Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 14, 1995 / Notices 8353

10. Duke Power Co.

[Docket No. ER95–171–001]

Take notice that on January 23, 1995,

Duke Power Company (Duke), tendered

for filing additional information in the

above-referenced docket.

Comment date: February 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

11. KCS Energy Management Services,

Inc.

[Docket No. ER95–208–000]

Take notice that on February 1, 1995,

KCS Energy Management Services, Inc.

tendered for filing an amendment in the

above-referenced docket.

Comment date: February 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

12. Consumers Power Co.

[Docket No. ER95–472–000]

Take notice that on January 25, 1995,

Consumers Power Company

(Consumers), tendered for filing a

Service Agreement with the Michigan

Power Agency (MPPA) and Wolverine

Power Supply Cooperative, Inc.

(Wolverine), pursuant to Consumer’s

Open Access Transmission Service

Tariff. The filed Service Agreement

extends the availability of transmission

service to MPPA and Wolverine in order

to facilitate operation of the Municipal

Cooperative Coordinated Pool. A copy

of the filing was served upon the MPPA,

Wolverine, and the Michigan Public

Service Commission.

Comment date: February 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

13. Alabama Power Co.

[Docket No. ER95–526–000]

Take notice that on February 1, 1995,

Alabama Power Company filed a letter

agreement dated January 6, 1995,

revising the Contract executed by the

United States of America, Department of

Energy, acting by and through the

Southeastern Power Administration and

Alabama Power Company. The letter

agreement extends the term of the

existing Contract until the effective date

of new arrangements or the filing of a

notice of termination, whichever occurs

first.

Comment date: February 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

14. Consolidated Edison Company of

New York, Inc.

[Docket No. ER95–536–000]

Take notice that on February 1, 1995,

Consolidated Edison Company of New

York, Inc. (‘‘Con Edison’’), tendered for

filing an agreement with Maine Public

Service Company (‘‘MPS’’), to provide

for the sale of energy and capacity. For

energy sold the ceiling rate is 100

percent of the incremental energy cost

plus up to 10 percent of the SIC (where

such 10 percent is limited to 1 mill per

Kwhr when the SIC in the hour reflects

a purchased power resource). The

ceiling rate for capacity is $7.70 per

megawatt hour.

Con Edison states that a copy of this

filing has been served by overnight

delivery upon MPS.

Comment date: February 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

15. Entergy Services, Inc.

[Docket No. ER95–537–000]

Take notice that on February 1, 1995,

Entergy Services, Inc. (Entergy

Services), tendered for filing a

Transmission Service Agreement (TSA)

between Entergy Services and NorAm

Energy Services, Inc. (NES). Entergy

Services states that the TSA sets out the

transmission arrangements under which

the Entergy Operating Companies’ will

provide NES non-firm transmission

service under Entergy Services NonFirm Transmission Service Tariff.

Comment date: February 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, N.E.,

Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance

with Rules 211 and 214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR

385.214). All such motions or protests

should be filed on or before the

comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–3633 Filed 2–13–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Docket No. CP95–191–000, et al.]

Natural Gas Pipeline Company of

America, et al.; Natural Gas Certificate

Filings

February 7, 1995.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America

[Docket No. CP95–191–000]

Take notice that on February 1, 1995,

Natural Gas Pipeline Company of

America (Applicant), 701 East 22nd

Street, Lombard, Illinois, 60148, filed in

Docket No. CP95–191–000 an

application under Sections 7(b) and 7(c)

of the Natural Gas Act for authorization

to abandon facilities and construct new

facilities.

Applicant requests authority for the

following actions:

(1) Abandon 99.93 miles of its 24-inch

Amarillo No. 1 line located in Beaver

County Oklahoma, and Ochiltree,

Hansford and Hutchinson Counties,

Texas and abandon 2.74 miles of its 30-

inch Amarillo No. 1 line located in

Hutchinson County, Texas;

(2) Transfer of this abandoned pipe to

applicant’s affiliate MidCon Gas

Products (MidCon) for use as a gathering

facility;

(3) Construct and operate 17.98 miles

of 30-inch pipeline loop in Hutchinson

County, Texas, at an estimated cost of

$10,800,000 to

Applicant also asks the Commission

to specify that the abandoned pipe line

will be a non-jurisdictional facility

when operated as a gathering line by

MidCon.

Comment date: February 28, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph F

at the end of this notice.

2. Northwest Pipeline Corp.

[Docket No. CP95–195–000]

Take notice that on February 2, 1995,

Northwest Pipeline Corporation

(Northwest), 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake

City, Utah 84108, filed in Docket No.

CP95–195–000, a request pursuant to

Sections 157.205 and 157.211 of the

Commission’s Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205 and

157.211) for authorization to construct

and operate an upgrade of the existing

facilities at the South Vancouver Meter

Station located in Clark County,

Washington, as requested by an existing

firm transportation shipper and

marketer of natural gas, IGI Resources,

Inc. (IGI); all as more fully set forth in

the request which is on file with the

Commission and open to public

inspection.

Specifically, Northwest proposes to

upgrade the South Vancouver Meter
8354 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 14, 1995 / Notices

Station by replacing the existing orifice

plate in the 6-inch orifice meter run

with a larger capacity orifice plate.

Northwest states that this change will

increase the maximum design delivery

capacity of the South Vancouver Meter

Station from 14,167 Dths per day to

approximately 16,667 Dths per day at a

pressure of 400 psig. Northwest states

that the South Vancouver Meter Station

originally was constructed under

certificate authorization in Docket No.

G–1429.

Northwest states the IGI, a marketer of

natural gas, has requested that

Northwest expand the South Vancouver

Meter Station to accommodate an

additional 2,500 MMBtu per day (at 400

psig) of firm delivery capacity under an

existing firm transportation service

agreement dated June 29, 1990, or under

any other duly authorized

transportation agreement.

Northwest states that the total cost of

the proposed facility upgrade at the

South Vancouver Meter Station is

estimated to be approximately $1,000

which will be reimbursed by IGI.

Comment date: March 24, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph G

at the end of this notice.

3. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.

[Docket No. CP95–196–000]

Take notice that on February 2, 1995,

Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation

(Columbia), 1700 MacCorkle Avenue,

S.E., Charleston, West Virginia 25314–

1599, filed request with the Commission

in Docket No. CP95–196–000 pursuant

to Sections 157.205 and 157.211 of the

Commission’s Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (NGA) for authorization

to construct and operate additional

points of delivery, authorized in blanket

certificate issued in Docket No. CP83–

76–000, all as more fully set forth in the

request on file with the Commission and

open to public inspection.

Columbia proposes to construct and

operate new facilities that would

establish ten additional points of

delivery to existing customers that have

asked Columbia to provide firm

transportation. Columbia states that the

estimated cost would be approximately

$150 per tap which would be treated as

a O&M Expense.

Comment date: March 24, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph G

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

F. Any person desiring to be heard or

to make any protest with reference to

said application should on or before the

comment date, file with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission,

Washington, DC 20426, a motion to

intervene or a protest in accordance

with the requirements of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211)

and the Regulations under the Natural

Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). All protests

filed with the Commission will be

considered by it in determining the

appropriate action to be taken but will

not serve to make the protestants parties

to the proceeding. Any person wishing

to become a party to a proceeding or to

participate as a party in any hearing

therein must file a motion to intervene

in accordance with the Commission’s

Rules.

Take further notice that, pursuant to

the authority contained in and subject to

the jurisdiction conferred upon the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

by Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas

Act and the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure, a hearing will

be held without further notice before the

Commission or its designee on this

application, if no motion to intervene is

filed within the time required herein, if

the Commission on its own review of

the matter finds that a grant of the

certificate and/or permission and

approval for the proposed abandonment

are required by the public convenience

and necessity. If a motion for leave to

intervene is timely filed, or if the

Commission on its own motion believes

that a formal hearing is required, further

notice of such hearing will be duly

given.

Under the procedure herein provided

for, unless otherwise advised, it will be

unnecessary for applicant to appear or

be represented at the hearing.

G. Any person or the Commission’s

staff may, within 45 days after issuance

of the instant notice by the Commission,

file pursuant to Rule 214 of the

Commission’s Procedural Rules (18 CFR

385.214) a motion to intervene or notice

of intervention and pursuant to Section

157.205 of the Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a

protest to the request. If no protest is

filed within the time allowed therefor,

the proposed activity shall be deemed to

be authorized effective the day after the

time allowed for filing a protest. If a

protest is filed and not withdrawn

within 30 days after the time allowed

for filing a protest, the instant request

shall be treated as an application for

authorization pursuant to Section 7 of

the Natural Gas Act.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–3634 Filed 2–13–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Docket No. RP93-198–004]

Alabama-Tennessee Natural Gas Co.;

Proposed Change In FERC Gas Tariff

February 8, 1995.

Take notice that on February 3, 1995,

Alabama-Tennessee Natural Gas

Company (Alabama-Tennessee), filed to

revise the filing previously submitted by

Alabama-Tennessee on November 29

1994 in Docket No. RP93–198–003

(November 29 Filing). In particular,

Alabama-Tennessee states that the

instant filing is designed to reflect a

dollar-for-dollar refund of $37,631.73

that Alabama-Tennessee recently

received from Tennessee Gas Pipeline

Company (Tennessee) relating to a

Tennessee billing error.

According to Alabama-Tennessee its

November 29 Filing provided for the

recovery by Alabama-Tennessee of the

net debit balance due and payable by

shippers on Alabama-Tennessee’s

system under Section 33.4(f) of the

General Terms and Conditions of

Alabama-Tennessee’s FERC Gas Tariff,

Second Revised Volume No. 1, resulting

from a true-up performed by AlabamaTennessee following the elimination of

its Transportation Cost Rate

Adjustment. As a further result of the

flow-through of the subject refund,

however, those shippers which owed

Alabama-Tennessee the true-up

amounts shown in the November 29

Filing will now receive a credit.

Alabama-Tennessee proposes that the

November 29 Filing be deemed revised

by the instant filing and that it be

permitted to credit the amount due each

customer under this revised filing on

bills Alabama-Tennessee will be

rendering in March 1995, for services

provided during February, 1995.

Alabama-Tennessee has requested

that the Commission grant such waivers

as may be necessary to accept and

approve the filing as submitted.

Any person desiring to protest said

filing should file a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, NE.,

Washington, DC 20426, in accordance

with Rule 211 of the Commission’s rules

of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR

385.211). All such protests should be

filed on or before February 15, 1995.

Protests will be considered by the

Commission in determining the

appropriate action to be taken but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceeding. Copies of this filing are