alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 40 (Wednesday, March 1, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 11084]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4467]



[[Page 11084]]


ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-5157-3]


Public Water System Supervision Program Revision for the State of 
South Carolina

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the State of South Carolina is 
revising its approved State Public Water System Supervision Primacy 
Program. South Carolina has adopted drinking water regulations for 
Volatile Organic Chemicals, Synthetic Organic Chemicals and Inorganic 
Chemicals (known as the Phase V Rule of the National Primary Drinking 
Water Regulations). EPA has determined that the State program revisions 
are no less stringent than the corresponding federal regulations. 
Therefore, EPA has tentatively decided to approve the State program 
revisions.
    All interested parties may request a public hearing. A request for 
a public hearing must be submitted March 31, 1995 to the Regional 
Administrator at the address shown below. Frivolous or insubstantial 
requests for a hearing may be denied by the Regional Administrator. 
However, if a substantial request for a public hearing is made March 
31, 1995, a public hearing will be held. If no timely and appropriate 
request for a hearing is received and the Regional Administrator does 
not elect to hold a hearing on his/her own motion, this determination 
shall become final and effective thirty (30) days after publication in 
the Federal Register.
    Any request for a public hearing shall include the following: (1) 
The name, address, and telephone number of the individual, 
organization, or other entity requesting a hearing; (2) a brief 
statement of the requesting person's interest in the Regional 
Administrator's determination and a brief statement of the information 
that the requesting person intends to submit at such hearing; and (3) 
the signature of the individual making the request, or, if the request 
is made on behalf of an organization or other entity, the signature of 
a responsible official of the organization or other entity.

ADDRESSES: All documents relating to this determination are available 
for inspection between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday 
through Friday, at the following offices:

Department of Health and Environmental Control, 2600 Bull Street, 
Columbia, South Carolina 29201.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV, 345 Courtland Street, NE., 
Atlanta, Georgia 30365.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Philip H. Vorsatz, EPA, Region IV, 
Drinking Water Section at the Atlanta address given above or telephone 
(404) 347-2913.

(Sec. 1413 of the Safe Drinking Water Act, as amended (1986), and 40 
CFR parts 141 and 142 of the National Primary Drinking Water 
Regulations)

    Dated: February 2, 1995.
Patrick M. Tobin,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA, Region IV.
[FR Doc. 95-4467 Filed 2-28-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Docket ID FEMA-2016-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-1453]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Proposed Notice; withdrawal.

# SUMMARY:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is withdrawing its proposed notice concerning proposed flood hazard determinations, which may include the addition or modification of any Base Flood Elevation, base flood depth, Special Flood Hazard Area boundary or zone designation, or regulatory floodway (herein after referred to as proposed flood hazard determinations) on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps and, where applicable, in the supporting Flood Insurance Study reports for St. Clair County, Alabama, and Incorporated Areas.

# DATES:

This withdrawal is effective February 17, 2016.

# ADDRESSES:

                        You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA-B-1453, to Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-4064, or (email)                         *Luis.Rodriguez3@fema.dhs.gov.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-4064, or (email)                         *Luis.Rodriguez3@fema.dhs.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On December 11, 2014, FEMA published a proposed notice at 79 FR 73621, proposing flood hazard determinations for St. Clair County, Alabama, and Incorporated Areas. FEMA is withdrawing the proposed notice.

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4104; 44 CFR 67.4.

Date: January 22, 2016.

Roy E. Wright,

Deputy Associate Administrator for Insurance and Mitigation, Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2016-03225 Filed 2-16-16; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 9110-12-P
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 6 (Tuesday, January 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 2579]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-495]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP94-158-006]


Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

January 4, 1995.
    Take notice that on December 27, 1994, Columbia Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Columbia), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to be 
effective October 1, 1994.

Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 96
Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 97

    Columbia states that the instant filing is being made to revise 
Columbia's October 6, 1994, filing in Docket No. RP94-158-002, which 
sets forth the monthly amount allocated to the Account No. 191 direct 
bill of each customer for the elected amortization periods at the 
current FERC interest rates.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol 
Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rule 211 of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. All such protests 
should be filed on or before January 11, 1995. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Copies of Columbia's filings are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-495 Filed 1-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.1



Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United Sates Code)





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Adams Golf, Inc, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify that:
The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the "Periodic Report") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  | ADAMS GOLF, INC.                     
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|                   |  |                                      
|Date:  Aug 8, 2005 |  | By:/S/ OLIVER G. BREWER III          
|                   |  | Oliver G. Brewer, III                
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer and President
|                   |  |                                      
|Date:  Aug 8, 2005 |  | By:/S/ ERIC LOGAN                    
|                   |  | Eric Logan                           
|                   |  | Chief Financial Officer              
|                   |  | (Principal Financial Officer)        





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Act and is not being filed as part of the Periodic Report or as a separate disclosure document
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Adams Golf, Inc. and will be retained by Adams Golf, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-2507

HP Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 50107 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee

v. DENNIS ARMANDO ROSALES-ALVARADO,
Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:16 -CR- 211 -1

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Dennis Armando Rosales

- Alvarado pleaded guilty to illegal reentry into the United States and was sentenced above the advisory guidelines range to 52 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. In his only argument on appeal, he asserts that because the indictment did not allege that he had a prior felony conviction, his sentence exceeded the two

- year statutory maximum sentence set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and violated his due process

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 29, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-50107 Document: 00514176676 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/29/2017No. 17

- 50107

2 rights. He concedes that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez- Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but states that he seeks to preserve it for possible future review because recent decisions indicate that the Supreme Court may reconsider the issue. See Alleyne v. United States , 133 S. Ct. 215 1 (2013). The Government has filed a motion for summary affirmance. Summary affirmance is proper when, among other instances, “the position of one of the parties is clearly right as a matter of law so that there can be no substantial question as to the o utcome of the case.” Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162

- 63 (5th Cir. 1969). As Rosales

- Alvarado concedes, his due process argument is foreclosed by Almendarez- Torres . The Supreme Court’s subsequent decisions in Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Alleyne did not overrule AlmendarezTorres

. See United States v. Juarez-Duarte , 513 F.3d 204, 211 (5th Cir. 2008); United States v. Wallace , 759 F.3d 486, 497 (5th Cir. 2014). Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment is AFFIRMED. Case: 17-50107 Document: 00514176676 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/29/2017
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 15

- 00289

- CR

WAYLAND EARL BAILEY, JR. APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------
FROM THE 43RD DISTRI CT COURT OF PARKER C OUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. CR11

- 0741

---------- 

### MEMORAND UM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT ON PERMANENT ABATEMENT OF APPEAL

----------
We have considered Appellant Wayland Earl Bailey, Jr.’s “Motion to
Permanently Abate” this appeal. Attached to the motion is the certificate of death
showing that Bailey died on Novem ber 24, 2015.

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47. 1

.2

The death of an appellant during the pendency of an appeal deprives this
court of jurisdiction. Molitor v. State , 862 S.W.2d 615, 616 (Tex. Crim. App.

1 993). Under these circumstances, the appropriate disposition is the permanent

abatement of the appeal. See T ex

. R. App

. P . 7.1(a)(2)

. No decision of this court having been delivered prior to the receipt of this

mot ion, the court finds the motion should be granted. It is therefore ordered,
adjudged, and decreed that the appeal is permanent ly abated.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, GABRIEL, and SUDDERTH, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: February 11 , 2016
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 26, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-1155

Kohler Co:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1721

BOMAG Americas, Inc:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_5-30-2019.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4095 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4095

To require the Securities and Exchange Commission to require reporting 
of sourcing and due diligence activities of companies involving supply 
 chains of products that are imported into the United States that are 
   directly linked to products utilizing forced labor from Xinjiang, 
                     China, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 27, 2022

Mr. Scott of Florida (for himself, Mr. Rubio, and Mr. Braun) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                 on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Securities and Exchange Commission to require reporting 
of sourcing and due diligence activities of companies involving supply 
 chains of products that are imported into the United States that are 
   directly linked to products utilizing forced labor from Xinjiang, 
                     China, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Transaction and Sourcing Knowledge 
Act'' or the ``TASK Act''.

SEC. 2. SEC REPORTING.

    The Securities and Exchange Commission, as part of its evaluation 
of potential guidance on reporting on environmental, social, and 
governance matters by publicly traded companies, shall require 
reporting of--
            (1) sourcing and due diligence activities of such companies 
        involving supply chains of products that are imported into the 
        United States that are directly linked to products utilizing 
        forced labor from Xinjiang, China;
            (2) transactions with companies that have been--
                    (A) placed on the Entity List by the Department of 
                Commerce; or
                    (B) designated by the Department of the Treasury as 
                Chinese Military-Industrial Complex Companies; and
            (3) with respect to publicly traded United States companies 
        with facilities in China, on an annual basis--
                    (A) whether there is a Chinese Communist Party 
                committee in the operations of the company; and
                    (B) a summary of the actions and corporate 
                decisions in which any committee described in 
                subparagraph (A) may have participated.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit No. 23

# Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos.
333-66070, 333-44868, 333-107909, 333-107908, 333-47407, 333-64643, 33-67288 and 33-48500)
of United Retail Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the Company) of our reports
dated April 27, 2005, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule, which appear in this Form 10-K.

|                                                               | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Stamford, ConnecticutApril 29, 2005 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 27 (Wednesday, February 10, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7100-7101]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02661]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice to All Interested Parties of the Termination of the 
Receivership of 10293, Haven Trust Bank Florida, Ponte Vedra Beach, 
Florida

    Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation (``FDIC'') as Receiver for Haven Trust Bank Florida, Ponte 
Vedra Beach, Florida (``the Receiver'') intends to terminate its 
receivership for said institution. The FDIC was appointed receiver of 
Haven Trust Bank Florida on September 24, 2010. The liquidation of the 
receivership assets has been completed. To the extent permitted by 
available funds and in accordance with law, the Receiver will be making 
a final dividend payment to proven creditors.
    Based upon the foregoing, the Receiver has determined that the 
continued existence of the receivership will serve no useful purpose. 
Consequently, notice is given that the receivership shall be 
terminated, to be effective no sooner than thirty days after the date 
of this Notice. If any person wishes to comment concerning the 
termination of the receivership, such comment must be made in writing 
and sent within thirty days of the date of this Notice to: Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation, Division of Resolutions and 
Receiverships, Attention: Receivership Oversight Department 32.1, 1601 
Bryan Street, Dallas, TX 75201.
    No comments concerning the termination of this receivership will be 
considered which are not sent within this time frame.

    Dated: February 5, 2016.


[[Page 7101]]


Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-02661 Filed 2-9-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6714-01-P