SOCIAL SECURITY

| MEMORANDUM |
|------------|
| Date:      | November 30, 2001 | Refer To:    | TCC |
| To:        | Stephen C. Goss, Chief Actuary |
| From:      | Alice H. Wade, Deputy Chief ActuaryChris Chaplain, Actuary |
| Subject:   | Estimates of Long-Range OASDI Financial Effect of the **Social Security Stabilization and Enhancement Act of 2001 (H.R. 3315)** -- **INFORMATION** |

This memorandum provides long-range estimates of the financial effect on the OASDI program assuming enactment of the **Social Security Stabilization and Enhancement Act of 2001 (H.R. 3315)**, as requested by Tom Vinson of Representative DeFazio's staff. All estimates are based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2001 Trustees Report, with additional assumptions noted below. The comprehensive proposal would:

Redefine the amount of earnings subject to the OASDI payroll tax,

Invest a portion of the OASI Trust Funds in marketable securities (including equities),

Modify the benefit computation period in determining OASDI benefit levels, and

Increase benefits for beneficiaries over the age of 85. 

Enactment of the comprehensive proposal described in this memorandum would improve the long-range OASDI actuarial balance by an estimated 1.89 percent of taxable payroll, changing the present-law actuarial deficit of 1.86 percent to an actuarial balance of +0.03 percent of taxable payroll. The OASDI annual balance for the year 2070 would improve by 2.00 percent of payroll, to an estimated level of -3.78 percent of payroll. The trust fund ratio for the combined OASDI program would increase to a peak of 626 percent in 2019, and then decline to a level of 164 percent at the end of the 75-year projection period. 

The remainder of this memorandum provides the following:

Description of the equity yield assumption used in estimating the yield on the portion of the OASI Trust Fund that is invested in equities,

Sensitivity analysis with regard to the equity yield assumption and/or the amount of equities held by the OASI Trust Fund,

Description of the provisions of this bill, and 

Brief listing of the individual provisions of the proposal, including the effect of each provision on the long-range OASDI actuarial balance (shown in table 1), and

Table 2 that gives annual estimates including income rates, cost rates, balances, trust fund ratios, and equities held in the OASI Trust Funds, expressed as a percent of GDP. 

Description of the equity yield assumption 

As indicated above, estimates provided in this memorandum are based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2001 Trustees Report. In addition, the long-term ultimate average annual real yield assumed for equities is assumed to be 6.5 percent. This is slightly lower than the expected real equity yield used for estimates produced by the Office of the Chief Actuary over the last several years. 

A consensus is forming among economists that equity pricing as indicated by price-to-earnings ratios may average somewhat higher in the long-term future than in the long-term past. This is consistent with broader access to equity markets and the belief that equities may be viewed as somewhat less "risky" in the future than in the past. Equity pricing will vary in the future as in the past. Price-to-earnings ratios were very high in the recent past, and are now lower.    The ultimate average real equity yield assumed for estimates in this memorandum is consistent with an average ultimate level of equity pricing somewhat above the average level of the past. The extent of this ultimate change is unknown, but it is consistent with assuming a real equity yield somewhat below the long-range past average of about 7 percent.

The assumption for an ultimate real equity yield of 7 percent that was used until this year was developed in 1995 with the 1994-6 Advisory Council. At the time, the Trustees assumption for the ultimate average real yield on long-term Treasury bonds was 2.3 percent. Real yields on corporate bonds are believed to bear a close relationship to Treasury bond yields of similar duration. The 2001 Trustees Report includes the assumption that the ultimate real yield on long-term Treasury bonds will average 3 percent, or 0.7 percentage point higher than in 1995. This increase in the assumed bond yield is consistent with a reduction in the perceived risk associated with equity investments.

Sensitivity analysis with regard to the equity yield assumption and/or the amount of equities held by the OASI Trust Fund

The **Social Security Stabilization and Enhancement Act of 2001** specifies that a portion of the OASI Trust Fund be invested in marketable securities starting October 1, 2001, reaching 40 percent in 2016 and later. An investment board would determine the allocation of these marketable securities. For the purpose of these estimates, we have assumed that the yield achieved on this portion of the trust fund assets would, on average, be consistent with maintaining 50 percent in domestic corporate equities and 50 percent in long-term U.S Treasury bonds. 

If less than 50 percent of the marketable securities were to be invested in equities or if actual real yields on equities were to average less than 6.5 percent, the long-range actuarial balance under this proposal would be less than indicated above. For example, if actual real yields on the marketable securities held in the OASI Trust Fund during the next 75 years were to average only 3 percent, the same level as assumed for long-term Treasury bonds, this comprehensive proposal would not provide for adequate financing for the OASDI program. However, the long-range actuarial deficit would still be reduced considerably. The long-range OASDI actuarial balance would improve by an estimated 1.52 percent of taxable payroll, reducing the present-law actuarial deficit of 1.86 percent to 0.34 percent of taxable payroll. 

It must be noted that the uncertainties associated with equity investments and bond yields mean that actual experience could vary substantially from the estimates provided in this memorandum.   In particular, there is a potential that real equity yields could average less than 3 percent over long periods of time, although this is not very likely.

Description of the provisions of this bill 

Provision 1: Eliminate the OASDI contribution and benefit base in determining the amount subjected to FICA and SECA payroll tax

For earnings in years after 2001, change the OASDI contribution and benefit base to be a benefit base only.   This means that there would be no limit on the amount of an individual's covered earnings that would be subject to OASDI payroll taxes, but the base would continue to be used to establish the maximum annual amount of earnings that is credited for the purpose of benefit computation.

Provision 2: Beginning in 2002, establish an exempt amount ($4,000 for 2002) that would serve to exclude up to that amount of covered earnings from Social Security employee payroll taxes. 

Beginning in 2002, establish an *exempt amount* that would serve to exclude up to that amount of covered earnings from the employee portion (1/2 of the self-employed portion) of the OASDI payroll taxes. The *exempt amount* would be set at $4,000 in 2002, and would be increased each year after 2002 by increases in the Social Security average wage index.   Earnings exempted due to this provision would still be included in determining OASDI benefit amounts.

Provision 3: Beginning in 2003, increase the benefits of beneficiaries who are age 85 or older. The maximum increase in benefits would be 5 percent.

For years after 2002, increase the level of benefits for all beneficiaries who age 85 or older. This amount of increase in an individual's present-law benefit level for a given *calendar year* would be determined by multiplying:

0.25 percent by

The number of calendar years, before the given 
calendar year
, in which the individual was age 85 or older.

The maximum amount of increase would be 5 percent.

For a *given calendar year*, benefit levels under present law would be increased by 0.25 percent for those who are age 85 as of the beginning of the *given calendar year*, by 0.50 percent for those who are age 86 as of the beginning of the *given calendar year*, ...., and by 5.00 percent who are age 104 as of the beginning of the *given calendar year*.

Provision 4: Change in calculation of AIME

*Provision 4a*: Increase the number of benefit computation years used in determining AIME:

Provision 4a would apply in determining benefits for retired workers and their dependents and for survivors of deceased workers. This provision does not apply in determining benefits for disabled workers and their dependents.

In calculating the AIME for a retired worker under present law, the highest 35 years of indexed earnings are generally used in determining the numerator of the AIME and a benefit computation period of 35 years is used in determining the denominator. Under this provision, the number of years of earnings used in calculating the numerator and denominator of the AIME, are both gradually increased, reaching 38 years for individuals who have no periods of disability and who become newly eligible for retired worker benefits after 2010.

The chart below indicates the phase in schedule of the above changes.

----

| Newly Eligible in Years:                                                                                                                                                                                                                     | 2007 - 2008                   | 2009 - 2010 | 2011+ |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|-------------|-------|
| **Present Law**                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         | Years in Numerator 1     | 35          | 35    | 35 |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         | Denominator (in years) 2 | 35          | 35    | 35 |
| **Proposal**                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         | Years in Numerator 1     | 36          | 37    | 38 |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         | Denominator (in years) 2 | 36          | 37    | 38 |
| 1 Years in Numerator: Refers to the number of years of earnings used in calculating the numerator of the AIME.2 Denominator (in years): Refers to the benefit computation period (in years) used in calculating the denominator of the AIME. |

----

Under current law, the number of benefit computation years for a retired worker of a deceased worker is determined by subtracting 5 *dropout* years from the number of *elapsed* years1. Under this proposed provision, the increase in the number of benefit computation years would be accomplished by reducing the number of *dropout* years, ultimately to two. 

*Provision 4b*: Credit up to 3 child-care dropout years in determining the number of years used in calculating the AIME for OASDI benefits.

Under this provision, credit up to 3 child-care dropout years, for workers who attain age 62, become disabled, or die after 2010. In the case of a disabled worker, this provision would increase the number of child-care dropout years under present law by up to 3 additional years. To credit a worker with a child-care dropout year, the following conditions must be met: 

The year must be included in the worker's computation base years,

The child was under age 12 throughout the year,

The worker is the parent or stepparent of the child, and

The worker had earnings below a certain threshold amount during the year. The threshold amount is set at $3,000 for calendar year 2007. The $3,000 level is indexed both backwards and forwards by the Social Security average wage index.

Dropout years are phased in by one additional year for new eligibles in each year 2007, 2009, and 2011. This phase in of the dropout years is consistent with the phase in of the increase in the number of years used in determining the AIME.

Provision 5: Invest a portion of the OASI Trust Fund in marketable securities beginning on or after Oct. 1, 2001, reaching 40 percent of assets for 2016 and later.

An Independent Social Security Investment Oversight Board shall establish in the OASI Trust Fund an investment fund comprised of:

A 
Government Securities Investment Fund
;

A 
Fixed Income Investment Fund
 which would be invested in insurance contracts, certificates of deposits, etc.;

A 
Common Stock Index Investment Fund
; and

Other investment funds
 as the Board may provide by regulation.

The portion of the OASI Trust Fund that would be held in this investment fund is targeted to be:

8 percent as of the end of 2004, 

16 percent as of the end of 2007, 

24 percent as of the end of 2010, 

32 percent as of the end of 2013, and 

40 percent as of the end of 2016 and for each year thereafter. 

For the purpose of these estimates, we have assumed that the yield achieved on this portion of the trust fund assets would, on average, be consistent with maintaining 50 percent in domestic corporate equities and 50 percent in long-term U.S Treasury bonds. 

|                |
|----------------|
| Alice H. Wade  |
|                |
| Chris Chaplain |

Attachments:

Table 1   Table 2

----

1*elapsed years**elapsed years*

----

NextList of memos