alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-6685

THOMAS EDWARD BRUCE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

ELLIS B. WRIGHT,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. B. Waugh Crigler, Magistrate Judge.

(CA-93-232-R)

Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 4, 1996

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Edward Bruce, Appellant Pro Se. John H. McLees, Jr., OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to

appeal and dismiss the appeal substantially on the reasoning of the

district court. Bruce v. Wright, No. CA-93-232-R (W.D. Va. Mar. 30,

1995). Two of Appellant's claims involved state evidentiary matters, which are not generally the basis for federal habeas relief.

Chance v. Garrison, 537 F.2d 1212, 1215 (4th Cir. 1976). Some of

Appellant's claims were not presented to the state court, so those

claims are defaulted. Further, the state court found several of

Appellant's claims procedurally barred, and he has not shown cause

and prejudice or actual innocence to overcome the bar. Murray v.

Carrier, 477 U.S. 478 (1986). Finally, Appellant did not establish

ineffective assistance of counsel warranting habeas relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 694 (1984). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3773 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3773

 To authorize leases of up to 99 years for land held in trust for the 
            Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                March 8 (legislative day, March 7), 2022

  Ms. Cantwell (for herself and Mrs. Murray) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize leases of up to 99 years for land held in trust for the 
            Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE CHEHALIS RESERVATION LEASING 
              AUTHORITY.

    Subsection (a) of the first section of the Act of August 9, 1955 
(69 Stat. 539, chapter 615; 25 U.S.C. 415(a)), is amended, in the 
second sentence, by inserting ``, land held in trust for the 
Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation'' after ``Crow Tribe of 
Montana''.
                                 <all>
```
EX-4.2





 Exhibit 4.2 
  





 
 HTG INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE LOGO HTG Molecular Diagnostics, Inc. COMMON STOCK CUSIP 40434H 30 2 SEE REVERSE
FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS THIS CERTIFIES THAT specimen is the owner of FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $0.001 PER SHARE, OF HTG Molecular Diagnostics, Inc. transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder
hereof in person or by duly authorized Attorney, upon surrender of this Certificate, properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid until countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar. WITNESS the facsimile seal of the
Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. Dated PRESIDENT SEAL SECRETARY AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE AND REGISTRAR TRANSFER AGENT Brooklyn, NY AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY, LLC COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED













 



 
 The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were
written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM as tenants in common TEN ENT as tenants by the entireties JT TEN as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common UNIF GIFT MIN ACT Custodian (Cust)
(Minor) under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act (State) Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. FOR VALUE RECEIVED hereby sell, assign and transfer unto PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE) Shares of the common stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the
within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT
OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER Signature(s) Guaranteed: THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE
MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Greg Petersen, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Activant Solutions Inc. (the
Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section
906), that, to the best of my knowledge:  
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended December
31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Activant
Solutions Inc. and will be retained by Activant Solutions Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. By: /s/ GREG PETERSEN
    
    2/10/05Greg Petersen
    
    DateSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES -OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Belden & Blake Corporation (the Company) on Form
10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated
below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the knowledge of the undersigned:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: August 2, 2005
    /s/ Robert W. PeshekRobert W. Peshek, Senior Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer This certification
accompanies the Form 10-K/A and shall not be treated as having been filed as part
of the Form 10-K/A.
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION BALTIMORE, MD 21235-0001

SOCIAL SECURITY

Office of the Chief Actuary

December 7, 2018

The Honorable Seth Moulton

United States House of Representatives

Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Representative Moulton:

I am writing in response to your request for estimates of the financial effects on Social Security 

of H.R. 1171, the ALS Disability Insurance Access Act of 2017, which you introduced on 

February 16, 2017. The estimates provided here reflect the intermediate assumptions of the 2018

Trustees Report. This Bill (hereafter referred to as the proposal) includes provisions with direct 

effects on the Social Security Trust Funds. We have enjoyed working with Christine Raymond of 

your staff in evaluating this proposal. The estimates and analysis provided here reflect the 

combined effort of many in the Office of the Chief Actuary, but most particularly William 

Jimenez, Micah Akerlind, Michael Stephens, Christopher Chaplain, and Karen Glenn.

Enactment of this proposal would eliminate the 5-month waiting period for receipt of Social 

Security disabled worker benefits based on entitlement with a diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral 

sclerosis (ALS). In addition to accelerating the availability of monthly Social Security benefits 

for qualifying workers, eligibility for Medicare coverage would be accelerated by 5 months as 

well. Under current law, the general additional 24-month waiting period for Medicare eligibility 

after entitlement for the Social Security disabled worker benefits is already waived for 

individuals who are medically determined to have ALS. For this estimate, we assume that the 5-

month waiting period elimination would be applicable for initial applications for Social Security 

disabled worker benefits filed in January 1, 2019 or later. 

Over the 10-year period 2018 through 2027, we estimate that Social Security Disability 

Insurance benefits would be increased by a total of $200.3 million. The net effect on the 

Disability Insurance Trust Fund operations would be slightly less over the period due to revenue 

that would be transferred to the trust fund based on income taxation of the additional benefits. 

The table below shows our estimated increase in DI benefit payments for each calendar year 

2018 through 2027.

Estimated Change in DI Benefit Cost in millions, Calendar Years 2018 through 2027

2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2018-22 2018-27

$0.0 $12.3 $19.2 $20.4 $21.6 $22.8 $24.1 $25.4 $26.7 $27.9 $73.5 $200.3
Page 2 – The Honorable Seth Moulton

Over the long-range 75-year projection period, we estimate that the effect of enacting the Bill 

would be negligible (i.e., less than 0.005 percent of taxable payroll over the period.) 

We hope these estimates are helpful. Please let me know if we may provide further assistance.

Sincerely,

Stephen C. Goss, ASA, MAAA

Chief Actuary
#### Walter Weston and another, Respondents, v. James R. Watts, Appellant.

Order reversed, with costs to abide event.

Opinion by

Brady, J.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members         
    -  AEE Multimedia         
    -  AEE Research Library 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# USSPACECOM integrates with joint forces and allies for Valiant Shield 24

U.S. Space Command

                PETERSON SPACE FORCE BASE, Colo.   –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
### Proposed Provision: B4.4. Reduce the number of computation years (increase dropout years) for parents having a child in care under the age of 6. The parent must have no earnings (covered or non-covered) for the year to be eligible for the credit. Only one parent can claim the childcare added dropout year for a given earnings year. Each parent can earn at most 2 dropout years per child, and a maximum of 5 dropout years in total. The years designated as childcare years do not have to be the years that could otherwise be included in the computation of the average indexed monthly earnings (AIME). The provision would be effective for all benefits payable for entitlement in January 2025 and later (without regard for when the beneficiary became initially eligible).

back
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 14, 1995 / Presidential Documents 8519

Proclamation 6769 of February 10, 1995

National Older Workers Employment Week, 1995

By the President of the United States of America

A Proclamation

Today, our Nation relies more than ever on the active involvement of citizens

55 years old or older. It is estimated that more than 70 percent of these

Americans work every day to keep our Nation running, contributing to

all aspects of our economy and our society. And as our population continues

to age, the contributions of older workers will play an increasingly important

role in maintaining America’s leadership in a highly competitive international

marketplace.

Yet despite often impressive job qualifications, these citizens find that the

search for employment becomes more difficult as they grow older. Those

seeking to change careers or those struggling to find new jobs are too

often confronted by employer reluctance or stereotyping. Rather than being

judged on their abilities, older people sometimes face the injustice of being

judged solely on their age.

But we Americans understand the meaning of fairness and the value of

honest labor. Every reasonable measure of job performance tells us that

older workers are at least as effective as younger employees. In many cases,

their unique combinations of knowledge, skills, insight, and experience make

older Americans even more effective.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, WILLIAM J. CLINTON, President of the United States

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim the week of March

12 through March 18, 1995, as ‘‘National Older Workers Employment Week.’’

I urge all employers to consider carefully the qualifications of men and

women 55 and older and to make use of their talents and expertise. I

also encourage public officials responsible for job placement, training, and

related services to intensify efforts to help older workers find suitable jobs

and training.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this tenth day of

February, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and ninety-five, and

of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred

[FR Doc. 95–3887

Filed 2-13-95; 11:17 am]

Billing code 3195–01–P

and nineteenth.

œ–
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7371

CORNELIUS TUCKER, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

BILL CLINTON, President; J. B. FRENCH; MIKE

EASLEY; MAGISTRATE DIXON,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge.

(CA-95-470-5-BR)

Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 22, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cornelius Tucker, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Cornelius Tucker appeals from the district court's order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition as frivolous pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1988). Our review of the record and the

district court's opinion discloses no abuse of discretion and that

this appeal is without merit. We amend the district court's judgment to reflect that this dismissal is without prejudice. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2106 (1988).

Accordingly, although we grant Tucker's motion for a certificate of probable cause to appeal, we affirm the district court's

dismissal order as modified. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 33 (Friday, February 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9409]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4022]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-30,177 Waterville, ME, TA-W-30,177A Ciales, PR]


Warnaco Men's Apparel Division; Amended Certification Regarding 
Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 USC 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on September 7, 1994, applicable 
to all workers of the Warnaco Men's Apparel Division in Waterville, 
Maine. The certification notice was published in the Federal Register 
on October 4, 1994 (59 FR 50625).
    The Department, at the request of the Amalgamated Clothing and 
Textile Workers Union (ACTWU), reviewed the certification for workers 
of the subject firm located in Waterville, Maine.
    New findings show that production at the Hawthorn Shirt plant of 
Warnaco Men's Apparel Division in Ciales, Puerto Rico is integrated 
with that of the Waterville, Maine plant. Substantial worker 
separations occurred in Ciales, Puerto Rico in 1994 resulting from a 
reduced demand from the Waterville plant.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to 
include the workers of the Ciales, Puerto Rico plant.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-30,177 is hereby issued as 
follows:
    ``All workers of Warnaco Men's Apparel Division in Waterville, 
Maine and Ciales, Puerto Rico who became totally or partially separated 
from employment on or after July 25, 1993, are eligible to apply for 
adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed at Washington, D.C., this 10th day of February 1995.
Victor J. Trunzo,
Program Director, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-4022 Filed 2-16-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 
APRIL 4, 1999 MSX INTERNATIONAL, INC. 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-04-1999
<CASH>                                           3,642
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  230,905
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,435
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               244,833
<PP&E>                                          90,013
<DEPRECIATION>                                (54,513)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 381,665
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          167,326
<BONDS>                                        198,754
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           36,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                    (24,810)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   381,665
<SALES>                                        399,488
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               399,488
<CGS>                                          315,184
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  315,184
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,466
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,659
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,179
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,729
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,450
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,450
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-50811

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ISMAEL FLORES-UMANA,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-95-CR-188-ALL

- - - - - - - - - -

February 20, 1997

Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ismael Flores-Umana appeals his sentence after his guilty

plea and conviction of being a deported alien. He argues that

the district court abused its discretion when it departed

upwardly from the Sentencing Guidelines and that the court failed

to give adequate reasons for the departure. We have reviewed the

record and the briefs of the parties and hold that the district

court did not abuse its discretion and that it gave adequate

reasons for the upward departure. United States v. Hawkins, 87 
No. 96-50811

- 2 -

F.3d 722, 728 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 408 (1996);

United States v. Lambert, 984 F.2d 658, 662 (5th Cir. 1993) (en

banc).

AFFIRMED.