alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7533-7534]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3068]



=======================================================================
[Docket Nos. RP95-144-000 and CP95-186-000]


Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.; Notice of Petition for Approval of 
Exit Fee Stipulation

February 2, 1995.
    Take notice that on January 30, 1995, Tennessee Gas Pipeline 
Company (Tennessee), filed a petition pursuant to Rule 207 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure for an order approving a 
Stipulation and Agreement (Stipulation) entered into between Tennessee 
and Ozark Gas Transmission System (Ozark) on December 9, 1994. The 
Stipulation establishes conditions under which Tennessee will pay to 
Ozark an exit fee in return for Ozark agreeing to early termination and 
abandonment of its upstream transportation service agreement (Contract 
No. T-602) with Tennessee.
    Tennessee requests authorization to: (1) pay a negotiated exit fee 
to Ozark for the early termination of Ozark/Tennessee firm 
transportation Contract No. T-602; (2) recover 100 percent of this exit 
fee through Tennessee's ``Transportation Cost Rate Adjustment'' 
mechanism as a stranded Account No. 858 cost; (3) abandon its 
obligations under Contract No. T-602; and (4) abandon by sale to Ozark 
for the lower of $1.7 million or actual book value a five-mile, 12-inch 
lateral that interconnects Ozark with Texas Eastern Transmission 
Corporation (Texas Eastern) in White County, Arkansas.
    Tennessee notes that the effectiveness of the Stipulation is 
contingent on Commission approval of a similar agreement entered into 
between Ozark and Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, also entered 
into on December 9, 1994; and subject to Commission review in Docket 
No. RP95-98-000.
    Comments on the settlement, as well as motions to intervene or 
protests should be filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 
825 North Capitol Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, on or before 
February 23, 1995. Reply comments should be filed on or before March 6, 
1995. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this petition are on file with 
the [[Page 7534]] Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-3068 Filed 2-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3321 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

317 Blattner Drive in Avon, Minnesota, as the ‘‘W.O.C. Kort Miller 

Plantenberg Post Office’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 7, 2021 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Ms. SMITH) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 317 Blattner Drive in Avon, Minnesota, as 

the ‘‘W.O.C. Kort Miller Plantenberg Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. W.O.C. KORT MILLER PLANTENBERG POST OF4 FICE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 317 Blattner Drive in Avon, Min7 nesota, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘W.O.C. 

8 Kort Miller Plantenberg Post Office’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3321 IS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘W.O.C. Kort Miller 

5 Plantenberg Post Office’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00320-CV

JORGE CHAVARRIA, BRANDY 

CHAVARRIA, AND WILMA

SOLORAZANO

APPELLANTS

V.

PRESTONWOOD DRIVE 2737 

LAND TRUST

APPELLEE

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF DENTON COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. CV-2015-01562

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

On October 13, 2015, and November 2, 2015, we notified appellants in 

accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c) that we would dismiss this 

appeal unless the $205 filing fee was paid. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). 

Appellants have not paid the $205 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

 1

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

Because appellants failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of 

appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court’s order of August 28, 2015,

2

we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

Appellants shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ. 

DELIVERED: November 25, 2015

 2

See Supreme Court of Tex., Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil 

Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-district 

Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Aug. 28, 2015) (listing courts of appeals’

fees).
EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in  Registration  Statement  No.
333-35580 of E Com Ventures,  Inc. on Form S-3 and  Registration  Statements No.
333-30882 and 333-70608 on Forms S-8 of our report dated April 30, 2004,  except
for the  fourth  paragraph  of Note 6, as to  which  the  date is May 12,  2004,
appearing  in this Annual  Report on Form 10-K of E Com  Ventures,  Inc. for the
year ended January 31, 2004.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Miami, Florida
May 17, 2004
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 -0.13 -0.17 -4% -4%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

September 15, 2023

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Level of Monthly Benefits

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: B6.2. Provide the same dollar amount increase to the monthly benefit amount (MBA) 

of any beneficiary who is 85 or older at the beginning of 2024 or who reaches their 85th birthday after the 

beginning of 2024. The dollar amount of increase equals 5 percent of the average retired-worker MBA in 

the prior year.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision
VI 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3475 

For the relief of Cesar Carlos Silva Rodriguez. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 11 (legislative day, JANUARY 10), 2022 

Ms. CORTEZ MASTO introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Cesar Carlos Silva Rodriguez. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR CESAR 

4 CARLOS SILVA RODRIGUEZ. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), Cesar Carlos Silva Rodriguez shall 

8 be eligible for the issuance of an immigrant visa or for 

9 adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted 

10 for permanent residence upon filing an application for 

11 issuance of an immigrant visa under section 204 of that 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3475 IS

1 Act (8 U.S.C. 1154) or for adjustment of status to lawful 

2 permanent resident. 

3 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Cesar Carlos Silva 

4 Rodriguez enters the United States before the filing dead5 line specified in subsection (c), Cesar Carlos Silva Rodri6 guez shall be considered to have entered and remained 

7 lawfully and shall be eligible for adjustment of status 

8 under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act 

9 (8 U.S.C. 1255) as of the date of the enactment of this 

10 Act. 

11 (c) APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF FEES.—Sub12 sections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the application for 

13 issuance of immigrant visas or the application for adjust14 ment of status are filed with appropriate fees within two 

15 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

16 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.— 

17 Upon the granting of immigrant visas or permanent resi18 dence to Cesar Carlos Silva Rodriguez, the Secretary of 

19 State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by one, 

20 during the current or next following fiscal year— 

21 (1) the total number of immigrant visas that 

22 are made available to natives of the country of birth 

23 of Cesar Carlos Silva Rodriguez under section 

24 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 

25 U.S.C. 1153(a)); or 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3475 IS

1 (2) if applicable, the total number of immigrant 

2 visas that are made available to natives of the coun3 try of birth of Cesar Carlos Silva Rodriguez under 

4 section 202(e) of that Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(e)). 

5 (e) PAYGO.—The budgetary effects of this Act, for 

6 the purpose of complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You7 Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by reference to the 

8 latest statement titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 

9 Legislation’’ for this Act, submitted for printing in the 

10 Congressional Record by the Chairman of the Senate 

11 Budget Committee, provided that such statement has been 

12 submitted prior to the vote on passage. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.24

[Letterhead]

BIOTRANSPLANT
------------- [LOGO]
INCORPORATED



December 1, 1998
                                                        Building 75, 3rd Avenue
                                                          Charlestown Navy Yard
                                                          Charlestown, MA 02129
                                                              Tel: 617/241-5200
                                                               FAX 617/241-8780
David H. Sachs, M.D.
Director, Transplantation Biology
Research Center
Department of Surgery
Massachusetts General Hospital
Charlestown, MA 02129

Dear David:

As January 1, 1999 completes eight years of your consulting arrangements with
us, BioTransplant is pleased to renew your contract for the coming year
(1/1/99-1/1/2000). Per our agreement, the consumer price index increased by
1.5% and the consulting rate is $92,704.00 for the coming year.

Please sign both copies of this letter, return one copy to me and keep the
other for your records.

David, based on all the hard work that we've done to date, 1999 should
finally achieve our proof of principle!

Best Wishes,


/S/ Elliot Lebowitz
--------------------------
Elliot Lebowitz, Ph.D.
President and CEO



Accepted by:


/S/ David H. Sachs
--------------------------
David H. Sachs, M.D.


12/15/98
--------------------------
Date



<PAGE>

[Letterhead]

BIOTRANSPLANT
------------- [LOGO]
INCORPORATED



January 5, 2000
                                                        Building 75, 3rd Avenue
                                                          Charlestown Navy Yard
                                                          Charlestown, MA 02129
                                                              Tel: 617/241-5200
                                                               FAX 617/241-8780
David H. Sachs, M.D.
Professor of Surgery (Immunology), Harvard Medical School
Director, Transplantation Biology Research Center
Massachusetts General Hospital
MGH-East, Building 149-9019, 13th Street
Boston, MA 02129

Dear David:

As January 1, 2000 completes nine years of your consulting arrangements with
us, BioTransplant is pleased to renew your contract for the coming year
(1/1/2000-1/1/2001). Per our agreement, the consumer price index increased by
2.7% and the consulting rate is $95,207.00 for the coming year.

Please sign both copies of this letter, return one copy to me and keep the
other for your records.

David, based on all the hard work that we've done to date, 2000 should
finally achieve our proof of principle!

Best Wishes,


/S/ Elliot Lebowitz
--------------------------
Elliot Lebowitz, Ph.D.
President and CEO



Accepted by:

/S/ David H. Sachs
------------------------------
Name


1/11/2000
---------------------------
Date
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lionbridge Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Rory J. Cowan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Stephen J. Lifshatz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: May 9, 2005



|                       
|-----------------------
|/S/ RORY J. COWAN      
|Rory J. Cowan          
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|/S/ STEPHEN J. LIFSHATZ
|Stephen J. Lifshatz    
|Chief Financial Officer



1
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  Pursuant to  18 U.S.C. Sections 1350  as Adopted Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act
of 2002

I, Christopher R. Gardner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation.

December,
1, 2010

By:

/s/ CHRISTOPHER R. GARDNER Christopher R. Gardner Chief Executive Officer


I,
Richard C. Yonker, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Vitesse
Semiconductor Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Vitesse
Semiconductor Corporation.

December 1,
2010

By:

/s/ RICHARD C. YONKER Richard C. Yonker Chief Financial Officer


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation and will be retained by Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

March 24, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135608 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

ROBERT BOLOGNA an Robert P. Young, Jr. d LINDA BOLOGNA, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiffs-Appellees, Justices 

v SC: 135608 

 COA: 267244 

Wayne CC: 04-434504-CZ

DENISE PEVARNEK,

Defendant-Appellant, 

and 

CHESTER DAMIANI and RED CARPET 

KEIM REALTY,

 Defendants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 29, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0317 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 24, 2008 

 Clerk
Order filed April 13, 2021 Withdrawn; Order Filed April 20, 2021. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-21-00141-CV

____________

WLSC INCOPRO, LLC, Appellant

V.

ADMIRAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 152nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2017-24459

ORDER

On April 13, 2021, this court issued an order directing appellant to pay the 

filing fee. Appellant paid the filing fee on March 31, 2021. The previous order was 

issued in error.

The April 13, 2021 order issued in this matter is withdrawn. 

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Hassan.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 26, 2020. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, March 26, 2020 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A20D0331. JIMMY BROCK v. CRYSTAL BROCK. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2018SUCV846
Exhibit 23.2

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors
NuWay Medical, Inc.

I consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
NuWay Medical, Inc. and subsidiary on Form S-8 (registration statement No.
333-113443), as filed on March 15, 2004, of our report dated October 26, 2004
relating to the consolidated balance sheet of NuWay Medical, Inc. as of December
31, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, which report appears in the
December 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-KSB of NuWay Medical, Inc.

My report dated October 26, 2004 contains an explanatory paragraph that states
NuWay Medical, Inc. has discontinued its remaining operations.

My report dated October 26, 2004 contains an explanatory paragraph that states
NuWay Medical, Inc. has limited liquid resources, recurring losses from
operations, and is seeking to implement its business plan, which requires the
Company to acquire or develop a business which raise substantial doubt about its
ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do
not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that
uncertainty.

                                                /s/ Jeffrey S. Gilbert

                                                Jeffrey S. Gilbert, CPA



Los Angeles, California
November 15, 2004
EX-35.3
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


Financial Asset Securities Corporation
600 Steamboat Road
Greenwich, CT 06830


RE: Annual Statement as to Compliance

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows for the calendar year
2007 or applicable portion thereof (the "Reporting Period"):

(a) a review of Wells Fargo's activities as Master Servicer and/or Trust
Administrator under the servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto (the
"Servicing Agreement(s)") has been made under my supervision; and

(b) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review Wells Fargo has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material respects
throughout the Reporting Period.


February 25, 2008
/s/ Jacquelyn E. Kimball
Jacquelyn E. Kimball
Vice President


(page)


(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


Schedule A

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series


1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for Soundview Home Loan Trust 2007-1, Wells
  Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master Servicer and Trust Administrator, as applicable

2 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for SOUNDVIEW 2006-3, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
  as Master Servicer and Trust Administrator, as applicable

3 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for SOUNDVIEW 2006-2; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
  as Master Servicer and Trust Administrator, as applicable

4 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for Soundview 2006-EQ2, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
  as Master Servicer and Trust Administrator, as applicable
#### CITY OF WILMINGTON v. R. A. PARSLEY.

(Filed 26 March, 1930.)

Appeal by respondent from *Grady, J.,*at December Term, 1929, of New HaNOvbb.

Proceeding for condemnation of land, tried upon the following issue:

“1. What damages, if anything, is the defendant entitled to recover of the plaintiff for the rights, privileges and easements taken by it, and injuries to his remaining lands by the construction of new Third Street, as shown on the blue print ? Answer: “$2,500.”

The respondent, feeling aggrieved at the smallness of the damages awarded, appeals from the judgment entered on the verdict, assigning-errors.

*John J. Burney for petitioner.*

*Bryan & Campbell for respondent.*

Pee Cueiam.

A careful perusal of the record leaves us with the impression that the case has been tried in substantial conformity to the decisions on the subject, and that no serious harm has come to the respondent in the particulars pointed out by his exceptions. *Wade v. Highway Commissioners,*188 N. C., 210, 124 S. E., 193; *Elks v. Commissioners,*179 N. C., 241, 102 S. E., 414.

The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.