alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### WILLIE MAE GIBSON REDDICK and Husband, JOHN REDDICK, and HILL GIBSON, v. RALPH U. BUTLER and GLOSTER GIBSON.

(Filed 29 March, 1944.)

Appeal by defendants from *Ervin, Special Judge,*at October Term, 1943, of Caldwell.

*L. II. Wall and Hal B. Adams for defendants, appellants.*

*W. H. Striclcland and Hunter Martin for plaintiffs, appellees.*

Per Curiam.

This case was brought by plaintiffs to have a trust in . their favor declared upon lands formerly belonging to them, but now held by one of the defendants, Butler, under a tax deed, which plaintiffs say was procured through fraud or conspiracy between the defendants while it was the duty of Butler to pay the tax. The defendants demurred to the complaint as not stating a cause of action, and the demurrer was overruled, from which judgment defendants appealed.

The Court is of the opinion that the demurrer was properly overruled. Since no new principles of - law are involved and there is nothing unique in their application discussion of whch would be useful to the profession, we do not deem a formal opinion necessary.

The judgment overruling the demurrer is

Affirmed.
/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 22, 2014

No. 04-13-00593-CV

Venus MINSAL,

Appellant

v.

Abel H. GARCIA,

Appellee

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-CI-18466

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s motion to amend appellant’s brief is GRANTED. Appellee’s motion for an 

extension of time to file his brief is GRANTED. Appellee’s brief is due on July 26, 2014.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of July, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
1 The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 05-1982

___________ Elvin E. Carroll, Sr., * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. National Postal Mail Handlers Union; * International Union of North America, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: March 30, 2006 Filed: March 31, 2006

___________ Before RILEY, MAGILL, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Elvin Carroll appeals the district court’s 1 Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) dismissal of his suit against his union for discrimination and failure to represent him. We affirm. Carroll does not dispute that his suit wa s filed after the relevant limitations periods had run, and we agree with the di strict court that the circumstances Carroll identified did not pr ovide a basis for equitable tolling or equitable estoppel. See-2- Henderson v. Ford Motor Co. , 403 F.3d 1026, 1033 (8th Cir. 2005) (equitable tolling applies when plaintiff “despite all due dilig ence, is unable to obtain vital information bearing on the existence of his claim”; equitable estoppel tolls limitations period when employee knows of claim, but employer affirmatively and actively takes action that causes employee not to timely file suit); see also Dring v. McDonnell Douglas Corp. , 58 F.3d 1323, 1329 (8th Cir. 1995) (equitable estoppel may be invoked where plaintiff is lulled or tricked into letti ng filing deadline pass because of employer misconduct above and beyond wrongdoing upon which plaintiff’s claim is founded); Grant v. McDonnell Douglas Corp. , 163 F.3d 1136, 1138 (9th Cir. 1998) (recognizing that some courts have allowed equitabl e tolling of limitations period based on mental illness for some federal claims, but onl y in exceptional circumstances, such as institutionalization or adjudged mental incompetence of litigant). Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

,

Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the directio n of the Court.

Dec ember 8 , 2020 

# Order

Clerk Dec ember 8 , 2020

148981 ( 80 ) ( 81 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 148981

v COA: 319642

Muskegon CC: 12

- 062665

- FH

PAUL J. BETTS, JR.,

Defendant

- Appellant

.

_________ _____________________________ /

On order of the C hief Justice

, the motion of the Gratiot County Prosecutor to file a

response to the brief amicus curiae of the American Civil Liberties Union of Michigan is

GRANTED. The response submitted on Octo ber 5 , 2020, is accepted for filing

. On further

order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the American Civil Liberties Union of Michigan

to file a supplemental b rief amicus curiae is GRANTED. The supplemental amicus brief

submitted on October 6, 2020, is accepted for filing.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 246 (Friday, December 22, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 66544]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31134]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. QF84-377-006]


Colstrip Energy Limited Partnership; Notice of Application for 
Commission Recertification of Qualifying Status of a Small Power 
Production Facility

December 18, 1995.
    On December 11, 1995, Colstrip Energy Limited Partnership 
(Applicant), of 1087 W. River Street, Suite 200, Boise, Idaho 83702, 
submitted for filing an application for recertification of a facility 
as a qualifying small power production facility pursuant to 
Sec. 292.207(b) of the Commission's Regulations. The instant request 
for recertification is due to the use of an additional type of waste 
coal. No determination has been made that the submittal constitutes a 
complete filing.
    According to Applicant, the small power production facility, which 
is located approximately 7 miles North of the city of Colstrip in 
Rosebud County, Montana, was previously recertified as a qualifying 
cogeneration facility, AEM CORP.--Colstrip Energy Limited Partnership, 
44 FERC para. 62,275 (1988).
    Any person desiring to be heard or objecting to the granting of 
qualifying status should file a motion to intervene or protest with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure. All such motions or protests must be 
filed within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice in 
the Federal Register and must be served on the applicant. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action 
to be taken but will not serve to make protestantS parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a petition 
to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-31134 Filed 12-21-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 21 (Tuesday, February 2, 2016)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 5571]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02084]



[[Page 5569]]

Vol. 81

Tuesday,

No. 21

February 2, 2016

Part III





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Memorandum of January 29, 2016--Delegation of Certain Authority and 
Assignment of Certain Functions Under Section 103(a)(1)(A) and Section 
103(b)(1) of the Bipartisan Congressional Trade Priorities and 
Accountability Act of 2015


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 81 , No. 21 / Tuesday, February 2, 2016 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 5571]]

                Memorandum of January 29, 2016

                
Delegation of Certain Authority and Assignment of 
                Certain Functions Under Section 103(a)(1)(A) and 
                Section 103(b)(1) of the Bipartisan Congressional Trade 
                Priorities and Accountability Act of 2015

                Memorandum for the United States Trade Representative

                In addition to the authorities and functions delegated 
                and assigned to you by Executive Order 13701 of July 
                17, 2015, by the authority vested in me as President by 
                the Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, including section 301 of title 3, United 
                States Code, I hereby delegate to you the authority to 
                enter into trade agreements, reserved to the President 
                in Executive Order 13701, under section 103(a)(1)(A) 
                and section 103(b)(1) of the Bipartisan Congressional 
                Trade Priorities and Accountability Act of 2015 (Public 
                Law 114-26, title I), and assign to you that function.

