alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### DANIEL MASON v. R. M. BRAWLEY, JR.

(Filed 8 June, 1940.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *Olive, Special Judge,*at November Term, 1939, of Guileobd.

Affirmed.

*James E. Oolirane and W. Henry Hunter for plaintiff.*

*Zeb V. Turlington and John W. Cajfey for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

At the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence, motion for judgment of nonsuit was allowed. An examination of tbe evidence offered by tbe plaintiff leads us to tbe conclusion that tbe plaintiff has failed to offer any substantial evidence of actionable negligence upon tbe part of tbe defendant. Plaintiff was struck while be was attempting to cross tbe highway in front of defendant’s motor vehicle. Tbe judgment of nonsuit is

Affirmed.
Skip to main content

# Social Security

Search
Menu
Español
Sign in

## Types of Beneficiaries

Office of the Chief Actuary 

Beneficiary data

The following briefly describes the different    types of beneficiaries paid by Social Security.  The descriptions are not    meant to be definitive.  Check with a local Social Security office if    you believe you may be eligible for benefits.

We pay benefits to the following types of beneficiaries.

Retired worker and auxiliary beneficiaries
      Payment for these benefits is made from the Old-Age      and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund.

- Retired worker—beneficiary who worked in covered employment    long enough to be  insured  and who is at    least 62 years old (benefits equal to the      "primary insurance    amount"  are payable at the  normal     retirement age ; maximum benefits are payable at age 70) 
- Spouse of retired worker —must     either (1) have a child under age 16 or    a disabled child in his or her care,  or  (2)     be at least 62 years old; applies also to divorced spouse     if the marriage lasted at least 10 years  
- Child  of retired worker—see 3 types of child benefits below 

Survivor beneficiaries
      Payment for these benefits is also made from the      Old-Age       and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund.

- Child  of deceased worker—see 3 types of child benefits below 
- Aged widow(er)—must be at least 60 years old 
- Young widow(er)—must have a child under age 16 or     a disabled child in his or her care 
- Disabled widow(er)—must be disabled and be at least 50 years old      (converted to aged widow(er) upon attainment of age 65) 
- Parent of deceased worker—must have been dependent on worker and     be at least 62 years old 

Disabled worker and auxiliary beneficiaries
     Benefits are paid from the Disability Insurance Trust Fund.     

- Disabled worker—beneficiary who worked in covered employment      long enough to be insured and who had been working recently in covered      employment prior to disability onset 
- Spouse of disabled worker—must either (1) have a child under age 16      or a disabled child in his or her care,  or  (2)       be at least 62 years old; applies      also to divorced spouse if the marriage lasted at least 10 years 
- Child  of disabled worker—see 3 types of child benefits below 

   Types of child beneficiaries:     - Minor child (under age 18)       Adult disabled before the age of 22      High school student under age 19      
Footer menu
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 40 274 Summary Calendar

BRIAN N. NELSON , Plaintiff

- Appellant

v. RORY L. GRIFFIN, Deputy Director for Health and Correctional Service; J. SHAH, Doctor, Bowie County Correction Center; BOB PAGE, Warden, Bowie Country Correction Center; REGINA LYNCH, Head RN, Bowie County Correctional Center , Defendant s
- Appellee s

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 5 :1 6

- CV

- 49

Before DAVIS, HAYNES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
Brian N. Nelson, Arkansas prisoner # 148443 , appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil suit after it granted the defendants’ summary judgment motions

. In his complaint, Nelson alleged that the defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs because

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set f orth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 12, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-40274 Document: 00515032254 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/12/2019No. 18

- 40 274

2 th ey ignored many of his sick call requests and failed to provide adequate diagnostic tools or treatment for a back injury he received while being transported to his temporary housing in the Bowie County Correctional Center. We review de novo a district cou rt’s grant of summary judgment. Nickell v. Beau View of Biloxi, L.L.C. , 636 F.3d 752, 754 (5th Cir. 2011). Regarding his deliberate indifference claim s , Nelson can not establish that prison officials “refused to treat him, ignored his complaints, intentionally treated him incorrectly, or engaged in any similar conduct that would clearly evince a wanton disregard for any serious medical needs.” Domino v. Texas Dep’t of Crim. Justice , 239 F.3d 752, 756 (5th Cir. 2001) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Nelson’s mere disagreement with the course of his medical treatment and his insistence that he should have received further treatment are not sufficient t o support a claim of deliberate indifference. See Gobert v. Caldwell , 463 F.3d 339, 346 (5th Cir. 2006) ; Domino , 239 F.3d at 756

. Furthermore, Nelson does not challenge the district court’s conclusion that he failed to rebut the applicability of qualifie d immunity. He has, thus,
abandoned any challenge to the district court’s alternate basis for the grant of summary judgment. See T urner v. Quarterman , 481 F.3d 292, 295 & n.1 (5th Cir. 2007); Brinkmann v. Dallas Cnty. Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Nelson’s motion for the appointment of counsel is DENIED. See Ulmer v. Chancellor , 691 F.2d 209, 212

- 13 (5th Cir. 1982). Case: 18-40274 Document: 00515032254 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/12/2019
### Proposed Provision: E2.16. Apply OASDI 12.4 percent payroll tax rate on earnings above $250,000 starting in 2024, and tax all earnings once the current-law taxable maximum exceeds $250,000. Increase the computed level of the SSA average wage index for years after 2023 by amounts ranging from 0.6 percent for 2024 to 0.9 percent for 2034 and later.  Provide benefit credit for earnings above the current-law taxable maximum that are subject to the payroll tax, using a secondary PIA formula. This secondary PIA formula involves: (1) an "AIME+" derived from annual earnings from each year after 2023 that were in excess of that year's current-law taxable maximum; and (2) a formula factor of 2 percent on this newly computed "AIME+".

back
734 A.2d 788

#### THOMAS CORSIE AND LYNN CORSIE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. MICHAEL CAMPANALONGA, ETC., DEFENDANT, AND JAMES F. JOHNSON, ETC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-MOVANTS.

May 4, 1999.

This matter having been presented to the Court on the motion of defendants for leave to appeal from a decision of the Appellate Division, reported at 317 *N.J.Super.*177, 721 A.2d 733 (1998), that requires the production of certain documents maintained by defendants for an *in camera*inspection by the trial court;

And the parties having informed the Court during the pendency of the motion that the only issue that remains unresolved is the inspection of a single document, a memorandum dated May 22, 1991;

And defendants having submitted to the Court a certification that the document at issue is a memorandum that memorializes oral communications between defendant Campanalonga and the Vicar for Priests in the Vicar’s role as spiritual advisor to Cam-panalonga;

And it appearing that plaintiffs Thomas and Lynn Corsie do not dispute the nature of the document at issue;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that defendants’ motion for leave to appeal is granted, limited solely to the issue of the trial court’s inspection of the memorandum by the Vicar for Priests dated May 22,1991, and the portion of the decision of the Appellate Division that relates to said document is summarily reversed; and it is further

ORDERED that all other relief sought by defendants on leave to appeal is denied.
EXHIBIT 31.1
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION
President and Chief Executive Officer
I, John J. Limbert, certify that:
 1  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CSB Bancorp, Inc.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this annual report is being prepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’ internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
 b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
Date: March 24, 2005    /s/ John J. Limbert   John J. Limbert President and Chief Executive Officer
21
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 4 (Friday, January 6, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 2097]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-323]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. ER95-309-000]


Appalachian Power Company; Notice of Filing

December 30, 1994.
    Take notice that on December 21, 1994, Appalachian Power Company 
(APCo), tendered for filing with the Commission new Electric Service 
Agreements that were executed on December 1, 1994, by APCo and its 
following wholesale customers.

a. Black Diamond Power Company--East Hartland
b. Black Diamond Power Company--Elkhurst
c. Black Diamond Power Company--Sophia
d. Elk Power Company--Clay
e. Elk Power Company--Reed's Fork
f. Elkhom Public Service Company--Crozier #4
g. Elkhom Public Service Company--Elkhom
h. Kimball Light & Water Company
i. Union Power Company--Mullens
j. Union Power Company--Pierpont
k. Union Power Company--Rhodell
l. United Light & Power Company
m. War Light & Power Company

