alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Washington Banking Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Richard A. Shields, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company
     as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.

This certification is being furnished solely to comply with the requirements of
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any of
the Company's filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise be deemed to be filed as part of the Report
or under such Acts.


/s/ Richard A. Shields
-------------------------------------
Richard A. Shields
Chief Financial Officer

November 8, 2006
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, James S. Murphy, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Hypertension Diagnostics, Inc.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
Date: May 13, 2005                                                       /s/ James S. Murphy   James S. Murphy   Chief Financial Officer  
23
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                SAVWATT USA, INC.
                             A Delaware Corporation

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the Annual Report of SavWatt USA, Inc.  ("Company")  on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof  (the  "Report"),  I, Isaac H.  Sutton,
President and Chief Financial Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: August 17, 2010               /s/  Isaac H. Sutton
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     By: Isaac H. Sutton
                                     Its: President and Chief Financial Officer
                                          (Principal Executive Officer)
                                          (Principal Financial Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-9941-89-OA]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Notice.

                    Notice is hereby given that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has determined that, in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. App. 2, the Farm, Ranch, and Rural Communities Advisory Committee (FRRCC) is a necessary committee which is in the public interest. Accordingly, the FRRCC will be renewed for an additional two-year period. The purpose of the FRRCC is to provide advice and recommendations to the EPA Administrator on environmental issues and policies that are of importance to agriculture and rural communities. Inquiries may be directed to Donna Perla, Designated Federal Officer for FRRCC, U.S. EPA (Mail Code 8101R), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460, or                     *perla.donna@epa.gov.*

Dated: January 11, 2016.

Ron Carleton,

Agricultural Counselor to the Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 2016-01995 Filed 2-2-16; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
## Detailed Single Year Tables

- Individual Provisions
- Level of Monthly Benefits

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						B5.1: Increase the PIA to a level such that a worker with 30 years of earnings at the minimum wage level receives an adjusted PIA equal to 120 percent of the Federal poverty level for an aged individual. This provision takes full effect for all newly eligible OASDI workers in 2041, and is phased in for new eligibles in 2032 through 2040. The percentage increase in PIA is lowered proportionately for those with fewer than 30 years of earnings, down to no enhancement for workers with 20 or fewer years of earnings. (Year-of-work requirements are "scaled" for disabled workers based on their years of potential work from age 22 to benefit eligibility). The benefit enhancement percentage is reduced proportionately for workers with higher average indexed monthly earnings (AIME), down to no enhancement for those with AIME at least twice that of a 35-year steady minimum wage earner.**

### Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program

### Summarized Estimates
WILLIE MAE THORNTON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-4248

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 7, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Gary L. Bergosh, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Megan Lynne Long, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Robert Charles Lee, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., WETHERELL and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 35

ITEM 1123 CERTIFICATION

I, David Duclos,
Vice President of U.S. Bank National Association (the Servicer), hereby certify that:

(1) A review of the activities of the Servicer during
the fiscal year covered by this annual report on Form 10-K and of the performance of the Servicer under the Standard Terms for Trust Agreement, dated as of November 9, 2006, between the Servicer and the depositor (the Agreement) has
been made under my supervision;

and

(2) To the best of my
knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period, or, if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, I
have specified below each such failure known to me and the nature and status thereof.

Date: March 30, 2015



|                
|----------------
|/s/ David Duclos
|David Duclos    
|Vice President
#### William B. Bushnell v. The Consolidated Ice Machine Company et al.

Corporations—Dissolution—Jurisdiction.

1. An appeal in a controversy involving a franchise must be taken to the Supreme Court.

2. A franchise is as much involved when the relief sought is to enjoin a company from acting as a corporation, as when it is sought to enjoin the incorporation of a company by a given name.

3. This court sustains an order dismissing an appeal in the case presented, on the ground that it has no jurisdiction thereof.

[Opinion filed June 2, 1890.]

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. O. H. Horton, Judge, presiding.

Mr. F. P. Read, for appellant.

Messrs. Tatham & Webster, for appellee.

Moran, J.

A bill was filed by appellant against the appellees, seeking, among other relief, to have it declared that the term for which the appellee, “ The Consolidated Ice Machine Company,” was to continue in business, had expired, and to have the business of said company wound up, and the right to such relief depends upon allegations in the bill denying that the company was ever properly organized, or had so complied with the statute as to be entitled to do business as a corporation.

A demurrer was sustained to the bill, and the same dismissed for want of equity, and from said order this appeal is prosecuted. Appellee has moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that this court has no jurisdiction in such a case. The motion must be granted. The right to be a corporation is itself a franchise. A franchise is as much involved when *134the relief sought is to enjoin the company from acting as a corporation, as when it is sought to enjoin the incorporation of a company by a given name. Drummond Tobacco Co. v. Randle et al., 114 Ill. 412. When a franchise is involved the appeal must be taken to the Supreme Court. C. & W. I. R. R. Co. v. Dunbar, 95 Ill. 571; Coal Mining Co. v. Edwards, et al., 103 Ill. 472; Chicago Theological Seminary v. Gage, 103 Ill. 175.

*Appeal dismissed.*
Exhibit 31.2

Certifications

I, Bryant P. Bynum, Officer of Keystone Automotive Operations, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Keystone Automotive Operations, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                      |  |                             
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|Date: August 15, 2006
|                      | 
|By:                   |  | /s/ BRYANT P. BYNUM         
|                      |  | Bryant P. Bynum             
|                      |  | Executive Vice President and
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT MARCH 31, 1999 AND FROM THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENT.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         267,665
<SECURITIES>                                    58,379
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,740
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,132
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               362,841
<PP&E>                                         232,382
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,233
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 633,235
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           75,003
<BONDS>                                        480,038
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           503
<OTHER-SE>                                      68,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   633,235
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,976
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,625
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,818
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   555
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,266
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (49,126)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (49,126)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (49,126)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.98)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.98)
        

</TABLE>
Skip to main content

# Social Security

Search
Menu
Español
Sign in

## Investment Transactions

Office of the Chief Actuary 

Frequently asked questions about the Trust Funds

Interest rate information

Investments held at a selected point in time

Trust fund data

The Social Security trust funds, managed by the     Department of the Treasury, are the Old-Age     and Survivors Insurance (**OASI**) and     Disability Insurance (**DI**)      Trust Funds. Since the beginning of the Social Security program, all     securities held by the trust funds have been issued by the Federal Government. 

There are two general types of such securities:      - special issues —securities       available only to the trust funds; and
- public issues—securities available to the public        (marketable securities).
      Today all securities held by the trust funds are special issues,      but the funds have held public issues in the past. 

Monthly reports from the     Bureau    of the Fiscal Service provide data on the amount held at the end of the month by type of    security, interest rate, and maturity date. The form below    provides a summary of the transactions of the trust funds for a given time period.    Data are available for 1990 and later.
| Report-   Summary for calendar year you specify
-   Detailed monthly transactions for        year and fund you specify
-   Time series ending with year you specify, for         selected fund
Trust fund             OASI            DI            Both funds combined (OASDI)Year                     (data available after 1989)                           
Footer menu |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### CECIL TYSON and wife, HESTER TYSON v. STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION, MINNIE TYSON WINBORN and husband, ROBERT WINBORN.

(Filed 18 March, 1959.)

Eminent Domain § 11—

In an action by the owner of an interest in lands against 'the 'State Highway Commission to recover compensation for 'the taking of a portion iof the land, .the joinder, as a respondent, of.the owner of the other interest in the land cannot result in a misjoinder of parties and causes, since the action is to enforce a single right to recover compensation, and the joinder of all parties having an interest in the land is required by G.S. 40-12.

Appeal by respondent State Highway Commission from *Bone, Resident Judge,*in chambers, 1 November 1958. WilsoN.

Special proceeding for recovery of -compensation for lands of petitioners appropriated by respondent for highway purposes, heard upon a demurrer.

A summary of the allegations of the petition follow:

Cecil Tyson is the owner of a farm containing 128.25 acres, and his wife has a dower interest therein. On 1 January 1957 the respondent appropriated a described part of it for ¡highway purposes 'by virtue of ¡the power of eminent domain vested in it by G.S. 40-12 *et seq.*and G.S. 136-19.

Cecil Tyson was the sole owner of a fee simple title to part of this farm, and was the owner of a one-half undivided interest in the remaining part of the farm. The respondent Minnie Tyson Winbom is the owner of the other one-half interest in the farm as a tenant in common with Cecil Tyson. Robert Winbom is her husband.

Petitioners have been damaged by the talcing of said land and by damage to the remaining land, and have not been compensated by the State Highway Commission.

The petitioners pray that the court -appoint commissioners to appraise the damages sustained by them as a resul-t of the taking of their property by the State Highway Commission, and fix the compensation to which -they are entitled.

*733The State Highway Commission demurred to the petition on the ground that there is a misjoinder of parties and causes.

The Clerk of the Court overruled the demurrer. On appeal Judge Bone overruled the demurrer, ¡and the State Highway Commission appeals.

*Thorp, Spruill, Thorp & Trotter for petitioners, appellees.*

*Malcolm B. Seawell, Attorney General, Kenneth Wooten, Jr.,*As*sistant Attorney General, Glenn L. Hooper, Jr., Trial Attorney, and*Lucas, *Rand & Rose for State Highway Commission, appellant.*

PER CüRiam.

G.S. 40-12 required the petitioners to state in their petition the names of all parties who own or have, ¡or claim to own or have, estates or interests in the land. The ¡averments in the petition as to the respondents, Winbom, ¡is in compliance with this ¡statute. Petitioners seek no relief of any kind ¡against the Winboms.

According to the allegations of ¡the petition, the petitioners merely seek to enforce a single right, that is, to recover from the State Highway Commission compensation for lands of theirs ¡appropriated by it for highway purposes.

There is no misjoinder of parties and causes, and Judge Bone correctly overruled the demurrer.

Affirmed.