alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-09-00004-CV

Cheyenne Winters, Appellant

v.

Thomas Marshall Winters, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF MILLS COUNTY, 35TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 07-02-5943, HONORABLE STEPHEN ELLIS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

 On January 5, 2009, appellant Cheyenne Winters filed her notice of appeal without

paying a filing fee. On January 14, 2009, this Court received Winters’s affidavit of indigence along

with a motion for leave to file the affidavit. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(c)(3). On February 5, 2009,

this Court received appellee Thomas Marshall Winters’s contest to appellant’s affidavit.

See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(e). 

We abate the appeal, and, pursuant to rule 20.1, refer this contest to the trial court for

an evidentiary hearing on appellant’s claim of indigence. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(h)(4). The trial

court shall give the parties reasonable notice of the date on which the contest will be heard and shall

permit appellant to amend her affidavit of indigence any time before that date.

See Higgins v. Randall County Sheriff’s Office, 193 S.W.3d 898, 899 (Tex. 2006).
2

A supplemental clerk’s record containing the documents relating to the contest shall

be filed within 30 days from the date of this order. The appeal will be reinstated when the record

on the contest is filed.

 

J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Henson

Abated

Filed: February 13, 2009
EXHIBIT 31.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Abaxis, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:    June 13, 2008
    /s/ Clinton H. SeversonClinton H. SeversonPresident and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 13.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT**

**TO SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Intertape Polymer Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gregory A. Yull, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: March 20, 2014
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9669-9670]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4155]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Announcement of the American Petroleum Institute's Standards 
Activity

agency: National Institute of Standards and Technology, Commerce.

action: Notice of intent to develop a voluntary standard and request 
for public comments and participation in standard's development.

----------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 9670]] 


summary: The American Petroleum Institute (API), with the assistance of 
other interested parties, continues to develop standards, both national 
and international, in several areas. This notice list the 
standardization effort currently being conducted. The publication of 
this notice by the National Institute of Standards and Technology 
(NIST) on behalf of API is being undertaken as a public service. NIST 
does not necessarily endorse, approve, or recommend the proposed 
standard being referenced in this notice.

supplementary information: The American Petroleum Institute is 
developing a voluntary standard on which to base a voluntary program to 
accredit laboratories that perform testing on petroleum products 
[Petroleum Test Laboratories Accreditation Program (PTLAP)]. The 
program objective is to assist users in identifying laboratories which 
meet specific industry standards and to improve the quality of 
petroleum testing results. The proposed standard and subsequent program 
will consist of the following elements:
    <bullet> Accredited laboratories having a quality system based on 
the requirements of ISO Guide 25, General Requirements of the 
Competence of Calibration and Testing Laboratories.
    <bullet> Labortories submitting to an on-site assessment by API-
qualified assessors to establish compliance with program requirements. 
This assessment includes witnessing of test methods, evaluation of 
technical competence, and a quality system review.
    <bullet> Laboratory participation in the ASTM Interlaboratory 
Crosscheck Program and the successful completion of one unannounced on-
site assessment evaluation during the three-year accreditation period.

dates: The voluntary standard is expected to be completed by March 1995 
following peer review and an open meeting.
addresses: Comments regarding this proposal should be submitted to 
Roland Goodman, American Petroleum Institute, 1220 L Street NW., 
Washington, DC 20005, Telephone (202) 682-8189.

for further information contact: Roland Goodman, American Petroleum 
Institute, at above address, (202) 682-8189.

    Authority: 15 U.S.C. 272.

    Dated: February 14, 1995.
Samuel Kramer,
Associate Director.
[FR Doc. 95-4155 Filed 2-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-13-M
#### MARY J. MALPHURS, Administratrix, v. T. S. ELLINGTON et al.

(Filed 18 September, 1935.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *Harding, J.,*at January Special Term, 1935, of Mecklenburg.

Civil action to recover damages for death of plaintiff’s intestate, alleged to have been caused by tbe neglect, default, or wrongful act of tbe defendant, when tbe cart in which plaintiff’s intestate was riding was struck by an automobile owned by tbe defendant T. S. Ellington, and operated at tbe time by bis son, John Ellington.

Tbe jury returned tbe following verdict:

“1. Was tbe plaintiff’s intestate killed by tbe negligence of tbe defendant, as alleged? A. ‘Yes.’

“2. Did tbe plaintiff’s intestate, by bis own negligence, contribute to bis death, as alleged in tbe answer? A. ‘Yes.’ ”

Judgment on tbe verdict for defendants, from which plaintiff appeals, assigning errors.

*J. D. McCall, G. T. Carswell, and Joe W. Ervin for plaintiff.*

*J. Laurence J ones and Plummer Stewart for defendants.*

*835Pee CueiaM.

Tbe jury's answer to tbe second issue bars recovery on tbe part of tbe plaintiff. *Rimmer v. R. R., ante,*198; *Moore v. Iron Works,*183 N. C., 438, 111 S. E., 776. Tbe case on trial narrowed itself largely to controverted issues of fact. Botb were found to be negligent. No reversible error bas been made to appear. While some of tbe illustrations used by tbe judge in bis charge seem a little inapposite, still tbey appear to be without material significance. They could hardly have affected tbe result. *S. v. Marshall, ante,*127.

In tbe absence of a clearer showing, tbe verdict and judgment must be upheld. It is so ordered.

No error.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NASB Financial, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Rhonda Nyhus, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.


February 9, 2006            By:  /s/ Rhonda Nyhus
                                 Rhonda Nyhus
                                 Vice President and Treasurer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to NASB Financial, Inc. and will be retained by NASB
Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.



This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein , and not for
any other purpose.

<Page>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3825 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.3825

                    One Hundred Seventeenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and twenty two

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 3903 Melear Drive in Arlington, Texas, as the ``Ron Wright Post Office 
                               Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. RON WRIGHT POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 3903 Melear Drive in Arlington, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Ron Wright Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Ron Wright 
Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 99-20125

Summary Calendar

_______________________

In The Matter Of: RICHARD HENRY PARKER, JR.,

Debtor.

____________________

RICHARD HENRY PARKER, JR.,

Appellant,

versus

DONALD M. LANCON; KATHLEEN ROBINSON; ROY BERT ROBINSON,

Appellees.

______________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-97-CV-569

______________________________________________________________

March 21, 2000

Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

As Judge Hittner’s opinion notes, Parker, the attorneyappellant here, has been a party to many lawsuits and proceedings

in state courts, bankruptcy court and federal district court. In

the appeal before us, he is attempting to overcome the bankruptcy

court’s ruling that a case he attempted to pursue in state court in

Galveston was barred by the doctrines of res judicata and

collateral estoppel. Parker raises only three issues on appeal:
2

the propriety of the removal; the bankruptcy court’s refusal to

abstain; and the bankruptcy court’s summary dismissal of his

claims. These issues are easily resolved.

Although the notice of removal was directed to the wrong

division of the Southern District of Texas, defendants removed the

case from state court to the bankruptcy court intending that it

should be handled by Judge Greendyke, who is presiding over

Parker’s personal bankruptcy. Any error in failing to file the

notice of appeal in the Galveston rather than the Houston division,

in both of which Judge Greendyke is an active judge, is merely

technical and bears on venue rather than the bankruptcy court’s

jurisdiction. Similarly, any defect in notice of the removal filed

with the Galveston state court is non-jurisdictional and factually

unsubstantiated.

The bankruptcy court did not abuse his discretion in

failing to abstain from hearing this case, which bears on an asset

allegedly belonging to the debtor’s estate and replicates a number

of previous claims asserted by Parker and rejected in the

bankruptcy court.

Finally, the bankruptcy court warned Parker as early as

its September, 1996 hearing, that the claims he asserted in the

Galveston case appeared to be barred by res judicata and collateral

estoppel. The court repeated this belief in the November

scheduling hearing. Parker was on ample notice that the court was

considering these issues, and he had plenty of time to brief them

before the court’s final order denying reconsideration was entered.
3

No reversible error is shown in any of the bankruptcy court’s

rulings or in the district court’s opinion affirming them.

AFFIRMED.
** **

 

******** 

******** 

 

 

Exhibit 32.1

**** 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**** 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Washington Banking Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John L. Wagner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:    

 

(1)         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.

 

This certification is being furnished solely to comply with the requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any of the Company’s filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise be deemed to be filed as part of the Report or under such Acts. 

 

 

/s/ John L. Wagner              

John L. Wagner

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

May 7, 2010

                                                                               

                                                                               

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       7,728,075
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         355,477
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 43,298,035
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    159,064,451
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,979,293
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             227,504,180
<DEPOSITS>                                 177,456,422
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,547,406
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,529,833
<LONG-TERM>                                 25,442,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,498
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,525,021
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             227,504,180
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             11,071,919
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            2,228,462
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               131,418
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            13,431,799
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           5,148,776
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,182,636
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        7,100,387
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  470,616
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              (1,142)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              6,850,217
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,453,077
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,869,720
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,869,720
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .54
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.67
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,214,149
<LOANS-PAST>                                   274,553
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,849,356
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  610,017
<RECOVERIES>                                   269,338
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,979,293
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,979,293
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
II 

Calendar No. 394 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3595 

To amend the Small Business Act to require the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman to create a centralized 

website for compliance guides, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 8 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 3), 2022 

Mr. CORNYN (for himself, Mrs. SHAHEEN, and Ms. ROSEN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Small 

Business and Entrepreneurship 

MAY 25, 2022 

Reported by Mr. CARDIN, without amendment 

A BILL 

To amend the Small Business Act to require the Small 

Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman to create a centralized website for compliance 

guides, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘One Stop Shop for 

5 Small Business Compliance Act of 2022’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3595 RS

1 SEC. 2. CENTRALIZED WEBSITE FOR COMPLIANCE GUIDES. 

2 Section 30 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 657) 

3 is amended by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(e) CENTRALIZED WEBSITE.—Not later than 6 

5 months after the date of enactment of this subsection, the 

6 Ombudsman shall maintain a publicly available website 

7 that includes— 

8 ‘‘(1) hyperlinks to small entity compliance 

9 guides described in section 212(a)(1) of the Small 

10 Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 

11 1996 (5 U.S.C. 601 note); and 

12 ‘‘(2) with respect to each small entity compli13 ance guide described in paragraph (1), the contact 

14 information for an individual who can offer assist15 ance to small entities with respect to the rules that 

16 are the subject of the guide. 

17 ‘‘(f) REPORT ON AGENCY COMPLIANCE.—The Om18 budsman shall include in the annual report required under 

19 subsection (b)(2)(C) an assessment of agency compliance 

20 with the requirements of section 212 of the Small Busi21 ness Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (5 

22 U.S.C. 601 note) for the year covered by the annual re23 port.’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Calendar No. 394 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3595 

A BILL 

To amend the Small Business Act to require the 

poses. website for compliance guides, and for other purforcement Ombudsman to create a centralized Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory EnMAY 25, 2022 

Reported without amendment 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB