alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 13.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT**

**TO SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Intertape Polymer Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gregory A.C. Yull, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: March 31, 2016
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, AS AMENDED
  1.
    
    the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended June 30,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the Exchange Act); and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Pervez A. QureshiName:
    Pervez A. QureshiTitle:
    President and Chief Executive Officer The foregoing certification which accompanies the Report is not to be deemed filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6111

JAMES THOMAS HAYWOOD,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

FRANK C. SIZER, JR., Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL

FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA98-1838)

Submitted: June 17, 1999 Decided: June 24, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Thomas Haywood, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,

Attorney General, Regina Hollins Lewis, Assistant Attorney General,

Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s judgment is marked as “filed”

on January 20, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was

entered on the docket sheet on January 21, 1999. Pursuant to Rules

58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, we take the

date that the judgment was entered on the docket sheet as the

effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v.

Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

James Thomas Haywood seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court. See Haywood v. Sizer, No. CA98-1838 (D. Md. Jan. 21, 1999).* We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
## Summary Measures and Graphs

- Individual Provisions
- Level of Monthly Benefits

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						B3.15: Increase the 90 percent PIA formula factor to 91 percent for beneficiaries newly eligible in 2028, 92 percent for those newly eligible in 2029, ..., reaching 95 percent for those newly eligible in 2032 and later.**

|  |  |
|--|--|
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 7551

GREGORY K. CLINTON , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. ELIZABETH D. GRANT, In her individual capacity; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Martinsburg

. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. ( 3:20

- cv
- 00178

- GMG

- RWT )

Submitted : December 22, 2020 Decided: December 29, 2020

Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Gregory K. Clinton , Appellant Pro Se

.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Gregory K

. Clinton filed the underlying civil ac tion pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971 ). Clinton seeks to appeal the district court’s order overruling his objections to the magistrate judge’s order denying Clinton’s motion to appoint counsel. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541,
545

- 46 (1949). The order Clinto n seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Miller v. Simmons , 814 F.2d 962, 967 (4th Cir. 1987). Accordingly , we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Clinton’s motion s to
amend and for recusal and deny as moot his motion to expedite and for release pending resolution of this appeal . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contenti ons are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
### Proposed Provision: D1. Beginning in 2024, continue benefits for children of disabled or deceased workers until age 22 if the child is in high school, college or vocational school.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3358 

To authorize the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for the lying in state 

of the remains of the last Medal of Honor recipient of World War 

II, in order to honor the Greatest Generation and the more than 

16,000,000 men and women who served in the Armed Forces of the 

United States from 1941 to 1945. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 9, 2021 

Mr. MANCHIN (for himself, Mrs. CAPITO, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, Mr. ROMNEY, 

Mr. COTTON, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. TESTER, Mr. CRUZ, and Ms. 

DUCKWORTH) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

A BILL 

To authorize the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for the 

lying in state of the remains of the last Medal of Honor 

recipient of World War II, in order to honor the Greatest 

Generation and the more than 16,000,000 men and 

women who served in the Armed Forces of the United 

States from 1941 to 1945. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3358 IS

1 SECTION 1. HONORING HERSHEL WOODROW ‘‘WOODY’’ WIL2 LIAMS AS THE LAST SURVIVING MEDAL OF 

3 HONOR RECIPIENT OF WORLD WAR II. 

4 (a) USE OF ROTUNDA.—Upon his death, Hershel 

5 Woodrow ‘‘Woody’’ Williams, who is the last surviving re6 cipient of the Medal of Honor for acts performed during 

7 World War II, shall be permitted to lie in state in the 

8 rotunda of the United States Capitol if he or his next of 

9 kin so elects. 

10 (b) IMPLEMENTATION.—The Architect of the Capitol, 

11 under the direction of the President pro tempore of the 

12 Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, 

13 shall take the necessary steps to implement subsection (a). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7620]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3130]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Notice of Merger of Approved Trustee

    Notice is hereby given that New First City Texas-Beaumont, National 
Association, Beaumont, Texas, merged with and into Texas Commerce Bank, 
National Association-Beaumont, P. O. Box 2751, Beaumont, Texas 77704, 
effective February 13, 1993, with Texas Commerce Bank, National 
Association-Beaumont as the surviving corporation in the merger.

    Dated: February 2, 1995.

    By Order of the Maritime Administrator.
Murray A. Bloom,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-3130 Filed 2-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-81-P
### Proposed Provision: A9. For single/head-of-household/married-filing-separate taxpayers with modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) below $108,700 and for joint filers with MAGI below $217,400 for December 2025 ($85,000 and $170,000 multiplied by estimated CPI-U for 2018-2025), use the chain-weighted version of the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (C-CPI-U) to calculate the cost-of-living adjustment (COLA), beginning with the December 2025 COLA. For those beneficiaries whose MAGI is above these thresholds, provide no COLA. Use prior tax year income data for this determination. Use the chain-weighted CPI for the COLA for years prior to benefit receipt. Index the eligibility income threshold amounts to the CPI-U after December 2025.

back
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A0581. SEDLECEK v. THE STATE.

The Motion to Withdraw as counsel of record filed on December 4, 2015, by

attorney Gregory A. Hicks is hereby DENIED. 

Although attachments to the pleading indicate that the appellant requested pro

se that the trial court remove Hicks as attorney of record, no other attorney has filed

a notice of appearance, and the record does not show that the trial court has

determined that the appellant has knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to

counsel and wishes to proceed pro se on appeal. Accordingly, this case is hereby

REMANDED to the jurisdiction of the trial court for determination of whether the

appellant desires and is entitled to appointed appellate counsel, has retained counsel,

or has knowingly waived his right to counsel. Calmes v. State, 312 Ga. App. 769, 773

(3) (719 SE2d 516) (2011) (“A defendant may waive hisright to counsel during postconviction proceedings, but the record should reflect a finding on the part of the trial

court that the defendant has validly chosen to proceed pro se. The record should also

show that this choice was made after the defendant was made aware of his right to

counsel and the dangers of proceeding without counsel.”) (citations and punctuation

omitted.); Weber v. State, 203 Ga. App. 356, 357 (416 SE2d 868) (1992) (When an

indigent criminal defendant electsto waive the right to counsel and represent himself

during post-conviction proceedings, the record should reflect the defendant’s

appreciation of the charges for which he has been convicted and possible avenues of

post-judgment relief. The defendant should be made aware “that post-judgment

practice involves strict compliance with rules of practice and procedure; that failure

December 16, 2015
to comply with these rules may result in waiver of important issues and that pro se

parties are generally bound by the same rules of practice and procedure as a lawyer.”)

(citation and punctuation omitted).

Upon completion of the record, either by the filing of an order appointing

appellate counsel, the entry of appearance of retained counsel, or a determination on

the record by the trial court that the appellant knowingly wishesto proceed pro se, the

clerk of the trial court may transmit the record to this Court for redocketing pursuant

to the Notice of Appeal filed October 30, 2015.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

12/16/2015
## Social Security Detailed Calculator

- Office of the Chief Actuary 
 Current version
The current version of the Detailed Calculator is **2024.1**, which we released on           **January 4, 2024**.  It updates the 2023.2 version by updating the economic data with the new       automatic adjustments announced in the fall of 2023.
Links to detailed calculator-  **Description**             of the Detailed Calculator            
-  **Download**             the Detailed Calculator            
-  **User's guide**             for the Detailed Calculator            
-  **Updating**             the Detailed Calculator            
-  **Source code**             (in the C++ computer language) used to create the Detailed Calculator            
-  **Batch versions**             of the Detailed Calculator            
mySocial Security
If you have a personal mySocial Security account,       you can get an estimate of your future retirement benefits and see the effects of different retirement        age scenarios. If you don’t have a personal mySocial Security account,        create one at        www.ssa.gov/myaccount.	   If you are estimating a normal retirement benefit, then you may want to try this before using the        Detailed Calculator, because it is easier to use and does not require you to enter your earnings record.
Online calculator
 The Detailed Calculator has many features which are not necessary for normal          retirement benefit estimates.  If you do not require these features, you should          try using the           Online Calculator          first, because it is much easier to use. 
Questions or comments
If you have questions or comments about the Detailed Calculator, please visit our      Contact Social Security       page for ways to contact us.  Remember to use "Detailed Calculator" as the subject      so we know which calculator your question or comment refers to.

Footer menu
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.1

                                                                     EXHIBIT "A"


                        AMENDED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                                ENGLE HOMES, INC.

                                 ARTICLE I. NAME

         The name of the corporation is Engle Homes, Inc.

                               ARTICLE II. ADDRESS

         The mailing address of the corporation is 701 Brickell Avenue, Suite
3000, Miami, Florida 33131.

                              ARTICLE III. PURPOSE

         The corporation is organized to engage in any activity or business
permitted under the laws of the United States and Florida.

                          ARTICLE IV. AUTHORIZED SHARES

         The maximum number of shares that the corporation is authorized to have
outstanding at any time is 1,000 shares of common stock having a par value of
$.01 per share.

                     ARTICLE V. REGISTERED OFFICE AND AGENT

         The street address of the registered office of the corporation is 701
Brickell Avenue, Suite 3000, Miami, Florida 33131 and the name of the
corporation's registered agent at that address is Intrastate Registered Agent
Corporation.


<PAGE>   2
                               ARTICLE VI. BYLAWS

         The power to adopt, alter, amend or repeal bylaws shall be vested in
the board of directors and the shareholders, except that the board of directors
may not amend or repeal any bylaw adopted by the shareholders if the
shareholders specifically provide that the bylaw is not subject to amendment or
repeal by the directors.

                             ARTICLE VII. AMENDMENTS

                  The corporation reserves the right to amend, alter, change, or
repeal any provision in these Articles of INCORPORATION in the manner prescribed
by law, and all rights conferred on shareholders are subject to this
reservation.
---

| |                                                                                |                                                                       
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
| | KPMG LLPBay Adelaide
      Centre 333 Bay Street Suite 4600 Toronto ON M5H 2S5 | Telephone (416) 777-8500 Fax
      (416) 777-8818 Internet www.kpmg.ca

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors Energy Fuels Inc.

We consent to the use of our report dated March 18, 2015, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements included in this annual report
on Form 40-F.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference of such
report in the registration statements No. 333-194916 on Form F-10 and No.
333-194900 on Form S-8 of Energy Fuels Inc.



Chartered Professional Accountants, Licensed Public
AccountantsMarch 19, 2015Toronto, Canada





KPMG LLP is
a Canadian limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMGnetwork of independent member firms
affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative(KPMG International), a Swiss entity.KPMG Canada provides services to
KPMG LLP.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM (A)
RAINTREE RESORTS  INTERNATIONAL,  INC. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
PERIOD  ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH (B) FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001058736
<NAME>                        RAINTREE RESORTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                           5,182
<SECURITIES>                                     1,916
<RECEIVABLES>                                   74,234
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (8,746)
<INVENTORY>                                        763
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               103,126
<PP&E>                                           7,678
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (2,393)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 147,084
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,230
<BONDS>                                         94,093
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            5,387
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                     (26,152)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   147,084
<SALES>                                         35,287
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                46,302
<CGS>                                            8,453
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,732
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,150
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 9,151
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,652
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (11,125)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        37
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (11,162)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (11,162)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.06)



</TABLE>
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 10.z

                          Management Incentive Plan


The Company has adopted a Management Incentive Plan ("MIP") for fiscal 1999
which applies to approximately 20 operating officers and managers who serve
at the subsidiary, group and corporate management level.

Under the terms of the MIP a maximum of 50% of an employee's annual base pay
may be earned in cash incentive, based on the achievement of certain
performance objectives. The plan operates as follows:

1.  A pool of cash incentive for each employee is credited based on the
    performance to target of the unit to which the employee is assigned. The
    incentive pool is created, beginning at 20% of base payable at 90% of
    target unit earnings performance and capping at 25% of the employee's
    annual pay at 100% of target unit earnings performance. Target earnings
    performances have been established for each operating unit of the Company,
    the group level, and for the Company in total.

2.  Additionally, the pool of cash incentive for each employee is credited
    based on the performance to target of the Company, beginning at 20% of
    base payable at 90% of target Company earnings performance and capping at
    25% of the employee's annual pay at 100% of target Company earnings
    performance.

3.  One half of the pool is to be paid, based solely on the achievement of
    the target financial levels.

4.  The second half of the incentive pool is to be paid based on the employee
    achieving certain stipulated non-financial performance objectives.

5.  The Chief Executive Officer will receive no MIP if the target Company
    earnings performance is not attained.

6.  Additional cash incentive may be paid to selected managers based on the
    achievement of outstanding unit financial performance or the attainment
    of certain strategic goals, at the recommendation of the Management
    Development and Compensation Committee of the Company Board of Directors
    and if approved by the Company Board of Directors.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-K for the year ending
December 31, 2009 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jason M. Morton, Chief Financial Officer of III
to I International Maritime Solutions Cayman, Inc., the general partner of III
to I Maritime Partners Cayman I, L.P. (the “Company”) hereby certify, pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      at the dates and for the periods
indicated.






Date: 
March 31, 2010


/s/ JASON
M. MORTON


Jason M.
Morton


Chief
Financial Officer,


III to I
International Maritime Solutions Cayman, Inc.