BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE FEDERAL 

OLD-AGE AND SURVIVORS INSURANCE AND 

FEDERAL DISABILITY INSURANCE TRUST FUNDS 

WASHINGTON, D.C., MAY 13, 2011 

The Honorable Joseph R. Biden, Jr. 

President of the Senate 

Washington, D.C. 20510 

Dear Mr. President: 

We are writing to notify you, per the requirements of section 709 of the Social Security 

Act, that the Federal Disability Insurance (DI) Trust Fund is projected to become 

inadequate within the next 10 years. As shown in the 2011 OASDI Trustees Report, which 

we are issuing today and a copy of which is attached, the assets of the DI Trust Fund are 

projected to fall below 20 percent of annual cost during 2016 based on our intermediate set 

of economic, demographic, and programmatic assumptions. Moreover, the assets of the DI 

Trust Fund are projected to become exhausted in 2018, if no action is taken. 

Background—Section 709 of the Social Security Act requires the Board of Trustees of the 

Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance and Disability Insurance Trust Funds (the 

Board) to submit a report to each House of the Congress when it determines that the 

balance ratio of a trust fund for any calendar year may become less than 20 percent. The 

balance ratio is the ratio of assets at the beginning of a year to the cost for that year.1

Section 709 further requires that the report include: 

 . . . recommendations for statutory adjustments affecting the receipts and 

disbursements of such Trust Fund necessary to maintain the balance ratio 

of such Trust Fund at not less than 20 percent, with due regard to the 

economic conditions which created such inadequacy in the balance ratio 

and the amount of time necessary to alleviate such inadequacy in a 

prudent manner. The report shall set forth specifically the extent to which 

benefits would have to be reduced, taxes . . . would have to be increased, 

or a combination thereof, in order to obtain the objectives referred to in 

the preceding sentence. 

The Disability Insurance Trust Fund—Each year, the Board prepares a report, 

commonly referred to as the Trustees Report, on the financial outlook for the Social 

Security trust funds. Estimates in the 2011 Trustees Report show that, although the OldAge and Survivors Insurance (OASI) Trust Fund and the theoretical combined OASI and 

Disability Insurance (DI) Trust Funds are adequately financed during the 10-year shortrange projection period under intermediate assumptions, the DI fund alone is not. 

 

1

 This ratio is also called a trust fund ratio in the 2011 OASDI Trustees Report. 
Under

Truste

Trust 

estima

ratios 

date o

The B

DI Tru

amoun

Maint

minim

below

revenu

increa

to coin

nomin

future

at leas

The ad

differ 

assets

r the interme

ees’ best esti

Fund are pro

ated to becom

for the comb

of trust fund 

Balance 

Board believe

ust Fund at t

nt of time ne

taining a Ba

mum annual 

w 20 percent 

ue, (2) cost r

ase and cost r

ncide with th

nal dollar am

e. Larger cha

st 20 percent

dditional pay

somewhat f

 (the numera

ediate assum

imate of futu

ojected to fa

me exhauste

bined OASI

exhaustion. 

ratios for the O

present l

es that repor

this time fulf

ecessary to a

alance Ratio

amounts of c

over the nex

reductions, a

reduction ar

he short-rang

mounts becom

anges would

t for the DI T

yroll tax rev

from the requ

ator of the ba

mptions of the

ure economic

all below 20 

ed in 2018. T

 and DI Trus

OASI and DI T

law under the I

2011 Truste

rting the exp

fills the statu

alleviate the 

o of at Leas

change nece

xt 10 years. T

and (3) a com

re shown for 

ge projection

me increasin

d be needed a

Trust Fund.

enue amoun

uired reducti

alance ratio)

e 2011 Trust

c and demog

percent of an

The figure be

st Funds and

Trust Funds, sep

Intermediate A

ees Report, 199

ected future 

utory require

inadequacy 

t 20 Percen

essary to kee

The amounts

mbination of

each year th

n period in th

ngly less mea

after 2020 in

nts required t

ions in cost. 

) but have lit

tees Report (

graphic trend

nnual cost d

elow shows t

d for each fu

parately and co

Assumptions of

90-2045 

decrease in 

ement to giv

in a prudent

nt—The follo

ep the DI bal

s of (1) addit

f equal amou

hrough 2020

the 2011 Tru

aningful for 

n order to ma

to meet the 2

Payroll tax

ttle immedia

(those repres

ds), the asset

during 2016 a

the estimate

und separatel

ombined, base

f the 

the balance 

ve due regard

t manner. 

owing table 

lance ratio fr

tional payro

unts of payro

0. This period

ustees Repor

years farthe

aintain a bal

20-percent m

revenue cha

ate effect on 

senting the 

ts of the DI 

and are 

ed balance 

ly up to the 

d on 

ratio for the

d to the 

shows the 

rom falling 

oll tax 

oll tax reven

d was chose

rt and becaus

r in the 

lance ratio o

minimum 

anges affect 

cost (the 

2 

e

nue 

en 

se 

f 
3 

denominator); benefit changes needed to reduce program cost affect both assets and cost 

simultaneously. Under the combined approach, roughly one-half of the amounts shown 

would be raised through additional payroll tax revenue and one-half would be 

implemented through cost reductions. 

Amounts required to prevent DI balance ratio from declining below 20 percent under the Intermediate 

Assumptions of the 2011 Trustees Report 

(In billions) 

Calendar 

year 

Additional 

payroll tax 

revenue only 

Cost reductionsa

only 

Total amounts of additional payroll tax 

revenue and cost reductionsa under a 

combined approach 

2016 $1.4 — $0.7 

2017 24.7 $21.3 23.0 

2018 24.2 24.2 24.2 

2019 25.0 25.0 25.0 

2020 26.5 25.9 26.2 

Total, 

2016-2020 101.6 96.5 99.0 a

Amounts shown for cost reductions through changes in benefits are net of partially offsetting estimated 

reductions that would occur automatically due to income taxes on Social Security benefits. 

A projected trust fund level of 20 percent of annual cost may be sufficient to enable the 

timely payment of benefits but does not provide an adequate reserve against adverse 

contingencies. A more stringent measure of trust fund strength is the test of short-range 

financial adequacy. As described in the 2011 Trustees Report, meeting this test requires 

that the estimated balance ratio remain at or above 100 percent if the current ratio is at least 

100 percent. If the current balance ratio is under 100 percent, then the projected ratio is 

required to reach 100 percent by the beginning of the sixth year and to remain at or over 

100 percent throughout the remainder of the 10-year short-range period. In addition, 

projected assets must be sufficient to pay all estimated costs over the entire 10-year period. 

The test is applied on the basis of the intermediate assumptions. Compliance with this test 

should be an important goal for any statutory adjustments designed to strengthen the 

financial condition of the DI Trust Fund. 

Recommendation—Based on the intermediate estimates in the 2011 Trustees Report, the 

assets of the DI Trust Fund would fall below 20 percent of annual cost during 2016 and 

would become exhausted in 2018 in the absence of corrective legislation. Legislative 

action should be taken to remedy the inadequate future assets of the DI Trust Fund. 

Since the inception of the DI Trust Fund, inadequate assets in either the OASI or the DI 

Trust Fund have at times been remedied by reallocating part of the existing payroll tax rate 

from the more adequately financed fund to the less adequately financed fund. This has 

provided additional revenue for the inadequate fund without requiring an increase in 

overall tax rates. Though this action would improve the finances of the DI Trust Fund, it 

would produce no net improvement for the combined OASI and DI Trust Funds. Such 

action was taken most recently in 1994, when the DI Trust Fund was projected to become