alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b.
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;c.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andd.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: November 1, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Joseph P. HannanJoseph P. HannanSenior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
#### Anson B. Moore, Executor, etc., Appellant, v. Robert O. Byrne and others, Respondents.

Judgment and order sustaining demurrer of defendant Stillwell to the complaint affirmed, with costs.

Opinion by

Dykman, J.
Exhibit
32(a)





ESI
TRACTEBEL ACQUISITION CORP.


(the
registrant)





Section
1350 Certification








We, T.
J. Tuscai and Mark R. Sorensen, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the registrant for the quarterly period
      ended March 31, 2009 (Report) fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      registrant.








Dated:  May
12, 2009














T.
      J. TUSCAI


T.
J. Tuscai


President


(equivalent
to the Chief Executive Officer)


ESI
Tractebel Acquisition Corp.

















MARK
      R. SORENSEN


Mark
R. Sorensen


Treasurer


(equivalent
to the Chief Executive Officer)


ESI
Tractebel Acquisition Corp.
























































A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant
to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 or
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of
the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such
filing).
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 24 (Friday, February 5, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6280-6281]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02246]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Meeting of the Advisory Committee on Minority Health; Correction

AGENCY: Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the 
Secretary, Office of Minority Health.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 6281]]

SUMMARY: The meeting of the Advisory Committee on Minority Health 
(ACMH) scheduled for January 28 and 29, 2016, is cancelled due to 
inclement weather. This meeting will be rescheduled at a future date.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Minh Wendt, Designated Federal 
Officer, ACMH; Tower Building, 1101 Wootton Parkway, Suite 600, 
Rockville, Maryland 20852. Phone: 240-453-8222. Fax: 240-453-8223. 
Email: [email protected].

Correction

    In the Federal Register of January 5, 2016, Vol. 81, No. 2, on 
pages 242-243 a meeting of the Advisory Committee on Minority Health 
was announced. That meeting has been cancelled due to inclement 
weather.

