alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members         
    -  AEE Multimedia 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# PHOTOS ANDVIDEOS

Search

Search

                                - All Images 
                                - Other 
                                - Space Shuttle 

                                - Upload Date
                                - Photo Date
                                - Title

Clear Search5 results found.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted March 6, 2006

Decided March 13, 2006

Before

Hon. Richard A. Posner, Circuit Judge

Hon. Ilana Diamond Rovner, Circuit Judge

Hon. Terence T. Evans, Circuit Judge

No. 05-2772

NATHANIEL LINDELL, Appeal from the United States District

Plaintiff-Appellant, Court for the Western District of

Wisconsin.

v.

No. 02 C 473

JOANNE GOVIER,

Defendant-Appellee. Barbara B. Crabb, Chief Judge.

Lindell appeals from a judgment dismissing his prisoner’s civil rights suit, in

which he primarily claims that the prison is unlawfully restricting his practice of his

religion (Wotanism). We had remanded a previous such judgment, in which the

district judge had dismissed the suit prematurely, without addressing the merits of

Lindell’s claims. Lindell v. McCallum, 352 F.3d 1107 (7th Cir. 2003). In summary

judgment proceedings on remand, the judge determined that the claims had no

merit, and again dismissed, and Lindell has again appealed.

The district judge’s painstaking analysis is sound, and we have nothing to add

to it except to note that any residual doubt about the lack of merit of Lindell’s

religious claims has been dispelled by our recent decision in Borzych v. Frank, No.

05–3907, 2006 WL 488451 (7th Cir. Mar. 2, 2006).

AFFIRMED.

UNPUBLISHED ORDER

Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.2

                            ALLEGIANCE TELECOM, INC.

                    COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (LOSS)

                       Three Months Ended March 31, 1999

                 (In thousands, except share per share amount)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            Number of Shares    Percent Outstanding          Equivalent Shares
                                                            ----------------    -------------------          -----------------
<S>                                                         <C>                 <C>                          <C>
1997  Common Stock Offering                                              639                 100.00%                       639
1998  Common Stock Offering                                       15,000,000                 100.00%                15,000,000
Preferred Stock Converted to Common Stock                         60,511,692                 100.00%                60,511,692
Treasury Shares                                                      (37,968)                 55.56%                   (21,096)
1999 Employee Stock Discount Purchase Plan Shares Issued              66,936                  96.67%                    64,706
                                                                                                                  ------------
                                                                                                                  $ 75,555,941

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING                                                                               $ 75,555,941

NET LOSS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK                                                                               $    (49,126)

NET LOSS PER SHARE, BASIC AND DILUTED                                                                             $      (0.65)
                                                                                                                  ============

</TABLE>
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 1.79 2.41 50% 56%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

September 15, 2023

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Payroll Taxes (including maximum taxable)

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: E1.9. Increase the payroll tax rate (currently 12.4 percent) by 0.1 percentage point 

each year from 2027-2050, until the rate reaches 14.8 percent in 2050 and later.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 24 (Friday, February 5, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 6285]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02184]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Cancellation of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of the cancellation of the Center for 
Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, February 24, 2016, 10:00 a.m. 
to February 24, 2016, 5:00 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, which was published in the Federal 
Register on January 26, 2016, 81 FR 4318.
    The meeting is cancelled due to the reassignment of applications.

    Dated: February 1, 2016.
Anna Snouffer,
Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-02184 Filed 2-4-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1




SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO\


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Online Vacation Center Holdings Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward B. Rudner, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date: August 10, 2010






/s/ Edward B. Rudner


Edward B. Rudner


Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer






Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing).
65244 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 243 / Tuesday, December 19, 1995 / Rules and Regulations

Dated: September 28, 1995.

Richard Biondi,

Acting Director, Manufacturing, Energy, and

Transportation Division, Office of

Compliance.

[FR Doc. 95–30790 Filed 12–18–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 90–468; RM–7380]

Radio Broadcasting Services;

Wickenburg and Lake Havasu City, AZ

AGENCY: Federal Communications

Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; petition for

reconsideration.

SUMMARY: This documents grants a

Petition for Reconsideration filed by

Interstate Broadcasting System of

Arizona, Inc., licensee of Station KRDSFM, Channel 287C2, Wickenburg,

Arizona, directed to the Report and

Order in this proceeding which had

upgraded the Station KRDS-FM license

to specify operation on Channel 287C1.

See 56 FR 43884, September 5, 1991.

With this action, the proceeding is

terminated.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 26, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Robert Hayne, Mass Media Bureau,

(202) 776–1654.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a

synopsis of the Commission’s

Memorandum Opinion and Order in

MM Docket No. 90– 468, adopted

December 6, 1995, and released

December 12, 1995. The full text of this

decision is available for inspection and

copying during normal business hours

in the FCC Reference Center (Room

239), 1919 M Street, NW., Washington,

DC. The complete text of this decision

may also be purchased from the

Commission’s copy contractor,

International Transcription Service,

Inc., (202) 857–3800, 1919 M Street,

NW., Room 246, or 2100 M Street, NW.,

Suite 140, Washington, DC 20037.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

Radio broadcasting.

Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of

Federal Regulations is amended as

follows:

PART 73—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 73

continues to read as follows:

Authority: Secs. 303, 48 Stat., as amended,

1082; 47 U.S.C. 154, as amended.

§ 73.202 [Amended]

2. Section 202(b), the Table of FM

Allotments under Arizona, is amended

by removing Channel 287C1 and adding

Channel 287C2 at Wickenburg.

Federal Communications Commission.

Douglas W. Webbink,

Chief, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media

Bureau.

[FR Doc. 95–30757 Filed 12–18–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712–01–F
#### Philip Huston, Respondent, v. Edward J. Gilbert, Appellant.

If plaintiff will stipulate witnin twenty days of the service of this order to reduce the damages to $3,500, then the judgment so modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal, if not, then on the defendant paying the costs of the trial and of his appeal in twenty days thereafter, a new trial is granted ; if defendant does not pay such costs, then judgment and order affirmed, with costs and order to he settled by Learned, P. J.

Opinion by

Learned. P. J.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 22

- 00419

- CV

James Ernest WALLACE Sr.,

Appellant

v.

Letitia Ann WALLACE

, Appellee

From the 45th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010

- CI

- 10056

Honorable Angelica Jimenez , Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE RIOS , AND JUSTICE VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED. Costs of appeal are assessed against appellant Jame s Ernest Wallace, Sr.

SIGNED February 28, 2024.

_____________________________ Irene Rios, Justice
Exhibit 99.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

The undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity
as an officer of Allegiance Telecom, Inc. (the "Company"), that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

|Dated: May 20, 2003 |  | By: |  | /s/ROYCE J. HOLLANDName: Royce J. Holland
Title:Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Allegiance Telecom, Inc. and will be retained by Allegiance Telecom, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
EX-35.1
(logo) EMC
Mortgage Corporation



ITEM 1123 ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

EMC MORTGAGE CORPORATION



The undersigned officers of EMC Mortgage Corporation ("EMC") as servicer
pursuant to the SACO I Trust 2007-1 (the "Agreement") hereby certify that:

1. A review of EMC's activities during the period from and including January 1,
   2007 through and including December 31, 2007 (the "Reporting Period") and
   EMC's performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, EMC has fulfilled all of
   its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the
   Reporting Period.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate on this
12th day of March 2008


By: /s/ David B. Little
David B. Little
Executive Vice President
Default Administration

/s/ Jenna Kemp
Jenna Kemp
Executive Vice President
Investor Administration

/s/ William Glasgow Jr.
William Glasgow Jr.
Executive Vice President
Enterprise Operations Services


(logo) MBA Member
Mortgage Bankers
Association of America

2780 Lake Vista Drive, Lewisville, Texas 75067
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 292190, Lewisville, Texas 75029-2190
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# PHOTOS ANDVIDEOS

Search

Search

                                - All Images 
                                - Other 
                                - Space Shuttle 

                                - Upload Date
                                - Photo Date
                                - Title

-  FIRST 
-   
-   
- 3
- 4
- 5 (current)
- 6
- 7
-   
-   
-  LAST
#### The People of the State of New York v. John N. Schuyler.

