alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE v. WALTER MOORE.

(Filed 2 December, 1953.)

Bastards § 4: Criminal Law § 58—

Where an indictment under G.S. 49-2 fails to charge that defendant’s failure to support his illegitimate child was willful, the indictment fails to charge an essential element of the offense and defendant’s motion in arrest of judgment must be allowed.

Appeai, by defendant from *Burney, J.,*and a jury, at February Term, 1953, of New HaNovek.

Criminal prosecution upon a warrant wbieb was supposed to charge the defendant with the willful nonsupport of his illegitimate child.

This criminal action originated in the Eecorder’s Court of New Hanover County, and was carried thence to the Superior Court of New Hanover County by the appeal of the defendant.

Trial was had *de novo*in the Superior Court upon the original warrant, which was based on a criminal complaint alleging that the defendant “has failed or refused and neglected to provide adequate support for ... a bastard child” begotten by him upon the body of the prosecuting witness.

The only evidence at the trial was that of the State, which was ample to make out a case against the defendant under G.S. 49-2. The jury returned a verdict of guilty, and the defendant moved in arrest of judgment. The court denied the motion, and the defendant reserved an exception to the ruling. The court sentenced the defendant to imprisonment as a misdemeanant, and suspended the sentence on condition that the defendant pay a specific sum each month for the support of the child mentioned in the criminal complaint. The defendant appealed.

*Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorney-General Love for the State.*

*McClelland ■& Burney for defendant, appellant.*

EnviN, J.

The Attorney-General correctly concedes that the court erred in denying the motion in arrest of judgment.

Under G.S. 49-2, the neglect or the refusal of a parent to support his illegitimate child is not a crime unless it is willful. As a consequence, the State must both allege and prove a willful nonsupport in a prosecution under the statute. *S. v. McDay,*232 N.C. 388, 61 S.E. 2d 86; *S. v. Morgan,*226 N.C. 414, 38 S.E. 2d 166; *S. v. Hayden,*224 N.C. 779, 32 S.E. 2d 333; *S. v. Allen,*224 N.C. 530, 31 S.E. 2d *530.*The criminal complaint underlying the warrant in the instant case does not charge the *744defendant with the essential element of willfulness. This omission renders the warrant fatally defective, and necessitates an arrest of the judgment. S*. v. Morgan, supra; S. v. Vanderlip,*225 N.C. 610, 35 S.E. 2d 885; *S. v. Moore,*220 N.C. 535, 17 S.E. 2d 660; *S. v. Clarke,*220 N.C. 392, 17 S.E. 2d 468; *S. v. McLamb,*214 N.C. 322, 199 S.E. 81; *S. v. Tarlton,*208 N.C. 734, 182 S.E. 481.

Judgment arrested.
## Court of Appeals of the State of Geo rgia

ATLA NTA,

_________________ _ The Court of

Appeals he reby passes

the followi

ng order: A14A0579. OSBORN v. THE ST ATE. This is the second time appellant Osborn has appeare d before o ur Court. T he record in this case

was originally delivered to this Court from the Super

ior Court o f White County in Case Num ber A12A0380, docketed on October 14, 2011. In that case, we reversed the j udgmen t of the trial court and rem anded the c ase with d irection that the trial

court hold a

hearing to consider O sborn’s m otion for out-of-time a

ppeal. The rem ittitur issu ed on May

29, 2012. The trial court subs equently held a hearing , grantedthe motion

for out-of

-tim e appeal, and denied Olson’s motion for new trial. The instant app eal chall enging the denial of the motion for new

trial wa s docketed i

n this Court o n Novem

ber 25, 201 3. Pursuant to Court of Appeals Ru le 42 (b) , we recy cle all records, record appendice s, and tra

nscripts one

year after th e rem

ittitur has issued unles s otherwi se notified. If eithe r party

anticipat es that a c ase will return to this Court, he

or she “m ust notify the Cler k, in wr iting, to ho ldthe recor

d.” Ct. of App. R. 42 (c). We were not notified to hold the re cord in this case and it has since been rec ycled

. In lig ht of t he b rea dt h o f mat eri als in vo lv ed, th e in det ermi nat e amo un t o f ti me itwill take to pre

pare and t ransmit the rec ord to this C ourt, and th e co ns ti tu ti on al t ime restrain ts governing

this Court' s disposition

of appeal s, this ca se mus t be remanded to the Clerk of the Superior Court of Whit e County

until prepa

ration of t he appella

te record is com pleted. W hen the record i s complete, the matter may then be transmitted to and re-do cketed w ith this Court. Upon re-docketing, briefing by the parties should proceed in accorda

nce with C ourt of Appeals Rule 23. July 11, 2014Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Offi

ce, Atlant a,_______________

___ I certify that the above is a tr ue extr act from the minutes of the Court

of Appeals

of Georgia. Witness my signature a nd the seal of sai

d court hereto aff

ixed the day and year last above writt

en. , Clerk. 07/11/2014
Dismiss and Opinion Filed May 3, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-22-00281-CV

COGENT MIDSTREAM WESTEX, LLC; COGENT MIDSTREAM, LLC; 

AND CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S OF LONDON AS 

PARTIAL SUBROGEES OF COGENT, Appellants

V.

ROCKIN' CT OIL & GAS SERVICES, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-14470

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Schenck, Osborne, and Smith

Opinion by Justice Osborne

Before the Court is appellants’ voluntary motion to dismiss the appeal without 

prejudice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). We grant the motion and dismiss the 

appeal without prejudice. See id.

220281f.p05

/Leslie Osborne//

LESLIE OSBORNE

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

COGENT MIDSTREAM WESTEX, 

LLC; COGENT MIDSTREAM, 

LLC; AND CERTAIN 

UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S 

OF LONDON AS PARTIAL 

SUBROGEES OF COGENT, 

Appellants

No. 05-22-00281-CV V.

ROCKIN' CT OIL & GAS 

SERVICES, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial 

District Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-14470.

Opinion delivered by Justice 

Osborne, Justices Schenck and Smith 

participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal 

without prejudice.

We ORDER that appellee Rockin' CT Oil & Gas Services, LLC recover its 

costs, if any, of this appeal from appellants Cogent Midstream WesTex, LLC; 

Cogent Midstream, LLC; and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London as Partial 

Subrogees of Cogent.

Judgment entered this 3

rd day of May 2022.
1The Honorable Bobby E. Shepherd, United States Magistrate Judge for the

Western District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by

consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-2643

___________

David Hill, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

* Appeal from the United States

Officer Hugh, Jailer, Miller County * District Court for the

Jail; Officer Jody, Jailer, Miller County * Western District of Arkansas.

Jail; H. L. Phillips, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: April 7, 1999

 Filed: April 12, 1999

___________

Before FAGG, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

David Hill, an Arkansas prisoner, appeals the district court’s1 order entering

judgment against him in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint following a bench trial.

After careful review of the record and the parties’ briefs, we affirm for the reasons set

forth in the district court’s memorandum opinion. 
-2-

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-11284

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant-Appellee,

versus

RODNEY EUGENE GALGIANI,

Plaintiff-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:96-CR-030-Y

- - - - - - - - - -

June 16, 1997

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Rodney Eugene Galgiani argues that the district court erred

in denying his motion to suppress evidence taken from his person

as a result of a nonconsensual search and an unconstitutional

seizure. 

In reviewing the district court’s ruling on a motion to

suppress, we consider the evidence in the light most favorable to

the prevailing party, accepting factual findings unless clearly
No. 96-11284

- 2 -

erroneous and reviewing questions of law de novo. See United

States v. Shannon, 21 F.3d 77, 81 (5th Cir. 1994). When the

district court enters no factual findings and no indication of

the legal theory underlying its decision to deny a motion to

suppress, we independently review the record to determine whether

any reasonable view of the evidence supports admissibility. See

United States v. Yeagin, 927 F.2d 798, 800 (5th Cir. 1991).

After reviewing the record before us, we conclude the

district court’s determination that Galgiani gave valid consent

to search his bag and his person was not clearly erroneous. See

United States v. Olivier-Becerril, 861 F.2d 424, 426 (5th Cir.

1988); see also United States v. Sutton, 850 F.2d 1083, 1086 (5th

Cir. 1988). Further, although Galgiani’s confrontation with a

DEA task force officer amounted to a seizure once the officer

asked to search his bag, the fruits of such were admissible

because the seizure was based on reasonable suspicion. See

United States v. Simmons, 918 F.2d 476, 481 (5th Cir. 1990); see

also Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 21 (1968).

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to

to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of SAVVIS, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



|(a) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |     |  |                          
|----------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------
|Date: May 7, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ Jeffrey H. Von Deylen
|                  |  |     |  | Jeffrey H. Von Deylen    
|                  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
10.2.2

     

    SUMMARY OF DOUGLAS
ROGERS-BAETA CORP. VERBAL CONTRACT

     

    Rogers
Consulting Group and BAETA Corp. executed a verbal modification on or about July
17, 2008, to the original consulting agreement between Rogers Consulting and
Baeta Corp., dated May 15, 2008.

    


    The
purpose of the modification was to further compensate Rogers Consulting for
additional time spent working with the Company, more than originally anticipated
and contracted for in the original consulting agreement (Ex. 10.2.1). Mr. Rogers
and BAETA Corp. verbally agreed that the efforts of Mr. Rogers warranted further
compensation than provided for in the original agreement (10.2.1), and therefore
agreed to verbally modify Section II(a)(i)(1)(b) of the original agreement
(10.2.1) to issue Rogers, in addition to the cash fee, a sum of 152,000 shares
of common stock in consideration for services performed for the period of May
15, 2008 through September 15, 2008.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-3928

_____________________________

CURTIS EARL SEARLES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

W. Joel Boles, Judge.

August 27, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, OSTERHAUS, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Jasmine Russell, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeanine 

Germanowicz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for 

Appellee.
Hershey Country Club

Home** Grandfathered Registration

# Grandfathered Water Uses Registration Program

In 2016, the Commission completed a study that compiled all available data to characterizeBasin-wide water use and availability.It was concluded there were possibly more than 700older, unpermitted facilities with an estimated water use of nearly one billion gallons perday, roughly equal to the total amount accounted for, and managed by, the Commission acrossthe entireBasinat that time.

In an effort to close this significant knowledge gap regarding unpermitted water use and toensure the Commission’s ability to effectively manage the water resources of the Basin, wedeveloped a Grandfathered Water Uses Program. From January 1st, 2018 throughDecember 31st, 2019, facilities were given the opportunity to register their grandfatheredwithdrawals and consumptive water uses to preserve exemption from obtaining a permit intothe future.

Since then, more than 250 facilities whose water use equals or exceeds theregulatory threshold,providing there has been no environmental harm, have been registered as grandfathered.The Commission is now able to account for more than 795 million gallons per day (mgd)previously unknown, including nearly 18 mgd of consumptively used water and more than 777mgd of water withdrawals. As of early 2024, there are a small amount of registrations yetto be processed.

*Hershey Country Club*

#### Fact Sheet

Registration of Water Uses that Pre-Date Commission Regulations

#### More Information

For more information on the Grandfathered Water Uses Program pleasecontact Rachelle Eby at [email protected]
## Summary Measures and Graphs

- Individual Provisions
- Level of Monthly Benefits

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						B7.8: Replace the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) and Government Pension Offset (GPO) with a revised reduction for most OASI benefits based on all earnings, beginning with beneficiaries newly eligible in 2030.**

|  |  |
|--|--|
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION and PACIFIC GAS 

AND ELECTRIC COMPANY,

Debtors

Chapter 11 

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

(Jointly Administered)

TRANSFER OF CLAIM OTHER THAN FOR SECURITY

A CLAIM HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS CASE or deemed filed under 11 U.S.C. § 1111(a). 

Transferee hereby gives evidence and notice pursuant to Rule 3001(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of 

Bankruptcy Procedure of the transfer, other than for security, of the claim referenced in this 

evidence and notice.

Nesco Rentals ____________ Cherokee Debt Acquisition, LLC

Name of Transferor Name of Transferee

Name and Current Address of

Transferor:

Nesco Rentals

6714 Pointe Inverness Way, Suite 220 

Fort Wayne, IN 46804 

Attn: Brian Reed

Name and Address where notices and payments 

to transferee should be sent: 

Cherokee Debt Acquisition, LLC

1325 Avenue of the Americas, 28th Floor 

New York, NY 10019 

Attn: Vladimir Jelisavcic

Schedule/Claim No. Creditor Name Amount Debtor Case No.

Claim No. 8657 Nesco Rentals $71,054.59 PG&E Corporation 19-30088

I declare under penalty of perjury that the information provided in this notice is true and correct 

to the best of my knowledge and belief.

By: _____________________ Date: November 27, 2019 

Transferee/Transferee’s Agent

Penalty for making a false statement: Fine of up to $500,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years, 

or both. 18 U.S.C. §§ 152 & 3571. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4883 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 08:55:21 Page 1 of

2
CHEROKEE DEBT ACQUISITION, LLC

1325 Avenue of the Americas, 28th Floor

New York, NY 10019

Attn: Vladimir Jelisavcic

71,054.59

100

CHEROKEE DEBT ACQUISITION, LLC

Vladimir Jelisavcic

Manager

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4883 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 08:55:21 Page 2 of

2
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members         
    -  AEE Multimedia         
    -  AEE Research Library 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# PHOTOS ANDVIDEOS

Search

Search

                                - All Images 
                                - Other 
                                - Space Shuttle 

                                - Upload Date
                                - Photo Date
                                - Title

----

Download Image: Full Size (1.84 MB)

Tags:NORAD, SPACECOM, NORTHCOM, Gen. Milley, CJCS20

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
**EXHIBIT 23.01**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-20057, 333-20073,333-31398, 333-76096,333-76654, 333-85518, 333-106270, 333-106271 and 333-110706) of Education Management Corporation and Subsidiaries of our report dated September 12, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of Education ManagementCorporation and Subsidiaries, Education Management Corporation and Subsidiaries’ management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reportingof Education Management Corporation and Subsidiaries, included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2005. 

 

/s/     ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 

September 12, 2005
Presidential Documents

5571 

Federal Register 

Vol. 81, No. 21 

Tuesday, February 2, 2016 

Title 3— 

The President 

Memorandum of January 29, 2016 

Delegation of Certain Authority and Assignment of Certain 

Functions Under Section 103(a)(1)(A) and Section 103(b)(1) of 

the Bipartisan Congressional Trade Priorities and Accountability Act of 2015 

Memorandum for the United States Trade Representative 

In addition to the authorities and functions delegated and assigned to you 

by Executive Order 13701 of July 17, 2015, by the authority vested in 

me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States 

of America, including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I hereby 

delegate to you the authority to enter into trade agreements, reserved to 

the President in Executive Order 13701, under section 103(a)(1)(A) and 

section 103(b)(1) of the Bipartisan Congressional Trade Priorities and Accountability Act of 2015 (Public Law 114–26, title I), and assign to you 

that function. 

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal 

Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, January 29, 2016 

[FR Doc. 2016–02084 

Filed 2–1–16; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 3190–W1–P 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with O0OB#1.EPS</GPH>
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 1858** 

JOHN PAUL TURNER, a/k/a Pops , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v.

AUGUSTA COUNTY LIBRARY , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke

. Samuel G. Wilson , District Judge. ( 7:11

- cv
- 00361

- SGW )

Submitted : November 2, 2011 Decided: November 15, 2011

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opini on .

John Paul Turner, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

John Paul Turner appeals the district court ’ s order s dismissing this civil action pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1415(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2006), a nd denying his motion for

reconsideration . We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Turner v. Augusta County Library , No.

7:11

- cv
- 00361

- SGW (W.D. Va. July 27, 2011; Au g. 4, 2011) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Meditecnic, Inc. (the "Company") on Form  10-Q for the quarter  ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof  (the "Report"),  I, Bernard Arbalet, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Bernard Arbalet

By: Bernard Arbalet

Chief Executive  Officer

December 15, 2008