alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### ALICE McGINNIS v. GERALD THOMAS SMITH and THOMAS ENNIS SMITH.

(Filed 28 September, 1960.)

1. Automobiles § 41 d—

In plaintiff’s action to recover for a collision resulting when the vehicle driven by defendant ran into the rear of plaintiff’s ear, an admission by defendant of his violation of G.S. 20-152(a) requires the submission of the issue of negligence to the jury.

2. Automobiles § 42c—

Plaintiff's evidence to the effect that he stopped suddenly to avoid colliding with a vehicle which had stopped ahead' of him, when he was struck from the rear by the car driven by defendant, *is held*not to disclose contributory negligence as a matter of law.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Phillips, J.,*August 8, 1960 Civil Term, of Gaston.

Plaintiff seeks compensation for personal injuries and property dam*71ages alleged to have resulted from a collision between her automobile, driven for her by her husband, and an automobile owned by Thomas Ennis Smith and driven by Gerald Thomas Smith as agent for the owner. Both vehicles were traveling northwardly on Main Street in Stanley. The collision occurred about 6:15 p.m. on 3 November 1959. The Smith car ran into the rear of plaintiff’s car when it stopped to avoid colliding with a vehicle which had stopped ahead of it. Plaintiff alleged negligence on the part of defendants in failing to maintain a proper lookout, failing to keep their vehicle under control, and in following too closely in violation of G.S. 20-152. Following the collision, defendant driver entered a plea of guilty to a charge of violating this statute.

Defendants pleaded violations of the provisions of G.S. 20-154 by the operator of plaintiff’s vehicle to defeat plaintiff’s recovery. Following the collision, the signal lights on plaintiff’s vehicle were found to be in operating condition.

At the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence the court allowed defendant’s motion to nonsuit and plaintiff appealed.

*Dolley & DuBose for plaintiff, appellant.*

*Whitener & Mitchem for defendant appellees.*

PER CuRiam.

The admission by defendant driver of a violation of G.S. 20-152 (a) is sufficient to require jury determination of the question of actionable negligence. The evidence with respect to contributory negligence is sufficient to permit but not compel an affirmative answer to that issue raised by the pleadings.

Reversed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

AAREN W

. STRIPLIN , Plaintiff,

v. Civil Action No. 24

- 1651 (JEB)

KAMALA D. HARRIS , et al. ,

Defendant s .

MEMORANDUM OPINION

P ro se Plaintiff Aaren W

. Striplin filed a Complaint that named dozens of Defendant s as
“serial killers,” ranging from Vice President Kamala Harris and the Metropolitan Police

Department to Chuck Norris and Barron Trump

. See ECF No. 2 (Compl.) at 2, 4, 7

– 8

. As best
the Court can discern, Plaintiff alleges that he is the victim of “identity theft,” and that

Defendant s are “resisting [his] arrest to steal [his] church, school, bank, hospital, store .” Id. at 1

.
Plaintiff also accuses Defendants of violating th e “ Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organized

Crime Act
, ” committing a Ponzi Scheme, pyramid scheme, 23 homicides, and 169 c ounts of

court extortion
, amidst a torrent of other indecipherable allegations

. Id. at 4. He supports these

assertions with unelaborated references to “ You T ube .com

. ” Id. at 7.
“Over the years this Court has repeatedly held that the federal courts are without power to
entertain claims otherwise within their jurisdiction if they are so attenuate d and unsubstantial as
to be absolutely devoid of merit , wholly insubstantial, obviously frivolous, plainly unsubstantial,
or no longer open to discussion .” Hagans v. Lavine , 415 U.S. 528, 536

- 37 (1974) ( cleaned up );

see also Best v. Kelly , 39 F.3d 328, 3 30

- 31 (D.C. Cir. 1994) (may dismiss claims that are
“essentially fictitious”

– for example, where they suggest “bizarre conspiracy theories . . . [or]2 fantastic government manipulations of their will or mind”) ( cleaned up ). This is precisely what

the Comp laint alleges here.
The Court is mindful that complaints filed by pro se litigants are held to “ less stringent

standards ” than those applied to “ formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. ” Haines v. Kerner , 404
U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Having reviewed Plainti ff’s Complaint, the Court concludes that the
factual contentions that are identifiable are baseless and wholly incredible. For this reason, the

Complaint is frivolous and must be dismissed.
The Court, accordingly, will issue a contemporaneous Order dismissing the case without
prejudice.

