alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Year Cost Rate

Income 

Rate

Annual 

Balance

2008 11.20 12.77 1.57 359

2009 11.26 12.88 1.62 369

2010 11.37 12.92 1.55 379

2011 11.53 12.96 1.43 388

2012 11.76 13.02 1.26 394

2013 12.03 13.08 1.05 398

2014 12.32 13.12 0.81 400

2015 12.61 13.17 0.56 400

2016 12.92 13.23 0.30 398

2017 13.24 13.27 0.04 395

2018 13.53 13.32 -0.22 391

2019 13.83 13.36 -0.47 385

2020 14.13 13.40 -0.74 378

2021 14.42 13.43 -0.99 370

2022 14.68 13.46 -1.23 362

2023 14.95 13.48 -1.47 352

2024 15.19 13.50 -1.69 342

2025 15.43 13.52 -1.92 330

2026 15.65 13.53 -2.12 318

2027 15.86 13.54 -2.32 305

2028 16.06 13.55 -2.52 291

2029 16.25 13.55 -2.69 277

2030 16.41 13.55 -2.85 262

2031 16.54 13.55 -2.99 246

2032 16.66 13.55 -3.10 230

2033 16.74 13.55 -3.19 213

2034 16.80 13.55 -3.25 197

2035 16.84 13.54 -3.30 180

2036 16.87 13.53 -3.33 162

2037 16.88 13.53 -3.35 145

2038 16.87 13.52 -3.35 127

2039 16.85 13.51 -3.34 109

2040 16.81 13.50 -3.31 91

2041 16.78 13.49 -3.28 73

2042 16.74 13.48 -3.25 55

2043 16.70 13.48 -3.22 37

2044 16.66 13.47 -3.19 18

2045 16.62 13.46 -3.16 ----

2046 16.59 13.46 -3.14 ----

2047 16.57 13.45 -3.12 ----

2048 16.55 13.44 -3.10 ----

2049 16.53 13.44 -3.09 ----

2050 16.52 13.44 -3.08 ----

2051 16.52 13.43 -3.09 ----

2052 16.52 13.43 -3.09 ----

2053 16.53 13.43 -3.10 ----

2054 16.55 13.43 -3.12 ----

2055 16.57 13.43 -3.14 ----

2056 16.59 13.43 -3.16 ----

2057 16.61 13.43 -3.19 ----

2058 16.64 13.43 -3.21 ----

2059 16.66 13.43 -3.24 ----

2060 16.69 13.43 -3.26 ----

2061 16.71 13.43 -3.29 ----

2062 16.74 13.43 -3.31 ----

2063 16.77 13.43 -3.34 ----

2064 16.79 13.43 -3.36 ----

2065 16.82 13.43 -3.39 ----

Trust Fund 

Ratio 

1-1-year

Detailed Single Year Tables

Category of Change: Taxation of Benefits

Proposed Provision: Tax Social Security benefits in a manner similar to private pension income 

beginning in 2009. Phase out the lower-income thresholds during 2009-2028.

Expressed as a percentage of taxable payrol
2066 16.85 13.43 -3.42 ----

2067 16.88 13.43 -3.45 ----

2068 16.92 13.43 -3.48 ----

2069 16.95 13.43 -3.52 ----

2070 16.99 13.43 -3.55 ----

2071 17.03 13.44 -3.59 ----

2072 17.06 13.44 -3.63 ----

2073 17.10 13.44 -3.66 ----

2074 17.14 13.44 -3.70 ----

2075 17.18 13.44 -3.74 ----

2076 17.23 13.44 -3.78 ----

2077 17.27 13.45 -3.82 ----

2078 17.31 13.45 -3.86 ----

2079 17.36 13.45 -3.91 ----

2080 17.40 13.45 -3.95 ----

2081 17.45 13.46 -3.99 ----

2082 17.50 13.46 -4.04 ----

2083 17.54 13.46 -4.08 ----

2084 17.59 13.46 -4.12 ----

2085 17.63 13.47 -4.17 ----

Summarized Rates: OASDI

2008 Cost Rate Income Rate

Actuarial 

Balance

-2082 15.63% 14.18% -1.46% 0.24%

Office of the Chief Actuary, Social Security

Estimates based on Intermediate Assumptions of the 2008 Trustees Report

Change in 

Actuarial Balance

November 13, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 40 (Wednesday, March 1, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 11165]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4980]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the renewal of the Aviation 
Rulemaking Advisory Committee. The Administrator is the sponsor of the 
committee, which consists of members appointed by the Administrator as 
representatives of a broad spectrum of the aviation community. The 
committee provides the aviation public a means by which to have its 
interests in aviation safety rulemaking taken into consideration in the 
development of regulatory actions. The committee provides the FAA with 
the benefit of obtaining the input of affected parties before a 
proposal is ever issued, thus enabling the agency to produce better 
documents. The functions of the committee are solely advisory.
    The Secretary of Transportation has determined that the formation 
and use of the committee are necessary in the public interest in 
connection with the performance of duties imposed on the FAA by law. 
Meetings of the committee and executive committee will be open to the 
public except as authorized by section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Office of Rulemaking (ARM-1), 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, 
DC 20591, telephone: 202-267-9677.

    Issued in Washington, D.C., on February 21, 1995.
Chris A. Christie,
Executive Director, Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 95-4980 Filed 2-28-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9719]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4097]



[[Page 9719]]

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

[AC-13; OTS No. 06527]


Queen City Federal Savings Bank Virginia, Minnesota; Approval of 
Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on February 10, 1995, the Deputy 
Assistant Director, Corporate Activities, Office of Thrift Supervision, 
or her designee, acting pursuant to delegated authority, approved the 
application of Queen City Federal Savings Bank, Virginia, Minnesota, to 
convert to the stock form of organization. Copies of the application 
are available for inspection at the Information Services Division, 
Office of Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 
20552, and the Midwest Regional Office, Office of Thrift Supervision, 
122 W. John Carpenter Freeway, Suite 600, Irving, Texas 75039.

    Dated: February 14, 1995.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Nadine Y. Washington,
Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-4097 Filed 2-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 29 (Friday, February 12, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7583-7584]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02917]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs

[167 A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900]


Indian Gaming; Extension of Tribal-State Class III Gaming Compact 
(Crow Creek Sioux Tribe and the State of South Dakota)

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the extension of the Class III gaming 
compact between the Crow Creek Sioux Tribe and the State of South 
Dakota.

DATES: Effective February 12, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming, Office of the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, 
Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: An extension to an existing tribal-state 
Class III gaming compact does not require approval by the Secretary if 
the extension does not modify any other terms of the compact. See 
Pursuant to 25 CFR 293.5. The Crow Creek Sioux

[[Page 7584]]

Tribe and the State of South Dakota have reached an agreement to extend 
the expiration of their existing Tribal-State Class III gaming compact 
until June 23, 2016. This publishes notice of the new expiration date 
of the compact.

    Dated: February 3, 2016.
Lawrence R. Roberts,
Acting Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2016-02917 Filed 2-11-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4337-15-P
#### JAMES *R.*KELLER v. HUFFMAN FULL FASHIONED MILLS, INC.

(Filed 21 October, 1959.)

1. Master and Servant § 2e—

Judgment sustaining demurrer to the complaint in an action to recover damages on account oí plaintiff’s being denied employment because of membership in a labor union, reversed on authority of *Willard v. Huffman,*250 N.C. 396.

Higgins, J., not sitting.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Campbell, J.,*at June, 1959 Term, of Burke.

Civil action to recover damages on account of plaintiff being denied employment because of membership in a labor union under and by virtue of General Statutes 95-83.

On 5 June, 1959, in Superior Court the trial judge sustained demurrer of defendant to the jurisdiction, and dismissed the cause of action. Plaintiff appeals to Supreme Court and assigns error.

*93
      *Robert S. Cahoon for •plaintiff, appellant.*

*Patton & Ervin for defendant, appellee.*

Pee Cueiam.

In the light of and by authority of decision of this Court in the case of *James M. Willard v. P. T. Huffman,*et al, in opinion filed 12 June, 1959, and reported in Yol. 250 at page 396, of North Carolina Supreme Court reports, the judgment from which this appeal is taken is

Reversed.

