alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 243 (Tuesday, December 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 65319]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30716]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. GT96-15-000]


Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.; Notice of Refund Report

December 13, 1995.
    Take notice that on October 20, 1995, Iroquois Gas Transmission 
System, L.P. (Iroquois Gas) tendered for filing a refund report 
pursuant to the Commission's February 22, 1995, Order in Docket No. 
RP95-124-000.
    Iroquois Gas states that it received $180,446.00 from Gas Research 
Institute (GRI) in payment of the 1994 Tier 1 refund. Pipelines 
receiving a refund were required to credit such refunds to their 
customers. Iroquois states that it provided credits to its customers in 
the invoices that were remitted on October 6, 1995. Because some of the 
shippers on Iroquois' system did not receive invoices on that date, 
shippers otherwise entitled to credits were issued refund checks. 
Iroquois requests any waivers that may be necessary to permit such a 
result.
    In addition, while the February 22 Order spoke only of credits to 
firm customers, Iroquois had interruptible customers that are entitled 
to credits. Iroquois therefore requests any waivers necessary to 
accomplish this as well; the amount involved is de minimis.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions 
or protests should be filed on or before December 20, 1995. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion 
to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-30716 Filed 12-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 33.4
                                  ------------

                      REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH
               ss.1122(d)(2)(vi), ss.1122(d)(4)(xi) and ss.1122(d)(4)(xii)
                       of REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA
                              FOR THE REPORTING PERIOD
                        JANUARY 1, 2007 TO DECEMBER 31, 2007

American Security Insurance Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and
TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc. (formerly, "Safeco Financial Institution
Solutions, Inc.") (collectively, the "Asserting Party") is responsible for
assessing compliance for the period of January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007
(the "Reporting Period") with the servicing criteria set forth in
ss.1122(d)(2)(vi), ss.1122(d)(4)(xi) and ss.1122(d)(4)(xii) of Title 17,
ss.229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations, (the "Applicable Servicing
Criteria") which the Asserting Party has concluded are applicable to the
insurance escrow servicing activities it performs with respect to all mortgage
backed securities transactions that were registered after January 1, 2006 with
the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933
(the "Platform Transactions"). The Asserting Party used the criteria set forth
in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess the compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria.

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria for the Reporting Period and has identified a material instance of
noncompliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. Specifically, the
Asserting Party did not have, during the Reporting Period, sufficient policies
and procedures to capture the information with respect to the Platform
Transactions necessary to determine compliance with ss.1122(d)(4)(xii).

The Asserting Party has concluded that, with the exception of the aforementioned
material instance of noncompliance, the Asserting Party has complied, in all
material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting
Period with respect to the Platform Transactions.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm,
has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Reporting Period.

American Security Insurance Company
Standard Guaranty Insurance Company
TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc.
(formerly, "Safeco Financial Institution Solutions, Inc.")

/s/ John Frobose
-------------------------
    By:  John Frobose
    Senior Vice President

Date: February 19, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM (A)
RAINTREE RESORTS  INTERNATIONAL,  INC. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
PERIOD  ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH (B) FORM 10-Q/A FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001058736
<NAME>                        RAINTREE RESORTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                           5,111
<SECURITIES>                                     3,587
<RECEIVABLES>                                   78,906
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (8,560)
<INVENTORY>                                        763
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               108,924
<PP&E>                                           7,040
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (2,026)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 152,745
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,377
<BONDS>                                         93,760
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            5,266
<PREFERRED>                                      2,078
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                     (16,024)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   152,745
<SALES>                                         18,010
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,432
<CGS>                                            4,218
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,090
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,579
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,420
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,357
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (313)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        40
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (353)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (353)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.04)



</TABLE>
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 245 (Thursday, December 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 66319]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31058]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[AZ-055-06-1330-00; CAAZCA 36103]

California; Notice of Realty Action: Extension of Deadline for 
Submission of Applications for a Long-Term Recreation Concession Lease 
in Imperial County, California.

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Realty Action.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is announcing the 
extension of the deadline for submission of applications for a long-
term recreation concession lease in support of BLM's recreation 
program, pursuant to the regulations at 43 CFR 2920. The original 
Notice of Realty Action ``Availability of Long-Term Recreation 
Concession Lease in Imperial County, California'' was published in the 
Federal Register, Volume 60, No. 187, pages 49850 through 49851, 
September 27, 1995. The site for the proposed concession is located on 
public lands on the west bank of the Colorado River about 12 miles 
south of Blythe, California, in Imperial County.

DATES: Applications for developing the site will be accepted only at 
the BLM Yuma Resource Area Office, Yuma District, 3150 Winsor Avenue, 
Yuma, AZ 85365, from October 25, 1995, to February 20, 1996. If a 
satisfactory application/proposal is received, selection of the 
successful applicant will be made by March 31, 1996, without further 
publication. Lease issuance will not be simultaneous with final 
selection, but will occur by May 1, 1996, after the term of the lease, 
stipulations, and other items have been agreed upon by BLM and the 
successful applicant.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Area Manager Joy Gilbert or 
Supervisory Lands and Minerals Specialist Pat Boykin, BLM, Yuma 
Resource Area, 3150 Winsor Avenue, Yuma, AZ 85365, (520) 726-6300.

    Dated: December 12, 1995.
Joy Gilbert,
Area Manager, Yuma Resource Area.
[FR Doc. 95-31058 Filed 12-20-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-32-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO\
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Online Vacation Center Holdings Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Edward B. Rudner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: May 15, 2007



/s/ Edward B. Rudner
--------------------
Edward B. Rudner
Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.4

                            ALLEGIANCE TELECOM, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS(LOSS)
                      NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999
                (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 Number of          Percent
                                                                  Shares          Outstanding         Equivalent Shares
                                                                 ---------        -----------         -----------------
<S>                                                             <C>                <C>                 <C>
Prior to Initial Public Offering
  1997 Common Stock Offering                                           639           100.00%                         639

After Initial Public Offering
  1998 Common Stock Offering                                    15,000,000           100.00%                  15,000,000
  Preferred Stock Converted to Common Stock                     60,511,692           100.00%                  60,511,692
  1999 Common Stock Offering                                    21,041,100            59.98%                  12,620,384
  Treasury Shares                                                  (37,968)           79.86%                     (30,320)
  Warrants Exercised                                               540,807            46.78%                     252,975
  Stock Options Exercised                                          116,397            27.51%                      32,019
  Employee Stock Discount Purchase Plan Shares Issued              124,586            76.98%                      95,912
                                                                                                       -----------------
  WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING                                                                         88,483,301

  NET LOSS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK                                                                  $    (154,775,000)

  NET LOSS PER SHARE, BASIC AND DILUTED                                                                $           (1.75)
                                                                                                       =================
</TABLE>
## Summary Measures and Graphs

- Individual Provisions
- Level of Monthly Benefits

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						B6.2: Provide the same dollar amount increase to the monthly benefit amount (MBA) of any beneficiary who is 85 or older at the beginning of 2024 or who reaches their 85th birthday after the beginning of 2024. The dollar amount of increase equals 5 percent of the average retired-worker MBA in the prior year.**

|  |  |
|--|--|
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
 
                      FISHER SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL INC.
                           WORLDWIDE SUBSIDIARY LIST
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              PERCENTAGE    STATE/COUNTRY
                                                              OWNERSHIP     INCORPORATION
                                                              ----------    --------------
<S>                                                           <C>           <C>
Fisher Scientific Company L.L.C.............................      100             Delaware
     Fisher Scientific Limited..............................      100               Canada
Fisher Hamilton Inc.........................................      100             Delaware
Systems Manufacturing Corporation...........................      100             Delaware
Applied Scientific Corporation..............................      100           California
Fisher Scientific GmbH......................................      100              Germany
     Kuhn + Bayer GmbH......................................      100              Germany
Fisher Scientific of the Netherlands B.V....................      100          Netherlands
     Fisher Scientific B.V..................................      100          Netherlands
Fisher Scientific Worldwide Inc.............................      100             Delaware
     Acros Organics N.V.....................................      100              Belgium
       Resco Trade N.V......................................      100              Belgium
     Fisher Chimica N.V.....................................      100              Belgium
     Fisher Scientific Holding Company......................      100             Delaware
       Fisher Scientific Holding U.K., Limited..............      100       United Kingdom
       Fisher Scientific U.K., Limited......................      100       United Kingdom
Orme Scientific Limited.....................................      100       United Kingdom
Fisher Scientific Holdings France S.A.......................      100               France
     Bioblock Scientific S.A................................      100               France
     Fisher Scientific S.A..................................      100               France
Fisher Technology Group Inc.................................      100             Delaware
ProcureNet, Inc.............................................      100             Delaware
     SourceSys, Inc.........................................    73.15             Delaware
     Structured Computer Systems, Inc.......................      100          Connecticut
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21.1

                        LIST OF REGISTRANT'S SUBSIDIARIES



                                            STATE OR OTHER   
                                            JURISDICTION OF  
NAME                                       INCORPORATION     
----------------------------------------   ----------------- 

Banyan Trails, Inc.                             Florida      


Engle Homes/Arizona, Inc.                       Florida      


Engle Homes/Atlanta, Inc.                       Florida      


Engle Homes/Broward, Inc.                       Florida      


Engle Homes/Colorado, Inc.                      Florida      


Engle Homes/Gulf Coast, Inc.                    Florida      


Engle Homes/Lake Bernadette, Inc.               Florida      


Engle Homes/North Carolina, Inc.                Florida      


Engle Homes/Orlando, Inc.                       Florida      


Engle Homes/Palm Beach, Inc.                    Florida      


Engle Homes/Pembroke, Inc.                      Florida      


Engle Homes/Southwest Florida, Inc.             Florida      


Engle Homes/Texas, Inc.                         Florida      


Engle Homes/Virginia, Inc.                      Florida      


Greenleaf Homes, Inc.                           Florida      


Pembroke Falls Realty, Inc.                     Florida      


Preferred Builders Realty, Inc.                 Florida      


Preferred Home Mortgage Company                 Florida      


St. Tropez At Boca Golf, Inc.                   Florida      


Universal Land Title, Inc.                      Florida      


Engle Homes/Arizona Construction, Inc.          Arizona      


Universal Land Title of Colorado, Inc.         Colorado
Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual 

Balance in 

75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

Annual Balance 

in 75th Year

Long-Range 

Actuarial 

Balance

B

7

-1.70% -4.20% 1.01% 1.36% -0.69% 

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2008 Trustees Report Office of the Chief A

July 16, 2008

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Level of OASDI Contribution and Benefit Base

Proposed Provision: Make 90 percent of the earnings subject to the payroll tax (phased in 2retain the current-law taxable maximum for benefit purposes. This estimate considers all searnings in computing the percentage of earnings subject to the payroll tax.

Present Law Change From Present Law in Results with this 

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

0.02.04.06.08.0

10.012.014.016.018.020.0

2008 2018 2028 2038 2048 2058 2068 2078

Year

Percent

Cost rates with this provisionCost rates under present lawIncome rates with this provisionIncome rates under present law

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

 (assets as a percentage of annual expe

0

100200300400500600700800900

1000

2008 2018 2028 2038 2048 2058 

Year

Percent

Present law With this p
## Detailed Single Year Tables

- Individual Provisions
- Retirement Age

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						C2.7: Increase the normal retirement age (NRA) and the earliest eligibility age (EEA) for those age 62 starting in 2024 by 3 months per year until EEA reaches 64 in 2031 and NRA reaches 69 in 2031.**

### Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program

### Summarized Estimates
Exhibit 31.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Donna Dellomo, certify that:



|(1) | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Perfumania Holdings, Inc.;
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: June 1, 2010



|                       
|-----------------------
|By: /S/ DONNA DELLOMO  
|Donna Dellomo          
|Chief Financial Officer
News      - Press Releases
      - Newsletters
      - Videos
      - Podcasts
      -  Resources          - Annual Reports
        - Public Information Pamphlets
        - Fact Sheets
        - Storymaps
        - SRBC in the News 

Home ** About ** News ** New Release Title
#### RUTH E. LUDWICK, Administratrix, v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY et *al.*

(Filed 15 December, 1937.)

Appeal and Error § 40b—

Judgment of the Superior Court reversing the order of the municipal court granting defendant’s motion to strike out allegations of the complaint as being evidentiary, is affirmed on authority of *Poovey v. HicTcory,*210 N. C., 630.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Armstrong, J.,*at June Term, 1937, of Guilford.

Civil action to recover damages for death of plaintiff’s intestate, alleged to have been caused by the wrongful act, neglect, or default of the defendants.

Plaintiff’s cause of action arises out of a collision between an automobile, in which her intestate was riding as a guest, and defendants’ passenger train at a crossing in the city of High Point.

The circumstances under which the collision occurred, according to plaintiff’s allegations, are detailed in paragraph five of the complaint.

The allegations of this paragraph are denied in the answer, and, following the denial, the defendants set out the facts as they understand them.

*665There was a motion to strike out the defendants’ recital of the facts as being “evidentiary, irrelevant, and incompetent.” This motion was allowed in the municipal'court of the city of High Point and reversed on appeal to the Superior Court of Guilford County.

From this latter ruling, plaintiff appeals, assigning error.

*Lovelace & Kirlcman and Charles L. Coggin for plaintiff.*

*W. T. Joyner and Roberson, Haworth & Reese for defendants.*

Per Curiam.

Affirmed on authority of *Poovey v. Hickory,*210 N. C., 630, 188 S. E., 78; *Scott v. Bryan, ibid.,*478, 187 S. E., 756; *Hardy v. Dahl,*209 N. C., 746, 184 S. E., 480; *McDonald v. Zimmerman,*206 N. C., 746, 175 S. E., 92. The Court will not undertake to chart the course of the trial, or to delimit the hearing, upon attenuate questions of pleading. *Pemberton v. Greensboro,*205 N. C., 599, 172 S. E., 196; *S. c.,*203 N. C., 514, 166 S. E., 396.

Affirmed.
### Proposed Provision: E1.2. Increase the payroll tax rate (currently 12.4 percent) to 16.2 percent in 2034-2063, and to 20.0 percent in years 2064 and later.