alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1
                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO\
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report of Alec Bradley Cigar
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Alan Rubin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Date:  August 10, 2005


/s/ Alan Rubin
--------------
Alan Rubin
Chief Executive Officer
J. S55010/15

* Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court. NON

- PRECEDENTIAL DECISION

– SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

ELIZABETH MALONEY,
AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE
OF ELIZABETH JANE RUDOLF :

:

: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

:

v. :

: EXTENDICARE HOMES, INC., D/B/A

BELAIR HEALTH AND REHABIL ITATION CENTER; EXTENDICARE HEALTH FACILITIES, INC.; EXTENDICARE HEALTH FACILITY HOLDINGS, INC.; EXTENDICARE HEALTH SERVICES, INC.; EXTENDICARE HOLDINGS, INC.; EXTENDICARE REIT; EXTENDICARE, L.P.; AND EXTENDICARE, INC., :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 1830 W DA 2014

: Appellants :

Appeal from the Order Entered, October 9, 2014, in the Court of Common Pleas of Westmoreland County

Civil Division at No. 7819 of 2012

BEFORE: FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E., BENDER, P.J.E., AND STRA SSBURGER, J.*

JUDGMENT ORDER BY FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E.: FILED NOVEMBER 05, 2015

Extendicare Homes, Inc., d/b/a Belair Health and Rehabilitation

Center, et al. (collectively, “Extendicare”), appeal from the order entered

October 9, 2014, overruling Exten dicare’s preliminary objections in the

nature of a demurrer in this wrongful death and survival action. The trial

court found that the arbitration agreement entered into by the decedent,

Elizabeth Jane Rudolf or her authorized representative, was not bind ing upon

the non

- signatory wrongful death beneficiaries, and they could not beJ. S55010/15

- 2

-

deemed to have waived their right to a jury trial by the actions of the

decedent’s representative. As such, the trial court determined that the

beneficiaries bringing the wrong ful death action in the instant case cannot be

compelled to litigate their claims in arbitration.

Furthermore, the trial court refused to sever the survival action and

compel arbitration on that claim. The trial court ruled that Pa.R.C.P. 213(e)

requires that survival actions be consolidated with wrongful death actions for

trial. Therefore, the trial court refused to enforce the arbitration agreement.

This matter is directly controlled by recent case law from this court

including Tuomi v. Extendicare, I nc. , A.3d , 2015 WL 3791409

(Pa.Super. June 18, 2015); Taylor v. Extendicare Health Facilities, Inc.

,

113 A.3d 317 (Pa.Super. 2015), appeal granted

, A.3d , 2015 WL

5569766 (Pa. 2015); and Pisano v. Extendicare Homes, Inc. , 77 A.3d

651 (Pa.Super. 2013), appeal denied , 86 A.3d 233 (Pa. 2014), cert.

denied

, U.S. , 134 S.Ct. 2890 (2014). See Marks v. Nationwide

Ins. Co. , 762 A.2d 1098, 1101 (Pa.Super. 2000) (this court continues to

follow controlling precedent as long as decisi on has not been overturned by

our supreme court), appeal denied , 788 A.2d 381 (Pa. 2001). These

decisions address the precise points raised in the case sub judice . The trial

court did not err in refusing to compel private arbitration of the survival

clai m.

Order affirmed.J. S55010/15

- 3

-

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary

Date: 11/5/2015
## Actuarial Life Table

- Office of the Chief Actuary
- Life Tables

A period life table is based on the mortality experience of a population     during a relatively short period of time.  Here we present the 2021 period life table     for the Social Security area population, as used in the 2024 Trustees Report (TR).     For this table, the period life expectancy at a given age is the average remaining number 	 of years expected prior to death for a person at that exact age, born on January 1, using the mortality 	 rates for 2021 over the course of his or her remaining life. 

This life table is available for certain other years.
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 0.54 0.69 15% 16%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

August 1, 2023

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Cost-of-Living Adjustment

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: A8. Starting December 2024, for OASI beneficiaries only (DI beneficiaries would only 

be affected when their benefit converts to OASI at NRA), the annual COLA would be based on the chainweighted version of the CPI-U.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision
Exhibit 10.26


 


English Translation of 


Supplement to Software Development Supplement
Agreement


 


Party A: Caibaoyun Settlement Technology (Xi’an)
Co., Ltd.


Address: Room 418, SanCai Building, No. 6, 2nd
Fengcheng Rd. Xi’an Economic Development Zone


contacts: Wen, Ning


contact number: 13571336888


 


Party B: Xi'an RenLieRen Information Technology
Service Co., Ltd.


Address: Room 301 JvZe Hotel, No. 199 WeiYang
St. Xi’an Economic Development Zone


contacts: Yang, Rong


contact number:15191816481


 


Signing date: October 21, 2021


 


Party A and Party B signed a Software Development
Agreement on October 21, 2020. Pursuant to which the parties agreed that the term of the agreement is “12 months from the signing
of the agreement”. After discussion, both parties agreed to extend the agreement service term by another 12 months, which means
the service agreement is still valid for 12 months after signing this supplementary agreement.


 


After the agreement finishes, if parties do not
send any formal written notice, the agreement term will automatically extend for another 12 months.


 


This agreement is valid after being signed by
both parties. Each party holds a copy, which are both legally effective.


 


Any content not included in this supplementary
agreement will follow the original agreement and other supplementary agreements, if any.


 


No more content after this.


 


Party A: Caibaoyun Settlement Technology (Xi’an)
Co., Ltd. (sealed)


Party B: Xi'an RenLieRen Information Technology Service Co., Ltd. (sealed)
#### Abigail H. Bennet, Plaintiff, v. Elihu G. Akin and others, Defendants.

Motion for reargument or modification denied, with ten dollars costs.

Opinion by

Learned, P. J.
#### Jeffrey A. Plantz, Respondent, v Wayne Cooperative Insurance Company, Appellant.

[773 NYS2d 635]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Wayne County (Stephen R. Sirkin, J.), entered September 18, 2002. The order, inter alia, denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint in a declaratory judgment action.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Defendant contends on appeal that Supreme Court erred in denying its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. We affirm, and we note that, as we previously wrote in *Kumar v Travelers Ins. Co.*(211 AD2d 128, 132 [1995]), the insurer’s “agreement to pay the full cost to repair or replace the damaged dwelling with equivalent construction on the same premises merely establishes the limits of coverage . . . The insured is not required ... to replace the damaged dwelling on the same premises in order to recover replacement cost.” Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Scudder, Kehoe, Gorski and Hayes, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5687 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5687

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 9, 2014

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 101 East Market Street in Long Beach, California, as the ``Juanita 
                   Millender-McDonald Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JUANITA MILLENDER-MCDONALD POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 101 East Market Street in Long Beach, California, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Juanita Millender-McDonald Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Juanita 
Millender-McDonald Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 8, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 236 (Friday, December 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63046-63047]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-29928]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Ocean Freight Forwarder License Revocations

    The Federal Maritime Commission hereby gives notice that the 
following freight forwarder licenses are revoked pursuant to section 19 
of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. app. 1718) and the regulations 
of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of ocean freight 
forwarders, effective on the corresponding revocation dates shown 
below:

License Number: 657

[[Page 63047]]

Name: Spartan Overseas Shipping Corp.
Address: 181 South Franklin Ave., Valley Stream, NY 11581
Date Revoked: November 1, 1995
Reason: Surrendered license voluntarily.

License Number: 3382
Name: W.I.D.E. Corporation
Address: 850 Center Drive, Elizabeth, NJ 07201
Date Revoked: November 5, 1995
Reason: Failed to maintain a valid surety bond.

License Number: 2097
Name: Concept Cargo, Inc.
Address: 8269-8287 N.W. 54th Street, Miami, FL 33166
Date Revoked: November 20, 1995
Reason: Surrendered license voluntarily.

License Number: 2825
Name: Henry L. Rosich dba Rosich Forwarding Company
Address: 409 Warren Boulevard, Broomall, PA 19008
Date Revoked: November 20, 1995
Reason: Surrendered license voluntarily.
Bryant L. VanBrakle,
Director, Bureau of Tariffs, Certification and Licensing.
[FR Doc. 95-29928 Filed 12-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5705 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5705

  To modify certain provisions relating to the Propane Education and 
                           Research Council.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 13, 2014

  Mr. Latta (for himself and Mr. Walz) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To modify certain provisions relating to the Propane Education and 
                           Research Council.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Propane Education and Research 
Enhancement Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE PROPANE EDUCATION AND RESEARCH 
              COUNCIL.

    (a) Functions of Propane Education and Research Council.--Section 
5(f) of the Propane Education and Research Act of 1996 (15 U.S.C. 
6404(f)) is amended in the first sentence by inserting ``to train 
propane distributors and consumers in strategies to mitigate negative 
effects of future propane price spikes,'' after ``to enhance consumer 
and employee safety and training,''.
    (b) Market Survey and Consumer Protection Price Analysis.--Section 
9(a) of the Propane Education and Research Act of 1996 (15 U.S.C. 
6408(a)) is amended in the first sentence by striking ``only data 
provided by the Energy Information Administration'' and inserting ``the 
refiner price to end users of consumer grade propane, as published by 
the Energy Information Administration''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Washington  Banking  Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending  September 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Phyllis A. Hawkins, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

This  certification is being furnished solely to comply with the requirements of
18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, and shall not be  incorporated by reference into any of
the  Company's  filings  under  the  Securities  Act of 1933  or the  Securities
Exchange Act of  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  or otherwise be deemed to be
filed as part of the Report or under such Acts.


/s/ Phyllis A. Hawkins
----------------------------
Phyllis A. Hawkins
Chief Financial Officer


November 13, 2002
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 18

- 00283

- CV

EVERETT A. LAAS

AND ANNIE K. LAAS

, Appellant s

v.

THEODORE R. KEHTEL

AND JENNIFER C. KEHT EL

, Appellee s

From the 369th District Court

Leon County, Texas

Trial Court No. O

- 12

- 00496

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On September 21, 2018 , the Clerk of this Court notified Appellant s that the $ 205

filing fee in this cause was past due and that the appeal would be dismissed if Appellant s

did not either establish the right to proceed without payment of costs or pay the filing fee

within fourteen days of the date of the letter. No respo nse has been received from

Appellant s . Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c).Laas v. Kehtel Page 2 REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal dismissed

Opinion de livered and filed October 24, 2018

[CV06]
SOCIAL SECURITY

Office of the Chief Actuary

January 29, 2024

The Honorable Sherrod Brown

United States Senate

Washington, D.C. 20510

The Honorable Bill Cassidy

United States Senate

Washington, D.C. 20510

Dear Senator Brown and Senator Cassidy:

I am writing in response to your request for our estimate of the program cost effects for the 

Federal Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program of enacting S. 2767, the “SSI Savings 

Penalty Elimination Act,” which you and several other Senators introduced on September 12, 

2023. This Bill, as introduced, would increase the limit on countable resources from $2,000 for 

unmarried individuals and $3,000 for married couples to $10,000 for unmarried individuals and 

$20,000 for married couples in 2023 and index these resource limits in 2024 and later by the 

annual percentage change in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U). For 

the purpose of estimates provided here we are assuming that the specified increases in limits 

would apply upon enactment in 2024, and would be indexed in years thereafter, starting in 2025.

We have enjoyed working with Chad Bolt, David Timmons, and Parker Reynolds in the 

development of this proposal. Our analysis and estimates provided for this proposal reflect the 

efforts of many in the Office of the Chief Actuary, but particularly Amir Levy, Chelsea Shudtz, 

and Michael Stephens.

Enactment of this Bill would result in an increase in program cost because some individuals who 

have countable resources above the current-law limits would become eligible or maintain 

eligibility under this proposal. If the bill became effective for eligibility starting January 1, 2024, 

we estimate the increase in Federal SSI payments would be $9.8 billion over the calendar year 

period 2023 through 2032. Table 1 below provides our estimates of the cost increases on an 

annual basis through 2032. All estimates are based on the assumptions underlying the projections 

presented in the 2023 SSI Annual Report.1 This Bill would not have any direct effects on the 

financial status of the Social Security trust funds.

We hope these estimates will be helpful. Please let us know if we may provide further assistance.

Sincerely,

 

Stephen C. Goss, ASA, MAAA

Chief Actuary

1 See chapter IV in the report at https://www.ssa.gov/OACT/ssir/SSI23/index.html for details. The projections in this 

report are consistent with the intermediate projections in the 2023 Social Security Trustees Report.
Page 2 – The Honorable Sherrod Brown and Bill Cassidy

Table 1: Estimated Change in Federal SSI Program Cost for Enacting 

S. 2767, the “SSI Savings Penalty Elimination Act”

(In billions)

Calendar Year Total 

2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2023-32

Estimated change in Federal SSI payments -- $0.5 $1.0 $1.0 $1.1 $1.1 $1.1 $1.2 $1.3 $1.4 $9.8

Office of the Chief Actuary, SSA

January 29, 2024
Isabel 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 26, 2015

No. 04-14-00821-CV

CITY OF CARRIZO SPRINGS and Adrian DeLeon, individually and as Mayor of the City of 

Carrizo Springs,

Appellants

v.

Isabel CUMPIAN, Bill Martin, Alfredo Z. Padilla, Individually and on behalf of the Carrizo 

Springs Housing Authority,

Appellees

From the 365th Judicial District Court, Dimmit County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14-09-12375-DCV-AJA

Honorable Amado J. Abascal, III, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The parties’ joint motion is granted. We order that all deadlines in this appeal are 

suspended until February 10, 2015. We further order appellant to file a status report with this 

court not later than February 10, 2015. 

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 26th day of January, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 12

- 00402

- CR

Derrick WOOLRIDGE

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011CR9661

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE BARNARD , AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED February 19, 2014.

_____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 32359]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13476]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE



Forest Service




Upper Rio Grande Resource Advisory Committee



AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.



ACTION: Notice of meeting.



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



SUMMARY: The Upper Rio Grande Resource Advisory Committee will meet in 

South Fork, Colorado. The committee is meeting as authorized under the 

Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act (Pub. L. 110-

343) and in compliance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The 

purpose is to hold the first meeting of the newly formed committee.



DATES: The meeting will be held on June 22, 2010, and will begin at 1 

p.m.



ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the South Fork Community 

Building, 0254 Highway 149, South Fork, Colorado. Written comments 

should be sent to Mike Blakeman, San Luis Valley Public Lands Center, 

1803 West U.S. Highway 160, Monte Vista, CO 81144. Comments may also be 

sent via e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#670a050b060c020a060927011449010203491214"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0d606f616c6668606c634d6b7e236b686923787e">[email protected]</span></a>, or via facsimile to 719-852-

6250.

    All comments, including names and addresses when provided, are 

placed in the record and are available for public inspection and 

copying. The public may inspect comments received at the San Luis 

Valley Public Lands Center, 1803 West U.S. Highway 160, Monte Vista, CO 

81144.



FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mike Blakeman, RAC coordinator, USDA, 

San Luis Valley Public Lands Center, 1803 West U.S. Highway 160, Monte 

Vista, CO 81144; 719-852-6212; E-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5f323d333e343a323e311f392c71393a3b712a2c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9cf1fef0fdf7f9f1fdf2dcfaefb2faf9f8b2e9ef">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) 

may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 

between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, Monday through 

Friday.



SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. The 

following business will be conducted: (1) Introductions of all 

committee members, replacement members and Forest Service personnel. 

(2) Selection of a chairperson by the committee members. (3) Receive 

materials explaining the process for considering and recommending Title 

II projects; and (4) Public Comment. Persons who wish to bring related 

matters to the attention of the Committee may file written statements 

with the Committee staff before or after the meeting.



    Dated: May 26, 2010.

Dan S. Dallas,

Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 2010-13476 Filed 6-7-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M




</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>