alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-7636

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

MARCOS GONZALEZ-DELGADO, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, 

District Judge. (1:04-cr-00084-LHT-DLH-1) 

Submitted: December 16, 2008 Decided: December 24, 2008 

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Marcos Gonzalez-Delgado, Appellant Pro Se. Jill Westmoreland 

Rose, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Marcos Gonzalez-Delgado appeals the district court’s 

order denying his motion to dismiss his indictment, filed 

pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 12(b)(2).* We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. 

Gonzalez-Delgado, No. 1:04-cr-00084-LHT-DLH-1 (W.D.N.C. July 18, 

2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

AFFIRMED

 *

 As the district court noted, Gonzalez-Delgado likely 

intended to bring this motion under Fed. R. Crim. P. 

12(b)(3)(B). However, as relief is unavailable to him under 

either subsection of Rule 12, we find this to be of no 

consequence.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-2014-D-0609]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “Guidance for Industry on Drug Supply Chain Security Act Implementation: Identification of Suspect Product and Notification” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        FDA PRA Staff, Office of Operations, Food and Drug Administration, 8455 Colesville Rd., COLE-14526, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,                         *PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On September 21, 2015, the Agency submitted a proposed collection of information entitled “Guidance for Industry on Drug Supply Chain Security Act Implementation: Identification of Suspect Product and Notification” to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0806. The approval expires on December 31, 2018. A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at                     *http://www.reginfo.gov/​public/​do/​PRAMain.*

 Dated: January 27, 2016.

Leslie Kux,

Associate Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 2016-01784 Filed 2-1-16; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 7538** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. TIAYON KARDELL EVANS , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Easter n District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Raymond A. Jackson , District Judge. ( 2:04

- cr - 00099

- RAJ

- 1; 2:06

- cv - 00162

- RAJ

- JEB )

Submitted : June 17, 2010 Decided: June 23, 2010

Before MOTZ and KING , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dism issed by un published per curiam opinion
. Tiayon Kardell Evans, Appellant Pro Se. Sherrie Scott Capotosto, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Tiayon Kardell Evans seeks to appeal the district
court ’ s order construing his motion to set aside the criminal judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2010) and dismissing it as successive. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006) ; Reid v. Angelone , 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wron g. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, a nd that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that
Evans has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of a ppealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 246 (Friday, December 22, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 66543]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31132]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Project Nos. 2433-004-MI/WI, 2357-003-MI/WI, 2394-006-MI/WI, 2536-009-
MI/WI]


Wisconsin Public Service Corporation, et al.; Notice of Intent to 
Hold Public Meetings in Marinette, Wisconsin to Discuss the Draft 
Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the Proposed Relicensing of 
the Grand Rapids, Chalk Hill, White Rapids, and Little Quinnesec 
Hydroelectric Projects

December 18, 1995.
    On November 22, 1995, the Commission staff mailed the DEIS to the 
Environmental Protection Agency, resource and land management agencies, 
and interested organizations and individuals. This document evaluates 
the environmental consequences of the proposed relicensing of the Grand 
Rapids, White Rapids, Chalk Hill, and Little Quinnesec Hydroelectric 
Projects. The projects are located on the lower Menominee River in 
Menominee and Dickinson Counties, Michigan and Marinette County, 
Wisconsin.
    Two public meetings will be recorded by a court reporter and are 
scheduled to be held at 1 p.m. and 7 p.m. on Thursday, January 4, 1996, 
at the Best Western Riverfront Inn, 1821 Riverside Avenue, Marinette, 
Wisconsin. You are invited to attend either or both public meetings.
    At the meetings, Commission Staff will summarize major DEIS 
findings and recommendations. Resource agency personnel and other 
interested persons will have an opportunity to submit oral and written 
comments on the DEIS for the Commission's public record. Written 
comments on the DEIS may also be sent to: The Secretary, Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426. 
Comments must be received on or before January 16, 1995. All 
correspondence should include the project name and number on the first 
page of the correspondence.
    The DEIS considers recommendations of government agencies, 
nongovernmental organizations, affected Indian tribes, the public, the 
license applicants, and the Commission's staff. It evaluates natural 
and social resource benefits, the economic costs, and the project-
specific and cumulative environmental impacts associated with 
relicensing the projects.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-31132 Filed 12-21-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-14-00113-CR

____________________

BELAL ABEL RAHIM, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On Appeal from the 411th District Court 

Polk County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 19680 

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Belal Abel Rahim has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 42.2. A request to dismiss the appeal is signed by appellant personally and 

joined by counsel of record. No opinion has issued in this appeal. The motion is 

granted, and the appeal is therefore dismissed.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

 
2

______________________________

 HOLLIS HORTON

 Justice

Opinion Delivered May 7, 2014

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 36 (Thursday, February 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 10060]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4380]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Agency Form Under Review by the Office of Management and Budget

    DOC has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for 
clearance the following proposal for collection of information under 
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: Bureau of Export Administration.
    Title: Encryption Software Marketing Survey.
    Agency Form Number: None.
    OMB Approval Number: None.
    Type of Request: New Collection -- prompt review requested.
    Burden: 450 hours.
    Number of Respondents: 150.
    Avg Hours Per Response: 3 hours.
    Needs and Uses: Commerce is surveying encryption software producers 
to evaluate the impact of U.S. export controls on the international 
competitiveness of the U.S. industry. BXA will share this information 
with the Interagency Working Group on Encryption and Telecommunications 
Policy. This report will assist the Administration in determining what, 
if any, changes should be made in export controls affecting encryption 
software.
    Affected Public: Businesses or other for-profit institutions.
    Frequency: One time.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: Don Arbuckle, (202) 395-7340.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Gerald Tache, DOC Forms Clearance Officer, (202) 
482-3271, Department of Commerce, Room 5327, 14th and Constitution 
Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Don Arbuckle, OMB Desk Officer, Room 
10202, New Executive Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20503.

    Dated: February 16, 1995
Gerald Tache,
Departmental Forms Clearance Officer, Office of Management and 
Organization.
[FR Doc. 95-4380 Filed 2-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-CW-F
## Summary Measures and Graphs

- Individual Provisions
- Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable)

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						E3.10: Beginning in 2031, apply 2 percent payroll tax rate on earnings over the wage-indexed equivalent of $300,000 in 2017 (about $522,300 in 2031), with the threshold wage-indexed after 2031. Provide proportional benefit credit for additional earnings taxed, based on the payroll tax rate applied to the additional earnings divided by the full 12.4 percent payroll tax rate.**

|  |  |
|--|--|
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that (1) this
Quarterly Report of MSX International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the fiscal period ended September 28, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Thomas T. Stallkamp
Thomas T. Stallkamp
Chief Executive Officer
November 7, 2003

/s/ Frederick K. Minturn
Frederick K. Minturn
Chief Financial Officer
November 7, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to MSX International, Inc. and will be retained by MSX International,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
EXHIBIT 23.2



[LETTERHEAD OF MILLER AND LENTS, LTD. APPEARS HERE]



March 1, 2007



Cross Timbers Royalty Trust

P.O. Box 830650

Dallas, TX 75283-0650



| | Re: | Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
| | --- | ---------------------------

2006 Annual
Report on Form 10-K



Gentlemen:



The firm of Miller and Lents, Ltd., consents to the references to our firm
in the form and context in which they appear and to the use of our report dated February 20, 2007, regarding the Cross Timbers Royalty Trust Proved Reserves and Future Net Revenue as of December 31, 2006, in the 2006 Annual
Report on Form 10-K. We further consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-91460 and 33-55784 on Form S-8 of XTO Energy Inc.



Miller and Lents, Ltd., has no interests in the Cross Timbers Royalty Trust or in any affiliated companies or subsidiaries and is not to receive any
such interest as payment for such reports and has no director, officer, or employee otherwise connected with Cross Timbers Royalty Trust. We are not employed by Cross Timbers Royalty Trust on a contingent basis.



Yours very truly,MILLER AND LENTS, LTD.By

/s/ JAMES PEARSONJames Pearson Chairman
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the report of SpatiaLight, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Officer
of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                          /s/ ROBERT A. OLINS
                                          Robert A. Olins
                                          Chief Executive Officer, Principal
                                          Financial and Accounting Officer

March 14, 2005
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-20-00301-CV

Estate of C.E. Erwin, deceased

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 2 of Victoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2-12,174-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed in part and reversed 

in part, and the case should be remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the 

judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED IN PART and REVERSED IN PART, and the 

case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Costs of the 

appeal are adjudged against appellee.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

December 29, 2021
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7107

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CARL ROBERT CHRISTY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District

Judge. (CR-89-9-F, CA-96-741-5-F)

Submitted: May 19, 1998 Decided: June 22, 1998

Before ERVIN and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carl Robert Christy, Appellant Pro Se. Robert John Erickson,

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Carl Robert Christy seeks to appeal the district court’s

orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994

& Supp. 1998), and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court and deny Appellant’s motion to appoint counsel. United States

v. Christy, Nos. CR-89-9-F; CA-96-741-5-F (E.D.N.C. June 16, 1997;

July 15, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document

Exhibit 10.2
December 14, 2022




Hamilton E. James 
Chairman of the Board 
Costco Wholesale Corporation 




RE: Executive Employment Agreement 




Dear Tony: 


As provided for under section 7(b) of the Executive Employment Agreement, effective January 1, 2017, between Costco Wholesale Corporation and me, this letter will confirm an extension of the term through and including December 31, 2023. Consistent with the prior decisions of the Compensation Committee: section 1(a) is amended to change the Annual Base Salary to $1,150,000; and section 1(h) is amended to change the Target Bonus to $600,000. The reference in the first "whereas" clause to my serving as President shall be deemed omitted. Please countersign below to indicate acceptance on behalf of  the Company. 




Very truly yours, 


			
	By: /s/ W. Craig Jelinek
	W. Craig Jelinek
	Chief Executive Officer
	
	
	Costco Wholesale Corporation 
	By: /s/ Hamilton James
	Hamilton E. James
	Chairman of the Board
	






cc: John Stanton
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3706 

To provide for the application of certain provisions of the Secure Rural 

Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 for fiscal year 2021. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 17, 2022 

Mr. CRAPO (for himself, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. RISCH, Mr. MERKLEY, Mr. 

MANCHIN, and Mr. WICKER) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed 

A BILL 

To provide for the application of certain provisions of the 

Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination 

Act of 2000 for fiscal year 2021. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COUNTY ELECTIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021 

4 UNDER THE SECURE RURAL SCHOOLS AND 

5 COMMUNITY SELF-DETERMINATION ACT OF 

6 2000. 

7 Sections 102(b)(1)(D), 102(d)(1)(F), and 

8 102(d)(3)(D) of the Secure Rural Schools and Community 

9 Self-Determination Act of 2000 (16 U.S.C. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3706 CPS

1 7112(b)(1)(D), 7112(d)(1)(F), 7112(d)(3)(D)) shall be 

2 applied for fiscal year 2021. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### William G. Jones, Appellant, v. Ward N. Wakefield, Respondent.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and with leave to defendant to renew application on additional proofs.

Opinion

*Per Curiam.*
1

The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Arthur J.

Boylan, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 01-2997

___________

Andre Tony Walls, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Deanna Hiller; Michael R. Isaacson, * District of Minnesota.

Sued as Michael Isaacson; Bureau of *

Prisons, Sued as Federal Bureau of * [UNPUBLISHED]

Prisons, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: February 19, 2002

 Filed: February 22, 2002

___________

Before LOKEN, BEAM, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Federal inmate Andre Walls appeals the district court’s1

 adverse grant of

summary judgment in his lawsuit against the Bureau of Prisons and two of its
-2-

officials. For the reasons stated in the magistrate judge’s report, we affirm. See 8th

Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 4 (Friday, January 6, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 2175]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-425]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Agency Meeting

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: [To be published]

STATUS: Closed meeting.

PLACE: 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.

DATE PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED: To be published.

CHANGE IN THE MEETING: Additional item.
    The following additional item will be considered at a closed 
meeting scheduled for Thursday, January 5, 1995, at 2:30 p.m.
    Settlement of injunctive action.
    Commissioner Roberts, as duty officer, determined that Commission 
business required the above change and that no earlier notice thereof 
was possible.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact: The Office of the Secretary, (202) 942-7070.

    Dated: January 4, 1995.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-425 Filed 1-4-95; 2:41 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M