alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Detailed Single Year Tables

- Individual Provisions
- Trust Fund Investment in Equities

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						G3: Invest 40 percent of the OASI and DI Trust Fund reserves in equities (phased in 2024-2038), assuming an ultimate 2.3 percent annual real rate of return on equities. Thus, the ultimate rate of return on equities is the same as that assumed for Trust Fund bonds.**

### Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 75th 

Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

-2.00% -4.34% 0.41% 1.23% -1.59% -3.11%

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Retirement Age

Proposed Provision: Increase the normal retirement age (NRA) from 66 to 67 one year earlier than 

current law, starting for those reaching age 62 in 2016 and ending for those reaching age 62 in 2021. 

Then, after 2021, index the NRA to maintain a constant ratio of expected retirement years (life 

expectancy at NRA) to potential work years (NRA minus 20).

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this provision

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Cost rates with this provision

Income rates under present law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under present law

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Present law With this provision

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2009 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary, Social Security

November 16, 2009

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Cost rates with this provision

Income rates under present law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under present law

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Present law With this provision
### Proposed Provision: F4. Expand covered earnings to include contributions to voluntary salary reduction plans (such as Cafeteria 125 plans and Flexible Spending Accounts). Starting in 2024, subject these contributions to the OASDI payroll tax, making the payroll tax treatment of these contributions like 401(k) contributions.

back
EXHIBIT  99.2

                             INSIDERSTREET.COM, INC.
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Insiderstreet.com, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending January 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Norman J. Birmingham, the Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ NORMAN J. BIRMINGHAM
----------------------------------------
Norman J. Birmingham
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
March 19, 2003



The foregoing certifications are made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for
any other purpose.
#### STATE v. CHARLIE BEASLEY.

(Filed 9 October, 1946.)

Criminal Law § 17 c—

Defendant’s plea of *nolo contendere*establishes his guilt for the purpose of punishment, and the fact that the evidence offered by the solicitor *at*the request of the court to inform the court of the nature of the offense and to enable the court to fix punishment, is insufficient to establish any crime, does not entitle defendant to his discharge, the guilt of accused not being at issue.

Appeal by defendant-from *Grady, Emergency Judge,*at February Term, 1946, of JoiiNSTON.

Criminal prosecution on indictments charging the defendant with the unlawful possession and use of “punch board or gambling device,” and with resisting an officer.

The solicitor took a *"nol fros.”*on the charge of resisting an officer, and the defendant, through counsel, entered a plea of *nolo contendere*to the remaining counts. The court thereupon requested the solicitor to offer some evidence in order that the court might know the nature of the offense, and fix the punishment.

From the judgment pronounced, the defendant appeals.

*Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorneys-General Bruton, Rhodes, and Moody for the State.*

*Levinson, Pool & Batton, Paul D. Grady, Jr., and R. M. Gantt for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

The defendant seeks to contend that the evidence offered, after plea, to acquaint the court with the nature of the offense fails to establish any crime, and therefore he ought to be discharged. The position is untenable. The guilt of the accused was not at issue, and the solicitor was not undertaking to make out a case. The defend*581ant’s plea relieved the prosecution of this burden. *S. v. Burnett,*174 N. C., 796, 93 S. E., 473.

Similar questions are being resolved against tbe defendants in *S. v. Beasley, ante,*577, and *S. v. Ayers, ante,*579, herewith decided. Hence, the subject judgment will be affirmed on authority of these cases.

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with the AnnualReport on Form 10-K of HF Financial Corp. (the “Company”) for the fiscal yearended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Darrel L. Posegate, Executive VicePresident, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Darrel L. Posegate                         |                           |
|--------|------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|
|   | Darrel L. Posegate,  Executive Vice President, |                           |
|   | Chief Financial Officer and  Treasurer         |                           |
|   |                                           |                           |
|   | Date:                                          |   September 27, 2006 |   |
|        |                                                |                                |  |

 

 

*                                         A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toHF Financial Corp. and will be retained by HF Financial Corp. and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Fintech’s right to exercise its Purchase Option will commence on the date the RestructuringAgreement is executed and will remain in effect for three years following that date, subject to theautomatic termination of the Vitro Option Agreement under certain conditions. Vitro’s RepurchaseOption may be exercised during the three years following Fintech’s exercise of its Purchase Option,subject to certain limitations. If (i) the Restructuring Agreement has not been executed byDecember 15, 2019, (ii) the relevant real estate assets are no longer part of the Asset Trust or(iii) the Trust Agreement has been terminated, the Vitro Option Agreement will be automaticallyterminated.In the event that (i) all conditions precedent are satisfied, (ii) Fintech notifies Vitro thatit is exercising its Purchase Option in accordance with the Vitro Option Agreement, (iii) Vitro andFintech agree on the amount of shares of SAPI subject to the Purchase Option, (iv) Fintech complieswith all of its obligations to close the Purchase Option, and (v) Vitro fails to deliver to Fintechthe shares of SAPI subject to the Purchase Option (except if prohibited pursuant to a court order),then Vitro shall pay Fintech U.S.$126 million for liquidated damages. In such event, Fintech shallassign its beneficiary rights under the Trust Agreement to Vitro free of any liens.The Vitro Option Agreement is governed by Mexican law and subject to arbitration under the Rules ofArbitration of the Mexican Center of Arbitration (*Reglas de Arbitraje del Centro de Arbitraje deMéxico (CAM))*. The arbitration would take place in Mexico City and would be conducted in Spanish.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3728 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3728

To amend the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 to reauthorize 
 the Sangre de Cristo National Heritage Area, Cache La Poudre National 
 Heritage Area, and South Park National Heritage Area in the State of 
                   Colorado, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 2, 2022

Mr. Bennet (for himself and Mr. Hickenlooper) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 to reauthorize 
 the Sangre de Cristo National Heritage Area, Cache La Poudre National 
 Heritage Area, and South Park National Heritage Area in the State of 
                   Colorado, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Colorado National Heritage Areas 
Reauthorization Act''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN NATIONAL HERITAGE AREAS IN THE STATE 
              OF COLORADO.

    (a) Sangre De Cristo National Heritage Area.--Section 8001(i) of 
the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 (54 U.S.C. 320101 note; 
Public Law 111-11; 123 Stat. 1229) is amended by striking ``the date 
that is 15 years after the date of enactment of this Act'' and 
inserting ``September 30, 2036''.
    (b) Cache La Poudre National Heritage Area.--Section 8002(i) of the 
Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 (54 U.S.C. 320101 note; 
Public Law 111-11; 123 Stat. 1234) is amended by striking ``the date 
that is 15 years after the date of enactment of this Act'' and 
inserting ``September 30, 2036''.
    (c) South Park National Heritage Area.--Section 8003(i) of the 
Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 (54 U.S.C. 320101 note; 
Public Law 111-11; 123 Stat. 1240) is amended by striking ``the date 
that is 15 years after the date of enactment of this Act'' and 
inserting ``September 30, 2036''.
                                 <all>
```
### Proposed Provision: E1.8. Increase the payroll tax rate (currently 12.4 percent) by 0.1 percentage point each year from 2026-2031, until the rate reaches 13.0 percent for 2031 and later.
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9676]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4102]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP94-575-000]

El Paso Natural Gas Company; Notice of Site Visit

February 14, 1955.
    On February 23 through 24, 1995, members of the environmental staff 
of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) will conduct a site 
visit to facilities being proposed by El Paso Natural Gas Company (El 
Paso) in the above docket. The site visit will include an inspection of 
the proposed route of the San Juan Triangle Expansion Project loop 
pipeline in San Juan County, New Mexico.
    Because the proposed loop would be on allotted, trust, and 
reservation lands administered by the Navajo Nation, the number of 
people who may participate in the site visit it limited. Interested 
parties should contact Jeanene Hafen of El Paso at (915) 541-3410. All 
parties who attend must provide their own transportation. For any other 
information, contact Paul Friedman, the FERC Environmental Project 
Manager, at (202) 208-1108.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-4102 Filed 2-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 15, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50673

IN RE: MARSHALL’S VISTA LTD; MARSHALL’S HARBOR LTD,

Debtors.

KEMP W. GORTHEY,

Appellant,

v.

VESTIN MORTGAGE, INC.,

Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas, Austin

USDC No. 1:05-CV-648

--------------------

Before GARWOOD, SMITH, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District

of Texas, Austin Division, issued an order of sanctions against

Appellant, Kemp Gorthey, who is lead counsel for Point

Construction, Inc. Gorthey subsequently appealed to the United

States District Court for the Western District of Texas, and the

district court affirmed the sanctions order. Gorthey timely

appeals to this Court.

The facts of this case are fully set forth in the memorandum
2

opinions of both the bankruptcy court and district court. A

bankruptcy court’s decision to impose sanctions is discretionary,

therefore appellate review is for an abuse of discretion. In re

First City Bancorporation, 282 F.3d 864, 867 (5th Cir. 2002). 

The bankruptcy court determined that (1) the claims raised

by Gorthey for a constitutional and/or statutory lien had no

basis in fact or law; (2) the caselaw cited by Gorthey did not

support a reasonable argument for the extension of existing law;

(3) Gorthey’s claims were objectively frivolous and raised only

for the improper purpose of delay; and (4) Gorthey failed to

adequately review the facts and evidence supporting his claims.

After considering the oral arguments and reviewing the

briefs and record on appeal, we are not persuaded that the

bankruptcy court abused its discretion by issuing sanctions

against Gorthey. Accordingly we AFFIRM.

AFFIRMED.
## Detailed Single Year Tables

- Individual Provisions
- Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable)

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						E2.16: Apply OASDI 12.4 percent payroll tax rate on earnings above $250,000 starting in 2024, and tax all earnings once the current-law taxable maximum exceeds $250,000. Increase the computed level of the SSA average wage index for years after 2023 by amounts ranging from 0.6 percent for 2024 to 0.9 percent for 2034 and later.  Provide benefit credit for earnings above the current-law taxable maximum that are subject to the payroll tax, using a secondary PIA formula. This secondary PIA formula involves: (1) an "AIME+" derived from annual earnings from each year after 2023 that were in excess of that year's current-law taxable maximum; and (2) a formula factor of 2 percent on this newly computed "AIME+".**

### Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program

### Summarized Estimates
EXHIBIT 32.2

       CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NASB Financial, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Rhonda Nyhus, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.


May 9, 2008                 By:  /s/ Rhonda Nyhus
                                 Rhonda Nyhus
                                 Vice President and Treasurer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to NASB Financial, Inc. and will be retained by NASB
Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.



This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein , and not for
any other purpose.

<Page>
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Trust Fund Investment in Equities | Description of Proposed Provision:      Invest 40 percent of the Trust Funds in equities (phased in 2010-2024), assuming an ultimate 6.4 percent real rate of return on equities |
|-----------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                   |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2009 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified August 26, 2009 |
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and GraphsUpdated May 3, 2006   |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|

| Level of Monthly Benefits (PIA) | Description of Proposed Provision:      Reduce benefits by 3 percent for those newly eligible for benefits in 2006 and later |
|---------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2005 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map |
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 8, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
135197 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 135197 COA: 277843 Wayne CC: 93-002433-05 BRUCE ALAN HOWARD, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 28, 2007 order of the Court of Appeal s is considered, and it is DE NIED, because the defendant’s motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).

s1217 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 8, 2008

Clerk
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


                             UTOPIA MARKETING, INC.
                          (FORMERLY SAM & LIBBY, INC.)


                 STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                       YEAR ENDED
                                                                    -------------------------------------------------
                                                                    DECEMBER 28,       DECEMBER 30,      DECEMBER 31,
                                                                        1996              1995              1994
                                                                        ----              ----              ----
                                                                          (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


<S>                                                                  <C>              <C>                <C>
Loss from continuing operations                                      $ (2,675)        $   (3,773)        $   (3,789)
Extraordinary gain                                                      1,288                  -                  -
                                                                     --------         ----------         ----------
Net (loss) income                                                    $ (1,387)        $    3,773         $   (3,789)
                                                                     ========         ==========         ==========

Computation of common and common equivalent
  shares outstanding:
     Common stock                                                      12,136             10,878             10,800
                                                                     --------         ----------         ----------
     Common and common equivalent shares used in
       computing per share amounts                                     12,136             10,878             10,800
                                                                     ========         ==========         ==========

Loss per share from continuing operations                            $  (0.22)        $    (0.35)        $    (0.35)
Extraordinary gain                                                      (0.11)                                 -
                                                                     --------         ----------         ----------
Net loss per share                                                   $  (0.11)        $    (0.35)        $    (0.35)
                                                                     ========         ==========         ==========
</TABLE>