alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable) | Description of Proposed Provision:      Apply 4 percent payroll tax rate on earnings over $200,000 in 2017, with the $200,000 threshold wage-indexed after 2017.  Give no benefit credit for additional earnings in AIME for benefit computation. |
|-------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                           |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2009 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified May 14, 2010 |
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Level of Monthly Benefits (PIA) | Description of Proposed Provision:      Progressive indexing of PIA formula factors beginning with individuals newly eligible for OASI benefits in 2012 through 2061.  Create new bend point at the 30th percentile of earners. Maintain current-law benefits for earners at the 30th percentile and below and reduce upper 2 formula factors (32% and 15%) such that maximum worker benefit is reduced by 1.1 percent per year as compared to current law, for the years that progressive indexing applies.  Disability benefits are not affected by the proposal. Disabled worker beneficiaries, upon attaining normal retirement age, would be subject to a proportional reduction in benefits based on the worker's years of disability. |
|---------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2009 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified January 28, 2010 |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         202,994
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  265,588
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    484,794
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,688,820
<PP&E>                                      12,147,935
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,005,388
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,887,318
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,504,268
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           283
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,146,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,887,318
<SALES>                                      8,765,056
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,765,056
<CGS>                                        3,365,966
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,365,966
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,950,447
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             180,545
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (436,801)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (436,801)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (436,801)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.15)


</TABLE>
Order entered June 3 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 14
- 00566
- CV
JANE MCCURLEY BACKES D/B/A BACKES QUARTER HORSES, ET AL., Appellant s V. KAREN MISKO , ET AL. , Appellee s On Appeal from the 429th Judicial Distri ct Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 429
- 01844
- 2013 

### O RDER Before the Court is appellant Tracy Johns’s June 3, 2014 amended motion for an extension of time to file a brief. The motion recites that appellant Jane McCurley Backes d/b/a Backe s Quarter Horses joins the motion. We GRANT the amended motion. Appellants shall file their respective briefs on or before July 9, 2014 . We caution appellants that no further extension of time will be granted in this accelerated appeal absent extraordin ary circumstances.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-41294

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE CARLOS PINEDA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:08-CR-1237-ALL

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Carlos Pineda

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Pineda has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 20, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable) | Description of Proposed Provision:      Impose a 6 percent payroll tax on OASDI covered earnings above the current taxable maximum starting in 2010. Benefit computations would not reflect any earnings above the taxable maximum amount. |
|-------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                           |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2009 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified September 23, 2009 |
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Bernardo Ruiz

, * From the 29th District Cour t

of Palo Pinto County,

Trial Court No. C50204

Vs. No. 11

- 22

- 00 2 07

- C V * August 11, 2022

Adriana Ruiz * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinio n

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter , J. , and W illiams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes tha t the appeal

should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, in accordance with this

court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed. The costs incurred by reason of this

appeal are taxed against Bernardo Ruiz

.
## Detailed Single Year Tables

- Individual Provisions
- Level of Monthly Benefits

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						B5.2: Beginning for those newly eligible in 2024, reconfigure the special minimum benefit: (a) A year of coverage is defined as a year in which 4 quarters of coverage are earned. (b) At implementation, set the PIA for 30 years of coverage equal to 125 percent of the monthly poverty level (about $1,416 in 2022). For those with under 30 years of coverage, the PIA per year of coverage over 10 years is $1,416/20 = $70.80. (c) Index the initial PIA per year of coverage by wage growth for successive cohorts.**

### Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program

### Summarized Estimates
## Summary of Provisions That Would Change             the Social Security Program

- Office of the Chief Actuary
- Individual Provisions

### **Description of Proposed Provisions:              Provisions Affecting Trust Fund Investment in Equities**

Printer-friendly Version
EXHIBIT 21





As of September 1, 2005, SBS Technologies, Inc. has the following
subsidiaries:



|Name of Subsidiary                                          | State of Incorporation
|----------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------
|SBS Technologies, Inc., Government Group                    | New Mexico            
|SBS Technologies, Inc., Communications and Enterprise
Group | Minnesota             
|SBS Technologies, Inc. Foreign Holding Company              | Nevada                
|SBS Technologies, Inc., German Holdings, LLC                | Delaware              
|SBS Technologies, GmbH & Co. KG (1)                         | Germany               
|ortec Electronic Assembly GmbH (2)                          | Germany               
|SBS or Computers Verwaltungs GmbH (1)                       | Germany               
|SBS Technologies (Canada), Inc. (3)                         | Canada                
|SBS Technologies Finance LP (3)                             | Canada                
|SBS Technologies (Shenzhen) Limited (3)                     | China                 
|                                                            |                       

|(1) 	A subsidiary of SBS Technologies, Inc., German Holdings,
LLC 
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) 	A subsidiary of SBS Technologies, GmbH & Co.
KG              
|(3)	A subsidiary of SBS Technologies, Inc. Foreign Holding
Company
## Summary Measures and Graphs

- Individual Provisions
- Level of Monthly Benefits

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						B3.13: For retired worker beneficiaries newly eligible in 2030 (excluding disabled workers), add a new bend point at the wage-indexed equivalent of the 50th percentile of the AIME distribution minus $100 (for 2015 eligibility) and change the PIA factors to 95/32/15/5. Also move the current-law first bend point from the wage-indexed equivalent of $1,115 in 2023 to $1,417 in 2023. Phase this provision in over 10 years (2030-2039). The phase-in would work on a weighted-average basis: 90% of CL formula + 10% of proposal formula for 2030, 80% of CL formula + 20% of proposal formula for 2031, and so on.**

|  |  |
|--|--|
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Activant Solutions Inc. for the three and
six months ended March 31, 2008;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
    5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:
    By:
    /s/ PERVEZ QURESHIPervez QureshiPresident & Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 27 (Wednesday, February 10, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 7103]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02626]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL

[Docket No. AS16-01]


Appraisal Subcommittee Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions 
Examination Council.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Description: In accordance with Section 1104(b) of Title XI of the 
Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, 
as amended, notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee 
(ASC) will meet in open session for its regular meeting:
    Location: Federal Reserve Board--International Square location, 
1850 K Street NW., Washington, DC 20006.
    Date: February 16, 2016.
    Time: 10:00 a.m.
    Status: Open.

Reports

Chairman
Executive Director
Delegated State Compliance Reviews
Financial

Action and Discussion Items

November 4, 2015 Open Session Minutes
Appraisal Foundation Reprogramming Request
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on AMC Fees

How To Attend and Observe an ASC Meeting:

    If you plan to attend the ASC Meeting in person, we ask that you 
send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3c5159594855525b4f7c5d4f5f125b534a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c9a4acacbda0a7aeba89a8baaae7aea6bf">[email protected]</span></a>. You may register until close of 
business three business days before the meeting date. You will be 
contacted by the Federal Reserve Law Enforcement Unit on security 
requirements. You will also be asked to provide a valid government-
issued ID before being admitted to the Meeting. The meeting space is 
intended to accommodate public attendees. However, if the space will 
not accommodate all requests, the ASC may refuse attendance on that 
reasonable basis. The use of any video or audio tape recording device, 
photographing device, or any other electronic or mechanical device 
designed for similar purposes is prohibited at ASC meetings.

    Dated: February 4, 2016.
James R. Park,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2016-02626 Filed 2-9-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6700-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 27 (Thursday, February 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7760]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3199]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket Nos. GT95-14-000 and GT95-14-001]


Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.; Notice of Refund Report

February 3, 1995.
    Take notice that on December 28, 1994, Columbia Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Columbia), tendered for filing a refund report for the 
lump sum refunds in the amount of $385,035.98 made by Columbia on 
October 17, 1994, to disburse refunds received from Texas Eastern 
Transmission Corporation for Docket Nos. RP91-72, et al.
    On January 30, 1995, Columbia tendered for filing a supplemental 
refund report in Docket No. GT95-14-001. Columbia states that this 
filing is being tendered to report to the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, and to all parties in this docket, additional information 
about the refund.
    Columbia states that copies of the report are being mailed to 
interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, DC 
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules 
and Practice and Procedure. All such motions or protests should be 
filed on or before February 10, 1995. Protests will be considered by 
the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but 
will not serve to make the protestants parties to the proceedings. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. 
Copies of Columbia's filing are on file with the Commission and are 
available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-3199 Filed 2-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 10.3


 


REYNALDOS MEXICAN FOOD COMPANY, INC.


Unanimous Written Consent


Of Board of Directors


In Lieu of Special Meeting


 


The undersigned, being the Board of Directors of
Reynaldos Mexican Food Company, Inc. a Nevada Corporation (the “Corporation”), hereby waives the calling or holding of a meeting
of the Board of Directors of the Corporation (the “Board”), consents in writing as of this 14th day of December 2022 to the
following actions and directs that this unanimous written consent be filed by the Corporation’s Secretary with the minutes of proceedings
of the Board.


 


WHEREAS, the Corporation desires to accept the
resignation of Rhonda Keaveney as its President, CEO, Treasurer, Secretary and Director.


 


WHEREAS, the Corporation desires to appoint the
following:


 


Chi Ching Hung as its Chairwoman and
Director


Chi Wai Woo as its President, CEO, Treasurer,
CFO and Director


Timothy Chee-Yau Lam as its Secretary


 


Now therefore,


 


RESOLVED, the Corporation shall accept the resignation
of Rhonda Keaveney as its President, CEO, Treasurer, Secretary and Director, effective as of December 14, 2022.


 


FURTHER RESOLVED, the Corporation shall appointment
the following directors, effective as of December 14, 2022:


 


Chi Ching Hung as its Chairwoman and
Director


Chi Wai Woo as its President, CEO, Treasurer,
CFO and Director


Timothy Chee-Yau Lam as its Secretary


 


FURTHER RESOLVED, the Board of Directors of the
Corporation be and hereby is authorized, empowered and directed to take any and all actions and to execute, deliver and file any and
all agreements, instruments and documents as the Board of Directors so acting shall determine to be necessary or appropriate to consummate
the transactions contemplated by the foregoing resolution. The taking of such action shall be conclusive evidence that the same was deemed
to be necessary or appropriate and was authorized hereby.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned being the
Board of Directors of Reynaldos Mexican Food Company, Inc. have executed this Consent as of the day and year first written above.


 


 





Rhonda Keaveney, Director
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of SmartDisk Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael S. Battaglia, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/S/    MICHAEL S. BATTAGLIA


---

Michael S. Battaglia


President and Chief Executive
Officer





August 14, 2002
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3350 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to condition an institution 

of higher education’s receipt of Federal assistance on waiving the application for enrollment fee for homeless children and youths and students 

who were in foster care at any time when the students were 13 years 

of age or older. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 9, 2021 

Ms. ROSEN (for herself and Mr. PORTMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to condition 

an institution of higher education’s receipt of Federal 

assistance on waiving the application for enrollment fee 

for homeless children and youths and students who were 

in foster care at any time when the students were 13 

years of age or older. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Helping Foster and 

5 Homeless Youth Achieve Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3350 IS

1 SEC. 2. WAIVER OF APPLICATION FEES FOR HOMELESS 

2 CHILDREN AND YOUTHS AND FOSTER YOUTH. 

3 Part G of title IV of the Higher Education Act of 

4 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1088 et seq.) is amended by adding at 

5 the end the following: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 493E. WAIVER OF APPLICATION FEES FOR HOMELESS 

7 CHILDREN AND YOUTHS AND FOSTER YOUTH. 

8 ‘‘In order for an institution of higher education, or 

9 a student enrolled at the institution, to receive Federal 

10 assistance under this Act, the institution shall waive the 

11 application for enrollment fee for homeless children and 

12 youths (as defined in section 725 of the McKinney-Vento 

13 Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11434a)) and for a 

14 student who was in foster care at any time when the indi15 vidual was 13 years of age or older, as indicated on the 

16 Free Application for Federal Student Aid submitted by 

17 the student.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS