alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3400 

To prohibit the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency from 

imposing a fee or reporting requirements on certain facilities for methane 

emissions. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 15, 2021 

Mr. MARSHALL (for himself, Mr. MORAN, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. DAINES, Mr. 

CRUZ, and Mr. INHOFE) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency from imposing a fee or reporting requirements on certain facilities for methane emissions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Marginal Well Protec5 tion Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3400 IS

1 SEC. 2. METHANE FEE AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 

2 FOR PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS SYS3 TEMS. 

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 

5 owner or operator of a facility that produces fewer than 

6 15 barrels of oil per day and less than 90,000 cubic feet 

7 of natural gas per day shall not, with respect to that facil8 ity, be subject to any fee or reporting requirements im9 posed by the Administrator of the Environmental Protec10 tion Agency in connection with reporting methane emis11 sions pursuant to subpart W of part 98 of title 40, Code 

12 of Federal Regulations (or successor regulations). 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

DARREN TALBERT, 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 338 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 27th day of October, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Cherish Adams, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of PSPP Holdings, Inc.



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.



4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in exchange act rules 13a-15(e) and 15d- 15(f)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;



c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: November 30, 2007



/s/ Cherish Adams

Cherish Adams,

Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent thereof)
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

         CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report of Transition Auto Finance II
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Kenneth C. Lowe, the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: October 31, 2003               /s/ Kenneth C. Lowe
                                     -----------------------------------------
                                     Kenneth C. Lowe
                                     Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer
#### William E. Smith, Respondent, v. Thomas Nelson and others, Appellants.

— Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 4 (Friday, January 6, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 2089]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-315]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Public Information Collection Requirement Submitted to the Office 
of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collections of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
Title; Applicable Form; and OMB Control Number; Air Force ROTC College 
Scholarship Application; AF Form 113; OMB Control Number 0701-0101
Type of Request: Expedited Processing--Approval date requested: 30 days 
following publication in the Federal Register
Number of Respondents: 2,000
Responses per of Respondent: 1
Annual Responses: 2,000
Average Burden per Response: 30 minutes
Annual Burden Hours: 1,000
Needs and Uses: The information collected hereby, provides the DoD 
approving authority with the data necessary to evaluate and rule on 
requests from the public for military aerial support at community 
relations Events
Affected Public: Individuals or households; State or local governments; 
Federal agencies or employees; and non-profit institutions
Frequency: On occasion
Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain a benefit
OMB Desk Officer: Mr. Edward C. Springer. Written comments and 
recommendations on the proposed information collection should be sent 
to Mr. Springer at the Office of Management and Budget, Desk Officer 
for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC. 
20503
DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. William Pearce. Written requests for copies 
of the information collection proposal should be sent to Mr. Pearce, 
WHS/DIOR, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 
22202-4302.

    Dated: January 3, 1995.

Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 95-315 Filed 1-5-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
### Proposed Provision: A2. Starting December 2024, reduce the annual COLA by 0.5 percentage point.
| (1)    |       | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and                                                              |
|--------|--------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| (2)    |                           | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report. |

| /s/ STEVEN D. BONHAM    |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Steven D. Bonham        |
| Chief Financial Officer |

|      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DECEMBER 31,
1998 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          31,298
<SECURITIES>                                     9,614
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,082
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                62,472
<PP&E>                                           5,267
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,020
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  74,815
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,509
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        40,050
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,620
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    74,815
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               112,518
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   62,646
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                44,770
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,649
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,382
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,649
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,649
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.46
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Rory J. Cowan, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Lionbridge Technologies, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for theregistrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared; 

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles; 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: November 9, 2006
* District Judge of the Western District of Louisiana, sitting by

designation.

** Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of opinions that have

no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of wellsettled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens

on the legal profession." Pursuant to that rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________

No. 93-7372

_______________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

JOSE LUIS MARTINEZ

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(CR C-87-109-1)

_________________________

(April 8, 1994)

Before SMITH and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges, and WALTER,* District

Judge.

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:**

Jose Martinez appeals the district court's denial of his

motion to change the post-imprisonment portion of his sentence from

a special parole term to supervised release. Finding no error, we

affirm. 
2

I.

Martinez pleaded guilty in April 1988 to possession with

intent to distribute approximately fifteen kilograms of marihuana,

in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(D). He received

a sentence of four years' confinement, a four-year special parole

term, and a special assessment of $50.

In February 1993, following his release from prison,

Martinez's supervising probation officer issued a probable cause

warrant for Martinez's arrest based upon a belief that Martinez had

violated his parole. Martinez surrendered and was imprisoned in

March 1993 for violating parole.

Martinez moved to correct his sentence, arguing that he should

have received a term of supervised release under § 1002 of the

Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 ("ADAA"), and Gozlon-Peretz v. United

States, 498 U.S. 395 (1991). The district court denied the motion

as the statute under which Martinez was convicted, 21 U.S.C.

§ 841(b)(1)(D), was not governed by § 1002.

II.

Martinez argues that, under the reasoning of Gozlon-Peretz,

§ 1002 designates offenses under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(D) as having

supervised release. We review the motion to correct sentence under

FED. R. CRIM. P. 35 for gross abuse of discretion. United States v.

Hanyard, 762 F.2d 1226, 1228 (5th Cir. 1985).

The issue in this case is not the effective date of § 1002,

see Gozlon-Peretz, 498 U.S. at 409, but whether the offense in this
3

case was designated as an offense requiring supervised release

under § 1002. We conclude that it was not. Section 1002

redesignated § 841(b)(1)(C) as § 841(b)(1)(D) and amended

§ 841(b)(1)(A), (b)(1)(B), and (b)(1)(C) to reflect terms of

supervised release instead of special parole. The special parole

term in § 841(b)(1)(D) remained unaffected until November 1, 1987,

when it was amended by § 1004 of the ADAA. Gozlon-Peretz, 498 U.S.

at 406 n.10. Since Martinez's offense occurred in March 1987, the

district court correctly denied his motion to replace his special

parole term with a term of supervised release.

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 248 (Wednesday, December 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 66966]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31286]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-82-000]


Algonquin Gas Transmission Co.; Notice of Proposed Changes In 
FERC Gas Tariff

December 20, 1995.
    Take notice that on December 14, 1995, Algonquin Gas Transmission 
Company (Algonquin) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Fourth Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheets, with 
a proposed effective date of January 15, 1996:

Twenty-fifth Revised Sheet No. 20A

Original Sheet No. 99E

    Algonquin states that the purpose of this filing is to flow through 
a refund from National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation related to its 
Account Nos. 191 and 186, as filed in National Fuel's Docket No. RP95-
373-002.
    Algonquin states that copies of this filing were mailed to all firm 
customers of Algonquin and interested states commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with 18 CFR 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. Pursuant to Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations, all such motions or protests must be filed not later than 
12 days after the date of the filing noted above. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-31286 Filed 12-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3311 

To amend the Federal Trade Commission Act to establish procedures for 

the treatment of votes by departed Commissioners. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 2, 2021 

Mr. MORAN (for himself, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. THUNE, Mr. LEE, Ms. LUMMIS, 

Mr. JOHNSON, and Mr. CRUZ) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 

Transportation 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Trade Commission Act to establish 

procedures for the treatment of votes by departed Commissioners. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘FTC Integrity Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF VOTES BY DEPARTED FTC COMMIS6 SIONERS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The first section of the Federal 

8 Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 41) is amended by in9 serting before the last sentence the following new sentence: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3311 IS

1 ‘‘Any vote by a Commissioner on a motion before the Com2 mission for which voting has not closed as of the end of 

3 the last day of the Commissioner’s service on the Commis4 sion shall have no effect after such date.’’. 

5 (b) RETROACTIVE EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amend6 ment made by this section shall apply to any vote taken 

7 by a Commissioner on or after January 1, 2021. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS