alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CSB Bancorp, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this annual report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;
 c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and
 d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Paula J. MeilerPaula J. MeilerSenior Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 23.1

                          CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement 
(Form S-8 No. 33-59740) pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1986 Stock 
Option Plan, 1991 Stock Option Plan and Stock Option Plan for Directors of 
Peer Review Analysis, Inc., and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 
333-00354) pertaining to the CORE, INC. 1991 Stock Option Plan, as amended, 
and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-4144) pertaining to the 
CORE, INC. 1991 Stock Option Plan, as amended, and in the Registration 
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-15261) pertaining to the CORE, INC. 1991 Stock 
Option Plan, as amended, and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 
333-16961) pertaining to the CORE, INC. 1991 Stock Option Plan, as amended, 
and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-52923) pertaining to the 
CORE, INC. 1991 Stock Option Plan, as amended, Core Management, Inc. Employee 
Stock Option Plan and other Stock Options, of our report dated March 26, 
1999, to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of CORE, INC. 
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 
1998.

                                   /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Orange County, California
March 26, 1999
## Summary Measures and Graphs

- Individual Provisions
- Level of Monthly Benefits

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						B2.1: Beginning with those newly eligible for OASI benefits in 2033, multiply the PIA factors by the ratio of life expectancy at 67 for 2028 to the life expectancy at age 67 for the 4th year prior to the year of benefit eligibility. Unisex life expectancies, based on period life tables as computed by SSA's Office of the Chief Actuary, are used to determine the ratio. Disabled workers are: (a) not affected prior to normal retirement age; and (b) subject to a proportional reduction in benefits, based on the worker's years of disability, upon conversion to retired-worker beneficiary status.**

|  |  |
|--|--|
## Detailed Single Year Tables

- Individual Provisions
- Level of Monthly Benefits

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						B3.10: Beginning with those newly eligible for OASDI benefits in 2030, gradually increase the first PIA bend point in each year so that it is 15 percent higher for those newly eligible in 2044 and later.**

### Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program

### Summarized Estimates
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION

File Name: 07a0445n.06

Filed: June 25, 2007

No. 06-4314

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

PATRICK G. ZBUKA, SR., 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

MARATHON ASHLAND 

PETROLEUM, LLC,

Defendant-Appellee.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED

STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

OPINION

Before: GILMAN, GIBBONS, and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM. Patrick G. Zbuka, Sr. had been an employee of Marathon Ashland

Petroleum, LLC or its predecessor since 1979. In June of 2004, following two costly mishaps

involving Zbuka, Marathon gave him the choice of either retiring or being terminated. He chose to

retire. Thereafter, Zbuka filed an action in federal district court alleging that Marathon violated

§ 510 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) by interfering with his right to

continue earning benefits under Marathon’s employee pension plan. Zbuka also argued that

Marathon’s offer to permit him to retire instead of being terminated violated § 510 by cutting off his

right under the collective bargaining agreement to grieve his termination. The district court granted

Marathon’s motion for summary judgment, and Zbuka timely appealed.
No. 06-4314

Zbuka v. Marathon

- 2 -

After carefully considering the record on appeal, the briefs of the parties, and the applicable

law, and having had the benefit of oral argument, we agree with the district court’s grant of summary

judgment in favor of Marathon. To the extent Zbuka claims that his termination violated § 510

because it interfered with his right to continue accruing benefits under the Plan, the district court

carefully and thoroughly explained why this argument fails. A detailed written opinion by us

covering the same ground would therefore be unduly duplicative. The judgment rendered on that

issue by the Honorable James G. Carr, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Ohio, is accordingly affirmed on the basis of the reasoning set forth in his

Opinion dated August 25, 2006. 

Judge Carr also held that the court lacked jurisdiction over Zbuka’s claim regarding his

grievance rights. We decline to reach this issue because we conclude that Zbuka’s complaint raised

no such stand-alone claim. Instead, Zbuka alleged at most that Marathon’s interference with his

grievance rights violated § 510 of ERISA. The crux of this claim is that, had Zbuka successfully

grieved his termination instead of being allegedly lured into retirement by Marathon, he could have

continued working and accruing benefits. This argument thus boils down to nothing more than an

attenuated version of Zbuka’s initial claim, which the district court properly rejected. In sum, any

alleged interference with Zbuka’s right to grieve his termination does not amount to an interference

with his rights under the Plan and therefore fails to state a valid claim under § 510. 

For all of the reasons set forth above, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Level of Monthly Benefits (PIA) | Description of Proposed Provision:      For each year from 2009-2039, multiply the 32 and 15 percent formula factors by 0.987, reducing the factors to 21 percent and 10 percent respectively, for new eligibles in 2039 and later |
|---------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2008 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified July 16, 2008 |
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CHICAGO
TITLE CORPORATION'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND
THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS
QUALIFED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERANCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>


<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>            SEP-30-1999

<EXCHANGE-RATE>                          0
[DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE]             1,096,620
[DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE]                    0
[DEBT-MARKET-VALUE]                      0
[EQUITIES]                          31,593
[MORTGAGE]                               0
[REAL-ESTATE]                            0
[TOTAL-INVEST]                   1,128,213
<CASH>                             216,391
[RECOVER-REINSURE]                       0
[DEFERRED-ACQUISITION]                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   2,017,869
[POLICY-LOSSES]                    656,220
[UNEARNED-PREMIUMS]                      0
[POLICY-OTHER]                           0
[POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS]                    0
[NOTES-PAYABLE]                     21,437
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<COMMON>                            21,833
<OTHER-SE>                         474,407
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     2,017,869
[PREMIUMS]                       1,489,468
[INVESTMENT-INCOME]                 48,988
[INVESTMENT-GAINS]                   1,261
[OTHER-INCOME]                           0
[BENEFITS]                          89,722
[UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION]              0
[UNDERWRITING-OTHER]             1,329,507
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    120,488
<INCOME-TAX>                        42,034
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 78,454
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                        78,454
<EPS-BASIC>                         3.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                         3.60
[RESERVE-OPEN]                           0
[PROVISION-CURRENT]                      0
[PROVISION-PRIOR]                        0
[PAYMENTS-CURRENT]                       0
[PAYMENTS-PRIOR]                         0
[RESERVE-CLOSE]                          0
[CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY]                  0

</TABLE


</TABLE>
#### EMMA ANDREWS, Widow; LEWIS ANDREWS, Deceased, Employee, v. TOWN OF PRINCEVILLE, Employer, Non-Insurer.

(Filed 20 March, 1957.)

Appeal by defendant from *Moore (Clifton L.), J.,*November Term, 1956, of Edgecombe.

Proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation Act for compensation claimed by the widow of Lewis Andrews, deceased policeman of the Town of Princeville. The Industrial Commission, on findings of hearing Commissioner Ransdell that the deceased came to his death as a result of an injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment as policeman, awarded' compensation. The defendant appealed to the Superior Court. There all exceptions and assignments of error were overruled and judgment was entered affirming the opinion and award of the Commission. From the judgment so entered, the defendant appeals.

*Fountain, Fountain, Biidgers & Horton for plaintiff.*

*Weeks & Muse for defendant.*

PER Curiam.

This appeal presents no new question of law requiring discussion. A careful examination of the record discloses that the findings of fact made by the hearing Commissioner, affirmed on appeal by the Full Commission, support the award. The assignments of error, when tested by settled principles of law, reveal no error. The judgment of the Superior Court will be upheld.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 4 (Friday, January 6, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 2159]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-339]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Civil and Mechanical Systems; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Civil and Mechanical Systems 
(#1205).
    Dates & Times: January 26 & 27, 1995; 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Place: NSF, Room 530/580, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA.
    Contact: Dr. Oscar W. Dillon/Dr. William A. Spitzig, Program 
Directors, Room 545, NSF.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning support for research proposals submitted to the NSF for 
financial support.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information, financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals.
    These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: January 3, 1995.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-339 Filed 1-5-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
#### Lewis N. Ireland, Respondent, v. Cornelia T. Davenport, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

Opinion by

Bockes, J.
Exhibit 23.1

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Data Systems and Software, Inc.:

We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  registration  statements
(Nos.  33-88442,  33-99196,  33-94974,  333-65799,   333-36159,  333-82418,  and
333-82416)  on  Form  S-8  and  the  registration  statements  (Nos.  333-90017,
333-76614,  333-92174 and  333-102334) on Form S-3 of Data Systems and Software,
Inc. of our report dated March 7, 2003, except as to the first paragraph of Note
4 and the second and third sentences of the third paragraph of Note 10(b), which
are as of April 10, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Data
Systems and Software,  Inc. and  subsidiaries  as of December 31, 2002,  and the
related consolidated  statements of operations,  changes in shareholders' equity
and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year  period ended  December 31,
2002,  which report  appears in the December 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K
of Data Systems and  Software,  Inc. Our report  refers to changes in accounting
for purchase method business combinations  completed after June 30, 2001 and for
goodwill and intangible assets beginning January 1, 2002.

/s/ KPMG LLP


Short Hills, New Jersey
March 31, 2004
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 246 (Friday, December 22, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 66546]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31191]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. ER96-203-000]

Multi-Energies U.S.A. Inc.; Notice of Issuance of Order

December 15, 1995.
    On October 31, 1995, Multi-Energies U.S.A. Inc. (MEI) submitted for 
filing a rate schedule under which MEI will engage in wholesale 
electric power and energy transactions as a marketer. MEI also 
requested waiver of various Commission regulations. In particular, MEI 
requested that the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 
34 of all future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability 
by MEI.
    On December 8, 1995, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Applications, Office of Electric Power Regulation, granted 
requests for blanket approval under Part 34, subject to the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by MEI should file a motion to intervene or 
protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 
of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, MEI is authorized 
to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as a 
guarantor, endorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security of 
another person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for some 
lawful object within the corporate purposes of the applicant, and 
compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or 
appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of MEI's issuances of securities or assumptions of 
liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is January 8, 1996.
    Copies of the full text of the order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-31191 Filed 12-21-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
## Summary Measures and Graphs

- Individual Provisions
- Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable)

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						E3.9: Beginning in 2031, apply 2 percent payroll tax rate on earnings over the wage-indexed equivalent of $200,000 in 2017 (about $348,300 in 2031), with the threshold wage-indexed after 2031. Do not provide benefit credit for additional earnings taxed.**

|  |  |
|--|--|
## Detailed Single Year Tables

- Individual Provisions
- Level of Monthly Benefits

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						B6.2: Provide the same dollar amount increase to the monthly benefit amount (MBA) of any beneficiary who is 85 or older at the beginning of 2024 or who reaches their 85th birthday after the beginning of 2024. The dollar amount of increase equals 5 percent of the average retired-worker MBA in the prior year.**

### Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program

### Summarized Estimates
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 9, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 6875]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02537]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Human Genome Research Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Inherited Disease Research Access 
Committee.
    Date: March 4, 2016.
    Time: 11:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Suite 3049, 5635 Fishers 
Lane, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Barbara J Thomas, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 2218, MSC 7890, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-435-0603, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7311071b1c1e1200331000015d1d1a1b5d141c05"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dbb9afb3b4b6baa89bb8a8a9f5b5b2b3f5bcb4ad">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human 
Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 4, 2016.
Sylvia Neal,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-02537 Filed 2-8-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                Exhibit 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


Board of Directors and Stockholders
of Cayenne Software, Inc.

        We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements of Cayenne Software, Inc. (formerly Bachman Information Systems,
Inc.) on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-87314, 33-53298, 33-48766, 33-71964 and
333-12139) and Form S-3 (File Nos. 33-99956 and 33-89940) of our report, which
included an explanatory paragraph about the merger of Cayenne Software, Inc. and
Cadre Technologies Inc. which has been accounted for as a pooling of interests,
dated February 25, 1997, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements
of Cayenne Software, Inc. as of December 31, 1996 and June 30, 1996, and for the
six month period ended December 31, 1996 and the year ended June 30, 1996, which
report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



Boston, Massachusetts                   COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
March 28, 1997