Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 28 / Friday, February 10, 1995 / Notices 7951

waiver of the Commission’s notice

requirements. Copies of this filing were

served upon CILCO, CIPS, IP, I&M, IIGE,

NIPSCO and CECI, WEPCO, WP&L and

the Illinois Commerce Commission.

Comment date: February 17, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

21. Commonwealth Edison Co.

[Docket No. ER95–520–000]

Take notice that on January 31, 1995,

Commonwealth Edison Company

(ComEd), submitted an abbreviated rate

filing to amend ComEd’s rate for

coordination sales, as permitted by the

Commission’s ‘‘Policy Statement and

Interim Rule Regarding Ratemaking

Treatment of the Cost of Emission

Allowances in Coordination Rates.’’

Com Ed proposes to include the

incremental cost of sulfur dioxide

emission allowances in coordination

rates for those rates which already

provide for the recovery of other

variable costs on an incremental basis.

As contemplated by the Interim Rule,

ComEd requests an effective date of

January 1, 1995, and accordingly,

requests waiver of the Commission’s

notice requirements. ComEd agrees that

revenues collected with respect to

allowance-related charges, assessed

between January 1, 1995 and the date

the Commission issues an order

accepting this filing without

investigation or hearing, will be subject

to refund.

Copies of this filing were served upon

all of ComEd’s coordination sales

service customers and the Illinois

Commerce Commission.

Comment date: February 17, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

22. Delmarva Power & Light Co.

[Docket No. ER95–521–000]

Take notice that on January 31, 1995,

Delmarva Power & Light Company

(Delmarva), of Wilmington, Delaware,

filed under the provisions of Section

205 of the Federal Power Act an eight

year power supply contract (the Service

Agreement) under which Delmarva will

provide requirements service to the City

of Seaford, Delaware (Seaford).

Delmarva states that the Service

Agreement supersedes Delmarva’s Rate

Schedule No. 62 under which Seaford

currently receives service.

Delmarva, with Seaford’s

concurrence, requests an effective date

of February 1, 1995.

The Service Agreement provides for

the continuation of the requirements

service previously furnished Seaford

under Rate Schedule No. 62, but

changes certain terms and conditions.

The chief differences between the

Service Agreement and Rate Schedule

No. 62 are that the Service Agreement

establishes a new rate for Seaford which

is below the level of the rate currently

charged Seaford and provides for future

adjustments to the Seaford rate based on

changes in the level of Delmarva’s retail

rates. The Service Agreement has an

eight-year term.

Delmarva states that the filing has

been posted and has been served upon

the affected customer and the Delaware

Public Service Commission.

Comment date: February 17, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

23. Central Maine Power Co.

[Docket No. ER95–522–000]

Take notice that on January 31, 1995,

Central Maine Power Company (CMP),

tendered for filing an Amendment to

Second Amended Transmission Service

Agreement between CMP and Maine

Public Service Company, Inc., (MPS)

dated as of January 26, 1995 (the

Agreement). The amendment is

designed to allow MPS to wheel nonfirm energy to MPS from energy

suppliers south of the CMP transmission

system.

Comment date: February 17, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

24. Tex-La Electric Coop. of Texas, Inc.

[Docket No. TX94–4–000]

Take notice that on January 4, 1995,

Tex-La Electric Coop. of Texas, Inc.

tendered for filing an amendment in the

above-referenced docket.

Comment date: February 17, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

25. American Municipal Power-Ohio,

Inc. v. Ohio Edison Company

[Docket No. TX95–4–000]

On January 24, 1995, American

Municipal Power-Ohio, Inc. (AMPOhio), 601 Dempsey Road, P.O. Box

549, Westerville, Ohio, filed with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

an application requesting that the

Commission order Ohio Edison

Company to provide transmission

services pursuant to Section 211 of the

Federal Power Act.

Specifically, AMP-Ohio requests that

the Commission order Ohio Edison to

improve the reliability of the

transmission service it provides to

AMP-Ohio and its members—rendering

such service comparable with service

Ohio Edison provides to itself. AMPOhio requests that the Commission

order Ohio Edison (1) to establish

additional delivery points for certain

AMP-Ohio members, and (2) to modify

its filed tariff to permit the addition of

delivery points in the future upon

request.

Comment date: March 6, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, N.E.,

Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance

with Rules 211 and 214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR

385.214). All such motions or protests

should be filed on or before the

comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–3348 Filed 2–9–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Docket No. EL95–24–000, et al.]

Golden Spread Electric Cooperative

Inc., et al.; Electric Rate and Corporate

Regulation Filings

February 2, 1995.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Golden Spread Electric Cooperative,

Inc. v. Southwestern Public Service Co.

[Docket No. EL95–24–000]

Take notice that on January 25, 1995,

Golden Spread Electric Cooperative, Inc.

(Golden Spread) tendered for filing a

complaint alleging that Southwestern

Public Service Company (SPS), has

failed and is failing to properly calculate

credits to Golden Spread pursuant to a

Coordination Sales Benefit Credit Rider

that is part of SPS’ filed rate for

wholesale sales to Golden Spread.

Comment date: March 6, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

2. Potomac Edison Co.

[Docket No. ER95–39–001]

Take notice that on January 25, 1995,

Potomac Edison Company, tendered for
7952 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 28 / Friday, February 10, 1995 / Notices

filing its compliance filing in the abovereferenced docket.

Comment date: February 16, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

3. Public Service Company of New

Mexico

[Docket No. ER95–329–000]

Take notice that on January 24, 1995,

Public Service Company of New Mexico

tendered for filing an amendment in the

above-referenced docket.

Comment date: February 16, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

4. Baltimore Gas and Electric Co.

[Docket No. ER95–466–000]

Take notice that on January 23, 1995,

Baltimore Gas and Electric Company

(BGE), tendered for filing as an initial

rate schedule an agreement (Agreement)

between Public Service Electric and Gas

Company (PSE&G) and BGE. The

Agreement provides for the sale by BGE

of energy from its system (system

energy) to PSE&G on a daily, weekly, or

monthly basis (transaction). Each

transaction is fully interruptible. BGE

states that the timing of the transactions

cannot be accurately estimated but that

BGE will provide the system energy to

PSE&G at a negotiated rate upon which

the parties will agree prior to each

transaction when it is economical for

each party to do so. PSE&G will pay a

Reservation Charge to BGE for each

transaction in an amount equal to the

megawatthours of system energy

reserved for PSE&G by BGE during a

transaction multiplied by a Reservation

Charge Rate negotiated prior to each

transaction. The Reservation Charge

Rate will be subject to a cost justified

ceiling. PSE&G will pay an Energy

Charge for each transaction in an

amount equal to the megawatthours

delivered by BGE during such

transaction multiplied by an Energy

Charge Rate. The Energy Charge Rate

will be BGE’s estimated incremental

cost to supply the transaction, to be

charged for each hour of the transaction

in which BGE supplies energy.

Pursuant to § 35.11 of the

Commission’s regulations, BGE requests

that the Commission waive the prior

notice requirement and allow the

Agreement to become effective January

25, 1995. PSE&G has concurred with

this rate schedule by its execution of the

Agreement.

Comment date: February 16, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

5. Northeast Utilities Service Co.

[Docket No. ER95–467–000]

Take notice that on January 23, 1995,

Northeast Utilities Service Company

(NUSCO), tendered for filing a Service

Agreement with Louis Dreyfus Electric

Power Inc. (Dreyfus) under the NU

System Companies System Power Sales/

Exchange Tariff No. 6.

NUSCO states that a copy of this filing

has been mailed to Dreyfus.

NUSCO requests that the Service

Agreement become effective on January

16, 1995.

Comment date: February 16, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

6. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.

[Docket No. ER95–477–000]

Take notice that on January 26, 1995,

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation

(Niagara Mohawk), tendered for filing a

Service Agreement between Niagara

Mohawk and Gulfstream Energy, LLC

under Niagara Mohawk’s FERC Electric

Tariff Original Volume No. 2.

Comment date: February 16, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

7. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.

[Docket No. ER95–478–000]

Take notice that on January 26, 1995,

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation

(Niagara Mohawk), tendered for filing a

Service Agreement between Niagara

Mohawk and Electric Clearinghouse,

Inc. under Niagara Mohawk’s FERC

Electric Tariff Original Volume No. 2.

Comment date: February 16, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

8. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.

[Docket No. ER95–479–000]

Take notice that on January 26, 1995,

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation

(Niagara Mohawk), tendered for filing a

Service Agreement between Niagara

Mohawk and Coastal Electric Services

Company under Niagara Mohawk’s

FERC Electric Tariff Original Volume

No. 2.

Comment date: February 16, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

9. The Montana Power Co.

[Docket No. ER95–481–000]

Take notice that on January 26, 1995,

The Montana Power Company

(Montana), tendered for filing with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

pursuant to 18 CFR 35.13, a Form of

Service Agreement with Associated

Power Services, Inc. (APSI) under FERC

Electric Tariff, Second Revised Volume

No. 1 (M–1 Tariff), as well as a revised

Index of Purchasers under said Tariff

and a Certificate of Concurrence from

APSI.

A copy of the filing was served upon

APSI.

Comment date: February 16, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

10. Wisconsin Power and Light Co.

[Docket No. ER95–482–000]

Take notice that on January 26, 1995,

Wisconsin Power and Light Company

(WP&L), tendered for filing an

Agreement dated December 28, 1994,

establishing MidCon Power Services

Corp. as a customer under the terms of

WP&L’s Transmission Tariff T–2.

WP&L requests an effective date of

December 28, 1994, and accordingly

seeks waiver of the Commission’s notice

requirements. A copy of this filing has

been served upon the Public Service

Commission of Wisconsin.

Comment date: February 16, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

11. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.

[Docket No. ER95–483–000]

Take notice that on January 26, 1995,

New York State Electric & Gas

Corporation (NYSEG), tendered for

filing pursuant to § 35.12, as an initial

rate schedule, an agreement with Louis

Dreyfus Electric Power Inc. (LDEP). The

agreement provides a mechanism

pursuant to which the parties can enter

into separately scheduled transactions

under which NYSEG will sell to LDEP

and LDEP will purchase form NYSEG

either capacity and associated energy or

energy only as the parties may mutually

agree.

NYSEG requests that the agreement

become effective on January 27, 1995, so

that the parties may, if mutually

agreeable, enter into separately

scheduled transactions under the

agreement. NYSEG has requested waiver

of the notice requirements for good

cause shown.

NYSEG served copies of the filing

upon the New York State Public Service

Commission and LDEP.

Comment date: February 16, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

12. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.

[Docket No. ER95–484–000]

Take notice that on January 27, 1995,

Pennsylvania Power & Light Company

(PP&L), tendered for filing with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

an Electrical Output Sales Agreement

(Agreement) between PP&L and PECO
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 28 / Friday, February 10, 1995 / Notices 7953

Energy Company (PECO) dated January

10, 1995. The Agreement provides for

the sale by PP&L to PECO of electrical

output solely for PECO’s use in

wholesale bulk power transactions.

PP&L has requested an effective date

of January 28, 1995 for the Agreement.

In accordance with 18 CFR 35.11, PP&L

has requested waiver of the sixty day

notice period in 18 CFR 35.2(e).

PP&L states that a copy of its filing

was provided to PECO and to the

Pennsylvania Public Utility

Commission.

Comment date: February 16, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

13. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.

[Docket No. ER95–485–000]

Take notice that on January 27, 1995,

Pennsylvania Power & Light Company

(PP&L), tendered for filing with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

an Electrical Output Sales Agreement

(Agreement) between PP&L and Catex

Vitol Electric Inc. (Catex), dated January

25, 1995. The Agreement provides for

the sale by PP&L to Catex of electrical

output solely for Catex’s use in

wholesale bulk power transactions.

PP&L has requested an effective date

of January 28, 1995 for the Agreement.

In accordance with 18 CFR 35.11, PP&L

has requested waiver of the sixty day

notice period in 18 CFR 35.2(e).

PP&L states that a copy of its filing

was provided to Catex and to the

Pennsylvania Public Utility

Commission.

Comment date: February 16, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

14. Union Electric Co.

[Docket No. ER95–487–000]

Take notice that on January 27, 1995,

Union Electric Company tendered for

filing an Interchange Agreement dated

June 10, 1994, between the United

States of America, as represented by the

Administrator, Southwestern Power

Administration (SPA) and Union

Electric Company (UE). UE asserts that

the agreement provides for the exchange

of power and energy between the

parties.

Comment date: February 16, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

15. Consolidated Edison Company of

New York, Inc.

[Docket No. ER95–488–000]

Take notice that on January 27, 1995,

Consolidated Edison Company of New

York, Inc. (‘‘Con Edison’’), tendered for

filing an agreement with CNG Energy

Services Corporation Agent and

Attorney in Fact for R.J. Dahnke and

Associates (‘‘CNG’’), to provide for the

sale of energy and capacity. For energy

sold by Con Edison the ceiling rate is

100 percent of the incremental energy

cost plus up to 10 percent of the SIC

(where such 10 percent is limited to 1

mill per Kwhr when the SIC in the hour

reflects a purchased power resource).

The ceiling rate for capacity sold by Con

Edison is $7.70 per megawatt hour. For

energy and capacity sold by CNG the

rates will be market based.

Con Edison states that a copy of this

filing has been served by overnight

delivery upon CNG.

Comment date: February 16, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

16. Consolidated Edison Company of

New York, Inc.

[Docket No. ER95–489–000]

Take notice that on January 27, 1995,

Consolidated Edison Company of New

York, Inc. (‘‘Con Edison’’), tendered for

filing an agreement with Louis Dreyfus

Electric Power, Inc. (‘‘LDEP’’), to

provide for the sale of energy and

capacity. For energy sold by Con Edison

the ceiling rate is 100 percent of the

incremental energy cost plus up to 10

percent of the SIC (where such 10

percent is limited to 1 mill per Kwhr

when the SIC in the hour reflects a

purchased power resource). The ceiling

rate for capacity sold by Con Edison is

$7.70 per megawatt hour. For energy

and capacity sold by LDEP the rates will

be market based.

Con Edison states that a copy of this

filing has been served by overnight

delivery upon LDEP.

Comment date: February 16, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

17. Iowa-Illinois Gas and Electric Co.

[Docket No. ER95–490–000]

Take notice that on January 30, 1995,

Iowa-Illinois Gas and Electric Company

(Iowa-Illinois), 206 East Second Street,

P.O. Box 4350, Davenport, Iowa 52808,

tendered for filing pursuant to § 205 of

the Federal Power Act and §§ 2.25,

35.13 and 35.23 of the Commission’s

Rules and Regulations, an abbreviated

filing consisting of a rate schedule

change to provide a mechanism to

recover the incremental costs of

emissions allowances in coordination

rates as authorized by the Commission’s

Policy Statement and Interim Rule

issued on December 15, 1994 in Docket

No. PL95–1–000.

Iowa-Illinois states that this rate

schedule change applies to various

coordination agreements entered into by

Iowa-Illinois with Commonwealth

Edison Company, Illinois Power

Company, Union Electric Company,

City of Genesseo (Illinois), Illinois

Municipal Electric Agency, Wisconsin

Power & Light Company, Waverly

Municipal Electric Utility, City of

Tipton (Iowa), City of Pella (Iowa),

Eldridge Electric and Water Utility

Board and the members of the MidContinent Area Power Pool.

Iowa-Illinois proposes to make the

rate schedule change effective on

January 1, 1995. Pursuant to the

Commission’s statements on page 33 of

the Policy Statement and Interim Rule

issued on December 15, 1994 in Docket

No. PL95–1–000, Iowa-Illinois requests

a waiver of the Commission’s 60-day

notice period required for the filing of

rate changes and, in return for the

Commission’s grant of such waiver,

Iowa-Illinois agrees that revenues

collected pursuant to the rate schedule

change based on assessments for the

period from January 1, 1995 through the

date on which the Commission issues

an order accepting the rate schedule

change shall be subject to refund.

Copies of the filing were served upon

the Iowa Utilities Board, the Illinois

Commerce Commission, Mid-Continent

Area Power Pool, Enerex,

Commonwealth Edison Company,

Illinois Power Company, Union Electric

Company, City of Genesseo (Illinois),

Illinois Municipal Electric Agency,

Wisconsin Power & Light Company,

Waverly Light and Power, City of Tipton

(Iowa), City of Pella (Iowa), City of

Eldridge (Iowa) and the members of the

Mid-Continent Area Power Pool.

Comment date: February 16, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street NE.,

Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance

with Rules 211 and 214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR

385.214). All such motions or protests

should be filed on or before the

comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the
7954 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 28 / Friday, February 10, 1995 / Notices

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–3349 Filed 2–9–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Docket Nos. CP93–258–000 et al.]

Mojave Pipeline Co.; Notice of

Availability of the Draft Environmental

Impact Statement for the Proposed

Mojave Northward Expansion Project

February 6, 1995.

The staffs of the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission (FERC) and

California State Lands Commission

(SLC) have prepared this draft

environmental impact report/

environmental impact statement (EIR/

EIS) on the natural gas pipeline facilities

proposed by Mojave Pipeline Operating

Company (Mojave) in the above dockets.

The draft EIR/EIS was prepared to

satisfy the requirements of the National

Environmental Policy Act and the

California Environmental Quality Act.

The staffs of the FERC and SLC believe,

subject to public comment, that

approval of the proposed project, with

appropriate mitigation measures and

receipt of necessary permits and

approvals, has the potential to

significantly impact the environment.

The draft EIR/EIS includes an

evaluation of the proposal.

The FERC and SLC staffs assessed the

potential environmental effects of the

construction and operation of the

proposed Mojave Northward Expansion

Project, which consists of between 660

and 681 miles of pipeline, depending on

final project configuration, including

the following facilities:

• A North Mainline about 290 miles

long from near Bakersfield northward to

Martinez.

• A Sacramento Mainline about 63

miles long from Ripon to southwest

Sacramento.

• Shorter segments, which may

include segments to Lindsay, Famoso,

Coalinga, Kingsburg, Sanger, Livingston,

Turlock, Ceres, Modesto, Tracy,

Oakland, Antioch, Fremont, McFarland,

Malaga, Madera, Fairmead, Ripon,

Lathrop, Hunters Point, and San

Francisco.

• A maximum of about 100 miles of

pipeline loops on the existing Mojave

Mainline, Mojave-Kern River East Side

Lateral, and Mojave-Kern River

Commonline.

• A total of 62,588 to 78,758

horsepower (hp) of compression at three

new compressor stations in California at

Amboy, Daggett, and either Famoso or

Lindsay plus the addition of 24,470 hp

of compression to Mojave’s existing

compressor station at Topock, Arizona.

• Either 55 or 58 new meter stations

depending on the final project

configuration.

The draft EIR/EIS has been placed in

the public files of the FERC and SLC

and is available for public inspection at

the following locations:

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

Division of Public Information, 941

North Capitol Street NE., Room 3104,

Washington, DC 20426, (202) 208–

1371

California State Lands Commission,

1807—13th Street, Sacramento, CA

95814, (916) 322–0530.

Copies have been mailed to Federal,

state, and local agencies, public interest

groups, interested individuals, public

libraries, newspapers, and parties to this

proceeding.

A limited number of copies of the

draft EIR/EIS are available from either of

the following individuals:

Mr. Michael Boyle, Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission,

Environmental Project Manager,

Office of Pipeline Regulation, Room

7312, 825 North Capitol Street NE.,

Washington, DC 20426, (202) 208–

0839

Ms. Mary Griggs, California State Lands

Commission, Environmental Project

Manager, 1807–13th Street,

Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 322–

0354.

Any person wishing to comment on

the draft EIR/EIS may do so. Written

comments must reference Docket Nos.

CP93–258–000 et al. Comments should

be addressed to: Office of the Secretary,

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street NE.,

Washington, DC 20426.

Comments should be filed as soon as

possible but must be received no later

than March 27, 1995, to ensure

consideration prior to a FERC and SLC

decision on this proposal. A copy of any

comments should also be sent to either

Mr. Michael Boyle, FERC

Environmental Project Manager, or Ms.

Mary Griggs, SLC Environmental Project

Manager at their respective addresses

given above.

Comments will be considered by the

FERC and SLC but will not serve to

make the commentor a party to the

proceeding. Any person seeking to

become a party to the proceeding must

file a motion to intervene pursuant to

Rule 214 of the FERC’s Rules of Practice

and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214).

In addition to asking for written

comments, we invite you to attend any

of the public meetings that will be held

at the times and locations listed below.

The meetings will be designed to

provide you with more detailed

information and another opportunity to

offer your comments on the draft EIR/

EIS. Those wanting to speak at the

meetings can call the FERC and SLC

Environmental Project Managers to

preregister their names on the speakers’

list. Those people on the speakers’ list

prior to the date of the meeting will be

allowed to speak first. Priority will be

given to people representing groups. A

transcript of each meeting will be made

so that your comments will be

accurately recorded.

Additional information about this

project is available from Mr. Michael

Boyle, FERC Environmental Review and

Compliance Branch I, Office of Pipeline

Regulation, at (202) 208–0839 on from

Ms. Mary Griggs, SLC, at (916) 322–

0354.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

Schedule for Draft EIR/EIS Public

Meetings

San Francisco, California, February 27,

1995; 3:00 pm to 7:00 pm

Earl P. Mills Community Center, 100

Whitney Young Circle, San

Francisco, California

Livermore, California, February 28,

1995; 7:00 pm

Junction Middle School, 298 Junction

Avenue, Livermore, California

Fresno, California, March 1, 1995; 7:00

pm

Holiday Inn—Fresno Airport, 5090 E.

Clinton Way @ Gateway, Fresno,

California

Barstow, California, March 2, 1995; 7:00

pm

Holiday Inn—Barstow, 1511 East

Main Street, Barstow, California.

[FR Doc. 95–3317 Filed 2–9–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Project Nos. 11181–002, et al.]

Hydroelectric Application [Energy

Storage Partners, et al.]; Notice of

Applications

Take notice that the following

hydroelectric applications have been

filed with the Commission and are

available for public inspection:

1 a. Type of Application: Major

License (Tendering Notice).

b. Project No.: 11181–002.

c. Date filed: November 28, 1994.

d. Applicant: Energy Storage Partners.

e. Name of Project: Lorella Pumped

Storage.

f. Location: On Bureau of Land

Management land, near the towns of