alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,575                   1,575
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,200                  27,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,015                   1,015
<INVENTORY>                                      7,314                   7,314
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,207                  37,207
<PP&E>                                          59,365                  59,365
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,290                   7,290
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 132,964                 132,964
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,504                  14,504
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,379                   1,379
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             8                       8
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,491                  32,491
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   132,964                 132,964
<SALES>                                         38,525                  66,545
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,525                  66,545
<CGS>                                           28,289                  48,943
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,258                  60,777
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   112                     112
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,746                   4,994
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    734                   1,173
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                      (4)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                734                   1,177
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (2,098)                 (2,098)
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,364)                   (921)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.29)                  (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.27)                  (0.20)
        


</TABLE>
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed and read this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Kolorfusion
International, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly Report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervisions,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this Quarterly Report is being prepared ;(b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this Quarterly Report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    disclosed in this Quarterly Report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and board of directors performing the equivalent functions of an
audit committee:
 (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
controls over financial reporting; and
 Date: May 22, 2006
    By:
    /s/ Stephen NagelPresident and Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 23.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-74418, 33-86108, 333-39653, 333-37163, 333-71539, 333-58016, 333-111477, 333-119125, 333-119126 and 333-145685) of American Superconductor Corporation of our report dated May 28,2009 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Boston, MA 

May 28, 2009
EXHIBIT 31.1



Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 / SEC Rule 13a14(a)



I, Frederick Cary, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Path 1 Network Technologies Inc.



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying
officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a. All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; and



b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: November 14, 2005



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|                                      
|/s/ Frederick Cary                    
|Frederick Cary                        
|Co-Interim Principal Executive Officer
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, **Floyd C. Wilson**,certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 10-Q of Petrohawk Energy Corporation (theCompany);

 

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on myknowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company asof, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               The Company’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Company and we have;

 

a.               Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

 

b.              Evaluated theeffectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report,based on our evaluation; and

 

c.               Disclosed in thisreport any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The Company’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and theaudit committee of Company’s board of directors:

 

a.               All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

b.              Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: May 12, 2005 |                                  |
|-------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                    | /s/**Floyd C. Wilson**                |   |
|                    | **Floyd C. Wilson**                   |
|                    | Chief Executive Officer and President |

 

----
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 1.02 1.30 28% 30%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

August 1, 2023

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Cost-of-Living Adjustment

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: A2. Starting December 2024, reduce the annual COLA by 0.5 percentage point.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8476

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee,

v. DARWIN LEWIS TURNER, a/k/a Abbey, Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L.Voorhees, District Judge. (5:06-cr-00001-RLV-DCK-2; 5:08-cv00133-RLV)

Submitted: March 12, 2009 Decided: March 18, 2009

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darwin Lewis Turner, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C.F. Shappert, United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: Darwin Lewis Turner seeks to appeal the district court’s order treating his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as a successive 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 2006 & Supp. 2008) motion, and dismissing it on that basis. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); Reid v. Angelone , 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);

Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Turner has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. Additionally, we construe Turner’s notice of appeal and informal brief as an application to file a second or successive motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. United States v. Winestock , 340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003). In order to

23 obtain authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims based on either: (1) a new rule of constitutional law, previously unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on collateral review; or (2) newly discovered evidence, not previously discoverable by due diligence, that would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of the offense. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(2), 2255. Turner’s claims do not satisfy either of these criteria. Therefore, we deny authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.
DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
I, Kenneth Y. Tanji, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Prudential Annuities Life Assurance Corporation (the Company), hereby certify that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 14, 2008



/s/ Kenneth Y. TanjiName:

Kenneth Y. TanjiTitle:

Chief Financial Officer and Director


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 23

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
PhyCor, Inc.


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
PhyCor, Inc. on Form S-3 (No. 33-98528), Form S-4 (Nos. 33-66210, 33-98530,
333-45017, and 333-45209) and Form S-8 (Nos. 33-65228 and 33-85726) of our
reports dated February 18, 1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
PhyCor, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related
consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1997, and all
related schedules, which reports appear in the December 31, 1997 annual report
on Form 10-K of PhyCor, Inc.


                                       /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP



Nashville, Tennessee
March 31, 1998
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9696-9697]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4173]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION

[Finance Docket No. 32653]


Blue Mountain Railroad, Inc.--Trackage Rights Exemption--
Burlington Northern Railroad Company

    Burlington Northern Railroad Company (BN) will agree to grant local 
and overhead trackage rights to Blue Mountain Railroad, Inc. (BMR) over 
approximately 0.7 miles of BN's rail line between BN milepost 75.8 and 
BN milepost 76.5 in Pullman, WA.\1\ The purpose of this transaction is 
to facilitate a bridge-widening project by the State of Washington. The 
trackage rights were to become effective on or after February 1, 1995.

    \1\BMR's local trackage rights will be limited to serving 
Washington State College located at BN milepost 76.21.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice is filed under 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(7). If the notice 
contains false or misleading information, the exemption is void ab 
initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10505(d) may 
be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke will not stay 
the transaction. Pleadings must be filed with the Commission and served 
on: Karl Morell, Suite 1035, 1101 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, 
DC 20004.
    As a condition to the use of this exemption, any employees 
adversely affected by the trackage rights will be protected under 
Norfolk and Western Ry. Co--Trackage Rights--BN, 354 I.C.C. 605 (1978), 
as modified in Mendocino Coast Ry., Inc.--Lease and Operate, 360 I.C.C. 
653 (1980).

    Decided: February 13, 1995.

    [[Page 9697]] By the Commission, David M. Konschnik, Director, 
Office of Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-4173 Filed 2-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7035-01-P
#### AMZI J. ELLINGTON, Trustee, v. D. D. ELLINGTON et al.

(Filed 29 March, 1933.)

Appeal by applicants for allowance from *Sinclair, J.,*at November Term, 1932, of "Wake.

Petition for partition, with prayer on the part of two of the respondents that executor and trustee be required to file true and correct account of his stewardship, as upon application to surcharge and falsify. The matter was referred, as it involved an accounting, and resulted in benefit to the estate; whereupon application was made for allowance out of the estate of counsel fees to attorneys for the two respondents who demanded that the executor and trustee be called to book. Application denied on the ground that the court “is without power to make such allowance.” Appeal by applicants.

*Pou & Pou and R. L. McMillan for appellants.*

*Manning & Manning, A. B. Breece and Jones & Brassfield for appellees.*

Per Curiam.

Affirmed on authority of *Mordecai v. Devereux,*74 N. C., 673, and *In re Will of Howell, ante,*437.

Affirmed.
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT






Board of Directors
Nittany Financial Corp.

We  have  reviewed  the  accompanying  consolidated  balance  sheet  of  Nittany
Financial  Corp. and   subsidiaries  as  of  June  30, 2001,   and  the  related
consolidated statements of income for the three and six-month periods ended June
30, 2001 and 2000,  the  consolidated  statement of cash flows for the six-month
period ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, and the  consolidated  statement of changes
in  stockholders'  equity for the  six-month  period ended June 30, 2001.  These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute  of  Certified  Public  Accountants.  A review  of  interim  financial
information  consists  principally  of applying  analytical  and  procedures  to
financial  data and making  inquiries of persons  responsible  for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is
the  expression  of an opinion  regarding the  financial  statements  taken as a
whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material  modifications that should
be made to the  accompanying  financial  statements for them to be in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles.

We have  previously  audited,  in accordance  with generally  accepted  auditing
standards,  the  consolidated  balance  sheet as of December 31,  2000,  and the
related consolidated  statements of income,  changes in stockholders' equity and
cash  flows for the year then ended (not  presented  herein);  and in our report
dated February 9, 2001 we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated
financial statements


/s/S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.

Wexford, PA
August 10, 2001