alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                               VERTEL CORPORATION
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


                                                      Other Name(s)
                                 Jurisdiction        Under Which the
                                     of              Subsidiary Does
Name of Subsidiary              Incorporation           Business
-----------------------         -------------     --------------------

   Vertel Pacific               California        Vertel Asia Pacific,
                                                  Vertel Korea
                                                  Vertel Japan

   Vertel B.V.                  Netherlands       Retix Ireland, Vertel Ireland,
                                                     Vertel France, Vertel
                                                     Germany, Vertel U.K.
                                                     Retix B.V.

   Vertel U.K. Limited          United Kingdom    Retix Property Company, Ltd.

   Vertel Germany GmbH          Germany           Retix (Deutschland) GmbH

   Vertel Poland Sp. z o.o      Poland            None

   Recodif Retix France (TM)    France            None
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6504
LACY HUGHES JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SARGEANT SHREVE, Correctional Officer, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (CA-03-202-2) Submitted: May 15, 2003 Decided: May 29, 2003 Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lacy Hughes Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Lacy Hughes Johnson appeals the district court’s order and judgment dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) (2000) his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Johnson v. Shreve , No. CA-03-202-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 18, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We have issued our report dated June 30, 2008 accompanying the consolidated financial statements of Unify Corporation on Form 10-K for the years ended April 30, 2008, 2007, and 2006.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Unify Corporation on Forms S-2 (File No. 333-117628, effective July 23, 2004 and File No. 333-124488, effective August 23, 2005) and on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-13203, effective October 1, 1996, File No. 333-61705, effective August 18, 1998, File No. 333-92973, effective December 17, 1999, File No. 333-71814, effective October 18, 2001, File No. 333-98633, effective August 23, 2002, File No. 333-120750, effective November 24, 2004 and File No. 333-149905, effective March 26, 2008).

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLPReno,
NevadaJune 30, 2008

---
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF 'I'- 
Honorable Ii. A. CUea, Page B 

You are thintore edtls~d that, by euthority oi 

the Stats Boar4 of XJduoatlon, thsro amy be ozpan4.4 orrt af 

the appro,&.atlan of the balanas in the t&ate Toxtbmk nutd 

ruoh sum o? money for irdght 011 use4 textbook8 ln a&dltion to Chat opea?fioatlp provided bJr tho Legi&urw, em 

imy to tha Stata Boa-4 aT Iliduoatlm appear to be a~o*ioary 

for that pur300th 

Yourn ralty’tmll?
## Social Security Number Holders

- Popular Baby Names
- Background information

Our popular name data come from applications for Social Security cards.   The graph below shows the number of applicants for a Social Security card by   year of birth and sex. The number of such applicants is restricted to U. S. births where    the year of birth, sex, State of birth (50 States and District of Columbia)    are known, and where the given name is at least 2 characters long.   
   Although today nearly everyone in the United States has a Social Security card,   that was not the case in the early years of the Social Security program.     Some people born before 1937 never obtained a Social Security card because their   employment was not covered under Social Security or they died before it became covered.   Even in more recent years,    many of those who died before entering the covered work force never obtained a    Social Security card. However, when the Internal Revenue Service began to require    a dependent child's Social Security Number on Federal income tax returns (see    Tax Reform Act of 1986),    such deaths were no longer a significant factor.    

Data for the graph at right were tabulated in March 2024.   To see the data underlying the graph, click on the graph.

Note: the graph does *not* represent the total number of U. S. births. See information above the graph.
Footer menu
#### Simon Mather, as Executor, Respondent, and another, v. Gilbert E. Parsons, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
| Date:                  June 12, 2006 | /s/                  Federico Sada                  González                                       |
|--------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 | Name: Federico                  Sada González                                                                                                                       |
|                                 | Title:                    President                  and Chief                             Executive Officer |

|   | /s/                  Claudio del Valle                  Cabello                        |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name: Claudio                  del Valle Cabello                                                                                              |
|   | Title:                    Chief                  Administrative                          Officer |

|   | /s/                  Álvaro Rodríguez                  Arregui            |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name: Álvaro                  Rodríguez Arregui                                                                             |
|   | Title:                    Chief                  Financial                  Officer                                              |
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-15-00198-CV

IN RE David B.T. MYRICK Jr.

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 3, 2015

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On April 2, 2015, relator David B.T. Myrick Jr. filed a petition for writ of mandamus

complaining of the trial court’s order granting a motion to transfer venue in the underlying civil 

action. The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus, the response filed on 

behalf of the real party in interest and relator’s reply and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled 

to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 14847B, styled Janice Moody v. Linda Moody, Elizabeth Moody, W.L. 

Moody V, Edna M. Archer, David B.T. Myrick, Kathryn K. Pacheco, and Haden M. Beardsley, pending in the 198th 

Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas, the Honorable M. Rex Emerson, presiding.
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATE OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPursuant to Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code

The
undersigned, being the Principal Financial Officer of Enbridge Energy Management, L.L.C., the delegate of the general partner of Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P. (the "Partnership"), hereby
certifies that the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated
March 28, 2003

|                                                                                     |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 
|/s/ MARK A. MAKIMark A. Maki
Vice President, Finance and
Principal Financial Officer |  | 

---

QuickLinks
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 246 (Friday, December 22, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 66551]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31148]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Durden Bankshares, Inc., et al.; Formations of; Acquisitions by; 
and Mergers of Bank Holding Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied for the Board's 
approval under section 3 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 
1842) and Sec.  225.14 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.14) to 
become a bank holding company or to acquire a bank or bank holding 
company. The factors that are considered in acting on the applications 
are set forth in section 3(c) of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Each application is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank or to the offices of the Board of 
Governors. Any comment on an application that requests a hearing must 
include a statement of why a written presentation would not suffice in 
lieu of a hearing, identifying specifically any questions of fact that 
are in dispute and summarizing the evidence that would be presented at 
a hearing.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received not later than January 19, 1996.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Zane R. Kelley, Vice President) 
104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303:
    1. Durden Bankshares, Inc., Twin City, Georgia; to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Durden 
Banking Company, Inc., Twin City, Georgia.
    2. First Commerce Corporation, New Orleans, Louisiana; to acquire 
13.51 percent of the voting shares of Louisiana Independent Bankshares, 
Inc., Baton Rouge, Louisiana, and thereby indirectly acquire First 
National Bankers Bank, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 18, 
1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-31148 Filed 12-21-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
```
Exhibit 10.1


 


AMENDMENT TO THE


CHECKPOINT THERAPEUTICS, INC.


AMENDED AND RESTATED 2015 INCENTIVE PLAN


 


This Amendment to the Checkpoint Therapeutics,
Inc. Amended and Restated 2015 Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), is hereby adopted, effective as of the date indicated below.


 


WITNESETH:


 


WHEREAS, Checkpoint Therapeutics, Inc.
(the “Corporation”) maintains the Plan, and the Plan is currently in effect; and


 


WHEREAS, Section 16.1 of the Plan authorizes
the Board or the Committee (as defined in the Plan) to amend the Plan, subject to certain limitations, including stockholder approval
for certain amendments; and


 


WHEREAS, the Board has approved and authorized
this Amendment to the Plan and has recommended that the stockholders of the Corporation approve this Amendment;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the
Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective as of December 6, 2022:


 


1. Section 5.1. of the Plan
is hereby amended by increasing the share references in such section from 900,000 to 3,000,000, so that such section reads in its entirety
as follows:


 


“5.1. NUMBER OF SHARES. Subject
to adjustment as provided in Sections 5.2 and Section 15.1, the aggregate number of Shares reserved and available for issuance pursuant
to Awards granted under the Plan shall be 3,000,000. The maximum number of Shares that may be issued upon exercise of Incentive Stock
Options granted under the Plan shall be 3,000,000.”


 


2. Except as specifically
set forth herein, the terms of the Plan shall be and remain unchanged, and the Plan as amended shall remain in full force and effect.


 


The foregoing is hereby acknowledged as being
the Amendment to the Checkpoint Therapeutics, Inc. Amended and Restated 2015 Incentive Plan, as adopted by the Board on November 3, 2022,
and approved by the Corporation’s stockholders on November 3, 2022.


 


	CHECKPOINT THERAPEUTICS, INC.	 
	 	 
	By:	/s/ James F. Oliviero	 
	 	James F. Oliviero, President and CEO
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Perfumania Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the year ended January 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael W. Katz, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ MICHAEL W. KATZMichael W. KatzPresident andChief Executive OfficerJuly 2, 2009
EXHIBIT 32.2

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO\
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Online Vacation Center Holdings Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Edward B. Rudner, Principal Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: November 13, 2007


/s/ Edward B. Rudner
--------------------
Edward B. Rudner
Principal Financial Officer































                                       28
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 331 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 331

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the age 
  requirement with respect to eligibility for qualified ABLE programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 22, 2021

   Mr. Casey (for himself, Mr. Moran, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. 
 Boozman, Mr. Blumenthal, and Ms. Murkowski) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the age 
  requirement with respect to eligibility for qualified ABLE programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``ABLE Age Adjustment Act''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF AGE REQUIREMENT FOR QUALIFIED ABLE PROGRAMS.

    (a) In General.--Section 529A(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by striking ``age 26'' each place it appears in 
paragraphs (1)(A) and (2)(A)(i)(II) and inserting ``age 46''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 239 (Wednesday, December 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 64039]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30345]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. ER95-1359-000]


Amoco Power Marketing Corp; Notice of Issuance of Order

December 8, 1955.
    On July 11, 1995, as amended September 14, 1995 and October 27, 
1995, Amoco Power Marketing Corporation (Amoco Power) submitted for 
filing a rate schedule under which Amoco Power will engage in wholesale 
electric power and energy transactions as a marketer. Amoco Power also 
requested waiver of various Commission regulations. In particular, 
Amoco Power requested that the Commission grant blanket approval under 
18 CFR Part 34 of all future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability by Amoco Power.
    On November 29, 1995, pursuant to delegated authority, the 
Director, Division of Applications, Office of Electric Power 
Regulation, granted requests for blanket approval under Part 34, 
subject to the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Amoco Power should file a motion to 
intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 
211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.211 and 385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, Amoco Power is 
authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as 
a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect or any security 
of another person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for 
some lawful object within the corporate purposes of the applicant, and 
compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or 
appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Amoco Power's issuances of securities or 
assumptions of liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is December 29, 1995.
    Copies of the full text of the order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E. 
Washington, D.C. 20426.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-30345 Filed 12-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>


                                    AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this "Amendment") dated this 13th of
December, 1996, by and between TREMONT ADVISERS, INC., a Delaware corporation
having its principal executive offices at Corporate Center at Rye, 555 Theodore
Fremd Avenue, Rye, New York ("Tremont"); and ROBERT I. SCHULMAN, an individual
residing at 18 Green Valley Road, Armonk, New York ("Executive").

                                   WITNESSETH:

         WHEREAS, Executive is employed by Tremont pursuant to and in accordance
with the terms and conditions contained in an employment agreement dated April
22, 1994 (the "Employment Agreement"), by and between Tremont and Executive; and

         WHEREAS, Executive and Tremont are each desirous of amending the
Employment Agreement in accordance with this Amendment, effective January 1,
1997.

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual covenants,
terms and conditions hereinafter set forth and in the Employment Agreement, the
parties hereto hereby agree as follows:

1.       Section 3(a)(i) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by 
deleting the following phrase:  "two hundred twenty-five thousand dollars 
($225,000)" and inserting in its place "three hundred twenty-six thousand
dollars ($326,000)."

2.       Section 5 shall be amended by deleting all references therein to 
"December 31, 1996" and inserting in its place "December 31, 1997."

3.       Except to the extent amended by this Amendment, the terms and 
conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
In the event of any conflict between the terms of the Employment Agreement and 
the Amendment, the Amendment shall control.

4.       Each party hereby represents and warrants to the other that each has 
read the foregoing provisions and that each has had a sufficient opportunity to 
discuss this Amendment with anyone each party might desire prior to signing 
below. Further, in signing this Amendment, each party has not relied on or been
induced to execute this Amendment by any statements, representations, agreements
or promises, oral or written, made by the other except for those expressly
contained in this Amendment.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed and delivered by
the parties hereto as of the date first above written.

WITNESS


/s/ Suzanne S. Hammond                       By: /s/ Robert I. Schulman
------------------------------                  -------------------------------
Suzanne S. Hammond                               Robert I. Schulman
Secretary and Treasurer

ATTEST                                       TREMONT ADVISERS, INC.


/s/ Stephen T. Clayton                           /s/ Sandra L. Manzke
------------------------------                  -------------------------------
Stephen T. Clayton                               Sandra L. Manzke
Chief Financial Officer                          Chief Executive Officer