alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### JAMES H. NANCE v. KENNETH J. LONG *and*JUDITH P. LONG.

(Filed 8 April, 1959.)

1. Appeal and Error § 42—

Where the charge of the court declares and explains the law arising on all phases of the evidence and 'is without .prejudicial error when considered contextually,, an exception .thereto will not be sustained.

2. Appeal and Error § 46: Trial § 49—

A motion .to set aside the verdict as being contrary to -the weight of the evidence is addressed to the discretion of the trial court, and no appeal lies from .the court’s refusal to grant the motion.

Appeal by plaintiff from *8harp, S. J.,*September Civil Term, 1958, of FORSYTH.

This action was instituted for recovery of -an alleged unpaid balance of indebtedness due plaintiff for labor performed and materials furnished under contract in the construction of a dwelling house for defendants. The defendants denied the alleged indebtedness. The jury returned a verdict favorable to the defendants.

From judgment upon the verdict plaintiff appeals, assigning error.

*97
      *Robert M. Bryant for plaintiff, appellant.*

*Buford T. Henderson.for defendants, appellees.*

Pee CuRiam.

Plaintiff makes two assignments of error: (1) that the charge of the court upon -a phase of the evidence does not comply with the requirements of G.S. 1-180, and (2) that the 'court.erred in denying plaintiff’s motion to set the verdict aside as being contrary to the weight of the evidence. This was :a case for the jury, and the court submitted it upon proper issues. When the .charge of the court is considered eontexual'ly as a whole, as we are required to do, it is clear that the learned Judge declared and explained the law .arising on all .phases of the evidence. *Motor Co. v. Ins. Co.,*220 NC. 168, 16 S.E. 2d 847. The refusal to set aside the verdict as being contrary to the weight of the evidence was a matter within the discretion of the court iand no appeal lies therefrom. *Roberts v. Hill,*240 N.C. 373, 82 S.E. 2d 373.

•No Error.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 242 (Monday, December 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 65068]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30636]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Commercenet Consortium

    Notice is hereby given that, on August 17, 1995, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), CommerceNet 
Consortium, (the ``Consortium'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing certain changes in its membership. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, the identities of 
the additional members at the sponsor level are: Justsystem, Inc., 
Menlo Park, CA; Defense Logistics Agency, U.S. Government, Alexandria, 
VA; and NASA, Federal Government, Moffett Field, CA.
    The following organizations have joined the Consortium as associate 
members: Concurrent Technologies Corporation, Oakland, CA; DigiCash, 
New York, NY; Hamilton Hallmark, Culver City, CA; Online Computer 
Market, Southboro, MA; Hummingbird Software Corporation, Incline 
Village, NV; Golf Web, Saratoga, CA; The Document Center, Belmont, CA; 
Media Circus, New York, NY; InterCom-University of Virginia, Computer 
Science Department, Charlottesville, VA; Sholink Corporation, Mt. View, 
CA; and Tradewinds Technologies Incorporated, Winston-Salem, NC.
    The following organizations have joined as international associate 
members: Justsystem Corporation, Tokushima, JAPAN; British 
Telecommunications, London, UNITED KINGDOM; Toshiba Corporation, Tokyo, 
JAPAN; and Kokusai Denshin Denwa Company, Ltd., Tokyo, JAPAN.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activities of the Consortium. Membership remains open, and the 
Consortium intends to file additional written notifications disclosing 
all changes in membership.
    On June 13, 1994, the Consortium filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Rederal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on August 31, 1994 (59 FR 45012).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 9, 
1995. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on December 5, 1995 (60 FR 62259).
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
FR Doc. 95-30636 Filed 12-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

William Alexander Glass a/k/a * From the 39 th District

Bill Glass, Court of Haskell County,

Trial Court No. 6417

.

Vs. No. 11

- 12

- 00011

- CR * January 30, 2014

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey , J

. (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson , J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is

no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
#### Carl L. Dinsenbacher, Respondent, v Lenore Dowis, Appellant.

[772 NYS2d 532]

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Kitson, J.), dated March 18, 2003, as denied her motion for leave to serve an amended answer to add a counterclaim and to strike the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3126 (3).

Ordered that the order is modified, on the facts, by deleting the provision thereof denying that branch of the motion which was for leave to serve an amended answer and substituting therefor a provision granting that branch of the motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Leave to a amend a pleading should be freely given *(see*CPLR 3025 [b]). Although the determination of whether to grant leave is generally within the discretion of the Supreme Court, in this case, the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the defendant’s motion *(see Levine v Levine,*286 AD2d 423 [2001]). Under the circumstances of this case, the fact that the defendant waited for some period of time after the commencement of the divorce action to seek leave to amend her answer to include a counterclaim seeking a declaration that the marriage was void did not justify the denial of that branch of the motion *(see Lechtrecker v Lechtrecker,*176 AD2d 284 [1991]; *Brandt v Brandt,*149 AD2d 646 [1989]; *Merino v Merino,*55 Misc 2d 1098 [1968]).

*348The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Florio, J.P., Krausman, Schmidt and Townes, JJ., concur.
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7566]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3119]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

Open Meeting; Conference on Criteria for National Fallen 
Firefighters' Memorial

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice of Open Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Fire Administration (USFA) is conducting a 
meeting to review the criteria to determine eligibility for inclusion 
in the National Fallen Firefighters' Memorial. Representatives from 
federal agencies and fire service organizations have been invited to 
attend.

Name: Conference on Criteria for National Fallen Firefighters' 
Memorial.

Date of Meeting: February 24, 1995.

Time: 9:00 AM-5:00 PM.

Place: National Emergency Training Center, Building N, Room 309, 
Emmitsburg, Maryland.

Proposed Agenda: AM--Welcome and Introductions of participants; 
overview of current programs in this area; large group discussion. PM--
Workgroups; Large group session to develop summary.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: USFA has the responsibility under the 
Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. 2201 et 
seq., for the ongoing operation of the National Fallen Firefighters' 
Memorial, which is located on the campus of the National Fire Academy 
at Emmitsburg, Maryland. The principal activity associated with the 
Memorial is the annual Fallen Firefighters' Memorial Service. Working 
with the help of interested fire service organizations, USFA 
established formal criteria with which fire service personnel are 
identified for inclusion in the Memorial and the Memorial Service. The 
purpose of the February 24 meeting is to review those criteria.
    The meeting will be open to the public with seating available on a 
first-come, first-serve basis. Members of the general public who plan 
to attend the meeting should contact the Office of Program Coordination 
and Data Analysis, United States Fire Administration, 16825 South Seton 
Avenue, Emmitsburg, MD 21727, or telephone (301)447-1350, by February 
15, 1995.

    Dated: February 2, 1995.
Carrye B. Brown,
U.S. Fire Administrator.
[FR Doc. 95-3119 Filed 2-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-26-P
```
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 and Rule 15d-14**

**of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934**

 

I, Brian T. McGee, certify that: 

 

1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Lexar Media, Inc.; 

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.    The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

(a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c)    disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and; 

 

5.    The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a)    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b)    any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# PHOTOS ANDVIDEOS

Search

Search

                                - All Images 
                                - Other 
                                - Space Shuttle 

                                - Upload Date
                                - Photo Date
                                - Title

----

Download Image: Full Size (1.92 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
#### Precision Mechanical, Inc., Appellant, v Dormitory Authority of the State of New York, Respondent.

[774 NYS2d 734]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jackson, J.), dated November 20, 2002, which, upon granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, dismissed the complaint, and denied its cross motion for partial summary judgment on the cause of action alleging breach of contract.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

After a public bidding, the defendant awarded a contract to the plaintiff, pursuant to which it was to furnish labor and materials in connection with heating, ventilating, and air conditioning work to be performed for the Brooklyn College Library expansion. Approximately three months later, the defendant informed the plaintiff by letter of its intent to terminate the contract for cause. Approximately one month thereafter, the plaintiff signed a separation agreement (hereinafter the agreement) pursuant to which the contract was terminated. The agreement contained a mutual release clause.

The plaintiff commenced this action alleging, among other *654things, breach of contract and wrongful termination. The defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the causes of action were barred by the release. The plaintiff cross moved for partial summary judgment on the cause of action alleging breach of contract.

Contrary to the plaintiffs contention, the agreement was not a contract of adhesion. “Adhesion is found where the party seeking to enforce the contract use[s] high pressure tactics or deceptive language in the contract and where there is inequality of bargaining power between the parties ... In addition, it must be shown that the contract inflicts substantive unfairness on the weaker party” *(Matter of Ball [SFX Broadcasting],*236 AD2d 158,161 [1997]). The agreement was not a standardized contract, ánd the plaintiff was represented by counsel who reviewed and helped negotiate its terms. Further, the plaintiff failed to show that the agreement was unfair.

Nor was the agreement invalid due to economic duress as “[a] threat to do that which one has the right to do does not constitute duress” *(Faillace v Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.,*130 AD2d 34, 42 [1987] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and denied the plaintiff’s cross motion for partial summary judgment on the cause of action alleging breach of contract. Ritter, J.P., S. Miller, Goldstein and Adams, JJ., concur.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Carlos Omar Casillas aka Carlos Omar Casillas Padilla, Appellant

No. 06

- 17

- 00154

- CR v.
The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 8th District Court of Hopkins County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No

. 1725965 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affir m the judgment of the trial court

. We note that the appellant, Carlos Omar Casillas aka Carlos Omar Casillas Padilla, has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED NOVEMBER 8, 2017 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Skip to main content

# Social Security

Search
Menu
Español
Sign in

## Single-Year Tables Consistent With 2012 OASDI Trustees Report

2012 OASDI Trustees Report

      The tables listed below provide estimates by      alternative economic and/or demographic assumptions.      For some of the tables, we also provide historical data.      With one exception, the tables carry the same      designation as in the published report.      Reference should be made to the report      to understand the context in which the estimates are presented.      

 

Questions?   Address Questions about these tables to     actuary@ssa.gov

Footer menu
## Change in Name Popularity

- Background information
- Popular names by State
- Popular names by decade
- Change in Popularity

                The table below summarizes data from our pages showing the change in popularity from 2022 to 2023. In the table, the smallest change in rank (0 to 4) has the lowest average rank in 2023.  Generally, the more popular a name, the smaller the change in popularity.              

**Number of names and average rank, by change in rank and by sex**
| For each year, rank 1 indicates the most popular name, rank 2 the next most      popular, and so forth.  We compared ranks for both years only if a name was in the      top 1000 in at least one of the 2 years. |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
**Exhibit 8.1**

**LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF BRITANNIABULK PLC**
| **Name**                         | ** ** | **Jurisdiction**  |
|----------------------------------|------------|-------------------|
| Britannia Bulkers Plc            |       | England and Wales |
| BBL Denmark Holding A/S          |       | Denmark           |
| Britannia Bulkers A/S            |       | Denmark           |
| Britannia Bulk DK A/S            |       | Denmark           |
| Svendborg Ship Management A/S    |       | Denmark           |
| Svendborg Marine Surveyors A/S   |       | Denmark           |
| Britannia Bulk S.A.              |       | Panama            |
| Danmar Shipping S.A.             |       | Panama            |
| Flagship Maritime S.A.           |       | Panama            |
| Northern Star Navigation S.A.    |       | Panama            |
| Baltic Navigation Company S.A.   |       | Panama            |
| Great Belt Shipping Company S.A. |       | Panama            |
| International Bulk Services S.A. |       | Panama            |
| Unity Bulk Services S.A.         |       | Panama            |
| Channel Bulk Services S.A.       |       | Panama            |
| Western Bulk Services S.A.       |       | Panama            |
| Atlantic Bulk Services S.A.      |       | Panama            |
| Navigator Bulk Services S.A.     |       | Panama            |
| Inspecciones Maritimas S.A.      |       | Costa Rica        |

 

----
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

Search
Search

Search
                    - 
                    - 
                    - 
                    - 
                    - 

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission             
  -  Warfighting Units             
  -  Frequently Asked Questions             
  -  Strategic Vision             
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander             
  -  Deputy Commander             
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader             
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General             
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request             
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator             
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate             
  -  Command Chaplain             
  -  Commandant             
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos             
  -  Speeches             
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest             
    -  AEE Members 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians             
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information             
  -  Checking In