alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Soil and Water Management Research: St. Paul, MN
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area St. Paul, Minnesota Soil and Water Management Research Research





- Baker, John
- Dalzell, Brent
- Water Availability and Watershed Management (211)
- Soil and Air (212)

Research Project: **Location:
                            Soil and Water Management Research** Project Number: 5062-12130-008-030-A
                        
                        Project Type: Cooperative Agreement Start Date: Mar 15, 2021
                        
                        End Date: Jul 31, 2023 **Objective:**
                        
                        Develop new technologies to map the impact of management practices on nitrate export to streams and ditches. **Approach:**
                        
                        Cooperator will use ArcGIS tools to map spatial nitrate concentration data collected during transects of small agricultural watersheds. The resulting maps will be used to assess which edge of field practices are most and least effective in reducing nitrate contamination, and also to test the ability of models to predict nitrate loss.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-50503

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

MELVIN JAMES SANFORD; 

GERALD ANTHONY HARRIS,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. W-96-CR-53-1

- - - - - - - - - -

April 30, 1998

Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Melvin James Sanford and Gerald Anthony Harris challenge the

sufficiency of the evidence to support their convictions for

conspiracy to possess crack cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. 

§ 846. Sanford’s argument that the Government failed to show that

he conspired to distribute crack cocaine is meritless, and his

conviction should not be reversed. United States v. Cartwright, 6

F.3d 294, 303 (5th Cir. 1993); United States v. Chavez, 119 F.3d
No. 97-50503

-2-

342, 347 (5th Cir. 1997). Harris’s argument that he was not part

of a conspiracy fails. See United States v. Teal, 582 F.3d 343,

345 (5th Cir. 1978).

Sanford challenges the legality of the search of his

residence. The warrant was supported by an affidavit which was

sufficiently particular as to the items to be seized. See United

States v. Layne, 43 F.3d 127, 132 (5th Cir. 1995). The business

cards were not under the ambit of the warrant, but they were

admissible under the plain view doctrine. Horton v. California,

496 U.S. 128, 136-37 (1990). The currency from the safes was not

admissible evidence under the plain view doctrine, but its

admission was harmless error given the testimony of Kenneth Brown

and Oscula Clayton, as well as other evidence which corroborated

Brown’s testimony. United States v. Rodriguez, 43 F.3d 117, 123

(5th Cir. 1995).

Harris’s and Sanford’s contention that the sentencing

enhancement provisions of 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A)(viii) violate

the Equal Protection Clause has been rejected by this court.

United States v. Cherry, 50 F.3d 338, 342-44 (5th Cir. 1995). One

panel of this court cannot overrule the decision of a prior panel

absent en banc reconsideration or a superseding contrary decision

of the Supreme Court. United States v. Arcs, 118 F.3d 335, 338

(5th Cir. 1997).

AFFIRMED
#### STATE v. WESTBROOK STRICKLAND.

(Filed 7 October, 1925.)

Appeal by defendant from *Lyon, J.,*at May Term, 1925, of SampsoN. No error.

*Attorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.*

*Fowler & Grumpier, C. L. Guy and J. F. Wilson for defendant.*

Pee CubiaM.

In an indictment containing three counts the defendant was charged with the unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquor in breach of C. S., vol. Ill, 3367 and 3411(b); with the unlawful possession of materials, substances, and property intended for use in breach of C. S., vol. Ill, 3411(d) ; and with the possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale in breach of 0. S., 3379. The jury returned for its verdict : “Guilty in the manner and form charged in the indictment.”

The assignments of error relate to the defendant’s motion to dismiss the action as in case of nonsuit; and to the trial judge’s failure to in*859struct tbe jury as to tbe defendant’s contentions and as to tbe legal significance of aiding and abetting. Neither exception can be sustained. There was sufficient evidence to sustain tbe verdict, and tbe charge is not made a part of tbe record. There is a presumption that it was correct, and it is incumbent on tbe appellant to show error. Tbe statute provides that tbe appellant shall cause to be prepared a concise statement of tbe case embodying tbe instructions of tbe judge if .there be an exception thereto in order that tbe Court may examine into tbe legal sufficiency of tbe instruction excepted to.

No error.
## Summary Measures and Graphs

- Individual Provisions
- Cost-of-Living Adjustment

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						A5: Starting December 2024, add 1 percentage point to the annual COLA for beneficiaries who have lived past a "specified age". The "specified age" is the sum of: (1) 65 and (2) the unisex cohort life expectancy at age 65.**

|  |  |
|--|--|
Order entered September 22 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 15

- 00974

- CR

MCCLAIN EDWARD GLICK MAN, Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Collin County, Texas Tria l Court Cause No. 002

- 87183

- 2014



### O RDER
The Court has before it appellant’s “motion seeking order of this court directing the filing with this court of evidentiary exhibit that was admitted into evidence as State’s Exhibit 2 during the suppression hearing .” We will treat this as a motion to supplement the record. As such, we
GRANT the motion.
We ORDER Kristen Kopp, official court reporter of the County Court at Law No. 2, to file, within TEN DAYS of the date of this order, a supplemental record containi ng State’s
Exhibit no. 2. We further ORDER Ms. Kopp to file a duplicate copy of the exhibit with the Collin County Clerk’s Office. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 34.6(h).
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to Kristen Kopp, official court reporter, Count y Court at Law No. 2, and to counsel for all parties.
/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Level of Monthly Benefits (PIA) | Description of Proposed Provision:      Beginning in 2010, increase the special minimum benefit by making the following changes: (a) A year of coverage is defined as a year in which 4 quarters of coverage are earned.  (b) At implementation, set the PIA for 30 years of coverage equal to 125 percent of the monthly poverty level (about $1,128 in 2009).  The PIA per year of coverage (after the first 10 years) would be $1,128/20 = $56.40.  (c) Index the initial PIA per year of coverage by wage growth for successive cohorts, so that the special minimum keeps up with the wage-indexed benefit formula. |
|---------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2009 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified November 4, 2009 |
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 37 (Friday, February 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 10351]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4530]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Washington State 
Advisory Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Washington State Advisory Committee to the Commission will be held 
on Wednesday, March 8, 1995, from 9:30 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. at the Sixth 
Avenue Inn, 2000 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98121. The purpose 
of the meeting is to review current civil rights developments in the 
State and plan future project activities.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Committee Chairperson William 
Wassmuth, 206-233-9136, or Philip Montez, Director of the Western 
Regional Office, 213-894-3437 (TDD 213-894-0508). Hearing-impaired 
persons who will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign 
language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least five 
(5) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, February 9, 1995.
Carol-Lee Hurley,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 95-4530 Filed 2-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3614 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3614

 To prohibit the importation of seafood and seafood products from the 
              Russian Federation, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 9, 2022

 Mr. Sullivan (for himself and Ms. Murkowski) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the importation of seafood and seafood products from the 
              Russian Federation, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``United States-Russian Federation 
Seafood Reciprocity Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress makes the following findings:
            (1) In 2014, the Russian Federation invaded and annexed the 
        Crimean Peninsula from Ukraine.
            (2) The United States and its allies imposed sanctions with 
        respect to the Russian Federation as a result of that hostile 
        and illegal action.
            (3) In retaliation, the Government of the Russian 
        Federation imposed an embargo on agricultural products, 
        including seafood, imported from the United States, the 
        European Union, Australia, Canada, and Norway.
            (4) Before imposing the embargo, the Russian Federation was 
        an important export market for United States seafood products.
            (5) Russian-origin seafood products continue to enter to 
        the United States market without restriction and imports of 
        such products increased roughly 173 percent in value between 
        2013, the year before the imposition of the embargo, and 2020.

SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON IMPORTATION OF SEAFOOD AND SEAFOOD PRODUCTS FROM 
              THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION.

     The importation into the United States from the Russian Federation 
of any article classifiable under chapter 3 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is prohibited.

SEC. 4. TERMINATION.

    The prohibition under section 3 shall terminate on the date on 
which the President determines and certifies Congress that the 
Government of the Russian Federation has terminated its prohibition on 
the importation of seafood products from the United States.

SEC. 5. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    Section 3 applies with respect to articles entered, or withdrawn 
from warehouse for consumption, on or after the date that is 15 days 
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LOURDES GARCIA-GARCIA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-70323

Agency No. A076-215-392

ORDER AMENDING

MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

The Memorandum Disposition in this appeal, filed on January 18, 2011, is

corrected as follows: 

Page 2, second paragraph: Replace <2009> with <1999> in the sentence

stating <The fact that she later conceded at an August 16, 2009, hearing that

she had twice been arrested for theft offenses does not demonstrate that she

did not have the requisite intent to deceive because her later honesty

occurred only after a certified record of her convictions had been entered in

the record.>.

We note that the error corrected is only typographical and reflects an error in

transcription. It did not in any way impact our resolution of the case. 

FILED

APR 12 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

The motion to recall the mandate is DENIED. No further motions or

petitions may be filed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

       CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NASB Financial, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Rhonda Nyhus, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.


August 9, 2007               By:  /s/ Rhonda Nyhus
                                 Rhonda Nyhus
                                 Vice President and Treasurer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to NASB Financial, Inc. and will be retained by NASB
Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.



This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein , and not for
any other purpose.

<Page>
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3587 

To modify conditions of funding for the distance learning, telemedicine, and 

broadband program of the Rural Utilities Service, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 7 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 3), 2022 

Mr. THUNE (for himself, Ms. SMITH, Mr. WICKER, and Mr. CASEY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To modify conditions of funding for the distance learning, 

telemedicine, and broadband program of the Rural Utilities Service, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Connect Unserved 

5 Americans Act of 2022’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DISTANCE LEARNING, TELEMEDICINE, AND 

7 BROADBAND PROGRAM. 

8 The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (Public 

9 Law 117–58) is amended in the third proviso under the 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3587 IS

1 heading ‘‘DISTANCE LEARNING, TELEMEDICINE, AND

2 BROADBAND PROGRAM’’ under the heading ‘‘RURAL UTIL3 ITIES SERVICE’’ under the heading ‘‘RURAL DEVELOP4 MENT PROGRAMS’’ under the heading ‘‘DEPART5 MENT OF AGRICULTURE’’ in title I of division J by 

6 striking ‘‘50 percent’’ and inserting ‘‘80 percent’’. 

7 SEC. 3. COORDINATION WITH TREASURY DEPARTMENT ON 

8 DISTRIBUTION OF BROADBAND DEPLOY9 MENT FUNDS. 

10 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 904(b) of division FF of 

11 the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (47 U.S.C. 

12 1308(b)) is amended— 

13 (1) in paragraph (1)(A)— 

14 (A) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

15 end; and 

16 (B) by adding at the end the following: 

17 ‘‘(iv) the Department of the Treasury; 

18 and’’; and 

19 (2) in paragraph (2)— 

20 (A) in subparagraph (B), by striking 

21 ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

22 (B) in subparagraph (C), by striking the 

23 period at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

24 (C) by adding at the end the following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3587 IS

1 ‘‘(D) the programs administered by the 

2 Department of the Treasury.’’. 

3 (b) DEADLINE.—Not later than 30 days after the 

4 date of enactment of this Act, the covered agencies (as 

5 defined in section 904(b) of division FF of the Consoli6 dated Appropriations Act, 2021 (47 U.S.C. 1308(b)), as 

7 amended by subsection (a) of this section) shall implement 

8 the amendments made by subsection (a) of this section. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 8412]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3623]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Information Collection Submitted to the Office of Management and 
Budget for Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act

    The proposal for the collection of information listed below has 
been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for approval 
under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 
35). Copies of the proposed collection of information and related forms 
may be obtained by contacting the Bureau's clearance officer at the 
phone number listed below. Comments and suggestions on the proposal 
should be made directly to the bureau clearance officer and to the 
Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (1076-
0106), Washington, DC 20503, telephone 202-395-7340.
    Title: Higher Education Grant Annual Report Form.
    OMB approval number: 1076-0106.
    Abstract: Information is collected to obtain facts on measurable 
program performance results with categorical data and ratios of program 
performance results with categorical data and ratios of supplementary 
funding programs consistent to stated goals and objectives.
    Bureau form number: None.
    Frequency: Annual.
    Description of respondents: Tribal, tribal organization or Bureau 
program administrators responsible for collection of data used in 
measuring program effectiveness.
    Estimated completion time: 3.0 hours.
    Annual Responses: 300.
    Annual burden hours: 900.
    Bureau clearance officer: Gail Sheridan 202-208-2685.

    Dated: October 19, 1994.
Reginald Rodriquez,
Chief, Branch of Post Secondary Education Programs.
[FR Doc. 95-3623 Filed 2-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-M