Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 41 / Thursday, March 2, 1995 / Notices 11661

Edison) tendered for filing pursuant to

Section 203 of the Federal Power Act,

16 U.S.C. § 824(b), and Part 33 of the

Commission’s Regulations under the

Federal Power Act, 18 CFR Part 33, an

Application for Authority to Establish a

Parent Holding Company.

Detroit Edison states that a copy of its

application has been served upon the

Michigan Public Service Commission.

Comment date: March 16, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

2. Central Vermont Public Service

Corporation and Green Mountain

Power Corporation

[Docket No. ER95–571–000]

Take notice that on February 8, 1995,

Central Vermont Public Service

Corporation (‘‘Central Vermont’’) and

Green Mountain Power Corporation

(together the ‘‘Parties’’) tendered for

filing a Transformer Joint Ownership

Agreement.

The Parties request the Commission to

waive its notice of filing requirement to

permit the Agreement to become

effective on the in-service date of the

transformer. In support of its requests,

the Parties state that allowing the

Agreement to become effective as

provided will enable the Parties and

their customers to achieve mutual

benefits. Additionally, Central Vermont

requests that the Commission

acknowledge that Central Vermont is

not precluded from providing its

customers with up to 50% of the

transformer’s MVA related capacity as a

result of its 50% ownership in the

transformer.

Comment date: March 9, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

3. Kamine/Besicorp Allegany L.P.

[Docket Nos. QF88–292–003 and EL95–29–

000]

Take notice that on February 17, 1995,

Kamine/Besicorp Allegany L.P.,

(Kamine/Besicorp) tendered for filing a

Petition For Temporary Waiver of the

Commission’s Regulations under the

Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of

1978 (PURPA). Kamine/Besicorp

requests the Commission to temporarily

waive the operating and efficiency

standards for qualifying cogenerating

facilities as set forth in Section 292.205,

18 CFR 292.205 of the Commission’s

Regulations implementing Section 201

of PURPA, as amended, with respect to

its cogeneration facility located in

Hume, New York. Specifically, Kamine/

Besicorp requests waiver of the

operating and efficiency standards for

the period of October 14, 1994, through

December 31, 1994.

Comment date: Thirty days after

publication of this notice in the Federal

Register, in accordance with Standard

Paragraph E at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, N.E.,

Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance

with Rules 211 and 214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR

385.214). All such motions or protests

should be filed on or before the

comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–5153 Filed 3–1–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Docket No. ER94–998–001 et al.]

Ocean State Power & Ocean State

Power II, et al.; Electric Rate and

Corporate Regulation Filings

February 22, 1995.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Ocean State Power Ocean State

Power II.

[Docket Nos. ER94–998–001 and ER94–999–

001]

Take notice that on February 9, 1995,

Ocean State Power and Ocean State

Power II tendered for filing its

compliance filing in the abovereferenced dockets.

Comment date: March 8, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

2. South Carolina Gas & Electric Co.

[Docket No. ER95–64–001]

Take notice that on February 6, 1995,

South Carolina Gas & Electric Company

(SCG&E) tendered a compliance filing in

the referenced docket in accordance

with the Commission’s January 6, 1995

Order in such docket. SCG&E states that

the compliance filing has been served

on all parties to the proceeding.

Comment date: March 8, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

3. Gulf Power Co.

[Docket No. ER95–351–000]

Take notice that on February 6, 1995,

Gulf Power Company tendered for filing

a modification to its amendment to the

Transmission Service Agreement

between Gulf Power Company and Bay

Resource Management, Inc. The purpose

of this modification is to allow for the

in kind payment of allowance costs

prior to the EPA reporting date rather

than at the time of the transaction.

Comment date: March 8, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

4. Rig Gas Inc.

[Docket No. ER95–480–000]

Take notice that on February 8, 1995,

Rig Gas Inc. tendered for filing an

amendment in the above-referenced

docket.

Comment date: March 8, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

5. Southern California Edison Co.

[Docket No. ER95–511–000]

Take notice that on January 27, 1995,

Southern California Edison Company

tendered for filing a letter informing the

Commission that effective February 28,

1995, the Supplemental Agreements to

the 1990 Integrated Operations

Agreements with the Cities of Azusa,

Banning, and Colton, California will be

terminated.

Comment date: March 8, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

6. Allegheny Power Service

Corporation on behalf of Monongahela

Power Co. The Potomac Edison

Company and West Penn Power

Company (‘‘the APS Companies’’)

[Docket No. ER95–570–000]

Take notice that on February 6, 1995,

Allegheny Power Service Corporation

on behalf of Monongahela Power

Company, The Potomac Edison

Company and West Penn Power

Company (the APS Companies) filed a

Supplement No. 1 to add two (2)

customers to the Standard Generation

Service Rate Schedule under which the

APS Companies offer standard

generation and emergency service to

these customers on an hourly, daily,

weekly, monthly or yearly basis.

Copies of the filing have been

provided to the Public Utilities

Commission of Ohio, the Pennsylvania

Public Utility Commission, the

Maryland Public Service Commission,

and all parties of record.
11662 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 41 / Thursday, March 2, 1995 / Notices

1Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation’s

applications in Docket Nos. CP95–61–000 and

CP95–62–000 were filed with the Commission

under Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act and Part 157

of the Commission’s regulations.

Comment date: March 8, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

7. Central Maine Power Co.

[Docket No. ER95–572–000]

Take notice that on February 8, 1995,

Central Maine Power Company (CMP),

tendered for filing an Amendment to

Central Maine Power Company Rate

Schedule FERC No. 91 between CMP

and Maine Public Service Company

(MPS), entered into as of December 16,

1995 (Amendment). The Amendment

amends the Agreement to increase the

rate for transmission service and to

update certain terms and conditions

applicable to such service.

Comment date: March 8, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

8. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.

[Docket No. ER95–574–000]

Take notice that on February 9, 1995,

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation

(Niagara), tendered for filing with the

Commission an Interconnection and

Transmission Services Agreement

(Agreement) between Niagara and the

City of Salamanca Board of Public

Utilities required to increase the

capability of the delivery point between

Niagara and Salamanca. Niagara

Mohawk requests that the Agreement

become effective sixty days from the

date of filing.

Comment date: March 8, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

9. Kentucky Utilities Co.

[Docket No. ES95–7–002]

Take notice that on February 21, 1995,

Kentucky Utilities Company (Kentucky)

filed an amendment to its application in

Docket Nos. ES95–7–000 and ES95–7–

001 under § 204 of the Federal Power

Act. By letter order November 23, 1994,

Kentucky was authorized to issue not

more than $100 million of unsecured

promissory notes and commercial paper

from December 1, 1994 through

November 30, 1996, with a final

maturity date no later than December

31, 1996. Kentucky requests that the

authorization issued in Docket Nos.

ES95–7–000 and ES95–7–001 be

amended to increase the authorization

amount from $100 million to $150

million.

Comment date: March 20, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, NE.,

Washington, DC 20426, in accordance

with Rules 211 and 214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR

385.214). All such motions or protests

should be filed on or before the

comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–5154 Filed 3–1–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Docket Nos. CP95–61–000 and CP95–62–

000]

Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.;

Notice of Intent To Prepare an

Environmental Assessment for the

Proposed Majorsville/Crawford

Storage Project and Request for

Comments on Environmental Issues

February 24, 1995.

The staff of the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission (FERC or the

Commission) will prepare an

environmental assessment (EA) that will

discuss the environmental impacts of

the construction and operation of

facilities proposed in the Majorsville/

Crawford Storage Project.1 This EA will

be used by the Commission in its

decision-making process to determine if

an environmental impact statement is

necessary and whether to approve the

project.

Summary of the Proposed Project

In Docket No. CP95–61–000,

Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation

(Columbia) requests Commission

authorization to temporarily deactivate

the storage operations at its MajorsvilleHeard Storage Complex to allow coal

mining operations by the Consol

Pennsylvania Coal Company and/or its

affiliates. Columbia needs to deactivate

its storage facilities when the coal

mining operation is nearby since ‘‘long

wall mining’’ typically causes surface

subsidence which could result in

adverse impact on the wells and

pipelines. Once mining has ended,

Columbia would determine if the

facility can be reactivated or should be

permanently abandoned.

At the Majorsville/Heard Storage

Complex in Greene and Washington

Counties, Pennsylvania and Marshall

County, West Virginia, Columbia

proposes to temporarily deactivate

portions of the storage field for at least

the next 13 years. This would include:

• Abandoning up to 238 wells; and

• Abandoning up to 60 miles of

existing pipeline.

In Docket No. CP95–62–000,

Columbia requests Commission

authorization to increase its natural gas

storage capability and to construct and

operate additional facilities at its

Crawford Storage Field and Crawford

Compressor Station to offset the

temporary deactivation of the

Majorsville-Heard Storage Complex.

Columbia proposes to increase:

• The storage capability of the

Crawford Storage Field by 5 billion

cubic feet (Bcf) to 52 Bcf;

• The annual withdrawals by 8.15 Bcf

to 17.65 Bcf; and

• The design day deliverability by

67.2 million cubic feet per day (MMcfd)

to 232.2 MMcfd.

At the Crawford Storage Field in

Hocking County, Ohio, Columbia

proposes to:

• Drill four new wells;

• Construct about 5.01 miles of

pipeline, including:

—2.30 miles of 20-inch-diameter

pipeline replacing 1.40 mile of 16-

inch-diameter pipeline and 0.90 mile

of 10- and 8-inch-diameter pipeline;

—0.80 mile of 10-inch-diameter

pipeline replacing 0.80 mile of 4-inchdiameter pipeline;

—0.76 mile of 10-inch-diameter new

pipeline;

—0.36 mile of 8-inch-diameter pipeline

replacing 0.40 mile of 4-inch-diameter

pipeline;

—0.45 mile of 8-inch-diameter new

pipeline;

—0.32 mile of 6-inch-diameter pipeline

replacing 0.30 mile of 4-inch-diameter

pipeline; and

—0.02 mile of 6-inch-diameter new

pipeline.

• Install other appurtenant facilities,

including:

—Wellhead measurement stations at

four new and two existing wells;

—Electric measurement cables within

the right-of-way to the four new wells;

—Up to 10 pig launching/receiving

facilities; and

—Valve replacement sets at six existing

and one new well.