alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE v. WILLIAM MITCHELL.

(Filed 6 June, 1930.)

Criminal Law L e — Error, if any, in excluding testimony intended to impeach State’s character witnesses held not reversible error.

In this case *held,:*defendant’s exception to the exclusion of testimony sought to be elicited on cross-examination from certain of the State’s witnesses who had testified to the good character of another State witness and to the character of the deceased, offered as tending to impeach such character witnesses, if it be conceded that the testimony was competent for this restricted purpose, its exclusion cannot be held for reversible error.

Appeal by tbe defendant from *Stack, J.,*at March Term, 1930, of Eukke. No error.

This is a criminal action in which the defendant was tried on an indictment for murder, and convicted of manslaughter.

From judgment on the verdict, that defendant be confined in the State’s prison at hard labor for a term of not less than twelve nor more than eighteen years, defendant appealed to the Supreme Court.

*Attorney-General Brwmmitt and. Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.*

*Avery & Patton, S. J. Ervin and S. J. Enin, Jr., for defendant.*

Pee CubiaM.

There was no error on the trial of this action for which the defendant is entitled to a new trial.

The only assignments of error on his appeal to this Court are based on his exceptions to the exclusion of testimony sought to be elicited on the cross-examination of witnesses for the State who had testified that the general character of another witness for the State was good, and that the deceased did not have a general reputation as a dangerous man. This testimony was offered as evidence tending to impeach these witnesses, and not as evidence upon the issue to be determined by the jury. If it be conceded that the testimony was admissible for the restricted purpose for which it was offered, we cannot hold that its exclusion was reversible error.

The conflicting evidence tending to sustain the verdict, and also in support of defendant’s plea of self-defense, was submitted to the jury under a charge to which there were no exceptions. The judgment must be affirmed. We find

No error.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 25

                            POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears 
below constitutes and appoints Christopher J. Amenson, jointly and 
severally, his attorney-in-fact, each with the power of substitution, for him 
in any and all capacities, to sign any amendments to this Report on Form 
10-K, and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in 
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby 
ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact, or his 
substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this 
Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the 
Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

SIGNATURE                               TITLE                              DATE
---------                               ------                             -----
<S>                                     <C>                                <C>

/s/ Christopher J. Amenson                                                 September  19, 1998
____________________________            Chairman of the Board,             _____________________
Christopher J. Amenson                  Chief Executive Officer,
                                        & Director
/s/ Scott A. Alexander                                                     September  19, 1998
____________________________            Executive Vice President,          _____________________
Scott A. Alexander                      Secretary, & Director              

/s/ James E. Dixon                                                         September  19, 1998
____________________________            Vice President, Finance &          _____________________
James E. Dixon                          Administration, & Treasurer        

/s/ Warren W. Andrews                                                      September  19, 1998
____________________________            Director                           _____________________
Warren W. Andrews                       

/s/ William J. Becker                                                      September  19, 1998
____________________________            Director                           _____________________
William J. Becker

/s/ Lawrence A. Bennigson                                                  September  19, 1998
____________________________            Director                           _____________________
Lawrence A. Bennigson

/s/ Alan F. White                                                          September  19, 1998
____________________________            Director                           _____________________
Alan F. White

</TABLE>
### Proposed Provision: B5.5. Beginning for those newly eligible in 2025, reconfigure the special minimum benefit: (a) A year of coverage is defined as a year in which either 20 percent of the "old law maximum" is earned or a child is in care. Childcare years are granted to parents who have a child under 6, with a limit of 8 such years. (b) At implementation, set the PIA for 30 years of coverage equal to 133 percent of the Census monthly poverty level (about $1,556 in 2022). For those with under 30 years of coverage, the PIA per year of coverage over 19 years is $1,556/11 = $141.40. (c) Index the initial PIA per year of coverage by wage growth for successive cohorts. (d) Scale work requirements for disabled workers, based on the number of years of non-disabled potential work.

back
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 241 (Friday, December 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 64467]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30574]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION


Aviation Proceedings; Agreements Filed During the Week Ending 12/ 
8/95

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the provisions of 49 U.S.C 412 and 414. Answers 
may be filed within 21 days of date of filing.
Docket Number: OST-95-902
Date filed: December 4, 1995
Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association
Subject:
    TC23 Reso/P 0725 dated December 1, 1995 r1-8
    TC23 Reso/P 0728 dated December 1, 1995 r9-15
    Expedited Middle East-TC3 resos
    Intended effective date: expedited January 31/February 1, 1996

Docket Number: OST-95-903
Date filed: December 4, 1995
Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association
Subject:
    TC23 Reso/P 0715 dated November 24, 1995 r1-6
    TC23 Reso/P 0716 dated November 24, 1995 r7
    TC23 Reso/P 0717 dated November 24, 1995 r8-9
    Europe-Japan/Korea Expedited Resos
    Intended effective date: expedited January 15, 1996

Docket Number: OST-95-904
Date filed: December 4, 1995
Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association
Subject:
    TC2 Reso/P 1871 dated December 1, 1995 r1
    TC2 Reso/P 1872 dated December 1, 1995 r2-7
    Expedited Middle East-Africa resos
    Intended effective date: expedited January 14/15, 1996

Docket Number: OST-95-913
Date filed: December 6, 1995
Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association
Subject:
    TC23 Reso/P 0722 dated December 1, 1995 r1
    TC23 Reso/P 0723 dated December 1, 1995 r2-6
    Expedited Africa-TC3 resos
    Intended effective date: expedited January 31/February 1, 1996
Paulette V. Twine,
Chief, Documentary Services Division.
[FR Doc. 95-30574 Filed 12-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered PublicAccounting Firm**

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-14363;Form S-8 No. 333-19141; Form S-8 No. 333-24329; Form S-8No. 333-35701; Form S-8 No. 333-81783; Form S-8 No. 333-92711;Form S-8 No. 333-48376; Form S-8 No. 333-09090; Form S-8No. 333-09092; Form S-8 No. 333-11036; Form S-8 No. 333-68218,Form S-8 No. 333-101048, Form S-8 No. 333-100730, Form S-8No. 333-100729,  Form S-8 No. 333-130804,Form S-8 No. 333-130807 and Form S-3 No. 333-91449) ofDendrite International, Inc. of our report dated January 29, 2004,with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule ofDendrite International, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003,included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,2005.

 
| /s/ Ernst & Young LLP |   |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                           |   |
| Parsippany, New Jersey         |   |
| March 16, 2006            |   |

 

----
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 0.49 1.17 14% 27%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

August 1, 2023

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Retirement Age

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: C2.3. Starting for those age 62 in 2024, index the normal retirement age (NRA) to 

maintain a constant ratio of expected retirement years (life expectancy at NRA) to potential work years 

(NRA minus 20). We assume the NRA will increase 1 month every 2 years. Also, increase the earliest 

eligibility age (EEA) by the same amount as the NRA starting for those age 62 in 2024 so as to maintain a 

5 year difference between the two ages. Include a "hardship exemption" with no EEA/NRA change for a 

worker with 25 years of earnings (with 4 quarters of coverage each), and average indexed monthly 

earnings (AIME) less than 250 percent of the poverty level (wage-indexed from 2013). The hardship 

exemption is phased out for those with AIME above 400 percent of the poverty level.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision
#### CLAUDE STRICKLAND v. W. H. SMITH, Trading as BLOUNT FLORAL COMPANY (BLOUNT FLOWER SHOP, INC.), and W. H. SMITH, Personally.

(Filed 18 September, 1946.)

Automobiles § 22—

Where, in an action by a passenger in an automobile to recover for injuries sustained in collision with a truck, there is no evidence upon which contributory negligence of the driver of the car can be imputed to the plaintiff, a peremptory instruction in plaintiff’s favor upon the issue of contributory negligence is without error.

Appeal by the corporate defendant from *Bone, J.,*at April Term, 1946, of Nash. No error.

Motion for judgment of nonsuit as to *W.*TL Smith individually was sustained. There was verdict in favor of plaintiff on issues submitted, and from judgment thereon the corporate defendant appealed.

*Cooley & May for plaintiff, appellee.*

*Wilkinson & King for defendant, appellant.*

Devin, J.

This case and the case of *Kennedy v. Smith, ante,*514, grew out of the same facts, and the two cases were tried together. The facts are set out in the *Kennedy case.*However, it appeared in this case that plaintiff Strickland was a passenger in the automobile driven by Kennedy at the time of the collision with defendant’s truck. There was no evidence upon which contributory negligence could be imputed to this plaintiff, and the court properly so instructed the jury.

An examination of the other assignments of error brought forward in defendant’s appeal fails to disclose prejudicial error. In the trial we find

No error.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 330 

To appropriate amounts to the Department of Veterans Affairs to fund 

State home construction projects that have been approved before the 

date of the enactment of this Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2021 

Mr. WICKER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To appropriate amounts to the Department of Veterans Affairs to fund State home construction projects that have 

been approved before the date of the enactment of this 

Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State Veterans Homes 

5 Relief Act of 2021’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 330 IS

1 SEC. 2. APPROPRIATION OF AMOUNTS TO DEPARTMENT OF 

2 VETERANS AFFAIRS FOR STATE HOME RE3 LIEF. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—There is appropriated to the De5 partment of Veterans Affairs, out of amounts in the 

6 Treasury not otherwise appropriated, $500,000,000 to 

7 fund projects on the grant program priority list for con8 struction of State homes under subchapter III of chapter 

9 81 of title 38, United States Code, that are approved by 

10 the Secretary of Veterans Affairs before the date of the 

11 enactment of this Act. 

12 (b) SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT.—The amount ap13 propriated by subsection (a) shall supplement and not sup14 plant amounts appropriated or otherwise made available 

15 before the date of the enactment of this Act for the pur16 poses described in such subsection. 

17 (c) AVAILABILITY OF AMOUNTS.— 

18 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amount appropriated by 

19 subsection (a) shall remain available until December 

20 31, 2021. 

21 (2) REMAINDER TO TREASURY.—Any amounts 

22 appropriated by subsection (a) that are available 

23 after December 31, 2021, shall be deposited in the 

24 general fund of the Treasury. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 330 IS

1 (d) STATE HOME DEFINED.—In this section, the 

2 term ‘‘State home’’ has the meaning given that term in 

3 section 101(19) of title 38, United States Code. 

4 SEC. 3. EMERGENCY DESIGNATION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The amounts provided under this 

6 Act are designated as an emergency requirement pursuant 

7 to section 4(g) of the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 

8 2010 (2 U.S.C. 933(g)). 

9 (b) DESIGNATION IN SENATE.—In the Senate, this 

10 Act is designated as an emergency requirement pursuant 

11 to section 4112(a) of H. Con. Res. 71 (115th Congress), 

12 the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 

13 2018. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 0.67 0.80 19% 18%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

September 15, 2023

Category of Change: Coverage of Employment or Earnings, or Inclusion of Other Sources of Revenue

Summary Measures and Graphs

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: F6. Apply a separate 6.2 percent tax on investment income as defined in the 

Affordable Care Act (ACA), with unindexed thresholds as in the ACA ($200,000 for single filer, $250,000 

for married filing jointly), starting in 2025. Proceeds go to the OASI and DI Trust Funds.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision
## Get Ready For Baby (En español)

Social Security is with you from day one, which makes us *the* source for the most popular baby names and more!

Learn How to Get Baby's First NumberWhat Every Parent Should Know

Subscribe to Baby Names

### Top 10 Baby Names of 2023

### View Popularity of Names By:

Change in popularityTop 5 namesDecadeStateU.S. territories

### Items of Interest

### Popular Names by Birth Year

Enter the Year and Popularity for a List of the Most Popular Names

Any year after 1879

  Birth Year

Top 20Top 50Top 100Top 500Top 1000  Popularity

### Popularity of a Name

See How the Popularity of a Name has Changed Over Time!

 Name

2020 & later2000 & later1980 & later1960 & later1940 & later1920 & later1900 & later  Years

### Open Your Personal mySocial Security Account

Open an account today to view estimates of the retirement, disability, and survivors benefits you and your growing family may be eligible for in the future. Already receiving benefits? Use your account to check and manage your benefits, and much more!

Create Your Account

### See How Social Security Protects Your Family

We offer a wide range of resources for families with children. When a parent becomes disabled or dies, we have programs and benefits to help secure the family's financial future.

Benefits for ChildrenParents and Guardians

### Related Links

                  - Background Information
                  - Plan Your Family's Financial Security
                  - Calculate Your Retirement Benefits
                  - Future Financial Status of Social Security

### Other Sites of Interest

                  - Healthy Pregnancy
                  - Caring for Your Newborn
                  - Childhood Immunizations
                  - Food Stamps and WIC

Footer menu
Opinion issued November 21, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-22-00938-CV

———————————

IN RE BAYWATER DRILLING, LLC, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On July 13, 2023, real parties in interest, Paula Crofford, Individually, and 

as Personal Representative of the Estate of Anthony Crofford, and Hunter Crofford 

and Julianna Crofford, filed a letter advising the Court that the parties had reached 

a tentative settlement and were finalizing settlement documents.1 On October 26, 

1 The underlying case is Paul Crofford, Individually, and as Personal 

Representative of the Estate of Anthony Crofford, Hunter Crofford, and Julianna 

Crofford v. Baywater Drilling, LLC and Hilcorp Energy Company, cause number 
2

2023, relator, Baywater Drilling, LLC, filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the 

petition for writ of mandamus and the motion to stay.

We grant relator’s motion and dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus. 

All pending motions, including the motion for an emergency stay, are dismissed as 

moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Landau, and Farris.

2021-11752, pending in the 80th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the 

Honorable Jeralyn Manor presiding.
United States Southern Command

Attn: SCSJA-FOIA

9301 NW 33rd St

Doral, Fl 33172

Dear United States Southern Command FOIA manager:

This is a request under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. § 552). I request that a copy of the 

following records (or documents containing the following information) be provided to me: [identify the 

information or documents as specifically as possible].

In order to help you determine my status for the purpose of assessing fees, you should know that I am 

[insert one of the descriptions below]

• a representative of the news media affiliated with the _______ newspaper (magazine, television 

station, etc.), and this request is made as part of news gathering and not for a commercial use.

• affiliated with an educational or noncommercial scientific institution and this request is made for 

a scholarly or scientific purpose and not for a commercial use.

• affiliated with a private business and am seeking information for use in the company’s business.

• an individual seeking information for personal use and not for a commercial use.

I am willing to pay fees for this request up to a maximum of $___. If you estimate that the fees will 

exceed this limit, please inform me first.

I also include a telephone number at which I can be contacted if necessary to discuss any aspect of my 

request.

Sincerely,

[Name]

[Address]

[City, State, Zip Code]

[Telephone number]
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 -0.42 -0.56 -12% -13%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

August 1, 2023

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Cost-of-Living Adjustment

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: A6. Starting December 2025, compute the COLA using the Consumer Price Index for 

the Elderly (CPI-E). We estimate this new computation will increase the annual COLA by about 0.2 

percentage point, on average.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision
1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP

425 Lexington Ave

New York, NY 10017

Exhibit C 

EXPENSE SUMMARY FOR THE PERIOD

OCTOBER 1, 2019 THROUGH OCTOBER 31, 2019

Expenses Amounts

Court Fees $0

Research $28,559.56

Online Research $28,485.44

Document Retrieval $74.12

Meals $52.63

Travel $1,256.07

Airfare $285.01

Hotel $0

Out-of-Town Travel $470.27

OT – Carfare and Travel $218.92

Local Travel $281.87

Duplicating $4.10

Courier and Postage $641.12

Conferencing/Communication $917.50

Total Expenses Requested: $31,430.98

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5221-3 Filed: 12/30/19 Entered: 12/30/19 11:41:14 Page 1

of 1