alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 -0.25 -0.34 -7% -8%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

September 15, 2023

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Level of Monthly Benefits

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: B5.3. Beginning for those newly eligible in 2024, reconfigure the special minimum 

benefit: (a) A year of coverage is defined to be either a year in which 4 quarters of coverage are earned or 

a child is in care. Childcare years are granted to parents who have a child under 5, with a limit of 8 such 

years. (b) At implementation, set the PIA for 30 years of coverage equal to 125 percent of the monthly 

poverty level (about $1,416 in 2022). For those with under 30 years of coverage, the PIA per year of 

coverage over 10 years is $1,416/20 = $70.80. (c) Index the initial PIA per year of coverage by wage 

growth for successive cohorts.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision
EXHIBIT 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Friedhelm Blobel, Chief Executive Officer of SciClone
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                                                
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: March 13, 2008 |  |  |  | /S/    FRIEDHELM BLOBEL,
PH.D.                 
|                     |  |  |  | Friedhelm Blobel, Ph.D. Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be
retained by SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 33 (Friday, February 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9324]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3997]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Notice of Environmental Technologies Trade Advisory Committee 
(ETTAC) Meeting

ACTION: Notice of Open Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pending availability of the Environmental Technologies Trade 
Advisory Committee (ETTAC) members, ETTAC will hold its next meeting to 
discuss future projects and current issues which influence the export 
of U.S. environmental technologies.

DATES: Monday, March 13, 1995, 9:00 am-4:00 pm.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 
Room 4830, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 
20230.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: The meeting will be open to the public. Seating 
is limited and will be on a first come, first serve basis.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anne Alonzo, Office of Environmental 
Technologies Exports, Room 4324, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230, phone (202) 
482-5225, facsimile (202) 482-5665, TDD 1-800-833-8723.

    Dated: February 13, 1995
Carlos Montoulieu
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Technologies 
Exports
[FR Doc. 95-3997 Filed 2-16-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DR-P
**Exhibit 31.02**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 15 U.S.C. SECTION 7241,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, **DANIEL W. FAIRFAX**,certify that:

1.    I havereviewed this Form 10-Q of GoRemote Internet Communications, Inc.;

2.    Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.    Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and wehave:

a)           Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)          Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)           Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)           Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)          Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: June 9, 2005 | By:    | /s/ DANIEL W. FAIRFAX                                     |
|-------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|                    |   | Daniel W. Fairfax                                         |
|                    |   | Senior Vice President & Chief Financial  Officer |

 

----
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# PHOTOS ANDVIDEOS

Search

Search

                                - All Images 
                                - Other 
                                - Space Shuttle 

                                - Upload Date
                                - Photo Date
                                - Title

-  FIRST 
-   
-   
- 2
- 3
- 4 (current)
- 5
- 6
-   
-   
-  LAST
**EXHIBIT 23**

**Independent Auditors’ Consent**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Numbers 33-57634, 33-58290, 33-63628, 33-79150, and 333-79219 on Form S-8, and 333-63492 on Form S-3 of USFreightways Corporation of our report dated January 30, 2003 (March 17, 2003 as to Note 14), which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the change in accounting for goodwill and intangible assets, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of USFreightways Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2002.

 

|                            |   |   |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                 |   |   |        |
| Chicago, IllinoisMarch 17, 2003 |   |   |   |
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Shondel Sundwall

, * From the 244 th District

Court of Ector County,

Trial Court No. C

- 38,920

.

Vs. No. 11

- 12

- 00141

- CR * March 14, 2014

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C.J

. (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson , J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is

no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s

opinion, the judgment of the trial c ourt is in all things affirmed.
**Exhibit 10.73**

** **

Mr. MARIO MAURI

In person

REGISTERED LETTER TO BEDELIVERED IN PERSON

We are pleased toinform you that following our understanding, Management has the pleasure ofappointing you in the position of COMMERCIAL MANAGER as of 3/1/1998.

Your qualification willbe “CLIENT SERVICE OPERATIONS DIRECTOR”.

The total grosssalary will be increased to 100 million annually distributed in 14 monthlyinstallments. It is understood that the higher amount versus the level minimumswill be included in an item named “reserve future increase account” andtherefore may be absorbed in the future.

You will also continue tobenefit from a company car in the future.

All otherconditions compatible with your new functions remain the same.

Concerning theBONUS, it will be studied by Management in the following month and agreed uponwith you. However, it will be paid at the unquestionable discretion ofManagement.

Wishing you goodluck in your work, we remain sincerely.

Milan, 3/2/1998

WALSH ITALIA SRL

[signature]

Legal Representative

For agreement

----
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-23-00237-CV

MARVIN HUNT AND MICHAEL SMITH,

Appellants

V.

CENTREPORT LANDING APARTMENTS,

Appellee

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from County Court at Law 

No. 1

of Tarrant County (2023-003399-1)

December 21, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of 

prosecution.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Brian Walker

 Justice Brian Walker
#### Brenda Kay MONROE et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF the CITY OF JACKSON, TENNESSEE, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 77-1123.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Aug. 9, 1978.

Avon N. Williams, Jr., Nashville, Tenn., J. Emmett Ballard, Jackson, Tenn., Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, Drew Days III, NAACP Legal Defense & Educ. Fund, Inc., Kellis E. Parker, Bill Lann Lee, Melvyn R. Leventhal, New York City, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Sidney W. Spragins, Jackson, Tenn., Nat Douglas, Kaydell Wright, U. S. Dept. of Justice, Civil Rights Div., Washington, D. C., for defendants-appellees.

Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, EDWARDS, Circuit Judge, and PECK, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

We have this date filed a per curiam opinion in case No. 76-2389, styled *Monroe v. County Board of Education of Madison County, Tennessee,*583 F.2d 263. That appeal and the present appeal were heard by this Court on the same day, and both were perfected by plaintiffs to test the adequacy of the compensation allowed their attorneys by the district court in these long-drawn-out school desegregation cases.

In that per curiam opinion citations are made to an opinion of the Supreme Court and to numerous opinions of this court and of the district court. We therein reach the conclusion that the Emergency School Aid Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1617 and the Civil Rights Attorney’s Fees Award Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. § 1988 were applicable, and for the reasons and upon the authorities stated and relied on in that opinion we here similarly conclude the Acts’ application in this case. Appellees’ contention that appellants were not the “prevailing party” within the meaning of the Acts is rejected out of hand.

This appeal was perfected from an order entered November 29, 1976, awarding compensation to plaintiffs-appellants’ attorneys for services through 1973 in the amount of $2500, and for services rendered since that time for $2500, and assessing the total of $5000 to be paid by defendants as a part of the costs. An earlier award of $5000 was approved by this Court in *Monroe v. Board*
      *582
      *of Commissioners of City of Jackson, Tennessee,*453 F.2d 259 (6th Cir. 1972), which presumably has been paid. For the reasons set forth in the aforementioned per curiam opinion, we here also conclude in this case with which we have had long and detailed familiarity, and in which the additional delay of another remand would only further unduly postpone the award of compensation, that such a remand is to be avoided. Based upon all of the factors and circumstances which we deem to be relevant, we conclude that $47,833.73 would be a reasonable fee for services performed by plaintiffs-appellants’ attorneys during the entire course of this litigation to date.

Against that sum should be credited the $5000 previously paid pursuant to our decision reported in 453 F.2d 259, leaving a balance now due of $42,833.73. The cause is remanded for the entry of judgment in that amount, to be paid by the defendants-appellees in their official capacities as a part of the costs.

SO ORDERED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 4, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51151

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MIGUEL DERAS-VASQUEZ, also known as Cesar Acosta-Martinez,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas 

USDC No. 3:06-CR-876-ALL

--------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and CLEMENT, Circuit

Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Miguel DerasVasquez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate

criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance

is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
##### 



EXHIBIT 23


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in
Registration Statement Numbers 33-57634, 33-58290, 33-63628,
33-79150, 333-79219, 333-63492, 333-105105, and 333-109957 on
Form S-8 of USF Corporation of our report dated
March 12, 2004 (which report expresses an unqualified
opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to the
change in accounting for goodwill and intangible assets, and
change in revenue recognition), appearing in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K of USF Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 2003.



|                          | 
|------------------------- | 
|/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP | 
|                          | 
|Deloitte & Touche LLP     | 

Chicago, Illinois

March 12, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 29 (Monday, February 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 8223]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3552]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army


Yakima Training Center Cultural and Natural Resources Committee--
Technical Committee

AGENCY: HQ, I CORPS & Fort Lewis, DOD.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following 
committee meeting:

    Name of Committee: Yakima Training Center Cultural and Natural 
Resources Committee--Technical Committee.
    Date of Meeting: March 9, 1995.
    Place: Yakima Training Center, Building 266, Yakima, Washington.
    Time: 1:00 p.m.
    Proposed Agenda: Cultural and Natural Resources Management Plan 
development.
    All proceedings are open. For future information contact Stephen 
Hart, Chief, Civil Law, (206) 967-4540.
Kenneth L. Denton,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-3552 Filed 2-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3856 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3856

  To prohibit the importation of uranium from the Russian Federation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 16, 2022

 Mr. Barrasso (for himself, Ms. Lummis, Mr. Marshall, and Mr. Cramer) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
               Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit the importation of uranium from the Russian Federation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON IMPORTATION OF URANIUM FROM THE RUSSIAN 
              FEDERATION.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 3112A of the USEC 
Privatization Act (42 U.S.C. 2297h-10a) or any other provision of law, 
the importation of articles of the Russian Federation classifiable 
under subheading 2612.10, 2844.10, 2844.20, and 2844.30 of the 
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is prohibited.
    (b) Effective Date.--The prohibition under subsection (a) applies 
with respect to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the date that is 45 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
23.1  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM  We consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 of
HF Financial Corp. (333-103138, 333-83940, 333-50299 and 333-50313) pertaining
to the HF Financial Corp. 2002 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, the Retirement
Savings Plan, the 1991 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, and the 1996 Director
Restricted Stock Plan of our report dated September 18, 2009, accompanying
the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K
of HF Financial Corp. for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009.   /s/ Eide Bailly, LLPSioux Falls, South
  DakotaSeptember 18, 2009
### **Exhibit 32.02**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.**

 

**SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

 

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

 

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the GRIC Communications, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for thequarterly period ended September 30, 2003, I, Kim Silverman, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge based on a reviewof the Report: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company forthe period covered by the Report.

 

 
| Date:  November 14, 2003 | By:    | /s/ Kim S. Silverman                         |
|------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|                               |   | Kim S. Silverman                             |
|                               |   | Vice President & Chief Financial Officer |

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to GRIC and will be retained by GRIC and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----