alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In
connection  with the  accompanying  Annual Report of Genta  Incorporated  (the  Company)
on Form 10-K for the year ended  December  31, 2004 (the Report),  I, William
P. Keane,  Chief Financial  Officer  of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(3) |  | The
Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(4) |  | The
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in  all material  respects,  the
financial  condition and results  of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:  March
14, 2005



|/s/ WILLIAM P. KEANE                                            | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|William P. Keane                                               
|Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate
Secretary

75

---
#### STATE v. CORNELIUS GRAHAM, Alias NEIL GRAHAM.

(Filed 7 May, 1941.)

Criminal Law § 80—

When defendant, convicted of a capital crime, is allowed to appeal *in forma pawperis,*but fails to make out and serve his statement of case on appeal within the time allowed, the appeal will be dismissed on motion of the Attorney-General and the judgment affirmed when the record is free from apparent error.

MotioN by State to docket case, affirm judgment, and dismiss appeal.

*Attorney-General McMullan for the State.*

Stacy, C. J.

At the January-Eebruary Term, 1941, Columbus Superior Court, the defendant herein, Cornelius Graham, *alias*Neil Graham, was tried upon indictment charging him with the murder of one Jenkins Robinson, which resulted in a conviction of murder in the first degree and sentence of death as the law commands. From the judgment thus entered, the defendant gave notice of appeal to the Supreme Court and was allowed 40 days to make out and serve his statement of case on appeal, and the solicitor was given 25 days thereafter to prepare and file exceptions or countercase.

The clerk certifies that “the time for perfecting appeal has expired and case on appeal has not been filed in this office.” *S. v. Stovall,*214 N. C., 695, 200 S. E., 426. In a letter to the Attorney-General counsel for defendant states that the appeal will not be perfected. “We have decided to go to the Governor asking commutation of sentence to life imprisonment.” No bond was required as the defendant was granted the privilege of appealing *in forma pauperis. S. v. Stafford,*203 N. C., 601, 166 S. E., 734.

As the record is apparently free from error, the motion of the Attorney-General will be allowed. *S. v. Flynn,*217 N. C., 345, 7 S. E. (2d), 700.

Judgment affirmed. Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<CIK>          0001059137
<NAME>         SIERRA HOLDINGS GROUP, INC.
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                              9524
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        9524
<PP&E>                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                             0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          9524
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  11050
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                           9327
<OTHER-SE>                                             (10853)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            9524
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           0
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       31837
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (31837)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (31837)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.00)
        

</TABLE>
#### MARVIN WHITLEY v. COCA-COLA BOTTLING WORKS.

(Filed 1 November, 1935.)

Appeal by defendants from *Barnhill, J.,*at March Term, 1935, of Pitt.

Civil action to recover damages for alleged negligent injury caused by particles of jagged and broken glass in a bottle of Coca-Cola manufactured by the defendants and swallowed by plaintiff, the ultimate consumer, who purchased the same from a dealer.

There was a verdict of $250 and judgment for plaintiff, from which the defendants appeal, assigning error.

*Blount & James for plaintiff.*

*J. B. Jamas for defendants.*

Pee Cubiam.

The evidence brings the case within the principles announced in *Perry v. Bottling Co.,*196 N. C., 175, 145 S. E., 14; *Broom v. Bottling Co.,*200 N. C., 55, 156 S. E., 152; *Enloe v. Bottling Co., ante, 309.*

No error.
## Summary Measures and Graphs

- Individual Provisions
- Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable)

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						E1.2: Increase the payroll tax rate (currently 12.4 percent) to 16.2 percent in 2034-2063, and to 20.0 percent in years 2064 and later.**

|  |  |
|--|--|
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Focal Communications (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kathleen Perone, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



/s/
Kathleen Perone

Kathleen
Perone
Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2002

---

QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 27 (Wednesday, February 10, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7185-7186]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02697]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN COMMISSION


Commission Meeting

AGENCY: Susquehanna River Basin Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 7186]]

SUMMARY: The Susquehanna River Basin Commission will hold its regular 
business meeting on March 10, 2016, in Aberdeen, Maryland. Details 
concerning the matters to be addressed at the business meeting are 
contained in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this notice.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Thursday, March 10, 2016, at 9 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the University Center, Room 130/
131, 1201 Technology Drive, Aberdeen, MD 21001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jason E. Oyler, General Counsel, 
telephone: (717) 238-0423, ext. 1312; fax: (717) 238-2436.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The business meeting will include actions or 
presentations on the following items: (1) Informational presentation of 
interest to the Lower Susquehanna Subbasin area; (2) adoption of final 
FY2017 budget; (3) a recommendation for new independent auditors; (4) 
ratification/approval of contracts/grants; (5) regulatory compliance 
matters for Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation, King Valley Golf Course, and 
Aqua Pennsylvania, Inc.; and (6) Regulatory Program projects.
    Projects listed for Commission action are those that were the 
subject of a public hearing conducted by the Commission on February 4, 
2016, and identified in the notice for such hearing, which was 
published in 81 FR 566, January 6, 2016.
    The public is invited to attend the Commission's business meeting. 
Comments on the Regulatory Program projects are subject to a deadline 
of February 15, 2016. Written comments pertaining to other items on the 
agenda at the business meeting may be mailed to the Susquehanna River 
Basin Commission, 4423 North Front Street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 
17110-1788, or submitted electronically through http://www.srbc.net/pubinfo/publicparticipation.htm. Such comments are due to the 
Commission on or before March 4, 2016. Comments will not be accepted at 
the business meeting noticed herein.

