alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-7096

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JOTHAM RAFAEL SIMMONS, a/k/a Johnathan Rashad Simmons,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:12-cr-00910-RBH-1; 4:17-cv-00562-

RBH)

Submitted: November 21, 2017 Decided: November 28, 2017

Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jotham Simmons, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States 

Attorney, Florence, South Carolina; Stanley D. Ragsdale, Assistant United States 

Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jotham Simmons seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 

U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the 

merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 

336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner 

must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the 

motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 

484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Simmons has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny 

leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1648

EQI, Ltd: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 41 (Thursday, March 2, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 11680]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5120]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Notice of Changes in Status of an Extended Benefit (EB) Period 
for the State of Alaska

    This notice announces a change in benefit period eligibility under 
the EB Program for the State of Alaska.

Summary

    The following changes have occurred since the publication of the 
last notice regarding States' EB status:

<bullet> January 29, 1995--Alaska's 13-week insured unemployment rate 
for the week ending January 14, 1995 exceeded 6.0 percent, causing the 
State to trigger ``on'' EB effective January 29, 1995.

Information for Claimants

    The duration of benefits payable in the EB Program, and the terms 
and conditions on which they are payable, are governed by the Federal-
State Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 1970, as amended, and 
the operating instructions issued to the States by the U.S. Department 
of Labor. In the case of a State beginning an EB period, the State 
employment security agency will furnish a written notice of potential 
entitlement to each individual who has exhausted all rights to regular 
benefits and is potentially eligible for EB (20 CFR 615.13(c)(1)).
    Persons who believe they may be entitled to EB, or who wish to 
inquire about their rights under the programs, should contact the 
nearest State employment service office or unemployment compensation 
claims office in their locality.

    Signed at Washington, DC, on February 23, 1995.
Doug Ross,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Employment and Training.
[FR Doc. 95-5120 Filed 3-1-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of ChemTrak Incorporated
from the year ended December 31, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       4,125,000
<SECURITIES>                                   567,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  485,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    540,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               320,000
<PP&E>                                       2,738,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,841,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,381,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,000
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,018
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,841,000
<SALES>                                      2,463,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               598,000
<CGS>                                        3,201,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,201,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,870,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             875,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,826,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,826,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,826,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.77)
        

</TABLE>
#### In the matter of the custody of LARRY WICKER and NANCY WICKER.

(Filed 23 November, 1960.)

Appeal by respondent (Lloyd Wicker) from order of *Williams, Resident Judge,*signed July 2, 1960, from Lee.

*Habeas Corpus*proceeding under G.S. 17-39 to determine, in a contest between Nellie Yow Wicker, petitioner, and Lloyd Wicker, respondent, husband and wife living in a state of separation without being divorced, the custody of the two children of the marriage, namely,, Larry Wicker, age 12, and Nancy Wicker, age 9.

Hearings, on affidavits offered by petitioner and respondent, were held June 11, 1960, and June 18, 1960. By order of July 2, 1960, the court, based on findings of fact set forth therein, awarded custody to petitioner during specified periods and to respondent during other specified periods.

Respondent excepted and appealed.

*Gavin, Jackson, Gavin & Williams! for petitioner, appellee.*

*Seawell & Wooten and Hoyle & Hoyle for respondent, appellant.*

PER Cueiam.

All findings of fact necessary to support the order of July 2, 1960, are supported by evidence, including the finding “that the best interests and best welfare of both of said children demands that their care, custody and control be committed to the partial custody and control of both the father and mother, and said custody be divided into different periods in the way and manner” set forth with particularity; and careful consideration of each of respondent’s assignments of error fails to disclose error of law in respect of said order.

Affirmed.
COURT REPORTER'S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

THIS RECORD IS DUE ON \- -l5 

THIS RECORD WAS ORIGINALLY DUE ON \ -31-114 

I AM REQUESTING O DAYS

THIS RECORD IS APPROXIMATELY tACO PAGES LONG

IS THIS APPEAL ACCELERATED? YES VIC-10

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS CAUSE NO. 0 lo -1 14 — \ kO -CP )), Olo -11 no \ - \ 1-1-C2-

STYLE OF CASE: (1054_Ll

TRIAL COURT ,361-0() 

TRIAL COURT CAUSE NO. al

I am responsible for preparing a record in this appeal, but am unable to file the record by the

original due date for the following reason(s): (Check all that apply — attach additional pages if necessary.)

1:1 To the best of my knowledge, the Appellant has made no claim of indigence, or has been

found to be not indigent, and has failed to either pay the required fee or to make

arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the record.

My duties listed below preclude working on this record: \JOnf Y nr; nn nthpf

.04,74)tiM AM -Scfnr15(6)9 OM 50 \nn,\)-0 ,nnt 

Otoreck cryn ioNF, one, 

LI Other (explain):

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 1/8/2015 10:22:09 AM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
In compliance with TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5(e), I certify that a copy of this notice has been served on

counsel for all parties to the trial court's judgment or order being appealed. I further certify by

my signature below that the information contained in this notice is true and within my personal

knowledge.

\--- -‘5

Date

qa3 - LIO g - 

Office Phone Number

E-mail address (if available)

The following parties have been served

(Information may be either printed or typed.)

Lead Counsel for Appellant(s):

Name: LJa0y, 91A CC 

Address: PO \.9.DOV \\ 

\ \ Q 151-03

ch\\Q ICCO'ff\an

Printed Name

Cs) uf yorktr

Official Title

Lead Counsel for Appellee(s):

Name: Lel f (1 wkoenno 

Address: ?c:3 ly))/ 091 

Cavegn\A\\L nlS 140t5 

Phone No. go3 - 140R — WO 

Attorney for: c<Ayik 

with a copy of this document:

FAX TO: Molly Pate (Deputy Criminal Clerk) or Kim Robinson (Deputy Civil Clerk)

Sixth Court of Appeals, Texarkana, at

903 798-3034

(to be followed by a printed version by mail)
# U n i t e d S t a t e s C o u r t o f A pp e a l s For the Eig hth Circu it

_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ No . 1 9 -1 9 95

_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ M at th ew Bo i v in
ll l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l lPl a in t i

f f - Ap p el l an t

v
. As a Hu t ch i n so n , Ark an s as Go v ern o r, In d i v i du al l y an di n Offi ci al Cap aci t i es ; Ben ny M ag n es s , Di rect o r-- Bo ardo f Co rrect i o n , In d i v i du al l y an di n Offi ci al Cap aci t i es ; W en dy

Kel l ey , Di rect o r-- Dep art m en to f Co rrect i o n , In d i v idu al l y an d i n Offi ci al Cap aci ti es l l l l l l ll l l l l l l l l l l l l lDef

en d a n t s - Ap p el l ees

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Ap p eal fro m

Un i t edSt at es Di s t ri ctCo u rt fo r th e Eas t ern Di s t ri cto f Ark an s as - Li t t l e Ro ck

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Subm i t t ed : J an u ary

1 5 , 2 0 2 0 Fi l ed : J an u ary

2 1 , 2 02 0 [Un pub l is h ed ]

_ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ Befo re GRUENDER, BEAM , an dKELLY, Ci rcu i tJ u d ges
.

_ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ PER CURIAM

.Ark an s as i n m at e M at t h ew Bo i v i n ap peal s t he di s t ri ct co urt ’ s 1 d i s m is s al o f h i s

p ro s e 4 2 U.S.C. § 1 9 83 co m p l ai n t

. Aft er carefu l rev i ew o f t he reco rd an d t h e p art i es ’ arg u m en t s o n ap p eal , w e co n cl u d e t h a t d i s m i ss al w as pro p er. S ee Kel l y v. Ci t y of Oma h a , 8 1 3 F.3 d 1 0 7 0, 1 0 7 5 (8 t h C i r. 2 01 6 ) (rev i ewi n g Fed

. R. Ci v
. P. 1 2 (b )(6 ) d i s m i s s al d e n o v o ). Acco rd i ng l y , we affi rm
. S ee 8 th Ci r. R. 4 7B.

__ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _

1 Th e Ho n orab l e Bi l l y Ro y W i l s o n , Un it ed St at es D i s t ri ct J u d g e fo r t h e Eas t ern Di s t ri ct o f Ark an s as , ad o p t i ng t h e re p o r t an d reco m m en d at i o n s o f t h e H o n o rab l e P atr ic ia S. Harri s, U ni t ed St at es M ag i s t rat e J u d g e fo r t he Eas t ern Di st ri ct o f Ark an s as
. -2

-
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-11-00157-CV

Susan Combs, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas; and Greg Abbott,

Attorney General of the State of Texas, Appellants

v.

Frito Lay, Inc., Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 201ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-08-004051, HONORABLE SUZANNE COVINGTON, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellants have filed a unopposed motion to dismiss their appeal. We grant the

motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).

____________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Rose

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: April 7, 2011
EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                     906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Murray Wilson, President and Chief Financial Officer of Ciro International,
Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended
June 31, 2001 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: June 11, 2003

/s/ Murray Wilson
-----------------
    Murray Wilson
    President and Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
Exhibit 10.1




Summary of Compensation Arrangements with Executive Officers and Directors


as of March 25, 2011





On March 25, 2011, the Special Committee of the Board of Directors of Generex Biotechnology Corporation (the “Company”) consisting of John P. Barratt, Nola E. Masterson and Brian T. McGee unanimously approved the recommendations of the Compensation Committee as to the following compensatory arrangements with respect to the Company’s named executive officers and directors.





As compensation for his services as the Company’s Chief Operating Officer, Dr. David Brusegard will be paid an annual base compensation of $225,000 with benefits and vacation, effective as of March 25, 2011.





In consideration of his services as Acting Chief Financial Officers, Stephen Fellows received an increase of $25,000 in his annual base salary for a total of $225,000, effective as of January 1, 2011.





In consideration of his services as Chairman of the Board, John P. Barratt received a fee increase in an amount equal to $38,000 per annum, retroactive to October 1, 2010.





Grants of options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock were awarded to executive officers and non-employee directors as follows:





Employee or Non-Employee Director

Options to Purchase Shares of

Common StockJohn P. Barratt

500,000Brian T. McGee

200,000Nola E. Masterson

200,000Mark A. Fletcher

1,500,000Dr. David Brusegard

200,000Stephen Fellows

200,000





The stock options have an exercise price equal to $0.282 per share, the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the OTC Bulletin Board on March 25, 2011. The grants were made pursuant to the terms of the Company’s 2001 and 2006 Stock Plans. The options awarded are all fully vested and shall expire on the fifth anniversary of the date of grant, subject to earlier termination under the terms set forth in the 2001 and 2006 Stock Plans.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

October 18, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2084

Bridgestone Industrial Products America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 5 (Monday, January 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2375-2376]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-457]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[Order No. 726]


Approval for Manufacturing Authority; Lear Seating Corporation 
(Automobile Seat Sets) Within Foreign-Trade Zone 38; Spartanburg 
County, SC

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, Sec. 400.28(a)(2) of the Board's regulations, requires 
approval of the Board prior to commencement of new manufacturing/
processing activity within existing zone facilities;
    Whereas, the South Carolina States Port Authority, grantee of FTZ 
38, has requested authority under Sec. 400.32(b)(1) of the Board's 
regulations on behalf of the Lear Seating Corporation, for authority to 
manufacture automobile seat sets under zone procedures within FTZ 38, 
Spartanburg County, South Carolina (filed 8-31-94, FTZ Docket A(32b1)-
3-94; Doc. 43-94, assigned 12-19-94);
    Whereas, pursuant to Sec. 400.32(b)(1), the Commerce Department's 
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration has the authority to act 
for the Board in making such decisions on new manufacturing/processing 
activity under certain circumstances, including situations where the 
proposed activity is similar to activity recently approved by the Board 
(Sec. 400.32(b)(1)(i)); and,
    Whereas, the FTZ Staff has reviewed the proposal, taking into 
account the criteria of Sec. 400.31, and the Executive Secretary has 
recommended approval;
    Now, therefore, the Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, 
acting for the Board pursuant to Sec. 400.32(b)(1), concurs in the 
recommendation and hereby approves the request subject to the Act and 
the Board's regulations, including Sec. 400.28.

    [[Page 2376]] Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of 
December 1994.
Barbara R. Stafford,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, 
Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

    Attest:
John J. Da Ponte, Jr.,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-457 Filed 1-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1



            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the previously filed
Registration Statements of Aethlon Medical, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No.
333-145290 and 333-127911 and 333-114017 and 333-49896) of our report, dated
July 14, 2008 on the consolidated financial statements of Aethlon Medical, Inc.
and Subsidiaries as of March 31, 2008 and for each of the two years in the
period ended March 31, 2008 and the period January 31, 2004 (inception) through
March 31, 2008 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Aethlon
Medical, Inc. for the year ended March 31, 2008.



                          /s/ Squar, Milner, Peterson, Miranda & Williamson, LLP
                          ------------------------------------------------------
                          Squar, Milner, Peterson, Miranda & Williamson, LLP


Newport Beach, California
July 14, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 7, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12636-12645]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5490]




[[Page 12635]]

_______________________________________________________________________

Part IV





Office of Management and Budget





_______________________________________________________________________



Budget Rescissions and Deferrals; Notice

Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 7, 1995 / Notices 
 
[[Page 12636]] 

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET


Budget Rescissions and Deferrals

To the Congress of the United States

    In accordance with the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control 
Act of 1974, I herewith report one revised deferral, totaling $7.3 
million, and two revised rescission proposals, totaling $106.7 million.
    The revised deferral affects the Department of Health and Human 
Services. The revised rescission proposals affect the Department of 
Education and the Environmental Protection Agency.
William J. Clinton

The White House,

    February 22, 1995.

BILLING CODE 3110-01-M
                                                                       
    [[Page 12637]]
    
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN07MR95.035


[[Page 12638]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN07MR95.036


[[Page 12639]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN07MR95.037


[[Page 12640]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN07MR95.038


[[Page 12641]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN07MR95.039


[[Page 12642]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN07MR95.040


[[Page 12643]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN07MR95.041


[[Page 12644]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN07MR95.042


[[Page 12645]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN07MR95.043


[FR Doc. 95-5490 Filed 3-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3110-01-C