alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Proposed Provision: G7. Invest 25 percent of the OASI and DI Trust Fund reserves in equities (phased in 2026-2035), assuming an ultimate 2.3 percent annual real rate of return on equities. Thus, the ultimate rate of return on equities is the same as that assumed for Trust Fund bonds.

back
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership (the
"Partnership") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Harold Brown, the Treasurer and a
Director of the Partnership's General Partner of the Partnership, and Ronald Brown, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted each hereby certifies, pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



/s/ HAROLD BROWN Harold Brown
Principal Financial Officer
(Treasurer and Director of
the Partnership's General Partner,
NewReal, Inc.)


November 10,
2008

This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to SS906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of SS18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by SS 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
### Proposed Provision: B3.16. For retired worker and disabled worker beneficiaries becoming initially eligible in January 2030 or later, phase in a new benefit formula (from 2030 to 2039). Replace the existing two primary insurance amount (PIA) bend points with three new bend points as follows:  (1) 25% AWI/12 from 2 years prior to initial eligibility; (2) 100% AWI/12 from 2 years prior to initial eligibility; and (3) 125% AWI/12 from 2 years prior to initial eligibility.  The new PIA factors are 95%, 27.5%, 5% and 2%. During the phase in, those becoming newly eligible for benefits will receive an increasing portion of their benefits based on the new formula, reaching 100% of the new formula in 2039.

back
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                            ALLEGIANCE TELECOM, INC.

                         COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE LOSS

                      Three Months Ended September 30, 1999

                      (In thousands, except share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                           NUMBER OF            PERCENT             EQUIVALENT
                                                                            SHARES            OUTSTANDING             SHARES

                                                                          ----------          -----------          ------------
<S>                                                                     <C>                 <C>                    <C>
   1997 Common Stock Offering                                                    426            100.00%                     426
   1998 Common Stock Offering                                             10,000,000            100.00%              10,000,000
   Preferred Stock Converted to Common Stock                              40,341,128            100.00%              40,341,128
   Treasury Shares                                                           (25,312)           100.00%                 (25,312)
   1999 Employee Stock Discount Purchase Plan Shares Issued                   83,057             98.76%                  82,025
   1999 Common Stock Offering                                             14,027,400            100.00%              14,027,400
   Warrants Exercised                                                        360,538             90.60%                 326,638
   Stock Options Exercised - 1997 Plan                                        72,905             63.23%                  46,101
   Stock Options Exercised - 1998 Plan                                         4,693             50.44%                   2,367

   WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING                                                                               64,800,773

   NET LOSS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK                                                                             $(56,392,981)

   NET LOSS PER SHARE, BASIC AND DILUTED                                                                           $      (0.87)
                                                                                                                   ============
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Apple REIT Eight, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company as of December 31, 2008, and for the period then ended.

|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|/s/ GLADEM. KNIGHT                    
|Glade M. KnightChief Executive Officer
|                                      
|                                      
|March 3, 2009                         
|                                      
|/s/ BRYANPEERY                        
|Bryan PeeryChief Financial Officer    
|                                      
|                                      
|March 3, 2009                         



---
T. O., A Child

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 1 6

- 15 7 1

_________ ____________________/

Opinion filed November 9, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval C ounty

. Henry E . Davis

, J udge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and S teven Seliger, Assistant Publi c Defender,

Tallahassee

, for Appellant

.

Pamela Jo Bond i, Attorney General, and Sharon S. Traxler, Assistant Attorney

General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, KELSEY, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
#### REMUS WIMBS v. TALLASSEE POWER COMPANY.

(Filed 18 December, 1929.)

Appeal by defendant from *McBlroy, j.,*at June Term, 1929, of Graham.

Civil action to recover damages for the alleged negligent failure of defendant, in the exercise of ordinary care, to furnish plaintiff, an employee, a sufficient number of competent helpers when he was ordered by the defendant to carry a heavy iron culvert, or drain pipe, 12 feet long, 10 inches in diameter, weighing about 600 pounds, up a steep mountain side and without providing proper implements for the work.

Upon denial of liability, the usual issues of negligence, contributory negligence, assumption of risk and damages were submitted to the jury and answered in favor of the plaintiff.

From the judgment rendered thereon, the defendant appeals, assigning errors.

*T\ M. J enkins for plaintiff.*

*S. W. Black and B. L. Phillips for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

A careful perusal of the record leaves us with the impression that the case has been tried substantially in accord with the principles of law applicable, and that no sufficient reason has been made manifest for disturbing the verdict and judgment, which accordingly, will be upheld.

No error.
II 

Calendar No. 430 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3273 

[Report No. 117–125] 

To take certain land in the State of California into trust for the benefit 

of the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 29, 2021 

Mr. PADILLA (for himself and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

JUNE 23, 2022 

Reported by Mr. SCHATZ, without amendment 

A BILL 

To take certain land in the State of California into trust 

for the benefit of the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla 

Indians, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Agua Caliente Land 

5 Exchange Fee to Trust Confirmation Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3273 RS

1 SEC. 2. LAND TO BE TAKEN INTO TRUST FOR THE BENEFIT 

2 OF THE AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA 

3 INDIANS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The approximately 2,560 acres of 

5 land owned by the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians 

6 generally depicted as ‘‘Lands to be Taken into Trust’’ on 

7 the map entitled ‘‘Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians 

8 Land to be Taken into Trust’’ and dated November 17, 

9 2021, is hereby taken into trust by the United States for 

10 the benefit of the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians. 

11 (b) ADMINISTRATION.—Land taken into trust by 

12 subsection (a) shall be— 

13 (1) part of the reservation of the Agua Caliente 

14 Band of Cahuilla Indians; and 

15 (2) administered in accordance with the laws 

16 and regulations generally applicable to property held 

17 in trust by the United States for the benefit of an 

18 Indian Tribe. 

19 (c) GAMING PROHIBITED.—Land taken into trust by 

20 subsection (a) shall not be eligible for gaming under the 

21 Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.). 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 430 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3273 

[Report No. 117–125] 

A BILL 

To take certain land in the State of California into 

of Cahuilla Indians, and for other purposes. trust for the benefit of the Agua Caliente Band 

JUNE 23, 2022 

Reported without amendment 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### A. T. JULIAN v. CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM et al.

(Filed 16 November, 1927.)

Appeal and Error — Divided Court — Law of the Case.'

Where one of the justices of the Supreme Court takes no part in the decision of the case, and the other four are equally divided in their opinion, the judgment of the lower court is the law of the case, but not to be regarded as a precedent.

Appeal by defendants from *Harding, J.,*at Majf Term, 1927, of FORSYTE.

*W. B. Dalton for plaintiff.*

*Fred M. Parrish for defendants.*

Per Curiam.

One member of tbe Court not sitting and tbe others being equally divided in opinion, tbe judgment will not be disturbed, but tbe decision will not become a precedent.

No error.
#### CHARLES J. AHRENS v. LUTHER C. ROBEY

(Filed 26 March, 1958)

Appeal and Error § 46—

The discretionary ruling of the trial judge in setting aside the verdict as being contrary to the weight of the evidence is not reviewable on appeal in the absence of abuse of discretion.

Appeal by plaintiff from Craven, Special Judge, at 16 September, 1957, Regular “B” Civil Term of Meciclenbuhg.

Civil action for libel.

Issues were submitted to and answered by the jury as follows:

“1. Did the defendant write concerning the plaintiff the words in substance, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: YES.

“2. If so, were they true? Answer: NO.

“3. What damages, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendant? Answer: $2,000.00.”

The defendant, through counsel, moved the trial judge to set aside the verdict as being contrary to the weight of the evidence. The judge, “in his discretion,” allowed the motion and entered judgment setting the verdict aside and directing that the case be tried *de novo.*The plaintiff appeals.

*Ralph C. Clontz, Jr., for plaintiff, appellant.*

*Morgan, Byerly & Post and Dotson G. Palmer for defendant, ap-pellee.*

PeR Curiam.

The discretionary ruling of the trial judge in setting aside the verdict as being contrary to the weight of the evidence is not reviewable on appeal in the absence of abuse of discretion. Here there is no evidence of such abuse. Therfore the appeal will be dismissed. *Goodman v. Goodman,*201 N.C. 808, 161 S.E. 686; *In re Will of Hargrove,*207 N.C. 280, 176 S.E. 752; *Hawley v. Powell,*222 N.C. 713, 24 S.E. 2d 523; *Ward v. Cruse,*234 N.C. 388, 67 S.E. 2d 257; *Williams v. Stumpf,*243 N.C. 434, 90 S.E. 2d 688.

Appeal Dismissed.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5493 

To amend the Coast Guard Authorization Act of 1989 to expand the Coast 

Guard Junior Reserve Officers Training Program Pilot Program to include a Coast Guard unit at Pinellas Park High School in Pinellas 

Park, Florida, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 16, 2014 

Mr. JOLLY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the Coast Guard Authorization Act of 1989 to 

expand the Coast Guard Junior Reserve Officers Training Program Pilot Program to include a Coast Guard 

unit at Pinellas Park High School in Pinellas Park, 

Florida, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF COAST GUARD JUNIOR RE4 SERVE OFFICERS TRAINING PROGRAM PILOT 

5 PROGRAM. 

6 (a) INCLUSION OF ADDITIONAL SCHOOL.—Sub7 section (a) of section 204 of the Coast Guard AuthorizaVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:53 Sep 23, 2014 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5493.IH H5493

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5493 IH

1 tion Act of 1989 (Public Law 101–225; 14 U.S.C. 92 

2 note) is amended— 

3 (1) by striking ‘‘in cooperation’’ and inserting 

4 the following: 

5 ‘‘(1) in cooperation’’; 

6 (2) by striking the period at the end and insert7 ing ‘‘; and’’; and 

8 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

9 paragraph: 

10 ‘‘(2) in cooperation with the Pinellas County 

11 School District of Pinellas County, Florida, as part 

12 of Pinellas Park High School (hereinafter in this 

13 section referred to as the ‘High School’).’’. 

14 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Such section is 

15 further amended— 

16 (1) by inserting ‘‘and the High School’’ after 

17 ‘‘Academy’’ in subsections (b)(2), (c), and (d) (the 

18 first and third places ‘‘Academy’’ appears); and 

19 (2) by inserting ‘‘or the High School, as the 

20 case may be’’ after ‘‘Academy’’ in subsection (d) 

21 (the second place ‘‘Academy’’ appears). 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### STATE v. ANDREW PARSONS.

(Filed 28 March, 1945.)

Appeal by defendant from *Armstrong, J.,*at August Term, 1944, of Caldwell.

Criminal prosecution upon indictment charging defendant witb carnal knowledge of a virtuous female child, over twelve and under sixteen years of age. G. S., 14-26.

*766Verdict: Guilty of carnal knowledge as charged in the bill of indictment.

Judgment: Confinement in Central Prison at Raleigh for not less than three nor more than five years.

Defendant appeals to Supreme Court and assigns error.

*Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorneys-General Rhodes and Moody for the State.*

*W. II. Strickland for defendant, appellant.*

Per Curiam.

The several assignments of error presented by defendant on this appeal have been carefully considered and are found to be without merit. The trial appears to have been conducted in full accordance with settled rules of evidence and well established principles of law. And the evidence taken in the light most favorable to the State is sufficient to take the case to the jury, and to support the verdict. Hence, in the judgment below we find

No error.
Exhibit 23.2





INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT




To the Board of Directors of
Tremont Advisers, Inc.


We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No.  33-78346)  pertaining to the Tremont Advisers,  Inc.
Savings Plan of our report dated  February 18, 2000 on the financial  statements
of American  Masters  Broad Market Fund, L.P. as of December 31, 1999 and
for the year then ended which  report is  included in the Annual  Report on Form
10-KSB of Tremont Advisers, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2000.




GOLDSTEIN GOLUB KESSLER LLP
New York, New York

March 7, 2001










                                       90
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 24 (Friday, February 5, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 6264]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02204]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than February 29, 2016.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. MB Financial, Inc., Chicago, Illinois; to merge with American 
Chartered Bancorp, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire American 
Chartered Bank, both of Schaumburg, Illinois.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Yvonne Sparks, Community 
Development Officer) P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:
    1. First Security Bancorp, Searcy, Arkansas, to acquire an 
additional one percent for a total of 10.91% of the voting shares of 
CrossFirst Holdings, LLC, Leawood, Kansas, and thereby increase its 
interest in CrossFirst Bank, Leawood, Kansas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 1, 
2016.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2016-02204 Filed 2-4-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          32,871
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,467
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (9,367)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,038
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                55,709
<PP&E>                                         171,352
<DEPRECIATION>                                (75,271)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 178,746
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,188
<BONDS>                                         36,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           295
<OTHER-SE>                                      96,510
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   178,746
<SALES>                                        260,805
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               260,805
<CGS>                                          170,742
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  229,107
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,660
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (113)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 31,811
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,059
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,752
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,752
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .64<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .61<F1>
<FN>
<F1>On December 2, 1998, the Company's Board of Directors authorized a 2-for-1
stock split effected in the form of a stock dividend. The distribution was made
on December 29, 1998 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on
December 8, 1998. Financial Data Schedules reported prior to the stock split
have not been restated to reflect this stock split.
</FN>


</TABLE>