alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1




                              Certification of CEO
                         pursuant to Section 906 of the
              Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 regarding Quarterly Report
              on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31, 2004
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby
certify that:

         1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal period
ended January 31, 2004, (the Form 10Q-SB) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and

         2. Information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:    March 8, 2004                  By:/s/ Joseph Kristul
         -------------                  -------------------------------
                                           Joseph Kristul
                                           Chief Executive Officer






<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32.2



                              Certification of CFO
                         pursuant to Section 906 of the
              Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 regarding Quarterly Report
              on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31, 2004
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby
certify that:

         1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal period
ended January 31, 2004 (the Form 10Q-SB) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. Information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:   March 8, 2004                   By:/s/ Jack Thrift
        -------------                   ----------------------
                                        Jack Thrift
                                        Chief Financial Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 25, 2017

No. 04-15-00806-CR

Michael Wilfred LAFLAMME,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 406th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CRW160-D4

Honorable Oscar J. Hale, Jr., Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

The panel has considered the Appellant’s Motion to Stay Mandate, and the motion is 

hereby MOOT.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 25th day of July, 2017.

___________________________________

Luz Estrada

Chief Deputy Clerk
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 7, 1995 / Rules and Regulations 12487

Dated: February 15, 1995.

Mollie H. Beattie,

Director, Fish and Wildlife Service.

[FR Doc. 95–5508 Filed 3–6–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–55–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric

Administration

50 CFR Part 675

[Docket No. 950206040–5040–01; I.D.

022895D]

Groundfish of the Bering Sea and

Aleutian Islands Area; Inshore

Component Pollock Fishery in the

Bering Sea Subarea

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),

Commerce.

ACTION: Closure.

SUMMARY: NMFS is closing the directed

fishery for pollock by vessels catching

pollock for processing by the inshore

component in the Bering Sea subarea

(BS) of the Bering Sea and Aleutian

Islands management area (BSAI). This

action is necessary to prevent exceeding

the first allowance of the pollock total

allowable catch (TAC) for the inshore

component in this area.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 12 noon, Alaska local

time (A.l.t.), March 1, 1995, until 12

noon, A.l.t., August 15, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Andrew N. Smoker, 907–586-7228.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

groundfish fishery in the BSAI exclusive

economic zone is managed by NMFS

according to the Fishery Management

Plan for the Groundfish Fishery of the

Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Area

(FMP) prepared by the North Pacific

Fishery Management Council under

authority of the Magnuson Fishery

Conservation and Management Act.

Fishing by U.S. vessels is governed by

regulations implementing the FMP at 50

CFR parts 620 and 675.

In accordance with § 675.20(a)(7)(ii),

the first seasonal allowance of pollock

for the inshore component in the BS

was established by the final groundfish

specifications (60 FR 8479, February 14,

1995) as 167,344 metric tons (mt).

The Director, Alaska Region, NMFS

(Regional Director), has determined in

accordance with § 675.20(a)(8), that the

first allowance of pollock TAC for the

inshore component in the BS soon will

be reached. Therefore, the Regional

Director has established a directed

fishing allowance of 162,344 mt with

consideration that 5,000 mt will be

taken as incidental catch in directed

fishing for other species in the BS.

Consequently, NMFS is prohibiting

directed fishing for pollock by vessels

catching pollock for processing by the

inshore component in the BS.

Directed fishing standards for

applicable gear types may be found in

the regulations at § 675.20(h).

Classification

This action is taken under § 675.20

and is exempt from review under E.O.

12866.

Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

Dated: March 1, 1995.

David S. Crestin,

Acting Director, Office of Fisheries

Conservation and Management, National

Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 95–5434 Filed 3–1–95; 3:56 pm]

BILLING CODE 3510–22–F
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 28, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 10864]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4866]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Dkt. C-3554]


Medical Staff of Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center; 
Prohibited Trade Practices, and Affirmative Corrective Actions

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Consent order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In settlement of alleged violations of federal law prohibiting 
unfair acts and practices and unfair methods of competition, this 
consent order prohibits, among other things, the members of the medical 
staff from agreeing, or attempting to enter into an agreement, to 
prevent or restrict the services offered by Good Samaritan, the clinic, 
or any other health care provider by refusing to deal with others 
offering health care services, or by withholding patient referrals.

