65290 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 243 / Tuesday, December 19, 1995 / Notices

County Courthouse, Room 160, 223 East

4th Street, Port Angeles, Washington.

AGENDA: This is the first meeting of the

Advisory Council and will serve as an

orientation for the members. General

subjects to be covered will include

swearing in of Council members;

introductions of Sanctuary staff and

Council members; an overview of the

Olympic Coast National Marine

Sanctuary and the National Marine

Sanctuary Program; and a review of

Council operating procedures and

requirements.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: The meeting will

be open to the public. Seats will be

available on a first-come, first-served

basis.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nancy Beres at (360) 457–6622 or

Elizabeth Moore at (301) 713–3141.

Federal Domestic Assistance Catalog Number

11.429 Marine Sanctuary Program

Dated: December 12, 1995.

David L. Evans,

Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for

Ocean Services and Coastal Zone

Management.

[FR Doc. 95–30765 Filed 12–18–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–08–M

National Telecommunications and

Information Administration

Notice of Meeting, Spectrum Planning

and Policy Advisory Committee

(SPAC)

SUMMARY: In accordance with the

provisions of the Federal Advisory

Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. Appendix,

notice is hereby given that the Spectrum

Planning and Policy Advisory

Committee (SPAC) will meet on January

19, 1996 from 9:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. in

Room 1605 at the United States

Department of Commerce, 14th Street

and Constitution Avenue NW.,

Washington, DC.

The Committee was established on

July 19, 1965 as the Frequency

Management Advisory Council (FMAC).

The name was changed in April, 1991,

and in July, 1993, to reflect the

increased scope of its mission. The

objective of the Committee is to advise

the Secretary of Commerce on radio

frequency spectrum planning matters

and means by which the effectiveness of

Federal Government frequency

management may be enhanced. The

Committee consists of nineteen

members, fifteen from the private sector,

and four from the Federal Government,

whose knowledge of

telecommunications is balanced in the

functional areas of manufacturing,

analysis and planning, operations,

research, academia and international

negotiations.

The principal agenda items for the

meeting will be:

(1) Land Mobile Spectrum Planning

Options Report;

(2) Public and Private Understanding

of NTIA’s Mission;

(3) Results of WRC–95;

(4) Public Safety Wireless Advisory

Committee (PSWAC) Update;

(5) Update of Automated ITU

Spectrum Management System.

The meeting will be open to public

observations. Public entrance to the

building is on 14th Street between

Pennsylvania Avenue and Constitution

Avenue. A period will be set aside for

oral comments or questions by the

public which do not exceed 10 minutes

each per member of the public. More

extensive questions or comments should

be submitted in writing before January

11, 1996. Other public statements

regarding Committee affairs may be

submitted at any time before or after the

meeting. Approximately 20 seats will be

available for the public on a first-come,

first-served basis.

This meeting is physically accessible

to people with disabilities. Requests for

sign language interpretation or other

auxiliary aids should be directed to the

Federal Information Relay Service

(FIPS) on 1–800–877–8339.

Copies of the minutes will be

available upon request 30 days after the

meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Inquiries may be addressed to the

Executive Secretary, SPAC, Mr. Richard

A. Lancaster, National

Telecommunications and Information

Administration, Room 4082, U.S.

Department of Commerce, 14th Street

and Constitution Avenue NW.,

Washington, DC 20230, telephone 202–

482–4487.

Dated: December 12, 1995.

Richard A. Lancaster,

Executive Secretary, Spectrum Planning and

Policy Advisory Committee, National

Telecommunications and Information

Administration.

[FR Doc. 95–30730 Filed 12–18–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–60–M

COMMITTEE FOR THE

IMPLEMENTATION OF TEXTILE

AGREEMENTS

Announcement of Import Restraint

Limits for Certain Cotton, Man-Made

Fiber, Silk Blend and Other Vegetable

Fiber Textiles and Textile Products

Produced or Manufactured in the

People’s Republic of Bangladesh

December 13, 1995.

AGENCY: Committee for the

Implementation of Textile Agreements

(CITA).

ACTION: Issuing a directive to the

Commissioner of Customs establishing

limits.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 1, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ross

Arnold, International Trade Specialist,

Office of Textiles and Apparel, U.S.

Department of Commerce, (202) 482–

4212. For information on the quota

status of these limits, refer to the Quota

Status Reports posted on the bulletin

boards of each Customs port or call

(202) 927–5850. For information on

embargoes and quota re-openings, call

(202) 482–3715.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority: Executive Order 11651 of March

3, 1972, as amended; section 204 of the

Agricultural Act of 1956, as amended (7

U.S.C. 1854).

The import restraint limits for textile

products, produced or manufactured in

Bangladesh and exported during the

period January 1, 1996 through

December 31, 1996 are based on limits

notified to the Textiles Monitoring Body

pursuant to the Uruguay Round

Agreements Act and the Uruguay Round

Agreement on Textiles and Clothing

(ATC).

In the letter published below, the

Chairman of CITA directs the

Commissioner of Customs to establish

the 1996 limits. These limits are being

reduced for carryforward applied to the

1995 limits.

A description of the textile and

apparel categories in terms of HTS

numbers is available in the

CORRELATION: Textile and Apparel

Categories with the Harmonized Tariff

Schedule of the United States (see

Federal Register notice 59 FR 65531,

published on December 20, 1994).

Information regarding the 1996

CORRELATION will be published in the

Federal Register at a later date.

The letter to the Commissioner of

Customs and the actions taken pursuant

to it are not designed to implement all

of the provisions of the Uruguay Round

Agreements Act and the ATC, but are