alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20-0440

_______________________________________________________________________ STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JOSEPH FRANCIS SILVA

Defendant and Appellant

_______________________________________________________________________ ORDER

_______________________________________________________________________ Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that appellant is granted an extension of time to and include September 14, 2021, within which to prepare, file and serve, Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 9 2021

08/09/2021
Case Number: DA 20-0440
#### JIM WATSON v. SYLVA TANNING COMPANY.

(Filed 23 December, 1925.)

Instructions — Evidence—Contentions—Statutes—New Trials.

Under tbe provisions of our statute, C. S., 564, it is reversible error for tbe trial judge to fail to instruct tbe jury upon tbe law arising from tbe evidence in tbe case necessary to a correct finding of tbeir verdict, and a mere summary of tbe contentions of tbe parties is insufficient.

Appeal by defendant from *Finley, J.,*at May Term, 1925, of tbe Superior Court of Jaceson.

Tbe plaintiff brought suit for tbe recovery of damages for personal injury alleged to have been caused by tbe defendant’s negligence. Verdict and judgment for tbe plaintiff and appeal by tbe defendant upon errors assigned.

*Walter K. Moore and Sutton & Stillwell for plaintiff.*

*Alley & Alley for defendant.*

Adams, J.

Tbe defendant complains that tbe trial judge in bis instructions to tbe jury failed to “state in a plain and correct manner tbe evidence given in tbe case and to declare and explain tbe law arising *841thereon.” C. S., 564. In several cases recently decided we have stressed the necessity of observing this requirement and have reiterated the suggestion that a statement of the contentions accompanied with a bare enunciation of a legal principle is not sufficient: it is imperative that the law be declared, explained, and applied to the evidence. Upon at least two of the issues the instructions consist almost entirely of .a summary of the contentions of the parties; an error resulting, of course, from the momentary oversight of the cautious and thoughtful judge before whom the case was tried. *Nichols v. Fibre Co., ante,*1; *Richardson v. Cotton Mills,*189 N. C., 653; *S. v. O’Neal,*187 N. C., 22; *S. v. Thomas,*184 N. C., 757 ; *S. v. Merrick,*171 N. C., 788, 795.

For the error complained of there must be a

New trial.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 234 (Wednesday, December 6, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 62474]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-29682]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[AZ-024-06-1430-01; AZA-29177]


Notice of Realty Action

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Correction notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The notice of realty action published on Friday, July 7, 1995, 
in Federal Register document 60-130, page 35420 is corrected as 
follows:
    1. Page 35420, 2nd Column, Line 10, ``Maricopa County'' should 
read, ``Pinal County''.
    2. Page 35420, 2nd Column, Line 24, ``Sec. 19, lots 2, 3, 4, and 
E\1/2\SE\1/4\NW\1/4\,'' should read, Sec. 19, lots 2, 3, 4 and E\1/2\, 
SE\1/4\NW\1/4\,''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vivian Reid, Land Law Examiner, 
Phoenix District Office, 2015 West Deer Valley Road, Phoenix, Arizona 
85027, (602) 780-8090.

    Dated: November 28, 1995.
Gail Acheson,
Acting District Manager.
[FR Doc. 95-29682 Filed 12-5-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-32-P
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# PHOTOS ANDVIDEOS

Search

Search

                                - All Images 
                                - Other 
                                - Space Shuttle 

                                - Upload Date
                                - Photo Date
                                - Title

----

Download Image: Full Size (1.46 MB)

Tags:Space, Brazil, USSPACECOM

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0247

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ROBERT MATHEW HOLGUIN, JR.,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 30, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 25 2021

05/25/2021

Case Number: DA 19-0247
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
 
                      FISHER SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL INC.
                           WORLDWIDE SUBSIDIARY LIST
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                    Percentage       State/Country
                                                                                     Ownership       Incorporation
                                                                                   -------------  -------------------
<S>                                                                                <C>            <C>
Fisher Scientific Company L.L.C.                                                           100               Delaware
  Fisher Scientific Limited                                                                100                 Canada
Fisher Hamilton Inc.                                                                       100               Delaware
Fisher Scientific GmbH                                                                     100                Germany
  Kuhn + Bayer GmbH                                                                        100                Germany
Fisher Scientific of the Netherlands B.V.                                                  100            Netherlands
  Fisher Scientific B.V.                                                                   100            Netherlands
Fisher Scientific Worldwide Inc.                                                           100               Delaware
  Acros Organics N.V.                                                                      100                Belgium
    Resco Trade N.V.                                                                       100                Belgium
  Fisher Chimica N.V.                                                                      100                Belgium
  Fisher Scientific Holding Company                                                        100               Delaware
    Fisher Scientific Holding U.K., Limited                                                100         United Kingdom
    Fisher Scientific U.K., Limited                                                        100         United Kingdom
  Orme Scientific Limited                                                                  100         United Kingdom
  Fisher Scientific Holdings France S.A.                                                   100                 France
    Fisher Scientific S.A.                                                                 100                 France
Fisher Technology Group Inc.                                                               100               Delaware
Strategic Procurement Services Holdings Inc.                                               100               Delaware
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Meditecnic, Inc. (the "Company") on Form  10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof  (the "Report"),  I, Luc Badel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Luc Badel

By: Luc Badel

Chief Financial  Officer

November 6, 2008
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Social Security Benefits |
|---------------------------------------|--------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Office of the Chief Actuary | Effect of Early or Delayed Retirement on Retirement Benefits |
|-----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|

|  |
|--|

**Benefit, as a percentage of  Primary Insurance Amount (PIA),  payable at ages 62-67 and age 70**Yearof birthNormalRetirementAge (NRA)Credit for each year of    delayed retirement after NRA (percent)Benefit, as a    percentage of PIA, beginning at age--62636465666770192465380862⁄3931⁄31001031061151925-266531⁄280862⁄3931⁄31001031⁄21071171⁄21927-2865480862⁄3931⁄31001041081201929-306541⁄280862⁄3931⁄31001041⁄21091221⁄21931-3265580862⁄3931⁄31001051101251933-346551⁄280862⁄3931⁄31001051⁄21111271⁄21935-3665680862⁄3931⁄310010611213019376561⁄280862⁄3931⁄31001061⁄21131321⁄2193865, 2 mo.61⁄2791⁄6855⁄9922⁄9988⁄91055⁄1211111⁄121315⁄12193965, 4 mo.7781⁄3844⁄9911⁄9977⁄91042⁄31112⁄31322⁄3194065, 6 mo.7771⁄2831⁄390962⁄31031⁄21101⁄21311⁄2194165, 8 mo.71⁄2762⁄3822⁄9888⁄9955⁄91021⁄21101321⁄2194265, 10 mo.71⁄2755⁄6811⁄9877⁄9944⁄91011⁄41083⁄41311⁄41943-546687580862⁄3931⁄3100108132195566, 2 mo.8741⁄6791⁄6855⁄9922⁄9988⁄91062⁄31302⁄3195666, 4 mo.8731⁄3781⁄3844⁄9911⁄9977⁄91051⁄31291⁄3195766, 6 mo.8721⁄2771⁄2831⁄390962⁄3104128195866, 8 mo.8712⁄3762⁄3822⁄9888⁄9955⁄91022⁄31262⁄3195966, 10 mo.8705⁄6755⁄6811⁄9877⁄9944⁄91011⁄31251⁄31960 and later678707580862⁄3931⁄3100124Note:  Persons born on January 1 of any year should refer to the  previous year of birth. Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified Thursday Aug 19, 2010Need Larger Text?
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4820-2 Filed: 11/20/19 Entered: 11/20/19 13:18:05 Page 1

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4820-2 Filed: 11/20/19 Entered: 11/20/19 13:18:05 Page 2

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4820-2 Filed: 11/20/19 Entered: 11/20/19 13:18:05 Page 3

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4820-2 Filed: 11/20/19 Entered: 11/20/19 13:18:05 Page 4

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4820-2 Filed: 11/20/19 Entered: 11/20/19 13:18:05 Page 5

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4820-2 Filed: 11/20/19 Entered: 11/20/19 13:18:05 Page 6

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4820-2 Filed: 11/20/19 Entered: 11/20/19 13:18:05 Page 7

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4820-2 Filed: 11/20/19 Entered: 11/20/19 13:18:05 Page 8

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4820-2 Filed: 11/20/19 Entered: 11/20/19 13:18:05 Page 9

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4820-2 Filed: 11/20/19 Entered: 11/20/19 13:18:05 Page 10

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4820-2 Filed: 11/20/19 Entered: 11/20/19 13:18:05 Page 11

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4820-2 Filed: 11/20/19 Entered: 11/20/19 13:18:05 Page 12

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4820-2 Filed: 11/20/19 Entered: 11/20/19 13:18:05 Page 13

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4820-2 Filed: 11/20/19 Entered: 11/20/19 13:18:05 Page 14

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4820-2 Filed: 11/20/19 Entered: 11/20/19 13:18:05 Page 15

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4820-2 Filed: 11/20/19 Entered: 11/20/19 13:18:05 Page 16

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4820-2 Filed: 11/20/19 Entered: 11/20/19 13:18:05 Page 17

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4820-2 Filed: 11/20/19 Entered: 11/20/19 13:18:05 Page 18

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4820-2 Filed: 11/20/19 Entered: 11/20/19 13:18:05 Page 19

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4820-2 Filed: 11/20/19 Entered: 11/20/19 13:18:05 Page 20

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4820-2 Filed: 11/20/19 Entered: 11/20/19 13:18:05 Page 21

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4820-2 Filed: 11/20/19 Entered: 11/20/19 13:18:05 Page 22

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4820-2 Filed: 11/20/19 Entered: 11/20/19 13:18:05 Page 23

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4820-2 Filed: 11/20/19 Entered: 11/20/19 13:18:05 Page 24

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4820-2 Filed: 11/20/19 Entered: 11/20/19 13:18:05 Page 25

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4820-2 Filed: 11/20/19 Entered: 11/20/19 13:18:05 Page 26

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4820-2 Filed: 11/20/19 Entered: 11/20/19 13:18:05 Page 27

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4820-2 Filed: 11/20/19 Entered: 11/20/19 13:18:05 Page 28

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4820-2 Filed: 11/20/19 Entered: 11/20/19 13:18:05 Page 29

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4820-2 Filed: 11/20/19 Entered: 11/20/19 13:18:05 Page 30

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4820-2 Filed: 11/20/19 Entered: 11/20/19 13:18:05 Page 31

of 31
Motion Granted; Order filed May 20, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00777-CR

NO. 14-13-00776-CR

____________

AKILLEON LARAN CHASE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 174th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 1338722 & 1338723

ORDER

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal 

is wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant has made known to this Court his desire 

to review the record and file a pro se brief. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 

(1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969).

Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 174th District Court to afford 

appellant an opportunity to view the trial record in accordance with local procedure; that 

the clerk of that court furnish the record to appellant on or before June 6, 2014; that the 
clerk of that court certify to this court the date on which delivery of the record to 

appellant is made; and that appellant file his pro se brief with this court within thirty days 

of that date.

PER CURIAM
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-82,815-02

EX P ARTE CORDERRAL JOHN SMITH, App licant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. CR28321-B IN THE 253RD DISTRICT COURT

F ROM LIBERTY COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Applicant wa s convicted of capital murde r and sentenc ed to life imprisonment without the possibili ty of parole

. The Court of Appea ls aff irmed his conviction. Smith v. S t a t e , No. 13-10- 00552-CR (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi–Edinburg Apr. 12, 2012) (not desig nated for publication). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk f

orwa rded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Applicant contends, among other things, that trial counsel was ineffe ctive beca use he failed to conduct a meaning ful investiga tion, pursue any defe nses, advise Applicant prior to trial, prepa re Applicant to take the stand, introduce materia l impeachme nt evidenc e, and call cer tain defe nse wit n es s es to testify at trial. Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to relief

.2

Strickland v. W

ashington , 466 U.S. 668 (1984). Acc ording ly , the rec ord should be develope d. The trial court is the appropr iate forum for finding s of fac t. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial counsel to re spond to Applicant’s cla im. I n developing the re cord, the trial cour

t may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). I f the trial c ourt elec ts to hold a hear ing, it shall dete rmine whe ther Applica nt is indi g ent. I f Applicant is indige nt and wants to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to repr esent him at the hear ing. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. I f counsel is a ppointed or reta ined, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name

. The trial court shall make finding s of fac t and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel’s p er fo rm an ce was defic ient and Applicant was prejudice d. The trial court may make any ot h er finding s and conc lusions that it deems a ppropriate in response to Applica nt’s claim. The trial court shall make findings of fac t and conclusions o f law withi n ninety day s from the date of this order

. The district cler k shall then immediately forwa rd to this Court the trial court’s finding s and conclusions and the rec ord develope d on rema nd, including, among other things, aff idavits, motio n s, objections, proposed finding s and conclusions, order s, and transcr ipts from hear ings and depositions. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4). Any extensions of time must be reque sted by the trial cour

t and obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: May

12, 2021 Do not publish
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 244 (Wednesday, December 20, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65639-65640]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30844]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 65640]]



DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Extension of Comment Period on the Proposal To Change Items 85 
and 90 in the Military Traffic Management Command Freight Traffic Rules 
Publication 1A (MFTRP-1A) Governing Carrier's Entitlement to Detention 
Charges)

agency: Military Traffic Management Command, DOD.

action: Notice to extend comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

summary: This notice extends the deadline to January 31, 1996 for 
comments on the Military Traffic Management Command (MTMC) Proposal to 
Change Items 85 and 90 in the MTMC Freight Traffic Rules Publication 1A 
(MFTRP 1A) Governing Motor Carrier Entitlement to Detention Charges. 
Formerly the deadline for comments was December 26, 1995 as published 
on November 24, 1995 (FR, Vol. 60, No. 226, page 58052).

for further information contact: Mr. Leon N. Patton Jr., or Mr. John 
Alexander, (703) 681-6871, Headquarters, Military Traffic Management 
Command, ATTN: MTOP-T-NI, 5611 Columbia Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041-
5050.

supplementary information: None.
Gregory D. Showalter,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-30844 Filed 12-19-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3362 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3362

   To require the Healthy People Maternal, Infant, and Child Health 
 Workgroup and the Maternal Health Working Group to establish a formal 
coordinated approach for monitoring maternal health efforts across the 
                Department of Health and Human Services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 9, 2021

Mr. Warnock (for himself and Mr. Rubio) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the Healthy People Maternal, Infant, and Child Health 
 Workgroup and the Maternal Health Working Group to establish a formal 
coordinated approach for monitoring maternal health efforts across the 
                Department of Health and Human Services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Improving Coordination for Healthy 
Moms Act''.

SEC. 2. COORDINATED MATERNAL HEALTH EFFORTS.

    The Healthy People Maternal, Infant, and Child Health Workgroup and 
the Maternal Health Working Group shall provide recommendations to the 
Secretary of Health and Human Services (referred to in this section as 
the ``Secretary'') for establishing a formal coordinated approach for 
monitoring maternal health efforts across the Department of Health and 
Human Services, including in rural and underserved areas, and the 
Secretary, not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this 
Act, shall establish such an approach. Such approach may include 
establishing a process for exchanging information and discussing 
relevant program efforts and outcomes across the agency, during regular 
standing meetings, on a routine basis.
                                 <all>
```