alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Tiffany Bosley

Office of the Chief AcSocial Security Admin

Retirement Age Proposals

National Academy of Social Insurance

2018 Summer Intern Academy

August 1, 2018
What is the Social Security 

Retirement Age Anyway? 

 At full retirement age, also called “normal re

age” or NRA, the full basic Social Security bpaid (Primary Insurance Amount or PIA):

 For individuals age 62 in 2016, the NRA is 6

– Can file for retirement benefits as early as 62 with 

reduction of the PIA – age 62 is called the earliesage or EEA

– Can file for retirement benefits at age 70 or later w

benefit increase, 8% per year of delay in filing for 

– Those benefit reductions/increases are permanen

annual cost of living adjustments
Brief History of NRA and EEA

 1935 – NRA established at 65 and all got the s

basic benefit regardless of age at retirement – at this time

 1956 – Women could get benefits as early as 

reduction of 6.67% of the PIA per year of early retirement

 1961 – Same action for men as in 1956 for wo 1972 – First allowed for increases in PIA for re

after NRA (was up to 72 at the time, later redu

 1983 – Increased NRA to 66 by 2005 and to 6
Retirement Age Proposals

 Some NRA provisions attempt to keep the ratio 

in retirement (life expectancy) to time in the wor(NRA – 20) constant

– We estimate this would result in increasing th

month every 2 years after it reaches age 67

 Other provisions raise NRA faster than this
Retirement Age Proposals (exam

 From recent/notable comprehensive solvency p

– Rep. Johnson (Dec 8, 2016) = increase NRA 3 m

year from 2023 to 2030, reaching 69 for age 62/2Reduces 32% of financing gap.

– Rep. Ribble (July 13, 2016) = increase NRA 2 mo

year from 2023 to 2034, reaching 69 for age 62/2increase 1 month/2 years thereafter. Reduces 4financing gap.

– Fiscal Commission (December 1, 2010) = after 20

increase EEA and NRA about 1 month / 2 years. limit these increases for those with career averagup to 400% of the poverty level. Reduces 15% of gap.
Implications of Raising NRA/

 If no change in time of retirement, benefits a

reduced

 Would have to delay retirement by some am

time to get the same benefit

 Raises in EEA alone are close to neutral in t

solvency effects on Social Security

 Raising the NRA would extend payments m

Disability Insurance Trust Fund, and would ladditional filing of (unreduced) disability ben
Implications (continued)

 Workers are living longer, healthier lives

– Workers are able to remain longer in the wor– Workers will need more time to save for a lon

generally healthier retirement

 Possible difficulties

– Will workers want to remain longer in the lab– Will more jobs be available for older workers– Will older workers in strenuous jobs be adve

affected – not quite meeting disability status Security standards
Resources

 https://www.ssa.gov/OACT/solvency/provisions/retirea

Individual provisions to increase the EEA anNRA 

 https://www.ssa.gov/OACT/solvency/index.html = 

Comprehensive solvency memoranda from Othe Chief Actuary
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 247 (Tuesday, December 26, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66796-66797]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31240]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Science Board Task Force on Logistics Modernization

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee Meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Logistics 
Modernization will meet in closed session on January 9-10, and February 
5-6 1996 at the Institute for Defense Analyses, Alexandria, Virginia.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Technology 

[[Page 66797]]
on scientific and technical matters as they affect the perceived needs 
of the Department of Defense. At these meetings the Task Force will 
address the technologies that will affect the cost of ownership for 
current and future weapon systems. The Task Force should address the 
following questions: What logistics related technology opportunities 
are available to reduce costs while providing enhanced readiness, 
deployability and sustainment? What investment strategy is required to 
achieve the desired level of logistics cost reduction?
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II, (1988)), it has 
been determined that these DSB Task Force meetings concern matters 
listed in 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552b(c)(1) (1988), and that accordingly these 
meetings will be closed to the public.

    Dated: December 19, 1995.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
FR Doc. 95-31240 Filed 12-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 0.26 0.30 7% 7%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

September 15, 2023

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable)

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: E3.9. Beginning in 2031, apply 2 percent payroll tax rate on earnings over the wageindexed equivalent of $200,000 in 2017 (about $348,300 in 2031), with the threshold wage-indexed after 

2031. Do not provide benefit credit for additional earnings taxed.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 21 (Tuesday, February 2, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 5489]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02015]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meetings; National Science Board

    The National Science Board (NSB), pursuant to National Science 
Foundation (NSF) regulations (45 CFR part 614), the National Science 
Foundation Act, as amended, (42 U.S.C. 1862n-5), and the Government in 
the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice of a cancellation 
of one session and the addition of an agenda item in a plenary session 
during the National Science Board meetings on February 2-3, 2016, as 
shown below. The original notice appeared in the Federal Register on 
January 29, 2016 at 81 FR 70259.

Cancelled Session: 

Plenary Board Meeting

Open Session: 11:30-11:45 a.m.

NSB Chair's remarks
Guest speaker--Senator Gary Peters
NSB Chair's closing remarks

Amended Agenda: 

Plenary Board Meeting

Open Session: 1:00-1:30 p.m.

NSB Chair's remarks
NSF Director's remarks
Approval of open plenary minutes for November 2015
NEON update from the Chair of the ad hoc task force on NEON Performance 
and Plans
Open committee reports
Possible Board Vote on SEI's Recommendations, including draft Companion 
Brief and sense of the Board Statement on the Value of Higher Education 
[ADDED]
NSB Chair's closing remarks

UPDATES: Please refer to the National Science Board Web site for 
additional information. Meeting information and schedule updates (time, 
place, subject matter or status of meeting) may be found at http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/meetings/notices.jsp.

AGENCY CONTACT: Ron Campbell, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#573d2534363a2735321739243179303821"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="80eaf2e3e1edf0e2e5c0eef3e6aee7eff6">[email protected]</span></a>, 703-292-7000.

Kyscha Slater-Williams,
Program Specialist, National Science Board.
[FR Doc. 2016-02015 Filed 1-29-16; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 243 (Tuesday, December 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 65376]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30778]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Air Traffic Procedures Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public that a 
meeting of the Federal Aviation Administration Air Traffic Procedures 
Advisory Committee (ATPAC) will be held to review present air traffic 
control procedures and practices for standardization, clarification, 
and upgrading of terminology and procedures.

DATES: The meeting will be held from January 22 through January 25, 
1996, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. each day.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Le Baron Hotel, 1350 N First 
Street, San Jose, CA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. W. Frank Price, Executive 
Director, ATPAC, Air Traffic Rules and Procedures, 800 Independence 
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591, telephone (202) 267-3725.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463; 5 U.S.C. App. 2), notice is 
hereby given of a meeting of the ATPAC to be held January 22 through 
January 25, 1996, at the Le Baron Hotel, 1350 N First Street, San Jose, 
California
    The agenda for this meeting will cover: a continuation of the 
Committee's review of present air traffic control procedures and 
practices for standardization, clarification, and upgrading of 
terminology and procedures. It will also include:

1. Approval of Minutes.
2. Submission and Discussion of Areas of Concern.
3. Discussion of Potential Safety Items.
4. Report from Executive Director.
5. Items of Interest.
6. Discussion and agreement of location and dates for subsequent 
meetings.

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to the 
space available. With the approval of the Chairperson, members of the 
public may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons desiring to 
attend and persons desiring to present oral statements should notify 
the person listed above not later than January 19, 1996. The next 
quarterly meeting of the FAA ATPAC is planned to be held from April 15-
18, 1996, in Washington, DC.
    Any member of the public may present a written statement to the 
Committee at any time at the address given above.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on December 13, 1995.
W. Frank Price,
Executive Director, Air Traffic Procedures Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 95-30778 Filed 12-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
#### HUGH T. *TYLER v.*ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY.

(Filed 26 October, 1927.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *Bond, J.,*at February Term, 1927, of New IIanovek.

Affirmed.

*Hugh N. Pace aind Rogers & Rogers for plaintiff.*

*Rountree & Carr and L. J. Poisson for defendant.*

Pee Cubiam.

The defendant was engaged in the construction of a coal chute. (1) Plaintiff and three others were engaged in carrying wooden sills of ordinary pine covered with creosote, weighing 1,060 *801pounds, 16 to 18 feet long, 12 x 12, over soft and sandy ground and bigb embankments, two in front and two behind. Lug hooks were used. The negligence alleged was insufficient help, additional aid requested and refused by defendant. The plaintiff’s back was injured by the heavy strain. (2) Following this plaintiff was ordered to work on another job handling a heavy iron roller 300 or 400 pounds weight. The negligence alleged was also insufficient help and additional aid requested and refused by defendant. Plaintiff alleges from the two causes of actionable negligence he was -permanently injured. Defendant in answer denies the material allegations of the complaint and alleges that at the time of plaintiff’s alleged injury it was engaged in interstate commerce and the question of actionable negligence is regulated and controlled by the Federal Employer’s Liability Act. It denied any negligence and pleads assumption of risk and contributory negligence. It was conceded that the actionable negligence, if any, was controlled by the Federal Employers’ Liability Act. We have examined the record carefully and the briefs of plaintiff and defendant. We have heard the oral argument of the learned counsel in the cause. From the testimony of plaintiff and his witnesses we do not think the evidence sustains the allegations of the complaint of plaintiff alleging actionable negligence in the two particulars set out and sufficient to be submitted to a jury.

At the close of the plaintiff’s evidence the defendant moved for judgment as in case of nonsuit. C. S., 567. The court below granted the motion which we think correct in law. The judgment is

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3430 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3430

 To maintain the National Coal Council in the Department of Energy to 
   provide advice and recommendations to the Secretary of Energy on 
matters relating to coal and the coal industry, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 16, 2021

  Mr. Hoeven (for himself, Mr. Barrasso, Mrs. Capito, Mr. Cramer, Mr. 
 Daines, Mr. Lankford, and Ms. Lummis) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To maintain the National Coal Council in the Department of Energy to 
   provide advice and recommendations to the Secretary of Energy on 
matters relating to coal and the coal industry, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Coal Council Certainty Act of 
2021''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL COAL COUNCIL.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Energy shall maintain the 
National Coal Council, in accordance with the charter for the National 
Coal Council (as filed with Congress on November 19, 2021).
    (b) Applicability of the Federal Advisory Committee Act.--
            (1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), the Federal 
        Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall apply to the 
        National Coal Council.
            (2) Termination.--Section 14 of the Federal Advisory 
        Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall not apply to the National 
        Coal Council.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE v. LAURA JACKSON.

(Filed 14 October, 1925.)

Appeal by defendant from Wake. *Dunn, J.*

Indictment against the defendant, under C. S., 4358. From a judg- . ment rendered on a verdict of guilty, defendant appealed. No error.

*Attorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.*

*F. T. Bennett for defendant.*

Pee Oueiam.

The evidence was submitted to the jury and there were no objections, except to the competency of the evidence as to reputation. This evidence was certainly competent, as held in *S. v. Brice,*175 N. C., 804. Whether this evidence is supporting evidence or substantive evi*863dence of the allegations in the bill of indictment, is not presented,- since there was no request to limit the purposes for which it might be considered. The sufficiency of the evidence to support a verdict against the defendant, not having been raised in the court below in any of the accepted ways, cannot be raised here for the fii’st time. This question must be raised before verdict. *S. v. Hart,*116 N. C., 976; *S. v. Kiger,*115 N. C., 746; *S. v. Varner,*115 N. C., 744; *S. v. Braddy,*104 N. C., 737.

The exceptions for failure to charge the jury upon a given aspect of the evidence is not error when no written request is made in apt time. *S. v. Hart, supra.*

There is

No error.
## Summary Measures and Graphs

- Individual Provisions
- Retirement Age

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						C1.3: Starting for those age 62 in 2024, index the normal retirement age (NRA) to maintain a constant ratio of expected retirement years (life expectancy at NRA) to potential work years (NRA minus 20). We assume the NRA will increase 1 month every 2 years.**

|  |  |
|--|--|
### Proposed Provision: B1.2. Progressive price indexing (30th percentile) of PIA factors beginning with individuals newly eligible for OASDI benefits in 2030: Create a new bend point at the 30th percentile of the AIME distribution of newly retired workers. Maintain current-law benefits for earners at the 30th percentile and below. Reduce the 32 and 15 percent factors above the 30th percentile such that the initial benefit for a worker with AIME equal to the taxable maximum grows by inflation rather than the growth in the SSA average wage index.

back
Exhibit 4.4


 


CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT


OF


CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION


 


Atlis Motor Vehicles Inc. a corporation
organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.


 


DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:


 


FIRST: That at a meeting of the Board of Directors
of Atlis Motor Vehicles Inc. resolutions were duly adopted setting forth a proposed amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of
said corporation, declaring said amendment to be advisable and calling a meeting of the stockholders of said corporation for consideration
thereof. The resolution setting forth the proposed amendment is as follows:


 


RESOLVED, that the Certificate of Incorporation
of this corporation be amended by changing the Article thereof numbered “FOURTH:” so that, as amended said Article shall
be and read as follows:


 


“The total number of
shares of stock which the corporation is authorized to issue is 60,000,000 shares of common stock having a par value of $0.0001 per share.”


 


SECOND: That thereafter, pursuant to resolution
of its Board of Directors, a special meeting of the stockholders of said corporation was duly called and held, upon notice in accordance
with Section 222 of the General Corporation law of the State of Delaware at which meeting the necessary number of shares as required
by statute were voted in favor of the amendment.


 


THIRD: That said amendment was duly adopted in
accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said Atlis Motor Vehicles
Inc. has caused this certificate to be signed by an authorized officer, this 22 day of January         
, 2020.


 


 


		BY:	/s/
                                            Mark Hanchett	- Signature
	 	 	 	 
	 	Name:	Mark
                                            Hanchett	-please print
	 	 	Authorized Officer
## Detailed Single Year Tables

- Individual Provisions
- Cost-of-Living Adjustment

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						A9: For single/head-of-household/married-filing-separate taxpayers with modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) below $108,700 and for joint filers with MAGI below $217,400 for December 2025 ($85,000 and $170,000 multiplied by estimated CPI-U for 2018-2025), use the chain-weighted version of the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (C-CPI-U) to calculate the cost-of-living adjustment (COLA), beginning with the December 2025 COLA. For those beneficiaries whose MAGI is above these thresholds, provide no COLA. Use prior tax year income data for this determination. Use the chain-weighted CPI for the COLA for years prior to benefit receipt. Index the eligibility income threshold amounts to the CPI-U after December 2025.**

### Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program

### Summarized Estimates
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4597    Filed: 11/07/19    Entered: 11/07/19 14:01:20    Page 1 of2

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4597    Filed: 11/07/19    Entered: 11/07/19 14:01:20    Page 2 of2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION, 

- and -

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, 

Debtors.

Bankruptcy Case

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Chapter 11

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Sonia Akter, do declare and state as follows: 

1. I am employed at Prime Clerk LLC (“Prime Clerk”), the claims and noticing agent

for the debtors in the above-referenced chapter 11 bankruptcy cases.

2. On December 2, 2019, at my direction and under my supervision, employees of Prime

Clerk caused the following document to be served via First Class Mail on the Notice Parties Service 

List attached hereto as Exhibit A:

• Notice of Rate Increase of Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP as Attorneys to the Debtors and

Debtors in Possession for Certain Matters [Docket No. 4922]

3. I have reviewed the Notices of Electronic Filing for the above-listed documents, and I

understand that parties listed in each NEF as having received notice through electronic mail were 

electronically served with that document through the Court’s Electronic Case Filing system. 

4. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America,

that the foregoing is true and correct and that if called upon as a witness, I could and would 

competently testify thereto. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4978 Filed: 12/04/19 Entered: 12/04/19 15:17:28 Page 1 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4978 Filed: 12/04/19 Entered: 12/04/19 15:17:28 Page 2 of

4
Exhibit A 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4978 Filed: 12/04/19 Entered: 12/04/19 15:17:28 Page 3 of

4
Exhibit A

Notice Parties Service List

Served via First Class Mail

NAME NOTICE NAME ADDRESS 1 ADDRESS 2 C

PG&E Corporation c/o Pacific Gas & Electric Company Attn: Janet Loduca 77 Beale Street San Fr

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP

Attn: Stephen Karotkin, Jessica Liou,Matthew Goren 767 Fifth Avenue New Y

The Office of the United States Trustee

for Region 17

Attn: Andrew Vara,

Timothy Laffredi

450 Golden Gate

Avenue, 5th Floor Suite #05‐0153 San Fr

Milbank LLP

Attn: Dennis F. Dunne,

Sam A. Khalil 55 Hudson Yards New Y

Milbank LLP

Attn: Paul S. Aronzon,

Gregory A. Bray,

Thomas R. Kreller 2029 Century Park East 33rd Floor Los An

Baker & Hostetler LLP

Attn: Eric Sagerman,

Cecily Dumas

11601 Wilshire

Boulevard Suite 1400 Los An

Bruce Markell, Fee Examiner c/o Scott McNutt 324 Warren Road San M

In re: PG&E Corporation, et al.

Case No. 19‐30088 (DM) Page 1 of 1

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4978 Filed: 12/04/19 Entered: 12/04/19 15:17:28 Page 

4