alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 238 (Tuesday, December 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 63707]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30192]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-65-000]

Southern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Revised Tariff Sheets

December 6, 1995.
    Take notice that on November 30, 1995, Southern Natural Gas Company 
(Southern) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Seventh 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to become effective 
January 1, 1996:

Twenty-sixth Revised Sheet No. 15
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 15a
Twenty-sixth Revised Sheet No. 17
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 17a
Fourteenth Revised Sheet No. 18
First Revised Sheet No. 18a

    Section 14.2 of Southern's Tariff provides for an annual 
reconciliation of Southern's storage costs to reflect differences 
between the cost to Southern of its storage gas inventory and the 
amount Southern receives for such gas arising out of (i) the purchase 
and sale of such gas in order to resolve shipper imbalances; and (ii) 
the purchase and sale of gas as necessary to maintain an appropriate 
level of storage gas inventory for system management purposes. In the 
instant filing, Southern submits the rate surcharge to the 
transportation component of its rates under Rate Schedules FT, FT-NN, 
and IT resulting from the fixed and realized losses it has incurred 
from the purchase and sale of its storage gas inventory.
    Southern states that copies of the filing were served upon 
Southern's customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with 18 CFR 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. Pursuant to Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
regulations, all such motions or protests must be filed not later than 
12 days after the date of the filing noted above. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of Southern's filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-30192 Filed 12-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

       CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NASB Financial, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Rhonda Nyhus, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.


August 8, 2008              By:  /s/ Rhonda Nyhus
                                 Rhonda Nyhus
                                 Vice President and Treasurer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to NASB Financial, Inc. and will be retained by NASB
Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.



This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein , and not for
any other purpose.

<Page>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lionbridge Technologies, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Rory J. Cowan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Donald M. Muir, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 10, 2008



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ RORY J. COWAN      
|Rory J. Cowan          
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|/s/ DONALD M. MUIR     
|Donald M. Muir         
|Chief Financial Officer



35
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED
JUNE 26, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-26-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-26-1999
<CASH>                                         173,350
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  219,277
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,317)
<INVENTORY>                                    667,514
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,103,619
<PP&E>                                         425,965
<DEPRECIATION>                               (198,852)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,465,848
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          953,559
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           941
<OTHER-SE>                                     375,179
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,465,848
<SALES>                                      6,321,391
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,321,391
<CGS>                                        5,518,330
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,518,330
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               857,277
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,906
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (73,196)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (27,449)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (45,747)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (45,747)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.50)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 13.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT**

**TO SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Intertape Polymer Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gregory A.C. Yull, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and 

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company. 

Date:    March 29, 2017
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,650
<SECURITIES>                                     3,304
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,747
<ALLOWANCES>                                        30
<INVENTORY>                                      6,536
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,583
<PP&E>                                           1,858
<DEPRECIATION>                                     678
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,794
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,708
<BONDS>                                             11
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           113
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,965
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,794
<SALES>                                         21,498
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,588
<CGS>                                           11,242
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,242
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,900
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    10
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   4
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,356
<INCOME-TAX>                                       965
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,391
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,391
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11
        

</TABLE>
Schedule of warrants issued by Blackhawk



 Exhibit 4.13 
 Schedule of warrants issued by Blackhawk to members of the board of managers and executive officers of Blackhawk 
  

												
	 Date Issued
	  	 Name of Warrant Holders
	  	Number
of Units	  	 Type of Units
	  	Exercise
Price	  	 Expiration Date

	 June 30, 2006
	  	Ronald L. Mapes	  	50,000	  	Class A Units	  	$	1.00	  	December 20, 2009
	 June 30, 2006
	  	Jon Rosenstiel	  	50,000	  	Class A Units	  	$	1.00	  	December 20, 2009
	 June 30, 2006
	  	Ronald Fluegel	  	50,000	  	Class A Units	  	$	1.00	  	December 20, 2009
	 June 30, 2006
	  	Quentin H. Davis	  	50,000	  	Class A Units	  	$	1.00	  	December 20, 2009
	 June 30, 2006
	  	Gary J. Bocker	  	50,000	  	Class A Units	  	$	1.00	  	December 20, 2009
	 June 30, 2006
	  	Criss Davis	  	50,000	  	Class A Units	  	$	1.00	  	December 20, 2009
	 June 30, 2006
	  	Karl Lawfer	  	50,000	  	Class A Units	  	$	1.00	  	December 20, 2009
	 June 30, 2006
	  	David D. Shockey	  	50,000	  	Class A Units	  	$	1.00	  	December 20, 2009
	 June 30, 2006
	  	Brad Smith	  	50,000	  	Class A Units	  	$	1.00	  	December 20, 2009
	 June 30, 2006
	  	Dennis C. Wilke	  	50,000	  	Class A Units	  	$	1.00	  	December 20, 2009
	 June 30, 2006
	  	Marvin Wurster	  	50,000	  	Class A Units	  	$	1.00	  	December 20, 2009
ACTUARIAL NOTE
Number 142
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO\
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Online Vacation Center Holdings Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Edward B. Rudner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Date: August 12, 2008


/s/ Edward B. Rudner
--------------------
Edward B. Rudner
Chief Executive Officer
#### MILDRED MERRIMON v. POSTAL TELEGRAPH & CABLE COMPANY.

(Filed 22 September, 1937.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *Pless, J.,*at January Term, 1937, of BuNcomke.

Civil action to recover damages from alleged breach of verbal contract for permanent employment.

Defendant denied that contract was made, and, among numerous defenses, pleaded the three-year statute of limitations.

*830•On verdict determining tbe issue on tbe plea adversely to plaintiff, judgment was rendered, from wbicb plaintiff appealed to tbe Supreme Court, and assigned error.

*Bon C. Young for plaintiff, appellant.*

*Alfred 8. Barnard for defendant, appellee.*

Pek CuRiam.

Tbe plaintiff, having based her cause upon verbal contract, failed to carry tbe burden against tbe plea of tbe statute of limitations. In tbe judgment below, we find

No error.
### Proposed Provision: A2. Starting December 2024, reduce the annual COLA by 0.5 percentage point.

back
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. WR-88,531-01 AND -02

EX PARTE JONATHAN GLEN JOHNSON, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. 1377007-A AND 1377006-A IN THE 263RD DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex

parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two

offenses of aggravated robbery and sentenced to imprisonment.

This Court previously denied these two habeas applications without written order based on

the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. Applicant, through habeas counsel, suggests

that this Court should reconsider the denials. This Court withdraws the prior denials of habeas corpus

relief. This Court’s independent review of the habeas record shows that Applicant is not entitled to
2

habeas relief. The habeas applications are denied. Copies of this order shall be sent to the Texas

Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional Institutions Division and Pardons and ParolesDivision.

Filed: September 18, 2019

Do not publish
Exhibit 10.25


 


English Translation of Form of 


Service Agreement


 


Party A:Sanciajia
Co., Ltd. (“you”)


Address:4th
Floor, Quan Ji Hotel, Fengcheng 2nd Road, Weiyang District, Xi'an City, Shaanxi Province


Contact person:


Contact number:


 


Party B:Alibaba Cloud Computing Co., Ltd.


Address:Building
1, Aliyun Feitian Park, Yunqi Town, Xihu District, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province


Contact person


Contact number:


 


		1.	You ordered the following products/services from Party B through
your Alibaba Cloud account ________________:



 


	No.	Order number	Service	
    Description of Model and configuration

     
	Quantity	External IP Address	Service period	Service fee	Cash amount
	 	
     

     
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Total	Prepayment (RMB)


 


		2.	Other rights and obligations of both parties regarding the above-mentioned services shall be subject to the service terms agreed by
both parties (the authorization form includes but is not limited to the seals of both parties, or you can authorize online when ordering
the services).



 


		3.	You should make payment in a timely manner. If you choose the prepaid service, Party B will only start
to provide their service after the receiving their payment. If you do not make payment within 7 days of placing an order, all the service
terms you have reached with Party B will be voided. If you choose the to pay for the service afterwards, you will use the service first
and pay fees on an hourly or daily basis depending on the product you ordered. Please check the price of the product on the website www.aliyun.com.
The pricing model published on the website page shall prevail.



 


		4.	Party B reserves the right not to provide you with services and/or technical support, or to terminate
services and/or technical support before you have paid all the fees as agreed. At the same time, Party B reserves the right to pursue
legal responsibility for unpaid services.



 


5. You should make payment to the following account designated by Party
B


Account name:


Account Bank:


Account number:


 


6. Invoice: You can log in to www.aliyun.com to apply for an invoice.
Aliyun will issue you an invoice and mail it to you.


 


	Party A:Sanciajia Co., Ltd.	Party B:Alibaba Cloud Computing Co., Ltd.
	(seal)	(seal)

                                                                                 

                                                                                 

                                                                                 

                                                                                 

                                                                                 

                                                                                 

	Date:     	Date:
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

__________________________

JOHN-PIERRE BANEY, Petitioner,

v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.

__________________________ 2013-3003

__________________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. DA0752120158-I-1.

__________________________ ON MOTION

__________________________ O R D E R The Department of Justice moves to recaption to name the Merit Systems Protection Board as respondent. Mr. Baney opposes.Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is designated as the respondent when the Board's decision concerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. The employing agency is designated as the respondent when the Board reaches the merits of the under lying case. Here, the Board Case: 13-3003 Document: 12 Page: 1 Filed: 12/07/2012JOHN

- PIERRE BANEY V

. MSPB 2
dismissed Baney’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Thus, the Board is the proper respondent in this petition for review. Accordingly, I T I S O RDERED T HAT : The motion is granted. The revised official caption is reflected above. The Board’s responsive brief is due within 21 days of the date of filing of this order.
F OR T HE C OURT
/s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk s21 Case: 13-3003 Document: 12 Page: 2 Filed: 12/07/2012
#### ISAAC M. DOTSON v. F. S. ROYSTER GUANO COMPANY.

(Filed 20 November, 1935.)

Appeal by defendant from *Clement, J.,*at March Term, 1935, of MECKLENBURG.

Civil action for breach of contract.

Yerdict and judgment for plaintiff, from which the defendant appeals, assigning errors.

*J ohn M. Robinson and Marvin L. Ritch for plaintiff.*

*Willcox, CooTce & Willcox and Tillett, Tillett <& Kennedy for defendant.*

Per Curiam;.

This is the same case that was before us at the Fall Term, 1934, when a partial new trial was granted, limited to the issue of damages, opinion filed 28 January, 1935, reported in 207 N. 0., 635, 178 S. E., 100.

The second trial substantially accords with our former opinion. It is true, the evidence was somewhat different, due to the necessity of conforming to our interpretation of the contract, thus rendering the special prayer requested on the first hearing inappropriate, but we have discovered no reversible error on the present hearing.

No error.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0003480 27-MAR-2014 10:55 AM
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                     | BIOMODA, INC.                                                                       |
|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |                                                                                |   |
| Dated: November 17, 2010 | By:                                                                       | /s/ John J. Cousins                                     |
|                     | John J. Cousins                                                                     |
|                     | President & Chief Financial Officer(Principal Executive and Accounting Officer) |
### Proposed Provision: E3.1. Increase the taxable maximum such that 90 percent of earnings would be subject to the payroll tax (phased in 2024-2033). Provide benefit credit for earnings up to the revised taxable maximum.