9672 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 21, 1995 / Notices

Education, 600 Independence Avenue

SW., Switzer Building, Room 3417,

Washington, D.C. 20202. Telephone:

(202) 205–9141. Individuals who use a

telecommunications device for the deaf

(TDD) may call the TDD number at (202)

205–8887.

Dated: February 15, 1995.

Howard R. Moses,

Acting Assistant, Secretary for Special

Education and Rehabilitative Services.

[FR Doc. 95–4162 Filed 2–17–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4000–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. ER95–149–002, et al.]

Alabama Power Company, et al.;

Electric Rate and Corporate Regulation

Filings

February 13, 1995.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Alabama Power Company

[Docket No. ER95–149–002]

Take notice that on January 30, 1995,

Alabama Power Company tendered for

filing amended procedures applicable to

its recovery of emission allowance

replacement costs under the

Interconnection Agreement Between

Alabama Power Company and Alabama

Electric Cooperative, Inc., and the

Agreement for Transmission Service to

Distribution Cooperative Members of

Alabama Electric Cooperative. The

purpose of the filing is to comply with

the Commission’s Order of December

30, 1994 in Docket No. ER95–149–000.

Comment date: February 24, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

2. Northeast Utilities Service Company

[Docket No. ER95–357–000]

Take notice that on January 30, 1995,

Northeast Utilities Service company

(NUSCO), tendered for filing on behalf

of The Connecticut Light and Power

Company (CL&P), Western

Massachusetts Electric Company

(WMECO), Holyoke Water Power

Company (HWP), Holyoke Power and

Electric Company and Public Service

company of New Hampshire (together,

the NU System Companies) a missing

Schedule B to a Distribution Service

Agreement previously filed by NUSCO

in the above-referenced docket.

NUSCO renews its request that the

proposed rate schedule changes be

permitted to become effective January 1,

1995. NUSCO states that a copy of the

filing has been mailed or delivered to

the affected parties.

Comment date: February 24, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

3. Logan Generating Company, L.P.

[Docket No. ER95–471–000]

Take notice that on January 23, 1995,

Logan Generating Company, L.P.

tendered for filing a Notice of

Succession notifying the Commission

that Keystone Energy Service Company,

L.P.’s name has changed to Logan

Generating Company, L.P.

Comment date: February 27, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

4. Midwest Power Systems Inc.

[Docket No. ER95–486–000]

Take notice that on January 27, 1995,

Midwest Power Systems Inc. (Midwest)

tendered for filing amendments to

coordination rate schedules provide for

the recovery of cost of emission

allowances.

Midwest respectfully requests a

waiver of Commission rules so that the

amendments may be approved

retroactive to January 1, 1995. Midwest

agrees that any revenues collected from

these amendments will collected subject

to refund pending Commission action.

Midwest states that copies of this

filing were served on the parties

identified in Exhibit II of the filing.

Comment date: February 27, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

5. American Electric Power Service

Corporation

[Docket No. ER95–497–000]

Take notice that on February 1, 1995,

the American Electric Power Service

Corporation (AEPSC) amended its filing

in the above referenced Docket to add

one agreement.

A copy of the filing was served upon

the parties affected by the amendment

and the affected state regulatory

commissions for the states of Ohio,

Indiana, Michigan, Virginia, West

Virginia, Kentucky, and Tennessee.

Comment date: February 24, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

6. Jersey Central Power & Light

Company, Metropolitan Edison

Company, Pennsylvania Electric

Company

[Docket No. ER95–544–000]

Take notice that on January 20, 1995,

GPU Service Corporation (GPU), on

behalf of Jersey Central Power & Light

Company, Metropolitan Edison

Company and Pennsylvania Electric

Company (jointly referred to as the GPU

Operating Companies), filed an

executed Service Agreement between

GPU and Enron Power Marketing, Inc.

(Enron). This Service Agreement

specifies that Enron has agreed to the

rates, terms and conditions of the GPU

Operating Companies’ Operating

Capacity and/or Energy Sales Tariff

(Sales Tariff) designated as FERC

Electric Tariff, Original Volume No. 1.

The Sales Tariff was filed with the

Commission on December 12, 1994 in

Docket No. ER95–276–000 and allows

GPU and Enron to enter into separately

scheduled transactions under which the

GPU Operating Companies will make

available for sale, surplus operating

capacity and/or energy at negotiated

rates that are no higher than the GPU

Operating Companies’ cost of service.

GPU requests a waiver of the

Commission’s notice requirements for

good cause shown and an effective date

of December 20, 1994 for the Service

Agreement.

GPU has served copies of the filing on

regulatory agencies in New Jersey and

Pennsylvania.

Comment date: February 24, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

7. Jersey Central Power & Light

Company, Metropolitan Edison

Company, Pennsylvania Electric

Company

[Docket No. ER95–545–000]

Take notice that on January 20, 1995,

GPU Service Corporation (GPU), on

behalf of Jersey Central Power & Light

Company, Metropolitan Edison

Company and Pennsylvania Electric

Company (jointly referred to as the GPU

Operating Companies), filed an

executed Service Agreement between

GPU and Louis Dreyfus Electric Power

Inc. (Louis Dreyfus). This Service

Agreement specifies that Louis Dreyfus

has agreed to the rates, terms and

conditions of the GPU Operating

Companies’ Operating Capacity and/or

Energy Sales Tariff (Sales Tariff)

designated as FERC Electric Tariff,

Original Volume No. 1. The Sales Tariff

was filed with the Commission on

December 12, 1994 in Docket No. ER95–

276–000 and allows GPU and Louis

Dreyfus to enter into separately

scheduled transactions under which the

GPU Operating Companies will make

available for sale, surplus operating

capacity and/or energy at negotiated

rates that are no higher than the GPU

Operating Companies’ cost of service.

GPU requests a waiver of the

Commission’s notice requirements for
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 21, 1995 / Notices 9673

1Atlantic Gas Systems, Incorporated’s application

was filed with the Commission under Section 7 of

the Natural Gas Act and Part 157 of the

Commission’s regulations.

2The appendices referenced in this notice are not

being printed in the Federal Register. Copies are

available from the Commission’s Public Reference

and Files Maintenance Branch, Room 3104, 941

North Capitol Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426,

or call (202) 208–1371. Copies of the appendices

were sent to all those receiving this notice in the

mail.

good cause shown and an effective date

of December 28, 1994 for the Service

Agreement.

GPU has served copies of the filing on

regulatory agencies in New Jersey and

Pennsylvania.

Comment date: February 24, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

8. Jersey Central Power & Light

Company, Metropolitan Edison

Company, Pennsylvania Electric

Company

[Docket No. ER95–546–000]

Take notice that on January 20, 1995,

GPU Service Corporation (GPU), on

behalf of Jersey Central Power & Light

Company, Metropolitan Edison

Company and Pennsylvania Electric

Company (jointly referred to as the GPU

Operating Companies), filed an

executed Service Agreement between

GPU and Long Island Lighting Company

(LILCO). This Service Agreement

specifies that LILCO has agreed to the

rates, terms and conditions of the GPU

Operating Companies’ Operating

Capacity and/or Energy Sales Tariff

(Sales Tariff) designated as FERC

Electric Tariff, Original Volume No. 1.

The Sales Tariff was filed with the

Commission on December 12, 1994 in

Docket No. ER95–276–000 and allows

GPU and LILCO to enter into separately

scheduled transactions under which the

GPU Operating Companies will make

available for sale, surplus operating

capacity and/or energy at negotiated

rates that are no higher than the GPU

Operating Companies’ cost of service.

GPU requests a waiver of the

Commission’s notice requirements for

good cause shown and an effective date

of December 23, 1994 for the Service

Agreement.

GPU has served copies of the filing on

regulatory agencies in New Jersey and

Pennsylvania.

Comment date: February 24, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

9. Ohio Power Company

[Docket No. FA92–60–001]

Take notice that on January 27, 1995,

Ohio Power Company tendered for

filing a Compliance Filing pursuant to

the Commission’s Letter Order issued

December 2, 1994.

Copies of the filing were served upon

Wheeling Power Company, the Public

Service Commission of West Virginia,

the affected municipal customers and

the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.

Comment date: February 24, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

10. University Cogeneration, Inc.

[Docket Nos. QF86–529–003 and EL94–76–

000]

On February 2, 1995, University

Cogeneration, Inc. (Applicant)

submitted for filing an amendment to its

filing in this docket.

The amendment provides additional

information pertaining to the operation

of Applicant’s cogeneration facility. No

determination has been made that the

submittal constitutes a complete filing.

Comment date: March 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, NE.,

Washington, DC 20426, in accordance

with Rules 211 and 214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR

385.214). All such motions or protests

should be filed on or before the

comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–4109 Filed 2–17–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Docket No. CP95–92–000]

Atlantic Gas Systems, Inc.; Notice of

Intent To Prepare an Environmental

Assessment for the Proposed Myer

Compressor Station and Request for

Comments on Environmental Issues

February 15, 1995.

The staff of the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission (FERC or the

Commission) will prepare an

Environmental Assessment (EA) that

will discuss environmental impacts of

the construction and operation of the

proposed Myer Compressor Station.1

This EA will be used by the

Commission in its decision-making

process to determine whether an

environmental impact statement is

necessary and whether to approve the

project.

Summary of the Proposed Project

Atlantic Gas Systems, Incorporated

(Atlantic) wants Commission

authorization to construct and operate a

new 825-horsepower (hp) compressor

station on the site of an existing

compressor foundation in Cabell

County, West Virginia.

Atlantic would construct the

following facilities:

• One skid-mounted 825-hp

reciprocating engine-driven

compressor unit leased from Cardinal

Compression, Inc.;

• An insulated compressor building;

and

• An office/control building.

The location of these facilities is

shown in appendix 1.2

Land Requirements for Construction

Atlantic purchased a 3.42-acre site in

Cabell County that was previously used

for a compressor station. Atlantic would

keep all construction disturbance within

this site.

The EA Process

The National Environmental Policy

Act (NEPA) requires the Commission to

take into account the environmental

impacts that could result from an action

whenever it considers the issuance of a

Certificate of Public Convenience and

Necessity. NEPA also requires us to

discover and address concerns the

public may have about proposals. We

call this ‘‘scoping’’. The main goal of the

scoping process is to focus the analysis

in the EA on the important

environmental issues. By this Notice of

Intent, the Commission requests public

comments on the scope of the issues it

will address in the EA. All comments

received are taken into account during

the preparation of the EA. State and

local government representatives are

encouraged to notify their constituents

of this proposed action and encourage

them to comment on their areas of

concern.

The EA will discuss impacts that

could occur as a result of the

construction and operation of the

proposed project under these general

headings:

• Geology and soils