alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 32 (Thursday, February 16, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9021]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3897]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Domestic Personal Property Rate Solicitation--Implementation of 
Proposed Change

AGENCY: Military Traffic Management Command, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice provides notification of MTMC's intent to 
eliminate the additional shipment valuation charges shown as Items 
130a/130b in the Domestic Personal Property Rate Solicitation (D-3) or 
reissues thereof.
    Acting on the recommendation of a Government Accounting Office 
(GAO) study, MTMC intends to eliminate the 64 cents per $100 valuation 
charge, applicable to all points in CONUS, as shown as Item 130a, and 
the additional 64 cents per $100 valuation charge on shipments to or 
from Alaska, shown as Item 130b in the Domestic Personal Property Rate 
Solicitation (D-3), and reissues thereof. GAO believes that carriers 
now have the claims experience needed under increased liability to 
adjust their rates to compensate for any increased liability costs, 
thus making further compensary payments unjustified. The above noted 
shipment valuation charges will cease to apply on November 1, 1995, 
effective with the Domestic Winter rate cycle.

ADDRESSES: Commander, Military Traffic Management Command, ATTN: MTOP-
T-NP, 5611 Columbia Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041-5050.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. Ann Peterson, (703) 756-1190.

DATES: The above shipment valuation charges will cease to apply on 
November 1, 1995.
Kenneth L. Denton,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-3897 Filed 2-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
#### WARD & WARD v. DORA AGRILLO.

(Filed 26 September, 1928.)

1. Trial — Verdict—Setting Aside Verdict.

A verdict may be set aside out of term and out of tbe county under an ' agreement of counsel authorizing tbe judge to do so.

2. Attorney and Client — Pees.

Attorneys rendering services to a party litigant are entitled to at least nominal compensation in their action to recover upon *quantum meruit.*

Appeal by defendant from order of *Harris, J.,*signed at Kinston, N. C., on 25 May, 1928.

Affirmed.

*96This is an action to recover for professional services rendered to defendant, at her request, by plaintiffs, attorneys and counsellors at law, begun and pending in the Superior Court of Craven County. A former appeal by defendant to this Court was dismissed. 194 N. C., 321, 139 S. E., 451.

Judgment by default and inquiry was rendered by the clerk of said court on 25 July, 1927. At February Term, 1928, the action was tried, and the following issue was then submitted to the jury:

“What amount are plaintiffs entitled to recover of the defendant?”

This issue was answered, “Nothing.” From an order signed by the trial judge at Kinston, N. 0., on 25 May, 1928, setting aside the verdict as a matter of law, defendant appealed to the Supreme Court.

*D. L. Ward, Whitehurst & Barden and W. B. R. Guión for plaintiffs.*

*Shaw & Jones and B. G. Beckwith for defendant.*

Pee Oueiam.

We have examined the record and case on appeal in this action with care. The assignments of error, appearing in the case on appeal, and discussed in the briefs filed in this Court upon defendant’s appeal, cannot be sustained. We find no error for which the order setting aside the verdict, as a matter of law, should be reversed. The order is affirmed.

The judge finds, as recited in the order, that it was agreed at February Term, 1928, of the Superior Court of Craven County that the court might take any action on the verdict out of term and out of the county that it could have taken during said term. Stipulations to this effect, signed by counsel, appear in the record. Both parties to the action were represented by counsel when plaintiff’s motion to set aside the verdict was heard and signed at Kinston, N. C., on 25 May, 1928.

Defendant’s exception to the judgment by default and inquiry, and her appeal therefrom, upon the facts appearing in the record, were abandoned. It does not appear that there is merit in the exception; the judgment by default and inquiry is valid. By virtue of said judgment plaintiffs are entitled to recover of defendant at least a nominal sum. As his Honor properly held, there was error on the trial for which the verdict should have been set aside as a matter of law. Upon the next trial the jury should be instructed that plaintiffs are entitled to recover of defendant at least nominal damages. C. S., 596, and cases cited.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 8735]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3724]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice Pursuant To The National Cooperative Research And 
Production Act Of 1993--Phosphoric Acid Steering Committee And Joint 
Venture

    Notice is hereby given that, on December 28, 1994, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. Section 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Phosphoric Acid 
Steering Committee and Joint Venture has filed written notification 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, the new members to the Phosphoric Acid 
Joint Venture are: Chemax, Portland, OR and Venus Laboratories, Inc., 
Wood Dale, IL. In addition, the corporate name of Diversey Corp., 
Livonia, MI was previously incorrect.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership, corporate 
names, or planned activities of the joint venture.
    On April 26, 1991, the Phosphoric Acid Joint Venture filed its 
original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The 
Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register 
pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on May 20, 1991 (56 FR 23089). An 
additional notification was filed by Diversey Corp., on June 1, 1992 
and published in the Federal Register on July 9, 1992 (57 FR 30510).
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 95-3724 Filed 2-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 9, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 6919]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02483]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #14589 and #14590]


Mississippi Disaster Number MS-00083

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION:  Amendment 2.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Mississippi 
(FEMA-4248-DR), dated 01/04/2016.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Tornadoes, Straight-line Winds, and 
Flooding.
    Incident Period: 12/23/2015 through 12/28/2015.
    Effective Date: 01/22/2016.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 03/04/2016.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/04/2016.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of 
Mississippi, dated 01/04/2016, is hereby amended to include the 
following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

Primary Counties: Clay, Itawamba, Monroe, Prentiss, Tallahatchie.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)


James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2016-02483 Filed 2-8-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### Same v. Same.

Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs to abide event.

Opinion by

Daniels, J.
##### 



Exhibit 10.6
  US $100,000.00
    
    October 31, 2007
 BRIDGE LOAN
PROMISSORY NOTE
 Maker Holder
 Interest
 Payments Maturity Date
 Guaranty. Guaranty Guarantors Guaranteed
Obligations
   Prepayment
 Default Event of
Default




---



##### 



Collection Costs
 Waiver
 Transfer
 Governing Law
 Representations and Warranties of Maker
   Representations and Warranties of Guarantors
    2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



Holders Address
    
    
    
    Maker:REMOTE KNOWLEDGE, INC.,a Delaware CorporationBy: /s/ Henry HoustonName: Henry Houston CFOGuarantors:
    
    Alan Granader/s/ Alan GranaderDan Granader/s/ Dan GranaderRandy S. Bayne/s/ Randy S. Bayne
  4
#### TAYLOR & FETZER v. R. F. GENTRY.

(Filed 10 November, 1926.)

Judgments — Pleadings — Default — Meritorious Defense — Appeal and Error.

An order of tbe lower court setting aside a judgment by default will be reversed in tbe Supreme Court, when it is not made to appear that tbe defendant bas a meritorious defense.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Lane, J.,*at February Term, 1926, of' ROCKINGHAM.

Motion to set aside judgment by default final, rendered by tbe recorder’s court of tbe town of Reidsville, 13 October, 1925. Motion allowed by tbe recorder, and tbis ruling was affirmed on appeal to tbe Superior Court at tbe February Term, 1926. Plaintiff appeals.

*J. 0. Brown for plaintiff.*

*No counsel appearing for defendant.*

Stacy, C. J.

Plaintiff obtained judgment by default final in tbe recorder’s court of tbe town of Reidsville on 13 October, 1925. Tbis was set aside fourteen days thereafter, on motion of tbe defendant, on tbe ground of “mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect,” under O. S., 600. On appeal by tbe plaintiff to tbe Superior Court tbe order setting aside tbe judgment in tbe recorder’s court was affirmed.

