alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Nittany  Financial  Corp.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  we, David
Z. Richards, President, and Gary M. Bradley, Vice President and Chief Accounting
Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/ David Z. Richards                /s/ Gary M. Bradley
---------------------------          -------------------
David Z. Richards                    Gary M. Bradley
President                            Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer



May 13, 2004




A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Nittany  Financial  Corp. and will be retained by Nittany  Financial
Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon
request
#### STATE v. JARVIS MILLS.

(Filed 9 November, 1960.)

Criminal Law § 118: Intoxicating Liquor § 16—

Where the warrant charges unlawful transportation and possession of nontaxpaid whiskey for the purpose of sale, a verdict of guilty of transporting nontaxpaid whiskey supports judgment and sentence, since the verdict spells out an offense contained in the warrant, it being permissible to treat the words “for the.purpose of sale” as surplusage.

Appeal by defendant from *Johnston, J.,*May 9, 1960 Criminal Term, of Wake.

Criminal prosecution on warrant charging that defendant on March 14, 1960, “did unlawfully and wilfully transport and have in his possession a quantity of whiskey on which the tax imposed by the U. S. Government had not been paid, to wit: % gallon, for the purpose of sale,” against the form of the statute, etc.

Upon trial *de novo*in superior court, on appeal by defendant from conviction and judgment in the Recorder’s Court of Garner, the jury returned a verdict of “guilty of Transporting Non-Tax Paid Whiskey.” From judgment, imposing a prison sentence, defendant appealed.

*Attorney General Bruton and Assistant Attorney General Me-Galliard for the State.*

*W. H. Yarborough for defendant, appellant.*

PER CcraiAM.

The record contains no case' oh appeal. Neither the *336evidence nor the judge’s charge is before us. It is stated that defendant excepted to the denial of his motion of nonsuit and to the judgment. These exceptions are not numbered. There are no assignments of error.

In this Court defendant moved in arrest of judgment for that (1) the warrant upon which he was tried is fatally defective, and (2) the verdict is not sufficient to support the judgment.

The warrant sufficiently charges all elements of the criminal offense of which defendant was convicted, namely, the unlawful transportation of nontaxpaid whiskey. It seems probable that the trial judge treated the words, “for the purpose of sale,” as surplusage and submitted the case only in relation to the transportation charge.

Unlike *S. v. Lassiter,*208 N.C. 251, 179 S.E. 891, cited by defendant, the jury spelled out its verdict in words sufficient to show it found defendant guilty of the transportation charge contained in the warrant. Perhaps the trial judge, advertent to surplus allegations in the warrant, instructed the jury, if they found the defendant guilty of the transportation charge, to render their verdict in the words they used.

The fragmentary record before us discloses no ground for disturbing the verdict and judgment.

No error.
EXHIBIT 31.2 -- CERTIFICATION

         I, Alan Rubin, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Alec Bradley Cigar
Corporation;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

                  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
         caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this report is being prepared;

                  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
         controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
         about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
         of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
         evaluation; and

                  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
         internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
         registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal
         quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,
         or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting; and

         5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditor and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

                  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
         the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
         which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's
         ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
         and

                  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
         management or other employees who have a significant role in the
         registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 13, 2005

/s/ Alan Rubin
--------------
Alan Rubin
Principal Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 38 (Monday, February 27, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 10533]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4540]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[TN 110-1-6172b; FRL-5144-1]


Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans Tennessee: 
Approval of Revisions to the Tennessee Chapter on Volatile Organic 
Compounds (VOC)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA proposes to approve the State Implementation Plan 
(SIP) revisions submitted by the State of Tennessee for the purpose of 
establishing regulations for the control of Volatile Organic Compounds 
(VOC) which meet the requirements of section 182(b)(2) of the 1990 
amendments to the Clean Air Act (CAA). In the final rules section of 
this Federal Register, the EPA is approving the State's SIP revision as 
a direct final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views 
this as a noncontroversial revision amendment and anticipates no 
adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in 
the direct final rule. If no adverse comments are received in response 
to that direct final rule, no further activity is contemplated in 
relation to this proposed rule. If EPA receives adverse comments, the 
direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received 
will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed 
rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this 
document. Any parties interested in commenting on this document should 
do so at this time.

DATES: To be considered, comments must be received by March 29, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be addressed to William Denman at 
the Region 4 address below. Copies of the material submitted by the 
State of Tennessee may be examined during normal business hours at the 
following locations:

Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4 Air Programs Branch, 345 
Courtland Street NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30365.
Division of Air Pollution Control, Tennessee Department of Environment 
and Conservation, L & C Annex, 9th Floor, 401 Church Street, Nashville, 
Tennessee 37243-1531.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Denman, Stationary Source 
Planning Unit, Regulatory Planning and Development Section, Air 
Programs Branch, Air, Pesticides & Toxics Management Division, 
Environmental Protection Agency Region 4, 345 Courtland Street, NE, 
Atlanta, Georgia 30365. The telephone number is (404) 347-3555 
extension 4208. Reference file TN110-01-6172.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information see the direct 
final rule which is published in the rules section of this Federal 
Register.

    Dated: January 9, 1995.
Patrick M. Tobin,
Acting Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 95-4540 Filed 2-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
## Summary of Provisions That Would Change             the Social Security Program

- Office of the Chief Actuary
- Individual Provisions

### **Description of Proposed Provisions:                 Cost-of-Living Adjustment**

Printer-friendly Version
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-2012-N-0114]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “Request for Samples and Protocols” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        FDA PRA Staff, Office of Operations, Food and Drug Administration, 8455 Colesville Rd., COLE-14526, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,                         *PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On September 24, 2015, the Agency submitted a proposed collection of information entitled “Request for Samples and Protocols” to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0206. The approval expires on December 31, 2018. A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at                     *http://www.reginfo.gov/​public/​do/​PRAMain.*

Dated: February 8, 2016.

Leslie Kux,

Associate Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 2016-02882 Filed 2-11-16; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

SURESH PACKIRISAMY,

P etitioner
v.

BANUPRIYA SURESH,

Respondent :
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
: No. 673 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 25th day of May, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3886 

To amend the Commodity Exchange Act to prohibit trading of water and 

water rights for future delivery, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 21, 2022 

Ms. WARREN (for herself, Mr. MERKLEY, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. MARKEY, 

and Mr. SANDERS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Commodity Exchange Act to prohibit trading 

of water and water rights for future delivery, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Future of Water Act 

5 of 2022’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3886 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF TRADING IN WATER AND WATER 

2 RIGHTS FOR FUTURE DELIVERY. 

3 (a) COMMODITY EXCHANGE ACT.—Section 1a(9) of 

4 the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1a(9)) is amend5 ed— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘(7 U.S.C. 13–1)) and’’ and in7 serting ‘‘(7 U.S.C. 13–1)),’’; 

8 (2) by inserting ‘‘water or water rights (or any 

9 index, measure, value, or data related to water or 

10 water rights), and’’ after ‘‘receipts), and’’; and 

11 (3) by striking ‘‘receipts) in which’’ and insert12 ing ‘‘receipts, and water or water rights, or any 

13 index, measure, value, or data related to water or 

14 water rights) in which’’. 

15 (b) PUBLIC LAW 85–839.—The first section of Pub16 lic Law 85–839 (7 U.S.C. 13–1) is amended in the first 

17 sentence of subsection (a)— 

18 (1) by inserting ‘‘water or water rights (or any 

19 index, measure, value, or data related to water or 

20 water rights),’’ after ‘‘sale of’’; and 

21 (2) by striking ‘‘receipts)’’ and inserting ‘‘re22 ceipts),’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 24, 2017

t0117

Order 

Clerk

January 24, 2017

153828

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 153828

COA: 324018 

Wayne CC: 14-000152-FC

THEODORE PAUL WAFER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 5, 2016 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral 

argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1). 

The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order 

addressing whether the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s request for a jury instruction 

on the rebuttable presumption at MCL 780.951(1) of the self-defense act violated the 

defendant’s rights to present a defense and to a properly instructed jury. The parties 

should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 36 (Thursday, February 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 10111]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4360]



[[Page 10111]]

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Information Collections Under Review

    The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has been sent the 
following collection(s) of information proposals for review under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 USC Chapter 35) and the 
Paperwork Reduction Reauthorization Act since the last list was 
published. Entries are grouped into submission categories, with each 
entry containing the following information:
    (1) The title of the form/collection;
    (2) The agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of 
the Department sponsoring the collection.
    (3) Who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief 
abstract;
    (4) An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount 
of time estimated for an average respondent to respond;
    (5) An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated 
with the collection; and,
    (6) An indication as to whether Section 3504(h) of Public Law 96-
511 applies.
    Comments and/or suggestions regarding the item(s) contained in this 
notice, especially regarding the estimated public burden and associated 
response time, should be directed to the OMB reviewer, Mr. Jeff Hill on 
(202) 395-7340 and to the Department of Justice's Clearance Officer, 
Mr. Robert B. Briggs, on (202) 514-4319. If you anticipate commenting 
on a form/collection, but find that time to prepare such comments will 
prevent you from prompt submission, you should notify the OMB reviewer 
and the Department of Justice Clearance Officer of your intent as soon 
as possible. Written comments regarding the burden estimate or any 
other aspect of the collection may be submitted to Office of 
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 
Washington, DC 20503, and to Mr. Robert B. Briggs, Department of 
Justice Clearance Officer, Systems Policy Staff/Information Resources 
Management/Justice Management Division Suite 850, WCTR, Washington, DC 
20530.

New Collection

    (1) Audit of the National Drug Intelligence Center.
    (2) None. Office of Inspector General, United States Department of 
Justice.
    (3) Primary = Federal Government, Other = State, Local or Tribal 
Government. Information is requested in other to determine: 1. 
Customers satisfaction with NDIC reports, and 2. Customers opinions of 
the quality of NDIC reports. The results of the survey will be a factor 
in the auditors' assessment of the efficiency and effectiveness of 
NDIC.
    (4) 290 annual respondents but it is projected that only 58 will 
respond at .5 hours per response.
    (5) 29 annual burden hours.
    (6) Not applicable under Section 3504(h) of Public Law 96-511.
    Public comment on this item is encouraged.

    Dated: February 16, 1995.
Robert B. Briggs,
Department Clearance Officer, Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 95-4360 Filed 2-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Frederick K. Minturn, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MSX International, Inc.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b)  (reserved)  c)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisquarterly report based on such evaluation; and  d)  disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: May 18, 2005
/s/Frederick K. Minturn