alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual Balance 

in 75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Ann

Balan

75th 

-1.92% -5.70% 0.64% 0.00% -1.29% -5.7

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2005 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actu

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Trust Fund Investment in Equities

Proposed Provision: Invest 40 percent of the Trust Funds in equities (phased in 2006-2020), ultimate 5.5 percent real rate of return on equities

January 4, 2006

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this prov

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

0.005.00

10.0015.0020.0025.00

2005 2015 2025 2035 2045 2055 2065 2075

Year

Percent

Cost rates with this provisionCost rates under present lawIncome rates with this provisionIncome rates under present law

OASDI tax rate schedule 

(employees and employers, each)

1993 and later 6.2%

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditu

0

100200300400500600700800900

1000

2005 2015 2025 2035 2045 205

Year

Percent

Present law with thi
|EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICEROF GUARANTY
BANCSHARES, INC.PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Arthur B. Scharlach, Jr., Chief
Executive Officer of Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
that:
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|1. |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of
               the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the Companys financial condition and results of operations.
|-- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|By: /s/ Arthur B. Scharlach, Jr.
Arthur B. Scharlach, Jr.President & Chief Executive Officer

Dated: August 13, 2003
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|29
|--
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 3.2

                                               STATE OF DELAWARE
                                               SECRETARY OF STATE
                                            DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS
                                           FILED 09:000 AM 10/30/2002
                                              020676336 - 02274303




                                STATE OF DELAWARE
                           CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF
                          CERTTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                               NUWAY ENERGY, INC.

Resolved, that the meeting of the Board of Directors of NuWay Energy, Inc. was
duly held and that the following actions were approved by the Board of Directors
of the Company:

Resolved, that the name of the company NuWay Energy, Inc. will be changed to the
name NuWay Medical Inc.

Further resolved, that this amendment to the certificate of incorporation is
hereby amended to provide for this name change effective the date of this
resolution.

Further resolved, that pursuant to a resolution of its Board of Directors, a
special meeting of the stockholders of said corporation was duly called and
held, upon notice and in accordance with Section 222 of the General Corporate
Law of the State of Delaware at which meeting the necessary shares as required
by statue [sic] were voted in favor of this amendment.

That this amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of
Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

Director

/s/
______________________________
BY: Joe Provenzano
It's Authorized Agent

<PAGE>
Year Cost Rate

Income 

Rate

Annual 

Balance

2008 11.20 12.77 1.57 359

2009 11.26 12.81 1.54 369

2010 11.37 12.82 1.46 378

2011 11.53 12.84 1.31 386

2012 11.76 12.87 1.11 392

2013 12.03 12.90 0.87 394

2014 12.32 12.92 0.60 395

2015 12.61 12.94 0.32 393

2016 12.92 12.96 0.04 390

2017 13.22 12.98 -0.24 385

2018 13.51 13.00 -0.50 379

2019 13.79 13.02 -0.77 372

2020 14.06 13.04 -1.02 364

2021 14.32 13.06 -1.26 355

2022 14.55 13.07 -1.47 346

2023 14.77 13.09 -1.68 335

2024 14.97 13.10 -1.87 324

2025 15.16 13.12 -2.04 313

2026 15.33 13.13 -2.20 300

2027 15.48 13.14 -2.34 288

2028 15.62 13.15 -2.47 274

2029 15.74 13.16 -2.58 260

2030 15.84 13.17 -2.67 246

2031 15.90 13.17 -2.73 232

2032 15.95 13.18 -2.77 218

2033 15.97 13.18 -2.79 203

2034 15.96 13.18 -2.77 189

2035 15.93 13.18 -2.74 174

2036 15.88 13.18 -2.70 160

2037 15.82 13.18 -2.64 146

2038 15.74 13.18 -2.56 132

2039 15.65 13.17 -2.47 118

2040 15.54 13.17 -2.37 105

2041 15.43 13.17 -2.26 91

2042 15.32 13.16 -2.16 79

2043 15.20 13.16 -2.05 66

2044 15.09 13.15 -1.94 54

2045 14.98 13.15 -1.84 42

2046 14.88 13.14 -1.74 31

2047 14.78 13.14 -1.64 20

2048 14.68 13.13 -1.55 9

2049 14.59 13.13 -1.46 ----

2050 14.51 13.13 -1.38 ----

2051 14.43 13.12 -1.31 ----

2052 14.36 13.12 -1.24 ----

2053 14.29 13.12 -1.17 ----

2054 14.22 13.11 -1.11 ----

2055 14.16 13.11 -1.05 ----

2056 14.11 13.11 -1.00 ----

2057 14.06 13.11 -0.95 ----

2058 14.01 13.10 -0.90 ----

2059 13.96 13.10 -0.85 ----

2060 13.91 13.10 -0.81 ----

2061 13.86 13.10 -0.76 ----

2062 13.81 13.10 -0.71 ----

2063 13.76 13.09 -0.67 ----

2064 13.72 13.09 -0.62 ----

2065 13.67 13.09 -0.58 ----

Detailed Single Year Tables

Category of Change: Level of Monthly Benefits (PIA)

Proposed Provision: Progressive price indexing of PIA formula factors beginning with individuals newly 

eligible for OASDI benefits in 2015. Create new bend point at the 30th percentile of earners. Maintain 

current-law benefits for earners at the 30th percentile and below and reduce upper 2 formula factors 

(32% and 15%) such that maximum worker benefit grows by inflation rather than the growth in average 

wages.

Expressed as a percentage of taxable payrol Trust Fund 

Ratio 

1-1-year
2066 13.63 13.09 -0.54 ----

2067 13.59 13.09 -0.51 ----

2068 13.56 13.09 -0.47 ----

2069 13.52 13.08 -0.43 ----

2070 13.48 13.08 -0.40 ----

2071 13.45 13.08 -0.37 ----

2072 13.42 13.08 -0.34 ----

2073 13.39 13.08 -0.31 ----

2074 13.35 13.08 -0.28 ----

2075 13.32 13.08 -0.25 ----

2076 13.30 13.07 -0.22 ----

2077 13.27 13.07 -0.19 ----

2078 13.24 13.07 -0.17 ----

2079 13.22 13.07 -0.14 ----

2080 13.19 13.07 -0.12 ----

2081 13.17 13.07 -0.10 ----

2082 13.14 13.07 -0.08 ----

2083 13.12 13.07 -0.05 ----

2084 13.10 13.07 -0.03 ----

2085 13.07 13.06 -0.01 ----

Summarized Rates: OASDI

2008 Cost Rate Income Rate

Actuarial 

Balance

-2082 14.21% 13.86% -0.34% 1.36%

Office of the Chief Actuary, Social Security

Estimates based on Intermediate Assumptions of the 2008 Trustees Report

Change in 

Actuarial Balance

July 17, 2008
#### In the Matter of Charles Denison.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Opinion by

Brady, J.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 241 (Friday, December 15, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 64348-64349]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30515]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 88-40; RM-6035, RM-6349, RM-6350]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Jacksonville, Pine Knoll Shores, and 
Harkers Island, NC

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document grants a Petition for Reconsideration filed by 
Down East Radio to the extent of deleting Channel 272A from Pine Knoll 
Shores, North Carolina. See 57 FR 19809, May 8, 1992. With this action, 
the proceeding is terminated.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 22, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Hayne, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 
776-1654.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Memorandum Opinion and Order, MM Docket No. 88-40, adopted November 9, 
1995, and released December 8, 1995. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., 
Washington, 

[[Page 64349]]
DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractors, International Transcription Service, 
Inc. (202) 857-3800, 1919 M Street, NW., Room 246, 2100 M Street NW., 
Suite 140, Washington, DC 20037.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: Secs. 303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1082; 47 U.S.C. 154, 
as amended.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under North 
Carolina, is amended by removing Pine Knoll Shores, Channel 272A.

Federal Communications Commission.
Douglas W. Webbink,
Chief, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 95-30515 Filed 12-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable) | Description of Proposed Provision:      Raise payroll tax rates (for employees and employers combined) by 2.0 percentage points in 2022 (to 14.4% combined) and by an additional 2.0 percentage points in 2052 (to 16.4% combined). |
|-------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                           |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2009 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified August 31, 2009 |
#### COVA ELLEN HOOVER v. MARY BETTY THOMAS ODOM.

(Filed 29 April, 1959.)

Trial § 25—

In a civil action, ¡the plaintiff against whom no counterclaim is asserted and no affirmative relief demanded may *take*a voluntary nonsuit and get out of count at any time 'before ¡vardlict, and it is error for the court to refuse to permit him to take a voluntary nonsuit and to enter a judgment of involuntary nonsuit.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Johnston, J.,*November, 1958 Term, RANDOLPH Superior Oourt.

Civil -action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been caused ¡by the actionable negligence of the defendant while plaintiff was riding in an -automobile owned and driven by -the defendant. The defendant, by answer, denied negligence and pleaded contributory negligence as a bar to .the plaintiff’s action.

At the close of the plaintiff’s evidence the defendant made -a motion for judgment of nonsuit. During the argument on the motion and *236“while counsel for the plaintiff bad ithe floor, he abruptly stated that he would take a voluntary nonsuit.” The trial judge, however, refused to permit the plaintiff to take a voluntary nonsuit and entered a judgment of involuntary nonsuit. From the judgment, the plaintiff appealed.

*Don Davis, Ottway Burton for plaintiff, appellant.*

*Smith, Moore, Smith, Schell & Hunter, By: Bynum M. Hunter for defendant, appellee.*

Per CuRiAM.

The rule is uniformly observed in this State that a plaintiff, in an ordinary civil action, againist whom no counterclaim is asserted and no 'affirmative relief is demanded, may take a voluntary nonsuit and get out of court at any time before verdict. *Everett v. Yopp,*247 N.C. 38, 100 S.E. 2d 221. The judgment of involuntary nonsuit is, therefore, set aside. The cause is remanded to the Superior Count of Randolph County where judgment of voluntary nonsuit will be entered. '

Reversed and Remanded.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent ofIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors

Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.:

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-4(Registration No. 333-144427) of Sally Holdings LLC of our reports dated November 25,2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Sally Holdings LLC(prior to November 16, 2006, Sally Holdings, Inc.) and subsidiariesas of September 30, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statementsof earnings, cash flows and member’s/stockholder’s (deficit) equity for each ofthe years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2008, and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30,2008, which reports appear in the September 30, 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-Kof Sally Holdings LLC.

 
| /s/ KPMG LLP           |   |
|------------------------|--------|
|                   |   |
| KPMG LLP               |   |
| Dallas, Texas          |   |
| November 25, 2008 |   |

 

----
## Detailed Single Year Tables

- Individual Provisions
- Level of Monthly Benefits

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						B7.13: Eliminate the DI 5-month waiting period for disabled workers and disabled surviving spouses, and eliminate the 24-month Medicare (HI) waiting period for individuals who have become entitled to Social Security disability benefits.  Effective with 2024 applications.**

### Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program

### Summarized Estimates
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 75th 

Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

-2.00% -4.34% 0.73% 0.91% -1.28% -3.43%

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable)

Proposed Provision: Increase the payroll tax rate (currently 12.4 percent) to 12.6 percent in 2012, 12.9 

percent in 2020, 13.1 in percent in 2030, 13.9 percent in 2040, 13.5 percent in 2050, and 13.3 percent in 

2060.

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this provision

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Cost rates with this provision

Income rates under present law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under present law

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Present law With this provision

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2009 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary, Social Security

January 28, 2010

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Cost rates with this provision

Income rates under present law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under present law

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Present law With this provision
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 5448-5    Filed: 01/22/20    Entered: 01/22/20 15:20:07    Page 1of 6

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 5448-5    Filed: 01/22/20    Entered: 01/22/20 15:20:07    Page 2of 6

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 5448-5    Filed: 01/22/20    Entered: 01/22/20 15:20:07    Page 3of 6

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 5448-5    Filed: 01/22/20    Entered: 01/22/20 15:20:07    Page 4of 6

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 5448-5    Filed: 01/22/20    Entered: 01/22/20 15:20:07    Page 5of 6

