7782 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 27 / Thursday, February 9, 1995 / Notices

To review individual grant applications.

Name of SEP: Clinical Sciences.

Date: February 21, 1995.

Time: 2:00 p.m.

Place: Holiday Inn Oldtown, Alexandria, VA.

Contact Person: Dr. Josephine Pelham,

Scientific Review Admin., 5333 Westbard

Ave., Room 349, Bethesda, MD 20892,

(301) 594–7254.

Name of SEP: Biological and Physiological

Sciences.

Date: March 9, 1995.

Time: 1:30 p.m.

Place: NIH, Westwood Building, Room 418A,

Telephone Conference.

Contact Person: Dr. Anne Clark, Scientific

Review Administrator, 5333 Westbard

Ave., Room 418A, Bethesda, MD 20892,

(301) 594–7115.

Name of SEP: Behavioral and Neurosciences.

Date: March 6, 1995.

Time: 8:30 a.m.

Place: Holiday Inn, Chevy Chase, MD.

Contact Person: Dr. Jane Hu, Scientific

Review Administrator, 5333 Westbard

Ave., Room 309, Bethesda, MD 20892,

(301) 594–7269.

Name of SEP: Behavioral and Neurosciences.

Date: March 10, 1995.

Time: 9:00 a.m.

Place: Holiday Inn, Chevy Chase, MD.

Contact Person: Dr. Jane Hu, Scientific

Review Administrator, 5333 Westbard

Ave., Room 309, Bethesda, MD 20892,

(301) 594–7269.

Purpose/Agenda

To review Small Business Innovation

Research Program grant applications.

Name of SEP: Multidisciplinary Sciences.

Date: March 16–17, 1995.

Time: 8:30 a.m.

Place: Holiday Inn, Chevy Chase, MD.

Contact Person, Dr. John Mathis, Scientific

Review Administrator, 5333 Westbard

Ave., Room 2A10A, Bethesda, MD 20892,

(301) 594–7243.

The meetings will be closed in accordance

with the provisions set forth in sec.

552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C.

Applications and/or proposals and the

discussions could reveal confidential trade

secrets or commercial property such as

patentable material and personal information

concerning individuals associated with the

applications and/or proposals, the disclosure

of which would constitute a clearly

unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

This notice is being published less than 15

days prior to the meeting due to the urgent

need to meet timing limitations imposed by

the grant review cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance

Program Nos. 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393–

93.396, 93.837–93.844, 93.846–93.878,

93.892, 93.893, National Institute of Health,

HHS)

Dated: February 3, 1995.

Susan K. Feldman,

Committee Management Officer, NIH.

[FR Doc. 95–3181 Filed 2–8–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140–01–M

Social Security Administration

Rescission of Social Security

Acquiescence Ruling 87–3(9)

AGENCY: Social Security Administration,

HHS.

ACTION: Notice of rescission of Social

Security Acquiescence Ruling 87–3(9)-

Hart v. Bowen, 799 F.2d 567 (9th Cir.

1986).

SUMMARY: In accordance with 20 CFR

416.1485(e) and 422.406(b)(2), the

Commissioner of Social Security gives

notice of the rescission of Social

Security Acquiescence Ruling 87–3(9).

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 9, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary

Sargent, Litigation Staff, Social Security

Administration, 6401 Security Blvd.,

Baltimore, MD 21235, (410) 965–1695.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A Social

Security Acquiescence Ruling explains

how we will apply a holding in a

decision of a United States Court of

Appeals that we determine conflicts

with our interpretation of a provision of

the Social Security Act or regulations

when the Government has decided not

to seek further review of the case or is

unsuccessful on further review.

As provided by 20 CFR

416.1485(e)(4), a Social Security

Acquiescence Ruling may be rescinded

as obsolete if we subsequently clarify,

modify or revoke the regulation or

ruling that was the subject of the circuit

court holding for which the

Acquiescence Ruling was issued.

On May 6, 1987, we issued

Acquiescence Ruling 87–3(9) to reflect

the holding in Hart v. Bowen, 799 F.2d

567 (9th Cir. 1986), that the current

market value of an installment sales

contract resulting from the sale of an

individual’s excluded home is part of

the value of the replacement home and

thus excluded from countable resources

for Supplemental Security Income (SSI)

purposes, provided the payments

generated by the installment sales

contract were reinvested in the

excluded replacement home within

three months of receipt of the payments.

On August 23, 1994, we published

our final regulation (59 FR 43283),

revising section 416.1212 of Social

Security Regulations No. 16 (20 CFR

416.1212), to clarify when the proceeds

from the sale of an excluded home,

including the value of a promissory note

or similar installment sales contract and

other proceeds from the sale (the

downpayment and monthly installment

payments toward the principal), will be

excluded from being considered SSI

resources. Because this regulation

addresses the Hart court’s concerns and

contains a thorough explanation

concerning how we treat proceeds from

the sale of an excluded home, we are

rescinding Acquiescence Ruling

87–3(9).

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance

Programs No. 93.807 Supplemental Security

Income.)

Dated: February 1, 1995.

Shirley S. Chater,

Commissioner of Social Security.

[FR Doc. 95–3240 Filed 2–8–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4190–29–P

Rescission of Social Security Ruling

(SSR) 80–36, Title XVI: Presumptive

Disability and Presumptive Blindness

Provision

AGENCY: Social Security Administration,

HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The Commissioner of Social

Security gives notice of the rescission of

SSR 80–36.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 9, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Joanne K. Castello, Division of

Regulations and Rulings, Social Security

Administration, 6401 Security

Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235, (410)

965–1711.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Social

Security Rulings make available to the

public precedential decisions relating to

the Federal old-age, survivors,

disability, supplemental security

income, and black lung benefits

programs. Social Security Rulings may

be based on case decisions made at all

administrative levels of adjudication,

Federal court decisions, Commissioner’s

decisions, opinions of the Office of the

General Counsel, and other policy

interpretations of the law and

regulations.

SSR 80–36, issued in 1980, was

published in the 1976–1980 Cumulative

Edition of the Rulings on page 482. SSR

80–36 established procedures

concerning the types of impairments

subject to findings of presumptive