alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
 31



CERTIFICATION
 OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I,Nelson
 Skalbania, certify that:   1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q
 (Report) ofSolar Energy Limited;

2.
 Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
 necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
 respect to the period covered by this Report;    3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
 information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
 flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the period presented in this Report;    4. I am responsible for
 establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules
 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:   a) Designed
 such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to
 ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer is made known to me by others within those entities,
 particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;    b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small
 business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the
 disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and   c)
 Disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred
 during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the
 case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers
 internal control over financial reporting; and



5. I
 have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small
 business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):    a) All significant deficiencies
 and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
 adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and    b)
 Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business
 issuer's internal controls over financial reporting.



Date:May
 20, 2008





/s/
 Nelson Skalbania

Nelson
 Skalbania, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
 Officer

24
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and GraphsUpdated May 3, 2006   |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|

| Level of OASDI Contribution and Benefit Base | Description of Proposed Provision:      Make 90 percent of the earnings subject to the payroll tax (phased in 2008-2017), but retain the current-law taxable maximum for benefit purposes.  This estimate considers all self-employed earnings in computing the percentage of earnings subject to the payroll tax. |
|----------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                              |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2005 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map |
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 8, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 7625]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3296]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Federal Maritime Commission

TIME AND DATE 2 p.m.--February 9, 1995.

PLACE: Room 100 (Hearing Room)--800 North Capital St., NW., Washington, 
DC 20573-001.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTER(S) TO BE CONSIDERED:


1. Trans-Atlantic Conference Agreement Proceedings (Fact Finding 
Investigation No. 21, Dockets No. 94-28, 94-29 and 94-30)--
Consideration of Proposed Settlement.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Joseph C. Polking, Secretary, 
(202) 523-5725.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-3296 Filed 2-6-95; 3:09 pm]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
Exhibit 99.2

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

The undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity
as an officer of Allegiance Telecom, Inc. (the "Company"), that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

|Dated: May 20, 2003 |  | By: |  | /s/THOMAS M. LORDName: Thomas M. Lord
Title:Executive Vice President of Corporate Development and Chief Financial Officer
|------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Allegiance Telecom, Inc. and will be retained by Allegiance Telecom, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001058952
<NAME> YOUNG AMERICA HOLDINGS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          10,376
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,981
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        959
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,633
<PP&E>                                          22,557
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,160
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,686
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,538
<BONDS>                                         80,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,871
<OTHER-SE>                                    (65,575)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,686
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,035
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,011
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,472
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    731
<INCOME-TAX>                                       271
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                460
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       460
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
## Detailed Single Year Tables

- Individual Provisions
- Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable)

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						E3.18: Increase the taxable maximum linearly over 4 years to $279,900 for 2028. After 2028, index the taxable maximum to AWI plus 0.5 percentage point. Apply benefit credit on additional earnings taxed.**

### Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program

### Summarized Estimates
Skip to main content

# Social Security

Search
Menu
Español
Sign in

## 2016 OASDI Trustees Report

Office of the Chief Actuary
Actuarial Publications
2016 Trustees Report
ContentsTablesFigures

LIST OF FIGURES

II.D1	Short-Range OASI and DI Combined Trust Fund Ratio

II.D2	OASDI Income, Cost, and Expenditures as Percentages of Taxable Payroll

II.D3	DI Income, Cost, and Expenditures as Percentages of Taxable Payroll

II.D4	Number of Covered Workers Per OASDI Beneficiary

II.D5	OASDI Cost and Non-interest Income as a Percentage of GDP

II.D6	Cumulative Scheduled OASDI Income Less Cost, From Program Inception Through Years 2015-2090

II.D7	Long-Range OASI and DI Combined Trust Fund Ratios Under Alternative Scenarios

II.D8	Long-Range OASI and DI Combined Trust Fund Ratios From Stochastic Modeling

II.D9	OASDI Annual Balances: 2015 and 2016 Trustees Reports

IV.A1	Short-Range OASI and DI Trust Fund Ratios

IV.B1	Long-Range OASI and DI Annual Income Rates and Cost Rates

IV.B2	Number of OASDI Beneficiaries Per 100 Covered Workers

IV.B3	Long-Range OASI and DI Trust Fund Ratios

IV.B4	OASDI Annual Balances: 2015 and 2016 Trustees Reports

V.C1	Primary-Insurance-Amount Formula for Those Newly Eligible in 2016

V.C2	OASI Maximum-Family-Benefit Formula for Those Newly Eligible in 2016

V.C3	DI Disability Incidence Rates, 1970-2090

V.C4	DI Disability Termination Rates, 1970-2090

V.C5	Comparison of DI Disability Incidence Rates, Termination Rates and Conversion Ratios Under Intermediate Assumptions, 1970-2090

V.C6	DI Disability Prevalence Rates, 1970-2090

VI.E1	Long-Range OASDI Cost Rates From Stochastic Modeling

VI.E2	Long-Range OASDI Trust Fund Ratios From Stochastic Modeling

VI.E3	OASDI Cost Rates: Comparison of Stochastic to Low-Cost, Intermediate, and High-Cost Alternatives

VI.E4	OASDI Trust Fund (Unfunded Obligation) Ratios: Comparison of Stochastic to Low-Cost, Intermediate, and High-Cost Alternatives

VI.G1	Estimated OASDI Income and Cost in CPI-indexed 2016 Dollars, Based on Intermediate Assumptions

Footer menu
#### C. D. BUCHANAN v. B. & D. COACH LINE, Inc., et al.

(Filed 7 December, 1927.)

Appeal by defendant, B. *&*D. Coach Line, Inc., from *Parher, J.,*at June Term, 1927, of McDowell.

Motion to set aside judgment rendered on a verdict awarding the plaintiff $500 as damages in a suit for personal injuries, at the Spring-Term, 1927, McDowell Superior Court. Motion denied, and defendant appeals.

*813*Morgan & Ragland for plaintiff.*

*Walter G. Feimster and Hester & Rooker for defendant, B. & D. Goach Line, Inc.*

Pee Oueiam.

Tbis is an appeal by tbe defendant, B. & D. Coach Line, Inc., from a refusal to set aside a judgment awarding plaintiff damages for personal injuries sustained while a passenger in one of the defendant’s busses, on 8 November, 1926. The judge found that the defendant had a meritorious defense, hut that it had shown no “mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect” in allowing judgment to be taken in the action. C. S., 600.

Upon the facts found by the trial court and embodied in the judgment, we see no valid reason for disturbing his ruling on the motion. *Cahoon v. Brinkley,*176 N. C., 5, 96 S. E., 650. It would serve no useful purpose to set out the judgment in full.

Affirmed.
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual Balance 

in 75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

-2.00% -4.34% 0.61% 0.84% -1.39% -3.50%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2009 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary, Social Security

August 26, 2009

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Level of Monthly Benefits (PIA)

Proposed Provision: Reduce benefits by 5 percent for those newly eligible for benefits in 2010 and later.

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this provision

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Year

Percent

Cost rates with this provision

Cost rates under present law

Income rates with this provision

Income rates under present law

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

 (assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Year

Percent

Present law With this provision
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

M. Ryan Pinkston (SBN 310971) 

rpinkston@seyfarth.com 

560 Mission Street, Suite 3100 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 397-2823 

Facsimile: (415) 397-8549 

Attorneys for 

Turner Construction Company

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION, 

- and - 

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, 

Debtors. 

☐ Affects PG&E Corporation 

☒ Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company

☐ Affects both Debtors 

*All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case, 

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Bankruptcy Case

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Chapter 11 

(Lead Case) 

(Jointly Administered) 

TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY’S 

NOTICE OF PERFECTION OF LIEN 

PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. § 546(b)

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4911 Filed: 12/01/19 Entered: 12/01/19 12:42:09 Page 1 of

5
1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 362(b)(3) and 546(b), Turner Construction Company (“Turner”) hereby 

gives notice of its perfection of, maintenance and continuation of perfection of, and intention to enforce 

to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, see, e.g., California Civil Code § 8400 et seq., Turner’s 

duly recorded mechanic’s lien for labor, equipment, material, and services provided by Turner to Pacific 

Gas and Electric Company, as more fully described in the attached Exhibit A. See Village Nurseries v. 

Gould (In re Baldwin Builders), 232 B.R. 406 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 1999); Village Nurseries v. Greenbaum, 

101 Cal. App. 4th 26 (2002). This notice is in addition to, and not in lieu of, Turner’s right and intention 

to enforce its lien to the fullest extent permitted by law. Turner reserves all rights. 

DATED: December 1, 2019 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

By: /s/ M. Ryan Pinkston 

M. Ryan Pinkston 

Attorneys for Turner Construction Company

56430669v.1 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4911 Filed: 12/01/19 Entered: 12/01/19 12:42:09 Page 2 of

5
EXHIBIT A 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4911 Filed: 12/01/19 Entered: 12/01/19 12:42:09 Page 3 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4911 Filed: 12/01/19 Entered: 12/01/19 12:42:09 Page 4 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4911 Filed: 12/01/19 Entered: 12/01/19 12:42:09 Page 5 of

5
OFFICE OF THE ATI’ORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Q-GhUNN 

489 

~reblo Dosal Allest pus 3 

for hlo ~oputf40, ~pr4duo 40 flu buglary aloft, 

robbory inooranu mo6ootlng pubdo tar, &tmllo s l x p eo 4 eo s4 o tm! no ur o uy .xp4o Mp .m- ~ 

+u4 4 t# h o t l a a lt16a ut& e 4mm0 so ma ho-la, 

WI* o mo t~ t?4 uur u, 4 4 a o 6ay o uto rl o, ea tt r o a d 

44oo l4 01 4uman, n 

P 

M hul r u#o r a n6o nud b o t, 

tk.huru(.- oReotoor8kU1liltnlroMka 

A npor t on the ~Ildru 40 dfioU4' knd4, lal 1 uuo6g h 4 4 00a6 f wa ty b 4 dr C*r a y 4rp utl.0, 

se6 aal4 #rubas &all bo abJe.t to pywnt ea t 

l i 6h 4 f4 4o0 t sa il l fr leIo4 , & r uo 06b uo lo . 

pro vlfu 4 4 a 6h 4 o mr w a 004u1 4 pro d4 4fud - 

th 4r tb t u sa y or 6h 4 l mo4ro 00 ~4 o lg nok4 l o 

ooa ulrrynt&ortbm a foobar&thanall aoh ._ bor4 @?4mhm4 ior ofti44r4 4nC t&l? doputi.4 4htil 

bu pata tram 6h4 caIlera1mIla oitho oou?e~* . ..* 

Noat?ulu .&tlrk 3899(a), v. A, C. 80, a4 &nm 

b 1933, ir ulhr~MO4 OS ma60 tr Quo40, Paur OiTil Appwlo, 

106 6. W. (it) 97, 6h a o o er ht o ld 6bot l p eno u wh io h l 4ounty 

oiflel41 44s 0 is lu 44 ~odrotioor, Oth.? t&a tho40 la .4nae4- 

tioawithautombUaa,ax’o 1bit.d to l tatiomow, 4-p*, 

$ 4 lep h otrawl* no , l xp4no40, 4nd 06h4r dmllar a440444x7 .xp a JI6ho4 u, .mo lf 4 o u6nr r 6l iJoan r dW geo4r)rlo lEo pg . 

p llmtoqaalliytho a (~snorol langm$r by the op44lal4 uomrat44 ltar 4nd t0 rertriot it4 reani~ t4 l xp4nns oi tb 

saw kina ra(L olmrer64r. s&o40 tbr ru~&Uon of 6h@ Ca~oo 

ourth4arWa60 boo8ra aooAed toalla l utal~bondpromlum ~eaou* 

Artiokr $883 es4 369A foroon'~ Ansot4tod f'4xn8 

Cltll ~atateo, rood a8 #sr) a8 Zollarol 

aIko4pt l otbarri40 proridd in thlis Aot, 

th, annaal fuu 6hot my be retalneb by preeitwt, 

4044ty and dirtriot l rsisu0 m3snti080a in ChL 

AYtlOlo dltilbe a* r0uart 

ml* In ooaotl4r ealmlai 

3 

Westy firm (25,000) 

6houmad Or 140~ %Oh~bitiDtil 4uaty aag4, Dlotr1.t 4r crtolrml Distrl46 At6arn4y, ~h*riir, Oounty 

Clerk‘ Couoty Attomrf, Dbtrl4t Ci4ti, Tax OoU.Otor, 

Tu A444r44r or the Aouaoor aod Oolloator oi ‘-il. 

nwmty-four &ndre4 (t2J&O.001 Dollars eeaht . . .
#### STATE v. CALVIN SPENCER SMITH.

(Filed 23 November, 1955.)

Appeal and Error § 38—

Where the Supreme Court is evenly divided in opinion, the decision of the lower court will be affirmed without becoming a precedent.

Appeal by defendant from *Rudisill, J.,*at February-March Criminal Term, 1955, of Caldwell.

Criminal prosecution upon a warrant issued out of Recorder’s Court of Caldwell County, on affidavit charging that defendant did on 3 July, 1954, operate a motor vehicle upon the public highways of the State of North Carolina after operator’s license being revoked, heard on original warrant in Superior Court on appeal thereto by defendant from judgment of Judge of said Recorder’s Court dated 21 January, 1955.

Plea: Not guilty.

Verdict: Guilty as charged in said warrant.

Judgment: Pronounced.

Defendant excepts thereto and appeals therefrom to the Supreme Court, and assigns error.

