alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 42 (Friday, March 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 11974]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5277]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-5164-2]


Meeting of the Small Town Environmental Planning Task Force

    On March 28 and 29, 1995, the Small Town Environmental Planning 
Task Force (STTF) will conduct its fourth meeting. The purpose of the 
meeting is to review and discuss the Agency's responses to their 
recommendations paper presented at the October 1994 meeting, discuss 
the progress of the various work groups, discusss current proposals 
which focus on regulatory reform and consultation, and activities 
necessary to comply with the provisions of the Small Town Environmental 
Planning Act (42 U.S.C. 6908).
    The Task Force is charged with identifying regulations developed 
pursuant to Federal environmental laws which pose significant 
compliance problems for small towns; identifying the means to improve 
the working relationship between the Environmental Protection Agency 
and small towns; reviewing proposed regulations for the protection of 
environmental and public health and suggesting revisions that could 
improve the ability of small towns to comply with such regulations; and 
identifying the means to promoting regionalization of environmental 
treatment systems and infrastructure serving small towns to improve the 
economic conditions of such systems and infrastructure.
    The meeting will be held at the Days Inn, located at 1201 K Street 
NW., Washington, DC 20005. The meeting will begin at 8 a.m. on March 
28th and conclude at 3:30 p.m. on March 29th.
    The Designated Federal Officer (DFO) for this Committee is 
Christine Zawlocki. She is the point of contact for information 
concerning any Committee matters and can be reached by calling (202) 
260-0244 or by writing to: U.S. EPA, 401 M Street SW. (1502), 
Washington, DC 20460.
    This is an open meeting and all interested persons are invited to 
attend. Meeting minutes will be available within thirty days after the 
meeting and can be obtained by written request from the DFO. Members of 
the public are requested to call the DFO at the above number if 
planning to attend so that arrangements can be made to comfortably 
accommodate attendees as much as possible.
Christine Zawlocki,
 Designated Federal Official, Office of Regional Operations and State/
Local Relations.
[FR Doc. 95-5277 Filed 3-2-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 42 (Friday, March 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 11971]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5016]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-5162-8]


Committee Meetings of the Grand Canyon Visibility Transport 
Commission

AGENCY: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) 
is announcing a meeting of the Public Advisory Committee (PAC) of the 
Grand Canyon Visibility Transport Commission (Commission).
    The PAC will meet from 10:00 a.m., MST on Thursday, March 9, to 
12:00 Noon on Saturday, March 11, at the Woodlands Plaza Hotel, 1175 
West Route 66, Flagstaff, Arizona. Activities on Thursday, March 9, 
will include a briefing on technical documents produced by the 
Commission's various committees, and a field trip to a visibility 
monitoring station at the Grand Canyon. Friday, March 10 and Saturday, 
March 11, will be devoted to a workshop during which the PAC will 
review the Commission's emissions inventory, emissions management 
scenarios, economic and demographic projections, and methodologies for 
assessing social, environmental, equity, and administrative impacts of 
emissions management scenarios.
    The Commission was established by the EPA on November 13, 1991 (see 
56 FR 57522, November 12, 1991). All meetings are open to the public. 
These meetings are not subject to provisions of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. John T. Leary, Project Manager for 
the Grand Canyon Visibility Transport Commission, Western Governor's 
Association, 600 17th Street, Suite 1705, South Tower, Denver, Colorado 
80202; telephone number (303) 623-9378; facsimile machine number (303) 
534-7309.


    Dated: February 23, 1995.
Mary D. Nichols,
Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. 95-5016 Filed 3-2-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
#### MARIE BARRETT v. JOHN T. WILLIAMS et al.

(Filed 18 September, 1940.)

Appeal by defendants from *Burney, J.,*at June Term, 1940, of Pasquotank.

Civil action in ejectment and for redemption and accounting.

From verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff, the defendants appeal, assigning errors.

*McMullan & McMullan for plaintiff, appellee.*

*M. B. Simpson and John H. Hall for defendants, appellants.*

*776Pee Curiam.

This is the same case that was before us on defendants’ appeal at the Spring Term, 1939, reported in 215 N. C., 131, 1 S. E. (2d), 366, and again on plaintiff’s appeal at the Spring Term, 1940, reported in 217 N. C., 175, 7 S. E. (2d), 383, new trials having been granted on the two former appeals, and is now before us on plaintiff’s second appeal.

A careful perusal of the record engenders the conclusion that the controverted matters have been tried in substantial conformity to the opinions heretofore rendered in the case. No sufficient reason has been advanced for disturbing the result appearing on the present record.

The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.
**OURTCF CtURr** **Cr****i-"*1**

### Qr.fl**nomberd causa** **oh o^tal** **&3nd frp** **rulimA^er4Dnatprovide nuptial** **4v\a\ 4Ve** **inlTaily as** **well as** **fvDM any** **vT& -ftr** **an s.** **!\J. t.** **L. T-V'5** **Tn tn** 

### of

### C\**T-V i6** **an**

### le**ho**

### LJ5l.

### XrA

### er**4-he fefyiAvewerks** **c*£*****Rule. 34.** 

### llorJ**eeelfH rvu-4rial** **-tawmupk anJ** **rviDfeon hearings** **ovs VJu^fee,** **-ki pursue** **wvecril rgful** **and adiequfcle** **o.t-V' fi** **am d-VTnov** **crp rjoKce** **perhnx rirTWU** **4Tl hasn** **ordeved-to nrAec** 

### irVve**CcuHs 4\tq4** **CR lqiU** **lecxc\ htA** **CO H-\i2** **CcnWru 4o** **perjuru**

### tt,**^^v pp** 

### 5vfir\ci**(WA^jpDr4€^4\ie4ranf£japfe(^ as** **ujeUa^-ih^ nar^Vr\al4Uci4erckdi** **as sudn** **^^ ^peUctk.TVocedure** **'bo. ICOC6)** **ar\d cor\7lfye** 

### a4nie**art! c£>ae<d- co^f** **csP AA^e.** 

### coctA?nh4bbe.WJ
_____________

No. 95-2942WM

_____________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Western

v. * District of Missouri.

*

Marc A. Beachem, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

_____________

Submitted: September 13, 1996

 Filed: September 19, 1996

_____________

Before FAGG, LAY, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

After drug enforcement agents observed Marc A. Beachem receiving a

sack of powdered cocaine and cocaine base from a drug courier named Michael

Leroy, Beachem pleaded guilty to attempting to possess cocaine with intent

to distribute, see 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846 (1994). Beachem appeals the

ninety-seven month sentence imposed by the district court. First, Beachem

contends the district court erroneously held him accountable for the 43.4

grams of cocaine base Leroy delivered to him. Beachem argues he did not

know and could not reasonably foresee that the sack he received from Leroy

contained cocaine base, because Leroy had never brought Beachem any cocaine

base during earlier drug deliveries. See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3(a)(1)(B) (1994).

We conclude the district court did not commit clear error in finding the

delivery of cocaine base was reasonably foreseeable, because the district

court heard evidence that Leroy and Beachem's regular supplier cooked

cocaine into cocaine base, Beachem communicated with the supplier before
-2-

each delivery, Beachem knew the types and amounts of drugs Leroy was

bringing during past deliveries, and Beachem once sold cocaine base to an

undercover informant. See United States v. Flores, 73 F.3d 826, 833 (8th

Cir.), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 2568 (1996). We also reject Beachem's

contention that the district court committed clear error in calculating the

amounts of powder cocaine and marijuana attributable to Beachem based on

his relevant conduct. See United States v. Lawrence, 915 F.2d 402, 406

(8th Cir. 1990). The district court's calculations are supported by

statements Leroy made to drug enforcement agents about earlier drug

deliveries, and the district court's determination that Leroy was credible

is virtually unreviewable on appeal. United States v. Adipietro, 983 F.2d

1468, 1472 (8th Cir. 1993). We thus affirm Beachem's sentence.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
1 Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-40809

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANTHONY CARMOUCHE,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:98-CR-149-1

-------------------- February 25, 2000

Before JONES, DUHÉ, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 1

Anthony Carmouche has appealed the sentence which he received

upon pleading guilty of possessing lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD)

with intent to distribute it. We AFFIRM.

Carmouche cont ends that the district court clearly erred by

attributing to him, as relevant conduct, a quanti ty of

methamphetamine which he possessed about 17 months prior to his

commission of the offense of conviction. The district court did

not err by crediting the uncontra dicted statement of the

confidential informant that he had regularly purchased LSD from

Carmouche during the two-year period preceding the date of theoffense of conviction. See United States v. Lokey , 945 F.2d 825,

839 (5th Cir. 1991). Carmouche’s methamphetamine possession was

relevant conduct because it was part of the same course of conduct,

i.e.

, his trafficking in controlled substances. S ee U.S.S.G.

§ 1B1.3(a)(2); United States v. Robins , 978 F.2d 881, 889-90 (5th

Cir. 1992).

Carmouche contends that the district court reversibly erred by

denying him sentencing credit for acceptance of responsibility, as

provided by U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1. The district court based its ruling

on findings that Carmouche had failed to truthfully admit the full

extent of his involvement in the offense of conviction; that he

falsely denied relevant conduct, i.e. , another sale of LSD; and

that Carmouche made false representations concerning a pistol which

was in a vehi cle where some of the negotiations occurred. These

findings are ampl y supported by the testimony of the undercover

officer at Carmouche’s sentencing hearing, which also corroborated

relevant information provided by the confidential informant. Such

misrepresentations disqualify a defendant from receiving credit for

a cceptance of responsibility. S ee United States v. Salinas

, 122

F.3d 5, 7 (5th Cir. 1997).

AFFIRMED.
Order entered August 21, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00864-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.H.V. AND P.J.V.C., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 301st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-13-00307

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s August 19, 2013 motion for an extension of time to file a brief 

TO THE EXTENT that appellant shall file her brief on or before September 20, 2013. We 

caution appellant that no further extension of time will be granted in this accelerated appeal 

absent extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
Order entered July 9, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00243-CV

COLLEEN MARIE FISHER, Appellant

V.

PAUL M. COOKE, SR., Appellee

On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-05882

ORDER

On May 13, 2021, we granted Susan E. Wright’s motion to withdraw as 

appellant’s counsel. At the time, the reporter’s record was due but had not been 

filed because appellant had not requested it. Accordingly, we directed appellant to 

provide written verification she had requested the reporter’s record. When 

appellant failed to respond by June 9, 2021, we ordered the appeal submitted 

without the reporter’s record and further ordered appellant to file her brief no later 

than July 9, 2021. 
Before the Court is appellant’s July 8, 2021 motion for a ninety-day 

extension of time to obtain new counsel and file her brief. Appellant explains she 

was unaware of the status of the appeal until June 9, when she called the Court to 

inquire about the reporter’s record. She learned at the time that the email address 

the Court had for her was incorrect. Appellant further states that she has made 

numerous attempts to contact the reporter about the record but has received no 

response. Attached to the motion as an exhibit is a copy of two email messages 

from appellant to the reporter concerning the record of hearings held July 1, 2020 

and September 17, 2020.

In light of the circumstances, we VACATE our June 9th order submitting 

the appeal without the reporter’s record and ordering appellant’s brief be filed. We 

ORDER Melba Wright, Official Court Reporter for the 191st Judicial District 

Court, to file, no later than August 2, 2021, either the reporter’s record of the July 

1 and September 17 hearings or written verification no record exists of those 

hearings. As appellant has filed a statement of inability to afford costs, and 

nothing before the record reflects appellant has been ordered to pay costs, any

record shall be filed without payment of costs. 

We DENY as premature appellant’s extension motion. Appellant’s brief 

shall be filed within thirty days of the filing of the reporter’s record.
We note appellant’s motion does not include the certificate of conference 

required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.1(a)(5). We caution that all 

future motions shall include the certificate.

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. 

Wright and the parties.

/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN

JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 37 (Friday, February 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 10383]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4507]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-80-001]


National Fuel Gas Supply Corp.; Notice of Compliance Filing

February 17, 1995.
    Take notice that on February 14, 1995, National Fuel Gas Supply 
Corporation (National) tendered worksheets in the above-captioned 
proceeding in compliance with the Letter Order issued by the Commission 
on December 30, 1994.
    National states that these worksheets clarify the interest 
calculations related to the flow through of refunds in National's 
Account Nos. 191 and 186 received from Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company 
and Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company. National further states 
that the National Fuel Customer Group has resolved its concerns.
    Any person desiring to protest said compliance filing should file a 
protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North 
Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C., 20426, in accordance with Rule 
211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.211). All such protest should be filed on or before February 27, 
1995. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-4507 Filed 2-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3606 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to eliminate the requirement to 

specify an effective period of a transfer of Post-9/11 educational assistance to a dependent, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2022 

Mr. TUBERVILLE (for himself, Mr. THUNE, Mr. RUBIO, and Mr. BRAUN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to eliminate the 

requirement to specify an effective period of a transfer 

of Post-9/11 educational assistance to a dependent, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF REQUIREMENT TO SPECIFY 

4 AN EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF A TRANSFER OF 

5 POST-9/11 EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE TO A 

6 DEPENDENT. 

7 Section 3319(e) of title 38, United States Code, is 

8 amended— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3606 IS

1 (1) in paragraph (1), by adding ‘‘and’’ after the 

2 semicolon; 

3 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘; and’’ and 

4 inserting a period; and 

5 (3) by striking paragraph (3). 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 40 (Wednesday, March 1, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 11118]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5008]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-30,113]


Philips Lighting Richmond, KY; Amended Certification Regarding 
Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on December 21, 1994, applicable 
to all workers of Philips Lighting in Richmond, Kentucky. The 
certification notice was published in the Federal Register on January 
4, 1994 (60 FR 481).
    At the request of the workers, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. New findings show that 
some workers were laid off just prior to the July 8, 1993 impact date 
set in the certification. The Department can go back to April 1, 1993 
in setting its impact date.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification by 
deleting the July 8, 1993 impact date and setting a new impact date of 
April 1, 1993.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers who were adversely affected by increased imports.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-30,113 is hereby issued as 
follows:

``All workers of Philips Lighting, Richmond, Kentucky who became 
totally or partially separated from employment on or after April 1, 
1993 are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 
223 of the Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed in Washington, D.C., this 22nd day of February 1995.
Victor J. Trunzo,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-5008 Filed 2-28-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 38 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 38

   To specify the Federal share of the costs of certain duty of the 
    National Guard in connection with the Coronavirus Disease 2019.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 25, 2021

  Mr. Leahy (for himself, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Durbin, Ms. Duckworth, Ms. 
Baldwin, Mr. Casey, Mr. Van Hollen, Ms. Hirono, Mr. Tester, Mr. Bennet, 
 Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Sanders, and Mr. Peters) introduced the following 
   bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To specify the Federal share of the costs of certain duty of the 
    National Guard in connection with the Coronavirus Disease 2019.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FEDERAL SHARE OF COSTS OF CERTAIN DUTY OF MEMBERS OF THE 
              NATIONAL GUARD IN CONNECTION WITH THE CORONAVIRUS DISEASE 
              2019.

    (a) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the costs of duty 
performed by members of the National Guard under section 502(f) of 
title 32, United States Code, for a mission assignment validated by the 
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) pursuant to a declaration 
specified in subsection (b) shall be 100 percent.
    (b) Declarations.--A declaration specified in this subsection is 
any declaration as follows:
            (1) A major disaster declared by the President under 
        section 401 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 
        Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170) with respect to the 
        Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).
            (2) An emergency declared by the President under section 
        501 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
        Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5191) with respect to the Coronavirus 
        Disease 2019.
            (3) A national emergency declared by the President under 
        the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) with 
        respect to the Coronavirus Disease 2019.
            (4) A public health emergency declared under section 319 of 
        the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d) with respect to 
        the Coronavirus Disease 2019.
                                 <all>
```