alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 8414]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3627]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Importation of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Section 1008 of the Controlled Substances Import and 
Export Act (21 U.S.C. 958(i)), the Attorney General shall, prior to 
issuing a registration under this Section to a bulk manufacturer of a 
controlled substance in Schedule I or II and prior to issuing a 
regulation under Section 1002(a) authorizing the importation of such a 
substance, provide manufacturers holding registrations for the bulk 
manufacture of the substance an opportunity for a hearing.
    Therefore, in accordance with Section 1311.42 of Title 21, Code of 
Federal Regulations (CFR), notice is hereby given that on November 2, 
1994, Nycomed Inc., 33 Riverside Avenue, Rensselaer, New York 12144, 
made application to the Drug Enforcement Administration to be 
registered as an importer of Meperidine (9230), a basic class of 
controlled substance in Schedule II.
    Any manufacturer holding, or applying for, registration as a bulk 
manufacturer of this basic class of controlled substance may file 
written comments on or objections to the application described above 
and may, at the same time, file a written request for a hearing on such 
application in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.54 in such form as 
prescribed by 21 CFR 1316.47.
    Any such comments, objections, or requests for a hearing may be 
addressed to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion 
Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of 
Justice, Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register 
Representative (CCR), and must be filed no later than March 16, 1995.
    This procedure is to be conducted simultaneously with and 
independent of the procedures described in 21 CFR 1311.42 (b), (c), 
(d), (e), and (f). As noted in a previous notice at 40 FR 43745-46 
(September 23, 1975), all applicants for registration to import a basic 
class of any controlled substance in Schedule I or II are and will 
continue to be required to demonstrate to the Deputy Assistant 
Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement 
Administration that the requirements for such registration pursuant to 
21 U.S.C. 958(a), 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and 21 CFR 1311.42 (a), (b), (c), 
(d), (e), and (f) are satisfied.

    Dated: February 6, 1995.
Gene R. Haislip,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 95-3627 Filed 2-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
**EXHIBIT21**

**Subsidiariesof the Registrant**

 
| **Parent**                | **Subsidiary**                                                |   | **Percentage  of Ownership** |   | **State of Incorporation  or Organization** |   |
|---------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------|--------|
|                           |                                                          |        |                         |        |                                        |        |   |
| HF Financial Corp.        | Home Federal Savings Bank                                     |   | 100%                         |   | Delaware                                    |   |
|                      |                                                          |   |                         |   |                                        |   |
| HF Financial Corp.        | HomeFirst Mortgage Corp.                                      |   | 100%                         |   | South Dakota                                |   |
|                      |                                                          |   |                         |   |                                        |   |
| HF Financial Corp.        | HF Card Services L.L.C.                                       |   | 100%                         |   | South Dakota                                |   |
|                      |                                                          |   |                         |   |                                        |   |
| Home Federal Savings Bank | Hometown Insurors, Inc.                                       |   | 100%                         |   | South Dakota                                |   |
|                      |                                                          |   |                         |   |                                        |   |
| Home Federal Savings Bank | Mid-America Service Corporation                               |   | 100%                         |   | South Dakota                                |   |
|                      |                                                          |   |                         |   |                                        |   |
| Home Federal Savings Bank | PMD, Inc.                                                     |   | 100%                         |   | South Dakota                                |   |
|                      |                                                          |   |                         |   |                                        |   |
| HomeFirst Mortgage Corp.  | Mid America Capital Services, Inc.  d/b/a/Mid America Leasing |   | 100%                         |   | South Dakota                                |   |
|                           |                                                               |        |                              |        |                                             |        |  |

The financialstatements of HF Financial Corp. are consolidated with those of itssubsidiaries.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9700]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4171]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 95-021]


NASA Advisory Council (NAC), Aeronautics Advisory Committee, 
Subcommittee on Human Factors; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting change.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Federal Register CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 60 FR 3665, Notice 
Number 95-004, January 18, 1995.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED DATES AND ADDRESSES OF MEETING: February 22, 1995, 
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.; February 23, 1995, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.; and 
February 24, 1995 8:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. National Aeronautics and 
Space Administration, Langley Research Center, Building 1268A, Room 
2120, Hampton, VA 23681-0001.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING: Dates changed to March 29, 1995, March 30, 
1995, and March 31, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Gregory W. Condon, National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration, Ames Research Center, Moffett 
Field, CA 94035, 415/604-5567

    Dated: February 14, 1995.
Timothy M. Sullivan,
Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-4171 Filed 2-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 28 (Friday, February 10, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 8165]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3477]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 93-ANM-20]


Alteration of Jet Route J-171; CO

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; announcement of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On February 28, 1995, the new Denver International Airport is 
scheduled to open, replacing Stapleton International Airport. This 
action supports the new Denver International Airport airspace structure 
by altering Jet Route J-171 from Tobe, CO, to Hugo, CO. This airspace 
change was delayed previously pending the opening of the new Denver 
International Airport. This airspace reconfiguration coincides with the 
scheduled opening date of the new airport.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The final rule at 59 FR 1619, as postponed at 59 FR 
10744 and 59 FR 24915, is effective 0701 UTC, February 28, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Norman W. Thomas, Airspace and 
Obstruction Evaluation Branch (ATP-240), Airspace-Rules and 
Aeronautical Information Division, Air Traffic Rules and Procedures 
Service, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., 
Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-9230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 12, 1994, the Federal Aviation 
Administration (FAA) published a final rule altering Jet Route J-171 
from Tobe, CO, to Hugo, CO, to support the new Denver International 
Airport airspace reconfiguration.
    Most recently, the FAA delayed this rule indefinitely pending the 
official opening of the new Denver International Airport. The new 
airport is scheduled to open on February 28, 1995. This airspace 
reconfiguration coincides with the opening date of the new airport.
    Because the public needs to be made aware of the opening date 
immediately, notice and public procedure are impracticable and good 
cause exists for making this action effective in less than 30 days.
    In consideration of the foregoing, Airspace Docket No. 93-ANM-20 
altering Jet Route J-171 (59 FR 1619; January 12, 1994) as postponed at 
59 FR 10744 (March 8, 1994) and 59 FR 24915 (May 13, 1994) is effective 
February 28, 1995.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 8, 1995.
Harold W. Becker,
Manager, Airspace-Rules and Aeronautical Information Division.
[FR Doc. 95-3477 Filed 2-8-95; 11:42 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration # 14581 and # 14582]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration

# ACTION:

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Texas (FEMA-4245-DR), dated 12/24/2015.

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms, Tornadoes, Straight-line Winds, and Flooding.                    

*Incident Period:*                         10/22/2015 through 10/31/2015.                    

*Effective Date:*                         01/29/2016.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         02/22/2016.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         09/26/2016.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of TEXAS, dated 12/24/2015, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

*Primary Counties:*                     Smith.                

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59008)

James E. Rivera,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2016-02562 Filed 2-8-16; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NASB Financial, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, David H. Hancock, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.


February 14, 2005        By: /s/ David H. Hancock
                             David H. Hancock
                             Chairman and Chief
                               Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to NASB Financial, Inc. and will be retained by NASB
Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.


This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein , and not for
any other purpose.

<Page>
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Level of Monthly Benefits (PIA) | Description of Proposed Provision:      Progressive price indexing of PIA formula factors beginning with individuals newly eligible for OASI benefits in 2015.  Create new bend point at the 30th percentile of earners.  Maintain current-law benefits for earners at the 30th percentile and below and reduce upper 2 formula factors (32% and 15%) such that maximum worker benefit grows by inflation rather than the growth in average wages.  Disability benefits are not affected by the proposal.  Disabled worker beneficiaries, upon attaining normal retirement age, would be subject to a proportional reduction in benefits based on the worker's years of disability. |
|---------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2008 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified July 16, 2008 |
### Proposed Provision: C2.1. Increase the earliest eligibility age (EEA) by 2 months per year for those age 62 starting in 2025 and ending in 2042 (EEA reaches 65 for those age 62 in 2042).
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 28, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 128928 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 128928 COA: 252518 Oakland CC: 2003-188269-FC, ROBERT BABUR BASAT, 2003-188270-FC Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the May 10, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d0424 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2006

Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 32 (Thursday, February 16, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9030-9031]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3868]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Freight Forwarder License Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission applications for licenses as ocean 
freight forwarders pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 
(46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR part 510).
    Persons knowing of any reason why any of the following applicants 
should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Freight Forwarders, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573.

Oregon Pacific Hay Company, 720 NE Flanders Street, #200, Portland, 
OR 97232, Officers: George Joseph Spada, President; Marietta Lucia 
Spada, Vice President
Natural Freight, Ltd., 53 Park Place, Suite 1002, New York, NY 
10007, Officers: Willy Burkhardt, President; Alfons Strub, Exec. 
Vice President [[Page 9031]] 
J.F.A. Cargo Express Corporation, 505 West 211th Street, New York, 
NY 10034, Officers: Froilan Nunez, President; Federico Nunez, 
Secretary
Singh Universal Networks, Inc., 605 Country Club Drive, Unit H, 
Bensenville, IL 60106, Officers: Maninder Singh Birk, President; 
Harbinder Kaur Birk, Corporate Secretary.

    Dated: February 10, 1995.

    By the Federal Maritime Commission.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-3868 Filed 2-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
#### National Lumber Company *v.*Mehaffey, Appellant.

*Appeals*— Paper-books—Failure *to print record*— Quashing *appeal*— Me*chanic’s lien.*

An appeal from a judgment on a verdict on a scire facias sur mechanic’s lien, will be quashed, where it appears that the appellant, although having ample time, printed only a portion of the mechanic’s lien, and failed to print the evidence, the charge and exceptions, and also filed no specifications of error, or offered to file them until after the case was called for argument.

Argued April 18, 1906.

Appeal, No. 48, April T., 1906, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Westmoreland Co., Aug. T., 1903, No. 45, on verdict for plaintiff in case of National Lumber Co. v. Anna J. Mehaffey.

Before Rice, P. J., Orlady, Porter, Morrison and Henderson, JJ.

Appeal quashed.

Scire facias sur mechanic’s lien.

The opinion of the Superior Court states the case.

No errors were assigned.

*J. F. Dunlap*and *Elmer R.*Snyder, for appellant.

*J. S.*Moorhead, for appellee.

*545April 23, 1906:

Pee Curiam,

This was a scire facias upon a mechanic’s lien. The cause having been put at issue came on for trial and resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff. It appears by the docket entries that a motion for new trial was made by the defendant which was overruled; that subsequently a petition for rehearing was presented, which, “ after due consideration,” was refused; and that judgment having been duly entered upon the verdict, this appeal was taken in July, 19'05. It is thus seen that the appellant had ample time to prepare a paper-book in accordance with our rules. No reasonable excuse is offered for the failure to do so. The defects in it are not merely formal. The mechanic’s claim, except as partially recited in the writ, the evidence and the charge of the court are not printed. The record, as printed, fails to show that any ruling of the court was excepted to. It is stated in the history of the case that, before the jury was sworn, a motion was made to strike off the lien and dismiss the proceedings, but no record of such motion is printed, nolis the petition, if one was presented as the basis of the motion, printed. Finally, passing other minor defects in the paper-book, no specifications of error were filed or printed, or offered to be filed or printed, until after the appeal was called for argument and the motion to quash the appeal was made. Even in the absence of such motion, we would be constrained to quash it. No comment upon the manifest disregard of our rules is called for; it is apparent that the motion made by the appellant’s counsel, after the motion to quash, to continue the cause, in order to give him time to present a paper-book in accordance with our rules, must be refused.

The appeal is quashed at the appellant’s cost and the record remitted to the court below.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 6, 2020

No. 04-19-00795-CV

David RODRIGUEZ,

Appellant

v.

H-E-B, Jointly and Severally William Tate, Jointly and Severally and as employee of H-E-B 

L.P., Stephen Martinez Jointly and Severally and as employee of H-E-B L.P., Meredith Reid as 

employee of H-E-B L.P, Jointly and Severally, Debra Ann Godoy as employee of H-E-B L.P. et 

al.,

Appellees

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CI16263

Honorable Cynthia Marie Chapa, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On January 22, 2020, the court ordered appellant David Rodriguez to pay the filing fee 

for this appeal by February 6, 2020. On January 24, 2020, appellant filed a motion for rehearing 

and a motion for reconsideration en banc from that order. On February 3, 2020, appellant filed a 

“Motion for Reset or Extend of Time to Pay Filing Fee,” which asked the court to reset the 

deadline for the filing fee until after it disposed of his motion for rehearing.

On February 3, 2020, the court denied appellant’s motion for rehearing and his motion 

for reconsideration en banc. Appellant’s February 3, 2020 “Motion for Reset or Extend of Time 

to Pay Filing Fee” is therefore DENIED AS MOOT.

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 6th day of February, 2020.
___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

WAL-MART STORES TEXAS, L.L.C., 

d/b/a WAL-MART-SUPERCENTER,

 Appellant,

V.

SONIA DOZAL,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-13-00198-CV

Appeal from the

327th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2011-DCV-00932)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal and 

concludes the motion should be granted and the appeal should be dismissed, in accordance with 

the opinion of this Court. We therefore dismiss the appeal. Costs of the appeal are taxed against 

Appellant. See TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1(d). This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2014.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.