mutual negotiations,
the Parties hereto agree as follows:


 


		1.	The Parties agree to add term 1.4 to the Original Agreement as follows:



 


“1.4 In order to ensure that Party B
meets the cash flow requirements in daily operation and/or offsets any losses incurred during its operation, Party A shall be entitled
to provide financial support to Party B (only to the extent permitted by PRC laws and/or in accordance with the relevant requirements
of the Stock Exchange Rules (if applicable)), regardless of whether Party B actually causes any such operating losses. For the above purpose,
Party A may provide financial support to Party B and/or any of its shareholders by means of bank entrusted loans or loans or other means
within the scope of not violating PRC laws and regulations, and shall separately sign relevant contracts for such entrusted loans or loans
or other forms of financial assistance.”


  



    


     


    

 


		2.	This Supplementary Agreement constitutes a supplement and amendment to the Original Agreement. In case there is any inconsistency
between them, this Supplementary Agreement shall prevail.



 


		3.	This Supplementary Agreement may be executed in two, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute
one and the same instrument.



 


		4.	This Supplementary Agreement shall become effective upon execution of the Parties.



 


[The remainder of this page is intentionally
left blank]


 






    


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the both Parties have its authorized representative
executed this Supplementary Agreement on the date first above written.


 


Party A: Rollingthunder Technology (Jiangxi) Co.,
Ltd.


Authorized Representative (Signature): /s/
Rollingthunder Technology (Jiangxi) Co., Ltd.


 


Party B: Jiangxi Ruanyun Technology Co., Ltd.


Authorized Representative (Signature): /s/ Jiangxi
Ruanyun Technology Co., Ltd.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

         CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report of Transition Auto Finance II (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Kenneth C. Lowe, the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: August 12, 2005               /s/ Kenneth C. Lowe
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                    Kenneth C. Lowe
                                    Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer

                                       17
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed and read this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Kolorfusion
International, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly Report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information
included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and
for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervisions,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this Quarterly Report is being prepared;(b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this Quarterly Report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    disclosed in this Quarterly Report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter
in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and board of directors performing the equivalent functions of an
audit committee:
 (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
controls over financial reporting; and
 Date: November 30, 2005
    
    By: /s/ Stephen NagelStephen NagelPresident and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9677]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4152]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-158-000]


Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

February 15, 1995.
    Take notice that on February 10, 1995, Natural Gas Pipeline Company 
of America (Natural), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Sixth Revised Volume No. 1, Eleventh Revised Sheet No. 14 and 
Ninth Revised Sheet No. 25, to be effective March 1, 1995.
    Natural states that the filing is submitted to commerce recovering 
effective March 1, 1995, approximately $41.3 million in known and 
measurable gas supply realignment (GSR) costs which have been incurred 
by Natural as a consequence of Order Nos. 636, et seq. Natural states 
that these costs consist of: (1) $29.1 million in pricing differential 
costs pertaining to the supply which Natural is obligated to purchase 
from Mitchell Energy Company and $0.6 million for auctions of other gas 
supply; (2) $6.8 million representing three (3) months' amortization of 
buyout/buydown costs previously claimed in Natural's GSR filings in 
Docket Nos. RP94-122-000 and RP94-249-000; and (3) $1.9 million 
representing the costs associated with coal gasification supplies. Also 
reflected in the filing are unrecovered GSR costs totaling $1.0 million 
based upon comparison of the net deferred account balance of costs and 
recoveries at December 31, 1994.
    Natural requested whatever waivers may be necessary to permit the 
tariff sheets as submitted herein to become effective March 1, 1995.
    Natural states that copies of the filing are being mailed to 
Natural's jurisdiction customers and interested state regulatory 
agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 
20426, in accordance with Secs. 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests should be filed on 
or before February 23, 1995. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of 
the filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection in the public reference room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-4152 Filed 2-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 28, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 10894]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4784]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Information Collection Under OMB Review: Application for 
Authority to Close Loans on an Automatic Basis--Nonsupervised Lenders, 
VA Form 26-8736

agency: Department of Veterans Affairs.

Action: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Veterans Affairs has submitted to OMB the 
following proposal for the collection of information under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). This 
document lists the following information: (1) The title of the 
information collection, and the Department form number(s), if 
applicable; (2) a description of the need and its use; (3) who will be 
required or asked to respond; (4) an estimate of the total annual 
reporting hours, and recordkeeping burden, if applicable; (5) the 
estimated average burden hours per respondent; (6) the frequency of 
response; and (7) an estimated number of respondents.

addresses: Copies of the proposed information collection and supporting 
documents may be obtained from Trish Fineran, Veterans Benefits 
Administration (20M30), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont 
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20420, (202) 273-6886.
    Comments and questions about the items on the list should be 
directed to VA's OMB Desk Officer, Joseph Lackey, NEOB, room 3002, 
Washington, DC 20503, (202) 395-7316. Do not send requests for benefits 
to this address.

dates: Comments on the information collection should be directed to the 
OMB Desk Officer on or before March 30, 1995.

    Dated: February 21, 1995.

    By direction of the Secretary.
Ronald C. Taylor,
Management Analyst.

Reinstatement

    1. Application for Authority to Close Loans on an Automatic Basis--
Nonsupervised Lenders, VA Form 26-8736.
    2. This form is used by nonsupervised lenders to request approval 
to close loans on an automatic basis. The information is used to 
determine whether applicants meet standards of acceptability.
    3. Business or other for-profit.
    4. 42 hours.
    5. 25 minutes.
    6. On occasion.
    7. 100 respondents.

[FR Doc. 95-4784 Filed 2-27-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 42 (Friday, March 3, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 11950]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5198]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[IA-57-94]
RIN 1545-AT06


Cash Reporting by Court Clerks; Hearing Cancellation

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Cancellation of notice of public hearing on proposed 
regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document provides notice of cancellation of a public 
hearing on proposed regulations relating to the information reporting 
requirements of court clerks upon receipt of more than $10,000 in cash 
as bail for any individual charged with a specified criminal offense.

DATES: The public hearing originally scheduled for Monday, March 13, 
1995, beginning at 10 a.m. is cancelled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carol Savage of the Regulations Unit, 
Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate), (202) 622-8452 (not a toll-free 
number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The subject of the public hearing is 
proposed regulations under section 6050I of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986. A notice of proposed rulemaking and public hearing appearing 
in the Federal Register for Thursday, December 15, 1994 (59 FR 64635), 
announced that the public hearing on the proposed regulations would be 
held on Monday, March 13, 1995, beginning at 10 a.m., in the Internal 
Revenue Service Auditorium, Seventh Floor, 7400 Corridor, Internal 
Revenue Service Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, 
D.C.
    The public hearing scheduled for Monday, March 13, 1995, is 
cancelled.
Cynthia E. Grigsby,
Chief, Regulations Unit, Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate).
[FR Doc. 95-5198 Filed 3-2-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 29 (Monday, February 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 8265]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3523]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[License No.: 09/79-0402]


AVI Capital L.P.; Notice of Issuance of a Small Business 
Investment Company License

    On September 15, 1994, a notice was published in the Federal 
Register (59 FR 47366) stating that an application had been filed by 
AVI Capital, L.P., One First Street, Suite 12, Los Altos, CA 94022, 
with the Small Business Administration (SBA) pursuant to Sec. 107.102 
of the Regulations governing small business investment companies (13 
CFR 107.102 (1994)) for a license to operate as a small business 
investment company.
    An additional limited partner of AVI III, Nynex Corporation, is 
expected to indirectly own 10 percent or more of the capital of 
Applicant. Also, AVI Partners Growth Fund II, L.P. (AVI PGF II) will 
not be providing capital to the Applicant. Accordingly, the Applicant 
will begin operations with private capital of $21.9 million solely from 
Associated Ventures III, L.P. (AVI III) and AVI Silicon Valley 
Partners, L.P. (AVI SVP).
    Interested parties were given until close of business September 30, 
1994 to submit their comments to SBA. No comments were received.
    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to section 301(c) of the 
Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended, after having 
considered the application and all other pertinent information, SBA 
issued License No.: 09/79-0402 on February 6, 1995, to AVI Capital, 
L.P. to operate as a small business investment company.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 59.011, Small 
Business Investment Companies)

    Dated: February 7, 1995.
Robert D. Stillman,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 95-3523 Filed 2-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             289                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               175,000                 543,436
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 175,289                 543,436
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          318,032                 110,091
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                     4,349,132               3,849,132
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,491,875)             (3,415,787)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 (142,743)                 433,345
<SALES>                                              0                   1,624
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                   1,624
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,080,563                 676,557
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,076,088)               (674,887)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,076,088)               (674,887)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,475                      46
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 5 (Monday, January 9, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 2427]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-543]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: United States International Trade 
Commission

TIME AND DATE: January 11, 1995 at 2:30 p.m.

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street S.W., Washington, DC 20436.

STATUS:

1. Agenda for future meeting
2. Minutes
3. Ratification List
4. Inv. No. 731-TA-725 (Preliminary) (Manganese Sulfate from 
China)--briefing and vote.
5. Outstanding action jackets: none

    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    Issued: January 4, 1995.

    By order of the Commission:
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-543 Filed 1-5-95; 2:26 pm]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00088-CR

Jamario Bernard Pickett

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From Criminal District Court No. 4

of Tarrant County (1328362D)

April 3, 2014

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF WASHINGTON,

Respondent,

v.

CHRISTAPHER WHITE,

Appellant.

No. 73403-2-

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

FILED: August 1,2016 CO

C/1

COf-;-

cr\ ^cr

33- —-K "" _'

cr m

zn

i

^£tTM '-r-. iC/>f*Tf '

pr

Ot.o

-H f-,

o —

Verellen, C.J. — For the first time on appeal, Christapher White argues that as

applied to an indigent defendant, imposition of the mandatory deoxyribonucleic acid

(DNA) fee under RCW 43.43.7541 violates substantive due process.1 In State v.

Shelton, we considered and rejected the same argument.2 We held that until the State

attempts to enforce collection of the DNAfee or impose sanctions for failure to pay, the

claim is not ripe for judicial review and is not an error of constitutional magnitude subject

to review under RAP 2.5(a)(3).3 We also held that "unlike discretionary legal financial

obligations, the legislature unequivocally requires imposition of the mandatory DNA fee

1A jury convicted White of one count of assault in the second degree, two counts

of rape in the second degree, and one count of unlawful imprisonment.

2 No. 72848-2-I, 2016 WL 3461164, at *1 (Wash. Ct. App. June 20, 2016).

3 Id. at *4.
No. 73403-2-1/2

... at sentencing without regard to finding the ability to pay."4 We adhere to our

decision in Shelton.

Because the numerous issues listed in the statement of additional grounds do

not inform us of the "nature and occurrence of the alleged errors," we cannot review

them.5 Some of those issues were already considered and rejected by this court in

White's direct appeal.6 Any of those issues remaining that involve facts and evidence

not in the record on appeal are properly raised through a personal restraint petition, not

a statement of additional grounds.7

We affirm the judgment and sentence.

WE CONCUR:

A^/Wyw. V1

4|d, at *6.

5 State v. Alvarado. 164 Wn.2d 556, 569, 192 P.3d 345 (2008) (citing

RAP 10.10(c)).

6 State v. White, noted at 184 Wn. App. 1025, at *9-10 & 12 n.15 (2014).

7 Alvarado, 164 Wn.2d at 569.