alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Cite as State ex rel. Manuel v. Stenson, 126 Ohio St.3d 52, 2010-Ohio-2673.]

T HE S TATE EX REL . M ANUEL , A PPELLANT , v. S TENSON , A PPELLEE . [Cite as State ex rel. Manuel v. Stenson, 126 Ohio St.3d 52, 2010-Ohio-2673.] Appellate procedure — Untimely appeal dismissed — S.Ct.Prac.R. 2.2(A)(1). (No. 2010-0248 — Submitted June 9, 2010 — Decided June 16, 2010.)
A PPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County, No. 23583.

__________________ Per Curiam. {¶ 1} We dismiss the appeal of appellant, Michael Manuel, because although he challenges the court of appeals’ November 10, 2009 judgment denying his petition for a writ of mandamus, he failed to file a timely appeal from that judgment. S.Ct.Prac.R. 2.2(A)(1). His amended motion for rehearing,
whether construed as a motion for recons ideration or a Civ.R. 60(B) motion for relief from judgment, did not extend his time to appeal the judgment. State ex rel.
Martin v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. , 124 Ohio St.3d 63, 2009-Ohio-6164, 918 N.E.2d 1005, ¶ 1. Manuel cannot use Civ.R. 60(B) as a substitute for a timely appeal. Id. Appeal dismissed.
B ROWN , C.J., and P FEIFER , L UNDBERG S TRATTON , O’C ONNOR , O’D ONNELL , L ANZINGER , and C UPP , JJ., concur.

__________________ Michael Manuel, pro se.

______________________
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 243 (Tuesday, December 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 65289]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30802]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[C-333-002]


Cotton Yarn From Peru; Termination of Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of termination of countervailing duty administrative 
review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On June 25, 1993, (58 FR 34414) the Department of Commerce 
(the Department) initiated an administrative review of the 
countervailing duty order on cotton yarn from Peru for the period 
January 1, 1992 through December 31, 1992. The Department has now 
decided to terminate this review.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 19, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gayle Longest or Kelly Parkhill, 
Office of Countervailing Compliance, Import Administration, 
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 
Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230; 
telephone: (202) 482-2786.

Background

    On February 25, 1993, the Department received a request for an 
administrative review of this countervailing duty order from the 
American Yarn Spinners Association (AYSA) for the period January 1, 
1992 to December 31, 1992. No other interested party requested an 
administrative review. On June 25, 1993 the Department published, in 
the Federal Register (58 FR 34414), a notice of ``Initiation of 
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review.'' On December 1, 1995, AYSA 
withdrew its request for review.
    Section 355.22(a)(3) of the Department's regulations stipulates 
that the Secretary may permit a party that requests a review to 
withdraw the request not later than 90 days after the date of 
publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. This 
regulation also provides that the Secretary may extend the time limit 
for withdrawal of a request if it is reasonable to do so.
    Because no significant work has been completed on this review, the 
aforementioned request for withdrawal does not unduly burden the 
Department. Therefore, under the circumstances presented in this 
review, we are waiving the 90-day requirement in section 355.22(a)(3). 
Accordingly, we are terminating this review.
    This notice is published in accordance with section 355.22(a)(3) of 
the Department's regulations.

    Dated: December 11, 1995.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Compliance.
[FR Doc. 95-30802 Filed 12-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5333 Filed: 01/10/20 Entered: 01/10/20 08:54:36 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5333 Filed: 01/10/20 Entered: 01/10/20 08:54:36 Page 2 of

2
2018 SOA Annual Meeting Session 

Stochastic Modelling for Social Sec

Actuarial Valuations

Office of the Chief Actuary

U.S. Social Security Administration

October 15, 2018
• Exploring uncertainty for 75­year projec

– In addition to deterministic alternatives– In addition to sensitivity analysis

• Probabilistic illustration based on past v• 5,000 Monte Carlo simulations• Reflects basic projection methods 

– But with somewhat more limited paramet
• Demographic assumptions:

– Total fertility rate– Mortality rates by sex/age­group– Total legal permanent resident (LPR) new 

immigrants

– Total LPR and citizen emigrants– Rate of transfers of status from other­than

stock

– Total other­than­LPR immigration
• Economic assumptions:

– Unemployment rate– % change in CPI– Real interest rate– % change in real wage

• Disability assumptions:

– Total male and female disability incidence – Total male and female disability recovery r
• Based on historical data, we estimate a

equation (generally AR or ARMA, depenon the fit) for each assumption. 

• Years of data used vary by assumption, 

depending on which years of data are available and appropriate.
The total fertility rate (TFR) equation is an ARM

u

t + 1.84

Xt­1 ­ 1.29Xt­2 + 0.83

Xt­3 ­ 0.41

Xt­4 + 1.00

e

t ­ 0

where

et is the error term at time t, 

u

t is the a

at time t, and 

Xt is the deviation from the me

time t.
Stochastic Results of Total Fertility Rate

Note: The grey mark is the low­cost ultimate assumption and the green mark is the high­cost ultim
ut + 1.84Xt­1 ­ 1.29Xt­2 + 0.83Xt­3 ­ 0.41Xt­4 + 1.

0.47et­1

• Under PU, the parameters 1.84, ­1.29, 0

­0.41, and 0.47 would change in each simulation.

• ut would also change for each simulation
1. Demographic bounds reached more often

2. Negative other­than­LPR population can o3. Disability rates can go under 0% and over 4. Economic values can have extremely high 

variance.
Results of Total Fertility Rate



• Usefulness of stochastic simulations

– For Social Security

• Is risk aversion same in both directions?

– For private insurance

• Is risk aversion one­sided?

• How is stochastic used in private insura

pensions/other areas?

– Univariate or multiple variables?– Parameter uncertainty?
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00433-CV

In re Cedric Bernard Walton

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM MILAM COUNTY

M E M O R AN D U M O P I N I O N

Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________

Jeff Rose, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin

Filed: July 18, 2014
### Proposed Provision: A6. Starting December 2025, compute the COLA using the Consumer Price Index for the Elderly (CPI-E). We estimate this new computation will increase the annual COLA by about 0.2 percentage point, on average.

back
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3503 

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to expand access to capital 

for rural-area small businesses, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 13 (legislative day, JANUARY 10), 2022 

Mr. KENNEDY (for himself, Ms. SMITH, and Mr. PETERS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to expand 

access to capital for rural-area small businesses, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Expanding Access to 

5 Capital for Rural Job Creators Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ACCESS TO CAPITAL FOR RURAL-AREA SMALL BUSI7 NESSES. 

8 Section 4(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

9 (15 U.S.C. 78d(j)) is amended— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3503 IS

1 (1) in paragraph (4)(C), by inserting ‘‘rural2 area small businesses,’’ after ‘‘women-owned small 

3 businesses,’’; and 

4 (2) in paragraph (6)(B)(iii), by inserting 

5 ‘‘rural-area small businesses,’’ after ‘‘women-owned 

6 small businesses,’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the
undersigned officers of Pacific Copper Corp. (the "Company"), does hereby
certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:





The annual Report on Form 10-KSB for
the year ended October 31, 2008 (the “Form 10-KSB”) of the Company fully
complies with the requirement of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.





Dated:
January 26, 2009





/s/ Andrew BrodkeyAndrew
      Brodkey, CEO(Chief
      Executive Officer of Pacific Copper
Corp.)





Dated:
January 26, 2009





/s/ Rakesh MalhotraRakesh
      Malhotra, Chief Financial Officer(Chief
      Financial Officer of Pacific Copper
Corp.)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Pacific Copper Corp. and will be retained by Pacific Copper Corp. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.25

                              [MEDIMMUNE LOGO HERE]

                                    AMENDMENT

         This Amendment, effective on the last date of signature below, modifies
and amends the Collaboration and License Agreement dated effective April 19,
2001 (the "Agreement"), by and between Genaera Corporation ("GENAERA") and
MedImmune, Inc. ("MEDIMMUNE").

                                   WITNESSETH

         WHEREAS, MEDIMMUNE and GENAERA desire to amend the Agreement in order
to modify the research plan proposed thereunder;

         NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and of the mutual
covenants and agreements herein set forth, the parties hereto agree as follows:

         1.        Appendix D of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting it
                   in its entirety and replacing it with the Revised Joint R&D
                   Program ("Exhibit I") attached hereto and incorporated by
                   reference.

         2.        The Revised Joint R&D Program will be re-assessed in April
                   2002 and revised accordingly. Priority will given to the
                   Primary Goals, with emphasis on Primary Goal I (in vivo
                   bioassays). Secondary Goals will be addressed if Primary
                   Goals are complete and resources allow.

         This Amendment and the Agreement set forth the entire agreement and
understanding between the parties as to the subject matter thereof and
supersedes all prior agreements and understandings in this respect. There shall
be no amendments or modifications to this Amendment or the Agreement, except by
a written document which is signed by both parties.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have each caused this Amendment to be
signed and delivered by its duly authorized officer or representative as
indicated below.


MEDIMMUNE                                            GENAERA

By:  /s/ Peter Kiener, Ph.D.                         By: /s/ Roy C. Levitt, M.D.
    --------------------------------                     -----------------------
Name:    Peter Kiener, Ph.D.                         Name:
Title:   Vice President, Research                    Title:

Date:    1/14/02                                     Date:    1/08/02
     -------------                                        -------------

                                       1
exv10w1






EXHIBIT 10.1




GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY

FORM OF

STOCK OPTION CANCELLATION AGREEMENT




     This STOCK OPTION CANCELLATION AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is by and between Gaylord
Entertainment Company, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and _________(the “Employee”).



     WHEREAS, the Employee believes that it is in the best interest of the Company and its
stockholders to voluntarily cancel existing Company stock options held by Employee set forth on
Exhibit A (the “Cancelled Options”) that have relatively low incentive or retention value
at this time so that additional shares become available for grant under the Company’s 2006 Omnibus
Incentive Plan (the “2006 Plan”) which the Company may use for future equity grants to Company
personnel in order to recruit, retain and motivate such personnel; and



     WHEREAS, the Company is relying upon the Employee’s surrender and cancellation of the
Cancelled Options in making determinations about the future grant of equity awards pursuant to the
2006 Plan and otherwise in regard to the administration of the 2006 Plan;



     NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows:



     Section 1. Cancellation of Options. The Employee hereby surrenders the Cancelled
Options for cancellation, and the Company hereby accepts such surrender and cancellation. By
execution of this Agreement, the parties have taken all steps necessary to cancel the Cancelled
Options.



     Section 2. No Expectation or Obligation. The Company and Employee acknowledge and
agree that the surrender and cancellation of the Cancelled Options described herein shall be
without any expectation of the Employee to receive, and without imposing any obligation on the
Company to pay or grant, any cash, equity awards or other consideration presently or in the future
in regard to the cancellation of the Cancelled Options.



     Section 3. Miscellaneous. This Agreement contains all of the understandings between
the Company and Employee concerning the cancellation of the options. The Company and Employee have
made no promises, agreements, conditions, or understandings relating to this subject matter, either
orally or in writing, that are not included in this Agreement. This Agreement may be executed in
counterparts, each of which when signed by the Company and the Employee will be deemed an original
and all of which together will be deemed the same agreement. This Agreement shall be governed and
construed exclusively in accordance with the law of the State of Delaware applicable to agreements
to be performed in the State of Delaware to the extent it may apply.



 









 





[signature page of Stock Option Cancellation Agreement]




              
The Company and the Employee have caused this Agreement to be signed and delivered as of the
6th day of August, 2009.



GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY



	 	 	 	 
	 
	By:	 
	Name of Employee
	 	Title:	 






2









 






Exhibit A




Description of Cancelled Options




[Table]



TOTAL OPTIONS CANCELLED —                                 





3
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

NICHOLAS CROCKETT, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 725 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 29th day of December, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED. 

Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the decision of this matter.
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*Isaac M. Haswell v. The Board of Supervisors of Albany County.

Writ of *certiorari*quashed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements.

Opinion by

Landon, J,
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members         
    -  AEE Multimedia 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# PHOTOS ANDVIDEOS

Search

Search

                                - All Images 
                                - Other 
                                - Space Shuttle 

                                - Upload Date
                                - Photo Date
                                - Title

----

Download Image: Full Size (1.91 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
# 1AL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21-0181 IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: ALIA DAY FLOREN,

Petitioner and Appellee, v. JAVIER BAUTISTA-SCHEUBER,

Respondent and Appellant. 

# FILED DEC 1 2 2021 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant's motion for extension of tirne, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDEREDthat Appellant has until January 26,2022, withinwhich to file his reply brief. No further extensions will be granted. DATED thisZ.--k day ofDecember, 2021. For the Court,

ChiefJustice 12/22/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0181
**Exhibit 99.4**

 

 

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report (the “Report”)on the Form 10-K of Siga Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended July 31, 2013, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Bob Hogarth, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary Treasurer and Director, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best ofmy knowledge and belief:

 

1.    The Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.     The information containedin this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

 

Date: November 22, 2013
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5752 

To require the Secretary of State to offer rewards for information on the 

kidnapping and murder of James Foley, Peter Kassig, Steven Sotloff, 

or the kidnapping and murder of any other citizen of the United States 

by a foreign terrorist organization. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 20, 2014 

Mr. GOSAR (for himself, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. COOK, 

Mr. STOCKMAN, Mr. SHERMAN, Mr. SALMON, Mr. SCHWEIKERT, Mr. 

BRIDENSTINE, Mr. STEWART, Mr. DESANTIS, Mr. YOHO, Mr. DUNCAN

of South Carolina, Mr. MULVANEY, and Mr. HURT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of State to offer rewards for information on the kidnapping and murder of James Foley, 

Peter Kassig, Steven Sotloff, or the kidnapping and murder of any other citizen of the United States by a foreign 

terrorist organization. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REWARDS AUTHORIZED. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—In accordance with the Rewards 

5 for Justice program authorized under section 36(b) of the 

6 State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5752 IH

1 U.S.C. 2708(b)), the Secretary of State shall offer a re2 ward to any individual who furnishes information leading 

3 to the arrest or conviction in any country of any individual 

4 for committing, conspiring or attempting to commit, or 

5 aiding or abetting in the commission of the kidnapping 

6 and murder of James Foley, Peter Kassig, Steven Sotloff, 

7 or the kidnapping and murder of any other citizen of the 

8 United States by a foreign terrorist organization. 

9 (b) LIMITATION.—The total amount of rewards of10 fered under subsection (a) in connection with the kidnap11 ping and murder of any one of the individuals named in 

12 such subsection or any other citizen of the United States 

13 described in such subsection may not exceed $5,000,000. 

14 (c) FOREIGN TERRORIST ORGANIZATION.—The term 

15 ‘‘foreign terrorist organization’’ means an organization 

16 designated by the Secretary of State as a foreign terrorist 

17 organization in accordance with section 219 of the Immi18 gration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189). 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Matter of Application of James Sheridan to be substituted Attorney in Place of Reilly.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION





The
undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:





(1) The
accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:  February
      13, 2009
            By
      /s/ Mark N.
  SchwartzMark
      N. SchwartzChief
      Executive Officer











Date:  February
      13, 2009
            By
      /s/ Mark P.
O’NeillMark
      P. O’NeillManager
      of Finance and Accounting
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

DONNA KILGALLON,

Petitioner

v.

THE VILLAGE AT PALMERTON

ASSISTED LIVING AND LAUNDRY

OWNERS MUTUAL LIABILITY

INSURANCE ASSOCIATION OF PENNSYLVANIA (WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD),

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 469 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 17th day of May, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.