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 5448-5    Filed: 01/22/20    Entered: 01/22/20 15:20:07    Page 6of 6
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**126 KA 10-02222**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, WHALEN, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

LEON BLOOM, JR., ALSO KNOWN AS LEON C. BLOOM, ALSO KNOWN AS LEON C. BLOOM, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

BRIDGET L. FIELD, ROCHESTER, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

LAWRENCE FRIEDMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATAVIA (WILLIAM G. ZICKL OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Genesee County Court (Robert C. Noonan, J.), rendered June 3, 2010. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of grand larceny in the fourth degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon a jury verdict, of grand larceny in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 155.30 [1]). As defendant correctly concedes, his contention that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the conviction is not preserved for our review because defendant failed to renew his motion for a trial order of dismissal after presenting proof ( see People v Hines , 97 NY2d 56, 61, rearg denied 97 NY2d 678). In any event, defendant’s contention lacks merit ( see generally People v Bleakley , 69 NY2d 490, 495) and, viewing the evidence in light of the elements of the crime as charged to the jury ( see People v Danielson , 9 NY3d 342, 349), we reject defendant’s further contention that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence ( see generally Bleakley , 69 NY2d at 495). “[T]he jury was in the best position to assess the credibility of the witnesses and, on this record, it cannot be said that the jury failed to give the evidence the weight it should be accorded” ( People v Orta , 12 AD3d 1147, 1147, lv denied 4 NY3d 801).
Finally, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: February 8, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3713 

To codify the essential holdings of Roe v. Wade (410 U.S. 113 (1973)) 

and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey (505 

U.S. 833 (1992)). 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2022 

Ms. COLLINS (for herself and Ms. MURKOWSKI) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To codify the essential holdings of Roe v. Wade (410 U.S. 

113 (1973)) and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern 

Pennsylvania v. Casey (505 U.S. 833 (1992)). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reproductive Choice 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PURPOSE. 

7 It is the purpose of this Act to codify the essential 

8 holdings of Roe v. Wade (410 U.S. 113 (1973)) and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3713 IS

1 Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. 

2 Casey (505 U.S. 833 (1992)). 

3 SEC. 3. CLARIFICATION OF ALLOWABLE STATE REQUIRE4 MENTS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—A State— 

6 (1) may not impose an undue burden on the 

7 ability of a woman to choose whether or not to ter8 minate a pregnancy before fetal viability; 

9 (2) may restrict the ability of a woman to 

10 choose whether or not to terminate a pregnancy 

11 after fetal viability, unless such a termination is nec12 essary to preserve the life or health of the woman; 

13 and 

14 (3) may enact regulations to further the health 

15 or safety of a woman seeking to terminate a preg16 nancy. 

17 (b) CLARIFICATION.—For purposes of this Act, un18 necessary health regulations that have the purpose or ef19 fect of presenting a substantial obstacle to a woman seek20 ing to terminate a pregnancy impose an undue burden. 

21 (c) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this Act 

22 shall be construed to have any effect on laws regarding 

23 conscience protection. 

24 SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS. 

25 In this Act: 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3713 IS

1 (1) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ includes the 

2 District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto 

3 Rico, and each other territory or possession of the 

4 United States, and any subdivision of any of the 

5 foregoing. 

6 (2) UNDUE BURDEN.—The term ‘‘undue bur7 den’’ means any burden that places a substantial ob8 stacle in the path of a woman seeking to terminate 

9 a pregnancy prior to fetal viability. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### Tom S. Wotkyns, Respondent, v. Bradford C. Vaughn, Appellant.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements for printing, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

Opinion by

Bockes, J.
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 75th 

Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

-2.00% -4.34% 0.22% 0.28% -1.78% -4.06%

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable)

Proposed Provision: Apply 3 percent payroll tax rate on earnings over $400,000 in 2017, with the 

$400,000 threshold wage-indexed after 2017. Give no benefit credit for additional earnings in AIME for 

benefit computation.

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this provision

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Cost rates with this provision

Income rates under present law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under present law

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Present law With this provision

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2009 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary, Social Security

May 14, 2010

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Cost rates with this provision

Income rates under present law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under present law

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Present law With this provision