alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DONNIE MONROE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2024-0476

[May 23, 2024]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Andrew L. Siegel,

Judge; L.T. Case No. 15-3612CF10A.

Donnie Monroe, Cross City, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, GERBER and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### JANET SESSOMS v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY.

(Filed 1 November, 1935.)

Appeal and Error J d—

Where the Supreme Court is evenly divided in opinion, one Justice not sitting, the judgment of the lower court will be affirmed without becoming a precedent.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Parker, J.,*at March Term, 1935, of *Sampson.*

Civil action to recover damages for an alleged negligent injury resulting from crossing collision when the automobile in which plaintiff was riding as a guest — returning from a dance at White Lake — was driven into a box car of defendant’s freight train standing across the highway at Garland, N. C., at about 2:05 a.m. on tbe morning of 16 May, 1933.

The plaintiff invokes the doctrine announced in *Dickey v. R. R.,*196 N. C., 726, 147 S. E., 15; *Dudley v. R. R.,*180 N. C., 34, 103 S. E., 905; *Blum v. R. R.,*187 N. C., 640, 122 S. E., 562; *Leathers v. Tobacco Co.,*144 N. O.,' 330, 57 S. E., 11; *Duffy v. R. R., ib.,*26, 56 S. E., 557; *Alexander v. R. R.,*112 N. O., 720, 16 S. E., 896.

The defendant relies upon the decisions in *Baker v. R. R.,*205 N. C., 329, 171 S. E., 342; *Batchelor v. R. R.,*196 N. O., 84, 144 S. E., 542; *Eller v. R. R.,*200 N. C,, 527, 157 S. E., 800; *Goldstein v. R. R.,*203 N. O., 166, 165 S. E., 337; *Eermrn v. R. R.,*197 N. 0., 718, 150 S. E., 361; *Weston v. Ry. Co.,*194 N. C., 210, 139 S. E., 237.

From a judgment of nonsuit entered at the close of all the evidence, the plaintiff appeals, assigning errors.

*845*Butler & Butter for plaintiff.*

*Graham & Grady and Carr, Poisson •& James for defendant.*

Pub Oueiam.

The Court being equally divided in opinion, *Brogden, J.,*not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed in accordance with the usual practice in such cases, and stands as the decision in this case without becoming a precedent. *Smith v. Powell, ante,*837; *Sondey v. Yates, ante,*836.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Gary S. Titus, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                                                                
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: March 13, 2009 |  |  |  | /S/    GARY S.
TITUS                                           
|                     |  |  |  | Gary S. Titus Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be
retained by SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### C. S. MUNRO v. CAROLINA RUBBER COMPANY and JUSTUS COLLINS.

(Filed 6 June, 1930.)

Pleadings D a — Demurrer should be overruled if the allegations of the complaint are sufficient to any extent to allege cause of action.

Where a complaint to any extent states a cause of action, or sufficient facts can be gathered therefrom, its allegation taken to be true, a demurrer thereto should be overruled.

Appeal by defendants from *Stacie, J.,*at September Term, 1929, of RowaN.

Affirmed.

*R. Lee 'Wright for plaintiff.*

*John Q. Busby and W. T. Shuford for defendants.*

Pee Cueiam.

The defendants demurred to the complaint. The court below overruled the demurrer. The defendant excepted, assigned error and appealed to the Supreme Court. We think the demurrer should have been overruled.

On a demurrer we consider only the sufficiency of the allegations set forth in the complaint. For the purpose of the demurrer the allegations are taken to be true. A demurrer cannot be sustained to a complaint if in any portion or to any extent it presents a cause of action, or if sufficient facts can be fairly gathered therefrom. On this aspect we think the demurrer should have been overruled. The judgment below is

Affirmed.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                     EXHIBIT  11

                                EASTON BANCORP, INC.
                         COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                                                   Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
                                                 ----------------------------------
                                                    2000        1999        1998
                                                 ----------  ----------  ----------
<S>                                              <C>         <C>         <C>
Net income

                                                 $  503,745  $  494,345  $  444,044
                                                 ==========  ==========  ==========
Average shares outstanding                          560,318     560,318     560,071

Basic earnings per share                         $     0.90  $     0.88  $     0.79
                                                 ==========  ==========  ==========

Average shares outstanding                          560,318     560,318     560,071
Dilutive average shares outstanding under
        warrants and options                        263,800     245,236     209,832
Exercise price                                   $    10.00  $    10.00  $    10.00
Assumed proceeds on exercise                     $2,638,000  $2,452,360  $2,098,320
Average market value                             $    10.63  $    10.16  $    12.50
Less:   Treasury stock purchased with assumed
        proceeds from exercise of warrants and
        options                                     248,166     241,374     167,866
Adjusted average shares-diluted                     575,952     564,180     602,037
Diluted earnings per share                       $     0.87  $     0.88  $     0.74
                                                 ==========  ==========  ==========
</TABLE>

     The stock of the Company is not traded on any public exchange.  The average
market  values  are  derived from trades known to management.  Private sales may
occur  where  management  of  the  Company  is  unaware  of  the  sales  price.


<PAGE>
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5767 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude certain compensation 

received by public safety officers and their dependents from gross income. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 20, 2014 

Mr. PAULSEN (for himself and Mr. REICHERT) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude 

certain compensation received by public safety officers 

and their dependents from gross income. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Don’t Tax Our Fallen 

5 Public Safety Heroes Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN COMPENSATION RE7 CEIVED BY PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICERS AND 

8 THEIR DEPENDENTS. 

9 Subsection (a) of section 104 of the Internal Revenue 

10 Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5767 IH

1 of paragraph (4), by striking the period at the end of para2 graph (5) and inserting ‘‘; and’’, and by inserting after 

3 paragraph (5) the following new paragraph: 

4 ‘‘(6) amounts received pursuant to— 

5 ‘‘(A) section 1201 of the Omnibus Crime 

6 Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 

7 U.S.C. 3796); or 

8 ‘‘(B) a program established under the laws 

9 of any State which provides monetary com10 pensation for surviving dependents of a public 

11 safety officer who has died as the direct and 

12 proximate result of a personal injury sustained 

13 in the line of duty, except that subparagraph 

14 (B) shall not apply to any amounts that would 

15 have been payable if death of the public safety 

16 officer had occurred other than as the direct 

17 and proximate result of a personal injury sus18 tained in the line of duty.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 27 (Thursday, February 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7753]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3216]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[I.D. 012695A]

Endangered Species; Permits

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Issuance of Permit 942 to Jane Provancha (P576).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    On December 16, 1994, notice was published (59 FR 65016) that an 
application had been filed by Jane Provancha of the Biomedical 
Operations and Research Office of Kennedy Space Center (P576) to take 
listed green and loggerhead sea turtles (Chelonia mydas and Caretta 
caretta), to determine population and distribution trends in Mosquito 
Lagoon, FL, as authorized by the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) 
(16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) and the NMFS regulations governing listed fish 
and wildlife permits (50 CFR parts 217-222).
    Notice is hereby given that on February 3, 1995, as authorized by 
the provisions of the ESA, NMFS issued Permit No. 942 for the above 
taking, subject to certain conditions set forth therein.
    Issuance of this permit, as required by the ESA, was based on a 
finding that such permit: (1) Was applied for in good faith; (2) will 
not operate to the disadvantage of the listed species which are the 
subject of this permit; (3) is consistent with the purposes and 
policies set forth in section 2 of the ESA. This permit was also issued 
in accordance with and is subject to parts 217-222 of Title 50 CFR, the 
NMFS regulations governing listed species permits.
    The application, permit, and supporting documentation are available 
for review by interested persons in the following offices, by 
appointment:
    Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, 1335 East-West Highway, Silver 
Spring, MD 20910-3226 (301-713-1401); and
    Southeast Region, NMFS, NOAA, 9721 Executive Center Drive, St. 
Petersburg, FL 33702-2432 (813-893-3141).

    Dated: February 3, 1995.
Patricia A. Montanio,
Acting Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 95-3216 Filed 2-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SUBSIDIARY                                   STATE OF INCORPORATION   DOES BUSINESS AS
-------------------------------------------- ------------------------ -------------------------
<S>                                          <C>                      <C>
3057011 Canada, Inc.                         Ontario, Canada
Answer Iowa, Inc.                            Iowa                     Westlink Paging
Arch Canada, Inc.                            Ontario, Canada
Arch Capitol District, Inc.                  New York                 Page New York
Arch Communications Enterprises, Inc.        Delaware                 Arch Nationwide Paging
                                                                      AD-VU
Arch Communications Services, Inc.           New York                 Page New York
Arch Connecticut Valley, Inc.                Massachusetts            Page New England
Arch Michigan, Inc.                          Delaware                 Page Michigan
Arch Southeast Communications, Inc.          Delaware                 Page South
                                                                      Interlink Communications
                                                                      Easy Beep
                                                                      First Page
                                                                      Pro Paging

Becker Beeper, Inc.                          Illinois                 Becker Beeper
The Beeper Company of America, Inc.          Colorado                 The Beeper Company
PCI Holding Company                          Pennsylvania             USA Mobile
Per-Com Wireless Enterprises, Inc.           Ontario, Canada
Premiere Page of Kansas, Inc.                Kansas                   USA Mobile
Professional Communications, Inc. (NY)       New York                 USA Mobile
Professional Communications, Inc. (PA)       Pennsylvania             USA Mobile
Professional Electronics, Inc.               Pennsylvania             USA Mobile
Q Media Company - Paging, Inc.               Delaware                 USA Mobile
Q Media Company - Paging, Inc.               Kansas                   USA Mobile
Q Media Paging - Alabama, Inc.               Delaware                 USA Mobile
USA Mobile Communications, Inc. II           Delaware                 USA Mobile
USA Mobile Communications, Inc. III          Delaware                 USA Mobile
W.Q. Communications, Inc.                    Kansas                   USA Mobile
The Westlink Company                         Delaware                 Westlink Paging
The Westlink Paging Company of New Mexico,   New Mexico               Westlink Paging
Inc.
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Dean
Witter Global Perspective Portfolio L.P. and is qualified in its entirety
by references to such financial instruments.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      20,791,474
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  290,382
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,267,408<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,267,408<F2>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,375,881<F3>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,609,805
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,766,076
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,766,076
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,766,076
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net unrealized
gain on open contracts of $3,368,107, $1,076,373 and option premiums paid
$109,179.
<F2>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $134,889, accrued incentive
fees of $448,724, accrued management fees of $55,367 accrued brokerage
commissions of $91,914, common administrative expenses payable of $17,045,
and accrued transaction fees and costs of $9,353.
<F3>Total revenues include realized trading revenue of $3,670,678, net change
in unrealized of ($158,241) and interest income of $863,444.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 239 (Wednesday, December 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64092-64093]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30302]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[File No. 1-9973]


Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application To Withdraw From Listing 
and Registration; (The Middleby Corporation, Common Stock, $0.01 Par 
Value)

December 7, 1995.
    The Middleby Corporation (``Company'') has filed an application 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant 
to Section 12(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') and 
Rule 12d2-2(d) promulgated thereunder, to withdraw the above specified 
security (``Security'') from listing and registration on the American 
Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Amex'').
    The reasons alleged in the application for withdrawing the Security 
from listing and registration include the following:

[[Page 64093]]

    According to the Company, its Board of Directors unanimously 
approved resolutions on October 24, 1995 to withdraw the Security from 
listing on the Amex and instead, to list the Security on the National 
Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations National Market 
System (``Nasdaq/MMS).
    The decision of the Board followed a thorough study of the matter 
and was based upon the belief that listing the Security on the Nasdaq/
NMS will be more beneficial to the Company's stockholders than the 
present listing on the Amex for the following reasons.
    (1) According to the Company, its Board of Directors determined 
that a listing on Nasdaq/NMS would provide greater coverage for the 
Security; and
    (2) According to the Company, its Board of Directors determined 
that a listing on the Nasdaq/NMS would provide improved liquidity to 
the Company's shareholders.
    Any interested person may, on or before December 29, 1995, submit 
by letter to the Secretary of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 
450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, facts bearing upon 
whether the application has been made in accordance with the rules of 
the exchanges and what terms, if any, should be imposed by the 
Commission for the protection of investors. The Commission, based on 
the information submitted to it, will issue an order granting the 
application after the date mentioned above unless the Commission 
determines to order a hearing on the matter.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
pursuant to delegated authority.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-30302 Filed 12-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
1 

# CASE NO. 14

– 0786

_____________________________________________

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

_____________________________________________

W ORLDWIDE 

### C LINICAL 

### T RIALS 

### , a/k/a WTC C ORPORATION



### , Petitioner

V.



### H ERLINDA 

### A RNOLD



### , Respondent

_____________________________________________

On Petition for Review from the Fourth Court of Appeals,

San Antonio, Texas, Case No. 04

– 13

– 00609

– CV

_____________________________________________

R ESPONDENT 

### ’ S 

### M OTION FOR 

### E XTENSION OF



### T IME TO 

### F ILE 

### R ESPONSE TO 

### P ETITIONER 

### ’ S 

### P ETITION FOR 

### R EVIEW



### _____________________________________________

Respondent, Herlinda Arnold, requests a 30

- day extension to fil e her response to

Petitioner’s Petition for R eview and for good cause, would show as follows:

1. The Fourth Court of Appeals issued its opinion and judgment in the underlying

appeal, Case Number No. 04

– 13

– 00609

– CV, on August 13, 2014

.

2. After being granted three extensions of time, Petitioner filed its Petition for

Review with this Court on November 25, 2014.

3

. Respondent’s response to Petitioner’s Petition for Review is December 24, 2014.

4. This is Respondent’s first request for an extension of time.

5. Respondent respectfully requests a 30

– day extension to file its response so that

the undersigned attorneys can adequately prepare the response. FILED

14-0786

12/24/2014 1:23:20 PM

tex-3589887

SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK2 6. The undersigned attorneys have not had sufficient time to respond to Petitioner’s

Petition for Review due to the Thanksgiving holidays, taking time off for vacation and

hearings and obligations in other cases.

7. Pur suant to TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3, the undersigned attorneys conferred with

counsel for Petitioner, but have yet to receive a response from opposing counsel with

regard to whether he is opposed to this motion.

FOR THESE REASONS, Respondent prays that this Hon orable Court grant this

Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Petitioner’s Petition for Review and

extend the deadline for filing the response to January 26, 2014 , and reque sts all other

relief to which she may be entitled.

Respectfully submitted,

Ecke and Poling, PLLC

By: ______ /s/

____________________ Joseph R. Ecke

SBN: 24082946

1203 Buena Vista #201

San Antonio, Texas 78207

Email: joe.ecke@gmail.com

Ph. (210) 645

- 5356

Fax (210) 775

- 6490

Law Office of Matthew S. Norris

By: ______ /s/

____________________ Matthew S. Norris3 TBA No. 24076881

6243 IH

- 10 West, Suite 1010

San Antonio, Texas 78201

Email: mattnorrislaw@gmail.com

Ph. (210) 549

- 7633

Fax (210) 446

- 4482

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a true and correct copy of the above has been served to all interested

parties of r ecord on this the 24 th day of December 2014.

Sean Michael Reagan

sreagan@lpmfirm.com

9545 Katy Freeway, Suite 200

Houston, Texas 77024

______ /s/

____________________ Joseph R. Ecke