alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Lincare Holdings Inc. (the
Company) for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul G. Gabos,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge and
belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and                           
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) |  | information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the Company.
| |    

By:
    /s/ PAULG. GABOSPaul G.
      GabosChief Financial Officer


February 27, 2008

---
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 7, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 12554]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5518]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-5166-3]


Gulf of Mexico Program Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of meeting of the Citizens Advisory Committee of the 
Gulf of Mexico Program.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Gulf of Mexico Program's Citizens Advisory Committee will 
hold a meeting at the Sheraton Corpus Christi Bayfront Hotel, N. 
Shoreline Blvd., Corpus Christi, Texas.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Douglas Lipka, Acting Director, 
Gulf of Mexico Program Office, Building 1103, Room 202, John C. Stennis 
Space Center, Stennis Space Center, MS 39529-6000, at (601) 688-3726.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A meeting of the Citizens Advisory Committee 
of the Gulf of Mexico Program will be held March 29-31, 1995, at the 
Sheraton Corpus Christi Bayfront Hotel, N. Shoreline Blvd., Corpus 
Christi, Texas. The committee will meet from 3:00 to 6:00 p.m. on March 
29, 8:00 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. on March 30, and 8:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. on 
March 31. Agenda items will include: (March 29) Describe Review and 
Evaluation Process for GMP Symposia; Develop Evaluation Form to Insure 
Consistency Among Reviewers; Receive Reports from Session Evaluations; 
Analyze and Critique Evaluation Form; and Assign Members to Specific 
Sessions for Evaluation. (March 30) Assign Members to Specific Sessions 
for Evaluations; Receive and Compile Reports from Session Evaluations; 
and Prepare Preliminary Report. (March 31) Assign Members to Specific 
Sessions for Evaluations; Complete Critique of Symposium; Receive 
Status Report on Key Committee Initiatives, Activities and Issues; 
Develop a Five Year Citizens Advisory Committee Plan; Receive Report on 
Gulf of Mexico Foundation; Develop a CAC Challenge for Next Six Months; 
Amend Bylaws Concerning Quorum; and Elect CAC Officers. The meeting is 
open to the public.
Frederick Kopfler,
Acting Director, Gulf of Mexico Program.
[FR Doc. 95-5518 Filed 3-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                          American Lawyer Media, Inc.

                             345 Park Avenue South
                               New York, NY 10010

               LETTER TO COMMISSION PURSUANT TO TEMPORARY NOTE 3T

May, 14, 2002


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549-0408

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of Regulation S-X, American Lawyer
Media, Inc. has obtained a letter of representation from Arthur Andersen LLP
("Andersen") stating that the March 31, 2002 review was subject to their quality
control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide
reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance with
professional standards, that there was appropriate continuity of Andersen
personnel working on the audit and availability of national office consultation.

                                      Very truly yours,

                                      American Lawyer Media, Inc.


                                      /s/ STEPHEN C. JACOBS
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Stephen C. Jacobs
                                      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         639,448
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,124,383
<ALLOWANCES>                                   117,469
<INVENTORY>                                  4,412,100
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,805,721
<PP&E>                                       3,461,745
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,686,721
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,386,283
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,780,338
<BONDS>                                      3,167,044
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        34,892
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,404,009
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,386,283
<SALES>                                     19,880,012
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,922,110
<CGS>                                       12,864,414
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,042,069
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             185,473
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (305,432)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (305,432)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (33,884)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (339,316)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)
        

</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2479

PTM Corporation:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Exhibit 10.5


 


Benoit le Bourgeois


 


At this time, Atlis employees are compensated on a split salary/equity basis. Your cash compensation will be 70%
of your $140,000.00 annual salary, which equates to $3,769.23 bi-weekly. The remaining 30% of your compensation will be paid by virtue
of a stock award. As a bonus, we will award you an additional 15% stock compensation, so long as we are able. In your case, you will
be awarded 294.06 shares per pay period. Each stock award will become fully vested at the conclusion of each pay period, and we will
issue you an assignment of stock on a quarterly or annual basis. We intend to provide you this benefit for the foreseeable future, but
we reserve the right to revert to a full cash compensation model at any time. At that time and as soon as financially feasible, you will
receive the 30% of your salary that was compensated via stock award.


 


 


To thank you for all that you have done to make ATLIS successful, as communicated in December 2020 you were also
awarded 100 shares that are fully vested.


 


 


 


 


 





	/s/ Benoit le Bourgeois	 
	 
	Employee Signature
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 42 (Friday, March 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 11994]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5196]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Mississippi River Coordinating Commission Meeting

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces an upcoming meeting of the Mississippi 
River Coordinating Commission. Notice of this meeting is required under 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public Law 92-463).

Meeting Date and Time: Wednesday, April 5, 1995; 6:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m.

Addresses: Metropolitan Council Chambers, 230 East Fifth Street, Saint 
Paul, Minnesota.
    An agenda for the meeting will be available by March 15, 1995, from 
the Superintendent of the Mississippi National River and Recreation 
Area at the address below. Public statements about matters related to 
the Mississippi National River and Recreation Area will be taken at the 
meeting.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Mississippi River Coordinating 
Commission was established by P.L. 100-696, November 18, 1988.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Superintendent JoAnn Kyral, 
Mississippi National River and Recreation Area, 175 East Fifth Street, 
Suite 418, St. Paul, MN 55101 (612-290-4160).

    Dated: February 23, 1995.
William W. Schenk,
Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 95-5196 Filed 3-2-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 36 (Thursday, February 23, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 10029-10030]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4345]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

43-CFR Public Land Order 7116

[AK-932-1430-01; AA-58374]


Public Land Order No. 7104, Correction; Partial Revocation of 
Executive Order dated October 8, 1914, as Modified; Alaska

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Public land order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This order will correct an error in the legal description in 
Public Land Order No. 7104.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 23, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sue A. Wolf, BLM Alaska State Office, 
222 W. 7th Avenue, No. 13, Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7599, 907-271-5477.
    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of the Interior 
by Section 204 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, 
43 U.S.C. 1714 (1988), it is ordered as follows:
    The legal description, as stated in Public Land Order No. 7104, 59 
FR 62609, December 6, 1994, is hereby corrected to show the lands 
following the word ``except'' are now being revoked. The changes are as 
follows:
    On page 62609, third column, delete lines 4 through 8. In line 9, 
delete the words ``discharge; except'' and in line 16, delete the word 
``except''.

    [[Page 10030]] Dated: February 6, 1995.
Bob Armstrong
Assistant Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 95-4345 Filed 2-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 16, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00140

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.R.P., ET AL., CHILDREN,

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Atascosa County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13

- 01

- 0023

- CVA Honorable Thomas F. Lee, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant Sondra C .'s second motion for extension of time to fil e brief is hereby GRANTED. Appellant's brief is due on or before June 2, 2014. No further extensions of time will be granted.

_______________ __________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 1 6th day of May, 2014

.

_________________ __________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.6
 
                               November 11, 1996
 
Mr. Iain Calder
6045 N.W. 22nd Avenue
Boca Raton, Florida 33496
 
Dear Iain:
 
     This will confirm the agreement between you and American Media, Inc.
modifying the terms of your Employment Agreement dated November 22, 1995.
 
          1. Section 2 of the Agreement is modified to read as follows:
 
             TERM OF EMPLOYMENT.
 
     Employee's Term of Employment under this Agreement shall continue as set
forth in Paragraph 9 of this Agreement unless earlier terminated as is provided
in paragraph 7 of this Agreement.
 
          2. The first paragraph of Section 9 of the Agreement is modified as
     follows:
 
             TERM OF AGREEMENT AND CONSULTING AGREEMENT.
 
     Effective December 1, 1996 this Agreement shall continue on the same terms
and conditions without a definite termination date. However, either party may
terminate this Agreement by giving six (6) months prior written notice of
termination to the other party. At the expiration of this Agreement as a result
of any such notice, Employer agrees to employ Employee as a Consultant for a
period of two (2) years from the expiration of this Agreement at the rate of
$100,000 per annum (the "Consulting Agreement").
 
     All other terms and conditions of the November 22, 1995 Employment
Agreement which are not inconsistent with the above modifications shall continue
and remain in full force and effect. Please indicate your acceptance to the
above modifications on the enclosed copy of this letter.
 
                                          AMERICAN MEDIA, INC.
 
                                          By:    /s/ MAYNARD RABINOWITZ
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                     Maynard Rabinowitz
                                                       Vice Chairman
 
AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED
 
By:         /s/ IAIN CALDER
    ----------------------------------
               Iain Calder
 
Dated: Nov. 11, 1996
 
                                       40
#### HILLIARD GREEN v. THE WESTERN AND SOUTHERN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, A Corporation, and IMPERIAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, A North Carolina Corporation in process of dissolution.

(Filed 23 September, 1959.)

1. Appeal and Error § 3: Trial § *5%*—

Appeal from a provision of a pretrial order fixing tbe issue and the rule for the admeasurement of damages is premature and will be dismissed, since the trial judge has the discretionary power to modify same. G.S. 1-169.1.

Higgins, J., not sitting.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Pless, J.,*June 1959 regular civil term. BunCOMbe.

Civil action to recover damages for an alleged unlawfúl and tor-tious liquidation and dissolution of the Imperial Life Insurance Company, over the dissent of plaintiff, a minority stockholder.

At a pre-trial hearing (G.S. 1-169.1) the court entered an order *731that one issue should be submitted to the jury: “What amount of damage is the plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendant?” In the pre-trial order the court went further, and held what the rule of damages would be and the maximum' possible recovery, and gave an explanation for its holding. The last sentence of the pre-trial order reads: “This statement is for the information of the trial judge, and is not intended to constitute a ruling.”

Plaintiff excepted to the pre-trial order, and appealed to the Supreme Court.

*William J. Cocke for plaintiff, appellant.*

*Uzzell & DuMont By: William B. Greene for defendants, appellees.*

Per Curiam.

G.S. 1-169.1, in respect to Pre-Trial Hearings, reads in part: “Following the hearing the presiding judige shall enter an order reciting the stipulations made and the action taken. Such order shall control the subsequent course of the case unless in the discretion of the trial judge the ends of justice require its modification.”

Judge Pless’ pre-trial order is interlocutory, from which an appeal does not lie. The appeal is dismissed, but without prejudice to plaintiff’s exception to the order, and to his rights in accordance with procedure and law in such oases. *DeBruhl v. Highway Com.,*241 N.C. 616, 86 S.E. 2d 200.

Appeal Dismissed.

Higgins, J., not sitting.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CEO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with Form 10-Q/A Amendment No. 1 of POZEN Inc. (the Company), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), I, John R. Plachetka, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                            
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------
|Date: February 21, 2014 |  |  |  |                            
|                        |  |  |  | /s/ John R. Plachetka      
|                        |  |  |  | John R. Plachetka, Pharm.D.
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer    

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2471

Northern Tool & Equipment:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
#### STATE v. JOHN ASTER RIVES.

(Filed 23 September, 1931.)

Criminal Law *Jj*a — Appeal in capital case will be dismissed when not prosecuted according to Rules, no error appearing on face of record.

Where the defendant convicted of a capital offense gives notice of appeal, but nothing is done toward perfecting the same, the State’s motion to docket and dismiss the appeal will be allowed, no error appearing upon the face of the record proper.

*344MotioN by *the State to*docket and dismiss appeal.

*Attorney-General Brummiit and Assistant Attorney-General Seawell for the State.*

Stacy, O. J.

At tbe May Term, 1931, Chatham Superior Court, the defendant herein, John Aster Rives, was tried upon an indictment charging him with the murder of one John Headen, which resulted in a conviction and sentence of death. His confederate, Ben G-oldston, was tried at the previous January Term on a separate bill of indictment. *S. v. Goldston, ante,*89.

The prisoner gave notice of appeal to the Supreme Court, and was allowed 60 days within which to make out and serve his statement of case on appeal, but nothing has been done towards perfecting the appeal.

As no error appears on the face of the record proper, the motion to docket and dismiss must be allowed. *S. v. Hayeslipps,*199 N. C., 636, 155 S. E., 927; *Pruitt v. Wood,*199 N. C., 788, 156 S. E., 126.

Appeal dismissed.