alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# PHOTOS ANDVIDEOS

Search

Search

                                - All Images 
                                - Other 
                                - Space Shuttle 

                                - Upload Date
                                - Photo Date
                                - Title

----

Download Image: Full Size (1.82 MB)

Tags:Space Command, Air Force Academy, USAFA, USSPACECOM

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF CLIFTON GUNDERSON LLP





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the prospectuses constituting part of the registration statements on Form S-3 for the CSB Bancorp, Inc. Share Owner Dividend Reinvestment Plan and on Form S-8 for The Commercial & Savings Bank of Millersburg Profit Sharing and 401(k) Savings Retirement Plan and Trust of our report dated January 31, 2003 on the consolidated balance sheet of CSB Bancorp, Inc. as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders equity and cash flows for the years then ended, which report is incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K.





/s/   CLIFTON GUNDERSON LLP

CLIFTON GUNDERSON LLP





Toledo, Ohio

March 28, 2003
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas October 11, 2022 No. 04-22-00259-CR EX PARTE Juan Gabriel COLORADO CARRILLO , From the County Court, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10367CR Honorable Roland Andrade, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R Appellant filed his reply brief on September 26, 2022, and an amended motion to exceed the word limit on September 27, 2022. Appellant’s amended motion for leave to exceed word limit is GRANTED.
It is so ORDERED on October 11, 2022. PER CURIAM
ATTESTED TO:__________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, CLERK OF COURT
Exhibit 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

          We consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 33-48364), (ii) the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (File No. 33-66306) and (iii) the Registration Statement on Form S-3
(File No. 33-59734) of our reports dated August 14, 1998, except for Note 21 as
to which the date is September 2, 1998, on our audits of the consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedule of Pharmaceutical
Marketing Services Inc. and Subsidiaries as of June 30, 1997 and 1998, and the
years ended June 30, 1996, 1997 and 1998, which reports are included in this
Form 10-K.




                                        PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP



Stamford, Connecticut
November 19, 1998
## Summary Measures and Graphs

- Individual Provisions
- Level of Monthly Benefits

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						B4.4: Reduce the number of computation years (increase dropout years) for parents having a child in care under the age of 6. The parent must have no earnings (covered or non-covered) for the year to be eligible for the credit. Only one parent can claim the childcare added dropout year for a given earnings year. Each parent can earn at most 2 dropout years per child, and a maximum of 5 dropout years in total. The years designated as childcare years do not have to be the years that could otherwise be included in the computation of the average indexed monthly earnings (AIME). The provision would be effective for all benefits payable for entitlement in January 2025 and later (without regard for when the beneficiary became initially eligible).**

|  |  |
|--|--|
#### CHAS. T. HAMBY v. LEE A. ALLMAN et al.

(Filed 12 November, 1925.)

Appeal by defendant from *Finley, J.,*at July Term, 1925, of Ashe.

Civil action tried upon the following issue:

“1. Is the defendant, the Callahan Construction Company, indebted to the plaintiff, and if so, in what sum ? Answer: $62.28, with interest.”

Judgment on the verdict for plaintiff, from which the defendant appeals, assigning errors.

*T. G. Bowie for plaintiff.*

*W. JR. Bauguess for defendant, Callahan Construction Company.*

Per Curiam.

The controversy on trial narrowed itself to an issue of fact, which the jury alone could determine. A careful perusal of the record leaves us with the impression that the case has been heard and determined substantially in agreement with the law bearing on the subject, and that the validity of the trial should be sustained. All matters in dispute have been settled by the verdict, and no action or ruling on the part of the trial court has been discovered by us which we apprehend should be held for reversible error.

Plaintiff’s right to recover is not precluded by the statute of frauds, under the jury’s finding that the defendant was a principal debtor. *Taylor v. Lee,*187 N. C., 393.

The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.
#### THOMAS H. CARTER, Deceased; MRS. THOMAS H. CARTER, Widow; MARTHA ANN CARTER, Daughter, v. CAROLINA COACH COMPANY.

(Filed 20 November, 1935.)

Appeal by claimants from *Williams, J.,*at June Term, 1935, of Wake.

This was a proceeding instituted before tbe North Carolina Industrial Commission by tbe dependents of Tbomas H. Carter, deceased, against Carolina Coach Company, for recovery of compensation for bis death, alleged to have been caused by reason of accident arising out of and in tbe course of bis employment as a bus driver by tbe defendant coach company. From an adverse award by tbe Industrial Commission, claimants appealed to tbe Superior Court, and from a judgment affirming tbe award claimants appealed to this Court.

*J. M. Broughton, Geo. D. Tick, Jr., and W. B. Yarborough, Jr., for claimants.*

*Smith, Leach •& Anderson for defendant.*

Pee CuRiam.

It has been uniformly held by this Court that tbe findings of fact of tbe Industrial Commission, if supported by evidence, are conclusive upon appeal. Tbe Full Commission found that *the*death of Tbomas H. Carter was not proximately caused by an injury by accident arising out of nor in tbe course of bis regular employment, and that tbe illness from which be died did not result naturally and unavoidably from an accident.

