alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
knwn_ex101.htm

EXHIBIT 10.1
  
 AMENDMENT NO. 8 TO
 CONVERTIBLE REDEEMABLE PROMISSORY NOTE 
 DATED JANUARY 31, 2018
  
 This AMENDMENT NO. 8 TO CONVERTIBLE REDEEMABLE PROMISSORY NOTE dated JANUARY 31, 2018 in the principal amount of US$519,833 (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of December 7, 2022, by and between J3E2A2Z LP (the “Holder”), and Know Labs, Inc., a Nevada corporation f/k/a Visualant, Incorporated (the “Company”).
  
 RECITALS
  
 WHEREAS, the Company is a party to that certain Convertible Redeemable Promissory Note dated January 31, 2018 as amended (as so amended, the “Debenture”), payable to Holder (capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings set forth in the Debenture);
  
 WHEREAS, the Promissory Note currently has a Maturity Date of September 30, 2022; and
  
 WHEREAS, the Holder and the Company wish to amend the Promissory Note to extend the Maturity Date;
  
 AGREEMENT
  
 Now, therefore, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree to the following.
  
 1. Amendment of Maturity Date. The Maturity Date of the Debenture is hereby amended to January 30, 2023.
  
 2. Effect of Amendment.The parties hereto agree that the amendments described above are effective retroactively to September 30, 2022. Except as specifically set forth in this Amendment, the terms of the Debenture remain in full force and effect.
  
 3. Interest Rate. The interest rate remains 6%.
  
 4. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in two (2) or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. Counterparts may be delivered via facsimile, electronic mail (including pdf or any electronic signature complying with the U.S. federal ESIGN Act of 2000, e.g., www.docusign.com) or other transmission method and any counterpart so delivered shall be deemed to have been duly and validly delivered and be valid and effective for all purposes.
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.
  
 (signature page follows)
  
 	 
	 1

	

	 

  
 	 Company: 
	 	Holder:	 
	 KNOW LABS, INC.
	 	J3E2A2Z LP	 
	 By:
	/s/ Phillip A. Bosua	 	By:	/s/ Ronald P. Erickson	 
	 Name: 
	Phillip A. Bosua	 	Name: 	Ronald P. Erickson	 
	 Title: 
	 Chief Executive Officer
	  
	 Title: 
	 Manager
	  


  
 	 
	 2
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Level of Monthly Benefits (PIA) | Description of Proposed Provision:      Reduce benefits by 3 percent for those newly eligible for benefits in 2010 and later. |
|---------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2009 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified August 26, 2009 |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         912,164
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,840
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               914,004
<PP&E>                                      61,100,449
<DEPRECIATION>                              28,095,115
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              33,919,338
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          914,004
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  33,005,334
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                33,919,338
<SALES>                                      6,691,336
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,702,434
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               152,631
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,549,803
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,549,803
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,549,803
<EPS-BASIC>                                      1.092
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.092


</TABLE>
## Summary Measures and Graphs

- Individual Provisions
- Coverage of Employment or Earnings, or Inclusion of Other Sources of Revenue

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						F6: Apply a separate 6.2 percent tax on investment income as defined in the Affordable Care Act (ACA), with unindexed thresholds as in the ACA ($200,000 for single filer, $250,000 for married filing jointly), starting in 2025. Proceeds go to the OASI and DI Trust Funds.**

|  |  |
|--|--|
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-13-00099-CR 

CLYDE GARNETT LAND, III, APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

 

On Appeal from the 242nd District Court 

Hale County, Texas 

Trial Court No. B17581-0803, Honorable Edward Lee Self, Presiding 

 

December 5, 2013 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. 

Clyde Garnett Land, III, appellant, was charged with theft, a state jail felony and, 

after pleading guilty, was sentenced to twelve months in a state jail facility. His 

sentence was suspended, and appellant was placed on community supervision for four 

years. Subsequently, the State filed a motion to revoke appellant’s community 

supervision which motion was dismissed when appellant became current on his fees. 

The State, later, sought to have appellant’s probation revoked on other grounds. The 

court granted the motion and sentenced appellant to twelve months in a state jail facility.
2

Appellant’s counsel has filed a motion to withdraw, together with an Anders1

brief, wherein he certifies that, after diligently searching the record, the appeal is without 

merit. Along with his brief, he has filed a copy of a letter sent to appellant informing him 

of counsel’s belief that there was no reversible error and of appellant’s right to appeal 

pro se. By letter, this court also notified appellant of his right to file his own brief or 

response by November 15, 2013, if he wished to do so. Appellant filed a response 

wherein he generally stated he has grounds to pursue the appeal, however, he 

mentioned none. 

In compliance with the principles enunciated in Anders, appellate counsel 

discussed potential areas for appeal which included the sufficiency of the evidence to 

revoke probation, and the propriety of the sentence assessed. However, he then 

explained why the issues lacked merit. 

In addition, we conducted our own review of the record to assess the accuracy of 

counsel’s conclusions and to uncover arguable error pursuant to In re Schulman, 252 

S.W.3d 403 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) and Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 508 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 1991). After doing so, we concurred with counsel’s conclusions. 

Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is granted and the judgment is affirmed.2

Brian Quinn 

Chief Justice

Do not publish. 

 

1

See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744-45, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). 

2

Appellant has the right to file a petition for discretionary review with the Court of Criminal 

Appeals.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

Cross Timbers Royalty Trust 

Dallas, Texas: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement No. 33-55784 on Form S-8 and RegistrationStatement No. 333-91460 on Form S-8 of XTO Energy Inc. of our reports dated March 16, 2006, with respect to the statements of assets, liabilities and trust corpus of Cross Timbers Royalty Trust as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, andthe related statements of distributable income and changes in trust corpus for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, the trustee’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reportingas of December 31, 2005 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, which reports appear in the December 31, 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cross Timbers Royalty Trust. 

 

KPMG LLP 

 

Dallas, Texas 

March 16, 2006
#### J. K. STOVER v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and C. W. SAILOR.

(Filed 18 September, 1935.)

1. Railroads D c — Contributory negligence of person struck and injured while on track held to bar recovery against railroad.

Where a person is in full possession of his faculties and, while waiting, standing, or arising from a sitting position on the track, is struck by a locomotive, and there is no indication that he is helpless upon the track, the contributory negligence of such person will bar recovery for injuries sustained by him although the locomotive is negligently operated, and, *496the engineer having the right to assume up to the last moment that he would step from the track, the doctrine of last clear chance has no application.

2. Negligence B b—

The doctrine of last clear chance is not applicable when the contributory negligence of the person injured continues up to the moment of the accident resulting in the injury.

Appeal by plaintiff from judgment of nonsuit entered by *Rousseau, J.,*at January Term, 1935, of Cherokee.

Affirmed.

*Moody & Moody for plaintiff, appellcmt.*

*R. G. Kelly and Jones & Ward for defendants, appellees.*

Per Curiam.

This action was instituted by the plaintiff to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been proximately caused by negligence of the defendants. The defendant Sailor was an engineer operating a locomotive of the defendant railway company. The plaintiff was on the railway tracks of the corporate defendant, and his leg was so injured by said locomotive as to require amputation. According to the plaintiff’s allegations and evidence, he was either walking on the track, or standing on the track, or rising from a sitting position he had assumed on the track to read a letter, at the time he was stricken by said locomotive. He was in the full possession of all his faculties unimpaired, his sight, his hearing, and his power of locomotion.

Even if it he conceded that the defendants were negligent in the operation of the locomotive, it clearly appears that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence which continued up to the moment of the impact, and that the doctrine of “the last clear chance,” urged in the' argument and brief of the plaintiff, is not applicable. The plaintiff was not only in possession of all of his faculties, hut did nothing to put the defendants on notice that he could not or would not get out of the way of the oncoming engine, or to render apparent that he was in any danger. The defendants had a right to assume up to the last moment, that the plaintiff would step from the railway track. See *Redmon v. R. R.,*195 N. C., 164, and cases there cited, and the more recent case of *Rives v. R. R.,*203 N. C., 227.

The judgment as of nonsuit at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence was properly entered.

Affirmed.
## Summary Measures and Graphs

- Individual Provisions
- Level of Monthly Benefits

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						B5.7: Beginning for those newly eligible in 2026, reconfigure the special minimum benefit: (a) The number of years of work (YOWs) is determined as total quarters of coverage divided by 4, ignoring any fraction. Childcare years are granted to parents who have a child under 6, with a limit of 5 such years. (b) At implementation, set the PIA for 30+ YOWs equal to 100 percent of the monthly HHS poverty level for the year prior to eligibility. For workers between 11 and 29 YOWs, reduce the special minimum by 3 1/3 percentage points per YOW so that at 29 YOWs the minimum would be 96 2/3% of poverty, ..., down to 11 YOWs at 36 2/3% of poverty. No minimum for 10 or fewer YOWs.**

|  |  |
|--|--|
**Exhibit 32.1**
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), theundersigned officer of Activant Solutions Inc., a Delaware corporation (the“Company”), does hereby certify that, to the best of such officer’s knowledge(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2004(the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Activant Solutions Inc. and will be retained by Activant SolutionsInc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.
By:   /s/ MICHAEL A. AVILES 05/17/04   Michael A. Aviles DateChairman of the Board,  President and Chief Executive Officer
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 75th 

Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

-2.00% -4.34% 0.40% 1.20% -1.60% -3.14%

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Retirement Age

Proposed Provision: Index benefits to longevity after the normal retirement age (NRA) reaches age 67 

under current law. Under current law, the NRA reaches 67 for individuals who attain age 62 in 2022 and 

later. Under this provision, the NRA would be further increased by one month for those attaining age 62 

in every other year after 2022.

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this provision

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Cost rates with this provision

Income rates under present law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under present law

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Present law With this provision

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2009 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary, Social Security

November 16, 2009

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Cost rates with this provision

Income rates under present law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under present law

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Present law With this provision
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

I, Lewis J. Derbes, Jr., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Conrad Industries, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared; 

 

b) [intentionally omitted]

 

c) evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

d) disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 12, 2003.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 240 (Thursday, December 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 64154]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30412]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Agency Form Under Review by the Office of Management and Budget

    DOC has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for 
clearance the following proposal for collection of information under 
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
    Agency: Bureau of the Census.
    Title: National Employers Survey II.
    Form Number(s): None. Automated survey instrument.
    Agency Approval Number: 0607-0787.
    Type of Request: Reinstatement, with change, of a previously 
approved collection for which approval has expired.
    Burden: 600 hours.
    Number of Respondents: 3,000
    Avg Hours Per Response: 12 minutes.
    Needs and Uses: The Bureau of the Census plans to conduct a follow-
up to the National Employers Survey (NES) (originally titled the 
National Training Survey) which was conducted in the Fall of 1994. The 
NES provided a baseline of information about how employment, training, 
and hiring practices affect and promote a skilled and proficient 
workforce. Results were enthusiastically welcomed and accepted by 
government, business, and academia as filling a need for information on 
employment, training, and hiring practices and policies. The NES II is 
a short follow-up survey directed to the original NES respondents to 
clarify, confirm, and amplify the results of the original survey, as 
well as address some points raised by those results. Employers will use 
the results of the NES, augmented with this follow-up information, to 
formulate employment practices and policies. Government will use the 
results in legislative and policy-making decisions.
    Affected Public: Businesses or other for-profit organizations.
    Frequency: One time.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: Maria Gonzalez, (202) 395-7313.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Gerald Tache, DOC Forms Clearance Officer, (202) 
482-3271, Department of Commerce, room 5312, 14th and Constitution 
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to Maria Gonzalez, OMB Desk Officer, room 10201, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.

    Dated: December 8, 1995.
Gerald Tache,
Departmental Forms Clearance Officer, Office of Management and 
Organization.
[FR Doc. 95-30412 Filed 12-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-07-F
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1998   
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1998   
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-1998   
<CASH>                                        1,606,119     
<SECURITIES>                                  0             
<RECEIVABLES>                                 896,690       
<ALLOWANCES>                                  2,144         
<INVENTORY>                                   505,911       
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              210,533       
<PP&E>                                        10,004,330    
<DEPRECIATION>                                2,405,427     
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                11,376,780    
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         2,053,609     
<BONDS>                                       0             
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0             
<PREFERRED>                                   0             
<COMMON>                                      8,238,009     
<OTHER-SE>                                    11,376,780    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  146,962       
<SALES>                                       10,187,645    
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              11,066,734    
<CGS>                                         4,150,851     
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 5,411,170     
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (879,089)      
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0             
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            516,597       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               0             
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0             
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           625,624       
<DISCONTINUED>                                0             
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0             
<CHANGES>                                     0             
<NET-INCOME>                                  988,116       
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 0.57          
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0             
                                              


</TABLE>