alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable) | Description of Proposed Provision:      Apply 3 percent payroll tax rate on earnings over $300,000 in 2017, with the $300,000 threshold wage-indexed after 2017.  Give proportional  benefit credit for additional earnings in AIME for benefit computation. |
|-------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                           |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2009 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified May 14, 2010 |
#### The People of the State of New York *ex*rel. Philip Hoffman, Respondent, v. Peter S. Osterhoudt and others, Appellants.

Order reversed, with’ fifty dollars costs and disbursements.

Opinion by

Bockes, J.
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 75th 

Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

-2.00% -4.34% -0.26% -0.38% -2.26% -4.72%

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Coverage of Employment

Proposed Provision: Beginning in 2010, exempt individuals with more than 180 quarters of coverage from 

the OASDI payroll tax.

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this provision

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Cost rates with this provision

Income rates under present law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under present law

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Present law With this provision

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2009 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary, Social Security

December 17, 2009

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Cost rates with this provision

Income rates under present law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under present law

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Present law With this provision
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997             JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,693,923               2,715,465
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,647,575               2,334,752
<ALLOWANCES>                                    70,000                 195,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,308,945               5,970,359
<PP&E>                                     144,950,415             309,000,565
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,658,273              15,223,593
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             143,177,903             311,989,514
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      126,663,785             298,269,736
<BONDS>                                    120,581,867             290,170,858
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           270                     378
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,752,809              11,968,360
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               143,177,903             311,999,514
<SALES>                                      4,848,314              12,544,096
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,848,314              12,544,096
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  846,655               2,530,987
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,139,040              11,446,336
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,243,495               4,550,342
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,988,862)            (13,139,161)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,988,862)            (13,139,161)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,988,862)            (13,139,161)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (9.76)                 (34.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

**ChiefFinancial Officer Certification**

 

I, Richard J. Kaplan,certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewedthis Amendment No. 1 to the Form 10-K of DeCrane Aircraft Holdings, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

Date:October 9, 2003

 

 
|   | /s/  RICHARD J. KAPLAN                      |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------|
|   | Richard J.  Kaplan                               |
|   | Senior Vice  President, Chief Financial Officer, |
|   | Secretary and  Treasurer                         |

 

----
# United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 Submitted March 6, 2006 Decided March 13, 2006 Before Hon. Richard A. Posner, Circuit Judge Hon. Ilana Diamond Rovner , Circuit Judge Hon. Terence T. Evans, Circuit Judge

No. 05-2772 NATHANIEL LINDELL, Appeal from the United States District Plaintiff-Appellant, Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. v. No. 02 C 473 JOANNE GOVIER, Defendant-Appellee. Barbara B. Crabb, Chief Judge. Lindell appeals from a judgment dismissing his prisoner’s civil rights suit, in which he primarily claims that the prison is unlawfully restricting his practice of his religion (Wotanism). We had remanded a previous such judgment, in which the district judge had dismissed the suit prematurely, without addressing the merits of Lindell’s claims. Lindell v. McCallum , 352 F.3d 1107 (7th Cir. 2003). In summary judgment proceedings on remand, the judge determined that the claims had no merit, and again dismissed, and Lindell has again appealed. The district judge’s painstaking analysis is sound, and we have nothing to add to it except to note that any residual doubt about the lack of merit of Lindell’s religious claims has been dispelled by our recent decision in Borzych v. Frank, No. 05–3907, 2006 WL 488451 (7th Cir. Mar. 2, 2006). A FFIRMED . UNPUBLISHED ORDER Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53
### Proposed Provision: C1.3. Starting for those age 62 in 2024, index the normal retirement age (NRA) to maintain a constant ratio of expected retirement years (life expectancy at NRA) to potential work years (NRA minus 20). We assume the NRA will increase 1 month every 2 years.
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 5126    Filed: 12/16/19    Entered: 12/16/19 11:40:17    Page 1 of4

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 5126    Filed: 12/16/19    Entered: 12/16/19 11:40:17    Page 2 of4

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 5126    Filed: 12/16/19    Entered: 12/16/19 11:40:17    Page 3 of4

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 5126    Filed: 12/16/19    Entered: 12/16/19 11:40:17    Page 4 of4
Laura J. Richardson

General, Exército dos Estados Unidos

Comandante

Comando Sul dos EUA

A General Laura J. Richardson é nativa de Northglenn, Colorado e 

graduada pela Metropolitan State University de Denver, Colorado. 

Ela foi comissionada como oficial do Exército dos EUA e treinada 

como aviadora do Exército. Ela é pós-graduada em Estratégia de 

Recursos NacionaI pela Dwight D. Eisenhower School for National 

Security and Resource Strategy da Universidade Nacional de 

Defesa (NDU).

O General Richardson serviu anteriormente como Comandante 

Geral do Exército Norte dos EUA (Quinto Exército) em Fort Sam 

Houston, Texas, que é o Comando de Componentes de Serviço do 

Exército para o Comando Norte dos EUA..

Outras designações anteriores como oficial General incluem Subcomandante do Comando das Forças do 

Exército dos EUA em Fort Bragg, Carolina do Norte; Chefe de Ligação Legislativa do Exército ao 

Congresso dos EUA em Washington D.C.; Subchefe do Estado-Maior de Comunicações no QuartelGeneral da Força Internacional de Assistência à Segurança em apoio à Operação Enduring Freedom 

(OEF) em Cabul, Afeganistão; Subcomandante da 1a Divisão de Cavalaria em Fort Hood, Texas; e como 

Chefe do Comando de Testes Operacionais do Exército dos Estados Unidos em Fort Hood, Texas. 

Ao longo da sua carreira, a General Richardson comandou desde o nível de Companhia até o de Teatro 

de Operações do Exército. Ela comandou um Batalhão de Assalto com a 101a Divisão Aérea (Assalto 

Aéreo) em combate, destacando sua unidade de Fort Campbell, Kentucky para o Iraque em 2003-2004, 

em apoio à Operação Iraqi Freedom (OIF). Ela também ocupou inúmeros cargos em diversos locais, 

incluindo o de Assistente Militar do Vice-Presidente dos EUA na Casa Branca em Washington, D.C., o de 

Oficial de Ligação legislativa do Exército com o Congresso no Capitólio dos EUA, e o de Planejadora de 

Campanhas do Exército no Pentágono. 

As medalhas e condecorações da General Richardson incluem a Medalha de Serviço Distinto da Defesa, 

Medalha de Serviço Distinto do Exército (concedida duas vezes), Medalha de Serviço Superior da Defesa 

(concedida duas vezes), Legião de Mérito (concedida quatro vezes), Medalha Estrela de Bronze, Medalha 

de Serviço Meritórios (concedida cinco vezes) e Medalha do Ar (com o Numeral 7). Ela também detém 

vários prêmios de unidade, serviço e campanha, e numerosas insígnias, incluindo a Insígnia de Combate, 

Insígnia de Paraquedista, Insígnia de Assalto Aéreo, Insígnia de Aviador Sênior do Exército, Insígnia de 

Serviço Vice-Presidencial e a Insígnia do Estado-Maior do Exército. 

Ela é casada com o Tenente-General (Aposentado) Jim Richardson, Exército dos EUA, e eles têm uma 

filha e uma neta.
### **Exhibit 23.3**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ENGINEERS**

 

As independent engineeringconsultants, Ryder Scott Company, LP hereby consents to the use of our reportentitled “Southwest Royalties, Inc., Estimated Future Reserves and IncomeAttributable to Certain Leasehold and Royalty Interests, SEC Parameters, as ofDecember 31, 2005” dated March 7, 2006 and data extracted therefrom (andall references to our Firm) included in or made a part of this Form 10-KAnnual Report to be filed on or about March 16, 2006 and to theincorporation by reference of this Form 10-K Annual Report (including theuse of our report and references to our Firm herein) into that certainRegistration Statement on Form S-3 filed by Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. withthe Securities and Exchange Commission, file number 333-116825, and thosecertain Registration Statements on Form S-8 filed by Clayton Williams Energy,Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission, file numbers 33-68320,33-68318, 33-68316, 33-69688, and 33-92834 covering theBonus Incentive Plan of Clayton Williams Energy, Inc., 1993 Stock CompensationPlan of Clayton Williams Energy, Inc., Outside Directors Stock Option Plan ofClayton Williams Energy, Inc., Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. 401(k) Plan &Trust, and the Executive Incentive Stock Compensation Plan of Clayton WilliamsEnergy, Inc., respectively.

 

 

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, LP

 

Houston, Texas

March 15, 2006

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 27 (Thursday, February 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7782-7783]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3242]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Rescission of Social Security Ruling (SSR) 80-36, Title XVI: 
Presumptive Disability and Presumptive Blindness Provision

AGENCY: Social Security Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commissioner of Social Security gives notice of the 
rescission of SSR 80-36.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 9, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joanne K. Castello, Division of 
Regulations and Rulings, Social Security Administration, 6401 Security 
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235, (410) 965-1711.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Social Security Rulings make available to 
the public precedential decisions relating to the Federal old-age, 
survivors, disability, supplemental security income, and black lung 
benefits programs. Social Security Rulings may be based on case 
decisions made at all administrative levels of adjudication, Federal 
court decisions, Commissioner's decisions, opinions of the Office of 
the General Counsel, and other policy interpretations of the law and 
regulations.
    SSR 80-36, issued in 1980, was published in the 1976-1980 
Cumulative Edition of the Rulings on page 482. SSR 80-36 established 
procedures concerning the types of impairments subject to findings of 
presumptive [[Page 7783]] 
disability and presumptive blindess by field office personnel under the 
supplemental security income (SSI) program. However, a number of 
regulations promulgated since the issuance of the Ruling and published 
at 56 FR 65682 (1991) and 58 FR 36059 (1993) have updated the 
presumptive disability and presumptive blindness provisions discussed 
in SSR 80-36. These regulations revised and expanded the procedures for 
making findings of presumptive disability to include additional 
categories of impairments, e.g., claims based on human immunodeficiency 
virus infection of listing-level severity. In addition, the time period 
for the payment of SSI benefits based on a finding of presumptive 
disability and presumptive blindness was expanded from 3 months, as 
stated in SSR 80-36, to 6 months by section 5038 of Pub. L. 101-508. 
Consequently, SSR 80-36, which was issued prior to these regulations 
and statutory changes, is now obsolete and is rescinded.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance, Program 93.807, 
Supplemental Security Income.)

    Dated: February 1, 1995.
Shirley S. Chater,
Commissioner of Social Security.
[FR Doc. 95-3242 Filed 2-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4190-29-P
Exhibit 32(b)





NORTHEAST ENERGY, LP


(the registrant)





Section 1350 Certification








We, T. J. Tuscai and Mark R. Sorensen, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the registrant for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 (Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.








Dated:  August 12, 2009











T. J. TUSCAI


T. J. Tuscai


President


(equivalent to the Chief Executive Officer)


ESI Northeast Energy GP, Inc.


As Administrative General Partner of


Northeast Energy, LP














MARK R. SORENSEN


Mark R. Sorensen


Vice President and Treasurer


(equivalent to the Chief Executive Officer)


ESI Northeast Energy GP, Inc.


As Administrative General Partner of


Northeast Energy, LP















































A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing
of the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing).
## Detailed Single Year Tables

- Individual Provisions
- Level of Monthly Benefits

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						B1.4: Progressive price indexing (50th percentile) of PIA factors beginning with individuals newly eligible for OASDI benefits in 2030: Create a new bend point at the 50th percentile of the AIME distribution of newly retired workers. Maintain current-law benefits for earners at the 50th percentile and below. Reduce the 32 and 15 percent factors above the 50th percentile such that the initial benefit for a worker with AIME equal to the taxable maximum grows by inflation rather than the growth in the SSA average wage index.**

### Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program

### Summarized Estimates
## Detailed Single Year Tables

- Individual Provisions
- Level of Monthly Benefits

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						B6.1: Provide a 5 percent increase to the monthly benefit amount (MBA) of any beneficiary who is 85 or older at the beginning of 2024 or who reaches their 85th birthday after the beginning of 2024.**

### Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program

### Summarized Estimates
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 3, 1996)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 230]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31592]








Commodity Futures Trading Commission

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, January 26, 1996.

PLACE: 1155 21st St. N.W., Washington, D.C. 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Lynn K. Gilbert,

Deputy Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 95-31592 Filed 12-29-95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
## Summary Measures and Graphs

- Individual Provisions
- Level of Monthly Benefits

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						B6.3: Provide an increase in the benefit level of any beneficiary who is 85 or older at the beginning of 2025 or who reaches their 85th birthday after the beginning of 2025. Increase the beneficiary's PIA based on an amount equal to the average retired-worker PIA at the end of 2024, or at the end of the year age 80 if later. Increase the beneficiary's PIA by 5 percent of this amount for those older than 85 at the beginning of 2025 and by 5 percent of this amount at age 85 for others, phased in at 1 percent per year for ages 81-85.**

|  |  |
|--|--|
#### Cherry Township *v.*Sullivan County, Appellant.

*Appeals*— Quashing *appeal*— Interlocutory *order*— Pleading.

An order sustaining a demurrer to a statement of claim to a certain extent, “with leave, however, to the plaintiff to amend the statement in this respect,” but overruling the demurrer in all other respects, is an interlocutory order from which no appeal lies.

Argued March *7,*1906.

Appeal, No. 7, March T., 1906, by defendant, from order *of*C. P. Sullivan Co., Sept. T., 1902, No. 62, sustaining demurrer to statement in case of Cherry Township v. Sullivan County.

Before Rice, P. J., Porter, Henderson, Morrison, Orlady, Head and Beaver, JJ.

Appeal quashed.

Demurrer to statement. Before Terry, P. J.

The opinion of the Superior Court states the case.

*Error assigned*was the order of the court.

*E. J.*Mullen, for appellant.

*503April 23, 1906:

*Alphonsus Walsh,*for appellee.

— A judgment on demurrer is not a final decree and an appeal therefrom will be quashed : Bishop v. Culver et al., 1 W. N. C. 272.

An appeal does not lie where proceedings are still pending in the court below: Hope Hose Co.’s App., 2 W. N. C. 451; Com. v. Blatt, 165 Pa. 218.

A judgment on demurrer is interlocutory or final in the same manner and in the same cases as a judgment by default: Tyler v. Hand, 48 U. S. 573; Kirchner v. Wood, 48 Mich. 199 (12 N. W. Repr. 44); Gesell’s App., 84 Pa. 238; Citizens’ B. & L. Assn. v. Hoagland, 87 Pa. 326.

Pee Cueiam,

The defendant demurred to the plaintiff’s statement of claim ; after hearing the court held that the statement was defective in a certain particular, and to dihat extent sustained the demurrer, “ with leave, however, to the plaintiff to amend the statement in this respect,” and in all other respects overruled the demurrer. Thereupon the plaintiff filed an amended statement curing the defect pointed out in the opinion of the court. The defendant then took this appeal. The plaintiff moves to quash upon the ground, amongst others, that the order of the court is not a final judgment, and therefore the appeal is premature. The cases, cited in the appellee’s brief, and many others that might be cited, show conclusively that the motion must prevail.

The appeal is quashed at the appellant’s cost, and the record remitted with a procedendo.