10578 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 38 / Monday, February 27, 1995 / Notices

3See, 42 FERC ¶ 61,019 (1988).

approximately 750 Dth per day.

Applicant states that the revised cost of

the downsized meter station was

$396,239 which was reimbursed by

Washington Natural.

Applicant holds a blanket

transportation certificate pursuant to

Part 284 of the Commission’s

Regulations issued in Docket No. CP86–

578–000. 3 Applicant states that there is

no significant impact on Applicant’s

system peak day deliveries resulted

from the redesigned facilities since

Applicant’s total firm obligation for

deliveries to Washington Natural

remains unchanged. Applicant states

that construction of the proposed

delivery point is not prohibited by its

existing tariff, and that the requirements

to be served via this meter station will

result in no significant increase in

annual throughput on Applicant’s

system.

Comment date: April 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph G

at the end of this notice.

2. Questar Pipeline Company

Docket No. CP95–201–000

Take notice that on February 13, 1995,

Questar Pipeline Company (Questar

Pipeline), 79 South State Street, Salt

Lake City, Utah 84111, filed in Docket

No. CP95–201–000 a request pursuant to

§§ 157.205 and 157.212 of the

Commission’s Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205,

157.212) for authorization to convert

existing exempt facilities, installed and

operated under 18 CFR 157.53 to

Natural Gas Act § 7(c) delivery point

facilities and operate same as fully

certificated transmission facilities under

Questar Pipeline’s blanket certificate

issued in Docket No. CP82–491–000

pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas

Act, all as more fully set forth in the

request that is on file with the

Commission and open to public

inspection.

Questar Pipeline proposes to convert

facilities in Uinta County, Wyoming.

These facilities consist of one four-inch

tap, one two-inch Daniel Senior meter

run, approximately 400 feet of four-inch

buried pipeline, electronic flowmeasurement and telemetry equipment,

and minor yard and station piping.

Comment date: April 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph G

at the end of this notice.

3. K N Interstate Gas Transmission

Company

[Docket No. CP95–203–000]

Take notice that on February 14, 1995,

K N Interstate Gas Transmission

Company (K N Interstate), P.O. Box

281304, Lakewood, Colorado 80228–

8304, filed in Docket No. CP95–203–

000, a request pursuant to §§ 157.205

and 157.212 of the Commission’s

Regulations under the Natural Gas Act

(18 CFR 157.205 and 157.212) for

authorization to establish three new

delivery taps for its affiliate, K N

Energy, Inc., (K N), a local distribution

company, for ultimate sale to various

retail customers, under K N Interstate’s

blanket certificate issued in Docket Nos.

CP83–140–000 and CP83–140–001 and

Section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act, all

as more fully set forth in the request

which is on file with the Commission

and open to public inspection.

K N Interstate proposes new delivery

taps to be located in Phelps, Fillmore,

and Howard Counties, Nebraska. K N

Interstate states that the proposed taps

will deliver twenty-two, eighteen, and

thirty-six Mcf on a peak day,

respectively, and 710, 590, and 360 Mcf

annually, respectively. K N Interstate

estimates that the Phelps County tap

and the Fillmore County tap will both

cost $850 to construct. K N Interstate

further estimates that the Howard

County tap will cost $1,150 to construct.

K N Interstate indicates that the

proposed facilities will not have an

adverse impact on its existing

customers.

K N Interstate advises that the

volumes of gas which will be delivered

at each of these proposed delivery taps

will be within the current maximum

daily transportation quantity set forth in

K N Interstate’s transportation service

agreement with K N. K N Interstate

further advises that the addition of the

delivery taps is not prohibited by its

existing tariff.

Comment date: April 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph G

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

G. Any person or the Commission’s

staff may, within 45 days after issuance

of the instant notice by the Commission,

file pursuant to Rule 214 of the

Commission’s Procedural Rules (18 CFR

385.214) a motion to intervene or notice

of intervention and pursuant to

§ 157.205 of the Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a

protest to the request. If no protest is

filed within the time allowed therefor,

the proposed activity shall be deemed to

be authorized effective the day after the

time allowed for filing a protest. If a

protest is filed and not withdrawn

within 30 days after the time allowed

for filing a protest, the instant request

shall be treated as an application for

authorization pursuant to Section 7 of

the Natural Gas Act.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–4674 Filed 2–24–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Docket No. EG95–31–000 et al.]

CNG Power Services Corporation, et

al. Electric Rate and Corporate

Regulation Filings

February 17, 1995.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. CNG Power Services Corporation

[Docket No. EG95–31–000]

On February 10, 1995, CNG Power

Services Corporation (CNGPS), One

Park Ridge Center, P.O. Box 15746,

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222, filed

with the Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission (Commission) an

application for a new determination of

exempt wholesale generator status, due

to changed circumstances resulting from

certain proposed transactions, pursuant

to part 365 of the Commission’s

regulations. The application states that

the Commission previously determined

that CNGPS is an exempt wholesale

generator. See CNG Power Services

Corporation, 69 FERC ¶ 61,002 (1994).

Comment date: March 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice. The

Commission will limit its consideration

of comments to those that concern the

adequacy or accuracy of the application.

2. Catex Vitol Electric Inc.

[Docket No. ER94–155–005]

Take notice that on February 3, 1995,

Catex Vitol Electric Inc. (Catex) filed

information as required by the

Commission’s January 14, 1994 order in

Docket No. ER94–155–000. Copies of

Catex’s filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

3. PSI Energy, Inc.

[Docket No. ER95–323–000]

Take notice that on February 8, 1995,

PSI Energy, Inc. (PSI), tendered for filing

an amendment to filing it made in this

docket on December 22, 1994. The

amendment consists of two parts. First,

PSI has filed Exhibits AEE and G of the

Transmission and Local Facilities

Ownership, Operation and Maintenance

Agreement (T&LF Agreement) among

PSI, Wabash Valley Power Association

(WVPA) and the Indiana Municipal

Power Agency (IMPA). Second, PSI has
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 38 / Monday, February 27, 1995 / Notices 10579

provided further explanation regarding

section 7.4.3 of the T&LP Agreement.

Copies of this filing have been served

on the Indiana Utility Regulatory

Commission, WVPA, IMPA, the Public

Utility Commission of Ohio and the

Public Service Commission of the State

of Kentucky.

Comment date: March 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

4. Southern California Edison Company

[Docket No. ER95–556–000]

Take notice that on February 6, 1995,

Southern California Edison Company

(Edison), tendered for filing Firm

Transmission Service Agreement (FTS

Agreement):

Firm Transmission Service Agreement

(Victorville-Lugo/Midway) Between

Southern California Edison Company And

M–S–R Public Power Agency

The FTS Agreement sets forth the

terms and conditions under which

Edison has agreed to provide M–S–R

with 150 megawatts (MW) of firm

transmission service from the midpoint

of the Victorville-Lugo transmission line

(Victorville-Lugo Midpoint) to the

Midway Substation and 150 MW of

interruptible transmission service from

Midway Substation to the VictorvilleLugo Midpoint. Edison requests the

Commission to assign to the FTS

Agreement an effective date of May 1,

1995.

Copies of this filing were served upon

the Public Utilities Commission of the

State of California and all interested

parties.

Comment date: March 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

5. Jersey Central Power & Light

Company Metropolitan Edison

Company Pennsylvania Electric

Company

[Docket No. ER95–557–000]

Take notice that on February 6, 1995,

GPU Service Corporation (GPU), on

behalf of Jersey Central Power & Light

Company, Metropolitan Edison

Company and Pennsylvania Electric

Company (jointly referred to as the GPU

Operating Companies), filed an

amendment to the Purchase and Sale

Agreement between GPU and Niagara

Mohawk Power Corporation, dated as of

July 1, 1969, as amended. The purpose

of this abbreviated filing is to provide an

explanation of the treatment of the cost

of emission allowances.

GPU has served copies of the filing on

regulatory agencies in New Jersey and

Pennsylvania.

Comment date: March 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

6. Jersey Central Power & Light

Company Metropolitan Edison

Company Pennsylvania Electric

Company

[Docket No. ER95–558–000]

Take notice that on February 6, 1995,

GPU Service Corporation (GPU), on

behalf of Jersey Central Power & Light

Company, Metropolitan Edison

Company and Pennsylvania Electric

Company (jointly referred to as the GPU

Operating Companies), filed an

amendment to the GPU Power Pooling

Agreement. The purpose of this

abbreviated filing is to provide an

explanation of the treatment of the cost

of emission allowances.

GPU has served copies of the filing on

regulatory agencies in New Jersey and

Pennsylvania.

Comment date: March 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

7. Wisconsin Electric Power Company

[Docket No. ER95–559–000]

Take notice that on February 6, 1995,

Wisconsin Electric Power Company

(Wisconsin Electric or the Company),

tendered for filing revisions to its

coordination rate schedules between

itself and a number of present and

prospective wholesale energy

purchasers. The revisions would allow

Wisconsin Electric to recoup the cost of

sulphur dioxide emission allowances

associated with the production of

energy under these agreements and rate

schedules. Under the federal Clean Air

Act (42 U.S.C. Section 7401 et seq.),

Wisconsin Electric would assume

liability for the costs of procurement of

these emission allowances. The rate

revisions would allow reimbursement,

in cash or in kind, up to 100% of the

replacement cost in all service

schedules using incremental costs.

Energy purchasers would be allowed to

defer reimbursement of emission

allowances until such time as the

Company must surrender emission

allowances to the federal Environmental

Protection Agency.

The filing designates the Cantor

Fitzgerald Environmental Brokerage

Service as the Company’s monthly

market index to be used in instances

where the energy purchaser decides to

reimburse Wisconsin Electric in cash.

The submittal also explains Wisconsin

Electric’s least cost plan that

incorporates the Clean Air Act’s

reduced utilization provisions for Phase

1 affected units may cause the

Company’s cost recovery to be less than

total replacement cost.

Wisconsin Electric respectfully

requests an effective date of April 1,

1995.

Copies of the filing have been served

on all affected wholesale purchasers, the

Michigan Public Service Commission,

and the Public Service Commission of

Wisconsin.

Comment date: March 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

8. PacifiCorp

[Docket No. ER95–560–000]

Take notice that on February 7, 1995,

PacifiCorp, tendered for filing in

accordance with 18 CFR Part 35 of the

Commission’s Rules and Regulations,

Amendatory Agreement No. 2 to the

PNW AC Intertie Capacity Ownership

Agreement between PacifiCorp and

Bonneville Power Administration

(Bonneville) which was previously filed

in this Docket.

PacifiCorp requests a waiver of prior

notice and that an effective date of

January 1, 1995 be assigned to

Amendatory Agreement No. 2.

Copies of this filing were supplied to

Bonneville, the Washington Utilities

and Transportation Commission and the

Public Utility Commission of Oregon.

Comment date: March 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

9. PacifiCorp

[Docket No. ER95–561–000]

Take notice that on February 7, 1995,

PacifiCorp, tendered for filing in

accordance with 18 CFR Part 35 of the

Commission’s Rules and Regulations, a

supplemental filing to PacifiCorp’s Rate

Schedule FERC No. 164.

Copies of this filing were supplied to

the City of Redding, California, the

Washington Utilities and Transportation

Commission, the Public Utility

Commission of Oregon and the Public

Utilities Commission of the State of

California.

Comment date: March 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

10. PacifiCorp

[Docket No. ER95–562–000]

Take notice that on February 7, 1995,

PacifiCorp, tendered for filing in

accordance with 18 CFR Part 35 of the

Commission’s Rules and Regulations,

Amendatory Agreement No. 1 to the

South Idaho Exchange Agreement,

Contract No. DE–MS79–89BP92524,

between PacifiCorp and Bonneville

Power Administration (Bonneville),

PacifiCorp Rate Schedule FERC No. 256.
10580 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 38 / Monday, February 27, 1995 / Notices

Copies of this filing were supplied to

Bonneville, the Washington Utilities

and Transportation Commission and the

Public Utility Commission of Oregon.

Comment date: March 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

11. PacifiCorp

[Docket No. ER95–563–000]

Take notice that on February 7, 1995,

PacifiCorp, tendered for filing in

accordance with 18 CFR Part 35 of the

Commission’s Rules and Regulations,

Revision No. 1 to Exhibit C of the AC

Intertie Transmission Agreement,

Contract No. DE–MS79–94BP94285,

(Agreement) between PacifiCorp and

Bonneville Power Administration

(Bonneville), PacifiCorp Rate Schedule

FERC No. 370.

PacifiCorp requests a waiver of prior

notice and that an effective date of

January 1, 1995 be assigned to Revision

No. 1 to Exhibit C of the Agreement.

Copies of this filing were supplied to

Bonneville, the Washington Utilities

and Transportation Commission and the

Public Utility Commission of Oregon.

Comment date: March 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

12. Interconnection Agreement Between

CEI and the PJM Group

[Docket No. ER95–564–000]

Take notice that on February 7, 1995,

the Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland

(PJM) Interconnection Association filed,

on behalf of the signatories to the PJM

Interconnection Agreement Exhibit A of

Schedule 6.02 of the Interconnection

Agreement Between CEI and the PJM

Group. The purpose of this abbreviated

filing is to provide an explanation of the

PJM Group’s treatment of the cost of

emission allowances.

