alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation

# Time and Date:

1:30 p.m., Wednesday, February 17, 2016.

# Place:

NeighborWorks America—Gramlich Boardroom, 999 North Capitol Street NE., Washington, DC 20002.

# Status:

Open (with the exception of Executive Sessions).

# Contact Person:

                        Jeffrey Bryson, General Counsel/Secretary, (202) 760-4101;                         *jbryson@nw.org*.                    

# AGENDA:

I. Call to Order

II. Status Update from the External Auditor

III. Executive Session with the External Auditor

IV. Executive Session with the Chief Audit Executive

V. Executive Session: Pending Litigation

VI. Internal Audit Reports with Management's Response

VII. Internal Audit Status Reports

VIII. Compliance Update

IX. OHTS Watch List Review

X. Adjournment

The General Counsel of the Corporation has certified that in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4) permit closure of the following portions of this meeting:
    - Executive Session with the External Auditor
    - Executive Session with the Chief Audit Executive
    - Executive Session—Pending Litigation

Jeffrey T. Bryson,

EVP & General Counsel/Corporate Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2016-02944 Filed 2-9-16; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 7570-02-P
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 32 (Thursday, February 16, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9055]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3927]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Human Resource Development; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Human Resources Development 
(#1199).
    Date and Time: March 8, 1995: 7 p.m. to 9:30 p.m.; March 9,1995: 
8 a.m. to 5 p.m.; March 10, 1995: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Rooms 
370/380, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact person: Lola E. Rogers, Program Director, Human Resource 
Development Division, Room 815, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230 Telephone: (703) 306-1637.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate Model Projects for Women and 
Girls proposals as part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: February 13, 1995.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-3927 Filed 2-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
#### Elisha Rose v. Jane Thompson.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements for printing.

Opinion by

Landon, J.
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Detailed Single Year TablesUpdated May 3, 2006   |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|

| Taxation of Benefits | Description of Proposed Provision:      Tax Social Security benefits in a manner similar to private pension income beginning in 2006.  Phase out the lower-income thresholds during 2006-2015. |
|----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions      of the 2005 Trustees Report*

       Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program                Percentage of taxable payroll           Trust fundratio as ofJanuary 1CalendaryearCostrateIncomerateAnnualbalance 200511.1312.721.59 320200611.0012.811.81 337200710.9512.861.91 356200810.9912.941.96 372200911.1212.971.85 386201011.2513.041.79 399201111.4213.191.77 411201211.6713.271.60 420201311.9313.341.41 428201412.2113.381.17 434201512.4913.410.93 438201612.7813.430.65 439201713.0913.450.36 439201813.4013.460.07 437201913.7113.48-0.23 434202014.0313.49-0.53 429202114.3413.51-0.83 422202214.6513.52-1.13 414202314.9513.53-1.42 404202415.2513.54-1.70 394202515.5413.56-1.99 382202615.8313.57-2.27 369202716.1013.58-2.52 354202816.3313.58-2.75 340202916.5513.59-2.96 324203016.7413.59-3.15 308203116.9213.59-3.33 291203217.0813.59-3.48 274203317.2013.59-3.61 256203417.3013.59-3.70 238203517.3713.59-3.79 220203617.4313.58-3.85 201203717.4813.58-3.90 182203817.5013.57-3.93 162203917.5113.56-3.95 143204017.5213.56-3.96 123204117.5213.55-3.97 102204217.5313.55-3.98 81204317.5313.55-3.98 60204417.5413.55-3.99 38204517.5513.55-3.99 16204617.5613.56-4.00 ----204717.5813.56-4.02 ----204817.6013.56-4.03 ----204917.6213.57-4.05 ----205017.6413.57-4.07 ----205117.6813.57-4.11 ----205217.7113.57-4.14 ----205317.7513.58-4.18 ----205417.8013.58-4.22 ----205517.8413.58-4.26 ----205617.8913.59-4.31 ----205717.9513.59-4.36 ----205818.0013.59-4.41 ----205918.0513.59-4.46 ----206018.1013.60-4.51 ----206118.1613.60-4.56 ----206218.2213.60-4.62 ----206318.2813.60-4.68 ----206418.3413.60-4.74 ----206518.4013.61-4.79 ----206618.4613.61-4.85 ----206718.5213.61-4.91 ----206818.5713.62-4.96 ----206918.6313.62-5.01 ----207018.6713.62-5.06 ----207118.7213.62-5.10 ----207218.7713.62-5.15 ----207318.8113.62-5.19 ----207418.8513.63-5.23 ----207518.9013.63-5.27 ----207618.9413.63-5.31 ----207718.9913.64-5.35 ----207819.0313.64-5.39 ----207919.0813.64-5.43 ----208019.1213.65-5.48 ----Summarized RatesYearsCostrateIncomerateActuarialbalance         Change inactuarialbalance2005-207915.79%14.2%-1.59%0.33% Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map
#### Albert B. Parker, Plaintiff, v Samuel Loring, Defendant.

—Judgment for defendant upon submitted case, with costs. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 23

- 00237

- CV

M ARVIN H UNT AND M ICHAEL S MITH

, Appellants

V

.

C ENTREPORT L

ANDING A PARTMENTS

, Appellee §

§

§

§ On Appeal from Coun t y Court at Law

No. 1

of Tarrant County ( 2023

- 003399

- 1 )

December 21, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of

prosecution

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Brian Walker

Justice Brian Walker
#### Renata Gerbino, Appellant, v Anthony Gerbino, Respondent.

[772 NYS2d 573]

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated June 10, 1992, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marks, J.H.O.), dated February 19, 2003, which denied her motion for leave to renew a prior motion to set aside a stipulation of settlement dated December 27, 1999, which was denied by order of the same court dated April 3, 2002.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

A motion for leave to renew must be supported by new or additional facts “not offered on the prior motion that would change the prior determination,” and “shall contain reasonable justification for the failure to present such facts on the prior motion” (CPLR 2221 [e] [2], [3]; *see Gorman v Ochoa,*2 AD3d 582 [2003]; *Bhoj v Bargold Stor. Sys.,*303 AD2d 437 [2003]). Here, the plaintiff failed to show that the additional facts were unavailable to her at the time of the hearing and did not provide a reasonable justification for failing to offer them at that time. Krausman, J.P., Schmidt, Cozier and Mastro, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 23 (Thursday, February 4, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 6096]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02265]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 9432]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Every People Under Heaven: Jerusalem, 1000-1400'' 
Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257-1 of December 11, 2015), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Every People Under Heaven: Jerusalem, 
1000-1400,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at 
The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York, from on about 
September 20, 2016, until on or about January 8, 2017, and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the 
national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the imported objects, contact the Office of Public Diplomacy 
and Public Affairs in the Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department 
of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c1b2a4a2b5a8aeaff3f5f4f881b2b5a0b5a4efa6aeb7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ff8c9a9c8b969091cdcbcac6bf8c8b9e8b9ad1989089">[email protected]</span></a>). The 
mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: January 29, 2016.
Mark Taplin,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2016-02265 Filed 2-3-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### E. F. YOUNG, Receiver of BANK OF COATS, v. A. A. McDONALD, CHICKAMAUGA TRUST COMPANY, Trustee, and PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA.

(Filed 15 October, 1930.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *Lyon, Emergency Judge,*at April Term, 1930, of HarNETt.

Affirmed.

*E. F. Young for plaintiff.*

*John N. Duncan for defendant, Chickamauga Trust Company, Trus-, Lee, and Prudential Insurance Company.*

Per Curiam.

This is an action brought by E. F. Young, receiver of Bank of Coats, who held a second lien on the land in controversy, to restrain the defendants, Chickamauga Trust Company, trustee, and Prudential Insurance Company, of America, from selling under its first lien. The answer of said defendants, Chickamauga Trust Company, trustee, and Prudential Insurance Company of America, set up *811tbe plea of *res judicata,*that defendant, A. A. McDonald and wife, Mary Eeade McDonald, the makers of both liens, had theretofore brought an action to restrain defendant, Chickamauga Trust Company, trustee, from selling, “alleging as a basis of said action that there was no delinquent installments of principal and interest due on said note and upon the pleadings and affidavits in said action, Judge N. A. Sinclair found as a fact that the said installments were delinquent and ordered the restraining order issued in that action dissolved. The said A. A. McDonald appealed to the Supreme Court from said judgment, but never perfected said appeal, and it was dismissed under Supreme Court Eule 10, and judgment certified down to the clerk of the Superior Court of Harnett County. These defendants say that the allegations contained in paragraph 9 of the complaint in this action involve a question which is *res judicata*and ask that the pleadings, affidavits and judgments rendered in the action brought by A. A. McDonald and wife, Mary Eeade McDonald, against these defendants be considered a part of this answer by reference thereto as fully as if set out herein.”

The above matter of *res judicata],*the affidavit of defendant, A. A. McDonald, and the affidavit of M. M. Elliott, president of the defendant, Chickamauga Trust Company, trustee, were all in evidence in the court below.

The court below rendered the following judgment: “This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned judge of the Superior Court, and being heard upon the pleadings and affidavits of plaintiffs and defendants : It is hereupon ordered and adjudged that the restraining order heretofore issued in this ease be, and the same is hereby dissolved, the court having found as a fact that the deed of trust from A. A. McDonald and wife to the Chickamauga Trust Company, trustee, is a prior lien to that of the Bank of Coats, and the said defendants are hereby permitted to proceed to foreclose their deed of trust.”

The judgment of the court below is affirmed on authority of *Roebuck v. Carson,*197 N. C., 492.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO\
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report of Alec Bradley Cigar
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Alan Rubin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Date:  November 10, 2005


/s/ Alan Rubin
--------------
Alan Rubin
Chief Executive Officer
## Detailed Single Year Tables

- Individual Provisions
- Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable)

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						E3.1: Increase the taxable maximum such that 90 percent of earnings would be subject to the payroll tax (phased in 2024-2033). Provide benefit credit for earnings up to the revised taxable maximum.**

### Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program

### Summarized Estimates
#### John Flynn and others, as Commissioners, etc., Respondents, v. Thomas F. Cornell, as Commissioner, etc., Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Opinion by

Landon, J.
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 28 (Thursday, February 11, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 7337]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02820]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0393; FRL-9941-55]


Registration Review Interim Decisions; Notice of Availability; 
Correction

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA issued a notice in the Federal Register of October 15, 
2015, concerning Registration Review Interim Decisions, Notice of 
Availability. This document corrects a typographical error.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Dumas, Pesticide Re-Evaluation 
Division, (7508P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental 
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001; telephone number: (703) 308-8015; email address: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4125342c20326f33282229203325012431206f262e37"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="690d1c04081a471b000a01081b0d290c1908470e061f">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    The Agency included in the October 15, 2015 notice a list of those 
who may be potentially affected by this action.

B. How can I get copies of this document and other related information?

    The docket for this action, identified by docket identification 
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0393, is available at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory 
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency 
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 
1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public 
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public 
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP 
Docket is (703) 305-5805. Please review the visitor instructions and 
additional information about the docket available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

II. What does this correction do?

    FR Doc. 2015-26299 published in the Federal Register of October 15, 
2015 (80 FR 62069) (FRL-9934-06) is corrected as follows:
    1. On page 62071, in the second column, at the end of the document, 
the signature is corrected to read Richard P. Keigwin, Jr.

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.

    Dated: January 27, 2016.
Michael Goodis,
Acting Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide 
Programs.
[FR Doc. 2016-02820 Filed 2-10-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*John T. Cuming v. Joseph Koch and others, Dock Commissioners, etc., Respondents.

Proceedings affirmed.

Opinion by

McComber, J.
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under t he limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir.l Rule

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

______________________

No. 98-60426

______________________

UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY,

Plaintiffs-Appellee

 Cross-Appellants,

versus

KING ENTERPRISES, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant

 Cross-Appellee.

___________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

(3:95-CV-184-S)

___________________________________________________________________

November 5, 1999

Before DUHÉ, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM:*

AFFIRMED. See 5th Cir. Rule 47.6.
## Detailed Single Year Tables

- Individual Provisions
- Level of Monthly Benefits

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						B5.4: Beginning for those newly eligible in 2030, reconfigure the special minimum benefit: (a) A year of coverage is defined as a year in which 4 quarters of coverage are earned. (b) At implementation, set the PIA for 30 years of coverage equal to 125 percent of the monthly poverty level (about $1,416 in 2022). For those with under 30 years of coverage, the PIA per year of coverage over 10 years is $1,416/20 = $70.80. (c) From 2022 to the year of implementation, 2030, index the PIA per year of coverage using the chain-CPI index. Then, for later years, index the PIA per year of coverage by wage growth for successive cohorts. (d) Scale work requirements for disabled workers, based on the number of years of non-disabled potential work.**

### Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program

### Summarized Estimates
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 27 (Thursday, February 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7763-7764]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3188]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-148-000]


Texas Gas Transmission Corp.; Notice of Cash-Out Report

February 3, 1995.
    Take notice that on January 31, 1995, Texas Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Texas Gas), in compliance with the order of the Commission 
issued December 16, 1993 in Texas Gas's Order No. 636 restructuring 
proceeding, in [[Page 7764]] Docket No. RS92-24, et al., submits for 
filing a report which compares its cash-out revenues with cash-out 
costs incurred for the annual period November 1, 1993 through October 
31, 1994.
    Texas Gas states that copies of the filing are being mailed to each 
of Texas Gas's customers, the parties in Docket No. RS92-24-000.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 
20426, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.214 and 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests should 
be filed on or before February 28, 1995. Protests will be considered by 
the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but 
will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. 
Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available 
for public inspection in the public reference room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-3188 Filed 2-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M