7750 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2016 / Notices 

1See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and 

Strip From India: Preliminary Results and Partial 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2013–2014, 80 FR 46957 (August 6, 2015) 

(Preliminary Results). 

2See Department Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and 

Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film From India; 2013– 

2014 Administrative Review’’ (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum), dated concurrently with, and 

hereby adopted by, this notice. 

3See Memorandum to the Record from Ron 

Lorentzen, Acting A/S for Enforcement & 

Compliance, regarding ‘‘Tolling of Administrative 

Deadlines as a Result of the Government Closure 

During Snowstorm Jonas,’’ dated January 27, 2016. 

4See Memoranda to Thomas Gilgunn, Program 

Manager ‘‘Analysis Memorandum for the Final 

Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review of Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, 

and Strip from India: Jindal Poly Films Limited, 

and ‘‘Analysis Memorandum for the Final Results 

of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip 

from India: SRF Limited,’’ both dated concurrently 

with these final results. 

5See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and 

Strip From India: Preliminary Results and Partial 

Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Review; 2013, 80 FR 46956 (August 3, 2015). See 

also Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and 

Strip from India: Final Results of Countervailing 

Duty Administrative Review; 2013 (signed February 

2, 2016). 

that Meridian’s trim kits are excluded 

from the scope of the Orders constitutes 

a final decision of that court that is not 

in harmony with the Department’s Final 

Scope Ruling on Refrigerator Trim Kits. 

This notice is published in fulfillment 

of the publication requirements of 

Timken. Accordingly, the Department 

will continue the suspension of 

liquidation of the trim kits at issue 

pending expiration of the period of 

appeal or, if appealed, pending a final 

and conclusive court decision. 

In accordance with the Courts 

instructions in Meridian IV, we 

determine that Meridian’s trim kits are 

excluded from the scope of the Orders 

as finished goods kits. 

Amended Final Determination 

Because there is now a final court 

decision with respect to the Final Scope 

Ruling on Refrigerator Trim Kits, the 

Department amends its final scope 

ruling. The Department finds that the 

scope of the Orders does not cover the 

products addressed in the Final Scope 

Ruling on Refrigerator Trim Kits. The 

Department will instruct U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (CBP) that the 

cash deposit rate will be zero percent for 

the refrigerator/freezer trim kits 

imported by Meridian. In the event that 

the CIT’s ruling is not appealed, or if 

appealed, upheld by the CAFC, the 

Department will instruct CBP to 

liquidate entries of Meridian’s 

Refrigerator Trim Kits without regard to 

antidumping and/or countervailing 

duties, and to lift suspension of 

liquidation of such entries. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with section 516A(c)(1) of 

the Act. 

Dated: February 8, 2016. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2016–02998 Filed 2–12–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–824] 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, 

Sheet, and Strip From India: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2013–2014 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: For the final results of the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty (AD) order on 

polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, 

and strip (PET Film) from India, we find 

that Jindal Poly Films Limited (Jindal) 

and the four-non selected respondents 

made sales of subject merchandise at 

less than normal value; we also find that 

SRF Limited (SRF) did not make sales 

of subject merchandise at less than 

normal value. The period of review is 

July 1, 2013, through June 30, 2014. 

DATES: Effective date: February 16, 2016. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Myrna Lobo or Alexander Cipolla, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office VII, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–2371 and (202) 482–4956, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 6, 2015, the Department of 

Commerce (the Department) published 

the Preliminary Results.1 For a history 

of events that have occurred since the 

Preliminary Results, see the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum.2 The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov, and is available to all 

parties in the Central Records Unit, 

Room B8024 of the main Department of 

Commerce building. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly on the Internet at http://

trade.gov/login.aspx. The signed Issues 

and Decision Memorandum and the 

electronic versions of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum are identical in 

content. 

As explained in the memorandum 

from the Acting Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement & Compliance, the 

Department has exercised its discretion 

to toll all administrative deadlines due 

to the recent closure of the Federal 

Government. All deadlines in this 

segment of the proceeding have been 

extended by four business days. The 

revised deadline for the final results of 

this review is now February 8, 2016.3

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the AD order 

are all gauges of raw, pretreated, or 

primed PET Film, whether extruded or 

coextruded. Excluded are metallized 

films and other finished films that have 

had at least one of their surfaces 

modified by the application of a 

performance-enhancing resinous or 

inorganic layer of more than 0.00001 

inches thick. Imports of PET Film are 

currently classifiable in the Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States 

(HTSUS) under item number 

3920.62.00.90. HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes. The written description of the 

scope of the AD order is dispositive. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case briefs are 

addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. A list of issues raised 

and to which we respond in the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum is attached 

to this notice as an Appendix. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on a review of the record and 

comments received from interested 

parties regarding our Preliminary 

Results, we have made changes to SRF’s 

and Jindal’s calculations.4 In addition, 

we have adjusted Jindal’s reported U.S. 

prices to account for changes in its 

export subsidies in the final results of 

the companion countervailing duty 

administrative review.5

Additionally, for companies not 

selected for individual review, we have 

assigned the rate calculated for Jindal in 

the final results of this review, in 

accordance with section 735(c)(5) of the 

Act. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2016 / Notices 7751 

6The Initiation Notice lists the company as Jindal 

Poly Films Limited of India. 

