alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 23

- 00320

- CR

M IKE Z AFF

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 211th District

Court

of Denton County ( F18

- 2408

- 431 )

August 8, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Elizabeth Kerr

Justice Elizabeth Kerr
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 373 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 373

  To strengthen the use of patient-experience data within the benefit-
               risk framework for approval of new drugs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 23, 2021

  Mr. Wicker (for himself and Ms. Klobuchar) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To strengthen the use of patient-experience data within the benefit-
               risk framework for approval of new drugs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Better Empowerment Now to Enhance 
Framework and Improve Treatments Act of 2021'' or the ``BENEFIT Act of 
2021''.

SEC. 2. STRENGTHENING THE USE OF PATIENT-EXPERIENCE DATA WITHIN 
              BENEFIT-RISK FRAMEWORK.

    Section 569C of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 
360bbb-8c) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``; and'' and 
                inserting a semicolon;
                    (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period and 
                inserting ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(C) as part of the risk-benefit assessment 
                framework in the new drug approval process described in 
                section 505(d), considering relevant patient-focused 
                drug development data, such as data from patient 
                preference studies (benefit-risk), patient reported 
                outcome data, or patient experience data, developed by 
                the sponsor of an application or another party.''; and
            (2) in subsection (b)(1), by inserting ``, including a 
        description of how such data and information were considered in 
        the risk benefit assessment described in section 505(d)'' 
        before the period.
                                 <all>
```
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable) | Description of Proposed Provision:      Apply 2 percent payroll tax rate on earnings over $400,000 in 2017, with the $400,000 threshold wage-indexed after 2017.  Give proportional benefit credit for additional earnings in AIME for benefit computation. |
|-------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                           |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2009 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified May 14, 2010 |
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual Balance 

in 75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

B

7

-1.70% -4.20% 0.27% 0.16% -1.43% 

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2008 Trustees Report Office of the Chief A

July 16, 2008

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Taxation of Benefits

Proposed Provision: Tax Social Security benefits in a manner similar to private pension inc2009. Phase out the lower-income thresholds during 2009-2018.

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this 

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

0.02.04.06.08.0

10.012.014.016.018.020.0

2008 2018 2028 2038 2048 2058 2068 2078

Year

Percent

Cost rates with this provisionCost rates under present lawIncome rates with this provisionIncome rates under present law

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

 (assets as a percentage of annual expe

0

100200300400500600700800900

1000

2008 2018 2028 2038 2048 2058 

Year

Percent

Present law With this p
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Tennessee Valley Authority

## Meeting No. 16-01

                    The TVA Board of Directors will hold a public meeting on February 11, 2016, in the Missionary Ridge Auditorium of the Chattanooga Office Complex, 1101 Market Street, Chattanooga, Tennessee. The public may comment on any agenda item or subject at a                     *public listening session*                     which begins at 8:30 a.m. (ET). Following the end of the public listening session, the meeting will be called to order to consider the agenda items listed below. On-site registration will be available until 15 minutes before the public listening session begins at 8:30 a.m. (ET). Preregistered speakers will address the Board first. TVA management will answer questions from the news media following the Board meeting.                

Status: Open.

### Agenda

Chair's Welcome

#### Old Business

Approval of minutes of the November 20, 2015, Board Meeting

#### New Business

1. Report from President and CEO

2. Governance Items

A. Committee Charters

B. Board Practice on Confidential Information

3. Report of the Audit, Risk, and Regulation Committee

A. Regulation of Pole Attachment Fees

4. Report of the Finance, Rates, and Portfolio Committee

5. Report of the Nuclear Oversight Committee

6. Report of the External Relations Committee

7. Report of the People and Performance Committee

A. Chair Selection

8. Information Items

A. Kingston Insurance Arbitration Settlement

B. Watts Bar Unit 2 Capital Project Budget Increase

C. Vehicular Accident Litigation Settlement

