Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 8, 1995 / Notices 12815

Petitioner: Mr. Robert E. Salmen

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

121.383(c)

Description of Relief Sought: To permit

Mr. Salmen to be a pilot in operations

conducted under part 121 of the FAR

after reaching his 60th birthday.

Docket No.: 28035

Petitioner: Mr. Richard E. Randle

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

121.383(c)

Description of Relief Sought: To permit

Mr. Randle to act as a pilot in

operations conducted under part 121

of the FAR after reaching his 60th

birthday.

Docket No.: 28036

Petitioner: Mr. Kenneth A. Urdahl

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

121.383(c)

Description of Relief Sought: To permit

Mr. Urdahl to be a pilot in operations

conducted under part 121 of the FAR

after reaching his 60th birthday.

Docket No.: 28065

Petitioner: Mr. Russell C. Hazelton

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

121.383(c)

Description of Relief Sought: To permit

Mr. Hazelton to act as a pilot in

operations conducted under part 121

of the FAR after reaching his 60th

birthday.

Docket No.: 28075

Petitioner: Chelan County Fire District 1

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

parts 1 and 11; SFAR 38–2

Description of Relief Sought: To allow

Chelan County to continue to operate

its Bell UH–1B helicopter in a public

aircraft status. The petitioner requests

this exemption pursuant to the Public

Aircraft Definition and Exemption

Authority rule.

Dispositions of Petitions

Docket No.: 27122

Petitioner: Air Tractor, Inc.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

61.31(a)(1)

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To extend Exemption No.

5651, as amended, which permits Air

Tractor, Inc., and pilots of the Air

Tractor models AT–802 and AT–802A

to operate these airplanes without

holding a type rating, although

maximum gross weight of these

airplanes exceeds 12,500 pounds.

Grant, January 18, 1995, Exemption

No. 5651B

Docket No.: 27966

Petitioner: Reeve Aleution Airways, Inc.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

121.356(a)

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To allow Reeve Aleution

Airway, Inc., permanent exemption

from § 121.356(a) of the FAR to the

extent necessary to permit Reeve

Aleution to operate its three

remaining Lockheed L–188 aircraft

within the State of Alaska, after April

1, 1995, without installation of TCAS

II technology. Denial, February 16,

1995, Exemption No. 6030

Docket No.: 27845

Petitioner: Learjet Inc.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

25.571(e)(1)

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Learjet Inc., to

be exempt from the 4-pound bird

strike requirement of § 25.571(e)(1)

from Vc at sea level to 8,000 feet in

favor of Vc at sea level or .85 Vc at

8,000 feet, whichever is greater.

Partial Grant, January 26, 1995,

Exemption No. 6021

[FR Doc. 95–5638 Filed 3–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

[Summary Notice No. PE–95–10]

Petitions for Exemption: Summary of

Petitions Received; Dispositions of

Petitions Issued

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of petitions for

exemption received and of dispositions

of prior petitions.

SUMMARY: Pursuant to FAA’s rulemaking

provisions governing the application,

processing, and disposition of petitions

for exemption (14 CFR Part 11), this

notice contains a summary of certain

petitions seeking relief from specified

requirements of the Federal Aviation

Regulations (14 CFR Chapter I),

dispositions of certain petitions

previously received, and corrections.

The purpose of this notice is to improve

the public’s awareness of, and

participation in, this aspect of FAA’s

regulatory activities. Neither publication

of this notice nor the inclusion or

omission of information in the summary

is intended to affect the legal status of

any petition or its final disposition.

DATES: Comments on petitions received

must identify the petition docket

number involved and must be received

on or before March 28, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on any

petition in triplicate to: Federal

Aviation Administration, Office of the

Chief Counsel, Attn: Rule Docket (AGC–

200), Petition Docket No. llllll,

800 Independence Avenue, SW.,

Washington, D.C. 20591.

The petition, any comments received,

and a copy of any final disposition are

filed in the assigned regulatory docket

and are available for examination in the

Rules Docket (AGC–200), Room 915G,

FAA Headquarters Building (FOB 10A),

800 Indpendence Avenue, SW.,

Washington, D.C. 20591; telephone

(202) 267–3132.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.

D. Michael Smith, Office of Rulemaking

(ARM–1), Federal Aviation

Administration, 800 Independence

Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591;

telephone (202) 267–7470.

This notice is published pursuant to

paragraphs (c), (e), and (g) of § 11.27 of

Part 11 of the Federal Aviation

Regulations (14 CFR Part 11).

Issued in Washington, DC, on February 27,

1995.

Donald P. Byrne,

Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations.

Petitions for Exemption

Docket No.: 24466

Petitioner: Air Transport Association

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

121.485

Description of Relief Sought: To extend

Exemption No. 4317, as amended,

which permits member carriers of the

Air Transport Association to conduct

flights of fewer than 12 hours

duration with an airplane having a

crew of three or more pilots and an

additional flight crewmember without

requiring the rest period following

that flight to be twice the hours flown

since the last rest period at his/her

home base.

Docket No.: 28010

Petitioner: General Electric Company

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

21.128(a)(2)

Description of Relief Sought: To permit

General Electric to deliver certain pretype-certificated prototype engines

(CFM56–5C4) manufactured and

assembled under conformity

configuration control, without

subjecting the engine to a test run that

includes at least 5 hours of operation

at rated maximum continuous power

or thrust. For engines having a rated

takeoff power or thrust higher than

rated maximum continuous power or

thrust, the 5-hour run must include 30

minutes at rated takeoff power or

thrust.

Dispositions of Petitions

Docket No.: 23453

Petitioner: Hawaiian Airlines

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

108.5(a)(1)

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Hawaiian

Airlines to utilize its DC–9 aircraft

without a security program that meets

the requirements of § 108.7. The DC–
12816 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 8, 1995 / Notices

9 aircraft would be a last minute

replacement for its DASH–7

equipment. Hawaiian Airlines has

confirmed that this exemption is no

longer necessary; therefore, this

current exemption documents the

termination of the original exemption.

Termination, February 8, 1995,

Exemption No. 3796A

Docket No.: 23980

Petitioner: United States Hang Gliding

Association, Inc.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

103.1

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To amend Exemption No.

4144, as amended, which allows

unpowered ultralight vehicles to be

towed aloft by powered ultralight

vehicles operated by individuals

authorized by the United States Hang

Gliding Association, Inc. The

amendment would have allowed an

increase to the weight limit for singleplace powered ultralight vehicles,

used in air-to-air towing operations

only, up to 360 pounds empty weight.

Additionally, this petition would

have allowed an increase to the

weight limit for two-place powered

ultralight vehicles, used in air-to-air

towing operations only, up to 496

pounds empty weight. Exemption No.

4144, as amended, stand as is; the

amendment is denied. Denied,

February 10, 1995, Exemption No.

6024

Docket No.: 26067

Petitioner: SimuFlite Training

International

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

appendix H of part 121; 135.293;

135.297; 135.299; 135.303;

135.337(a)(2), (a)(3), and (b)(2); and

135.339(a)(2), (b), and (c)

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To extend and amend

Exemption No. 5187B, which permits

SimuFlite, subject to certain

conditions and limitations, to use its

qualified instructor pilots or pilot

check airmen in approved simulators

to train and check the pilots of part

135 certificate holders that contract

with SimuFlite for training. The

amendment restores the conditions

and limitations that existed prior to

the issuance of Exemption No. 5187B,

except for some minor clarifications.

Grant, February 2, 1995, Exemption

No. 5187C

Docket No.: 26302

Petitioner: FlightSafety International

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

appendix H of part 121; 135.293;

135.297; 135.299; 135.337(a)(2), (a)(3),

and (b)(2); and 135.339(a)(2), (b), and

(c)

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To extend and amend

Exemption No. 5241D, which permits

FlightSafety International (FSI),

subject to certain conditions and

limitations, to use its qualified

instructor pilots or pilot check airmen

in approved simulators to train and

check the pilots of part 135 certificate

holders that contract with FSI for

training. The amendment restores the

conditions and limitations that

existed prior to the issuance of

Exemption No. 5241D, except for

some minor clarifications. Grant,

February 1, 1995, Exemption No.

5241E

Docket No.: 27121

Petitioner: Tower Air

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

appendix H of part 121

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To extend and amend

Exemption No. 5596, as amended,

which allows Tower Air to provide

initial or upgrade training and

checking in a Phase II (Level C)

simulator and allows certain

experienced pilots and flight

engineers who have received training

in a Phase II (Level C) simulator to be

B747 seconds in command (SIC) in

accordance with the training and

checking provisions permitted under

Phase III (Level D) of appendix H. The

amendment revises the exemption to

permit former military pilots with

large turbojet experience to be trained

and checked in a B747 Phase II (Level

C) simulator without receiving any

training or checking in the actual

aircraft. Grant, February 3, 1995,

Exemption No. 5596C

Docket No.: 27947

Petitioner: Jet Support Systems, Inc.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

135.165(b)(6) and (7)

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To allow Jet Support

Systems, Inc., to operate turbojet

aircraft in extended overwater

operations equipped with one high

frequency communication system.

Grant, February 8, 1995, Exemption

No. 6026

Docket No.: 27968

Petitioner: Corporate Air

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

121.345(c)(2) and 135.143(c)(2)

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Corporate Air

to operate without a TSO–C112 (Mode

S) transponder installed on its aircraft

operating under the provision of parts

121 and 135. Grant, February 7, 1995,

Exemption No. 6025

Docket No.: 27960

Petitioner: Atlas Air Inc.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

appendix H of part 121

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To extend and amend

Exemption No. 5888, which allows

Atlas Air Inc., to provide initial or

upgrade training and checking in a

Phase II (Level C) simulator and

allows certain experienced pilots and

flight engineers who have received

training in a Phase II (Level C)

simulator to be B–747 seconds in

command (SIC) in accordance with

the training and checking provisions

permitted under Phase III (Level D) of

appendix H. The amendment revises

paragraph 4.a of the conditions and

limitations to require two manual

takeoffs and landings instead of the

four manual takeoffs and landings

currently required. Partial Grant,

February 3, 1995, Exemption No.

5888A

Docket No.: 28058

Petitioner: Blackhawk International

Airways

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

135.143(c)(2)

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Blackhawk

International Airways to operate

without a TSO–C112 (Mode S)

transponder installed on its aircraft

operating under the provisions of part

135. Grant, February 3, 1995,

Exemption No. 6022

Docket No.: 27859

Petitioner: Professional Airline

Training, Inc.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

61.55(b)(2); 61.56(c)(1); 61.57(c) and

(d); 61.58(c)(1) and (d); 61.63(c)(2)

and (d)(2) and (3); 61.65(c), (e)(2) and

(3), and (g); 61.67(d)(2); 61.157(d)(1)

and (2) and (e)(1) and (2); 61.191(c);

and appendix A of part 61

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Professional

Airline Training, Inc., to use FAAapproved simulators to meet certain

flight experience requirements of part

61 of the FAR. Grant, February 3,

1995, Exemption No. 5988

[FR Doc. 95–5637 Filed 3–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

Notice of Intent To Rule on Application

To Use the Revenues From a

Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) at

Albany County Airport, Albany, NY

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Correction to notice of intent to

rule on application to use the revenues

from a passenger facility charge (PFC) at