alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5738 

Making supplemental appropriations for the Department of Homeland Security for purposes of establishing and maintaining mobile hospital units 

for responding to an epidemic, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 19, 2014 

Mr. BENTIVOLIO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Appropriations 

A BILL 

Making supplemental appropriations for the Department of 

Homeland Security for purposes of establishing and 

maintaining mobile hospital units for responding to an 

epidemic, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION FOR THE DE4 PARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY TO ES5 TABLISH MOBILE HOSPITAL UNITS FOR COM6 BATING EPIDEMICS. 

7 There is hereby appropriated to the Department of 

8 Homeland Security, out of any money in the Treasury not 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5738 IH

1 otherwise appropriated, for an additional amount for the 

2 purpose to establish and maintain mobile hospital units 

3 as a preparation for responding to a possible epidemic, 

4 $5,000,000,000, to remain available until expended. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 23.1  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM  We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8
of HF Financial Corp., pertaining to the HF Financial Corp. 2002 Stock Option
and Incentive Plan, the 1991 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, the 1996 Director
Restricted Stock Plan, and the Retirement Savings Plan of our report dated September 26,
2008, accompanying the consolidated financial statements included in the Form 10-K
Annual Report of HF Financial Corp. for the fiscal year ended June 30,
2008.   /s/ Eide Bailly, LLP  Sioux
Falls, South Dakota September 26,
2008
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form
10-K of Lincare Holdings Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December
31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, John P. Byrnes, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



(1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and



(2) information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.





By:
    
    /s/    JOHN P.
      BYRNESJohn P. Byrnes
      Chief Executive
  Officer




March 15, 2004
#### STATE v. VERNON ESTER

(Filed 30 October, 1957)

Appeal by defendant from *Armstrong, J.,*August Term 1957 of Wilkes.

The defendant was tried upon three bills of indictment which were consolidated for the purpose of trial. One bill of indictment, No. 139, charged that Vernon Ester on 15 April 1957 did unlawfully, willfully, and feloniously carnally know and abuse Emma Jean Ester, a female child over twelve years and under sixteen years of age, who had never before had sexual intercourse with any person, he being a male person over eighteen years of age. The other two bills of indictment were numbered 139-A and 139-B.

It was charged in bill No. 139-A that Vernon Ester on the 15th day of April 1957, and in bill No. 139-B that Vernon Ester on the 18th day of April 1957, did unlawfully, willfully, and feloniously have carnal intercourse with Emma Jean Ester, his daughter, knowing at the time that the relationship of father and daughter existed.

The State and the defendant offered evidence. It is disclosed by the State’s evidence that Emma Jean Ester was born out of wedlock and that the defendant later married her mother. The evidence also tends to show that the defendant had claimed to be her father.

The jury returned a verdict of guilty as to the crime of carnal knowledge of a female child as charged in bill of indictment No. 139, but not guilty of incest as charged in bills of indictment No. 139-A and No. 139-B.

From the judgment imposed, the defendant appeals, assigning error.

*Attorney General Patton, Assistant Attorney General Mc-Galliard, for the State.*

*Larry S. Moore, for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

We have carefully considered the evidence disclosed by the record, and it was amply sufficient to take the case to the jury on the charge contained in the bill of indictment designated No. 139.

We have also carefully examined each exception and assignment of error, and reached the conclusion that they fail to point out prejudicial error. Hence, the verdict and judgment of the court below will not be disturbed.

No error.
### Proposed Provision: E1.9. Increase the payroll tax rate (currently 12.4 percent) by 0.1 percentage point each year from 2027-2050, until the rate reaches 14.8 percent in 2050 and later.

back
#### VARINA D. CHESHIRE v. BEN JACKSON and MARGARET JACKSON.

(Filed 22 February, 1933.)

Limitation of Actions B b—

A cause of action for tbe reformation of a deed for mutual mistake does not accrue until tbe mistake is discovered or should bave been discovered in tbe exercise of ordinary care. C. S., 441(9).

Appeal by defendants from *Parker, J.,*at December Term, 1932, of Chowan.

No error.

Tbis is an action to reform a deed by wbicb tbe plaintiff conveyed tbe land described therein to tbe defendants. Tbe deed was executed on 10 November, 1919.

It is alleged in tbe complaint tbat by tbe mutual mistake of tbe parties tbe description in tbe deed includes land wbicb tbe plaintiff did not sell, and wbicb tbe defendants did not buy, and tbat tbe mistake was not discovered by tbe plaintiff until some time in August, 1931. Tbe plaintiff prays tbat tbe description in tbe deed be corrected, so tbat only tbe land wbicb tbe plaintiff sold, and wbicb tbe defendants bought, shall be included therein.

Tbe allegations of tbe complaint with respect to tbe mutual mistake of tbe parties are denied in tbe answer. Tbe action was begun on 10 October, 1931. Tbe defendants in their answer plead tbe three-year statute of limitations in bar of plaintiff’s recovery.

There was evidence at tbe trial sufficient to sustain tbe allegations of tbe complaint.

Tbe issues submitted to tbe jury were answered in accordance with tbe contentions of tbe plaintiff.

From judgment on tbe verdict, tbe defendants appealed to tbe Supreme Court.

*B. G. Holland for plaintiff.*

*P. H. Bell for defendants.*

Per Curiam.

Tbe cause of action alleged in tbe complaint, and supported by the evidence at tbe trial, did not accrue until tbe mistake in *774tbe description of tbe land conveyed by tbe deed was discovered by tbe plaintiff, or at least until sucb.mistake should bave been discovered by ber in tbe exercise of ordinary care, C. S., 441(9), *Sinclair v. Teal,*156 N. C., 458, 72 S. E., 487. Tbe statute of limitations did not begin to run against tbe plaintiff until some time in August, 1931. Tbe action was begun on 10 October, 1931.

There was no error in tbe refusal of tbe trial court to dismiss tbe action by judgment as of nonsuit. Tbe judgment is affirmed.

No error.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM APPLICABLE
1996 INTERIM  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF CELLULAR  COMMUNICATIONS  OF PUERTO RICO,
INC. THE  SCHEDULE IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                   JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                     MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                            10,373,000
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     21,442,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (3,227,000)
<INVENTORY>                                        3,825,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   1,498,000
<PP&E>                                           106,663,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (28,567,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   278,932,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             21,887,000
<BONDS>                                           90,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                             136,000
<OTHER-SE>                                       166,909,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     278,932,000
<SALES>                                            2,963,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  31,476,000
<CGS>                                              4,680,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      8,565,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  13,647,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 1,779,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    3,015,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (1,726,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                1,289,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                       1,289,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           0.10<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0.09<F1>

<FN>
<F1>RESTATED TO REFLECT THE ADOPTION OF STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
    STANDARDS NO.128, "EARNINGS PER SHARE"
</FN>

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 8438]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3593]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Declaration of Disaster Loan Area, North Carolina

    Duplin, Lenoir, and Sampson Counties and the contiguous Counties of 
Bladen, Crave, Cumberland, Greene, Harnett, Johnston, Jones, Onslow, 
Pender, Pitt, and Wayne in the State of North Carolina constitute a 
disaster area as a result of damages caused by severe storms and 
tornadoes which occurred on January 6 and 7, 1995. Applications for 
loans for physical damage may be filed until the close of business on 
April 10, 1995 and for economic injury until the close of business on 
November 8, 1994 at the address listed below: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Disaster Area 2 Office, One Baltimore Place, Suite 300, 
Atlanta, GA 30308, or other locally announced locations.
    The interest rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For physical damage:                                                    
  Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere..................     8.000
  Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere...............     4.000
  Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere..................     8.000
  Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit                
   Available Elsewhere........................................     4.000
  Others (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit               
   Available Elsewhere........................................     7.125
For Economic Injury:                                                    
  Businesses and Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without                
   Credit Available Elsewhere.................................     4.000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 276412 
and for economic injury the number is 844400.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: February 8, 1995.
Philip Lader,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 95-3593 Filed 2-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9717]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4211]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Intent To Rule on Application Use the Revenues From a Passenger 
Facility Charge (PFC) at Albany County Airport, Albany, NY

agency: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

action: Notice of intent to rule on application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

summary: The FAA proposes to rule and invites public comment on the 
application to use the revenues from a PFC at Albany County Airport 
under the provisions of the Aviation Safety and Capacity Expansion Act 
of 1990 (Title IX of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990) 
(Public Law 101-508) and Part 158 of the Federal Aviation Regulations 
(14 CFR Part 158).

dates: Comments must be received on or before March 23, 1995.

addresses: Comments on this application may be mailed or delivered in 
triplicate to the FAA at the following address: Mr. Philip Brito, 
Manager New York Airports District Office, 181 South Franklin Avenue, 
Room 305, Valley Stream, New York 11581.
    In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be 
mailed or delivered to Michael N. Polovina, Director of the Albany 
County Airport, at the following address: Albany County Airport, ARFF 
Building, 2nd. Floor, Albany, New York 12211.
    Air carriers and foreign air carriers may submit copies of written 
comments previously provided to the County of Albany under section 
158.23 of Part 158.

for further information contact: Mr. Philip Brito, Manager of the New 
York Airports District Office, 181 South Franklin Avenue, Room 305, 
Valley Stream, New York, 11581, Tel. (718) 553-18182. The application 
may be reviewed in person at this same location.

supplementary information: The FAA proposes to rule and invites public 
comment on the application to use the revenues from a PFC at Albany 
County Airport under the provisions of the Aviation Safety and Capacity 
Expansion Act of 1990 (Title IX of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation 
Act. Any person may inspect the application in person at the FAA office 
listed above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT and at the FAA 
regional Airports office located at: Fitzgerald Federal Building, John 
F. Kennedy International Airport, Jamaica, New York 11430.
    In addition, any person may, upon request, inspect the application, 
notice and other documents germane to the application in person at the 
Albany County Airport.

    Issued in Jamaica, New York State on February 1, 1995.
Anthony P. Spera,
Acting Manager, Airports Division, Eastern Region.
[FR Doc. 95-4211 Filed 2-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3821 

Making appropriations to provide emergency assistance for the Community 

Development Fund for disaster response and recovery for the fiscal 

year ending September 30, 2022. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 10 (legislative day, MARCH 7), 2022 

Mr. SCHATZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Appropriations 

A BILL 

Making appropriations to provide emergency assistance for 

the Community Development Fund for disaster response 

and recovery for the fiscal year ending September 30, 

2022. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 The following sums are appropriated, out of any 

4 money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the 

5 fiscal year ending September 30, 2022, and for other pur6 poses, namely: 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3821 IS

1 DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN 

2 DEVELOPMENT 

3 COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT

4 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUND

5 For an additional amount for ‘‘Community Develop6 ment Fund’’, $2,000,000,000, to remain available until 

7 expended, which shall be allocated and used under the 

8 same authority and conditions as the additional appropria9 tions for fiscal year 2022 for ‘‘Department of Housing and 

10 Urban Development—Community Planning and Develop11 ment—Community Development Fund’’ in title VIII of di12 vision B of the Extending Government Funding and Deliv13 ering Emergency Assistance Act (Public Law 117–43): 

14 Provided, That up to $5,000,000 of the amounts provided 

15 under this heading in this Act may be used for capacity 

16 building, technical assistance, and necessary costs of ad17 ministering funds under the heading ‘‘Community Devel18 opment Fund’’ in this Act or any prior or future Act that 

19 makes amounts available for purposes related to major 

20 disasters under such heading: Provided further, That, after 

21 funds are allocated to the most impacted and distressed 

22 areas resulting from major disasters in 2020 and 2021, 

23 remaining amounts may be used for 2022 disasters under 

24 such same authority and conditions: Provided further, 

25 That such amount is designated by the Congress as being 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3821 IS

1 for an emergency requirement pursuant to section 

2 4001(a)(1) and section 4001(b) of S. Con. Res. 14 (117th 

3 Congress), the concurrent resolution on the budget for fis4 cal year 2022. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### VIRGINIA SIMMS LLOYD (and MOTORS INSURANCE CORPORATION) v. PHILLIP GREENBERG.

(Filed 20 May, 1959.)

.Appeal hy defendant from *McKinnon, J.,*October Term, 1958, of Dueham.

Civil action instituted by Virginia Simms Lloyd, referred to herein as plaintiff, growing out of a collision that occurred November 2, 1954, on N. C. Highway 49 near its intersection with N. C. Highway 73, approximately nine miles south of Concord, N. C., between a Cadillac oar, operated by defendant, and a Pontiac car, owned and operated by plaintiff, resulting in personal injury to plaintiff and damage to her car.

The cars were proceeding on Highway 49, in the same direction, southeast towards Charlotte, N. C. The Cadillac struck the rear of the Pontiac.

Prior to trial, Motors Insurance Corporation, plaintiff’s collision insurance carrier, was made a party because of its interest in plaintiff’s -claim for damages to her oar.

