alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual Balance 

in 75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Ann

Balan

75th 

-1.92% -5.70% 0.00% 0.00% -1.92% -5.7

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2005 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actu

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Trust Fund Investment in Equities

Proposed Provision: Invest 40 percent of the Trust Funds in equities (phased in 2006-2020), ultimate 3 percent real rate of return on equities, the same as the assumed ultimate yield on issue Social Security trust fund bonds

January 4, 2006

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this prov

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

0.005.00

10.0015.0020.0025.00

2005 2015 2025 2035 2045 2055 2065 2075

Year

Percent

Cost rates with this provisionCost rates under present lawIncome rates with this provisionIncome rates under present law

OASDI tax rate schedule 

(employees and employers, each)

1993 and later 6.2%

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditu

0

100200300400500600700800900

1000

2005 2015 2025 2035 2045 205

Year

Percent

Present law with thi
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 23 (Thursday, February 4, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 6005]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02214]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

[BAC 6735-01]


Sunshine Act Notice

February 1, 2016.

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, February 11, 2016.

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20004 (enter from F Street 
entrance).

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  The Commission will consider and act upon 
the following in open session: Secretary of Labor v. Premier Elkhorn 
Coal Company, Docket No. KENT 2011-827, and Secretary of Labor v. 
Trivette Trucking, Docket No. KENT 2011-1223. (Issues include whether 
the Judge erred in vacating a citation alleging that a truck driver had 
failed to maintain control of his truck and in excluding certain 
evidence from the record.)
    Any person attending this meeting who requires special 
accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 
interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. 
Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and Sec.  2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFO:  Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935/(202) 
708-9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Sarah L. Stewart,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2016-02214 Filed 2-2-16; 11:15 am]
 BILLING CODE 6735-01-P
Document

Exhibit 10.1


COUPA SOFTWARE INCORPORATED
AMENDMENT TO THE
SEVERANCE AND CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT


This Amendment No. 1 to the Severance and Change in Control Agreement (the “Amendment”) is made and entered into by and between the individual identified in the Executive signature block below (“Executive”) and Coupa Software Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), effective as of October [  ], 2022.


The Company and Executive are parties to a Severance and Change in Control Agreement, dated [   ]1 (the “Agreement”), and wish to amend the Agreement to extend its term.


The Company and Executive agree as follows:


1.Amendment of Agreement. The words “October 12, 2022” in Section 1 of the Agreement are hereby replaced with the words “October 12, 2025”.


2.Miscellaneous Provisions.


(a)Effect on Agreement. Except as amended herein, all of the terms of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


(b)Choice of Law. The validity, interpretation, construction and performance of this Amendment shall be governed by the internal substantive laws, but not the conflicts of law rules, of the State of California.


(c)Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.


3.At-Will Employment. Nothing contained in this Amendment shall (a) confer upon Executive any right to continue in the employ of the Company, (b) constitute any contract or agreement of employment, or (c) interfere in any way with the at-will nature of Executive’s employment with the Company.


[Signatures Follow]


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has executed this Amendment, in the case of the Company by its duly authorized officer, as of the day and year indicated above.


COMPANY
By:  
Name: 
Title:


EXECUTIVE
By:  
Name: 
Title:






















1 Insert the date of each Executive’s Agreement.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANTS CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             206
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,639
<ALLOWANCES>                                       487
<INVENTORY>                                     25,976
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,116
<PP&E>                                          28,524
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,470
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  99,137
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,344
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            53
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,474
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    99,137
<SALES>                                        108,903
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               108,903
<CGS>                                           80,247
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,661
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   243
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   111
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,154
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,598
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,344
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,254
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  2,078
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,176
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20


</TABLE>
(iv) A notification has been delivered certifying (a) that Fintech Advisory Inc. isthe sole administrator of Fintech with respect to the asset trust (the “Asset Trust”)created pursuant to the trust agreement dated December 15, 2009 (the “TrustAgreement”), the Vitro Option Agreement and the Option Agreement, and (b) that Mr.David Martinez Guzman has the authority to establish Fintech Advisory Inc.’s orFintech’s investment guidelines with respect to the operation contemplated in theTrust Agreement, the Vitro Option Agreement and the Option Agreement; (v) Subject to the provisions related to foreign investment in Vitro shares, acertification by Fintech must be delivered stating that Fintech’s affiliate appointedto exercise Purchase Option O and Purchase Option P is controlled by Mr. David MartinezGuzman; and (vi) The relevant real estate assets must remain part of the Asset Trust.Vitro’s right to exercise the Repurchase Option is subject to the following two conditions:(i) Fintech must have exercised the Purchase Options and (ii) all the requisite governmentalauthorizations must have been obtained.As consideration for Fintech’s exercise of the Purchase Options, Fintech will assign to theGrantors its beneficiary rights under the Trust Agreement free of any liens. If Fintech isprohibited for any reason (other than for reasons attributable to Fintech) to exercise the PurchaseOption SAPI or the option under the Vitro Option Agreement, the value of the Vitro shares will becalculated pursuant to the formula set out in the Option Agreement. As consideration for theRepurchase Option, Vitro will make a payment to Fintech pursuant to a formula set out in the OptionAgreement which is based on the enterprise value per share of SAPI.Fintech’s right to exercise the Purchase Options will commence on the date the RestructuringAgreement is executed and will remain in effect for three years following that date, subject to theautomatic termination of the Option Agreement under certain conditions. Vitro’s Repurchase Optionmay be exercised during the three years following Fintech’s exercise of the Purchase Options,subject to certain limitations. If (i) the Restructuring Agreement has not been executed byDecember 15, 2019, (ii) the relevant real estate assets are no longer part of the Asset Trust or(iii) the Trust Agreement has been terminated, the Option Agreement will be automaticallyterminated.The Option Agreement is governed by Mexican law and subject to arbitration under the Rules ofArbitration of the Mexican Center of Arbitration (*Reglas de Arbitraje del Centro de Arbitraje deMéxico (CAM))*. The arbitration would take place in Mexico City and would be conducted in Spanish.
Exhibit
10.26


 


PROMISSORY NOTE


 


	
  Amount
  $100,000

  	
   

  	
  June 18,
  2009

  



 


For
value received, the undersigned, GeoPetro Resources Company (“Payor”), hereby
promises to pay on demand to Stuart J. Doshi (“Holder”) the principal sum of
One Hundred Thousand ($100,000) with interest from June 18, 2009 at a rate
of eight percent (8%) per annum, payable upon repayment of the loan.


 


 


	
  Signed
  by:

  	
   

  
	
  GeoPetro
  Resources Company

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/
  J. Chris Steinhauser

  	
   

  
	
  J.
  Chris Steinhauser

  	
   

  
	
  Chief
  Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3470 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3470

To provide for the implementation of certain trafficking in contracting 
                  provisions, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 11 (legislative day, January 10), 2022

Mr. Lankford (for himself and Ms. Ernst) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the implementation of certain trafficking in contracting 
                  provisions, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``End Human Trafficking in Government 
Contracts Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. IMPLEMENTATION OF TRAFFICKING IN CONTRACTING PROVISIONS.

    (a) Requirement To Refer Violations to Agency Suspension and 
Debarment Official.--Section 1704(c)(1) of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 22 U.S.C. 
7104b(c)(1)) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``refer the matter to the agency 
        suspension and debarment official and'' before ``consider 
        taking one of the following actions''; and
            (2) by striking subparagraph (G).
    (b) Report on Implementation of Trafficking in Contracting 
Provisions.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of 
this Act, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall 
submit to Congress a report on implementation of title XVII of the 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 
112-239; 126 Stat. 2092).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.1



                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, Barry Tenzer, Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of
Associated Automotive Group Incorporated (the "Registrant"), certify to the best
of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
the period ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") of the Registrant, that:

    (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

    (2)  The information contained in the Report, fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Registrant.


                                                 By:/s/ Barry Tenzer
                                                    ---------------------
                                                    Barry Tenzer
                                                    Date: August 23, 2002
## Detailed Single Year Tables

- Individual Provisions
- Coverage of Employment or Earnings, or Inclusion of Other Sources of Revenue

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						F2: Starting in 2024, exempt individuals with more than 180 quarters of coverage from the OASDI payroll tax. Earnings exempted from OASDI payroll tax would not be used in computing benefits.**

### Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program

### Summarized Estimates
_______________________________________ __ 

### Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



## September 9, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


## 136633 Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n 

## PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, J ustices



## v SC: 136633 COA: 284072 Ionia CC: 06-013398-FH JOSHUA ROBERT FARRAR, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 16, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0828 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 9, 2008

Clerk
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 17

- 00623

- CV IN THE INTEREST OF M .R.G. , G.H., III, and L.M.G. From the 225th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2016PA01168 Honorable Stephani A. Walsh , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice Delivered and Filed: November 1, 2017
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION ; MOTION TO ABATE DENIED On September 26, 2017, a ppellant’s court

- appointed attorney ad litem filed a notice of appeal, affirmatively representing to this court that the trial court signed an order terminating appellant’s parental rights “ on or about September 8, 2017. ” The notice of appeal used a minor’s name in violation of Texas Rules of Appella te Procedure 9.8 and 9.9. On October 2, 2017, we ordered appellant’s attorney ad litem to file , by October 5, 2017, an amended notice of appeal that complied with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. On October 4, 2017, the trial court clerk filed a cl erk’s record showing appellant had been appointed

a new attor ney ad litem for purposes of this appeal, but the clerk’s record did not contain an order terminating appellant’s parental rights. No amended notice of appeal was filed.04

- 17

- 00623

- CV

- 2

- We thereafter issued an other order directing appellant’s attorney ad litem for this appeal to file, by October 16, 2017, t he amen ded notice of appeal and a response showing why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. On October 16, 2017 , appellant’s attorne y ad litem for this appeal filed an amended notice of appeal and a “motion to abate appeal deadlines.” The motion states, “ Appellant’s parental rights were not terminated after a bench trial. Notice of appeal was given without a signed Final Order. ” T he mo tion “requests an abatement of the appeal deadline until a final order is filed. ” A ppellant’s motion does not otherwise address this court’s appellate jurisdiction

. The amended notice of appeal also states the “final decree of termination

. . . has not bee n signed to date.” To be appealable, a judgment or order must be written and signed by the trial court. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 26.1 ( providing the appellate timetable runs from the date the judgment or order is signed ). An oral ruling, not reduced to writing and signed by the trial court, is not a final or otherwise appealable judgment or order. Farmer v. Ben E. Keith Co. , 907 S.W.2d 495, 496 (Tex. 1995) (per curiam)

. We are not required “ to docket and hold an appeal open until there is an appealable judgment or order at some future date. ” Ganesan v. Reeves , 236 S.W.3d 816, 817 (Tex. App.

— Waco 2007, pet. denied) . When, as here, there is no appealable judgment or order, we must dismiss the appeal. See id. (citing T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(a), 44.3). We therefore deny appellant’s motion to abate and dismiss this appeal. See id.

PER CURIAM
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3470 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 384
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3470

                          [Report No. 117-116]

To provide for the implementation of certain trafficking in contracting 
                  provisions, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 11 (legislative day, January 10), 2022

Mr. Lankford (for himself and Ms. Ernst) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                              May 24, 2022

               Reported by Mr. Peters, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the implementation of certain trafficking in contracting 
                  provisions, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``End Human Trafficking in Government 
Contracts Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. IMPLEMENTATION OF TRAFFICKING IN CONTRACTING PROVISIONS.

    (a) Requirement To Refer Violations to Agency Suspension and 
Debarment Official.--Section 1704(c)(1) of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 22 U.S.C. 
7104b(c)(1)) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``refer the matter to the agency 
        suspension and debarment official and'' before ``consider 
        taking one of the following actions''; and
            (2) by striking subparagraph (G).
    (b) Report on Implementation of Trafficking in Contracting 
Provisions.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of 
this Act, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall 
submit to Congress a report on implementation of title XVII of the 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 
112-239; 126 Stat. 2092).
                                                       Calendar No. 384

117th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3470

                          [Report No. 117-116]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To provide for the implementation of certain trafficking in contracting 
                  provisions, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 24, 2022

                       Reported without amendment
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                                   CORE, INC.

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


The following corporations are wholly-owned subsidiaries of CORE, INC.:

     Core Management, Inc. (a Delaware corporation)
     Cost Review Services, Inc. (a Texas corporation)
     CORE Securities Corp. (a Massachusetts corporation)
     Protocol Work Systems, Inc. (a Delaware corporation)
     SSDC Corp. (a Delaware corporation)
     TCM Services, Inc. (a Delaware corporation)

The following corporations are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Core Management,
Inc. (a Delaware corporation)

     Integrated Behavioral Health (a California corporation)
     Core Management, Inc. (a California corporation)

NOTE:  AmHealth Clinics Corp. (a Delaware corporation) was dissolved on 
       February 2, 1998.
#### STATE v. L. B. COLEMAN.

(Filed 9 November, 1955.)

Criminal Law § 62f—

Where defendant appeals from judgment imposing a suspended sentence, and there is no error in the trial, the cause must be remanded for proper judgment, since the suspended sentence cannot stand in the absence of defendant's consent thereto.

Appeal by defendant from *Martin, Special Judge,*May Term, 1955, of WaKe.

Criminal prosecution tried upon a warrant charging the defendant with the operation of a motor vehicle on the public roads of North Carolina and on the streets of the City of Raleigh while under the influence of intoxicating liquor.

The jury returned a verdict of guilty and the court sentenced the defendant for a term of four months in the common jail of Wake County, to be assigned to work the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission, prison sentence to be suspended for a period of two years upon the payment of a fine of $100.00 and costs and the compliance with certain conditions set forth in the judgment.

The defendant appeals, assigning error.

*Attorney-General Rodman and Assistant Attorney-General Bruton ■for the State.*

*Alphonso Lloyd and Carl E. Gaddy, Jr., for defendant.*

PeR Cueiam.

We have examined the defendant’s exceptions and assignments of error directed to the admission of certain evidence. In our opinion no sufficient prejudicial error has been shown to warrant a. new trial. Likewise, the defendant’s motion for judgment as of nonsuit was properly denied.

However, since the defendant did not consent to the suspension of the sentence entered below, or the conditions imposed, the judgment entered is stricken out and the cause remanded for proper judgment. *S. v. Cole,*
      *110241 N.C. 576, 86 S.E. 2d 203; *S. v. Eason,*242 N.C. 59, 86 S.E. 2d 774; *S. v. Harvey,*242 N.C. 111, 86 S.E. 2d 793.

Error and remanded.
## Summary Measures and Graphs

- Individual Provisions
- Level of Monthly Benefits

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						B4.1: Increase the number of years used to calculate benefits for retirees and survivors (but not for disabled workers) from 35 to 38, phased in over the years 2024-2028.**

|  |  |
|--|--|