alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### BUXTON WHITE SEED COMPANY v. ROBERT T. COCHRAN AND COMPANY.

(Filed 14 September, 1932.)

Appeal and Error P c — Assignments of error in this case held defective.

Assignments of error which do not indicate their relevancy to the controversy or show their pertinency to the questions sought to be presented are defective.

Appeal by defendant from *Daniels, J.,*at February Term, 1932, of PASQUOTANK.

Civil action to recover damages for alleged breach of contract. Denial of liability interposed and counterclaim set up by defendant.

It appearing that an accounting was necessary, on motion of defendant, and over objection of plaintiff, a reference was ordered under the statute.

Both sides filed exceptions to the report of the referee, both tendered issues, and the plaintiff demanded a jury trial.

A jury trial was ordered, and upon the hearing, the plaintiff prevailed.

' From the judgment on the verdict, the defendant appeals, assigning errors.

*Ehringhaus & Hall for plaintiff.*

*J. E. LeRoy, Jr., for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

The record contains eleven assignments of error of which the second and sixth may be taken as illustrative:

Defendant assigns error:

> “2. For that the court admitted the evidence over defendant’s objection as preserved in exceptions Nos. 2 and 3 (R. pp. 3 and 6).”

> *845“6. For that the court excluded the competent and material evidence important to the defendant as specifically set out in each exception, as preserved by defendant’s exceptions Nos. 24, 25, 26, 27, 29 and 30 (E. pp. 43, 44, 45, 46, 48, 49 and 50).”

These assignments of error are defective in that they give no indication of relevancy to the controversy; nor do they show any signs of pertinency to the questions sought to be presented. *Greene v. Dishman,*202 N. C., 811; *Baker v. Clayton,*202 N. C., 741. But notwithstanding their deficiency, a careful perusal of the record leaves us with the impression that the case has been tried in substantial conformity to the decisions on the subject.

No error.
Exhibit
32.2








Certification
of CFO pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I,
Michael J. Draper, Chief Financial Officer of the general partner of the General
Partner of America First Tax Exempt Investors, L.P. (the “Company”), certify
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that:





(1)
The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m);
and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.








Date:  November
6,
2009 /s/ Michael J.
Draper


Michael
J. Draper


Chief
Financial Officer


Burlington
Capital Group LLC, acting in its capacity as general partner of the General
Partner of America First Tax Exempt Investors, L.P.








A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to America First Tax Exempt Investors, L.P. and will be retained by
America First Tax Exempt Investors, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
AMENDED AND RESTATED AMENDMENT AGREEMENT

          The undersigned,  intending legally to be bound, hereby agree that the
Amendment  Agreement between the undersigned,  dated May 20, 1997, as previously
amended, and all the exhibits thereto,  shall be amended and restated to read in
their entirety as follows and otherwise agree as follows:

          1. The  Certificate  of  Designations  for the  Series  D  Convertible
Preferred  Stock  of  Genta  Incorporated  (the  "Company")  shall  be  amended,
effective as of May 20, 1997, to read as set forth in Exhibit A hereto.

          2. The Senior Secured  Convertible Bridge Notes issued on February 13,
1997 shall be amended,  effective as of the date hereof, to read as set forth in
Exhibits B-1 and B-2 hereto.

          3. The Company's  Class A and Class B Bridge Warrants for the Purchase
of Shares of Common Stock (numbers CA-1,  CA-2,  CB-1 and CB-2) (the "Old Bridge
Warrants") shall be exchanged, effective as of the date hereof, for New Warrants
(the "New Bridge Warrants") which,  notwithstanding  the provisions of Section 9
of the Bridge  Warrants,  shall read in their  entirety as set forth in Exhibits
CA-1,  CA-2,  CB-1  and  CB-2  hereto,  and the Old  Bridge  Warrants  shall  be
cancelled.

          4. If Aries Domestic Fund, L.P. and The Aries Trust (collectively, the
"Aries Funds") purchase  securities in the Company's private placement commenced
on May 20,  1997,  then  the  Aries  Funds  will  not  vote or  dispose  of such
securities or convert any such securities  into, or exercise any such securities
for, any shares of Common Stock of the Company, for a period of 90 days from the
date of such purchase.

          5.  Except as amended  hereby and except for the  exchange  of the New
Bridge Warrants for Old Bridge Warrants, the instruments and securities referred
to herein shall continue in full force and effect.

          6. This agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of
which shall be deemed an original,  but all of which shall  together  constitute
one and the same instrument.

<PAGE>


          IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the parties hereto have executed this Amended and
Restated Amendment Agreement as of June 23, 1997.