Comment date: March 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

13. Interconnection Agreement Between

The NYPP Group and the PJM Group

[Docket No. ER95–565–000]

Take notice that on February 7, 1995,

the Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland

(PJM) Interconnection Association filed,

on behalf of the signatories to the PJM

Interconnection Agreement Exhibit A of

Schedule 5.02 of the Interconnection

Agreement Between the NYPP Group

and the PJM Group. The purpose of this

abbreviated filing is to provide an

explanation of the PJM Group’s

treatment of the cost of emission

allowances.

Comment date: March 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

14. Interconnection Agreement Between

The APS Group and the PJM Group

[Docket No. ER95–566–000]

Take notice that on February 7, 1995,

the Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland

(PJM) Interconnection Association filed,

on behalf of the signatories to the PJM

Interconnection Agreement Exhibit A of

Schedule 6.02 of the Interconnection

Agreement Between the APS Group and

the PJM Group. The purpose of this

abbreviated filing is to provide an

explanation of the PJM Group’s

treatment of the cost of emission

allowances.

Comment date: March 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

15. Interconnection Agreement Between

Virginia Power and the PJM Group

[Docket No. ER95–567–000]

Take notice that on February 7, 1995,

the Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland

(PJM) Interconnection Association filed,

on behalf of the signatories to the PJM

Interconnection Agreement Exhibit A of

Schedule 6.02 of the Interconnection

Agreement Between Virginia Power and

the PJM Group. The purpose of this

abbreviated filing is to provide an

explanation of the PJM Group’s

treatment of the cost of emission

allowances.

Comment date: March 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

16. Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland

Interconnection (PJM) Agreement

[Docket No. ER95–568–000]

Take notice that on February 7, 1995,

the Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland

(PJM) Interconnection Association filed,

on behalf of the signatories to the PJM

Agreement Exhibit A of Schedule 6.01

of the PJM Interconnection Agreement.

The purpose of this abbreviated filing is

to provide an explanation of the

treatment of the cost of emission

allowances.

Comment date: March 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

17. Montana Power Company

[Docket No. ER95–569–000]

Take notice that on February 7, 1995,

The Montana Power Company

(Montana), tendered for filing with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

pursuant to 18 CFR 35.13 a ‘‘Unit

Contingent Capacity and Associated

Energy Sales Agreement Between The

Montana Power Company and

Associated Power Services, Inc.’’;

Montana requests that the Commission:

(i) Accept the Agreement for filing, to be

effective on February 8, 1995; and (ii)

grant waiver of notice to allow filing of

the Agreement less than 60 days prior

to commencement of service.

A copy of the filing was served upon

Associated Power Services, Inc.

Comment date: March 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

18. Tampa Electric Company

[Docket No. ER95–575–000]

Take notice that on February 9, 1995,

Tampa Electric Company (Tampa

Electric) tendered for filing a Service

Schedule J (Negotiated Interchange

Service) and a Letter of Commitment

with the City of Gainesville, Florida.

The Service Schedule J and Letter of

Commitment supplement the existing

agreement for interchange service

between Tampa Electric and

Gainesville.

Tampa Electric proposes an effective

date of April 30, 1995, for the Service

Schedule J and Letter of Commitment.

Copies of the filing have been served

on Gainesville and the Florida Public

Service Commission.

Comment date: March 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

19. Wisconsin Public Service

Corporation

[Docket No. ER95–576–000]

Take notice that Wisconsin Public

Service Corporation (WPSC) of Green

Bay, Wisconsin on February 8, 1995,

tendered for filing revisions to its

coordination rate schedules to provide

for the recovery of the costs of SO2

emission allowances. WPSC has asked

the Commission to permit a January 1,

1995 effective date for these revisions.

WPSC states that the filing has been

served on the affected parties and

posted as required by the Commission’s

regulations.

Comment date: March 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

20. Tampa Electric Company

[Docket No. ER95–577–000]

Take notice that on February 9, 1995,

Tampa Electric Company (Tampa

Electric) tendered for filing new and

revised tariff sheets for inclusion in its

FERC Electric Tariff, First Revised

Volume No. 1 (AR–1 Tariff) and a

request for waiver of the Commission’s

fuel adjustment clause regulations.

Tampa Electric proposes to modify

the fuel adjustment clause in the AR–1

Tariff to allow for the recovery of a

share of the buy-out costs that it

incurred to terminate a long-term coal
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 38 / Monday, February 27, 1995 / Notices 10581

supply agreement. Tampa Electric states

that its purchase of replacement coal at

more favorable prices will provide

cumulative savings to its customers in

excess of the cumulative buy-out costs

that Tampa Electric proposes to recover

through its fuel adjustment clause.

Tampa Electric proposes an effective

date of April 1, 1995 for the tendered

tariff sheets, and therefore requests

waiver of the Commission’s notice

requirement.

Copies of the filing have been served

on each of Tampa Electric’s AR–1 Tariff

customers and the Florida Public

Service Commission.

Comment date: March 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

21. Madison Gas and Electric Company

[Docket No. ER95–578–000]

Take notice that on February 9, 1995,

Madison Gas and Electric Company

(MGE) tendered for filing a service

agreement with Heartland Energy

Services, Inc., under MGE’s Power Sales

Tariff. In addition, MGE and Heartland

request cancellation of previous

agreements between the parties since

the new service agreement replaces the

need for the earlier agreements. MGE

requests a cancellation date of February

1, 1995.

Comment date: March 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

22. Arizona Public Service Company

[Docket No. ER95–579–000]

Take notice that on February 8, 1995,

Arizona Public Service Company (APS)

tendered for filing revised estimated

load Exhibits applicable under the

following rate schedules:

APS–FPC/FERC No. Customer name Exhibit

141 ................................ Aguila Irrigation District ......................................................................................................................... Exhibit ‘‘II’’.

126 ................................ Electrical District No. 6 .......................................................................................................................... Exhibit ‘‘II’’.

158 ................................ Roosevelt Irrigation District ................................................................................................................... Exhibit ‘‘II’’.

168 ................................ Maricopa Water District ......................................................................................................................... Exhibit ‘‘II’’.

155 ................................ Buckeye Water Conservation and Drainage District ............................................................................ Exhibit ‘‘II’’.

142 ................................ McMullen Valley Water Conservation and Drainage District ................................................................ Exhibit ‘‘II’’.

140 ................................ Electrical District No. 8 .......................................................................................................................... Exhibit ‘‘II’’.

153 ................................ Harquahala Valley Power District ......................................................................................................... Exhibit ‘‘II’’.

Current Rate levels are unaffected,

revenue levels are unchanged from

those currently on file with the

Commission, and no other significant

change in service to these or any other

customer results from the revisions

proposed herein. No new or

modifications to existing facilities are

required as a result of these revisions.

A copy of this filing has been served

on the above customers and the Arizona

Corporation Commission.

Comment date: March 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

23. Kentucky Utilities Company

[Docket No. ER95–580–000]

Take notice that on February 10, 1995,

Kentucky Utilities Company (KU)

tendered for filing a Transmission

Agreement between KU and East

Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc.

Comment date: March 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

24. York County Energy Partners, L.P.

[Docket No. QF95–229–000]

On January 31, 1995, York County

Energy Partners, L.P., (applicant), c/o

York County Energy Partners (I), 7201

Hamilton Boulevard, Allentown,

Pennsylvania 18195–1501, submitted

for filing an application for certification

of a facility pursuant to § 292.207(b) of

the Commission’s Regulations. No

determination has been made that the

submittal constitutes a complete filing.

According to the applicant, the

topping-cycle cogeneration facility will

be located in York County,

Pennsylvania and will consist of a

single circulating fluidized boiler and

an extraction/condensing steam turbine

generator. Steam recovered from the

facility will be used by the P.H.

Glatefelter Company, which

manufactures high quality specialty

papers, such as books, postage stamps,

maps, and disposable surgical gowns.

The primary energy source will be

bituminous coal. The maximum net

electric power production capacity will

be 227 MW. The facility is expected to

begin commercial operation in January

1998.

Comment date: Thirty days after the

date of publication of this notice in the

Federal Register, in accordance with

Standard Paragraph E at the end of this

notice.

Standard Paragraphs

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, N.E.,

Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance

with Rules 211 and 214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR

385.214). All such motions or protests

should be filed on or before the

comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–4673 Filed 2–24–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Docket No. QF95–220–000]

Central Wayne Energy Recovery,

Limited Partnership; Notice of

Supplement to Filing

February 21, 1995.

On February 14, 1995, Central Wayne

Energy Recovery, Limited Partnership

(Applicant) tendered for filing a

supplement to its filing in this docket.

No determination has been made that

the submittal constitutes a complete

filing.

The supplement provides additional

information pertaining primarily to the

technical data and the ownership

structure of the small power production

facility.

Any person desiring to be heard or

objecting to the granting of qualifying

status should file a motion to intervene

or protest with the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission, 825 North

Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.

20426, in accordance with rules 211 and

214 of the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure. All such

motions or protests must be filed by

March 14, 1995, and must be served on

the applicant. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in