alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1








Certification
of CEO pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Lisa
Y. Roskens, Chief Executive Officer of the general partner of the General
Partner of America First Tax Exempt Investors, L.P. (the “Company”), certify
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that:





(1)
The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended June
30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.








Date:  August
7, 2009


/s/ Lisa Y.
Roskens


Lisa Y.
Roskens


Chief
Executive Officer


Burlington
Capital Group LLC, acting in its capacity as general partner of the General
Partner of America First Tax Exempt Investors, L.P.








A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to America First Tax Exempt Investors, L.P. and will be retained by
America First Tax Exempt Investors, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
32.2








Certification
of CFO pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I,
Michael J. Draper, Chief Financial Officer of the general partner of the General
Partner of America First Tax Exempt Investors, L.P. (the “Company”), certify
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that:





(1)
The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended June
30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.








Date:  August
7, 2009


/s/ Michael J.
Draper


Michael
J. Draper


Chief
Financial Officer


Burlington
Capital Group LLC, acting in its capacity as general partner of the General
Partner of America First Tax Exempt Investors, L.P.








A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to America First Tax Exempt Investors, L.P. and will be retained by
America First Tax Exempt Investors, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 

August 11, 2009 

E R R A T A

Appeal No. 2008-5034 WEEKS MARINE V US

Decided: August 10, 2009 Precedential Opinion 

Please make the following changes: 

 On page 15, line 19, the word “an” immediately after “contemplates” should be 

deleted. 

Page 26, line 2: change “Week” to --Weeks--.
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum

opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain

computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of

Appeals and does not include the filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 JAMES MICHAEL GALLEGOS,

3 Plaintiff-Appellant,

4 v. NO. 32,857

5 GEO GROUP, INC., GUADALUPE

6 COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY,

7 TIM HATCH, ERASMO BRAVO, JOHN W.

8 BEARD, JOHNNY JONSON, ALSONSO

9 GARCIA, JOE GARCIA, JANIE YEARLY,

10 REBECCA HATCH, P. ARAGON, P. CHAVEZ,

11 DINAH SANDOVAL, TRUDY JIM, J. VIGIL,

12 BRENDA COPELAND, and JUNNIE DAVIS,

13 in their individual and official capacities, et. al.,

14 Defendants-Appellees.

15 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF GUADALUPE COUNTY

16 Abigail Aragon, District Judge

17 James Michael Gallegos

18 Rancho de Taos, NM 

19 Pro Se Appellant

20 Yenson, Allen & Wosick, P.C.

21 Megan L. Jahner

22 Patrick D. Allen
2

1 Albuquerque, NM

2 for Appellees

3 MEMORANDUM OPINION

4 GARCIA, Judge.

5 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reason stated in the notice of

6 proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed,

7 and the time for doing so has expired.

8 Affirmed.

9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

10 

11 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge

12 WE CONCUR:

13 

14 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

15 

16 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge
3
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 5 (Monday, January 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 2402]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-412]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION
[Finance Docket No. 32647]


Fieldcrest Cannon, Inc. and Downeast Securities

Corporation--Continuance in Control--Canadian American Railroad 
Company

AGENCY: Interstate Commerce Commission.

ACTION: Notice of Exemption.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, under 49 U.S.C. 10505, exempts from the prior 
approval requirements of 49 U.S.C. 11343-11345, the continuance in 
control by Fieldcrest Cannon, Inc. and Downeast Securities Corporation 
(collectively, petitioners) of Canadian American Railroad Company 
(CDAC), upon CDAC becoming a rail common carrier. Petitioners presently 
control Bangor and Aroostook Railroad Company. The exemption is subject 
to standard labor protective conditions.

DATES: This exemption will be effective on December 30, 1994. Petitions 
to reopen must be filed by January 19, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Send pleadings referring to Finance Docket No. 32647 to: (1) 
Office of the Secretary, Case Control Branch, Interstate Commerce 
Commission, 1201 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20423; and 
(2) James E. Howard, One International Place, Boston, MA 02110.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beryl Gordon, (202) 927-5610. [TDD for 
the hearing impaired: (202) 927-5721].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Commission's decision. To purchase a copy of the full decision, write 
to, call, or pick up in person from: Dynamic Concepts, Inc., room 2229, 
Interstate Commerce Commission Building, 1201 Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20423. Telephone: (202) 289-4357-4359. [Assistance for 
the hearing impaired is available through TDD services at (202) 927-
5721].

    Decided: December 30, 1994.

    By the Commission, Chairman McDonald, Vice Chairman Morgan, and 
Commissoners Simmons and Owen. Commissioner Owen did not participate 
in the disposition of this proceeding.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-412 Filed 1-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7035-01-P
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DONNIE MONROE

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 2 02 4

- 0476

[ May 23, 2024 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.8 00 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seven t eenth J udicial Circuit, Broward County ; Andrew L. Siegel

, J udge; L.T. Case No. 15

- 3612 CF 10 A

.

Donnie Monroe

, Cross City

, pro se

.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY

, G ERBER and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Opinion filed Sep tember 2 4, 2009



### In The 

# Eleven th Court of Appeals

___________ 

### No. 1 1- 09 -0 00 73 -CV

____ ____ __ OWL CREEK O PERATI NG CO., INC.; DALLAS O&G ENE RGY GR OUP , L .P .; AN D O WL C REE K WEST , L .L. C. , A ppellant s V. SOD A S PRINGS PA RTN ERS , L .P . A ND GOLD EN CHE EK

VEN TURES, L. P. , A ppellee s On App eal from the 29th Distric t Court P alo P into Coun ty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. C42419

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellants have filed i n t h i s court a notice of dismissal. Appellants state that they have de po sit e d wit h th e cle rk of the tr ia l c ourt

the amou

nt o we d und e r t

he jud g me nt. Th e a

pp e a l is dismiss ed.
PER C URI AM September 24, 2009 Panel consists of: Wright, C.J ., M c C a l l , J. , an d

S tr an g e , J.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

OBXTEK INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee

SALIENT CRGT, INC.,

Defendant

______________________

2018-2119

______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims 

in No. 1:17-cv-01849-EJD, Senior Judge Edward J. 

Damich.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

MICHELLE ERIN LITTEKEN, PilieroMazza PLLC, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. 

 WILLIAM JAMES GRIMALDI, Commercial Litigation 

Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also 

represented by JOSEPH H. HUNT, ROBERT EDWARD 
KIRSCHMAN, JR., DOUGLAS K. MICKLE; CHARLES 

MCCARTHY, Office of Regional Counsel, United States General Services Administration, San Francisco, CA.

_____________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

 PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, SCHALL and 

MOORE, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 May 23, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
#### STERLING LUMBER COMPANY v. N. W. ABERNATHY, Sheriff of CHEROKEE COUNTY and R. C. MOORE; and R. C. MOORE v. J. W. RUTHERFORD and STERLING LUMBER COMPANY.

(Filed 27 January, 1932.)

Appeal and Error F 1) — Where no exceptions to referee’s report are made, ' a correct judgment entered thereon will be affirmed on appeal.

Where a party in an action which has been referred to a referee makes no exception to the referee’s-report he is entitled to judgment only in accordance with the report, and a correct judgment entered thereon will be affirmed, and he may not contend that he is entitled to a relief which is not supported by the findings of fact or the conclusions of law of the referee.

Appeal by Henry McAden, trustee for the heirs at law of E. Y. McAden and Mary T. McAden, intervener, from *Harwood, 'Special Judge,*at April Term, 1931, of Chekokee.

Affirmed.

At November Term, 1929, of the Superior Court of Cherokee County, the above entitled actions then pending in said court, were consolidated and referred for trial.

At January Term, 1930, by an order of said court, Henry McAden, trustee for the heirs at law of E. Y. McAden and Mary T. McAden, intervened in the action entitled “E. C. Moore *v.*J. *W.*Eutherford *et al."*and thereafter filed his pleading therein.

The consolidated actions were heard by the referee who filed his report on 13 December, 1930. This report came on for.Hearing at April Term, 1931, and was in all respects confirmed. There were no exceptions to the findings of fact or conclusions of law set out in said report.

From judgment in accordance with the report of the referee, the in-tervener, Henry McAden, trustee, appealed to the Supreme Court.

*220
      *M. W. Bell for appellant.*

*L. B. Prince for appellee.*

Pee Cueiam.

There was no error in the refusal of the judge to sign the judgment tendered by the intervener. The contention of the in-tervener that he was entitled to judgment on the bond executed by the Sterling Lumber Company as principal, and Columbia Casualty Company, as surety, to R. 0. Moore, cannot be sustained. There is no finding of fact or conclusion of law in the report of the referee to support this contention. The intervener did not except to the report of the referee, and for this reason is entitled to judgment only in accordance with the report.

There is no error in the judgment signed by the judge. It is in accordance with the report of the referee and is, therefore,

Affirmed.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT NORB ER TO JR . TOJINO LEANO, Pe titione r, v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 13-72702 Age n c y No. A098-467-399 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d Oc tobe r 14, 2015 * * B e fore : SILVERM AN, B YB EE, a nd WATFORD, C irc uit Judge s. Norbe rto Jr. Tojino Le ano, a native an d c itiz e n of the Philippine s, pe titions for re vie w of the B o a

rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r dism issing his a ppe a l from

an im m igration judge ’ s de c ision de ny ing his a pplic at ion for a sy lum and withholding of re

m o va l . W e have jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e 

# FIL ED OCT 21 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).re vie w for substa ntia l e vide nc e the a ge nc y ’ s fa c tua l findings, Ze haty e v . Gonzale s , 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th C ir. 2006), a nd we de ny

the pe t ition for re vie w. Substa ntia l e v i de nc e supports the B IA’ s c onc lusion tha

t Le an o’ s e xpe rie nc e s in the Philippine s did not rise to the le ve l of pe rse c ution. Se e Hox ha v
. Ashc roft , 319 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th C ir. 2003) (unfulfille d thre ats c onstitute d ha ra ssm e nt, not pe rse c ution). Substa

ntia l e vide nc e a lso supports the B IA’ s de te rm ination tha

t Le ano fa ile d to e sta

b lish a n obje c tive ly

re a sona ble fe ar of future ha

rm in the Philippine s. S

e e Gu v . Gonzale

s , 454 F.3d 1014, 1022 (9th C i r. 2006) (pe titione r fa ile d to “pre se nt c om

pe lling, obje c tive e v ide nc e de m onstra ting a we ll-founde d fe ar of pe rse c ution” ). W e re je c t Le ano’ s c onte ntion tha t the B IA a

pplie d a n inc o rre c t le ga l sta n da rd. Thus, Le ano’ s a s y lum c la im fa ils. B e c a use Le ano fa i le d to e sta

blish e ligibility

for a sy lum , he ne c e ssa

rily fa ile d to m e e t the m ore stringe nt sta nda rd for withholding of rem ova l. Se e Ze haty e , 453 F.3d at 1190. PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D.

1 3 - 7 2 7 0 2 2
EXHIBIT 32.2

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO\
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Online Vacation Center Holdings Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Edward B. Rudner, Principal Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: May 13, 2008


/s/ Edward B. Rudner
--------------------
Edward B. Rudner
Principal Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DWIGHT RUTLEDGE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 479 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of February, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
**
EXHIBIT 23 

February 28, 2018 

Ms. StaceyHollabaugh 

XTO Energy Inc. 

210 E 7th Street 

Fort Worth, TX 76102 

Re:        CRT Consent Letter 

Dear Ms. Hollabaugh: 

This letter is toconfirm that Miller and Lents, Ltd. (M&L) authorizes XTO Energy Inc. (XTO) to use our name and report dated January 31, 2018 related to the Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) for use in the electronic filing of the CRT Annual Report on Form 10-K with the SEC. 

Please provide us with an exact copy of the Annual Report on Form 10-K as electronically filed with the SEC. 

Yours very truly, 

MILLER AND LENTS, LTD. 

Texas Registered Engineering Firm No. F-1442

 
By /S/ KATIE M. REINAKER 
Katie M. Reinaker, P. E.

Senior VicePresident

KMR 
**
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

# AGENCY:

National Science Foundation.

# ACTION:

Notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation of 1978, Public Law 95-541.

# SUMMARY:

The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. This is the required notice.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Nature McGinn, ACA Permit Officer, Division of Polar Programs, Rm. 755, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. Or by email:                         *ACApermits@nsf.gov*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On January 7 & 8, 2016 the National Science Foundation published notices in the                     **Federal Register**                     of a permit application received. The permits were issued on February 8, 2016 to:                

1. Ari S. Friedlaender Permit No. 2016-024

2. Michael Gooseff Permit No. 2016-018

Nadene G. Kennedy,

Polar Coordination Specialist, Division of Polar Programs.

[FR Doc. 2016-02835 Filed 2-11-16; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual Balance 

in 75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

-2.00% -4.34% 0.48% 0.00% -1.52% -4.34%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2009 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary, Social Security

August 26, 2009

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Trust Fund Investment in Equities

Proposed Provision: Invest 40 percent of the Trust Funds in equities (phased in 2010-2024), assuming an 

ultimate 5.4 percent real rate of return on equities

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this provision

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Year

Percent

Cost rates with this provision

Cost rates under present law

Income rates with this provision

Income rates under present law

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

 (assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Year

Percent

Present law With this provision
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, James S. Murphy, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Hypertension Diagnostics, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 12, 2004    /s/ James S. Murphy   James S. Murphy