alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w2






EXHIBIT
10.2


AMENDMENT TO




R.H. DONNELLEY CORPORATION




SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT AGREEMENT




     WHEREAS, R.H. Donnelley Corporation (the “Company”) and David C. Swanson, the
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company (the “Executive”), entered into a Supplemental
Executive Retirement Agreement, effective December 31, 2008 (the “Agreement”); and



     WHEREAS, in consideration of the Executive’s continued services to the Company, the Executive
and the Company desire to amend the Agreement in certain respects.



     NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the power of amendment contained in Section 7.15 of the Agreement,
the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors and the Executive hereby amend the
Agreement by mutual assent, effective April 21, 2009, in the following respects:



     1. Section 2.6 of the Agreement is hereby amended by inserting the following new sentence at
the end thereof:




Notwithstanding the foregoing, any transaction described in this Section
2.6 shall not constitute a “Change in Control” if such transaction is
consummated pursuant to or during the course of a Restructuring.



     2. Section 2.19 of the Agreement is hereby amended by replacing the words “Five Hundred
Thousand Dollars ($500,000)” with the words “One Million Dollars ($1,000,000)” appearing therein.



     3. Section 2.20 of the Agreement is hereby amended by inserting the following new sentence at
the end thereof:




Notwithstanding the foregoing, any transaction described in this Section
2.20 shall not constitute an “Unapproved Change in Significant Control” if
such transaction is consummated pursuant to or during the course of a
Restructuring.



     4. Article II of the Agreement is hereby amended by inserting the following new definition at
the end thereof:




     2.22 “Restructuring” means the restructuring, reorganization
and/or recapitalization of all or a significant portion of the Company’s
outstanding indebtedness (including bank debt, inclusive of letters of
credit, bond debt, and other on and off
balance sheet indebtedness, trade claims, leases (both on and off balance
sheet) and other litigation-related



 









 







claims and obligations, unfunded
pension and retiree medical liabilities, or other liabilities.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Amendment to the Agreement as of April
21, 2009.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	R.H. DONNELLEY CORPORATION

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Gretchen Zech
 	 
	 	 	Gretchen Zech 	 
	 	 	SVP, Human Resources 	 
	 
	 	EXECUTIVE

 	 
	 	/s/ David C. Swanson
 	 
	 	David C. Swanson
II 

Calendar No. 364 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3499 

[Report No. 117–107] 

To amend the Post-Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act of 2006 

to repeal certain obsolete requirements, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 13 (legislative day, JANUARY 10), 2022 

Mr. PETERS (for himself and Mr. PORTMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

MAY 9, 2022 

Reported by Mr. PETERS, without amendment 

A BILL 

To amend the Post-Katrina Emergency Management Reform 

Act of 2006 to repeal certain obsolete requirements, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3499 RS

1 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF OBSOLETE DHS CONTRACTING RE2 QUIREMENTS. 

3 The Post-Katrina Emergency Management Reform 

4 Act of 2006 (Public Law 109–295; 120 Stat. 1394) is 

5 amended by striking section 692 (6 U.S.C. 792). 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 364 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3499 

[Report No. 117–107] 

A BILL 

To amend the Post-Katrina Emergency Managelete requirements, and for other purposes. ment Reform Act of 2006 to repeal certain obsoMAY 9, 2022 

Reported without amendment 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 10.10


                                PROMISSORY NOTE


Dallas, Texas                     $15,000,000.00                March 12, 1998

     CompUSA Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Borrower"), for value 
received, promises to pay to the order of THE BANK OF NEW YORK ("Lender"), at 
the principal office of NationsBank of Texas, N.A., in lawful money of the 
United States of America, the principal sum of FIFTEEN MILLION AND NO/100 
DOLLARS ($15,000,000.00), or such lesser sum as shall be due and payable from 
time to time hereunder, as hereinafter provided.  All terms used but not 
defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Credit Agreement 
described below.

     Principal of and interest on the unpaid principal balance of Advances 
under this Note from time to time outstanding shall be due and payable as set 
forth in the Credit Agreement.

