alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
4852-3746-6781.3

EXHIBIT E

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3679-5 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:40:17 Page 1

of 2
4852-3746-6781.3 Exhibit E

DETAILED EXPENSE ENTRIES (COBLENTZ PATCH DUFFY & BASS LLP) FOR 

THE PERIOD JANUARY 29, 2019 THROUGH FEBRUARY 28 2019

Costs Advanced Amount

Messenger Service – Specialized Legal Services, Inc. (Invoice 322232) $70.00

Messenger Service – Specialized Legal Services, Inc. (Invoice 322232) $39.50

Taxi – Sean Coyle (Invoice 322234) $13.78

Discovery Vendor Litigation Binders/Copying – United Litigation Discovery 

(Invoice 323419)

$633.37

Filing Fee – OneLegal (Invoice 323420) $112.50

Sacramento Superior Court Website Subscription Fee for Case No. JCCP4974 –

CaseHomePage (Invoice 323420)

$105.00

Total Costs Requested: $974.15

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3679-5 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:40:17 Page 2

of 2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 246 (Friday, December 22, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66543-66544]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31133]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 66544]]



DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Notice of Application Tendered for Filing With the Commission

December 18, 1995.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been 
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Type of Application: Major License.
    b. Project No.: 11282-001.
    c. Date Filed: November 21, 1995.
    d. Applicant: Summit Hydropower.
    e. Name of Project: Gainer Dam.
    f. Location: On the North Branch Pawtuxet River, Town of Scituate, 
Providence County, Rhode Island.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791(a)-825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: Mr. Duncan S. Broatch, 92 Rocky Hill Road, 
Woodstock, CT 06281, (203) 974-1620.
    i. FERC Contact: Charles T. Raabe (dt) (202) 219-2811.
    j. Deadline Date: Within 60 days of the date filed shown in 
paragraph (c).
    k. Description of Project: The existing inoperative project would 
consist of: (1) a 3,500-foot-long, 109-foot-high earthen dam having a 
450-foot-long, overflow-type spillway at its right (southwest) 
abutment; (2) a reservoir, known as the Scituate Reservoir, having a 
3,400-acre surface area and a 112,270 acre-foot gross storage capacity 
at spillway crest elevation 283 feet MSL; (3) an intake structure; (4) 
a powerhouse containing a rehabilitated 1,500-kW generating unit 
operated at an 82-foot-net head and at a flow of 300 cfs and a new 70-
kW generating unit operated at an 82-foot-net head and at a flow of 14 
cfs; (5) a 400-foot-long tailrace tunnel and a 700-foot-long excavated 
tailrace; (6) a 500-foot-long underground, 2.3-kV transmission line; 
(7) a 2.3/23.-kV substation (8) a 1.5-mile-long 23.-kV transmission 
line; and (5) appurtenant facilities.
    The primary purpose for the existing facilities, owned by the 
Providence Water Supply Board (PWSB), is water supply for the City of 
Providence. Applicant estimates that the project average annual 
generation would be 2,968,000 kWh.
    1.With this notice, we are initiating consultation with the State 
Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), as required by Sec. 106, National 
Historic Preservation Act, and the regulations of the Advisory Council 
on Historic Preservation, 36 CFR, at Sec. 880.4.
    m. Pursuant to Sec. 4.32(b)(7) of 18 CFR of the Commission's 
Regulations, if any resource agency, SHPO, Indian Tribe, or person 
believes that an additional scientific study should be conducted in 
order to form an adequate factual basis for a complete analysis of the 
application on its merits, the resource agency, SHPO, Indian Tribe, or 
person must file a request for a study with the Commission not later 
than 60 days from the filing date and serve a copy of the request on 
the applicant.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-31133 Filed 12-21-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### STATE v. NATHAN CURLING.

(Filed 19 September, 1945.)

Appeal by defendant from *Burney, J.,*at July Term, 1945, of WASHINGTON.

The defendant was tried and convicted upon a bill of indictment charging him with an assault with intent to commit rape, and from judgment of imprisonment, predicated on the verdict, appealed to the Supreme Court, assigning error.

*Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorneys-General Rhodes, Moody, and Tuclcer for the State.*

*W. L. Whitley for the defendant.*

Per Curiam.

The exceptions most stressfully argued on this appeal by the appellant, both orally and by brief, are the ones which relate to the court’s refusal to grant the defendant’s motion to dismiss the action or for judgment of nonsuit duly lodged when the State had produced its evidence and rested its case and renewed after all the evidence was concluded, G. S., 15-173.

The defendant’s appeal is virtually from the finding of the jury. We have carefully examined the record and are of the opinion that there is sufficient competent evidence to sustain the allegations of the indictment.

*770We have also considered all tbe exceptions set out in tbe appellant’s brief and are of tbe opinion tbat no error prejudicial to tbe defendant was committed either in tbe ruling of tbe court upon tbe admission or exclusion of evidence, or in tbe charge to tbe jury.

Since no new questions are presented on this appeal, it is not deemed necessary or expedient to discuss tbe exceptions set out in detail.

In tbe trial before tbe Superior Court we find

No error.
#### Samuel P. Hyman, Respondent, v. Jacob Kapp, Appellant

—Four actions. Orders affirmed, with ten dollars costs of one appeal and the disbursements in all. Opinion by

Daniels, J.
#### George Hayward, Respondent, v. John W. Sayer, Appellant.

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. *Held,*that the court erred in allowing an inquiry to be made of a witness as to whether he nad been accused of crime.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 236 (Friday, December 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63047-63048]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-29934]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration 
(SAMHSA) Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of the 
meeting of 

[[Page 63048]]
the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) 
National Advisory Council in January 1996.
    The meeting of the SAMHSA National Advisory Council will include 
discussions concerning SAMHSA's Reauthorization; update on SAMHSA's 
demonstration program; SAMHSA's Managed Care Initiative, including the 
role of SAMHSA in developing mental health and substance abuse 
standards for managed care facilities; report on the Performance 
Partnership Development Process and Regional Meetings; and a report on 
the Co-Occurring Meeting. In addition various constituency 
organizations will be describing their collaborative efforts around the 
development of performance measures and outcomes monitoring, and 
exemplary community based programs will be describing their efforts to 
prevent and treat mental and addictive disorders. Finally, there will 
be status reports by the Council's work groups on Health Care Reform 
and Children's Services. Attendance by the public will be limited to 
space available.
    The meeting will also include the review, discussion and evaluation 
of contract proposals. Therefore a portion of the meeting will be 
closed to the public as determined by the Administrator, SAMHSA, in 
accordance with Title 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (3), (4) and (6) and 5 U.S.C. 
app. 2 10(d).
    A summary of the meeting and a roster of Council members may be 
obtained from: Ms. Susan E. Day, Program Assistant, SAMHSA National 
Advisory Council, 5600 Fishers Lane, Room 12C-15, Rockville, Maryland 
20857. Telephone: (301) 443-4640.
    Substantive program information may be obtained from the contact 
whose name and telephone number is listed below.

    Committee Name: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services 
Administration, National Advisory Council.
    Meeting Date: January 22, 1996.
    Place: Omni-Shoreham Hotel, 2500 Calvert Street, N.W., 
Washington, DC 20008.
    Open: January 22, 1996, 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Closed: January 22, 1996, 5:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Contact: Toian Vaughn, Room 12C-15, Parklawn Building, telephone 
(301) 443-4640 and FAX (301) 443-1450.

    Dated: December 4, 1995.
Jeri Lipov,
Committee Management Officer, Substance Abuse and Mental Health 
Services Administration.
[FR Doc. 95-29934 Filed 12-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report dated July 27, 2001 included in this Form 10-K into the
Company's previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8, File Nos. 333-
20057, 333-20073 and 333-31398. It should be noted that we have not audited any
financial statements of the Company subsequent to June 30, 2001 or performed any
audit procedures subsequent to the date of our report.

                              /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN

                              Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
                              September 28, 2001
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,448
<SECURITIES>                                     3,901
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,570
<ALLOWANCES>                                        20
<INVENTORY>                                      6,549
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,296
<PP&E>                                           1,754
<DEPRECIATION>                                     527
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,555
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,906
<BONDS>                                             11
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           111
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,530
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,555
<SALES>                                         20,556
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,581
<CGS>                                           10,491
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,491
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,989
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  65
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,036
<INCOME-TAX>                                       834
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,202
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,202
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10
        

</TABLE>
## Change in Name Popularity

- Background information
- Change in Popularity
- Statistics on popularity change
-  Popularity of name     					  										  

### Change in popularity from 2022 to 2023

Tables provide the change in popularity from 2022 to 2023. Links to these tables are below.Names at the top of a list have the greatest change in popularity, while those at the bottom havethe smallest change in popularity.  Generally, the more popular a name, the smaller the change in popularity.
For each year, rank 1 indicates the most popular name, rank 2 the next most popular, and so forth. A change in popularity is indicated by the difference, either an increase or decrease, in ranks from one yearto the next.  We compared ranks for both years only if a name was in the top 1000 in at least one of the 2 years.
- Names that increased in popularity 
- Names that decreased in popularity 
- Names having about the same popularity 
Footer menu
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

SHANE HOLLOWAY,

Petitioner

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 188 MM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of February, 2019, the Petition for Leave to File Notice of 

Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6763

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ANTHONY JOHNSON, a/k/a AJ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., 

Chief District Judge. (2:95-cr-00249-TDS-7)

Submitted: January 18, 2012 Decided: February 8, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, 

Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, 

Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Johnson appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for 

reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. United States v. Johnson, No. 2:95-cr00249-TDS-7 (M.D.N.C. June 2, 2011). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-167479 on Form S-3
of our reports dated February 28, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements of KKR Financial Holdings LLC and subsidiaries (the "Company") (which report expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company's adoption of the new accounting guidance which amended the accounting for the transfers of financial assets and the
consolidation of variable interest entities), and the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of KKR
Financial Holdings LLC for the year ended December 31, 2010.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San
Francisco, California
February 28, 2011

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 12.01

                      FISHER SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL INC.
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                       (IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT RATIO AMOUNTS)





<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                              Year Ended December 31,
                                                           -------         -------      ------     -------      ------
                                                            2005             2004        2003        2002        2001
                                                           -------         -------      ------     -------      ------
<S>                                                        <C>             <C>          <C>        <C>          <C>
Pre-tax income from continuing operations
     before adjustment for loss from equity investees      $ 485.5         $ 186.6     $  94.9     $ 142.6     $  36.3
                                                           =======         =======     =======     =======     =======



Fixed Charges:

Interest expense and amortization of debt discount and
     premium on all indebtedness                           $ 109.3         $ 104.8     $  84.8     $ 91.3      $  99.5

20% of rental expense                                          8.9             7.4         4.7         4.6         4.1
                                                           -------         -------     -------     -------     -------
     Total fixed charges                                   $ 118.2         $ 112.2     $  89.5     $  95.9     $ 103.6
                                                           =======         =======     =======     =======     =======


Pre-tax income from continuing operations
     before adjustment for loss from equity investees
     plus fixed charges                                    $ 603.7         $ 298.8     $ 184.4     $ 238.5     $ 139.9



Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (A)                        5.11            2.66        2.06        2.49        1.35
</TABLE>

(A)   For the purpose of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges,
      earnings consist of income before provision for income taxes and before
      adjustment for loss from equity investees plus fixed charges. Fixed
      charges consist of interest charges, amortization of debt discount or
      premium related to indebtedness, whether expensed or capitalized, and that
      portion of rental expense we believe to be representative of interest.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 2, 2016

No. 04-16-00069-CR

Delmis Edmond SHIELDS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 5475

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The appellant’s second motion for extension of time to file their brief is granted. The 

appellant’s brief is due on July 1, 2016. No further extensions of time will be granted absent 

extraordinary circumstances.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 2nd day of June, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 23



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


               We consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 33-48364), (ii) the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 33-66306) and (iii) the Registration Statement
on Form S-3 (File No. 33-59734) of our reports dated September 9, 1997, on our
audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule
of Pharmaceutical Marketing Services Inc. and Subsidiaries as of June 30, 1996
and 1997, and the years ended June 30, 1995, 1996 and 1997, which reports are
included in this Form 10-K.









                                                        COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.


Stamford, Connecticut
September 15, 1997
Exhibit 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in  Registration  Statement  No.
333-35580 on Form S-3 and Registration  Statement Nos. 333-30882,  333-70608 and
333-119123  on Forms S-8 of our report dated April 28,  2006,  appearing in this
Annual  Report on Form 10-K of E Com  Ventures,  Inc. for the year ended January
28, 2006.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
-------------------------


Fort Lauderdale, Florida
April 28, 2006
#### GUY M. BEATY, MRS. GUY M. BEATY, GUY M. BEATY, JR., MILDRED BEATY, ROY W. BEATY and J. WILLIAM BARNETTE partners, doing business as GUY M. BEATY & COMPANY v. SHEET METAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ROSS & WITMER, INC., a corporation, SOUTHEASTERN REALTY COMPANY, a corporation.

(Filed 9 April, 1958)

Appeal by defendant union from *Moore (Dan K.), J.,*December 9, 1957 Civil Term of MeCKlenbuRG.

*Blakeney & Alexander and Ernest W. Machen, Jr., for plaintiff, ap-pellees.*

*Robert 0. Sanders and J. C. Sedberry, for defendant, appellant.*

PeR Curiam.

This is a companion suit to *Beaty et al. v. International Association of Heat & Frost Insulators & Asbestos Workers, ante,*170. It grows out of acts of defendant touching plaintiff's contract to do certain work in Charlotte. Defendant union, as in that case, moved to quash the service of process. The court made identical findings of fact on substantially the same factual situation as there portrayed. The decision in that case is controlling here.

Affirmed.
ex4-13.htm


Exhibit 4.13

 

CERTIFICATE OF TRUST OF

METRO CAPITAL TRUST V

 





 

This Certificate of Trust of Metro Capital Trust V (the “Trust’) is being duly executed and filed by the undersigned, as trustee, to form a statutory trust under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act (12 Delaware Code § 3801 et seq.) (the “Act”).

 

1.           Name.  The name of the statutory trust formed by this Certificate of Trust is: “Metro Capital Trust V.”

 

2.           Delaware Trustee.  The name and business address of the trustee of the Trust with its principal place of business in the State of Delaware are Wilmington Trust Company, Rodney Square North, 1100 North
Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19890-0001, Attention: Corporate Trust Administration.

 

3.           Effective Date.  This Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon filing with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of Trust in accordance with Section 3811(a)(1) of the Act.

 


	  	
WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY,

	  	
not in its individual capacity but solely as trustee

	  	  
	  	
By: /s/ Michael H. Wass

	  	
Name: Michael H. Wass

	  	
Title:   Financial Services Officer
### Proposed Provision: B3.11. Increase the first PIA factor from 90 percent to 93 percent for all beneficiaries eligible as of January 2025 and for those newly eligible for benefits after 2024.
Skip to main content

# Social Security

Search
Menu
Español
Sign in

## Selected Data from Social Security's Disability Program

Office of the Chief Actuary Statistical TablesDisabled-worker beneficiary statisticsBeneficiary data

****Graphs of disabled worker data**(Numbers in thousands)Footer menu**
#### Electus B. Litchfield, Plaintiff, v. Charles R. Flint, Defendant.

— Judgment modified in accordance with opinion order to be settled by Pratt, J. Opinion by

Pratt, J.
# EXHIBIT 23.1

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our report included in this Form 10-K, into
Dendrite International, Inc.s previously filed Form S-8 Registration Statement File
Nos. 333-14363, 333-19141, 333-24329, 333-35701, 333-81783, 333-92711,  333-48376, 333-09090, 333-09092, 333-11036 and 333-68218 and
Form S-3 Registration Statement File No. 333-91449.

| |  | /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
| |  | -----------------------

Philadelphia, PA
March 28, 2002

_________________
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-20-00140-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2

Denton County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV-2020-00236-JP

Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

AUTOSOUND & SECURITY, INC., Appellant

V.

KATO BUILDING COMPANY, LTD., Appellee
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered “Appellant's Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” We 

grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Each party must bear its own costs of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered: August 20, 2020