alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3546 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3546

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the amendments 
 made to reporting of third party network transactions by the American 
                        Rescue Plan Act of 2021.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 1, 2022

Mr. Hagerty (for himself, Mr. Tillis, Ms. Lummis, Ms. Ernst, Mr. Cruz, 
Mr. Cramer, Mr. Braun, Mr. Rubio, and Mr. Scott of Florida) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                               on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the amendments 
 made to reporting of third party network transactions by the American 
                        Rescue Plan Act of 2021.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop the Nosy Obsession with Online 
Payments Act of 2022'' or the ``SNOOP Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF MODIFICATION OF EXCEPTIONS FOR REPORTING OF THIRD 
              PARTY NETWORK TRANSACTIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 6050W(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended to read as follows:
    ``(e) Exception for De Minimis Payments by Third Party Settlement 
Organizations.--A third party settlement organization shall be required 
to report any information under subsection (a) with respect to third 
party network transactions of any participating payee only if--
            ``(1) the amount which would otherwise be reported under 
        subsection (a)(2) with respect to such transactions exceeds 
        $20,000, and
            ``(2) the aggregate number of such transactions exceeds 
        200.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 6050W(c)(3) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``described in subsection 
(d)(3)(A)(iii)''.
    (c) Effective Date.--
            (1) In general.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
        apply to returns for calendar years beginning after December 
        31, 2021.
            (2) Clarification.--The amendment made by subsection (b) 
        shall apply to transactions after the date of the enactment of 
        the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Jason Ramjattansingh v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-15-01089-CR

Trial court case number: 2019635

Trial court: County Criminal Court at Law No. 8 of Harris County

Appellant has filed a motion to supplement the record with two subpoenas filed by the 

State to secure the attendance of Joshua Wilson, a tow truck driver. 

Rule 34.5 allows a party to request supplementation of the clerk’s record. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 34.5(c)(1). Because appellant may request supplementation of the clerk’s record from 

the District Clerk, we dismiss appellant’s motion as moot.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

 Acting individually 

Date: July 28, 2016
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Nittany  Financial  Corp.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"),  we, David
Z. Richards, President, and Gary M. Bradley, Vice President and Chief Accounting
Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/ David Z. Richards                /s/ Gary M. Bradley
--------------------------------     -------------------------------------------
David Z. Richards                    Gary M. Bradley
President and CEO                    Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer



August 13, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9671]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4143]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Air Force


USAF Scientific Advisory Board; Meeting

    The USAF Scientific Advisory Board's Test Center Advisory Groups 
will meet on 1-2 March 1995 at the Air Force Operational Test and 
Evaluation Center (AFOTEC), Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico from 
8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    The purpose of the meeting is to receive briefings and review 
AFOTEC operational test plans for the B-1 Bomber.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with Section 
552b of Title 5, United States Code, specifically subparagraphs (1) and 
(4) thereof.
    For further information, contact the Scientific Advisory Board 
Secretariat at (703) 697-8404.
Patsy J. Conner,
Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-4143 Filed 2-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3910-01-M
OURTCF

CtURr Cr

i-"*1

Qr.fl nomberd causa oh o^tal &3nd

frp rulimA^er4Dnatprovide nuptial

4v\a\

4Ve inlTaily as well as

fvDM any

vT&

-ftr an

s. !\J. t.

L.

T-V'5

Tn

tn

of

C\

T-V i6

an

le

ho

LJ5l.

XrA
er 4-he fefyiAvewerks c*£* Rule. 34.

llorJ eeelfH rvu-4rial -tawmupk anJ rviDfeon hearings ovs VJu^fee, -ki pursue wvecril rgful and adiequfcle o.t-V' fi am d-VTnov crp rjoKce perhnx rirTWU 4Tl hasn

ordeved-to nrAec

irVve CcuHs 4\tq4 CR lqiU lecxc\ htA CO H-\i2 CcnWru 4o perjuru

tt, ^^v pp

5vfir\ci (WA^jpDr4€^4\ie4ranf£japfe(^ as ujeUa^-ih^ nar^Vr\al4Uci4erckdi as sudn ^^

^peUctk.TVocedure 'bo. ICOC6) ar\d cor\7lfye

a4nie art! c£>ae<d- co^f csP AA^e.

coctA?nh4bbe.WJ
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 6289** 

MARK I. BEDFORD , Petitioner

– Appellee ,
v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director VDOC , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke
. Michael F. Urbanski , District Judge. ( 7:12

- cv - 00411

- MFU

- RSB )

Submitted : July 30, 2013 Decided: August 5, 2013

Before WYNN, DIAZ, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Mark Ivan Bedford, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Mark Ivan Bedford seeks to appeal the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c) (1) (A) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard b y demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the dist rict court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85.
We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bedford has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSE D
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA Ex Rel. J. C. PHELPS et al. v. D. C. HICKS et al.

(Filed 5 November, 1947.)

Appeal by plaintiffs from *Nimocks, J.,*in Chambers at Louisburg, 22 September, 1947. From EbaNKLIN.

