alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
amendment to the Annual Report of WisdomTree Investments, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on the date hereof (the
Report), we, Jonathan L. Steinberg, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Amit Muni, Executive Vice PresidentFinance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our knowledge, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certification is being furnished and not filed, and shall not be incorporated into any documents for any
purpose, under the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement require by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.



|    |  |                                                      
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Jonathan Steinberg                               
|    |  | Jonathan Steinberg                                   
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)



|    |  |                                                                                           
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Amit Muni                                                                             
|    |  | Amit Muni                                                                                 
|    |  | Executive Vice PresidentFinance and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

April 26, 2013
JOHN MCKAY

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 5383

_____________ ________________/

Opinion filed February 12, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Gadsden County

. Jonathan E. Sjostrom , Judge

.

John McKay, pro se

, Appellant.

No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, CLARK , and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 9, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 6878]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02535]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; ``Comprehensive Resources for HIV 
Microbicides and Biomedical Prevention (N01)''.
    Date: February 23, 2016.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Room 3F100, 5601 Fishers 
Lane, Rockville, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Jay R Radke, Ph.D., AIDS Review Branch, 
Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, Room 
#3G11B, National Institutes of Health, NIAID, 5601 Fishers Lane MSC-
9823, Bethesda, MD 20892-9823, (240) 669-5046, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5a303b2374283b3e313f1a343332743d352c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dfb5bea6f1adbebbb4ba9fb1b6b7f1b8b0a9">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 4, 2016.
Natasha M. Copeland,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-02535 Filed 2-8-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### STATE *v.*VERNON R. WORLEY.

(Filed 1 May, 1957.)

1. Appeal and Error § 19—

Exceptions must be brought forward and assigned as error. Rule of Practice in the Supreme Court No. 19(3).

2. Same—

Assignments of error not supported by exceptions therein noted cannot be considered.

Appeal by defendant from *Hobgood, J.,*December Mixed Term 1956 Of JOHNSTON.

The defendant was originally tried and convicted upon a warrant returnable to the Recorder’s Court of Johnston County charging him with the unlawful and willful operation of a motor vehicle on the public highways of the State in a reckless and careless manner and while under the influence of intoxicants or narcotics, this being his second offense, driving after license had been revoked, etc.

From judgment rendered, the defendant appealed to the Superior Court where he was tried *de novo*on the original warrant. The jury returned a verdict of guilty as charged, driving under the influence and careless and reckless driving.

From the judgment imposed on the verdict, the defendant appeals, assigning error.

*Attorney-General Patton and Assistant Attorney-General McGal-liard for the State.*

*E. Reamuel Temple for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

The record contains numerous exceptions. However, they have not been brought forward and assigned as error, as required by Rule 19, Section 3 of the Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court. 221 N.C. 554; *Investment Co. v. Chemicals Laboratory,*233 N.C. 294, 63 S.E. 2d 637.

The appellant does have what purports to be assignments of error, but none of them is supported by an exception. This Court will not search through a record in an effort to determine whether or not it contains an exception or exceptions that will sustain assignments of error. *Cecil v. Lumber Co.,*197 N.C. 81, 147 S.E. 735.

We have examined the record. The verdict supports the judgment and no error of law appears on the face of the record. Judgment affirmed.

Appeal dismissed.
Ex-99.2 a)

               Management Assertion Regarding Compliance With the
                       Uniform Single Attestation Program
                for Mortgage Bankers Minimum Servicing Standards

As of and for the year ended June 30, 2000, Liberty Lending Services, Inc.,
(Liberty Lending) has complied in all material respects with the minimum
servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's
Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers. As of and for this same
period, Liberty Lending had in effect a fidelity bond policy for $6,000,000 and
an errors and omissions policy for $6,000,000.




                                            /s/ Suzan D. Kranjc
                                            --------------------------------
                                            Suzan D. Kranjc
                                            Senior Vice President -- Finance


                                            9/15/00
                                            --------------------------------
                                            Date
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 37 (Friday, February 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10407-10408]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4583]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION
[Docket No. AB-12 (Sub-No. 181X)]


Southern Pacific Transportation Company--Abandonment Exemption--
in Santa Clara County, CA

AGENCY: Interstate Commerce Commission.

ACTION: Notice of exemption.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission exempts from the prior approval requirements of 
49 U.S.C. 10903-10904 the Southern Pacific Transportation Company's 
abandonment of a 1.45-mile line of railroad, known as the Moffett Drill 
Track, which extends from milepost 36.89, near the Mountain View rail 
station at Mountain View, CA, to approximately milepost 38.34, near the 
Moffett Federal Airfield (formerly the Moffett Field Naval Air Station) 
in Santa Clara County, CA. The transaction also is exempted from the 
offer of financial assistance and public use procedures of 49 U.S.C. 
10905 and 10906, respectively.

DATES: This exemption will be effective on February 24, 1995. Petitions 
to reopen must be filed by March 21, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Send pleadings referring to Docket No. AB-12 (Sub-No. 181X) 
to: (1) Office of the Secretary, Case Control Branch, Interstate 
Commerce Commission, 1201 Constitution Ave. [[Page 10408]] NW., 
Washington, DC 20423, and (2) petitioner's representative: Louis E. 
Gitomer, 1101 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Suite 1035, Washington, DC 20004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph H. Dettmar, (202) 927-5660. 
[TDD for the hearing impaired: (202) 927-5721.]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Commission's decision. To purchase a copy of the full decision, write 
to, call, or pick up in person from: Dynamic Concepts, Inc., Room 2229, 
Interstate Commerce Commission Building, 1201 Constitution Ave. NW., 
Washington, DC 20423. Telephone: (202) 289-4357/4359. [Assistance for 
the hearing impaired is available through TDD services (202) 927-5721.]

    Decided: February 7, 1995.

    By the Commission, Chairman McDonald, Vice Chairman Morgan, and 
Commissioners Simmons and Owen.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-4583 Filed 2-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7035-01-P
**Exhibit 10.3**

 

**AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO**

**EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**

 

This Amendment No. 1 toEmployment Agreement (this “First Amendment”), by and between Conrad Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Kenneth G. Myers, Jr. (“Executive”) is hereby entered into effective as of September 15,2003. 

 

**W I T N E S S E T H:**

 

**WHEREAS**, the Company and Executive have entered into that certainEmployment Agreement, dated as of August 13, 2001 (the “Employment Agreement”); and 

 

**WHEREAS**, the Company and Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement as set forth herein; 

 

**NOW, THEREFORE**, for and in consideration of the continued employment of Executive by the Company and the payment of salary and other compensationto Executive by the Company, the parties hereto agree as follows: 

 

**Section 1.**    Except as expressly amended hereby, all of the terms and provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. Capitalized terms used herein, unless otherwise defined herein,shall have the meaning given to them in the Employment Agreement. 

 

**Section 2.**    The first sentence of paragraph 2(a) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows: 

 

The base salary payable to Executive during the term of his 

employment hereunder shall be $218,500 per year, payable in 

accordance with the Company’s payroll procedures for executives, 

but not less frequently thanmonthly. 

 

*[signatures appear on the following page]*

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this First Amendment to be duly executed and signed asof the date indicated above. 

 

CONRAD INDUSTRIES, INC.
By: /s/ MICHAEL J. HARRIS   
Michael J. Harris

Chairman, Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Conrad Industries, Inc.

 

EXECUTIVE
/s/ KENNETH G. MYERS, JR.Kenneth G. Myers, Jr.
 

Amendment No. 1to Employment Agreement 

Kenneth G. Myers, Jr. 

Page 2
#### In the Matter of the Custody of FRANCES EARLE BRINSON, JOHNNY EDWARD BRINSON, and JOYCE ANITA BRINSON.

(No. 393,

Fall Term, 1951)

Appeal by Petitioner (Edna Earl Brinson) from *Frizzelle, J.,*3 July, 1951, Lenoir Superior Court. From Lenolr County.

The purpose of the petition of *habeas corpus*by a divorced parent being declared to be to relieve her children from alleged restraint when committed by the court to the Junior Order Children’s Home, no appeal lies from the order denying petition, and the attempted appeal therefrom is dismissed. *In re Thompson,*228 N.C. 74; *In re Holley,*154 N.C. 163.

This 17 October, 1951.

YaleNTINE, J., for the Court.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5202 Filed: 12/26/19 Entered: 12/26/19 07:41:28 Page 1 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5202 Filed: 12/26/19 Entered: 12/26/19 07:41:28 Page 2 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5202 Filed: 12/26/19 Entered: 12/26/19 07:41:28 Page 3 of

3
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICEROF PREMIERE GLOBAL SERVICES, INC.PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Premiere Global Services, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Michael E. Havener, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

| (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                 |
| (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|     | /s/ Michael E. Havener                                                                   |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|               | Michael E. HavenerChief Financial OfficerPremiere Global Services, Inc.February 27, 2009 |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 32 (Thursday, February 16, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9054]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3939]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Public Law 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting 
of the Expansion Arts Advisory Panel (Services to the Field Section) to 
the National Council on the Arts will be held on March 9, 1995. The 
panel will meet from 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. in Room 730, at the Nancy 
Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20506.
    Portions of this meeting will be open to the public from 9:00 a.m. 
to 9:45 a.m. for opening remarks and a general program overview and 
from 3:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. for a policy discussion.
    The remaining portion of this meeting from 9:45 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. 
is for the purpose of panel review, discussion, evaluation, and 
recommendation on applications for financial assistance under the 
National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, as 
amended, including information given in confidence to the agency by 
grant applicants. In accordance with the determination of the Chairman 
of February 8, 1994, this session will be closed to the public pursuant 
to subsection (c)(4), (6) and (9)(B) of section 552b of Title 5, United 
States Code.
    Any person may observe meetings, or portions thereof, of advisory 
panels which are open to the public, and may be permitted to 
participate in the panel's discussions at the discretion of the Panel 
chairman and with the approval of the full-time Federal employee in 
attendance.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact the Office of Special Constituencies, National Endowment for 
the Arts, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C., 20506, 202/
682-5532, TTY 202/682-5496, at least seven (7) days prior to the 
meeting.
    Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained 
from Ms. Yvonne M. Sabine, Committee Management Officer, National 
Endowment for the Arts, Washington, D.C., 20506, or call 202/682-5433.

    Dated: February 13, 1995.
Yvonne M. Sabine,
Director, Office of Council and Panel Operations, National Endowment 
for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 95-3939 Filed 2-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jacoup Hatcher, Appellant.

[772 NYS2d 826]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Dominic Massaro, J.), rendered May 2, 2002, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of four counts of criminal contempt in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 4 to 8 years, and order, same court and Justice, entered on or about June 19, 2002, which denied defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate the judgment, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant’s mistrial motion, made on the ground that the prosecutor had violated the trial court’s *Sandoval (People v Sandoval,*34 NY2d 371 [1974]) ruling. Defendant’s direct testimony tended to assert his innocence as to his prior criminal contempt conviction, and thus opened the door to cross-examination concerning the facts leading up to that conviction *(see People v Fardan,*82 NY2d 638, 646 [1993]). The scope of cross-examination was consistent with the court’s specific warning to defendant, given at the end of the *Sandoval*proceeding, concerning the circumstances under which the court might modify its original ruling, and the effect of such a modification.

*219The court correctly denied defendant’s motion to vacate judgment alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. The court properly found that the trial record was sufficient to permit review of this issue on direct appeal *(see*CPL 440.10 [2] [b]). We note that the circumstances of trial counsel’s decision not to call certain witnesses are adequately developed on the record. Upon our review of the entire trial record, we conclude that counsel provided effective assistance *(see People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708, 713-714 [1998]; *see also Strickland v*Washington, 466 US 668 [1984]).

Defendant’s remaining contentions, including his argument that certain conduct by the prosecutor violated the State Constitution, are unpreserved *(see People v Robinson,*74 NY2d 773, 775 [1989], *cert denied*493 US 966 [1989]; *People v Hamlin,*71 NY2d 750, 762 [1988]), and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Saxe, Lerner and Marlow, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 37 (Friday, February 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10408-10409]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4567]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Petroleum Products Stewardship Council

    Notice is hereby given that, on December 30, 1994, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the Petroleum Products 
Stewardship Council (``the Council'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties and (2) the 
nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for 
the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of 
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties are: 
BP America, Inc., Cleveland, OH; Texaco, Inc., Beacon, NY; Mobil Oil 
Corporation, Princeton, [[Page 10409]] NJ; Chevron, Richmond, CA; Amoco 
Corporation, Chicago, IL; Unocal Corporation, Los Angeles, CA; 
Atlantic-Richfield Corporation, Los Angeles, CA.
    The objective of the venture is to evaluate toxicological testing 
needs for North American refinery products; to sponsor or conduct such 
toxicological testing as appropriate; to share results of such testing 
with the Members of the Council in order to promote product stewardship 
and to enhance their understanding of those products or product 
blending streams; to cooperate with other national and international 
organizations having similar objectives; and to comply with all 
applicable government laws and regulations regarding the reporting of 
test data or other applicable provisions.
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 95-4567 Filed 2-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Retirement Age | Description of Proposed Provision:      Shorten the hiatus in the normal retirement age (speed up the increase to age 67). That is, increase the NRA by 2 months per year for those attaining age 62 in 2012 through 2017, five years earlier than in current law, which would increase the NRA 2 months per year for those reaching age 62 in 2017 through 2022. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2009 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified November 16, 2009 |