    Dated: February 1, 2016.
Minh Wendt,
Alternate Designated Federal officer, ACMH, Office of Minority Health, 
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
[FR Doc. 2016-02246 Filed 2-4-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4150-29-P
```
Exhibit
10.18
 SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE
RETIREMENT BENEFITS AGREEMENT
  RECITALS
      AGREEMENT
  Supplemental Retirement Benefits
 Payment of Benefits
 Full Benefit Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A




---



##### 



Exhibit A
 Early Termination Exhibit A
 Exhibit A
 Disability
 Discharge for Cause
 2




---



##### 



Death of Executive Exhibit B Exhibit B
 Benefits Mutually Exclusive
 Suspension of Payments.
 Intent of Parties
 ERISA Provisions
      3




---



##### 



Notice of Denial
 Contents of Notice of Denial
       Right to Review
   4




---



##### 



Application for Review
      Hearing
 Notice of Hearing
 Counsel
 5




---



##### 



Decision on Review
         Funding by the Bank
  6




---



##### 



Change in Control
  No Competition with Bank
 7




---



##### 



Employment of Executive; Other Agreements
 Confidentiality
 Withholding (i.e.
 Miscellaneous Provisions
 Counterparts
 Construction
 8




---



##### 



Severability
 Governing Law
 Binding Effect
 No Trust
 Assignment of Rights
 Entire Agreement
 Notice
 Bank:
    
    GEORGIA BANK & TRUST COMPANY OF AUGUSTA
3530 Wheeler Road
Augusta, GA 30909
Attn: Chairman of the BoardExecutive:
    
    R. DANIEL BLANTON
 9




---



##### 



Non-waiver
 Headings
 Amendment
 Seal
 Legal Expenses
  10




---



##### 



BANK:
GEORGIA BANK & TRUST COMPANY OF AUGUSTABy:ItsEXECUTIVE:R. DANIEL BLANTON 11




---



##### 



Exhibit A
       Year
    
    Limited BenefitJanuary 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009
    
    $
    152,888January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010
    
    $
    175,332January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011
    
    $
    185,776January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012
    
    $
    196,220January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013
    
    $
    206,664January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014
    
    $
    211,108January 1, 2015 to June 27, 2015
    
    $
    215,552June 28, 2015 and thereafter
    
    $
    220,000
   R. DANIEL BLANTON Exhibit A Exhibit A
 
 12




---



##### 



EXHIBIT B
 DESIGNATION OF BENEFICIARY FORM
under the
SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE
RETIREMENT BENEFITS AGREEMENT
  Primary Beneficiary(ies)
 
 
 
 
 
 *
    
    If more than one beneficiary is named above, the beneficiaries will share equally in any benefits,
unless you have otherwise provided above. Further, if you have named more than one beneficiary and
one or more of the beneficiaries is deceased at the time of your death, any remaining
beneficiary(ies) will share equally, unless you have provided otherwise above. If no primary
beneficiary survives you, then the contingent beneficiary designated below will receive any
benefits due upon your death. In the event you have no designated beneficiary upon your death, any
benefits due will be paid to your estate. In the event that you are naming a beneficiary that is
not a person, please provide pertinent information regarding the designation. Contingent Beneficiary
 
 
 
 
 DateR. DANIEL BLANTON
 13
#### Margaret A. Higgins, Administratrix, etc., Appellant, v. The New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad Company, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Pratt, J.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3382 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3382

To prohibit the Administrator of the Small Business Administration from 
   directly making loans under the 7(a) loan program, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 14, 2021

Mr. Scott of South Carolina (for himself, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Toomey, Mr. 
 Paul, Mr. Thune, Mr. Risch, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. 
Marshall, Mr. Daines, Mr. Tillis, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Lankford, Mr. Cornyn, 
   Mr. Moran, Mr. Cassidy, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Rounds, and Mr. Scott of 
   Florida) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the Administrator of the Small Business Administration from 
   directly making loans under the 7(a) loan program, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Access to Credit for 
Small Businesses Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON DIRECT 7(A) LOANS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any provision of subsection (a) of 
section 7 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a)), the 
Administrator of the Small Business Administration may not directly 
make a loan pursuant to such subsection.
    (b) Existing Loans.--The Administrator of the Small Business 
Administration shall service a direct loan made under section 7(a) of 
the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(b)) if such loan was made before 
the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5681 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5681

 To provide for the approval of the Amendment to the Agreement Between 
 the Government of the United States of America and the Government of 
     the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland for 
 Cooperation on the Uses of Atomic Energy for Mutual Defense Purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 12, 2014

 Mr. Royce (for himself, Mr. Engel, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. Sherman, Mr. 
Poe of Texas, Mr. Cicilline, and Mr. Holding) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the approval of the Amendment to the Agreement Between 
 the Government of the United States of America and the Government of 
     the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland for 
 Cooperation on the Uses of Atomic Energy for Mutual Defense Purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE 
              GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE 
              GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND 
              NORTHERN IRELAND FOR COOPERATION ON THE USES OF ATOMIC 
              ENERGY FOR MUTUAL DEFENSE PURPOSES.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the provisions for congressional 
consideration of a proposed agreement for cooperation in subsection d. 
of section 123 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2153), the 
amendments to the Agreement Between the Government of the United States 
of America and the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain 
and Northern Ireland for Cooperation on the Uses of Atomic Energy for 
Mutual Defense Purposes, done at Washington, July 22, 2014, and 
transmitted to Congress on July 24, 2014, including all portions 
thereof (hereinafter in this section referred to as the ``Amendment''), 
may be brought into effect on or after the date of the enactment of 
this Act as if all the requirements in such section 123 for 
consideration of the Amendment had been satisfied, subject to 
subsection (b) of this section.
    (b) Applicability of Atomic Energy Act of 1954 and Other Provisions 
of Law.--Upon coming into effect, the Amendment shall be subject to the 
provisions of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.) 
and any other applicable United States law as if the Amendment had come 
into effect in accordance with the requirements of section 123 of the 
Atomic Energy Act of 1954.
                                 <all>
```
### Proposed Provision: B3.16. For retired worker and disabled worker beneficiaries becoming initially eligible in January 2030 or later, phase in a new benefit formula (from 2030 to 2039). Replace the existing two primary insurance amount (PIA) bend points with three new bend points as follows:  (1) 25% AWI/12 from 2 years prior to initial eligibility; (2) 100% AWI/12 from 2 years prior to initial eligibility; and (3) 125% AWI/12 from 2 years prior to initial eligibility.  The new PIA factors are 95%, 27.5%, 5% and 2%. During the phase in, those becoming newly eligible for benefits will receive an increasing portion of their benefits based on the new formula, reaching 100% of the new formula in 2039.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7617]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3110]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application to Withdraw From Listing 
and Registration; (Fund American Enterprises Holdings, Inc., Common 
Stock, $1.00 Par Value) File No. 1-8993

