9544 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 33 / Friday, February 17, 1995 / Notices

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND

URBAN DEVELOPMENT

Office of the Assistant Secretary for

Housing—Federal Housing

Commissioner

[Docket No. N–95–3869; FR–3858–N–01]

Federally Assisted Low Income

Housing Drug Elimination Grants;

Notice of Funding Availability—FY

1995

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant

Secretary for Housing—Federal Housing

Commissioner, HUD.

ACTION: Notice of funding availability

(NOFA) for fiscal year (FY) 1995.

SUMMARY: This NOFA announces HUD’s

FY 1995 funding of $17,800,737 for

Federally Assisted Low Income Housing

Drug Elimination Grants. The purposes

of the Assisted Housing Drug

Elimination Program are to eliminate

drug-related crime and related problems

in and around the premises of federally

assisted low income housing, and to

make available grants to help owners of

such housing carry out plans to address

these issues. This document describes

the purpose of the NOFA, applicant

eligibility, available amounts, selection

criteria, financial requirements,

management, and application

processing, including how to apply,

how selections will be made, and how

applicants will be notified of results.

DATES: No applications will be accepted

after 4:00 p.m. (local time) by the local

HUD Office on April 18, 1995. This

application deadline is firm as to date

and hour. In the interest of fairness to

all competing applicants, HUD will treat

as ineligible for consideration any

application that is received after the

deadline. Applicants should take this

practice into account and make early

submission of their materials to avoid

any risk of loss of eligibility brought

about by unanticipated delays or other

delivery-related problems. A ‘‘FAX’’

will not constitute delivery.

ADDRESSES: (a) Application form: An

application form may be obtained from

the local HUD Office having jurisdiction

over the location of the applicant

project. The HUD Office will be

available to provide technical assistance

on the preparation of applications

during the application period. In

addition, applications may be obtained

from the Multifamily Housing

Clearinghouse by calling 1–800–685–

8470; or for hearing- or speech-impaired

persons (202) 708–4594 (TDD). (The

TDD number is not a toll-free number.)

(b) Application submission:

Applications (original and one copy)

must be received by the deadline at the

appropriate HUD Office with

jurisdiction over the applicant project,

Attention: Director of Multifamily

Housing. It is not sufficient for the

application to bear a postage date within

the submission time period.

Applications submitted by facsimile are

not acceptable. Applications received

after the deadline will not be

considered.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For

application material and project-specific

guidance, please contact the Office of

the Director of Multifamily Housing in

the HUD Office having jurisdiction over

the project(s) in question. A list of HUD

Offices is attached to this NOFA.

For other information, contact Lessley

Wiles, Office of Multifamily Housing

Management, Department of Housing

and Urban Development, Room 6176,

451 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,

DC 20410. Telephone (202) 708–2654,

Ext. 2618. TDD number (202) 708–4594.

(These are not toll-free numbers.)

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Paperwork Reduction Act Statement

The information collection

requirements contained in this NOFA

have been approved by the Office of

Management and Budget, under section

3504(h) of the Paperwork Reduction Act

of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), and

assigned OMB control number 2502–

0476.

I. Purpose and Substantive Description

(a) Authority

These grants are authorized under

Chapter 2, Subtitle C, Title V of the

Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 (42 U.S.C.

11901 et seq.), as amended by section

581 of the National Affordable Housing

Act of 1990 (NAHA) (Pub. L. 101–625,

approved November 28, 1990) and

section 161 of the Housing and

Community Development Act of 1992

(HCDA 1992) (Pub. L. 102–550,

approved October 28, 1992).

Note: This NOFA does NOT apply to the

funding available under the statute for Public

and Indian Housing.

(b) Allocation Amounts

(1) Federal Fiscal Year 1995 Funding

The amount available for funding

under this Notice of Funding

Availability (NOFA) is $17,800,737.

Section 581 of NAHA expanded the

Drug Elimination Program to include

federally assisted low-income housing.

The Departments of Veterans Affairs

and Housing and Urban Development,

and Independent Agencies

Appropriations Act of 1995, (Pub. L.

103–327, approved September 28, 1994)

appropriated $290 million for the Drug

Elimination Program, and made not

more than $17,406,250 of the total Drug

Elimination Program appropriation

available for federally assisted lowincome housing. The additional

$394,487 represent funds available from

recaptured and carry-over funds from

prior year appropriations for the

Federally Assisted Low-Income Housing

Drug Elimination Grant Program.

Of the total $290 million

appropriated, $247,168,750 will fund

the Public and Indian Housing Drug

Elimination Program; $13,925,000 will

fund the Youth Sports Program; $10

million will fund drug elimination

technical assistance and training; and

$1.5 million will fund drug information

clearinghouse services. The remaining

$17,406,250 plus the $394,487 is being

made available under this NOFA.

HUD is allocating grant funds under

this NOFA to four ‘‘Award Offices’’ on

the basis of a formula allocation. This

formula allocation reflects the number

of eligible federally assisted low-income

housing units in specific geographic

areas and the level of drug-related crime

within each area, according to statistics

compiled by the U.S. Department of

Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation

(‘‘Uniform Crime Reports for Drug

Abuse Violations—1990’’).

(2) Maximum Grant Award Amounts

The maximum grant award amount is

limited to $125,000 per project.

(3) Reallocation

Any grant funds under this NOFA

that are allocated, but that are not

reserved for grantees, must be released

to HUD Headquarters for reallocation.

HUD reserves the right to fund portions

of full applications. If the HUD Award

Office determines that an application

cannot be partially funded and there are

insufficient funds to fund the

application fully, any remaining funds

after all other applications have been

selected will be released to HUD

Headquarters for reallocation. Amounts

that may become available due to

deobligation will also be reallocated to

Headquarters.

All reallocated funds will be awarded

in the following manner: HUD Award

Offices will submit to Headquarters a

list of applications, with their scores

and amount of funding requested, that

would have been funded had there been

sufficient funds in the appropriate

allocation to do so. Headquarters will

select applications from those submitted

by the HUD Award Offices, using a

random number lottery overseen by the

Offices of Housing, General Counsel,
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 33 / Friday, February 17, 1995 / Notices 9545

and Inspector General, and make awards

from any available reallocated funds.

(4) Reduction of Requested Grant

Amounts

HUD may award an amount less than

requested if:

(i) HUD determines the amount

requested for an eligible activity is

unreasonable;

(ii) Insufficient amounts remain under

the allocation to fund the full amount

requested by the applicant and HUD

determines that partial funding is a

viable option;

(iii) HUD determines that some

elements of the proposed plan are

suitable for funding and others are not;

or

(iv) For any other reason where good

cause exists.

