alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# PHOTOS ANDVIDEOS

Search

Search

                                - All Images 
                                - Other 
                                - Space Shuttle 

                                - Upload Date
                                - Photo Date
                                - Title

----

Download Image: Full Size (1.41 MB)

Tags:Space Symposium, USSPACECOM

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.2

                            ALLEGIANCE TELECOM, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (LOSS)
                         SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2001
                (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                     Number of          Percent           Equivalent
                                                      Shares          Outstanding           Shares
                                                     ---------        -----------         ----------
<S>                                                  <C>              <C>                 <C>

Prior to Initial Public Offering
   1997 Common Stock Offering                               639          100.00%                 639

After Initial Public Offering
   1998 Common Stock Offering                        15,000,000          100.00%          15,000,000
   Preferred Stock Converted to Common Stock         60,511,692          100.00%          60,511,692
   1999 Common Stock Offering                        21,041,100          100.00%          21,041,100
   2000 Common Stock Offering                        10,703,109          100.00%          10,703,109
   Cash in Lieu of Stock Split                             (577)         100.00%                (577)
   Treasury Shares                                     (327,495)         100.00%            (327,495)
   Warrants Exercised                                   765,833          100.00%             765,833
   Stock Options Exercised                            1,162,130           89.21%           1,036,772
   Employee Stock Discount Purchase Plan Shares
     Issued                                             429,261           87.26%             374,554
   Common Stock Issued for Business Acquisitions      3,630,655           74.21%           2,694,197
                                                                                        ------------

   WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING                                                   111,799,824

   NET LOSS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK                                                 $(199,678,000)

   NET LOSS PER SHARE, BASIC AND DILUTED                                               $       (1.79)
                                                                                       =============

</Table>
#### JAMES E. WILSON v. J. K. BEASLEY and WILLIE BEASLEY.

(Filed 29 September, 1926.)

Appeal and Error — Reference — Objections and Exceptions — Rules of Court.

On appeal to the Supreme Court from tbe action of the Superior Court judge in passing upon the report of a referee, the facts found and the conclusions of law by the lower court must be regularly stated with the exceptions thereto in the record of the case on appeal. Rule 19(3), 21, 185 N. C., pp. 794, 795.

*232Appeal by defendants from *Lyon, J.,*at January Special Term, 1926, of Joi-iNstoN. Affirmed.

*E. 8. Abel, J ames Raynor and, Clifford & Townsend for plaintiff.*

*James Best for defendants.*

Pee OueiaM.

This Court will not review exceptions to • a referee’s report unless they are passed upon by the court below, and the rulings of the court below are especially assigned as error in the transcript on appeal to the Supreme Court.

Exceptions and assignments of error relied upon on appeal to the Supreme Court should be taken and stated in the record to findings of fact and conclusions of law made by the court below. Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, Rule 19(3) and 21, 185 N. C., p. 194-5.

On the present record this was not done. There is no evidence in the •record. From the record the only assignment of error from the Rules that we can consider is to the judgment of the court below, to which exception and assignment of error is made to this Court. This was a consent reference. As to reserving trial by jury in compulsory references, see *Jenkins v. Parker, ante,*188.

From the findings of fact by the court below, we can discover no reversible or prejudicial error on the record. Therefore the judgment of the court below is

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NewCom International, Inc., a
Delaware corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March
31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Walter Grieves, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

         1.       The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information  contained in the report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Walter Grieves
----------------------------------------
Walter Grieves, Chief Executive Officer
October 23, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 9, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 6850]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02499]



[[Page 6850]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER16-855-000]


Escalante Solar I, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Escalante Solar I, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes 
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is February 23, 2016.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the 
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an 
eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive 
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). 
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#87c1c2d5c4c8e9ebeee9e2d4f2f7f7e8f5f3c7e1e2f5e4a9e0e8f1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e1a7a4b3a2ae8f8d888f84b29491918e9395a187849382cf868e97">[email protected]</span></a>. or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: February 3, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-02499 Filed 2-8-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.2

STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
OF PREMIERE GLOBAL SERVICES, INC.
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Premiere Global Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), the undersigned Michael E. Havener, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| | /s/ Michael E. Havener                                                                     
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                                            
| | Michael E. Havener
Chief Financial Officer
Premiere Global Services, Inc.
January 30,  2009

---
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

VICTOR ROLLE,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 5D17-0067

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

________________________________/

Opinion filed March 31, 2017

Petition for Belated Appeal

A Case of Original Jurisdiction. 

Victor Rolle, Crawfordville, pro se. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General 

Tallahassee, and, Kaylee Tatman,

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Respondent. 

PER CURIAM. 

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed

with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the September 9, 2016

judgments and sentences in Case No. 2015-CF-9466-A-O, in the Circuit Court in and 

for Orange County, Florida. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D). 

PETITION GRANTED.

PALMER and BERGER, JJ., and JACOBUS, B.W., Senior Judge, concur.
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 -0.01 -0.01 -0% -0%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

September 15, 2023

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Family Members

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: D3. Allow divorced aged spouses and divorced surviving spouses married 5 to 9 

years to get benefits based on the former spouse's account. Divorced aged and surviving spouses would 

receive 50% of the applicable current-law PIA percentage if married 5 years, 60% of the applicable PIA 

percentage if married 6 years, ..., 90% of the applicable PIA percentage if married 9 years. This benefit 

would be available to divorced spouses on the rolls at the beginning of 2025 and those becoming eligible 

after 2024.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1996
<CASH>                                           2,852
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      632
<ALLOWANCES>                                       232
<INVENTORY>                                         36
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,319
<PP&E>                                              25
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,344
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              157
<BONDS>                                              7
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,166
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,344
<SALES>                                         23,637
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,747
<CGS>                                           20,866
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,866
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,833
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 723
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,675)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,675)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,288
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,387)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.11)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to
the  incorporation by reference in Registration  Statement  Nos. 33-72130, 33-58362,
333-3846, 333-35215,  333-40634,  333-50330 and  333-75134 of Genta  Incorporated on Form
S-3 and Registration  Statement  Nos.  33-85887,  333-94181,  333-94185  and  333-101022
of  Genta  Incorporated  on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 14, 2005,  relating  to
the  consolidated  financial  statements  of Genta  Incorporated  and  subsidiaries,  and
managements  report on the effectiveness of internal  control  over  financial
reporting  appearing  and  incorporated  by  reference in the Annual  Report on Form 10-K
of Genta  Incorporated  for  the year ended December 31, 2004.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE
LLP

Parsippany, New
JerseyMarch 14, 2005

71

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1864

JAMES AUSTIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RICHARD FOSTER; JOHN KELLY; ROCKY HAYNES, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofSouth Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-98-3811-0-17) Submitted: January 23, 2001 Decided: February 15, 2001 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.J. Dennis Bolt, BOLT LAW FIRM, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. J. Rene Josey, United States Attorney, Barbara M. Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). 2 PER CURIAM: James Austin appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his Bivens* action based upon his treatment as an employee of theUnited States Postal Service and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Austin v. Foster , No. CA-98- 3811-0-17 (D.S.C. May 19 & June 9, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
2005 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit 5-20-2005 

# U SA v . O t e ro P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 02-2624

F o l low thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : http://d i git alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2005

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou ght t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c ept e d for inclusion in 2005 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Re posit or y

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j amin . C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du . Re c omme nde d C it at ion " U SA v . Ot e r o " (2005). 2005 D e cisio n s . P ape r 1084. http://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2005/1084U N IT E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT N os . 01- 2468 & 02- 2624

_____ UNI TE D ST ATE S OF AM ERI CA

v. HE RB E RT L . BE NDOL P H,

A ppel l antatN o. 01- 2468

_____ UNI TE D ST ATE S OF AM ERI CA

v. J UL I O OT E RO ,

A ppel l antatN o. 02- 2624

_____ O n A p p ea l from the U n it ed S tat es D istri ct C o u rt

fo r th e D istri ct of

D elaw are ( D . C . N o. 95- cr - 00068) D i s t r i ctJ udge: H onor abl e Sue L. R obi ns on O n A p p ea l from the U n it ed S tat es D istri ct C o u rt f o r th e M id d le D istric t o f P e n n sy lv a n ia ( D . C . N o. 96- cr - 00005- 3) D i s t r i ctJ udge: H onor abl e Sy l vi a H . R ambo

_____ A r gued O ct ober26, 2004 R ear gued En B anc February23, 2005 OR DE R A M E NDI NG OP I NI ON

_____ P e r th e d ire c tio n o f

th e C o u rt, fo o tn o te # 3 o f th e o p in io n f

iled o n M a y1 6 , 2 0 0 5 isam end ed as fo l l ow s:

A l t hough t he courtm ayactupon w hatpl ai nl yappea r s fr om t he mot i on, at t ache d exhi bi t s and r ecor d, notal l l i m i t at i ons i s s ues m ayappea ri n s uch m anner . A s s uch, not i ce a nd an oppor tuni t yt o r es pond s houl d be af for ded d u ri n g th e R u le 4 s ta g e . See footnot e 15 i nfr a . Fur t her m or e, as i tappea r s t hatt he j udgm entand mandat e cont ai ned a c l er i cal err or i n t hatt hos e document s i ncorr ect l ys t at e thatappea l atN o. 02- 2624 or i gi nat ed fr om t he U ni t ed St at es D i s t r i ctC our tfort he D i s t r i ctof D el aw ar e an a m ended j udgm entand m an d ate sh all b e issu ed co rrecti n g the c leri ca l error. F o r th e C o u rt, / s /M ar ci a M . W al dr on C lerk D at e: M ay20, 2005 cl c\ cc: D avi d R . Fi ne, E s q. R ober tA . L aw t on, E s q. M ar s ha A . Saj er , E s q. M i chae l W i s eman, E s q. R i char d G . A ndr ew s , E s q. M i chae l J . B r es ni ck, E s q. W i l l i am A . B ehe, E s q. T heodor e B . Sm i t h I I I , E s q.