alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 33.2**

 

**Report onAssessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria**

 

1.                                       First DataResources, LLC, through its affiliate REMITCO, LLC (jointly, the “AssertingParty”) is responsible for assessing compliance as of and for the 12-monthperiod ending December 31, 2007 (the “Reporting Period”) with theservicing criteria applicable to it under the Securities and ExchangeCommission’s Regulation AB Section 229.1122(d), except for the criteriaset forth in Sections 229.1122(d)(1)(i)-(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i)-(vii),1122(d)(3)(i)-(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i)-(iii), 1122(d)(4)(iv) (except withrespect to the servicing of transactions on the remittance payment platformrelating to the opening, listing, and depositing of remittance payments mailedto post office boxes serviced by the Asserting Party pursuant to the agreementsbetween the Asserting Party and Capital One Services, Inc., together withits affiliates, Capital One Bank and Capital One Auto Finance, Inc. (the “TransactionAgreements”)), and 1122(d)(4)(v)-(xv) (such criteria, after giving effect tothe preceding exceptions, the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”).  With respect to Item 1122(d)(4)(iv), theAsserting Party’s responsibility is limited to the opening, listing, anddepositing of remittance payments mailed to post office boxes serviced by theAsserting Party as required and pursuant to the Transaction Agreements, and theAsserting Party does not take responsibility for any other matters.

 

2.                                       The AssertingParty used the Applicable Servicing Criteria to assess the compliance with theApplicable Servicing Criteria;

 

3.                                       The AssertingParty has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable ServicingCriteria as of December 31, 2007, and for the Reporting Period****with respect to the opening, listing, and depositing ofremittance payments mailed to post office boxes serviced by the Asserting Partyas required and pursuant to the Transaction Agreements;

 

4.                                       Ernst &Young LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestationreport on the Asserting Party’s assessment of compliance with the ApplicableServicing Criteria as of December 31, 2007 and for the Reporting Period asset forth in this report.

 

 
| First Data Resources, LLC  | REMITCO, LLC     |
|---------------------------------|------------------|
|                            |             |   |
| By:                             | /s/ Sally Else   |   | By: | /s/ Sally Else |
| Name: Sally Else                | Name: Sally Else |
| Title: SVP                      | Title: President |
|                                 |                  |  |  |  |

 

 

March 10, 2008

 

----
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES -OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 I, James A. Winne III, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this
annual report on Form 10-K/A of Belden & Blake Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: August 2, 2005

/s/ James A. Winne IIIJames A. Winne III, Chief Executive Officer andChairman of the Board of Directors
#### Thomas Donohue, Respondent, v. Isaac A. Singer, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Opinion by

Dykman, J.
734 A.2d 1245

#### IN THE MATTER OF DWAYNE C. VAUGHN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

August 6, 1999.

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is ORDERED that DWAYNE C. VAUGHN of STONE MOUNTAIN, GEORGIA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1981, and who was temporarily suspended from the practice of law effective March 15, 1999, by Order of this Court dated February 11, 1999, be restored to the practice of law, effective immediately.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

#71414115_v2 1

HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP 

Thomas D. Leland (pro hac vice) 

Leah E. Capritta (pro hac vice) 

1801 California Street, Suite 5000 

Denver, CO 80202 

Telephone: (303) 974-6660 

Facsimile: (303) 974-6659 

Email: thomas.leland@hklaw.com 

 leah.capritta@hklaw.com 

HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP 

Vince Farhat (SBN 183794) 

400 South Hope Street, 8th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90071 

Telephone: (213) 896-2400 

Facsimile: (213) 896-2450 

Email: vince.farhat@hklaw.com 

 

Attorneys for 

TIGER NATURAL GAS, INC. 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re 

PG&E CORPORATION 

 -andPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, 

 Debtors. 

□ Affects PG&E Corporation 

■ Affects Pacific Gas and Electric 

Company 

□ Affects both Debtors 

*All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case, 

No. 19-30088 (DM)

)

)

)

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

CASE NO. 19-30088 (DM) 

Chapter 11 

(Lead Case) 

(Jointly Administered) 

DECLARATION OF LEAH E. 

CAPRITTA TIGER NATURAL GAS, 

INC.’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF 

MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM STAY 

PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. § 362(d)(1) 

Date: November 13, 2019 

Time: 10:00 AM (Pacific Time) 

Place: United States Bankruptcy Court 

 Courtroom 17, 16th Floor 

 San Francisco, CA 94102 

Objection 

Deadline: November 8, 2019 

 4:00 p.m. (Pacific Time) 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4661-1 Filed: 11/11/19 Entered: 11/11/19 16:31:55 Page 1

of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

#71414115_v2 2

DECLARATION OF LEAH E. CAPRITTA 

I, Leah E. Capritta, declare as follows: 

1. I am over the age of 18 and have personal knowledge of the matters stated herein. I 

am an attorney at law licensed to practice in the State of Colorado and admitted pro hac vice to 

practice before this Court. I am a partner at the law firm of Holland & Knight LLP and 

am counsel for Tiger Natural Gas, Inc. (“Tiger”). I make this declaration in support of Tiger’s 

Reply in Support of Motion for Relief from the Automatic Stay. I have personal knowledge of the 

facts set forth below, and if called and sworn as a witness, I could and would testify competently 

thereto. 

2. A true and correct copy of excerpts from Michael Quinn, Ph.D.’s deposition, 

dated September 29, 2017, have been filed under seal contemporaneously herewith. 

3. A true and correct copy of excerpts from Daniel W. Ray’s deposition, dated 

October 4, 2017, have been filed under seal contemporaneously herewith. 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 

foregoing is true and correct. 

DATED: November 11, 2019 HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP 

By: /s/ Leah E. Capritta Leah E. Capritta 

 Attorneys for Tiger Natural Gas, Inc.

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4661-1 Filed: 11/11/19 Entered: 11/11/19 16:31:55 Page 2

of 2
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
      THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Pacific Copper
      Corp. (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge,
      that:





The
      Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended October 31, 2007 (the “Form
      10-KSB”) of the Company fully complies with the requirement of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained
      in
      the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      January 22, 2008





/s/
                Andrew BrodkeyAndrew
                Brodkey, CEO and Director(Chief
                Executive Officer of Pacific Copper
              Corp.)





Dated:
      January 23, 2008





/s/
                Rakesh MalhotraRakesh
                Malhotra, Chief Financial Officer(Chief
                Financial Officer of Pacific CopperCorp.)





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Pacific Copper Corp. and will be retained by Pacific Copper Corp. and furnished
      to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
#### NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY.

(Filed 9 November, 1955.)

Appeal and Error § 38—

Where the Supreme Court is evenly divided in opinion, the decision of the lower court will be affirmed without becoming a precedent.

Appeal by defendant from *Williams, J.,*at May Civil Term, 1955, of WaKE.

*Simms & Simms, attorneys for plaintiff, appellee, and A. J. Winder and C. J. Collins of Norfolk, Virginia, and E. B. Ussery of Columbia, South Carolina, of counsel for plaintiff, appellee.*

*■Smith, Leach, Anderson & Dorsett and Joyner & Howison for defendant, appellant.*

PeR CüRiam.

This is a civil action to enjoin the threatened abrogation of an operating contract involving the interchange of freight and division of revenue between the plaintiff and the defendant, common carriers by rail.

The plaintiff moved the trial court for a temporary order restraining abrogation of the contract pending final hearing of the cause. The motion was allowed, and from judgment entered in accordance with such ruling, the defendant appeals.

The Court being evenly divided in opinion as to the correctness of the foregoing ruling, *Justice Higgins*not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed, without becoming a precedent. *Trust Co. v. Merrick,*211 N.C. 739, 191 S.E. 5. The plaintiff’s motion, made in this Court, to amend the complaint is denied.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 240 (Thursday, December 14, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 64255]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30443]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
48 CFR Part 31

[Federal Acquisition Circular 90-35]


Federal Acquisition Regulation; Rates of Inflation

AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DOD), General Services Administration 
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Annual notice of rates of inflation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense Acquisition 
Regulations Council have agreed to publish as an information item, the 
rates of inflation which are used in conjunction with other factors to 
determine the allowability of IR&D/B&P costs for major contractors 
under 31.205-18(c)(2)(i)(C)(2) during the first three contractor fiscal 
years beginning on or after October 1, 1992. The following rates of 
inflation are effective immediately, and shall remain in effect until 
superseded by the next publication, which is anticipated in January 
1996:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Annual  
                         Fiscal year                          percentage
                                                                 rate   
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1994........................................................        2.5 
1995........................................................        2.9 
1996........................................................        3.0 
1997........................................................        3.0 
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The above rates are the Price Escalation Indices for the Research, 
Development, Test & Evaluation (RDT&E) Account, Total Obligation 
Authority (TOA), issued by the Principal Deputy Under Secretary of 
Defense (Comptroller) on January 10, 1995. These rates of inflation 
supersede those published in FAC 90-23, Item XL--Annual Notice of Rates 
of Inflation, in the Federal Register on December 28, 1994.

