alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 33 (Friday, February 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9408]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4026]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-30, 579]


McCord Winn Textron, Winchester, MA; Certification Regarding 
Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 USC 
2273) as amended by the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988 
(P. L. 100-418), the Department of Labor herein presents the results of 
an investigation regarding certification of eligibility to apply for 
worker adjustment assistance.
    In order to make an affirmative determination and issue a 
certification of eligibility to apply for adjustment assistance each of 
the group eligibility requirements of Section 222 of the Act must be 
met. It is determined in this case that all of the requirements have 
been met.
    The investigation was initiated in response to a petition received 
on December 19, 1994, and filed by a company official and the 
International Union of Electrical Workers, Local 277, on behalf of 
workers at McCord Winn Textron, Winchester, Massachusetts. The workers 
produce automobile fuel pump armatures.
    The Department of Labor surveyed the principal customer of the 
subject firm regarding its purchases of fuel pump armatures in 1992-
1993 and January to November, 1993-1994. The survey revealed that the 
customer is sourcing a large portion of the armatures formerly 
purchased from the subject firm with armatures produced abroad.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the facts obtained in the investigation, I 
conclude that increases of imports of articles like or directly 
competitive with automobile fuel pump armatures produced at McCord Winn 
Textron, Winchester, Massachusetts, contributed importantly to the 
decline in sales or production and to the total or partial separation 
of workers of that firm. In accordance with the provisions of the Act, 
I make the following certification:
    ``All workers of McCord Winn Textron, Winchester, Massachusetts, 
engaged in employment related to the production of automobile fuel pump 
armatures who became totally or partially separated from employment on 
or after December 8, 1993, through two years from the date of 
certification are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under 
Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed in Washington, D.C. this 31st day of January, 1995.

Victor J. Trunzo,

Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 95-4026 Filed 2-16-95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          41,701
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,102
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     75,537
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               134,340
<PP&E>                                         394,197
<DEPRECIATION>                                 170,938
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,449,960
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          818,478
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,158
<OTHER-SE>                                    (200,253)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,449,960
<SALES>                                         37,212
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               901,399
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (864,187)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (864,187)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (864,187)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.05)



</TABLE>
#### Sandra Rosenfeld, Respondent, v Austin Schlecker et al., Appellants.

[772 NYS2d 596]

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Levine, J.), dated January 10, 2003, as denied their motion to dismiss the complaint as time-barred.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for an evidentiary hearing and a new determination on the motion.

CPLR 208 provides for a toll of the statute of limitations where the person entitled to commence an action is under a disability for, among other conditions, insanity *(see Costello v North Shore Univ. Hosp. Ctr. for Extended Care & Rehabilitation,*273 AD2d 190, 191 [2000]). The insanity toll was “meant to extend ... to only those individuals who are unable to protect their legal rights because of an over-all inability to function in society” *(McCarthy v Volkswagen of Am.,*55 NY2d 543, 548 [1982]; *see Barnes v County of Onondaga,*65 NY2d 664 [1985]).

The defendants met their initial burden of establishing, prima facie, that the time to commence an action against them had expired *(see Robertson v Motorola Communications & Elecs.,*299 AD2d 534 [2002]; *Savarese v Shatz,*273 AD2d 219, 220 [2000]; CPLR 214-a). The burden then shifted to the plaintiff to “ ‘aver evidentiary facts’ establishing that the case falls within an exception to the [s]tatute of [l]imitations” *(Assad v City of New York,*238 AD2d 456, 457 [1997], quoting *Siegel v Wank,*183 AD2d 158, 159 [1992]). The certified hospital records submitted by the plaintiff did not resolve the issue in her favor, but created an issue of fact as to the period of time during which she was unable to protect her legal rights. On the paucity of the *462record for the period of time from December 30, 1999, to February 15, 2000, this Court cannot determine whether the plaintiffs disability persisted until February 15, 2000, two years and six months before the filing of the complaint *(see Santana v Union Hosp. of Bronx,*300 AD2d 56, 58 [2002]; *Lynch v Carlozzi,*284 AD2d 865, 868 [2001]; *see also Seppala v Meadowbrook Care Ctr.,*292 AD2d 368, 369 [2002]).

Therefore, in accordance with the parties’ request, we remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for the purpose of holding an evidentiary hearing to determine the period of time the plaintiff was “unable to protect [her] legal rights because of an over-all inability to function in society” *(McCarthy v Volkswagen of Am., supra*at 548; *see Santana v Union Hosp. of Bronx, supra;*CPLR 304; *cf.*CPLR 3211 [c]). A new determination on the motion should be made after that hearing. Altman, J.P., S. Miller, Goldstein and Crane, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 22 (Wednesday, February 3, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 5792]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-01869]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Environmental Research and Education; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Advisory Committee for Environmental Research and 
Education (9487).
    Date/Time: March 30, 2016; 9:00 a.m.-5:30 p.m. March 31, 2016; 
9:00 a.m.-3:00 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Stephen Meacham, Senior Staff Associate, 
Office of Integrative Activities/Office of the Director/National 
Science Foundation (Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#addec0c8cccec5ccc0edc3decb83cac2db"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="790a141c181a11181439170a1f571e160f">[email protected]</span></a>/Telephone: (703) 292-
8040).
    Minutes: May be obtained from http://www.nsf.gov/geo/ere/ereweb/minutes.cfm.
    Purpose Of Meeting: To provide advice, recommendations, and 
oversight concerning support for environmental research and 
education.
    Agenda: (Tentative) Approval of minutes from past meetings. 
Updates on agency support for environmental research and activities. 
Discussion with NSF Director and Assistant Directors. Discussion of 
emerging research topics in environmental science, engineering and 
education. Updated agenda will be available at http://www.nsf.gov/geo/ere/ereweb/minutes.cfm.

    Dated: January 28, 2016.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016-01869 Filed 2-2-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 32 (Thursday, February 16, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9048]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3903]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[NV-030-1430-01; NVN 57169]

Realty Action: Proposed Direct Sale

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The following described public land has been found suitable 
for direct sale to Jack Estill, Jewell Estill and Roger Vehrs, pursuant 
to sections 203 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 
(90 Stat. 2750; 43 U.S.C. 1713):

Mt. Diablo Meridian, Nevada

T. 9 N., R. 36 E.,
    Sec. 5, Lot 3.

    Containing 40.00 acres.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The public land is located in the 
southeastern portion of Mineral County. The land is not required for 
any Federal purpose. The proposed sale is consistent with the Walker 
Resource Management Plan and would be in the public interest. The 
planning document and environmental assessment covering the proposed 
sale are available for review at the Bureau of Land Management, Carson 
City District Office, Carson City, Nevada. The land will not be offered 
for sale until at least 60 days after the date of this notice.
    The proposed direct sale will be made at fair market value. 
Additionally, the purchaser will be required to submit a nonrefundable 
application fee of $50.00 in accordance with 43 CFR 2720 for conveyance 
of unreserved mineral interests in the land.
    The patent when issued will be subject to the following terms, 
conditions and reservations:
    1. A right-of-way for ditches and canals constructed by the 
authority of the United States.
    2. Those rights for road purposes granted to the U.S. Government, 
its successors or assigns, by right-of-way reservation No. N 58290, 
pursuant to the Act of October 21, 1976, (43 U.S.C. 1761).
    The above described land is hereby segregated from appropriation 
under the public land laws, including the mining laws, but not from 
sale under the above cited statute, for 270 days or until title 
transfer is completed or the segregation is terminated by publication 
in the Federal Register, whichever occurs first.

DATES: For a period of 45 days from the date of publication of this 
notice in the Federal Register (April 3, 1995), interested parties may 
submit comments.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent to the Walker Resource Area Manager, 
Bureau of Land Management, 1535 Hot Springs Road, Carson City, NV 
89706-0638. Any adverse comments will be reviewed by the State Director 
who may sustain, vacate, or modify this proposed realty action:

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles J. Kihm, Walker Area Realty 
Specialist, Bureau of Land Management, 1535 Hot Springs Road, Carson 
City, NV 89706-0638; (702) 885-6000.

    Dated: February 6, 1995.
John Matthiessen,
Walker Resource Area Manager.
[FR Doc. 95-3903 Filed 2-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-HC-M
```
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

I, Alberto R. Santa Ines, Chief Financial Officer of Abaxis, Inc. (the “Registrant”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Dated:  June 14, 2006

|   | By:    | /s/   Alberto R. Santa Ines                             |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                         |
|   |   | Alberto R.   Santa Ines                                 |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer and Vice President   of Finance |
Exhibit 23.2

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-13203, 333-61705, 333-71814, 333-92973,
and 333-98633 of Unify Corporation on Form S-8 of our report dated May 23, 2002 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and contains an explanatory
paragraph relating to substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Unify Corporation for the year
ended April 30, 2003.

DELOITTE &
TOUCHE LLP

San
Jose, California
July 15, 2003

---

QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          74,314
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  609,517
<ALLOWANCES>                                   230,785
<INVENTORY>                                     19,852
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               570,111
<PP&E>                                         365,789
<DEPRECIATION>                                 123,965
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,846,539
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          382,257
<BONDS>                                        588,644
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       850,657
<OTHER-SE>                                     (46,247)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,846,539
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,512,499
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,617,006
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              33,234
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (137,741)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (39,890)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (111,447)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (111,447)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.55)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 33 (Friday, February 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9342]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3969]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration


Substance Abuse Treatment Conference Grants

AGENCY: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, Substance Abuse and 
Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), HHS.

ACTION: Clarification notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Public notice was given in the Federal Register on July 25, 
1994, Volume 59, No. 141, pages 37773-37775, that the Center for 
Substance Abuse Treatment is soliciting applications for domestic 
conferences for the purpose of coordinating, exchanging and 
disseminating information in furtherance of its mission to ensure the 
availability of effective treatment and recovery services for 
individuals who suffer from problems related to alcohol and other drugs 
(AOD) of abuse.
    On page 37773, under the Program Description section, it states 
that ``CSAT will provide support for up to fifty percent (to a maximum 
of $50,000) of the total costs of planned meetings and conferences 
sponsored by new or ongoing constituent organizations or coalitions in 
their efforts to provide treatment for drugs of abuse.''
    This funding guideline should have translated into one additional 
criterion under Award Decision Criteria on page 37775, to read as 
follows: ``7. A budget fully documenting that non-CSAT support equals 
at least 50% of the total cost of the conference.''
    All applications received after the publication of this 
clarification notice will be returned to the applicant if the 
application does not provide a budget that fully documents that non-
CSAT support equals at least 50% of the total cost of the conference.
    All future guidance provided to potential applicants who request 
grant application kits will contain this additional award criterion.

    Dated: February 12, 1995.
Richard Kopanda,
Acting Executive Officer, SAMHSA.
[FR Doc. 95-3969 Filed 2-16-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 8661]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3525]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Office of the Secretary


Federal Financial Participation in State Assistance Expenditures; 
Federal Matching Shares for Aid to Families With Dependent Children, 
Medicaid, and Aid to Needy Aged, Blind, or Disabled Persons for October 
1, 1995, through September 30, 1996; Correction

ACTION: Notice of correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice will correct an error listed on the Table of 
Federal Medical Assistance percentages calculated for the State of 
Minnesota for determining the amount of Federal matching in State 
welfare and medical expenditures for Fiscal Year 1996.

EFFECTIVE DATES: The corrected percentage will be effective for each of 
the 4 quarter-year periods in the period beginning October 1, 1995 and 
ending September 30, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Gene Moyer, Office of Health 
Policy, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, 
Room 442E, Hubert H. Humphrey Building, 200 Independence Avenue, SW., 
Washington, D.C. 20201, Telephone (202) 690-7861.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 17, 1994, in notice document 94-
28397 beginning on page 59407, the Office of the Secretary announced 
the Federal Percentages and Federal Medical Assistance Percentages 
(FMAP) for use in determining the amount of Federal matching in State 
welfare and medical expenditures for October 1, 1995 through September 
30, 1996. The percentages are applicable to programs under the Social 
Security Act including Aid to Families With Dependent Children, Foster 
Care and Adoption Assistance, Job Opportunities and Basic Skills 
Training, Medicaid, and Aid to Needy Aged, Blind, or Disabled Persons. 
The Notice provided a Table on page 59408 that listed Federal 
Percentages and Federal Medical Assistance percentages for each of the 
50 States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, 
Guam, American Samoa, and the Northern Mariana Islands. The Federal 
Percentage published for the State of Minnesota is correct at 50.00%. 
The Federal Medical Assistance Percentage for Minnesota is incorrect. 
The Federal Medical Assistance Percentage was published as 53.84%. The 
correct percentage is 53.93%. The Department of Health and Human 
Services regrets the error.

    Dated: February 1, 1995.
Neil J. Stillman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Information Resource Management.
[FR Doc. 95-3525 Filed 2-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-04-M
Exhibit 18  January 21, 2010  Board of Directors and
Management Amylin Pharmaceuticals  Dear Members of the Board
of Directors and Management:  Note 1 of the Notes to
the Consolidated Financial Statements of Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
included in its Form 10-K for the three years ended December 31, 2009
describes a change in the classification of reimbursements of research and
development expenses under collaborative arrangements from revenue under
collaborative arrangements to research and development expense.  There are no
authoritative criteria for determining a preferable method for presenting
reimbursements of research and development expenses under collaborative
arrangements, based on the particular circumstances, however, we conclude that
such change in the method of accounting is to an acceptable alternative method
which, based on your business judgment to make this change and for the stated
reasons, is preferable in your circumstances.  Very truly yours,/s/ Ernst & Young
  LLP
EXHIBIT 23.2









Consent of Independent Auditors







We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the prospectuses constituting part of the registration statements on Form S-3 for the CSB Bancorp, Inc. Share Owner Dividend Reinvestment Plan and on Form S-8 for The Commercial & Savings Bank of Millersburg Profit Sharing and 401(k) Savings Retirement Plan and Trust of our report dated February 1, 2002 on the consolidated balance sheet of CSB Bancorp, Inc. as of December 31, 2001 and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders equity and cash flows for the year then ended, which report is incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K.









/s/   CLIFTON GUNDERSON LLP





Toledo, Ohio

March 29, 2002