alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 246 (Friday, December 22, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 66579]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31259]



                Sunshine Act Meetings



Federal Register:  /  Vol. 60, No. 246  /  Friday, December 22, 1995  
/  Sunshine Act Meetings

[[Page 66579]]

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

Notice of Change in Subject Matter of Agency Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of subsection (e)(2) of the ``Government 
in the Sunshine Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(2)), notice is hereby given 
that at its open meeting held at 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, December 19, 
1995, the Corporation's Board of Directors determined, on motion of 
Vice Chairman Andrew C. Hove, Jr., seconded by Director Eugene A. 
Ludwig (Comptroller of the Currency), concurred in by Director Jonathan 
L. Fiechter (Acting Director, Office of Thrift Supervision), that 
Corporation business required the addition to the agenda for 
consideration at the meeting, on less than seven days' notice to the 
public, of a personnel matter.
    By the same majority vote, the Board further determined that no 
earlier notice of the change in the subject matter of the meeting was 
practicable.

    Dated: December 20, 1995.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Robert E. Feldman,

Deputy Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95-31259 Filed 12-20-95; 3:28 pm]

BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
```
**EXHIBIT 10.93**

 

**AMENDMENT TO STOCK PLEDGE AGREEMENT**

 

**THIS AMENDMENT TO STOCK PLEDGE AGREEMENT** is made and entered into as of the 12th day of April, 2002, by and between **JEFFREY A. ALLRED** (the “Pledgor”) and **PTEK HOLDINGS, INC.**, a Georgia corporation (the“Secured Party”). 

 

**W I T N E S S E T H**

 

**WHEREAS,** the Pledgor and the Secured Party enteredinto that certain Stock Pledge Agreement as of January 3, 2002 (the “Original Agreement”); and 

 

**WHEREAS,** the Pledgor and the Secured Party desire to amend the Original Agreement as set forth herein; and 

 

**WHEREAS,** capitalized terms that are not defined herein shall have themeanings ascribed to them in the Original Agreement; 

 

**NOW,THEREFORE,** for and in consideration of the premises and the agreements and covenants contained herein, the parties hereby amend the Original Agreement as follows: 

 

1. The third **“WHEREAS”** clause is deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following:

 

“**WHEREAS,** the Pledgor may deliveradditional Promissory Notes to the Secured Party pursuant to the terms of the RSA Agreement (such Promissory Notes and the Note are referred to collectively herein as the “Secured Notes); and 

 

**WHEREAS,** to secure the payment of all obligations ofthe Pledgor under the Secured Notes, the Pledgor has agreed to pledge to the Secured Party, and to grant the Secured Party a security interest in, all of the Shares;”. 

 

2. The second sentence of Section 1 is deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following: 

 

“The Pledgor has delivered to and deposited with the Secured Party oneor more certificates representing the Shares and stock powers endorsed in blank, as security for payment of (i) all obligations of the Pledgor to the Secured Party under the Note, and any extension, renewal, amendment or modification thereof, (ii)all obligations of the Pledgor to the Secured Party under subsequent Secured Notes, and any extension, renewal, amendment or modification thereof, and (iii) all obligations of the Pledgor to the Secured Party hereunder.” 

 

3. The first sentence of Section 3 is amended by deleting“the Note” in the first line and replacing it with “a Secured Note.” 

 

4. Section 6 of the Original Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 

 

“**6. Return of Shares to Pledgor.**Upon payment infull of all principal and interest on all of the Secured Notes, this Agreement shall terminate and the Secured Party shall return to the Pledgor all of the then remaining Shares.” 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF,** the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be entered into as of the dayand year first above written. 

 
**PLEDGOR:**
/s/ Jeffrey A. Allred

Jeffrey A. Allred
   
 

 

**SECURED PARTY:**

 

****PTEK Holdings, Inc.
By: /s/ Patrick G. Jones   
Patrick G. Jones

Executive VicePresident
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 4 (Friday, January 6, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 2098]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-325]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. FA92-8-000]


Pennsylvania Power & Light Company; Order Establishing Hearing 
Procedures

December 30, 1994.
    On November 8, 1994, the Chief Accountant issued a letter under 
delegated authority noting Pennsylvania Power & Light Company's (PP&L) 
disagreement with respect to certain recommendations of the Division of 
Audits.\1\ PP&L was requested to advise whether it would agree to the 
disposition of the contested matters under the shortened procedures 
provided for by Part 41 of the Commission's Regulations. 18 CFR Part 
41.

    \1\69 FERC  62, 135. The contested matters are the three items 
discussed in Part I of the letter order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    By letter dated December 6, 1994, PP&L responded that it did not 
consent to the shortened procedures. Section 41.7 of the Commission's 
Regulations provides that in case consent to the shortened procedures 
is not given, the proceeding will be assigned for hearing. Accordingly, 
the Secretary, under authority delegated by the Commission, will set 
the matters for hearing.
    Any interested person seeking to participate in this docket shall 
file a protest or motion to intervene pursuant to Rules 211 and 214 of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214) no later than 15 days after the date of publication of this 
order in the Federal Register.
    It is ordered:
    (A) Pursuant to the authority contained in and subject to the 
jurisdiction conferred upon the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission by 
section 402(a) of the Department of Energy Organization Act, the 
provisions of the Federal Power Act, particularly sections 205, 206, 
and 301 thereof, and pursuant to the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedures (18 CFR Chapter I), a public hearing shall be held 
concerning the appropriateness of PP&L's practices as referred to 
above.
    (B) A Presiding Administrative Law Judge, to be designated by the 
Chief Administrative Law Judge, shall convene a prehearing conference 
in this proceeding, to be held within 45 days of the date of this 
order, in a hearing room of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 
810 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 10416. The Presiding Judge is 
authorized to establish procedural dates and to rule on all motions 
(except motions to dismiss) as provided in the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure.
    (C) This order shall be published in the Federal Register.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-325 Filed 1-5-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
., 

. . 

..’ 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

, 

‘: Mr. Charleo R. 

.: county Auditor 

E;artin 

. . xarrl8on county 

‘. Mar8hal1, Texar 

: Dear Sir: Opinion No. O-6712 

In 

partment , 

aet out in 

burlnear of any oounty however employed to knowingly use or 

lrpowingly permit to be used for private proiit to hlneelf any 

P 

roperty, suppllea, equipment and other things of value belongng to euoh oounty end likewise the labor or aervloo of any 

prson whose labor or eervico is paid for by such oounty. 
. 

. 

‘. 

. 

496 

lir. Charloa R. :'artin, Pais. 2 

mtlolea 2351, 6727, 0728, 6746, 6747, 6751, 6753, 6766, 

6771, 6772, and 6161, of Vornon'a Annotatad ~;iril btatutaa of 

Taxaa provlda in aubatanoa that the oounty oommlaalonera ahall 

lay Out and 88tatll8h, Ohanga and dlaoo~tirrua yubllo road8 and 

hlghnay8, build brld&ca and keep them ir. repair. 

Tha paaaa~a of the above panal law did not alter, ohaqe 

or aftaot the powura and dutlaa OS the oopiJlaalonera~ oourt am 

flxad by tha Oonatltutlon and Statut#a. 

It la the opl~lon OS thla dapartneot that your kuomtion 

I rhould be and la hereby anawerrd fn tha ncgatlve. 

You8 very truly,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

MARY F. KODENKANDETH,

Petitioner

v.

DR. DAVID N. WESSEL, D.M.D.,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 3 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23rd day of July, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal and

the Application for Leave to Rebut Respondent’s Answer Containing Misrepresentations

are DENIED

.
|CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in the  Registration  Statements  (Form S-8 Nos.  33-87908,
333-18347,  333-55821,  333-57580,  333-115719 and  333-144727)  of our reports dated March 5, 2010,  with
respect  to  the  consolidated  financial  statements  of  Palomar  Medical  Technologies,  Inc.  and  the
effectiveness  of internal  control  over  financial  reporting  of Palomar  Medical  Technologies,  Inc.,
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2009.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                      |                      
|--------------------- | ---------------------
|
|                      | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|Boston, Massachusetts |                      
|March 5, 2010         |                      

|
|
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 26, 2011 

h1019 

Order 

 

October 26, 2011 

142368 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142368 

 COA: 290765 

Genesee CC: 08-023682-FC 

KERRICK SHAFRAN FARQUHARSON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 16, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
### Proposed Provision: A8. Starting December 2024, for OASI beneficiaries only (DI beneficiaries would only be affected when their benefit converts to OASI at NRA), the annual COLA would be based on the chain-weighted version of the CPI-U.

back
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 367 

To authorize the President to award the Medal of Honor to James Megellas, 

formerly of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, and most recently of Colleyville, 

Texas, before his death on April 2, 2020, for acts of valor on January 

28, 1945, during the Battle of the Bulge in World War II. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 23, 2021 

Mr. JOHNSON (for himself, Mr. CORNYN, and Ms. BALDWIN) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Armed Services 

A BILL 

To authorize the President to award the Medal of Honor 

to James Megellas, formerly of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, 

and most recently of Colleyville, Texas, before his death 

on April 2, 2020, for acts of valor on January 28, 

1945, during the Battle of the Bulge in World War 

II. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 367 IS

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION FOR AWARD OF THE MEDAL 

2 OF HONOR TO JAMES MEGELLAS FOR ACTS 

3 OF VALOR DURING BATTLE OF THE BULGE. 

4 (a) WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.—Notwith5 standing the time limitations specified in section 7274 of 

6 title 10, United States Code, or any other time limitation 

7 with respect to the awarding of certain medals to persons 

8 who served in the Armed Forces, the President may award 

9 the Medal of Honor under section 7271 of such title to 

10 James Megellas, formerly of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, and 

11 most recently of Colleyville, Texas, before his death on 

12 April 2, 2020, for the acts of valor during World War II 

13 described in subsection (b). 

14 (b) ACTS OF VALOR DESCRIBED.—The acts of valor 

15 referred to in subsection (a) are the actions of James 

16 Megellas on January 28, 1945, in Herresbach, Belgium, 

17 during the Battle of the Bulge when, as a first lieutenant 

18 in the 82nd Airborne Division, he led a surprise and dev19 astating attack on a much larger advancing enemy force, 

20 killing and capturing a large number and causing others 

21 to flee, single-handedly destroying an attacking German 

22 Mark V tank with two hand-held grenades, and then lead23 ing his men in clearing and seizing Herresbach. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
## Detailed Single Year Tables

- Individual Provisions
- Level of Monthly Benefits

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						B3.12: Use an annualized "mini-PIA" formula beginning with retired workers newly eligible in 2030. For each indexed earnings year, compute an individual AIME and an individual PIA. Sum these individual PIAs for the 40 highest years of indexed earnings and divide that total amount by 37 to get the PIA for this provision. Phase-in over five years, meaning that in 2030, 80 percent of the benefit would be based on the old 35-year average PIA formula and 20 percent on the new mini-PIA formula, shifting by 20 percentage points each year until 100 percent is based on the new mini-PIA formula for those attaining age 62 in 2034. Disabled worker benefits are unchanged under this provision.**

### Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program

### Summarized Estimates
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Acorn Energy, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael
Barth, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





/s/MICHAEL
      BARTHMichael
      BarthChief
      Financial OfficerMarch
      22, 2010
**Exhibit 32**
**CERTIFICATION**
The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:
(1) The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.     Date: May 14, 2004  /s/ Mark N. Schwartz       Chief Executive Officer     Date: May 14, 2004  /s/ James S. Murphy       Chief Financial Officer
26
<PAGE>   1


                                                                     EXHIBIT 12


                              MCA FINANCIAL CORP.
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                   Year ended January 31,
                                   --------------------------------------------------------   
                                     1997        1996        1995         1994        1993
                                   ------      ------      -------       -----      -------    
<S>                              <C>          <C>         <C>          <C>         <C>
Income (Loss) Before Federal
 Income Taxes .................  $ 1,404,338  $1,127,530  $ (175,162)  $  972,185  $  915,602

Add:
Portion of Rents
 Representative of
 the Interest Factor ..........      273,840     216,360     134,075       72,234      57,265
Interest on Indebtedness ......   11,426,082   7,565,044   6,018,518    4,428,925     962,439
Amortization of
 Debt Expense .................      957,956     687,390     421,189      286,009     102,675
                                 -----------  ----------  ----------   ----------  ----------

                                 $14,062,216  $9,596,324  $6,398,620   $5,759,353  $2,037,981
                                 ===========  ==========  ==========   ==========  ==========

Fixed Charges:
Portion of Rents
 Representative of
 the Interest Factor ..........  $   273,840  $  216,360  $  134,075   $   72,234  $   57,265
Interest on Indebtedness ......   11,426,082   7,565,044   6,018,518    4,428,925     962,439
Amortization of Debt Expense ..      957,956     687,390     421,189      286,009     102,675
                                 -----------  ----------  ----------   ----------  ----------
                                 $12,657,878  $8,468,794  $6,573,782   $4,787,168  $1,122,379
                                 ===========  ==========  ==========   ==========  ==========

Ratio of Earnings
 to Fixed Charges .............         1.11        1.13         ---         1.20        1.82

Deficiency of Earnings
 over Fixed Charges ...........  $        --  $       --  $ (175,162)  $       --  $      ---
</TABLE>
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 0.55 0.48 15% 11%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

September 15, 2023

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable)

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: E3.18. Increase the taxable maximum linearly over 4 years to $279,900 for 2028. 

After 2028, index the taxable maximum to AWI plus 0.5 percentage point. Apply benefit credit on additional 

earnings taxed.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
connection with the Annual Report of UTEC, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
“Company”), on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Fortunato
Villamagna, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my
knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Fortunato
Villamagna


Fortunato
Villamagna, CEO


Dated:
 April 14, 2010
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-10-00248-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF B.M.R., a Child

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2008-PA-01762

Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 24, 2010

AFFIRMED

After the trial court terminated his parental rights, Robert R. appealed the trial court’s 

order finding that an appeal of the termination order would be frivolous. See TEX. FAM. CODE 

ANN. § 263.405(g) (West 2008). Robert’s court-appointed appellate attorney filed a brief 

containing a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating that there are no arguable 

grounds to be advanced. Counsel concludes that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The 

brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). See In re R.R., No. 

04-03-00096-CV, 2003 WL 21157944, at *4 (Tex. App.—San Antonio May 21, 2003, no pet.) 

(applying Anders procedure in appeal from termination of parental rights) (mem. op.); see also In 

re K.M., 98 S.W.3d 774, 775 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2003, order) (same).
04-10-00248-CV

- 2 -

Counsel certified that a copy of his brief was delivered to Robert who was advised of his 

right to examine the record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed. After 

reviewing the record, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgment of 

the trial court is therefore affirmed, and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. 

Rebecca Simmons, Justice