alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.18


 


PROMISSORY
NOTE


 





	$250,000.00	November 1, 2022




 


FOR
VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Lipella Pharmaceuticals Inc. (the “Borrower”), promises to pay to the order of Jonathan
Kaufman (the “Lender”), the principal sum of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars and Zero Cents ($250,000.00), with
interest thereon at the rate of eight and three quarters percent (8.75%) per annum, said principal and all accrued interest thereon
being payable in full, without notice or demand, on June 30, 2023.


 


The
Borrower reserves the right of prepaying all or a portion of the principal balance hereof, but only in conjunction with payment
of all accrued interest (calculated on a daily basis) on the amount prepaid through the date of such prepayment, at any time without
penalty. All payments on or in respect of this Note or the indebtedness evidenced hereby shall be made to the Lender without set-off,
counterclaim and free and clear of deductions of any kind.


 


All
persons now or hereafter liable for the principal amount due on this Note or any part hereof do expressly waive presentment for
payment, notice of dishonor, protest and notice of protest and agree that the time for the payment of this Note may be extended
without releasing or otherwise affecting their liability on this Note, or any other security agreements or guarantees, if any,
securing this Note.


 


This
Note was signed at Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania and shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the provisions of the laws
of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Any failure of the Lender or the legal holder hereof to exercise any option herein provided
upon default shall not constitute a waiver of the right to exercise such option in the event of any continuing or subsequent default.
The Borrower hereby agrees that the maturity of all or any part of the indebtedness evidenced hereby may be postponed or extended
without prejudice to its liability on this Note.


 


This
Note will be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Borrower and the Lender and their respective successors and assigns;
provided, however, that the Borrower may not assign this Note in whole or in part without the prior written consent
of Lender.


 


If
any provision of this Note is illegal, or hereafter rendered illegal, or is for any other reason void, voidable or otherwise unenforceable
or invalid, or hereafter rendered void, voidable or otherwise unenforceable or invalid, the remainder of this Note shall not be
affected thereby but shall be construed as if it does not contain such provision.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, and intending to be
legally bound, the Borrower has executed and delivered this Note as of the date first above written.


 


	 	LIPELLA PHARMACEUTICALS
    INC.
	 	 
	 	/s/ Jonathan Kaufman
	 	By: Jonathan Kaufman
	 	Title:
    President
Skip to main content

# Social Security

Search
Menu
Español
Sign in

##  Benefits paid as a percent of personal income

Office of the Chief Actuary Statistical TablesFinancial dataAnnual benefits by trust fund

**Total benefits paid as a percent of personal income,   1937-2023**[Amounts in millions]

CalendaryearTotal benefitsPersonalincome   a/Total benefitsas percent ofpersonal income1937174,710b/19381069,0840.01%19391473,6320.02%19403579,4080.04%19418897,8780.09%1942131126,7240.10%1943166156,1870.11%1944209169,7170.12%1945274175,7860.16%1946378182,5340.21%1947466194,4810.24%1948556213,4960.26%1949667211,0710.32%1950961233,7350.41%19511,885264,2320.71%19522,194282,4600.78%19533,006299,2271.00%19543,670302,2211.21%19554,968324,1591.53%19565,715347,9031.64%19577,404367,9832.01%19588,576378,9532.26%195910,298402,8652.56%196011,245422,1382.66%196112,749440,5762.89%196214,461468,8373.08%196315,427492,7743.13%196416,223528,1933.07%196518,311570,6593.21%196621,070620,3393.40%196725,967665,7233.90%196830,651730,9154.19%196933,371800,3364.17%197038,982865,0454.51%197145,065932,7854.83%197250,2691,024,4564.91%197361,0911,140,7805.36%197470,9961,251,8195.67%197582,6111,369,3896.03%197694,1801,502,6476.27%1977106,4431,659,2366.42%1978117,8941,863,7216.33%1979133,6912,082,7096.42%1980156,2982,324,4586.72%1981184,4502,603,2007.09%1982207,2682,789,4617.43%1983224,5242,981,7167.53%1984238,6823,288,6747.26%1985256,7233,522,8937.29%1986272,6983,731,1937.31%1987284,4873,946,8067.21%1988303,7174,280,0217.10%1989329,1934,621,0127.12%1990356,5364,913,3037.26%1991386,9125,089,9137.60%1992419,3255,417,4947.74%1993449,8965,652,8657.96%1994478,7755,940,9218.06%1995513,9596,283,3598.18%1996544,3506,666,1998.17%1997572,5427,073,9748.09%1998585,1567,588,3587.71%1999595,3267,978,5997.46%2000625,0608,621,2997.25%2001672,8538,993,1437.48%2002714,8049,150,0497.81%2003746,7569,481,7557.88%2004796,07510,015,8737.95%2005850,71710,546,1028.07%2006955,06711,301,9968.45%20071,010,45211,932,1198.47%20081,077,06512,425,6798.67%20091,177,91612,065,6829.76%20101,217,58712,556,6289.70%20111,266,61613,309,5719.52%20121,340,77813,917,7949.63%20131,387,33314,068,7709.86%20141,453,01814,784,0749.83%20151,524,82915,473,7419.85%20161,580,92315,887,6519.95%20171,643,64316,662,7569.86%20181,719,42017,528,1929.81%20191,833,61018,356,2499.99%20202,012,43519,629,02210.25%20211,961,75521,407,6629.16%20222,125,95821,840,7679.73%20232,404,84922,975,69710.47%a Personal income data, from the  Bureau of Economic Analysis, and was obtained on March 4, 2024. This data is subject to revision.b Less than 0.005 percent.

Footer menu
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No. 333-140448 on
Form SB-2 for Manhattan Bancorp and Subsidiary, of our report dated March 26, 2009 with respect to the consolidated statement of financial condition of Manhattan Bancorp and
Subsidiary as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the related consolidated statement of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2008 and the period
August 15, 2007 (Commencement of Business) through December 31, 2007, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Manhattan Bancorp for the year ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007.

/s/
VAVRINEK, TRINE, DAY & CO., LLP
Rancho Cucamonga, California
March 26, 2009

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 11.1



                            Allegiance Telecom, Inc.
                    Computation of per Share Earnings (Loss)
                      Three Months Ended September 30, 1998


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        Number of Shares         Percent Outstanding       Equivalent Shares
                                                        ----------------         -------------------       -----------------
<S>                                                     <C>                      <C>                       <C>
Prior to Initial Public Offering
      1997 Common Stock Offering                                     426                 1.10%                             5

After Initial Public Offering
      1997 Common Stock Offering                                     426                98.91%                           421
      1998 Common Stock Offering                              10,000,000                98.91%                     9,891,304
      Preferred Stock Converted to Common Stock               40,341,128                98.91%                    39,902,637
                                                                                                               ------------- 
                                                                                                                  49,794,368



WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING                                                                               49,794,368

NET LOSS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK                                                                            $(183,892,618)

NET LOSS PER SHARE, BASIC AND DILUTED                                                                                 $(3.69)
                                                                                                               ============= 
</TABLE>
#### J. HOLT GARDNER, JESSE H. GARDNER, MELVIN H. GARDNER, DOUGLAS GARDNER, MRS. R. B. BYRD, MRS. R. A. HOLLAND, MRS. ROBT. WOODRUFF, MRS. R. P. ANDREWS, MRS. CARRIE A. GARDNER, MRS. ALDINE EBERT; Co-Partners, Trading as THE GARDNER COMPANY; WILLIAM McKEITHAN, and MYRTLE WILLIAMS, v. C. J. McDONALD, Sheriff of MOORE COUNTY, and THE BANK OF PINEHURST.

(Filed 5 May, 1943.)

Appeal by defendant Bank of Pinehurst from *Warlick, J.,*at December Term, 1942, of Moore.

Civil action to enjoin sale of land under execution.

These facts present the controversy:

Plaintiffs claim title to land in question by virtue of deed from the sheriff of Moore County pursuant to sale held on 7 November, 1932, under an execution issued out of the Superior Court of said county on 13 August, 1932, upon a judgment of Southern Security and Guaranty Company against E. TI. Scarboro and Percy L. Gardner, and returnable “not less than 40 nor more than 60 days from the date” thereof — the sale having been held after the expiration of 60 days.

Thereafter, on 26 December, 1932, defendant Bank obtained a judgment in the Superior Court of said county against Percy L. Gardner *et al.,*and in September, 1942, had execution issued thereon, pursuant to which the sheriff of Moore County advertised the land in question for sale for the purpose of satisfying the execution.

Thereupon this action was instituted and temporary restraining order issued. Upon hearing, the parties having waived jury trial and agreed *855for court to find tbe facts and to enter judgment thereon, the court found facts of which the above is brief summary, and held as a matter of law that, under the provisions of C. S., 672, as amended by chapter 172, Public Laws 1931, concerning return of executions, the sale on 7 November, 1932, as made under the execution of 13 August, 1932, under which plaintiff claims, is valid. From judgment in accordance therewith, and permanently restraining defendants from selling the property under the execution upon the judgment of 26 December, 1932, defendant Bank appeals to the Supreme Court and assigns error.

*Seawell & Seaiuell for plaintiffs, appellees.*

*W. D. Sabiston, Jr., for defendant Bank of Pinehurst, appellant.*

Pee Cueiam.

One member of the Court, *Schenck, J.,*not sitting, and the remaining six being evenly divided in opinion as to the correctness of the ruling of the court below, the judgment of the Superior Court stands affirmed as the disposition of this appeal, without becoming a precedent, accordant with the usual practice in such eases. *Howard v. Coach Co.,*216 N. C., 799, 4 S. E. (2d), 449; *Elmore v. General Amusements,*221 N. C., 535, 19 S. E. (2d), 5.

Affirmed.
#### The Union Cemetery Association of Westmoreland, Appellant, v. Amos Barnes, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed on the opinion of

Kennedy, J.,

delivered at the circuit.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED

November 14, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 03-30276 Summary Calendar

SHELBA J. GREGG, WIFE OF; FRANK D. GREGG,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

VERSUS

JOHN W. LINDER, II; JAMES O M WOMACK; PATRICK J. BERRIGAN,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Louisiana

Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

A sserting jurisdiction on the basis of diversit y of

citizenship, Frank D. Gregg and his wife, Shelba J. Gregg

(hereinafter “Plaintiffs”) filed this legal malpractice action in

the U.S . District Court against John W. Linder, II; James O M

Womack and Patrick J. Berrigan (hereinafter “Defendants”) who acted

as attorneys of r ecord for Plaintiffs in a civil action filed in

the United States District Court for the Eastern District of

Louisiana. The Defendants filed motions for summary judgment2

arguing that all of the Plaintiffs’legal malpractice claims against

the Defendants were pre-empted under LSA R.S. 9:5605 and should be

dismissed. The district court found that the undisputed facts

demonstrated that the Plaintiffs knew or should have known the

facts forming the basis of their malpractice claims more than one

year prior to the filing of this su it, and therefore the claims

were barred by pre-emption under LSA R.S. 9:5605. Plaintiffs

appeal to this Court.

We have care fully reviewed the briefs, the record excerpts,

and relevant portions of the record itself. For the reasons stated

by the district court in its order and reasons filed under date of

March 11, 2003, we affirm the decision of the district court to

grant summary judgment in favor of Defendants.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO\
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Online Vacation Center Holdings Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Edward B. Rudner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: May 13, 2008


/s/ Edward B. Rudner
--------------------
Edward B. Rudner
Chief Executive Officer
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-1473

___________

Barbara Kaminski, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

Baxter County, Arkansas; John Doe, *

#1-#10, who are or were deputies *

and/or agents of Baxter County *

Sheriff’s Department, in their official *

capacity and in their individual *

capacity, *

*

Appellees. *

*

__________

 Appeals from the United States

No. 98-2056 District Court for the

__________ Western District of Arkansas. 

 [UNPUBLISHED]

Barbara Kaminski, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

Baxter County, Arkansas, *

*

Defendant-Appellee, *

*

John Doe, #1-#10, who are or were *
The Honorable H. Franklin Waters, United States District Judge for the Western 1

District ofArkansas. 

-2-

deputies and/or agents of the Baxter *

County Sheriff&s Department, in *

their official capacity and in their *

individual capacity, *

*

Defendants-Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: October 15, 1998

 Filed: November 2, 1998

___________

Before WOLLMAN, HANSEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Barbara Kaminski appeals the district court&s

1

adverse grant of summary judgment in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action stemming from a

search of her house and the denial of her motion to reconsider. Having reviewed the

record and the parties& briefs, we conclude that the district court did not err.

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
| 1.   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                          |                                                                                         |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|-------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                          | BIOMODA,      INC.                                                                           |
|                          |                                                                                         |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
| Dated:      November 16, 2009 | By:                                                                                | /s/ John J.      Cousins                                       |
|                          | John      J. Cousins                                                                         |
|                          | President      & Chief Financial Officer(Principal      Executive and AccountingOfficer) |
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3331 

To amend the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2021 to improve the semiconductor incentive program 

of the Department of Commerce. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 7, 2021 

Mr. PETERS (for himself, Mr. PORTMAN, Mrs. BLACKBURN, and Mr. KELLY) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To amend the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 to improve 

the semiconductor incentive program of the Department 

of Commerce. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Investing in Domestic 

5 Semiconductor Manufacturing Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3331 IS

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION FOR UPSTREAM MANUFACTURERS. 

2 (a) DEFINITIONS.—Section 9901(2) of the William 

3 M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act 

4 for Fiscal Year 2021 (15 U.S.C. 4651(2)) is amended— 

5 (1) by inserting ‘‘production,’’ before ‘‘or re6 search and development’’; and 

7 (2) by striking ‘‘of semiconductors.’’ and insert8 ing ‘‘of semiconductors, materials used to manufac9 ture semiconductors, or semiconductor manufac10 turing equipment.’’. 

11 (b) SEMICONDUCTOR INCENTIVES.—Section 9902(a) 

12 of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Au13 thorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (15 U.S.C. 4652(a)) 

14 is amended— 

15 (1) in paragraph (1)— 

16 (A) by striking ‘‘for semiconductor fabrica17 tion’’ and inserting ‘‘for the fabrication’’; 

18 (B) by inserting ‘‘production,’’ before ‘‘or 

19 research and development’’; and 

20 (C) by striking the period at the end and 

21 inserting ‘‘of semiconductors, materials used to 

22 manufacture semiconductors, or semiconductor 

23 manufacturing equipment.’’; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3331 IS

1 (2) in paragraph (4)(A), by striking ‘‘used for 

2 semiconductors’’ and inserting ‘‘used for the pur3 poses’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 244 (Wednesday, December 20, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 65515]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30940]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

[Notice 1995-24]

11 CFR Part 110


Communications Disclaimer Requirements

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; announcement of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On Oct. 5, 1995 (60 FR 52069), the Commission published the 
text of revised regulations governing disclaimers on campaign 
communications. On Nov. 29, 1995, the Commission published a correction 
to the preamble of the revised regulations. (60 FR 61199) 11 CFR Part 
110. These regulations implement a provision of the Federal Election 
Campaign Act of 1971, as amended. The Commission announces that these 
rules are effective as of December 20, 1995.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 20, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. Susan E. Propper, Assistant General Counsel, or Ms. Rita A. Reimer, 
999 E Street NW., Washington, DC 20463, (202) 219-3690 or toll free 
(800) 424-9530.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 438(d) of Title 2, United States 
Code, requires that any rule or regulation prescribed by the Commission 
to implement Title 2 of the United States Code be transmitted to the 
Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President of the Senate 
thirty legislative days prior to final promulgation. The revisions to 
11 CFR Part 110 were transmitted to Congress on Oct. 2, 1995. Thirty 
legislative days expired in the Senate on Nov. 28, 1995, and in the 
House of Representatives on Dec. 5, 1995.
    The Commission subsequently published a corrections notice to the 
preamble of these rules. The Speaker of the House of Representatives 
and the President of the Senate were notified of the correction notice 
on Nov. 27, 1995. The correction did not affect the text of the rules.
    The rules address the circumstances under which a disclaimer must 
be included on campaign communications, as well as what information 
must be included in the disclaimer. The correction notice deleted a 
potentially misleading reference to phone bank activity that had 
inadvertently been included in the Explanation and Justification to the 
revised rules.
    Announcement of Effective Date: 11 CFR 110.11, as published at 60 
FR 52069, is effective as of December 20, 1995.

    Dated: December 15, 1995.
Lee Ann Elliot,
Vice Chairman, Federal Election Commission.
[FR Doc. 95-30940 Filed 12-19-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3319 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

155 Main Avenue West in Winsted, Minnesota, as the ‘‘James A. Rogers 

Jr. Post Office’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 7, 2021 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Ms. SMITH) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 155 Main Avenue West in Winsted, Minnesota, 

as the ‘‘James A. Rogers Jr. Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JAMES A. ROGERS JR. POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 155 Main Avenue West in 

6 Winsted, Minnesota, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘James A. Rogers Jr. Post Office’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3319 IS

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘James A. Rogers Jr. 

3 Post Office’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS