alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 28 (Friday, February 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7946]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3393]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[OMB Control No. 9000-0014]


Clearance Request for Statement and Acknowledgment (Standard Form 
1413)

AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DOD), General Services Administration 
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Notice of request for an extension to an existing OMB clearance 
(9000-0014).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 
(44 U.S.C. 3501), the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Secretariat 
has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request to 
review and approve an extension of a currently approved information 
collection requirement concerning Statement and Acknowledgment 
(Standard Form 1413).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Fayson, Office of Federal 
Acquisition Policy, GSA (202) 501-4755.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

A. Purpose

    Standard Form 1413, Statement and Acknowledgment, will be used by 
all Executive Agencies, including the Department of Defense, to obtain 
a statement from contractors that the proper clauses have been included 
in subcontracts. The form includes a signed contractor acknowledgment 
of the inclusion of those clauses in the subcontract.

B. Annual Reporting Burden

    Public reporting burden for this collection of information is 
estimated to average .15 hours per response, including the time for 
reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and 
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the 
collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate 
or any other aspect of this collection of information, including 
suggestions for reducing this burden, to General Services 
Administration, FAR Secretariat, 18th & F Streets, NW., Room 4037, 
Washington, DC 20405, and to the FAR Desk Officer, Office of 
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 
Washington, DC 20503.
    The annual reporting burden is estimated as follows: Respondents, 
2,000; responses per respondent, 1.5; total annual responses, 3,000; 
preparation hours per response, .15; and total response burden hours, 
450.

OBTAINING COPIES OF PROPOSALS: Requester may obtain copies of OMB 
applications or justifications from the General Services 
Administration, FAR Secretariat (VRS), Room 4037, Washington, DC 20405, 
telephone (202) 501-4755. Please cite OMB Control No. 9000-0014, 
Statement and Acknowledgment, Standard Form 1413, in all 
correspondence.

    Dated: February 6, 1995.
Beverly Fayson,
FAR Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 95-3393 Filed 2-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-34-M
aaiv8kex103_6172011.htm







EXHIBIT 10.3







RESIGNATION

















To the Board of Directors of


Accelerated Acquisitions IV, Inc.,


a Delaware corporation







The undersigned, being an officer and director of the above-named corporation, does hereby resign from all positions as such officer and director of the corporation.







Said resignation is contingent and expressly conditioned upon (a) the sale of 17,000,000 shares of the Company’s common shares to Synergistic Holdings, LLC and (b) the appointment of successor directors and officers of the corporation. 







Said resignation shall be effective on the date of the Closing of the transaction contemplated by the Subscription Agreements between the Company and Synergistic Holdings, LLC.







Dated as of June 13, 2011








	  	
/s / Timothy Neher


	  	
Timothy Neher
**Exhibit 31.1**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

I, Richard E. Lundin, as Chief Executive Officer of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc.,certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: February 24, 2009 

 

 

66
EXHIBIT 10.21
 [ * ] = Certain confidential information contained in this document, marked by brackets, has
been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule
24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
  Addendum to Private Label Manufacturing and Supply Agreement
Agreement on Shipment Terms and Conditions for HM5 analyzers and HM5 reagent packs between Diatron
MI Plc. and Abaxis, Inc.
Union City, CA, USA
28 th February, 2008
 Parties agree on the following terms and conditions for VetScan HM5 analyzers and reagent packs.
 Prices:
 Ø
    
    Unit price of VetScan HM5 will change to [ * ]in remaining Calendar Q1, 2008.Ø
    
    Unit price of VetScan HM5 will change to [ * ]from 1st April, 2008 for another [ * ]units.Ø
    
    Unit price of HM5 reagent pack will remain [ * ].Ø
    
    Diatron will offer [ * ]for loaner units upon request from Abaxis (quantity negotiable).
 Units:
 Number of HM5
analyzers that will be ordered from Diatron by Abaxis in 2008
(excluding loaners):
 Ø
    
    2008 March:
    
    [ * ]Ø
    
    2008 April-June:
    
    [ * ]Ø
    
    2008 July-September:
    
    [ * ]Ø
    
    2008 October-December
    
    [ * ]Ø
    
    2009 January-March
    
    [ * ]
 Warranty terms:
 [ * ]
 Reagent business:
 Ø
    
    Abaxis guarantees to continue to buy HM5 reagent packs until reaching [ *]HM5 units shipped after 28 February 2008.Ø
    
    Abaxis will seek an alternate USA-based, lower landed cost reagent
supplier. Abaxis guarantees Diatron an opportunity to re-bid prior to any
commitment being made.
 Spare part conditions:
 Ø
    
    Diatron will reduce the prices of the spare parts by [ * ]to help the
Abaxis warranty costs. An updated list will be sent to Abaxis by 15th
March, 2008.Ø
    
    Diatron will offer [ * ]for servicing/repairing on specified spare parts
that are out of warranty. Repair/service price list will be sent to Abaxis by
15th March, 2008.
 Shipping charges:
 Ø
    
    Diatron will provide quotes on door-to-door prices for products which will
be different from the above, but based on the same unit prices.Ø
    
    HM5 units and reagents will be shipped [ * ]via ocean freight.Ø
    
    Payment terms will remain Net 30 days from date of invoice with [ * ]
discount for 14 days or [ * ]on presentation of invoice. Diatron has the right
to release invoices upon shipment of the goods.
 /s/ Donald P. Wood
Donald P. Wood, VP Operations
    
    /s/ Gábor Lengyel

Gábor Lengyel, Chief Executive OfficerAbaxis, inc.
    
    Diatron MI Plc
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-4686

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CHARLES KEE, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Shelby. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CR-96-53) Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 7, 2000 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. A. James Siemens, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Mark T. Calloway, United States Attorney, Brian Lee Whisler, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Charles Kee appeals his convictions and sentence for conspiracy to manufacture, distribute, or possess with intent to distribute cocaine and cocaine base and possession with intent to distribute cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841, 846 (1994). Finding no reversible error, we affirm. On appeal, Kee contends that the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. ___, 120 S.Ct. 2348 (2000), requires that his conviction and sentence be vacated.Because Kee’s sentence of 148 months does not exceed the twentyyear statutory maximum set out in 21 U.S.C.A. § 841(b)(1)(C) (West 1999) for the core offense without enhancement for drug quantity, we find that his sentence is permissible under Apprendi . United States v. Angle , Nos. 96-4662/4672, 99-4187, 2000 WL 1515159, *10 (4th Cir. Oct. 12, 2000); United States v. Aguayo-Delgado , 220 F.3d 926, 933 (8th Cir. 2000). Accordingly, we affirm Kee’s convictions and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
- • X \a/R -S3 61/-o\

To ^-nuR-T *C tlll.\w\iMAL- APPEALS oF TgxAs

P,ft.P,frJr ll-\(s^s rAPlTnl <, TATiflu s AusT/u, TiLkAS. 7 £ 7 / /

APP/ (r a*j T /a&kY n*& ^nfi<m \/.^ STATE oF T'ExAs

RECEIVED W-

^ „ <r / COURT OF CRaiBNAL APPEAIS

^ /»» 'A . NOV 09 206"°+/") , /".k, 6rAoi>e.r 5 2oi<r\APPi tr AmT ) re.cLe.tv€Ld a Post Car A

In a. J re-C^ivcA {APPLlCAAiTJ fl.o~7 LUrH o-f //a/->eas dor^us

QnA f>re.S&M4<Lcl f-f -fe* 4A-d_ CLourr*

~Thi<> /s /a inquiry , k>e.c-auii£_ o^^-r jSO days Aas Z-4pp>£

/ <am \r\^re-a)\itLtoQuj i/vau't r'\ma of -hhfL SJa-t-US Or

()iPPLlC*hiTs^ Af>p\ic.*V\C>N -For- llGl LUnf Of //^M5

Corpus , aKi cl 4-k-e- W[o\'\oi\i<> +/\tvf -Poiloio,,

(EXPLANATION (IE§U£3Je& )

^//^f /ft?,Z>1

(Apf>{fc**i+ Pro SeJ

TCt5# /2?V7z_6ZFtfr-f S-tec/Cfo*/ ~X 79 73ST
EXHIBIT 32.1CERTIFICATION     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, the undersigned certifies that (1) this Quarterly Report of MSX International, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal period ended October 1, 2006, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) theinformation contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.      /s/ Robert Netolicka  Robert Netolicka  Chief Executive Officer  November 14, 2006      /s/ Frederick K. Minturn  Frederick K. Minturn  Chief Financial Officer  November 14, 2006 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by section 906, has been providedto MSX International, Inc. and will be retained by MSX International, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as anexhibit to the form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the form 10-Q.
44
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 36 (Thursday, February 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10140-10141]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4436]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Airport Surface Movement Conference

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of conference.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
conference on Airport Surface Movement. FAA will solicit the public for 
input on technologies and procedural changes needed to implement and 
improve the airport safety and surface movement effort.

DATES: The conference will be held on Wednesday, March 8, 1995, through 
March 10, 1995.

[[Page 10141]] ADDRESSES: The conference will be held at the Arlington 
Renaissance Hotel, 950 North Stafford Street, Arlington, Virginia.

FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR TO RECEIVE A REGISTRATION FORM: Call 
(301) 949-7477, or Fax inquiries to (301) 949-5154, to the attention of 
Deana Lou.

    Issued in Washington, D.C. on February 1, 1995.
Michael J. Harrison,
Airport Surface Manager.
[FR Doc. 95-4436 Filed 2-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with
Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of American Superconductor Corporation (the Company) for the year ended March 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, Daniel P. McGahn, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/S/ DANIEL P. MCGAHN   
|Daniel P. McGahn       
|Chief Executive Officer

June 26, 2012
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 11

                FRONTIER NATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE



The following tabulation presents the calculation of basic and diluted earnings
per common share for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2000 and 1999.
Average shares outstanding have been retroactively adjusted on an equivalent
share basis for the effects of the stock dividend as discussed in the notes to
consolidated financial statements.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                           Three Months
                                          Ended March 31
                                      ----------------------
                                         2000        1999
                                      ----------  ----------
<S>                                   <C>         <C>

Basic Earnings Per Share:
 Net income.........................  $  684,019  $  578,436
                                      ----------  ----------

 Earnings on common shares..........  $  684,019  $  578,436
                                      ==========  ==========

 Weighted average common shares
  outstanding - basic...............   3,415,745   3,473,525
                                      ----------  ----------

 Basic earnings per common share....  $      .20  $      .17
                                      ----------  ----------

Diluted Earnings Per Share:
 Net income.........................  $  684,019  $  578,436
                                      ==========  ==========

 Weighted average common shares
  outstanding - diluted.............   3,461,848   3,518,658
                                      ----------  ----------

 Diluted earnings per common share..  $      .20  $      .16
                                      ----------  ----------

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Lawyer Media, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
William L. Pollak, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Stephen C.
Jacobs, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ WILLIAM L. POLLAK
William L. Pollak
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
November 10, 2003

/s/ STEPHEN C. JACOBS
Stephen C. Jacobs
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
November 10, 2003
#### JAMES I. ALBERTY, Administrator of the Estate of CHESTER ALBERTY, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF GREENSBORO, Defendant.

(Filed 21 May, 1941.)

Municipal Corporations § 14—

Nonsuit *held,*proper in this action to recover for death of intestate, who was killed when he failed to discover and take a curve in the street, but drove straight on into a ditch and trees growing near an old abandoned road.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Pless, Jr., J.,*at 3 February Term, 1941, of Guilford.

Affirmed.

*Harry R. Stanley for plaintiff, appellant.*

*Andrew Joyner, Jr., and H. G. Wilson for defendant, appellee.*

Per Ouriam.

Plaintiff’s action is for damages against the city of Greensboro for alleged negligence in failing to keep a portion of Randolph Avenue safe for travel. At the place the injury occurred there is a decided curve in the street, and straight ahead, in the direct line of travel, there is a disused road, formerly a part of the main way. This old road is not barricaded from the street, and the allegation is that the street was not sufficiently lighted at that point to enable the deceased to discover the surroundings. There was a slight declivity, a ditch, and trees growing near the old road which it is alleged were a source of danger, and the whole situation is alleged to be of such a character as to lure deceased into a trap.

Driving down this street with some companions late at night, deceased failed to take the curve, drove off the highway, and was killed.

We agree with the court below that there is no evidence to sustain a verdict for the plaintiff and the judgment as of nonsuit was proper.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3796 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3796

   To eliminate the opt-out for nonfederal governmental health plans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 10 (legislative day, March 7), 2022

  Mr. Murphy (for himself and Ms. Stabenow) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To eliminate the opt-out for nonfederal governmental health plans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Closing Health Coverage Gaps for 
Public Servants Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATING THE OPT-OUT FOR NONFEDERAL GOVERNMENTAL HEALTH 
              PLANS.

    Section 2722(a)(2) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 
300gg-21(a)(2)) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraph:
                    ``(F) Sunset of election option.--
                            ``(i) In general.--Notwithstanding the 
                        preceding provisions of this paragraph--
                                    ``(I) no election described in 
                                subparagraph (A) may be made on or 
                                after the date of enactment of this 
                                subparagraph; and
                                    ``(II) except as provided in clause 
                                (ii), no such election expiring on or 
                                after the date that is 180 days after 
                                the date of such enactment may be 
                                renewed.
                            ``(ii) Exception for certain collectively 
                        bargained plans.--Notwithstanding clause 
                        (i)(II), a plan described in subparagraph 
                        (B)(ii) that is subject to multiple agreements 
                        described in such subparagraph of varying 
                        lengths and that has an election in effect 
                        under subparagraph (A) as of the date of 
                        enactment of this subparagraph that expires on 
                        or after the date that is 180 days after the 
                        date of such enactment may extend such election 
                        until the date on which the term of the last 
                        such agreement expires.''.
                                 <all>
```