alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable) | Description of Proposed Provision:      Beginning in 2010, make all earnings subject to the payroll tax (but retain the current-law taxable maximum for benefit calculations). |
|-------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                           |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2009 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified August 31, 2009 |
#### FRED R. DENNIS v. FRANK DETELS.

(Filed 9 November, 1955.)

Appeal and Error § 40f—

The denial of a motion to strike will not be disturbed on appeal when it does not appear that retention of the challenged allegation will materially' prejudice defendant on the final hearing.

Appeal by defendant from *Gwyn, J.,*April Term, 1955, of Stanly.

Civil action to recover damages to person and property, growing out of a collision on 10 July, 1954, at the intersection of U. S. Highway 52 *112and N. C. Highway 49, near Richfield, Stanly County, allegedly caused by the negligence of defendant.

Defendant, in apt time, filed motion under G.S. 1-153 to strike as irrelevant and redundant designated allegations of the complaint.

After hearing in due course, Judge Gwyn entered an order denying defendant’s said motion. Defendant excepted and appealed, assigning as error the denial of his motion in respect to each designated allegation challenged thereby.

*R. L. Smith & Son and Morton & Williams for 'plaintiff, appellee.*

*Brown & Mauney for defendant, appellant.*

Per Cukiam.

Careful consideration of each challenged allegation fails to disclose that its retention in the complaint will materially prejudice defendant on the final hearing of this cause. Hence, Judge Gwyn’s order is

Afiirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 238 (Tuesday, December 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 63726]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30217]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDICIAL CONFERNECE OF THE UNITED STATES


Meeting of the Judicial Conference Committee on Rules of Practice 
and Procedure

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States Committee on Rules of 
Practice and Procedure.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure will meet on 
January 10, at 7 p.m., and on January 11 and 12, at 8:30 a.m. The 
meeting will be open to public observation but not participation.

DATES: January 10-12, 1996.

ADDRESSES: The Ritz-Carlton, Marina del Rey, 4375 Admiralty Way, Marina 
del Rey, California.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
John K. Rabiej, Chief, Rules Committee Support Office, Administrative 
Office of the United States Courts, Washington, DC 20544, telephone 
(202) 273-1820.

    Dated: December 6, 1995.
John K. Rabiej,
Chief, Rules Committee Support Office.
[FR Doc. 95-30217 Filed 12-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-55-M
Exhibit  32

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In  connection  with the Annual Report on Form 10KSB for the year ended June 30,
2004,  as  filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the
undersigned  in  the  capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant  to  Section  906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section
1350),  that  to  his  knowledge:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

2.  The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.

Date:  November 12,  2003
/s/Albert  Reda
Albert  R.  Reda
Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Principal  Financial  Officer


<PAGE>
**Exhibit 13.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT**

**TO SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Intertape Polymer Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gregory A.C. Yull, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: March 31, 2015
#### Robert Taylor, Respondent, v. The City of Yonkers, Appellant.

Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Barnard, P, J.
### OFFICEOF THE ATI’ORNEY GENERAL 

### OF TEXAS AUSTIN Q-GhUNN 489~reblo Dosal Allest pus 3

for hlo ~oputf40, ~pr4duo 40 flu buglary aloft, **robbory** 

### inooranu

mo6ootlng

pubdo tar, &tmll o sl x p e o 4 e o

s 4 o t m! n o u r o uy

.xp4oM.~

p m- +u4 4# t h o t l

a a lt 1 u

6 at & e 

# 4mm0 s o ma



### ho-la, WI* o mo t~ t?4 uu r u,

4 4 a o 6 y a o u t o r ,

l o e a tt r o a d 44ool 4 0 1 4 m n,

u a n P Mhu l

r u# o r a n 6 o n b o t,

ud 

### tk.huru(.- oReotoor8kU1liltnlroMka A n por t

on the ~Ildru 40 dfioU4' knd4, lal 1 uu o g 6 h 4 4 00 6 a f w a t y b 4 d r

C* r a y4rpu tl .0, se6 aal4 #rubas &all bo abJe.t to pywnt e a t l 

### i 6 h 4 f 4 4 0 o t s a il l f r l e o , I 4 & r u o 0 6 b u o l o . pro vl 4 4 a

fu 6 h 4 o m r w a 00 4 1

u 4 pro d 4 4 d

fu- t h 4r t b t u s a y

or 6 h 4 l m o4ro00

~4 ol g n ok4

l o 

### ooa ulrrynt&ortbm a foobar&thanall aoh



### ._ **bor4 @?4mhm4**  **ior ofti44r4**  **4nC t&l?**  **doputi.4 4htil**  

### bu patatram6h4caIlera1mIla oitho oou?e~* 

### . ..*

Noat?ulu .&tlrk 

### 3899(a), v. A, C. 80, a4 &nm b 1933,

### ir ulhr~MO4

OS ma60 tr Quo40, Paur OiTil Appwlo, 1066. W. (it)

97, 6 h a

o o e r t h o l d

6bot l

p e n o u w hi o h l 4ounty **oiflel41 44s**  **0 is**  **lu 44**  ~odrotioor, **Oth.? t&a**  **tho40 la**  **.4nae4-** tioawithautombUaa,ax’ o 1bit.d to 

### l tatiomow, 4-p*, $4 l e p h o n o ,

trawl* l



### xp4no40,

4nd **06h4r** 

### dmllar **a440444x7** 

### .xp aJIo u,

6 h 4 .ml 4

o f ou 6 n r r 6 i o n

l Ja r dW ge o4rl o ) r lEg o p . p ll m a

toqaalliytho (~snorol 

### langm$r**by** 

### theop44lal4 **uomr** at44 ltar 4nd t0 rertriot it4 reani~ t4 l xp4nns oi tb
saw kina ra(L olmrer64r. s&o40 tbr ru~&Uon of 6h@ Ca~oo 

### ourth4arWa60 boo8ra aooAed toalla lutal~bondpromlum~eaou*

Artiokr $883 es4 369A foroon'~ Ansot4tod f'4xn8 Cltll ~atateo, rood a8 #sr) a8 Zollarol

aIko4pt l otbarri40 proridd **in** thlis Aot, 

### th,annaal

fuu 6hot

my be retalneb by preeitwt, 4044ty **and** dirtriot l rsisu0 m3snti080a

in ChL 

### AYtlOlo 

### dltilbe a* r0uart 

### ml* In ooaotl4r 

### ealmlai 3 Westy 

### firm (25,000) **6houmad** Or 140~ **%Oh~bitiDtil** 4uaty aag4, Dlotr1.t 4r crtolrml Distrl46 At6arn4y, ~h*riir, Oounty **Clerk ‘**  **Couoty Attomrf,**  Dbtrl4t Ci4ti, Tax OoU.Otor, **Tu A444r44r**  **or the**  **Aouaoor aod**  **Oolloator oi**  **‘ -il.**  

### nwmty-four

&ndre4 (t2J&O.001

Dollars eeaht

. . .
### Proposed Provision: G7. Invest 25 percent of the OASI and DI Trust Fund reserves in equities (phased in 2026-2035), assuming an ultimate 2.3 percent annual real rate of return on equities. Thus, the ultimate rate of return on equities is the same as that assumed for Trust Fund bonds.
EXHIBIT
      4.29


[LOGO]





*Via
      Courier and Facsimile: 44 (1744)-613329*


March
      31,
      2005





Janet
      M.
      Lockie





Pilkington
      plc


Group
      Legal Function, 10th Floor


Prescoat
      Road, St. Helens


Merseyside
      WA103TT


England





Dear
      Janet:





Pursuant
      to our recent conversation, Vitro Vidrio y Cristal, SA de C.V., (i) as successor
      to Vitro Flotado, SA de C.V. (“VIFLOSA”) and consequently as Licensee in the
      April 1, 1999 Float Licence and Whole Line Technical Assistance Agreement by
      and
      between Pilkington PLC and and VIFLOSA and (ii) as successor to Vidrio Plano
      de
      México SA de C.V. (VIPLAMEX”) and consequently as Licensee in the April 1, 1999
      Float Licence and Whole Line Technical Assistance Agreement by and between
      Pilkington PLC and VIPLAMEX hereby proposes to extend the duration of both
      Agreements, including any amendments thereto and applicable Side Letters, for
      a
      period of nine (9) months from the date hereof, agreeing to maintain in effect
      and the validity of all of the other existing terms and conditions set forth
      in
      such Agreements. Consequently upon Pilkington’s acknowledgement and agreement to
      this proposal, the definition of “Term of the Agreement” (Article I, Section O.)
      would read as follows:




*“O.
      Term of the Agreement” means the period commencing on 1* *st* *April, 1999 and ending on 31* *st* *December, 2005 (or ending on such earlier date on which this Agreement may
      be
      terminated as herein provided).”*




Consistent
      with the terms of Article VII Section D of the Agreements, we are confident
      that
      this proposed extension will allow both parties to duly evaluate and analyze
      such Agreements, and enable us to eventually agree on any adjustments that
      may
      be required or recommended for a possible extension, amendment or even an
      entirely new agreement




Please
      sign or have an authorized person sign this letter to evidence Pilkington plc’s
      agreement with this extension proposal of the Agreements of reference through
      December 31,2005.




Sincerely,









/s/
                Miguel
                Gutierrez
            /s/
                Eduardo
                PortilloMiguel
                Gutierrez M. de E.
              Vitro
                Vidrio y Cristal, S.A. de C.V.
            Eduardo
                Portillo
              Vitro
                Vidrio y Cristal, S.A. de C.V.





Acknowledge
      and agreed by Pilkington plc,






/s/
                Gerry
                GrayBy:Gerry
                Gray
              Date:7
                April 2005
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 237 (Monday, December 11, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 63573]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30211]








FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE BOARD

Announcing an Open Meeting of the Board

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m. Wednesday, December 13, 1995.

PLACE: Board Room, Second Floor, Federal Housing Finance Board, 1777 F 
Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006.

STATUS: Parts of this meeting will be open to the public. The rest of 
the meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED DURING PORTIONS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC:

    <bullet> Second Round 1995 AHP Applications Approval for the 
FHLBanks of Boston, New York, Cincinnati, Chicago, Des Moines, 
Dallas, Topeka, San Francisco and Seattle
    <bullet> Approval of AHP District Priorities
    <bullet> Approval of an AHP Award for First Union National Bank 
of Georgia
    <bullet> Review of Finance Board Policy for Directors Fees and 
Expenses
    <bullet> Appointment of FHLBank Public Interest Directors
    <bullet> Appointment of FHLBank Chairs
    <bullet> Repeal of Finance Board Regulation on Charitable 
Donations by the FHLBanks

MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED DURING PORTIONS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC:

    <bullet> FHLBank of San Francisco Affordable Housing Subsidies 
on Guaranteed Rate Advances

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Elaine L. Baker, Secretary to the 
Board, (202) 408-2837.
Rita I. Fair,

Managing Director.

[FR Doc. 95-30211 Filed 12-7-95; 12:41 pm]

BILLING CODE 6725-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 9, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 6860]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02453]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

[Docket No. 16-02]


D.F. Young, Inc. v. NYK Line (North America) Inc.; Notice of 
Filing of Complaint and Assignment

    Notice is given that a complaint has been filed with the Federal 
Maritime Commission (Commission) by D.F. Young, Inc., hereinafter 
``Complainant,'' against NYK Line (North America) Inc., hereinafter 
``Respondent.'' Complainant states that it is an ocean transportation 
intermediary licensed by the Commission and a Pennsylvania corporation. 
Complainant alleges that Respondent is a New York corporation and a 
common carrier of goods by water.
    Complainant alleges that Respondent has violated the Shipping Act, 
46 U.S.C. 41102, and the Commission's regulations at 46 CFR 515.42 ``by 
refusing to compensate Complainant for the freight forwarding services 
performed on Ford [Motor Company] shipments placed on vessels owned/and 
or operated by Respondent and/or its agents or affiliates, for which 
Respondent received freight charges, according to the terms of the 
Respondent's applicable tariffs . . . .''
    Complainant seeks an award of reparations in the amount of 
$252,776.89, plus interest and attorneys fees, ``a payment of 
additional amounts, not exceeding twice the amount of any award for 
injuries'' if violation of 46 U.S.C. 41103(3) be shown, and ``other 
such relief or award as the FMC shall determine.''
    The full text of the complaint can be found in the Commission's 
Electronic Reading Room at www.fmc.gov/16-02.
    This proceeding has been assigned to the Office of Administrative 
Law Judges. The initial decision of the presiding officer in this 
proceeding shall be issued by February 3, 2017, and the final decision 
of the Commission shall be issued by August 17, 2017.

Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-02453 Filed 2-8-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6731-AA-P
### Supreme Court ofthe United States Office ofthe Clerk 

### Washington, DC 20543-0001 Scott S. Harris Clerk of the Court 

## July 16, 2015 (202)479-3011
Clerk 

### Court of Criminal Appeals ofTexas P.O. Box 12308 Capitol Station Austin, TX 78711 Re: Chad William Murray v. Texas No. 15-67 (Your No. PD-1230-14)
Dear Clerk: 

### The petition for a writ ofcertiorari in the above entitled case was filed on July 14, 2015 and placed on the docket July 16, 2015 as No. 15-67.
Sincerely, Scott S. Harris, Clerk by Andrew Downs Case Analyst 

# E1VEDI ftAINALAPPEALS 

## (DOUBTOFCf 

## JUL 20 2015
Skip to main content

# Social Security

Search
Menu
Español
Sign in

## Benefits Paid by Type of Beneficiary

Office of the Chief Actuary 

Beneficiary Data

Growth in number of beneficiaries

Total benefit payment data

Other databases

      Monthly benefits are payable from the       Old-Age and Survivors Insurance      (OASI) and Disability Insurance (DI)      Trust Funds for certain types of beneficiaries.       The number of beneficiaries in current-payment status and their corresponding       average benefit amount are available through one of the two forms below.      Before continuing, you may want to see a brief       description of the available benefit types.

Note that the average benefit amounts provided by the forms below represent       the amounts due to beneficiaries in current payment status for the month(s)       included in the table.  These amounts exclude any adjustments to benefits for      retroactive payments and certain payment withholding that may be attributable      to eligibility in prior months. Therefore, these data do not represent total       benefits paid from the trust funds. Total benefit payment data including these      effects are available      here.

Data are available for 1967 and later.

**Report for a selected month**      You select a month, and we provide a report listing the       number of beneficiaries in current-payment status and their      corresponding average monthly benefit,       by type of beneficiary, as of the end of the month.

        Select month:         Jan  Feb         Mar  Apr         May  Jun              Jul  Aug         Sep  Oct         Nov  Dec                Enter year:                          (any year after 1966)                 Click on "Go" to submit your request
**Time series report**       You select a type, or types, of beneficiary, and we provide a time series        of the number of beneficiaries in current-payment status and their corresponding       average monthly benefit.              Selecting more than one type causes the data to be combined for        the selected types. If you make no selection, we will provide data       on all beneficiaries.

        Select beneficiary type(s):Retiredworkers &dependentsRetired workerSpouse of retired workerChild of retired workerSurvivorsChild of deceased workerAged widow(er)Young widow(er) with child in careDisabled widow(er)Parent of deceased workerDisabledworkers &dependentsDisabled workerSpouse of disabled workerChild of disabled workerSelect frequency:          Monthly        Quarterly        AnnualSelect range of years (optional): Last 2          Last 5                  Last 10                  All                 Click on "Go" to submit your requestFooter menu
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and GraphsUpdated May 3, 2006   |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|

| Retirement Age | Description of Proposed Provision:      Shorten the hiatus in the normal retirement age (speed up the increase to age 67).  That is, increase the NRA by 2 months per year for those attaining age 62 in 2012 through 2017, five years earlier than in current law, which would increase the NRA 2 months per year for those reaching age 62 in 2017 through 2022. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2005 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map |
1
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CSB Bancorp, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this annual report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Eddie L. SteinerEddie L. SteinerChief Executive Officer 
 28
#### John M. Helck, Administrator, etc., Appellant, v. Henry Reinheimer and others, Respondents.

As to the two defendants who defend, complaint dismissed, with costs to trial and judgment. As to the other defendants the usual decree of foreclosure, with costs as in case of default. No costs of appeal to any party. No decision as to the merits under the trust deed. Judgment to be settled by Learned, P. J.

Opinion by

Learned, P. J.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 27, 2024. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, June 27, 2024 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A24D0369. WILLIAM HAYWOOD GORDON v. HENRY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION . Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: SUCV2022002362