alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3760 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3760

  To continue the temporary waiver of interest on State unemployment 
 loans during the pandemic to provide additional relief, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 3, 2022

Mr. Durbin (for himself, Ms. Duckworth, Ms. Smith, Mrs. Gillibrand, Mr. 
 Bennet, and Mr. Blumenthal) introduced the following bill; which was 
          read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To continue the temporary waiver of interest on State unemployment 
 loans during the pandemic to provide additional relief, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Continued Waiver of Interest on 
State Unemployment Loans during the Pandemic Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF INTEREST-FREE LOANS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1202(b)(10)(A) of the Social Security Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1322(b)(10)(A)) is amended by striking ``September 6, 2021'' 
and inserting ``September 30, 2022''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as if included in the enactment of the Families First 
Coronavirus Response Act (Public Law 116-127).
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 10.5
 PUT AGREEMENT
 
 RE:
    
    100,000 Shares of the $.001 Par Value Common Stock of Remote Knowledge, Inc.
Issued in Name of Holder




---



##### 



28th
 ALAN GRANADER/s/ Alan Granader
 STATE OF Michigan
    
    }} ss.COUNTY OF Oakland
    
    }
 th
 /s/ Marilyn J. HoldenNotary PublicMy Commission Expires: 1/29/08 DAN GRANADER/s/ Dan Granader
 STATE OF Montana
    
    }} ss.COUNTY OF Missoula
    
    }
  /s/ Percy L. ClineNotary PublicMy Commission Expires: January 30, 2008 HARRY GRANADER/s/ Harry Granader
 STATE OF Michigan
    
    }} ss.COUNTY OF Oakland
    
    }
 28th
 /s/ Marilyn J. HoldenNotary PublicMy Commission Expires: 1/29/08
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 -0.23 -0.31 -6% -7%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

September 15, 2023

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Level of Monthly Benefits

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: B6.6. Starting in 2030, provide a uniform PIA increase in the 24th year of benefit 

eligibility. Phase in the PIA increase at 0.5 percent per year from the 15th through the 24th years of 

eligibility. The full PIA increase is equal to 5 percent of the average retired worker PIA in December of the 

14th year of benefit eligibility. A similar additional PIA increase applies in the 43rd year of benefit eligibility 

(age 104), phased in from the 34th through the 43rd years of eligibility. For those past the 15th year of 

eligibility in 2029 (over age 76 for retirees), phase in the PIA enhancement over 10 years starting in 2030. 

Auxiliary beneficiaries receive benefit enhancement based on the PIA of the governing worker.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 37 (Friday, February 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 10408]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4566]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--The Frame Relay Forum

    Notice is hereby given that, on December 20, 1994, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), The Frame Relay Forum 
(``FRF'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in 
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, the identities of the additional members of FRF are: Cray 
Communications, Watford Hertforshire, UNITED KINGDOM; Cabletron 
Systems, Inc., Rochester, NH; BT, Reston, VA; General Instrument, 
Hatboro, PA; Telefonica de Espana, Madrid, SPAIN; Tellabs Ltd., Shannon 
County Clare, IRELAND; and Unisource Business Network, Stockholm, 
SWEDEN.
    Wellfleet Communications, a member of FRF, has changed its name to 
Bay Networks.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activities of FRF. Membership remains open, and FRF intends to file 
additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On April 10, 1992, FRF filed its original notification pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on July 2, 
1992 (57 FR 29537).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on September 
21, 1994. This notice has not yet been published in the Federal 
Register.
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 95-4566 Filed 2-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 37 (Friday, February 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10406-10407]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4581]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION
[Finance Docket No. 32561]


Escanaba & Lake Superior Railroad Co.--Acquisition and Operation 
Exemption--Line of Chicago and Northwestern Railway Co.

AGENCY: Interstate Commerce Commission.

ACTION: Notice of exemption.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission exempts from the prior approval requirements of 
49 U.S.C. 11343-11345 the acquisition and operation by the Escanaba & 
Lake Superior Railroad Company of the 5.45-mile line of the Chicago and 
Northwestern Railway Company between milepost 46.1, near Stiles 
[[Page 10407]] Junction, and milepost 40.65, near Oconto Falls, in 
Wisconsin, subject to the labor protective conditions set forth in New 
York Dock Ry.--Control--Brooklyn Eastern Dist., 360 I.C.C. 60 (1979), 
as clarified in Wilmington Term. RR. Inc.--Pur. & Lease--CSX Transp., 
Inc., 6 I.C.C.2d 799 (1990), aff'd sub nom. Railway Labor Executives' 
Ass'n v. ICC, 930 F.2d 511 (6th Cir. 1991).