7See 19 CFR 351.212(b). 

8See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1). 

1See Antidumping Duty Order: Potassium 

Permanganate from the People’s Republic of China, 

49 FR 3897 (January 31, 1984). 

Final Results of Review 

As a result of our review, we 

determine the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist for the 

period July 1, 2013, through June 30, 

2014. 

Producer or exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Jindal Poly Films Limited 6 ... 0.59 

SRF Limited .......................... 0.00 

Ester Industries Limited ........ 0.59 

Garware Polyester Ltd .......... 0.59 

Polyplex Corporation Limited 0.59 

Vacmet .................................. 0.59 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), the 

Department determined, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise, in accordance with the 

final results of this review. The 

Department will issue assessment 

instructions to CBP 15 days after the 

date of publication of the final results of 

review. We will instruct CBP to 

liquidate entries of merchandise 

produced and/or exported by the 

aforementioned companies. The 

Department will calculate importerspecific assessment rates for Jindal. 

Where the respondent reported the 

entered value for its sales, the 

Department calculates importer-specific 

ad valorem assessment rates based on 

the ratio of the total amount of dumping 

calculated for the examined sales to the 

total entered value of those same sales.7

However, where the respondent did not 

report the entered value for its sales, the 

Department calculates importer-specific 

per-unit duty assessment rates. We will 

instruct CBP to apply an ad valorem 

assessment rate as indicated above to all 

entries of subject merchandise during 

the POR which were produced and/or 

exported by the four non-selected 

companies Ester Industries Limited, 

Garware Polyester Ltd, Polyplex 

Corporation Limited, and Vacmet. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate without 

regard to antidumping duties any 

entries produced and/or exported by 

SRF during the POR.8

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be effective for all shipments of 

PET Film from India entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review, as provided for 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rate for the company 

under review will be equal to the 

weighted-average dumping margin 

established in the final results of this 

review (except, if the rate is de minimis, 

i.e., less than 0.5 percent, then the cash 

deposit rate will be zero); (2) for 

previously reviewed or investigated 

companies not listed above, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published in the 

completed segment for the most recent 

period for that company; (3) if the 

exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, a prior review, or the less-thanfair-value investigation, but the 

manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate 

will be the rate established in the 

completed segment for the most recent 

period for the manufacturer of the 

merchandise; and (4) if neither the 

exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm 

covered in this or any other completed 

segment of this proceeding, then the 

cash deposit rate will be the all others 

rate for this proceeding, 5.71 percent. 

These deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Secretary’s presumption 

that reimbursement of antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of doubled antidumping 

duties. 

Notifications to Interested Parties 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

The Department is issuing and 

publishing these final results of 

administrative review in accordance 

with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of 

the Act. 

Dated: February 8, 2016. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

Scope of the Order 

III. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Whether To Exclude Certain 

Sales From the Margin Calculation 

Comment 2: Whether To Grant a Quantity 

Discount Adjustment to Jindal 

Comment 3: G&A Expense and Interest 

Expense Ratio 

Comment 4: Differential Pricing 

[FR Doc. 2016–03083 Filed 2–12–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–001] 

Potassium Permanganate From the 

People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Results of the 2014 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: In response to a request by 

Pacific Accelerator Limited (‘‘PAL’’), the 

Department of Commerce (the 

‘‘Department’’) is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty (‘‘AD’’) order on 

potassium permanganate from the 

People’s Republic of China (the ‘‘PRC’’) 

for the period of review (‘‘POR’’) 

January 1, 2014, through December 31, 

2014.1 The Department preliminarily 

determines that PAL sold subject 

merchandise in the United States at 

prices below normal value (‘‘NV’’) 

during the POR. If these preliminary 

results are adopted in the final results, 

the Department will instruct U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) 

to assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR. Interested 

parties are invited to comment on these 

preliminary results. 

DATES: Effective February 16, 2016. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul 

Walker or Javier Barrientos, AD/CVD 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES