alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 27 (Thursday, February 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7796]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3276]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Public Information Collection Requirement Submitted to OMB for 
Review

Date: January 26, 1995.
    The National Credit Union Administration submitted the following 
public information collection requirement to OMB for review and 
clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Pub. L. 96-511. 
Copies of the submission may be obtained by calling the NCUA Clearance 
Officer listed. Comments regarding information collections should be 
addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the NCUA Clearance Officer, 
NCUA, Office of Administration, Room 4009, 1775 Duke Street, 
Alexandria, VA 22314-3428.

National Credit Union Administration

    OMB Number: 3133-004
    Form Number: NCUA 5300 and NCUA 5300S
    Type of Review: Reinstatement, with change, of previously approved 
collection.
    Title: Semiannual and Quarterly Financial and Statistical Report.
    Description: The financial and operational information collected is 
essential to NCUA in carrying out its responsibility for supervising 
federal credit unions. The information also enables NCUA to monitor 
federal credit unions and those credit unions, federal and state, whose 
share accounts are insured by the National Credit Union Share Insurance 
Fund (NCUSIF).
    Proposed changes to the 5300 Call Report are primarily in response 
to the increasing risks and complexity associated with today's 
investment environment and practices. On the Call Report Investment 
Schedule a new section has been added for reporting the aggregates of 
investments that are classified as Held-to-Maturity, Available-for-
Sale, and Trading. These classifications are required for compliance 
with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 115. To the Call 
Report balance sheet has been added a line for reporting accumulated 
unrealized gains (losses) on available for sale securities. Also, a new 
line has been added to the Investment Schedule, under the Miscellaneous 
section, for the amount of investment in mortgage derivative products 
that are defined as high risk securities per NCUA's Interpretive Ruling 
and Policy Statement 92-1.
    Respondents: All credit unions.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 12,300
    Estimated Burden Hours per Response: 8 hours.
    Frequency of Response: Quarterly and semiannually.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 235,200 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Wilmer A. Theard (703) 518-6410, National Credit 
Union Administration, Room 4009, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 
22314-3428.
    OMB Reviewer: Milo Sunderhauf (202) 395-5167, Office of Management 
and Budget, Room 3208, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 
20503.
Becky Baker,
Secretary of the NCUA Board.
[FR Doc. 95-3276 Filed 2-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 246 (Friday, December 22, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66577-66578]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31166]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Proposed Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment 
Request

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury, as part of its continuing 
effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general 
public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment 
on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C. 
3506(c)(2)(A)). Currently, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms 
within the Department of the Treasury is soliciting comments concerning 
the Formula For Distilled Spirits Under the Federal Alcohol 
Administration Act.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before February 20, 
1996 to be assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco 
and Firearms, Linda Barnes, 650 Massachusetts Avenue NW., Washington, 
DC 20226, (202) 927-7768.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or 
copies of the form(s) and instructions should be directed to Roberta 
Sanders, 

[[Page 66578]]
Product Compliance Branch, 650 Massachusetts Avenue NW., Washington, DC 
20226, (202) 927-8116.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Title: Formula For Distilled Spirits Under the Federal Alcohol 
Administration Act.
    OMB Number: 1512-0204.
    Form Number: ATF F 5110.38.
    Abstract: ATF F 5110.38 is used to determine the classification of 
distilled spirits for labeling and for consumer protection. This form 
describes the person filing, type of product to be made and 
restrictions to labeling and manufacturing. The form is used by ATF to 
ensure that a product is made and labeled properly and to audit 
distilled spirits operations.
    Current Actions: There are no changes to this information 
collection and it is being submitted for extension purposes only.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 200.
    Estimated Time Per Respondent: one hour.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 4,000.

REQUEST FOR COMMENTS: Comments submitted in response to this notice 
will be summarized and/or included in the request for OMB approval. All 
comments will become a matter of public record. Written comments should 
address the accuracy of the burden estimates and ways to minimize 
burden including the use of automated collection techniques or the use 
of other forms of information technology, as well as other relevant 
aspects of the information collection request.

    Date: December 15, 1995.
John W. Magaw,
Director.
[FR Doc. 95-31166 Filed 12-21-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

      ( print page 5993)    

# Time and Date: 

Wednesday February 10, 2016, 10:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m.

# Place: 

Room 837-C, Enter on the Fourth Floor, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland.

# Status: 

Commission Meeting—Open to the Public.

# Matter to be Considered: 

*Briefing Matter:*                         Fiscal Year 2016 Operating Plan.                    

                        A live webcast of the Meeting can be viewed at                         *www.cpsc.gov/​live.*

# Contact Person for More Information: 

Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

Dated: February 2, 2016.

Todd A. Stevenson,

Secretariat.

[FR Doc. 2016-02227 Filed 2-2-16; 11:15 am]

 BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
## Summary Measures and Graphs

- Individual Provisions
- Family Members

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						D4: Establish an alternative benefit for a surviving spouse. For the surviving spouse, the alternative benefit would equal 75 percent of the sum of the survivor's own worker benefit and the deceased worker's PIA (including any actuarial reductions or delayed retirement credits). If the deceased worker died before becoming entitled, use the age 62 actuarial reduction if deceased before age 62, or the applicable actuarial reduction/DRC for entitlement at the age of death if deceased after 62. The alternative benefit would not exceed the PIA of a hypothetical earner who earns the SSA average wage index (AWI) every year, and who becomes eligible for retired-worker benefits in the same year in which the deceased worker became entitled to worker benefits or died (if before entitlement). The alternative benefit would be paid only if more than the current-law benefit. This benefit would be available to surviving spouses on the rolls at the beginning of 2025 and those becoming eligible after 2024.**

|  |  |
|--|--|
#### S. G. MORRIS and MAGGIE MORRIS, His Wife, v. R. L. LAMBETH.

(Filed 14 December, 1932.)

Evidence K b — Admission of opinion, based on observation, as to cause of break in dam held not error in this case.

In this case the question involved was whether the defendant’s dam had been negligently constructed and maintained, and the defendant offered as a witness the foreman who had constructed the dam who testified as to its construction and that he had examined it after the break, the witness was then allowed to testify that he had an opinion satisfactory to himself as to the cause of the break and that the break was caused by some manner of explosion: *Bela,*the opinion evidence was competent under the rule that common observers may testify to the results of their observations made at the time in regard to common appearances, conditions, etc., which cannot be reproduced and made palpable to a jury.

Civil action, before *Finley, J.,*at July Term, 1932, of Randolph.

Tbe plaintiffs alleged and offered evidence tending to show tbat on 28 February, 1929, tbey were owners of certain lands, and tbat on said date a dam, erected by tbe defendant on lands owned by bim and adjoining tbe lands of plaintiff, broke, flooding about forty acres of bottom land and otherwise damaging tbe property of plaintiffs. It was alleged tbat tbe dam was negligently constructed and maintained, and tbat by reason thereof *the*break resulted, occasioning tbe injury complained of.

Tbe defendant alleged and offered evidence tending to show tbat tbe dam was properly constructed and maintained.

Tbe issue of negligence was answered in favor of defendant, and from judgment upon tbe verdict tbe plaintiff appealed.

*H. M. Robins for plaintiff.*

*I. C. Moser for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

Tbe defendant offered the testimony of a witness who was the foreman in charge of the work of constructing the dam. He testified in detail as to the construction of the dam, and tbat on the day after the break be examined it. Thereupon be was asked if be bad an opinion, satisfactory to himself, as'to the cause of the break, and replying in the affirmative, stated tbat the break was caused by some “manner of explosion.” Tbe witness further testified as to the facts observable in and about the broken dam upon which bis opinion was based. Tbe plaintiff objected to the testimony, and assigned the admission thereof by the trial judge, for error. This testimony is within *696the principle approved in *Britt v. R. R.,*148 N. C., 37, 61 S. E., 601, as follows: “The exception to the general rule that witnesses cannot give opinions is not confined to the evidence of experts testifying on subjects requiring special knowledge, skill or learning, but it includes the evidence of common observers testifying the results of their observations made at the time in regard to common appearances, facts and conditions which cannot be reproduced and made palpable to a jury.” This statement of law was approved in *Marshall v. Tel. Co.,*181 N. C., 292, 106 S. E., 818.

The merits of the controversy involve an issue of fact, and the verdict is determinative.

Affirmed.
#### William Jackson, Respondent, v. George D. Eighmie, Appellant.

Judgment of County Court and j ustice reversed, with costs. Opinion by

Dykman, J .
## Organization of the Office of Chief Actuary

- Organization
- Actuarial employment at SSA
- Actuarial organizations

Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust FundDisability Insurance Trust Fund
In addition, the Office is charged with conducting cost analyses     relating to the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program, a general-revenue      financed, means-tested program for low-income aged, blind and disabled people.     The Office provides technical and consultative services to the Commissioner,     to the Board of Trustees of the Social Security Trust Funds, and its     staff appears before Congressional Committees to provide expert testimony     on the actuarial aspects of Social Security issues.
actuary@ssa.gov
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-10385 Conference Calendar

ARMANDO HERRERA SALCIDO, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JOHN W. STICKELS, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:96-CV-96-C

- - - - - - - - - - August 15, 1997 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Armando Herrera Salcido (#553772), a state prisoner, has appealed the dismissal of his civil rights action as frivolous. Salcido contends that defendant, John W. Stickels, acted with deliberate indifference to his psychiatric condition. See Hare v. City of Corinth , 74 F.3d 633, 649-50 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc). We have carefully reviewed the record and Salcido’s brief, and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the complaint as frivolous.No. 97-10385 -2- Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. We caution Salcido that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions Salcido is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous.
APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
#### T. E. COX v. THE ATLANTIC JOINT STOCK LAND BANK OF RALEIGH.

(Filed 23 November, 1932.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *Warlich, J.,*at June Term, 1932, of ElCHMOND.

Civil action to recover $350.07 for lumber sold and delivered the defendant. The defendant set up in defense that a cheek for $340.52, drawn on the Commercial National Bank of Ealeigh, N. O., was sent to the plaintiff 20 November, 1931, and was not deposited in time to be paid before the failure of said bank on 16 December following. A credit for this amount was thereafter demanded.

There was a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff for $9.55, from which the plaintiff appeals, assigning errors.

*J. G. Sedberry for plaintiff.*

*J. L. Cockerham and McLean & Stacy for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

The case seems to have been tried agreeably to the principles of law applicable and the decisions apposite. The record discloses no reversible error. Hence, the verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 21

                                  SUBSIDIARIES

1.  Dendrite Delaware, Inc., a Delaware corporation
2.  Dendrite Corporate Services, Inc., a New Jersey corporation
3.  Dendrite UK Ltd., organized under the laws of the United Kingdom
4.  Dendrite Japan K.K., organized under the laws of Japan
5.  Dendrite Pty. Ltd., organized under the laws of Australia
6.  Dendrite (New Zealand) Ltd., organized under the laws of New Zealand
7.  Dendrite Netherlands, B.V., organized under the laws of the Netherlands
8.  Dendrite France, S.A., organized under the laws of France
9.  Dendrite Italia, S.r.l., organized under the laws of Italy
10. Dendrite (Deutschland) GmbH, organized under the laws of Germany
11. Dendrite Brasil Ltda., organized under the laws of Brazil
12. Dendrite Financial Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation
13. Dendrite Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation
14. Dendrite Portugal, organized under the laws of Portugal
15. Dendrite Belgium S.A., organized under the laws of Belgium
16. Associated Business Computing N.V., organized under the laws of Belgium
17. Adem Information N.V., organized under the laws of Belgium
EXHIBIT 13.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Tongjitang Chinese Medicines Company (the Company) on Form 20-F for
the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Xiaochun Wang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: June 30, 2008



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Xiaochun Wang      
|Name:  |  | Xiaochun Wang          
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
#### SWIFT & COMPANY v. J. W. BRINSON.

(Filed 14 September, 1927.)

Civil aotioN before *Daniels, J.,*at March Term, 1927, of CueeitucK. . The plaintiffs brought a suit against the defendant upon a note for $296.69, dated 3 February, 1923. The note was given for the purchase price of fertilizer for sweet potatoes.

The defendant alleged that the fertilizer furnished by the plaintiffs was absolutely worthless and of no value or benefit to the crops:

The evidence disclosed that the defendant had executed an original note to the plaintiffs in payment of said fertilizer in the year 1922, and that the note upon which suit was brought was a renewal thereof. It further appeared that the crop matured in July or August, 1922.

The following issue was submitted to the jury: Did the plaintiffs fail to deliver to the defendant commercial fertilizer of the analysis guaranteed on the bag in accordance with their contract ? The jury answered the issue, “Yes.”

The trial judge declined to sign judgment for the defendant, but, upon the admissions in the record, entered judgment for the plaintiffs, from which judgment the defendant appealed.

*Ehringhaus & Hall for plaintiffs.*

*Aydlett & Simpson for defendant.*

Pee Cueiam.

This case is governed by the rules of law announced in the companion case of *Barco v. Forbes, ante,*204.

Judgment affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 248 (Wednesday, December 27, 1995)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 66855]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31437]





                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 248 / Wednesday, December 27, 1995 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 66855]]

                Executive Order 12983 of December 21, 1995

                
Amendment to Executive Order No. 12871

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, and in order to improve the functioning of the 
                National Partnership Council, it is hereby ordered that 
                Executive Order No. 12871, entitled ``Labor-Management 
                Partnerships,'' (``the order'') is amended as follows:

                Section 1. Section 1(a) of the order is amended to 
                delete ``and'' at the end of item (9), delete the 
                period at the end of item (10), add ``; and'' at the 
                end of item (10), and add item ``(11) one elected 
                office holder each from both the Senior Executives 
                Association and the Federal Managers Association.''

                Sec. 2. Section 1(b) of the order is amended to delete 
                ``and'' at the end of item (4), delete the period at 
                the end of item (5), add ``; and'' at the end of item 
                (5), and add ``(6) reporting to the President by 
                October 1996 on the progress of and results achieved 
                through labor-management partnership throughout the 
                executive branch.''

                Sec. 3. Section 1(c)(2) of the order is revised to 
                read: ``(2) The Council shall seek input from nonmember 
                Federal agencies, particularly smaller agencies. It 
                also may, from time to time, invite experts from the 
                private and public sectors to submit information. The 
                Council shall also seek input from Federal manager and 
                professional associations, companies, nonprofit 
                organizations, State and local governments, Federal 
                employees, and customers of Federal services, as 
                needed.''

                Sec. 4. Section 1(c)(4) of the order is revised to 
                read: ``(4) Members of the Council shall serve without 
                compensation for their work on the Council, but may be 
                allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of 
                subsistence, as authorized by law, for persons serving 
                intermittently in Government service.''

                    (Presidential Sig.)<Clinton1><Clinton2>

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    December 21, 1995.

[FR Doc. 95-31437
Filed 12-22-95; 2:41 pm]
Billing code 3195-01-P
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________
No. 22

- 11967

Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus DONOVAN EXUME,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 0:21

- cr

- 60268

- WPD

- 1

____________________ USCA11 Case: 22-11967 Document: 31-1 Date Filed: 04/05/2023 Page: 1 of 22 Opinion of the Co urt 22

- 11967

Before B RANCH , G RANT , and A NDERSON , Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: Donovan Exume appeals his 181

- month total sentence for carjacking, brandishing a firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence, attempted Hobbs Act robbery, and attempted carjacking. The government has filed a motion to dismiss Exume’s appeal based on the sentence appeal waiver in his plea agreement. Exume’s appeal waiver is enforceable, as the record shows that he knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal and none of the waiver exceptio ns apply. See United States v. Bushert
, 997 F.2d 1343, 1350

– 51 (11th Cir. 1993). The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal waiver in
Exume ’s plea agreement is therefore GRANTED. USCA11 Case: 22-11967 Document: 31-1 Date Filed: 04/05/2023 Page: 2 of 2