     This Note is issued pursuant to and evidences Advances under a Second 
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of March 12, 1998, among the 
Borrower, NationsBank of Texas, N.A., as Administrative Lender, certain 
Co-Agents and the lenders parties thereto (as amended, restated, 
supplemented, renewed, extended or otherwise modified from time to time, 
"Credit Agreement"), to which reference is made for a statement of the rights 
and obligations of the Lender and the duties and obligations of the Borrower 
in relation thereto; but neither this reference to the Credit Agreement nor 
any provision thereof shall affect or impair the absolute and unconditional 
obligation of the Borrower to pay the principal sum of and interest on this 
Note when due.

     The Borrower and all endorsers, sureties and guarantors of this Note 
(without waiving any notice that any Lender is specifically required to give 
pursuant to SECTION 8.1 of the Credit Agreement) hereby severally waive 
demand, presentment for payment, protest, notice of protest, notice of 
intention to accelerate the maturity of this Note, notice of acceleration of 
this Note, diligence in collecting, the bringing of any suit against any 
party and any notice of or defense on account of any extensions, renewals, 
partial payments or changes in any manner of or in this Note or in any of its 
terms, provisions and covenants, or any releases or substitutions of any 
security, or any delay, indulgence or other act of any trustee or any holder 
hereof, whether before or after maturity.

     THIS NOTE, TOGETHER WITH THE OTHER LOAN DOCUMENTS, REPRESENTS THE FINAL 
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PARTIES AND MAY NOT 

<PAGE>

BE CONTRADICTED BY EVIDENCE OF PRIOR, CONTEMPORANEOUS, OR SUBSEQUENT ORAL 
AGREEMENTS OF THE PARTIES HERETO.  THERE ARE NO UNWRITTEN ORAL AGREEMENTS 
BETWEEN THE PARTIES.

                                       CompUSA Inc.



                                       By:  /s/  Robert Gary
                                          -------------------------------
                                          Name:  Robert Gary
                                          Title:  Vice President-Finance




                                       -2-
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3559 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prohibit institutions of 

higher education participating in Federal student assistance programs 

from giving preferential treatment in the admissions process to legacy 

students or donors. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2022 

Mr. MERKLEY (for himself and Mr. CASEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prohibit 

institutions of higher education participating in Federal 

student assistance programs from giving preferential 

treatment in the admissions process to legacy students 

or donors. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fair College Admis5 sions for Students Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3559 IS

1 SEC. 2. BAN ON LEGACY OR DONOR PREFERENCES IN AD2 MISSIONS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 487(a) of the Higher 

4 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1094(a)) is amended 

5 by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(30)(A) The institution will not provide any 

7 manner of preferential treatment in the admission 

8 process to applicants on the basis of their relation9 ships to— 

10 ‘‘(i) donors to the institution; or 

11 ‘‘(ii) except as provided in subparagraph 

12 (B), alumni of the institution. 

13 ‘‘(B) The Secretary may waive the limitation 

14 described in subparagraph (A)(ii) for an award year 

15 for an eligible institution described in section 371(a) 

16 if such institution demonstrates to the satisfaction of 

17 the Secretary that preferential treatment in the ad18 mission process to applicants on the basis of their 

19 relationships to alumni of the institution is in the 

20 best interest of students who have been historically 

21 underrepresented in higher education.’’. 

22 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

23 subsection (a) shall take effect on the first day of the sec24 ond award year (as defined in section 481(a) of the Higher 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3559 IS

1 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1088(a))) that begins 

2 after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>



                                                                      Exhibit 27
<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
condensed consolidated balance sheet and the condensed consolidated statement of
operations of DTI Holdings,  Inc. filed as part of the quarterly  report on Form
10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such  quarterly  report on
Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                Jun-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                    Jul-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                     Mar-31-2000
<CASH>                            47,523,536
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                        556,814
<ALLOWANCES>                         139,625
<INVENTORY>                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  55,950,634
<PP&E>                           325,786,797
<DEPRECIATION>                    18,133,302
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   378,153,502
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             25,248,353
<BONDS>                          345,594,383
<PREFERRED>                              300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<COMMON>                             300,000
<OTHER-SE>                       (32,906,602)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     378,153,502
<SALES>                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   6,512,526
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     23,035,244
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               (27,311,097)
[INTEREST-INCOME]                  3,343,910
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (40,489,905)
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (40,489,905)
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                     (40,489,905)
<EPS-BASIC>                              0
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1 -- CERTIFICATION

         I, Alan Rubin, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Alec Bradley Cigar
Corporation;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

                  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
         caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this report is being prepared;

                  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
         controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
         about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
         of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
         evaluation; and

                  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
         internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
         registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal
         quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,
         or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting; and

         5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditor and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

                  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
         the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
         which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's
         ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
         and

                  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
         management or other employees who have a significant role in the
         registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 10, 2005

/s/ Alan Rubin
--------------
Alan Rubin
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18
                           OF THE UNITED STATES CODE,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of YSEEK,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10QSB for the  period  ending  June 30,  2002 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Bruce Hammil , Chief
Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to the 18 U.S.C.  section
350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13 (a) or
          15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

/s/Bruce Hammil
Bruce Hammil
Chief Executive Officer
August 13, 2002
#### ISAIAH GREEN et al. v. F. L. GLADSTONE, Trustee, et al.

(Filed 18 February, 1931.)

Appeal and Error E h — Where parties agree that issue of indebtedness should be answered in certain sum question of usury becomes academic.

In an action to restrain the foreclosure of a mortgage on lands wherein, on the trial, it is admitted that the issue as to the amount of plaintiff’s indebtedness should be answered in a certain amount, the question as to whether the plaintiff is entitled to a credit on the note for usurious charges becomes academic, and will not be decided on appeal.

Appeal by plaintiffs from *Moore, Special Judge,*at November Civil Term, 1930, of Maetin.

*348Civil action to restrain the foreclosure of a mortgage and to have the debt secured thereby credited with a forfeiture of the entire interest charged and twice the amount of usurious interest paid thereon.

On the hearing, the plaintiffs agreed that the issue of indebtedness “might be answered in the sum of $384 with interest from 26 January, 1929,” which was done. Upon this admission, the court directed a verdict accordingly, dissolved the temporary restraining order, and dismissed the claim for forfeiture of interest and penalty for usury. Plaintiffs appeal, assigning errors.

*A. R. Dunning for plaintiffs.*

*Wheeler Martin and B. A. Qritcher for defendants.*

Stacy, C. J.

The admission of the plaintiffs that the issue of indebtedness might be answered in the sum of $384 with interest from 26 January, 1929, which was done, brings the case under the decisions in *Waters v. Garris,*188 N. C., 305, 124 S. E., 334, and *Miller v. Dunn,*188 N. C., 397, 124 S. E., 746, and renders the questions relative to forfeiture of interest and penalty for usury, debated on brief, academic, at least so far as the present record is concerned.

No error.
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the report on Form 10-Q of New South Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William T. Ratliff, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/    WILLIAM T.
RATLIFF, III                                                         
|William T. Ratliff, III Chief Executive Officer New South Bancshares, Inc. May 14,
2003



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to New South Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by New South Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3370 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3370

 To release the reversionary interest of the United States in certain 
   non-Federal land in Salt Lake City, Utah, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 9, 2021

  Mr. Lee (for himself and Mr. Romney) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To release the reversionary interest of the United States in certain 
   non-Federal land in Salt Lake City, Utah, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``University of Utah Research Park 
Act''.

SEC. 2. RELEASE OF REVERSIONARY INTEREST OF THE UNITED STATES IN NON-
              FEDERAL LAND IN SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH.

    (a) Release.--There is released to the University of Utah, without 
consideration, the reversionary interest of the United States in the 
non-Federal land described in subsection (b).
    (b) Description of Non-Federal Land.--The non-Federal land referred 
to in subsection (a) is the approximately 593 acres of land of the 
University of Utah--
            (1) identified in the patent--
                    (A) numbered 43-99-0012; and
                    (B) dated October 18, 1968; and
            (2) more particularly described as tracts D (excluding the 
        parcels numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5), G, and J, T. 1 S., R. 1 
        E., Salt Lake Meridian.
                                 <all>
```