alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 243 (Tuesday, December 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 65367]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30710]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[File No. 1-10814]


Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application to Withdraw From Listing 
and Registration; (ReadiCare, Inc., Common Stock, $.01 Par Value)

December 13, 1995.
    ReadiCare, Inc. (``Company'') has filed an application with the 
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to 
Section 12(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') and Rule 
12d2-2(d) promulgated thereunder, to withdraw the above specified 
security (``Security'') from listing and registration on the American 
Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Amex'').
    The reasons alleged in the application for withdrawing the Security 
from listing and registration include the following:
    According to the Company, its Board of Directors unanimously 
approved resolutions on October 24, 1995 to withdraw the Security from 
listing on the Amex and instead, to list the Security on the Nasdaq 
National Market.
    The decision of the Board followed a lengthy review of the matter 
and was based upon the belief that listing the Security on the Nasdaq/
NMS will be more beneficial to the Company's stockholders than the 
present listing on the Amex for the following reasons:
    (a) The Company believes that the Nasdaq/NM system of competing 
market makers will result in increased visibility and sponsorship for 
the Security than is presently available on the Amex;
    (b) The Company believes that the Nasdaq/NM system will offer an 
opportunity for the Company to secure its own group of market makers 
and to expand the capital base available for trading in the Security; 
and
    (c) The Company believes that the firms making a market in the 
Security on the Nasdaq/NM system will also be inclined to issue 
research reports concerning the Company, thereby increasing the number 
of firms providing institutional research and advisory reports to the 
investment community.
    Any interested person may, on or before January 5, 1996 submit by 
letter to the Secretary of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 
Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, facts bearing upon whether 
the application has been made in accordance with the rules of the 
exchanges and what terms, if any, should be imposed by the Commission 
for the protection of investors. The Commission, based on the 
information submitted to it, will issue an order granting the 
application after the date mentioned above, unless the Commission 
determines to order a hearing on the matter.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
pursuant to delegated authority.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-30710 Filed 12-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4193 Filed: 10/11/19 Entered: 10/11/19 10:27:24 Page 1 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4193 Filed: 10/11/19 Entered: 10/11/19 10:27:24 Page 2 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4193 Filed: 10/11/19 Entered: 10/11/19 10:27:24 Page 3 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4193 Filed: 10/11/19 Entered: 10/11/19 10:27:24 Page 4 of

4
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

          - [Docket No. 16-02]

Notice is given that a complaint has been filed with the Federal Maritime Commission (Commission) by D.F. Young, Inc., hereinafter “Complainant,” against NYK Line (North America) Inc., hereinafter “Respondent.” Complainant states that it is an ocean transportation intermediary licensed by the Commission and a Pennsylvania corporation. Complainant alleges that Respondent is a New York corporation and a common carrier of goods by water.

Complainant alleges that Respondent has violated the Shipping Act, 46 U.S.C. 41102, and the Commission's regulations at 46 CFR 515.42 “by refusing to compensate Complainant for the freight forwarding services performed on Ford [Motor Company] shipments placed on vessels owned/and or operated by Respondent and/or its agents or affiliates, for which Respondent received freight charges, according to the terms of the Respondent's applicable tariffs . . . .”

Complainant seeks an award of reparations in the amount of $252,776.89, plus interest and attorneys fees, “a payment of additional amounts, not exceeding twice the amount of any award for injuries” if violation of 46 U.S.C. 41103(3) be shown, and “other such relief or award as the FMC shall determine.”

                    The full text of the complaint can be found in the Commission's Electronic Reading Room at                     *www.fmc.gov/​16-02.*

This proceeding has been assigned to the Office of Administrative Law Judges. The initial decision of the presiding officer in this proceeding shall be issued by February 3, 2017, and the final decision of the Commission shall be issued by August 17, 2017.

Karen V. Gregory,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2016-02453 Filed 2-8-16; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6731-AA-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 27, 2016

p0120

Order 

Clerk

January 27, 2016

152363

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 152363

COA: 326718

Eaton CC: 12-000370-FH

HEIP THE TRINH,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 14, 2015 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
4818-5545-8734.1

EXHIBIT C

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5227-3 Filed: 12/31/19 Entered: 12/31/19 07:28:24 Page 1

of 2
4818-5545-8734.1 Exhibit C

EXPENSE SUMMARY (COBLENTZ PATCH DUFFY & BASS LLP) FOR THE PERIOD 

NOVEMBER 1, 2019 THROUGH NOVEMBER 30, 2019

EXPENSES AMOUNTS

Computerized Research N/A

Meals N/A

Travel N/A

Transportation N/A

Duplicating N/A

Transcription (Deposition) Services N/A

Third Party Consulting Fees N/A

Telephone Conferencing N/A

Messenger N/A

Filing Fees N/A

Court Reporter $3,854.63

Court Website Subscription Fee for Case No. JCCP4974 N/A

Total Expenses Requested: $3,854.63

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5227-3 Filed: 12/31/19 Entered: 12/31/19 07:28:24 Page 2

of 2
Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

BILL OF COSTS

No. 01-14-00762-CV

In the Matter of B. D. S.

NO. 2013-06337J IN THE 313TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/DUE STATUS PAID BY

MT FEE

RPT RECORD

CLK RECORD

FILING

$10.00

$336.60

$15.00

$195.00

02/17/2015

01/16/2015

09/18/2014

09/12/2014

EXEMPT

PAID

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

ANT

STA

ANT

ANT

The costs incurred on appeal to the First Court of Appeals Houston, Texas are 

$556.60.

Court costs in this case have been taxed in this Court’s judgment

I, Christopher A. Prine, Clerk of the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, do hereby 

certify that this is a true statement of the costs of appeal in this case.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my 

hand and the seal of the Court of Appeals for the 

First District of Texas, this August 28, 2015.
Exhibit 32

                       SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION



The undersigned each certify that:

1.  They are the duly appointed Chief Executive Officer and Chief
    Financial Officer, respectively, of Northern Empire Bancshares, a
    California Corporation ("the Company"); and


2.  To their best knowledge and belief, the Company?s Quarterly Report on
    Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, and to which the
    Certification is attached as Exhibit 32, fully complies with the
    requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
    of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of Northern Empire Bancshares.


Date:  August 08, 2005



/s/ Deborah A. Meekins                      /s/ Jane M. Baker
----------------------                      -----------------
Deborah A. Meekins                          Jane M. Baker
President and Chief Executive Officer       Chief Financial Officer
## Summary Measures and Graphs

- Individual Provisions
- Trust Fund Investment in Equities

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						G1: Invest 40 percent of the OASI and DI Trust Fund reserves in equities (phased in 2024-2038), assuming an ultimate 5.8 percent annual real rate of return on equities.**

|  |  |
|--|--|
| *  A change in the investment of trust fund reserves to include some           equities affects the size of all summarized measures because increased           "present-value" discounting reduces the weight on values for more distant           future years.  As a result, the magnitude of the current-law actuarial           balance and the summarized effects of most proposals is reduced.  Therefore,           the size of the change in the long-range actuarial balance indicated here           cannot be interpreted directly as a reduction in the shortfall.  The actual           reduction in the shortfall from equity investment depends on the amount of           reserves that are available for investment throughout the period.  For example,           if provisions to change revenue or scheduled benefits resulted in a purely           pay-as-you-go system (reserves just above zero throughout the period), then           investment in equities would have no effect on the actuarial balance. |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACTAPPEALS Appeals of

-- URS Energy & Construction, Inc. Under Contract No. FA3002-06-D-OOO 1 APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCE FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA Nos. 61255, 61256, 61257

Nicole J. Owren-Wiest, Esq. Elizabeth A. Buehler, Esq.

Crowell & Moring LLP Washington, DC Arthur M. Taylor, Esq.

DCMA ChiefTrial Attorney Defense Contract ManagementAgency Chantilly, VA ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeals are dismissed with prejudice. Dated: March 15, 2019

rative Judge Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 61255, 61256, 61257, Appeals of URS Energy & Construction, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals 

# I
#### CORAL GABLES, INC., v. LAU RHEA WARD.

(Filed 10 April, 1935.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *Oglesby, J.,*at June Term, 1934, of Buree.

Civil action, *ex contractu,*tried upon the following issues:

“1. Did Coral Gables Corporation and the defendant Lau Rhea Ward, on 16 September, 1925, enter into a written contract whereby the said Coral Gables Corporation agreed to convey to the defendant Lau Rhea Ward certain land in Coral Gables, Florida, by good and sufficient warranty deed, free of all encumbrances other than such as may have been placed by the defendant Lau Rhea Ward, and whereby the defendant Lau Rhea Ward executed and delivered to the said Coral Gables Corporation, as the purchase price of said lands, her promissory note under seal in words and figures set forth in the complaint? Answer : 'Yes.’

“2. Was the said note, together with said land contract, assigned to the Coral Gables, Inc., for value prior to the institution of this action? Answer: ‘Yes/

“3. Was the defendant Lau Rhea Ward induced to enter into said contract for the purchase of said land and to execute and deliver said note to Coral Gables Corporation by the fraud of said Coral Gables Corporation and its agents, as alleged in the answer ? Answer: ‘Yes.’

“4. If so, is the right of the defendant Lau Rhea Ward to assert such fraud as a defense to said note and land contract barred by the statute *829of limitations prescribed by sec. 441 of tbe Consolidated Statutes, as alleged in tbe plaintiff’s reply? Answer: No.’

“5. Is tbe plaintiff Coral Gables, Inc., ready, able, and willing to convey to tbe defendant Lau Ebea Ward tbe land for wbicb said note was given by good and sufficient deed, free of all encumbrances other tban sucb as may bave been placed thereon by tbe defendant Lau Ebea Ward? Answer: No.’”

Judgment on tbe verdict, from wbicb tbe plaintiff appeals, assigning-errors.

*Isaac T, Ávcry and J. Bennett Ridctle, Jr., for plaintiff.*

*0. Lee Horton, S. J. Hrvin, and S. J. Ervin, Jr., for defendant.*

Per OtjeiaM.

On tbe bearing tbe controversy narrowed itself principally to issues of fact, wbicb tbe jury has determined in favor of tbe defendant. Tbe numerous exceptions noted during tbe trial bave been examined with care without discovering any reversible error or reason to disturb tbe result. Hence, tbe verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 237 (Monday, December 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 63521]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30021]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Security for the Protection of the Public Financial 
Responsibility to Meet Liability Incurred for Death or Injury to 
Passengers or Other Persons on Voyages; Notice of Issuance of 
Certificate (Casualty)

    Notice is hereby given that the following have been issued a 
Certificate of Financial Responsibility to Meet Liability Incurred for 
Death or Injury to Passengers or Other Persons on Voyages pursuant to 
the provisions of Section 2, Public Law 89-777 (46 U.S.C. 817(d)) and 
the Federal Maritime Commission's implementing regulations at 46 C.F.R. 
Part 540, as amended:

Star Clippers Ltd., Luxembourg Shipping Services S.A., Star Flyer 
N.V. and Star Clipper N.V., 4101 Salzedo Street, Coral Gables, 
Florida 33146

Vessel: STAR FLYER

    Dated: December 5, 1995.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-30021 Filed 12-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.52


March 31, 1997



Mr. Thomas F. Little
546 Gramercy Drive
Marietta, GA 30068

Dear Mr. Little:

Scientific Games Inc. (formerly known as Scientific Games Operating Corp. and
hereinafter referred to as the "Company") and Thomas F. Little (the
"Executive") are parties to that certain Employment Agreement dated as of
October 1, 1991, as amended by that certain letter agreement dated August 23,
1993 (collectively, the "Agreement"). Terms defined in the Agreement and not
otherwise defined herein, when used in this letter agreement, shall have the
respective meanings provided for in the Agreement. Anything in the Agreement to
the contrary notwithstanding, the Company and Executive hereby agree as follows:

1.   The Executive's annual base salary shall be $212,500 effective as of March
     31, 1997.

2.   The Term of Employment shall extend to and through September 30, 2000.

To acknowledge your agreement with the provisions of this letter, please sign a
counterpart of this letter in the space below and return it to me.

                                        Very truly yours,

                                        SCIENTIFIC GAMES INC.



                                        By: /s/ William G. Malloy
                                            ---------------------
                                            William G. Malloy
                                            President and Chief
                                            Executive Officer



Accepted and Agreed:



/s/ Thomas F. Little
--------------------
Thomas F. Little
EXHIBIT 31.2
                                  CERTIFICATION

         I, Alan Rubin, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Alec Bradley Cigar
Corporation;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

                  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
         caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this report is being prepared;

                  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
         controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
         about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
         of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
         evaluation; and

                  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
         internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
         registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal
         quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,
         or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting; and

         5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditor and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

                  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
         the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
         which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's
         ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
         and

                  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
         management or other employees who have a significant role in the
         registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 13, 2003

/s/ Alan Rubin
---------------------------
Alan Rubin
Principal Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0001058438
<NAME> CFS BANCORP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          14,586
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          17,484
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                10,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    217,708
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         443,149
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           450,789
<LOANS>                                        707,234
<ALLOWANCE>                                      5,252
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,445,835
<DEPOSITS>                                     970,155
<SHORT-TERM>                                   110,271
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             25,239
<LONG-TERM>                                     82,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           229
<OTHER-SE>                                     257,441
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,445,835
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 13,309
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               11,892
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   844
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                26,045
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              10,225
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,720
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           11,325
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,285
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               (112)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 18,366
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,427)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     (7,427)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,480)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.37
<LOANS-NON>                                      9,607
<LOANS-PAST>                                     9,607
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 1,220
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 10,687
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 4,045
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       86
<RECOVERIES>                                        83
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                5,252
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,285
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,285
        

</TABLE>