alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 249 (Thursday, December 28, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67125-67126]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31441]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 67126]]


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-68-001]


Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

December 21, 1995.
    Take notice that on December 15, 1995, Northern Natural Gas Company 
(Northern), tendered for filing changes in its FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth 
Revised Volume No. 1.
    Northern states that the filing corrects the Stranded Account No. 
858 surcharge, which was filed on December 1, 1995. Therefore, Northern 
has filed Substitute 7th Rev Seventeenth Revised Sheet Nos. 50 and 51 
and Substitute Twenty Fifth Rev Sheet No. 53 to revise the surcharge to 
be effective January 1, 1996.
    Northern states that copies of this filing were served upon the 
Company's customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sec. 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. Pursuant to Sec. 154.210 of the 
Commission's Regulations, all such protests must be filed not later 
than 12 days after the date of the filing noted above. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken in this proceeding, but will not serve to make protestant a 
party to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-31441 Filed 12-27-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 29 (Monday, February 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8265-8266]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3524]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
[License No. 05/05-0222]


Norwest Equity Partners V; Notice of Issuance of a Small Business 
Investment Company License

    On December 5, 1994, a notice was published in the Federal Register 
(59 FR 62439) stating that an application had been filed by Norwest 
Equity Partners V, L.P., 2800 Piper Jaffrey Tower, 222 South Ninth 
Street, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402, with the Small Business 
Administration (SBA) pursuant to Sec. 107.102 of the Regulations 
governing small business investment companies (13 CFR 107.102 (1994)) 
for a license to operate as a non-leveraged small business investment 
company.
    Interested parties were given until close of business December 19, 
1994 to submit their comments to SBA. No comments were received.
    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to Section 301(c) of the 
Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended, after having 
considered the application and all other pertinent information, SBA 
issued License No. 05/05-0222 on February 6, 1995, to Norwest Equity 
Partners V to operate as a small business investment company.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 59.011, Small 
Business Investment Companies)

    [[Page 8266]] Dated: February 7, 1995.
Robert D. Stillman,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 95-3524 Filed 2-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
#### Lydia Vernum, Respondent, v. Andrew A. Wheeler, Appellant.

Motion denied.
1
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CSB Bancorp, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this annual report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Paula J. MeilerPaula J. MeilerSenior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer 
 29
Exhibit 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





The Board of Directors





Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. and subsidiaries:








We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-68320, 33-68318, 33-68316, 33-69688, and 33-92834 ) and on Form S-3 (No. 333-116825) of Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. and subsidiaries of our reports dated March 12, 2010 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, and the related financial statement schedule as of December 31, 2009 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, which reports appear in the December 31, 2009 annual report on Form 10-K of Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. and subsidiaries.  Our report dated March 12, 2010, refers to the Company’s adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157,“Fair Value Measurements”, as it relates to financial instruments, effective January 1, 2008.










/s/ KPMG LLP






Dallas, Texas






March 12, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 4 (Friday, January 6, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 2159]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-335]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in International Programs; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in International Programs
    Date and Time: January 23-24, 1995; 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. 
(Alternate date due to bad weather: January 30-31, 1995)
    Place: Rooms 340, 360 and 365
    Type of Meeting: Closed
    Contact Person: Janice Cassidy, Program Manager, Division of 
International Programs, Room 935, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Telephone: (703) 306-1701.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate applications submitted to the 
Division of International Programs for the Summer Institute in Japan 
for U.S. Graduate Students in Science and Engineering as part of the 
selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The meeting is closed to the public because 
of the proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary 
or confidential nature, including technical information; financial 
data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning 
individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt 
under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine 
Act.

    Dated: January 3, 1995.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-335 Filed 1-5-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 28, 2021

No. 04-21-00095-CV

MEAT SUPPLY, LLC,

Appellant

v.

510 GOOD LATIMER, LLC,

Appellee

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020-CI-11151

Honorable Angelica Jimenez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s second motion for an extension of time to file its brief is GRANTED. 

Appellant’s brief is due on or before June 28, 2021; however, no further extensions will be 

granted absent extenuating circumstances.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 28th day of May, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
### Proposed Provision: B5.4. Beginning for those newly eligible in 2030, reconfigure the special minimum benefit: (a) A year of coverage is defined as a year in which 4 quarters of coverage are earned. (b) At implementation, set the PIA for 30 years of coverage equal to 125 percent of the monthly poverty level (about $1,416 in 2022). For those with under 30 years of coverage, the PIA per year of coverage over 10 years is $1,416/20 = $70.80. (c) From 2022 to the year of implementation, 2030, index the PIA per year of coverage using the chain-CPI index. Then, for later years, index the PIA per year of coverage by wage growth for successive cohorts. (d) Scale work requirements for disabled workers, based on the number of years of non-disabled potential work.
EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thistle Group Holdings, Co. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended June 30, 2003 (the  "Report") as
filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof,  we, John
F. McGill,  Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Pamela Cyr, Chief Financial Officer
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Date: August 13, 20003




/s/ John F. McGill, Jr.                             /s/ Pamela Cyr
---------------------------                         ----------------------------
John F. McGill, Jr.                                 Pamela Cyr
Chief Executive Officer                             Chief Financial Officer
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual Balance 

in 75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

B

7

-1.70% -4.20% 0.31% 0.44% -1.39% 

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2008 Trustees Report Office of the Chief A

July 16, 2008

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Level of Monthly Benefits (PIA)

Proposed Provision: Increase the number of years used to calculate benefits for retirees annot for disabled workers) from 35 to 38, phased in 2009-2013

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this 

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

0.02.04.06.08.0

10.012.014.016.018.020.0

2008 2018 2028 2038 2048 2058 2068 2078

Year

Percent

Cost rates with this provisionCost rates under present lawIncome rates with this provisionIncome rates under present law

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

 (assets as a percentage of annual expe

0

100200300400500600700800900

1000

2008 2018 2028 2038 2048 2058 

Year

Percent

Present law With this p
#### STATE v. NATHANIEL STEVENSON.

