alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1462, -1463, -1464, -1465

TAURUS IP, LLC (now known as Manufacturing System Technologies, LLC),

Plaintiff/Third Party DefendantAppellant,

and

ORION IP, LLC (now known as Clear With Computers LLC)

and ERICH SPANGENBERG,

Third Party Defendant-Appellants,

v.

DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, CHRYSLER FINANCIAL, LLC, and

DAIMLERCHRYSLER COMPANY, LLC,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

CHRYSLER HOLDING, LLC,

Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee,

and

MERCEDES-BENZ USA, INC. and CHRYSLER LLC,

Defendants/Third Party Plaintiffs-Cross

Appellants.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of

Wisconsin in case no. 07-CV-158, Chief Judge Barbara B. Crabb.
2008-1474, -1477

TAURUS IP, LLC (now known as Manufacturing System Technologies, LLC),

Defendant-Appellant,

v.

HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA,

Defendant-Cross Appellant,

and

REEBOK INTERNATIONAL, LTD.,

Defendant,

and

POLO RALPH LAUREN CORP.,

Defendant,

and

MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of

Wisconsin in case no. 07-CV-477, Chief Judge Barbara B. Crabb.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Taurus IP, LLC et al. move for an extension of time, until February 25, 2009, to

file their response/reply briefs.

The court notes that a court order recently extended the due date to February

25, 2009.

2008-1462, et al.	2
Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is moot.

FOR THE COURT

FEB 9 2009

/s/ Jan Horbalv

Date Jan Horbaly

Clerk FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

cc:	Kenneth C. Bass, III, Esq.

Elizabeth A. Wiley, Esq.

Mitchell G. Stockwell, Esq.

Gene C. Schaerr, Esq.

Barry J. Schindler, Esq.

s19

FEB 0 9 2009

Jitw dükbar

CLERK

2008-1462, et al.	3
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 0.55 0.61 15% 14%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

September 15, 2023

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable)

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: E1.8. Increase the payroll tax rate (currently 12.4 percent) by 0.1 percentage point 

each year from 2026-2031, until the rate reaches 13.0 percent for 2031 and later.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Daniel P. McGahn, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of American Superconductor Corporation;
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:
June 8, 2012



/s/ DANIEL P. MCGAHNDaniel P. McGahnChief Executive Officer
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 75th 

Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

-2.00% -4.34% 0.83% 2.25% -1.17% -2.09%

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable)

Proposed Provision: Increase the payroll tax rate (currently 12.4 percent) below the current-law taxable 

maximum to 12.7 percent in 2012, 13.0 percent in 2025, 13.3 in percent in 2040, 14.0 percent in 2060, 

14.5 percent in 2070, and 14.7 percent in 2080.

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this provision

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Cost rates with this provision

Income rates under present law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under present law

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Present law With this provision

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2009 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary, Social Security

January 28, 2010

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Cost rates with this provision

Income rates under present law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under present law

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Present law With this provision
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members         
    -  AEE Multimedia         
    -  AEE Research Library 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# PHOTOS ANDVIDEOS

Search

Search

                                - All Images 
                                - Other 
                                - Space Shuttle 

                                - Upload Date
                                - Photo Date
                                - Title

----

Download Image: Full Size (1.95 MB)

Tags:USSPACECOM, Global Sentinel

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
### Proposed Provision: B4.3. For the OASI and DI computation of the PIA, gradually reduce the maximum number of drop-out years from 5 to 0, phased in over the years 2025-2033.

back
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-2892

___________

Michael S. Griffis, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Western

* District of Arkansas.

Chuck Medford; Lt. Beth Reely; *

Jimmy Keeland; Michael Brown; * [UNPUBLISHED]

Pete Moss; Jack Gentry; Mark Lotta; *

Dr. Theresa Farrow; Dr. Donald Clay; *

Shelia M. Howerton; Regina Fox *

Jeffrey, Personal Representative of *

the Estate of George Jeffrey, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: October 14, 2009

 Filed: October 21, 2009

___________

Before BYE, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.
1

The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the

Honorable James R. Marschewski, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western

District of Arkansas. 

2

The remaining claims, concerning lockdown and a restraint chair, were

disposed of (in his favor) following a hearing. This ruling is not at issue on appeal.

-2-

Arkansas inmate Michael S. Griffis appeals the district court’s1

 adverse grant

of partial summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action.2

 The claims disposed of

in these rulings concerned Griffis’s allegations of poor housing conditions and

deficient medical care at the Carroll County Detention Center, where he spent almost

three years as a pretrial detainee. Having found no merit to the issues Griffis raises

on appeal, see Roe v. Crawford, 514 F.3d 789, 793 (8th Cir.) (standard of review),

cert. denied, 129 S. Ct. 109 (2008), we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
### Proposed Provision: B7.9. Beginning for newly eligible retired workers and spouses in 2030, all claimants who are married would receive a specified joint-and-survivor annuity benefit (i.e., surviving spouses would receive 75 percent of the decedents' benefits, in addition to their own) that would be payable if both were still alive. Initial benefits would be actuarially adjusted to keep the expected value of benefits equivalent to what would otherwise be current law.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 27 (Thursday, February 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7789]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3295]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation 337-TA-368]


Notice of Initial Determination Terminating Respondents on the 
Basis of Settlement Agreement

AGENCY: International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice is hereby given that the Commission has received an 
initial determination from the presiding officer in the above captioned 
investigation terminating the following respondents on the basis of a 
settlement agreement: Yuasa Corporation and Yuasa-Exide, Inc.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the Matter of Certain Rechargeable Nickel Metal Hydride Anode 
Materials and Batteries, and Products Containing Same.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This investigation is being conducted 
pursuant to section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337). 
Under the Commission's rules, the presiding officer's initial 
determination will become the determination of the Commission thirty 
(30) days after the date of its service upon the parties, unless the 
Commission orders review of the initial determination. The initial 
determination in this matter was served upon parties on February 6, 
1995.
    Copies of the initial determination, the settlement agreement, and 
all other nonconfidential documents filed in connection with this 
investigation are available for inspection during official business 
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are 
advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting 
the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810.

WRITTEN COMMENTS: Interested persons may file written comments with the 
Commission concerning termination of the aforementioned respondents. 
The original and 14 copies of all such documents must be filed with the 
Secretary to the Commission, 500 E Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 
20436, no later than 10 days after publication of this notice in the 
Federal Register. Any person desiring to submit a document (or portions 
thereof) to the Commission in confidence must request confidential 
treatment. Such requests should be directed to the Secretary to the 
Commission and must include a full statement of the reasons why 
confidential treatment should be granted. The Commission will either 
accept the submission in confidence or return it.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ruby J. Dionne, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Telephone (202) 205-
1802.

    Issued: February 3, 1995.

    By order of the Commission.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-3295 Filed 2-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 8650]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3704]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-87-002]

Cove Point LNG Limited Partnership; Notice of Tariff Filing

February 9, 1995.
    Take notice that on February 6, 1995, Cove Point LNG Limited 
Partnership, tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff Volume 
No. 1, Second Substitute Original Sheet No. 1 Superseding Substitute 
Original Sheet No. 1 and Original Sheet Nos. 2 through 11.
    Cove Point states that the tariff sheets have been filed pursuant 
to the Commission's January 5, 1995, Letter Order in the above-named 
proceeding and in compliance with Parts 154 and 284 SubPart B of the 
Commission's regulations. Cove Point states further that Second 
Substitute Original Sheet No. 1 removes the Annual Charge Adjustment 
and adds a provision for retainage which was contained in Original 
Sheet No. 1. Original Sheet Nos. 2 through 12 set forth the terms and 
conditions of Cove Point's Rate Schedule IT and provide information 
required by the Commission's Order.
    Any persons desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules of Regulations. All such protests should be filed on 
or before February 16, 1995. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this 
filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-3704 Filed 2-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
NUMBER 13-22-00039-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

 

IN RE ISMAEL GARZA

 

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

 

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Longoria

Order Per Curiam

On January 21, 2022, relator Ismael Garza filed a petition for writ of mandamus 

through which he asserts that the trial court abused its discretion by erroneously ordering 

the disclosure of privileged information. The Court requests that the real party in interest, 

H.E.B., LP, also named as H.E.B. Grocery Company, or any others whose interest would 

be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus 
2

on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.2, 52.4, 52.8.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed on the

25th day of January, 2022.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350(a) In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of USF Corporation for the year
ended December 31, 2004, I, Thomas E. Bergmann, Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of USF Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350(a), as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
that: (1) such Annual Report on Form l0-Q for the year ended December 31, 2004, fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of USF Corporation. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to USF
Corporation and will be retained by USF Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request. Date: March 14, 2005 /s/ Thomas E. Bergmann
Thomas E. Bergmann
Principal Executive Officer
and Principal Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6878

CHADWICK DEON ANDERSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN, Perry Corr. Inst.,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. 

J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (1:17-cv-02233-JMC)

Submitted: March 14, 2019 Decided: March 18, 2019

Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Chadwick Deon Anderson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Chadwick Deon Anderson seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 

(2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the 

merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 

336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner 

must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the 

petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 

484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Anderson has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny 

leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
**UNPUBLISHED**
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14-7139**

NATHANIEL SINGLETON, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.
FOOD SERVICE OFFICER MR. NELSON; FOOD SERVICE MR. TAYLOR; FOOD SERVICE MR. CRAZE; FOOD SERVICE MS. JOHNSON; FOOD SERVICE MS. VENTON; ADMINISTRATIVE FOOD SERVICE BROWN; ADMINISTRATIVE FOOD SERVICE ARGLINE, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken . R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (1:12-cv-02985-RBH)

Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 22, 2014

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nathaniel Singleton, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, Assistant U nited States Attorney , Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Nathaniel Singleton appeals the district court ’ s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denyin g relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court
. Singleton v. Nelson , No. 1:12

- cv - 02985

- RBH (D.S.C. July 24, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AF FIRMED
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual Balance 

in 75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

B

7

-1.70% -4.20% 0.22% 0.00% -1.48% 

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2008 Trustees Report Office of the Chief A

July 16, 2008

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Coverage of Employment

Proposed Provision: Cover newly hired State and local government employees beginning in 

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this 

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

0.02.04.06.08.0

10.012.014.016.018.020.0

2008 2018 2028 2038 2048 2058 2068 2078

Year

Percent

Cost rates with this provisionCost rates under present lawIncome rates with this provisionIncome rates under present law

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

 (assets as a percentage of annual expe

0

100200300400500600700800900

1000

2008 2018 2028 2038 2048 2058 

Year

Percent

Present law With this p
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and GraphsUpdated May 3, 2006   |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|

| Retirement Age | Description of Proposed Provision:      Eliminate the hiatus in the normal retirement age (speed up the increase to age 67) |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2005 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map |