alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 244 (Wednesday, December 20, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 65671]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30889]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. Part 110]


In the Matter of Holders of Specific Licenses Authorizing Exports 
of Utilization Facilities and Source or Special Nuclear Materials to 
Euratom; Order Suspending Licenses

Effective January 1, 1996.

I

    The licensees that are subject to this order hold specific licenses 
issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) 
pursuant to Sections 53, 54a, 57, 64, 82, 103, 104 of the Atomic Energy 
Act of 1954, as amended (AEA) and 10 CFR part 110. These specific 
licenses authorize exports to EURATOM of utilization facilities, 
special nuclear materials, and source materials for nuclear and uses 
under the terms of an Agreement for Cooperation between the U.S. and 
EURATOM.

II

    The current U.S.-EURATOM Agreement for Cooperation will expire on 
December 31, 1995. A new Agreement has been approved by authorities on 
both sides, but must sit before Congress for review for up to 90 days 
of continuous legislative session. Under Section 123 of the AEA, the 
NRC is prohibited from authorizing any exports to a foreign nation 
pursuant to Section 53, 54a, 57, 64, 82, 103 or 104 of the AEA in the 
absence of an Agreement for Cooperation between the U.S. and the 
foreign nation.

III

    Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 123, 161b, 161i, 183, and 186 of 
the AEA, and 10 CFR 110.50(a)(1) and (2) and 110.52, from January 1, 
1996 until such time that a new U.S.-EURATOM agreement comes into 
force,\1\ NRC specific license authorization for nuclear exports to 
EURATOM under Sections 53, 54a, 57, 64, 82, 103, 104 of the AEA is 
suspended.\2\ This suspension order expires by operation of law when a 
new Agreement for Cooperation between the U.S. and EURATOM comes into 
force and necessary assurances form EURATOM are received.

    \1\ The EURATOM Member States are: Austria, Belgium, Denmark, 
Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, 
Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. 
Licensees holding free-standing licenses to Finland, Spain, or 
Sweden may continue direct exports to these countries because they 
had concluded bilateral Agreements with the U.S. before joining 
EURATOM. Such Agreements will remain valid until a new U.S.-EURATOM 
Agreement comes into force.
    \2\ In accordance with 10 CFR 110.52(c), the Commission finds 
that licensees need not be afforded an opportunity to reply and be 
heard since this action is required by operation of law and the 
common defense and security.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dated: at Rockville, Maryland this 14th day of December, 1995.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Carlton R. Stoiber,
Director, Office of International Programs.
[FR Doc. 95-30889 Filed 12-19-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 28 (Friday, February 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7961]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3325]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. ER95-405-000]


The Toledo Edison Co.; Notice Rescinding Published Notice

February 3, 1995.
    On January 19, 1995 the above-docketed notice of filing was issued 
by the Commission and published in the Federal Register on January 26, 
1995 (60 FR 5173), under the group heading of Northern States Power 
Company (NM), et al., Docket No. ER95-403-000, et al.
    On January 27, 1995 (60 FR 5377), the same notice was inadvertently 
published in the Federal Register under the group heading of 
Southwestern Public Service Company, et al., Docket No. EL93-53-000, et 
al.
    Please disregard the January 27, 1995 Federal Register notice.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-3325 Filed 2-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 32 (Thursday, February 16, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9029]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3847]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP95-199-000]


Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.; Notice of Application

February 10, 1995.
    Take notice that on February 7, 1995, Transcontinental Gas Pipe 
Line Corporation (TGPL), P.O. Box 1396, Houston, Texas 77251, filed in 
Docket No. CP95-199-000 an application pursuant to Section 7(b) of the 
Natural Gas Act for permission and approval to abandon a firm gas 
transportation service to Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America 
(NGPL), which was authorized in Docket No. CP76-007-000, all as more 
fully set forth in the application on file with the Commission and open 
to public inspection.
    TGPL states that it seeks authorization to abandon TGPL's Rate 
Schedule X-75, effective as of April 29, 1995. TGPL states that NGPL no 
longer needs such service, and TGPL and NGPL have mutually agreed to 
terminate Rate Schedule X-75.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with 
reference to said application should on or before March 3, 1995, file 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20426, a 
motion to intervene or a protest in accordance with the requirements of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 
385.211) and the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). 
All protests filed with the Commission will be considered by it in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to 
make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party to a proceeding or to participate as a party in any 
hearing therein must file a motion to intervene in accordance with the 
Commission's Rules.
    Take further notice that, pursuant to the authority contained in 
and subject to the jurisdiction conferred upon the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission by Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, a hearing will be 
held without further notice before the Commission or its designee on 
this application if no motion to intervene is filed within the time 
required herein, if the Commission on its own review of the matter 
finds that permission and approval for the proposed abandonment are 
required by the public convenience and necessity. If a motion for leave 
to intervene is timely filed, or if the Commission on its own motion 
believes that a formal hearing is required, further notice of such 
hearing will be duly given.
    Under the procedure herein provided for, unless otherwise advised, 
it will be unnecessary for TGPL to appear or be represented at the 
hearing.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-3847 Filed 2-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**
EXHIBIT 23 

March 11, 2022 

Ms. Stacey Hollabaugh 

XTO Energy Inc. 

22777 Springwoods Village Parkway 

Spring, TX 77389-1425 

Re:        CRT ConsentLetter                 

Dear Ms. Hollabaugh: 

This letter is to confirm that Miller and Lents, Ltd. (M&L) authorizes XTO Energy Inc. (XTO) to use our name and report dated January 21, 2022, related to theCross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) for use in the electronic filing of the CRT Annual Report on Form 10-K with the SEC. 

Please provide us with an exact copy of the Annual Report on Form 10-K as electronically filed with the SEC. 

 
Very truly yours,MILLER AND LENTS, LTD.Texas Registered Engineering Firm No. F-1442By 
/S/ JENNIFER A. GODBOLD
 Jennifer A. Godbold, P. E. Senior Vice President**
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 241 (Friday, December 15, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 64315]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30552]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 25

[Docket No. NM-112; Special Conditions No. 25-ANM-108]]


Special Conditions: Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation, Model 
Gulfstream V, High Altitude Operations

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Final special conditions; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In the October 17, 1995, issue of the Federal Register, the 
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) published final special 
conditions No. 25-ANM-108 for the Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation, 
Model Gulfstream V airplane (High Altitude Operations). The special 
conditions as published contain two errors; an incorrect paragraph 
reference, and a mistype made by the Federal Register. This document 
corrects those errors.

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 16, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gerald Lakin, FAA, Standardization Branch, ANM-113, Transport Airplane 
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., 
Renton, Washington 98055-4056, telephone (206) 227-1187.

Adoption of the Correction

    Special Conditions No 25-ANM-108, published in the Federal Register 
on October 17, 1995 (60 FR 53691) is corrected as follows:
    On page 53691, column 3, under ``Novel or Unusual Design 
Features,'' paragraph 4, second sentence, remove ``grown'' and 
substitute ``growth'' in its place.
    On page 53693, column 3, under ``4 Pressurization,'' subparagraph 
(c), remove the reference to ``paragraphs d.1. and d.2.'' and 
substitute ``paragraph 4(a) and 4(b)'' in its place.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 6, 1995.
Darrell M. Pederson,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service, ANM-100.
[FR Doc. 95-30552 Filed 12-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

**LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OFREGISTRANT**

**Subsidiaries of DeCraneAircraft Holdings, Inc.**

AEROSPACE DISPLAY SYSTEMS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.

AUDIO INTERNATIONAL, INC., an Arkansas corporation.

AVTECH CORPORATION, a Washington corporation.

CARL F. BOOTH & CO., LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.

COLTECH, INC., a Texas corporation.

CUSTOM WOODWORK & PLASTICS, LLC, a Delaware limited liabilitycompany.

DAH–IP HOLDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation.

DAH–IP INFINITY, INC., a Delaware corporation.

DECRANE AIRCRAFT FURNITURE CO., LP, a Texas limited partnership.

DETTMERS INDUSTRIES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.

ERDA, INC., a Wisconsin corporation.

HOLLINGSEAD INTERNATIONAL, INC., a California corporation.

PATS, INC., a Maryland corporation.

PCI NEWCO, INC., a Delaware corporation.

PPI HOLDINGS, INC., a Kansas corporation.

PRECISION PATTERN, INC., a Kansas corporation.

THE INFINITY PARTNERS, LTD., a Texas limited partnership.

TRI–STAR ELECTRONICS EUROPE S.A., a Swiss company.

TRI–STAR ELECTRONICS INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Californiacorporation.

TRI–STAR TECHNOLOGIES, a California general partnership.

 

----
**
EXHIBIT 23 

February 20, 2023 

Tracie White 

XTO Energy Inc. 

22777 Springwoods Village Parkway 

Spring, Texas 77389-1425 

Re:        CRT Consent Letter         

Dear Tracie White: 

This letter is to confirm that Miller and Lents, Ltd. (M&L)authorizes XTO Energy Inc. (XTO) to use our name and report dated January 17, 2023, related to the Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) for use in the electronic filing of the CRT Annual Report on Form 10-Kwith the SEC. 

Please provide us with an exact copy of the Annual Report on Form 10-K as electronically filed with the SEC.

 

Very truly yours,

MILLER AND LENTS, LTD.

Texas Registered Engineering Firm No.F-1442
By 
/S/ JENNIFER A. GODBOLD
 Jennifer A. Godbold, P. E. Senior Vice President**
**Exhibit      32.1 **

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 **

**OF      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or                15(d) of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| April                21, 2008          |
|----------------------------------------|
| */s/                Stuart Posner*     |
| Mr.                Stuart Posner       |
| Chief                Executive Officer |

----
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.0
 
                                  ORCAD, INC.
 
                        STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION
                             OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                     (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
                                  (UNAUDITED)
 
     Earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994
were computed based on the weighted average number of common and dilutive common
equivalent shares outstanding. Common equivalent shares for the years ended
December 31, 1995 and 1994 include shares of Series A Preferred Stock that will
be converted into common shares upon consummation of the Company's initial
public offering. Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 83, all shares and options issued within one year prior to the
initial filing of the registration statement, if dilutive, were treated as if
they were outstanding for all reported periods.
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                                   ----------------------------
                                                                    1996       1995       1994
                                                                   ------     ------     ------
<S>                                                                <C>        <C>        <C>
Common Stock.....................................................   5,253        647        617
Common Stock issued for:
  Massteck Ltd...................................................     510        510        510
  Intelligent Systems Japan, K.K.................................     427        427        427
Common Stock Equivalents.........................................     526        534         --
Series A Preferred Stock.........................................      --      2,307      2,307
SAB 83 Adjustment................................................      --        350        350
                                                                   ------     ------     ------
Tax benefit of non-qualified stock options.......................     (98)        --         --
Total............................................................   6,618      4,775      4,211
                                                                   ======     ======     ======
Net Income (Loss)................................................  $4,202     $  315     $   29
                                                                   ======     ======     ======
Net Income (Loss) Per Share......................................  $  .63     $  .07     $  .01
                                                                   ======     ======     ======
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 364 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 364

To prohibit the use of funds to provide for the United States to become 
                    a party to the Paris Agreement.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 23, 2021

   Mrs. Blackburn (for herself, Mr. Tuberville, Mrs. Hyde-Smith, Mr. 
Barrasso, Mr. Marshall, Mr. Daines, Ms. Lummis, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Cotton, 
Mr. Cruz, and Mr. Wicker) introduced the following bill; which was read 
        twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the use of funds to provide for the United States to become 
                    a party to the Paris Agreement.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Taxpayer Funding for Paris 
Climate Agreement Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS TO PROVIDE FOR THE UNITED STATES TO 
              BECOME A PARTY TO THE PARIS AGREEMENT.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no 
funds may be appropriated, obligated, or expended to take any action to 
provide for the United States to become a party to the Paris Agreement.
    (b) Paris Agreement Defined.--In this section, the term ``Paris 
Agreement'' means the decision by the 21st Conference of the Parties to 
the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in Paris, 
France, adopted December 12, 2015.
                                 <all>
```
## Detailed Single Year Tables

- Individual Provisions
- Level of Monthly Benefits

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						B6.3: Provide an increase in the benefit level of any beneficiary who is 85 or older at the beginning of 2025 or who reaches their 85th birthday after the beginning of 2025. Increase the beneficiary's PIA based on an amount equal to the average retired-worker PIA at the end of 2024, or at the end of the year age 80 if later. Increase the beneficiary's PIA by 5 percent of this amount for those older than 85 at the beginning of 2025 and by 5 percent of this amount at age 85 for others, phased in at 1 percent per year for ages 81-85.**

### Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program

### Summarized Estimates
#### STATE v. LOUIS HARDY STRICKLAND.

(Filed 17 April, 1957.)

Criminal Law § 23—

A prosecution under an indictment void for failure to charge any criminal offense cannot bar .prosecution upon a subsequent valid indictment.

Appeal by defendant from *Sharp, S. J.,*June 1956 Term of Wake.

A bill of indictment was returned at the December 1955 Term. It contained three counts charging the defendant with (1) breaking and entering, (2) larceny of sixty pounds of wieners of the value of $25, and (3) receiving sixty pounds of wieners of the value of $25, knowing them to have been stolen.

Defendant pleaded not guilty, with a further plea of former j eopardy. In support of his plea of former jeopardy, defendant relies on the record in the case of *S. v. Strickland,*heard at the July Term of Wake Superior Court, heard here on appeal at the Fall Term 1955 and reported 243 N.C. 100, 89 S.E. 2d 781. During the trial, defendant moved to quash the indictment for inconsistency in the second and third counts. At the conclusion of the evidence the court sustained defendant’s motion to nonsuit the third count. The jury returned a verdict of guilty on the charges of breaking and entering, and larceny. Judgment of imprisonment was imposed and defendant appealed.

*Attorney-General Patton and Assistant Attorney-General McGal-liard for the State.*

*E. Reamuel Temple for defendant appellant.*

PeR Cttrtam.

Defendant’s plea of former jeopardy has no merit. The bill of indictment returned in July 1955 charged no criminal offense. He is now, for the first time, charged with the criminal offense of which he stands convicted. *S. v. Strickland,*243 N.C. 100, 89 S.E. 2d 781. The motion to quash is without merit. *S. v. Mincher,*178 N.C. 698, 100 S.E. 339. Defendant’s other assignments of error have been examined and have been found to be equally wanting in merit.

No error.
EXHIBIT 23.2


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of 
  Premiere Global Services, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Premiere Global
Services, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) Nos. 333-79599, 333-87635, 333-89891, 333-51380,
333-57698, 333-67292, 333-101262, 333-116506, 333-151962 and 333-167620 on Form S-8 of our report dated February 27, 2009 (March 14, 2011 as to Note 5), relating to the consolidated financial statements of the Company (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the retrospective adjustment of the 2008 consolidated financial statements for discontinued operations), appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Atlanta, GA

March 14, 2011

---
EXHIBIT 32.2



STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

OF PTEK HOLDINGS, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual
Report of PTEK Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned William E. Franklin,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ William E. FranklinWilliam E. FranklinExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerPTEK Holdings, Inc.March 15, 2004