/s/ **James E. Boasberg** JAMES E. BOASBERG Chief Judge Date: June 20, 2024
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members         
    -  AEE Multimedia         
    -  AEE Research Library 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# PHOTOS ANDVIDEOS

Search

Search

                                - All Images 
                                - Other 
                                - Space Shuttle 

                                - Upload Date
                                - Photo Date
                                - Title

----

Download Image: Full Size (5.77 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
EXHIBIT 32.1

STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF PREMIERE GLOBAL SERVICES, INC.
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Premiere Global Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Boland T. Jones, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| | /s/ Boland T. Jones                                                                   
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                                       
| | Boland T. Jones
Chief Executive Officer
Premiere Global Services, Inc.
October 8, 2008

---
EXHIBIT
32.1
  **PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION**
  In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K , as amended by Amendment No. 1
thereto on Form 10K/A (the “Report”), of Data Systems & Software Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the undersigned, George Morgenstern,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:


1.
    the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
  Dated: May 2, 2005By:
    /s/ George
    MorgensternGeorge Morgenstern, Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive
      Officer)
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
SLM International, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 33-53996) of our report, which
included an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company's accounting for the
Plan of Reorganization, dated April 14, 1997, on our audits of the consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedule of SLM International, Inc.
as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and for the years ended December 31, 1996,
1995 and 1994, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

Albany, New York
April 14, 1997
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and GraphsUpdated May 3, 2006   |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|

| Level of Monthly Benefits (PIA) | Description of Proposed Provision:      For each year from 2006-2036, multiply the 32 and 15 percent formula factors by 0.987, reducing the factors to 21 percent and 10 percent respectively, for new eligibles in 2036 and later |
|---------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2005 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map |
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 27 (Thursday, February 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7798]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3229]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Materials Research; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463 as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Materials Research (DMR).
    Date and Time: February 28, 1995, 8:30 am to 5:00 pm.
    Place: National Science Foundation Conference Room 1060, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Amar Bhalla, Program Director, Ceramics, 
Division of Materials Research, Room 1065, National Science 
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone 
(703) 306-1836.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning support for NSF Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) 
Program.
    Agenda: Evaluation of proposals.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information, financial data such as salaries, and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552 b. (c) (4) and (6) of 
the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: February 6, 1995.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-3229 Filed 2-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
#### MRS. MARY SPENCER v. W. T. HASSELL.

(Filed 30 November, 1932.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *MacRae, Special Judge,*at May Special Term, 1932, of Meokxenbubg.

No error.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff, as tbe result of a rear-end collision between an automobile driven by tbe defendant, and tbe automobile in which plaintiff was riding with her husband.

Tbe jury found that plaintiff was not injured by tbe negligence of tbe defendant as alleged in tbe complaint.

From judgment that plaintiff take nothing by her action, and taxing her with tbe costs, tbe plaintiff appealed to tbe Supreme Court.

*Cochran & McClenaghan and J. Laurence J ones for plaintiff.*

*Ralph V. Kidd for defendant.*

Per, Curiam.

There was evidence at the trial of this action tending to show, as contended by the plaintiff, that the collision which resulted in injuries to the plaintiff, was caused by the negligence of the defendant. There was evidence, on the other band, tending to show, as contended by the defendant, that the collision was caused by the negligence of plaintiff’s husband, who was driving the automobile in which she was riding. All the evidence was submitted to the jury under instructions which are free from reversible error. The instructions with respect to the proximate cause of plaintiff’s injuries were in substantial accord with the law as applied in numerous, cases decided by this Court. The plaintiff is not entitled to a new trial, as a matter of law. The judgment is affirmed.

No error.
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 75th 

Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

-2.00% -4.34% 0.12% 0.10% -1.89% -4.24%

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable)

Proposed Provision: Apply 2 percent payroll tax rate on earnings over $400,000 in 2017, with the 

$400,000 threshold wage-indexed after 2017. Give proportional benefit credit for additional earnings in 

AIME for benefit computation.

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this provision

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Cost rates with this provision

Income rates under present law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under present law

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Present law With this provision

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2009 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary, Social Security

May 14, 2010

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Cost rates with this provision

Income rates under present law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under present law

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Present law With this provision
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

REAL TIME RESOLUTIONS, INC.

, Appellant,

v.

NORMAN G. BERUBE a/k/a NORMAN BERUBE, et al.

, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 22

- 357

[ July 1 4 , 2022 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Andrea Gundersen , Judge; L.T. Case No.

CACE19001138

.

Loretta Comiskey O'Keeffe and Patti W. Halloran of Gibbons | Neuman,

Tampa, for appellant.

Michael Farrar, Doral, for appellee Asset Recovery Inc.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER

, L EVINE and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Of

Chief Executive Officer And

Chief Financial Officer

Of NATCO
Group Inc.

Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, John U. Clarke, Chief Executive Officer of NATCO Group Inc. (the
Company), and, I, Bradley P. Farnsworth, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |                                              
|------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------
|Date: May 10, 2007 |  | /s/    JOHN U.
CLARKE                        
|                   |  | John U. Clarke Chief Executive Officer       
|                   | 
|Date: May 10, 2007 |  | /s/    BRADLEY P.
FARNSWORTH                 
|                   |  | Bradley P. Farnsworth Chief Financial Officer
**Laura A.** **Cavaretta BOARD** **(TJtTTHEn. CIVIl** **APPK1UTE LMV** **THUS boabd** **or IBGU** **SPECLUEEARON Cavahetta.** **Katona Kr\ncis,** **PLLC CAVARETrAL@CKFlAW.COM** **T: 210-588-2901** **F: 210-588-2908** **April 21,** **2015 Ms.** **Jennifer Saenz,** **Deputy Clerk** **Court of** **Appeals Fourth** **Court of Appeals** **District Cadena-R.eeves** **Justice Center** **300 Dolorosa,** **Suite 3200** **San Antonio,** **Texas 78205-3037** **RE: "T3** **ro no** **-• CD** **no in** **;-c:-ri .-■** **'"1**

### Court**of Appeals** **No. 04-15-00185-CV;** **Trial Court** **Case Number:** **385685; Bexar** **County Hospital** **District d/b/a University** **Health System** **Theresa L.** **Espinoza; Fourth** **Court of** **Appeals; Our** **File No.** **3815-251**

### Court**of Appeals** **No. 04-I5-00155-CV;** **Trial Court** **Case Number:** **2014-CI-l 1941;** **Bexar County** **Hospital District** **dba University** **Health System** **v. Paul** **Douglas Harlan;** **Fourth Court of** **Appeals; Our** **File No.** **3815-302 Dear** **Ms. Saenz:** 

### Please**be advised** **that will** **be on** **vacation and** **unavailable for** **hearings or** **depositions from June** **15, 2015;** **September 23** **28, 2015** **and October** **18, 2015.** **By copy** **of this** **correspondence, am** **notifying all** **counsel of** **record of** **my scheduled** **vacation and** **requesting that** **they refrain** **from scheduling** **any hearings,** **depositions, etc.** **during this** **time. 'ITiank** **you for** **your attention** **to this** **matter. Sincerely,** **Laura A.** **Cavaretta LAC/mrd** **Richard Sarabia** **(\'ia Facsimile** **Transmission 785-2498)** **Paul Saputo,** **Jr. (Via** **Facsimile Transmission** **(888) 236-2516)** **1143994 One** **Riverwalk Place** **700 N.** **St. Mary's** **St., Ste.** **1500 San** **Antonio, Texas** **78205**
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual Balance 

in 75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

B

7

-1.70% -4.20% 0.36% 0.50% -1.34% 

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2008 Trustees Report Office of the Chief A

July 16, 2008

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Level of Monthly Benefits (PIA)

Proposed Provision: Reduce benefits by 3 percent for those newly eligible for benefits in 20

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this 

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

0.02.04.06.08.0

10.012.014.016.018.020.0

2008 2018 2028 2038 2048 2058 2068 2078

Year

Percent

Cost rates with this provisionCost rates under present lawIncome rates with this provisionIncome rates under present law

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

 (assets as a percentage of annual expe

0

100200300400500600700800900

1000

2008 2018 2028 2038 2048 2058 

Year

Percent

Present law With this p
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains notices of meetings published under

the ‘‘Government in the Sunshine Act’’ (Pub.

L. 94-409) 5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3).

Sunshine Act Meetings Federal Register

67393

Vol. 60, No. 250

Friday, December 29, 1995

UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE

HEALTH SCIENCES

TIME AND DATE: 9:00 a.m., February 5,

1996.

PLACE: Naval Medical Center, San

Diego, California.

STATUS: Open—under ‘‘Government in

the Sunshine Act’’ (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)).

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

9:00 a.m. Meeting—Board of Regents

(1) Approval of Minutes—November 6, 1995

(2) Faculty Matters

(3) Departmental Reports

(4) Financial Report

(5) Report—President, USUHS

(6) Report—Dean, School of Medicine

(7) Comments—Chairman, Board of Regents

(8) New Business

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Bobby D. Anderson, Executive Secretary

of the Board of Regents, 301/295–3116.

Dated: Decemeber 27, 1995.

Linda Bynum,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer,

Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 95–31552 Filed 12–27–95; 11:26

am]

BILLING CODE 5000–04–M
In re Comfort

Roberts Appellant/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 24, 2014

No. 04-14-00055-CV

IN RE Comfort ROBERTS

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

On February 3, 2014, relator filed a motion for rehearing. The panel has considered the

motion and it is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED on February 24th, 2014. PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2013CI12260, styled Lloyd Douglas Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a River City

Care Center and Steve Robinson v. Comfort Roberts, Joe A. Fuentes, Cynthia Huggins and Ida Jackson

, pending in

the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Janet Littlejohn presiding.