alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| 1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:           May      8, 2008 |                                  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                                                                                    | /s/  William      L. Hodges |
|                                                                                    | William      L. Hodges                |
|                                                                                    | Chief      Financial Officer          |

----
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 03, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, July 03, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18I0238. THE ATLANTA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY d/b/a INVEST ATLANTA ET AL. v. ANSLEY WALK CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC..
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 2017CV296875
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than March 1, 2016.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:

                    1.                     *Bruce J. Essex, Jr. individually and as Trustee of the Bruce J. Essex, Jr. 2016 Revocable Trust; and the Bruce J. Essex, Jr. 2016 Revocable Trust, both of Spring Lake, Michigan (which will become part of the Essex Family Control Group), and Bruce J. Essex, Sr.,*                     individually, Twin Lake, Michigan; to acquire voting shares of Community Shores Bank Corporation, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Community Shores Bank both in Muskegon, Michigan.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 10, 2016.

Michael J. Lewandowski,

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2016-03048 Filed 2-12-16; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JEREMIAH BUSH,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 480 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 1st day of March, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 23(1)



                          Consent of Ernst & Young LLP


We consent to the incorporation by reference in: (1) the Registration Statement
(Form S-3 No. 333-14463) of ShoLodge, Inc. and in the related Prospectus; (2)
the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-52092) pertaining to the 1991 Stock
Option Plan of ShoLodge, Inc.; (3) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-29881) pertaining to the 1991 Stock Option Plan, as amended, of ShoLodge,
Inc.; and (4) the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-77910) of ShoLodge,
Inc. and in the related Prospectus, of our report dated March 22, 2002 (except
for Note 18, as to which the date is January 31, 2003), with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of ShoLodge, Inc. and
subsidiaries included in this Annual Report, as amended, (Form 10-K/A) for the
year ended December 30, 2001.



                                             /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Nashville, Tennessee
April 8, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.1



                                  EXHIBIT 32.1



                              Certification of CEO
            pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 regarding Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended July 31, 2006

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby
certify that:

         1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal period
ended July 31, 2006, (the Form 10Q-SB) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. Information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:    September 14, 2006             By: /s/ Joseph Kristul
         ------------------             -------------------------------------
                                        Joseph Kristul, Chief Executive Officer





<PAGE>


                              Certification of CFO
            pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 regarding Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended July 31, 2006

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby
certify that:

         1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal period
ended July 31, 2006, (the Form 10Q-SB) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. Information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:    September 14, 2006        By: /s/ Thomas Schott
         ------------------        -----------------------------------
                                   Thomas Schott, Chief Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman,

 Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

 Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 

September 1, 2017

Order 

Clerk

September 1, 2017

153081(118)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

SC: 153081

v COA: 325741

Genesee CC: 13-032654-FC

KENYA ALI HYATT,

Defendant-Appellee.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motions of the State Appellate Defender Office

to file a brief amicus curiae and for leave to file the brief late is GRANTED. The amicus 

brief submitted on August 31, 2017, is accepted for filing.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-11450

ESCO Group LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China. 

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Ex-99.2 a)

               MANAGEMENT ASSERTION REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE
                       UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM
                FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS MINIMUM SERVICING STANDARDS

As of and for the year ended June 30, 1999, Liberty Lending Services, Inc.
(Liberty Lending) has complied in all material respects with the minimum
servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's
Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers. As of and for this same
period, Liberty Lending had in effect a fidelity bond policy for $5,000,000 and
an errors and omissions policy for $5,000,000.

                                            /s/ Suzan D. Kranic
                                            -------------------------------
                                            Suzan D. Kranjc
                                            Senior Vice President - Finance

                                            9/2/99
                                            -------------------------------
                                            Date
#### BEULAH G. SMITH and ROYAL INDEMNITY COMPANY v. ROBERT L. FREEMAN.

(Filed 21 March, 1956.)

Appeal by plaintiffs from *Bone, J.,*December, 1955, Civil Term, of WILSON.

Civil action growing out of automobile collision that occurred 15 June, 1954, in a residential district of Elm City, North Carolina.

Plaintiff Smith was driving her Chrysler car east on Main Street. Defendant was driving his Ford car south on Anderson Street. Their cars collided within the intersection of these streets. Both cars were *693damaged and each driver sustained personal injuries. Each alleged that the collision was caused by the negligence of the other.

Royal Indemnity Company was made a party plaintiff because of a payment made by it to plaintiff Smith under a collision insurance policy on the Chrysler car.

Issues of negligence, contributory negligence and damages, arising on the pleadings, were submitted to the jury, as to plaintiffs’ action and separately as to defendant’s cross action. In respect of each set of issues, the jury answered both the negligence issue and the contributory negligence issue, “Yes,” and did not answer the issues relating to damages.

Judgment was entered, (1) that plaintiffs recover nothing on their action, (2) that defendant recover nothing on his cross action, and (3) that plaintiffs pay the costs. Plaintiffs excepted and appealed, assigning as error (1) the denial of plaintiff Smith’s motion for judgment of nonsuit as to defendant’s cross action, and (2) designated portions of the charge.

*Talmadge L. Narron for plaintiffs, appellants.*

*Dupree, Weaver & Montgomery for defendant, appellee.*

Per Cueiam.

We concur in Judge Bone’s denial of plaintiff Smith’s motion for judgment of nonsuit as to defendant’s cross action. The jury’s finding that negligence on the part of plaintiff Smith concurred with the negligence of defendant in proximately causing the collision is supported by competent evidence; and careful consideration of the charge fails to disclose prejudicial error. Hence, the verdict and judgment will not be disturbed.

No error.
#### F. E. FREEMAN, E. Y. PONDER, JACK PAYNE, GLENN RAMSEY, for Themselves and Such Other Citizens and Taxpayers of Madison County as May Make Themselves Parties to This Action, v. THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MADISON COUNTY.

(Filed 4 March, 1942.)

Appeal by defendant from *Nettles, J.,*at Chambers, 4 October, 1941. From Madison.

Affirmed.

This was a taxpayers’ suit to restrain tbe unlawful payment of public funds to John P. Rice, who, it was alleged, bad been elected by defendant Board as tax collector of Madison County without authority of law. From an order bolding tbe attempted election of Rice illegal and restraining defendant Board from paying tbe salary of tbe office to him, tbe defendant appealed.

*John H. McElroy and J. W. Haynes for plaintiff, appellee.*

*Roberts & Baley for defendant, appellant.*

Devin, J.

Tbe facts upon which tbe order appealed from was based are tbe same as those fully set out in *State ex rel. Hill v. Ponder and Rice, ante,*58. In tbat case tbe title to tbe public office of tax collector of Madison County was directly in issue, and it was there adjudicated tbat Roy Wade Ponder was tbe duly elected tax collector in and for Madison County, and tbat tbe attempted election of John P. Rice by defendant Board was without authority and of no effect. Hence tbe order of tbe court below restraining defendant Board from making payment of public funds to John P. Rice as tax collector must be

Affirmed.
----

Exhibit 32.1 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

The undersigned, Jingjun Hu, the Chief ExecutiveOfficer of HONG KONG WINALITE GROUP, INC. (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFYthat: 

1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the "Report"), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. Information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperation of the Company. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned hasexecuted this statement this 19th day of August 2008. 

| /s/ Jingjun Hu              |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Jingjun Hu                                                                                   |
| Chief Executive Officer                                                                      |
| (Principal Executive Officer)                                                                |

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Hong Kong Winalite Group, Inc. and will beretained by Hong Kong Winalite Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

The forgoing certification is being furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It isnot being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofthe Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of anygeneral incorporation language in such filing. 

----
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 37 (Friday, February 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 10385]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4513]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket Nos. RP92-137-016 and RP93-136-000 (Phase II)]


Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.; Notice of Informal 
Settlement Conference

February 17, 1995.
    Take notice that Commission Staff will convene an informal 
settlement conference in this proceeding on March 2, 1995, at 10:00 
a.m. The conference will be held in a hearing room at the offices of 
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 810 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, DC.
    Any party, as defined by 18 CFR 385.102(c), or any participant, as 
defined in 18 CFR 385.102(b), may attend. Persons wishing to become a 
party must move to intervene and receive intervenor status pursuant to 
the Commission's regulations, 18 CFR 385.214.
    For additional information, contact Donald Heydt at (202) 208-0740 
or Kenneth Ende at (202) 208-0762.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-4513 Filed 2-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 26, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-10412

Electrolux Home Products Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF l’EXAS~ 

AUS’flN 

, 

I:onorablc A. Xc. Fribbia 

o&ion Ho. 0. 

‘h3J Liablll 


’ . 

I 

The oonetAtutiona1 ~~0vtaiOns that epprorlah neara& to tti8 ~UfStiOri RX8 ~%ctinnc 1 end 2 of! &tic19 En 

Of the CO66titUtiW Of !ikiXYs , ,but wb' do not bclievr seid 

-;rorlaton6 ir$cda th6 oollootfo~'of thin tex. *&la %x%t~cn 1 

ron6S 8# fOllOW'at- 

-%f~~ixnti~ti ~h6ll b0 6&3i kna ~nmtm. All 

~ropcrty 1.n this :‘tuta, wbstlmr awntsd by nsewel 

peroons or cozporetiontn;a, other than mnio$gsl, 

c.haU be taxed $.a pro~ort%on to it6 value, WAQ& 

shell be ascsrtelued MD rdty be prmided~by lm. 

%%6 f.6&6.srFitW6 !26p ffS>OYa :6 POX1 t6X. It riay 

nrso i5lpoEe acoupution toxca, ~both upon czltur61 

geraou~ end 'upon corgorcrbiona, Other then ma&- 

01p&a, doing nay busiaaK8 in this ntace. ft. ri0y 

61~30 tex Inoomi~~cl? both notural prraonn cm& 00~ 

gorbtions other the.n m~~fcigcl, except tbot g!orson.3 unpqcd in mabarical~cnc! afyfoulturul pur-~ 

uu4t6 shall imr6T be ~Q&m? to psy ex 06aui?ation 

taxa ~roviCo5, tneC two bwdra5 and r+np dollsrn 

worth of housohoZd end kitchen furniture, bclongill.@ to eeoh rdlg in t&f6 Stet@.Khell ba sx6qti, 

f+ro?3 teX6tiOn, and prOVib0d further that the oaciipatlon~ tax 1cmisc bjr enp oounty, oity or town 'POP 

my pear on par3ona or o0rp0rnti0na puxtmln(as any 

profae6lon or buaine&wl ahall not cbxcaed one. h6X.i 

of the tax latiiod by th6 Sate tar the tratsr, period 

on auoh ~rofea6h.a or btihiettsi” 

TbS p6irt Or said ??60titXl 2 thet~daala ti%h OO6Ugl6tdOn t6X88 

f%ads es fOllOWSf 

"All ooonpetion Cnxca f&e%1 be-equal. und unlfOrm Upon the f.mz,Q 61S66 Of subjeota wlthfn the 

litit pi' ths suthozity lovying the Lur) . . ." 

%R:q, 

co11 c, f;otYch 

.-n
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Metretek Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, A. Bradley Gabbard, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

Date: March 30, 2004                     /s/  A. Bradley Gabbard
                                         -----------------------------------
                                         A. Bradley Gabbard
                                         Executive Vice President and
                                         Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 24, 2015

d1116

Order 

Clerk

November 24, 2015

150059(25)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 150059

COA: 322252

Kent CC: 03-004207-FC

SHAWN DEMETRIUS BRAGG ROSS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s February 3, 

2015 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.