DATES: This exemption will be effective on March 26, 1995. Petitions 
for stay must be filed by March 13, 1995 and petitions to reopen must 
be filed by March 21, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Send pleadings referring to Finance Docket No. 32561 to: (1) 
Office of the Secretary, Case Control Branch, Interstate Commerce 
Commission 1201 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20423; and (2) 
Larry H. Mitchell, 4th Floor, 1920 L Street NW., Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beryl Gordon, (202) 927-5610. (TDD for 
the hearing impaired: (202) 927-5721).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Commission's decision. To purchase a copy of the full decision, write 
to, call, or pick up in person from: Dynamic Concepts, Inc., Room 2229, 
Interstate Commerce Commission Building, Washington, DC 20423. 
Telephone: (202) 289-4357/4359. (Assistance for the hearing impaired is 
available through TDD services (202) 927-5721).

    Decided: February 7, 1995.

    By the Commission, Chairman McDonald, Vice Chairman Morgan, and 
Commissioners Simmons and Owen.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-4581 Filed 2-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7035-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,699
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  109,659
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,897
<INVENTORY>                                      3,612
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               119,610
<PP&E>                                         305,168
<DEPRECIATION>                                 134,041
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 716,824
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,431
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           584
<OTHER-SE>                                     486,111
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   716,824
<SALES>                                        581,786
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               581,786
<CGS>                                           89,592
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   89,592
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               323,698
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,981
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,940
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                162,747
<INCOME-TAX>                                    62,007
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            100,740
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   100,740
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.74


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2
                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO\
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report of Motor Cars Auto Group
Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Barry Tenzer, Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: May 3, 2004

/s/ Barry Tenzer
---------------------------
Barry Tenzer
Principal Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7673

CHRISTOPHER A. IRELAND, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JAMES DARREN BYERS,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief

District Judge. (CA-97-952-1)

Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 18, 1999

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher A. Ireland, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. James Darren Byers,

LAW OFFICE OF J. DARREN BYERS, P.A., Winston-Salem, North Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Ireland appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint.

Appellee J. Darren Byers has moved to dismiss Ireland’s appeal. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting

the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order on the reasoning

of the district court. Ireland v. Byers, No. CA-97-952-1 (M.D.N.C.

Oct. 26, 1998). We conclude that the district court did not err in

dismissing the case with prejudice. We deny Appellee’s motion to

dismiss as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### In re Will of SUDIE HARGROVE.

(Filed 31 October, 1934.)

1. Appeal and Error A f — Propounders are not “parties aggrieved” by-order setting aside verdict in favor of caveators.

In tbis caveat proceeding tbe jury found against propounders, and tbe trial court set aside tbe verdict as being against tbe weight of tbe evidence and ordered a new trial. Propounders appealed, assigning as error tbe refusal of tbe court to sustain their pleas in bar: *Held,*tbe pro-pounders are not tbe “parties aggrieved” by tbe order setting aside the verdict, O. S., 632, and cannot maintain tbe appeal.

• 2. Appeal and Error *3*a—

Tbe Supreme Court will not interfere with tbe discretion of tbe trial judge in setting aside a verdict as being against tbe weight of tbe evidence.

Appeal by propounders from *Frizzelle, J.,*at May Term, 1934, of SAMPSON.

Issue of *devisavit vel non,*raised by a caveat to tbe will of Sudie Hargrove, late of Sampson County, based upon alleged mental incapacity.

Tbe jury found tbat tbe alleged testatrix did not bave sufficient mental capacity to execute tbe paper-writing propounded, and tbat tbe same was not tbe last will and testament of Sudie Hargrove.

Tbe court being of opinion tbat tbe verdict- was contrary to tbe weight of tbe evidence, on tbe determinative issues, set tbe same aside, in bis discretion, and ordered tbe issue of *devisavit*reinstated on tbe calendar for trial at a later term.

Propounders appeal, assigning as error tbe refusal of tbe court to sustain tbeir pleas in bar.

*J. Faison Thomson, Needham Outlaw, Hewry E. Faison, Henry A. Grady, Jr., and Hugh Brown Campbell for the caveators.*

*Butler & Butler for propounders.*

Stacy, C. J.

Tbis is tbe same case tbat was before us on two former appeals, reported in 206 N. C., 307, 173 S. E., 577, and 205 N. C., 72, 169 S. E., 812.