HiggiNS, J., not sitting.
#### STATE v. SAPHRONIA SMITH.

(Filed 25 November, 1959.)

1. Criminal Law § 79—

Evidence discovered in the course of a search under a duly issued search warrant is competent, G.S. 15-27, notwithstanding the contention that the officers conducted the search in an unreasonable manner in entering the premises forcibly without first giving notice of their identity or authority to make the search, the common law rule except as modified by statute being applicable.

Appeal by defendant from *Hall, J.,*June Term, 1959, of Randolph.

Upon trial in superior court, the jury found the defendant guilty of (1) unlawful possession, and (2) unlawful possession for the purpose of sale, of intoxicating liquor; and from judgment, imposing a prison sentence, defendant appealed.

*Attorney General Séawell and Assistant Attorney General Love for the State.*

*Hammond & Walker for defendant, appellant.*

Per Curiam.

Defendant does not challenge 'the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict and judgment. Her sole contention is that, upon objection 'aptly made, the court should have excluded and suppressed the evidence upon which the State based its case, *i.e.,*facts discovered and evidence obtained by officers in the course of their search of defendant’s residence.

The officers searched defendant’s premises under authority of a search warrant. Defendant does not challenge the validity of the search warrant. Her contention is that the officers conducted the search in an unreasonable manner in that they entered her premises forcibly without first giving sufficient notice of their identity as officers or of their authority to make the search.

Under the common law rule the evidence was competent; and, except as modified by G.S. 15-27, the common law rule controls. *S. v. McGee,*214 N.C. 184, 198 S.E. 616. Suffice to say, G.S. 15-27 does not make incompetent facts discovered or evidence obtained in the course of a search authorized by a duly issued search warrant. Hence, defendant’s contention is without merit.

No error.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                     INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT

Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
Dallas, Texas

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Amendment No. 2 to Registration
Statement No. 333-56983 on Form S-3 of XTO Energy Inc. and Cross Timbers Royalty
Trust and in the Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement
No. 33-55784 on Form S-8 of XTO Energy Inc. and Registration Statement No.
333-91460 on Form S-8 of XTO Energy Inc. of our report dated March 14, 2003,
included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cross Timbers Royalty Trust for
the year ended December 31, 2002. The 2001 and 2000 financial statements were
audited by other auditors who have ceased operations. Those auditors' report,
dated March 19, 2002, on those financial statements was unqualified and included
an explanatory paragraph that described the trust's method of accounting as
explained in Note 2 to the financial statements.



KPMG LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 31, 2003
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 14

- 00756

- CV
Valley Baptist Medical Center

- Brownsville

v. Rosalinda Battles, Gerald Battles, as Surviving Spouse of Rosalinda Battles, Amanda Giselle Battles, as Surviving Child of Rosalinda Battles, and Jeremy Blake Battles, as Surviving Child of Rosalinda Battles
On Appeal from the 444th District Court of Cameron County , Texas Trial Cause No. 2013

- DCL

- 4983

- H

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed in part and rendered in part, and the case should be remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED IN PART and RENDERED IN PART, and the case is REMANDED for further p roceedings consistent with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 50% against appellant and against a ppell ee

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.

June 25, 2015
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 37 (Friday, February 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 10383]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4506]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-157-000]


K N Interstate Gas Transmission Co.; Notice of Filing of Report 
on First Year Storage Operations Under Order No. 636

February 17, 1995.
    Take notice that on February 10, 1995, K N Interstate Gas 
Transmission Co. (KNI) tendered for filing its report on first year of 
operation under restructured services pursuant to Order No. 636.
    KNI states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with the 
Commission's Order on Compliance and Restructuring Rule, issued August 
2, 1993 in Docket No. RS92-19-000.\1\ The August 2 order directed KNI 
to file a report within 90 days after the first year of operations 
under its restructured services indicating the use of the retained 
pipeline transportation capacity. KNI states that the report is being 
filed in compliance with the referenced order.

    \1\64 FERC 61,154 (1993).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    KNI states that copies of the filing are being served upon all 
parties in Docket No. RS92-19-000.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.214 and 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests should 
be filed on or before March 10, 1995. Protests will be considered by 
the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but 
will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. 
Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available 
for public inspection in the public reference room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-4506 Filed 2-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM 10Q
FILING AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             258
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,160
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,025
<INVENTORY>                                      1,544
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,895
<PP&E>                                          23,435
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,080
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 346,868
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,429
<BONDS>                                        223,677
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,814
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   346,868
<SALES>                                        115,955
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               115,955
<CGS>                                           43,356
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  118,332
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (57)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,176
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (21,496)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,305)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (19,191)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (19,191)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.01**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the GRIC Communications,Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period endedMarch 31, 2004, I, Bharat Davé, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of myknowledge based on a review of the Report: (1) the Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompany for the period covered by the Report.

 
| Date:  May 10, 2004 | By:    | /s/ BHARAT  DAVÉ                    |   |
|--------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|                     |   | Bharat Davé                         |
|                     |   | President  & Chief Executive Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to GRIC and will be retained byGRIC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

1

----
Order entered November 30, 2012

In The 

## igtrig of exag at
No. 05-12-00922-CR DANIEL EDWARD MURRAY,Appellant

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee .On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 366-80173-06



### ORDER Appellant’s November 28, 2012 second motion for extension of the t~me to file appellant’s brief is DENIED. We ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has 

### not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See 

### TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court ~sORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which

may include appointment of new counsel. We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this 

### order. This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9718]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4098]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
[AC-14; OTS No. 01985]


Avondale Federal Savings Bank, Chicago, Illinois; Approval of 
Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on February 10, 1995, the Deputy 
Assistant Director, Corporate Activities, Office of Thrift Supervision, 
or her designee, acting pursuant to delegated authority, approved the 
application of Avondale Federal Savings Bank, Chicago, Illinois, to 
convert to the stock form of organization. Copies of the application 
are available for inspection at the Information Services Division, 
Office of Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 
20552, and the Central Regional Office, of Thrift Supervision, 111 East 
Wacker Drive, Suite 800, Chicago, Illinois 60601-4360.

    Dated: February 14, 1995.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Nadine Y. Washington,
Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-4098 Filed 2-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
#### Emily M. English, Plaintiff, v. George B. Ripley, Trustee, etc., Defendant.

Judgment 1 ordered for defendant with twenty-five dollars costs.

Opinion

*Per CuHam.*
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3872 

To clarify the jurisdiction of the Special Inspector General for Pandemic 

Recovery, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 17, 2022 

Mr. HAWLEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To clarify the jurisdiction of the Special Inspector General 

for Pandemic Recovery, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JURISDICTION OF THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR 

4 GENERAL FOR PANDEMIC RECOVERY. 

5 Section 4018(c)(1) of the CARES Act (15 U.S.C. 

6 9053(c)(1)) is amended by striking ‘‘this Act’’ each place 

7 that term appears and inserting ‘‘this division’’. 

8 SEC. 2. APPROPRIATIONS. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—In addition to amounts otherwise 

10 available, there is appropriated to the Special Inspector 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3872 IS

1 General for Pandemic Recovery, out of amounts in the 

2 Treasury not otherwise appropriated, $25,000,000 for 

3 each of fiscal years 2022 through 2025 to carry out the 

4 provisions of section 4018 of the CARES Act (15 U.S.C. 

5 9053), as amended by section 1 of this Act. 

6 (b) EMERGENCY DESIGNATION.— 

7 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amounts appropriated 

8 under this section are designated as an emergency 

9 requirement pursuant to section 4(g) of the Statu10 tory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 (2 U.S.C. 933(g)). 

11 (2) DESIGNATION IN SENATE.—In the Senate, 

12 subparagraph (A) is designated as an emergency re13 quirement pursuant to section 4112(a) of H. Con. 

14 Res. 71 (115th Congress), the concurrent resolution 

15 on the budget for fiscal year 2018. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 001 3 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ELIZABETH MARGARET HOSCHOUER,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including June 23, 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Beth Baker Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 16 2023

05/16/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0013