Ordered that execution of the judgment of the Oyer and Terminer of Otsego county takes place on the 10th day of November, 1887.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3257 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3257

 To amend the Controlled Substances Act to lengthen the period of time 
 during which certain controlled substances must be administered to a 
   patient after being delivered by a pharmacy to the administering 
                             practitioner.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 18, 2021

  Mrs. Shaheen (for herself and Mrs. Capito) introduced the following 
    bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Controlled Substances Act to lengthen the period of time 
 during which certain controlled substances must be administered to a 
   patient after being delivered by a pharmacy to the administering 
                             practitioner.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DELIVERY OF A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE BY A PHARMACY TO AN 
              ADMINISTERING PRACTITIONER.

    Section 309A of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 829a) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(5), by striking ``14 days'' and 
        inserting ``60 days''; and
            (2) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) by striking paragraph (1);
                    (B) by redesignating paragraphs (2) and (3) as 
                paragraphs (1) and (2), respectively;
                    (C) in paragraph (1), as so redesignated, by 
                striking ``the Attorney General,'' and all that follows 
                and inserting the following: ``the Attorney General may 
                modify the number of days described in subsection 
                (a)(5) if the Secretary determines that the 
                modification will--
                    ``(A) reduce the risk of diversion; or
                    ``(B) protect the public health.''; and
                    (D) in paragraph (2), as so redesignated, by 
                striking ``7 days'' and inserting ``14 days''.
                                 <all>
```
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-1473

___________ Barbara Kaminski, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Baxter County, Arkansas; John Doe, * #1-#10, who are or were deputies * and/or agents of Baxter County * Sheriff’s Department, in their official * capacity and in their individual * capacity, * * Appellees. * *

__________ Appeals from the United States No. 98-2056 District Court for the

__________ Western District of Arkansas. [UNPUBLISHED] Barbara Kaminski, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Baxter County, Arkansas, * * Defendant-Appellee, * * John Doe, #1-#10, who are or were *The Honorable H. Franklin Waters, United States District Judge for t he Western 1 District ofArkansas. -2- deputies and/or agents of the Baxter * County Sheriff& s Department, in * their official capacity and in their * individual capacity, * * Defendants-Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: October 15, 1998 Filed: November 2, 1998

___________ Before WOLLMAN, HANSEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. In these consolidated appeals, Barbara Kaminski appeals the district court & s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action stemming from a searchof her house and the denial of her motion to reconsider. Having reviewed the record and the parties & briefs, we conclude that the district court did not err

. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### CLARK P. CRAUMER v. JONAS GRANNICK.

(Filed 11 November, 1953.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *Burgwyn, Special Judge,*at March Term, 1953, of HaeNett.

Civil action to recover damages for actionable negligence heard upon motion to strike allegations from answer.

This is a companion case to the action this day decided entitled *Penn Dixie lAnes, Inc., v. Jonas Grannick.*The plaintiff Clark P. Craumer sued the defendant Jonas Grannick for damages for the injury done his Ford tractor in the collision involved in that action. The complaint and the answer in this suit are couched in practically the same language as the complaint and the answer in the *Penn Dixie Lines case.*The plaintiff moved to strike from the answer in this suit third and fourth further answers and defenses virtually identical with the third and fourth further answers and defenses pleaded in the *Penn Dixie Lines case.*The presiding judge entered an order whereby he struck the fourth further answer and defense, and refused to strike the third further answer and defense. *560Each./pa-riy ¡noted .an appeal from .the portion of the order adverse to him. The defendant 'subsequently, abandoned his appeal. . ■.:

*Talmadge L. Narron for plaintiff, appellant.*

*A. J. Fletcher, F^.T. Dupree?Jr., and G. Earl Weaver for defendant, appellee.*

Ervin, J.

The plaintiff’s‘appeal challenges the validity of thé portion of the order refusing to strike the‘third further answer and defénsé from’ the’ answer:' For' the1 reasons' stated in the *Penn Dixie Lines case,*this c'ahise' is -remanded to’ the Superior Court of Harnett County with' directions that an order be entered' striking out the third further answer’ and defense.

Error and remanded.

’Winbokne, J., dissents.