alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Cite as Conley v. Conley , 2013-Ohio-4309.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO

LISA M. CONLEY, : MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff-Appellant, : CASE NO. 2013-L-074 - vs - : SEAN CONLEY, : Defendant-Appellee. :

Civil Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Domestic Relations Division, Case No. 10 DR 788. Judgment: Appeal dismissed.

Thomas A. McCormack , McCormack Family Law, 1915 The Superior Building, 815 Superior Avenue, East, Cleveland, OH 44114 (For Plaintiff-Appellant). Linda D. Cooper , Cooper & Forbes, 166 Main Str eet, Painesville, OH 44077-3403 (For Defendant-Appellee).

COLLEEN MARY O’TOOLE, J. {¶1} On August 8, 2013, appellant, Lisa M. Conley, by and through counsel, filed a notice of appeal from a July 8, 2013 entry of the Lake County Court of Common Pleas, Domestic Relations Division. The notice of appeal was due on July 7, 2013, which was not a holiday or a weekend. {¶2} App.R. 4(A) states that: {¶3} “A party shall file the notice of appeal required by App.R. 3 within thirty days of the later of entry of the judgment or order appealed or, in a civil case, service of2 the notice of judgment and its entry if service is not made on the party within the three day rule period in Rule 58(B) of the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure.” {¶4} Loc.R. 3(D)(2) of the Eleventh District Court of Appeals provides: {¶5} In the filing of a Notice of Appeal in civil cases in which the trial court clerk has not complied with Ohio Civ.R. 58(B), and the Notice of Appeal is deemed to be filed out of rule , appellant shall attach an affidavit from the trial court clerk stating that service was not perfected pursuant to Ohio App.R. 4(A). The clerk shall then perfect service and furnish this court with a copy of the appearance

docket in which date of service has been noted. Lack of compliance shall result in the sua sponte dismissal of the appeal under Ohio App.R. 4(A). (Emphasis sic.) {¶6} Here, appellant has not complied with the 30-day rule set forth in App.R. 4(A) nor alleged that there was a failure by the trial court clerk to comply with Civ.R. 58(B). Appellant has not submitted an affidavit from the trial court clerk pursuant to Loc.R. 3(D)(2). The time requirement is jurisdictional in nature and may not be enlarged by an appellate court. State ex rel. Pendell v. Adams Cty. Bd. of Elections , 40 Ohio St.3d 58, 60 (1988); see also App.R. 14(B). {¶7} Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, pursuant to App.R. 4(A).

CYNTHIA WESTCOTT RICE, J., THOMAS R. WRIGHT, J.,

concur.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Certification of Chief Executive Officer  I, Benjamin C. Croxton, certify that:  1.   I have reviewed this amended quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of World Energy Solutions, Inc.;  2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material  fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.   The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:   (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information  relating  to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;   (c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and   (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  4.   The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):    (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation  of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely  affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and   (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Date:  November 6, 2008  WORLD ENERGY SOLUTIONS, INC.  /s/Benjamin C. Croxton BENJAMIN C. CROXTON Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer
## Detailed Single Year Tables

- Individual Provisions
- Retirement Age

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						C1.3: Starting for those age 62 in 2024, index the normal retirement age (NRA) to maintain a constant ratio of expected retirement years (life expectancy at NRA) to potential work years (NRA minus 20). We assume the NRA will increase 1 month every 2 years.**

### Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program

### Summarized Estimates
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7480

JOSE PEREZ-CARRERA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

M. PETTIFORD, Warden of FCI-Bennettsville,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.

(3:06-cv-02044-TLW)

Submitted: February 28, 2008 Decided: March 6, 2008

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jose Perez-Carrera, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens,

Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Jose Perez-Carrera, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the

magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000)

petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Perez-Carrera v. Pettiford, 3:06-cv-02044-TLW

(D.S.C. Aug. 21, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 23 (Thursday, February 4, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 6055]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02145]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL WOMEN'S BUSINESS COUNCIL


Quarterly Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Women's Business Council.

ACTION: Notice of open public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: The Public Meeting will be held on Monday, March 7th, 2016 from 
3:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. EST.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in Washington, DC. Location details 
will be provided upon RSVP, as will information about teleconferencing 
and livestream options.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), the U.S. Small Business 
Administration (SBA) announces the meeting of the National Women's 
Business Council. The National Women's Business Council is tasked with 
providing policy recommendations on issues of importance and impact to 
women entrepreneurs to the SBA, Congress, and the White House.
    This meeting is the 2nd quarterly meeting of the Council for Fiscal 
Year 2016. The program will include remarks from the Council Chair, 
Carla Harris; an update from each of the NWBC committees; and a 
discussion of the Council's FY2016 agenda. The discussion will focus on 
the policy recommendations that the Council will be making to the SBA, 
Congress, and the White House for improving the business climate for 
women entrepreneurs, as well as the new research portfolio. Time will 
be reserved at the end for audience participants to address Council 
Members directly with questions, comments, or feedback. Additional 
speakers will be promoted upon confirmation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The meeting is open to the public 
however advance notice of attendance is requested. To RSVP and confirm 
attendance, the general public should email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e68f888089a688918485c8818990"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="771e191118371900151459101801">[email protected]</span></a> with subject 
line--``RSVP for 03/07 Public Meeting.'' Anyone wishing to make a 
presentation to the NWBC at this meeting must either email their 
interest to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#20494e464f604e5742430e474f56"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="026b6c646d426c7560612c656d74">[email protected]</span></a> or call the main office number at 202-205-
3850.
    For more information, please visit the National Women's Business 
Council Web site at www.nwbc.gov.

    Dated: January 29, 2016.
Miguel J. L'Heureux,
SBA Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016-02145 Filed 2-3-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains notices of meetings published under

the ‘‘Government in the Sunshine Act’’ (Pub.

L. 94-409) 5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3).

Sunshine Act Meetings Federal Register

65731

Vol. 60, No. 244

Wednesday, December 20, 1995

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY

COMMISSION

‘‘FEDERAL REGISTER’’ CITATION OF

PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: December 07,

1995, 60 FR 63571.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF

MEETING: 10:00 a.m., December 13, 1995.

CHANGE IN THE MEETING: The following

Docket Number has been added on the

Agenda scheduled for December 13,

1995:

Item No., Docket No., and Company

CAE–6

ER95–1295–000, Market Responsive

Energy, Inc.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–31044 Filed 12–18–95; 2:09 pm]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M
Skip to main content

# Social Security

Search
Menu
Español
Sign in

## Financial Data

Office of the Chief Actuary 

Beneficiary data

Trust fund data

Trust fund FAQs

The Department of the Treasury manages the trust funds      and provides the Social Security Administration      with monthly data on financial operations of the trust funds and on       investment data.  Social Security has two trust funds: the      Old-Age and Survivors Insurance     (OASI) Trust Fund and the      Disability Insurance (DI) Trust Fund.     

**Income & cost data**       An explanation of the components        of income and cost may help you better understand the data.      - Financial operations            for a selected time period
- Time series 	   for a selected component of the financial operations
-  Graph shows the  growth of the trust funds  since 1987
- Employment taxes —technical report on the largest         income component 
- Benefit payments —technical report on the largest         cost component 

**Investment data**       The trust funds are invested in Federal government securities.      - Investments held  at end of month,           for  months after 1989
- Investment transactions ,           for  years after 1989
- Interest rate  information (includes          rates earned on new          investments )

Footer menu
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 16, 2022.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, May 16, 2022

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A22D0351. ANITRA FREEMAN v. MAURICE HUGHES.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2020CV343985
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration StatementsNo. 333-14363, 333-19141, 333-24329, 333-35701, 333-81783, 333-92711, 333-48376,333-09090, 333-09092, 333-11036, 333-68218, 333-101048, 333-100730, 333-100729,333-130804 and 333-130807, on Form S-8 and in Registration Statement No. 333-91449on Form S-3 of our reports dated March 16, 2006, relating to thefinancial statements and financial statement schedule of Dendrite InternationalInc. and Management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K ofDendrite International, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005.

 
| /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP |   |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                               |   |
| Parsippany, New Jersey             |   |
| March 16, 2006                     |   |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I,  Craig A. Fielding, as the Chief Executive Officer of Consorteum Holdings, Inc., certify that (i) Amendment Number 2 to the Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in Amendment Number 2 to the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Consorteum Holdings, Inc.








/s/ Craig A. Fielding


Craig A. Fielding, President and Chief Executive Officer


March 24, 2011
#### LETITIA B. RAMSEY v. FEDERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.

(Filed 20 March, 1935.)

Appeal from *WarlicJc, J.,*at October Term, 1934, of YaNcey.

Affirmed.

This was an action brought by the plaintiff on a policy of insurance containing a provision to the effect that in case of total and permanent disability the defendant would pay to the insured one per centum of the face amount of said policy, $1,000, each month during the continuance of her disability, *i. e.,*$10.00 per month. The plaintiff alleges that she was totally and permanently disabled from 27 January, 1932, until 27 August, 1934, and that she was therefore entitled to recover $310.00, plus $22.05 interest, or a total of $332.05.

The court submitted the following issues:

“1. From 27 January, 1932, until 27 August, 1934, has the plaintiff been totally and permanently disabled, within the meaning of the policy sued on and introduced in evidence as plaintiff’s Exhibit 1, and by reason of said total and permanent disability has plaintiff necessarily been prevented from engaging in any occupation whatsoever for remuneration or profit?

“2. What sum, if anything, is plaintiff entitled to recover?”

The jury answered the first issue “Yes,” and the second, “$310.00, and interest.” Whereupon, the court signed judgment for the sum of $332.05, from which the defendant appealed to the Supreme Court, assigning errors.

*Chas. Hutchins and Watson & Pouts for plaintiff, appellee.*

*Parker, Bernard & BuBose for defendant, appellant.*

*820Pee Oubiam.

Since the charge of the court is not contained in the record, it is presumed to be free from error. The assignments of error based upon the court’s refusal to grant the defendant’s motion to dismiss the action as of nonsuit cannot be sustained, since the evidence was ample to support the verdict.

The evidence to the effect that the plaintiff had undergone an operation in the year 1931, prior to the disability alleged in the complaint which the defendant makes the basis of certain exceptive assignments of error, was clearly competent for the purposes for which it was admitted, namely, to corroborate the witnesses who had testified that this plaintiff was sick, and to aid the jury in determining whether the plaintiff was totally and permanently disabled at the later time. The assignments of error based upon the ruling of the court that the witness I. N. McLean was a medical expert and permitting him to give an opinion as to the physical condition of the plaintiff are untenable, as the finding of the court that the witness was an expert, since it was based upon sufficient evidence, is conclusive.

This case presents no novel proposition of law and no good purpose can be served by further or more detailed discussion of the assignments of error.

Affirmed.
## Summary Measures and Graphs

- Individual Provisions
- Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable)

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						E3.17: Beginning in 2025, increase the taxable maximum by twice the rate of increase in the national Average Wage Index, but never by less than 3 percent. Provide benefit credit for earnings up to the revised taxable maximum levels.**

|  |  |
|--|--|
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 1.00 1.72 28% 40%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

September 15, 2023

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Level of Monthly Benefits

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: B3.16. For retired worker and disabled worker beneficiaries becoming initially eligible 

in January 2030 or later, phase in a new benefit formula (from 2030 to 2039). Replace the existing two 

primary insurance amount (PIA) bend points with three new bend points as follows: (1) 25% AWI/12 from 

2 years prior to initial eligibility; (2) 100% AWI/12 from 2 years prior to initial eligibility; and (3) 125% AWI/12 

from 2 years prior to initial eligibility. The new PIA factors are 95%, 27.5%, 5% and 2%. During the phase 

in, those becoming newly eligible for benefits will receive an increasing portion of their benefits based on 

the new formula, reaching 100% of the new formula in 2039.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision
EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

Name of Entity

State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or OrganizationMultilink Technology Corporation Israel Ltd.

IsraelMultilink Technology GmbH

GermanyVitesse International Holdings, SRL

BarbadosVitesse International, Inc.

BarbadosVitesse Manufacturing & Development Corporation

DelawareVitesse Semiconductor Canada Corporation

CanadaVitesse Semiconductor Corporation A/S

DenmarkVitesse Semiconductor GmbH & Co. KG

GermanyVitesse Semiconductor Japan Corporation

JapanVitesse Semiconductor Deutschland GmbH

GermanyVitesse Semiconductor Sales Corporation

DelawareVitesse Semiconductor (India) PVT Ltd

IndiaVitesse Semiconductor Beteilig & Verw.GmbH

Germany


---



QuickLinks
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Remote Knowledge, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Ricardo A.
Gijon, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge and belief,
that:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
November 19, 2008





/s/
      Ricardo A. GijonRicardo
      A. GijonActing
      Chief Accounting Officer(Principal
      Accounting
Officer)
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3343 

To provide a civil remedy for an individual whose rights have been violated 

by a person acting under Federal authority, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 8, 2021 

Mr. WHITEHOUSE (for himself, Mr. PADILLA, Mr. MARKEY, and Mr. WYDEN) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide a civil remedy for an individual whose rights 

have been violated by a person acting under Federal 

authority, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bivens Act of 2021’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3343 IS

1 SEC. 2. CIVIL ACTION AGAINST PERSON ACTING UNDER 

2 FEDERAL AUTHORITY. 

3 Section 1979 of the Revised Statutes (42 U.S.C. 

4 1983) is amended by inserting ‘‘of the United States or’’ 

5 before ‘‘of any State’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of KKR Financial Holdings LLC (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), William C. Sonneborn, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Jeffrey B. Van
Horn, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



March 1,
2010

/s/ WILLIAM C. SONNEBORN William C. Sonneborn Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ JEFFREY B. VAN HORN Jeffrey B. Van Horn Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)




---



QuickLinks