Tbe questions now sought to be presented are not properly before us for decision. In tbe first place, tbe propounders are not tbe “parties aggrieved” by tbe order setting aside tbe verdict within tbe meaning of C. S., 632 — such action being favorable to them — and, in tbe next place, “tbis Court will not interfere with tbe discretion of tbe trial judge in *281setting aside a verdict as being against the weight of the evidence.” *Edwards v. Phifer,*120 N. C., 405, 27 S. E., 79; *Brink v. Black,*74 N. C., 329; *Goodman v. Goodman,*201 N. C., 808, 161 S. E., 686.

The appeal was improvidently taken, and must be dismissed. *McCullock v. R. R.,*146 N. C., 316, 59 S. E., 882; *Guy v. Ins. Co.,*206 N. C., 118, 172 S. E., 885.

Appeal dismissed.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 7111

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. TIMOTHY NICHOLAS RHODES , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Wilmington

. Malcolm J. Howard , Senior District Judge. ( 7:04

- cr - 00082

- H

- 4 )

Submitted : June 30, 2021 Decided: July 21, 2021

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Timothy Nicholas Rhodes, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Timothy Nicholas Rhodes appeals the district court’s order gra nting in part his
motion for a sentence reduction under Section 404 of the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L.
No. 115

- 391, 132 Stat. 5194. We review a district court’s decision whether to grant a sentence reduction under the First Step Act for an abuse of di scretion. See United States v. Jackson , 952 F.3d 492, 297 (4th Cir. 2020) (reviewing ruling on First Step Act motion for abuse of discretion but declining to define parameters of such review). We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. We therefore affirm the district court’s order and deny Rhodes’ motions to appoint counsel and to file a supplement to his informal brief on appeal. See 4th Cir. R. 27(c). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequatel y presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statements on Forms S-3 (No.  333-106608,  No.  333-108924,  No. 333-10754,  No.
333-110752,  No. 333-82496,  No. 333-91225, No. 333-91235 and No. 333-17105) and
Form S-8 (No.  333-109595,  No.  33-82410)  of our report  dated  March 5, 2004
relating to the consolidated  financial  statements of SpatiaLight,  Inc., which
appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
--------------------------
BDO Seidman, LLP

San Francisco, California
March 25, 2004
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-16-00208-CR

EX PARTE Jose Manuel ROMO-MORAN

From the 2nd 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15-2181-CV

Honorable W.C. Kirkendall, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE BARNARD, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order is REVERSED, 

habeas relief is GRANTED, and the matter is REMANDED to the trial court to permit Jose Manuel 

Romo-Moran to withdraw his plea. 

SIGNED February 15, 2017.

_____________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CNB Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, H. N. Padget, Jr.,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, William R. Blanton, Chief
Operating and Financial officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toss. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

                                     /s/  H. N. Padget, Jr.
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     H. N. Padget, Jr., President and CEO
                                     (principal executive officer)

                                     /s/ William R. Blanton
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     William R. Blanton, Vice Chairman, COO/CFO
                                     (principal financial officer)

August 11, 2004
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Leland F. Wilson, Chief Executive Officer of VIVUS, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of VIVUS, Inc. on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of VIVUS, Inc. This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an
exhibit to such Annual Report on Form 10-K. A signed original of this statement has been provided to VIVUS, Inc. and will be retained by VIVUS, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: February 28, 2011

By:

/s/ LELAND F. WILSON Leland F. Wilson Chief Executive Officer


I,
Timothy E. Morris, Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of VIVUS, Inc. on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of VIVUS, Inc. This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such Annual Report on
Form 10-K. A signed original of this statement has been provided to VIVUS, Inc. and will be retained by VIVUS, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: February 28, 2011

By:

/s/ TIMOTHY E. MORRIS Timothy E. Morris Senior Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 23.2



[LETTERHEAD OF MILLER AND LENTS, LTD. APPEARS HERE]



March 16, 2006



Cross Timbers Royalty Trust

P.O. Box 830650

Dallas, TX 75283-0650



| | Re: | Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
| | --- | ---------------------------

2005 Annual
Report on Form 10-K



Gentlemen:



The firm of Miller and Lents, Ltd., consents to the use of its name and to
the use of its report dated February 20, 2006, regarding the Cross Timbers Royalty Trust Proved Reserves and Future Net Revenues as of December 31, 2005, in the 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.



Miller and Lents, Ltd., has no interests in Cross Timbers Royalty Trust or in
any affiliated companies or subsidiaries and is not to receive any such interest as payment for such reports and has no director, officer, or employee otherwise connected with Cross Timbers Royalty Trust. We are not employed by Cross Timbers Royalty
Trust on a contingent basis.



Yours very truly,MILLER AND LENTS, LTD.By

/S/ JAMES PEARSONJames Pearson Chairman