alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Greg Petersen, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Activant Solutions Inc.,
certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Activant Solutions Inc.;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this quarterly report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed undersupervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this quarterly report is being prepared;(b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during theregistrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:  (a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significantrole in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting. Date: February 10, 2005 /s/ GREG PETERSEN
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 14-1040V Filed: January 22, 2015
Not for Publication

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
ROBERTA LIVOLSI *
*
* Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; * Influenza Vaccine (“flu”); v. * Shoulder Injury Related to
* Vaccine Admi nistration (“SIRVA”); * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”)
SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, *
* Respondent. *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Ronald Homer, Conway, Homer & Chin-Cap lan, P.C., Boston, MA, for petitioner. Lindsay Corliss, U.S. D epartment of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

Vowell , Chief Special Master:

On October 27, 2014, Roberta Livolsi f iled a petition for co mpensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensat ion Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq

, 2 [the “Vaccine Act” or “Progr am”]. The petition alleges that as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccination on October 3, 2012, petitioner suffe red a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”). Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Offi ce of Special Masters.

On January 22, 2015, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) Report [“Respondent’s Report”], in which she concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case.

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, it will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' we bsite, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified mate rial fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Ac t will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2006).2 Respondent’s Report at 5. Specifically, respondent submits that “the injury to petitioner’s left shoulder was caused by the adm inistration of her Oc tober 3, 2012, flu vaccine and that petitioner’s left shoulder injury is not due to factor s unrelated” to her
vaccination. Id. Additionally, respondent indicated that petitioner’s injury has persisted for more than six months. Id.

In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, I find that petitioner is entitled to compensation.

s/Denise K. Vowell
Denise K. Vowell Chief Special Master
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Actuarial Publications | Summary of Provisions That Would Change the Social Security Program |
|------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Solvency Provisions | Description of Proposed Provisions:              Provisions Affecting Payroll Tax Rates |
|---------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of         the 2008 Trustees Report*

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified November 13, 2008 |
#### In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner; Harvey M. Eisenberg, Respondent.

[774 NYS2d 836]

—Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1992, was suspended by this Court’s order dated June 7, 1999 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (262 AD2d 702 [1999]).

Respondent has now complied with the registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and has paid the fees as required by the statute and rules of the Chief Administrative Judge. Petitioner does not object to respondent’s instant application for reinstatement.

Respondent’s application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Cardona, EJ., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted, and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(B)

                                                               February 18, 1998




The Board of Directors
Greenwood Trust Company and
Wilmington Trust Company:

We have examined management's assertion, included in its representation letter,
dated February 18, 1998, that Greenwood Trust Company ("GTC") maintained
effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 1997,
insofar as such system relates to the servicing procedures provided by GTC to
prevent or detect misstatements due to error or fraud in amounts that would be
material in relation to the assets of the Discover Card Trust 1991 F (the
"Trust") under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement Sections 3.02, 4.03, 4.06,
4.07, 4.09, and 8.07, dated November 1, 1991 (the "Agreement").

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting,
testing, and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal
control, and such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.

Because of inherent limitations in any internal control, misstatements due to
error or fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projections of any
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting to future periods are
subject to the risk that internal control may become inadequate because of
changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management's assertion that GTC maintained effective internal
control as of December 31, 1997,  insofar as such system relates to the
servicing procedures provided by GTC, to prevent or detect misstatements due to
error or fraud in amounts that would be material in relation to the assets of
the Trust under the Agreement, taken as a whole, is fairly stated, in all
material respects, based upon criteria established in "Internal Control -
Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission.

This report is intended for the information and use of the Board of Directors
and management of GTC, Wilmington Trust Company as Trustee, and the Investor
Certificateholders, and should not be used for any other purpose.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   9
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FILED AS
PART OF THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>            1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          12,468
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              80
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 9,155
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     81,292
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        259,108
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,549
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 358,411
<DEPOSITS>                                     338,765
<SHORT-TERM>                                     5,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,292
<LONG-TERM>                                     10,627
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,250
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,477
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 385,411
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,317
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,314
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    44
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 6,675
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,434
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,573
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,102
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      130
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (34)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,119
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    730
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         545
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       545
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.67
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,185
<LOANS-PAST>                                       632
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,491
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      128
<RECOVERIES>                                        56
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,549
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,549
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            565


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Telicia Owens v. Krista G. Handyside, M.D., Samuel J. Prater, M.D., 

Kenneth A. Totz, D.O., FACEP, and Memorial Hermann Hospital 

System d/b/a Memorial Hermann – Texas Medical Center

Appellate case number: 01-12-01108-CV

Trial court case number: 2012-07534

Trial court: 152nd District Court of Harris County

Appellee Kenneth A. Totz, D.O., FACEP has filed a motion for rehearing and a motion 

for en banc reconsideration. The Court requests a response to the motion for rehearing and the 

motion for en banc reconsideration from appellant Telicia Owens. The response must be filed no 

later than 5:00 p.m., 20 days from the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.2.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Justice Jennings

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: June 30, 2015
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Thomas DRIVER, Appellant.

No. 78-5023.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued July 19, 1978.

Decided Aug. 7, 1978.

*81Phillip G. Kelley, Asst. U. S. Atty., Charlotte, N. C. (Harold M. Edwards, U. S. Atty., Charlotte, N. C., on brief), for appel-lee.

R. Phillip Haire, Sylva, N. C. (Ben Oshel Bridgers, Holt, Haire & Bridgers, Sylva, N. C., on brief), for appellant.

Before BUTZNER, RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The sole issue in Thomas Driver’s appeal from a rape conviction based on 18 U.S.C. §§ 1153 and 2031 is the district court’s ruling, on the government’s motion at the start of trial, that the defense would be forbidden to inquire into the sexual history of the victim except as to any prior sexual contact the victim might have had with the defendant. We affirm.

The evidence showed that Driver was behaving in a generally belligerent manner on the premises of the restaurant where the victim worked. Eventually an employee of the restaurant prevailed on Driver to accept a ride home, but the only available car belonged to the victim. She agreed to take Driver home, and they left in her car accompanied by a male employee of the restaurant. Driver ejected the employee from the car and ordered the victim to drive to a secluded spot where he raped her. After the rape Driver passed out in the victim’s car, and she drove until she met a police vehicle. At trial, Driver’s principal defense was that, because of intoxication, he had no recollection of the crime.

The District of Columbia Court of Appeals has held that testimony concerning a rape victim’s sexual contacts on prior occasions with persons other than the defendant is ordinarily inadmissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 404. *McLean v. United States,*377 A.2d 74, 77-78 (D.C.App.1977). In this carefully reasoned opinion, Judge Kern canvassed the authorities dealing with this issue, and his discussion supports the trial court’s exercise of discretion in excluding the evidence here.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
### Proposed Provision: C2.2. Starting for those age 62 in 2024, index the normal retirement age (NRA) to maintain a constant ratio of expected retirement years (life expectancy at NRA) to potential work years (NRA minus 20). We assume the NRA will increase 1 month every 2 years. Also, raise the earliest eligibility age (EEA) for retired-workers, aged widow(er)s, and disabled widow(er)s by the same amount as the NRA starting for those attaining 62 in 2024.

back
| Subsidiary                             |   | Jurisdiction        |
|----------------------------------------|--------|---------------------|
|                                   |   |                |
| CoaLogix      Inc.                     |   | Delaware            |
|                                   |   |                |
| CoaLogix      Tech LLC                 |   | Delaware            |
|                                   |   |                |
| CoaLogix      Technology Holdings Inc. |   | Delaware            |
|                                   |   |                |
| CoaLogix      Solutions Inc.           |   | Delaware            |
|                                   |   |                |
| SCR-Tech,      LLC                     |   | North      Carolina |
|                                   |   |                |
| DSIT      Solutions Ltd.               |   | Israel              |
|                                   |   |                |
| Glen      & Valley Systems Ltd.    |   | Israel              |
|                                   |   |                |
| DSIT      Sonar and Acoustics Ltd.     |   | Israel              |
|                                   |   |                |
| Coreworx      Inc.                     |   | Ontario             |

----
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 75th 

Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

-2.00% -4.34% 2.17% 2.19% 0.16% -2.15%

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable)

Proposed Provision: Beginning in 2010, make all earnings subject to the OASDI payroll tax and give 

benefit credit using an PIA formula that is extended to provide less credit for those with AIMEs higher 

than the current-law maximum AIME level. The high end of the benefit formula, applied to 2009, would 

be: 15 percent of AIME between $4,482 and $8,900 ($106,800 divided by 12), plus 3 percent of AIME 

over $8,900.

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this provision

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Cost rates with this provision

Income rates under present law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under present law

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Present law With this provision

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2009 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary, Social Security

November 4, 2009

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Cost rates with this provision

Income rates under present law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under present law

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Present law With this provision
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Meditecnic, Inc. (the "Company") on Form  10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof  (the "Report"),  I, Luc Badel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Luc Badel

By: Luc Badel

Chief Financial  Officer

November 6, 2008
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3499 

To amend the Post-Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act of 2006 

to repeal certain obsolete requirements, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 13 (legislative day, JANUARY 10), 2022 

Mr. PETERS (for himself and Mr. PORTMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Post-Katrina Emergency Management Reform 

Act of 2006 to repeal certain obsolete requirements, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF OBSOLETE DHS CONTRACTING RE4 QUIREMENTS. 

5 The Post-Katrina Emergency Management Reform 

6 Act of 2006 (Public Law 109–295; 120 Stat. 1394) is 

7 amended by striking section 692 (6 U.S.C. 792). 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT
      32.2








PRINCIPAL
      FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION








In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Acorn
      Factor, Inc. (the
      "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned,
      Michael Barth, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





1.
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





Dated:
      April 16, 2007





/s/ Michael
      Barth _______________


Michael
      Barth, Chief Financial Officer


(Principal
      Financial Officer)