T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he H onor abl e H e nryE . H uds on, U ni t e d S t a t e s D i s tr i c tJudge f orthe ** E a s t e rn D i s tr i c tof

V i r gi ni a , s i tt i ng byde s i gna t i on. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T ME R C UR Y MAN Z AN O, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. T H E S T A T E O F C A L IF O RN IA DE P AR T ME NT OF MOT OR VEHI CL ES ; GEORGE VA LVER DE; C HA R L E S UN O; VA L E R I E L OG AN ; L UP A V E GA ; GA L DI NO I B AR R A, D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 10- 55117 D . C . N o . 2 : 0 8 - c v - 0 5 0 4 0 - O D WV BK ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia O t i s D . W r i ght , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r9, 2011

P a s a d e n a , C a lif

o rn ia B ef ore: S C H R O E D E R and R E IN H A R D T , C i rc ui tJudg es , and H U D S O N , D i stri ct Judg e. ** 

# FI LED JAN 31 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

M e r c uryM a nz a no appe a l s f r om the di s m i s s a l of

hi s 42 U . S . C . § 1983 a c t i on f orf a i l ur e t o pr os e c ut e . P l a i nt i f f r e pe a t e dl ym i s s e d de a dl i ne s t o f i l e as e c ond am ended com pl ai nt . T he di stri ctcourtdeni ed pl ai nt i ff’ s unt i m el y s t i pu l at i on for a f urthe re xt e ns i on of

t i m e . W he n pl a i nt i f

f f a i l e d t o f i l e a n oppos i t i on t o the m ot i on t o d i sm i ss , the di stri ctcourtdi sm i ss ed the ac t i on . T he di stri ctcourtthen d eni ed M a nz a no’ s appl i c a t i on t o s e ta s i de the di s m i s s a l , w hi c h ha d c ont e nde d tha tthe ne gl e c tof

hi s c ouns e l s houl d be e xc us e d due t o i l l ne s s . P ur s ua ntt o the t e rm s of F . R . A . P . 4( a ) ( 7) ( A ) ( i i ) , w e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on ove rthe appe a l be c aus e the t i m e f or fi l i ng the no t i ce of appeal w as ext ended t o 1 80 days fr om the entryof the di sm i ss al o r d e r . Stepha ni e- Cardo na L L Cv. Sm i th’s Foo d a ndD rug C enter s, Inc. , 476 F . 3d 7 0 1 , 7 0 3 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 7 ) . P l a i nt i f f’ s be l a t e d M ot i on t o be R e l i e ve d of D e f aul ti n T i m e l yS ubm i tt i ng E xc e rptof

R e c or d i n thi s c ourti s gr a nt e d. T he E xc e rpt s a r e or de r e d f i l e d. T h e d istrict co u rt d idn o t ab u se it s d iscr etio n in d en yin g M an za n o ’s un t i m el y s t i pu l at i on for afurther e xt ensi on of t i m e t o fi l e ase cond am ended c o m p la in t. Se e K

y le v . Cam

pbe l l Soup C o. , 2 8 F .3 d9 2 8 , 9 3 0 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 4 ) . M a nz a no s oughtne i the rat i m e l ye xt e ns i on unde rF . R . C . P . 6( b) ( 1) ( A ) be f or e the d e a d l i n e f

o rf i l i n g as e c o n da me n d e dc o mp l a i n t , n o ra n e x t e n s i o n u n d e rF. R. C. P. 6( b) ( 1) ( B ) f

ore xc us abl e ne gl e c ta f

t e rthe de a dl i ne ha d pa s s e d. M a nz a no w a s not3

e n title dto r e lyo n th e s tip u la tio n , a s it w a s n o t b in d in g o n th e c o u rt. See In re So n o ma V. , 7 0 3 F .2 d4 2 9 , 4 3 1 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 8 3 ) . I n s e e ki ng t o s e ta s i de the di s m i s s a l , M a nz a no s ty l e d hi s appl i c a t i on a s one pur s ua ntt o F . R . C . P . 60( b) ( 1) , c l a i m i ng e xc us abl e ne gl e c t . N e i the rhi s m ot i on nor h is b r ie f o n ap p e a l, h o w e v e r , c o n te n d e dth a t a n yo f th e f a c to r s to b e c o n s id e r e din s u c h a n ap p lic a tio n w e r e s a tis f ie d . See P i on ee r I

nv. Servs. C o. v. B runsw i ck A s s o c s . L td. P ’s h ip , 5 0 7 U .S . 3 8 0 , 3 9 5 ( 1 9 9 3 ) ; B r i ones v . R i v i e r a H ote l & Cas i no , 1 1 6 F .3 d3 7 9 , 3 8 1 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 7 ) . M o r e o v e r , th e n e g le c t th a t M a n z a n o s o u g h t to have the courtexcuse — hi s f ai l ure t o fi l e at i m el y s ec on d am ended c om pl a i nt

— w a s notthe ba s i s f orthe di s tr i c tc ourt ' s di s m i s s a l of the a c t i on. T he ac ti o n w as d ism isse db ec au se M an za n o fa il ed to file a r es p o n se to th e s tate’s m o ti o n to d ism iss. T h e d istrict co u rt w as th er ef o re co rr ec t t o d en y M an za n o ’s ap p lic a tio n , w h ic h d idn o t a d d r e s s th e a c tu a l b a s is o f th e ju d g m e n t. A FFI R M ED .