alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 34.1


                     r Ernst & Young LLP                 r Phone:(612) 343-1000
                     220 South Sixth Street, Ste. 1400   www.ey.com
                     Minneapolis, MN 55402-4509







            Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors
U.S. Bank National Association

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report
on Assessment of Compliance with Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that U.S. Bank National Association (the
Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the
SEC's Regulation AB for the Structured Repackaging platform (the Platform) as
of and for the year ended December 31, 2007, except for servicing criteria
1122(d)(1)(i), 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(i),
1122(d)(4)(vi), and 1122(d)(4)(ix)-(xv), which the Company has determined are
not applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the
servicing platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the
Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as
adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination
included testing of less than all of the individual asset backed transactions
and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the
servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the
Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected
activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our
procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities
performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our
procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred
either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances
or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by
this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We
believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31,
2007, for the Structured Repackaging platform is fairly stated, in all
material respects.

                                                       /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
February 12, 2008
EXEMPTION CERTIFICATE

TAX ON OCCUPANCY OFHOTEL ROOMS

TO BE RETAINED BY OPERATORS OF HOTELS,

MOTELS, AND SIMILAR ACCOMODATIONS AS

EVIDENCE OF EXEMPT OCCUPANCY

Name of Hotel, Apartment Hotel, or Lodging House

Address

OPERATORS OF HOTELS, SHOULD NOT ACCEPT

THIS CERTIFICATE UNLESS THE OFFICER OR 

EMPLOYEE PRESENTING IT SHOWS

SATISFACTORY CREDENTIALS

DATE , 20___

This to certify that I, the undersigned, am a representative of the United States Governmental

department, agency, or instrumentality indicated below; that the charges for the occupancy at the above

establishment on the dates set forth below have been or will be paid for by such governmental unit: and

that such charges are incurred in the performance of my official duties as a representative of such

governmental unit.

DATESOF OCCUPANCY

(Signature)

GOVERNMENTAL UNIT _________________ (Title)

Note: A separate exemption certificate is required for each occupancy and for each representative or employee.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LABATON SUCHAROW LLP 

Thomas A. Dubbs 

Carol C. Villegas 

Jeffrey A. Dubbin (SBN 287199) 

140 Broadway 

New York, New York 10005 

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP 

Michael S. Etkin (pro hac vice) 

Andrew Behlmann (pro hac vice) 

One Lowenstein Drive 

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

Lead Counsel to Lead Plaintiff and the Class Bankruptcy Counsel to Lead Plaintiff 

and the Class 

MICHELSON LAW GROUP 

Randy Michelson (SBN 114095) 

220 Montgomery Street, Suite 2100 

San Francisco, California 94104 

Bankruptcy Counsel to Lead Plaintiff 

and the Class

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION 

 - and – 

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, 

 Debtors. 

☒ Affects Both Debtors 

☐ Affects PG&E Corporation 

☐ Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company 

Case No. 19-30088 (DM) (Lead Case) 

Chapter 11 

(Jointly Administered)

ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE 

 APPLICATION FOR ORDER 

 PURSUANT TO B.L.R. 9013-1(c) 

 AUTHORIZING OVERSIZE REPLY BRIEF 

 IN SUPPORT OF SECURITIES LEAD 

 PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO APPLY

BANKRUPTCY RULE 7023 TO CLASS 

PROOF OF CLAIM

The Court, having reviewed the Ex Parte Application for Order Pursuant to B.L.R. 9013-

1(c) Authorizing Oversize Reply Brief in support of Securities Lead Plaintiff’s Motion to Apply 

Bankruptcy Rule 7023 to Class Proof of Claim (the “Application”), and good cause appearing, IT 

IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

1. The Application is granted, and 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5447-1 Filed: 01/22/20 Entered: 01/22/20 14:38:46 Page 1

of 2
-2- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2. Public Employees Retirement Association of New Mexico, the court-appointed 

lead plaintiff in the securities class action captioned as In re PG&E Corporation Securities 

Litigation, Case No. 18-03509 (the “Securities Litigation”), pending in the United States District 

Court for the Northern District of California, on behalf of itself and the proposed class it represents 

in the Securities Litigation, together with York County on behalf of the County of York Retirement 

Fund, City of Warren Police and Fire Retirement System, and Mid-Jersey Trucking Industry & 

Local No. 701 Pension Fund, is authorized to file and serve a reply brief in excess of 15 pages of 

text, but not to exceed 25 pages of text (exclusive of any schedules or exhibits thereto and/or any 

declarations filed in connection therewith) in support of the Motion to Apply Bankruptcy Rule 

7023 to Class Proof of Claim. 

 ** END OF ORDER ** 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5447-1 Filed: 01/22/20 Entered: 01/22/20 14:38:46 Page 2

of 2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7568]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3098]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Whitewater Bancorp, Inc.; Notice of Application to Engage de novo 
in Permissible Nonbanking Activities

    The company listed in this notice has filed an application under 
Sec.  225.23(a)(1) of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.23(a)(1)) 
for the Board's approval under section 4(c)(8) of the Bank Holding 
Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843(c)(8)) and Sec.  225.21(a) of Regulation Y 
(12 CFR 225.21(a)) to commence or to engage de novo, either directly or 
through a subsidiary, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in Sec.  
225.25 of Regulation Y as closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, such activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    The application is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing on the question whether consummation of the proposal can 
``reasonably be expected to produce benefits to the public, such as 
greater convenience, increased competition, or gains in efficiency, 
that outweigh possible adverse effects, such as undue concentration of 
resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interests, or 
unsound banking practices.'' Any request for a hearing on this question 
must be accompanied by a statement of the reasons a written 
presentation would not suffice in lieu of a hearing, identifying 
specifically any questions of fact that are in dispute, summarizing the 
evidence that would be presented at a hearing, and indicating how the 
party commenting would be aggrieved by approval of the proposal.
    Comments regarding the application must be received at the Reserve 
Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than 
February 22, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (James A. Bluemle, Vice 
President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690:
    1. Whitewater Bancorp, Inc., Whitewater, Wisconsin; to engage de 
novo in the purchasing of loan participations and the making of direct 
loans, pursuant to Sec.  225.25(b)(1) of the Board's Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 2, 
1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-3098 Filed 2-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 21 (Tuesday, February 2, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 5507]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-01886]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: 30-Day notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Small Business Administration (SBA) is publishing this 
notice to comply with requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) 
(44 U.S.C. chapter 35), which requires agencies to submit proposed 
reporting and recordkeeping requirements to OMB for review and 
approval, and to publish a notice in the Federal Register notifying the 
public that the agency has made such a submission. This notice also 
allows an additional 30 days for public comments.

DATES: Submit comments on or before March 3, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to the information collection by name 
and/or OMB Control Number and should be sent to: Agency Clearance 
Officer, Curtis Rich, Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street 
SW., 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20416; and SBA Desk Officer, Office of 
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 
New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Curtis Rich, Agency Clearance Officer, 
(202) 205-7030 <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#593a2c2b2d302a772b303a31192a3b38773e362f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e1829493958892cf93888289a1928380cf868e97">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Copies: A copy of the Form OMB 83-1, supporting statement, and 
other documents submitted to OMB for review may be obtained from the 
Agency Clearance Officer.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Small Business Administration Surety Bond 
Guarantee Program was created to encourage surety companies to issue 
bonds for small contractors. The information collected on these forms 
from Small Business contractors or surety companies/agents is used to 
evaluate the eligibility of program application. One form is used by 
surety companies to request claims payments or report recoveries 
related to defaulted contractors.

Solicitation of Public Comments

    Title: Surety Bond Guarantees Assistance.
    Description of Respondents: Surety Companies.
    Form Number: SBA Forms 990, 991, 994, 994B, 994F, 994H.
    Estimated Annual Responses: 1,026.
    Estimated Annual Hour Burden: 3,065.

Curtis B. Rich,
Management Analyst.
[FR Doc. 2016-01886 Filed 2-1-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 99.1**

**AGGREGATE      SCHEDULE OF PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST DISTRIBUTIONS TO CERTIFICATEHOLDERS**

| Class | Interest     | Principal     | Losses | Ending                Balance |
|-------|--------------|---------------|--------|-------------------------------|
| A-1   | 6,625,668.67 | 21,394,790.34 | -      | 133,967,709.67                |
| A-2   | 1,736,069.36 | 2,567,374.83  | -      | 16,076,125.16                 |
| A-3   | -            | 507,853.26    | -      | -                             |
| A-4   | 2,315,781.30 | -             | -      | 44,463,000.00                 |
| A-5   | 549,270.80   | -             | -      | 10,546,000.00                 |
| A-6   | 1,062,318.45 | 3,442,721.10  | -      | 21,557,278.89                 |
| A-7   | 283,202.17   | 413,126.53    | -      | 2,586,873.47                  |
| A-P0  | -            | 56,929.13     | -      | 2,337,284.94                  |
| A-R   | 0.52         | 100.00        | -      | -                             |
| B-1   | 385,923.70   | 36,684.90     | -      | 7,389,315.10                  |
| B-2   | 135,795.68   | 12,908.38     | -      | 2,600,091.62                  |
| B-3   | 100,040.83   | 9,509.62      | -      | 1,915,490.38                  |
| B-4   | 64,337.93    | 6,115.80      | -      | 1,231,884.20                  |
| B-5   | 50,046.41    | 4,757.30      | -      | 958,242.72                    |
| B-6   | 50,027.61    | 4,755.50      | -      | 957,883.01                    |

----
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED March 8, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50478 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus DEMARIO DONNELL SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.

Consolidated with No. 06-50541 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CHRISTOPHER EUGENE BRADFORD, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:05-CR-507-2 USDC No. 5:05-CR-507-3

-------------------- Before DeMOSS, STEWART and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *No. 06-50478 c/w No. 06-50541 -2- Following the denial of a motion to suppress a firearm and cash discovered during a vehicle search (following a traffic stop), Demario Donnell Smith and Christopher Eugene Bradford entered conditional guilty pleas to bank robbery and aiding and abetting. Smith and Bradford were both sentenced to 96 months of imprisonment. They now appeal the denial of the suppression motion. They do not challenge the validity of the initial stop. Instead, they argue only that the vehicle search was improper. Conclusions of law concerning a motion to suppress are reviewed de novo; findings of fact, for clear error. United
States v. Navarro , 169 F.3d 228, 231 (5th Cir. 1999). The appellants do not challenge any findings of fact. In this case, the officer who made the stop received a lookout alert for three black males in a black Honda Civic who had just committed an armed bank robbery. Shortly thereafter, the officer observed Smith and two other black males in just such a vehicle. As the officer approached the vehicle on foot, he saw the occupant in the back seat of the vehicle move abruptly in the vehicle. Under these circumstances, any reasonably prudent officer would have feared for his safety. Thus, the protective search of the vehicle in this case did not violate the Fourth Amendment. See Michigan v. Long , 463 U.S. 1032, 1051 (1983); United States v. Wallen , 388 F.3d 161, 165-66 (5th Cir. 2004); United States v. Shabazz , 993 F.2d 431, 434 (5th Cir. 1993). Since the firearm and the cash were hidden in an area of the center console thatNo. 06-50478 c/w No. 06-50541 -3- was easily accessible to the occupants of the vehicle, the officers did not exceed their authority in searching that area. We therefore uphold the district court’s denial of the suppression motion. Bradford also challenges his 96-month sentence as an unreasonable upward deviation from his guideline sentencing range of 63 to 78 months. The district court’s stated reasons for the sentence imposed enable us to determine that the factors set forth at 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) support the sentence. See United States v. Smith , 440 F.3d, 704, 709-10 (5th Cir. 2006). Moreover, the deviation was reasonable. Id. at 708 n.5, 709-10. We therefore uphold the sentence imposed by the district court.
AFFIRMED.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 134008 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STAT E OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 134008 COA: 276500 Oakland CC: 2006-206357-FH ANNE DARLENE SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 18, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0830 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 10, 2007

Clerk
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3259 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to recognize Indian tribal 

governments for purposes of determining under the adoption credit 

whether a child has special needs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2021 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Mr. HOEVEN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to recognize 

Indian tribal governments for purposes of determining 

under the adoption credit whether a child has special 

needs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tribal Adoption Parity 

5 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3259 IS

1 SEC. 2. RECOGNIZING INDIAN TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS FOR 

2 PURPOSES OF DETERMINING UNDER THE 

3 ADOPTION CREDIT WHETHER A CHILD HAS 

4 SPECIAL NEEDS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (3) of section 23(d) of 

6 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 

7 (1) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ‘‘or In8 dian tribal government’’ after the words ‘‘a State’’, 

9 and 

10 (2) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ‘‘or In11 dian tribal government’’ after the words ‘‘such 

12 State’’. 

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

14 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

15 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Home** Our Work ** Public Information Pamphlets

# Public Information Pamphlets

**Discover the Susquehanna River Basin!** Please view our series ofPublic Information Pamphlets, or PIPs, that cover a variety of river basin topics.Learn more about SRBC activities, river management issues, and roles that you canplay to protect the water resources of theSusquehanna River Basin.

PDF

PDF

PDF

PDF

PDF

PDF

PDF

PDF

PDF

PDF

PDF

PDF

PDF

PDF

##### Contact Information

Gene VenoDirector, Governmental Affairs & Public Advocacy[email protected](717) 238-0423 ext. 1311
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members         
    -  AEE Multimedia 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# PHOTOS ANDVIDEOS

Search

Search

                                - All Images 
                                - Other 
                                - Space Shuttle 

                                - Upload Date
                                - Photo Date
                                - Title

Clear Search4 results found.