alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3613 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3613

    To prohibit the housing of chimpanzees at installations of the 
                      Department of the Air Force.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 9, 2022

Mr. Kennedy (for himself, Ms. Duckworth, Mr. Cassidy, and Mr. Heinrich) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
          Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit the housing of chimpanzees at installations of the 
                      Department of the Air Force.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Chimp Sanctuary Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON HOUSING OF CHIMPANZEES AT INSTALLATIONS OF THE 
              AIR FORCE.

    (a) In General.--On or after the date that is 180 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force may 
not house chimpanzees at any installation of the Department of the Air 
Force.
    (b) Transport of Chimpanzees.--
            (1) In general.--Any chimpanzees currently housed at an 
        installation of the Department of the Air Force shall be 
        transported to Chimp Haven in Louisiana, beginning not later 
        than the date of the enactment of this Act.
            (2) Completion of transport.--All transport of chimpanzees 
        required under paragraph (1) shall be completed by not later 
        than the date that is 180 days after the date of the enactment 
        of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 8350]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3658]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[FE Docket No. 95-04-NG]


Selkirk Cogen Partners, L.P. ; Order Granting Blanket 
Authorization To Import and Export Natural Gas From and to Canada

AGENCY: Office of Fossil Energy, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Fossil Energy of the Department of Energy gives 
notice that it has issued an order granting Selkirk Cogen Partners, 
L.P. authorization to import from and to export to Canada up to a total 
of 57 Bcf of natural gas. The term of the authorization is for a period 
of two years, beginning on the date of first import or export after 
January 20, 1995.
    Selkirk's order is available for inspection and copying in the 
Office of Fuels Programs Docket Room, 3F-056, Forrestal Building, 1000 
Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20585, (202) 586-9478. The 
docket room is open between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., 
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

    Issued in Washington, D.C., January 30, 1995.
Clifford P. Tomaszewski,
Director, Office of Natural Gas, Office of Fuels Programs, Office of 
Fossil Energy.
[FR Doc. 95-3658 Filed 2-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-40199

Summary Calendar 

 

JERRY MACK DORROUGH, 

 

 Petitioner-Appellant, 

versus 

MICHAEL GAINES, Commissioner, U.S. Parole Commission of 

the U.S. Department of Justice; LILLIE BOGAN, Director, 

Child Support Enforcement Program, Florida Department 

of Revenue; UNIDENTIFIED PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR, and all 

other persons acting as agents on behalf of Lillie Bogan,

Child Support Enforcement Program, 

 

 Respondents-Appellees. 

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:01-CV-589

--------------------

August 23, 2002

Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jerry Mack Dorrough (“Dorrough”) appeals the district

court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus

under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The district court dismissed the

petition as improvidently filed because it was filed in violation
No. 02-40199

-2-

of a sanction order. Dorrough reargues the merits of his

petition and argues that this court has erred in rejecting his

claims that his 1963 guilty-plea conviction for robbery of a

postal employee was invalid. He moves for an order staying a

pending parole revocation proceeding and to file a supplemental

brief.

Although Dorrough conclusionally asserts that the district

court erred in dismissing his petition, he has failed to make any

cogent factual or legal argument on that point and, therefore, he

has failed to brief the only issue for appeal. See Brinkmann v.

Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir.

1987). This appeal is without arguable merit; the pending

motions are DENIED and this appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. 

See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2. 

Dorrough is cautioned that should he, or any counsel on his

behalf, file any further frivolous pleadings relating to his 1963

conviction, in this court or any court subject to the

jurisdiction of this court, he shall be subject to sanctions. To

avoid sanctions for any matter that may be pending, Dorrough

shall review all pending matters and move to voluntarily dismiss

any that are frivolous.

MOTIONS DENIED, APPEAL DISMISSED. SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

________________

NO. 09-16-00466-CV 

________________

IN RE BRANDON BRADLEY

__________________________________________________________________

Original Proceeding

317th District Court of Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause C-188,770

__________________________________________________________________

ORDER

Relator Brandon Bradley filed an application for writ of habeas corpus. 

Bradley alleges that his confinement pursuant to the Judgment of Contempt and the 

Commitment Order signed by the Judge of the 317th District Court in Jefferson 

County, in Cause No. C-188,770, is illegal because the relator has not received the 

time credit to which he is entitled. We may order the relator’s discharge pending 

the resolution of the merits of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 52.8(b)(3).

It is, therefore, ORDERED that the relator, Brandon Bradley, is hereby 

admitted to bail upon his giving a good and sufficient bond, conditioned as 
2

required by law, in the sum of Three Hundred Dollars ($300.00), to be approved by 

the Sheriff of Jefferson County, Texas. A copy of the approved and executed bond 

shall be forwarded to the Clerk of this Court.

ORDER ENTERED December 21, 2016.

PER CURIAM

Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 33 (Friday, February 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9409]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4017]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-30, 361]


Wailuku Agribusiness Company, Inc. Pineapple Division, Wailuku, 
HI; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for 
Reconsideration

    On December 23, 1994, Local #142 of the International 
Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union (ILWU) and the company requested 
administrative reconsideration of the Department of Labor's Notice of 
Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance for workers at the subject firm. The Department's 
Negative Determination was issued on November 22, 1994 and published in 
the Federal Register on December 16, 1994 (59 FR 65076).
    A review of the findings shows that Wailuku was impacted by imports 
since its sole customer was certified for TAA (TA-W-30,229).

Conclusion

    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim 
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the Department of 
Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 10th day of February 1995.
Victor J. Trunzo,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-4017 Filed 2-16-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Skip to main content

# Social Security

Search
Menu
Español
Sign in

## The 2015 OASDI Trustees Report

Office of the Chief Actuary

Reading the Report

Table of ContentsList of TablesList of FiguresIndex

The 2015 OASDI Trustees Report, officially called       "*The 2015 Annual Report of the Board of Trustees of the Federal      Old-Age and Survivors Insurance and Federal Disability Insurance Trust Funds*,"      presents the current and projected financial status of the trust funds.      The report is available in PDF, a       printer-friendly format.

Requests for a printed copy of the 2015 Trustees Report may be submitted       by filling out our request form.

####     Related information 

Supplemental Single-Year Tables

**Documentation of Key Assumptions**
          -  	 Demographic assumptions  used in the projections that determine the actuarial status of the trust funds 	 
          -        Ultimate economic assumptions  used in the projections that determine the actuarial status of the trust funds	     

 See model documentation for a description of all assumptions and methods used in the projections. 

**Model Documentation**-       Description of the methods used in the  long      range projections  that determine the actuarial status of the trust funds
Description of the methods used in the       
short range projections
 of      trust fund operations

**Related reports**- Summary of the latest report       for the Social Security and Medicare programs (also available in       printer-friendly  PDF )
Trustees Report on the       
financial      status of the Medicare program

**Special reports on OASI or DI Trust Fund assets dropping below 20 percent of annual cost within 10 years:**- Letter to the President of the Senate
- Letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives

Footer menu
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3727 

To ensure that employees of the Internal Revenue Service are brought back 

to their offices until the backlog of 2020 tax returns has been eliminated. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 2, 2022 

Mr. KENNEDY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To ensure that employees of the Internal Revenue Service 

are brought back to their offices until the backlog of 

2020 tax returns has been eliminated. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Require Employees 

5 To Uniformly Return Now Act’’ or the ‘‘RETURN Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. BRINGING IRS EMPLOYEES BACK TO THE OFFICE. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other law, in 

8 the case of an applicable employee, such employee shall 

9 not be authorized to telework during the period— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3727 IS

1 (1) beginning on the date that is 5 business 

2 days after the date of enactment of this Act, and 

3 (2) ending on the date on which the Commis4 sioner of Internal Revenue certifies that the proc5 essing backlog with respect to income tax returns for 

6 taxable year 2020 has been eliminated. 

7 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section— 

8 (1) APPLICABLE EMPLOYEE.—The term ‘‘appli9 cable employee’’ means an employee of the Internal 

10 Revenue Service who, as of the date of enactment of 

11 this Act, is authorized to telework, on a temporary 

12 or permanent basis, pursuant to a policy established 

13 by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue in re14 sponse to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID– 

15 19). 

16 (2) TELEWORK.—The term ‘‘telework’’ has the 

17 same meaning given such term under section 

18 6501(3) of title 5, United States Code. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
DISMISS and Opinion Filed April 19, 2023 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-01034-CV 

PETER O. ONYEBUCHI, Appellant 

V. 

JACKSON EHIOGUH AND MUSTAPHA YUSUF, Appellees 

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-10931 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Nowell, Goldstein, and Breedlove 

Opinion by Justice Nowell 

Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. After appellant failed to respond to 

our inquiry regarding the reporter’s record, we ordered the appeal submitted without 

a reporter’s record and for appellant’s brief to be filed by February 8, 2023. We later 

extended the time for appellant’s brief until March 10, 2023. By postcard dated 

March 15, 2023 we informed appellant his brief was overdue and directed him to 

file his brief within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so would 

result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 
 –2– 

38.8(a)(1). To date, appellant has not filed his brief or otherwise corresponded with 

the Court regarding the status of this appeal. 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8 (a)(1); 42.3(b), 

(c). 

221034F.P05 

 

/Erin A. Nowell/

ERIN A. NOWELL 

JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

PETER O. ONYEBUCHI, Appellant 

No. 05-22-01034-CV V. 

JACKSON EHIOGUH and 

MUSTAPH YUSUF, Appellees 

 On Appeal from the 134th Judicial 

District Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-10931. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Nowell. 

Justices Goldstein and Breedlove 

participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is 

DISMISSED. 

Judgment entered this 19th day of April 2023.
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual Balance 

in 75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

B

7

-1.70% -4.20% 0.37% 0.77% -1.33% 

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2008 Trustees Report Office of the Chief A

January 29, 2009

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Retirement Age

Proposed Provision: Starting in 2012, convert all disabled worker beneficiaries to retired woattainment of their EEA (rather than their NRA). After conversion, apply the early retiremenretirement at EEA (currently 25%) times the ratio of years after 2011 (or years after attaininand before attaining age 62, to 40. Medicare eligibility would be extended to age 65 on the After 2011, disability applications would not be accepted for benefit entitlement that would sEEA.

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this 

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

0.02.04.06.08.0

10.012.014.016.018.020.0

2008 2018 2028 2038 2048 2058 2068 2078

Year

Percent

Cost rates with this provisionCost rates under present lawIncome rates with this provisionIncome rates under present law

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

 (assets as a percentage of annual expe

0

100200300400500600700800900

1000

2008 2018 2028 2038 2048 2058 

Year

Percent

Present law With this p
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00268-CV

OVIDIO GARCIA, JR.

v.

OMAR ESCOBAR, RAMON DE LA CRUZ AND UNKNOWN PERSONS AND/OR 

ENTITIES

On Appeal from the

93rd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. C-181-11-B

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed in part and reversed 

in part, and the case should be remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the 

judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED IN PART and REVERSED IN PART, and the 

case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Costs of the 

appeal are adjudged 50% against appellant and against appellee, although appellant is 

exempt from payment due to his inability to pay costs.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

April 15, 2015
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
 
                                     RETIX
 
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                      OTHER NAME(S)
                                         JURISDICTION                UNDER WHICH THE
                                              OF                     SUBSIDIARY DOES
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                      INCORPORATION                    BUSINESS
------------------                      -------------                ---------------
<S>                                <C>                      <C>
Vertel Corporation...............  California               Telaware, Telegenics
Vertel Pacific...................  California               Vertel Asia Pacific, Vertel Korea
Retix B.V........................  Netherlands              Retix Ireland, Vertel Ireland,
                                                             Vertel France, Vertel Germany,
                                                             Vertel U.K.
Wireless Solutions...............  California               Vertel, Retix Wireless
Retix Australia, Pty, Ltd........  Australia                None
Retix Property Company, Ltd......  Netherlands              Vertel U.K.
Retix Canada Inc.................  Canada                   None
Retix (Deutschland) GmbH.........  Germany                  None
Retix Europe, Ltd................  United Kingdom           Retix Network Systems
Sonoma Systems Europe, Ltd.......  United Kingdom           Retix Network Systems
Recodif Retix France (TM)........  France                   None
Retix Italia SARL................  Italy                    None
Retix V.I., Ltd..................  U.S. Virgin Islands      None
</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members         
    -  AEE Multimedia         
    -  AEE Research Library 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# PHOTOS ANDVIDEOS

Search

Search

                                - All Images 
                                - Other 
                                - Space Shuttle 

                                - Upload Date
                                - Photo Date
                                - Title

----

Download Image: Full Size (5.78 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, A Laurence Jones, President and Chief Executive Officer of Activant Solutions Inc. (the
Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section
906), that, to the best of my knowledge:  
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended December
31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Activant
Solutions Inc. and will be retained by Activant Solutions Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. By: /s/ A LAURENCE JONES
    
    2/10/05A Laurence Jones
    
    DatePresident and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 33 (Friday, February 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9422]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4033]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart Q During 
the Week Ended February 10, 1995

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
Q of the Department of Transportation's Procedural Regulations (See 14 
CFR 302.1701 et. seq.). The due date for Answers, Conforming 
Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below for each 
application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.

Docket Number: 50114
Date filed: February 6, 1995
Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: March 6, 1995
Description: Application of American Trans Air, Inc., pursuant to 49 
U.S.C. 41101 and Subpart Q of the Regulations, requests a certificate 
of public convenience and necessity authorizing ATA to engage in the 
scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail 
between the co-terminal points Indianapolis, Indiana, and Cincinnati, 
Ohio, on the one hand, and Grand Cayman Islands, on the other hand.

Docket Number: 50124
Date filed: February 9, 1995
Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: March 9, 1995
Description: Application of ABX Air, Inc., pursuant to 49 U.S.C., 
Section 41102 and Subpart Q of the Regulations, for issuance of an 
amended certificate of public convenience and necessity for Route 377, 
so as to authorize Airborne to provide foreign air transportation of 
property and mail between any point or points in the United States, on 
the one hand, and any point or points in the United States, on the one 
hand, and any point or points in Canada, on the other hand.
Myrna F. Adams,
Acting Chief, Documentary Services Division.
[FR Doc. 95-4033 Filed 2-16-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P