alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 36 (Thursday, February 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 10082]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4329]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

Addendum to Report 2051, Released     1/13/95; Additional 
Petition for Reconsideration of Action in Rulemaking Proceeding: MM 
Docket No. 92-266 and MM Docket No. 93-215

Date: February 15, 1995.
    Engle Broadcasting has demonstrated that the following Petition for 
Reconsideration was timely filed at the FCC on January 5, 1995. 
Consequently, it should have appeared on Public Notice on January 13, 
1995 with nine other timely filed Petitions for Reconsideration on MM 
Docket No. 92-266 and MM Docket No. 93-215. Since it was omitted from 
that public notice, a new filing period for Oppositions to this 
Petition for Reconsideration will be established.
    This Petition for Reconsideration have been filed and published 
pursuant to 47 CFR 1.429(e). The full text of these documents are 
available for viewing and copying in Room 239, 1919 M Street, N.W., 
Washington, D.C. or may be purchased from the Commission's copy 
contractor ITS, Inc. (202) 857-3800. Opposition to these petitions must 
be filed on or before March 10, 1995. See Section 1.4(b) (1) of the 
Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition must be 
filed within 10 days after the time for filing oppositions has expired.

Subject: Implementation of Section of The Cable Television Consumer 
Protection and Competition Act of 1992--Rate Regulations (MM Docket No. 
92-266 and MM Docket No. 93-215).
Number of Petition Filed: 1

Federal Communications Commission.
William F. Caton,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-4329 Filed 2-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT






Board of Directors
Nittany Financial Corp.

We  have  reviewed  the  accompanying  consolidated  balance  sheet  of  Nittany
Financial  Corp.  and  subsidiaries  as of  March  31,  2001,  and  the  related
consolidated  statements  of income for the  three-month  period ended March 31,
2001 and 2000,  the  consolidated  statement  of cash flows for the  three-month
period ended March 31, 2001 and 2000, and the consolidated  statement of changes
in stockholders'  equity for the three-month  period ended March 31, 2001. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute  of  Certified  Public  Accountants.  A review  of  interim  financial
information  consists  principally  of applying  analytical  and  procedures  to
financial  data and making  inquiries of persons  responsible  for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is
the  expression  of an opinion  regarding the  financial  statements  taken as a
whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material  modifications that should
be made to the  accompanying  financial  statements for them to be in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles.

We have  previously  audited,  in accordance  with generally  accepted  auditing
standards,  the  consolidated  balance  sheet as of December 31,  2000,  and the
related consolidated  statements of income,  changes in stockholders' equity and
cash  flows for the year then ended (not  presented  herein);  and in our report
dated February 9, 2001 we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated
financial statements


/s/ S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.

Wexford, PA
May 10, 2001
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00036-CV

IN RE MARTIN G. CASTILLO, JR. RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of 

the opinion that relief should be denied. The trial court clerk has informed this 

court that the motion relator seeks a ruling on has not been filed.

Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GARDNER, J.

DELIVERED: January 25, 2011

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).
#### J. E. HASTY et al. v. TOWN OF SOUTHERN PINES et al.

(Filed 27 January, 1932.)

(For digest see *Highlands v. Hickory, ante,*167.)

Appeal by plaintiffs from *Finley, J.,*at Chambers in Carthage, on 30 September, 1931. Prom Mooee.

Affirmed.

This is an action to enjoin the defendant, the town of Southern Pines, its mayor and board of commissioners, from exercising as a municipal corporation, within the corporate limits of the town of West Southern Pines, governmental powers, and for judgment declaring that an act of the General Assembly of this State, repealing the statute under which the town of West Southern Pines was incorporated as a municipal corporation, and extending the corporate limits of the town of Southern Pines to include therein the territory included within the corporate limits of the town of West Southern Pines, unconstitutional and void.

The action was heard on a demurrer to the complaint on the ground that the facts stated therein are not sufficient to constitute a cause of action on which the plaintiffs are entitled to the relief demanded.

The demurrer was sustained and the .action dismissed. Plaintiffs excepted and appealed to the Supreme Court.

*B. M. Andrews for plaintiffs.*

*Ernest N. Poate and U. L. Spence for defendants.*

CoNNOB, J.

The town of West Southern Pines in Moore County, North Carolina, was incorporated by an act of the General Assembly *170of this State, chapter 210, Private Laws 1923. It was duly organized and in existence- as a municipal corporation on 3 March, 1931. At its regular session in 1931, the General Assembly enacted chapter 39, Private Laws 1931. This act is entitled, “An act to repeal and abrogate the charter of the town of West Southern Pines in Moore County, and to annex the territory within the territorial limits thereof to the town of Southern Pines.” By its terms this act became in full force and effect on 3 March, 1931.

Plaintiffs, who are citizens of this State and residents of the territory included within the corporate limits of the town of West Southern Pines, challenge the validity of chapter 39, Private Laws 1931, on the ground that the General Assembly was without power, because of constitutional limitations, to enact the same. This challenge cannot be sustained. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with our decision in *Highlands v. Hickory, ante,*167.

Affirmed.
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Retirement Age | Description of Proposed Provision:      Shorten the hiatus in the normal retirement age (start increasing to age 67 for those age 62 in 2010, rather than those age 62 in 2017) and then increase the NRA 2 months per year until the NRA reaches age 68. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2009 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified November 16, 2009 |
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 37 (Friday, February 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 10411]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4524]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

Music Arts Advisory Panel; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Public Law 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting 
of the Music Advisory Panel (Music Recording Section) to the National 
Council on the Arts will be held on March 14-15, 1995 from 9:00 a.m. to 
5:30 p.m. in Room 714, at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania 
Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20506.
    A portion of this meeting will be open to the public from 4:30 p.m. 
to 5:30 p.m. on March 15 for a policy discussion.
    The remaining portions of this meeting from 9:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. 
on March 14 and from 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on March 15 are for the 
purpose of Panel review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendation on 
applications for financial assistance under the National Foundation on 
the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including 
information given in confidence to the agency by grant applicants. In 
accordance with the determination of the Chairman of February 8, 1994, 
these sessions will be closed to the public pursuant to subsection 
(c)(4), (6) and (9)(B) of section 552b of Title 5, United States Code.
    Any person may observe meetings, or portions thereof, of advisory 
panels which are open to the public, and may be permitted to 
participate in the panel's discussions at the discretion of the panel 
chairman and with the approval of the full-time Federal employee in 
attendance.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact the Office of Special Constituencies, National Endowment for 
the Arts, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20506, 202/
682-5532, TYY 202/682-5496, at least seven (7) days prior to the 
meeting.
    Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained 
from Ms. Yvonne Sabine, Committee Management Officer, National 
Endowment for the Arts, Washington, D.C. 20506, or call 202/682-5433.

    Dated: February 17, 1995.
Yvonne M. Sabine,
Director, Office of Council and Panel Operations, National Endowment 
for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 95-4524 Filed 2-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 21, 2012 

d0514 

Order 

 

May 21, 2012 

144582 & (55) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 144582 

 COA: 301503 

Kent CC: 09-013306-FC 

LEONEL FRANCO-AVINA, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 13, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to 

remand is DENIED.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LAWRENCE TYLER HOWARD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-2656

[July 19, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, 

St. Lucie County; Steven J. Levin, Judge; L.T. Case No. 56-2019-CF001586-A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Paul Edward Petillo, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anesha Worthy,

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

DAMOORGIAN, J.

Lawrence Tyler Howard (“Defendant”) appeals his conviction and 

sentence for one count of leaving the scene of an accident involving death 

following an open plea of no-contest, and the denial of his rule 3.800 

motion to correct sentencing error. Defendant raises several issues on 

appeal, only one of which has merit. He argues the trial court erred in 

imposing a special condition of probation prohibiting early termination of 

probation without the State’s approval. We agree and reverse.

By imposing the special condition prohibiting early termination of 

probation without the State’s approval, the trial judge effectively prevented 

the circuit court in the future from exercising its authority to discharge 

Defendant’s probation early. This is impermissible. See Baker v. State, 

619 So. 2d 411, 412 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993) (striking special condition 

providing the defendant could not be considered for early termination of 

probation “because a trial judge is not authorized to divest the Department 

of Corrections of its authority to recommend early termination of 

probation” or “empowered to prevent the circuit court in the future from 
2

exercising its authority to discharge a probationer”); Jones v. State, 666 

So. 2d 191, 192 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (striking condition which prohibited 

early termination of probation until the probationer completed a sex 

offender program because the condition was impermissibly calculated to 

divest the Department of Corrections of its authority to recommend early 

termination of probation and, consequently, to prevent the circuit court in 

the future from exercising its authority to discharge the probationer).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the trial court to strike the 

condition of probation prohibiting early termination of probation without 

the State’s approval. We otherwise affirm Defendant’s conviction and 

sentence.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.

WARNER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOUND IN THE COMPANY'S REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB FOR THE
QUARTER ENDED AUGUST 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                          0001059366
<NAME>                         NBG Radio Network, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                   1
<CURRENCY>                     USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               NOV-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  DEC-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    AUG-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                           1
<CASH>                                                 565,956
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        4,072,376
<ALLOWANCES>                                             1,200
<INVENTORY>                                             26,557
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     6,216,203
<PP&E>                                                 348,917
<DEPRECIATION>                                         147,491
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       7,767,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                1,111,910
<BONDS>                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                             6,782,072
<OTHER-SE>                                            (126,182)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         7,767,800
<SALES>                                              8,488,572
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     8,494,004
<CGS>                                                2,933,556
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        3,922,526
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       2,977
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      1,637,922
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          0
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                         1,637,922
<EPS-BASIC>                                                .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              .11



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 29 (Friday, February 12, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 7550]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02852]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; Review of R13 Research Grants.
    Date: March 16, 2016.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, Room 
3An.12N, 45 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Nina Sidorova, Scientific Review Officer, Office 
of Scientific Review, National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center Drive, Room 
3An.22, Bethesda, MD 20892-6200, 301-594-3663, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#45362c212a372a3324052b2c2228366b2b2c2d6b222a33"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="36455f52594459405776585f515b4518585f5e18515940">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, 
Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and 
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and 
Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental 
Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, 
Special Minority Initiatives; 93.859, Biomedical Research and 
Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 8, 2016.
Melanie J. Gray,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-02852 Filed 2-11-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
LAW OFFICES OF KEITH P. MILLER, P.C. 

ATTORNEYS & COUNSELORS AT LAW

14350 NORTHBROOK, SUITE 150 

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78232 

TELEPHONE 210.524.9040 KEITH P. MILLER 

FACSIMILE 210.267.2982 MEGAN KUCERA

May 11, 2015 

Eloy R. Garcia, District Clerk 

ATTN: BRENDA LEE 

401 N. Britton Avenue, Room 304 

Rio Grande City, Texas 78582 

 Re: Cause No. DC-09-559; Ramiro & Edna Ramos and Federico Salazar, Jr. 

vs. The Unknown Heirs of Tomasa Gonzalez and Narciso Gonzalez 

Dear District Clerk: 

Pursuant to Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(c), please supplement the Clerk’s 

Record with the documents relating to the citation by publication in this matter. More 

specifically, the February 3, 2010 affidavit of Rebecca G. Canales and the January 7, 

2010 Corrected Notice by Citation by Publication, as well as all attachments thereto. 

Additionally, please supplement the Clerk’s Record with the return of citation for the 

following individuals: 

 Adan Ramos 

 Aissa Lynette Salazar 

 Amelia Salazar Yunez 

 Arabela Gonzalez 

 Arlene Luccette Salazar 

 Cindy Ramos-Ramos 

 Dora Lisa Salazar Guerrero 

 Efrain Ramos-Ramos 

 Elia G. Garza 

 Erica Guzman Uribe 

 Gerardo Salazar 

 Gilda Ramos 

 Graciela Ramos-Guerra 

 Hayde Correa 

 Homero Hector Gonzalez 

 Irma Salazar Cisneros 

 Javier J. Gonzalez 

ACCEPTED

04-14-00667-CV

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

5/11/2015 8:36:59 AM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 05/11/2015 8:36:59 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
 Javier Salinas

 Juan Manuel Garcia

 Juan Ramon Gonzales

 Maria Elia Gonzalez Garza

 Maria Eva Ramos-Garcia

 Maria Del Carmen Salazar

 Maria Elsa Guttierez

 Maria Esther Gonzalez

 Maria Emma Bustamante

 Mario Cesar Gonzalez

 Melissa Salazar Longoria

 Omar Garcia

 Pablo Ildefonso Gonzalez

 Roberto (Bobby) Salazar

 Rosa Enna Gonzales

 Sandra Becker

 Sergio L. Bustamante

 Socorro Gonzalez

 Sylvia Ramos

 Veronica Salazar Rivera

Of course, should you need additional information to process this request, please 

do not hesitate to contact me. 

Sincerely, 

 Megan Kucera

Megan Kucera

MK/mlc

cc: Keith E. Hottle, Clerk for the Fourth Court of Appeals
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 28, 2023

NO. 03-22-00512-CR

Qusai Walid Zaqzouq, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 428TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, SMITH, AND JONES

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment adjudicating guilt entered by the trial court. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible 

error in the judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 28, 2023

NO. 03-22-00559-CR

Qusai Walid Zaqzouq, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 428TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, SMITH, AND JONES

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment adjudicating guilt entered by the trial court. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible 

error in the judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.