alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 245 (Thursday, December 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 66322]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31026]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Emergency Exemption: Issuance

    On 13 December 1995, a permit, US 809571, was issued to the 
Southwest Foundation for Biomedical Research, San Antonio, Texas to 
import two serum samples from one captive-born lion-tailed macaque 
(Macaca silenus) from the Metro Toronto Zoo, Ontario, Canada for 
diagnostic virology. The 30-day public comment period required by the 
Endangered Species Act was waived in accordance with section 10(c) of 
the Endangered Species Act. The Fish & Wildlife Service determined that 
an emergency affecting the health and life of one of the animal's care-
takers existed and no reasonable alternative was available to the 
applicant. The care-taker was bitten on 11 December 1995, by the animal 
which is a potential carrier of the monkey B-virus (Herpes simiae). The 
B-virus is lethal to humans if not diagnosed within the first few days. 
Regardless of the test results the lion-tailed macaque will not be 
destroyed.
    Written data or comments should be submitted to the Director, U.S. 
Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Management Authority, 4401 North 
Fairfax Drive, Room 420(c), Arlington, Virginia 22203 and must be 
received by the Director within 30 days of the date of this 
publication.
    Documents and other information submitted with these applications 
are available for review, subject to the requirements of the Privacy 
Act and Freedom of Information Act, by any party who submits a written 
request for a copy of such documents within 30 days of the date of 
publication of this notice at the above address.

    Dated: December 15, 1995.
Mary Ellen Amtower,
Acting Chief, Branch of Permits, Office of Management Authority.
[FR Doc. 95-31026 Filed 12-20-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
### Proposed Provision: B3.11. Increase the first PIA factor from 90 percent to 93 percent for all beneficiaries eligible as of January 2025 and for those newly eligible for benefits after 2024.

back
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00404-CR

Victor Cantu Jr.

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 158th District Court

of Denton County (F-2010-1583-B)

May 2, 2013

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _________________________________

 Justice Lee Gabriel
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3358 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3358

  To authorize the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for the lying in 
state of the remains of the last Medal of Honor recipient of World War 
    II, in order to honor the Greatest Generation and the more than 
 16,000,000 men and women who served in the Armed Forces of the United 
                       States from 1941 to 1945.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 9, 2021

Mr. Manchin (for himself, Mrs. Capito, Mrs. Hyde-Smith, Mr. Romney, Mr. 
   Cotton, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Tester, Mr. Cruz, and Ms. Duckworth) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                 Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for the lying in 
state of the remains of the last Medal of Honor recipient of World War 
    II, in order to honor the Greatest Generation and the more than 
 16,000,000 men and women who served in the Armed Forces of the United 
                       States from 1941 to 1945.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HONORING HERSHEL WOODROW ``WOODY'' WILLIAMS AS THE LAST 
              SURVIVING MEDAL OF HONOR RECIPIENT OF WORLD WAR II.

    (a) Use of Rotunda.--Upon his death, Hershel Woodrow ``Woody'' 
Williams, who is the last surviving recipient of the Medal of Honor for 
acts performed during World War II, shall be permitted to lie in state 
in the rotunda of the United States Capitol if he or his next of kin so 
elects.
    (b) Implementation.--The Architect of the Capitol, under the 
direction of the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of 
the House of Representatives, shall take the necessary steps to 
implement subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3601 

To require the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency 

to include breast pumps and other lactation supplies and equipment 

in disaster relief and emergency response. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 8 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 3), 2022 

Ms. DUCKWORTH (for herself and Mr. TILLIS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To require the Administrator of the Federal Emergency 

Management Agency to include breast pumps and other 

lactation supplies and equipment in disaster relief and 

emergency response. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Delivering Essentials 

5 to Mothers Amid Natural Disasters Act of 2022’’ or the 

6 ‘‘DEMAND Act of 2022’’. 

7 SEC. 2. LACTATION SUPPORT PROVIDER DEFINED. 

8 In this Act, the term ‘‘lactation support provider’’— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3601 IS

1 (1) means an individual who is a breastfeeding 

2 and lactation educator or counselor, without regard 

3 to the type of license or certification the individual 

4 holds, if any; and 

5 (2) includes— 

6 (A) a lactation consultant; 

7 (B) a breastfeeding counselor; 

8 (C) a breastfeeding peer counselor; and 

9 (D) a lactation educator. 

10 SEC. 3. BREASTFEEDING SUPPLIES AND SUPPORT SERV11 ICES. 

12 Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment 

13 of this Act, the Administrator of the Federal Emergency 

14 Management Agency, in consultation with the head of the 

15 Federal Interagency Breastfeeding Workgroup, shall des16 ignate the following items as items for which individuals 

17 and households may receive financial assistance under sec18 tion 408(e) of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 

19 Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5174(e)): 

20 (1) Breast pumps. 

21 (2) Other lactation supplies appropriate for use 

22 in an emergency setting. 

23 (3) Other equipment necessary to support the 

24 safe use of breast pumps. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3601 IS

1 (4) Services of lactation support providers. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and GraphsUpdated May 3, 2006   |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|

| Level of Monthly Benefits (PIA) | Description of Proposed Provision:      Progressive price indexing of PIA formula factors beginning with individuals newly eligible for OASDI benefits in 2012.  Create new bend point at the 60th percentile of earners.  Maintain current-law benefits for earners at the 60th percentile and below and reduce upper 2 formula factors (32% and 15%) such that maximum worker benefit grows by inflation rather than the growth in average wages. |
|---------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2005 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map |
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 February 27, 2007

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

 [DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-11033

 

D. C. Docket Nos. 

03-01443 CV-T-23TBM

97-00273-CR-T-2

JAMES MICHAEL TERRY,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent-Appellee.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

 

(February 27, 2007)

Before DUBINA and COX, Circuit Judges, and SCHLESINGER,* District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

___________________________

*Honorable Harvey E. Schlesinger, United States District Judge for the Middle District of

Florida, sitting by designation.
2

After reviewing the record and reading the parties’ briefs, we affirm the

district court’s order denying Terry’s second 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Under §

2244(b)(4), a district court shall dismiss any claim presented in a second or

successive application that does not meet the requirements set forth in §

2244(b)(2). See, e.g., In re Morris, 328 F.3d 739, 740-41 (5th Cir. 2003) (granting

petitioner’s application for leave to file a successive motion, but noting that the

district court would dismiss petitioner’s motion without reaching the merits if it

determined that the petitioner did not satisfy the requirements in § 2244(b)(2)). 

The district court properly concluded that none of Terry’s claims satisfied these

requirements. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.

AFFIRMED.
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Level of OASDI Contribution and Benefit Base | Description of Proposed Provision:      Determine the level of the contribution and benefit base such that 90 percent of the earnings would be subject to the payroll tax (phased in 2009-2018).  All earnings subject to the payroll tax would be used in determining benefits. |
|----------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                              |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2008 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified July 16, 2008 |
Presidential Documents

3937 

Federal Register 

Vol. 81, No. 14 

Friday, January 22, 2016 

Title 3— 

The President 

Notice of January 20, 2016 

Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Terrorists Who Threaten To Disrupt the Middle East Peace Process 

On January 23, 1995, by Executive Order 12947, the President declared 

a national emergency pursuant to the International Emergency Economic 

Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary 

threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United 

States constituted by grave acts of violence committed by foreign terrorists 

that disrupt the Middle East peace process. On August 20, 1998, by Executive 

Order 13099, the President modified the Annex to Executive Order 12947 

to identify four additional persons who threaten to disrupt the Middle 

East peace process. On February 16, 2005, by Executive Order 13372, the 

President clarified the steps taken in Executive Order 12947. 

These terrorist activities continue to threaten the Middle East peace process 

and to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, 

foreign policy, and economy of the United States. For this reason, the 

national emergency declared on January 23, 1995, and the measures adopted 

to deal with that emergency must continue in effect beyond January 23, 

2016. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national 

emergency with respect to foreign terrorists who threaten to disrupt the 

Middle East peace process. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to 

the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

January 20, 2016. 

[FR Doc. 2016–01427 

Filed 1–21–16; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 3295–F6–P 


mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with O0OB#1.EPS</GPH>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3470 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3470

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To provide for the implementation of certain trafficking in contracting 
                  provisions, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``End Human Trafficking in Government 
Contracts Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. IMPLEMENTATION OF TRAFFICKING IN CONTRACTING PROVISIONS.

    (a) Requirement To Refer Violations to Agency Suspension and 
Debarment Official.--Section 1704(c)(1) of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 22 U.S.C. 
7104b(c)(1)) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``refer the matter to the agency 
        suspension and debarment official and'' before ``consider 
        taking one of the following actions''; and
            (2) by striking subparagraph (G).
    (b) Report on Implementation of Trafficking in Contracting 
Provisions.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of 
this Act, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall 
submit to Congress a report on implementation of title XVII of the 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 
112-239; 126 Stat. 2092).

            Passed the Senate July 13, 2022.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
117th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3470

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To provide for the implementation of certain trafficking in contracting 
                  provisions, and for other purposes.
```
Exhibit 2.23
 SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE




---



##### 



Supplemental
Indenture sociedad anónima bursátil de
capital variable Company New
Guarantor Existing Guarantor Existing Guarantors Trustee Registrar Paying Agent
 RECITALS
 Indenture Notes
  AGREEMENT
        1




---



##### 



VITRO, S.A.B. de C.V., as IssuerBy:Name: Ramón Leal ChapaTitle: Attorney in FactBy:Name: Rafael Colome CarrascoTitle: Attorney in FactNEW GUARANTORVIDRIOS Y CRISTALES DEL NOROESTE, S.A. DE C.V.By:Name: Javier Arechavaleta SantosTitle: Attorney in FactEXISTING GUARANTORSVIMEXICO, S.A. DE C.V.;
VITRO ENVASES NORTEAMÉRICA, S.A. DE C.V.;
VITRO CORPORATIVO, S.A. DE C.V.;
VITRO ENVASES HOLDING, S.A. DE C.V.;
TALLER DE COLECCIÓN VITRO, S.A. DE C.V.; 
SERVICIOS CORPORATIVOS DE EDIFICACIONES, S.A. DE C.V.;
VIDRIERA MONTERREY, S.A. DE C.V.;
VIDRIERA LOS REYES, S.A. DE C.V.; 
VIDRIERA GUADALAJARA, S.A. DE C.V.;
VIDRIERA QUERETARO, S.A. DE C.V.;
VIDRIERA MEXICO, S.A. DE C.V.;
VIDRIERA TOLUCA, S.A. DE C.V.;
COMPAÑÍA VIDRIERA, S.A. DE C.V.;
  2




---



##### 



FABRICACION DE MAQUINAS, S.A. DE C.V.;
SERVICIOS INTEGRALES DE ACABADOS, S.A. DE C.V.; 
INMOBILIARIA LOMA DEL TORO, S.A. DE C.V.; 
INDUSTRIA DEL ALCALI, S.A. DE C.V.;
COMERCIALIZADORA ALCALI, S. DE R.L. DE C.V.;
VIDRIO LUX, S.A.;
VITRO PACKAGING, INC.;
CENTRO DE TECNOLOGIA VIDRIERA, LTD.;
VITRO EUROPA, LTD.; 
AMERICAN ASSET HOLDINGS, CORP.;
CRISA HOLDINGS CORP.;
TROPER INC.;
IMPERIAL ARTS CORP.;
TROPER SERVICES, INC.;
SFK INDUSTRIES, INC.;
ALLIANCE PRECISION PRODUCTS CORPORATION;
AMSILCO HOLDINGS, INC.;
BBO HOLDINGS, INC.;
CRISA CORP.;
VK CORP.;
VITRO AUTOMOTRIZ, S.A. DE C.V.;
VITRO FLEX, S.A. DE C.V.;
DISTRIBUIDORA NACIONAL DE VIDRIO, S.A. DE C.V.;
VITRO VIDRIO Y CRISTAL, S.A. DE C.V.;
VITRO FLOTADO CUBIERTAS, S.A. DE C.V.;
DISTRIBUIDOR VIDRIERO LAN, S.A. DE C.V.;
VITROCAR, S.A. DE C.V.;
CRISTALES INASTILLABLES DE MEXICO, S.A. DE C.V.;
VIDRIO PLANO DE MEXICO, S.A. DE C.V.;
VVP HOLDINGS CORP.;
VVP SYNDICATION, INC.;
VVP AUTOGLASS, INC.;
VITRO AMERICA, INC.;
SUPER SKY PRODUCTS, INC.;
SUPER SKY INTERNATIONAL, INC.;
VVP FINANCE CORP.;
SUPER SKY CONSTRUCTORS, INC.;
VITRO COLOMBIA, S.A.; 
VVP EUROPA HOLDINGS, B.V.;
  3




---



##### 



VITRO DO BRASIL INDUSTRIA E COMERCIO, LTDA.;
ORIENTAL GLASS, INC.;
VITRO CHEMICALS, FIBERS AND MINING, INC.;
VITROSA HOLDING, LTD.; 
VITRO GLOBAL, LTD.; 
VIDRIO PLANO, S.A. DE C.V.;
DISTRIBUIDORA DE VIDRIO Y CRISTAL, S.A. DE C.V.;
VIDRIO PLANO DE MEXICALI, S.A. DE C.V.;
VITEMCO VENEZUELA, S.A.;
VITRO PANAMA, S.A.;
SERVICIOS Y OPERACIONES FINANCIERAS VITRO, S.A. DE C.V.; AND
VITEMCO ECUADOR, S.A.By:Name: Ramón Leal ChapaTitle: Attorney in FactBy:Name: Rafael Colome CarrascoTitle: Attorney in Fact
  4




---



##### 



THE BANK OF NEW YORK, as
Trustee, Registrar and
Paying AgentBy:Name:Title:
  5
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 243 (Tuesday, December 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 65352]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30929]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings of the National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis 
Panel:

    Agenda/Purpose: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Committee Name: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    Date: December 19, 1995.
    Time: 3 p.m.
    Place: Parklawn Building, Room 9C-18, 5600 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, MD 20857.
    Contact Person: W. Gregory Zimmerman, Parklawn Building, Room 
9C-18, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, Telephone: 301, 443-
1340.

    Committee Name: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    Date: December 19, 1995.
    Time: 2 p.m.
    Place: Parklawn Building, Room 9C-18, 5600 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, MD 20857.
    Contact Person: W. Gregory Zimmerman, Parklawn Building, Room 
9C-18, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, Telephone: 301, 443-
1340.
    The meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    This notice is being published less than fifteen days prior to 
the meetings due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations 
imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Numbers 93.242, 
93.281, 93.282)

    Dated: December 14, 1995.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 95-30929 Filed 12-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### L. BANKS HOLT v. HERBERT L. GREGORY, a Minor, Appearing by and Through His Guardian Ad Litem F. E. WALLACE, JR.; HILDA IOLA GREGORY; TWIN STATES INSURANCE CORPORATION, and MOTORS INSURANCE CORPORATION.

(Filed 19 October, 1955.)

Appeal by defendant Herbert L. Gregory from *Parker, J.,*February Term, 1955, of LeNOir.

Civil action growing out of automobile collision that occurred about *11:30*p.m. on 2 May, 1954, at intersection of Washington and Nelson Streets in Kinston.

Plaintiff was driving his 1952 Dodge east along Washington Street; and defendant Herbert L. Gregory, then twenty years of age, was driv*765ing a 1954 Chevrolet owned by his sister, Hilda Iola Gregory, south along Nelson Street.

Plaintiff’s action was against the defendants Gregory for damages on account of personal injuries and damage to his Dodge car, allegedly caused by the negligence of the driver of the Gregory car. Plaintiff alleged that defendant Hilda Iola Gregory was liable on principles of agency. Defendants denied negligence, alleged contributory negligence; and defendant Hilda Iola Gregory alleged a cross action against plaintiff for damages to her Chevrolet car.

Twin States Insurance Company and Motors Insurance Corporation were made parties because of payments made by them to the owners of the Dodge and Chevrolet cars, respectively, under collision insurance policies.

At the close of plaintiff’s evidence, the motion of defendant Hilda Iola Gregory for judgment of involuntary nonsuit was allowed. No evidence was offered, and no issues were submitted, bearing upon the alleged cross action of defendant Hilda Iola Gregory.

The jury found that plaintiff was injured and his automobile damaged by the negligence of defendant Herbert L. Gregory, that plaintiff was not contributorily negligent, and awarded damages.

Judgment for plaintiff was entered against defendant Herbert L. Gregory in accordance with the verdict. Defendant Herbert L. Gregory excepted and appealed, assigning as error (1) the court’s denial of his motions for judgment of involuntary nonsuit, and (2) alleged errors of commission and of omission in the charge.

*Owens & Langley for plaintiff, appellee.*

*Whitaker & Jeffress for defendant Herbert L. Gregory, appellant.*

PER CuRiam.

Upon a careful review of the evidence, we concur in Judge Parker’s denial of appellant’s motions for judgment of involuntary nonsuit. Moreover, consideration of the charge fails to disclose any error of law deemed of sufficient prejudicial effect to warrant a new trial. Hence, the verdict and judgment will not be disturbed.

No error.
### Proposed Provision: E3.11. Beginning in 2031, apply 2 percent payroll tax rate on earnings over the wage-indexed equivalent of $300,000 in 2017 (about $522,300 in 2031), with the threshold wage-indexed after 2031. Do not provide benefit credit for additional earnings taxed.