alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1728

EQI, Ltd: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Detailed Single Year Tables |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Cost-of-Living Adjustment | Description of Proposed Provision:      Beginning December 2009, reduce cost-of-living adjustment for OASDI benefits by 0.5 percentage point |
|---------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                           |

       Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program                Percentage of taxable payroll           Trust fundratio as ofJanuary 1CalendaryearCostrateIncomerateAnnualbalance 200811.2012.771.57 359200911.2612.811.54 369201011.3212.821.50 380201111.4312.841.40 390201211.6112.861.25 398201311.8312.891.06 403201412.0712.910.83 406201512.3212.930.60 408201612.5912.950.36 408201712.8612.970.11 406201813.1112.99-0.12 404201913.3713.00-0.36 399202013.6313.02-0.61 394202113.8713.04-0.83 388202214.1013.05-1.05 381202314.3213.07-1.26 373202414.5413.08-1.45 364202514.7413.10-1.64 354202614.9213.11-1.82 344202715.1013.12-1.98 333202815.2713.13-2.14 321202915.4313.14-2.28 308203015.5613.15-2.41 295203115.6713.16-2.51 282203215.7613.17-2.59 268203315.8213.17-2.65 255203415.8613.18-2.69 241203515.8913.18-2.71 227203615.9013.18-2.72 213203715.9013.18-2.71 199203815.8813.18-2.70 185203915.8513.18-2.67 171204015.8113.18-2.62 157204115.7613.18-2.58 142204215.7213.18-2.54 128204315.6813.18-2.50 114204415.6413.18-2.46 100204515.6013.18-2.42 86204615.5713.18-2.40 72204715.5513.18-2.37 58204815.5313.18-2.35 44204915.5113.18-2.33 29205015.5013.18-2.32 15205115.5013.18-2.32 0205215.5013.18-2.33 ----205315.5113.18-2.33 ----205415.5213.18-2.34 ----205515.5413.18-2.36 ----205615.5613.18-2.38 ----205715.5913.19-2.40 ----205815.6113.19-2.42 ----205915.6313.19-2.44 ----206015.6513.19-2.46 ----206115.6813.19-2.48 ----206215.7013.19-2.50 ----206315.7213.20-2.52 ----206415.7413.20-2.54 ----206515.7713.20-2.57 ----206615.7913.20-2.59 ----206715.8213.20-2.62 ----206815.8513.20-2.64 ----206915.8813.21-2.67 ----207015.9113.21-2.70 ----207115.9413.21-2.73 ----207215.9813.21-2.77 ----207316.0113.21-2.80 ----207416.0513.22-2.83 ----207516.0813.22-2.86 ----207616.1213.22-2.90 ----207716.1613.22-2.94 ----207816.2013.23-2.98 ----207916.2413.23-3.01 ----208016.2813.23-3.05 ----208116.3313.23-3.09 ----208216.3713.24-3.13 ----208316.4113.24-3.17 ----208416.4513.24-3.21 ----208516.4913.24-3.25 ----Summarized RatesYearsCostrateIncomerateActuarialbalance         Change inactuarialbalance Estimates based on the Intermediate Assumptions                         of the 2008 Trustees Report2008-208214.85%13.90%-0.95% 0.75% Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified August 11, 2008
- • X \a/R -S3 61/-o\ To ^-nuR-T *C tlll.\w\iMAL- APPEALS oF TgxAs

P,ft.P,frJr ll-\(s^s rAPlTnl <, TATiflus AusT/u, TiLkAS. 7 £ 7 / / APP/ (r a*j T /a&kY n*& ^nfi<m \/.^ STATE oF T'ExAs 

### RECEIVED W- ^ „ <r / COURTOFCRaiBNALAPPEAIS 

## ^ /»» 'A . NOV 09206"°+/") , /".k, 6rAoi>e.r 5 2oi<r\APPi tr AmT ) re.cLe.tv€Ld a Post CarA 

### Ina. J re-C^ivcA {APPLlCAAiTJfl.o~7 LUrH o-f //a/->eas dor^us 

## QnA f>re.S&M4<Lcl f-f -fe* 4A-d_ CLourr* ~Thi<> /s /a inquiry , k>e.c-auii£_ o^^-r jSO days Aas Z-4pp>£ / <am \r\^re-a)\itLtoQuj i/vau'tr'\ma of -hhfL SJa-t-US Or 

# ()iPPLlC*hiTs^ Af>p\ic.*V\C>N -For- llGl LUnf Of //^M5

Corpus , aKi cl 4-k-e- W[o\'\oi\i<> +/\tvf -Poiloio,, 

## (EXPLANATION (IE§U£3Je& )

^//^f /ft?, Z>1 

### (Apf>{fc**i+ Pro SeJ

TCt5# /2?V7z_6ZFtfr-f S-tec/Cfo*/ ~X 79 73ST
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-60032

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROGER CRAFT, also known as Sealed 

Defendant 7, also known as ROGERS CRAFT,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:97-CR-20-7

--------------------

February 22, 2000

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Rogers Craft argues that the admission of the testimony of

his coconspirators and other convicted felons violated 18 U.S.C.

§ 201(c)(2) because the Government promised the witnesses

leniency at their sentencings in return for their cooperation. 

This argument is foreclosed by the court’s decision in United

States v. Haese, 162 F.3d 359, 366-68 (5th Cir. 1998), cert.

denied, 119 S. Ct. 1795 (1999), as appellant concedes. This

issue is frivolous. 

Craft also argues that the district court erred in denying
No. 99-60032

-2-

his motion for a judgment of acquittal because the verdict was

against the overwhelming credible evidence presented at trial.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the

verdict, a rational trier of fact could have found beyond a

reasonable doubt that Craft was engaged in a conspiracy to

possess cocaine with the intent to distribute. The testimony of

his coconspirators and other witnesses that they supplied or

purchased large amounts of cocaine for street distribution from

Craft was corroborated by Craft’s phone records, by Craft’s

inconsistent statements given to law enforcement agents when he

was found in possession of a large amount of cash in an airport,

and by the evidence that a drug dog alerted to the cash. The

district court did not err in denying the motion for a judgment

of acquittal.

Craft argues that the amount of drugs attributed to him for 

sentencing purposes was based on grossly incorrect information

contained in the presentence report (PSR). He argues that he

challenged the information in the PSR and that the Government’s

proof presented at the sentencing hearing was suspect. 

Craft has not provided the court with the transcript of his

sentencing hearing. Craft had the responsibility to provide this

court with the portions of the record relevant for the

determination of his appeal. Powell v. Estelle, 959 F.2d 22, 26

(5th Cir. 1992). Because Craft has failed to provide a record of

the sentencing hearing, this court declines to review his

challenge to his sentence. See United States v. Hinojosa, 958

F.2d 624, 632-33 (5th Cir. 1992).
No. 99-60032

-3-

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 46 (Thursday, March 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 12944]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5740]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-193-000]


Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Co.; Notice of Tariff Filing

March 3, 1995.
    Take notice that on March 1, 1995, Williston Basin Interstate 
Pipeline Company (Williston Basin), tendered for filing revised tariff 
sheets to its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1.
    Williston Basin states that the revised tariff sheets are being 
filed to make minor tariff modifications and housekeeping changes 
necessary to correct and clarify its tariff in light of experience 
gained since implementing Order Nos. 636, et seq. on November 1, 1993.
    Williston Basin is requesting that the tariff sheets be made 
effective on April 1, 1995.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before March 10, 1995. All 
such protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party to the 
proceeding must file a motion to intervene. Copies of the filing are on 
file with the Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-5740 Filed 3-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 40 (Wednesday, March 1, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11114-11115]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4927]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--the Development of the Face Gear Technology for 
Industrial and Aerospace Power Transmission Program Team

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 21, 1994, pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), McDonnell Douglas 
Helicopter Company (doing business as McDonnell Douglas Helicopter 
Systems) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the 
identities of the parties and (2) the nature and objectives of a 
cooperative arrangement known as the ``Development of Face Gear 
Technology for Industrial and Aerospace Power Transmission Team (``FG/
ST'')''. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the 
provisions of the Act limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to section 6(b) 
of the Act, the identities of the parties are McDonnell Douglas 
Helicopter Systems, Mesa, AZ; and Lucas Western Incorporated, Park 
City, UT. The purpose of FG/ST is to pursue a coordinated research and 
development effort which will support and stimulate advance research 
and lead to the development of ``Face Gear Technology 
[[Page 11115]] for Industrial and Aerospace Power Transmission''.
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 95-4927 Filed 2-28-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3874 

To amend section 7 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to ensure 

appropriate compensation for certain hours of overtime work by border 

patrol agents. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 17, 2022 

Mr. CORNYN (for himself, Ms. SINEMA, Mr. LANKFORD, and Mr. KELLY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend section 7 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 

1938 to ensure appropriate compensation for certain 

hours of overtime work by border patrol agents. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Border Patrol Pay Se5 curity Act of 2022’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PURPOSE. 

7 The purposes of this Act are— 

8 (1) to strengthen U.S. Customs and Border 

9 Protection; and 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3874 IS

1 (2) to ensure that border patrol agents are 

2 compensated with premium pay for certain hours of 

3 overtime work. 

4 SEC. 3. FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT OF 1938 PREMIUM 

5 PAY FOR BORDER PATROL AGENTS. 

6 Section 7 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 

7 (29 U.S.C. 207) is amended by adding at the end the fol8 lowing: 

9 ‘‘(s) EMPLOYMENT AS A BORDER PATROL AGENT.— 

10 No public agency shall be deemed to have violated sub11 section (a) with respect to the employment of any border 

12 patrol agent (as defined in section 5550(a)(2) of title 5, 

13 United States Code), if, during a work period of 14 con14 secutive days, the border patrol agent receives compensa15 tion at a rate not less than 150 percent of the regular 

16 rate at which the border patrol agent is employed for all 

17 hours of work between 80 hours and 100 hours. Payments 

18 required under this subsection shall be in addition to any 

19 payments made under section 5550 of title 5, United 

20 States Code, and shall be made notwithstanding any pay 

21 limitations set forth in that title.’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3874 IS

1 SEC. 4. TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT. 

2 Section 13(a) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 

3 1938 (29 U.S.C. 213(a)) is amended by striking para4 graph (18). 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Southeast Watershed Research: Tifton, GA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Scientific Partnerships
                        Long Term Agriculture Research Network (LTAR)
                                    GA Coastal Plain LTAR
                                    NRCS Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP)
                                    Southeast Biomass Research Center
                    About Us
                        History & Program
                                    Business Partnerships
                                    Models
                                    Public DataSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Tifton, Georgia Southeast Watershed Research Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Research Projects Subjects of Investigation at this LocationEach ARS research project has related subjects of investigation.  Listed below are the subjects of investigation currently conducted at this location.
Clicking on a subject of investigation will list the research projects within that  subject of investigation.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-11473

Trio Engineered Products:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXHIBIT 31.1CERTIFICATIONI, Robert Netolicka, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MSX International, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) designed such internal controls over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal controls over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting andthe preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisquarterly report based on such evaluation; and  d) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: May 17, 2006/s/ Robert Netolicka
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-1823

GHL International, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel