alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document

AMENDMENT TO 
MGP INGREDIENTS, INC. 
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT(S)


This Amendment to that/those Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement(s) listed on Schedule A to this Amendment (the "Designated Grant(s)") is made as of the ___ day of _____________, 20___, by and between MGP Ingredients, Inc., a Kansas corporation (the "Company"), and ____________________ ("Participant"). 


    WHEREAS, the Company granted Participant the Designated Grants under the MGP Ingredients, Inc. 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan") and subject to the terms and conditions of the Designated Grant(s)'s RSU Agreement; and 


WHEREAS, the Company desires to change the conditions required to qualify for "Retirement" under the Designated Grant(s)'s RSU Agreement from age 65 to a combination of age 60 and five years of service with the Company or its affiliates; 


    WHEREAS, the Designated Grant(s)'s RSU Agreement provides that any amendment must be set forth in a writing executed by the Company and Participant. 


    NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of Participant's continued employment with the Company, and for other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:


1.All capitalized terms used in this Amendment without definition or reference have the meanings set forth in the Designated Grant(s)'s RSU Agreement and the Plan. 


2.Section 6.a of the Designated Grant(s)'s RSU Agreement shall be deleted and replaced in its entirety as follows:


a.No forfeiture of any RSUs shall occur if the Participant's Separation from Service as an employee is on account of Disability, death, or Retirement. "Retirement" for purposes of this Agreement shall mean the Participant's Separation from Service with the Company or an Affiliate on or after the date the Participant attains the age of 60 and completes five (5) years of service with the Company or an Affiliate.


3.In all other respects, the Designated Grant(s)'s RSU Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.  


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment to the Designated Grant(s)'s RSU Agreement as of the date first written above. 


MGP INGREDIENTS, INC.                 PARTICIPANT


By:______________________________        _________________________________
Its: Vice President                    [Employee Name]


CORE/3001926.0072/177689914.3






Schedule A


List of Designated Grant(s)'s RSU Agreement(s) Being Amended


						
	Date of Grant	Number of RSUs Awarded
		
		
		
		
		
		
		




CORE/3001926.0072/177689914.3
---

Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Sandeep Vij, certify, that to my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MIPS Technologies, Inc. for the three months ended December 31, 2010 (the “Form 10-Q”), to which this certificate is an exhibit fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MIPS Technologies, Inc. for the three month period covered by the Form 10-Q.




Date: February 8, 2011
By:
/s/ SANDEEP VIJ

Sandeep Vij

President and Chief Executive Officer,

MIPS Technologies, Inc.


































A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided by MIPS Technologies and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2374

Quest Technologies dba Crystal Quest:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 41 (Thursday, March 2, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 11696]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5099]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Applications of Hemisphere International Airlines, Inc. for 
Issuance of New Certificate Authority

AGENCY: Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice of order to show cause (Order 95-2-49); Dockets 49791 
and 49792.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation is directing all interested 
persons to show cause why it should not issue an order (1) finding 
Hemisphere International Airlines, Inc., fit, willing, and able, and 
(2) awarding it certificates of public convenience and necessity to 
engage in interstate and foreign charter air transportation of property 
and mail.

DATES: Persons wishing to file objections should do so no later than 
March 13, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Objections and answers to objections should be filed in 
Dockets 49791 and 49792 and addressed to the Documentary Services 
Division (C-55, Room PL-401), U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, D.C. 20590 and should be served upon 
the parties listed in Attachment A to the order.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Janet A. Davis, Air Carrier 
Fitness Division (X-56, Room 6401), U.S. Department of Transportation, 
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, D.C. 20590, (202) 366-9721.

    Dated: February 24, 1995.
Patrick V. Murphy,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs.
[FR Doc. 95-5099 Filed 3-1-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6137

MARK FRENCH,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

OFFICER MICHAEL BIVENS; MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

Catherine C. Blake, Senior District Judge. (1:21-cv-02736-CCB)

Submitted: August 23, 2022 Decided: August 25, 2022

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, HEYTENS, Circuit Judge, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark French, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6137 Doc: 5 Filed: 08/25/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Mark French seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2254 petition as an unauthorized, successive § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable 

unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing 

of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When, as here, the district 

court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the 

dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of 

the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that French has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal.*

 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED

* To the extent that French wishes to obtain authorization from this court to file a 

successive § 2254 petition, he may file such a motion directly in this court pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 2244.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6137 Doc: 5 Filed: 08/25/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1


            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHNAGE ACT OF 1934
                         RULE 13a-14(b) OR 15d-14(b) AND
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


   In connection with the quarterly report of Kolorfusion International, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly
Report"), I, Stephen Nagel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify for
the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code, that:

      1.    the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

      2.    the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
            in all material respect, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company.


Dated: February 18, 2005                   By: /s/ Stephen Nagel
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           President and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 12735]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5561]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[Order No. 727]


Foreign-Trade Zones Board; Grant of Authority for Subzone Status; 
Smithkline Beecham Corporation (Pharmaceuticals) Bristol, TN

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

    Whereas, by an Act of Congress approved June 18, 1934, an Act ``To 
provide for the establishment . . . of foreign-trade zones in ports of 
entry of the United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, 
and for other purposes,'' as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u) (the Act), the 
Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) is authorized to grant to 
qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade 
zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs ports of entry;
    Whereas, the Board's regulations (15 CFR Part 400) provide for the 
establishment of special-purpose subzones when existing zone facilities 
cannot serve the specific use involved;
    Whereas, an application from the Industrial Board of Blount County, 
Tennessee, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 148, for authority to 
establish special-purpose subzone status at the pharmaceutical 
manufacturing plant of SmithKline Beecham Corporation, in Bristol, 
Tennessee, was filed by the Board on November 8, 1993, and notice 
inviting public comment was given in the Federal Register (FTZ Docket 
55-93, 58 FR 61065, 11-19-93); and,
    Whereas, the Board has found that the requirements of the FTZ Act 
and Board's regulations are satisfied, and that approval of the 
application is in the public interest;
    Now, Therefore, the Board hereby authorizes the establishment of a 
subzone (Subzone 148A) at the plant site of SmithKline Beecham 
Corporation, in Bristol, Tennessee, at the location described in the 
application, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, 
including Sec. 400.28.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 28th day of February 1995.
Susan G. Esserman,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration Alternate 
Chairman Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
    Attest:
John J. Da Ponte, Jr.,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-5561 Filed 3-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Bioenergy Research: Peoria, IL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    NCAUR Homepage
                    About BER
                        Mission Statement
                                    Strategic Goals
                                    Specialized Research ResourcesSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Peoria, Illinois National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research Bioenergy Research Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Research Projects Subjects of Investigation at this LocationEach ARS research project has related subjects of investigation.  Listed below are the subjects of investigation currently conducted at this location.
Clicking on a subject of investigation will list the research projects within that  subject of investigation.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Cite as 2015 Ark. 473

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

IN RE ARKANSAS SUPREME

COURT COMMITTEE ON CIVIL

PRACTICE

Opinion Delivered December 10, 2015

PER CURIAM

Ann Grimes, Esq., of Pulaski County, Robert Veach, Esq., of Pope County, David

Glover, Esq. of Pulaski County, are appointed to the Committee on Civil Practice for

three-year terms to expire on July 31, 2018. We thank them for accepting appointment to this

important committee.

We express our gratitude to the following members, whose terms have expired, for

their years of dedicated service to the Committee on Civil Practice: Judge Earnest Brown of 

Jefferson County; Judge Brandon Harrison of the Arkansas Court of Appeals; Michelle Ator,

Esq., of Pulaski County; Hani Hashem, Esq., of Drew County, and Professor John J. Watkins,

Committee Advisor, of Fayetteville.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 22-0307

_________________

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF:

JOSHUA ARNOLD BACON,

 Petitioner and Appellant,

 and

EMILY ANN BACON,

 Respondent and Appellee.

O R D E R

_________________

Upon consideration of Appellant Joshua Arnold Bacon’s Motion for Extension of 

Time and good cause appearing therefore, Appellant is GRANTED an extension of time 

to prepare, file, and serve his Reply Brief to and including March 13, 2023.

No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 8 2023

02/08/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0307
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2341

Reelcraft Industries:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
WIRE 

INSULATION

WIRE 

AWG

CLIP TO 

FIT TUBE 

SIZE (mm)

"L" ±12.7 

(mm) WIRE COLOR CONNECTOR COLOR

PVC 24 OR 26 7.9375 812.8 BLACK BLACKPVC 24 OR 26 7.9375 444.5 BLACK BLACK

STANDARD STD-GEN-026 2 PLACE ±0.05mmUNILATERAL AND OFFSET BILATERAL TOLERANCES ARE REGULATED BY 1 PLACE ±0.1mm0 PLACE ±0.5mmTOLERANCES:  : INDICATES A CRITICAL CHARACANGLES ±5°

NAME DATE

DRAWNCHECKEDAPPROVED

D

R0.50 x 4PLCS 11.88 R2 X 2PLCS

 7.33 

 23 

 17.50 

R4.49

R1

 2.50 

POTTED WITH EPOXY

HOUS

CASE AND CLIP MADE FROM POLYMERIC MATERIAL

 

6.6040

6.3754

 

 " L " SEE TABLE A 25.40 ±2.54
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 40 (Wednesday, March 1, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 11151]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4978]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50-245, 50-336, 50-423]


Northeast Utilities; Issuance of Director's Decision Under 10 CFR 
2.206

[Millstone Nuclear Power Station]
[License Nos. DPR-21, DPR-65, NPF-49]
    Notice is hereby given that the Acting Director, Office of 
Enforcement, has issued a decision concerning the Petitions filed by 
Ms. Carmela V. Marien and Ms. Marianne W. Nericcio on August 21, 1993. 
The Petitions requested that the NRC initiate an investigation and 
accelerated enforcement action against Northeast Utilities (Licensee) 
for willful violation of the employee protection provisions of 10 CFR 
50.7.
    After due consideration of Petitioner's assertions, the Acting 
Director, Office of Enforcement, has denied the Petitions. The reasons 
for the denial are explained in the ``Director's Decision under 10 CFR 
2.206'' (DD-95-04) which is available for public inspection in the 
Commission's Public Document Room at 2120 L Street NW., Washington, DC 
20555.
    A copy of this decision will be filed with the Secretary for the 
Commission's review in accordance with 10 CFR 2.206. As provided by 
this regulation, the decision will constitute the final action of the 
Commission 25 days after the date of issuance of the decision unless 
the Commission on its own motion institutes a review of the decision 
within that time.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 22nd day of February 1994.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Joseph R. Gray,
Acting Director, Office of Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 95-4978 Filed 2-28-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
EXHIBIT 32



Certification Under Section 906 of the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002 / 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



John R. Zavoli hereby certifies that:



1. He is the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Path 1
Network Technologies Inc.



2. The Form 10-Q report of Path 1
Network Technologies Inc. that this certification accompanies fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



3. The information contained in the Form 10-Q report of Path 1 Network Technologies Inc. that this certification accompanies fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Path 1 Network Technologies Inc.



Dated: August 12, 2004



|                  
|------------------
|/s/ JOHN R. ZAVOLI
|John R. Zavoli