Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 39 / Tuesday, February 28, 1995 / Notices 10845

1Standards of Conduct and Reporting

Requirements for Transportation and Affiliate

Transactions, Order No. 566, 59 FR 32885 (June 27,

1994), III FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 30,997 (June 17,

1994); Order No. 566–A, order on rehearing, 59 FR

52896 (October 20, 1994), 69 FERC ¶ 61,044

(October 14, 1994); Order No. 566–B, order on

rehearing, 59 FR 65707, (December 21, 1994); 69

FERC ¶ 61,334 (December 14, 1994); appeal

docketed sub nom. Conoco, Inc. v. FERC, D.C. Cir.

No. 94–1745 (December 13, 1994).

appropriate action to be taken, but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceeding. Any person wishing to

become a party must file a motion to

intervene. Copies of this filing are on

file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection in the

Public Reference Room.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–4818 Filed 2–27–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. MG95–5–000]

Viking Gas Transmission Company;

Notice of Filing

February 22, 1995.

Take notice that on February 15, 1995,

Viking Gas Transmission Company

(Viking) filed revised standards of

conduct to reflect changes mandated by

Order Nos. 566 and 566–A.1

Viking states that copies of its filing

were mailed to each of Viking’s

customers and to interested state

commissions.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest said filing should file a motion

to intervene or protest with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 825

North Capitol Street, NE., Washington,

DC 20426, in accordance with Rule 211

or 214 of the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211

or 385.214). All such motions to

intervene or protest should be filed on

or before March 9, 1995. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–4819 Filed 2–27–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. CP93–541–004]

Young Gas Storage Company, Ltd.;

Notice of Petition To Amend

February 22, 1995.

Take notice that on February 17, 1995,

Young Gas Storage Company, Ltd.

(Young), P.O. Box 1087, Colorado

Springs, Colorado 80944, filed in Docket

No. CP93–541–004 an application to

amend the Order issued on June 22,

1994, in Docket Nos. CP93–541–000 and

CP93–541–001 by deleting two tracts of

land totaling 240 acres that were

previously included as protective

acreage and observation wells #4 and #6

located on the subject 240 acres, all as

more fully set forth in the petition to

amend which is on file with the

Commission and open to public

inspection.

Young states that upon further study,

it has determined that the storage

reservoir does not extend as far east as

originally thought and, accordingly, the

240 acres specified as protective acreage

and the two above-mentioned

observation wells located on the acreage

may be deleted. Young indicates that

the deletion of the acreage would help

to resolve certain disputes with an

affected landowner. Additionally,

Young states that the originally

proposed injection/withdrawal wells

#26, #28, and #31 will not be injection/

withdrawal wells. Instead, Young states

that wells #26 and #28 will be

observation wells and well #31 will be

a saltwater disposal well. Young claims

that the deletion of the protective

acreage will allow it to proceed with the

development of the Storage Field and to

perform the service that was authorized

by the Commission in Docket Nos.

CP93–541–000 and CP93–541–001.

Young finally asserts that there would

be a possibility that as the project

develops that further facts could arise

which would require Young to revise its

present judgment and to conclude that

acquisition of the subject acreage is

necessary to fulfill its duties under its

certificate. Young states that if this

would occur then it would request that

the Commission authorize Young to

acquire the acreage. Young states that it

reserves the right to make that filing

should it prove necessary.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

make any protests with reference to said

petition to amend should on or before

March 15, 1995, file with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission,

Washington, DC 20426, a motion to

intervene or a protest in accordance

with the requirements of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211)

and the Regulations under the Natural

Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). All protests

filed with the Commission will be

considered by it in determining the

appropriate action to be taken but will

not serve to make the protestants parties

to the proceeding. Any person wishing

to become a party to a proceeding or to

participate as a party in any hearing

therein must file a motion to intervene

in accordance with the Commission’s

Rules.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–4820 Filed 2–27–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

Office of Hearings and Appeals

Issuance of Decisions and Orders

During the Week of December 26

Through December 30, 1994

During the week of December 26

through December 30, 1994 the

decisions and orders summarized below

were issued with respect to applications

for exception or other relief filed with

the Office of Hearings and Appeals of

the Department of Energy. The

following summary also contains a list

of submissions that were dismissed by

the Office of Hearings and Appeals.

Requests for Exception

Farm, Fuel & Feed, 12/30/94, LEE–0164

Farm, Fuel & Feed filed an

Application for Exception from the

Energy Information Administration

(EIA) requirement that it file Form EIA–

782B, the ‘‘Resellers’/Retailers’ Monthly

Petroleum Product Sales Report.’’ In

considering this request, the DOE found

that the firm was not suffering gross

inequity or serious hardship.

Accordingly, on November 14, 1994, the

DOE issued a Proposed Decision and

Order tentatively determining that the

exception request should be denied. No

Notice of Objection to the Proposed

Decision and Order was filed at the

Office of Hearings and Appeals of the

DOE within the prescribed time period.

Therefore, the DOE issued the Proposed

Decision and Order in final form,

denying Farm, Fuel & Feed’s

Application for Exception.

Farmers Union Coop Oil Co., 12/27/94,

LEE–0162

Farmers Union Coop Oil Co.

(Farmers) filed an Application for

Exception from the Energy Information

Administration (EIA) requirement that it

file Form EIA–782B. The ‘‘Resellers’/

Retailers’ Monthly Petroleum Product

Sales Report.’’ In considering this

request, the DOE found that the firm