alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**
**EXHIBIT 32**

**Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge: 

 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and 

 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Trust. 

 
  Simmons Bank,  Trustee for Cross Timbers Royalty TrustMarch 12, 2020  By 
/S/ NANCY WILLIS
   Nancy Willis   Vice President**
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-13-00089-CV

IN RE CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 10, 2013

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

This court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for 

temporary relief. The court is of the opinion that the relief should be denied. TEX. R. APP. P.

52.8(a). Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary relief 

are denied. Relator shall pay all costs incurred in this proceeding.

PER CURIAM

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 7,637, styled Ramirez v. ConocoPhillips Company, pending in the 49th 

Judicial District Court, Zapata County, Texas, the Honorable Jose A. Lopez presiding.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

National Security Agency, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The National Security Agency hereby gives notice of its intent to grant Nguran Corporation a revocable, non-assignable, exclusive, license to practice the following Government-Owned invention as described and claimed in United States Patent Application No.14/120,606 entitled: “Satisfiability Filter and Query Tool and Method of Building a Satisfiability Filter and Query Tool,” filed on June 9, 2014 and any related non-provisional patent applications and all Letters Patent issuing thereon, and any continuation, continuation-in-part or division of said non-provisional patent application and any reissue or extension of said Letters Patent.

# DATES:

Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license has until February 22, 2016 to file written objections including evidence and argument that establish that the grant of the license would not be consistent with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.

# ADDRESSES:

Written objections are to be filed with the National Security Agency Technology Transfer Program, 9800 Savage Road, Suite 6843, Fort George G. Meade, MD 20755-6843.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Linda L. Burger, Director, Technology Transfer Program, 9800 Savage Road, Suite 6843, Fort George G. Meade, MD 20755-6843, telephone (443) 634-3518.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The prospective exclusive license will comply with the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The patent rights in this invention have been assigned to the United States Government as represented by the National Security Agency.

Dated: February 2, 2016.

Aaron Siegel,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2016-02238 Filed 2-4-16; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 36 (Thursday, February 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10106-10107]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4431]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation 337-TA-367]


Certain Facsimile Machines and Components Thereof; Notice of 
Initial Determination Terminating Respondent on the Basis of Settlement 
Agreement

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice is hereby given that the Commission has received an 
initial [[Page 10107]] determination from the presiding administrative 
law judge in the above captioned investigation terminating the 
following respondent on the basis of a settlement agreement: Samsung 
Electronics, Co, Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This investigation is being conducted 
pursuant to section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 
Sec. 1337). Under the Commission's rules, the presiding officer's 
initial determination will become the determination of the Commission 
thirty (30) days after the date of its service upon the parties, unless 
the Commission orders review of the initial determination. The initial 
determination in this matter was served upon parties on February 13, 
1995.
    Copies of the initial determination, the settlement agreement, and 
all other nonconfidential documents filed in connection with this 
investigation are available for inspection during official business 
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 
20436, telephone (202) 205-1802. Hearing impaired individuals are 
advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting 
the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810.

WRITTEN COMMENTS: Interested persons may file written comments with the 
Commission concerning termination of the aforementioned respondents. 
The original and 14 copies of all such documents must be filed with the 
Secretary to the Commission, 500 E Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 
20436, no later than 10 days after publication of this notice in the 
Federal Register. Any person desiring to submit a document (or portions 
thereof) to the Commission in confidence must request confidential 
treatment. Such requests should be directed to the Secretary to the 
Commission and must include a full statement of the reasons why 
confidential treatment should be granted. The Commission will either 
accept the submission in confidence or return it.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ruby J. Dionne, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Telephone (202) 205-
1802.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: February 13, 1995.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-4431 Filed 2-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
**Exhibit 32.02**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the GoRemote Communications, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the quarterly period ended January 31, 2005, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“Report”), I, Daniel W.Fairfax, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge based on a reviewof the Report: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periodcovered by the Report.
| Date: March 14, 2005 | By:      | /s/ DANIEL W.  FAIRFAX                                    |
|---------------------------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |     | Daniel W. Fairfax                                         |
|                      | * * | Senior Vice President & Chief Financial  Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to GoRemote and will be retained byGoRemote and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9665]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4203]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Business Development Center Applications: Shreveport, LA

AGENCY: Minority Business Development Agency, Commerce.

ACTION: Cancellation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Minority Business Development Agency (MBDA) is cancelling 
the announcement to solicit competitive applications under its Minority 
Business Development Center (MBDC) Program to operate the Shreveport, 
Louisiana MBDC. This solicitation was originally published in the 
Federal Register, Thursday, November 3, 1994, Vol. 59, No. 212 55079.

  11.800 Minority Business Development Center

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance)

    Dated: February 13, 1995.
Donald L. Powers,
Federal Register Liaison Office, Minority Business Development Agency.
[FR Doc. 95-4203 Filed 2-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-21-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CHICAGO
TITLE CORPORATION'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT 03/31/99 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE 3 MONTHS THEN ENDED.  (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER
SHARE DATA)
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         1,026,626
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      35,048
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               1,061,874
<CASH>                                         244,086
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,955,626
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                631,190
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 21,467
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,830
<OTHER-SE>                                     445,895
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,955,626
<PREMIUMS>                                     471,610
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             16,607
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               1,034
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                      29,817
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           424,494
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 35,140
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,951
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             23,189
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,189
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.06
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### G. H. JORDAN, Administrator, v. SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY COMPANY.

(Filed 20 October, 1926.)

1. Negligence — Evidence—Attractive Nuisance.

In the absence of evidence tending to show that a child was not injured at the place of an “attractive nuisance” alleged to have caused the injury in suit, it was insufficient to be submitted to the jury.

2. Evidence — Conjecture.

Evidence is insufficient to take the case to the jury Which merely raises a conjecture or suspicion.

Civil ACTION, tried before *Barnhill, J.,*and a jury, at April Term, 1926, of WaKE.

This action was instituted to recover damages for the wrongful death of plaintiff’s intestate, James Jordan, who was a bright boy of the age of five and a half years. At the conclusion of all the testimony judgment of nonsuit was entered and the plaintiff appealed.

*Douglass & Douglass for plaintiff.*

*Murray Allen for defendant.*

Per CuriaM.

The complaint specifies four eléments of negligence, to wit: First, that the defendant, for several years, had permitted children to play on or near the main line, at Cary, at a place where the *376signal pipes were located; second, tbat tbe defendant did not stop its train or reduce its speed so as to prevent tbe killing of tbe child; third, tbat tbe defendant’s employees in charge of tbe train did not keep a proper lookout; fourth, tbat tbe defendant failed to remove tbe child from tbe track or warn or notify tbe parents of tbe danger.

Upon a careful examination and scrutiny of tbe entire testimony tbe Court is of tbe opinion tbat there was no evidence of negligence warranting submission of tbe case to tbe jury. All tbe evidence‘was to tbe effect tbat tbe child was not injured at tbe pipes or while on tbe pipes, but at least a car-length from tbe pipes. So tbat, if tbe pipes bad constituted an “attraction to small children,” tbe plaintiff’s intestate was not injured on tbe pipes or by reason of tbe existence or location thereof.

Tbe plaintiff relies upon tbe cases of *Powell v. R. R.,*125 N. C., 370, and *Whitesides v. R. R.,*128 N. C., 229. In both of these cases there was evidence tbat tbe injured party was on tbe track at tbe time of receiving tbe injury complained of. In tbe *Whitesides case*tbe defendant admitted in its answer tbat tbe plaintiff was injured on tbe trestle.

There is no evidence in this record tbat tbe child was on tbe track at tbe time tbe train passed. There was no physical evidence on or about tbe engine showing tbat tbe child bad been struck by it, and tbe last time tbe child was seen before tbe injury shows “be bad moved” and “was standing along by tbe edge of tbe ballast line, five feet from tbe rail.”

Tbe evidence, viewed in its most favorable light to plaintiff, creates no more than a suspicion, or conjecture, which is not sufficient to warrant a submission of tbe question to a jury. *Brown v. Kinsey,*81 N. C., 245; *Seagrove v. Winston,*167 N. C., 207; *S. v. Prince,*182 N. C., 790; *S. v. Martin,*191 N. C., 404. Tbe judment as rendered is

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 33 (Friday, February 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9395]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3967]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Capital Region; National Capital Memorial Commission; 
Public Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act that a meeting of the National Capital Memorial 
Commission will be held on Tuesday, March 7, 1995, at 1 p.m., at the 
National Building Museum, room 312, 5th and F Streets, NW.
    The Commission was established by Public Law 99-652, the 
Commemorative Works Act, for the purpose of preparing and recommending 
to the Secretary of the Interior, Administrator, General Services 
Administration, and Members of Congress broad criteria, guidelines, and 
policies for memorializing persons and events on Federal lands in the 
National Capital Region (as defined in the National Capital Planning 
Act of 1952, as amended), through the media of monuments, memorials and 
statues. It is to examine each memorial proposal for adequacy and 
appropriateness, make recommendations to the Secretary and 
Administrator, and to serve as information focal point for those 
persons seeking to erect memorials on Federal land in the National 
Capital Region.
    The members of the Commission are as follows:

Director, National Park Service
Chairman, National Capital Planning Commission
The Architect of the Capitol
Chairman, American Battle Monuments Commission
Chairman, Commission of Fine Arts
Mayor of the District of Columbia
Administrator, General Services Administration
Secretary of Defense

    The purpose of the meeting will be to consider U.S. Reservation 201 
as the site for the Japanese American Memorial. The meeting will be 
open to the public. Any person may file with the Commission a written 
statement concerning the matters to be discussed. Persons who wish to 
file a written statement or testify at the meeting or who want further 
information concerning the meeting may contact the Commission at 202-
619-7097. Minutes of the meeting will be available for public 
inspection 4 weeks after the meeting at the Office of Land Use 
Coordination, National Capital Region, 1100 Ohio Drive, SW., room 201, 
Washington, DC 20242.

    Dated: February 8, 1995.
Robert Stanton,
Regional Director, National Capital Region.
[FR Doc. 95-3967 Filed 2-16-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
## Detailed Single Year Tables

- Individual Provisions
- Taxation of Benefits

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						H4: Increase the threshold for taxation of OASDI benefits to $50,000 for single filers and $100,000 for joint filers starting in 2025. Taxation of benefits revenues transferred to the Hospital Insurance (HI) Trust Fund would be the same as if the current-law computation applied.**

### Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program

### Summarized Estimates
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 28 (Friday, February 10, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 8112]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3490]





                Sunshine Act Meetings



Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 28 / Friday February 10, 1995 / 
Sunshine Act Meetings
[[Page 8112]] 




FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

Notice of Agency Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 10:01 a.m. on 
Tuesday, February 7, 1995, the Board of Directors of the Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation met in closed session to consider the 
following matters:

    Reports of the Office of Inspector General.
    Recommendation regarding the liquidation of a depository 
institution's assets acquired by the Corporation in its capacity as 
receiver, liquidator, or liquidating agent of those assets:

Memorandum re: Various Failed Depository Institutions Nationwide 
        (Case No. 550-01953-94-BOD)

    Matters relating to the Corporation's supervisory and corporate 
activities.

    In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Director 
Eugene A. Ludwig (Comptroller of the Currency), seconded by Vice 
Chairman Andrew C. Hove, Jr., concurred in by Director Jonathan L. 
Fiechter (Acting Director, Office of Thrift Supervision), and Chairman 
Ricki Tigert Helfer, that Corporation business required its 
consideration of the matters on less than seven days' notice to the 
public; that no earlier notice of the meeting was practicable; that the 
public interest did not require consideration of the matters in a 
meeting open to public observation; and that the matters could be 
considered in a closed meeting by authority of subsections (c)(2), 
(c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B), and (c)(10) of the 
``Government in the Sunshine Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2), (c)(4), 
(c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B), and (c)(10)).
    The meeting was held in the Board Room of the FDIC Building located 
at 550--17th Street, N.W., Washington, DC.

    Dated: February 7, 1995.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Patti C. Fox,

Acting Deputy Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95-3490 Filed 2-8-95; 11:29 am]

BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 33 (Friday, February 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9321]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4040]



========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 33 / Friday, February 17, 1995 / 
Notices

[[Page 9321]]

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE


Forms Under Review by Office of Management and Budget

February 10, 1995.
    The Department of Agriculture has submitted to OMB for review the 
following proposal for the collection of information under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) since 
the last list was published. This list is grouped into new proposals, 
revisions, extension, or reinstatements. Each entry contains the 
following information:
    (1) Agency proposing the information collection; (2) Title the 
information collection; (3) Form number(s), if applicable; (4) Who will 
be required or asked to report; (5) An estimate of the number of 
responses; (6) An estimate of the total number of hours needed to 
provide the information; (7) Name and telephone number of the agency 
contact person.
    Questions about the items in the listing should be directed to the 
agency person named at the end of each entry. Copies of the proposed 
forms and supporting documents may be obtained from: Department 
Clearance Officer, USDA, OIRM, Room 404-W Admin. Bldg., Washington, 
DC., 20250, (202) 690-2118.

Revision

<bullet> Agricultural Marketing Service
Cotton Classing, Testing, and Standards
CN-246, CN-247, CN-248, CN-357
Individuals or households; Businesses or other for-profit; 1299 
responses; 115 hours.
Elvis W. Morris, (901) 766-2921.
Larry K. Roberson,
Deputy Departmental Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-4040 Filed 2-16-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-01-M