alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 32 (Thursday, February 16, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 8942-8943]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3833]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
33 CFR Part 161

[CGD09-94-036]
RIN 2115-AF01


Temporary Speed Limits for the St. Marys River; Correction

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Final rules.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects the temporary final regulations [CGD09-
94-036] which were published on Monday, January 23, 1995, (60 FR 4378) 
concerning the Speed Limits for the St. Marys River.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 16, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. Irene Hoffman, Project Manager, Vessel Traffic Services Division 
(G-NVT), at (202) 267-6277.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    In accordance with an agreement reached on June 29, 1993, with the 
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and 
the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, the Coast Guard may make 
temporary changes to the speed regulations for periods during the 
winter season when icebreaking is being conducted in the vicinity of 
Neebish Island, St. Marys River, Michigan, as a precautionary measure 
to minimize any possible damage to the environment.
    In 59 FR 36324 of July 15, 1994; sections 161.1 through 161.60 of 
33 CFR Part 161 were revised. In this document revising Part 161, speed 
limit regulations for the St. Marys River were placed in 33 CFR Part 
162.
    On January 23, 1995, a document was published at page 4378 to amend 
33 CFR Part 161. This document, intended to address temporary speed 
limits in the St. Marys River, amended Part 161 by suspending 
Sec. 161.880 and adding Sec. 161.881. The suspension and addition were 
effective from December 29, 1994 through April 15, 1995.

Need for Correction

    The January 23, 1995, amendments did not make the needed temporary 
changes to the St. Marys River speed limits. That publication, 
therefore, needs to be revoked. A new temporary rulemaking addressing 
the St. Marys River speed limits in 33 CFR 162.117 will be prepared for 
publication.
    For this reason, under the authority of 33 U.S.C. 1231 and 49 CFR 
1.46, the suspension of Sec. 161.880 is terminated and Sec. 161.881 is 
removed.

    [[Page 8943]] Dated: February 8, 1995.
G.A. Penington,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Chief, Office of Navigation, Safety and 
Waterways Services.
[FR Doc. 95-3833 Filed 2-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-14-M
EXHIBIT 23.1



            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Forms S-3 (No. 333-106608, No. 333-108924, No. 333-10754, No. 333-110752, No.
333-82496, No. 333-91225, No. 333-91235 and No. 333-17105) and Forms S-8 (No.
333-109595 and No. 333-82410) of SpatiaLight, Inc. of our reports dated March 2,
2005 relating to the consolidated financial statements of SpatiaLight, Inc.,
SpatiaLight, Inc. management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting of SpatiaLight, Inc., included in this Annual Report on Form
10-K/A Amendment No. 4 for the year ended December 31, 2004.


/s/ ODENBERG, ULLAKKO, MURANISHI & CO. LLP

San Francisco, California
July 12, 2005
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and GraphsUpdated May 3, 2006   |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|

| Level of Monthly Benefits (PIA) | Description of Proposed Provision:      Increase the number of years used to calculate benefits for retirees and survivors (but not for disabled workers) from 35 to 38, phased in 2006-2010 |
|---------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2005 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map |
Order entered February 12, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00579-CR

No. 05-13-00580-CR

BRODERICK JACKSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-1258467-T

ORDER

We GRANT appellee’s second motion to extend time to file its brief. Appellee’s brief 

received on February 5, 2014 is ORDERED filed as of the date of this order. 

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
<PAGE>
 
                         Independent Auditors' Consent
                         -----------------------------



Board of Directors
Buttrey Food and Drug Stores Company:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-8 (Nos. 33-59236, 33-70750, and 33-94590) and Form S-3 (No. 33-80688) of
Buttrey Food and Drug Stores Company of our report dated April 11, 1997 relating
to the consolidated balance sheets of Buttrey Food and Drug Stores Company and
subsidiary as of February 1, 1997, February 3, 1996 and January 28, 1995, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and
cash flows for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended February
1, 1997, which report appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Buttrey Food
and Drug Stores Company for the fiscal year ended February 1, 1997.

/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Billings, Montana
April 28, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998             MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      13,801,190               1,276,209
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,804,390               2,301,233
<ALLOWANCES>                                   125,000                 125,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,913,008               4,826,523
<PP&E>                                     519,996,802             611,129,562
<DEPRECIATION>                              28,964,462              38,884,158
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             516,148,101             584,527,256
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       26,183,169              19,566,755
<BONDS>                                    417,524,082             352,876,045
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       29,882,298                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 59,928,980                       0
<COMMON>                                     1,761,418                  32,026
<OTHER-SE>                                (19,257,718)             211,868,803
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               516,148,101             584,527,256
<SALES>                                      5,372,833              12,008,208
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,372,833              12,008,208
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  851,371               2,232,651
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,340,361              17,178,437
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,102,826               3,900,192
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,921,725)            (11,303,072)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,921,725)            (11,303,072)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,921,725)            (11,303,072)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.43)                  (0.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE v. MACK RIGSBEE and MRS. M. M. RIGSBEE.

