alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
10.8

    Irrevocable
Proxy

    


    The
undersigned holder (the "Holder") of 1,164,554
shares of common stock (the "Shares") of Pharma-Bio Serv, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), solely in
its capacity as a holder of securities of the Company, hereby irrevocably
appoints Elizabeth Plaza, as the sole and exclusive attorney and proxy of the
Holder, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, to vote and exercise
all voting, consent and similar rights with respect to all of the Holder's
Shares, until the Expiration Date (as defined below), on the terms and
conditions specified below.  Upon the Holder's execution of this
Irrevocable Proxy, any and all prior proxies given by the Holder with respect to
any of the Holder's Shares are hereby revoked and the Holder agrees not to grant
any subsequent proxies with respect to any of the Holder's Shares until after
the Expiration Date.

     

    This
Irrevocable Proxy is irrevocable, is coupled with an interest sufficient in law
to support an irrevocable power made for the benefit of third
parties.

     

    The term
of this Irrevocable Proxy shall commence on the date (the "Certification Date")
the Company obtains a National Minority Supplier Development Council
Minority-Controlled Certification with respect to 2009 ("Certification") and
shall terminate on the "Expiration
Date".  As used herein, the term "Expiration Date"
shall mean the first anniversary date of the Certification Date unless the
Certification expires sooner in which event the Expiration Date shall be the
date the Certification expires.

     

    The
attorney and proxy named above is hereby authorized and empowered by the Holder,
at any time prior to the Expiration Date, to act as the Holder's attorney and
proxy to vote the Holder's Shares, and to exercise all voting, consent and
similar rights of the Holder with respect to the Holder's Shares (including,
without limitation, the power to execute and deliver written consents) at every
annual, special or adjourned meeting of stockholders of the Company and in every
written consent in lieu of such meeting.

     

    Any
obligation hereunder of the Holder shall be binding upon the successors and
assigns of the Holder.  This Irrevocable Proxy shall terminate, and be
of no further force or effect, automatically upon the Expiration
Date.

     

    IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Holder has caused this Irrevocable Proxy to be
executed as of July 15, 2009.

     

    	 
      	
            Holder:

          
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
            Name:  Krovim
      LLC

          
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
            By:

          	
            /s/ Dov
  Perlysky

          
	 
      	 
      	
            Name:

          	
                  
              Dov
Perlysky

            

          
	 
      	 
      	
            Title:

          	
                  
              Managing
      Member Nesher LLC, Manager
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           8,662
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,980
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                11,410
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     32,576
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           6,984
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             7,121
<LOANS>                                        177,346
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,488
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 253,237
<DEPOSITS>                                     224,872
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,864
<LONG-TERM>                                      2,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,898
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,605
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 253,237
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 10,699
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,431
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   517
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                13,647
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,724
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,724
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,923
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      490
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  81
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,342
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,330
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,939
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,939
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.69
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.00
<LOANS-NON>                                        292
<LOANS-PAST>                                       734
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,129
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      202
<RECOVERIES>                                        71
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,488
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,488
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 27 (Thursday, February 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7792]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3250]



[[Page 7792]]

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION

[Finance Docket No. 32636]


Baltimore and Annapolis Railroad Company--Acquisition and 
Operation Exemption--Mid Atlantic Railroad Co., Inc.

    Baltimore and Annapolis Railroad Company (B&A), a non-operating 
entity,<SUP>1 has filed a notice of exemption to acquire and operate 
approximately 75.9 miles of rail line from Mid Atlantic Railroad Co., 
Inc. The lines extend: (1) From Mullins, SC (milepost AL 326.0) to 
Whiteville, NC (milepost AC 289.0); and (2) from Chadbourn, NC 
(milepost ACH 297.2) to Conway, SC (milepost ACH 336.1). B&A states 
that the acquired property will be operated by a division of B&A. 
Consummation was scheduled to take place on or before January 15, 1995.

    \1\ On January 11, 1973, B&A filed an application in Docket No. 
AB-71 requesting permission to abandon operations over its entire 
line of track of 21.1 miles, extending from Clifford Junction in 
Baltimore City, MD, to the City of Annapolis, MD. In Baltimore and 
Annapolis R. Co. Abandonment, 348 I.C.C. 678 (1976), B&A was 
permitted to abandon operations over a portion of its line of 
railroad between Glen Burnie, MD, and Annapolis (approximately 15 
miles).
    On September 29, 1989, the Maryland Mass Transit Administration 
filed a notice of intent in Docket No. AB-71 (Sub-No. 2) (request 
for involuntary abandonment authority) to abandon the remaining 
portion of B&A's trackage between Clifford Junction and Glen Burnie 
(approximately 5.78 miles), for the purpose of constructing and 
operating a regional light rail transit system. B&A adds that in May 
1991, the State took its right-of-way through a condemnation 
proceeding and constructed a passenger line (Central Light Rail 
Transit Line). As such, B&A presently holds no authority from the 
Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any comments must be filed with the Commission and served on: 
Kenneth Pippin, 100 West Maple Road, Linthicum, MD 21090.
    This notice is filed under 49 CFR 1150.31. If the notice contains 
false or misleading information, the exemption is void ab initio. 
Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10505(d) may be filed 
at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically 
stay the transaction.

    Decided: February 2, 1995.

    By the Commission, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-3250 Filed 2-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7035-01-P
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 1.13 0.77 31% 18%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

September 15, 2023

Category of Change: Coverage of Employment or Earnings, or Inclusion of Other Sources of Revenue

Summary Measures and Graphs

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: F3. Expand covered earnings to include employer and employee premiums for 

employer-sponsored group health insurance (ESI). Starting in 2027, phase out the OASDI payroll tax 

exclusion for ESI premiums. Set an exclusion level at the 75th percentile of premium distribution in 2027, 

with amounts above that subject to the payroll tax. Reduce the exclusion level each year by 10 percent of 

the 2027 exclusion level until fully eliminated in 2037.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

22.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 239 (Wednesday, December 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 64070]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30423]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[CA-063-1150-00]


Public Workshops for the Northern & Eastern Colorado Desert 
Coordinated Management Plan

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, in accordance with Public Laws 92-463 
and 94-579, that a series of multi-agency meetings have been scheduled 
to update the public on the status of the Northern and Eastern Colorado 
Desert Coordinated Management Plan. The agencies urge interested 
individuals and organizations to attend these workshops to review 
progress and offer specific suggestions on the preparation of the draft 
plan. The following public workshops are scheduled:

Monday, January 8, 7-10 p.m., BLM Riverside District Office, 6221 Box 
Springs Boulevard, Riverside, CA
Tuesday, January 9, 7-10 p.m., Holiday Inn, 2640 Lakewood Boulevard, 
Long Beach, CA
Wednesday, January 10, 7-10 p.m., Joshua Tree National Park, Park 
Headquarters, 54485 Joshua Tree National Park, Twentynine Palms, CA
Thursday, January 11, 7-10 p.m., BLM Palm Springs Resource Area, 630500 
Garnet Avenue, Palm Springs, CA
Tuesday, January 16, 7-10 p.m., BLM Needles Resource Area Office, 101 
W. Spike's Road, Needles, CA
Wednesday, January 17, 7-10 p.m., Blythe City Council Chambers, 220 
North Spring Street, Blythe, CA
Thursday, January 18, 7-10 p.m., Imperial Irrigation District, 1285 
Broadway, El Centro, CA
Monday, January 22, 7-10 p.m., U.S. Forest Service, Cleveland National 
Forest, 10875 Rancho Bernardo Road, Suite 200, Rancho Bernardo, CA

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The purpose of the meetings includes: updating 
the public on the status of the Plan, including the scope and 
summarized issues that will guide decision making; invite public 
inspection of some of the information collected on resources and uses 
that will be used in analyzing values and conflicts and in making 
decisions focusing on wildlife habitats and the vehicle routes of 
travel inventories; gathering public comment about the plan's direction 
and process to date, the information that has been gathered; and 
advising the public about how to review and study the information 
gathered and obtain copies of some of the data to be better prepared to 
review and comment on the draft plan when it is issued.
    The Bureau of Land Management is the lead agency and cooperating 
agencies are: National Park Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, 
National Biological Service, Marine Corps Air Station, Yuma; and the 
California Department of Fish and Game.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION AND MEETING CONFIRMATION: Contact the Bureau of 
Land Management, California Desert District, External Affairs Office, 
6221 Box Springs Boulevard, Riverside, California 92507; (909) 697-
5215.

    Dated: November 29, 1995.
Jo Simpson,
Acting, District Manager.
[FR Doc. 95-30423 Filed 12-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-M
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
333-56979, 333-07391, 333-18563 and 333-28789 of Fisher Scientific International
Inc. on Forms S-8 of our report dated January 28, 2003 (February 14, 2003 as to
Note 23)(which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an
explanatory paragraph relating to a change in method of accounting for goodwill
and intangible assets), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Fisher
Scientific International Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

New York, New York
March 17, 2003
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas May 28, 2021 No. 04-21-00095-CV MEAT SUPPLY, LLC , Appellant
v. 510 GOOD LATIMER, LLC ,

Appellee From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020-CI-11151 Honorable Angelica Jimenez, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R Appellant’s second motion for an extension of time to file its brief is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is due on or before June 28, 2021 ; however, no further extensions will be granted absent extenuating circumstances.

_________________________________ Irene Rios, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 28th day of May, 2021.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
#### John Flynn and others, Commissioners, v. Albert J. Hurd, Commissoner. John Flynn v. Thomas F. Cornell, Commissioner.

Motion for liberty to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted in each case.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 134342 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 134342 

 COA: 278324 
 Wayne CC: 01-012200-01

ERNEST L. GREEN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 15, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion 

for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G). 

d1022 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 29, 2007 

 Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-30533

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ROBERT MARCUS MONTES, also known as Mook,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 5:16-CR-226-1

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Robert Marcos Montes appeals following his conviction and sentence for 

conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine. He argues that he was denied his 

Sixth Amendment right to counsel when prior counsel effectively abandoned 

him at a hearing for a motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Montes further 

contends that the district court failed to conduct the required inquiry under 

Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975), prior to his self-representation.

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 23, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-30533 Document: 00514399631 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/23/2018
No. 17-30533

2

A defendant can be constructively denied counsel if (1) counsel is 

prevented from assisting the defendant at a critical stage, (2) counsel “entirely 

fails to subject the prosecution’s case to meaningful adversarial testing,” or (3) 

counsel “actively represented conflicting interests.” See United States v. 

Cronic, 466 U.S. 648, 659-61 & nn. 25, 28 (1984) (internal quotation marks and 

citation omitted). To the extent that Montes’s initial brief asserts a conflict of 

interest theory, he has not specified what interest counsel allegedly 

maintained that conflicted with his duties to his client. See Bostick v. 

Quarterman, 580 F.3d 303, 306 (5th Cir. 2009). To the extent Montes argues 

that counsel’s alleged failure to argue the motion is a failure to present 

meaningful adversarial advocacy, counsel’s conduct at the hearing does not 

constitute a complete abandonment. See Bell v. Cone, 535 U.S. 685, 695 (2002). 

Specifically, counsel was present during the entire hearing, conferred privately 

with Montes on various occasions, explained Montes’s desire to bring the 

motion, and spoke on behalf of Montes at times. Therefore, we reject Montes’s 

claim that counsel abandoned him, without prejudice to any ineffective 

assistance claim he may choose to raise on collateral review. See United States 

v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

Montes’s claim that the district court improperly denied him a Faretta 

hearing likewise is unavailing. As explained, he was not completely 

abandoned by counsel. Moreover, he never unequivocally invoked his right to 

self-representation. United States v. Cano, 519 F.3d 512, 516 (5th Cir. 2008).

For these reasons, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 

 Case: 17-30533 Document: 00514399631 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/23/2018
### Proposed Provision: B3.10. Beginning with those newly eligible for OASDI benefits in 2030, gradually increase the first PIA bend point in each year so that it is 15 percent higher for those newly eligible in 2044 and later.
EXHIBIT 21





As of August 25, 2004, SBS Technologies, Inc. has the following
subsidiaries:



|Name of Subsidiary                                          | State of Incorporation
|----------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------
|                                                            |                       
|SBS Technologies, Inc., Government Group                    | New Mexico            
|SBS Technologies, Inc., Commercial Group                    | Minnesota             
|SBS Technologies, Inc., Communications and Enterprise
Group | California            
|SBS Technologies, Inc. Foreign Holding Company              | Nevada                
|SBS Technologies, Inc., German Holdings, LLC                | Delaware              
|SBS Technologies, GmbH & Co. KG (1)                         | Germany               
|ortec Electronic Assembly GmbH (2)                          | Germany               
|SBS or Computers Verwaltungs GmbH (1)                       | Germany               
|SBS Technologies (Canada), Inc. (3)                         | Canada                
|SBS Technologies Finance LP (3)                             | Canada                
|SBS Technologies (Shenzhen) Limited (3)                     | China                 
|                                                            |                       

|(1) 	A subsidiary of SBS Technologies, Inc., German Holdings,
LLC 
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) 	A subsidiary of SBS Technologies, GmbH & Co.
KG              
|(3)	A subsidiary of SBS Technologies, Inc. Foreign Holding
Company
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3556 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3556

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to modify certain regulations 
 relating to the requirements for commercial driver's license testing 
    and commercial learner's permit holders, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 2, 2022

 Ms. Lummis (for herself and Mr. Kelly) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of Transportation to modify certain regulations 
 relating to the requirements for commercial driver's license testing 
    and commercial learner's permit holders, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Licensing Individual Commercial 
Exam-takers Now Safely and Efficiently Act of 2022'' or the ``LICENSE 
Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATIONS TO CERTAIN COMMERCIAL DRIVER'S LICENSE 
              REGULATIONS.

    Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Secretary of Transportation, acting through the Administrator of the 
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, shall--
            (1) revise section 384.228 of title 49, Code of Federal 
        Regulations (or a successor regulation), to allow a State or 
        third-party examiner to administer a commercial driver's 
        license knowledge test only if the examiner--
                    (A) maintains a valid commercial driver's license 
                test examiner certification;
                    (B) completes a commercial driver's license skills 
                test examiner training course that meets the 
                requirements of subsection (d) of that section; and
                    (C) completes 1 unit of instruction described in 
                subsection (c)(3) of that section;
            (2) revise section 383.25(a)(1) of title 49, Code of 
        Federal Regulations (or a successor regulation), to allow a 
        commercial driver's license holder accompanying a commercial 
        learner's permit holder to be present anywhere in the cab of 
        the vehicle being operated by the commercial learner's permit 
        holder; and
            (3) revise section 383.79 of title 49, Code of Federal 
        Regulations (or a successor regulation), to allow a State to 
        administer a driving skills test to any commercial driver's 
        license applicant, regardless of the State of domicile of the 
        applicant or where the applicant received driver training.
                                 <all>
```