alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3994 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to require the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to repay the estates of deceased beneficiaries for certain benefits 

paid by the Secretary and misused by fiduciaries of such beneficiaries, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 5, 2022 

Mr. MANCHIN (for himself and Mr. TUBERVILLE) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to repay the estates of deceased beneficiaries for certain benefits paid by the Secretary and misused by fiduciaries of such beneficiaries, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Restoring Benefits to 

5 Defrauded Veterans Act of 2022’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3994 IS

1 SEC. 2. REPAYMENT BY THE SECRETARY OF VETERANS AF2 FAIRS OF ESTATES OF DECEASED BENE3 FICIARIES FOR CERTAIN BENEFITS PAID BY 

4 THE SECRETARY AND MISUSED BY FIDU5 CIARIES. 

6 Section 6107 of title 38, United States Code, is 

7 amended— 

8 (1) by redesignating subsections (c) and (d) as 

9 subsections (d) and (e), respectively; 

10 (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the fol11 lowing new subsection (c): 

12 ‘‘(c) REISSUANCE OF AMOUNTS IN THE CASE OF A

13 DECEASED BENEFICIARY.—(1) If a beneficiary described 

14 in subsection (a) predeceases a payment under subsection 

15 (a) or (b), the Secretary shall pay such benefits, subject 

16 to paragraph (2), to an individual or entity in the fol17 lowing order: 

18 ‘‘(A) The estate of the beneficiary. 

19 ‘‘(B) A successor fiduciary serving the bene20 ficiary when the beneficiary died. 

21 ‘‘(C) The next inheritor determined by a court 

22 of competent jurisdiction. 

23 ‘‘(2) The Secretary may not make a payment under 

24 this subsection to a fiduciary who misused benefits of the 

25 beneficiary.’’; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3994 IS

1 (3) in subsection (e), as redesignated, by strik2 ing ‘‘subsection (a) or (b)’’ and inserting ‘‘this sec3 tion’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-10525

A.W. Chesterton Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1900

JAE Electronics, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
#### Marjorie Rickard, Appellant, v Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, Defendant, and American Airlines, Inc., Respondent.

[773 NYS2d 393]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Debra James, J.), entered December 13, 2002, upon a jury verdict, in favor of defendant American Airlines, Inc., unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered August 1, 2002, which denied plaintiffs motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 to set aside the verdict, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the ensuing judgment.

Although defendant improperly determined that the notes of its claims analyst did not constitute an accident report, defendant’s failure to exchange the notes was not attributable to bad faith *(cf. Sage v Proskauer Rose,*275 AD2d 11, 17-18 [2000]), and did not require preclusion of the claims analyst’s highly relevant testimony, particularly since plaintiff failed to advise defendant that the accident was first reported to this witness, a circumstance of which defendant was unaware until the eve of trial. Moreover, plaintiffs claim of error respecting this witness’s testimony was unpreserved by timely objection and any objection to the introduction of the witness’s notes was waived by the determination of plaintiffs counsel to use them in cross-examination.

*233The court properly determined that submission of the case to the jury on the theory of res ipsa loquitur would not be appropriate since plaintiff failed to demonstrate that her fall would not have occurred in the absence of negligence and that it was not due to any voluntary action or contribution on her part *(cf. Bonura v KWK Assoc.,*2 AD3d 307 [2003]).

The court properly exercised its discretion in denying plaintiffs request for a missing witness charge regarding one of defendant’s employees, who could not be identified. Defendant produced another employee who had witnessed plaintiffs fall, and plaintiff failed to demonstrate that defendant was on notice that she intended to commence litigation, sufficient to require preservation of its duty roster *(see Amaris v Sharp Elecs. Corp.,*304 AD2d 457 [2003], *lv denied*1 NY3d 507 [2004]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe and Sullivan, JJ.
<PAGE>   1




                                                                      EXHIBIT 24



                               POWERS OF ATTORNEY




<PAGE>   2








                           VARSITY SPIRIT CORPORATION

                            Form 10-K Annual Report

                            ------------------------

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY
                            ------------------------



KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned whose signature
appears below constitutes and appoints John M. Nichols, Gregory C. Webb
and Jeffrey G. Webb, and each of them, his true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and
resubstitution for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign the Company's Form 10-K Annual Report and to file
the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection
therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto
said attorneys-in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and
perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done
in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he
might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that
said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or their substitute or substitutes,
may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this power or attorney
this        day of                1997.
    ------         ---------------


                                   ___________________________
                                   (signature)


                                   ___________________________
                                   (printed name)
Exhibit 10.7

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE PETROHAWK ENERGY CORPORATION

SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED 2004 EMPLOYEE
INCENTIVE PLAN

The first two sentences in Section V of the Petrohawk Energy Corporation Second Amended and Restated 2004 Employee
Incentive Plan (the Plan) are hereby deleted in their entirety and replaced with the following:

The
aggregate number of shares of Restricted Stock, shares of Incentive Stock and Shares which may be issued under Stock Options granted under the Plan shall not exceed 7,050,000. In addition, the aggregate number of shares of Restricted Stock and
Incentive Stock combined which may be issued under the Plan shall not exceed 3,525,000.

This Amendment No. 1 to the Plan is
effective this 12th day of July, 2006.



Petrohawk Energy CorporationBy:

/s/  Floyd C. WilsonName:

Floyd C. WilsonTitle:

President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 40 (Wednesday, March 1, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 11118]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5010]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-30, 113]


Philips Lighting Company Richmond, KY; Investigations Regarding 
Certifications of Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment 
Assistance; Correction

    This notice corrects the notice for petition TA-W-30-113 which was 
published in the Federal Register on August 8, 1994 (59 FR 40372) in FR 
Document 94-19240.
    This revises the date received and the date of petition on the 
ninth line of the third and fourth columns in the appendix table on 
page 40372. The date received and the date of petition should both read 
``April 1, 1994'' in the third and fourth columns on the ninth line of 
the appendix table.

    Signed in Washington, D.C., this 22nd day of February, 1995.
Victor J. Trunzo,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-5010 Filed 2-28-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable) | Description of Proposed Provision:      Apply 2 percent payroll tax rate on earnings over $200,000 in 2017, with the $200,000 threshold wage-indexed after 2017.  Give proportional benefit credit for additional earnings in AIME for benefit computation. |
|-------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                           |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2009 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified May 14, 2010 |
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk September 5, 2012 

# Order

September 5, 2012

145748

PROTECT OUR JOBS,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145748

COA: 311828

BOARD OF STATE CANVASSERS,

Defendant

- Appellee,

and

CITIZENS PROTECTING MICHIGAN’S

CONSTITUTION,

Intervening Defendant

- Appellant.

_______________________________________

This cause having been brought to this Court by application for lea ve to appeal

from the decision of the Court of Appeals and having been argued by counsel and due

deliberation having been had thereon, it is ordered that the judgment of the Court of

Appeals is affirmed. Pursuant to MCR 7.317(C)(3), the Clerk is directed to issue this

judgment order forthwith. No motion for rehearing will be entertained.
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Retirement Age | Description of Proposed Provision:      Shorten the hiatus in the normal retirement age (start increasing to age 67 for those age 62 in 2010, rather than those age 62 in 2017) and then index the normal retirement age (by 1 month every 2 years) until the NRA reaches age 68. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2009 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified November 16, 2009 |
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 40 (Wednesday, March 1, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 11290]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4993]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Indian Gaming

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of amendment to approved Tribal-State compact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 2710, of the Indian Gaming Regulatory 
Act of 1988 (Pub. L. 100-497), the Secretary of the Interior shall 
publish, in the Federal Register, notice of approved Amendments to 
Tribal-State Compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III (casino) 
gambling on Indian reservations. The Assistant Secretary--Indian 
Affairs, Department of the Interior, through her delegated authority, 
has approved the Amendment to the Tribal-State Compact For Regulation 
of Class III Gaming Between the Coushatta Tribe and the State of 
Louisiana which was executed on January 12, 1995.

DATES: This action is effective March 1, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George T. Skibine, Director, Indian 
Gaming Management Staff, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, D.C. 
20240, (202) 219-4068.

    Dated: February 21, 1995.
Ada E. Deer,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 95-4993 Filed 2-28-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
HeathCo LLC

Security Light with Motion Sensor example

Section 301 Submission

HeathCo LLC

Replacement Motion Sensor example
EXHIBIT 11

GOLDEN STATE VINTNERS, INC.        STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS        (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

Basic and fully diluted earnings per share ("EPS") are determined as follows:

|                        |                                            | Three Months
Ended
September 30,
|----------------------- | ------------------------------------------ | --------------------------------
|
|Basic EPS Computation   |                                            |                                 
|Numerator:              |                                            |                                 
|                        | Net income                                 |                                 
|                        |                                            |                                 
|Denominator:            |                                            |                                 
|                        | Weighted average common shares             |                                 
|                        |                                            |                                 
|Basic EPS               |                                            | $                               
|                        |                                            |                                 
|Diluted EPS Computation |                                            |                                 
|Numerator:              |                                            |                                 
|                        | Net income and assumed conversions         |                                 
|                        |                                            |                                 
|Denominator:            |                                            |                                 
|                        | Weighted average common shares outstanding |                                 
|                        | Stock options                              |                                 
|                        |                                            |                                 
|                        | Adjusted weighted average common shares    |                                 
|                        |                                            |                                 
|Diluted EPS             |                                            | $                               
|                        |                                            |                                 

---

QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>            5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
condensed consolidated balance sheets and the condensed consolidated
statements of operations of Forever Enterprises, Inc. filed as part
of Forever Enterprises, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
three months ended March 31, 2000, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such report.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      20,641,781
<SECURITIES>                               105,791,619
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,041,753
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    412,444
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           155,351,871
<PP&E>                                       9,259,680
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             209,339,739
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,871,771
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        69,334
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,052,154
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               209,339,739
<SALES>                                     13,430,281
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,966,676
<CGS>                                          520,001
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,316,174
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                66,378
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              91,764
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,283,120)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (376,739)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (906,381)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (906,381)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.13)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Telava Networks, Inc. (the "Company") on Form  10-QSB for the  period  ending October 31, 2007,  as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Baldwin Yung, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The  information contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ BaldwinYung

By: Baldwin Yung

Chief Executive and Financial Officer

December 17, 2007