alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ZHEN PAN,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 14-70981

Agency No. A088-495-206

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 14, 2016**

Before: BEA, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Zhen Pan, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of 

Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s 

decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and 

protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUN 24 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 14-70981 

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual 

findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility determinations 

created by the REAL ID Act. Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039-40 (9th 

Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination 

based on inconsistencies between Pan’s testimony and documentary evidence as to 

the date of her ultrasound examination and omissions of the neighborhood 

committee’s threats. See id. at 1048 (adverse credibility determination reasonable 

under the “totality of circumstances”). Pan’s explanations do not compel a 

contrary result. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1245 (9th Cir. 2000). Thus, in 

the absence of credible testimony, Pan’s asylum and withholding of removal 

claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).

Finally, Pan’s CAT claim fails because it is based on the same testimony the 

agency found not credible, and Pan does not point to any other evidence in the 

record that compels the conclusion that it is more likely than not she would be 

tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official in China. See 

Farah, 348 F.3d at 1156-57.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
#### CONTINENTAL MORTGAGE COMPANY v. CITIZENS BANK AND TRUST COMPANY et al.

(Filed 6 June, 1930.)

Appeal 'by defendants from *Sch&nck, J.,*at March .Term, 1930, of RuNcombe.

Affirmed.

*Arledge & Taylor for appellants.*

*Heazel, Shuford & Hartshorn for appellee.*

Peb Cubiam.

Tbe demurrer filed by tbe defendants admits all tbe allegations of tbe complaint, among wbicb is an allegation tbat tbe defendants are indebted to tbe plaintiff in a stated amount. Tbe judgment overruling tbe demurrer is

Affirmed.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3596 

To amend title XXI of the Social Security Act to disregard State expenditures 

on health services initiatives to increase access to behavioral health services for children in schools for purposes of the reimbursement limitation 

on expenditures under the Children’s Health Insurance Program that 

are not related to Medicaid or health insurance assistance. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 8 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 3), 2022 

Mr. THUNE (for himself and Mr. MENENDEZ) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XXI of the Social Security Act to disregard 

State expenditures on health services initiatives to increase access to behavioral health services for children 

in schools for purposes of the reimbursement limitation 

on expenditures under the Children’s Health Insurance 

Program that are not related to Medicaid or health insurance assistance. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘CHIP School Behav5 ioral Health Incentive Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3596 IS

1 SEC. 2. DISREGARD OF STATE EXPENDITURES ON HEALTH 

2 SERVICES INITIATIVES TO INCREASE ACCESS 

3 TO BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES FOR 

4 CHILDREN IN SCHOOLS FOR PURPOSES OF 

5 THE CHIP REIMBURSEMENT LIMITATION ON 

6 EXPENDITURES NOT USED FOR MEDICAID OR 

7 HEALTH INSURANCE ASSISTANCE. 

8 Section 2105(c)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 

9 U.S.C. 1397ee(c)(2)) is amended by adding at the end the 

10 following new subparagraph: 

11 ‘‘(D) DISREGARD OF EXPENDITURES FOR

12 HEALTH SERVICES INITIATIVE FOR BEHAV13 IORAL HEALTH SERVICES IN SCHOOLS.— 

14 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—Beginning with 

15 the first fiscal year that begins after the 

16 date of enactment of this subparagraph 

17 (or, if earlier, the fiscal year in which guid18 ance issued by the Secretary to implement 

19 this subparagraph takes effect), the 

20 amount of any expenditures described in 

21 clause (ii) for a fiscal year shall be dis22 regarded for purposes of applying the limi23 tation under subparagraph (A) for such 

24 fiscal year, except that in no case shall the 

25 amount of payment that may be made 

26 under subsection (a) for a fiscal year for 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3596 IS

1 expenditures subject to such limitation (in2 cluding expenditures described in clause 

3 (ii)) exceed 15 percent. 

4 ‘‘(ii) EXPENDITURES DESCRIBED.— 

5 Expenditures described in this clause are 

6 expenditures by a State to implement or 

7 operate a health services initiative under 

8 the State child health plan under this title 

9 that would improve the health of children 

10 by increasing access to behavioral health 

11 services in schools.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 243 (Tuesday, December 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 65327]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30729]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Julie Christine Yarbrough, et al.; Change in Bank Control 
Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. Once the notices have been accepted for 
processing, they will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later 
than January 2, 1996.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166:
    1. Julie Christine Yarbrough, Shawnee, Kansas; to acquire an 
additional 7.31 percent, for a total of 31.93 percent, of the voting 
shares of B.B. Bancshares, Inc., Shell Knob, Missouri, and thereby 
indirectly acquire The Community Bank of Shell Knob, Shell Knob, 
Missouri.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (James M. Lyon, Vice 
President) 250 Marquette Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480:
    1. Richard F. Wartman, Ashland, Wisconsin; and Eugene A. Halker, 
Ashland, Wisconsin (as trustee), to each acquire an additional 7.32 
percent, for a total of 30.96 percent; Laura G. Halker, Ashland, 
Wisconsin (as trustee), to acquire an additional 6.15 percent, for a 
total of 26.01 percent; Dennis K. Christensen, Ontonagon, Michigan, to 
acquire an additional 7.31 percent, for a total of 30.90 percent; and 
Halker Joint Revocable Trust, Ashland, Wisconsin, to acquire an 
additional 6.15 percent, for a total of 26.01 percent, of the voting 
shares of UP Financial, Inc., Ontonagon, Michigan, and thereby 
indirectly acquire First National Bank in Ontonagon, Ontonagon, 
Michigan.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 13, 
1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-30729 Filed 12-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           9,480
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,665
<PP&E>                                           7,477
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,269
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 131,957
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          427,536
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        252
<COMMON>                                           675
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,436,667
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   131,957
<SALES>                                          6,702
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,702
<CGS>                                          787,754
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,117,650
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,110,948
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,110,948)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.19)



</TABLE>
#### W. H. BOWSER et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS et al.

Division One,

June 1, 1911.

Appeal from St. Lonis City Circuit *Court.*— Hon. *Matt G. Reynolds,*Judge.

Dismissed.

*Geo. 8. Grover*for appellants.

*L. E. Walther*and *T. P. Young*for respondents.

WOODSON, J.

— This case is on all-fours with the case of Hicks v. City of St. Louis, decided at the present sitting of the court, and reported at page 647; and the ruling in that case is controlling in this one. The appeal, therefore, is dismissed.

All concur.
#### EUGENE CARSON, Minor, by his Next Friend, MYRTLE CARSON v ESPER DEDMON and GASTON CLARK WALL.

(Filed 21 September, 1960.)

Appeal by defendant Wall from *McLean, J.,*January 1960 Term, Rutherford Superior Court.

Civil action for personal injury sustained in a collision between automobiles owned and driven by the defendants. The plaintiff was a passenger in the Wall vehicle. The collision occurred on a one-way bridge over Floyd’s Creek in Rutherford County. The plaintiff alleg*63ed, and offered evidence tending to show actionable negligence on the part of each of the defendants and that as a result thereof he sustained- injuries and damages.

Each defendant denied negligence, claiming he was first on the bridge, and that the other was at fault. Motions for nonsuit were overruled. Dedmon introduced evidence; Walt did not.

■■ The court submitted separate issues of negligence which the jury answered in favor of Dedmon and against Wall. From the judgment on-the verdipt, Wall appealed.

*C. 0. Ridings, Jack M. Freeman, Stover P. Dunagan, for plaintiff, appellee.*

*A. Clyde Tomblin, for defendant, appellant.*

Pek Cueiam:

The jury resolved the issues of fact against the appellant Wall. The evidence was sufficient to sustain the findings. The court’s rulings and charge are in accordance with established law.

No error.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Inherited Disease Research Access Committee.                    

*Date:*                         March 4, 2016.                    

*Time:*                         11:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Suite 3049, 5635 Fishers Lane, Bethesda, MD 20892,  (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Barbara J Thomas, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 2218, MSC 7890, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-0603,                         *bthomas@csr.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 4, 2016.

Sylvia Neal,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2016-02537 Filed 2-8-16; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<PAGE>
 
                                                                     Exhibit 3.3

                           CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                      OF
                     RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                      OF
                           SYQUEST TECHNOLOGY, INC.



     SyQuest Technology, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by
virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware,

     DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

     FIRST:   That at a meeting of the Board of Directors of SyQuest Technology,
Inc., resolutions were duly adopted setting forth a proposed amendment of the
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation, declaring said
amendment to be advisable and recommending such resolution at the 1997 annual
meeting of the stockholders of said corporation for consideration thereof.  The
resolution setting forth the proposed amendment is as follows:

     RESOLVED, that Paragraph (A) of Article IV of the Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of this corporation be amended to read in its entirety as follows:

          Classes of Stock. This corporation is authorized to issue the
          ----------------
     following classes of stock: Common Stock ("Common Stock" or "Common") and
     Preferred Stock ("Preferred Stock" or "Preferred"). The total number of
     shares which the corporation is authorized to issue is One Hundred Twenty
     Four Million (124,000,000). One Hundred Twenty Million (120,000,000) shares
     shall be Common Stock and Four Million (4,000,000) shares shall be
     Preferred Stock. Each share of Common and Preferred Stock shall have a par
     value of $0.0001.

     SECOND:  That thereafter, pursuant to resolution of its Board of Directors,
a special meeting of the stockholders of said corporation was duly called and
held, upon notice in accordance with Section 222 of the General Corporation Law
of the State of Delaware at which meeting the necessary number of shares as
required by statute were voted in favor of the amendment.

     THIRD:  That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the
provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.
<PAGE>
 
     IN WITNESS THEREOF, said SyQuest Technology, Inc. has caused this
certificate to be signed by Edward L. Marinaro, its authorized officer, this 6th
day of May, 1997.

                                             SYQUEST TECHNOLOGY, INC.



                                             By /Edward L. Marinaro/
                                                --------------------
                                             Title Chairman of the Board
                                                   ---------------------

                                       2
#### LEWIS PERRY v. CAROLINA BOTTLING COMPANY.

(Filed 30 November, 1932.)

'Appeal by defendant from *Barnhill, J.,*at March Term, 1932, of Ieedell.

No error.

*Grier, Grier & Joyner and E. M. Land for appellant.*

*Zeb V. Turlington and Hugh G. Mitchell for appellee.*

Pet Curiam.

The controversy between the parties involves issues of fact determinable by settled principles of law, in the application of which we find no error. *Perry v. Bottling Co.,*196 N. C., 175; *S. c., ibid.,*690; *Broom v. Bottling Co.,*200 N. C., 55.

No error.
Raw Data - 2022

Action Office Request ID Request Type Received Date Perfected 

Request

Closed Date Exemption Cited Final Disposition Processed 

Days

Multi-Track 

Type

Total Days on 

Hold

Expedite Start 

Date

Expedite End 

Date

Adjudicate Days 

(Expedite)

Expedite Status Fee Waiver Start 

Date

Fee Waiver End Date Adjudicate Days 

(Fee Waiver)

Fee Waiver 

Status

Amount Paid 

($)

USSPACECOM 22-F-001 Referral 18-Mar-19 18-Mar-19 Complex Not requested 18-Mar-19 18-Mar-19 1 Denied

USSPACECOM 22-F-002 Referral 26-Apr-19 30-Apr-19 Complex 2 Not requested Not requested

USSPACECOM 22-F-003 Referral 7-Aug-20 7-Aug-20 Complex Not requested Not requested

USSPACECOM 22-F-004 Referral 6-Dec-20 6-Dec-20 Complex Not requested Not requested

USSPACECOM 22-F-005 Referral 4-Mar-21 4-Mar-21 Expedited 11-May-21 13-May-21 2 Granted Not requested

USSPACECOM 22-F-006 Referral 26-Apr-21 5-May-21 Complex 7 Not requested Not requested

USSPACECOM 22-F-007 Referral 6-Jul-21 6-Jul-21 1-Oct-21 n/a Full Release 62 Complex Not requested 12-Jul-21 12-Jul-21 1 Denied $0

USSPACECOM 22-F-008 Referral 24-Aug-21 30-Aug-21 4-Oct-21 n/a Full Release 24 Complex 4 Not requested Not requested $0

USSPACECOM 22-F-009 Referral 21-Oct-21 21-Oct-21 18-Aug-22 (5),(6) Partial Release 206 Complex Not requested Not requested $0

USSPACECOM 22-F-010 Referral 7-Dec-21 7-Dec-21 16-Feb-22 n/a Total Denial 48 Complex Not requested Not requested $0

USSPACECOM 22-F-011 Referral 17-Dec-21 17-Dec-21 20-Dec-21 n/a Total Denial 1 Simple Not requested Not requested $0

USSPACECOM 22-F-012 Referral 28-Dec-21 28-Dec-21 Expedited 28-Dec-21 4-Jan-22 4 Granted 28-Dec-21 3-Jan-22 3 Denied

USSPACECOM 22-F-013 Referral 21-Feb-22 25-Feb-21 Complex 4 Not requested Not requested

USSPACECOM 22-F-014 Referral 23-May-22 23-May-22 Complex Not requested Not requested

USSPACECOM 22-R-015 Request 2-Aug-22 2-Aug-22 15-Sep-22 (6), (7)(C) Total Denial 30 Complex Not requested Not requested $0

USSPACECOM 22-R-016 Request 25-Aug-22 13-Sep-22 22-Sep-22 n/a Total Denial 7 Simple 13 Not requested Not requested $0

USSPACECOM 22-C-001 Consult 30-Aug-22 22-Sep-22 Complex Not requested Not rquested

USSPACECOM 22-R-017 Request 27-Sep-22 27-Sep-22 Not requested Not requested
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 27 (Thursday, February 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7796]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3257]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice (95-020)]


NASA Advisory Council, Space Science Advisory Committee, Space 
Physics Subcommittee; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act Public 
Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration announces a forthcoming meeting of the NASA Advisory 
Council, Space Science Advisory Committee, Space Physics Subcommittee.

DATES: Tuesday, February 28, 1995, 8:30 a.m. to 6 p.m.; and Wednesday 
and Thursday, March 1 and 2, 1995, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 300 E Street, 
SW., February 28, 1995, Conference Room MIC 7, side A and B, and March 
1 and 2, 1995, 9th floor Program Review Center, Room 9H40, Washington, 
DC 20546.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dr. George L. Withbroe, Code SS, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration, Washington, DC 20546, 202/358-1544.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting is as follows:

--Space Physics Division Overview: Budget, Ongoing Program, Future 
Activities
--Program Reports for Magnetospheric Physics, Cosmic and Heliospheric 
Physics, Solar Physics, Ionospheric-Thermospheric-Mesospheric Physics
--Space Physics Research and Analysis Program.
--Suborbital Program
--Strategic Planning
--Discussion and Writing Groups

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors 
will be requested to sign a visitor's register.

    Dated: February 3, 1995.
Timothy M. Sullivan,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 95-3257 Filed 2-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M
#### Frederick Bill, Respondent, v. James D. Fish, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Opinion by

Daniels, J.
|                                            |        |                |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|----------------|
|                                       |   |           |
| Subsidiary                                 |   | Jurisdiction   |
| Activant Solutions Canada Limited          |   | Canada         |
| Activant Solutions Espana SL               |   | Spain          |
| Activant Solutions Ireland Ltd.            |   | Ireland        |
| Activant Solutions UK, Ltd.                |   | United Kingdom |
| HM Coop LLC                                |   | Delaware       |
| Internet Auto Parts, Inc.                  |   | Delaware       |
| Activant Solutions de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. |   | Mexico         |