alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Cost-of-Living Adjustment | Description of Proposed Provision:      Beginning December 2009, use the superlative (or chained) CPI for COLAs, estimated to reduce the COLA by 0.3 percentage points |
|---------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                           |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2008 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified July 16, 2008 |
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 249 (Thursday, December 28, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67152-67153]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31357]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application To Withdraw From Listing 
and Registration; (Excel Industries, Inc., Common Stock, No Par Value) 
File No. 1-8684

December 20, 1995.
    Excel Industries, Inc. (``Company'') has filed an application with 
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to 
Section 12(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') and Rule 
12d2-2(d) promulgated thereunder, to withdraw the above specified 
security (``Security'') from listing and registration on the American 
Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Amex'').
    The reasons alleged for striking the Security from listing and 
registration include the following:
    According to the Company, trading in the Security on the New York 
Stock Exchange, Inc. commenced at the opening of business on December 
12, 1995 and, concurrently therewith, trading on the Amex was 
suspended. At its October 19, 1995 meeting, the Company's Board of 
Directors considered the direct and indirect costs and expenses 
attendant with maintaining a dual listing of the Security. The Board 
determined that there was no particular advantage in the 

[[Page 67153]]
dual trading of the Security and that a dual listing would fragment the 
market for the Security.
    Any interested person may, on or before January 10, 1996, submit by 
letter to the Secretary of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 
Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, facts bearing upon whether 
the application has been made in accordance with the rules of the Amex 
and what terms, if any, should be imposed by the Commission for the 
protection of investors. The Commission, based on the information 
submitted to it, will issue an order granting the application after the 
date mentioned above, unless the Commission determines to order a 
hearing on the matter.
    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant 
to delegated authority.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-31357 Filed 12-27-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001059083
<NAME> NATIONWIDE CREDIT, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           5,711
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,401
<ALLOWANCES>                                       498
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,998
<PP&E>                                          32,022
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,933
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 151,637
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,646
<BONDS>                                        100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,738)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   151,637
<SALES>                                         98,673
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                98,673
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                98,412
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,791
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,530)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,530)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,530)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### ROY M. BANKS and Wife, LIZZIE M. BANKS, v. J. PAUL SHAW.

(Filed 26 February, 1947.)

Heeds § 3—

When it is properly made to appear that the notary took the acknowledgment of grantors and the private examination of the wife, but inadvertently omitted the name of the husband from his certificate, the certificate can be amended subsequently to speak the truth, no rights of creditors or third parties being involved.

Appeal by defendant from *Thompson, J.,*at October Term, 1946, of Wake.

Affirmed.

*J.-M. Broughton and C. Woodrow Teague for*plaintiffs, *appellees.*

*Wilson & Biclcett for defendant, appellant.*

DeviN, J.

The purpose of the action is to determine the title to land, the subject of a contract to convey. The defect complained of is that plaintiffs’ title is derived under foreclosure of a deed of trust from T. A. Whitaker and wife, and that this deed of trust duly executed, probated and registered, showed notarial acknowledgment only by the wife. It was properly made to appear and not controverted that the notary took the acknowledgment of the grantors and the private examination of the wife, but inadvertently omitted the name of the husband from his certificate. Subsequent to the foreclosure the notary amended his certificate to speak the truth, attached it to the deed of trust, and the deed of trust with amended certificate in due form was again registered. No rights of third parties or creditors have intervened.

*173It appears that the deed of trust was properly executed and acknowledged. Hence the omission in the notary’s certificate was a matter of proof. The certificate could be amended subsequently to speak the truth, no rights of creditors or third parties being involved. *Frisbee v. Cole,*179 N. C., 469, 102 S. E., 890. In *Wynne v. Small,*102 N. C., 133, 8 S. E., 912, it was said: “If the records and *quasi*records omit to speak the truth, they should be corrected when they fail to do so, that they may possess, as they import, absolute verity in all their recitals.”

The court below properly held that the plaintiffs’ title was good, and that defendant should be required to accept deed for the land in accordance with the terms of the contract.

Judgment affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 28 (Friday, February 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7946]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3394]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
[OMB Control No. 9000-0094]


Clearance Request for Debarment and Suspension

AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DOD), General Services Administration 
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Notice of request for an extension to an existing OMB clearance 
(9000-0094).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 
(44 U.S.C. 3501), the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Secretariat 
has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request to 
review and approve an extension of a currently approved information 
collection requirement concerning Debarment and Suspension.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Fayson, Office of Federal 
Acquisition Policy, GSA (202) 501-4755.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Purpose

    The FAR requires contracts to be awarded to only those contractors 
determined to be responsible. Instances where a firm or its principals 
have been indicted, convicted, suspended, proposed for debarment, 
debarred, or had a contract terminated for default are critical factors 
to be considered by the contracting officer in making a responsibility 
determination. This certification would require the disclosure of this 
information.

B. Annual Reporting Burden

    Public reporting burden for this collection of information is 
estimated to average 30 minutes per subcontractor and 5 minutes per 
prime contractor per response, including the time for reviewing 
instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and 
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the 
collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate 
or any other aspect of this collection of information, including 
suggestions for reducing this burden, to General Services 
Administration, FAR Secretariat, 18th F Streets, NW., Room 4037, 
Washington, DC 20405, and to the FAR Desk Officer, Office of 
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 
Washington DC 20503.
    The annual reporting burden is estimated as follows: Respondents, 
1,244,301; responses per respondent, 1; total annual responses, 
1,244,301; preparation hours per response, 30 min. sub., 5 min. prime; 
and total response burden hours, 103,942.

OBTAINING COPIES OF PROPOSALS: Requester may obtain copies of OMB 
applications or justifications from the General Services 
Administration, FAR Secretariat (VRS), Room 4037, Washington, DC 20405, 
telephone (202) 501-4755. Please cite OMB Control No. 9000-0094, 
Debarment and Suspension, in all correspondence.

    Dated: February 6, 199.
Beverly Fayson,
FAR Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 95-3394 Filed 2-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-34-M
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NASB Financial, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Rhonda Nyhus, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.


February 14, 2005           By:  /s/ Rhonda Nyhus
                                 Rhonda Nyhus
                                 Vice President and Treasurer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to NASB Financial, Inc. and will be retained by NASB
Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.



This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein , and not for
any other purpose.

<Page>
Order filed February 19, 2015 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00765-CV

____________

ALAVOOR VASUDEVAN, Appellant

V.

DEEPA VASUDEVAN, Appellee

On Appeal from the 300th District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 63935

ORDER

On January 27, 2015, appellant filed a brief that is not in compliance with 

the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. In particular, appellant has failed to 

provide adequate citations to the record and to authority. Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(f), 

(h).

Accordingly, we order appellant’s brief filed January 27, 2015, stricken. 

Appellant is ordered to file a brief that complies with the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure within ten (10) days of the date of this order. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1. 
If appellant files another brief that does not comply with Rule 38, the Court 

may strike the brief, prohibit appellant from filing another, and proceed as if 

appellant had failed to file a brief. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.9(a). Pursuant to Texas 

Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a), where an appellant has failed to file a brief, 

we may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. If appellant fails to timely file 

a brief in accordance with Rule 38, the appeal will be dismissed for want of 

prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jamison, Busby and Brown.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3625 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to temporarily reinstate the 

employee retention credit for employers subject to closure due to COVID– 

19. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 10, 2022 

Ms. HASSAN (for herself, Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina, Mr. WARNER, Mrs. 

CAPITO, and Mr. CARDIN) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to temporarily 

reinstate the employee retention credit for employers subject to closure due to COVID–19. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Employee Retention 

5 Tax Credit Reinstatement Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3625 IS

1 SEC. 2. TEMPORARY REINSTATEMENT OF EMPLOYEE RE2 TENTION CREDIT FOR EMPLOYERS SUBJECT 

3 TO CLOSURE DUE TO COVID–19. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3134 of the Internal Rev5 enue Code of 1986 (as amended by section 80604 of the 

6 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act) is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (c)(5), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

8 the end of subparagraph (A), by striking the period 

9 at the end of subparagraph (B) and inserting ‘‘, 

10 and’’, and by adding at the end the following new 

11 subparagraph: 

12 ‘‘(C) which, with respect to such calendar 

13 quarter, is not described in subclause (I) or (II) 

14 of paragraph (2)(A)(ii).’’, and 

15 (2) in subsection (n), by striking ‘‘October 1, 

16 2021 (or, in the case of wages paid an eligible em17 ployer which is a recovery startup business, January 

18 1, 2022)’’ and inserting ‘‘January 1, 2022’’. 

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

20 this section shall apply to calendar quarters beginning 

21 after September 30, 2021. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 35.2
                                  ------------

                             WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK

                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

                         ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

      Re: The  servicing  agreement  dated as of October 1, 2006 (as  amended,
the "Agreement"), between Washington Mutual Bank as Servicer and Countrywide
Home Loans, Inc. as Owner, with respect to CWMBS 2007-J1 (the
"Securitization").

      I, H. John Berens, a Senior Vice President of Washington Mutual Bank (the
"Servicer"), certify to the Owner, the Depositor and the Master Servicer under
the Securitization, the following for the 2007 fiscal year (the "Relevant Year):

      1. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the Relevant Year and
of performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

      2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material
respects throughout the Relevant Year.

Dated as of March 1, 2008

                                                /s/ H. John Berens
                                                ------------------------------
                                                Name:  H. John Berens
                                                Title:  Senior Vice President
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and GraphsUpdated May 3, 2006   |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|

| Level of OASDI Contribution and Benefit Base | Description of Proposed Provision:      Beginning in 2006, make all earnings subject to the payroll tax and credit them for benefit purposes |
|----------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                              |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2005 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map |
Order entered September 6 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 19 - 00853 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF S .L.M., A.L.M., AND H .P.M., CHILDREN On Appeal from the 417th Judici al District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 417 - 54002 - 2014



### O RDER Befo re the Court is court reporter Kathy Bounds’ September 3, 2019 letter request for an extension of time to file the record

. We GRANT the request and ORDER the reporter’ s record be filed no later than October 3, 2019.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 32 (Thursday, February 16, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9050]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3913]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decrees Pursuant to the Clean Air 
Act

    Consistent with Departmental policy, 28 CFR Sec. 50.07, notice is 
hereby given that two proposed consent decrees in United States v. 
Consolidation Edison Co. and John's Insulation, Inc., Civil Action No. 
94 Civ. 1538 (LAP), were lodged on January 24, 1995 with the United 
States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Defendant 
Consolidation Edison is the owner of the Waterside Generating Station 
in New York, New York and contracted with John's Insulation, Inc. to 
remove Asbestos containing material from that station. The asbestos 
containing material was removed, stored, and disposed of in violation 
of the National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants for 
asbestos.
    Under the terms of the proposed decree, Consolidation Edison will 
pay the United States the sum of $100,000 within 14 days of the entry 
of the decree between the United States and Consolidation Edison and 
John's Insulation will pay the United States the sum of $42,500 in 
installments as follows: $15,000 within 7 days of the entry of the 
decree between the United States and John's Insulation, $12,500 within 
97 days of entry, and $12,500 within 187 days of entry. John's 
Insulation Inc. will also pay interest on the amount then due at the 
time of the second and third installment payments.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed consent decrees. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20530, and should refer to United 
States v. Consolidation Edison Co. and John's Insulation Inc., D.J. 
reference #90-5-2-1-1136A.
    The proposed consent decrees may be examined at the Office of the 
United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, 100 
Church Street, 19th Floor, New York, New York; the Region II Office of 
the Environmental Protection Agency, 26 Federal Plaza, New York, New 
York; and at the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street NW., 4th Floor, 
Washington, DC 20005, (202) 624-0892. A copy of the two proposed 
consent decrees may be obtained in person or by mail from the Consent 
Decree Library 1120 G Street NW. 4th Floor, Washington, DC. In 
requesting a copy, please enclose a check in the amount of $6.00 (25 
cents per page reproduction costs), payable to the Consent Decree 
Library.
Bruce Gelber,
Acting Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 95-3913 Filed 2-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Richard A. Waldron, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                                                     
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: March 13, 2008 |  |  |  | /S/    RICHARD A. WALDRON                           
|                     |  |  |  | Richard A. Waldron                                  
|                     |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be
retained by SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.