alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 29, 2010 

s0322 

Order 

 

March 29, 2010 

140132 

_________________________________________ 

In re Petition of WAYNE COUNTY 

TREASURER. 

_________________________________________ 

WAYNE COUNTY TREASURER, 

Petitioner, 

v SC: 140132 

 COA: 285703 

Wayne CC: 05-517048-PZ 

ROMEL CASAB and BAN CASAB, 

Respondents-Appellees. 

and 

JEFFREY A. BOLYARD and DETROIT 

WAREHOUSE COMPANY, INC., 

 Respondents, 

and 

KASSEM BEYDOUN, GHADA BEYDOUN, 

HOUSTON SERVICES, INC., H & T SERVICES, 

INC., and HAYS ENTERPRISES, INC., 

 Intervening Parties-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 27, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 40 (Wednesday, March 1, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 11084]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4894]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-S162-5]


Proposed Settlement Under Section 122(h) of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, as Amended, 42 
U.S.C. 9622(h), Arkla Hunnewell Compressor Station, Hunnewell, Sumner 
County, KS

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of proposed settlement and request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 122(i) of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, as amended by 
the Superfund Amendment and Reauthorization Act (``CERCLA''), notice is 
hereby given of a proposed settlement to resolve a claim against NorAm 
Energy Corporation, formerly Arkla, Inc. The proposed settlement 
concerns the federal government's past response costs at the Arkla 
Hunnewell Compressor Station Site, Hunnewell, Summer County, Kansas. 
The settlement requires the settling party, NorAm Energy Corporation, 
to pay $130,938.25 to the Hazardous Substance Superfund.
    For thirty (30) days following the date of publication of this 
notice, the Agency will receive written comments relating to the 
settlement. The Agency's response to any comments received will be 
available for public inspection at the U.S. EPA Region VII office at 
726 Minnesota Avenue, Kansas City, Kansas 66101. A copy of the proposed 
settlement may be obtained from Venessa Cobbs, Regional Hearing Clerk, 
EPA Region VII, 726 Minnesota Avenue, Kansas City, Kansas 66101, 
telephone number (913) 551-7630. Comments should reference the ``Arkla 
Hunnewell Compressor Station Site'' and EPA Docket No. VII-95-F-0006 
and should be addressed to Ms. Cobbs at the above address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan Kahn, Assistant Regional 
Counsel, EPA Region VII, Office of Regional Counsel, 726 Minnesota 
Avenue, Kansas City, Kansas 66101, telephone number (913) 551-7252.

    Dated: February 1, 1995.
Dennis Grams,
Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 95-4894 Filed 2-28-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
EXHIBIT 31.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 / SEC Rule 13a14(a)

I, Jeremy Ferrell, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Path 1 Network Technologies Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
report is being prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 13, 2006



|                                              
|----------------------------------------------
|                                              
|/s/    Jeremy Ferrell                         
|Jeremy Ferrell Interim Chief Financial
Officer
Order entered November 27 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 00595
- CR
JAMES EDWARD GRUMBLE S, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. MB10
- 69593
- B



### O RDER
The Court REINSTATE S the appeal. On October 15, 2013, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant’s brief had not been filed. On November 26, 2013, we received appellant’s brief, together with an extension motion. Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we VACATE the October 15, 2013 order requiring findings.
We GRANT the November 26, 2013 extension motion and ORDER appellant’s brief
filed as of the date of this order. In his brief , appellant raises an issue related to the costs assessed against him. The record, however, does not contain a cost bill or other document with an itemized list of costs assessed in this case.Accordingly, we ORDER the Dallas County Clerk to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of

the date of this order, a supplemental clerk’s record containing a detailed itemization of the costs assessed in this case, including but not limited to, specific court costs, fees, and court appointed attorney fees. In accordance with Tex as Code of Criminal Procedure article 103.001, the cost bill shall be signed by the officer who charged the cost or the officer who is entitled to receive payment for the cost. We further ORDER that the supplemental clerk’s record include a document expla ining any and all abbreviations used to designate a particular fee, cost, or court appointed attorney fee.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to John Warren, Dallas County Clerk; the Dallas County Clerk’s Office, Criminal Records Division; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1758

Northern Tool & Equipment:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 32 (Thursday, February 18, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 8191]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-03314]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER16-890-000]


Summer Solar LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based 
Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Summer Solar LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with an 
accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a 
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is March 1, 2016.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the 
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an 
eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive 
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). 
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cc8a899e8f83a2a0a5a2a99fb9bcbca3beb88caaa9beafe2aba3ba"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="03454651404c6d6f6a6d66507673736c717743656671602d646c75">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: February 10, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-03314 Filed 2-17-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00103-CR

Melvin MARTIN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR3537

Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED April 1, 2015.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Freddie Lee Walker v. Rissie Owens, et al.

