alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Highway Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) United States Department of Transportation (USDOT).

# ACTION:

Rescind Notice of Intent To Prepare an EIS.

# SUMMARY:

                        The FHWA is issuing this notice to advise the public that the Notice of Intent (NOI) for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to study the proposed transportation project (State Route 20) located in Cherokee and Forsyth Counties, Georgia, is being rescinded. The NOI was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on April 11, 2013. A Draft EIS was not released. The rescission is based on federal aid funding has been eliminated from the on the SR 20 project. The Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) will fund the project using state transportation funding.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Chetna P. Dixon, Environmental Coordinator, Federal Highway Administration Georgia Division, 61 Forsyth Street, Suite 17T100, Atlanta, Georgia 30303. Phone 404-562-3630 or Nicole Law, Project Manager, Georgia Department of Transportation, 600 West Peachtree Street, 25th Floor, Atlanta, Georgia 30308, Telephone: (404) 631-1723, Email:                         *nlaw@dot.ga.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On December 8, 2015, GDOT announced the improvements to SR 20 would be funded with state funding. Comments or questions concerning the rescission of the proposed action and the EIS should be directed to the FHWA at the address provided above.

Issued on: February 5, 2016.

William Farr,

Assistant Division Administrator, Federal Highway Administration, Atlanta, Georgia.

[FR Doc. 2016-02766 Filed 2-10-16; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE P
CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Intertape Polymer Group Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bernard J. Pitz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:

March 30, 2011



/s/ Bernard J. Pitz

Bernard J. Pitz,

Chief Financial Officer





ORLDOCS 12124257 1
Exhibit 21.1

PERFUMANIA HOLDINGS, INC.

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



|                                        |  |                       
|--------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                      |  | STATE OF INCORPORATION
|                                        | 
|Perfumania, Inc.                        |  | Florida               
|                                        | 
|Magnifique Parfumes and Cosmetics, Inc. |  | Florida               
|                                        | 
|Perfumania Puerto Rico, Inc.            |  | Puerto Rico           
|                                        | 
|Ten Kesef II, Inc.                      |  | Florida               
|                                        | 
|Perfumania.com, Inc.                    |  | Florida               
|                                        | 
|Quality King Fragrance, Inc.            |  | New York              
|                                        | 
|Five Star Fragrance Company, Inc.       |  | New York              
|                                        | 
|Scents of Worth                         |  | Florida               
|                                        | 
|Model Reorg Acquisition, LLC            |  | Delaware
#### James Roney, Appellant, v Bruce S. Aldridge, Respondent.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NASB Financial, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, David H. Hancock, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.


August 13, 2004          By: /s/ David H. Hancock
                             David H. Hancock
                             Chairman and Chief
                               Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to NASB Financial, Inc. and will be retained by NASB
Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.


This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein , and not for any
other purpose.

<Page>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9722]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4332]



      


                Sunshine Act Meetings



Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 34, Tuesday, February 21, 1995 / 
Sunshine Act Meetings



[[Page 9722]]


ASSASSINATION RECORD REVIEW BOARD

TIME AND DATE: 1:30 p.m., March 7, 1995.

PLACE: 600 E Street, NW, Second Floor, Washington, D.C. 20530.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

    1. Update by a representative of the National Archives and 
Records Administration (NARA) on the President John F. Kennedy 
Assassination Records Collection at NARA.
    2. Discussion of written public comments, received as of the 
date of this meeting, to the proposed interpretive regulations 
published for public comment by the Assassination Records Review 
Board in the Federal Register on February 8, 1995 (60 FR 7506, Feb. 
8, 1995).
    3. Staff reports on upcoming Board activities.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Thomas Samoluk, Press and Public 
Affairs Officer, 600 E Street NW., Second Floor, Washington, DC 20530. 
Telephone: (202) 724-0088; Fax: (202) 724-0457.
David G. Marwell,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 95-4332 Filed 2-16-95; 2:38 pm]
BILLING CODE 6820-TD-M
|EXHIBIT 23.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-3
Nos. 33-87908, 33-97710, 333-18347, 333-33390, 333-55821, 333-57580 and 333-115719 and
related Prospectuses of Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc. of our reports dated March 7,
2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Palomar Medical
Technologies, Inc., Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc. managements assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting of Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc. included
in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004.
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                      |                      
|--------------------- | ---------------------
|                      |                      
|                      | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|Boston, Massachusetts |                      
|March 7, 2005         |                      

|
|
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual Balance 

in 75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Ann

Balan

75th 

-1.92% -5.70% 1.49% 2.30% -0.44% -3.4

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2005 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actu

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Cost-of-Living Adjustment

Proposed Provision: Beginning December 2006, reduce cost-of-living adjustment for OASDI percentage point

January 4, 2006

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this prov

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

0.005.00

10.0015.0020.0025.00

2005 2015 2025 2035 2045 2055 2065 2075

Year

Percent

Cost rates with this provisionCost rates under present lawIncome rates with this provisionIncome rates under present law

OASDI tax rate schedule 

(employees and employers, each)

1993 and later 6.2%

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditu

0

100200300400500600700800900

1000

2005 2015 2025 2035 2045 205

Year

Percent

Present law with thi
#### JAY CHAPMAN v. C. F. LINEBERRY et al.

(Filed 7 December, 1927.)

Appeal by defendant, C. F. Lineberry, from order of *McElroy, J.,*at September Term, 1927, of AlexaNDEe.

Affirmed.

Motion by defendant, C. F. Lineberry, to set aside judgment rendered and verdict returned in this action at March Term, 1927, of Superior Court of Alexander County, for that same were irregular and were due to the excusable neglect of defendant to appear and defend the action. Defendant alleges that he has a meritorious defense.

From order refusing to allow the motion defendant appealed to the Supreme Court.

*F. J. McDuffie and J. H. Burlce for plaintiff.*

*W. M. Allen and W. G. Newland for defendant.*

Pee Oubiam.

Upon the facts found by the judge, upon the hearing of the motion, we find no error in his order refusing defendant’s motion. Both complaint and answer had been duly filed prior to March Term, 1927, and the action was docketed for trial at said term. This term was held in accordance with the provisions of the statutes relative to terms of the Superior Courts to be held in the several counties of the State. Defendant’s failure to attend and defend the action at the March Term cannot, upon the facts found, be held excusable.

Issues were submitted to a jury, and plaintiff offered evidence from which the jury returned the verdict under instruction of the court. This verdict supports the judgment. If there was error defendant’s remedy was by appeal and not by motion to set aside the judgment and verdict. We find no error, and the order is

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>  0000881791
<NAME>  USFreightywys Corp.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-28-1996

<CASH>                                         4,090
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  157,874
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               203,577
<PP&E>                                         395,500
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 688,508
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          144,348
<BONDS>                                        100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     269,260
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   688,508
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,330,972
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,263,844
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             12,144
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                54,929
<INCOME-TAX>                                   23,451
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            31,478
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   31,478
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.41
        


</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members         
    -  AEE Multimedia         
    -  AEE Research Library 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# PHOTOS ANDVIDEOS

Search

Search

                                - All Images 
                                - Other 
                                - Space Shuttle 

                                - Upload Date
                                - Photo Date
                                - Title

Clear Search20 results found.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

132400 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 132400 COA: 271732 Genesee CC: 03-012789-FH JONATHAN MICHAEL HILL, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

By order of January 29, 2007, the applic ation for leave to a ppeal the August 25, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals was he ld in abeyance pend ing the decision in People v Harper (Docket No. 130988). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on July 26, 2007, 479 Mich 5 99 (2007), the application is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not pe rsuaded that the questions pr esented should be reviewed by this Court.

l1022 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 29, 2007

Clerk
EXHIBIT  99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Integrated Information
Systems,  Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), for the quarterly period
ended  September  30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on  the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Donald H. Megrath, Senior Vice President,
Chief  Financial  Officer  and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934     (15 U.S.C. Section 78m(a) or
78o(d));  and

     (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the
Company.

INTEGRATED  INFORMATION  SYSTEMS,  INC.



/s/  Donald  H.  Megrath
------------------------
Donald  H.  Megrath
Senior  Vice  President,  Chief  Financial  Officer  and  Secretary

Date:  November  14,  2003




<PAGE>
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 30, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-41756

c/w No. 02-41790

c/w No. 02-41791

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ELEUTERIO GRACIA-GRACIA,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B:02-CR-619-1

Before JONES, BENAVIDES and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Eleuterio Gracia-Gracia appeals his illegal reentry

conviction and the revocation of the probationary term imposed

pursuant to his misdemeanor conviction for unlawful entry.

He argues that the imposition of a sentence of imprisonment upon

the revocation of his probationary term was plain error because he
2

was not advised of the dangers of self-representation when he

waived his right to counsel and pleaded guilty to unlawful entry.

Assuming arguendo that a direct appeal is the proper

avenue for Gracia-Gracia’s challenge, and that the factual

questions in regard to waiver of counsel are susceptible of review,

the record evidence shows that he validly waived his Sixth

Amendment right to counsel. With the aid of an interpreter, the

magistrate judge informed Gracia-Gracia three times of his right to

appointment of counsel and explained the maximum possible sentence

for his misdemeanor charge. Gracia-Gracia also signed a written

waiver drafted in his native Spanish, in which he acknowledged but

waived his right to appointment of counsel. Although Gracia-Gracia

was arraigned in a group, had only a sixth-grade education, and

could not speak English, he has never complained that he did not

understand the right to counsel or the consequence of its waiver.

Moreover, Gracia-Gracia was able to appreciate the value of that

right during his prior adjudication on the charge of alien

transportation. We therefore hold that Gracia-Gracia validly

waived his Sixth Amendment right. See Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407

U.S. 25, 37 (1972).

Gracia-Gracia concedes that the issue whether 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b)(1)&(2) is unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New

Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v.

United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), and he raises it only to

preserve its further review. We must follow the precedent set
3

in Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself

determines to overrule it.” United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979,

984 (5th Cir. 2000) (internal quotation and citation omitted).

AFFIRMED.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 13-1809

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Stephen Eugene White

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis

____________

 Submitted: August 1, 2013

 Filed: August 8, 2013 

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Stephen White directly appeals the eleven-month prison term that the district

court imposed upon revoking his supervised release. His counsel has moved to 1

The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern 1

District of Missouri.
withdraw, and has filed a brief indicating that there is no issue of arguable merit in

this case.

Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court imposed a statutorily

authorized revocation sentence, given that White’s underlying offense was a Class C

felony. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) (court may impose revocation sentence of no

more than 2 years in prison if underlying offense was Class C felony). We further

conclude that the district court’s sentencing decision reflects no abuse of discretion. 

See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 915-16 (8th Cir. 2009) (court reviews

revocation sentencing decisions using same standards as applied to initial sentencing

decisions); United States v. Perkins, 526 F.3d 1107, 1110 (8th Cir. 2008) (appellate

court reviews revocation sentence for abuse of discretion, ensuring sentence is

reasonable); see also United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir. 2009) (en

banc) (describing ways in which district court might be found to have committed

abuse of discretion).

The judgment is affirmed. In addition, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________

-2-