alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 249 (Thursday, December 28, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 67137]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31349]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[OR-050-1020-00: GP-0050]


Notice of Meeting of John Day-Snake Resource Advisory Council

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Prineville District.

ACTION: Meeting of John Day-Snake Resource Advisory Council: Walla 
Walla, Washington; February 1-2, 1996.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A meeting of John Day-Snake Resource Advisory Council will be 
held on February 1, 1996, from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., and February 2, 
1996, from 8:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. at the Interior Columbia Basin 
Ecosystem Management Project Office, 112 East Poplar Street, Walla 
Walla, Washington 99362. At an appropriate time each day, the Council 
meeting will recess for approximately one hour for lunch. Public 
comments will be received from 3:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. on Thursday, 
February 1, 1996. Topics to be discussed are the Interior Columbia 
Basin Ecosystem Management Project and standards for rangeland health 
and guidelines for livestock grazing on the public lands.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James L. Hancock, Bureau of Land 
Management, Prineville District Office, 3050 NE Third Street 
Prineville, Oregon 97754, or call 541-447-4115.

    Dated: December 8, 1995.

James L. Hancock,
District Manager.

[FR Doc. 95-31349 Filed 12-27-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-M
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Rory J. Cowan, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Lionbridge Technologies, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for theregistrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared; 

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles; 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: November 9, 2007
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6603
JOHN GRIMES WELLS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusW. K. JONES, Superintendent; DENNIS M. ROWLAND, Assistant Superintendent of Custody, F. E. Brown, Unit Screening Officer, JOHN A. MANESS, Department of Corrections Program Director, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-97-159-5-H) Submitted: September 25, 1997 Decided: October 23, 1997 Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Grimes Wells, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) (West Supp. 1997) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Wells v. Jones , No. CA-97-159-5-H (E.D.N.C. Apr. 15, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 249 (Thursday, December 28, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 67126]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31442]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-33-001]


Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

December 21, 1995.
    Take notice that on December 15, 1995, Northern Natural Gas Company 
(Northern), tendered for filing to become part of Northern's FERC Gas 
Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, 
proposed to be effective December 1, 1995:

Fifth Revised Volume No. 1

Substitute First Revised Original Sheet No. 400
Substitute First revised Sheet No. 412
First Revised Sheet No. 424
First Revised Sheet No. 425
First Revised Sheet No. 426
Second Revised sheet No. 431

    Northern asserts that the purpose of this filing is to comply with 
the Commission's Order issued November 30, 1995, in Docket No. RP96-33-
000, in which Northern proposed to condense and simplify its form of 
Service Agreement.
    Northern states that copies of the filing were served upon the 
company's customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C., 20426, in accordance with Sec.  385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. Pursuant to Sec.  154.210 of the 
Commission's Regulations, all such protests must be filed not later 
than 12 days after the date of the filing noted above. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken in this proceeding, but will not serve to make protestant a 
party to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-31442 Filed 12-27-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 245 (Thursday, December 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66324-66325]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31057]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act

    Notice is hereby given that on December 1, 1995 a proposed Consent 
Decree in United States and State of California v. Shell Oil Company, 
Inc., et al., Case No. CV 91-0589 RJK (Ex) was lodged with the United 
States District Court for the Central District of California. This 
Consent Decree represents a settlement of claims against McAuley LCX 
Corporation (``McAuley'') for costs incurred in connection with the 
McColl Superfund Site in Fullerton, California under section 107 of 
CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 9607.
    Under this settlement between the United States and the State of 
California (``Plaintiffs'') and McAuley, McAuley will pay the United 
States Environmental Protection Agency (``EPA'') $184,000 for past 
United States response costs. The Consent Decree also requires McAuley 
to pay the State of California $66,000 for past State response costs.
    This is the second consent decree entered in this case. The first 
consent decree between the Plaintiffs and the Oil Company Defendants 
(Shell Oil Company, Union Oil Company of California, Atlantic Richfield 
Corporation and Texaco, Inc.) resulted in payment of $18,000,000 from 
the Oil Company Defendants to the Plaintiffs.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments relating to the 
proposed Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General of the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and should refer to 
United States and State of California v. Shell Oil Company, Inc., et 
al., D.J. Ref. 90-11-2-3A.
    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Office of the 
United States Attorney, Central District of California, Room 7516 
Federal Building, 300 North Los Angeles Street, Los Angeles, California 
90012 and at Region IX, Office of the Environmental Protection Agency, 
75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105, and at the 
Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, DC 
20005, (202) 624-0892. A copy of the proposed Consent Decree and 
exhibits thereto may be obtained in person or by mail from the Consent 
Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005. 
In requesting a copy, please enclose a check in the amount of $9.50 (25 
cents 

[[Page 66325]]
per page reproduction cost) payable to the Consent Decree Library.
Joel Gross,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 95-31057 Filed 12-20-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Transition Report of Perfumania Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for
the transition period ended February 2, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donna Dellomo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Donna DellomoDonna DellomoChief Financial OfficerOctober 21, 2008
### Proposed Provision: B5.2. Beginning for those newly eligible in 2024, reconfigure the special minimum benefit: (a) A year of coverage is defined as a year in which 4 quarters of coverage are earned. (b) At implementation, set the PIA for 30 years of coverage equal to 125 percent of the monthly poverty level (about $1,416 in 2022). For those with under 30 years of coverage, the PIA per year of coverage over 10 years is $1,416/20 = $70.80. (c) Index the initial PIA per year of coverage by wage growth for successive cohorts.

back
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 27 (Thursday, February 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7762]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3184]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-152-000]


NorAm Gas Transmission Co.; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

February 3, 1995.
    Take notice that on February 1, 1995, NorAm Gas Transmission 
Company (NGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Fourth Revised Volume No. 1, First Revised Sheet No. 168, Original 
Sheet No. 168A and First Revised Sheet No. 233 and First Revised Sheet 
No. 233A, to become effective February 2, 1995.
    NGT states that these revised tariff sheets modify Section 12.1 of 
NGT's General Terms and Conditions to provide that the compressor fuel 
assessment or retention percentage provisions of the FT, IT, or NNTS 
Rate Schedule, whichever is applicable, will not apply to transactions 
in which gas is both received from and delivered to points within the 
Perryville Hub and to which no compression is required to effectuate 
these transactions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 
20426, in accordance with Rules 214 and 211 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 and 385.211). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before February 10, 1995. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-3184 Filed 2-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
##### 



Exhibit 10.3
  US $300,000.00
    
    October 31, 2007
 BRIDGE LOAN
PROMISSORY NOTE
 Maker Holder
 Interest
 Payments Maturity Date
 Guaranty. Guaranty Guarantor Guaranteed Obligations
   Prepayment
 Default Event of
Default




---



##### 



Collection Costs
 Waiver
 Transfer
 Governing Law
 Representations and Warranties of Maker
   Representations and Warranties of Guarantor
    2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



5
 Holders Address
    
    
    
    Maker:REMOTE KNOWLEDGE, INC.,a Delaware CorporationBy: /s/ Henry HoustonName: Henry Houston CFOGuarantor:
    
    Randy S Bayne/s/ Randy S. Bayne
  4
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet and the consolidated statement of income filed as
part of the annual report of form 10-K and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          10,526
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             257
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 2,484
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     30,544
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          74,843
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            73,631
<LOANS>                                        198,280
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,419
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 326,546
<DEPOSITS>                                     269,939
<SHORT-TERM>                                    12,836
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                860
<LONG-TERM>                                      9,710
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,674
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,528
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 326,546
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 17,715
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,387
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   605
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                23,707
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              10,869
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,682
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           12,025
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,100
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   6
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,573
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,415
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,266
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,266
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.61
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.96
<LOANS-NON>                                        529
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,008
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,888
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      605
<RECOVERIES>                                        36
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,419
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,067
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            352


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 8, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 7625]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3205]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS


AD Hoc Structure Committee on Governance

TIME AND DATE: The Legal Services Corporation Board of Directors Ad Hoc 
Structure Committee on Governance will meet on February 16, 1995. The 
meeting will commence at 5:00 p.m.

PLACE: The Legal Service Corporation, 750 1st Street, N.E., The Board 
Room, Washington, D.C. 20002, (202) 336-8800.

STATUS OF MEETING: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

OPEN SESSION: 

    1. Approval of Agenda.
    2. Consider and Act on Any Suggested Changes for Board 
Governance and Committee Structure.
    3. Consider and Act on Other Business.

CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION: Patricia Batie (202) 336-8800.
    Upon request, meeting notices will be made available in alternate 
formats to accommodate visual and hearing impairments.
    Individuals who have a disability and need an accommodation to 
attend the meeting may notify Patricia Batie at (202) 336-8800.

    Dated: February 3, 1995.
Patricia D. Batie,
Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-3205 Filed 2-3-95; 4:46 pm]
BILLING CODE 7050-01-M
### Proposed Provision: D4. Establish an alternative benefit for a surviving spouse. For the surviving spouse, the alternative benefit would equal 75 percent of the sum of the survivor's own worker benefit and the deceased worker's PIA (including any actuarial reductions or delayed retirement credits). If the deceased worker died before becoming entitled, use the age 62 actuarial reduction if deceased before age 62, or the applicable actuarial reduction/DRC for entitlement at the age of death if deceased after 62. The alternative benefit would not exceed the PIA of a hypothetical earner who earns the SSA average wage index (AWI) every year, and who becomes eligible for retired-worker benefits in the same year in which the deceased worker became entitled to worker benefits or died (if before entitlement). The alternative benefit would be paid only if more than the current-law benefit. This benefit would be available to surviving spouses on the rolls at the beginning of 2025 and those becoming eligible after 2024.

back
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           47000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    25200
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                111300
<PP&E>                                         1487300
<DEPRECIATION>                                  191100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1414400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           102300
<BONDS>                                         814500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      495000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1414400
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                287700
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   182300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               21900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  88500
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              88500
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     88500
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.07
        

</TABLE>