Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2016 / Notices 7781 

1PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., et al., 153 FERC 

¶ 61,245 (2015) (November 2015 Order). 

Description: § 205(d) Rate Filing: Rate 

Schedule No. 274—Planning 

Participation Agreement to be effective 

4/9/2016. 

Filed Date: 2/8/16. 

Accession Number: 20160208–5160. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/29/16. 

Docket Numbers: ER16–913–000. 

Applicants: NextEra Energy 

Transmission West, LLC. 

Description: Compliance filing: 

NextEra Energy Transmission West, LLC 

Compliance Filing-2 to be effective 

10/20/2015. 

Filed Date: 2/8/16. 

Accession Number: 20160208–5170. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/29/16. 

Docket Numbers: ER16–914–000. 

Applicants: Axpo U.S. LLC. 

Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: 

Axpo U.S. LLC Application for MarketBased Rate Authorization to be effective 

4/5/2016. 

Filed Date: 2/4/16. 

Accession Number: 20160204–5238. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/25/16. 

The filings are accessible in the 

Commission’s eLibrary system by 

clicking on the links or querying the 

docket number. 

Any person desiring to intervene or 

protest in any of the above proceedings 

must file in accordance with Rules 211 

and 214 of the Commission’s 

Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 

385.214) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern 

time on the specified comment date. 

Protests may be considered, but 

intervention is necessary to become a 

party to the proceeding. 

eFiling is encouraged. More detailed 

information relating to filing 

requirements, interventions, protests, 

service, and qualifying facilities filings 

can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/

docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For 

other information, call (866) 208–3676 

(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659. 

Dated: February 9, 2016. 

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., 

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2016–03017 Filed 2–12–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

Notice Establishing Post-Technical 

Conference Comments 

Docket Nos. 

PJM Interconnection, L.L.C .......................................................................................................................................................... ER15–2562–000 

ER15–2563–000. 

Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. v. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C ...................................................................... EL15–18–001. 

Linden VFT, LLC v. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C ......................................................................................................................... EL15–67–000. 

Delaware Public Service Commission and Maryland Public Service Commission v. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C .................... EL15–95–000. 

PJM Interconnection, L.L.C .......................................................................................................................................................... ER14–972–003. 

PJM Interconnection, L.L.C .......................................................................................................................................................... ER14–1485–005 

Not Consolidated. 

In an order dated November 24, 

2015,1 the Commission found that the 

assignment of cost allocation for the 

projects in the filings and complaints 

listed in the caption using PJM’s 

solution-based distribution factor 

(DFAX) cost allocation method had not 

been shown to be just and reasonable 

and may be unjust, unreasonable, or 

unduly discriminatory or preferential. 

The Commission directed its staff to 

establish a technical conference to 

explore both whether there is a 

definable category of reliability projects 

within PJM for which the solution-based 

DFAX cost allocation method may not 

be just and reasonable, such as projects 

addressing reliability violations that are 

not related to flow on the planned 

transmission facility, and whether an 

alternative just and reasonable ex ante 

cost allocation method could be 

established for any such category of 

projects. 

The technical conference was held on 

January 12, 2016. At the technical 

conference, staff indicated that it would 

establish a schedule for post-technical 

conference comments after reviewing 

the technical conference transcript. A 

revised technical conference transcript 

was placed in the above-referenced 

dockets on February 9, 2016. 

Post-technical conference comments, 

not to exceed 20 pages, are due on or 

before March 1, 2016. 

For more information about this 

technical conference, please contact 

PJMDFAXconfDL@ferc.gov; or Sarah 

McKinley, 202–502–8368, 

sarah.mckinley@ferc.gov, regarding 

logistical issues. 

Dated: February 9, 2016. 

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., 

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2016–03018 Filed 2–12–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[Docket No. RM98–1–000] 

Records Governing Off-the-Record 

Communications; Public Notice 

This constitutes notice, in accordance 

with 18 CFR 385.2201(b), of the receipt 

of prohibited and exempt off-the-record 

communications. 

Order No. 607 (64 FR 51222, 

September 22, 1999) requires 

Commission decisional employees, who 

make or receive a prohibited or exempt 

off-the-record communication relevant 

to the merits of a contested proceeding, 

to deliver to the Secretary of the 

Commission, a copy of the 

communication, if written, or a 

summary of the substance of any oral 

communication. 

Prohibited communications are 

included in a public, non-decisional file 

associated with, but not a part of, the 

decisional record of the proceeding. 

Unless the Commission determines that 

the prohibited communication and any 

responses thereto should become a part 

of the decisional record, the prohibited 

off-the-record communication will not 

be considered by the Commission in 

reaching its decision. Parties to a 

proceeding may seek the opportunity to 

respond to any facts or contentions 

made in a prohibited off-the-record 

communication, and may request that 

the Commission place the prohibited 

communication and responses thereto 

in the decisional record. The 

Commission will grant such a request 

only when it determines that fairness so 

requires. Any person identified below as 

having made a prohibited off-the-record 

communication shall serve the 

document on all parties listed on the 

official service list for the applicable 

proceeding in accordance with Rule 

2010, 18 CFR 385.2010. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES