alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 12.3





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      302


THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






I,
      Claudio Del Valle Cabello, certify that:




1.  I
      have
      reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Vitro, S.A. de C.V.;




2.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
      in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
      results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods
      presented in this report;




4.  The
      company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
      and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules
      13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:




(a)  designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
      and
      procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
      information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
      is
      made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
      in which this report is being prepared;




(b)  evaluated
      the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and
      presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
      this
      report based on such evaluation; and




(c)  disclosed
      in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial
      reporting









that
      occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially
      affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal
      control over financial reporting; and




5.  The
      company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's
      auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of
      directors:




(a)  all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report
      financial information; and




(b)  any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial
      reporting.




Date:
                June 12, 2006
            /s/ Claudio Del Valle
                CabelloName:Claudio
                Del Valle CabelloTitle:Chief
                Administrative Officer
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 12

- 14891 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 4:11

- cr - 00249

- WTM

- GRS

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus ANAISSA BETH GERWALD, a.k.a. Anaizza Gerwald, a.k.a. Ann E Merraw, a.k.a. Ana Isabel Marraquin, a.k.a. Ana Isabel Garcia, Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia

________________________ (June 21, 2013) Before MARCUS , WILSON and KRAVITCH , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Case: 12-14891 Date Filed: 06/21/2013 Page: 1 of 22 Jo hn E. Morrison, appointed counsel for Anaissa Beth Gerwald in this direct criminal appeal , has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1 967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and Gerwald’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED

.

Case: 12-14891 Date Filed: 06/21/2013 Page: 2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Junior Colin, Appellant.

[772 NYS2d 807]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William Wetzel, J.), rendered October 24, 2001, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

The record establishes that defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal *(see People v Moissett,*76 NY2d 909 [1990]). In any event, were we to find that the waiver was invalid, or that it did not encompass his present challenge to the court’s declaration of a mistrial, we would find that the court properly exercised its discretion when it declared a mistrial, on the second day of deliberations, upon the basis of two *190notes from the jury stating that it could not reach a unanimous verdict *(see People v Baptiste,*72 NY2d 356, 360-361 [1988]; *Matter of Plummer v Rothwax,*63 NY2d 243 [1984]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Williams, Lerner and Marlow, JJ.
#### David H. Flack and others, Appellants, v. Village of Green Island, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Opinion by

Bockes, J.;

Landon, J., dissents in opinion.
#### J. W. HUGHES et al. v. GEORGE T. HEWLETT et ux.

(Filed 15 October, 1930.)

Appeal by plaintiffs from *Nunn, J.,*at April Term, 1930, of New HaNOVER.

Civil action to recover damages for an alleged breach of covenant of seizin, tried upon the following issue :

“Did the defendants breach the covenant of seizin contained in the deed executed by them to plaintiffs, ■ as alleged in the complaint ? Answer: No.” (The issue of damages was not answered.)

Judgment on the verdict for defendants, from which the plaintiffs appeal, assigning errors.

*Carr, Poisson & James for plaintiffs.*

*Herbert McClammy for defendants.*

Per Curiam.

The case resolved itself into a contest over disputed facts. The verdict speaks for itself. We have discovered no ruling or action on the part of the trial court which we apprehend erroneously influenced the result.

In the absence of demonstrated error, the verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.
NOTE: This form should be completed by the employee making the reasonable accommodation (RA) request and provided to 

his/her supervisor. An applicant should return the form to any Army employee with whom the applicant has had contact in 

connection with the application process. If third party is completing the form on behalf of the employee or a management 

official is documenting an oral RA request, a copy of the completed form will be provided to the employee to confirm receipt of 

the RA request. Supervisors must provide a copy of this form to the EEO Office or Disability Program Manager, who will assign a 

log number and return a copy of the form to the supervisor.

15

APPENDIX B

CONFIRMATION OF REQUEST FOR REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS

1. INDIVIDUAL INFORMATION

Applicant or Employee Name (Last, First, MI): ______________ Phone: _____________________

Pay Plan, Series, Grade: _____________________ Email: ___________________________________

Job Title: ______________________________________ Date of Request: _____________________

Organization: ___________________________________________ UIC: _______________________

Form Completed by: ____________________________ Date Form Completed: _________________

Phone: _________________________________ Email: _____________________________________

2. ACCOMMODATION REQUESTED: (Be as specific as possible, e.g... Sit-n Stand, CPU Reader, 

Interpreter, Telework, FMLA, Weather or Safety Leave, Telework, Alternate Work Scheduled 

The USANEC must approve all special software prior to installation

3. REASON FOR REQUEST: Be cautious “NOT” to provide any sensitive medical information that 

may violate the HIPAA Act of 1996, Public Law 104-191.

