[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 9, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 6763-6765]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02421]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0756; FRL-9941-11-Region 9]


Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Yolo-Solano Air 
Quality Management District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct 
final action to approve revisions to the Yolo-Solano Air Quality 
Management District (YSAQMD) portion of the California State 
Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern emissions of 
volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and oxides of nitrogen 
(NO<INF>X</INF>) from gasoline dispensing facilities and stationary gas 
turbines. We are approving local rules that regulate these emission 
sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act).

DATES: This rule is effective on April 11, 2016 without further notice, 
unless the EPA receives adverse comments by March 10, 2016. If we 
receive such comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the 
Federal Register to notify the public that this direct final rule will 
not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R09-
OAR-2015-0756 at http://www.regulations.gov, or via email to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#beedcadbddd5dbd290ffd0daccdbc9fedbcedf90d9d1c8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="580b2c3d3b333d347619363c2a3d2f183d2839763f372e">[email protected]</span></a>. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, 
follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, 
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either 
manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its 
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you 
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other 
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia 
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written 
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and 
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will 
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of 
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing 
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person 
identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full 
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia 
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please 
visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Gong, EPA Region IX, (415) 972 
3073, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#20674f4e470e6b4556494e604550410e474f56"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e9ae86878ec7a28c9f8087a98c9988c78e869f">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us,'' 
and ``our'' refer to the EPA.

Table of Contents

I. The State's Submittal
    A. What rules did the State submit?
    B. Are there other versions of these rules?
    C. What is the purpose of the rule revisions?
II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action
    A. How is the EPA evaluating the rules?
    B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?
    C. EPA Recommendations to Further Improve the Rules
    D. Public Comment and Final Action
III. Incorporation by Reference
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. The State's Submittal

A. What rules did the State submit?

    Table 1 lists the rules addressed by this action with the dates 
that they were adopted by the local air agency and submitted by the 
California Air Resources Board (CARB).

                                            Table 1--Submitted Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Local agency              Rule No.                Rule title                Revised        Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YSAQMD.........................            2.22  Gasoline Dispensing Facilities.        01/14/14        06/26/15
YSAQMD.........................            2.34  Stationary Gas Turbines........        11/12/14        06/26/15
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On August 13, 2015, the EPA determined that the submittal for 
YSAQMD Rules 2.22 and 2.34 met the completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 
51, appendix V, which must be met before formal EPA review.

B. Are there other versions of these rules?

    We approved an earlier version of Rule 2.22 into the SIP on January 
23, 2003 (68 FR 3190), and an earlier version of Rule 2.34 into the SIP 
on September 3, 1998 (63 FR 46892).

C. What is the purpose of the rule revisions?

    VOCs help produce ground-level ozone, smog and PM, which harm human 
health and the environment. Section 110(a) of the CAA requires States 
to submit regulations that control VOC emissions. The revisions to Rule 
2.22 exempt certain categories of facilities that have other vapor 
recovery control measures in place, require aboveground storage tanks 
to install additional approved vapor recovery systems, require Phase II 
enhanced vapor recovery systems at all dispensing facilities, and 
require operators to conduct appropriate inspection and maintenance 
procedures.
    NO<INF>X</INF> helps produce ground-level ozone, smog and PM, which 
harm human health and the environment. Section 110(a) of the CAA 
requires States to submit regulations that control NO<INF>X</INF> 
emissions. The revisions to Rule 2.34 define new operation requirements 
during start-up and shut-down of units and during short-term 
exceedances under specific circumstances, and require facilities to 
install continuous emissions monitoring systems.
    The EPA's technical support documents (TSDs) have more information 
about these rules.

II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action

A. How is the EPA evaluating the rules?

    SIP rules must be enforceable (see CAA section 110(a)(2)), must not 
interfere with applicable requirements concerning attainment and 
reasonable further progress or other CAA requirements (see CAA section 
110(l)), and must not modify certain SIP control requirements in 
nonattainment areas without ensuring equivalent or greater emissions 
reductions (see CAA section 193).
    Generally, SIP rules must require Reasonably Available Control 
Technology (RACT) for each category of sources covered by a Control 
Techniques Guidelines (CTG) document

[[Page 6764]]

as well as each major source of VOCs and NO<INF>X</INF> in ozone 
nonattainment areas classified as moderate or above (see CAA sections 
182(b)(2)). YSAQMD regulates an ozone nonattainment area classified as 
Severe for the 2008 8-hour National Ambient Air Quality Standard (40 
CFR 81.305). Therefore, Rules 2.22 and 2.34 must implement RACT.
    Guidance and policy documents that we use to evaluate 
enforceability, revision/relaxation and rule stringency requirements 
for the applicable criteria pollutants include the following:

    1. ``State Implementation Plans; General Preamble for the 
Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,'' 
(57 FR 13498, April 16, 1992 and 57 FR 18070, April 28, 1992).
    2. ``Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, 
and Deviations'' (``the Bluebook,'' U.S. EPA, May 25, 1988; revised 
January 11, 1990).
    3. ``Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule 
Deficiencies'' (``the Little Bluebook'', EPA Region 9, August 21, 
2001).
    4. ``State Implementation Plans; Nitrogen Oxides Supplement to 
the General Preamble; Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 
Implementation of Title I; Proposed Rule'' (``the NO<INF>X</INF> 
Supplement,'' 57 FR 55620, November 25, 1992).
    5. ``Design Criteria for Stage 1 Vapor Control Systems,'' (EPA-
450/R-75-102).
    6. ``Technical Guidance--Stage II Vapor Recovery Systems for 
Control of Refueling Emissions at Gasoline Dispensing Facilities,'' 
(EPA-450/3-91-022).
    7. ``Restatement to Update of EPA's SSM Policy Applicable to 
SIPs,'' (80 FR 33839, June 12, 2015).
    8. ``Alternative Control Techniques Document--NO<INF>X</INF> 
Emissions from Stationary Gas Turbines,'' (EPA-453/R-93-007).

B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?

    We believe these rules are consistent with the relevant policy and 
guidance regarding enforceability, RACT, Reasonably Available Control 
Measures, and SIP relaxations. The TSDs have more information on our 
evaluation.

C. EPA Recommendations to Further Improve the Rule(s)

    The TSDs describe additional rule revisions that we recommend for 
the next time the local agency modifies the rules but are not currently 
the basis for rule disapproval.

D. Public Comment and Final Action

    As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully 
approving the submitted rules because we believe they fulfill all 
relevant requirements. We do not think anyone will object to this 
approval, so we are finalizing it without proposing it in advance. 
However, in the Proposed Rules section of this Federal Register, we are 
simultaneously proposing approval of the same submitted rules. If we 
receive adverse comments by March 10, 2016, we will publish a timely 
withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify the public that the direct 
final approval will not take effect and we will address the comments in 
a subsequent final action based on the proposal. If we do not receive 
timely adverse comments, the direct final approval will be effective 
without further notice on April 11, 2016. This will incorporate these 
rules into the federally enforceable SIP. These rules will supersede 
the existing SIP-approved rules.
    Please note that if the EPA receives adverse comment on an 
amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may 
be severed from the remainder of the rule, the EPA may adopt as final 
those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse 
comment.

III. Incorporation by Reference

    In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes 
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the 
YSAQMD rules described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth 
below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents 
available electronically through www.regulations.gov and in hard copy 
at the appropriate EPA office (see the ADDRESSES section of this 
preamble for more information).

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a 
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and 
applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state 
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. 
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal 
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those 
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
    <bullet> Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review 
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
    <bullet> does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
    <bullet> is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
    <bullet> does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
    <bullet> does not have Federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
    <bullet> is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
    <bullet> is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
    <bullet> is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the Clean Air Act; and
    <bullet> does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority 
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or 
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible 
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian 
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe 
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not 
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal 
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 
2000).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and 
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot 
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2).

[[Page 6765]]

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court 
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by April 11, 2016. Filing a 
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule 
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of 
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for 
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness 
of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final 
rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel 
notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the Proposed 
Rules section of this Federal Register, rather than file an immediate 
petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that the EPA 
can withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the 
proposed rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in 
proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen 
dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile 
organic compounds.

    Dated: December 24, 2015.
Alexis Strauss,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.

    Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is 
amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart F--California

0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(199)(i)(E)(3), 
(c)(303)(i)(B)(3), and (c)(463)(i)(B)(2) and (3) to read as follows:


Sec.  52.220  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (199) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (E) * * *
    (3) Previously approved on September 3, 1998, in paragraph 
(c)(199)(i)(E)(1) of this section and now deleted with replacement in 
paragraph (c)(463)(i)(B)(3) of this section, Rule 2.34, ``Stationary 
Gas Turbines,'' adopted on July 13, 1994.
* * * * *
    (303) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (B) * * *
    (3) Previously approved on January 23, 2003, in paragraph 
(c)(303)(i)(B)(1) of this section and now deleted with replacement in 
paragraph (c)(463)(i)(B)(2) of this section, Rule 2.22, ``Gasoline 
Dispensing Facilities,'' revised on June 12, 2002.
* * * * *
    (463) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (B) * * *
    (2) Rule 2.22, ``Gasoline Dispensing Facilities,'' revised on 
January 14, 2015.
    (3) Rule 2.34, ``Stationary Gas Turbines,'' revised on November 12, 
2014.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2016-02421 Filed 2-8-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>