alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### LORETTA FRAZIER, Administratrix, v. PIEDMONT AND NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY et al.

(Filed 23 December, 1931.)

1. Appeal and Error J d — The burden is on the appellant to show error.

On appeal from an order granting a motion for removal from the State to the Federal Court for diversity of citizenship and fraudulent joinder where the requisite jurisdictional amount is shown, the burden is on the appellant to overcome the presumption against error.

3. Appeal and Error E a — Appeal in this case is dismissed for insufficiency of record.

Where the record on appeal fails to set out the summons or to indicate that the resident defendant had been served, and fails to show organization of court and that the court was properly held at the place and time prescribed by law, the appeal will be dismissed.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Cowper, Special Judge,*at October Special Term, 1931, of MecicleNbueg (as shown on. face of judgment).

Civil action to recover damages for an alleged wrongful death, brought against Piedmont and Northern Eailway Company, a corporation chartered under the laws of the State of South Carolina, and F. E. Williams, citizen and resident of Mecklenburg County, N. 0.

Motion by nonresident, corporate defendant to remove cause to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of North Carolina for trial. Motion allowed, and plaintiff appeals.

6r. *T. Carswell and Joe. W. Ervin for plaintiff.*

*W. S. O’B. Robinson, Jr., for defendant, Piedmont and Northern Railway Company.*

Stacy, 0. J.

The petition for removal, besides showing the presence of the requisite jurisdictional amount, asserts a right of removal on the grounds of diverse citizenship, and alleges that the resident defendant has been fraudulently joined to prevent such removal.

The trial court held that the case was controlled by the line of decisions of which *Cox v. Lamber Co.,*193 N. C., 28, 136 S. E., 254, *Johnson v. Lumber Co.,*189 N. C., 81, 126 S. E., 165, and *Rea v. Mirror Co.,*158 N. C., 24, 73 S. E., 116, may be cited as fairly illustrative; while the appellant contends that the principles announced in *Givens v. Mfg. Co.,*196 N. C., 377, 145 S. E., 681, and *Crisp v. Fibre Co.,*193 N. C., 77, 136 S. E., 238, are more nearly applicable.

Without “threshing over old straw,” suffice it to say, appellant has not overcome the presumption against error. *Bailey v. McKay,*198 N. C., *12638, 152 S. E., 893. To prevail on appeal, be wbo alleges error must successfully bandle tbe laboring oar. *Poindexter v. R. R.,*201 N. C., 833, 160 S. E., 767; *Jackson v. Bell,*201 N. C., 336, 159 S. E., 926.

But for another reason tbe appeal must be dismissed. There is no summons in tbe record or anything to indicate that tbe resident defendant has been served, and the transcript fails to show organization of court *(S. v. May,*118 N. C., 1204, 24 S. E., 118), or that “court was held by a judge authorized to bold it, and at tbe place and time prescribed by law” (S. *v. Butts,*91 N. C., 524). *Pruitt v. Wood,*199 N. C., 788, 156 S. E., 126.

Appeal dismissed.
#### IN THE MATTER OF THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF H. P. WHITSETT.

(Filed 2 April, 1930.)

Appeal by propounder from *Cranmer, J.,*at September. Term, 1929, of Alamance. No error.

This is a caveat to the probate of a paper-writing as the last will and testament of H. P. Whitsett, deceased.

The issues submitted to the jury were answered as follows:

“1. Was the execution of the paper-writing purporting to be the last will and testament of H. P. Whitsett procured by the fraud and undue influence of Walter P. Moser? Answer: Yes.

2. Did H. P. Whitsett, at the time of the execution of the said paper-writing, to wit, *1*May, 1926, have sufficient mental capacity to execute a will? Answer: No.

3. Is the paper-writing propounded and every part thereof, the last will and testament of H. P. Whitsett? Answer: No.”

From judgment in accordance with the verdict, the propounder appealed to the Supreme Court.

*C. A. Hall and Coulter, Cooper & Carr for propounder.*

*Julius C. Smith and J. Dolph Dong' fm' caveators.*

Pee Cdeiam.

The assignments of error on this appeal are based upon exceptions to the rulings of the court upon objections to the admission and rejection of testimony offered as evidence, and to instructions in the charge of the court to the jury. They cannot be sustained. There was no error upon the trial and the judgment is affirmed.

No error.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), as Receiver for 10303 Progress Bank of Florida, Tampa, Florida (Receiver) has been authorized to take all actions necessary to terminate the receivership estate of Progress Bank of Florida (Receivership Estate); the Receiver has made all dividend distributions required by law.

The Receiver has further irrevocably authorized and appointed FDIC-Corporate as its attorney-in-fact to execute and file any and all documents that may be required to be executed by the Receiver which FDIC-Corporate, in its sole discretion, deems necessary; including but not limited to releases, discharges, satisfactions, endorsements, assignments and deeds.

Effective February 1, 2016, the Receivership Estate has been terminated, the Receiver discharged, and the Receivership Estate has ceased to exist as a legal entity.

Dated: February 2, 2016.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Robert E. Feldman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2016-02235 Filed 2-4-16; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
#### BETTIE JOYNER, Administratrix of WILLIAM LEE JOYNER, Deceased, v. ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, TILGHMAN MOTORS, INC., J. W. HARDY, MALCOLM HARDY, and B O. TAYLOR.

(Filed 1 November, 1935.)

Appeal arid Error J d—

Where the Supreme Court is evenly divided in opinion, one Justice not sitting, the judgment of the lower court will be affirmed without becoming a precedent.

Appeal from *Small, J.,*at August Term, 1935, of Pitt.

The defendant St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company demurred to the complaint upon the ground that said complaint failed to *844allege facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against it, tbe insurance company. Tbe court overruled tbe demurrer, and to- tbis order the demurrant excepted and appealed to tbe Supreme Court, assigning error.

Shaw *& Jones for plaintiff, appellee.*

*J. M. Broughton for demurrant, appellant.*

Per Curiam.

Tbe Court being equally divided in opinion, *Brogden, J.,*not sitting, tbe order of tbe Superior Court is affirmed in accordance with, tbe usual practice in such cases, and stands as a decision in tbis case without becoming a precedent. *Nebel v. Nebel,*201 N. C., 840, and cases there cited.

Affirmed.
#### William McGraw and Others, Respondents, v. Israel M. Cohn, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed,' with costs.

All concurred, except Smith, P, J., and Houghton, J., dissenting.
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Retirement Age | Description of Proposed Provision:      Increase the normal retirement age (NRA) from 66 to 67 one year earlier than current law, starting for those reaching age 62 in 2016 and ending for those reaching age 62 in 2021.  Then, after 2021, index the NRA to maintain a constant ratio of expected retirement years (life expectancy at NRA) to potential work years (NRA minus 20). |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2008 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified July 16, 2008 |
EX-10.2




 Exhibit 10.2 

EXECUTION VERSION 
 Primavera Capital Acquisition
Corporation (“SPAC”) 
 41/F Gloucester Tower 

15 Queen’s Road Central 
 Hong Kong 

Primavera Capital Acquisition LLC (the “Sponsor”) 

41/F Gloucester Tower 
 15 Queen’s Road Central 

Hong Kong 
 December 2, 2022 

 

	Re:	 Waiver 



Dear Sirs: 
 Reference is made to certain
Promissory Note, dated January 28, 2022, by and between the Sponsor and SPAC (as may be amended, restated, supplemented or modified from time to time, the “Promissory Note”). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall
have the meaning ascribed to them in the Promissory Note. 
 Pursuant to Section 14 of the Promissory Note, the Sponsor hereby
irrevocably waives, subject to the Closing and effective immediately prior to the consummation of the Initial Merger, its right to receive any payment of the principal balance of the Promissory Note from SPAC. 

This letter shall become effective on the date hereof and shall terminate and be of no further force or effect upon the termination of the
Business Combination Agreement, dated as of March 23, 2022, and as amended on October 17, 2022, October 20, 2022, October 28, 2022 and December 2, 2022 (as may be further amended, restated, modified or varied in accordance
with the terms therein, the “Business Combination Agreement”), by and among SPAC and certain other parties thereto, without the Closing (as defined in the Business Combination Agreement) having taken place. 

Sections 10, 11, 12, 14 and 15 of the Promissory Note are incorporated herein by reference mutatis mutandis; provided that, in each
case, references to “this Note” in such paragraphs shall mean this letter. 
 [Signature Pages Follow] 











 
					
	Very truly yours,
	
	Primavera Capital Acquisition LLC 
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Tong Chen

		 	Name:	 	Tong Chen
		 	Title:	 	Authorized Signatory


 [Signature Page to Waiver Letter] 











 
					
	AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:
	
	Primavera Capital Acquisition Corporation
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Tong Chen

		 	Name:	 	Tong Chen
		 	Title:	 	Director


 [Signature Page to Waiver Letter]
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 244 (Wednesday, December 20, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 65639]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30841]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Yakima Training Center Cultural and Natural Resources Committee 
(Policy Committee)

AGENCY: Headquarters, I Corps and Fort Lewis, Fort Lewis, WA.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (P.L. 92-463) announcement is made of the following 
committee meeting.

NAME OF COMMITTEE: Yakima Training Center Cultural and Natural 
Resources Committee--Policy Committee.

DATE OF MEETING: January 23, 1996.

PLACE: Officers' Club, Fort Lewis, Washington.

TIME: 12:30 p.m.

PROPOSED AGENDA: After action review of Cascade Sage 95 and Cultural 
and Natural Resources Management Plan update. All proceedings are open.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen Hart, Chief, Civil Law, (206) 
967-0793.
Gregory D. Showalter,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-30841 Filed 12-19-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and GraphsUpdated May 3, 2006   |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|

| Cost-of-Living Adjustment | Description of Proposed Provision:      Beginning December 2006, reduce cost-of-living adjustment for OASDI benefits by 1 percentage point |
|---------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                           |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2005 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map |
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                              None
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001059083
<NAME>                        Nationwide Credit, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>               1.000
<CASH>                               5755
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                       12289
<ALLOWANCES>                         1187
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    18078
<PP&E>                              14648                        
<DEPRECIATION>                       5736
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     136474
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               15599
<BONDS>                            100000                        
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                           1537
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       136474 
<SALES>                             27266
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    27266
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    26312
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   3114
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (2160)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (2160)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                       (2160)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0
        


</TABLE>
Year Cost Rate

Income 

Rate

Annual 

Balance

2008 11.20 12.77 1.57 359

2009 11.26 12.90 1.63 369

2010 11.37 12.96 1.59 379

2011 11.53 13.03 1.50 388

2012 11.76 13.12 1.36 395

2013 12.03 13.20 1.17 400

2014 12.32 13.27 0.95 403

2015 12.61 13.33 0.72 404

2016 12.92 13.38 0.46 403

2017 13.24 13.42 0.18 401

2018 13.53 13.45 -0.08 398

2019 13.83 13.46 -0.37 393

2020 14.13 13.48 -0.65 387

2021 14.42 13.49 -0.92 379

2022 14.68 13.50 -1.18 371

2023 14.95 13.51 -1.43 362

2024 15.19 13.52 -1.67 352

2025 15.43 13.53 -1.90 341

2026 15.65 13.54 -2.11 329

2027 15.86 13.54 -2.32 316

2028 16.06 13.55 -2.52 302

2029 16.25 13.55 -2.69 287

2030 16.41 13.55 -2.85 272

2031 16.54 13.55 -2.99 257

2032 16.66 13.55 -3.10 241

2033 16.74 13.55 -3.19 224

2034 16.80 13.55 -3.25 207

2035 16.84 13.54 -3.30 191

2036 16.87 13.53 -3.33 173

2037 16.88 13.53 -3.35 156

2038 16.87 13.52 -3.35 139

2039 16.85 13.51 -3.34 121

2040 16.81 13.50 -3.31 103

2041 16.78 13.49 -3.28 85

2042 16.74 13.48 -3.25 67

2043 16.70 13.48 -3.22 49

2044 16.66 13.47 -3.19 30

2045 16.62 13.46 -3.16 12

2046 16.59 13.46 -3.14 ----

2047 16.57 13.45 -3.12 ----

2048 16.55 13.44 -3.10 ----

2049 16.53 13.44 -3.09 ----

2050 16.52 13.44 -3.08 ----

2051 16.52 13.43 -3.09 ----

2052 16.52 13.43 -3.09 ----

2053 16.53 13.43 -3.10 ----

2054 16.55 13.43 -3.12 ----

2055 16.57 13.43 -3.14 ----

2056 16.59 13.43 -3.16 ----

2057 16.61 13.43 -3.19 ----

2058 16.64 13.43 -3.21 ----

2059 16.66 13.43 -3.24 ----

2060 16.69 13.43 -3.26 ----

2061 16.71 13.43 -3.29 ----

2062 16.74 13.43 -3.31 ----

2063 16.77 13.43 -3.34 ----

2064 16.79 13.43 -3.36 ----

2065 16.82 13.43 -3.39 ----

Detailed Single Year Tables

Category of Change: Taxation of Benefits

Proposed Provision: Tax Social Security benefits in a manner similar to private pension income 

beginning in 2009. Phase out the lower-income thresholds during 2009-2018.

Expressed as a percentage of taxable payrol Trust Fund 

Ratio 

1-1-year
2066 16.85 13.43 -3.42 ----

2067 16.88 13.43 -3.45 ----

2068 16.92 13.43 -3.48 ----

2069 16.95 13.43 -3.52 ----

2070 16.99 13.43 -3.55 ----

2071 17.03 13.44 -3.59 ----

2072 17.06 13.44 -3.63 ----

2073 17.10 13.44 -3.66 ----

2074 17.14 13.44 -3.70 ----

2075 17.18 13.44 -3.74 ----

2076 17.23 13.44 -3.78 ----

2077 17.27 13.45 -3.82 ----

2078 17.31 13.45 -3.86 ----

2079 17.36 13.45 -3.91 ----

2080 17.40 13.45 -3.95 ----

2081 17.45 13.46 -3.99 ----

2082 17.50 13.46 -4.04 ----

2083 17.54 13.46 -4.08 ----

2084 17.59 13.46 -4.12 ----

2085 17.63 13.47 -4.17 ----

Summarized Rates: OASDI

2008 Cost Rate Income Rate

Actuarial 

Balance

-2082 15.63% 14.21% -1.43% 0.27%

Office of the Chief Actuary, Social Security

Estimates based on Intermediate Assumptions of the 2008 Trustees Report

Change in 

Actuarial Balance

July 18, 2008
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 0.59 0.45 16% 10%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

September 15, 2023

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable)

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: E3.5. Increase the taxable maximum each year by an additional 2 percent beginning 

in 2024 until taxable earnings equal 90 percent of covered earnings. Provide benefit credit for earnings up 

to the revised taxable maximum.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-20266 USDC No. CA-H-94-1310

__________________
LEONARD R. CROOMS, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus WAYNE SCOTT, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

--------------------- August 14, 1995 Before GARWOOD, BENAVIDES and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT: Leonard Ray Crooms requests a certificate of probable cause (CPC) to appeal the district court's dismissal of his fourth federal petition for habeas corpus as an abuse of the writ. A second or successive petition may be dismissed if the petitioner alleges new or different grounds and "the failure of the petitioner to assert those grounds in a prior petition constituted an abuse of the writ." Rule 9(b) of the Rules Governing 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Proceedings. We review the district court's decision to dismiss the petition pursuant to Rule 9(b)No. 95-20266 -2-

for an abuse of discretion. Hudson v. Whitley , 979 F.2d 1058, 1062 (5th Cir. 1992). The district court should have given Crooms notice that his petition was being considered for dismissal and that dismissal was automatic if he failed to show why he did not raise the new claims in his previous petitions. See United States v. Cullum , 47 F.3d 763, 764 (5th Cir. 1995)(§ 2255 case). Because it is not certain that Crooms would not be able to allege facts sufficient to prevent his claim from being dismissed under Rule 9(b), the court's error was not harmless. Id. Crooms's request for CPC is GRANTED. Because no further briefing is necessary, the district court's judgment dismissing Crooms's petition is VACATED and the cause REMANDED for further proceedings. See Clark v. Williams , 693 F.2d 381, 381-82 (5th Cir. 1982). Crooms's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) is DENIED as unnecessary.
### Proposed Provision: B3.8. Beginning with those newly eligible for OASDI benefits in 2030, create a new bend point at the 50th percentile of the AIME distribution of newly retired workers and gradually reduce all PIA factors except for the 90 percent factor. By 2063: a) the 32 percent PIA factor below the new bend point reduces to 30 percent; b) the 32 percent PIA factor above the new bend point reduces to 10 percent; and c) the 15 percent PIA factor reduces to 5 percent.
#### Isaac Le Roy, Appellant, v. Patrick McCormick, Respondent.

Motion to strike cause from calendar and for judgment denied, without costs.