Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 41 / Thursday, March 2, 1995 / Rules and Regulations 11625

repaired so that the performance of the

requirements of this AD is affected, the

owner/operator must use the authority

provided in paragraph (e) to request approval

from the FAA. This approval may address

either no action, if the current configuration

eliminates the unsafe condition; or different

actions necessary to address the unsafe

condition described in this AD. Such a

request should include an assessment of the

effect of the changed configuration on the

unsafe condition addressed by this AD. In no

case does the presence of any modification,

alteration, or repair remove any airplane from

the applicability of this AD.

Compliance: Required as indicated, unless

accomplished previously.

To prevent reduced structural integrity of

the airplane, accomplish the following:

(a) For airplanes listed in McDonnell

Douglas MD–11 Alert Service Bulletin A54–

49, dated December 2, 1994, accomplish the

requirements of paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2)

of this AD.

(1) Within 30 days after January 12, 1995

(the effective date of AD 94–26–11,

amendment 39–9106), unless accomplished

previously within the last 30 days prior to

January 12, 1995, perform a visual inspection

to detect cracking of the outboard and

inboard surfaces of the upper spar angles,

part numbers AUB7519–1/–2, on the number

1 and number 3 wing pylons, in accordance

with McDonnell Douglas MD–11 Alert

Service Bulletin A54–49, dated December 2,

1994.

(2) At the applicable time specified in

either paragraph (a)(2)(i) or (a)(2)(ii) of this

AD, submit a report of the results (both

positive and negative findings) of the

inspection required by paragraph (a) of this

AD to the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft

Certification Office (ACO), FAA, Transport

Airplane Directorate, 3960 Paramount

Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712; or

fax the report to (310) 627–5210. Information

collection requirements contained in this

regulation have been approved by the Office

of Management and Budget (OMB) under the

provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of

1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) and have been

assigned OMB Control Number 2120–0056.

(i) For airplanes on which the inspection

required by paragraph (a) of this AD is

accomplished after January 12, 1995: Submit

the report within 10 days after performing

the inspection required by paragraph (a) of

this AD.

(ii) For airplanes on which the inspection

required by paragraph (a) of this AD is

accomplished prior to January 12, 1995:

Submit the report within 10 days after

January 12, 1995.

(b) For airplanes listed in McDonnell

Douglas Alert Service Bulletin MD11–

54A049, Revision 1, dated February 7, 1995,

accomplish the requirements of paragraphs

(b)(1) and (b)(2) of this AD.

(1) Within 30 days after the effective date

of this AD, or within 60 days after

accomplishing the visual inspection required

by paragraph (a) of this AD, whichever

occurs later, perform a visual inspection to

detect cracking of the outboard and inboard

surfaces of the upper spar angles, part

numbers AUB7519–1/–2, on the number 1

and number 3 wing pylons, in accordance

with McDonnell Douglas Alert Service

Bulletin MD11–54A049, Revision 1, dated

February 7, 1995. Repeat this inspection

thereafter, prior to further flight, following

each incident of excessive maneuver,

turbulence overload (as defined in MD–11

Aircraft Maintenance Manual, chapter 05–

51–01), or hard landing (as defined in MD–

11 Aircraft Maintenance Manual, chapter 05–

51–03).

(2) At the applicable time specified in

either paragraph (b)(2)(i) or (b)(2)(ii) of this

AD, submit a report of the results (both

positive and negative findings) of the

inspections required by paragraph (b) of this

AD to the Manager, Los Angeles ACO, FAA,

Transport Airplane Directorate, 3960

Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California

90712; or fax the report to (310) 627–5210.

Information collection requirements

contained in this regulation have been

approved by the Office of Management and

Budget (OMB) under the provisions of the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C.

3501 et seq.) and have been assigned OMB

Control Number 2120–0056.

(i) For airplanes on which the inspection

required by paragraph (b) of this AD is

accomplished after the effective date of this

AD: Submit the report within 10 days after

performing any of the inspections required

by paragraph (b) of this AD.

(ii) For airplanes on which the inspection

required by paragraph (b) of this AD is

accomplished prior to the effective date of

this AD: Submit the report within 10 days

after the effective date of this AD.

(c) If no cracking is detected during the

inspections required by paragraphs (a) and

(b) of this AD, repeat the inspection required

by paragraph (b) of this AD thereafter at

intervals not to exceed 60 days or 300

landings, whichever occurs first, in

accordance with McDonnell Douglas Alert

Service Bulletin MD11–54A049, Revision 1,

dated February 7, 1995.

(d) If any cracking is detected during the

inspection required by either paragraph (a) or

(b) of this AD, prior to further flight, repair

in accordance with a method approved by

the Manager, Los Angeles ACO, FAA,

Transport Airplane Directorate.

(e) An alternative method of compliance or

adjustment of the compliance time that

provides an acceptable level of safety may be

used if approved by the Manager, Los

Angeles ACO, FAA, Transport Airplane

Directorate. Operators shall submit their

requests through an appropriate FAA

Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may

add comments and then send it to the

Manager, Los Angeles ACO.

Note 2: Information concerning the

existence of approved alternative methods of

compliance with this AD, if any, may be

obtained from the Los Angeles ACO.

(f) Special flight permits may be issued in

accordance with §§ 21.197 and 21.199 of the

Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197

and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a

location where the requirements of this AD

can be accomplished.

(g) The inspections shall be done in

accordance with McDonnell Douglas MD–11

Alert Service Bulletin MD11–54A049,

Revision 1, dated February 7, 1995, and

McDonnell Douglas MD–11 Alert Service

Bulletin A54–49, dated December 2, 1994.

The incorporation by reference of McDonnell

Douglas Alert Service Bulletin MD11–

54A049, Revision 1, dated February 7, 1995,

is approved by the Director of the Federal

Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a)

and 1 CFR part 51. The incorporation by

reference of McDonnell Douglas MD–11 Alert

Service Bulletin A54–49, dated December 2,

1994, was approved previously by the

Director of the Federal Register in accordance

with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51 as of

January 12, 1995 (59 FR 66669, December 28,

1994). Copies may be obtained from

McDonnell Douglas Corporation, P.O. Box

1771, Long Beach, California 90801–1771,

Attention: Business Unit Manager, Technical

Administrative Support, Dept. L51, M.C. 2–

98. Copies may be inspected at the FAA,

Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind

Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the

FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, Los

Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960

Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California;

or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800

North Capitol Street NW., suite 700,

Washington, DC.

(h) This amendment becomes effective on

March 17, 1995.

Issued in Renton, Washington, on February

23, 1995.

Darrell M. Pederson,

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 95–4983 Filed 3–1–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–U

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 94–ASO–24]

Amendment to Class D and Class E

Airspace; Fort Campbell, KY

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

SUMMARY: This action corrects an error

in the geographic coordinates of a final

rule that was published in the Federal

Register on December 21, 1994,

Airspace Docket No. 94–ASO–24. The

December 21, 1994, final rule corrected

the geographic positions of the Sabre

Army Heliport and the designations of

the Fort Campbell, KY, Class D and

Class E airspace areas.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, March 30,

1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michael J. Powderly, System

Management Branch, Air Traffic

Division, Federal Aviation

Administration, P.O. Box 20636,

Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404)

305–5570.
11626 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 41 / Thursday, March 2, 1995 / Rules and Regulations

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

Federal Register Document 94–31309,

Airspace Docket No. 94–ASO–24,

published on December 21, 1994 (59 FR

65705), corrected the geographic

position coordinates of the Sabre Army

Heliport and the designations of the

Class D and Class E airspace areas at

Fort Campbell, KY. An error was

discovered in the geographic position

coordinates of the Sabre Army Heliport.

This action corrects that error.

Correction to Final Rule

Accordingly, pursuant to the

authority delegated to me, the

geographic position coordinates for the

Class D and Class E airspace areas at

Fort Campbell, KY, as published in the

Federal Register on December 21, 1994

(59 FR 65705), (Federal Register

Document 94–31309; page 65706,

column 3), are corrected as follows:

§ 71.71 [Corrected]

* * * * *

ASO KY D Fort Campbell, KY [Corrected]

By removing ‘‘(Lat. 36°34′24′′ N, long.

87°28′50′′ W)’’ and substituting ‘‘(Lat.

36°34′14′′ N, long. 87°28′50′′ W)’’.

* * * * *

ASO KY E5 Fort Campbell, KY [Corrected]

By removing ‘‘(Lat. 36°34′24′′ N, long.

87°28′50′′ W)’’ and substituting ‘‘(Lat.

36°34′14′′ N, long. 87°28′50′′ W)’’.

* * * * *

Issued in College Park, Georgia, on

February 10, 1995.

Walter E. Denley,

Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division,

Southern Region.

[FR Doc. 95–4775 Filed 3–1–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND

URBAN DEVELOPMENT

Office of the Assistant Secretary for

Public and Indian Housing

24 CFR Parts 813, 905, 908, and 913

[Docket No. R–95–1747; FR–3730–F–03]

RIN 2577–AB47

Electronic Transmission of Required

Family Data for Public Housing, Indian

Housing, and the Section 8 Rental

Certificate, Rental Voucher, and

Moderate Rehabilitation Programs

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant

Secretary for Public and Indian

Housing, HUD.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: This rule requires all housing

agencies (HAs) to submit certain data

electronically to HUD in a HUD

prescribed format. For HAs that are not

already automated or who determine

that automation is not cost-effective,

transmission of the data through the use

of a service bureau is permitted.

Electronic transmission is necessary

because the manual submission of HUD

forms has become a burden to HAs and

HUD.

This rule applies to projects

administered under the public housing,

Indian housing, and Section 8 Rental

Certificate, Rental Voucher, and

Moderate Rehabilitation programs. A

similar rule was issued with respect to

multifamily subsidized projects

administered under programs subject to

the oversight of the Assistant Secretary

for Housing-Federal Housing

Commissioner (58 FR 61017), which

was codified at 24 CFR part 208.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 3, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For

Technical Information—Katherine M.

Dillon, Director, Information Services

Division, Office of Public and Indian

Housing, Room 4248, telephone (202)

708–5285. For Public Housing program

information—Edward C. Whipple,

Director, Occupancy Division, Office of

Public and Indian Housing, Room 4206,

telephone (202) 708–0744. For Native

American program information—Ed

Fagan, Office of Native American

Programs, Room B–133, telephone (202)

755–0088. These people may be reached

at the Department of Housing and Urban

Development, 451 Seventh Street, S.W.,

Washington, D.C. 20410. Hearing or

speech-impaired individuals may call

HUD’s TDD number (202) 708–4594.

(These telephone numbers are not tollfree.)

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Paperwork Burden

The information collection

requirements contained in this rule have

been reviewed by the Office of

Management and Budget (OMB) under

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980

(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520) and assigned

approval number 2577–0083, which

expires on August 31, 1997.

II. Background

On Thursday, October 6, 1994, the

Department published a proposed rule

that would require all housing agencies

(HAs) to submit certain data

electronically to HUD in a HUD

prescribed format.

Housing agencies have been

submitting data forms to HUD for each

family assisted under the public

housing, Indian housing, and Section 8

Rental Certificate, Rental Voucher and

Moderate Rehabilitation Programs.

Approximately 85 percent of reporting

agencies (3,655 HAs) have been

submitting paper forms. This extensive

processing of paper forms has become a

burden to the HAs as well as to HUD.

To reduce the cost to the Department

of processing this information and to

improve its accuracy, HUD issued the

proposed rule to require that this

information be submitted electronically.

The change is expected to contribute

significant savings to the Department, in

a time when budget constraints demand

such savings. The time spent by HAs in

initiating electronic collection and

transmission and making corrections to

the electronic data submissions will be

offset by future savings in the

reexamination and reporting process, as

well as increased accuracy and speed

associated with the admission,

reexamination and reporting processes,

and the reduced number of HUD

adjustments and paperwork required by

these adjustments.

The proposed rule requires HAs to

submit data electronically via telephone

modem, rather than through tape,

diskette, or paper. However, the rule

also provides that the Department may

approve transmission of the data by tape

or diskette where the Department

determines that the cost of telephonic

transmission would be excessive. For

HAs that are not already automated or

who determine that automation is not

cost effective, the rule would permit

transmission of the data through the use

of a service bureau.

In recognition of the difficulty some

HAs may have in conversion to

electronic submission of data, the

proposed rule permits HUD Field

Offices to grant extensions of time

beyond the stated implementation date

for commencement of electronic

submission under certain

circumstances.

This final rule adopts the proposed

rule, as published, in its entirety, with

the addition of a reference to Indian

housing programs in § 908.108(a).

III. Response to Public Comments

The Department received 16

comments on the proposed rule. The

commentors consisted of HAs and two

professional housing associations. Most

respondents expressed general support

for HUD’s implementation of the rule.

The following are major concerns

expressed by the commentors:

The most frequent category of concern

was raised by small HAs (100 units or

less in management), requesting that

they be excluded from the requirement