alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-10565

Summary Calendar

RODNEY LEE WOODS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JOEL V. YOUNG; SHAFFER, Dr.; JOHN DOE,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Northern District of Texas

(1:95-CV-152-BA)

March 19, 1998

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Rodney Lee Woods, Texas Prisoner # 627825, appeals from the

grant of summary judgment against him on his § 1983 action. Woods

claimed that prison officials were deliberately indifferent to his

serious medical needs and inf licted cruel and unusual punishment

upon him. He contended that his rights were violated when prison

officials assigned him to work in a field squad d espite his back

condition, which he argues prison doctors misdiagnosed.2

The magistrate judge initially dismissed without prejudice

Woods’ claims against Young, a warden of Woods’ pris on, because

Woods had failed to allege Young ’s personal involvement, and we

affirmed that dismissal. In this appeal, Woods contends that the

magistrate erred in failing to reassess Woods’ claim against Young

in light of Woods’ amended complaint. Yet Woods does not set forth

to us the natur e of Young’s personal involvement. Accordingly,

Woods has abandoned this claim on app eal. See Yohey v. Collins

,

985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993).

Woods also complains that the magistrate judge improperly

dismissed his official-capacity cla ims against Young on Eleventh

Amendment grounds. Yet it is well settled that Woods can not evade

a state’s Eleventh Amendment immunity by suing state employees in

their official capacity. S ee G reen v. State Bar of Texas

, 27 F.3d

1083, 1087 (5th Cir. 1994).

Finally, Woods contends t hat the magistrate judge erred in

granting summary judgment in favor of Dr. Shaffer on Woods’ claims

against Shaffer in his individual capacity. Yet Woods must allege

that Shaffer was deliberately indifferent to his se rious medical

needs. S ee Wilson v. Seiter

, 501 U.S. 294, 297, 302-05 (1991). At

best, Woods has alleged a cause of action for negligence, which

does not by itself give rise t o a § 1983 claim. S ee Varnado v.

Lynaugh , 920 F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir. 1991).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I,
Gregory Paul Byrne, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB of Dunn Mining Inc., for the fiscal year ended August 31,
2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of  Dunn Mining Inc.





Date:
September 10, 2008





/s/ Gregory Paul
Byrne


Gregory
Paul Byrne


President,
C.E.O. and Director


(Principal
Executive Officer)
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

127996 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 127996 

 COA: 256795 

Saginaw CC: 81-001266-FY 

DONALD OWENS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 18, 2004 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s 

motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G). 

p1024 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2005 

Clerk
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-0216

_____________________________

MANUEL B. AYALA, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

James M. Colaw, Judge.

February 26, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

OSTERHAUS, C.J., and RAY and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Tyler K. Payne, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Exhibit 15.1

|                                                         |  |                                                                                                                                                                                    
|-------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO                                                    
|Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm |  | Raymond Chabot Grant Thornton LLP Suite
2000 National Bank Tower 600 De La Gauchetière Street
West Montréal, Quebec H3B 4L8 
Telephone: 514-878-2691 Fax: 514-878-2127
www.rcgt.com



We have issued our reports dated March 11, 2014,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting in the Annual Report of Intertape Polymer Group Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2013.

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Intertape Polymer  Group  Inc. on
Forms S-8 (File No. 333-67732; File No. 333-97961; File No. 333-108077; File No. 333-114954; File No. 3333-89763; File No. 333-114960; File No. 333-135599; and File No. 333-184797).



LOGO

Montreal, Canada

March 20, 2014









|1 | CPA auditor, CA, public accountancy permit No. A120795
|- | ------------------------------------------------------



















Member of Grant Thornton International Ltd
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 22 (Wednesday, February 3, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 5791]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-01899]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Office of the Secretary


Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB 
Review; Comment Request; Placement Verification and Follow Up of Job 
Corps Participants; Correction

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Labor published a document in the Federal 
Register of December 24, 2015, inviting public comments on the 
Placement Verification and Follow Up of Job Corps Participants 
Information Collection Request (80 FR 80389). The document contained an 
incorrect date.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Contact Michel Smyth by telephone at 
202-693-4129 (this is not a toll-free number) or by email to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d2969d9e8d8280938d8287909e9b9192b6bdbefcb5bda4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9fdbd0d3c0cfcddec0cfcaddd3d6dcdffbf0f3b1f8f0e9">[email protected]</span></a>.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of December 24, 2015, in FR Doc. 2015-
32377, on page 80389, (80 FR 80389) in the second column, correct the 
DATES caption to read:

DATES: The OMB will consider all written comments that agency receives 
on or before January 29, 2016.

    Dated: January 20, 2016.
Michel Smyth,
Departmental Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016-01899 Filed 2-2-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4510-FT-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

TheBoard of Directors

ClaytonWilliams Energy, Inc. and subsidiaries:

 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-68320, 33-68318, 33-68316,33-69688, and 33-92834) and on Form S-3 (No. 333-116825) of Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. andsubsidiaries of our report dated March 15, 2006 with respect to theconsolidated balance sheets of ClaytonWilliams Energy, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period endedDecember 31, 2005,  and all relatedfinancial statement schedules, management’s assessment of the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, whichreports appear in the December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K ofClayton Williams Energy, Inc. and subsidiaries. Our report dated March 15, 2006, refers to a change in the Company’s method of accounting for abandonmentobligations in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting StandardsNo. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations”, effectiveJanuary 1, 2003.

 

 
| /s/ KPMG LLP   |   |
|----------------|--------|
|           |
|           |
| Dallas, Texas  |
| March 16, 2006 |

 

----
<PAGE>
 
                                 EXHIBIT 11.1
                   
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                      GEORGIA BANK FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                                AND SUBSIDIARY


<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                                      YEAR ENDED    
                                                                      DECEMBER 31,  
                                                      ------------    -----------   ------------
                                                         1998             1997         1996
                                                      ------------    -----------   ------------
<S>                                                    <C>            <C>           <C>    
Net income available to common shareholders            $2,915,384      $2,354,925    $1,952,165
                                                                                   
Earnings per common share:                                                         
    Weighted average number of common                                              
       shares outstanding                               1,820,368       1,588,828     1,542,368
                                                                                   
Net income per common share                            $     1.60      $     1.48    $     1.27
</TABLE>

                                      79
1 The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United St ates District Judge for the Western District of Missouri, adopting the re port and recommendations of the Honorable William A. Knox, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ Nos. 08-1435/1826

___________ Larry Jackson, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeals from the United States * District Court for the Steve Long; Dave Dormire; Cornell, * Western District of Missouri. Acting FUM; Dave Corum, Lt.; * Dittman, CCA, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: January 6, 2009 Filed: January 20, 2009

___________ Before SMITH, HANSEN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Larry Jackson appeals the district court’s 1 orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, denying him leave to appeal in forma pauperis (IFP), and denying him appointment of counsel to pursue this appeal. We grant his pending motion to proceed IFP in this court, but note that th e district court has already assessed and is-2- collecting the appellate filing fee, so no further assessment is necessary. We affirm the district court’s orders for the reasons given by the court, see 8th Cir. R. 47A(a), and we deny Jackson’s pending motion for appointment of counsel on appeal.

______________________________
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC. PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Clifton A. Payne, Chief Financial Officer of Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), that:

| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and   15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and               
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                    
| | 2. | the   information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material   respects, the Companys financial condition and results of operations.

|By:                       | /s/  CLIFTON A. PAYNE                                                  | 
|------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                          |                                                                        | 
|                          | Clifton A.   Payne    Senior. Vice President & Chief Financial Officer | 
|                          |                                                                        | 
|Dated:  November 10, 2004 |
LOGO

|                                                         |  |  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                    
|-------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |  |  |  | Raymond Chabot Grant Thornton LLP Suite 2000 National Bank Tower
600 De La Gauchetière Street West
Montréal, Quebec H3B 4L8 
Telephone: 514-878-2691 Fax:
514-878-2127 www.rcgt.com

We have issued our reports dated March 6, 2013, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting in the Annual Report of Intertape Polymer Group Inc.
(the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012.

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said
reports in the Registration Statements of Intertape Polymer Group Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-67732, effective August 16, 2001; File No. 333-97961, effective August 12, 2002; File No. 333-108077, effective
August 19, 2003, File No. 333-114954 effective April 28, 2004; File No. 3333-89763 effective October 27, 1999; File No. 333-114960 effective April 28, 2004; File No. 333-135599 effective July 5, 2006; and
File No. 333-184797 effective November 7, 2012).



LOGO

Montreal, Canada

March 26, 2013



1CPA auditor, CA, public accountancy permit No. A120795

Partnership of Chartered
Professional Accountants

Member of Grant Thornton International Ltd
#### GLENDALE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, a Corporation, v. NICK BONANO, ROSEMARY COPPOLA, HELEN HARPER, ELIZABETH BRANCH, JESSIE BAILEY, ELIZABETH WOLFE, ADDIE HENSON, and INTERNATIONAL LADIES GARMENT WORKERS UNION.

(Filed 21 September, 1955.)

Contempt of Court § 2b—

Upon tbe bearing of an order to show cause why defendants should not be held in contempt for violating an order theretofore issued restraining defendants from certain specific unlawful acts in regard to mass picketing and intimidation of employees desiring to continue their employment after a strike, the findings of the court *held,*supported by evidence, and judgment holding defendants in contempt and imposing punishment is affirmed. G.S. 5-1 (4).

Winborne and Higgins, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Appeal by defendants from *Whitmire, J.,*May Term 1955, of BuNCOMBE.

This was a citation for contempt of court for willful disobedience of a restraining order.

From judgment holding defendants in contempt and imposing punishment the defendants appealed.

*Harkins, Van Winkle, Walton & Buck and Herbert L. Hyde for Plaintiff Appellee.*

*George Pennell for Defendants Appellants.*

Per Curiam.

Following a labor dispute in plaintiff’s manufacturing plant, a number of the employees went out on strike, and these, with others, engaged in mass picketing and threats of violence and other means of intimidation to deter those employees who desired to continue their employment. Thereupon plaintiff instituted this action, and upon its verified complaint the court issued a restraining order restraining the defendants from certain specific unlawful acts. Thereafter upon affidavits filed alleging violation of the restraining order, order to show cause was issued, and after notice the court heard the evidence offered by plaintiff and defendants and found the facts. Upon the facts so found the court concluded that the defendants were guilty of contempt of court for willful disobedience of specified provisions of the restraining order, and imposed punishment therefor.

From an examination of the record and the evidence offered, it appears that the facts found by the court are supported by the evidence, and that the conclusions of law were properly predicated thereon. The *591judgment holding the defendants in contempt of court for willful disobedience of a lawful order of the court will be upheld. G.S. 5-1 (4).

Judgment affirmed.

WiNBORNE and HiggiNS, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
EXHIBIT 12.2




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      302


THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






I,
Álvaro
      Rodríguez Arregui, certify that:




1.  I
      have
      reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Vitro, S.A. de C.V.;




2.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
      in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
      results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods
      presented in this report;




4.  The
      company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
      and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules
      13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:




(a)  designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
      and
      procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
      information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
      is
      made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
      in which this report is being prepared;




(b)  evaluated
      the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and
      presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
      this
      report based on such evaluation; and




(c)  disclosed
      in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial
      reporting









that
      occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially
      affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal
      control over financial reporting; and




5.  The
      company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's
      auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of
      directors:




(a)  all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report
      financial information; and




(b)  any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial
      reporting.




Date:
                June 30, 2005
            /s/ Álvaro Rodríguez
                ArreguiName:Álvaro
                Rodríguez ArreguiTitle:Chief
                Financial Officer
1The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, United States District Judge for the District

of Nebraska.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 99-3136

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Nebraska.

Jose Lara, Jr., *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: March 6, 2000

 Filed: March 13, 2000

___________

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, BOWMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Jose Lara, Jr. pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute and possess with intent

to distribute methamphetamine and cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (1994).

The District Court1 sentenced him to 188 months imprisonment and five years

supervised release. On appeal, Lara challenges the Court’s application of a two-level

enhancement for possessing a firearm in connection with the offense, the Court’s

application of a three-level enhancement for being a manager or supervisor of the
-2-

criminal activity, the Court’s denial of Lara’s motion for a downward departure, and

the reliability of the evidence presented at sentencing.

We conclude that the District Court did not clearly err in determining Lara’s role

in the offense, see United States v. Johnson, 47 F.3d 272, 277 (8th Cir. 1995) (standard

of review), or in determining that he possessed a firearm in connection with the offense,

see United States v. Belitz, 141 F.3d 815, 817 (8th Cir. 1998) (standard of review), and

did not abuse its discretion in determining the reliability of the evidence presented at

sentencing, see United States v. Stavig, 80 F.3d 1241, 1247 (8th Cir. 1996) (standard

of review). As the Court was aware of its authority to grant a downward departure, and

discretionarily declined to do so, the issue is unreviewable on appeal. See United

States v. Turechek, 138 F.3d 1226, 1228 (8th Cir. 1998).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the District Court.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.