Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 4 / Friday, January 6, 1995 / Notices 2089

Footnotes

1Commercial facilities are not available.

The meal and incidental expense rate covers

charges for meals in available facilities plus

an additional allowance for incidental

expenses and will be increased by the

amount paid for Government quarters by the

traveler. 2Commercial facilities are not available.

Only Government-owned and contractor

operated quarters and mess are available at

this locality. This per diem rate is the amount

necessary to defray the cost of lodging, meals

and incidental expenses. 3On any day when U.S. Government or

contractor quarters are available and U.S.

Government or contractor messing facilities

are used, a meal and incidental expense rate

of $19.65 is prescribed to cover meals and

incidental expenses at Shemya AFB, Clear

AFS, Galena APT and King Salmon APT.

This rate will be increased by the amount

paid for U.S. Government or contractor

quarters and by $4 for each meal procured at

a commercial facility. The rates of per diem

prescribed herein apply from 0001 on the day

after arrival through 2400 on the day prior to

the day of departure. 4On any day when U.S. Government or

contractor quarters are available and U.S.

Government or contractor messing facilities

are used, a meal and incidental expense rate

of $34 is prescribed to cover meals and

incidental expenses at Amchitka Island,

Alaska. This rate will be increased by the

amount paid for U.S. Government or

contractor quarters and by $10 for each meal

procured at a commercial facility. The rates

of per diem prescribed herein apply from

0001 on the day after arrival through 2400 on

the day prior to the day of departure. 5On any day when U.S. Government or

contractor quarters are available and U.S.

Government or contractor messing facilities

are used, a meal and incidental expense rate

of $25 is prescribed instead of the rate

prescribed in the table. This rate will be

increased by the amount paid for U.S.

Government or contractor quarters. 6The meal rates listed below are prescribed

for the following locations in Alaska: Cape

Lisburne RRL, Cape Newenham RRL, Cape

Romanzof APT, Fort Yukon RRL, Indian Mtn

RRL, Sparrevohn RRL, Tatalina RRL, Tin City

RRL, Barter Island AFS, Point Barrow AFS,

Point Lay AFS and Oliktok AFS. The amount

to be added to the cost of government

quarters in determining the per diem will be

$3.50 plus the following amount:

Daily

rate

DOD Personnel ................................ $13

Non-DOD Personnel ......................... 30

7 (Eff 9–1–94) A per diem rate of $200

(lodging $148; M&IE $52) will be in effect for

Las Croabas, Puerto Rico, during the Annual

Conference of the National Association of

State Boating Law Administrators (NASBLA)

being held at the El Conquistador Resort and

County Club. This rate will be in effect from

4–12 September 1994 only for travelers

attending the conference and only for

travelers staying at the El Conquistador

Resort.

Dated: January 3, 1995.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison

Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 95–314 Filed 1–5–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5000–04–M

Public Information Collection

Requirement Submitted to the Office of

Management and Budget (OMB) for

Review

ACTION: Notice.

The Department of Defense has

submitted to OMB for clearance, the

following proposal for collections of

information under the provisions of the

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.

Chapter 35).

Title; Applicable Form; and OMB

Control Number; Air Force ROTC

College Scholarship Application; AF

Form 113; OMB Control Number

0701–0101

Type of Request: Expedited

Processing—Approval date requested:

30 days following publication in the

Federal Register

Number of Respondents: 2,000

Responses per of Respondent: 1

Annual Responses: 2,000

Average Burden per Response: 30

minutes

Annual Burden Hours: 1,000

Needs and Uses: The information

collected hereby, provides the DoD

approving authority with the data

necessary to evaluate and rule on

requests from the public for military

aerial support at community relations

Events

Affected Public: Individuals or

households; State or local

governments; Federal agencies or

employees; and non-profit institutions

Frequency: On occasion

Respondent’s Obligation: Required to

obtain or retain a benefit

OMB Desk Officer: Mr. Edward C.

Springer. Written comments and

recommendations on the proposed

information collection should be sent

to Mr. Springer at the Office of

Management and Budget, Desk Officer

for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive

Office Building, Washington, DC.

20503

DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. William

Pearce. Written requests for copies of

the information collection proposal

should be sent to Mr. Pearce, WHS/

DIOR, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway,

Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202–

4302.

Dated: January 3, 1995.

Patricia L. Toppings,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison

Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 95–315 Filed 1–5–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5000–04–M

DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES

SAFETY BOARD

[Recommendation 94–5]

Integration of DOE Safety Rules,

Orders, and Other Requirements

AGENCY: Defense Nuclear Facilities

Safety Board.

ACTION: Notice; recommendation.

SUMMARY: The Defense Nuclear

Facilities Safety Board has made a

recommendation to the Secretary of

Energy pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 2286a

concerning Integration of DOE Safety

Rules, Orders, and Other Requirements.

The Board requests public comments on

this recommendation.

DATES: Comments, data, views, or

arguments concerning this

recommendation are due on or before

February 6, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Send comments, data,

views, or arguments concerning this

recommendation to: Defense Nuclear

Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana

Avenue, NW., Suite 700, Washington,

DC 20004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kenneth M. Pusateri or Carole C.

Morgan, at the address above or

telephone (202) 208–6400.

Dated: January 2, 1995.

John T. Conway,

Chairman.

[Recommendation 94–5]

The Board has been following with

considerable interest the structure of

DOE’s nuclear health and safety

requirements as the transition is being

made from the use of Orders to

rulemaking. The Board recognizes that

the change has been prompted by

provisions of the Price/Anderson Act

Amendments of 1988, the need for

uniform, enforceable requirements, and

by a desire of the Department to provide

greater opportunities for public input

into the process for establishment of

requirements. Thus the Board

understands the reasons for

development and promulgation of

nuclear safety requirements through

rulemaking. However, the Board has

expressed reservations in the past and

remains concerned today lest the

process of conversion of Orders to rules

is used as occasion to: