alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3701 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3701

   To exempt commercial truck drivers from Canada or Mexico who are 
 seeking to temporarily enter the United States for business through a 
     land port of entry from any COVID-19 vaccination requirement.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 17, 2022

 Mr. Scott of Florida (for himself, Mr. Marshall, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. 
Braun, Mr. Lee, Mr. Hoeven, Mr. Cramer, and Mr. Hawley) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
               Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To exempt commercial truck drivers from Canada or Mexico who are 
 seeking to temporarily enter the United States for business through a 
     land port of entry from any COVID-19 vaccination requirement.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLES.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Terminating Reckless and Unnecessary 
Checks Known to Erode Regular Shipping Act'' or the ``TRUCKERS Act''.

SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM COVID-19 VACCINATION REQUIREMENT.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of 
Homeland Security may not impose any COVID-19 vaccination requirement 
on any commercial truck driver who is a national of Canada or of Mexico 
and is seeking to temporarily enter the United States for business 
through a land port of entry.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 33 (Friday, February 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9329-9330]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3978]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Project No. 2493-006-WA]


Puget Sound Power & Light Co; Notice of Intent to Hold a Public 
Meeting in Snoqualmie, Washington, and a Public Meeting in Kirkland, 
Washington, to Discuss Staff's Draft Environmental Impact Statement 
(DEIS) for the Snoqualmie Falls Hydroelectric Project

February 13, 1995.
    On November 15, 1994, the Commission staff mailed the Snoqualmie 
Falls DEIS to the Environmental Protection Agency, resource and land 
management agencies, and interested organizations and individuals. This 
documents evaluates the environmental consequences of operating the 
applicant's existing 42-megawatt (MW) hydroelectric project, located on 
the Snoqualmie River, approximately 25 miles east of Seattle in western 
Washington.
    The applicant proposes extensive structural modifications of the 
existing project facilities and construction of additional project 
facilities needed to expand the project from 42 MW to 72 
[[Page 9330]] MW; hydraulic capacity would increase from 2,500 to 3,620 
cubic feet per second.
    The subject DEIS also evaluates the environmental effects of: 
additional flow options and supplemental measures with the applicant's 
proposal; a minor upgrade; decommissioning the project; and the no 
action alternative.
    The public meetings on the Snoqualmie Falls Project will be 
recorded by an official stenographer. The first meeting will be held 
from 6:30 P.M. to 11 P.M. on Wednesday, March 1, 1995, at the Mount Si 
High School in Snoqualmie, Washington. The second meeting will be held 
from 6:30 P.M. to 11 P.M. on Thursday, March 2, 1995, at Lake 
Washington Technical College, West Building 4th floor auditorium, 132nd 
Avenue N.E., Kirkland, Washington.
    At the subject meeting, resource agency personnel and other 
interested persons will have the opportunity to provide oral and 
written comments and recommendations regarding the Snoqualmie Falls 
DEIS for the Commission's public record.
    For further information, please contact Kathleen Sherman, at (202) 
219-2834.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-3978 Filed 2-16-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 37 (Friday, February 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 10422]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4577]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Public Information Collection Requirements Submitted to OMB for 
Review

February 17, 1995.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Public Law 96-511. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

OMB Number: New
Form Number: IRS Form 8498
Type of Review: New collection
Title: Program Sponsor Agreement for Continuing Education for Enrolled 
Agents
Description: This information relates to the approval of continuing 
professional education programs for individuals enrolled to practice 
before the Internal Revenue Service (enrolled agents).
Respondents: Individuals or households, Business or other for-profit
Estimated Number of Respondents: 500
Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 36 minutes
Frequency of Response: Other
Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 300 hours

OMB Number: 1545-0735
Regulation ID Number: LR-189-80 (T.D. 7927) Final
Type of Review: Extension
Title: Amortization of Reforestation Expenditures
Description: Section 194 of the Internal Revenue Code allows taxpayers 
to elect amortize certain reforestation expenditures meet certain 
requirements. The regulations implement this election provision and 
allow the Service to determine if the election is proper and allowable.
Respondents: Individuals or households, Business or other for-profit, 
Farms
Estimated Number of Respondents: 12,002
Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 30 minutes
Frequency of Response: Annually
Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 6,001 hours
Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear, (202) 622-3869, Internal Revenue 
Service, Room 5571, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224
OMB Reviewer: Milo Sunderhauf, (202) 395-7340, Office of Management and 
Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 
20503.
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-4577 Filed 2-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
EX-10.3


