alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Dean
Witter Global Perspective Portfolio L.P. and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial instruments.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      19,685,194
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  278,351<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,221,634<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,221,634<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,917,569<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,497,366
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,420,203
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,420,203
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,420,203
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include due from DWR of $204,727 and interest receivable
of $73,624.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net unrealized
gain on open contracts of $1,204,698 and net option premiums of $53,391.
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $199,785, accrued borkerage
commissions of $0, accrued management fees of $53,054, accrued
administrative expenses of $0 and accrued transaction fees and costs
of $0.
<F4>Total revenue includes realized trading revenue of $3,890,363, net
change in unrealized of $128,325 and interest income of $898,881.
</FN>


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.04

                                FIRST AMENDMENT
                                       TO
            COOPERATIVE COMPUTING HOLDING COMPANY, INC. AMENDED AND
               RESTATED 2000 STOCK OPTION PLAN FOR KEY EMPLOYEES

This First Amendment to the Cooperative Computing Holding Company, Inc. Amended
and Restated 2000 Stock Option Plan for Key Employees (this "Amendment"), dated
as of October 23, 2003, amends the Cooperative Computing Holding Company, Inc.
Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Option Plan for Key Employees, effective as of
February 1, 2000 (the "Plan").

WHEREAS, the Company has previously established the Plan, whereby Key Employees
and Eligible Non-Employees, as those terms are defined in the Plan, were
afforded the possibility to receive options (the "Options") to purchase shares
of the common stock, $0.01 par value per share, of the Company;

WHEREAS, the Company subsequently amended its certificate of incorporation to
change its name to Activant Solutions Holdings Inc.; and

WHEREAS, the Company desires, pursuant to section 21 of the Plan, to amend the
Plan to reflect such name change.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows:

6. Amendment. All references to Cooperative Computing Holding Company, Inc. and
the Company in the Plan are hereby amended to refer to Activant Solutions
Holdings Inc., and the name of the Plan shall hereinafter be referred to as the
Activant Solutions Holdings Inc. Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Option Plan for
Key Employees.

7. Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed and enforced
in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware.

8. Headings. The headings contained herein are for convenience of reference only
and shall not control or affect the meaning or construction of any provision
hereof.

9. Inconsistencies. In the case of any inconsistencies between this Amendment
and the Plan, the terms of this Amendment shall govern.

10. Effect of Amendment. Except as amended hereby, the terms and provisions of
the Plan shall remain in full force and effect and are hereby in all respects
ratified and confirmed by the parties hereto. Any Options previously granted
pursuant to option agreements under the Plan shall remain in full force and
effect.

            [The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.]

<PAGE>
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has duly executed and delivered by the
undersigned, effective as of the day and year first written above.


                                        ACTIVANT SOLUTIONS HOLDINGS INC.


                                        By: /s/ RICHARD W. REW II
                                            -----------------------------------
                                        Name: Richard W. Rew II
                                              ---------------------------------
                                        Title: General Counsel & Secretary
                                               --------------------------------
Order filed December 4, 2012. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-00979-CV

____________

RANDALL L. PATTERSON, Appellant

V.

CITY OF HOUSTON, Appellee

On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2011-27190

O R D E R

According to information provided to this court, appellant mailed a notice of 

appeal on October 19, 2012, to the Harris County District Clerk to appeal a judgment 

signed on or about September 21, 2012. Appellant has not paid the appellate filing fee in 

the amount of $175.00. The clerk’s record in this appeal was due November 20, 2012, but 

it has not been filed because appellant has not made payment arrangements for its 

preparation. 
2

On November 13, 2012, appellant notified this court that, “This Application for 

Writ of Habeas Corpus under appeal has been filed under Texas Code of Criminal 

Procedure Section 11.01. This is a no fee case under Texas Code of Criminal Procedure 

Art. 11.051.” We have been advised that appellant provided a similar notice to the Harris 

County District Clerk. 

An appeal from a ruling on an application for a writ of habeas corpus is generally 

a criminal matter governed by the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. This case was filed 

in a civil district court, however, and the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure generally 

does not apply to civil cases. While a party may file an application for a writ of habeas 

corpus in a civil case to seek relief from confinement for contempt of court, the Texas 

Supreme Court has determined that an order granting or denying habeas relief in a civil 

case is not appealable. See Gray v. Rankin ̧ 594 S.W.2d 409 (Tex. 1980); see also

Filsinger v. Filsinger, 225 S.W.3d 29 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2005, no pet.) (holding that 

an order granting a writ of habeas corpus is not an appealable order). It therefore appears 

that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal.

In order that we may determine our jurisdiction over this appeal, pursuant to Tex. 

R. App. P. 35.3(c), we issue the following order: 

The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a partial clerk’s record on or 

before December 28, 2012, containing the following:

(1) the pleadings; see Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(a)(1);

(2) the court’s judgment or order being appealed, see Tex. R. App. P. 

34.5(a)(5); and 

(3) the notice of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(a)(7).

PER CURIAM
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3424 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3424

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow early childhood 
    educators to take the educator expense deduction, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 16, 2021

Mr. Bennet (for himself and Ms. Collins) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow early childhood 
    educators to take the educator expense deduction, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Supporting Early-childhood 
Educators' Deductions Act'' or the ``SEED Act''.

SEC. 2. EDUCATOR EXPENSE DEDUCTION TO INCLUDE EARLY CHILDHOOD 
              EDUCATORS.

    (a) In General.--Section 62 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(2)(D), by striking ``elementary and 
        secondary'' in the heading and inserting ``early childhood, 
        elementary, and secondary'';
            (2) in subsection (d)(1)(A), by striking ``kindergarten 
        through grade 12 teacher'' and inserting, ``early childhood or 
        kindergarten through grade 12 teacher, educator''; and
            (3) in subsection (d)(1)(B), by striking ``elementary 
        education or secondary education'' and inserting ``early 
        childhood education (through pre-kindergarten) or elementary or 
        secondary education''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to expenses incurred in taxable years beginning after December 
31, 2020.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

R. Jack DeCrane, as ChiefExecutive Officer of DeCrane Aircraft Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation(the “Company”), hereby certifies that:

 

(1)                                  TheCompany’s periodic report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002(the “Form 10-K”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| April 15, 2003 | By:    | /s/  R. Jack DeCrane |
|----------------|--------|---------------------------|
|           | Name:  | R. Jack DeCrane           |
|           | Title: | Chief Executive Officer   |

 

 

**A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to DeCrane Aircraft Holdings, Inc. and will beretained by DeCrane Aircraft Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.**

 

**This certification is being submitted to the Securities andExchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.  This certification shall not to be deemed “filed” for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “ExchangeAct”), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.  This certification does not constitute apart of Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K accompanying this certificationand to which it is an exhibit.**

 

----
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-30027 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ARSENIO MARIN PINEDA, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CV-2681-A
- - - - - - - - - - August 12, 1996 Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Arsenio Marin Pineda has appealed from the denial of his motion to vacate, 28 U.S.C. § 2255. There is no merit to his contention of double jeopardy based on forfeiture of property to the Government. See United States v. Ursery , ___ U.S. ___ (June 24, 1996), 1996 WL 340815. AFFIRMED.
Order entered August 14, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01430-CR

No. 05-12-01603-CR

NAKIA LASHUAN FRANKLIN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 416-81048-2008, 416-81072-2012

ORDER

On July 5, 2013, this Court struck the Anders brief filed by counsel. We further ordered 

court reporter Susan Maienschein, as official court reporter of the 416th Judicial District Court, 

to file, within thirty days, either: the reporter’s record of the June 19, 2008 guilty plea hearing 

and any hearings on the modifications of appellant’s community supervision; or (2) written 

verification that the June 19, 2008 hearing and/or any modification hearings were not recorded. 

To date, Ms. Maienschein has filed neither the reporter’s record nor written verification that the 

hearings were not recorded. The appeals cannot proceed until the issue of the reporter’s record is 

resolved.

Accordingly, we ORDER the trial court to make findings regarding the following:
 Whether the June 19, 2008 hearing and any modification hearings were recorded. If the 

hearings were not recorded, the trial court shall make a finding to that effect.

 If the hearings were recorded, the name and contact information of the court reporter(s) 

who recorded the hearings.

 Whether the notes of the hearings are available and can be transcribed and, if so, the date 

by which the record will be filed.

 If the notes are not available or cannot be transcribed, whether appellant is at fault for the 

loss or destruction of the notes and whether the parties can agree on a substituted record.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record containing the written findings of fact, any 

supporting documentation, and any orders to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of 

this order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the 

Honorable Chris Oldner, Presiding Judge, 416th Judicial District Court, and to counsel for all 

parties.

We ABATE the appeal to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal 

shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
## Detailed Single Year Tables

- Individual Provisions
- Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable)

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						E3.19: Increase the taxable maximum such that 90 percent of earnings would be subject to the payroll tax (phased in linearly from 2025-2030). Provide benefit credit for additional earnings taxed, using a secondary PIA formula. This secondary PIA formula involves: (1) an "AIME+" derived from additional annual earnings taxed over the current-law taxable maximum; and (2) a formula factor of 2.5 percent on this newly computed "AIME+".**

### Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program

### Summarized Estimates
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001059267
<NAME>                        Capita Research Group Inc
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         9229
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  12027
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               21256
<PP&E>                                         183499
<DEPRECIATION>                                 86211
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 126179
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          253516
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       12174
<OTHER-SE>                                     (139511)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        38000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               38000
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               807570
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2692
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (772262)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (772262)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (772262)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.08)
        


</TABLE>
### Proposed Provision: E2.2. Eliminate the taxable maximum in years 2024 and later, and apply full 12.4 percent payroll tax rate to all earnings. Provide benefit credit for earnings above the current-law taxable maximum.

back
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's Balance Sheet as of December 31, 1996 and Statements of Operations for
the year ended December 31, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         2,301
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  10,214 
<ALLOWANCES>                                   473    
<INVENTORY>                                    354    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               13,644 
<PP&E>                                         111,226
<DEPRECIATION>                                 17,534 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 144,986
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          12,425 
<BONDS>                                        65,445 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       89     
<OTHER-SE>                                     58,008 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   144,986
<SALES>                                        0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               56,804 
<CGS>                                          51,038 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             5,485  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                460
<INCOME-TAX>                                   245
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            215    
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                476    
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (261)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 335 

To reauthorize the Tropical Forest and Coral Reef Conservation Act of 

1998. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 22, 2021 

Mr. PORTMAN (for himself, Mr. COONS, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. SCHATZ, and 

Mr. BURR) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Tropical Forest and Coral Reef 

Conservation Act of 1998. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tropical Forest and 

5 Coral Reef Conservation Reauthorization Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION. 

7 Section 806(d) of the Tropical Forest and Coral Reef 

8 Conservation Act of 1998 (22 U.S.C. 2431d(d)) is amend9 ed by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: 

10 ‘‘(9) $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2022. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 335 IS

1 ‘‘(10) $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2023. 

2 ‘‘(11) $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2024. 

3 ‘‘(12) $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2025. 

4 ‘‘(13) $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2026.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### STATE v. FARLEY LOWE.

(Filed 26 April, 1933.)

Receiving Stolen Goods D b—

Recent possession of stolen property, without more, is insufficient to raise a presumption of guilt of the statutory charge of receiving saicl property knowing it to have been stolen. C. S., 4250.

Appeal by defendant from *Clement, J.,*at February Special Term, 1933, of Guilford.

Criminal prosecution tried upon an indictment charging the defendant (1) with the larceny of an automobile, valued at $500, the property of one Boyd C. Royalls, and (2) with receiving said automobile, valued at $500, the property of the said Boyd C. Royalls, knowing it to have been feloniously stolen or taken in violation of C. S., 4250.

The evidence tends to show that on the night of 14 July, 1930, the prosecuting witness’ automobile was stolen in High Point. Eight days thereafter it was found in Chesterfield, S. O. The defendant had been arrested as the suspected thief and lodged in jail. The defendant told *573tlie prosecuting witness that Bill Payne came by his home with the car and brought him to South Carolina with the promise that he would get some money and pay him what he owed him.

Verdict: Guilty of receiving.

Judgment: Two years on the roads.

Defendant appeals, assigning errors.

*Attorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Seawell for the State.*

*George A. Younce, Adam Younce and John B. Hughes for defendant.*

Stacy, C. J.

Conceding that the recent possession .of the stolen automobile (if, indeed, the evidence establishes such possession, which may be doubted) was a circumstance tending to show the larceny thereof by the defendant *(S. v. Best,*202 N. C., 9, 161 S. E., 535), still it is the holding with us that the inference or presumption arising from the recent possession of stolen property, without more, does not extend to the statutory charge (C. S., 4250) of receiving said property knowing it to have been feloniously stolen or taken. *S. v. Adams,*133 N. C., 667, 45 S. E., 553.

There was not sufficient evidence to justify a conviction on the second count in the bill.

Eeversed.