alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM 10Q
FILING AT MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001059496
<NAME> AMERICAN LAWYER MEDIA HOLDINGS INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             388
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,014
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,893
<INVENTORY>                                      1,417
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,253
<PP&E>                                          22,037
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,854
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 348,084
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           39,137
<BONDS>                                        220,874
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,467
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   348,084
<SALES>                                         38,843
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,843
<CGS>                                           15,891
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   42,872
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (13)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,328
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,344)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (806)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,538)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,538)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Ex-99.4 Aggregate Statement of Principal and Interest Distribution to
        Certificatesholders.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
    Class           Interest           Principle            Losses          Ending Balance
    -----           --------           ---------            ------          --------------
<S>                   <C>               <C>                 <C>             <C>
1A1                   245,723.25        6,199,000.00                   -                  -
1A2                   701,929.23        1,328,932.36                   -      10,210,067.64
1A3                 1,796,697.00                   -                   -      28,519,000.00
1A4                 1,982,273.56       17,699,366.20                   -      21,300,059.74
1A5                 3,185,671.51      (2,426,193.71)                   -      40,105,276.38
1A6                   189,202.09                   -                   -       3,536,487.25
1A7                   111,399.43                   -                   -         916,866.70
1A8                    24,813.58         (24,813.58)                   -         381,187.26
2A                  2,377,605.03        5,893,346.07                   -      32,935,696.15
3A                  4,139,848.03       18,064,064.71                   -      50,799,196.06
3B1                   345,152.19          345,997.32                   -       4,908,113.17
3B2                   141,197.17          141,542.90                   -       2,007,843.86
3B3                    84,717.04           84,924.48                   -       1,204,688.15
3B4                    56,480.16           56,618.46                   -         803,155.68
3B5                    25,104.42           25,165.89                   -         356,988.30
3B6                    36,703.82           36,793.70           39,463.17         482,470.35
3X                    753,206.66                   -                   -                  -
B1                    206,002.86           40,805.05                   -       3,062,824.27
B2                    109,441.07           21,678.08                   -       1,627,155.66
B3                     51,503.97           10,201.92                   -         765,754.44
B4                     45,064.35            8,926.32                   -         670,011.00
B5                     19,305.87            3,824.09                   -         287,036.94
B6P                            -            6,379.24                0.07         478,703.65
B6X                    32,195.37                   -                   -                  -
R1                             -                   -                   -                  -
R2                             -                   -                   -                  -
R3                             -                   -                   -                  -
R4                             -                   -                   -                  -
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 36 (Thursday, February 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 10138]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4346]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

Bureau of Political-Military Affairs
[Public Notice 2168]


Policy on Munitions Export Licenses to Ecuador and Peru

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Public notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that all licenses and other approvals 
to export or otherwise transfer defense articles or defense services to 
Ecuador or Peru are suspended until further notice pursuant to Sections 
38, and 42 of the Arms Export Control Act.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 9, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher Kavanagh, Office of Export Control Policy, Bureau of 
Political-Military Affairs, Department of State (202-647-4231).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Effective immediately, it is the policy of 
the U.S. Government to deny all requests for licenses and other 
approvals to export or otherwise transfer defense articles and defense 
services to Ecuador or Peru. In addition, the Department of State has 
suspended all previously issued licenses and approvals authorizing the 
export or other transfer of defense articles or defense services to 
Ecuador or Peru. This action has been taken in response to the 
continuing conflict on the border between Ecuador and Peru.
    The licenses and approvals subject to this policy include 
manufacturing licenses, technical assistance agreements, technical 
data, and commercial military exports of any kind involving Ecuador or 
Peru and which are subject to controls under the Arms Export Control 
Act. This policy also prohibits the use in connection with Ecuador or 
Peru of any exemptions from licensing or other approval requirements 
included in the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) (22 
CFR Parts 120-130), with the exception of those exemptions specified in 
Section 126.1(a), unless a specific written exception is provided by 
the Office of Defense Trade Controls.
    Exceptions to this policy will be made for certain U.S. Munitions 
List Category XIII(B)(1) items from banking and financial institutions.
    This action has been taken pursuant to Sections 38 and 42 of the 
Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. Secs. 2778, 2791) and Sec. 126.7 of 
the ITAR in furtherance of the foreign policy of the United States.

    Dated: February 9, 1995.
Eric D. Newsom,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 95-4346 Filed 2-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<CIK>          0001059137
<NAME>         SIERRA HOLDINGS GROUP, INC.
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                              9524
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        9524
<PP&E>                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                             0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          9524
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  11050
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                           9327
<OTHER-SE>                                             (10853)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            9524
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           0
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       31837
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (31837)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    (31837)
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (31837)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.00)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 41 (Thursday, March 2, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 11695]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5117]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


POSTAL RATE COMMISSION

Notice of Commission Visit

February 23, 1995.
    Notice is hereby given that on February 14, 1995, members of the 
Commission, certain advisory staff personnel and the OCA visited the 
offices and processing facilities of the Baltimore Sun in Baltimore, 
Maryland. A report of the visit is on file in the Commission's Docket 
Room. For further information contact Margaret P. Crenshaw, Secretary 
of the Commission, at 202-789-6840.
Margaret P. Crenshaw,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-5117 Filed 3-1-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1568

Illinois Tool Works: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions.

pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXHIBIT 31.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Abaxis, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:    June 12, 2009
    /s/ Alberto R. Santa InesAlberto R. Santa InesChief Financial Officer and Vice President of Finance
| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      November 10, 2008 | /s/      Ronald S. Saks                                                      |
|------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                         | Ronald      S. Saks                                                          |
|                         | President      and Chief Executive Officer(Principal      Executive Officer) |
|                         |                                                                         |
|                         |                                                                         |
| Date:      November 10, 2008 | /s/      Lawrence E. Dickinson                                               |
|                         | Lawrence      E. Dickinson                                                   |
|                         | Secretary      and Chief Financial Officer                                   |
|                         | (Principal      Financial Officer and PrincipalAccounting      Officer)      |
Ex-99.1 a)

                        REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



Mr. Andrew D. Woodward
President
BankAmerica Mortgage, a Division of Bank of America, FSB


We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying report
titled REPORT OF MANAGEMENT, that Bank of America FSB (the Company) complied
with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers
Association of America's UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS
(USAP) during the year ended December 31, 1998. Management is responsible for
the Company's compliance with those requirements. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on management's assertions about the Company's compliance
based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with those
requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in
the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the
Company's compliance with specified requirements.

In our opinion, management's assertion, that the Company complied with the
aforementioned requirements during the year ended December 31, 1998, is fairly
stated, in all material respects.


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

January 29, 1999


Ex-99.1 b)


March 5, 1999

To the Board of Directors and Stockholder
of Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion about Chase Manhattan Mortgage
Corporation's (the "Company") compliance with the minimum servicing standards
("standards") identified in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's
UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS ("USAP") as of and for
the year ended



                                      -8-
<PAGE>


December 31, 1998 included in the accompanying management assertion (see Exhibit
I). The Company performs loan subservicing functions for the residential loan
servicing portfolio of Chemical Mortgage Company. Management is responsible for
the Company's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
entity's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
standards and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the
Company's compliance with the standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned standards as of and for the year ended December 31, 1998 is
fairly stated, in all material respects.



                                      -9-
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. WR-86,125-01 & WR-86,125-02

EX PARTE HUBERT IRVINE JR, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. 22706-A & 22704-A IN THE 356 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM HARDIN COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex

parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of unlawful

possession of firearm and deadly conduct and sentenced to five years’ imprisonment for each cause. 

He did not appeal his convictions.

Applicant contends, among other things, that histrial counsel rendered ineffective assistance

by failing to raise a defense of justification, failing to interview witnesses, failing to file motions,

failing to challenge the State’s inability to produce the videotape of his statement to police, and

failing to investigate and raise the issue of Applicant’s mental illness. 
2

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these

circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294

(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court

shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The

trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. 

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the

performance of Applicant’s trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel’s deficient

performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and

conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for

habeas corpus relief.

These applications will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. 

The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must

be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court. 

Filed: January 11, 2017

Do not publish
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 13, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1553

Sensata Technologies, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn