6886 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 9, 2016 / Notices 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–980] 

Certain Rack Mountable Power 

Distribution Units; Commission 

Decision Not To Review an Initial 

Determination Terminating the 

Investigation in Its Entirety Based on a 

Settlement Agreement; Termination of 

the Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review the presiding administrative law 

judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination 

(‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 1) terminating the 

investigation in its entirety based on a 

settlement agreement. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Robert Needham, Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–5468. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http://

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on January 12, 2016, based on a 

complaint filed by Server Technology, 

Inc. (‘‘STI’’), of Reno, Nevada. 81 FR 

1441–42. The complaint alleges 

violations of section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 

1337, in the importation into the United 

States, the sale for importation, and the 

sale within the United States after 

importation of certain rack mountable 

power distribution units through the 

infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent Nos. 7,162,521; 7,400,493; 

7,414,329; 7,447,002; 7,567,430; 

7,706,134; 8,541,907; 8,601,291; and 

8,694,272. Id. at 1441. The 

Commission’s notice of investigation 

named as respondents Raritan 

Americas, Inc., of Somerset, New Jersey; 

Legrand North America, of West 

Hartford, Connecticut; and Legrand SA 

of Limoges Cedex, France (collectively, 

‘‘Respondents’’). Id. at 1442. The Office 

of Unfair Import Investigation was not 

named as a party to the investigation. Id. 

On January 8, 2016, STI filed an 

unopposed motion to terminate the 

investigation based on a settlement 

agreement. No party responded to the 

motion. 

On January 12, 2016, the ALJ issued 

the subject ID, granting the motion. The 

ALJ found that STI attached the 

settlement agreement, and stated that 

there were no other agreements between 

STI and Respondents concerning the 

subject matter of the investigation. The 

ALJ also found that there is no 

indication that terminating the 

investigation based on settlement would 

harm the public interest. No party 

petitioned for review of the subject ID. 

The Commission has determined not 

to review the subject ID. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 

210). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: February 3, 2016. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2016–02416 Filed 2–8–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–936] 

Certain Footwear Products: 

Commission Determination To Reviewin-Part a Final Initial Determination 

Finding a Violation of Section 337; and 

To Request Written Submissions 

Regarding the Issues Under Review 

and Remedy, Bonding, and the Public 

Interest 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined to reviewin-part a final initial determination 

(‘‘ID’’) of the presiding administrative 

law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) finding a violation of 

section 337 in the above-captioned 

investigation. The Commission is also 

requesting written submissions 

regarding the issues under review and 

remedy, bonding, and the public 

interest. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–2310. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http://

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on November 17, 2014, based on a 

complaint filed on behalf of Converse 

Inc. of North Andover, Massachusetts. 

79 FR 68482–83. The complaint alleges 

violations of section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 

1337, by reason of infringement of 

certain U.S. Trademark Registration 

Nos.: 4,398,753 (‘‘the ’753 trademark’’); 

3,258,103 (‘‘the ’103 trademark’’); and 

1,588,960 (‘‘the ’960 trademark’’). The 

complaint further alleges violations of 

section 337 based upon unfair 

competition/false designation of origin, 

common law trademark infringement 

and unfair competition, and trademark 

dilution, the threat or effect of which is 

to destroy or substantially injure an 

industry in the United States. The 

Commission’s notice of investigation 

named numerous respondents including 

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. of Bentonville, 

Arkansas; Skechers U.S.A., Inc. of 

Manhattan Beach, California; and 

Highline United LLC d/b/a Ash 

Footwear USA of New York City, New 

York. The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) is also a party to 

the investigation. Id. New Balance 

Athletic Shoe, Inc. (‘‘New Balance’’) of 

Boston, Massachusetts was 

subsequently added as a respondentintervenor. See Order No. 36 

(unreviewed, Comm’n Notice Feb. 19, 

2015). Only these four respondents 

remain active in the investigation. All 

other respondents, as detailed below, 

have been found in default or have been 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES