alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3331 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3331

To amend the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2021 to improve the semiconductor incentive program 
                     of the Department of Commerce.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 7, 2021

 Mr. Peters (for himself, Mr. Portman, Mrs. Blackburn, and Mr. Kelly) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
           Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2021 to improve the semiconductor incentive program 
                     of the Department of Commerce.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Investing in Domestic Semiconductor 
Manufacturing Act''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION FOR UPSTREAM MANUFACTURERS.

    (a) Definitions.--Section 9901(2) of the William M. (Mac) 
Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (15 
U.S.C. 4651(2)) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``production,'' before ``or research and 
        development''; and
            (2) by striking ``of semiconductors.'' and inserting ``of 
        semiconductors, materials used to manufacture semiconductors, 
        or semiconductor manufacturing equipment.''.
    (b) Semiconductor Incentives.--Section 9902(a) of the William M. 
(Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2021 (15 U.S.C. 4652(a)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) by striking ``for semiconductor fabrication'' 
                and inserting ``for the fabrication'';
                    (B) by inserting ``production,'' before ``or 
                research and development''; and
                    (C) by striking the period at the end and inserting 
                ``of semiconductors, materials used to manufacture 
                semiconductors, or semiconductor manufacturing 
                equipment.''; and
            (2) in paragraph (4)(A), by striking ``used for 
        semiconductors'' and inserting ``used for the purposes''.
                                 <all>
```
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Level of Monthly Benefits (PIA) | Description of Proposed Provision:      Multiply all PIA formula factors successively by 0.991 for new benefit eligibility in each year 2012 through 2040.   Disabled workers and young survivors (surviving spouses with a child-in-care and survivor children) would not be affected by this provision.  Upon conversion from disabled worker to retired worker benefits, benefit levels would be proportionally reduced based on the fraction of years the individual was not disabled between ages 22 and 62. |
|---------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2008 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified August 11, 2008 |
### Proposed Provision: C1.3. Starting for those age 62 in 2024, index the normal retirement age (NRA) to maintain a constant ratio of expected retirement years (life expectancy at NRA) to potential work years (NRA minus 20). We assume the NRA will increase 1 month every 2 years.

back
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-06-068-CR

NO. 2-06-069-CR

NO. 2-06-070-CR

JOSEPH DANIEL NELSON	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM THE 396TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Appellant Joseph Daniel Nelson entered an open plea of guilty to three counts of aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon, and the trial court sentenced him to life imprisonment.  In one point, Appellant contends that the trial court erred by considering the presentence investigation report (the PSI) because it contained hearsay and therefore violated Appellant’s rights under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution.  Appellant admits that he did not object to the PSI at trial.  To preserve a complaint about the denial of the rights of confrontation and cross- examination, Appellant is required to show that he objected to such Sixth Amendment violations.2  We reject Appellant’s request to treat the alleged error as fundamental error,3 overrule his sole point, and affirm the trial court’s judgments.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL F:	DAUPHINOT, HOLMAN, and GARDNER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED:  October 12, 2006
<PAGE>   1
 
   
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
    
 
   
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
    
 
   
     We consent to the use in Registration Statement No. 33-45671 of Utopia
Marketing, Inc. (formerly Sam & Libby, Inc.) (the "Company") on Form S-8 of our
report dated March 31, 1998 appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of
Utopia Marketing, Inc. for the year ended January 3, 1998.
    
 
   
     Our audits of the financial statements referred to in our aforementioned
report also include the financial statement schedule of Utopia Marketing, Inc.
(formerly Sam & Libby, Inc.) listed in Item 14(a)2. This financial statement
schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial
statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial
statements takes as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the
information set forth therein.
    
 
   
                                          MICHAEL, ADEST & BLUMENKRANTZ
    
 
   
New York, New York
    
 
   
May 1, 1998
# Court of Appeals

**First District of Texas**

BILL OF COSTS

No. 01

- 14

- 00762

- CV

In the Matter of B. D. S.

NO. 2013

- 06337J IN THE 313TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS C OUNTY

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/DUE STATUS PAID BY

MT FEE
RPT RECORD
CLK RECORD
FILING $10.00 $336.60 $15.00 $195.00 02/17/2015
01/16/2015
09/18/2014
09/12/2014 EXEMPT
PAID
INDIGENT
INDIGENT ANT
STA
ANT
ANT



### The costs incurred on appeal to the First Court of Appeals Houston, Texas are $55 6 .60.

Court costs in this case have been taxed in this Court’s judgment

I, Christopher A. Prine , Clerk o f the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, do hereby certify that this is a true statement of the costs of appeal in this case.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my ha nd and the seal of the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, this August 2 8 , 2015

.
#### J. E. CECIL v. F. G. BARBEE.

(Filed 7 December, 1927.)

Appeal by defendant from *Parker, J.,*at May Term, 1927, of Guil-eoed.

Affirmed.

Action to recover balance due on building contract. Defendant denies that he is indebted to plaintiff in the sum alleged in the complaint; he pleads counterclaims, upon which he demands judgment against plaintiff. The action was referred to a referee for trial.

From judgment overruling defendant’s exceptions to the report of the referee, and sustaining said report, defendant appealed to the Supreme Court.

*Gold & York for plaintiff.*

*Brittain, Brittain & Brittain for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

Upon an examination of the record on this appeal, and a consideration of the briefs filed in this Court by both parties, we find no error. The action arises out of controversies as to facts only; the findings of the referee are sustained by the judge. The evidence offered at the trial before the referee is not set out in the case on appeal. It must be presumed that there was evidence tending to prove the facts found by the referee and approved by the judge.

Upon these findings of fact there is no error and the judgment is

Affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0660 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JOSHUA DUANE WOLFBLACK,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including April 2 8, 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 22 2023

03/22/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0660
## Principal Economic Assumptions —            2023 OASDI Trustees Report

| Single-Year Tables | Historical data | Intermediate Assumptions | Low-Cost Assumptions | High-Cost Assumptions |
|--------------------|-----------------|--------------------------|----------------------|-----------------------|

----

| a            Estimated values for 2022 vary slightly by alternative and are shown            for the intermediate assumptions.b            Greater than -0.005 and less than 0.005 percent. |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Footer menu
#### ALBERT LEE DIXON v. McDOWELL INSURANCE AGENCY, a Corporation.

(Filed 21 September, 1955.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *Pless, J.,*February Term 1955 of Mo-Dowell.

Civil action for damages for the alleged breach of an alleged contract to procure collision insurance upon an automobile.

From judgment of nonsuit entered at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence, the plaintiff appeals, assigning as error the entry of the judgment.

*John H. McMurray and Sam J. Ervin, III, for Plaintiff, Appellant.*

*Proctor & Dameron for Defendant, Appellee.*

PeR CuRIAm.

A study of the evidence satisfies us that the Trial Court was correct in entering a judgment of nonsuit, upon motion of the defendant, and the said judgment is

Affirmed.

WiNBORNE and Higgins, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
PERSONAL DATA-PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a)

`

PERSONAL DATA-PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a)

AIR FORCE ELEMENT- J1 DESK

SCO In-processing Worksheet

Member Information:

Rank/Name: __________________________________ SSAN: ____________________ 

RNLTD: ____________ Date Arrived in Country: ______________ Date Departed Last Base: ______________ 

Date Departed CONUS: _________________ Duty Location: ____________________ 

Duty Title:___________________________________ DAFSC: __________________

DOB: ______________________ Duty Phone: _____________________ Cell Phone: ___________________

Is EPR/OPR coming from last base? ____Y _____ N Close Out Date of Last Report: ________________ 

# Days TDY enroute (must reflect on orders): _____________________ 

Supervisor Information: 

Name: ________________________________ SSAN (AF ONLY):____________________

Branch of Service: ____________________ Supervision Start Date (One day after arrival): _______________

Member Actions

In processing Documents: Scan and e-mail the following documents from sealed envelope to J1:

1.Endorsed orders 2.AF Form 330 3.Fitness Report 4.SGLI 5.vRED

Leave web Setup: Edit Profile: Update email; MAJCOM: SpOC; BASE: Patrick; UNIT: AFELM SOUTHCOM

eFinance: Attached are instructions to assist in filing your travel voucher. If you have questions, please contact Patrick’s 

Finance Office (numbers below).

AF Desk Actions

Pre-Arrival Actions:

___ Build e-PIF ____ Project in FMTS MilPDS Pos number: ______________

___ Update Sponsor ____ Add arrival date to calendar FMTS Pos number: _____________

Billet Duty Title: ______________________________________________________________

Arrival Updates:

___ FMTS ____ Update Rater (1 day after arrival) ___ Update Duty Title _____ DEROS

____ Milpds gain ____ Assignment Avail Code (Enlisted only- code 50) ___ AEF Update ___ Office Symbol ____ Add member to 

distro Lists (SOUTHCOM email) ____ Milpds pos number
PERSONAL DATA-PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a)

`

PERSONAL DATA-PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a)

 

AFELM CC: Col Cotto-Perez: x-1117

 Section CC: Maj Nevarez x-3773

NCOIC, J1 AF Desk: TSgt Bailey x-1258

NCOIC, Reserve Affairs: MSgt Christopher x-1258

 Strength Management Advisor: Ms. Diaz X-1116

 Senior Enlisted Advisor: SMSgt Scarborough x-3034

DSN: 567-ext Comm 305-437-ext

 

eFinance Website:

https://efinanceworkspace.wpafb.af.mil

Contact your local Accounting & Finance Office for further guidance

AFELM HQ USSOUTHCOM/J1

9301 NW 33rd St Doral, FL 33172

PATRICK AFB Key Phone Numbers

Finance: 4finance@us.af.mil

 DSN 854-4882/2796

 Comm: 321-494-4882/2796

Military Personnel Section

Career Development: 854-2330

Force Management: 854-7834

Customer Service: 854-6144/6147
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual Balance 

in 75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Ann

Balan

75th 

-1.92% -5.70% 0.61% 0.90% -1.31% -4.8

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2005 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actu

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Level of Monthly Benefits (PIA)

Proposed Provision: Reduce benefits by 5 percent for those newly eligible for benefits in 200

January 4, 2006

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this prov

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

0.005.00

10.0015.0020.0025.00

2005 2015 2025 2035 2045 2055 2065 2075

Year

Percent

Cost rates with this provisionCost rates under present lawIncome rates with this provisionIncome rates under present law

OASDI tax rate schedule 

(employees and employers, each)

1993 and later 6.2%

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditu

0

100200300400500600700800900

1000

2005 2015 2025 2035 2045 205

Year

Percent

Present law with thi
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7620]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3128]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Notice of Merger of Approved Trustee

    Notice is hereby given that Ameritrust Texas, National Association, 
Houston, Texas, changed its name to Texas Commerce Trust Company, 
National Association effective September 28, 1993. Texas Commerce Trust 
Company, National Association merged with and into Texas Commerce Bank, 
National Association, P. O. Box 2558, Houston, Texas 77252-8341, 
effective December 17, 1993, with Texas Commerce Bank, National 
Association as the surviving corporation in the merger.

    Dated: February 2, 1995.

    By Order of the Maritime Administrator.
Murray A. Bloom,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-3128 Filed 2-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-81-P
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 22 (Wednesday, February 3, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 5771]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-01902]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

 National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group; 
NHLBI Mentored Clinical and Basic Science Review Committee.
    Date: February 25-26, 2016.
    Time: 10:30 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: The Westin Crystal City, 1800 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Arlington, VA 22202.
    Contact Person: Keith A. Mintzer, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and 
Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7186, Bethesda, MD 
20892-7924, 301-594-7947, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b9d4d0d7cdc3dccbd2f9d7d1d5dbd097d7d0d197ded6cf"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="492420273d332c3b22092721252b2067272021672e263f">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 28, 2016.
Michelle Trout,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-01902 Filed 2-2-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### W. E. WOOTEN v. B. F. HUNTLEY FURNITURE COMPANY.

(Filed 14 December, 1927.)

Appeal by defendant from *Lyon, Special Judqe,*at September Term, 1927, of Forsyth.

Civil action to recover damages for an alleged negligent injury, resulting in the loss of plaintiff’s right- eye and other personal injuries, tried in the Forsyth County Court on the usual issues of negligence, contributory negligence and damages, and resulting in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff.

On appeal to the Superior Court all exceptions were overruled, and the judgment of the county court upheld and affirmed. From this judgment the defendant appeals, insisting on the exceptions taken to the trial, which were overruled in the Superior Court.

*815*Wallace & Wells for plaintiff.*

*Manly, Bendren & Wamble for defendant.*

Pee OueiaM.

A careful perusal of the record leaves us with the impression that the case has been heard and determined substantially in accord with the principles of law applicable, and that the rulings of the Superior Court should be upheld. The appeal presents no new question of law, or one not heretofore settled by our decisions; it only calls for the application of old principles to new facts.

Affirmed.
#### CITY OF ELIZABETH CITY v. A. L. AYDLETT.

(Filed 19 December, 1930.)

Municipal Corporations H e — Tinder statutory authority a city may enjoin the violation of its zoning ordinance.

Section 8, chapter 250, Public Laws of 1923, permits the issuance of a restraining order in favor of a city against the erection and maintenance of a filling or gasoline station contrary to its ordinance, and the refusal to issue such restraining order on the ground that the remedy of the city for the violation of its zoning ordinance is by indictment alone is erroneous.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Gramner, J.,*23 April, 1930, at Columbia. From PasquotaNK.

Civil action to restrain the defendant from completing a gasoline filling or gasoline storage station, and from operating same in violation of a zoning ordinance, adopted pursuant to chapter 250, Public Laws 1923.

From a judgment dissolving the temporary restraining order on the ground that indictment, and not injunction, is the only available remedy, plaintiff appeals, assigning error.

*J. B. Leigh and Thompson & Wilson for p>lainiiff.*

*M. B. Simpson and McMullen & L&Roy for defendant.*

Stacy, C. J.

Section 8 of chapter 250, Public Laws 1923, provides that in case any building or structure is erected or maintained in violation of any ordinance or regulation adopted in pursuance thereof, the proper authorities of the municipality, in addition to other remedies, may institute any appropriate action or iiroceeding to restrain or abate *59sucb unlawful erection, maintenance, occupancy or use, and to prevent any illegal act in connection therewith.

This differentiates the case from *Elizabeth City v. Aydlett,*198 N. C., 585, 152 S. E., 681, and the trial court was in error in holding that plaintiff was precluded from testing the matter by injunction. 14 E. O. L., 379.

The validity of the ordinance is not involved on the present appeal. The appropriateness of the remedy selected by plaintiff is the only question presented for decision.

Error.
## Detailed Single Year Tables

- Individual Provisions
- Family Members

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						D1: Beginning in 2024, continue benefits for children of disabled or deceased workers until age 22 if the child is in high school, college or vocational school.**

### Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program

### Summarized Estimates
## Detailed Single Year Tables

- Individual Provisions
- Trust Fund Investment in Equities

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						G5: Invest 15 percent of the OASI and DI Trust Fund reserves in equities (phased in 2024-2033), assuming an ultimate 2.3 percent annual real rate of return on equities. Thus, the ultimate rate of return on equities is the same as that assumed for Trust Fund bonds.**

### Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program