alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99

                            NATIONWIDE CREDIT, INC.

                 RECONCILIATION OF NET LOSS TO ADJUSTED EBITDA

                         (Dollar amounts in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           Quarter Ended March 31,
                                                         ---------------------------
                                                            2001             2000
                                                         Unaudited         Unaudited
                                                         ---------         ---------
<S>                                                      <C>               <C>
   Net loss                                              $  (1,358)        $  (2,451)
   Add:  Depreciation and amortization                       3,020             2,804
         Provision for employee severance, office
                closure and other unusual charges                -               334
         Interest expense                                    3,601             3,487
         GAAP rent                                              35                31
                                                         ---------         ---------
   Adjusted EBITDA  (A)                                  $   5,298         $   4,205
                                                         =========         =========
</TABLE>

Notes:

(A)  Adjusted EBITDA is defined in the Company's credit agreement as earnings
     before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and certain unusual
     costs. Adjusted EBITDA excludes non-recurring expenses for which the
     Company will have no on-going cash requirements and certain other costs
     which the Company believes are unusual, largely non-recurring and which are
     expected to have no impact on the on-going operations of the Company.
     Adjusted EBITDA does not represent cash flows as defined by generally
     accepted accounting principles and does not necessarily indicate that cash
     flows are sufficient to fund all of the Company's cash needs. Adjusted
     EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for net
     income (loss), cash flows from operating activities or other measures of
     liquidity determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting
     principles. Not all companies calculate adjusted EBITDA in the same fashion
     and therefore may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of
     other companies.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3363 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3363

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 135 West Wisconsin Street in Russell, Kansas, as the ``Robert J. 
                 Dole Memorial Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 9, 2021

Mr. Moran (for himself and Mr. Marshall) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 135 West Wisconsin Street in Russell, Kansas, as the ``Robert J. 
                 Dole Memorial Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ROBERT J. DOLE MEMORIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 135 West Wisconsin Street in Russell, Kansas, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Robert J. Dole Memorial Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Robert J. 
Dole Memorial Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 0.43 0.69 12% 16%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

August 1, 2023

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Retirement Age

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: C1.1. Starting with those age 62 in 2024, increase the normal retirement age (NRA) 1 

month every 2 years until the NRA reaches 68.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members         
    -  AEE Multimedia         
    -  AEE Research Library 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# PHOTOS ANDVIDEOS

Search

Search

                                - All Images 
                                - Other 
                                - Space Shuttle 

                                - Upload Date
                                - Photo Date
                                - Title

----

Download Image: Full Size (5.77 MB)

Tags:Space Command, Change of Command, CoC, USSPACECOM, Spacecom

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
#### JAMES C. DAVIS, AGENT OF THE UNITED STATES RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION, and SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY COMPANY v. HILTON LUMBER COMPANY.

(Filed 25 November, 1925.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *Grady, J.,*at December Term, 1924, of New HANOVER.

Civil action to recover demurrage, unloading and storage charges, and war taxes incidental thereto, on three ear loads of lumber loaded and tendered by defendant to plaintiff for shipment, same being refused. Tbe defendant in its answer denied liability for said charges, and set up a counterclaim for damages for tbe wrongful sale and conversion of defendant’s lumber on said cars.

Tbe jury, responding to tbe issues submitted, found: (1) That tbe first car load of lumber, tendered by defendant to plaintiff for shipment, 18 March, 1918, destination Guenther’s Siding, Philadelphia, was not offered in violation of a valid embargo then existing; (2) that tbe two car loads of lumber, tendered by defendant to plaintiff for shipment, 21 March, 1918, destination New York and Brooklyn, were not offered in violation of a valid embargo then existing; (3) that tbe plaintiff, Eail-road Administration, wrongfully refused to issue bills of lading for said shipments; and (4) that the defendant was entitled to recover of tbe plaintiff tbe sum of $2,463.24, on account of tbe matters and things alleged in tbe answer.

From a judgment on tbe verdict in favor of defendant, tbe plaintiff appeals, assigning errors.

*John D. Bellamy & Sons for plaintiff.*

*Bryan '<& Campbell for defendant.*

*874Pee Cueiam:.

Several serious exceptions have been entered on tbe record, but a careful perusal of tbe whole case leaves us witb tbe impression tbat they should all be resolved in favor of tbe validity of tbe trial. Most of tbe questions, presently sought to be presented, were considered by us on a former appeal, 185 N. C., 227; and tbe court on tbe second trial, seems to have followed tbe law substantially as declared on tbe first appeal. ¥e are not now permitted to review any question which was decided on tbe former appeal, as a party who loses in this Court may not have tbe case reheard by a second appeal. *Ray v. Veneer Co.,*188 N. C., 414.

“A decision by tbe Supreme Court on a prior appeal constitutes tbe law of tbe case, both in subsequent proceedings in tbe trial court and on a subsequent appeal.” *Harrington v. Rawls,*136 N. C., 65. To like effect are numerous decisions in this and other jurisdictions. See Note, 34 L. R. A., 321. Speaking to tbe question in *Vann v. Edwards,*135 N. C., p. 676, it was said tbat “tbe decision of a Court of final resort, upon a given state of facts, becomes tbe law of tbe case upon a second trial and another appeal in regard to those facts, if they are substantially tbe same as those upon which tbe former decision was made.”

It would serve na useful purpose to consider tbe exceptions *seriatim,*as tbe law of tbe case was settled and discussed by us on tbe former appeal.

Tbe verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

CoNNOE, J., did not sit.
## Detailed Single Year Tables

- Individual Provisions
- Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable)

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						E2.2: Eliminate the taxable maximum in years 2024 and later, and apply full 12.4 percent payroll tax rate to all earnings. Provide benefit credit for earnings above the current-law taxable maximum.**

### Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program

### Summarized Estimates
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 23 (Thursday, February 4, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 6004]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02137]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice of Termination; 10360 Cortez Community Bank; Brooksville, 
Florida

    The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), as Receiver for 
10360 Cortez Community Bank, Brooksville, Florida (Receiver) has been 
authorized to take all actions necessary to terminate the receivership 
estate of Cortez Community Bank (Receivership Estate); The Receiver has 
made all dividend distributions required by law.
    The Receiver has further irrevocably authorized and appointed FDIC-
Corporate as its attorney-in-fact to execute and file any and all 
documents that may be required to be executed by the Receiver which 
FDIC-Corporate, in its sole discretion, deems necessary; including but 
not limited to releases, discharges, satisfactions, endorsements, 
assignments and deeds.
    Effective February 1, 2016 the Receivership Estate has been 
terminated, the Receiver discharged, and the Receivership Estate has 
ceased to exist as a legal entity.

    Dated: February 1, 2016.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-02137 Filed 2-3-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
Projection Models Used by the 

Office of the Chief Actuary: 

Perspective on MINT and 

Microsimulation

Steve Goss, Chief Actuary, SSA 

Social Security Advisory Board Forum

May 30, 2019 
OCACT Cost Projection Models

• Generally mixed macro/micro models for current-law projections

• Make best use of available data exploiting comparative model strengths

• Macro models for basic projections of population and economy 

• Micro models where changing distributional factors can be modeled

• Particularly changing worker earnings histories affecting insured status and benefit level

• “Polisim” used in limited cases for policy proposals

• One of many “side models” needed to cover a wide range of proposals

• Expansive full microsimulation model based on vast transitional probabilities

• Highly complex getting reasonable results given interactions among factors

• Need for feedback from macro models to benchmark projections

• Useful in considering some proposals, like child-care credit and drop-out years

• Makes use of simulated family structures

2
MINT – Collaborative Relationship

• MINT provides insight into important distributional effects

• Particularly poverty, as MINT simulates income and assets in addition to earnings 

• Highly useful for exploring family-based effects at micro level

• Example: retirement earnings test 

• Micro models where changing distributional factors can be modeled

• Particularly changing worker earnings histories affecting insured status and benefit level

• MINT scaled to Trustees’ projections developed by OCACT 

• Allows for close coordination and collaboration with OCACT cost estimates

• Provides distributional analysis consistent with Trustees Report projections

• Provides important additional understanding of proposal effects for policymakers

3
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quartely Report of Lionbridge Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Rory J. Cowan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Stephen J. Lifshatz, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 9, 2006



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ RORY J. COWAN      
|Rory J. Cowan          
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|/s/ STEPHEN J. LIFSHATZ
|Stephen J. Lifshatz    
|Chief Financial Officer
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	Commercial Integration Strategy Overview
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4619" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/DOD2/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint news">
    <div class="header">
        <img height="100" class="print-logo" alt="Site Logo" src="/Portals/57/spacecom-logo.png?ver=DL6eDR7B9pBwEnWyDk78jA%3d%3d" />

        <h1 class="title">Commercial Integration Strategy Overview</h1>
    </div>
    
<div id="adetail-slick-gallery" class="gallery">
    
    <div class="item">
        
        <div class="image">
            
            <img src="https://media.defense.gov/2022/Apr/11/2002974216/1920/1080/0/220408-F-XO712-1002.JPG"
                 class="aimage img-responsive"
                 alt="Commercial Integrations Strategy Overview"
                 itemprop="image" />
        </div>
        
        
        
        
        
        <div class="slide-info-hidden">
            <div class="slide-info-inner">
            
            <div class="image-title">Commercial Integrations Strategy Overview</div>
            <div class="image-caption">Commercial Integrations Strategy Overview</div>
        </div>
    </div>
    </div>

    
</div>
<div class="slide-info"></div>





    <div> <span class="date">/ Published April 8, 2022</span></div>
    <span class="dateline-text"></span>
    <a href="https://media.defense.gov/2022/Apr/08/2002973437/-1/-1/1/CIS%20OVERVIEW%20FINAL%201APR22.PDF" target="_blank"><img alt="Commercial Integration Strategy Overview" src="/Portals/57/220408-F-XO712-1002_1.jpg" style="width: 574px; height: 865px;" title="Commercial Integration Strategy Overview" /></a><br />
</div>

    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

___________________________________

)

RONALD L. WHITE et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 14-0478 (PLF)

)

TOM VILSACK, Secretary, )

United States Department of Agriculture, )

)

Defendant. )

___________________________________ )

ORDER

For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion issued this 

same day, it is hereby

ORDERED that the defendant’s motion [Dkt. No. 4] to dismiss the plaintiffs’ 

complaint is GRANTED; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 

The Clerk of the Court shall remove this case from the Court’s docket. This is a final appealable 

order. See FED. R. APP. P. 4(a).

SO ORDERED.

/s/__________________________

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN

United States District Judge

DATE: February 19, 2015
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Office of the Chief Actuary | The 2007 OASDI Trustees Report4/23/2007    Historical document   |
|-----------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|        |
|--------|
|   | Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     Last reviewed or modified Monday Jul 14, 2008 | Need Larger Text? |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1203

MICHELLE D. MAUPIN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

HOWARD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM; HOWARD COUNTY BOARD OF 

EDUCATION; SYDNEY COUSIN, Individually and in his official 

capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, District Judge. 

(1:10-cv-02659-BEL)

Submitted: June 19, 2012 Decided: July 18, 2012

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michelle D. Maupin, Appellant Pro Se. Edmund J. O’Meally, Lisa 

Y. Settles, HODES, PESSIN & KATZ, PA, Towson, Maryland, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michelle D. Maupin appeals the district court’s order 

denying the motion for permissive joinder and dismissing her 

complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. Maupin v. Howard Cnty. Pub. Schs., No. 1:10-cv02659-BEL (D. Md. Feb. 7, 2012). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### J. J. FEREBEE v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD CO.

(Filed 23 September, 1925.)

Appeal by defendant from *Oranmer, J.,*at April Term, 1925, of Currituck.

Civil action to recover damages for an alleged negligent injury and killing of plaintiff’s livestock by defendant’s engines and cars.

From a verdict and judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals, assigning errors.

*855*Aydlett & Simpson for plaintiff.*

*Thompson & Wilson for defendant.*

Pee CuRiam.

Tbe evidence is conflicting on the main issue of liability; it is purely a question of fact; the jury has determined the matter against the defendant; there is no reversible error appearing on the record; the instruction on the burden of proof, when taken as a whole, must be resolved in favor of the validity of the trial; the verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Internationally recognized norms lead to safety and security in the space domain

U.S. Space Command

                COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo.  –              USSPACECOM’s eight proposed specific behaviors for operations in the space area of responsibility

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT