alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 2, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 20]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31517]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
50 CFR Part 675

[Docket No. 950905226-5282-02; I.D. 122695A]
RIN 0648-AH00


Groundfish Fishery of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Area; 
Extension of Allocations to Inshore and Offshore Components; Correction

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Correcting amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to the final rule (I.D. 
083095A) that was published Tuesday, December 12, 1995, (60 FR 63654). 
The regulation related to an extension of the allocation of pollock for 
processing by the inshore and offshore components from January 1, 1996 
through December 31, 1998.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 1, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Ham, 907-586-7228.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

Need for Publication

    At 60 FR 63654, December 12, 1995, a final rule to extend the 
inshore-offshore and Community Development Quota programs in the Bering 
Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area for 3 years, from January 1, 
1996, through December 31, 1998, was published. Unintentionally, in 
that final rule, a paragraph was excluded from an extension of the 
expiration date and is corrected here.

List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 675

    Fisheries, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: December 26, 1995.
Gary Matlock,
Program Management Officer, National Marine Fisheries Service.

PART 675--GROUNDFISH OF THE BERING SEA AND ALEUTIAN ISLANDS AREA

    Accordingly, 50 CFR part 675 is corrected by making the following 
correcting amendment:
    1. The authority citation for part 675 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    2. Section 675.25 paragraph (b) heading is revised to read as 
follows:


Sec. 675.25  Observer requirements.

* * * * *
    (b) Additional observer coverage requirements applicable through 
December 31, 1998. * * *
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 95-31517 Filed 12-29-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8348-8349]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3651]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Financial Assistance Award: Dr. John V. Milewski

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy announces that pursuant to 10 
CFR 600.6(a)(2) it is making a financial assistance award under Grant 
Number DE-FG01-95EE15632 to Dr. John V. Milewski of Superkinetic, Inc. 
The proposed grant will provide funding in the estimated amount of 
$98,000 by the Department of Energy for the purpose of saving energy 
through development of Dr. Milewski's ``Hafnium Carbide Single Crystal 
Fiber for Ceramic Cutting Tool Reinforcement'' composite material 
technology for the production of superior metal cutting and machining 
tools through the use of reinforcing whiskers in the cutting component. 
This method is superior over currently used [[Page 8349]] silicon 
carbide and tungsten carbide reinforcement technology in that it is 
applicable for machining ferrous materials and it uses plentiful raw 
materials with superior high temperature properties.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department of Energy has determined in 
accordance with 10 CFR 600.14(e)(1) that the unsolicited application 
for financial assistance submitted by Dr. John V. Milewski is 
meritorious based on the general evaluation required by 10 CFR 
600.14(d) and the proposed project represents a unique idea that would 
not be eligible for financial assistance under a recent, current or 
planned solicitation. Estimates indicate a ten- to twenty-fold 
improvement in machining productivity can be expected from the use of 
this technology. The proposed project is not eligible for financial 
assistance under a recent, current or planned solicitation because the 
funding program, the Energy Related Invention Program (ERIP), has been 
structured since its beginning in 1975 to operate without competitive 
solicitations because the authorizing legislation directs ERIP to 
provide support for worthy ideas submitted by the public. The program 
has never issued and has no plans to issue a competitive solicitation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Please write the U.S. Department of 
Energy, Office of Placement and Administration, ATTN: Rose Mason, HR-
531.23, 1000 Independence Ave., S.W., Washington, D.C. 20585.
    The anticipated term of the proposed grant is 18 months from the 
date of award.

    Issued in Washington, D.C. on January 30, 1995.
Richard G. Lewis,
Contracting Officer, Office of Placement and Administration.
[FR Doc. 95-3651 Filed 2-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1099

PETER R. SUTHERLAND, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus AUTUMN CORPORATION, d/b/a Autumn Care of Saluda, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Shelby. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CA-98-270-4-T) Submitted: May 31, 2001 Decided: June 29, 2001 Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Peter R. Sutherland, Appellant Pro Se. James Columcille Dever, III, MAUPIN, TAYLOR & ELLIS, P.A., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Peter R. Sutherland appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of his former employer, Autumn Corporation, in his civil action alleging retaliatory discharge in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 12101-12213 (West 1995 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Sutherland v. Autumn Corp. , No. CA-98-270-4-T (W.D.N.C. Dec. 14, 2000). Further, we deny Sutherland’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

 

 

 

 

# **ACCOUNTANT’S CONSENT**

 

 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein the Registration Statements on Form S-8 of HF Financial Corp., pertaining tothe HF Financial Corp.  1991 StockOption and Incentive Plan, the 1996 Director Restricted Stock Plan, and theRetirement Savings Plan of our report dated August 15, 2002, accompanying theconsolidated financial statements included in the Form 10-K Annual Report of HFFinancial Corp. for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002.

 

/s/McGladrey & Pullen, LLP

 

 

Sioux Falls, South Dakota

September 26, 2002
EXHIBIT 32.1

       CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NASB Financial, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, David H. Hancock, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.


August 9, 2007              By: /s/ David H. Hancock
                               David H. Hancock
                               Chairman and Chief
                                 Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to NASB Financial, Inc. and will be retained by NASB
Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.


This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein , and not for
any other purpose.

<Page>
#### Attorney General v. Continental Life Insurance Company.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Daniels, J.
**Exhibit
      32**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Remote Knowledge, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Randy S.
      Bayne, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and D. Henry Houston, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to and solely
      for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge and belief,
      that:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
                November 14, 2007/s/
                Randy S. BayneRandy
                S. BayneChief
                Executive Officer/s/
                D. Henry HoustonD.
                Henry HoustonChief
                Financial Officer
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 32 (Thursday, February 16, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9041]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3880]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Agency For Health Care Policy And Research

Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (5 U.S.C., Appendix 2) announcement is made of the following 
special emphasis panel scheduled to meet during the month of March 
1995:

    Name: Health Care Policy and Research Special Emphasis Panel
    Date and Time: March 27, 1995 10:30 a.m.
    Place: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Executive 
Office Center, 2101 East Jefferson Street, 6th Floor Conference 
Room, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    Open session 10:30 a.m.-10:45 a.m., closed for remainder of 
meeting.
    Purpose: This panel is charged with conducting the initial 
review of grant applications for Federal support of conferences, 
workshops, meetings, or projects related to dissemination and 
utilization of research findings, and AHCPR liaison with health care 
policymakers, providers, and consumers.
    Agenda: The open session of the meeting on March 27 from 10:30 
a.m. to 10:45 a.m. will be devoted to a business meeting covering 
administrative matters. During the closed session, the committee 
will be reviewing grant applications dealing with dissemination of 
research on the organization, costs, and efficiency of health care. 
In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C., 
Appendix 2 and 5 U.S.C., 552b(c)(6), the Administrator, AHCPR, has 
made a formal determination that this latter session will be closed 
because the discussions are likely to reveal personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the grant applications. This 
information is exempt from mandatory disclosure.

    Anyone wishing to obtain a roster of members or other relevant 
information should contact Linda Blankenbaker, Agency for Health Care 
and Policy Research, Suite 602, 2101 East Jefferson Street, Rockville, 
Maryland 20852, Telephone (301) 594-1438.
    Agenda items for this meeting are subject to change as priorities 
dictate.

    Dated: February 9, 1995.
Clifton R. Gaus,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 95-3880 Filed 2-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-P
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Richard A. Waldron, Chief Financial Officer of SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(the "Registrant"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based
on my knowledge:

      (1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant, to which this
      certification is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Registrant.

Date:  March 26, 2003                                /s/ Richard A. Waldron
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                       Richard A. Waldron
                                                     Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by SciClone
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 0.08 0.12 2% 3%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

September 15, 2023

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Level of Monthly Benefits

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: B7.8. Replace the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) and Government Pension 

Offset (GPO) with a revised reduction for most OASI benefits based on all earnings, beginning with 

beneficiaries newly eligible in 2030.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision
1

Filed 6/16/2014 In re F.F. C A 1/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

In re F.F.

,

on Habeas Corpus. A141763

( Super ior Ct. of the City & County of

S an Francisco No. JW 13

- 6182 )

BY THE COURT 1 :

Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus arguing that the trial court

improperly found him in violation of probation

. We asked for and received informal

op position and reply. In the informal opposition, the Attorney General concedes error

and asks that we vacate the offending order. Additionally, the parties have waived

issuance of an order to show cause, the filing of a return and traverse, and oral argum ent

and stipulates to the immediate issuance of the remittitur. ( Cal. Rules of Court, ru les

8. 27 2 (c), 8.490.)

The concession by the Attorney General is appropriate. Welfare and Institutions

Code section 777 2 provides that “an order changing or modifying a previous order . . .

shall be made only after a noticed hearing.” In this case , without prior notice, the trial

court changed its prior order of probation when it found petitioner in violation of

1 Before Kline, P.J., Richman, J., and Brick, J.*

*Judge of the Alameda County Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to

article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.

2 All further statutory references are to the Welfare a nd Institutions Code.2

probation and removed him from his home

. This was contr ary to the plain dictates of

section 777 . Given that the proper procedure was not followed, the petition for writ of

habeas corpus is granted and the probation violation is hereby vacated.

The clerk of the court is instructed to issue the remittitur fort hwith.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3833 

To end the antitrust safe harbor for baseball cartels. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 14, 2022 

Mr. SANDERS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To end the antitrust safe harbor for baseball cartels. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Save American Base5 ball Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds the following: 

8 (1) Major League Baseball is an organization 

9 controlled by a number of billionaires who are more 

10 concerned with increasing their wealth and profits 

11 than with strengthening our national pastime. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3833 IS

1 (2) Recently, Major League Baseball has ex2 ploited its monopoly control over America’s pastime 

3 and hurt players, families, and communities to in4 crease their already high level of profits. 

5 (3) In December 2021, Major League Baseball 

6 locked players out and refused to bargain in good 

7 faith in an attempt to break the players’ union. 

8 (4) In March 2022, Major League Baseball 

9 threatened players with a delay of the 2022 baseball 

10 season to force them into an unfair contract deal. 

11 (5) The actions of Major League Baseball have 

12 not only threatened players, but also the livelihood 

13 of thousands of stadium workers and communities 

14 across the United States. 

15 (6) In 2021, Major League Baseball revoked 

16 the affiliation of more than 40 Minor League Base17 ball teams, causing needless economic pain and suf18 fering and breaking the hearts of fans in small- and 

19 mid-sized towns all over the United States. 

20 (7) Rising Major League Baseball ticket prices 

21 are increasingly unaffordable for working class fami22 lies. 

23 (8) The anticompetitive grip of Major League 

24 Baseball on the sport, its players, its workers, and 

25 its communities must end. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3833 IS

1 SEC. 3. DEFINITION. 

2 In this Act, the term ‘‘antitrust laws’’— 

3 (1) has the meaning given the term in sub4 section (a) of the first section of the Clayton Act (15 

5 U.S.C. 12); and 

6 (2) includes section 5 of the Federal Trade 

7 Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 45) to the extent that 

8 such section applies to unfair methods of competi9 tion. 

10 SEC. 4. PROFESSIONAL BASEBALL SUBJECT TO ANTITRUST 

11 LAWS. 

12 (a) REMOVAL OF EXEMPTION.—Persons in the busi13 ness of organized professional baseball shall not be exempt 

14 from the antitrust laws. 

15 (b) REPEAL.—Section 27 of the Clayton Act (15 

16 U.S.C. 26b) is repealed. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### THOMAS A. CROOM v. J. N. BRYANT.

(Filed 14 December, 1927.)

Appeal by defendant from *Bond, J.,*at February Term, 1927, of New HaNovee.

Civil action brought by plaintiff, a broker, to recover of defendant, owner, commissions for the sale of a lot of land alleged to be due under a contract of agency.

Upon denial of liability and issue joined, the jury returned the following verdict:

“Is the defendant Bryant indebted to the plaintiff Croom, and if so, in what amount? Answer: Tes, to amount as set out in complaint.”

From a judgment on the verdict in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant for $587.50, the amount demanded in the complaint, the defendant appeals, assigning errors.

*J. Gr. McCormick for plaintiff.*

*Nathan Oole and W. F. Jones for defendant.*

Pee OubiaM.

The contract of agency is not seriously questioned, though it is contended that the power of agency, being revocable as it was not coupled with an interest, was revoked before the plaintiff produced a purchaser ready, able and willing to take the property, and who did later purchase it direct from the owner, defendant herein. This was purely a question of fact which the jury has determined in favor of the plaintiff. The law of the case is settled in *Auction Co. v. Brittain,*182 N. C., 676, 110 S. E., 82; *House v. Abell, ibid.,*619, 109 S. E., 877; *Aycock v. Bogue, ibid.,*105, 108 S. E., 434.

No error.