alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9697]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4172]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION
[Docket No. AB-55 (Sub-No. 484X)]


CSX Transportation, Inc.)--Abandonment Exemption--In the City of 
Suffolk, VA

AGENCY: Interstate Commerce Commission.

ACTION: Notice of exemption.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: CSX Transportation, Inc. (CSXT) has petitioned for an 
exemption from the prior approval requirements of 49 U.S.C. 10903-10904 
for the abandonment of its 3.81-mile segment of branch line track from 
milepost AB-214.0 to the end of the track at milepost AB-210.19 in the 
City of Suffolk, VA. We will grant the exemption, subject to standard 
labor protective conditions and a condition that CSXT consult with the 
City of Suffolk prior to completion of salvage operations.

DATES: This exemption will be effective on March 23, 1995, unless it is 
stayed or a formal expression of intent to file an offer of financial 
assistance is filed. Petitions to stay must be filed by March 8, 1995. 
Petitions for reconsideration or reopening must be filed by March 18, 
1995. Formal expressions of intent to file an offer of financial 
assistance under 49 CFR 1152.27(c)(2)\1\ must be filed by March 3, 
1995.

    \1\See Exempt. of Rail Abandonment--Offers of Finan. Assist., 4 
I.C.C.2d 164 (1987).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

ADDRESSES: Send pleadings, referring to Docket No. AB-55 (Sub-No. 
484X), to: (1) Office of the Secretary, Case Control Branch, Interstate 
Commerce Commission, 1201 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC. 
20423; and (2) petitioner's representative: Charles M. Rosenburger, 500 
Water Street--J150, Jacksonville, FL 32202.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph Dettmar, (202) 927-5660. [TDD for the hearing impaired: (202) 
927-5721].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Commission's full decision. To purchase a copy of the full decision, 
write to, call, or pick up in person from: Dynamic Concepts, Inc., Room 
2229, Interstate Commerce Commission Building, 1201 Constitution Avenue 
NW., Washington, DC. 20423. Telephone: (202) 289-4357/4359. [Assistance 
for the hearing impaired is available through TDD service (202) 927-
5721.].

    Decided: February 7, 1995.

    By the Commission, Chairman McDonald, Vice Chairman Morgan, 
Commissioners Simmons and Owen.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-4172 Filed 2-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7035-01P-M
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3681 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3681

  To require the Secretary of State to submit to Congress classified 
 dissent cables relating to the withdrawal of the United States Armed 
                        Forces from Afghanistan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 17, 2022

   Mr. Thune (for himself, Mr. Risch, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Braun, Mr. 
 Cramer, Mr. Cruz, Mr. Daines, Ms. Ernst, Mrs. Hyde-Smith, Mr. Hoeven, 
 Mr. Rubio, Mr. Scott of South Carolina, Mr. Sullivan, and Mr. Wicker) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                     Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Secretary of State to submit to Congress classified 
 dissent cables relating to the withdrawal of the United States Armed 
                        Forces from Afghanistan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUBMISSION TO CONGRESS OF DISSENT CABLES RELATING TO 
              WITHDRAWAL OF THE UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES FROM 
              AFGHANISTAN.

    (a) Submission of Classified Dissent Cables to Congress.--Not later 
than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 
of State shall submit to Congress any classified Department of State 
cable or memo that expresses a dissenting recommendation or opinion 
with respect to the withdrawal of the United States Armed Forces from 
Afghanistan.
    (b) Public Availability of Unclassified Dissent Cables.--Not later 
than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 
of State shall make available to the public an unclassified version of 
any such cable or memo.
    (c) Protection of Personally Identifiable Information.--The name 
and any other personally identifiable information of an author of a 
cable or memo referred to in subsection (a) shall be redacted before 
submission under that subsection or publication under subsection (b).
                                 <all>
```
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-19-0000695 06-MAR-2020 08:57 AM
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JOSE ALVARADO,

Appellant,

v.

PATRICIA MONTALBO,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-23-00130-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 3

of Bexar County, Texas

(TC# 2016CV04373)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on Appellant’s unopposed motion to dismiss and

concludes the motion should be granted and the appeal should be dismissed. We therefore dismiss 

the appeal. We further order Appellant to pay all costs of the appeal and that this decision be 

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 9TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Chief Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Charles V. Buddensieck, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed.

Opinion by

Daniels and Brady, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

                        NEOMETRIX TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NEOMETRIX TECHNOLOGY GROUP, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending April 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Norman J. Birmingham, the President, Chief Financial Officer and Director of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ NORMAN J. BIRMINGHAM
------------------------
Norman J. Birmingham
President, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) and Director
June 22, 2004

The foregoing certifications are made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for
any other purpose.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 26, 2010 

p0222 

Order 

 

February 26, 2010 

139804 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139804 

 COA: 284652 

Oakland CC: 06-210963-FC 

WILLIAM STANLEY PATTISON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 25, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
I, David R. Odenath, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and President of Prudential Annuities Life Assurance Corporation (the Company), hereby certify that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 14, 2008



/s/ David R. Odenath, Jr.Name:

David R. Odenath, Jr.Title:

Chief Executive Officer and President


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 22, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9823]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4220]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army


Army Science Board; Notice of Closed Meeting

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (P.L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following 
Committee Meeting.

    Name of Committee: Army Science Board (ASB).
    Date of Meeting: 15 & 16 March 1995.
    Time of Meeting: 0800-1700, 15 March 1995.
    Place: 0800-1700, 16 March 1995. Pentagon--Washington, DC.
    Agenda: The Army Science Board's Ad Hoc Study on ``ASB Space and 
Missile Defense Organization'' will have its 4th meeting at the 
Pentagon on 15 and 16 March. These meetings will be closed to the 
public in accordance with Section 552b(c) of title 5, U.S.C., 
specifically subparagraph (1) thereof, and Title 5, U.S.C., Appendix 
2, subsection 10(d). The classified and unclassified matter to be 
discussed are so inextricably intertwined so as to preclude opening 
all portions of the meeting. The ASB Administrative Officer, Sally 
Warner, may be contacted for further information at (703) 695-0781.
Sally A. Warner,
Administrative Officer, Army Science Board.
[FR Doc. 95-4220 Filed 2-21-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual Balance 

in 75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Ann

Balan

75th 

-1.92% -5.70% 0.34% 0.54% -1.58% -5.1

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2005 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actu

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Cost-of-Living Adjustment

Proposed Provision: Beginning December 2006, use the superlative (or chained) CPI for COLto reduce the COLA by 0.22 percentage point

January 11, 2006

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this prov

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

0.005.00

10.0015.0020.0025.00

2005 2015 2025 2035 2045 2055 2065 2075

Year

Percent

Cost rates with this provisionCost rates under present lawIncome rates with this provisionIncome rates under present law

OASDI tax rate schedule 

(employees and employers, each)

1993 and later 6.2%

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditu

0

100200300400500600700800900

1000

2005 2015 2025 2035 2045 205

Year

Percent

Present law with thi
# **Exhibit 31.2**

# ** **

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Shane M. Bayless, certify that:

 

1.              I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June30, 2004 of Petrohawk Energy Corporation (the “Company”);

 

2.              Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.              Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company asof, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.              The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and we have:

 

a.              Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the Company, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b.             Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c.              Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.              The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theCompany’s auditors and the audit committee of Company’s board of directors (orother persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a.              All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b.             Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Date: August 13, 2004

 
|   | By:                                                    | /s/ Shane M. Bayless |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|--------|
|   | Shane M. Bayless,                                      |
|   | Vice President- Chief Financial Officer and  Treasurer |

 

----
#### *L.*T. PAFFORD v. J. A. JONES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and D. DRADDY.

(Filed 27 November, 1940.)

Appeal and Error § 38—

When, the Supreme Court is evenly divided in opinion, one Justice not sitting, the judgment of the lower court will be affirmed without becoming a precedent.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Johnston, Special Judge,*at September Term, 1940, of MecbileNbueg.

*783Action for damages for personal injuries alleged to bave been caused by tbe negligence of defendants. Defendants demurred on tbe ground that tbe complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. From judgment sustaining tbe demurrer, plaintiff appealed.

*G. T. Carswell and Joe W. Ervin for plaintiff, appellant.*

*J. Laurence Jones and Stewart & Moore for defendant, appellee.*

Peb Cubiam.

One member of tbe Court, *Winborne, J.,*not sitting, and tbe remaining six being evenly divided in opinion, tbe judgment of tbe Superior Court is affirmed in accord witb tbe usual practice in sucb cases, and stands as tbe decision in tbis case without becoming a precedent. *Howard v. Coach Co.,*216 N. C., 799.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 248 (Wednesday, December 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 66988]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31321]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION
[Finance Docket No. 32795]


Plainview Terminal Company; Purchase and Operation Exemption; 
Floydada and Plainview Railroad Company

    The Plainview Terminal Company (PTC) has filed a notice of 
exemption to acquire the operating rights of Floydada and Plainview 
Railroad Company to provide local switching service on an approximately 
4.6-mile line of railroad owned by The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe 
Railway Company (ATSF) between Plainview Subdivision milepost 627 plus 
1791.7 feet at Plainview, TX (Santa Fe Railway Connection), and 
Floydada Subdivision milepost 4 plus 3160 feet at Plainview, TX. The 
proposed transaction was expected to be consummated on October 25, 
1995. PTC certified that its projected revenues do not exceed those 
that would qualify it as a class III carrier.
    PTC owns no railroad lines and conducts no rail operations subject 
to the Commission's jurisdiction. RailAmerica, Inc. (RAI) owns 100% of 
PTC's stock. RAI owns or controls six other class III shortline 
railroads.
    This transaction is related to a notice of exemption filed in 
RailAmerica, Inc.--Continuance in Control Exemption--West Texas and 
Lubbock Railroad Company, Inc. and Plainview Terminal Company, Finance 
Docket No. 32797, for RAI to continue in control of PTC and West Texas 
and Lubbock Railroad Company (WTLR) and five other class III railroads 
upon PTC and WTLR becoming class III rail carriers.
    Any comments must be filed with the Commission <SUP>1 and served 
on: Robert A. Wimbish, Rea, Cross and Auchinclass, 1920 N. Street, NW, 
Suite 420, Washington, DC 20036.

    \1\ Legislation to sunset the Commission on December 31, 1995, 
and transfer remaining functions is now under consideration in 
Congress. Until further notice, parties submitting pleadings should 
continue to use the current name and address.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice is filed under 49 CFR 1150.31. If the notice contains 
false or misleading information, the exemption is void ab initio. 
Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10505(d) may be filed 
at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically 
stay the transaction.

    Decided: December 19, 1995.

    By the Commission, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams, Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-31321 Filed 12-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7035-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 15, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 8770]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3971]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE

TIME AND DATE: February 24, 1995, 10:00 am-4:00 pm.

Place: The Corporation For National Service, 8th Floor Conference Room, 
1201 New York Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20525.

status: The meeting will be open to the public up to the seating 
capacity of the room.

matters to be considered: The Board of Directors of the Corporation for 
National and Community Service will meet on February 24, 1995, to 
review reports from Committees of the Board of Directors on Corporation 
activities, review the report from the Chief Executive Officer, and to 
review the status of various Corporation initiatives. There will be a 
period devoted to public comment at the end of the meeting.

contact person for further information: Rhonda Taylor, Associate 
Director of Special Projects and Initiatives, The Corporation For 
National Service, 8th Floor, Room 8619, 1201 New York Avenue, N.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20525. Phone (202) 606-5000 ext. 282. Fax (202) 565-
2794.

    Dated: February 13, 1995.
Terry Russell,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 95-3971, Filed 2-13-95; 3:07 pm]
BILLING CODE 6050-28-M
### JLtk* \jOIL-&) -Wos i -L £ej2e/i4'<S /L?e,W/ A Ie /fe/C t4L*? Vfalt office UjM. A £o\ /tfAKieJ "dux 

# AfP)^ Ac uj/.f &f /^^ fa^ ^ ^U ,:- u "T • ^ ^ Ac* A^l COURTOF CRIMINALAPPEALS APR 012015 m ^~3u- /$~
Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCWC-14-0001079 

13-OCT-2016 

09:38 AM 

SCWC-14-0001079
 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I 

STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
 

vs.
 

SAMUEL EAGER, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
 

(CAAP-14-0001079; CR. NO. 13-1-0145)
 

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
 

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
 

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Samuel Eager’s
 

application for writ of certiorari filed on September 1, 2016, is
 

hereby accepted, and will be scheduled for oral argument. The
 

parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding
 

scheduling. 


DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, October 13, 2016. 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
 

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack
 

/s/ Michael D. Wilson
## Summary Measures and Graphs

- Individual Provisions
- Coverage of Employment or Earnings, or Inclusion of Other Sources of Revenue

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						F7: For the estate tax, gift tax, and generation skipping transfer (GST) tax, return the respective exemption thresholds and tax rates to 2009 levels ($3.5 million threshold for estate tax with a top 45% tax rate) for deaths after 2023 and gifts made after 2023, with those levels not indexed in future years. All proceeds from the estate tax, gift tax, and GST tax would go to the OASI and DI Trust Funds.**

|  |  |
|--|--|