    The agreements are intended to replace the existing service 
agreements between APCo and the companies listed above, which expired 
on November 30, 1994.
    APCo proposes an effective date of December 1, 1994, and states 
that a copy of its filing was served on the affected customers and the 
Public Service Commission of West Virginia.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before January 13, 1995. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-323 Filed 1-5-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>1

<S>                                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       285,953
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                42,538
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             435,062
<PP&E>                                       140,717
<DEPRECIATION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,029,484
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        247,765
<BONDS>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                     11,588
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,473,010
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,029,484
<SALES>                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             0
<CGS>                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             757,917
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           19,618
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (777,535)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (777,535)
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                (777,535)
<EPS-BASIC>                               (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (.07)



</TABLE>
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 0.89 1.80 25% 41%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

August 1, 2023

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Retirement Age

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: C2.4. Starting for those age 62 in 2024, increase both the normal retirement age 

(NRA) and the earliest eligibility age (EEA) by 36/47 of a month per year until the NRA and EEA reach 70 

and 65 respectively. For each year, the computed NRA and EEA round down to the next lower full month.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondents, v. Joseph Groblenski, Appellant.

Conviction reversed and new trial granted.

Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLAR

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,843
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,448
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (321)
<INVENTORY>                                     11,602
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                52,427
<PP&E>                                         109,214
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (45,464)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 164,410
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,458
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                      98,115
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   164,410
<SALES>                                        197,456
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               197,456
<CGS>                                          124,718
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  124,718
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,653
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   109
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 911
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,328<F1>
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,356
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,972
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.72
<FN>
<F1>Income-Pretax includes two one-time write-offs
totaling 13,478.
</FN>




</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Pacific Copper Corp. (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:



The annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2010 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirement of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:   February 15, 2011





|"Andrew Brodkey"                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|Andrew Brodkey, CEO                              
|(Chief Executive Officer of Pacific Copper Corp.)



Dated:  February 15, 2011





|"Rakesh Malhotra"                                
|-------------------------------------------------
|Rakesh Malhotra, Chief Financial Officer         
|(Chief Financial Officer of Pacific Copper Corp.)



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Pacific Copper Corp. and will be retained by Pacific Copper Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of Foreign Assets Control

# AGENCY:

Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing updated information for one individual whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 13712, “Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Burundi,” and whose name has been added to OFAC's list of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons (SDN List).

# DATES:

OFAC's action described in this notice was effective February 3, 2016.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control: Assistant Director for Licensing, tel.: 202-622-2480, Assistant Director for Regulatory Affairs, tel.: 202-622-4855, Assistant Director for Sanctions Compliance & Evaluation, tel.: 202-622-2490; or the Department of the Treasury's Office of the Chief Counsel (Foreign Assets Control), Office of the General Counsel, tel.: 202-622-2410.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Electronic and Facsimile Availability

                    The SDN List and additional information concerning OFAC sanctions programs are available from OFAC's Web site (                    *www.treasury.gov/​ofac*). Certain general information pertaining to OFAC's sanctions programs is also available via facsimile through a 24-hour fax-on-demand service, tel.: 202/-622-0077.                

## Notice of OFAC Actions

On February 3, 2016, OFAC updated the identifying information for one individual whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to E.O. 13712. The updated identifying information for the individual is as follows:

NIYONZIMA, Joseph (a.k.a. NIJONZIMA, Joseph; a.k.a. NIYONZIMA, Mathias; a.k.a. NIYONZIMA, Salvator; a.k.a. “Kazungu”); DOB 02 Jan 1967; alt. DOB 06 Mar 1956; POB Kanyosha Commune, Mubimbi, Bujumbura-Rural Province, Burundi (individual) [BURUNDI].

Dated: February 3, 2016.

John E. Smith,

Acting Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control.

[FR Doc. 2016-02371 Filed 2-5-16; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P