(Filed 6 January, 1937.)

Intoxicating Liquor § 4c—

Where the husband, with full knowledge, permits his wife to possess intoxicating liquor on the premises for the purpose of sale, the husband is equally guilty with the wife.

Appeal by defendant Mack Rigsbee from *Spears, J.,*at April Term, 1936, of G-banville.

ETo error.

The defendants were tried on an indictment in which they were charged with having intoxicating liquor in their possession for the purpose of sale.

The evidence for the State tended to show that on or about 19 December, 1935, the defendants, who are husband and wife, had in their home in Granville County, twelve one-half-gallon jars of whiskey; that these jars were concealed behind the chimney in the attic of their home; and that there was a number of empty jars in the attic and about the premises, all having the odor of whiskey about them.

The evidence for the defendants tended to show that the whiskey in the jars was purchased by the defendant Mrs. M. M. Rigsbee, for her own use, and that her husband, the defendant Mack Rigsbee, knew that she had the whiskey in their home.

Both defendants were convicted.

From judgment that he be confined in the county jail of Granville County for twelve months and be assigned to work on the public roads of the State, the defendant Mack Rigsbee appealed to the Supreme Court, assigning error in the instructions of the court to the jury.

*Attorney-General Seawell and Assistant Attorney-General McMullan for the State.*

*Hugh Scarlett for defendant.*

*129Per Curiam.

At the trial of this action, the court instructed, the jury as follows:

> “RTow, gentlemen of the jury, the court instructs you as a matter of law, that if you find from the evidence, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Mrs. M. M. Rigsbee had in her possession on the premises occupied by her husband, Mack Rigsbee, intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale, and that he knew that she had it there and permitted her to keep it there, then upon that finding it would be your duty to return a verdict that he is guilty of having intoxicating liquor in his possession for the purpose of sale.”

The defendant Mack Rigsbee excepted to this instruction, and on his appeal assigns same as error.

There is no error in the instruction. See *S. v. Hardy,*209 N. C., 83, 182 S. E., 831.

Ro error.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3914 

To require the Securities and Exchange Commission to revise the definition 

of a qualifying investment, for purposes of the exemption from registration for venture capital fund advisers under the Investment Advisers 

Act of 1940, to include an equity security issued by a qualifying portfolio 

company and to include an investment in another venture capital fund, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 24, 2022 

Mr. ROUNDS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To require the Securities and Exchange Commission to revise 

the definition of a qualifying investment, for purposes 

of the exemption from registration for venture capital 

fund advisers under the Investment Advisers Act of 

1940, to include an equity security issued by a qualifying 

portfolio company and to include an investment in another venture capital fund, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3914 IS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Developing and Em3 powering our Aspiring Leaders Act of 2022’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

5 Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment 

6 of this Act, the Securities and Exchange Commission 

7 shall— 

8 (1) revise the definition of a qualifying invest9 ment under paragraph (c) of section 275.203(l)–1 of 

10 title 17, Code of Federal Regulations— 

11 (A) to include an equity security issued by 

12 a qualifying portfolio company, whether ac13 quired directly from the company or in a sec14 ondary acquisition; and 

15 (B) to specify that an investment in an16 other venture capital fund is a qualifying in17 vestment under that definition; and 

18 (2) revise paragraph (a) of section 275.203(l)– 

19 1 of title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, to re20 quire, as a condition of a private fund qualifying as 

21 a venture capital fund under that paragraph, that 

22 the qualifying investments of the private fund are— 

23 (A) predominantly qualifying investments 

24 that were acquired directly from a qualifying 

25 portfolio company; or 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3914 IS

1 (B) predominantly qualifying investments 

2 in another venture capital fund or other venture 

3 capital funds. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Level of Monthly Benefits (PIA) | Description of Proposed Provision:      For OASI beneficiaries becoming eligible for benefits in 2021 and later, multiply the PIA factors by the ratio of life expectancy at 67 for 2016 to the life expectancy at age 67 for the 4th year prior to the year of benefit eligibility.  Unisex life expectancies, based on period life tables, would be used as projected by SSA's Office of the Chief Actuary.  Disability benefits are not affected by the proposal.  Disabled worker beneficiaries, upon attaining normal retirement age, would be subject to a proportional reduction in benefits based on the worker's years of disability. |
|---------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2008 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified July 16, 2008 |
#### Rondinella *v.*Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Appellant.

March 12, 1906:

*Insurance*— IAfe *insurance*— Proof *of death*— Evidence.

Where proofs of death are offered for the sole purpose of showing compliance with the condition precedent of the policy to the right to sue, and the defendant offers no evidence, the proofs cannot be used as proof of a breach of warranty apparent on the face of the papers.

Argued Oct. 19, 1905.

Appeal, No. 118, Oct. T., 1905, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 2, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1897, No. 742, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Ferdinand Rondinella, Guardian of Joseph Rizzo et al., Minors, v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company.

Before Rice, P. J., Beaver, Orlady, Porter, Morrison and Henderson, JJ.

Affirmed.

Judgment on verdict for plaintiff. Before Wiltbank, J.

The opinion of the Superior Court states the case.

'Verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $1,455. Defendant appealed. See 18 Pa. Superior Ct. 613 and 24 Pa. Superior Ct. 293.

*Error assigned*was in refusing binding instruction for defendant.

*Arthur G.*Dickson, with him *Dickson, McCouch & Glasgow,*for appellant.

*Frederick A. Sobernheimer,*with him *William A.*Gray, for appellee.

Opinion by

Rice, P. J.,

So far as the terms and conditions of the policy in suit, the statements in the application therefor and the statements in the proofs of death are concerned this case does not differ essentially from the case of Baldi v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, *ante, p.*213, in which we this day file an opinion. But, as intimated in that case, the restricted purpose for which alone the plaintiff offered and the court admitted the proofs *224of death is more explicitly stated in the record of the evidence. The offer as stated by counsel was : “ I will offer the proofs of death for the consideration of the court, in order that the court may determine, as a preliminary matter, whether there has been a sufficient compliance with the conditions precedent in the policy, with reference to the furnishing of the proofs.” The objection to this offer was overruled and an exception noted for the defendant. The plaintiff offered in evidence no explanation of the discrepancies between the statements contained in the proofs of death and the statements contained in the application, and the defendant offered no evidence whatever. As the case stood when the plaintiff rested, the policy had been put in evidence, together with the defendant’s admissions that the premiums had been duly paid, that the plaintiff was duly appointed guardian and that the insured died on September 11, 1897. The proofs were produced by the defendant upon plaintiff’s call and showed on their face sufficient compliance with the condition of the policy with reference to furnishing proofs of death. It is thus seen that the question raised by the single assignment of error, which is to the refusal of the court to give binding instructions for the defendant, is the same as the question considered by us in the Baldi case. For the reasons there given the assignment is overruled and the judgment affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                      STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                        OF PREMIERE GLOBAL SERVICES, INC.
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    ss. 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with  Amendment  No. 1 to the Annual Report of Premiere
Global  Services,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  the undersigned Michael E. Havener,  Chief Financial Officer of
the Company,  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                        /s/ Michael E. Havener
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Michael E. Havener
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        Premiere Global Services, Inc.
                                        April 30, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 28, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 10895]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4785]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

Information Collection Under OMB Review: Statement of Holder or 
Servicer of Veteran's Loan, VA Form Letter 26-559

AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Veterans Affairs has submitted to OMB the 
following proposal for the collection of information under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). This 
document lists the following information: (1) The title of the 
information collection, and the Department form number(s), if 
applicable; (2) a description of the need and its use; (3) who will be 
required or asked to respond; (4) an estimate of the total annual 
reporting hours, and recordkeeping burden, if applicable; (5) the 
estimated average burden hours per respondent; (6) the frequency of 
response; and (7) an estimated number of respondents.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the proposed information collection and supporting 
documents may be obtained from Trish Fineran, Veterans Benefits 
Administration (20M30), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont 
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20420, (202) 273-6886.
    Comments and questions about the items on the list should be 
directed to VA's OMB Desk Officer, Joseph Lackey, NEOB, Room 3002, 
Washington, DC 20503, (202) 395-7316. Do not send requests for benefits 
to this address.

DATES: Comments on the information collection should be directed to the 
OMB Desk Officer on or before March 30, 1995.

    Dated: February 21, 1995.

    By direction of the Secretary.
Ronald C. Taylor,
Management Analyst.

Extension

    1. Statement of Holder or Servicer of Veteran's Loan, VA Form 
Letter 26-559
    2. This form letter is completed by holders or servicers of 
guaranteed or insured home loans from which obligors may be released 
from liability and/or substitution entitlement. Information collected 
is used to determine that the loan is current.
    3. Business or other for profit.
    4. 2,500 hours.
    5. 10 minutes.
    6. On occasion.
    7. 15,000 respondents.
[FR Doc. 95-4785 Filed 2-27-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M