alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Washington Banking Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michal D. Cann, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.

This certification is being furnished solely to comply with the requirements of
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any of
the Company's filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise be deemed to be filed as part of the Report
or under such Acts.

/s/ Michal D. Cann
-------------------------------
Michal D. Cann
Chief Executive Officer

November 12, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3756 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3756

To require a strategy for international cooperation to counter Russian 
                       energy influence globally.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 3, 2022

 Mr. Cornyn (for himself and Mr. King) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require a strategy for international cooperation to counter Russian 
                       energy influence globally.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Strategy to Reduce Russian Energy 
Influence Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. STRATEGY TO COUNTER RUSSIAN ENERGY INFLUENCE GLOBALLY.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State, in consultation with the 
Secretary of Energy and the heads of other relevant Federal departments 
and agencies, shall submit to Congress a report evaluating how Federal 
laws and authorities available as of the date of the enactment of this 
Act can be used to counter Russian energy influence globally.
    (b) Strategy.--The report required under subsection (a) shall 
include a strategy to reduce or replace the Russian Federation's supply 
of energy products in global markets, including a plan for cooperation 
and coordination with United States allies and partners to counter 
Russian energy influence.
                                 <all>
```
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Payroll Tax Rates | Description of Proposed Provision:      Raise payroll tax rates (for employees and employers combined) by 1.6 percentage points in 2021 (to 14.0% combined) and by an additional 1.6 percentage points in 2051 (to 15.6% combined) |
|-------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                   |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2008 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified July 16, 2008 |
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three and six months ended March 31,
2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a)-14(b) or 15(d)-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the
periods indicated.
  By:
    /s/ PERVEZ QURESHIPervez QureshiPresident and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 9, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 6912]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02600]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, 
February 11, 2016 at 2:00 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has 
certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the 
scheduled matter at the Closed Meeting.
    Chair White, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed 
for the Closed Meeting in closed session.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings; and
Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact the Office of the 
Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: February 4, 2016.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-02600 Filed 2-5-16; 11:15 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 33 (Friday, February 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9321-9322]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4041]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Limited Global Cotton Import Quota Announcement

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A limited global import quota for upland cotton equal to 
193,632,858 kilograms (426,887,727 pounds) is established in accordance 
with section 103B(n) of the Agricultural Act of 1949, as amended (1949 
Act). This quota is covered under Presidential Proclamation 6301 of 
June 7, 1991, and is referenced as the Secretary of Agriculture's 
Limited Global Cotton Import Quota Announcement, chapter 99, subchapter 
III, subheading 9903.52.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS).

DATES: The quota is established for the 90-day period beginning on 
January 6 and ending on April 6, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janise Zygmont, Consolidated Farm 
Service Agency, United States Department of Agriculture, Room 3756- 
[[Page 9322]] S, PO Box 2415, Washington, DC 20013-2415 or call 202-
720-8841.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 1949 Act requires that a limited global 
import quota for upland cotton be determined and announced immediately 
whenever the average price of the base quality of upland cotton in the 
designated spot markets for a month exceeds 130 percent of the average 
price of such quality of cotton in such markets for the preceding 36 
months. The limited global import quota means a quantity of imports 
that is not subject to the over-quota tariff rate of a tariff-rate 
quota. The December 1994 spot market average for base quality cotton 
was 81.92 cents per pound, which is 136 percent of the 60.06 cents-per-
pound average of the previous 36-month period from December 1991 
through November 1994.
    The 1949 Act requires that if a quota has been established under 
the authority of section 103(B)(n) during the preceding 12 months, the 
quantity of the quota shall be the smaller of 21 days of domestic mill 
consumption at the seasonally-adjusted average rate of the most recent 
3 months for which data are available (21-day supply) or the quantity 
required to increase supply to 130 percent of demand. Since the 21-day 
supply is smaller than the amount needed to increase supply to 130 
percent of demand, the quota is equal to 21 days of domestic mill 
consumption of upland cotton at the seasonally-adjusted average rate 
for the period September through November 1994. The quota is not 
divided by staple length or by country of origin. The quota does not 
affect existing tariff rates or phytosanitary regulations.

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1444-2 (n) and U.S. Note 6(b), Subchapter 
III, Chapter 99 of the HTS.

    Signed at Washington, DC, on February 10, 1995.
Richard E. Rominger,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-4041 Filed 2-16-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-05-P
EXHIBIT 32.1



LOGO



May 13, 2004



Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, NW

Washington, D.C. 20549



Re:        Conrad Industries, Inc.

Certification of Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, pursuant to Section 906 of

the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Ladies and Gentlemen:



Conrad Industries, Inc. filed today, via EDGAR, its quarterly report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004. The undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify that the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



This certification is being furnished solely to comply with the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and is being filed as an
exhibit to the Form 10-Q.





Very truly yours,/S/ JOHN P. CONRAD, JR.John P. Conrad, Jr.President,Chief Executive Officer And Co-Chairman of the Board/S/ LEWIS J. DERBES, JR.Lewis J. Derbes, Jr.Vice President andChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.20
 Executive Incentive Plan
    
    
    the Companys net income (loss) before amortization of
acquisition-related intangibles, restructuring and
impairments, stock-based compensation expense, other
unusual charges and any tax effects related to these
items for fiscal 2010 as compared to the target
established by the Committee  40%
    
    the executives achievement of individual, measurable
objectives during fiscal 2010 as determined by the
Committee for all executives with the exception of the
Chief Executive Officer, who is evaluated by the Board of
Directors  40%
    
    the executives overall contribution during fiscal 2010
towards the achievement of the Companys financial and
non-financial objectives (subjective performance measure)
  20%
   Target Incentive as % ofExecutive Officer
    
    Title
    
    Base Salary
    
    Target IncentiveGregory J. Yurek
    
    Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
    
    
    75
    %
    
    $
    450,000Daniel P. McGahn
    
    President and Chief
Operating Officer
    
    
    65
    %
    
    $
    214,500Charles W. Stankiewicz
    
    Executive Vice
President and General Manager, AMSC
Power Systems
    
    
    50
    %
    
    $
    160,500David A. Henry
    
    Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
    
    
    50
    %
    
    $
    147,500John R. Collett
    
    Senior Vice
President and Chief Strategy Officer
    
    
    50
    %
    
    $
    125,000Angelo R. Santamaria
    
    Senior Vice President, Global Manufacturing Operations
    
    
    50
    %
    
    $
    120,000Timothy D. Poor
    
    Senior Vice
President, Global Sales and
Business Development
    
    
    50
    %
    
    $
    120,000Susan J. DiCecco
    
    Vice President, Corporate Administration
    
    
    50
    %
    
    $
    112,500
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1
 
           CONSENT OF PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP, INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectuses
constituting part of the Registration Statements on Forms S-3 (Nos. 33-28225,
33-17119, 33-7369) and the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos. 33-
20089, 33-48273, 33-99372, 33-20861) of SyQuest Technology, Inc. of our report
dated December 29, 1997 appearing on page 30 of this Form 10-K.
 
                                                      /s/ Price Waterhouse LLP
San Jose, California
December 29, 1997
1

The HONORABLE GEORGE HOWARD, JR., United States District Judge

for the Eastern District of Arkansas. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-1362

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Eastern District of Arkansas.

*

Sherri M. Sotherland, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: June 3, 2003

 Filed: June 9, 2003

___________

Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, MURPHY, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Sherri M. Sotherland pleaded guilty to one count of knowingly and willfully

executing a scheme to defraud a financial institution, in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§ 1344. The district court1

 sentenced her to 10 months imprisonment and 5 years

supervised release, and to pay restitution of $21,467.94. On appeal, counsel has

moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

raising the following issues: whether she was afforded her right of allocution,
-2-

whether the restitution order was proper, and whether the district court should have

departed downward. 

These issues lack merit. The sentencing transcript shows that Sotherland was

afforded her right of allocution, see United States v. Kaniss, 150 F.3d 967, 969 (8th

Cir. 1998); the district court properly established a payment schedule for the ordered

restitution, cf. United States v. McGlothlin, 249 F.3d 783, 784-85 (8th Cir. 2001)

(remanding restitution order where sentencing court failed to establish schedule of

restitution payments); and we do not review the district court’s decision not to depart

because there is no indication that it was unaware of its authority to do so, see United

States v. Koons, 300 F.3d 985, 993-94 (8th Cir. 2002).

We have reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75 (1988), and we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s

motion to withdraw, and we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3733 

To prohibit investment by institutional investors in securities issued by 

Russian entities. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 2, 2022 

Mr. RUBIO introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit investment by institutional investors in securities 

issued by Russian entities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Instituting Measures 

5 to Protect American Investors and Retirees from Russia 

6 Act of 2022’’ or the ‘‘IMPAIR Russia Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3733 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON INVESTMENT IN SECURITIES OF 

2 RUSSIAN ENTITIES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—An institutional investor may not 

4 purchase a security issued by a Russian entity on or after 

5 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

6 (b) IMPLEMENTATION; PENALTIES.— 

7 (1) IMPLEMENTATION.—The President may ex8 ercise all authorities provided under sections 203 

9 and 205 of the International Emergency Economic 

10 Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1702 and 1704) to carry out 

11 subsection (a). 

12 (2) PENALTIES.—A person that violates, at13 tempts to violate, conspires to violate, or causes a 

14 violation of subsection (a) or any regulation, license, 

15 or order issued to carry out that subsection shall be 

16 subject to the penalties set forth in subsections (b) 

17 and (c) of section 206 of the International Emer18 gency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1705) to the 

19 same extent as a person that commits an unlawful 

20 act described in subsection (a) of that section. 

21 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

22 (1) INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR.—The term ‘‘in23 stitutional investor’’ means— 

24 (A) an investment company, as defined in 

25 section 3 of the Investment Company Act of 

26 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–3), or any person that 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3733 IS

1 would be an investment company but for the 

2 application of paragraph (1) or (7) of sub3 section (c) of that section; 

4 (B) an insurance company, as defined in 

5 section 2(a) of the Investment Company Act of 

6 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–2(a)); or 

7 (C) a fiduciary, within the meaning of sec8 tion 3(21) of the Employee Retirement Income 

9 Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1002(21)). 

10 (2) RUSSIAN ENTITY.—The term ‘‘Russian en11 tity’’ means an entity organized under the laws of 

12 the Russian Federation or otherwise subject to the 

13 jurisdiction of the Government of the Russian Fed14 eration. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 31.2**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 

I, Jerry C. Young, as Chief Financial Officer of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc.,certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: March 25, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 234 (Wednesday, December 6, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 62543]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-29857]








FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

time and date: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, December 7, 1995.

place: Room 600, 6th Floor, 1730 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.

status: Open.

matters to be considered: The Commission will consider and act upon the 
following:


    1. Thunder Basin Coal Co., Docket Nos. WEST 94-148-R, WEST 94-
303. (Issues include whether the judge erred in concluding that 
section 109(a) of the Mine Act does not require mine bulletin board 
posting of an Order of Temporary Reinstatement.)
    Any person attending this meeting who requires special 
accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 
interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. 
Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(e).


contact person for more infor: Jean Ellen (202) 653-5629 / for toll 
free TDD Relay 1-800-877-8339.


    Dated: November 30, 1995.
Jean H. Ellen,

Chief Docket Clerk.

[FR Doc. 95-29857 Filed 12-4-95; 1:45 pm]

BILLING CODE 6735-01-M
#### The Corn Exchange Bank, Respondent v. Alphonzo W. Blye, as Receiver, etc., Appellant.

Judgment affirmed.

Opinion by

Brady, J.