alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.5





Authentisign ID: F5FE8AD5 - BF38 - 473D - B6B1 - 7141F5C74DD6 Authentisign ID: F5FE8AD5 - BF38 - 473D - B6B1 - 7141F5C74DD6 Authentisign ID: B2B57D52 - A6F0 - 477A - A66F - B936173BBFB1 Authentisign ID: B2B57D52 - A6F0 - 477A - A66F - B936173BBFB1



    	 	1	 



     


    



Authentisign ID: F5FE8AD5 - BF38 - 473D - B6B1 - 7141F5C74DD6 Authentisign ID: F5FE8AD5 - BF38 - 473D - B6B1 - 7141F5C74DD6 Authentisign ID: B2B57D52 - A6F0 - 477A - A66F - B936173BBFB1 Authentisign ID: B2B57D52 - A6F0 - 477A - A66F - B936173BBFB1



    	 	2	 



     


    



Authentisign ID: F5FE8AD5 - BF38 - 473D - B6B1 - 7141F5C74DD6 Authentisign ID: F5FE8AD5 - BF38 - 473D - B6B1 - 7141F5C74DD6 Authentisign ID: B2B57D52 - A6F0 - 477A - A66F - B936173BBFB1 Authentisign ID: B2B57D52 - A6F0 - 477A - A66F - B936173BBFB1



    	 	3	 



     


    



Authentisign ID: F5FE8AD5 - BF38 - 473D - B6B1 - 7141F5C74DD6 Authentisign ID: F5FE8AD5 - BF38 - 473D - B6B1 - 7141F5C74DD6 Authentisign ID: B2B57D52 - A6F0 - 477A - A66F - B936173BBFB1 Authentisign ID: B2B57D52 - A6F0 - 477A - A66F - B936173BBFB1



    	 	4	 



     


    



Authentisign ID: F5FE8AD5 - BF38 - 473D - B6B1 - 7141F5C74DD6 Authentisign ID: F5FE8AD5 - BF38 - 473D - B6B1 - 7141F5C74DD6 Authentisign ID: B2B57D52 - A6F0 - 477A - A66F - B936173BBFB1 " Authentisign ID: B2B57D52 - A6F0 - 477A - A66F - B936173BBFB1



    	 	5	 



     


    



Authentisign ID: F5FE8AD5 - BF38 - 473D - B6B1 - 7141F5C74DD6 Authentisign ID: F5FE8AD5 - BF38 - 473D - B6B1 - 7141F5C74DD6 Authentisign ID: B2B57D52 - A6F0 - 477A - A66F - B936173BBFB1 Authentisign ID: B2B57D52 - A6F0 - 477A - A66F - B936173BBFB1



    	 	6	 



     


    



Authentisign ID: F5FE8AD5 - BF38 - 473D - B6B1 - 7141F5C74DD6 Authentisign ID: F5FE8AD5 - BF38 - 473D - B6B1 - 7141F5C74DD6 Authentisign ID: B2B57D52 - A6F0 - 477A - A66F - B936173BBFB1 Authentisign ID: B2B57D52 - A6F0 - 477A - A66F - B936173BBFB1



    	 	7	 



     


    



Authentisign ID: F5FE8AD5 - BF38 - 473D - B6B1 - 7141F5C74DD6 Authentisign ID: F5FE8AD5 - BF38 - 473D - B6B1 - 7141F5C74DD6 Authentisign ID: B2B57D52 - A6F0 - 477A - A66F - B936173BBFB1 Authentisign ID: B2B57D52 - A6F0 - 477A - A66F - B936173BBFB1



    	 	8
EXHIBIT
32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. §1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K
of HF Financial Corp. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended June 30,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Curtis L. Hage, Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.   /s/ Curtis L. HageCurtis L. Hage, Chairman, Presidentand Chief Executive OfficerDate:
  September 18, 2009  
 *A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to HF Financial Corp.
and will be retained by HF Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     EXHIBIT 23

   

    


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



   
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-58256 and 33-68538) of SuburbFed Financial Corp. of our 
report dated February 6, 1998 contained in this Amendment on Form 10-K/A to the 
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997 of
SuburbFed Financial Corp.
    





                                     Cobitz, VandenBerg & Fennessy     


May 11, 1998
Palos Hills, Illinois
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 32 (Thursday, February 16, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 9078]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4004]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FOREIGN CLAIMS SETTLEMENT COMMISSION

F.C.S.C. Meeting Notice No. 5-95


Announcement in Regard to Commission Meetings and Hearings

    The Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, pursuant to its 
regulations (45 CFR Part 504), and the Government in the Sunshine Act 
(5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the scheduling of 
open meetings and oral hearings for the transaction of Commission 
business and other matters specified, as follows:

Date, Time, and Subject Matter

Fri., Feb. 24, 1995 at 11:15 a.m.--Consideration of decisions on 
claims against Iran. Hearing (if required) on Claim No. IR-2781, 
Pittston Stevedoring Corporation.

    All meetings are held at the Foreign claims Settlement Commission, 
600 E Street, NW., Washington, DC. Requests for information, or advance 
notices of intention to observe a meeting may be directed to: 
Administrative Officer, Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 600 E 
Street, NW., Room 6029, Washington, DC 20579. Telephone: (202) 616-
6988.

    Dated at Washington, DC on February 13, 1995.
Jeanette Matthews,
Administrative Assistant.
[FR Doc. 95-4004 Filed 2-14-95; 11:46 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-P
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]

United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 00-9007

IN RE: JAMES LONG, JR.,

Debtor,

JAMES LONG, JR.,

Debtor, Appellant,

v.

MATRIX CAPITAL BANK, AS SUBSTITUTED PARTY FOR

FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION;

NEW AMERICA FINANCIAL; HARBOR FINANCIAL,

Creditors, Appellees,

JOHN P. FITZGERALD,

Trustee.

APPEAL FROM THE BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL

OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

[Hon. James A. Goodman, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge]

[Hon. James B. Haines, Jr., U.S. Bankruptcy Judge]

[Hon. Gerardo A. Carlo-Altieri, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge]
Before

 Boudin, Chief Judge,

Selya and Lynch, Circuit Judges.

James Long, Jr. on brief pro se.

Jonathan D. White and White and White on brief for appellee

Matrix Capital Bank.

August 20, 2001
Per Curiam. After a thorough review of the record

and of the parties’ submissions, we affirm, essentially for

the reasons set out in the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s

decision dated March 31, 2000. We add only that with regard

to the property tax portion of the claim, the mortgage

clearly allows the mortgagee to pay taxes “[i]f . . . there

is a legal proceeding that may significantly affect Lender’s

rights in the Property.” Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Record

Appendix, p. 154. This provision is in accord with that set

out in the Restatement (Third) of Property § 2.2 (1997)

(“[A] mortgagee may expend funds reasonably necessary for

the protection of the security, and may add the sums so

expended to the principal amount secured by the mortgage.

Such expenditures may be made . . . (2) to protect against

the assertion of liens having priority over the mortgage.”).

So far as we can determine from the record, at the

time the mortgagee began paying property taxes on the

mortgagor’s behalf, the Town of Lexington had notified the

mortgagee that taxes were overdue and that a tax sale of the

property was scheduled. The contract allowed the mortgagee

to pay all taxes due and to add that amount to the loan

balance where “a legal proceeding that may significantly
-4-

affect Lender’s rights in the Property” is instigated. The

Town may have been wrong, or the information may have been

out-of-date at the time the mortgagee received it, but

clearly the mortgagee was entitled under the contract to pay

the disputed taxes. Long makes no claim that the Town’s

actions did not constitute a “legal proceeding.”

Affirmed. 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27(c).
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8731-8732]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3684]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Notice of Inventory Completion for Native American Human Remains 
in the Possession of the Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior

ACTION: Notice

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with provisions of the Native 
American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, 25 U.S.C. 3003(d), of 
completion of the inventory of human remains in the possession of the 
Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL.
    A detailed inventory and assessment of these human remains has been 
made by the Field Museum and representatives of the Pawnee Tribe of 
Oklahoma.
    The cranium and mandible of a single individual was acquired by The 
Field Museum in 1894 from Ward's Natural Science Establishment, 
Rochester, NY. Information from Ward's identifies that remains as a 
Pawnee woman killed in Nebraska in September, 1875. There are no 
associated funerary objects. Inventory of the human remains and review 
of the accompanying documentation failed to establish the individual's 
identity.
    Based on the abovementioned information, officials of The Field 
Museum has determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (2), there is a 
relationship of shared group identity which can be reasonably traced 
between these human remains and the Pawnee Tribe of 
Oklahoma. [[Page 8732]] 
    This notice has been sent to officials of the Pawnee Tribe of 
Oklahoma. Representatives of any other Indian tribe which believes 
itself to be culturally affiliated with these human remains should 
contact Jonathan Haas, MacArthur Curator of North American 
Anthropology, The Field Museum of Natural History, Roosevelt Road at 
Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60605, telephone: (312) 922-9410, 
extension 641, before March 17, 1995. Repatriation of these human 
remains may begin after that date if no additional claimants come 
forward.
Dated: February 9, 1995
Francis P. McManamon
Departmental Consulting Archeologist,
Chief, Archeological Assistance Division
[FR Doc. 95-3684 Filed 2-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-F
#### W. B. SMITH v. WESTCHESTER FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, W. B. BARROW and A. HALL JOHNSTON.

(Filed 14 June, 1933.)

Removal of Causes C lb — Cause is removable if separate cause of action is alleged against nonresident.

A nonresident is entitled to the removal of the cause to the Federal Court if the complaint fails to state a cause of action against the resident defendant, or, if from an examination of the complaint, it appears that a separate cause of action is alleged against the nonresident, and the mere allegation of concurrent negligence will not defeat the right of removal.

Civil action, before *Moore, J.*From Henderson.

Tbe plaintiff instituted an action to recover tbe proceeds of a fire insurance policy issued by tbe defendant insurance company, insuring tbe residence of plaintiff, which was destroyed by fire on or about 1 January, 1929. In apt time a petition for removal was filed by tbe nonresident defendant praying a removal of tbe cause to tbe Federal Court upon tbe ground of separability. Tbe clerk entered an order of removal and upon appeal to tbe judge of tbe Superior Court tbe order of tbe clerk was approved and tbe cause removed to tbe District Court of tbe United States for tbe 'Western District of North Carolina. From tbe order of removal plaintiff appealed.

*771
      *Welch Galloway for plaintiff.*

*B. B. Williams for defendant, Fire Insurance Company.*

Pee. Cukiam.

When a nonresident defendant and a resident of this State are sued in a State court the nonresident is entitled to remove .the cause to the Federal Court in the event the complaint fails to state a cause of action against the resident defendant. Even if concurrent negligence is alleged in the complaint, but at the same time it appears from an interpretation and examination of the substance thereof that the charge of concurrent negligence is no more than a hostile gesture or noisy allegation, the right of removal is not thereby defeated or impaired. This Court spoke upon the subject in *Brown v. R. R., ante,*25. The opinion declares: “But however this may be, in addition to charges of concurrent negligence on the part of both defendants, which the movant says is only a conclusion of the pleader, there is also in the present complaint allegation of negligence on the part of the nonresident defendant alone, sufficient in and of itself to constitute a distinct and independent cause of action, which gives rise to a separable controversy.” The *Brown case*rules the case at bar, and the order of removal made by the trial judge is approved.

Affirmed.
#### John Merchant v. Horace P. Herdman.

Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Brady, J.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, James S. Murphy, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Hypertension Diagnostics, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: February 13, 2006     /s/ James S. Murphy     James S. Murphy  Chief Financial Officer
25
S. 3655 

One Hundred Seventeenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty two 

An Act 

To amend the Civil Rights Cold Case Records Collection Act of 2018 to extend 

the termination date of the Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Civil Rights Cold Case Investigations Support Act of 2022’’. 

SEC. 2. CIVIL RIGHTS COLD CASE RECORDS REVIEW BOARD EXTENSION OF TENURE. 

Section 5(n)(1) of Civil Rights Cold Case Records Collection 

Act of 2018 (44 U.S.C. 2107 note; Public Law 115–426) is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘4 years’’ and inserting ‘‘7 years’’; and 

(2) by striking ‘‘4-year period’’ and inserting ‘‘7-year period’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
EXHIBIT 99.1




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Integrated Information
Systems,  Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), for the quarterly period
ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date  hereof  (the "Report"), I, James G. Garvey, Jr., Chairman, Chief Executive
Officer  and  President  of  the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)     The  Report  fully  complies  with  the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m(a) or
78o(d));  and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.

INTEGRATED  INFORMATION  SYSTEMS,  INC.



/s/  James  G.  Garvey
----------------------
James  G.  Garvey,  Jr.
Chairman,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  President

Date:  August  13,  2003



<PAGE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20- 05 59 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CAMERON J. EAGLEMAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including May 21 , 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 16 2021

04/16/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0559
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 22, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9840]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4316]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1044-DR]


California; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of California (FEMA-1044-DR), dated January 10, 1995, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 13, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pauline C. Campbell, Response and Recovery Directorate, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3606.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this disaster is closed effective February 10, 1995.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance.)
Richard W. Krimm,
Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 95-4316 Filed 2-21-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 27 (Thursday, February 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7816]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3173]



[[Page 7816]]

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Public Information Collection Requirements Submitted to OMB for 
Review

January 31, 1995.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Public Law 96-511. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

Bureau of the Public Debt (BPD)

OMB Number: 1535-0112
Form Number: None
Type of Review: Extension
Title: Sale and Issue of Marketable Book-Entry Treasury Bills, Notes, 
and Bonds
Description: These regulations require that bidders in Treasury 
Auctions provide certain information needed to process their request.
Respondents: Individuals or households, Business or other for-profit, 
Non-profit institutions, State, Local or Tribal Government
Estimated Number of Respondents: 1
Estimated Burden Hours Per Response: 1 hour
Frequency of Response: On occasion
Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 1 hour
Clearance Officer: Vicki S. Ott, (304) 480-6553, Bureau of the Public 
Debt, 200 Third Street, Parkersburg, West VA 26106-1328
OMB Reviewer: Milo Sunderhauf, (202) 395-7340, Office of Management and 
Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 
20503.
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-3173 Filed 2-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-40-P
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Activant Solutions Inc. for the three
months ended December 31, 2006;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
    5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:
    By:

/s/ PERVEZ QURESHIPervez QureshiActing Chief Financial Officer