alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND IN
THE COMPANY'S 10-K FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       3,500,556
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               22,205,155
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (763,047)
<INVENTORY>                                 15,755,379
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            43,864,223
<PP&E>                                      10,765,248
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,443,531
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              92,007,855
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,779,882
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    50,554,450
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,732,649
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                92,007,855
<SALES>                                    105,999,233
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           105,999,233
<CGS>                                       44,480,959
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               87,322,690
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               210,522
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             287,576
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             19,354,093
<INCOME-TAX>                                 6,631,322
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         19,354,093
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                12,278,388
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.99


</TABLE>
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and GraphsUpdated May 3, 2006   |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|

| Level of Monthly Benefits (PIA) | Description of Proposed Provision:      Progressive price indexing of PIA formula factors beginning with individuals newly eligible for OASDI benefits in 2012.  Create new bend point at the 40th percentile of earners.  Maintain current-law benefits for earners at the 40th percentile and below and reduce upper 2 formula factors (32% and 15%) such that maximum worker benefit grows by inflation rather than the growth in average wages. |
|---------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2005 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map |
SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

IN THE MATTER OF RESIGNATION No. 70183 OF GARY A. HENGSTLER, BAR NO. 9477. 

# FILE

BY 

### MAY 0 9 2016
TA- E K. LINDEMAN et, 

# e i the RT `E

.11 DE rv - -

- tr 

### ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR RESIGNATION This is a joint petition by the State Bar of Nevada and attorney Gary A. Hengstler for his resignation from the Nevada bar.

SCR 98(5) provides that Nevada attorneys who are not actively practicing law in this state may resign from the state bar if certain conditions are met. The petition includes statements from state bar staff confirming that no disciplinary, fee dispute arbitration, or client security fund matters are pending against Hengstler; and that he is current on all membership fee payments and other financial commitments relating to his practice of law in this state. 

### See SCR 98(5)(a)(1)-(2).

Bar counsel has recommended that the resignation be approved, and the Board of Governors has approved the application for resignation. 

### See SCR 98(5)(a)(2). Hengstler acknowledges that his resignation is irrevocable and that the state bar retains continuing jurisdiction with respect to matters involving a past member's conduct prior to resignation. 

### See SCR 98(5)(c)-(d). Finally, Hengstler has submitted an affidavit of compliance with SCR 115. 

### See SCR 98(5)(e).

(0) PIO* 

### e 

# 6- *132_The petition satisfies the requirements of SCR 98(5).

Accordingly, we approve attorney Gary A. Hengstler's resignation. SCR 98(5)(a)(2). The petition is hereby granted.

It is so ORDERED.

C.J. Parraguirre

, J. Hardesty 

# < J. Douglas

Pickering

cc: Gary A. Hengstler C. Stanley Hunterton, Bar Counsel, State Bar of Nevada Kimberly K. Farmer, Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada Perry Thompson, Admissions Officer, U.S. Supreme Court

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2
(0) 1947A peep,
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 246 (Friday, December 22, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 66579]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31235]








FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE BOARD

Federal Register CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 60 FR 63573, 
December 11, 1995.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING: 10 A.M., December 
13, 1995.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING: The following topics were withdrawn from the 
open portion of the meeting: Approval of AHP District Priorities; 
appointment of FHLBank Public Interest Directors; appointment of 
FHLBank Chairs; and repeal of Finance Board Regulation on Charitable 
Donations by the FHLBanks.
    The following topic was withdrawn from the close portion of the 
meeting: FHLBank of San Francisco Affordable Housing Subsidies on 
Guaranteed Rate Advances.
    The Board determined that agency business required its 
consideration of these matters on less than seven days notice to the 
public and that no earlier notice of these changes in the subject 
matter of the meeting was possible.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Elaine L. Baker, Secretary to the 
Board, (202) 408-2837.

Rita I. Fair,

Managing Director.

[FR Doc. 95-31235 Filed 12-20-95; 1:02 pm]

BILLING CODE 6725-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 4 (Friday, January 6, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 2083]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-331]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED

Addition

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Addition to the Procurement List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action adds to the Procurement List a service to be 
furnished by nonprofit agencies employing persons who are blind or have 
other severe disabilities.

EFFECTIVE DATES: February 6, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, Crystal Square 3, Suite 403, 1735 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Arlington, Virginia 22202-3461.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Milkman (703) 603-7740.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 29, 1994, the Committee for Purchase 
From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled published notices (59 
F.R. 38586) of proposed addition to the Procurement List.
    After consideration of the material presented to it concerning 
capability of qualified nonprofit agencies to provide the service, fair 
market price, and impact of the addition on the current or most recent 
contractors, the Committee has determined that the services listed 
below are suitable for procurement by the Federal Government under 41 
U.S.C. 46-48d and 41 CFR 51-2.4.
    I certify that the following action will not have a significant 
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The major factors 
considered for this certification were:
    1. The action will not result in any additional reporting, 
recordkeeping or other compliance requirements for small entities other 
than the small organizations that will furnish the service to the 
Government.
    2. The action does not appear to have a severe economic impact on 
current contractors for the service.
    3. The action will result in authorizing small entities to furnish 
the service to the Government.
    4. There are no known regulatory alternatives which would 
accomplish the objectives of the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46-
48c) in connection with the service proposed for addition to the 
Procurement List.
    Accordingly, the following service is hereby added to the 
Procurement List:

Janitorial/Custodial for the following locations: Federal Building, 
Plattsburgh, New York
U.S. Border Station, Champlain, New York

    This action does not affect current contracts awarded prior to the 
effective date of this addition or options exercised under those 
contracts.
Beverly L. Milkman,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 95-331 Filed 1-5-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-33-p
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Commerce Office of the Secretary
 AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Commerce.
 ACTION: General Notice Announcing Population Estimates.
 SUMMARY: This notice announces the voting age population estimates as of July 1, 2015, for each state and the District of Columbia. We are providing this notice in accordance with the 1976 amendment to the Federal Election Campaign Act, Title 52, United States Code, Section 30116(e).
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Humes, Chief, Population Division, U.S. Census Bureau, Room HQ-5H174, Washington, DC 20233, at 301-763-2071.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the requirements of the 1976 amendment to the Federal Election Campaign Act, Title 52, United States Code, Section 30116(e), I hereby give notice that the estimates of the voting age population for July 1, 2015, for each state and the District of Columbia are as shown in the following table. Estimates of the Population of Voting Age for Each State and the District of Columbia: July 1, 2015
Area
Population 18 and over
Area
Population 18 and overUnited States
247,773,709Alabama
3,755,483
Missouri
4,692,196Alaska
552,166
Montana
806,529Arizona
5,205,215
Nebraska
1,425,853Arkansas
2,272,904
Nevada
2,221,681California
30,023,902
New Hampshire
1,066,610Colorado
4,199,509
New Jersey
6,959,192( print page 5985)Connecticut
2,826,827
New Mexico
1,588,201Delaware
741,548
New York
15,584,974District of Columbia
554,121
North Carolina
7,752,234Florida
16,166,143
North Dakota
583,001Georgia
7,710,688
Ohio
8,984,946Hawaii
1,120,770
Oklahoma
2,950,017Idaho
1,222,093
Oregon
3,166,121Illinois
9,901,322
Pennsylvania
10,112,229Indiana
5,040,224
Rhode Island
845,254Iowa
2,395,103
South Carolina
3,804,558Kansas
2,192,084
South Dakota
647,145Kentucky
3,413,425
Tennessee
5,102,688Louisiana
3,555,911
Texas
20,257,343Maine
1,072,948
Utah
2,083,423Maryland
4,658,175
Vermont
506,119Massachusetts
5,407,335
Virginia
6,512,571Michigan
7,715,272
Washington
5,558,509Minnesota
4,205,207
West Virginia
1,464,532Mississippi
2,265,485
Wisconsin
4,476,711Wyoming
447,212**Source:**
                         U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division, Vintage 2015 Population Estimates.
 I have certified these estimates for the Federal Election Commission. Dated: January 21, 2016. Penny Pritzker, Secretary, U.S. Department of Commerce.


[FR Doc. 2016-02019 Filed 2-3-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-07-P
### Proposed Provision: A7. Starting December 2024, reduce the annual COLA by 1 percentage point, but not to less than zero. In cases where the unreduced COLA is less than 1 percentage point, do not carry over the unused reduction into future years.
| 2003 OASDI Trustees Report |  |  |  |  |  |
|----------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|
|                            |

 II. OVERVIEW

II.D1 Short-Range OASDI Trust Fund Ratios

II.D2 OASDI Income and Cost Rates Under Intermediate Assumptions

II.D3 Number of Covered Workers Per OASDI Beneficiary

II.D4 Cumulative OASDI Income Less Cost, Based on Present Law Tax Rates and Scheduled Benefits

II.D5 OASDI Cost as a Percentage of GDP

II.D6 OASDI Annual Income Less Cost as Percent of Taxable Payroll 2002 and 2003 Trustees Reports

II.D7 Long-Range OASDI Trust Fund Ratios Under Alternative Assumptions

 IV. ACTUARIAL ESTIMATES

IV.A1 Short-Range OASI and DI Trust Fund Ratios

IV.B1 Long-Range OASI and DI Annual Income Rates and Cost Rates

IV.B2 Number of OASDI Beneficiaries Per 100 Covered Workers

IV.B3 Long-Range OASI and DI Trust Fund Ratios

IV.B4 Long-Range Test of Close Actuarial Balance

IV.B5 OASDI Annual Balances: 2002 and 2003 Reports

 V. ASSUMPTIONS AND METHODS UNDERLYING ACTUARIAL ESTIMATES

V.C1 Primary-Insurance-Amount Formula for the 2003 Cohort

V.C2 Maximum-Family-Benefit Formula for the 2003 Cohort

V.C3 DI Disabled Worker Incidence Rates, 1970-2012

 VI. APPENDICES

VI.E1 Annual Trust Fund Ratios

VI.E2 Annual Cost Rates

VI.F1 Estimated OASDI Income and Cost in Constant Dollars, Based on Intermediate Assumptions

----

|  |  |  |  |  |  |
|--|--|--|--|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy        | Website Policies & Other ImportantInformation        | Site Map        | Actuarial Publications | 3/17/2003 |
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended December 31, 2007
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a)-14(b) or 15(d)-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the
periods indicated.
  By:
    /s/ PERVEZ QURESHIPervez Qureshi  President
& Chief Executive Officer
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 75th 

Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

-2.00% -4.34% -0.13% -0.19% -2.13% -4.53%

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Level of Monthly Benefits (PIA)

Proposed Provision: Beginning in 2010, increase the special minimum benefit by making the following 

changes: (a) A year of coverage is defined as a year in which 4 quarters of coverage are earned. (b) At 

implementation, set the PIA for 30 years of coverage equal to 125 percent of the monthly poverty level 

(about $1,128 in 2009). The PIA per year of coverage (after the first 10 years) would be $1,128/20 = 

$56.40. (c) Index the initial PIA per year of coverage by wage growth for successive cohorts, so that the 

special minimum keeps up with the wage-indexed benefit formula.

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this provision

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Cost rates with this provision

Income rates under present law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under present law

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Present law With this provision

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2009 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary, Social Security

November 4, 2009

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Cost rates with this provision

Income rates under present law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under present law

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Present law With this provision
#### STATE v. DUNCAN THOMAS.

(Filed 11 December, 1946.)

Criminal Daw § 67—

An appeal to tlie Supreme Court does not lie from a discretionary determination of an application by defendant for a, new trial on tlie ground of newly discovered evidence.

Appeal by defendant from *Parker, J.,*at 19 August, 1946, Term, of Hoke.

Criminal prosecution upon two bills of indictment charging defendant with receiving stolen property, to wit, a certain quantity of tobacco, knowing the same to be stolen. Yerdict: Guilty as charged in both cases. Judgments imposed at November Term, .1945, and affirmed on appeal to Supreme Court at Spring Term, 1946, 226 N. C., 384, 38 S. E. (2d), 166. Thereafter, at August Term, 1946, of Superior' Court of Hoke County, defendant filed motion for a new trial on account of newly discovered evidence, — supporting same by certain affidavits. The judge presiding, being of “opinion that the affidavits offered do not meet the test for a new trial as laid down in *S. v. Casey,*201 N. C., 620, and *S. v. Edwards,*205 N. C., 661, and similar cases,” denied the motion in his discretion, and entered judgment in accordance therewith.

Defendant appeals therefrom to Supreme Court, and assigns error.

*Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorneys-General Bruton, Rhodes, and Moody for the State.*

*Franklin S. Clark and W. S. Britt for defendant', appellant.*

Per Curiam.

Appeal to this Court does not lie from a discretionary determination of an application for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. See *S. v. Rodgers,*217 N. C., 622, 8 S. E. (2d), 927, and cases cited. Hence, the appeal in the present case is

Dismissed.
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Level of Monthly Benefits (PIA) | Description of Proposed Provision:      Beginning with those newly eligible for OASDI benefits in 2015 and later, reduce PIA formula factors so that benefits grow by inflation rather than by increases in real wages |
|---------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2008 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified July 16, 2008 |
SCPW-13-0000100

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

CHRIS GRINDLING, 

Petitioner,

vs.

THE HONORABLE JOSEPH CARDOZA, JUDGE, SECOND CIRCUIT COURT,

Respondent.

 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(S.P.P. No. 12-1-0007) 

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

Upon consideration of petitioner Christopher

Grindling’s petition for a writ of mandamus, which was filed on

February 19, 2013, and the record, it appears that petitioner

fails to demonstrate a clear and indisputable right to relief. 

See HRPP 40(f) and (i). Although petitioner is entitled to a

timely ruling on his Rule 40 petition, he is not entitled to the

mandamus relief requested at this time. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91

Hawai#i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (A writ of mandamus is

an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner

demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-13-0000100

04-MAR-2013

09:24 AM
of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or

obtain the requested action). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate

court shall process the petition for a writ of mandamus without

payment of the filing fee.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for a

writ of mandamus is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, March 4, 2013.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

2
II 

Calendar No. 236 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3456 

To enact the definition of ‘‘waters of the United States’’ into law, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 10, 2022 

Mrs. CAPITO introduced the following bill; which was read the first time 

JANUARY 18, 2022 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

A BILL 

To enact the definition of ‘‘waters of the United States’’ 

into law, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Navigable Waters Pro5 tection Act of 2022’’. 

6 SEC. 2. WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES. 

7 The definitions of the term ‘‘waters of the United 

8 States’’ and the other terms defined in section 328.3 of 


SSpencer on DSK126QN23PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3456 PCS

1 title 33, Code of Federal Regulations (as in effect on Jan2 uary 1, 2021), are enacted into law. 


SSpencer on DSK126QN23PROD with BILLS

SSpencer on DSK126QN23PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 236 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3456 

A BILL 

To enact the definition of ‘‘waters of the United 

States’’ into law, and for other purposes. 

JANUARY 18, 2022 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 


SSpencer on DSK126QN23PROD with BILLS