Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 17, 2016 / Notices 8043 

1See Continuation of Antidumping Duty Order on 

Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate from the 

People’s Republic of China and Continuation of 

Suspended Antidumping Duty Investigations on 

Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate from the 

Russian Federation and Ukraine, 80 FR 79306 

(December 21, 2015) (‘‘Continuation Notice’’). 

2 Id. at 79307. 

1See Certain Pasta From Italy: Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2013–2014, 80 FR 47467 (August 7, 2015) 

(Preliminary Results), and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

2The Rummo Group consists of Rummo S.p.A., 

Lenta Lavorazione, Pasta Castiglioni, and Rummo 

S.p.A. Molino e Pastificio. In this review, we found 

that the facts have not changed with respect to 

Rummo and its affiliates and therefore, we followed 

the same methodology as we did in the most recent 

completed review (AR 17) by collapsing the 

affiliated companies as the Rummo Group. See 

Certain Pasta From Italy: Notice of Final Results of 

17th Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 

2012–2013, 80 FR 8604 (February 18, 2015) (AR 17 

Final Results). 

3Rummo filed a request for a hearing on 

September 9, 2015, which the Department rejected 

on September 9, 2015, as being untimely filed. 

4On October 6, 2015, La Molisana submitted a 

correction to an item stated in its October 5, 2015 

case brief. 

5The Department also postponed the briefing 

schedule in several Memoranda to All Interested 

Parties, dated August 12, 2015, September 8, 2015, 

September 11, 2015, and September 28, 2015. 

6See Memorandum to the Record from Ron 

Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement & Compliance, regarding ‘‘Tolling of 

Administrative Deadlines As a Result of the 

Government Closure During Snowstorm Jonas,’’ 

dated January 27, 2016. 

7For a full description of the scope of the order, 

see the ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Partial Rescission: Certain Pasta from 

Italy; 2013–2014’’ from Christian Marsh, Deputy 

Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance, dated concurrently with this notice 

(Issues and Decision Memorandum) and 

incorporated herein by reference. 

8See Issues and Decision Memorandum; see also 

Memorandum to the File, Through Eric B. 

Greynolds, Program Manager, Office III, from Joy 

Zhang, Case Analyst, Office III, titled ‘‘Certain Pasta 

from Italy: Calculation Memorandum—La 

Molisana,’’ dated February 9, 2016, and 

Memorandum to the File, Through Eric B. 

Greynolds, Program Manager, Office III, from 

George McMahon, Case Analyst, Office III, titled 

Continued 

Investigations.1 The published Federal 

Register notice contained a clerical error 

stating that ‘‘{p}ursuant to sections 

751(c)(2) and 751(c)(6) of the Act, the 

Department intends to initiate the next 

five-year sunset reviews of the 

antidumping duty order on CTL plate 

from the PRC and the Agreements on 

CTL plate from Russia and Ukraine not 

later than November 2019.’’ 2 The Notice 

should have read that the Department 

intends to initiate the above-referenced 

next five-year sunset reviews not later 

than November 2020. 

This notice serves to correct the 

incorrect initiation date of the next fiveyear sunset reviews in the Continuation 

Notice. This correction is published in 

accordance with section 777(i) of the 

Act. 

Dated: February 10, 2016. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2016–03255 Filed 2–16–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–475–818] 

Certain Pasta From Italy: Final Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2013–2014 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On August 7, 2015, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published the preliminary 

results of the antidumping duty 

administrative review of certain pasta 

(pasta) from Italy and gave interested 

parties an opportunity to comment on 

the Preliminary Results.1

The period of review (POR) is July 1, 

2013, through June 30, 2014. As a result 

of our analysis of the comments and 

information received, these final results 

differ from the Preliminary Results with 

respect to Rummo S.p.A. Molino e 

Pastificio (the Rummo Group).2 For the 

final weighted-average dumping 

margins, see the ‘‘Final Results of 

Review’’ section below. 

DATES: Effective: February 17, 2016. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joy 

Zhang (La Molisana) or George 

McMahon (the Rummo Group), AD/CVD 

Operations, Office III, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–1168 or (202) 482– 

1167, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 7, 2015, the Department of 

Commerce (the Department) published 

the Preliminary Results. In accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii), we 

invited parties to comment on our 

Preliminary Results. On August 10, 

2015, La Molisana submitted a request 

for a hearing, which was withdrawn on 

October 27, 2015.3 On October 5, 2015, 

Petitioners, La Molisana S.p.A. (La 

Molisana) 4 and the Rummo Group 

submitted their case briefs. October 9, 

2015, the Department revised the 

briefing schedule.5 On October 15, 2015, 

Petitioners, La Molisana and the 

Rummo Group submitted their rebuttal 

briefs. As explained in the 

memorandum from the Acting Assistant 

Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance, the Department has 

exercised its discretion to toll all 

administrative deadlines due to the 

recent closure of the Federal 

Government. All deadlines in this 

segment of the proceeding have been 

extended by four business days. The 

revised deadline for the final results of 

this review is now February 9, 2016.6

Scope of the Order 

Imports covered by the order are 

shipments of certain non-egg dry pasta. 

The merchandise subject to review is 

currently classifiable under items 

1901.90.90.95 and 1902.19.20 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS). Although the 

HTSUS subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the merchandise 

subject to the order is dispositive.7

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs by parties to this 

administrative review are addressed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

A list of the issues that parties raised 

and to which we responded is attached 

to this notice as Appendix. The Issues 

and Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on-file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov and in the Central 

Records Unit (CRU), room B8024 of the 

main Department of Commerce 

building. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

on the Internet at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. 

The signed Issues and Decision 

Memorandum and the electronic 

versions of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on a review of the record and 

comments received from interested 

parties regarding our Preliminary 

Results, we have recalculated La 

Molisana’s and the Rummo Group’s 

weighted-average dumping margins. 

However, La Molisana’s adjustments did 

not affect the calculated final margin.8


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
8044 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 17, 2016 / Notices 

‘‘Certain Pasta from Italy: Calculation 

Memorandum—the Rummo Group,’’ dated 

February 9, 2016. 

9The margin for the non-examined companies 

was based on the calculated weighted-average 

margin of La Molisana (the sole mandatory 

respondent receiving an above de minimis margin 

in these final results). 

10 In these final results, the Department applied 

the assessment rate calculation method adopted in 

Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the 

Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 

(February 14, 2012). 

As a result of the aforementioned 

recalculation of the Rummo Group’s 

rate, the weighted-average dumping 

margin for the two non-selected 

companies has changed. 

Final Results of the Review 

As a result of this review, the 

Department determines the following 

weighted-average dumping margins 9 for 

the period July 1, 2013, through June 30, 

2014: 

Producer and/or exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

La Molisana S.p.A. ..................... 12.90 

Rummo S.p.A., Lenta 

Lavorazione, Pasta Castiglioni, 

and Rummo S.p.A. Molino e 

Pastificio (collectively, the 

Rummo Group) ....................... 0.00 

Pastificio Andalini S.p.A. ............ 12.90 

Delverde Industrie Alimentari 

S.p.A. ...................................... 12.90 

Duty Assessment 

The Department shall determine and 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries.10 For any 

individually examined respondents 

whose weighted-average dumping 

margin is above de minimis, we 

calculated importer-specific ad valorem 

duty assessment rates based on the ratio 

of the total amount of dumping 

calculated for the importer’s examined 

sales to the total entered value of those 

same sales in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1). Upon issuance of the final 

results of this administrative review, if 

any importer-specific assessment rates 

calculated in the final results are above 

de minimis (i.e., at or above 0.5 percent), 

the Department will issue instructions 

directly to CBP to assess antidumping 

duties on appropriate entries. 

We intend to issue assessment 

instructions directly to CBP 15 days 

after publication of the final results of 

this review. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the notice of final results 

of administrative review for all 

shipments of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review, as provided by 

section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash 

deposit rate for respondents noted above 

will be the rate established in the final 

results of this administrative review; (2) 

for merchandise exported by 

manufacturers or exporters not covered 

in this administrative review but 

covered in a prior segment of the 

proceeding, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company specific rate 

published for the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding; 

(3) if the exporter is not a firm covered 

in this review, a prior review, or the 

original investigation, but the 

manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate 

will be the rate established for the most 

recently completed segment of this 

proceeding for the manufacturer of the 

subject merchandise; and (4) the cash 

deposit rate for all other manufacturers 

or exporters will continue to be 15.45 

percent, the all-others rate established 

in the antidumping investigation as 

modified by the section 129 

determination. These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers Regarding the 

Reimbursement of Duties 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) 

to file a certificate regarding the 

reimbursement of antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during the POR. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Department’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of doubled 

antidumping duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective orders (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return/destruction of 

APO materials, or conversion to judicial 

protective order, is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.213(h). 

Dated: February 9, 2016. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Final Issues 

and Decision Memorandum 

Summary 

I. Background 

Scope of the Order 

II. List of Comments 

III. Analysis of Comments 

La Molisana 

Comment 1: Pasta Shape 

Comment 2: General and Administrative 

(G&A) Ratio 

Comment 3: Indirect Selling Expenses 

Comment 4: Direct Materials Calculation 

Comment 5: Direct Selling Expenses 

Comment 6: Applying Differential Pricing 

Analysis 

The Rummo Group 

Comment 7: Treatment of Pasta Castiglioni’s 

Home Market Control Numbers 

Comment 8: Treatment of Matching U.S. 

Sales with Home Market Sales 

Comment 9: Treatment of the Manufacturers, 

Rummo and Pasta Castiglioni 

Comment 10: Treatment of the Rummo 

Group’s Freight Revenue 

Comment 11: Application of a Cap for 

Certain U.S. Market Freight Revenue 

(FRTREVU) 

Comment 12: Application of a Countervailing 

Duty Offset (CVDU) to Rummo 

Comment 13: Treatment of Negative Margins 

Associated with the Differential Pricing 

(DP) Methodology 

IV. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2016–03252 Filed 2–16–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–601] 

Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts 

Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, 

From the People’s Republic of China: 

Final Rescission of Antidumping Duty 

New Shipper Review; 2014–2015 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce 

DATES: Effective February 17, 2016. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Elizabeth Eastwood, AD/CVD 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES