10060 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 36 / Thursday, February 23, 1995 / Notices

Because of these court rulings, it is very

important that those interested in this

proposed action participate by the close

of the 45 day comment period so that

substantive comments and objections

are made available to the Forest Service

at a time when it can meaningfully

consider and respond to them in the

final EIS.

To be most helpful, comments on the

draft EIS should be as specific as

possible and may address the adequacy

of the statement or the merit of the

alternatives discussed. Reviewers may

wish to refer to the Council on

Environmental Quality regulations for

implementing the procedural provisions

of the National Environmental Policy

Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing

these points.

Responsible Official: Robert L.

Schrenk, Forest Supervisor, Kootenai

National Forest, 506 US Highway 2

West, Libby, MT 59923 is the

Responsible Official. I have delegated

the responsibility to prepare the Little

Wolf Fire Salvage and Restoration

Environmental Impact Statement to

Lawrence A. Frobert, District Ranger,

Libby Ranger District. As the

Responsible Official I will decide

which, if any, of the proposed projects

will be implemented. I will document

the decision and reasons for the

decision in the Record of Decision. That

decision will be subject to Forest

Service Appeal Regulations.

Dated: February 13, 1995.

Robert L. Schrenk,

Forest Supervisor,

[FR Doc. 95–4344 Filed 2–22–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410–11–M

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Agency Form Under Review by the

Office of Management and Budget

DOC has submitted to the Office of

Management and Budget (OMB) for

clearance the following proposal for

collection of information under the

provisions of the Paperwork Reduction

Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

Agency: Bureau of Export

Administration.

Title: Encryption Software Marketing

Survey.

Agency Form Number: None.

OMB Approval Number: None.

Type of Request: New Collection ––

prompt review requested.

Burden: 450 hours.

Number of Respondents: 150.

Avg Hours Per Response: 3 hours.

Needs and Uses: Commerce is

surveying encryption software

producers to evaluate the impact of U.S.

export controls on the international

competitiveness of the U.S. industry.

BXA will share this information with

the Interagency Working Group on

Encryption and Telecommunications

Policy. This report will assist the

Administration in determining what, if

any, changes should be made in export

controls affecting encryption software.

Affected Public: Businesses or other

for–profit institutions.

Frequency: One time.

Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.

OMB Desk Officer: Don Arbuckle,

(202) 395–7340.

Copies of the above information

collection proposal can be obtained by

calling or writing Gerald Tache, DOC

Forms Clearance Officer, (202) 482–

3271, Department of Commerce, Room

5327, 14th and Constitution Avenue,

N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230.

Written comments and

recommendations for the proposed

information collection should be sent to

Don Arbuckle, OMB Desk Officer, Room

10202, New Executive Office Building,

Washington, D.C. 20503.

Dated: February 16, 1995

Gerald Tache ́,

Departmental Forms Clearance Officer, Office

of Management and Organization.

[FR Doc. 95–4380 Filed 2–22–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–CW–F

Agency Form Under Review by the

Office of Management and Budget

DOC has submitted to the Office of

Management and Budget (OMB) for

clearance the following proposal for

collection of information under the

provisions of the Paperwork Reduction

Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).

Agency: Bureau of the Census.

Title: Current Population Survey –

June 1995 Marital History and Fertility

Supplement.

Agency Approval Number: 0607–

0610.

Type of Request: Reinstatement, with

change, of a previously approved

collection for which approval has

expired.

Burden: 5,035 hours.

Number of Respondents: 57,000.

Avg Hours Per Response: 5.3 minutes.

Needs and Uses: The Current

Population Survey (CPS) is a survey

conducted in a sample of approximately

57,000 households monthly throughout

the United States. Data on demographic

and labor force characteristics are

collected from a sample of households

which represent the U.S. population.

The Bureau of the Census uses the data

to compile monthly averages of

household size and composition, age,

education, ethnicity, marital status and

various other characteristics at the U.S.

level. The Bureau of Labor Statistics

also uses the data in its monthly

calculations of employment and

unemployment. The basic monthly

questionnaire is periodically

supplemented with additional questions

which address specific needs. The

marital history and fertility supplement

provides data on marital stability and

fertility and childbearing characteristics

of female household members by

various demographic characteristics.

The data collected from this supplement

are used primarily by government and

private analysts to project future

population growth, to analyze child

spacing patterns and marital stability,

and to assist policymakers in making

decisions that are affected by changes in

family size and composition. Questions

on marital history have been asked in

the CPS every 5 years since 1975. We

have collected data on fertility and birth

expectations in the CPS annually since

1971 (with the exception of 1989, 1991,

and 1993).

Affected Public: Individuals or

households.

Frequency: See above.

Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.

OMB Desk Officer: Maria Gonzalez,

(202) 395–7313.

Copies of the above information

collection proposal can be obtained by

calling or writing Gerald Tache ́, DOC

Forms Clearance Officer, (202) 482–

3271, Department of Commerce, room

5312, 14th and Constitution Avenue,

NW, Washington, DC 20230.

Written comments and

recommendations for the proposed

information collection should be sent to

Maria Gonzalez, OMB Desk Officer,

room 10201, New Executive Office

Building, Washington, DC 20503.

Dated: February 16, 1995.

Gerald Tache ́,

Departmental Forms Clearance Officer, Office

of Management and Organization.

[FR Doc. 95–4375 Filed 2–22–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–07–F

Agency Form Under Review by the

Office of Management and Budget

DOC has submitted to the Office of

Management and Budget (OMB) for

clearance the following proposal for

collection of information under the

provisions of the Paperwork Reduction

Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).

Agency: Bureau of the Census.

Title: Advance Monthly Retail Sales

Survey.

Form Number(s): B–104(92).
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 36 / Thursday, February 23, 1995 / Notices 10061

Agency Approval Number: 0607–

0104.

Type of Request: Extension of a

currently approved collection.

Burden: 3,363.

Number of Respondents: 3,363.

Avg Hours Per Response: 5 minutes.

Needs and Uses: The Bureau of the

Census conducts the Advance Monthly

Retail Sales Survey to collect monthly

sales data from a national sample of

retail establishments on a timely basis

in order to provide an early indication

of changes in current retail trade activity

at the United States level. Policy makers

such as the Federal Reserve Board need

to have the most timely estimates in

order to anticipate economic trends and

act accordingly. The Bureau of the

Census releases the advance sales

estimates 9 days after the end of the data

month in a press release called

‘‘Advance Monthly Retail Sales Report.’’

Without these early estimates, the next

available measure of retail sales is the

‘‘preliminary’’ estimate released about

40 days after the data month. Other

users of the advance sales estimates

include the Council of Economic

Advisors, Bureau of Economic Analysis,

Federal Reserve Board, other

government agencies, and businesses.

Affected Public: Businesses or other

for–profit organizations.

Frequency: Monthly.

Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.

OMB Desk Officer: Maria Gonzalez,

(202) 395–7313.

Copies of the above information

collection proposal can be obtained by

calling or writing Gerald Tache ́, DOC

Forms Clearance Officer, (202) 482–

3271, Department of Commerce, room

5312, 14th and Constitution Avenue,

NW, Washington, DC 20230.

Written comments and

recommendations for the proposed

information collection should be sent to

Maria Gonzalez, OMB Desk Officer,

room 10201, New Executive Office

Building, Washington, DC 20503.

Dated: February 16, 1995.

Gerald Tache ́,

Departmental Forms Clearance Officer, Office

of Management and Organization.

[FR Doc. 95–4374 Filed 2–22–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–07–F

International Trade Administration

[A–412–810]

Certain Hot-Rolled Lead and Bismuth

Carbon Steel Products From the

United Kingdom; Preliminary Results

of Antidumping Duty Administrative

Review

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of preliminary results of

antidumping duty administrative

review.

SUMMARY: In response to a request by a

manufacturer/exporter, United

Engineering Steels Limited (UES), the

Department of Commerce (the

Department) is conducting the first

administrative review of the

antidumping duty order on certain hotrolled lead and bismuth carbon steel

products (lead and bismuth steel) from

the United Kingdom (U.K.). The review

covers one manufacturer/exporter, UES,

and entries of the subject merchandise

into the United States during the period

September 28, 1992 through February

28, 1994. We have preliminarily

determined that sales have been made

below the foreign market value (FMV).

If these preliminary results are adopted

in our final results of administrative

review, we will instruct U.S. Customs to

assess antidumping duties equal to the

difference between the United States

price (USP) and the FMV.

Interested parties are invited to

comment on these preliminary results.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 23, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nooshen Amiri or Maureen Flannery,

Office of Antidumping Compliance,

Import Administration, International

Trade Administration, U.S. Department

of Commerce, 14th Street and

Constitution Avenue, N.W.,

Washington, D.C. 20230; telephone:

(202) 482–4733.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

On March 4, 1994, the Department

published in the FEDERAL REGISTER (59

FR 10368) a notice of ‘‘Opportunity to

Request an Administrative Review’’ of

the antidumping duty order on lead and

bismuth steel from the U.K. (58 FR

15324). On March 31, 1994, a

manufacturer/exporter, UES, requested

that we conduct an administrative

review in accordance with section

353.22(a) of the Department’s

regulations (19 CFR 353.22(a)). We

published the notice of initiation of the

antidumping duty administrative review

on April 15, 1994 (59 FR 18099),

covering the period September 28, 1992

through February 28, 1994. The

Department has now conducted the

review in accordance with section 751

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended

(the Act).

Scope of the Review

The products covered by this review

are hot-rolled bars and rods of nonalloy

or other alloy steel, whether or not

descaled, containing by weight 0.03

percent or more of lead or 0.05 percent

of bismuth, in coils or cut lengths, and

in numerous shapes and sizes. Excluded

from the scope of this review are other

alloy steels (as defined by the

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the

United States (HTSUS) Chapter 72, note

1 (f)). except steels classified as other

alloy steels by reason of containing by

weight 0.4 percent or more of lead, or

0.1 percent or more of bismuth,

tellurium, or selenium. Also excluded

are semi-finished steels and flat-rolled

products. Most of the products covered

in this review are provided for under

subheadings 7213.20.00 and

7214.30.00.00 of the HTSUS. Small

quantities of these products may also

enter the United States under the

following HTSUS subheadings:

7213.31.30.00, 60.00; 7213.39.00.30,

00.60, 00.90; 7214.40.00.10, 00.30,

00.50; 7214.50.00.10, 00.30,

00.50;7214.60.00.10, 00.30, 00.50; and

7228.30.80.00. HTSUS subheadings are

provided for convenience and Customs

purposes. The written product

description remains dispositive.

This review covers sales of the subject

merchandise manufactured by UES and

entered into the United States during

the period September 28, 1992 through

February 28, 1994.

United States Price

The Department used purchase price

(PP), as defined in section 772 of the

Act, in calculating USP for UES because

all sales were made directly to unrelated

parties prior to importation into the

United States. USP was based on

packed, delivered prices to customers in

the United States. We made deductions,

where applicable, for cash discounts,

rebates, foreign inland freight, FOB

charges in the U.K., ocean freight,

marine insurance, U.S. Customs duties

and merchandise processing fees, harbor

maintenance fees, brokerage and

handling charges, and U.S. inland

freight charges. We also made an

adjustment for invoice corrections

(billing adjustments) made after

shipment. While UES’s shipments to the

Untied States are transported by a

related carrier, British Steel Shipping,