alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### MRS. GENEVA CONKLIN v. W. H. PENNY, Executor of the Estate of MRS. FLORENCE HALL, Deceased.

Appeal by defendant from *McKinnon, J.,*November Civil Term 1958 of DuRham.

Civil aiotion .to recover for services rendered by plaintiff to Mrs. Florence Hall from 1 May 1951 until 8 June 1955 — the date of Mrs. Hall’s death —, pursuant to an agreement by Mrs. Hall with plaintiff that she would compensate plaintiff for such services in her will.

There is ample evidence to show that plaintiff performed her part of the contract, rendered valuable services to Mrs. Hall during the last years of her life, and that the reasonable value of such services was from $9,000.00 to $10,000.00.

Upon the denial of liability by the executor and issues joined, the jury returned a verdict that plaintiff had rendered valuable services to Mrs. Hall from May 1951 until 8 June 1955 pursuant to the’alleged agreement, and that the reasonable value of such services was $7,500.00.

Defendant appeals.

*Claude V. Jones and Arthur Van for Plaintiff, appellee.*

*E. C. Brooks, Jr. and B. P. Reade for defendant, appellant.*

PeR CüRiam.

A study of the Record, the assignments of error, and the brief filed by' the defendant’s counsel fails to show any error sufficient to disturb the verdict and judgment below.

No Error.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 32 (Thursday, February 16, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9056]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3931]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Mathematical Sciences; Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Mathematical Sciences (1204).
    Date and Time: March 6-7, 1995; 8:30 a.m. til 5 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Rm 
1020, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Joe Jenkins, National Science Foundation, 
4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230 Telephone: (703) 306-
1870.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to National Science Foundation for 
financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate proposals concerning Lie Groups 
and their representation as part of the selection process for 
awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: February 13, 1995.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-3931 Filed 2-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
II 

Calendar No. 245 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3465 

To clarify the treatment of 2 or more employers as joint employers under 

the National Labor Relations Act and the Fair Labor Standards Act 

of 1938. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 10, 2022 

Mr. MARSHALL introduced the following bill; which was read the first time 

JANUARY 18, 2022 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

A BILL 

To clarify the treatment of 2 or more employers as joint 

employers under the National Labor Relations Act and 

the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Save Local Business 

5 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3465 PCS

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF JOINT EMPLOYMENT. 

2 (a) NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS ACT.—Section 

3 2(2) of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 

4 152(2)) is amended— 

5 (1) by striking ‘‘The term ‘employer’ ’’ and in6 serting ‘‘(A) The term ‘employer’ ’’; and 

7 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(B) An employer may be considered a joint employer 

9 of the employees of another employer only if each employer 

10 directly, actually, and immediately exercises significant 

11 control over the essential terms and conditions of employ12 ment of the employees of the other employer, such as hir13 ing such employees, discharging such employees, deter14 mining the rate of pay and benefits of such employees, 

15 supervising such employees on a day-to-day basis, assign16 ing such employees a work schedule, position, or task, or 

17 disciplining such employees.’’. 

18 (b) FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT OF 1938.—Section 

19 3(d) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 

20 203(d)) is amended— 

21 (1) by striking ‘‘ ‘Employer’ includes’’ and in22 serting ‘‘(1) ‘Employer’ includes’’; and 

23 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

24 ‘‘(2) An employer may be considered a joint employer 

25 of the employees of another employer for purposes of this 

26 Act only if each employer meets the criteria set forth in 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3465 PCS

1 section 2(2)(B) of the National Labor Relations Act (29 

2 U.S.C. 152(2)(B)) except that, for purposes of deter3 mining joint-employer status under this Act, the terms 

4 ‘employee’ and ‘employer’ referenced in such section shall 

5 have the meanings given such terms in this section.’’. 

6 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

7 This Act, and the amendments made by this Act, 

8 shall take effect on the date that is the first day of the 

9 first month that begins after the date of enactment of this 

10 Act. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 245 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3465 

A BILL 

To clarify the treatment of 2 or more employers as 

1938. tions Act and the Fair Labor Standards Act of joint employers under the National Labor RelaJANUARY 18, 2022 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                       LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

SUBSIDIARIES OF DECRANE AIRCRAFT HOLDINGS, INC.

AEROSPACE DISPLAY SYSTEMS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.

AUDIO INTERNATIONAL, INC., an Arkansas corporation.

AVTECH CORPORATION, a Washington corporation.

CARL F. BOOTH & CO., LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.

COLTECH, INC., a Texas corporation.

CUSTOM WOODWORK & PLASTICS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.

DAH-IP HOLDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation.

DAH-IP INFINITY, INC., a Delaware corporation.

DECRANE AIRCRAFT FURNITURE CO., LP, a Texas limited partnership.

DECRANE AIRCRAFT INTERNATIONAL SALES, INC., a Barbados corporation.

DETTMERS INDUSTRIES, INC., a Delaware corporation.

ERDA, INC., a Wisconsin corporation.

FLIGHT REFUELING, INC., a Maryland corporation.

HOLLINGSEAD INTERNATIONAL, INC., a California corporation.

HOLLINGSEAD INTERNATIONAL, LTD., a UK company.

INTERNATIONAL CUSTOM INTERIORS, INC., a Florida corporation.

PATRICK AIRCRAFT TANK SYSTEMS, INC., a Maryland corporation.

PATS AIRCRAFT AND ENGINEERING CORPORATION, a Maryland corporation.

PATS SUPPORT, INC., a Maryland corporation.

PATS, INC., a Maryland corporation.

PCI NEWCO, INC., a Delaware corporation.

PPI HOLDINGS, INC., a Kansas corporation.

PRECISION PATTERN, INC., a Kansas corporation.

THE INFINITY PARTNERS, LTD., a Texas limited partnership.

TRI-STAR ELECTRONICS EUROPE S.A., a Swiss company.

TRI-STAR ELECTRONICS INTERNATIONAL, INC., a California corporation.

TRI-STAR TECHNOLOGIES, a California general partnership.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 32 (Thursday, February 16, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9052]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3916]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Open Software Foundation, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on November 7, 1994, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Open Software Foundation, 
Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney 
General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its 
membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, the 
identities of the new, non-voting members of OSF are as follows: E.I. 
DuPont De Nemours & Co., Inc., Wilmington, DE; J.P. Morgan & Company, 
Inc., New York, NY; Knowledgeware, Inc., Atlanta, GA; Nihon Unisys, 
Inc., Tokyo, Japan; U.S. West Communications, Englewood, CO; Unibank A/
S-Unidata, Tastrup, Denmark; and University of Pennsylvania, 
Philadelphia, PA.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and OSF intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On May 11, 1994, OSF filed its original notification pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on August 
31, 1994 (59 FR 45009).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on July 20, 
1994. A Federal Register notice pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act has 
not yet been published.
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 95-3916 Filed 2-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-40793

Summary Calendar

 

JAMES PHILLIP HARRISON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JOHN E. SHERMAN, 

Attorney at Law,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:93-CV-211

- - - - - - - - - -

June 12, 1998

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

James Phillip Harrison, federal prisoner # 74580-012,

appeals the dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction of

his federal complaint on the ground that diversity of citizenship

was lacking under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1). Harrison has not

demonstrated plain error with respect to his argument that the

district court erred in dismissing his complaint for lack of

diversity of citizenship. See Highlands Ins. Co. v. National
No. 97-40793

-2-

Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, 27 F.3d 1027, 1031-32 (5th

Cir. 1994); Mas v. Perry, 489 F.2d 1396, 1399 (5th Cir. 1974);

see Stine v. Moore, 213 F.2d 446, 448 (5th Cir. 1954). Nor has

Harrison demonstrated plain error with respect to his argument

that he was entitled to notice prior to the magistrate judge's

dismissal of his compliant. See Stanley v. Central Intelligence

Agency, 639 F.2d 1146, 1159 (5th Cir. 1981).

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT
      32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350











We, each hereby certify to the best of
our knowledge that the Annual Report of Form 10-K of Gateway Tax Credit Fund
III, Ltd. for the year ended March 31, 2008 containing the financial statements
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)) and that information contained
in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Gateway.








/s/ Ronald M.
      Diner
              Ronald
      M. Diner
              President
              Raymond
      James Tax Credit Funds, Inc.
              (Managing
      General Partner)
              July
      11, 2008/s/ Jonathan
      Oorlog
              Jonathan
      Oorlog
              Vice
      President and Chief Financial Officer
              Raymond
      James Tax Credit Funds, Inc.
              (Managing
      General Partner)
              July
      11, 2008
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FAN JIN,

Petitioner,

v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 14

- 72785

Agency No. A088

- 111

- 374

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 14, 2016 **

Before: BEA, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Fan Jin, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s

decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief

under the Convention A gainst Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** We deny Jin’s request for oral argument and unanimously conclude

this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P.

34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUN 22 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 14

- 72785

8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency ’ s factual

findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility determinations

created by the REAL ID Act, Shrestha v. Holder , 590 F.3d 1034, 1039

- 40 (9th Cir.

2010). We deny the petition for review.

We do not consider the materials Jin references in his opening brief that are

not part of the administrative record. See Fisher v. INS , 79 F.3d 955, 963

- 64 (9th

C ir. 1996) (en banc).

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination

based on inconsistencies within Jin’s testimony and within the record evidence as

to his introduction to Christianity, and on inconsistencies between Jin’s testimony

and record evidence as to his places of residence. See Shrestha , 590 F.3d at 1048

(adverse credibility determination was reasonable under the “totality of

circumstances.”). Jin’s explanations for the inconsistencies do not compel a

contrary res ult. See Lata v. INS , 204 F.3d 1241, 1245 (9th Cir. 2000). In the

absence of credible testimony, Jin’s asylum and withholding of removal claims

fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft , 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).

Finally, Jin’s CAT claim also fails because it is based on the same testimony

the agency found not credible, and the record does not otherwise compel the3 14

- 72785

conclusion that it is more likely than not he would be tortured if returned to China.

See id. at 1156

- 57.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of SAVVIS Communications
Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



|(a) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                              
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------
|                       |  | 
|Date: October 30, 2003 |  |  |  | By: /s/ Jeffrey H. Von Deylen
|                       |  |  |  |
### Proposed Provision: B6.8. Starting in 2025, provide an additional monthly benefit equal to 1/12th of 2 percent of the AWI for the second prior year.  This additional benefit would be available to those meeting any of the following four requirements:  (a) Social Security beneficiaries who have attained age 82; (b) Social Security beneficiaries who have attained NRA and have both AIME at or below the first PIA bend point ($1,115 for 2023 initial eligibility) and at least 11 "years of coverage" as used for Windfall Elimination Provision purposes (earnings above $29,700 for 2023); (c) Individuals who have received Social Security benefits and/or SSI payments for at least 240 distinct months after attaining age 19; or (d) SSI recipients who have attained the Social Security NRA.  This additional benefit would be paid out of the applicable Social Security OASI or DI Trust Fund for any month in which the individual is in receipt of a Social Security benefit; it would be paid out of the General Fund of the Treasury for any month in which the individual is in receipt of an SSI monthly payment but not a Social Security monthly benefit.

back
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

August 21, 2012 

jam 

Order 

 

August 21, 2012 

145278 

DAVID L. WELLS, 

 Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 145278 

 CoA: 309061 

THUMB CORRECTIONAL FACILITY WARDEN, 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

___________________________________ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, plaintiff-appellant having failed to provide to 

the Court a certified copy of institutional account as required by MCL 600.2963 (1), the 

Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to close this file.
Exhibit 10.23

                     FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

     This First Amendment to Employment Agreement (this "Amendment") is made and
entered  into as of this 17th day of May,  2001,  by and between  DATA SYSTEMS &
SOFTWARE INC., a Delaware  corporation (the "Company"),  and GEORGE  MORGENSTERN
(the "Executive").

     WHEREAS,  the  Company  and the  Executive  are  parties  to an  Employment
Agreement  dated as of  January  1, 1997 (the  "Agreement"),  which  expires  on
December 31, 2001; and

     WHEREAS, the Company desires to assure itself of the Executive's  continued
services  until December 31, 2002 before he considers an election to be retained
by the Company on a part-time  basis in an advisory and  consultative  capacity,
and the Executive is willing to continue to provide such services to the Company
on a full time basis until such date.

     NOW,  THEREFORE,  in consideration  of the mutual promises  hereinafter set
forth,  the parties  hereto,  intending  to be legally  bound,  hereby  agree as
follows:

     1. Paragraphs 1(a),  1(b),  2(a)(2)(i) and 4(a) of the Agreement are hereby
amended  by  deleting  the  references   therein  to  "December  31,  2001"  and
substituting "December 31, 2002" in its place.

     2.  Paragraph  1(c)(ii) of the Agreement is hereby  amended by deleting the
reference therein to "December 31, 2005" and substituting "December 31, 2006" in
its place.

     3. Except as modified by this  Amendment,  all other terms of the Agreement
shall continue in full force and effect without modification.

     4. This  Amendment  may be  executed in  counterparts,  each of which shall
constitute  an original and which  together  shall  constitute  one and the same
agreement


                        [SIGNATURES APPEAR ON NEXT PAGE]

                                                                               1
<PAGE>



         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement, as
of the day and year first above written.


DATA SYSTEMS & SOFTWARE INC.


By:      /s/ YACOV KAUFMAN
     ---------------------------------------
      Yacov Kaufman, Vice President and
      Chief Financial Officer


By:      /s/ ROBERT L. KUHN
    ----------------------------------------
      Robert L. Kuhn, On Behalf
      of the Board of Directors


         /s/ GEORGE MORGENSTERN
---------------------------------------------
            GEORGE MORGENSTERN


                                                                               2
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 33 (Friday, February 19, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 8536]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02653]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management

[Docket No. BOEM-2015-0119]


Outer Continental Shelf (OCS), Gulf of Mexico (GOM), Oil and Gas 
Western Planning Area (WPA) Lease Sale 248, MMAA104000

AGENCY: Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability of a Final Supplemental Environmental 
Impact Statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: BOEM is announcing the availability of a Final Supplemental 
Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) for proposed GOM OCS Oil and Gas 
WPA Lease Sale 248. The Final SEIS provides a discussion of the 
potential significant impacts of the proposed action, provides an 
analysis of reasonable alternatives to the proposed action, and 
identifies the Bureau's preferred alternative.
    The Final SEIS is available on BOEM's Web site at http://www.boem.gov/nepaprocess/. BOEM will primarily distribute digital 
copies of the Final SEIS on compact discs. You may request a paper copy 
or the location of a library with a digital copy of the Final SEIS from 
the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Gulf of Mexico OCS Region, 
Public Information Office (GM 250C), 1201 Elmwood Park Boulevard, Room 
250, New Orleans, Louisiana 70123-2394 (1-800-200-GULF).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For more information on the WPA 248 
Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement, you may contact Mr. 
Gary D. Goeke, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Gulf of Mexico OCS 
Region, Office of Environment (GM 623E), 1201 Elmwood Park Boulevard, 
New Orleans, Louisiana 70123-2394 or by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5a2d2a3b686e621a38353f37743d352c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1463647526202c54767b71793a737b62">[email protected]</span></a>. You 
may also contact Mr. Goeke by telephone at 504-736-3233.

    Authority:  This Notice of Availability of a Final Supplemental 
Environmental Impact Statement is in compliance with the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et 
seq.), and is published pursuant to 43 CFR 46.415.

    Dated: January 4, 2016.
Abigail Ross Hopper,
Director, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management.
[FR Doc. 2016-02653 Filed 2-18-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4310-MR--P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>