alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

Calendar No. 239 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3459 

To prohibit a Federal agency from promulgating any rule or guidance that 

bans hydraulic fracturing in the United States, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 10, 2022 

Mr. CRAMER introduced the following bill; which was read the first time 

JANUARY 18, 2022 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

A BILL 

To prohibit a Federal agency from promulgating any rule 

or guidance that bans hydraulic fracturing in the United 

States, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3459 PCS

1 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON PROMULGATING ANY RULE 

2 OR GUIDANCE THAT BANS HYDRAULIC FRAC3 TURING IN THE UNITED STATES. 

4 (a) DEFINITION OF HYDRAULIC FRACTURING.—In 

5 this section, the term ‘‘hydraulic fracturing’’ means a 

6 process that— 

7 (1) stimulates or increases the production and 

8 ultimate recovery of oil or natural gas from a well 

9 by pumping a fluid and a proppant (such as sand 

10 or similar material) at high pressure into a well to 

11 create fractures in the reservoir that the proppant 

12 holds open; and 

13 (2) increases the surface of the formation avail14 able for oil and natural gas to flow into the wellbore. 

15 (b) PROHIBITION.—No Federal agency may propose, 

16 implement, or finalize a rule or guidance that bans hy17 draulic fracturing in the United States. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 239 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3459 

A BILL 

To prohibit a Federal agency from promulgating 

poses. turing in the United States, and for other purany rule or guidance that bans hydraulic fracJANUARY 18, 2022 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 29 (Monday, February 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 8251]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3516]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION

[Finance Docket No. 32425]


Chicago SouthShore & South Bend Railroad--Operation Exemption--
Illinois International Port District

    Chicago SouthShore & South Bend Railroad (CSS) filed a notice of 
exemption to provide nonexclusive switching service over 8.7 miles of 
yard and switching track entirely within the Illinois International 
Port District. The track generally is located north of 130th Street and 
east of Doty Avenue on the west bank of Lake Calumet in Chicago, IL. 
The exemption was to become effective on or about October 20, 1994.
    Any comments must be filed with the Commission and served on: Jo A. 
DeRoche, Weiner, Brodsky, Sidman & Kider, P.C., 1350 New York Avenue, 
N.W., Suite 800, Washington, D.C. 20005-4797.
    This notice is filed under 49 CFR 1150.31. If the notice contains 
false or misleading information, the exemption is void ab initio. 
Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10505(d) may be filed 
at any time.<SUP>1 The filing of a petition to revoke will not 
automatically stay the transaction.

    \1\ Simultaneously with the filing of the notice of exemption, 
CSS filed a petition to dismiss; and, on October 20, 1994, it 
submitted exhibits inadvertently omitted from its petition. The 
Railway Labor Executives' Association and United Transportation 
Union, respectively, filed comments on October 24 and November 3, 
1994. Chicago Rail Link (CRL), on November 3, 1994, petitioned to 
revoke the exemption and replied to CSS's petition to dismiss. 
Patrick W. Simmons, Illinois Legislative Board Director, United 
Transportation Union (Simmons), on November 9, 1994, petitioned to 
reject or revoke the exemption and replied to the petition to 
dismiss. CSS, on November 22, 1994, withdrew its petition to dismiss 
the exemption and submitted a copy of a CRL letter withdrawing the 
latter's petition to revoke. Thereafter, on November 29, 1994, CSS 
replied to Simmons' petition to reject or revoke and reply to CSS's 
petition to dismiss. Simmons' petition was considered as an appeal 
in a separate decision, and that decision is being served 
simultaneously with this notice of exemption.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Decided: February 1, 1995.

    By the Commission, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-3516 Filed 2-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7035-01-P
EX-23.1
               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

        We  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statements on Forms S-3 and S-8 of our reports  dated April 13, 1998,  April 15,
1998 and June 18, 1998 with respect to the consolidated  financial statements of
Genta Incorporated included in the Genta Incorporated Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year  ended  December  31,  1997 and  Amendments  Nos.  1 and 3 thereto,
respectively  (collectively,  the "Genta  1997 Annual  Report")  and our reports
dated April 13, 1998 and June 18, 1998 with respect to the financial  statements
of Genta Jago Technologies B.V., included in the Genta 1997 Annual Report.


                                            /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


San Diego, California
June 18, 1998
Exhibit 4.1


 


DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE


 


	$25,000.00	Sarasota, FL
	 	December 13, 2022


 


For value received, and intending to be legally bound,
INVO Bioscience Inc. (the “Maker”), promises to pay the total sum of twenty five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) to STEVE
SHUM (the “Holder”) together with a financing fee (the “Fee”) of ten percent (10%). Should this
demand promissory note (this “Note”) not be repaid in full by January 31, 2023, interest shall accrue on the Note from
the date hereof until paid, at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum (computed on the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months).
Principal, the Fee and any interest due shall be paid in full on demand, following ten (10) calendar day prior written notice, which may
be given by Holder starting on January 13, 2022. Payments shall be applied first to any accrued interest and then to the financing fee
and shall be made at such place as the Holder may direct.


 


This Note may be prepaid in whole or in part at any
time without penalty, premium or other consideration.


 


All presentment notice of protest or notice of nonpayment
or dishonor are hereby waived, and the failure of the Holder to exercise any of his rights hereunder in any instance shall not constitute
a waiver thereof in that or any other instance.


 


Notwithstanding anything stated to the contrary herein,
this Note shall become immediately due and payable, without any demand or notice whatsoever, upon the commencement of any bankruptcy,
reorganization, receivership or insolvency proceeding by or against the Maker, or upon the Maker making any assignment for the benefit
of creditors.


 


In the event that this Note, together with all accrued
but unpaid interest hereon, is not paid within ten (10) days after the date upon which payment becomes due pursuant to the terms of this
Note, then the Maker agrees to pay all reasonable attorney’s fees and expenses incurred by the Holder in enforcing the obligations
of the Maker under this Note.


 


This Note may not be modified, amended, waived, extended,
changed, discharged or terminated orally or by any act or failure to act on the part of the Maker or the Holder, but only by an agreement
in writing signed by both the Maker and the Holder.


 


This note shall be construed in accordance with the
laws of the State of New York, without regard to those provisions related to choice of law.


 


[Signature follows on next page]


 






    	-1-



     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Maker has executed
and delivered this instrument effective as of the date first written above.


 


	By Maker:	 	Reviewed and Approved By:
	 	 	 
	/s/ Andrea Goren	 	/s/ Matthew Szot
	Andrea Goren	 	Matthew Szot
	Chief Financial Officer	 	Chairman, Audit Committee
	INVO Bioscience Inc.	 	INVO Bioscience Inc.


 






    	-2-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001058870
<NAME> THE RESORT AT SUMMERLIN, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      62,905,831
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  300,728
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            70,789,939
<PP&E>                                     208,035,658
<DEPRECIATION>                                 529,310
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             296,375,780
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       26,026,987
<BONDS>                                    207,341,055
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    74,067,691
<OTHER-SE>                                (28,614,575)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               296,375,780
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,608,924
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,983,719
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,286,636)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,286,636)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                 (10,610,858)
<NET-INCOME>                              (15,897,494)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

________________ NO. 09
- 16
- 00 466
- CV

________________ IN RE BRANDON BRADLEY

__________________________________________________________________ Original Proceeding 317th District Court of Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause C
- 188,770

__________________________________________________________________ ORDER Relator Brandon Bradley filed an application for writ of habeas corpus. Bradley alleges that his confinement pursuant to the Judgment of Contempt and the Commitment Order signed by the Judge of the 317th District Court in Jefferson County, in Cause No. C

- 188,770, is illegal because the relator has not receive d the time credit to which he is entitled. We may order the relato r’s discharge pending the resolution of the merits of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(b)(3). It is, therefore, ORDERED that the relator, Brandon Bradley, is hereby admitted to bail upon his giving a good and sufficient bon d, conditioned as2 required by law, in the sum of Three Hundred Dollars ($300.00), to be approved by the Sheriff of Jefferson County, Texas. A copy of the approved and executed bond shall be forwarded to the Clerk of this Court. ORDER ENTERED December 21 , 2016.
PER CURIAM Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.
| Subsidiary                   |   | Jurisdiction        |
|------------------------------|--------|---------------------|
|                         |   |                |
| CoaLogix      Inc.           |   | Delaware            |
|                         |   |                |
| CoaLogix      Tech Inc.      |   | Delaware            |
|                         |   |                |
| CoaLogix      Solutions Inc. |   | Delaware            |
|                         |   |                |
| SCR-Tech,      LLC           |   | North      Carolina |
|                         |   |                |
| DSIT      Solutions Ltd.     |   | Israel              |
|                         |   |                |
| Coreworx      Inc.           |   | Ontario             |

----
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable) | Description of Proposed Provision:      Beginning in 2010, make all earnings subject to the payroll tax and credit them for benefit purposes. |
|-------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                           |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2009 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified August 31, 2009 |
#### ELIAHOU LEVY v. EZRA MEIR.

(Filed 30 April, 1958.)

Headings § 4—

Whether the complaint should be verified is optional with plaintiff unless some statute requires verification as a condition to the maintenance of the action, G.S. 1-144, and in an action on a promissory note verification is not required, and therefore an attempted verification, which is a -nullity, cannot defeat the action, although in such instance defendant is not required to verify his answer. G.S. 1-146.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Sink, E. J.,*October 1957 Civil Term (Second) of Wake.

Plaintiff seeks to recover the dollar equivalent of 450 dinars, the sum specified in a promissory note given by defendant to plaintiff in Bagdad in August 1947. Attached to the complaint is an affidavit by Kenneth M. Stark as attorney in fact for plaintiff. This affidavit is in the form prescribed for a party to the action who desires to verify ■the same, G.S. 1-145; but does not meet the requirements of a verification by an agent or attorney, G.S. 1-146.

*329Defendant moved to dismiss the action for lack of proper verification. The original complaint alleged that plaintiff was a resident of New York County, State of New York.'Plaintiff was allowed to amend to allege that he was a resident of Israel. The court, after hearing the parties on the motion to dismiss, adjudged that the complaint had been improperly verified and thereupon dismissed the action at plaintiff's cost. Plaintiff appealed.

*Everett Everett & Everett for 'plaintiff, appellant.*

*Emanuel*<fe *Emanuel for defendant, appellee.*

Per Curiam.

A pleading must be subscribed by a party or his attorney. The complaint filed in this case meets this statutory requirement. Whether plaintiff verifies his complaint is optional with him unless some statute requires verification as a condition to the maintenance of the action. G.S. 1-144. No statute requires verification to maintain an action on a promissory note. Since plaintiff can maintain his action without verifying the complaint, an attempted verification, which is a nullity, cannot defeat that right. *Reynolds v. Smathers, 87*N.C. 24; *McNair v. Yarboro,*186 N.C. 111. As the verification does not meet the requirement of the statute, G.S. 1-146, defendant is not required to verify his answer.

Reversed.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 37 (Friday, February 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 10395]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4551]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Agency for Health Care Policy and Research


Filing of Annual Reports of Federal Advisory Committees

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to Section 13 of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. 2), the Annual Reports prepared 
for the public by the committees set forth below have been filed with 
the Library of Congress:

Health Care Policy and Research Special Emphasis Panel
Health Care Technology Study Section
Health Services Research and Developmental Grants Review Committee
Health Services Research Dissemination Study Section
National Advisory Council for Health Care Policy, Research and 
Evaluation

    Copies of these reports, prepared in accordance with Section 10(d) 
of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, are available to the public for 
inspection at: (1) The Library of Congress, Special Forms Reading Room, 
Main Building, on weekdays between 9 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.; and (2) the 
Information Resource Center, Agency for Health Care Policy and 
Research, Suite 501, 2101 East Jefferson Street, Rockville, Maryland, 
on weekdays between 9 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.
    Copies may be obtained from Mr. James E. Owens, Committee 
Management Officer, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Suite 
601, 2101 East Jefferson Street, Rockville, Maryland 20852.

    Dated: February 14, 1995.
Clifton R. Gaus,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 95-4551 Filed 2-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 28 (Thursday, February 11, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 7337]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02759]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL16-32-000]

Talen Energy Marketing, LLC; Notice of Institution of Section 206 
Proceeding and Refund Effective Date

    On February 5, 2016, the Commission issued an order in Docket No. 
EL16-32-000, pursuant to section 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 16 
U.S.C. 824e (2012), instituting an investigation into the justness and 
reasonableness of Talen Energy Marketing, LLC's informational filing 
pursuant to Schedule 2 to the PJM Interconnection, LLC's Open Access 
Transmission Tariff supporting the revenue requirement for reactive 
supply and voltage control service (Reactive Service) of Talen 
Ironwood, LLC. Talen Energy Marketing, LLC, 154 FERC ] 61,087 (2016).
    The refund effective date in Docket No. EL16-32-000, established 
pursuant to section 206(b) of the FPA, will be the date of publication 
of this notice in the Federal Register.

    Dated: February 5, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-02759 Filed 2-10-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
<PAGE>   1
                 CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 20-F)
of MERANT plc of our report dated 12 September 2000, included in the 2000 Annual
Report of Shareholders of MERANT plc.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-24867, 333-45701, 333-65027 and 333-92819) pertaining to the
employee share plans named on the facing sheets thereof of our report dated 12
September 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of MERANT
plc incorporated by reference in the Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year
ended April 30, 2000 in respect of the UK format financial statements.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of MERANT plc listed
in Item 19(a)2 - UK Format. This schedule is the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In
our opinion, the financial statements schedule referred to above, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.



Reading, England
October 24, 2000
EXHIBIT
32.1
    Certification
of CEO pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 I, Lisa
Y. Roskens, Chief Executive Officer of the general partner of the General
Partner of America First Tax Exempt Investors, L.P. (the “Company”), certify
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that:
 
 (1)
The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 
 
 Date:  May
11, 2009
 /s/ Lisa Y.
Roskens
 Lisa Y.
Roskens
 Chief
Executive Officer
 Burlington
Capital Group LLC, acting in its capacity as general partner of the General
Partner of America First Tax Exempt Investors, L.P.
 
 
 A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to America First Tax Exempt Investors, L.P. and will be retained by
America First Tax Exempt Investors, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.