There was evidence to support this finding. Hence, tbe judgment must be

Affirmed.
EX-10.24






			
	



	  	Exhibit 10.24

  

			
	 March 22, 2022
  
	  	 1700 Broadway
 35th Floor

New York, NY 10019
 T: 212-615-3456

		
	 Rev Renewables, LLC
 575 Fifth Ave, Suite
2501
 New York, New York 10017
  

Ladies and Gentlemen:
	  	  
 One Tower Center Blvd.

21st Floor
 East Brunswick, NJ 08816

T: 732-249-6750

	  
 Reference is made to that certain Transition Services Agreement, dated
as of July 1, 2021 (the “TSA”) between Rev Renewables, LLC (“Rev”) and LSP Generation IV, LLC (“LSP”).
  

The Parties (as defined in the TSA) desire to modify the Transition Services Schedules (as defined in the TSA) such that that the term for Services provided by
(a) Rev to LSP in each place be extended to December 31, 2022 and (b) LSP to Rev in each place where the expiration of such services is December 31, 2022 be extended to December 31, 2023.

 
 The Parties hereto hereby agree to such modification.
	  	 16150 Main Circle Drive
 Suite 310

Chesterfield, MO 63017
 T: 636-532-2200
  
 5000 Hopyard Road

Suite 480
 Pleasanton, CA 94588

T: 925-201-5220


  

			
	Very Truly Yours,
	
	LSP GENERATION IV, LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ John Burke

	Name: John Burke
	Title: Managing Director
	
	Accepted and Agreed:
	
	REV RENEWABLES, LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Kathryn Wilson

	Name: Kathryn Wilson
	Title: SVP, GC & Corp. Secretary
#### Mary Sawyer, Respondent, v. City of Amsterdam, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Landon, J.
Exhibit 32.2











CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











I,  Geoffrey William Smethurst, as the Chief Financial Officer of Consorteum Holdings, Inc., certify that (i) the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Consorteum Holdings, Inc.








/s/  Geoffrey William Smethurst


Geoffrey William Smethurst


Chief  Financial  Officer





November 12,  2010
#### CAROLINA TRANSPORTATION & DISTRIBUTING COMPANY and WOLFE & CRANE COMPANY v. AMERICAN ALLIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY.

(Filed 15 December, 1937.)

Appeal and Error § 2 — Judgment appealed from held not final judgment, and appeal is dismissed as premature.

In this action on a policy of indemnity insurance, insurer’s appeal from judgment of the Superior Court affirming the judgment of the municipal court in insured’s favor, with the modification that an issue as to the amount of the recovery be submitted to a jury, *is held*premature and is dismissed.

Appeal by defendant from *Armstrong, J.,*at March Term, 1937, of Guilpord.

Appeal dismissed.

*Roberson, Haworth & Reese for plaintiffs, appellees.*

*Smith, Wharton & Hudgins for defendant, appellant.*

Per Curiam.

This was an action brought in the municipal court of the city of High Point on an insurance policy issued by the defendant to the transportation company insuring the insured, *inter alia,*against loss by reason of legal liability as a carrier for loss of goods.

On motion of the plaintiffs, judgment on the pleadings was rendered in the municipal court to the effect that the plaintiffs were entitled to *666recover of the defendant the sum of $3,191-10, with interest. To this judgment the defendant excepted and appealed to the Superior Court.

The Superior Court affirmed the judgment of the municipal court with the modification that an issue as to the amount of the recovery should have been submitted to a jury, and remanded the case to the municipal court that such an issue might there be submitted. To this judgment the defendant excepted and appealéd to the Supreme Court.

The judgment from which the defendant appeals to this Court is not a final judgment, and for that reason the appeal is premature, and must be dismissed. *Smith v. Matthews,*203 N. C., 218, and cases there cited.

Appeal dismissed.
1

Order entered August 16, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00521-CV

JEFFREY AGULEFO, Appellant

V.

BANK OF AMERICA, NA, Appellee

On Appeal from the 86th Judicial District Court

Kaufman County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 92509-86

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s second motion to extend time to file appellant’s brief. 

Appellant’s brief shall be filed on or before SEPTEMBER 15, 2016.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS

CHIEF JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 250 (Friday, December 29, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 67388]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31476]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of The Secretary
[Order 95-12-37; Docket OST-95-771]


Application of Laker Airways, Inc. for Certificate Authority

AGENCY: Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice of order to show cause.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation is directing all interested 
persons to show cause why it should not issue an order finding Laker 
Airways, Inc., fit, willing, and able, and awarding it a certificate of 
public convenience and necessity to engage in interstate scheduled air 
transportation of persons, property, and mail.

DATES: Persons wishing to file objections should do so no later than 
January 8, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Objections and answers to objections should be filed in 
Docket OST-95-771 and addressed to the Documentary Services Division 
(C-55, Room PL-401), U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh 
Street SW., Washington, DC 20590 and should be served upon the parties 
listed in Attachment A to the order.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. Carol A. Woods, Air Carrier Fitness Division (X-56, Room 6401), 
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, 
DC 20590, (202) 366-2340.

    Dated: December 22, 1995.
Mark L. Gerchick,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs.
[FR Doc. 95-31476 Filed 12-28-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-M
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

April 1, 2013

p0325

Order 

April 1, 2013

146258 & (9)

RAYMOND LANE,

Plaintiff,

v SC: 146258

AGC: 2186-12

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION,

Defendant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and 

relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested 

relief. The motion for miscellaneous relief is DENIED.
## Summary Measures and Graphs

- Individual Provisions
- Family Members

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						D9: Provide for pro-rata benefit payment for the month of death of a beneficiary, rather than no payment for month of death. For situations where an auxiliary beneficiary is changed from one type of benefit to another upon the death of the worker, benefits for the month of the worker's death would be determined on a pro-rata basis. This provision would apply for deaths in 2024 or later.**

|  |  |
|--|--|
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                      FISHER SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL INC.
                           WORLDWIDE SUBSIDIARY LIST



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              PERCENTAGE           STATE/COUNTRY
                                              OWNERSHIP            INCORPORATION
                                              ----------           -------------
<S>                                          <C>                  <C>

Fisher Scientific Company L.L.C. ...........     100                    Delaware
  Fisher Scientific Limited ................     100                      Canada
Fisher Hamilton Inc. .......................     100                    Delaware
  Systems Manufacturing Corporation ........     100                    Delaware
Applied Scientific Corporation .............     100                  California
Columbia Diagnostics Inc. ..................     100                    Delaware
Alchematrix L.L.C. .........................     100                    Delaware
Fisher Scientific GmbH .....................    94.3                     Germany
Fisher Scientific of the Netherlands B.V. ..     100                 Netherlands
  Fisher Scientific B.V. ...................     100                 Netherlands
Fisher Scientific Worldwide Inc. ...........     100                    Delaware
  Acros Organics N.V. ......................     100                     Belgium
  Fisher Scientific Holding Company ........     100                    Delaware
  Fisher Scientific Holding U.K., Limited ..     100              United Kingdom
    Fisher Scientific U.K., Limited ........     100              United Kingdom
  Fisher Bioblock Scientific S.A. ..........     100                      France
    Fisher Scientific S.A. .................     100                      France

</TABLE>





                                       51
II 

Calendar No. 538 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3450 

[Report No. 117–187] 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to construct, operate, and maintain 

facilities in the Sun River project, Montana, for the purpose of hydroelectric power generation. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 10, 2022 

Mr. DAINES (for himself and Mr. TESTER) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

OCTOBER 18, 2022 

Reported under authority of the order of the Senate of October 14, 2022, by 

Mr. MANCHIN, without amendment 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to construct, operate, and maintain facilities in the Sun River project, 

Montana, for the purpose of hydroelectric power generation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3450 RS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sun River Hydropower 

3 Authorization Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF SUN RIVER PROJECT, MON5 TANA. 

6 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary of the Interior, 

7 acting through the Commissioner of Reclamation and pur8 suant to the reclamation laws, may construct, operate, and 

9 maintain facilities in the Sun River project, Montana, for 

10 the purpose of hydroelectric power generation. 

11 (b) EFFECT.—The authorization under subsection 

12 (a) shall— 

13 (1) be in addition to any other authorizations 

14 for the Sun River project under existing law; and 

15 (2) not limit, restrict, or alter operations of the 

16 Sun River project in a manner that would be ad17 verse to the satisfaction of valid existing water 

18 rights or water deliveries to the holder of any valid 

19 water service contract. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 538 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3450 

[Report No. 117–187] 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conelectric power generation. River project, Montana, for the purpose of hydro- struct, operate, and maintain facilities in the Sun 

OCTOBER 18, 2022 

Reported under authority of the order of the Senate of 

October 14, 2022, without amendment 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

 No. 06-8028 

EARL THOMAS, III,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GENE JOHNSON,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior

District Judge. (1:05-cv-01259)

Submitted: April 26, 2007 Decided: May 2, 2007

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Earl Thomas, III, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Bain Smith, Assistant

Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Earl Thomas, III, seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Thomas has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 21.0
                        Scientific Games Holdings Corp.
                                  Subsidiaries


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   State/jurisdiction
                                                    of incorporation/           Other names under which
Name                                                  organization              business is conducted
---------------------------------                  ------------------           ------------------------------------
<S>                                                <C>                          <C>
Scientific Games Inc.                               Delaware

Scientific Games (Greece), Inc.                     Delaware

GameTec Inc.                                        Delaware                     Scientific Games Acquisition, Inc.

Scientific Games Foreign Sales Corporation          Barbados

Scientific Games International Limited              United Kingdom               Formerly known as Opax International Limited
  Line of business: instant ticket manufacturer
  Number of subsidiaries within US = 0
  Number of subsidiaries outside US = 4

Scientific Games Kommunikations - und               Austria                      Formerly known as TeleControl Kommunikations
  Computersysteme A.G.                                                              und Computersysteme Gesellschaft m.b.h.
 Line of business:  on-line lottery systems
 Number of subsidiaries within US = 0
 Number of subsidiaries outside US = 0
</TABLE>