9328 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 33 / Friday, February 17, 1995 / Notices

additional treatment of MCB Camp

Pendleton effluent would be provided

by City of Oceanside sewage treatment

plants.

Alternatives currently under

consideration that will be addressed in

the EIS/EIR include construction of a

new tertiary sewage treatment plant at

MCB Camp Pendleton, upgrade and

consolidation of existing sewage

treatment plants, injection wells,

percolation ponds, and no action.

Alternative pipeline alignments will

also be evaluated.

Major environmental issues that will

be addressed in the EIS/EIR include

land use, hydrology, water quality, air

quality, biological resources, cultural

resources, noise, traffic/circulation/

access, public services and utilities,

human health and safety, and hazardous

materials and waste management.

The Department of the Navy

published a Notice Of Intent in the

Federal Register on September 26, 1991,

initiating a scoping process for

preparation of an EIS/EIR for a sewage

effluent compliance project at MCB

Camp Pendleton for the San Onofre and

Santa Margarita Basins. A scoping

meeting was held in the City of

Oceanside on October 17, 1991, and an

EIS/EIR was begun. Since that time, the

proposed action has been revised as

additional studies have been

undertaken, and additional alternatives

have been identified that needed to be

evaluated. While the EIS/EIR for the San

Onofre basin is continuing, the EIS/EIR

for the Santa Margarita basin is

beginning. Therefore, the scoping

process is being reopened until March 6,

1995, in order to collect additional

comments on the scope of issues to be

addressed in the EIS/EIR for the Santa

Margarita basin proposed action.

However, no additional scoping

meetings will be held.

Agencies and the public are invited

and encouraged to provide written

comment on scoping issues. To be most

helpful, scoping comments should

clearly describe specific issues or topics

which the commentor believes the EIS/

EIR should address. Written statements

and or questions regarding the scoping

process should be mailed no later than

March 6, 1995 to Commanding Officer,

Southwest Division, Naval Facilities

Engineering Command, 1220 Pacific

Highway, San Diego, California 92132–

5190, (Attn: Ms. Sheila Donovan, Code

2032), telephone (619) 532–3624.

Dated: February 13, 1995.

Robert Watkins,

Colonel, USMC, Head, Land Use and Military

Construction Branch, Facilities and Services

Division, Installations and Logistics

Department.

[FR Doc. 95–3983 Filed 2–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3810–AE–P

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. EG95–30–000, et al.]

Austin Cogeneration Partners, L.P., et

al.; Electric Rate and Corporate

Regulation Filings

February 10, 1995.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Austin Cogeneration Partners, L.P.

[Docket No. EG95–30–000]

On February 6, 1995, Austin

Cogeneration Partners, L.P.

(‘‘Applicant’’) filed with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission an

application for determination of exempt

wholesale generator status pursuant to

18 CFR Part 365.

Applicant is a Delaware limited

partnership formed to acquire an

ownership interest in a 255 MW natural

gas-fired cogeneration facility to be

located in the City of Austin, Texas,

and/or operate such facility and engage

in project development activities with

respect thereto.

Comment date: March 6, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice. The

Commission will limit its consideration

of comments to those that concern the

adequacy or accuracy of the application.

2. Louis Dreyfus Electric Power, Inc.

[Docket No. ER92–850–010]

Take notice that on January 26, 1995,

Louis Dreyfus Electric Power, Inc.

(Louis Dreyfus) filed information

required by the Commission’s December

2, 1992 letter order in Docket No. ER92–

850–000. Copies of Louis Dreyfus’

informational filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

3. North American Energy

Conservation, Inc.

[Docket No. ER94–152–004]

Take notice that on January 30, 1995,

North American Energy Conservation,

Inc. (North American) filed information

required by the Commission’s February

10, 1994 letter order in Docket No.

ER94–152–000. Copies of North

American’s informational filing are on

file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection.

4. Howell Power Systems, Inc.

[Docket No. ER94–178–004]

Take notice that on January 30, 1995,

Howell Power Systems, Inc. (Howell

Power) filed information required by the

Commission’s January 14, 1994 letter

order in Docket No. ER94–178–000.

Copies of Howell Power’s informational

filing are on file with the Commission

and are available for public inspection.

5. LG&E Power Marketing, Inc.

[Docket No. ER94–1188–004]

Take notice that on January 30, 1995,

LG&E Power Marketing, Inc. (LG&E)

filed information required by the

Commission’s August 19, 1994 order in

Docket No. ER94–1188–000. Copies of

LG&E’s informational filing are on file

with the Commission and are available

for public inspection.

6. Valero Power Services Co.

[Docket No. ER94–1394–002]

Take notice that on January 30, 1995,

Valero Power Services (Valero Power)

filed information required by the

Commission’s August 24, 1994 letter

order in Docket No. ER94–1394–000.

Copies of Valero Power’s informational

filing are on file with the Commission

and are available for public inspection.

7. Coastal Electric Services Co.

[Docket No. ER94–1450–001]

Take notice that on January 30, 1995,

Coastal Electric Services Company

(Coastal Services) filed information

required by the Commission’s

September 29, 1994 letter order in

Docket No. ER94–1450–000. Copies of

Coastal Services’ informational filing are

on file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection.

8. Calpine Power Marketing

[Docket No. ER94–1545–000]

Take notice that on February 8, 1995,

Calpine Power Marketing, Inc. (CPMI),

filed an amendment to its petition to the

Commission for acceptance of CPMI

Revised Rate Schedule FERC No. 1; the

granting of certain blanket approvals,

including the authority to sell electricity

at market-based rates; and the waiver of

certain Commission regulations. CPMI

is a direct subsidiary of Calpine

Corporation which, through other

subsidiaries, owns and operates nonutility generating facilities and related

business ventures in the United States.

Calpine Corporation is indirectly and

partially owned by CS Holding of
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 33 / Friday, February 17, 1995 / Notices 9329

Zurich, Switzerland, which, through

other subsidiaries, owns utility

generating facilities in Europe, financial

service providers and other entities.

Comment date: February 24, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

9. Gulfstream Energy, LLC

[Docket No. ER94–1597–001]

Take notice that on January 30, 1995,

Gulfstream Energy, LLC (Gulfstream)

filed information required by the

Commission’s November 21, 1994 letter

order in Docket No. ER94–1597–000.

Copies of Gulfstream’s informational

filing are on file with the Commission

and are available for public inspection.

Standard Paragraphs

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street N.E.,

Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance

with Rules 211 and 214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR

385.214). All such motions or protests

should be filed on or before the

comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–3980 Filed 2–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Docket No. ER93–327–002, et al.]

Florida Power & Light Co., et al.;

Electric Rate and Corporate Regulation

Filings

February 9, 1995.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Florida Power & Light Co.

[Docket No. ER93–327–002]

Take notice that on February 1, 1995,

Florida Power & Light Company (F&L),

tendered for filing its compliance refund

report in the above-referenced docket.

Comment date: February 23, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

2. Wisconsin Electric Power Co.

[Docket No. ER95–299–000]

Take notice that on February 1, 1995,

Wisconsin Electric Power Company

tendered for filing an amendment in the

above-referenced docket.

Comment date: February 23, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

3. Wickland Power Services

[Docket No. ER95–300–000]

Take notice that on February 6, 1995,

Wickland Power Services tendered for

filing an amendment in the abovereferenced docket.

Comment date: February 23, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

4. Allegheny Power Service Corp. on

behalf of Monongahela Power Co., and

the Potomac Edison Co.

[Docket No. ER95–468–000]

Take notice that on January 20, 1995,

Allegheny Power Service Corporation

on behalf of Monongahela Power

Company, The Potomac Edison

Company and West Penn Power

Company (The APS Companies), filed

Standard Transmission Service

Agreements to add AES Power, Inc.

PECO Energy and Electric

Clearinghouse, Inc. to The APS

Companies’ Standard Transmission

Service Rate Schedule which has been

accepted for filing by the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission. The proposed

effective date when customers may take

service under the proposed rate

schedule is January 2, 1995.

Copies of the filing have been

provided to the Public Utilities

Commission of Ohio, the Pennsylvania

Public Utility Commission, and the

West Virginia Public Service

Commission.

Comment date: February 23, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

5. Madison Gas and Electric Co.

[Docket No. ER95–494–000]

Take notice that on January 30, 1995,

Madison Gas and Electric Company

(MGE), tendered for filing a service

agreement with InterCoast Power

Marketing Company under MGE’s

Power Sales Tariff. MGE requests an

effective date of February 1, 1995.

Comment date: February 23, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

6. Kentucky Utilities Co.

[Docket No. ER95–529–000]

Take notice that on February 1, 1995,

Kentucky Utilities Company (KU),

tendered for filing a series of rate

schedule amendments to all of the

agreements under which KU makes

coordination sales in order to assure

recovery of the incremental cost of

emission allowances associated with

coordination sales.

Comment date: February 23, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street NE.,

Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance

with Rules 211 and 214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR

385.214). All such motions or protests

should be filed on or before the

comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–3979 Filed 2–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Project No. 2493–006–WA]

Puget Sound Power & Light Co; Notice

of Intent to Hold a Public Meeting in

Snoqualmie, Washington, and a Public

Meeting in Kirkland, Washington, to

Discuss Staff’s Draft Environmental

Impact Statement (DEIS) for the

Snoqualmie Falls Hydroelectric Project

February 13, 1995.

On November 15, 1994, the

Commission staff mailed the

Snoqualmie Falls DEIS to the

Environmental Protection Agency,

resource and land management

agencies, and interested organizations

and individuals. This documents

evaluates the environmental

consequences of operating the

applicant’s existing 42-megawatt (MW)

hydroelectric project, located on the

Snoqualmie River, approximately 25

miles east of Seattle in western

Washington.

The applicant proposes extensive

structural modifications of the existing

project facilities and construction of

additional project facilities needed to

expand the project from 42 MW to 72