SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION BALTIMORE, MD 21235-0001

SOCIAL SECURITY

Office of the Chief Actuary

November 9, 2011

The Honorable Jason Chaffetz

House of Representatives

Washington, DC 20515

Dear Mr. Chaffetz:

I am writing in response to your request for estimates of the financial effects on Social Security 

of your proposal to restore sustainable solvency for the program. We have enjoyed working 

closely with you and Mike Jerman of your staff in developing this proposal to meet your goals. 

The proposal includes seven provisions with direct effects on benefits and tax revenues for the 

Old Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance (OASDI) program. We refer to these seven 

provisions as the basic Social Security provisions. The remaining provision, which establishes 

voluntary add-on personal savings accounts, does not have a direct effect on benefits and tax 

revenues for the OASDI program.

The enclosed tables provide estimates of the effects of the basic Social Security provisions on the 

cost, income, and trust fund assets for the OASDI program, as well as the estimated effects on 

retired worker benefit levels for selected hypothetical workers. In addition, tables 1b and 1b.n 

reflect the Federal budget implications of the basic Social Security provisions. For these tables, 

we did not reflect the effects of voluntary add-on personal savings accounts. We estimate that 

enactment of the basic provisions in this proposal would maintain solvency of the OASDI 

program throughout the long-range (75-year) projection period and would fulfill the 

requirements for sustainable solvency. We base all estimates on the intermediate assumptions of 

the 2011 Trustees Report. 

The estimates provided here reflect the combined effort of many in the Office of the Chief 

Actuary, but most particularly Alice Wade, Christopher Chaplain, Daniel Nickerson, and Tiffany 

Bosley.

The proposal includes the following eight provisions. The first seven provisions comprise the 

basic Social Security provisions and have significant direct effects on the OASDI program 

financial operations and actuarial status:

1) After the normal retirement age (NRA) reaches 67 for those attaining age 62 in 2022, 

increase the NRA by 2 months per year until it reaches 69 for those attaining age 62 in 

2034. Thereafter, increase the NRA by 1 month every 2 years. Allow retired workers 

reaching 62 in 2022 and later to earn delayed retirement credits during the first 36 months 

after attaining NRA. Retain the current-law earliest eligibility age at 62. 

2) Starting with December 2015, compute the cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) using a 

chain-weighted version of the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and 

Clerical Workers (C-CPI-W). We estimate this new computation results in an annual 

COLA that averages 0.3 percentage point less than the current-law COLA. 
2

3) Establish progressive price indexing of PIA formula factors beginning with retired 

workers newly eligible for benefits in 2016 and stopping with retired workers newly 

eligible for benefits in 2055. Create a new bend point at the 50th percentile of careeraverage earnings. Maintain current-law benefits for earners at the 50th percentile and 

below and reduce the formula factors (32 percent and 15 percent) that apply above the 

new bend point such that the PIA for steady maximum workers grows across generations 

by the CPI-W growth, rather than by the growth in the average wage. This provision does 

not affect disability benefits. However, disabled worker beneficiaries, upon attaining 

normal retirement age, are subject to a proportional reduction based on the worker's 

number of non-disabled years at ages 22 through 61.

4) Increase the number of benefit computation years for retirees and survivors, adding one 

additional computation year for those becoming eligible in 2012, 2014, 2016, 2018, and 

2020.

5) Replace the PIA with a special minimum amount, if higher, for workers who have at least 

30 creditable years. A year is creditable if the worker earned four quarters of coverage. 

Phase in the percentage of this special minimum amount linearly, from 0 percent of the 

amount for those with 10 or fewer creditable years to 100 percent for those with 30 or 

more creditable years. Allow up to 5 years when caring for a child under the age of 6 to 

be creditable, if not otherwise counted as a creditable year. Scale the creditable year 

requirements and number of child-care years for disabled workers and workers dying 

under age 62 based on the proportion of years from 22 through 61 alive and not disabled. 

This provision is effective for individuals newly eligible for benefits in 2012 and later. 

The special minimum amount for those newly eligible in 2012 is the HHS poverty level 

for 2011, $908, multiplied by the increase in the CPI-W for 2011. For those newly 

eligible after 2012, this amount rises by the increase in Social Security’s average age 

index (AWI).

6) Provide a 5-percent increase to the benefit level of any beneficiary who is 85 or older at 

the beginning of 2012 or who reaches their 85th birthday after the beginning of 2012. 

7) Reduce individual Social Security benefits if modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) is 

above $60,000 for single taxpayers or $120,000 for taxpayers filing jointly. For this 

purpose, MAGI equals adjusted gross income less taxable Social Security benefits plus

nontaxable interest income. This provision is effective for individuals newly eligible for 

benefits in 2019 or later. The percentage reduction increases from 0 percent for 

single/joint filers with MAGI up to $60,000/$120,000, to 50 percent for single/joint filers 

with MAGI of $180,000/$360,000 or above. The $60,000/$120,000 and

$180,000/$360,000 thresholds apply to benefits in 2019 using tax return data from 2017, 

or two years prior. For years after 2019, thresholds rise by the increase in the AWI. 

8) Separate personal accounts: Provide for default participation by all workers in a personal 

savings account, with the option to disenroll. Contributions equal to 2 percent of OASDI 

taxable earnings would be redirected from employee pay, but would not affect the payroll 

tax rate for the OASDI program. Several index funds would be offered, similar to the 

structure of the Federal Thrift Savings Plan, with the default being a “life-cycle” fund. 

Timing and further specifications for these accounts are yet to be determined. The 

personal accounts would have no direct effects on OASDI taxes or benefits.

The balance of this letter provides a summary of the effects of the proposal on the actuarial status 

of the OASDI program, our understanding of the specifications of each provision, the estimated 

effects on OASDI actuarial status, and a description of our detailed financial results.
3

Summary of Effects of the Proposal on OASDI Actuarial Status

Figure 1 below illustrates the expected change in the combined Old-Age and Survivors Insurance 

(OASI) and Disability Insurance (DI) Trust Fund assets, expressed as a percent of annual 

program cost, assuming enactment of the basic Social Security provisions. Assuming enactment, 

the OASDI program would be expected to be solvent for the next 75 years, under the 

intermediate assumptions of the 2011 Trustees Report. The level of assets for the theoretical 

combined OASI and DI Trust Funds would decline from 353 percent of annual program cost at 

the beginning of 2011 to 84 percent of annual cost in 2048. Thereafter, the trust funds would rise, 

reaching 298 percent of annual program cost by the end of 2085. The combined assets would be 

rising as a percentage of the annual cost of the program at the end of the period. Thus, the 

OASDI program would meet the requirements for sustainable solvency with enactment of this

proposal. 

Figure 1. Present Law and Proposal OASDI Trust Fund Assets as Percent of Annual Cost: 2011 TR 

Intermediate Assumptions

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

2011 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Trust Fund Ratio

Present Law Trust Fund Ratio

Proposal

Note: Trust Fund Ratio for a given year is the ratio of assets in the combined OASI and DI Trust Funds at the 

beginning of the year to the cost of the program during the year.

Enactment of the basic Social Security provisions would eliminate the long-range OASDI 

actuarial deficit of 2.22 percent of taxable payroll under current law, and would result in a 

positive OASDI actuarial balance of 0.21 percent of payroll for the long-range period. 
4

Figure 2 below illustrates annual projected levels of cost, expenditures, and tax income as a 

percent of the current-law level of taxable payroll. The projected levels of cost reflect the full 

cost of present-law scheduled benefits. After trust fund exhaustion, projected expenditures under 

current law include only amounts payable from projected revenues, which are less than projected 

cost. With enactment of the basic Social Security provisions, we do not expect the combined 

OASI and DI Trust Funds to exhaust, so payable benefits (expenditures) equal scheduled benefits 

over the 75-year projection period.

Figure 2. Proposal and Present Law Cost and Non-Interest Income as Percent of Taxable Payroll: 

2011 TR Intermediate Assumptions

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

2011 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent of Present-Law Taxable Payroll

Present Law Non-Interest Income

Present Law Cost

Present Law Expenditures

Proposal Cost

Proposal Non-Interest Income

Aggregate OASDI program cost is reduced under the proposal after 2016. Non-interest income is 

reduced slightly under the proposal because less income tax revenue would be generated from 

the taxation of Social Security benefits under this proposal. The annual non-interest income for 

the OASDI program is projected to exceed the projected cost after 2050, providing positive net 

cash flow through 2085 and beyond. 
5

It is also useful to consider the projected cost and income for the OASDI program expressed as a 

percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). The graph below illustrates these levels under 

both current law and the seven basic Social Security provisions of the proposal. 

Figure 3. Proposal and Present Law Cost and Non-Interest Income as Percent of GDP: 2011 TR 

Intermediate Assumptions

4.0

4.5

5.0

5.5

6.0

6.5

2011 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent of GDP

Present Law Non-Interest Income

Present Law Cost

Present Law Expenditures

Proposal Cost

Proposal Non-Interest Income

Specification for Provisions of the Proposal

(1) Increase the Normal Retirement Age after 2022

 

Under current law, the normal retirement age (NRA) increases to 67 for those attaining 62 in 

2022 and later. Current law contains no further change in program parameters to reflect 

continuing increases in longevity. This provision would continue to increase the NRA at the rate 

of 2 months per year for generations attaining age 62 after 2022, until the NRA reaches 69 for 

those attaining age 62 in 2034. After 2034, the NRA would be increased by 1 month every 2 

years. We expect this ultimate rate of increase to “index” the NRA at a rate sufficient to maintain 

a constant ratio of (a) expected retirement years (life expectancy at NRA) to (b) potential 

working years (NRA-20) at the level for 2034. This approach would offset the effect of 

increasing old-age life expectancy on the cost of the OASDI program relative to the payroll tax 

base. 

Under this provision, the earliest eligibility age for retired worker benefits would remain 

unchanged at 62. Therefore, as the NRA increases beyond 67, additional early retirement 

reduction factors would be applied to provide an actuarially fair reduction for starting benefits 

more than 5 years before attaining NRA. Disabled worker benefits would continue to be payable 

from the Disability Insurance Trust Fund at 100 percent of the worker’s PIA until conversion to 

retired worker status at NRA.
6

Currently, delayed retirement credits (DRC) are earned by workers who are (1) older than their 

NRA and (2) eligible for retired worker benefits but do not receive their eligible benefit amount 

either because they have not filed for benefits or because their benefit has been voluntarily 

suspended. DRCs may be earned for months after attaining NRA up to age 70. Under this 

provision, retired-worker benefit-eligible individuals who attain age 62 after 2022 and have a 

NRA greater than 67 would earn DRCs during the first 36 months after they attain their NRA.

This provision alone is estimated to reduce the long-range OASDI actuarial deficit by 0.98 

percent of taxable payroll and to reduce the annual deficit for the 75th projection year (2085) by 

2.30 percent of payroll.

(2) Base the COLA on a Chain-Weighted CPI

The OASDI automatic cost of living adjustment (COLA) that applies for benefit increases after 

the year of initial benefit eligibility is currently based on the increase in the Consumer Price 

Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W). The CPI-W was the only CPI 

series produced by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) when the COLA was enacted into law in 

1972. The CPI-W computes price increases for a broad market basket of goods and services from 

month to month, with revisions to the weights in the market basket every two years. Thus, 

monthly increases in the CPI-W represent a pure measure of increase in price levels without 

reflecting the effects of shifts that tend to occur across broad strata of different classes of goods 

and services, when their price levels rise at different rates. Historical data show that for all 

consumers in the economy in aggregate, the relative quantity of goods and services tends to 

increase for strata where prices have risen less, and relative quantity tends to decrease for strata 

where prices have risen more. 

The BLS has developed a chain-weighted formula to estimate the effects of the changes in the 

distribution of consumer purchases in real time, and to reflect this phenomenon in lower overall 

increases in the price level for the variable market basket. BLS introduced this formula for the 

Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) in 2000, and this alternative chainweighted version has lowered measured price increases by about 0.3 percentage point per year 

on average. 

This provision would apply a chain-weighted approach for the CPI-W in computing the COLA 

for December 2015 and later. We estimate that this change would reduce the size of future 

COLAs by 0.3 percentage point on average. This provision alone is estimated to reduce the longrange OASDI actuarial deficit by 0.49 percent of taxable payroll and to reduce the annual deficit 

for the 75th projection year (2085) by 0.71 percent of payroll. 

(3) Modify the PIA Formula

 

Under current law, the primary insurance amount (PIA) formula provides a basic monthly benefit 

that equals:

• 90 percent of the average indexed monthly earnings (AIME) up to the first bend point 

(BP1= $749 for workers newly eligible in 2011), 

• 32 percent of AIME between the first bend point and the second bend point (BP2 = 

$4,517 for workers newly eligible in 2011), and 

• 15 percent of AIME above the second bend point. 
7

This provision would introduce a new bend point at the 50th percentile level of AIME for newly 

eligible beneficiaries, starting in 2016. (The new bend point would be 61.5 percent of the way up 

from BP1 to BP2, or at a level equivalent to about $3,066 for workers newly eligible in 2011). 

The PIA factors applicable below the new bend point would be unchanged. The PIA factors 

above the new bend point would be reduced in 2016 by the percent necessary to increase the PIA 

from 2015 to 2016, for workers attaining 62 in these years with steady earnings at the Social 

Security taxable maximum amount for all years after age 22, equal to the increase in the CPI-W. 

Similar reductions would be applied for beneficiaries newly eligible in 2017 through 2055. 

Thereafter, the PIA factors would remain fixed for individuals becoming eligible in later years. 

This “progressive indexing” replaces the current benefit increases, which are at the rate of the 

average wage across generations of workers with similar earnings histories, with:

• Increases at the rate of prices for the highest earners (those with earnings equal to the 

taxable maximum), and

• Increases between the rate of increase in prices and in average wage for earners between 

the 50th percentile of career-average earners and the highest earners.

Benefit increases continue at the rate of increase in the average wage for earners with careeraverage earnings below the 50th percentile. 

This provision alone is estimated to reduce the long-range OASDI actuarial deficit by 0.92 

percent of taxable payroll and to reduce the annual deficit for the 75th projection year (2085) by 

2.14 percent of payroll.

(4) Increase Benefit Computation Years

This provision would increase the number of benefit computation years for retirees from 35 to 

40, adding one additional computation year for those becoming newly eligible for benefits in 

2012, 2014, 2016, 2018, and 2020. For survivors of workers dying before age 62, this provision 

would reduce the number of dropout years from five to zero, from 2012 to 2020. Disabled 

worker benefits would be unaffected by this provision. This provision alone is estimated to 

reduce the long-range OASDI actuarial deficit by 0.47 percent of taxable payroll and to reduce 

the annual deficit for the 75th projection year (2085) by 0.72 percent of payroll.

(5) Enhance the Special Minimum Benefit for Long-Career Low Earners

The present-law special minimum benefit has little effect currently because the level of benefit 

provided has been indexed from one generation of new beneficiaries to the next by increases in 

the CPI. This provision establishes a new minimum PIA beginning with newly eligible 

beneficiaries in 2012. For individuals newly eligible in 2012, the full minimum PIA would equal 

the Health and Human Services (HHS) poverty level for 2011 ($908), multiplied by the increase 

in the CPI for the year 2011 (increase from the third calendar quarter of 2010 to the third quarter 

of 2011). The $908 level equals the 2011 poverty guideline for a family of one, which the 

Department of Health and Human Services publishes annually. For those newly eligible after 

2012, this full minimum PIA level further rises by the increase in the average wage (AWI). 

This provision defines a creditable year as a year in which earnings were sufficient to earn 4 

quarters of coverage. In addition, this provision allows up to 5 creditable years when caring for a 

child under the age of 6, if not otherwise counted as a creditable year. No minimum PIA applies 

for workers with 10 or fewer coverage years. The level of the minimum PIA scales linearly 

between 10 and 30 coverage years, with 100 percent of the full minimum PIA available for those 
8

with 30 or more creditable years. The required number of creditable years and the maximum 

number of child-care years would be scaled (lowered based on years from ages 22 to 61 alive 

and not disabled) for workers becoming disabled or dying before attaining age 62. 

This provision alone is estimated to increase the long-range OASDI actuarial deficit by 0.11 

percent of taxable payroll and to increase the annual deficit for the 75th projection year (2085) by 

0.17 percent of payroll.

(6) Increase Benefits by 5 Percent at Age 85 

This provision would provide for a 5-percent increase in the monthly benefit level for all OASDI 

beneficiaries who have attained age 85 and are eligible for a benefit in 2012 or later. This 

provision alone is estimated to increase the long-range OASDI actuarial deficit by 0.10 percent 

of taxable payroll and to increase the annual deficit for the 75th projection year (2085) by 0.14 

percent of payroll.

(7) Reduce OASDI Benefit by up to 50 Percent for High Total Income

Under this provision, benefits for eligibility in 2019 or later would be subject to a reduction 

based on the level of income in their recent income tax return. For this purpose, income would be 

equal to modified adjusted gross income (MAGI), where MAGI equals (1) adjusted gross income 

(AGI) less (2) any taxable OASDI benefit plus (3) any non-taxable interest income. In 

computing the reduction for benefits payable for any year, MAGI based on the income tax return 

from the second prior year would be used, or from the third prior year if the more recent return is 

not yet completed. 

For benefits for 2019, no benefit reduction would be imposed if MAGI is below $60,000 and the 

beneficiary had filed a single return (or head of household), or is below $120,000 if the 

beneficiary had filed a joint return. Married couples who filed separately would be required to 

combine their MAGIs and would be treated as if they had filed a joint return. For 2019, benefits 

would be reduced by 50 percent for beneficiaries with MAGI equal $180,000 or higher (single 

filer) or $360,000 or higher (joint filer). The percentage reduction for MAGI between the lower 

and upper thresholds would scale linearly. For benefits for years after 2019, the thresholds would 

be indexed from 2019 levels using the average wage index (AWI). 

This provision alone is estimated to reduce the long-range OASDI actuarial deficit by 0.24 

percent of taxable payroll and to reduce the annual deficit for the 75th projection year (2085) by 

0.36 percent of payroll. 

 

(8) Default Personal Savings Accounts

Under this provision, all workers with OASDI taxable earnings would be encouraged to have 2 

percent of their taxable earnings directed to a personal savings account, over and above the 

payroll taxes due to the Social Security program. Participation in the account would occur on a 

default basis for all workers unless they exercised an option to disenroll. For those participating 

in the plan, a number of broad index funds would be available similar to the approach provided 

under the Thrift Savings Plan for Federal employees. The default investment option would be a 

life-cycle fund. Timing for the start of the plan and detailed specifications are not yet settled. 

However, we anticipate no direct effects on the OASDI financial status from the existence of or 
9

participation in this plan. This provision alone is estimated to have a negligible effect on the 

long-range OASDI actuarial deficit and on the annual deficit for the 75th projection year (2085).

 

Detailed Financial Results for the Provisions of the Proposal 

Summary Results by Provision

Table A provides estimates of the effects on the OASDI long-range actuarial balance for each of 

the eight provisions of the proposal separately and on a combined basis. Summary estimates are 

also provided for the effect on the annual balance (the difference between income rate and the 

cost rate, expressed as a percent of present-law taxable payroll) for the 75th projection year, 

2085. 

Benefit Illustrations

Tables B1 and B2 provide illustrative examples of the projected change in benefit levels under 

the seven basic Social Security provisions for beneficiaries retiring at age 65 in future years at 

various earnings levels, with selected numbers of years of work. Table B1 compares the initial 

benefit levels under the basic provisions of the proposal to both scheduled and payable presentlaw benefit levels. 

Table B2 compares the change in benefit levels at ages 65, 75, 85, and 95 to scheduled benefits 

under present law. Table B2 shows that projected benefits under the basic Social Security 

provisions tend to decline in relation to present-law scheduled benefits between ages 65 and 75, 

and also between ages 85 and 95, because of the provision to use the chain-weighted CPI-W for 

calculating the COLA. Between ages 75 and 85, the benefit under the basic provisions grows 

faster than the current law benefit for scaled medium and lower earners, because the increase for 

benefits at age 85 is more than the reduction in the COLA between these ages. 

The benefit illustrations do not reflect reductions for MAGI above specified thresholds starting 

in 2019. Because total income (MAGI) is not directly linked to benefit level, we cannot 

generalize about the effect of this provision on benefits at different levels. For example, a worker 

with a very low career-average earnings level might still have a high MAGI in retirement based 

on inherited wealth or because their spouse had higher earnings. We estimate that roughly 

between 10 and 12 percent of all beneficiaries would have some reduction as a result of this 

provision. In general, higher career-average earnings tend to be associated with higher MAGI, 

but the linkage is not direct.

The hypothetical workers represented in these tables reflect average career earnings patterns of 

workers who started receiving retirement benefits under the Social Security program in recent 

years. The tables subdivide workers with very low and low career-average earnings levels by 

their numbers of years of non-zero earnings. Those with relatively few years of earnings receive 

less benefit from the special minimum benefit provision. However, some of these individuals 

may be dually eligible for higher spouse benefits or for higher widow benefits at some point in 

the future.
10

Trust Fund Operations

Table 1 shows the annual cost and income rates, annual balances, and trust fund ratios (assets as 

percent of annual program cost) for OASDI assuming enactment of the basic Social Security

provisions of the proposal. This table also shows the change from present law in these cost rates, 

income rates, and balances. Included at the bottom of this table are summarized rates for the 75-

year (long-range) period. 

Table 1 indicates that the OASDI program is projected to be solvent throughout the 75-year 

projection period assuming enactment of the basic provisions. After 2048, the trust fund ratio is 

projected to rise steadily, reaching 298 percent of the next year’s annual program cost at the end 

of the 75-year projection period. The actuarial deficit for the OASDI program over the 75-year 

projection period would be eliminated and replaced by a positive actuarial balance estimated at 

0.21 percent of taxable payroll.

We project annual balances to be small positive amounts starting in 2051 and lasting through 

2085, such that non-interest program income exceeds program cost. 

Program Transfers and Assets

Column 4 of Table 1a provides a projection of the asset level for the combined OASI and DI 

Trust Funds under the basic Social Security provisions of the proposal, expressed in present 

value dollars discounted to January 1, 2011. The table indicates that the basic provisions include 

no new specified transfers of general revenue to the trust funds. For purpose of comparison, the 

net OASDI Trust Fund assets, expressed in present value dollars, are also shown for a theoretical

Social Security program where borrowing authority is assumed for the trust funds. Under current 

law, no such borrowing authority exists. Gross Domestic Product (GDP), expressed in present 

value dollars, is shown in column 6 for comparison with other values in the table. 

Effect of the Basic Social Security Provisions on the Federal Budget

Table 1b shows the projected effect, in present value discounted dollars, on the Federal budget 

(unified-budget and on-budget) cash flows and balances, assuming enactment of the basic Social 

Security provisions of this proposal. Table 1b.n provides the estimated nominal dollar effect of 

enactment of the seven basic provisions of the proposal on the annual budget balances for years 

2011 through 2021. All values in these tables represent the amount of the change from the level 

that would be projected under current law due to enactment of the specified provisions. 

The effect of the seven basic Social Security provisions on unified budget cash flow (column 3) 

is expected to be negative for years 2012 through 2016, due to the benefit increase for those who 

receive an increase under the special minimum benefit provision. The remaining specified 

provisions of the proposal rapidly result in substantial positive net changes in unified budget cash 

flow after 2016. 

Column 4 of Table 1b indicates that the projected effect of implementing the basic Social 

Security provisions is a reduction, starting in 2019, on the Federal debt held by the public. 

Column 5 provides the projected effect of the basic Social Security provisions on the annual 

unified budget balances, including both the cash flow effect in column 3 and the additional 

interest on the accumulated debt indicated in column 4. Columns 6 and 7 indicate that the basic 
11

Social Security provisions of this proposal would have no expected direct effects on the onbudget cash flow, or on the total Federal debt, in the future.

It is important to note that these estimates are based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2011 

Trustees Report and thus are not consistent with estimates made by the OMB or the CBO based 

on their assumptions. 

Annual Trust Fund Operations as a Percent of GDP

Table 1c provides annual cost, annual expenditures (on a payable basis), and annual tax income 

for the OASDI program expressed as a percentage of GDP. These values are shown for both 

present law and assuming enactment of the basic Social Security provisions. Showing the annual 

trust fund flows as a percent of GDP provides an additional perspective on these trust fund 

operations in relation to the total value of goods and services produced in the United States. The 

relationship between income and cost is similar when expressed as a percent of GDP to that 

when expressed as a percent of taxable payroll (see Table 1).

Effects on Trust Fund Assets and Unfunded Obligations

Table 1d provides estimates of the changes due to enactment of the basic Social Security 

provisions in the level of projected trust fund assets under present law and, for years after trust 

fund exhaustion under present law, the level of unfunded obligations. All values in the table are 

expressed in present-value discounted dollars. For the 75-year (long-range) period as a whole, 

the present-law unfunded obligation of $6.5 trillion in present value is replaced with a positive 

trust fund balance of $1.0 trillion in present value. This $7.5 trillion change is the combination of 

the following: 

• A $0.4 trillion reduction in revenue (column 2, primarily from reduced taxation of 

benefits revenues arising from lower aggregate benefit levels), plus

• A $7.9 trillion reduction in cost (column 3).

We hope these estimates will be helpful. Please let me know if we may provide further 

assistance.

Sincerely,

Stephen C. Goss

Chief Actuary

Enclosures 
Table A--Estimated Long-Range OASDI Financial Effects of the 

Proposal from Representative Jason Chaffetz 

Provision

Estimated Change in

Long-Range OASDI 

Actuarial Balance 1

(as a percent of payroll)

Estimated Change 

in Annual Balance 

in 75th year 2

(as a percent of payroll)

1) After the normal retirement age (NRA) reaches 67 for those 

attaining age 62 in 2022, increase the NRA 2 months per year until 

it reaches age 69 for individuals attaining age 62 in 2034. Then, 

increase the NRA 1 month every 2 years thereafter. Allow retired 

workers reaching 62 in 2022 and later to earn delayed retirement 

credits during the first 36 months after attaining NRA. Retain the 

current-law earliest eligibility age (EEA) at 62 ................................... 0.98 2.30

2) Starting with the December 2015 cost-of-living adjustment 

(COLA), compute the COLA using a chain-weighted version of 

the consumer price index for urban wage earners and clerical

workers (C-CPI-W). This new computation is estimated to result 

in an annual COLA that is 0.3 percentage point less, on average ....... 0.49 0.71

3) Establish progressive price indexing of PIA formula factors 

beginning with retired workers newly eligible for benefits in 2016 

and stopping with retired workers newly eligible for benefits in 

2055. Create a new bend point at the 50th percentile of careeraverage earnings. Maintain current-law benefits for earners at the 

50th percentile and below and reduce the formula factors (32% and 

15%) that apply above the new bend point such that the PIA for 

steady maximum workers grows across generations by with the 

CPI-W rather than by the growth in the average wage. Disability 

(DI) benefits are not affected by the proposal. However, disabled 

worker beneficiaries, upon attaining normal retirement age, are

subject to a proportional reduction based on the worker's nondisabled years at ages 22 through 61 ................................................... 0.92 2.14

4) Increase the number of benefit computation years for retirees 

and survivors (but not for disabled workers), adding one additional 

computation year for those becoming eligible in 2012, 2014, 2016, 

2018, and 2020 .................................................................................... 0.47 0.72

5) Replace the PIA with a special minimum amount, if higher, for 

workers who have at least 30 creditable years (earnings equal to at 

least 4 quarters of coverage). Phase in the percentage of this 

amount linearly, from 0% of the amount for those with 10 or fewer 

creditable years to 100% for those with 30 or more creditable years. 

Allow up to 5 years when caring for a child under the age of 6 to be 

creditable, if not otherwise counted as a creditable year. Scale the 

creditable year requirements and number of child-care years for 

disabled workers and workers dying under age 62 based on the 

proportion of years from 22 through 61 alive and not disabled. This 

provision is effective for individuals newly eligible for benefits in 

2012 and later. The special minimum amount for those newly 

eligible in 2012 is the HHS poverty level for 2011, $908 multiplied 

by the CPI increase for 2011. For those newly eligible after 2012, 

this amount is further raised by the increase in the average wage 

(AWI) .................................................................................................. -0.11 -0.17
Table A--Estimated Long-Range OASDI Financial Effects of the 

Proposal from Representative Jason Chaffetz 

Provision

Estimated Change in

Long-Range OASDI 

Actuarial Balance 1

(as a percent of payroll)

Estimated Change 

in Annual Balance 

in 75th year 2

(as a percent of payroll)

6) Provide a 5-percent increase to the benefit level of any 

beneficiary who is 85 or older at the beginning of 2012 or who 

reaches their 85th birthday after the beginning of 2012 ...................... -0.10 -0.14

7) Reduce individual Social Security benefits if modified adjusted 

gross income (AGI less taxable Social Security benefits plus 

nontaxable interest income) is above $60,000 for single taxpayers 

or $120,000 for taxpayers filing jointly. This provision is 

effective for individuals newly eligible for benefits in 2019 or 

later. The percentage reduction increases from 0 percent for 

single/joint filers with MAGI up to $60,000/$120,000, to 50 

percent for single/joint filers with MAGI of $180,000/$360,000 or 

above. The $60,000/$120,000 and $180,000/$360,000 thresholds 

take effect for benefits in 2019, using tax return data from 2017, 

two years prior. For years after 2019, thresholds are indexed to the 

avaeage wage index (AWI) ................................................................. 0.24 0.36

8) Separate personal accounts: Provide for default participation by 

all workers in a personal savings account, with the option to 

disenroll. Contributions equal to 2 percent of OASDI taxable 

earnings would be redirected from employee pay, but would not 

affect the payroll tax rate for the OASDI program. Several index 

funds would be offered, similar to the structure of the Federal Thrift 

Savings Plan, with the default being a “life-cycle” fund. Timing 

and further specifications for these accounts are yet to be 

determined. The personal accounts would have no direct effects on 

OASDI taxes or benefits. ..................................................................... 3 4

Total for all provisions, including interaction .............. 2.43 4.77

1

Under current law, the estimated long-range OASDI actuarial balance is -2.22 percent of taxable payroll. 2

Under current law, the estimated 75th year annual balance is -4.24 percent of taxable payroll. 3

Effect is negligible, that is, a change in the actuarial balance of less than 0.005 percent of taxable payroll. 4

Effect is negligible, that is, a change in the 75th year annual balance of less than 0.005 percent of taxable payroll. 

Notes: All estimates are based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2011 OASDI Trustees Report. 

 Estimates of individual provisions appear on a stand-alone basis relative to current law, unless otherwise stated.

Social Security Administration

Office of the Chief Actuary

November 9, 2011
Year Incremental Incremental

Attain Computation Progressive Increase Reduced Minimum

Age 65 (Wage-Indexed (CPI-Indexed Years4 Price Indexing5 NRA6 COLA7 Benefit8 Total Scheduled Payable

2011 Dollars) 2011 Dollars)

 

2011 662 662 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 100

2030 585 773 -5.2 0.0 -6.4 -0.9 33.5 17.4 117 117

2050 586 978 -5.2 0.0 -16.3 -0.9 33.5 4.9 105 134

2080 586 1,365 -5.2 0.0 -23.1 -0.9 33.5 -3.6 96 128

 

2011 662 662 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 100

2030 585 773 -5.2 0.0 -6.4 -0.9 0.1 -11.9 88 88

2050 586 978 -5.2 0.0 -16.3 -0.9 0.1 -21.3 79 101

2080 586 1,365 -5.2 0.0 -23.1 -0.9 0.1 -27.7 72 96

 

2011 662 662 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 100

2030 585 773 -5.2 0.0 -6.4 -0.9 0.0 -12.0 88 88

2050 586 978 -5.2 0.0 -16.3 -0.9 0.0 -21.4 79 100

2080 586 1,365 -5.2 0.0 -23.1 -0.9 0.0 -27.8 72 96

2011 866 866 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 100

2030 765 1,012 -1.7 0.0 -6.4 -0.9 0.0 -8.8 91 91

2050 766 1,280 -1.7 0.0 -16.3 -0.9 0.0 -18.5 81 104

2080 766 1,786 -1.7 0.0 -23.1 -0.9 0.0 -25.1 75 99

2011 866 866 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 100

2030 765 1,012 -6.6 0.0 -6.4 -0.9 3.6 -10.3 90 90

2050 766 1,280 -6.6 0.0 -16.3 -0.9 3.6 -19.8 80 103

2080 766 1,786 -6.6 0.0 -23.1 -0.9 3.6 -26.3 74 98

2011 866 866 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 100

2030 765 1,012 -6.6 0.0 -6.4 -0.9 0.0 -13.4 87 87

2050 766 1,280 -6.6 0.0 -16.3 -0.9 0.0 -22.6 77 99

2080 766 1,786 -6.6 0.0 -23.1 -0.9 0.0 -28.8 71 95

2011 1,428 1,428 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 100

2030 1,261 1,667 -2.3 -1.8 -6.4 -0.9 0.0 -11.0 89 89

2050 1,263 2,109 -2.3 -3.8 -16.3 -0.9 0.0 -22.1 78 100

2080 1,262 2,943 -2.3 -4.5 -23.1 -0.9 0.0 -28.9 71 94

2011 1,428 1,428 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 100

2030 1,261 1,667 -8.9 0.0 -6.4 -0.9 0.0 -15.5 84 84

2050 1,263 2,109 -8.9 0.0 -16.3 -0.9 0.0 -24.5 76 97

2080 1,262 2,943 -8.9 0.0 -23.1 -0.9 0.0 -30.6 69 92

2011 1,892 1,892 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 100

2030 1,672 2,210 -1.3 -10.7 -6.4 -0.9 0.0 -18.3 82 82

2050 1,673 2,795 -1.3 -22.9 -16.3 -0.9 0.0 -36.9 63 81

2080 1,673 3,900 -1.3 -26.8 -23.1 -0.9 0.0 -45.0 55 73

2011 2,250 2,250 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 100

2030 2,045 2,703 -0.3 -15.8 -6.4 -0.9 0.0 -22.0 78 78

2050 2,043 3,412 -0.1 -33.6 -16.3 -0.9 0.0 -45.0 55 70

2080 2,039 4,754 -0.1 -39.3 -23.1 -0.9 0.0 -53.8 46 61

1 Average of highest 35 years of earnings wage indexed to 2011.

2 Projected percent of new retired worker awards in 2050 closest to AIME levels and years of work.

3 After trust fund exhaustion under present law continuing taxes are expected to be enough to pay about three fourths of scheduled benefits.

4

5

6

7

8

All estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2011 Trustees Report.

Low-AIME ($19,583 for 20111) 20-Year Scaled Earner (2.7% of Retirees2)

Medium-AIME ($43,518 for 20111) 44-Year Scaled Earner (27.0% of Retirees2)

Medium-AIME ($43,518 for 20111) 30-Year Scaled Earner (4.3% of Retirees2)

Some beneficiairies will have benefits reduced further than shown in the illustrations. The maximum reduction would be 50% of what is shown in the tables. This reduction is effective in 2019 and applies 

to those whose MAGI exceeds the thresholds stated in the proposal. We estimate that roughly 10-12 percent of beneficiaries would have some reduction. The percent with a reduction would be higher for 

higher lifetime earners, and lower for lower lifetime earners.

Hold current law hiatus in the NRA, then increase the NRA 2 months per year until it reaches age 69. Therafter, increase the NRA 1 month every 2 years.

Starting Dec 2015, compute the COLA using a chained CPI-W, producing 0.3% lower annual COLAs on average.

Increase the PIA to a level such that a worker with 30/10 years earning at least 4 QCs would receive an adjusted PIA of at least 100%/0% of monthly HHS poverty level in 2011, CPI-index from 2011-2012 then 

wage-indexed to year of eligibility. This provision would take full effect for all newly eligible workers in 2012. Allow up to 5 credible child care years for those with a child under age 6. The Minimum Benefit 

Percent Change is calculated after all other proposals, so that the Proposed Benefit Amount is at least the Minimum Benefit.

(Percents)

Very-Low-AIME ($10,879 for 20111) 30-Year Scaled Earner (8.1% of Retirees2)

Very-Low-AIME ($10,879 for 20111

) 20-Year Scaled Earner (6.2% of Retirees2)

High-AIME ($69,629 for 20111

) 44-Year Scaled Earner (20.5% of Retirees2)

Office of the Chief Actuary, Social Security Administration November 9, 2011

Maximum-AIME ($106,800 for 20111) Steady Earner (5.6% of Retirees2)

Increase the computation years by one year in the following years: 2012, 2014, 2016, 2018, 2020.

Progressive Price Indexing starting for those newly eligible in 2016, holding harmless the lowest 50% of career-average earners. Reductions for indexing would continue through 2055, ant then stay fixed. The 

Progressive Price Indexing Percent Change is calculated after the Computation Year proposal.

Low-AIME ($19,583 for 20111

) 30-Year Scaled Earner (6.9% of Retirees2)

Very-Low-AIME ($10,879 for 20111

) 14-Year Scaled Earner (5.2% of Retirees2)

Low-AIME ($19,583 for 20111

) 44-Year Scaled Earner (13.4% of Retirees2)

Table B1. Changes in Benefits for Hypothetical Workers Beginning Benefit Receipt at age 65 

Chaffetz Proposal: Basic Social Security Provisions (except for reduction based on total income, see note below)

Scheduled Benefit Level Percent Change at age 65

Present Law Scheduled Proposal Scheduled Benefit

Monthly Benefits3 Percent of Present Law:

(Percent change)
Year 

Attain

Age 65 Age 65 Age 75 Age 853 Age 953

2011 100.0 98.3 100.2 97.3

2030 117.4 114.0 116.3 112.9

2050 104.9 101.9 103.9 100.9

2080 96.4 93.6 95.5 92.7

2011 100.0 98.3 100.2 97.3

2030 88.1 85.5 87.2 84.7

2050 78.7 76.4 77.9 75.7

2080 72.3 70.2 71.6 69.6

2010 100.0 98.3 100.2 97.3

2030 88.0 85.4 87.1 84.6

2050 78.6 76.3 77.9 75.6

2080 72.2 70.2 71.5 69.5

2011 100.0 98.3 100.2 97.3

2030 91.2 88.5 90.3 87.7

2050 81.5 79.1 80.7 78.4

2080 74.9 72.7 74.2 72.0

2011 100.0 98.3 100.2 97.3

2030 89.7 87.2 88.9 86.3

2050 80.2 77.9 79.4 77.1

2080 73.7 71.6 73.0 70.9

2011 100.0 98.3 100.2 97.3

2030 86.6 84.1 85.8 83.3

2050 77.4 75.2 76.7 74.5

2080 71.2 69.1 70.5 68.4

2011 100.0 98.3 100.2 97.3

2030 89.0 86.4 88.1 85.6

2050 77.9 75.6 77.1 74.9

2080 71.1 69.0 70.4 68.4

2011 100.0 98.3 100.2 97.3

2030 84.5 82.1 83.7 81.3

2050 75.5 73.3 74.8 72.6

2080 69.4 67.4 68.7 66.7

2011 100.0 98.3 100.2 97.3

2030 81.7 79.4 80.9 78.6

2050 63.1 61.3 62.5 60.7

2080 55.0 53.5 54.5 52.9

2011 100.0 98.3 100.2 97.3

2030 78.0 75.7 77.2 75.0

2050 55.0 53.4 54.5 52.9

2080 46.2 44.9 45.8 44.5

1 Average of highest 35 years of earnings wage indexed to 2011.

2 Projected percent of new retired worker awards in 2050 closest to AIME levels and years of work.

3 Increase the benefit by 5% for those 85 and older starting in 2012.

Note: Starting Dec 2015, compute the COLA using a chained CPI-W, producing 0.3% lower annual COLAs on average.

Other Changes: 

-

All estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2011 Trustees Report.

Some beneficiairies will have benefits reduced further than shown in the illustrations. The maximum reduction would be 50% of what is shown in the tables. This reduction is 

effective in 2019 and applies to those whose MAGI exceeds the thresholds stated in the proposal. We estimate that roughly 10-12 percent of beneficiaries would have some 

reduction. The percent with a reduction would be higher for higher lifetime earners, and lower for lower lifetime earners.

Office of the Chief Actuary, Social Security Administration November 9, 2011

High-AIME ($69,629 for 20111) 44-Year Scaled Earner (20.5% of Retirees2)

Maximum-AIME ($106,800 for 20111

) Steady Earner (5.6% of Retirees2)

See Table B1 for other changes in benefits.

Table B2. Changes in Benefits for Hypothetical Workers Beginning Benefit Receipt at age 65 

Chaffetz Proposal: Basic Social Security Provisions (except for reduction based on total income, see note below)

Proposal Benefit as Percent of Present Law Scheduled

(Percents)

Very-Low-AIME ($10,879 for 20111) 30-Year Scaled Earner (8.1% of Retirees2)

Very-Low-AIME ($10,879 for 20111

) 20-Year Scaled Earner (6.2% of Retirees2)

Very-Low-AIME ($10,879 for 20111

) 14-Year Scaled Earner (5.2% of Retirees2

)

Low-AIME ($19,583 for 20111

) 44-Year Scaled Earner (13.4% of Retirees2)

Medium-AIME ($43,518 for 20111

) 44-Year Scaled Earner (27.0% of Retirees2)

Medium-AIME ($43,518 for 20111

) 30-Year Scaled Earner (4.3% of Retirees2)

Low-AIME ($19,583 for 20111) 30-Year Scaled Earner (6.9% of Retirees2)

Low-AIME ($19,583 for 20111) 20-Year Scaled Earner (2.7% of Retirees2)
Year Cost Rate

Income

Rate

Annual

Balance Cost Rate

Income

Rate

Annual

Balance

2011 13.35 12.52 -0.82 353 0.00 0.00 0.00

2012 13.25 12.87 -0.39 346 0.02 0.00 -0.02

2013 13.23 12.87 -0.36 339 0.05 0.00 -0.05

2014 13.23 12.92 -0.31 332 0.05 0.00 -0.05

2015 13.29 12.94 -0.35 326 0.05 0.00 -0.05

2016 13.33 12.97 -0.36 320 0.01 0.00 -0.01

2017 13.42 13.00 -0.42 314 -0.04 0.00 0.04

2018 13.52 13.02 -0.50 307 -0.09 -0.01 0.09

2019 13.72 13.03 -0.69 299 -0.16 -0.01 0.15

2020 13.96 13.05 -0.92 290 -0.23 -0.01 0.22

2021 14.21 13.06 -1.14 280 -0.31 -0.02 0.30

2022 14.42 13.08 -1.35 270 -0.41 -0.02 0.38

2023 14.59 13.09 -1.50 261 -0.54 -0.03 0.51

2024 14.71 13.10 -1.61 251 -0.70 -0.04 0.66

2025 14.84 13.11 -1.74 241 -0.83 -0.04 0.79

2026 14.95 13.11 -1.84 231 -0.97 -0.05 0.92

2027 15.03 13.12 -1.91 221 -1.11 -0.06 1.06

2028 15.09 13.13 -1.97 211 -1.25 -0.06 1.19

2029 15.13 13.13 -2.00 200 -1.38 -0.07 1.32

2030 15.15 13.14 -2.01 190 -1.51 -0.07 1.44

2031 15.10 13.14 -1.96 179 -1.66 -0.08 1.58

2032 15.04 13.14 -1.90 169 -1.81 -0.09 1.72

2033 14.97 13.14 -1.84 160 -1.95 -0.10 1.86

2034 14.89 13.14 -1.75 151 -2.09 -0.10 1.99

2035 14.79 13.13 -1.65 142 -2.22 -0.11 2.12

2036 14.68 13.13 -1.55 134 -2.35 -0.11 2.24

2037 14.57 13.13 -1.44 126 -2.47 -0.12 2.35

2038 14.44 13.12 -1.32 119 -2.58 -0.13 2.46

2039 14.31 13.12 -1.19 112 -2.68 -0.13 2.55

2040 14.17 13.11 -1.06 106 -2.78 -0.14 2.64

2041 14.05 13.11 -0.94 101 -2.87 -0.14 2.73

2042 13.92 13.10 -0.82 97 -2.95 -0.15 2.80

2043 13.81 13.10 -0.71 93 -3.03 -0.15 2.88

2044 13.70 13.09 -0.61 90 -3.11 -0.15 2.96

2045 13.60 13.09 -0.51 87 -3.19 -0.16 3.03

2046 13.49 13.08 -0.41 85 -3.27 -0.16 3.10

2047 13.40 13.08 -0.32 84 -3.34 -0.17 3.18

2048 13.30 13.07 -0.23 84 -3.42 -0.17 3.25

2049 13.21 13.07 -0.14 84 -3.49 -0.17 3.32

2050 13.12 13.07 -0.06 84 -3.56 -0.18 3.39

2051 13.05 13.06 0.02 86 -3.63 -0.18 3.45

2052 12.98 13.06 0.08 88 -3.70 -0.18 3.52

2053 12.91 13.06 0.14 90 -3.78 -0.19 3.59

2054 12.86 13.06 0.20 93 -3.85 -0.19 3.65

2055 12.80 13.05 0.25 96 -3.91 -0.20 3.72

2056 12.75 13.05 0.30 100 -3.99 -0.20 3.79

2057 12.71 13.05 0.34 104 -4.05 -0.20 3.85

2058 12.67 13.05 0.38 108 -4.11 -0.21 3.91

2059 12.63 13.05 0.42 113 -4.17 -0.21 3.96

2060 12.59 13.05 0.46 118 -4.21 -0.21 4.00

2061 12.56 13.04 0.49 124 -4.26 -0.22 4.04

2062 12.53 13.04 0.51 130 -4.30 -0.22 4.08

2063 12.51 13.04 0.53 136 -4.33 -0.22 4.11

2064 12.49 13.04 0.55 142 -4.36 -0.22 4.14

2065 12.48 13.04 0.56 148 -4.38 -0.22 4.16

2066 12.49 13.04 0.55 155 -4.40 -0.22 4.18

2067 12.49 13.04 0.55 161 -4.42 -0.22 4.20

2068 12.50 13.04 0.55 168 -4.44 -0.23 4.22

2069 12.50 13.05 0.54 174 -4.47 -0.23 4.24

2070 12.50 13.05 0.54 181 -4.50 -0.23 4.27

2071 12.50 13.05 0.55 188 -4.54 -0.23 4.31

2072 12.50 13.05 0.55 194 -4.57 -0.23 4.34

2073 12.50 13.05 0.55 201 -4.60 -0.23 4.37

2074 12.51 13.05 0.54 208 -4.64 -0.23 4.40

2075 12.51 13.05 0.54 215 -4.67 -0.24 4.43

2076 12.52 13.05 0.53 222 -4.69 -0.24 4.45

2077 12.53 13.05 0.52 229 -4.72 -0.24 4.48

2078 12.54 13.05 0.52 236 -4.75 -0.24 4.51

2079 12.54 13.05 0.52 244 -4.78 -0.24 4.54

2080 12.54 13.06 0.52 251 -4.82 -0.24 4.58

2081 12.54 13.06 0.51 258 -4.85 -0.24 4.61

2082 12.55 13.06 0.51 266 -4.89 -0.25 4.65

2083 12.54 13.06 0.51 273 -4.93 -0.25 4.69

2084 12.54 13.06 0.52 281 -4.98 -0.25 4.73

2085 12.53 13.06 0.52 289 -5.02 -0.25 4.77

2086 12.51 13.06 0.54 298 -5.08 -0.25 4.82

Cost Rate Income Rate

Actuarial 

Balance

Change in 

Cost rate

Change in 

Income Rate

Change in 

Actuarial

Balance

13.69% 13.90% 0.21% N/A -2.56% -0.13% 2.43%

1 Under present law the year of exhaustion is 2036

Year of 

Exhaustion1

Summarized Rates: OASDI

Based on Intermediate Assumptions of the 2011 Trustees Report

November 9, 2011

Summarized Rates: OASDI

2011 - 2085

Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

Table 1 - OASDI Cost Rate, Income Rate, Annual Balance, and Trust Fund Ratio

Proposal

Expressed as a percentage of present-law

taxable payroll Trust Fund

Ratio

1-1-year

Expressed as a percentage of present-law

taxable payroll

Change in Present Law

Representative Chaffetz Proposal: Basic Social Security Provisions
Percentage

of Payroll

Annual

Amounts

Accumulated as of 

End of Year

Gross Domestic 

Product

Without General

Fund Transfers

With Plan General

Fund Transfers

(1) (2) (3) (5) (6) (7) (8)

2011 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,564.6 14,904.1 2,564.6 2,564.6

2012 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,543.8 14,951.5 2,545.0 2,545.0

2013 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,524.3 15,099.9 2,527.9 2,527.9

2014 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,507.1 15,251.0 2,513.4 2,513.4

2015 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,487.7 15,351.9 2,496.7 2,496.7

2016 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,467.6 15,378.4 2,476.9 2,476.9

2017 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,444.0 15,366.5 2,451.1 2,451.1

2018 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,415.9 15,366.9 2,417.9 2,417.9

2019 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,377.0 15,345.6 2,370.3 2,370.3

2020 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,325.1 15,301.1 2,305.9 2,305.9

2021 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,260.7 15,242.3 2,224.7 2,224.7

2022 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,185.4 15,159.1 2,127.6 2,127.6

2023 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,102.2 15,052.7 2,015.9 2,015.9

2024 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,013.6 14,924.4 1,890.9 1,890.9

2025 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,919.5 14,765.8 1,753.6 1,753.6

2026 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,821.0 14,596.0 1,605.5 1,605.5

2027 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,719.9 14,436.0 1,448.1 1,448.1

2028 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,617.3 14,276.4 1,282.9 1,282.9

2029 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,514.3 14,114.5 1,111.6 1,111.6

2030 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,412.1 13,958.1 935.7 935.7

2031 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,313.6 13,813.5 757.0 757.0

2032 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,219.1 13,670.9 576.1 576.1

2033 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,128.9 13,528.0 393.8 393.8

2034 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,043.8 13,387.2 211.4 211.4

2035 0.0 0.0 0.0 964.5 13,245.5 29.8 29.8

2036 0.0 0.0 0.0 891.2 13,107.1 -150.6 -150.6

2037 0.0 0.0 0.0 823.8 12,971.3 -329.1 -329.1

2038 0.0 0.0 0.0 763.0 12,843.4 -504.7 -504.7

2039 0.0 0.0 0.0 708.8 12,714.4 -676.9 -676.9

2040 0.0 0.0 0.0 661.0 12,582.3 -845.5 -845.5

2041 0.0 0.0 0.0 619.3 12,453.7 -1,010.4 -1,010.4

2042 0.0 0.0 0.0 583.2 12,326.2 -1,171.6 -1,171.6

2043 0.0 0.0 0.0 552.4 12,197.5 -1,329.5 -1,329.5

2044 0.0 0.0 0.0 526.4 12,069.4 -1,484.4 -1,484.4

2045 0.0 0.0 0.0 505.1 11,941.2 -1,636.3 -1,636.3

2046 0.0 0.0 0.0 488.3 11,813.2 -1,785.2 -1,785.2

2047 0.0 0.0 0.0 475.6 11,684.0 -1,931.5 -1,931.5

2048 0.0 0.0 0.0 466.8 11,555.8 -2,075.1 -2,075.1

2049 0.0 0.0 0.0 461.7 11,428.4 -2,216.1 -2,216.1

2050 0.0 0.0 0.0 460.0 11,301.9 -2,354.8 -2,354.8

2051 0.0 0.0 0.0 461.4 11,175.5 -2,491.4 -2,491.4

2052 0.0 0.0 0.0 465.3 11,049.7 -2,626.4 -2,626.4

2053 0.0 0.0 0.0 471.6 10,924.7 -2,759.9 -2,759.9

2054 0.0 0.0 0.0 479.9 10,800.1 -2,892.1 -2,892.1

2055 0.0 0.0 0.0 490.0 10,677.6 -3,023.3 -3,023.3

2056 0.0 0.0 0.0 501.7 10,555.1 -3,153.5 -3,153.5

2057 0.0 0.0 0.0 515.0 10,434.5 -3,282.7 -3,282.7

2058 0.0 0.0 0.0 529.6 10,315.5 -3,410.8 -3,410.8

2059 0.0 0.0 0.0 545.3 10,198.7 -3,537.8 -3,537.8

2060 0.0 0.0 0.0 562.1 10,084.5 -3,663.4 -3,663.4

2061 0.0 0.0 0.0 579.9 9,971.5 -3,787.8 -3,787.8

2062 0.0 0.0 0.0 598.3 9,860.0 -3,911.0 -3,911.0

2063 0.0 0.0 0.0 617.1 9,750.1 -4,032.9 -4,032.9

2064 0.0 0.0 0.0 636.3 9,640.9 -4,153.8 -4,153.8

2065 0.0 0.0 0.0 655.4 9,532.4 -4,273.6 -4,273.6

2066 0.0 0.0 0.0 674.2 9,425.1 -4,392.6 -4,392.6

2067 0.0 0.0 0.0 692.6 9,319.2 -4,510.8 -4,510.8

2068 0.0 0.0 0.0 710.8 9,214.2 -4,628.3 -4,628.3

2069 0.0 0.0 0.0 728.6 9,109.6 -4,745.1 -4,745.1

2070 0.0 0.0 0.0 746.1 9,005.9 -4,861.5 -4,861.5

2071 0.0 0.0 0.0 763.6 8,903.0 -4,977.2 -4,977.2

2072 0.0 0.0 0.0 780.9 8,801.0 -5,092.4 -5,092.4

2073 0.0 0.0 0.0 797.9 8,699.7 -5,207.2 -5,207.2

2074 0.0 0.0 0.0 814.5 8,599.7 -5,321.6 -5,321.6

2075 0.0 0.0 0.0 830.8 8,500.5 -5,435.5 -5,435.5

2076 0.0 0.0 0.0 846.6 8,402.2 -5,548.9 -5,548.9

2077 0.0 0.0 0.0 862.0 8,304.6 -5,661.8 -5,661.8

2078 0.0 0.0 0.0 877.1 8,207.6 -5,774.2 -5,774.2

2079 0.0 0.0 0.0 891.9 8,111.3 -5,886.2 -5,886.2

2080 0.0 0.0 0.0 906.6 8,015.9 -5,997.7 -5,997.7

2081 0.0 0.0 0.0 920.9 7,921.4 -6,108.7 -6,108.7

2082 0.0 0.0 0.0 935.1 7,827.9 -6,219.3 -6,219.3

2083 0.0 0.0 0.0 949.2 7,734.9 -6,329.5 -6,329.5

2084 0.0 0.0 0.0 963.1 7,642.9 -6,439.2 -6,439.2

2085 0.0 0.0 0.0 977.1 7,552.1 -6,548.4 -6,548.4

Total 2011-2085 0.0

Based on the Intermediate Assumptions of the 2011 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Ultimate Real Trust Fund Yield of 2.9% Social Security Administration

November 9, 2011

Table 1a - General Fund Transfers, OASDI Trust Fund Assets, and Theoretical OASDI Assets

Calendar

Year

Proposal General Fund Transfers Present Value in Billions as of 1-1-2011

Proposal

Total OASDI

Trust Fund

Assets 

at End of Year

Theoretical Social Security1

with Borrowing Authority

Present Value in Billions as of 1-1- 2011

Representative Chaffetz Proposal: Basic Social Security Provisions

Net OASDI Trust Fund Assets at End of Year

1

 Theoretical Social Security is the current Social Security program with the assumption

 that the law is modified to permit borrowing from the General Fund of the Treasury.
Year

Specified 

General Fund 

Transfers

Basic Changes

in OASDI

Cash Flow

Change

in Annual

Unified Budget

Cash Flow

Change in

Debt Held

by Public at

End of Year

Change

in Annual

Unified Budget

Balance

Change

in Total

Federal Debt

End Of Year

Change

in Annual

On Budget

Balance

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)

2011 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

2012 0.0 -1.1 -1.1 1.1 -1.1 0.0 0.0

2013 0.0 -2.6 -2.6 3.7 -2.6 0.0 0.0

2014 0.0 -2.6 -2.6 6.3 -2.8 0.0 0.0

2015 0.0 -2.6 -2.6 9.0 -2.9 0.0 0.0

2016 0.0 -0.3 -0.3 9.3 -0.7 0.0 0.0

2017 0.0 2.2 2.2 7.1 1.8 0.0 0.0

2018 0.0 5.1 5.1 1.9 4.8 0.0 0.0

2019 0.0 8.6 8.6 -6.6 8.5 0.0 0.0

2020 0.0 12.5 12.5 -19.2 12.8 0.0 0.0

2021 0.0 16.9 16.9 -36.0 17.8 0.0 0.0

2022 0.0 21.7 21.7 -57.7 23.5 0.0 0.0

2023 0.0 28.6 28.6 -86.3 31.6 0.0 0.0

2024 0.0 36.5 36.5 -122.8 41.0 0.0 0.0

2025 0.0 43.1 43.1 -165.9 49.8 0.0 0.0

2026 0.0 49.7 49.7 -215.5 58.7 0.0 0.0

2027 0.0 56.3 56.3 -271.8 68.1 0.0 0.0

2028 0.0 62.6 62.6 -334.4 77.4 0.0 0.0

2029 0.0 68.3 68.3 -402.7 86.6 0.0 0.0

2030 0.0 73.7 73.7 -476.4 95.7 0.0 0.0

2031 0.0 80.2 80.2 -556.6 106.3 0.0 0.0

2032 0.0 86.4 86.4 -643.0 116.8 0.0 0.0

2033 0.0 92.1 92.1 -735.1 127.2 0.0 0.0

2034 0.0 97.3 97.3 -832.4 137.5 0.0 0.0

2035 0.0 102.4 102.4 -934.8 147.9 0.0 0.0

2036 0.0 107.0 107.0 -1,041.8 158.1 0.0 0.0

2037 0.0 111.1 111.1 -1,152.9 168.1 0.0 0.0

2038 0.0 114.8 114.8 -1,267.7 177.8 0.0 0.0

2039 0.0 118.0 118.0 -1,385.7 187.3 0.0 0.0

2040 0.0 120.8 120.8 -1,506.5 196.5 0.0 0.0

2041 0.0 123.1 123.1 -1,629.7 205.5 0.0 0.0

2042 0.0 125.2 125.2 -1,754.8 214.2 0.0 0.0

2043 0.0 127.1 127.1 -1,881.9 223.0 0.0 0.0

2044 0.0 128.9 128.9 -2,010.9 231.8 0.0 0.0

2045 0.0 130.6 130.6 -2,141.5 240.5 0.0 0.0

2046 0.0 132.1 132.1 -2,273.6 249.1 0.0 0.0

2047 0.0 133.5 133.5 -2,407.1 257.7 0.0 0.0

2048 0.0 134.8 134.8 -2,541.8 266.3 0.0 0.0

2049 0.0 136.0 136.0 -2,677.8 274.9 0.0 0.0

2050 0.0 137.0 137.0 -2,814.8 283.4 0.0 0.0

2051 0.0 138.0 138.0 -2,952.8 291.8 0.0 0.0

2052 0.0 138.9 138.9 -3,091.7 300.3 0.0 0.0

2053 0.0 139.8 139.8 -3,231.5 308.7 0.0 0.0

2054 0.0 140.5 140.5 -3,372.0 317.1 0.0 0.0

2055 0.0 141.2 141.2 -3,513.2 325.5 0.0 0.0

2056 0.0 142.0 142.0 -3,655.2 334.0 0.0 0.0

2057 0.0 142.5 142.5 -3,797.7 342.2 0.0 0.0

2058 0.0 142.7 142.7 -3,940.4 350.3 0.0 0.0

2059 0.0 142.7 142.7 -4,083.1 358.0 0.0 0.0

2060 0.0 142.5 142.5 -4,225.6 365.6 0.0 0.0

2061 0.0 142.1 142.1 -4,367.7 373.0 0.0 0.0

2062 0.0 141.6 141.6 -4,509.2 380.3 0.0 0.0

2063 0.0 140.8 140.8 -4,650.1 387.3 0.0 0.0

2064 0.0 140.0 140.0 -4,790.0 394.1 0.0 0.0

2065 0.0 139.0 139.0 -4,929.0 400.8 0.0 0.0

2066 0.0 137.8 137.8 -5,066.8 407.1 0.0 0.0

2067 0.0 136.6 136.6 -5,203.4 413.5 0.0 0.0

2068 0.0 135.6 135.6 -5,339.0 420.0 0.0 0.0

2069 0.0 134.7 134.7 -5,473.7 426.5 0.0 0.0

2070 0.0 133.9 133.9 -5,607.6 433.0 0.0 0.0

2071 0.0 133.2 133.2 -5,740.8 439.7 0.0 0.0

2072 0.0 132.5 132.5 -5,873.3 446.3 0.0 0.0

2073 0.0 131.8 131.8 -6,005.1 452.8 0.0 0.0

2074 0.0 131.0 131.0 -6,136.1 459.2 0.0 0.0

2075 0.0 130.2 130.2 -6,266.3 465.5 0.0 0.0

2076 0.0 129.2 129.2 -6,395.5 471.7 0.0 0.0

2077 0.0 128.3 128.3 -6,523.8 477.9 0.0 0.0

2078 0.0 127.5 127.5 -6,651.3 484.1 0.0 0.0

2079 0.0 126.8 126.8 -6,778.1 490.3 0.0 0.0

2080 0.0 126.1 126.1 -6,904.3 496.6 0.0 0.0

2081 0.0 125.4 125.4 -7,029.7 502.7 0.0 0.0

2082 0.0 124.8 124.8 -7,154.4 509.0 0.0 0.0

2083 0.0 124.2 124.2 -7,278.6 515.2 0.0 0.0

2084 0.0 123.7 123.7 -7,402.3 521.5 0.0 0.0

2085 0.0 123.2 123.2 -7,525.5 527.8 0.0 0.0

0.0 7,525.5 7,525.5

Based on Intermediate Assumptions of the 2011 Trustees Report. Office of the Chief Actuary

Ultimate Real Trust Fund Yield of 2.9% Social Security Administration

1

 Effects of tax provisions on the On-Budget are not reflected in this table.

Billions of Present Value Dollars as of 1-1-2011

Table 1b - OASDI Changes & Implications for Federal Budget and Debt of Specified Plan Provision Effects on OASDI1 (Present Value Dollars)

November 9, 2011

Total 2011-85

Representative Chaffetz Proposal: Basic Social Security Provisions
Year

Specified 

General Fund 

Transfers

Basic Changes

in OASDI

Cash Flow

Change

in Annual

Unified Budget

Cash Flow

Change in

Debt Held

by Public at

End of Year

Change

in Annual

Unified Budget

Balance

Change

in Total

Federal Debt

End of Year

Change

in Annual

On Budget

Balance

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)

2011 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

2012 0.0 -1.2 -1.2 1.2 -1.2 0.0 0.0

2013 0.0 -2.8 -2.8 4.2 -3.0 0.0 0.0

2014 0.0 -3.1 -3.1 7.5 -3.3 0.0 0.0

2015 0.0 -3.2 -3.2 11.1 -3.6 0.0 0.0

2016 0.0 -0.4 -0.4 12.0 -0.9 0.0 0.0

2017 0.0 2.9 2.9 9.6 2.5 0.0 0.0

2018 0.0 7.1 7.1 2.7 6.9 0.0 0.0

2019 0.0 12.5 12.5 -9.9 12.6 0.0 0.0

2020 0.0 19.1 19.1 -30.0 20.0 0.0 0.0

2021 0.0 27.0 27.0 -59.1 29.1 0.0 0.0

Based on Intermediate Assumptions of the 2011 Trustees Report. Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

Representative Chaffetz Proposal: Basic Social Security Provisions

1

 Effects of tax provisions on the On-Budget are not reflected in this table.

Billions of Nominal Dollars

Table 1b.n - OASDI Changes & Implications for Federal Budget and Debt of Specified Plan Provision Effects on OASDI1 (Nominal Dollars)

November 9, 2011
Cost

Expenditures

(Payable)

Non-Interest

Income Cost

Expenditures

(Payable)

Non-Interest

Income

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)

2011 4.85 4.85 4.55 4.85 4.85 4.55

2012 4.84 4.84 4.71 4.85 4.85 4.71

2013 4.84 4.84 4.73 4.86 4.86 4.73

2014 4.86 4.86 4.76 4.87 4.87 4.76

2015 4.89 4.89 4.78 4.91 4.91 4.78

2016 4.95 4.95 4.82 4.95 4.95 4.82

2017 5.02 5.02 4.85 5.01 5.01 4.85

2018 5.10 5.10 4.88 5.06 5.06 4.88

2019 5.21 5.21 4.89 5.15 5.15 4.89

2020 5.32 5.32 4.89 5.23 5.23 4.89

2021 5.43 5.43 4.89 5.31 5.31 4.88

2022 5.53 5.53 4.88 5.38 5.38 4.88

2023 5.63 5.63 4.88 5.43 5.43 4.87

2024 5.72 5.72 4.87 5.46 5.46 4.86

2025 5.81 5.81 4.87 5.50 5.50 4.85

2026 5.89 5.89 4.87 5.53 5.53 4.85

2027 5.96 5.96 4.86 5.55 5.55 4.84

2028 6.02 6.02 4.86 5.56 5.56 4.84

2029 6.08 6.08 4.86 5.57 5.57 4.83

2030 6.12 6.12 4.85 5.57 5.57 4.83

2031 6.15 6.15 4.85 5.54 5.54 4.82

2032 6.18 6.18 4.85 5.51 5.51 4.82

2033 6.20 6.20 4.85 5.48 5.48 4.81

2034 6.21 6.21 4.84 5.45 5.45 4.80

2035 6.22 6.22 4.84 5.40 5.40 4.80

2036 6.22 5.05 4.83 5.36 5.36 4.79

2037 6.21 4.83 4.83 5.31 5.31 4.79

2038 6.20 4.82 4.82 5.26 5.26 4.78

2039 6.18 4.82 4.82 5.20 5.20 4.77

2040 6.16 4.81 4.81 5.15 5.15 4.76

2041 6.14 4.81 4.81 5.10 5.10 4.76

2042 6.11 4.80 4.80 5.05 5.05 4.75

2043 6.09 4.79 4.79 5.00 5.00 4.74

2044 6.08 4.79 4.79 4.95 4.95 4.73

2045 6.06 4.78 4.78 4.91 4.91 4.72

2046 6.04 4.77 4.77 4.86 4.86 4.71

2047 6.02 4.77 4.77 4.82 4.82 4.71

2048 6.01 4.76 4.76 4.78 4.78 4.70

2049 5.99 4.75 4.75 4.74 4.74 4.69

2050 5.98 4.74 4.74 4.70 4.70 4.68

2051 5.97 4.74 4.74 4.67 4.67 4.67

2052 5.96 4.73 4.73 4.64 4.64 4.67

2053 5.95 4.73 4.73 4.61 4.61 4.66

2054 5.95 4.72 4.72 4.58 4.58 4.65

2055 5.95 4.71 4.71 4.55 4.55 4.64

2056 5.95 4.71 4.71 4.53 4.53 4.64

2057 5.94 4.70 4.70 4.51 4.51 4.63

2058 5.94 4.69 4.69 4.49 4.49 4.62

2059 5.94 4.69 4.69 4.47 4.47 4.61

2060 5.93 4.68 4.68 4.45 4.45 4.61

2061 5.93 4.68 4.68 4.43 4.43 4.60

2062 5.93 4.67 4.67 4.41 4.41 4.59

2063 5.92 4.66 4.66 4.40 4.40 4.59

2064 5.92 4.66 4.66 4.39 4.39 4.58

2065 5.91 4.65 4.65 4.38 4.38 4.57

2066 5.91 4.64 4.64 4.37 4.37 4.57

2067 5.91 4.64 4.64 4.37 4.37 4.56

2068 5.91 4.63 4.63 4.36 4.36 4.55

2069 5.92 4.63 4.63 4.36 4.36 4.55

2070 5.92 4.62 4.62 4.35 4.35 4.54

2071 5.92 4.62 4.62 4.34 4.34 4.54

2072 5.92 4.61 4.61 4.34 4.34 4.53

2073 5.93 4.60 4.60 4.33 4.33 4.52

2074 5.94 4.60 4.60 4.33 4.33 4.52

2075 5.94 4.59 4.59 4.33 4.33 4.51

2076 5.94 4.59 4.59 4.32 4.32 4.51

2077 5.95 4.58 4.58 4.32 4.32 4.50

2078 5.96 4.58 4.58 4.32 4.32 4.50

2079 5.96 4.58 4.58 4.32 4.32 4.49

2080 5.97 4.57 4.57 4.31 4.31 4.49

2081 5.98 4.57 4.57 4.31 4.31 4.48

2082 5.98 4.56 4.56 4.30 4.30 4.48

2083 5.99 4.56 4.56 4.30 4.30 4.48

2084 6.00 4.56 4.56 4.29 4.29 4.47

2085 6.01 4.55 4.55 4.29 4.29 4.47

Table 1c - Present Law and Proposal Cost, Expenditures, and Income: As Percent of Gross Domestic Product

November 9, 2011

Social Security Administration

Present Law OASDI Proposal OASDI

Calendar

Year

Based on Intermediate Assumptions of the 2011 Trustees Report. Office of the Chief Actuary

Representative Chaffetz Proposal: Basic Social Security Provisions
Year

Present Law OASDI

Trust Fund Assets /

Unfunded Obligation

Through End of Year

Changes 

in OASDI 

Income

Changes

in OASDI 

Cost

Basic

Changes

in OASDI

Cash Flow

Total Change

Through

End of Year

Proposal OASDI

Trust Fund Assets /

Unfunded Obligation

Through End of Year

(1) (2) (3) (4) = (2)-(3) (5) = cumulative sum(4) (6) = (1)+(5)

2011 2,564.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,564.6

2012 2,545.0 0.0 1.2 -1.1 -1.1 2,543.8

2013 2,527.9 0.1 2.7 -2.6 -3.7 2,524.3

2014 2,513.4 0.1 2.7 -2.6 -6.3 2,507.1

2015 2,496.7 0.1 2.7 -2.6 -9.0 2,487.7

2016 2,476.9 0.0 0.3 -0.3 -9.3 2,467.6

2017 2,451.1 -0.2 -2.4 2.2 -7.1 2,444.0

2018 2,417.9 -0.3 -5.5 5.1 -1.9 2,415.9

2019 2,370.3 -0.5 -9.1 8.6 6.6 2,377.0

2020 2,305.9 -0.7 -13.3 12.5 19.2 2,325.1

2021 2,224.7 -1.0 -17.9 16.9 36.0 2,260.7

2022 2,127.6 -1.3 -23.0 21.7 57.7 2,185.4

2023 2,015.9 -1.7 -30.3 28.6 86.3 2,102.2

2024 1,890.9 -2.1 -38.5 36.5 122.8 2,013.6

2025 1,753.6 -2.4 -45.5 43.1 165.9 1,919.5

2026 1,605.5 -2.7 -52.4 49.7 215.5 1,821.0

2027 1,448.1 -3.0 -59.3 56.3 271.8 1,719.9

2028 1,282.9 -3.3 -65.9 62.6 334.4 1,617.3

2029 1,111.6 -3.6 -71.9 68.3 402.7 1,514.3

2030 935.7 -3.8 -77.5 73.7 476.4 1,412.1

2031 757.0 -4.2 -84.4 80.2 556.6 1,313.6

2032 576.1 -4.5 -90.8 86.4 643.0 1,219.1

2033 393.8 -4.8 -96.8 92.1 735.1 1,128.9

2034 211.4 -5.0 -102.3 97.3 832.4 1,043.8

2035 29.8 -5.3 -107.7 102.4 934.8 964.5

2036 -150.6 -5.5 -112.5 107.0 1,041.8 891.2

2037 -329.1 -5.7 -116.9 111.1 1,152.9 823.8

2038 -504.7 -5.9 -120.7 114.8 1,267.7 763.0

2039 -676.9 -6.1 -124.1 118.0 1,385.7 708.8

2040 -845.5 -6.3 -127.1 120.8 1,506.5 661.0

2041 -1,010.4 -6.4 -129.5 123.1 1,629.7 619.3

2042 -1,171.6 -6.5 -131.7 125.2 1,754.8 583.2

2043 -1,329.5 -6.7 -133.8 127.1 1,881.9 552.4

2044 -1,484.4 -6.8 -135.7 128.9 2,010.9 526.4

2045 -1,636.3 -6.9 -137.5 130.6 2,141.5 505.1

2046 -1,785.2 -7.0 -139.1 132.1 2,273.6 488.3

2047 -1,931.5 -7.0 -140.5 133.5 2,407.1 475.6

2048 -2,075.1 -7.1 -141.9 134.8 2,541.8 466.8

2049 -2,216.1 -7.2 -143.1 136.0 2,677.8 461.7

2050 -2,354.8 -7.3 -144.3 137.0 2,814.8 460.0

2051 -2,491.4 -7.3 -145.3 138.0 2,952.8 461.4

2052 -2,626.4 -7.4 -146.3 138.9 3,091.7 465.3

2053 -2,759.9 -7.4 -147.2 139.8 3,231.5 471.6

2054 -2,892.1 -7.5 -148.0 140.5 3,372.0 479.9

2055 -3,023.3 -7.5 -148.7 141.2 3,513.2 490.0

2056 -3,153.5 -7.6 -149.6 142.0 3,655.2 501.7

2057 -3,282.7 -7.6 -150.1 142.5 3,797.7 515.0

2058 -3,410.8 -7.6 -150.3 142.7 3,940.4 529.6

2059 -3,537.8 -7.7 -150.3 142.7 4,083.1 545.3

2060 -3,663.4 -7.7 -150.1 142.5 4,225.6 562.1

2061 -3,787.8 -7.6 -149.7 142.1 4,367.7 579.9

2062 -3,911.0 -7.6 -149.2 141.6 4,509.2 598.3

2063 -4,032.9 -7.6 -148.4 140.8 4,650.1 617.1

2064 -4,153.8 -7.6 -147.5 140.0 4,790.0 636.3

2065 -4,273.6 -7.5 -146.5 139.0 4,929.0 655.4

2066 -4,392.6 -7.4 -145.2 137.8 5,066.8 674.2

2067 -4,510.8 -7.4 -144.0 136.6 5,203.4 692.6

2068 -4,628.3 -7.3 -142.9 135.6 5,339.0 710.8

2069 -4,745.1 -7.3 -142.0 134.7 5,473.7 728.6

2070 -4,861.5 -7.2 -141.1 133.9 5,607.6 746.1

2071 -4,977.2 -7.2 -140.4 133.2 5,740.8 763.6

2072 -5,092.4 -7.1 -139.6 132.5 5,873.3 780.9

2073 -5,207.2 -7.1 -138.9 131.8 6,005.1 797.9

2074 -5,321.6 -7.0 -138.0 131.0 6,136.1 814.5

2075 -5,435.5 -7.0 -137.2 130.2 6,266.3 830.8

2076 -5,548.9 -6.9 -136.1 129.2 6,395.5 846.6

2077 -5,661.8 -6.9 -135.2 128.3 6,523.8 862.0

2078 -5,774.2 -6.8 -134.4 127.5 6,651.3 877.1

2079 -5,886.2 -6.8 -133.6 126.8 6,778.1 891.9

2080 -5,997.7 -6.8 -132.9 126.1 6,904.3 906.6

2081 -6,108.7 -6.7 -132.1 125.4 7,029.7 920.9

2082 -6,219.3 -6.7 -131.4 124.8 7,154.4 935.1

2083 -6,329.5 -6.6 -130.8 124.2 7,278.6 949.2

2084 -6,439.2 -6.6 -130.3 123.7 7,402.3 963.1

2085 -6,548.4 -6.6 -129.8 123.2 7,525.5 977.1

Total 2011-2085 -400.9 -7926.4 7525.5

Based on Intermediate Assumptions of the 2011 Trustees Report. Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

Ultimate Real Trust Fund Yield of 2.9%.

(Billions of Dollars, Present Value on 1-1-2011)

Table 1d - Change in Long-Range Trust Fund Assets / Unfunded Obligation

November 9, 2011

Representative Chaffetz Proposal: Basic Social Security Provisions