alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 15 (Monday, January 25, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 3941]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-01398]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION

12 CFR Parts 600 and 606

RIN 3052-AD08

Organization and Functions; Enforcement of Nondiscrimination on 
the Basis of Handicap in Programs or Activities Conducted by the Farm 
Credit Administration; Organization of the Farm Credit Administration

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.

ACTION: Notice of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Farm Credit Administration (FCA, we, Agency or our) 
amended our regulations to reflect internal organization changes and to 
update a statutory citation for the Farm Credit Act. In accordance with 
the law, the effective date of the rule is no earlier than 30 days from 
the date of publication in the Federal Register during which either or 
both Houses of Congress are in session.

DATES: Under the authority of 12 U.S.C. 2252, the regulation amending 
12 CFR parts 600 and 606 published on November 5, 2015 (80 FR 68427) is 
effective January 25, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael T. Wilson, Policy Analyst, 
Office of Regulatory Policy, Farm Credit Administration, McLean, VA 
22102-5090, (703) 883-4124, TTY (703) 883-4056, or Jane Virga, Senior 
Counsel, Office of General Counsel, Farm Credit Administration, McLean, 
VA 22102-5090, (703) 883-4071, TTY (703) 883-4056.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Farm Credit Administration amended our 
regulations to reflect internal organization changes and to update a 
statutory citation for the Farm Credit Act. In accordance with 12 
U.S.C. 2252, the effective date of the final rule is no earlier than 30 
days from the date of publication in the Federal Register during which 
either or both Houses of Congress are in session. Based on the records 
of the sessions of Congress, the effective date of the regulations is 
January 25, 2016. (12 U.S.C. 2252(a)(9) and (10))

    Dated: January 20, 2016.
Dale L. Aultman,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. 2016-01398 Filed 1-22-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 237 (Monday, December 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63514-63515]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30084]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


DOE Request for an Additional 45 Days to Respond to Defense 
Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 95-2, Safety Management

agency: Department of Energy.

action: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

summary: Section 315(b) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, 
42 U.S.C. 2286d(b) requires the Department of Energy to publish its 
response to Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board recommendations for 
notice and public comment. The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board 
published Recommendation 95-2 concerning Safety Management in the 
Federal Register on October 19, 1995 (60 FR 54065). The Department of 
Energy (DOE) hereby publishes notice of a request for 45-days 
additional time to respond to Recommendation 95-2 as allowed by the 
statute cited above.

dates: Comments, data, views, or arguments concerning the Secretary's 
request are due on or before January 10, 1996.

addresses: Send comments, data, views, or arguments concerning the 
Secretary's response to: Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, 625 
Indiana Avenue, N.W., Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004.

for further information contact: Mr. Peter N. Brush, Principal Deputy, 
Assistant Secretary for Environmental, Safety and Health, Department of 
Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20585.

    Issued in Washington, D.C., on December 1, 1995.
Mark B. Whitaker,
Departmental Representative to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety 
Board.

The Secretary of Energy 

[[Page 63515]]


December 1, 1995.
The Honorable John T. Conway, Chairman,
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, Suite 700, 625 Indiana 
Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20004.

    Dear Chairman Conway: This letter acknowledges receipt of your 
Recommendation 95-2 regarding Safety Management. The issues 
identified in the Recommendation are extensive and may have 
significant impact on many of our existing and developing programs 
and initiatives. Accordingly, the Department will require additional 
time to evaluate fully these cross-cutting issues and their impact 
from both a headquarters and field perspective.
    In accordance with 42 U.S.C. 2286d, the Department requests an 
additional 45 days to respond to Recommendation 95-2. If a 45 day 
extension is granted, the Department will respond to the Board by 
January 17, 1996.

      Sincerely,
Hazel R. O'Leary
[FR Doc. 95-30084 Filed 12-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3380 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3380

 To prohibit the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency 
from retroactively reducing certain determinations under the Renewable 
                 Fuel Program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 14, 2021

Ms. Klobuchar (for herself, Mr. Grassley, Ms. Duckworth, and Ms. Ernst) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
               Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency 
from retroactively reducing certain determinations under the Renewable 
                 Fuel Program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Defend the Blend Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST RETROACTIVE REDUCTIONS OF DETERMINATIONS 
              UNDER THE RENEWABLE FUEL PROGRAM.

    The Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency may not 
reduce any applicable volume determined under paragraph (2) of section 
211(o) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7545(o)), or any renewable fuel 
obligation or applicable percentage determined under paragraph (3) of 
that section, that has already been finalized for a calendar year.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 28 (Friday, February 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 8107]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3346]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster Loan Area #2762]


North Carolina; Declaration of Disaster Loan Area

    Buncombe County and the contiguous Counties of Haywood, Henderson, 
Madison, McDowell, Rutherford, Transylvania, and Yancey in the State of 
North Carolina constitute a disaster area as a result of damages caused 
by severe storms and flooding which occurred on January 14 and 15, 
1995. Applications for loans for physical damage may be filed until the 
close of business on April 3, 1995 and for economic injury until the 
close of business on November 2, 1995 at the address listed below:

U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 2 Office, One 
Baltimore Place, Suite 300, Atlanta, GA 30308

or other locally announced locations.
    The interest rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:                                                    
  Homeowners with credit available elsewhere.................      8.000
  Homeowners without credit available elsewhere..............      4.000
  Businesses with credit available elsewhere.................      8.000
  Businesses and non-profit organizations without credit                
   available elsewhere.......................................      4.000
  Others (including non-profit organizations) with credit               
   available elsewhere.......................................      7.125
For Economic Injury:                                                    
  Businesses and small agricultural cooperatives without                
   credit available elsewhere................................      4.000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 276206 
and for economic injury the number is 844200.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: February 2, 1995.
Philip Lader,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 95-3346 Filed 2-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual Balance 

in 75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

B

7

-1.70% -4.20% 0.75% 1.07% -0.95% 

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2008 Trustees Report Office of the Chief A

July 16, 2008

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Cost-of-Living Adjustment

Proposed Provision: Beginning December 2009, reduce cost-of-living adjustment for OASDpercentage point

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this 

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

0.02.04.06.08.0

10.012.014.016.018.020.0

2008 2018 2028 2038 2048 2058 2068 2078

Year

Percent

Cost rates with this provisionCost rates under present lawIncome rates with this provisionIncome rates under present law

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

 (assets as a percentage of annual expe

0

100200300400500600700800900

1000

2008 2018 2028 2038 2048 2058 

Year

Percent

Present law With this p
1
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CSB Bancorp, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this annual report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Eddie L. SteinerEddie L. SteinerChief Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 10.6
 US $750,000.00
    
    May 22, 2006
 BRIDGE LOAN
PROMISSORY NOTE
 Maker Holder
 Security
 Interest
 Payments Maturity Date
 Guaranty. Guaranty Guarantors Guaranteed
Obligations




---



##### 



Prepayment
 Default Event of
Default
     Collection Costs
 Waiver
 Transfer
 Governing Law
 Representations and Warranties of Maker
   Representations and Warranties of Guarantors
  2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



Holders Address
    
    
    
    Maker:1900 West Loop South
    
    
    
    REMOTE KNOWLEDGE, INC.,Suite 1300
    
    
    
    a Delaware CorporationHouston, TX 77027
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Randy BayneName: Randy BayneGuarantors:
    
    ALAN GRANADER/s/ Alan GranaderDAN GRANADER/s/ Dan GranaderHARRY GRANADER/s/ Harry Granader
 4
Amended Confirmation of Power Sales Transaction



 EXHIBIT 10.06 
  

			
	

	  	 P.O. Box 982
 El Paso, Texas
 79960-0982
 (915) 543-5711


  

			
	Imperial Irrigation District	  	May 8, 2009
	Supply & Trading Section	  	
	1561 W. Main St., Suite 11A	  	
	El Centro, CA 92243	  	

 Amendment No. 3 to the April 18, 2007 Confirmation between El Paso Electric Company and Imperial
Irrigation District 
 This third amended confirmation shall replace and supersede the sections of the April 18, 2007 Confirmation (“Original
Confirmation) titled “Contract Quantity” and “Total Quantity” in their entirety to read as shown below. All other terms and conditions remain as set forth in the Original Confirmation as amended by (i) Amendment Number 1
dated August 29, 2008 and (ii) Amendment Number 2 dated March 31, 2009, thereto. 
  

			
	Contract Quantity:	  	Up to 100 MW of firm capacity (and associated energy) and up to 50 MW of system contingent capacity (and associated energy) In Year 1, Year 2 and through October 31st of Year 3.

		
		  	For the remaining Year 3 period (beginning November 1st, 2009) through April 30th, 2010, up to 100 MW of firm capacity (and associated energy) and up to 40 MW of system
contingent capacity (and associated energy).
		
	Contract Quantity:	  	Up to 3,902,160 MWh

 The signatories below hereto represent that they have been appropriately authorized to enter into this amendment
on behalf of the Party for whom they sign. This Amendment is executed as of the date first written above. 
  

			
	Imperial Irrigation District
		
	By:	 	/s/ Brian J. Brady
	Name: Brian J. Brady
	Title: General Manager
	
	El Paso Electric Company
		
	By:	 	/s/ Steven Buraczyk
	Name: Steven Buraczyk
	Title: Vice President
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Family Members | Description of Proposed Provision:      Beginning in 2010, continue benefits for children of disabled or deceased workers until age 22 if the child is in high school, college or vocational school. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2009 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified November 4, 2009 |
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATE OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant
to Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code

The undersigned, being the Principal Executive Officer of Enbridge Energy
Partners, L.P. (the Partnership), hereby certifies that the Partnerships Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (the Annual Report), filed with the United States Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), as amended, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and that the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



|                        |  |     |  |                                                                                                                                               
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 18, 2010 |  | By: |  | /S/    MARK A.
MAKI                                                                                                                           
|                        |  |     |  | Mark A. Maki Vice
President, Finance (Principal Financial Officer) Enbridge Energy Management, L.L.C. (as delegate of the General Partnership)
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 7880** 

JOHNIE NORMAN, JR. , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. GENE M. JOHNSON , Respondent

– Appellee, and COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Respondent
.

Appeal from the Un ited States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Liam O’Grady , District Judge. ( 1:09

- cv - 00131

- LO

- IDD )

Submitted : October 12 , 2010 Decided: November 1 2 , 2010

Before NIEMEYER and DAVIS , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, S enior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Johnie Norman, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Bidwell Theisen, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent i n this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Johnie Norman, Jr. seeks to appeal the district
court ’ s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies
t his standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. a t 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Norman has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We also deny Norman’s motions to appoint counsel, to schedule or al argument, and to conduct en banc argument. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal4 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSE D
#### Judith M. Panichi et al., Respondents, v Financial Services Vehicle Trust, Defendant, and Lawrence E. Fabian et al., Appellants.

[774 NYS2d 748]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Lawrence E. Fabian and Franeine Fabian appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Lifson, J.), dated February 25, 2003, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the ground that the plaintiff Judith M. Panichi did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The appellants made a prima facie showing that the injured plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject motor vehicle accident *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955 [1992]). However, the affirmations of the injured plaintiffs physicians submitted in opposition to the appellants’ motion were sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether she sustained a serious injury.

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the appellants’ motion. Altman, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Mastro, JJ., concur.