8222 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 29 / Monday, February 13, 1995 / Notices

(H) Article 15 Loans

The Department has conducted this

review in accordance with section

751(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as

amended (the Act).

Scope of Review

Imports covered by this review are

shipments of Mexican leather wearing

apparel. These products include leather

coats and jackets for men, boys, women,

girls, and infants, and other leather

apparel products including leather

vests, pants, and shorts. Also included

are outer leather shells and parts and

pieces of leather wearing apparel. This

merchandise is currently classifiable

under Harmonized Tariff Schedule

(HTS) item numbers 4203.10.4030,

4203.10.4060, 4203.10.4085 and

4203.10.4095. The HTS item numbers

are provided for convenience and

Customs purposes. The written

description remains dispositive.

The review covers the period January

1, 1994 through September 30, 1994 and

eight programs.

Applicable Statute and Regulations

Unless otherwise indicated, all

citations to the Act and to the

Department’s regulations are in

reference to the provisions as they

existed on December 31, 1994.

Preliminary Results of Review

As a result of this review, we

preliminarily determine that, during the

first three quarters of 1994, MPP and

Finapiel did not receive any benefits

from the programs examined in the last

administrative review of this order.

Therefore, if the final results remain the

same as these preliminary results, the

Department will instruct the Customs

Service to collect zero cash deposits of

estimated countervailing duties, as

provided by the Act, on shipments of

Mexican leather wearing apparel from

MPP and Finapiel exported on or after

the date of publication of the final

results of this review .

Interested parties may request a

hearing not later than 10 days after the

date of publication of this notice (See 19

CFR 355.38(b)). Interested parties may

submit written arguments in case briefs

on these preliminary results within 30

days of the date of publication. Rebuttal

briefs, limited to arguments raised in

case briefs, may be submitted seven

days after the time limit for filing the

case brief. Any hearing, if requested,

will be held after the scheduled date for

submission of rebuttal briefs. Copies of

case briefs and rebuttal briefs must be

served on interested parties in

accordance with section 355.38(e) of the

Commerce regulations.

Representatives of parties to the

proceeding may request disclosure of

proprietary information under

administrative protective order no later

than 10 days after the representative’s

client or employer becomes a party to

the proceeding, but in no event later

than the date the case briefs are due (See

19 CFR 355.34(b)(1)(iii)).

The Department will publish the final

results of this changed circumstances

administrative review including the

results of its analysis of issues raised in

any case or rebuttal brief.

This changed circumstances

administrative review and notice are in

accordance with section 751(b)(1) of the

Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(b)(1)) and 19 CFR

355.22(h).

Dated: February 7, 1995.

Susan G. Esserman,

Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 95–3662 Filed 2–10–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND

COMMUNITY SERVICE

Information Collection Request

Submitted to the Office of Management

and Budget for Review

AGENCY: The Corporation for National

and Community Service (CNS).

ACTION: Information Collection Request

Submitted to the Office of Management

and Budget (OMB) for Review.

SUMMARY: This notice provides

information about an information

proposal by CNS, currently under

review by OMB.

DATES: OMB and CNS will consider

comments on the proposed collection of

information and record keeping

requirements received within 10 days

from the date of publication. Copies of

the proposed forms and supporting

documents may be obtained by

contacting CNS.

ADDRESSES: Send comment to both:

Chuck Helfer Study Director, CNS, 1201

New York Ave., NW., Washington DC

20525

Daniel Chenock, Desk Officer, OMB,

3002 NEOB, Washington, DC 20503

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Chuck Helfer, (202) 606–5000, extension

248.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Office of the Corporation for National

and Community Service Issuing

Proposal: Office of Evaluation

Title of Form: Learn and Serve

America—Higher Education Annual

Accomplishments Survey and

Community Impact Survey

Need and Use: The National and

Community Service Trust Act of 1993

(Pub. L. 103–82) requires the

Corporation for National Service to

evaluate its programs on a regular

basis. This information is required for

program management, planning, and

required record keeping

Type of Request: Submission of a new

collection

Respondents Obligation to Reply:

Voluntary

Frequency of Collection: Once each year

for three years

Estimated Number of Responses: 1,250

Average Burden Hours per Response:

.51 hours

Estimated Annual Reporting or

Disclosure Burden: 637.5 hours

Regulatory Authority: Public Law 103–

82

Dated: February 7, 1995.

Lance Potter,

Director, Office of Evaluation.

[FR Doc. 95–3548 Filed 2–10–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6050–28–M

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

Defense Science Board Task Force on

Joint Technology Issues

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee

Meetings.

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board

Task Force on Joint Technology Issues

will meet in closed session on March 2–

3, 1995 at the Pentagon, Arlington,

Virginia.

The mission of the Defense Science

Board is to advise the Secretary of

Defense through the Under Secretary of

Defense for Acquisition and Technology

on scientific and technical matters as

they affect the perceived needs of the

Department of Defense. At this meeting

the Task Force will work with the JCS

Chairman and Vice Chairman in support

of the Expanded JROC activities. The

Task Force should place special

emphasis on the application of

technology to enhance the effectiveness

of the evolving force structure within

tight fiscal constraints and should also

place a special focus on issues dealing

with operations other than war.

In accordance with Section 10(d) of

the Federal Advisory Committee Act,

P.L. No. 92–463, as amended (5 U.S.C.

App. II, (1988)), it has been determined

that this DSB Task Force meeting,

concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C.

552b(c)(1) (1988), and that accordingly
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 29 / Monday, February 13, 1995 / Notices 8223

this meeting will be closed to the

public.

Dated: February 7, 1995.

Patricia L. Toppings,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison

Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 95–3452 Filed 2–10–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5000–04–M

Defense Science Board Task Force on

Theater Missile Defense (TMD)

ACTION: Change in Date/Location of

Advisory Committee Meeting Notice.

SUMMARY: The meeting of the Defense

Science Board Task Force on Theater

Missile Defense (TMD) scheduled for

February 1–2, 1995 at the Pentagon,

Arlington, Virginia, as published in the

Federal Register (Vol. 60, No. 19, Page

5656, Monday, January 30, 1995, FR

Doc. 95–2195) will be held on February

13–14, 1995 at Science Applications

International Corporation (SAIC),

McLean, Virginia.

Dated: February 7, 1995.

Patricia L. Toppings,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison

Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 95–3453 Filed 2–10–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5000–04–M

Defense Science Board Task Force on

Quality of Life

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee

Meeting.

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board

Task Force on Quality of Life will meet

in open session on February 27–28,

1995 at the Hyatt Arlington at Key

Bridge, Arlington, Virginia.

The mission of the Defense Science

Board is to advise the Secretary of

Defense and the Under Secretary of

Defense for Acquisition on scientific

and technical matters as they affect the

perceived needs of the Department of

Defense.

Persons interested in further

information should call LtCol Dave

Witkowski at (703) 697–7192.

Dated: February 7, 1995.

Patricia L. Toppings,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison

Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 95–3454 Filed 2–10–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5000–04–M

Department of the Army

Yakima Training Center Cultural and

Natural Resources Committee—

Technical Committee

AGENCY: HQ, I CORPS & Fort Lewis,

DOD.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of

the Federal Advisory Committee Act

(Pub. L. 92–463), announcement is

made of the following committee

meeting:

Name of Committee: Yakima Training

Center Cultural and Natural Resources

Committee—Technical Committee.

Date of Meeting: March 9, 1995.

Place: Yakima Training Center, Building

266, Yakima, Washington.

Time: 1:00 p.m.

Proposed Agenda: Cultural and Natural

Resources Management Plan development.

All proceedings are open. For future

information contact Stephen Hart, Chief,

Civil Law, (206) 967–4540.

Kenneth L. Denton,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 95–3552 Filed 2–10–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710–08–M

Yakima Training Center Cultural and

Natural Resources Committee—

Technical Committee

AGENCY: HQ, I CORPS & Fort Lewis,

DOD.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of

the Federal Advisory Committee Act

(Pub. L. 92–463), announcement is

made of the following committee

meeting:

Name of Committee: Yakima Training

Center Cultural and Natural Resources

Committee—Technical Committee.

Date of Meeting: March 16, 1995.

Place: Yakima Training Center, Building

266, Yakima, Washington.

Time: 1:00 p.m.

Proposed Agenda: Cultural and Natural

Resources Management Plan development.

All proceedings are open. For further

information contact Stephen Hart, Chief,

Civil Law, (206) 967–4540.

Kenneth L. Denton,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 95–3551 Filed 2–10–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710–08–M

Corps of Engineers

Intent To Prepare a Draft

Environmental Impact Statement

(DEIS) for Dredged Material Placement

at Duluth-Superior Harbor, Minnesota

and Wisconsin

AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,

DOD.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of

Engineers, Detroit District, is evaluating

the environmental impacts of dredged

material placement alternatives for

maintenance dredging at DuluthSuperior Harbor, Minnesota and

Wisconsin. The Federal navigation

project includes 17 miles of navigation

channels, anchorage areas, and

maneuvering basins, with channel

depths ranging from 20 to 27 feet.

Existing dredged material placement

sites have insufficient capacity for

future maintenance dredging needs.

Alternatives under consideration for

future dredged material placement

include expansion of the existing Erie

Pier Confined Disposal Facility (CDF) by

increasing the dike heights, other diked

in-water facilities, upland placement,

habitat creation, and open water

disposal. The no Federal action

alternative will also be considered.

ADDRESSES: U.S. Army Corps of

Engineers, Army Engineer District,

Detroit, Environmental Analysis Branch,

P.O. Box 1027; Detroit, Michigan

48231–1027.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Duluth-Superior Harbor is located at the

western end of Lake Superior between

Duluth, Minnesota, and Superior,

Wisconsin. The harbor is formed by the

waters of the St. Louis River, the second

largest tributary of Lake Superior.

Approximately 113 docks or terminals

at Duluth-Superior Harbor handle a

variety of commodities including iron

ore, coal, limestone, petroleum, steel

and scrap iron, cement, general cargo,

and grain.

Maintenance dredging for the Federal

project averages about 150,000 yards per

year. Much of the dredged material is

placed in the Erie Pier CDF, which is

located on approximately 82 acres along

the northwest shore of Duluth-Superior

Harbor. The CDF was constructed in

1979 to hold up to one million cubic

yards of material dredged from the

Federal navigation project over a 10 year

period. Clean sand dredged from the

outer parts of the harbor is generally

used for beach nourishment to mitigate

the affects of beach erosion along the

lake.