    Authority: Pub. L. 91-575, 84 Stat. 1509 et seq., 18 CFR parts 
806, 807, and 808.

    Dated: February 5, 2016.
Stephanie L. Richardson,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2016-02697 Filed 2-9-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7040-01-P
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3884 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

404 U.S. Highway 41 North in Baraga, Michigan, as the ‘‘Cora Reynolds 

Anderson Post Office’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 21, 2022 

Mr. PETERS (for himself and Ms. STABENOW) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 404 U.S. Highway 41 North in Baraga, Michigan, as the ‘‘Cora Reynolds Anderson Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CORA REYNOLDS ANDERSON POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 404 U.S. Highway 41 North in 

6 Baraga, Michigan, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Cora Reynolds Anderson Post Office’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3884 IS

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Cora Reynolds Ander3 son Post Office’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

OP 24-0341

_________________

DAWSON DENNIS PATRICK, DYLAN TODD 

LEE OVITT, SAMUAL MURRELL GREEN,

JOHN ARISPE, JOHN BLACKBURN,

JAMES HORODYSKI, JAMES LONDON,

HARLEY MCDONALD, TROY PARKER,

BRANDON ROSENHAHN, ANDREW 

SUITONU,

 Petitioners,

 v.

MONTANA FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

COURT, MINERAL COUNTY, HONORABLE

SHANE A. VANNATTA, PRESIDING JUDGE,

 Respondent.

O R D E R

_________________

Petitioners seek a writ of supervisory control over the Fourth Judicial District Court, 

Mineral County, in their respective criminal cases before that court. The petitioners allege

the District Court erred by reversing orders of the Mineral County Justice Court that granted 

their respective motions to suppress evidence. 

Having reviewed the Petition and the challenged Orders, we deem it appropriate to 

obtain a summary response. In accordance with M. R. App. P. 14(7),

IT IS THERFORE ORDERED that the Fourth Judicial District Court, and the State of 

Montana, or both, are granted 30 days from the date of this Order to prepare, file, and serve a 

response(s) to this petition for writ of supervisory control.

The Clerk is directed to provide immediate notice of this Order to counsel for 

Petitioner, the State of Montana, the Mineral County Attorney, and the Honorable Shane A.

Vannatta, presiding. 

Electronically signed by:

Ingrid Gustafson

Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 30 2024

05/30/2024

Case Number: OP 24-0341
Exhibit 10.2


December 29, 2022
​
Douglas S. Clark, Jr.
[address on file]
​
Re:  Special Bonus Agreement
​
Dear Doug,
​
As a key executive and strong contributor to the Company’s success, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has awarded you a one-time Special Bonus in the total gross amount of $60,000, less applicable withholdings. 
​
This bonus is awarded in recognition of your performance during 2022 related to executing our inventory strategy during a challenging supply chain environment, broadening our merchandise assortment and your efforts to offset higher costs through pricing, promotion and sourcing strategies.
​
If your employment with the Company should terminate for any reason before June 30, 2023, any amount of the Special Bonus that has been paid to you shall be subject to clawback by the Company and shall become immediately due and owing to the Company. In that event, you authorize the Company to deduct from any outstanding payment of wages the entire amount due to the Company. In the event this deduction is not sufficient to fully recoup the amount due to the Company, you will repay the outstanding amount within thirty (30) days of your separation. The Company may thereafter use all lawful means to collect any outstanding amounts, and you agree that the Company shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs in the event it is the prevailing party in any such action.
​
We appreciate all that you have accomplished in 2022 and look forward to driving even more success with you in 2023.
​
Sincerely,
/s/ Charles Tyson
Charles Tyson
President and Chief Executive Officer
​
​
	​


	​



	Accepted and Agreed:
	/s/ Douglas S. Clark, Jr.

	​
	Douglas S. Clark, Jr.



​
#### George W. Reid, Appellant, v. New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad Company, Respondent.

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs.
#### THE REAL ESTATE TRUST COMPANY v. GURNEY P. HOOD, Commissioner.

(Filed *15 March,*1933.)

Appeal by defendant from *Sink, J.,*at June Term, 1932, of BUNCOMBE.

Civil action to establish preference, or priority of plaintiff’s claim against funds in hands of liquidating agent of insolvent bank.

The case was heard by the court without the intervention of a jury, upon facts agreed or found without objection:

The Continental Mortgage Company issued certain bonds with interest coupons attached. These bonds and coupons were payable at the Central Bank and Trust Company, named as trustee for such purpose. To meet the interest represented by maturing coupons, the Continental Mortgage Company deposited with the Central Bank and Trust Company $2,001.25, and this amount was entered -upon the books of the trust department as having been received for the purpose of paying-said interest coupons.

When the Central Bank and Trust Company failed, 19 November, 1930, the above amount had not been applied to the payment of interest *779coupons, and according to the records of the trust department of the bank, the amount was still being held for said purpose.

Plaintiff sues as substituted trustee.

The court found that the amount so deposited with the Central Bank and Trust Company by the Continental Mortgage Company constituted a special deposit for a specific purpose and adjudged plaintiff entitled to a preference against the assets in the hands of the liquidating agent.

Defendant appeals, assigning error.

*Alfred S. Barnard for plaintiff.*

*J ohnson, Smothers & Rollins for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

Affirmed on authority of *Flack v. Hood, Comr., ante,*337. Plaintiff is entitled to a preference, and to share pro rata with other preferred creditors in the distribution of the funds in the hands of the liquidating agent of the Central Bank and Trust Company.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                      281

           List of Exhibits to Asset and Purchase Settlement Agreement

<TABLE>

<C>                                 <C>
Exhibit 2.5(a)                      List of Trademarks, Trademark Applications, Trademark Registrations, Patents
                                    and Patent Applications, Copyright Applications and Copyright Registrations

Exhibit 2.5(b)                      List of Tangible and Intangible Assets

Exhibit 2.5(c)                      List of Material Third-party Patents, Trademarks, Copyrights, Know-how,
                                    Proprietary Information

Exhibit 2.6                         List of Agreements and Arrangements

Exhibit 4.1                         General Release by and between Babar I. Hamirani and Technovation Computer
                                    Labs, Inc.

Exhibit 4.2                         General Release by and between Babar I. Hamirani and Nexar Technologies, Inc.

Exhibit 4.3(a)                      General Release by Amerisel, Inc.

Exhibit 4.3(b)                      General Release by Nexar Technologies, Inc.

Exhibit 4.4(a)                      General Release by and between Babar I. Hamirani and Technovation Computer
                                    Labs, Inc.

Exhibit 4.4(b)                      General Release by GDA Technologies, Inc.

Exhibit 6.1(a)(i)                   Bill of Sale by Technovation Computer Labs, Inc. to Palomar Medical
                                    Technologies, Inc.

Exhibit 6.1(a)(ii)                  Assignment of Technology

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3685 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3685

 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource 
study to determine the suitability and feasibility of establishing the 
 John P. Parker House in Ripley, Ohio, as a unit of the National Park 
                                System.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 17, 2022

Mr. Brown (for himself and Mr. Portman) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource 
study to determine the suitability and feasibility of establishing the 
 John P. Parker House in Ripley, Ohio, as a unit of the National Park 
                                System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``John P. Parker House Study Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of the Interior.
            (2) Study area.--The term ``study area'' means the John P. 
        Parker House in Ripley, Ohio, which was recognized as a 
        National Historic Landmark in 1997.

SEC. 3. SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY OF JOHN P. PARKER HOUSE.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a special resource study of 
the study area to determine the suitability and feasibility of 
establishing the John P. Parker House in Ripley, Ohio, as a unit of the 
National Park System.
    (b) Study Requirements.--The Secretary shall conduct the study in 
accordance with section 100507 of title 54, United States Code.
    (c) Report.--Not later than 18 months after the date on which funds 
are made available to carry out this Act, the Secretary shall submit to 
the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives and 
the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate a report 
that describes--
            (1) the results of the study; and
            (2) any recommendations of the Secretary.
                                 <all>
```
VI 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3442 

For the relief of Michael Janssen and Steven Passantino. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 5, 2022 

Mr. WARNOCK introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

For the relief of Michael Janssen and Steven Passantino. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER RETIREMENT 

4 BENEFITS FOR MICHAEL JANSSEN AND STE5 VEN PASSANTINO. 

6 (a) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘law en7 forcement officer’’ has the meaning given the term in sec8 tion 8401 of title 5, United States Code. 

9 (b) DEEMING OF SERVICE.—Notwithstanding any 

10 other provision of law, and subject to subsection (c), Mi11 chael Janssen and Steven Passantino shall, during any pe12 riod in which the applicable individual is employed as a 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3442 IS

1 series 1895 officer of the U.S. Customs and Border Pro2 tection before, on, or after the date of enactment of this 

3 Act, be deemed to be performing service as a law enforce4 ment officer under chapter 84 of title 5, United States 

5 Code, and shall be subject to the terms and conditions ap6 plicable to a law enforcement officer under that chapter. 

7 (c) CREDITABLE SERVICE; DEPOSIT.—Any creditable 

8 service performed before the date of enactment of this Act 

9 by Michael Janssen or Steven Passantino under chapter 

10 84 of title 5, United States Code, as a series 1895 officer 

11 of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall be 

12 deemed to be service as a law enforcement officer only if 

13 the applicable individual meets the deposit requirements 

14 of section 8411(f) of title 5, United States Code, with re15 spect to that service. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
No. 809.

#### Karpel *v.*California,

372 U. S. 703. Motion to dispense with printing petition for rehearing granted. Petition for rehearing denied.