alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 10-2743

___________ Sara Esther Ramos Vasquez, * * Petitioner, * * Petition for Review of v. * an Order of the Board * of Immigration Appeals. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Respondent. *

___________ Submitted: March 3, 2011 Filed: March 9, 2011

___________ Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Guatemalan citizen Sara Esther Ramos Va squez petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA ) affirming an immigration judge’s denial of her application for cancellation of remova l. We lack jurisdiction to review the discretionary determination that Ramos Va squez failed to show her removal would result in exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to her children who were United States citizens. See Zacarias-Velasquez v. Mukasey , 509 F.3d 429, 434 (8th Cir. 2007). We also lack jurisdiction to cons ider Ramos Vasquez’s assertion that the impact of her health problems was ignored , because she did not exhaust this issue before the BIA. See Sultani v. Gonzales , 455 F.3d 878, 884-85 (8th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, we dismiss the petition.

______________________________
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack,

 Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 

December 8, 2020

Order 

Clerk

December 8, 2020

148981(80)(81)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 148981

v COA: 319642

Muskegon CC: 12-062665-FH

PAUL J. BETTS, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

______________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Gratiot County Prosecutor to file a 

response to the brief amicus curiae of the American Civil Liberties Union of Michigan is 

GRANTED. The response submitted on October 5, 2020, is accepted for filing. On further 

order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the American Civil Liberties Union of Michigan 

to file a supplemental brief amicus curiae is GRANTED. The supplemental amicus brief 

submitted on October 6, 2020, is accepted for filing.
EXHIBIT 32


            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Raven Moon
Entertainment, Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the
period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Joey DiFrancesco, President, Chief Executive Officer and
principal financial officer of the Registrant, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Registrant.

Dated: August 14, 2007		/s/ Joseph DiFrancesco
				---------------------------
				Joey DiFrancesco, President,
				Chief Executive Officer and
				Principal Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 25 (Tuesday, February 7, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7167]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-2999]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

The Ohio State University, Notice of Decision on Application for 
Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instrument

    This decision is made pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, 
Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-
651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR 301). Related records can be viewed between 
8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in Room 4211, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 
and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C.
    Docket Number: 94-126. Applicant: The Ohio State University, 
Columbus, OH 43210. Instrument: Mass Spectrometer, Model 215-50. 
Manufacturer: Mass Analyser Products Limited, United Kingdom. Intended 
Use: See notice at 59 FR 59212, November 16, 1994.
    Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such 
purposes as it is intended to be used, is being manufactured in the 
United States. Reasons: The foreign instrument provides: (1) resolution 
to 600 daltons, (2) abundance sensitivity of less than 1 ppm of 
<SUP>40Ar detected at <SUP>39Ar with an analyzer pressure of 10<SUP>-7 
torr, (3) a background M/e=36 of less than 5x10<SUP>-14 cm<SUP>3 STP 
and (4) an adjustable Faraday collector for simultaneous ion 
collection.
    This capability is pertinent to the applicant's intended purposes 
and we know of no other instrument or apparatus of equivalent 
scientific value to the foreign instrument which is being manufactured 
in the United States.
Pamela Woods,
Acting Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. 95-2999 Filed 2-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-F
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 16 (Tuesday, January 26, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 4249]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-01395]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. chapter 35).
    Agency: U.S. Census Bureau.
    Title: Generic Clearance for 2020 Census Field Tests to Automate 
Field Data Collection Activities.
    OMB Control Number: 0607-0971.
    Form Number(s): TBD.
    Type of Request: Reinstatement, without change, of a previously 
approved collection for which approval has expired.
    Number of Respondents: 36,000.
    Average Hours per Response: 0.167.
    Burden Hours: 6000.
    Needs and Uses: All activities described directly support the 
Census Bureau's efforts to maintain or improve quality while 
controlling costs in the 2020 Census. The information collected from 
households during these tests is to research new technologies to plan 
the 2020 Census and motivating messages to encourage respondents to 
participate. The Census Bureau will not publish any tabulations or 
population estimates from the substantive results of tests conducted 
under this clearance. However, methodological papers may be written 
that include some tallies of response characteristics or problems, and 
responses may be used to inform future research studies building upon 
the results of these early tests.
    Affected Public: Individuals and households.
    Frequency: Once.
    Respondent's Obligation: Mandatory.
    Legal Authority: Title 13, Section 9.
    This information collection request may be viewed at 
www.reginfo.gov. Follow the instructions to view Department of Commerce 
collections currently under review by OMB.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bdf2f4effce2eec8dfd0d4ceced4d2d3fdd2d0df93d8d2cd93dad2cb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c18e8893809e92b4a3aca8b2b2a8aeaf81aeaca3efa4aeb1efa6aeb7">[email protected]</span></a> or fax to (202) 395-5806.

Sheleen Dumas,
Departmental PRA Lead, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016-01395 Filed 1-25-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-07-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 243 (Tuesday, December 19, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 65262]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30796]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[MA44-1-7167b; A-1-FRL-5314-7]


Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Massachusetts; Best Available Controls for Consumer and Commercial 
Products (including Architectural and Industrial Maintenance Coatings)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP) 
revision submitted by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. This revision 
establishes and requires VOC emission standards for architectural and 
industrial maintenance coatings and 10 categories of consumer products 
. In the Final Rules Section of this Federal Register, EPA is approving 
the State's SIP revision as a direct final rule without prior proposal 
because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial revision amendment 
and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the 
approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse comments 
are received in response to that direct final rule, no further activity 
is contemplated in relation to this proposed rule. If EPA receives 
adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all 
public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule 
based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment 
period on this proposal. Any parties interested in commenting on this 
proposal should do so at this time.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 18, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to Susan Studlien, Acting Director, 
Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, Region I, JFK Federal Bldg., Boston, MA 02203. 
Copies of the State submittal and EPA's technical support document are 
available for public inspection during normal business hours, by 
appointment at the Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region I, One Congress Street, 10th 
floor, Boston, MA and the Division of Air Quality Control, Department 
of Environmental Protection, One Winter Street, 8th Floor, Boston, MA 
02108.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeanne Cosgrove , (617) 565-3246.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information, see the direct 
final rule which is located in the Rules Section of this Federal 
Register.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q

    Dated: September 21, 1995.
John P. DeVillars,
Regional Administrator, EPA New England.
[FR Doc. 95-30796 Filed 12-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

SCOTT MICHAEL PATRICK,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 17

- 35867

D.C. Nos. 6:16

- cv

- 01218

- MC

6:98

- cr

- 60099

- MC

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael J. McShane, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 18 , 2019 * *

Before: CANBY

, TASHIMA , and CHRISTEN , Circuit Judges.

Federal prisoner Scott Michael Patrick appeals from the district court’s order

denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his sentence. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo, see United States v. R eves , 774 F.3d

562, 564 (9th Cir. 2014), and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

NOV 21 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 17

- 35867

Patrick contends that the district court improperly denied his section 2255

motion as untimely. He asserts that his section 2255 motion is timely because he

filed it within one year of Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015), a

decision which he contends applies to the mandatory career offender Sentencin g

Guidelines provision

, U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2

, under which he was sentenced. This

argument is foreclosed because “ Johnson did not recognize a new right applicable

to the mandatory Sentencing Guidelines on collateral review.” United States v.

Blackstone, 903 F .3d 1020, 1028 (9th Cir. 2018 ), cert. denied , 139 S. Ct. 2762

(2019). Contrary to Patrick’s argument, our decision in Blackstone is not “clearly

irreconcilable” with United States v. Davis , 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019 )

. See Miller v.

Gammie , 335 F.3d 889, 900 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). Accordingly, t he district

court properly concluded that section 2255(f)(3) does not apply and Patrick’s

motion is untimely. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f)( 1 ).

In light of this disposition, we do not reach the parties’ remaining

arguments.

The government’s motion for summary affirmance is denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3361 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3361

  To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to modify the definition of 
                 franchise fee, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 9, 2021

  Mr. Markey (for himself, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Schumer, Ms. Hirono, Mr. 
   Blumenthal, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Merkley, Mrs. Gillibrand, Mr. Van 
Hollen, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Murphy, Mr. Wyden, Mrs. Feinstein, Ms. Warren, 
and Mr. Cardin) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to modify the definition of 
                 franchise fee, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Community Television 
Act''.

SEC. 2. MODIFYING THE DEFINITION OF FRANCHISE FEE.

    Section 622(g)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 
542(g)(1)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``includes'' and inserting ``means''; and
            (2) by inserting ``other monetary'' before ``assessment''.
                                 <all>
```
#### E. W. ADDISON v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY.

(Filed 16 September, 1925.)

Appeal by defendant from *Crammer, J.,*at April Term, 1925, of Cuerituck.

Civil action to recover damages for an alleged negligent injury and killing of plaintiff’s livestock and turkeys by defendant’s engines and cars.

From a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff, tbe defendant appeals, assigning errors.

*W. L. Small for plaintiff. ■*

*Thompson & Wilson for defendant.*

Pee Cueiam.

Tbe controversy on trial narrowed itself to issues of fact, which tbe jury alone could determine. A careful perusal of tbe record leaves us with tbe impression that tbe case has been beard and determined substantially in agreement with tbe law bearing on tbe subject, and that tbe validity of tbe trial should be sustained. All matters in dispute have been settled by tbe verdict, and no action or ruling on tbe part of tbe trial court has been discovered by us which we apprehend should be held for reversible error.

His Honor properly ruled that tbe expression “any cattle or other livestock,” as used in C. S., 3482, was not applicable to turkeys or other fowls. *James v. R. R.,*166 N. C., 572.

Tbe verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 24 (Friday, February 5, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 6308]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02205]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and First-Class Package Service 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Effective date: February 5, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
February 1, 2016, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail & 
First-Class Package Service Contract 13 to Competitive Product List. 
Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2016-76, CP2016-
98.

Stanley F. Mires,
Attorney, Federal Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2016-02205 Filed 2-4-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
No. 1201, Misc.

#### Wilson *v.*Warden, Maryland Penitentiary.

Court of Appeals of Maryland. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Biomoda,  Inc.,
("the  Company")  for the  quarter  ended  June 30,  2006 as  filed  with  the
Securities  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  ("the  Report"),  I, John
Cousins,  Chief  Executive and Financial  Officer of the Company hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




                                 By: /s/John J. Cousins
                                     ------------------
                                     John J. Cousins
                                     Executive Vice President
                                     (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)

                                     August 14, 2006


   A signed original of this written statement required by section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
## Summary Measures and Graphs

- Individual Provisions
- Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable)

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						E1.1: Increase the payroll tax rate (currently 12.4 percent) to 16.2 percent in 2024 and later.**

|  |  |
|--|--|
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 1.62 2.76 45% 63%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

August 1, 2023

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Retirement Age

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: C2.5. Increase the normal retirement age (NRA) 3 months per year for those age 62 

starting in 2024 and ending in 2035 (NRA reaches 70 for those age 62 in 2035). Thereafter, index the NRA 

to maintain a constant ratio of expected retirement years (life expectancy at NRA) to potential work years 

(NRA minus 20). We assume the NRA will increase 1 month every 2 years. Also, increase the earliest 

eligibility age (EEA) from 62 to 64 at the same time the NRA increases from 67 to 69; that is, for those 

attaining age 62 in 2024 through 2031. Keep EEA at 64 thereafter.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision
## Summary Measures and Graphs

- Individual Provisions
- Level of Monthly Benefits

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						B1.4: Progressive price indexing (50th percentile) of PIA factors beginning with individuals newly eligible for OASDI benefits in 2030: Create a new bend point at the 50th percentile of the AIME distribution of newly retired workers. Maintain current-law benefits for earners at the 50th percentile and below. Reduce the 32 and 15 percent factors above the 50th percentile such that the initial benefit for a worker with AIME equal to the taxable maximum grows by inflation rather than the growth in the SSA average wage index.**

|  |  |
|--|--|
EX-35.1
Aurora Loan Services


Owner: None



Depositor: Structured Asset Securities Corporation
Attention: Mortgage Finance SARM 2007-1
745 7th Avenue, 7th Floor
New York, New York 10019

Master Servicer: Aurora Loan Services LLC
Michele Olds
10350 Park Meadows Drive
Littleton, CO 80124

Trustee: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Attention: Kimberly J. Wiggins / SARM 2007-1
49062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21046

Securities Admin



Subject: Annual Officer's Certification
Fiscal Year: 2007
Investor Code: H01
Investor Name: SARM 2007-1

I, Terry Gentry, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Aurora Loan
Services LLC (the "Servicer"), do certify the following for the Calendar Year
2007:

1. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period beginning on
the cut-off date and ending on December 31, 2007 (the reporting period) and of
its performance under the Agreement for such period has been made under my
supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material aspects
throughout such reporting period.



Certified by: AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC

By /s/ Terry L. Gentry
Name: Terry L. Gentry
Title: Managing Director