alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Proposed Provision: C1.6. Starting with those age 62 in 2024, increase the normal retirement age (NRA) 1 month every 2 years until the NRA reaches 69. Also increase the age up to which the delayed retirement credit may be earned at the same rate (from 70 to 72). No change to earliest eligibility age.

back
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 21

                          SUBSIDIARIES OF COMPUSA INC.


1.       CompUSA Stores L.P., a Texas limited partnership.

2.       CompTeam Inc., a Delaware corporation.

3.       CompUSA Management Company, a Delaware business trust.

4.       CompUSA Holdings I Inc., a Delaware corporation.

5.       CompUSA Holdings II Inc., a Delaware corporation.

6.       CompUSA Holdings Company, a Delaware business trust.

7.       CompUSA Net.com Inc., a Delaware corporation.

8.       CompUSA PC Inc., a Delaware corporation.

9.       CompUSA GP Holdings Company, a Delaware business trust.

10.      CompUSA PC Operating Company, a Delaware business trust.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3363 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

135 West Wisconsin Street in Russell, Kansas, as the ‘‘Robert J. Dole 

Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 9, 2021 

Mr. MORAN (for himself and Mr. MARSHALL) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 135 West Wisconsin Street in Russell, Kansas, 

as the ‘‘Robert J. Dole Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ROBERT J. DOLE MEMORIAL POST OFFICE 

4 BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 135 West Wisconsin Street in 

7 Russell, Kansas, shall be known and designated as the 

8 ‘‘Robert J. Dole Memorial Post Office Building’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3363 IS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Robert J. Dole Memo5 rial Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 18-10340

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 4:17-cr-00101-WTM-GRS-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANTHONY ATKINS,

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Georgia

________________________

(October 31, 2018)

Before MARCUS, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

John D. Carson, Jr., appointed counsel for Anthony Atkins in this direct 

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the 

Case: 18-10340 Date Filed: 10/31/2018 Page: 1 of 2 
2

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of 

the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the 

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is 

GRANTED, and Atkins’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. Atkins’s 

motion for new counsel is DENIED.

Case: 18-10340 Date Filed: 10/31/2018 Page: 2 of 2
## Summary Measures and Graphs

- Individual Provisions
- Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable)

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						E2.12: Eliminate the taxable maximum in years 2035 and later. Phase in elimination by taxing all earnings above the current-law taxable maximum at: 1.24 percent in 2026, 2.48 percent in 2027, and so on, up to 12.40 percent in 2035. Provide benefit credit for earnings above the current-law taxable maximum. Create a new bend point at the current-law taxable maximum with a 3 percent formula factor applying above the new bend point.**

|  |  |
|--|--|
#### David Zenner, Respondent, v. Adolph Dessar and others, Appellants.

Order reversed and order of arrest discharged, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Davis, P. J.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 21, 2011 

h0914 

Order 

 

September 21, 2011 

142754 & (70) (74)

BONNIE YACKISH, 

 Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, 

v SC: 142754 

 COA: 289671 

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE Ingham CC: 06-000941-NF 

INSURANCE COMPANY, 

 Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for leave to file a brief amicus curiae is 

GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the February 1, 2011 judgment of the 

Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant are 

considered, and they are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions 

presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

 CAVANAGH, MARILYN KELLY, and HATHAWAY, JJ., would grant plaintiff’s 

application for leave to appeal.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# COMMANDANT

# 

#### **Sgt. Maj. Thinh T. Huynh**

**USSPACECOM Headquarters Commandant**

The Commandant serves primarily as the senior enlisted leader for the headquarters. The Commandant advises the chief of staff, joint directors and command senior enlisted leaders on issues to include, but not limited to, force development, morale, training and education opportunities for service members. The Commandant may also represent the CSEL during periods of absence.

#### **QUICK LINKS**

#### Accessibility  |  Section 508    Web PolicySite Map  |  Defense.gov  |  Intel.govQuestions  |  Privacy and SecurityContact Us  |  Inspector General  |  FOIAOPM.gov  |  Plain Writing Act | MISONo Fear Act  |  Links DisclaimerUSA.gov  |  DoD Open Government

                  - Facebook
                  - X
                  - YouTube
                  - LinkedIn
                  - Civilian Careers

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                            ALLEGIANCE TELECOM, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (LOSS)
                     THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000
                (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                         Percent
                                                                   Number of Shares    Outstanding   Equivalent Shares
                                                                   ----------------    -----------   -----------------
<S>                                                                <C>                 <C>           <C>
Prior to Initial Public Offering
     1997 Common Stock Offering                                                 639         100.00%                639

After Initial Public Offering
     1998 Common Stock Offering                                          15,000,000         100.00%         15,000,000
     Preferred Stock Converted to Common Stock                           60,511,692         100.00%         60,511,692
     1999 Common Stock Offering                                          21,041,100         100.00%         21,041,100
     2000 Common Stock Offering                                          10,703,109         100.00%         10,703,109
     Treasury Shares                                                       (327,495)        100.00%           (327,495)
     Warrants Exercised                                                     741,138          89.73%            665,047
     Stock Options Exercised                                                825,659          90.51%            747,319
     Cash in Lieu of Stock Split                                               (577)        100.00%               (577)
     Employee Stock Discount Purchase Plan Shares Issued                    217,830          98.60%            214,788
     Common Stock Issued for Business Acquisitions                          393,482         100.00%            393,482
                                                                                                     -----------------
     WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING                                                                   108,949,104

     NET LOSS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK                                                             $     (73,332,000)

     NET LOSS PER SHARE, BASIC AND DILUTED                                                           $           (0.67)
                                                                                                     =================
</TABLE>
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3303 

To extend the authority of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 

to enter into leases of non-excess property of the Administration. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 2, 2021 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. SCOTT of 

Florida, and Mr. PADILLA) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To extend the authority of the National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration to enter into leases of non-excess 

property of the Administration. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘NASA Enhanced Use 

5 Leasing Extension Act of 2021’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3303 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO LEASES 

2 OF NON-EXCESS PROPERTY OF THE NA3 TIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINIS4 TRATION. 

5 Section 20145(g) of title 51, United States Code, is 

6 amended, in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘December 31, 

7 2021’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2023’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 21, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51087 Conference Calendar

LARRY KEELE Plaintiff-Appellant

v. FRANK GUAJARDO, III Defendant-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:01-CV-176
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Larry Keele, Texas prisoner # 1077576, appeals pro se from the dismissal of his civil rights complaint following a judgment in a bench trial in favor ofthe defendant. Keele argues that his appointed trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to subpoena witnesses for trial. The constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel does not apply in a civil context. See F.T.C. v. Assail, Inc., 410 F.3d 256, 267 (5th Cir. 2005).No. 06-51087

2 Keele’s requests for a new trial and for the appointment of appellate counsel are denied. This appeal is without arguable merit and is dismissed as frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5TH C IR
. R. 42.2. In Keele v. Chance, No. 4:03-CV-4191 (S.D. Tex. Nov. 25, 2003), the district court imposed the 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) bar against Keele. He is therefore barred from bringing in forma pauperis civil actions or appeals unless he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. § 1915(g); s ee Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 385-88 (5th Cir. 1996)

. We caution Keele that further frivolous filings may result in additional sanctions. APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
Exhibit 10.1
 
 2010
 Page 1




---



##### 



OBJECTIVES
  ELIGIBILITY
   PLAN ADMINISTRATION
       Page 2




---



##### 



PLAN DEFINITIONS
 Revenue
 EBITDA Profit
 Target Incentive
 MBOs
 Executive
    
    DateVP of Human Resources
    
    DateCFO
    
    DateCEO
    
    Date
 Page 3




---



##### 



Attachment A
 EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE PLAN STATEMENT OF GOALS FOR YEAR 2010
 Name
 Percent of Base Salary Payment at Plan:
  CEO Discretionary Multiplier:
 Plan Components:
 A.
    
    70% of your target bonus will be based on Corporate performance as follows.
 
    
    Achieve GAAP Revenue of $XXM. Achieve EBITDA Profit of $XXM. The EBITDA
Profit amount for the purpose of this calculation comprises the GAAP EBITDA Profit
prior to stock compensation expense, discontinued operations, restatement charges, and
restructuring charges. Payment amounts will be pro-rated between matrix levels. No
payments shall occur from performance below any minimum matrix target: (Min. Revenue:
$XXM or Min EBITDA Profit: $XXM)
 Revenue / EBITDA Profit Targets
    
    $XXM
    
    $XXM
    
    $XXM
    
    $XXM
    
    $XXM$XXM
    
    
    125.0
    %
    
    
    137.5
    %
    
    
    150.0
    %
    
    
    175.0
    %
    
    
    200.0
    %$XXM
    
    
    100.0
    %
    
    
    112.5
    %
    
    
    125.0
    %
    
    
    150.0
    %
    
    
    175.0
    %$XXM
    
    
    75.0
    %
    
    
    87.5
    %
    
    
    100.0
    %
    
    
    125.0
    %
    
    
    150.0
    %$XXM
    
    
    62.5
    %
    
    
    75.0
    %
    
    
    87.5
    %
    
    
    112.5
    %
    
    
    137.5
    %$XXM
    
    
    50.0
    %
    
    
    62.5
    %
    
    
    75.0
    %
    
    
    100.0
    %
    
    
    125.0
    %
 B.
    
    30% of your target bonus will be based on individual MBOs as follows.
 
    
    For payment to be made under the MBO component of the Plan, certain financial
targets must be met:
 1.
    
    Participants will be eligible for 100% MBO payout when the
company is >/= 80% of revenue target and EBITDA profitable;2.
    
    Participants will be eligible for 50% MBO payout when the company
is < 80% of revenue target and EBITDA profitable;3.
    
    No payments will be earned under this component if the company is
not EBITDA profitable.
 
    
    Goals and Objectives will be agreed upon between the Plan Participant and the CEO.
    
    Achievement of such goals and objectives shall be made by the Companys Compensation
Committee with input from the CEO.
 Page 4
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [LLNV912000 L13400000.PQ0000 LXSS006F0000; MO#4500090018]

In the notice document published Monday, February 1, 2016 (81 FR 5132), a public meeting of the Bureau of Land Management Nevada Resource Advisory Councils was announced.

The BLM Nevada Resource Advisory Council meeting scheduled for February 10-11, 2016 has been postponed until the outstanding member appointments have been finalized. A new notice will be published when the dates have been decided.

Rudy Evenson,

Deputy Chief, Office of Communications.

[FR Doc. 2016-02095 Filed 2-3-16; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4310-HC-P
### Proposed Provision: D3. Allow divorced aged spouses and divorced surviving spouses married 5 to 9 years to get benefits based on the former spouse's account. Divorced aged and surviving spouses would receive 50% of the applicable current-law PIA percentage if married 5 years, 60% of the applicable PIA percentage if married 6 years, ..., 90% of the applicable PIA percentage if married 9 years. This benefit would be available to divorced spouses on the rolls at the beginning of 2025 and those becoming eligible after 2024.

back
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Office of the Chief Actuary | Single-Year Tables Consistent with 2009 OASDI Trustees Report |
|-----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified Tuesday Aug 31, 2010 | Need Larger Text? |
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Exhibit K

PROPOSED ORDER

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4749-11 Filed: 11/14/19 Entered: 11/14/19 17:30:16 Page 1

of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION,

- and -

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC

COMPANY,

Debtors.

 Affects PG&E Corporation

 Affects Pacific Gas & Electric Company

X Affects both Debtors

* All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case, 

No. 19-30088 (DM).

Case No. 19-30088 (DM)

Chapter 11

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

ORDER ALLOWING THE SECOND

INTERIM APPLICATION OF JENNER 

& BLOCK LLP, AS SPECIAL 

CORPORATE DEFENSE COUNSEL TO 

THE DEBTORS, FOR COMPENSATION 

FOR SERVICES RENDERED AND 

REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES 

INCURRED FOR THE PERIOD FROM 

JUNE 1, 2019 THROUGH

SEPTEMBER 30, 2019

Upon consideration of the second interim application (the “Application”) of Jenner & 

Block LLP (“Applicant”), as special corporate defense counsel for the above-captioned debtors 

(the “Debtors”), for compensation for legal services rendered in this case and for reimbursement 

for disbursements for the period from June 1, 2019 through September 30, 2019 (the “Application 

Period”), the certification of Applicant and the exhibits annexed to the Application; and it 

appearing that the compensation requested in the Application is reasonable; and the Court having 

jurisdiction to consider and determine the Application in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 

1334; and due notice of the Application having been provided pursuant to Federal Rule of 

Bankruptcy Procedure 2002(a)(6) and (c)(2), and it appearing that no further notice need be given; 

and a hearing having been held before this Court, and after due deliberation and sufficient cause 

appearing therefore, 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4749-11 Filed: 11/14/19 Entered: 11/14/19 17:30:16 Page 2

of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The Application is approved on an interim basis as reflected herein. 

2. The Applicant is awarded interim allowance of compensation for professional 

services rendered during the Application Period in the amount of $2,987,382.00 in fees and 

$28,578.36 in actual and necessary expenses. 

3. The Debtors are authorized and directed to make prompt paymet to the Applicant 

of all allowed fees and expenses to the extent not already paid by the Debtors.

4. The Court retains jurisdiction over any issues or disputes arising out of or relating 

to this Order. 

***END OF ORDER***

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4749-11 Filed: 11/14/19 Entered: 11/14/19 17:30:16 Page 3

of 3