alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3919 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3919

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to provide that an issuer 
 that is required to file certain quarterly reports may elect to file 
                      those reports semiannually.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 24, 2022

  Mr. Tillis introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to provide that an issuer 
 that is required to file certain quarterly reports may elect to file 
                      those reports semiannually.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reporting Requirements Reduction Act 
of 2022''.

SEC. 2. SEMIANNUAL REPORTS.

    Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(s) Issuer Election.--With respect to any report that, under this 
section, or under a rule issued under this section, an issuer is 
required to file on a quarterly basis, the issuer may elect to instead 
file the report on a semiannual basis.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

August 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1558

Illinois Tool Works:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Boardof Directors 

Lincare Holdings Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-148907) on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-145557, 333-116599, 333-98093, 333-74672, 333-78719, 333-71159, 333-46969, 333-39689 and 333-13275) of LincareHoldings Inc. of our reports dated February 25, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Lincare Holdings Inc. as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, and the related financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, whichreports appear in the December 31, 2009 annual report on Form 10-K of Lincare Holdings Inc. 

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidatedfinancial statements, the Company changed its method for measuring and disclosing the fair value of assets and liabilities due to the adoption of new accounting requirements issued by the FASB, effective January 1, 2008. 

As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of valuing certain financial assets and liabilities due tothe fair value option election related to the adoption of new accounting requirements issued by the FASB, effective January 1, 2008. 

Asdiscussed in Notes 1 and 7 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for convertible debt instruments due to the adoption of new accounting requirements issued by the FASB, effective January 1, 2009,applied retrospectively. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Tampa, Florida 

February 25, 2010 

Certified Public Accountants
#### William J. A. Fuller. Respondent, v. Union Electric Manufacturing Company, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by

Daniels, J.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 21

                               SUBSIDIARIES OF
                                THE REGISTRANT


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                    JURISDICTION      PERCENTAGE OF VOTING STOCK
    NAME OF CORPORATION           OF INCORPORATION      OWNED BY SHOLODGE, INC.
    -------------------           ----------------    --------------------------
<S>                                   <C>                       <C>
Two Seventeen, Inc.                   Tennessee                  100%

Shoney's Inns Group IV, Inc.          Tennessee                  100%

MOBAT, Inc.                           Tennessee                  100%

MURJAC, Inc.                          Tennessee                  100%(1)

Shoney's Inn of Lebanon, Inc.         Tennessee                  100%

Shoney's Inn, Inc.                    Tennessee                  100%

Nashville Air Associates, Inc.        Tennessee                  100%

Security Financial Corporation        Tennessee                  100%

Moore and Associates, Inc.            Tennessee                  100%

Virginia Inns, Inc.                   Tennessee                  100%

Airport Inn, Inc.                     Tennessee                  100%

ShoLodge Franchise Systems, Inc.      Tennessee                  100%

Sunshine Inns, Inc.                   Tennessee                  100%

Inn Partners, Inc.                    Tennessee                  100%

LAFLA Inn, Inc.                       Tennessee                  100%

Desert Inns, Inc.                     Tennessee                  100%

Southeast Texas Inns, Inc.            Tennessee                  100%

Clearwater Inn, Inc.                  Tennessee                  100%

Delaware Inns, Inc.                   Tennessee                  100%

Midwest Inns, Inc.                    Tennessee                  100%

Carolina Inns, Inc.                   Tennessee                  100%

Alabama Lodging Corporation           Tennessee                  100%

Far West Inns, Inc.                   Tennessee                  100%

ShoLodge Beverage Corporation           Texas                  100%(2)

Front Range Suites, Inc.              Tennessee                  100%
</TABLE>

(1) Through Shoney's Inns Group IV, Inc.
(2) Through Southeast Texas Inns, Inc.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 37 (Friday, February 24, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Pages 10425-10426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4791]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE BOARD OF GOVERNORS


Notice of Vote to Close Meeting

    By telephone vote on February 14, 1995, a majority of the members 
contacted and voting, the Board of Governors voted to add to the agenda 
of its March 6, 1995, meeting, closed to public observation, 
consideration of new international mail rates and services. (See 60 FR 
9078, February 16, 1995).
    The Board determined that pursuant to section 552b(c)(3) of Title 
5, United States Code, and section 7.3(c) of Title 39, Code of Federal 
Regulations, this portion of the meeting is exempt from the open 
meeting requirement of the Government in the Sunshine Act [5 U.S.C. 
552b(b)] because it is likely to disclose information which is 
specifically exempted from disclosure by section 410(c)(2) of title 39, 
United States Code.
    The Board further determined that the public interest does not 
require that the Board's discussion of these matters be open to the 
public. [[Page 10426]] 
    In accordance with section 552b(f)(1) of Title 5, United States 
Code, and section 7.6(a) of title 39, Code of Federal Regulations, the 
General Counsel of the United States Postal Service has certified that 
in her opinion the meeting may properly be closed to public observation 
pursuant to section 552b(c)(3) of Title 5, and section 410(c)(2) of 
title 39, United States Code; and section 7.3(c) of Title 39, Code of 
Federal Regulations.
    Requests for information about the meeting should be addressed to 
the Secretary of the Board, David F. Harris, at (202) 268-4800.
David F. Harris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-4791 Filed 2-22-95; 2:59 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-M
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 21, 2012

d0514 

# Order

May 21, 2012

144582 & (55)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144582 COA: 301503 Kent CC: 09-013306-FC LEONEL FRANCO-AVINA, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 13, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to
remand is DENIED.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Industrial Enterprises
      of
      America, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to
      such officer’s knowledge, that this Amendment No. 2 to the Company’s quarterly
      report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (this "Amendment
      No. 2”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
      contained in this Amendment No. 2 fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for,
      the
      period presented in this Amendment No. 2.








