alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 12-10654 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. JORGE ENRIQUE PONCE, Defendant-Appellant

A ppeal from the United States District Court f or the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:11-CR-35-1
Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Jorge Enrique Ponce has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 ( 1967), and United State s v . Flores , 632 F.3d 2 29 ( 5th Cir. 2011). Ponce has not filed a response. We have re v i e w e d c o u nsel’s brief and the relevant portio n s o f the r ecord reflected therein. We concur with c ounsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue f or appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion fo r l e a ve to withdraw i s GRANTED, counsel is U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s

F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D April 16, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R
. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R
. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 12-10654 Document: 00512209489 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/16/2013No. 12-10654

excused from further r esponsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS D ISMISSED. See 5 T H C I R
. R

. 42.2.

2 Case: 12-10654 Document: 00512209489 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/16/2013
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 1 9

- 1884 V

(not to be published)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

JUANITA CHAPLIN

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

* Special Master Katherine E. Oler

Filed: December 30 , 2021

Order Concluding Proceedings;

Vaccine Rule 21(a).

Patrick Hughes , Patriots Law Group of Lyons & Hughes, P.C., Suitland, MD, for Petitioner

Nancy Tinch , U.S. Dep artmen t of Justice, Washington, DC

, for Respondent

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS 1

On December 28 , 202 1 , pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a)(1)(B), the parties filed a joint

stipulation stating that the above

- captioned case should be dismissed. ECF No. 39

.

According ly, pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21 (a) (3) , the above

- captioned case is hereby

dismissed without prejudice

. The Clerk of the Court is hereby instructed that a judgment shall

not enter in the instant case pursuant t o Vaccine Rule 21(a).

Any questions regarding this Order may be directed to my law clerk, Sydney Lee , by

telephone at 202

- 357

- 6347, or by email at Sydney_Lee @cfc.uscourts.gov

.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Katherine E. Oler

Katherine E. Oler

Special Master

1 Although this Decision has been formally designated “not to be published,” it will nevertheless be posted

on the Court of Federal Claims’ website in accordance with the E

- Government Act of 2002, 44 U.S.C. §

3501 (2012). This means the D ecision will be available to anyone with access to the internet . As

provided by 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 12(d)(4)(B), however, the parties may object to the decision’s inclusion of

certain kinds of confidential information. Specifically, under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has fourteen

days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret

or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files

or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwa rranted invasion of privacy.”

Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the Decision in its present form will be available. Id.
IMAG-ZA 14 October 2020

MEMORANDUM FOR ALL U.S. Army Garrison (USAG) Miami Personnel

SUBJECT: Endorsement to the Secretary of the Army Anti-Harassment and Prevention 

Policy IAW AR 690-12 

1. The Department of the Army is committed to creating and maintaining a workplace 

free of harassment and discrimination. 

2. To reaffirm the Army’s commitment to Equal Employment Opportunity and a 

workplace environment free from harassment and discrimination, I endorse the 

enclosed policy memorandum.

Encl. GRETA M. BUCCELLATO 

 Garrison Manager

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 

US ARMY INSTALLATION MANAGEMENT COMMAND 

DIRECTORATE – SUSTAINMENT 

UNITED STATES ARMY GARRISON-MIAMI 

9301 NW 33RD STREET 

DORAL, FL 33172-1202 REPLY TO THE ATTENTION OF
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Meditecnic, Inc. (the "Company") on Form  10-QSB for the quarter  ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof  (the "Report"),  I, Bernard Arbalet, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Bernard Arbalet

By: Bernard Arbalet

Chief Executive  Officer

December 15, 2008
a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 b.
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;
 c.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
 d.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 b.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: April 30, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Joseph P. HannanJoseph P. HannanSenior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32(a)





ESI TRACTEBEL ACQUISITION CORP.


(the registrant)





Section 1350 Certification








We, T. J. Tuscai and Mark R. Sorensen, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the registrant for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 (Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.








Dated:  August 12, 2009














T. J. TUSCAI


T. J. Tuscai


President


(equivalent to the Chief Executive Officer)


ESI Tractebel Acquisition Corp.

















MARK R. SORENSEN


Mark R. Sorensen


Treasurer


(equivalent to the Chief Executive Officer)


ESI Tractebel Acquisition Corp.
























































A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into
any filing of the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing).
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.3

                            ALLEGIANCE TELECOM, INC.

                    COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (LOSS)

                        Three Months Ended June 30, 1998

                      (In thousands, except share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    NUMBER OF SHARES     PERCENT OUTSTANDING    EQUIVALENT SHARES
                                                    ----------------     -------------------    -----------------
<C>                                                 <C>                  <C>                    <C>
1997 Common Stock Offering                                       426              100.00%                    426
                                                                                                    ------------
                                                                                                             426

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING                                                                          426

NET LOSS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK                                                                 $    (20,890)

NET LOSS PER SHARE, BASIC AND DILUTED                                                               $ (49,037.56)
                                                                                                    ============
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report on Form 10-Q of Solar Energy Limited for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael James Gobuty, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

|(1) | This report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                                          
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the registrant at the end of the period covered by this report and results of operations of the registrant for the period covered by this report.

Date: August 13, 2010

/s/ Michael James GobutyMichael James GobutyChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Kyle Burkhalter

Office of the Chief AcSocial Security Admin

Cost-of-Living Adjustment

National Academy of Social Insurance

2018 Summer Intern Academy

August 1, 2018
Cost-of-Living Adjustments

 Since 1975, Social Security’s general benef

have been based on increases in the cost of measured by the Consumer Price Index (CP

 Effective for December benefits, payable in  Benefits keep pace with inflation
Consumer Price Index (CPI)

 Bureau of Labor Statistics produces monthly  COLAs are based on the Consumer Price In

Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (

 COLA = percentage increase (if any) in the a

CPI-W from Q3 of last year to Q3 of current 
COLA series, 1975-2017

Year COLA Year COLA Year COLA Year C

1975 8.0 1986 1.3 1997 2.1 2008 1976 6.4 1987 4.2 1998 1.3 2009 1977 5.9 1988 4.0 1999 2.5 2010 1978 6.5 1989 4.7 2000 3.5 2011 1979 9.9 1990 5.4 2001 2.6 2012 1980 14.3 1991 3.7 2002 1.4 2013 1981 11.2 1992 3.0 2003 2.1 2014 1982 7.4 1993 2.6 2004 2.7 2015 1983 3.5 1994 2.8 2005 4.1 2016 1984 3.5 1995 2.6 2006 3.3 2017 

1985 3.1 1996 2.9 2007 2.3
Simple, right?

 Bureau of Labor Statistics produces monthly 

changes in prices paid for a representative of goods and services

 CPI-W (and CPI-U) based on experience of 

relevant average household (spending habitof 7,000 families)

 Other indices, other approaches
Chained CPI (C-CPI-U)

 Based on idea that in an inflationary environ

consumers will choose less-expensive subs

 Lower-level vs. higher-level substitution bias By age 85, benefits would be about 6.5% lo OCACT estimates C-CPI-U would reduce th

COLA by 0.3 percentage point, on average
CPI for the Elderly (CPI-E)

 Basket of goods and services for those age  Certain expenditure groups, such as medica

housing, are given greater weight

 By age 85, benefits would be about 4.6% hi OCACT estimates CPI-E would increase the 

COLA by 0.2 percentage point, on average
Other variations

 Proposals to reduce or increase annual COL

currently calculated) by a set amount

 Chained CPI-W, chained CPI-E Hold disabled (DI), lower earners harmless No COLA for high earners
So what?

 Switching from CPI-W to chained CPI-W sta

December 2019 = 20% of shortfall eliminate

 Switching from CPI-W to CPI-E starting Dec

2020 = 14% increase in shortfall

 Reducing the annual COLA by 1 percentage 

starting December 2019 = 64% of shortfall e
Resources

 About 140 provisions scored annually:

https://www.ssa.gov/oact/solvency/provisions/in

 Cost-of-living adjustment provisions: 

https://www.ssa.gov/oact/solvency/provisions/co

 Bureau of Labor Statistics – Consumer Price 

https://www.bls.gov/cpi/home.htm
1
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CSB Bancorp, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this annual report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;
 c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and
 d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Eddie L. SteinerEddie L. SteinerChief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         118,600
<SECURITIES>                                    53,900
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               204,600
<PP&E>                                       1,008,500
<DEPRECIATION>                                 158,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,059,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           65,900
<BONDS>                                        463,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     501,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,059,300
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               282,100
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  174,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   900
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              38,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 78,300
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             78,300
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    78,300
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.02
        

</TABLE>
#### George B. Rossman, Respondent, v. The Knickerbocker Ice Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

Opinion by

Learned, P. J.
## Detailed Single Year Tables

- Individual Provisions
- Family Members

### **Description of Proposed Provision:						D3: Allow divorced aged spouses and divorced surviving spouses married 5 to 9 years to get benefits based on the former spouse's account. Divorced aged and surviving spouses would receive 50% of the applicable current-law PIA percentage if married 5 years, 60% of the applicable PIA percentage if married 6 years, ..., 90% of the applicable PIA percentage if married 9 years. This benefit would be available to divorced spouses on the rolls at the beginning of 2025 and those becoming eligible after 2024.**

### Financial Estimates for the OASDI Trust Fund Program

### Summarized Estimates
Exhibit 31.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Michael W.
Katz, certify that:



|(1) | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Perfumania Holdings, Inc.;
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 31, 2011



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|By: /S/ MICHAEL W. KATZ              
|Michael W. Katz                      
|President and Chief Executive Officer
Skip to main content

# Social Security

Search
Menu
Español
Sign in

## Flowchart for tax deposits & adjustments

Office of the Chief Actuary 

The flowchart below gives a simplified overview of how taxes, and    adjustments to those taxes, flow into the Social Security Trust Funds.  The main   players in the process are employers, the Social Security Administration, and   the Department of the Treasury.  In the flowchart, "FICA" refers to taxes on wages defined   in the Federal Insurance Contributions Act, and "SECA" refers to self-employment   taxes defined in the Self Employment Contributions Act.  See the table below the flowchart for   other acronyms.

Acronyms for organizations in flowchartAcronymOrganizationBEABureau of Economic Analysis, Department of CommerceBLSBureau of Labor Statistics, Department of LaborBFSBureau of the Fiscal Service, Department of the TreasuryIRSInternal Revenue Service, Department of the TreasuryOMBOffice of Management and Budget, Executive Office of the PresidentOTAOffice of Tax Analysis, Department of the TreasurySSASocial Security Administration

Footer menu