[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8670-8726]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3729]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Policy Development and Research
[Docket No. N-95-3883]


Notice of Submission of Proposed Information Collection to OMB

AGENCY: Office of Administration, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The proposed information collection requirement described 
below has been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 
for expedited review, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act. The 
Department is soliciting public comments on the subject proposal.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding 
this proposal. Comments should refer to the proposal by name and should 
be sent to: Joseph F. Lackey, Jr., OMB Desk Officer, Office of 
Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 
20503.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 27, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kay F. Weaver, Reports Management Officer, Department of Housing and 
Urban Development, 451 7th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20410, telephone 
no. (202) 708-0050. This is not a toll-free number. Copies of the 
proposed forms and other available documents submitted to OMB may be 
obtained from Ms. Weaver.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice informs the public that the 
Department of Housing and Urban Development has submitted to OMB for 
expedited processing an information collection package with respect to 
``Impact of Disaster on Low-Income Rental Housing: Lessons from the 
Northridge Earthquake''. HUD is requesting a 10 day OMB review of this 
information collection.
    HUD is interested in learning as much as possible from the recent 
earthquake experience in Los Angeles so that the multifamily rebuilding 
process occurs efficiently and loss of low-income rental housing can be 
minimized when the next large-scale disaster strikes. This study will 
provide HUD systematic information about the impact of the earthquake 
on low-income rental housing.
    The Department has submitted the proposal for the collection of 
information, as described below, to OMB for review, as required by the 
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35):
    (1) The title of the information collection proposal;
    (2) The office of the agency to collect the information;
    (3) The description of the need for the information and its 
proposed use;
    (4) The agency from number, if applicable;
    (5) What members of the public will affected by the proposal;
    (6) How frequently information submission will be required;
    (7) An estimate of the total number of hours needed to prepare the 
information submission including numbers of respondents, frequency of 
response, and hours of response;
    (8) Whether the proposal is new or an extension, reinstatement, or 
revision of an information collection requirement; and
    (9) The names and telephone numbers of an agency official familiar 
with the proposal and of the OMB Desk Officer for the Department.

    Authority: Section 3507 of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 
U.S.C. 3507; Section 7(d) of the Department of Housing and Urban 
Development Act, 42 U.S.C. 3535(d).

    Dated: February 1, 1995.
Michael A. Stegman,
Assistant Secretary, Office of Policy Development and Research.

Notice of Submission of Proposed Information Collection to OMB

    Proposal: Information Collection Associated with the ``Impact of 
Disaster on Low-Income Rental Housing: Lessons from the Northridge 
Earthquake''.
    Office: Office of Police Development and Research
    Description of the need for proposed information and its proposed 
use: On January 17, 1994, a severe earthquake struck the Los Angeles 
metropolitan area, causing considerable damage to area housing. 
Reconstruction presented a major challenge for local, state and federal 
housing officials, especially reconstruction of low-income rental 
housing, a segment of the market particularly vulnerable to loss. The 
study will provide systematic information about the impact of the 
Northridge earthquake on low-income rental housing. Four data 
collection instruments will be used: (1) the Property-Owner Survey will 
be used to address a number issue, including the extent of earthquake 
damage, the physical and financial characteristics of damaged 
properties, owner reconstruction plans and financing, and recommended 
improvements to public assistance programs; (2) the Sample Monitoring 
Survey will explore major changes in reconstruction plans stated during 
the initial data collection effort; (3) the Follow-up Surveys will 
determine progress of reconstruction efforts, and identify major 
changes in stated reconstruction plans; and (4) the case study 
interview guide will detail the resources being used for reconstruction 
and problems being encountered by owners as well as detailed 
characteristics of the projects before and after the quake.
    Form Number: None
    Respondents: Property Owners of properties affected by the 
Northridge Earthquake
    Frequency of Submission: On time.
    Reporting Burden:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 No. of      Time to                    Burden  
             Form                       Respondents           respondents    complete    Frequency      hours   
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Property-owner...............  Property-owners..............          250  30 min.....            1          125
Sample monitoring............  Property-owners..............           60  5 min......            1            3
Follow-up....................  Property-owners..............          200  10 min.....            1         33.3
Case study...................  Property-owners..............           20  120 min....            1           40
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                                BILLING CODE: 4210-33-M
[[Page 8671]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.079


[[Page 8672]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.080


[[Page 8673]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.081


[[Page 8674]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.082


[[Page 8675]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.083


[[Page 8676]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.084


[[Page 8677]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.085


[[Page 8678]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.086


[[Page 8679]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.087


[[Page 8680]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.088


[[Page 8681]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.089


[[Page 8682]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.090


[[Page 8683]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.091


[[Page 8684]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.092


[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.093


[[Page 8685]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.094


[[Page 8686]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.095


[[Page 8687]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.096


[[Page 8688]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.097


[[Page 8689]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.098


[[Page 8690]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.099


[[Page 8691]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.100


[[Page 8692]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.101


[[Page 8693]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.102


[[Page 8694]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.103


[[Page 8695]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.104


[[Page 8696]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.105


[[Page 8697]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.106


[[Page 8698]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.107


[[Page 8699]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.108


[[Page 8700]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.109


[[Page 8701]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.110


[[Page 8702]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.111


[[Page 8703]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.112


[[Page 8704]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.113


[[Page 8705]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.114


[[Page 8706]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.115


[[Page 8707]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.116


[[Page 8708]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.117


[[Page 8709]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.118


[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.119


[[Page 8710]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.120


[[Page 8711]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.121


[[Page 8712]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.122


[[Page 8713]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.123


[[Page 8714]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.124


[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.125


[[Page 8715]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.126


[[Page 8716]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.127


[[Page 8717]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.128


[[Page 8718]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.129


[[Page 8719]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.130


[[Page 8720]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.131


[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.132


[[Page 8721]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.133


[[Page 8722]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.134


[[Page 8723]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.135


[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.136


[[Page 8724]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.137


[[Page 8725]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.138


[[Page 8726]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.139


[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN15FE95.140


[FR Doc. 95-3729 Filed 2-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-62-C