Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 33 / Friday, February 17, 1995 / Notices 9329

Zurich, Switzerland, which, through

other subsidiaries, owns utility

generating facilities in Europe, financial

service providers and other entities.

Comment date: February 24, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

9. Gulfstream Energy, LLC

[Docket No. ER94–1597–001]

Take notice that on January 30, 1995,

Gulfstream Energy, LLC (Gulfstream)

filed information required by the

Commission’s November 21, 1994 letter

order in Docket No. ER94–1597–000.

Copies of Gulfstream’s informational

filing are on file with the Commission

and are available for public inspection.

Standard Paragraphs

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street N.E.,

Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance

with Rules 211 and 214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR

385.214). All such motions or protests

should be filed on or before the

comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–3980 Filed 2–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Docket No. ER93–327–002, et al.]

Florida Power & Light Co., et al.;

Electric Rate and Corporate Regulation

Filings

February 9, 1995.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Florida Power & Light Co.

[Docket No. ER93–327–002]

Take notice that on February 1, 1995,

Florida Power & Light Company (F&L),

tendered for filing its compliance refund

report in the above-referenced docket.

Comment date: February 23, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

2. Wisconsin Electric Power Co.

[Docket No. ER95–299–000]

Take notice that on February 1, 1995,

Wisconsin Electric Power Company

tendered for filing an amendment in the

above-referenced docket.

Comment date: February 23, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

3. Wickland Power Services

[Docket No. ER95–300–000]

Take notice that on February 6, 1995,

Wickland Power Services tendered for

filing an amendment in the abovereferenced docket.

Comment date: February 23, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

4. Allegheny Power Service Corp. on

behalf of Monongahela Power Co., and

the Potomac Edison Co.

[Docket No. ER95–468–000]

Take notice that on January 20, 1995,

Allegheny Power Service Corporation

on behalf of Monongahela Power

Company, The Potomac Edison

Company and West Penn Power

Company (The APS Companies), filed

Standard Transmission Service

Agreements to add AES Power, Inc.

PECO Energy and Electric

Clearinghouse, Inc. to The APS

Companies’ Standard Transmission

Service Rate Schedule which has been

accepted for filing by the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission. The proposed

effective date when customers may take

service under the proposed rate

schedule is January 2, 1995.

Copies of the filing have been

provided to the Public Utilities

Commission of Ohio, the Pennsylvania

Public Utility Commission, and the

West Virginia Public Service

Commission.

Comment date: February 23, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

5. Madison Gas and Electric Co.

[Docket No. ER95–494–000]

Take notice that on January 30, 1995,

Madison Gas and Electric Company

(MGE), tendered for filing a service

agreement with InterCoast Power

Marketing Company under MGE’s

Power Sales Tariff. MGE requests an

effective date of February 1, 1995.

Comment date: February 23, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

6. Kentucky Utilities Co.

[Docket No. ER95–529–000]

Take notice that on February 1, 1995,

Kentucky Utilities Company (KU),

tendered for filing a series of rate

schedule amendments to all of the

agreements under which KU makes

coordination sales in order to assure

recovery of the incremental cost of

emission allowances associated with

coordination sales.

Comment date: February 23, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street NE.,

Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance

with Rules 211 and 214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR

385.214). All such motions or protests

should be filed on or before the

comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–3979 Filed 2–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Project No. 2493–006–WA]

Puget Sound Power & Light Co; Notice

of Intent to Hold a Public Meeting in

Snoqualmie, Washington, and a Public

Meeting in Kirkland, Washington, to

Discuss Staff’s Draft Environmental

Impact Statement (DEIS) for the

Snoqualmie Falls Hydroelectric Project

February 13, 1995.

On November 15, 1994, the

Commission staff mailed the

Snoqualmie Falls DEIS to the

Environmental Protection Agency,

resource and land management

agencies, and interested organizations

and individuals. This documents

evaluates the environmental

consequences of operating the

applicant’s existing 42-megawatt (MW)

hydroelectric project, located on the

Snoqualmie River, approximately 25

miles east of Seattle in western

Washington.

The applicant proposes extensive

structural modifications of the existing

project facilities and construction of

additional project facilities needed to

expand the project from 42 MW to 72
9330 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 33 / Friday, February 17, 1995 / Notices

MW; hydraulic capacity would increase

from 2,500 to 3,620 cubic feet per

second.

The subject DEIS also evaluates the

environmental effects of: additional

flow options and supplemental

measures with the applicant’s proposal;

a minor upgrade; decommissioning the

project; and the no action alternative.

The public meetings on the

Snoqualmie Falls Project will be

recorded by an official stenographer.

The first meeting will be held from 6:30

P.M. to 11 P.M. on Wednesday, March

1, 1995, at the Mount Si High School in

Snoqualmie, Washington. The second

meeting will be held from 6:30 P.M. to

11 P.M. on Thursday, March 2, 1995, at

Lake Washington Technical College,

West Building 4th floor auditorium,

132nd Avenue N.E., Kirkland,

Washington.

At the subject meeting, resource

agency personnel and other interested

persons will have the opportunity to

provide oral and written comments and

recommendations regarding the

Snoqualmie Falls DEIS for the

Commission’s public record.

For further information, please

contact Kathleen Sherman, at (202) 219–

2834.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–3978 Filed 2–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. EL95–27–000]

CGE Fulton, L.L.C.; Notice of Filing

February 14, 1995.

Take notice that on February 13, 1995,

CGE Fulton, L.L.C. (‘‘CGE Fulton’’), filed

a petition for a declaratory order and

requested expedited treatment of the

petition. CGE Fulton states that it is

developing a waste-fired qualifying

small power production facility in the

City of Fulton, Illinois (‘‘Project’’). CGE

Fulton will sell electricity from the

Project at tariff rates prescribed by

Section 8–403.1 of the Illinois Public

Utilities Act and regulations of the

Illinois Commerce Commission. CGE

Fulton seeks a declaratory order that the

Illinois statute is not preempted by

PURPA, and thus, that the Project is not

affected by the Commission’s decision

in Connecticut Light & Power Co., 70

FERC ¶ 61,012 (January 11, 1995).

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest said filing should file a motion

to intervene or protest with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 825

North Capitol Street, NE, Washington,

D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules

211 and 214 of the Commission’s Rules

of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR

385.211, 384.214). All such motions or

protests should be filed on or before

February 28, 1995. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate actions to

be taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95– 4103 Filed 2–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. CP95–200–000]

Koch Gateway Pipeline Co.; Notice of

Request Under Blanket Authorization

February 13, 1995.

Take notice that on February 8, 1995,

Koch Gateway Pipeline Company

(Koch), P.O. Box 1478, Houston, Texas

77251–1478, filed in Docket No. CP95–

200–000 a request pursuant to Sections

157.205 and 157.211 of the

Commission’s Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act )18 CFR 157.205,

157.211) for authorization to install a

new tap in Jones County, Mississippi,

for service to an existing local

distribution company customer, Entex,

Inc. (Entex), under Koch’s blanket

certificate issued in Docket No. CP82–

430–000, pursuant to Section 7 of the

Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set

forth in the request that is on file with

the Commission and open to public

inspection

Koch proposes to construct and

operate interconnecting tap facilities for

service to Entex, which will deliver gas

to one agricultural customer in Jones

County. Koch states that the tap would

be used for the deliver of 84 MMBtu

equivalent of natural gas on a peak day,

transported by Koch under its FTS rate

schedule. It is stated that this volume is

with Entex’s existing certificated

entitlement from Koch. The cost of the

proposed tap is estimated at $800 and

Koch states that it would be reimbursed

by Entex for the construction cost. It is

stated that Koch’s tariff does not

prohibit the proposed addition of a

delivery tap. It is asserted that Koch as

sufficient capacity to make the

deliveries without detriment or

disadvantage to its other customers.

Any person or the Commission’s staff

may, with 45 days after issuance of the

instant notice by the Commission, file

pursuant to Rule 214 of the

Commission’s Procedural Rules (18 CFR

385.214) a motion to intervene or notice

of intervention and pursuant to Section

157.205 of the Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a

protest to the request. If no protest is

filed within the time allowed therefor,

the proposed activity shall be deemed to

be authorized effective the day after the

time allowed for filing a protest. If a

protest is filed and not withdrawn

within 30 days after the time allowed

for filing a protest, the instant request

shall be treated as an application for

authorization pursuant to Section 7 of

the Natural Gas Act.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–3977 Filed 2–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket Nos. ER95–267–000 and EL95–25–

000]

New England Power Co.; Notice of

Initiation of Proceeding and Refund

Effective Date

February 13, 1995.

Take notice that on February 9, 1995,

the Commission issued an order in the

above-indicated dockets initiating a

proceeding in Docket No. EL95–25–000

under section 206 of the Federal Power

Act.

The refund effective date in Docket

No. EL95–25–000 will be 60 days after

publication of this notice in the Federal

Register.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–4009 Filed 2–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

Office of Energy Efficiency and

Renewable Energy

[Case No. CD–001]

Energy Conservation Program for

Consumer Products: Decision and

Order Granting a Waiver from the

Clothes Dryer Test Procedures to Miele

Appliance Inc.

AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and

Renewable Energy, Department of

Energy.

ACTION: Decision and Order.

SUMMARY: Notice is given of the

Decision and Order (Case No. CD–001)

granting a Waiver to Miele Appliance

Incorporated (Miele) from the existing

Department of Energy (DOE or

Department) test procedure for clothes

dryers. The Department is granting

Miele a Waiver from the Department’s

test procedures for its condenser clothes