Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 8, 1995 / Notices 7617

1 1.5 narrow-body aircraft (DC8, MD80, B707,

B727, B737, B757 or similar aircraft) is considered

equivalent to one wide-body aircraft (L1011, DC10,

A300, B747SP, B767 or similar aircraft). Two

narrow-body aircraft is considered equivalent to

one B747–100 or similar aircraft.

2 Designated U.S. carriers for combination

services may operate via the following intermediate

points: Panama City, Panama; Guayaquil and Quito,

Ecuador; and on a blind-sector basis Bogota and

Cali, Colombia.

3Service to Guayaquil, Bogota and Cali may be

operated on a blind-sector basis only.

4American Airlines was awarded certificate

authority to serve Peru by Order 90–5–5. It has an

application pending for renewal of its certificate in

Docket 48343. Challenge was granted exemption

authority to serve Peru in 1987 (Order 87–2–38) and

has been allocated the five available all-cargo

frequencies. (See Orders 87–7–52, 89–7–42, 91–6–

38 and 93–3–38.) Challenge has a pending

application in Docket 50009 for renewal of its

underlying authority and its frequency allocation.

5By Order 94–12–21, the Department allocated

United Air Lines, Inc. the available 4.5 weekly

combination frequencies on a temporary basis for

the period January 15, 1995 through April 15, 1995,

while we process a case for longer-term authority.

through 45, and 47 through 51 of the

Act, and the rules thereunder, as if

Cityfed were a registered investment

company, except insofar as permitted by

the order requested hereby.

3. Notwithstanding sections 17(a) and

17(d) of the Act, an affiliated person (as

defined in section 2(a)(3) of the Act) of

Cityfed may engage in a transaction that

otherwise would be prohibited by these

sections with Cityfed:

(a) If such proposed transaction is first

approved by a bankruptcy court on the

basis that (i) the terms thereof, including

the consideration to be paid or received,

are reasonable and fair to Cityfed, and

(ii) the participation of Cityfed in the

proposed transaction will not be on a

basis less advantageous to Cityfed than

that of other participants; and

(b) In connection with each such

transaction, Cityfed shall inform the

bankruptcy court of (i) the identity of all

of its affiliated persons who are parties

to, or have a direct or indirect financial

interest in, the transaction; (ii) the

nature of the affiliation; and (iii) the

financial interests of such persons in the

transaction.

For the SEC, by the Division of Investment

Management, under delegated authority.

Margaret H. McFarland,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–3111 Filed 2–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010–01–M

Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application

to Withdraw From Listing and

Registration; (Fund American

Enterprises Holdings, Inc., Common

Stock, $1.00 Par Value) File No. 1–8993

February 2, 1995.

Fund American Enterprises Holdings,

Inc. (‘‘Company’’) has filed an

application with the Securities and

Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’),

pursuant to Section 12(d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’)

and Rule 12d2–2(d) promulgated

thereunder, to withdraw the above

specified security (‘‘Security’’) from

listing and registration on the Pacific

Stock Exchange, Inc. (‘‘PSE’’). The

Security will continue to be listed on

the New York Stock Exchange

(‘‘NYSE’’).

The reasons alleged in the application

for withdrawing the Security from

listing and registration include the

following: (1) The average monthly

volume of the Security on the PSE for

the past six months has been

diminutive; (2) it is difficult to justify

the expense of the annual listing fee; (3)

all public documents that the Company

files must be filed in triplicate to the

PSE, resulting in a significant amount of

labor and other expense associated with

the maintenance of the PSE listing; and

(4) the Company no longer has a West

Coast business presence or significant

ownership base which were important

considerations in the original listing.

Any interested person may, on or

before February 24, 1995, submit by

letter to the Secretary of the Securities

and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth

Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549,

facts bearing upon whether the

application has been made in

accordance with the rules of the

exchanges and what terms, if any,

should be imposed by the Commission

for the protection of investors. The

Commission, based on the information

submitted to it, will issue an order

granting the application after the date

mentioned above, unless the

Commission determines to order a

hearing on the matter.

For the Commission, by the Division of

Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated

authority.

Jonathan G. Katz,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–3110 Filed 2–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

New Route Opportunities (U.S.-Peru);

Notice

By this Notice we invite certificate

applications from U.S. air carriers

interested in providing combination and

all-cargo services in the U.S.-Peru

market.

Under the 1986 Air Transport

Agreement between the United States

and Peru there are no limits on the

number of U.S. carriers that may be

designated to provide scheduled

combination or all-cargo services. The

number of frequencies these carriers

could operate, however, was limited to

16.5 weekly narrow body frequencies

for combination services and five

weekly narrow body frequencies for allcargo services. By an Exchange of Notes

on January 13, 1995, the Agreement was

amended to increase the number of

frequencies available to U.S. carriers for

the operation of scheduled combination

and all-cargo services. Under the

amended Agreement, U.S. carriers may

operate a maximum of 21 weekly

narrow-body frequencies or their widebody equivalent for combination

services; and eight frequencies per week

with narrow-body aircraft or their widebody equivalent for all-cargo air

services, effective January 15, 1995.1

There has been no change to the route

schedules. This means that designated

U.S. carriers may provide combination

services from the United States via

intermediate points to Lima, and

beyond to: La Paz, Bolivia and beyond

to Asuncion, Paraguay (to be operated as

one route); Santiago, Chile; and Buenos

Aires, Argentina (Santiago and Buenos

Aires to be served on separate flights

beyond Lima).2 Designated U.S. allcargo airlines are permitted to operate

between Miami and Lima via the

intermediate points Panama City,

Panama; Guayaquil, Ecuador; and

Bogota and Cali, Colombia.3

American Airlines currently holds the

16.5 narrow-body frequencies for

combination services, and Challenge Air

holds the 5 weekly narrow-body

frequencies for all-cargo services.4

Therefore, 4.5 narrow-body combination

and 3 narrow-body all-cargo frequencies

are available new long-term allocations.5

Carriers interested in using these new

opportunities should file certificate

applications including attendant

requests for frequency allocations

within 14 calendar days of the date of

this notice. Answers to any applications

filed will be due seven calendar days

thereafter; replies to any answers filed

will be due within five calendar days

after the answer date.

Except for the procedural dates,

certificate applications should conform

to Part 302, Subpart Q. Applications

should be filed with the Department’s

Docket Section, Room PL–401, 400

Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC

20590. Further procedures for acting on

the applications filed, if necessary, will
7618 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 8, 1995 / Notices

be established in the future by

Department notice or order.

Dated: February 2, 1995.

Paul L. Gretch,

Director, Office of International Aviation.

[FR Doc. 95–3083 Filed 2–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–62–P

Federal Aviation Administration

Advisory Circular (AC) 25–19,

Certification Maintenance

Requirements

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of issuance of advisory

circular.

SUMMARY: This notice announces the

issuance of Advisory Circular (AC) 25–

19, Certification Maintenance

Requirements. The AC provides

guidance on the selection,

documentation, and control of

Certification Maintenance Requirements

(CMR’s). It also provides a rational basis

for coordinating the Maintenance

Review Board (MRB) and CMR selection

processes in order to minimize the

impact of CMR’s on airplane operators.

DATES: Advisory Circular 25–19 was

issued on November 28, 1994, by the

Acting Manager of the Transport

Airplane Directorate, Aircraft

Certification Service, in Renton

Washington.

How To Obtain Copies

A copy of AC 25–19 may be obtained

by writing to the U.S. Department of

Transportation, Utilization and Storage

Section, M–443.2, Washington, DC

20590.

Issued in Renton, Wash., on January 20,

1995.

Neil D. Schalekamp,

Acting Manager, Transport Standards Staff

Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft

Certification Service, ANM–100.

[FR Doc. 95–3124 Filed 2–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

Receipt of Noise Compatibility

Program and Request for Review;

Palm Springs Regional Airport (PSP),

Palm Springs, California

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA) announces that it

is reviewing a proposed Noise

Compatibility Program that was

submitted by the city of Palm Springs

for Palm Springs Regional Airport (PSP),

Palm Springs, California under the

provisions of Title I of the Aviation

Safety and Noise Abatement Act of 1979

(Public Law 96–193) (hereinafter

referred to as ‘‘the Act’’) and 14 CFR

part 150. This program was submitted

subsequent to a determination by the

FAA that associated Noise Exposure

Maps submitted under 14 CFR part 150

for were in compliance with applicable

requirements effective November 28,

1994. The proposed Noise Compatibility

Program will be approved or

disapproved on or before July 25, 1995.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The effective date of the

start of the FAA’s review of the Noise

Compatibility Program is January 26,

1995. The public comment period ends

March 27, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Howard S. Yoshioka, Planning Section

Supervisor, Federal Aviation

Administration, Western-Pacific Region,

P.O. Box 92007, Worldway Postal

Center, Los Angeles, California 90009–

2007, (310) 297–1250. Comments on the

proposed Noise Compatibility Program

should also be submitted to the above

office.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This

notice announces that the FAA is

reviewing a proposed Noise

Compatibility Program for Palm Springs

Regional Airport which will be

approved or disapproved on or before

July 25, 1995. This notice also

announces the availability of this

program for public review and

comment.

An airport operator who has

submitted Noise Exposure Maps that are

found by the FAA to be in compliance

with the requirements of Federal

Aviation Regulations (FAR) part 150,

promulgated pursuant to Title I of the

Act, may submit a Noise Compatibility

Program for the FAA approval which

sets forth the measures the operator has

taken or proposes for the reduction of

existing noncompatible uses and for the

prevention of the introduction of

additional noncompatible uses.

The FAA has formally received the

Noise Compatibility Program for Palm

Springs Regional Airport, effective on

January 26, 1995. It was requested that

the FAA review this material and that

the noise mitigation measures, to be

implemented jointly by the airport and

surrounding communities, be approved

as a Noise Compatibility Program under

Section 104(b) of the Act. Preliminary

review of the submitted material

indicates that it conforms to the

requirements for the submittal of Noise

Compatibility Programs, but that further

review will be necessary prior to

approval or disapproval of the program.

The formal review period, limited by

law to a maximum of 180 days, will be

completed on or before May 15, 1991.

The FAA’s detailed evaluation will be

conducted under the provisions of 14

CFR part 150, section 150.33. The

primary considerations in the

evaluation process are whether the

proposed measures may reduce the level

of aviation safety, create an undue

burden on interstate or foreign

commerce, or be reasonably consistent

with obtaining the goal of reducing

existing noncompatible land uses and

preventing the introduction of

additional noncompatible land uses.

Interested persons are invited to

comment on the proposed program with

specific reference to these factors. All

comments, other than those properly

addressed to local land use authorities,

will be considered by the FAA to the

extent practicable. Copies of the Noise

Exposure Maps, the FAA’s evaluation of

the maps, and the proposed Noise

Compatibility Program are available for

examination at the following locations:

Federal Aviation Administration, 800

Independence Avenue, SW., Room

615, Washington, DC 20591;

Federal Aviation Administration,

Western-Pacific Region, AWP–600,

P.O. Box 92007 WPC, Los Angeles,

California 90009–2007;

Mr. Allen F. Smoot, A.A.E., Director of

Aviation, City of Palm Springs,

Department of Aviation, Palm Springs

Regional Airport, P.O. Box 2743, Palm

Springs, California 92263–2743.

Questions may be directed to the

individual named above under the

heading, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT.

Herman C. Bliss,

Manager, Airports Division.

[FR Doc. 95–3125 Filed 2–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

Notice of Intent To Prepare

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)

for Proposed Localizer—Type

Directional Aid (LDA) at the Santa

Monica Municipal Airport, Santa

Monica, CA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an

EIS and notice of scoping meetings.

SUMMARY: In compliance with the

National Environmental Policy Act

(NEPA), and Council on Environmental

Quality (CEQ) Policy Regulations (40

CFR 1500–1508), FAA will prepare an

EIS to evaluate potential environmental