Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 35 / Wednesday, February 22, 1995 / Notices 9859

3 The Commission will accept a late-filed trail

use statements so long as it retains jurisdiction.

49 CFR 1152.29 3 must be filed by March

6, 1995. Petitions to reopen or requests

for public use conditions under 49 CFR

1152.28 must be filed by March 14,

1995, with: Office of the Secretary, Case

Control Branch, Interstate Commerce

Commission, Washington, DC 20423.

A copy of any pleading filed with the

Commission should be sent to

applicant’s representative: James R.

Paschall, Three Commercial Place,

Norfolk, VA 23510.

If the notice of exemption contains

false or misleading information, the

exemption is void ab initio.

NS has filed an environmental report

which addresses the abandonment’s

effects, if any, on the environment and

historic resources. The Section of

Environmental Analysis (SEA) will

issue an environmental assessment (EA)

by February 27, 1995. Interested persons

may obtain a copy of the EA by writing

to SEA (Room 3219, Interstate

Commerce Commission, Washington,

DC 20423) or by calling Elaine Kaiser,

Chief of SEA, at (202) 927–6248.

Comments on environmental and

historic preservation matters must be

filed within 15 days after the EA is

available to the public.

Environmental, historic preservation,

public use, or trail use/rail banking

conditions will be imposed, where

appropriate, in a subsequent decision.

Decided: February 10, 1995.

By the Commission, David M. Konschnik,

Director, Office of Proceedings.

Vernon A. Williams,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–4302 Filed 2–21–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7035–01–P

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE

UNITED STATES

Hearing of the Judicial Conference

Advisory Committee on Rules of

Bankruptcy Procedure

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the

United States, Advisory Committee on

Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.

ACTION: Notice of cancellation of open

hearing.

SUMMARY: The Bankruptcy Rules public

hearing scheduled to be held in

Washington, D.C. on February 24, 1995,

has been cancelled. (Original notice of

hearing appeared in the Federal Register

of November 18, 1994 (59 FR 59793).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

John K. Rabiej, Chief, Rules Committee

Support Office, Administrative Office of

the United States Courts, Washington,

D.C., telephone (202) 273–1820.

Dated: February 15, 1995.

John K. Rabiej,

Chief, Rules Committee Support Office.

[FR Doc. 95–4261 Filed 2–21–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 2210–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Consent

Judgment Pursuant to the Clean Water

Act

In accordance with Departmental

Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby

given that a Consent Judgment in United

States v. Bostic, et al, Civil No. 92–101–

4 (E.D.N.C), was lodged with the United

States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina on November

8, 1994.

The Consent Judgment concerns

alleged violations of section 301(a) of

the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1311(a),

resulting from the defendants’

unauthorized conversion of 147 acres of

pocosin wetlands on a 194-acre site in

Onslow County, North Carolina. Before

agreeing to the terms of the Consent

Judgment, defendants completed

restoration of part of the property to the

satisfaction of the U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency (‘‘EPA’’), the U.S.

Army Corps of Engineers (‘‘Corps’’), and

North Carolina state erosion experts.

Under the Consent Judgment,

defendants would admit liability for

their violations and agree to pay a

$60,000 civil penalty to the United

States. They would further agree to

establish a buffer zone along the

southern edge of the violation site to

protect nearby Mill Creek from future

erosion or development and to then

transfer title of this buffer zone to an

approved third party grantee, such as

the North Carolina Coastal Land Trust,

within 180 days of signing the Consent

Judgment. Failure to create the buffer

zone or to comply with the transfer of

title provision would result in the

payment to the United States of an

additional $40,000 in stipulated

penalties.

The Department of Justice will receive

written comments relating to the

proposed Consent Decree for a period of

30 days from the date of publication of

this notice. Comments should be

addressed to Russell Young, Esquire,

U.S. Department of Justice,

Environmental Defense Section, P.O.

Box 23986, Washington, D.C. 20026–

3986, should refer to United States v.

Bostic, et al., Civil No. 92–101–4

(E.D.N.C.), and should also make

reference to DJ# 90–5–1–1–3715.

The Consent Judgment may be

examined at the Clerk’s Office, United

States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, P.O. Box

25670, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611.

Letitia J. Grishaw,

Chief, Environmental Defense Section,

Environment and Natural Resources Division.

[FR Doc. 95–4227 Filed 2–21–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–01–M

Extension of Comment Period for

Consent Decrees in United States v.

Nalco Chemical Co., et al.

Notice is hereby given that the period

for public comments on the two

proposed Consent Decrees in United

States v. Nalco Chemical Company, et

al., Case No. 91–C–4482 (N.D. Ill.),

lodged on December 22, 1994 with the

United States District Court for the

Northern District of Illinois, has been

extended to and including March 3,

1995. The proposed Consent Decrees

resolve certain claims of the United

States against the settling parties under

the Comprehensive Environmental

Response Compensation and Liability

Act, 42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq., relating to

the Byron Superfund Site in Ogle

County, Illinois. Under the de minimis

Consent Decree, nine settling parties

among the ‘‘drum’’ parties in the case

will pay the United States $94,405.86.

Under the second de minimis Consent

Decree, six settling parties among the

‘‘IPC customer’’ parties in the case will

pay the United States $429,045.17.

The United States published notice of

the lodging of the Consent Decrees in

the Federal Register on January 10,

1995. 60 FR 2613 (1995). In response to

a request for an extension of the public

comment period, the United States has

elected to extend the comment period

and to accept public comments received

no later than March 3, 1995. Comments

should be addressed to the Assistant

Attorney General of the Environment

and Natural Resources Division,

Department of Justice, Washington, DC

20530, and should refer to United States

v. Nalco Chemical Company, et al., D.J.

Ref. No. 90–11–3–687.

The proposed Consent Decrees may

be examined at the Office of the United

States Attorney for the Northern District

of Illinois, 219 S. Dearborn St., Chicago,

Illinois 60604; the Region V Office of

the United States, Environmental

Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson

Street, Chicago, Illinois 60604; and at

the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G

Street, NW., 4th Floor, Washington, DC

20005 (202–624–0892). A copy of the