alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Biomoda,  Inc.,
("the  Company")  for the  quarter  ended  September  30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  ("the  Report"),  I, John
Cousins,  Chief  Executive and Financial  Officer of the Company hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




                                 By: /s/John J. Cousins
                                     ------------------
                                     John J. Cousins
                                     Executive Vice President
                                     (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)

                                     November 14, 2005


   A signed original of this written statement required by section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 9, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 6853]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02498]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER16-853-000 ]


Enterprise Solar, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Enterprise Solar, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes 
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is February 23, 2016.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the 
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an 
eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive 
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). 
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d3959681909cbdbfbabdb680a6a3a3bca1a793b5b6a1b0fdb4bca5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="460003140509282a2f282315333636293432062023342568212930">[email protected]</span></a>. or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: February 3, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-02498 Filed 2-8-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JA NUARY 17, 2014

NO. 03
- 13
- 00575
- CV

Longhorn Junction Land & Cattle, LLC, Gregory Hall and Bruce Barton, Appellant s

v. George Garver, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 277TH DISTRICT CO URT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GO ODWIN, AND FIELD DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION
-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgme nt signed by the tr i a l court on June 26, 2013

. The parties have
filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the Court agrees that the motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismisses the

app eal

. E ach party shall bear their own costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the
court below

.
#### Louis Barbieri, Appellant, v Bridge Funding, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[772 NYS2d 610]

*415In an action, inter alia, to recover interest paid on an allegedly usurious loan pursuant to General Obligations Law article 5, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LaTorella, J.), dated July 10, 2002, which granted that branch of the motion of the defendant Bridge Funding, Inc., which was to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it pursuant to CPLR 3211, granted those branches of the separate motion of the defendant Madison Home Equities, Inc., which were for leave to amend its answer and to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it pursuant to CPLR 3211, granted the separate cross motion of the defendant St. Nicholas Capital Funding for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it, and denied his cross motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

Under the doctrine of res judicata, a disposition on the merits bars litigation between the same parties or those in privity with them of a cause of action arising out of the same transaction or series of transactions as a cause of action that either was raised or could have been raised in the prior action *(see Ciancimino v Town of E. Hampton,*266 AD2d 331, 332 [1999]; *McNeary v Senecal,*197 AD2d 835, 836 [1993]). Here, the plaintiff was in privity with the parties in prior actions *(see Green v Santa Fe Indus.,*70 NY2d 244, 254 [1987]; *Watts v Swiss Bank Corp.,*27 NY2d 270, 277 [1970]; *Matter of Slocum v Joseph B.,*183 AD2d 102, 104-105 [1992]), and the plaintiffs claims were raised or could have been raised in the prior actions which were disposed of on the merits.

In light of our determination, we do not reach the plaintiffs remaining contentions. Prudenti, P.J., Altman, Luciano and Adams, JJ., concur.
#### Henry W. Sharpless and another. Respondents, v. Walter K Lits and another, Appellants.

Judgment and order affirmed as to Lite and reversed as to Kitchell and new trial directed, without costs. Opinion by

Daniels, J.
1 The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United St ates District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 04-3943

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. William J. Dixon, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: December 7, 2005 Filed: December 29, 2005

