alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-11186

Summary Calendar

 

JERREL LIGGINS, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

STATE OF TEXAS; RUSS HENRICHS; 

DALLAS POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:96-CV-1918-P

- - - - - - - - - -

April 30, 1997

Before SMITH, DUHE’ and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jerrel Liggins, Jr., Texas inmate #761802, moves for leave

to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal under the Prison

Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA). The PLRA requires a

prisoner appealing IFP in a civil action to pay the full amount

of the filing fee, $105. As Liggins does not have funds for

immediate payment of this fee, he is assessed an initial partial
No. 96-11186

- 2 -

filing fee of $8.29, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). 

Following payment of the initial partial filing fee, funds shall

be deducted from Liggins’ prisoner account until the full filing

fee is paid. See § 1915(b)(2).

IT IS ORDERED that Liggins pay the appropriate initial

filing fee to the Clerk of the District Court for the Northern

District of Texas. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the agency having

custody of Liggins’ inmate account shall collect the remainder of

the $105 filing fee and forward for payment, in accordance with 

§ 1915(b)(2), to the Clerk of the District Court for the Northern

District of Texas each time the amount in Liggins’ account

exceeds $10, until the appellate filing fee is paid.

Liggins challenges the dismissal as frivolous of his civil

rights complaint. He argues that the police falsely arrested him

and that counsel rendered ineffective assistance by having a

conflict of interest with Liggins, namely, Liggins suing counsel

for violation of his civil rights. Liggins’ remaining arguments

were not raised in his objections to the magistrate judge’s

report and thus, are reviewed for plain error. See Douglass v.

United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (5th Cir. 1996)

(en banc). Our review of the record and the arguments reveals no

plain error.

For essentially the same reasons upon which the district

court relied by adopting the magistrate judge’s report, see

Liggins v. State of Texas, No. CA 3-96-CV-1918-P (N.D. Tex. Sept.
No. 96-11186

- 3 -

6, 1996), we conclude that the district court did not abuse its

discretion in dismissing the complaint as frivolous. See Denton

v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 33 (1992). 

The appeal lacks arguable merit and is frivolous. See 5th

Cir. R. 42.2. Therefore, the appeal is DISMISSED.

IFP GRANTED. APPEAL DISMISSED.
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Retirement Age | Description of Proposed Provision:      Shorten the hiatus in the normal retirement age (start increasing to age 67 for those age 62 in 2010, rather than those age 62 in 2017) and then index the normal retirement age (by 1 month every 2 years) until the NRA reaches age 70. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2009 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified November 16, 2009 |
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-59597) of Enbridge
Energy, Limited Partnership and the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-59758, 333-89588 and 333-106660) of Enbridge Energy Partners,
L.P. of our report dated February 25, 2005 relating to the financial statements, management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP

Houston,
Texas
February 25, 2005

---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 5 (Monday, January 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2397-2398]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-327]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Public Health Service
[GN# 2292]


National Vaccine Advisory Committee; Public Meeting

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health.

SUMMARY: The Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) and the 
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health are announcing the 
forthcoming meeting of the National Vaccine Advisory Committee.

DATES: Date, Time and Place: January 19, 1995 at 8:30 a.m.; and January 
20, at 8:30 a.m.; Hubert H. Humphrey Building, room 703A, 200 
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20201. The entire meeting is 
open to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Written requests to participate should be sent to Jeannette R. De 
Lawter, Committee Management Specialist, National Vaccine Advisory 
Committee, National Vaccine Program Office, Rockwall II Building, suite 
1075, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857 (301) 594-2277.

Agenda: Open Public Hearing

    Interested persons may formally present data, information, or views 
orally or in writing on issues pending before the Advisory Committee or 
on any of the duties and responsibilities of the Advisory Committee as 
described below. Those wishing to make presentations should notify the 
contact person before January 13, 1995, and submit a brief statement of 
the information they wish to present to the Advisory Committee. 
Requests should include the names and addresses of proposed 
participants and an indication of the approximate time required to make 
their comments. A maximum of 10 minutes will be allowed for a given 
presentation. Any person attending the meeting who does not request an 
opportunity to speak in advance of the meeting will be allowed to make 
an oral presentation at the conclusion of the meeting, if time permits, 
at the chairperson's discretion.

Open Advisory Committee Discussion

    There will be updates on the National Vaccine Program Office, and 
the National Vaccine Compensation Program. There will be discussions on 
the one working subcommittee: Future Vaccines, and the Interagency 
Working Group on Pandemic Influenza. Meetings of the Advisory Committee 
shall be conducted, insofar as is practical, in accordance with the 
agenda published in the Federal Register notices. Changes 
[[Page 2398]] in the agenda will be announced at the beginning of the 
meeting.
    Persons interested in specific agenda items may ascertain from the 
contact person the approximate time of discussion. A list of Advisory 
Committee members and the charter of the Advisory Committee will be 
available at the meeting. Those unable to attend the meeting may 
request this information from the contact person. Summary minutes of 
the meeting will be made available upon request from the contact 
person.

    Dated: December 27, 1994.
Jeannette R. De Lawter,
Acting Executive Secretary, NVAC.
[FR Doc. 95-327 Filed 1-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-17-M
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 75th 

Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

-2.00% -4.34% 0.30% 0.37% -1.71% -3.97%

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable)

Proposed Provision: Apply 4 percent payroll tax rate on earnings over $400,000 in 2017, with the 

$400,000 threshold wage-indexed after 2017. Give no benefit credit for earnings in AIME for benefit 

computation.

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this provision

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Cost rates with this provision

Income rates under present law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under present law

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Present law With this provision

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2009 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary, Social Security

May 14, 2010

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Cost rates with this provision

Income rates under present law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under present law

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Present law With this provision
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 32 (Thursday, February 16, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9054-9055]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3941]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Public Law 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting 
of the Theater Advisory Panel (Professional Theater Companies Panel A 
Section) to the National Council on the Arts will be held on March 13-
17, 1995, The panel will meet from 9:30 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. on March 13; 
from 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. on March 14-16; and from 9:00 a.m. to 8:00 
p.m. on March 17 in Room 730, at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 
Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20506.
    Portions of this meeting will be open to the public on March 13 
from 9:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. for opening remarks and a discussion of 
procedural issues and review criteria for the Professional Theater 
Companies category and from 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. on March 17 for a 
discussion of guidelines, policy, and procedural issues.
    The remaining portions of this meeting from 10:30 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. 
on March 13; from 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. on March 14-16; and from 9:00 
a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on March 17 are for the purpose of panel review, 
discussion, evaluation, and recommendation on applications for 
financial assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and the 
Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including information given in 
confidence to the agency by grant applicants. In accordance with the 
determination of the Chairman of February 8, 1994, these sessions will 
be closed to the public pursuant to subsection (c)(4), (6) and (9)(B) 
of Section 552b of Title 5, United States Code.
    Any person may observe meetings, or portions thereof, of advisory 
panels which are open to the public, and may be permitted to 
participate in the panel's discussions at the discretion of the Panel 
chairman and with the approval of the full-time Federal employee in 
attendance.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact the [[Page 9055]] Office of Special Constituencies, National 
Endowment for the Arts, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, 
D.C., 20506, 202/682-5532, TTY 202/682-5496, at least seven (7) days 
prior to the meeting.
    Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained 
from Ms. Yvonne M. Sabine, Committee Management Officer, National 
Endowment for the Arts, Washington, D.C., 20506, or call 202/682-5433.

    Dated: February 13, 1995.
Yvonne M. Sabine,
Director Office of Council and Panel Operations, National Endowment for 
the Arts.
[FR Doc. 95-3941 Filed 2-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from PTEK
Holdings, Inc. and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          15,366
<SECURITIES>                                    86,615
<RECEIVABLES>                                   79,073
<ALLOWANCES>                                    11,421
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               182,932
<PP&E>                                         286,181
<DEPRECIATION>                                 167,456
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 770,481
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          148,186
<BONDS>                                        172,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           481
<OTHER-SE>                                     421,739
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   770,481
<SALES>                                        458,448
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               458,448
<CGS>                                          129,691
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  129,691
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               466,838
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,728
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,807
<INCOME-TAX>                                    35,298
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (33,491)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (33,491)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.72)


</TABLE>
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Retirement Age | Description of Proposed Provision:      Shorten the hiatus in the normal retirement age (start increasing to age 67 for those age 62 in 2010, rather than those age 62 in 2017). |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2009 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified November 16, 2009 |
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-72130, 33-58362, 333-3846, 333-35215, 333-40634, 333-50330, 333-75134 and 333-114151 of Genta Incorporated on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 33-85887, 333-94181, 333-94185, 333-101022, 333-118987 and 333-128381 of Genta Incorporated on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 17, 2008, relating to (i) the consolidated financial statements of Genta Incorporated (which report expressed an unqualified opinion and included explanatory paragraphs relating to Genta Incorporateds ability to continue as a going concern and the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (Revised 2004),Share-Based Payment, effective January 1, 2006, and Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes  an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, effective January 1, 2007) and (ii) the effectiveness of Genta Incorporateds internal control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Genta Incorporated for the year ended December 31, 2007.



/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLPParsippany, New JerseyMarch 17, 2008






---
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

FIREWORKS LADY & CO LLC,

Appellant,

v.

DARRYL DAYE,

Appellee.

No. 4D2023-3153

[July 3, 2024]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; John B. Bowman, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE20011064.

Richard W. Ervin, IV, of Bleakley Bavol Denman & Grace, P.A., Tampa, 

for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, LEVINE and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000881757
<NAME>                        ENEX OIL & GAS INCOME PROGRAM V - SERIES 4, L.P.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   dec-31-1996
<CASH>                                         33580
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  106750
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               150531
<PP&E>                                         1451194
<DEPRECIATION>                                 540909
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1068694
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          89341
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     979353
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1068694
<SALES>                                        897673
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               897673
<CGS>                                          747983
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  804113
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               56130
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   93692
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
### Proposed Provision: F9. Apply a separate 12.4 percent tax on investment income as defined in the Affordable Care Act (ACA), with unindexed thresholds as in the ACA ($200,000 single filer, $250,000 for married filing joint), starting in 2025. Proceeds go to the OASDI Trust Funds.
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 99-20181 Summary Calendar

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PEDRO MUNIVE,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

(H-94-CR-300-1)

_________________________________________________________________ January 3, 2000

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Pedro Munive appeals his conviction for conspiracy to possess

with the inten t to distribute and aiding and abetting the

possession with the i ntent to distribute in excess of five

kil ograms of cocaine. His sole contention on appeal is that the

district court erred by denying his challenges for cause to three

prospective jurors who testified during voir dire that they would

tend to believe the testimony of government agents, forcing him to

waste peremptory challenges on those jurors.2

To the extent that Munive contends that the denials of his

challenges fo r cause violated his Sixth Amendment right to an

impartial jury, the claim fails because he does not contend that

any of the jurors who actually served were not impartial. S ee Ross

v. Oklahoma

, 487 U.S. 81, 88 (1988); United States v. Webster

, 162

F.3d 308, 342 n.36 (5th Cir. 1998) (citation omi tted), c ert.

denied

,

___ U.S.
___, 120 S. Ct. 83 (1999). Munive’s claim that he

was denied his statutory right to free exercise of his peremptory

challenges also fails because he has not demonstrated that the

d istrict court abused its discretion in determining that the

challenged jurors were impartial. S ee United States v. Scott
, 159

F.3d 916, 925 (5th Cir. 1998); United States v. Munoz
, 15 F.3d 395,

397 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 511 U.S. 1134 (1994)

.

AFFIRMED