alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 4 (Friday, January 6, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 2083]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-313]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Meeting of the Commission on Roles and Missions of the Armed 
Forces

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Commission of Roles and Missions of the 
Armed Forces.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of a forthcoming meeting of the 
Commission on Roles and Missions of the Armed Forces. The Commission 
will meet in closed session from 12:30 p.m. until approximately 2:00 
p.m., and in open session from approximately 2:00 p.m. until 6:00 p.m.
    During the open part of the meeting, the Commission will consider a 
thematic framework for its task, discuss selected process issues, and 
receive a briefing from the Defense Logistics Agency. During the closed 
portion of the meeting, the Commission will address topics that require 
the disclosure and discussion of classified information, including 
counter-proliferation, information warfare and other classified issues.
    In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Public Law 92-453, as amended (5 U.S.C. App II), it has been 
determined that these portions of the Commission on Roles and Missions 
meeting concern matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1), and that, 
accordingly, the meeting will be closed to the public during these 
times.

DATES: January 11, 1995, 12:30 p.m. until 6:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Hyatt Regency Arlington, 1325 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, 
Virginia.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Commander Gregg Hartung, Director for Public Affairs, Commission on 
Roles and Missions, 1100 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1200F, Arlington, 
Virginia 22209; telephone (703) 696-4250.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Seating will be available on a first-come, 
first-served basis. Members of the press who with to reserve seating 
should contact Commander Gregg Hartung, Director for Public Affairs, in 
advance at (703) 696-4250.
    Extraordinary circumstances compel notice of this meeting to be 
posted in less than the 15-day requirement.

    Dated: January 3, 1995.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 95-313 Filed 1-5-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-4-M
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas July 21, 2021 No. 04-21-00275-CV Luis Ortiz LEANDRO , Appellant
v. Sylvia MEDINA , Appellee From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021CV01339 Honorable J Frank Davis, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice This is an appeal in an eviction action. Appellant has filed a motion for an emergency stay of the issuance of the writ of possession. In essence, appellant is asking that we stay the county court’s judgment pending our determination of the appeal. However, the county court did not set a supersedeas bond and appellant did not file a supersedeas bond as required by the Texas Property Code. See T EX . P ROP . C ODE A NN . § 24.007 (“A judgment of a county court may not under any circumstances be stayed pending appeal unless, within 10 days of the signing of the judgment, the appellant files a supersedeas bond in an amount set by the county court.”). Accordingly, we DENY appellant’s motion. See id. 1

_________________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

1 We do not address the merits of appellant’s appeal in this order.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 21st day of July, 2021.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Forms S-3 (No. 333-106608, No. 333-108924, No. 333-10754, No. 333-110752, No.
333-82496, No. 333-91225, No. 333-91235 and No. 333-17105) and Forms S-8 (No.
333-109595 and No. 333-82410) of SpatiaLight, Inc. of our report dated October
17, 2005 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of SpatiaLight, Inc. and
its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004, and our report
dated March 2, 2005, except as to the sixth paragraph, which is as of October
17, 2005, relating to SpatiaLight, Inc. management's assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2004, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of
SpatiaLight, Inc. as of December 31, 2004, which reports are included in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 6.


                                /s/ ODENBERG, ULLAKKO, MURANISHI & CO. LLP

San Francisco, California
December 27, 2005
#### ELTHA KESLER CAMPBELL v. JOSEPH W. CAMPBELL.

(Filed 30 October, 1946.)

Appeal and Error §§ 19, 31g—

The pleadings upon which the judgment was entered are a necessary-part of the record upon the wife’s appeal from the dismissal of her motion to have the husband attached for contempt for failure to pay the amounts alleged to be due under the judgment, and when they are not incorporated in the record, motion to dismiss the appeal will be allowed.

Appeal by petitioner from *Sink, J.,*at February Term, 1946, of Rowan.

*C. P. Barringer for petitioner.*

*Walter H. Woodson, Jr., for respondent.*

Seawell, J.

The respondent and petitioner are husband and wife, and have for some years lived separate and apart. The petitioner, in a motion *purpoi'ting*to be made in a pending action, sought to have the *654respondent subjected to a contempt order for refusing to pay amounts alleged to be due under a prior judgment, inferentially appearing to have been entered in a pending action. Upon tbe hearing Judge Sink dismissed the motion, assigning as his reason that the judgment exhibited (rendered by Rousseau, J., in .1943) was a consent judgment, with no provision for extending its terms or otherwise continuing the jurisdiction of the court; is a contract between the parties not enforceable by a contempt proceeding.

On this appeal the petitioner did not cause the pleadings in the action in which the consent judgment was entered to be brought up as a part of the record. They are a necessary part of the record, both as determining the character of the action and the jurisdiction and power of the court. G. S., 1-284. For this reason the appellee has moved to dismiss the appeal. The motion is allowed. *Allen v. Hammond,*122 N. C., 754, 30 S. E., 16; *Mitchell v. Moore,*62 N. C., 281; *Ericson v. Ericson, ante,*474, 475-6.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Beverly Black, Respondent, v Herbert L. Little, Appellant.

[772 NYS2d 868]

*521In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendant appeals, by permission, from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (DiBlasi, J.), dated August 13, 2003, which, in effect, granted the plaintiff’s motion to strike the answer on the ground that the defendant failed to comply with court-ordered disclosure.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

When a party’s failure to comply with court-ordered disclosure is shown to be willful, contumacious, or in bad faith, dismissal of that party’s pleading is within the broad discretion of the trial court *(see Vanalst v City of New York,*302 AD2d 515 [2003]; *Gruber v Central Truck Equip.,*298 AD2d 360 [2002]; *Frias v Fortini,*240 AD2d 467 [1997]; *cf. Hollymount Corp. v Park Corp.,*300 AD2d 444 [2002]). Furthermore, the absence of an excuse for the delay in responding to court-ordered disclosure supports an inference that the failure to comply was willful *(see Frias v Fortini, supra*at 468). Here, the defendant’s failure to comply with court-ordered disclosure, without sufficient excuse, was willful and contumacious. Accordingly, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in striking the answer. Ritter, J.P., S. Miller, Townes, Crane and Rivera, JJ., concur.
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 32 (Thursday, February 16, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9258]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3842]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Indian Gaming

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of approved amendment to Tribal-State Compact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 2710, of the Indian Gaming Regulatory 
Act of 1988 (Pub. L. 100-497), the Secretary of the Interior shall 
publish, in the Federal Register, notice of approved Tribal-State 
Compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III (casino) gaming on 
Indian reservations. The Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, 
Department of the Interior, through her delegated authority, has 
approved Amendment No. 1 to the Amended Gaming Compact Between the 
Sisseton-Wahpeton Tribe and the State of South Dakota, which was 
executed on November 19, 1994.

DATES: This action is effective February 16, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Scrivner, Acting Director, 
Indian Gaming Management Staff, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, 
D.C. 20240, (202) 219-4068.

    Dated: January 26, 1995.
Ada E. Deer,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 95-3842 Filed 2-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3734 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3734

 To amend title 5, United States Code, to designate Gold Star Families 
         Day as a legal public holiday, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 2, 2022

     Ms. Warren (for herself, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Kelly, and Ms. Rosen) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 5, United States Code, to designate Gold Star Families 
         Day as a legal public holiday, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Gold Star Families Day Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds the following:
            (1) The term ``Gold Star family''--
                    (A) refers to the immediate family of a 
                servicemember who dies--
                            (i) while serving in the Armed Forces; or
                            (ii) from a service-connected injury or 
                        illness; and
                    (B) originated from the service flags first flown 
                by families during World War I.
            (2) The flags described in paragraph (1)(B) included a blue 
        star for each immediate family member serving in the Armed 
        Forces during any period of war or hostilities in which the 
        Armed Forces were engaged. If a loved one represented by such a 
        blue star died, the blue star was replaced by a gold star, 
        which allowed members of the community to know the price that 
        the family had paid in the cause of defending freedom.
            (3) There are Gold Star families from World War I and many 
        thousands from World War II, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, 
        and Operations Desert Shield, Desert Storm, Iraqi Freedom, and 
        Enduring Freedom.
            (4) The United States recognizes the sacrifice that all 
        Gold Star family members make when a father, mother, brother, 
        sister, son, daughter, or other loved one dies in service to 
        the United States.

SEC. 3. GOLD STAR FAMILIES DAY AS A LEGAL PUBLIC HOLIDAY.

    Section 6103(a) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting after the item relating to Labor Day the following:
            ``Gold Star Families Day, the last Monday in September.''.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

Bank of America, N.A., as Trustee 

for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement No. 33-55784 on Form S-8 and RegistrationStatement No. 333-91460 on Form S-8 of XTO Energy Inc. of our report dated February 25, 2009, with respect to the statements of assets, liabilities, and trust corpus of the Cross Timbers Royalty Trust as of December 31, 2008 and2007, and the related statements of distributable income and changes in trust corpus for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as ofDecember 31, 2008, which report appears in the December 31, 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Cross Timbers Royalty Trust. 

 

KPMG LLP 

 

Fort Worth, Texas 

February 25, 2009
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-22-00443-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2022-003829-1

Before Kerr, Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

VERONICA LYNNE STEPHENS, Appellant

V.

THE APT AT FOUNTAINS CORNER, Appellee
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On February 7, 2023, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as 

the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could 

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant filed with 

the court an appellant’s brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the 

brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 

38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.

Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an 

opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of 

prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered: March 23, 2023
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LOURDES GARCIA-GARCIA, Petitioner,
v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. No. 07-70323 Agency No. A076-215-392
ORDER AMENDING MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges. The Memorandum Disposition in this appeal, filed on January 18, 2011, is corrected as follows: Page 2, second paragraph : Replace <2009> with <1999> in the sentence stating <The fact that she later con ceded at an August 16, 2009, hearing that she had twice been arrested for theft offenses does not demonstrate that she did not have the requisite intent to deceive because her later honesty occurred only after a certified record of her convictions had been entered in the record.>. We note that the error corrected is only typographical and reflects an error in transcription. It did not in any way impact our resolution of the case. 

# FILED
APR 12 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 The motion to recall the mandate is DENIED. No further motions or petitions may be filed.
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual Balance 

in 75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

-2.00% -4.34% 0.00% 0.00% -2.00% -4.34%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2009 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary, Social Security

August 26, 2009

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Trust Fund Investment in Equities

Proposed Provision: Invest 40 percent of the Trust Funds in equities (phased in 2010-2024), assuming an 

ultimate 2.9 percent real rate of return on equities, the same as the assumed ultimate yield on the specialissue Social Security trust fund bonds

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this provision

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Year

Percent

Cost rates with this provision

Cost rates under present law

Income rates with this provision

Income rates under present law

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

 (assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Year

Percent

Present law With this provision
Exhibit 10.80



|                       |  | Path 1 Network Technologies Inc. 6215 Ferris Square, Suite 140 San Diego, CA 92121
|---------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                       | 
|[GRAPHIC APPEARS HERE] |  | Phone 858.450.4220 Fax 858.450.4203 www.path1.com                                 



September 12, 2003



Mr. Ron Fellman

C/o Path 1 Network Technologies Inc.

6215 Ferris Square, Suite 140

San Diego, California 92121



Re: Letter Agreement For Stock Repurchase



Dear Ron,



This Letter Agreement memorializes
our agreement for Path 1 Network Technologies Inc. (the Company) to purchase from you $100,000 of the Companys common stock following the Companys successful public offering in which the Companys underwriter exercised
its option to purchase all additional units to cover over-allotments with respect this offering.



We agreed that the Company would repurchase 27,777 shares of its common shares at the public offering price of $3.60 per share, less the 7% underwriter commission, resulting in net proceeds of $93,000. Upon receipt of
the above-referenced 27,777 shares (that shall not have been pledged or otherwise encumbered), the Company will pay you the net proceeds of $93,000.



If you have any questions, please let me know.



Sincerely,



John R. Zavoli

CFO & General Counsel



|Agreed and Approved:    
|------------------------
|/s/    RON FELLMAN      
|Ron Fellman             
|Date: September 12, 2003
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3555 

To amend the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 to clarify the 

scope of the authority for emergency temporary standards, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2022 

Mr. SCOTT of Florida (for himself, Ms. ERNST, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. PAUL, Ms. 

LUMMIS, Mr. BARRASSO, and Mr. SULLIVAN) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 

to clarify the scope of the authority for emergency temporary standards, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘OSHA ETS Clarifica5 tion Act of 2022’’. 

6 SEC. 2. OSHA EMERGENCY TEMPORARY STANDARD. 

7 Section 6(c) of the Occupational Safety and Health 

8 Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 655(c)) is amended— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3555 IS

1 (1) by striking ‘‘and (B)’’ and inserting ‘‘(B) 

2 the exposure to the substances, agents, or new haz3 ards arises exclusively from within the workplace to 

4 be covered by the emergency temporary standard, or 

5 is unique and specific to the workplace to be covered 

6 by the emergency temporary standard, and (C)’’; 

7 and 

8 (2) by inserting ‘‘within the workplace’’ after 

9 ‘‘such danger’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 38 (Monday, February 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 10615]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4663]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Undergraduate Education; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Undergraduate Education.
    Date and Time: March 16, 1995 7:30 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.; March 17, 
1995; 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; March 18, 1995; 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Place: Doubletree National Airport Hotel, 300 Army/Navy Drive, 
Arlington, VA 22202.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Jim Lightbourne, Section Head, National 
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, 
Telephone: (703) 306-1667.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate unsolicited proposals submitted 
to the Course and Curriculum Development (CCD) Panel Meeting.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information, financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b.(c) (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: February 21, 1995.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-4663 Filed 2-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M