alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1






CERTIFICATIONS




I, Mark N. Schwartz, certify that:




1.
I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Hypertension Diagnostics, Inc.;




2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4.
The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:




(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this report is being prepared;




(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.
The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.




/s/ Mark N. Schwartz


Mark N. Schwartz


Chief Executive Officer







Date:  November 6, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,455
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,846
<PP&E>                                         289,231
<DEPRECIATION>                                     106
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 449,666
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,030
<BONDS>                                        402,832
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,475
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   449,666
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,210
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,478
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,816)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,816)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,816)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Dean Witter Global Perspective Portfolio L.P. and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                       9,831,603
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   67,306<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,818,856<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,818,856<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,436,980<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,288,199
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                148,781
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            148,781
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   148,781
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include due from DWR of $23,246 and interest
receivable of $44,060.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net
unrealized gain on open contracts of $1,919,947.
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $123,597, accrued
management fees of $29,535 and accrued administrative expenses of $4,670.
<F4>Total revenues includes realized trading revenue of $(65,193), net
change in unrealized of $932,922 and interest income of $569,251.
</FN>



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 8648]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3710]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP95-155-000]


Viking Gas Transmission Co; Notice of Filing

February 9, 1995.
    Take notice that on February 6, 1995, Viking Gas Transmission 
Company (Viking), filed a report of interruptible throughput and 
revenues for the period November 1, 1993 through October 31, 1994. 
Viking also stated that Viking did not have sufficient net 
interruptible revenues during that period to trigger an obligation, 
under Article 5, Section 5 of Viking's Rate Schedule IT, to credit net 
interruptible revenues to Viking's firm shippers.
    Viking states that copies of the filing have been mailed to all of 
its jurisdictional customers and to affected state regulatory 
commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protect said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street N.E., Washington, D.C. 
20426, in accordance with Rule 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and procedure. All such motions or protests should be filed on 
or before February 16, 1995. Protests will be considered by the 
commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-3710 Filed 2-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE JESUS MERCADO RAMIREZ,

Petitioner,

v.

M ATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting

Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 14

- 72415

Agency No. A201

- 034

- 249

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 10, 2018 **

San Francisco, California

Before: WALLACE, RAWLINSON, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Jose Jesus Mercado Ramirez petitions for review of his removal proceedings

in the Board of Immigration Appeals ( Board ). We have juri sdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition.

Mercado argues that the Board erred by retroactively applying In re Leal

, 26

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

DEC 19 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2

I. & N. Dec. 20 , 27 (B

. I

. A

. 2012 ) ( Le al I ) to conclude that his Arizona conviction

for felony endangerment was a crime involving moral turpitude, that we should not

apply our decision in Leal v. Holder , 771 F.3d 1140, 1146 (9th Cir. 2014) ( Leal II )

to conclude that Arizona endangerment is a c rime involving moral turpitude for

similar reasons, and that the definition of “crime involving moral turpitude” is

unconstitutionally vague as applied to non

- fraudulent crimes. Mercado’s first and

third arguments our foreclosed by our decision in Olivas

- M ottas v. W hitaker

, __

F.3d __, No. 14

- 70543 (9th Cir. __, 2018). As to Mercado’s second argument, we

did not decide in Olivas

- Mottas whether Leal II changed the law and thus had a

retroactive effect. But we do not need to decide that issue in this case because

Leal I did not change the law, and Mercado has not argued to us that the Board

erred by applying Leal I for any reason other than retroactivity and vagueness.

PETITION DENIED.Mercado Ramirez v. Whitaker, No. 14

- 72415

WATFORD, Circuit Judge, dissenting:

For the reasons stated in my dissent in Olivas

- Motta v. W hitaker, __ F.3d __,

No. 14

- 70543 (9th Cir. 2018), I would grant Jose Jesus Mercado Ramirez’ s

petition for review and remand so that the Board of Immigration Appeals can

analyze the status of his conviction for reckless endangerment under the law as it

stood in 2001, when he pleaded guilty. 

# FILED

DEC 19 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Detailed Single Year Tables |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Level of Monthly Benefits (PIA) | Description of Proposed Provision:      Reduce benefits by 3 percent for those newly eligible for benefits in 2009 and later |
|---------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |

       Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program                Percentage of taxable payroll           Trust fundratio as ofJanuary 1CalendaryearCostrateIncomerateAnnualbalance 200811.2012.771.57 359200911.2612.811.55 369201011.3512.821.48 379201111.5012.841.34 388201211.7112.871.16 394201311.9512.900.95 398201412.2112.910.70 400201512.4812.930.45 400201612.7612.960.19 398201713.0512.98-0.08 395201813.3213.00-0.33 390201913.6013.01-0.59 384202013.8813.03-0.84 377202114.1413.05-1.09 369202214.3813.07-1.32 360202314.6313.08-1.55 350202414.8613.10-1.76 339202515.0813.11-1.97 327202615.2813.13-2.16 315202715.4813.14-2.34 301202815.6613.15-2.51 287202915.8313.16-2.67 272203015.9813.17-2.80 257203116.1013.18-2.92 241203216.2113.19-3.02 225203316.2813.20-3.09 209203416.3313.20-3.13 192203516.3713.20-3.16 175203616.3913.21-3.18 158203716.4013.21-3.19 141203816.3913.21-3.17 124203916.3613.21-3.15 107204016.3213.21-3.11 89204116.2813.21-3.07 72204216.2413.21-3.04 54204316.2013.21-3.00 36204416.1613.21-2.96 18204516.1313.21-2.92 1204616.1013.20-2.90 ----204716.0813.20-2.87 ----204816.0513.20-2.85 ----204916.0413.20-2.83 ----205016.0313.20-2.83 ----205116.0313.20-2.82 ----205216.0313.21-2.83 ----205316.0413.21-2.83 ----205416.0513.21-2.85 ----205516.0713.21-2.86 ----205616.0913.21-2.88 ----205716.1213.21-2.90 ----205816.1413.22-2.93 ----205916.1713.22-2.95 ----206016.1913.22-2.97 ----206116.2113.22-2.99 ----206216.2413.22-3.02 ----206316.2613.22-3.04 ----206416.2913.23-3.06 ----206516.3213.23-3.09 ----206616.3513.23-3.12 ----206716.3813.23-3.15 ----206816.4113.23-3.17 ----206916.4413.24-3.20 ----207016.4813.24-3.24 ----207116.5213.24-3.27 ----207216.5513.24-3.31 ----207316.5913.25-3.34 ----207416.6313.25-3.38 ----207516.6713.25-3.42 ----207616.7113.25-3.46 ----207716.7513.26-3.50 ----207816.7913.26-3.54 ----207916.8413.26-3.58 ----208016.8813.26-3.62 ----208116.9313.27-3.66 ----208216.9713.27-3.70 ----208317.0213.27-3.75 ----208417.0613.27-3.79 ----208517.1013.28-3.83 ----Summarized RatesYearsCostrateIncomerateActuarialbalance         Change inactuarialbalance Estimates based on the Intermediate Assumptions                         of the 2008 Trustees Report2008-208215.25%13.92%-1.34% 0.36% Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified August 11, 2008
1Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R.

47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 5, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________________

No. 04 - 30152

SUMMARY CALENDAR

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

WILBERT L. SHOEMAKER, also known as Chubby,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 03-CR-30015-ALL

_________________________________________________________________

Before JONES, SMITH and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

Wilbert L. Shoemaker (“Shoemaker”) appeals his guilty-plea

conviction and 20-year sentence for conspiracy to possess with

the intent to distribute more than 50 grams of cocaine base and

less than 50 kilograms of marijuana. Shoemaker contends that the

district court committed plain error by accepting his plea

without determining that it was supported by a factual basis, as

required by FED. R. CRIM. P. 11(b)(3). Shoemaker maintains that

the stipulated factual basis statement does not establish the
2

elements of the cocaine offense to which he pleaded guilty.

When, as in this case, a defendant does not object to Rule

11 errors in the district court, this court reviews for plain

error only. United States v. Vonn, 535 U.S. 55, 58-59 (2002). 

Under plain error review, the defendant bears the burden to show

that the district court committed a clear and obvious error that

affects his substantial rights. United States v. Marek, 238 F.3d

310, 315 (5th Cir. 2001)(en banc). The defendant also “must show

a reasonable probability, that but for the error, he would not

have entered the plea.” United States v. Dominguez Benitez, 124

S. Ct. 2333, 2340 (2004). This analysis is conducted by

examining the entire record. Id.

The record shows that the investigation surrounding the

offense at issue was initiated when law enforcement officers

received information that Shoemaker, a convicted cocaine

distributor, was selling cocaine base and marijuana. Based on

this information, law enforcement officers arranged two

controlled marijuana buys from Shoemaker. Following Shoemaker’s

arrest, a search of his residence revealed large quantities of

cocaine base and a set of digital scales. At his Rule 11

hearing, the district court explained the elements of the cocaine

offense to Shoemaker, who acknowledged his understanding of them

and subsequently pleaded guilty. In light of these facts,

Shoemaker has failed to establish that the district court
3

committed plain error by accepting his guilty plea.

Therefore, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
_______________________________________ __ 

### ___________________ ______________ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### March 9, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### 131632 (70) Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### JOSEPH LASH, Plaintiff-Appellee, SC: 131632

v COA: 263873 Grand Traverse CC: 04-024067-CL CITY OF TRAVERSE CITY, Defendant-Appellant.

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by defendant-appellant for leave to file reply brief instanter is considered and it is GRANTED.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 9, 2007

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       5,064,737             156,081,479
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,548,494              21,727,506
<ALLOWANCES>                                   125,000               4,300,169
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,912,513             185,916,614
<PP&E>                                     690,235,675           1,431,621,589
<DEPRECIATION>                              49,524,939             143,571,526
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             665,277,330           1,499,125,925
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       24,777,034              63,642,211
<BONDS>                                    442,094,869             819,308,375
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        32,026                  48,349
<OTHER-SE>                                 198,137,429             615,448,634
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               665,277,330           1,499,125,925
<SALES>                                     25,756,967              84,282,587
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            25,756,967              84,282,587
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,827,407              29,297,670
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            33,176,383              84,129,052
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           8,240,059              16,310,677
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (23,474,516)            (42,393,687)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (23,474,516)            (42,393,687)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (23,474,516)            (42,393,687)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.05)                  (0.89)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual Balance 

in 75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Ann

Balan

75th 

-1.92% -5.70% 0.52% 0.76% -1.40% -4.9

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2005 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actu

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Retirement Age

Proposed Provision: Eliminate the hiatus in the normal retirement age (speed up the increase and then index the normal retirement age (by 1 month every 2 years) until the NRA reaches a

January 4, 2006

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this prov

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

0.005.00

10.0015.0020.0025.00

2005 2015 2025 2035 2045 2055 2065 2075

Year

Percent

Cost rates with this provisionCost rates under present lawIncome rates with this provisionIncome rates under present law

OASDI tax rate schedule 

(employees and employers, each)

1993 and later 6.2%

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditu

0

100200300400500600700800900

1000

2005 2015 2025 2035 2045 205

Year

Percent

Present law with thi