alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

# **CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

#  

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements on Form S-8 of HF Financial Corp., pertaining to the HF FinancialCorp. 2002 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, the 1991 Stock Option and IncentivePlan, the 1996 Director Restricted Stock Plan, and the Retirement Savings Planof our report dated September 24, 2007, accompanying the consolidated financialstatements included in the Form 10-K Annual Report of HF Financial Corp. forthe fiscal year ended June 30, 2007.

 

 
| /s/ Eide Bailly, LLP      |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
|                      |
| Sioux Falls, South Dakota |
| September 24, 2007        |

 

1

----
#### *L. P.*ELLIS MOTOR COMPANY v. R. E. BELCHER et al.

(Filed 14 June, 1933.)

Trial P a—

The refusal to submit issues tendered is not error when the issues tendered are not raised by the pleadings, C. S., 582.

Appeal by defendant from *Moore, Special Judge,*at September Term, 1932, of Pitt.

No error.

This is an action to recover from the defendant an automobile in his possession, which the plaintiff had sold to Dick Forman, retaining title until the purchase price was paid by an agreement in writing which was duly recorded. The defendant denied the allegations of the complaint. The issues submitted to the jury were answered favorably to the plaintiff.

*770From judgment tbat plaintiff recover of tbe defendant tbe automobile described in tbe complaint, tbe defendant appealed to tbe Supreme Court.

*Arthur B. Corey for plaintiff.*

*Charles H. Whedbee for defendant.*

Per Cueiam.

Tbe issue tendered by tbe defendant at tbe close of tbe evidence was not raised by tbe pleadings. There was, therefore, no error in tbe refusal of tbe court to submit this issue to tbe jury. C. S., 582.

There was no evidence at tbe trial tending to show tbat defendant bad a lien on tbe automobile in bis possession under C. S., 2435. For this reason, *Johnson v. Yates,*183 N. C., 24, 110 S. E., 630, is not applicable to tbe instant case.

There was no error in tbe trial of this action. Tbe judgment is affirmed.

No error.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7697

JULIO HENRI BONDI, a/k/a Danny Campen, Petitioner - Appellant,
versus STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; CHARLES M. CONDON, Attorney General of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofSouth Carolina, at Anderson. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (CA01-2340) Submitted: March 24, 2005 Decided: March 29, 2005 Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Julio Henri Bondi, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, William Edgar Salter, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Julio Henri Bondi, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bondi has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

I N THE MATTER OF V. F., A

JUVENILE

,

Appellant

. **§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§** No. 08

- 21

- 00 1 9 2

- C V

Appeal from the

65 th D istrict Court

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 1900883 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appell ee ’s third m otion for extension of time within which to file

the brief until June 20 , 2022

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO F ILE

THE APPELL EE ’S BR IEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Jo Anne Bernal , the Appell ee ’s attorney, prepare the

Appell ee ’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before June 20 , 2022

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 11 th d ay of May

, 20 2 2

.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox and Alley , JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9700]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4163]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Senior Executive Service; Appointment of a Member to the 
Performance Review Board

    Title 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4) provides that Notice of the appointment 
of an individual to serve as a member of the Performance Review Board 
of the Senior Executive Service shall be published in the Federal 
Register.
    The following individual is hereby appointed to a three-year term 
on the Department's Performance Review Board: Carl Lowe.
    For Further Information Contact: Mr. Larry K. Goodwin, Director of 
Human Resources, Room C5526, U.S. Department of Labor, Frances Perkins 
Building, 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C., 20210, 
telephone: (202) 219-6551.

    Signed at Washington, D.C., this 14 day of February, 1995.
Robert B. Reich,
Secretary of Labor.
[FR Doc. 95-4163 Filed 2-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-23-M
#### STATE v. HORACE BRIGHT.

(Filed 1 March, 1961.)

Criminal Law § 160—

Appellant has the burden of showing prejudicial error presented by a proper assignment of error.

Appeal by defendant from *Burgwyn, E. J.,*September 1960 Term, of Beaufort.

Defendant was charged in bills of indictment with assaults with a deadly weapon. The cases were consolidated for trial. Verdicts of guilty of simple assault were returned. Prison sentence of thirty days was imposed. Defendant excepted and appealed.

*Attorney General Bruton and Assistant Attorney General Jones for the State.*

*LeRoy Scott and Carter & Ross for defendant appellant.*

PeR Curiam.

The sufficiency of the evidence to support the charges was not challenged by motion to nonsuit or for directed verdict. To secure a new trial it is necessary for appellant, by proper assignment of error, *Hunt v. Davis,*248 N.C. 69, 102 S.E. 2d 405, to show prejudicial error. *Barefoot v. Rulnick,*252 N.C. 483, 113 S.E. 2d 921. Here appellant failed in both requirements.

Appeal dismissed.
Skip to main content

# Social Security

Search
Menu
Español
Sign in

## 2013 OASDI Trustees Report

Office of the Chief Actuary
Actuarial Publications
2013 Trustees Report
ContentsTablesFigures

LIST OF FIGURES

	II. OVERVIEW

II.D1	Short-Range OASI and DI Combined Trust Fund Ratio

II.D2	OASDI Income, Cost, and Expenditures as Percentages of Taxable Payroll

II.D3	Number of Covered Workers Per OASDI Beneficiary

II.D4	OASDI Cost and Non-interest Income as a Percentageof GDP	

II.D5	Cumulative Scheduled OASDI Income Less Cost,From Program Inception Through Years 2012-87

II.D6	Long-Range OASI and DI Combined Trust Fund Ratios Under Alternative Scenarios

II.D7	Long-Range OASI and DI Combined Trust Fund Ratios From Stochastic Modeling

II.D8	OASDI Annual Balances: 2012 and 2013 Trustees Reports

	IV. ACTUARIAL ESTIMATES

IV.A1	Short-Range OASI and DI Trust Fund Ratios

IV.B1	Long-Range OASI and DI Annual Income Rates and Cost Rates

IV.B2	Number of OASDI Beneficiaries Per 100 Covered Workers

IV.B3	Long-Range OASI and DI Trust Fund Ratios

IV.B4	OASDI Annual Balances: 2012 and 2013 Trustees Reports

	V. ASSUMPTIONS AND METHODS UNDERLYINGACTUARIAL ESTIMATES

V.C1	Primary-Insurance-Amount Formula for Those Newly Eligible in 2013	

V.C2	Maximum-Family-Benefit Formula for Those Newly Eligible in 2013	

V.C3	DI Disability Incidence Rates, 1970-2090 

V.C4	DI Disability Termination Rates, 1970-2090

V.C5	Comparison of DI Disability Incidence Rates, Termination Rates and Conversion Ratios Under Intermediate Assumptions, 1970-2090

V.C6	DI Disability Prevalence Rates, 1970-2090 

	VI. APPENDICES

VI.E1	Long-Range OASDI Cost Rates From Stochastic Modeling

VI.E2	Long-Range OASDI Trust Fund Ratios From Stochastic Modeling

VI.E3	OASDI Cost Rates: Comparison of Stochastic to Low-Cost, Intermediate, and High-Cost Alternatives

VI.E4	OASDI Trust Fund (Unfunded Obligation) Ratios: Comparison of Stochastic to Low-Cost, Intermediate, and High-Cost Alternatives	

VI.F1	Estimated OASDI Income and Cost in CPI-indexed 2013 Dollars, Based on Intermediate Assumptions

Footer menu
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAFAEL FERGUSON,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

D. TURNER, C/O for CDCR; et al.,

Defendant

- Appellees,

and

M. VILLA, Sergeant for CDCR; et al.,

Defendants. No. 18

- 17238

D.C. No. 1:18

- cv

- 00182

- AWI

- EPG

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Anthony W. Ishii, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 18, 2019 **

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Rafael Ferguson appeals pro se from the district

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

NOV 26 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 18

- 17238

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging First and Eighth

Amendment claims

. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de

novo. Hamilton v. Brown , 630 F.3d 889, 892 (9th Cir. 2011) (dismissal under 28

U.S.C. § 1915A ); Barren v. Harrington , 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir. 1998)

(order) (dismissal unde r 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)) . We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Ferguson’s claims against the

Calipatria State Prison defendants as barred by the applicable statute of limitations.

See Butler v. Nat’l Cmty. Renaissance of Cal

. , 766 F.3 d 1191, 1198 (9th Cir. 2014)

( § 1983 claims are governed by forum state’s statute of limitations for personal

injury claims); see also Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 335.1 (two

- year statute of

limitations for personal injury claims ).

The district court properly dismissed Ferguson’s remaining claims because

Ferguson failed to allege facts sufficient to state a plausible claim for relief

. See

Hebbe v. Pliler , 627 F.3d 338, 341

- 42 (9th Cir. 2010) (although pro se pleadings

are to be cons trued liberally, a plaintiff must present factual allegations sufficient

to state a plausible claim for relief); see also Ashcroft v. Iqbal

, 556 U.S. 662, 678

(2009) ( a plaintiff must allege facts that “allow[] the court to draw the reasonable

inference th at the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged”).

AFFIRMED

.
<PAGE>


                                   [GRAPHIC]

                              THE STATE OF TEXAS

                              SECRETARY OF STATE


                           CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                      OF

                           FOREVER ENTERPRISES, INC.
                   FORMERLY: LINCOLN HERITAGE CORPORATION
                               FILE NO. 783034


The undersigned, as Secretary of State of Texas, hereby certifies that the
attached Articles of Amendment for the above named entity have been received
in this office and are found to conform to law.

ACCORDINGLY the undersigned, as Secretary of State, and by virtue of the
authority vested in the Secretary by law, hereby issues this Certificate of
Amendment.

Dated:           March 10, 2000

Effective:       March 10, 2000





[SEAL OF TEXAS]
                                     /s/ Elton Bomer                AH
                                   -----------------------------------
                                             Elton Bomer
                                          Secretary of State



<PAGE>
<PAGE>

                                                            FILED
                                                     In the Office of the
                                                  Secretary of State of Texas

                                                          MAR 10 2000

                                                      Corporations Section


                           ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT

Pursuant to the provisions of the Texas Business Corporation Act, the
undersigned corporation hereby amends its Articles of Incorporation, and for
that purpose, submits the following statement:

1. The name of the corporation is:  Lincoln Heritage Corporation

2. Article I of the Articles of Incorporation is hereby amended so as to read
as follows:  The name of the Corporation is Forever Enterprises, Inc.

3. The date of adoption of each amendment is:  March 9, 2000

4. A) The amendment was approved by shareholders and the number of shares
   outstanding and the number of shares entitled to vote are as follows:

   Class            Number Outstanding            Number Entitled
   -----            ------------------            ---------------
                                                  To Vote
                                                  -------

  Common               4,533,259                     4,533,259

b) The number of shares that voted for and against the amendment are as follows:

   Class            Number voted for           Number voted against
   -----            ----------------           --------------------

  Common               4,510,523                        0



Date     March 9, 2000
    -----------------------


                                    Lincoln Heritage Corporation



                                    By  /s/ Brent D. Cassity
                                      --------------------------------------
                                    Brent D. Cassity-Chief Executive Officer
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Level of Monthly Benefits (PIA) | Description of Proposed Provision:      Progressive price indexing of PIA formula factors beginning with individuals newly eligible for OASDI benefits in 2016. Create new bend point at the 60th percentile of earners. Maintain current-law benefits for earners at the 60th percentile and below and reduce upper 2 formula factors (32% and 15%) such that maximum worker benefit grows by inflation rather than the growth in average wages. |
|---------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2009 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified August 26, 2009 |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. AD16-16-000]

Take notice that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission plans to hold a technical conference in the above-captioned docket on implementation issues under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978, 16 U.S.C. 796(17)-(18), 824a-3 (2012) (PURPA). The technical conference will take place on June 29, 2016. The conference will be held at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426. The technical conference will bewebcast and transcribed.

Further information concerning topics and speakers, as well as matters relevant to the organization of the technical conference, will be provided at a later date in supplemental notices.

Dated: February 9, 2016.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2016-03016 Filed 2-12-16; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual Balance 

in 75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

B

7

-1.70% -4.20% 1.15% 3.47% -0.55% 

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2008 Trustees Report Office of the Chief A

July 16, 2008

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Level of Monthly Benefits (PIA)

Proposed Provision: Progressive price indexing of PIA formula factors beginning with indivieligible for OASDI benefits in 2015. Create new bend point at the 40th percentile of earnercurrent-law benefits for earners at the 40th percentile and below and reduce upper 2 formuand 15%) such that maximum worker benefit grows by inflation rather than the growth in av

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this 

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

0.02.04.06.08.0

10.012.014.016.018.020.0

2008 2018 2028 2038 2048 2058 2068 2078

Year

Percent

Cost rates with this provisionCost rates under present lawIncome rates with this provisionIncome rates under present law

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

 (assets as a percentage of annual expe

0

100200300400500600700800900

1000

2008 2018 2028 2038 2048 2058 

Year

Percent

Present law With this p
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 27, 2024.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, June 27, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A24D0369. WILLIAM HAYWOOD GORDON v. HENRY COUNTY BOARD OF 

EDUCATION .

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

SUCV2022002362
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 29 (Friday, February 12, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 7549]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02889]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2012-N-0247]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office 
of Management and Budget Approval; Guidance for Industry on Formal 
Meetings With Sponsors and Applicants for Prescription Drug User Fee 
Act Products

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled ``Guidance for Industry on Formal 
Meetings With Sponsors and Applicants for Prescription Drug User Fee 
Act Products'' has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FDA PRA Staff, Office of Operations, 
Food and Drug Administration, 8455 Colesville Rd., COLE-14526, Silver 
Spring, MD 20993-0002, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a4f4f6e5f7d0c5c2c2e4c2c0c58accccd78ac3cbd2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="baeae8fbe9cedbdcdcfadcdedb94d2d2c994ddd5cc">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 21, 2015, the Agency submitted a 
proposed collection of information entitled ``Guidance for Industry on 
Formal Meetings With Sponsors and Applicants for Prescription Drug User 
Fee Act Products'' to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 
3507. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays 
a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the 
information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0429. 
The approval expires on December 31, 2018. A copy of the supporting 
statement for this information collection is available on the Internet 
at http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.

    Dated: February 8, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-02889 Filed 2-11-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVA NIA** 

IN RE: ORDER AMENDING RULES 182 AND 1182 OF THE RULES OF JUVENILE COURT PROCEDURE : : : : : : : NO. 668

SUPREME COURT RULES DOCKET

**ORDER**
**PER CURIA M**  **AN D NOW** , this 13th day of July, 201 5, upon the recommendation of the Juvenile Court Procedural Rules Committee, the proposal having been submitted without publication pursuant to Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(a)(3): **IT IS**  **ORDERED** pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania that the modifications to Rules 182 and 1182 of the Rules of Juvenile Court Procedure are approved in the attached form. This **ORDER** shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and shall be effective August 1, 201 7

.
Additions to the rule are shown in bold and are underlined. Deletions from the rule are shown in bold and brackets.