alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 9, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6856-6857]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02502]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER16-858-000]


Granite Mountain Solar East, LLC; Supplemental Notice That 
Initial Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 
204 Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Granite Mountain Solar East, LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is February 23, 2016.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the

[[Page 6857]]

eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the 
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an 
eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive 
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). 
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#25636077666a4b494c4b40765055554a575165434057460b424a53"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e2a4a7b0a1ad8c8e8b8c87b19792928d9096a284879081cc858d94">[email protected]</span></a>. or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: February 3, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-02502 Filed 2-8-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### MRS. A. D. N. HUNTER, Trustee of the Estate of R. N. HUNTER, Deceased, et al., v. McCLUNG REALTY COMPANY, J. W. McCLUNG, and J. W. McCLUNG, JR.

(Filed 29 April, 1936.)

Usury B c—

The statutory penalty for usury may *not*be recovered against' the payee of notes secured by deed of trust upon evidence showing that a certain sum was paid the trustee in the deed of trust, but not paid to or received by the payee of the notes.

Appeal by defendants from *Moore, Special Judge,*at February Term, 1936, of MecKLENbubu.

No error.

This is an action to recover on notes executed by the defendant Mc-Clung Realty Company, a corporation, and endorsed by the defendants J. W. McClung and J. W. McClung, Jr., and for the foreclosure of the deed of trust by which the said notes are secured. The notes sued on are payable to the order of the Independence Trust Company and Mrs. *92A. D. N. Hunter, executors of R. N. Hunter, deceased, and are now owned by Mrs. A. D. N. Hunter, trustee of tbe estate of R. N. Hunter, deceased, and tbe Independence Corporation.

At tbe trial tbe defendants admitted tbe execution of tbe notes, as alleged in tbe complaint, and relied upon tbe plea of usury, as alleged in tbeir answer.

Tbe issue submitted to tbe jury was answered as follows:

“In wbat amount, if any, are tbe defendants indebted to tbe plaintiffs ? Answer: ‘$10,000, with interest from 17 March, 1933.’ ”

From judgment in accordance with tbe verdict, tbe defendants appealed to tbe Supreme Court, assigning errors in tbe trial.

*Stancill & Davis for plaintiffs.*

*H. L. Taylor for defendants.*

Per Curiam.

There was no evidence at the trial of this action tending to show that the payees of the notes sued on received from the defendants interest at a rate in excess of six per centum per annum, or that they charged the defendants interest on said notes at such rate, and thereby became liable for the statutory penalties for usury. C. S., 2306.

All the evidence showed that the sum of $217.50 was paid by the defendants to the Independence Trust Company, and that said sum was not paid to or received by the executors of R. N. Hunter, deceased, to whom the notes are payable.

For that reason, there was no error in the refusal of the court to submit to the jury the issue tendered by the defendants, or in the peremptory charge of the court to the jury on the issue submitted by the court.

The judgment is affirmed.

No error.
NO. 07-11-00185-CR 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

AT AMARILLO 

PANEL A 

DECEMBER 14, 2011 

CLINTON RAY WALL, APPELLANT 

v. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

 FROM THE 242ND DISTRICT COURT OF HALE COUNTY; 

NO. B18690-1101; HONORABLE EDWARD LEE SELF, JUDGE 

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Appellant, Clinton Ray Wall, was convicted of theft after having been twice before 

convicted of the offense of theft.1 Appellant pleaded true to two prior felony 

enhancements.2

 The jury assessed appellant’s punishment at confinement in the 

Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (ID-TDCJ) for a term 

of 15 years. Appellant perfected this appeal. We affirm. 

 1

 See TEXAS PENAL CODE ANN. § 31.03(e)(4)(D) (West Supp. 2011). 

2

 See TEXAS PENAL CODE ANN. § 12.42 (West Supp. 2011). 
2 

 Appellant=s attorney has filed an Anders brief and a motion to withdraw. Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed. 2d 498 (1967). In support of his 

motion to withdraw, counsel certifies that he has diligently reviewed the record, and in 

his opinion, the record reflects no reversible error upon which an appeal can be 

predicated. Id. at 744-45. In compliance with High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 813 

(Tex.Crim.App. 1978), counsel has candidly discussed why, under the controlling 

authorities, there is no error in the trial court=s judgment. Additionally, counsel has 

certified that he has provided appellant a copy of the Anders brief and motion to 

withdraw and appropriately advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response in this 

matter. Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991). The court has 

also advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response. Appellant has not filed a 

response. 

By his Anders brief, counsel raises grounds that could possibly support an 

appeal, but concludes the appeal is frivolous. We have reviewed these grounds and 

made an independent review of the entire record to determine whether there are any 

arguable grounds which might support an appeal. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 

109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988); Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 

(Tex.Crim.App. 2005). We have found no such arguable grounds and agree with 

counsel that the appeal is frivolous. 
3 

Accordingly, counsel=s motion to withdraw is hereby granted and the trial court=s 

judgment is affirmed. 3

 

 Mackey K. Hancock 

 Justice 

Do not publish. 

 3

Counsel shall, within five days after this opinion is handed down, send his client 

a copy of the opinion and judgment, along with notification of appellant=s right to file a 

pro se petition for discretionary review. See TEX. R. APP. P. 48.4.
IN THE 

FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS 

OF TEXAS 

JESUS GONZALES § CASE NO. _______________ 

§ 

§ 

VS. § On Appeal From Harris County

§ Cause No. 1351489

§ 184th District Court

THE STATE OF TEXAS § 

APPELLANT’S MOTION 

TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE NOTICE OF APPEAL

Appellant, Jesus Gonzales, moves for an extension of time to file notice of 

appeal, under TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b) and TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. 

I. TRIAL COURT PROCEEDINGS 

On September 1, 2015, Mr. Gonzales was sentenced to 15 years in prison after 

the court granted a motion to adjudicate guilt. On October 5, 2015, while in custody, 

he mailed a request for a lawyer to be appointed for an appeal. Counsel was appointed 

on October 15, 2015. 

II. PROCEEDINGS IN THIS COURT 

The notice of appeal was due October 1, 2015. Mr. Gonzales’ retained counsel 

did not file a notice of appeal, however, and apparently did not notify him that he did 

not file it. Appellate counsel is filing this motion within the 15 days permitted by Rule 

26.3, on the grounds that Mr. Gonzales had no way to know that his trial counsel did 

not file a notice of appeal on his behalf or to know that a notice needed to be filed at 

ACCEPTED

00000

FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

10/16/2015 10:14:59 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK
2

all. Counsel is filing motion this within a day of being appointed, in order to preserve 

Mr. Gonzales’ right to an appeal, if he has such right. Because the court’s file already 

had been sent to storage, counsel could not determine before the deadline whether or 

not Mr. Gonzales has a right to appeal. The clerk has requested the file, but counsel 

cannot wait to review it before filing this motion, because today is the last day for filing 

the notice of appeal. 

III.

In the exercise of due diligence, counsel was unable to file a timely notice of 

appeal because she was appointed after the deadline for filing it. This motion is not filed 

for purposes of delay, but so that justice may be done.

PRAYER

Appellant respectfully requests that this motion be granted and that the Court 

permit an extension of time until October 16, 2015 to file a notice of appeal.

Respectfully submitted,

ALEXANDER BUNIN

Chief Public Defender

Harris County Texas 

/s/ Cheri Duncan

______________________________

CHERI DUNCAN

Assistant Public Defender 

Harris County Texas

State Bar No. 06210500

1201 Franklin, 13th Floor

Houston Texas 77002
3

(713) 368-0016

(713) 368-9278 (Fax)

cheri.duncan@pdo.hctx.net

Attorney for Appellant,

JESUS GONZALES

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of Appellant’s Motion to Extend Time to File Notice of 

Appeal was served electronically on the Appellate Division of the Harris County 

District Attorney’s Office, 1201 Franklin St, 6th Floor, Houston, TX on October 16, 

2015.

/s/ Cheri Duncan

____________________________________

CHERI DUNCAN
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5631 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5631

To authorize the Central Everglades Planning Project, Florida, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 18, 2014

Mr. Murphy of Florida (for himself, Mr. Jolly, Mr. Hastings of Florida, 
 Ms. Wasserman Schultz, Ms. Brown of Florida, Ms. Frankel of Florida, 
 Mr. Garcia, Mr. Deutch, and Mr. Posey) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Central Everglades Planning Project, Florida, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERP, CENTRAL EVERGLADES PLANNING PROJECT, FLORIDA.

    (a) Authorization.--The project for environmental restoration, 
CERP, Central Everglades Planning Project, Florida, is authorized to be 
carried out by the Secretary of the Army substantially in accordance 
with the plans, and subject to the conditions, recommended in a final 
report of the Chief of Engineers if a favorable report of the Chief of 
Engineers is completed not later than December 30, 2015.
    (b) Total Cost.--The project authorized pursuant to paragraph (1) 
is authorized to be carried out by the Secretary of the Army at a total 
cost of $1,900,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $950,875,000 
and an estimated non-Federal cost of $949,125,000.
                                 <all>
```
### Proposed Provision: E3.2. Increase the taxable maximum such that 90 percent of earnings would be subject to the payroll tax (phased in 2024-2033). Do not provide benefit credit for additional earnings taxed.
EXHIBIT 21

Subsidiaries of the Registrant               Place of Incorporation

WPI Electronics, Inc.                        New Hampshire
WPI Instruments, Inc.                        New Hampshire
WPI Magnetec, Inc.                           New Hampshire
WPI Power Systems, Inc.                      New Hampshire
WPI Termiflex, Inc.                          New Hampshire
WPI Termiflex International Sales, Inc.      Massachusetts
WPI DecisionKey, Inc.                        New Hampshire
WPI Micro Palm,  Inc.                        New Hampshire
WPI Micro Processor Systems, Inc.            New Hampshire
WPI Oyster Termiflex Limited                 England and Wales
WPI Oyster Terminals, Inc.                   New Hampshire
WPI UK Holding, Inc.                         New Hampshire
WPI UK Holding II, Inc.                      New Hampshire
WPI Group (U.K.)                             England and Wales
WPI Group International Sales Limited        Barbados
WPI Husky Technology, Inc.                   Florida





EXHIBIT 23

          CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation of our report incorporated by reference in
this form 10-K into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statements (File Nos. 33-48285, 33-88012, 33-
80912, 33-85137, 333-28335 and 333-1696).



                                        ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
December 18, 2000
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 28 (Friday, February 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 8111]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3422]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Intelligent Transportation Society of America; Public Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Intelligent Transportation Society of America (ITS 
America) will hold a meeting of its Coordinating Council on March 15, 
1995. The session is expected to focus on: (1) Federal Intelligent 
Transportation Systems (ITS) Reports; (2) ITS America Executive 
Director's Report; (3) Discussion of a White Paper on ITS America's 
Role in Standards Development; (4) Discussion of a White Paper on an 
ITS Data Communications Strategy; (5) Report from the Policy and 
Deployment Task Force; (6) Report from the Commercial Vehicle 
Operations Committee; (7) ITS America Restructuring Report; (8) Report 
from the Benefits, Evaluation, and Costs Committee; and (9) 
Communications and Public Affairs Report. ITS America provides a forum 
for national discussion and recommendations on ITS activities including 
programs, research needs, strategic planning, standards, international 
liaison, and priorities. The charter for the utilization of ITS America 
establishes this organization as an advisory committee under the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. app. 2, when it 
provides advice or recommendations to DOT officials on ITS policies and 
programs. (56 FR 9400, March 6, 1991).
DATES: The Coordinating Council of ITS America will meet on March 15, 
1995, from 8 a.m. to 11:30 a.m., e.t.

ADDRESSES: The Sheraton Washington Hotel, 2660 Woodley Road, NW., 
Washington, D.C. 20008, (202) 328-2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Materials associated with this meeting 
may be examined at the offices of ITS America, 400 Virginia Avenue, 
SW., Suite 800, Washington, D.C. 20024. Persons desiring further 
information or wishing to speak at this meeting should contact Mr. 
Chris Body at ITS America by telephone at (202) 484-4131, or by FAX at 
(202) 484-3483. The DOT contact is Mr. Gary Euler, FHWA, HVH-1, 400 
Seventh St., SW., Washington, D.C. 20590, (202) 366-2201. Office hours 
are from 7:45 a.m. to 4:15 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday, except 
for Federal holidays.

(23 U.S.C. 315; 49 CFR 1.48)

    Issued on: February 3, 1995.
Rodney E. Slater,
Federal Highway Administrator.
[FR Doc. 95-3422 Filed 2-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-16-00403-CR

EX PARTE ROBERTO GOMEZ

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR4115

Honorable Andrew Carruthers, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE ANGELINI, AND JUSTICE BARNARD

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED AS MOOT.

SIGNED October 5, 2016.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