Plaintiff takes two positions: First, that tbe recorder’s court was without authority to entertain tbe motion, and, as tbe Superior Court could exercise derivative jurisdiction only, it was also without authority to decide tbe question. *Sewing Machine Co. v. Burger,*181 N. C., 241. Second, that on tbe facts found, tbe defendant is not entitled to have tbe judgment vacated or set aside.

Without passing upon tbe merits of tbe first position, we deem it sufficient to say that there is no allegation or finding of a meritorious defense. . It is useless to set aside a judgment where there is no real or substantial defense on tbe merits. *Land Co. v. Wooten,*177 N. C., 248; *Norton v. McLaurin,*125 N. C., 185. “One who asks to be relieved *504from a judgment on the ground of excusable neglect must show merit, as otherwise the court would be asked to do the vain thing of setting aside a judgment when it would be its duty to enter again the same judgment on motion of the adverse party.” *Allen, J.,*in *Crumpler v. Mines,*174 N. C., 283.

On the record, there was error in setting aside the judgment.

Reversed.
FOURTH D I VI SI ON DI LLA R D, C. J. , BROWN and M A R K LE, JJ.

N O T IC E : M otions for r e c ons i de r a tion m us t be ph y sic a l ly r e ce iv ed i n our c le r k ’s offic e w ithin te n da y s of the da te of de c is ion to be de e m ed tim e ly file d.

http://w w w .ga a ppe a l s .us /r ule s Decem ber 20, 2018



# I n th e Co u r t o f

A p p eals o f

G eo r g ia

A1 7 A0 39 1

. L YNCHAR, INC. et al

. v . COLONIAL OIL INDUSTRIES, INC.
B R O W N , J u d g e. In Co lo ni a l Oi l In d

us
. v. Lyn ch a r, In c. , 3 0 3 Ga. 8 3 9 (8 15 SE2 d 9 1 7 ) (2 0 1 8 ),
t h e Su p rem e Co u rt of Geo rg ia rev ers ed t h i s Co u rt ’ s d eci s i o n i n Lyn ch a r, In c. v
. Co l on i a l Oi l In d

u s
. , 3 4 1 Ga. Ap p. 4 8 9 (8 0 1 SE2 d 57 6 ) (2 0 1 7 ). Ac c o r d i n g l y , we

v acat e o u r earl i er o pi n i o n , ad o pt t h e o p i n i o n o f t h e Su p rem e Co u rt as o u r o wn , an d affi rm th e t ri al co u rt ’ s ju d g m en t

. Ju d g men t a f f i r m ed . Di l l ar d

, C. J., a n d Ma r

kl e, J., co n cu r .
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 238 (Tuesday, December 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 63702]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30182]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-75-000]


High Island Offshore System; Notice of Tariff Revision

December 6, 1995.
    Take notice that on December 4, 1995, High Island Offshore System 
(HIOS) tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Original Volume No. 2, the following revised sheets

------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Rate schedule(s)                        Sheet No.           
------------------------------------------------------------------------
T-3....................................  Fifteenth Revised Sheet No. 73.
                                         Ninth Revised Sheet No. 73A.   
                                         Seventh Revised Sheet No. 73B. 
T-17...................................  Second Revised Sheet No. 419.  
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    HIOS states Rate Schedules T-3 and T-17 are gas transportation 
agreements between HIOS and Texas Gas Transmission Corporation (Texas 
Gas), for service authorized by the Commission at Docket No. CP75-104, 
et al.
    HIOS further states that the revisions reflect HIOS' tariff 
conversion from a volumetric to a thermal based tariff effective 
December 1, 1995. The said conversion is in compliance with the 
Commission's Stipulation and Agreement under FERC Docket No. RP94-162.
    HIOS has requested that the subject Tariff revision be accepted for 
filing and made effective on December 1, 1995.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a petition to intervene or to protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rule 211 or Rule 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Pursuant to 
Sec. 154.210 of the Commission's regulations, all such motions or 
protests must be filed not later than 12 days after the date of the 
filing noted above. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party to the proceeding must file a petition to intervene. 
Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available 
for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-30182 Filed 12-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
## Summary Measures and Graphs

- Individual Provisions
- Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable)

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						E2.4: Eliminate the taxable maximum for years 2030 and later (phased in 2024-2030), and apply full 12.4 percent payroll tax rate to all earnings. Provide benefit credit for earnings above the current-law taxable maximum that are subject to the payroll tax, using a secondary PIA formula. This secondary PIA formula involves: (1) an "AIME+" derived from annual earnings from each year after 2023 that were in excess of that year's current-law taxable maximum; (2) a new bend point equal to $9,360 in 2024, indexed by wages after 2024; and (3) formula factors of 3 percent and 0.25 percent below and above the new bend point, respectively.**

|  |  |
|--|--|
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

              CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG, LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements 
(Form S-8 Nos. 33-46460, 33-484473, 33-99372) pertaining to the 1991 Stock 
Option Plan, the 1992 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan and the 1992 
Employee Stock Purchase Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 Nos. 
33-28225, 33-17119, 33-7369) of SyQuest Technology, Inc. of our report dated
December 11, 1996, except for Note 1, "Basis of Presentation", paragraph 5, as 
to which the date is June 27, 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial 
statements and schedule of SyQuest Technology, Inc. included in this Annual 
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 30, 1997.


                                             /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

San Jose, California
February 24, 1998
**Exhibit 23**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our report included in this Form 10-K into
the Company's previously filed Registration Statements (File Nos. 33-48285, 33-88012, 33-80912, 33-85137, 333-28335,
333-1696, 333-60414, 333-72393 and 333-72391).

Arthur Andersen LLP

Boston, MassachusettsDecember 28, 2001

---

**Exhibit 23.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-4825, 33-88012, 33-80912, 33-85137, 333-28335,
333-1696, 333-60414, 333-72393 and 333-72391) of NEXIQ Technologies, Inc. of our report dated November 30, 2001 relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedules, which appears in this Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP

Detroit, Michigan
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of American Superconductor Corporation (the
Company) for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Thomas M. Rosa, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/    Thomas M. Rosa  
|Thomas M. Rosa         
|Chief Financial Officer

June 14, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 8350]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3657]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[FE Docket No 95-09-NG]


Transco Energy Marketing Co.; Order Granting Blanket 
Authorization To Import Natural Gas From Canada

AGENCY: Office of Fossil Energy, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Fossil Energy of the Department of Energy gives 
notice that it has issued an order granting Transco Energy Marketing 
Company authorization to import up to 730 Bcf of natural gas from 
Canada over a two-year term beginning on the date of the first delivery 
after February 6, 1995.
    This order is available for inspection and copying in the Office of 
Fuels Programs Docket Room, 3F-056, Forrestal Building, 1000 
Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20585, (202) 586-9478. The 
docket room is open between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., 
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

    Issued in Washington, D.C., February 7, 1995.
Clifford P. Tomaszewski,
Director, Office of Natural Gas, Office of Fuels Programs, Office of 
Fossil Energy.
[FR Doc. 95-3657 Filed 2-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 245 (Thursday, December 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 66255]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31062]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Vermont Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Vermont Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 9:00 
a.m. and adjourn at 5:30 p.m. on Thursday, January 11, 1996, at the 
Pavilion Office Building, 4th Floor Conference Room, 109 State Street, 
Montpelier, Vermont 05609. The purpose of the meeting is to plan a 
project for fiscal year 1996.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Committee Chairperson Dr. Samuel B. 
Hand, 802-656-3180, or Edward Darden, Acting Director of the Eastern 
Regional Office, 202-376-7533 (TDD 202-376-8116). Hearing-impaired 
persons who will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign 
language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least five 
(5) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, December 12, 1995.
Carol-Lee Hurley,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 95-31062 Filed 12-20-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P