Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 250 / Friday, December 29, 1995 / Rules and Regulations 67325

(b) Upon the accumulation of 8 years or

1,000 hours TIS after installation of each oil

cooler assembly, whichever occurs first, and

thereafter every 8 years or 1,000 hours TIS

(whichever occurs first), accomplish one of

the following:

(1) Replace each oil cooler hose assembly

with a part number specified in the

APPLICABILITY section of this AD, and

reinspect in accordance with paragraph (a) of

this AD at intervals not to exceed 100 hours

TIS; or

(2) Replace each oil cooler hose assembly

with an approved TSO–C53a, Type D, hose

assembly ensuring that there is a minimum

of 2 inches between the oil cooler hoses and

exhaust stacks (as applicable) upon

installation. Ensure that there is a minimum

bend radius of 6.5 inches on oil cooler

assemblies incorporating 0.75-inch outer

diameter hoses.

(c) The replacement specified in paragraph

(b)(2) of this AD may be accomplished at any

time prior to the 8-year or 1,000-hour

compliance time as terminating action for the

100-hour TIS repetitive inspection

requirement of this AD.

(d) After adjusting or installing oil cooler

hoses, prior to further flight, run the engine

for 5 minutes to ensure that there are no oil

leaks and that the 2-inch clearance is

maintained (as applicable) when the engine

is warm. Prior to further flight, replace any

leaking oil cooler hoses and adjust the

clearance accordingly.

Note 3: Although not required by this AD,

the FAA recommends that an oil cooler hose

flexibility test be accomplished at each 100-

hour TIS inspection interval. Oil cooler hose

flexibility may be determined by gently

lifting the hose in several places from the

bottom of its downward arc to the oil cooler.

If the oil cooler hose moves slightly either

from side-to-side or upward with the hand at

the center of an even arc, then some

flexibility remains. If the oil cooler hose

appears hardened or inflexible, replacement

is recommended.

(e) Special flight permits may be issued in

accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199

of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR

21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to

a location where the requirements of this AD

can be accomplished.

(f) An alternative method of compliance or

adjustment of the initial or repetitive

compliance times that provides an equivalent

level of safety may be approved by the

Manager, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office

(ACO), Campus Building, 1701 Columbia

Avenue, suite 2–160, College Park, Georgia

30337–2748. The request shall be forwarded

through an appropriate FAA Maintenance

Inspector, who may add comments and then

send it to the Manager, Atlanta ACO.

Note 4: Information concerning the

existence of approved alternative methods of

compliance with this AD, if any, may be

obtained from the Atlanta ACO.

Note 5: Alternative methods of compliance

approved in accordance with AD 76–25–06

(superseded by this action) are not

considered approved as alternative methods

of compliance with this AD.

(g) Figure 1 of this AD may be obtained

from the Atlanta ACO at the address

specified in paragraph (f) of this AD. This

document or any other information that

relates to this AD may be inspected at the

FAA, Central Region, Office of the Assistant

Chief Counsel, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th

Street, Kansas City, Missouri.

(h) This amendment (39–9472) supersedes

AD 76–25–06, Amendment 39–2788.

(i) This amendment (39–9472) becomes

effective on February 5, 1996.

Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on

December 19, 1995.

Dwight A. Young,

Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,

Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 95–31351 Filed 12–28–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–U

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

16 CFR Parts 1, 2, 3, and 4

Rules of Practice Amendments;

Correction

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Correction to final regulations.

SUMMARY: This document contains a

correction to the final regulations,

which were published Friday, July 21,

1995 (60 FR 37746).

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 21, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Donald S. Clark, Secretary, Federal

Trade Commission, Washington, DC

20580, 202–326–2514.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

The Federal Trade Commission

amended its Rules of Practice to adapt

them to the Federal Trade Commission

Act Amendments of 1994. This action

conformed the Commission’s Rules of

Practice to certain statutory changes and

provided guidance to the public.

Need for Correction

A correction to the final regulations

published on July 21, 1995 is needed in

order to ensure that the Code of Federal

Regulations correctly sets forth the

amended version of Section 4.7(f) of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice.

Correction of Publication

Therefore, the final rule published on

July 21, 1995 (60 FR 37746) is corrected

as follows:

On page 37748, third column, the first

sentence of paragraph (f) in section 4.7

is corrected to read as follows:

§ 4.7 Ex parte communications.

* * * * *

(f) The prohibitions of paragraph (b)

of this section do not apply to a

communication occasioned by and

concerning a nonadjudicative function

of the Commission, including such

functions as the initiation, conduct, or

disposition of a separate investigation,

the issuance of a complaint, or the

initiation of a rulemaking or other

proceeding, whether or not it involves a

party already in an adjudicative

proceeding; preparations for judicial

review of a Commission order; a

proceeding outside the scope of § 3.2,

including a matter in state or federal

court or before another governmental

agency; a nonadjudicative function of

the Commission, including but not

limited to an obligation under § 4.11 or

a communication with Congress; or the

disposition of a consent settlement

under § 3.25 concerning some or all of

the charges involved in a complaint and

executed by some or all respondents.

Donald S. Clark,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–31489 Filed 12–28–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6750–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND

URBAN DEVELOPMENT

Office of the General Counsel,

Requirements Governing the Lobbying

of HUD Personnel; Repeal of Section

13 of the Department of Housing and

Urban Development Act

24 CFR Part 86

[Docket No. FR–4006–N–01]

AGENCY: Office of the General Counsel,

HUD.

ACTION: Notification of status of

regulations following repeal of statutory

authority.

SUMMARY: This document advises the

public that the Lobbying Disclosure Act

of 1995 repealed section 13 of the

Department of Housing and Urban

Development Act. Section 13

established recordkeeping, reporting,

and registration requirements governing

attempts to influence HUD programs. It

also placed limitations on the fees paid

to consultants who are engaged to

influence the award or allocation of the

Department’s financial assistance.

Beginning on January 1, 1996, the

public is no longer required to comply

with section 13 and the HUD

regulations in 24 CFR part 86 which

implement section 13. Among other

things, the public need not submit the

annual reports due by January 10, 1996

under sections 13 (b)(1) and (c)(1). The

public should be aware, however, that

the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995

may impose new requirements on those