alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 8, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 7514]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3252]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Care Financing Administration

42 CFR Part 482

[BPD-826-N]


Medicare Program; Hospice Wage Index

AGENCY: Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA), HHS.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (FACA), this notice announces a meeting of the Negotiated 
Rulemaking Advisory Committee on the Medicare Hospice Wage Index. The 
meeting is open to the public.

DATES: The meeting is scheduled for February 22, 1995, from 10 a.m. 
until 5 p.m. e.s.t., and February 23, 1995, from 9 a.m. until 3 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Room 5051 Cohen Building (The 
Snow Room), 300 C Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20201-0001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Carter, (410) 966-4615.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the authority of the Negotiated 
Rulemaking Act of 1990 (Pub. Law 101-648, 5 U.S.C. 581-590), the 
Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services has 
established the Negotiated Rulemaking Advisory Committee on the 
Medicare Hospice Wage Index. The Committee will make recommendations 
with respect to the content of a proposed rule on the wage index used 
to adjust payment rates for hospice care under the Medicare program to 
reflect local differences in area wage levels. The Committee consists 
of representatives of interests that are likely to be significantly 
affected by the proposed rule.
    A meeting of the Committee will be held on February 22-23, 1995. 
The Committee will undertake the following activities:
    <bullet> Review data runs on various wage index models.
    <bullet> Discuss criteria to be used to evaluate data.
    <bullet> Review issues in light of the data.
    <bullet> Report on analysis of Bureau of Labor Statistics data.
    Individuals or organizations who wish to attend the meeting or make 
oral presentations may do so. However, the number of presentations may 
be limited by the time available. Individuals may also submit written 
statements for the Committee's consideration. For information on how to 
do this and to be put on a list to ensure access to the building, 
please contact the Committee facilitator, Judy Ballard at (202) 690-
7419 by February 21, 1995.

(Section 10(a) of Public Law 92-463 (5 U.S.C. App. 2, section 
10(a)); 45 CFR Part 11

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.773 
Medicare--Hospital Insurance Program)

    Dated: February 3, 1995.
Bruce C. Vladeck,
Administrator, Health Care Financing Administration.
[FR Doc. 95-3252 Filed 2-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 25

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears
below constitutes and appoints Christopher J. Amenson, his attorney-in-fact,
each with the power of substitution, for him in any and all capacities, to sign
any amendments to this Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with exhibits
thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that the said
attorney-in-fact, or his substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be done
by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report
has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and
in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


<Table>
<Caption>
SIGNATURE                                   TITLE                                       DATE
---------                                   -----                                       ----
<S>                                         <C>                                 <C>
/s/ Christopher J. Amenson                  Chairman of the Board
---------------------------                 Chief Executive Officer             September 20, 2002
Christopher J. Amenson


/s/ David H. Greig                          President
---------------------------                 Chief Operating Officer             September 20, 2002
David H. Greig


/s/ James E. Dixon, Jr.                     Vice President,                     September 20, 2002
---------------------------                 Chief Financial Officer
James E. Dixon, Jr.                         Secretary & Treasurer


/s/ Warren W. Andrews                       Director                            September 20, 2002
---------------------------
Warren W. Andrews


Unavailable for Signature                   Director
---------------------------                                                             --
Peter D. Fenner


/s/ Lawrence A. Bennigson                   Director                            September 20, 2002
---------------------------
Lawrence A. Bennigson


/s/ Louis C. Golm                           Director                            September 20, 2002
---------------------------
Louis C. Golm


/s/ Alan F. White                           Director                            September 20, 2002
---------------------------
Alan F. White
</Table>
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO

. 09

- 13

- 00466

- CR

____________________

ANDRE ALEXANDRE SMITH
, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

_________________________________ ______________________

On A ppeal from the 252nd District Court
Jefferson County, Texas
Trial Cause No

. 13

- 16032

________________________________________ ____ ____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, Andre Alexandre Smith pleaded guilty

to burglary of a habitation

. The trial court found the evidence sufficient to

substantiate Smith ’s guilt, deferred further proceedings, and placed Smith on

community supervision for five years. The St ate later filed a motion to revoke

Smith ’s community supervision , alleging two violations of the conditions of his

community supervision

. Smith pleaded “true” to Count II and, after hearing

evidence, the trial court found the evidence to be sufficient to f ind Count I to be2 true. The trial court found that Smith violated the conditions of his community

supervision, adjudicated Smith ’s guilt for burglary of a habitation , revoked Smith ’s

community supervision, and sentenced Smith to nineteen years in prison.

Smith ’ s appellate counsel filed a brief that present s counsel’s professional

evaluation of the record and conclude s Smith ’s appeal is frivolous. See Anders v.

California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App.

1978). We granted an extension of time for Smith to file a pro se brief, but we

received no response from Smith . We have determined that Smith’s appeal is

wholly frivolous. We have independen tly examined the clerk’s record and the

reporter’s record , and we agree that no arg uable issues support the appeal . We find

it unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re

- brief the appeal

.

Compare Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We

affirm the tri al court’s judgment. 1

AFFIRMED.

________________________________ STEVE McKEITHEN

Chief Justice

Submitted on April 30, 2014 Opinion Delivered June 25, 2014

D o Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson , JJ.

1 Smith may challenge our decision by filing a petition for discretionary

review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.
## Detailed Single Year Tables

- Individual Provisions
- Retirement Age

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						C1.6: Starting with those age 62 in 2024, increase the normal retirement age (NRA) 1 month every 2 years until the NRA reaches 69. Also increase the age up to which the delayed retirement credit may be earned at the same rate (from 70 to 72). No change to earliest eligibility age.**

### Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program

### Summarized Estimates
## Summary Measures and Graphs

- Individual Provisions
- Retirement Age

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						C2.5: Increase the normal retirement age (NRA) 3 months per year for those age 62 starting in 2024 and ending in 2035 (NRA reaches 70 for those age 62 in 2035). Thereafter, index the NRA to maintain a constant ratio of expected retirement years (life expectancy at NRA) to potential work years (NRA minus 20). We assume the NRA will increase 1 month every 2 years. Also, increase the earliest eligibility age (EEA) from 62 to 64 at the same time the NRA increases from 67 to 69; that is, for those attaining age 62 in 2024 through 2031. Keep EEA at 64 thereafter.**

|  |  |
|--|--|
EXHIBIT 31.1

     Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Michael W. Katz, certify that:

(1)   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of E Com Ventures, Inc.;

(2)   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
      statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
      make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
      statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
      this annual report; and

(3)   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
      information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
      respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
      the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
      report.

Date: May 28, 2004

By:  /S/ MICHAEL W. KATZ
------------------------
Michael W. Katz
Chief Executive Officer and President


                                       27
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 4 (Friday, January 6, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 2157]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-316]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION


Notice of Intent to Engage in Compensated Intercorporate Hauling 
Operations

    This is to provide notice as required by 49 U.S.C. 10524(b)(1) that 
the named corporations intend to provide or use compensated 
intercorporate hauling operations as authorized in 49 U.S.C. 10524(b).
    A. 1. Parent corporation and address of principal office: Alan 
Corporation of New England, 60 Prescott Street, Worcester, MA 01605.
    2. Wholly owned subsidiaries which will participate in the 
operation, and State of incorporation: Alan Petroleum Carriers Inc., 
Incorporated in the State of Massachusetts.
    B. 1. The parent corporation is Country Fresh, Inc. and the address 
of the principal office is: 2555 Buchanan Avenue S.W., P.O. Box 814, 
Grand Rapids, Michigan 49508.
    2. Wholly-owned subsidiaries which will participate in the 
operations, and their States of Incorporation:

Embest, Inc., a Michigan corporation
G.R. Best, Inc., a Michigan corporation
Bemid, Inc., a Michigan corporation
McDonald Dairy, Inc., a Michigan corporation
Frostbite Brands, Inc., a Michigan corporation
Burger Dairy Co., an Indiana corporation
Toledo Milk Processors, Inc., a Michigan corporation
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-316 Filed 1-5-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7035-01-M
**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT**

**TO SECTION 906OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Intertape Polymer Group Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bernard J. Pitz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: March 7, 2012
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
condensed consolidated balance sheet and the condensed consolidated statement of
operations of DTI Holdings,  Inc. filed as part of the quarterly  report on Form
10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such  quarterly  report on
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   Jun-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      Jul-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                        Dec-31-1998
<CASH>                              225,500,478 
<SECURITIES>                                  0 
<RECEIVABLES>                           462,838 
<ALLOWANCES>                             61,825 
<INVENTORY>                                   0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    226,353,420 
<PP&E>                              128,255,919 
<DEPRECIATION>                        4,766,430 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      362,877,993 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                16,579,031
<BONDS>                             295,555,199
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                 300 
<COMMON>                                300,000         
<OTHER-SE>                           29,588,187         
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        362,877,993         
<SALES>                                       0         
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      3,470,081         
<CGS>                                         0         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         6,496,157         
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0         
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0         
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  (15,456,989)         
[INTEREST-INCOME]                     6,304,340
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (12,178,725)         
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0         
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 (12,178,725)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0         
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0         
<CHANGES>                                     0         
<NET-INCOME>                        (12,178,725)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 0         
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0         
                                      

</TABLE>
### Proposed Provision: B1.4. Progressive price indexing (50th percentile) of PIA factors beginning with individuals newly eligible for OASDI benefits in 2030: Create a new bend point at the 50th percentile of the AIME distribution of newly retired workers. Maintain current-law benefits for earners at the 50th percentile and below. Reduce the 32 and 15 percent factors above the 50th percentile such that the initial benefit for a worker with AIME equal to the taxable maximum grows by inflation rather than the growth in the SSA average wage index.

back
*This matter is being decided by a quorum. 28 U.S.C. §

46(d).

 

** Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-41183

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CHRISTOPHER HINES,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:97-CR-10-1

- - - - - - - - - -

February 9, 1999

Before BARKSDALE and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.*

PER CURIAM:**

Christopher Hines appeals his sentence following his guilty

plea to possession with intent to distribute cocaine base. 21

U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). He contends that he should have been awarded

a reduction for acceptance of responsibility, pursuant to

U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1. Hines objected to relevant-conduct findings

that he distributed crack cocaine on April 11 and May 15, 1996. 

Because Hines failed to present rebuttal evidence to support his 
No. 97-41183

-2-

contention, the sentencing judge was free to adopt the findings

in the presentence report without further inquiry. United States

v. Lugman, 130 F.3d 113, 116 (5th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 118

S. Ct. 1855 (1998). The sentencing judge's denial of the

reduction in offense level is not without foundation and thus not

error. United States v. Brace, 145 F.3d 247, 264 (5th Cir.) (en

banc), cert. denied, 119 S. Ct. 426 (1998). 

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

         I, Alan Rubin, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Alec Bradley Cigar
Corporation;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

                  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
         caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this report is being prepared;

                  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
         controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
         about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
         of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
         evaluation; and

                  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
         internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
         registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal
         quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,
         or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting; and

         5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditor and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

                  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
         the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
         which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's
         ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
         and

                  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
         management or other employees who have a significant role in the
         registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 11, 2003

/s/ Alan Rubin
--------------
Alan Rubin
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 99.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of SmartDisk Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Peter J. Quinn, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




/s/ Peter J. Quinn


---

Peter J. Quinn


Chief Financial Officer


November 14,
2002