alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**  I, Michal D. Cann, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Washington BankingCompany; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, orcaused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability offinancial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent function): (a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.     Date: November 8, 2007 /s/ Michal D. Cann                   Michal D. Cann    Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                    INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT


Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
Dallas, Texas

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-56983 on Form S-3
of Cross Timbers Oil Company and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust and in the Post-
Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement No. 33-55784 on Form S-8
of Cross Timbers Oil Company of our report dated March 19, 2001, included in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cross Timbers Royalty Trust for the year ended
December 31, 2000.


/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Fort Worth, Texas
March 30, 2001
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT TO
EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Activant Solutions Inc. for the three
months ended December 31, 2007;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
    5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:
    By:
    /s/ KATHLEEN M. CRUSCOKathleen M. CruscoSenior Vice President and
Chief Financial officer
10262 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 36 / Thursday, February 23, 1995 / Notices

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND

BUDGET

Cumulative Report on Rescissions and

Deferrals

February 1, 1995.

This report is submitted in fulfillment

of the requirement of Section 1014(e) of

the Congressional Budget and

Impoundment Control Act of 1974

(Public Law 93–344). Section 1014(e)

requires a monthly report listing all

budget authority for the current fiscal

year for which, as of the first day of the

month, a special message had been

transmitted to Congress.

This report gives the status, as of

February 1, 1995, of seven deferrals

contained in two special messages for

FY 1995. These messages were

transmitted to Congress on October 18,

and December 13, 1994.

Rescissions

As of February 1, 1995, no rescission

proposals were pending before the

Congress.

Deferrals (Table A and Attachment A)

As of February 1, 1995, $2,707.0

million in budget authority was being

deferred from obligation. Attachment A

shows the status of each deferral

reported during FY 1995.

Information from Special Messages

The special messages containing

information on the deferrals that are

covered by this cumulative report are

printed in the Federal Register cited

below:

59 FR 54066, Thursday, October 27,

1994

59 FR 67108, Wednesday, December 29,

1994

Alice M. Rivlin,

Director.

BILLING CODE 3110–01–M
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 36 / Thursday, February 23, 1995 / Notices 10263
10264 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 36 / Thursday, February 23, 1995 / Notices

[FR Doc. 95–4324 Filed 2–22–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3110–01–C
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.9

                           LOAN SATISFACTION AGREEMENT

         THIS LOAN SATISFACTION AGREEMENT ("Agreement"), dated as of June 7,
2007, is by and between Seamless Wi-Fi, Inc., a Nevada corporation ("Seamless")
and Ayuda Funding Corp., a Nevada corporation ("Ayuda") (individually, a
"Party"; collectively, the "Parties").

         WHEREAS, Seamless has borrowed $4,600,000 under three loan agreements
with Ayuda (collectively, the "Loan");

         WHEREAS, the current balance of the Loan is $4,904,508.03;

         WHEREAS, Seamless currently owns 1,000,000 shares of common stock of
1st Global Financial Corporation, a Nevada corporation, and 500,000 shares of
common stock of DLR Funding, Inc., a Nevada corporation (collectively, the
"Valuable Assets"); and

         WHEREAS, Seamless desires to transfer to Ayuda, and Ayuda desires to
receive from Seamless, the Valuable Assets as payment for the full balance of
the Loan.

         NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and respective mutual
agreements herein contained, it is agreed by and between the Parties hereto as
follows:

         1. SETTLEMENT AND DISCHARGE OF LOAN. Upon execution of this Agreement
(the "Closing"), subject to the terms and conditions herein set forth, Seamless
shall transfer to Ayuda, and Ayuda shall accept from Seamless, the Valuable
Assets as final settlement for the full balance of the Loan. Notwithstanding
anything else in this Agreement, effective as of the Closing, the Loan shall be
immediately deemed satisfied in full.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement, as
of the date first written hereinabove.

SEAMLESS WI-FI, INC.,                   AYUDA FUNDING CORP.,
a Nevada corporation                    a Nevada corporation

 /s/ Albert Reda                        /s/ Manuel M. Bello
------------------------------------   -----------------------------------------
Albert Reda, Chief Executive Officer   Manuel M. Bello, Chief Executive Officer
#### BEULAH STEWART SADLER v. ISRAEL SCHWARTS et al.

(Filed 30 April, 1930.)

Appeal by defendants from *Sink, Special Judge,*at January Special Term, 1930. From Mecklenburg.

Civil action to recover damages for an alleged negligent injury ■caused by a collision between a Chrysler automobile, in which plaintiff was riding, and a truck belonging to the defendants and operated at the time by an employee.

From a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff, the defendants .appeal, assigning errors.

*C. A. Cochran and John M. Bobinson for plaintiff.*

*J. Laurence J ones for defendcmts.*

Per Curiam.

The case presents no new question of law and the record ■contains no reversible error. Hence, the verdict and judgment will be -upheld.

No error.
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 9, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6842-6843]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02445]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Publication of Housing Price Inflation Adjustment

AGENCY: Office of the Under Secretary (Personnel and Readiness), DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 6843]]

SUMMARY: The Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, as codified at 50 U.S.C. 
App. Sec.  3951, prohibits a landlord from evicting a Service member 
(or the Service member's family) from a residence during a period of 
military service except by court order. The law as originally passed by 
Congress applied to dwellings with monthly rents of $2,400 or less. The 
law requires the Department of Defense to adjust this amount annually 
to reflect inflation and to publish the new amount in the Federal 
Register. We have applied the inflation index required by the statute. 
The maximum monthly rental amount for 50 U.S.C. App. Sec.  3951 
(a)(1)(A)(ii) as of January 1, 2016, will be $3,451.20.

DATES: Effective Date: January 1, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lt Col Reggie D. Yager, Office of the 
Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, (703) 571-9301.

    Dated: February 3, 2016.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2016-02445 Filed 2-8-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
## Detailed Single Year Tables

- Individual Provisions
- Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable)

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						E3.11: Beginning in 2031, apply 2 percent payroll tax rate on earnings over the wage-indexed equivalent of $300,000 in 2017 (about $522,300 in 2031), with the threshold wage-indexed after 2031. Do not provide benefit credit for additional earnings taxed.**

### Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program

### Summarized Estimates
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PW PREFERRED
YIELD FUND II, LTD. FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996<F1>
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       2,524,801
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,300,409
<ALLOWANCES>                                   125,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      35,952,539
<DEPRECIATION>                              21,081,123
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,597,031
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          869,508
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,727,523
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,597,031
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,536,793
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               114,908
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                50,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                979,886
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            979,886
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   979,886
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    10.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>5.02(13) AND 5.02(14) REFLECT PROVISIONS FOR EQUIPMENT IMPAIRMENT AND INCLUDE
BOTH LEASED EQUIPMENT AND EQUIPMENT HELD FOR SALE OR LEASE.
5.03(31) REFLECT THE CAPITAL ACCOUNTS OF BOTH LIMITED PARTNERS AND GENERAL
PARTNERS, ADJUSTED FOR ACCUMULATED EARNINGS, DISTRIBUTORS AND SYNDICATION COST.
</FN>


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

WAL

- MART STORES TEXAS, L.L.C.,

d/b/a WAL

- MART

- SUPERCENTER,

Appellant,

V.

SONIA DOZAL,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 13

- 00198

- CV

Appeal from the

327th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2011

- DCV

- 00932)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal and

concludes the motion should be granted and the appeal should be dismissed, in accordance with

the opinion of this Court. We therefore dismiss the appeal. Costs of the appeal are taxed against

Appellant. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.1(d). This decisi on shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2014.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
#### RALPH T. REAVIS v. WILLIAM A. BEAM and RED BIRD CAB COMPANY and BOBBY GENE REAVIS, by his Next Friend, RALPH T. REAVIS v. WILLIAM A. BEAM and RED BIRD CAB COMPANY.

(Filed 4 May, 1960.)

Negligence § 29—

The issues of contributory negligence and last clear ebance do not arise when there is insufficient evidence to be submitted to the jury on the issue of negligence.

Appeals from *McKinnon, J.,*August, 1959 Civil Term, Guilford Superior Court, Greensboro Division.

These civil actions grew out of an injury to Bobby Gene Reavis, minor son of Ralph T. Reavis, alleged to have resulted from the defendants’ actionable negligence. In the first action the father seeks to recover expenses for treatment, and loss of wages during the minority of the son. In the second, the son, by his next friend, seeks to recover for his injuries.

The plaintiffs’ evidence disclosed that Bobby Gene Reavis, on an exceedingly rainy night, attempted to cross Webb Avenue in Burlington within the block at a point not marked or intended for pedestrian use. The defendants’ cab turned into Webb Avenue from Hoke .Street and was going at ten to fifteen miles per hour when it struck Bobby Gene Reavis near the curb on the defendants’ right-hand side of the street. Bobby Gene testified that after seeing the cab lights for the first time they were so near, “it happened so quick I couldn’t move.”

Issues of negligence, contributory negligence, and last clear chance arose on the pleadings. At the close of the plaintiffs’ evidence, however, the court entered judgments of nonsuit, from which plaintiffs appealed.

*480*Wade C. Euliss, Hines & Morrisette, By: Stedman Hines for plaintiffs, appellants.*

*Smith, Moore, Smith, Schell & Hunter, By: Bynum H. Hunter for defendants, appellees.*

Per CuRiam.

On the oral argument here, the plaintiffs confined the discussion to the sufficiency of the evidence to go to the jury on the defendants’ last clear’ chance to avoid the injury. However, issues of negligence and contributory negligence were discussed in the brief. After careful analysis, we fail to find any evidence of actionable negligence on the part of the defendants. Hence issues of contributory negligence and last clear chance do not arise. The judgments of non-suit in the court below are

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9718]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4094]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
[AC-10; OTS No. 04411]


Bank West, F.S.B., Grand Rapids, Michigan; Approval of Conversion 
Application

    Notice is hereby given that on February 2, 1995, the Deputy 
Assistant Director, Corporate Activities, Office of Thrift Supervision, 
or her designee, acting pursuant to delegated authority, approved the 
application of Bank West, F.S.B., Grand Rapids, Michigan, to convert to 
the stock form of organization. Copies of the application are available 
for inspection at the Information Services Division, Office of Thrift 
Supervision, 1700 G Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20552, and the 
Central Regional Office, Office of Thrift Supervision, 111 East Wacker 
Drive, Suite 800, Chicago, Illinois 60601-4360.

    Dated: February 14, 1995.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Nadine Y. Washington,
Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-4094 Filed 2-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
### Proposed Provision: G1. Invest 40 percent of the OASI and DI Trust Fund reserves in equities (phased in 2024-2038), assuming an ultimate 5.8 percent annual real rate of return on equities.

back
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3826 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 326
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3826

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1304 4th Avenue in Canyon, Texas, as the ``Gary James Fletcher Post 
                           Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 14, 2022

 Mr. Cornyn (for himself and Mr. Cruz) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

               April 4 (legislative day, March 31), 2022

               Reported by Mr. Peters, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1304 4th Avenue in Canyon, Texas, as the ``Gary James Fletcher Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GARY JAMES FLETCHER POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1304 4th Avenue in Canyon, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Gary James Fletcher Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Gary James 
Fletcher Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 326

117th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3826

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1304 4th Avenue in Canyon, Texas, as the ``Gary James Fletcher Post 
                           Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

               April 4 (legislative day, March 31), 2022

                       Reported without amendment
```
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and

Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors

so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 14-BG-481

IN RE: STANLEY E. GREENIDGE,

Respondent.

Bar Registration No. 113993

BEFORE: Beckwith, Associate Judge, and Nebeker and Terry, Senior Judges. 

ORDER

(FILED - August 21, 2014)

On consideration of the certified order suspending respondent for a period of

one year, all but three months stayed, followed by a nine-month probation in the state

of Massachusetts, this court’s May 20, 2014, order directing respondent to show

cause why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, the statement ofBar Counsel,

and it appearing that respondent has failed to file either a response to this court’s

order to show cause or the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, §14 (g), it is

ORDERED that Stanley E. Greenidge is hereby suspended for a period of one

year, all but three months stayed, followed by a nine-month probationary period

subject to the terms imposed by the state of Massachusetts. See In re Sibley, 990

A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010), and In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) (rebuttable

presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the

respondent does not participate). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement the period of

respondent’s suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit

that fully complies with the requirements of D.C. Bar. R. XI, §14 (g). 

PER CURIAM