alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### MRS. LOLA M. RAYBURN v. JOSEPH P. RAYBURN.

(Filed 20 November, 1940.)

1. Judgments § 5—

In an action to have an agreement between the parties made a judgment of the court in accordance with the provisions of the agreement, defendant’s demurrer is properly overruled.

2. Judgments § 11 — -

The action of the court in overruling defendant’s demurrer and at the same time rendering judgment for plaintiff as prayed for in the complaint is error, since defendant has ten days after the demurrer is sustained or, if an appeal is taken, ten days after the certificate of the Supreme Court is received, in which to file answer. C. S., 515.

Appeal by defendant from *Grady, Emergency Judge,*at May Term, 1940, of MeckleNbueg.

Plaintiff instituted action to cause an agreement between tbe parties to be made tbe judgment of tbe court, in accord with tbe provisions of tbe contract. Defendant demurred. Demurrer overruled, and at tbe same time judgment was rendered for plaintiff as prayed for in tbe complaint. Defendant appealed.

*Henderson & Henderson for plaintiff, appellee.*

*J. F. Flowers for defendant, appellant.*

DeviN, J.

Tbe able judge who beard this cause below properly overruled tbe demurrer, but was in error in rendering judgment for tbe plaintiff without allowing defendant tbe statutory period within wbicb to answer.

Tbe applicable procedural statute, G. S., 515, contains this provision : “If tbe demurrer is overruled, tbe answer shall be filed within ten days *515after receipt of tbe judgment, if there is no appeal, or within ten days after receipt of certificate of the Supreme Court, if there is an appeal.” *Law v. Cleveland,*213 N. C., 289, 195 S. E., 809; *Cody v. Hovey,*217 N. C., 407; *Adams v. Cleve, ante,*302.

The prescribed period for answering not having expired, judgment for want of answer was improperly entered and should be stricken out, and an opportunity afforded defendant to answer, if he so desires.

The cause is remanded for such further proceeding in accord with the statute as the parties may elect.

Error and remanded.
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 28 (Thursday, February 11, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7356-7357]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02710]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning

[[Page 7357]]

individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of 
which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal 
privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Integrative Nutrition and Metabolic Processes.
    Date: February 11, 2016.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 1:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Doubletree Hotel Bethesda (Formerly Holiday Inn Select), 
8120 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Elaine Sierra-Rivera, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, EMNR IRG, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes 
of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 6182 MSC 7892, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301 435-2514, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e2908b948790839187a2819190cc8c8b8acc858d94"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9be9f2edfee9fae8fedbf8e8e9b5f5f2f3b5fcf4ed">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 4, 2016.
Carolyn Baum,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-02710 Filed 2-10-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual Balance 

in 75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

B

7

-1.70% -4.20% 0.46% 0.73% -1.24% 

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2008 Trustees Report Office of the Chief A

July 16, 2008

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Retirement Age

Proposed Provision: Shorten the hiatus in the normal retirement age (start increasing to ag62 in 2009) and then increase the NRA by 1 month every 2 years until the NRA reaches ag

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this 

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

0.02.04.06.08.0

10.012.014.016.018.020.0

2008 2018 2028 2038 2048 2058 2068 2078

Year

Percent

Cost rates with this provisionCost rates under present lawIncome rates with this provisionIncome rates under present law

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

 (assets as a percentage of annual expe

0

100200300400500600700800900

1000

2008 2018 2028 2038 2048 2058 

Year

Percent

Present law With this p
### Proposed Provision: E1.4. Increase the payroll tax rate (currently 12.4 percent) by 0.1 percentage point each year from 2029-2048, until the rate reaches 14.4 percent in 2048 and later.
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual Balance 

in 75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

-2.00% -4.34% 0.49% 1.81% -1.51% -2.53%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2009 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary, Social Security

August 26, 2009

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Level of Monthly Benefits (PIA)

Proposed Provision: For OASI beneficiaries becoming eligible for benefits in 2022 and later, multiply the 

PIA factors by the ratio of life expectancy at 67 for 2017 to the life expectancy at age 67 for the 4th year 

prior to the year of benefit eligibility. Unisex life expectancies, based on period life tables, would be used 

as projected by SSA's Office of the Chief Actuary. Disability benefits are not affected by the proposal. 

Disabled worker beneficiaries, upon attaining normal retirement age, would be subject to a proportional 

reduction in benefits based on the worker's years of disability.

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this provision

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Year

Percent

Cost rates with this provision

Cost rates under present law

Income rates with this provision

Income rates under present law

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

 (assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Year

Percent

Present law With this provision
#### SANFORD DOTSON, by His Next Friend, C. W. DOTSON, v. FREDERICK EARLY.

(Filed 23 December, 1931.)

Highways B g — In this case held: the question of contributory negligence should have been submitted to the jury under the evidence.

Where the evidence discloses that the plaintiff, a fourteen-year-old boy, was attached by a dog' while attempting to cross a hard-surfaced highway, and that the boy, while kicking at the dog, retreated towards the middle of the highway, which was straight for more than a hundred yards, and that the boy did not see the defendant’s automobile approaching and was struck by it while in the middle of the highway, *Held,:*the question of contributory negligence should be submitted to the jury, and the granting of the defendant’s motion as of nonsuit is error, and *held further,*the evidence is sufficient to warrant the submission of the issue of the last clear chance.

■ Civil action-, before *Slach, J.,*at September Term, 1931, of Buncombe.

At the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence a judgment of nonsuit was entered and the plaintiff appealed.

*Anderson & Howell for plaintiff.*

*Fortune & Fortune for defendant.*

BhogdeN, J.

The plaintiff’s evidence paints the following picture: A fourteen-year-old boy in broad daylight sets out to the spring to get a bucket of milk for his mother. The spring is on the opposite side of an improved hard-surfaced highway. Procuring the milk, he starts back across the road. The road is straight for more than one hundred yards. Just as he reaches the shoulder of the road a feist, accompanied by another dog, makes an attack upon the barefoot boy. The other dog apparently takes no part in the unlawful -assault but stands by giving aid and comfort to the feist. The boy retreats toward the center of the road, kicking at the pursuing feist. As the boy reaches the center of the road, the defendant,- driving an automobile, traveling at the rate of twenty-five miles an hour, struck the boy in the back or side, knocking him to the pavement and inflicting injury. The boy did not see the automobile until after the injury. An eye witness said: “I noticed that Mr. Early did not make much effort to drive around him and the car struck the boy and knocked him down.”

Ordinarily a scrap between a fourteen-year-old weaponless boy and a feist would be a fair fight, and while a much used highway is a dangerous place to stage the encounter, nevertheless it is the province of a jury to say whether or not under all the circumstances the boy *9was guilty o£ contributory negligence. Moreover, if a jury shall find that the negligence of the boy contributed to bis injury, there is sufficient evidence in the record to warrant an issue of last clear chance. *Redmon v. R. R.,*195 N. C., 764, 143 S. E., 829; *Goss v. Williams,*196 N. C., 213, 145 S. E., 169.

Reversed.
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual Balance 

in 75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

-2.00% -4.34% 1.31% 3.97% -0.69% -0.37%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2009 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary, Social Security

August 26, 2009

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Level of Monthly Benefits (PIA)

Proposed Provision: Progressive price indexing of PIA formula factors beginning with individuals newly 

eligible for OASDI benefits in 2016. Create new bend point at the 30th percentile of earners. Maintain 

current-law benefits for earners at the 30th percentile and below and reduce upper 2 formula factors 

(32% and 15%) such that maximum worker benefit grows by inflation rather than the growth in average 

wages.

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this provision

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Year

Percent

Cost rates with this provision

Cost rates under present law

Income rates with this provision

Income rates under present law

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

 (assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Year

Percent

Present law With this provision
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 28 (Friday, February 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 8063]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3397]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-29,931]


Dresser Industries, Inc., Guiberson-Ava Division, Dallas, TX; 
Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance

    In the matter of Dresser Industries, Inc. Operating at Various 
Locations in the Following States: TA-W-29,931A Alaska, TA-W-29,931B 
California, TA-W-29,931C Colorado, TA-W-29,931D Illinois, TA-W-
29,931E Kansas, TA-W-29,931F Louisiana, TA-W-29,931G New Mexico, TA-
W-29,931H North Dakota, TA-W-29,931I Ohio, TA-W-29,931J Oklahoma, 
TA-W-29,931K Texas except Dallas, TA-W-29,931L Wyoming.

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on December 2, 1994, applicable 
to all workers of the subject firm. The certification was published in 
the Federal Register on December 16, 1994 (59 FR 65075).
    At the request of the State Agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. New findings show that 
worker separations occurred at various locations in other States.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to 
properly reflect the correct worker group.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of the Guiberson-Ava Division of Dresser Industries, Inc., who 
were adversely affected by increased imports of crude oil.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-29,931 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of the Guiberson-Ava Division of Dresser Industries, 
Inc., Dallas, Texas and operating at various locations in the 
following States: Alaska, California, Colorado, Illinois, Kansas, 
Louisiana, New Mexico, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Texas (except 
Dallas) and Wyoming who became totally or partially separated from 
employment on or after May 20, 1993 are eligible to apply for 
adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of January 1995.
Victor J. Trunzo,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-3397 Filed 2-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9719]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4093]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
[AC-09; OTS No. 03357]


Reliance Federal Savings and Loan Association of St. Louis 
County, St. Louis, Missouri; Approval of Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on February 2, 1995, the Deputy 
Assistant Director, Corporate Activities, Office of Thrift Supervision, 
or her designee, acting pursuant to delegated authority, approved the 
application of Reliance Federal Savings and Loan Association of St. 
Louis County, St. Louis, Missouri, to convert to the stock form of 
organization. Copies of the application are available for inspection at 
the Information Services Division, Office of Thrift Supervision, 1700 G 
Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20552, and the Midwest Regional Office, 
Office of Thrift Supervision, 122 W. John Carpenter Freeway, Suite 600, 
Irving, Texas 75039.

    Dated: February 14, 1995.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Nadine Y. Washington,
Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-4093 Filed 2-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT


To the Board of Directors
Semiconductor Packaging Materials Co., Inc.

We hereby consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(No. 33-84752, No. 33-95762 and No. 333-7797) on Form S-8 of our report dated
January 31, 1998 related to the consolidated balance sheet of Semiconductor
Packaging Materials Co., Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996,
and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity, and
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997,
which report appears in the December 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K of
Semiconductor Packaging Materials Co., Inc.


/s/ GOLDSTEIN GOLUB KESSLER & COMPANY, P.C.
-------------------------------------------
GOLDSTEIN GOLUB KESSLER & COMPANY, P.C.
New York, New York

March 19, 1998
### Proposed Provision: B2.1. Beginning with those newly eligible for OASI benefits in 2033, multiply the PIA factors by the ratio of life expectancy at 67 for 2028 to the life expectancy at age 67 for the 4th year prior to the year of benefit eligibility. Unisex life expectancies, based on period life tables as computed by SSA's Office of the Chief Actuary, are used to determine the ratio. Disabled workers are: (a) not affected prior to normal retirement age; and (b) subject to a proportional reduction in benefits, based on the worker's years of disability, upon conversion to retired-worker beneficiary status.

back
EXHIBIT 31.1  I, Mislav Pavelic, in my capacity indicated below, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of OpenCell BioMed, Inc. (the Registrant); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; 5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  Date: March 15,
2010 /s/ Mislav Pavelic Mislav Pavelic, President (as Principal Executive Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 8425]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3643]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[NAFTA-00325]


Regency Vegetable House Naples, Florida; Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Title V of the North American Free Trade Agreement 
Implementation Act (P.L. 103-182) concerning transitional adjustment 
assistance, hereinafter called (NAFTA-TAA), and in accordance with 
Section 250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title II, of the Trade Act of 
1974, as amended (19 USC (2273), an investigation was initiated on 
January 9, 1995 in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers at 
Regency Vegetable House in Naples, Florida. The investigation revealed 
that workers of Regency Vegetable House were separated in June 1994 
when production ceased and that the firm packaged and sold vegetables 
to substantially the same customers as Regency Packing Company (NAFTA-
TAA-00227). On January 31, 1995 an amendment was made to NAFTA-TAA-
00227 to include all workers of Regency Vegetable House in Naples, 
Florida. Because the subject workers have been included in the 
amendment certification of NAFTA-TAA-00227, further information in this 
case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, D.C., this 1st day of February 1995.
Victor J. Trunzo,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-3643 Filed 2-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
#### WALTER HAWKINS, NORA A. HAWKINS, D. C. ARRINGTON, ROSETTA ARRINGTON, DOLLIA ARRINGTON, STELLA ARRINGTON and SABINA PERKINS, v. THE FEDERAL LAND BANK OF COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA.

(Filed 29 September, 1943.)

Appeal by plaintiffs from *Frizzelle, J.,*at November-December Term, 1942, of Halifax. No error.

Civil action to vacate foreclosure deed.

Appropriate issues were submitted to the jury and answered in favor of the defendant. From judgment thereon plaintiffs appealed.

*Keel & Keel for plaintiffs, appellants.*

*Wade H. Dickens for defendant, appellee.*

Per Curiam.

This case was here on a former appeal. See *Hawkins v. Land Bank,*221 N. C., 73, 18 S. E. (2d), 823, where the essential facts are stated. This appeal should have been docketed at the Spring Term. Rule 5, 221 N. C., 546. Be that as it may, the jury has decided the controverted facts in favor of the defendant. The exceptive assignments of error relied upon by the plaintiffs are without substantial merit. The judgment entered must be sustained.

No error.
Skip to main content

# Social Security

Search
Menu
Español
Sign in

## 

Office of the Chief Actuary

Detailed Calculator Home

## Social Security Benefit Calculator User's Guide

User's guide

The user's guide for the calculator is now simply the help files that come             with the calculator. The help files are in HTML format. For the Windows             version, the help files are compiled into Windows HTML Help format. For the             Mac OS version, the help files are available as separate HTML files.

There is no separate printed user's guide. However, if you would like a             printed version of the help files, you can download a Microsoft Word or Adobe             PDF document that contains the help files reformatted into a printable             document. To download, click on one of the following entries:
| Type of file   | Documentation file           |
|----------------|------------------------------|
| Microsoft Word | anypia32.doc (90,498 bytes)  |
| Adobe PDF      | anypia32.pdf (380,709 bytes) |

Questions or comments

If you have questions or comments about the Detailed Calculator, please visit our      Contact Social Security       page for ways to contact us.  Remember to use "Detailed Calculator" as the subject      so we know which calculator your question or comment refers to.

Footer menu