alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lionbridge Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Rory J. Cowan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Stephen J. Lifshatz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: November 5, 2004



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ RORY J. COWAN      
|Rory J. Cowan          
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|/s/ STEPHEN J. LIFSHATZ
|Stephen J. Lifshatz    
|Chief Financial Officer



1
## Summary Measures and Graphs

- Individual Provisions
- Retirement Age

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						C2.2: Starting for those age 62 in 2024, index the normal retirement age (NRA) to maintain a constant ratio of expected retirement years (life expectancy at NRA) to potential work years (NRA minus 20). We assume the NRA will increase 1 month every 2 years. Also, raise the earliest eligibility age (EEA) for retired-workers, aged widow(er)s, and disabled widow(er)s by the same amount as the NRA starting for those attaining 62 in 2024.**

|  |  |
|--|--|
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 0.54 0.73 15% 17%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

September 15, 2023

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Level of Monthly Benefits

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: B7.7. Reduce individual Social Security benefits if modified adjusted gross income, or 

MAGI (AGI less taxable Social Security benefits plus nontaxable interest income) is above $60,000 for 

single taxpayers or $120,000 for taxpayers filing jointly. This provision is effective for individuals newly 

eligible for benefits in 2028 or later. The percentage reduction increases linearly up to 50 percent for 

single/joint filers with MAGI of $180,000/$360,000 or above. Index the MAGI thresholds for years after 

2028, based on changes in the SSA average wage index.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40793 Summary Calendar

JAMES PHILLIP HARRISON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JOHN E. SHERMAN, Attorney at Law, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:93-CV-211

- - - - - - - - - - June 12, 1998 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * James Phillip Harrison, federal prisoner # 74580-012, appeals the dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction of his federal complaint on the ground that diversity of citizenship was lacking under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1). Harrison has not demonstrated plain error with respect to his argument that the district court erred in dismissing his complaint for lack of diversity of citizenship. See Highlands Ins. Co. v. NationalNo. 97-40793 -2- Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh , 27 F.3d 1027, 1031-32 (5th Cir. 1994); Mas v. Perry , 489 F.2d 1396, 1399 (5th Cir. 1974);

see Stine v. Moore , 213 F.2d 446, 448 (5th Cir. 1954). Nor has Harrison demonstrated plain error with respect to his argument that he was entitled to notice prior to the magistrate judge's dismissal of his compliant. See Stanley v. Central Intelligence Agency , 639 F.2d 1146, 1159 (5th Cir. 1981).
AFFIRMED.
### Proposed Provision: B7.11. Beginning in January 2026, eliminate the retirement earnings test for all beneficiaries under normal retirement age, including retired workers, aged spouses, aged widow(er)s, young spouses with a child in care, young surviving spouses with a child in care, and children.

back
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Solvency provisions | Summary Measures and Graphs |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|

| Taxation of Benefits | Description of Proposed Provision:      Tax Social Security benefits in a manner similar to private pension income beginning in 2009.  Phase out the lower-income thresholds during 2009-2018. |
|----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |

*Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions        of the 2008 Trustees Report*

|  |  |
|--|--|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified July 16, 2008 |
## Summary Measures and Graphs

- Individual Provisions
- Level of Monthly Benefits

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						B1.2: Progressive price indexing (30th percentile) of PIA factors beginning with individuals newly eligible for OASDI benefits in 2030: Create a new bend point at the 30th percentile of the AIME distribution of newly retired workers. Maintain current-law benefits for earners at the 30th percentile and below. Reduce the 32 and 15 percent factors above the 30th percentile such that the initial benefit for a worker with AIME equal to the taxable maximum grows by inflation rather than the growth in the SSA average wage index.**

|  |  |
|--|--|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-29-2000
<CASH>                                       1,995,610
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,210,035
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (60,000)
<INVENTORY>                                 68,727,528
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            78,430,490
<PP&E>                                      42,881,145
<DEPRECIATION>                             (20,209,760)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             105,656,398
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       69,743,623
<BONDS>                                     41,856,131
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        92,825
<OTHER-SE>                                  65,440,135
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               105,656,398
<SALES>                                    192,928,109
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                      117,295,771
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,841,501
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,168,182
<INCOME-TAX>                                   124,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,044,182
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,044,182
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10


</TABLE>
#### Franklin Bassford, Respondent, v. Herman Oelrichs, Appellant.

Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs.

Opinion by

Pratt, J.
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Stakool, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the nine month period ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kyle Gotshalk, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and   (2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date:  May 1, 2011By: /s/ Kyle GotshalkKyle GotshalkPrincipal Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), the undersigned
sole director of S Wind-up Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter year ended June 30, 2004, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the Periodic Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Periodic
Report and results of operations for the Company for periods covered by the Periodic Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ IRV LICHTENWALDName:

Irv LichtenwaldTitle:

DirectorDated:

May 6, 2005




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to S Wind-up Corporation (the Company) and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or its staff upon request. This
certification accompanies the Form 10-Q/A to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q/A), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
EXHIBIT 23

            CONSENT OF CROWE, CHIZEK AND COMPANY LLP



                 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
prospectuses constituting part of the registration statements on
Form S-3 for the CSB Bancorp, Inc. Share Owner Dividend
Reinvestment Plan and on Form S-8 for The Commercial & Savings
Bank of Millersburg Profit Sharing and 401(k) Savings Retirement
Plan and Trust of our report dated January 14, 1999 on the
consolidated balance sheets of CSB Bancorp, Inc. as of December
31, 1998 and 1997 and the related consolidated statements of
income, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 1998, which
report is included in this Form 10-K.



                              /S/ CROWE, CHIZEK AND COMPANY LLP
                              Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP

Columbus, Ohio
March 26, 1999
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 249 (Thursday, December 28, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 67054-67055]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31412]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

12 CFR Part 327


Assessments

AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FDIC published a final rule (60 FR 42680, August 16, 1995) 
that established a new assessment rate schedule of 4 to 31 basis points 
for institutions whose deposits are subject to assessment by the Bank 
Insurance Fund (BIF); widened the assessment rate spread from 8 to 27 
points; and established a procedure for adjusting the rate schedule 
semiannually as necessary to maintain the designated reserve ratio at 
1.25 percent. This document corrects three typographical errors in the 
final rule.


[[Page 67055]]

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 15, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jenetha M. Hickson, Alternate Liaison Officer, (202) 898-3807.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In preparing the final rule for publication 
in the Federal Register, typographical errors were inadvertently made. 
Accordingly, the final rule is corrected as follows:


Sec. 327.9  [Corrected]

    1. On page 42741, second column, in Sec. 327.9, in the fifth line 
of paragraph (b)(3)(i), ``paragraph (c)(2)(i) through (iv)'' is 
corrected to read ``paragraph (b)(2)(i) through (iv)''.
    2. On page 42741, third column, in Sec. 327.9:
    a. In the second line of paragraph (c)(2) introductory text 
``Sec. 327.7(a)(3)'' is corrected to read ``Sec. 327.7(a)(2)''; and
    b. In the second line of paragraph (c)(3), ``Sec. 327.7(b)(3)'' is 
corrected to read ``Sec. 327.7(b)(2)''.

    Dated: December 22, 1995.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Deputy Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-31412 Filed 12-27-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-02-M
1 The Honorable Bobby E. Shepherd, United States Magistrate Judge for the

WesternDistrict of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-2643

___________ David Hill, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Appeal from the United States Officer Hugh, Jailer, Miller County * District Court for the Jail; Officer Jody, Jailer, Miller County * Western District of Arkansas. Jail; H. L. Phillips, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: April 7, 1999 Filed: April 12, 1999

___________ Before FAGG, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. DavidHill, an Arkansas prisoner, appeals the district court’s 1 order entering judgment against him in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint following a bench trial. After careful review of the record and the parties’ briefs, we affirm for the reasons set forth in the district court’s memorandum opinion.-2-

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### STATE v. C. C. BLAIR.

(Filed 11 December, 1946.)

Embezzlement § 1—

The offense of embezzlement is exclusively statutory, and the statute does not embrace a vendor in an executory contract of purchase and sale.

Appeal by defendant from *Hamilton, Special Judge,*at March Term, 1946, of Gtuileobd.

Reversed.

Criminal prosecution under bill of indictment charging that defendant, being “the agent, consignee, clerk, employee' and servant” of O. A. Nash and P. *W.*Hendrix, did feloniously embezzle $400 entrusted to him by said Nash and Hendrix.

The money delivered to the defendant was received and accepted as earnest money.

There was a verdict of guilty. The court pronounced judgment on the verdict and defendant appealed.

*Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorneys-General Bruton, Rhodes, and Moody for the State.*

*Z. H. Howerton for defendant, appellant.*

Per Curiam.

The embezzlement statute creates an offense unknown at common law. It applies only to the classes of persons therein naméd. *71
      *S. v. Whitehurst,*212 N. C., 300, 193 S. E., 657; *S. v. Eurell,*220 N. C., 519, 17 S. E. (2d), 669. It does not embrace a vendor in an executory contract of purchase and sale. Hence the court below erred in denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss as in case of nonsuit.

The defendant did not appeal from the judgment pronounced in the ease (4430) consolidated and tried with this indictment.' Hence, said judgment is not affected by this opinion.

The judgment below (4477) is

Eeversed.
**Exhibit 23.2**

**Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

          We consent tothe incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8Nos. 333-13203, 333-61705, 333-71814, 333-92973,  333-98633, and 333-120750 and Form S-2Nos. 333-117628 and 333-124488) of Unify Corporation of our report datedJune 3, 2004, with respect to consolidated financial statements of UnifyCorporation for the year ended April 30, 2004 included in the Annual Report(Form 10-K) for the year ended April 30, 2006.

| /s/   ERNST & YOUNG LLP |   |
|----------------------------------|--------|
|                                  |   |
| Sacramento,   California         |   |
|                             |   |
| July 25, 2006          |   |
```

[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 248 (Wednesday, December 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66970-66971]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31262]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

Determination of Insufficiency of Assets to Satisfy All Claims of 
Certain Financial Institutions in Receivership

AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the authorities contained in 12 U.S.C. 
1821(c), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) was duly 
appointed receiver for the financial institution specified in 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. The FDIC has determined that the proceeds 
which can be realized from the liquidation of the assets of the below 
listed receivership estate are insufficient to wholly satisfy the 
priority claims of depositors against the receivership estates. 
Therefore, upon satisfaction of secured claims, depositor claims and 
claims which have priority over depositors under applicable law, no 
amount will remain or will be recovered sufficient to allow a dividend, 
distribution or payment to any creditor of lessor priority, including 
but not limited to, claims of general creditors. Any such claims are 
hereby determined to be worthless

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tina A. Lamoreaux, Counsel, Legal Division, FDIC, 550 17th Street, NW., 
Room H-11027, Washington, D.C. 20429. Telephone: (202) 736-3134.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Financial Institution in Receivership 
Determined 

[[Page 66971]]
to Have Insufficient Assets to Satisfy All Claims

Northside Bank, #4269 San Antonio, Texas

Dated: December 20, 1995.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Deputy Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-31262 Filed 12-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
```
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 23


                                       
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements 
on Form S-8 No. 33-86314 pertaining to the CompSavings Plan for Employees of 
CompUSA Inc., Form S-8 No. 33-99280 pertaining to the CompUSA Inc. Deferred 
Compensation Plan, Forms S-8 No. 33-45339, No. 33-72718, No. 33-99282, and 
No. 333-18033 pertaining to the Long-Term Incentive Plan, and Form S-8 No. 
333-06235 pertaining to the PCs Compleat, Inc. 1991 Stock Option Plan, of our 
report dated August 12, 1998, except for Note 14, as to which the date is 
August 31, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of 
CompUSA Inc. included in this Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 27, 
1998.



                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP



Dallas, Texas
September 21, 1998
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Meditecnic, Inc. (the "Company") on Form  10-QSB for the quarter  ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof  (the "Report"),  I, Bernard Arbalet, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Bernard Arbalet

By: Bernard Arbalet

Chief Executive  Officer

December 4, 2008
#### Dwight L. Sweet, Respondent, v. James N. Norris, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Follett, J., not sitting.