10036 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 36 / Thursday, February 23, 1995 / Rules and Regulations

1992 water years. This represents 1.1

percent of the 45,000 landholders

subject to the RRA form requirements

and 0.2 percent of the 230,000

landholders in districts subject to the

RRA. The violations were found in 60

different districts, which is

approximately 20 percent of the districts

subject to the ownership and full-cost

pricing provisions of the RRA and about

10 percent of the total districts that have

entered contracts with the United States

for receipt of irrigation water.

The administrative cost assessment of

$260 will in most cases be less than the

full-cost charges that Reclamation

previously assessed for RRA form

violations pursuant to its compensation

policy. Therefore, in comparison, the

assessment will generally have a

positive economic effect on most

landholders and districts involved with

form violations.

Based on the preceding, Reclamation

has certified that the rule will not have

a significant economic effect on a

substantial number of small entities.

Small entities also are able to avoid all

negative effects by complying with the

form requirements of the RRA and

Acreage Limitation Rules and

Regulations.

Civil Justice Reform

The Department of the Interior has

certified to the Office of Management

and Budget that this proposed rule

meets the applicable standards provided

in sections 2(a) and 2(b)(2) of Executive

Order 12778.

Authorship

This proposed rule was prepared by

staff in the Reclamation Law, Contracts,

and Repayment Office, D–5200, Bureau

of Reclamation, Denver, Colorado.

List of Subjects in 43 CFR Part 426

Administrative practice and

procedure, Irrigation, Reclamation,

Reporting and recordkeeping

requirements.

For the reasons stated in the

preamble, 43 CFR Part 426 is amended

as follows:

Dated: January 11, 1995.

Elizabeth Ann Rieke,

Assistant Secretary—Water and Science.

PART 426—RULES AND

REGULATIONS FOR PROJECTS

GOVERNED BY FEDERAL

RECLAMATION LAW

1. The authority citation for Part 426

is revised to read as follows:

Authority: 43 U.S.C. 371–383; 43 U.S.C.

390aa–390zz–1; 31 U.S.C. 9701.

2. Section 426.24 is redesignated as

§ 426.25, and new section 426.24 is

added to read as follows:

§ 426.24 Assessments of administrative

costs.

(a) Forms submittal. A district will be

assessed for the administrative costs

described in paragraph (e) of this

section when irrigation water has been

delivered to landholders that did not

submit certification or reporting forms

before receiving irrigation water in

accordance with § 426.10(e). The

assessment will be applied on a yearly

basis in each district for each

landholder that received irrigation water

but failed to comply with § 426.10(e). In

applying the assessment to legal

entities, compliance by an entity will be

treated independently from compliance

by its part owners or beneficiaries. The

assessment in this paragraph will be

applied independently of the

assessment set forth in paragraph (b) of

this section.

(b) Forms corrections. Where

corrections are needed on certification

or reporting forms, the requirements of

§ 426.10(a) will be deemed to have been

met so long as the district provides

corrected forms to Reclamation within

60 calendar days of the date of

Reclamation’s written request for

corrections. A district will be assessed

for the administrative costs described in

paragraph (e) of this section when

corrected forms are not provided within

this 60-day time period. The assessment

will be applied on a yearly basis in each

district for each landholder that

received irrigation water and for whom

corrected forms are not provided within

the applicable 60-day time period. In

applying the assessment to legal

entities, compliance by an entity will be

treated independently from compliance

by its part owners or beneficiaries. The

assessment in this paragraph will be

applied independently of the

assessment set forth in paragraph (a) of

this section.

(c) Parties responsible for paying

assessments. Districts shall be

responsible for payment of the

assessments described in paragraphs (a)

and (b) of this section.

(d) Disposition of assessments. The

administrative costs assessed and

collected under paragraphs (a) and (b) of

this section will be deposited to the

general fund of the United States

Treasury as miscellaneous receipts.

(e) Amount of assessment. The

assessment for administrative costs shall

be set periodically on the basis of the

average costs associated with

performing activities to address

certification and reporting form

violations. Initially the amount shall be

$260. This assessment for

administrative costs will be reviewed at

least once every 5 years and adjusted, if

needed, to reflect new cost data. Notice

of the revised assessment for

administrative costs will be published

in the Federal Register in December of

the year the data is reviewed.

[FR Doc. 95–4416 Filed 2–22–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE –94–P

FEDERAL EMERGENCY

MANAGEMENT AGENCY

44 CFR Part 64

[Docket No. FEMA–7611]

List of Communities Eligible for the

Sale of Flood Insurance

AGENCY: Federal Emergency

Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: This rule identifies

communities participating in the

National Flood Insurance Program

(NFIP). These communities have

applied to the program and have agreed

to enact certain floodplain management

measures. The communities’

participation in the program authorizes

the sale of flood insurance to owners of

property located in the communities

listed.

EFFECTIVE DATES: The dates listed in the

third column of the table.

ADDRESSES: Flood insurance policies for

property located in the communities

listed can be obtained from any licensed

property insurance agent or broker

serving the eligible community, or from

the NFIP at: Post Office Box 6464,

Rockville, MD 20849, (800) 638–6620.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Robert F. Shea, Jr., Division Director,

Program Implementation Division,

Mitigation Directorate, 500 C Street SW.,

room 417, Washington, DC 20472, (202)

646–3619.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NFIP

enables property owners to purchase

flood insurance which is generally not

otherwise available. In return,

communities agree to adopt and

administer local floodplain management

measures aimed at protecting lives and

new construction from future flooding.

Since the communities on the attached

list have recently entered the NFIP,

subsidized flood insurance is now

available for property in the community.

In addition, the Director of the

Federal Emergency Management Agency

has identified the special flood hazard
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 36 / Thursday, February 23, 1995 / Rules and Regulations 10037

areas in some of these communities by

publishing a Flood Hazard Boundary

Map (FHBM) or Flood Insurance Rate

Map (FIRM). The date of the flood map,

if one has been published, is indicated

in the fourth column of the table. In the

communities listed where a flood map

has been published, Section 102 of the

Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, as

amended, 42 U.S.C. 4012(a), requires

the purchase of flood insurance as a

condition of Federal or federally related

financial assistance for acquisition or

construction of buildings in the special

flood hazard areas shown on the map.

The Director finds that the delayed

effective dates would be contrary to the

public interest. The Director also finds

that notice and public procedure under

5 U.S.C. 553(b) are impracticable and

unnecessary.

National Environmental Policy Act

This rule is categorically excluded

from the requirements of 44 CFR Part

10, Environmental Considerations. No

environmental impact assessment has

been prepared.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

The Associate Director certifies that

this rule will not have a significant

economic impact on a substantial

number of small entities in accordance

with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5

U.S.C. 601 et seq., because the rule

creates no additional burden, but lists

those communities eligible for the sale

of flood insurance.

Regulatory Classification

This final rule is not a significant

regulatory action under the criteria of

section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 of

September 30, 1993, Regulatory

Planning and Review, 58 FR 51735.

Paperwork Reduction Act

This rule does not involve any

collection of information for purposes of

the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.

3501 et seq.

Executive Order 12612, Federalism

This rule involves no policies that

have federalism implications under

Executive Order 12612, Federalism,

October 26, 1987, 3 CFR, 1987 Comp.,

p. 252.

Executive Order 12778, Civil Justice

Reform

This rule meets the applicable

standards of section 2(b)(2) of Executive

Order 12778, October 25, 1991, 56 FR

55195, 3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p. 309.

List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 64

Flood insurance, Floodplains.

Accordingly, 44 CFR part 64 is

amended as follows:

PART 64—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for Part 64

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.,

Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1978, 3 CFR,

1978 Comp., p. 329; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367,

3 CFR, 1979 Comp., p. 376.

§ 64.6 [Amended]

2. The tables published under the

authority of § 64.6 are amended as

follows:

State/location Community

No.

Effective date of authorization/cancellation of sale of

flood insurance in community

Current effective

map date

New Eligibles—Emergency Program

Alabama: Clayhatchee, town of, Dale County ......................................................... 010415 January 6, 1995.

Georgia: McDonough, city of, Henry County ........................................................... 130342 ......do ................................ December 28,

1979.

North Carolina:

Huntersville, town of, Mecklenburg County ...................................................... 370478 January 11, 1995.

Matthews, town of, Mecklenburg County .......................................................... 370310 ......do.

Texas: Point Blank, city of, San Jacinto County ...................................................... 481528 January 13, 1995 May 1, 1979.

Georgia:

Butts County, unincorporated areas ................................................................. 130518 January 24, 1995.

Jasper County, unincorporated areas ............................................................... 130519 ......do.

Oklahoma: Harmon County, unincorporated areas ................................................. 400545 January 27, 1995.

North Dakota:

Ramsey County, unincorporated areas ............................................................ 380092 January 31, 1995.

Benson County, unincorporated areas ............................................................. 380682 ......do.

Amenia, city of, Cass County ........................................................................... 380019 ......do.

New Eligibles—Regular Program

Mississippi: Flora, town of, Madison County1 .......................................................... 280399 January 31, 1995 ............. April 15, 1994.

Reinstatements—Regular Program

Indiana: Steuben County, unincorporated area ....................................................... 180243 August 26, 1975, Emerg.;

July 3, 1986, Reg.; October 4, 1994, Susp.;

January 11, 1995, Rein.

July 3, 1986.

Illinois: Barrington Hills, village of, Cook, Kane, McHenry and Lake Counties ....... 170058 April 3, 1975, Emerg.; August 10, 1979, Reg.;

January 5, 1995, Susp.;

January 13, 1995, Rein.

August 10, 1979.

North Carolina: North Wilkesboro, town of, Wilkes County ..................................... 370257 December 28, 1973,

Emerg.; February 15,

1978, Reg.; February

20, 1978, Susp.; January 31, 1995, Rein.

February 15,

1978.
10038 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 36 / Thursday, February 23, 1995 / Rules and Regulations

State/location Community

No.

Effective date of authorization/cancellation of sale of

flood insurance in community

Current effective

map date

Georgia: Clayton, city of, Rabun County ................................................................. 130157 July 25, 1975, Emerg.; August 13, 1984, With.;

January 13, 1988, Rein.;

January 13, 1988, Reg.;

January 19, 1994,

Susp.; January 31,

1995, Rein.

June 19, 1989.

Regular Program Conversions

Region III:

Pennsylvania: Allentown, city of, Lehigh County ..................................................... 420585 January 5, 1995, suspension withdrawn.January 5, 1995.

Virginia:

Dumfries, town of, Prince William County ........................................................ 510120 ......do ................................ Do.

Manassas, city of, Independent city ................................................................. 510122 ......do ................................ Do.

Manassas Park, city of, Independent city ......................................................... 510123 ......do ................................ Do.

Occoquan, town of, Prince William County ...................................................... 510124 ......do ................................ Do.

Prince William County, unincorporated areas .................................................. 510119 ......do ................................ Do.

Kentucky:

Beaver Dam, town of, Ohio County .................................................................. 210184 January 19, 1995, Suspension Withdrawn.September 29,

1989.

Henderson County, unincorporated areas ........................................................ 210286 ......do ................................ February 6,

1991.

Lewisburg, city of, Logan County ..................................................................... 210149 ......do ................................ June 17, 1977.

Loyall, city of, Harlan County ............................................................................ 210589 ......do ................................ December 11,

1981.

Maysville, city of, Mason County ...................................................................... 210168 ......do ................................ March 7, 1980.

Murray, city of, Calloway County ...................................................................... 210033 ......do ................................ April 1, 1980.

Region IV:

Arkansas: Bentonville, city of, Benton County ......................................................... 050012 ......do ................................ September 18,

1991.

Region VII:

Nebraska:

Bellevue, city of, Sarpy County ......................................................................... 310191 ......do ................................ January 19,

1995.

La Vista, city of, Sarpy County ......................................................................... 310192 ......do ................................ Do.

Papillion, city of, Sarpy County ......................................................................... 315275 ......do ................................ Do.

Sarpy County, unincorporated areas ................................................................ 310190 ......do ................................ Do.

Springfield, city of, Sarpy County ..................................................................... 310194 ......do ................................ Do.

NOTE: The Town of Batesburg, South Carolina has merged with the Town of Leesville to become one governmental jurisdiction. The new

name is the ‘‘Town of Batesburg-Leesville.’’ Community number 450130 will be maintained for the new community. 1The Town of Flora has no special flood hazard areas (NSFHA). The town is a part of Madison County’s countywide Flood Insurance Rate

Map (FIRM) issued 4–15–94.

Code for reading third column: Emerg.—Emergency; Reg.—Regular; Susp.—Suspension, Rein.—Reinstatement.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No.

83.100, ‘‘Flood Insurance.’’)

Issued: February 16, 1995.

Frank H. Thomas,

Deputy Associate Director, Mitigation

Directorate.

[FR Doc. 95–4414 Filed 2–22–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6718–21–P

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

47 CFR Parts 1, 2, 21, and 94

[WT Docket No. 94–148, DA 95–140]

Terrestrial Microwave Fixed Radio

Services

AGENCY: Federal Communications

Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; extension of time.

SUMMARY: The Order provides

additional time to respond to the

revision of the Commission’s rules

regarding the establishment of a new

part for terrestrial microwave fixed

radio services. This action was in

response to a request from the

Telecommunications Industry

Association (TIA). It will allow ITA and

others to prepare better reponses to the

complex changes proposed to the

microwave rules.

DATES: Comments are due on or before

February 17, 1995 and reply comments

are due on or before March 17, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Robert James Federal Communications

Commission Washington, D.C. (202)

418–0680.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Order

Adopted: January 31, 1995.

Released: February 2, 1995.

By the Chief, Wireless

Telecommunications Bureau:

1. Before the Bureau is a request for

additional time within which to

respond to the Commission’s Notice of

Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in WT

Docket No. 94–148, filed by Fixed Pointto-Point Communications Section,

Network Equipment Division of the

Telecommunications Industry

Association (TIA). In support of this

request, TIA states that the proposed

changes are complex. As the principal

industry association representing

microwave manufacturers, it needs time

to coordinate among its members to

ensure that the Association’s comments

reflect industry consensus.