alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3825 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3825

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 3903 Melear Drive in Arlington, Texas, as the ``Ron Wright Post 
                           Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 14, 2022

  Mr. Cornyn introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 3903 Melear Drive in Arlington, Texas, as the ``Ron Wright Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RON WRIGHT POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 3903 Melear Drive in Arlington, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Ron Wright Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Ron Wright 
Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

       CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NASB Financial, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, David H. Hancock, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.


August 8, 2008             By: /s/ David H. Hancock
                               David H. Hancock
                               Chairman and Chief
                                 Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to NASB Financial, Inc. and will be retained by NASB
Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.


This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein , and not for
any other purpose.

<Page>
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-13-00466-CR

____________________

ANDRE ALEXANDRE SMITH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

_________________________________ ______________________ 

On Appeal from the 252nd District Court 

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 13-16032 

____________________________________________ ____________ 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, Andre Alexandre Smith pleaded guilty 

to burglary of a habitation. The trial court found the evidence sufficient to 

substantiate Smith’s guilt, deferred further proceedings, and placed Smith on 

community supervision for five years. The State later filed a motion to revoke 

Smith’s community supervision, alleging two violations of the conditions of his 

community supervision. Smith pleaded “true” to Count II and, after hearing 

evidence, the trial court found the evidence to be sufficient to find Count I to be 
2

true. The trial court found that Smith violated the conditions of his community 

supervision, adjudicated Smith’s guilt for burglary of a habitation, revoked Smith’s 

community supervision, and sentenced Smith to nineteen years in prison. 

Smith’s appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel’s professional 

evaluation of the record and concludes Smith’s appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 

1978). We granted an extension of time for Smith to file a pro se brief, but we 

received no response from Smith. We have determined that Smith’s appeal is

wholly frivolous. We have independently examined the clerk’s record and the 

reporter’s record, and we agree that no arguable issues support the appeal. We find 

it unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. 

Compare Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We 

affirm the trial court’s judgment.1

AFFIRMED.

 ________________________________

 STEVE McKEITHEN 

 Chief Justice

Submitted on April 30, 2014

Opinion Delivered June 25, 2014

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.

 1

Smith may challenge our decision by filing a petition for discretionary 

review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.
#### VIRGINIA N. NOWELL v. J. WALTER NEAL and ALFRED T. HAMILTON.

(Filed 23 November, 1955.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *Huskins, Special J.,*May Term, 1955, of Ware.

Civil action for damages on account of personal injuries, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of defendants, physicians and surgeons, in advising, and in the performance of, an operation, and in failure to render proper post-operation care.

During the progress of the trial, judgment of voluntary nonsuit was entered as to defendant Hamilton.

The court overruled motions for judgment of involuntary nonsuit as to defendant Neal. The first issue submitted to the jury was: “1. Was the plaintiff injured by the negligence of the defendant, Dr. J. Walter Neal, as alleged in the Complaint?” The jury answered this issue “No,” and therefore did not consider the issue relating to damages.

Judgment in favor of defendant Neal was entered in accordance with the jury’s verdict. Plaintiff excepted and appealed, the principal assignments of error relating to rulings as to the admission and exclusion of evidence and to the court’s instructions to the jury.

*Vaughan S. Winborne, John A. Robertson, and Samuel Pretlow Win-borne for plaintiff, appellant.*

*Smith, Leach, Anderson & Dorsett for defendant, appellee.*

PER Cueiam.

After a protracted trial, involving the consideration of voluminous testimony, the jury resolved the controversial (first) issue in favor of defendant Neal. Careful consideration of plaintiff’s assignments of error, brought forward and argued in the brief filed in her behalf, discloses no error of law deemed of sufficient prejudicial effect to warrant a new trial. Hence, the verdict and judgment will not be disturbed.

No error.
No. 1321, Misc.

#### Gregory *v.*United States.

Motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus and for other relief denied.
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 9, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 6843]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02513]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Meeting of the U.S. Naval Academy Board of Visitors

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of partially closed meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Naval Academy Board of Visitors will meet to make 
such inquiry, as the Board shall deem necessary, into the state of 
morale and discipline, the curriculum, instruction, physical equipment, 
fiscal affairs, and academic methods of the Naval Academy. The 
executive session of this meeting from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. on 
March 21, 2016, will include discussions of new and pending 
administrative/minor disciplinary infractions and non-judicial 
punishment proceedings involving midshipmen attending the Naval Academy 
to include but not limited to individual honor/conduct violations 
within the Brigade; the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. For this reason, the 
executive session of this meeting will be closed to the public.

DATES: The open session of the meeting will be held on March 21, 2016, 
from 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. The executive session held from 11:00 a.m. 
to 12:00 p.m. will be the closed portion of the meeting.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the U.S. Naval Academy, 
Annapolis, MD. The meeting will be handicap accessible.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant Commander Eric Madonia, 
USN, Executive Secretary to the Board of Visitors, Office of the 
Superintendent, U.S. Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD 21402-5000, 410 293-
1503.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice of meeting is provided per the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.). The 
executive session of the meeting from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. on March 
21, 2016, will consist of discussions of new and pending 
administrative/minor disciplinary infractions and non-judicial 
punishments involving midshipmen attending the Naval Academy to include 
but not limited to, individual honor/conduct violations within the 
Brigade. The discussion of such information cannot be adequately 
segregated from other topics, which precludes opening the executive 
session of this meeting to the public. Accordingly, the Department of 
the Navy/Assistant for Administration has determined in writing that 
the meeting shall be partially closed to the public because the 
discussions during the executive session from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. 
will be concerned with matters protected under sections 552b(c)(5), 
(6), and (7) of title 5, United States Code.

    (Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b)

    Dated: February 3, 2016.
N.A. Hagerty-Ford,
Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register 
Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016-02513 Filed 2-8-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Food Animal Environmental Systems Research: Bowling Green, KY
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Models & Software
                        Sorption Isotherm Spreadsheets
                                    Annual Phosphorus Loss Estimator (APLE) Model
                                    Modified Arcsine Log Calibration Curve (ALCC)Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Bowling Green, Kentucky Food Animal Environmental Systems Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Research Programs and Projects at this LocationARS research is organized into National Programs. Within each National Program are research projects. Listed below are  the National Programs and research projects currently conducted at this location.
Clicking on a National Program (NP) will take you  to the main ARS site for more information on the program. Clicking on a research  project title will take you to more information on the project.  Current View: All Projects   Show All Projects ||
         Appropriated Projects Only


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-18-0000900 13-AUG-2019 08:52 AM
<page>
  									            EXHIBIT 32.02


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Dean Witter Global
Perspective Portfolio L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for
the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I,
Kevin Perry, Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management
Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.










By:	  /s/	Kevin Perry

Name:		Kevin Perry
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		March 31, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 36 (Thursday, February 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10075-10076]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4357]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-160-000]


Texas Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

February 16, 1995.
    Take notice that on February 13, 1995, Texas Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Texas Gas) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheet, with 
an effective date of March 15, 1995:

Second Revised First Revised Sheet No. 230

    Texas Gas herein modifies Section 33.3(f) of its General Terms and 
Conditions in order to clarify the original intent of this provision, 
while complying with the Commission's interpretation and rulings as 
stated in its January 27, 1995, Order.
    Texas Gas states that copies of the revised tariff sheets are being 
mailed to Texas Gas's jurisdictional customers and interested state 
commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, DC 
20426, in accordance with Secs. 385.211 and 385.214 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests should be filed on 
or before February 24, 1995. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are 
[[Page 10076]] available for public inspection in the Public Reference 
Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-4357 Filed 2-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 97-09-0208-CRA, f iled in the 218th Judicial District Court, Atascosa County, Texas, the Honorable Stella H. Saxon presiding. However, the ch allenged order was signed by the Honorable Donna Rayes, presiding judge of the 81st Judici al District Court, Atascosa County, Texas. iii i i i



### MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-08-00611-CR IN RE Michael GOMEZ Original Mandamus Proceeding 1 PER CURIAM Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice Delivered and Filed: September 17, 2008 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED On August 13, 2008, relator Michael Gomez file d a petition for writ of mandamus, seeking to compel the trial court to correct the judgment in the underlying criminal matter to reflect additional presentence jail time credit. On Augus t 21, 2008, this court requested the State file a response to relator’s petition. On September 5, 2008, the State filed a res ponse, agreeing that relator is entitled to additional presentence jail time credit. The State further informed this Court that the trial court issued a Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc on September 4, 2008. The judgment states, “It appears to the Court that the order entered in the above entitled cause on November 14, 2006 is incorrect as it04-08-00623-CR

-2- appears on the minutes of the Court . . . . It fu rther appears that the foregoing omission occurred because of an oversight.” The judgment then orde rs that the original judgment reflect the following time to be credited to relator’s sentence: Ju ly 29, 1997 to August 12, 1997; July 12, 2003 to October 24, 2003; December 29, 2003 to December 30, 2003; and December 20, 2005 to October 26, 2006. Because relator has been granted the relief he s ought, his petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed as moot. PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 0.98 1.18 27% 27%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

September 15, 2023

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable)

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: E3.17. Beginning in 2025, increase the taxable maximum by twice the rate of 

increase in the national Average Wage Index, but never by less than 3 percent. Provide benefit credit for 

earnings up to the revised taxable maximum levels.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

22.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual Balance 

in 75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

-2.00% -4.34% 0.46% 0.72% -1.54% -3.62%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2009 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary, Social Security

August 26, 2009

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Level of Monthly Benefits (PIA)

Proposed Provision: Increase the number of years used to calculate benefits for retirees and survivors 

(but not for disabled workers) from 35 to 40, phased in 2010-2018.

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this provision

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Year

Percent

Cost rates with this provision

Cost rates under present law

Income rates with this provision

Income rates under present law

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

 (assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Year

Percent

Present law With this provision
EXHIBIT
32.2
 **PRINCIPAL
FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION**
  In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K , as amended by Amendment No. 1
thereto on Form 10K/A (the “Report”) of Data Systems & Software Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned,
Yacov Kaufman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:


1.
    the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
  Dated: May 2, 2005By:
    /s/ Yacov
KaufmanYacov Kaufman, Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial
      Officer)