alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

   
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
 
                      FISHER SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL INC.
                           WORLDWIDE SUBSIDIARY LIST
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                    Percentage       State/Country
                                                                                     Ownership       Incorporation
                                                                                   -------------  -------------------
<S>                                                                                <C>            <C>
Fisher Scientific Company L.L.C.                                                           100               Delaware
  Fisher Scientific Limited                                                                100                 Canada
Fisher Hamilton Inc.                                                                       100               Delaware
Fisher Scientific GmbH                                                                     100                Germany
  Kuhn + Bayer GmbH                                                                        100                Germany
Fisher Scientific of the Netherlands B.V.                                                  100            Netherlands
  Fisher Scientific B.V.                                                                   100            Netherlands
Fisher Scientific Worldwide Inc.                                                           100               Delaware
  Acros Organics N.V.                                                                      100                Belgium
    Resco Trade N.V.                                                                       100                Belgium
  Fisher Chimica N.V.                                                                      100                Belgium
  Fisher Scientific Holding Company                                                        100               Delaware
    Fisher Scientific Holding U.K., Limited                                                100         United Kingdom
    Fisher Scientific U.K., Limited                                                        100         United Kingdom
  Orme Scientific Limited                                                                  100         United Kingdom
  Fisher Scientific Holdings France S.A.                                                   100                 France
    Fisher Scientific S.A.                                                                 100                 France
Fisher Technology Group Inc.                                                               100               Delaware
Strategic Procurement Services Holdings Inc.                                               100               Delaware
</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES -OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Belden & Blake Corporation (the Company) on Form
10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated
below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the knowledge of the undersigned:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: August 2, 2005

/s/ James A. Winne IIIJames A. Winne III, Chief Executive Officer andChairman of the Board of Directors This certification
accompanies the Form 10-K/A and shall not be treated as having been filed as part
of the Form 10-K/A.
Not for P ubl ication in West's Fe deral Reporter



# U nit edStates C ou rt o f App eal s

For th e Firs t C ircu it

No. 10-1165 UNITED STATES, Appellee,

v . ESTEBAN RIVERA-LEBRON, a/k/a Junito,

Defendant, Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Carmen Consuelo Cerezo, U.S. District Judge]

Before Boudin, Howard and Thompson, Circuit Judges.

Esteban Rivera-Lebron on brief pro se. Nelson Pérez-Sosa, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Julia M.Meconiates, Assistant U.S. Attorney,and Rosa Emilia RodriguezVelez, United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.

February 28, 2011-2- Per Curiam . After a thorough review of the record and ofthe parties' submissions, we affirm. Appellant Esteban RiveraLebron ("Rivera") has waived his right to appeal the denial of his motion for a writ of audita querela because he failed to file an objection to the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation. See United S t a t e s v . L u g o G u e r r e r o , 5 2 4 F . 3 d5 , 1 4 ( 1 s t C i r . 2 008). That Report and Recommendation properly advised Rivera that a failure to object would amount to a waiver. See United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986).

Furthermore, we see no plain error that would cause us to overlook the waiver. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 155 (1985). "The armamentarium of common-law writs [is] available only to fill whatever interstices exist in the post-conviction remedial scheme made available to federal prisoners by way of [28 U.S.C. §] 2255." Trenkler v. United States, 536 F.3d 85, 97 (1st Cir. 2008). Where a prisoner has filed a motion for relief under one of the common law writs , t h e court must examine the substance of the motion to determine whether the claim is one that would be cognizable under section 2255. If so, the motion must satisfy the gate-keeping provisions of section 2255(h) in order for the motion to proceed. Id. Rivera's motion clearly falls within th e purview of section 2255, as he challenges the validity of his sentence under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). The motion fails to-3-

meet the gate-keeping requirements of section 2 2 55. Rivera has already filed a first section 2255 motion, so the instant filing was, in essence, a second or successive section 2255 motion, and Rivera failed to request p e rmission first from this court to proceed with his second or successive motion as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h). Even if he had done so, the request would have been denied because the motion does not rely upon a new rule of constitutional law made retroactive to cases on collateral review by th e S u p r e m e C o u r t o r u p o n n e w l y d i s c o v e r e d e v i d e n c e . See 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h)(1) & (2).

Affirmed. See 1st Cir. R. 27.0(c).
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 28 (Friday, February 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7960]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3321]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP95-192-000]


Gas Transport, Inc.; Notice of Application

February 6, 1995.
    Take notice that on February 1, 1995, Gas Transport, Inc. (Gas 
Transport), 109 N. Broad Street, Lancaster, OH 43130 filed in Docket 
No. CP95-192-000 an application pursuant to Section 7(b) of the Natural 
Gas Act for permission and approval to abandon a gas transportation and 
exchange service between Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation 
(Columbia), all as more fully set forth in the application on file with 
the Commission and open to public inspection.
    Specifically, Gas Transport proposes to abandon its Rate Schedule 
X-2, which represents the transportation and exchange service between 
Columbia. Gas Transport and Columbia have not transported volumes under 
this agreement since July 1991, as the exchange services are no longer 
utilized or needed by the parties.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with 
reference to said application should on or before February 27, 1995, 
file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 
20426, a motion to intervene or a protest in accordance with the 
requirements of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 
CFR 385.214 or 385.211) and the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act 
(18 CFR 157.10). All protests filed with the Commission will be 
considered by it in determining the appropriate action to be taken but 
will not serve to make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party to a proceeding or to participate as a 
party in any hearing therein must file a motion to intervene in 
accordance with the Commission's Rules.
    Take further notice that, pursuant to the authority contained in 
and subject to the jurisdiction conferred upon the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission by Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, a hearing will be 
held without further notice before the Commission or its designee on 
this application if no motion to intervene is filed within the time 
required herein, if the Commission on its own review of the matter 
finds that permission and approval for the proposed abandonment are 
required by the public convenience and necessity. If a motion for leave 
to intervene is timely filed, or if the Commission on its own motion 
believes that a formal hearing is required, further notice of such 
hearing will be duly given.
    Under the procedure herein provided for, unless otherwise advised, 
it will be unnecessary for Applicant to appear or be represented at the 
hearing.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-3321 Filed 2-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7597-7598]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3243]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-35331; File No. 265-19]


Consumer Affairs Advisory Committee; Meeting

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission.

ACTION: Notice of meeting of the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') Consumer Affairs Advisory Committee (``Committee'').

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is to give notice that the Securities and Exchange 
Commission Consumer Affairs Advisory Committee will meet on February 
21, 1995, in Room 1C30 at the Commission's main offices, 450 Fifth 
Street, NW., Washington, DC, beginning at 9 a.m. The meeting will be 
open to the public. This notice also serves to invite the public to 
submit written comments to the Committee.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be submitted in triplicate and 
should refer to File No. 265-19. Comments should be submitted to 
Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 
Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy M. Smith, Director, Office of 
Consumer Affairs, (202) 942-7040; Securities and Exchange Commission, 
450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with Section 10(a) of the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app 10a, the Securities and 
Exchange Commission Consumer [[Page 7598]] Advisory Committee hereby 
gives notice that it will meet on February 21, 1995, in Room 1C30 at 
the Commission's main offices, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC, 
beginning at 9 a.m. The meeting will be open to the public.
    The Committee's responsibilities include assisting the Commission 
in identifying investor problems and being more responsible to their 
needs. The Committee will explore fundamental issues of concern to 
investors, including matters currently under consideration by the SEC 
and topics of emerging concern to investors and the financial services 
industry.
    The purpose of this meeting will be to consider disclosure reform 
proposals; municipal securities; litigation reform; broker-dealer sales 
practices; and investor educational projects to be undertaken by the 
Office of Consumer Affairs.

    Dated: February 3, 1995.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-3243 Filed 2-6-95; 1:13 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
Supreme Court of Florida

____________

No. SC18-1531

____________

MARK C. JACKSON,

Petitioner,

vs.

STATE OF FLORIDA, et al.,

Respondents.

June 13, 2019

PER CURIAM.

Mark C. Jackson—a pro se litigant—filed a petition to invoke this Court’s 

discretionary jurisdiction. By order dated April 11, 2019, we denied Jackson’s 

petition but expressly reserved jurisdiction to pursue possible sanctions against 

him. Jackson v. State, No. SC18-1531, 2019 WL 1575238 (Fla. Apr. 11, 2019);

see Fla. R. App. P. 9.410(a) (Sanctions; Court’s Motion).

While his case was pending in this Court, Jackson filed a litany of motions 

that were frivolous, devoid of merit, or sought relief previously denied in case 

numbers SC12-367 and SC17-1628. Because of his filing history, Jackson was 

ordered to show cause why he should not be prohibited from submitting further pro 
- 2 -

se documents in this Court. See State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999) 

(requiring that a litigant be provided notice and an opportunity to respond before 

sanctions are imposed). Jackson has now filed a response to the Court’s order.

We conclude that Jackson has failed to show cause why he should not be 

sanctioned. Through his persistent filing of nonmeritorious requests for relief, 

Jackson has abused the judicial process. Jackson’s response neglected to provide 

any justification for this abuse or to express remorse for his repeated misuse of the

Court’s resources. We are therefore convinced that, if not restrained, Jackson will 

continue to burden this Court with frivolous and meritless filings, diverting finite 

judicial resources from other litigants. See Pettway v. McNeil, 987 So. 2d 20, 22 

(Fla. 2008).

Accordingly, the Clerk of this Court is hereby directed to reject any future 

pleadings, petitions, motions, documents, letters, or other requests for relief 

submitted by Mark C. Jackson, unless such filings are signed by a member in good 

standing of The Florida Bar.1

 Counsel may file on Jackson’s behalf if counsel 

determines that the proceeding may have merit and can be brought in good faith.

 

1. In recent years, we have imposed comparable sanctions on other pro se 

litigants who have exhibited their disregard for abusing the scarce judicial 

resources of this Court. See, e.g., Wetzel v. Travelers Cos., Inc., 267 So. 3d 978 

(Fla. 2019); Shirah v. State, 257 So. 3d 23 (Fla. 2018); Woodson v. State, 242 So. 

3d 315 (Fla. 2018); Rivas v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon, 239 So. 3d 614 (Fla. 2018).
- 3 -

No motion for rehearing or clarification will be entertained by the Court.

It is so ordered.

CANADY, C.J., and POLSTON, LABARGA, LAWSON, LAGOA, LUCK, and 

MUÑIZ, JJ., concur. 

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal –

Constitutional Construction 

First District - Case No. 1D18-242

(Bradford County)

Mark C. Jackson, pro se, Starke, Florida, 

for Petitioner 

No appearance for Respondent
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, John E. Bailye, certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/Aof Dendrite International, Inc.;

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;

Date: April 30, 2007

|        | By:    | /s/ JOHN E. BAILYE                   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  | John E. Bailye                       |
|   | Title: | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 250 (Friday, December 29, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 67330]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31524]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[CGD 05-95-086]


Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; New Year's Eve 
Fireworks; Delaware River, Philadelphia, PA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of implementation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice implements 33 CFR 100.509 for the New Year's Eve 
Fireworks Display. The display will be launched from barges anchored 
off Penns Landing, Delaware River, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on 
December 31, 1995. The regulations in 33 CFR 100.509 are needed to 
control vessel traffic in the immediate vicinity of the event due to 
the confined nature of the waterway and expected spectator craft 
congestion during the event. The regulations restrict general 
navigation in the area for the safety of life and property on the 
navigable waters during the event.

EFFECTIVE DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 100.509 are effective from 
11 p.m., December 31, 1995 until 1:20 a.m., on January 1, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Stephen Phillips, Chief, Boating Affairs Branch, Boating Safety 
Division, Fifth Coast Guard District, 431 Crawford Street, Portsmouth, 
Virginia 23704-5004 (804) 398-6204, or Commander, Coast Guard Group 
Philadelphia (215) 271-4825.

    Drafting Information: The drafters of this notice are QM1 
Gregory C. Garrison, project officer, Boating Affairs Branch, 
Boating Safety Division, Fifth Coast Guard District, and CDR T.R. 
Cahill, project attorney, Fifth Coast Guard District Legal Staff.

Discussion of Regulation

    The Philadelphia Convention and Visitors Bureau submitted an 
application to hold a Neighbors in the New Year fireworks display. The 
display will be launched from barges anchored off Penns Landing, 
Delaware River, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Since many spectator 
vessels are expected to be in the area to watch the fireworks, the 
regulations in 33 CFR 100.509 are being implemented for this event. The 
fireworks will be launched from within the regulated area. The waterway 
will be closed during the display. Since the closure will not be for an 
extended period, commercial traffic should not be severely disrupted.

    Dated: December 18, 1995.
W.J. Ecker,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 95-31524 Filed 12-28-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-14-M
EXHIBIT 12.1







CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      302


THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






I,
      Federico Sada Gonzalez, certify that:




1.  I
      have
      reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Vitro, S.A. de C.V.;




2.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
      in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
      results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods
      presented in this report;




4.  The
      company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
      and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules
      13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:




(a)  designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
      and
      procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
      information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
      is
      made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
      in which this report is being prepared;




(b)  evaluated
      the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and
      presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
      this
      report based on such evaluation; and




(c)  disclosed
      in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial
      reporting that
      occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially
      affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal
      control over financial reporting; and




5.  The
      company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's
      auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of
      directors:




(a)  all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report
      financial information; and




(b)  any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial
      reporting.




Date:April 24, 2006
            /s/ Federico Sada
                GonzalezName:Federico
                Sada GonzalezTitle:President
                and Chief
              Executive Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NASB Financial, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Rhonda Nyhus, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.


May 14, 2004                By:  /s/ Rhonda Nyhus
                                 Rhonda Nyhus
                                 Vice President and Treasurer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to NASB Financial, Inc. and will be retained by NASB
Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.



This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein , and not for any
other purpose.

<Page>