alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 247 (Tuesday, December 26, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66804-66805]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31173]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION

[Finance Docket No. 32827]


Quincy Bay Terminal Co.--Renewal of Operation Exemption--Fore 
River Railroad Company, Inc.

    Fore River Railroad Company, Inc. (Fore River) has agreed to a five 
year renewal of a license and operating agreement with Quincy Bay 
Terminal Co. (QBT), wherein QBT will continue to operate a 3.76-mile 
line of railroad between Quincy, MA, and an interchange with 
Consolidated Rail Corporation at East Braintree, MA. The current 
agreement is scheduled to expire on December 31, 1995.<SUP>1

    \1\ The operation exemption was granted by Fore River to QBT 
under a notice of exemption in Quincy Bay Terminal Co.--Operation 
Exemption--Fore River Railroad Corporation, Finance Docket No. 31997 
(ICC served Jan. 17, 1992).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice is filed under 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(4). If the notice 
contains false 

[[Page 66805]]
or misleading information, the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions 
to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10505(d) may be filed at any 
time. The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically stay 
the transaction.
    Any comments must be filed with: Office of the Secretary, Case 
Control Branch, Interstate Commerce Commission, Washington, DC 20423. A 
copy of any pleading filed with the Commission should be sent to 
applicant's representative: Keith G. O'Brien, 1920 N St., NW., Suite 
420, Washington, DC 20036.<SUP>2

    \2\ Legislation to sunset the Commission on December 31, 1995, 
and transfer remaining functions is now under consideration in 
Congress. Until further notice, parties submitting pleadings should 
continue to use the current name and address.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As a condition to the use of this exemption, any employees 
adversely affected by this transaction will be protected under Norfolk 
and Western Ry. Co.--Trackage Rights--BN, 354 I.C.C. 605 (1978), as 
modified in Mendocino Coast Ry., Inc.--Lease and Operate, 360 I.C.C. 
653 (1980).

    Decided: December 15, 1995.

    By the Commission, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-31173 Filed 12-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7035-01-P
### Proposed Provision: A5. Starting December 2024, add 1 percentage point to the annual COLA for beneficiaries who have lived past a "specified age". The "specified age" is the sum of: (1) 65 and (2) the unisex cohort life expectancy at age 65.

back
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 244 (Wednesday, December 20, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 65668]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30943]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

Notice of Closure of Commission Offices Due to Furlough

AGENCY: International Trade Commission.

SUMMARY: The Commission is providing notice to the public that its 
offices will be closed on Friday, December 29, 1995, because agency 
personnel will be on furlough. All filings due on that date will be due 
on Tuesday, January 2, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donna R. Koehnke, Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing-
impaired persons are advised that information on the matter can be 
obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810.

    Issued: December 15, 1995.

    By order of the Chairman:
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-30943 Filed 12-19-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3590 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3590

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the income cap 
 with respect to the mortgage insurance premium deduction, and to make 
                       such deduction permanent.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             February 7 (legislative day, February 3), 2022

 Ms. Hassan (for herself and Mr. Blunt) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the income cap 
 with respect to the mortgage insurance premium deduction, and to make 
                       such deduction permanent.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Middle Class Mortgage Insurance 
Premium Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. INCREASING THE INCOME CAP FOR AND MAKING PERMANENT THE MORTGAGE 
              INSURANCE PREMIUM DEDUCTION.

    (a) In General.--(1) Section 163(h)(3)(E) of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 is amended--
            (1) in clause (ii), by striking ``$100,000 ($50,000'' and 
        inserting ``$200,000 ($100,000'', and
            (2) by striking clause (iv).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this Act shall apply to 
taxable years beginning after December 31, 2021.
                                 <all>
```
Skip to main content

# Social Security

Search
Menu
Español
Sign in

## Exempt Amounts Under the Earnings Test
#### Charles W Bardeen, Respondent, v. Charles L. Wallace and others, Appellants.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Exhibit 31.2





CERTIFICATION OF


CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


CLAYTON WILLIAMS ENERGY, INC.





CERTIFICATION




I, Michael L. Pollard, certify that:




1.         I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Clayton Williams Energy, Inc.; and




2.         Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.







Date:  December 20, 2010








/s/ Michael L. PollardMichael L. PollardChief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32

Certification of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

We, Wayland J. Russell, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Rainbow
Rentals, Inc. (the Company), and Michael A. Pecchia, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify that to the best of our knowledge, based upon a review
of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 of
the Company (the Report):

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ WAYLAND J. RUSSELL

Wayland J. Russell,
Rainbow Rentals, Inc.
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ MICHAEL A. PECCHIA

Michael A. Pecchia,
Rainbow Rentals, Inc.
Chief Financial Officer

November 13, 2003

18
733 A.2d 491

#### A, ETC., PLAINTIFF, v. B, DEFENDANT, v. HILL WALLACK, ETC., DEFENDANTS-THIRD PARTY MOVANTS.

April 15, 1999.

Leave to appeal is granted.
### Proposed Provision: B3.13. For retired worker beneficiaries newly eligible in 2030 (excluding disabled workers), add a new bend point at the wage-indexed equivalent of the 50th percentile of the AIME distribution minus $100 (for 2015 eligibility) and change the PIA factors to 95/32/15/5. Also move the current-law first bend point from the wage-indexed equivalent of $1,115 in 2023 to $1,417 in 2023. Phase this provision in over 10 years (2030-2039). The phase-in would work on a weighted-average basis: 90% of CL formula + 10% of proposal formula for 2030, 80% of CL formula + 20% of proposal formula for 2031, and so on.

back
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5705 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5705

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen

                                 An Act

 
   To modify certain provisions relating to the Propane Education and 
                            Research Council.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Propane Education and Research 
Enhancement Act of 2014''.
SEC. 2. PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE PROPANE EDUCATION AND RESEARCH 
COUNCIL.
    (a) Functions of Propane Education and Research Council.--Section 
5(f) of the Propane Education and Research Act of 1996 (15 U.S.C. 
6404(f)) is amended in the first sentence by inserting ``to train 
propane distributors and consumers in strategies to mitigate negative 
effects of future propane price spikes,'' after ``to enhance consumer 
and employee safety and training,''.
    (b) Market Survey and Consumer Protection Price Analysis.--Section 
9(a) of the Propane Education and Research Act of 1996 (15 U.S.C. 
6408(a)) is amended in the first sentence by striking ``only data 
provided by the Energy Information Administration'' and inserting ``the 
refiner price to end users of consumer grade propane, as published by 
the Energy Information Administration''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
## Summary Measures and Graphs

- Individual Provisions
- Level of Monthly Benefits

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						B4.2: Increase the number of years used to calculate benefits for retirees and survivors (but not for disabled workers) from 35 to 40, phased in over the years 2024-2032.**

|  |  |
|--|--|
**Exhibit 31.1**




**Certification**




I,
      Terry
      L. McCoy, in my capacity as Executive Vice President of First Horizon Asset
      Securities Inc (the Depositor) do hereby certify that:





1.    I
      have
      reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to
      be
      filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of First
      Horizon Alternative Mortgage Securities Trust 2007-FA1 **** (the
“Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2.    Based
      on
      my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not
      contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
      fact
      necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
      which
      such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
      by
      this report;





3.    Based
      on
      my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required
      to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included
      in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4.  Based
      upon my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report
      under Item 1123 of Regulation AB and except as disclosed in the Exchange
      Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under
      the
      servicing agreements in all material respects; and





5.    All
      of
      the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
      securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance
      with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included
      in
      this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange
      Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
      report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
      of
      noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report
      on
      Form 10-K.





In
      giving
      the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided
      to me
      by The Bank of New York.







**First
                Horizon Asset Securities Inc., as Depositor**By:
            /s/
                Terry L. McCoyTerry
                L. McCoy,Executive
                Vice President
              (Senior
                Officer of the Depositor in charge of
              Securitization)




Date:
      March 28, 2008
| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Michael      Barth  |   |   |        |   |
|------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| Michael      Barth           |   |   |        |   |
| Chief      Financial Officer |   |   |        |   |
| March      30, 2009     |   |   |   |   |

----
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 248 (Wednesday, December 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 66983]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31257]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[MT-070-95-1220-00]


Emergency Closure of Public Roads in Powell County, Montana

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, DOI.

ACTION: Notice of emergency closure of public access roads in Powell 
County, Montana.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that certain public access roads in 
Powell County, Montana, are temporarily closed to all public use, 
including vehicle operation, winter recreational activities, and hiking 
and sightseeing from December 18, 1995, through March 15, 1996. The 
closure is made under the authority of 43 CFR 8364.1.
    The public roads affected by this emergency closure are 
specifically identified as follows: BLM Road No. 2864 as it enters 
public lands and all spur roads accessed by this road.
    The following persons, operating within the scope of their official 
duties, are exempt from the provisions of this closure order: BLM 
employees; local, state, and Federal law enforcement and fire 
protection personnel; the BLM timber purchaser, and its employees and 
subcontractors, within the area accessed by the closed road. Access by 
additional parties may be allowed, but must be approved in advance in 
writing by the Authorized Officer.
    Any person who fails to comply with the provisions of this closure 
order may be subject to the penalties provided in 43 CFR 8360.0-7, 
which include a fine not to exceed $1,000 and/or imprisonment not to 
exceed 12 months.
    The public roads temporarily closed to public use under this order 
will be posted with signs at points of public access.
    The purpose of this emergency temporary closure is to protect 
persons from potential harm from logging operations, particularly the 
hazards associated with log hauling on winter roads.

DATES: This closure is effective from December 18, 1995, through March 
15, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the closure order and maps showing the location of 
the closed roads are available from the Garnet Resource Area office, 
3255 Fort Missoula Road, Missoula, Montana 59801.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Darrell Sall, Garnet Resource Area 
Manager, at (406) 329-3914.

    Dated: December 15, 1995.
Darrell C. Sall,
Garnet Resource Area Manager.
[FR Doc. 95-31257 Filed 12-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DN-P
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 239 (Wednesday, December 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64040-64041]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30322]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. PR96-5-000]


Dow Pipeline Company; Notice of Petition for Rate Approval

December 7, 1995.
    Take notice that on December 1, 1995, Dow Pipeline Company (Dow 
Pipeline) filed, pursuant to Section 284.123(b)(2) of the Commission's 
Regulations, a petition for rate approval requesting that the 
Commission approve as fair and equitable a maximum rate of $0.0782 per 
MMBtu, plus 0.7% in-kind fuel reimbursement, for interruptible 
transportation services performed under Section 311(a)(2) of the 
Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 (NGPA). Dow Pipeline's mailing address 
is P.O. Box 4286, Houston, Texas 77210.
    Dow Pipeline's petition states it is an intrastate pipeline within 
the meaning of Section 2(16) of the NGPA. Dow Pipeline provides 
interruptible transportation service pursuant to Section 311(a)(2) of 
the NGPA through its facilities located in Wharton, Fort Bend, 
Brazoria, Whaller, and Matagorda Counties, Texas. This petition is 
intended to establish a new system-wide maximum transportation rate for 
Section 311(a)(2) service, and is filed pursuant to the terms of the 
Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement filed July 8, 1993, in Docket 
No. PR93-6-000, which required Dow Pipeline to file an application on 
or before December 1, 1995, to justify its current rate or to establish 
a new system-wide rate. Dow Pipeline proposes an effective date of 
December 1, 1995.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion 

[[Page 64041]]
to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 
Washington, DC 20426 in accordance with Sections 385.211 and 385.214 of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before December 22, 1995. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action 
to be taken, but will not serve to make the protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-30322 Filed 12-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Roberts *v.*Lentz, Appellant.

Argued Dec. 7, 1905.

Appeal, No. 62, Oct. T., 1905, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Montgomery Co., March T., 1904, No. 82, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Emma Roberts v. Henry G. Lentz, Surviving Executor of Benjamin Lentz, *408deceased.

March 12, 1906:

Before Rice, P. J., Beaver, Orlady, Porter, Morrison and Henderson, JJ.

Affirmed.

Scire facias sur mortgage. Before Swartz, P. J.

*Henry*Freedley, with him *E. L. Hallman,*for appellant.

*J. B. Larzelere, Jr.,*for appellee.

Opinion by

Rice, P. J.,

• This appeal was argued with the appeal in Norristown Trust Co., etc., v. Henry G. Lentz, post, 408, in which we herewith file an opinion. It was very frankly conceded by the appellant’s counsel that if the judgment in that case was affirmed full justice would be done, so far as his client is concerned, by an affirmation of this judgment also. In view of this concession and of the judgment we have entered in the case inferred to, we are not called upon to enter into a discussion of the questions raised by the two assignments of error in this case, but feel warranted in disposing of the case in the manner suggested.

The judgment is affirmed.
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 11-50550 Summary Calendar

BERNICE MARIE DEROUEN, Plaintiff-Appellant

v. FALLS COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; RICKY SCAMAN, Deputy Sheriff, in his individual and Official Capacities, Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:11-CV-138

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and HAYNES and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * 

### Appellant Bernice Marie DeRouen (“DeRouen”) attempts to challenge the district court’s dismissal for la c k of jurisdiction of her § 1983 suit against a deputy sheriff and “the Sheriff’s Department” of Falls County. The district court dismissed because she has already pursued—and lost—exactly the same claim in Texas state courts. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

## F I L E D Februa ry 15 , 20 12 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 11-50550 Document: 00511759821 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/15/2012

### No. 11-50550

1. Under the Rooker-Feldmandoctrine, she may not continue to litigate the claims by seeking review of the state courts’ decisions in federal court. The district court correctly dismissed on this basis. 1 

### 2. Moreover, DeRouen’s initial brief on appeal utterly fails to address the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, and she has therefore waived any argument based on that doctrine. Brinkmann v. Dallas Cty. Dep. Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). T he appeal fails to raise an issue of arguable merits and is DISMISSED as frivolous. SeeFifth Circuit Rule 42.2.

Rooke r v. Fide li ty Trus t Co. , 263 U. S. 412, 44 S. Ct. 149 (192 3); Di st. of Colum bia Ct. 1 of Ap pe als v. Fe ldm an , 460 U. S. 462 , 103 S. Ct

. 1303 (198 3). 

### 2 Case: 11-50550 Document: 00511759821 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/15/2012