alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3694 

To prohibit the Department of Homeland Security from requiring vaccination 

against COVID–19 for essential critical infrastructure workers crossing 

the border, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 17, 2022 

Mr. WICKER (for himself and Mr. DAINES) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Department of Homeland Security from requiring vaccination against COVID–19 for essential critical infrastructure workers crossing the border, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Continuing Safe Es5 sential Travel Across our Border Act of 2022’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3694 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON REQUIRING VACCINATION 

2 AGAINST COVID–19 FOR ESSENTIAL CRITICAL 

3 INFRASTRUCTURE WORKERS CROSSING THE 

4 BORDER. 

5 The Department of Homeland Security, and any 

6 component of the Department of Homeland Security, may 

7 not require an essential critical infrastructure worker to 

8 be vaccinated against COVID–19 as a condition to engage 

9 in essential travel— 

10 (1) from the United States to Mexico or Can11 ada; or 

12 (2) into the United States from Mexico or Can13 ada. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan

December 13, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 131854 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 131854 COA: 267481 Lapeer CC: 00-007103-FC JEFFREY ALAN MAXON, SR., Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 26, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered. We DIRECT the Lapeer County Prosecuting Attorney to answer the application for leave to appeal within 28 days after the date of this order. The prosecutor shal l pay particular attention to the defendant’s contention that the Lapeer Circuit Court se ntenced him under the judicial sentencing guidelines rather than under the applicable legislative sentencing guidelines, MCL 777.1 et seq

.
The application for leave to appeal remains pending.

K ELLY , J., would remand this case for resentencing.

p1206 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 13, 2006

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         899,327
<SECURITIES>                                50,276,402
<RECEIVABLES>                                  135,819
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         164,303
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              51,806,597
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     41,513,980
<COMMON>                                     8,453,059
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                51,806,597
<SALES>                                      4,226,287
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,580,323
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,550,704
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,824,922
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             10,204,697
<INCOME-TAX>                                   312,750
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            891,947
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   891,947
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.24
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Lincare Holdings Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul G. Gabos, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge
and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|(1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|By: |  | /s/ PAUL G. GABOSPaul G.
Gabos Chief Financial Officer
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------



March 8, 2006


---
Document

EXHIBIT 10.1



Amendment Two to the 
Service Corporation International 
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan for Senior Officers


            Service Corporation International (the “Company”), hereby adopts the following Amendment Two to the Service Corporation International Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan for Senior Officers as amended and restated on January 1, 1998 and further amended as of January 1, 2001 (the “Plan”):


WHEREAS, the Company previously adopted the Plan for the benefit of its key employees; 


WHEREAS, benefit accruals under the Plan ceased on December 31, 2000 and, as a result, the Plan is classified as a “grandfathered plan” for purposes of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Section 409A”);


WHEREAS, the Company previously amended the Plan’s terms to cause the Plan to satisfy the requirements of Section 409A with respect to participants for whom a “material amendment” occurs for purposes of Section 409A and Treasury Regulations Section 1.409A-6(a)(4), causing the accrued benefit for such participants to become subject to Section 409A; and
WHEREAS, the Company has determined it is prudent to adopt a new form of payment for participants who are active employees, causing that portion of the Plan to be subject to Section 409A;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of the date hereof, as follows:


            A.        Section 3.2 of the Plan is hereby amended to add a new Section 3.2(f), to be and to read in its entirety as follows:


“(f)      2022 Fixed Payment Date.  The Retirement Benefit payable to each Participant who is actively employed by the Company on December 1, 2022 shall be paid as a single lump sum payment during the period between December 21, 2022 and December 31, 2022.  For purposes of this provision, the amount of this lump sum payment shall be calculated as the present value of the Participant’s remaining monthly Retirement Benefit payments for the period commencing on or after November 30, 2022 and shall be calculated based on an interest rate of 4.15%.” 


            B.         Nothing in this Agreement or Appendix A is intended to alter, change, modify, or otherwise amend the Plan’s terms with respect to the remaining participants or to cause a loss of “grandfathered plan” status with respect to their accrued benefits.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, duly authorized officer of the Company, has caused this Amendment Two to be executed on this 21st day of December, 2022.


                                                            SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL 


                                                            By:       /s/ Gregory T. Sangalis                                     


Its:       Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 43 (Monday, March 6, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 12215]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5326]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-171-000]


Stingray Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

February 28, 1995.
    Take notice that on February 23, 1995, Stingray Pipeline Company 
(Stringray), tendered for filing to be a part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Third Revised Volume No. 1, First Revised Sheet No. 119, with a 
proposed effective date of March 25, 1995.
    Stingray states that the purpose of the filing is to modify the 
first-of-the-month deadline of its Tariff to permit nominations up 
until 11:59 p.m. of the second business day preceding the first day of 
the month.
    Stingray requested waiver of the Commission's Regulations to the 
extent necessary to permit the above tariff sheet to become effective 
March 25, 1995.
    Stingray states that a copy of the filing was mailed to Stingray's 
jurisdictional transportation customers and interested state regulatory 
agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., 385.211 or 
385.214 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or 
protests should be filed on or before March 7, 1995. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the public reference room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-5326 Filed 3-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals** 
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

CENTRIPETAL NETWORKS, INC., Appellant

v.

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., Appellee

______________________

2020

- 1634, 2020

- 1829

______________________

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No s . IPR2018

- 01386, IPR2018

- 01512.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

J AMES R. H ANNAH

, Kramer Levin Naftalis & FrankelLLP, Menlo Park, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by P AUL J. A NDRE ; J EFFREY P RICE , New York, NY.

J EFFREY B LAKE

, Merchant & Gould PC, Atlanta, GA, argued for appe llee. Also represented by D ANIEL W.

M C D ONALD , Minneapolis, MN ; M ICHAEL W AGNER , Denver,

CO

.

______________________ Case: 20-1634 Document: 52 Page: 1 Filed: 05/11/2021T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (P ROST

, Chief Judge

, L OURIE and

R EYNA

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

May 11, 2021

Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court Case: 20-1634 Document: 52 Page: 2 Filed: 05/11/2021
### Proposed Provision: B1.1. Price indexing of PIA factors beginning with those newly eligible for OASDI benefits in 2030: Reduce factors so that initial benefits grow by inflation rather than by the SSA average wage index.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001058952
<NAME> YOUNG AMERICA HOLDINGS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           8,188
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,696
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        639
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,382
<PP&E>                                          19,846
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,070
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,258
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,531
<BONDS>                                         80,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,871
<OTHER-SE>                                    (66,139)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,258
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,640
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   50,701
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,478
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,259)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (836)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,423)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,423)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                       JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                               113,284
<SECURITIES>                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                        10,237,706
<ALLOWANCES>                         186,220
<INVENTORY>                          449,735
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     11,178,514
<PP&E>                               68,194,694
<DEPRECIATION>                       15,796,843
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       63,576,365
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                18,874,301
<BONDS>                              0
<COMMON>                             18,537
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
<PREFERRED>                          0
<OTHER-SE>                           8,962,047
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         63,576,365
<SALES>                              80,479,766
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     80,479,766
<CGS>                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     78,089,799
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     141,485
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   3,686,567
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (1,438,085)
<INCOME-TAX>                         (546,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  (892,085)
<DISCONTINUED>                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0
<CHANGES>                            0
<NET-INCOME>                         (892,085)
<EPS-BASIC>                        (.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                        (.49)


</TABLE>
## NUMBER 13

- 2 2

- 00 590

- CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, A ppellant

,

v.

OMAR GERARDO HERNANDEZ

, A ppellee

.

On a ppeal from County Court at Law No. 2

of Cameron County, Texas.



## ORDER

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justice s Longoria and Silva

Order Per Curiam

Appellant, the State of Texas, by and through the District Attorney for Cameron

County, Texas, has filed a motion for stay of proceedings in the above cause. On

November 29 , 2022 , the trial court granted a motion to suppress in ca use number 1 7

-

CCR

- 1281

- B

.

The State has filed a notice of appeal in this cause and now request s that all further2 proceedings be stayed pending disposition of its appeal. See T EX

. C ODE C RIM

. P ROC

. A NN

.

art. 44.01 (e)

. The Court, having examined and fully considered the motion for stay of

proceedings, is of the opinion that said motion should be granted. The motion for stay is

hereby granted , and all trial court proceedings in this cause are ordered stayed pending

disposition of the State’s appeal.

PER CURIAM

Do not publis h.

T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed on the 11th day of January, 2023.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM APPLICABLE
1996 INTERIM  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF CELLULAR  COMMUNICATIONS  OF PUERTO RICO,
INC. THE  SCHEDULE IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                   JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                     JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                             3,142,000
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     21,677,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (3,710,000)
<INVENTORY>                                        4,776,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   4,569,000
<PP&E>                                           115,472,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (31,693,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   279,790,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             23,123,000
<BONDS>                                           95,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                             134,000
<OTHER-SE>                                       161,533,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     279,790,000
<SALES>                                            6,125,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  63,190,000
<CGS>                                              8,838,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     16,862,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  30,201,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 3,495,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    3,528,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (2,487,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                1,041,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                       1,041,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           0.08<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0.07<F1>

<FN>
<F1>RESTATED TO REFLECT THE ADOPTION OF STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
    STANDARDS NO.128, "EARNINGS PER SHARE"
</FN>

</TABLE>
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3773 

To authorize leases of up to 99 years for land held in trust for the 

Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 8 (legislative day, MARCH 7), 2022 

Ms. CANTWELL (for herself and Mrs. MURRAY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

A BILL 

To authorize leases of up to 99 years for land held in 

trust for the Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE CHEHALIS 

4 RESERVATION LEASING AUTHORITY. 

5 Subsection (a) of the first section of the Act of Au6 gust 9, 1955 (69 Stat. 539, chapter 615; 25 U.S.C. 

7 415(a)), is amended, in the second sentence, by inserting 

8 ‘‘, land held in trust for the Confederated Tribes of the 

9 Chehalis Reservation’’ after ‘‘Crow Tribe of Montana’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-11513

Wanhua Chemical US Operations, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
2                    b. Facsimile Signatures. This Amendment may be executed by facsimile. Facsimilesignatures shall be deemed effective for all purposes.                    c. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts andeach such counterpart shall be deemed an original, but all of which, when taken together, shallconstitute one and the same agreement.                    d. Capitalized Terms. All capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this Amendmentshall have the same meanings herein as are given to them in the Agreement.                    e. Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed and enforced inaccordance with the internal laws of the State of Delaware, without regard to conflict of lawsprinciples.          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment effective as of the datefirst above written.           EXECUTIVE:        /s/ Thomas F. Hewitt             Thomas F. Hewitt             COMPANY:                 INTERSTATE HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.               By:/s/ Christopher L. Bennett             Name:  Christopher L. Bennett      Title: Executive Vice President and General Counsel             LLC:                 INTERSTATE MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC               By:  Interstate Operating Company, L.P., a member                 By: Interstate Hotels & Resorts, Inc.,       its general partner               By:/s/ Christopher L. Bennett             Name: Christopher L. Bennett      Title: Executive Vice President and General Counsel