alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Unify Corporation (the
Company) for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven
D. Bonham, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (Section 906), that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) |  | The Report fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and                                                                   
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | The information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the
      period covered by the Report.

June 30, 2008

/s/ STEVEN D. BONHAMSteven D. BonhamChief Financial Officer


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification
accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 and shall not, except to the
extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the
Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.

---
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 22 (Wednesday, February 3, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5766-5767]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-01936]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Meeting of the Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS; 
Correction

AGENCY: Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the 
Secretary, Office of
    the Assistant Secretary for Health.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The meeting of the Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS 
(PACHA) scheduled for January 28 and 29, 2016, is postponed due to 
inclement weather. This meeting will be rescheduled at a future date.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Caroline Talev, MPA, Committee 
Manager, Hubert Humphrey Building, 200 Independence Avenue SW., 
Washington, DC 20201. Phone: 202-205-1178. Fax: 202-401-4005. Email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c685a7b4a9aaafa8a3e892a7aaa3b086aeaeb5e8a1a9b0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8ccfedfee3e0e5e2e9a2d8ede0e9facce4e4ffa2ebe3fa">[email protected]</span></a>.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of January 5, 2016, Vol. 81, No. 2, on 
pages 243-244 a meeting of the Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/
AIDS was announced. That meeting has been cancelled due to inclement 
weather.


[[Page 5767]]


    Dated: January 28, 2016.
B. Kaye Hayes,
Executive Director, Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS, U.S. 
Department of Health and Human Services.
[FR Doc. 2016-01936 Filed 2-2-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4150-29-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
## Summary Measures and Graphs

- Individual Provisions
- Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable)

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						E2.11: Eliminate the taxable maximum in years 2029 and later. Phase in elimination by taxing all earnings above the current-law taxable maximum at: 2.48 percent in 2025, 4.96 percent in 2026, and so on, up to 12.40 percent in 2029. Provide benefit credit for earnings above the current-law taxable maximum that are subject to the payroll tax, using a secondary PIA formula. This secondary PIA formula involves: (1) an "AIME+" derived from annual earnings from each year after 2024 that were in excess of that year's current-law taxable maximum; and (2) a formula factor of 5 percent on this newly computed "AIME+".**

|  |  |
|--|--|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERICAN MEDIA, INC. FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH
30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1998
<CASH>                                           7,405
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,852
<ALLOWANCES>                                       266
<INVENTORY>                                     10,390
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,328
<PP&E>                                          44,148
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,149
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 648,060
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           84,268
<BONDS>                                        497,535
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           428
<OTHER-SE>                                      57,910
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   648,060
<SALES>                                        307,684
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               307,684
<CGS>                                          237,724
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  237,724
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,790
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              50,486
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,684
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,152
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,532
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,532
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

The undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity
as an officer of Allegiance Telecom, Inc. (the "Company"), that, to his knowledge, the Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

|Dated: August 27, 2003 |  | By: |  | /s/THOMAS M. LORDName: Thomas M. Lord,
Title:Executive Vice President of Corporate
Development and Chief Financial Officer
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 331 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the age requirement 

with respect to eligibility for qualified ABLE programs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 22, 2021 

Mr. CASEY (for himself, Mr. MORAN, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. 

BOOZMAN, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, and Ms. MURKOWSKI) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the age requirement with respect to eligibility for qualified ABLE programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘ABLE Age Adjust5 ment Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF AGE REQUIREMENT FOR QUALI7 FIED ABLE PROGRAMS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 529A(e) of the Internal 

9 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘age 26’’ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 331 IS

1 each place it appears in paragraphs (1)(A) and 

2 (2)(A)(i)(II) and inserting ‘‘age 46’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

5 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

STEVEN PITTMAN,

Petitioner

v.

PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 11 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of July, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
EXHIBIT 10.6



January 2, 2003



Steven G. Deaton

Executive Vice President

Chattahoochee National Bank

3625 Brookside Parkway, Suite 100

Alpharetta,
Georgia 3002-4434



Re: Amendment to an Employment Agreement
between Steven G. Deaton and CNB Holdings and Chattahoochee National Bank (collectively CNB) dated September , 2001.



Dear Mr. Deaton:



I have been authorized by the Board of Directors of CNB to amend your existing Employment Agreement as described below:



Exhibit A



Salary

7/03 to 6/04 $135,000

to

1/03 to 6/04 $135,000.



All other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall
remain unchanged.



Please signify your acceptance of this change
with your signature where indicated below.



Yours truly,



H. N. Padget, Jr.

President and CEO



|Accepted this 2nd day of January, 2003 |  | /S/    STEVEN G. DEATONSteven G. Deaton
|-------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
#### Signature Brokerage Inc., Appellant, v Group Health Incorporated, Respondent.

[772 NYS2d 812]

*197Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered December 26, 2002, which granted defendant health insurance company’s motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff insurance broker’s complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court correctly held that the first alleged oral agreement, providing for defendant’s hiring of plaintiff to act as its billing administrator with respect to the new subscriber, cannot be enforced due to the lack of material terms *(see Matter of Express Indus. & Term. Corp. v New York State Dept. of Transp.,*93 NY2d 584, 589-590 [1999]), including the new subscriber’s assent to the arrangement, and the terms and conditions of the alleged employment. The motion court also correctly held that the second alleged oral agreement, providing for defendant’s payment of a broker’s commission if and when Insurance Law § 4312 were amended to allow not-for-profit insurance companies to use brokers, would compensate a broker for negotiating a business opportunity, and is therefore barred by the statute of frauds (General Obligations Law § 5-701 [a] [10]). The September 1993 letter signed by defendant’s vice-president does not indicate, inter alia, contract duration, rate of compensation or indeed any of defendant’s promises given in exchange for plaintiffs services, and therefore fails to satisfy the statute of frauds *(see Intercontinental Planning v Daystrom, Inc.,*24 NY2d 372, 378-379 [1969], citing, inter alia, *Stulsaft v Mercer Tube & Mfg. Co.,*288 NY 255, 258 [1942]). In view of the parties’ prior relationship, plaintiff’s introduction of defendant to the new subscriber could have been done with the expectation that defendant would engage plaintiff as broker for other, future opportunities arising after amendment of the law, and therefore was not part performance unequivocally referable to the alleged oral contracts *(see Baytree Assoc. v Forster,*240 AD2d 305, 307 [1997], *lv denied*90 NY2d 810 [1997]).

We have considered plaintiffs other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Williams, Lerner and Marlow, JJ.
Exhibit
23.2








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
ENGINEERS





As
independent engineering consultants, Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc.
hereby consents to the use of our report entitled “Evaluation of Oil and Gas
Reserves to the Interests of Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. in Certain Domestic
Oil and Gas Properties and to the Interests of Warrior Gas Company in the Gataga
Gas Unit No. 5A, Vermejo (Ellenburger) Field, Loving County, Texas Effective
December 31, 2007, for Disclosure to the Securities and Exchange Commission,
Williamson Project 7.9245” dated March 6, 2008 and data extracted therefrom
(and all references to our Firm) included in or made a part of this Form 10-K
Annual Report to be filed on or about March 14, 2008 and to the
incorporation by reference of this Form 10-K Annual Report (including the use of
our report and references to our Firm herein) into that certain Registration
Statement on Form S-3 filed by Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, file number 333-116825, and those certain Registration
Statements on Form S-8 filed by Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, file numbers 33-68320, 33-68318, 33-68316,
33-69688, and 33-92834 covering the Bonus Incentive Plan of Clayton Williams
Energy, Inc., 1993 Stock Compensation Plan of Clayton Williams Energy, Inc.,
Outside Directors Stock Option Plan of Clayton Williams Energy, Inc., Clayton
Williams Energy, Inc. 401(k) Plan & Trust, and the Executive Incentive Stock
Compensation Plan of Clayton Williams Energy, Inc., respectively.

















WILLIAMSON
PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS, INC.





Midland,
Texas


March 14,
2008
**Exhibit 31.1**
**RULE 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION**
I, H.N. Padget, Jr., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of CNBHoldings, Inc; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   November 12, 2004 /s/ H.N. Padget, Jr. *Date* *H.N. Padget, Jr.* *President and Chief Executive Officer* *(principal executive officer)*
## Detailed Single Year Tables

- Individual Provisions
- Level of Monthly Benefits

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						B3.14: Beginning with those newly eligible for OASDI benefits in 2025, reduce the 15 percent PIA factor by 2 percentage points per year so that it reaches 5 percent for those newly eligible in 2029 and later.**

### Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program

### Summarized Estimates
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
 
  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
filed on Forms S-8 in connection with Vertel Corporation's 1988 Stock Option
Plan, the 1990 Stock Option Plan for Irish Employees, the 1991 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan, the 1991 Directors' Stock Option Plan, the 1983 Raycom Stock
Option Plan, the 1993 Raycom Stock Option Plan, the 1995 Executive Stock
Option Plan, the 1996 Directors' Stock Option Plan, and the 1998 Stock Option
Plan of our report dated February 4, 1999, except for Note 15 as to which the
date is March 18, 1999, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Vertel
Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1998.
 
                                          Deloitte & Touche LLP
 
Los Angeles, California
March 30, 1999
#### ARCADY FARMS MILLING COMPANY, INC. v. W. U. LAWS and wife, HELEN B. LAWS, and G. C. HUNTER, Trustee for PEOPLES BANK.

(Filed 30 June, 1955.)

Appeal and Error § 33—

Where no assignments of error appear in the record on appeal, the appeal must be dismissed for failure to comply with the mandatory requirement of Rule of Practice in the Supreme Court No. 19(3).

*506Appeals by plaintiff and by defendants Laws from *Sharp, Special Judge,*1 November, 1954, Special Term, of PERSON.

Plaintiff’s action is to recover judgment on demand promissory note for $39,327.24 dated 7 October, 1953, and to foreclose liens on real and personal property constituting security therefor.

■ Defendants Laws, in their answer, admit the execution of the note and security therefor but allege facts purporting to constitute an affirmative defense to plaintiff’s action. In addition, defendant W. U. Laws seeks to recover judgment against plaintiff on three alleged cross-actions.

Plaintiff demurred to the alleged affirmative defense. The court sustained this demurrer, striking designated portions of the answer. To this ruling, defendants Laws excepted and appealed.

Plaintiff also demurred to each cross-action. The court overruled these demurrers. To these rulings, plaintiff excepted and appealed.

The rulings do not relate to defendant G. C. Hunter, Trustee. He takes no part in these appeals.

*Melvin H. Burke for plaintiff appellee and appellant.*

*Burns & Long and Clarence Ross for defendants Laws, appellees and appellants.*

PER Curiam.

No assignments of error appear in the record filed in this Court. This is true as to both appeals. Hence, the appeals must be dismissed for failure to comply with the mandatory requirement of the rules of this Court. Rule 19(3), Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N.C. 546 (554).

Appeal of plaintiff: Dismissed.

Appeal of defendants Laws: Dismissed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ALFRED C. CARRERA, II,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 708 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 17th day of April, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
### Proposed Provision: F3. Expand covered earnings to include employer and employee premiums for employer-sponsored group health insurance (ESI). Starting in 2027, phase out the OASDI payroll tax exclusion for ESI premiums. Set an exclusion level at the 75th percentile of premium distribution in 2027, with amounts above that subject to the payroll tax. Reduce the exclusion level each year by 10 percent of the 2027 exclusion level until fully eliminated in 2037.

back
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                    Jan-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                      Mar-31-2000
<CASH>                                         487,711
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  330,308
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    581,911
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,401,305
<PP&E>                                      12,649,339
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,975,270
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,194,451
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,730,835
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           283
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,181,913
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,194,451
<SALES>                                      2,935,849
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,935,849
<CGS>                                        1,088,342
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,088,342
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,909,215
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              43,525
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3,300)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3,300)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,300)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.001)



</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  NewCom  International,  Inc.,  a
Delaware  corporation,  (the  "Company")  on Form  10-QSB for the period  ending
September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Walter Grieves,  Chief Financial  Officer of the
Company,  certify the following  pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

         1.       The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information  contained in the report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Walter Grieves
------------------------------------------
Walter Grieves, Chief Executive Officer
October 23, 2003