alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 246 (Friday, December 22, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 66576]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31168]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Proposed Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment 
Request

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury, as part of its continuing 
effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general 
public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment 
on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C. 
3506(c)(2)(A)). Currently, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms 
within the Department of the Treasury is soliciting comments concerning 
the Licensed Firearms Manufactures Records of Production, Disposition, 
and Supporting Data.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before February 20, 
1996 to be assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco 
and Firearms, Linda Barnes, 650 Massachusetts Avenue, NW., Washington, 
DC 20226, (202) 927-7768.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or 
copies of the form(s) and instructions should be directed to Robert 
Mosley, Chief, Firearms and Explosives Operations Branch, 650 
Massachusetts Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20226, (202) 927-8310.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Title: Licensed Firearms Manufacturers Records of Production, 
Disposition, and Supporting Data.
    OMB Number: 1512-0369.
    Recordkeeping Requirement ID Number: ATF REC 5300/1.
    Abstract: Firearms manufacturers records are permanent records of 
all firearms manufactured and records of their disposition. These 
records are vital to support ATF's mission to inquire into the 
disposition of any firearm in the course of a criminal investigation.
    Current Actions: There are no changes to this information 
collection and it is being submitted for extension purposes only.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 1,380.
    Estimated Time Per Respondent: 3 minutes per line item.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 72,023.

    REQUEST FOR COMMENTS: Comments submitted in response to this notice 
will be summarized and/or included in the request for OMB approval. All 
comments will become a matter of public record. Written comments should 
address the accuracy of the burden estimates and ways to minimize 
burden including the use of automated collection techniques or the use 
of other forms of information technology, as well as other relevant 
aspects of the information collection request.

    Dates: December 15, 1995.
John W. Magaw,
Director.
[FR Doc. 95-31168 Filed 12-21-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P
#### GEORGIA WHITEHURST v. E. ELLIS WILLIAMS AND W. W. CHADWICK.

(Filed 30 October, 1940.)

Automobiles §§ 11, 18a—

The evidence tended to show that plaintiff was riding in an automobile traveling in one direction and that as the automobile approached a truck and another car traveling in the opposite direction, the other car, in at*391tempting to pass the truck, drove on its left side of the highway directly in the path of the car in which plaintiff was riding when distant too short a space to enable the driver to avoid the collision. *Held:*Judgment as of nonsuit was properly entered as to the driver of the ear in which plaintiff was riding.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Bone, J.,*at June Term, 1940, of Carteret.

*F. W. Hill, W. F. Ward, and B. A. Nunn for plaintiff, appellant.*

*L. I. Moore for defendant, appellee.*

PeR Curiam.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries received in an automobile collision alleged to have been caused by the joint and concurring negligence of the defendants. The defendant Chadwick failed to answer and judgment by default and inquiry was awarded as to him. The court sustained a motion to dismiss the action and for a judgment as in case of nonsuit as to the defendant Williams lodged when the plaintiff had introduced her evidence and rested her ease and renewed after all the evidence on both sides was in. C. S., 567. From judgment as in case of nonsuit as to the defendant Williams, the plaintiff appealed assigning as error the granting of the defendant’s motion therefor.

The evidence, both of the plaintiff and of the defendant, tended to show that the plaintiff was riding as a guest in the automobile of the defendant Williams, which was being driven on a State Highway in a westerly direction, that the automobile of the defendant Chadwick was being driven on the same highway in an easterly direction, that the Chadwick automobile was directly behind a large truck going in the same direction, that the driver of the Chadwick automobile tried to pass the truck on its left side, and in so doing threw his automobile in the direct path of the Williams automobile in too short a distance to enable him to avoid the collision between the two automobiles, which caused the injuries to the plaintiff.

We are of the opinion, and so hold, that under the evidence in this case the judgment of nonsuit was properly entered.

Affirmed.
#### VENETTA BARBER, Administratrix of ADAM BARBER, Deceased. v. C. N. STEED.

(Filed 30 November, 1932.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *MacBae, Special Judge,*at May Term, 1932, of MecKLENbueo.

*Hiram P. Whitacre and Ralph V. Kidd for appellant.*

*W. G. Ginter and ühlman S. Alexander for appellee.*

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff’s intestate was killed by the impact of an automobile driven by the defendant in an easterly direction between Charlotte and Albemarle on Highway 27 near its intersection with Highway 151 in Cabarrus County. Garman’s Filling Station is situated west of the intersection and on the right-hand side of Highway 27 as one goes in the- direction of Albemarle. The lights from the station shone out into the highway and across the intersection. The intestate was standing near the station on the edge of Highway 27 awaiting the arrival of a bus from Raleigh on which he intended to return to Charlotte. As the bus approached he waived his handkerchief as a signal for the driver to stop. There was evidence tending to show that he “got on the highway about two feet”; that while waving his handkerchief he was looking in the direction of the bus; that he did not look toward the west or in the direction from which the defendant’s car was coming, and that *855be bad almost come to a stop wben tbe defendant’s car struck bim and inflicted injuries causing bis death.

There was evidence of tbe defendant’s negligence and of tbe contributory negligence of tbe intestate, and tbe verdict established tbe negligence both of tbe defendant and of tbe intestate. Tbe exceptions are addressed principally to alleged error relating to contributory negligence.

After due consideration of tbe oral argument and of tbe exhaustive briefs filed in behalf of tbe parties we have discovered no error which calls for interference with tbe verdict or tbe judgment.

No error.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 29 (Monday, February 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 8223]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3453]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Science Board Task Force on Theater Missile Defense (TMD)

ACTION: Change in Date/Location of Advisory Committee Meeting Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The meeting of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Theater 
Missile Defense (TMD) scheduled for February 1-2, 1995 at the Pentagon, 
Arlington, Virginia, as published in the Federal Register (Vol. 60, No. 
19, Page 5656, Monday, January 30, 1995, FR Doc. 95-2195) will be held 
on February 13-14, 1995 at Science Applications International 
Corporation (SAIC), McLean, Virginia.

    Dated: February 7, 1995.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 95-3453 Filed 2-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 577 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the conditions under 

which certain persons may be treated as adjudicated mentally incompetent for certain purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2013 

Mr. STOCKMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the conditions under which certain persons may be treated as 

adjudicated mentally incompetent for certain purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Second 

5 Amendment Protection Act’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 577 IH

1 SEC. 2. CONDITIONS FOR TREATMENT OF CERTAIN PER2 SONS AS ADJUDICATED MENTALLY INCOM3 PETENT FOR CERTAIN PURPOSES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 55 of title 38, United 

5 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing new section: 

7 ‘‘§ 5511. Conditions for treatment of certain persons 

8 as adjudicated mentally incompetent for 

9 certain purposes 

10 ‘‘In any case arising out of the administration by the 

11 Secretary of laws and benefits under this title, a person 

12 who is mentally incapacitated, deemed mentally incom13 petent, or experiencing an extended loss of consciousness 

14 shall not be considered adjudicated as a mental defective 

15 under subsection (d)(4) or (g)(4) of section 922 of title 

16 18 without the order or finding of a judge, magistrate, 

17 or other judicial authority of competent jurisdiction that 

18 such person is a danger to himself or herself or others.’’. 

19 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

20 at the beginning of chapter 55 of such title is amended 

21 by adding at the end the following new item: 

‘‘5511. Conditions for treatment of certain persons as adjudicated mentally incompetent for certain purposes.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10.13  January 8, 2002  FOURTH AMENDMENT TO OFFICE
BUILDING LEASE DATED
DECEMBER 17, 1999 BY AND BETWEEN THE CAMBAY GROUP
INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, AS LANDLORD AND
UNIFY CORPORATION, AS TENANT.  This lease shall be hereby
amended as follows:  In lieu of paragraph 42 of the
lease referenced above, effective January 1, 2002 Tenant Improvements totaling
$105,000.00 will be amortized over the remainder of the lease at a rate of 10%
resulting in a current increase in the cost per square foot of rentable area
from $1.60 to $1.65.  Current rent will
increase from $60,990.00 to $62,896.35  The balance of the lease
payments will be as follows:  Months 1-2
  
  Free of RentMonths 3-6
  
  $1.55 per
  rsf/mo., fully serviced
  
  $
  59,084.45Months 7-13
  
  $1.60 per
  rsf/mo., fully serviced
  
  $
  60,990.00Months 14-18
  
  $1.65 per
  rsf/mo., fully serviced
  
  $
  62,896.35Months 19-30
  
  $1.71 per
  rsf/mo., fully serviced
  
  $
  65,183.49Months 31-42
  
  $1.77 per
  rsf/mo., fully serviced
  
  $
  67,470.63Months 43-54
  
  $1.83 per
  rsf/mo., fully serviced
  
  $
  69,757.77Months 55-66
  
  $1.89 per
  rsf/mo., fully serviced
  
  $
  72,044.91Months 67-78
  
  $1.95 per
  rsf/mo., fully serviced
  
  $
  74,332.05Months 79-90
  
  $2.01 per
  rsf/mo., fully serviced
  
  $
  76,619.19   AGREED AND ACCEPTED  Landlord:The
Cambay Group, Inc.  By:
  
  
  Date:1-31-02William C. ScottCFO  Tenant:Unify
Corporation  By:
  
  
  Date:1-10-02David AdamsCFO
​

Exhibit 10.17
​
NON-REVOLVING LINE OF CREDIT LOAN AGREEMENT AMENDMENT
​
This Non-Revolving Line of Credit Line of Credit Loan Agreement Amendment (the “Amendment”) is dated as of December 14, 2022, between Loop Media, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Borrower”) and Excel Family Partners LLLP and (the “Lender”). Each of the Borrower and Lender is a “Party” to this Amendment and together are “Parties.” Terms used herein but not otherwise defined herein have the meaning given to such terms in the Loan Agreement (defined below).
WHEREAS, the Borrower has entered into that certain Non-Revolving Line of Credit Agreement (the “Agreement”), with an Effective Date of April 25, 2022, with Lender for a non-revolving line of credit not to exceed the sum of US$4,022,986.00, in aggregate.
WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed that the Line of Credit Maturity Date shall be extended from eighteen (18) months from the date of the Agreement to twenty-four (24) months from the date of the Agreement.  
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained in this Amendment, and for other good and valuable consideration the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Borrower and the Lender agree as follows:
​
​
		1.	 Extension of Line of Credit Maturity Date.

​
Section I – Definitions and Interpretation – 1.1 Terms Defined – “Line of Credit Maturity Date” in the Agreement is hereby removed and replaced in its entirety by the following:
​
“Line of Credit Maturity Date – Twenty-four (24) months from the Effective Date.” 
​
		2.	Miscellaneous.

​

		(a)	Governing Law. This Amendment will be governed by and construed in accordance with the internal laws of the State of Florida without giving effect to any choice or conflict of law provision or rule.	

​
		(b)	Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original, but all of which together will be deemed to be one and the same agreement. Counterparts may be delivered via facsimile, electronic mail (including PDF or any electronic signature complying with the U.S. federal ESIGN Act of 2000, e.g., www.docusign.com) or other transmission method, and any counterpart so delivered will be deemed to have been duly and validly delivered and be valid and effective for all purposes.	

​
		(c)	Entire Agreement. This Amendment, together with the Agreement, constitute the full and entire understanding and agreement between the parties with regard to the subject hereof.	

​
[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]



​

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have caused this Amendment to be duly executed by their respective authorized signatories as of the date first indicated above.
​
​
BORROWER
​
LOOP MEDIA, INC.
Address for Notice:
​
700 N. Central Avenue, Suite 430
Glendale, CA 91203 
Email: neil@loop.tv; patrick@loop.com
​
​
By: /s/ Neil Watanabe​ ​
​
Name: Neil Watanabe  
Title: CFO
​
​
LENDER
​
Excel Family Partners, LLLP 
Address for Notice:
103 Plaza Dr. Suite B
St. Clairsville, OH 43950
Email: bcassidysr@yahoo.com 
​
​
By: Fortress Holdings, LLC, its General Partner
​
​
By: /s/ Bruce A. Cassidy, Sr.​ ​
​
Authorized Signatory: Bruce A. Cassidy, Sr. 
Title: Manager
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Unify Corporation (the
Company) for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Todd E.
Wille, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), that, to the best of my
knowledge:

|(1) |  | The Report fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and                                                                   
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | The information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the
      period covered by the Report.

June 30, 2008

/s/ TODD E. WILLETodd E. WillePresident
      and Chief Executive Officer


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification
accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 and shall not, except to the
extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the
Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.

