alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.11.2





 Exhibit 10.11.2 

 
 



 
 THE BENEFICIENT COMPANY GROUP, L.P. 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE BENEFICIENT COMPANY GROUP, L.P. 2018 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN: REU PLAN 

This First Amendment to The Beneficient Company Group, L.P. 2018 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Amendment”) is made effective as of December 29,
2019, by The Beneficient Company Group, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Company”). 
 WITNESSETH: 

WHEREAS, on September 25, 2018, the board of directors of the General Partner of the Company approved the adoption of The Beneficient Company Group, L.P.
2018 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); 
 WHEREAS, the Plan limits participation in the Plan to current directors, officers, employees,
consultants and other service providers of the Company and its affiliates; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company now desires to amend the Plan to allow for
participation in the Plan by former directors, officers, employees, consultants and other service providers of the Company and its affiliates; 
 NOW,
THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 
  

	1.	 Section 2(p) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:



  

	(p)	 Participant: A current or former director, officer, employee, consultant or other service
provider of the Partnership or of any of its Affiliates, including but not limited to any director of the General Partner, who is selected by the Administrator to participate in the Plan. 



 

	2.	 Except as otherwise specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Plan shall remain
in full force and effect. 


 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed on its behalf by its duly
authorized officer on the date set forth above. 
  

			
	THE BENEFICIENT COMPANY GROUP, L.P.
	
	By: Beneficient Management Group, L.L.C., its General Partner
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Brad Heppner

	Name:	 	Brad Heppner
	Title:	 	Chief Executive Officer


  
 1
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual Balance 

in 75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

B

7

-1.70% -4.20% 0.65% 1.03% -1.05% 

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2008 Trustees Report Office of the Chief A

November 13, 2008

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Level of Monthly Benefits (PIA)

Proposed Provision: Eliminate dropout years for OASI and DI computation of primary insur(PIA) for individuals newly eligible for benefits from 2010 to 2018. Specifically, for OASDI bcomputation, reduce the maximum number of drop-out years from 5 for benefit eligibility in decrease of 1 computation year in 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016, and 2018.

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this 

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

0.02.04.06.08.0

10.012.014.016.018.020.0

2008 2018 2028 2038 2048 2058 2068 2078

Year

Percent

Cost rates with this provisionCost rates under present lawIncome rates with this provisionIncome rates under present law

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

 (assets as a percentage of annual expe

0

100200300400500600700800900

1000

2008 2018 2028 2038 2048 2058 

Year

Percent

Present law With this p
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration

This is notice that on March 23, 2010, Stepan Company, Natural Products Department, 100 W. Hunter Avenue, Maywood, New Jersey 07607, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for registration as an importer of Coca Leaves (9040), a basic class of controlled substance listed in schedule II.

The company plans to import the listed controlled substance for the manufacture of a bulk controlled substance for distribution to its customer.

As explained in the Correction to Notice of Application pertaining to Rhodes Technologies, 72 FR 3417 (2007), comments and requests for hearings on applications to import narcotic raw material are not appropriate.

                    As noted in a previous notice published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 23, 1975, (40 FR 43745), all applicants for registration to import a basic class of any controlled substance in schedule I or II are, and will continue to be, required to demonstrate to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, that the requirements for such registration pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 958(a), 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and 21 CFR 1301.34(b), (c), (d), (e), and (f) are satisfied.                

Dated: May 28, 2010.

Joseph T. Rannazzisi,

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.

[FR Doc. 2010-13732 Filed 6-7-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual Balance 

in 75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

B

7

-1.70% -4.20% 0.15% 0.13% -1.55% 

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2008 Trustees Report Office of the Chief A

November 13, 2008

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Level of OASDI Contribution and Benefit Base

Proposed Provision: In 2009 through 2011, raise the OASDI contribution and benefit base f$110,000 (in 2008 AWI indexed dollars). For years after 2011, the contribution and benefit increased based on changes in SSA's average wage index. Additional earnings subject to tax would be credited for benefit calculation purposes.

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this 

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

0.02.04.06.08.0

10.012.014.016.018.020.0

2008 2018 2028 2038 2048 2058 2068 2078

Year

Percent

Cost rates with this provisionCost rates under present lawIncome rates with this provisionIncome rates under present law

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

 (assets as a percentage of annual expe

0

100200300400500600700800900

1000

2008 2018 2028 2038 2048 2058 

Year

Percent

Present law With this p
(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
 /s/ Lewis W. Dickey, Jr.Name:
    Lewis W. Dickey, Jr.Title:
    Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Joseph P. HannanName:
    Joseph P. HannanTitle:
    Senior Vice President, Treasurer and  Chief Financial Officer
VI 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3619 

For the relief of Vichai Sae Tung (also known as Chai Chaowasaree). 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2022 

Ms. HIRONO (for herself and Mr. SCHATZ) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Vichai Sae Tung (also known as Chai 

Chaowasaree). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE STATUS FOR VICHAI 

4 SAE TUNG. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi6 sion of law, for purposes of the Immigration and Nation7 ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Vichai Sae Tung (also 

8 known as Chai Chaowasaree) shall be held and considered 

9 to have been lawfully admitted to the United States for 

10 permanent residence as of the date of the enactment of 

11 this Act upon payment of the required visa fees. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3619 IS

1 (b) REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE

2 VISAS.—Upon the granting of permanent residence to 

3 Vichai Sae Tung (also known as Chai Chaowasaree) pur4 suant to subsection (a), the Secretary of State shall in5 struct the proper officer to reduce by one, during the cur6 rent or subsequent fiscal year, the total number of immi7 grant visas available to natives of the country of the alien’s 

8 birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nation9 ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)). 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATE OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERPursuant to Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code

The
undersigned, being the Principal Executive Officer of Enbridge Energy Management, L.L.C., the delegate of the general partner of Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P. (the "Partnership"), hereby
certifies that the Partnership's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated
March 28, 2003

|                                                                           |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ DAN C. TUTCHERDan C. Tutcher
President and Principal Executive Officer |  | 

---

QuickLinks
### Proposed Provision: H6. Eliminate federal income taxation of OASDI benefits that is credited to the OASI and DI Trust Funds for 2054 and later. Phase out OASDI taxation of benefits by increasing relevant "income" thresholds from 2045 through 2053 as follows, for single/joint tax filers:  (a) 2045 = $32,500/$65,000; (b) 2046 = $40,000/$80,000; (c) 2047 = $47,500/$95,000; (d) 2048 = $55,000/$110,000; (e) 2049 = $62,500/$125,000; (f) 2050 = $70,000/$140,000; (g) 2051 = $77,500/$155,000; (h) 2052 = $85,000/$170,000; and (i) 2053 = $92,500/$185,000.  Taxation of benefits revenues for the Hospital Insurance (HI) Trust Fund would be maintained at the same level as if the current-law computation applied.

back
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Mark N. Schwartz, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Hypertension Diagnostics, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;  4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the small business issuer, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’smost recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting; and 5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the smallbusiness issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting.                                                       /s/ Mark N. Schwartz   Mark N. Schwartz   Chief Executive Officer   Date: May 14, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 245 (Thursday, December 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 66322]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31074]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Minerals Management Service


Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) in the Royalty Management 
Program

AGENCY: Minerals Management Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of an EDI presentation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Minerals Management Service (MMS) is giving an Electronic 
Data Interchange (EDI) presentation in Fort Worth, Texas, on January 
25, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Barbara Y. Matthews, Systems 
Management Division, Minerals Management Service, Royalty Management 
Program, P. O. Box 25165 MS 3140, Denver, Colorado, 80225-0165, 
telephone numbers (800) 619-4593 or (303) 275-7036, FAX number (303) 
275-7099.

DATE: The EDI presentation is Thursday, January 25, 1996.

LOCATION: Burnett Building, Union Pacific Resource's Conference Room 
2983, 801 Cherry Street, Fort Worth, Texas. Cherry Street is located 
off of Interstate 30 (take the exit marked Cherry Street).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: MMS is offering an EDI presentation at no 
cost to companies and interested parties that intend to implement or 
pilot EDI with MMS. The EDI presentation will be held the day following 
the American Petroleum Institute (API), Petroleum Industry Data 
Exchange (PIDX) REGS Work Group meeting in Fort Worth, Texas. The API 
PIDX REGS Work Group meeting is scheduled for January 22-24, 1996. The 
EDI Presentation instructors are MMS employees of the Royalty 
Management Program, Systems Management Division.

    Agenda: Morning Session 9:00 a.m.-11:30 a.m.
    Instructor: Mr. Ron Hatton
    Subject: MMS EDI activities, capabilities, current status and 
implementation planning and schedules.
    Afternoon Session 1:00 p.m.-4:00 p.m.
    Instructor: Mr. Tim Allard
    Subject: EDI technical issues related to mapping and electronic 
exchange of regulatory data, and funds transmittal with MMS via EDI.

    All EDI Presentation attendees will be provided copies of the 
current MMS EDI Implementation Guides.
    If you are planning to attend this EDI Presentation, please leave a 
message for Barbara Matthews at the telephone and FAX numbers in the 
information contact section of this notice no later than January 17, 
1996.

    Dated: December 15, 1995.
James W. Shaw,
Associate Director for Royalty Management.
[FR Doc. 95-31074 Filed 12-20-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P
### Proposed Provision: B7.2. Reduce benefits by 5 percent for those newly eligible for benefits in 2024 and later.
Exhibit 4.3


 


CERTIFICATE OF
AMENDMENT

OF

CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION


 


Atlis Motor Vehicles Inc. a corporation
organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.


 


DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:


 


FIRST: That at a meeting of the Board of Directors
of Atlis Motor Vehicles Inc. resolutions were duly adopted setting forth a proposed amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation
of said corporation, declaring said amendment to be advisable and calling a meeting of the stockholders of said corporation for consideration
thereof. The resolution setting forth the proposed amendment is as follows:


 


RESOLVED, that the Certificate of Incorporation
of this corporation be amended by changing the Article thereof numbered “FOURTH:” so that, as amended said Article shall
be and read as follows:


 


“The total number of
shares of stock which the corporation is authorized to issue is 17,857,143 shares of common stock having a par value of $5.98 per share.”


 


SECOND: That thereafter, pursuant to resolution
of its Board of Directors, a special meeting of the stockholders of said corporation was duly called and held, upon notice in accordance
with Section 222 of the General Corporation law of the State of Delaware at which meeting the necessary number of shares as required
by statute were voted in favor of the amendment.


 


THIRD: That said amendment was duly adopted in
accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said Atlis Motor Vehicles
Inc. has caused this certificate to be signed by an authorized officer, this 1  day of October , 2019.


 


		BY:	/s/
                                            Mark Hanchett	- Signature
	 	 	 	 
	 	Name:	Mark
                                            Hanchett	-please print
	 	 	Authorized Officer
OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

- 

AUSTIN 

*rroa*n ou- 

. ‘- 

Honorable George H. Sheppard 

Goxptroller of Publio Accounts 

'Austin, Texas 

Dear Sir: 

appropriation for 

na nalntenanoe of 

epa,rtckeent for the 

oginnie.,Ssptember 

meterg .: :,~.: ,~ a. 
‘

, Ed .:.r : 

,. .‘., 

. . 

I-fOilbrable.Gaorge B.'Sheppard, Page $2. 

. 

- 

On August 'y/1943, at ~a regul!r term of the 98th 

District Court of Tarrant County, Texas, in Causa Noi 25570-A, 

Xount Olivat Ce.aetery C~n;sny~vs. State of T’exos, et al, 8 corn-~ 

promise judgment was entered between tho prrties decreeing that 

Tlaintiff, ?.5ount Gllvet kaatary Company, hava judgment against 

'the Defendan~ts, Tfu, Stu';E of ~Texas, and the Texas fii(@ay Codssion,.ln the amount of Yhlrty'Five Kundred ($3500.00) I)ollars; 

and further, thst Plaintiff have judgment ,against the Defendants 

for’ costs. 

In Opinion x0. o-32;Ci; .this Lepsrtmrt held thst the 

Lee@latura.has, the power to appropriate from tha Ststo Highway 

rUnd monags t0 pey'the jud&!Uent.render~d~ against tha~StatE of 

Taras on the case of II'. -Sd ?iaii\le,~ etux? vs. Tho:State of T6xas, 

et. al. The question'prtisonted, in this Opinisnis'whkthor or not 

'the LsgIslature haa upp~O;lriat,~d'~from:tho Sate XlIle,h::ay Funds 

monays to 'pay the. above gention& &Ngmnt, or in other words 

is.thiere o,n appropriation avails,blr :from vthioh saidjudgment 

can' beg .paid. -:-/ ; ., ,' : '.I.' .~. '~. 

,, ~) /:, ,, ,~ .,: ,,,,. 

,' ., .'In:conneotii~c'aithr$our'~~equest'we have ~'onrefullg 

-'oo&iidered ‘Sanate’.DiXX~~Ho.. 332,. Acts'of ths,:44th..Le~~Ylaturs 

'Rtigul~~:r~ Eession, ;:1943,’ (.C~pte.r.~.400;',Ep. 942-948) an8 fall to 

find 'any ~,available:a$propriatioq from uhioh :33ifJ ~judgumqt~ can 

ba'piaf; , ,,':,~~ ;',,, :;,.-,: "~ ,i: '..::;; .,y;;, ,,; '. ~' .".,, 

i,, 

',: 

.;Q ,,.. ,. 

,' It‘irr ‘6UP G&i.iOk'fhat the .jud@tIant Cannot be'yoici 

from tha' abroprfktion, for.ths.'support and aui?znterien& ~of the 

Highway .Department,~aaer~t,~~,itresgpt',A~proyriation.iiot. 

I.', .i ,, - 

.,, :: 1 

‘4 

-. ., (I .p 

lrrJ,
#### HARDY v. THORNTON.

(Filed 13 October, 1926.)

Reference — Findings—Appeal and Error.

Tbe findings of fact by tbe trial judge upon tbe report of a referee supported by competent evidence, are not reviewable on appeal.

Civil ACTION tried before *Nunn, J.,*and a -jury, at February Term, 1926, of GeeeNe. ■

Plaintiff, landlord, instituted a suit against tbe defendant, bis tenant, to recover balance due on a running account for tbe years 1919, 1920, and 1921. A claim and delivery was instituted at tbe beginning of tbe suit, and tbe 1921 crop of defendant seized thereunder. Tbe crop was afterwards sold. Tbe defendant denied tbe indebtedness, and further, that plaintiff bad any lien on tbe 1921 crop for tbe payment of advances for tbe preceding years. At tbe December Term, 1924, a compulsory reference was ordered and Hon. G. Y. Cooper appointed referee by Judge G. E. Midyette. Thereafter, tbe referee, after bearing tbe evidence and argument of counsel, filed a report which embodied findings of fact and conclusions of law as required by statute. Both sides filed exceptions to tbe referee’s report, and tbe cause came on for a regular bearing before Nunn, J., at tbe February Term, 1926, who beard tbe exceptions of tbe parties, and, after submitting certain issues to tbe jury, entered judgment that “tbe report of tbe referee, except as tbe same is modified by tbe aforesaid findings of tbe jury, and as further modified by this judgment, be, and tbe same is in all respects approved and confirmed.”

Tbe jury found in favor of tbe plaintiff, and from judgment on tbe verdict tbe defendant appealed.

*John G. Anderson, Sutton & Greene for plaintiff.*

*Shaw, J ones & J ones for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

Tbe court ordered a compulsory reference under C. S., 573, because tbe controversy involved tbe “examination of a long account on either side.” Tbe exceptions to tbe compulsory reference were withdrawn. It is established law in this State that a finding of fact by a Superior Court judge on exceptions to a referee’s report is not reviewable in tbe Supreme Court if there is evidence to support such finding by tbe trial judge. *Miller v. Groome,*109 N. C., 148; *Thompson v. Smith,*156 N. C., 345; *Dumas v. Morrison,*175 N. C., 431; *Caldwell v. Robinson,*179 N. C., 518.

*297In this case the findings of fact are all supported by evidence, and have been approved by the trial judge. Hence, such findings are not reviewable in this Court. *Dorsey v. Mining Co.,*177 N. C., 60.

The record is voluminous and many exceptions were taken to the evidence and the charge of the court. Each of the exceptions has been examined and considered, but the Court is of the opinion that the case was properly tried and in accordance with well-settled principles of law.

No error.