alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001058441
<NAME> RAINBOW RENTALS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             173
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     30,088
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,093
<PP&E>                                           4,220
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,508
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,769
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,039
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,390
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    30,429
<SALES>                                            490
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,311
<CGS>                                            6,765
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,765
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,692
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 191
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,096
<INCOME-TAX>                                       869
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,227
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,227
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to

to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of SAVVIS, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



|(a) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |     |  |                        
|----------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 7, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/ Philip J. Koen     
|                  |  |     |  | Philip J. Koen         
|                  |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer



42
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 243 (Tuesday, December 19, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 65254]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30777]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 1

[Docket No. 25767; Notice No. 95-16]
RIN 2120-AF92

Definitions of Special Use Airspace; Correction

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Correction to the notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to the notice of proposed 
rulemaking (NPRM), 60 FR 58494, published on November 27, 1995. The 
correction to the address in the preamble reads as follows: Comments 
may also be sent electronically to the following Internet address: 
[email protected].

ADDRESSES: Comments on this NPRM should be mailed, in triplicate, to: 
Federal Aviation Administration, Office of the Chief Counsel, 
Attention: Rules Docket (AGC-200), Docket No. 25767, 800 Independence 
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591. Comments may also be sent 
electronically to the following Internet address: 
[email protected]. Comments delivered must be marked Docket No. 
25767. Comments may be examined in Room 915G weekdays between 8:30 a.m. 
and 5 p.m., except on Federal holidays.

    Issued in Washington, DC on December 13, 1995.
Harold W. Becker,
Acting Program Director for Air Traffic Rules and Procedures.
[FR Doc. 95-30777 Filed 12-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 27 (Thursday, February 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7765]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3185]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-151-000]


Trunkline Gas Co.; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

February 3, 1995.
    Take notice that on February 1, 1995, Trunkline Gas Company 
(Trunkline) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheets, with a 
proposed effective date of March 3, 1995:

Second Revised Sheet No. 36
First Revised Sheet No. 57
First Revised Sheet No. 63
Third Revised Sheet No. 162
Second Revised Sheet No. 397

    Trunkline states that these revised tariff sheets update 
Trunkline's tariff for personnel and telephone changes and provide for 
No Notice Service and Small Shipper Transportation service to be 
available to any party that qualifies for the service.
    Trunkline states that copies of this filing are being mailed to all 
affected shippers and interested state regulatory agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 
20426, in accordance with Secs. 385.211 and 385.214 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests should be filed on 
or before February 10, 1995. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-3185 Filed 2-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6993

JOHN WILEY, a/k/a James Harris,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LIEUTENANT TEGETOFF; LIEUTENANT MCKOY; LIEUTENANT NASH; OFFICER CHISLEY; TONY FOREMAN,

Lieutenant,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

CORPORAL MOSBY,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA-95-

2647-CCB)

Submitted: October 17, 1996 Decided: November 1, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Wiley, Appellant Pro Se. Linda B. Thall, Senior Assistant

County Attorney, David Eugene Stevenson, COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE,

Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.
2
3

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the order granting partial summary judgment

to five Defendants; dismissing the claim concerning the denial of

pre-release transfer; denying Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment; allowing the claim of excessive use of force to proceed; and

staying further action in this matter. We dismiss the appeal for

lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This

court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28

U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial

Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is

neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral

order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
|EXHIBIT 23.1


Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-14363; Form S-8 No. 333-19141; Form S-8 No. 333-24329;
 Form S-8 No. 333-35701; Form S-8 No. 333-81783; Form S-8 No. 333-92711; Form S-8 No. 333-48376; Form S-8 No. 333-09090;
Form S-8 No. 333-09092; Form S-8 No. 333-11036; Form S-8 No. 333-68218; Form S-8 No.
333-101048; Form S-8 No. 333-100733; Form S-8 No. 333-100730; Form S-8 No. 333-100729 and
Form S-3 No. 333-91449) of Dendrite International, Inc. of our report dated January 29, 2003,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Dendrite International, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 2002.
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
| |  | ---------------------

|MetroPark, New Jersey
March 25, 2003
|------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Acorn Energy,Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission(the “Report”), I, John A. Moore, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

1.          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3313 

To amend the Consolidated Natural Resources Act of 2008 to extend the 

authorization of financial assistance with respect to the Abraham Lincoln 

National Heritage Area. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 6, 2021 

Mr. DURBIN (for himself and Ms. DUCKWORTH) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Consolidated Natural Resources Act of 2008 

to extend the authorization of financial assistance with 

respect to the Abraham Lincoln National Heritage Area. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ABRAHAM LINCOLN NATIONAL HERITAGE 

4 AREA. 

5 Section 451 of the Consolidated Natural Resources 

6 Act of 2008 (54 U.S.C. 320101 note; Public Law 110– 

7 229; 122 Stat. 824) is amended by striking ‘‘the date that 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3313 IS

1 is 15 years after the date of the enactment of this sub2 title’’ and inserting ‘‘May 8, 2038’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 1894-207]

Rule 2010 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.2010, provides that, to eliminate unnecessary expense or improve administrative efficiency, the Secretary may establish a restricted service list for a particular phase or issue in a proceeding concerning non-public information. The restricted service list should contain the names of persons on the service list who, in the judgment of the decisional authority establishing the list, are active participants with respect to the phase or issue in the proceeding for which the list is established.

                    The Commission staff is consulting with the Maine Historic Preservation Commission (Maine SHPO) and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (Advisory Council) pursuant to the Advisory Council's regulations, 36 CFR part 800, implementing section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act,                     *as amended,*                     (54 U.S.C. 306108), to prepare a Programmatic Agreement for managing properties included in, or eligible for inclusion in, the National Register of Historic Places at the existing Parr Hydroelectric Project.                

On November 18, 2014, Commission staff established a restricted service list for the Parr Hydroelectric Project. Since that time, the U.S. Forest Service requested to supplement the restricted service list because of personnel changes. The restricted service list is supplemented as follows:

Replace “Mike Harmon, U.S. Forest Service” with “James F. Bates or Representative, U.S. Forest Service.”

      ( print page 5732)    
Dated: January 28, 2016.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2016-01957 Filed 2-2-16; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

Wntteb $>tates (!Court of ~peals 

for tbe jf eberal (!Ctrcutt 

YUYAMA MANUFACTURING CO., LTD., 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

JVM CO., LTD., 

Defendant-Appellee. 

2011-1104 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

District of Maryland in No. 06-CV-2536, Judge Marvin J. 

Garbis. 

ORDER 

The appellant having failed to respond to this court's 

June 10, 2013 order, 

IT Is ORDERED THAT: 

The appeal is dismissed. 
YUYAMA MFG CO V. JVM CO LTD 

,July 22. 2013 

Date 

cc: Michael A. O'Shea, Esq. 

William J. O'Brien, Esq. 

s8 

FOR THE COURT 

lsi Daniel E. O'Toole 

Daniel E. O'Toole 

Clerk 

2 

FILED 

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR 

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: July 22. 2013 JUL 2 2 ZOlJ 

DANIEL E. 0700LE 

CLERK
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to the Situation in or in Relation to Côte d'Ivoire

On February 7, 2006, by Executive Order 13396, the President declared a national emergency, pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706), to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States constituted by the situation in or in relation to Côte d'Ivoire and ordered related measures blocking the property of certain persons contributing to the conflict in Côte d'Ivoire. The situation in or in relation to Côte d'Ivoire, which has been addressed by the United Nations Security Council in Resolution 1572 of November 15, 2004, and subsequent resolutions, has resulted in the massacre of large numbers of civilians, widespread human rights abuses, significant political violence and unrest, and fatal attacks against international peacekeeping forces.

The Government of Côte d'Ivoire and its people continue to make significant progress in promotion of democratic, social, and economic development. We congratulate Côte d'Ivoire on holding a peaceful and credible presidential election, which represents an important milestone on the country's road to full recovery. The United States also supports the advancement of national reconciliation and impartial justice in Côte d'Ivoire. The United States is committed to helping Côte d'Ivoire strengthen its democracy and stay on the path of peaceful democratic transition, and we look forward to working with the Government and people of Côte d'Ivoire to ensure continued progress and lasting peace for all Ivoirians.

While the Government of Côte d'Ivoire and its people continue to make progress towards consolidating democratic gains and peace and prosperity, the situation in or in relation to Côte d'Ivoire continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States. For this reason, the national emergency declared on February 7, 2006, and the measures adopted on that date to deal with that emergency, must continue in effect beyond February 7, 2016. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13396.

                    This notice shall be published in the                     *Federal Register*                     and transmitted to the Congress.                

[FR Doc. 2016-02429

Billing code 3295-F6-P
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES -OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 I, James A. Winne III, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Belden & Blake Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: March 31, 2005

/s/ James A. Winne IIIJames A. Winne III, Chief Executive Officer andChairman of the Board of Directors
Order filed February 13, 2018

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 17

- 00931

- CV

____________ NINA GARZA , Appellant

V.

MOMENTUM AUDI D/B/A AUDI CENTRAL HOUSTON , Appellee

On Appeal from the 61st District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2015

- 37157



### ORDER
The notice of appeal in this case was filed November 29, 2017 . The clerk responsible for preparing the record notified this court that appellant had not made payment for the record. No evidence that appellant has established indigence has
been filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1. On January 11, 2018 , this court notified appellant that the appeal was subject to dismissal unless appellant filed a response with proof of payment for the record. No response was filed. Therefore, the court issues the following order.Appellant is ordered to demonstrate to this court that she has made

arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record on or before February 28, 2018

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). If appellant fails to do so , the appeal will be dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

PER CURIAM