alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32




SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO\


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Online Vacation Center Holdings Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward B. Rudner, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date: November 11, 2010






/s/ Edward B. Rudner


Edward B. Rudner


Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer






Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing).
#### STATE v. DR. P. H. LEE.

(Filed 30 April, 1958.)

1. Abortion § 3—

Conflicting evidence in tliis prosecution for violation of G.S. 14-45 *held*sufficient to be submitted to the jury.

2. Criminal Law § 107—

Where corroborative evidence is properly restricted upon its admission, the failure of the court in its charge to explain the difference between substantive evidence and corroborative evidence will not be held for error in the absence of special request.

3. Criminal Law § 106—

Failure of the court to define “reasonable doubt” will not be held for error in the absence of special request.

Appeal by defendant from *Rousseau, J.,*October 1957 Term of CabaRRus.

*Attorney General Patton, Assistant Attorney General Love, and R. T. Sanders of staff for the State.*

*Llewellyn and McKenzie for defendant, appellant.*

Per Curiam.

Defendant was indicted on a charge of attempting to produce an abortion by Joan Porter in violation of G.S. 14-45. Mrs. Porter testified that she employed defendant and paid him $35 to cause her to abort. She was then four or five months pregnant. Her description of what defendant did is sufficient to constitute the crime of which defendant was charged.

Defendant admitted he was employed and treated Mrs. Porter. He denied the employment was for the purpose charged, testifying he did not discover his patient was pregnant, and that the treatment given was to correct the position of her womb and not to produce an abortion.

The conflict in testimony between patient and physician was for the jury. The motion to nonsuit was properly overruled. It is not argued in the brief and is abandoned. Rule 28, 221 N.C. 563.

*328A police officer testified to statements made to him by Mrs. Porter which detailed her employment of defendant, the purpose of the employment and the treatment given. The court admitted this evidence, telling the jury at the time the evidence was admitted that it was offered for the purpose of corroboration and was not substantive evidence. The court did not, in its charge, explain the difference between substantive evidence and corroborative evidence. Defendant made no request for such an instruction. The failure to make reference in the charge to the difference between substantive evidence and corroborative evidence and to define each of these terms is not ground for exception. Rule 21, 221 N.C. 558; *S .v. McKinnon,*223 N.C. 160, 25 S.E. 2d 606; *S. v. Johnson,*218 N.C. 604, 12 S.E. 2d 278.

No request was made to define the term “reasonable doubt.” The failure to define the words “reasonable” and “doubt” does no violence to G.S. 1-180. S. *v. Hammonds,*241 N.C. 226, 85 S.E. 2d 133; *S. v. Ammons,*204 N.C. 753, 169 S.E. 631; *S. v. Steadman,*200 N.C. 768, 158 S.E. 478.

The charge of the court fairly presented the question at issue to the jury. Our examination of the record and the assignments of error fails to disclose any error in the trial prejudicial to defendant.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

Genaera Corporation:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 33-52882, 33-71984, 333-10889, 333-62073, 333-69824 and 333-121163) on Form S-8 and registration statements (Nos. 333-106678, 333-73798 and 333-121577) on Form S-3 of
Genaera Corporation (formerly Magainin Pharmaceuticals Inc.) of our reports dated March 6, 2006, with respect to the balance sheets of Genaera Corporation as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related statements of operations, changes
in stockholders equity and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2005 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, which reports appear in the December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of Genaera Corporation.



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|/s/ KPMG LLP                            
|                                        
|Philadelphia, Pennsylvania March 6, 2006
### Proposed Provision: D2. The current spouse benefit is based on 50 percent of the PIA of the other spouse. Reduce this percent each year by 1 percentage point beginning with newly eligible spouses in 2024, until the percent reaches 33 in 2040.

back
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ENGINEERS





As independent oil and gas consultants, Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc. hereby consents to the use of our report entitled “Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. in Certain Domestic Oil and Gas Reserves and to the Interests of Warrior Gas Company in the Gataga Gas Unit No. 5A, Vermejo (Ellenburger) Field, Loving County, Texas Effective December 31, 2009, for Disclosure to the Securities and Exchange Commission, Williamson Project 9.9376” dated February 15, 2010 and data extracted therefrom (and all references to our Firm) included in or made a part of this Form 10-K Annual Report to be filed on or about March 12, 2010 and to the incorporation by reference of this Form 10-K Annual Report (including the use of our report and references to our Firm herein) into that certain Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed by Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission, file number 333-116825, and those certain Registration Statements on Form S-8 filed by Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission, file numbers 33-68320, 33-68316, 33-69688, and 33-92834 covering the Bonus Incentive Plan of Clayton Williams Energy, Inc., Outside Directors Stock Option Plan of Clayton Williams Energy, Inc., Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. 401(k) Plan & Trust, and the Executive Incentive Stock Compensation Plan of Clayton Williams Energy, Inc., respectively.
 
 
 
 
 
 WILLIAMSON PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS, INC.
 
 Midland, Texas
 March 10, 2010
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3581 

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to submit to Congress 

a report on COVID–19 natural immunity, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2022 

Mr. BRAUN (for himself and Mr. LANKFORD) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to 

submit to Congress a report on COVID–19 natural immunity, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Natural Immunity 

5 Transparency Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPORT ON COVID–19 NATURAL IMMUNITY. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the 

8 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Health and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3581 IS

1 Human Services shall submit to Congress a report that 

2 contains— 

3 (1) the number of individuals who recovered 

4 from a COVID–19 infection, and never received a 

5 COVID–19 vaccine, during the period beginning on 

6 January 1, 2020, and ending on such date of enact7 ment, and who subsequently— 

8 (A) died from a COVID–19 infection; 

9 (B) were hospitalized from a COVID–19 

10 infection; 

11 (C) had an additional confirmed case of 

12 COVID–19; or 

13 (D) transmitted SARS–CoV–2 to another 

14 person or persons while reinfected; and 

15 (2) the number of individuals who received all 

16 recommended doses of a COVID–19 vaccine during 

17 the period beginning on December 14, 2020, and 

18 ending on such date of enactment, and who subse19 quently— 

20 (A) died from a COVID–19 infection; 

21 (B) were hospitalized from a COVID–19 

22 infection; or 

23 (C) had a confirmed breakthrough case. 

24 (b) DEFINITIONS.— In this section: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3581 IS

1 (1) BREAKTHROUGH CASE.—The term ‘‘break2 through case’’, with respect to a case of COVID–19, 

3 means the detection of SARS–CoV–2 RNA or anti4 gen in a respiratory specimen collected from an indi5 vidual at least 14 days after the date on which such 

6 individual received all recommended doses of a 

7 COVID–19 vaccine. 

8 (2) COVID–19 VACCINE.—The term ‘‘COVID– 

9 19 vaccine’’ means a vaccine for COVID–19 that 

10 has been licensed under section 351 of the Public 

11 Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262) or authorized 

12 for emergency use under section 564 of the Federal 

13 Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360bbb– 

14 3). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
| Subsidiary                        |   | Jurisdiction               |
|-----------------------------------|--------|----------------------------|
|                              |   |                       |
| CoaLogix Inc.                     |   | Delaware                   |
|                              |   |                       |
| CoaLogix Tech LLC                 |   | Delaware                   |
|                              |   |                       |
| CoaLogix Technology Holdings Inc. |   | Delaware                   |
|                              |   |                       |
| CoaLogix Solutions Inc.           |   | Delaware                   |
|                              |   |                       |
| SCR-Tech, LLC                     |   | North Carolina             |
|                              |   |                       |
| DSIT Solutions Ltd.               |   | Israel                     |
|                              |   |                       |
| Glen & Valley Systems Ltd.    |   | Israel                     |
|                              |   |                       |
| DSIT Sonar and Acoustics Ltd.     |   | Israel                     |
|                              |   |                       |
| GridSense Pty. Ltd.               |   | New South Wales, Australia |
|                              |   |                       |
| GridSense Inc.                    |   | Colorado                   |
|                              |   |                       |
| US Sensor Systems Inc.            |   | Delaware                   |

----
Exhibit
31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Timothy P. Bacci,
certify that:

|1. |  | I have reviewed this
      annual report on Form 10-K/A of Daegis Inc. (registrant);                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | Based on my
      knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
      made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
      not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
  report;
|  

|Date: | August 28, 2015 |                        
|----- | --------------- | -----------------------
|     
|      |                 | /s/ TIMOTHYP. BACCI    
|      |                 | Timothy P. Bacci       
|      |                 | Chief Executive Officer



---
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Office of the Chief Actuary | The 2006 OASDI Trustees ReportMay 1, 2006   Historical document   |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map | Need Larger Text? |
----

**Exhibit      32.1**

**SECTION      1350 CERTIFICATION**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                             | /s/                H. N. Padget, Jr.                      |
|----------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|                             | H.                N. Padget, Jr., President and CEO       |
|                             | (principal                executive officer)              |
|                             |                                                      |
|                             |                                                      |
|                             |                                                      |
|                             | /s/                William R. Blanton                     |
|                             | William                R. Blanton, Vice Chairman, COO/CFO |
|                             | (principal                financial officer)              |
| November                10, 2005 |                                                      |
Not for Publication in West's Federal Reporter

United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 10-1165

UNITED STATES,

Appellee,

v.

ESTEBAN RIVERA-LEBRON, a/k/a Junito,

Defendant, Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

[Hon. Carmen Consuelo Cerezo, U.S. District Judge]

Before

Boudin, Howard and Thompson,

Circuit Judges.

Esteban Rivera-Lebron on brief pro se.

Nelson Pérez-Sosa, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Julia M.

Meconiates, Assistant U.S. Attorney,and Rosa Emilia RodriguezVelez, United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.

February 28, 2011
-2-

Per Curiam. After a thorough review of the record and of

the parties' submissions, we affirm. Appellant Esteban RiveraLebron ("Rivera") has waived his right to appeal the denial of his

motion for a writ of audita querela because he failed to file an

objection to the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation. See

United States v. Lugo Guerrero, 524 F.3d 5, 14 (1st Cir. 2008).

That Report and Recommendation properly advised Rivera that a

failure to object would amount to a waiver. See United States v.

Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986).

Furthermore, we see no plain error that would cause us to

overlook the waiver. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 155 (1985).

"The armamentarium of common-law writs [is] available only to fill

whatever interstices exist in the post-conviction remedial scheme

made available to federal prisoners by way of [28 U.S.C. §] 2255."

Trenkler v. United States, 536 F.3d 85, 97 (1st Cir. 2008). Where

a prisoner has filed a motion for relief under one of the common

law writs, the court must examine the substance of the motion to

determine whether the claim is one that would be cognizable under

section 2255. If so, the motion must satisfy the gate-keeping

provisions of section 2255(h) in order for the motion to proceed.

Id.

Rivera's motion clearly falls within the purview of

section 2255, as he challenges the validity of his sentence under

United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). The motion fails to
-3-

meet the gate-keeping requirements of section 2255. Rivera has

already filed a first section 2255 motion, so the instant filing

was, in essence, a second or successive section 2255 motion, and

Rivera failed to request permission first from this court to

proceed with his second or successive motion as required by 28

U.S.C. § 2255(h). Even if he had done so, the request would have

been denied because the motion does not rely upon a new rule of

constitutional law made retroactive to cases on collateral review

by the Supreme Court or upon newly discovered evidence. See 28

U.S.C. § 2255(h)(1) & (2).

Affirmed. See 1st Cir. R. 27.0(c).
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 235 (Thursday, December 7, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 62840]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-29801]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. GT96-35-000]


Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company; Notice of Filing

December 1, 1995.
    Take notice that on November 22, 1995, Williston Basin Interstate 
Pipeline Company (Williston Basin), tendered for filing as part of its 
FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised 
tariff sheets to become effective November 22, 1995:

Ninth Revised Sheet No. 827
Eighth Revised Sheet No. 828
Tenth Revised Sheet No. 829
Eleventh Revised Sheet No. 830
Tenth Revised Sheet No. 831
Twelfth Revised Sheet No. 832
Thirteenth Revised Sheet No. 833

    Williston Basin states that the revised tariff sheets are being 
filed simply to update its Master Delivery Point List.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Secs. 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. Pursuant to Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations, all such motions or protests must be filed not later than 
12 days after the date of the filing noted above. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-29801 Filed 12-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Thomas F. Prisby, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of CFS Bancorp, Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)           The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
              period ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with
              the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
              Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m (a) or 78o(d)) and

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.


Date:    November 13, 2003                  By: /s/ Thomas F. Prisby
                                               ---------------------------------
                                                Thomas F. Prisby, Chairman and
                                                Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 901 has been
provided to CFS Bancorp, Inc., will be retained by CFS Bancorp, Inc., and will
be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.