alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
LOGO

|                                                         |  |                                                                                                                                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm |  | Raymond Chabot Grant ThorntonLLP
Suite 2000 National Bank Tower 600 De La Gauchetière Street West
Montreal, Québec H3B 4L8 
Telephone: 514-878-2691 Fax: 514-878-2127 www.rcgt.com

We have issued our reports dated March 6, 2012, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and internal
control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Intertape Polymer Group Inc. on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011.

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Intertape Polymer Group Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-67732, effective August 16, 2001; File No.
333-97961, effective August 12, 2002; File No. 333-108077, effective August 19, 2003, File No. 333-114954 effective April 28, 2004; File No. 3333-89763 effective October 27, 1999; File No. 333-114960 effective April 28, 2004; and File No. 333-135599
effective July 5, 2006).





LOGO

Montreal, Canada

March 7, 2012





|1 | Chartered accountant auditor permit no. 20154
|- | ---------------------------------------------
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,	<br>	<br>against<br><br>Muhammad Terry, Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><party role="defendant&lt;Body&gt;&lt;P&gt;">Appellate Advocates (Dina Zloczower of counsel), for appellant.Kings County District Attorney (Leonard Joblove and Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel), for respondent.<p>Appeal by defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Andrew S. Borrok, J.), imposed November 9, 2015, upon his conviction of criminal contempt in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty.</p><p>ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.</p><p>On July 23, 2015, the People charged defendant, in a felony complaint, with two counts of criminal contempt in the first degree (Penal Law ยง 215.51 [b] [v], [vi]), criminal contempt in the second degree (Penal Law ยง 215.50 [3]), endangering the welfare of a child (Penal Law ยง 260.10 [1]), attempted assault in the third degree (Penal Law ยงยง 110.00, 120.00 [1]), menacing in the third degree (Penal Law ยง 120.15), and harassment in the second degree (Penal Law ยง 240.26 [1]). The charges resulted from a physical encounter defendant had had with his nephew, which had violated the terms of an order of protection that had been issued against defendant on his nephew's behalf. On November 9, 2015, pursuant to a negotiated plea and sentencing agreement, defendant, assisted by counsel, pleaded guilty to criminal contempt in the second degree in satisfaction of the accusatory instrument, waived the right to appeal, and was sentenced to three years' probation. As limited by his brief, defendant appeals from the sentence, arguing that the sentence of probation is excessive and should be reduced.</p><p>Upon our review of defendant's responses to the court's questions during the plea colloquy and the text of the written appeal waiver form executed by defendant, his counsel, and the court, we find that defendant validly waived his right to appeal (<i>see People v Bryant</i>, 28 NY3d 1094, 1096 [2016]). Such a waiver precludes appellate review of claims that a sentence is excessive (<a href="../2018/2018_01085.htm" target="_blank"><i>People v Sarner</i>, 158 AD3d 729</a> [2018]; <a href="../2017/2017_09163.htm" target="_blank"><i>People v McLeggan</i>, 156 AD3d 903</a>, 903 [2017]).</p><p>Accordingly, the sentence is affirmed. </p><p>PESCE, P.J., WESTON and ALIOTTA, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: April 13, 2018<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></party></partyblock>
EXHIBIT 31.1

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Michael W. Katz, certify that:

      (1)   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of E Com Ventures,
            Inc.;

      (2)   Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain any
            untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
            necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
            under which such  statements  were made, not misleading with respect
            to the period covered by this annual report.


Date: May 24, 2006


By:  /S/ MICHAEL W. KATZ
   ----------------------------------
Michael W. Katz
President and Chief Executive Officer



                                       13
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 10.8(a)

                                  AMENDMENT - I
                           BELDEN & BLAKE CORPORATION
                             1999 SEVERANCE PAY PLAN
                                  MAY 29, 2000

         Effective May 29, 2000, the Belden & Blake Corporation 1999 Severance
Pay Plan is hereby amended to read:

         Section 2.1 Applicable Period. The term "Applicable Period" shall mean
a period equal to two (2) weeks for each year of service (not less than 4 weeks
or more than 26 weeks) with the Company, unless an Eligible Employee is notified
in writing that his or her Applicable Period shall consist of a different
period. For this purpose, years of service with the Company shall be based on
the total number of years and fractional years of continuous service with the
Company from the Eligible Employee's most recent date of hire with the Company.
For purposes of the preceding sentence, continuous service shall also include
periods of employment with an entity or affiliate thereof acquired by the
Company or with any entity or affiliate thereof from which the Company acquired
assets that occurred immediately preceding the Eligible Employee's date of hire
with the Company.

         All other aspects of the Plan remain unchanged and are reaffirmed.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Belden & Blake Corporation has caused this
amendment to the Plan to be executed as of the 29th day of May, 2000.

ATTEST:                             BELDEN & BLAKE CORPORATION

/s/ Joe Vitale                      By: /s/ John L. Schwager
---------------------------             --------------------------------------
Secretary                                   John L. Schwager
                                    Title: President & Chief Executive Officer
#### Peter Bowe, Respondent, v. United States Reflector Company, Appellant.

Judgment reversed, judgment ordered for defendant, with leave to amend on the usual terms. Opinion by

Daniels, J.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

                    The National Science Board (NSB), pursuant to National Science Foundation (NSF) regulations (45 CFR part 614), the National Science Foundation Act, as amended, (42 U.S.C. 1862n-5), and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice of a cancellation of one session and the addition of an agenda item in a plenary session during the National Science Board meetings on February 2-3, 2016, as shown below. The original notice appeared in the                     **Federal Register**                     on January 29, 2016 at 81 FR 70259.                

# Cancelled Session:

## Plenary Board Meeting

### Open Session: 11:30-11:45 a.m.

NSB Chair's remarks

Guest speaker—Senator Gary Peters

NSB Chair's closing remarks

# Amended Agenda:

## Plenary Board Meeting

### Open Session: 1:00-1:30 p.m.

NSB Chair's remarks

NSF Director's remarks

Approval of open plenary minutes for November 2015

NEON update from the Chair of the ad hoc task force on NEON Performance and Plans

Open committee reports

Possible Board Vote on SEI's Recommendations, including draft Companion Brief and sense of the Board Statement on the Value of Higher Education [ADDED]

NSB Chair's closing remarks

# UPDATES: 

                        Please refer to the National Science Board Web site for additional information. Meeting information and schedule updates (time, place, subject matter or status of meeting) may be found at                         *http://www.nsf.gov/​nsb/​meetings/​notices.jsp.*

# AGENCY CONTACT: 

                        Ron Campbell,                         *jrcampbe@nsf.gov,*                         703-292-7000.                    

Kyscha Slater-Williams,

Program Specialist, National Science Board.

[FR Doc. 2016-02015 Filed 1-29-16; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 9, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 6856]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02507]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 14276-002-Kentucky; Kentucky River Lock and Dam No. 11 
Hydroelectric Project]


 FFP Project 92, LLC; Notice of Revised Restricted Service List

    Rule 2010 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's 
(Commission) Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.2010, provides 
that, to eliminate unnecessary expense or improve administrative 
efficiency, the Secretary may establish a restricted service list for a 
particular phase or issue in a proceeding. The restricted service list 
should contain the names of persons on the service list who, in the 
judgment of the decisional authority establishing the list, are active 
participants with respect to the phase or issue in the proceeding for 
which the list is established.
    The Commission staff is consulting with the Kentucky State Historic 
Preservation Officer and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation 
(Advisory Council) pursuant to the Advisory Council's regulations, 36 
CFR part 800, implementing section 106 of the National Historic 
Preservation Act, as amended, (54 U.S.C. 306108), to prepare a 
Programmatic Agreement for managing properties included in, or eligible 
for inclusion in, the National Register of Historic Places at the 
proposed Kentucky River Lock and Dam No. 11 Hydroelectric Project.
    On September 30, 2015, Commission staff established a restricted 
service list for the Kentucky River Lock and Dam No. 11 Hydroelectric 
Project. Since that time, changes have occurred and therefore, the 
restricted service list is revised as follows:
    Replace ``Lisa C. Baker, Acting THPO, United Keetoowah Band of 
Cherokee Indians in Oklahoma'' with ``Assistant Chief Joe Bunch, or 
Representative, United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians in 
Oklahoma.''