                         GENTA INCORPORATED


                         -------------------------------------
                         By:



                         THE ARIES FUND, A CAYMAN ISLAND TRUST



                         By: its Investment Manager, PARAMOUNT
                         CAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC.


                         By: 
                         ----------------------------
                             Name:  Lindsay A. Rosenwald, M.D.
                             Title: President



                         THE ARIES DOMESTIC FUND, L.P.



                         By: its General Partner, PARAMOUNT
                         CAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC.


                         By: 
                         ----------------------------
                             Name:  Lindsay A. Rosenwald, M.D.
                             Title: President
#### Susan Pettit, Respondent, v. Asa Pettit, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, without costs. Opinions by

Brady, J.,

and by Davis, P. J., dissenting.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-11-00809-CV

David Chestnut, Appellant

v.

JRSW1, Ltd, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY,

NO. C-1-CV-11-009527, HONORABLE J. DAVID PHILLIPS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

David Chestnut has failed to prosecute his appeal. Appellant’s brief was due

June 4, 2012. On July 30, 2012, this Court’s clerk sent Chestnut a notice informing him that his

brief was overdue and cautioned that his appeal could be dismissed for want of prosecution unless

Chestnut filed a response reasonably explaining his failure to file a brief. That response was due by

August 9, 2012. Chestnut has not responded to the notice, nor has he filed a brief. Accordingly, we

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c).
_____________________________________________

J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: August 22, 2012

2
ex_457642.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


 


Date: December 15, 2022


From: Chad Hoehne, CEO, President & Chairman


To: Robert Siqveland, Secretary & COO


 


Mr. Siqveland,


 


As part of a larger restructuring of roles surrounding the operations management of the Company and with grateful recognition of your 27 years of service to Table Trac, Inc. which you have served as Investor Relations, General Sales and Marketing Manager, Salesperson, Corporate Secretary, Compliance Manager, Advisor to the Board and Chief Operations Officer, Table Trac is offering you the following incentives in exchange for separation from employment.


	 	
			●

				
			Your role with Table Trac is available to you through March 31, 2023. These incentives are yours at the execution of this document. You will receive twelve months of severance based on your current base salary (exclusive of any bonus) to begin on the April 1, 2023. Your severance will be paid in two installments as follows: 75% on April 15, 2023. 25% on January 15, 2024, subject to your continued compliance with Company policies.

			



 


	 	
			●

				
			Acceleration of the vesting in stock options and restricted shares previously awarded to you as follows:

			



 


	 	
			o

				
			20,000 shares of stock options were awarded to you on May 14, 2021. All of these options will be 100% vested as of December 15, 2022. In addition, Section 3 of your Stock Option agreement has been modified to allow 12 months from March 31, 2023 to be exercised.

			



 


	 	
			o

				
			12,500 shares of Restricted Stock Shares were awarded to you on March 25, 2022 of 12,500. As of December 15th, 2022 these shares will be 100% vested.

			



 


	/s/ Chad Hoehne	 	12/15/2022	 
	Chad Hoehne President and CEO 	 	Date	 
	 	 	 	 
	Accepted	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Robert Siqveland	 	12/19/2022	 
	Robert Siqveland	 	Date	 



 


 


 






6101 Baker Road Suite 206 Minnetonka, MN 55345
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 245 (Thursday, December 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 66324]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31055]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Industrial Macromolecular Crystallography 
Association

    Notice is hereby given that, on January 19, 1995, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Industrial Macromolecular 
Crystallography Association (``IMCA'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, G.D. Searle and Company, Skokie, IL; and 
Sanofi Winthrop, Inc., New York, NY have become members of IMCA. 
Monsanto Company and Sterling Drug, Inc. have withdrawn as members.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and IMCA intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On October 23, 1990, IMCA filed its original notification pursuant 
to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on 
December 3, 1990 (55 FR 49953).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on March 3, 
1993. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on March 30, 1993 (58 FR 16707).
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 95-31055 Filed 12-20-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 28 (Friday, February 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7959]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3319]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-153-000]


East Tennessee Natural Gas Co., Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

February 6, 1995.
    Take notice that on February 2, 1995, East Tennessee Natural Gas 
Company (East Tennessee), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following sheets and requested 
effective dates:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                   Tariff sheet                        Effective date   
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Third Substitute Original Sheet No. 4.............  Nov. 1, 1993.       
Second Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 4.......  Jan. 1, 1994        
Substitute Second Revised Sheet No. 4.............  Oct. 1, 1994        
Substitute Third Revised Sheet No. 4..............  Nov. 1, 1994.       
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    East Tennessee states that it is making this filing pursuant to its 
Rate Schedule LMS-MA, Section 1.5 which requires East Tennessee to 
reflect in its no-notice, Daily Demand Service (DDS) rates changes in 
the Daily Demand Service rates of its upstream transporter, Tennessee 
Gas Pipeline Company (Tennessee). East Tennessee further states that 
consistent with that language, East Tennessee seeks to revise its Daily 
Variance Charge. The revised tariff sheets reflect the increase in 
Tennessee's Rate Schedule LMS-MA Daily Demand Service and Daily 
Variance Charge rates pursuant to Tennessee's implementation of its 
cost of service settlement in Docket Nos. RP91-203, RP92-132 and RS92-
23 (consolidated).
    East Tennessee states that copies of the filing have been mailed to 
all affected customers and state regulatory commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with 
reference to said filing should file a petition to intervene or protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 211 and 
214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211 
and 385.214. All such petitions or protests should be filed on or 
before February 13, 1995. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to this proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a petition to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file and available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-3319 Filed 2-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Year Cost Rate

Income 

Rate

Annual 

Balance

2005 11.13 12.72 1.59 320

2006 11.00 12.73 1.73 337

2007 10.95 12.74 1.79 355

2008 10.99 12.78 1.80 370

2009 11.13 12.77 1.65 383

2010 11.25 12.79 1.54 394

2011 11.42 12.84 1.42 404

2012 11.67 12.87 1.21 410

2013 11.93 12.90 0.98 415

2014 12.20 12.92 0.72 418

2015 12.46 12.94 0.48 419

2016 12.73 12.95 0.22 418

2017 13.01 12.97 -0.04 416

2018 13.29 12.99 -0.30 412

2019 13.56 13.01 -0.55 407

2020 13.83 13.02 -0.81 401

2021 14.10 13.04 -1.05 394

2022 14.35 13.06 -1.29 386

2023 14.59 13.07 -1.52 377

2024 14.83 13.09 -1.74 366

2025 15.06 13.10 -1.96 355

2026 15.28 13.11 -2.17 343

2027 15.47 13.13 -2.35 331

2028 15.64 13.14 -2.50 317

2029 15.78 13.15 -2.63 304

2030 15.90 13.16 -2.74 290

2031 16.00 13.17 -2.83 276

2032 16.07 13.17 -2.90 262

2033 16.12 13.18 -2.94 247

2034 16.13 13.18 -2.95 233

2035 16.13 13.18 -2.95 219

2036 16.11 13.19 -2.93 204

2037 16.08 13.19 -2.89 190

2038 16.02 13.18 -2.84 176

2039 15.96 13.18 -2.77 161

2040 15.88 13.18 -2.70 147

2041 15.81 13.18 -2.63 133

2042 15.73 13.18 -2.56 120

2043 15.66 13.17 -2.48 106

2044 15.58 13.17 -2.41 92

2045 15.51 13.17 -2.34 79

2046 15.44 13.16 -2.27 65

2047 15.37 13.16 -2.20 52

2048 15.30 13.16 -2.14 39

2049 15.23 13.16 -2.08 26

2050 15.18 13.16 -2.02 13

2051 15.12 13.15 -1.97 ----

2052 15.07 13.15 -1.92 ----

2053 15.03 13.15 -1.88 ----

2054 14.98 13.15 -1.83 ----

2055 14.94 13.15 -1.79 ----

2056 14.90 13.15 -1.76 ----

2057 14.87 13.15 -1.73 ----

2058 14.84 13.14 -1.69 ----

2059 14.80 13.14 -1.66 ----

2060 14.77 13.14 -1.63 ----

2061 14.74 13.14 -1.60 ----

2062 14.71 13.14 -1.57 ----

2063 14.69 13.14 -1.55 ----

2064 14.66 13.14 -1.52 ----

2065 14.64 13.14 -1.50 ----

2066 14.61 13.14 -1.48 ----

2067 14.59 13.14 -1.45 ----

2068 14.56 13.14 -1.43 ----

2069 14.53 13.14 -1.40 ----

2070 14.50 13.13 -1.37 ----

2071 14.47 13.13 -1.34 ----

2072 14.44 13.13 -1.31 ----

2073 14.40 13.13 -1.27 ----

2074 14.37 13.13 -1.24 ----

2075 14.33 13.13 -1.21 ----

2076 14.30 13.13 -1.18 ----

2077 14.27 13.12 -1.15 ----

2078 14.24 13.12 -1.12 ----

2079 14.21 13.12 -1.09 ----

2080 14.18 13.12 -1.06 ----

Summarized Rates: OASDI

2005 Cost Rate Income Rate

Actuarial 

Balance

-2079 14.29% 13.80% -0.50% 1.43%

Office of the Chief Actuary, Social Security

Estimates based on Intermediate Assumptions of the 2005 Trustees Report January 4, 2006

Detailed Single Year Tables

Category of Change: Level of Monthly Benefits (PIA)

Change in 

Actuarial Balance

Proposed Provision: Progressive price indexing of PIA formula factors beginning with individuals 

newly eligible for OASDI benefits in 2012. Create new bend point at the 30th percentile of earners. 

Maintain current-law benefits for earners at the 30th percentile and below and reduce upper 2 formula 

factors (32% and 15%) such that maximum worker benefit grows by inflation rather than the growth in 

average wages.

Expressed as a percentage of taxable payroll Trust Fund 

Ratio 

1-1-year
#### TOM GALLOS and wife, RITA A. GALLOS v. PHILLIP LUCAS and wife, ANNABELLE LUCAS.

(Filed 4 May, 1960.)

Mortgages § 30—

Tlie fact tliat the trustee’s sale upon foreclosure of a deed of trust was not reported within five days as directed by G.S. 45-21.26 does not deprive the clerk of jurisdiction to thereafter order a resale based on a raised bid, G.S. 45-21.29, and the purchaser at the resale acquires title upon the execution of deed to him, the foreclosure being- regular in all other respects.

Appeal by defendants from *Crissman, J.,*November 9, 1959 Civil Term, of Guilford (High Point Division).

Plaintiffs allege they are the owners of lands in High Point wrongfully occupied by defendants. The determinative facts were stipulated. Defendants, owners of the land, conveyed the same in trust to secure their note. They failed to pay their debt, and, upon demand of the creditor, the trustee advertised and sold the property on 13 April 1959, at which time plaintiffs were the high bidders at the sum of $15,500. The sale so made was reported to the clerk of the Superior Court 22 April 1959.

In addition to the foregoing summarized facts, the parties stipulated: “That within ten days allowed by law an advance bid was filed with the Clerk of the Superior Court of Guilford County, North Carolina, and an order issued by said court directing said substituted *481trustee to resell said properties described hereinbefore; that after due advertisement a re-sale was had at public auction to the highest bidder for cash at the front door of the county building in the City of High Point, North Carolina, on May 15, 1959, when and where Tom Gallos became the last and highest bidder at the price of $16,-350.00 and made a cash deposit as required by law; that a report of such re-sale was duly filed in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Guilford County, North Carolina, on May 19, 1959; that said matter remained open for more than ten days and no advance bid was made; that said sale was confirmed by the court and the trustee directed to execute and deliver a deed to said Tom Gallos or his nominee upon receipt of the purchase price; that said purchase price was paid and a deed in fee simple to the properties described heretofore was executed to the plaintiffs on June 5th, 1959; that a copy of said deed is attached hereto marked ‘Exhibit A’ and made a part of this Agreed Statement of Facts.”

The court adjudged plaintiffs the owners and defendants appealed.

*Louis J. Fisher for plaintiff appellees.*

*Morgan, Byerly & Post for defendant appellants.*

PER Cukiam.

Determinative of the appeal is this question: Did the failure to report the sale made 13 April 1959 within five days as directed by G.S. 45-21.26 render the subsequent sale void? The answer is no.

If a trustee fails to report within the five days directed by the statute, the clerk may compel a report. G.S. 45-21.14. When the clerk assumes jurisdiction and orders a resale based on a raised bid, his orders are not void. One who purchases and receives a deed for the property pursuant to such orders acquires a good title. G.S. 45-21.29.

Affirmed.
## Detailed Single Year Tables

- Individual Provisions
- Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable)

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						E3.5: Increase the taxable maximum each year by an additional 2 percent beginning in 2024 until taxable earnings equal 90 percent of covered earnings. Provide benefit credit for earnings up to the revised taxable maximum.**

### Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program

### Summarized Estimates
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Premiere Global Services, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) Nos. 333-79599, 333-87635, 333-89891, 333-51380, 333-57698, 333-67292,333-101262, 333-116506, and 333-151962 on Form S-8 of our reports dated February 26, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of the Company, and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reportingincluded in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

 Atlanta, GeorgiaFebruary 26, 2010

----
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members         
    -  AEE Multimedia 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# PHOTOS ANDVIDEOS

Search

Search

                                - All Images 
                                - Other 
                                - Space Shuttle 

                                - Upload Date
                                - Photo Date
                                - Title

----

Download Image: Full Size (1.37 MB)

Tags:USSPACECOM, Global Sentinel, GS24

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery