alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual Balance 

in 75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Ann

Balan

75th 

-1.92% -5.70% 1.00% 1.47% -0.93% -4.2

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2005 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actu

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Level of OASDI Contribution and Benefit Base

Proposed Provision: Make 90 percent of the earnings subject to the payroll tax (phased in 20retain the current-law taxable maximum for benefit purposes. This estimate considers all selfearnings in computing the percentage of earnings subject to the payroll tax.

January 4, 2006

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this prov

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

0.005.00

10.0015.0020.0025.00

2005 2015 2025 2035 2045 2055 2065 2075

Year

Percent

Cost rates with this provisionCost rates under present lawIncome rates with this provisionIncome rates under present law

OASDI tax rate schedule 

(employees and employers, each)

1993 and later 6.2%

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditu

0

100200300400500600700800900

1000

2005 2015 2025 2035 2045 205

Year

Percent

Present law with thi
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1284

RICHARD PEAMON, Plaintiff - Appellant, and BILL NORRIS; MICHAEL RICH, Plaintiffs, versus A AND R DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (1:06-cv-02974-WMN) Submitted: June 15, 2007 Decided: June 20, 2007 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard Peamon, Appellant Pro Se. Paul D. Shelton, MCKENNON, SHELTON & HENN, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; Paula Jeanette McGill, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Richard Peamon seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting the Defendant’s motion to set aside a default judgment and quashing service of process. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Peamon seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

April 28, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 128928 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 128928 

 COA: 252518 

Oakland CC: 2003-188269-FC,

ROBERT BABUR BASAT, 2003-188270-FC 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 10, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0424 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 28, 2006 

Clerk
<PAGE>   1





                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
                        SCIENTIFIC GAMES HOLDINGS CORP.
                       COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                      (IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 Three-month period                    Year
                                                  ended December 31             ended December 31
                                            -----------------------------  ----------------------------
                                                 1996       1995     1994      1996      1995      1994
                                            ---------  ---------  -------  --------  --------  --------
<S>                                           <C>        <C>      <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Net earnings                                  $ 5,513    $ 5,923  $ 3,434   $18,726   $22,428   $16,080
                                              =======    =======  =======   =======   =======   =======
Weighted Average Common stock outstanding      12,127     13,006   12,770    12,682    12,929    12,770
Effect of common stock equivalents (stock)        461        720      664       584       724       566
                                              -------    -------  -------  --------  --------  --------
Total                                         $12,588    $13,726   13,434   $13,266   $13,653    13,336
                                              =======    =======  =======  ========  ========  ========
Net earnings per common share                 $   .44    $   .43  $   .26   $  1.41   $  1.64   $  1.21
                                              =======    =======  =======  ========  ========  ========
</TABLE>


                                       23
## Detailed Single Year Tables

- Individual Provisions
- Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable)

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						E3.10: Beginning in 2031, apply 2 percent payroll tax rate on earnings over the wage-indexed equivalent of $300,000 in 2017 (about $522,300 in 2031), with the threshold wage-indexed after 2031. Provide proportional benefit credit for additional earnings taxed, based on the payroll tax rate applied to the additional earnings divided by the full 12.4 percent payroll tax rate.**

### Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program

### Summarized Estimates
Exhibit 23.3

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board of Directors

HSBC Technology & Services (USA) Inc.:

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-131714-04) on Form S-3 of HSBC Automotive Trust (USA) 2007 – 1 of our attestation report dated March 3, 2008 with respect to HSBC Technology & Services (USA) Inc.’s (the Company) assessment of compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for its servicing of asset backed securitization transactions backed by auto loan receivables, as of and for the period from January 31, 2007 (date of issuance of the initial asset-backed securitization transaction covered by this report) through December 31, 2007.  Management has determined that all other criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the Company’s activities with respect to HSBC Automotive Trust (USA) 2007 – 1.  Our attestationreport appears in the December 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K of HSBC Automotive Trust (USA) 2007 – 1.  

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

 

Chicago, Illinois

March 24, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 25 (Tuesday, February 7, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 7287]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3150]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


Nuclear Regulatory Commission

DATE: Weeks of February 6, 13, 20, and 27, 1995.

PLACE: Commissioner's Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland.

STATUS: Public and Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Week of February 6

    There are no meetings scheduled for the Week of February 6.

Week of February 13--Tentative

    There are no meetings scheduled for the Week of February 13.

Week of February 20--Tentative

    There are no meetings scheduled for the Week of February 20.

Week of February 27--Tentative

Tuesday, February 28

10:00 a.m.
    Briefing by OIG on Special Evaluation (Public Meeting)
    (Contact: Robert Shideler, 301-415-5972)
2:00 p.m.
    Discusssion of Management Issues (Closed--Ex. 2 and 6)

Wednesday, March 1

10:00 a.m.
    Briefing by Electricity Committee of NARUC (Public Meeting)
    (Contact: Spiros Droggitis, 301-504-2367)
11:30 a.m.
    Affirmation/Discussion and Vote (Public Meeting) (if needed)

    Note: Afirmation sessions are initially scheduled and announced 
to the public on a time-reserved basis. Supplementary notice is 
provided in accordance with the Sunshine Act as specific items are 
identified and added to the meeting agenda. If there is no specific 
subject listed for affirmation, this means that no item has as yet 
been identified as requiring any Commission vote on this date.

    The schedule for Commission meetings is subject to change on short 
notice. To verify the status of meetings call (Recording)--(301) 415-
1292.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Willian Hill (301) 415-1661.
    This notice is distributed by mail to several hundred subscribers; 
if you no longer wish to receive it, or would like to be added to it, 
please contact the Office of the Secretary, Attn: Operations Branch, 
Washington, D.C. 20555 (301-415-1963).
    In addition, distribution of this meeting notice over the internet 
system will also become available in the near future. If you are 
interested in receiving this Commission meeting schedule 
electronically, please send an electronic message to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4829242a08263a2b662f273e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d6b7bab496b8a4b5f8b1b9a0">[email protected]</span></a> or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0b6c607f4b657968256c647d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="84e3eff0c4eaf6e7aae3ebf2">[email protected]</span></a>.
* * * * *
    Dated: February 3, 1995.
William M. Hill, Jr.,
SECY Tracking Officer, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-3150 Filed 2-3-95; 2:39 pm]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M

</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATEOF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPursuant to Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18United States Code**

The undersigned, being the Principal Financial Officerof Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P. (the “Partnership”), hereby certifies thatthe Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2005, filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuantto Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that informationcontained in such Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to the Partnership and will be retainedby the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

Date: February 22,2006
| /s/ MARK  A. MAKI                                                |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Mark A. Maki  Vice President, Finance and Principal Financial Officer |   |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3453 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 233
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3453

To prohibit the payment of certain legal settlements to individuals who 
                 unlawfully entered the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 10, 2022

  Mr. Tillis (for himself, Mr. Cotton, and Mr. Cornyn) introduced the 
             following bill; which was read the first time

                            January 18, 2022

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the payment of certain legal settlements to individuals who 
                 unlawfully entered the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protect American Taxpayer Dollars 
from Illegal Immigration Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON LEGAL SETTLEMENTS FOR INDIVIDUALS WHO UNLAWFULLY 
              ENTERED THE UNITED STATES.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no 
Federal funds, including amounts deposited into the Judgment Fund 
established under section 1304 of title 31, United States Code, may be 
expended for any legal settlement to any individual who violated 
section 275(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1325(a)) if the claims giving rise to such settlement are based on the 
lawful detention of such individual as part of a family unit after 
entry at a port of entry or between ports of entry along the southern 
border of the United States after January 20, 2017.
    (b) Effective Date.--This section shall take effect on the date 
that is 1 day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                                       Calendar No. 233

117th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3453

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To prohibit the payment of certain legal settlements to individuals who 
                 unlawfully entered the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            January 18, 2022

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```
Exhibit 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the report on Form 10-Q of New South Bancshares, Inc. (the
Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Roger D. Murphree, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/    ROGER D.
MURPHREE                                                                
|Roger D. Murphree Acting Chief Financial Officer New South Bancshares, Inc. May 14, 2003



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to New South Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by New South Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1758

DENNIS W. DEBERRY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusUNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Postmaster General, Marvin T. Runyon, Jr., Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-777) Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 5, 1998 Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dennis W. Deberry, Appellant Pro Se. Gill Paul Beck, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Dennis W. Deberry appeals the district court’s order and judgment granting summary judgment to the Defendant and dismissing Deberry’s employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Deberry v. United States Postal Serv. , No. CA-97-777 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 20, 1998). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Randy S. Bayne, Chief Executive Officer, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of remote knowledge, inc. (the “Corporation”); 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The Corporation’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: 

 

a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Corporation, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reports is being prepared; 

 

b. evaluated the effectiveness of the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusion about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c. disclosed in this report any change in the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Corporation’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an quarterly report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting;and 

 

5. The Corporation’s other certifying office and Ihave disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Corporation’s auditors and the audit committee of Corporation’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Corporation’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Corporation’s auditors any materialweaknesses in internal controls; and 

 

b. any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Corporation’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 15, 2004
##### 



Exhibit 10.3
 PUT AGREEMENT
 
 RE:
    
    400,000 Shares of the $.001 Par Value Common Stock of Remote Knowledge, Inc.
Issued in Name of Holder




---



##### 



ALAN GRANADER/s/ Alan Granader
 STATE OF Michigan
    
    }} ss.COUNTY OF Oakland
    
    }
 9th
 /s/ Marilyn J. HoldenNotary PublicMy Commission Expires: January 29, 2008 DAN GRANADER/s/ Dan Granader
 STATE OF Montana
    
    }} ss.COUNTY OF Missoula
    
    }
 8
 /s/ Mark C. DvarishkisNotary PublicMy Commission Expires:8/1/08 HARRY GRANADER/s/ Harry Granader
 STATE OF Michigan
    
    }} ss.COUNTY OF Oakland
    
    }
 9th
 /s/ Marilyn J. HoldenNotary PublicMy Commission Expires: January 29, 2008
NO. 07-08-0020-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C 

APRIL 8, 2009

______________________________

PEACHTREE CONSTRUCTION, LTD. AND PEACHTREE 

CONSTRUCTION, INC., APPELLANTS

V.

MARION NEAL HEAD, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 17 DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY; TH

NO. 017-214779-05; HONORABLE FRED W. DAVIS, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

ON JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS

By opinion and judgment dated March 10, 2009, this Court affirmed the trial court’s

judgment awarding Appellee, Marion Neal Head damages of $191,970 with prejudgment

interest in his personal injury action against Appellants, Peachtree Construction, Ltd. and

Peachtree Construction, Inc. A motion for rehearing was due on March 25, 2009, but was
2

not filed. Instead, on March 30, 2009, the parties filed a Joint Motion to Dismiss indicating

they have agreed to compromise and settle the entire dispute between them. 

While our plenary power continues, we now withdraw our opinion and judgment of

March 10, 2009, and in lieu thereof, grant the joint motion to dismiss the appeal. Tex. R.

App. P. 42.1(a). Having dismissed the appeal at the request of all parties and the deadline

for filing a motion for rehearing having expired, our mandate will issue forthwith. No

agreement as to costs having been set forth in the motion, costs are taxed against

Peachtree Construction, Ltd. and Peachtree Construction, Inc. per Rule 42.1(d) of the

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. 

Patrick A. Pirtle

 Justice