alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report of Casey Container, Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Terry W. Neild,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Terry W. Neild
----------------------------------
Terry W. Neild
Chief Financial Officer
April 12, 2010

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; “Investigator Initiated Clinical Planning (R34) and Implementation (R01) Grants.”                    

*Date:*                         February 19, 2016.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Raymond R. Schleef, Ph.D., Senior Scientific Review Officer,  Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, Room 3E61, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 5601 Fishers Lane, MSC 9823, Bethesda, MD 20892-9823, (240) 669-5019,                         *schleefrr@niaid.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 29, 2016.

Natasha M. Copeland,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2016-02052 Filed 2-3-16; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 6763** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. ANTHONY JOHNSON, a/k/a AJ , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the M iddle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro
. James A. Beaty, Jr. , Chief District Judge. ( 2:95

- cr - 00249

- TDS

- 7 )

Submitted : January 1 8 , 2012 Decided: February 8, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ , and KING , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published pe r curiam opinion
. Anthony Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CUR IAM: Anthony Johnson appeals the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (200 6 ) motion for reduction of sentence . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Johnson , No. 2:95

- cr 00249

- TDS

- 7 (M.D.N.C. June 2, 2011) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the de cisional process.
AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1082

STATIC CONTROL COMPONENTS, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. REZA H. AHMADI; INTELLIGENT OFFICE PRODUCTS, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas David Schroeder, District Judge. (1:07-cv-00281-TDS-RAE)

Submitted: December 17, 2009 Decided: December 23, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reza H. Ahmadi, Appellant Pro Se. William L. London, III, Sanford, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Reza H. Ahmadi and his corporation Intelligent Office Products, Inc. seek to appeal the district court’s final order entering a default judgment against them. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of

Corr. , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v.

Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on December 4, 2008. The notice of appeal was filed on January 6, 2009. Because Appellants failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  In connection with the Annual Report of Tara Minerals Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending October 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), Francis Richard Biscan, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer and Clifford A. Brown the Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of their knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects the financial condition and results of the Company.  By: /s/ Francis Richard Biscan Jr. Francis Richard Biscan, Jr., Chief Executive Officer  By: /s/ Clifford A. Brown Clifford A. Brown, Principal Financial Officer  January 18, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
     TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                        3,431
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       21,910
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                             13,160
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 326,772
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                            0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                              0
<LOANS>                                     186,910
<ALLOWANCE>                                   1,486
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              592,534
<DEPOSITS>                                  318,314
<SHORT-TERM>                                      0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         198,226
<LONG-TERM>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                        900
<OTHER-SE>                                   75,094
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              592,534
<INTEREST-LOAN>                               7,024
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            12,597
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             19,621
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                            6,902
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           11,875
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                         7,746
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   240
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              506
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                               4,764
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               3,695
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                  2,885
<EPS-BASIC>                                     .41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   .41
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 2.81
<LOANS-NON>                                     211
<LOANS-PAST>                                    211
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                115
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 470
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                              1,234
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    13
<RECOVERIES>                                     25
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                             1,486
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                          1,486
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                               0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           0



</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 24-0208

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

THERESA MARIE WALKER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including November 15, 2024, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 3 2024

10/03/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0208
#### W. A. STEELMAN v. HANS REES' SONS, INC.

(Filed 18 October, 1939.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *Rousseau, J.,*at July Term, 1939, of Buncombe.

Affirmed.

This was an action for actionable negligence brought by plaintiff against defendant in the general county court of Buncombe County, *802Tbe plaintiff contended that defendant did not exercise due care in that it negligently failed to provide plaintiff witb a safe place in which to do his work. The defendant (1) denied negligence, (2) set up a plea of payment, (3) a plea of contributory negligence and assumption of risk, (4) the statute of limitations. The plaintiff in reply challenged all of the defenses made by defendant.

The issues submitted to the county court of Buncombe County were answered in favor of plaintiff. Judgment was rendered on the verdict. The defendant made numerous exceptions and assignments of error and appealed to the Superior Court. The court below rendered judgment reversing the judgment of the general county court and said: “It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff be nonsuited and that he recover nothing of the defendant; that his cause be dismissed and the plaintiff pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the clerk; that the clerk of this court certify a copy of this judgment to the general county court of Buncombe County.”

The plaintiff made numerous exceptions and assignments of error and appealed to the Supreme Court.

*Sale, Pennell & Pennell and Don C. Young for plaintiff.*

*Harkins, Van Winkle & Walton for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

We have read the record with care and the briefs of the litigants. We see no new or novel proposition of law presented and think the judgment of the court below is correct. The same is therefore

Affirmed.
#### Thomas Cornell, Respondent, v. William Hayden, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.-

Opinion by

Landon, J.;

Bockes, J., concurs m opinion of Special Term, supplemented by opinion of Landon J.; Learned, P. J., dissents.
## Summary Measures and Graphs

- Individual Provisions
- Level of Monthly Benefits

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						B1.5: Progressive price indexing (60th percentile) of PIA factors beginning with individuals newly eligible for OASDI benefits in 2030: Create a new bend point at the 60th percentile of the AIME distribution of newly retired workers. Maintain current-law benefits for earners at the 60th percentile and below. Reduce the 32 and 15 percent factors above the 60th percentile such that the initial benefit for a worker with AIME equal to the taxable maximum grows by inflation rather than the growth in the SSA average wage index.**

|  |  |
|--|--|
Skip to main content

# Social Security

Search
Menu
Español
Sign in

## Single-Year Tables Consistent With 2018 OASDI Trustees Report

2018 OASDI Trustees Report

      The tables listed below provide estimates by      alternative economic and/or demographic assumptions.      For some of the tables, we also provide historical data.      The tables carry the same designation as in the published report.      Reference should be made to the report      to understand the context in which the estimates are presented.      

      To allow easier access for people who may want to work with the data, we      also supply the tables in Excel.      

 

Questions?   Address questions about  these tables to actuary@ssa.gov.

Footer menu
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Unizan Financial Corp.s (the
Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Roger L. Mann, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 9, 2004 |  | /s/ Roger L. Mann                    
|                     |  | Roger L. Mann                        
|                     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of CSB Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, John J. Limbert, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ John J. LimbertJohn J. LimbertPresident and Chief ExecutiveOfficer
 March 24, 2005 23
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         10,163
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         3,492
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               777
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    10,421
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         24,481
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           24,265
<LOANS>                                        203,242
<ALLOWANCE>                                    2,161
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 264,140
<DEPOSITS>                                     228,163
<SHORT-TERM>                                   5,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            1,258
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       16,839
<OTHER-SE>                                     12,880
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 264,140
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                4,439
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              463
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               69
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               4,971
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             1,814
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,814
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          3,157
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  255
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                2,706
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                753
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     544
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   544
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.12
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 1.31
<LOANS-NON>                                    943
<LOANS-PAST>                                   0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               2,020
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  121
<RECOVERIES>                                   7
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              2,161
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           1,714
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        447



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 577 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 577

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the conditions under 
     which certain persons may be treated as adjudicated mentally 
                   incompetent for certain purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2013

 Mr. Stockman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the conditions under 
     which certain persons may be treated as adjudicated mentally 
                   incompetent for certain purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Second Amendment Protection 
Act''.

SEC. 2. CONDITIONS FOR TREATMENT OF CERTAIN PERSONS AS ADJUDICATED 
              MENTALLY INCOMPETENT FOR CERTAIN PURPOSES.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 55 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 5511. Conditions for treatment of certain persons as adjudicated 
              mentally incompetent for certain purposes
    ``In any case arising out of the administration by the Secretary of 
laws and benefits under this title, a person who is mentally 
incapacitated, deemed mentally incompetent, or experiencing an extended 
loss of consciousness shall not be considered adjudicated as a mental 
defective under subsection (d)(4) or (g)(4) of section 922 of title 18 
without the order or finding of a judge, magistrate, or other judicial 
authority of competent jurisdiction that such person is a danger to 
himself or herself or others.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 55 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following 
new item:

``5511. Conditions for treatment of certain persons as adjudicated 
                            mentally incompetent for certain 
                            purposes.''.
                                 <all>
```