alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Proposed Provision: B7.11. Beginning in January 2026, eliminate the retirement earnings test for all beneficiaries under normal retirement age, including retired workers, aged spouses, aged widow(er)s, young spouses with a child in care, young surviving spouses with a child in care, and children.
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 23 (Thursday, February 4, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 6055]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02083]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Notice of Meetings; Proposal Review

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces its 
intent to hold proposal review meetings throughout the year. The 
purpose of these meetings is to provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to the NSF for financial support. The 
agenda for each of these meetings is to review and evaluate proposals 
as part of the selection process for awards. The review and evaluation 
may also include assessment of the progress of awarded proposals. The 
majority of these meetings will take place at NSF, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, Virginia 22230.
    These meetings will be closed to the public. The proposals being 
reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, 
including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) 
of the Government in the Sunshine Act. NSF will continue to review the 
agenda and merits of each meeting for overall compliance of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act.
    These closed proposal review meetings will not be announced on an 
individual basis in the Federal Register. NSF intends to publish a 
notice similar to this on a quarterly basis. For an advance listing of 
the closed proposal review meetings that include the names of the 
proposal review panel and the time, date, place, and any information on 
changes, corrections, or cancellations, please visit the NSF Web site: 
http://www.nsf.gov/events/. This information may also be requested by 
telephoning, 703/292-8687.

    Dated: February 1, 2016.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016-02083 Filed 2-3-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION

The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:

(1)  The accompanying Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
period ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the accompanying Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                    |  |  |                         | 
|------------------- |  |  | ----------------------- | 
|Date: July 28, 2003 |  |  | /s/ Greg H. Guettler    | 
|                    |  |  |                         | 
|                    |  |  | President               | 
|                    |  |  |                         | 
|                    |  |  |                         | 
|Date: July 28, 2003 |  |  | /s/ James S. Murphy     | 
|                    |  |  |                         | 
|                    |  |  | Chief Financial Officer | 

25
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4248-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2016-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Mississippi (FEMA-4248-DR), dated January 4, 2016, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective date:*                         January 22, 2016.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Mississippi is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of January 4, 2016.

Monroe and Prentiss Counties for Individual Assistance and Public Assistance. 

Panola County for Individual Assistance (already designated for Public Assistance).

Clay, Itawamba, and Tallahatchie Counties for Public Assistance.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate, 

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2016-02027 Filed 2-3-16; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

ROSE MARIE DAVIS,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 18

- 10171

D.C. No. 2:17

- cr

- 00272

- JAD

CWH

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Jennifer A. Dorsey, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 15, 2019 **

Before: SCHROEDER, S ILVERMAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Rose Marie Davis appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges

her guilty

- plea conviction s and aggregate 34

- month sentence for mail theft, in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1708; using or trafficking in an unauthorized access

devi ce, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(2)

, (c)(1)(A)(i); and aggravated identity

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUL 18 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 18

- 10171

theft , in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028A(a)(1). Pursuant to Anders v. California

,

386 U.S. 738 (1967), Davis ’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no

grounds fo r relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have

provided Davis the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se

supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Davis waived the right to appeal her conviction and sentence. Our

independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80

(1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United

States v. Watson , 582 F.3d 974, 986

- 88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismi ss

the appeal. See id. at 988.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.
### Proposed Provision: B5.8. Beginning in 2028, create a Basic Minimum Benefit (BMB) within Social Security (i.e., the cost of the BMB would be charged as a cost to the OASI Trust Fund), with the following specifications: (1) Eligibility for the BMB would be limited to OASI beneficiaries who have attained normal retirement age (NRA) or above. OASI beneficiaries under NRA would not be eligible for the BMB. (2) The BMB would be calculated on a household basis and split equally between members of the household. In the case of a married couple, both spouses would need to claim any Social Security benefits for which they are eligible before they could receive the BMB. If both spouses have claimed and one is NRA or above and the other has not yet attained NRA, only the half of the BMB for the spouse over NRA would be payable. (3) The BMB amount for single beneficiaries would be equal to either: 1) the BMB base ($604 in 2015) - 0.70 * current monthly OASI benefit (not including any BMB), if positive; or 2) zero. (4) The BMB amount for married beneficiaries would be equal to either: 1) the BMB base ($906 in 2015) - 0.70 * total household monthly OASI benefits (not including any BMB), if positive; or 2) zero. (5) The BMB bases for singles and couples would be updated annually for changes in the average wage index (AWI). (6) Single filers with Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) over $30,000 and joint filers with AGI (including taxable SS benefits) over $45,000 would be subject to clawback of the BMB through the income tax system. Any BMB would be reduced by one dollar for every dollar of income above the thresholds. (Thresholds, in 2015 dollars, would be indexed to chained CPI-U.) Clawbacks would be credited back to the OASI Trust Fund.

back
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 23 (Thursday, February 4, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 6105]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02038]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Foreign Assets Control


Sanctions Actions Pursuant to Executive Orders 13224

AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control 
(OFAC) is publishing the names of 2 individuals and 1 entity whose 
property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to Executive 
Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, ``Blocking Property and Prohibiting 
Transactions With Persons Who Commit, Threaten To Commit, or Support 
Terrorism.''

DATES: OFAC's actions described in this notice are effective on January 
28, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Associate Director for Global 
Targeting, tel.: 202/622-2420, Assistant Director for Sanctions 
Compliance & Evaluation, tel.: 202/622-2490, Assistant Director for 
Licensing, tel.: 202/622-2480, Office of Foreign Assets Control, or 
Chief Counsel (Foreign Assets Control), tel.: 202/622-2410, Office of 
the General Counsel, Department of the Treasury (not toll free 
numbers).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Electronic and Facsimile Availability

    The SDN List and additional information concerning OFAC sanctions 
programs are available from OFAC's Web site (www.treas.gov/ofac). 
Certain general information pertaining to OFAC's sanctions programs is 
also available via facsimile through a 24-hour fax-on-demand service, 
tel.: 202/622-0077.

Notice of OFAC Actions

    On January 28, 2016, OFAC blocked the property and interests in 
property of the following 2 individuals and 1 entity pursuant to E.O. 
13224, ``Blocking Property and Prohibiting Transactions With Persons 
Who Commit, Threaten To Commit, or Support Terrorism'':

Individuals

    1. NOUREDDINE, Mohamad (a.k.a. NUR-AL-DIN, Muhammad Mustafa); 
DOB 23 Oct 1974; POB Beirut, Lebanon; nationality Lebanon; Gender 
Male; Passport RL0629138 (Lebanon) (individual) [SDGT] (Linked To: 
HIZBALLAH).
    2. ZAHER EL DINE, Hamdi (a.k.a. ZAHREDDINE, Hamdi); DOB 20 Jul 
1984; nationality Lebanon; Gender Male; Passport RL2146270 (Lebanon) 
(individual) [SDGT] (Linked To: HIZBALLAH).

Entity

    1. TRADE POINT INTERNATIONAL S.A.R.L., 3rd Floor, Gulf Building, 
Block B, Hafez Al Asad Street, Airport Highway, Bir Hassan, Beirut, 
Lebanon; Gulf Building, 3rd Floor, Hafiz Al Asad Autostrade, 
Ghobeiri, Baabda, Lebanon; Registration ID 2020615 [SDGT] (Linked 
To: NOUREDDINE, Mohamad).

    Dated: January 28, 2016.
John E. Smith,
Acting Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control.
[FR Doc. 2016-02038 Filed 2-3-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Unify Corporation (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven D. Bonham, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), that, to the best of my knowledge:

| (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of   Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.   78m); and                                                    |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                          |
| (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,   in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations   of the Company for the period covered by the Report. |

| July 26, 2006 |                      |
|---------------|---------------------------|
|          | /s/ STEVEN D. BONHAM      |
|          |                           |
|          | Steven D. Bonham          |
|          | *Chief Financial Officer* |

          *A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certificationaccompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 and shall not, except tothe extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by theCompany for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended.*
Exhibit 12.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Michael
C. Jay, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Intertape Polymer Group Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The
Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures [as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)] and internal control over financial reporting [as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)] for the Company and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Designed such internal control over financing
reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
Companys internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 20, 2014



/s/ Michael C. JayMichael C. Jay,Interim Chief Financial Officer
#### Hank JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. Hayden J. DEES, Warden, Dixon Correctional Institute, Respondent.

No. 78-8318.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 10, 1978.

Hank Johnson, pro se.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen. of Louisiana, C. D., New Orleans, La., Barbara B. Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., New Orleans,

La., Brian G. Meissner, New Orleans, La., for respondent.

Before GEE, TJOFLAT and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Johnson appeals the denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, claiming that his guilty plea to a Louisiana court was involuntary because he was not informed of one possible consequence of it. Though he was advised of the maximum sentence (20 years) and sentenced to eight, he was not advised that as a multiple, serious offender he might be denied time off for good behavior. Subsequent to the plea the state moved the court to deny him such credit, and the court so ordered.

Our opinion in *Moore v. Hinton,*513 F.2d 781, 782 (1975), noted:

> Numerous cases establish that defendants need not be informed of such collateral consequences in order to voluntarily and intelligently plead guilty. In *Meaton v. United States,*328 F.2d 379 (5th Cir. 1964) for example, this court rejected the contention that appellant should be allowed to withdraw his guilty plea to a mail fraud charge because he had not been informed that, as a convicted felon, he would automatically forfeit his rights to vote and to travel abroad. In *Waddy v. Davis,*445 F.2d 1, 3 (5th Cir. 1971) this court held that appellants were not entitled, before pleading guilty to a crime of “moral turpitude,” to be informed that if they did so plead, they would automatically be struck from the local voting rolls;

> *1167“[T]he loss of franchise is a result of the conviction, not the plea.” *Cf. Trujillo v. United States,*377 F.2d 266 (5th Cir. 1967) (defendant need not be informed, before pleading guilty, that he will not be eligible for parole under the mandatory sentence to be imposed). Courts have also held that defendants are not entitled to be informed that a likely consequence of a guilty plea is deportation, *United States v. Parrino,*212 F.2d 919 (2nd Cir. 1954) or an undesirable discharge from the armed forces, *Redwine*v. *Zuckert,*115 U.S.App.D.C. 130, 317 F.2d 336 (1963). We therefore likewise hold that a defendant need not be informed, before pleading guilty to a charge of driving while intoxicated, that as a collateral consequence of his conviction, his driver’s license will be suspended.

We conclude, like the failure in *Trujillo,*supra, to inform a pleader that he will not be eligible for parole, the failure to inform Johnson that he could be denied “good time” concerned such a collateral consequence.1

AFFIRMED.

1

. It is appropriate to dispose of this case summarily. See *Groendyke Transportation, Inc. v. Davis,*5 Cir., 1969, 406 F.2d 1158.
Skip to main content

# Social Security

Search
Menu
Español
Sign in

## Contribution and Benefit Base

**Contribution and benefit bases, 1937-2024**YearAmount1937-50$3,0001951-543,6001955-584,2001959-654,8001966-676,6001968-717,80019729,000197310,800197413,200197514,100197615,300197716,500197817,700197922,900198025,900198129,700198232,400198335,700198437,800198539,600YearAmount1986$42,000198743,800198845,000198948,000199051,300199153,400199255,500199357,600199460,600199561,200199662,700199765,400199868,400199972,600200076,200200180,400200284,900200387,000200487,900200590,000YearAmount2006$94,200200797,5002008102,0002009106,8002010106,8002011106,8002012110,1002013113,7002014117,0002015118,5002016118,5002017127,2002018128,4002019132,9002020137,7002021142,8002022147,0002023160,2002024168,600Note:  Amounts for 1937-74 and for 1979-81 were set by statute; all other amounts were determined under automatic adjustment provisions of the Social Security Act.

Footer menu
<PAGE>

        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NewCom International, Inc., a
Delaware corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June
30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Walter Grieves, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

         1.       The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information  contained in the report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Walter Grieves
----------------------------------------
Walter Grieves, Chief Executive Officer
October 23, 2003