alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 6 (Tuesday, January 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 2582]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-500]



[[Page 2582]]

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

[Docket No. RP95-104-000]


Mississippi River Transmission Corporation; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Tariff

January 4, 1995.
    Take notice that on December 30, 1994. Mississippi River 
Transmission Corporation (MRT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC 
Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, 
with an effective date of January 1, 1995:

Ninth Revised Sheet No. 5
Ninth Revised Sheet No. 6
Ninth Revised Sheet No. 7

    MRT states that the purpose of this filing is to adjust its rates 
to reflect additional Gas Supply Realignment Costs (GSRC) of $647,308, 
plus applicable interest, pursuant to Section 16.3 of the General Terms 
and Conditions of MRT's Tariff. MRT states that its filing includes the 
``Price Differential'' cost of continuing to perform under certain gas 
supply contracts during the months of July through September 1994 and 
GSRC Buyout/Buydown costs incurred during the period May, 1994 through 
November, 1994.
    MRT states that copies of its filing are available for inspection 
at its business offices, located in St. Louis, Missouri, and have been 
mailed to all of its affected customers and the State Commissions of 
Arkansas, Missouri and Illinois.
    Any person desiring to be heard or protest the subject filing 
should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 
20426, in accordance with Sections 385.211 and 385.214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before 
January 11, 1995. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and available for public inspection.
[FR Doc. 95-500 Filed 1-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 40 (Wednesday, March 1, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 11076]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4940]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 022395B]


Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council (Council) will 
hold a public meeting via conference call of its Reef Fish Stock 
Assessment Panel on Wednesday, March 1, 1995, beginning at 10:00 a.m. 
eastern standard time (EST)/9:00 a.m. central standard time (CST) to 
review recreational and commercial landings information on red grouper. 
These data were prepared by NMFS and Council staff, and relate to a 
draft Regulatory Amendment to the Reef Fish Fishery Management Plan 
which addresses a change in the size limit for red grouper, and the 
resulting impacts on the stock and the recreational allocation. A 
listening phone will be established at NMFS Southeast Regional Office 
for interested persons to listen to the discussion and participate in 
the meeting.

ADDRESSES: The listening phone will be located at NMFS Southeast 
Regional Office, 9721 Executive Center Drive North, St., Petersburg, FL 
33702; telephone: (813) 570-5301.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven M. Atran, Population Dynamics 
Statistician, at the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council, 5401 
West Kennedy Boulevard, Suite 331, Tampa, FL 33609; telephone: (813) 
228-2815.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional public testimony on this issue 
will be received at the Council meeting at the Holiday Inn Downtown - 
Superdome, 330 Loyola Avenue, New Orleans, LA, on Wednesday, March 15, 
1995, beginning at 8:45 a.m. Requests for sign language interpretation 
or other auxiliary aids should be directed to Julie Krebs at the above 
address.

    Dated: February 23, 1995.
David S. Crestin,
Acting Director, Office of Fisheries Conservation and Management, 
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 95-4940 Filed 2-28-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable) | Description of Proposed Provision:      In 2010 through 2012, raise the OASDI contribution and benefit base from $106,800 to $115,200 (in 2009 AWI indexed dollars). For years after 2012, the contribution and benefit base would be increased based on changes in SSA's average wage index. Additional earnings subject to the OASDI payroll tax would be credited for benefit calculation purposes. |
|-------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                           |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2009 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified August 31, 2009 |
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

.



# United States Court of Appeals

**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

WINVIEW IP HOLDINGS LLC,

Appellant

v.

FANDUEL, INC.,

Appellee

______________________

2024

- 1652

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2022

-

01307.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

Upon consideration of WinView IP Holdings LLC ’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal pursuant

to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b) and the parties’ agreement as to the allocation of costs,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT :

(1) The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed. Case: 24-1652 Document: 15 Page: 1 Filed: 08/19/2024WINVIEW IP HOLDINGS LLC v. FANDUEL

, INC

. 2

(2) Each party shall bear its own costs.

August 19

, 202 4

Date F OR THE C OURT

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: August 19, 2024 Case: 24-1652 Document: 15 Page: 2 Filed: 08/19/2024
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 7, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 12487]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5434]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 675

[Docket No. 950206040-5040-01; I.D. 022895D]


Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Area; Inshore 
Component Pollock Fishery in the Bering Sea Subarea

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Closure.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS is closing the directed fishery for pollock by vessels 
catching pollock for processing by the inshore component in the Bering 
Sea subarea (BS) of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands management area 
(BSAI). This action is necessary to prevent exceeding the first 
allowance of the pollock total allowable catch (TAC) for the inshore 
component in this area.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 12 noon, Alaska local time (A.l.t.), March 1, 1995, 
until 12 noon, A.l.t., August 15, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew N. Smoker, 907-586-7228.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The groundfish fishery in the BSAI exclusive 
economic zone is managed by NMFS according to the Fishery Management 
Plan for the Groundfish Fishery of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands 
Area (FMP) prepared by the North Pacific Fishery Management Council 
under authority of the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management 
Act. Fishing by U.S. vessels is governed by regulations implementing 
the FMP at 50 CFR parts 620 and 675.
    In accordance with Sec. 675.20(a)(7)(ii), the first seasonal 
allowance of pollock for the inshore component in the BS was 
established by the final groundfish specifications (60 FR 8479, 
February 14, 1995) as 167,344 metric tons (mt).
    The Director, Alaska Region, NMFS (Regional Director), has 
determined in accordance with Sec. 675.20(a)(8), that the first 
allowance of pollock TAC for the inshore component in the BS soon will 
be reached. Therefore, the Regional Director has established a directed 
fishing allowance of 162,344 mt with consideration that 5,000 mt will 
be taken as incidental catch in directed fishing for other species in 
the BS. Consequently, NMFS is prohibiting directed fishing for pollock 
by vessels catching pollock for processing by the inshore component in 
the BS.
    Directed fishing standards for applicable gear types may be found 
in the regulations at Sec. 675.20(h).

Classification

    This action is taken under Sec. 675.20 and is exempt from review 
under E.O. 12866.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: March 1, 1995.
David S. Crestin,
Acting Director, Office of Fisheries Conservation and Management, 
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 95-5434 Filed 3-1-95; 3:56 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 41 (Thursday, March 2, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 11688]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5165]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Human Resource Development (HRD); 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name and Committee Code: Special Emphasis Panel In Human 
Resource Development.
    Date and Time: March 20-21, 1995; 8:30 a.m.-4:30 p.m.
    Place: Room 340; National Science Foundation; 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Rodolfo Tamez; Program Director, RIMI; Human 
Resource Development (HRD); Room 815, National Science Foundation, 
4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 306-
1634.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate Research Improvement In Minority 
Institutions (RIMI) proposals as part of the selection process for 
awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: February 27, 1995.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-5165 Filed 3-1-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

 February 16, 2007

By the Court:

JOHN S. BOCTOR, ] Petition for Review of an

 Petitioner, ] Order of the Board of 

 ] Immigration Appeals.

No. 05-2530 v. ]

 ] 

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, ] No. A78-637-924

 Respondent. ] 

 ]

Upon consideration of the MOTION TO VACATE FOR LACK OF

JURISDICTION, filed on February 8, 2007, by counsel for the respondent,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. The judgment of this court, dated

January 24, 2007, is VACATED for lack of jurisdiction, and the opinion is WITHDRAWN. 

We direct both counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the government to show cause

within 14 days why they should not be sanctioned for their failure to inform us that the Board of

Immigration Appeals had granted a motion to reopen in this case eight months before we issued

our opinion.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 38 (Monday, February 27, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 10534-10535]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4593]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 10535]]

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

48 CFR Parts 1516 and 1552

[FRL-5161-1]


Acquisition Regulation

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Extension of comments on proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document extends the due date for comments by 30 days for 
the proposed revision to the EPA Acquisition Regulation (EPAAR) 
coverage on cost-plus-award fee (CPAF) contracts (60 FR 5888, January 
31, 1995).

DATES: Written comments on this proposed rule must be received on or 
before April 3, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Environmental Protection Agency, 
Office of Acquisition Management (3802F), 401 M Street SW, Washington, 
DC 20460, Attn: Louise Senzel (202) 260-6204.
    Dated: February 13, 1995.
Betty L. Bailey,
Director, Office of Acquisition Management.
[FR Doc. 95-4593 Filed 2-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 27 (Thursday, February 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7797]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3226]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Chemistry; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name and Committee Code: Special Emphasis Panel in Chemistry 
(#1191)
    Date and time: February 27-28, 1995, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Place: Rooms 365, 370, 390, NSF, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 
Arlington, VA 22230
    Type of Meeting: Closed
    Contact Person: Dr. Francis Wodarczyk, Program Director, Office 
of Special Projects, Chemistry Division, Room 1055, National Science 
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone: 
(703) 306-1856.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate proposals for Faculty Early 
Career Development (CAREER) Program in Chemistry.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; and personal information concerning 
individuals associated with the applications. These matters are 
exempt under 5 U.S.C.552 b(c) (4) and (6) of the Government in the 
Sunshine Act.

    Dated: February 6, 1995.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-3226 Filed 2-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6162
EDWARD LONNIE MCCARROLL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JAMES HUNT, Governor of North Carolina; FRANKLIN FREEMAN, Secretary of North CarolinaDepartment of Corrections; EDWARD DEVITO, Director, Durham Merchants and Citizens Against Crime, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-903-5-F) Submitted: May 14, 1996 Decided: May 24, 1996 Before ERVIN, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edward Lonnie McCarroll, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's orders dismissing as frivolous his claims for relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1983). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McCarroll v. Hunt , No. CA-95-903-5-F (E.D.N.C. Dec. 14, 1995 & Jan. 25, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### WESLEY BLACKWELL and I. SHAIN, Trading and Doing Business as SHAIN’S AUTO FINANCE COMPANY, v. NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, and COLONIAL FIRE UNDERWRITERS BRANCH OF NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD.

(Filed 28 November, 1951.)

Insurance § 43b—

A policy covering collision and upset may not be avoided by insurer on tbe ground that at tbe time of the loss the driver of tbe car insured was endeavoring to escape arrest while transporting intoxicating liquor in violation of law, the policy containing no exception on this ground and there being nothing to show that the insurance promoted the commission of the unlawful act.

Appeal by defendants from *Bone, J.,*August Term, 1951, of New HaNover.

Affirmed.

This was an action to recover on an automobile insurance policy for loss due to collision and upset. Upon agreed statement of facts judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiffs and the defendants appealed.

*John D. Bellamy •& Sons and Lloyd S. Elkins, Jr., for plaintiffs, ap-pellees.*

*Poisson, Campbell & Marshall for defendants, appellants.*

*560Per Curiam.

Issuance of the policy and loss as claimed were admitted, but defendants denied liability on the ground that the loss occurred while the insured was transporting in the automobile intoxicating liquor in violation of law and endeavoring to escape arrest. However, the policy contains no exception on this ground, and as the loss comes within the terms of the insurance policy, as issued and paid for, this defense will not avail the defendants. *Poole v. Ins. Co.,*188 N.C. 468, 125 S.E. 8. The insurance contract had no direct connection with the violation of law admitted, but was only collateral thereto. *Electrova Co. v. Ins. Co.,*156 N.C. 232, 72 S.E. 306; 29 A.J. 208. The insurance here cannot be said to have promoted the unlawful act referred to. 132 A.L.R. 126.

There was no evidence of loss by intentional act of the insured. Nor does the statement of facts show misrepresentation in the plaintiffs’ declarations on which the policy was issued.

Judgment affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 7, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 12572]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5535]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-30,731]


The Hanover Shoe Company, Franklin and Marlinton, West Virginia; 
Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on February 13, 1995 in response to a worker petition 
which was filed on February 13, 1995 on behalf of workers at The 
Hanover Shoe Company, Franklin & Marlinton, West Virginia.
    The petitioning group of workers is subject to an ongoing 
investigation for which a determination has not yet been issued (TA-W-
730,715-6). Consequently, further investigation in this case would 
serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC this 17th day of February, 1995.
Victor J. Trunzo,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-5535 Filed 3-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-10502

A.W. Chesterton Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

75 

KA 11-02495 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MICHAEL KEARNS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

 

FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (KRISTEN MCDERMOTT OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (JAMES P. MAXWELL

OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (Jeffrey R.

Merrill, A.J.), rendered July 26, 2011. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of aggravated criminal contempt. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him, upon his

plea of guilty, of aggravated criminal contempt (Penal Law § 215.52

[1]), defendant contends that his waiver of the right to appeal is

unenforceable and that his sentence is unduly harsh and severe. Even

assuming, arguendo, that defendant’s waiver of the right to appeal was

knowing, intelligent and voluntary, we agree with defendant that the

waiver does not encompass his challenge to the severity of the

sentence because “ ‘no mention was made on the record during the

course of the allocution concerning the waiver of defendant’s right to

appeal his conviction’ that he was also waiving his right to appeal

any issue concerning the severity of the sentence” (People v Lorenz,

119 AD3d 1450, 1450, lv denied 24 NY3d 962; see People v Pimentel, 108

AD3d 861, 862, lv denied 21 NY3d 1076). Nevertheless, we perceive no

basis to exercise our discretion to modify his sentence in the

interest of justice (see CPL 470.15 [6] [b]). 

Entered: February 13, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court