alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 24

                          POWERS OF ATTORNEY


     WHEREAS, CSB BANCORP, INC., an Ohio corporation (the
"Company"), proposes to file with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, pursuant to the provisions of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations thereunder,
an Annual Report to Shareholders on Form 10-K ("Form 10-K"), with
respect to the Company's 1998 fiscal year; and

     WHEREAS, the undersigned is [an Officer] [a Director] [a
Director and Officer] of the Company;

     NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned hereby constitutes and
appoints Douglas D. Akins [her] [his] attorney in fact, for [her]
[him] and in [her] [his] name, place and stead and in [her] [his]
office and capacity with the Company, to execute and file such
Form 10-K and exhibits, and thereafter to execute and file any
amended Form 10-K, hereby giving and granting to said attorney
full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and
thing whatsoever requisite and necessary to be done in and about
the premises as fully to all intents and purposes as [she] [he]
might or could do if personally present at the doing thereof,
hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney may or
shall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

     This authority hereby granted is limited to the execution and
delivery of such Form 10-K or amendment thereto, unless earlier
revoked by me or expressly extended by me in writing, shall remain
in force and effective only until such Form 10-K or any amendment
thereto is filed.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set [her]
[his] hand this _____ day of March 1999.



                              _________________________________
EXHIBIT 32.1

       CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NASB Financial, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, David H. Hancock, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.


February 9, 2009           By: /s/ David H. Hancock
                               David H. Hancock
                               Chairman and Chief
                                 Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to NASB Financial, Inc. and will be retained by NASB
Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.


This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for
any other purpose.

<Page>
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 -0.17 -0.24 -5% -6%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

September 15, 2023

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Level of Monthly Benefits

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: B5.2. Beginning for those newly eligible in 2024, reconfigure the special minimum 

benefit: (a) A year of coverage is defined as a year in which 4 quarters of coverage are earned. (b) At 

implementation, set the PIA for 30 years of coverage equal to 125 percent of the monthly poverty level 

(about $1,416 in 2022). For those with under 30 years of coverage, the PIA per year of coverage over 10 

years is $1,416/20 = $70.80. (c) Index the initial PIA per year of coverage by wage growth for successive 

cohorts.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 4 (Friday, January 6, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 2159]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-337]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Electrical and Communications Systems; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Electrical and Communications 
Systems (#1196)
    Date and Time: January 23-24, 1995--8:00 am to 5:00 pm
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 
630, Arlington, Virginia 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed
    Contact Person: Dr. Albert B. Harvey, Program Director, ECS, 
Room 675, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, 
VA. Telephone: (703) 306-1339.
    Purpose of meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate applications of Faculty Early 
Career Development (CAREER) research proposals.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4) and 
(6) of the Government Sunshine Act.

    Dated: January 3, 1995.
[FR Doc. 95-337 Filed 1-5-95; 8:45 am]
BILLIND CODE 7555-01-M
exv4w37






Exhibit 4.37




Second Amendment 

To The

Savings & Profit Sharing Plan for Employees of

First Interstate BancSystem, Inc.




          1. Recitals. Section 15.1 of the Savings & Profit Sharing Plan for Employees of First
Interstate BancSystem, Inc. (the “Plan”) gives First Interstate BancSystem, Inc., as the Plan
Sponsor, the right to amend the Plan at any time. The Board of Directors of the Plan Sponsor
delegated authority to the FIBS Benefits Committee (the “Committee”) to take any action with
respect to the Plan to the extent that such action does not result in additional funding
obligations for the Plan Sponsor. The Committee hereby amends the Plan to change the maximum
investment in stock.




          2. Amendment of Plan. The following Amendment to the Plan is adopted effective
July 17, 2009, which is the date the Committee met and approved the amendment to the Plan.





	 	(A)	 	Subparagraph (d) of Section 10.2 shall be amended to read in its entirety as follows:






	 	(d)	 	Maximum Investment in Stock Fund. Effective as of July 17,
2009, the maximum investment in the Stock Fund by each Participant shall, at
the time of the Participant’s election, in no event exceed 10% of the
Participant’s Account balance. Participants who are invested in the Stock Fund
in excess of the 10% maximum limit as of July 17, 2009, may continue to hold
the amount of Stock in excess of the 10% maximum after July 17, 2009, but shall
not be eligible to purchase additional shares of Stock unless and until their
investment in the Stock Fund is less than 10%.





          3. Other Provisions. All other provisions of the Plan shall remain unamended and in
full force.




          4. Authorized to Sign. The Committee has delegated authority to Ramona Doll, a member
of the Committee, to execute any and all amendments approved by the Committee.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	 /s/ RAMONA DOLL
 

Ramona Doll
	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Date:
	 	 August 6, 2009	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 

	 	 






			
	 	 	 
	Second Amendment to the Savings & Profit Sharing Plan for Employees of First Interstate BancSystem, Inc.
	 	7/2009   1
	Prepared by Holland & Hart LLP
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Florida Banks, Inc.
(the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, T.
Edwin Stinson, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. Date: May 14, 2004 By:
    /s/ T. Edwin Stinson, Jr.T. Edwin Stinson, Jr.Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 31.2  CERTIFICATION   I, Kathleen E.
Donovan, certify that:  1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Dendrite International, Inc.;  2. Based on
my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The
registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a) Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The
registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and  b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.   Dated:
  March 15, 2004By:
  KATHLEEN E. DONOVANKathleen E. DonovanSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [ER-FRL-9025-4]

*Responsible Agency:*                     Office of Federal Activities, General Information (202) 564-7146 or                     *http://www2.epa.gov/​compliance/​nepa/​.*

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EISs).

Filed 01/25/2016 Through 01/29/2016.

Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

## Notice

                    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment letters on EISs are available at:                     *http://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/​cdx-nepa-public/​action/​eis/​search.*

*EIS No. 20160022, Draft, USFS, OR,*                     Magone Project, Comment Period Ends: 03/21/2016, Contact: Sasha Fertig 541-575-3061                

*EIS No. 20160023, Draft, FHWA, UT,*                     I-80 and State Street Interchange, Comment Period Ends: 03/21/2016, Contact: Bryan Dillon 801-955-3517                

*EIS No. 20160024, Draft, USA, AZ,*                     Proposed Tailings Storage Facility, Ray Mine, Comment Period Ends: 03/21/ 2016, Contact: Michael Langley 602-230-6953                

*EIS No. 20160025, Final, USFS, MT,*                     North and West Big Hole Allotment Management Plans, Review Period Ends: 03/07/2016, Contact: Jessica Dhaemers 406-689-3243                

*EIS No. 20160026, Draft, USFS, CO,*                     Arapahoe Basin Ski Area Projects, Comment Period Ends: 03/21/2016, Contact: Matthew Ehrman 970-945-3212                

*EIS No. 20160027, Final, USFS, MT,*                     Blackfoot Travel Plan (Non-Winter), Review Period Ends: 03/07/2016, Contact: Erin Fryer 406-495-3863                

Dated: February 2, 2016.

Dawn Roberts,

Management Analyst, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 2016-02270 Filed 2-4-16; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3556 

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to modify certain regulations relating to the requirements for commercial driver’s license testing and commercial learner’s permit holders, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2022 

Ms. LUMMIS (for herself and Mr. KELLY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 

Transportation 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to modify certain 

regulations relating to the requirements for commercial 

driver’s license testing and commercial learner’s permit 

holders, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Licensing Individual 

5 Commercial Exam-takers Now Safely and Efficiently Act 

6 of 2022’’ or the ‘‘LICENSE Act of 2022’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3556 IS

1 SEC. 2. MODIFICATIONS TO CERTAIN COMMERCIAL DRIV2 ER’S LICENSE REGULATIONS. 

3 Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment 

4 of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation, acting 

5 through the Administrator of the Federal Motor Carrier 

6 Safety Administration, shall— 

7 (1) revise section 384.228 of title 49, Code of 

8 Federal Regulations (or a successor regulation), to 

9 allow a State or third-party examiner to administer 

10 a commercial driver’s license knowledge test only if 

11 the examiner— 

12 (A) maintains a valid commercial driver’s 

13 license test examiner certification; 

14 (B) completes a commercial driver’s license 

15 skills test examiner training course that meets 

16 the requirements of subsection (d) of that sec17 tion; and 

18 (C) completes 1 unit of instruction de19 scribed in subsection (c)(3) of that section; 

20 (2) revise section 383.25(a)(1) of title 49, Code 

21 of Federal Regulations (or a successor regulation), 

22 to allow a commercial driver’s license holder accom23 panying a commercial learner’s permit holder to be 

24 present anywhere in the cab of the vehicle being op25 erated by the commercial learner’s permit holder; 

26 and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3556 IS

1 (3) revise section 383.79 of title 49, Code of 

2 Federal Regulations (or a successor regulation), to 

3 allow a State to administer a driving skills test to 

4 any commercial driver’s license applicant, regardless 

5 of the State of domicile of the applicant or where the 

6 applicant received driver training. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-90,156-01

EX PARTE GILBERT VASQUEZ, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 20070D02841-120-1 IN THE 120 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM EL PASO COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. The Eighth Court

of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Vasquez v. State, No. 08-07-00247-CR (Tex. App.—El Paso

Mar. 20, 2010) (not designated for publication). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas

corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. SeeTEX. CODE

CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends, among other things, that trial counsel was ineffective at the punishment

phase of trial because he did not investigate and present mitigation evidence. He also raises claims

ofineffective assistance relating to counsel’s performance during the guilt phase. Based on the record,

the trial court has determined that trial counsel’s performance at the punishment phase was deficient
2

and that Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court has found that counsel was not ineffective during

the guilt phase of trial. We agree with the trial court’sfindings and base our decision adjudicating the

claims raised in Applicant’s habeas corpus application on the trial court’s findings and this Court’s

independent review of the entire record.

Relief is denied on Applicant’s claims relating to the validity of his conviction. Relief is

granted on Applicant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel at punishment. Strickland v.

Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). The sentence in cause number 20070D02841 in the 120 District th

Court of El Paso County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of El

Paso County for a new punishment hearing. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench warrant

within ten days from the date of this Court’s mandate.

Copies ofthis opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department ofCriminalJustice–Correctional

Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

Delivered: January 27, 2021

Do not publish
#### BOARD OF EDUCATION OF GRAHAM COUNTY v. D. ANDERSON and S. A. CRISP.

(Filed 19 December, 1930.)

Judgments P c — Judgment in this case held erroneous as being inconsistent.

Where the county board of education orders the removal of school committeemen, C. S., 5458, who appeal under the provisions of C. S., 5427, the judgment of the Superior Court judge holding the act of the board of education in removing the committeemen invalid and dismissing the appeal for want of jurisdiction is inconsistent and erroneous.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Hanvood, Special Judge,*at September Term, 1930, of Graham.

Proceeding to remove D. Anderson and S. A. Crisp as school committeemen of Yellow Creek Township, Graham County, for cause under 3 C. S., 5458.

From an order of removal made by the county board of education of Graham County, the said committeemen appealed to the Superior Court, asserting their right to do so under 3 C. S., 5427.

*58From a judgment dismissing the appeal for want of jurisdiction, but bolding that the action of the board of education in removing said committeemen, was invalid and without force and effect, the board of education of Graham County appeals, assigning error.

*Dillard & Hill for plaintiff.*

*B. L. Phillips for defendants.*

Stacy, C. J.

There was error in dismissing the appeal for want of jurisdiction, and at the same time holding that the order of removal made by the board of education was void. The two rulings would seem to be inconsistent.

Error.
### Proposed Provision: E3.13. Beginning in 2031, apply 2 percent payroll tax rate on earnings over the wage-indexed equivalent of $400,000 in 2017 (about $696,600 in 2031), with the threshold wage-indexed after 2031. Do not provide benefit credit for additional earnings taxed.
#### In re Custody of PATRICIA DIXON and MICHAEL DIXON, Minors.

(Filed 21 September, 1955.)

Appeal by petitioner from *Nettles, J.,*in Chambers, Asheville, N. C., June 1955.

*Ward & Bennett for Petitioner, Appellant.*

*Geo. Pennell for Respondent, Appellee.*

PeR CüRIAm.

Upon the petition of Vincent Joseph Dixon, writ of *habeas corpus*issued to bring before the court his two children, Patricia Dixon and Michael Dixon, aged eleven and eight, respectively, now residing with their mother, petitioner’s wife, Juanita Runion Dixon, for the determination of the custody of these children. Petitioner and his wife are separated but not divorced.

Upon return of the writ the matter was fully heard by Judge Nettles, both petitioner and his wife introducing numerous affidavits. After hearing all the evidence Judge Nettles therefrom made findings of fact, and thereupon ordered that the custody of said children be awarded the mother, with right of petitioner to have the children for two months during school vacation and alternately on holidays. The cause was ordered retained for further orders as to the custody of the children. Petitioner appealed.

The facts found by the judge are supported by the evidence and they sustain the judgment entered.

This was a matter for the determination of the presiding judge who in this instance is the resident judge of the District. His judgment will not be disturbed.

Affirmed.

WinboRNe and HiggiNS, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in  Registration  Statement  No.
333-35580 of E Com Ventures,  Inc. on Form S-3 and  Registration  Statements No.
333-30882  and No.  333-70608  on Forms S-8 of our report  dated  April 18, 2003
included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of E-Com Ventures,  Inc. for the year
ended February 1, 2003.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Miami, Florida
August 27, 2003





                                       6