    Dated: December 8, 1995.
Edward C. Loeb,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Acquisition Policy.
[FR Doc. 95-30443 Filed 12-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-M
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5773 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5773

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and the Employee Retirement 
 Income Security Act of 1974 to extend certain provisions relating to 
              multiemployer defined benefit pension plans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 1, 2014

 Mr. Crowley introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
   Committee on Education and the Workforce, and in addition to the 
Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined 
 by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as 
        fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and the Employee Retirement 
 Income Security Act of 1974 to extend certain provisions relating to 
              multiemployer defined benefit pension plans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTOMATIC EXTENSION OF AMORTIZATION PERIODS.

    (a) Amendment to Internal Revenue Code of 1986.--Subparagraph (C) 
of section 431(d)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by 
striking ``December 31, 2014'' and inserting ``December 31, 2015''.
    (b) Amendment to Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.--
Subparagraph (C) of section 304(d)(1) of the Employee Retirement Income 
Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1084(d)(1)(C)) is amended by striking 
``December 31, 2014'' and inserting ``December 31, 2015''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to applications submitted under section 431(d)(1)(A) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and section 304(d)(1)(C) of the Employee 
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 after December 31, 2014.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF FUNDING IMPROVEMENT AND REHABILITATION PLAN RULES.

    (a) In General.--Paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 221(c) of the 
Pension Protection Act of 2006 are each amended by striking ``December 
31, 2014'' and inserting ``December 31, 2015''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Paragraph (2) of section 221(c) of the 
Pension Protection Act of 2006 is amended by striking ``January 1, 
2015'' and inserting ``January 1, 2016''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to plan years beginning after December 31, 2014.
                                 <all>
```
## Summary Measures and Graphs

- Individual Provisions
- Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable)

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						E3.8: Beginning in 2031, apply 2 percent payroll tax rate on earnings over the wage-indexed equivalent of $200,000 in 2017 (about $348,300 in 2031), with the threshold wage-indexed after 2031. Provide proportional benefit credit for additional earnings taxed, based on the payroll tax rate applied to the additional earnings divided by the full 12.4 percent payroll tax rate.**

|  |  |
|--|--|
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Michael S. Leto, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
report on Form 10-K of the Corporate Backed Callable Trust Certificates, J.C. Penney Debenture-Backed Series 2007-1 Trust (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement
required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing, or similar, agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank National
Association, as Trustee.

Date: March 28, 2014



|       |  |                                                                                                                   
|------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Michael S. Leto                                                                                               
|Name:  |  | Michael S. Leto                                                                                                   
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice
President (Senior Officer in charge of securitization of the Depositor)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6811
ROBERT EDWARD LUNDQUIST, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-1047-5-F) Submitted: November 6, 1997 Decided: November 25, 1997 Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Edward Lundquist, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, R aleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Lundquist v. North Carolina , No. CA-96-1047-5-F (E.D.N.C. Apr. 24, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Mary Cramer v. Jane Forbis, Minor Heir of Sarah Forbis. Deceased.

*Guardian and Ward—Appointment of Guardian by County*Court— *Appeal.*

An appeal will not lie from an order of the County Court, appointing a guardian for a child over fourteen years of age.

[Opinion filed January 21, 1889.]

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Logan County; the Hon. G. W. Herdman, Judge, presiding.

Mr. W. B. Jones, for appellant.

Messrs. Beach & Hodnett, for appellee.

*260Conger, J.

The only question presented by this record is, can an appeal be taken from the order of the County Court appointing a guardian for a child over fourteen years of age, by the grandmother of such child, who objects to the person so appointed ?

The Circuit Court held an appeal did not lie in such case, and this, we think, was the correct view. The statute provides that when a minor over fourteen years of age has nominated his guardian, such person shall be appointed by the court, “if deemed a suitable person.”

This leaves the matter in the discretion of the County Court, and it would doubtless be proper for the court to hear any suggestion the relatives of such minor might offer as to whether the person to be appointed is a suitable person or not, but it can not be that every person dissatisfied with such an appointment can litigate the matter" with the ward through the courts. Ho such right exists.

The judgment of the Circuit Court will be affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*