The court overruled defendant’s motions for judgment of nonsuit. *375Issues raised .by the pleadings were submitted to the jury. The jury answered the (first) negligence issue, “Yes,” and answered the (second) contributory negligence issue, “No.” Answering separate issues, the jury awarded (third issue) $10,000.00 on account of plaintiff’s personal injuries and awarded (fourth issue) $478.00 on account of the damage to her car.

It appears that plaintiff “stipulated and agreed in open court at the time of the hearing (of defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict) to a reduction in the damages under the third issue to the sum of $8,000.00.”

The court entered judgment (1) that plaintiff have and recover of defendant the sum of $8,000.00 damages for personal injuries, and (2) that plaintiff have and recover of defendant $478.00 as damages to her car, with provisions defining the respective interests of plaintiff and Motors Insurance Corporation in said $478.00, and (3) that defendant pay the costs.

Defendant excepted and appealed, assigning errors.

*James R. Farlow and Victor S. Bryant, Jr., for plaintiffs, appellees.*

*Daniel K. Ediuards and Robinson 0. Everett for defendant, appellant.*

Per Curiam.

The conclusion reached is that the evidence, when considered in the light most favorable to plaintiff, presented a case for jury determination on the issues ‘submitted. Moreover, consideration of the assignments of error brought forward and discussed in appellant’s brief fails to disclose any error of law deemed of sufficient prejudicial effect to warrant a new trial. As to the reduction of the verdict on the third issue, with plaintiff’s consent, see *Caudle v. Swanson,*248 N.C. 249, 103 S.E. 2d 357, and cases cited.

No Error.
ADDENDUM NO. FOUR TO EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT 


 


This Addendum
Number Four (this “Addendum”) to the Employment Agreement dated April 17, 2020, as amended as of October 15,
2020, April 15, 2021 and March 15, 2022 (the “Employment Agreement”) that was entered into by and between IMMUNIC,
INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and DUANE NASH (the “Executive”),
is entered into as of December 28, 2022. Defined terms used, but not defined, herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Employment
Agreement.


 


WHEREAS, the
Executive agreed to serve in the capacity of Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company (“Board”),
pursuant to the terms of the Employment Agreement, until December 31, 2022 or such later date as shall be mutually agreed to in writing
by the Executive and the Company; and


 


WHEREAS, the
Executive and the Company have agreed to extend the term of the Executive’s service as the Executive Chairman of the Board until
December 31, 2023 subject to the terms of the Employment Agreement.


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants contained herein, and for other valuable consideration, the Company and the Executive
hereby agree as follows:


 


1.       Term
of Employment. The Company and the Executive hereby agree to extend the Term of Employment from December 31, 2022 to December 31,
2023 with a Base Salary of $30,250 per month (which includes the cash retainer payable for serving on the Company’s Board or for
acting as the Chairman of the Board). All other terms of the Employment Agreement shall remain the same and Section 12 (Miscellaneous)
of the Employment Agreement is deemed incorporated herein to this Addendum.


 


IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Addendum to be executed as of the 28th day of December 2022.


  


	 	IMMUNIC, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/ Daniel Vitt 
	 	Name: 	Daniel Vitt
	 	Title: 	Chief Executive Officer
	 	 	 
	 	EXECUTIVE
	 	 	 
	 	/s/ Duane Nash
	 	Duane Nash
EXHIBIT 23.3



[LETTERHEAD OF MILLER AND LENTS, LTD. APPEARS HERE]



March 11, 2004



Cross Timbers Royalty Trust

P.O. Box 830650

Dallas, TX 75283-0650



| | Re: |  | Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
| | --- |  | ---------------------------

| |  |  | 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K
| |  |  | -------------------------------



Gentlemen:



The firm of Miller and Lents, Ltd., consents to the use of its name and to the use of its report dated March 11, 2004, regarding the Cross Timbers
Royalty Trust Proved Reserves and Future Net Revenues as of December 31, 2003, in the 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K.



Miller and Lents, Ltd., has no interests in Cross Timbers Royalty Trust or in any affiliated companies or subsidiaries and is not to receive any such
interest as payment for such reports and has no director, officer, or employee otherwise connected with Cross Timbers Royalty Trust. We are not employed by Cross Timbers Royalty Trust on a contingent basis.



Yours very truly,  MILLER AND LENTS, LTD.By:

/s/ JAMES PEARSONJames Pearson Chairman