alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7869
FRANK M. GASTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusPARKER EVATT, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections; MICHAEL J. CAVANAUGH, Commissioner of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-1803-2-20AJ) Submitted: April 29, 1998 Decided: May 15, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frank M. Gaster, Appellant Pro Se. Larry Cleveland Batson, Robert E. Peterson, William Ansel Collins, Jr., Lesli Brown Darwin, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Janet L. Paduhovich, Carl Norman Lundberg, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION, PAROLE & PARDON SERVICES, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny in forma pauperis and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. Gaster v. Evatt , No. CA-97-1803-2-20AJ (D.S.C. Dec. 11, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           8,114
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,980
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                13,705
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     42,172
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           7,172
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             7,265
<LOANS>                                        197,048
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,560
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 284,535
<DEPOSITS>                                     253,710
<SHORT-TERM>                                       284
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,629
<LONG-TERM>                                      3,627
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,898
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,387
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 284,535
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,881
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  772
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   110
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 4,763
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,221
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,273
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,490
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      105
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   5
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,227
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    820
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         655
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       655
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.70
<LOANS-NON>                                        361
<LOANS-PAST>                                       852
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,512
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       77
<RECOVERIES>                                        20
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,560
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,560
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            263
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      23.1**











**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Forms S-3 (No. 333-106608, No. 333-108924, No. 333-10754, No. 333-110752, No.
      333-82496, No. 333-91225, No. 333-91235, No. 333-17105, No. 333-122391, No.
      333-122392 and No. 333-132048) and Forms S-8 (No. 333-109595 and No. 333-82410)
      of SpatiaLight, Inc. of our reports dated March 6, 2006 relating to the
      consolidated financial statements of SpatiaLight, Inc., SpatiaLight, Inc.
      management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
      reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
      of
      SpatiaLight, Inc., included in this Annual Report on Form  10-K
      for
      the year ended December 31, 2005.











ODENBERG, ULLAKKO, MURANISHI & CO. LLP





San
      Francisco, California


March
      14,
      2006






82
#### GEORGE P. STREET v. BEAUFORT FISH SCRAP AND OIL COMPANY and W. J. SWAN, Trustee.

(Filed 7 October, 1931.)

Insurance N e — Holder of tax sale certificate is not entitled to proceeds of policy of fire insurance covering premises.

Tbe assignee of a tax sale certificate bas no title to or estate in tbe land described in tbe certificate and, upon destruction of tbe property by fire, be is not entitled to tbe proceeds of a policy of fire insurance *411covering the premises, and ins motion for an order restraining the insured from collecting on the policy and for a receiver to collect the proceeds for payment of the amount of the certificate is properly denied.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Frizzelle, J.,*at Chambers in New Bern, on 8 April, 1931. From Cabteret.

Affirmed.

This is an action to foreclose a tax sale certificate wbicb was transferred and assigned to plaintiff by Carteret County. It is alleged in the complaint that said tax sale certificate is a lien on certain lands and premises owned by the defendants. This allegation is denied in the answer filed by defendants.

Since the commencement of the action the buildings located on said land at the date of their assessment for taxation have been destroyed by fire. At the date of the fire the said buildings were insured against loss or damage by fire in a large sum by a policy of insurance issued to the defendants.

Plaintiff moved in this action for an order restraining the defendants from collecting or receiving the proceeds of the policy of insurance and for the appointment of a receiver with full power and authority to take and receive from the insurance company a sum sufficient in amount for the payment of the tax sale certificate, with interest and costs. This motion came on for hearing, and was denied.

From the order denying his motion, the plaintiff appealed to the Supreme Court.

*Ward & Ward for plaintiff.*

*Moore & Duwn and JR. JE. Whitehurst for defendants.*

CoNNOR, J.

There is no error in the order denying the motion of the plaintiff in this action.

The plaintiff had no title to or estate in the land described in the tax sale certificate, or in the buildings located on said land. He had merely a lien for the amount of the taxes levied on said land as the property of the defendants, for the year 1928. He had no rights under the policy of insurance issued to the defendants and in force at the date of the fire. He, therefore, has no claim to the proceeds of the fire insurance policy which was issued to the defendants. See *Byrd v. Ins. Co., ante,*407. The order is

Affirmed.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-23-00054-CR

IN RE Martin Barron GALVAN

Original Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 15, 2023

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED 

On January 30, 2023, relator filed a motion to dismiss his petition for writ of mandamus. 

We grant the motion and dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus. The stay imposed on January 

13, 2023 is lifted.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 12553CR, styled State of Texas v. Martin Barron Galvan, pending in the 

County Court, Kinney County, Texas, the Honorable Todd Alexander Blomerth presiding.
**Exhibit 10.1****Remote Knowledge, Inc.****Summary of Director Compensation**At the present time, all of our outside, non-employee, directors are granted 10,000 options perquarter for the three-year terms for which they are elected. At each annual meeting, the newlyelected Class A, B, or C directors will receive the new grant upon their election with an exerciseprice based on the market price for our common shares on the date of election. The chairman of ouraudit committee receives an additional 5,000 options per quarter as additional compensation for theservices in that position. All of the options vest at the rate of 10,000 options per quarter served(in arrears). Should a director resign during his term of office, all unvested options expire. Thechairman of our audit committee’s additional options also vest at the rate of 5,000 per quarter inarrears, also commencing on the date of his election.August 11, 2006
EXHIBIT
      23.2





CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
      Form S-3 **** (File
      Nos. 333-90017,
      333-76614, 333-92174 and 333-102334) and on
      Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-88442,
      33-99196, 33-94974, 333-65799, 333-36159, 333-82418 and 333-82416 )
      of
      Acorn Factor, Inc. (formerly
      Data Systems & Software, Inc.) of
      our
      report dated March 29, 2006 except
      for Notes 2, 3 and 21 which are as of October 4, 2006, on
      Comverge, Inc. and Subsidiaries, with respect to the consolidated financial
      statements and financial statement schedule of Comverge, Inc. and Subsidiaries
      as of December 31, 2004 and 2005 for each of the three years in the period
      ended
      December 31, 2005 ,
      which
      appears in this Form 10-K/A.





/s/
      PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP





Atlanta,
      Georgia


October
      11, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      11,514,877
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         468,606
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             3,430,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      55,370,348
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        53,667,382
<LOANS>                                    131,499,085
<ALLOWANCE>                                 (1,935,172)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             215,145,244
<DEPOSITS>                                 167,619,358
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,747,193
<LONG-TERM>                                 24,042,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,498
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,733,195
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             215,145,244
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              9,516,084
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            2,349,679
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               563,649
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            12,429,412
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           4,669,834
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,580,172
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        6,849,240
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  482,599
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              39,022
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              6,341,126
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,338,420
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   2,338,420
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,702,598
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .49
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.84
<LOANS-NON>                                    963,617
<LOANS-PAST>                                   349,851
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              8,688,698
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,831,241
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  795,999
<RECOVERIES>                                   417,331
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,935,172
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,935,172
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

        In connection with the Quarterly Report of bebe stores, inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 1, 2005, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Gregory Scott, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

 

(1)   The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 
| Dated: February 10, 2005 | /s/ Gregory Scott       |
|--------------------------|-------------------------|
|                     | Gregory Scott           |
|                     | Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 8645]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3766]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
[OMB Control No. 9000-0124]


Clearance Request for Capital Credits

AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DOD), General Services Administration 
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Notice of request for an extension to an existing OMB clearance 
(9000-0124).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Uner the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 
U.S.C. 3501), the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Secretariat has 
submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request to 
review and approve an extension of a currently approved information 
collection requirement concerning Capital Credits.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Fayson, Office of Federal Acquisition Policy, GSA (202) 501-
4755.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Purpose

    The FAR clause 52.241-13, Capital Credits, is designed to obtain an 
accounting of Capital Credits due the Government when the Government is 
a member of a cooperative.

B. Annual Reporting Burden

    Public reporting burden for this collection of information is 
estimated to average 2 hours per response, including the time for 
reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and 
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the 
collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate 
or any other aspect of this collection of information, including 
suggestions for reducing this burden, to General Services 
Administration, FAR Secretariat, 18th & F Streets, NW., Room 4037, 
Washington, DC 20405, and to the FAR Desk Officer, Office of 
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 
Washington, DC 20503.
    The annual reporting burden is estimated as follows: Respondents, 
450; responses per respondent, 1; total annual responses, 450; 
preparation hours per response, 2; and total response burden hours, 
900.

C. Annual Recordkeeping Burden

    The annual recordkeeping burden is estimated as follows: 
Recordkeepers, 450; hours per recordkeeper, 1; and total recordkeeping 
burden hours, 450.
    Obtaining Copies of Proposals: Requester may obtain copies of OMB 
applications or justifications from the General Services 
Administration, FAR Secretariat (VRS), Room 4037, Washington, DC 20405, 
Telephone (202) 501-4755. Please cite OMB Control No. 9000-0124, 
Capital Credits, in all correspondence.

    Dated: February 9, 1995.
Beverly Fayson,
FAR Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 95-3766 Filed 2-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-34-M
II 

Calendar No. 326 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3826 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

1304 4th Avenue in Canyon, Texas, as the ‘‘Gary James Fletcher Post 

Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 14, 2022 

Mr. CORNYN (for himself and Mr. CRUZ) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

APRIL 4 (legislative day, MARCH 31), 2022 

Reported by Mr. PETERS, without amendment 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1304 4th Avenue in Canyon, Texas, as the 

‘‘Gary James Fletcher Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GARY JAMES FLETCHER POST OFFICE BUILD4 ING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 1304 4th Avenue in Canyon, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3826 RS

1 Texas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Gary James 

2 Fletcher Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Gary James Fletcher 

7 Post Office Building’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 326 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3826 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States PostBuilding’’. Texas, as the ‘‘Gary James Fletcher Post Office al Service located at 1304 4th Avenue in Canyon, 

APRIL 4 (legislative day, MARCH 31), 2022 

Reported without amendment 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 13.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT**

**TO SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Intertape Polymer Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey Crystal, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and 

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company. 

Date:    March 29, 2017
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN

NO. 03-0 7 -00 036 -CV
M oha m m ad H adiG har bi, aka M . H. G har bi a nd M ike G har bi , A ppe lla nt//

M aj id He m m as i, C r os s- App e lla nt

v. M aj id He m m as i , A ppe lle e // M oha m m ad H adiG har bi, aka M . H. G har bi a nd Mike G harbi, Cross-Appellee

F ROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. 279, 045 , HO NORAB LE ORLI NDA NARAN JO , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D UM O P I N I O N App ell ee/ cros s-app ell antMaj idHem mas i h as n ot if ie d th is C ou

rt tha t a pp e lla nt/ c ro ssappe l l ee Mohammad Ha di Gharbi ha s filed for ba nkruptcy protec tion (United States Ba nkruptcy Court, W.D. Tex as, ca se number 08- 11023-ca g ). Acc ording ly , the appea l is stayed. See11 U. S.C. § 362; Tex. R . App. P . 8. Any party may file a motion to reinstate upon the occurre nce of an e vent that would allow the appe al to proce ed. SeeTex. R. App. P . 8.3. Fa ilure to notify this Court of a lift of the automatic stay

or the conclusion of t he bankruptcy proce eding will result i n the dismissal of the c ase f

or wa nt of prosec ution. SeeTex. R. App. P . 42.3(b).2 __________________________________________ David Pury ear , J ustice Be fore J ustices Patterson, Pury ear and Pember

ton Ba nkruptcy Filed: May

27, 2010