alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

          - 50 CFR Parts 216 and 300
          - RIN 0648-AX63

# AGENCY:

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The National Marine Fisheries Service published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         of February 8, 2016, concerning a public webinar to present details of a previously issued proposed rule (which published December 29, 2015) for electronic filing of seafood trade documents. The document contained an incorrect date for the webinar.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mark Wildman, Office of International Affairs and Seafood Inspection; telephone: (301) 427-8350.

## Correction

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of February 8, 2016, in FR Doc. 2016-02418, on page 6489, in the first column, correct the                         **DATES**                         caption to read:                    

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Wednesday, February 17, 2016, from 3 p.m. until 4 p.m. eastern standard time. Written comments on the proposed rule (December 29, 2015; 80 FR 81251) must be received by February 29, 2016.

Dated: February 8, 2016.

Jeffrey Weir,

Acting Director, Office for International Affairs and Seafood Inspection, National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 2016-03053 Filed 2-11-16; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3884 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3884

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 404 U.S. Highway 41 North in Baraga, Michigan, as the ``Cora 
                    Reynolds Anderson Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 21, 2022

  Mr. Peters (for himself and Ms. Stabenow) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 404 U.S. Highway 41 North in Baraga, Michigan, as the ``Cora 
                    Reynolds Anderson Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CORA REYNOLDS ANDERSON POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 404 U.S. Highway 41 North in Baraga, Michigan, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Cora Reynolds Anderson Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Cora 
Reynolds Anderson Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
----

**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

     The undersigned, Jianquan Li, Chief Financial Officer of HONG KONG WINALITE GROUP, INC. (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

     1. The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

     2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this 14th day of November 2008.

/s/ Jianquan Li                                                Jianquan Li Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hong Kong Winalite Group, Inc. and will be retained by Hong Kong Winalite Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

----
1 

CAUSE NO. DC13-13916 

IN RE: ANCILLARY RECEIVERSHIP OF § IN THE DISTRICT COURT 

UNITED STATES INSTALLMENT REALTY § 

COMPANY, A MINNESOTA CORPORATION, § 

 § 

(Ancillary to the General Receivership § 

of United States Installment Realty Company, § DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS 

a Minnesota corporation, and U.S.I. Realty § 

Company, a Minnesota corporation, in § 

In re Receivership of United States Installment § 

Realty Company, a Minnesota corporation, § 

No. 27-CV-13-4154, Fourth Judicial § 

District Court, Hennepin County, Minnesota) § 101ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

BURLINGTON RESOURCES OIL & GAS COMPANY LP’S 

NOTICE OF APPEAL 

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: 

 Please take notice that Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Company LP (“Burlington”) 

desires to appeal from the Order Approving Ancillary Receiver’s Final Report and Discharging 

Ancillary Receiver, and Denying Intervenor’s Plea to the Jurisdiction dated December 19, 2014, 

which finally disposes of all pending claims asserted by all parties in this proceeding 

(hereinafter, the “Final Judgment”). Burlington further desires to appeal from any and all orders 

incorporated, subsumed or merged into the Final Judgment, as well as from any and all previous 

adverse orders entered in this proceeding. The trial court never had jurisdiction, as a result, any 

and all orders entered in this proceeding are void. Burlington desires to appeal to the Court of 

Appeals for the Fifth District, sitting in Dallas. 

 

FILED

DALLAS COUNTY

1/5/2015 12:06:08 PM

FELICIA PITRE

DISTRICT CLERK

ACCEPTED

05-15-00014-CV

FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS

DALLAS, TEXAS

1/7/2015 9:05:26 AM

LISA MATZ

CLERK

05-15-00014-CV

 FILED IN 5th COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 1/7/2015 9:05:26 AM LISA MATZ Clerk
2 

Dated: January 5, 2015 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ W. Scott Hastings 

Michael V. Powell 

 Texas Bar No. 16204400 

W. Scott Hastings 

 Texas Bar No. 24002241 

Susan E. Adams 

 Texas Bar No. 24059354 

LOCKE LORD LLP 

2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 2200 

Dallas, Texas 75201-6776 

Main Telephone: (214) 740-8000 

Main Facsimile: (214) 740-8800 

ATTORNEYS FOR INTERVENOR, 

BURLINGTON RESOURCES OIL & GAS 

COMPANY L.P. 

 
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I certify that true and correct copies of the foregoing have been served this the 5th day of 

January, 2015, on all counsel of record via email and certified mail, return receipt requested, as 

follows: 

Mr. Timothy E. Malone 

DECKER, JONES, MCMACKIN, MCCLANE, HALL & BATES, P.C. 

Burnett Plaza, Unit 46 

801 Cherry Street, Suite 2000 

Fort Worth, Texas 76102 

Attorneys for Verde Minerals, LLC 

Mr. Jeffrey R. Ansel 

WINTHROP & WEINSTINE, P.A. 

Capella Tower, Suite 3500 

225 South Sixth Street 

Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 

Attorneys for Lighthouse Management Group, Inc., 

as General Receive for United States Installment Realty 

Company and for U.S.I. Realty Company

Mr. David Weiner 

One Lincoln Center 

5400 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1260 

Dallas, Texas 75240 

Ancillary Receiver in Texas for United States 

Installment Realty Company and for U.S.I. Realty 

Company 

/s/ W. Scott Hastings 

W. Scott Hastings
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-54398, 333-07515, 333-43547, 333-56697, 333-32118 and 333-62714 and
333-116431 on Form S-8 and No. 333-96369 on Form S-3 of Metretek Technologies,
Inc. (f.k.a. Marcum Natural Gas Services, Inc.) of our report dated March 25,
2004 (March 10, 2005 as to the effects of the discontinued operations described
in Note 3 and the adoption of EITF 03-6, "Participating Securities and the
Two-Class Method Under FASB Statement No. 128" described in Note 1), which
report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph
relating to the discontinued operations described in Note 3 and the adoption of
EITF 03-6 described in Note 1 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Metretek Technologies, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Denver, Colorado
March 18, 2005
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Lawyer Media Holdings, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
William L. Pollak, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Eric F.
Lundberg, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that: (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company. /s/ WILLIAM L. POLLAKWilliam L. PollakPresident
and Chief Executive OfficerMay 12, 2004/s/ ERIC F. LUNDBERGEric F. LundbergVice
President and Chief Financial OfficerMay 12, 2004
 This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>            5
<MULTIPLIER>         1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,803
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   73,505
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,520
<INVENTORY>                                      6,606
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                95,925
<PP&E>                                           9,200
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,787
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 268,897
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          125,227
<BONDS>                                         48,798
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           282
<OTHER-SE>                                      61,645
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   268,897
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               671,061
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  245,960
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               409,349
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,506
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,246
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,901
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,345
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,345
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.31



</TABLE>
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed 

September 27, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00364-CR

TREASURE SMITH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from County Criminal Court at Law No. 12

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2339436

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant was convicted of assault of a family member. Subsequently, the 

trial court granted appellant’s motion for new trial.

Generally, we only have jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a criminal 

defendant when there has been a final judgment of conviction. See Workman v. 

State, 170 Tex. Crim. App. 621, 343 S.W.2d 446, 447 (1961); McKown v. State, 
2

915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App. – Fort Worth 1996, no pet.). Because appellant 

has been granted a new trial, there is no final conviction to appeal. 

We grant appellant’s motion to dismiss and dismiss the appeal for want of 

jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Spain, Poissant, and Wilson

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 42 (Friday, March 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 11952]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5283]



========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 42 / Friday, March 3, 1995 / 
Notices
[[Page 11952]]

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Foreign Agricultural Service


Meeting of Advisory Committee on Emerging Democracies

AGENCY: Foreign Agricultural Service.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the third meeting of the Advisory 
Committee on Emerging Democracies will be held March 23-24, 1995. The 
purpose of the committee is to provide information and advice, based 
upon knowledge and expertise of the members, useful to the U.S. 
Department of Agriculture (USDA) in implementing the program on sharing 
agricultural expertise with emerging democracies. The committee will 
also advise USDA on ways to increase the involvement of the U.S. 
private sector in cooperative work with emerging democracies in food 
and rural business systems.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, March 23, 1995 from 9:00 a.m. 
to 5:30 p.m., and Friday, March 24 from 10:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. Both 
meetings will be held at the U.S. Department of Agriculture in 
Washington, DC.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The minutes of the meeting announced in this 
Notice shall be available for review. The meeting is open to the public 
and members of the public may provide comments in writing to Douglas 
Freeman, Foreign Agricultural Service, room 6506 South Building, U.S. 
Department of Agriculture, 14th and Independence Ave. SW., Washington, 
DC 20250, but should not make any oral comments at the meeting unless 
invited to do so by the Co-chairpersons.

    Signed at Washington, DC, February 24, 1995.
Timothy J. Galvin,
Acting Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service.
[FR Doc. 95-5283 Filed 3-2-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-10-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-10520

Tech-Long, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Ex-99.4
Aggregate Statement of Principal and Interest Distribution to
Certificatesholders.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
    Class           Interest           Principle            Losses           Ending Balance
    -----           --------           ---------            ------           --------------
<S>                   <C>                  <C>                         <C>       <C>
1_B_1                 207,200.65           42,362.82                   -         3,291,936.62
1_B_2                  60,946.78           12,460.78                   -           968,302.58
1_B_3                  30,467.26            6,229.13                   -           484,053.87
1_B_4                  36,568.07            7,476.44                   -           580,981.58
1_B_5                  12,189.36            2,492.15                   -           193,660.52
1_B_6                  18,283.12            3,738.03                   -           290,476.17
1_P                            -           20,208.17                   -            53,354.02
1A1                 8,607,426.99       26,932,155.64                   -       123,324,025.70
1A2                   185,163.31          799,157.86                   -         2,731,103.71
1A3                 1,242,403.08                   -                   -        19,878,450.00
1X                    288,859.94                   -                   -                    -
2_B_1                 173,947.39          138,634.41                   -         2,763,899.54
2_B_2                  86,973.67           69,317.20                   -         1,381,949.77
2_B_3                  43,489.68           34,660.89                   -           691,020.17
2_B_4                  34,791.77           27,728.69                   -           552,816.17
2_B_5                  26,088.11           20,791.99                   -           414,521.49
2_B_6                  26,097.40           20,799.38                   -           414,669.14
2A1                 1,054,579.68        2,243,401.23                   -        15,915,597.24
2A2                13,986,666.13       27,959,365.92                   -       212,126,613.76
2A3                    67,681.20                   -                   -         1,105,000.00
PO                             -           43,176.22                   -           489,721.65
R_1                            -                   -                   -                    -
R_2                            -                   -                   -                    -
R_3                            -                   -                   -                    -
X                     482,923.25                   -                   -                    -
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT  32.1


                        NEOMETRIX TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Neometrix Technology Group,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Richard McClearn, the President and Director of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/  RICHARD MCCLEARN
-----------------------------------
Richard McClearn
President and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
September 15, 2003
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Retirement Age | Description of Proposed Provision:      Index benefits to longevity after the normal retirement age (NRA) reaches age 67 under current law.  Under current law, the NRA reaches 67 for individuals who attain age 62 in 2022 and later.  Under this provision, the NRA would be further increased by one month for those attaining age 62 in every other year after 2022. |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2008 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified July 16, 2008 |