alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

AAREN W. STRIPLIN,

Plaintiff,

v. Civil Action No. 24-1651 (JEB)

KAMALA D. HARRIS, et al.,

Defendants.

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pro se Plaintiff Aaren W. Striplin filed a Complaint that named dozens of Defendants as 

“serial killers,” ranging from Vice President Kamala Harris and the Metropolitan Police 

Department to Chuck Norris and Barron Trump. See ECF No. 2 (Compl.) at 2, 4, 7–8. As best 

the Court can discern, Plaintiff alleges that he is the victim of “identity theft,” and that 

Defendants are “resisting [his] arrest to steal [his] church, school, bank, hospital, store.” Id. at 1. 

Plaintiff also accuses Defendants of violating the “Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organized 

Crime Act,” committing a Ponzi Scheme, pyramid scheme, 23 homicides, and 169 counts of 

court extortion, amidst a torrent of other indecipherable allegations. Id. at 4. He supports these 

assertions with unelaborated references to “YouTube.com.” Id. at 7. 

“Over the years this Court has repeatedly held that the federal courts are without power to 

entertain claims otherwise within their jurisdiction if they are so attenuated and unsubstantial as 

to be absolutely devoid of merit, wholly insubstantial, obviously frivolous, plainly unsubstantial, 

or no longer open to discussion.” Hagans v. Lavine, 415 U.S. 528, 536-37 (1974) (cleaned up); 

see also Best v. Kelly, 39 F.3d 328, 330-31 (D.C. Cir. 1994) (may dismiss claims that are 

“essentially fictitious” – for example, where they suggest “bizarre conspiracy theories . . . [or]
2

fantastic government manipulations of their will or mind”) (cleaned up). This is precisely what 

the Complaint alleges here. 

The Court is mindful that complaints filed by pro se litigants are held to “less stringent 

standards” than those applied to “formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.” Haines v. Kerner, 404 

U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Having reviewed Plaintiff’s Complaint, the Court concludes that the 

factual contentions that are identifiable are baseless and wholly incredible. For this reason, the 

Complaint is frivolous and must be dismissed.

The Court, accordingly, will issue a contemporaneous Order dismissing the case without 

prejudice. 

 /s/ James E. Boasberg 

 JAMES E. BOASBERG

 Chief Judge

Date: June 20, 2024
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3895 

AN ACT 

To extend and authorize annual appropriations for the 

United States Commission on International Religious 

Freedom through fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 3895 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘United States Commis3 sion on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization 

4 Act of 2022’’. 

5 SEC. 2. UNITED STATES COMMISSION ON INTERNATIONAL 

6 RELIGIOUS FREEDOM. 

7 (a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 

8 207(a) of the International Religious Freedom Act of 

9 1998 (22 U.S.C. 6435(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘2019 

10 through 2022’’ and inserting ‘‘2023 and 2024’’. 

11 (b) EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION.—Section 209 of 

12 the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 (22 

13 U.S.C. 6436) is amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 

14 2022’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2024’’. 

Passed the Senate July 20, 2022. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3895 

AN ACT 

To extend and authorize annual appropriations for 

Religious Freedom through fiscal year 2024. the United States Commission on International
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 22, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9858]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4301]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION

[Docket No. AB-380 (1X)]


Huron and Eastern Railway Company, Inc.--Abandonment Exemption--
in Huron County, MI

AGENCY: Interstate Commerce Commission.

ACTION: Notice of exemption.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission exempts from the prior approval requirements of 
49 U.S.C. 10903-04 the Huron and Eastern Railway Company, Inc.'s 
abandonment of a 9.81-mile segment of rail line, from milepost 8.69 
near Ruth, to milepost 18.5, at Harbor Beach, in Huron County, MI.

DATES: The exemption will be effective on March 24, 1995, unless a 
formal expression of intent to file an offer of financial assistance is 
filed. Formal expressions of intent to file an offer of financial 
assistance under 49 CFR 1152.27(c)(2)<SUP>1 must be filed by March 6, 
1995; petitions to stay must be filed by March 9, 1995; requests for 
public use condition must be filed by March 14, 1995; and petitions to 
reopen must be filed by March 20, 1995.

    \1\See Exempt. of Rail Abandonment--Offers of Finan, Assist., 4 
I.C.C.2d 167 (1987).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

ADDRESSES: Send pleadings referring to Docket No. AB-380 (Sub-No. 1X) 
to: (1) Office of the Secretary, Case Control Branch, Interstate 
Commerce Commission, 1201 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20423; 
and (2) Petitioner's representative: Robert A. Wimbish, 1920 N Street, 
NW., Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph H. Dettmar, (202) 927-5660. 
[TDD for the hearing impaired: (202) 927-5721.]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Commission's decision. To purchase a copy of the full decision, write 
to, call, or pick up in person from: Dynamic Concepts, Inc., Room 2229, 
Interstate Commerce Commission Building, 1201 Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20423. Telephone: (202) 289-4357/4359. [Assistance for 
the hearing impaired is available through TDD service (202) 927-5712.]

    Decided: February 7, 1995.

    By the Commission, Chairman McDonald, Vice Chairman Morgan, 
Commissioners Simmons and Owen.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-4301 Filed 2-21-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7035-01-P
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 27,

20 12

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________
NO. 14

- 11

- 01009

- CV

____________ ETC NGL TRANSPORT, LLC , Appellant

V.

OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION, OCCIDENTAL ENERGY VENTURES CORPORATION, DCP MIDSTREAM, LP , and DCP SAND HILLS PIPELINE, LLC , Appellee s

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 998360



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an interlocutory appeal from two orders granting temporary injunctions signed November 15

, 20 11 . On March 9

, 20 12

, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal because the case has been settled. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1.

The motion is granted. Accordin gly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Seymore and Brown.
**Exhibit32.02**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theGoRemote Internet Communications, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for thequarterly period ended July 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel W. Fairfax, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge based on a review of the Report:(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periodcovered by the Report.

 

 
| Date:  September 9, 2005 | By:    | /s/ DANIEL W. FAIRFAX                                |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                               |   | Daniel W. Fairfax                                    |
|                               |   | Senior Vice President  & Chief Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to GoRemoteand will be retained by GoRemote and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### Abel A. Crosby and others, Respondents, v. The President, etc., of The Delaware and Hudson Canal Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order reversed, new trial granted, costs to abide the event.

Opinion by

Learned, P. J.;

Landon, J , dissents in opinion.
EXHIBIT 32.1

       CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NASB Financial, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, David H. Hancock, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.


February 9, 2007           By: /s/ David H. Hancock
                               David H. Hancock
                               Chairman and Chief
                                 Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to NASB Financial, Inc. and will be retained by NASB
Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.


This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein , and not for
any other purpose.

<Page>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 28 (Friday, February 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 8136]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3310]




[[Page 8135]]

_______________________________________________________________________

Part VIII





Department of the Interior





_______________________________________________________________________



Bureau of Indian Affairs



_______________________________________________________________________



Grand River Band Ottawa Council; Receipt for Federal Acknowledgment of 
Existence as an Indian Tribe; Notice

Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 28 / Friday, February 10, 1995 / 
Notices
=======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------- 
[[Page 8136]] 


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Grand River Band Ottawa Council; Receipt of Petition for Federal 
Acknowledgment of Existence as an Indian Tribe

    This is published in the exercise of authority delegated by the 
Secretary of the Interior to the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs by 
209 DM 8.
    Pursuant to 25 CFR 83.8(a)(formerly 25 CFR 54.8(a)) notice is 
hereby given that the Grand River Band Ottawa Council, 1391 Terrace 
Street, Muskegon, Michigan 49442, has filed a petition for 
acknowledgment by the Secretary of the Interior that the group exists 
as an Indian tribe. The petition was received by the Bureau of Indian 
Affairs (BIA) on October 16, 1994, and was signed by members of the 
group's governing body.
    This is a notice of receipt of petition and does not constitute 
notice that the petition is under active consideration. Notice of 
active consideration will be sent by mail to the petitioner and other 
interested parties at the appropriate time.
    Under Section 83.8(d)(formerly 54.8(d)) of the Federal regulations, 
interested parties may submit factual and/or legal arguments in support 
of or in opposition to the group's petition. Any information submitted 
will be made available on the same basis as other information in the 
BIA's files. Such submissions will be provided to the petitioner upon 
receipt by the BIA. The petitioner will be provided an opportunity to 
respond to such submissions prior to a final determination regarding 
the petitioner's status.
    The petition may be examined, by appointment, in the Department of 
the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Branch of Acknowledgment and 
Research, Room 1362-MIB, 1849 C Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20240, 
Phone: (202) 208-3592.

    Dated: January 24, 1995.
Ada E. Deer,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 95-3310 Filed 2-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three and nine months ended June 30,
2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a)-14(b) or 15(d)-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the
periods indicated.
  By:
    /s/ KATHLEEN M. CRUSCOKathleen M. CruscoChief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<CIK>         0001059137
<NAME>         SIERRA HOLDINGS GROUP, INC.

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                              1509
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    1509
<PP&E>                                                 0
<DEPRECIATION>                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      1509
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              25723
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           10077
<OTHER-SE>                                        (34291)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        1509
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       0
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   21680
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (21680)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (21680)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (21680)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.00)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.3


 


ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENT


AND REAFFIRMATION OF GUARANTY


 


 Section 1. This
is an acknowledgement and reaffirmation made in connection with that certain Guaranty dated July 11, 2022 (the “Guaranty”),
which evidenced ZONED PROPERTIES, INC., a Nevada corporation (“Guarantor”), guarantying certain obligations of Borrower
to Bank. Guarantor hereby acknowledges and confirms that it has reviewed and approved the terms and conditions of the (i) Amended and
Restated Promissory Note dated as of approximately even date herewith (the “Amended Note”), and (ii) First Amendment
to Loan Agreement (“Amendment to Loan Agreement” and collectively with the Amended Note, the “Amendment”)
between EAST WEST BANK, a California corporation (“Bank”) and ZONED ARIZONA PROPERTIES, LLC, an Arizona limited liability
company (“Borrower”). Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings accorded to them in the
Amendment.


 


 Section 2. Guarantor
represents and warrants that, after giving effect to the Amendment, all representations and warranties contained in the Guaranty are true,
accurate and complete as if made the date hereof. Guarantor hereby consents to the Amendment and agrees that its Guaranty continues in
full force and effect, and is valid and enforceable in accordance with its terms and this Acknowledgement. Guarantor further reaffirms
and agrees that its guaranty obligations extend, among other things, to the obligations under the Amended Note.


 


Dated as of December 07, 2022


 


Guarantor: 


 


ZONED PROPERTIES, INC.,

a Nevada corporation


 


	By:	/s/ Bryan McLaren	 
	Name: 	Bryan McLaren	 
	Title:	Chief Executive Office
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 15

- 00198

- CV

IN RE David B.T. MYRICK Jr.

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Jason Pulliam, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 3, 2015

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On April 2, 2015

, relator David B.T. Myrick Jr. filed a petition for writ of mandamus

complaining of the trial court’s order granting a motion to transfer venue in the underlying civil

action

. The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus , the response filed on

behalf of the real party in interest and relator’s r eply and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled

to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

.

52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 14847B, styled Janice Moody v. Linda Moody, Elizabeth Moody, W.L. Moody V, Edna M. Archer, David B.T. Myrick, Kathryn K. Pacheco, and Haden M. Beardsley , pending in the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas, the Honorable M. Rex Emerson, presiding.
#### CLYDE M. SCOTT v. JOE C. SCOTT.

(Filed 12 October, 1955.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *Patton, Special Judge,*16 May, 1955, Extra Civil Term of MeciclenbuRG.

Civil action under G.S. 50-16 for alimony without divorce:

The issues of fact, submitted to and answered by the jury, were as follows:

“1. Were the plaintiff and defendant married to each other as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: Yes.

*“2.*Did the defendant wrongfully separate himself from the plaintiff and fail to provide her with necessary subsistence according to his means and condition in life? Answer: No.”

Judgment for defendant was entered on the verdict. Plaintiff excepted and appealed, assigning errors.

*B. Kermit Caldwell for plaintiff, appellant.*

*J. M. Scarborough for defendant, appellee.*

Per Curiam.

The jury, on conflicting evidence, resolved the contested (second) issue in defendant’s favor; and there was ample evi*734dence to support this verdict. After careful consideration of plaintiff’s assignments of error, we find no error of law deemed of sufficient prejudicial effect to warrant a new trial. Hence, the verdict and judgment will not be disturbed.

No error.

WiNBORNE and Higgins, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #14614 and # 14615]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of Florida dated 02/05/2016. *Incident:*
                         Tornado *Incident Period:*
                         01/09/2016. *Effective Date:*
                         02/05/2016. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         04/05/2016. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         11/07/2016.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Lee. *Contiguous Counties:* *Florida:*
                     Charlotte, Collier, Glades, Hendry. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
3.625Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.813Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
6.000Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 14614 C and for economic injury is 14615 0. The State which received an EIDL Declaration # is Florida. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Dated: February 5, 2016. Maria Contreras-Sweet, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2016-02874 Filed 2-11-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P