    Dated: February 3, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-02507 Filed 2-8-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### STATE v. FRED THOMAS MILLS.

(Filed 21 September, 1955.)

Constitutional Law § 32: Criminal Law § 56—

On appeal from conviction in a county court on a warrant charging possession of whiskey for the purpose of sale, the warrant was amended to charge also possession of nontax-paid liquor, and defendant was convicted on this count alone. The judgment is arrested on authority of *8. v. Sail,*240 N.C. 109.

Winbokne and Higgins, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

*605Appeal by defendant from *Bless, J.,*at June Term 1955, of McDowell.

*Attorney-General Rodman, Assistant Attorney-General Love, and Lewis Bulwinkle, Member of Staff, for the State.*

*I. C. Crawford and Lawrence C. Stoker for defendant, appellant.*

Pee CuRiam.

The defendant was tried, in the McDowell County Criminal Court on a warrant charging possession of whiskey for the purpose of sale. From conviction and judgment in that court the defendant appealed to the Superior Court. When the case was called for trial in the Superior Court, on motion of the Solicitor, the warrant was amended to charge also unlawful possession of nontax-paid liquor. This was treated as a second count in the warrant. The jury returned verdict of guilty of illegal possession of intoxicating liquor. No verdict was rendered as to the original count. From judgment on the verdict the defendant appealed.

Defendant’s motion in arrest of judgment must be allowed for the reasons set out in *S. v. Hall,*240 N.C. 109, 81 S.E. 2d 189, and cases there cited.

Judgment arrested.

Winborne and HiggiNS, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
| 2004 OASDI Trustees Report |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|----------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--|
|                            |

### LIST OF FIGURES

 II. OVERVIEW

II.D1 Short-Range OASDI Trust Fund Ratios

II.D2 OASDI Income and Cost Rates Under Intermediate Assumptions

II.D3 Number of Covered Workers Per OASDI Beneficiary

II.D4 Cumulative OASDI Income Less Cost, Based on Present Law Tax Rates and Scheduled Benefits

II.D5 OASDI Cost as a Percentage of GDP

II.D6 OASDI Annual Income Less Cost as Percent of Taxable Payroll 2003 and 2004 Trustees Reports

II.D7 Long-Range OASDI Trust Fund Ratios Under Alternative Assumptions

 IV. ACTUARIAL ESTIMATES

IV.A1 Short-Range OASI and DI Trust Fund Ratios

IV.B1 Long-Range OASI and DI Annual Income Rates and Cost Rates

IV.B2 Number of OASDI Beneficiaries Per 100 Covered Workers

IV.B3 Long-Range OASI and DI Trust Fund Ratios

IV.B4 Long-Range Test of Close Actuarial Balance

IV.B5 OASDI Annual Balances: 2003 and 2004 Reports

 V. ASSUMPTIONS AND METHODS UNDERLYING ACTUARIAL ESTIMATES

V.C1 Primary-Insurance-Amount Formula for the 2004 Cohort

V.C2 Maximum-Family-Benefit Formula for the 2004 Cohort

V.C3 DI Disabled Worker Incidence Rates, 1970-2013

 VI. APPENDICES

VI.E1 Annual Trust Fund Ratios

VI.E2 Annual Cost Rates

VI.F1 Estimated OASDI Income and Cost in Constant Dollars, Based on Intermediate Assumptions

----

|  |  |  |  |  |  |   |
|--|--|--|--|--|--|--------|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy        | Website Policies & Other Important Information        | Site Map        | Actuarial Publications | 3/23/2004 |
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-40861

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JAVIER LOPEZ CANTU,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-00-CV-154

USDC No. B-97-CR-20-1

--------------------

December 12, 2002

Before JOLLY, JONES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Javier Lopez Cantu, federal prisoner # 74613-079, appeals

the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, in

which he challenged his 1996 sentence for conspiracy to possess

with intent to distribute 1,000 kilograms or more of marijuana. 

Cantu argues that his sentence violates Apprendi v. New Jersey,

530 U.S. 466 (2000), because the jury was not instructed to find

a drug quantity. 
No. 01-40861

-2-

The district court granted Cantu a certificate of

appealability ("COA") because this court had not yet addressed

whether Apprendi can be applied retroactively to an initial 28

U.S.C. § 2255 motion. This court recently concluded that

Apprendi does not apply retroactively to cases on initial

collateral review. See United States v. Brown, 305 F.3d 304, 310

(5th Cir. 2002). In Brown, we stated that "Apprendi creates a

new rule of criminal procedure which is not retroactively

applicable to initial petitions under [28 U.S.C.] § 2255." Id.

Therefore, Cantu's Apprendi claim fails. 

 Cantu also argues that his trial and appellate counsel

rendered ineffective assistance. We do not reach these issues

because Cantu has not expressly sought to expand the district

court's grant of COA to include them. See United States v.

Kimler, 150 F.3d 429, 431 (5th Cir. 1998)(party must expressly

seek a COA on additional issues not certified by the district

court). 

 AFFIRMED.
### Proposed Provision: B7.8. Replace the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) and Government Pension Offset (GPO) with a revised reduction for most OASI benefits based on all earnings, beginning with beneficiaries newly eligible in 2030.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of School4Chauffeurs,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Jeffery E. Jones, President, Chief Executive Officer and sole
Director of the Company, hereby certifies for the purpose of complying with Rule
13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
"Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code, that:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




Dated: April 14, 2008                    By: /s/ JEFFERY E. JONES
                                         _____________________________________
                                         Jeffery E. Jones
                                         President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                         Sole Director



A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO SCHOOL4CHAUFFEURS, INC., AND WILL
BE RETAINED BY SCHOOL4CHAUFFEURS, INC., AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-10282

Summary Calendar

 

CARDELL RHETT, JR., also known as

Rhett Cardell, Jr.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WAYNE SCOTT, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT

OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION;

CHARLES ALEXANDER, Dr.; MAXWELL GARDINER, Dr.;

SWARTS, Dr.; B. ALLEN; G. PIERSON; B. CASEL;

UTMB MANAGED CARE; SCHERRY MCKELVEY,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:96-CV-114

--------------------

November 8, 1999

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Cardell Rhett, Texas prisoner # 672730, appeals the district

court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action after remand for

consideration of his claim that the defendants delayed replacing

a necessary knee brace for 14 months. Rhett contends that the

defendants’ delay in obtaining the new knee brace constituted

deliberate indifference to his serious medical need for a new 
No. 99-10282 

-2-

knee brace. This court’s prior decision which held that Rhett

stated a claim of deliberate indifference concerning the 14-month

delay in reviewing a new knee brace and that the claim was not

frivolous became the “law of the case.” See Young v. Herring,

917 F.2d 858, 861 (5th Cir. 1990). On remand, the district court

was bound to accept this determination that Rhett had stated a

claim and that the claim was not frivolous. See id. The

district court erred in dismissing Rhett’s claim for a second

time as frivolous and for failure to state a claim under 28

U.S.C. § 1915A and 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(c). Accordingly, the

judgment is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED for further

proceedings.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Exhibit 32.1
 
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes−Oxley Act of 2002)
 
 In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to annual report of ChromaDex Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10−K for the year ending December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Frank L. Jaksch Jr., Chief Scientific Officer of the Company, and Thomas C. Varvaro, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes−Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge:
 
 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 Date: April 30, 2012
 /s/ FRANK L. JAKSCH JR.

Frank L. Jaksch Jr.

Chief Scientific Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)



/s/ THOMAS C. VARVARO

Thomas C. Varvaro

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Dendrite International, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), John E. Bailye, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Kathleen E. Donovan, as Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (section) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his or her knowledge:



|JOHN E. BAILYE      |  |                                                  
|------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Name:               |  | John E. Bailye                                   
|Title:              |  | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|Date:               |  | March 16, 2005                                   
|KATHLEEN E. DONOVAN |  |                                                  
|Name:               |  | Kathleen E. Donovan                              
|Title:              |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|Date:               |  | March 16, 2005                                   

---



QuickLinks