alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      Exhibit 23



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


To the Shareholders and Board of Directors
Belden & Blake Corporation


     We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated March 5,
1998, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Belden & Blake
Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 1997, in the following Registration Statements and related
Prospectuses.


     REGISTRATION
       NUMBER                      DESCRIPTION OF REGISTRATION STATEMENT
-----------------------    ----------------------------------------------------
     33-62785                 Stock Option Plan; Non-Employee Director Stock
                              Option Plan -- Form S-8


     33-69802                 Employee's 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan -- Form S-8





                                                  ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Cleveland, Ohio
March 23, 1998
Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Washington Banking Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Michal D. Cann, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of,
          and for, the periods presented in the Report.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certification is being furnished
solely to comply with the requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and shall not be
incorporated by reference into any of the Companys filings under the Securities Act
of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise be deemed to be filed as part
of the Report or under such Acts.

/s/ Michal D. Cann

Michal D. CannChief Executive
Officer

May 13, 2005
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION I, Frederick K. Minturn, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MSX
International, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this quarterly report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and we have:  a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
being prepared;b)
    
    (reserved)c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
quarterly report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: August 9, 2004 /s/ Frederick K. Minturn
Frederick K. Minturn
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Gary S. Titus, Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



|(1) | the Amendment to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |                                                                                              
|----------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 2, 2011 |  | /S/    GARY S. TITUS                                                                         
|                  |  | Gary S. Titus Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be
retained by SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 249 (Thursday, December 28, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67141-67142]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31388]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Importation of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Section 1008 of the Controlled Substances Import and 
Export Act (21 U.S.C. 958(i)), the Attorney General shall, prior to 
issuing a registration under this Section to a bulk manufacturer of a 
controlled substance in Schedule I or II and prior to issuing a 
regulation under Section 1002(a) authorizing the importation of such a 
substance, provide manufacturers holding registrations for the bulk 
manufacture of the substance an opportunity for a hearing.
    Therefore, in accordance with Sec. 1311.42 of Title 21, Code of 
Federal Regulations (CFR), notice is hereby given that on October 23, 
1995, North Pacific Trading Company, 1505 SE Gideon Street, Portland, 
Oregon 97202, made application to the Drug Enforcement Administration 
to be registered as an importer of marihuana (7360) a basic class of 
controlled substance in Schedule I.
    This application is exclusively for the importation of marihuana 
seed which will be rendered non-viable and used as bird seed.
    Any manufacturer holding, or applying for, registration as a bulk 
manufacturer of these basic classes of controlled substances may file 
written comments on or objections to the application described above 
and may, at the same time, file a written request for a hearing on such 
application in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.54 in such form as 
prescribed by 21 CFR 1316.47.
    Any such comments, objections, or requests for a hearing may be 
addressed to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion 
Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of 
Justice, Washington, D.C. 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register 
Representative (CCR), and must be filed no later than (30 days from 
publication).
    This procedure is to be conducted simultaneously with and 
independent of the procedures described in 21 CFR 1311.42 (b), (c), 
(d), (e), and (f). As noted in a previous notice at 40 FR 43745-46 
(September 23, 1975), all applicants for registration to import basic 
classes of any controlled substances in Schedule I or II are and will 
continue to be required to demonstrate to the Deputy Assistant 
Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement 
Administration that the requirements for such registration pursuant to 
21 U.S.C. 958(a), 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and 21 CFR 1311.42 (a), (b), (c), 
(d), (e), and (f) are satisfied.


[[Page 67142]]

    Dated: December 15, 1995.
Gene R. Haislip,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 95-31388 Flied 12-27-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
#### IN THE MATTER OF THE MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE, EXECUTED BY CLARENCE JERNIGAN AND WIFE, SALLIE JERNIGAN, TO RUPERT W. JERNIGAN, AND DULY ASSIGNED TO THE BANK OF BEAUFORT.

(Filed 15 April, 1931.)

Mortgages H o — Assignee of mortgagee is entitled to commissions upon repeated resale of lands under foreclosure.

The allowance to be made a mortgagee as his commissions for several times selling the lands under advance bids is governed by the principle announced in *In re 1lollowell Land,*194 N. C., 222, where the lands were foreclosed by a trustee in a deed of trust.

Civil actioN, before *Bamhill, J.,*at October Term, 1930, of DupliN.

On 22 January, 1926, Clarence Jernigan and wife executed and delivered to Rupert *W.*Jernigan a note for $1,500, and as security therefor executed and delivered a mortgage on certain real estate in Duplin County. On the same day the note was duly assigned to the Bank of Beaufort. Thereafter, on 17 March, 1930, the Bank of Beaufort advertised the property and sold it under power contained in the mortgage. The property was resold three or four times, and was finally sold for the price of $2,525. The Bank of Beaufort filed a petition with the clerk “for a just allowance of time, labor, services and expenses to be taxed as costs in the foreclosure of the said mortgage.” The clerk declined to allow any costs except for newspaper advertisement and fee for filing the account of sale. The petitioner appealed to the judge of the Superior Court, who found, as a fact, that the property had been sold five times, and that as a result thereof the mortgagee had incurred “a great deal of extra expense, time, labor and services in making the resales.” Thereupon, it was adjudged that the petitioner be allowed five per cent commissions “on amount of debts in addition to court costs in the cause, to be taxed as a part of the costs of sale of said property,” etc.

*637From the foregoing judgment Sallie Jernigan, administratrix of Clarence Jernigan, mortgagor, appealed.

*Gamin & Johnson for appellant.*

*G. R. Wheatley for petitioner.*

Per Curiam.

The judgment rendered is directly authorized by *In re Hollowell Land,*194 N. C., 222. The fact that the sale was made by a mortgagee rather than a trustee in a deed of trust does not prevent the application of the principle of law declared in *the Hollowell case, supra.*

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

       CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NASB Financial, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2009, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, David H. Hancock, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.


June 4, 2010               By: /s/ David H. Hancock
                               David H. Hancock
                               Chairman and Chief
                                 Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to NASB Financial, Inc. and will be retained by NASB
Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.


This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for
any other purpose.

<Page>
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Da-Lite ScreenCompany, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending January 1, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jerry C. Young, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: February 26, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 16, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 7720]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02950]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION

39 CFR Part 3001

[Docket No. RM2016-6; Order No. 3048]


Procedures Related to Motions; Correction

AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects the DATES section to a proposed rule 
published in the Federal Register of February 1, 2016. The Commission 
did not intend to permit interested persons to file reply comments. The 
Commission is seeking initial comments only.

DATES: Comments are due: March 2, 2016. There will be no reply comment 
period.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at 
202-789-6820.

Correction

    In proposed rule FR Doc. 2016-01735, beginning on page 5085 in the 
issue of February 1, 2016, make the following correction to the Dates 
section. On page 5085 in the first column, revise the DATES to read as 
follows:

DATES: Comments are due: March 2, 2016. There will be no reply comment 
period.

    By the Commission.
Stacy L. Ruble,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-02950 Filed 2-12-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P
#### MARCUS EVAN CAMPBELL v. MARGARET BROWN.

(Filed 11 November, 1959.)

1. Compromise and Settlement—

Judgment sustaining defendant’s plea in bar based on a settlement made by plaintiff’s insurer with defendant without the knowledge or consent of plaintiff, reversed on authority of *Lampley v. Bell,*250 N.C. 713.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Phillips, J.,*April Term, 1959, of RANDOLPH.

Civil action to recover property damages allegedly 'caused by the negligence of defendant, growing out of a collision on July 14, 1958' at a street intersection in Randleman, N. C., between automobiles owned by plaintiff and by defendant. Evan D. Campbell, plaintiff’s minor son, was operating plaintiff’s oar; .and Jerry Brown, defendant’s minor son, was operating defendant’s ear. ’

Plaintiff moved to strike the .allegations of defendant’s. “Second Further Defense” wherein defendant ¡alleged, in bar of plaintiff’s action, the payment to defendant by plaintiff’s liability insurance carrier of $250.00’in full settlement of defendant’s claims ¡against plaintiff, Evan D. Campbell and said insurance carrier, and the-execution by defendant of a release.

There was a hearing with reference to defendant’s said plea in bar in which the parties stipulated, *inter alia,*that the insurance carrier made the settlement and obtained defendant’s release “without the knowledge or consent of the plaintiff.” The court ruled that, .upon the stipulated facts, plaintiff’s action was barred; and judgment', dismissing the action ¡and taxing plaintiff with costs, was entered. Plaintiff excepted and appealed. ■ ■

*Ottway Burton and Don Davis for plaintiff, appellant.*

*Coltrane & Gavin for defendant, appellee.*

Per Curiam.

In *Lampley v. Bell,*250 N.C. 713, 110 S.E. 2d 316, opinion filed September 23,1959, this Court fully considered the identical question; .and, upon authority thereof, the judgment of the court below is reversed. Indeed, by stipulation filed in this Court, the parties agree that *Lampley v. Bell, supra,*controls decision here and requires such reversal.

It is noted that *Lampley v. Bell, supra,*had not been decided when the court entered the judgment (April 13, 1959) from which this appeal is taken.

Reversed.
#### The New York, Lake Erie and Western Railway Company v. George W. Carhart and another.

Judgment modified as directed and affirmed as modified, without costs.

Opinion by

Daniels, J.
**EXHIBIT 24**
**USF CORPORATION**
**POWER OF ATTORNEY**
     The undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints ThomasE. Bergmann and Richard C. Pagano,or each of them, my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution,to execute on my behalf, individually and in all capacities as an officer or director of USFCorporation, an Annual Report on Form 10-K, and all amendments thereto, for the year ended December31, 2004, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and any other documents in connectiontherewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact andagents full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite andnecessary to be done to comply with all requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, asfully and to all intents and purposes as each might or could do in person, and the undersignedhereby ratifies and confirms each act that said attorneys-in-fact and agents may lawfully do orcause to be done by virtue thereof.
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed thispower of attorney on March 11, 2005.   **Signature **Title** /s/ Paul J. LiskaPaul J. Liska Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors/s/ Neil A. SpringerNeil A. Springer Director/s/ Glenn R. RichterGlenn R. Richter Director/s/ Morley KoffmanMorley Koffman Director/s/ Stephen W. LilienthalStephen W. Lilienthal Director/s/ Michael L.ThompsonMichael L. Thompson Director/s/ Anthony J. PaoniAnthony J. Paoni Director**
## Detailed Single Year Tables

- Individual Provisions
- Level of Monthly Benefits

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						B3.13: For retired worker beneficiaries newly eligible in 2030 (excluding disabled workers), add a new bend point at the wage-indexed equivalent of the 50th percentile of the AIME distribution minus $100 (for 2015 eligibility) and change the PIA factors to 95/32/15/5. Also move the current-law first bend point from the wage-indexed equivalent of $1,115 in 2023 to $1,417 in 2023. Phase this provision in over 10 years (2030-2039). The phase-in would work on a weighted-average basis: 90% of CL formula + 10% of proposal formula for 2030, 80% of CL formula + 20% of proposal formula for 2031, and so on.**

### Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program

### Summarized Estimates
EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Forms S-3 (No. 333-106608, No. 333-108924, No. 333-10754, No. 333-110752, No.
333-82496, No. 333-91225, No. 333-91235 and No. 333-17105) and Forms S-8 (No.
333-109595 and No. 33-82410) of SpatiaLight, Inc. of our reports dated March 2,
2005 relating to the consolidated financial statements of SpatiaLight, Inc.,
SpatiaLight, Inc. management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting of SpatiaLight, Inc., included in this Annual Report on Form
10-K/A Amendment No. 3 for the year ended December 31, 2004.

/s/ ODENBERG, ULLAKKO, MURANISHI & CO. LLP

San Francisco, California
May 13, 2005
Exhibit 99.2

# CERTIFICATIONS

I, A. Mark Young, certify that:

|1. |  | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of E Com
          Ventures, Inc.
|-- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | Based on my knowledge, this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report does not
          contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
          necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
          such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periods covered by
          this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report.
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 30, 2003