alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-02-489-CR

MARCUS LEE TOLES	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM THE 372ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	------------

	Appellant Marcus Lee Toles perfected his appeal on November 26, 2002, by filing a notice of appeal.  On December 12, 2002, appellant filed a motion to withdraw his notice of appeal in the trial court.  The trial court held a hearing on the motion on the same day with appellant’s lawyer present.  At the hearing, appellant indicated that he understood his rights and the consequences of withdrawing his appeal and stated that he did not wish to appeal his conviction.  Because it is clear from appellant’s motion and statements at the hearing that he does not desire to continue his appeal, we suspend the requirement of rule 42.2(a) that appellant’s motion be filed in this court.  See Tex. R. App. P. 2, 42.2(a).  We dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).	

							PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	DAY, LIVINGSTON and DAUPHINOT, JJ.

		DO NOT PUBLISH

		Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

[DELIVERED: FEBRUARY 20, 2003]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group; NHLBI Mentored Transition to Independence Review Committee.                    

*Time:*                         March 3-4, 2016.                    

*Time:*                         8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         The William F. Bolger Center, 9600 Newbridge Drive, Potomac, MD 20854.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Giuseppe Pintucci, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7192, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-0287,                         *Pintuccig@nhlbi.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS) 

Dated: February 3, 2016.

Michelle Trout, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2016-02457 Filed 2-8-16; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 24.1
 
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
 
  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
filed on Forms S-8 in connection with the Company's 1988 Stock Option Plan.
The 1990 Stock Option Plan for Irish Employees, the 1991 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan, the 1991 Directors' Stock Option Plan, the 1983 Raycom Stock
Option Plan, the 1993 Raycom Stock Option Plan, the 1995 Executive Stock
Option Plan, and the 1996 Directors' Stock Option Plan of our report dated
January 23, 1998, except for the last paragraph of Note 2 as to which the date
is February 11, 1998, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Retix
for the year ended December 31, 1997.
 
Deloitte & Touche LLP
 
Los Angeles, California
February 27, 1998
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual Balance 

in 75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

-2.00% -4.34% 1.12% 1.20% -0.88% -3.14%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2009 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary, Social Security

September 23, 2009

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable)

Proposed Provision: Impose a 6 percent payroll tax on OASDI covered earnings above the current 

taxable maximum starting in 2010. Benefit computations would not reflect any earnings above the taxable 

maximum amount.

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this provision

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Year

Percent

Cost rates with this provision

Cost rates under present law

Income rates with this provision

Income rates under present law

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

 (assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

2009 2019 2029 2039 2049 2059 2069 2079

Year

Percent

Present law With this provision
Exhibit 10.4


 


Greenle Partners LLC Series Alpha P.S.


156 W Saddle River Road


Saddle River, New Jersey  07458


 


November 23, 2022


 


LuxUrban Hotels Inc.


2125 Biscayne Blvd

Suite 253

Miami, Florida 33137


 


Gentlemen:


 


Reference is made to the
Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of September 30, 2022 (the “Agreement”) between LuxUrban Hotels Inc.,
a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Greenle Partners LLC Series Alpha P.S., a Delaware limited liability
company (“Greenle”), as amended or supplemented to the date hereof. Terms used but not defined herein have the respective
meanings set forth in the Agreement.


 


Pursuant to Section 5.1(a) of
the Agreement, in connection with the Closing under the Agreement on October 20, 2022, Greenle has been issued Credits in the aggregate
amount of $1,466,250 (the “Subject Credits”). Greenle hereby elects to apply the Subject Credits in full to acquire
a 100% Credit Percentage in the Revenue Share with respect to the premises known as the Wagner Hotel located at 2 West Street, New York,
New York 10013 (the “Wagner Property”).


 


Notwithstanding the provisions
of Section 5.1(b) of the Agreement, the term “Applicable Percentage,” as it relates to the Wagner Property
(or to any Replacement Property that may replace the Wagner Property), shall mean for each of the first twenty (20) Revenue Share Periods
for such Property, eighteen percent (18%), and for each other Revenue Share Period during the Original Lease Term, three percent (3%);
provided, however, that when the Company makes the January 2023 payments as required under terms of the Series D 15% OID Senior
Secured Promissory Notes of the Company (the “Series D Notes”) issued on the date hereof under the terms of the Loan
Agreement dated as of the date hereof among the Company, Greenle and Greenle Partners LLC Series Beta P.S., the Applicable Percentage
for the Wagner Property (or for any Replacement Property that may replace the Wagner Property) shall be reduced to fourteen percent (14%)
for each of the first ten (10) Revenue Share Periods for such Property, eleven percent (11%) for each of the next ten (10) Revenue
Share Periods for such Property and three percent (3%) for each other Revenue Share Period during the Original Lease Term; and provided,
further, that if the Company fails to make such January 2023 payments or makes such payments and thereafter fails to make any other
payment under the Series D Notes when due, the Applicable Percentage shall reset to the original amount.


 






     


     


    

 


Greenle Partners LLC Series Alpha P.S.


November 23, 2022


Page 2


 


If the foregoing accurately sets forth our understanding
and agreement as to the matters set forth above, please acknowledge your agreement by signing below and returning to me a copy of this
letter.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	Greenle Partners LLC Series Alpha P.S.
	 	 
	 	By:	 
	 	 	Name: Alan Uryniak
	 	 	Title: Manager



 


	ACKNOWLEDGED and AGREED:	 
	 	 
	LuxUrban Hotels Inc.	 
	 	 
	By:	 	 
	 	Name:  Brian Ferdinand	 
	 	Title:    Chief
    Executive Officer
1

HLD-169 (July 2010) NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 10-1970

___________

FRED DOUGLAS VINING,

Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF 

PENNSYLVANIA; APPLIED POWDER TECHNOLOGY; 

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY; 

WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD, ET AL

____________________________________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Pennsylvania

(W.D. Pa. Civil No. 06-cv-00016)

District Judge: Honorable Gary L. Lancaster

____________________________________

Submitted for Possible Summary Action Pursuant

to Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6

July 30, 2010

Before: MCKEE, Chief Judge, SCIRICA and WEIS, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: October 5, 2010) 

_________

OPINION

_________

PER CURIAM.

Fred Douglas Vining, proceeding pro se, appeals an order of the United 

States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania denying a post-judgment 
2

order in his civil rights action.

In 2006, Vining filed a complaint claiming that the District Court had 

violated his civil and federal rights by dismissing a complaint he had previously filed 

against Applied Powder Technology, the Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry, 

and the Workers Compensation Appeals Board. Vining sued these same defendants 

again and added the District Court as a defendant. On January 20, 2006, the District 

Court dismissed Vining=s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(e)(2), noting that we 

had affirmed the dismissal of his earlier complaint and explaining that the District Court 

is immune from suit for decisions that it renders. Vining did not appeal.

Over four years later, Vining filed a motion to amend his complaint. 

Although Vining=s motion is unclear, he appears to contest the grounds for dismissal of 

his original complaint. The District Court denied the motion and this appeal followed.

Vining did not timely appeal the District Court=s January 20, 2006, order 

dismissing his complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(e)(2). Our jurisdiction is limited 

to a review of the District Court=s order denying Vining=s motion to amend his complaint 

from which he filed a timely notice of appeal. See Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 

209-10 (2007).
3

To the extent the District Court treated Vining=s filing as a motion to amend 

his complaint, the motion was properly denied because the District Court had dismissed 

Vining=s complaint with prejudice four years earlier. To the extent Vining=s motion 

could be construed a motion for relief from a judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 60(b), the motion was properly denied because it was not made within a 

reasonable time and was thus untimely. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(c)(1). 

Accordingly, because this appeal does not raise a substantial question, we

will affirm the District Court=s order.
Exhibit 23.3


INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT


To the Board of Directors of
Tremont Advisers, Inc.


We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No.  33-78346)  pertaining to the Tremont Advisers,  Inc.
Savings Plan (formerly the Tremont  Advisers,  Inc.  401(k) Savings Plan) of our
report dated February 18, 2000 on the financial  statements of American  Masters
Broad Market Prime Fund, L.P. (formerly The Broad Market Prime Fund, L.P.) as of
December  31,  1999 and for each of the two years in the period then ended which
report is included in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Tremont Advisers, Inc.
for the year ended December 31, 1999.



GOLDSTEIN GOLUB KESSLER LLP
New York, New York

March 16, 2000












                                       93
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 10, 2018

No. 04-18-00450-CV

Velma SAN MIGUEL,

Appellant

v.

PLAINSCAPITAL BANK, 

TRUSTEE OF THE GUERRA MINERAL TRUST.,

Appellee

From the 381st Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC-16-19

The Honorable Everardo Garcia, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant, Velma San Miguel’s Motion to Extend Time to File Appellant’s Brief is 

hereby GRANTED. Time is extended to September 13, 2018.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of September, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 240 (Thursday, December 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 64178]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30409]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service


Development Concept Plan; Final Environmental Impact Statement; 
Santa Rosa Island; Channel Islands National Park; Record of Decision

    Summary: Pursuant to Section 102(2) (C) of the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (P.L. 91-190 as amended), and 
specifically to regulations promulgated by the Council on Environmental 
Quality at 40 CFR 1505.2, the National Park Service, Department of the 
Interior, has approved a Record of Decision (ROD) for the Santa Rosa 
Island Development Concept Plan, Final Environmental Impact Statement, 
Channel Islands National Park, California.
    The National Park Service will implement the proposed plan as 
identified in the Final Environmental Impact Statement, issued in 
September, 1995.
    Copies of the Record of Decision and final environmental impact 
statement may be obtained from the Superintendent, Channel Islands 
National Park, 1901 Spinnaker Drive, Ventura, California 93001, or by 
calling the park at (805) 658-5700.

    Dated: December 5, 1995.
Stephen Crabtree,
Field Director, Pacific West Area.
[FR Doc. 95-30409 Filed 12-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
### Proposed Provision: F4. Expand covered earnings to include contributions to voluntary salary reduction plans (such as Cafeteria 125 plans and Flexible Spending Accounts). Starting in 2024, subject these contributions to the OASDI payroll tax, making the payroll tax treatment of these contributions like 401(k) contributions.
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

No. 21-10327 Summary Calendar

United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee ,

versus
Moris Franco,
Defendant—Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:18-CR-375-9

Before King, Costa, and Ho, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to repres ent Moris Franco has moved for leave to withdraw and has file d a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Franco has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 29, 2021 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-10327 Document: 00516109022 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/29/2021No. 21-10327

2 relevant portions of the record reflecte d therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED

. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Case: 21-10327 Document: 00516109022 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/29/2021
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), as Receiver for 10033 Suburban Federal Savings Bank, Crofton, Maryland (Receiver) has been authorized to take all actions necessary to terminate the receivership estate of Suburban Federal Savings Bank (Receivership Estate); the Receiver has made all dividend distributions required by law.

The Receiver has further irrevocably authorized and appointed FDIC-Corporate as its attorney-in-fact to execute and file any and all documents that may be required to be executed by the Receiver which FDIC-Corporate, in its sole discretion, deems necessary; including but not limited to releases, discharges, satisfactions, endorsements, assignments and deeds.

Effective February 1, 2016, the Receivership Estate has been terminated, the Receiver discharged, and the Receivership Estate has ceased to exist as a legal entity.

Dated: February 1, 2016.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Robert E. Feldman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2016-02134 Filed 2-3-16; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 27 (Thursday, February 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7759]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3261]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the 
Proposed Maple River Dam Project in Cass County, North Dakota

AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District, DOD.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The proposed action is to construct a 70-foot high zoned earth 
embankment dam on the Maple River in Cass County, North Dakota. The dam 
would be 1850 feet long with a top width of 30 feet and an emergency 
spillway consisting of a concrete chute to handle the 100-year events; 
a second stage emergency spillway consisting of a 1300-foot earthen cut 
in the right abutment which will handle the 200<plus-minus> year flows. 
The project would be operated essentially as a dry dam, with a very 
small pool. The proposed dam and spillways would be located primarily 
in the NE \1/4\ Sec 14, T 137N, R 54 W of Cass County. This location is 
approximately 8 miles northeast of Enderlin, North Dakota. The dam and 
reservoir would reduce the frequency of the full range of potential 
floods and thereby reduce the potential damage associated with these 
floods. Reduction in flood flows and damages would be the greatest in 
the Maple River and Sheyenne River valleys downstream of the project. 
The primary areas affected by the flooding are urban, agricultural, and 
environmental in nature. Approximately 15,000 acres are subject to 
flooding in addition to the urban areas of Durbin, and Mapleton, North 
Dakota as well as West Fargo and Harwood, North Dakota.
    Alternatives which are anticipated to be evaluated include similar 
dam sites and combinations of multiple dam sites as well as ``wet vs. 
dry'' dam concepts. The ``no action'' alternatives will also be 
evaluated.

DATE OF SCOPING MEETING: Public Scoping Meeting, March 15, 1995, 7 
p.m., Casselton Community Center, 701--1st Street North, Casselton, 
North Dakota.

ADDRESSES: Omaha District, Army Corps of Engineers, ATTN: CEMRO-PD-M, 
215 North 17th Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68102-4978.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Robert S. Nebel, Chief, 
Environmental Analysis Branch, Planning Division (402) 221-4598.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Future Schedule

    Following review of comments received during scoping, data 
collection and analysis will begin for the Draft Environmental Impact 
Statement (DEIS). The Corps anticipates that the DEIS will be released 
for public review in October 1995. A final Environmental Impact 
Statement is anticipated to be completed in early 1996.
Kenneth L. Denton,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-3261 Filed 2-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-62-M