  Ex 10.3

  FIRST AMENDMENT TO 

  LINDSAY CORPORATION

  2015 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

   

  WHEREAS, Lindsay Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), previously established the 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”);

   

  WHEREAS, FASB Accounting Standards Update 2016-09 increased the allowable statutory tax withholding threshold to qualify for equity classification from the minimum statutory withholding requirements to the maximum statutory tax rate in the applicable jurisdiction;

   

  WHEREAS, the Board has determined it is in the Company’s best interest to provide for net share settlement under the Plan subject to the terms and conditions set forth below; and

   

  WHEREAS, Section 16.1 of the Plan authorizes the Board to amend the Plan.

   

  NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended as follows:

   

  1.Section 5.4 shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


   

  5.4	Cashless Exercise.  To the extent permitted by applicable law, the Option Price and any applicable statutory maximum withholding taxes may be paid from the proceeds of sale through a bank or broker on the date of exercise of some or all of the Shares to which the exercise relates.

  2.Section 13 shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


   

  13.	Withholding Taxes.  To the extent that the Company is required to withhold federal, state, local or foreign taxes in connection with any payment made or benefit realized by a Participant or other person under this Plan, it shall be a condition to the receipt of such payment or the realization of such benefit that the Participant or such other person make arrangements satisfactory to the Company for payment of all such taxes required to be withheld.  At the discretion of the Committee, such arrangements may include relinquishment of a portion of such benefit.  The Fair Market Value of any Shares withheld or tendered to satisfy any such tax withholding obligations shall not exceed the amount determined by the applicable maximum statutory tax withholding rates.

  3.Capitalized terms used in this First Amendment and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Plan.  Except as specifically modified herein, all terms and conditions of the Plan shall remain in effect.


   

  

   

   

   

  Executed this 18th day of October 2022 by a duly authorized officer of the Company.

   

  LINDSAY CORPORATION

   

   

   

  By: /s/ Eric R. Arneson

  Name: Eric R. Arneson

  Title: General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 38 (Monday, February 27, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 10534]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4695]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 95-30, RM-8578]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Madisonville, Texas

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission requests comments on a petition filed by Leon 
Hunt, d/b/a Hunt Broadcasting, proposing the allotment of Channel 272A 
to Madisonville, Texas, as the community's second local commercial FM 
service. Channel 272A can be allotted to Madisonville in compliance 
with the Commission's minimum distance separation requirements with a 
site restriction of 7.0 kilometers (4.3 miles) northwest to avoid a 
short-spacing conflict with the licensed site of Station KMJQ(FM), 
Channel 271C, Houston, Texas. The coordinates for Channel 272A are 31-
00-25 and 95-56-30.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before April 14, 1995, and reply 
comments on or before May 1, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, D.C. 20554. 
In addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner, or its counsel or consultant, as follows: 
Christopher D. Imlay, Esq., Booth, Freret and Imlay, 1233-20th Street, 
NW, Suite 204, Washington, D.C. 20554 (Counsel for petitioner).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 95-30, adopted February 
9, 1995, and released February 21, 1995. The full text of this 
Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during 
normal business hours in the FCC's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M 
Street, NW, Washington, D.C. The complete text of this decision may 
also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, ITS, Inc., 
(202) 857-3800, 2100 M Street, NW, Suite 140, Washington, D.C. 20037.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 95-4695 Filed 2-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
#### MRS. W. L. HUTCHISON, CHARLES L. HUTCHISON and wife, GLADYS S. HUTCHISON, plaintiffs, v. CAROLINA AND SOUTHERN PROCESSING COMPANY, defendant.

(Filed 24 September, 1958.)

Injunctions § 4b—

Order denying application for a temporary order restraining defendant from continuing to operate its plant on lands contiguous to lands owned by plaintiffs, demanded on the ground that such operation constituted a nuisance, affirmed on authority of *HusMns v. Hospital,*238 N.C. 357.

Parker, J., not sitting.

Appeal by plaintiffs from *Dan K. Moore, J.,*April Term, 1958, of GASTON.

Civil action wherein plaintiffs allege that the operation of defendant’s processing plant constitutes a nuisance; and plaintiffs seek (1) damages, and (2) a permanent injunction to abate the alleged nuisance.

After notice and hearing, the court signed an order denying plaintiffs’ application for “a temporary order . . . restraining the defendant . . . from continuing to operate its plant and maintain such nuisance on the land contiguous to the land of these plaintiffs ...”

Plaintiffs’ appeal is based upon their exception to this interlocutory order.

*Hugh, W. Johnston, for plaintiffs, appellants.*

*Sidney J. Stern and Mullen, Holland & Cooke for defendant, ap-pellee.*

Per Curiam.

The affidavits offered and considered at the hearing afforded -sufficient factual basis for the court, in its discretion, to deny plaintiffs’ application that defendant be restrained pending final determination of the cause. Hence, the -order is affirmed.

The applicable legal principles are fully stated in *Huskins v. Hospital,*238 N.C. 357, 78 S.E. 2d 116.

Affirmed.

Paricer, J., not sitting.
Year Cost Rate

Income 

Rate

Annual 

Balance

2005 11.13 12.72 1.59 320

2006 11.00 12.73 1.73 337

2007 10.95 12.74 1.79 355

2008 10.99 12.78 1.80 371

2009 11.13 12.77 1.65 384

2010 11.25 12.79 1.54 397

2011 11.42 12.84 1.42 407

2012 11.67 12.87 1.20 416

2013 11.93 12.90 0.97 422

2014 12.21 12.92 0.71 427

2015 12.49 12.94 0.45 430

2016 12.79 12.96 0.17 431

2017 13.09 12.98 -0.12 430

2018 13.40 13.00 -0.40 428

2019 13.71 13.01 -0.69 425

2020 14.03 13.03 -1.00 420

2021 14.34 13.05 -1.29 414

2022 14.65 13.07 -1.58 407

2023 14.95 13.09 -1.87 399

2024 15.25 13.11 -2.15 389

2025 15.55 13.12 -2.42 378

2026 15.83 13.14 -2.69 365

2027 16.10 13.16 -2.94 352

2028 16.34 13.17 -3.16 338

2029 16.55 13.19 -3.36 324

2030 16.74 13.20 -3.54 308

2031 16.92 13.21 -3.71 292

2032 17.08 13.22 -3.86 275

2033 17.20 13.23 -3.97 258

2034 17.30 13.24 -4.06 240

2035 17.37 13.24 -4.13 222

2036 17.44 13.25 -4.18 204

2037 17.48 13.25 -4.22 184

2038 17.50 13.26 -4.24 165

2039 17.51 13.26 -4.25 145

2040 17.52 13.26 -4.26 124

2041 17.52 13.26 -4.26 103

2042 17.53 13.27 -4.27 82

2043 17.54 13.27 -4.27 60

2044 17.54 13.27 -4.27 37

2045 17.55 13.27 -4.28 14

2046 17.56 13.27 -4.29 ----

2047 17.58 13.27 -4.31 ----

2048 17.60 13.28 -4.32 ----

2049 17.62 13.28 -4.34 ----

2050 17.64 13.28 -4.36 ----

2051 17.68 13.28 -4.39 ----

2052 17.71 13.29 -4.43 ----

2053 17.75 13.29 -4.47 ----

2054 17.80 13.29 -4.51 ----

2055 17.84 13.30 -4.55 ----

2056 17.89 13.30 -4.60 ----

2057 17.95 13.30 -4.65 ----

2058 18.00 13.31 -4.69 ----

2059 18.05 13.31 -4.74 ----

2060 18.10 13.31 -4.79 ----

2061 18.16 13.32 -4.84 ----

2062 18.22 13.32 -4.90 ----

2063 18.28 13.32 -4.95 ----

2064 18.34 13.33 -5.01 ----

2065 18.40 13.33 -5.07 ----

2066 18.46 13.34 -5.12 ----

2067 18.52 13.34 -5.18 ----

2068 18.57 13.34 -5.23 ----

2069 18.63 13.35 -5.28 ----

2070 18.67 13.35 -5.32 ----

2071 18.72 13.35 -5.37 ----

2072 18.77 13.36 -5.41 ----

2073 18.81 13.36 -5.45 ----

2074 18.85 13.36 -5.49 ----

2075 18.90 13.36 -5.53 ----

2076 18.94 13.37 -5.58 ----

2077 18.99 13.37 -5.62 ----

2078 19.03 13.37 -5.66 ----

2079 19.08 13.37 -5.70 ----

2080 19.12 13.38 -5.75 ----

Summarized Rates: OASDI

2005 Cost Rate Income Rate

Actuarial 

Balance

-2079 15.30% 14.01% -1.29% 0.64%

Office of the Chief Actuary, Social Security

Estimates based on Intermediate Assumptions of the 2005 Trustees Report January 4, 2006

Detailed Single Year Tables

Category of Change: Trust Fund Investment in Equities

Change in 

Actuarial Balance

Proposed Provision: Invest 40 percent of the Trust Funds in equities (phased in 2006-2020), assuming 

an ultimate 5.5 percent real rate of return on equities

Expressed as a percentage of taxable payroll Trust Fund 

Ratio 

1-1-year
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 6 (Tuesday, January 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 2583]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-494]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP94-187-004]


Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

January 4, 1995.
    Take notice that on December 29, 1994, Tennessee Gas Pipeline 
Company (Tennessee), filed Third Sub Original Sheet No. 22A for a 
proposed effective date of August 22, 1994, and Sub First Revised Sheet 
No. 22A and Second Sub First Revised Sheet No. 22A for a proposed 
effective date of November 1, 1994.
    Tennessee states that the revised tariff sheets are in compliance 
with a December 8, 1994 Letter Order, issued pursuant to 
Sec. 375.307(b)(1) and (b)(3) by OPR--Rate Analysis Branch I in Docket 
No. RP94-187-003. The Letter Order directed Tennessee to file revised 
tariff sheets to effect a correction to the language in footnote 1 of 
the tariff sheets.
    Tennessee states that copies of the filing have been mailed to all 
of its jurisdictional customers and affected state regulatory 
commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest with reference to said filing should 
file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North 
Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with 
Section 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 
385.211. All such protests should be filed on or before January 11, 
1995. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to this proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file and 
available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-494 Filed 1-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### STATE v. C. J. GIBSON.

(Filed 8 January, 1932.)

Husband and Wife A c — Misrepresentation of wife before marriage that she was pregnant is no defense in prosecution for wilful abandonment.

The false representations of the prosecutrix that she was pregnant before the marriage is no defense in a criminal action against the husband for wilful abandonment.

Appeal by defendant from *McElroy, J.,*at May Term, 1931, of BctNcombe.

No error.

*Attorney-General Brummüt and Assistanl Attorney-General Seawell for the Stale.*

*Thomas A. Gurry for defendant.*

Pek Curiam.

The defendant was indicted for wilful abandonment of his wife. On appeal the chief contention was that the defendant’s consent to the marriage was procured by the false representation of the prosecutrix before the marriage that she was pregnant. It has been held that this is not a sufficient cause for the annulment of the marriage *(Bryant v. Bryant,*171 N. C., 746), and if not, it is obviously not a sufficient cause for collaterally assailing the validity of the marriage in a distinct iiroceeding. "We have examined all the exceptions and find no error.

No error.
#### Oliver L. Jones, Appellant, v. Lillian L. Jones and others, Respondents.

Order affirmed, •with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Opinion

*Per Cariam.*
```

[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 28, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 10844]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4817]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket Nos. RP93-189-003 and RP94-38-002]

Texas Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

February 22, 1995.
    Take notice that on February 17, 1995, Texas Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Texas Gas) tendered for filing the following revised 
tariff sheets to its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 1:

First Revised Sheet No. 20
First Revised Sheet No. 21
First Revised Sheet No. 22
First Revised Sheet No. 23

    Texas Gas states that the revised tariff sheets are being filed to 
implement Article IV of the Stipulation and Agreement of Partial 
Settlement (Settlement) pursuant to Rule 602 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure filed on September 20, 1994. The Settlement 
was intended to resolve all issues in Texas Gas's pending Order No. 528 
cost recovery filing in the dockets referenced above. The Settlement 
contained pro forma tariff sheets in Appendix B. The revised tariff 
sheets listed above are identical to such pro forma tariff sheets and 
are to be effective January 20, 1995, the effective date of the 
Settlement, as described in Article IV.
    Texas Gas states that copies of the revised tariff sheets are being 
mailed to Texas Gas's jurisdictional customers, interested state 
commissions, and those appearing on the official service lists of 
Docket Nos. RP93-189 and RP94-38.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sec. 385.211 of 
the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests should be 
filed on or before March 3, 1995. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this 
filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-4817 Filed 2-27-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 22

- 00334

- CR

Michael Peter Nightingale v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the 249th District Court of Johnson County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- F201900499

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having co nsidered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed

. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. May 4, 2023