If accommodation is time sensitive, please explain:

Provide Form to Supervisor, Supervisor Forward to EEO

4. Supervisor Signature Acknowledge Receipt: ______________________ Date: ____________

5. Docket Number: (EEO Office will assign number) _______________________ Date: _____________
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# PHOTOS ANDVIDEOS

Search

Search

                                - All Images 
                                - Other 
                                - Space Shuttle 

                                - Upload Date
                                - Photo Date
                                - Title

----

Download Image: Full Size (2.92 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 244 (Wednesday, December 20, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 65648]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30867]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP96-102-000]


Columbia Gulf Transmission Company; Notice of Request Under 
Blanket Authorization

December 14, 1995.
    Take notice that on December 8, 1995, Columbia Gulf Transmission 
Company (Columbia Gulf), 1700 MacCorkle Avenue S.E., Charleston, West 
Virginia 25314-1599, file in Docket No. CP96-102-000 a request pursuant 
to Sections 157.205 and 157.211 of the Commission's Regulations under 
the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205, 157.211) for authorization to 
construct and operate an interconnection in Acadia Parish, Louisiana 
under Columbia Gulf's blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP83-
496-001 pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully 
set forth in the request that is on file with the Commission and open 
to public inspection.
    Columbia Gulf proposes to construct and operate a bi-directional 
interconnection with Egan Hub Partners (Egan) in Acadia Parish, 
Louisiana. The interconnection has been requested by Egan and the 
service will be provided on an interruptible basis and therefore, no 
impact is expected on Columbia Gulf's existing design day and annual 
obligation to its customers.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefore, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-30867 Filed 12-19-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 5- 12 30

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca,
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el le e ,

v.
Dem ari o Dan te Pal m er, al so kn own as R am se y Bel l, al so kn own as R am se y D. Bel l, al so kn own as Terran ce Be ll , als o k no wn as Terren ce Be ll , als o k no wn as Terran ce D. Bel l, al so kn own as De m ari o P al m er, al so kn own as C ot to n, al so kn own as M ik e, al so kn own as Orl an di s Gwi n, al so kn own as P at ric k Dri ve rs , als o kn own as Do nt ae J on es , als o k no wn as Mari o P al m er, al so kn own as De m ari on Pal m er, al so kn own as De m arri o N. Pal m er, al so kn own as El li otHol di n, al so

kn own as De m ari o Do nt ae Pa lm er,
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll an t

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e So ut he rn Dis tri ctof I owa- Dav enpo rt

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Ju ne 24 , 20 15 Fi le d: Ju ne 30 , 20 15 [Unpubl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re SM ITH, BOW MAN, an d C OLLOTO N, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.Dem ari o Pal m er di rect ly ap pe al s aft er he pl ed gu il ty to a drug of fen se , an d th e di st ric t co urt se nt en ced hi m to a te r m o f i mp ris on m en t be lo w th e cal cu la te d

1 Gui de li ne s ran ge

. His co un se l h a s mov ed to wit hd raw, an d ha s fil ed a br ie f un de r Ander s v. Ca li fo rn ia , 38 6 U.S. 73 8 (1 96 7) , arg ui ng th at th e di st ric t co ur t im pr op erl y de ni ed Pal m er’s req ue st fo r a do wnwar d de pa rtu re ba se d on an ov ers ta te d cr i mina l hi st ory , andth atPal m er’s s en te nc e is subs ta nt iv el y un reas on ab le

.
The de ni al of Pal m er’s req ue st fo r a do wnwar d de pa rtu re is no t rev ie wab le on ap pe a l , a s th e di st ric t co ur t reco gn iz ed it s au th or it y to de pa rt, an d th ere is no in di cat io n th a t t he di st ric t co ur t ha d an y un co ns ti tu ti on al m ot iv e in de nyin g th e req ue st

. Se e Uni te d St at es v. Ander so n , 57 0 F.3 d 10 25 , 10 34 (8 th Ci r. 20 09 ). As to th e subs ta nt iv e reas on ab le ne ss of Pal m er’s se nt en ce, we co nc lu de , up on c a r e f u l

rev ie w, th at no ab us e of di sc ret io n oc cu rred

. Se e Uni te d St at es v. Feems te r , 57 2 F.3 d 45 5, 46 1- 62 (8 th Ci r. 20 09 ) (en ba nc ); Uni te d St at es v. Moo re , 58 1 F.3 d 68 1, 68 3 (8 th Ci r. 20 09 ) (p er cu ria m ).

In ad di ti on , h av in g in de pe nd en tl y rev ie wed th e reco rd pu rs ua nt to Pen so n v. Ohi o , 48 8 U.S. 75 (1 98 8) , we fin d no no nf riv ol ou s is su es

. A c c o r d i n gl y , we gr an t

co un se l’s m ot io n t o wi th dr aw, an d we a ffi rm

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

The Hon or ab le St ep ha ni e M. Ro se , Uni te d S t a te s Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e 1 So ut he rn Dis tri ctof I owa

. -2

-
Exhibit 10.8


 


FIRST AMENDEDMENT TO MILLING OPERATIONS AGREEMENT


 


This First Amendment to Milling Operations Agreement
is made and entered into as of the __ of July, 2022 by and between APPLIED MINERALS INC., a Delaware corporation, having its principal
place of business at 1200 Silver City Road, PO Box 432, Eureka, Utah 84628 ("AMI"), and BRADY MCCASLAND, INC.,
("BMI”), a Missouri corporation having its principal place of business at 16640 Chesterfield Grove Road, Suite
170, Chesterfield, MO 63005.


 





AMI and BMI may be referred to herein collectively
as the "Parties" or individually as a "Party."


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration
of the amount paid to AMI by BMI Minerals Company (“BMC”), a sister company to BMI under common ownership, as an Additional
Deposit (as the term is defined in the Second Amendment to Iron Sale Agreement), and for good and valuable consideration, the receipt
and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:


 


This First Amendment to Milling Operations Agreement amends the Milling
Operations Agreement, entered into between the Parties on May 31, 2022.


 


AMI and BMI agree that the Milling Operations Agreement is amended as follows:


 


		1.	Section 8.12 is added as follows:



 


Section 8.12 Assignment The Milling Operations Agreement
is assignable in whole or in part without the consent of AMI.


  



    	 	1	 



     


    




  


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed
this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.


   


	APPLIED MINERALS, INC.	 	BRADY MCCASLAND, INC.
	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	 	 	By:	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Name:	 	 	Name:	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Title:	 	 	Title:	 





 







    	 	2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      12,477,363
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             5,415,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 22,712,876
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         823,250
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    128,352,393
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,482,895
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             169,532,127
<DEPOSITS>                                 120,831,480
<SHORT-TERM>                                 2,419,890
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          5,435,281
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        58,538
<OTHER-SE>                                  40,786,938
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             169,532,127
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              6,008,352
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,104,395
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               689,175
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             7,801,922
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,766,350
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,273,499
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,273,499
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  983,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              31,729
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              5,867,953
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,901,459)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                  (1,901,459)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,178,876)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.20)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                    216,228
<LOANS-PAST>                                   581,412
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              1,206,724
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,073,346
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  587,420
<RECOVERIES>                                    13,969
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,482,895
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,482,895
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 -0.18 -0.23 -5% -5%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

September 15, 2023

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Level of Monthly Benefits

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: B6.4. Starting in 2024, provide a 5 percent uniform benefit increase 24 years after 

initial benefit eligibility. Phase in the benefit increase at 1 percent per year from the 20th through 24th years 

after eligibility. For disabled workers, the eligibility age is the initial entitlement year to the benefit. The 

benefit increase is equal to 5 percent of the PIA of a worker assumed to have career-average earnings 

equal to SSA's average wage index. Auxiliary beneficiaries receive benefit enhancement based on the 

PIA of the governing worker.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 2.26 2.60 63% 60%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

September 15, 2023

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable)

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: E2.17. Apply 12.4 percent payroll tax rate on earnings above $400,000 starting in 

2024 and tax all earnings once the current-law taxable maximum exceeds $400,000. Do not provide 

benefit credit for additional earnings taxed.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision