alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           7,491
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   82,666
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     31,743
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               125,135
<PP&E>                                         226,284
<DEPRECIATION>                                  45,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 649,087
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          127,127
<BONDS>                                        287,215
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    216,067
<COMMON>                                         7,123
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   649,087
<SALES>                                        633,017
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               633,017
<CGS>                                          479,183
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  479,183
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (537)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,314
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,517
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,517
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,517
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Activant Solutions Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this quarterly report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
    5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:
   Date: August 12, 2005
 /s/ A. LAURENCE JONESA. Laurence JonesPresident & CEO
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meetings.

The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of General Medical Sciences Initial Review Group, Minority Programs Review Subcommittee A.                    

*Date:*                         June 28-29, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Bethesda Marriott, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Mona R. Trempe, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center Drive, Room 3AN12, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-3998,                         *trempemo@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 2, 2010.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-13703 Filed 6-7-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.2

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report (the "Report") on the Form 10-K/A of Siga
Resources, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended July 31, 2011, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Robert Malasek
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary Treasurer and Director, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
          15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.

Date: November 23, 2011


/s/ Robert Malasek
---------------------------------------------------------
Robert T. Malasek
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary Treasurer and Director
|EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF GUARANTY
BANCSHARES, INC.
PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Arthur B. Scharlach, Jr., Chief
Executive Officer of Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ending September 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
that:
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 1. | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Companys
financial condition and results of operations.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|By: /s/ Arthur B. Scharlach, Jr.

Arthur B. Scharlach, Jr.
President & Chief Executive Officer


Dated: November 13, 2003



30
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
E K. LINDEMAN 

## al 

# St. RT DEP CL IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
STEVEN SAMUEL BRAUNSTEIN, Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK, Respondent. No. 70224 

# FILED JUN 1 6 2016

CI_



### ORDER DENYING PETITION This is a pro se petition for a writ of mandamus or a writ of prohibition. Petitioner asks this court to order the clerk of the district court to file his motion to correct an illegal sentence. Having considered the documents submitted in this matter, we conclude that petitioner has not demonstrated that our intervention by extraordinary writ relief is warranted.' 

### See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) ("Petitioners carry the burden of demonstrating that
'Petitioner acknowledges that he has been declared a vexatious litigant by the district court and is thus restricted in his filing privileges, yet he fails to provide this court with the vexatious litigant order. Furthermore, he fails to provide any documents showing that the clerk of the district court refused to file his motion to correct an illegal sentence.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 194M att. 

# isql-ioextraordinary relief is warranted."); NRS 34.160; NRS 34.170; NRS

34.320; NRS 34.330. Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

Gibbons

cc: Steven Samuel Braunstein Attorney General/Carson City Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (01 1947A 

### e
SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN COMMISSION

CONSUMPTIVE USE MITIGATION GRANT

Project Applicant: 

Project Name: 

Date:

LANDOWNER CONSENT LETTER

I, ________________________________________ (Property Owner) do hereby authorize and 

agree to permit ________________________________________ (Applicant) to enter my 

property, with the intent to plan, design, construct, and/or maintain a consumptive use mitigation 

project on my property for the purpose of improving water quantity and/or quality conditions in 

the ________________________________________ (Watershed). 

I understand that if a Consumptive Use Mitigation Grant award is made by the Susquehanna River 

Basin Commission, I will need to execute a Landowner-Grantee Agreement with an Operation and 

Maintenance Plan in order for the grant award to be funded and the project to be implemented. 

This Agreement will identify specific maintenance tasks and the parties that will be responsible to 

perform those tasks to ensure that the consumptive use mitigation project is properly maintained. 

Property Owner Signature Applicant Signature 

Property Owner Name (Printed) Applicant Name (Printed)

Date Date
#### Charles H. Field and others, Appellants, v. The Lehigh Iron Company, Respondent.

— Judgment and order affirmed. Opinion by

Davis, P. J.
## Summary Measures and Graphs

- Individual Provisions
- Cost-of-Living Adjustment

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						A2: Starting December 2024, reduce the annual COLA by 0.5 percentage point.**

|  |  |
|--|--|
### Proposed Provision: E3.15. Increase the taxable maximum such that 90 percent of earnings are subject to the payroll tax (phased in 2024-2033). In addition, apply a tax rate of 6.2 percent for earnings above the revised taxable maximum (phased in from 2024-2033). Provide benefit credit for earnings taxed up to the revised taxable maximum.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             885
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,688
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     18,643
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           9,290
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             9,300
<LOANS>                                         59,020
<ALLOWANCE>                                        302
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  94,859
<DEPOSITS>                                      40,510
<SHORT-TERM>                                     9,200
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                120
<LONG-TERM>                                     30,089
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,723
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  94,859
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,074
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  443
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    65
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 1,582
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 426
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 933
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              649
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    205
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    203
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         203
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       133
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.85
<LOANS-NON>                                        337
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   302
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  302
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               302
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-1419

ANGELA NAILS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LIBERTY UNIVERSITY,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

LIBERTY UNIVERSITY FINANCIAL AID; LIBERTY UNIVERSITY 

FINANCIAL AID EMPLOYEES,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at 

Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (6:20-cv-00063-NKM)

Submitted: September 8, 2022 Decided: September 12, 2022

Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Angela Nails, Appellant Pro Se.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1419 Doc: 7 Filed: 09/12/2022 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1419 Doc: 7 Filed: 09/12/2022 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Angela Nails appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her amended complaint 

for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and denying her motion for 

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Nails v. Liberty Univ., No. 6:20-cv00063-NKM (W.D. Va. Feb. 17, 2022 & Apr. 7, 2022). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1419 Doc: 7 Filed: 09/12/2022 Pg: 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       7,944,595
<SECURITIES>                                 1,188,037
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,473,037
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (151,633)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,527,157
<PP&E>                                      13,417,190
<DEPRECIATION>                             (6,972,387)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,815,032
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,677,040
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       730,308
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,928,348
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,815,032
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            38,506,563
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             (23,330,004)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          (12,377,376)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (27,315)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,361,721
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (610,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,751,721
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,751,721
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.38 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.35
        

</TABLE>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellant,

v.

ALISHA MAKELL NEIL
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 1363

[ February 13, 2020 ]

Appeal of a non

- final order from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County ; Dan L. Vaughn , Judge; L.T. Case

No. 312018CF000306A

.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Joseph D. Coronato, Jr., and Jeanine Germanowicz, Assistant Attorneys Gener al, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Nancy Jack, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

W ARNER
, D AMOORGIAN and F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40861 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JAVIER LOPEZ CANTU, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-00-CV-154 USDC No. B-97-CR-20-1

-------------------- December 12, 2002 Before JOLLY, JONES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Javier Lopez Cantu, federal prisoner # 74613-079, appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, in which he challenged his 1996 sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 1,000 kilograms or more of marijuana. Cantu argues that his sentence violates Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), because the jury was not instructed to find a drug quantity.No. 01-40861 -2- The district court granted Cantu a certificate of appealability ("COA") because this court had not yet addressed whether Apprendi can be applied retroactively to an initial 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. This court recently concluded that Apprendi does not apply retroactively to cases on initial collateral review. See United States v. Brown , 305 F.3d 304, 310 (5th Cir. 2002). In Brown , we stated that " Apprendi creates a new rule of criminal procedure which is not retroactively applicable to initial petitions under [28 U.S.C.] § 2255." Id. Therefore, Cantu's Apprendi claim fails. Cantu also argues that his trial and appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance. We do not reach these issues because Cantu has not expressly sought to expand the district court's grant of COA to include them. See United States v. Kimler , 150 F.3d 429, 431 (5th Cir. 1998)(party must expressly seek a COA on additional issues not certified by the district court).
AFFIRMED.
JERRY GALLION,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D17-1840

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 6, 2017.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Steven B. Whittington, Judge.

Jerry Gallion, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, BILBREY, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.