alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members         
    -  AEE Multimedia 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# PHOTOS ANDVIDEOS

Search

Search

                                - All Images 
                                - Other 
                                - Space Shuttle 

                                - Upload Date
                                - Photo Date
                                - Title

Clear Search29 results found.

-  FIRST 
-   
-   
- 1 (current)
- 2
-   
-   
-  LAST
EXHIBIT 32.1



LOGO



November 12, 2004



Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, NW

Washington, D.C. 20549



|    |  |                                                                                                                               
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Re: |  | Conrad Industries, Inc.                                                                                                       
|    |  | Certification of Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Ladies and Gentlemen:



Conrad Industries, Inc. filed today, via EDGAR, its quarterly report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004. The undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify that the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



This certification is being furnished solely to comply with the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, and is being filed as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q.



Very
truly yours,



/s/ JOHN P. CONRAD, JR.John P. Conrad, Jr.President,Chief Executive OfficerAnd Co-Chairman of the Board/s/ CECIL A. HERNANDEZCecil A. HernandezVice President andChief Financial Officer
**Schwartz
        Levitsky Feldman llp**
 CHARTERED
        ACCOUNTANTS
 LICENSED
        PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 TORONTO
        · MONTREAL





Exhibit
      99.4
















CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUTING FIRM








The
      undersigned, Schwartz Levitsky Feldman llp, hereby consents to the use of our
      name and the use of our opinion dated December 21, 2007 on the financial
      statements of Pacific Copper Corp. (the “Company”) included in its Annual Report
      on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2007 and 2006 and for
      the
      cumulative period ended October 31, 2007.





**“SCHWARTZ
                LEVITSKY FELDMAN LLP”**Toronto,
                Ontario, Canada
            Chartered
                AccountantsJanuary
                25, 2008
            Licensed
                Public
                Accountants














1167
        Caledonia Road
 Toronto,
        Ontario M6A 2X1
 Tel:
        416
        785 5353
 Fax:
        416
        785 5663
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and GraphsUpdated May 3, 2006   |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|

| Level of OASDI Contribution and Benefit Base | Description of Proposed Provision:      Determine the level of the contribution and benefit base such that 90 percent of the earnings would be subject to the payroll tax (phased in 2006-2015).  All earnings subject to the payroll tax would be used in determining benefits. |
|----------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                              |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2005 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map |
#### Simon Bache and another, Appellants, v. Theodore E. Tomlinson, Jr., Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, without costs.

Opinion by

Daniels, J.
#### BRENDA GUINN, by her Next Friend, FRED GUINN v. CLAUDE LAFAYETTE KINCAID, MARSHALL L. KINCAID and BILLY JOE SINGLETON.

(Filed 19 October, 1960.)

Appeal and Error § S—

An order overruling a demurrer for failure of tbe complaint to state a cause of action is not immediately appealable and may be reviewed prior to trial only by writ of *certiorari.*Rules of Practice in tbe Supreme Court 4(a).

Appeal by defendants from *Nettles, Emergency Judge,*June Regular Civil Term, 1960, of Burke.

*229Guinn *v.*Kincaid.

This is a civil action to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained by the plaintiff while *en ventre sa mere,*as the result of a collision between the car owned and operated by the defendant Billy Joe Singleton and a car being driven by the defendant Claude Lafayette Kincaid, on 9 June 1959. At the time of the accident, Louella Guinn, mother of the plaintiff, was riding as a guest passenger in the automobile driven by the defendant Singleton and was violently thrown against the dashboard and windshield of the Singleton car with such force and impact that the plaintiff was seriously and permanently injured.

Each of the defendants filed a demurrer to the complaint on the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action for damages for personal injuries, for that: (1) It appears from the complaint that the minor plaintiff on 9 June 1959, the date of the alleged negligent injury giving rise to the cause of action, was *en ventre sa mere*and was not born until 10 June 1959, the day following the date of the alleged accident and resultant injuries giving rise to this cause of action. (2) That the minor plaintiff has no legal capacity to maintain this action since she was not born until 10 June 1959.

The court below overruled these demurrers. The defendants excepted and appealed.

*Byrd & Byrd for 'plaintiff.*

*James C. Smathers for defendant Singleton; Patton & Ervin for defendants Kincaid.*

Pek CüRiam.

In the case of *Boles v. Graham,*249 N.C. 131, 105 S.E. 2d 296, this Court said: “Appeal does not lie from an order overruling a demurrer in any case except where it is interposed as a matter of right for misjoinder of parties and causes. Prior to trial on the merits, an order overruling a demurrer for failure to state a cause of action can be reviewed only by writ of *certiorari.*Rule 4(a), Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 242 N.C. 766. The defendants are here prematurely.”

This appeal is likewise premature.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                              179811
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         3278
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    220093
<PP&E>                                              487169
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (256240)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      529027
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               485073
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             24251
<OTHER-SE>                                           (8969)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        529027
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                30071
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        30071
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   1260022
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   41894
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (1325248)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (1325248)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (1325248)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.06)






</TABLE>
#### MATTIE SHERLIN, Administratix of the Estate of C. C. SHERLIN, Deceased, v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and W. H. McLAIN.

(Filed 25 September, 1940.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *Warlich, J.,*at January Term, 1940, of BuNCOmbe.

Affirmed.

*W. Harold Sams for plaintiff, appellant.*

*W. T. Joyner and Jones, Ward & Jones for defendants, appellees.*

Per Cubiam.

Plaintiff instituted her action in the general county court of Buncombe County for damages for the wrongful death of her intestate alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendants. *779At tbe close of plaintiff’s evidence motion for judgment of nonsuit was allowed and tbe action dismissed. Upon appeal to tbe Superior Court, tbe rulings of tbe county court were affirmed, and plaintiff appealed to tbis Court.

Tbis case was bere at Fall' Term, 1938, and is reported in 214 N. C., 222, 198 S. E., 640, where tbe facts are stated. It was there held that upon tbe evidence then presented judgment of nonsuit was properly entered.

From an examination of tbe record in tbe present action, it appears that tbe plaintiff’s evidence is substantially tbe same as in tbe former case, and that there is no new element to take it out of tbe rule therein laid down.

Tbe judgment below is

Affirmed.
#### J. M. EDGERTON v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY.

(Filed 28 September, 1927.)

Appeal by defendant from *Harris, J.,*and a jury, at April Term, 1927, of 'Wayne.

No error.

This was an action for damages brought by plaintiff against defendant for negligence in transporting forty-six mules from National Stock Yards, Ill., to Goldsboro, N. C.

The issues submitted to the jury and their answers thereto were as follows: •

“1. Were the mules of the plaintiff injured by the negligence of the defendant railroad company? Answer: Yes.

“2. In what amount, if any, is defendant indebted to plaintiff? Answer: $633.00, with interest.”

*Kenneth G. Boy all and Jack Joyner for plaintiff.*

*Dickinson & Freeman and*W. *B. B. Guión for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

The court below charged the jury clearly and accurately the law of actionable negligence applicable to the facts in the case.

From a careful reading of the record we can find no prejudicial or reversible error.

The action is similar and tried in accordance to the law as set forth in *Farming Co. v. R. R.,*189 N. C., 63. The same principle is set forth in *C. & O. R. R. Co. v. Thompson Mfg. Co.,*270 U. S., 416, 70 L. Ed., 659.

No error.
EXHIBIT  21

Subsidiaries of the Registrant                 Place of Incorporation
------------------------------                 -----------------------
WPI Electronics, Inc.                          New Hampshire
WPI Instruments, Inc.                          New Hampshire
WPI Magnetec, Inc.                             New Hampshire
WPI Power Systems, Inc.                        New Hampshire
WPI Oyster Termiflex, Inc.                     New Hampshire
WPI Termiflex International Sales, Inc.        Massachusetts
WPI DecisionKey, Inc.                          New Hampshire
WPI Micro Palm,  Inc.                          New Hampshire
WPI Micro Processor Systems, Inc.              New Hampshire
WPI Oyster Termiflex Limited                   England and Wales
WPI Oyster Terminals, Inc.                     New Hampshire
WPI UK Holding, Inc.                           New Hampshire
WPI UK Holding II, Inc.                        New Hampshire
WPI Group (U.K.)                               England and Wales
WPI Group International Sales Limited          Barbados
WPI Husky Technology, Inc.                     Florida
WPI Husky Technology Limited                   England and Wales
WPI Husky Technology GmbH                      Germany

<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9678]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4149]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket Nos. RP95-53-000]


NorAm Gas Transmission Co.; Notice of Technical Conference

February 15, 1995.
    In the Commission's order issued December 23, 1994, the Commission 
held that the filing in the above captioned proceeding raises issues 
that should be addressed in a technical conference.
    Take notice that the technical conference will be held on Tuesday, 
February 28, 1995, at 2 p.m., in a room to be designated at the offices 
of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 810 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426. All interested parties and Staff are permitted to 
attend.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-4149 Filed 2-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
FILED: September 12, 2023

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

___________________

No. 21-2207

(3:19-cv-00695-GCM-DCK)

___________________

JODY ROSE, as Administratrix of the Estate of Kyree Devon Holman

 Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

PSA AIRLINES, INC.; PSA AIRLINES, INC. GROUP BENEFIT PLAN; UMR, INC.; 

QUANTUM HEALTH, INC., a/k/a MyQHealth by Quantum; MCMC, LLC

 Defendants - Appellees

and

PSA AIRLINES GROUP INSURANCE PLAN; PSA AIRLINES GROUP HEALTH 

BENEFIT PLAN; PSA AIRLINES PLAN B EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN; PSA 

AIRLINES SHARED SERVICES ORG.

 Defendants

___________________

O R D E R

___________________

The court amends its opinion filed September 11, 2023, as follows:

On page 18, line 8, the phrase “excusive-jurisdiction” is corrected to “exclusivejurisdiction.”

For the Court--By Direction

/s/ Nwamaka Anowi, Clerk

USCA4 Appeal: 21-2207 Doc: 71 Filed: 09/12/2023 Pg: 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 15, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 8562-8563]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3699]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 8563]]

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

34 CFR Part 99


Family Educational Rights and Privacy

AGENCY: Department of Education.

ACTION: Final regulations; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On January 17, 1995 (60 FR 3464), the Secretary of Education 
published in the Federal Register final regulations implementing the 
Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act. This document corrects an 
error that was made in the effective date.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ellen Campbell, Family Policy Compliance Office, Office of Management, 
U.S. Department of Education, 600 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, 
DC 20202-4605. Telephone (202) 260-3887. Individuals who use a 
telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 
p.m., Eastern time, Monday through Friday.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The final regulations published on January 
17 stated that the effective date was 45 days from the date of 
publication in the Federal Register subject to certain conditions. This 
document corrects the effective date to read ``These regulations take 
effect on February 16, 1995.''

    Dated: February 8, 1995.
Rodney McCowan,
Assistant Secretary, Office of Management.
[FR Doc. 95-3699 Filed 2-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable) | Description of Proposed Provision:      Apply 3 percent payroll tax rate on earnings over $400,000 in 2017, with the $400,000 threshold wage-indexed after 2017.  Give proportional benefit credit for additional earnings in AIME for benefit computation. |
|-------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                           |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2009 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified May 14, 2010 |
EXHIBIT 32

                           CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of remote knowledge,
inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Randy S.
Bayne, Chief Executive Officer and Henry Houston, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, each do hereby certify, pursuant to and solely for the purpose of 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of his knowledge and belief, that:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
     and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/  Randy S. Bayne                              August 16, 2004
-----------------------------
     Randy S. Bayne
     Chief Executive Officer


/s/  Henry Houston                               August 16, 2004
-----------------------------
     Henry Houston
     Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DORMEN LISBY,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 235 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 11th day of October, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
No. 1231, Misc.

#### Strickland *v.*Myers, Correctional Superintendent.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Certiorari denied.
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable) | Description of Proposed Provision:      Raise payroll tax rates (for employees and employers combined) by 2.2 percentage points in 2010 and later. |
|-------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                           |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2009 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified August 31, 2009 |