(Filed 28 November, 1945.)

Appeal by defendant from *Burney, J.,*at June Term, 1945, of Columbus.

*772Criminal prosecution upon bill of indictment charging in separate counts that defendant and others did unlawfully (1) transport, (2) possess, and (3) possess for the purpose of sale, respectively, intoxicating liquors, upon which the State and Federal taxes had not been paid, contrary to the form of the statute, etc.

Verdict: Guilty thereof in manner and form as charged in the bill of indictment.

Judgment: Pronounced — and defendant appeals therefrom to Supreme Court and assigns error.

*Aiiorney-General McMullan and Assistant Aitorneys-General Rhodes, Moody, and Tucher for the State.*

*Detlaiv Sanderson and Wm. F. Jones for defendant, appellant.*

Per Curiam.

The assignments of error brought up for consideration on this appeal in the main relate (1) to trial court’s overruling of motion of defendant for a continuance, (2) to alleged expressions of opinion by the court, (3) to refusal of motion for judgment as of nonsuit, and (4) to portions of the charge.

Careful consideration of each of them, in the light of the factual situation and of the evidence offered considered in the light most favorable to the State, reveals no new questions of law and only a case for the jury. Moreover, defendant fails to show prejudicial error. Hence, in the judgment below we find

No error.
**Exhibit 32****CERTIFICATION**The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:(1) The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006, fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and(2) The information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Date:  May 15, 2006 /s/ Mark N. Schwartz   Chief Executive Officer              Date:  May 15, 2006 /s/ James S. Murphy   Chief Financial Officer      
26
## Detailed Single Year Tables

- Individual Provisions
- Family Members

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						D2: The current spouse benefit is based on 50 percent of the PIA of the other spouse. Reduce this percent each year by 1 percentage point beginning with newly eligible spouses in 2024, until the percent reaches 33 in 2040.**

### Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program

### Summarized Estimates
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 243 (Tuesday, December 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 65354]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3070]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service


Endangered and Threatened Species Permit Applications

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of receipt of applications.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The following applicants have applied for permits to conduct 
certain activities with endangered species. This notice is provided 
pursuant to section 10(c) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as 
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).

PRT-809224

    Applicant: U.S. Department of Energy, Portsmouth Site Office, 
Piketon, Ohio.
    The applicant requests a permit to take (capture and release) 
Indiana Bats (Myotis sodalis) within the DOE PORTS reservation boundary 
to determine presence or absence of the species. Data will be used to 
assess impacts when designing projects on the reservation.

PRT-809227

    Applicant: Dr. Virgil Brack, 3D/Environmental, Cincinnati, Ohio.
    The applicant requests a permit to take (capture and release, 
handle, radio-tag) Indiana Bats (Myotis sodalis) and Gray Bats (Myotis 
grisescens) in Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, Michigan, and Missouri. 
Permit is sought for activities proposed to document presence/absence, 
habitat use, monitor populations, and evaluate effects of industrial, 
commercial, and military activities on the species.
    Written data or comments should be submitted to the Regional 
Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Endangered 
Species, 1 Federal Drive, Fort Snelling, Minnesota 55111-4056, and must 
be received within 30 days of the date of this publication.
    Documents and other information submitted with these applications 
are available for review by any party who submits a written request for 
a copy of such documents to the following office within 30 days of the 
date of publication of this notice: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 
Division of Endangered Species, 1 Federal Drive, Fort Snelling, 
Minnesota 55111-4056. Telephone (612/725-3536, x250); FAX: (612/725-
3526).

    Dated: December 11, 1995.

John A. Blankenship,
Assistant Regional Director, Ecological Services, Region 3, Fish and 
Wildlife Service, Fort Snelling, Minnesota.
[FR Doc. 95-3070 Filed 12-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7306

RICHARD DAVID DEGOUT,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

TERRY O’BRIEN, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District

Judge. (7:07-cv-00374-jct)

Submitted: December 13, 2007 Decided: December 20, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard David Degout, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Richard David Degout seeks to appeal the district court’s

order treating his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000), as

a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion and dismissing it on

that basis. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000); Reid v. Angelone, 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir.

2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Degout has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
## Detailed Single Year Tables

- Individual Provisions
- Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable)

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						E1.8: Increase the payroll tax rate (currently 12.4 percent) by 0.1 percentage point each year from 2026-2031, until the rate reaches 13.0 percent for 2031 and later.**

### Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program

### Summarized Estimates
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three and six months ended March 31,
2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a)-14(b) or 15(d)-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the
periods indicated.
  By:
    /s/ KATHLEEN M. CRUSCOKathleen M. CruscoChief Financial Officer
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 1.07 1.18 30% 27%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

September 15, 2023

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable)

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: E3.2. Increase the taxable maximum such that 90 percent of earnings would be 

subject to the payroll tax (phased in 2024-2033). Do not provide benefit credit for additional earnings 

taxed.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision
#### Hiland S. Hall, Appellant, v. Alexander W. Putnam, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Opinion by

Haight, J.
(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
 /s/ LEWIS W. DICKEY, JR.Name:
    Lewis W. Dickey, Jr.Title:
    Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer/s/ Joseph Patrick HannanName:
    Joseph Patrick HannanTitle:
    Vice President and Interim Chief
Financial Officer   44