7954 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 28 / Friday, February 10, 1995 / Notices

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–3349 Filed 2–9–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Docket Nos. CP93–258–000 et al.]

Mojave Pipeline Co.; Notice of

Availability of the Draft Environmental

Impact Statement for the Proposed

Mojave Northward Expansion Project

February 6, 1995.

The staffs of the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission (FERC) and

California State Lands Commission

(SLC) have prepared this draft

environmental impact report/

environmental impact statement (EIR/

EIS) on the natural gas pipeline facilities

proposed by Mojave Pipeline Operating

Company (Mojave) in the above dockets.

The draft EIR/EIS was prepared to

satisfy the requirements of the National

Environmental Policy Act and the

California Environmental Quality Act.

The staffs of the FERC and SLC believe,

subject to public comment, that

approval of the proposed project, with

appropriate mitigation measures and

receipt of necessary permits and

approvals, has the potential to

significantly impact the environment.

The draft EIR/EIS includes an

evaluation of the proposal.

The FERC and SLC staffs assessed the

potential environmental effects of the

construction and operation of the

proposed Mojave Northward Expansion

Project, which consists of between 660

and 681 miles of pipeline, depending on

final project configuration, including

the following facilities:

• A North Mainline about 290 miles

long from near Bakersfield northward to

Martinez.

• A Sacramento Mainline about 63

miles long from Ripon to southwest

Sacramento.

• Shorter segments, which may

include segments to Lindsay, Famoso,

Coalinga, Kingsburg, Sanger, Livingston,

Turlock, Ceres, Modesto, Tracy,

Oakland, Antioch, Fremont, McFarland,

Malaga, Madera, Fairmead, Ripon,

Lathrop, Hunters Point, and San

Francisco.

• A maximum of about 100 miles of

pipeline loops on the existing Mojave

Mainline, Mojave-Kern River East Side

Lateral, and Mojave-Kern River

Commonline.

• A total of 62,588 to 78,758

horsepower (hp) of compression at three

new compressor stations in California at

Amboy, Daggett, and either Famoso or

Lindsay plus the addition of 24,470 hp

of compression to Mojave’s existing

compressor station at Topock, Arizona.

• Either 55 or 58 new meter stations

depending on the final project

configuration.

The draft EIR/EIS has been placed in

the public files of the FERC and SLC

and is available for public inspection at

the following locations:

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

Division of Public Information, 941

North Capitol Street NE., Room 3104,

Washington, DC 20426, (202) 208–

1371

California State Lands Commission,

1807—13th Street, Sacramento, CA

95814, (916) 322–0530.

Copies have been mailed to Federal,

state, and local agencies, public interest

groups, interested individuals, public

libraries, newspapers, and parties to this

proceeding.

A limited number of copies of the

draft EIR/EIS are available from either of

the following individuals:

Mr. Michael Boyle, Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission,

Environmental Project Manager,

Office of Pipeline Regulation, Room

7312, 825 North Capitol Street NE.,

Washington, DC 20426, (202) 208–

0839

Ms. Mary Griggs, California State Lands

Commission, Environmental Project

Manager, 1807–13th Street,

Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 322–

0354.

Any person wishing to comment on

the draft EIR/EIS may do so. Written

comments must reference Docket Nos.

CP93–258–000 et al. Comments should

be addressed to: Office of the Secretary,

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street NE.,

Washington, DC 20426.

Comments should be filed as soon as

possible but must be received no later

than March 27, 1995, to ensure

consideration prior to a FERC and SLC

decision on this proposal. A copy of any

comments should also be sent to either

Mr. Michael Boyle, FERC

Environmental Project Manager, or Ms.

Mary Griggs, SLC Environmental Project

Manager at their respective addresses

given above.

Comments will be considered by the

FERC and SLC but will not serve to

make the commentor a party to the

proceeding. Any person seeking to

become a party to the proceeding must

file a motion to intervene pursuant to

Rule 214 of the FERC’s Rules of Practice

and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214).

In addition to asking for written

comments, we invite you to attend any

of the public meetings that will be held

at the times and locations listed below.

The meetings will be designed to

provide you with more detailed

information and another opportunity to

offer your comments on the draft EIR/

EIS. Those wanting to speak at the

meetings can call the FERC and SLC

Environmental Project Managers to

preregister their names on the speakers’

list. Those people on the speakers’ list

prior to the date of the meeting will be

allowed to speak first. Priority will be

given to people representing groups. A

transcript of each meeting will be made

so that your comments will be

accurately recorded.

Additional information about this

project is available from Mr. Michael

Boyle, FERC Environmental Review and

Compliance Branch I, Office of Pipeline

Regulation, at (202) 208–0839 on from

Ms. Mary Griggs, SLC, at (916) 322–

0354.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

Schedule for Draft EIR/EIS Public

Meetings

San Francisco, California, February 27,

1995; 3:00 pm to 7:00 pm

Earl P. Mills Community Center, 100

Whitney Young Circle, San

Francisco, California

Livermore, California, February 28,

1995; 7:00 pm

Junction Middle School, 298 Junction

Avenue, Livermore, California

Fresno, California, March 1, 1995; 7:00

pm

Holiday Inn—Fresno Airport, 5090 E.

Clinton Way @ Gateway, Fresno,

California

Barstow, California, March 2, 1995; 7:00

pm

Holiday Inn—Barstow, 1511 East

Main Street, Barstow, California.

[FR Doc. 95–3317 Filed 2–9–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Project Nos. 11181–002, et al.]

Hydroelectric Application [Energy

Storage Partners, et al.]; Notice of

Applications

Take notice that the following

hydroelectric applications have been

filed with the Commission and are

available for public inspection:

1 a. Type of Application: Major

License (Tendering Notice).

b. Project No.: 11181–002.

c. Date filed: November 28, 1994.

d. Applicant: Energy Storage Partners.

e. Name of Project: Lorella Pumped

Storage.

f. Location: On Bureau of Land

Management land, near the towns of
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 28 / Friday, February 10, 1995 / Notices 7955

Lorella and Malin, in Klamath County,

Oregon. T39S, R11E, section 35, T40S,

R12E, section 2, T40S, R12E, section 1,

T40S, R12E, section 12, T40S, R12E,

section 11, T40S, R12E section 14,

T40S, R12E, section 22.

g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power

Act 16 USC §§ 791(a)–825(r).

h. Applicant Contact: Mr. Douglas

Spaulding, Energy Storage Partners, c/o

Independent Hydro Developers, 5402

Parkdale Drive, Minneapolis MN 55416,

(612) 525–1445.

i. FERC Contact: Michael Spencer at

(202) 219–2846.

j. Description of Project: The proposed

pump storage project would consist of:

(1) an upper storage reservoir formed

behind two 178-foot-high embankment

dams, with a maximum surface area of

199 acres, a total reservoir capacity of

16,519 acre-feet, and a maximum

surface elevation of 5,523 feet msl; (2)

a 24-foot-diameter, 4,526-foot-long

tunnel, joining a penstock mainfold

which divides the power tunnel into 4

penstocks; (3) each penstock will have

a 12-foot-diameter, and 355-foot-length;

(4) a powerhouse/pump station

containing 4 motor/generator and

pump/turbine units with a total

installed capacity of 1,000 MW and

producing an estimated average annual

generation of 1,927 Gwh; (5) a 1,500-

foot-long, 38-foot-square D-shaped

concrete tailrace tunnel; (6) a lower

storage reservoir formed behind a 57-

foot-high embankment dam, with a

maximum surface area of 405 acres, a

total reservoir capacity of 18,646 acrefeet, and a maximum surface elevation

of 4,191 feet msl; (7) an 4-mile-long,

500–Kv transmission line

interconnecting with the existing area

transmission system; and (8)

appurtenant facilities. Water for the

project would be supplied by three

wells. The cost of the project is

estimated at $1,174,249,000.

k. With this notice, we are initiating

consultation with the STATE HISTORIC

PRESERVATION OFFICER (SHPO), as

required by section 106, National

Historic Preservation Act, and the

regulations of the Advisory council on

Historic Preservation, 36 CFR § 800.4.

l. Under Section 4.32 (b)(7) of the

Commission’s regulations (18 CFR), if

any resource agency, Indian Tribe, or

person believes that the applicant

should conduct an additional scientific

study to form an adequate factual basis

for a complete analysis of the

application on its merits, they must file

a request for the study with the

Commission, not later than 60 days after

the date of this notice, and must serve

a copy of the request on the applicant.

2 a. Type of Application: Surrender of

Exemption (5MW of Less).

b. Project No: 10325–005.

c. Date Filed: November 17, 1994.

d. Applicant: Draper Irrigation

Company.

e. Name of Project: Big Willow Creek

Project.

f. Location: Big Willow Creek in Salt

Lake County, Utah.

g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power

Act, 16 U.S.C. § 791(a)–825(r).

h. Applicant Contact: W. S.

Mickelsen, Draper Irrigation Company

12421 South 800 East, P. O. Box 275,

Draper, UT 84 020, (801) 571–2232.

i. FERC Contact: Tom Papsidero, (202)

219–2715.

j. Comment Date: February 28, 1995.

k. Description of Proposed Action:

The project is entirely unconstructed

and was proposed to consist of a

powerhouse at elevation 4,990 feet

m.s.l. containing a single generating unit

with an installed capacity of 550 Kw.

Water discharged from the powerhouse

was to enter the Draper Irrigation

Company water treatment facility. The

average annual energy production was

estimated by the applicant to be 2,107

Mwh.

The exemptee is requesting surrender

of the exemption because the project is

not economically feasible.

l. This notice also consists of the

following standard paragraphs: B, C1,

and D2.

3 a. Type of Application: Preliminary

Permit.

b. Project No.: 11510–000.

c. Date filed: December 6, 1994.

d. Applicant: Alaska Business and

Industrial Development Corp.

e. Name of Project: Allison Lake.

f. Location: On Allison Lake, near the

town of Valdez, in the Third Judicial

District, Alaska.

g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power

Act 16 USC §§ 791(a)–825(r).

h. Applicant Contact: Mr. Fred G.

Brown, AK BIDCORP, 1459 Holy Cross

Drive, Fairbanks, AK 99701, (907) 451–

2898.

i. FERC Contact: Michael Spencer at

(202) 219–2846.

j. Comment Date: April 14, 1995.

k. Description of Project: The

proposed project would consist of: (1) a

lake tap on the state of Alaska’s Allison

Lake, which has a surface area of 258

acres and 19,980 acre-feet of useable

storage; (2) a 10,200-foot-long, 8-footdiameter power tunnel; (3) a 2,450-footlong, 48-inch-diameter penstock; (4) a

powerhouse containing two generating

units with a combined capacity of 8.0

MW and an average annual generation

of 37.25 Gwh; and (5) a 3.5-mile-long

transmission line.

No new access road will be needed to

conduct the studies. The applicant

estimates that the cost of the studies to

be conducted under the preliminary

permit would be $50,000.

l. Purpose of Project: Project power

would be sold.

m. This notice also consists of the

following standard paragraphs: A5, A7,

A9, A10, B, C, and D2.

4 a. Type of Application: Revised

Recreation Plan.

b. Project No: 2310–073.

c. Date Filed: January 6, 1995.

d. Applicant: Pacific Gas & Electric

Company.

e. Name of Project: Drum-Spaulding

Hydroelectric Project.

f. Location: In Placer and Nevada

Counties, California, including the

following water bodies: Carr Lake;

Upper Feeley Lake; Middle and Lower

Lindsey Lakes; Culbertson Lake; Upper

and Lower Rock Lakes; Lake Spaulding;

Fuller Lake; Rucker Lake; Blue Lake;

Lake Valley Reservoir; Kelly Lake;

Meadow Lake; Lake Fordyce; Lake

Sterling; White Rock Lake; Halsey

Forebay; Rock Creek Reservoir; Halsey

Afterbay; Alta Forebay; Drum Forebay;

and Deer Creek Forebay.

g. Filed Pursuant to: 18 CFR 4.200.

h. Applicant Contact: Ms. Rhonda

Shiffman Pacific Gas & Electric

Company, 201 Mission Street, Room

1012, San Francisco, CA 94177, (415)

973–5310.

i. FERC Contact: Steve Hocking (202)

219–2656.

j. Comment Date: March 17, 1995.

k. Description of Amendment: Pacific

Gas & Electric Company (PG&E) filed a

revised recreation plan for the DrumSpaulding Hydroelectric Project. PG&E

requests Commission approval of the

plan which would allow PG&E to

construct new, and improve existing,

facilities at many recreation sites

throughout the Drum-Spaulding project

area. The plan includes the following

type of proposed changes: new

dispersed camping areas; added

trailhead parking; rehabilitation of

existing campgrounds; added signage,

fencing, and fishing access. For

complete information on the proposed

changes to individual recreation sites,

please call the applicant or FERC

contact listed above.

l. This notice also consists of the

following standard paragraphs: B, C1,

and D2.

5 a. Type of Application: Major

License.

b. Project No.: 11080–003.

c. Date filed: April 29, 1994.

d. Applicant: Eagle Crest Energy

Company.

e. Name of Project: Eagle Mountain.
7956 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 28 / Friday, February 10, 1995 / Notices

f. Location: On lands administered by

the Bureau of Land Management in

Riverside County, California. Township

4 S Range 14 E.

g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power

Act 16 USC §§ 791(a)–825(r).

h. Applicant Contact: Mr. Art Lowe,

Eagle Crest Energy Company, 19800

Macarthur Blvd., Irvine, CA 92715,

(714) 222–2820.

i. FERC Contact: Michael Spencer at

(202) 219–2846.

j. Deadline Date for Protests and

Interventions: April 14, 1995.

k. Status of Environmental Analysis:

This application is not ready for

environmental analysis at this time—see

attached paragraph D7.

l. Description of Project: The

proposed pump storage project would

consist of: (1) an upper storage reservoir

formed behind two embankments, one a

77-foot-high dam and the other a 27-

foot-high dam, with a maximum surface

area of 157 acres, a total reservoir

capacity of 14,200 acre-feet, and a

maximum surface elevation of 2,446 feet

msl; (2) a 29-foot-diameter, 5,700-footlong tunnel, joining a 33-foot-diameter,

1,500-foot-long tunnel; (3) a

powerhouse/pump station containing 3

motor/generator and pump/turbine

units with a total installed capacity of

1,000 MW and producing an estimated

average annual generation of 1,752 Gwh;

(4) a 29-foot-diameter, 7,200-foot-long

tailrace tunnel; (5) a lower storage

reservoir formed within the east pit of

the Eagle Mountain Mine, with a

maximum surface area of 107 acres, a

total reservoir capacity of 15,700 acrefeet, and a maximum surface elevation

of 1,044 feet msl; (6) an 83-mile-long,

500–Kv transmission line

interconnecting with the existing area

transmission system; and (7)

appurtenant facilities. Water for the

project would be supplied by three

wells using a 12-inch-diameter pipeline.

The cost of the project is estimated at

$691,000,000.

m. Purpose of Project: Project power

would be sold.

n. This notice also consists of the

following standard paragraphs: A2, A9,

B1, D7.

6 a. Type of Application: Amendment

of License.

b. Project No: 10551–045.

c. Date Filed: 12/15/94.

d. Applicant: City of Oswego.

e. Name of Project: High Dam Project.

f. Location: On the Oswego River, in

Oswego County, New York.

g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power

Act, 16 U.S.C. § 791(a)–825(r).

h. Applicant Contact: Paul Nolan, Esq.

5515 North 17th Street, Arlington, VA

22205, (703) 534–5509.

i. FERC Contact: Mohamad Fayyad,

(202) 219–2665.

j. Comment Date: March 23, 1995.

k. Description of Amendment:

Licensee proposes to install a new 100

cfs, 150–Kw unit within an existing bay

adjacent to the powerhouse. The new

unit would use flow releases required

by the license for attraction of fish into

the project’s fish passage facility. At the

intake, licensee proposes a trashrack

using 1⁄4-inch thick wedge-bar with 1⁄2-

inch clear spacing on the upstream face.

l. This notice also consists of the

following standard paragraphs: B, C1,

and D2.

Standard Paragraphs

A2. Development Application—Any

qualified applicant desiring to file a

competing application must submit to

the Commission, on or before the

specified deadline date for the

particular application, a competing

development application, or a notice of

intent to file such an application.

Submission of a timely notice of intent

allows an interested person to file the

competing development application no

later than 120 days after the specified

deadline date for the particular

application. Applications for

preliminary permits will not be

accepted in response to this notice.

A5. Preliminary Permit—Anyone

desiring to file a competing application

for preliminary permit for a proposed

project must submit the competing

application itself, or a notice of intent to

file such an application, to the

Commission on or before the specified

comment date for the particular

application (see 18 CFR 4.36).

Submission of a timely notice of intent

allows an interested person to file the

competing preliminary permit

application no later than 30 days after

the specified comment date for the

particular application. A competing

preliminary permit application must

conform with 18 CFR 4.30(b)(1) and (9)

and 4.36.

A7. Preliminary Permit—Any

qualified development applicant

desiring to file a competing

development application must submit to

the Commission, on or before a

specified comment date for the

particular application, either a

competing development application or a

notice of intent to file such an

application. Submission of a timely

notice of intent to file a development

application allows an interested person

to file the competing application no

later than 120 days after the specified

comment date for the particular

application. A competing license

application must conform with 18 CFR

4.30 (b)(1) and (9) and 4.36.

A9. Notice of intent—A notice of

intent must specify the exact name,

business address, and telephone number

of the prospective applicant, and must

include an unequivocal statement of

intent to submit, if such an application

may be filed, either a preliminary

permit application or a development

application (specify which type of

application). A notice of intent must be

served on the applicant(s) named in this

public notice.

A10. Proposed Scope of Studies under

Permit—A preliminary permit, if issued,

does not authorize construction. The

term of the proposed preliminary permit

with be 36 months. The work proposed

under the preliminary permit would

include economic analysis, preparation

of preliminary engineering plans, and a

study of environmental impacts. Based

on the results of these studies, the

Applicant would decide whether to

proceed with the preparation of a

development application to construct

and operate the project.

B. Comments, Protests, or Motions to

Intervene—Anyone may submit

comments, a protest, or a motion to

intervene in accordance with the

requirements of Rules of Practice and

Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211, .214.

In determining the appropriate action to

take, the Commission will consider all

protests or other comments filed, but

only those who file aa motion to

intervene in accordance with the

Commission’s Rules may become a

party to the proceeding. Any comments,

protests, or motions to intervene must

be received on or before the specified

comment date for the particular

application.

B1. Protests or Motions to Intervene—

Anyone may submit a protest or a

motion to intervene in accordance with

the requirements of Rules of Practice

and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210,

385.211, and 385.214. In determining

the appropriate action to take, the

Commission will consider all protests

filed, but only those who file a motion

to intervene in accordance with the

Commission’s Rules may become a

party to the proceeding. Any protests or

motions to intervene must be received

on or before the specified deadline date

for the particular application.

C. Filing and Service of Responsive

Documents—Any filings must bear in

all capital letters the title

‘‘COMMENTS’’, ‘‘NOTICE OF INTENT

TO FILE COMPETING APPLICATION’,

‘‘COMPETING APPLICATION’’,

‘‘PROTEST’’, ‘‘MOTION TO

INTERVENE’’, as applicable, and the

Project Number of the particular
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 28 / Friday, February 10, 1995 / Notices 7957

application to which the filing refers.

Any of the above-named documents

must be filed by providing the original

and the number of copies provided by

the Commission’s regulations to: The

Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission, 825 North Capitol Street,

N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426. An

additional copy must be sent to

Director, Division of Project Review,

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

Room 1027, at the above-mentioned

address. A copy of any notice of intent,

competing application or motion to

intervene must also be served upon each

representative of the Applicant

specified in the particular application.

C1. Filing and Service of Responsive

Documents—Any filings must bear in

all capital letters the title

‘‘COMMENTS’’,

‘‘RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TERMS

AND CONDITIONS’’, ‘‘PROTEST’’, OR

‘‘MOTION TO INTERVENE’’, as

applicable, and the Project Number of

the particular application to which the

filing refers. Any of the above-named

documents must be filed by providing

the original and the number of copies

provided by the Commission’s

regulations to: The Secretary, Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 825

North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington,

D.C. 20426. A copy of any motion to

intervene must also be served upon each

representative of the Applicant

specified in the particular application.

D2. Agency Comments—Federal,

state, and local agencies are invited to

file comments on the described

application. A copy of the application

may be obtained by agencies directly

from the Applicant. If an agency does

not file comments within the time

specified for filing comments, it will be

presumed to have no comments. One

copy of an agency’s must also be sent to

the Applicant’s representatives.

D7. Filing and Service of Responsive

Documents—The application is not

ready for environmental analysis at this

time; therefore, the Commission is not

now requesting comments,

recommendations, terms and

conditions, or prescriptions.

When the application is ready for

environmental analysis, the

Commission will issue a public notice

requesting comments,

recommendations, terms and

conditions, or prescriptions.

All filings must (1) bear in all capital

letters the title ‘‘PROTEST’’ or

‘‘MOTION TO INTERVENE,’’ ‘‘NOTICE

OF INTENT TO FILE COMPETING

APPLICATION,’’ or ‘‘COMPETING

APPLICATION;’’ (2) set forth in the

heading the name of the applicant and

the project number of the application to

which the filing responds; (3) furnish

the name, address, and telephone

number of the person protesting or

intervening; and (4) otherwise comply

with the requirements of 18 CFR

385.2001 through 385.2005. Any of

these documents must be filed by

providing the original and the number

of copies required by the Commission’s

regulations to: The Secretary, Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 825

North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington,

D.C. 20426. An additional copy must be

sent to Director, Division of Project

Review, Office of Hydropower

Licensing, Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission, Room 1027, at the above

address. A copy of any protest or motion

to intervene must be served upon each

representative of the applicant specified

in the particular application.

Dated: February 2, 1995, Washington, DC.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–3316 Filed 2–9–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Docket No. CP95–181–000, et al.]

Columbia Gas Transmission

Corporation, et al.; Natural Gas

Certificate Filings

February 2, 1995.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Columbia Gas Transmission

Corporation

[Docket No. CP95–181–000]

Take notice that on January 27, 1995,

Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation

(Columbia), 1700 MacCorkle Avenue,

S.E., Charleston, West Virginia 25314,

filed an application with the

Commission in Docket No. CP95–181–

000 pursuant to Section 7(b) of the

Natural Gas Act (NGA) for authorization

to abandon approximately 15.7 miles of

deteriorating pipeline facilities and for

authorization pursuant to Section 7(c) of

the NGA to construct and operate

approximately 10.9 miles of storage

pipelines and appurtenant facilities

(which would replace the abandoned

facilities) at the Coco ‘‘A’’ Storage Field

in Kanawha County, West Virginia, all

as more fully set forth in the application

which is open to the public for

inspection.

Columbia proposes to abandon

approximately 0.2 mile of 16-inch

diameter pipe, 0.8 mile of 14-inch

diameter pipe, 2.8 miles of 10-inch

diameter pipe, 2.3 miles of 8-inch

diameter pipe, 3.4 miles of 6-inch

diameter pipe, and 6.2 miles of 4-inch

pipe within the Coco ‘‘A’’ Storage Field.

Columbia proposes to replace its

abandoned facilities by constructing and

operating 3.1 miles of 20-inch diameter

pipe, 1.4 miles of 10-inch diameter pipe,

0.9 mile of 8-inch diameter pipe, 2.9

miles of 6-inch diameter pipe, and 2.7

miles of 4-inch pipe within the Coco

‘‘A’’ Storage Field. Columbia states that

it would cost approximately

$11,937,000 to construct the proposed

replacement facilities.

Columbia states that it does not

request authorization for any new or

additional service. Columbia also states

that the pipeline segments to be

replaced have become physically

deteriorated to the extent that

replacement would be advisable.

Comment date: February 23, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph F

at the end of this notice.

2. East Tennessee Natural Gas

Company

[Docket No. CP95–182–000]

Take notice that on January 30, 1995,

East Tennessee Natural Gas Company

(East Tennessee), P.O. Box 2511,

Houston, Texas 77252, filed in Docket

No. CP95–182–000 a request pursuant to

§§ 157.205 and 157.212 of the

Commission’s Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205,

157.212) for authorization to establish a

new delivery point for its firm

transportation customer, Loudon

Utilities Gas Department (Loudon)

under East Tennessee’s blanket

certificate issued in Docket No. CP82–

412–000 pursuant to Section 7 of the

Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set

forth in the request that is on file with

the Commission and open to public

inspection.

East Tennessee proposes to establish

a new delivery point at M.P. 3218D–

101+7.39 in Loudon County, Tennessee

as requested by Loudon. East Tennessee

will install, own, operate, and maintain

a 3-inch hot tap assembly and

interconnecting pipe on its existing

right-of-way. Further, East Tennessee

will install, own, operate, and maintain

a meter station and DAC equipment on

a site provided by Loudon adjacent to

East Tennessee’s right-of-way.

Comment date: March 20, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph G

at the end of this notice.

3. Florida Gas Transmission Company

[Docket No. CP95–183–000]

Take notice that on January 30, 1995,

Florida Gas Transmission company

(FGT), 1400 Smith Street, P.O. Box

1188, Houston, Texas 77251–1188, filed

in Docket No. CP95–183–000 a request

pursuant to §§ 157.205 and 157.212 of