alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 75th 

Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

-2.00% -4.34% 1.34% 3.33% -0.66% -1.01%

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Level of Monthly Benefits (PIA)

Proposed Provision: Progressive indexing of PIA formula factors beginning with individuals newly eligible 

for OASI benefits in 2012 through 2061. Create new bend point at the 30th percentile of earners. 

Maintain current-law benefits for earners at the 30th percentile and below and reduce upper 2 formula 

factors (32% and 15%) such that maximum worker benefit is reduced by 1.1 percent per year as 

compared to current law, for the years that progressive indexing applies. Disability benefits are not 

affected by the proposal. Disabled worker beneficiaries, upon attaining normal retirement age, would be 

subject to a proportional reduction in benefits based on the worker's years of disability.

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this provision

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

Percent

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Cost rates with this provision

Income rates under present law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under present law

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000 Percent

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Present law With this provision

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2009 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary, Social Security

January 28, 2010

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Cost rates with this provision

Income rates under present law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under present law

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Present law With this provision
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Level of OASDI Contribution and Benefit Base | Description of Proposed Provision:      Impose a 3 percent payroll tax on OASDI covered earnings above the current taxable maximum starting in 2009.  Benefit computations would not reflect any earnings above the taxable maximum amount. |
|----------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                              |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2008 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified July 16, 2008 |
EXHIBIT 32.2

       CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NASB Financial, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2011, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Rhonda Nyhus, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.


August 9, 2011             By:  /s/ Rhonda Nyhus
                                Rhonda Nyhus
                                 Vice President and Treasurer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to NASB Financial, Inc. and will be retained by NASB
Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.



This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for
any other purpose.

<Page>
#### STATE v. SAM SILVER

(Filed 16 April, 1947.)

Rape § 23—

In a prosecution for assault upon a feinale, evidence tending to sliow only that defendant asked prosecutrix an improper question, unaccompanied by a show of violence, threats or any display of force, is insufficient to be submitted to- the jury, and defendant’s motion to nonsuit should have been granted.

Appeal by defendant from *Thompson, J.,*at October Term, 1946, of FbANKLIN.

Criminal prosecution tried upon a warrant charging defendant with an assault upon a female.

*353Tbfere was a verdict of guilty and from tbe judgment pronounced tbereon, tbe defendant appealed to tbe Supreme Court, assigning error.

*Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorneys-General Bruton, Rhodes, and Moody for the State.*

*Yarborough .& Yarborough for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

Tbis appeal is based upon tbe refusal of tbe court below to grant tbe defendant’s motion for judgment as of nonsuit. Tbe correctness of tbe ruling on tbe motion depends upon wbetber tbe defendant committed an assault upon tbe prosecutrix by asking ber an improper question, unaccompanied by a show of violence, threats or any. display of force. We tbink tbe evidence disclosed on tbe record is insufficient to sustain tbe verdict. Tbe defendant’s motion should have been granted.

Eeversed.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
  OrCAD, Inc.
 
     We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 333-04811, 333-15099 and 333-15145) of OrCAD, Inc. and
subsidiaries of our reports dated January 27, 1997, relating to the consolidated
balance sheets of OrCAD, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and
cash flows and related schedule for each of the years in the three-year period
ended December 31, 1996, which reports appear in the December 31, 1996 Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB of OrCAD, Inc. and subsidiaries.
 
                                          KMPG PEAT MARWICK LLP
Portland, Oregon
March 28, 1997
#### Sipe’s Estate

(No. 2).

March 12, 1906:

Opinion by

Rice, P. J.,

The questions raised upon these several appeals are precisely the same as those considered in the appeal of George B. Sipe, ante, p. 145. For the reasons there given the decree is affirmed and the appeals dismissed at the costs of the several appellants therein.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #14610 and #14611]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Idaho (FEMA-4252-DR), dated 02/01/2016. *Incident:*
                         Severe Winter Storms. *Incident Period:*
                         12/16/2015 through 12/27/2015.
 Effective Date: 02/01/2016. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         04/01/2016. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         11/01/2016.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 02/01/2016, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: Primary Counties: Benewah, Bonner, Kootenai. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625*For Economic Injury:*Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 14610B and for economic injury is 14611B. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) James E. Rivera, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2016-02546 Filed 2-8-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

       CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NASB Financial, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending December 31, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, David H. Hancock, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.


June 30, 2011              By: /s/ David H. Hancock
                               David H. Hancock
                               Chairman and Chief
                                 Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to NASB Financial, Inc. and will be retained by NASB
Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.


This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for
any other purpose.

<Page>
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT YENNI LUKM AN SIM ON, Pe titione r, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 11-73706 Age n c y No. A089-884-296 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d

Nove m b e r 19, 2013 ** B e fore : C ANB Y, TR OTT, a nd THOM AS, C irc uit Judge s. Ye nni Lukm an Sim on, a

native and c itiz e n of Indone sia , pe titions for re vie w of the B o ard of Im

m igration Appe a ls’ orde r sum m a rily a ffirm ing a

n im m igration judge ’ s (“ IJ” ) de c i sion de ny ing he r a pplic ation for a sy lum and withholding of re m ova l. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie wfor substa ntia l 

# FIL ED D EC 10 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).e vide nc e fa c tua l findings, se e W ak k ary v . Holde r , 558 F.3d 1049, 1056 (9th C ir. 2009), a

nd we de ny the pe tition for re v i e w. Substa ntia l e v i de nc e supports the IJ’ s de te rm ination tha

t Sim o n’ s e xpe rie nc e s in Indone s ia , e v e n c onside re d c um ulat ive ly , do not riseto the le ve l of pa st pe rse c ution. Se e id . at 1059-60 (be ing be ate n by y o uths, robbe d of sa

n da ls and poc ke t m one y , a

nd a c c oste d by

a thre ate n ing m o b did not c om pe l a pa st pe rse c ution finding). Substa nt ia l e vide n c e a lso supports the IJ’ s de te rm ination that , e ve n unde r a

disfa vore d group a

na l y s is, Sim on ha s not e sta b lishe d a we llfounde d fe ar of pe rse c ution in Indone sia be c a use she did not de m onstra t e suffic ie nt individualiz e d

risk. Se e Halim v . Holde r , 590 F.3d 971, 979 (9th C ir. 2009); se e also Loho v . Muk

ase y , 531 F.3d 1016, 1017-18 (9th C ir. 2008) (“ willingly re turning to [pe titione r’ s] hom e c ountry m ilita te s a ga inst a

finding of . . . we llfounde d fe ar” ). Ac c o rdingly , Sim on’ s a s y lum c l a im fa ils. B e c a use she fa ile d to e s ta

blish e ligibility

for a sy lum , Sim on ne c e ssa rily fa ile d to m e e t the m ore stringe nt sta nda rd for withholding of rem ova l . Se e Ze haty e v . Gonzale

s , 453 F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th C ir. 2006). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D.

1 1 - 7 3 7 0 6 2
The Attorney General of Texas 

April 16, 1980 

MARK WHITE 

Attorney General 

Honorable Gibson D. (Gib) Lewis 

Committee on Intergovernmental 

Affairs 

House of Representatives 

Austin, Texas 78769 

Opinion No. MW-174 

Re: Whether a Board of Firemen’s 

Relief and Retirement Fund 

Trustees is covered by the Open 

Meetings Act. 

Dear Representative Lewis: 

You have asked our opinion on two questions relating to the application 

of the Texas Open Meetings Act, article 6252-17, V.T.C.S., to boards of 

Firemen’s Relief and Retirement Fund Trustees. Your first question is: 

Does the Board of Firemen’s Relief and Retirement 

Fund Trustees as set ,forth by Article 6243e, V.T.C.S., 

constitute a ‘governmental body’ as defined by Article 

6252-17, V.T.C.S., The Open Meetings Act’ 

The Texas Open Meetings Act applies to “governmental bodies” as 

defined by that act. Section l(c) defines “governmental body” to include 

n 

. . . every deliberative body having rule-making or quasi-judicial power and 

classified as a department, agency, or political subdivision of a county or 

city.” Boards of Firemen’s Relief and Retirement Fund Trustees are 

established in sections 3 and 3B of article 6243e, V.T.C.S. They are 

composed of city officials and elected members of the fire department. In 

some instances resident citizens of the city are selected to serve as well. 

The boards’ basic duty is to administer the retirement program established 

under article 6243e, V.T.C.S. 

We believe that it is clear that these boards are departments or 

agencies of the city and have rule-making and quasi-judicial power. 

Compare V.T.C.S. article 6243e, section 9 and Board of Firemen’s Relief 

and Retirement Fund Trustees of Harris County v. Stevens, 372 S.W.2d 572 

ITex. Civ. App. - Houston 1963, no writ) (quasi-judicial authority) with 

Attorney General Opinion H-467 (1974) (definition of rule-making and qux 

judicial authority). 

p. 553 
Honorable Gibson D. (Gib) Lewis - Page Two (MW-174) 

Accordingly, we believe Boards of Firemen’s Relief and Retirement Fund Trustees 

are governmental bodies covered by the Texas Open Meetings Act. 

Your second question is: 

Are instances detailed by statute or opinion whereby a Board of 

Firemen’s Relief and Retirement Fund Trustees can enter 

‘executive session,’ and exclude the public. 

Section 2 of the Open Meetings Act details instances in which an executive session is 

permissible. Whether any particular meeting is properly closed under one of these 

exceptions set out in section 2 will depend on the facts of the specific situation. 

SUMMARY 

Boards of Firemen’s Relief and Retirement Fund Trustees are 

governmental bodies covered by the Texas Open Meeti 

MARK WHITE 

Attorney General of Texas 

JOHN W. FAINTER, JR. 

First Assistant Attorney General 

TED L. HARTLEY 

Executive Assistant Attorney General 

Prepared by C. Robert Heath 

Assistant Attorney General 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COMMITTEE 

C. Robert Heath, Chairman 

Jim Allison 

Susan Garrison 

Rick Gilpin 

Bruce Youngblood 

P. 554
#### THE CONSOLIDATED BANK OF McCOLL et al. v. SILAS N. McCALL et al.

(Filed 26 October, 1932.)

Appeal by defendants from *Barnhill, J.,*at May Term, 1932, of Robeson.

Civil action to recover on a promissory note executed by the defendants.

*849The defendants set up a counterclaim alleging usury and asked for an accounting.

There was a reference under the statute, and on exceptions to the referee’s report, judgment was entered for the plaintiff. Defendants appeal, assigning errors.

*J ohn G. Proctor and W. 3. Humphrey, Jr., for plaintiffs.*

*J. E. Carpenter for defendants.*

Per Curiam.

No reversible error has been made to appear on the record, hence the judgment will be upheld.

Affirmed.
# Please wait...

If this message is not eventually replaced by the proper contents of the document, your PDF viewer may not be able to display this type of document.

You can upgrade to the latest version of Adobe Reader for Windows®, Mac, or Linux® by visiting http://www.adobe.com/go/reader_download.

For more assistance with Adobe Reader visit http://www.adobe.com/go/acrreader.

Windows is either a registered trademark or a trademark of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries. Mac is a trademark of Apple Inc., registered in the United States and other countries. Linux is the registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the U.S. and other countries. ACCEPTED 06-15-00095-CV SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 11/2/2015 4:43:16 PM DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 24 (Friday, February 5, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 6333]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02200]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Transit Administration


Notice To Rescind Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental 
Impact Statement Virginia Beach Transit Extension Study, Virginia

AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration (FTA), DOT.

ACTION: Rescind Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an Environmental 
Impact Statement (EIS).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FTA in cooperation with Hampton Roads Transit (HRT) is issuing 
this notice to advise the public that the NOI to prepare an EIS for the 
Virginia Beach Transit Extension Study (VBTES) is being rescinded.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Ryan Long, Community Planner, 
Federal Transit Administration Region III, 1760 Market St, Suite 500 
Philadelphia, PA 19103, phone 215-656-7051, email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#42303b232c6c2e2d2c2502262d366c252d34"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="710308101f5f1d1e1f1631151e055f161e07">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FTA, as the lead Federal agency, and HRT, as 
the project sponsor, published an NOI in the Federal Register on August 
14, 2013 (FR Volume 78, Number 157) to prepare an EIS for the VBTES. 
The VBTES EIS evaluated extending transit service from the eastern 
terminus of HRT's existing Light Rail Transit (LRT) system, ``The 
Tide,'' at Newtown Road in Norfolk to the Virginia Beach oceanfront. 
The extension would travel either along the former Norfolk Southern 
Railroad right-of-way (NSRR ROW) that runs from Newtown Road to 
Birdneck Road, or along the NSRR ROW to Laskin Road then onto Birdneck 
Road and terminating at the Virginia Beach oceanfront.
    HRT was intending to seek Capital Investment Grant Program (CIG) 
funding from FTA for one or more of the alternatives that were examined 
in the Draft EIS. The CIG program, more commonly known as the New 
Starts, Small Starts, and Core Capacity program, involves a multi-year, 
multi-step process that project sponsors must complete before a project 
is eligible for funding. The steps in the process and the basic 
requirements of the program can be found on FTA's Web site at 
www.fta.dot.gov.
    Since FTA approval of the Draft EIS on March 3, 2015, HRT has re-
examined funding options and elected to not pursue the CIG program or 
other Federal transportation funding. Therefore, FTA is rescinding the 
August 14, 2013 NOI.
    Comments and questions concerning this notice should be directed to 
FTA at the address provided above.

Terry Garcia Crews,
Regional Administrator, FTA Region III.
[FR Doc. 2016-02200 Filed 2-4-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.1


                    PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION


In  connection  with the Annual  Report on Form 10-K of Data  Systems & Software
Inc. (the  "Company")  for the period ended  December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  the  undersigned,  George
Morgenstern,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

       1.  the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
           15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       2.  the  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
           material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
           of the Company.

Dated:  April 14, 2005


                                   /s/ George Morgenstern
                                   --------------------------------------------
                                   George Morgenstern, Chief Executive Officer
                                   (Principal Executive Officer)