alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 28 (Friday, February 10, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 7934]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3333]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52

[TN-139-1-6667b; FRL-5141-1]


Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Tennessee; Revision to New Source Review, Construction and Operating 
Permit Requirements

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA proposes to approve the State Implementation Plan 
(SIP) revision submitted by the State of Tennessee for the purpose of 
bringing the State's new source review (NSR) regulations into 
compliance with the 1990 amendments to the Clean Air Act (CAA) and the 
Federal regulations. In the final rules section of this Federal 
Register, the EPA is approving the State's SIP revision as a direct 
final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a 
noncontroversial revision amendment and anticipates no adverse 
comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the 
direct final rule. If no adverse comments are received in response to 
that direct final rule, no further activity is contemplated in relation 
to this proposed rule. If EPA receives adverse comments, the direct 
final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be 
addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. The 
EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any 
parties interested in commenting on this document should do so at this 
time.
DATES: To be considered, comments must be received by March 13, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be addressed to: Ms. Karen Borel, at 
the Regional Office Address listed.
    Copies of the material submitted by the State of Tennessee may be 
examined during normal business hours at the following locations:

    Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center (Air Docket 6102), 
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20460.
    Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4 Air Programs Branch, 345 
Courtland Street, NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30365.
    Tennessee Division of Air Pollution Control, 701 Broadway, Customs 
House, 4th floor, Nashville, Tennessee 37247-1531.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Karen Borel, Regulatory Planning 
and Development Section, Air Programs Branch, Air, Pesticides & Toxics 
Management Division, Region 4 Environmental Protection Agency, 345 
Courtland Street, NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30365. The telephone number is 
404/347-3555, ext 4197. Reference file TN-139-1-6667b.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information see the direct 
final rule which is published in the rules section of this Federal 
Register.

    Dated: January 9, 1995.
Patrick M. Tobin,
Acting Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 95-3333 Filed 2-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under
our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
  a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; andb.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 Date: August 6, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Lewis W. Dickey, Jr.Lewis W. Dickey, Jr.Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 336 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 336

 To amend the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 to 
 reauthorize the Ohio & Erie National Heritage Canalway, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 22, 2021

Mr. Brown (for himself and Mr. Portman) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 to 
 reauthorize the Ohio & Erie National Heritage Canalway, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF OHIO & ERIE NATIONAL HERITAGE CANALWAY.

    Division II of the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 
1996 (Public Law 104-333; 110 Stat. 4274; 122 Stat. 824; 122 Stat. 826; 
127 Stat. 3801; 127 Stat. 420; 128 Stat. 314; 133 Stat. 778) is 
amended--
            (1) in section 809, by striking ``2021'' and inserting 
        ``2036''; and
            (2) in section 810(a), by striking ``$20,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$30,000,000''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3671 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3671

To apply the Freedom of Information Act to actions and decisions of the 
 Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information in 
   carrying out the Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 16, 2022

 Mr. Scott of Florida (for himself, Mr. Wicker, Mr. Thune, Mr. Blunt, 
 Mr. Cruz, Mrs. Fischer, Mr. Moran, Mr. Sullivan, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. 
 Young, Mr. Lee, Mr. Johnson, Mrs. Capito, and Ms. Lummis) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                            on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To apply the Freedom of Information Act to actions and decisions of the 
 Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information in 
   carrying out the Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Broadband Buildout Accountability 
Act''.

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY OF FOIA TO THE BROADBAND EQUITY, ACCESS, AND 
              DEPLOYMENT PROGRAM.

    Section 60102(o)(2) of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act 
(47 U.S.C. 1702(o)(2)) is amended by inserting after ``Act')'' the 
following: ``, except for section 552 of that title (commonly referred 
to as the `Freedom of Information Act')''.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

OCTAVIO GOMEZ-GONZALEZ, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 17-70904 

Agency No. A098-921-235 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 15, 2019**

Before: SCHROEDER, SILVERMAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Octavio Gomez-Gonzalez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an 

immigration judge’s order of removal and denying his motion for administrative 

closure. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition for 

review.

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUL 17 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-70904 

Gomez-Gonzalez establishes no error in the agency’s denial of 

administrative closure under the factors applicable at the time of the hearing. See 

Gonzalez-Caraveo v. Sessions, 882 F.3d 885, 891 (9th Cir. 2018).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0013

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

ELIZABETH MARGARET HOSCHOUER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 23, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Beth Baker

Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 16 2023

05/16/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0013
#### BOARD OF ROAD COMMISSIONERS OF TRANSYLVANIA COUNTY et al. v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF TRANSYLVANIA COUNTY et al.

(Filed 21 December, 1927.)

Appeal and Error — Mandamus—Record—Findings of Fact — Remand.

Sufficient facts must appear of record in appeal in proceedings for mandamus.

Appeal by defendant from *Schencle, J'.,*at Chambers, 3 September, 1927.

Remanded.,

Action for writ of mandamus, to compel defendant board to levy a tax sufficient to raise the amount of the budget filed with defendant board by plaintiff, for the construction and maintenance of public roads in Transylvania County during the ensuing year.

From judgment in accordance with the prayer of the plaintiff, defendant appealed to the Supreme Court.

*819
      *W. E. Breece and Bless, Winborne, Bless & Broctor for plaintiff.*

*Ralph Fisher for defendant.*•

PeR CueiaM.

Tbis action arises ont of a controversy between plaintiff and defendant as to tbe amount of money required for tbe construction and maintenance of tbe public roads of Transylvania County, for tbe year 1927-28. Botb plaintiff and defendant filed affidavits to be considered on tbe bearing before tbe judge, sustaining tbeir respective contentions as to tbe facts involved in tbe controversy. Tbe judge, however, bas found no facts upon wbicb to base bis judgment. Serious questions of law are discussed in tbe briefs filed in tbis Court, some of wbicb, at least, do not seem to be raised by tbe record. We cannot proceed to “a consideration of these questions of law, in tbe absence of a finding by tbe judge of tbe facts involved in tbe controversy. *Britt v. Board of Canvassers,*172 N. C., 797. There was no error in tbe denial by tbe judge of defendant’s demand for a trial by jury, but tbis being an action for a writ of mandamus tbe judge should find tbe facts and embody bis findings in bis judgment.

Tbe action is, therefore, remanded to tbe Superior Court of Transylvania County, to tbe end that tbe facts involved in tbe controversy may be found, and made to appear properly in tbe record. It is so ordered.

Eemanded.
#### Artemas Sahler, Respondent, v. Edwin Lawson and others, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

###### National Science Board

      ( print page 4344)    
                    The National Science Board's                     *ad hoc*                     Task Force on NEON Performance and Plans, pursuant to NSF regulations (45 CFR part 614), the National Science Foundation Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1862n-5), and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the scheduling of a meeting for the transaction of National Science Board business, as follows:                

# DATE AND TIME:

Thursday, January 28, 2016 at 10:00 to 11:00 a.m. EST.

# SUBJECT MATTER:

Task Force Chair's opening remarks; approval of minutes; NSF Director's update; and Chair's closing remarks.

# STATUS:

Closed.

This meeting will be held by teleconference originating at the National Science Board Office, National Science Foundation, 4201Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230.

                        Please refer to the National Science Board Web site (                        *www.nsf.gov/​nsb*) for information or schedule updates, or contact: Elise Lipkowitz (                        *elipcowi@nsf.gov*), National Science Foundation, 4201Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230.                    

Ann Bushmiller,

NSB Senior Legal Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2016-01643 Filed 1-25-16; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-PA26JA3.
Exhibit 32.1








Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Mark A. Hiatt, Chief Executive Officer of America First Tax Exempt Investors, L.P., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Partnership for the year endedMarch 31, 2011(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and




|    |                                                                                                                                                         
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.




Date: May 9, 2011


/s/ Mark A. HiattMark A. HiattChief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to America First Tax Exempt Investors, L.P. and will be retained by America First Tax Exempt Investors, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 -0.39 -0.69 -11% -16%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

September 15, 2023

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Level of Monthly Benefits

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: B3.10. Beginning with those newly eligible for OASDI benefits in 2030, gradually 

increase the first PIA bend point in each year so that it is 15 percent higher for those newly eligible in 2044 

and later.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision
#### W. P. GHOLSON v. S. T. SCOTT.

(Filed 4 March, 1931.)

Appeal and Error J e — Plaintiff held not to he prejudiced by allowance of amendment to answer in this case.

Where, in an action involving the issue of negligence, contributory negligence is pleaded in substance by defendant, an amendment allowed defendant to make his allegation more specific is not held reversible error under the facts of this appeal. C. S., 545, 547.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Sinclair, J.,*at October Term, 1930, of YaNCe.

No error.

*Perry & Kittrell and J. P. & J. H. Zollicoffer for plaintiff.*

*B. H. Hieles and Hides & Stem for defendant.*

Pee Oueiam.

The plaintiff brought suit to recover damages for personal injury caused by his being struck by an automobile driven by the defendant. The jury found from the evidence that the plaintiff had been injured by the negligence of the defendant and that the plaintiff by his own negligence had contributed to his injury. No damages were assessed.

As a defense contributory negligence was pleaded in substance but not according to the usual formula, and the presiding judge permitted the defendant to make the plea more specific by amendment. The amendment was drafted but, having been lost, it is not set out in the record.

It is hard to see how the plaintiff could have been misled or prejudiced by the amendment, which was introduced merely to make the defense more definite. C. S., 545, 547.

No error.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 8348]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3652]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Financial Assistance Award: Dr. Jesse J. Brown

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy announces that pursuant to 10 
CFR 600.6(a)(2) it is making a financial assistance award under Grant 
Number DE-FG01-95EE15598 to Dr. Jesse J. Brown of MATVA, Inc. The 
proposed grant will provide funding in the estimated amount of $99,606 
by the Department of Energy for the purpose of saving energy through 
further development of the Dr. Jesse J. Brown's ``Syntheses and 
Sintering of Fine and Ultrafine Grain NZP Ceramics'' process technology 
for the production of thermal shock resistant ceramics similar to 
sodium-zirconium-phosphate materials.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department of Energy has determined in 
accordance with 10 CFR 600.14(e)(1) that the unsolicited application 
for financial assistance submitted by Dr. Jesse J. Brown is meritorious 
based on the general evaluation required by 10 CFR 600.14(d) and the 
proposed project represents a unique idea that would not be eligible 
for financial assistance under a recent, current or planned 
solicitation. Dr. Brown and his subcontractors, Virginia Tech and 
Caterpillar Corporation, will produce and then test diesel engine 
manifold liners made from his advanced ceramic materials in low-heat-
rejection diesel lines. The materials have physical properties 
including good thermal insulation, low-coefficient of thermal 
expansion, good high temperature physical strength and extremely high 
melting points that make them excellent candidates for use in many 
energy intensive systems. The proposed project is not eligible for 
financial assistance under a recent, current or planned solicitation 
because the funding program, the Energy Related Invention Program 
(ERIP), has been structured since its beginning in 1975 to operate 
without competitive solicitations because the authorizing legislation 
directs ERIP to provide support for worthy ideas submitted by the 
public. The program has never issued and has no plans to issue a 
competitive solicitation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Please write the U.S. Department of 
Energy, Office of Placement and Administration, ATTN: Rose Mason, HR-
531.23, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, D.C. 20585.
    The anticipated term of the proposed grant is 18 months from the 
date of award.

    Issued in Washington, D.C. on January 30, 1995.
Richard G. Lewis,
Contracting Officer, Office of Placement and Administration.
[FR Doc. 95-3652 Filed 2-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P