Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 27 / Thursday, February 9, 1995 / Notices 7751

Department Clearance Officer, USDA,

OIRM, Room 404–W Admin. Bldg.,

Washington, D.C. 20250; (202) 690–

2118.

Revision

• Food and Consumer Services

Model Food Stamps, Periodic Reporting,

Notice of Late Incomplete Reporting,

Adequate Notice, Sponsored Aliens,

Duplication Participation, and

Disqualified Recipient Report

FCS–385, 386, 387, 394, 441, 442

Individuals or households; State, local

or tribal government; 111,008,185

responses; 36,964,654 hours

Patricia Maggi (703) 305–2468

• Agricultual Marketing Service

Reporting and Recordkeeping

Requirements for 7 CFR Part 29

Forms TB–87 and TB–92

Business or other for-profit; 13,414

responses; 5,569 hours

Larry L. Crabtree (202) 205–0101

Extension

• Federal Crop Insurance Corporation

Field Inspection And Claim For

Indemnity

FCI–74, FCI–74 T–P–C, FCI–63 Citrus,

and FCI–63 Raisin

Individuals or households; Farms;

40,000 responses; 10,000 hours

Bonnie L. Hart (202) 254–8393

New Collection

• Animal & Plant Health Inspection

Service

Exotic Newcastle Disease in Birds and

Poultry; Chlamydiosis in Poultry

Individuals or households; Business or

other for-profit; Farms; State, Local or

Tribal Government; 45 responses; 21

hours

Dr. Christopher M. Groocock (301) 436–

8240

• Food Safety and Inspection Service

Pathogen Reduction; Hazard Analysis

and Critical Control Points (HACCP)

Systems

Business or other for-profit; 10,662

responses; 14,371,901 hours

Lee Puricelli (202) 720–7163

Donald E. Hulcher,

Deputy Departmental Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. 95–3284 Filed 2–8–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410–01–M

COMMISSION ON IMMIGRATION

REFORM

Washington, D.C. Consultations

AGENCY: U.S. Commission on

Immigration Reform.

ACTION: Announcement of commission

consultations.

This notice announces consultations

to be held by the U.S. Commission on

Immigration Reform in Washington, DC

on February 23 and February 24, 1995.

The Commission, created by Section

141 of the Immigration Act of 1990, is

mandated to review the implementation

and impact of U.S. immigration policy

and report its findings to Congress. An

interim report, U.S. Immigration Policy:

Restoring Credibility, was issued on

September 30, 1994; the final report is

due in 1997.

The consultation participants will

include the Commissioners, researchers,

government officials, representatives of

business, labor, community, ethnic, and

religious organizations, and other

interested parties. Panels on the first

day will examine labor market and

employment-based immigration issues.

The Commission seeks to gain greater

understanding of the effects of legal

immigration on the labor market, the

objectives and priorities for permanent

and temporary workers and procedures

for testing the labor market. Panels on

the second day will focus on family

reunification, including admission

priorities, categories, numbers, backlogs,

and likely future trends. Policies to be

examined include the criteria used for

determining who qualifies for family

reunification and its impact on U.S.

society and economy.

Date: February 23, 1995.

Time: 9:00 am–12:00 pm (Legal

Immigration and the Labor Market); 2:00 pm–

5:00 pm (Temporary Workers, Labor

Certification and other means of Testing the

Labor market).

Date: February 24, 1995.

Time: 9:00 am–1:00 pm (Family

Reunification).

Address: Room 2226, Rayburn House

Office Building, Independence Avenue and

South Capitol Street, SW., Washington, DC.

For Further Information: Paul Donnelly

(202) 673–5348.

Dated: February 2, 1995.

Susan Martin,

Executive Director.

[FR Doc. 95–3166 Filed 2–8–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820–97–M

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A–570–830]

Notice of Antidumping Order:

Coumarin From the People’s Republic

of China

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 9, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

David J. Goldberger or Louis Apple,

Office of Antidumping Investigations,

Import Administration, International

Trade Administration, U.S. Department

of Commerce, 14th Street and

Constitution Avenue, N.W.,

Washington, D.C. 20230; telephone:

(202) 482–4136 or (202) 482–1769,

respectively.

Scope of Order

The product covered by this order is

coumarin. Coumarin is an aroma

chemical with the chemical formula

C9H6O2 that is also known by other

names, including 2H–1-benzopyran-2-

one, 1,2-benzopyrone, cis-o-coumaric

acid lactone, coumarinic anhydride, 2–

Oxo-1,2-benzopyran, 5,6-benzo-alphapyrone, ortho-hydroxyc innamic acid

lactone, cis-ortho-coumaric acid

anhydride, and tonka bean camphor.

All forms and variations of coumarin

are included within the scope of the

order, such as coumarin in crystal, flake,

or powder form, and ‘‘crude’’ or

unrefined coumarin (i.e. prior to

purification or crystallization).

Excluded from the scope of this order

are ethylcoumarins (C11H10O2) and

methylcoumarins (C10H8O2). Coumarin

is classifiable under subheading

2932.21.0000 of the Harmonized Tariff

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).

Although the HTSUS subheading is

provided for convenience and customs

purposes, our written description of the

scope of this investigation is dispositive.

Antidumping Duty Order

In accordance with sections 735(a) of

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the

Act’’), the Department of Commerce

(‘‘the Department’’) made its final

determination that coumarin from the

People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) is

being sold at less than fair value (59 FR

66895, December 28, 1994). On

February 1, 1995, the International

Trade Commission (ITC) notified the

Department of its final determination,

pursuant to section 735(b)(1)(A)(i) of the

Act, that an industry in the United

States is materially injured by reason of

imports of the subject merchandise from

the PRC.

In addition, three ITC Commissioners

found that critical circumstances exist

with regard to such products, and three

Commissioners found that critical

circumstances do not exist with regard

to such imports from the PRC. The

Commissioners do not agree as to

whether three votes constitute an

affirmative critical circumstances

determination. There is no definition of

or limitation on the meaning of the term

‘‘determination’’ in the statute or