alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 7, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12564-12565]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5465]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE


Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board

AGENCY: General Accounting Office.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a 
two-day meeting of the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board will 
be held on Wednesday afternoon, March 15 from 1:00 to 4:30 and 
continuing on Thursday, March 16 from 9:00 A.M. to 4:00 in room 7C13 of 
the General Accounting Office, 441 G St., N.W., Washington, D.C.
    The agenda for the meeting includes discussions of issues related 
to the following projects: Stewardship, Revenue Recognition, 
Liabilities, and Managerial Cost Accounting Standards.
    We advise that other items may be added to the agenda; interested 
parties should contact the Staff Director for more specific information 
and to confirm the date of the meeting. Any interested person may 
attend the meeting as an observer. Board discussions and reviews are 
open to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ronald S. Young, Executive Staff Director, 750 First St., N.E., Room 
1001, Washington, D.C. 20002, or call (202) 512-7350.

    Authority: Federal Advisory Committee Act. Pub. L. No. 92-463, 
Section 10(a)(2), 86 Stat. 770, 774 (1972) (current version at 5 
U.S.C. app. section 10(a)(2) (1988); 41 CFR 101-6.1015 (1990).

    [[Page 12565]] Dated: March 1, 1995.
Ronald S. Young,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 95-5465 Filed 3-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610-01-M
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

 2009-1541 

 MTS SYSTEMS CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v. 

HYSITRON INCORPORATED, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

Nicholas S. Boebel, Myers, Boebel & MacLeod L.L.P., of Minneapolis, Minnesota, 

argued for plaintiff-appellee. 

David P. Pearson, Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A., of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued 

for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were Thomas H. Boyd and Brent A. Lorentz. 

Appealed from: United States District Court for the District of Minnesota 

Chief Judge Michael J. Davis 

 
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

 2009-1541 

MTS SYSTEMS CORPORATION, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v. 

HYSITRON INCORPORATED, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

 Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota 

in CASE NO(S). 06-CV-3853 

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

Per Curiam (LOURIE, RADER, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges). 

 AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

DATED April 8, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 28, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 10843]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4807]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP94-416-000]


Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Technical Conference

February 22, 1995.
    In the Commission's order issued February 15, 1995, the Commission 
held that the filing in the above captioned proceeding raises issues 
that should be addressed in a technical conference. Take notice that 
the technical conference will be held on Thursday, March 23, 1995, at 
2:00 p.m., in a room to be designated at the offices of the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 810 First Street, N.E., Washington D.C. 
20426. All interested parties and Staff are permitted to attend.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-4807 Filed 2-27-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

August 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1556

Illinois Tool Works:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 13

- 00345

- CR

Silvia Gallegos NEIRA

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR2665

Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE MARION , AND JUSTICE BARNARD

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, this appeal is

DISMISSED. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d).

SIGNED September 25, 2013.

_____________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice
Exhibit 23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-54398, 333-07515,333-43547, 333-56697, 333-32118, 333-62714, 333-116431 and 333-134938 on Form S-8 and Nos.333-96369, 333-116155, 333-132151 and 333-133636 on Form S-3 of PowerSecure International, Inc.(f.k.a. Metretek Technologies, Inc. and Marcum Natural Gas Services, Inc.) of our reports datedMarch 14, 2008 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion) on the consolidated financialstatements of PowerSecure International, Inc. and on PowerSecure International, Inc.’s internalcontrol over financial reporting, and our report dated March 14, 2008 (which report expresses anunqualified opinion) on the financial statements of Marcum Midstream 1995-2 Business Trust,appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of PowerSecure International, Inc. for the year endedDecember 31, 2007./s/ Hein & Associates LLPHEIN & ASSOCIATES LLPDenver, Colorado
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 7, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12549-12550]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5473]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP92-133-004 (Phase I)]


Gas Research Institute; Petition to Continue the Current Funding 
Mechanism Through 1997

March 1, 1995.
    Take notice that on February 27, 1995, Gas Research Institute 
(GRI), filed a petition requesting expedited approval of its proposal 
to continue the current funding mechanism for purposes of 1996 and 1997 
GRI funding.
    GRI proposes that the provisions of the post-1993 funding 
mechanism, [[Page 12550]] which has been applicable to GRI's 1994 and 
1995 Research and Development (R&D) Programs, be continued through 
1997. Under GRI's proposal, the funding surcharge caps previously 
approved for 1995 would be used for 1996 and 1997 funding, with demand 
and volumetric caps of 25.5 cents per Dth per month and 1.1 cents per 
Dth, respectively, allowed to track any increases the Commission may 
approve in GRI's 1996 and 1997 R&D budgets.
    GRI also proposes to add its new pipeline member to the list of 
pipelines that will be acting as collection agents for GRI funding.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest GRI's petition should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 
20426, in accordance with Rules 214 and 211 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.214 and 385.211. All protests, 
motions to intervene and comments should be filed on or before March 
15, 1995. All comments and protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to this proceeding. Copies of 
this petition are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-5473 Filed 3-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1084

ERIC MARIO BYERS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

UNITED STATES ex rel. $12,642.00 United States

Currency, 1993 Mazda RX7 (VIN:

JM1FD3312P0207844), 1993 Mazda 929 (VIN:

JM1HD4611P0202550), 2001 Suzuki Motorcycle

(VIN: JS1GN7BA912102511),

Plaintiff,

versus

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; J. J. KOZLOWSKI,

Det. of the Commonwealth of Virginia; M. D.

SANDERSON, Det. of the Commonwealth of

Virginia; T. P. DUGAN, Det. of the

Commonwealth of Virginia; D. GUEVARA, Det. of

the Commonwealth of Virginia; J. J. MASSIE,

Det. of the Commonwealth of Virginia;

CORCORAN, Det. of the Commonwealth of

Virginia; JURACK, Det. of the Commonwealth of

Virginia; CALHOUN, Det. of the Commonwealth of

Virginia; STEWART, Det. of the Commonwealth of

Virginia; T. CARINI, Det. of the Commonwealth

of Virginia; N. C. THOMPSON, Lieutenant, Det.

of the Commonwealth of Virginia; HARVEY

BRYANT, III, Commonwealth Attorney of the

Commonwealth of Virginia,

Defendants - Appellees.
- 2 -

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-03-724-2)

Submitted: May 21, 2004 Decided: June 15, 2004

Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed in part, affirmed in part by unpublished per curiam

opinion.

Eric Mario Byers, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Eric Mario Byers appeals the district court’s judgment

and order denying his requests for a temporary restraining order

and a preliminary injunction and summarily dismissing his civil

rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we dismiss that part of the appeal

from the denial of a temporary restraining order. See Virginia v.

Tenneco, Inc., 538 F.2d 1026, 1029-30 (4th Cir. 1976). We affirm

the remainder of the district court’s order for the reasons stated

by the district court. See Byers v. Commonwealth, No. CA-03-724-2

(E.D. Va. Dec. 10, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED IN PART, AFFIRMED IN PART
#### FLORENCE HUDSON, Mother and JOE HUDSON, Father, Next-of-Kin of STANLEY HUDSON, Deceased Employee; Plaintiffs, v. WHITFORD MOTOR COMPANY, Employer and GREAT AMERICAN INDEMNITY COMPANY, Carrier; Defendants.

(Filed 17 September, 1958.)

*721Appeal by defendants from *Parker, J.,*May Civil Term, 1958, of CRAVEN.

Defendants’ appeal is from a judgment affirming the Industrial Commission’s award of compensation in a proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, G.S. Ch. 97, Art. 1.

Findings of fact and conclusions of law, made initially by the hearing Commissioner, together with award based thereon, were adopted, upon defendants’ appeal, by the full Commission; and, upon defendants’ further appeal, the court entered judgment affirming the award. Upon this appeal from said judgment, defendants assign as error the overruling of their exceptions to designated findings of fact and conclusions of law and the affirmance of the award.

*Wilkinson Ward for plaintiffs, appellees.*

*I. Weisner Farmer and White & Aycock by Harvey W. Marcus for defendants, appellants.*

Per Curiam.

The only question presented by defendants’ assignments of error is whether there is any competent evidence to support the full Commission’s findings of fact and conclusions of law to the effect that Stanley Hudson’s death on January 11, 1956, was by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment by Whitford Motor Company. After careful study of the record, we conclude that this question must be answered in the affirmative. Hence, the judgment must be and is affirmed. *Champion v. Tractor Co.,*246 N.C. 691, 99 S.E. 2d 917; *Watson v. Clay Co.,*242 N.C. 763, 89 S.E. 2d 465, and cases cited.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 41 (Thursday, March 2, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11664-11665]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5102]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-169-000]


KN Interstate Gas Transmission Co.; Notice of Filing

February 24, 1995.
    On February 21, 1995, KN Interstate Gas Transmission Co. (KNI), 
filed pursuant to Section 4 of the Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S.C. 717c, 
Sec. 154.63 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's 
(``Commission'') Regulations, 18 CFR 154.63, and the Commission's Order 
on Remand issued on December 22, 1994 in Docket Nos. CP93-41-004 and 
CP93-42-004 for authorization to terminate its non-jurisdictional 
gathering and processing services which it provided prior to January 1, 
1994--the date on which KNI transferred its non-jurisdictional 
gathering and processing facilities (except for the Bowdoin System) to 
KN Gas Gathering, Inc. (``KNGG''). KNI requests retroactive approval to 
January 1, 1994.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest the said filing 
should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, NE., Washington, D.C. 
20426, in accordance with Secs. 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests should be filed on 
or before March 6, 1995. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
[[Page 11665]] become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies 
of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-5102 Filed 3-1-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3942 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to prohibit the exclusion of individuals 

from service on a Federal jury on account of disability. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 29, 2022 

Mr. MARKEY (for himself, Mr. BROWN, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. CASEY, Ms. SMITH, 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Ms. WARREN, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, and Mr. PADILLA) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to prohibit the exclusion of individuals from service on a Federal jury on 

account of disability. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Disabled Jurors Non5 discrimination Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3942 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM FEDERAL JURIES ON ACCOUNT 

2 OF DISABILITY. 

3 (a) DISCRIMINATION PROHIBITED.—Section 1862 of 

4 title 28, United States Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘dis5 ability,’’ after ‘‘origin,’’. 

6 (b) QUALIFICATIONS FOR JURY SERVICE.—Section 

7 1865 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by add8 ing at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(c) No person may be disqualified from serving on 

10 grand and petit juries in the district court under para11 graph (2) or (3) of subsection (b) on account of dis12 ability.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 8, 2022

No. 04-22-00473-CR

EX PARTE Carlos Ulin GARCIA

From the County Court, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10297CR

Honorable Dennis Powell, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On December 2, 2022, the State filed an unopposed motion to consolidate, seeking 

consolidation of this case with seventeen others and for an extension of time to file its brief. We 

DENY the motion as to consolidation, but we GRANT the motion as to the extension of time and 

ORDER the State to file its brief by January 6, 2023. The State may file the same brief in 

multiple cases, if it so desires, by placing all appellate cause numbers in the style and by filing 

the brief separately in all cause numbers. Further requests for extensions of time will be 

disfavored.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 8th day of December, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
---

EXHIBIT 32.1





Certification of Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Clinton H. Severson, Chief Executive Officer of Abaxis, Inc. (the “Registrant”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Registrant at the end of the periods covered by the Report and results of operations of the Registrant for the periods covered by the Report.





Dated: June 13, 2011





By:
/s/ Clinton H. SeversonClinton H. SeversonPresident and Chief Executive Officer





This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 29 (Friday, February 12, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 7563]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02907]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4245-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2016-0001]


Texas; Amendment No. 3 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Texas (FEMA-4245-DR), dated November 25, 2015, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: January 29, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Texas is hereby amended to include the following area 
among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of 
November 25, 2015.

Smith County for Public Assistance

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2016-02907 Filed 2-11-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 2 , 2023

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 22

- 00847

- CV

FRED WYNN AND ELVIRA WYNN , Appellant s
V. TRIDENT GENERAL CONTRACTING, LLC , Appellee

On Appeal from the 61st District Court Harris County, Texa s Trial Court Cause No. 2019

- 20921

MEMORANDUM OPINION
This appeal is from a judgment signed October 20, 20 2 2 . No clerk’s record has been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant did not make arran gements to pay for the record.

On F e bruary 21, 20 2 3 , notification was transmitted to all parties of the
court’s intentio n to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). No2

response was filed. On Marc h 23 , 202 3 , appellant w as ordered to provide this court with proof of payment for the record on or before April 3, 202 3

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). I n the order, the court notified appellant that failure to comply with the court’s order would result in dismissal of the appeal. See T ex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). No response was filed.
Appellant has not provided this court with proof of payment for the reco rd. We dismiss the appeal

.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Z i mmerer, and Wilson.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Industrial Enterprises
      of
      America, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to
      such officer’s knowledge, that this Amendment No. 2 to the Company’s quarterly
      report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (this "Amendment
      No. 2”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
      contained in this Amendment No. 2 fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for,
      the
      period presented in this Amendment No. 2.




Date:**September
      18, 2006**


By: /s/
      John D. Mazzuto


John
      D. Mazzuto, Chief
      Executive Officer











The
      foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350 and is not being filed as part of this Amendment No. 2 or as a separate
      disclosure document.