alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip to main content

# Social Security

Search
Menu
Español
Sign in

## 2012 OASDI Trustees Report

Office of the Chief Actuary

Actuarial Publications

2012 Trustees Report   Contents   Tables   FiguresFigures	II. OVERVIEWII.D1	Short-Range OASDI Trust Fund RatioII.D2	OASDI Income, Cost, and Expenditures as Percentages of Taxable PayrollII.D3	Number of Covered Workers Per OASDI BeneficiaryII.D4	OASDI Cost and Non-interest Income as a Percentage of GDPII.D5	Cumulative Scheduled OASDI Income Less Cost,From Program Inception Through Years 2011-86II.D6	Long-Range OASDI Trust Fund Ratios Under Alternative ScenariosII.D7	Long-Range OASDI Trust Fund Ratios From Stochastic ModelingII.D8	OASDI Annual Balances: 2011 and 2012 Trustees Reports	IV. ACTUARIAL ESTIMATESIV.A1	Short-Range OASI and DI Trust Fund RatiosIV.B1	Long-Range OASI and DI Annual Income Rates and Cost RatesIV.B2	Number of OASDI Beneficiaries Per 100 Covered WorkersIV.B3	Long-Range OASI and DI Trust Fund RatiosIV.B4	Test of Long-Range Close Actuarial BalanceIV.B5	OASDI Annual Balances: 2011 and 2012 Trustees Reports	V. ASSUMPTIONS AND METHODS UNDERLYINGACTUARIAL ESTIMATESV.C1	Primary-Insurance-Amount Formula for Those Newly Eligible in 2012V.C2	Maximum-Family-Benefit Formula for Those Newly Eligible in 2012V.C3	DI Disability Incidence Rates, 1970-2090V.C4	DI Disability Termination Rates, 1970-2090V.C5	Comparison of DI Disability Incidence Rates, Termination Rates and Conversion Ratios Under Intermediate Assumptions, 1970-2090V.C6	DI Disability Prevalence Rates, 1970-2090	VI. APPENDICESVI.E1	Long-Range OASDI Cost Rates From Stochastic ModelingVI.E2	Long-Range OASDI Trust Fund Ratios From Stochastic ModelingVI.E3	OASDI Cost Rates: Comparison of Stochastic to Low-Cost, Intermediate, and High-Cost AlternativesVI.E4	OASDI Trust Fund (Unfunded Obligation) Ratios: Comparison of Stochastic to Low-Cost, Intermediate, and High-Cost AlternativesVI.F1	Estimated OASDI Income and Cost in CPI-indexed 2012 Dollars,Based on Intermediate Assumptions	Footer menu
<PAGE>




The Board of Directors
SBS Technologies, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.'s
333-23053 and 333-98558) on Form S-8 and (No. 333-20129) on Form S-3 of SBS
Technologies, Inc. of our report dated August 6, 1997, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of SBS Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of
June 30, 1997, and 1996, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three year period ending June 30, 1997, which report appears in the June 30,
1997, annual report on Form 10-K of SBS Technologies, Inc..


                                       /S/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP


Albuquerque, New Mexico
September 26, 1997
## Detailed Single Year Tables

- Individual Provisions
- Cost-of-Living Adjustment

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						A7: Starting December 2024, reduce the annual COLA by 1 percentage point, but not to less than zero. In cases where the unreduced COLA is less than 1 percentage point, do not carry over the unused reduction into future years.**

### Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program

### Summarized Estimates
EXHIBIT 23
CONSENT OF CLIFTON GUNDERSON LLP
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the prospectuses constituting part ofthe registration statements on Form S-3 for the CSB Bancorp, Inc. Share Owner DividendReinvestment Plan and on Form S-8 for The Commercial & Savings Bank of Millersburg ProfitSharing and 401(k) Savings Retirement Plan and Trust of our report dated January 27, 2005 onthe consolidated balance sheets of CSB Bancorp, Inc. as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 andthe related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for eachof the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004, which report is incorporated byreference in this Form 10-K.      /s/ CLIFTON GUNDERSON LLP      CLIFTON GUNDERSON LLP
Toledo, Ohio
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7747
ATARAH MCQUINN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DAVID E. BOONE, Esq., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:07-cv-00465-REP) Submitted: May 29, 2008 Decided: June 4, 2008 Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Atarah McQuinn, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Atarah McQuinn appeals the district court’s order dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000) her complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. McQuinn v. Boone , No. 3:07-cv-00465-REP (E.D. Va. Nov. 13, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Detailed Single Year TablesUpdated May 3, 2006   |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|

| Cost-of-Living Adjustment | Description of Proposed Provision:      Beginning December 2006, use the superlative (or chained) CPI for COLAs, estimated to reduce the COLA by 0.22 percentage point |
|---------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                           |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions      of the 2005 Trustees Report*

       Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program                Percentage of taxable payroll           Trust fundratio as ofJanuary 1CalendaryearCostrateIncomerateAnnualbalance 200511.1312.721.59 320200611.0012.731.73 337200710.9312.741.82 356200810.9512.781.84 372200911.0612.771.71 385201011.1712.791.62 398201111.3212.841.52 409201211.5512.871.32 417201311.7912.901.11 423201412.0512.910.86 427201512.3112.930.62 429201612.5912.950.36 429201712.8812.970.09 427201813.1712.98-0.19 424201913.4613.00-0.46 419202013.7713.02-0.75 413202114.0713.04-1.03 405202214.3613.06-1.30 396202314.6513.07-1.57 385202414.9313.09-1.84 374202515.2113.11-2.10 361202615.4813.12-2.36 347202715.7313.14-2.59 332202815.9613.15-2.80 317202916.1513.17-2.99 301203016.3413.18-3.16 284203116.5113.19-3.31 267203216.6513.20-3.45 249203316.7613.21-3.55 231203416.8513.22-3.63 212203516.9213.22-3.70 193203616.9713.23-3.74 174203717.0113.23-3.78 155203817.0313.23-3.79 135203917.0313.24-3.79 115204017.0313.24-3.80 95204117.0413.24-3.80 74204217.0413.24-3.80 53204317.0413.24-3.80 32204417.0413.24-3.80 11204517.0513.24-3.81 ----204617.0613.25-3.82 ----204717.0813.25-3.83 ----204817.0913.25-3.84 ----204917.1113.25-3.86 ----205017.1413.25-3.88 ----205117.1713.26-3.91 ----205217.2113.26-3.95 ----205317.2513.26-3.98 ----205417.2913.27-4.02 ----205517.3313.27-4.06 ----205617.3813.27-4.11 ----205717.4313.28-4.16 ----205817.4813.28-4.20 ----205917.5313.28-4.25 ----206017.5813.29-4.30 ----206117.6413.29-4.34 ----206217.6913.29-4.40 ----206317.7513.30-4.45 ----206417.8113.30-4.51 ----206517.8613.30-4.56 ----206617.9213.31-4.61 ----206717.9813.31-4.66 ----206818.0313.32-4.71 ----206918.0813.32-4.76 ----207018.1213.32-4.80 ----207118.1713.32-4.84 ----207218.2113.33-4.88 ----207318.2513.33-4.92 ----207418.2913.33-4.96 ----207518.3313.33-5.00 ----207618.3813.34-5.04 ----207718.4213.34-5.08 ----207818.4613.34-5.12 ----207918.5013.34-5.16 ----208018.5513.35-5.20 ----Summarized RatesYearsCostrateIncomerateActuarialbalance         Change inactuarialbalance2005-207915.43%13.85%-1.57%0.34% Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map
Mrs. Bess Blackwell 

Executive Secretary 

Board of Hairdressers 

and Cosmetologists 

Austin, Texas 

Opinion No. V-753 

Re: The eligibility of one who 

has been convicted of a 

federal felony and served 

a sentence in the federal 

penitentiary to be licensed 

to operate, a beauty school’ 

in Texas. 

Dear Mrs. Blackwell: 

Your request for an opinion is in part as follows: 

“This Board respectfully requests an opinion of your department as to whether or not under 

the Texas Beauty Culture Law a person’who has 

served a sentence in the federal penitentiary is 

eligible to own and operate a beauty school in the 

State of Texas.” 

Section 17 of Article 734b. V.P.C., provides in part 

as follows: 

“The Board may either refuse to issue or 

to renew, or may suspend, or revoke,. any certificate of registration or license, . . . for any one or 

combination of the following causes: 

“(a) Conviction of a felony shown by a certified copy of the record of the trial wherein the 

conviction was held; . . .” 

The rule of statutory construction applicable to 

your request is found in 39 Tex. Jur. 37. which is as follows: 

L 
270 

Mrs. Bess Blackwell, Page 2 (V-753) 

“On the other hand, ‘may’ ordinarily connotes 

discretion or permission: and it will not be treated 

as a word of command unless there is something in 

the context or subject-matter of the act to indicate 

that it was used in that sense.” 

The language used in Section 17, Article 734b connotes 

discretion or permissiou on the part of the Board, and we find 

nothing in the context of the Act which would indicate that the 

Legislature intended the Act to be mandatory. Therefore, you 

are advised that under the plain provisions of Article 734b. in the 

case of a person who has been convicted of a felony, it is left 

solely to the discretion of the Board under Section 17 as to whey 

ther it will issue’or refuse to issue a license because of the conviction. Attorney General’s Cpinion No. O-2359 is hereby overruled. 

SUMMARY 

Whether the Board of Hairdressers and Cosmetologiste will issue or refu6e to issue a license 

to operate a beauty school in Texas to a person 

convicted of a felony is left to the discretion of the 

Board. Section 17 of Article 734b. V.P.C. 

Yours very truly. 

ATTORNEY GENERALOF TEXAS 

By A?Ikee? 

Assistant 

JR:bh:sl 

APPROVED: 

g&i!&2 

ATTORNEYGENERAL
71933545.1 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

In re: 

Pacific Gas & Electric Corp., et al.

Debtors. 

Chapter 11 

Case No. 19-30088 Chapter 11

(Jointly Administered) 

PARTIAL TRANSFER OF CLAIM OTHER THAN FOR SECURITY 

A CLAIM HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS CASE or deemed filed under 11 U.S.C. § 

1111(a). Transferee hereby gives evidence and notice pursuant to Rule 3001(e)(2) of the Federal 

Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure of the transfer, other than for security, of the claim referenced in 

this evidence and notice. 

Jim Norman’s Trees Unlimited, Inc. 

Name of Transferor 

Phone: (530) 271-5536 

Last Four Digits of Acct #: N/A 

Name and Address where notices and 

payments to transferee should be sent: 

Whitebox Relative Value Partners, LP 

c/o Whitebox Advisors 

3033 Excelsior Blvd, Suite 300 

Minneapolis, MN 55416-4675 

Attn: Scott Specken 

Whitebox Relative Value Partners, LP 

Name of Transferee 

Phone: (612) 253-6061 

Last Four Digits of Acct #: N/A 

Claim No: 8095 

Debtor: Pacific Gas and Electric Company 

(19-30089) 

Date Filed: August 29, 2019 

Total Amount of Claim: $961,959.40 

Transferred Amount of Claim: 

$961,959.40 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the information provided in this notice is true and correct 

to the best of my knowledge and belief. 

By: _____________________________________ Date:__________________________ 

Transferee/Transferee’s Agent 

Penalty for making a false statement: Fine of up to $500,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years, 

or both. 18 U.S.C. 152 & 3571.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 9D71E381-D579-4F04-96DA-742AA7A86798

1/8/2020 | 15:49 PST

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5313 Filed: 01/08/20 Entered: 01/08/20 16:19:56 Page 1 of

2
100

DocuSign Envelope ID: E339CAA4-1B66-4DA3-8270-B45E32DA005C

Mark Strefling

Partner & CEO

DocuSign Envelope ID: 9D71E381-D579-4F04-96DA-742AA7A86798

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5313 Filed: 01/08/20 Entered: 01/08/20 16:19:56 Page 2 of

2
**RB** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20 - 0607 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ROBERT LARRY WOOD ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**GRANT OF EXTENSION** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is gran ted an extension of time to and including February 6 , 202 2 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court January 4 2022

01/04/2022

Case Number: DA 20-0607
### Proposed Provision: B2.1. Beginning with those newly eligible for OASI benefits in 2033, multiply the PIA factors by the ratio of life expectancy at 67 for 2028 to the life expectancy at age 67 for the 4th year prior to the year of benefit eligibility. Unisex life expectancies, based on period life tables as computed by SSA's Office of the Chief Actuary, are used to determine the ratio. Disabled workers are: (a) not affected prior to normal retirement age; and (b) subject to a proportional reduction in benefits, based on the worker's years of disability, upon conversion to retired-worker beneficiary status.
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 245 (Thursday, December 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66255-66256]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31071]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Maryland Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the 

[[Page 66256]]
Maryland Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 10:00 
a.m. and adjourn at 4:00 p.m. on Thursday, January 25, 1996, at the 
Omni Hotel, 101 W. Fayette Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21201. The 
purpose of the meeting is to choose a project topic and plan a project 
for fiscal year 1996.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Committee Chairperson Dr. Chester L. 
Wickwire, 410-825-8949, or Edward Darden, Acting Director of the 
Eastern Regional Office, 202-376-7533 (TDD 202-376-8116). Hearing-
impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services 
of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at 
least five (5) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, December 14, 1995.
Carol-Lee Hurley,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 95-31071 Filed 12-20-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5583 

To provide for the treatment and extension of temporary financing of shorttime compensation programs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 

Ms. DELAURO (for herself and Mr. CONYERS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To provide for the treatment and extension of temporary 

financing of short-time compensation programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Layoff Prevention Ex5 tension Act of 2014’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5583 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY FINANCING OF SHORT2 TIME COMPENSATION PAYMENTS IN STATES 

3 WITH PROGRAMS IN LAW. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2162(b) of the Middle 

5 Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 (26 U.S.C. 

6 3304 note) is amended— 

7 (1) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking ‘‘3 years’’ 

8 and inserting ‘‘4 years’’; and 

9 (2) in paragraph (2)— 

10 (A) in the heading, by striking ‘‘THREE11 YEAR’’ and inserting ‘‘FOUR-YEAR’’; and 

12 (B) by striking ‘‘156 weeks’’ and inserting 

13 ‘‘208 weeks’’. 

14 (b) TECHNICAL CORRECTION.—Section 3306(v)(6) of 

15 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 3306) is 

16 amended by inserting ‘‘or the Workforce Innovation and 

17 Opportunity Act’’ after ‘‘1998’’. 

18 SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR SUBMITTING AN AP19 PLICATION FOR GRANTS FOR SHORT-TIME 

20 COMPENSATION PROGRAMS. 

21 Section 2164(c)(1) of the Middle Class Tax Relief 

22 and Job Creation Act of 2012 (26 U.S.C. 3304 note) is 

23 amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2014’’ and inserting 

24 ‘‘December 31, 2015’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 27 (Thursday, February 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7760]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3187]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP95-149-000]


ANR Pipeline Co.; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

February 3, 1995.
    Take notice that on January 31, 1995, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR), 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised 
Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, with a proposed effective 
date of February 1, 1995:

Fifth Revised Sheet No. 8
Seventh Revised Sheet No. 9
Seventh Revised Sheet No. 13
Seventh Revised Sheet No. 16
Seventh Revised Sheet No. 18

    ANR states that the above-referenced tariff sheets are being filed 
to commence recovery of approximately $22.2 million of pricing 
differential (PD) costs that have been incurred by ANR as a result of 
the implementation of Order Nos. 636, et seq. ANR proposes a 
reservation fee surcharge applicable to its Part 284 firm 
transportation customers to recover ninety percent (90%) of the PD 
costs, and an adjustment to the maximum base tariff rates applicable to 
Rate Schedule ITS and overrun service rendered pursuant to Rate 
Schedule FTS-2, so as to recover the remaining ten percent (10%).
    ANR states that all of its Volume No. 1 FERC Gas Tariff customers 
and interested State Commissions have been mailed a copy of this 
filing.
    Any person desiring to be heard to protest said filing should file 
a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20426 in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions or 
protests should be filed on or before February 10, 1995. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action 
to be taken, but will not serve to make protestant parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of the application are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-3187 Filed 2-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov |  | **Search**  |
|------------------------|--|------------------|

| Office of the Chief Actuary | Provisions That Could Change the Social Security Program |
|-----------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7551

GREGORY K. CLINTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ELIZABETH D. GRANT, In her individual capacity; UNITED STATES OF 

AMERICA,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at 

Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:20-cv-00178-GMG-RWT)

Submitted: December 22, 2020 Decided: December 29, 2020

Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory K. Clinton, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Gregory K. Clinton filed the underlying civil action pursuant to Bivens v. Six 

Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Clinton seeks 

to appeal the district court’s order overruling his objections to the magistrate judge’s order 

denying Clinton’s motion to appoint counsel. This court may exercise jurisdiction only 

over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 

U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 

545-46 (1949). The order Clinton seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable 

interlocutory or collateral order. Miller v. Simmons, 814 F.2d 962, 967 (4th Cir. 1987). 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Clinton’s motions to 

amend and for recusal and deny as moot his motion to expedite and for release pending 

resolution of this appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 250 (Friday, December 29, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 67362]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31403]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION
[Finance Docket No. 32831]


Burlington Northern Railroad Company--Trackage Rights Exemption--
Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company

    Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company (IHB) has granted 9.8 miles of 
overhead trackage rights to Burlington Northern Railroad Company (BN), 
between IHB's connection with BN at milepost 31.0, in LaGrange, IL, and 
IHB's connection with Norfolk Southern Railway Company at milepost 
21.2, in Chicago Ridge, IL. The transaction was scheduled to be 
consummated on December 18, 1995.
    This notice is filed under 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(7). If the notice 
contains false or misleading information, the exemption is void ab 
initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10505(d) may 
be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke will not 
automatically stay the transaction. Pleadings must be filed with the 
Commission <SUP>1 and served on: Michael E. Roper, Associate General 
Counsel, Burlington Northern Railroad Company, 3800 Continental Plaza, 
777 Main Street, Fort Worth, TX 76102-5384.

    \1\ Legislation to sunset the Commission on December 31, 1995, 
and transfer remaining functions is now under consideration in 
Congress. Until further notice, parties submitting pleadings should 
continue to use the current name and address: Interstate Commerce 
Commission, 1201 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20423.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As a condition to the use of this exemption, any employees 
adversely affected by the trackage rights will be protected under 
Norfolk and Western Ry. Co.--Trackage Rights--BN, 354 I.C.C. 605 
(1978), as modified in Mendocino Coast Ry., Inc.--Lease and Operate, 
360 I.C.C. 653 (1980).

    Decided: December 18, 1995.

    By the Commission, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-31403 Filed 12-28-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7035-01-P