February 2, 1995.
    Fund American Enterprises Holdings, Inc. (``Company'') has filed an 
application with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 12(d) of the Securities Exchange 
Act of 1934 (``Act'') and Rule 12d2-2(d) promulgated thereunder, to 
withdraw the above specified security (``Security'') from listing and 
registration on the Pacific Stock Exchange, Inc. (``PSE''). The 
Security will continue to be listed on the New York Stock Exchange 
(``NYSE'').
    The reasons alleged in the application for withdrawing the Security 
from listing and registration include the following: (1) The average 
monthly volume of the Security on the PSE for the past six months has 
been diminutive; (2) it is difficult to justify the expense of the 
annual listing fee; (3) all public documents that the Company files 
must be filed in triplicate to the PSE, resulting in a significant 
amount of labor and other expense associated with the maintenance of 
the PSE listing; and (4) the Company no longer has a West Coast 
business presence or significant ownership base which were important 
considerations in the original listing.
    Any interested person may, on or before February 24, 1995, submit 
by letter to the Secretary of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 
450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549, facts bearing upon whether 
the application has been made in accordance with the rules of the 
exchanges and what terms, if any, should be imposed by the Commission 
for the protection of investors. The Commission, based on the 
information submitted to it, will issue an order granting the 
application after the date mentioned above, unless the Commission 
determines to order a hearing on the matter.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
pursuant to delegated authority.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-3110 Filed 2-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
**EXHIBIT7.1**

**Britannia Bulk Plc**

**Ratio of Earnings to FixedCharges**
| ** **                                             | ** ** | **Years Ended December 31,** | ** ** |
|--------------------------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                                             | ** ** | **2006**                                    | ** ** | **2005** | ** ** | **2004** | ** ** |
| ** **                                             | ** ** | **($ in thousands)**              | ** ** |
| EARNINGS                                               |       |                                        |       |   |   |   |   |
| Pretax income (loss)                                   |       | $                                           | 2,626      |   | $ | 8,560 |   | $ | 7,628 |   |
| Fixed charges (computed  below)                        |       | 5,293                                       |       | 1,537 |   | 435 |   |
| Less capitalized  interest                             |       | 0                                           |       | 0 |   | 0 |   |
| Total adjusted earnings  (A)                           |       | $                                           | 7,919      |   | $ | 10,097 |   | $ | 8,063 |   |
|                                                   |       |                                        |       |   |   |   |   |
| FIXED CHARGES                                          |       |                                        |       |   |   |   |   |
| Interest expensed                                      |       | $                                           | 5,122      |   | $ | 1,353 |   | $ | 271 |   |
| Interest capitalized                                   |       | 0                                           |       | 0 |   | 0 |   |
| Amortization of  borrowing costs                       |       | 171                                         |       | 184 |   | 164 |   |
| Estimate of interest in  rent expense                  |       | 0                                           |       | 0 |   | 0 |   |
| Total fixed charges (B)                                |       | $                                           | 5,293      |   | $ | 1,537 |   | $ | 435 |   |
|                                                   |       |                                        |       |   |   |   |   |
| RATIO OF EARNINGS TO  FIXED CHARGES (A) DIVIDED BY (B) |       | 1.5X                                        |       | 6.6X |   | 18.5X |   |
| Excess Amount                                          |       | $                                           | 2,626      |   | $ | 8,560 |   | $ | 7,628 |   |

 

----
#### MRS. LLOYD V. PARSONS, Widow of Lloyd V. Parsons, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF ASHE COUNTY.

(Filed 19 December, 1930.)

Appeal and Error J d — Where Supreme Court is divided the judgment of the lower court will be affirmed.

Upon division of opinion of the Justices on appeal, one Justice not sitting, the judgment of the lower court will be affirmed, in this case without becoming a precedent.

Appeal by respondent from *Finley, J.,*at August Term, 1930, of Ashe.

Affirmed.

This was an appeal from the North Carolina Industrial Commission, heard on exceptions to an award made by said Commission in favor of *89claimant, widow of Lloyd V. Parsons, deceased, and against the respondent, the board of education of Ashe County. The exceptions were overruled.

From judgment affirming the award of the Commission, respondent appealed to the Supreme Court.

*W. B. Bauguess for claimant.*

*T. G. Bowie for respondent.*

*Attorney-General for Industrial Commission.*

Per Cueiam.

The Court being evenly divided in opinion, *8lacy, O. J.,*not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed and stands as the decision of this case, without becoming a j>recedent. *Gooch v. Western Union Telegraph Co.,*196 N. C., 823, 146 S. E., 803, and cases cited.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.1c


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of SBS Technologies, Inc. ("SBS") on Form
10-K for the year ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James E. Dixon, Jr., Chief
Financial Officer of SBS, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of SBS.



/s/ James E. Dixon, Jr.
-----------------------

James E. Dixon, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer
September 20, 2002
#### AARON R. BROWN and Wife, CARRIE L. BROWN, v. WILL A. MOORE, SAM RASBERRY, JAMES H. LOCUST, NORMAN BATTLE, JOHN KORNEGAY, JESSE KORNEGAY, JAMES KIRKMAN and JOHN LEWIS EXUM, Trustees of ZION CHURCH, AFRICAN METHODIST EPISCOPAL ZION CHURCH IN AMERICA, OF CONTENTNEA TOWNSHIP, LENOIR COUNTY.

(Filed 2 November, 1955.)

Appeal by plaintiffs from *Parker (Joseph W.), J.,*June Term, 1955, LENOIR.

Civil action to nullify report of arbitrators made after plaintiffs had withdrawn their consent, heard on motion to reform consent judgment entered.

This action involves a controversy as to the true dividing line between the land of the plaintiffs and the land of the defendants in which a judgment by consent establishing the true dividing line was entered. Plaintiffs now move to vacate for that they did. not give their “true consent” and the line agreed upon is too indefinite and uncertain to be established on the ground. The court heard the motion, found the facts, and rendered judgment on the facts found, decreeing that the line run by the surveyor under the consent judgment is the true boundary line between the land of the plaintiffs and the land of the defendants, and that the consent judgment is binding upon all parties. Plaintiffs excepted and appealed.

*Albion Dunn for plaintiff appellants.*

*Wallace & Wallace and William F. Sivipson for defendant appellees.*

PeR Curiam.

The court below found the facts, particularly that the line established in said judgment “is not indefinite or ambiguous,” and that the line run by the surveyor “is the true boundary line between the lands of plaintiffs and lands of defendants as set forth in said Consent Judgment.” There is no exception to the findings of fact, and no excep-tive assignment of error presents any question which requires discussion. Therefore, without approving or disapproving the procedure adopted, the judgment entered in the court below is

Affirmed.