Civil action in the name of the State on relation of citizens of Franklin County to padlock premises used in operation of “Town Liquor Control Store” and to enjoin its maintenance as a nuisance.

Pursuant to Chap. 911, Session Laws of 1947, a “Town Liquor Control Store” in the Town of Eranklinton was authorized by vote of the people, and is now being operated in a building owned or managed by D. C. Hicks and leased by him to the “Town of Eranklinton Board of Alcoholic Control” for such purposes.

It is alleged that the Act of Assembly under which the defendants have established, and are now operating, the Town Liquor Control Store in question is unconstitutional and all proceedings thereunder are perforce illegal and void. Hence, the plaintiffs invoke the provisions of Gr. S., 19-1 and 19-2, to have the store declared an offense against public morals, *i.e.,*a nuisance, and its operation as such abated.

From judgment dismissing the action with costs, the plaintiffs appeal, assigning errors.

(7. *M. Beam and Hill Yarborough for plaintiffs, appellants.*

*H. 0. Kearney for defendants, Cheatham, Hicks, Parker, Bose, and May, appellees.*

*159Stacy, C. J.

The decision here is controlled by what is said in No. 451, *State ex rel. Amick v. Lancaster, ante,*157. That case dealt with a “Town Liquor Control Store” in Louisburg; this one with a similar store in Franklinton. There is no difference in principle between the two cases.

The judgment of dismissal in the present case will be also upheld.

Affirmed.
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov |  | **Search**  |
|------------------------|--|------------------|

| Office of the Chief Actuary | Provisions That Could Change the Social Security ProgramUpdated July 3, 2008   |
|-----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**Category of Change to the Social Security Program**A: Cost-of-Living AdjustmentB: Level of Monthly Benefits (PIA)C: Retirement AgeD: Payroll Tax RatesE: OASDI Contribution and Benefit BaseF: Coverage of EmploymentG: Trust Fund Investment in EquitiesH: Taxation of BenefitsI: Individual Accounts Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site MapNeed Larger Text?
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 5 (Monday, January 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2425-2426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-377]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Public Information Collection Requirements Submitted to OMB for 
Review

December 30, 1994.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Public Law 96-511. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-0002.
    Form Number: IRS Form CT-2.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Employee Representative's Quarterly Railroad Tax Return.
    Description: Employee representatives file Form CT-2 quarterly to 
report compensation on which railroad retirement taxes are due. IRS 
uses this information to insure that employee representatives have paid 
the correct tax. Form CT-2 also transmits the tax payment.
    Respondents: Individuals or households.
    Estimated Number of Respondents/Recordkeepers: 28.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent/Recordkeeper:

                                                                        
                                                                        
                                                                        
Recordkeeping.........................................  26 min.         
Learning about the law or the form....................  13 min.         
Preparing the form....................................  31 min.         
Copying, assembling, and sending the form to the IRS..  17 min.         
                                                                        

    Frequency of Response: Quarterly.
    Estimated Total Reporting/Recordkeeping Burden: 164 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear (202) 622-3869, Internal Revenue 
Service, Room 5571, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Milo Sunderhauf (202) 395-7340, Office of Management 
and Budget, Room 10226, New [[Page 2426]] Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-377 Filed 1-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.80
                    Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement

     This Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement is entered into as of this 3rd
day of December 1999, by and between Vertel Corporation, a California
corporation (the "Company") and Cyrus Irani, an individual ("Officer"), with
respect to the following facts:

           A.   On January 12, 1999, the Company and Officer entered into a
                written Employment Agreement (the "Employment Agreement").

           B.   On December 3, 1999, the Company's Compensation Committee
                approved an amendment to Officer's Employment Agreement as
                hereinafter set forth.

     Now, therefore, in consideration of the foregoing and intending to be
mutually bound, the parties hereto agree as follows:

           1.   Section 5(b)(ii)(A) of the Employment Agreement shall be amended
           to read as follows:

           "Salary Continuance.  If Officer experiences an Involuntary
            ------------------
           Termination before the second year anniversary of the date of this
           Agreement, Officer will be entitled to receive an amount equal to his
           or her regular monthly salary (subject to any applicable tax
           withholding) as of the time of termination for twelve (12) months
           following such termination (the "Original Term Severance Period"). If
                                            ------------------------------
           Officer experiences an Involuntary Termination during any period of
           the Agreement following the second year anniversary of the date of
           this Agreement . . . ."

The remainder of such paragraph shall remain as currently written in the
Employment Agreement.

           2.   All other terms and conditions of the Agreement not expressly
                amended herein shall remain in full force and effect without any
                change

                           [Signature Page Follows]
<PAGE>

     The parties have executed this Agreement the date first written above.


                           VERTEL CORPORATION


                           By:
                              -----------------------------------------------
                           Bruce W. Brown, President and Chief Executive Officer

                           Address:    21300 Victory Blvd., #1200
                                       Woodland Hills, CA 91367


                           NAME:       Cyrus Irani

                           Signature:
                                      ----------------------------------

                           Address:
                                       --------------------------
                                       --------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 36 (Thursday, February 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 10068]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4462]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE


Civilian Community Corps Advisory Board Meeting

AGENCY: Corporation for National Community Service.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Corporation for National and Community Service, gives 
notice under Public Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act), that 
it will hold a meeting of the Civilian Community Corps (CCC) Advisory 
Board. The board advises the Director of the CCC concerning the 
administration of the program and assists in the development and 
administration of the Corps. This meeting of the Board will discuss the 
progress to date and future direction of the program. The meeting will 
be open to the public up to the seating capacity of the room.

DATES: March 7, 1995, 6:00pm-9:00pm; March 8, 1995, 9:00 am-5:00pm.

ADDRESSES: Crystal City Doubletree Hotel, Arlington, VA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To assure adequate accommodation, 
contact Ms. Carla Sims, Protocol Officer, CCC at 1201 New York Avenue, 
NW., Washington, DC 20525; (202) 606-5000 ext. 179 or (202) 606-5000 
(TDD) prior to March 7, 1995.
Donald L. Scott,
Director, NCCC.
[FR Doc. 95-4462 Filed 2-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6050-28-M
Exhibit 99.1

       CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Frederick A. Cary and Donald W. Raymond, Jr. hereby certify that:

1. They are the Chief Executive Officer and chief financial officer,
respectively, of Path 1 Network Technologies Inc.

2.  The Form 10-Q report of Path 1 Network Technologies Inc. that this
certification accompanies fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

3. The information contained in the Form 10-Q report of Path 1 Network
Technologies Inc. that this certification accompanies fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Path 1
Network Technologies Inc.

Dated:  August 14, 2002
                                            /s/ Frederick A. Cary
                                            --------------------------
                                            Frederick A. Cary

                                            /s/ Donald W. Raymond, Jr.
                                            --------------------------
                                            Donald W. Raymond, Jr.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 4 (Friday, January 6, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 2175]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-441]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


Commodity Futures Trading Commission

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Tuesday, January 10, 1995.

PLACE: 2033 K St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 8th Floor Hearing Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Enforcement Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-254-6314.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 95-441 Filed 1-4-95; 2:43 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 January 18, 2007

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 06-15081

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket Nos. 

05-00345-CV-F-S & 03-12288-WRS

In Re: CULVERHOUSE, INC., 

d.b.a. Alabama Trucking, 

Debtor. 

__________________________________________________________________ 

CULVERHOUSE, INC., 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Alabama

_________________________

(January 18, 2007)

Before TJOFLAT, CARNES and HULL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
2

The sole issue in this bankruptcy appeal is whether Alabama’s motor vehicle

excise tax applies to vehicles that an Alabama company exerts control over but

which are located and first used in another state. It is an issue of Alabama law. In

Fleming Foods of Alabama, Inc. v. Department of Revenue, 648 So. 2d 577 (Ala.

1994), the Alabama Supreme Court stated that: “a use tax is not a tax on revenues

generated from carrying on interstate business . . . but is an excise tax imposed

upon the privilege of storing, using, or otherwise consuming tangible personal

property purchased at retail outside the state and domiciled in the state.” Id. at 579

(emphasis added). Given the plain meaning of those words, we agree with the

district court that the tax is not applicable to the vehicles at issue in this case. The

arguments of the Department of Revenue to the contrary are adequately answered

in the district court’s thorough and well-reasoned memorandum opinion and order. 

Culverhouse, Inc. v. Ala. Dep’t of Revenue (In re Culverhouse, Inc.), ___ F. Supp.

2d ___, 2006 WL 2456275 (M.D. Ala. Aug. 22, 2006).

AFFIRMED.
This memorandum opinion was not selected for pub lication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restricti ons on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations fr om the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 JAMES MICHAEL GALLEGOS, 2 Plaintiff-Appellant, 3

v. NO. 32,857 4 GEO GROUP, INC., GUADALUPE 5 COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, 6 TIM HATCH, ERASMO BRAVO, JOHN W. 7 BEARD, JOHNNY JONSON, ALSONSO 8 GARCIA, JOE GARCIA, JANIE YEARLY, 9 REBECCA HATCH, P. ARAGON, P. CHAVEZ, 10 DINAH SANDOVAL, TRUDY JIM, J. VIGIL, 11 BRENDA COPELAND, and JUNNIE DAVIS, 12 in their individual and official capacities, et. al., 13 Defendants-Appellees. 14

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF GUADALUPE COUNTY 15 Abigail Aragon, District Judge 16 James Michael Gallegos 17 Rancho de Taos, NM 18 Pro Se Appellant 19 Yenson, Allen & Wosick, P.C. 20 Megan L. Jahner 21 Patrick D. Allen 222 Albuquerque, NM 1 for Appellees 2

MEMORANDUM OPINION 3 GARCIA, Judge. 4 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reason stated in the notice of 5 proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, 6 and the time for doing so has expired. 7 Affirmed. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9

10 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge 11

WE CONCUR: 12

13 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge 14

15 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge 163