alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 36 (Thursday, February 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 10142]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4440]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Maritime Administration
[Docket S-918]


American President Lines, Ltd.; Notice of Application for a 
Waiver of Section 804(a) of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936, as amended, 
To Permit Foreign-Flag Slot Charters

    American President Lines, Ltd. (APL), by application dated February 
10, 1995, requests waiver of the provisions of section 804 of the 
Merchant Marine Act, 1936, as amended, (Act), for foreign-flag slot 
charters by APL on vessels of Orient Overseas Container Line Inc. 
(OOCL) and Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd. (MOL) pursuant to APL's 
participation in a reciprocal slot exchange and coordinated sailing 
agreement, designated Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) No. 203-011468, 
and in a Master Slot Charger Agreement, both among APL, OOCL, and MOL.
    APL is currently a party to a reciprocal slot exchange and 
coordinated sailing agreement, designated FMC No. 203-011340 (AO-SEA) 
and a Master Slot Charter Agreement, both between APL and OOCL. APL has 
been operating under those agreements since originally granted a 
section 804 waiver September 27, 1991.
    The new agreements which are the subject of the current application 
would replace the AO-SEA agreements. The replacement agreement, the 
APL/MOL/OOCL Asia-Pacific Alliance Agreement (A-PAC Agreement) and the 
Master Slot Charter Agreement (MSCA) are substantially similar to the 
AO-SEA agreements, and are, in effect, a continuation of the AO-SEA 
agreements, with the addition of one new partner--MOL--and an increase 
in the number of line haul strings from five to six.
    This application may be inspected in the Office of the Secretary, 
Maritime Administration. Any person, firm, or corporation having any 
interest in such request within the meaning of section 804 of the Act 
and desiring to submit comments concerning the application must file 
written comments in triplicate with the Secretary, Maritime 
Administration, Room 7210, Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street SW., 
Washington, D.C. 20590. Comments must be received no later than 5:00 
p.m. on March 8, 1995. This notice is published as a matter of 
discretion and publication should in no way be considered a favorable 
or unfavorable decision on the application, as filed or as may be 
amended. The Maritime Administrator will consider any comments 
submitted and take such action with respect thereto as may be deemed 
appropriate.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 20.804 
(Operating-Differential Subsidies)).

    By Order of the Maritime Administrator.

    Dated: February 17, 1995.
Joel C. Richard,
Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. 95-4440 Filed 2-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-81-P
#### SALLIE MITCHELL v. HOME SECURITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.

(Filed 26 April, 1933.)

Insurance N a—

A “facility ef payment” clause in a policy of life insurance which provides for discharge of the insurer by payment to the executor or administrator of the insured, any relative by blood or marriage, or to any other person appearing to the company to be equitably entitled thereto by reason of having incurred expense on account of illness or death of the insured, is valid.

Civil actioN, before *Moore, Special Judge,*at January Term, 1933, of Wake.

On 31 August, 1925, the defendant issued a policy of life insurance upon the life of Henry Jones for $250.00. On 23 April, 1928, an endorsement was stamped on the policy changing the beneficiary to Sallie Mitchell. On 31 August, 1929, the insured, Henry Jones, made application to the defendant to name Hattie Grimes as beneficiary in said policy. In the application for change the insured certified “that the above described policy is destroyed or lost and hereby applies for duplicate.” The defendant accepted notice of change but never made an endorsement on the policy for the reason that the policy was never delivered for such purpose. Henry Jones died about September, 1929. The evidence tended to show that the insured owed Sallie Mitchell certain money, and that she had paid the premiums on the policy and had possession of same. The evidence further tended to show that the insured boarded with Hattie Grimes, for several months prior to his death, and that she took care of him during his last illness. At his death he owed her $136.11, and Hampton Bonner and Sons, undertakers, buried the insured, and their bill was $122.50. The defendant paid the proceeds of the policy to Hattie Grimes and Hampton Bonner and Sons in full settlement of all liability under the policy. Such payment was made by virtue of the “Facility of Payment” clause in the policy, the pertinent portion of which is as follows: “The company may make payment to the executor or administrator of said insured, or to any relative by blood or connection by marriage, or to any other person appearing to the company to be equitably entitled to the same by reason of having incurred expense on account of illness or death of the insured, and the receipt of any such person shall be conclusive evidence that payment has been made to the person or persons entitled thereto, and that the claims under this policy have been fully satisfied.”

The trial judge instructed the jury to answer the issue in favor of defendant. From judgment upon the verdict the plaintiff appealed.

*594
      *A. W. Cra/wley for plaintiff.*

*Thomas W. Ruffin for defendant.*

Per Oukiam.

A clause in an insurance policy of similar wording and import, to that in the case at bar, was held to be valid in *Walser v. Ins. Co.,*175 N. C., 350, 95 S. E., 542. The decision in that case is determinative. See, also, *Woolen v. Order of Odd Fellows,*176 N. C., 52, 96 S. E., 654.

Affirmed.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21
- 6245

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. QUINCY ANDRE JONES , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Malcolm J. Howard , Senior District Judge. ( 5:16

- cr - 00152

- H

- 1; 5:19

- cv - 00317

- H )

Submitted : May 25, 2021 Decided: May 28, 2021

Before DIAZ and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Quincy Andre Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Quincy Andre Jones seeks t o appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 225 5 motion . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)( B ). A certificate of appealability will no t issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists c ould find the distri ct court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v.
Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural rulin g is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473,
484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jones has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Jones’ motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the m aterials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 37 (Friday, February 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 10403]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4575]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[ID-942-04-1420-00]


Filing of Plats of Survey; Idaho

    The plats of the following described land were officially filed in 
the Idaho State Office, Bureau of Land Management, Boise, Idaho, 
effective 9:00 a.m., February 16, 1995.
    The plat representing the dependent resurvey of portions of the 
west boundary and subdivisional lines, and subdivision of sections 19, 
20, 29, and 30, T. 15 S., R. 45 E., of the Boise Meridian, Idaho, Group 
No. 891, was accepted, February 13, 1995.
    This survey was executed to meet certain administrative needs of 
the Bureau of Land Management.
    The plat representing the dependent resurvey of the west boundary, 
subdivisional lines, subdivision of sections 19 and 20, certain tracts, 
and the 1912 meanders of the right bank of the Kootenai River, a metes-
and-bounds survey and meanders of the 1994 right bank of the Kootenai 
River, T. 62 N., R. 1 E., Boise Meridian, Idaho, Group No. 905, was 
accepted, February 14, 1995.
    This survey was executed to meet certain administrative needs of 
the Bureau of Indian Affairs.
    All inquiries concerning the survey of the above described land 
must be sent to the Chief, Branch of Cadastral Survey, Idaho State 
Office, Bureau of Land Management, 3380 Americana Terrace, Boise, 
Idaho, 83706.

    Dated: February 16, 1995.
Duane E. Olsen,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor for Idaho.
[FR Doc. 95-4575 Filed 2-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9718]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4100]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
[AC-16; OTS No. 02025]


The Cameron Savings and Loan Association, F.A., Cameron, 
Missouri; Approval of Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on February 10, 1995, the Deputy 
Assistant Director, Corporate Activities, Office of Thrift Supervision, 
or her designee, acting pursuant to delegated authority, approved the 
application of The Cameron Savings and Loan Association, F.A., Cameron, 
Missouri, to convert to the stock form of organization. Copies of the 
application are available for inspection at the Information Services 
Division, Office of Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street, N.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20552, and the Midwest Regional Office, Office of 
Thrift Supervision, 122 W. John Carpenter Freeway, Suite 600, Irving, 
Texas 75039.

    Dated: February 14, 1995.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Nadine Y. Washington,
Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-4100 Filed 2-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF INTEGRATED INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. AS OF
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000, AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS OF INTEGRATED
INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC., FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,774
<SECURITIES>                                    51,513
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,621
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,933
<INVENTORY>                                        302
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                69,321
<PP&E>                                          30,833
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,983
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  98,889
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,840
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            21
<OTHER-SE>                                      82,292
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    98,889
<SALES>                                         43,171
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                43,171
<CGS>                                           24,659
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,659
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,398
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,715
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,171)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,171)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,171)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.49)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> CT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 312,432
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,481
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   312,432
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,499
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,761)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  3,017
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,344)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3770 

To establish a point of order against legislation that would cause a net 

increase in outlays unless the Director of the Congressional Budget 

Office certifies that inflation is below 3 percent. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 7, 2022 

Mr. LEE (for himself and Mr. SCOTT of Florida) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget 

A BILL 

To establish a point of order against legislation that would 

cause a net increase in outlays unless the Director of 

the Congressional Budget Office certifies that inflation 

is below 3 percent. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preventing Runaway 

5 Inflation in Consumer Expenditures Act’’ or the ‘‘PRICE 

6 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3770 IS

1 SEC. 2. POINT OF ORDER AGAINST LEGISLATION THAT 

2 WOULD CAUSE A NET INCREASE IN OUTLAYS 

3 UNLESS THE DIRECTOR OF THE CONGRES4 SIONAL BUDGET OFFICE CERTIFIES THAT IN5 FLATION IS BELOW 3 PERCENT. 

6 (a) POINT OF ORDER.—It shall not be in order in 

7 the Senate to consider any bill, joint resolution, motion, 

8 amendment, amendment between the Houses, or con9 ference report that would cause a net increase in outlays 

10 relative to the most recently published Congressional 

11 Budget Office baseline unless the Director of the Congres12 sional Budget Office certifies (based on the most recent 

13 data available to the Director) that inflation, as measured 

14 in either the average of the annualized changes in the 3 

15 most recently published monthly reports on the consumer 

16 price index for all-urban consumers published by the Bu17 reau of Labor Statistics of the Department of Labor, or 

18 the previous year’s unadjusted annual change in that 

19 index, is below 3 percent. 

20 (b) WAIVER AND APPEAL.—Subsection (a) may be 

21 waived or suspended in the Senate only by an affirmative 

22 vote of three-fifths of the Members, duly chosen and 

23 sworn. An affirmative vote of three-fifths of the Members 

24 of the Senate, duly chosen and sworn, shall be required 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3770 IS

1 to sustain an appeal of the ruling of the Chair on a point 

2 of order raised under subsection (a). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 0.09 0.13 3% 3%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

September 15, 2023

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Family Members

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: D2. The current spouse benefit is based on 50 percent of the PIA of the other 

spouse. Reduce this percent each year by 1 percentage point beginning with newly eligible spouses in 

2024, until the percent reaches 33 in 2040.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 38 (Monday, February 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 10614]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4662]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Advisory Committee for Engineering; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Advisory Committee for Engineering.
    Date and Time: March 20 and 21, 1995: 8:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m.
    Place: NSF, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 530, Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Ken Chong, Program Director, Structural 
Systems and Construction Process Program, Dr. Priscilla Nelson, 
Program Director, Geomechanical, Geotechnical and Geo-Environmental 
Program, or Dr. John Scalzi, Program Director, Large Structural & 
Building Systems, Division of Civil and Mechanical Systems, Room 
545, NSF, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230 703/306-1361.
    Purpose of Meeting: To carry out Committee of Visitors (COV) 
review, including examination of decisions on proposals, reviewer 
comments, and other privileged materials.
    Agenda: The combined programs of Structures, Geomechanical and 
Building Systems will convene a Committee of Visitors to review the 
programs.
    Reason for Closing: The meeting is closed to the public because 
the Committee is reviewing proposal actions that will include 
privileged intellectual property and personal information that could 
harm individuals if they were disclosed. If discussions were open to 
the public, these matters that are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4) 
and (6) of the Government Sunshine Act would be improperly 
disclosed.

    Dated: February 21, 1995.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-4662 Filed 2-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3473 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3473

 To authorize funding for the Research, Demonstration, and Evaluation 
Center for the Aging Network in order to demonstrate the impact of the 
 aging network on the health and independence of older individuals and 
     to foster innovation in such network, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 11 (legislative day, January 10), 2022

  Mr. King (for himself and Mr. Casey) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize funding for the Research, Demonstration, and Evaluation 
Center for the Aging Network in order to demonstrate the impact of the 
 aging network on the health and independence of older individuals and 
     to foster innovation in such network, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Innovation in Aging Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE RESEARCH, 
              DEMONSTRATION, AND EVALUATION CENTER FOR THE AGING 
              NETWORK.

    There is authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2022 to the 
Assistant Secretary for Aging such sums as may be necessary for the 
Research, Demonstration, and Evaluation Center for the Aging Network to 
carry out the activities of the Center under section 201(g) of the 
Older Americans Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 3011(g)).
                                 <all>
```
**MP** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 18
- 0433 STATE OF MONTANA ,

Plaintiff and Appell ee , v. NATHAN MAHSEELAH ,

Defendant and Appel lant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 45
- day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including May 26 , 2020 , within which to prepare, serve, and file the State’s response .

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 8 2020

04/08/2020

Case Number: DA 18-0433
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Actuarial Publications | Summary of Provisions That Would Change the Social Security Program |
|------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Solvency Provisions | Description of Proposed Provisions:              Provisions Affecting Payroll Tax Rates |
|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of         the 2005 Trustees Report*

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map       Last reviewed or modified Tuesday Dec 11, 2007 |