alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 -0.81 -0.83 -22% -19%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

September 15, 2023

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Level of Monthly Benefits

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: B7.5. Increase benefits by 5 percent for all beneficiaries as of the beginning of 2024 

and for those newly eligible for benefits after the beginning of 2024.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

22.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 10.11


                                 PROMISSORY NOTE


Dallas, Texas                     $15,000,000.00                March 12, 1998


     CompUSA Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Borrower"), for value 
received, promises to pay to the order of THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA ("Lender"), 
at the principal office of NationsBank of Texas, N.A., in lawful money of the 
United States of America, the principal sum of FIFTEEN MILLION AND NO/100 
DOLLARS ($15,000,000.00), or such lesser sum as shall be due and payable from 
time to time hereunder, as hereinafter provided.  All terms used but not 
defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Credit Agreement 
described below.

     Principal of and interest on the unpaid principal balance of Advances 
under this Note from time to time outstanding shall be due and payable as set 
forth in the Credit Agreement.

     This Note is issued pursuant to and evidences Advances under a Second 
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of March 12, 1998, among the 
Borrower, NationsBank of Texas, N.A., as Administrative Lender, certain 
Co-Agents and the lenders parties thereto (as amended, restated, 
supplemented, renewed, extended or otherwise modified from time to time, 
"Credit Agreement"), to which reference is made for a statement of the rights 
and obligations of the Lender and the duties and obligations of the Borrower 
in relation thereto; but neither this reference to the Credit Agreement nor 
any provision thereof shall affect or impair the absolute and unconditional 
obligation of the Borrower to pay the principal sum of and interest on this 
Note when due.

     The Borrower and all endorsers, sureties and guarantors of this Note 
(without waiving any notice that any Lender is specifically required to give 
pursuant to SECTION 8.1 of the Credit Agreement) hereby severally waive 
demand, presentment for payment, protest, notice of protest, notice of 
intention to accelerate the maturity of this Note, notice of acceleration of 
this Note, diligence in collecting, the bringing of any suit against any 
party and any notice of or defense on account of any extensions, renewals, 
partial payments or changes in any manner of or in this Note or in any of its 
terms, provisions and covenants, or any releases or substitutions of any 
security, or any delay, indulgence or other act of any trustee or any holder 
hereof, whether before or after maturity.

THIS NOTE, TOGETHER WITH THE OTHER LOAN DOCUMENTS, REPRESENTS THE FINAL 
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PARTIES AND MAY NOT 

<PAGE>

BE CONTRADICTED BY EVIDENCE OF PRIOR, CONTEMPORANEOUS, OR SUBSEQUENT ORAL 
AGREEMENTS OF THE PARTIES HERETO.  THERE ARE NO UNWRITTEN ORAL AGREEMENTS 
BETWEEN THE PARTIES.

                                       CompUSA Inc.



                                       By:  /s/  Robert Gary
                                          -------------------------------
                                          Name:  Robert Gary
                                          Title:  Vice President-Finance




                                       -2-
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 24 (Friday, February 5, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 6300]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02362]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Sunshine Act Meetings; National Science Board

    The National Science Board, pursuant to NSF regulations (45 CFR 
part 614), the National Science Foundation Act, as amended, (42 U.S.C. 
1862n-5), and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), 
hereby gives notice of the addition of an agenda item in the plenary 
closed session of the National Science Board meetings on February 3, 
2016, as shown below. The original notice appeared in the Federal 
Register on January 29, 2016 at 81 FR 70259.

Amended Agenda

Plenary Board meeting

Closed session: 12:30-1:00 p.m.
    NSB Chair's remarks
    Approval of closed plenary minutes for November 2015
    Approval of Stampede 2 preliminary resolution
    Approval of Gemini preliminary resolution
    Discussion and approval of Board's next steps regarding NEON 
(ADDED)
    Closed committee reports
    NSB Chair's closing remarks

UPDATES:  Please refer to the National Science Board Web site for 
additional information. Meeting information and schedule updates (time, 
place, subject matter or status of meeting) may be found at http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/meetings/notices.jsp.

AGENCY CONTACT:  Ron Campbell, [email protected], 703-292-7000.

Kyscha Slater-Williams,
Program Specialist, National Science Board.
[FR Doc. 2016-02362 Filed 2-3-16; 11:15 am]
 BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
```
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3292 

To require the Secretary of Agriculture to initiate hearings to review Federal 

milk marketing orders relating to pricing of Class I skim milk, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 1, 2021 

Mrs. GILLIBRAND (for herself, Ms. COLLINS, and Mr. LEAHY) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Agriculture to initiate hearings 

to review Federal milk marketing orders relating to pricing of Class I skim milk, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Dairy Pricing Oppor5 tunity Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NOTICE AND HEARINGS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the 

8 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Agriculture 

9 shall provide notice of, and initiate, national hearings to 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3292 IS

1 review Federal milk marketing orders under section 8c(3) 

2 of the Agricultural Adjustment Act (7 U.S.C. 608c(3)), 

3 reenacted with amendments by the Agricultural Marketing 

4 Agreement Act of 1937, which shall include review and 

5 consideration of views and proposals of producers and the 

6 dairy industry on the Class I skim milk price, including 

7 the ‘‘higher of’’ Class I skim milk formula described in 

8 subsection (b) and any other views and proposals on the 

9 Class I skim milk price, and such other matters as the 

10 Secretary of Agriculture considers appropriate. 

11 (b) ‘‘HIGHER OF’’ CLASS I SKIM MILK FORMULA

12 DESCRIBED.—The ‘‘higher of’’ Class I skim milk formula 

13 referred to in subsection (a) is the formula under which, 

14 for purposes of determining prices for milk of the highest 

15 use classification, the Class I skim milk price per hundred16 weight specified in section 1000.50(b) of title 7, Code of 

17 Federal Regulations (or successor regulations), is equal to 

18 the sum obtained by adding— 

19 (1) the adjusted Class I differential specified in 

20 section 1000.52 of that title (or successor regula21 tions); 

22 (2) the adjustment to Class I prices specified in 

23 sections 1005.51(b), 1006.51(b), and 1007.51(b) of 

24 that title (or successor regulations); and 

25 (3) the higher of— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3292 IS

1 (A) the advanced pricing factor computed 

2 under section 1000.50(q)(1) of that title (or 

3 successor regulations); and 

4 (B) the advanced pricing factor computed 

5 under section 1000.50(q)(2) of that title (or 

6 successor regulations). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          24,411
<SECURITIES>                                    50,405
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,614
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,109
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                98,827
<PP&E>                                           9,697
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,678
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 145,109
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          101,261
<BONDS>                                         35,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        60,925
<OTHER-SE>                                    (75,897)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   145,109
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,134
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,064
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,957)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,253)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,704)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,704)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.58)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 27 (Thursday, February 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7764]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3183]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. TM95-7-29-001]


Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

February 3, 1995.
    Take notice that on January 31, 1995 Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line 
Corporation (TGPL) tendered for filing Twentieth Revised Fourth Revised 
Sheet No. 50 to its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, which 
tariff sheet is proposed to be effective February 1, 1995.
    TGPL states that the purpose of the instant filing is to supplement 
TGPL's FT-NT tracking filing on January 20, 1995 in Docket No. TM95-7-
29-000 (January 20 Filing) which filing is proposed to be effective 
January 1, 1995. The instant filing is required in order that the 
revised Rate Schedule FT-NT rates reflected in TGPL's January 20 Filing 
be reflected on Sheet No. 50 effective February 1, 1995. In that 
regard, on December 30, 1994 TGPL filed in Docket No. RP95-113 
(December 30 Filing) revised tariff sheets (including a revised Sheet 
No. 50) which, among other things, eliminated expired producer 
settlement payment recovery provisions effective February 1, 1995. The 
December 30 Filing was accepted to be effective February 1, 1995 by a 
letter order issued by the Office of Pipeline Regulation on January 23, 
1995.
    TGPL states that Tariff Sheet No. 50 included in the December 30 
Filing reflects the FT-NT rates in effect prior to TGPL's January 20 
Filing. Therefore, the instant filing is being made to integrate the 
revised FT-NT rates proposed effective January 1, 1995 in TGPL's 
January 20 Filing with the revisions approved in the December 30 Filing 
effective as of February 1, 1995.
    TGPL states that copies of the instant filing are being mailed to 
its FT-NT customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol 
Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Sec. 385.211 of 
the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests should be 
filed on or before February 10, 1995. Protests will be considered by 
the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but 
will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-3183 Filed 2-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
        NAME OF                                         JURISDICTION OF
       SUBSIDIARY                                        INCORPORATION
       ----------                                       ---------------
<S>                                                     <C>
Cayenne Software GmbH ...............................   Germany

Bachman Information Systems Canada, Ltd. ............   Canada

Bachman International Ltd. ..........................   Delaware

Cayenne Software S.A.R.L. ...........................   France

Cayenne Software S.R.L. .............................   Italy

Bachman Information Systems Limited .................   United Kingdom

Bachman Securities Corporation ......................   Massachusetts

WindTunnel Software, Inc. ...........................   Delaware

CSI Acquisition Corporation .........................   Massachusetts

Cayenne Software Asia Pacific Pte. LTD. .............   Singapore

Cayenne Software Spain S.L. .........................   Spain

Cadre Technologies, Inc. ............................   Delaware

Cadre Technologies, International ...................   Oregon

Cadre Technologies S.A. .............................   Switzerland

Cadre Technologies, France S.A. .....................   France

Cadre Technologies GMBH .............................   Germany

Cayenne Software Pty Limited ........................   Australia

Cayenne Software Limited ............................   United Kingdom

Westmount Technologies B.V. .........................   Netherlands

Westmount U.S.A., Inc. ..............................   Delaware

Micro Case, Inc. ....................................   Delaware

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 27 (Thursday, February 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7765-7766]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3198]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. GT95-20-000]


Trunkline Gas Co.; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

February 3, 1995.
    Take notice that on February 1, 1995, Trunkline Gas Company 
(Trunkline) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1, revised tariff sheets, as listed on Appendix A 
attached to the filing, proposed to be effective November 1, 1994, 
December 1, 1994 and January 1, 1995.
    Trunkline states that this filing is being made in compliance with 
Section 154.41(b) of the Commission's Regulations. Trunkline states 
that the revised tariff sheets reflects updates to the Index of Firm 
Customers.
    Trunkline states that copies of this filing are being mailed to all 
affected shippers and interested state regulatory agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 
20426, in accordance with Secs. 385.211 and 385.214 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests should be filed on 
or before February 10, 1995. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are 
[[Page 7766]] available for public inspection in the Public Reference 
Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-3198 Filed 2-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
### Proposed Provision: B7.13. Eliminate the DI 5-month waiting period for disabled workers and disabled surviving spouses, and eliminate the 24-month Medicare (HI) waiting period for individuals who have become entitled to Social Security disability benefits.  Effective with 2024 applications.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                           1
<CASH>                              833,044
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                             0
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    833,044
<PP&E>                              344,780
<DEPRECIATION>                      139,267
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    3,144,123
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             1,465,998
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                            480,408
<OTHER-SE>                        1,197,717
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      3,144,123
<SALES>                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          0
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   17,611
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (3,925,460)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (3,925,460)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                     (3,925,460)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (.08)
        



</TABLE>
1 The Honorable Charles R. Wolle, United States District Judge for the Southern

District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 00-3437

___________ George Frye, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Southern District of Iowa. Comair, Inc., * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: April 24, 2001 Filed: April 27, 2001

___________ Before BOWMAN, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. George Frye appeals from the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his Age Discrimination in Employment Act complaint. Upon de novo review of the summary judgment record, and viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to Frye, we conclude summary judgment was proper because Frye failed to submit sufficient evidence that Comair’s stated reasons for his termination were a-2-

pretext for age discrimination. See Dammenv. UniMed Med. Ctr. , 236 F.3d 978, 980 (8th Cir. 2001) (standard of review; burden-shifting analysis). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 1585** 

ANNETTE SHARIF , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. R. PETER MASTERTON, Department of the Army , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court fo r the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. James R. Spencer , Chief District Judge. ( 3:11

- cv - 0 0160

- JRS )

Submitted : September 29, 2011 Decided: October 4, 2011

Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per cu riam opinion
. Annette Sharif, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Annette Sharif appeals the district court ’ s order d ismissing her civil complaint without prejudice pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), (ii) (2006), and a subsequent order denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sharif v. Masterton , No. 3:11

- cv 00160

- JRS (E.D . Va. April 19, 2011; May 17, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### STATE v. J. N. FINCH and CHARLIE POOLE.

(Filed 20 November, 1940.)

Appeal by defendant Finch from *Parker, J.,*at September Term, 1940, of Wake.

*513
      *Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorneys-General Bruton and Patton for the State.*

*W. Brantley Womble for defendant, appellant.*

Schencic, J.

In tbis case a motion in arrest of judgment is lodged by the appellant Fincb. Tbe record and facts are identical witb those in another case against the appellant in which decision was this day rendered, except the codefendant is one Charlie Poole instead of P. *~W.*Cooper.

For the reasons set forth in the former, it will be certified that the judgment pronounced against the appellant Finch be arrested.

Reversed.
### The Honorable Thomas M. Shanahan, United States Distric t 1 

### Judge for the District of Nebraska. ___________ No. 96-1129

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. William Gamble, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: June 28, 1996 Filed: July 12, 1996

___________ Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. William Gamble appeals th e district court's denial of his motion to 1 dismiss an indictment charging him with drug and firearm offenses. As he did below, Gamble argues that a prior administra tive forfeiture proceeding against cash found in his residence, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881 , constituted punishmen t and posed a double jeopardy bar to his indictment. Reviewing the district court's ruling de novo, s ee United States v. Petty , 62 F.3d 265, 267 (8th Cir. 1995), we find Gamble's argument is foreclosed by the Supreme Court's recent decision in United States v. Ursery , 1996 WL 340815, *16 (U.S. June 24, 1996) (No. 95-345) (holding that in rem civil forfei tures under 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6) are neither "punishment" no r criminal for purposes of Double Jeopardy Clause).

### -2- Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court.
A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.