Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 33 / Friday, February 17, 1995 / Notices 9327

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 20, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase

From People Who Are Blind or Severely

Disabled, Crystal Square 3, Suite 403,

1735 Jefferson Davis Highway,

Arlington, Virginia 22202–3461.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Beverly Milkman, (703) 603–7740.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July

15, 1994, the Committee for Purchase

From People Who Are Blind or Severely

Disabled published notice (59 FR 36169)

of proposed addition to the Procurement

List.

Comments were received from one of

the current contractors, which indicated

that addition of these transparency films

to the Procurement List would have a

severe impact on the company due to

lost sales and loss of the ability to

purchase raw materials in large enough

quantities to get more favorable prices

from its suppliers. The percentage of the

company’s sales which it would lose is

not large enough, in the Committee’s

judgement, to constitute severe adverse

impact on the contractor. The contractor

did not indicate how great an impact it

would sustain by purchasing raw

materials in lesser quantities, except to

speculate that it could be placed at a

great competitive disadvantage in both

the commercial and Government

markets. Accordingly, the Committee

has concluded that even if this impact

is added to the sales loss, the contractor

will not suffer severe adverse impact as

a result of addition of these

transparency films to the Procurement

List.

After consideration of the material

presented to it concerning capability of

qualified nonprofit agencies to provide

the commodities, fair market price, and

impact of the addition on the current or

most recent contractors, the Committee

has determined that the commodities

listed below are suitable for

procurement by the Federal Government

under 41 U.S.C. 46–48c and 41 CFR 51–

2.4. I certify that the following action

will not have a significant impact on a

substantial number of small entities.

The major factors considered for this

certification were:

1. The action will not result in any

additional reporting, recordkeeping or

other compliance requirements for small

entities other than the small

organizations that will furnish the

commodities to the Government.

2. The action does not appear to have

a severe economic impact on current

contractors for the commodities.

3. The action will result in

authorizing small entities to furnish the

commodities to the Government.

4. There are no known regulatory

alternatives which would accomplish

the objectives of the Javits-WagnerO’Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46–48c) in

connection with the commodities

proposed for addition to the

Procurement List.

Accordingly, the following

commodities are hereby added to the

Procurement List:

Transparency Film, Xerographic

7530–00–NIB–0099 (Clear)

7530–00–NIB–0100 (Color)

7530–00–NIB–0101 (Clear w/strip).

This action does not affect current

contracts awarded prior to the effective

date of this addition or options

exercised under those contracts.

Beverly L. Milkman,

Executive Director.

[FR Doc. 95–4052 Filed 2–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820–33–P

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army

Army Science Board; Notice of Closed

Meeting

In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of

the Federal Advisory Committee Act

(P.L. 92–463), announcement is made of

the following Committee Meeting:

Name of Committee: Army Science Board

(ASB).

Date of Meeting: March 7, 1995.

Time of Meeting: 1000–1600.

Place: Pentagon—Washington, DC.

Agenda: The Army Science Board’s

Acquisition Reform Issue Group will meet to

discuss the analysis of ‘‘Industry Data

Concerning Their Management and Oversight

Costs.’’ This meeting will be closed to the

public in accordance with Section 552b(c) of

Title 5 U.S.C., specifically subparagraph (4)

thereof, and Title 5, U.S.C., Appendix 2,

subsection 10(d). The proprietary matters to

be discussed are so inextricably intertwined

so as to preclude opening any portion of the

meeting. The ASB Administrative Officer,

Sally Warner, may be contacted for further

information at (703) 695–0781.

Sally A. Warner,

Administrative Officer, Army Science Board.

[FR Doc. 95–4216 Filed 2–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710–08–M

Army Science Board; Notice of Open

Meeting

In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of

the Federal Advisory Committee Act

(P.L. 92–463), announcement is made of

the following Committee Meeting:

Name of Committee: Army Science Board

(ASB).

Date of Meeting: March 7 and 8, 1995.

Time of Meeting:

0900–1600, March 7, 1995.

0900–1200, March 8, 1995.

Place: Aberdeen Proving Grounds, MD.

Agenda: The Army Science Board (ASB)

Analysis, Test and Evaluation Issue Group

will hold a meeting on ‘‘The Impact of

Personnel Reductions on Mission

Accomplishment Within the Army

Analytical Community.’’ This meeting will

be open to the public. Any interested person

may attend, appear before, or file statements

with the committee at the time and in the

manner permitted by the committee. The

ASB Administrative Officer, Sally Warner,

may be contacted for further information at

(703) 695–0781.

Sally A. Warner,

Administrative Officer, Army Science Board.

[FR Doc. 95–4218 Filed 2–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710–08–M

Department of the Navy

Notice of Intent to Prepare an

Environmental Impact Statement/

Environmental Impact Report for

Treated Effluent Disposal from Marine

Corps Base Camp Pendleton to the

City of Oceanside, California

Pursuant to the National

Environmental Policy Act as

implemented by Council on

Environmental Quality regulations (40

CFR Parts 1500–1508), and pursuant to

the California Environmental Quality

Act (CA Public Resources Code Sec et.

seq. 21000) the U.S. Marine Corps and

City of Oceanside intend to prepare a

joint Environmental Impact Statement/

Environmental Impact Report (EIS/EIR)

to evaluate the environmental effects of

the disposal of treated effluent from five

existing sewage treatment plants at

Marine Corps Base (MCB) Camp

Pendleton to the City of Oceanside,

California.

The proposed action would construct

two new sewage pipelines to connect

five existing sewage treatment plants in

the Santa Margarita Basin in MCB Camp

Pendleton to existing sewage outfalls in

the City of Oceanside. One proposed

pipeline would transport treated

effluent from three existing sewage

treatment plants at MCB Camp

Pendleton to the existing outfall serving

the La Salina sewage treatment plant in

the City of Oceanside. A second

proposed pipeline would transport

treated effluent from two existing

sewage treatment plants at MCB Camp

Pendleton to the existing outfall serving

the San Luis Rey sewage treatment plant

in the City of Oceanside. All effluent

from these pipelines at MCB Camp

Pendleton would then be transported for

ocean disposal via existing City of

Oceanside land and ocean outfalls. No
9328 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 33 / Friday, February 17, 1995 / Notices

additional treatment of MCB Camp

Pendleton effluent would be provided

by City of Oceanside sewage treatment

plants.

Alternatives currently under

consideration that will be addressed in

the EIS/EIR include construction of a

new tertiary sewage treatment plant at

MCB Camp Pendleton, upgrade and

consolidation of existing sewage

treatment plants, injection wells,

percolation ponds, and no action.

Alternative pipeline alignments will

also be evaluated.

Major environmental issues that will

be addressed in the EIS/EIR include

land use, hydrology, water quality, air

quality, biological resources, cultural

resources, noise, traffic/circulation/

access, public services and utilities,

human health and safety, and hazardous

materials and waste management.

The Department of the Navy

published a Notice Of Intent in the

Federal Register on September 26, 1991,

initiating a scoping process for

preparation of an EIS/EIR for a sewage

effluent compliance project at MCB

Camp Pendleton for the San Onofre and

Santa Margarita Basins. A scoping

meeting was held in the City of

Oceanside on October 17, 1991, and an

EIS/EIR was begun. Since that time, the

proposed action has been revised as

additional studies have been

undertaken, and additional alternatives

have been identified that needed to be

evaluated. While the EIS/EIR for the San

Onofre basin is continuing, the EIS/EIR

for the Santa Margarita basin is

beginning. Therefore, the scoping

process is being reopened until March 6,

1995, in order to collect additional

comments on the scope of issues to be

addressed in the EIS/EIR for the Santa

Margarita basin proposed action.

However, no additional scoping

meetings will be held.

Agencies and the public are invited

and encouraged to provide written

comment on scoping issues. To be most

helpful, scoping comments should

clearly describe specific issues or topics

which the commentor believes the EIS/

EIR should address. Written statements

and or questions regarding the scoping

process should be mailed no later than

March 6, 1995 to Commanding Officer,

Southwest Division, Naval Facilities

Engineering Command, 1220 Pacific

Highway, San Diego, California 92132–

5190, (Attn: Ms. Sheila Donovan, Code

2032), telephone (619) 532–3624.

Dated: February 13, 1995.

Robert Watkins,

Colonel, USMC, Head, Land Use and Military

Construction Branch, Facilities and Services

Division, Installations and Logistics

Department.

[FR Doc. 95–3983 Filed 2–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3810–AE–P

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. EG95–30–000, et al.]

Austin Cogeneration Partners, L.P., et

al.; Electric Rate and Corporate

Regulation Filings

February 10, 1995.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Austin Cogeneration Partners, L.P.

[Docket No. EG95–30–000]

On February 6, 1995, Austin

Cogeneration Partners, L.P.

(‘‘Applicant’’) filed with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission an

application for determination of exempt

wholesale generator status pursuant to

18 CFR Part 365.

Applicant is a Delaware limited

partnership formed to acquire an

ownership interest in a 255 MW natural

gas-fired cogeneration facility to be

located in the City of Austin, Texas,

and/or operate such facility and engage

in project development activities with

respect thereto.

Comment date: March 6, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice. The

Commission will limit its consideration

of comments to those that concern the

adequacy or accuracy of the application.

2. Louis Dreyfus Electric Power, Inc.

[Docket No. ER92–850–010]

Take notice that on January 26, 1995,

Louis Dreyfus Electric Power, Inc.

(Louis Dreyfus) filed information

required by the Commission’s December

2, 1992 letter order in Docket No. ER92–

850–000. Copies of Louis Dreyfus’

informational filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

3. North American Energy

Conservation, Inc.

[Docket No. ER94–152–004]

Take notice that on January 30, 1995,

North American Energy Conservation,

Inc. (North American) filed information

required by the Commission’s February

10, 1994 letter order in Docket No.

ER94–152–000. Copies of North

American’s informational filing are on

file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection.

4. Howell Power Systems, Inc.

[Docket No. ER94–178–004]

Take notice that on January 30, 1995,

Howell Power Systems, Inc. (Howell

Power) filed information required by the

Commission’s January 14, 1994 letter

order in Docket No. ER94–178–000.

Copies of Howell Power’s informational

filing are on file with the Commission

and are available for public inspection.

5. LG&E Power Marketing, Inc.

[Docket No. ER94–1188–004]

Take notice that on January 30, 1995,

LG&E Power Marketing, Inc. (LG&E)

filed information required by the

Commission’s August 19, 1994 order in

Docket No. ER94–1188–000. Copies of

LG&E’s informational filing are on file

with the Commission and are available

for public inspection.

6. Valero Power Services Co.

[Docket No. ER94–1394–002]

Take notice that on January 30, 1995,

Valero Power Services (Valero Power)

filed information required by the

Commission’s August 24, 1994 letter

order in Docket No. ER94–1394–000.

Copies of Valero Power’s informational

filing are on file with the Commission

and are available for public inspection.

7. Coastal Electric Services Co.

[Docket No. ER94–1450–001]

Take notice that on January 30, 1995,

Coastal Electric Services Company

(Coastal Services) filed information

required by the Commission’s

September 29, 1994 letter order in

Docket No. ER94–1450–000. Copies of

Coastal Services’ informational filing are

on file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection.

8. Calpine Power Marketing

[Docket No. ER94–1545–000]

Take notice that on February 8, 1995,

Calpine Power Marketing, Inc. (CPMI),

filed an amendment to its petition to the

Commission for acceptance of CPMI

Revised Rate Schedule FERC No. 1; the

granting of certain blanket approvals,

including the authority to sell electricity

at market-based rates; and the waiver of

certain Commission regulations. CPMI

is a direct subsidiary of Calpine

Corporation which, through other

subsidiaries, owns and operates nonutility generating facilities and related

business ventures in the United States.

Calpine Corporation is indirectly and

partially owned by CS Holding of