alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



LOGO



August 16, 2004



Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, NW

Washington, D.C. 20549



|    |  |                                                                                                                                                 
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Re: |  | Conrad Industries, Inc. Certification of Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Ladies and Gentlemen:



Conrad Industries, Inc. filed today, via EDGAR, its quarterly report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004. The undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify that the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



This certification is being furnished solely to comply with the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and is being filed as an
exhibit to the Form 10-Q.



Very truly yours,



/s/ JOHN P. CONRAD, JR.John P. Conrad, Jr.President,Chief Executive OfficerAnd Co-Chairman of the Board/s/ LEWIS J. DERBES, JR.Lewis J. Derbes, Jr.Vice President andChief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

I, Gregory Scott, certify that:

 

1.    I have reviewed this Form 10 Q of bebe stores, inc.;

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.           The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a 15(e) and 15d 15(e)) for the registrant andhave:

 

(a)            Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)           Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)            Disclosedin this report any change to the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.            Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)            Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b)           Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
| Date: May 12,  2005 | /s/ Gregory  Scott         |   |
|---------------------|----------------------------|--------|
|                | Gregory Scott              |
|                | *Chief  Executive Officer* |

 

----
ACCEPTED

01-15-00762-cr

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

11/6/2015 5:15:19 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 11/6/2015 5:15:19 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed and read this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Kolorfusion
International, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly Report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervisions,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this Quarterly Report is being prepared;(b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this Quarterly Report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    disclosed in this Quarterly Report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and board of directors performing the equivalent functions of an
audit committee:
 (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
controls over financial reporting; and
 Date: November 14, 2006
    By:
    /s/ Stephen NagelStephen NagelPresident and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FOLLOWING SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          21,578
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,378
<PP&E>                                       1,079,794
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,096,172
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           60,063
<BONDS>                                        259,858
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    750,000
<COMMON>                                         9,644
<OTHER-SE>                                    (16,607)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,096,172
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                79,865
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,060
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (80,925)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (80,925)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (80,925)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final di sposition.

Before GASTON, ATTANASIO, and MYERS Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES Appellee

v.
Thomas J. McT IERNAN Lance Corporal (E

- 3 ), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant
No. 20 2 100331

_________________________ Decided: 2 March 2022 Appeal from the United States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge : Benjamin A. Robles
Sentence adjudged 12 August 2021 by a special court

- martial convened at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, consisting of a military judge sitting al one
. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment : reduction to E

- 1, confinement for 9 months , forfeiture of $1,000.00 pay per month for 10 months, and a bad

- conduct discharge.
For Appellant: Captain Thomas P. Belsky , JAGC, USNUnited States v. McTiernan , NMCCA No. 20 2100331 Opinion of the Court

2 _________________________ This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2 (a)

.

_________________________
PER CURIAM : After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. 1 T he findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court

1 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
**Exhibit 32.02**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the GRIC Communications,Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004,I, Daniel W. Fairfax, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge based on a reviewof the Report: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company forthe period covered by the Report.

 

 
| Date:  May 10, 2004 | By:    | /s/ Daniel W. Fairfax                                |   |
|--------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                     |   | Daniel W.  Fairfax                                   |
|                     |   | Senior Vice  President & Chief Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to GRIC and will be retained byGRIC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

1

----
Order filed April 2, 2015



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________ No. 11

- 1 5

- 00 067

- C V

__________ IN RE FORD MOTOR COMPANY AND THE SEWELL FAMILY OF COMPANIES, INC. D/B/A SEWELL FORD

- LINCOLN

Original Mandamus Proceeding

O R D E R Relators, Ford Motor Company and the Sewell Family of Companies, Inc.
d/b/a Sewell Ford

- Lincoln have filed a petition for writ of mandamus with this court alleging that Respondent, the Honorable Jim Bobo, J udge of the County
Court at Law of Ector County, Texas, has abused his discretion by denying Ford Motor Company’s motion to disqualify Plaintiff’s counsel in Cause No. CC

- 25797, styled Erik Galindo, Plaintiff v. Ford Motor Company and the Sewe ll Family of Companies, I nc. d/b /a Sewell Ford

- Lincoln, Defendants

. Relators have also filed

an u nopposed motion to stay all proceedings in the trial court pending a ruling in this court regarding Relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. This court has2 requested the Real Party in Interest, Erik Galindo, to file a response to Relators’ petition on or before April 9, 2015.
In order to afford this court sufficient time to review the merits of Relators’ petition and the response to be filed by Real Party in Interest, we grant a stay effective immediately of all proceedings in the trial court in Cause No. CC

- 25797, pending further order of this court. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.10(b) (An appellate court may grant “any ju st relief” pending the disposition of an original petition.).

PER CURIAM

April 2, 2015 Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson , J., and Bailey , J.
2480 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 5 / Monday, January 9, 1995 / Notices

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs

Plan for the Use of the Pueblo of

Nambe Indian Judgment Funds in

Docket No. 358 Before the United

States Court of Federal Claims

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs,

Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

EFFECTIVE DATE: This plan was effective

as of September 28, 1994.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Terry Lamb, Historian, Bureau of Indian

Affairs, Division of Tribal Government

Services, MS 2611–MIB, 1849 C Street,

N.W., Washington, D.C. 20240.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Act of

October 19, 1973, (Pub.L. 93–134, 87

Stat. 466), as amended, requires that a

plan be prepared and submitted to

Congress for the use and distribution of

funds appropriated to pay a judgment of

the Indian Claims Commission or Court

of Claims to any Indian tribe. Funds

were appropriated on March 31, 1994,

in satisfaction of the award granted to

the Pueblo of Nambe before the United

States Court of Federal Claims in Docket

358. The plan for the use of the funds

was submitted to Congress with a letter

dated June 21, 1994, and was received

(as recorded in the Congressional

Record) by the Senate on June 30, 1994,

and by the House of Representatives on

June 24, 1994. The plan became

effective September 28, 1994, as

provided by the 1973 Act, as amended

by Pub.L. 97–458, since a joint

resolution disapproving it was not

enacted. The plan reads as follows: Plan

for the Use of Judgment Funds Awarded

to the Pueblo of Nambe in Docket No.

358 before the United States Court of

Federal Claims

The funds appropriated March 31,

1994, in satisfaction of the award

granted to the Pueblo of Nambe in

Docket 358 before the U.S. Court of

Federal Claims, less attorney fees,

litigation and related expenses, and

including all interest and investment

income accrued, shall be used to pay

outstanding debts for legal services

provided to the Pueblo which are

authorized by the Tribal Council. The

remainder of the funds shall be used for

tribal social, recreational, and economic

development programs including, but

not limited to, land purchases, which

are authorized by the Tribal Council.

All trust responsibility of the United

States for the investment or use of the

judgment funds after their transfer to the

Pueblo shall cease at the time the funds

are transferred to the Pueblo of Nambe.

None of the funds shall be distributed

as per capita or dividend payments.

Ada E. Deer,

Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

[FR Doc. 95–405 Filed 1–6–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–02–P
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 28 (Friday, February 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 8134]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3309]




[[Page 8133]]

_______________________________________________________________________

Part VII





Department of the Interior





_______________________________________________________________________



Bureau of Indian Affairs



_______________________________________________________________________



Pokanoket Tribe of the Wampanoag Nation; Receipt for Federal 
Acknowledgment of Existence as an Indian Tribe; Notice

Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 28 / Friday, February 10, 1995 / 
Notices 
[[Page 8134]] 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Pokanoket Tribe of the Wampanoag Nation; Receipt of Petition for 
Federal Acknowledgment of Existence as an Indian Tribe

    This is published in the exercise of authority delegated by the 
Secretary of the Interior to the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs by 
209 DM 8.
    Pursuant to 25 CFR 83.8(a) (formerly 25 CFR 54.8(a)) notice is 
hereby given that the Pokanoket Tribe of the Wampanoag Nation, 400 
Metacom Avenue, Bristol, Rhode Island 02809, has filed a petition for 
acknowledgment by the Secretary of the Interior that the group exists 
as an Indian tribe. The petition was received by the Bureau of Indian 
Affairs (BIA) on October 5, 1994, and was signed by members of the 
group's governing body.
    This is a notice of receipt of petition and does not constitute 
notice that the petition is under active consideration. Notice of 
active consideration will be sent by mail to the petitioner and other 
interested parties at the appropriate time.
    Under Section 83.8(d) (formerly 54.8(d)) of the Federal 
regulations, interested parties may submit factual and/or legal 
arguments in support of or in opposition to the group's petition. Any 
information submitted will be made available on the same basis as other 
information in the BIA's files. Such submissions will be provided to 
the petitioner upon receipt by the BIA. The petitioner will be provided 
an opportunity to respond to such submissions prior to a final 
determination regarding the petitioner's status.
    The petition may be examined, by appointment, in the Department of 
the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Branch of Acknowledgment and 
Research, Room 1362-MIB, 1849 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20240, 
Phone: (202) 208-3592.

    Dated: January 24, 1995.
Ada E. Deer,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 95-3309 Filed 2-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3692 

To direct the Federal Communications Commission to evaluate and consider 

the impact of the telecommunications network equipment supply chain 

on the deployment of universal service, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 17, 2022 

Mr. HICKENLOOPER (for himself, Mr. MORAN, Mr. TESTER, and Mrs. CAPITO) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To direct the Federal Communications Commission to evaluate and consider the impact of the telecommunications 

network equipment supply chain on the deployment of 

universal service, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Network Equipment 

5 Transparency Act’’ or the ‘‘NET Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3692 IS

1 SEC. 2. TELECOMMUNICATIONS SUPPLY CHAIN CONSIDER2 ATION. 

3 Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 

4 (47 U.S.C. 1302) is amended— 

5 (1) by redesignating subsection (d) as sub6 section (e); and 

7 (2) by inserting after subsection (c) the fol8 lowing: 

9 ‘‘(d) STATUS OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS SUPPLY

10 CHAIN.—As part of the inquiry required by subsection (b), 

11 the Commission shall, to the extent that data is available, 

12 determine whether a lack of network equipment signifi13 cantly impacted the deployment of advanced telecommuni14 cations capability during the applicable year.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 400 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 400

      To designate the headquarters building of the Department of 
 Transportation located at 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, in Washington, 
       DC, as the ``William T. Coleman, Jr., Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 24, 2021

  Mr. Wicker (for himself, Ms. Cantwell, Mr. Carper, Mrs. Capito, Mr. 
   Scott of South Carolina, Mr. Booker, Mr. Warnock, Mr. Casey, Mr. 
  Toomey, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Inhofe, and Mr. Barrasso) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                      Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To designate the headquarters building of the Department of 
 Transportation located at 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, in Washington, 
       DC, as the ``William T. Coleman, Jr., Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``William T. Coleman, Jr., Department 
of Transportation Headquarters Act''.

SEC. 2. WILLIAM T. COLEMAN, JR., FEDERAL BUILDING.

    (a) In General.--The headquarters building of the Department of 
Transportation located at 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, in Washington, 
DC, shall be known and designated as the ``William T. Coleman, Jr., 
Federal Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the building referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``William T. 
Coleman, Jr., Federal Building''.
                                 <all>
```