alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2
                                 CERTIFICATION

         I, Edward B. Rudner, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Online Vacation Center
Holdings Corp;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

            (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

            (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

         5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditor and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

            (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

            (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: August 14, 2006

/s/ Edward B. Rudner
--------------------
Edward B. Rudner
Principal Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Legal Services Corporation

# AGENCY:

Legal Services Corporation.

# ACTION:

Correction notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        On January 22, 2016, the Legal Services Corporation (LSC) published a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         (81 FR 3836) titled “Assessing the Goals in the Strategic Plan 2012-2016; Request for Comments.” The contact information listed in the Supplementary Information section of the previous notice has an incorrect link to LSC's Strategic Plan. This document corrects the notice by correcting the link to LSC's Strategic Plan with the correct web link.                    

# DATES:

This correction is effective January 22, 2016.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Rebecca Fertig Cohen, Chief of Staff, Legal Services Corporation, 3333 K Street NW., Washington, DC 20007; (202) 295-1576;                         *cohenr@lsc.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The correct link to LSC's Strategic Plan is available at                     *http://www.lsc.gov/​about-lsc/​who-we-are/​strategic-plan.*

Dated: January 28, 2016.

Katherine Ward,

Executive Assistant to the Vice President for Legal Affairs and General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2016-01845 Filed 2-1-16; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7050-01-P
Exhibit 99.0


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thistle Group Holdings,  Co.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report")
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof,  we,
John F. McGill, Jr., Chief Executive Officer, and Pamela M. Cyr, Chief Financial
Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ John F. McGill, Jr.                              /s/ Pamela M. Cyr
---------------------------                          ---------------------------
John F. McGill, Jr.                                  Pamela M. Cyr
Chief Executive Officer                              Chief Financial Officer



May 14, 2003
Exhibit 32.1    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the annual report of Solutions Mechanical, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffery Thompson, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: April 14, 2008/s/ Jeffery ThompsonJeffery ThompsonChief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18

OF THE UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of World Energy Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Benjamin C. Croxton, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/Benjamin C. Croxton

--------------------------------

BENJAMIN C. CROXTON

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer

World Energy Solutions, Inc.



November 13, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 237 (Monday, December 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 63546]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30030]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF NATIONAL DRUG CONTROL POLICY


National Consultation on Drug Control

AGENCY: Office of National Drug Control Policy.

ACTION: The Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) is 
requesting an emergency review under the Paperwork Reduction Act. This 
is because ONDCP is required by law to deliver the 1996 National Drug 
Control Strategy and Budget document to the Congress in February, 1996, 
and the subject consultation is critical to the development of that 
Strategy.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of National Drug Control Policy, Executive Office 
of the President, in carrying out its responsibilities under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, 5 CFR 1320 {53 FR 16618, 
May 10, 1988}), is submitting a request to conduct a National 
Consultation on Drug Control, entitled ``Consult With America.'' The 
ONDCP consultation survey instrument will be used to assess public 
opinion regarding perceptions of the use and impact of illicit drugs; 
the effectiveness of prevention, intervention and treatment programs; 
and level of public support for specific drug control actions. A 
telephone survey of a random sample of adults 18 years of age and older 
will be conducted.

DATES: ONDCP has requested an emergency review of this submission under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act; this Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 
review has been requested to be completed by December 8, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Comments and questions regarding the 
National Survey on Drug Control should be directed to Mr. N. Ross Deck, 
Senior Policy Analyst, Office of National Drug Control Policy, 
Executive Office of the President, 750 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 
20500, (202) 395-6736. Any member of the public who wants to comment on 
the information collection request which has been submitted to OMB 
should advise Mr. Deck of this intent at the earliest possible date.

    Average Burden Hours/Minutes per Response: 12 Minutes.
    Frequency of Response: One time data collection.
    Number of Respondents: 2,000.
    Total Annual Burden Hours: 400.
    Total Annual Response: 2,000.
    Affected Public: Non-institutional adult (18 years of age or older) 
population residing in the U.S. at the household level.
    Respondents Obligation to Replay: The survey is voluntary.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 1st day of December, 1995.
N. Ross Deck,
Senior Policy Analyst.
[FR Doc. 95-30030 Filed 12-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3180-02-P
<Page>

EXHIBIT 11.4

                                         ALLEGIANCE TELECOM, INC.
                                COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (LOSS)
                                  NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000
                           (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)


<Table>
<Caption>

                                                              NUMBER OF     PERCENT
                                                               SHARES     OUTSTANDING    EQUIVALENT SHARES
                                                             ----------   -----------    -----------------
<S>                                                          <C>          <C>            <C>
Prior to Public Offering
   1997 Common Stock Offering                                       639     100.00%                  639

After Initial Public Offering
   1998 Common Stock Offering                                15,000,000     100.00%           15,000,000
   Preferred Stock Converted to Common Stock                 60,511,692     100.00%           60,511,692
   1999 Common Stock Offering                                21,041,100     100.00%           21,041,100
   2000 Common Stock Offering                                10,703,109      87.58%            9,373,972
   Treasury Shares                                             (327,495)     84.51%             (276,775)
   Warrants Exercised                                           741,138      83.67%              620,077
   Stock Options Exercised                                      825,659      63.85%              527,188
   Cash in Lieu of Stock Split                                     (577)     78.51%                 (453)
   Employee Stock Discount Purchase Plan Shares Issued          217,830      89.25%              194,418
   Common Stock Issued for Business Acquisitions                393,482      39.51%              155,461
                                                                                           -------------

   WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING                                                       107,147,319

   NET LOSS APPLICATION TO COMMON STOCK                                                    $(191,332,000)

   NET LOSS PER SHARE, BASIC AND DILUTED                                                   $       (1.79)
                                                                                           =============

</Table>
Exhibit 32    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of Way Cool Imports, Inc. a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Cornelius Hofman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/ Cornelius Hofman Cornelius Hofman Chief Executive Officer Date: March 30, 2011 Chief Financial Officer
#### SCOTT DILLINGHAM v. BLUE RIDGE MOTORS, INC.

(Filed 19 September, 1951.)

1. Appeal and Error § 6c (3) —

A broadside exception and assignment of error to the findings of fact and conclusions of law as set out in the judgment presents only whether the facts found support the judgment.

*1722. Judgments § 27a—

The court’s findings that plaintiff had failed to establish mistake, surprise, inadvertence or excusable neglect, and that he had failed to show a meritorious defense, sustains the court’s judgment denying plaintiff’s motion under G.S. 1-220 to set aside the judgment by default against him on defendant’s counterclaim.

Valentine, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Rudisill, J.,*at May Term, 1951, of *Buncombe.*

Civil action in claim and delivery by plaintiff to recover possession of an automobile held by the defendant to preserve its mechanic’s lien for repairs under G.S. 44-2. The defendant, after replevying and holding the automobile, filed answer denying the plaintiff’s right to possession and by way of counterclaim set up its lien for repairs in the amount of $170.14. The defendant’s answer containing the counterclaim was duly served on the plaintiff by the sheriff of Buncombe County. No reply or other pleading was filed within the statutory period therefor and the Clerk of the Superior Court entered judgment by default final on the counterclaim. Thereupon, the plaintiff moved the Clerk to set aside the judgment for mistake, excusable neglect, and so forth, under the provisions of G.S. 1-220. The motion was denied and the plaintiff appealed to the Judge of the Superior Court.

From judgment affirming the action of the Clerk, the plaintiff appeals, assigning errors.

*Scott Dillingham, plaintiff, in propria persona, appellant.*

*J. M. Horner for defendant, appellee.*

JOHNSON, J.

The plaintiff merely excepted to the judgment below and assigned as error the court’s “findings of fact and conclusions of law as set out in said judgment.” This assignment of error is broadside. The exception and assignment bring up only the question whether the facts found support the judgment. *Bailey v. McPherson,*233 N.C. 231, 63 S.E. 2d 559; *Burnsville v. Boone,*231 N.C. 577, 58 S.E. 2d 351. The Judge below found as facts that the plaintiff failed to establish either (1) mistake, surprise, inadvertence, or excusable neglect, or (2) that he has a meritorious defense to the counterclaim within the purview of G.S. 1-220. These findings support the judgment. No error appears on the face of the record. Therefore, the judgment below is

Affirmed.

Valentine, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5687 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 9, 2014 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 101 East Market Street in Long Beach, California, as the ‘‘Juanita Millender-McDonald Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5687 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. JUANITA MILLENDER-MCDONALD POST OF2 FICE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 101 East Market Street in Long 

5 Beach, California, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Juanita Millender-McDonald Post Office’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in section 1 shall be 

10 deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Juanita Millender11 McDonald Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 8, 

2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION BALTIMORE, MD 21235-0001

SOCIAL SECURITY

Office of the Chief Actuary

February 17, 2012 

The Honorable Xavier Becerra

Ranking Member, Subcommittee on Social Security 

Committee on Ways and Means 

House of Representatives

Washington, D.C. 20515 

Dear Mr. Becerra:

We have reviewed the language in Section 1001, “Extension of Payroll Tax Reduction”, of the 

conference report on H.R. 3630 (H.Rep. 112-399). We estimate that the enactment of this 

provision would have a negligible effect on the financial status of the Old Age and Survivors 

Insurance and Disability Insurance (OASDI) program in both the near term and the long term. 

We estimate that the projected level of the OASI and DI Trust Funds would be unaffected by 

enactment of this provision. Future benefit levels would be unaffected because the reduced 

payroll tax rate would not affect the amount of covered earnings that is credited for benefit 

purposes. 

Section 1001 of the bill makes the following changes for payroll tax rates and OASDI benefits: 

(1) extends the payroll tax rate reduction of 2 percentage points for wages and salaries paid

through the end of calendar year 2012 and for self-employment earnings through the end of

calendar year 2012; (2) transfers revenue from the General Fund of the Treasury to the OASI

and DI Trust Funds so that total revenue for the trust funds and the timing of receipt of such

revenue would be unaffected by the reduction in the payroll tax rate; (3) eliminates the special

section of current law related to payroll tax for individuals with earnings in excess of one-sixth

of the 2012 OASDI contribution and benefit base ($110,100) that was enacted for a payroll tax

rate reduction for January and February of 2012; and (4) credits earnings to the records of

workers for the purpose of determining future benefits payable from the trust funds so that such

benefits would be unaffected by the reduction in payroll tax for 2012.

For wage and salary earnings, the 2-percent rate reduction applies to the employee share of the 

payroll tax rate. For self-employment earnings, the personal income tax deduction for the 

OASDI payroll tax would be 59.6 percent of the portion of such taxes attributable to selfemployment earnings for 2012. Other sections of the bill would have no direct effects on the 

OASDI program.

Sincerely,

Stephen C. Goss 

Chief Actuary
Hon. 0.N. Humphreys, Jr.

Administrator Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711

Dear Mr. Humphreys: Opinion No.M-583 Re:Whether the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission may utilize part of the funds specified in Item 19 of itsappropriations for construction of a revenue station at Eagle Pass.

You have requested the opinion of this office regarding the above question. In this connection, we note that the General Appropriation Bill for the 1970-71 Biennium, in Item 19of itsappropriations for theAlcoholic Beverage Commission, provides as follows:

"19. For the construction of revenue stations along the international boundary, $28,000." A rider found inthe appropriation bill onpage III-16 reads, inpart, as follows?

"It is the intent of the Legislature that the funds appropriated above in Item 19 shall be expended for the construction, maintenance, and operation of revenue stations along the international boundary at~Los Ebanos, RioGrande City, Amistad Dam, Fabens, and Presidio, provided that inaddition to the regular operating week, *..I) (Emphasis supplied.)

-2781-Hon. 0.N. Humphreys, page 2 (M-583)

Inyour opinion request you advised that careful investigation and evaluation by your staffhad established that a serious need for a revenue station existed at Eagle Pass, and that theneed for such,a station atAmistad Damwas comparatively small. YOU also advised that there isno convenient source of liquor supply at present on the Mexican side ofAmistad Dam and that the traffic was relatively light. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the above quoted appropriation rider expressly limits the purposes forwhich Item 19 fundsmay be expended. This limitation iswithin the power of the Legislature. Your agency would have the authority to determine that a revenue station atAmistad Dam should notbe constructed out of the funds presently allocated, but the agency would have no authority to transfer the funds to ause other than that specificallydirected by theLegislature. Attorney General's Opinions C-21 (1963)and O-5545 (1943). You are accordingly advised that it isthe opinion of this office that theAlcoholic Beverage Commission does nothave the authority to construct a revenue station at Eagle Pass, Texas from the funds appropriated in Item 19of the agency's appropriation. SUMMARY

In constructing new revenue stations along the international border with Mexico, theTexas Alcoholic Beverage Commission is limited to construction of those stations expressly enumerated by the Legislature intheAppropriation Bill. You&ery truly,

Attor@ General ofTexas Prepared by Malcolm L. Quick Assistant Attorney General

-2782-Hon. 0.N. Humphreys, page 3 (M-58,3)

APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE Kerns Taylor, Chairman W. E.Allen, Acting Co-Chairman Terry Reed Goodman Glenn Brown Bennie Bock Ronald Carr MEADE F. GRIFFIN Staff Legal Assistant ALFRED WALKER Executive Assistant NOLA WHITE First Assistant

-2783-