alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1
 
 Section 1350 Certification
 
 
 Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) (17 CFR §240.13a-14(b)) or Rule 15d-14(b) (17 CFR §240.15d-14(b)) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350),
each of the undersigned officers of Adams Golf, Inc., (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge,
 
 The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2009 (the "Quarterly Report"), of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as applicable, and the information contained in the Quarterly
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Quarterly Report.
 
 
 Date: November 12, 2009

By:/S/ OLIVER G. BREWER IIIOliver G. Brewer, IIIChief Executive Officer and President(Principal Executive Officer)Date: November 12, 2009

By:/S/ PAMELA HIGHPamela HighInterim Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
 
 
 The foregoing certification is furnished as an exhibit to the Periodic Report and will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or Exchange Act, whether
made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Jeffrey B. O'Neill, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Golden State Vintners, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly represent in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



|Date: February 17, 2004                                         |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                                                                |  | 
|/s/JEFFREY B. O'NEILLJeffrey B. O'Neill
Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|                                                                |  | 

---

QuickLinks
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

697 

CA 11-02503 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF CITY OF SYRACUSE, 

PETITIONER-APPELLANT, 

V ORDER

CENTRAL NEW YORK ASSOCIATION OF DELTA KAPPA 

EPSILON, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

 

MARY ANNE DOHERTY, CORPORATION COUNSEL, SYRACUSE (THOMAS R. BABILON OF

COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT. 

MENTER, RUDIN & TRIVELPIECE, P.C., SYRACUSE (TERESA M. BENNETT OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Onondaga County Court (Anthony F.

Aloi, J.), entered March 14, 2011. The order, insofar as appealed

from, denied the motion of petitioner to dismiss the appeal of

respondent. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs. 

Entered: June 8, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
ex10-1.htm





 




  





1











  









 




  





2











  









 




  





3











  









 




  





4











  









5
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 6 (Tuesday, January 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 2578]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-556]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Notice of Inventions Available for License

AGENCY: Department of Energy, Office of General Counsel.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy announces that two patents 
entitled ``Fiber Optic Mounted Laser Driven Flyer Plates'' and ``Laser 
Driven Flyer Plates'' are available for license. Exclusive licensing of 
Government-owned inventions is authorized under certain circumstances, 
if proper notice of the invention's availability for license is given.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert J. Marchick, Office of the Assistant General Counsel for 
Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property, U.S. Department of 
Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20585; 
Telephone (202) 586-2802.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 35 U.S.C. 207 authorizes licensing of 
Government-owned inventions. Implementing regulations are contained in 
37 CFR Part 404. 37 CFR 404.7(a)(1) authorizes exclusive licensing of 
Government-owned inventions under certain circumstances, provided that 
notice of the invention's availability for license has been announced 
in the Federal Register.
    U.S. Patent No. 5,029,528, entitled ``Fiber Optic Mounted Laser 
Driven Flyer Plates'' and U.S. Patent No. 5,046,423, entitled ``Laser 
Driven Flyer Plates'' are available for license, in accordance with 35 
U.S.C. 207-209. A copy of the patents may be obtained, for a modest 
fee, from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, D.C. 20231.

    Issued in Washington, D.C., on January 4, 1995.
Robert R. Nordhaus,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 95-556 Filed 1-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-M
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

 

I, Walter Parks, certify that:

 

1.               Ihave reviewed this Form 10-Q of bebe stores, inc.;

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)               Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)              Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)               Disclosed in thisreport any change to the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)               All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b)              Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: November 5, 2004 | /s/ Walter Parks          |   |
|------------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|                   | Walter Parks              |
|                   | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

1

----
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3887 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3887

 To amend the West Los Angeles Leasing Act of 2016 with respect to the 
                    definition of land use revenue.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 21, 2022

 Mrs. Feinstein (for herself and Mr. Padilla) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the West Los Angeles Leasing Act of 2016 with respect to the 
                    definition of land use revenue.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEFINITION OF LAND USE REVENUE UNDER WEST LOS ANGELES 
              LEASING ACT OF 2016.

    Section 2(d)(2) of the West Los Angeles Leasing Act of 2016 (Public 
Law 114-226) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``; and'' and 
        inserting a semicolon;
            (2) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as subparagraph (C); 
        and
            (3) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the following new 
        subparagraph:
                    ``(B) any funds received as compensation for an 
                easement described in subsection (e); and''.
                                 <all>
```
Ex-99.1 a)
                        Report of Independent Accountants



To the Board of Directors and Shareholder
  of Bank of America, N.A.


We have examined management's assertion about compliance by BA Mortgage, LLC and
the mortgage division of Bank of America, N.A. (collectively the "Company"),
which together comprise an operating division of Bank of America, N.A., with the
minimum servicing standards identified in the Mortgage Bankers Association of
America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers ("USAP") as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2000 included in the accompanying management
assertion (see Exhibit I). Management is responsible for the Company's
compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance
based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with attestation standards established by
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance
with the minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a
legal determination on the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing
standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December
31, 2000 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ PriceWaterHouseCoopers LLC

January 25, 2001

Ex-99.1 b)

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT


Cendant Mortgage Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion about Cendant Mortgage Corporation's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in the Mortgage
Bankers Association of America's UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE
BANKERS (USAP) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2000 included in the
accompanying management assertion. Management is responsible for Cendant
Mortgage Corporation's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
entity's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about Cendant Mortgage


<PAGE>

Corporation's compliance with the minimum servicing standards and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on Cendant Mortgage
Corporation's compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Cerdant Mortgage Corporation
complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2000 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche

February 9, 2001
EXHIBIT 21.1

                  SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


              NAME                      STATE OF INCORPORATION

American Disposal Services
  of Kansas, Inc.                              Kansas
Tate's Transfer Systems, Inc.                  Missouri
Pittsburgh County Landfill, Inc.               Oklahoma
American Disposal Services of
  Missouri, Inc.                               Oklahoma
County Disposal, Inc.                          Delaware
ADS of Illinois, Inc.                          Illinois
County Disposal (Ohio), Inc.                   Delaware
County Landfill, Inc.                          Delaware
ADS, Inc.                                      Oklahoma
Ross Bros. Waste & Recycling Co., Inc.         Ohio
Bowers - Phase II, Inc.                        Ohio
Allied Waste Systems, Inc.                     Ohio
Packman, Inc.                                  Kansas
R.C. Miller Refuse Service, Inc.               Ohio
Stark Recycling, Inc.                          Ohio
Nimishillen Industrial Park, Inc.              Ohio
Resource Recovery, Inc.                        Kansas
Oklahoma Refuse, Inc.                          Oklahoma
Southwest Waste, Inc.                          Missouri
Shred-All Recycling, Inc.                      Illinois
American Disposal Services of
  Illinois, Inc.                               Delaware
Environtech, Inc.                              Illinois
T&G Container Co., Inc.                        Indiana
Sunset Disposal, Inc.                          Kansas
Fred Barbara Trucking Co., Inc.                Illinois
Illinois Bulk Handlers, Inc.                   Illinois
R.C. Miller Enterprises, Inc.                  Ohio
Tri-State Equipment Sales &
  Service, Inc.                                Ohio
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-11507

Wanhua Chemical US Operations, LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3947 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3947

 To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to permit different tick 
      sizes for emerging growth companies, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 29, 2022

  Mr. Kennedy introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to permit different tick 
      sizes for emerging growth companies, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Intelligent Tick Study Act''.

SEC. 2. TICK SIZES.

    Section 11A(c)(6) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 
78k-1(c)(6)) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(6) Tick Size.--If the Commission determines that the securities 
of emerging growth companies should be quoted and traded using a 
minimum increment of greater than $0.01, the Commission may, by rule, 
designate a minimum increment for the securities of emerging growth 
companies that is greater than $0.01 but not more than $0.25 for use in 
all quoting and trading of securities in any exchange or other 
venue.''.

SEC. 3. REPORT.

    (a) Definition of Security.--In this section, the term ``security'' 
has the meaning given the term in section 3 of the Securities Exchange 
Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c).
    (b) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Securities and Exchange Commission shall conduct a study 
and submit to Congress a report that examines--
            (1) the transition to trading and quoting securities in 
        increments other than $0.01, which includes increments higher 
        and lower than $0.01;
            (2) the impact that the change described in paragraph (1) 
        has had on liquidity and market quality for small, middle, and 
        large capitalization company securities; and
            (3) whether there is sufficient economic incentive to 
        support trading operations in the securities described in 
        paragraph (2) in increments other than $0.01.
                                 <all>
```
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-20-00004-CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding

Tarrant County

Trial Court No. 325-559517-14

Before Gabriel, Womack, and Wallach, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

IN RE D.P., Relator
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the 

opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus is denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered: January 7, 2020
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Abaxis, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: June 14, 2007
    /s/ Alberto R. Santa InesAlberto R. Santa InesChief Financial Officer and Vice President of Finance