alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           7,505
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   77,562
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,694
<INVENTORY>                                      7,467
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               118,456
<PP&E>                                          25,130
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,502
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 371,824
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          159,975
<BONDS>                                         85,192
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           359
<OTHER-SE>                                      96,944
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   371,824
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               713,184
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  255,101
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               429,447
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,544
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,953
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,023
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,930
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,930
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 21.01


<TABLE>
Subsidiary of the Registrant and Related Subsidiaries




<CAPTION>

                                                                     State of
                                                                     Incorporation or
Parent Organization                 Subsidiary                       Ownership

<S>                                 <C>                    <C>       <C>

ALBANK Financial Corporation        ALBANK, FSB            100%      New York

ALBANK, FSB                         ALVEST FINANCIAL       100%      New York
                                    SERVICES, INC.

ALBANK, FSB                         ASBANY CORP.           100%      New York

ALBANK, FSB                         ASBANY FUNDING CORP.   100%      New York

ASBANY CORP.                        CDC-ASBANY CORP.       100%      New York

ASBANY CORP.                        GABLES CVF, INC.       100%      Nebraska

ASBANY CORP.                        PAGE-ASBANY CORP.      100%      New York

</TABLE>
## NO. 12

- 17

- 00386

- CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN RE:
VICTOR VEGA,

RELATOR §
§
§ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM Victor Vega, an inmate acting pro se, has filed an original proceeding i n which he complains of the trial court’s failure to file findings of fact and conclusions of law

. Generally, a party seeking mandamus relief must bring forward all that is necessary to establish his claim for
mandamus relief. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52. This entails filing an appendix and record as part of the petition. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.3(k), 52.7. The contents of both are prescribed by the rules of appellate procedure. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.3(k), 52.7(a). On December 7, 2017, this Court notified Vega that his petition fails to comply with Rules 52.3(k) and 52.7. This Court informed Vega that the petition would be referred to the Court for dismissal unless the appendix and record were provided by December 18. In response, Vega maintains that the Appe ndix requirement may be “satisfied by the existing filings in the Trial Court’s docket.” He further maintains that he cannot furnish copies of the trial court’s order because he has no access to a photocopier. “Although the claims pleaded in pro se inma te petitions should be liberally construed, the same procedural standards apply to inmates as to other litigants.” In re Buholtz , No. 05

- 14

- 01286

- CV, 2014 WL 5426127, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Dallas Oct. 27, 2014, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). “If a pro se litigan t is not required to comply with the applicable rules of procedure, he would be given an unfair advantage over a litigant who is represented by counsel.” Id . “There cannot be two sets of procedural rules, one for litigants with counsel and the other for l itigants2

representing themselves.” Id

. Accordingly, because Vega has provided this Court with neither an appendix nor a record, we are unable to determine that he is entitled to mandamus relief. Thus, we deny Vega’s petition for writ of mandamus. Opinio n delivered December 21, 2017. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(PUBLISH)3 

## COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

DECEMBER 2 1 , 2017

NO. 12

- 17

- 00386

- CV

VICTOR VEGA, Relator V.

HON. PAM FLETCHER , Respondent

O RIGINAL P ROCEEDING

ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus filed by Victor Vega; who is the relator in Cause No. DCCV17

- 432

- 349, pending on the docket of the
349 th Judicial District Court of Anderson County , Texas. Said petition for writ of mandamus having been filed herein on December 7, 2017, and the same having been duly considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that a writ should not issue , it is th erefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the said petition for writ of mandamus be, and the same is, hereby denied

. By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that (1) this
Quarterly Report of MSX International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal period ended April 4, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Robert Netolicka
--------------------
Robert Netolicka
Chief Executive Officer
May 7, 2004



/s/ Frederick K. Minturn
------------------------
Frederick K. Minturn
Chief Financial Officer
May 7, 2004





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to MSX International, Inc. and will be retained by MSX International,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
**EXHIBIT 31.3**

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer****Pursuant to Section 302 of the****Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Clinton H. Severson, certify that: 
|  | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Abaxis, Inc.; and |
|--|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|--|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|      |                    |
|---------------------|-------------------------|
|      |                    |
| Date: July 29, 2016 | /s/ Clinton H. Severson |
|                | Clinton H. Severson     |
|                | Chief Executive Officer |
**Exhibit 99.1**

**Certification Pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(18 U.S.C. ss. 1350)**

          The undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer of CNB Holdings, Inc., certifies that the Quarterly Report onForm 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003, which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CNB Holdings, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The forgoing certification is made pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose.

          Dated this 13th day of May, 2003.

|   | /s/ H.N. PADGET, JR.                                                                      |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                                                                           |   |
|   | **H.N. Padget, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)** |   |
#### STATE v. ALVIN SANDLIN and CLYDE SANDLIN.

(Filed 14 October, 1959.)

1. Assault and Battery § 12—

In a prosecution for assault with a deadly weapon, the admission of defendants that they used a deadly weapon does not place the burden upon them of proving- that they acted in self-defense.

Higgins, .L, not sitting.

Appeal-by defendants from *Mints, J.,*May, 1959 Term, of Onslow.

Defendants were tried on bills of indictment which charged an assault on Bill Wiggs with a deadly weapon a hoe handle, *“to*the great damage of the said Bill Wiggs. . .

The cases were consolidated for trial. The State offered evidence tending to show the defendants assaulted Wiggs as charged, resulting in the fracture of bones of his left arm.

Defendants, in support of their plea of not guilty, testified they only acted in self-defense after Wiggs had threatened to shoot and kill.

The court charged the jury: “. . . the defendant having'admitted ■on the stand that he struck with a deadly weapon as charged, the question of-reasonable doubt was eliminated and the burden of proof shifts to the defendant and that it was his duty to satisfy the jury that he struck in self-defense, and failing to satisfy' the jury that he used the weapon in self-defense, they would convict." Defendants excepted to the quoted portion of the -charge.

The jury found defendants guilty. Sentences were imposed and defendants appealed.

*Attorney General Seawell and Assistant Attorney General Love for the State.*

*E. W. Summersill and Robert E. Lock for defendant, appellant.*

PER Ourtam

Defendants were not charged with murder, but an assault. It was error to place on them the burden of proving they acted in self-defence. *S. v. Warren,*242 N.C. 581, 89 S.E. 2d 109; *S. v. Muscat,*247 N.C. 266, 100 S.E. 2d 510.

New trial.

Higgins, J., not sitting.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3727 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3727

 To ensure that employees of the Internal Revenue Service are brought 
 back to their offices until the backlog of 2020 tax returns has been 
                              eliminated.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 2, 2022

  Mr. Kennedy introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To ensure that employees of the Internal Revenue Service are brought 
 back to their offices until the backlog of 2020 tax returns has been 
                              eliminated.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Require Employees To Uniformly 
Return Now Act'' or the ``RETURN Act''.

SEC. 2. BRINGING IRS EMPLOYEES BACK TO THE OFFICE.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other law, in the case of an 
applicable employee, such employee shall not be authorized to telework 
during the period--
            (1) beginning on the date that is 5 business days after the 
        date of enactment of this Act, and
            (2) ending on the date on which the Commissioner of 
        Internal Revenue certifies that the processing backlog with 
        respect to income tax returns for taxable year 2020 has been 
        eliminated.
    (b) Definitions.--In this section--
            (1) Applicable employee.--The term ``applicable employee'' 
        means an employee of the Internal Revenue Service who, as of 
        the date of enactment of this Act, is authorized to telework, 
        on a temporary or permanent basis, pursuant to a policy 
        established by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue in response 
        to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
            (2) Telework.--The term ``telework'' has the same meaning 
        given such term under section 6501(3) of title 5, United States 
        Code.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This shedule contains summary financial information extracted from Consolidated
Audited Financial Statements contained in Form 10KSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                              3,557
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      10,965
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                       253,179
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  309,957
<PP&E>                                             24,097
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (12,524)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    321,530
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             877,806
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                            2,981
<OTHER-SE>                                       (559,257)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      321,530
<SALES>                                         4,112,334
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                4,112,334
<CGS>                                           3,289,640
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   4,350,082
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  1,385
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (239,133)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (239,133)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (239,133)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.08)



</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 30, 2013

t0722 

# Order

Clerk July 30, 2013

146798

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

P laintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146798

COA: 306765

Wayne CC: 10

- 012687

- FC

GERALD PERRY DICKERSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 17, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 4 (Friday, January 6, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 2175]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-443]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


Commodity Futures Trading Commission

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, January 20, 1995.

PLACE: 2033 K St., NW., Washington, DC, 8th Floor Hearing Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-254-6314.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 95-443 Filed 1-4-95; 2:43 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), the undersigned officer of Activant Solutions Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify that, to the best of such officers knowledge (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2003 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to Activant Solutions Inc. and will be retained by Activant Solutions Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



By:



|                          |  |  |  |         
|------------------------- |  |  |  | --------
|/s/ GREG PETERSEN         |  |  |  | 02/10/04
|Greg Petersen             |  |  |  | Date    
|Senior Vice President and |  |  |  |         
|Chief Financial Officer   |  |  |  |
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Amendment No. 1 to
Registration Statement No. 333-47895 of Enhance Financial Services Group Inc.
on Form S-3 of our report, dated March 27, 2000 relating to Enhance Financial
Services Group Inc., and our report dated January 6, 2000 relating to
Credit-Based Asset Servicing and Securitization LLC, each appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Enhance Financial Services Group Inc. for the
year ended December 31, 1999.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

New York, New York
March 29, 2000
Exhibit 23.1  Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  We consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No.s
33-45092, 33-47604, 33-85512, 333-2894, 333-2896, 333-51577, 333-82965,
333-39124, 333-61660, 333-108050, 333-115187, 333-121496, 333-126513,
333-134528, 333-145202, 333-151503 and 333-160120) and Form S-3 (No.s
33-83602, 333-2898, 333-14143, 333-15295, 333-58831, 333-59639, 333-87033,
333-33340, 333-61144, 333-75066, 333-101278, 333-108008, 333-111086,
333-115509, 333-127949, 333-127950, 333-132730, 333-136860, and 333-145200), of
our reports dated February 26, 2010, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,
and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Amylin
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended December 31, 2009.   /s/ Ernst & Young
  LLPSan Diego, CaliforniaFebruary 26, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONRAD
INDUSTRIES INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,851                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,342                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        11                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        248                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,848                       0
<PP&E>                                          26,429                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,755                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,749                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,160                       0
<BONDS>                                          9,968                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            72                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,338                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    47,749                       0
<SALES>                                         23,987                  10,551
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,987                  10,551
<CGS>                                           16,809                   7,285
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,809                   7,285
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,269                     988
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,005                      18
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (96)                   2,260
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,378                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,474)                   2,260
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,474)                   2,260
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.29)                    0.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.29)                    0.48
        

</TABLE>