alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                    AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Lawyer Media, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), William L.
Pollak, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Stephen C. Jacobs, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ WILLIAM L. POLLAK
------------------------------
William L. Pollak
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
August 12, 2003


/s/ STEPHEN C. JACOBS
------------------------------
Stephen C. Jacobs
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
August 12, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the quarterly report of Golden State Vintners, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey B. O'Neill, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbannes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/JEFFREY B. O'NEILLJeffrey B. O'Neill
Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2003 |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                                                                                  |  | 

---

QuickLinks
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-2146

VIJAYKUMAR A. PATEL; BHAVANABEN B. PATEL, Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v. MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (8:05-cv-01304-PJM) Submitted: March 12, 2008 Decided: March 25, 2008 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. R. Scott Oswald, Nicholas W. Woodfield, EMPLOYMENT LAW GROUP, PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellants. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Tarra DeShields-Minnis, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Vijaykumar A. Patel and his wife, Bhavanaben B. Patel, natives and citizens of India, appeal the district court’s order denying their motion for reconsideration of its dismissal of their declaratory judgment action. In their action, the Patels sought to challenge the regulation set forth at 8 C.F.R. § 1245.10(j) (2007) as ultra vires. Because the Patels failed to raise any issues pertaining to the propriety of the district court’s finding that it lacked jurisdiction over their challenges to the regulation, we find that they failed to preserve any issues for review. SeeFed. R. App. P. 28(a)(9)(A) (“[T]he argument . . . must contain . . . appellant’s contentions and the reasons for them, with citations to the authorities and parts of the record on which the appellant relies.”); Edwards v. City of Goldsboro , 178 F.3d 231, 241 n.6 (4th Cir. 1999) (“Failure to comply with the specific dictates of [Rule 28] with respect to a particular claim triggers abandonment of that claim on appeal.”). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Patel v. Chertoff , No. 8:05-cv-01304- PJM (D. Md. Aug. 31, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-14-00125-CR

CHARLES RAY MILLER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 8th District Court

Hopkins County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1423722

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In cause numbers 06-14-00120-CR through 06-14-00129-CR, Charles Ray Miller appeals 

from ten separate convictions for indecency with a child by contact. Miller has filed a single 

brief in which he raises an issue common to all of his appeals. Miller argues that he received 

ineffective assistance of counsel during the punishment phase of his trial. 

We addressed this issue in detail in our opinion of this date on Miller’s appeal in cause 

number 06-14-00120-CR. For the reasons stated therein, we likewise conclude in this matter that 

Miller failed to demonstrate (1) that his counsel’s performance fell below an objective standard 

of reasonableness and (2) that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s 

unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. Strickland v. 

Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) ); Ex parte Imoudu, 284 S.W.3d 866, 869 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2009).

Consequently, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Jack Carter

Justice

Date Submitted: December 11, 2014

Date Decided: December 12, 2014

Do Not Publish
Year Cost Rate

Income 

Rate

Annual 

Balance

2008 11.20 12.77 1.57 359

2009 11.26 12.81 1.54 369

2010 11.37 12.82 1.46 378

2011 11.53 12.84 1.31 386

2012 11.76 12.87 1.11 392

2013 12.03 12.90 0.87 394

2014 12.32 12.92 0.60 395

2015 12.61 12.94 0.33 393

2016 12.91 12.96 0.05 390

2017 13.22 12.98 -0.23 386

2018 13.49 13.00 -0.49 380

2019 13.76 13.02 -0.74 373

2020 14.02 13.04 -0.98 365

2021 14.26 13.06 -1.20 357

2022 14.47 13.07 -1.40 349

2023 14.67 13.08 -1.58 339

2024 14.84 13.10 -1.75 329

2025 15.00 13.11 -1.90 319

2026 15.14 13.12 -2.02 308

2027 15.26 13.13 -2.13 297

2028 15.37 13.14 -2.23 285

2029 15.45 13.15 -2.31 273

2030 15.51 13.15 -2.35 262

2031 15.53 13.16 -2.38 250

2032 15.54 13.16 -2.38 238

2033 15.51 13.16 -2.35 226

2034 15.45 13.16 -2.29 215

2035 15.37 13.16 -2.22 204

2036 15.28 13.15 -2.13 194

2037 15.17 13.15 -2.02 184

2038 15.04 13.15 -1.90 174

2039 14.90 13.14 -1.76 166

2040 14.74 13.13 -1.61 158

2041 14.58 13.13 -1.45 151

2042 14.41 13.12 -1.29 144

2043 14.24 13.11 -1.13 139

2044 14.07 13.10 -0.97 134

2045 13.91 13.10 -0.81 131

2046 13.75 13.09 -0.66 128

2047 13.59 13.08 -0.51 127

2048 13.43 13.07 -0.36 126

2049 13.28 13.07 -0.21 126

2050 13.13 13.06 -0.07 128

2051 13.00 13.05 0.06 130

2052 12.86 13.05 0.19 134

2053 12.73 13.04 0.31 138

2054 12.61 13.04 0.43 144

2055 12.49 13.03 0.54 150

2056 12.37 13.03 0.65 158

2057 12.26 13.02 0.76 167

2058 12.15 13.02 0.87 177

2059 12.04 13.01 0.97 188

2060 11.93 13.01 1.08 200

2061 11.82 13.00 1.18 213

2062 11.72 13.00 1.28 228

2063 11.61 12.99 1.38 244

2064 11.51 12.99 1.48 261

2065 11.41 12.98 1.57 279

Detailed Single Year Tables

Category of Change: Level of Monthly Benefits (PIA)

Proposed Provision: Beginning with those newly eligible for OASDI benefits in 2015 and later, reduce 

PIA formula factors so that benefits grow by inflation rather than by increases in real wages

Expressed as a percentage of taxable payrol Trust Fund 

Ratio 

1-1-year
2066 11.31 12.98 1.66 299

2067 11.22 12.97 1.75 320

2068 11.12 12.97 1.84 343

2069 11.03 12.96 1.93 366

2070 10.94 12.96 2.02 392

2071 10.85 12.95 2.10 419

2072 10.76 12.95 2.19 447

2073 10.68 12.95 2.27 477

2074 10.59 12.94 2.35 508

2075 10.50 12.94 2.43 541

2076 10.42 12.93 2.51 576

2077 10.34 12.93 2.59 612

2078 10.26 12.93 2.67 651

2079 10.18 12.92 2.75 691

2080 10.10 12.92 2.82 732

2081 10.02 12.91 2.90 776

2082 9.94 12.91 2.97 822

2083 9.86 12.91 3.05 869

2084 9.78 12.90 3.12 919

2085 9.70 12.90 3.20 970

Summarized Rates: OASDI

2008 Cost Rate Income Rate

Actuarial 

Balance

-2082 13.21% 13.82% 0.60% 2.30%

Office of the Chief Actuary, Social Security

Estimates based on Intermediate Assumptions of the 2008 Trustees Report

Change in 

Actuarial Balance

July 17, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4072 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4072

  To amend the Truth in Lending Act to empower the States to set the 
     maximum annual percentage rates applicable to consumer credit 
                 transactions, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 7, 2022

Mr. Whitehouse (for himself, Mr. Reed, Ms. Warren, Mr. Merkley, and Mr. 
   Sanders) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Truth in Lending Act to empower the States to set the 
     maximum annual percentage rates applicable to consumer credit 
                 transactions, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Empowering States' Rights To Protect 
Consumers Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. LIMITS ON ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATES.

    Chapter 2 of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1631 et seq.) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 140B. LIMITS ON ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATES.

    ``Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the annual percentage 
rate applicable to any consumer credit transaction (other than a 
residential mortgage transaction), including any fees associated with 
such a transaction, may not exceed the maximum rate permitted by the 
laws of the State in which the consumer resides.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 28 (Thursday, February 11, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 7373]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02797]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLOR936000.L14400000.ET0000.15XL1109AF; HAG 15-0155; OR-50500]

Public Land Order No. 7850; Extension of Public Land Order No. 
7184, Elk River Wild and Scenic Corridor; Oregon

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Public Land Order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This order extends the duration of the withdrawal created by 
Public Land Order No. 7184 for an additional 20-year period, which 
would otherwise expire on February 13, 2016. This extension is 
necessary to continue the protection of the investment of Federal funds 
and recreational and visual resources of the Elk River Wild and Scenic 
Corridor within the Siskiyou National Forest in Oregon.

DATES: This withdrawal extension is effective on February 14, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robin Ligons, Bureau of Land 
Management Oregon/Washington State Office, 503-808-6169, or Candice 
Polisky, U.S. Forest Service, Region 6, Pacific Northwest Regional 
Office, 503-808-2479. Persons who use a telecommunications device for 
the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 
1-800-877-8339 to reach either of the above contacts. The FIRS is 
available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a message or question 
with either of the above individuals. You will receive a reply during 
normal business hours.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose for which the withdrawal was 
first made requires this extension to continue protection of the 
Federal investment of approximately $6.6 million in recreational 
developments and fisheries in the Elk River Wild and Scenic Corridor 
within the Siskiyou National Forest located in Curry County, Oregon.

Order

    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of the Interior 
by Section 204 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, 
43 U.S.C. 1714, it is ordered as follows:
    Public Land Order No. 7184 (61 FR 5719 (1996)), as corrected (61 FR 
24948 (1996)), which withdrew 4,921 acres of National Forest System 
lands from location and entry under the United States mining laws, but 
not from leasing under the mineral leasing laws, to protect the 
significant recreational and visual resources of the Elk River Wild and 
Scenic Corridor, is hereby extended for an additional 20-year period. 
The withdrawal extended by this order will expire on February 13, 2036, 
unless, as a result of a review conducted prior to the expiration date 
pursuant to Section 204(f) of the Federal Land Policy and Management 
Act of 1976 43 U.S.C. 1714, the Secretary determines that the 
withdrawal shall be further extended.

    Dated: January 31, 2016.
Janice M. Schneider,
Assistant Secretary--Land and Minerals Management.
[FR Doc. 2016-02797 Filed 2-10-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-15-P
```
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2326

Reelcraft Industries:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-11516

Darex, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1997, AND THE CONSOLIDATED
 STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                            2,879
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2,938
<ALLOWANCES>                                        464
<INVENTORY>                                       2,844
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  9,895
<PP&E>                                            1,435
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   22,453
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1,523
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                             62
<OTHER-SE>                                       20,868
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     22,453
<SALES>                                          14,446
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 14,446
<CGS>                                             6,894
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     6,894
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (73)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     179
<INCOME-TAX>                                        426
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (247)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (247)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 26, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-1571

Illinois Tool Works:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 47 (Friday, March 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13185]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5933]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Documents Containing Reporting or Recordkeeping Requirements: 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Review

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice of the OMB review of information collection.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has recently submitted to 
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review the following 
proposal for collection of information under the provisions of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    1. Type of submission, new, revision or extension: Revision.
    2. The title of the information collection: Agreement States 
Program as authorized by section 274(b) of the Atomic Energy Act.
    3. The form number is applicable: Not applicable.
    4. How often the collection is required: One time or as needed.
    5. Who will be required or asked to report: 29 States who have 
signed section 274(b) agreements with NRC.
    6. An estimate of the total number of responses: 320.
    7. An estimate of the total number of hours needed annually to 
complete the requirement or request: 1,000 hours (approximately 3 hours 
per response.)
    8. An indication of whether section 3504(h) Pub. L. 96-511 applies: 
Not applicable.
    9. Abstract: There are unique instances in which Agreement States 
must be surveyed on a one-time or as needed basis, i.e., in response to 
a specific incident, to gather information on licensing and inspection 
practices and other technical and statistical information. The results 
of such information requests, which are authorized under section 274(b) 
of the Atomic Energy Act, are utilized by the Commission for preparing 
responses to Congressional inquiries and requests for information from 
other sources.
    Copies of the submittal may be inspected or obtained for a fee from 
the NRC Public Document Room, 2120 L Street, NW. (Lower Level), 
Washington, D.C. 20037.
    Comments and questions should be directed to the OMB reviewer: Troy 
Hillier, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (3150-0029), 
NEOB-10202, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC. 20503.
    Comments may also be communicated by telephone at (202) 395-3084.
    The NRC Clearance Officer is Brenda Jo. Shelton, (301) 415-7233.

    Dated at Rockville, Md., this 2nd day of March, 1995.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Gerald F. Cranford,
Designated Senior Official for Information Resources Management.
[FR Doc. 95-5933 Filed 3-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M