alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 40 (Wednesday, March 1, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 11068]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4884]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration


Designation for the Indianapolis (IN) Area

AGENCY: Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration 
(GIPSA), USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: GIPSA announces the designation of Indianapolis Grain 
Inspection and Weighing Service, Inc. (Indianapolis), to provide 
official services under the United States Grain Standards Act, as 
amended (Act).

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 1, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Janet M. Hart, Chief, Review Branch, Compliance Division, 
GIPSA, USDA, Room 1647 South Building, P.O. Box 96454, Washington, DC 
20090-6454.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janet M Hart, telephone 202-720-8525

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    This action has been reviewed and determined not to be a rule or 
regulation as defined in Executive Order 12866 and Departmental 
Regulation 1512-1; therefore, the Executive Order and Departmental 
Regulation do not apply to this action.
    In the October 3, 1994, Federal Register (59 FR 45258), GIPSA asked 
persons interested in providing official services in the geographic 
area assigned to Indianapolis to submit an application for designation. 
Applications were due by November 1, 1994. Indianapolis, the only 
applicant, applied for designation in the entire area they are 
currently assigned.
    GIPSA requested comments on the applicant in the December 2, 1994 
Federal Register (59 FR 54427). Comments were due by December 30, 1994. 
GIPSA received no comments by the deadline.
    GIPSA evaluated all available information regarding the designation 
criteria in Section 7(f)(l)(A) of the Act; and according to Section 
7(f)(l)(B), determined that Indianapolis is able to provide official 
services in the geographic area for which they applied. Effective April 
1, 1995, and ending March 31, 1998, Indianapolis is designated to 
provide official inspection services in the geographic area specified 
in the October 3, 1994, Federal Register.
    Interested persons may obtain official services by contacting 
Indianapolis at 317-782-8938.

    Authority: Pub. L. 94-582, 90 Stat. 2867, as amended (7 U.S.C. 
71 et seq.)

    Dated: February 15, 1995
Neil E. Porter
Director, Compliance Division
[FR Doc. 95-4884 Filed 2-28-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-EN-F
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 15, 2010

s0908 

# Order

September 15, 2010

140685

CAROL DRAKE and CLELLEN BURY, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 140685 COA: 287502 Berrien CC: 2008-000247-CE CITY OF BENTON HA RBOR and HARBOR SHORES COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 21, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consider ed. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the applicati on or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(H)(1). At oral argument, the parties shall address whether the City of Benton Harbor may lease a portion of Jean Kl ock Park to Harbor Shores Community Redevelopment Corporation to develop 3 holes of a proposed 18-hole championship Jack Nicklaus golf course, without violating: (1) the restriction set forth in the 1917 deed; or (2) the January 27, 2004 consent judgment in an earlier lawsu it between the plaintiffs and the City relating to the City’s sale of a po rtion of Jean Klock Pa rk to Grand Boulevard Renaissance, LLC, for the c onstruction of a residential de velopment. The parties may file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order, but they should not
submit mere restatements of their application papers.

The Michigan Municipal League and the Michigan Recreation and Park
Association are invited to file briefs amicus cu riae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move th e Court for permission
to file briefs amicus curiae.
#### Jose Diaz, Appellant, v Victor Nunez et al., Respondents.

[774 NYS2d 500]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered February 13, 2003, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied and the complaint reinstated.

In moving for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff did not suffer a “serious injury” within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), defendants submitted the affirmed report of only one medical expert, a radiologist. The sole basis for the expert’s report was her review of x-rays created at an unknown location on June 18, 2000, a date four months prior to the subject automobile accident. The expert’s report does not set forth the basis, if any, for her understanding that the x-rays she examined depicted plaintiff, nor is there any other evidence in the record to indicate that any x-rays of plaintiff were made in June 2000. Since defendants’ motion papers thus failed to meet *303their burden to establish a prima facie case that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury, the motion for summary judgment should have been denied regardless of the sufficiency of plaintiffs opposing papers (see *e.g. Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Ellerin and Friedman, JJ.
#### STATE v. ERNEST HARRELL.

(Filed 20 November, 1946.)

1. Criminal Law § 80b (4) —

Where an appeal in a criminal case is not docketed within the time allowed, Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court Nos. 5 and 28, the motion of the Attorney-General to dismiss under Rules 17 and 28 will be allowed.

*7442. Criminal law § 71—

The affidavit for appeal *in forma pauperis*must be made during tie trial term or witbin ten days after tlie adjournment thereof, G. S., 15-182, in order for the Supreme Court to acquire jurisdiction of the appeal, but in a capital case, the Supreme Court will nevertheless examine the exception or exceptions defendant undertakes to have considered on the appeal.

Appeal by defendant from *Burgwyn, Special Judge,*at July Term, 1946, Of HERTFORD.

The defendant was tried upon a bill of indictment charging Mm with the murder of Janie Harrell, and was convicted of murder in the first degree. Thereupon, he was sentenced to death by asphyxiation, as provided by law; and from this judgment, he gave notice of appeal to the Supreme Court.

The appeal *in forma pauperis*was docketed in this Court 14 Oc.tober, 1946, and the appellant’s brief was filed the same date.

The Attorney-General moves to dismiss the appeal under Rules 17 and 28.

*Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorneys-General Bruton, Rhodes, and Moody for the State.*

*W. W. Jones and J. William Copeland for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

This appeal should have been docketed in this Court on or before 10 :00 a.m., Tuesday, 3 September, 1946, and appellant’s brief filed by noon 7 September, 1946. Rules 5 and 28 of the Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N. C., 546 and 562, *et seq. Pruitt v. Wood,*199 N. C., 788, 156 S. E., 126.

We also find that the affidavit upon which the order for appeal *in forma pauperis*is based, was made more than ten days after the adjournment of the term of court at which the defendant was tried. Such affidavit must be made during the term or within ten days of the adjournment thereof, G. S., 15-182, otherwise this Court does not acquire jurisdiction of the appeal, *S. v. Holland,*211 N. C., 284, 189 S. E., 761; *S. v. Stafford,*203 N. C., 601, 166 S. E., 734.

Even though we have no jurisdiction to hear this appeal, since the life of the defendant is involved, we have examined the only exception the defendant undertakes to have this Court consider on the appeal. The exception is without merit and would not be sustained if the appeal were properly before us.

The record proper having been docketed in this Court, the judgment of the court below is affirmed and the motion of the Attorney-General is allowed.

Appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 27 (Thursday, February 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7782]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3240]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Social Security Administration


Rescission of Social Security Acquiescence Ruling 87-3(9)

AGENCY: Social Security Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of rescission of Social Security Acquiescence Ruling 87-
3(9)-Hart v. Bowen, 799 F.2d 567 (9th Cir. 1986).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with 20 CFR 416.1485(e) and 422.406(b)(2), the 
Commissioner of Social Security gives notice of the rescission of 
Social Security Acquiescence Ruling 87-3(9).

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 9, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary Sargent, Litigation Staff, Social 
Security Administration, 6401 Security Blvd., Baltimore, MD 21235, 
(410) 965-1695.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A Social Security Acquiescence Ruling 
explains how we will apply a holding in a decision of a United States 
Court of Appeals that we determine conflicts with our interpretation of 
a provision of the Social Security Act or regulations when the 
Government has decided not to seek further review of the case or is 
unsuccessful on further review.
    As provided by 20 CFR 416.1485(e)(4), a Social Security 
Acquiescence Ruling may be rescinded as obsolete if we subsequently 
clarify, modify or revoke the regulation or ruling that was the subject 
of the circuit court holding for which the Acquiescence Ruling was 
issued.
    On May 6, 1987, we issued Acquiescence Ruling 87-3(9) to reflect 
the holding in Hart v. Bowen, 799 F.2d 567 (9th Cir. 1986), that the 
current market value of an installment sales contract resulting from 
the sale of an individual's excluded home is part of the value of the 
replacement home and thus excluded from countable resources for 
Supplemental Security Income (SSI) purposes, provided the payments 
generated by the installment sales contract were reinvested in the 
excluded replacement home within three months of receipt of the 
payments.
    On August 23, 1994, we published our final regulation (59 FR 
43283), revising section 416.1212 of Social Security Regulations No. 16 
(20 CFR 416.1212), to clarify when the proceeds from the sale of an 
excluded home, including the value of a promissory note or similar 
installment sales contract and other proceeds from the sale (the 
downpayment and monthly installment payments toward the principal), 
will be excluded from being considered SSI resources. Because this 
regulation addresses the Hart court's concerns and contains a thorough 
explanation concerning how we treat proceeds from the sale of an 
excluded home, we are rescinding Acquiescence Ruling
87-3(9).

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Programs No. 93.807 
Supplemental Security Income.)

    Dated: February 1, 1995.
Shirley S. Chater,
Commissioner of Social Security.
[FR Doc. 95-3240 Filed 2-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4190-29-P
# **Exhibit 32.1**

# ** **

## **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Petrohawk EnergyCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of theundersigned officers of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | By:                                                   | /s/ Floyd C. Wilson  |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|--------|
|   | Floyd C. Wilson President, Chief Executive            |
|   | Officer, and Chairman of the Board of  Directors      |
|   | August 13, 2004                                  |
|   |                                                  |
|   |                                                  |
|   | By:                                                   | /s/ Shane M. Bayless |   |
|   | Shane M. Bayless                                      |
|   | Vice President-Chief Financial Officer and  Treasurer |
|   | August 13, 2004                                  |

 

----
EXHIBIT
    99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Lincare Holdings Inc.
  (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities
  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John P. Byrnes,
  Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge
  and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)  information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.





By:
    
    /s/    JOHN P.
      BYRNESJohn P. Byrnes
      Chief Executive
Officer





March 31, 2003





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Lincare Holdings Inc.
  (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities
  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul G. Gabos,
  Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge
  and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)  information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.





By:
    
    /s/    PAUL G.
      GABOSPaul G. Gabos
      Chief Financial
Officer


March 31, 2003
Document

Exhibit 10.4

JOINDER
The undersigned is executing and delivering this Joinder pursuant to the Reclassification Agreement dated as of June 30, 2022 (as amended, modified and supplemented from time to time, the “Reclassification Agreement”), by and among Constellation Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and the other persons named as parties therein (including pursuant to other Joinders).  Capitalized terms used herein have the meaning set forth in the Reclassification Agreement.
By executing and delivering this Joinder to the Company, the undersigned hereby agrees to become a party to, to be bound by, and to comply with the provisions of, the Reclassification Agreement as a Stockholder in the same manner as if the undersigned were an original signatory to the Reclassification Agreement, and the undersigned will be deemed for all purposes to be a Stockholder and the undersigned’s Class A Common Stock will be deemed for all purposes to be Covered Shares under the Reclassification Agreement.
Accordingly, the undersigned has executed and delivered this Joinder as of the ___ day of ____________, 20___.
____________________________________
Signature


____________________________________
Print Name
Address:_____________________________  ________________________________________________________________________ 


Agreed and Accepted as of
________________, 20___:


CONSTELLATION BRANDS, INC.
By: ________________________
Its: ________________________
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, AS AMENDED
  
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended December
31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:February 11, 2009/s/ Pervez A. Qureshi
Pervez A. QureshiPresident and Chief Executive Officer
gaia_ex10-2.htm


Exhibit 10.2












 


 




 


Peter P. Hedly


13140 70th Lane NE


Kirkland, WA 98034






















January 31, 2011







Gaia Remedies, Inc.


13140 70th Lane NE


Kirkland  WA 98034


 







To Whom It May Concern:







I hereby agree to advance and loan up to USD $100,000  to Gaia Remedies, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on an as needed and as requested basis, to finance the business operations and expenses of the Company during the period ending June 30, 2012.

















/s/ Peter P. Hedly


PETER P. HEDLY
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
|   |
|   |   |
| 1.     | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of American Superconductor Corporation; and |
|   |
|   |   |
| 2.     | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |
|   |
|   |   |   |   |
| Date:  | June 7, 2018 | By: | /s/ JOHN W. KOSIBA, JR. |
|   |   |   | John W. Kosiba, Jr. |
|   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer |
Order entered January 13, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00519-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.V. AND S.V., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-04-11968

ORDER

Before the Court is appellee’s January 12, 2017 motion to extend time to file appellee’s 

brief. Appellee’s motion is GRANTED to the extent that appellee’s brief shall be filed by 

February 13, 2017.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.1

       CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NASB Financial, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2007, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, David H. Hancock, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.


February 8, 2008           By: /s/ David H. Hancock
                               David H. Hancock
                               Chairman and Chief
                                 Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to NASB Financial, Inc. and will be retained by NASB
Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.


This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein , and not for
any other purpose.

<Page>
EXHIBIT 23.02





Information Regarding Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP





Section 11(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), provides that if part of a registration statement at the time it becomes effective contains an untrue statement of a material fact, or omits a
material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading, any person acquiring a security pursuant to such registration statement (unless it is proved that at the time of such acquisition such person
knew of such untruth or omission) may assert a claim against, among others, an accountant who has consented to be named as having certified any part of the registration statement or as having prepared any report for use in connection with the
registration statement.





Education Management Corporation dismissed Arthur Andersen LLP (Arthur
Andersen) as its independent auditors, effective May 9, 2002. For additional information, see the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 14, 2002. After reasonable efforts, the Company has been unable to obtain Arthur
Andersens written consent to the incorporation by reference into the Companys registration statements (Form S-8 File Nos. 333-20057, 333-20073, 333-31398, 333-76096, 333-76654 and 333-85518) and the related prospectuses (the
Registration Statements) of Arthur Andersens audit report with respect to the Companys consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2001 and for the two years in the period then ended. Under these circumstances, Rule 437a
under the Securities Act permits the Company to file the Annual Report on Form 10-K, which is incorporated by reference into the Registration Statements, without a written consent from Arthur Andersen. As a result, with respect to transactions in
the Companys securities pursuant to the Registration Statements that occur subsequent to the date this Annual Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Arthur Andersen will not have any liability under Section 11(a) of the
Securities Act for any untrue statements of a material fact contained in the financial statements audited by Arthur Andersen or any omissions of a material fact required to be stated therein and thus no claim could be asserted against Arthur
Andersen under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act.
**EXHIBIT 32****Section 906 Certification**Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officers of Interstate Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certify, to suchofficers’ knowledge, that:(i) the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months endedMarch 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section15(d), as applicable, of the securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated:May 8, 2006     /s/ THOMAS F. HEWITT     Thomas F. Hewitt  Chief Executive Officer     /s/ BRUCE A. RIGGINS     Bruce A. Riggins  Chief Financial Officer