___________ Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. William J. Dixon appeals the 108-month prison sentence the district court 1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a firearm as a previously convicted felon. See18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(a)(2) (10-year maximum prison term). He maintains that the districtcourt violated Blakely v. Washington , 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), by enhancing his sentence base d on judge-found facts. The government argues that the appeal should be dismisse d, noting that Dixon executed a written plea agreement in which he specifi cally waived his right to “appeal or otherwise challenge-2- the constitutionality or legality of the Sent encing Guidelines,” and generally agreed not to appeal his sentence on any ground unl ess the sentencing court departed upward or imposed “a sentence in excess of the st atutory maximum” or “in violation of law apart from the Sentencing Guidelines.”
We enforce this appeal waiver. At th e guilty-plea hearing, the district court discussed the waiver with Dixon, ensuri ng that Dixon was pleading guilty voluntarily, and Dixon does not challenge the validity of the plea ag reement on appeal. The constitutional challenge falls within the sc ope of the waiver, and no miscarriage of justice would result from enforcing the waiver. See United States v. Andis , 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir.) (e n banc), cert. denied , 540 U.S. 997 (2003). Dixon offers two arguments to avoid the appeal waiv er: first, that his pre-Blakely plea agreement could not have waived “rights that he didn’t know existed prior to the Blakely decision,” and second, that his appeal is permitted by the waiver’s language, as the challenged enhancements – which were based on judge -found facts – resulted in a sentence “in violation of law apart from the Sentencing Gu idelines” and “in excess of the statutory maximum” under Blakely . Both arguments are unavailing. See United States v. Young , 413 F.3d 727, 729-30 (8th Cir. 2005) (where pre-Blakely agreement stated “defendant agrees not to appeal or othe rwise challenge the constitutionality or legality of the Sentencing Guidelines,” holding that Blakely challenge to sentencing enhancements made pursuant to judge-found facts came within waiver’s scope; also rejecting argument that after Blakely , top of Guidelines range constitutes “statutory maximum”).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

______________________________
James
Stafford




James Stafford


Chartered
Accountants


Suite 350
- 1111 Melville Street


Vancouver,
British Columbia


Canada
V6E 3V6


Telephone
+1 604 669 0711


Facsimile
+1 604 669 0754




*
Incorporated professional, James Stafford, Inc.














Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm






We
consent to the incorporation of our report dated 22 December 2008,
with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Sidewinder Explorations
Inc. (the "Company") as at 31 October 2008 and 2007, and the
related statements of operations, cash flows and changes in
stockholders’ deficiency for the year ended 31 October 2008 and
for the period from the date of inception on 7 December 2006 to 31 September
2007 in the Form 10-K of the Compoany dated 9 January 2009.






/s/ James Stafford


Chartered
Accountants







Vancouver,
Canada





9 January
2009
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Meditecnic, Inc. (the "Company") on Form  10-QSB for the quarter  ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof  (the "Report"),  I, Bernard Arbalet, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Bernard Arbalet

By: Bernard Arbalet

Chief Executive  Officer

December 15, 2008
Exhibit 4.2



 


Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm


We have issued our report
dated December 13, 2022, with respect to the financial statement of Advisors Disciplined Trust 2143 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the
Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-268163) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in
the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Experts”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


December 13, 2022
#### Ann L. Converso, as Executrix of Donald A. Converso, Deceased, Respondent, v Sears, Roebuck & Co., Appellant.

[773 NYS2d 685]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Joseph R. Glownia, J.), entered April 12, 2003. The order removed the action to Buffalo City Court.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Erie County, for further proceedings on the complaint.

Memorandum: We agree with defendant that Supreme Court abused its discretion in sua sponte removing this action to City Court pursuant to CPLR 325 (d) and 22 NYCRR 202.13 (e) *(see Gair Co. v Cambridge Carpet,*160 AD2d 371 [1990]). We therefore reverse the order and remit the matter to Supreme Court for further proceedings on the complaint. Present—Wisner, J.P., Hurlbutt, Kehoe, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.
Exhibit 99.2


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, David Jacoby, Chief Financial Officer (principal accounting officer) of
Associated Automotive Group Incorporated (the "Registrant"), certify to the best
of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
the period ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") of the Registrant, that:

    (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

    (2)  The information contained in the Report, fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Registrant.


                                                 By:/s/ David Jacoby
                                                    ---------------------
                                                    David Jacoby
                                                    Date: August 23, 2002
#### JOHN L. COX et Ux v. J. W. JOHNSON et Ux.

(Filed 11 December, 1946.)

Fraud §

The law will not permit one to predicate an action for fraud upon a representation which he knows to be false, for he cannot be deceived by that which he knows.

Appeal by plaintiffs from *Nettles, J.,*at May Term, 1946, of Guil-ford — (High Point Division).

Civil action- for fraud in the sale of land.

There is allegation and evidence tending to show that plaintiffs purchased a 13-acre farm near High Point from the defendants, known as Crisco Farm, taking deed therefor on 26 October, 1945, with assurances from the male defendant that it had a tobacco allotment of 9.4 acres; wdiereas in fact the allotment had been reduced to 7.9 acres to the knowledge of the defendant. The defendant claimed that he did not know of the reduction, but plaintiffs’ evidence is to the contrary.

The plaintiff offered as a witness the defendants’ tenant in 1945, Eli Nelson, who testified as follows: “The plaintiff in this case came to me along in September and discussed with me the tobacco allotment on the place. I say it was the middle of September on up until he bought it. He was down there different times. I reckon we discussed it five or six times. I told him more than once that the acreage had been reduced. He said that was all right, that he would fix that. ... As well as I remember, that was about October 6th. I told him then and there it had been reduced an acre and a half. ... I said there is an acre and a half that has been moved but Mr. Johnson denies it, and he said he did not know anything about it. . . . That was before Mr. Oox bought the place.” *

From judgment of nonsuit entered at the close of plaintiff’s evidence, he appeals, assigning errors.

*70
      *James B. Lovelace for plaintiffs, appellants.*

*Y orle é Dichson for defendants, appellees.*

Stacy, C. J.

If it be conceded that the representation in respect of the tobacco allotment was false and was made with knowledge of its falsity, or with reckless disregard of its truth or falsity, and with intent to deceive, nevertheless it appears from plaintiff’s own evidence that he knew of the reduction in the tobacco allotment before purchasing the land. The law will not permit one to predicate an action for fraud upon a representation which he knows to be false, for he cannot be deceived by that which he knows. *Harding v. Ins. Co.,*218 N. C., 129, 10 S. E. (2d), 599; *Tarault v. Seip,*158 N. C., 363, 74 S. E., 3; *Williamson v. Holt,*147 N. C., 515, 61 S. E., 384, 17 L. R. A. (N. S.), 240; *Hart v. Newland,*10 N. C., 122; 23 Am. Jur., 942.

No error has been made to appear in the judgment of nonsuit. It will therefore be upheld.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3451 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.3451

                    One Hundred Seventeenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and twenty two

                                 An Act

 
 To include certain computer-related projects in the Federal permitting 
    program under title XLI of the FAST Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. FEDERAL PERMITTING IMPROVEMENT.
    Section 41001(6)(A) of the FAST Act (42 U.S.C. 4370m(6)(A)) is 
amended, in the matter preceding clause (i), by inserting 
``semiconductors, artificial intelligence and machine learning, high-
performance computing and advanced computer hardware and software, 
quantum information science and technology, data storage and data 
management, cybersecurity,'' after ``manufacturing,''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
## Detailed Single Year Tables

- Individual Provisions
- Level of Monthly Benefits

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						B7.2: Reduce benefits by 5 percent for those newly eligible for benefits in 2024 and later.**

### Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program

### Summarized Estimates
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           8,497
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           5,456
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    233,849
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        835,710
<ALLOWANCE>                                     12,250
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,141,397
<DEPOSITS>                                     791,843
<SHORT-TERM>                                   164,033
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             11,377
<LONG-TERM>                                    122,996
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,256
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,162
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,141,397
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 39,703
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                6,551
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   257
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                46,511
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              21,665
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,283
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           16,228
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    2,410
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  71
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 28,204
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,031
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       5,031
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,717
<EPS-BASIC>                                       3.76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.76
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    9.35
<LOANS-NON>                                      7,192
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 2,883
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                11,114
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    2,170
<RECOVERIES>                                       896
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               12,250
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            12,250
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         12,250


</TABLE>