alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 22 (Wednesday, February 3, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5731-5732]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-01957]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 1894-207]


South Carolina Electric & Gas Company; South Carolina Parr 
Hydroelectric Project; Notice of Proposed Revised Restricted Service 
List for a Programmatic Agreement

    Rule 2010 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's 
(Commission) Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.2010, provides 
that, to eliminate unnecessary expense or improve administrative 
efficiency, the Secretary may establish a restricted service list for a 
particular phase or issue in a proceeding concerning non-public 
information. The restricted service list should contain the names of 
persons on the service list who, in the judgment of the decisional 
authority establishing the list, are active participants with respect 
to the phase or issue in the proceeding for which the list is 
established.
    The Commission staff is consulting with the Maine Historic 
Preservation Commission (Maine SHPO) and the Advisory Council on 
Historic Preservation (Advisory Council) pursuant to the Advisory 
Council's regulations, 36 CFR part 800, implementing section 106 of the 
National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, (54 U.S.C. 306108), to 
prepare a Programmatic Agreement for managing properties included in, 
or eligible for inclusion in, the National Register of Historic Places 
at the existing Parr Hydroelectric Project.
    On November 18, 2014, Commission staff established a restricted 
service list for the Parr Hydroelectric Project. Since that time, the 
U.S. Forest Service requested to supplement the restricted service list 
because of personnel changes. The restricted service list is 
supplemented as follows:
    Replace ``Mike Harmon, U.S. Forest Service'' with ``James F. Bates 
or Representative, U.S. Forest Service.''


[[Page 5732]]


    Dated: January 28, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-01957 Filed 2-2-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 13

- 00407

- CV

Jacek DZIERWA

, Appellant

v.

Veronica CERDA

, Appellee

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012

- CI

- 18975

Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE

, JUSTICE ANGELINI , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

REVERSED and the cause is REMANDED for new trial. The motion to dismiss f iled by Veronica

Cerda is DENIED.

We ORDER that Jacek Dzierwa recover his costs of this appeal from Veronica Cerda.

SIGNED August 6, 2014.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 7956** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. BENJAMIN LEE , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore
. Ellen L. Hollander , District Judge. ( 1:09

- cr - 00551

- ELH

- 1; 1:12

- cv - 01321

- ELH )

Submitted : June 10, 2014 Decided: August 5, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Benjamin Lee, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Marshall Nothstein, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland; Sujit Raman, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding prece dent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Benjamin Lee seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S. C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies thi s standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003).
W hen the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 48 4

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Lee has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. Lee moves to seal the entire case. While we see no compelling

reason to seal everything, see In re State

- Record Co. , 917 F.2d 124, 129 (4th Cir. 1990) (docket entry sheet not likely to3 contain information prejudicial to the criminal defendant), we will grant the motion insofar as it pert ains to his informal brief and the mo tion to seal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 4 (Friday, January 6, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 2175]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-440]



                Sunshine Act Meetings



Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 4 / Friday, January 6, 1995 / 
Sunshine Act Meetings
[[Page 2175]] 

Commodity Futures Trading

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, January 6, 1995.

PLACE: 2033 K St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 8th Floor Hearing Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-254-6314.
Jean A. Webb,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 95-440 Filed 1-4-95; 2:43 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

MARCEL DEWAYNE THOMPSON

NO. 2023 KW 0895

OCTOBER 23, 2023

In Re: Marcel Dewayne Thompson, applying for supervisory

writs, 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. 

Tammany, No. 558732. 

BEFORE: WELCH, HOLDRIDGE, AND WOLFE, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. The record shows that in exchange for a

forty -year sentence on a double bill, relator voluntarily waived

his right to a habitual offender hearing and stipulated to the

allegations contained in the habitual offender bill of

information. As a result, relator waived appellate review of

the sentence, his status as a habitual offender, and any claim

that the State failed to prove the applicable cleansing period

did not lapse. See La. R. S. 15: 529. 1 ( D) ( 1) ( b) ; State v. White, 

2021- 0202 ( La. App. lst Cir. 10/ 4/ 21), 330 So. 3d 663, 666- 67. 

Therefore, the district court did not err by denying the motion

to correct an illegal habitual offender sentence.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 5 (Monday, January 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 2402]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-414]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION
[Finance Docket No. 31717]


Iowa Power, Inc.--Construction Exemption--Council Bluffs, Iowa 
and

[Finance Docket No. 32453]

CBEC Railway, Inc.--Acquisition and Operation Exemption--Great 
Western Railway Company of Iowa, Inc.--Council Bluffs, IA

    The Iowa Power, Inc. (Iowa Power) has petitioned the Interstate 
Commerce Commission (Commission) for authority to construct and operate 
a 3.0 mile rail line in Council Bluffs, Iowa. In a related proceeding, 
CBEC Railway, Inc. (CBEC) acquired an existing three mile rail line 
which it would rehabilitate and operate in order to carry the traffic 
generated from the proposed rail construction project, if approved by 
the Commission. The Commission's Section of Environmental Analysis 
(SEA) has prepared its Environmental Assessment (EA). Based on the 
information provided and the environmental analysis conducted to date, 
this EA concludes that this proposal should not significantly affect 
the quality of the human environment if the recommended mitigation 
measures set forth in the EA are implemented. Accordingly, SEA 
preliminarily recommends that the Commission impose on any decision 
approving the proposed construction and operation conditions that would 
implement the mitigation measures contained in the EA. The EA will be 
served on all parties of record as well as all appropriate Federal, 
state and local officials and will be made available to the public upon 
request. SEA will consider all comments received in response to the EA 
in making final environmental recommendations to the Commission. The 
Commission will then consider SEA's final recommendations and the 
environmental record in making its final decision in this proceeding.
    Comments (an original and 10 copies) and any questions regarding 
this EA should be filed with the Commission's Section of Environmental 
Analysis, Office of Economic and Environmental Analysis, Room 3219, 
Interstate Commerce Commission, Washington, DC 20423, to the attention 
of Ms. Tawanna Glover-Sanders (202) 927-6203. Requests for copies of 
the EA should also be directed to Ms. Glover-Sanders.
    Date made available to the public: January 6, 1995.
    Comment due date: February 6, 1995.

    By the Commission, Elaine K. Kaiser, Chief, Section of 
Environmental Analysis, Office of Economic and Environmental 
Analysis.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-414 Filed 1-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7035-01-P
EXHIBIT 23.02

CONSENT OF KPMG, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The
Board of Directors
Merant plc:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-24867, 333-45701, 333-65027 and 333-92819) on
Form S-8 of Merant plc of our report dated October 22, 2003, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of Merant plc and its subsidiaries as of April 30, 2003 and the
related consolidated profit and loss account, consolidated statement of cash flows, total recognised gains and losses and reconciliation of movements in shareholders' funds for the year ended
April 30, 2003 which report appears in the 2003 Annual Report on Form 20-F of Merant plc.

KPMG
Audit Plc
St Albans, England
23 October 2003

---

QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 36 (Thursday, February 23, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 10056]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4331]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 68

[CC Docket No. 94-102: DA 95-141]


Ensuring Compatibility With Enhanced 911 Emergency Calling 
Systems

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of time for reply comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: By Order adopted February 1, 1995, the Commission granted a 
request for extension of time of the reply comment period in this 
proceeding concerning enhanced 911 emergency calling systems. This 
action was taken as a result of motions filed by the Personal 
Communications Industry Association (PCIA) and the Association of 
Public-Safety Communications Officials-International, Inc. (APCO). 
Intended effect of action is to develop a more complete record.

DATES: Reply comments are due on or before March 17, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan A. Thomas, Domestic Services 
Branch, Common Carrier Bureau, telephone (202) 634-1802.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary to two Motions for 
Extension of Time for filing reply comments to the Commission's Notice 
of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) in CC docket No. 94-102, released 
October 19, 1994 [59 FR 54878, November 2, 1994.] The comment date was 
January 9, 1995, and the original reply comment date was February 8, 
1995. The Commission noted that extension of time are not routinely 
granted; however, the public safety issues in this proceeding are 
obvious and significant. Given the over 1500 pages already filed, the 
Commission agreed that it would be in the public interest to extend the 
time in which to file reply comments.

Federal Communications Commission.
Kathleen M.H. Wallman,
Cheif, Common Carrier Bureau.
[FR Doc. 95-4331 Filed 2-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
8130 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 28 / Friday, February 10, 1995 / Notices

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs

Wyandot Nation of Kansas; Receipt of

Petition for Federal Acknowledgment

of Existence as an Indian Tribe

This is published in the exercise of

authority delegated by the Secretary of

the Interior to the Assistant Secretary—

Indian Affairs by 209 DM 8.

Pursuant to 25 CFR 83.8(a) (formerly

25 CFR 54.8(a)) notice is hereby given

that the

Wyandot Nation of Kansas, c/o George

Zane, 5412 Tomahawk Road, Prairie

Village, Kansas 66208

has filed a petition for acknowledgment

by the Secretary of the Interior that the

group exists as an Indian tribe. The

petition was received by the Bureau of

Indian Affairs (BIA) on May 12, 1994,

and was signed by members of the

group’s governing body.

This is a notice of receipt of petition

and does not constitute notice that the

petition is under active consideration.

Notice of active consideration will be

sent by mail to the petitioner and other

interested parties at the appropriate

time.

Under § 83.8(d) (formerly 54.8(d)) of

the Federal regulations, interested

parties may submit factual and/or legal

arguments in support of or in opposition

to the group’s petition. Any information

submitted will be made available on the

same basis as other information in the

BIA’s files. Such submissions will be

provided to the petitioner upon receipt

by the BIA. The petitioner will be

provided an opportunity to respond to

such submissions prior to a final

determination regarding the petitioner’s

status.

The petition may be examined, by

appointment, in the Department of the

Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs,

Branch of Acknowledgment and

Research, Room 1362–MIB, 1849 C

Street, NW., Washington, DC 20240,

Phone: (202) 208–3592.

Dated: January 24, 1995.

Ada E. Deer,

Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

[FR Doc. 95–3307 Filed 2–9–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–02–P
Exhibit 32.2 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending December 31, 2004 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jerry C. Young, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Shaw receives third star, transfers to Space Force

By U.S. Space Command Public Affairs OfficeU.S. Space Command

                PETERSON AIR FORCE BASE, Colo.  –              
U.S. Space Command's incoming deputy commander was promoted to lieutenant general and officially transferred from the U.S. Air Force to the U.S. Space Force during a ceremony Nov. 23, 2020, at the U.S. Air Force Academy in Colorado Springs, Colorado. Lt. Gen. John Shaw will take on duties as the 11th combatant command's deputy starting Nov. 24. 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

SURESH PACKIRISAMY, 

 Petitioner

v.

BANUPRIYA SURESH,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 673 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 25th day of May, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
#### CLYDE D. HOPKINS v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY.

(Filed 30 October, 1946.)

Railroads § 4—

Where plaintiff alleges negligence on the part of defendant railroad company in failing under the circumstances to maintain lights, watchman or guards at a public crossing, but plaintiff’s evidence discloses that the lights on his car were burning and that he ran into the train, nonsuit is proper for failure of evidence tending to show any causal relation between the negligence complained of and the injury.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Sinlc, J.,*at February Term, 1946, of Cabarrus.

Civil action to recover for personal injuries allegedly resulting from actionable negligence of defendant in failing under tbe circumstances to maintain “lights, watchman or guards or facilities to protect tbe public at tbe point where tbe said railroad makes a crossing of "West Corbin Street,” in tbe city of Concord, North Carolina.

Tbe evidence for plaintiff tends to show, succinctly stated, tbat between 11 and 12 o’clock on tbe night of 6 September, 1945, as be, riding in bis *656automobile, with lights in good condition, approached the railroad crossing on West Corbin Street, upgrade to the east, he came to a complete stop, about 30 or 35 feet from the main southbound track, and looked and listened and, failing to see or to hear anything, started on across, and when he “got up on the track” he saw the passing train when he “was within four feet of it, — too late to stop”; that “the weather was rainy, foggy ... a pretty heavy mist and fog”; that “when . . . within four feet of the train” he “discovered at thát time there was smoke mixed in with the fog and mist and rain”; that “there were not any signal devices there, no watchman, no lights, no bells, no gates,” and that he collided with the train — the train “snatched the car,” and he sustained injuries.

From judgment as of nonsuit at close of plaintiff’s evidence, he appeals to Supreme Court and assigns error.

*B. W. Blackwelder for plaintiff, appellant.*

*Hartsell & Hartsell for defendant, appellee.*

Per Curiam.

A careful consideration of the evidence offered by plaintiff fails to show any causal relation between the acts of negligence alleged and the injury sustained. No new principle of law is involved. Old and well established principles of law support the action of the court in sustaining demurrer to the evidence.

Affirmed.
#### IN RE: Adoption of — VIRGINIA ANN ANDERSON.

(Filed 4 November, 1959.)

1. Appeal and Error § 33—

Where the record does not show that the term of court was regularly held or that the proceeding was properly instituted, or the pleadings, the appeal must be dismissed. Rule 19, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court.

Higgins, J., not sitting.

Appeal by petitioners from *Gwyn, J.,*June Civil Term, 1959, of WlLKES.

*177This is purportedly a proceeding in which the petitioners, Roy Anderson and Viola Anderson, are seeking to adopt the minor child of Geraldine Johnson Gornelius.

The petitioners .appeal only from conclusions of law and the judgment entered pursuant thereto.

*J. F. Jordan for petitioners.*

*Tressie Pierce Fletcher for respondent.*

PER Curiam.

The record contains nothing to show that the term of court was regularly held or that the proceeding was properly instituted. *Brown v. Johnson,*207 N.C. 807, 178 S.E. 570. Moreover the petitioners’ petition is not included in the transcript. Nothing is contained in the record except the findings of fact, the conclusions of law and the judgment entered pursuant thereto.

Consequently, the appeal is dismissed under Rule 19, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N.C. 553, *et seq.*See also *Pruitt v. Wood,*199 N.C. 788, 156 S.E. 126 and *Waters v. Waters,*199 N.C. 667, 155 S.E. 564.

Appeal dismissed.

Higgins, J., not sitting.
Exhibit 23.1  GRAPHIC  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 of HF Financial Corp. (333-103138, 333-83940, 333-50299 and 333-50313) pertaining to the HF Financial Corp. 2002 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, the Retirement Savings Plan, the 1991 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, and the 1996 Director Restricted Stock Plan of our report dated September 9, 2011, accompanying the consolidated financial statements and internal controls included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of HF Financial Corp. for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011.    Sioux Falls, South Dakota September 9, 2011  www.eidebailly.com 200 E. 10th St., Ste. 500  |  P.O. Box 5125  |  Sioux Falls, SD 57117-5125  |  T 605.339.1999  |  F 605.339.1306  |  EOE
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 23.10

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Lincare Holdings Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
Nos. 33-55202, 33-595656, 33-90602, 333-46969, 333-71159, 333-78719 and
333-74672 on Form S-8 of Lincare Holdings Inc. of our report dated February 8,
2002, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Lincare Holdings Inc.
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001, and related
consolidated financial statement schedule, which report appears in the December
31, 2001 annual report on Form 10-K of Lincare Holdings Inc.



St Petersburg, Florida
March 28, 2002