alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip to main content

# Social Security

Search
Menu
Español
Sign in

## Old-Age & Survivors Insurance Trust Fund

Office of the Chief Actuary 

Beneficiary data

Trust fund data

Disability Insurance Trust Fund

     The *Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund* is a     separate account in the United States Treasury.   A fixed proportion      (dependent on the allocation of tax rates by      trust fund) of the payroll taxes     received under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act and      the Self-Employment Contributions Act are deposited in the fund      to the extent that such taxes are not needed immediately to pay     expenses.  Taxes are deposited in the fund     on every business day.

     The trust fund provides automatic spending authority to pay     monthly benefits to retired-worker (old-age) beneficiaries and their spouses      and children and to survivors of deceased insured workers.  With such     spending authority, the Social Security Administration does not need     to periodically request money from the Congress to pay benefits.

      Funds not withdrawn for current cost      (benefits, the financial interchange with the Railroad Retirement     program, and administrative expenses) are     invested in interest-bearing      Federal securities, as required by law; the interest earned      is also deposited in the trust fund.

     The Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) Trust Fund was created pursuant      to section 201 of the Social Security Act Amendments of 1939. These      amendments also established a Board of Trustees. OASI became effective on      January 1, 1940, and superseded the old-age reserve account      established under the Social Security Act of 1935.

     The Board of Trustees     currently consists of 6 members, 4 of whom automatically serve      by virtue of their positions in the Federal Government. These 4 are the     -  Secretary of the Treasury (the Managing Trustee),
-  Secretary of Labor,
-  Secretary of Health and Human Services, and
-  Commissioner of Social Security
     The other 2 members are appointed by the President, and confirmed by the Senate,      as required by the "Social Security Amendments of 1983."      These 2 members serve 4-year terms.

Footer menu
EXHIBIT 32.1

       CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NASB Financial, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2011, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, David H. Hancock, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.


August 9, 2011             By: /s/ David H. Hancock
                               David H. Hancock
                               Chairman and Chief
                                 Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to NASB Financial, Inc. and will be retained by NASB
Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.


This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for
any other purpose.

<Page>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 27 (Thursday, February 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7763]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3195]



[[Page 7763]]

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

[Docket No. CP94-353-001]


Questar Pipeline Co.; Notice of Amendment to Application

February 3, 1995.
    Take notice that on February 1, 1995, Questar Pipeline Company 
(Questar), 79 South State Street, Salt Lake City, Utah 84111, filed an 
amendment to its original application in Docket No. CP94-353-000 which 
was filed pursuant to Section 7(b) of the Natural Gas Act requesting 
authority to abandon by reclassification to a nonjurisdictional 
gathering designation its Jurisdictional Lateral (J.L.) No. 21 and 
Lateral No. 495.
    Questar states that it is amending its application pursuant to 
Section 7(b) of the Natural Gas Act by requesting authority to abandon, 
by sale, J.L. Nos. 21 and 495 to Luff Exploration Company (Luff). 
Questar states the sale to Luff will be made pursuant to the terms and 
conditions of a Facility Sales Agreement dated December 20, 1994. The 
net book value of the plant investment associated with the facilities 
proposed to be sold is approximately $18,550. Questar represents that 
Luff has stated it will enter into replacement-type gathering 
agreements with all existing customers to ensure the continuity of 
gathering services under reasonable terms, conditions and rates.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with 
reference to said amendment should on or before February 24, 1995, file 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20426, a 
motion to intervene or a protest in accordance with the requirements of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 
385.211) and the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). 
All protests filed with the Commission will be considered by it in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to 
make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party to a proceeding or to participate as a party in any 
hearing therein must file a motion to intervene in accordance with the 
Commission's Rules. All persons who have heretofore filed need not file 
again.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-3195 Filed 2-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 28 (Friday, February 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 8060]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3391]



[[Page 8060]]

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Sudbury, Assabet and Concord Rivers Study Committee; Notice of 
Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770, 5 U.S.C. App. 1 section 
10), that there will be a meeting of the Sudbury, Assabet and Concord 
Rivers Study Committee on Thursday, March 16, 1995.
    The Committee was established pursuant to Public Law 101-628. The 
purpose of the Committee is to consult with the Secretary of the 
Interior and to advise the Secretary in conducting the study of the 
Sudbury, Assabet and Concord River segments specified in Section 
5(a)(110) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. The Committee shall also 
advise the Secretary concerning management alternatives, should some or 
all of the river segments studied be found eligible for inclusion in 
the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System.
    The meeting will be held at 7:30 p.m., Thursday, March 16, 1995, 
Driving Directions: From south, take Rte. 27 to Water Row in Sudbury, 
turn right at end on to Lincoln Rd., left on Weir Hill Rd., follow 
signs to GMNWR Headquarters. From north, take Concord Rd. to Lincoln 
Rd., turn left, follow Lincoln Rd. to Weir Hill Rd., turn left, follow 
signs to headquarters building. Or, take Rte 126 north or south to 
Sherman's Bridge Rd. in Wayland, cross Sudbury River, turn right on 
Weir Hill Rd.

Agenda

I. Welcome and introductions, approval of minutes from 2/23/95 
meeting--Bill Sullivan, Chairman
II. Brief questions and comments from public
III. Management Plan: Vote to accept Final Draft
IV. Report on Town Meeting Warrant Articles and Agenda: Julia Blatt, 
Outreach Coordinator and town reps.
V. Issues of local concern
VI. Other Business--Next meeting date and location

    Interested persons may make oral/written presentations to the 
Committee during the business meeting or file written statements. 
Further information concerning the meeting may be obtained from Cassie 
Thomas, Planner, National Park Service, 15 State Street, Boston, MA 
02109 or call (617) 223-5014.

    Dated: February 3, 1995.
Chrysandra L. Walter,
Acting Deputy Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 95-3391 Filed 2-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
#### ROBERT JAMES KING, JR., By his Next Friend, ROBERT J. KING v. ELIZABETH S. STOUT and ROBERT JAMES KING v. ELIZABETH S. STOUT.

(Filed 28 September, 1960.)

Appeal by defendant from *Bundy, J.,*March Term, 1960, of Dtjplin.

Robert James King, Jr., a minor, sustained severe and permanent injuries resulting from a collision between an automobile and a tractor-trailer, when riding as a guest passenger in a family purpose automobile owned by defendant and driven by her minor son. The first action is by Robert James King, Jr., who sues by his father as next friend, to recover damages for personal injuries. The second action is brought by Robert James King, father of Robert James King, Jr., to recover damages for loss of his unemancipated son’s earnings during his minority and for expenses incurred for necessary medical treatment.

The two cases by consent of all the parties were tried together. The following issues, to which there is no exception, were submitted to the jury, and answered as appears:

“ISSUES AND VERDICT (First Case).

“1. Was the plaintiff, Robert James King, Jr., injured by the negligence of the defendant, as alleged in the Complaint?

ANSWER: Yes.

“2. What damages, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover on account of his injuries?

ANSWER: 18,900.00.

“ISSUES AND VERDICT (Second Case).

*74“1. Was the plaintiff, Robert J. King, damaged by the negligence of the defendant as alleged in the Complaint?

ANSWER: Yes.

“2. What damages, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover?

ANSWER: 3341.”

Separate judgments were entered in each case in accordance with the verdict. From these judgments defendant appeals.

*Rivers D. Johnson, Jr., and Vance B. Gavin for plaintiff, appellee.*

*John G. Dawson and Albert W. Cowper for defendant, appellant.*

PeR Cuhiam.

The jury, under the application of well settled principles of law, resolved the issues of fact against the defendant. While appellant has numerous assignments of error to the admission of evidence over her objections and exceptions, and six assignments of error to the charge, a careful examination of all her assignments of error discloses no new question or feature requiring extended discussion. Neither reversible nor prejudicial error has been made to appear. All of defendant’s assignments of error are overruled. The verdict and judgments will be upheld.

No error.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>            5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
condensed consolidated balance sheets and the condensed, consolidated
statements of operation of Forever Enterprises, Inc. filed as part
of Forever Enterprises, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2000, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such report.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      22,487,418
<SECURITIES>                               102,362,952
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,714,917
<ALLOWANCES>                                    90,000
<INVENTORY>                                    412,441
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           157,758,537
<PP&E>                                       8,054,752
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,849,939
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             216,942,284
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,730,474
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        69,334
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,287,469
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               216,942,284
<SALES>                                     41,784,691
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            51,415,765
<CGS>                                        1,815,230
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               55,407,323
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               956,258
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             316,673
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (3,351,973)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (935,832)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,416,141)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,416,141)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.35)


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-41436

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE ADAN OLVERA-ROJAS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:12-CR-1270-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Jose Adan Olvera-Rojas raises

an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Rodriguez, 711

F.3d 541, 562 n.28 (5th Cir. 2013) (en banc), petition for cert. filed (June 6, 2013)

(No. 12-10695), in which this court concluded that the generic, contemporary

definition of “sexual abuse of a minor” does not include the age-differential

requirement that Olvera-Rojas asserts is required. The appellant’s motion for

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 20, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-41436 Document: 00512346993 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2013
No. 12-41436

summarydispositionisGRANTED,andthejudgmentofthedistrict courtisAFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 12-41436 Document: 00512346993 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/20/2013
EXHIBIT 31.2

RULE 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Gary S. Titus, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the registrant); and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                                                                              
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 27, 2009 |  | /s/    GARY S.
TITUS                                                                         
|                     |  | Gary S. Titus Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3842 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3842

To amend title VI of the Social Security Act to permit State and local 
coronavirus fiscal recovery funds to be used to address increased costs 
                          of essential items.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 15, 2022

  Mr. Warnock introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title VI of the Social Security Act to permit State and local 
coronavirus fiscal recovery funds to be used to address increased costs 
                          of essential items.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Relief for Families Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO USE STATE AND LOCAL CORONAVIRUS FISCAL RECOVERY 
              FUNDS TO ADDRESS INCREASED COSTS OF ESSENTIAL ITEMS.

    (a) In General.--Sections 602(c)(1) and 603(c)(1) of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 802(c)(1), 803(c)(1)) are each amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``or'' after the 
        semicolon;
            (2) in subparagraph (D), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(E) to address increased costs of essential 
                items, including clothing or footwear that does not 
                exceed $100 per item of clothing or pair of footwear, 
                food (other than alcoholic beverages), diapers, 
                feminine hygiene products, prescription and over-the-
                counter medicine, items to prepare for natural 
                disasters or severe weather, school supplies, and 
                energy efficient appliances, by providing a temporary 
                suspension of sales taxes or similar temporary sales 
                tax relief for the purchase of such items that--
                            ``(i) is for a period of not less than 3 
                        days, and not more than 3 months;
                            ``(ii) begins after a minimum 2-week notice 
                        period; and
                            ``(iii) occurs during the 12-month period 
                        that begins on the day after the date of 
                        enactment of this subparagraph.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 602(c)(2)(A) of such Act (42 
U.S.C. 802(c)(2)(A)) is amended by striking ``A State or territory'' 
and inserting ``Except as permitted under paragraph (1)(E), a State or 
territory''.
                                 <all>
```
### Proposed Provision: B5.10. Reconfigure the special minimum benefit, phased in for retired and disabled workers newly eligible from 2030 through 2039: (a) A year of work (YOW) coverage is equal to earnings at or above $10,875 in 2023 (reflecting a full-time worker earning the federal minimum wage), adjusted thereafter for wage growth.  (b) At implementation, set the minimum PIA at zero percent of AWI for those with 10 or fewer YOWs to 15 percent of AWI for those with 15 YOWs, increasing linearly so that it reaches 19 percent for 19 YOWs.  Then the minimum PIA would jump up to 25 percent of AWI for those with 20 YOWs, increasing linearly so that it equals 35 percent of AWI for those with 35 or more YOWs. (c) Use the AWI for two years prior to the year of initial eligibility in the minimum PIA calculation with COLA increase after the year of initial eligibility. (d) Scale the YOW requirements for disabled workers, based on the number of years of non-disabled potential work.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 15-2551

___________________________

Mark Liner

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Arkansas - El Dorado

____________

 Submitted: February 10, 2016

 Filed: March 7, 2016

[Published]

____________

Before RILEY, Chief Judge, LOKEN and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Mark Liner applied for disability benefits, complaining of right-shoulder and

arm pain. The ALJ found he lacked credibility and denied his application. The
Appeals Council denied Liner’s request for review. The district court affirmed. 

1

Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms. 

Reviewed de novo, the agency’s decision is affirmed if supported by

substantial evidence. See Pelkey v. Barnhart, 433 F.3d 575, 577 (8th Cir. 2006). The

ALJ concluded Liner has the Residual Functional Capacity (RFC) to perform

sedentary work, which “involves lifting no more than 10 pounds at a time and

occasionally lifting or carrying articles like docket files, ledgers, and small tools.” 

20 C.F.R. § 404.1567(a). The ALJ further limited Liner to work involving no

overhead reaching with his right arm. Liner argues this did not account fully for his

right-shoulder impairment. 

The RFC is the most a claimant can do despite limitations. 20 C.F.R.

§ 404.1545(a). The ALJ considers all relevant evidence, but the final determination

must be supported by some medical evidence. See Wildman v. Astrue, 596 F.3d 959,

969 (8th Cir. 2010). Liner had right-shoulder surgery in 1990. In 2012, he saw Dr.

Jerry Grant for shoulder pain, who found Liner had no right grip strength and a 0-90

degree range of motion. An agency-ordered consultative examination showed

“[s]uspect mild degenerative changes” and limited range of motion in the right

shoulder, but no muscle atrophy or sensory abnormalities. The examination also

showed normal coordination, normal limb function, and normal grip strength. This

medical evidence supports the RFC.

* * * * * * * 

The judgment is affirmed.

______________________________

The Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the

1

Western District of Arkansas, sitting by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(c). 

-2-
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 2.54 2.60 70% 60%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

September 15, 2023

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable)

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: E2.1. Eliminate the taxable maximum in years 2024 and later, and apply full 12.4 

percent payroll tax rate to all earnings. Do not provide benefit credit for earnings above the current-law 

taxable maximum.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision