alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3655 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3655

 To amend the Civil Rights Cold Case Records Collection Act of 2018 to 
   extend the termination date of the Civil Rights Cold Case Records 
                             Review Board.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 16, 2022

 Mr. Ossoff (for himself and Mr. Cruz) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Civil Rights Cold Case Records Collection Act of 2018 to 
   extend the termination date of the Civil Rights Cold Case Records 
                             Review Board.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Civil Rights Cold Case 
Investigations Support Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. CIVIL RIGHTS COLD CASE RECORDS REVIEW BOARD EXTENSION OF 
              TENURE.

    Section 5(n)(1) of Civil Rights Cold Case Records Collection Act of 
2018 (44 U.S.C. 2107 note; Public Law 115-426) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``4 years'' and inserting ``7 years''; and
            (2) by striking ``4-year period'' and inserting ``7-year 
        period''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 29 (Monday, February 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 8223]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3551]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Yakima Training Center Cultural and Natural Resources Committee--
Technical Committee

AGENCY: HQ, I CORPS & Fort Lewis, DOD.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following 
committee meeting:

    Name of Committee: Yakima Training Center Cultural and Natural 
Resources Committee--Technical Committee.
    Date of Meeting: March 16, 1995.
    Place: Yakima Training Center, Building 266, Yakima, Washington.
    Time: 1:00 p.m.
    Proposed Agenda: Cultural and Natural Resources Management Plan 
development.
    All proceedings are open. For further information contact 
Stephen Hart, Chief, Civil Law, (206) 967-4540.
Kenneth L. Denton,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-3551 Filed 2-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
#### Ulrich *v.*Matika, Appellant.

January, 13, 1906:

*Tax sales*— Ejectment—Evidence—Personal *property on premises.*

In an action of ejectment, where the defendant relies for title upon a tax sale, binding instructions cannot be given in his favor, where the testimony shows that during the period covered by the assessment of taxes for which the sale was made, there was sufficient personal property on the real estate sold to pay all the taxes assessed thereon, wliich might have been seized by the collector, if he had used due diligence.

Submitted Dec. 6, 1905.

Appeal, No. 293, Nov. T., 1901, by defendants, from judgment of C. P. Schuylkill Co., Nov. T., 1901, No. 293, on verdict for plaintiff in case of John O. Ulrich v. Mike Matika and Paul Richardson.

Before Rice, P. J.. Brewer, Orlady, Porter, Morrison and Henderson, JJ.

Affirmed.

Ejectment for land in the Borough of Gilberton. Before Shay, J.

At the trial it appeared that the defendant, Paul Richardson, claimed title under a tax sale. The evidence showed that there was sufficient personal property on the premises at the time of the assessment to pay all of the taxes levied.

The court refused binding instructions for defendant.

Verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appealed.

*Error assigned*was in refusing binding instructions for defendant.

*H. O.*Bechtel, *J. H. Rothstein*and *M. M. Burke,*for appellant.

*John O. Ulrich*and *A. W. Schalck,*for appellee.

Per Curiam,

Judging from the statements in the appellee’s paper-book, there are omitted from- the appellant’s paper-hook matters of record and of evidence which are essential to a proper review of the case. The matters referred to are the defendant’s an*111swer, filed in December, 1901, and full copies of the deed of the county treasurer to the county commissioners, and of the assignment or reassignment to Paul Richardson, the appellant, indorsed thereon. It was important that we should have these before us in order to pass upon the question, raised by the appellee, as to the redemption of the premises within two years from the date of the treasurer’s sale for the taxes of 1897-1899. As the case is presented in the appellant’s paper-book it is impossible, however, to pass upon that question intelligently, and therefore we express no opinion upon it. The appellant’s complaint is that the court erred in refusing to give binding instructions in his favor. But clearly the court would not have been warranted in.giving such instructions in the face of the testimony that during the period covered by the assessment of taxes for which the sale was made “ there was sufficient personal property on the real estate sold to pay all the taxes assessed thereon, which might have been seized by the collector, if he had used due diligence.” Section 2, Act of May 13, 1879, P. L. 55; Act of June 3, 1885, P. L. 71. This question of fact was submitted to the jury with instructions as to which no specific complaint is made, and their verdict for the plaintiff has established the faofc which prevented the divestiture of the title by the sale in question.

Judgment affirmed.
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual Balance 

in 75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

B

7

-1.70% -4.20% 1.18% 3.61% -0.52% 

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2008 Trustees Report Office of the Chief A

July 16, 2008

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Level of Monthly Benefits (PIA)

Proposed Provision: Progressive price indexing of PIA formula factors beginning with indivieligible for OASI benefits in 2015. Create new bend point at the 30th percentile of earners. law benefits for earners at the 30th percentile and below and reduce upper 2 formula factorsuch that maximum worker benefit grows by inflation rather than the growth in average wagbenefits are not affected by the proposal. Disabled worker beneficiaries, upon attaining noage, would be subject to a proportional reduction in benefits based on the worker's years o

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this 

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

0.02.04.06.08.0

10.012.014.016.018.020.0

2008 2018 2028 2038 2048 2058 2068 2078

Year

Percent

Cost rates with this provisionCost rates under present lawIncome rates with this provisionIncome rates under present law

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

 (assets as a percentage of annual expe

0

100200300400500600700800900

1000

2008 2018 2028 2038 2048 2058 

Year

Percent

Present law With this p
#### In the Matter of the Will of FLORENCE FELTON GUTHRIE, Deceased.

(Filed 30 September, 1925.)

Appeal by caveator from *Barnhill, J.,*at January Term, 1925, of Carteret. No error.

Caveat filed by James "W. Guthrie, husband of deceased, to paper-writing propounded as the last will and testament of'Florence Felton *856Guthrie.' Upon appropriate issues, there was a verdict that the execution of the paper-writing was not procured by undue influence; that deceased had mental capacity, at date of execution of same, sufficient to make a valid will; and that the paper-writing propounded, and every part thereof, was the last will and testament of Mrs. Florence Felton Guthrie. From judgment upon this verdict, caveator appealed.

*Luther Hamilton for propounders. ■*

*A. B. Morris and Ward & Ward for caveator.*

Pee Cueiam.

We find no error in the rulings of the court upon the admission or rejection of evidence, or in instructions given to the jury in the charge of the court. Both are sustained by the decisions of this Court. The exceptions were not well taken; assignments of error based thereon are not sustained.

We note the suggestion in the brief of counsel for caveator relative to the issues submitted. He expressed the opinion that only one issue should be submitted in a proceeding for the probate of a will in solemn form. However, there were no exceptions to the issues as submitted in this case. This Court has approved these issues, and no reason appears to us why the issues approved in the *Herring Will Case,*152 N. C., 258, are not proper, when undue influence and want of mental capacity are relied upon by *k*caveator. There is

No error.
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 0.69 0.40 19% 9%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

September 15, 2023

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable)

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: E3.1. Increase the taxable maximum such that 90 percent of earnings would be 

subject to the payroll tax (phased in 2024-2033). Provide benefit credit for earnings up to the revised 

taxable maximum.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision
**Exhibit32**

 

**CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

**ChiefExecutive Officer Certification**

 

The certificationset forth below is being submitted in connection with Amendment No. 1 to theForm 10-K (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) orRule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) andSection 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

 

R. Jack DeCrane,the Chief Executive Officer and Richard J. Kaplan, the Chief Financial Officerof DeCrane Aircraft Holdings, Inc., each certifies that, to the best of hisknowledge:

 

1.                           theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Exchange Act; and

 

2.                           theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of DeCrane Aircraft Holdings,Inc.

 

Date:October 9, 2003

 

 
|   | /s/  R. JACK DECRANE                        |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------|
|   | R. Jack DeCrane                                  |
|   | Chief Executive  Officer                         |
|   |                                             |
|   |                                             |
|   | /s/  RICHARD J. KAPLAN                      |
|   | Richard J.  Kaplan                               |
|   | Senior Vice  President, Chief Financial Officer, |
|   | Secretary and  Treasurer                         |

 

----
EXHIBIT 31.2CERTIFICATIONI, Frederick K. Minturn, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MSX International, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) designed such internal controls over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal controls over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting andthe preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisquarterly report based on such evaluation; and  d) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: May 17, 2006/s/ Frederick K. Minturn
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials and Translational Research Advisory Committee, March 09, 2016, 11:00 a.m. to March 09, 2016, 01:00 p.m., National Cancer Institute, Shady Grove, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD, 20850 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on January 26, 2016, 81 FR 4321.                

The meeting notice is amended to change the location of the meeting from the National Cancer Institute, Shady Grove, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD, 20850 to the National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, 20892, Building 31, C-Wing, 6th Floor, Room 10. The meeting is open to the public.

Dated: February 1, 2016.

Melanie J. Gray,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2016-02187 Filed 2-4-16; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9693]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4116]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Division of Research Grants; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
Division of Research Grants Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meetings:

    Purpose/Agenda: To review individual grant applications.

    Name of SEP: Behavioral and Neurosciences.
    Date: March 10, 1995.
    Time: 2:00 p.m.
    Place: NIH, Westwood Building, Room 306 Telephone Conference.
    Contact Person: Dr. Carol Campbell, Scientific Review 
Administrator, 5333 Westbard Ave., Room 306, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
(301) 594-7165.

    Name of SEP: Chemistry and Related Sciences.
    Date: March 13, 1995.
    Time: 8:30 a.m.
    Place: Holiday Inn, Chevy Chase, MD.
    Contact Person: Dr. John Beisler, Scientific Review 
Administrator, 5333 Westbard Ave., Room 334A, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
(301) 594-7149.

    Purpose/Agenda: To review Small Business Innovation Research 
Program grant applications.
    Name of SEP: Multidisciplinary Sciences.
    Date: March 23-24, 1995.
    Place: Embassy Suites, Washington, DC.
    Contact Person: Dr. Eileen Bradley, Scientific Review 
Administrator, 5333 Westbard Ave., Room 2A10, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
(301) 594-7391.

    The meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. Applications 
and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the applications 
and/or proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by 
the grant review cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institute of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 14, 1995.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 95-4116 Filed 2-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### J. T. MORTON v. G. T. WALTON.

(Filed 12 October, 1927.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *Sinclair, J.,*at April Term, 1927, of ONslow.

Affirmed.

*N. E. Bay and Cowper, Whitmher & Allen for plaintiff.*

*Summersill & Summersill and J ohn B. WarlicJc for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

Tbis was an action to recover damages for personal injury. Tbe plaintiff alleged that the defendant was engaged as overseer for the Onslow County road commission, and while building a certain road negligently left a stump in it, and that the car in which the plaintiff was traveling was driven against the stump, whereby the plaintiff was injured. At the conclusion of the evidence the action was dismissed as in case of nonsuit. We have carefully examined the record and are of opinion that it does not disclose a case of actionable negligence. The judgment is

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                                                 0000881695
<NAME>                        Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                   1
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         1,874,718
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 10,302,121
<ALLOWANCES>                                     364,000
<INVENTORY>                                    5,516,342
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              18,285,569
<PP&E>                                         7,709,986
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4,395,899
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                23,525,914
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         24,289,206
<BONDS>                                        3,150,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                           69
<COMMON>                                         705,240
<OTHER-SE>                                    (7,168,772)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  23,525,914
<SALES>                                       44,514,057
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              44,514,057
<CGS>                                         23,050,834
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 23,050,834
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  21,311
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,290,905
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (9,967,243)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (9,967,243)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (2,624,180)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (12,591,423)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.22)
        


</TABLE>