63732 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 238 / Tuesday, December 12, 1995 / Notices

APPENDIX—Continued

[Petitions Instituted On 11/27/95]

TA–W Subject firm (petitioners) Location Date of

petition Product(s)

31,653 ..... Akzo Nobel Salt, Inc. (USWA) ....................... Mainstee, MI ............... 11/07/95 Evaporated Salt.

31,654 ..... Abu Garcia, Inc. (Wkrs) ................................. Fairfield, NJ ................. 11/15/95 Warehouse/Sales etc. Fishing Rods, Reels.

31,655 ..... Albermarle Spinning Mills (Wkrs) .................. Albemarle, NC ............. 11/09/95 Yarn & Greige Cloth.

31,656 ..... American Trouser, Inc. (Co.) ......................... Columbus, MS ............ 11/15/95 Men’s Dress & Casual Slacks.

31,657 ..... Joseph A. Bank, Mfg. (UNITE) ...................... Hampstead, MD .......... 11/13/95 Men’s Suits, Sportcoats, Vest.

31,658 ..... Wilkes Mill & Feed Co. (Co.) ......................... Washington, GA .......... 11/10/95 Beef Cattle Feed.

31,659 ..... Custom Packaging Systems (Wkrs) .............. Manistee, MI ............... 11/13/95 Flexible Intermediate Bulk Containers.

31,660 ..... The Elkins Company (Wkrs) .......................... Elkins, WV ................... 11/14/95 Household Furniture.

31,661 ..... Westchester Lace, Inc. (UNITE) .................... West New York, NJ .... 11/14/95 Lace.

31,662 ..... Grossman and Sons, Inc. (UNITE) ................ Passaic, NJ ................. 11/14/95 Ladies’ Hats.

31,663 ..... J. Lamb, Inc. (UNITE) .................................... Englewood, NJ ............ 11/14/95 Vinyl Mattress Covers.

[FR Doc. 95–30152 Filed 12–11–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

Notice of Determinations Regarding

Eligibility to Apply for Worker

Adjustment Assistance and NAFTA

Transitional Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the

Trade Act of 1974, as amended, the

Department of Labor herein presents

summaries of determinations regarding

eligibility to apply for trade adjustment

assistance for workers (TA–W) issued

during the period of November, 1995.

In order for an affirmative

determination to be made and a

certification of eligibility to apply for

worker adjustment assistance to be

issued, each of the group eligibility

requirements of Section 222 of the Act

must be met.

(1) That a significant number or

proportion of the workers in the

workers’ firm, or an appropriate

subdivision thereof, have become totally

or partially separated,

(2) That sales or production, or both,

of the firm or subdivision have

decreased absolutely, and

(3) That increases of imports of

articles like or directly competitive with

articles produced by the firm or

appropriate subdivision have

contributed importantly to the

separations, or threat thereof, and to the

absolute decline in sales or production.

Negative Determinations for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

In each of the following cases the

investigation revealed that criterion (3)

has not been met. A survey of customers

indicated that increased imports did not

contribute importantly to worker

separations at the firm.

TA–W–31,547; Columbian Cutlery Co.,

Inc., Reading, PA

In the following cases, the

investigation revealed that the criteria

for eligibility have not been met for the

reasons specified.

TA–W–31,536; General Electric Co., GE

Transportation Systems—Erie, Erie,

PA

TA–W–31,434; CVI, Inc., Hilliard, OH

TA–W–31,440; BP Chemicals (Hitco),

Inc., Fibers & Materials Div., Santa

Ana, CA

Increased imports did not contribute

importantly to worker separations at the

firm.

TA–W–31,510; Movil Corp., Marketing,

Refining & Chemical Technical

Center (MRCTEC), Paulsboro, NJ

TA–W–31,472; Sara International, Inc.,

Opa Locka, FL

TA–W–31,478; J.H. Enterprise,

Shreveport, LA

The workers firm does not produce an

article as required for certification under

Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.

Affirmative Determinations for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

The following certifications have been

issued; the date following the company

name & location for each determination

references the impact date for all

workers for such determination.

TA–W–31,525; Matsushita Electric Corp

of America, Matsushita Television

Co., Franklin Park, IL: September

29, 1994.

TA–W–31,459; Treasure Craft, Compton,

CA: September 7, 1994.

TA–W–31,584; R & R Sportswear,

Exeter, PA: October 17, 1994.

TA–W–31,628; Cal-Style Furniture Mfg

Co., Compton, CA: November 20,

1994.

TA–W–31,417; Parker Drilling Co., Del

City, OK: September 1, 1994.

TA–W–31,446; Fruit of The Loom,

Rockingham, NC; August 29, 1994.

TA–W–31,421; Continental Systems,

Jonesboro, AR: September 7, 1994.

TA–W–31,518; Samson International

Ltd, Tulsa, OK: September 28, 1994.

TA–W–31,553; Stratus Computer, Inc.,

Marlboro, MA: October 4, 1994.

TA–W–31,419; Fifth Street Slacks,

Louisville, GA: September 7, 1994.

TA–W–31,580; The MFC Group, Telford,

PA: October 11, 1994.

TA–W–31,485; Quantum Corp., High

Capacity Storage Group, Colorado

Springs, CO Including ‘‘Temporary’’

workers employed through Kelly

Services, Inc., Colorado Springs, CO

& workers subcontracted through

the following firms, all located in

Colorado Springs, CO: Tech/Aid,

Olsten Staffing Services, Manpower

Temporary Services, Tad Staffing

Service, Power Temps and Aerotek:

September 19, 1994.

TA–W–31,610; Toll Gate Garmet Co.,

Inc., Hamilton, AL: October 26,

1994.

TA–W–31,602; Crown Textile Co., Plants

#01, #02, #03 & Converting Plant,

South Talladega, AL: October 23,

1994.

TA–W–31,465; Cranston Print Works

Co., Cranston, RI: September 13,

1994.

TA–W–31,555; Fruit of The Loom,

Woodville Apparel Corp.,

Woodville, MS: October 10, 1994.

TA–W–31,557; Fruit of The Loom,

Rienzi Manufacturing, Inc., Rienzi,

MS: October 9, 1994.

TA–W–31,568; Fruit of The Loom,

Greensburg, KY: October 4, 1994.

TA–W–31,599; Fruit of The Loom,

Bowling Green, KY: October 18,

1994.

Also, pursuant to Title V of the North

American Free Trade Agreement

Implementation Act (P.L. 103–182)

concerning transitional adjustment

assistance hereinafter called (NAFTA–

TAA) and in accordance with Section

250(a) Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title II,

of the Trade Act as amended, the

Department of Labor presents

summaries of determinations regarding

eligibility to apply for NAFTA–TAA

issued during the month of November,

1995.
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 238 / Tuesday, December 12, 1995 / Notices 63733

In order for an affirmative

determination to be made and a

certification of eligibility to apply for

NAFTA–TAA the following group

eligibility requirements of Section 250

of the Trade Act must be met:

(1) That a significant number or

proportion of the workers in the

workers’ firm, or an appropriate

subdivision thereof, (including workers

in any agricultural firm or appropriate

subdivision thereof) have become totally

or partially separated from employment

and either—

(2) That sales or production, or both,

of such firm or subdivision have

decreased absolutely,

(3) That imports from Mexico or

Canada of articles like or directly

competitive with articles produced by

such firm or subdivision have increased,

and that the increases in imports

contributed importantly to such

workers’ separations or threat of

separation and to the decline in sales or

production of such firm or subdivision;

or

(4) That there has been a shift in

production by such workers’ firm or

subdivision to Mexico or Canada of

articles like or directly competitive with

articles which are produced by the firm

or subdivision.

Negative Determinations NAFTA–TAA

In each of the following cases the

investigation revealed that criteria (3)

and (4) were not met. Imports from

Canada or Mexico did not contribute

importantly to workers’ separations.

There was no shift in production from

the subject firm to Canada or Mexico

during the relevant period.

NAFTA–TAA–00648; The MFC Group,

Telford, PA

NAFTA–TAA–00636; Colombian

Cutlery Co., Inc., Reading, PA

NAFTA–TAA–00653; Weksler

Instruments Corp., Freeport, NY

NAFTA–TAA–00652; Master Package

Corp., Owen, WI

In the following cases, the

investigation revealed that the criteria

for eligibility have not been met for the

reasons specified.

None

Affirmative Determinations NAFTA–

TAA

The following certifications have been

issued; the date following the company

name & location for each determination

references the impact date for all

workers for such determination.

NAFTA–TAA–00669; Kellogg USA, In.,

San Leandro Plant, San Leandro

CA: October 30, 1994.

NAFTA–TAA–00679; Cal-Style

Furniture Manufacturing Co.,

Compton, CA: November 9, 1994.

NAFTA–TAA–00664; Koring Brothers,

Inc., Long Beach, CA: October 24,

1994.

NAFTA–TAA–00662; Equitable

Resources Energy Co., Buckhannon,

WV: October 19, 1994.

I hereby certify that the

aforementioned determinations were

issued during the month of November,

1995. Copies of these determinations are

available for inspection in Room C–

4318, U.S. Department of Labor, 200

Constitution Avenue, N.W.,

Washington, D.C. 20210 during normal

business hours or will be mailed to

persons who write to the above address.

Dated December 1, 1995.

Russell Kile,

Acting Program Manager, Policy &

Reemployment Services, Office of Trade

Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 95–30153 Filed 12–11–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

[TA–W–31,385]

Johnson Controls Battery Group, Inc.

Louisville, Kentucky; Notice of

Affirmative Determination Regarding

Application for Reconsideration

By letter of November 13, 1995, the

petitioner requested administrative

reconsideration of the Department of

Labor’s Notice of Negative

Determination Regarding Eligibility to

Apply for Worker Adjustment

Assistance for workers of the subject

firm. The denial notice was signed on

October 13, 1995 and published in the

Federal Register on October 27, 1995

(60 FR 55063).

The petitioner presents evidence that

the subject firm shifted production to a

foreign owned facility.

Conclusion

After careful review of the

application, I conclude that the claim is

of sufficient weight to justify

reconsideration of the Department of

Labor’s prior decision. The application

is, therefore, granted.

Signed at Washington, D.C., this 30th day

of November 1995.

Russell T. Kile,

Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment

Services, Office of Trade Adjustment

Assistance.

[FR Doc. 95–30150 Filed 12–11–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

[NAFTA–00634]

Lockheed Martin, Ocean, Radar &

Sensor Systems, Utica, New York;

Amended Certification Regarding

Eligibility to Apply for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 250(a),

Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title II, of the

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 USC

2273), the Department of Labor issued a

Notice of Certification of Eligibility to

Apply for NAFTA Transitional

Adjustment Assistance on October 26,

1995, applicable to workers of Lockheed

Martin, Ocean, Radar & Sensor Systems

Division located in Utica, New York.

The notice will soon be published in the

Federal Register.

At the request of the State designee,

the Department has reviewed the subject

certification for workers at the subject

firm. Based on new findings, the

Department is amending the

certification to include all workers

engaged in the production of printed

circuit boards.

The intent of the Department’s

certification is to include all workers of

the subject firm who were adversely

affected by increased imports from

Canada or Mexico. Therefore, the

Department is amending the

certification to expand coverage to all

workers engaged in the production of

printed circuit boards and all workers

engaged in the inspection operation of

the printed circuit board assemblies at

Lockheed Martin, Ocean, Radar &

Sensor Systems Division located in

Utica, New York that were adversely

affected by increased imports from

Canada or Mexico and a shift in

production of the inspection operation

to Mexico, respectively.

The amended notice applicable to

NAFTA–00634 is hereby issued as

follows:

‘‘All workers engaged in the production of

printed circuit boards and all workers

engaged in the inspection operation of the

printed circuit board assemblies at Lockheed

Martin, Ocean, Radar & Sensor Systems

Division located in Utica, New York who

become totally or partially separated from

employment on or after October 5, 1994 are

eligible to apply for adjustment assistance

under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.’’

Signed at Washington, D.C. this 30th day

of November 1995.

Russell T. Kile.

Acting Program Manager, Policy and

Reemployment Services, Office of Trade

Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 95–30145 Filed 12–11–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M