alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF INTEGRATED INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. AS OF MARCH
31, 2000, AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS OF INTEGRATED INFORMATION
SYSTEMS, INC. FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           10413
<SECURITIES>                                     64240
<RECEIVABLES>                                     8184
<ALLOWANCES>                                       863
<INVENTORY>                                         64
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1493
<PP&E>                                           19007
<DEPRECIATION>                                    2030
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  102276
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            10499
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            20
<OTHER-SE>                                       84053
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    102276
<SALES>                                          10454
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 10454
<CGS>                                             5515
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    12880
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 113
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2267)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2267)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2267)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)


</TABLE>
#### John Deere Company, Inc., Plaintiff, v Douglas Richards, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Oneida County,

March 11, 1987

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Costello, Cooney & Fearon*for plaintiff. *Evans, Severn, Bankert & Peet*for defendant.

OPINION OF THE COURT

John R. Tenney, J.

Plaintiff seeks an order pursuant to CPLR 7102 to permit the Sheriff to seize a chattel (a farm tool) in defendant’s possession. It appears that plaintiff sold the chattel to one Zabele. It filed a UCC 1 financing statement which described the chattel as follows: "1 u noble 7 shank chisel plow 101278”. The chattel in defendant’s possession, purchased from Zabele, contains an identification plate which states:

*924"LEAR SIEGLER INC.

Noble Division

"CHISEL TILLAGE TOOL

"Type 0330000 Serial No. 0001555”

CPLR 7102 (c) requires that plaintiff demonstrate his entitlement to possession of the chattel and subdivision (d) requires that the court must first make a "finding that it is probable the plaintiff will succeed on the merits”. Plaintiff’s probability of success on the merits hinges on whether or not the erroneous description of the chattel, contained in UCC 1, is nevertheless sufficient under UCC 9-402. Under subdivision (8) of that section, a description is effective even if "it contains minor errors which are not seriously misleading” to the third-party purchaser.

Section 9-402 does not require exactitude in describing the collateral. Its purpose is to "put the public generally on notice of a prior interest in collateral so that inquiry can be made”. *(Bank of Utica v Smith Richfield Springs,*58 Misc 2d 113, 114.) Thus, some very general descriptions have been held sufficient for purpose of inquiry notice. *(E.g., Girard Trust Corn Exch. Bank v Lepley Ford,*13 Pa D & C 2d 119, 1 UCC Rep Serv 500 [CP 1957] ["passenger and commercial automobiles” held satisfactory]; *Matter of Fibre Glass Boat Corp.,*324 F Supp 1054, 1055 [" 'all inventory used in the production of boats’ ” held satisfactory].) Had the only discrepancy in this case been between the narrative descriptions, plaintiff would likely prevail.

However, here plaintiff attempted to be more exact by including the serial number, but failed. As the court stated in *In re Aragon Indus.*(14 UCC Rep Serv 1218, 1221-1222 [US Dist Ct, SD Fla 1973]): "[W]here a secured party * * * make[s] use of serial numbers [in describing collateral] in a multiple item transaction, it runs the risk of subjecting its security interest to attack if it does so incorrectly.” Here, the serial numbers are not even close and a person, reviewing UCC 1, would not be required to make inquiry of plaintiff as to its interest in the chattel. Thus, plaintiff has not demonstrated a probability of success and its request for relief must be denied.
#### In the Matter of Benjamin Knower, as Executor, etc.

Decree modified as directed in opinion.

Opinion by

Brady, J.
### MANDATE



## Court of Appeals

**First District of Texas**

NO. 01

- 13

- 00458

- CR

WILLIAM SOLOMON LEWI S , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

Appeal from the 239th District Court of Brazoria County. (Tr. Ct. No. 59246 ).

TO THE 239TH DISTRICT COURT OF BRAZORIA COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court , on the 6th day of March 2014 , the ca se upon appeal to revise or to

reverse your order was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

This case is an appeal from the appealable order signed

by the trial court on May 9, 2013. After submitting the case on

the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by the

par ties, the Court holds that the trial court’s order contains no

reversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirms the trial

court’s order.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below

for observance.

Judgment rendered March 6, 2014.

Panel cons ists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Sharp.Opinion delivered by Justice Higley.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order o f our said Court in

this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

January 30, 2015

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

CLERK OF THE COURT
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FAN JIN,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 14-72785

Agency No. A088-111-374

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 14, 2016**

Before: BEA, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Fan Jin, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of 

Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s 

decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief 

under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** We deny Jin’s request for oral argument and unanimously conclude 

this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 

34(a)(2).

FILED

JUN 22 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 14-72785 

8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual 

findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility determinations 

created by the REAL ID Act, Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039-40 (9th Cir.

2010). We deny the petition for review.

We do not consider the materials Jin references in his opening brief that are 

not part of the administrative record. See Fisher v. INS, 79 F.3d 955, 963-64 (9th 

Cir. 1996) (en banc).

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination 

based on inconsistencies within Jin’s testimony and within the record evidence as 

to his introduction to Christianity, and on inconsistencies between Jin’s testimony 

and record evidence as to his places of residence. See Shrestha, 590 F.3d at 1048 

(adverse credibility determination was reasonable under the “totality of 

circumstances.”). Jin’s explanations for the inconsistencies do not compel a 

contrary result. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1245 (9th Cir. 2000). In the 

absence of credible testimony, Jin’s asylum and withholding of removal claims 

fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003). 

Finally, Jin’s CAT claim also fails because it is based on the same testimony 

the agency found not credible, and the record does not otherwise compel the 
 3 14-72785 

conclusion that it is more likely than not he would be tortured if returned to China. 

See id. at 1156-57.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
## Summary Measures and Graphs

- Individual Provisions
- Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable)

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						E3.6: Increase the taxable maximum each year by an additional 2 percent beginning in 2026 until taxable earnings equal 90 percent of covered earnings. Do not provide benefit credit for additional earnings taxed.**

|  |  |
|--|--|
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection withthe quarterly report of bebe stores, inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended April 5, 2008, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gregory Scott, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,based on my knowledge:

 

(1)  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)  or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: May 15,  2008 | /s/ Gregory Scott       |
|---------------------------|-------------------------|
|                      | Gregory Scott           |
|                      | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3873 

AN ACT 

To designate the outdoor amphitheater at the Blue Ridge 

Music Center in Galax, Virginia, as the ‘‘Rick Boucher 

Amphitheater’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 3873 ES

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF THE RICK BOUCHER AMPHI2 THEATER. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The outdoor amphitheater at the 

4 Blue Ridge Music Center, located at 700 Foothills Road, 

5 Galax, Virginia, a facility within the Blue Ridge Parkway, 

6 which is a unit of the National Park System, shall be 

7 known and designated as the ‘‘Rick Boucher Amphi8 theater’’. 

9 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg10 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

11 States to the outdoor amphitheater referred to in sub12 section (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Rick 

13 Boucher Amphitheater’’. 

Passed the Senate December 22, 2022. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3873 

AN ACT 

To designate the outdoor amphitheater at the Blue 

‘‘Rick Boucher Amphitheater’’. Ridge Music Center in Galax, Virginia, as the
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 36 (Thursday, February 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10074-10075]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4353]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP95-102-001]


Texas Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

February 16, 1995.
    Take notice that on February 13, 1995, Texas Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Texas Gas) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Tariff, 
First Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets:

Effective February 1, 1995

Substitute Fifth Revised Seventh Revised Sheet No. 10
Substitute Fifth Revised Fourth Revised Sheet No. 11
Substitute Third Revised First Revised Sheet No. 11.1
Substitute First Revised First Revised Sheet No. 15
Substitute First Revised First Revised Sheet No. 16

Effective March 1, 1995

Substitute Sixth Revised Seventh Revised Sheet No. 10
Substitute Sixth Revised Fourth Revised Sheet No. 11
Substitute Fourth Revised First Revised Sheet No. 11.1

      and;
a revised Statement in compliance with the provisions in Docket No. 
RP95-102 as directed in the ``Order Accepting and Suspending Tariff 
Sheets Subject to Refund and Conditions'' issued January 27, 1995 (70 
FERC 61,088).
    Texas Gas states that the filing contains a revised statement 
reflecting:
    (1) The aggregate amount of Gas Supply Realignment Costs incurred 
and allocated to be collected during the twelve-month period November 
1, 1993, through October 31, 1994, from Rate Schedule IT; and
    (2) The aggregate amount of Gas Supply Realignment Costs deemed 
collected during the same period by Texas Gas under Rate Schedule IT, 
as determined pursuant to Section 33.3(g) of the General Terms and 
Conditions of Texas Gas's FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1.
    Additionally, the filing reflects an Interruptible Revenue Credit 
Adjustment which proposes to reduce base rates under Rate Schedules FT, 
NNS, and SGT, effective February 1, 1995.
    Texas Gas states that copies of the instant filing are being mailed 
to Texas Gas's jurisdictional customers and interested state 
commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol 
Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sec. 385.211 of 
the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests 
[[Page 10075]] should be filed on or before February 24, 1995. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-4353 Filed 2-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov |  | **Search**  |
|------------------------|--|------------------|

| Actuarial Publications | Summary of Provisions That Would Change the Social Security Program |
|------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Solvency Provisions | Description of Proposed Provisions:              Cost-of-Living Adjustment |
|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of         the 2008 Trustees Report*

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified July 16, 2008 |
Exhibit 10.2


 


 


 


 


December 22, 2022


 


Ms. Lynda Chervil


Chief Executive Officer


Internet Sciences, Inc.


521 Fifth Avenue, 17th Floor


New York, NY 10175


 


Dear Lynda,


 


Based on the vote of shareholders, I hereby resign from the Board of
Directors of Internet Sciences, Inc effective end of day December 31, 2022..


 


I wish you the best in your efforts to continue developing the company.


 


Sincerely,


 


/s/ Vanessa Willams


 


Vanessa Williams
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3813 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3813

 To amend the Federal Credit Union Act to exclude extensions of credit 
    made to veterans from the definition of a member business loan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 10 (legislative day, March 7), 2022

  Mr. Sullivan (for himself and Ms. Hirono) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, 
                       Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Federal Credit Union Act to exclude extensions of credit 
    made to veterans from the definition of a member business loan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Member Business Loan Act''.

SEC. 2. MEMBER BUSINESS LOAN DEFINITION.

    (a) In General.--Section 107A(c) of the Federal Credit Union Act 
(12 U.S.C. 1757a(c)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)(B)--
                    (A) in clause (iv), by striking ``or'' at the end;
                    (B) in clause (v), by striking the period and 
                inserting ``; or''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
                            ``(vi) made to a veteran;'';
            (2) in paragraph (2)(B)(ii), by striking ``and'' at the 
        end;
            (3) in paragraph (3), by striking the period and inserting 
        ``; and''; and
            (4) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(4) the term `veteran' has the meaning given the term in 
        section 101 of title 38, United States Code.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Detailed Single Year Tables |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Payroll Tax Rates | Description of Proposed Provision:      Raise payroll tax rates (for employees and employers combined) by 1.8 percentage points in 2009 and later |
|-------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                   |

       Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program                Percentage of taxable payroll           Trust fundratio as ofJanuary 1CalendaryearCostrateIncomerateAnnualbalance 200811.2012.771.57 359200911.2614.613.34 369201011.3614.623.26 393201111.5314.643.12 416201211.7614.672.91 436201312.0314.702.68 453201412.3114.722.40 467201512.6114.742.13 478201612.9214.761.84 487201713.2314.791.55 494201813.5314.811.28 500201913.8314.830.99 503202014.1314.840.71 506202114.4114.860.45 507202214.6814.880.20 507202314.9414.90-0.05 507202415.1914.91-0.28 505202515.4314.93-0.50 503202615.6514.94-0.71 499202715.8614.96-0.90 495202816.0614.97-1.09 490202916.2414.98-1.26 485203016.4014.99-1.41 479203116.5415.00-1.53 474203216.6515.01-1.64 468203316.7415.02-1.72 462203416.8015.02-1.77 456203516.8415.03-1.81 450203616.8615.03-1.83 445203716.8715.03-1.84 440203816.8715.04-1.83 435203916.8415.04-1.81 430204016.8115.03-1.77 426204116.7715.03-1.74 422204216.7315.03-1.70 418204316.6915.03-1.66 414204416.6515.03-1.62 410204516.6215.03-1.59 407204616.5915.03-1.56 403204716.5615.03-1.53 400204816.5415.03-1.51 396204916.5315.03-1.50 393205016.5215.03-1.49 389205116.5215.03-1.49 386205216.5215.03-1.49 382205316.5315.03-1.50 378205416.5415.03-1.51 373205516.5615.03-1.53 369205616.5815.04-1.55 364205716.6115.04-1.57 359205816.6415.04-1.59 354205916.6615.04-1.62 349206016.6815.04-1.64 343206116.7115.05-1.66 337206216.7415.05-1.69 331206316.7615.05-1.71 325206416.7915.05-1.73 319206516.8215.05-1.76 313206616.8515.06-1.79 306206716.8815.06-1.82 299206816.9115.06-1.85 291206916.9415.06-1.88 284207016.9815.06-1.92 276207117.0215.07-1.95 268207217.0615.07-1.99 260207317.1015.07-2.03 251207417.1415.07-2.06 242207517.1815.08-2.10 233207617.2215.08-2.14 223207717.2615.08-2.18 214207817.3115.08-2.22 204207917.3515.09-2.27 193208017.4015.09-2.31 182208117.4515.09-2.35 171208217.4915.09-2.40 160208317.5415.10-2.44 148208417.5815.10-2.48 136208517.6315.10-2.53 123Summarized RatesYearsCostrateIncomerateActuarialbalance         Change inactuarialbalance Estimates based on the Intermediate Assumptions                         of the 2008 Trustees Report2008-208215.63%15.70% 0.07% 1.77% Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified August 11, 2008
#### SAMUEL RAYBURN et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS et al.

Division One,

June 1, 1911.

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court.— *Hon. Matt G. Reynolds,*Judge.

Dismissed.

*Geo. S. Grover*for appellants.

*L. E. Walther*and *T. P. Yoimg*for respondents.

WOODSON, J.

— There is no difference in the facts of this case, and the case of Hicks v. City of St. Louis, the opinion in which, has just been handed down, and which is reported at page 647. The holding in that case is conclusive of this. The appeal must therefore be dismissed, and it is so ordered.

All concur.
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 28 (Thursday, February 11, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7352-7353]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02708]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.


[[Page 7353]]


    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel Age-Related Hearing Loss.
    Date: March 9, 2016.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, Suite 
2C212, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Kimberly Firth, Ph.D., National Institutes of 
Health, National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-7702, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#33555a41475b585e735e525a5f1d5d5a5b1d545c45"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e5838c97918d8e88a588848c89cb8b8c8dcb828a93">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: February 5, 2016.
Melanie J. Gray,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-02708 Filed 2-10-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>