alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 249 (Thursday, December 28, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 67127]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31440]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-85-000]


Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

December 21, 1995.
    Take notice that on December 15, 1996, Tennessee Gas Pipeline 
Company tendered for filing as part of its Fifth Revised FERC Gas 
Tariff the following tariff sheets to become effective February 1, 
1996.

Fifth Revised Sheet No. 20
Ninth Revised Sheet No. 21A
Fourteenth Revised Sheet No. 22
Ninth Revised Sheet No. 22A
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 23
Second Revised Sheet No. 23A
Original Sheet No. 23B
Original Sheet No. 23C
Thirteenth Revised Sheet No. 24
Seventh Revised Sheet No. 25
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 26B
Second Revised Sheet No. 660
First Revised Sheet No. 660A
First Revised Sheet No. 660B
Third Revised Sheet No. 661
Second Revised Sheet No. 663
Second Revised Sheet No. 666A
First Revised Sheet No. 669A
Second Revised Sheet No. 670
Third Revised Sheet No. 671
First Revised Sheet No. 671A
Third Revised Sheet No. 673
Third Revised Sheet No. 674
Second Revised Sheet No. 674A

    Tennessee states that the purpose of the filing is to recover gas 
supply realignment costs (GSR cost) paid or known and measurable at the 
time of the filing, consistent with the GSR cost recovery provisions 
reflected in Section XXVI of the General Terms and Conditions of 
Tennessee's Fifth Revised FERC Gas Tariff. The charges include a GSR 
demand surcharge applicable to firm customers, a separately stated 
Canadian demand charge component, and a unit GSR component applicable 
to Tennessee's interruptible services.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C 20426, 
in accordance with Secs. 385.314 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. Pursuant to Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations, all such motions or protests must be filed not later than 
12 days after the date of filing noted above. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file with the 
Commission a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file 
with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the 
Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-31440 Filed 12-27-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.2
                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO\
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report of Motor Cars Auto Group
Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Barry Tenzer, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: March 17, 2004

/s/ Barry Tenzer
---------------------------
Barry Tenzer
Principal Financial Officer
# TOC

# II.D1

# II.D2

# II.D3

# II.D4

# II.D5

# II.D6

# II.D7 & IV.B3

# II.D8 & VI.E2

# II.D9 & IV.B4

# IV.A1

# IV.B1

# IV.B2

# V.C1

# V.C2

# V.C3

# V.C4

# V.C5

# V.C6

# VI.E1

# VI.E3

# VI.E4

# VI.G1

# image5.png

# image6.png

# image7.png

# image8.png

# image9.png

# image1.png

# image10.png

# image11.png

# image12.png

# image13.png

# image14.png

# image15.png

# image16.png

# image17.png

# image18.png

# image19.png

# image2.png

# image20.png

# image21.png

# image22.png

# image3.png

# image4.png

# image23.png

# image24.png

# image25.png

# image26.png

# image27.png

# image28.png

# image29.png

# image30.png

# image31.png

# image32.png

# image33.png

# image34.png

# image35.png

# image36.png

# image37.png

# image38.png

# image39.png

# image40.png

# image41.png

# image42.png

# image43.png

# image44.png
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.51


October 1, 1997




Mr. William F. Behm
12180 King Road
Roswell, GA 30075

Dear Mr. Behm:

Scientific Games Inc. (formerly known as Scientific Games Operating Corp. and
hereinafter referred to as the "Company") and William F. Behm (the "Executive")
are parties to that certain Employment Agreement dated as of October 1, 1991, as
amended by that certain letter agreement dated August 23, 1993 (collectively,
the "Agreement"). Terms defined in the Agreement and not otherwise defined
herein, when used in this letter agreement, shall have the respective meanings
provided for in the Agreement. Anything in the Agreement to the contrary
notwithstanding, the Company and Executive hereby agree as follows:

1.   The Term of Employment shall extend to and through September 30, 2000.

To acknowledge your agreement with the provisions of this letter, please sign a
counterpart of this letter in the space below and return it to me.

                                        Very truly yours,

                                        SCIENTIFIC GAMES INC.

                                        By: /s/ William G. Malloy
                                            ---------------------
                                            William G. Malloy
                                            President and Chief
                                            Executive Officer



Accepted and Agreed:



/s/ William F. Behm
-------------------
William F. Behm
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual Balance 

in 75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

B

7

-1.70% -4.20% 2.30% 7.18% 0.60% 

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2008 Trustees Report Office of the Chief A

July 16, 2008

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Level of Monthly Benefits (PIA)

Proposed Provision: Beginning with those newly eligible for OASDI benefits in 2015 and latformula factors so that benefits grow by inflation rather than by increases in real wages

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this 

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

0.02.04.06.08.0

10.012.014.016.018.020.0

2008 2018 2028 2038 2048 2058 2068 2078

Year

Percent

Cost rates with this provisionCost rates under present lawIncome rates with this provisionIncome rates under present law

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

 (assets as a percentage of annual expe

0

100200300400500600700800900

1000

2008 2018 2028 2038 2048 2058 

Year

Percent

Present law With this p
### Proposed Provision: B5.6. Beginning for those newly eligible in 2024, reconfigure the special minimum benefit: (a) A year of coverage is defined to be either a year in which 4 quarters of coverage are earned or a child is in care. Childcare years are granted to parents who have a child under 6, with a limit of 5 such years. (b) At implementation, set the PIA for 30 years of coverage equal to 100 percent of the monthly poverty level (about $1,215 in 2023). For those with under 30 years of coverage, the PIA per year of coverage over 10 years is $1,215/20 = $60.75. (c) From 2023 to the year of implementation, 2024, index the PIA per year of coverage using the CPI index. Then, for later years, index the PIA per year of coverage by wage growth for successive cohorts. (d) Scale work requirements for disabled workers, based on the number of years of non-disabled potential work.
**Exhibit 23.01**
**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**
     We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statements No. 333-56979, 333-07391, 333-18563and 333-28789 of Fisher Scientific International Inc. onForms S-8 of our report dated March 2, 2004 (which reportexpresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatoryparagraph relating to a change in method of accounting forgoodwill and intangible assets in 2002), appearing in this Annual Reporton Form 10-K of Fisher Scientific International Inc. forthe year ended December 31, 2003.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP     
New York, New YorkMarch 8, 2004
##### 



EXHIBIT 11.1
 COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

(unaudited)
 Three Months EndedJanuary 31,2006
    
    2007Numerator:Net (loss)
    
    $
    (830,884
    )
    
    $
    (1,136,155
    )Denominator:Denominator
for basic earnings per share
weighted-average shares
    
    
    14,049,760
    
    
    
    14,262,176Effect of dilutive securities:Employee stock options
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Denominator for diluted earnings per share
adjusted weighted-average shares and assumed
conversions
    
    
    14,049,760
    
    
    
    14,262,176Basic and diluted (loss) per share:Basic and diluted (loss) per share
    
    $
    (0.06
    )
    
    $
    (0.08
    )
 20
## Summary of Provisions That Would Change             the Social Security Program

- Office of the Chief Actuary
- Individual Provisions

Printer-friendly Version
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 240 (Thursday, December 14, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 64135]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30509]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[AK6-1-6587; FRL-5345-7]


State Implementation Plan: Alaska; Withdrawal

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Due to an adverse comment, EPA is withdrawing the effective 
date for the approval of a moderate nonattainment area state 
implementation plan revision for Anchorage, Alaska, submitted by the 
Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation for the purpose of 
implementing an oxygenated gasoline program in the Municipality of 
Anchorage. The original action was published in the Federal Register on 
October 24, 1995, as a direct final rule. 60 FR 54435. As stated in the 
Federal Register notice, if adverse or critical comments were received 
by November 24, 1995, the effective date would be delayed and timely 
notice would be published in the Federal Register. Therefore, due to 
receiving an adverse comment within the comment period, EPA is 
withdrawing the final rule and will address the comments received in a 
subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule also published on 
October 24, 1995. 60 FR 54465. EPA will not institute a second comment 
period on this document.

DATES: This withdrawal notice is effective December 14, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Montel Livingston, Office of Air (AT-
082), EPA, Region 10, 1200 6th Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101, (206-553-
0180).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: See the information provided in the direct 
final rule located in the final rules section of the October 24, 1995 
Federal Register, and in the short informational notice located in the 
proposed rule section of the October 24, 1995 Federal Register.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 
Hydrocarbons, Incorporation by reference, Ozone, and Volatile organic 
compounds.

    Dated: December 7, 1995.
Chuck Clarke,
Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 95-30509 Filed 12-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

February 5, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00841

- CV

PILOT TRAVEL CENTERS LLC

, Appellant

v.

Norma GUTIERREZ

, Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Co urt, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- CV

- 000054

- D1 The Honorable Joe Lopez, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal. Appellant’s brief was originally due on January 6, 2014. We granted appellant an extension until January 23, 2014 to file the brief. Neither the brief nor a

motion for extension of time has been filed.

We, therefore, ORDER Pilot Travel Centers LLC to file, on or before February 25,

2014

, its appellant’s brief and a written response re asonably explaining (1) its failure to timely file the brief and (2) why appellee is not signi ficant ly injured by appellant ’s failu re to timely file

a brief. Alternatively, Pilot Travel Centers LLC may file a motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1 (a) (providing for voluntary

dismissals o f appeals by motion of the appellant or by agreement of the parties)

.

If Pilot Travel Centers LLC fails to respond to this order by February 25, 2014, we

will dismiss th is appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a); see also T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal if appellant has failed to comply with a court order).

_________________________________ Kar en Angelini, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 5th day of February, 2014

.

___________________________________ Kei th E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

    As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this Form 10-K of our report dated February 15, 2001 included in
Registration Statement File No.'s 333-15249, 333-15251, 333-29055, 333-29057,
333-83791, 333-83793, 333-94869, 333-33460, and 333-41664. It should be noted
that we have not audited any financial statements of the company subsequent to
December 31, 2000 or performed any audit procedures subsequent to the date of
our report.

                                         /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 28, 2001
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 1.95 2.47 54% 57%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

August 1, 2023

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Cost-of-Living Adjustment

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: A1. Starting December 2024, reduce the annual COLA by 1 percentage point.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision
Exhibit 32.01   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of POWRtec International Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Grant Jasmin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.      /s/Grant Jasmin By: Grant Jasmin Principal Executive Officer  Dated: April 15, 2011  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 -0.09 -0.13 -3% -3%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

September 15, 2023

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Level of Monthly Benefits

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: B5.6. Beginning for those newly eligible in 2024, reconfigure the special minimum 

benefit: (a) A year of coverage is defined to be either a year in which 4 quarters of coverage are earned or 

a child is in care. Childcare years are granted to parents who have a child under 6, with a limit of 5 such 

years. (b) At implementation, set the PIA for 30 years of coverage equal to 100 percent of the monthly 

poverty level (about $1,215 in 2023). For those with under 30 years of coverage, the PIA per year of 

coverage over 10 years is $1,215/20 = $60.75. (c) From 2023 to the year of implementation, 2024, index 

the PIA per year of coverage using the CPI index. Then, for later years, index the PIA per year of 

coverage by wage growth for successive cohorts. (d) Scale work requirements for disabled workers, 

based on the number of years of non-disabled potential work.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofNew England Realty Associates Limited Partnership (the “Partnership”) onForm 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, RonaldBrown, the President and a Director of the Partnership’s General Partner,NewReal, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18.U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuantto § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)               The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2)               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Partnership.

 

 
|   | /s/ RONALD BROWN                         |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                     |
|   | Ronald Brown                             |
|   | Principal Executive  Officer             |
|   | (President and Director of               |
|   | the Partnership’s General  Partner, |
|   | NewReal, Inc.)                      |

 

May 17, 2004

 

----
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
|   |
|   |   |
| 1.     | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of American Superconductor Corporation; and |
|   |
|   |   |
| 2.     | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |
|   |
|   |   |   |   |
| Date:  | June 7, 2018 | By: | /s/ Daniel P. McGahn |
|   |   |   | Daniel P. McGahn |
|   |   |   | Chief Executive Officer |
#### PAUL WARDEN v. J. K. ANDREWS and EUGENE TRANSOU, Trading as TRANSOU-JORDAN LUMBER COMPANY.

(Filed 27 January, 1931.)

Pleadings D b — Demurrer for misjoinder of parties and causes held properly sustained in this case.

Where the complaint alleges that several and independent defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in a certain amount arising on separate contracts, a demurrer on the ground of misjoinder of parties and causes of action will be sustained.

Civil action-, before *Harding, J.,*at May Term, 1930, of YadkiN.

Tbe plaintiff alleged that he purchased certain trucks from the defendant Andrews and gave a note for said purchase price. As a part of the consideration of said purchase the defendant Andrews assigned to him certain contracts for hauling lumber. These contracts are as follows: (a) Contract with J. K. Andrews; (b) contract with Eugene Transou; (c) contract with Transou-Jordan Lumber Co., a partnership composed of Eugene -Transou and L. R. Jordan. Plaintiff further alleged that he undertook the performance of said contracts, and during the time of performance there was an agreement between him and Andrews and Transou, acting for himself and the Transou-Jordan Lumber Company, a partnership-, that payments were to- be made directly to the plaintiff. He further alleged that he had hauled and delivered certain lumber to the defendants under said contracts, and that the amount due by the defendants was $1,541.57.

The defendant demurred upon the ground that there was a misjoinder of parties and causes of action.

*Williams & Reavis for plaintiff.*

*R. F. Grouse, G. W. Higgins and Folger & Folger for defendants.*

BrogdeN, J.

An examination o-f the complaint discloses that the suit is instituted upon separate and independent contracts. Hence the complaint does not tell one connected story, nor do- the various causes of action affect all of the parties. Therefore, the trial judge ruled correctly in sustaining the demurrer. *Quarry*Co. *v. Construction Co.,*151 N. C., 345, 66 S. E., 217; *Shore v. Holt,*185 N. C., 312, 117 S. E., 165; *Bank v. Angelo,*193 N. C., 576, 137 S. E., 705; *Sasser v. Bullard,*199 N. C., 562; McIntosh N. C. Practice and Procedure, 453.

Affirmed.