*Attorney-General Rodman and Assistant Attorney-General Beh-rends, Jr., for the State.*

*Fate J. Beal and Marshall E. Cline for Defendant Appellant.*

PER CuRiAM.

The Court being evenly divided in opinion as to whether'error prejudicial to defendant is shown in the record on this appeal, *Higgins, J.,*not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed without becoming a precedent. *Cole v. R. R.,*211 N.C. 591, 191 S.E. 353; *Allen v. Ins. Co.,*211 N.C. 736, 190 S.E. 735, and cases cited. See also *Johnston v. Paper Co.,*214 N.C. 828, 199 S.E. 20; *Toxey v. Meggs,*216 N.C. 798, 4 S.E. 2d 513; *Howard v. Coach Co.,*216 N.C. 799, 4 S.E. 2d 616; *Whitehurst v. Anderson,*228 N.C. 787, 44 S.E. 2d 358; S. *v. Brown,*242 N.C. 602, 89 S.E. 2d 157; *Refrigerator Co. v. Davenport,*242 N.C. 603, 89 S.E. 2d 153; *Railway v. Railway, ante,*110, and numerous others.

Affirmed.
### Proposed Provision: B5.9. Beginning for those newly eligible in 2025, reconfigure the special minimum benefit: (a) A year of coverage is defined as a year in which 4 quarters of coverage are earned. (b) At implementation, set the PIA for 40 years of coverage equal to 125 percent of the monthly Aged Federal poverty level (about $1,462 in 2022). For those with 20 or fewer years of coverage, phase up linearly from 0 percent of the poverty level for 10 years of coverage to 100 percent of the poverty level. For those having between 20 and 40 years of coverage, phase up linearly from 100 percent of the poverty level at 20 years of coverage to 125% of the poverty level for 40 or more years of coverage. (c) For newly eligible workers in 2025 and 2026, index the applicable poverty level using the CPI index, to the year prior to eligibility. Then, for newly eligible workers in 2027 and later, index the PIA per year of coverage by wage growth for successive cohorts. (d) Disabled workers have a somewhat similar minimum benefit, with work requirements scaled based on the number of years of non-disabled potential work.
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4939    Filed: 12/02/19    Entered: 12/02/19 14:12:29    Page 1 of2

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4939    Filed: 12/02/19    Entered: 12/02/19 14:12:29    Page 2 of2
### Proposed Provision: B3.17. Increase the current-law first bend point by 22 percent and increase the 90 percent PIA factor to 95 percent for all beneficiaries eligible for benefits as of January 2024 and for those newly eligible for benefits after 2023. This provision will result in an approximate $257 increase in PIA for most workers newly eligible for retirement or disability benefits in 2024.
EXHIBIT
      23.1





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Form
      S-8 (Nos. 33-88422, 33-99196, 33-94974, 333-65799, 333-36159, 333-82418,
      333-82416 and 333-140539) Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-90017, 333-76614, 333-92174
      and 333-102334) and Form S-1 (File No. 333-138109) of Acorn Factor, Inc. of
      our
      report dated April 16, 2007 relating to the financial statements and financial
      statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.








/s/
      Kesselman & Kesselman


Tel
      Aviv,
      Israel


April
      16,
      2007
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                   EXHIBIT 11


                              EASTON BANCORP, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                                                Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
                                              ----------------------------------
                                                 2001        2000        1999
                                              ----------  ----------  ----------
<S>                                           <C>         <C>         <C>
Net income                                    $  454,957  $  503,745  $  494,345
                                              ==========  ==========  ==========


Average shares outstanding                       560,318     560,318     560,318
Basic earnings per share                      $     0.81  $     0.90  $     0.88
                                              ==========  ==========  ==========


Average shares outstanding                       560,318     560,318     560,318
Dilutive average shares outstanding under
      warrants and options                       263,800     263,800     245,236
Exercise price                                $    10.00  $    10.00  $    10.00
Assumed proceeds on exercise                  $2,638,000  $2,638,000  $2,452,360
Average market value                          $    10.33  $    10.63  $    10.16
Less: Treasury stock purchased with assumed
      proceeds from exercise of warrants and
      options                                    255,373     248,166     241,374
Adjusted average shares-diluted                  568,745     575,952     564,180
Diluted earnings per share                    $     0.80  $     0.87  $     0.88
                                              ==========  ==========  ==========
</TABLE>

     The stock of the Company is not traded on any public exchange.  The average
market  values  are  derived from trades known to management.  Private sales may
occur  where  management  of  the  Company  is  unaware  of  the  sales  price.


<PAGE>