Exhibit 23.3








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ENGINEERS





As independent engineering consultants, Ryder Scott Company, LP hereby consents to the use of our report entitled “Southwest Royalties, Inc., Estimated Future Reserves and Income Attributable to Certain Leasehold and Royalty Interests, SEC Parameters, as of December 31, 2009” dated January 26, 2010 and data extracted therefrom (and all references to our Firm) included in or made a part of this Form 10-KA Annual Report to be filed on or about December 20, 2010 and to the incorporation by reference of this Form 10-KA Annual Report (including the use of our report and references to our Firm herein) into that certain Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed by Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission, file number 333-116825, and those certain Registration Statements on Form S-8 filed by Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission, file numbers 33-68320, 33-68316, 33-69688, and 33-92834 covering the Bonus Incentive Plan of Clayton Williams Energy, Inc., Outside Directors Stock Option Plan of Clayton Williams Energy, Inc., Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. 401(k) Plan & Trust, and the Executive Incentive Stock Compensation Plan of Clayton Williams Energy, Inc., respectively.

















/s/ RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, LP


TBPE Firm Registration No. F-1580





Houston, Texas


December 20, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 239 (Wednesday, December 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64018-64019]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30280]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Initiation of New Shipper Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of initiation of new shipper antidumping duty 
administrative review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) has received a 
request to conduct a new shipper administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order on fresh and chilled Atlantic salmon from Norway 
with an October semi-annual anniversary date. In accordance with the 
Commerce Regulations, we are initiating this administrative review.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 13, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Todd Peterson or Thomas Futtner, Office of Antidumping Compliance, 
Import Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. 20230, telephone (202) 482-
4195/3814.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The Department has received a request, in accordance with 19 CFR 
353.22(h) (1995), for a new shipper review of an antidumping duty order 
with an October semi-annual anniversary date.

Initiation of Reviews

    In accordance with 19 CFR 353.22(h), we are initiating one new 
shipper review of the antidumping duty order on fresh and chilled 
Atlantic salmon from Norway. We intend to issue the final results of 
this review not later than August 15, 1996.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                         Period to be   
             Antidumping duty proceeding                   reviewed     
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Norway:                                                                 
  Fresh and Chilled Atlantic Salmon, A-403-801,                         
   Nordic Group A/L.................................     5/1/95-10/31/95
------------------------------------------------------------------------


[[Page 64019]]


    Concurrent with publication of this notice, we will instruct the 
Customs Service to allow, at option of the importer, the posting, until 
the completion of the review, of a bond or security in lieu of a cash 
deposit for each entry of merchandise (19 CFR 353.22(h)(4)).
    Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under 
administrative protective orders in accordance with 19 CFR 353.34(b).
    This initiation and notice are in accordance with section 751(a) of 
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)) and 19 CFR 
353.22(h).
    This notice is published pursuant to 19 CFR 353.22(h).

    Dated: November 29, 1995.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Compliance.
[FR Doc. 95-30280 Filed 12-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-M
EXHIBIT
      23.1








**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
      Form
      S-8 (Nos. 33-88442, 33-99196, 33-94974, 333-65799, 333-36159, 333-82418, and
      333-82416) and on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-90017, 333-76614, 333-92174 and
      333-102334) of Acorn Factor Inc. (formally Data Systems & Software Inc.) of
      our report dated April 11, 2006 except for Note 4 as to which the date is
      October 18, 2006, relating to the financial statements and financial statement
      schedules, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.








/s/
      Kesselman & Kesselman


Certified
      Public Accountants


A
      member
      of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited








Tel
      Aviv,
      Israel


October
      18, 2006
### Proposed Provision: E1.1. Increase the payroll tax rate (currently 12.4 percent) to 16.2 percent in 2024 and later.