alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM
10-K/A FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                               1,202,668
<SECURITIES>                         7,253,756
<RECEIVABLES>                          431,046
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0
<INVENTORY>                            826,008
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     9,931,991
<PP&E>                               4,707,848
<DEPRECIATION>                       2,989,698
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      15,753,903
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                5,369,071
<BONDS>                              2,204,053
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                684
<COMMON>                                 5,712
<OTHER-SE>                           9,418,602
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        15,753,903
<SALES>                              4,701,649
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     5,101,746
<CGS>                                3,099,078
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       16,561,402
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     227,160
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              0
<INCOME-TAX>                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          0
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                        15,425,817
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             7.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                0
        


</TABLE>
#### Alfred Nelson, as Executor, etc., Respondent, v. Sutherland Tenney, as Assignee, etc., Appellant, Impleaded, etc.

Judgment affirmed.
##### 



6.
    
    I have reviewed and read this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Kolorfusion
International, Inc.;7.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly Report;8.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report;9.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervisions,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this Quarterly Report is being prepared;(b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this Quarterly Report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    disclosed in this Quarterly Report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and
 10.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and board of directors performing the equivalent functions of an
audit committee:
 (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
controls over financial reporting; and
 Date: November 14, 2005
    
    By: /s/ Stephen NagelStephen NagelPresident and Chief Financial Officer
#### The Warsaw Milling Company v. John M. Berry.

*Sales—Wheat—Refusal to Accept—Damages.*

In an action brought to recover damages sustained in consequence of a refusal by the purchaser to receive a carload of wheat, this court declines to interfere with a verdict for the plaint,ill.

[Opinion filed January 21, 1889.]

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Hancock County; the Hon. C. J. Scofield, Judge, presiding.

Messrs. O’Harra & Scofield, for appellant.

Messrs. Sharp *&*Berry Bros., for appellee.

*Per Curiam.*

This was a suit originally commenced before a justice of the peace, and, upon appeal to the Circuit Court, appellee recovered a judgment for $76.29.

*107It was brought to recover damages sustained by appellee in consequence of appellant’s refusal to receive a car load of wheat sold to it by appellee.

The whole controversy turns upon the question whether or not the car of wheat was of the character bought.

It is insisted by appellant that when the car reached Warsaw it was damp and musty, while on the part of the appellee it is contended that the wheat was of the character required by the contract when it was shipped at Carthage.

We have carefully examined the testimony in the record and find no good reason for interfering with the conclusion reached by the jury. A question of fact like the one in dispute in this record is one that a fair-minded jury, who have the opportunity of hearing the witnesses and observing their manner of testifying, would be more likely to solve correctly than we could from an inspection of the evidence as it appears in the record.

There is no evidence of prejudice or passion on the part of the jury, and the judgment of the Circuit Court will be affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
Exhibit 32.2

            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHNAGE ACT OF 1934
                         RULE 13a-14(b) OR 15d-14(b) AND
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



   In connection with the quarterly report of Kolorfusion International, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly
Report"), I, Stephen Nagel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify for
the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code, that:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      1.    the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

      2.    the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
            in all material respect, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Dated: May 13, 2005                                      By: /s/ Stephen Nagel
                                                             -------------------
                                                         Stephen Nagel
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32**
**CERTIFICATION**
The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:
(1) The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2004, fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and
(2) The information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Date:  February 14, 2005 /s/ Mark N. Schwartz   Chief Executive Officer              Date:  February 14, 2005 /s/ James S. Murphy   Chief Financial Officer      
24
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 28, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 10859]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4842]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

 Ogle County Bancshares; Notice of Applications to Engage de novo 
in Permissible Nonbanking Activities

    The company listed in this notice has filed an application under 
Sec.  225.23(a)(1) of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.23(a)(1)) 
for the Board's approval under section 4(c)(8) of the Bank Holding 
Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843(c)(8)) and Sec.  225.21(a) of Regulation Y 
(12 CFR 225.21(a)) to commence or to engage de novo, either directly or 
through a subsidiary, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in Sec.  
225.25 of Regulation Y as closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, such activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    The application is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing on the question whether consummation of the proposal can 
``reasonably be expected to produce benefits to the public, such as 
greater convenience, increased competition, or gains in efficiency, 
that outweigh possible adverse effects, such as undue concentration of 
resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interests, or 
unsound banking practices.'' Any request for a hearing on this question 
must be accompanied by a statement of the reasons a written 
presentation would not suffice in lieu of a hearing, identifying 
specifically any questions of fact that are in dispute, summarizing the 
evidence that would be presented at a hearing, and indicating how the 
party commenting would be aggrieved by approval of the proposal.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the application must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than March 14, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (James A. Bluemle, Vice 
President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690:
    1. Ogle County Bancshares, Rochelle, Illinois; to engage de novo in 
making and servicing loans, pursuant to Sec. 225.25(b)(1) of the 
Board's Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 22, 
1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-4842 Filed 2-27-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Ex Rel. T. C. AMICK et al. v. W. G. LANCASTER et al.

(Filed 5 November, 1947.)

1. Appeal and Error § 401—

Tbe Supreme Court will not determine a constitutional question, even when properly presented, if there be also present some other ground on which the case may b'e made to turn.

2. Nuisances § 7—

, The statutory procedure to abate a public nuisance, G. S., 19-2, is not appropriate against a municipal alcoholic control board set up under color of legislative authority (Chap. 862, Session Laws of 1947), nor against the lessor of the building used for the purpose of operating a liquor control store.

Appeal by plaintiffs from *Nimocks, J.,*22 September, 1947, in Chambers at Louisburg. From FbaNeliN.

Civil action in tbe name of tbe State on relation of citizens of Franklin County to padlock premises used in operation of “Town Liquor Control Store” and to enjoin its maintenance as a nuisance.

Pursuant to Cbap. 862, Session Laws of 1947, a “Town Liquor Control Store” in tbe Town of Louisburg was authorized by vote of tbe people, and is now being operated in a building owned by *W.*G. Lancaster and leased by him to “Tbe Town of Louisburg Board of Alcoholic Control” for such purpose.

It is alleged that tbe Act of Assembly under which tbe defendants have established, and are now operating, tbe Town Liquor Control Store in question is unconstitutional and all proceedings thereunder are perforce illegal and void. Hence, tbe plaintiffs invoke tbe provisions of G. S., 19-1 and 19-2, to have tbe store declared an offense against public morals, or a nuisance, and its operation as such abated.

After a full bearing, “tbe court being of opinion that plaintiffs relators are not entitled to tbe relief prayed for in tbe complaint,” dismissed the action with costs.

Plaintiffs appeal, assigning errors.

*G. M. Beam and Hill Yarborough for plaintiffs, appellants.*

*Malone & Malone for defendants, Allen, Sykes, Wheless, Joyner, and Collins, appellees.*

Stacy, C. J.

It is not stated whether tbe action was dismissed on procedural or constitutional grounds. Hence, we do not reach tbe constitutional question, if tbe remedy be defective or inappropriate. “Tbe *158courts will not determine a constitutional question, even when properly presented, if there be also present some other ground upon which the case may be made to turn.” *S. v. Lueders,*214 N. C., 558, 200 S. E., 22.

It would be strange indeed, if the same government which authorizes the establishment of a “liquor control store,” should also provide for its padlocking at the instance of a private citizen and thus render all who are connected with its maintenance “guilty of a nuisance.” Gr. S., 19-1. It was never intended that the procedure here 'invoked to abate a nuisance, Gr. S., 19-2, should be applied against an alcoholic control board set up under color of legislative authority, or against one who rents a building to such a board for the purpose of operating a liquor control store. The remedy selected seems inappropriate.

There was no error in dismissing the action.

Affirmed.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3634 

To create a point of order requiring an inflation impact report with any 

legislation that makes discretionary appropriations. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 10, 2022 

Ms. ERNST (for herself, Mr. BRAUN, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. HAGERTY, Mr. 

SCOTT of Florida, and Mrs. BLACKBURN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

A BILL 

To create a point of order requiring an inflation impact 

report with any legislation that makes discretionary appropriations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Providing Reports on 

5 Inflation Costs and Economic Impact Act’’ or the ‘‘PRICE 

6 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3634 IS

1 SEC. 2. POINT OF ORDER REQUIRING AN INFLATION IM2 PACT REPORT WITH ANY LEGISLATION THAT 

3 MAKES DISCRETIONARY APPROPRIATIONS. 

4 (a) POINT OF ORDER.—It shall not be in order in 

5 the Senate to consider a bill, joint resolution, motion, 

6 amendment, amendment between the Houses, or con7 ference report making discretionary appropriations (as de8 fined in section 250(c) of the Balanced Budget and Emer9 gency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 900(c))) un10 less an inflation impact report by the Congressional Budg11 et Office with respect to the measure is submitted for pub12 lication in the Congressional Record, including an analysis 

13 of the impact the measure would have on— 

14 (1) the Consumer Price Index for All Urban 

15 Consumers published by the Bureau of Labor Statis16 tics of the Department of Labor; 

17 (2) the Employment Cost Index for private in18 dustry workers published by the Bureau of Labor 

19 Statistics; and 

20 (3) the purchasing power of consumers, includ21 ing a comparison of the impact described in para22 graph (1) and the impact described in paragraph 

23 (2). 

24 (b) SUPERMAJORITY WAIVER AND APPEALS.— 

25 (1) WAIVER.—This section may be waived or 

26 suspended in the Senate only by the affirmative vote 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3634 IS

1 of three-fifths of the Members, duly chosen and 

2 sworn. 

3 (2) APPEALS.—Appeals in the Senate from the 

4 decisions of the Chair relating to any provision of 

5 this section shall be limited to 1 hour, to be equally 

6 divided between, and controlled by, the appellant 

7 and the manager of the bill or joint resolution, as 

8 the case may be. An affirmative vote of three-fifths 

9 of the Members of the Senate, duly chosen and 

10 sworn, shall be required to sustain an appeal of the 

11 ruling of the Chair on a point of order raised under 

12 this section. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             300
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,503
<PP&E>                                         430,093
<DEPRECIATION>                                     253
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 527,456
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           67,085
<BONDS>                                        408,799
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,249
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   527,456
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,301
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,338
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,601)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,601)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,601)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### STATE v. BILLIE SIMMONS.

(Filed 26 November, 1947.)

Rape § 5—

An instruction which fails to charge that the carnal knowledge of prose-cutrix must have been accomplished by force and against her will to constitute the crime of rape must be held for reversible error. G. S., 14-21.

" Appeal bji defendant from *Edmundson, Special Judge,*at August Term, 1947, of SaMpsoN.

Criminal prosecution upon indictment charging defendant with the c-rime of rape of a certain named female person.

Verdict: Guilty of rape as charged in the bill of indictment.

Judgment: Death by the administration of lethal gas as provided by law.

Defendant appeals to Supreme Court and assigns error.

. *Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorneys General Bruton, Rhodes, and Moody for the State.*

*A. McL. Graham and P. D. Herring for defendant, appellant.*

WiNBORNE, J.

Defendant assigns as error the following portion of the .court’s charge to the jury: “The court charges you if you find from the evidence in this case and beyond a reasonable doubt that the prisoner had carnal knowledge of the prosecuting witness as that term has been defined by the court to you then you will return a verdict of guilty of rape as charged in the bill of indictment.”

The error pointed out is the absence of these essential elements of the crime charged “ravishing ... by force and against her will.” G. S., 14-21.

■ The State concedes error in the instruction to which the exception is tallen.

Hence there must be a

New trial.
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual Balance 

in 75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

B

7

-1.70% -4.20% 0.68% 1.69% -1.02% 

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2008 Trustees Report Office of the Chief A

July 16, 2008

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Level of Monthly Benefits (PIA)

Proposed Provision: Progressive price indexing of PIA formula factors beginning with indivieligible for OASDI benefits in 2015. Create new bend point at the 60th percentile of earnercurrent-law benefits for earners at the 60th percentile and below and reduce upper 2 formuand 15%) such that maximum worker benefit grows by inflation rather than the growth in av

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this 

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

0.02.04.06.08.0

10.012.014.016.018.020.0

2008 2018 2028 2038 2048 2058 2068 2078

Year

Percent

Cost rates with this provisionCost rates under present lawIncome rates with this provisionIncome rates under present law

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

 (assets as a percentage of annual expe

0

100200300400500600700800900

1000

2008 2018 2028 2038 2048 2058 

Year

Percent

Present law With this p
Order entered May 27, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00468-CV

IN THE MATTER OF T.P., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 305th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. JD-77361-X

ORDER

The reporter=s record is overdue in this appeal. In an order dated April 10, 2014, we ordered

Pamela Sumler, Official Court Reporter for the 305th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, 

Texas, to file, within ten days, either (1) the reporter=s record, or (2) written verification that the 

reporter’s record has not been requested. 

On April 18, 2014, the Court received a letter from Pamela Sumler stating that counsel 

for appellant had not contacted her regarding either designation of the record or payment 

arrangements. However, on May 9, 2014, counsel for appellant informed us that he has 

requested the reporter’s record.

Appellant has been found indigent and is, therefore, allowed to proceed with the appeal 

without advance payment of costs. Accordingly, on the Court’s own motion, we ORDER, 

Pamela Sumler to file the reporter’s record by JUNE 26, 2014. We CAUTION Pamela Sumler 
that failure to comply with this order may result in an order that she not sit as a court reporter 

until she complies.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to The 

Honorable Cheryl Lee Shannon, Presiding Judge of the 305th Judicial District Court of Dallas 

County, Texas, Pamela Sumler, and counsel for all parties.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE