alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 241 (Friday, December 15, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Pages 64472-64473]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30703]








National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities
Institute of Museum Services

Notice of Meeting

Summary: This notice sets forth the agenda of a forthcoming meeting of 
the National Museum Services Board. This notice also describes the 
functions of the Board. Notice of this meeting is required under the 
Government through the Sunshine Act (Public Law 94-409) and regulations 
of the Institute of Museum Services, 45 CFR 1180.84.

Time/Date: 10:30 a.m.-1:00 p.m.--Friday, January 12, 1996.

Status: Open.

Address: The Madison Hotel, 15th and M Streets, NW, Washington, DC 
20005, 202/862-1740.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elsa Mezvinsky, Special Assistant to 
the Director, Institute of Museum Services, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, 
N.W., Room 510, Washington, D.C. 20506 (202) 606-8536.

Supplementary information:
    The National Museum Services Board is established under the 
Museum Services Act, Title II of the Arts, Humanities, and Cultural 
Affairs Act of 1976, Public Law 94-462. The Board has responsibility 
for the general policies with respect to the powers, duties, and 
authorities vested in the Institute under the Museum Services Act.
    The meeting of Friday, January 12 will be open to the public.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact: Institute of Museum Services 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, 
N.W., Washington, D.C. 20506 (202) 606-8536 TDD (202) 606-8636 at 
least seven (7) days prior to the meeting date.

65th Meeting of the National Museum Services Board the Madison Hotel, 
Friday, January 12, 1996, 10:30 a.m.--1:00 p.m.

Agenda

I. Chairman's Welcome and Approval of Minutes
II. Director's Report
III. Appropriations Report
IV. Legislative/Public Affairs Report
V. IMS Programs Report
VI. Twentieth Anniversary Report


[[Page 64473]]

    Dated: December 7, 1995.
Linda Bell,

Director of Policy, Planning and Budget, National Foundation on the 
Arts and the Humanities, Institute of Museum Services.

[FR Doc. 95-30703 Filed 12-13-95; 3:44 pm]

BILLING CODE 7036-01-M
**Exhibit 12.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, GregoryA. Yull, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Intertape Polymer Group Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

4. TheCompany’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures [as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)] and internal control over financial reporting [as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)] for the Company and have: 

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b. Designed such internal control over financingreporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and 

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theperiod covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theCompany’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theCompany’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: March 20, 2014
Exhibit
32(a)





ESI
TRACTEBEL ACQUISITION CORP.


(the
registrant)





Section
1350 Certification








We, T.
J. Tuscai and Mark R. Sorensen, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the registrant for the quarterly
      period ended September 30, 2009 (Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      registrant.








Dated:  November
12, 2009














T.
      J. TUSCAI


T.
J. Tuscai


President


(equivalent
to the Chief Executive Officer)


ESI
Tractebel Acquisition Corp.

















MARK
      R. SORENSEN


Mark
R. Sorensen


Treasurer


(equivalent
to the Chief Executive Officer)


ESI
Tractebel Acquisition Corp.
























































A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant
to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and, accordingly, is not being filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the registrant under the Securities
Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after
the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                     151,868,363              70,170,748
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,733,490              24,465,327
<ALLOWANCES>                                 4,178,380               4,283,170
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           165,616,062             100,495,256
<PP&E>                                   1,043,037,686           1,546,043,546
<DEPRECIATION>                              64,994,681             175,591,163
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,160,298,216           1,496,179,251
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       64,566,621              55,297,985
<BONDS>                                    698,320,176             861,616,231
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        41,095                  48,431
<OTHER-SE>                                 397,011,179             577,900,811
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,160,298,216           1,496,179,251
<SALES>                                     48,816,143             129,595,725
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            48,816,143             129,595,725
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,691,067              46,255,673
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            58,811,538             144,547,963
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          14,439,470              27,102,582
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (39,021,200)            (81,358,297)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (39,021,200)            (81,358,297)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (39,021,200)            (81,358,297)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.41)                  (1.70)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 10.2
 US $800,000
    
    March 14, 2006
 GUARANTEED
PROMISSORY NOTE
 Maker Holder
 Interest
 Payments Maturity Date
 Prepayment
 Guaranty Guaranty Guarantors Guaranteed
Obligations




---



##### 



Default Event of
Default
     Collection Costs
 Waiver
 Usury
  Transfer
 2




---



##### 



Governing Law
 Representations and Warranties of Maker
    Representations and Warranties of Guarantors
      Maker:
    
    REMOTE KNOWLEDGE, INC.,a Delaware CorporationBy:
    
    /s/ Randy BayneName: Randy BayneTitle: CEO
 3




---



##### 



Guarantors:
    
    ALAN GRANADER/s/ Alan Granader
 STATE OF Michigan
    
    }} ss.COUNTY OF Oakland
    
    }
 9th
 /s/ Marilyn J. HoldenNotary PublicMy Commission Expires: January 29, 2008 4




---



##### 



DAN GRANADERDan Granader
 STATE OF Montana
    
    }} ss.COUNTY OF Missoula
    
    }
 8
 /s/ Mark C. DvarishkisNotary PublicMy Commission Expires: 8/1/08 HARRY GRANADER/s/ Harry Granader
 STATE OF Michigan
    
    }} ss.COUNTY OF Oakland
    
    }
 9th
 /s/ Marilyn J. HoldenNotary PublicMy Commission Expires: January 29, 2008 5
EXHIBIT 32.1 -- Section 906 Certification of ChiefExecutive Officer

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT OT

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of SBS Technologies, Inc. (the"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the"Report"), I, Clarence W. Peckham, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.   1350, as adopted pursuant to   906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

/s/ Clarence W. Peckham
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Balance
Sheet, Statement of Operations, Statements of Cash Flows and Notes thereto
incorporated in Part II, Item 7. of this Form 10-KSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-01-2000
<CASH>                                             185
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      550
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,418
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,207
<PP&E>                                              98
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,953
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,033
<BONDS>                                            468
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                         437
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,953
<SALES>                                          2,070
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,070
<CGS>                                            1,437
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,146
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (807)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (33)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,673)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,673)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,673)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.12)


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kevin J. Johnson, Appellant.

[773 NYS2d 655]

Appeal from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Donald J. *1051Mark, J.), rendered December 19, 2000. Defendant was resentenced as a persistent felony offender upon his conviction of attempted murder in the second degree and assault in the first degree following this Court’s vacatur of defendant’s sentence.

It is hereby ordered that the resentence so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: The contention of defendant that Supreme Court failed to abide by the terms of our remittal in resentencing him as a persistent felony offender *(People v Johnson,*275 AD2d 949, 951 [2000], *lv denied*95 NY2d 965 [2000]) is not preserved for our review *(see People v Proctor,*79 NY2d 992 [1992]; *People v Hernandez,*273 AD2d 176 [2000], *lv denied*95 NY2d 890, 935 [2000]; *People v Banks,*265 AD2d 163 [1999], *lv denied*94 NY2d 819 [1999]). In any event, defendant’s contention lacks merit.

Defendant contends in a pro se supplemental brief that the procedure pursuant to which he was resentenced as a persistent felony offender is unconstitutional. That contention is not preserved for our review and, in any event, is without merit *(see People v Rosen,*96 NY2d 329, 334-335 [2001], *cert denied*534 US 899 [2001]). We conclude that defendant’s remaining contention in the pro se supplemental brief also is without merit. Present—Wisner, J.P., Hurlbutt, Kehoe, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 250 (Friday, December 29, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 67359]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31456]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Gerald E. Long; Change in Bank Control Notice


Acquisition of Shares of Banks or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificant listed below has applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on notices are set forth in 
paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notice is available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. Once the notice has been accepted for 
processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices of 
the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in 
writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for the notice or to the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than 
January 12, 1996.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (James M. Lyon, Vice 
President) 250 Marquette Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480:
    1. Gerald E. Long, Bottineau, North Dakota; to acquire an 
additional 2.07 percent, for a total of 14.75 percent, of the voting 
shares of State Bank of Bottineau Holding Company, Bottineau, North 
Dakota, and thereby indirectly acquire State Bank of Bottineau, 
Bottineau, North Dakota.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 22, 
1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-31456 Filed 12-28-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

**EDWARD L. WRIGHT, Appellant** 

**v.**

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE,**  **Appellee :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: No. 24 EAP 2015**  **Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court entered on 4/21/15**  **at No. 186 MD 2015**

**.**

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW **, this 21st day of December, 2015, the Order of the Co mmonwealth** 

**Court is AFFIRMED.**
#### STATE v. WADIS BROWN and Surety, TAR HEEL BOND COMPANY, INC.

(Filed 30 October, 1940.)

1. Bail § 4—

Judgment *nisi*may be made absolute against the surety upon the hearing of the *sei. fa.*notwithstanding that the *sei. fa.*has not been served upon the principal.

2. Same—

Upon defendant’s plea to an offense less than that charged in the warrant, judgment was suspended upon condition that defendant pay the cost. Defendant was given until Monday of the second week of the term in which to pay the cost. Defendant failed to appear when called Monday of the second week of the term. *Helé:*Since defendant was permitted to remain at large under the bond until the second Monday of the term, his failure to appear at that time constitutes a forfeiture of his appearance bond, and the judgment *nisi*was properly made absolute against the surety upon the hearing of the *sei. fa.*

Appeal by respondent Tar Heel Bond Co., Inc., from *Phillips, J.,*at May Term, 1940, of RowaN.

Affirmed.

Proceeding on appearance bond.

One Wadis Brown having been arrested on a charge of reckless driving, on 17 August, 1937, executed his appearance bond returnable to the September Term, 1939, Rowan Superior Court, with the respondent as surety thereon. The case was called for trial at the February Term, 1940, at which time the defendant entered a plea to an offense less than that charged in the warrant and judgment was suspended upon condition that the defendant pay the cost. The defendant was given by the *369court until Monday of the second week in which to pay the cost. On Monday of the second week the defendant was duly called and failed to answer. Thereupon, judgment *nisi was*entered and *sci. fa.*and *capias*was ordered. The *sci. fa.*was served upon the surety-but not upon the principal. The surety, in response to the *sci. fa.*served, appeared and answered. When the matter was heard upon the return of the *sci. fa.,*after consideration of respondent’s answer, judgment absolute was entered. Eespondent excepted and appealed.

*T. G. Furr, Attorney-General McMullan, and Assistant Attorney-General Patton for the State.*

*G. P. Barringer for respondent, appellant.*

BaRNHill, J.

The appellant contends that it was error for the court *to*enter judgment absolute on the *sci. fa.*until such *sci. fa.*had been served on the principal and that, therefore, the judgment pronounced is voidable and unenforceable. The question thus sought to be presented is decided by this Court in *Bond Co. v. Krider, ante,*361. The decision in that case is controlling. As the defendant Brown was permitted t0‘ remain at large under the bond until the second Monday of the court, his failure to appear constitutes a forfeiture thereof. *S. v. Staley,*200 N. C., 385, 157 S. E., 25.

Affirmed.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Jeffery David James, Appellant

No. 06-20-00021-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 7th District Court of Smith

County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 007-0352-19). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief 

Justice Morriss, Justice Burgess and Justice 

Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the bill of costs included an 

improper assessment of attorney fees. Therefore, we modify the bill of costs by deleting the 

$300.00 assessment for attorney fees and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Jeffery David James, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED OCTOBER 16, 2020

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#### Commonwealth *vs.*Ernest E. Whitcomb.

Hampshire.

September 16, 1931.

October 1, 1931.

Present: Rügg, C.J., Crosby, Carroll, Sanderson, & Field, JJ.

*Practice, Criminal,*Ordering verdict.

An exception, saved by the defendant at the trial of an indictment to the denial of a motion that a verdict of not guilty be ordered, will not be sustained where the record discloses evidence warranting a verdict of guilty of the crime charged, although there was evidence sufficient to prove a different crime from that laid in the indictment.

Indictment, found and returned on February 18, 1931, charging the defendant with committing unnatural and lascivious acts with a young woman.

In the Superior Court, the indictment was tried before *Beaudreau,*J. At the close of the evidence, the defendant moved that a verdict of not guilty be ordered. The motion was denied. The defendant was found guilty and alleged exceptions.

*28
      *D. D. O’Brien,*for the defendant.

*J. T. Bartlett,*District Attorney, for the Commonwealth, submitted a brief.

Rugg, C.J.

This indictment charged the defendant in two counts with committing unnatural and lascivious acts with a young woman. G. L. c. 272, § 35. The only question raised is whether a verdict ought to have been directed in favor of the defendant. There was ample evidence, which need not be narrated nor summarized, to support the charge. There is nothing inconsistent with this result in *Commonwealth*v. *Delano,*197 Mass. 166. If it be assumed, but without so deciding, that there was evidence sufficient to prove a different crime from that laid in the indictment, the jury were not obliged to believe that evidence. The testimony supporting the contentions of the Commonwealth alone may have been given credence, and all that of a contrary tendency may have been distrusted and rejected as untrue. *Commonwealth*v. *Russ,*232 Mass. 58, 70. *Whiteacre*v. *Boston Elevated Railway,*241 Mass. 163. *Goodell*v. *Sviokcla,*262 Mass. 317, 319. *Haun*v. *LeGrand,*268 Mass. 582, 584. Even if the testimony of the young woman witness was not altogether consistent, the part or parts to be accepted as true were for the jury. The decision in *Sullivan*v. *Boston Elevated Railway,*224 Mass. 405, is not applicable to the testimony here disclosed.

*Exceptions overruled.*