alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of

-- )

)

I.B.V., LTD ) ASBCA No. 61685

)

Under Contract No. W912GB

- 12

- P

- 0009 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Chidinma P. Okogbue, Esq.

Holmes Pittman & Haraguchi LLP

Chester, MD

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Michael P. Goodman, Esq.

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney

Brett R. Howard, Esq.

Engineer Trial Attorney

U.S. Army Engineer District, Europe Distric t

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: March 20, 2020

JAMES R. SWEET

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true c opy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61685 , Appeal of I.B.V., LTD

, rende red in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: March 20, 2020

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
**Exhibit  23.1**

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
We consent  to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-72130, 33-58362,  333-3846, 333-35215, 333-40634, 333-50330, 333-75134 and 333-114151 of Genta  Incorporated on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 33-85887, 333-94181,  333-94185 and 333-101022 of Genta Incorporated on Form S-8 of our report dated  March 10, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Genta Incorporated and subsidiaries (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern) and of our report dated March 10, 2006, relating to management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial  reporting appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Genta Incorporated  for the year ended December 31, 2005.    /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Parsippany, NewJersey  March 10, 2006
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5761 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to expand the definition 

of an unauthorized alien to include aliens who have not been admitted 

to and are not lawfully present in the United States, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 20, 2014 

Mr. BARLETTA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to expand 

the definition of an unauthorized alien to include aliens 

who have not been admitted to and are not lawfully 

present in the United States, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Defense of Legal 

5 Workers Act of 2014’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 5761 IH

1 SEC. 2. ADMISSION AND LAWFUL PRESENCE REQUIRED 

2 FOR EMPLOYMENT AUTHORIZATION. 

3 Section 274A(h)(3) of the Immigration and Nation4 ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1324a(h)(3)) is amended— 

5 (1) by inserting before ‘‘authorized to be so em6 ployed by this Act’’ the following: ‘‘an alien other7 wise admitted to and lawfully present in the United 

8 States, and’’; and 

9 (2) by inserting at the end the following: ‘‘An 

10 alien without lawful status shall be considered to be 

11 an unauthorized alien for purposes of this Act.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.7(b)

                             AMENDMENT NO. 2 OF THE
                           BELDEN & BLAKE CORPORATION
                     1999 CHANGE IN CONTROL PROTECTION PLAN
                                FOR KEY EMPLOYEES
                        AMENDED EFFECTIVE AUGUST 1, 2002

         The Belden & Blake Corporation 1999 Change in Control Protection Plan
for Key Employees (the "Plan"), originally effective August 1, 1999, is hereby
amended, effective as of August 1, 2002, as follows:

         Section 5.1 of Article V of the Plan is amended in its entirety to read
as follows:

         Duration. If a Change in Control has not occurred, the Plan shall
expire five (5) years from the Effective Date unless extended for an additional
period by resolution adopted by the Board in its discretion, at any time during
the term of the Plan. If a Change of Control occurs during the term of this
Plan, the Plan shall continue in full force and effect and shall not terminate
or expire until after all Employees who become entitled to Severance Pay
hereunder have received such Severance Pay in full.

         Except as expressly amended above, the provisions of the Plan shall
continue in full force and effect.

                                    EXECUTION

         To record the adoption of this Amendment to the Plan, Belden & Blake
Corporation has caused its appropriate officers to affix its name and seal
hereto as of the 23rd day of October, 2002

ATTEST:                             BELDEN & BLAKE CORPORATION

Duane D. Clark                             By: /s/ John L. Schwager
---------------                                ---------------------------------
Duane D. Clark                             John L. Schwager
Secretary
                                    Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-17-00623-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.R.G., G.H., III, and L.M.G.

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016PA01168

Honorable Stephani A. Walsh, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 1, 2017

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION; MOTION TO ABATE DENIED

On September 26, 2017, appellant’s court-appointed attorney ad litem filed a notice of 

appeal, affirmatively representing to this court that the trial court signed an order terminating 

appellant’s parental rights “on or about September 8, 2017.” The notice of appeal used a minor’s 

name in violation of Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.8 and 9.9. 

On October 2, 2017, we ordered appellant’s attorney ad litem to file, by October 5, 2017,

an amended notice of appeal that complied with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. On 

October 4, 2017, the trial court clerk filed a clerk’s record showing appellant had been appointed 

a new attorney ad litem for purposes of this appeal, but the clerk’s record did not contain an order 

terminating appellant’s parental rights. No amended notice of appeal was filed. 
04-17-00623-CV

- 2 -

We thereafter issued another order directing appellant’s attorney ad litem for this appeal to 

file, by October 16, 2017, the amended notice of appeal and a response showing why this appeal 

should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. On October 16, 2017, appellant’s attorney ad 

litem for this appeal filed an amended notice of appeal and a “motion to abate appeal deadlines.” 

The motion states, “Appellant’s parental rights were not terminated after a bench trial. Notice of 

appeal was given without a signed Final Order.” The motion “requests an abatement of the appeal 

deadline until a final order is filed.” Appellant’s motion does not otherwise address this court’s 

appellate jurisdiction. The amended notice of appeal also states the “final decree of 

termination . . . has not been signed to date.” 

To be appealable, a judgment or order must be written and signed by the trial court. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1 (providing the appellate timetable runs from the date the judgment or order is 

signed). An oral ruling, not reduced to writing and signed by the trial court, is not a final or 

otherwise appealable judgment or order. Farmer v. Ben E. Keith Co., 907 S.W.2d 495, 496 (Tex.

1995) (per curiam). We are not required “to docket and hold an appeal open until there is an 

appealable judgment or order at some future date.” Ganesan v. Reeves, 236 S.W.3d 816, 817 (Tex. 

App.—Waco 2007, pet. denied). When, as here, there is no appealable judgment or order, we must 

dismiss the appeal. See id. (citing TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a), 44.3). We therefore deny appellant’s 

motion to abate and dismiss this appeal. See id.

PER CURIAM
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXAS
N O . W R - 6 0 , 9 3 9 - 0 4

EX P ARTE KENNYGONZALEZ, Applicant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 753382-A IN THE 228 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Cr i m i n al P ro cedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant wa s convicted of capital murder and sentenc ed to life imprisonment. The Four teenth Court of Ap p eals aff irmed his conviction. Gonzales v. State , No. 14-98-00128- CR (Tex. App.—Houston [14 Dist. ] S ep t . 14, 1999)(not t h designated f

or publication). On April 13, 2018, this Court rema nded this application to the trial court for finding s of fac t and conclusions of law. On September 24, 2018, the trial co u rt s i gned finding s of fac t andconclusions of law recommending denying relief on Applicant’s i n ef fe cti ve assist ance of counsel grounds. The tria l court re commended that relief be denied. Ba sed on the trial c ourt’s finding s of fac t a s well as this Court’s independe nt r eview of the entire r ecor d, we de ny

relief
. Filed: De cembe r 5, 2018 Do not publish
## Summary Measures and Graphs

- Individual Provisions
- Level of Monthly Benefits

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						B7.10: Replace the current-law WEP with a new calculation for most OASI and DI benefits based on covered and non-covered earnings, phased in for beneficiaries becoming newly eligible in 2030 through 2039. For this new approach, compute a PIA based on all past earnings (covered and non-covered), and multiply by the "non-covered earnings ratio." This ratio is equal to the current-law concept of the average indexed monthly earnings computed without non-covered earnings divided by a modified average indexed monthly earnings that includes both covered and non-covered earnings in agency records.**

|  |  |
|--|--|
Skip to main content

# Social Security

Search
Menu
Español
Sign in

## Social Security & Medicare Tax Data

Office of the Chief Actuary 

Tax data by program & source

Trust fund data

Tax rates

Maximum taxable for Social Security

Trust fund FAQs

For Social Security and Medicare's Hospital Insurance program,     the  main source of income is taxes      on wages and self-employment income. Taxes on wages are known     as FICA (*Federal  Insurance  Contributions Act*) taxes and our     FICA tax data include both employee and employer taxes. Taxes on     self-employment are sometimes referred to as SECA      (*Self Employment Contributions Act*) taxes.     Both FICA and SECA taxes are deposited initially on an     estimated basis, with subsequent adjustments     for actual data.

      Monthly employment tax data are available for each of the      following trust funds:  Social Security's Old-Age     and Survivors Insurance (OASI) or      Disability Insurance (DI) Trust Fund, or Medicare's Hospital      Insurance (HI) Trust Fund.  Please note that reports of these data are      somewhat technical in nature and not all abbreviations are fully explained.

**Trust fund selection**  Individual fund  Combined fundsOASIDIHI  (Medicare)Social Security  (OASI & DI)All funds           (OASI, DI, & HI)**Calendar year**         Monthly employment tax data will be provided for selected year.       No data are available for years before 1991.               

Footer menu
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.15
 
                               AMENDMENT NUMBER 1
                           TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT OF
                                 JERRY D. HORN
 
     Amendment Number 1, dated as of January 23, 1998 to Employment Agreement,
dated as of June 16, 1997 as previously amended (the "Employment Agreement"),
between General Nutrition, Incorporated (the "Company") and Jerry D. Horn
("Executive"). Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the
meanings assigned to them in the Employment Agreement.
 
     WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the
Company by unanimous consent, approved an amendment of Executive's Employment
Agreement.
 
     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of Executive's continued performance of
his duties as an officer of the Company, the Company and Executive hereby agree
that:
 
     1. The Employment Period is hereby extended until February 1, 2002. All
references to February 3, 2001 in the Employment Agreement, are hereby changed
to references to February 1, 2002, except that in paragraph 3(a) Base Salary,
the base salary shall be $150,000 for both the fiscal year ending February 3,
2001 and the fiscal year ending February 1, 2002.
 
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of
the date first written above.
 
<TABLE>
<S>                                                <C>
EXECUTIVE                                          GENERAL NUTRITION, INCORPORATED

By: /s/ JERRY D. HORN                              By: /s/ JAMES M. SANDER
--------------------------------------------       -------------------------------------------
    Jerry D. Horn
 
                                                   Title: Vice President
 
Date:  2/3/98                                      Date:  2/3/98
 
Witness: /s/ CHRISTINE M. RUGGIERO                 Witness: /s/ CHRISTINE M. RUGGIERO
--------------------------------------------      -------------------------------------------
 
GENERAL NUTRITION COMPANIES, INC.
  COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
 
By: /s/ THOMAS R. SHEPHERD
--------------------------------------------
    Thomas R. Shepherd
 
By: /s/ DAVID LUCAS
--------------------------------------------
    David Lucas
</TABLE>
#### D. L. LATHAM et al. v. JAMES H. HARRIS, Sheriff of Beaufort County.

(Filed 26 October, 1927.)

Appeal by plaintiffs from judgment of *Midyetie, J.,*rendered at Chambers, on 3 September, 1921.

Affirmed.

Plaintiffs by this action seek to have defendant, sheriff of Beaufort County, restrained and enjoined from enforcing in bis county a criminal statute — chapter 349, Public-Local Laws 1925 — against them and others who have violated or who may hereafter violate its provisions, upon their allegation that said statute is void and unconstitutional. -

From judgment dissolving a temporary restraining order theretofore issued, and dismissing tbe action, plaintiffs appealed to tbe Supreme Court.

*Ward & Grimes for plaintiffs.*

*Attorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash and Harry McMullan for defendant.*

*803Pee Cueiam.

Plaintiffs, by this action to restrain and enjoin defendant, sheriff of Beaufort County, from enforcing a criminal statute in said county, seek to present for decision the question as to the constitutionality of the statute. It has been repeatedly held that this cannot be done. *Moore v. Bell,*191 N. C., 305, and cases therein cited. There are no sufficient allegations in the complaint that property rights of plaintiffs are or will be affected by the enforcement of the statute to bring the action within the principle recently restated in *Angelo v. City of Winston-Salem,*193 N. C., 207.

The temporary restraining order was improvidently made. The judgment dissolving this order and dismissing the action is

Affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JOSEPH EDWARD WILLIAMS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 441 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23rd day of January, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
                       
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars               
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              JUN-30-1998           
<PERIOD-START>                 JUL-01-1997    
<PERIOD-END>                   JUN-30-1998    
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                           1    
<CASH>                               46,135   
<SECURITIES>                              0   
<RECEIVABLES>                             0   
<ALLOWANCES>                              0   
<INVENTORY>                               0   
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    203,179   
<PP&E>                              381,493   
<DEPRECIATION>                      202,201   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    3,184,807   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             3,456,748   
<BONDS>                                   0   
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0   
<PREFERRED>                               0   
<COMMON>                         16,308,438   
<OTHER-SE>                        1,476,669   
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      3,184,807   
<SALES>                                   0   
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          0   
<CGS>                                     0   
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             0   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0   
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0   
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  719,126   
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (3,648,748)             
<INCOME-TAX>                              0  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (3,648,748)   
<DISCONTINUED>                            0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0   
<CHANGES>                                 0   
<NET-INCOME>                     (3,648,748)   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         (1.45)  
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (1.45)  
        




</TABLE>
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 239 (Wednesday, December 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64082-64083]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30296]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

The National Partnership Council

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

TIME AND DATE: 1:00 p.m., December 13, 1995.

PLACE: OPM Conference Center, Room 1350, Theodore Roosevelt Building, 
1900 E Street, NW., Washington, DC 20415-0001. The conference center is 
located on the first floor. Seating will be available on a first-come, 
first-served basis. Handicapped individuals wishing to attend should 
contact OPM at the number shown below to obtain appropriate 
accommodations.

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public from 1:00 p.m. until 
approximately 1:30 p.m. The rest of the meeting will be closed to the 
public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: National Partnership Council (NPC) Training 
and Facilitation Handbook; selection of NPC Award winners.

PORTION OPEN TO THE PUBLIC: Discussion of the NPC Training and 
Facilitation Handbook and other items referred to in the strategic 
action plan for 1995 that was adopted at the January 10, 1995, meeting. 
This portion of the meeting will run from 1:00 p.m. until approximately 
1:30 p.m.

PORTION CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC: Under 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552b(c)(9)(B) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, the discussion and selection of NPC 
Partnership Award winners, beginning at approximately 1:30 p.m., will 
be closed to the public. Because of the desire to keep the final 
selection of the NPC award winners confidential until they are 
officially notified and the awards are announced, disclosure of the 
NPC's deliberations and final selection of award winners would 
significantly frustrate implementation of the awards program.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Douglas K. Walker, National 
Partnership Council, Executive Secretariat, Office of Personnel 
Management, Theodore Roosevelt Building, 1900 E Street, NW., 

[[Page 64083]]
Room 5315, Washington, DC 20415-0001, (202) 606-1000.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We invite interested persons and 
organizations to submit written comments. Mail or deliver your comments 
to Mr. Douglas K. Walker at the address shown above. Written comments 
should be received by December 8 in order to be considered at the 
December 13 meeting.

Office of Personnel Management.
James B. King,
Director.

[FR Doc. 95-30296 Filed 12-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-01-M
```
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 4, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 480]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-34]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-28,992; TA-W-28,992A]

New London Oil, Inc. and Well Solutions, Inc., San Antonio, TX; 
Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Notice of Certification 
Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on 
October 25, 1993. The notice was published in the Federal Register on 
November 9, 1993 (58 FR 59492).
    At the request of the State Agency, the Department has reviewed the 
subject certification and is amending it by including all former 
workers of Well Solutions, Inc., San Antonio, Texas, a wholly owned 
subsidiary whose workers worked primarily at the wellsite for 
unaffiliated firms in the oil and gas industry. Well Solutions, Inc., 
was sold on November 30, 1994 when all the remaining workers were laid 
off.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of New London Oil, Inc., and its former wholly owned 
subsidiary, Well Solutions, Inc.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-28,992 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of New London Oil, Inc., San Antonio, Texas and 
Well Solutions, Inc., San Antonio, Texas who became totally or 
partially separated from employment on or after August 30, 1992 are 
eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the 
Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of December 1994.
Victor J. Trunzo,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-34 Filed 1-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
```