alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 27 (Thursday, February 9, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 7820]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3424]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


``FEDERAL REGISTER'' NUMBER: 95-2739.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED DATA AND TIME: Thursday, February 9, 1995 at 10: 
00 a.m. Meeting Open to the Public.

THE FOLLOWING ITEM WAS ADDED TO THE AGENDA:

    Implementation of Computer Upgrade (continued from meeting of 
February 2, 1995).

DATE AND TIME: Thursday, February 14, 1995 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.

STATUS: This Meeting Will Be Closed to the Public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. Sec. 437g.
Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. Sec. 437g. Sec. 438(b), and 
Title 26, U.S.C.
Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration
Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a 
particular employee

DATE AND TIME: Wednesday, February 15, 1995 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. (Ninth Floor).

STATUS: This Oral Hearing Will Be Open to the Public.

MATTER BEFORE THE COMMISSION:

    Public Hearing on Regulations Governing Publicly Financed 
Presidential Primary and General Election Candidates.

DATE AND TIME: Thursday, February 16, 1995 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. (Ninth Floor).

STATUS: This Meeting Will Be Open to the Public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

Correction and Approval of Minutes
Advisory Opinion 1995-03: Don White on behalf of the Gramm '96 
Committee
Administrative Matters

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Mr. Ron Harris, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 219-4155.
Delores Hardy.
Administrative Assistant.
[FR Doc. 95-3424 Filed 2-7-95; 2:31 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 28 (Friday, February 10, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 7931]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3462]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Chapter I
[FRL-5153-2]


Notice and Open Meeting of the Negotiated Rulemaking Advisory 
Committee for Small Nonroad Engine Regulations
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: FACA Committee Meeting--Negotiated Rulemaking on Small Nonroad 
Engine Regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As required by section 9(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), EPA is giving notice of the next 
meeting of the Advisory Committee to negotiate a rule to reduce air 
emissions from small nonroad engines. The meeting is open to the public 
without advance registration. The purpose of the meeting is to continue 
identification and discussion of issues, discuss interests of committee 
members, and hear reports from task groups.

DATES: The committee will meet on February 21 and 22, 1995 from 10 a.m. 
to 6 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The location of the meeting will be the Holiday Inn East, 
3750 Washtenaw, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, (313) 971-2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Persons needing further information on 
the technical and substantive matters of the rule should contact Betsy 
McCabe, National Vehicle and Fuel Emissions Laboratory, 2565 Plymouth 
Rd., Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105, (313) 668-4344. Persons needing further 
information on committee procedes should call Deborah Dalton, Consensus 
and Dispute Resolution Program, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M 
Street, S.W. Washington, DC 20460, (202) 260-5495, or the Committee's 
facilitator, Lucy Moore or John Folk-Williams, Western Network, 616 Don 
Gaspar, Santa Fe, New Mexico, 87501, (505) 982-9805.

    Dated: February 6, 1995.
Chris Kirtz,
Acting Designated Federal Official, Deputy Director, Consensus and 
Dispute Resolution Program.
[FR Doc. 95-3462 Filed 2-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND IN
THE COMPANY'S 10-K FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      21,661,671
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,545,264
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (300,995)
<INVENTORY>                                  7,705,470
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            40,299,253
<PP&E>                                       4,729,259
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,247,408
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              61,165,014
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,022,075
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    43,889,754
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,436,934
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                61,165,014
<SALES>                                     52,814,568
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            52,814,568
<CGS>                                       24,910,271
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               52,060,321
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               223,004
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             508,677
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                768,685
<INCOME-TAX>                                   307,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            768,685
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   461,685
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ALFRED C. CARRERA, II,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 708 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of April, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Retirement Age | Description of Proposed Provision:      Index benefits to longevity after the normal retirement age (NRA) reaches age 67 under current law. Under current law, the NRA reaches 67 for individuals who attain age 62 in 2022 and later. Under this provision, the NRA would be further increased by one month for those attaining age 62 in every other year after 2022. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2009 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified November 16, 2009 |
##### 



Exhibit 10.4
 US $200,000
    
    March 31, 2006
 GUARANTEED
PROMISSORY NOTE
 Maker Holder
 Interest
 Payments Maturity Date
 Prepayment
 Guaranty Guaranty Guarantors Guaranteed
Obligations




---



##### 



Default Event of
Default
     Collection Costs
 Waiver
 Usury
  Transfer
 2




---



##### 



Governing Law
 Representations and Warranties of Maker
    Representations and Warranties of Guarantors
      Maker:
    
    REMOTE KNOWLEDGE, INC.,a Delaware CorporationBy:
    
    /s/ Randy BayneName: Randy BayneTitle: President and CEO
 3




---



##### 



Guarantors:
    
    ALAN GRANADER/s/ Alan Granader
 STATE OF Michigan
    
    }} ss.COUNTY OF Oakland
    
    }
 28th
 /s/ Marilyn J. HoldenNotary PublicMy Commission Expires:1/29/08 4




---



##### 



DAN GRANADER/s/ Dan Granader
 STATE OF Montana
    
    }} ss.COUNTY OF Missoula
    
    }
 29
 /s/ Percy L. ClineNotary PublicMy Commission Expires: January 30, 2008 HARRY GRANADER/s/ Harry Granader
 STATE OF Michigan
    
    }} ss.COUNTY OF Oakland
    
    }
 28th
 /s/ Marilyn J. HoldenNotary PublicMy Commission Expires: 1/29/08 5
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable) | Description of Proposed Provision:      Increase the payroll tax rate (currently 12.4 percent) to 12.6 percent in 2012, 12.9 percent in 2020, 13.1 in percent in 2030, 13.9 percent in 2040, 13.5 percent in 2050, and 13.3 percent in 2060. |
|-------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                           |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2009 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified January 28, 2010 |
#### HAYDN GUNTER v. J. E. LATHAM COMPANY.

(Filed 11 December, 1935.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *Pless, J.,*at September-October Term, 1935, of Guilfoed.

Affirmed.

This is an action to recover damages for the breach by the defendant of its contract with the plaintiff, by which the defendant agreed that upon the happening of certain contingencies the plaintiff and the defendant should become the owners of certain properties purchased by the plaintiff for the defendant, the plaintiff to own ten per cent and the defendant ninety per cent, in value of said properties.

The defendant’s demurrer *ore terms*to the complaint for that the facts stated therein were not sufficient to constitute a cause of action was sustained, and the plaintiff appealed to the Supreme Court.

*Younce & Younce for plaintiff.*

*Brooks, McLendon •& Eolderness and B. D. Douglass for defendant.*

Pee Cubiak.

In the *absence*of allegations in the complaint showing that defendant had breached its contract with the plaintiff, with respect to the properties described in the contract, the demurrer *ore tenus*was properly sustained.

The order of the defendant that work on one of the properties described in the contract be discontinued, did not constitute a breach of the contract, which is in writing. No facts are alleged in the complaint which show that such order was made arbitrarily, or with intent to injure the plaintiff. The contract expressly provides that work on the properties should be continued or discontinued in the discretion of the defendant, who had advanced all the money for the purchase and operation of the properties.

The judgment is

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1


STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF PREMIERE GLOBAL SERVICES, INC.
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Premiere Global Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Boland T. Jones, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |                                                                                                                    
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Boland T. Jones

      Boland T. Jones

Chief Executive Officer

Premiere Global Services, Inc.

March 14, 2011

---
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 366 

To remove all statues of individuals who voluntarily served the Confederate 

States of America from display in the United States Capitol. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 23, 2021 

Mr. BOOKER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

A BILL 

To remove all statues of individuals who voluntarily served 

the Confederate States of America from display in the 

United States Capitol. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Confederate Monu5 ment Removal Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENTS AND REMOVAL PROCEDURES. 

7 (a) REQUIREMENTS.—Section 1814 of the Revised 

8 Statutes (2 U.S.C. 2131) is amended by inserting ‘‘(other 

9 than persons who served voluntarily with the Confederate 

10 States of America)’’ after ‘‘military services’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 366 IS

1 (b) STATUE REMOVAL PROCEDURES.— 

2 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Architect of the Capitol 

3 shall— 

4 (A) identify all statues on display in the 

5 United States Capitol that do not meet the re6 quirements of section 1814 of the Revised Stat7 utes (2 U.S.C. 2131), as amended by subsection 

8 (a); and 

9 (B) subject to the approval of the Joint 

10 Committee on the Library of Congress, arrange 

11 for the removal of each such statue from the 

12 Capitol by not later than 120 days after the 

13 date of enactment of this Act. 

14 (2) REMOVAL AND RETURN OF STATUES.—In 

15 the case of a statue that is removed under this sub16 section which was provided for display by a State, 

17 the Architect of the Capitol shall arrange to transfer 

18 and deliver the statue and transfer ownership of the 

19 statue to the State if the State so requests and 

20 agrees to pay any costs related to the transportation 

21 of the statue to the State. 

22 (3) REPLACEMENT OF STATUES.—A State that 

23 has a statue removed under this subsection shall be 

24 able to replace such statue in accordance with the 

25 requirements and procedures of section 1814 of the 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 366 IS

1 Revised Statutes (2 U.S.C. 2131) and section 311 of 

2 the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2001 (2 

3 U.S.C. 2132). 

4 (4) AUTHORIZATION AND APPROPRIATIONS.— 

5 (A) IN GENERAL.—There are appropriated 

6 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2021, 

7 out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise 

8 appropriated, $2,000,000 to the Architect of 

9 the Capitol to carry out this section, including 

10 the costs related to the removal, transfer, secu11 rity, storage, and display of the statues de12 scribed in paragraph (1)(A). 

13 (B) AVAILABILITY.—Amounts appro14 priated under subparagraph (A) shall remain 

15 available until expended. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 133945 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 133945 

 COA: 272270 
 Wayne CC: 98-004378-02 

ANTONIO DAVIS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 30, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

d0830 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 10, 2007 

 Clerk
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 21-2446

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Carlos Pacheco

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville

 ____________

 Submitted: November 12, 2021

Filed: November 22, 2021

[Unpublished]

____________

Before COLLOTON, BENTON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Carlos Pacheco appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed after he pled

guilty to visa fraud and perjury. His counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a

1The Honorable Timothy L. Brooks, United States District Judge for the

Western District of Arkansas.
brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the substantive

reasonableness of the sentence.

After careful review, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion

in sentencing Pacheco. See United States v. Brown, 992 F.3d 665, 673 (8th Cir.

2021) (standard of review); see also United States v. Callaway, 762 F.3d 754, 760–61

(8th Cir. 2014) (presuming reasonable sentences within United States Sentencing

Guidelines Manual range ). Further, having independently reviewed the record under

Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. 

Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to withdraw and affirm.

______________________________

-2-
**Exhibit 32.01**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.**

 

**SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

 

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

 

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the GRIC Communications, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for thequarterly period ended September 30, 2003, I, Bharat Davé, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,to the best of my knowledge based on a review of the Report: (1) the Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.

 
| Date:  November 14, 2003 | By:    | /s/ BHARAT  DAVÉ                    |
|------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|
|                               |   | Bharat Davé                         |
|                               |   | President  & Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to GRIC and will be retained by GRIC and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# PHOTOS ANDVIDEOS

Search

Search

                                - All Images 
                                - Other 
                                - Space Shuttle 

                                - Upload Date
                                - Photo Date
                                - Title

----

Download Image: Full Size (1.79 MB)

Tags:MARFORCYBER, COC, USMCNews, USSPACECOM, MARFORSPACE, MCIC, DMAM

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3785 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3785

To amend title 49, United States Code, to eliminate the restriction on 
   veterans concurrently serving in the Offices of Administrator and 
      Deputy Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                March 8 (legislative day, March 7), 2022

  Mr. Wicker introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 49, United States Code, to eliminate the restriction on 
   veterans concurrently serving in the Offices of Administrator and 
      Deputy Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF RESTRICTION ON VETERANS CONCURRENTLY SERVING IN 
              THE OFFICES OF ADMINISTRATOR AND DEPUTY ADMINISTRATOR OF 
              THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION.

    Section 106(d)(1) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``, a retired regular officer of an armed force, or a former 
regular officer of an armed force''.
                                 <all>
```