alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3738 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to reissue final rules relating to 

listing the gray wolf in the Western Great Lakes and Wyoming under 

the Endangered Species Act of 1973. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 2, 2022 

Mr. JOHNSON (for himself, Mr. BARRASSO, and Ms. LUMMIS) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to reissue final rules 

relating to listing the gray wolf in the Western Great 

Lakes and Wyoming under the Endangered Species Act 

of 1973. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REISSUANCE OF FINAL RULE REGARDING 

4 GRAY WOLVES IN WESTERN GREAT LAKES. 

5 Before the end of the 60-day period beginning on the 

6 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior 

7 shall reissue the final rule published on December 28, 

8 2011 (76 Fed. Reg. 81666), without regard to any other 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3738 IS

1 provision of statute or regulation that applies to issuance 

2 of such rule. Such reissuance shall not be subject to judi3 cial review. 

4 SEC. 2. REISSUANCE OF FINAL RULE REGARDING GRAY 

5 WOLVES IN WYOMING. 

6 The final rule published on September 10, 2012 (77 

7 Fed. Reg. 55530), that was reinstated on March 3, 2017, 

8 by the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Dis9 trict of Columbia (No. 14–5300) and further republished 

10 on May 1, 2017 (82 Fed. Reg. 20284–85), that reinstates 

11 the removal of Federal protections for the gray wolf in 

12 Wyoming under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as 

13 amended, shall not be subject to judicial review. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             343
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,888
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,833
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,858
<PP&E>                                          12,121
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 294,482
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           55,892
<BONDS>                                        173,668
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,945
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,481
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   294,482
<SALES>                                         63,014
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               176,499
<CGS>                                           41,398
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  111,329
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                80,804
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,496
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (28,869)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (8,055)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,814)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,814)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 2, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 57]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31550]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Meeting of the Historical Records Declassification Advisory 
Panel, Department of Defense Historical Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the forthcoming meeting of the 
Historical Records Declassification Advisory Panel. The purpose of this 
meeting is to discuss recommendations to the Department of Defense on 
topical areas of interest that, from a historical perspective, would be 
of the greatest benefit if declassified. Four publish sessions will be 
held in 1996. The OSD Historian will chair these meetings.

DATE: February 23, 1996.

ADDRESSES: The National Archives Building, The Archivist Reception Room 
105, 7th and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20408.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William Bell, Room 3C281, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of 
Defense (Intelligence and Security), Office of the Assistant Secretary 
of Defense for Command, Control, Communications, and Intelligence, 6000 
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-6000, telephone (703) 695-2289/
2686.

    Dated: December 27, 1995.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 95-31550 Filed 12-29-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 0.20 0.31 6% 7%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

September 15, 2023

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Level of Monthly Benefits

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: B3.12. Use an annualized "mini-PIA" formula beginning with retired workers newly 

eligible in 2030. For each indexed earnings year, compute an individual AIME and an individual PIA. Sum 

these individual PIAs for the 40 highest years of indexed earnings and divide that total amount by 37 to get 

the PIA for this provision. Phase-in over five years, meaning that in 2030, 80 percent of the benefit would 

be based on the old 35-year average PIA formula and 20 percent on the new mini-PIA formula, shifting by 

20 percentage points each year until 100 percent is based on the new mini-PIA formula for those attaining 

age 62 in 2034. Disabled worker benefits are unchanged under this provision.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7206

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus EMJADIA PORTER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CR-94-37; CA-97-690-7) Submitted: May 28, 2004 Decided: June 29, 2004 Before WILKINSON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Emjadia Porter, Appellant Pro Se. Karen Breeding Peters, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Emjadia Porter seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion seeking reconsideration of the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part Porter’s motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Porter has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Porter’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 365 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 365

   To amend title 18, United States Code, to require a provider of a 
  report to the CyberTipline related to online sexual exploitation of 
children to preserve the contents of such report for 180 days, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 23, 2021

  Mrs. Blackburn (for herself, Ms. Cortez Masto, Ms. Hassan, and Mr. 
    Hawley) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 18, United States Code, to require a provider of a 
  report to the CyberTipline related to online sexual exploitation of 
children to preserve the contents of such report for 180 days, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Eliminate Network Distribution of 
Child Exploitation Act'' or the ``END Child Exploitation Act''.

SEC. 2. PRESERVATION OF REPORTS TO CYBERTIPLINE RELATED TO ONLINE 
              SEXUAL EXPLOITATION OF CHILDREN.

    Section 2258A(h) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``90 days'' and inserting 
        ``180 days''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(5) Extension of preservation.--A provider of a report to 
        the CyberTipline may voluntarily preserve the contents provided 
        in the report (including any comingled content described in 
        paragraph (2)) for longer than 180 days after the submission to 
        the CyberTipline for the purpose of reducing the proliferation 
        of online child sexual exploitation or preventing the online 
        sexual exploitation of children.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 242 (Monday, December 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65090-65091]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30642]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

Poverty Threshold

AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is hereby giving 
notice of the weighted average poverty threshold in 1994 for one person 
(unrelated individual) as established by the Bureau of the Census.

DATES: The 1994 poverty threshold is for consideration effective 
October 5, 1995, 

[[Page 65091]]
the date on which it was established by the Bureau of the Census.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Paul Trowbridge, Consultant, Regulations Staff, Compensation and 
Pension Service, Veterans Benefits Administration, Department of 
Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 
273-7210.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: VA published a final regulation amendment 38 
CFR 4.16(a) in the Federal Register on August 3, 1990, pages 31579-80. 
The amendment provided that marginal employment generally shall be 
deemed to exist when a veteran's earned annual income does not exceed 
the amount established by the Bureau of the Census as the poverty 
threshold for one person. VA noted that the weighted average poverty 
threshold in 1988 for one person (unrelated individual) as established 
by the Bureau of Census was $6.024 and stated we would publish 
subsequent poverty threshold figures as notices in Federal Register.
    The Bureau of the Census recently published the weighted average 
poverty thresholds for 1994. The threshold for one person (unrelated 
individual) is $7,547.

    Dated: December 8, 1995.
Jesse Brown,
Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
[FR Doc. 95-30642 Filed 12-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable) | Description of Proposed Provision:      Apply 2 percent payroll tax rate on earnings over $300,000 in 2017, with the $300,000 threshold wage-indexed after 2017.  Give proportional benefit credit for additional earnings in AIME for benefit computation. |
|-------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                           |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2009 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified May 14, 2010 |
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 8660]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3746]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Matenve, Ltd.; Formation of, Acquisition by, or Merger of Bank 
Holding Companies

    The company listed in this notice has applied for the Board's 
approval under section 3 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 
1842) and Sec.  225.14 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.14) to 
become a bank holding company or to acquire a bank or bank holding 
company. The factors that are considered in acting on the applications 
are set forth in section 3(c) of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    The application is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that application or to the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Any comment on an application that 
requests a hearing must include a statement of why a written 
presentation would not suffice in lieu of a hearing, identifying 
specifically any questions of fact that are in dispute and summarizing 
the evidence that would be presented at a hearing.
    Comments regarding this application must be received not later than 
March 10, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Zane R. Kelley, Vice President) 
104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303:
    1. Matenve, Ltd., Miami, Florida; to become a bank holding company 
by acquiring 25.97 percent of the voting shares of Ocean Bankshares, 
Inc., Miami, Florida, and thereby indirectly acquire Ocean Bank, Miami, 
Florida.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 9, 
1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-3746 Filed 2-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Retirement Age | Description of Proposed Provision:      Gradually raise the earliest eligibility age (EEA) for Social Security retirement benefits from 62 to 65.  The EEA would be increased by 2 months for individuals reaching age 62 in every year, starting in 2010.  The EEA of 65 would apply for those reaching age 62 in 2027 and later (those reaching age 65 in 2030 and later).  As under current law, the PIA formula applicable for any individual would depend on the year in which eligibility age is attained.  It should be noted that the elimination of retirement eligibility between ages 62 and 65 would increase the number of individuals who would apply for disabled worker benefits at those ages. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2008 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified July 16, 2008 |
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 0.10 0.27 3% 6%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

September 15, 2023

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Level of Monthly Benefits

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: B3.9. Beginning with those newly eligible for OASDI benefits in 2036, gradually 

reduce the 15 percent PIA factor in each year so that it reaches 10 percent for those newly eligible in 2065 

and later.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion s h ould not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. 

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________ No. 96-11169 Summary Calendar

_______________________
RICHARD WARE, III, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus DALLAS COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

(3:95-CV-2417-P)

_________________________________________________________________ July 9, 1997 Before JONES, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *



### The court has considered appellant’s position in light of the briefs and pertinent portions of the record. Having done so, we find no reversible error of fact or law and affirm for essentially the reasons stated by the district court.

### AFFIRMED .
## Detailed Single Year Tables

- Individual Provisions
- Level of Monthly Benefits

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						B4.4: Reduce the number of computation years (increase dropout years) for parents having a child in care under the age of 6. The parent must have no earnings (covered or non-covered) for the year to be eligible for the credit. Only one parent can claim the childcare added dropout year for a given earnings year. Each parent can earn at most 2 dropout years per child, and a maximum of 5 dropout years in total. The years designated as childcare years do not have to be the years that could otherwise be included in the computation of the average indexed monthly earnings (AIME). The provision would be effective for all benefits payable for entitlement in January 2025 and later (without regard for when the beneficiary became initially eligible).**

### Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program

### Summarized Estimates
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3773 

AN ACT 

To authorize leases of up to 99 years for land held in 

trust for the Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 3773 ES

1 SECTION 1. CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE CHEHALIS 

2 RESERVATION LEASING AUTHORITY. 

3 Subsection (a) of the first section of the Act of Au4 gust 9, 1955 (69 Stat. 539, chapter 615; 25 U.S.C. 

5 415(a)), is amended, in the second sentence, by inserting 

6 ‘‘, land held in trust for the Confederated Tribes of the 

7 Chehalis Reservation’’ after ‘‘Crow Tribe of Montana’’. 

Passed the Senate December 20, 2022. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3773 

AN ACT 

To authorize leases of up to 99 years for land held 

halis Reservation. in trust for the Confederated Tribes of the Che-