7578 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 8, 1995 / Notices

interested agencies, organizations, and

individuals to provide comments on the

issues which should be addressed in the

EIS.

DATES: Written comments regarding the

scope of the EIS should be received on

or before March 10, 1995. A scoping

workshop will be held on February 22,

1995.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should

be addressed to Mr. Curt Smitch; U.S.

Fish and Wildlife Service; 3773 Martin

Way East; Building C, Suite 101;

Olympia, Washington 98501. Comments

received will be available for public

inspection by appointment during

normal business hours (8:00 a.m. to 5:00

p.m., Monday through Friday). A

scoping workshop will be held from

6:00–9:00 p.m. at the Bellevue Red Lion

Hotel; Overlake Room; 300 112th

Avenue S.E.; Bellevue, Washington

98004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

William Vogel, Wildlife Biologist; U.S.

Fish and Wildlife Service; 3773 Martin

Way East; Building C, Suite 101;

Olympia, Washington 98501, (360) 534–

9330.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

applicant has launched an effort to

address species conservation and

ecosystem management on

approximately 171,000 acres of private

land in the Cascade Mountains of

Washington. The subject ownership

occurs in a ‘‘checkerboard’’ pattern in

an area commonly referred to as the I–

90 Corridor. The term ‘‘checkerboard’’

refers to alternate sections of public and

private land. This effort will include the

development of a Habitat Conservation

Plan (HCP) and application for an

incidental take permit as authorized

under section 10 of the Act. The

applicant intends to request permits for

the incidental take of the northern

spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina)

which would occur as a result of timber

harvest within a portion of the owl sites

present on the subject property. There

are currently more than 100 owl sites

present within the larger 419,000-acre

planning area.

The applicant plans to avoid the take

of marbled murrelets (Brachyramphus

marmoratus marmoratus), but will

likely include murrelets in the

incidental-take permit application in the

event take occurs accidentally. The

applicant also plans to include grizzly

bear (Ursus arctos = U.a. horribilis) and

gray wolf (Canis lupus) in the permit

application to cover circumstances

where these species may occur on the

subject property in the future and may

at some point be subject to disturbance.

The applicant is also addressing

numerous other species in the HCP and

intends to request an unlisted species

agreement.

As a further opportunity for interested

persons to comment on these and other

issues associated with this planning

effort, a scoping workshop is scheduled

for 6:00–9:00 p.m. on February 22, 1995.

The workshop location will be the

Overlake Room of the Bellevue Red Lion

Hotel, 300 112th Avenue S.E.; Bellevue,

Washington 98004.

Interested parties may contact the

Service at the address listed above to

receive additional information,

including a map for the workshop

location.

Dated: February 1, 1995.

Thomas Dwyer,

Deputy Regional Director.

[FR Doc. 95–3079 Filed 2–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–55–P

Intent To Prepare a Programmatic

Environmental Impact Statement for

the Application of the Coastal Barrier

Resources Act to the Pacific Coast

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,

Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: This notice advises the public

that the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS)

intends to gather information to prepare

a programmatic Environmental Impact

Statement (EIS) on the application of the

Coastal Barrier Resources Act (CBRA)

on the Pacific coast. The National

Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)

Regulations (40 CFR 1501.7) require

publication of a notice to inform other

agencies and the public on the scope of

issues to be addressed and identified in

the EIS. All previous public comments

received by the FWS during the review

of the 1993 Draft Coastal Barriers Study,

conducted according to Section 6 of the

Coastal Barrier Improvement Act of

1990, will be considered part of the

information gathering process for this

EIS.

Changes to individual mapped coastal

barrier unit boundaries that would

depict new development or structural

changes are not within the scope of this

programmatic EIS. All major issues

raised during the public review of the

1993 Draft Coastal Barriers Study and

maps regarding technical criteria used

in mapping the units have been

considered and will be addressed in the

EIS. Any future changes to individual

units in the current inventory will

require the recommendation of the

Governors or Congressional

representatives of the affected States.

Please submit recommendations or

comments on the scope of issues to be

addressed in this EIS by 45 days after

the publication of this notice.