DATES: Complaint and Order issued February 1, 1995.\1\

    \1\Copies of the Complaint, the Decision and Order, and 
Commissioner Starek's statement are available from the Commission's 
Public Reference Branch, H-130, 6th Street & Pennsylvania Avenue, 
NW., Washington, DC. 20580.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Horoschak, FTC/S-3115, 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Washington, DC 20580. (202) 326-2756.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On Friday, September 23, 1994, there was 
published in the Federal Register, 59 FR 48889, a proposed consent 
agreement with analysis In the Matter of Medical Staff of Good 
Samaritan Regional Medical Center, for the purpose of soliciting public 
comment. Interested parties were given sixty (60) days in which to 
submit comments, suggestions or objections regarding the proposed form 
of the order.

    A comment was filed and considered by the Commission. The 
Commission has ordered the issuance of the complaint in the form 
contemplated by the agreement, made its jurisdictional findings and 
entered an order to cease and desist, as set forth in the proposed 
consent agreement, in disposition of this proceeding.

(Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interprets or applies sec. 5, 
38 Stat. 719, as amended; 15 U.S.C. 45)
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-4866 Filed 2-27-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
The Honorable Ann Aldrich, United States District Judge for the Northern District of *

Ohio, sitting by designation. 

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 07a0787n.06

Filed: November 8, 2007

No. 07-5297

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

POLLY WELLS, as Executrix of the Estate of

John Wells, Deceased,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

PORTMAN EQUIPMENT COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES

DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN

DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT

LEXINGTON

Before: KEITH and ROGERS, Circuit Judges; and ALDRICH, District Judge.*

ANN ALDRICH, District Judge. This is a products liability case based on diversity

jurisdiction. Plaintiff-appellant Polly Wells, executrix of the estate of her husband, John Wells,

appeals an order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky granting

defendants’ motions for summary judgment on her products liability claims.

John Wells, an electrician for United Metals Automation and Control (“UMAC”), was

electrocuted when using an electric ariel liftmanufactured by defendant-appelleeBil-Jax, Inc. (“BilJax”), and subsequently sold to UMAC by defendant-appellee Portman Equipment Company

(“Portman”). As manufactured, the lift would only operate if all four of its outriggers were extended

to provide stability. Sometime after UMAC purchased the lift, it was rewired to operate without all
-2-

of the outriggers deployed. On October 27, 2004, Mr. Wells used the lift without deploying all of

the outriggers, exposing a small metal notch that would not have been exposed had the outriggers

been deployed. Mr. Wells then tied an extension cord to the rail of the lift’s cage, which became

lodged in the exposed notch. As Mr. Wells elevated the lift, the notch stripped the cord, energizing

the lift. When Mr. Wells came into contact with the electrical components attached to the building,

he completed the electrical circuit and sustained fatal injuries.

Mrs. Wells subsequently alleged that the lift was unreasonably dangerous in its manufactured

state, bringing products liability claims for a design defect and failure to warn against Bil-Jax and

Portman. After removing the case to federal court, Bil-Jax and Portman each filed motions for

summary judgment. 

Upon reviewing the record de novo, we find that summary judgment in favor of Bil-Jax and

Portman is the appropriate disposition in this case. In a thorough and well-reasoned opinion, the

district court reached the same conclusion on two grounds: (1) that KRS 411.320 (1) barred Wells

from recovery in light of the modification ofthe lift; and (2) that Wells had failed to present evidence

of a design defect. Because the district court fully addressed the issues and disposed of them

correctly on the second ground, the issuance of an opinion by this Court would be merely duplicative

and would not add to existing case law. Therefore, we affirm on the basis of the district court’s

second ground and reserve judgment on the applicability of KRS 411.320 (1).
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 41 (Thursday, March 2, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11679-11680]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5142]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

    In accordance with Departmental policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that a proposed consent decree in United States v. Cape 
Fear Community College et al., Civil Action No. 7:95-CF-19-F3, was 
lodged on February 21, 1995, with the United States District Court for 
the Eastern District of North Carolina. This agreement resolves a 
judicial enforcement action brought by the United States against the 
defendants pursuant to Section 107 of the Comprehensive Environmental 
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended by the Superfund 
Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99-499, 42 U.S.C. 
Sec. 9607, for the recovery of response costs incurred by the United 
States in connection with the New Hanover County Airport Burn Pit 
Superfund Site, (``the Site'') located in Wilmington, New Hanover 
County, North Carolina.
    The consent decree requires the settling defendants to pay 100 
percent of the past response costs which the United States has incurred 
at the Site.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20530, and should refer to United 
States v. Cape Fear Community College, et al., DOJ Ref. #90-11-2-885.
    The proposed consent decree may be examined at the Office of the 
United States Attorney, Federal Building, Suite 800, 310 New Bern 
Avenue, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27522-1461, and at the Region IV 
Office of the Environmental Protection Agency, 345 Courtland Street 
N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30365; and at the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G 
Street N.W., 4th Floor Washington, DC 20005, 202-624-0892. A copy of 
the proposed consent decree may be obtained in person or by mail from 
the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, 
DC 20005. In requesting a copy, please refer to the referenced case and 
enclose a check in the amount of $5,00 (25 cents per page 
[[Page 11680]] reproduction costs), payable to the Consent Decree 
Library.
Bruce Gelber,
Acting Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 95-5142 Filed 3-1-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 3.3

                                   RESOLUTIONS
                                     OF THE
                              BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
                        MARINER POST-ACUTE NETWORK, INC.,
                             A DELAWARE CORPORATION,
                  ADOPTED AT A MEETING DULY CALLED AND HELD ON

                                December 13, 2001

         WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 8.08(ii) of the Third Amended and Restated
Bylaws of the Corporation (the "Bylaws"), the Board of Directors (the "Board")
has the authority to amend the Bylaws; and

         WHEREAS, the Board believes it is in the Corporation's best interest to
amend the Bylaws to change the date of the Fiscal Year end.

         NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that SECTION 1.03 of the Bylaws is
hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

                  SECTION 1.03 Fiscal Year. The fiscal year of the corporation
         shall end on the 31st of December in each year.
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.9.2

SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE
MERISTAR HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS INCENTIVE PLAN



|Pursuant to the approval by the Board of Directors of MeriStar Hotels &
Resorts, Inc. (the Company) and the Companys shareholders at the Companys
2002 Annual Meeting, the MeriStar Hotels & Resorts, Inc. Non-Employee
Directors Incentive Plan (the Plan) is amended, effective August 1, 2002, as
follows:
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 1. |  | The Plan shall now be called the Interstate Hotels & Resorts,
Inc. Non-Employee Directors Incentive Plan and every place that the
word MeriStar is used in the Plan shall be replaced by the word
Interstate.                                                                                                                                                                             
| | -- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. |  | The following paragraph shall be added to the end of Article
VII of the Plan:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|
| |    |  | Notwithstanding the foregoing, no adjustment to the maximum
aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued
under the Plan or the size of the awards to be granted under
Article 4.1 hereof shall be made in respect of any reverse stock
split approved at the Companys 2002 Annual Meeting of
stockholders that is effected by the Company in accordance with
such approval.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Interstate Hotels & Resorts, Inc. has caused this amendment
to the Plan to be duly executed in its corporate name this 1st day of August,
2002.

INTERSTATE HOTELS & RESORTS, INC______________________________
Christopher L. Bennett
Senior Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-10446

Excelitas Technologies Corp.:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     The schedule contains summary financial information from the Registrant's
     consolidated financial statements as of and for the six months ended June
     30, 2000, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
     consolidated financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             814
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,514
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  64,491
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,100
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          7160
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,231
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    64,491
<SALES>                                          5,122
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                           27,651
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,651
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                (8,313)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (14,216)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (14,216)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (14,216)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Lawyer Media Holdings, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
William L. Pollak, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Eric F.
Lundberg, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

   /s/ WILLIAM L. POLLAK
-------------------------------
William L. Pollak
President and Chief Executive Officer
November 12, 2004

   /s/ ERIC F. LUNDBERG
-------------------------------
Eric F. Lundberg
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
November 12, 2004

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.