alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Cost-of-Living Adjustment | Description of Proposed Provision:      Beginning December 2009, reduce cost-of-living adjustment for OASDI benefits by 0.5 percentage point |
|---------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                           |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2008 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified July 16, 2008 |
Skip to main content

# Social Security

Search
Menu
Español
Sign in

## The 2012 OASDI Trustees Report

Office of the Chief Actuary

Reading the Report

Table of ContentsList of TablesList of FiguresIndex

The 2012 OASDI Trustees Report, officially called       "*The 2012 Annual Report of the Board of Trustees of the Federal      Old-Age and Survivors Insurance and Federal Disability Insurance Trust Funds*,"      presents the current and projected financial status of the trust funds.      The report is available in PDF, a       printer-friendly format.

Requests for a printed copy of the 2012 Trustees Report may be submitted       by filling out our request form.

####     Related information 

Supplemental Single-Year Tables

**Documentation of Key Assumptions**
          -  	 Demographic assumptions  used in the projections that determine the actuarial status of the trust funds 	 
          -        Ultimate economic assumptions  used in the projections that determine the actuarial status of the trust funds	     

 See model documentation for a description of all assumptions and methods used in the projections. 

**Model Documentation**      Description of the methods used in the 
long      range projections
 that determine the actuarial status of the trust funds
Description of the methods used in the       
short range projections
 of      trust fund operations

**Related reports**- Summary of the latest report       for the Social Security and Medicare programs (also available in       printer-friendly  PDF )
Trustees Report on the       
financial      status of the Medicare program

Special reports on OASI or DI Trust Fund assets dropping below 20 percent of annual cost within 10 years:      
Letter to the President of the Senate
Letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives

Footer menu
EXHIBIT  99.2


                        NEOMETRIX TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


       In connection with the Annual Report of Neometrix technology Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending April 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Norman J. Birmingham, the Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ NORMAN J. BIRMINGHAM
------------------------
Norman J. Birmingham

Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
June 18, 2003
### **Exhibit 23.2**

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT ENGINEERS**

As independentengineering consultants, Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc. hereby consentsto the use of our report entitled “Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to theInterests of Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. in Domestic Oil and Gas Propertiesand to the Interests of Warrior Gas Company in the Gataga Gas Unit No. 5A,Vermejo (Ellenburger) Field, Loving County, Texas Effective December 31, 2006,for Disclosure to the Securities and Exchange Commission, Williamson Project 6.9185”dated March 8, 2007 and data extracted therefrom (and all references toour Firm) included in or made a part of this Form 10-K Annual Report tobe filed on or about March 16, 2007 and to the incorporation by referenceof this Form 10-K Annual Report (including the use of our report andreferences to our Firm herein) into that certain Registration Statement on FormS-3 filed by Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. with the Securities and ExchangeCommission, file number 333-116825, and those certain Registration Statementson Form S-8 filed by Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. with the Securities andExchange Commission, file numbers 33-68320, 33-68318, 33-68316,33-69688, and 33-92834 covering the Bonus Incentive Plan of ClaytonWilliams Energy, Inc., 1993 Stock Compensation Plan of Clayton Williams Energy,Inc., Outside Directors Stock Option Plan of Clayton Williams Energy, Inc.,Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. 401(k) Plan & Trust, and the ExecutiveIncentive Stock Compensation Plan of Clayton Williams Energy, Inc.,respectively.

WILLIAMSON PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS, INC.

Midland, Texas

March 16, 2007

----
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 8627]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3808]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Natural Resources Conservation Service


Pasture Creek Watershed, Montana; Notice of Intent to Deauthorize 
Federal Funding

AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service.

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act, 
Public Law 83-566, and the Natural Resources Conservation Service 
Guidelines (7 CFR Part 622), the Natural Resources Conservation Service 
gives notice of the intent to deauthorize Federal funding for the 
Pasture Creek Watershed project McCone County, Montana.
    For further information contact Shirley J. Elliott, Acting State 
Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 10 East 
Babcock Street, Room 443, Bozeman, Montana 59715, telephone: 406-587-
6814.

Pasture Creek Watershed, Montana; Notice of Intent to Deauthorize 
Federal Funding

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A determination has been made by Shirley J. 
Elliott that the proposed works of improvement for the Pasture Creek 
Watershed project will not be installed. The sponsoring local 
organizations have concurred in this determination and agree that 
Federal funding should be deauthorized for the project. Information 
regarding this determination may be obtained from Shirley J. Elliott, 
Acting State Conservationist, at the above address and telephone 
number.
    No administrative action on implementation of the proposed 
deauthorization will be taken until 60 days after the date of this 
publication in the Federal Register.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 10.904, 
Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention. Office of Management and 
Budget Circular A-95 regarding State and local clearinghouse review 
of Federal and federally assisted programs and projects is 
applicable.)

    Dated: February 6, 1995.

Shirley J. Elliott,
Acting State Conservationist.
[FR Doc. 95-3808 Filed 1-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-M
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable) | Description of Proposed Provision:      Apply 4 percent payroll tax rate on earnings over $400,000 in 2017, with the $400,000 threshold wage-indexed after 2017.  Give proportional benefit credit for additional earnings in AIME for benefit computation. |
|-------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                           |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2009 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified May 14, 2010 |
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 36 (Thursday, February 23, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 10149]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4635]





                Sunshine Act Meetings



Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 36 / Thursday, February 23, 1995 / 
Sunshine Act Meetings
[[Page 10149]] 




FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

Date and time: Tuesday, February 28, 1995 at 10:00 a.m.

Place: 999 E Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.

Status: This meeting will be closed to the public.

Items to be discussed:

Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. Sec. 437g.
Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. Sec. 437g, Sec. 438(b), and 
    Title 26, U.S.C.
Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
    arbitration.
Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a 
    particular employee.

Date and time: Thursday, March 2, 1995 at 10:00 a.m.

Place: 999 E Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. (Ninth Floor.)

Status: This meeting will be closed to the public.

Items to be discussed:

Correction and approval of Minutes.
Advisory Opinion 1994-36: Susan M. Frank on behalf of Science 
    Applications International Corporation (SAIC).
Advisory Opinion 1995-05: Gregory Galassini on behalf of the 14th 
    District TRIM Committee.
Administrative Matters.

Date and time: Thursday, March 2, 1995 at 2:00 p.m.

Place: 999 E Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. (Ninth Floor.)

Status: This oral hearing will be open to the public.

Matter before the commission: Buchanan for President, Inc.--Oral 
Hearing.

Person to contact for information: Mr. Ron Harris, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 219-4155.
Delores Hardy,

Administrative Assistant.

[FR Doc. 95-4635 Filed 2-21-95; 3:25 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
Exhibit 4.2


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


 


We have issued our report
dated January 6, 2023, with respect to the financial statement of Advisors Disciplined Trust 2157 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the
Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-268677) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in
the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Experts”.


 





	 	/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP



 


Chicago, Illinois


January 6, 2023
|Exhibit
23.1



Consent of Ernst &
Young LLP, Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements No. 33-87908, 33-97710, 333-18347, 333-33390,
333-55821 and 333-57580 of our report dated January 30, 2004, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc., included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003.
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Boston, Massachusetts | 
|--------------------- | 
|March 15, 2004        |
VEHICLE PURCHASE
                          AGREEMENT            March 18, 1998
        
KANSAS CITY PETERBILT     OTR Express, Inc.
                          P O Box 2819
                          Olathe,       Ks.    66062
                          (913) 829-1616




BASE PRICE OF UNIT

(50)   378 Peterbilt tractors w/63" H/R Sleepers
  Ultra Cabs and Cat Engines

Prices Include: =  Dual S/S 13" Air Cleaners, Double Bunk in sleeper
      T.V. Shelf, and antenna, F.E.T.
Units to be delivered between July and December, 1998
  $ 78,630.00 per unit w/metallic paint          
  $ 78,488.00 per unit w/out metallic paint                   





Trade Ins: 25 units (Pete, Freightliner, Navistar) to be determined
  at time of trade at $37,000.00

                                     Base Price Plus Options
Used Vehicle Trade-in Information    of Described Vehicle    

Balance Owed to                      Net Trade-In Allowance    
                                     Trade Difference  
Address                              Service Contract
                                     F.E.T.
Used Trade-In Allowance              Sub Total
                                     State and Local Taxes or ICC
Balance Owned On Trade-In            License, License Transfer
                                     Total Price of Vehicle
Net Allowance On Used  trade-In      Partial Payment (Deposit)   
                                     Unpaid Balance Due On Delivery
  This contract is not binding upon the dealer until signed by 
unauthorized representative.  Buyer many cancel this contract and 
receive full refund anytime before receipt of a copy of this contract 
signed by an authorized dealer representative by giving written notice 
of cancellation to the dealer.

  Purchaser agrees that this Order includes all of the terms and 
conditions on both the face and reverse side hereof, that this Order 
cancels and supersedes any prior agreement and as of the date hereof 
comprises the complete and exclusive statement of the terms of the 
agreement relating to the subject matters covered hereby.  Purchaser 
understands that liability insurance coverage which would protect 
him/her under the Kansas Automobile Injury Reparations Act is not 
included in this purchase of the herein described motor vehicle.  
Purchaser has received a copy of this statement.  The seller of this 
vehicle (has) (has not) performed a title search for the motor vehicle 
being sold for purposes of determining the accuracy of the mileage shown 
on the odometer or for any other purpose.  Purchaser acknowledges the 
receipt of this disclosure.

/s/ Marc Hirschmann OTRX V.P. Purchasing 3/18/98    /s/ Leon Geis    
Purchaser's Signature                               Salesperson's Signature
<PAGE>
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-3367

_____________________________

WILLIE GEORGE DIXON, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Gary L. Bergosh, Judge.

August 16, 2018

PER CURIAM.

Willie George Dixon, Jr. raises three issues on appeal. The 

first, regarding the trial court’s failure to conduct a proper 

competency determination, requires reversal—which the State 

concedes. The other two we find to be without merit. The remedy 

is a remand for the trial court to conduct a nunc pro tunc 

competency evaluation; if one cannot be done, Dixon must receive 

a new trial. See Brooks v. State, 180 So. 3d 1094, 1095 (Fla. 1st 

DCA 2015).

MAKAR, WINOKUR, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Justin Foster Karpf, 

Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Steven Edward Woods, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6100

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ELLISON LAKELL COOPER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. 

Terry L. Wooten, Senior District Judge. (4:12-cr-00520-TLW-1)

Submitted: April 14, 2022 Decided: April 19, 2022

Before DIAZ and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ellison Lakell Cooper, Appellant Pro Se. Everett E. McMillian, Assistant United States

Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Florence, South Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Ellison Lakell Cooper appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for 

compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First Step 

Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. We review a district 

court’s denial of a compassionate release motion for abuse of discretion. United States v. 

Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 383 (2021). We have 

reviewed the record in this case and discern no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm 

the district court’s order.*

 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* We decline to consider Cooper’s argument, raised for the first time on appeal, that 

the district court allegedly failed to pronounce all discretionary supervised release terms at 

his original sentencing. See In re Under Seal, 749 F.3d 276, 285 (4th Cir. 2014) (“Our 

settled rule is simple: absent exceptional circumstances, we do not consider issues raised 

for the first time on appeal.” (cleaned up)).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 3, 1996)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 230]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31585]





                Sunshine Act Meetings



Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 2 / Wednesday, January 3, 1996 / 
Sunshine Act Meetings



[[Page 230]]




Commodity Futures Trading Commission

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, January 4, 1996.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C. 9th Fl. Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Enforcement Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Lynn K. Gilbert,

Deputy Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 95-31585 Filed 12-29-95; 2:11 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
NO. 07-04-0381-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TE XAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL B SEPTEMBER 8, 2004

______________________________

DANNY CLEMENT, Appellant
v. THE STA

TE OF TEX

AS, Appellee

_________________________________ FROM THE 7 TH DISTRICT COURT OF SMITH COUNTY; NO. 007-2018-03; HON. KERRY L. RUSSELL, PR ESIDING

_______________________________ ABATEMENT AND RE MAND

_______________________________ Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and CAMPBELL, JJ. Appellant

Danny C lement ap peals fro m a judgment convicting him of possession of
a controlled s ubstance. The reporter’s record is due in this cause. An extension of the applicable deadlin e was sou ght by the court rep orter. Tojustify th e extens ion, the co urt reporter represented that appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay for the record. Nothing of record shows that appellant is i ndigent and entitled to a free record.2

Accordingly, we now a bate this appeal and reman d the cau se to the 7 th District Court of Smith Co unty (tria l court) f or further

proceedi ngs. Upo n remand, the tri al court shal l immediatelycause notice o f a hearin g to be g iven and , thereaft er, condu ct a heari ng to determine

the foll owing: 1. wheth er appel lant des ires to p rosecute the appe al; 2. wheth er appel lant is i ndigent; and, 3. whether the appellant is entitled to appo inted counsel and a free appellate record. The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed. So too shall it 1) execute findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing the foregoing issues, 2) cause to be developed
a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings of fact and conclusions of law and all orders it mayissue as a result of its hearing on this matter, and 3) cause to be developed
a supplemental reporter’s record transcribing the evidence and arguments presented at the aforementioned hearing. Should it be determined that ap pellantwishes to prosec ute the appeal, is indi gent, and is entitled to an appointed attorney but has none, then thetrial co urt shall appoint counsel, unless appellant knowingly and voluntarily wa ives counsel. Furthermore, the name, address, and phone number of any counsel appointed by the trial court to repres ent appe llant sh all be i ncluded in the s upplemen tal recor d. The trial cou rt sha ll also file both supplemental records with the cl erk of this court on or bef ore Octobe r 8, 2004. S hould fu rther t ime be needed by the trial court to perform these tasks, then it must be re quested b efore Octo ber 8, 20 04. It is so ordere d. Per C uriam Do not p ublish.
July 15, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

KEN OKORIE AND LINDA OKORIE, Appellants

NO. 14-14-00189-CV V.

OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, Appellee

________________________________

Today the Court heard appellants’ motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

judgment signed by the court below on January 6, 2014. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellants, Ken Okorie and Linda Okorie.

We further order that mandate be issued immediately.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 75th 

Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

-2.00% -4.34% 0.29% 0.25% -1.72% -4.09%

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable)

Proposed Provision: Apply 4 percent payroll tax rate on earnings over $300,000 in 2017, with the 

$300,000 threshold wage-indexed after 2017. Give proportional benefit credit for additional earnings in 

AIME for benefit computation.

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this provision

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Cost rates with this provision

Income rates under present law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under present law

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Present law With this provision

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2009 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary, Social Security

May 14, 2010

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Cost rates with this provision

Income rates under present law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under present law

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Present law With this provision