alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1



                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Richard McClearn, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Neometrix
Technology Group, Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
annual report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

                  a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
         that material information relating to the registrant, including its
         consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
         entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
         being prepared;

                  b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
         controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing
         date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

                  c. presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
         evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

         5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

                  a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
         internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability
         to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
         identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
         internal controls; and

                  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
         management or other employees who have a significant role in the
         registrant's internal controls; and

         6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in
this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



/s/ RICHARD MCCLEARN
-----------------------------------
Richard McClearn
### Proposed Provision: B5.8. Beginning in 2028, create a Basic Minimum Benefit (BMB) within Social Security (i.e., the cost of the BMB would be charged as a cost to the OASI Trust Fund), with the following specifications: (1) Eligibility for the BMB would be limited to OASI beneficiaries who have attained normal retirement age (NRA) or above. OASI beneficiaries under NRA would not be eligible for the BMB. (2) The BMB would be calculated on a household basis and split equally between members of the household. In the case of a married couple, both spouses would need to claim any Social Security benefits for which they are eligible before they could receive the BMB. If both spouses have claimed and one is NRA or above and the other has not yet attained NRA, only the half of the BMB for the spouse over NRA would be payable. (3) The BMB amount for single beneficiaries would be equal to either: 1) the BMB base ($604 in 2015) - 0.70 * current monthly OASI benefit (not including any BMB), if positive; or 2) zero. (4) The BMB amount for married beneficiaries would be equal to either: 1) the BMB base ($906 in 2015) - 0.70 * total household monthly OASI benefits (not including any BMB), if positive; or 2) zero. (5) The BMB bases for singles and couples would be updated annually for changes in the average wage index (AWI). (6) Single filers with Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) over $30,000 and joint filers with AGI (including taxable SS benefits) over $45,000 would be subject to clawback of the BMB through the income tax system. Any BMB would be reduced by one dollar for every dollar of income above the thresholds. (Thresholds, in 2015 dollars, would be indexed to chained CPI-U.) Clawbacks would be credited back to the OASI Trust Fund.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,345,288
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  576,061
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    566,714
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       6,105,050
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,593,113
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,084,297
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,593,113
<SALES>                                        480,241
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,668,842
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,259,927
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               194,370
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               710,868
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             251,161
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                408,915
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            408,915
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   408,915
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.80


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      23.1**







**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**


We
        consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
        on
        Forms S-3 (No. 333-106608, No. 333-108924, No. 333-110754, No. 333-110752,
        No.
        333-82496, No. 333-91225, No. 333-91235, No. 333-17105, No. 333-122391, No.
        333-122392, No. 333-133828, No. 333-134626, No. 333-132048 and No. 333-137100)
        and Forms S-8 (No. 333-109595, No. 333-91259, No. 333-137447 and No.
        333-122393) of SpatiaLight, Inc. of our reports dated March 6, 2006, except
        for
        the “Restatement” section of Note 1, the “Issuance of Shares in 2004” section of
        Note 2, and the “Argyle Notes” and “Senior Secured Convertible Debt Financing”
sections of Note 3, as to which the date is February 12, 2007, relating to
        the
        consolidated financial statements of SpatiaLight, Inc. (which report expresses
        an unqualified opinion and includes a matter of emphasis paragraph relating
        to
        the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern), SpatiaLight, Inc.
        management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
        reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting (which
        report expresses an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s
        internal control over financial reporting because of material weaknesses) of
        SpatiaLight, Inc., included in this Annual Report on Form  10-K/A
        (Amendment No. 2) for the year ended December 31, 2005.





ODENBERG,
      ULLAKKO, MURANISHI & CO. LLP





San
      Francisco, California


February
      12, 2007
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 99-20181

Summary Calendar

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PEDRO MUNIVE,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(H-94-CR-300-1)

_________________________________________________________________

January 3, 2000

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Pedro Munive appeals his conviction for conspiracy to possess

with the intent to distribute and aiding and abetting the

possession with the intent to distribute in excess of five

kilograms of cocaine. His sole contention on appeal is that the

district court erred by denying his challenges for cause to three

prospective jurors who testified during voir dire that they would

tend to believe the testimony of government agents, forcing him to

waste peremptory challenges on those jurors.
2

To the extent that Munive contends that the denials of his

challenges for cause violated his Sixth Amendment right to an

impartial jury, the claim fails because he does not contend that

any of the jurors who actually served were not impartial. See Ross

v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 81, 88 (1988); United States v. Webster, 162

F.3d 308, 342 n.36 (5th Cir. 1998) (citation omitted), cert.

denied, ___ U.S. ___, 120 S. Ct. 83 (1999). Munive’s claim that he

was denied his statutory right to free exercise of his peremptory

challenges also fails because he has not demonstrated that the

district court abused its discretion in determining that the

challenged jurors were impartial. See United States v. Scott, 159

F.3d 916, 925 (5th Cir. 1998); United States v. Munoz, 15 F.3d 395,

397 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1134 (1994).

AFFIRMED
## Detailed Single Year Tables

- Individual Provisions
- Level of Monthly Benefits

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						B3.11: Increase the first PIA factor from 90 percent to 93 percent for all beneficiaries eligible as of January 2025 and for those newly eligible for benefits after 2024.**

### Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program

### Summarized Estimates
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3883 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3883

To authorize the construction of the project for navigation, Brunswick 
                            Harbor, Georgia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 21, 2022

  Mr. Ossoff introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the construction of the project for navigation, Brunswick 
                            Harbor, Georgia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Port of Brunswick Navigation Channel 
Improvement Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds that--
            (1) the Colonel's Island Terminal in Brunswick, Georgia, is 
        the largest dedicated roll-on/roll-off facility in the United 
        States and the second busiest in the United States;
            (2) the Port of Brunswick is a vital line to global markets 
        for automotive, heavy machinery, and other breakbulk shippers;
            (3) despite the challenges of the global pandemic, the 
        Colonel's Island Terminal moved 650,000 units of vehicles and 
        heavy machinery in 2021, an increase of 10 percent over the 
        previous year;
            (4) the facilities of the Port of Brunswick at Mayor's 
        Point and East River Terminal are key ports for critical 
        products, including forest materials and renewable fuels grown 
        in Georgia; and
            (5) the deepwater ports and inland barge terminals of 
        Georgia support more than 496,700 jobs throughout the State 
        annually and contribute $29,000,000,000 in income, 
        $6,100,000,000 in Federal revenue, and $3,400,000,000 in State 
        and local taxes to the economy of Georgia.

SEC. 3. BRUNSWICK HARBOR FEDERAL NAVIGATION CHANNEL, GEORGIA.

    The project for navigation, Brunswick Harbor, Georgia, is 
authorized to be carried out by the Secretary of the Army substantially 
in accordance with the plans, and subject to the conditions, described 
in the report of the Chief of Engineers dated March 11, 2022, at an 
estimated total cost of $14,369,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$10,774,500.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3437 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3437

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To extend certain COVID-19 bankruptcy relief provisions through March 
                               27, 2022.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``COVID-19 Bankruptcy Relief Extension 
Consolidation Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSIONS.

    Section 1001 of division FF of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 
2021 (Public Law 116-260; 124 Stat. 3216) is amended by striking ``the 
date that is 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act'' each 
place the term appears and inserting ``March 27, 2022''.

            Passed the Senate December 18 (legislative day, December 
      17), 2021.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
117th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 3437

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To extend certain COVID-19 bankruptcy relief provisions through March 
                               27, 2022.
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 32 (Thursday, February 16, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9077]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3858]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Public Information Collection Requirements Submitted to OMB for 
Review

February 9, 1995.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Public Law 96-511. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-1305.
    Form Number: IRS Forms 9460 and 9477.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Tax Forms Inventory Report.
    Description: These forms are designed to collect tax forms 
inventory information from banks, post offices, and libraries that 
distribute Federal tax forms. Data is collected detailing the 
quantities and types of tax forms remaining at the end of the filing 
season. This data is combined with shipment data for each account and 
used to establish forms distribution guidelines for the following year. 
Source code data is collected to verify that the different entities 
received tax forms with the correct code.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit, Not-for-profit 
institutions, Federal Government.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 10,720.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent:

    Form 9460--10 minutes.
    Form 9477--15 minutes.

    Frequency of Response: Annually.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 2,600 hours.

    OMB Number: 1545-1316.
    Form Number: IRS Form 9452-A and Letter 2735(NO).
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Reduce Unnecessary Filings (RUF) Worksheet ``Do I Need to 
File--Worksheet''.
    Description: The RUF Program has been nationwide for two years. We 
have successfully decreased the filing of unnecessary returns by 1.1 
million in those two years. This has reduced taxpayer burden and been 
cost effective for the service. This is in line with IRP initiatives 
and compliance.
    Respondents: Individuals or households.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 1,000,000.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 30 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: Annually.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 500,000 hours.

Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear (202) 622-3869, Internal Revenue 
Service, Room 5571, 1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 
20224.
OMB Reviewer: Milo Sunderhauf (202) 395-7340, Office of Management and 
Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 
20503.
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports, Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-3858 Filed 2-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
_______________________________________ __ 

### Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



## September 9, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


## 135987 Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n 

## PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, J ustices



## v SC: 135987 COA: 280337 Wayne CC: 87-010364-01 REGINALD JEROME BROWN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the December 10, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

s0828 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 9, 2008

Clerk
FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 02/4/2015 3:09:28 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3681 

To require the Secretary of State to submit to Congress classified dissent 

cables relating to the withdrawal of the United States Armed Forces 

from Afghanistan. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 17, 2022 

Mr. THUNE (for himself, Mr. RISCH, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. BRAUN, Mr. 

CRAMER, Mr. CRUZ, Mr. DAINES, Ms. ERNST, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, Mr. 

HOEVEN, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina, Mr. SULLIVAN, and 

Mr. WICKER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of State to submit to Congress 

classified dissent cables relating to the withdrawal of 

the United States Armed Forces from Afghanistan. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SUBMISSION TO CONGRESS OF DISSENT CA4 BLES RELATING TO WITHDRAWAL OF THE 

5 UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES FROM AF6 GHANISTAN. 

7 (a) SUBMISSION OF CLASSIFIED DISSENT CABLES

8 TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 30 days after the date of 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3681 IS

1 the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State shall sub2 mit to Congress any classified Department of State cable 

3 or memo that expresses a dissenting recommendation or 

4 opinion with respect to the withdrawal of the United 

5 States Armed Forces from Afghanistan. 

6 (b) PUBLIC AVAILABILITY OF UNCLASSIFIED DIS7 SENT CABLES.—Not later than 60 days after the date of 

8 the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State shall 

9 make available to the public an unclassified version of any 

10 such cable or memo. 

11 (c) PROTECTION OF PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE IN12 FORMATION.—The name and any other personally identifi13 able information of an author of a cable or memo referred 

14 to in subsection (a) shall be redacted before submission 

15 under that subsection or publication under subsection (b). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


              [LETTERHEAD OF MILLER AND LENTS, LTD. APPEARS HERE]

                              March 30, 1998

Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
500 West Seventh Street
P.O. Box 1317
Fort Worth, TX 76102

     Re:   Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
           1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K

Gentlemen:

     The firm of Miller and Lents, Ltd., consents to the use of its name and to
the use of its report dated March 25, 1998, regarding the Cross Timbers Royalty
Trust Proved Reserves and Future Net Revenue as of January 1, 1998, in the 1997
Annual Report on Form 10-K.

     Miller and Lents, Ltd., has no interests in the Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
or in any affiliated companies or subsidiaries and is not to receive any such
interest as payment for such reports and has no director, officer, or employee
otherwise connected with Cross Timbers Royalty Trust.  We are not employed by
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust on a contingent basis.

                              Yours very truly,

                              MILLER AND LENTS, LTD.


                              By     /s/ P.G. Von Tungeln
                                   ----------------------
                                    P.G. Von Tungeln
                                    Chairman