alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 235 (Thursday, December 7, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62878-62879]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-29849]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[CO-030-06-1610-00-1784]

Southwest Colorado Resource Advisory Council Meeting
agency: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
action: Notice; Resource Advisory Council Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

summary: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 USC), 
notice is hereby given that the Southwest Colorado Resource Advisory 
Council will meet on Thursday, January 11, 1996, at the Anasazi 
Heritage Center near Dolores, Colorado.
dates: The meeting is scheduled for Thursday, January 11, 1996.
addresses: For further information, contact Roger Alexander, Bureau of 
Land Management (BLM), Montrose District Office, 2465 South Townsend 
Avenue, Montrose, Colorado 81401; Telephone (970) 249-7791; TDD (970)-
249-4639.

supplementary information: The meeting is scheduled to begin at 9:00 
a.m. at the Anasazi Heritage Center, 27501 Highway 184, Dolores, 
Colorado. 

[[Page 62879]]
The agenda, which includes a tour of the Heritage Center, will focus on 
the development of standards for rangeland health and guidelines for 
livestock grazing.
    All resource Advisory Council meetings are open to the public. 
Interested persons may make oral statements to the Council, or written 
statements may be submitted for the Council's consideration. Depending 
on the number of persons wishing to make oral statements, a per-person 
time limit may be established by the Montrose District Manager.
    Summary minutes for the Council meeting will be maintained in the 
Montrose District Office and will be available for public inspection 
and reproduction during regular business hours within thirty (30) days 
following the meeting.

    Dated: November 29, 1995.
Mark W. Stiles,
District Manager.
[FR Doc. 95-29849 Filed 12-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-M
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual Balance 

in 75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

-2.00% -4.34% 0.28% 0.16% -1.72% -4.18%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2009 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary, Social Security

August 26, 2009

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Taxation of Benefits

Proposed Provision: Tax Social Security benefits in a manner similar to private pension income beginning 

in 2010. Phase out the lower-income thresholds during 2010-2019.

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this provision

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Year

Percent

Cost rates with this provision

Cost rates under present law

Income rates with this provision

Income rates under present law

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

 (assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Year

Percent

Present law With this provision
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 249 (Thursday, December 28, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 67162]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31467]



      


                Sunshine Act Meetings



Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 249 / Thursday, December 28, 1995 / 
Sunshine Act Meetings

[[Page 67162]]




NOTIFICATION OF ITEMS ADDED TO AGENDA

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD
    At the Board's meeting on December 20, 1995, the Board voted 
unanimously to add three items to the agenda:

1. Furlough;
2. Congressional Correspondence; and
3. Truth in Budgeting.

    In so voting, the Board determined that agency business required 
these changes and that advance notice was not possible.

    Date: December 21, 1995.
Beatrice Ezerski,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 95-31467 Filed 12-26-95; 9:56 am]

BILLING CODE 7905-01-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0581

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

CATHERINE MARIE RYMAL,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including March 30, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 22 2022

02/22/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0581
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Florida Banks, Inc.
(the  "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the "Form  10-Q"),  I, Charles E.
Hughes,  Jr., Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The  information  contained  in the Form 10-Q fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


                                                    /s/ Charles E. Hughes, Jr.
                                                    --------------------------
                                                    Charles E. Hughes, Jr.
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                                    August 14, 2002
#### BLAKE H. GARRISON, By His Next Friend, A. J. Garrison, v. GRIGSBY & COMPANY et al.

(Filed 21 December, 1927.)

Appeal by defendants from *Sink, Special Judge,*at August Special Term, 1927, of BuNcombe.

Civil action to recover damages for an alleged negligent injury, tried upon tbe following issues:

*823“1. "Was tbe plaintiff injured by tbe negligence of tbe defendants, as alleged in tbe complaint? Answer: Yes.

*“2.*Did tbe plaintiff by bis own negligence contribute to bis injuries, as alleged in tbe answer? Answer: No.

“3. Was tbe plaintiff injured by tbe negligence of a fellow-servant, as alleged in tbe answer? Answer: No.

“4. Wbat damages is tbe plaintiff entitled to recover? Answer: $2,000.”

Judgment on tbe verdict for plaintiff, from wbicb tbe defendants appeal.

*Roberts, Young & Lene for plaintiff.*

*B. R. Reynolds and I. W. Cashati for defendants.*

Pee CueiaM.

There is no exceptive assignment of error appearing on *the*record wbicb requires, or would warrant, any interference with tbe verdict and judgment rendered in tbe Superior Court. Tbey will, therefore, be upheld.

No error.
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Cost-of-Living Adjustment | Description of Proposed Provision:      Starting with the December 2012 cost-of-living adjustment (COLA), compute the COLA using a chained version of the consumer price index for wage and salary workers (CPI-W).  This new computation is estimated to result in an annual COLA that is 0.3 percentage point less, on average.  The new COLA would not apply to DI benefits and would apply for all OASI benefits, except for those who are converted from disabled worker to retired worker status. |
|---------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                           |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2009 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified September 28, 2010 |
No. 17,928.

#### Arthur L. Allen, etc. *v.*Sterling P. Crouch, et al.

(307 P. [2d] 815)

Decided February 25, 1957.

Messrs. Bellinger & Faricy, for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. Phelps, Fonda & Hays, for defendants in error.

*604*In Department.*

Mr. Justice Knauss

delivered the opinion of the Court.

We will refer to the parties as they appeared in the trial court where plaintiff in error was plaintiff and defendants in error were defendants. Plaintiff’s action was one to recover $1,275.38 damages on account of admitted negligence on the part of defendants’ driver in running into the rear left end of plaintiff’s car with a vehicle belonging to defendants. The sole issue submitted was the amount of plaintiff’s damages and the jury returned its verdict in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $450.00. Judgment was entered on the verdict and plaintiff brings the case here on writ of error, claiming that the trial court erred in not entering judgment notwithstanding the verdict in his favor in the sum of $1,275.38.

It is argued that the evidence is undisputed that the difference between the value of plaintiff’s automobile before and after the accident entitled plaintiff to a judgment in the sum of $1,275.38. Not so. The case was submitted- to the jury, under, instructions not here complained of by plaintiff-and as we read this record we are •convinced that the question óf damages' was a matter to be determined by the jury as-a fact finding body, and it will not be disturbed. -• vf"

We do not agree that there is undisputed competent evidence in this record upon which a verdict of $1,275.38 could be returned by a conscientious jury. No cross-error is assigned by defendants. We mention this because certain tendered evidence on behalf of defendants was, as we deem it, improperly rejected by the trial court.

The plaintiff treads on dangerous ground in complaining of the amount of the verdict of the jury when, as here, much of the pertinent evidence concerning the cost of repairs and the subsequent sale of plaintiff’s car was, we think, erroneously rejected by the trial court. •

*605From this record it appears that the jury was reasonably liberal in its award. The judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice Moore, Mr. Justice Sutton and Mr. Justice Day concur.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Aytu BioScience,
Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of Joshua R. Disbrow, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer),
and Gregory A. Gould, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer), of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his
knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated: October 19, 2017                                                                | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                                                                                       | 
|/s/ Joshua R. Disbrow                                                                  | 
|Joshua R. Disbrow                                                                      | 
|Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)                                  | 
|                                                                                       | 
|/s/ Gregory A. Gould                                                                   | 
|Gregory A. Gould                                                                       | 
|Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
## Detailed Single Year Tables

- Individual Provisions
- Family Members

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						D9: Provide for pro-rata benefit payment for the month of death of a beneficiary, rather than no payment for month of death. For situations where an auxiliary beneficiary is changed from one type of benefit to another upon the death of the worker, benefits for the month of the worker's death would be determined on a pro-rata basis. This provision would apply for deaths in 2024 or later.**

### Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program

### Summarized Estimates
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


        <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                           <C>
PERIOD-TYPE>                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>         	             JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           83
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   	 5
<ALLOWANCES>                	                     0
<INVENTORY>                                	      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 	              395
<PP&E>                                           	0
<DEPRECIATION>                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          	     4,015
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            28
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      	      0
<PREFERRED>                                   2,390
<COMMON>                                      1,773
<OTHER-SE>                                	   3,985
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              	   4,015
<SALES>                                        	141
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               	141
<CGS>                                            23
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    23
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                	(82)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (82)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              	2,250
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                 	2,168
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>    	                             (.00)


23



1


38



F-14


3




</TABLE>
### Proposed Provision: G5. Invest 15 percent of the OASI and DI Trust Fund reserves in equities (phased in 2024-2033), assuming an ultimate 2.3 percent annual real rate of return on equities. Thus, the ultimate rate of return on equities is the same as that assumed for Trust Fund bonds.

back
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       2,715,465               5,064,737
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,334,752               3,548,494
<ALLOWANCES>                                   195,000                 125,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,970,359               9,912,513
<PP&E>                                     309,000,565             690,235,675
<DEPRECIATION>                              15,223,593              49,524,939
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             311,989,514             665,277,330
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      298,269,736              24,777,034
<BONDS>                                    290,170,858             442,094,869
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           378                  32,026
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,968,360             198,137,429
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               311,999,514             665,277,330
<SALES>                                     12,544,096              25,756,967
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,544,096              25,756,967
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,530,987               4,827,407
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            11,446,336              33,176,383
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,550,342               8,240,059
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (13,139,161)            (23,474,516)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (13,139,161)            (23,474,516)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                              (13,139,161)            (23,474,516)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (34.24)                  (1.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 248 (Wednesday, December 27, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 67021]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31394]






UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE BOARD OF GOVERNORS

Notice of a Meeting

    The Board of Governors of the United States Postal Service, 
pursuant to its Bylaws (39 C.F.R. Section 7.5) and the Government in 
the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. Section 552b), hereby gives notice that it 
intends to hold a meeting at 8:30 a.m. on Tuesday, January 9, 1996, in 
Washington, D.C. The meeting is open to the public and will be held at 
the U.S. Postal Service Headquarters, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, S.W., in the 
Benjamin Franklin Room. The Board expects to discuss the matters stated 
in the agenda which is set forth below. Requests for information about 
the meeting should be addressed to the Secretary for the Board, David 
F. Harris, at (202) 268-4800.
    There will also be a session of the Board on Monday, January 8, 
1996, but it will consist entirely of briefings and is not open to the 
public.

AGENDA

Tuesday Session

January 9--8:30 a.m. (Open)

    1. Minutes of the Previous Meeting, December 4-5, 1995.
    2. Remarks of the Postmaster General and CEO. (Marvin Runyon)
    3. Consideration of Board Resolution on Capital Funding. 
(Chairman Sam Winters)
    4. Annual Report on Government in the Sunshine Act Compliance. 
(Secretary to the Board Koerber)
    5. Postmaster General's FY 1995 Annual Report. (Larry M. 
Speakes, Senior Vice President, Corporate and Legislative Affairs)
    6. Annual 1995 Comprehensive Statement on Postal Operations to 
Congress. (Larry M. Speakes, Senior Vice President, Corporate and 
Legislative Affairs)
    7. Capital Investments. (All for final consideration)
    a. Tray Management System--Phase II Development. (William J. 
Dowling, Vice President, Engineer).
    b. Low Cost Optical Character Reader. (Mr. Dowling).
    c. 47 Small Parcel and Bundle Sorters. (Mr. Dowling).
    d. Associate Office Infrastructure R&D. (Richard D. Weirich, 
Vice President, Information Systems).
    e. Jacksonville, Florida, Bulk Mail Center Expansion. (Rudolph 
K. Umscheid, Vice President, Facilities).
    8. Election of Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Board of 
Governors.
    9. Tentative Agenda for the February 5-6, 1996, meeting in 
Houston, Texas.
David F. Harris,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95-31394 Filed 12-22-95; 1:22 pm]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-M
#### THE TEXAS COMPANY v. L. S. BYRUM, Trading as TRIANGLE FILLING STATION.

(Filed 14 September, 1927.)

Appeal by defendant from an order of *Clayton Moore, Special Judge,*made 22 June, 1927. From OhowaN.

*W. D. Pruden for plaintiff.*

*■Ehringhaus & Hall and H. B. Leary for defendant.*

Per • Curiam.

This is an application for a restraining order to prevent tbe defendant from removing from tbe premises described in tbe pleadings certain property and equipment and from refusing to deal in tbe plaintiff’s products. Tbe plaintiff alleges tbat on 11 April, 1923, it leased from Sessoms and Wood a certain lot in Edenton for a term of three years from 1 May, 1923, and thereafter from year to year not exceeding two years, subject to termination by tbe lessee at tbe end of tbe original term, or any subsequent period by a written notice of thirty days; tbat at tbe same time tbe parties entered into a license agreement by wbicb tbe plaintiff permitted Sessoms & Wood to occupy tbe premises upon agreed terms, and tbat tbe defendant succeeded to tbe rights of Sessoms & Wood. It is further alleged by tbe plaintiff tbat tbe defendant thereafter executed ¿nd submitted to it a proposed lease for a term of ten years from 1 May, 1926, wbicb, after acceptance, was duly registered, and tbat tbe defendant in disregard thereof afterwards notified tbe plaintiff tbat it was bis purpose to sever tbe contractual rela*790tion between them and to move the plaintiff’s property from the premises. The defendant denied the execution of the ten-year lease and alleged that his only agreement with the plaintiff expired on 1 May, 1928.

The restraining order was continued and the defendant appealed. In this we think there was no error. The correspondence, exhibits and affidavits are not sufficiently definite for us to determine therefrom that the defendant is entitled -as a matter of law to have the restraining order dissolved. The judgment is

Affirmed.