(5) Distribution of Funds

In past years, funds under this

program were allocated to the ten HUD

Regional Offices. Due to HUD’s

reorganization, those offices no longer

exist. Therefore, this year HUD is

allocating funds to four Award Offices,

which will receive the scores from each

HUD Office that has received, rated,

ranked, and scored its applications.

Those Award Offices will, in turn,

request funding for the properties with

the highest score from each HUD Office.

If sufficient funds remain, the next

highest scored applications, regardless

of HUD Office, will be awarded funds.

HUD is allocating grant funds under this

NOFA to the four Award Offices, in

accordance with the following schedule:

Award office States covered Allocation

Buffalo ......... Maine .............. $4,414,583

New Hampshire.

Vermont.

Massachusetts.

Connecticut.

Rhode Island.

New York.

New Jersey.

Pennsylvania.

Delaware.

Maryland.

District of Columbia.

West Virginia.

Virginia.

Knoxville ...... Kentucky ......... 4,467,985

Tennessee.

North Carolina.

South Carolina.

Georgia.

Alabama.

Puerto Rico.

Mississippi.

Florida.

Iowa.

Kansas.

Missouri.

Award office States covered Allocation

Nebraska.

Minneapolis . Illinois .............. 4,343,380

Indiana.

Minnesota.

Wisconsin.

Michigan.

Ohio.

Little Rock ... Arkansas ......... 4,574,789

Louisiana.

New Mexico.

Oklahoma.

Texas.

Colorado.

Montana.

North Dakota.

South Dakota.

Utah.

Wyoming.

Arizona.

California.

Hawaii.

Nevada.

Alaska.

Idaho.

Oregon.

Washington.

(c) Eligibility

The following is a listing of eligible

activities, ineligible activities, eligible

applicants, and general grant

requirements under this NOFA.

(1) Eligible Activities

Please note that the maximum term of

the grant is 12 months.

It is the goal and intent of the

Federally Assisted Low-Income Housing

Drug Elimination Grant Program to

foster a sense of community in dealing

with the issues of drug-related criminal

activity. Programs that foster

interrelationships between the

residents, the housing owner and

management, the local law enforcement

agencies, and other community groups

impacting on the housing are greatly

desired and encouraged. Resident

participation in the determination of

programs and activities to be

undertaken is critical to the success of

all aspects of the program. Working

jointly with community groups, the

neighborhood law enforcement precinct,

residents of adjacent properties, and the

community as a whole can enhance and

magnify the effect of specific program

activities and should be the goal of all

applicants.

(i) Physical Improvements to Enhance

Security. Physical improvements that

are specifically designed to enhance

security are eligible for funding under

this program. The improvements may

include (but are not limited to) systems

designed to limit building access to

project residents, the installation of

barriers, lighting systems, fences, bolts,

and locks; the landscaping or

reconfiguration of common areas to

discourage drug-related crime; and other

physical improvements designed to

enhance security and discourage drugrelated activities. In particular, HUD is

seeking plans that provide successful,

proven, and cost effective deterrents to

drug-related crime that are designed to

address the realities of low-income

assisted housing environments. All

physical improvements must also be

accessible to persons with disabilities.

For example, some types of locks or

buzzer systems are not accessible to

persons with limited strength or

mobility, or to persons who are hearingimpaired. All physical improvements

must meet the accessibility

requirements of 24 CFR part 8.

(ii) Programs to Reduce the use of

Drugs. Programs designed to reduce the

use of drugs in and around federally

assisted low-income housing projects,

including drug abuse prevention,

intervention, referral, and treatment

programs, are eligible for funding under

this program. The program should

facilitate drug prevention, intervention,

and treatment efforts, to include

outreach to community resources and

youth activities, and facilitate bringing

these resources onto the premises, or

provide resident referrals to treatment

programs or transportation to outpatient treatment programs away from

the premises. Funding is permitted for

reasonable, necessary, and justified

leasing of vehicles for resident youth

and adult education and training

activities directly related to ‘‘Programs

to reduce the use of drugs’’ under this

section. Alcohol-related activities/

programs are not eligible for funding

under this NOFA.

(A) Drug Prevention. Drug prevention

programs that will be considered for

funding under this NOFA must provide

a comprehensive drug prevention

approach for residents that will address

the individual resident and his or her

relationship to family, peers, and the

community. Prevention programs must

include activities designed to identify

and change the factors present in

federally assisted low-income housing

that lead to drug-related problems, and

thereby lower the risk of drug usage.

Many components of a comprehensive

approach, such as refusal and restraint

skills, training programs, or drug-related

family counseling, may already be

available in the community of the

applicant’s housing projects, and the

applicant must act to bring those

available program components onto the

premises. Activities that should be

included in these programs are:

(1) Drug Education Opportunities for

Residents. The causes and effects of
9546 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 33 / Friday, February 17, 1995 / Notices

illegal drug usage must be discussed in

a formal setting to provide both young

people and adults the working

knowledge and skills they need to make

informed decisions to confront the

potential and immediate dangers of

illegal drugs. Grantees may contract (in

accordance with 24 CFR part 85.36)

with drug education professionals to

provide appropriate training or

workshops. The drug education

professionals contracted to provide

these services shall be required to base

their services upon the program plan of

the grantee. These educational

opportunities may be a part of resident

meetings, youth activities, or other

gatherings of residents.

(2) Family and Other Support

Services. Drug prevention programs

must demonstrate that they will provide

directly or otherwise make available

services designed to distribute drug

education information, to foster

effective parenting skills, and to provide

referrals for treatment and other

available support services in the project

or the community for federally-assisted

low-income housing families.

(3) Youth Services. Drug prevention

programs must demonstrate that they

have included groups composed of

young people as a part of their

prevention programs. These groups

must be coordinated by adults with the

active participation of youth to organize

youth leadership, sports, recreational,

cultural, and other activities involving

housing youth. The dissemination of

drug education information, the

development of peer leadership skills,

and other drug prevention activities

must be a component of youth services.

Activities or services funded under this

program may not also be funded under

the Youth Sports Program.

(4) Economic/Educational

Opportunities for Residents and Youth.

Drug prevention programs should

demonstrate a capacity to provide

residents the opportunity for referral to

established higher education or

vocational institutions with the goal of

developing or building on the residents’

skills to pursue educational, vocational,

and economic goals. The program must

also demonstrate the ability to provide

residents the opportunity to interact

with private sector businesses in their

immediate community for the same

desired goals.

(B) Intervention. The aim of

intervention is to identify federally

assisted low-income housing resident

drug users and assist them in modifying

their behavior and in obtaining early

treatment, if necessary. The applicant

must establish a program with the goal

of preventing drug problems from

continuing once detected.

(C) Drug Treatment. (1) Treatment

funded under this program shall be in

or around the premises of the federally

assisted low-income housing projects

proposed for funding.

(2) Funds awarded under this

program shall be targeted towards the

development and implementation of

new drug referral treatment services

and/or aftercare, or the improvement or

expansion of such program services for

residents.

(3) Each proposed drug treatment

program should address the following

goals:

(i) Increase resident accessibility to

drug treatment services;

(ii) Decrease criminal activity in and

around federally assisted low-income

housing projects by reducing illicit drug

use among residents; and

(iii) Provide services designed for

youth and/or maternal drug abusers

(e.g., prenatal/postpartum care,

specialized counseling in women’s

issues, parenting classes, or other drug

supportive services).

(4) Approaches that have proven

effective with similar populations will

be considered for funding. Programs

should meet the following criteria:

(i) Applicants may provide the service

of formal referral arrangements to other

treatment programs not in or around the

project when the resident is able to

obtain treatment costs from sources

other than this program. Applicants may

also provide transportation for residents

to out-patient treatment and/or support

programs.

(ii) Provide family/collateral

counseling.

(iii) Provide linkages to educational/

vocational counseling.

(iv) Provide coordination of services

to appropriate local drug agencies, HIVrelated service agencies, and mental

health and public health programs.

(v) Applicants must demonstrate a

working partnership with the Single

State Agency or State license provider

or authority with drug program

coordination responsibilities to

coordinate, develop, and implement the

drug treatment proposal. In particular,

applicants must review and determine

with the Single State Agency or State

license provider or authority with drug

program coordination responsibilities

whether:

(A) The drug treatment provider(s)

has provided drug treatment services to

similar populations, identified in the

application, for two prior years; and

(B) The drug treatment proposal is

consistent with the State treatment plan

and the treatment service meets all State

licensing requirements.

(vi) Funding is not permitted for

treatment of residents at any in-patient

medical treatment programs/facilities.

(vii) Funding is not permitted for

detoxification procedures, short term or

long term, designed to reduce or

eliminate the presence of toxic

substances in the body tissues of a

patient.

(viii) Funding is not permitted for

maintenance drug programs.

Maintenance drugs are medications that

are prescribed regularly for a long

period of supportive therapy (e.g.,

methadone maintenance), rather than

for immediate control of a disorder.

(iii) Resident Councils (RCs).

Providing funding to resident councils

to strengthen their role in developing

programs of eligible activities involving

site residents is eligible for funding

under this program.

(2) Ineligible Activities. Funding is not

permitted for any activities listed below:

(i) Any activity or improvement that

is normally funded from project

operating revenues for routine

maintenance or repairs, or those

activities or improvements that may be

funded through reasonable and

affordable rent increases;

(ii) The acquisition of real property or

physical improvements that involve the

demolition of any units in the project or

displacement of tenants.

(iii) Costs incurred prior to the

effective date of the grant agreement,

including, but not limited to, consultant

fees for surveys related to the

application or its preparation;

(iv) Reimbursement of local law

enforcement agencies for additional

security and protective services;

(v) The employment of one or more

individuals:

(A) To investigate drug-related crime

on or about the real property comprising

any federally assisted low-income

project; and

(B) To provide evidence relating to

such crime in any administrative or

judicial proceeding;

(vi) The provision of training,

communications equipment, and other

related equipment for use by voluntary

tenant patrols acting in cooperation

with local law enforcement officials.

(3) Eligible Applicants. The applicant

must be the owner of a federally assisted

low-income housing project under:

(i) Section 221(d)(3), section 221(d)(4)

or 236 of the National Housing Act.

(Note, however, that only section

221(d)(4) and section 221(d)(3) market

rate projects with project-based

assistance contracts are considered

federally assisted low-income housing.
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 33 / Friday, February 17, 1995 / Notices 9547

Therefore, section 221(d)(4) and section

221(d)(3) market rate projects with

tenant-based assistance contracts are not

considered federally assisted lowincome housing and are not eligible for

funding.)

(ii) Section 101 of the Housing and

Urban Development Act of 1965; or

(iii) Section 8 of the United States

Housing Act of 1937.

(4) General Grant Requirements. The

following requirements apply to all

activities, programs, or functions used

to plan, budget, and evaluate the work

funded under this program.

(i) After applications have been

ranked and selected, HUD and the

applicant shall enter into a grant

agreement setting forth the amount of

the grant, the physical improvements or

other eligible activities to be

undertaken, financial controls, and

special conditions, including sanctions

for violation of the agreement.

(ii) The policies, guidelines, and

requirements of this NOFA, 48 CFR part

31, other applicable OMB cost

principles, HUD program regulations,

HUD Handbooks, and the terms of

grant/special conditions and subgrant

agreements apply to the acceptance and

use of assistance by grantees and will be

followed in determining the

reasonableness and allocability of costs.

All costs must be reasonable and

necessary.

(iii) The term of funded activities may

not exceed 12 months.

(iv) Owners must ensure that any

funds received under this program are

not commingled with other HUD or

project operating funds.

(v) To avoid duplicate funding,

owners must establish controls to assure

that any funds from other sources, such

as Reserve for Replacement or Rent

Increases, are not used to fund the

physical improvements to be

undertaken under this program.

(vi) Employment preference. A

grantee under this program shall give

preference to the employment of

residents, and comply with section 3 of

the Housing and Urban Development

Act of 1968 and 24 CFR part 135, to

carry out any of the eligible activities

under this part, so long as such

residents have qualifications and

training comparable to nonresident

applicants.

(vii) Termination of funding. HUD

may terminate funding if the grantee

fails to undertake the approved program

activities on a timely basis in

accordance with the grant agreement,

adhere to grant agreement requirements

or special conditions, or submit timely

and accurate reports.

(viii) Subgrants (subcontracting).

(A) A grantee may directly undertake

any of the eligible activities under this

NOFA or it may contract with a

qualified third party, including

incorporated Resident Councils (RCs).

Resident groups that are not

incorporated RCs may share with the

grantee in the implementation of the

program, but may not receive funds as

subgrantees.

(B) Subgrants or cash contributions to

incorporated RCs may be made only

under a written agreement executed

between the grantee and the RC. The

agreement must include a program

budget that is acceptable to the grantee

and that is otherwise consistent with the

grant application budget. The agreement

must obligate the incorporated RC to

permit the grantee to inspect and audit

the RC financial records related to the

agreement, and to account to the grantee

on the use of grant funds and on the

implementation of program activities. In

addition, the agreement must describe

the nature of the activities to be

undertaken by the subgrantee, the scope

of the subgrantee’s authority, and the

amount of insurance to be obtained by

the grantee and the subgrantee to protect

their respective interests.

(C) The grantee shall be responsible

for monitoring, and for providing

technical assistance to, any subgrantee

to ensure compliance with HUD

program requirements, including OMB

Circular Nos. A–110 and A–122, that

apply to the acceptance and use of

assistance by private nonprofit

organizations. The procurement

requirements of Attachment O of

Circular A–110 apply to RCs. The

grantee must also ensure that

subgrantees have appropriate insurance

liability coverage.

(d) Selection Criteria and Ranking

Factors

HUD will review each application to

determine that it meets the requirements

of this NOFA and to assign points in

accordance with the selection criteria. A

total of 200 points is the maximum

score available under the selection

criteria. An application must receive a

score of at least 151 points out of the

maximum of 200 points that may be

awarded under this competition to be

eligible for funding. After assigning

points to each application, HUD Offices

will rank the applications in order. The

Award Office will select the highest

ranking application from each HUD

Office whose eligible activities can be

fully funded. The Award Office will

then select the highest scored unfunded

application submitted to it regardless of

Field Office and continue the process

until all funds allocated to it have been

awarded or to the point where there are

insufficient acceptable applications for

which to award funds. Grants under this

program are categorically excluded from

review under the National

Environmental Policy Act of 1969

(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321). However, prior

to the award of grant funds under the

program, HUD will perform an

environmental review to the extent

required under the provisions of 24 CFR

50.4. Each application submitted will be

evaluated on the basis of the following

selection criteria:

(1) The Quality of the Plan To Address

the Problem (Maximum Points: 50)

In assessing this criterion, HUD will

consider the following factors:

(i) The quality of the applicant’s plan

to address the drug-related crime

problem, and the problems associated

with drug-related crime, in the projects

proposed for funding, and how well the

activities proposed for funding fit in

with the plan. (maximum points: 10)

(ii) The anticipated effectiveness of

the plan and the proposed activities in

reducing or eliminating drug-related

crime problems over an extended

period. (maximum points: 10)

(iii) How the activities identified in

the plan will affect and address the

problem of drug-related crime in

adjacent properties. (maximum points:

5)

(iv) Evidence that the proposed

activities have been found successful in

similar circumstances in terms of

controlling drug-related crime.

(maximum points: 5)

(v) Whether the property is located

within an area identified as having a

Safe Neighborhood Action Plan (SNAP)

or similar plan or program designated

for combatting drug-related criminal

activity. (20 points if so located, 0

points if not.)

(2) The Support of Local Government/

Law Enforcement Agencies (Maximum

Points: 20)

In assessing this criterion, HUD will

consider the following factors:

(i) Evidence that the project owner

has sought assistance in deterring drugrelated crime problems and the extent to

which the owner has participated in

programs that are available from local

governments or law enforcement

agencies; (maximum points: 10) and

(ii) The level of support by the local

government or law enforcement agency

for the applicant’s proposed activities

(Maximum points: 10)
9548 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 33 / Friday, February 17, 1995 / Notices

(3) The Extent of the Drug-Related

Crime Problem in the Housing Project

Proposed for Assistance (Maximum

Points: 50)

In assessing this criterion, HUD will

consider the degree of severity of the

drug-related crime problem in the

project proposed for funding, as

demonstrated by the information

required to be submitted under section

III.(h) of this NOFA.

(4) The Support of Residents in

Planning and Implementing the

Proposed Activities. (Maximum Points:

30)

In assessing this criterion, HUD will

consider the following factors:

(i) Evidence that comments and

suggestions have been sought from

residents to the proposed plan for this

program and the degree to which

residents will be involved in

implementation. (maximum points: 20)

(ii) Evidence of resident support for

the proposed plan. (maximum points:

10)

(5) Capacity of Owner and Management

To Undertake the Proposed Activities:

(Maximum Points: 50)

In assessing this criterion, HUD will

consider the following:

(i) The most recent Management

Review completed by the HUD Office.

(Note: The HUD Office will conduct

another management review after

application submission if the most

recent management review is more than

one year old). (maximum points: 40)

(ii) Submission of evidence that

project owners have initiated other

efforts to reduce drug-related crime by

working with tenant/law enforcement

groups (e.g., establishment of ‘‘Tenant

Watches’’ or similar efforts). (maximum

points: 5)

(iii) Submission of evidence that

project management carefully screens

applicants for units and takes

appropriate steps to deal with tenants

known or suspected to exhibit drugrelated criminal behavior. (maximum

points: 5)

II. Application Process

(a) Application Form

An application form may be obtained

from the HUD Office having jurisdiction

over the location of the applicant

project. The HUD Office will be

available to provide technical assistance

on the preparation of applications

during the application period.

(b) Application Submission

A separate application must be

submitted for each project. An

application (original and one copy)

must be received by the deadline at the

appropriate HUD Office with

jurisdiction over the applicant project,

Attention: Director of Multifamily

Housing. It is not sufficient for the

application to bear a postage date within

the submission time period.

Applications submitted by facsimile

(‘‘FAX’’) are not acceptable and will not

be considered. Applications received

after the deadline will not be

considered. No applications will be

accepted after 4:00 p.m. (local time) for

the appropriate HUD Office on April 18,

1995. This application deadline is firm

as to date and hour. In the interest of

fairness to all competing applicants, the

Department will treat as ineligible for

consideration any application that is

received after the deadline. Applicants

should take this practice into account

and make early submission of their

materials to avoid any risk of loss of

eligibility brought about by

unanticipated delays or other deliveryrelated problems.

(c) Application Notification

HUD will notify all applicants

whether or not they were selected for

funding.

III. Checklist of Application

Submission Requirements

To qualify for a grant under this

program, an applicant must submit an

application to HUD that contains the

following:

(a) Application for Federal Assistance

form (Standard Form SF–424 and SF–

424A). The form must be signed by the

applicant.

(b) A description of the applicant’s

plan for addressing the problem of drugrelated crime in the projects for which

funding is sought, which should include

the activities to be funded under this

program along with all other initiatives

being undertaken by the applicant. The

description should also include a

discussion of:

(1) The anticipated effectiveness of

the plan and the proposed activities in

reducing or eliminating drug-related

crime problems over an extended

period.

(2) How the activities identified in the

plan will affect and address the problem

of drug-related crime in adjacent

properties.

(3) Other efforts that project owners

have initiated to reduce drug-related

crime by working with tenant/law

enforcement groups (e.g., establishment

of ‘‘Tenant Watches’’ or similar efforts).

(4) Procedures that project

management uses to screen applicants

for units and steps taken to deal with

tenants known or suspected to exhibit

drug-related criminal behavior.

(c) Each applicant for funding for

physical improvements must submit a

written plan fully describing the

physical improvements to be

undertaken with dollar costs per unit for

each item. This plan must be signed by

the owner.

(d) Each applicant must submit a

letter from the local government or

police (law enforcement) agency that

describes the type of drug-related crime

in the project proposed for grant

funding and its immediate environs,

and expresses a commitment to assist

the owner in taking steps to reduce or

eliminate the drug-related crime

problems of the project.

(e) A description of the procedure

used to involve residents in the

development of the plan and written

summaries of any comments and

suggestions received from residents on

the proposed plan, along with evidence

that the owner carefully considered the

comments of residents and incorporated

their suggestions in the plan, when

practical.

(f) A description of the support of

residents for the proposed activities and

the ways in which residents will be

involved in implementing the plan.

Letters of support from residents or a

resolution from the resident

organization may be used.

(g) A copy of the most recent

management review performed by HUD

and evidence supporting the capacity of

the owner and management to

undertake the proposed activities.

(h) Detailed information, such as local

government and police reports,

evidencing the degree of drug-related

crime in the project and adjacent

properties to demonstrate the degree of

severity of the drug-related crime

problem. This information may consist

of:

(1) Objective data. The best available

objective data on the nature, source, and

extent of the problem of drug-related

crime, and the problems associated with

drug-related crime. These data may

include (but are not necessarily limited

to) crime statistics from Federal, State,

tribal or local law enforcement agencies,

or information from the applicant’s

records on the types and sources of

drug-related crime in the project

proposed for assistance; descriptive data

as to the types of offenders committing

drug-related crime in the applicant’s

project (e.g., age, residence, etc.); the

number of lease terminations or

evictions for drug-related criminal

activity; the number of emergency room

admissions for drug use or drug-related

crime; the number of police calls for
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 33 / Friday, February 17, 1995 / Notices 9549

drug-related criminal activity; the

number of residents placed in treatment

for substance abuse; and the school

drop-out rate and level of absenteeism

for youth. If crime statistics are not

available at the project or precinct level,

the applicant may use other reliable,

objective data including those derived

from the owner’s records or those of

private groups that collect such data.

The crime statistics should be reported

both in real numbers, and as a

percentage of the residents in each

project (e.g., 20 arrests for distribution

of heroin in a project with 100 residents

reflects a 20 percent occurrence rate).

The data should cover the past threeyear period and, to the extent feasible,

should indicate whether these data

reflect a percentage increase or decrease

in drug-related crime over the past

several years. Applicants must address

in their assessment how these crimes

have affected the project and how the

applicant’s overall plan and strategy is

specifically tailored to address these

drug-related crime problems.

(2) Other data on the extent of drugrelated crime. To the extent that

objective data as described under

paragraph (1) of this section may not be

available, or to complement that data,

the assessment may use relevant

information from other sources that

have a direct bearing on drug-related

crime problems in the project proposed

for assistance. However, if other

relevant information is to be used in

place of, rather than to complement,

objective data, the application must

indicate the reason(s) why objective

data could not be obtained and what

efforts were made to obtain it. Examples

of other data include: resident/staff

surveys on drug-related issues or on-site

reviews to determine drug activity; the

use of local government or scholarly

studies or other research conducted in

the past year that analyze drug activity

in the targeted project; vandalism costs

and related vacancies attributable to

drug-related crime; information from

schools, health service providers,

residents and police; and the opinions

and observations of individuals having

direct knowledge of drug-related crime

problems concerning the nature and

extent of those problems in the project

proposed for assistance. (These

individuals may include law

enforcement officials, resident or

community leaders, school officials,

community medical officials, drug

treatment or counseling professionals,

or other social service providers.)

(i) If applying for drug treatment

program funding, a certification that the

applicant has notified and consulted

with the relevant Single State Agency or

other local authority with drug program

coordination responsibilities concerning

its application; and that the proposed

drug treatment program has been

reviewed by the relevant Single State

Agency or other local authority and that

it is consistent with the State treatment

plan; and that the relevant Single State

Agency or other local authority has

determined that the drug treatment

provider(s) has provided drug treatment

services to similar populations,

identified in the application, for two

prior years.

(j) Drug-free workplace. The

certification with regard to the drug-free

workplace required by 24 CFR part 24,

subpart F and appendix C.

(k) Disclosure of Lobbying Activities.

If the amount applied for is greater than

$100,000, the certification with regard

to lobbying required by 24 CFR part 87

must be included. See section VI.(h),

below, of this NOFA. If the amount

applied for is greater than $100,000, and

the applicant has made or has agreed to

make any payment using

nonappropriated funds for lobbying

activity, as described in 24 CFR part 87,

the submission must also include the

Disclosure of Lobbying Activities Form

(SF–LLL).

(l) Form HUD–2880, Applicant/

Recipient Disclosure/Update Report.

IV. Corrections to Deficient

Applications

HUD will notify the applicant within

10 working days of the receipt of the

application if there are any curable

technical deficiencies in the

application. Curable technical

deficiencies relate to minimum

eligibility requirements (such as

certifications and signatures) that are

necessary for funding approval but that

do not relate to the quality of the

applicant’s program proposal under the

selection criteria. The owner must

submit corrections in accordance with

the information provided by HUD

within 14 calendar days of the date of

the HUD notification.

V. Other Matters

(a) Nondiscrimination and Equal

Opportunity

The following nondiscrimination and

equal opportunity requirements apply:

(1) The requirements of Title VIII of

the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (Fair

Housing Act) (42 U.S.C. 3600–20) and

implementing regulations issued at

subchapter A of title 24 of the Code of

Federal Regulations, as amended by 54

FR 3232 (published January 23, 1989);

Executive Order 11063 (Equal

Opportunity in Housing) and

implementing regulations at 24 CFR part

107; and title VI of the Civil Rights Act

of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d–2000d–4)

(Nondiscrimination in Federally

Assisted Programs) and implementing

regulations issued at 24 CFR part 1;

(2) The prohibitions against

discrimination on the basis of age under

the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 (42

U.S.C. 6101–07) and implementing

regulations at 24 CFR part 146, and the

prohibitions against discrimination

against handicapped individuals under

section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of

1973 (29 U.S.C. 794) and implementing

regulations at 24 CFR part 8;

(3) The requirements of Executive

Order 11246 (Equal Employment

Opportunity) and the regulations issued

under the Order at 41 CFR Chapter 60;

(4) The requirements of Executive

Orders 11625, 12432, and 12138.

Consistent with HUD’s responsibilities

under these Orders, recipients must

make efforts to encourage the use of

minority and women’s business

enterprises in connection with funded

activities.

(b) Environmental Impact

At the time of the publication of the

proposed rule for the Federally Assisted

Low Income Housing Drug Elimination

Program, a Finding of No Significant

Impact with respect to the environment

was made in accordance with HUD

regulations at 24 CFR part 50 that

implement section 102(2)(C) of the

National Environmental Policy Act of

1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332). The initial

finding applies to this NOFA, and is

available for public inspection and

copying from 7:30 to 5:30 weekdays in

the Office of the Rules Docket Clerk,

Room 10276, 451 Seventh Street, SW.,

Washington, DC 20410.

(c) Federalism Impact

The General Counsel, as the

Designated Official under section 6(a) of

Executive Order 12612, Federalism, has

determined that the provisions of this

NOFA do not have federalism

implications within the meaning of the

Order. The NOFA announces the

availability of funds and provides the

application requirements for Federally

Assisted Low Income Housing Drug

Elimination Grants, which fund

activities designed to deter drug-related

crime. Deterring drug-related crime is a

recognized goal of general benefit

without direct implications on States or

their political subdivisions, or the

relationship between the Federal

government and the States, or on the

distribution of power and

responsibilities among various levels of

government.
9550 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 33 / Friday, February 17, 1995 / Notices

(d) Family Impact

The General Counsel, as the

Designated Official under Executive

Order 12606, The Family, has

determined that the policies announced

in this NOFA would not have potential

for significant impact on family

formation, maintenance, and general

well-being, except indirectly to the

extent of the social and other benefits

expected from this program of

assistance.

(e) Section 102 HUD Reform Act

Applicant/Recipient Disclosures

Accountability in the Provision of HUD

Assistance

HUD has promulgated a final rule to

implement section 102 of the

Department of Housing and Urban

Development Reform Act of 1989 (HUD

Reform Act). The final rule is codified

at 24 CFR part 12. Section 102 contains

a number of provisions that are

designed to ensure greater

accountability and integrity in the

provision of certain types of assistance

administered by HUD. On January 14,

1992, HUD published in the Federal

Register (57 FR 1942) additional

information that gave the public

(including applicants for, and recipients

of, HUD assistance) further information

on the implementation of section 102.

The documentation, public access, and

disclosure requirements of section 102

are applicable to assistance awarded

under this NOFA as follows:

Documentation and Public Access

HUD will ensure that documentation

and other information regarding each

application submitted pursuant to this

NOFA are sufficient to indicate the basis

upon which assistance was provided or

denied. This material, including any

letters of support, will be made

available for public inspection for a fiveyear period beginning not less than 30

days after the award of the assistance.

Material will be made available in

accordance with the Freedom of

Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) and

HUD’s implementing regulations at 24

CFR part 15. In addition, HUD will

include the recipients of assistance

pursuant to this NOFA in its quarterly

Federal Register notice of all recipients

of HUD assistance awarded on a

competitive basis. (See 24 CFR 12.14(a)

and 12.16(b), and the notice published

in the Federal Register on January 16,

1992 (57 FR 1942), for further

information on these requirements.)

Disclosures. HUD will make available

to the public for five years all applicant

disclosure reports (HUD Form 2880)

submitted in connection with this

NOFA. Update reports (also Form 2880)

will be made available along with the

applicant disclosure reports, but in no

case for a period less than three years.

All reports—both applicant disclosures

and updates—will be made available in

accordance with the Freedom of

Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) and

HUD’s implementing regulations at 24

CFR part 15. (See 24 CFR subpart C, and

the notice published in the Federal

Register on January 16, 1992 (57 FR

1942), for further information on these

disclosure requirements.)

(f) Section 103 HUD Reform Act

HUD’s regulation implementing

section 103 of the Department of

Housing and Urban Development

Reform Act of 1989 was published May

13, 1991 (56 FR 22088) and became

effective on June 12, 1991. That

regulation, codified at 24 CFR part 4,

applies to this funding competition. The

requirements of the rule continue to

apply until the announcement of the

selection of successful applicants.

HUD employees involved in the

review of applications and in the

making of funding decisions are limited

by 24 CFR part 4 from providing

advance information to any person

(other than an authorized employee of

HUD) concerning funding decisions, or

from otherwise giving any applicant an

unfair competitive advantage. Persons

who apply for assistance in this

competition should confine their

inquiries to the subject areas permitted

under 24 CFR part 4. Applicants who

have general questions about what

information may be discussed with

them during the selection may contact

the HUD Office of Ethics (202) 708–3815

or (202) 708–9300 (TDD). (These are not

toll-free numbers.)

(g) Section 112 HUD Reform Act

Section 13 of the Department of

Housing and Urban Development Act

contains two provisions dealing with

efforts to influence HUD’s decisions

with respect to financial assistance. The

first imposes disclosure requirements on

those who are typically involved in

these efforts—those who pay others to

influence the award of assistance or the

taking of a management action by HUD

and those who are paid to provide the

influence. The second restricts the

payment of fees to those who are paid

to influence the award of HUD

assistance, if the fees are tied to the

number of housing units received or are

based on the amount of assistance

received, or if they are contingent upon

the receipt of assistance.

Section 13 was implemented by final

rule published in the Federal Register

on May 17, 1991 (56 FR 22912). If

readers are involved in any efforts to

influence HUD in these ways, they are

urged to read the final rule, particularly

the examples contained in Appendix A

of the rule.

(h) Prohibition Against Lobbying

Activities

The use of funds awarded under this

NOFA is subject to the disclosure

requirements and prohibitions of

section 319 of the Department of Interior

and Related Agencies Appropriations

Act for Fiscal Year 1990 (31 U.S.C.

1352) (the Byrd Amendment) and the

implementing regulations at 24 CFR part

87. These authorities prohibit recipients

of federal contracts, grants, or loans

from using appropriated funds for

lobbying the executive or legislative

branches of the federal government in

connection with a specific contract,

grant, or loan. The prohibition also

covers the awarding of contracts, grants,

cooperative agreements, or loans unless

the recipient has made an acceptable

certification regarding lobbying. Under

24 CFR part 87, applicants, recipients,

and subrecipients of assistance

exceeding $100,000 must certify that no

federal funds have been or will be spent

on lobbying activities in connection

with the assistance. Indian Housing

Authorities (IHAs) established by an

Indian tribe as a result of the exercise of

their sovereign power are excluded from

coverage, but IHAs established under

State law are not excluded from

coverage.

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 11901 et. seq.

Dated: January 31, 1995.

Nicolas P. Retsinas,

Assistant Secretary for Housing—Federal

Housing Commissioner.

Appendix A: Field Office Addresses and

Telephone Numbers

Note: The first line of the mailing address

for all offices is U.S. Department of Housing

and Urban Development. Telephone numbers

listed are not toll-free.

HUD—New England Area

Connecticut State Office, First Floor, 330

Main Street, Hartford, CT 06106–1860,

(203) 240–4523

Maine State Office, 99 Franklin Street,

Bangor, ME 04401–4925, (207) 945–0467

Massachusetts State Office, Room 375,

Thomas P. O’Neill, Jr. Federal Building, 10

Causeway Street, Boston, MA 02222–1092,

(617) 565–5234

New Hampshire State Office, Norris Cotton

Federal Building, 275 Chestnut Street,

Manchester, NH 03101–2487, (603) 666–

7681

Rhode Island State Office, Sixth Floor, 10

Weybosset Street, Providence, RI 02903–

2808, (401) 528–5351
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 33 / Friday, February 17, 1995 / Notices 9551

Vermont State Office, Room 244, Federal

Building, 11 Elmwood Ave., P.O. Box 879,

Burlington, VT 05402–0879, (802) 951–

6290

HUD—New York, New Jersey Area

New Jersey State Office, Thirteenth Floor,

One Newark Center, Newark, NJ 07102–

5260, (201) 622–7900

New York State Office, 26 Federal Plaza, New

York, NY 10278–0068, (212) 264–6500

Albany Area Office, 52 Corporate Circle,

Albany, NY 12203–5121, (518) 464–4200

Buffalo Area Office, Fifth Floor, Lafayette

Court, 465 Main Street, Buffalo, NY 14203–

1780, (716) 846–5755

Camden Area Office, Second Floor, Hudson

Building, 800 Hudson Square, Camden, NJ

08102–1156, (609) 757–5081

HUD—Midatlantic Area

Delaware State Office, Suite 850, 824 Market

Street, Wilmington, DE 19801–3016, (302)

573–6300

District of Columbia Office, 820 First Street,

NE, Washington, D.C. 20002–4502, (202)

275–9200

Maryland State Office, Fifth Floor, City

Crescent Building, 10 South Howard

Street, Baltimore, MD 21201–2505, (401)

962–2520

Pennsylvania State Office, Liberty Square

Building, 105 South 7th Street,

Philadelphia, PA 19106–3392, (215) 597–

2560

Virginia State Office, The 3600 Centre, 3600

West Broad Street, P.O. Box 90331,

Richmond, VA 23230–0331, (804) 278–

4507

West Virginia State Office, Suite 708, 405

Capitol Street, Charleston, WV 25301–

1795, (304) 347–7000,

Pittsburgh Area Office, 412 Old Post Office

Courthouse, 7th Avenue and Grant Street,

Pittsburgh, PA 15219–1906, (412) 644–

6428

HUD—Southeast/Caribbean Area

Alabama State Office, Suite 300, Beacon

Ridge Tower, 600 Beacon Parkway, West,

Birmingham, AL 35209–3144, (205) 290–

7617

Caribbean Office, New San Juan Office

Building, 159 Carlos Chardon Avenue, San

Juan, PR 00918–1804, (809) 766–6121

Florida State Office, Suite 3100, 8600

Northwest 36th Street, P.O. Box 4022,

Miami, FL 33166–4022, (305) 717–2500

Georgia State Office, Richard B. Russell

Federal Building, 75 Spring Street, S.W.,

Atlanta, GA 30303–3388, (404) 331–5136

Kentucky State Office, 601 West Broadway,

P.O. Box 1044, Louisville, KY 40201–1044,

(502) 582–5251

Mississippi State Office, Suite 910, Doctor

A.H. McCoy Federal Building, 100 West

Capitol Street, Jackson, MS 39269–1016,

(601) 965–5308

North Carolina State Office, Koger Building,

2306 West Meadowview Road, Greensboro,

NC 27407–3707, (919) 547–4001

South Carolina State Office, Strom

Thurmond Federal Building, 1835

Assembly Street, Columbia, SC 29201–

2480, (803) 765–5592

Tennessee State Office, Suite 200, 251

Cumberland Bend Drive, Nashville, TN

37228–1803, (615) 736–5213

Coral Gables Area Office, Gables 1 Tower,

1320 South Dixie Highway, Coral Gables,

FL 33146–2911, (305) 662–4500

Jacksonville Area Office, Suite 2200,

Southern Bell Tower, 301 West Bay Street,

Jacksonville, FL 32202–5121, (904) 232–

2626

Knoxville Area Office, Third Floor, John J.

Duncan Federal Building, 710 Locust

Street, Knoxville, TN 37902–2526, (615)

545–4384

Memphis Area Office, Suite 1200, One

Memphis Place, 200 Jefferson Avenue,

Memphis, TN 38103–2335, (901) 544–3367

Orlando Area Office, Suite 270, Langley

Building, 3751 Maguire Boulevard,

Orlando, FL 32803–3032, (407) 648–6441

Tampa Area Office, Suite 700, Timberlake

Federal Building Annex, 501 East Polk

Street, Tampa, FL 33602–3945, (813) 228–

2501

HUD—Midwest Area

Illinois State Office, Ralph H. Metcalfe

Federal Building, 77 West Jackson

Boulevard, Chicago, IL 60604–3507, (312)

353–5680

Indiana State Office, 151 North Delaware

Street, Indianapolis, IN 46204–2526, (317)

226–6303

Michigan State Office, Patrick V. McNamara

Federal Building, 477 Michigan Avenue,

Detroit, MI 48226–2592, (313) 226–7900

Minnesota State Office, 220 Second Street,

South, Minneapolis, MN 55401–2195,

(612) 370–3000

Ohio State Office, 200 North High Street,

Columbus, OH 43215–2499, (614) 469–

5737

Wisconsin State Office, Suite 1380, Henry S.

Reuss Federal Plaza, 310 West Wisconsin

Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53203–2289, (414)

297–3214

Cincinnati Area Office, Room 9002 Federal

Office Building, 550 Main Street,

Cincinnati, OH 45202–3253, (513) 684–

2884

Cleveland Area Office, Fifth Floor,

Renaissance Building, 1350 Euclid

Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44115–1815, (216)

522–4058

Flint Area Office, Room 200, 605 North

Saginaw Street, Flint, MI 48502–1953,

(313) 766–5109

Grand Rapids Area Office, 2922 Fuller

Avenue, NE, Grand Rapids, MI 49505–

3499, (616) 456–2100

Springfield Area Office, Suite 206, 509 West

Capitol Street, Springfield, IL 62704–1906,

(217) 492–4085

HUD—Southwest Area

Arkansas State Office, Suite 900, TCBY

Tower, 425 West Capitol Avenue, Little

Rock, AR 72201–3488 (501) 324–5931,

Louisiana State Office, Fisk Federal Building,

1661 Canal Street, New Orleans, LA

70112–2887 (504) 589–7200,

New Mexico State Office, 625 Truman Street,

NE, Albuquerque, NM 87110–6443 (505)

262–6463

Oklahoma State Office, Murrah Federal

Building, 200 N.W. 5th Street, Oklahoma

City, OK 73102–3202, (405) 231–4181

Texas State Office, 1600 Throckmorton

Street, P.O. Box 2905, Fort Worth, TX

76113–2905, (817) 885–5401

Dallas Area Office, Room 860, 525 Griffin

Street, Dallas, TX 75202–5007, (214) 767–

8359

Houston Area Office, Suite 200, Norfolk

Tower, 2211 Norfolk, Houston, TX 77098–

4096, (713) 834–3274

Lubbock Area Office, Federal Office

Building, 1205 Texas Avenue, Lubbock, TX

79401–4093, (806) 743–7265

San Antonio Area Office, Washington

Square, 800 Dolorosa Street, San Antonio,

TX 78207–4563, (210) 229–6800

Shreveport Area Office, Suite 1510, 401

Edwards Street, Shreveport, LA 71101–

3107, (318) 676–3385

Tulsa Area Office, Suite 110, Boston Place,

1516 South Boston Street, Tulsa, OK

74119–4032, (918) 581–7434

Great Plains

Iowa State Office, Room 239, Federal

Building, 210 Walnut Street, Des Moines,

IA 50309–2155, (515) 284–4512

Kansas/Missouri State Office, Room 200,

Gateway Tower II, 400 State Avenue,

Kansas City, KS 66101–2406, (913) 551–

5462

Nebraska State Office, Executive Tower

Centre, 10909 Mill Valley Road, Omaha,

NE 68154–3955, (402) 492–3100

Saint Louis Area Field Office, Third Floor,

Robert A. Young Federal Building, 1222

Spruce Street, St. Louis, MO 63103–2836,

(314) 539–6583

HUD—Rocky Mountains Area

Colorado State Office, 633 17th Street,

Denver, CO 80202–3607, (303) 672–5440

Montana State Office, Room 340, Federal

Office Building, Drawer 10095, 301 S. Park,

Helena, MT 59626–0095, (406) 449–5205

North Dakota State Office, Federal Building,

653 2nd Avenue North, P.O. Box 2483,

Fargo, ND 58108–2483, (701) 239–5136

South Dakota State Office, Suite I–201, 2400

West 49th Street, Sioux Falls, SD 57105–

6558, (605) 330–4223,

Utah State Office Suite 550, 257 Tower, 257

East, 200 South, Salt Lake City, UT 84111–

2048

Wyoming State Office, 4225 Federal Office

Building, 100 East B Street, P.O. Box 120,

Casper, WY 82602–1918, (307) 261–5252

HUD—Pacific/Hawaii Area

Arizona State Office, Suite 1600, Two

Arizona Center, 400 North 5th Street,

Phoenix, AZ 85004–2361, (602) 379–4434

California State Office, Philip Burton Federal

Building and U.S. Courthouse, 450 Golden

Gate Avenue, P.O. Box 36003, San

Francisco, CA 94102–3448, (415) 556–4752

Hawaii State Office, Suite 500, 7 Waterfront

Plaza, 500 Ala Moana Boulevard,

Honolulu, HI 96813–4918, (808) 522–8175

Nevada State Office, Suite 205, 1500 E.

Tropicana Avenue, Las Vegas, NV 89119–

6516, (702) 388–6500

Fresno Area Office, Suite 138, 1630 E. Shaw

Avenue, Fresno, CA 93710–8193, (209)

487–5033

Los Angeles Area Office, 1615 West Olympic

Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90015–3801,

(213) 251–7122
9552 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 33 / Friday, February 17, 1995 / Notices

Reno Area Office, Suite 114, 1575 Delucchi

Lane, Reno, NV 89502–6581, (702) 784–

5356

Sacramento Area Office, Suite 200, 777 12th

Avenue, Sacramento, CA 95814–1997,

(916) 551–1351

San Diego Area Office, Suite 300, Mission

City Corporate Center, 2365 Northside

Drive, San Diego, CA 92108–2712, (619)

557–5310

Santa Ana Area Office, Suite 500, 3 Hutton

Centre, Santa Ana, CA 92707–5764, (714)

957–7333

Tucson Area Office, Suite 700, Security

Pacific Bank Plaza, 33 North Stone

Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85701–1467, (602)

670–6237

HUD—Northwest/Alaska Area

Alaska State Office, Suite 401, University

Plaza Building, 949 East 36th Avenue,

Anchorage, AK 99508–4399, (907) 271–

4170

Idaho State Office, Suite 220, Plaza IV, 800

Park Boulevard, Boise, ID 83712–7743,

(208) 334–1990

Oregon State Office, 520 S.W. 6th Avenue,

Portland, OR 97204–1596, (503) 326–2561

Washington State Office, Suite 200, Seattle

Federal Office Building, 909 First Avenue,

Seattle, WA 98104–1000, (206) 220–5101

Spokane Area Office, Eighth Floor East, Farm

Credit Bank Building, West 601 First

Avenue, Spokane, WA 99204–0317, (509)

353–2510

[FR Doc. 95–3995 Filed 2–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210–27–P