alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### JOHN GODWIN, JR. v. WALTER E. VINSON.

(Filed 25 November. 1959.)

1. Partnership § 8—

One partner may not sue in Ms own name upon a cause of action in favor of the partnership, and where the evidence discloses that the action by a single individual was on a partnership claim nonsuit is properly entered.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Phillips, J.,*March, 1959 Term, RowaN Superior Court.

*327Civil action to recover $1,065.80 which the plaintiff alleged was the total amount of loans he made to the defendant from April 19, 1957, until Miarch 27, 1958. The defendant denied the material allegations of the complaint and set up as a further defense that he was employed by, did work for, and all h-is transactions were with Godwin Brothers; that Godwin Brothers failed and refused to malee advances in accordance with the terms of their contract, which failure forced him to seek other employment.

The plaintiff testified he did not claim the amount sued on was due him individually. “Well, it is owed to the Godwin Brothers, which is a name we go under. ... It is a family business and my brother and my father and I all have an equal share in it.”

At the close of the evidence the defendant moved to dismiss upon the 'ground the action was not brought in the name of the real party in interest. The plaintiff then moved that ¡the partnership, namely God-win Brothers, be made a party plaintiff, and the court in its discretion denied the motion.

The court entered an order dismissing the action. The plaintiff excepted to the refusal of the court to allow the amendment, and appealed.

*Graham M. Carlton for plaintiff, appellant.*

*George L. Burke, Jr., for defendant, appellee.*

PeR Cueiam.

The appeal brings up for review the order refusing the amendment and the order dismissing tíre action. It is settled law in this State that one partner may not sue in his own name, and for his benefit, upon a cause of action in favor of a partnership. The plaintiff’s own evidence shows 'the partnership is the real party in interest. The plaintiff cannot maintain this action, hence nonsuit was proper. *Chapman v. McLawhorn,*150 N.C. 166, 63 S.E. 721.

Affirmed.
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATIONS





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted), Anna E. Gluskin, Chief Executive
Officer and President of Generex Biotechnology Corporation (the "Company"), and
Rose C. Perri, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies
that, to the best of her knowledge:





1.           The
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2009 to
which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and





2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of
the period covered by the Report.





DATE: June 9, 2009
                  By:
      /s/ Anna E. GluskinAnna
      E. Gluskin, Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)DATE:
      June 9, 2009
                  By:
      /s/ Rose C. PerriRose
      C. Perri, Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting
Officer)
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 42 (Friday, March 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 11957]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5288]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED

Procurement List Additions

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Additions to the procurement list.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action adds to the Procurement List services to be 
furnished by nonprofit agencies employing persons who are blind or have 
other severe disabilities.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 3, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, Crystal Square 3, Suite 403, 1735 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Arlington, Virginia 22202-3461.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Milkman (703) 603-7740.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 6, 1995, the Committee for 
Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled published 
notice (60 FR 2083) of proposed additions to the Procurement List.
    After consideration of the material presented to it concerning 
capability of qualified nonprofit agencies to provide the services, 
fair market price, and impact of the additions on the current or most 
recent contractors, the Committee has determined that the services 
listed below are suitable for procurement by the Federal Government 
under 41 U.S.C. 46-48c and 41 CFR 51-2.4.
    I certify that the following action will not have a significant 
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The major factors 
considered for this certification were:
    1. The action will not result in any additional reporting, 
recordkeeping or other compliance requirements for small entities other 
than the small organizations that will furnish the services to the 
Government.
    2. The action does not appear to have a severe economic impact on 
current contractors for the services.
    3. The action will result in authorizing small entities to furnish 
the services to the Government.
    4. There are no known regulatory alternatives which would 
accomplish the objectives of the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46-
48c) in connection with the services proposed for addition to the 
Procurement List.
    Accordingly, the following services are hereby added to the 
Procurement List:

Laundry Service
Naval Undersea Warfare Center
Keyport, Washington
Mailing Service
Headquarters, Air Force Military Personnel Center
Randolph Air Force Base, Texas

    This action does not affect current contracts awarded prior to the 
effective date of this addition or options exercised under those 
contracts.
Beverly L. Milkman,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 95-5288 Filed 3-2-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-33-P
```
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4114 

To amend Public Law 99–420 to provide for the conveyance of certain 

Federal land in the State of Maine for use for affordable workforce 

housing, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 28, 2022 

Mr. KING (for himself and Ms. COLLINS) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To amend Public Law 99–420 to provide for the conveyance 

of certain Federal land in the State of Maine for use 

for affordable workforce housing, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF CERTAIN FEDERAL LAND IN 

4 MAINE FOR AFFORDABLE WORKFORCE 

5 HOUSING. 

6 Section 102(f) of Public Law 99–420 (16 U.S.C. 341 

7 note) is amended by striking ‘‘which so desires’’ in the 

8 first sentence and all that follows through the period at 

9 the end of paragraph (2) and inserting the following: ‘‘that 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4114 IS

1 requests the conveyance of the land for affordable work2 force housing, subject to the limitation that the Secretary 

3 may retain not more than 15 acres of the Federal land 

4 identified as ‘4DBH’ on the map, to be used by the Sec5 retary to provide housing and administrative facilities for 

6 the use of, and supporting the purposes of, the Park.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1583

EQI, Ltd: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 40 (Wednesday, March 1, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 11080]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4943]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP92-237-015]


Alabama-Tennessee Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Change 
in FERC Gas Tariff

February 23, 1995.
    Take notice that on February 21, 1995, Alabama-Tennessee Natural 
Gas Company (Alabama-Tennessee), tendered for filing Eighth Revised 
Sheet No. 4, as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 
1, pursuant to the settlement approved by the Commission in its letter 
order issued on December 30, 1993 in this proceeding. Alabama-Tennessee 
proposes that the tariff sheet be made effective March 1, 1995.
    Alabama-Tennessee has requested such waiver of the Commission's 
Regulations as may be necessary to accept and approve its filing as 
proposed.
    Alabama-Tennessee states that copies of its filing were served upon 
the Company's jurisdictional customers and interested public bodies as 
well as all the parties shown on the Commission's official service list 
established in this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol 
Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 
385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests 
should be filed on or before March 2, 1995. Protests will be considered 
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken but 
will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-4943 Filed 2-28-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 32



Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.



|                  |  |  |  |                                                                |  |                    
|----------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------
|                  |  |  |  | Bank of America, N.A., Trustee for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
|                  |  |  | 
|February 22, 2010 |  |  |  | By                                                             |  | /S/ NANCY G. WILLIS
|                  |  |  |  |                                                                |  | Nancy G. Willis    
|                  |  |  |  |                                                                |  | Vice President
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 48 (Monday, March 13, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 13397]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5971]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

48 CFR Parts 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 22, 23, 
36, 42, 44, 46, 47, 49, 52, and 53

[FAR Case 94-790]


Federal Acquisition Regulation; Acquisition of Commercial Items

AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DOD), General Services Administration 
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Change of date for meeting on proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: At 60 FR 11198; March 1, 1995, a proposed rule was issued 
pursuant to the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act of 1994 (the Act) 
to implement the revised statutory authorities for the acquisition of 
commercial items and components by Federal Government agencies as well 
as contractors and subcontractors at all levels. Instead of meeting on 
the date given in that document, the FAR Council is rescheduling its 
public meeting at the GSA Auditorium in Washington, DC, for April 3, 
1995.
    The purpose of the meeting is to enable the public to present its 
views on the proposed rule, FAR case 94-790--Acquisition of Commercial 
Items, and to exchange ideas and opinions with respect to the 
implementation of the Act. Interested members of the public may obtain 
copies of the proposed rule from the FAR Secretariat, Room 4037, GSA 
Building, 18th and F Sts., NW, Washington, DC 20405, (202) 501-4755. 
The public is encouraged to attend this meeting and must provide, to 
the FAR Secretariat, a written statement on the views they would like 
to present not later than March 29, 1995. Organizations or groups with 
similar views should select a representative speaker.

DATES: The meeting will be held on April 3, 1995, at 1:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the GSA Auditorium, 8th & F 
Streets NW., First Floor, Washington, DC 20405.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Edward Loeb, Project Deputy for 
the Implementation of the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act of 1994 
at (202) 501-4547 or the FAR Secretariat, General Services 
Administration, (202) 501-0692.

    Dated: March 7, 1995.
Edward Loeb,
Deputy Project Manager for the Implementation of the Federal 
Acquisition Streamlining Act of 1994.
[FR Doc. 95-5971 Filed 3-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-34-D
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 29 (Monday, February 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 8233]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3448]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES

[Public Notice 22]


Agency Forms Submitted for OMB Review

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the United States.

ACTION: In accordance with the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1980, Eximbank has submitted a proposed collection of 
information in the form of a survey to the Office of Management and 
Budget for review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

PURPOSE: The proposed Survey of Eximbank Competitiveness (1995) to 
Exporters and Banks as authorized by 12 U.S.C. 635(b), Export-Import 
Bank of the United States Act of 1945, as amended, is to be completed 
by U.S. banks and exporters familiar with Eximbank's programs as a 
means of evaluating the private sector's view on the extent to which 
Eximbank has provided export credit programs competitive with the 
export credit programs offered by the major foreign OECD governments.
    The collection of the information will enable Eximbank to assess 
and report to the U.S. Congress the private sector's view of its 
programs' competitiveness, as required by law.

SUMMARY: The following summarizes the information collection proposal 
submitted to OMB.

(1) Type of request: revised
(2) Number of forms submitted: one
(3) Form Number: EIB 85-3 (Rev. 12/92)
(4) Title of information collection: Survey of Eximbank Competitiveness 
(1994) to Exporters and Banks
(5) Frequency of use: annual
(6) Respondents: Commercial banks and exporters in the United States
(7) Estimated total number of annual responses: 25
(8) Estimated total number of hours needed to fill out the form: 25

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR COMMENTS: Copies of the proposed application 
may be obtained from Tamzen C. Reitan, Agency Clearance Officer, (202) 
565-3333. Comments and questions should be directed to Mr. Jeff Hill, 
Office of Management and Budget, Information and Regulatory Affairs, 
Room 10102, Washington, DC 20503, (202) 395-3176. All comments should 
be submitted within two weeks of this notice; if you intend to submit 
comments but are unable to meet this deadline, please advise by 
telephone that comments will be submitted late.

    Dated: February 6, 1995.
Tamzen C. Reitan,
Agency Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-3448 Filed 2-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of E Com Ventures, Inc. (the "Company") of
Form 10-K for the year ended January 28, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael W. Katz,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                               By: /s/ MICHAEL W. KATZ
                                                   ------------------------
                                                   Michael W. Katz
                                                   President and
                                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                                   April 28, 2006
#### STATE v. ROLLY J. BRIDGES

(Filed 27 November, 1957)

Automobiles § 72—

Evidence in this prosecution for operating a motor vehicle on a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor *held*sufficient to overrule defendant’s motion to nonsuit.

Appeal by defendant from *Olive, J.,*April 29, 1957 Criminal Term of Guilford (Greensboro Division).

Defendant was tried in the Municipal-County Court of Guil-ford on a warrant charging the operation of a motor vehicle on the public highways while under the influence of intoxicating liquors. He was convicted, sentenced, and appealed to the Superior Court. He was tried in the Superior Court on the original warrant. The jury returned a verdict of guilty. From the judgment he appealed.

*Attorney General Patton and Assistant Attorney General Mc-Galliard for the State.*

*Z. H. Howerton, Jr. for defendant appellant.*

Per Curiam.

Defendant took no exception to the evidence or charge. He relies solely on his motion to nonsuit.

A Ford truck traveling on Springwood Church Road ran off the road and into an embankment. There was evidence from one who heard and saw the wreck that defendant was driving the truck and was at the time, in the opinion of the witness, intoxicated. This evidence was supplemented and supported by statements made by defendant to a police officer who went to defendant’s home to investigate, about an hour and a half after the wreck. The officer found the defendant in a drunken condition. The officer testified: “Mr. Bridges told us that he was driving the truck and that he didn’t know as he was too drunk to operate, that he’d appreciate it if we would not charge him with it. He said he had been drinking three or four days and nights; you could smell alcohol on him after we got him awake and talked to him. He was unsteady on his feet — staggery; we had to aid him by holding to his arm to keep him from falling from the porch. I held his arm as he went into the station. He looked like he had not had any sleep in several days and he appeared to me to be red-eyed; his face was red and his speech was poor. In my opinion he was drunk.”

There is no suggestion that this statement was not freely and voluntarily made. The subsequent statement by the defendant to a police officer that he had not consumed any alcoholic bever*268ages prior to the wreck, and that he only got drunk following the wreck merely presented a question of veracity to be passed on by the jury. Defendant’s contentions were fully set forth in the charge. The jury, on plenary evidence coming in part from the defendant, has found him guilty. There is

No error.