alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7525-7526]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3135]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Financial Assistance, the American Institute of Architects

AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy.

[[Page 7526]] ACTION: Notice of intent to award a grant based upon an 
unsolicited application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE), Golden Field Office, through 
the Chicago Regional Support Office, announces, pursuant to DOE 
Financial Assistance Rules, 10 CFR 600.14(f), its intent to award a 
grant to The American Institute of Architects (AIA) to coordinate 
technical assistance and promote the use of energy efficient and 
renewable energy technologies by the village of Pattonsburg, Missouri, 
a community that is rebuilding itself after the Midwest floods of 1993.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
On June 3, 1994, AIA submitted a proposal to assist the village of 
Valmeyer, Illinois, which, like Pattonsburg, is attempting to rebuild 
after the 1993 floods. DOE accepted this proposal and awarded AIA a 
grant in the amount of $100,000. Subsequently, AIA, DOE and the Federal 
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) jointly agreed to provide similar 
assistance to Pattonsburg. $50,000 in DOE funding was provided on 
September 30, 1994. DOE and FEMA have entered into an Interagency 
Agreement through which FEMA is providing $50,000 to support of the 
project. Given the existence of the DOE grant, FEMA and DOE have 
jointly agreed that DOE will award and administer the FEMA funds.
    The unsolicited application for support of this activity has been 
accepted by DOE and FEMA as a result of their joint determination that 
the proposed activity is meritorious, likely to be effective and 
successful, and offers a unique opportunity to mitigate the damage from 
future flood episodes (FEMA), while advancing the DOE mission of 
developing and demonstrating the use of energy efficient and renewable 
energy technologies in a practical and highly visible setting. The 
project period for the award began on July 20, 1994, and is scheduled 
to end on June 30, 1995. DOE/FEMA plan to provide funding in the amount 
of $50,000. This award will not be made for at least 14 days to allow 
for public comment.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William Becker, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of the Assistant 
Secretary, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, 1000 Independence 
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585
Doris A. Freeman, U.S. Department of Energy, Kansas City Support 
Office, 911 Walnut Street, Room 1411, Kansas City, MO 64106.

    Issued in Golden Colorado on January 24, 1995.
Matthew A. Barron,
Contracting Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-3135 Filed 2-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-10-M
Year Cost Rate

Income 

Rate

Annual 

Balance

2008 11.20 12.77 1.57 359

2009 11.26 12.81 1.54 369

2010 11.36 12.82 1.46 379

2011 11.52 12.84 1.32 387

2012 11.73 12.87 1.13 393

2013 11.98 12.90 0.92 396

2014 12.25 12.91 0.67 398

2015 12.51 12.94 0.43 398

2016 12.78 12.96 0.18 396

2017 13.05 12.98 -0.07 394

2018 13.29 12.99 -0.29 390

2019 13.53 13.01 -0.52 385

2020 13.77 13.03 -0.74 379

2021 13.98 13.04 -0.94 373

2022 14.18 13.06 -1.13 366

2023 14.37 13.07 -1.30 359

2024 14.54 13.08 -1.46 351

2025 14.70 13.09 -1.61 342

2026 14.84 13.10 -1.74 333

2027 14.97 13.12 -1.86 323

2028 15.09 13.12 -1.96 313

2029 15.18 13.13 -2.05 302

2030 15.26 13.14 -2.12 292

2031 15.30 13.14 -2.16 281

2032 15.33 13.15 -2.18 271

2033 15.33 13.15 -2.18 260

2034 15.30 13.15 -2.15 250

2035 15.26 13.15 -2.11 240

2036 15.20 13.15 -2.05 230

2037 15.13 13.15 -1.98 221

2038 15.04 13.14 -1.90 212

2039 14.94 13.14 -1.80 204

2040 14.83 13.14 -1.69 196

2041 14.72 13.13 -1.59 188

2042 14.61 13.13 -1.48 181

2043 14.50 13.12 -1.38 175

2044 14.39 13.12 -1.27 169

2045 14.30 13.11 -1.18 163

2046 14.21 13.11 -1.10 158

2047 14.13 13.11 -1.03 153

2048 14.06 13.10 -0.96 149

2049 13.99 13.10 -0.89 145

2050 13.94 13.10 -0.84 141

2051 13.90 13.10 -0.80 137

2052 13.86 13.09 -0.77 134

2053 13.83 13.09 -0.74 130

2054 13.81 13.09 -0.72 127

2055 13.80 13.09 -0.71 123

2056 13.79 13.09 -0.70 120

2057 13.79 13.09 -0.69 116

2058 13.79 13.09 -0.69 113

2059 13.79 13.09 -0.69 109

2060 13.79 13.10 -0.69 106

2061 13.80 13.10 -0.70 102

2062 13.80 13.10 -0.71 98

2063 13.81 13.10 -0.72 94

2064 13.82 13.10 -0.73 90

2065 13.84 13.10 -0.74 86

Detailed Single Year Tables

Category of Change: Level of Monthly Benefits (PIA)

Proposed Provision: For each year from 2009-2039, multiply the 32 and 15 percent formula factors by 

0.987, reducing the factors to 21 percent and 10 percent respectively, for new eligibles in 2039 and later

Expressed as a percentage of taxable payrol Trust Fund 

Ratio 

1-1-year
2066 13.86 13.10 -0.76 82

2067 13.88 13.10 -0.78 78

2068 13.90 13.10 -0.80 73

2069 13.92 13.11 -0.82 68

2070 13.95 13.11 -0.84 63

2071 13.98 13.11 -0.87 58

2072 14.01 13.11 -0.90 52

2073 14.04 13.11 -0.92 46

2074 14.07 13.11 -0.95 40

2075 14.10 13.12 -0.98 34

2076 14.13 13.12 -1.01 27

2077 14.17 13.12 -1.05 21

2078 14.20 13.12 -1.08 14

2079 14.24 13.13 -1.11 6

2080 14.28 13.13 -1.15 ----

2081 14.31 13.13 -1.18 ----

2082 14.35 13.13 -1.22 ----

2083 14.39 13.13 -1.25 ----

2084 14.42 13.14 -1.29 ----

2085 14.46 13.14 -1.32 ----

Summarized Rates: OASDI

2008 Cost Rate Income Rate

Actuarial 

Balance

-2082 14.00% 13.85% -0.15% 1.55%

Office of the Chief Actuary, Social Security

Estimates based on Intermediate Assumptions of the 2008 Trustees Report

Change in 

Actuarial Balance

July 17, 2008
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00680-CV

Armstrong McCall, LP, Appellant

v.

Amcobeauty Corporation, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 419TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-08–003311, HONORABLE STEPHEN YELENOSKY, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Armstrong McCall, LP has filed Appellant’s Unopposed Motion to Dismiss

Interlocutory Appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss this appeal.

 

G. Alan Waldrop, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Waldrop and Henson

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: January 7, 2009
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6460

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

R. KEITH NEELY, a/k/a Robert Keith Neely,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District

Judge. (CR-92-78-R, CA-99-742)

Submitted: October 16, 2002 Decided: October 31, 2002

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed in part and dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam

opinion.

R. Keith Neely, Appellant Pro Se. Ruth Elizabeth Plagenhoef,

Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

R. Keith Neely seeks to appeal the district court’s orders

denying his motions filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) and Fed. R.

Crim. P. 33. Neely has also filed a motion for a certificate of

appealability. As to Neely’s § 2255 and Rule 33 motions, we have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the

recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Neely’s Rule 33 motion

and dismiss his appeal of the denial of his § 2255 motion for the

reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Neely,

Nos. CR-92-78-R; CA-99-742 (W.D. Va. Feb. 21, 2002). Because Neely

has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right, we deny a certificate of appealability. See

28 U.S.C. § 2253 (2000). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable) | Description of Proposed Provision:      Apply 3 percent payroll tax rate on earnings over $200,000 in 2017, with the $200,000 threshold wage-indexed after 2017.  Give proportional benefit credit for additional earnings in AIME for benefit computation. |
|-------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                           |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2009 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified May 14, 2010 |
SCPW-13-0000019
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I
VESTAL K. SIMEONA, Petitioner,

vs. NEIL ABERCROMBIE, in his official capacity as Governor, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and McKenna, JJ., and Circuit Judge Ahn, in place of Pollack, J., recused) Upon consideration of petitioner Vestal K. Simeona’s petition for a writ of mandamus, which was filed on January 10, 2013, and the documents attached thereto and submitted in support thereof, it appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate that he has a clear and indisputable right to be released from custody. Moreover, petitioner may seek relief in the circuit court and by way of appeal, as appropriate. Petitioner, therefore, is not entitled to mandamus relief. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai # i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-13-0000019 19-FEB-2013 08:43 AM2

of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, February 19, 2013. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Karen S.S. Ahn
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of American Superconductor Corporation (the Company) for the year ended March 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned,
Daniel P. McGahn, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/S/ DANIEL P. MCGAHN   
|Daniel P. McGahn       
|Chief Executive Officer

June 8, 2012
EXHIBIT 99

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The  undersigned, Dr. Alphichart Fufuangvanich and Terrance C. Cuff, hereby
jointly  certify  as  follows:

     (a)  They  are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer,
          respectively,  of  The  Topaz  Group,  Inc.  (the  "Company");

     (b)  To the best of their knowledge, the Company's Quarterly Report on Form
          10-Q  for  the  quarter ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") complies in
          all  material  respects  with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
          Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended;  and

     (c)  To the best of their knowledge, based upon a review of the Report, the
          information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
          Company  for  the  period  certified.

Dated:  August  19,  2002             By: /s/  Dr.  Alphichart  Fufuangvanich
                                          -----------------------------------
                                          Dr.  Alphichart  Fufuangvanich
                                          President  (Chief  Executive  Officer)

Dated:  August  19,  2002             By: /s/  Terrance  C.  Cuff
                                          -----------------------------------
                                          Terrance  C.  Cuff
                                          Chief Financial Officer

                                       14
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Trust Fund Investment in Equities | Description of Proposed Provision:      Gradually invest 15 percent of OASDI trust fund assets in a broad index of equity market securities (such as the Wilshire 5000), assuming an ultimate 6.4 percent annual real rate of return on equities.  Increase the portion in equities by 1.5 percent each year 2010 through 2019.  Maintain the percentage at 15 percent thereafter. |
|-----------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                   |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2009 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified April 12, 2010 |
EX-10.2


  Exhibit 10.2

    

  FORM OF AMENDMENT TO CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT

  (NEOs OTHER THAN CEO)

    

  This Amendment is dated as of December 14, 2022 by and between Methode Electronics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and [_____________] (the “Executive”).

  WITNESSETH

  WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive are party to a Change in Control Agreement dated as of [______________] (such agreement, as previously amended, the “Change in Control Agreement”).

  WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Change in Control Agreement as set forth herein, and the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company has approved such change.

  AGREEMENT

  NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the parties, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, as follows:

  1.  Amendment to Section 1(b).  Section 1(b) of the Change in Control Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:

              (b)        Bonus.  The Company shall make a lump sum cash payment to Executive equal to two times the Executive’s target annual bonus amount for the fiscal year in which Executive’s Employment Termination occurs; provided, however, that if the target annual bonus amount for the fiscal year has not yet been determined as of the date of the Executive’s Employment Termination, then the bonus amount payable hereunder shall be calculated based on the Executive’s target annual bonus amount for the previous fiscal year, regardless of whether such bonus was actually earned.

  2.  No Other Changes.  Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, the Change in Control Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and delivered this Amendment as of the date set forth above.

    

  		
	EXECUTIVE:
  
  
                                                             
[__________________]
	METHODE ELECTRONICS, INC.
  
  
By:                                                       
      Bruce K. Crowther
      Chair, Compensation Committee
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 5 (Monday, January 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 2385]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-390]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Project No. 2705-000]


City of Seattle, Notice of Authorization for Continued Project 
Operation

January 3, 1995.
    On September 30, 1992, the City of Seattle, licensee for the 
Newhalem Creek Project No. 2705, filed an application for a new or 
subsequent license pursuant to the Federal Power Act (FPA) and the 
Commission's regulations thereunder. Project No. 2705 is located on 
Newhalem Creek in Whatcom County, Washington.
    The license for Project No. 2705 was issued for a period ending 
December 31, 1994. Section 15(a)(1) of the FPA, 16 U.S.C. 808(a)(1), 
requires the Commission, at the expiration of a license term, to issue 
from year to year an annual license to the then licensee under the 
terms and conditions of the prior license until a new license is 
issued, or the project is otherwise disposed of as provided in Section 
15 or any other applicable section of the FPA. If the project's prior 
license waived the applicability of Section 15 of the FPA, then, based 
on Section 9(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 558(c), 
and as set forth at 18 CFR 16.21(a), if the licensee of such project 
has filed an application for a subsequent license, the licensee may 
continue to operate the project in accordance with the terms and 
conditions of the license after the minor or minor part license 
expires, until the Commission acts on its application. If the licensee 
of such a project has not filed an application for a subsequent 
license, then it may be required, pursuant to 18 CFR 16.21(b), to 
continue project operations until the Commission issues someone else a 
license for the project or otherwise orders disposition of the project.
    If the project is subject to Section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that an annual license for Project No. 2705 is issued to 
the City of Seattle for a period effective January 1, 1995, through 
December 31, 1995, or until the issuance of a new license for the 
project or other disposition under the FPA, whichever comes first. If 
issuance of a new license (or other disposition) does not take place on 
or before December 31, 1995, notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 
18 CFR 16.18(c), an annual license under Section 15(a)(1) of the FPA is 
renewed automatically without further order or notice by the 
Commission, unless the Commission orders otherwise.
    If the project is not subject to Section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that the City of Seattle is authorized to continue 
operation of the Newhalem Creek Project No. 2705 until such time as the 
Commission acts on its application for subsequent license.
Lois D. Cashell
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-390 Filed 1-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, T. Edwin Stinson, Jr., Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Florida Banks,Inc.;
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport;
 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;
 b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and
 c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
 b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.        Date: May 14, 2004 /s/ T. Edwin Stinson, Jr.   T. Edwin Stinson, Jr.   Chief Financial Officer