alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 0.66 0.76 18% 18%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

September 15, 2023

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable)

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: E3.7. Increase the taxable maximum by an additional 2 percent per year beginning in 

2025 until taxable earnings equal 90 percent of covered earnings. Provide benefit credit for earnings up to 

the revised taxable maximum. Create a new bend point equal to the current-law taxable maximum with a 5 

percent formula factor applying above the new bend point.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  Exhibit 23.1




                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS








     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
of Cayenne Software, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-87314, 33-53298, 33-48766,
33-71964 and 333-12139) and Form S-3 (File Nos. 33-99956, 33-89940,
333-33917,333-36533 and 333-24627) of our report, which included an explanatory
paragraph about the merger of Cayenne Software, Inc. and Cadre Technologies
Inc. which has been accounted for as a pooling of interests, dated February 18,
1998, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Cayenne
Software, Inc. as of December 31, 1997 and 1996 and June 30, 1996, and for the
year ended December 31, 1997, the six-month period ended December 31, 1996 and
the year ended June 30, 1996, which report is included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.


                                              /s/  COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.


Boston, Massachusetts
March 31, 1998
**Exhibit 32**
**CERTIFICATION**
The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:
(1) The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period endedSeptember 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.     Date: November 14, 2003 /s/ Mark N. Schwartz        Chief Executive Officer     Date: November 14, 2003 /s/ James S. Murphy        Chief Financial Officer
24
## Summary Measures and Graphs

- Individual Provisions
- Family Members

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						D8: Beginning in 2024, continue benefits for children of disabled, retired, or deceased workers until age 26 if the child is in high school, college or vocational school.**

|  |  |
|--|--|
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 246 (Friday, December 22, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 66555]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31174]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION


Availability of Environmental Assessments

    Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 4332, the Commission has prepared and made 
available environmental assessments for the proceedings listed below. 
Dates environmental assessments are available are listed below for each 
individual proceeding.
    To obtain copies of these environmental assessments contact Ms. 
Tawanna Glover-Sanders, Interstate Commerce Commission, Section of 
Environmental Analysis, Room 3219, Washington, DC 20423, (202) 927-
6203.
    Comments on the following assessment are due 15 days after the date 
of availability:

AB-32 (Sub-No. 70X), Boston and Maine Corporation--Abandonment and 
Discontinuance of Service--Middlesex County, Massachusetts. EA 
available 12/11/95.
AB-364 (Sub-No. 2X), Texas Northeastern Division, Mid-Michigan 
Railroad, Inc.--Discontinuance of Service Exemption--in Lamar and Red 
River Counties, Texas; and
AB-3 (Sub-No. 125X), Missouri Pacific Railroad Company--Abandonment 
Exemption--in Lamar and Red River Counties, Texas. EA available 12/15/
95.
AB-448 (Sub-No. 1X), SF&L Railway, Inc.--Abandonment Exemption--In 
Ellis and Hill Counties, TX. EA available 12/15/95.

    Comments on the following assessment are due 30 days after the date 
of availability:
    None.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-31174 Filed 12-21-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7035-01-P
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

JUNE 27, 2006

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 05-10804

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 04-00028-CR-FTM-29DNF

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

TERRENCE DUBOSE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(June 27, 2006)

Before ANDERSON, BIRCH and DUBINA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Terrence DuBose appeals the 240-month sentence imposed
2

following his guilty plea to conspiracy with intent to distribute 50 grams or more

of cocaine base, 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A)(iii), 846.

On appeal, Dubose argues that Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S.

224, 118 S. Ct. 1219, 140 L. Ed. 2d 350 (1998), was incorrectly decided and that

his prior convictions, which the district court used to apply a career offender

enhancement, should have been alleged in the indictment and proven beyond a

reasonable doubt to a jury.

Dubose’s position is precluded by our many decisions attesting to the

continued validity of Almendarez-Torres. See United States v. Greer, 440 F.3d

1267, 1273 (11th Cir. 2006) (“As we have said several times, unless and until the

Supreme Court specifically overrules Almendarez-Torres, we will continue to

follow it.”). Accordingly, we conclude that the district court did not err in using

Dubose’s prior convictions, which were not charged in his indictment, to apply a

career offender enhancement to his offense level.

Dubose further argues on appeal that the district court erred by failing to

attach anything to the PSI as required by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure

32(i)(3)(C).

We review de novo legal questions concerning the Federal Rules of Criminal

Procedure. United States v. Noel, 231 F.3d 833, 836 (11th Cir. 2000).
3

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(i)(3) provides that a sentencing court

“must - for any disputed portion of the presentence report or other controverted

matter - rule on the dispute or determine that a ruling is unnecessary . . . and must

append a copy of the court's determinations under this rule to any copy of the

presentence report made available to the Bureau of Prisons.” Fed. R. Crim. P.

32(i)(3)(B), (C).

The record here demonstrates that the district court did not attach a written

statement of its determinations to the presentence report. “The failure of the

district court to append a written record of its findings is a ministerial matter,

however, which can be remedied on remand without resentencing.” United States

v. Kramer, 943 F.2d 1543, 1553 (11th Cir. 1990).

For the above-stated reasons, we affirm Dubose’s sentence, but remand the

case to the district court for the limited purpose of attaching a copy of the

sentencing hearing transcript to the presentence report.

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.
## Reports from the Board of Trustees (Subscribe)

- Office of the Chief Actuary  
-    
- Actuarial Publications 

### Detailed reports on the financial outlook for Social Security's *Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance* (OASDI) Trust Funds

 Latest Release :  2024 Report 

OASDI Trustees Reports by Publication Year: 

Select: 

----

Latest Release: 2024 Summary in HTML and in PDF 

Summary Reports by Publication Year (in PDF):  

----

Trustees Reports on the financial status of the Medicare program

Signatories to all Trustees Reports issued  in 1945 and later

 Special reports on OASI or DI Trust Fund assets dropping below 20 percent of annual cost within 10 years

    Request a printed copy of a Trustees Report

    Please note that requests for the printed copies of the Trustees Report may take up to a month to process.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          33,227
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,099
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (7,393)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,356
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                48,886
<PP&E>                                          99,820
<DEPRECIATION>                                (47,249)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 126,292
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,178
<BONDS>                                         34,031
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           144
<OTHER-SE>                                      57,612
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   126,292
<SALES>                                        182,849
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               182,849
<CGS>                                          120,918
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  164,030
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,603
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,216
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,231
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,985
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,985
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .72
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           6,986
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,261
<ALLOWANCES>                                        80
<INVENTORY>                                      5,322
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,753
<PP&E>                                           1,920
<DEPRECIATION>                                     548
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,158
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,807
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           118
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,233
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,158
<SALES>                                         20,837
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,918
<CGS>                                           10,767
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,767
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,524
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    50
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,627
<INCOME-TAX>                                       667
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                960
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       960
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  Jun-30-2000
<CASH>                                            378,950
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     146,335
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                       487,486
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                1,935,755
<PP&E>                                         11,909,454
<DEPRECIATION>                                  2,889,807
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 11,953,255
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           2,586,292
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                              283
<OTHER-SE>                                      7,319,752
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   11,953,255
<SALES>                                         5,936,361
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                5,936,361
<CGS>                                           2,255,590
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   2,255,590
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                4,090,625
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                133,262
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (335,344)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (335,344)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (335,344)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.12)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.01

                             MATERIAL SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                                      JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
------------------                                      -----------------------------
<S>                                                     <C>
The Art Institutes International, Inc.                  Pennsylvania
The Art Institute of Atlanta, Inc.                      Georgia
The Art Institute of Dallas, Inc.                       Texas
The Art Institute of Fort Lauderdale, Inc.              Florida
The Art Institute of Houston, Inc.                      Texas
The Illinois Institute of Art, Inc.                     Illinois
The Illinois Institute of Art at Schaumburg, Inc.       Illinois
The Art Institute of Los Angeles, Inc.                  California
The Art Institute of Los Angeles--Orange County,
  Inc.                                                  California
The Art Institutes International Minnesota, Inc.        Minnesota
The New York Restaurant School, Inc.                    New York
The Art Institute of Philadelphia, Inc.                 Pennsylvania
The Art Institute of Phoenix, Inc.                      Arizona
The Art Institutes International at Portland, Inc.      Oregon
The Art Institutes International at San Francisco,
  Inc.                                                  California
The Art Institute of Seattle, Inc.                      Washington
The Colorado Institute of Art, Inc.                     Colorado
The National Center for Professional Development,
  Inc.                                                  Georgia
NCPT, Inc.                                              Georgia
American Business and Fashion Institute, Inc.           North Carolina
Massachusetts Communications College                    Massachusetts
</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**SECTION906 CERTIFICATION**

 

The undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in hiscapacity as an officer of Allegiance Telecom, Inc. (the “Company”), that,to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended March 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 
|                | By:    | /s/ THOMAS M. LORD                                                             |
|---------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                | Name:  | Thomas M. Lord                                                                 |
| Dated: May 17, 2004 | Title: | EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT OF CORPORATE  DEVELOPMENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

1

----
#### In the Matter of Fernando Lopez, Petitioner, v Donald Selsky, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

[772 NYS2d 884]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule which prohibits the unauthorized use of a controlled substance. His urine sample tested positive for opiates on both an initial and confirmatory test. The record *898discloses an adequate chain of custody and that appropriate testing procedures were followed *(see Matter of Torres v Goord,*301 AD2d 713 [2003]). Regarding petitioner’s defense that the test result was a false positive due to his use of prescription and over-the-counter medications, we find that a new hearing is necessary because petitioner was deprived of a fair hearing. The Hearing Officer precluded our review of petitioner’s documentary evidence by failing to accept it in the record. The Hearing Officer’s telephone conversation with a representative from the testing company’s technical unit was not recorded and petitioner was excluded from the room during that conversation, in violation of state regulations and petitioner’s due process rights *(see*7 NYCRR 254.5 [b]; 254.6 [b]; *Matter of Hill v LeFevre,*124 AD2d 383 [1986]; *Matter of Kelemen v Coughlin,*128 Misc 2d 190, 192-193 [1985]). Because the determination was clearly based in part on this off-the-record information, a new hearing is required *(see Matter of Wyche v Coughlin,*191 AD2d 945, 946 [1993], *lv denied*82 NY2d 651 [1993]; *Matter of Nina v Coughlin,*191 AD2d 942 [1993], *lv denied*82 NY2d 651 [1993]; *but see Matter of Frazier v Goord,*251 AD2d 800 [1998], *lv denied*92 NY2d 813 [1998]).

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Peters, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is annulled, without costs, and matter remitted to the Commissioner of Correctional Services for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court’s decision.
Skip to main content

# Social Security

Search
Menu
Español
Sign in

## Interest Rates

Office of the Chief Actuary 

Interest rates, 2000 & later

Interest rates, 1937-99

Investments held by trust funds

Investments transactions

Trust fund asset growth

Trust fund data

**Investments**      All securities held by the       Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) and       Disability Insurance (DI) Trust Funds are       issued by the Federal government.  All of these securities are       special issues—securities       issued only to the trust funds.  In the past, the trust funds also held      marketable securities, which are available to the public.

**Interest rates**      Special-issue investments bear interest rates determined monthly by      a formula specified by law.      An interest rate is determined on the last business day of a month      and applies to securities issued in the following month.  Tables of such      monthly interest rates provide      rates back to 1937—the beginning of the Social Security program.

**Frequency of interest payments**      Interest on special-issue investments is paid semi-annually,       at the end of June and the end of December.       Because the trust funds hold no cash, investments are redeemed each month to       pay for benefits and administrative expenses. When investments are redeemed,       interest is paid.  The amount of interest paid is used to offset the amount       of investment redemptions.

**Effective interest rates**      Although new investments for each trust fund carry the       same interest rate, amounts of income and outgo differ between funds,       resulting in a different investment portfolio for each trust fund. An       *effective interest rate* provides a measure of the rate of return      on an investment portfolio.  We calculate an effective       interest rate by dividing interest earned on investments       during a calendar year by the average level of investments during the year.      A table of such effective       rates provides rates back to 1940 by trust fund.

The effective rates in the graph are for the combined OASI and DI      Trust Funds.  For comparison, the annual average of     the monthly special-issue rates are also shown.  The rates shown are for      1967 and later. Clicking on the graph will reveal the same type of data      going back to 1940.

Footer menu
#### Mary J. Graeffe, Respondent, v. Norman K. Shears, Appellant, Impleaded, etc.

Order overruling defendant’s demurrer and judgment thereon, affirmed, with costs Opinion by

Dykman, J.