alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Certifications

      I, Susan Mills, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
required to  be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form
10-K of Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-AHL1 (the "Exchange Act periodic
reports");

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole,
do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to  make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in
this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the
Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its
obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be
included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report
on Form 10-K.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A..

Date: March  28, 2008

/s/ Susan Mills
----------------------
Susan Mills
Vice President
(Senior officer in charge of securitization of the Depositor)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-2000
<CASH>                                         11,393,217
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               26,977,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    32,366,988
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         33,635,889
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           3,074,163
<LOANS>                                        222,917,805
<ALLOWANCE>                                    2,615,818
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 304,462,468
<DEPOSITS>                                     241,676,071
<SHORT-TERM>                                   17,479,488
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            2,342,772
<LONG-TERM>                                    5,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       58,852
<OTHER-SE>                                     37,905,284
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 37,964,137
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                8,453,565
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              1,278,894
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               583,762
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               10,316,221
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             5,086,185
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             5,666,344
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          4,649,877
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  709,456
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (8,950)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                5,353,637
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,060,631)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     (1,063,631)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (661,516)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 0
<LOANS-NON>                                    1,384,336
<LOANS-PAST>                                   3,809,092
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                242,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               1,858,040
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  1,038
<RECOVERIES>                                   49,360
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              2,615,818
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           2,615,818
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0



</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES -OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Belden & Blake Corporation (the Company) on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated
below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the knowledge of the undersigned:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: April 5, 2006
    /s/ James M. VanderhiderJames M. Vanderhider, Presidentand Chief Financial Officer This certification
accompanies the Form 10-K and shall not be treated as having been filed as part
of the Form 10-K.
Exhibit 12  Travelport
Limited Computation
of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (dollars in
million)  Year Ended
  December 31, 2005
  
  January 1 - 
  August 22, 2006
  
  July 13,
  (Formation Date) -
  December 31, 2006
  
  Year Ended
  December 31, 2007Earnings available to cover
  fixed charges:Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes,
  minority interest and equity in earnings of investments
  
  $
  (119
  )
  $
  (2,279
  )
  $
  (152
  )
  $
  (387
  )Plus: Fixed charges
  
  56
  
  50
  
  159
  
  410Earnings available to cover fixed charges
  
  $
  (63
  )
  $
  (2,229
  )
  $
  7
  
  $
  23Fixed Charges:Interest, including amortization of deferred financing costs
  
  $
  47
  
  $
  43
  
  $
  155
  
  $
  398Interest portion of rental
  payment
  
  8
  
  7
  
  4
  
  12Total fixed charges
  
  $
  56
  
  $
  50
  
  $
  159
  
  $
  410Ratio of Earnings to fixed
  charges
  
  n/a
  
  n/a
  
  0.04
  x
  0.06
  x  Due
to the loss from continuing operations before income taxes, minority interest
and equity in earnings of investments for the year ended December 31, 2005
and the period January 1, 2006 through August 22, 2006, the
Predecessors earnings would have been insufficient to cover fixed charges by $119
million and $2,279 million, respectively.
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18
                           OF THE UNITED STATES CODE,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of YSEEK,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10QSB for the period ending  September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
Weintraub, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
               or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  result  of
               operations of the Company.


/s/ David Weintraub
--------------------------------
David Weintraub
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2002
1

The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 04-3943

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Missouri.

William J. Dixon, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: December 7, 2005

Filed: December 29, 2005 

___________

Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

William J. Dixon appeals the 108-month prison sentence the district court1

imposed after he pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a firearm as a previously

convicted felon. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(a)(2) (10-year maximum prison

term). He maintains that the district court violated Blakely v. Washington, 124 S. Ct.

2531 (2004), by enhancing his sentence based on judge-found facts. The government

argues that the appeal should be dismissed, noting that Dixon executed a written plea

agreement in which he specifically waived his right to “appeal or otherwise challenge
-2-

the constitutionality or legality of the Sentencing Guidelines,” and generally agreed

not to appeal his sentence on any ground unless the sentencing court departed upward

or imposed “a sentence in excess of the statutory maximum” or “in violation of law

apart from the Sentencing Guidelines.”

We enforce this appeal waiver. At the guilty-plea hearing, the district court

discussed the waiver with Dixon, ensuring that Dixon was pleading guilty voluntarily,

and Dixon does not challenge the validity of the plea agreement on appeal. The

constitutional challenge falls within the scope of the waiver, and no miscarriage of

justice would result from enforcing the waiver. See United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d

886, 889-92 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 997 (2003). Dixon offers two

arguments to avoid the appeal waiver: first, that his pre-Blakely plea agreement could

not have waived “rights that he didn’t know existed prior to the Blakely decision,” and

second, that his appeal is permitted by the waiver’s language, as the challenged

enhancements – which were based on judge-found facts – resulted in a sentence “in

violation of law apart from the Sentencing Guidelines” and “in excess of the statutory

maximum” under Blakely. Both arguments are unavailing. See United States v.

Young, 413 F.3d 727, 729-30 (8th Cir. 2005) (where pre-Blakely agreement stated

“defendant agrees not to appeal or otherwise challenge the constitutionality or legality

of the Sentencing Guidelines,” holding that Blakely challenge to sentencing

enhancements made pursuant to judge-found facts came within waiver’s scope; also

rejecting argument that after Blakely, top of Guidelines range constitutes “statutory

maximum”).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

______________________________
EX-35.1
SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

Downey Savings and Loan Association, F.A.

DSLA 2007-AR1


The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Downey Savings and Loan
Association, F.A., as servicer (the "Servicer") pursuant to the applicable
servicing agreement, does hereby certify, pursuant to Regulation AB, section
229.1123 (Item 1123), that:

1. A review of the Servicer's activities during the period from and including
January 1, 2007 through and including December 31, 2007 and of the Servicer's
performance under the applicable servicing agreement has been made under my
supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in
all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Servicer Compliance
Statement this 29th day of February 2008.


By: /s/ John Amador
Name: John Amador,
Title: Senior Vice President
Exhibit
23.2








CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT ENGINEERS





As
independent engineering consultants, Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc.
hereby consents to the use of our report entitled “Evaluation of Oil and Gas
Reserves to the Interests of Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. in Certain Domestic
Oil and Gas Reserves and to the Interests of Warrior Gas Company in the Gataga
Gas Unit No. 5A, Vermejo (Ellenburger) Field, Loving County, Texas Effective
December 31, 2008, for Disclosure to the Securities and Exchange Commission,
Williamson Project 8.9314” dated February 23, 2009 and data extracted therefrom
(and all references to our Firm) included in or made a part of this Form 10-K
Annual Report to be filed on or about March 13, 2009 and to the
incorporation by reference of this Form 10-K Annual Report (including the use of
our report and references to our Firm herein) into that certain Registration
Statement on Form S-3 filed by Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, file number 333-116825, and those certain Registration
Statements on Form S-8 filed by Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, file numbers 33-68320, 33-68318, 33-68316,
33-69688, and 33-92834 covering the Bonus Incentive Plan of Clayton Williams
Energy, Inc., 1993 Stock Compensation Plan of Clayton Williams Energy, Inc.,
Outside Directors Stock Option Plan of Clayton Williams Energy, Inc., Clayton
Williams Energy, Inc. 401(k) Plan & Trust, and the Executive Incentive Stock
Compensation Plan of Clayton Williams Energy, Inc., respectively.

















WILLIAMSON
PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS, INC.





Midland,
Texas


March 12,
2009
#### CRAIG CAMPO, by His Next Friend, MRS. ANNIE CAMPO, v. S. H. KRESS & COMPANY.

(Filed 20 November, 1935.)

Appeal and Error J a — ■

Defendant moved to set aside tbe verdict on the ground of newly discovered evidence, and for that the verdict was not supported by the evidence, and for that the damages awarded were excessive. *Held:*The discretionary rulings of the trial court denying the motions are not reviewable.

Appeal by the defendant from *McElroy, J.,*at April Term, 1935, of MecicleNbuRG.

Affirmed.

*Carswell & Erpin for plaintiff, appellee.*

*Cansler & Gamier and R. M. Gray, Jr., for defendant, appellant.*

Per Curiam.

The jury by their verdict found that the defendant unlawfully arrested and wrongfully made an assault upon the plaintiff and assessed his damages at $2,250. From judgment in accord with the verdict the defendant appealed to the Supreme Court.

The defendant made three assignments of error, namely, (1) that the court erred in denying defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict on the ground of newly discovered evidence, (2) that the court erred in denying defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict on the ground that the same was contrary *to*and unsupported by the evidence, and (3) that the court erred in denying defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict on the fourth *817issue on tbe ground tbat tbe damages awarded were excessive. It appears from tbe record tbat tbe action of tbe court in denying tbe motions of tbe appellant was taken in eacb instance in tbe exercise of judicial discretion, and, for tbat reason, are not reviewable. *Carson v. Dellinger,*90 N. C., 226; *Hoke v. Whisnant,*174 N. C., 658; *Benton v. R. R.,*122 N. C., 1007 (1009), and cases there cited.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000880114
<NAME> BELDEN & BLAKE CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           8,606
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,523
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      9,397
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,724
<PP&E>                                         324,144
<DEPRECIATION>                                  86,808
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 303,763
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,614
<BONDS>                                         97,642
<COMMON>                                         1,123
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,400
<OTHER-SE>                                     155,395
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   303,763
<SALES>                                        149,535
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               153,235
<CGS>                                           81,964
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   81,964
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                42,128
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,383
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,760
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,566
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,194
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (439)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,755
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.30
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.1











PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with this Annual Report of Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Spyros Capralos, the Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.





Date: March 30, 2011








/s/  Spyros Capralos


Spyros Capralos


Principal Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         I, A. Mark Young, certify that:

         1.       I have reviewed  this  amendment no. 2 to the annual report on
                  Form 10-K/A of E Com Ventures, Inc. (the "Company"); and

         2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
                  statement of a material  fact or omit to state a material fact
                  necessary  to  make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of the
                  circumstances  under  which such  statements  were  made,  not
                  misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.


         Date: August 29, 2003               /S/ A. MARK YOUNG
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             A. Mark Young
                                             Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.1
       a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.