Date: **September
      18, 2006**


By: /s/
      James W. Margulies


James
      W. Margulies ,
      Chief
      Financial Officer














The
      foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350 and is not being filed as part of this Amendment No. 2 or as a separate
      disclosure document.
#### STATE v. JOHN E. ELLIS.

(Filed 20 May, 1936.)

Constitutional Law F d: Criminal Law L f—

Upon defendant’s appeal from judgment and sentence by the court after defendant had entered a conditional plea of guilty under ch. 23, Public Laws of 1933, the case will be remanded in order that a jury may pass upon defendant’s guilt or innocence in accordance with defendant’s constitutional right.

Appeal by defendant from *Williams, J.,*at November Term, 1935, of New HaNOveb.

Criminal prosecution, tried upon warrant charging the defendant with violations of the prohibition law.

From a conviction in the recorder’s court of New Hanover County and sentence of sixty days on the roads, the defendant appealed to the Superior Court, where he tendered a “conditional plea of guilty” under ch. 23, Public Laws 1933, which was accepted by the solicitor.

Upon hearing the evidence, without the intervention of a jury, the court adjudged the defendant “guilty” and sentenced him to two years on the roads.

Defendant appeals, assigning errors.

*Attorney-General Seawall and Assistant Attorney-General McMullan for the State.*

*W. F. Jones for defendant.*

Stacy, C. J.

It is conceded in the State’s brief a new trial must be awarded under authority of *S. v. Camby,*209 N. C., 50, to the end that a jury may pass upon the guilt or innocence of the accused, as is his constitutional right. It is so ordered. *S. v. Hill,*209 N. C., 53.

New trial.
<PAGE>






                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of Metretek Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, A. Bradley Gabbard, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and result of
               operations of the Company.



                                        /s/  A. Bradley Gabbard
                                        ------------------------------------


                                        A. Bradley Gabbard
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        March 28, 2003


                                       1
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-49758, 333-85744, 333-07541, 333-85131, 333-65812, 333-84356, 333-102185, 333-112815 and 333-131703) and Forms S-3 (Nos. 333-69999, 333-53484 and 333-98475) of Abaxis, Inc. of our reports dated June 13, 2006 relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of Abaxis, Inc. as of March 31, 2006 and for the year then ended, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2006 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2006, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

| /s/ Burr,   Pilger & Mayer LLP |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|
|                                    |   |
| Palo Alto,   California            |   |
|                               |   |
| June 13,   2006                    |   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                    203,576
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                             9,304,441
<ALLOWANCES>                              149,313
<INVENTORY>                               214,386
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          13,080,674
<PP&E>                                    53,209,217
<DEPRECIATION>                            17,628,236
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            48,661,655
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     46,509,600
<BONDS>                                   0
<COMMON>                                  18,537
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                2,133,518
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              48,661,655
<SALES>                                   78,342,026
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          78,342,026
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          83,125,060
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          92,383
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        3,858,791
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (8,734,208)
<INCOME-TAX>                              (1,838,665)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (6,895,543)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 31,442
<NET-INCOME>                              (6,926,985)
<EPS-BASIC>                             (3.89)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (3.89)


</TABLE>
#### VIRGINIA TRUST COMPANY, E. H. MEADOWS and MRS. JULIA B. JONES v. E. M. GREEN, Receiver of FORT TOTTEN, Incorporated, JOHN A. GUION, Trustee, CRAVEN COUNTY and NATIONAL HOLDING COMPANY.

(Filed 15 March, 1933.)

Appeal by plaintiffs from *Harris, J.,*at November Term, 1932, of CeaveN.

Affirmed.

This action was heard on the motion of the defendants other than John A. Guión, trustee, that the action be consolidated for trial with an action entitled “Craven County *v.*National Holding Company and *781others/’ now pending in the Superior Court of Craven County, and that- the consolidated action be referred for trial.

From order allowing the motion to consolidate and referring the consolidated action to a referee, for trial, plaintiffs appealed to the Supreme Court.

*E. M. Long and W. B. R. Guión for plaintiffs.*

*Moore & Dunn and Warren & Warren for defendants.*

Pee Oueiam.

There was no error in the order consolidating this action with another action pending in the Superior Court of Craven County. In *Fleming v. Holleman,*190 N. C., 449, 130 S. E., 171, it is said: “The object of consolidating two or more actions is to avoid a multiplicity of suits, to guard against oppression and abuse, to prevent delay, and especially to save unnecessary cost and expense; in short the attainment of justice with the least expense and vexation to the parties litigant. Consolidation, however, is improper, when the conduct of the cause will be embarrassed, or complications or prejudice will result, which will injuriously affect the rights of the parties.” In the instant case, the order of consolidation is supported by this principle.

An examination of the pleadings in this and in the action with which it was consolidated shows that there was no error in the order of reference. C. S., 573, subsection 5. The relief sought in both actions is equitable in its nature.

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies                           ( print page 8072)                        owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than March 11, 2016.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacquelyn K. Brunmeier, Assistant Vice President) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291:

                    1.                     *Mackinac Financial Corporation,*                     Manistique, Michigan; to acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of The First National Bank of Eagle River, Eagle River, Wisconsin.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 11, 2016.

Michael J. Lewandowski,

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2016-03168 Filed 2-16-16; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




         In connection with the annual report of SpatiaLight, Inc.. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2001 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert A. Olins, Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer, certify,
to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

                                              /s/ Robert A. Olins
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Robert A. Olins
                                              Principal Executive, Financial and
                                              Accounting Officer
                                              SpatiaLight, Inc.
                                              September 19, 2002