alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

EX PARTE: KELSEY FIELDS,

 

 Appellant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-18-00121-CR

Appeal from the

384th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20170D03143 & 2018DCV2228)

O R D E R

 

Kelsey Fields is appealing an order denying her petition for writ of habeas corpus filed in 

a criminal case, cause number 20170D03143, styled The State of Texas v. Kelsey Fields. The 

District Clerk’s Office assigned the case a civil number cause number, 2018DCV2228. On July 

5, 2018, the trial court signed an order denying the petition and the order was filed in cause number 

2018DCV2228. Appellant subsequently filed notices of appeal in both cause number 

20170D03143 and 2018DCV2228. This Court filed each notice of appeal in a separate appellate 

cause number (cause numbers 08-18-00120-CR and 08-18-00121-CR). We have determined that 

it is necessary to consolidate the appeals into one cause. It is therefore ordered that cause number 

08-18-00120-CR be consolidated with cause number 08-18-00121-CR, and cause number 08-18-

00120-CR shall be dismissed due to consolidation. The notice of appeal filed in cause number 08-

18-00120-CR shall be filed as an amended notice of appeal in cause number 08-18-00121-CR. 

The record is due to be filed on September 3, 2018. 

 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 13

th day of July, 2018.

 

 PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# PHOTOS ANDVIDEOS

Search

Search

                                - All Images 
                                - Other 
                                - Space Shuttle 

                                - Upload Date
                                - Photo Date
                                - Title

----

Download Image: Full Size (1.49 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 245 (Thursday, December 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 66275]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31041]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Freight Forwarder License; Revocations

    The Federal Maritime Commission hereby gives notice that the 
following freight forwarder licenses are revoked pursuant to section 19 
of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. app. 1718) and the regulations 
of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of ocean freight 
forwarders, effective on the corresponding revocation dates shown 
below:

Lecense Number: 3788
Name: Global Maritime, Inc.
Address: 421 S. 9th Street, Suite 117, Lincoln, NE 68508
Date Revoked: November 28, 1995
Reason: Failed to maintain a valid surety bond.

Lecense Number: 2142
Name: All Transport, Inc.
Address: 6510 N.W. 84th Ave., Miami, FL 33166
Date Revoked: December 6, 1995
Reason: Failed to maintain a valid surety bond.

Lecense Number: 1814
Name: Vijaya Maldonado dba General Cargo International Forwarders
Address: 12322 SW 10 Lane, Miami, FL 33184
Date Revoked: December 8, 1995
Reason: Surrendered license voluntarily.
Bryant L. VanBrakle,
Director, Bureau of Tariffs, Certification and Licensing.
[FR Doc. 95-31041 Filed 12-20-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 245 (Thursday, December 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 66255]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31107]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ARCHITECTURAL AND TRANSPORTATION BARRIERS COMPLIANCE BOARD


Meeting

Agency: Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board.

Action: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Summary: The Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board 
(Access Board) has scheduled its regular business meetings to take 
place in Washington, DC on Tuesday and Wednesday, January 9-10, 1996 at 
the times and location noted below.

Dates: The schedule of events is as follows:

Tuesday, January 9, 1996

9:00 am-10:30 am   Briefing on Rulemaking (Closed Session)
10:45 am-12:00 Noon  Planning and Budget Committee
1:30 pm-3:15 pm   Vision Statement Work Group
3:30 pm-5:00 pm   Technical Programs Committee

Wednesday, January 10, 1996

9:00 am-12:00 Noon  Ad Hoc Committee on Bylaws and Statutory Review
1:30 pm-3:30 pm   Board Meeting

Addresses: The meetings will be held at: Marriott at Metro Center, 775 
12th Street, NW., Washington, DC.

For Further Information Contact: For further information regarding the 
meetings, please contact Lawrence W. Roffee, Executive Director, (202) 
272-5434 ext. 14 (voice) and (202) 272-5449 (TTY).

Supplementary Information: At the Board meeting, the Access Board will 
consider the following agenda items:
    <bullet> Approval of the Minutes of the July 12 and September 14 
Board Meetings.
    <bullet> Executive Director's Report.
    <bullet> Vision Statement Work Group Report.
    <bullet> Ad Hoc Committee on Bylaws and Statutory Review Report.
    <bullet> Fiscal Year 1996 Spending Plan.
    <bullet> Fiscal Year 1997 Budget Request.
    <bullet> Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995 Research Projects Status.
    <bullet> Fiscal Year 1996 Research Projects.
    <bullet> Extension of Detectable Warnings Suspension.
    <bullet> Election of Officers.
    All meeting are accessible to persons with disabilities. Sign 
language interpreters and an assistive listening system are available 
at all meetings.
Lawrence W. Roffee,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 95-31107 Filed 12-20-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8150-01-M
Exhibit 31.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to

§240.13a14 or §240.15d14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

I, Thomas C. Varvaro., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10K of ChromaDex Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. [Intentionally Omitted]

4. [Intentionally Omitted]

5. [Intentionally Omitted]

Date: April 30, 2010



/s/ THOMAS C. VARVAROThomas C. VarvaroChief Financial Officer
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 4.49 7.51 125% 173%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

September 15, 2023

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable)

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: E1.2. Increase the payroll tax rate (currently 12.4 percent) to 16.2 percent in 2034-

2063, and to 20.0 percent in years 2064 and later.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

22.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7747

ATARAH MCQUINN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DAVID E. BOONE, Esq.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior

District Judge. (3:07-cv-00465-REP)

Submitted: May 29, 2008 Decided: June 4, 2008

Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Atarah McQuinn, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Atarah McQuinn appeals the district court’s order

dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000) her complaint

filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau

of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and

find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. McQuinn v.

Boone, No. 3:07-cv-00465-REP (E.D. Va. Nov. 13, 2007). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### F. T. COLLINS v. J. A. VEAZY et al.

(Filed 26 October, 1932.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *Small, J.,*at August Term, 1932, of Hoke,

Affirmed.

This action involves an accounting between the plaintiff, a landlord, and the defendant, his tenant, and the intervener, who claims under an agricultural lien executed by the tenant, and a release by the landlord of his lien upon certain crops.

From judgment on the facts admitted in the pleadings and at the trial, the plaintiff appealed to the Supreme Court.

*Arthur D. Gore and H. W. B. Whitley for plaintiff.*

*Lutterloh & Lilly for intervener.*

Per Curiam.

We find no error in the trial of this action. The judgment is

Affirmed.
### Proposed Provision: A3. Starting December 2024, compute the COLA using a chained version of the consumer price index for wage and salary workers (CPI-W). We estimate this new computation will reduce the annual COLA by about 0.3 percentage point, on average.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20 - 0 302 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. BRANDON JAMES LEWIS TOLLIE,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including January 13, 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 7 2020

12/07/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0302
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 242 (Monday, December 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 65061]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30619]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP96-94-000]


East Tennessee Natural Gas Company; Notice of Request Under 
Blanket Authorization

December 12, 1995.
    Take notice that on December 4, 1995, East Tennessee Natural Gas 
Company (East Tennessee), Post Office Box 2511, Houston, Texas 77252, 
filed a request with the Commission in Docket No. CP96-94-000 pursuant 
to Sections 157.205, 157.212 and 157.216(b) of the Commission's 
Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (NGA) for authorization to 
establish a bi-directional point and to abandon certain facilities, 
authorized in blanket certificate issued in CP82-412-000, all as more 
fully set forth in the request on file with the Commission and open to 
public inspection.
    At the request of Citizens Gas Utility (Citizens), East Tennessee 
proposes to modify an existing receipt meter station on its system to 
establish a bi-directional point for both receipts from and deliveries 
to Citizens to accommodate a gas storage facility operated by Citizens. 
To accomplish this, East Tennessee proposes to convert their existing 
station (#75-9123 ``Citizens Gas'') by abandoning the receipt meter and 
removing it. East Tennessee would then install the requested bi-
directional meter (#75-9012 ``Morgan County No. 1'') by installing two 
4-inch meter tubes in parallel to the existing tube. East Tennessee 
states that they would continue to own, operate, and maintain the 
existing side valve measurement. The meter station would be located on 
the existing site provided by Citizens adjacent to the right-of-way.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after the 
Commission has issued this notice, file pursuant to Rule 214 of the 
Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to intervene or 
notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of the 
Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to the request. If 
no protest is filed within the allowed time, the proposed activity 
shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day after the time 
allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and not withdrawn 
within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a protest, the instant 
request shall be treated as an application for authorization pursuant 
to Section 7 of the NGA.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-30619 Filed 12-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.2


                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of E Com Ventures,  Inc. (the "Company") of
Form 10-K for the year ending January 29, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, A. Mark Young, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
      Company.


                                            By: /s/ A. Mark Young
                                                -----------------------
                                                A. Mark Young
                                                Chief Financial Officer
                                                April 27, 2005
#### BESSIE PENLAND v. FRENCH BROAD HOSPITAL, Incorporated.

(Filed 21 December, 1932.)

Appeal and Error L c — Judgment in this case is affirmed, the sufficiency of the evidence having been passed upon on former appeal.

Where upon a former appeal the Supreme Court has ordered a new trial for error *in the trial*court’s refusal *to*direct a verdict in defendant’s favor for the reason that the plaintiff’s evidence was insufficient to entitle her to recover, and upon a subsequent trial the evidence is substantially the same, a judgment as of nonsuit entered upon the second trial will be affirmed on appeal in accordance with the decision on the former appeal.

*734Appeal by plaintiff from *Clement, J.,*at February Term, 1932, of YaNcey.

Affirmed.

This is an action to recover damages alleged to bave been caused by the negligent performance of an operation on the person of the plaintiff by a surgeon employed by the defendant to perform the operation.

All the allegations in the complaint, which constitute the cause of action alleged therein, are denied in the answer.

At the close of the evidence for the plaintiff, the defendant moved for judgment as of nonsuit. The motion was allowed, and plaintiff duly excepted. C. S., 567.

From judgment dismissing the action, the plaintiff appealed to the Supreme Court.

*J. W. Pless, Charles Hutchins, and*(?. *JD. Bailey for plaintiff.*

*Harkins, Van Winkle & Walton for defendant.*

Connor, J.

This action was first tried at January Term, 1930, of the Superior Court of Yancey County. From the judgment at said trial, the defendant appealed to the Supreme Court. This appeal was heard at Spring Term, 1930, of this Court. Defendant’s contention on said appeal that there was error in the refusal of the trial court to allow its motion for judgment as of nonsuit was not considered for the reason that this contention was not duly presented by exceptions taken at the trial. Its contention that there was error in the refusal of the court to instruct the jury in accordance with its request to answer the first issue “No” was sustained and a new trial ordered. ¥e were of opinion that upon all the evidence introduced at the trial, plaintiff was not entitled to recover in this action. *Penland v. Hospital,*199 N. C., 314, 154 S. E., 406.

This appeal is from the judgment rendered at February Term, 1932, of the Superior Court of Yancey County, dismissing the action as of nonsuit. Plaintiff contends that there was error in the judgment for that the evidence introduced by her was sufficient to show the facts to be as alleged in her complaint, and that this evidence should have been submitted to the jury. The evidence was substantially the same as that offered by the plaintiff at the former trial. For this reason, plaintiff’s contention cannot be sustained. In accordance with the decision on the former appeal, the judgment dismissing the action as of nonsuit is

Affirmed.
#### W. C. Goudy v. The City of Lake View.

*Municipal Corporations—Streets—Condemnation of Private Property for—Freeholds—Jurisdiction.*

This court has no jurisdiction of a controversy involving a freehold estate.

*653[Opinion filed April 3, 1889.]

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Joseph E. Gary, Judge, presiding.

Mr. A. W. Green, for appellant.

Mr. H. H. Anderson, for appellee.

Moran, J.

The appeal in this 'case is prosecuted from a judgment rendered in a condemnation proceeding in which a portion of appellant’s lot was taken for a public highway.

The right sought by the condemnation was that of perpetual easement in favor of the public upon the appellant’s land. The case involves a freehold, and this court has no jurisdiction to investigate the merits or determine the controversy. Chaplin v. Commissioners of Highways, 18 H. E. Hep. 965. The appeal will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Gary, J., takes no part in this case.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4428 Filed: 10/23/19 Entered: 10/23/19 13:08:47 Page 1 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4428 Filed: 10/23/19 Entered: 10/23/19 13:08:47 Page 2 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4428 Filed: 10/23/19 Entered: 10/23/19 13:08:47 Page 3 of

3
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21A1327. MALOY BROOKS v. THE STATE.

In 2015, MaloyBrooks was convicted of two counts of entering an automobile

and one count of theft by taking, and he was sentenced to five years to serve on each

count, to run consecutively. Brooks later filed a motion to void and vacate a null

sentence. On December 9, 2020, the trial court entered an order denying the motion,

and on February 3, 2021, Brooks filed a notice of appeal to this Court. We lack

jurisdiction.

Pretermitting whether Brooks had a right of direct appeal here, his notice of

appeal was not timely filed. A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of the

entry of an appealable judgment. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely filing

of a notice of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction on this Court.

Rowland v. State, 264 Ga. 872, 872 (1) (452 SE2d 756) (1995). Here, Brooks filed

his notice of appeal 56 days after entry of the trial court’s order. Thus, this appeal is

hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

April 27, 2021

04/27/2021