2370 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 5 / Monday, January 9, 1995 / Proposed Rules

existing test method associated with

emission measurement requirements

that would apply irrespective of this

rulemaking.

II. Administrative Requirements

A. Public Hearing

A public hearing will be held if

requested, to discuss the proposed test

method in accordance with Section

307(d)(5) of the Clean Air Act. Persons

wishing to make oral presentations

should contact EPA at the address given

in the ADDRESSES section of this

preamble. Oral presentations will be

limited to 15 minutes each. Any

member of the public may file a written

statement with EPA before, during, or

within 30 days after the hearing. Written

statements should be addressed to the

Air Docket Section address given in the

ADDRESSES section of this preamble.

B. Docket

The docket is an organized and

complete file for all information

submitted or otherwise considered by

EPA in the development of this

proposed rulemaking. The principle

purposes of the docket are: (1) to allow

interested parties to identify and locate

documents so that they can effectively

participate in the rulemaking process

and (2) to serve as the record in case of

judicial review (except for interagency

review materials) [Section 307(d)(7)(A)].

C. Executive Order 12866

Under Executive Order 12866 [58

Federal Register 51735 (October 4,

1993)], the Agency must determine

whether the regulatory action is

‘‘significant’’ and therefore subject to

OMB review and the requirements of

the Executive Order. The Order defines

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ as one

that is likely to result in a rule that may:

(1) Have an annual effect on the

economy of $100 million or more, or

adversely affect in a material way the

economy, a sector of the economy,

productivity, competition, jobs, the

environment, public health or safety, or

State, local, or tribal governments or

communities;

(2) Create a serious inconsistency or

otherwise interfere with an action taken

or planned by another agency;

(3) Materially alter the budgetary

impact of entitlements, grants, user fees,

or loan programs or the rights and

obligations of recipients thereof; or

(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues

arising out of legal mandates, the

President’s priorities, or the principles

set forth in the Executive Order.

It has been determined that this action

is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’

within the meaning of Executive Order

12866 and is therefore not subject to

OMB review.

D. Regulatory Flexibility Act

The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

of 1980 requires the identification of

potentially adverse impacts of Federal

regulations upon small business

entities. The Act specifically requires

the completion of an RFA analysis in

those instances where small business

impacts are possible. Because this

rulemaking imposes no adverse

economic impacts, an analysis has not

been conducted. Pursuant to the

provision of 5 U.S.C. 605(b), I hereby

certify that the promulgated rule will

not have an impact on small entities

because no additional costs will be

incurred.

E. Paperwork Reduction Act

This rule does not change any

information collection requirements

subject to Office of Management and

Budget under the Paperwork Reduction

Act of 1980, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 60

Environmental protection, Air

pollution control, Intergovernmental

relations, Surface coating of metal

furniture, Automotive and light duty

truck surface coating operations,

Graphic arts industry publications,

Rotogravure printing, Pressure sensitive

tape and label surface coating, Industrial

surface coating: Large appliances, Metal

coil surface coating, Beverage can

surface coating industry, Flexible vinyl

and urethane coating and printing,

Plastic parts for business machine

coatings industry, Incorporation by

reference, and Reporting and

recordkeeping requirements.

Dated: December 23, 1994.

Carol M. Browner,

Administrator.

40 CFR Part 60 is proposed to be

amended as follows:

1. The authority citation for part 60

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, 7411, 7414,

7416, and 7601.

2. In § 60.17 of Subpart A, by adding

a paragraph (a)(63) to read as follows:

§ 60.17 Incorporation by reference.

* * * * *

(a) * * *

(63) ASTM D 5403–93 Standard Test

Methods for Volatile Content of

Radiation Curable Materials.

* * * * *

Appendix A—[Amended]

3. In Method 24 of Appendix A,

Section 3.1 is amended by removing the

words ‘‘For all other coatings analyzed

as follows:’’

4. In Method 24 of Appendix A,

Sections 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 3.7 are

redesignated as Sections 3.3, 3.4, 3.5,

3.6, 3.7, 3.8, respectively; Sections 2.6,

3.2 and 3.9 are added, to read as

follows:

Method 24—[Amended]

* * * * *

2. * * *

2.6 ASTM D 5403–93 Standard

Method for Volatile Content of

Radiation Curable Materials

(incorporated by reference—see § 60.17).

* * * * *

3.2 Ultraviolet Radiation-cured

Coating. To determine volatile content

of ultraviolet radiation-cured (UVcured) coatings, follow the procedures

in Section 3.9. Determine water content,

density and solids content of the UVcured coatings according to Sections

3.4, 3.5, and 3.6, respectively. The UVcured coatings are coatings which

contain unreacted monomers that are

polymerized by exposure to ultraviolet

light. For all other coatings not covered

by Sections 3.1 or 3.2 analyzed as

follows:

* * * * *

3.9 UV-cured Coating’s Volatile

Matter Content. Use the procedure in

ASTM D5403–93 (incorporated by

reference—see § 60.17) to determine the

volatile matter content of the coating

except the curing test described in

NOTE 2 of ASTM D5403–93 is required.

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 95–462 Filed 1–6–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

48 CFR Parts 45 and 52

Federal Acquisition Regulation;

Government Property

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

SUMMARY: On September 16, 1994, (59

FR 47583) the Director of Defense

Procurement, Department of Defense,

announced an initiative to rewrite the

Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)

Part 45, Government Property, to make

it easier to understand and to minimize

the burdens imposed on contractors and

contracting officers. The Director of

Defense Procurement is providing a

forum for an exchange of ideas and
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 5 / Monday, January 9, 1995 / Proposed Rules 2371

information with government and

industry personnel by holding public

meetings, soliciting public comments,

and publishing notices of the public

meetings in the Federal Register. The

topics to be discussed at the next public

meeting include a proposed deviation

from the current FAR Part 45

requirement to track certain government

property, proposed revisions to the

definitions currently located throughout

FAR Part 45, and the priority for

addressing the remaining topics. Prior to

the public meeting, interested parties

may obtain draft materials relating to

these topics from the Office of the

Assistant Secretary of Defense for Public

Affairs.

DATES: Public Meetings: A public

meeting will be conducted at the

address shown below from 1:00 p.m. to

5:00 p.m., local time, on January 24,

1995, and from 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.,

local time, on January 25, 1995.

Draft Materials: Drafts of the materials

to be discussed at the public meeting on

January 24 and 25 will be available at

the Office of the Assistant Secretary of

Defense for Public Affairs as of January

12, 1995.

Statements: Statements for

presentation should be submitted to the

address below on or before January 20,

1995.

ADDRESSES: Draft Materials: Interested

parties may obtain drafts of the

materials to be discussed at the public

meeting on January 24 and 25 from the

Office of the Assistant Secretary of

Defense for Public Affairs, Directorate

for Public Communication, Room

1E794, Attn: Harold Heilsnis, 1400

Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC

20301–1400.

Public Meeting: The public meeting

will be held in Suite 114, 1111 Jefferson

Davis Highway, Crystal Gateway North

(West Tower), Arlington, Virginia

22202. Individuals wishing to attend the

meeting, including individuals wishing

to make presentations on the topics

scheduled for discussion, should

contact Mrs. Linda W. Neilson, DAR

Council, Attn: IMD 3D139,

PDUSD(A&T)DP/DAR, 3062 Defense

Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301–3062.

Please cite File 94–H028 in all

correspondence related to this issue.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mrs. Linda W. Neilson, telephone (703)

602–0131.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Interested

parties were invited to provide written

suggestions or comments in the notice

of public hearing dated September 16,

1994 (59 FR 47583). Twenty-two

commentors provided approximately

500 comments focusing on the following

subject areas: definitions; general

comments; classification; general policy;

providing government property;

providing facilities; software/

intellectual property; motor vehicles;

depreciation; competitive advantage;

clauses; property control system;

liability; records/accountability;

physical inventory; reports, care,

maintenance and use of government

property; disposition of government

property; demilitarization; storage

agreements; and recommendations for

related legislative reform. At the January

24 and 25 public meeting, interested

parties are invited to present statements

on the proposed deviation, revisions to

the definitions, and/or the priority for

addressing the remaining topics.

Claudia L. Naugle,

Executive Editor, Defense Acquisition

Regulations Directorate.

[FR Doc. 95–437 Filed 1–6–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5000–04–M