alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Nelson Skalbania certify that:  

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB/A (“Report”) of Solar Energy Limited;  

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;   

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the period presented in this Report;   

 

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;   

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and  

 

c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and  

 

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):   

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and   

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

Date: January 21, 2008  

 

/s/ Nelson Skalbania

Nelson Skalbania

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

 

33

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3370 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 686
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3370

                          [Report No. 117-284]

 To release the reversionary interest of the United States in certain 
   non-Federal land in Salt Lake City, Utah, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 9, 2021

  Mr. Lee (for himself and Mr. Romney) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

                           December 20, 2022

               Reported by Mr. Manchin, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To release the reversionary interest of the United States in certain 
   non-Federal land in Salt Lake City, Utah, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``University of Utah Research Park 
Act''.

SEC. 2. RELEASE OF REVERSIONARY INTEREST OF THE UNITED STATES IN NON-
              FEDERAL LAND IN SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH.

    (a) Release.--There is released to the University of Utah, without 
consideration, the reversionary interest of the United States in the 
non-Federal land described in subsection (b).
    (b) Description of Non-Federal Land.--The non-Federal land referred 
to in subsection (a) is the approximately 593 acres of land of the 
University of Utah--
            (1) identified in the patent--
                    (A) numbered 43-99-0012; and
                    (B) dated October 18, 1968; and
            (2) more particularly described as tracts D (excluding the 
        parcels numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5), G, and J, T. 1 S., R. 1 
        E., Salt Lake Meridian.
                                                       Calendar No. 686

117th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3370

                          [Report No. 117-284]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To release the reversionary interest of the United States in certain 
   non-Federal land in Salt Lake City, Utah, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           December 20, 2022

                       Reported without amendment
```
**Exhibit
      99.3**




**GUARANTY
      AGREEMENT**





For
      consideration to be received in connection with the performance of the Mine
      Lease Agreement among Pacific Copper Corp. (“Guarantor”) and Sociedad Pacific
      Copper Chile Limitada (“Limitada”) Guarantor does hereby unconditionally
      guarantee to Limitada, its successors and assigns (1) full and timely
      payment of all amounts due pursuant to the lease of certain mining claims
      identified as the “La Guanaca” claims (the “La Guanaca Lease”) and
      (2) performance of all of the other obligations of Limitada under the La
      Guanaca Lease, collectively being referred to herein as the
      "Obligations".




This
      Guaranty is a guaranty of payment and not of collection, is absolute and
      unconditional and shall be unaffected by any other guaranty or security which
      Limitada may obtain or by any amendment to or extension or renewal of the La
      Guanaca Lease or the assignment by Limitada of its interest in the La Guanaca
      Lease and shall be effective whether or not Limitada under the La Guanaca Lease
      shall have pursued any of its remedies, whether at law, in equity or pursuant
      to
      the La Guanaca Lease.




This
      Guaranty shall constitute a continuing guaranty independent of and in addition
      to any other security, collateral, or guaranty held by Limitada for the
      Obligations or any part thereof. The Guarantor’s liability hereunder shall be
      immediate and absolute and shall not be conditioned or contingent upon the
      pursuit, exercise or prosecution by Limitada of any rights it may have under
      the
      La Guanaca Lease.




The
      Guarantor hereby agrees to indemnify Limitada and hold it harmless from and
      against any and all losses, expenses and damages incurred by Limitada in
      connection with or as a result of the assertion of any and all claims arising
      pursuant to the Obligations.




This
      Guaranty may not be changed except by written agreement signed by the Guarantor
      and Limitada. If any provision of this Guaranty is declared unenforceable or
      invalid in whole or in part for any reason, the remaining provisions shall
      continue to be effective.




IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, Guarantor has executed this Guaranty as of the 28 th day of
      December, 2007.






PACIFIC
      COPPER CORP.








By:  /s/
      Stafford Kelley





Stafford
      Kelley


Corporate
      Secretary
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission             
  -  Warfighting Units             
  -  Frequently Asked Questions             
  -  Strategic Vision             
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander             
  -  Deputy Commander             
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader             
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General             
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request             
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator             
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate             
  -  Command Chaplain             
  -  Commandant             
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos             
  -  Speeches             
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest             
    -  AEE Members 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians             
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information             
  -  Checking In 

##### U.S. Space Command Public Affairs:719-554-3478

 

#### **QUICK LINKS**

#### Accessibility  |  Section 508    Web PolicySite Map  |  Defense.gov  |  Intel.govQuestions  |  Privacy and SecurityContact Us  |  Inspector General  |  FOIAOPM.gov  |  Plain Writing Act | MISONo Fear Act  |  Links DisclaimerUSA.gov  |  DoD Open Government

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In re:

Pacific Gas & Electric Corp., et al.

 Debtors.

Chapter 11

Case No. 19-30088 Chapter 11

(Jointly Administered)

TRANSFER OF CLAIM OTHER THAN FOR SECURITY

A CLAIM HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS CASE or deemed filed under 11 U.S.C. § 

1111(a). Transferee hereby gives evidence and notice pursuant to Rule 3001(e)(2) of the Federal

Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure of the transfer, other than for security, of the claim referenced in 

this evidence and notice.

RR Donnelley & Sons Co.

Name of Transferor

Phone: (630) 322-6006

Last Four Digits of Acct #: N/A

Name and Address where notices and 

payments to transferee should be sent:

Whitebox Relative Value Partners, LP

c/o Whitebox Advisors

3033 Excelsior Blvd, Suite 300

Minneapolis, MN 55416-4675

Attn: Scott Specken

Whitebox Relative Value Partners, LP

Name of Transferee

Phone: (612) 253-6061

Last Four Digits of Acct #: N/A

Claim No: 55492

Debtor: PG&E Corporation (19-30088)

Date Filed: October 16, 2019

Total Amount of Claim: $301,978.18

Transferred Amount of Claim: 

$301,978.18

I declare under penalty of perjury that the information provided in this notice is true and correct 

to the best of my knowledge and belief.

By:______________________________ Date:____________

Transferee/Transferee’s Agent

Penalty for making a false statement: Fine of up to $500,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years, 

or both. 18 U.S.C. 152 & 3571.

DocuSign Envelope ID: FB969202-C6CF-48D6-B8A8-977C62D727BB

1/6/2020 | 15:20 PST

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5305 Filed: 01/08/20 Entered: 01/08/20 11:44:07 Page 1 of

2
WHITEBOX RELATIVE VALUE PARTNERS, LP

c/o Whitebox Advisors

3033 Excelsior Blvd., Suite 300

Minneapolis, MN 55416-4675

Attn: Scott Specken

301,978.18

100

WHITEBOX RELATIVE VALUE PARTNERS, LP

DocuSign Envelope ID: AB06CF04-FE52-4BCF-82BF-F936329DC85D

Mark Strefling

Partner & CEO

DocuSign Envelope ID: FB969202-C6CF-48D6-B8A8-977C62D727BB

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5305 Filed: 01/08/20 Entered: 01/08/20 11:44:07 Page 2 of

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MAGAININ
PHARMACEUTICALS INC. FORM 10K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,435                   4,495
<SECURITIES>                                     8,209                  18,376
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,772                  23,050
<PP&E>                                           6,206                   6,240
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,413                   3,475
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,731                  25,891
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,164                  11,153
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            54                      46
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,498                  14,634
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,731                  25,891
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,746                  24,748
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 225                     196
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,216)                (23,304)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,216)                (23,304)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,216)                (23,304)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.52)                  (1.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.52)                  (1.05)


</TABLE>
#### STATE v. CECIL ARNOLD GASKINS.

(Filed 25 March, 1953.)

Criminal Law § 67b—

The denial of defendant’s motion in the Superior Court to remand the cause to the Recorder’s Court of the county is not a judgment final in its nature, and an appeal therefrom is premature and will be dismissed. G.S. 15-180.

Appeal by defendant from *Stevens, J.,*January Term, 1953, CeaveN.

A warrant, charging tbat defendant did unlawfully (1) operate a motor vehicle upon tbe public highways of tbe State while under tbe influence of liquor, and (2) have in bis possession a quantity of nontax-paid liquor, issued out of tbe county court of Craven County. When tbe case was called for trial, tbe defendant demanded a trial by jury. Thereafter, at tbe January, 1953, Craven County Superior Court, the defendant appeared and moved to remand tbe cause to tbe recorder’s court. Tbe solicitor agreed not to send a bill of indictment until tbe court first ruled on tbe motion. Tbe motion was denied and defendant appealed.

*439
      *Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorney-General Bruton for the State.*

*Charles L. Abernethy, Jr., for defendant appellant.*

Pee. Curiam.

In criminal cases a defendant may appeal to tbe Supreme Court only from a conviction or from some judgment that is final in its nature. G.S. 15-180; *S. v. Blades,*209 N.C. 56, 182 S.E. 714; *S. v. Hiatt,*211 N.C. 116, 189 S.E. 124; *S. v. Inman,*224 N.C. 531, 31 S.E. 2d 641. The order denying defendant’s motion to remand is purely interlocutory. It is in no sense final. Appeal therefrom was premature, *S. v. Hiatt, supra,*and must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3400 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3400

 To prohibit the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency 
from imposing a fee or reporting requirements on certain facilities for 
                           methane emissions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 15, 2021

  Mr. Marshall (for himself, Mr. Moran, Mr. Lankford, Mr. Daines, Mr. 
  Cruz, and Mr. Inhofe) introduced the following bill; which was read 
  twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency 
from imposing a fee or reporting requirements on certain facilities for 
                           methane emissions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Marginal Well Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. METHANE FEE AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR PETROLEUM AND 
              NATURAL GAS SYSTEMS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the owner or operator 
of a facility that produces fewer than 15 barrels of oil per day and 
less than 90,000 cubic feet of natural gas per day shall not, with 
respect to that facility, be subject to any fee or reporting 
requirements imposed by the Administrator of the Environmental 
Protection Agency in connection with reporting methane emissions 
pursuant to subpart W of part 98 of title 40, Code of Federal 
Regulations (or successor regulations).
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE v. JOE TALTON.

(Filed 10 October, 1945.)

Appeal by defendant from *Thompson, J.,*at March Criminal Term, 1945, Of JOHNSTON.

Criminal prosecution upon indictment charging defendant with tbe murder of one Dewey Daniels.

*771Verdict: Guilty of manslaughter.

Judgment: Imprisonment in the State’s Prison for a term of not less than five years, nor more than seven years.

Defendant appeals therefrom to Supreme Court and assigns error.

*Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant'Attorneys-General Rhodes, Moody, and Tucker for the State.*

*Wellons ■& Ganaday for defendant, appellant.*

Per Curiam.

All exceptions assigned as error on this appeal have been carefully considered. They present no new questions of law, and are without merit.

Hence, in the judgment below there is

No error.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 244 (Wednesday, December 20, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 65597]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30736]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Transit Administration

49 CFR Part 660

RIN 2132-AA54


Buy America Requirements; Removal

AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule removes the Buy America requirements which are now 
obsolete and have been superseded by 49 CFR part 661.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 20, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rita Daguillard, Deputy Assistant 
Chief Counsel, Office of Chief Counsel, room 9316, 400 Seventh Street, 
S.W., Washington, D.C. 20590, (202) 366-1936.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 401 of the Surface Transportation 
Assistance Act of 1978 (the 1978 STAA) (Public Law No. 95-599) included 
a Buy America provision applicable for the first time to the Federal 
Transit Administration ( FTA) program. This provision established a 
preference for products produced, mined or manufactured in the United 
States. The implementing regulation, 49 CFR part 660, applied these 
requirements to contracts exceeding $500,000 financed by funds 
obligated under the 1978 STAA.
    Both the statutory and funding authority of the 1978 STAA have now 
lapsed. FTA's current Buy America requirements are set out at 49 U.S.C. 
5323(j) and the implementing regulation, 49 CFR part 661. Because 49 
CFR part 660 is now obsolete, FTA finds that it is unnecessary to seek 
public comment on its removal from the Code of Federal Regulations. 
Part 660 is being removed as part of the President's ``Reinventing 
Government'' initiative.
    Accordingly, and effective December 20, 1995, FTA is removing 49 
CFR Part 660.

Regulatory Analyses and Notices

    This is not a significant rule under Executive Order 12866 or under 
the Department's Regulatory Policies and Procedures. It does not impose 
costs on regulated parties. It merely removes an obsolete regulation. 
There are not sufficient Federalism implications to warrant the 
preparation of a Federalism Assessment. The Department certifies that 
this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of small entities.

List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 660

    Grant programs--transportation, Mass transportation.

PART 660--[REMOVED]

    Accordingly, for the reasons set forth above, part 660 is hereby 
removed.
Gordon J. Linton,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 95-30736 Filed 12-20-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-57-U