alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 27 (Thursday, February 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7760-7761]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3200]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket Nos. GT95-13-000 and GT95-13-001]


Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.; Notice of Refund Report

February 3, 1995.
    Take notice that on December 22, 1994, Columbia Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Columbia), tendered for filing a refund report for the 
lump sum refunds in the amount of $5,457,136.00 made by Columbia on 
September 23, 1994, to disburse refunds received from Texas Eastern 
Transmission Corporation attributable to rates charged under Docket 
Nos. RP91-72, et al.
    On January 30, 1995, Columbia tendered for filing a supplemental 
refund report in Docket No. GT95-13-001. Columbia states that this 
filing is being tendered to report to the Commission, and to all 
parties in this docket, additional information about the refund.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules 
and Practice and Procedure. All such motions or protests should be 
filed on or before February 10, 1995. Protests will be considered by 
the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but 
will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. 
[[Page 7761]] Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion 
to intervene. Copies of Columbia's filings are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-3200 Filed 2-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 13

- 00419

- CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS

v. SHARON HINOJOSA
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No 4 of Nueces County , Texas

Trial Cause No. 12

- CR

- 2765

- 4

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. April 30, 2015
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that (1) this
Quarterly Report of MSX International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the fiscal period ended July 4, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Robert Netolicka
Robert Netolicka
Chief Executive Officer
August 9, 2004 /s/ Frederick K. Minturn
Frederick K. Minturn
Chief Financial Officer
August 9, 2004 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to MSX International, Inc. and will be retained by MSX International,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 21 - - Subsidiaries of the Registrant



               As of September 23, 1999, SBS Technologies, Inc. has the
               following subsidiaries:

               Name                                    State of Incorporation
               ----                                    ----------------------

               SBS Technologies, Inc., Telemetry and
                    Communications Products            California, USA

               SBS Technologies, Inc., Modular I/O     California, USA

               SBS Technologies, Inc., Embedded
                    Computers                          New Mexico, USA

               SBS Technologies, Inc., Connectivity
                    Products                           Minnesota, USA

               SBS Technologies, Inc., Industrial
                    Computers                          California, USA

               SBS Technologies, Inc., Embedded
                    PPC Products                       California, USA

               SBS Technologies, Inc., Foreign
                    Holding Company                    Nevada, USA

               SBS Technologies Holding GmbH           Germany

               ORTEC Electronic Assembly GmbH          Germany

               SBS OR Computers Verwaltungs GmbH       Germany

               SBS Technologies Europe GmbH            Germany

               SBS OR Industrial Computers
                    GmbH & Co. KG                      Germany
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-1463 

_____________________________

WILLIAM DAVID HURST,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Jennie Kinsey, Judge.

July 29, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, M.K. THOMAS, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

William David Hurst, pro se, Appellant.

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Lori A. Willner, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
RULE 13a-14(b) OR 15d-14(b) AND
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Exchange Act; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respect, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: May 13, 2008
    By:
    /s/ Stephen NagelPresident and Chief Financial Officer
S. 3773 

One Hundred Seventeenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty two 

An Act 

To authorize leases of up to 99 years for land held in trust for the Confederated 

Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE CHEHALIS RESERVATION 

LEASING AUTHORITY. 

Subsection (a) of the first section of the Act of August 9, 

1955 (69 Stat. 539, chapter 615; 25 U.S.C. 415(a)), is amended, 

in the second sentence, by inserting ‘‘, land held in trust for the 

Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation’’ after ‘‘Crow Tribe 

of Montana’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3852 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3852

 To reauthorize the Erie Canalway National Heritage Corridor, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 16, 2022

Mrs. Gillibrand (for herself and Mr. Schumer) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To reauthorize the Erie Canalway National Heritage Corridor, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Erie Canalway National Heritage 
Reauthorization Act''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE ERIE CANALWAY NATIONAL HERITAGE 
              CORRIDOR.

    (a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 810(a)(1) of the Erie 
Canalway National Heritage Corridor Act (54 U.S.C. 320101 note; Public 
Law 106-554; 114 Stat. 2763A-303; 131 Stat. 461; 133 Stat. 2714), as 
amended by section 119(m) of division G of the Consolidated 
Appropriations Act, 2022, is amended by striking ``$16,000,000'' and 
inserting ``$18,000,000''.
    (b) Reauthorization.--Section 811 of the Erie Canalway National 
Heritage Corridor Act (54 U.S.C. 320101 note; Public Law 106-554; 114 
Stat. 2763A-295; 128 Stat. 3802), as amended by section 119(j) of 
division G of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022, is amended by 
striking ``2023'' and inserting ``2037''.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 18.1

November 13, 2002

Interstate Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
1010 Wisconsin Avenue, N.W.
Suite 650
Washington, D.C. 20007

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We have been furnished with a copy of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of
Interstate Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (the Company) for the three months ended
September 30, 2002, and have read the Companys statements contained in Note 2
to the condensed consolidated financial statements included therein. As stated
in Note 2, the Company changed its method of accounting for incentive
management fees during interim periods and states that the newly adopted
accounting principle is preferable in the circumstances because the new method
eliminates the potential that incentive management fee revenue will be
recognized in one interim reporting period and reduced or eliminated in a future interim
reporting period. In accordance with your request, we have reviewed and
discussed with Company officials the circumstances and business judgment and
planning upon which the decision to make this change in the method of
accounting was based.

We have not audited any financial statements of the Company as of any date or
for any period, nor have we audited the information set forth in the
aforementioned Note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial statements;
accordingly, we do not express an opinion concerning the factual information
contained therein.

With regard to the aforementioned accounting change, the pertinent accounting
literature in EITF Topic D-96 states that the newly adopted
accounting principle is preferable in the circumstances.

Based on our review and discussion, with reliance on managements business
judgment and planning, we concur that the newly adopted method of accounting is
preferable in the Companys circumstances.

Very truly yours,

KPMG LLP
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 42 (Friday, March 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12030-12031]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5269]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

Information Collection Under OMB Review: Wood Destroying Insect 
Information--Existing Construction, VA Form 26-8850

AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Veterans Affairs has submitted to OMB the 
following proposal for the collection of information under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). This 
document lists the following information: (1) The title of the 
information collection, and the Department form number(s), if 
applicable; (2) a description of the need and its use; (3) who will be 
required or asked to respond; (4) an estimate of the total annual 
reporting hours, and recordkeeping burden, if applicable; (5) the 
estimated average burden hours per respondent; (6) the frequency of 
response; and (7) an estimated number of respondents.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the proposed information collection and supporting 
documents may be obtained from Trish Fineran, Veterans Benefits 
Administration (20M30), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont 
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20420, (202) 273-6886.
    Comments and questions about the items on the list should be 
directed to VA's OMB Desk Officer, Joseph Lackey, NEOB, Room 3002, 
Washington, DC 20503, (202) 395-7316. Do not send requests for benefits 
to this address.

[[Page 12031]] DATES: Comments on the information collection should be 
directed to the OMB Desk Officer within 30 days of this notice.

    Dated: February 21, 1995.

    By direction of the Secretary.
Ronald C. Taylor,
Management Analyst.

Reinstatement

    1. Wood Destroying Insect Information--Existing Construction, VA 
Form 26-8850.
    2. The form is completed by pest control operators to report the 
presence, if any, of wood destroying insects and any resulting 
damage to properties proposed for guaranteed financing. The 
information is used to determine whether the property is acceptable 
and the effect, if any, the damage may have on the reasonable value 
of the property.
    3. Individuals or households--Business or other for-profit.
    4. The estimated burden hour per year is 87,651. However, because 
the requirement for wood destroying insect inspections is common 
practice in the housing industry, only 1 hour is being reported for 
this information collection.
    5. 20 minutes.
    6. On occasion.
    7. 262,953 respondents.

[FR Doc. 95-5269 Filed 3-2-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of American Superconductor Corporation (the
Company) for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, David A. Henry, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/S/    DAVID A.
HENRY  
|David A. Henry         
|Chief Financial Officer

May 28, 2009
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable) | Description of Proposed Provision:      Apply the following payroll tax rate applies above the current-law taxable maximum, with no credit toward benefits:  2.0 percent in 2012 and 3.0 percent in 2060. |
|-------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                           |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2009 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified January 28, 2010 |
Dismiss and Opinion Filed August 28 , 2024

In The



### Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 24

- 00805

- CV

BOBBIE SUE HAYES , Appellant

V.

DAVID LEE WALTERS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Court

Grayson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. FA

- 23

- 0058

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Molberg, Nowell, and Kennedy

Opinion by Justice Nowell

On July 29, 2024, after receiving a copy of the trial court’s o rder vacating the

appealed order o n motion for appointment of receiver, we informed the parties th at

it appeared the appeal had become moot and was subject to dismissal for want of

jurisdiction unless , within ten days, appellant showed cause as to why the appeal

s hould not be dismissed. See City of Dallas v. Woodfield , 305 S.W.3d 412, 416

(Tex. App.

— Dallas 2010, no pet.). To date, appellant has not responded.– 2

–

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42. 3(a); Woodfield, 305

S.W. 3d at 416.

240805f.p05 /Erin A. Nowell/ /

ERIN A. NOWELL

JUSTICE– 3

– 

### Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

BOBBIE SUE HAYES, Appellant

No. 05

- 24

- 00805

- CV V.

DAVID LEE WALTERS, Appellee On Appeal from the 59th Judicial

District Court, Grayson County,

Texas

Trial Court Cause No. FA

- 23

- 0058.

Opinion delivered by Justice Nowell,

Justices Molberg and Kennedy

participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

We ORDER that appellee David Lee Walters recover his costs, if any, of this

appeal from appellant Bobbie Sue Hayes.

Judgment entered this 28 th day of August

, 2024.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3744 

To amend the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 to reauthorize 

and modify the boundary of the Baltimore National Heritage Area, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 3, 2022 

Mr. CARDIN (for himself and Mr. VAN HOLLEN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 

2009 to reauthorize and modify the boundary of the 

Baltimore National Heritage Area, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Baltimore National 

5 Heritage Area Reauthorization Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. BOUNDARY MODIFICATION AND REAUTHORIZATION 

7 OF BALTIMORE NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA. 

8 (a) BOUNDARY MODIFICATION.— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3744 IS

1 (1) MAP.—Section 8005(a)(4) of the Omnibus 

2 Public Land Management Act of 2009 (54 U.S.C. 

3 320101 note; Public Law 111–11; 123 Stat. 1247) 

4 is amended by striking ‘‘entitled’’ and all that fol5 lows through the period at the end and inserting 

6 ‘‘entitled ‘Baltimore National Heritage Area Pro7 posed Boundary’, numbered T10/179,623, and dated 

8 February 2022.’’. 

9 (2) BOUNDARIES.—Section 8005(b)(2)(A) of 

10 the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 

11 (54 U.S.C. 320101 note; Public Law 111–11; 123 

12 Stat. 1247) is amended by striking ‘‘October 2001’’ 

13 and all that follows through the period at the end 

14 and inserting ‘‘July 2020.’’. 

15 (b) REAUTHORIZATION.—Section 8005(i) of the Om16 nibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 (54 U.S.C. 

17 320101 note; Public Law 111–11; 123 Stat. 1253; 130 

18 Stat. 1491) is amended by striking ‘‘the date that is 15 

19 years after the date of enactment of this Act’’ and insert20 ing ‘‘March 30, 2036’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 3.1.1
 SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
 OF
 STANDARD PARKING CORPORATION
 DGCL
 Corporation
  Certificate
  Article I
 Name of Corporation
  Article II
 Registered Office and Registered Agent
 Article III
 Nature of Business
  Article IV
 Authorized Capital Stock Common Stock Preferred Stock Voting Stock




---



##### 



Common Stock Certificate of Incorporation
 Voting Rights
 Dividends and Distributions
 No Preemptive Rights
 No Redemption Rights
 Preferred Stock
 Designation Series
D Stock
 Rank Junior Securities




---



##### 



Dividends
 Dividend Payment Date




---



##### 



Liquidation Preference
 Liquidation Amount




---



##### 



Redemption
 Optional
 Optional Redemption Redemption Price
 Change of Control Redemption provided
 Redemption Prohibitions
  9-1/4% Notes




---



##### 



Credit Agreement
 New Notes
 Allocation
 Procedure for Redemption




---



##### 



Voting Rights
    Article V
 Board of Directors
 Increase or Decrease in Board of Directors
 Vacancies in the Board Bylaws
 Removal of Directors
 Written Ballot
 Approval of Related Party Transactions Related party transaction




---



##### 



Article VI
 Stockholder Action by Written Consent
 Calling of Special Meeting of Stockholders
 Business at Special Meeting of
Stockholders
 Notice of Stockholder Proposals
 Article VII
 Amendment or Modification of Bylaws
 Article VIII
 Limitation of Directors Liability
 Article IX
 Right to Indemnification Section 145 Covered Person Covered Matter
 Authorization of Indemnification




---



##### 



Advancement of Expenses
 Non-exclusive Rights
 Amendment or Repeal of Article IX
   Standard Parking CorporationBy:
    /s/ James A. WilhelmName:
    James A. WilhelmTitle:
    President and Chief Executive Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 14

- 00103

- CR

Melvin MARTIN

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR3537

Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED April 1, 2015.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice