alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,027
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,904
<ALLOWANCES>                                       147
<INVENTORY>                                      3,827
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,378
<PP&E>                                           3,471
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,663
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,146
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,929
<BONDS>                                            796
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           135
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,286
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,146
<SALES>                                         18,548
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,548
<CGS>                                           10,996
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,394
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (17)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    13
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 385
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,154
<INCOME-TAX>                                        80
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,074
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    472
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,546
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Stephen J. Lifshatz, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Lionbridge Technologies, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SECtransition instructions contained in SEC Release No. 34-47986]; 

 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 

 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 7, 2004
Exhibit 10.2


Amendment #4 to

Promissory Note


 


This
AMENDMENT (this “AMENDMENT”) is entered into by and between Company and Holder (each as defined below), effective as
of December 30, 2022 (the “Effective Date”), binding on the undersigned parties as of that date. 


 


Odyssey Group International,
Inc. (“BORROWER”) and ____________ (“LENDER”) entered into that certain Promissory Note (the “Note”)
dated December 21, 2021, as amended April 20, 2022, June 3, 2022 and September 30, 2022 in the amount of $25,000.00 (the “Loan
Amount”). Capitalized terms not otherwise defined have the meaning set forth in the Note.


 


Whereas,
the parties have agreed to extend the maturity date of the Note subject to the conditions contained herein.


 


AGREEMENT


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency
of which are hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


		1.	Extension of Maturity Date. The Maturity Date of the Note is amended and extended to March
31, 2022.



 


		2.	Effectiveness; Conflict. Except as modified hereby, the Note and terms thereof shall remain
in full force and effect. On and after the effectiveness of this Amendment, each reference in the Notes to “this Agreement,”
“hereunder,” “hereof,” “herein” or words of like import shall mean and be a reference to the Note,
as amended by this Amendment. To the extent the terms of this Amendment conflict with any provision of the Note or any of the documents
referenced therein, then the provisions of this Amendment shall control.



 


		3.	Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed by facsimile transmission and in counterparts,
each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same agreement.



 


		4.	All Other Terms. All other terms and conditions of the Note remain unchanged and in full
force and effect.



 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and acknowledging acceptance
and agreement of the foregoing, BORROWER, and LENDER affix their signatures hereto,


 





	Odyssey Group International, Inc.	 	Holder
	 	 	 
	/s/ J. Michael Redmond                          	 	/s/ Holder                                   
	By: J. Michael Redmond	 	By: Holder
	Title: President	 	An Individual
	Dated: December 30, 2022	 	Dated: December 30, 2022
exhibit10a.htm
















Exhibit 10(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 13 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-141756) pertaining to Lincoln Life & Annuity Variable Annuity Account H, which is incorporated by reference into Post-Effective Amendment No. 14, and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2011, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) April 6, 2011, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Variable Annuity Account H.


 


                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP




Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


June 20, 2011
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with thequarterly report of bebe stores, inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended January 5, 2008, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gregory Scott, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,based on my knowledge:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a)  or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: February 14, 2008 | /s/ Gregory Scott       |   |
|-------------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                          | Gregory Scott           |
|                          | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
#### THE FEDERAL LAND BANK OF COLUMBIA v. ANNIE A. KORNER et al.

(Filed 12 April, 1933.)

Appeal by certain of tbe defendants from *Sink, J.,*at February Term, 1933, of Eoesyth.

Affirmed.

Tbis is an action for judgment on a note and for tbe foreclosure of a mortgage executed by tbe defendants to secure tbe payment of tbe note.

After judgment by default on tbe note rendered by tbe clerk of tbe Superior Court, it was ordered and decreed that tbe land described in tbe mortgage be sold to satisfy tbe judgment. Tbe land was sold by a commissioner appointed by tbe court for that purpose. Upon tbe report of tbe sale, tbe same was confirmed by tbe clerk of tbe Superior Court.

Tbe action was thereafter beard by tbe clerk on tbe motion of certain defendants that tbe order of confirmation, tbe -decree of sale, and the *792judgment be set aside and vacated upon the grounds stated in tbe motion which was in writing. The motion was denied, and the defendants appealed to the judge of the Superior Court of Forsyth County.

From judgment affirming the order of the clerk, the defendants appealed to the Supreme Court.

*Ingle & Ruclcer for plaintiff.*

*Charles T. Ross for defendants.*

Per Cueiam.

The facts found by the judge and set out in the judgment, are sufficient to support the judgment affirming the order of the clerk. Conceding without deciding that there were irregularities appearing on the record, they are not sufficient to entitle the defendants to the relief sought by their motion as a matter of law. The judgment is

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-4049

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
SANDRA BANKS THOMPSON, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CR-03-454) Submitted: April 20, 2005 Decided: May 3, 2005 Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marilyn Gerk Ozer, MASSENGALE & OZER, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, for Appellant. Anna Mills Wagoner, United States Attorney, Sandra Jane Hairston, Lawrence Patrick Auld, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).1 Thompson also moves for severance from her codefendants. We previously granted this motion by separate order. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Sandra Banks Thompson, indicted with several codefendants, pled guilty on February 3, 2004, to conspiracy to commit loan, mail, wire, and bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 (2000). On December 28, 2004, the district court sentenced Thompson, over her objection based on Blakely v. Washington , 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), to twenty-six months of imprisonment to be followed by three years of supervised release. The district court also specified an alternative sentence of probation pursuant to this court’s recommendation in United States v. Hammoud , 378 F.3d 426 (4th Cir. 2004) (order), opinion issued by381 F.3d 316 (4th Cir. 2004) (en banc), vacated , 125 S. Ct. 1051 (2005). Thompson appealed, challenging her sentence under Blakely . On January 12, 2005, the Supreme Court in United States v. Booker , 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005), applied the reasoning in Blakelyto the federal sentencing guidelines. Thompson now moves for an expedited remand of her case to the district court to allow implementation of the alternative sentence previously announced by the district court. 1 The Government opposes both motions; those of Thompson’s codefendants who have responded to the motions have no objection.2 We decline Thompson’s request to direct the district court to implement the alternative sentence previously announced. - 3 - We conclude that Thompson is entitled to be resentenced under Booker , as the Government concedes. As Thompson raises no other issues on appeal, we affirm her conviction and vacate the sentence i mposed by the district court. We grant the motion for remand, having expedited its consideration to the extent practicable given the court’s docket. 2 On remand, the district court shall reconsider Thompson’s sentence in light of Booker . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART , VACATED IN PART, AND REMANDED
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                  
<ARTICLE>               7       
<CIK>                   0000881453  
<NAME>                  ASLAC1298
<MULTIPLIER>            1,000
<CURRENCY>              U.S Dollars
                                                                     
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                       JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     141,195
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                    149,484
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                      149,575
<EQUITIES>                                 8,210
<MORTGAGE>                                     0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                           158,263
<CASH>                                    77,525
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                         4,191
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                   721,507
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        18,848,273 <F1>
<POLICY-LOSSES>                           63,053
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                          203,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                   2,000
<OTHER-SE>                               248,417
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          18,848,273 <F2>
<PREMIUMS>                                   874
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                       11,130
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                            99
<OTHER-INCOME>                           237,437 <F3>
<BENEFITS>                                (2,175)
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>               86,628
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                      81,162
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           42,921
<INCOME-TAX>                               8,154
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                              34,767
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        0
<FN>
<F1> Included in Total Assets are Assets Held in Separate Accounts of 
     $17,835,400.
<F2> Included in Total Liabilities and Equity are Liabilities Related to 
     Separate Accounts of $17,835,400.
<F3> Other income includes annuity charges and fees of $186,211 and fee 
     income of $50,839.
</FN>

                                                                 


</TABLE>
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00088

- CR

Jamario Bernard Pickett

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From Criminal District Court No. 4

o f Tarrant County (1328362D )

April 3, 2014

P er C uriam

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the a ppeal is dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                            5
<MULTIPLIER>                     1,000
       
<S>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                      SEP-01-1996
<CASH>                              248
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                     1,431
<ALLOWANCES>                          0
<INVENTORY>                       1,067
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  2,787
<PP&E>                            4,351
<DEPRECIATION>                        0                    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    7,462
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             9,704
<BONDS>                           1,679    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<COMMON>                            115
<OTHER-SE>                       (4,036)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      7,462
<SALES>                          28,666
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 28,666
<CGS>                            19,082
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    19,082
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 20,600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  843
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (11,852)
<INCOME-TAX>                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (11,852)
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                    (11,852)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         (.22) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (.22)
        

</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 129346 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, RICHARD ARRAND a nd LINDA ARRAND, Justices Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 129346 COA: 260386 Lenawee CC: 04-001671-NH DR. ALAN SNIDER, D.O., HERRICK MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, PROMEDICA HEALTH SYSTEM , and LENAWEE HEALTH ALLIANCE, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the Ju ly 14, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d0123 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 30, 2006

Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 28, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 10843]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4813]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-120-000]


NorAm Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Change in Date of 
Technical Conference

February 22, 1995.
    Take notice that the technical conference originally scheduled to 
be held on Tuesday, February 28, 1995, at 10:00 a.m., will now be held 
on Thursday, March 9, 1995, at 10:00 a.m., in a room to be designated 
at the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 810 First 
Street, N.E., Washington D.C. 20426. All interested parties and Staff 
are permitted to attend.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-4813 Filed 2-27-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 99.2

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Forever Enterprises, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 (the
"Report"), I, Michael R. Butler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

          (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                   section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                   of 1934; and

          (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly
                   presents, in all material respects, the financial
                   condition and results of operations of the Company.


                          /s/ Michael R. Butler
                          ----------------------------------------------------
                          Chief Financial Officer of Forever Enterprises, Inc.
                          November 14, 2002


     This certificate accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,

AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the quarterly report of bebe stores, inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended October 6, 2007, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, WalterParks, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

 

(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a)  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: November 15, 2007 | /s/ Walter Parks            |   |
|--------------------------|-----------------------------|--------|
|                     | Walter Parks                |
|                     | Chief Operating Officer and |
|                     | Chief Financial Officer     |

 

----