alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5682 

To approve the Keystone XL Pipeline. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 12, 2014 

Mr. CASSIDY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce and Natural Resources, for a period 

to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 

concerned 

A BILL 

To approve the Keystone XL Pipeline. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. KEYSTONE XL APPROVAL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, 

5 L.P. may construct, connect, operate, and maintain the 

6 pipeline and cross-border facilities described in the appli7 cation filed on May 4, 2012, by TransCanada Corporation 

8 to the Department of State (including any subsequent re9 vision to the pipeline route within the State of Nebraska 

10 required or authorized by the State of Nebraska). 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5682 IH

1 (b) ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT.—The 

2 Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement 

3 issued by the Secretary of State in January 2014, regard4 ing the pipeline referred to in subsection (a), and the envi5 ronmental analysis, consultation, and review described in 

6 that document (including appendices) shall be considered 

7 to fully satisfy— 

8 (1) all requirements of the National Environ9 mental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.); 

10 and 

11 (2) any other provision of law that requires 

12 Federal agency consultation or review (including the 

13 consultation or review required under section 7(a) of 

14 the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 

15 1536(a))) with respect to the pipeline and facilities 

16 referred to in subsection (a). 

17 (c) PERMITS.—Any Federal permit or authorization 

18 issued before the date of enactment of this Act for the 

19 pipeline and cross-border facilities referred to in sub20 section (a) shall remain in effect. 

21 (d) FEDERAL JUDICIAL REVIEW.—Any legal chal22 lenge to a Federal agency action regarding the pipeline 

23 and cross-border facilities described in subsection (a), and 

24 the related facilities in the United States, that are ap25 proved by this Act, and any permit, right-of-way, or other 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5682 IH

1 action taken to construct or complete the project pursuant 

2 to Federal law, shall only be subject to judicial review on 

3 direct appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for 

4 the District of Columbia Circuit. 

5 (e) PRIVATE PROPERTY SAVINGS CLAUSE.—Nothing 

6 in this Act alters any Federal, State, or local process or 

7 condition in effect on the date of enactment of this Act 

8 that is necessary to secure access from an owner of private 

9 property to construct the pipeline and cross-border facili10 ties described in subsection (a). 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
FOR PUBLICATION



### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

G ERARDO V AZQUEZ ; G LORIA R OMAN ; J UAN A GUILAR , on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated, Plaintiffs

- Appellants

,

v.

J AN

- P RO F RANCHISING I NTERNATIONAL , I NC

. , Defendant

- Appellee. No. 17

- 16096

D.C. No. 3:16

- cv

- 05961

- WHA

ORDER

Filed July 22 , 2019

Before: Ronald M. Gould and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges, and Frederic Block, District Judge. *

Order

* The Honorable Frederic Block, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.2 V AZQUEZ V

. J AN

- P RO F RANCHISING I NT ’ L

ORDER

Defendant

- Appellee’s Petition for Panel Rehearing (Dkt. 93) is GRANTED

. The opinion in the above

- captioned matter filed on May 2 , 20 19 , and published at 923 F.3d 5 75 , is WITHDRAWN

. A revised disposition and an order certifying to the California Supreme Co urt the question of whether Dynamex Ops. W. Inc. v. Superior Court , 416 P.3d 1 (Cal. 2018), applies retroactively will be filed in due

course.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Jeffrey J. Bairstow, certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/Aof Dendrite International, Inc.;

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;

Date: April 30, 2007

|   | By:    | /s/ JEFFREY J.  BAIRSTOW                             |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Jeffrey J. Bairstow                                  |
|   | Title: | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4402 Filed: 10/22/19 Entered: 10/22/19 23:38:56 Page 1 of

8
4400.

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4402 Filed: 10/22/19 Entered: 10/22/19 23:38:56 Page 2 of

8
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4402 Filed: 10/22/19 Entered: 10/22/19 23:38:56 Page 3 of

8
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4402 Filed: 10/22/19 Entered: 10/22/19 23:38:56 Page 4 of

8
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4402 Filed: 10/22/19 Entered: 10/22/19 23:38:56 Page 5 of

8
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4402 Filed: 10/22/19 Entered: 10/22/19 23:38:56 Page 6 of

8
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4402 Filed: 10/22/19 Entered: 10/22/19 23:38:56 Page 7 of

8
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4402 Filed: 10/22/19 Entered: 10/22/19 23:38:56 Page 8 of

8
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lionbridge Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Rory J. Cowan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Donald M. Muir, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 7, 2010



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|/S/ RORY J. COWAN                                    
|Rory J. Cowan                                        
|Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|                                                     
|/S/ DONALD M. MUIR                                   
|Donald M. Muir                                       
|Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)



32
#### STATE v. M. S. LEWIS.

(Filed 30 November, 1927.)

1. Indictment — Defects — Schools — School Terms — Public Schools — Statutes — Criminal Law.

An indictment under the provisions of O. S., 5758, charging a parent with unlawfully and wilfully failing to cause his children, between the ages of 8 and 14 years, to attend the public schools of the district of his and the children’s residence, as required by the statute, is defective in not observing the distinction that the parent, having the custody of his children, may have them attend private schools for the required period, and no conviction may be had under the charge set out in the indictment.

2. Judgments — Arrest of Judgment — Indictment—Defects in Indictment.

Where a fatal defect in the charge of an indictment for a criminal offense, appears upon its face, it may be taken advantage of by motion in arrest of judgment.

Appeal by defendant from *Schenck, J.,*at April Term, 1927, of CABARRUS.

*621Criminal prosecution tried upon a warrant charging that the defendant “on or about the .... day of February, 1927, did unlawfully and wil-fully fail to cause Ms children, between the ages of 7 and 14 years, to attend public school in Kannapolis, in the district in which said children reside, as required by the statute in such cases made and provided,” etc.

From an adverse verdict and judgment pronounced thereon, the defendant appeals, assigning errors.

*Attorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash, for the State.*

*H. 8. Williams and Z. A. Morris, Jr., for defendant.*

Stacy, C. J.

The judgment must be arrested on authority of what was said in *S. v. Johnson,*188 N. C., 591, 125 S. E., 183, for that no crime is charged in the warrant upon which the defendant has been tried and convicted.

It is provided by C. S., 5758, with certain exemptions not now material, that every parent, guardian, or other person in the State having charge or control of a child between the ages of eight and fourteen years “shall cause such child to attend school continuously for a period equal to the time which the public school in the district in which the child resides shall be in session.”

It will be observed that the statute does not make the failure to cause the attendance of a child, between the ages mentioned, in the public school a crime, but the offense is defined as the failure on the part of the parent, guardian, or other person having control of such child, to cause said child to attend school continuously for a period equal to the time the public school of the district shall be in session. Indeed, it would be an infringement upon the rights of private schools to require that all children of school age shall attend one of the public schools of the district in which they reside. *Pierce v. Society of Sisters,*268 U. S., 510.

The defect or omission appearing, as it does, on the face of the record, may be taken advantage of by motion in arrest of judgment. *S. v. Jenkins,*164 N. C., 527, 80 S. E., 231; *S. v. Baker,*106 N. C., 758, 11 S. E., 360.

Error.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 335 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 335

 To reauthorize the Tropical Forest and Coral Reef Conservation Act of 
                                 1998.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 22, 2021

 Mr. Portman (for himself, Mr. Coons, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. Schatz, and 
   Mr. Burr) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To reauthorize the Tropical Forest and Coral Reef Conservation Act of 
                                 1998.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Tropical Forest and Coral Reef 
Conservation Reauthorization Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION.

    Section 806(d) of the Tropical Forest and Coral Reef Conservation 
Act of 1998 (22 U.S.C. 2431d(d)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following new paragraphs:
            ``(9) $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2022.
            ``(10) $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2023.
            ``(11) $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2024.
            ``(12) $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2025.
            ``(13) $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2026.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,  Craig A. Fielding, as the Chief Executive Officer of Consorteum Holdings, Inc., certify that (i) Amendment Number 1 to the Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements of  Section  13(a)  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained  in Amendment Number 1 to the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Consorteum Holdings, Inc.
 
 
 /s/ Craig A. Fielding
 Craig A. Fielding,  President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer
 November 16,  2010
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Office of the Chief Actuary | Single-Year Tables Consistent with 2001 OASDI Trustees ReportUpdated March 19, 2001      Historical document   |
|-----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
### Proposed Provision: C1.4. Increase the normal retirement age (NRA) 2 months per year for those age 62 starting in 2024 and ending in 2035 (NRA reaches 69 for those age 62 in 2035). Thereafter, increase the NRA 1 month every 2 years.

back
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3305 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3305

   To repeal the amendment made to the Superfund excise taxes by the 
                Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 2, 2021

 Mr. Cruz (for himself, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Toomey, Mr. Lee, 
 and Mr. Barrasso) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
                and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To repeal the amendment made to the Superfund excise taxes by the 
                Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Chemical Tax Repeal Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF CERTAIN SUPERFUND EXCISE TAX MODIFICATIONS.

    The amendments made by section 80201 of the Infrastructure 
Investment and Jobs Act are repealed.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Meditecnic, Inc. (the "Company") on Form  10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof  (the "Report"),  I, Luc Badel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Luc Badel

By: Luc Badel

Chief Financial  Officer

December 15, 2008
### Proposed Provision: C1.4. Increase the normal retirement age (NRA) 2 months per year for those age 62 starting in 2024 and ending in 2035 (NRA reaches 69 for those age 62 in 2035). Thereafter, increase the NRA 1 month every 2 years.
#### George B. Ramson et al. v. Nathaniel Kitner.

*Dogs—Damages for Killing.*

*'*In an action brought to recover the value of a dog mistaken for a wolf and killed, this cgurt holds that the defendants are liable for the damages resulting from tlieir mistake.

[Opinion filed February 21, 1889.]

Appeal from the County Court of Morgan County; the Hon. O. P. Thompson, Judge, presiding.

*242Messrs. Morrison *&*Whitlock and O. A. De Leuw, for appellants.

Messrs. M. T. Layman and F. D. MoAvoy, for appellee.

Conger, J.

This was an action brought by appellee against appellants to recover the value of a.dog killed by appellants, and a judgment rendered for $50.

The defense was that appellants were hunting for wolves, that appellee’s dog had a striking resemblance to a wolf, that they in good faith believed it to be one, and killed it as such.

Many points are made, and a lengthy argument filed to show that error in the trial below was committed, but we are inclined to think that no material error occurred to the prejudice of appellants.

The jury held them liable for the value of the dog, and we do not see how they could have done otherwise under the evidence. Appellants are clearly liable for the damages caused by their mistake, notwithstanding they were acting in good faith.

We see no reason for interfering with the conclusion reached by the jury, and the judgment will be affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
#### John L. Swanson et al. v. Canute R. Matson, for use, etc.

Capias—Habeas *Corpus—Bail—Forfeiture—Chap. 28 B. S.—Failure to Set out judgment in Action on Bond.*

1. A person in custody under final process in a civil case can not be set at liberty temporarily on any form of security except under the act concerning insolvents.

2. An order of court to the sheriff to take bail prohibited by the statute does not make it valid or give the party sought to be benefited any remedy upon the same.

[Opinion filed April 3, 1889.]

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Richard *W.*Clifford, Judge, presiding.

*595Messrs. Condee & Rose, for appellants.

Messrs. A. C. and F. W. Story, for appellees.

Gary, J.

One Bodelson, being in jail under a *ca.*sot. issued from the Circuit Court at the suit of Carlson, for whose use this suit is brought, applied by petition to one of the judges of that court for a writ of *habeas corpus.*The judge ordered that the writ issue, and that the sheriff take bail of Bodelson to appear three days thereafter. After many postponements the bail was forfeited for his non-appearance. This suit is brought to recover the amount for the collection of which the *ca. sa.*issued.

It is a sufficient ground for the reversal of this judgment that the judgment of Carlson against Bodelson, the loss of the means of collecting which, is the damage to be compensated, if any can be in this case, is not set out in the declaration. But the bond is itself void. There is no statute or common law for setting at liberty, temporarily, on any form of security, one in custody under final process in a civil case, except under the act concerning insolvents. The statute 23, H. 6 C. 9, recited in Bacon Ah., Sheriff O, is in force here. Chap. 28 R. S. The decision under that statute, that all bonds taken by the sheriff from a prisoner in his custody, except such as the statute authorizes, are void, are very numerous. See Bacon, cited above; Sullivan v. Alexander, 19 Johnson, 233.

A court can not make laws to fit every fancied inconvenience that may present itself. An order to the sheriff to take such bail as the statute prohibits, does not make that bail valid, and give the party for whom it was intended as a security, any remedy upon it.

So the directions of the court to the sheriff to take the bond sued upon, though made upon a petition for *habeas corpus,*gives no right of action upon the bond.

*Judgment reversed.*
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  OF GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC. PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Clifton A. Payne, Chief Financial Officer of Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), that:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of   Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,   and             
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                    
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly   presents, in all material respects, the Companys financial condition and   results of operations.

|By:  /s/  CLIFTON A. PAYNE                      | 
|----------------------------------------------- | 
|                                                | 
|Clifton A. Payne                                | 
|Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer | 
|                                                | 
|Dated:   May   12, 2005                         |
Exhibit 23.1




















CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





The Board of Directors





Clayton Williams Energy, Inc.:





We consent to the incorporation by reference in registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-68320, 33-68316, 33-69688, and 33-92834 ) and on Form S-3 (No. 333-116825) of Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. and subsidiaries of our reports dated February 28, 2011 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010,  and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, which reports appear in the December 31, 2010 annual report on Form 10-K of Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. and subsidiaries.











/s/ KPMG LLP





Dallas, Texas


February 28, 2011
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 237 (Monday, December 11, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 63574]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30268]

LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION

Finance Committee

TIME AND DATE: The Finance Committee of the Legal Services 
Corporation's Board of Directors will meet on December 17, 1995. The 
meeting will begin at 1:00 p.m. and continue until conclusion of the 
committee's agenda.

LOCATION: Legal Services Corporation, 750 First Street NE, 11th Floor, 
Washington, DC 20002, (202) 336-8800.

STATUS OF MEETING: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Approval of Agenda.
    2. Approval of Minutes of the Committee's meeting of October 6, 
1995.
    3. Staff report on expenses.
    4. Develop a Consolidated Operating Budget to recommend to the 
Board.
    5. Develop a Budget Request to Congress for FY '97 to recommend 
to the Board.
    6. Consider and act on other business.

CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION: Victor M. Fortuno, General Counsel, 
(202) 336-8800.

SPECIAL NEEDS: Upon request, meeting notices will be made available in 
alternate formats to accommodate visual and hearing impairments. 
Individuals who have a disability and need an accommodation to attend 
the meeting may notify Barbara Asante, at (202) 336-8800.

    Dated: December 7, 1995.
Victor M. Fortuno,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 95-30268 Filed 12-7-95; 2:43 pm]

BILLING CODE 7050-01-M
```