                You are authorized and directed to publish this 
                memorandum in the Federal Register.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, January 29, 2016

[FR Doc. 2016-02084
Filed 2-1-16; 11:15 am]
Billing code 3190-W1-P
### Proposed Provision: F8. For active S-corporation officers and limited partners, apply a 16.2 percent tax on investment income as defined in the ACA, with unindexed thresholds as in the ACA ($200,000 single filer, $250,000 for married filing joint), starting in 2024. Proceeds go to the OASDI Trust Funds for tax attributable to 12.4 percent of the total 16.2 percent tax rate.

back
#### The Lake Ontario National Bank, Respondent v. David H. Judson, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members         
    -  AEE Multimedia         
    -  AEE Research Library 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# PHOTOS ANDVIDEOS

Search

Search

                                - All Images 
                                - Other 
                                - Space Shuttle 

                                - Upload Date
                                - Photo Date
                                - Title

----

Download Image: Full Size (0.7 MB)

Tags:SPACECOM, posture, Dickinson, Cotton, SASC, STRATCOM

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Financial Statements included in the Company's Form 10-KSB for the year ended
January 2, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Financial
Statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-02-1999
<CASH>                                           1,942
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       68
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,010
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,010
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               86
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,910
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,010
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   571
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (122)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (449)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (449)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (449)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.03)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           9,270
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,445
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (550)
<INVENTORY>                                     15,090
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,948
<PP&E>                                         117,330
<DEPRECIATION>                                  57,386
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 179,633
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           50,506
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                     111,906
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   179,633
<SALES>                                        213,800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               213,800
<CGS>                                          138,630
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  138,630
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,518
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   128
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,353
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 31,620
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,211
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,409
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,409
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.58
        

</TABLE>
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstancesset forth in LocalRule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40194

(Summary Calendar)

RAMON L. PEREZ & EVANGELINA PEREZ,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

WAL-MART STORES, INC., ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(B-94-CV-218)

October 31, 1996

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ramon L. Perez and Evangelina Perez appeal the trial court’s denial of their Motion for New

Trialwhich alleged abuse of discretion by the trial court and materialmisconduct by the jury foreman,

William J. Vaughn. We AFFIRM.
2

This court’s review of a district court’s ruling on a motion for new trial is reviewed only for

an abuse of discretion and the district court is given greater deference when the motion is denied,

leaving the jury’s determination undisturbed. Weaver v. Amoco Production Co., 66 F.3d 85, 88 (5th

Cir. 1995).

In McDonough Power Equipment, Inc., v. Greenwood, 464 U.S. 548 (1984), the Supreme

Court established a two pronged test that governs situations like the case at bar. In the words of the

Court “to obtain a new trial . . . a party must first demonstrate that a juror failed to answer honestly

a material question on voir dire, and then further show that a correct response would have provided

a valid basis for challenge for cause.” Id. At 556. After reviewing the transcript of the voir dire

examination, it is clear that the Appellants have not met their burden.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that appellees’ application forleave tofile amotion for damages

and costs pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 38 is DENIED.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.
### Proposed Provision: E3.7. Increase the taxable maximum by an additional 2 percent per year beginning in 2025 until taxable earnings equal 90 percent of covered earnings. Provide benefit credit for earnings up to the revised taxable maximum. Create a new bend point equal to the current-law taxable maximum with a 5 percent formula factor applying above the new bend point.
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 21 (Tuesday, February 2, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 5484]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-01870]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Cooperative Research Group on CHEDE-VII

    Notice is hereby given that, on January 6, 2016, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Southwest Research 
Institute: Cooperative Research Group on CHEDE-VII (``CHEDE-VII'') has 
filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General 
and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the 
parties to the venture and (2) the nature and objectives of the 
venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the 
Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties 
to the venture are: Borgwarner, Inc., Auburn Hills, MI; Caterpillar 
Inc., Peoria, IL; Cummins, Columbus, IN; Federal-Mogul Corporation, 
Plymouth, MI; Honeywell International, Inc., Torrance, CA; Hyundai 
Motor Group, Seoul, REPUBLIC OF KOREA; Isuzu, Shanghai, PEOPLE'S 
REPUBLIC OF CHINA; Jacobs Vehicle Systems, Bloomfield, CT; Lubrizol 
Corporation, Wickliffe, OH Vandyne Superburbo, Inc., Loveland, CO; and 
Weichai Power Co. Ltd., Weifang, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA. The 
general areas of CHEDE-VII's planned activities are: research activity 
for diesel combustion system improvements; research activity for dual 
fuel combustion system improvements; improved fuel efficiency for 
future diesel and alternative fueled heavy-duty engines; and improved 
emissions for future diesel and alternative fueled engines.

Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2016-01870 Filed 2-1-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                | BIOMODA, INC.                                                                       |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                |                                                                                |   |
| Dated: May 24, 2010 | By:                                                                       | /s/ John J. Cousins                                               |
|                | John J. Cousins                                                                     |
|                | President & Chief Financial Officer(Principal Executive and Accounting Officer) |