DATES: Written comments should be

received by March 27, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be

addressed to: CBRA EIS Team Leader,

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 911 NE.

11th Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97232–

4181.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Paula Levin, U.S. Fish and Wildlife

Service, 911 NE. 11th Avenue, Portland,

Oregon 9732–4181, (503) 231–2068.

Table ‘‘A’’ provides a summary of

technical changes on the 1993 Draft

Coastal Barrier Maps of California,

Oregon, and Washington. No unit

boundary changes were made in Hawaii,

however, the EIS will address the

applicability of the technical criteria to

the coastal barriers in Hawaii, the

Pacific Islands and the other affected

States. The 1994 draft Coastal Barrier

maps can be viewed at the central

locations listed in this notice. The maps

are being provided for informational

purposes at the locations listed and only

to county planning offices in those

counties where unit boundaries were

changed.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Coastal

barriers are unique landforms that

provide protection for diverse aquatic

habitats and are the mainland’s first line

of defense against the impacts of coastal

storms and erosion.

Congress recognized the vulnerability

of coastal barriers to development by

passing the Coastal Barriers Resource

Act in 1982 (CBRA). CBRA (Pub L. 97–

348) established the Coastal Barriers

Resources System (System) that

prohibits all new Federal expenditures

and financial assistance within the units

of that System unless specifically

excepted by the Act. Congress took this

action because Federal expenditures

and financial assistance have the effect

of encouraging development of coastal

barriers. By restricting these Federal

expenditures, Congress intended to

minimize the loss of human life,

wasteful expenditure of Federal

revenues, and damage to fish, wildlife,

and other natural resources associated

with coastal barriers along the Atlantic

and Gulf of Mexico coasts.

In 1990, Congress passed the Coastal

Barrier Improvement Act (CBIA). The

CBIA (Pub. L. 101–591) tripled the size

of the System by adding coastal barriers

of the Great Lakes and additional areas

along the Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico

coasts. The System currently includes

560 units, comprising almost 1.3 million

acres and about 1,200 shoreline miles.
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 8, 1995 / Notices 7579

One hundred and ninety-five (195)

units encompassing 104,814 acres and

307 miles of shoreline on the Pacific

coast are proposed for inclusion in the

System. Of this acreage, approximately

28,400 acres consist of fastland (nonwetland area above the mean high tide

line) and 76,414 acres consist of

wetlands and other associated aquatic

habitats.

The proposal to add 195 units to the

System is the result of the CBIA’s

requiring the Secretary of the Interior

(Secretary) to prepare a study that

examines the need for protecting

undeveloped coastal barriers along the

Pacific coast of the United States,

through inclusion in the System. This

area includes the States of California,

Hawaii, Oregon, and Washington,

American Samoa, Guam, the Northern

Marianas, and all Pacific Ocean

territories and possessions of the United

States. In addition, the Secretary was

directed to prepare maps identifying the

boundaries of undeveloped coastal

barriers within this area. The Secretary

delegated the authority to develop the

Study and accompanying maps of

undeveloped coastal barriers of the

Pacific coast to the U.S. Fish and

Wildlife Service (FWS).

Notices of availability of FWSdeveloped Draft Coastal Barrier Maps

were published in the Federal Register

on April 23, 1992 (57 FR 14846), for

Oregon, May 29, 1992 (57 FR 22821), for

Washington, July 7, 1992 (57 FR 29883)

for California, and August 14, 1992 (57

FR 36668), for Hawaii. Following the

90-day public comment period, FWS

revised the draft maps to correct any

technical errors noted during the

comment period. The revised draft

maps, and all comments received, were

forwarded to appropriate State

Governors for review and comment.

The FWS developed the required

Draft Study and revised draft maps of

areas under consideration for inclusion

in the Coastal Barrier Resources System

in 1993. The FWS made the Draft Study

and maps available for a 60-day public

review and comment period on

December 17, 1993 (58 FR 66016).

Appropriate State Governors were

afforded an additional 30 days for

review and comment. On February 23,

1994, the FWS extended the public

comment period until March 25, 1994,

and for State Governors until April 25,

1994. Between January 5, 1994, and

January 18, 1994, 15 public meetings

were held in Oregon, Washington,

California, and Hawaii regarding the

draft study and accompanying maps.

Press releases were issued in all affected

areas. Mailings of the draft maps and

Study were provided to individuals and

central locations on FWS mailing lists,

supplemented by mailings lists

provided by State Coastal Zone

Management program managers.

Announcements of availability and

central locations for review of the maps

and Study were also widely distributed.

Coastal barrier units that occur on

Tribal lands were included on the 1991

draft maps but deleted from the 1993

draft maps at the request of the Tribal

sovereign nations. Neither the CBRA nor

the CBIA provides guidance regarding

the inclusion of Tribal lands in the

System. Recognizing the sovereignty of

the Native American nations, the

Department of the Interior (Department)

solicited recommendations from each

affected Tribe. These Tribal

recommendations will be submitted to

Congress with the Department’s final

EIS recommendations.

A Draft Environmental Impact

Statement (DEIS) will be available for

public for review and comment when

complete. A summary of alternatives

currently proposed for evaluation in the

EIS include:

1. No action Alternative: current

circumstances projected into the

future.

2. Implement the Act with stipulations:

(a) Apply Section 4(d) CBIA provision

to:

(1) Federal lands undergoing disposal

following inclusion of the Pacific

coastal barriers in the System,

providing, the disposal has not yet

been completed.

(2) ‘‘otherwise protected areas (and

private inholdings)’’ not in Federal

or State ownership if changes in

their status may result in their

development.

(b) Engage in appropriate Government

to Government coordination before

considering incorporation of Tribal

lands including reservations,

allotment lands, and usual and

accustomed treaty areas in the

System.

Other alternatives may be explored if

responses to scoping and further

analysis show the necessity.

Locations of Maps

All States

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,

Ecological Services, 911 N.E. 11th

Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97232–

4181; Phone: (503) 231–2068

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,

Ecological Services, 4401 N. Fairfax

Drive, Room 400, Arlington, Virginia

22203; Phone: (703) 358–2201

Hawaii

Pacific Islands Office, U.S. Fish and

Wildlife Service, 300 Ala Moana

Boulevard, Room 6307, Honolulu,

Hawaii 96813; Phone: (808) 541–2749

Hawaii Office of State Planning, State

Coastal Zone Management, 1177

Alakea Street, 2nd Floor, Honolulu,

Hawaii 96813; Phone: (808) 587–2880

Kauai National Wildlife Refuge

Complex, U.S. Fish and Wildlife

Service, Kilauea, Kauai, Hawaii

96754; Phone: (808) 828–1413

Hakalau Forest National Wildlife

Refuge, U.S. Fish and Wildlife

Service, 154 Waianuenue Avenue,

Room 219, Hilo, Hawaii 96720;

Phone: (808) 969–9909

Maui County Planning Office, Parks and

Recreation, 1580–C Kaahumanu

Avenue, Wailuku, Maui, Hawaii

96793; Phone: (808) 243–7931

Kahului Public Library, 20 School

Street, Kahului, Hawaii 96793; Phone:

(808) 877–5048

Mitchell Paole Center, 90 Inoa Street,

Kaunakakai, Molokai 96748; Phone:

(808) 553–3204

California

Carlsbad Field Office, U.S. Fish and

Wildlife Service, 2730 Loker Avenue

West, Carlsbad, California 92008;

Phone: (619) 431–9440

Ventura Field Office, U.S. Fish and

Wildlife Service, 2140 Eastman

Avenue, Suite 100, Ventura,

California 93003; Phone: (805) 644–

1766

Sacramento Field Office, U.S. Fish and

Wildlife Service, 2800 Cottage Way,

Room E–1803, Sacramento, California

95825; Phone: (916) 979–2116

San Francisco Bay National Wildlife

Refuge, U.S. Fish and Wildlife

Service, 1 Marshlands Road, Fremont,

California 94536; Phone: (510) 792–

0222

Humboldt Bay National Wildlife Refuge,

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1020

Ranch Road, Loleta, California 95551;

