alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 99-40783 -1-

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-40783 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JAMES HERMAN STEVENSON, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:98-CR-86-1

- - - - - - - - - - April 11, 2000 Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * James Herman Stevenson, Jr., appeals from his conviction for conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute cocaine base, possession with the intent to distribute cocaine base, and carrying a firearm in relation to drug trafficking. He argues that the warrantless search of the automobile was not supported by probable cause because the police officers did not have reasonable suspicion to employ a drug-detecting canine. Stevenson did not file a motion to suppress in the district court; instead he objected to the admission of the evidenceNo. 99-40783 -2- seized following the search of the automobile. Because, however, he did not make the specific argument in the district court concerning the propriety of the use of the canine, review of the issue is for plain error. See United States v. Spires , 79 F.3d 464, 465 (5th Cir. 1996); see United States v. Knowles , 29 F.3d 947, 950-51 (5th Cir. 1994)(alleged constitutional error in criminal conviction reviewed for plain error). To demonstrate plain error, Stevenson must show clear or obvious error that affects his substantial rights; if he does, this court has discretion to correct a forfeited error that seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings but is not required to do so. See United States v. Calverley , 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994)(en banc). A dog’s "sniff" of a vehicle is not a search, United States v. Seals , 987 F.2d 1102, 1106 (5th Cir. 1993), and does not implicate the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Mendez , 27 F.3d 126, 129 n.4 (5th Cir. 1994). A dog alert alone can provide the probable cause necessary to support a warrantless search of a vehicle under the automobile exception to the warrant requirement. See United States v. Williams , 69 F.3d 27, 28 (5th Cir. 1995), citing Seals , 987 F.2d at 1107. Stevenson cannot show that it was plain error for the district court to admit the evidence the officers seized from the automobile. Stevenson’s appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
### Proposed Provision: E2.17. Apply 12.4 percent payroll tax rate on earnings above $400,000 starting in 2024 and tax all earnings once the current-law taxable maximum exceeds $400,000. Do not provide benefit credit for additional earnings taxed.

back
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

This 14th day of March, 2006



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ R. Daniel Blanton        
|Chief Executive Officer      
|(principal executive officer)
|                             
|/s/ Ronald L. Thigpen        
|Chief Operating Officer      
|(principal financial officer)



162
### Proposed Provision: E2.1. Eliminate the taxable maximum in years 2024 and later, and apply full 12.4 percent payroll tax rate to all earnings. Do not provide benefit credit for earnings above the current-law taxable maximum.

back
### Proposed Provision: E3.7. Increase the taxable maximum by an additional 2 percent per year beginning in 2025 until taxable earnings equal 90 percent of covered earnings. Provide benefit credit for earnings up to the revised taxable maximum. Create a new bend point equal to the current-law taxable maximum with a 5 percent formula factor applying above the new bend point.

back
<page>
  									            EXHIBIT 32.02


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Dean Witter Global
Perspective Portfolio L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-K for
the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jeffrey D. Hahn, Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management
Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.










By:	  /s/	Jeffrey D. Hahn

Name:		Jeffrey D. Hahn
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		March 30, 2004
Exhibit 15.1



LOGO



|                                  |  |  |  |                                  
|--------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------
|                                  |  |  |  | Raymond Chabot Grant Thornton LLP
|                                  |  |  |  | Suite 2000                       
|                                  |  |  |  | National Bank Tower              
|Consent of Independent            |  |  |  | 600 De La Gauchetière Street West
|Registered Public Accounting Firm |  |  |  | Montréal, Quebec H3B 4L8         
|                                  |  | 
|                                  |  |  |  | Telephone: 514-878-2691          
|                                  |  |  |  | Fax: 514-878-2127                
|                                  |  |  |  | www.rcgt.com                     

We have issued our reports dated March 9, 2015, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and internal
control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Intertape Polymer Group Inc. on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014.

We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Intertape Polymer Group Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-67732; File No. 333-97961; File No. 333-108077; File No. 333-114954; File
No. 3333-89763; File No. 333-114960; File No. 333-135599; and File No. 333-184797).





LOGO

Montreal, Canada

March 31, 2015





|1 | CPA auditor, CA, public accountancy permit No. A120795
|- | ------------------------------------------------------

Member of Grant Thornton International Ltd
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM (A)
RAINTREE RESORTS  INTERNATIONAL,  INC. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
(B) FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001058736
<NAME>                        RAINTREE RESORTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                           2,857
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   67,005
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (8,016)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,023
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                92,983
<PP&E>                                           4,441
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (1,144)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 134,001
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,806
<BONDS>                                         92,760
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,578
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                      (2,564)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   134,001
<SALES>                                         32,300
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                42,419
<CGS>                                            8,609
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,183
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,921
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,518
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,723
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,877)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       726
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (5,603)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5,603)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.56)


</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Derycz Scientific, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter Derycz, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Peter DeryczPeter
      DeryczChief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)September
      28, 2009
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 of Unify Corporation (Nos. 333-13203,
333-61705, 333-71814, 333-92973, and 333-98633) of our report dated May 29, 2003, except for Note 14, as to which the date is
June 6, 2003, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Unify Corporation for the year ended April 30, 2003.

/s/
Ernst & Young LLP

Sacramento,
California
July 15, 2003

---

QuickLinks
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Oscar F. Beckwith, Appellant.

Conviction and judgment affirmed.

Opinion by

Bockes, J
Exhibit 10.15








NOTE: Portions of this Exhibit are the subject of a Confidential Treatment Request by the Registrant to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”).  Such portions have been redacted and are marked with a “[***]” in the place of the redacted language.  The redacted information has been filed separately with the Commission.








First Amendment of Supplement to Distribution Agreement





This is an Amendment to the Supplement to Distribution Agreement dated July 27, 2010 (“the Agreement”) between Alpha & Omega Semiconductor (Hong Kong) Limited (“AOS”) and Frontek Technology Corporation (the “Distributor”).  This Amendment will come into effect from April 21, 2011 (“Effective Date”) after it is duly signed by both parties. All expressions not defined here shall have the same meaning as they have in the Agreement. Except to the extent modified by this Amendment, all provisions of the Agreement shall remain in effect.  The parties agree following amendments to the Agreement:





Revise the “Stock Rotation Program 2)”





From:


“Stock Rotation dollar amount is limited up to [***] guarantee and [***] AOS discretionary of net billings for the current three-month period.”





To:


“Stock Rotation dollar amount is limited up to [***] guarantee and [***] AOS discretionary, conditioned upon Distributor's adhering to AOS's backlog and inventory management guidelines as below:


|   |                                                                                                                                                  
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|i) | Distributor maintains backlog within a 4 month window (unless otherwise approved by AOS in writing) with minimal pull-ins and push-outs (by CRD);

|    |                                                                                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|ii) | Distributor plans backlog to achieve 2 month inventory target based on customer's POS forecast;

|     |                                                                                                               
|---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|iii) | Products that were grossly over-ordered will not be eligible for the [***] AOS discretionary Stock Rotation. ”







AOS                                                                             Distributor


By: /s/ Phil Lee  By: /s/ Frontek Technology Corporation


Name & Title:  Phil Lee, General Manager  Name & Title:  Jack Wu, Chairman











***CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION***
#### Washington Street.

April 23, 1906:

*Appeals*— Interlocutory *order*— Act *of May*24, 1878, *P■ L. 129*— Road, *law.*

An order of *the*court of common pleas in a proceeding under the Act of May 24,1878, P. L. 129, giving the right to either of the parties to apply to the court for the appointment'of road viewers if the parties themselves fail to agree upon the viewers, is an interlocutory order, from which no appeal lies.

Argued April 16, 1906.

Appeal, No. 116, April T., 1906, by Waynes burg Borough, from order of C. P. Greene Co., Feb. T., 1905, No. 8, on application for the appointment of viewers In re Washington Street.

Before Rice, P. J., Porter, Morrison, Henderson and Head, JJ.

Appeal quashed.

Application for appointment of viewers.

The opinion of the Superior Court states the case.

*Error assigned*was the order of the court.

*James J. Purman,*with him *Prank W.*Downey, for appellant.

*William J. Kyle*with him *Charles H.*King, for appellee.

Per Curiam,

To the petition filed by Ella B. Gordon for the appointment of five viewers, in conformity with the Act of May 24, 1878, P. L. 129, to assess her damages caused by the change of grade or grades therein described, the borough filed an answer, and upon consideration of the petition and answer the court made the following order: “ And now, December 28, 1905, it is ordered and directed that if the petitioner and borough authorities cannot agree upon the names of viewers to act in this case, that either of them shall have the right to apply to the court within ten days from this date for the appointment of such viewers as the court may select in the premises.” Thereupon the borough took this appeal. When the proceedings thus instituted reach final judgment, an appeal will lie in which the legality and regularity of the proceeding from the beginning *543may be reviewed, but the statute does not contemplate a separate appeal from each interlocutory order, as this undoubtedly is. Therefore the motion to quash must be allowed.

Appeal quashed at the costs of the appellant and the record remitted with a procedendo.
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Level of OASDI Contribution and Benefit Base | Description of Proposed Provision:      Make 90 percent of the earnings subject to the payroll tax (phased in 2009-2018), but retain the current-law taxable maximum for benefit purposes.  This estimate considers all self-employed earnings in computing the percentage of earnings subject to the payroll tax. |
|----------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                              |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2008 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified July 16, 2008 |
Exhibit 99.1

# CERTIFICATIONS

I, Ilia Lekach, certify
that:

|1. |  | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of E Com
          Ventures, Inc.
|-- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | Based on my knowledge, this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report does not
          contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
          necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
          such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periods covered by
          this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report.
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 30, 2003

/s/ ILIA
LEKACH
Ilia Lekach
Chief Executive
Officer
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 9, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 6856]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02497]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER16-806-000]


Nassau Energy, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based 
Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Nassau Energy, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with 
an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a 
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is February 23, 2016.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the 
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an 
eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive 
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). 
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5f191a0d1c10313336313a0c2a2f2f302d2b1f393a2d3c71383029"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="04424156474b6a686d6a61577174746b767044626176672a636b72">[email protected]</span></a>. or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: February 3, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-02497 Filed 2-8-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>