---
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 242 (Monday, December 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 65068]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30628]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Stipulation of Settlement Pursuant to the 
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act

    In accordance with Departmental policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that on November 24, 1995, a proposed Stipulation of 
Settlement in In re St. Johnsbury Trucking Company, Inc., Civil Action 
No. 93-43136, was lodged with the United States Bankruptcy Court for 
the Southern District of New York. The proposed Stipulation of 
Settlement concerns the response to the existence of hazardous 
substances at the Pine Street Canal Site located in Burlington, Vermont 
pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and 
Liability Act, as amended.
    Under the terms of the Stipulation of Settlement, the United States 
Environmental Protection Agency will be reimbursed $35,000 for 
administrative expenses incurred in connection with property formerly 
owned by St. Johnsbury. St. Johnsbury also agrees to an allowed 
unsecured claim in the amount of $3,000,000 for costs incurred and to 
be incurred by the United States in connection with response actions at 
the Site and in the amount of $150,000 for natural resource damages for 
resources under the trusteeship of the Department of Interior.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments relating to the 
proposed Stipulation of Settlement. Comments should be addressed to the 
Assistant Attorney General of the Environment and Natural Resources 
Division, Department of Justice, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, D.C. 
20044, and should refer to In re St. Johnsbury Trucking Company, Inc., 
D.J. Ref. 90-11-2-978.
    The proposed Stipulation may be examined at the Region 1 Office of 
the Environmental Protection Agency, One Congress Street, Boston, 
Massachusetts. Copies of the Consent Decree may be examined at the 
Environmental Enforcement Section Document Center, 1120 G Street, N.W., 
4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005, (202) 624-0892. A copy of the 
proposed Consent Decree may be obtained in person or by mail from the 
Document Center. In requesting a copy, please refer to the referenced 
case and enclose a check in the amount of $4.25 (25 cents per page 
reproduction cost) made payable to Consent Decree Library.
Joel M. Gross,
Acting Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 95-30628 Filed 12-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
No. 1054.

*Pearse O’Connor*for petitioner.

#### LaCamera. *v.*Pennsylvania.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, AS AMENDED
  1.
    
    the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended June 30,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the Exchange Act); and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: August 12, 2009/s/ Kathleen M. CruscoName:
    Kathleen M. CruscoTitle:
    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer The foregoing certification which accompanies the Report is not deemed filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing.
**EXHIBIT21.1**

** **

**LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT**

** **

**Subsidiaries of DeCrane Aircraft Holdings, Inc.**

 

AUDIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.,an Arkansas corporation.

 

CARL F. BOOTH & CO.,LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.

 

CUSTOM WOODWORK &PLASTICS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.

 

DAH-IP HOLDINGS, INC.,a Delaware corporation.

 

DAH-IP INFINITY, INC.,a Delaware corporation.

 

DECRANE AIRCRAFT SEATINGCOMPANY, INC., a Wisconsin corporation.

 

DECRANE CABIN INTERIORS,LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.

 

DECRANE CABIN INTERIORS -CANADA, Inc., a Delaware corporation.

 

HOLLINGSEAD INTERNATIONAL,INC., a California corporation.

 

PATS AIRCRAFT, LLC, aDelaware limited liability company.

 

PCI NEWCO, INC., a Delawarecorporation.

 

PPI HOLDINGS, INC., a Kansascorporation.

 

PRECISION PATTERN, INC., aKansas corporation.

 

THE INFINITY PARTNERS, LTD.,a Texas limited partnership.

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 2, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 63]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31531]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP96-104-000]


Texas Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Request Under 
Blanket Authorization

December 21, 1995.
    Take notice that on December 15, 1995, Texas Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Texas Gas), 3800 Frederica Street, Owensboro, Kentucky 
42301, filed in Docket No. CP96-104-000 a request pursuant to Sections 
157.205 and 157.211 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural 
Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205, 157.211) for authorization to construct and 
operate a delivery point under Texas Gas's blanket certificate issued 
in Docket No. CP82-407-000 pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas 
Act, all as more fully set forth in the request that is on file with 
the Commission and open to public inspection.
    Texas Gas proposes to construct and operate a delivery point for 
USG Interiors, Inc. (Interiors) in Washington County, Mississippi. 
Interiors has requested that Texas Gas construct the new delivery point 
and will reimburse Texas Gas in full for the cost of the facilities.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-31531 Filed 12-29-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M