alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANTS' CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND
THE RELATED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001058872
<NAME> THE RESORT AT SUMMERLIN, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               4
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      337
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   337
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     436
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                6
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           683
<OTHER-SE>                                       (253)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       436
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   337
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   453
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (116)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (116)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (116)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### R. T. WILLIAMS v. D. U. BRUTON.

(Filed 8 June, 1940.)

Agriculture § 7e—

Evidence *held*sufficient to be submitted to jury in tbis action by a tenant to recover damages for breach of contract by his landlord in failing to give the tenant the tobacco allotment stipulated in the agreement.

Devin and Baeniiill, JJ., dissent.

*700Appeal by plaintiff from *Stevens, J.,*at tbe February Term, 1940, of ROBESON.

*McKinnon, Nance & Seawell for plaintiff, appellant.*

*F. D. Haclcett for defendant, appellee.*

Schenck, *J.*

Tbis is an action to recover damages alleged to bave been caused by a breach of contract, and was formerly before us at tbe Fall Term, 1939 (216 N. C., 582). In tbe former opinion, wbicb reversed a judgment sustaining a demurrer upon tbe ground that tbe complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, it is said: “Tbe contract, its breach and consequent damage are alleged, whether such can be proved is for determination upon tbe evidence adduced.”

Tbe contract alleged was that tbe defendant, as landlord, agreed to rent one-half of tbe 10%-acre tobacco allotment made to him by tbe Government to tbe plaintiff, as tenant, for tbe farming year 1938, and to give tbe plaintiff one-half of tbe poundage allotted for tbe 5% acres rented to him; and tbe plaintiff agreed to make a tobacco crop. There was evidence tending to show that tbe plaintiff made a crop on tbe 514 acres and raised and sold 4,336 pounds of tobacco; that tbe poundage allotment made to tbe defendant for tbe 101/2 acres was 16,190 pounds, that one-half of tbis allotment was 8,095 pounds; that after selling 4,336 pounds of tobacco there was left on bis and bis landlord’s portion of tbe poundage allotment 3,759 pounds; that one-half of tbis last mentioned number, 1,879 pounds, belonged to plaintiff; that tbis unused poundage was valued at 5c per pound, wbicb amounted to $93.95; that tbe defendant has tendered tbe plaintiff $16.28 “in full for left-over poundage” wbicb plaintiff refused, and demanded tbe full sum of $93.95.

*We*are of tbe opinion, and so bold, that tbe evidence adduced was sufficient to be submitted to tbe jury for determination of tbe issue involved, and that tbe judge of tbe Superior Court erred in sustaining tbe motion of tbe defendant for a judgment as in case of nonsuit when tbe plaintiff bad introduced bis evidence and rested bis case.

Reversed.

DeviN and BabNhill, JJ., dissent.
#### Henry A. Deimel and another v. William R. Oluey.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on opinion of Merwin, J., at Special Term.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 9433]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257-1 of December 11, 2015), I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Edgar Degas: A Strange New Beauty,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Museum of Modern Art, New York, New York, from on or about March 26, 2016, until on or about July 24, 2016, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        For further information, including a list of the imported objects, contact the Office of Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs in the Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

 Dated: January 29, 2016.

Mark Taplin,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2016-02262 Filed 2-3-16; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
### Proposed Provision: E2.16. Apply OASDI 12.4 percent payroll tax rate on earnings above $250,000 starting in 2024, and tax all earnings once the current-law taxable maximum exceeds $250,000. Increase the computed level of the SSA average wage index for years after 2023 by amounts ranging from 0.6 percent for 2024 to 0.9 percent for 2034 and later.  Provide benefit credit for earnings above the current-law taxable maximum that are subject to the payroll tax, using a secondary PIA formula. This secondary PIA formula involves: (1) an "AIME+" derived from annual earnings from each year after 2023 that were in excess of that year's current-law taxable maximum; and (2) a formula factor of 2 percent on this newly computed "AIME+".
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3408 

To amend chapter 36 of title 44, United States Code, to require reporting 

regarding the security of cloud computing products and services. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 15, 2021 

Mr. OSSOFF introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend chapter 36 of title 44, United States Code, to 

require reporting regarding the security of cloud computing products and services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Cloud Risk 

5 Management Improvements Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPORTING REGARDING SECURITY OF CLOUD COM7 PUTING PRODUCTS AND SERVICES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 36 of title 44, United 

9 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol10 lowing: 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3408 IS

1 ‘‘§ 3607. Reporting regarding security of cloud com2 puting products and services 

3 ‘‘(a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

4 ‘‘(1) AGENCY.—The term ‘agency’ has the 

5 meaning given the term in section 3502. 

6 ‘‘(2) CLOUD COMPUTING.—The term ‘cloud 

7 computing’ has the meaning given the term in Spe8 cial Publication 800–145 of the National Institute of 

9 Standards and Technology, or any successor docu10 ment. 

11 ‘‘(3) CLOUD SERVICE PROVIDER.—The term 

12 ‘cloud service provider’ means an entity offering 

13 cloud computing products or services to agencies. 

14 ‘‘(b) REPORTING.—Not later than 1 year after the 

15 date of enactment of this section, and annually thereafter, 

16 the Administrator of General Services shall submit to the 

17 Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Af18 fairs of the Senate and the Committee on Oversight and 

19 Reform of the House of Representatives a report that in20 cludes a review of measures taken under the Federal Risk 

21 and Authorization Management Program, or any suc22 cessor thereto, to ensure the security of data stored or 

23 processed by cloud service providers, which may include— 

24 ‘‘(1) geolocation restrictions for provided prod25 ucts or services; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3408 IS

1 ‘‘(2) disclosures of foreign elements of supply 

2 chains of acquired products or services; 

3 ‘‘(3) regular disclosures of ownership of cloud 

4 service providers by foreign entities; and 

5 ‘‘(4) encryption requirements for data proc6 essed, stored, or transmitted by cloud service pro7 viders.’’. 

8 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of sec9 tions for chapter 36 of title 44, United States Code, is 

10 amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘3607. Reporting regarding security of cloud computing products and services.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
#### ADAM SONDEY et al. v. J. W. YATES et al.

(Filed 18 September, 1935.)

Appeal and Error J d—

Where tbe Supreme Court is evenly divided in opinion, one Justice not sitting, tbe judgments of tbe lower court appealed from will be affirmed without becoming precedents.

Appeal by plaintiffs from *Grady, J.,*at December Term, 1934, of New Hahovee.

Civil actions by depositors to recover of officers and directors of Home Savings Bank losses alleged to bave been sustained by reason of deposits, wrongfully induced, and kept in insolvent bank, consolidated for purpose of trial, and beard upon demurrers and pleas in abatement.

From judgments sustaining tbe demurrers and upholding tbe pleas in abatement, tbe plaintiffs appeal, assigning errors.

*Louis Goodman, W. F. J ones, J ames 8. Maiming, and Hem-y Averill for plaintiffs.*

*J. 0. Carr for defendants Scott, Van Leuven, and Taylor.*

*Thomas W. Davis for defendants Davis and Scott.*

*Marsden Bellamy for defendants*7» *Leuven and Taylor.*

*George Rountree for defendant Tates.*

*Varser, McIntyre & Henry for defendants Moore, Bluethenthdl, and Huggins.*

*Gyrus D. Hogue for defendants Dutch and Parmele.*

Pee Cueiam.

Tbe Court being equally divided in opinion, *Stacy, G. J.,*not sitting, tbe judgments of tbe Superior Court are affirmed in accordance with tbe usual practice in such cases, and stand as tbe decisions in these cases without becoming precedents. *Smith v. Powell, post,*837.

Affirmed.
#### HENRY LEE DERBY v. W. W. OWENS, Individually, and t/a W. W. OWENS & SON, and PAUL JEFFERS.

(Filed 27 February, 1957.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *Bone, J.,*September, 1956 Term, Pasquo-taNK Superior Court.

Civil action for personal injury tried upon issues of negligence, contributory negligence, and damages. The jury answered all issues in favor of the plaintiff, assessing damages at $5,000.00. The court denied plaintiff’s motions to set aside the verdict (1) on the third issue, and (2) in its entirety. From a judgment in accordance with the verdict, the plaintiff appealed, assigning errors.

*John H. Hall for plaintiff, appellant.*

*Wilson & Wilson,*

*By: J. Kenyon Wilson, for defendants, appellees.*

Pee Cueiam.

The plaintiff’s assignments of error relate to the charge. Particularly, he contends that even in the absence of a request the judge committed reversible error in failing 'to instruct the jury that the plaintiff had a life expectancy of 15.27 years according to the mortuary table (G.S. 8-46) which he had introduced in evidence. Although the charge did not contain a direct reference to the plaintiff’s life expectancy, the court did instruct the jury to take into consideration all the evidence bearing on the issue, including the plaintiff’s age. The court, with clarity and accuracy, applied to the evidence in the case rules of law as they have been approved by this Court.

In the judgment we find

No error.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces its intent to hold proposal review meetings throughout the year. The purpose of these meetings is to provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to the NSF for financial support. The agenda for each of these meetings is to review and evaluate proposals as part of the selection process for awards. The review and evaluation may also include assessment of the progress of awarded proposals. The majority of these meetings will take place at NSF, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, Virginia 22230.

These meetings will be closed to the public. The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act. NSF will continue to review the agenda and merits of each meeting for overall compliance of the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

                    These closed proposal review meetings will not be announced on an individual basis in the                     **Federal Register**                    . NSF intends to publish a notice similar to this on a quarterly basis. For an advance listing of the closed proposal review meetings that include the names of the proposal review panel and the time, date, place, and any information on changes, corrections, or cancellations, please visit the NSF Web site:                     *http://www.nsf.gov/​events/​.*                     This information may also be requested by telephoning, 703/292-8687.                

Dated: February 1, 2016.

Crystal Robinson,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2016-02083 Filed 2-3-16; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Skip to main content

# Social Security

Search
Menu
Español
Sign in

## Social Security Benefit Tables

Office of the Chief Actuary 

Automatic Determinations

Beneficiary Data

Cost-of-Living Adjustments

Contribution & Benefit Base

**Special Minimum Benefit Tables**          To be eligible for a special minimum benefit, a person must have      at least 11 years of coverage.  A person acquires a      year of coverage by having a certain       minimum amount of earnings in the year.      
      Before 1979, the special minimum benefit amounts did not increase when benefit increases occurred. Legislation 	  provided the benefit amounts for January 1973, March 1974, and January 1979. Automatic benefit increases,       or cost-of-living adjustments,      first increased the benefits beginning with June 1979.

      For each year in which a benefit increase became effective, we provide a special minimum table which relates a 	  year of coverage to a special minimum benefit called a *Primary Insurance Amount*. This form allows you 	  to select a year from 1973 to the present.  If no benefit increase became effective in the year you select, we 	  will give you the table for the last prior year in which an increase became effective.  For example, no benefit 	  increases became effective in 2009 and 2010, so if you were to select 2010, you would get the table effective 	  for December 2008.

      Enter year for specific table:             (1973 to present)              

**Benefit Tables For Persons Eligible Before 1979**      For persons eligible for benefits before 1979, or for deaths      prior to 1979, benefits are determined on the basis of Primary      Insurance Amounts (PIAs) given either by tables or, for years prior      to 1959, by formulas.  In either case, a person's PIA depends on the       Average Monthly Wage computed on the basis of that individual's      earnings record.  (For persons eligible after 1978, benefits are computed      using formulas instead of tables.)

      This form allows you to select a year from 1959 to the present.  The      PIA table that became effective in the selected year will be provided.      

      Before automatic benefit increases existed, there were years where      no benefit increase occurred. If no table became effective in the year you select,       the table which provided benefits in that year will be given.      There were no cost-of-living adjustments effective December 2009 or December 2010,       so the table effective for December 2008 remained the benefit table in effect until December 2011.      

      Enter year for specific table:             (1959 to present)               
Footer menu
LaSalle
      Bank N.A.135
      South LaSalle StreetSuite
      1625Chicago,
      IL 60603Global
      Securities and Trust Services




Annual
Statement of Compliance
 
 VIA:
EMAIL
 
 Bear
Stearns Asset Backed Securities I LLC
 383
Madison Avenue
 New York,
New York 10179
 regabnotifications@bear.com
 
 EMC
Mortgage Corporation
 2780 Lake
Vista Drive
 Irving,
Texas 75067
 
 Re:           Bear
Stearns Mortgage Funding Trust 2007-SL1
 
 
 Reference
is made to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of January 1, 2007 (the
“Agreement”), among Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I LLC, as Depositor,
EMC Mortgage Corporation, as Seller and Master Servicer, and LaSalle Bank
National Association, as Trustee.
 
 I,
Barbara L. Marik, a Senior Vice President of LaSalle Bank National Association,
as Trustee hereby certify that:
 
 (1)
A review of the activities of the Trustee during the preceding calendar year and
of the performance of the Trustee under the Agreement has been made under my
supervision; and
 
 (2)
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled all
its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such
year or a portion thereof.
 
 
 Date:
February 27, 2008
 
 LaSalle
Bank National Association, as Trustee
 
 
 /s/
Barbara L. Marik
 Barbara
L. Marik
 Senior
Vice President
Please wait... 

 

If this message is not eventually replaced by the proper contents of the document, your PDF 

viewer may not be able to display this type of document. 

 

You can upgrade to the latest version of Adobe Reader for Windows®, Mac, or Linux® by 

visiting http://www.adobe.com/go/reader_download. 

 

For more assistance with Adobe Reader visit http://www.adobe.com/go/acrreader. 

 

Windows is either a registered trademark or a trademark of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries. Mac is a trademark 

of Apple Inc., registered in the United States and other countries. Linux is the registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the U.S. and other 

countries.

ACCEPTED

06-15-00095-CV

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

11/2/2015 4:43:16 PM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 11/3/2015 9:29:00 AM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 245 (Thursday, December 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 66320]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31068]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[NM-952-06-1420-00]


Notice of Filing of Plat of Survey; New Mexico

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The plat of survey described below was officially filed in the 
New Mexico State Office, Bureau of Land Management, Santa Fe, New 
Mexico, on December 4, 1995.

New Mexico Principal Meridian, New Mexico

T. 20 N., R.10 E., Accepted December 1, 1995, for Group 914 NM.

    A person or party who wishes to protest against this survey must 
file a written protest with the State Director, Bureau of Land 
Management, that they wish to protest.
    A statement of reasons for a protest may be filed with the notice 
of protest to the State Director, or the statement of reasons must be 
filed with the State Director within thirty (30) days after the protest 
is filed.
    The above-listed plats represent dependent resurveys, surveys, and 
subdivisions.
    This plat will be in the New Mexico State Office, Bureau of Land 
Management, P.O. Box 27115, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87502-0115. Copies may 
be obtained from this office upon payment of $1.10 per sheet.

    Dated: December 4, 1995.
John P. Bennett,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor For New Mexico.
[FR Doc. 95-31068 Filed 12-20-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-FB-M