Appellate case number: 01-15-00361-CV

Trial court case number: D-1-GN-14-001926

Trial court: 126th District Court of Travis County

Appellant, Freddie Lee Walker, has filed a motion requesting an extension of time in 

which to file his appellant’s brief. We grant the motion. Appellant’s brief is due to be filed no 

later than 30 days after the date of this order.

By his motion and other correspondence, Walker indicates that he has requested from the 

district court clerk a copy of the clerk’s record that was filed in this Court on July 2, 2015, and 

has not received a copy of the clerk’s record. Accordingly, we direct the district court clerk, no 

later than 10 days from the date of this order, to send a copy of the one-volume clerk’s record to 

Walker. We further direct the trial court clerk, no later than 15 days from the date of this order, 

to notify the Clerk of this Court the date on which delivery to Walker was made. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: August 25, 2015
EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the quarterly report of Golden State Vintners, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, John Kelleher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbannes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/JOHN KELLEHERJohn Kelleher
Chief Financial Officer
May 15, 2003 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 
|                                                                   |  | 

---

QuickLinks
### The Honorable Frederick R. Buckles, United States Magistrate

Judge fo r the Eastern District of Missouri, to whom the case wa s referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). ___________ No. 96-2579

___________ Calvin J. Weber, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Thomas E. Reinkober, Federal * Eastern District of Missouri. Official Named in His * Individual Capacity, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: February 7, 1997 Filed: February 26, 1997

___________ Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.
CalvinJ . Weber, a former civilian Army engineer, appeals from th e district court's order dismissing his complaint under Bivens v. Si x 1 Unkn ownAgents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971), fo r failure t o state a claim. Having carefully reviewed the record and th e briefs, we conclude the judgment of the district court is correct and an extended opinion would lack precedential value. Accordingly, we affirm th e judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

### -2- A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-23-00320-CR

MIKE ZAFF, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 211th District 

Court

of Denton County (F18-2408-431)

August 8, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Elizabeth Kerr

 Justice Elizabeth Kerr
| Name of Subsidiary                               | Jurisdiction of Organization |
|--------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|
|                                             |                         |
| Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc.               | Delaware                     |
|                                             |                         |
| Palomar Medical Products, Inc.                   | Delaware                     |
|                                             |                         |
| Palomar Medical Technologies B.V.                | The Netherlands              |
|                                             |                         |
| Palomar Medical Technologies (Australia) Pty Ltd | Australia                    |
|                                             |                         |
| Palomar Japan K.K.                               | Japan                        |
|                                             |                         |
| Palomar Medical Technologies GmbH                | Germany                      |
|                                             |                         |
| Palomar Medical Technologies S.L.U.              | Spain                        |
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Tyrone Richards v. State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-20-00086-CV

Trial court case number: 2012-13937

Trial court: 269th District Court of Harris County

On February 18, 2020, appellant filed a motion for extension of time to file his brief. 

Contrary to appellant’s request, no deadline for the filing of appellant’s brief has been set 

because the complete appellate record has not yet been filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). 

Accordingly, we dismiss appellant’s motion as moot. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ______/s/ Sherry Radack_______

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___February 25, 2020___
**Exhibit 32.02**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.**

 

**SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

 

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

 

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the GRIC Communications, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for thequarterly period ended June 30, 2003, I, Kim Silverman, Chief Financial Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best ofmy knowledge based on a review of the Report: (1) the Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompany for the period covered by the Report.

 

 
| Date:  August 14, 2003 | By:    | /s/ Kim S. Silverman                         |
|-----------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|                        |   | Kim S. Silverman                             |
|                        |   | Vice President & Chief Financial Officer |

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toGRIC and will be retained by GRIC and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   48,265                  48,265
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (1,925)                 (1,925)
<INVENTORY>                                     13,275                  13,275
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,310                  67,310
<PP&E>                                         105,755                 105,755
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (11,279)                (11,279)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 265,546                 265,546
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,698                  26,698
<BONDS>                                        130,000                 130,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,497                   1,497
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             8                       8
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,928                  34,928
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   265,546                 265,546
<SALES>                                         65,277                 121,655
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                65,277                 121,655
<CGS>                                           50,403                  91,166
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   63,518                 114,189
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (230)                   (517)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    93                     233
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,353                  10,027
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3,364)                 (2,044)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,242)                   (675)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,122)                 (1,369)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,122)                 (1,369)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.28)                  (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.28)                  (0.19)


</TABLE>