alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### N. B. JOSEY COMPANY v. MRS. KATIE L. YARBORO and O. Y. YARBORO.

(Filed 12 October, 1927.)

Appeal by Katie L. Yarboro from *Grady, J.,*and a jury, at March Term, 1927, of Halifax.

No error.

Tbe following are tbe issues submitted to tbe jury and their answers thereto:

“1. Did Mrs. Kate L. Yarboro endorse tbe note for $3,445, made by O. Y. Yarboro to tbe plaintiff, upon the promise of N. B. Josey that be would discount her four notes, each in tbe sum of $5,000, secured by a deed of trust on lands in Franklin County, as alleged in tbe answer? Answer: No.

“2. At tbe time of tbe delivery to tbe plaintiff of tbe $20,000 notes, referred to in tbe first issue, did tbe plaintiff agree in consideration thereof that it would cancel and surrender to tbe defendants tbe $10,000 note made by Mrs. Kate L. Yarboro to E. H. Malone, and assigned by O. Y. Yarboro to tbe plaintiff, as alleged in tbe answer? Answer: No.

“3. After tbe plaintiff failed to discount said $20,000 worth of notes, did tbe plaintiff agree to release tbe $10,000 note and deed of trust, and thereby restore tbe defendants to tbe same position that they occupied before tbe execution of tbe said $10,000 note? Answer: No.”

Judgment by tbe court below was duly rendered on the issues. Defendant Katie L. Yarboro made numerous exceptions and assignments of error and'appealed to tbe Supreme Court.

*Travis & Travis and Ashby Dunn for plaintiff.*

*Ben T. Holden, W. H. Yarborough and White & Malone for defendants.*

*797Pee Otjeiam.

Tbe record discloses tbat tbe charge of tbe court below covers nineteen pages. In tbe charge each issue was read to tbe jury and tbe contentions of tbe parties carefully given on same and tbe law applicable. ¥e can discover no error in tbe charge nor in tbe admission or exclusion of evidence. In tbe nineteen pages of tbe charge of tbe court below tbe “specific” exceptions to tbe charge are not set forth.

“We have no power here except to ‘review upon appeal any decision of tbe courts below, *upon, any matter of law or legal inference.’*Const. . of N. C., part Art. IY, sec. 8.” *Rawls v. Lupton,*193 N. C., p. 428.

It may be noted tbat no legal authorities are cited in tbe briefs of tbe learned counsel for plaintiff or defendant. Tbe facts as found by tbe jury were in favor of plaintiff and against tbe defendant.. On tbe record we can find

No error.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 32 (Thursday, February 16, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 8932]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3770]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[TD 8580]
RIN 1545-AN06


Disposition of an Interest in a Nuclear Power Plant; Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Correction to final regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains corrections to the final regulations 
(TD 8580), which was published in the Federal Register for Tuesday, 
December 27, 1994 (59 FR 66471). The final regulation relates to 
certain Federal income tax consequences of a disposition of an interest 
in a nuclear power plant by a taxpayer that has maintained a nuclear 
decommissioning fund with respect to that plant.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 27, 1994.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter C. Friedman, (202) 622-3110 (not 
a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The final regulations that are the subject of these corrections are 
under section 468A of the Internal Revenue Code.

Need for Correction

    As published, TD 8580 contains errors which may prove to be 
misleading and are in need of clarification.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication of final regulations (TD 8580), which 
were the subject of FR Doc. 94-31428, is corrected as follows:


Sec. 1.468A-3  [Corrected]

    1. On page 66474, column 1, preceding Sec. 1.468A-3, in 
instructional ``Par. 4.'', paragraph 2a is added immediately following 
the text of paragraph 2 to read as follows:
    2a. In newly designated paragraph (h)(1)(vi), the reference 
``paragraph (h)(1)(viii)'' is removed and ``paragraph (h)(1)(vii)'' is 
added in its place.


Sec. 1.468A-5  [Corrected]

    2. On page 66474, column 2, preceding Sec. 1.468A-5, in 
instructional ``Par. 5.'', paragraph 3a is added immediately following 
the text of paragraph 3 to read as follows:
    3a. In newly designated paragraph (b)(2)(vii) introductory text, 
the reference ``paragraph (b)(2)(vi)'' is removed from the last 
sentence and ``paragraph (b)(2)(vii)'' is added in its place.
Dale D. Goode,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate).
[FR Doc. 95-3770 Filed 2-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-U
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 32 (Thursday, February 16, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9043-9044]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3945]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[PRT-798823]


Receipt of Application(s) for Permit

    The following applicant has applied for a permit to conduct certain 
activities with endangered species. This notice is provided pursuant to 
Section 10(c) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 
U.S.C., Et. Seq.).

Applicant: Dr. Robert Hershler, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, 
DC.

    [[Page 9044]] The applicant requests a permit to include take 
activities for the Alamosa springsnial (Tryonia alamosae) for the 
purpose of scientific research and enhancement of propagation and 
survival of the species as prescribed by Service recovery documents.

ADDRESSES: Written data or comments should be submitted to the 
Assistant Regional Director, Ecological Services, U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 1306, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87103, and 
must be received by the Assistant Regional Director within 30 days from 
the date of this publication.
    Documents and other information submitted with this application are 
available for new review, subject to the requirements of the Privacy 
Act and Freedom of Information Act, by any party who submits a written 
request for a copy of such documents to the above office within 30 days 
of the date of publication of this notice. (See ADDRESSES above.)
Susan MacMullin,
Acting Regional Director, Region 2.
[FR Doc. 95-3945 Filed 2-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-M
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3574 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

303 East Mississippi Avenue in Elwood, Illinois, as the Lawrence M. 

‘‘Larry’’ Walsh Sr. Post Office. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2022 

Mr. DURBIN (for himself and Ms. DUCKWORTH) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 303 East Mississippi Avenue in Elwood, Illinois, as the Lawrence M. ‘‘Larry’’ Walsh Sr. Post Office. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LAWRENCE M. ‘‘LARRY’’ WALSH SR. POST OF4 FICE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 303 East Mississippi Avenue in 

7 Elwood, Illinois, shall be known and designated as the 

8 ‘‘Lawrence M. ‘Larry’ Walsh Sr. Post Office’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3574 IS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lawrence M. ‘Larry’ 

5 Walsh Sr. Post Office’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 32 (Thursday, February 16, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9075]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3902]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration


Environmental Impact Statement: Sauk County, Wisconsin

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.

ACTION: Withdrawal of Notice of Intent to prepare an Environmental 
Impact Statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FHWA is issuing this notice to advise the public that an 
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) will not be prepared for the 
proposed improvement of USH 141 between Abrams and STH 22 in Oconto 
County, Wisconsin.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Richard C. Madrzak, Statewide Projects Engineer, Federal Highway 
Administration, 4502 Vernon Boulevard, Madison, Wisconsin 53705-4905. 
Telephone (608) 264-5968.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FHWA, in cooperation with the Wisconsin 
Department of Transportation, is withdrawing the notice of intent to 
prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the construction of a 
four lane facility for Highway 141. The project beings at the 
intersection with CTH ``E'' near Abrams and extends northerly to LeMere 
Road approximately one mile north of STH 22 in the central section of 
Oconto County. The proposed project consists of adding two lanes to the 
existing facility, which will be accomplished by constructing four 
lanes on new location or a combination of new location and added lanes 
to the existing location. The project will serve to reduce heavy 
congestion and the accident potential along the existing route.
    Initial review of the subject project indicated the possibility of 
having a significant impact on one or more environmental resources. In 
accordance with the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act 
(NEPA), an intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement was 
filed. Through the course of the project scoping process and 
investigation of the potential impacts, no significant impacts were 
identified. An Environmental Assessment (EA) was prepared and a public 
hearing was held for the project; Based on the findings of the 
Environmental Assessment, including sufficient analysis to determine 
that an Environmental Impact Statement is not required, A Finding of No 
Significant Impact (FONSI) was prepared and approved. Therefore, the 
intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement is withdrawn.
    Comments or questions concerning this action should be directed to 
FHWA at the address provided above.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205, 
Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing 
Executive Order 112372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on 
Federal programs and activities apply to this program.

    Issued February 6, 1995.
Richard C. Madrzak,
Statewide Projects Engineer, Madison, Wisconsin.
[FR Doc. 95-3902 Filed 2-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-M
## Detailed Single Year Tables

- Individual Provisions
- Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable)

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						E1.2: Increase the payroll tax rate (currently 12.4 percent) to 16.2 percent in 2034-2063, and to 20.0 percent in years 2064 and later.**

### Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program

### Summarized Estimates
MEMORANDUMSeptember 10, 2003Estimated Long-Range OASDI Financial Effect of a Proposal Developed by Representative Nick SmithList of Attached TablesAssumed Worker Participation Rate in Personal Retirement Savings Accounts0%67%100%Plan provisions and estimates of the effect of each provision, and the effect of all provisions combined, on the long-range actuarial balance. Table ATable BFinancial Effects of the ProposalTable 1Table 2Table 3Trust Fund Asset Comparison and PRSA InformationTable 1aTable 2aTable 3aIA/Annuity Assets, PRSA Contributions and PRSA Disbursement Under Three Sensitivity Illustrations Table 2a1Table 3a1PRSA Contributions, Offsets to OASDI Trust Funds from PRSAs, and Budget EffectsTable 1bTable 2bTable 3bCash Flow from the General Fund of the Treasury to the OASDI Trust Funds--Constant 2003 DollarsTable 1cTable 2cTable 3c
Return to memorandumReturn to List of Solvency Memos
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 247 (Tuesday, December 26, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 66822]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31230]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Public Information Collection Requirements Submitted to OMB for 
Review

December 11, 1995.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Public Law 96-511. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.
    Special Request: In order to conduct the survey described below in 
a timely manner, the Department of Treasury is requesting Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) review and approval of this information 
collection by December 22, 1995. To obtain a copy of this information 
collection, please write to the IRS Clearance Officer at the address 
listed below.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-1349.
    Project Number: SOI-15.
    Type of Review: Revision.
    Title: 1996 Filing Season Written TeleFile Survey.
    Description: This request is for a mail out/mail back survey to 
obtain more detailed information from taxpayers who use TeleFile than 
the automated survey can obtain.
    Respondents: Individuals or households.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 2,800.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 10 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: Other.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 467 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear, (202) 622-3869, Internal Revenue 
Service, Room 5571, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Milo Sunderhauf, (202) 395-7340, Office of Management 
and Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 
20503.
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-31230 Filed 12-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24

- 1247

In re: CURTIS SHAWN BROOKS , Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro

. ( 1:19

- cr - 00393

- LCB

- 1 )

Submitted : May 21, 2024 Decided: May 24, 2024

Before WYNN and BENJAMIN , Circuit Judges , and KEENAN , Senior Circuit Judge

.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
Curtis Shawn Brooks, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-1247 Doc: 12 Filed: 05/24/2024 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
Curtis Shawn Brooks petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals
that the district court denied the § 2255 motion on April 25, 2024. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Brooks’ case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and lega l contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED USCA4 Appeal: 24-1247 Doc: 12 Filed: 05/24/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
#### ROSE THOMPSON v. DORIS STADIEM, ABRAHAM STADIEM, JACOB STADIEM, and C. C. EDWARDS, Trustee.

(Filed 14 December, 1955.)

Cancellation and Rescission of Instruments § 12—

Evidence in tbis action by a blind and poorly educated woman to rescind contract of purchase and sale of real property and to recover damages for fraud, *7held*sufficient to be submitted to the jury, and further, there being no evidence that plaintiff made any payments on the mortgage executed by her after she discovered that the house was not properly underpinned and had not passed city inspection as represented, there was no sufficient evidence of ratification to bar recovery.

Appeal by defendants from *Hall, Special J.,*April Term, 1955, Durham.

Civil action to rescind contract of purchase and sale of real property and to recover damages.

The jury answered the issues submitted by the court in favor of the plaintiff. There was judgment on the verdict and defendants appealed.

*Blackioell M. Brogden for plaintiff appellee.*

*J. Grover Lee and Frazier & Frazier for defendant appellants.*

Per Curiam.

After a careful examination of the record we are constrained to hold that the plaintiff offered sufficient evidence to require the submission of issues to a jury. We have here a blind, poorly educated woman who “Brailled” the house in an attempt to ascertain its condition, on the one hand, and an experienced real estate dealer, on the other. There is no evidence that the plaintiff made any payment on the mortgage she executed after she discovered that the house was not properly underpinned and had not passed city inspection as repre*292sented. Hence, there is no sufficient evidence of ratification to bar plaintiff’s recovery.

The judgment entered in the court below is

Affirmed.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00073-CV

In re Keith Russell Judd

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relator Keith Russell Judd, an inmate in federal prison, has filed a pro se petition for

writ of mandamus, asking this Court to order the district court to produce a copy of the record in the

underlying lawsuit that Judd has filed against the Texas Secretary of State and the Democratic Party

of the State of Texas. Judd asserts that he needs a copy of the record for use as an “appendix” in

another petition for writ of mandamus, this one relating to the district court’s alleged failure to rule

on his various motions for default judgment and summary judgment in the underlying suit.1

Judd has failed to establish that he is entitled to the extraordinary relief

requested. See Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-44 (Tex. 1992); Barnes v. State, 832 S.W.2d

424, 426 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding); see also In re Hernandez,

No. 03-13-00002-CV, 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 569, at *1-5 (Tex. App.—Austin Jan. 17, 2013,

Judd has previously filed at least two petitions for writ of mandamus related to the 1

district court’s alleged failure to rule in the underlying suit, both of which this Court has denied. See

In re Judd, No. 03-12-00617-CV, 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 10204, at *1-2 (Tex. App.—Austin

Dec. 17, 2012, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.); In re Judd, No. 03-11-00690-CV, 2011 Tex. App.

LEXIS, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Nov. 16, 2011, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.).
orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R.

App. P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Rose

Filed: February 27, 2013

2
<PAGE>   1


                                   EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation of our report on the consolidated
financial statements of Quantech, Ltd., dated September 12, 2001, which contains
an emphasis paragraph relating to an uncertainty as to the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern and is included in this Form 10-KSB, into the
previously filed Registration Statements of Quantech, Ltd., on Form S-8 (No.
333-46914, No. 333-70499, and No. 333-11475), and on the related Prospectuses.

                                       /s/ McGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP



Minneapolis, Minnesota
September 28, 2001
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 15, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 8770]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3949]



      


                Sunshine Act Meetings



Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 1995 / 
Sunshine Act Meetings
[[Page 8770]] 




U.S. CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, February 15, 1995.

LOCATION: Room 420, East West Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, 
Maryland.

STATUS: Open to the Public.

Matter to be Considered:

Toy Labeling/Reporting Requirements

    The Commission will consider final labeling and reporting 
requirements that would implement the Child Safety Protection Act of 
1994.

    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-0709.

CONTACT PERSON FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Sadye E. Dunn, Office of the 
Secretary, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20207, (301) 504-0800.

    Dated: February 9, 1995.
Sadye E. Dunn,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95-3949 Filed 2-13-95; 12:42 pm]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-M
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual Balance 

in 75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

-2.00% -4.34% 0.29% 0.43% -1.71% -3.91%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2009 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary, Social Security

August 26, 2009

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Level of Monthly Benefits (PIA)

Proposed Provision: Increase the number of years used to calculate benefits for retirees and survivors 

(but not for disabled workers) from 35 to 38, phased in 2010-2014.

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this provision

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Year

Percent

Cost rates with this provision

Cost rates under present law

Income rates with this provision

Income rates under present law

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

 (assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Year

Percent

Present law With this provision
|CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-87908, 333-18347, 333-55821,
333-57580, 333-115719 and 333-144727) of our reports dated March 4, 2009, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements of Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc. and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Palomar Medical
Technologies, Inc., included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December
31, 2008.
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                      |                      
|--------------------- | ---------------------
|
|                      | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|Boston, Massachusetts |                      
|March 4, 2009         |                      

|
|