65288 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 243 / Tuesday, December 19, 1995 / Notices

comparison of Union’s U.S. sales of

‘‘half-mill’’ to DKI’s home-market sales.

Preliminary Results of Review

As a result of our comparison of USP

to FMV, we preliminarily determine

that the following margins exist for the

period August 18, 1993, through July 31,

1994:

CERTAIN COLD-ROLLED CARBON

STEEL FLAT PRODUCTS

Producer/manufacturer/exporter

Weightedaverage

margin (percent)

Dongbu ..................................... 6.07

Union ........................................ 1.21

Interested parties may request

disclosure within 5 days of the date of

publication of this notice and may

request a hearing within 10 days of

publication. Any hearing, if requested,

will be held 44 days after the date of

publication or the first business day

thereafter. Case briefs and/or written

comments from interested parties may

be submitted no later than 30 days after

the date of publication. Rebuttal briefs

and rebuttals to written comments,

limited to issues raised in those

comments, may be filed not later than

37 days after the date of publication of

this notice. The Department will

publish the final results of this

administrative review including the

results of its analysis of issues raised in

any such written comments or at a

hearing.

The Department shall determine, and

the Customs Service shall assess,

antidumping duties on all appropriate

entries. Individual differences between

the USP and FMV may vary from the

percentages stated above.

Furthermore, the following deposit

requirements will be effective for all

shipments of the subject merchandise

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,

for consumption on or after the

publication date of the final results of

this administrative review, as provided

for by section 751(a)(1) of the Act. A

cash deposit of estimated antidumping

duties shall be required on shipments of

certain cold-rolled carbon steel flat

products from Korea as follows: (1) The

cash deposit rates for the reviewed

company will be the rate established in

the final results of this review; (2) for

previously investigated companies not

listed above, the cash deposit rate will

continue to be the company-specific rate

published for the most recent period; (3)

if the exporter is not a firm covered in

this review or the original less-than-fairvalue (‘‘LTFV’’) investigation, but the

manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate

will be the rate established for the most

recent period for the manufacturer of

the merchandise; and (4) if neither the

exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm

covered in this review, the cash deposit

rate for this case will be 14.53 percent,

which is the ‘‘all others’’ rate for the

LTFV investigation. See Final

Determination of Sales at Less Than

Fair Value: Certain Cold-Rolled Carbon

Steel Flat Products from Korea, 58 FR

37176 (July 9, 1993).

This notice also serves as a

preliminary reminder to importers of

their responsibility under 19 CFR

§ 353.26 to file a certificate regarding the

reimbursement of antidumping duties

prior to liquidation of the relevant

entries during this review period.

Failure to comply with this requirement

could result in the Secretary’s

presumption that reimbursement of

antidumping duties occurred and the

subsequent assessment of double

antidumping duties.

This administrative review and this

notice are in accordance with section

751(a)(1) of the Act (19 U.S.C.

1675(a)(1)) and 19 CFR § 353.22.

Dated: December 8, 1995.

Susan G. Esserman,

Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 95–30799 Filed 12–18–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

Determination Not to Revoke

Antidumping Duty Orders and

Findings Nor to Terminate Suspended

Investigations

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Determination Not to Revoke

Antidumping Duty Orders and Findings

Nor to Terminate Suspended

Investigations.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce

is notifying the public of its

determination not to revoke the

antidumping duty orders and findings

nor to terminate the suspended

investigations listed below.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 19, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michael Panfeld or the analyst listed

under Antidumping Proceeding at:

Office of Antidumping Compliance,

Import Administration, International

Trade Administration, U.S. Department

of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution

Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230,

telephone (202) 482–4737.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

Department of Commerce (the

Department) may revoke an

antidumping duty order or finding or

terminate a suspended investigation,

pursuant to 19 CFR § 353.25(d)(4)(iii), if

no interested party has requested an

administrative review for four

consecutive annual anniversary months

and no domestic interested party objects

to the revocation or requests an

administrative review.

We had not received a request to

conduct an administrative review for

the most recent four consecutive annual

anniversary months. Therefore,

pursuant to § 353.25(d)(4)(i) of the

Department’s regulations, on November

1, 1995, we published in the Federal

Register a notice of intent to revoke

these antidumping duty orders and

findings and to terminate the suspended

investigations and served written notice

of the intent to each domestic interested

party on the Department’s service list in

each case. Within the specified time

frame, we received objections from

domestic interested parties to our intent

to revoke these antidumping duty orders

and findings and to terminate the

suspended investigations. Therefore,

because domestic interested parties

objected to our intent to revoke or

terminate, we no longer intend to revoke

these antidumping duty orders and

findings or to terminate the suspended

investigations.

Antidumping Proceeding

A–357–405

Argentina

Barbed Wire and Barbless Fencing

Wire

Objection Date: November 30, 1995;

November 20, 1995

Objector: Oklahoma Steel & Wire Co.;

Insteel Industries, Inc.; Keystone

Steel & Wire Company

Contact: Tom Killiam at (202) 482–

2704

A–357–007

Argentina

Carbon Steel Wire Rods

Objection Date: November 30, 1995

Objector: GS Industries, Inc.; GST

Steel Company; North Star Steel

Texas, Inc.; Co-Steel Raritan, Inc.;

Atlantic Steel Company

Contact: Tom Killiam at (202) 482–

2704

A–559–502

Singapore

Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and

Tube

Objection Date: November 20, 1995

Objector: Hannibal Industries, Inc.

Contact: Tom Killiam at (202) 482–

2704
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 243 / Tuesday, December 19, 1995 / Notices 65289

A–588–090

Japan

Certain Small Electric Motors of 5 to

150 Horsepower

Objection Date: November 24, 1995

Objector: Reliance Electric Industrial

Company

Contact: Nancy Decker at (202) 482–

5811

Dated: December 11, 1995.

Joseph A. Spetrini,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Compliance

[FR Doc. 95–30801 Filed 12–18–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

[C–351–818]

Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel

Plate From Brazil; Termination of

Countervailing Duty Administrative

Review

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of Termination of

Countervailing Duty Administrative

Review.

SUMMARY: On September 15, 1995 (60 R

47930), in response to a request from

Companhia Siderurgica de Tubarao

(CST), the Department of Commerce (the

Department) initiated an administrative

review of the countervailing duty order

on certain cut-to-length carbon steel

plate from Brazil for CST. In accordance

with 19 CFR 355.22(a)(3)(1994), the

Department is now terminating this

review because CST has withdrawn its

request for review.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 19, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Brian Albright or Kelly Parkhill, Office

of Countervailing Compliance, Import

Administration, International Trade

Administration, U.S. Department of

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution

Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C., 20230;

telephone: (202) 482–2786.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

On August 31, 1994, the Department

received a request for an administrative

review of this countervailing duty order

from CST, a Brazilian exporter of the

subject merchandise, for the period

January 1, 1994, through December 31,

1994. Although an importer of the

subject merchandise, Wirth Ltd.,

requested a review of the scope of this

order on the same date, no interested

party other than CST requested a review

of the countervailing duty rate. On

September 15, 1994, the Department

published in the Federal Register (60

FR 47930) a notice of ‘‘Initiation of

Countervailing Duty Administrative

Review’’ initiating the administrative

review of CST for that period. On

November 13, 1995, CST withdrew its

request for review .

Section 355.22(a)(3) of the

Department’s regulations stipulates that

the Secretary may permit a party that

requests a review to withdraw the

request not later than 90 days after the

date of publication of the notice of

initiation of the requested review. In

this case, CST has withdrawn its request

for review within the 90-day period.

Further, no other interested party

requested a review of the countervailing

duty rate in this case, and we have

received no submissions regarding

CST’s withdrawal of its request for

review. Therefore, we are terminating

the review of the countervailing duty

order on certain cut-to-length carbon

steel plate from Brazil for CST.

This notice is published in

accordance with 19 CFR 355.22(a)(3).

Dated: December 11, 1995.

Joseph A. Spetrini,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Compliance.

[FR Doc. 95–30800 Filed 12–18–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

[C–333–002]

Cotton Yarn From Peru; Termination of

Countervailing Duty Administrative

Review

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of termination of

countervailing duty administrative

review.

SUMMARY: On June 25, 1993, (58 FR

34414) the Department of Commerce

(the Department) initiated an

administrative review of the

countervailing duty order on cotton

yarn from Peru for the period January 1,

1992 through December 31, 1992. The

Department has now decided to

terminate this review.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 19, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Gayle Longest or Kelly Parkhill, Office

of Countervailing Compliance, Import

Administration, International Trade

Administration, U.S. Department of

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution

Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230;

telephone: (202) 482–2786.

Background

On February 25, 1993, the Department

received a request for an administrative

review of this countervailing duty order

from the American Yarn Spinners

Association (AYSA) for the period

January 1, 1992 to December 31, 1992.

No other interested party requested an

administrative review. On June 25, 1993

the Department published, in the

Federal Register (58 FR 34414), a notice

of ‘‘Initiation of Countervailing Duty

Administrative Review.’’ On December

1, 1995, AYSA withdrew its request for

review.

Section 355.22(a)(3) of the

Department’s regulations stipulates that

the Secretary may permit a party that

requests a review to withdraw the

request not later than 90 days after the

date of publication of the notice of

initiation of the requested review. This

regulation also provides that the

Secretary may extend the time limit for

withdrawal of a request if it is

reasonable to do so.

Because no significant work has been

completed on this review, the

aforementioned request for withdrawal

does not unduly burden the

Department. Therefore, under the

circumstances presented in this review,

we are waiving the 90-day requirement

in section 355.22(a)(3). Accordingly, we

are terminating this review.

This notice is published in

accordance with section 355.22(a)(3) of

the Department’s regulations.

Dated: December 11, 1995.

Joseph A. Spetrini,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Compliance.

[FR Doc. 95–30802 Filed 12–18–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

National Oceanic and Atmospheric

Administration

Olympic Coast National Marine

Sanctuary Advisory Council; Meeting

AGENCY: Sanctuaries and Reserves

Division (SRD), Office of Ocean and

Coastal Resource Management (OCRM),

National Ocean Service (NOS), National

Oceanic and Atmospheric

Administration (NOAA), Department of

Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; Meeting of the Olympic

Coast National Marine Sanctuary

Advisory Council.

SUMMARY: The Advisory Council was

established in December 1995 to advise

NOAA’s Sanctuaries and Reserves

Division regarding the management of

the Olympic Coast National Marine

Sanctuary. The Advisory Council was

convened under the National Marine

Sanctuaries Act.

TIME AND PLACE: Thursday, January 18,

1996, from 9 a.m. until 5 p.m. The

meeting will be held at the Clallam