Phone: (707) 733–5406

California Coastal Commission, 45

Fremont, Suite 2000, San Francisco,

California 94105–2219; Phone: (415)

904–5280

California Coastal Commission

Legislative Office, 921 11th Street,

Room 1200, Sacramento, California

95814; Phone: (916) 445–6067

State of California, The Resources

Agency, 1416 9th Street, Suite 1311,

Sacramento, California 95814; Phone:

(916) 654–2506

Oregon

Portland Field Office, U.S. Fish and

Wildlife Service, 2600 S.E. 98th

Avenue, Suite 100, Portland, Oregon

97266; Phone: (503) 231–6179

Oregon Coastal Refuges, U.S. Fish and

Wildlife Service, 2030 Marine Science
7580 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 8, 1995 / Notices

Drive, Newport, Oregon 97365–5296;

Phone: (503) 867–4550

Oregon Coastal/Ocean Management

Program, Dept. of Land and

Conservation Development, 1175

Court Street NE, Salem, Oregon

97310–0590; Phone: (503) 373–0092

Bandon Public Library, P.O. Box 128,

Bandon, Oregon 97411 (located in the

Bandon City Hall on Highway 101);

Phone: (503) 347–3221

Tillamook Public Library, 210 Ivy

Avenue, Tillamook, Oregon 97141;

Phone: (503) 842–4792

Seaside Public Library, 60 N. Roosevelt

Boulevard, Seaside, Oregon 97138;

Phone: (503) 738–6742

Hatfield Marine Science Center, Guin

Library, 2030 Marine Science Drive,

Newport, Oregon 97365; Phone: (503)

867–0249

North Bend Public Library, 1800

Sherman Avenue, North Bend,

Oregon 97459; Phone: (503) 756–0400

Washington

Olympia Field Office, U.S. Fish and

Wildlife Service, 3704 Griffin Lane

SE, Suite 102, Olympia, Washington

98501–2192; Phone: (206) 753–9440

Willapa National Wildlife Refuge, U.S.

Fish and Wildlife Service, HC 01, Box

910, Ilwaco, Washington 98624–9797;

Phone: (206) 484–3482

Nisqually National Wildlife Refuge, U.S.

Fish and Wildlife Service, 100 Brown

Farm Road, Olympia, Washington

98506; Phone: (206) 753–9467

Washington Coastal Refuges, U.S. Fish

and Wildlife Service, 1638 Barr Road

South, Port Angeles, Washington

98382; Phone: (206) 457–8451

Washington Department of Ecology,

Shorelands and Coastal Management

Program, 300 Desmond Drive,

Olympia, Washington 98504; Phone:

(206) 407–7250

Dated: January 31, 1995.

Thomas Dwyer,

Acting Regional Director.

TABLE A—1994 PACIFIC COASTAL BARRIER UNIT CHANGES

[Old=1993; New=1994]

State/county Unit No.

(old/new) Unit name Action

California:

Sonoma ....................... N/A / CA–28 Bodega Bay ............................. Added unit.

San Luis Obispo .......... CA–44/CA–47 Oso Flaco Lake ........................ Extended southeast boundary to include associated aquatic

habitat. Added 24 acres of wetland.

Oregon:

Clatsop ........................ OR–02/OR–02 Necanicum River ...................... Expansion in northeast corner of unit to include associated

aquatic habitat. Added 25 acres of wetland.

Tillamook ..................... OR–04/OR–04 Nehalem Spit and Bay ............. Expansion in northeast corner of unit to include associated

aquatic habitat. Added 19 acres of wetland.

Tillamook ..................... OR–10/OR–10 Kiwanda Beach ........................ Expansion of southeast corner to include associated aquatic

habitat. Added 114 acres of wetland.

Lincoln ......................... OR–11/OR–11 Salmon River Estuary .............. Expansion to include associated aquatic habitat along Salmon

River. Added 562 acres of wetland.

Lane ............................. OR–15/OR–15 Baker Beach ............................ Expanded northern boundary to include barrier and associated

aquatic habitat. Added 0.5 miles of shoreline, 39 acres of

fastland, and 9 acres of wetland.

Coos ............................ OR–19/OR–19 North Spit and Coos Bay/Oregon Dunes.Excluded industrial waste ponds and relocated inland boundary of entire unit to wetland/upland interface at foredune.

Removed 1,066 acres of fastland and 3,256 acres of wetland.

Curry ............................ OR–25/OR–25 Euchre Creek ........................... Extended northern boundary. Added 0.1 miles of shoreline, 6

acres of fastland, and 6 acres of wetland.

Curry ............................ OR–26/OR–26 Greggs Creek ........................... Extended southern boundary. Added 0.3 miles of shoreline, 16

acres of fastland, and 4 acres of wetland.

Washington:

Whatcom ..................... WA–01/Deleted Semiahmoo Spit/Drayton Harbor.Site visit and documentation provided by property owners indicated site is developed and does not meet criteria.

Clallam ......................... WA–57/WA–51 Kilakala Point ........................... Extended southwest edge to include associated aquatic habitat at Grays Marsh Creek. Added 25 acres of wetland.

Grays Harbor ............... WA–70/WA–58 Conner Creek ........................... Added an exclusion for a structure and removed developed

portion (R.V. parking/campground area). Removed 3 acres

of fastland and 1 acre of wetland.

Grays Harbor ............... WA–71/WA–59 Ocean Shores .......................... Removed a developed portion near Oyhut. Added 0.1 miles of

shoreline and removed 2 acres of fastland and 2 acres of

wetland.

Grays Harbor ............... WA–72/WA–60 Ocean Shores South ............... Redelineated to make eastern edge more reflective of actual

barrier and extended into aquatic habitat to the north. Removed 0.1 miles of shoreline and added 583 acres of wetland.

Grays Harbor ............... WA–73/WA–61 Westport ................................... Added exclusion for parking lot and structure off of Ocean Avenue and removed additional developed area which extended into barrier unit. Removed 0.6 miles of shoreline, 16

acres of fastland, and 5 acres of wetland.

Pacific .......................... WA–79/WA–68 Long Beach/Seaview ............... Removed several developed areas which extended into barrier

unit. Removed 3 acres of fastland and 6 acres of wetland.
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 8, 1995 / Notices 7581

1The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19

CFR 207.2(f)).

2For purposes of this investigation, coumarin is

an aroma chemical with the chemical formula

C9H6O2 that also known by other names, including

2H-1-benzopyran-2-one, 1, 2-benzopyrone, cis-ocoumarinic acid lactone, coumarinic anhydride, 2-

Oxo-1, 2-benzopyran, 5, 6-benzo-alpha-pyrone,

ortho-hydroxy-cinnamic acid lactone, cis-orthocoumaric acid anhydride, and tonka bean camphor.

All forms and variations of coumarin are included

within the scope of the investigation, such as

coumarin in crystal, flake, or powder form, and

‘‘crude’’ or unrefined coumarin (i.e., prior to

purification or crystallization). Excluded from the

scope are ethylcoumarins (C11H10O2) and

methylcoumarins (C10H8O2).

[FR Doc. 95–3080 Filed 2–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–55–P

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731–TA–677 (Final)]

Coumarin from the People’s Republic

of China

Determination

On the basis of the record 1 developed

in the subject investigation, the

Commission determines, pursuant to

section 735(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930

(19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)) (the Act), that an

industry in the United States is

materially injured by reason of imports

from the People’s Republic of China of

coumarin,2 provided for in subheading

2932.21.00 of the Harmonized Tariff

Schedule of the United States, that have

been found by the Department of

Commerce to be sold in the United

States at less than fair value (LTFV).

Chairman Watson, Vice Chairman

Nuzum, and Commissioner Bragg find

that critical circumstances exist with

respect to subject imports from China.

Commissioner Rohr, Commissioner

Newquist, and Commissioner Crawford

find that critical circumstances do not

exist with respect to subject imports

from China.

Background

The Commission instituted this

investigation effective August 2, 1994,

following a preliminary determination

by the Department of Commerce that

imports of coumarin from the People’s

Republic of China were being sold at

LTFV within the meaning of section

733(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1676b(b)).

Notice of the institution of the

Commission’s investigation and of a

public hearing to be held in connection

therewith was given by posting copies

of the notice in the Office of the

Secretary, U.S. International Trade

Commission, Washington, DC, and by

publishing the notice in the Federal

Register of August 24, 1994 (59 FR

43590). The hearing was held in

Washington, DC, on December 13, 1994,

and all persons who requested the

opportunity were permitted to appear in

person or by counsel.

The Commission transmitted its

determination in this investigation to

the Secretary of Commerce on February

1, 1995. The views of the Commission

are contained in USITC Publication

2852 (February 1995), entitled

‘‘Coumarin from the People’s Republic

of China: Investigation No. 731–TA–677

(Final).’’

Issued: February 3, 1995.

By order of the Commission.

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–3141 Filed 2–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

[Investigation No. 337–TA–364]

Certain Curable Fluoroelastomer

Compositions and Precursors Thereof;

Notice of Decision not to Review Initial

Determination Finding a Violation of

Section 337 and Schedule for the Filing

of Written Submissions on Remedy,

the Public Interest, and Bondings

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade

Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that

the U.S. International Trade

Commission has determined not to

review the initial determination (ID)

issued on December 15, 1994, by the

presiding administrative law judge (ALJ)

in the above-captioned investigation

finding a violation of section 337 in the

importation into the United States and

the sale within the United States after

importation of certain curable

fluoroelastomer compositions and

precursors thereof.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mark D. Kelly, Esq., Office of the

General Counsel, U.S. International

Trade Commission, telephone 202–205–

3106. Copies of the nonconfidential

version of the ID and all other

nonconfidential documents filed in

connection with this investigation are or

will be available for inspection during

official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15

p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.

International Trade Commission, 500 E

Street S.W., Washington, D.C. 20436,

telephone 202–205–2000. Hearingimpaired persons are advised that

information on the matter can be

obtained by contacting the

Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–

205–1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March

16, 1994, the Commission instituted an

investigation of a complaint filed by

Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing

Company (‘‘3M’’) under section 337 of

the Tariff Act of 1930. The complaint

alleged that Ausimont, S.p.A., of Milan,

Italy, and Ausimont U.S.A., Inc., of

Morristown, NJ, imported, sold for

importation, or sold in the United States

after importation certain curable

fluoroelastomer compositions and

precursors thereof that infringed certain

claims of U.S. Letters Patent 4,287,320

(‘‘the ’320 patent’’). The Commission’s

notice of investigation named as

respondents Ausimont Italy and

Ausimont U.S.A., each of which was

alleged to have committed one or more

unfair acts in the importation or sale of

curable fluoroelastomer compositions

and precursors thereof that infringe

claims of the asserted patent.

The ALJ conducted an evidentiary

hearing commencing on September 23,

1994, and issued his final ID on

December 15, 1994. He found that: (1)

The ’320 patent is not invalid; (2)

respondents’ imported products infringe

the claims in issue of the ’320 patent;

and (3) complainant 3M satisfied the

economic requirements for existence of

a domestic industry. Based upon his

findings of validity, infringement, and

domestic industry, the ALJ concluded

that there was a violation of section 337.

Respondents filed a petition for

review of the ALJ’s findings on the

questions of validity of the ’320 patent

and infringement. Complainant and the

Commission investigative attorneys

filed responses to the petition for

review. No other petitions for review of

the ID or government comments were

received by the Commission.

In connection with final disposition

of this investigation, the Commission

may issue (1) an order that could result

in the exclusion of the subject articles

from entry into the United States, and/

or (2) cease and desist orders that could

result in respondents being required to

cease and desist from engaging in unfair

acts in the importation and sale of such

articles. Accordingly, the Commission is

interested in receiving written

submissions that address the form of

remedy, if any, that should be ordered.

If a party seeks exclusion of an article

from entry into the United States for

purposes other than entry for

consumption, the party should so

indicate and provide information

establishing that activities involving

other types of entry either are adversely

affecting it or are likely to do so. For