alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 0.10 0.20 3% 5%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

September 15, 2023

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Level of Monthly Benefits

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: B3.13. For retired worker beneficiaries newly eligible in 2030 (excluding disabled 

workers), add a new bend point at the wage-indexed equivalent of the 50th percentile of the AIME 

distribution minus $100 (for 2015 eligibility) and change the PIA factors to 95/32/15/5. Also move the 

current-law first bend point from the wage-indexed equivalent of $1,115 in 2023 to $1,417 in 2023. Phase 

this provision in over 10 years (2030-2039). The phase-in would work on a weighted-average basis: 90% 

of CL formula + 10% of proposal formula for 2030, 80% of CL formula + 20% of proposal formula for 2031, 

and so on.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 23 (Thursday, February 4, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 6004]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02134]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice of Termination; 10033 Suburban Federal Savings Bank; 
Crofton, Maryland

    The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), as Receiver for 
10033 Suburban Federal Savings Bank, Crofton, Maryland (Receiver) has 
been authorized to take all actions necessary to terminate the 
receivership estate of Suburban Federal Savings Bank (Receivership 
Estate); the Receiver has made all dividend distributions required by 
law.
    The Receiver has further irrevocably authorized and appointed FDIC-
Corporate as its attorney-in-fact to execute and file any and all 
documents that may be required to be executed by the Receiver which 
FDIC-Corporate, in its sole discretion, deems necessary; including but 
not limited to releases, discharges, satisfactions, endorsements, 
assignments and deeds.
    Effective February 1, 2016, the Receivership Estate has been 
terminated, the Receiver discharged, and the Receivership Estate has 
ceased to exist as a legal entity.

    Dated: February 1, 2016.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-02134 Filed 2-3-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
The State of TexasAppellee

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

Wednesday, February 4, 2015

No. 04-14-00731-CR

Stephanie M. TREJO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR0086W

Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant filed her first pro se motion to dismiss this appeal on October 28, 2014. 

However, the motion was not signed by her retained attorney, Jesse G. Rivera, as required by 

Rule 42.2(a). TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). The clerk of this court attempted to contact appellant’s 

counsel several times about the motion to dismiss but counsel did not respond. Therefore, the 

pro se motion to dismiss was denied on November 17, 2014 for failure to comply with Rule

42.2(a). Appellant has now filed another pro se motion to dismiss the appeal accompanied by a 

letter asking for the appointment of new counsel. The appellant’s brief is currently due on 

February 11, 2015.

 

Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we 

ABATE this case to the trial court and ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to answer the 

following questions:

(1) Does appellant desire to prosecute her appeal?

(2) Is appellant indigent? If appellant is indigent, the trial court shall take such measures 

as may be necessary to assure the effective assistance of counsel, which may include the 

appointment of new counsel.

(3) Has appointed or retained counsel abandoned the appeal? Because sanctions may be

necessary, the trial court should address this issue even if new counsel is retained or 

substituted before the date of the hearing.
The trial court may, in its discretion, receive evidence on the first two questions by sworn 

affidavit from the appellant. The trial court shall, however, order the appellant’s counsel to be 

present at the hearing.

The trial court is further ORDERED to file supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records in 

this court, no later than thirty days after the date of this order, which shall include: (1) a 

transcription of the hearing and copies of any documentary evidence admitted, (2) written 

findings of fact and conclusions of law, and (3) recommendations addressing the above 

enumerated questions. All appellate filing dates are ABATED pending further orders from this 

court. 

 

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 4th day of February, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C., App. 2, the Commission on Care gives amended notice that it will meet Monday, February 8, 2016 at the Washington Marriott at Metro Center, 775 12th St. NW., Washington, DC 20005. The meeting will convene at 12:00 p.m. and end no later than 8:00 p.m. The meeting is open to the public.

The purpose of the Commission, as described in section 202 of the Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability Act of 2014, is to examine the access of veterans to health care from the Department of Veterans Affairs and strategically examine how best to organize the Veterans Health Administration, locate health care resources, and deliver health care to veterans during the next 20 years.

                    No time will be allocated at this meeting for receiving oral presentations from the public. The public may submit written statements for the Commission's review to                     *commissiononcare@va.gov*. Any member of the public wanting to attend may also register their intention to attend by emailing the same address.                

Dated: February 1, 2016.

John Goodrich, 

Designated Federal Officer, Commission on Care.

[FR Doc. 2016-02177 Filed 2-4-16; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

EARL LOUIS HOLLINS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 251 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23rd day of January, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Lionbridge Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Rory J. Cowan,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Donald M. Muir, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|Dated: May 9, 2011     
|                       
|/s/ RORY J. COWAN      
|Rory J. Cowan          
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|/s/ DONALD M. MUIR     
|Donald M. Muir         
|Chief Financial Officer
exv10w2






Exhibit 10.2




AMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY’S OUTSIDE DIRECTORS STOCK

AND INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN




RECITALS:




     WHEREAS, LifePoint Hospitals, Inc. (the “Company”) established the LifePoint Hospitals, Inc.
Outside Directors Stock and Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) effective May 11, 1999 in
order to encourage equity ownership in the Company among its executives and to align the financial
interests of such executives and the Company’s stockholders;



     WHEREAS, the Company amended and restated the Plan effective May 14, 2008, without the need
for approval from the Company’s stockholders



     WHEREAS, the Plan provides for a ten year term;



     WHEREAS, Section 14 of the Plan provides that the board of directors of the Company may amend
the Plan at any time, subject to the approval of the Company’s stockholders where necessary;



     WHEREAS, the board of directors of the Company has authorized the amendment of the Plan to
extend its term indefinitely, provided that the Company shall not grant new awards under the Plan
following the effective date of this amendment unless such grants are approved by the Company’s
stockholders; and



     WHEREAS, the Company intends to seek approval for continued grants under the Plan throughout
the Plan’s term, as extended by this amendment, at its annual meeting on May 12, 2009;



     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended by restating Section 15 of the Plan in its entirety
as follows:



     15. Term of the Plan.




     The Plan shall remain in effect until such time that it is terminated by the
Board; provided, however, that no new Awards may be made under the Plan unless
approval for such action is given by the Company’s stockholders at the Company’s
2009 annual meeting. If such approval is attained at the Company’s 2009 annual
meeting, Awards may be made under the Plan, in accordance with the Plan’s terms,
until such time that additional approval from the Company’s stockholders would be
required under any law, regulation or stock exchange requirement. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, neither termination of the Plan nor failure to receive approval from
the Company’s stockholders at the Company’s 2009 annual meeting shall, without the
consent of any Participant who then holds an Award, alter or impair any rights or
obligations in respect of such Award.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned officer of the Company has executed this Amendment on this
the 24th day of March, 2009.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	LIFEPOINT HOSPITALS, INC.	 	 
	 

	 	By:	 	/s/ John P. Bumpus	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 

	 	 
	 

	 	Its:	 	EVP and Chief Administrative Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES -OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 I, Mark A. Houser, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this
annual report on Form 10-K of Belden & Blake Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: April 5, 2006

/s/ Mark A. HouserMark A. Houser, Chief Executive Officer andChairman of the Board of Directors
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18

OF THE UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of World Energy Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Benjamin C. Croxton, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/Benjamin C. Croxton

--------------------------------

BENJAMIN C. CROXTON

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer

World Energy Solutions, Inc.



August 13, 2007
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5139 Filed: 12/16/19 Entered: 12/16/19 14:50:53 Page 1 of

25
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5139 Filed: 12/16/19 Entered: 12/16/19 14:50:53 Page 2 of

25
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5139 Filed: 12/16/19 Entered: 12/16/19 14:50:53 Page 3 of

25
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5139 Filed: 12/16/19 Entered: 12/16/19 14:50:53 Page 4 of

25
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5139 Filed: 12/16/19 Entered: 12/16/19 14:50:53 Page 5 of

25
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5139 Filed: 12/16/19 Entered: 12/16/19 14:50:53 Page 6 of

25
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5139 Filed: 12/16/19 Entered: 12/16/19 14:50:53 Page 7 of

25
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5139 Filed: 12/16/19 Entered: 12/16/19 14:50:53 Page 8 of

25
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5139 Filed: 12/16/19 Entered: 12/16/19 14:50:53 Page 9 of

25
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5139 Filed: 12/16/19 Entered: 12/16/19 14:50:53 Page 10

of 25
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5139 Filed: 12/16/19 Entered: 12/16/19 14:50:53 Page 11

of 25
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5139 Filed: 12/16/19 Entered: 12/16/19 14:50:53 Page 12

of 25
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5139 Filed: 12/16/19 Entered: 12/16/19 14:50:53 Page 13

of 25
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5139 Filed: 12/16/19 Entered: 12/16/19 14:50:53 Page 14

of 25
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5139 Filed: 12/16/19 Entered: 12/16/19 14:50:53 Page 15

of 25
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5139 Filed: 12/16/19 Entered: 12/16/19 14:50:53 Page 16

of 25
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5139 Filed: 12/16/19 Entered: 12/16/19 14:50:53 Page 17

of 25
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5139 Filed: 12/16/19 Entered: 12/16/19 14:50:53 Page 18

of 25
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5139 Filed: 12/16/19 Entered: 12/16/19 14:50:53 Page 19

of 25
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5139 Filed: 12/16/19 Entered: 12/16/19 14:50:53 Page 20

of 25
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5139 Filed: 12/16/19 Entered: 12/16/19 14:50:53 Page 21

of 25
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5139 Filed: 12/16/19 Entered: 12/16/19 14:50:53 Page 22

of 25
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5139 Filed: 12/16/19 Entered: 12/16/19 14:50:53 Page 23

of 25
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5139 Filed: 12/16/19 Entered: 12/16/19 14:50:53 Page 24

of 25
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5139 Filed: 12/16/19 Entered: 12/16/19 14:50:53 Page 25

of 25
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of E Com Ventures, Inc. (the Company) of Form 10-K for the year
ended February 3, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael W. Katz, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ MICHAEL W. KATZMichael W. KatzPresident and Chief Executive OfficerMay 4, 2007
#### John H. Norwood, Respondent, v. Ray Manufacturing Company, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Opinion by

Barnard, P. J. ;

Pratt, J., not sitting.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

DEVIN COLEMAN, § 

§ No. 576, 2015

Defendant Below, §

Appellant, § Court Below—Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware in and

v. § for Kent County

§

STATE OF DELAWARE, § Cr. ID Nos. 1303004663

§ 1303012706

Plaintiff Below, §

Appellee. §

Submitted: November 10, 2015

Decided: November 16, 2015

O R D E R

This 16th day of November 2015, it appears to the Court that, on 

October 26, 2015, the Clerk issued a notice to show cause, by certified mail, 

directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal from a Superior Court 

Commissioner’s report and recommendation should not be dismissed for the

Court’s lack of jurisdiction to consider a criminal interlocutory appeal. The 

appellant has not responded to the notice to show cause within the required 

ten-day period. Dismissal of the appeal is deemed to be unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 

3(b)(2) and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-8028
EARL THOMAS, III, Petitioner - Appellant, versus GENE JOHNSON, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:05-cv-01259) Submitted: April 26, 2007 Decided: May 2, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Earl Thomas, III, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Bain Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Earl Thomas, III, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Thomas has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and di smiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED