alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                  9
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                              97
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              11
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                              0
<ALLOWANCE>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     135
<DEPOSITS>                                           0
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                 94
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                          38
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                     135
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                      0
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    2
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                     2
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                                2
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    170
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (234)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        (234)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (234)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (10.99)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        


</TABLE>
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

No. 11-0275

WEEKLEY HOMES, L.P. D/B/A DAVID WEEKLEY HOMES, WEEKLEY HOMES BUSINESS TRUST, DAVID WEEKLEY AND RANDY BRADEN, Petitioners

v. 

LEN RAO, Respondent

On Petition for Review

**ORDERED:**

1. Petitioners’ emergency motion to stay proceedings, filed April 15, 2011, is granted.  All trial court proceedings in Cause No. CC-10-01067-B, styled *Len Rao v. Weekley Homes, L.P. d/b/a David Weekley Homes, Weekley Homes Business Trust, David Weekley and Randy Braden*, in the County Court at Law No 2 of Dallas County, Texas, are stayed pending further order of this Court.

2.The petition for review remains pending before this Court.

Done at the City of Austin, this May 06, 2011.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

Supreme Court of Texas

By Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk
#### J. H. STOCKTON v. H. R. LENOIR, Trustee.

(Filed 15 June, 1931.)

Trial I) a — Judgment as of nonsuit in favor of party ui>on whom was the burden of proof held error.

Where upon the evidence and admissions of record the defendant may show by parol evidence that plaintiff’s commissions as selling agent were to be confined to payment out of notes given the principal as a part of the purchase price of the lands sold, the burden of proof is upon the defendant, and his motion as of nonsuit on the plaintiff’s evidence should be denied. (See *8. o.,*198 N. C., 148.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *MacRae, Special Judge,*at November Term, 1930, of MacoN.

Civil action to recover commissions on sale of real estate, evidenced by two notes, each containing the following stipulation: “To be paid out of funds from corresponding note of W. D. Almazov and Sophie Albert, when collected.”

• At the close of plaintiff’s evidence judgment as in ease of nonsuit was entered on motion of defendant, from which the plaintiff appeals, assigning error.

*George B. Patton, Edwards & Leakherwood and R. D. Sislc for plaintiff.*

*T. J. Johnston and Moody & Moody for defendant.*

Stagy, C. J.

The facts aré fully set out in the first appeal as reported in 198 N. C., 148, 150 S. E., 886, to which reference may be had to avoid repetition.

We there held that, while the stipulation appearing on the face of each of the notes did not *ipsissimis verbis*provide for payment exclusively out of funds to be collected from corresponding note of the purchasers, . Almazov and Albert, yet, in view of the allegations of the answer, taken in connection with the stipulations appearing in the notes, *89it was open to tbe defendant to sbow by parol, .if be could, tbat sucb was tbe understanding of tbe parties. Unless tbe defendant is able to establish tbis under tbe principles announced in *Bank v. Winslow,*193 N. C., 470, 137 S. E., 320, *Typewriter Co. v. Hardware Co.,*143 N. C., 97, 55 S. E., 417, and *Evans v. Freeman,*142 N. C., 61, 54 S. E., 847, he will not be in position to resist an adverse verdict.

With tbe defendant thus required to handle tbe laboring oar, it was error to nonsuit on tbe plaintiff’s evidence.

Reversed.
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 0.14 -0.16 4% -4%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

September 15, 2023

Category of Change: Coverage of Employment or Earnings, or Inclusion of Other Sources of Revenue

Summary Measures and Graphs

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: F1. Starting in 2024, cover newly hired State and local government employees.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision
Year Cost Rate

Income 

Rate

Annual 

Balance

2008 11.20 12.77 1.57 359

2009 11.26 12.81 1.55 369

2010 11.34 12.82 1.49 380

2011 11.47 12.84 1.37 389

2012 11.67 12.87 1.19 395

2013 11.90 12.90 1.00 400

2014 12.14 12.91 0.77 403

2015 12.39 12.93 0.54 404

2016 12.66 12.95 0.29 403

2017 12.93 12.97 0.04 401

2018 13.18 12.99 -0.19 398

2019 13.44 13.01 -0.43 393

2020 13.70 13.03 -0.68 387

2021 13.95 13.04 -0.91 381

2022 14.18 13.06 -1.13 373

2023 14.41 13.07 -1.34 364

2024 14.63 13.09 -1.54 355

2025 14.84 13.10 -1.74 345

2026 15.03 13.11 -1.92 334

2027 15.22 13.13 -2.09 322

2028 15.40 13.14 -2.26 309

2029 15.55 13.15 -2.40 296

2030 15.69 13.16 -2.53 282

2031 15.81 13.17 -2.64 268

2032 15.90 13.18 -2.73 254

2033 15.98 13.18 -2.80 239

2034 16.02 13.19 -2.84 224

2035 16.05 13.19 -2.86 209

2036 16.07 13.19 -2.88 194

2037 16.07 13.19 -2.88 179

2038 16.06 13.19 -2.87 164

2039 16.03 13.19 -2.84 148

2040 16.00 13.19 -2.80 133

2041 15.96 13.19 -2.76 118

2042 15.92 13.19 -2.72 102

2043 15.88 13.19 -2.68 87

2044 15.84 13.19 -2.65 71

2045 15.80 13.19 -2.61 56

2046 15.77 13.19 -2.58 40

2047 15.75 13.19 -2.56 25

2048 15.73 13.19 -2.54 9

2049 15.71 13.19 -2.52 ----

2050 15.70 13.19 -2.51 ----

2051 15.70 13.19 -2.51 ----

2052 15.70 13.19 -2.51 ----

2053 15.71 13.19 -2.52 ----

2054 15.72 13.19 -2.53 ----

2055 15.74 13.19 -2.55 ----

2056 15.76 13.19 -2.57 ----

2057 15.79 13.20 -2.59 ----

2058 15.81 13.20 -2.61 ----

2059 15.83 13.20 -2.63 ----

2060 15.86 13.20 -2.65 ----

2061 15.88 13.20 -2.68 ----

2062 15.90 13.21 -2.70 ----

2063 15.93 13.21 -2.72 ----

2064 15.95 13.21 -2.74 ----

2065 15.98 13.21 -2.77 ----

Detailed Single Year Tables

Category of Change: Level of Monthly Benefits (PIA)

Proposed Provision: Reduce benefits by 5 percent for those newly eligible for benefits in 2009 and later

Expressed as a percentage of taxable payrol Trust Fund 

Ratio 

1-1-year
2066 16.01 13.21 -2.80 ----

2067 16.04 13.22 -2.83 ----

2068 16.07 13.22 -2.85 ----

2069 16.10 13.22 -2.88 ----

2070 16.14 13.22 -2.92 ----

2071 16.18 13.22 -2.95 ----

2072 16.21 13.23 -2.99 ----

2073 16.25 13.23 -3.02 ----

2074 16.29 13.23 -3.06 ----

2075 16.32 13.23 -3.09 ----

2076 16.36 13.24 -3.13 ----

2077 16.41 13.24 -3.17 ----

2078 16.45 13.24 -3.21 ----

2079 16.49 13.24 -3.25 ----

2080 16.54 13.25 -3.29 ----

2081 16.58 13.25 -3.33 ----

2082 16.62 13.25 -3.37 ----

2083 16.67 13.25 -3.41 ----

2084 16.71 13.26 -3.45 ----

2085 16.75 13.26 -3.49 ----

Summarized Rates: OASDI

2008 Cost Rate Income Rate

Actuarial 

Balance

-2082 15.00% 13.91% -1.09% 0.60%

Office of the Chief Actuary, Social Security

Estimates based on Intermediate Assumptions of the 2008 Trustees Report

Change in 

Actuarial Balance

July 17, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 33 (Friday, February 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9341]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3990]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Division of Research Grants; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
Division of Research Grants Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meetings:

    Purpose/Agenda: To review individual grant applications.
    Name of SEP: Chemistry and Related Sciences.
    Date: March 3, 1995.
    Time: 1:00 p.m.
    Place: NIH, Westwood Building, Room 318A, Telephone Conference.
    Contact Person: Dr. Alec Liacouras, Scientific Review 
Administrator, 5333 Westbard Ave., Room 318A, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
(301) 594-7264.

    Name of SEP: Biological and Physiological Sciences.
    Date: March 10, 1995.
    Time: 1:30 p.m.
    Place: NIH, Westwood Building, Room 418A, Telephone Conference.
    Contact Person: Dr. Anne Clark, Scientific Review Administrator, 
5333 Westbard Ave., Room 418A, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-7115.

    Name of SEP: Chemistry and Related Sciences.
    Date: March 8, 1995.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. (noon).
    Place: NIH, Westwood Building, Room 335, Telephone Conference.
    Contact Person: Dr. Edward Zapolski, Scientific Review 
Administrator, 5333 Westbard Ave., Room 335, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
(301) 594-7302.

    Name of SEP: Chemistry and Related Sciences.
    Date: March 15, 1995.
    Time: 2:00 p.m.
    Place: NIH, Westwood Building, Room 335, Telephone Conference.
    Contact Person: Dr. Edward Zapolski, Scientific Review 
Administrator, 5333 Westbard Ave., Room 335, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
(301) 594-7302.
    The meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by 
the grant review cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 9, 1995.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 95-3990 Filed 2-16-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

 

# **CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporationby reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 of HF Financial Corp.,pertaining to the HF Financial Corp. 2002 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, the1991 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, the 1996 Director Restricted Stock Plan,and the Retirement Savings Plan of our report dated July 30, 2004, accompanyingthe consolidated statement of financial condition of HF Financial Corp. as ofJune 30, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’equity, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended June 30,2004.

 
|   | /s/  McGladrey & Pullen, LLP |   |
|--------|----------------------------------|--------|

 

Sioux Falls, South Dakota

September 23, 2005

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 27 (Thursday, February 9, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 7712-7713]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3271]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT

22 CFR Part 226


Administration of Assistance Awards to U.S. Non-Governmental 
Organizations

AGENCY: Agency for International Development (USAID).

ACTION: Correction to interim final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to the interim final rule 
which was published Thursday, January 19, 1995 (60 FR 3743). The rule 
relates to the administration of assistance awards to U.S. Non-
Governmental Organizations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 9, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Diana Joan Esposito, Office of Procurement, Procurement Policy and 
Evaluation (M/OP/P), USAID, SA-14 Rm. 1600I, 320 21st Street, 
Washington, DC 20523. Telephone 703 875-1529, Fax 703-875-1243.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On January 19, 1995, USAID issued an interim final rule at 22 CFR 
part 226 which implemented Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 
Circular A-110.

Need for Correction

    As published, the preamble refers to a change that was not 
implemented in the interim final rule.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication on January 19, 1995 of the interim 
final rule, is corrected as follows:

Preamble [Corrected]

    On page 3744, in the first column, at the paragraph beginning 
``Section 226.22(l) is revised to provide * * *'' is corrected to read: 
``Section 226.22(l) is revised to provide that USAID may authorize 
recipients to retain all interest earned in accordance with USAID's 
statutory authority.'' The statement in the preamble that interest 
earned will be remitted to USAID has been deleted. [[Page 7713]] With 
this correction, the preamble and the rule at 226.22(l) are in 
agreement.

    Dated: January 27, 1995.
Michael D. Sherwin,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Management.
[FR Doc. 95-3271 Filed 2-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6116-01-M
## Detailed Single Year Tables

- Individual Provisions
- Trust Fund Investment in Equities

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						G2: Invest 40 percent of the OASI and DI Trust Fund reserves in equities (phased in 2024-2038), assuming an ultimate 4.8 percent annual real rate of return on equities.**

### Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NASB Financial, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Rhonda Nyhus, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.


August 13, 2004             By:  /s/ Rhonda Nyhus
                                 Rhonda Nyhus
                                 Vice President and Treasurer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to NASB Financial, Inc. and will be retained by NASB
Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.



This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein , and not for any
other purpose.

<Page>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3606 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3606

To amend title 38, United States Code, to eliminate the requirement to 
  specify an effective period of a transfer of Post-9/11 educational 
           assistance to a dependent, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 9, 2022

   Mr. Tuberville (for himself, Mr. Thune, Mr. Rubio, and Mr. Braun) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to eliminate the requirement to 
  specify an effective period of a transfer of Post-9/11 educational 
           assistance to a dependent, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF REQUIREMENT TO SPECIFY AN EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF 
              A TRANSFER OF POST-9/11 EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE TO A 
              DEPENDENT.

    Section 3319(e) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by adding ``and'' after the 
        semicolon;
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``; and'' and inserting a 
        period; and
            (3) by striking paragraph (3).
                                 <all>
```
#### *CLYDE*F. FLEMMING et al. v. THE CITY OF ASHEVILLE et al.

(Filed 4 January, 1933.)

Injunctions D lb — Pacts upon which temporary restraining order is dissolved should he set out in the judgment.

Where a temporary order restraining a municipal corporation from enforcing an ordinance is dissolved without findings of fact in the judgment or record so that the Supreme Oourt can ascertain the grounds upon which the restraining order was dissolved, the judgment will be reversed and the case remanded to the end that another hearing may be had and that the facts may be set out in the judgment.

Afpbal by plaintiffs from *Olemenl, J.,*at August Term, 1932, of BuNCOMbe.

Reversed and remanded.

This is an action *to*restrain and enjoin the defendants from enforcing against the plaintiffs, an ordinance of the city of Asheville, on the ground (1) that plaintiffs are not included within the terms and provisions of the ordinance; and (2) that if plaintiffs are included within the terms and provisions of the ordinance, the said ordinance is void, for that it contravenes certain provisions of the Constitution of North Carolina, and of the United States.

From judgment dissolving a temporary restraining order issued in the action, the plaintiff appealed to the Supreme Court.

*811
      *Edward H. McMahan for plaintiffs.*

*J. G. Merrimon and Devere Lentz for defendants.*

Connor, J.

Issues of fact are sharply raised by the pleadings in this action. The evidence at the hearing of the motion of plaintiffs that the temporary restraining order be made permanent, was contradictory as to material facts. No findings of fact appear in the judgment or in the record. We are unable to determine in the present state of the record upon what ground the temporary restraining order was dissolved.

A city ordinance dealing with a matter of great importance to the public as well as to operators of motor buses on the streets of the towns and cities of this State, is involved in this action. The validity of the ordinance is challenged on the ground that some of its terms and provisions are unconstitutional. It does not now appear that the validity of the ordinance is necessarily presented by this appeal. *Goldsboro v. Supply Co.,*200 N. C., 405, 157 S. E., 58, and cases cited.

The judgment is reversed and the action remanded to the Superior Court of Buncombe County, to the end that another hearing may be had. The facts on which the judgment is rendered should be found, and set out in the judgment.

Eeversed and rémanded.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 22-0727

RASTA K. DOUGLAS WALID

Petitioner and Appellant

v.

STATE OF MONTANA, ATTORNEY GENERAL, 

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, 

CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES DIVISION, 

OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE

Respondents and Appellees

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for extension of time, there being 

no objection from the Appellant, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to 

and including April 24, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellee’s

opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

March 20 2023

03/20/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0727
Order filed February 19, 2015

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00765

- CV

____________ ALAVOOR VASUDEVAN , Appellant

V.

DEEPA VASUDEVAN , Appellee

On Appeal from the 300th District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 63935



### ORDER

On January 27, 2015 , appellant filed a brief that is not in compliance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. In particular, appellant has failed to provide adequate citations to the record and to authority. Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(f), (h). Accordingly, we order appellant’s brief filed January 27, 2015, stricken. Appellant is ordered to file a brief that complies with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure within ten (10) days of the date of this order. See Tex. R. App. P. 38. 1.If appellant files another brief that does not comply with Rule 38, the Court

may strike the brief, prohibit appellant from filing another, and proceed as if appellant had failed to file a brief. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.9(a). Pursuant to Texas
Rule o f Appellate Procedure 38.8(a), where an appellant has failed to file a brief, we may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. If appellant fails to timely file a brief in accordance with Rule 38, the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. S ee Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jamison, Busby and Brown.