alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 14-7139

NATHANIEL SINGLETON, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

FOOD SERVICE OFFICER MR. NELSON; FOOD SERVICE MR. TAYLOR; 

FOOD SERVICE MR. CRAZE; FOOD SERVICE MS. JOHNSON; FOOD 

SERVICE MS. VENTON; ADMINISTRATIVE FOOD SERVICE BROWN; 

ADMINISTRATIVE FOOD SERVICE ARGLINE, 

 Defendants - Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Aiken. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. 

(1:12-cv-02985-RBH) 

Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 22, 2014 

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Nathaniel Singleton, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

Dismissed by Supreme Court, June 29, 2015
2

PER CURIAM:

Nathaniel Singleton appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying 

relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown 

Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Singleton v. Nelson, No. 1:12-cv-02985-RBH (D.S.C. July 

24, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>   1
                  EXHIBIT 23 - CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Scientific Games Holdings Corp. of our report dated February 10, 2000
included in the 1999 Annual Report to Shareholders of Scientific Games Holdings
Corp.


We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements of Scientific Games Holdings Corp. listed below of our report dated
February 10, 2000 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Scientific Games Holdings Corp. incorporated by reference in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.

- Registration Statement No. 33-78322 on Form S-8 dated April 29, 1994 and
  related Prospectus.
- Registration Statement No. 33-78324 on Form S-8 dated April 29, 1994 and
  related Prospectus.
- Registration Statement No. 33-78326 on Form S-8 dated April 29, 1994 and
  related Prospectus.
- Registration Statement No. 33-78328 on Form S-8 dated April 29, 1994 and
  related Prospectus.
- Registration Statement No. 33-78330 on Form S-8 dated April 29, 1994 and
  related Prospectus.
- Registration Statement No. 33-90948 on Form S-8 dated April 5, 1995 and
  related Prospectus.
- Registration Statement No. 33-90950 on Form S-8 dated April 4, 1995 and
  related Prospectus.
- Registration Statement No. 333-3034 on Form S-8 dated April 1, 1996 and
  related Prospectus.
- Registration Statement No. 33-05847 on Form S-8 dated June 12, 1996 and
  related Prospectus.
- Registration Statement No. 333-30637 on Form S-8 dated July 2, 1997 and
  related Prospectus.
- Registration Statement No. 333-42833 on Form S-8 dated December 22, 1997 and
  related Prospectus.


                                       /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Atlanta, Georgia
March 29, 2000
## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS N O . A P - 76, 163
EX PA R TE D A V I D D EN M A R K BR O W N , A ppl i c ant
ON AP P LI CAT I ON F OR A W RI T OF HABE AS CORP US CAUS E N O. F 0 4 - 7 2 0 0 8 - M I N T HE 1 9 4 t h DI S TR I CT COURT

FROM DALLAS CO UNTY
P er cur i am . O P I N I O N Pur s u an t to th e p r o v is io n s o f A rti c le 1 1
. 0 7 o f th e T e xa s Co d e o f Cr im in a l Pr o c edure , the cler k of the trial court transmitt ed to this Court this application for writ of ha beas c orpus. Ex

pa rte Y oung , 4 18 S.W. 2d

82 4, 82 6 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 67 ). Ap pli c ant w a s c on vic te d o f de a dly c on du c t
and se nte nced to thirty -s e ve ny e ars ’ i mpr iso nme nt. Th e F if thCou rt of Ap pe a ls a ff

ir me d his conviction. Br own v . S

tat e , No. 05-05-009 0 2 -C R (Tex. App.–Dallas, deliver ed January 12, 2007, pet. re f’d)
. Applicant conte nds, int e r a lia , th a t his tr ia l c ouns e l re nd e re d ine ff e c tiv e a ssi sta

nc e be c a us e he failed to re quest a self -def ense instruc tion on the lesser include d char g e of de adly conduct
.2

Th e tr ia l c ourt , b a se d u

po n th e re c or d, has dete rm ine d th a t tr ia l c ouns e l w a s in e ff e c tiv e in that he failed to re quest a self -def ense instruct i o n on the cha rg e of de adly

conduct and that such ineffe ctive re prese ntation prejudice d applicant. We find, ther efor e, that applica nt is entitl ed to relief

. The judg ment of convic tion in C ase No. F04- 72008-M from the 194th J udicial District Court of Dallas County

is vacated and the a

pplicant is remande d to the Sheriff of Dallas County

to answer the c ha rg e s se t out in

the ind ic tme nt. Copies of this opinion s hall be sent to the Te xa s D e p a r tm e nt o f Crim in al J ustice–Corre ctional I nstitut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: J une 3, 2009 Do No t Pu

bli sh
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 29, 2020

No. 04-20-00017-CV

IN RE Mickey KOSER and Trinity Couriers, Inc.

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

On January 10, 2020, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of an 

order signed by the trial court on December 30, 2019. Relators also filed a motion requesting a 

stay of the January 21, 2020 trial setting. On January 14, 2020, this court issued an order 

denying the petition for writ of mandamus and denying as moot the motion for stay.2

 On 

January 16, 2020, the trial court signed an order amending its December 30, 2019 order. On 

January 21, 2020, relators filed a motion to dismiss this original proceeding stating this

proceeding is now moot based on the January 16, 2020 amended order. 

Because the trial court signed its amended order two days after this court denied the 

petition for writ of mandamus and because relators filed their motion to dismiss almost one week 

after this court denied the petition, we DENY AS MOOT relator’s motion to dismiss.

It is so ORDERED on January 29, 2020.

 

 PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

 Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2018CI05066, styled Stephanie Devora v. Mickey Koser and Trinity 

Couriers, Inc., pending in the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez

presiding.

2

 Our January 14, 2020 order stated this court’s opinion would issue at a later date.
Exhibit 15.1



LOGO



|                                                         |  |                                                                                                                                                                                    
|-------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm |  | Raymond Chabot Grant Thornton LLP Suite
2000 National Bank Tower 600 De La Gauchetière Street
West Montréal, Quebec H3B 4L8 
Telephone: 514-878-2691 Fax: 514-878-2127
www.rcgt.com

We have issued our reports dated March 9, 2016, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and internal
control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Intertape Polymer Group Inc. on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015.

We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Intertape Polymer Group Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-67732; File No. 333-97961; File No. 333-108077; File No. 333-114954; File
No. 3333-89763; File No. 333-114960; File No. 333-135599; and File No. 333-184797).



|                
|----------------
|LOGO            
|                
|Montreal, Canada
|March 31, 2016  



|1 | CPA auditor, CA, public accountancy permit No. A120795
|- | ------------------------------------------------------

Member of Grant Thornton International Ltd
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-1118

_____________________________

ERNEST MIESSEL GRUBB,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County.

David Rimmer, Judge.

March 5, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL and MAKAR, JJ., and BRASINGTON, MONICA J.,

ASSOCIATE JUDGE, concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and M.J. Lord, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Daniel Krumbholz, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
## Detailed Single Year Tables

- Individual Provisions
- Retirement Age

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						C2.6: Increase the normal retirement age (NRA) and the earliest eligibility age (EEA) for those age 62 in 2024-2025 to 68 and 63, respectively, and then by 3 months per year in 2026-2029 to 69 and 64, respectively.**

### Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program

### Summarized Estimates
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          11,253
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,210
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        576
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,953
<PP&E>                                          19,675
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,593
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  41,977
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,766
<BONDS>                                         80,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,581
<OTHER-SE>                                    (70,750)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    41,977
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                58,130
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   54,654
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,453
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,866)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (681)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,185)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,185)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 21.1
  1.
    
    American Superconductor Europe GmbH (*)  established in Germany2.
    
    American Superconductor Singapore PTE. Ltd. (*)  incorporated in Singapore3.
    
    AMSC Australia Pty Ltd (*)  incorporated in Australia4.
    
    AMSC Windtec GmbH (*)  incorporated in Austria5.
    
    AMSC United Kingdom Limited (*)  incorporated in the United Kingdom6.
    
    ASC Devens LLC (*)  formed in Delaware7.
    
    ASC Securities Corp. (*)  incorporated in Massachusetts8.
    
    NST Asset Holding Corporation (*)  incorporated in Delaware9.
    
    Superconductivity, Inc. (*)  incorporated in Delaware10.
    
    Suzhou AMSC Super Conductor Co., Ltd. (*)  incorporated in China11.
    
    American Superconductor Korea Co., Ltd. (*)   incorporated in South Korea12.
    
    American Superconductor Canada Limited (*)  incorporated in Canada
 
 *
    
    Wholly owned subsidiary of American Superconductor Corporation
#### MRS. JANE TABOR v. LABORERS BUILDING AND LOAN ASSOCIATION.

(Filed 29 June, 1932.)

Appeal by defendant from *Sink, J.,*at November Term, 1931, of HendeesoN.

No error.

This is an action by an aged widow who could not read or write, to recover of defendant $4,000 and interest from 1 July, 1930.

The following judgment was rendered on the verdict in the court below: “This cause coming on to be heard before his Honor, Judge H. Hoyle Sink, judge presiding, and a jury at the November Term, 1931, of the Superior Court of Henderson County, the following issues were submitted to the jury and answered as therein set out, to wit: (1) "Was A. O. Jones, cashier of the First Bank and Trust Company at East Elat Rock, authorized by the defendant to solicit applications for stock in its association, and collect dues and act as its duly authorized agent as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. (2) Did the plaintiff, Jane Tabor, authorize or instruct A. O. Jones to convert her Building and Loan stock and buy for her a certificate of deposit in the First Bank and Trust Company? Answer: No. (3) In what amount, if anything, is the plaintiff entitled to recover ? Answer: $4,000, with interest from 20 February, 1930, at 5 per cent, less any interest payments made since that time. It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff, Jane Tabor, have and recover of the defendant, Laborers Building and Loan Association the sum of four thousand dollars ($4,000) with interest thereon at 5 per cent from 20 February, 1930, less any interest payments in the sum of $150.00 made to plaintiff, Jane Tabor, since 20 February, 1930, until paid, together with the costs of this action to be taxed by the clerk. It is further ordered and adjudged that execution issue for the satisfaction of said debt, interest and costs.”

*Embank, Whitviire & Weeks and J. Bobt. Martin for plaintiff.*

*Cr. H. Valentine and, Shipman & Arledge for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

From a careful reading of the record and the able briefs of the litigants, we can see no prejudicial or reversible error in the trial of this action in the court below. ¥e think the evidence was of sufficient probative force to have been submitted to the jury, to support the issues which were submitted and the issues were material and determinative of the controversy. We see no error in law in the trial in the court below. The matter was one of fact for the jury to decide. In the judgment we find

No error.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

,

Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder

,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 1 , 2017 

# Order

Clerk September 1 , 2017

153081(1 1 8 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

SC: 153081

v COA: 325741

Genesee CC: 13

- 032654

- FC

KENYA ALI HYATT,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion s of the State Appellate Defender Office

to file a brief amicus curiae and for leave to file the brief late is GRANTED. The amicus

brief submitted on August 31 , 2017 , is accepted for filing

.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3434 

To commission a study relating to the manufacturing programs of the 

Department of Commerce, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 17, 2021 

Mr. PETERS (for himself and Mrs. BLACKBURN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To commission a study relating to the manufacturing programs of the Department of Commerce, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Strengthening Support 

5 for American Manufacturing Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STUDY ON THE MANUFACTURING PROGRAMS OF 

7 THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE. 

8 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3434 IS

1 (1) ACADEMY.—The term ‘‘Academy’’ means 

2 the National Academy of Public Administration. 

3 (2) COMMERCE MANUFACTURING PROGRAMS.— 

4 The term ‘‘commerce manufacturing programs’’ 

5 mean the manufacturing programs of the Depart6 ment of Commerce. 

7 (b) STUDY.—The Secretary of Commerce shall enter 

8 into a contract with the Academy to conduct a study— 

9 (1) on the commerce manufacturing programs, 

10 the statutory foundations of the commerce manufac11 turing programs, and the merits and limitations of 

12 the commerce manufacturing programs; 

13 (2) that considers and evaluates options to opti14 mize the management of the commerce manufac15 turing programs, including options to consolidate the 

16 administration of the commerce manufacturing pro17 grams by creating an agency responsible for that ad18 ministration; and 

19 (3) suggests a structure for legislation that 

20 would implement the options described in paragraph 

21 (2). 

22 (c) CONTENTS.—The study conducted under sub23 section (b) shall include— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3434 IS

1 (1) a comprehensive collection of the statutory 

2 authorities for the commerce manufacturing pro3 grams; 

4 (2) an assessment of available Federal pro5 posals to consolidate the commerce manufacturing 

6 programs; and 

7 (3) a consideration of the administrative and 

8 organizational relationships— 

9 (A) between the heads of the commerce 

10 manufacturing programs; 

11 (B) within the Department of Commerce; 

12 and 

13 (C) between the Department of Commerce 

14 and States. 

15 (d) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 1 year 

16 after the date on which the Academy enters into a contract 

17 to conduct a study under subsection (b), the Academy 

18 shall submit a summary of the findings and recommenda19 tions of the study to— 

20 (1) the Committee on Appropriations and the 

21 Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transpor22 tation of the Senate; and 

23 (2) the Committee on Appropriations, the Com24 mittee on Natural Resources, and the Committee on 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
4 

•S 3434 IS

1 Energy and Commerce of the House of Representa2 tives. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3613 

To prohibit the housing of chimpanzees at installations of the Department 

of the Air Force. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2022 

Mr. KENNEDY (for himself, Ms. DUCKWORTH, Mr. CASSIDY, and Mr. HEINRICH) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To prohibit the housing of chimpanzees at installations of 

the Department of the Air Force. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Chimp Sanctuary 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON HOUSING OF CHIMPANZEES AT 

7 INSTALLATIONS OF THE AIR FORCE. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—On or after the date that is 180 

9 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the SecVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:58 Feb 11, 2022 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3613.IS S3613

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3613 IS

1 retary of the Air Force may not house chimpanzees at any 

2 installation of the Department of the Air Force. 

3 (b) TRANSPORT OF CHIMPANZEES.— 

4 (1) IN GENERAL.—Any chimpanzees currently 

5 housed at an installation of the Department of the 

6 Air Force shall be transported to Chimp Haven in 

7 Louisiana, beginning not later than the date of the 

8 enactment of this Act. 

9 (2) COMPLETION OF TRANSPORT.—All trans10 port of chimpanzees required under paragraph (1) 

11 shall be completed by not later than the date that 

12 is 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 

13 Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
### Proposed Provision: B7.5. Increase benefits by 5 percent for all beneficiaries as of the beginning of 2024 and for those newly eligible for benefits after the beginning of 2024.

back
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 28 (Friday, February 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8100-8101]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3336]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE


Notice of Meeting of the Advisory Committee on Trade Policy and 
Negotiations

AGENCY: Office of the United States Trade Representative.

ACTION: Notice that the February 9, 1995 meeting of the Advisory 
Committee on Trade Policy and Negotiation will be held from 10:00 a.m. 
to 2:00 p.m. The meeting will be closed to the public from 10:00 a.m. 
to :15 p.m. The meeting will be open to the public from 1:15 p.m. to 
2:00 p.m.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Advisory Committee on Trade Policy and Negotiation will 
hold a meeting on December 6, 1994 from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. The 
meeting will be closed to the public from 10:00 a.m. to 1:15 p.m. The 
meeting will include a review and discussion of current issues which 
influence U.S. trade policy. Pursuant to Section 2155(f)(2) of Title 19 
of the United States Code, I have determined that this portion of the 
meeting will be concerned with matters [[Page 8101]] the disclosure of 
which would seriously compromise the development by the United States 
Government of trade policy, priorities, negotiating objectives or 
bargaining positions with respect to the operation of any trade 
agreement and other matters arising in connection with the development, 
implementation and administration of the trade policy of the United 
States. The meeting will be open to the public and press from 1:15 p.m. 
to 2:00 p.m. when trade policy issues will be discussed. Attendance 
during this part of the meeting is for observation only. Individuals 
who are not members of the committee will not be invited to comment.

DATES: The meeting is scheduled for February 9, 1995, unless otherwise 
notified.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Sheraton-Carlton Hotel, 
located at 16th and K streets, NW., Washington, DC, unless otherwise 
notified.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michaelle Burstin, Director of Public Liaison, Office of the United 
States Trade Representative, (202) 395-6120.
Michael Kantor,
United States Trade Representative.
[FR Doc. 95-3336 Filed 2-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3190-01-M