alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Understanding Interaction among Individual Provisions that Would      Change the Social Security Program

- Office of the Chief Actuary
- Individual Provisions

    One summary measure that is frequently used as an indicator of whether or    not a proposal achieves solvency is the 75-year actuarial balance.  When    the actuarial balance is zero or positive, financing for the program is    considered to be adequate for the 75-year period as a whole.  Therefore,    the first goal is to have the improvement in the actuarial balance under    the proposal equal or exceed the actuarial deficit under current law.  One    might attempt to meet this goal by adding together the changes in    actuarial balance indicated for each provision included in a proposal.    However, due to the interaction among various provisions, the sum of the    changes in the actuarial balance often exceeds the change in the actuarial    balance for the proposal as a whole because the change in the actuarial    balance for each provision is measured individually against current law.    When several provisions that improve the actuarial balance are combined,    the measured incremental effect of any single provision is often smaller    than the effect of that provision measured individually against current    law.    
        - Provision 1: Increase the early retirement age (EEA) an additional       three years; the EEA would increase to age 65. Specifically, all       program parameters that are linked to the EEA would also increase.       This would include expanding the benefit computation period (the number       of years used to calculate benefits) as the EEA increases.
        - Provision 2: Increase the number of years used to calculate       benefits for retirees from 35 to 38.

    If each of these two provisions were measured against current law, the sum    of the individual financial effects would be different than the overall    effect when the provisions are combined together.  Under provision 1, the    number of years used to calculate benefits increases from 35 to 38 because    the number of calculation years increases by one year when the EEA    increases one year. But under provision 2 alone, the number of years would    also increase to 38.  Thus, in this case, inclusion of provision 2 adds no    additional savings to the amount estimated for provision 1 alone.    

    It should be noted that further analysis is required in order to determine    whether a proposal is expected to achieve solvency throughout the 75-year    period or to achieve sustainable solvency.  In order to achieve 75-year    solvency, the projected assets in the trust funds must be positive    throughout the 75-year period.  In order to achieve sustainable solvency,    the proposal must achieve solvency throughout the 75-year period, and the    projected trust fund assets must be stable or rising as a percentage of    annual program cost at the end of the period.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 9, 2022

No. 04-22-00376-CR

Jose Andres ROMERO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 7291

Honorable Albert D. Pattillo, III, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On June 29, 2022, the court reporter filed a notification of late record, stating that the 

reporter’s record has not been filed because appellant has failed to request the record in writing. 

We therefore ORDER appellant to provide written proof to this court by August 19, 2022 that 

the appellant has requested the court reporter to prepare the reporter’s record, which request must 

designate the portions of the proceedings and the exhibits to be included. See TEX. R. APP. P.

34.6(b)(1). The reporter’s record must be filed no later than thirty days after the date appellant’s 

written proof is filed with this court. If appellant fails to request the record in writing, the court 

will consider only those issues or points raised in appellant’s brief that do not require a reporter’s 

record for a decision. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c).

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of August, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT
32.2

CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
OF GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Clifton A. Payne,
Chief Financial Officer of Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. (the Company), hereby
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in
connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), that:

| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of
  Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
  and             
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                    
| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly
  presents, in all material respects, the Companys financial condition and
  results of operations.

|By:  /s/  Clifton
  A. Payne                                   
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                               
|Clifton A. Payne
  Sr. Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
|                                                               
|Dated:  May 12, 2004                                           

29

---

---
## The 2023 OASDI Trustees Report

Office of the Chief Actuary

Actuarial Publications

- Table of Contents
- List of Tables
- List of Figures
- Index       Footer menu
## Detailed Single Year Tables

- Individual Provisions
- Cost-of-Living Adjustment

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						A4: Starting December 2026, compute the COLA using a chained version of the consumer price index for wage and salary workers (CPI-W). We estimate this new computation will reduce the annual COLA by about 0.3 percentage point, on average. The new COLA will not apply to DI benefits. It will apply to OASI benefits, except for those of formerly disabled-workers who converted to retired-worker status.**

### Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program

### Summarized Estimates
#### Rowland Brill, Appellant, v. John Brill, Respondent.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted. Opinion by

Pratt, J.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to

to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of SAVVIS, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



|(a) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  |                         |  | 
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------ |  | ----------------------- |  | 
|Date: July 31, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Philip J. Koen |  |                        
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  | Philip J. Koen          |  | 
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  | Chief Executive Officer |  | 



42
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 25 (Tuesday, February 7, 1995)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 7428]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3218]




                
Annex I--Modifications to General Note 4(d) of 
                the HTS

                Effective with respect to articles both: (i) imported 
                on or after January 1, 1976, and (ii) entered, or 
                withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
                July 1, 1995.
                General note 4(d) is modified by:
                (a) deleting the following HTS subheadings and the 
                country set out opposite such subheadings:


3909.10.00......  Israel                                                                                  
4011.91.50......  Israel                                                                                  
8419.19.00......  Israel                                                                                  
8419.90.10......  Israel                                                                                  
8517.30.15......  Israel                                                                                  
                                                                                                          

                (b) deleting the country set out opposite the following 
                HTS subheadings:


2903.40.40......  Israel                                                                                                                    
2903.59.40......  Israel                                                                                                                    
2918.90.30......  Bahamas                                                                                                                   
2933.40.10......  Israel                                                                                                                    
7113.19.50......  Israel                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                            


[FR Doc. 95-3218
Filed 2-6-95; 11:08 am]
Billing code 3190-01-P
#### FRED SANDLIN, by His Next Friend, R. K. SANDLIN, v. HENRY JARMAN.

(Filed 24 November, 1937.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *Sinclair, J.,*at April Term, 1937, of Onslow.

Civil action to recover damages alleged 'to have been caused by tbe negligence of tbe defendant wben tbe automobile driven by plaintiff collided witb defendant’s truck, wbicb was standing on tbe highway in tbe nighttime, without lights, and in violation of law.

Upon denial of liability and issues joined, tbe jury answered tbe issue of negligence in favor of tbe defendant.

From judgment on tbe verdict, plaintiff appeals, assigning errors.

*834*J. A. J ones and Wallace & White for plaintiff, appellant.*

*SummersiTl ■& Summersill for defendant, appellee.*

Per Curiam.

Upon a controverted issue of fact, tbe jury has responded in favor of tbe defendant. Tbe court’s charge to tbe jury is challenged in several particulars, but none of tbe exceptions are regarded of sufficient moment-to work a new trial. No new question of law is presented by any of tbe assignments of error. Tbe verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 23.2


KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
6565 Americas Parkway, NE Suite 700
Post Office Box 3939
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87190




The Board of Directors
SBS Technologies, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement
(No. 333-58) on Form S-3 and registration statement (No. 33-98558) on
Form S-8/S-3 of SBS Technologies, Inc. of our report dated July 30, 1996, 
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of SBS Technologies, Inc. and 
subsidiaries as of June 30, 1996 and 1995 and the related consolidated 
statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for 
each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 1996, which report 
appears in the June 30, 1996 annual report on Form 10K of SBS Technologies, 
Inc.




                                                        KPMG Peat Marwick LLP





Albuquerque, New Mexico
November 5, 1996
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23



The Board of Directors
SBS Technologies, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements 
(No.'s 333-23053 and 333-98558) on Form S-8 and (No. 333-20129) on Form S-3 
of SBS Technologies, Inc. of our report dated August 4, 1998, relating to the 
consolidated balance sheets of SBS Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries as of 
June 30, 1998, and 1997, and the related consolidated statements of 
operations, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the 
years in the three year period ending June 30, 1998, which report appears in 
the June 30, 1998, annual report on Form 10-K of SBS Technologies, Inc..

                                   /S/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP



Albuquerque, New Mexico
September 24, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,702
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,431
<ALLOWANCES>                                       120
<INVENTORY>                                      7,609
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,595
<PP&E>                                           1,845
<DEPRECIATION>                                     619
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,369
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,962
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           118
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,289
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,369
<SALES>                                         28,573
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,646
<CGS>                                           14,088
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,088
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,161
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    40
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,397
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,393
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,004
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,004
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16


</TABLE>
Year Cost Rate

Income 

Rate

Annual 

Balance

2008 11.20 12.77 1.57 359

2009 11.26 12.81 1.54 369

2010 11.37 12.82 1.46 378

2011 11.53 12.84 1.31 386

2012 11.76 12.87 1.11 392

2013 12.03 12.90 0.87 394

2014 12.32 12.92 0.60 395

2015 12.62 12.94 0.32 393

2016 12.92 12.96 0.04 390

2017 13.23 12.98 -0.24 385

2018 13.51 13.00 -0.51 379

2019 13.80 13.02 -0.77 372

2020 14.07 13.04 -1.03 364

2021 14.33 13.06 -1.27 355

2022 14.57 13.07 -1.49 345

2023 14.79 13.09 -1.70 334

2024 15.00 13.10 -1.90 323

2025 15.20 13.12 -2.08 311

2026 15.37 13.13 -2.24 299

2027 15.53 13.14 -2.39 285

2028 15.68 13.15 -2.53 272

2029 15.81 13.16 -2.65 257

2030 15.92 13.17 -2.75 243

2031 15.99 13.18 -2.82 228

2032 16.05 13.18 -2.87 213

2033 16.08 13.19 -2.89 198

2034 16.08 13.19 -2.89 182

2035 16.05 13.19 -2.87 167

2036 16.02 13.19 -2.83 152

2037 15.97 13.19 -2.78 137

2038 15.90 13.19 -2.72 122

2039 15.82 13.18 -2.64 107

2040 15.72 13.18 -2.54 93

2041 15.63 13.18 -2.45 78

2042 15.52 13.17 -2.35 64

2043 15.42 13.17 -2.26 50

2044 15.32 13.16 -2.16 37

2045 15.23 13.16 -2.07 24

2046 15.13 13.15 -1.98 10

2047 15.05 13.15 -1.90 ----

2048 14.96 13.15 -1.82 ----

2049 14.88 13.14 -1.74 ----

2050 14.81 13.14 -1.67 ----

2051 14.75 13.14 -1.61 ----

2052 14.69 13.14 -1.55 ----

2053 14.63 13.13 -1.50 ----

2054 14.58 13.13 -1.45 ----

2055 14.53 13.13 -1.40 ----

2056 14.49 13.13 -1.36 ----

2057 14.45 13.13 -1.33 ----

2058 14.41 13.13 -1.29 ----

2059 14.38 13.12 -1.25 ----

2060 14.34 13.12 -1.22 ----

2061 14.30 13.12 -1.18 ----

2062 14.27 13.12 -1.15 ----

2063 14.23 13.12 -1.11 ----

2064 14.20 13.12 -1.08 ----

2065 14.16 13.12 -1.05 ----

Detailed Single Year Tables

Category of Change: Level of Monthly Benefits (PIA)

Proposed Provision: Progressive price indexing of PIA formula factors beginning with individuals newly 

eligible for OASDI benefits in 2015. Create new bend point at the 40th percentile of earners. Maintain 

current-law benefits for earners at the 40th percentile and below and reduce upper 2 formula factors 

(32% and 15%) such that maximum worker benefit grows by inflation rather than the growth in average 

wages.

Expressed as a percentage of taxable payrol Trust Fund 

Ratio 

1-1-year
2066 14.14 13.11 -1.02 ----

2067 14.11 13.11 -1.00 ----

2068 14.08 13.11 -0.97 ----

2069 14.05 13.11 -0.94 ----

2070 14.03 13.11 -0.92 ----

2071 14.01 13.11 -0.90 ----

2072 13.99 13.11 -0.88 ----

2073 13.97 13.11 -0.86 ----

2074 13.95 13.11 -0.84 ----

2075 13.93 13.11 -0.82 ----

2076 13.91 13.11 -0.81 ----

2077 13.90 13.10 -0.79 ----

2078 13.88 13.10 -0.78 ----

2079 13.87 13.10 -0.76 ----

2080 13.85 13.10 -0.75 ----

2081 13.84 13.10 -0.74 ----

2082 13.83 13.10 -0.73 ----

2083 13.82 13.10 -0.72 ----

2084 13.81 13.10 -0.71 ----

2085 13.80 13.10 -0.70 ----

Summarized Rates: OASDI

2008 Cost Rate Income Rate

Actuarial 

Balance

-2082 14.42% 13.88% -0.55% 1.15%

Office of the Chief Actuary, Social Security

Estimates based on Intermediate Assumptions of the 2008 Trustees Report

Change in 

Actuarial Balance

July 17, 2008
#### N. W. and L. V. HARDISON v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY.

(Filed 28 September, 1927.)

Appeal by defendant from *Qranmer, J.,*at Spring Term, 1927, of Pamlico.

*Z. V. Bawls for plaintiffs.*

*Moore & Durni for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

The plaintiffs brought suit to recover $94.50 for loss sustained in the shipment of a. car of potatoes from New Bern, N. O., to *792Lynchburg, Ya. There was evidence tending to show that the potatoes were carried in an open box car during very cold weather. In response to the issues the jury found that the defendant failed to provide a suitable and fit car and assessed the plaintiffs’ damages at $94.50. Judgment was thereon given for the plaintiffs, from which the defendant appealed, assigning error. Upon an examination of the record we find no sufficient reason for granting a new trial.

No error.
#### Gideon S. Wheaton, Respondent, v. The President, etc., of The Delaware and Hudson Canal Company, Appellant.

Motion for new trial denied and judgment for plaintiff on verdict, with costs.

Opinion by

Bockes, J.
| 1.     | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                              |
| 2.     | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |

|                                 |                                                |                                |
|--------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| Dated:              October 19, 2006 |                                                |
|                            |                                           |                           |
|                                 | By:                                       | /s/ Michael              Barth |
|                                 | Michael              Barth, Chief Financial Officer |
|                                 | (Principal                Financial Officer)        |
Court of Appeals

Twelfth Court of Appeals District at Tyler

BILL OF COSTS

Court of Appeals No. 12-17-00116-CV

Trial Court No. 00375-CCL-16

Zelena Barbay

Vs.

Mary McCarty, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Stanley

William Taraba

DOCUMENTS FILED AMOUNT FEE PAID BY

Clerk's record

Reporter's record

Motion fee

Required Texas.gov efiling fee

Indigent

Filing

Supreme Court chapter 51 fee

$56.00

$91.00

$10.00

$30.00

$25.00

$100.00

$50.00

CHRISTOPHER TINSLEY

Appellant Zelena Barbay

Judy Emerson

Judy Emerson

Judy Emerson

Judy Emerson

Judy Emerson

TOTAL: $362.00

I, Pam Estes, Clerk of the Court of Appeals, Twelfth Court of Appeals District at Tyler, Texas,

certify that the above copy of the Bill of Costs is true and correct. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND

AND SEAL OF SAID COURT, at Tyler, this 1st day of December 2017, A.D.

PAM ESTES, CLERK

By:_____________________________

Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk

FILE COPY