*For more information:*                     Please call TVA Media Relations at (865) 632-6000, Knoxville, Tennessee. People who plan to attend the meeting and have special needs should call (865) 632-6000. Anyone who wishes to comment on any of the agenda in writing may send their comments to: TVA Board of Directors, Board Agenda Comments, 400 West Summit Hill Drive, Knoxville, Tennessee 37902.                

Dated: February 4, 2016.

Sherry A. Quirk,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2016-02646 Filed 2-5-16; 11:15 am]

 BILLING CODE 8120-08-P
#### STATE v. ALFRED BARNES.

(Filed 23 November, 1955.)

1. Criminal Daw § 53p—

The charge oí the court as to the duty of the jury to make a diligent effort to arrive at a verdict *held*proper.

2. Criminal Raw § 54f—

The spontaneous statement of onp of the jurors when the jury returned to the courtroom that the jury stood ten for conviction and two for acquittal *held*innocuous.

Appeal by defendant from *Gwyn, J.,*April Term, 1955, Richmond. No error.

Criminal prosecution in which the bill of indictment is laid under' G.S. 14-33 (b) (3).

The defendant, a male person over eighteen years of age, was convicted of an assault upon his wife. There was judgment on the verdict, and defendant appealed.

*Attorney-General Rodman and Assistant Attorney-General McGal-liard for the State.*

*Joe M. Cox for defendant appellant.*

PeR Cukiam.

This case is essentially a controversy as to the facts. The jury, having heard the sharply conflicting testimony, resolved the issue against the defendant. His assignments of error fail to point out prejudicial error in the trial which would justify a new trial. The charge of the court as to the duty of the jury to make a diligent effort to arrive at a verdict was well within the bounds of the decisions of this Court. *S. v.*Pugh, 183 N.C. 800, 111 S.E. 849; *S. v. Brodie,*190 N.C. 554, 130 S.E. 205; *S. v. Lefevers,*216 N.C. 494, 5 S.E. 2d 552. The spontaneous statement of one of the jurors when the jury returned to the courtroom that the jury stood ten for conviction and two for acquittal was innocuous. In the trial below we find

No error.
EXHIBIT 32

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (the
Trust) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of
the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Trust.



|              |  |  |  |    |  |                                        
|------------- |  |  |  | -- |  | ---------------------------------------
|              |  |  |  |    |  | Bank of America, N.A.,                 
|              |  |  |  |    |  | Trustee for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
|              |  |  | 
|March 8, 2013 |  |  |  | By |  | /S/ NANCY G. WILLIS                    
|              |  |  |  |    |  | Nancy G. Willis                        
|              |  |  |  |    |  | Vice President
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT

To the Board of Directors
SEMX Corporation


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (No. 33-84752, No. 33-95762 and No. 333-7797) on Form S-8 of our
report dated February 3, 2001, on the consolidated balance sheet of SEMX
Corporation and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, which report
appears in the December 31, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K of SEMX Corporation.


GOLDSTEIN GOLUB KESSLER LLP
New York, New York

March 22, 2001
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3606 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3606

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to eliminate the requirement to 
  specify an effective period of a transfer of Post-9/11 educational 
           assistance to a dependent, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF REQUIREMENT TO SPECIFY AN EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF 
              A TRANSFER OF POST-9/11 EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE TO A 
              DEPENDENT.

    Section 3319(e) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by adding ``and'' after the 
        semicolon;
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``; and'' and inserting a 
        period; and
            (3) by striking paragraph (3).

            Passed the Senate August 4, 2022.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
117th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3606

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend title 38, United States Code, to eliminate the requirement to 
  specify an effective period of a transfer of Post-9/11 educational 
           assistance to a dependent, and for other purposes.
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

       CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NASB Financial, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, David H. Hancock, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.


May 8, 2009                By: /s/ David H. Hancock
                               David H. Hancock
                               Chairman and Chief
                                 Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to NASB Financial, Inc. and will be retained by NASB
Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.


This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for
any other purpose.

<Page>
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk August 6, 2009

d0720 

# Order

August 6, 2009

137911

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137911 COA: 287753 Genesee CC: 03-011359-FH JOBEY HENDERSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 17, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9692]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4118]



[[Page 9692]]

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Meeting of 
the National Center on Sleep Disorders Research Advisory Board

    Pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, notice is hereby given of the meeting 
of the National Center on Sleep Disorders Research Advisory Board, 
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, March 15, 1995. This meeting 
will beheld at the National Institutes of Health, Building 31, 
Conference Room 10, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
    The entire meeting will open to the public from 9:00 a.m. to 
adjournment, to discuss recommendations on the implementation and 
evaluation of the National Center on Sleep Disorders Research programs. 
Attendance by the public will be limited to space available.
    Ms. Terry Long, Chief, Communications and Public Information 
Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Building 31, Room 
4A21, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, (301) 496-4236, will provide a summary 
of the meetings and a roster of the Board members.
    Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as 
sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should 
contact the Executive Secretary in advance of the meeting.
    Dr. James P. Kiley, Executive Secretary and Acting Director, 
National Center on Sleep Disorders Research, NHLBI, Building 31, Room 
4A11, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, (301) 496-7443, will furnish 
substantive program information.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.838, Lung 
Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health).

    Dated: February 14, 1995.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Office, NIH.
[FR Doc. 95-4118 Filed 2-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 12-3216

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

David Jerome Tensley, Jr.

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport

____________

 Submitted: May 24, 2013

Filed: May 31, 2013

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, MELLOY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.
David Tensley directly appeals the sentence the district court1

 imposed after

revoking his supervised release. His counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a

brief questioning the substantive reasonableness of Tensley’s revocation sentence.

Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not impose a

substantively unreasonable revocation sentence. SeeUnited States v. Miller, 557 F.3d

910, 915-16 (8th Cir. 2009) (discussing standards and procedures for reviewing

district court’s sentencing decision upon revocation of supervised release). 

Accordingly, we affirm. We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________

1

The Honorable John A. Jarvey, United States District Judge for the Southern

District of Iowa.

-2-
EXHIBIT C 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4758-3 Filed: 11/15/19 Entered: 11/15/19 10:11:43 Page 1

of 2
Exhibit C

Voluntary Rate Disclosures 

Below is a comparison of the blended hourly rate (billed amount / billed hours) by timekeeper 

category that was billed to the Debtors during the Fee Period and that was billed on all other 

matters during the period from October 1, 2018 through September 30, 2019. 

Fees Billed by date Worked 

Timekeeper Category 

Blended Hourly Rates 

 Billed in this 

Fee Application 

6/1/19-9/30/19 

(PG&E Timekeepers) 

Billed to clients other 

than PGE 

10/1/18-9/30/19 

(All MTO Timekeepers)

Partner $ 1,112 $ 921 

Of Counsel $ 890 $ 828 

Associate $ 635 $ 597 

eDiscovery Atty $ 575 $ 512 

Staff Counsel $ 421 $ 380 

Attorneys Total $ 687 $ 724 

ALS $ 409 $ 346 

Paralegal $ 349 $ 278 

Library $ 245 $ 145 

Litigation Analyst $ 110 $ 101 

Case Clerks $ 110 $ 99 

Paraprofessionals Total $ 387 $ 276 

Grand Total $ 658 $ 658 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4758-3 Filed: 11/15/19 Entered: 11/15/19 10:11:43 Page 2

of 2
##### 



EXHIBIT 11.1
 COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
(unaudited)
 Three Months Ended
    
    Six Months EndedApril 30,
    
    April 30,2006
    
    2007
    
    2006
    
    2007Numerator:Net (loss)
    
    $
    (1,928,313
    )
    
    $
    (292,999
    )
    
    $
    (2,759,197
    )
    
    $
    (1,429,154
    )Denominator:Denominator for basic earnings per
share- weighted-average shares
    
    
    14,098,542
    
    
    
    14,275,372
    
    
    
    14,073,747
    
    
    
    14,268,627Effect of dilutive securities:Employee stock options
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Warrants
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Denominator for diluted earnings
per share adjusted
weighted-average shares and
assumed conversions
    
    
    14,098,542
    
    
    
    14,275,372
    
    
    
    14,073,747
    
    
    
    14,268,627Basic and diluted (loss) per share:Basic and diluted (loss) per share
    
    $
    (0.14
    )
    
    $
    (0.02
    )
    
    $
    (0.20
    )
    
    $
    (0.10
    )