alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 6 (Tuesday, January 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2618-2619]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-470]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 2619]]

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster Loan Area #2756; amendment #2]


Florida; Declaration of Disaster Loan Area

    The above-numbered Declaration is hereby amended, effective 
December 28, 1994, to include Brevard County in the State of Florida as 
a primary disaster area as a result of damages caused by Tropical Storm 
Gordon beginning on November 14, 1994 and continuing through November 
28, 1994.
    In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small 
businesses located in the contiguous counties of Indian River, Orange, 
and Osceola in the State of Florida may be filed until the specified 
date at the previously designated location.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the termination date 
for filing applications for physical damage is January 26, 1995 and for 
economic injury the deadline is August 28, 1995.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008.)

    Dated: December 29, 1994.
Bernard Kulik,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-470 Filed 1-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         2,081,770
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          860,508
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                     576,575
<MORTGAGE>                                      44,427
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               3,987,273
<CASH>                                       4,202,351
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                           2,306,372
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                       1,246,555
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,345,051
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              3,220,457
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                          3,749,945
<POLICY-OTHER>                               1,114,267
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                              2,330,588
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,763
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,345,051
<PREMIUMS>                                   7,533,684
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            377,218
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                           (437,565)
<OTHER-INCOME>                               1,537,040
<BENEFITS>                                   2,648,074
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  2,252,195
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         4,313,278
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (321,409)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (321,409)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (321,409)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in thefollowing Registration Statements:

(1)   Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos. 333-52471,333-62309, 333-77543, 333-81481, 333-84487, 333-85673, 333-30938, 333-72798,333-72800, 333-107538 and 333-38773) of SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and

(2)   Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-66832,333-12169, 333-62059, 333-45820, 333-98081, 333-109256 and 333-120008) pertaining tothe 1991 Stock Plan, the 1992 Stock Plan, the 1995 Equity Incentive Plan, the1995 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, the 1996 Employee Stock PurchasePlan, the 2004 Stock Option Plan and the 2004 Outside Directors Stock OptionPlan of SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,

of our reports dated March 10, 2005, with respect to theconsolidated financial statements and schedule of SciClone Pharmaceuticals,Inc.,SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Inc.management'sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of SciClonePharmaceuticals, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the yearended December 31, 2004. 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP               
Palo Alto, California
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

    Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
          Relating to a Periodic Report Containing Financial Statements


     I, John R. Plachetka, Pharm.D., Chief Executive Officer, and I, Matthew E.
Czajkowski, Chief Financial Officer, of POZEN Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), hereby certify that, to my knowledge:

     (1) The Company's periodic report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
31, 2003 (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                      * * *


CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER                     CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


/s/ John R. Plachetka                       /s/ Matthew E. Czajkowski
------------------------------              -----------------------------------
John R. Plachetka, Pharm.D.                 Matthew E. Czajkowski

Date: May 12, 2003                          Date: May 12, 2003
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 -0.09 -0.01 -3% -0%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

August 1, 2023

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Taxation of Benefits

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: H4. Increase the threshold for taxation of OASDI benefits to $50,000 for single filers 

and $100,000 for joint filers starting in 2025. Taxation of benefits revenues transferred to the Hospital 

Insurance (HI) Trust Fund would be the same as if the current-law computation applied.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision
**Exhibit 31.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES**
 **13A-14 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF**
 **THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 I, Crawford Shaw, the Chief Executive Officer (the principal executive officer) of Industrial Enterprises of America, Inc., certify that:
 
 1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Industrial Enterprises of America, Inc.; 
 2.
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 
 3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 
 4.
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 
 a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; and 
 b.
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation. 
 5.
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 
 a.
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 
 b.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 
 6.
The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. 
 
 
 
 Dated:  December 30, 2004
 
 /s/Crawford Shaw
 Crawford Shaw, Chief Executive Officer,
 Chairman of the Board and President
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

August 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1559

Illinois Tool Works:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 75th 

Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

-2.00% -4.34% -0.07% -0.07% -2.07% -4.41%

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Family Members

Proposed Provision: Beginning in 2010, continue benefits for children of disabled or deceased workers 

until age 22 if the child is in high school, college or vocational school.

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this provision

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Cost rates with this provision

Income rates under present law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under present law

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Present law With this provision

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2009 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary, Social Security

November 4, 2009

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Cost rates with this provision

Income rates under present law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under present law

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Present law With this provision
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 18-0670

IN THE MATTER OF:

H.E.B.K.,

Respondent and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion to voluntarily dismiss 

appeal and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant’s appeal in the above 

matter is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 24 2020

06/24/2020

Case Number: DA 18-0670
1

09-1609-pr

Brown v. Raimondo

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

SUMMARY ORDER

Rulings by summary order do not have precedential effect. Citation to a summary order

filed on or after January 1, 2007, is permitted and is governed by Federal Rule of Appellate

Procedure 32.1 and this court’s LocalRule 32.1.1.When citing a summary orderin a document filed

with this court, a party must cite either the Federal Appendix or an electronic database (with the

notation “summary order”). A party citing a summary order must serve a copy of it on any party

not represented by counsel. 

At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the

Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, in the City of New York, on

the 21 day of April, two thousand ten. st

PRESENT:

ROGER J. MINER,

JOSÉ A. CABRANES,

RICHARD C. WESLEY,

Circuit Judges.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x

ANTONIO BROWN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 -v.- No. 09-1609-pr

SERGEANT RAIMONDO, D. WELLS, C.O., R. WALDMAN, C.O., R. ZIMMERMAN, C.O.,

Defendants-Appellees. 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x

COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT: Antonio Brown, pro se, Alden, NY. 

COUNSEL FOR APPELLEES: Robert M. Goldfarb, Assistant Solicitor General 

(Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General of the State of

New York; Barbara D. Underwood, Solicitor General;

Nancy A. Spiegel, Senior Assistant Solicitor General, of

counsel) Albany, NY.

Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New
2

York (Glenn T. Suddaby, Judge).

UPON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED,

AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.

Plaintiff Antonio Brown appeals from the March 25, 2009 judgment of the District Court

denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and granting defendants’ motion for summary

judgment. On appeal, plaintiff argues that the District Court erred in concluding that there was no

question of material fact as to whether defendants violated plaintiff’s rights under the Eighth

Amendment and that defendants were entitled to judgment as a matter of law. We assume the parties’

familiarity with the facts and procedural history of this case.

We have reviewed each of plaintiff’s claims and find them to be without merit. Substantially for

the reasons stated by Magistrate Judge Randolph S. Treece in his careful and thoughtful report and

recommendation of February 25, 2009, see Brown v. Raimondo, 06-CV-0773 (N.D.N.Y. February 25,

2009), which the District Court adopted, see Brown v. Raimondo, 06-CV-0773 (N.D.N.Y. March 25, 2009),

the March 25, 2009 judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED. 

FOR THE COURT, 

Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1745

Advantest America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 01-10191

Summary Calendar

____________________

ARDELL NELSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE; TEXAS

DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE - INSTITUTIONAL

DIVISION OFFICIALS,

Defendants-Appellees.

____________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(2:00-CV-231)

____________________________________________________________

May 18, 2001

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ardell Nelson (Texas prisoner #482188) appeals the dismissal

of his civil rights action, without prejudice, for failure to

prosecute. The dismissal order stated that Nelson had failed to

comply with a deficiency notice, which instructed him to sign and

return his complaint prior to a 30-day deadline expiring in early

January 2001. 
2

The district court’s docket sheet, however, contains the

following 12 December 2000 entry: “Received signed complaint from

plaintiff Nelson in response to deficiency order dated 12/7/00.

Copy forwarded to chambers”. Moreover, the complaint in the record

on appeal is signed by Nelson and dated 12 December 2000. Because

the record indicates Nelson timely complied with the deficiency

notice, we conclude that the district court abused its discretion

in dismissing the complaint. See McCullough v. Lynaugh, 835 F.2d

1126, 1127 (5th Cir. 1988). Accordingly, we VACATE the final

judgment and REMAND the case to the district court for further

proceedings consistent with this opinion.

VACATED and REMANDED
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 7, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 12396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5452]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Part 532

RIN 3206-AG44


Prevailing Rate Systems; Abolishment of Cook, IL, Nonappropriated 
Fund Wage Area

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Personnel Management is issuing a final rule to 
abolish the Cook, IL, nonappropriated fund (NAF) Federal Wage System 
wage area and add Cook County, IL, as an area of application to the 
Lake, IL, NAF wage area for pay-setting purposes.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 6, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Paul Shields, (202) 606-2848.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 23, 1994, the Office of 
Personnel Management (OPM) published an interim rule to abolish the 
Cook, IL, nonappropriated fund (NAF) Federal Wage System wage area and 
add Cook County, IL, as an area of application to the Lake, IL, NAF 
wage area for pay-setting purposes. The interim rule provided a 30-day 
period for public comment. OPM received no comments during the comment 
period. Therefore, the interim rule is being adopted as a final rule.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    I certify that these regulations will not have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because they 
affect only Federal agencies and employees.

List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532

    Administrative practice and procedure, Freedom of information, 
Government employees, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Wages.

    Accordingly, under the authority of 5 U.S.C. 5343, the interim rule 
amending 5 CFR part 532 published on November 23, 1994 (59 FR 60293), 
is adopted as final without any changes.

Office of Personnel Management.
Lorraine A. Green,
Deputy Director.
[FR Doc. 95-5452 Filed 3-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-01-M