alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3614 

To prohibit the importation of seafood and seafood products from the Russian 

Federation, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2022 

Mr. SULLIVAN (for himself and Ms. MURKOWSKI) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To prohibit the importation of seafood and seafood products 

from the Russian Federation, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘United States-Russian 

5 Federation Seafood Reciprocity Act of 2022’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress makes the following findings: 

8 (1) In 2014, the Russian Federation invaded 

9 and annexed the Crimean Peninsula from Ukraine. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3614 IS

1 (2) The United States and its allies imposed 

2 sanctions with respect to the Russian Federation as 

3 a result of that hostile and illegal action. 

4 (3) In retaliation, the Government of the Rus5 sian Federation imposed an embargo on agricultural 

6 products, including seafood, imported from the 

7 United States, the European Union, Australia, Can8 ada, and Norway. 

9 (4) Before imposing the embargo, the Russian 

10 Federation was an important export market for 

11 United States seafood products. 

12 (5) Russian-origin seafood products continue to 

13 enter to the United States market without restric14 tion and imports of such products increased roughly 

15 173 percent in value between 2013, the year before 

16 the imposition of the embargo, and 2020. 

17 SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON IMPORTATION OF SEAFOOD AND 

18 SEAFOOD PRODUCTS FROM THE RUSSIAN 

19 FEDERATION. 

20 The importation into the United States from the Rus21 sian Federation of any article classifiable under chapter 

22 3 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 

23 is prohibited. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3614 IS

1 SEC. 4. TERMINATION. 

2 The prohibition under section 3 shall terminate on 

3 the date on which the President determines and certifies 

4 Congress that the Government of the Russian Federation 

5 has terminated its prohibition on the importation of sea6 food products from the United States. 

7 SEC. 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

8 Section 3 applies with respect to articles entered, or 

9 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

10 the date that is 15 days after the date of the enactment 

11 of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 27 (Wednesday, February 10, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7120-7121]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02575]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Initial Review

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces a meeting for the initial review of 
applications in response to Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) 
SH16-001, Research and Methods in Health Statistics.
    Time And Date: 10:00 a.m.-4:30 p.m., March 3, 2016 (Closed).
    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with 
provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and 
the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services 
Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters For Discussion: The meeting will include the initial 
review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response 
to ``Research and Methods in Health Statistics'', FOA SH16-001.
    Contact Person For More Information: Virginia S. Cain, Ph.D., 
Director of Extramural Research, National Center for Health Statistics, 
CDC, 3311 Toledo Rd., Room 7208, Hyattsville, MD, Telephone: (301) 458-
4500.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both the Centers for Disease Control and

[[Page 7121]]

Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Gary Johnson,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2016-02575 Filed 2-9-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 1.97 1.60 55% 37%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

September 15, 2023

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable)

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: E2.2. Eliminate the taxable maximum in years 2024 and later, and apply full 12.4 

percent payroll tax rate to all earnings. Provide benefit credit for earnings above the current-law taxable 

maximum.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

22.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision
## United States Court of Appeals
**For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________

No. 22

- 2466

___________________________

United States of America

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Skye L. Nelson

Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of South Dakota - Southern

____________

Submitted: November 14, 2022 Filed: February 9, 2023 [Unpublished]

____________
Before BENTON, KELLY, and ERICKS ON, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Skye L. Nelson pled guilty to fai ling to register as a sex offender, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a). The district court sentenced him to 13 months in prison. Upon release, he violated the conditions of his release. The district court 1 sentenced

1 The Honorable Karen E. Schreier, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota.-2- him to 11 months in prison. He appeals the sentence. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.

Nelson challenges the substantive reasonable ne ss of his within

- guidelines

sentence. This court reviews for abuse of discretion. United States v. Edwards , 820 F.3d 362, 366 (8th Cir. 2016)

. “The sentencing court abuses its discretion when it (1) fails to consider a relevant factor that should have received significant weight; (2) gives significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor; or (3) considers the appropriate factors but commits a clear error of judgment in weighing them.” United
States v. Core y, 36 F.4th 819, 823 (8th Cir. 2022) (internal quotation marks omitted)

. A sentence within the g uideline range is presumptively reasonable. Id

.

At sentencing

, the district court relied on Nelson’s behavior during supervised release. He became “aggressive” at his first halfway house and was discharged “almost immediately after” he arrived . He was “disrespectful to staff” at the second halfway house and was asked to leave

. At a hotel p aid for with probation
office “second

- chance funds,” he violated curfew, had unauthorized guests, perhaps
allowed a drug deal in the room

, and failed to wear his electronic monitor

. Nelson claims the district court placed “inordinate” weight on his multiple supervised
release revocations in an earlier case

. However, a district court must consider the history and characteristics of a defendant in fashioning a revocation sentence. See U.S.C. §§ 3553(a)(1), 3583(e). Nelson’s argument that his prior behavio r on supervised release should receive less weight is “nothing more than a disagreement with how the district court chose to weigh the § 3553(a) factors.” United States v.
Brown , 992 F.3d 665, 673 (8th Cir. 2021). The district court properly considered Nelson’s behavior while on supervised release in this case and his repeated
violations in his earlier case . It did not abuse its discretion.

* * * * * * *

The judgment is affirmed.

______________________________
Mortality Overview

Office of the Chief Actuary

TPAM 2019 Meeting

December 14, 2018
Projecting Mortality

• Mortality rates are assumed to decline in the future. But • The annual Trustees Report (TR) uses three sets of (determ

projections:

• Low cost (alternative I)• Intermediate (alternative II)• High cost (alternative III)

2


Trustees Assumptions:

Ultimate Annual Rates of Declin

5 broad age groups:

1. Ages 0 – 142. Ages 15 – 493. Ages 50 – 644. Ages 65 – 845. Ages 85 and older

5 causes of death

1. Cardiovascula2. Cancer3. Violence4. Respiratory5. All other

5


Mortality Decline by Cause of Death:

Rate of Change from 1979 to 2017
How Future Conditions Might Cha

• Smoking decline for women

• Started and stopped later than men

• Obesity – sedentary lifestyle• Difference by income/earnings• Health spending – must decelerate

• Advances help only if they apply to all

• Human limits

• Increasing understanding of deceleration

9
Is there an Omega?

Rectangularizing the survival curve

10
Cardiovascular: JHU Less Optimistic t

Trustees Over Age 50 for Next 30 Ye
Respiratory: JHU More Optimistic Un

Age 50; Less Optimistic Over Age 8
Cancer: JHU Very Similar to Trustee

Expectations
For More Information...

https://www.ssa.gov/OACT/index.html

• Annual Trustees Reports:

https://www.ssa.gov/OACT/TR/index.html

• Documentation of Trustees Report data and assumptions:

https://www.ssa.gov/OACT/TR/2018/2018_Long-Range_Demographic_

• Historical and Projected mortality rates:

https://www.ssa.gov/OACT/HistEst/DeathHome.html

14
Appendix
Various Alternative Projecti

Approaches Using Data

• Extrapolating past trends

• Age setback (early method)• Mortality rate by age and sex (Lee/Carter)• Life Expectancy at birth (Vaupel/Oeppen)• Mortality rates by trend all ages (2011 Technical Panel, CBO 2013 – 

• Or reflect changing conditions

• Improvement by cohort (UK CMI, SOA)• Mortality rate by age, sex, cause (OCACT TR, 2015 Technical Panel)

16
Will Life Expectancy Rise Line

Vaupel/Oeppen 2002; Best Nations

• Requires accelerating rate of 

decline in mortality rates if retain age gradient

• LE most affected by lowest ages –

only so much gain possible

• Most disagree

• Vallin/Meslé

17
Appropriate Data: by Age C

Age gradient in past reduction is cle

18
Trends in Obesity: US 1971-2

Sam Preston 2010 – must consider cumulativ

Increasing duration of obesity for aged in the 

19
Does Health Spending Affect Mo

Note rise, at least through 2009

20
Health Spending Cannot Continue 

at Historical Rates

Note Trustees’ deceleration

21
Mortality By Career-Average Earning

Actuarial Study #124

22

• Compared the death rates among retired-worker beneficiarie

age group, and lifetime career-average earnings level (AIME) annual death rate among retired-worker beneficiaries for thaage group.

• For each sex and age group, we calculated the relative morta

various AIME levels.
Age Group 65-69 Relative Mortality Ratios

23
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 241 (Friday, December 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 64423]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30542]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Army Science Board; Notice of Closed Meeting

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following 
Committee Meeting:

    Name of Committee: Army Science Board (ASB).
    Date of Meeting: 14 December 1995.
    Time of Meeting: 1300-1700.
    Place: Pentagon--Washington, DC.
    Agenda: The Army Science Board's Research and Development (R&D) 
Sub-panel for the Ad Hoc Study on ``Reengineering the Acquisition 
and Modernization Processes of the Institutional Army'' will meet 
for briefings and discussions on the R&D processes and ways to 
improve efficiency. This meeting will be closed to the public in 
accordance with Section 552b(c) of Title 5, U.S.C., specifically 
subparagraph (1) thereof, and Title 5, U.S.C., Appendix 2, 
subsection 10(d). The classified and unclassified matters to be 
discussed are so inextricably intertwined so as to preclude opening 
any portion of this meeting. For further information, please contact 
Michelle Diaz at (703) 695-0781.
Michelle P. Diaz,
Acting Administrative Officer, Army Science Board.
[FR Doc. 95-30542 Filed 12-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
Pursuant to5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , th e co urt has determined that this opinionsho uld not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except und er the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 41294 C onfer enc e Cal endar
UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee
v. J O S E C A R L O S P IN E D A , D e fe nda nt
- Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e S ou t h ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SDC N o . 5 : 0 8
- CR- 1 2 3 7
- ALL
B e fo r e W IE N E R , B E N AV ID E S , a n d S T E W A R T , C ir c u it J u d g e s . P E R C U R I A M: * Th e Feder alPu bl i c D ef enderappoi nt ed t o rep res ent Jos e Carl os Pi neda has m o ve d f

o rl e av e t o w i t hdr aw and has f i l e d a b r i e f

i n a c c o r da nc e w i t h A n d ers v. Califor n ia , 3 86 U
. S. 7 38 ( 19 67 )
. Pi ne da ha s no tf i l e d a r e s po ns e . Our i nde pe nde ntr e vi e w o f t he r e c o r d a nd c o uns e l ’ s b r i e f di s c l o s e s no no nf

r i vo l o us is s u e fo ra p p e a l. A c c o r d i n g ly , co u n s e l’ s m o tio n fo rle a v e to w ith d r a w is GRANTED, c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s ib i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a nd t he A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D
. S ee5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 20, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S

NO. WR-91, 563-01

EX P ART E ALF RE DO GONZ AL EZ , Appl icant

ON AP P LI CAT I ON F OR A WRIT OF HAB EA S CORP US CAUSE NO. W13504-1 I N THE 355TH DI STRI CT COURT

F ROM HOOD COUNT Y

P er cur iam

.

O P I N I O N

A ppl i can t was co n v i ct ed o f po s s es s i o n wi

t h i n t en t t o del i v er m et h am ph et am i n e an d un l awf

ul

po s s es s i o n o f a f

i rearm b y a f

el o n an d s en

t en ced t o i

m pri s o n m e nt

. T he Seco n d Co urt o f A ppeal s

af f i rm ed h i s co n

v i ct i o n s

. Gonz alez v. State

, No

. 02-17- 00373-CR (T ex

. A pp. —F o rt W o rt h del

. F eb

.
28, 2019). A

ppl i can t f i l ed t h i s appl i cat i o n f

o r a wri t o f h ab eas co rpus i n t h e co un t y o f co n v i ct i o n , an d

t h e di s t ri ct cl erk f

o rwarded i

t t o t h i s Co urt

. See T E X

. C O D E C R I M

. P R O C

. art

. 11. 07.

A ppl i can t co n t en ds t h at
, t h

ro ugh n o f

aul t o f h i s o wn , h e was den i ed h i s ri gh t t o f i l e a pr o s e

pet i t i o n f o r d i s c ret i o n ary rev i ew i

n t h i s Co urt

. See T E X

. R. A P P

. P R O C

. 68. 2. T h e h ab eas reco rd

s uppo rt s A

ppl i can t ’ s cl ai m

. Re l i ef i s gran

t ed. E x par te R iley

, 193 S

. W. 3 d 9 0 0 (T ex

. Cri m

. A pp.

2006); E x parte Cr ow , 180 S. W

. 3d 135 (T ex

. Cri m

. A pp. 2005).2

A ppl i can t m ay f i l e an o ut -o f

- t i m e pet i t i o n f o r di s cret i o n ary rev i ew o f t h e j udgm en t s o f t h e

Seco n d Co urt o f A

ppeal s i n caus e n um be r 02-17- 00373-CR. Sh o ul d A ppl i can t deci de t o f

i l e a

pet i t i o n f o r di s cret i o n ary rev i ew, h e m us t f i l e i t wi t h t h i s Co urt wi

t h i n t h i rt y day s f ro m t h e dat e o f t h i s

Co urt ’ s m an dat e.

Co pi es o f t h i s o pi

n i o n s h al l b e s en

t t o t h e T ex as Depa

rt m en t o f Cri m i n al J us t i ce–C o rr ect i o n al

In s t i t ut i o n s Di v i s i o n an d t h e Bo ard o f Pardo n s an d Paro l es

.

Del i v ered: J an

uary 13, 2021 Do n o t pub l i s h
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5410 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

25 New York Avenue in Sound Beach, New York, as the ‘‘John Moerlins 

Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2014 

Mr. BISHOP of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 25 New York Avenue in Sound Beach, New 

York, as the ‘‘John Moerlins Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JOHN MOERLINS POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 25 New York Avenue in Sound 

6 Beach, New York, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘John Moerlins Post Office’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5410 IH

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘John Moerlins Post 

3 Office’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3482 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3482

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 3493 Burnet Avenue in Cincinnati, Ohio, as the ``John H. Leahr and 
                   Herbert M. Heilbrun Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 12 (legislative day, January 10), 2022

Mr. Portman (for himself and Mr. Brown) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 3493 Burnet Avenue in Cincinnati, Ohio, as the ``John H. Leahr and 
                   Herbert M. Heilbrun Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JOHN H. LEAHR AND HERBERT M. HEILBRUN POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 3493 Burnet Avenue in Cincinnati, Ohio, shall be known and 
designated as the ``John H. Leahr and Herbert M. Heilbrun Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``John H. 
Leahr and Herbert M. Heilbrun Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 -0.06 -0.08 -2% -2%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

September 15, 2023

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Level of Monthly Benefits

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: B6.7. Starting in January 2030, provide an addition to monthly benefits for all 

beneficiaries who have been eligible for at least 20 years, with the following specifications: (1) Augment 

benefits (not the PIA) for those of qualifying age and eligibility duration with a MAGI below about $29,400 

if single and $58,800 if married. MAGI is set to equal the IRMAA definition (AGI plus tax-exempt interest 

income). Index these thresholds after 2030 by the increase in the C-CPI-U; (2) The full additional amount 

is applicable for those born 1963 and later, once 24 years elapse from initial eligibility. The basic 

additional amount is calculated as 5 percent of the PIA for a hypothetical worker with earnings equal to 

the AWI each year; (3) For those born prior to 1963, the full additional amount is multiplied by the number 

of years they have been affected by the C-CPI-U, divided by 24; (4) Beneficiaries will receive 20 percent 

of their additional amount in their 20th year after initial eligibility, 40 percent in their 21st year after initial 

eligibility,..., and 100 percent of their additional amount in their 24th and later years after benefit eligibility; 

(5) Retired and disabled worker beneficiaries, dually entitled spouse beneficiaries, and all survivor 

beneficiaries received their addition as described above. Spousal beneficiaries (aged or with child in 

care) and child beneficiaries of a living retired or disabled worker receive 50 percent of the additional 

amount described above. Other beneficiary types (such as parents of deceased workers) will receive the 

percentage of the flat benefit that equals the percentage of the insured worker's PIA that they receive; (6) 

The AWI used is for the second year prior to the beneficiary's initial eligibility year, with applicable 

COLAs applied up to the age when the addition is received; and (7) The additional amount is added to the 

monthly benefit after reductions for early claiming or increases for delayed claiming have been applied.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision