alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT MARCH 31, 1999 AND FROM THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENT.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         669,043
<SECURITIES>                                    37,607
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,632
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,310
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               752,381
<PP&E>                                         309,823
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,988
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,123,353
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           85,603
<BONDS>                                        490,625
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           646
<OTHER-SE>                                     546,479
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,123,353
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,722
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,342
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                32,223
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,733
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,456
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (98,252)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (98,252)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (98,252)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.76)


</TABLE>
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 -0.25 -0.26 -7% -6%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

September 15, 2023

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Level of Monthly Benefits

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: B3.11. Increase the first PIA factor from 90 percent to 93 percent for all beneficiaries 

eligible as of January 2025 and for those newly eligible for benefits after 2024.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

         I, Edward B. Rudner, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Online Vacation Center
Holdings Corp.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

            (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

            (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

         5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditor and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

            (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

            (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

 Date: August 14, 2006

/s/ Edward B. Rudner
--------------------
Edward B. Rudner
Chief Executive Officer
** **

 

                                                                              

******** 

******** 

 

 

**** 

Exhibit 32.2

 

**** 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**** 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Washington Banking Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard A. Shields, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:    

 

(1)         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.

 

This certification is being furnished solely to comply with the requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any of the Company’s filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise be deemed to be filed as part of the Report or under such Acts. 

 

 

/s/ Richard A. Shields         

Richard A. Shields 

Chief Financial Officer

 

 

May 7, 2010

 

                                                                               

----
#### STATE v. BOSE FAIN.

(Filed 19 December, 1930.)

Criminal Law G m — Evidence in this case held insufficient- to sustain conviction.

Evidence only that defendant was on friendly terms with a young woman in whose possession stolen property was found is insufficient to convict him of housebreaking, larceny, or receiving stolen goods of which he is charged in the bill of indictment, and nonsuit should have been entered.

Appeal by defendant from *Harwood, Special Judge,*at April Term, 1930, of Cheroiiee.

Reversed.

This is a criminal action in which defendant was tried on an indictment charging housebreaking, larceny and receiving stolen goods, knowing them to have been stolen. There was a verdict of guilty.

From judgment that defendant be confined in the State’s prison for a term of not less than twelve nor more than fifteen months, defendant appealed to the Supreme Court.

*Attorney-General Brwrnnitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.*

*Moody & Moody for defendant.*

Feb Cubiam.

The evidence for the State at the trial of this action tended to show that defendant was seen in the company of a young woman who had in her possession- articles of personal property, which had been stolen. There was no evidence tending to show that defendant had had said property in his possession or that he had given the same to his companion. Evidence tending to show friendly relations between the defendant and the woman, in whose possession the articles were found, was not sufficient to show that defendant broke and entered the store from which the property was stolen, that he had stolen the property or had received the same, knowing it to have been stolen. There was error in the refusal of defendant’s motion for judgment as of non-suit, at the close of the evidence for the State. For this reason the judgment must be

Reversed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7538

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TIAYON KARDELL EVANS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District 

Judge. (2:04-cr-00099-RAJ-1; 2:06-cv-00162-RAJ-JEB)

Submitted: June 17, 2010 Decided: June 23, 2010

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tiayon Kardell Evans, Appellant Pro Se. Sherrie Scott 

Capotosto, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Tiayon Kardell Evans seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order construing his motion to set aside the criminal 

judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2010) and 

dismissing it as successive. The order is not appealable unless 

a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of 

appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006); Reid v. Angelone, 

369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Evans has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 03, 2024.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, May 03, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A24I0169. MICHAEL J. COX, M.D. et al v. DEBORAH CAPRON et al.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

STCV1900293
Exhibit 23.1




Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




We have issued our report dated July 25, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of Daegis Inc. (formerly Unify Corporation) on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2011. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Daegis Inc. (formerly Unify Corporation) on Form S-1 (File No. 333-168282, effective October 7, 2010), on Form S-3 (File No. 333-161645, effective November 12, 2009), on Form S-4 (File No. 333-158848, effective May 14, 2009), and on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-13203, effective October 1, 1996, File No. 333-61705, effective August 18, 1998, File No. 333-92973, effective December 17, 1999, File No. 333-71814, effective October 18, 2001, File No. 333-98633, effective August 23, 2002, File No. 333-120750, effective November 24, 2004, File No. 333-149905, effective March 26, 2008 and File No. 333-169725, effective October 1, 2010).




/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP




Reno, Nevada
July 25, 2011




---
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 10.28

Cayenne Software, Inc.
Roland D. Pampel, Cayenne Director


December 31, 1997



Mr. Peter J. Boni
138 Marlborough Street
Boston, MA  02116


Dear Peter,


Confirming our prior conversations and agreement, the following are the details
of what we agreed to:

Mutual agreement of resignation of employment and from all board and officer
positions of Cayenne and subsidiaries. Peter Boni agreed to participate in the
employee announcement, discussions with analysts and shareholders and in the
preparation of the Press Release.

Terms Agreed to:
All vested ISO option shares as of 12/31/97 will be exercisable for 90 days
after 12/31/97. All non-qualified vested option shares as of 12/31/97 will be
exercisable through the end of July 1998. After July 31, 1998, 300,000 of the
above vested (12/31/97) non-qualified option shares will be exercisable through
the end of year 2000.

Peter Boni will be given one year base salary for the calendar year of 1998; the
base salary of $278,000.00 is the salary to be used. Peter Boni will be given
continuance of medical, dental, insurance benefits and car allowance for one
year, until and including December 31, 1998.

Peter Boni will not compete with the Company for one year. He will not use or
disclose the Company's confidential information. He will not disparage the
Company.

I wish you success in your future endeavors.


Sincerely,

/s/ Roland D. Pampel

Roland D. Pampel
Cayenne Director
OPINION INFORMATION TO PUBLISHERS

	FROM

	COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

CASE DOCKET NUMBER:

2-07-179-CR 

2-07-190-CR

NAME OF CASE:

JORGE CASTILLO ZULAYKA A/K/A JORGE C. ZULAYKA

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

DATE OPINION OR ORDER FILED:

JULY 3, 2008

DATE REHEARING DENIED:

TRIAL COURT:

415TH DISTRICT COURT

TRIAL COURT JUDGE:

HON. R. E. THORNTON

COUNTY:

PARKER

PRO SE:				

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT:

JORGE CASTILLO A/K/A JORGE C. ZULAYKA

MIKE A SMIDDY

MINERAL WELLS, TEXAS

ATTORNEYS FOR STATE:

DON SCHNEBLY DISTRICT ATTORNEY JEFFREY A. SWAIN ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY

PARKER COUNTY, TEXAS
Exhibit 32








CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of American Media, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify that:





This Amendment No.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 (the "Amendment") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Amendment fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ David J. PeckerDavid J. PeckerChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Date:July 29, 2016/s/ Christopher V. PolimeniChristopher V. PolimeniExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)Date:July 29, 2016
a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b.
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;c.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andd.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: August 11, 2008
    By:
    /s/ Martin R. GausvikMartin R. GausvikExecutive Vice President, Treasurer
and
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT  TO 18 U.S.C.  SECTION  1350 AS ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of E Com Ventures,  Inc. (the "Company") of
Form 10-K for the year ending January 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, A. Mark Young, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                                   By:   /s/ A. Mark Young
                                                         ------------------
                                                         A. Mark Young
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                                         May 12, 2004
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 -0.58 -1.04 -16% -24%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

August 1, 2023

Summary Measures and Graphs

Category of Change: Taxation of Benefits

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: H6. Eliminate federal income taxation of OASDI benefits that is credited to the OASI 

and DI Trust Funds for 2054 and later. Phase out OASDI taxation of benefits by increasing relevant 

"income" thresholds from 2045 through 2053 as follows, for single/joint tax filers: (a) 2045 = 

$32,500/$65,000; (b) 2046 = $40,000/$80,000; (c) 2047 = $47,500/$95,000; (d) 2048 = $55,000/$110,000; 

(e) 2049 = $62,500/$125,000; (f) 2050 = $70,000/$140,000; (g) 2051 = $77,500/$155,000; (h) 2052 = 

$85,000/$170,000; and (i) 2053 = $92,500/$185,000. Taxation of benefits revenues for the Hospital 

Insurance (HI) Trust Fund would be maintained at the same level as if the current-law computation applied.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-18-00147-CR

CAMERON MILES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 16th District Court

Denton County, Texas

Trial Court No. F17-418-158

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.
2

O RDER

Our review of the clerk’s record and the reporter’s record in this case indicates that they 

contain “sensitive data” as that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a birth date, a home address, and 

the name of any person who was a minor at the time the offense was committed.” TEX. R. APP. P. 

9.10(a)(3). The clerk’s record and the reporter’s record contain the name of a person who was a 

minor at the time the offense was committed.1

 Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders 

otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with the court, including the contents of any appendices, 

must not contain sensitive data.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(b).

Rule 9.10(g) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper 

form or electronic form, without redaction.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(g). Therefore, because the 

clerk’s record and the reporter’s record contain sensitive data, we order the clerk of this Court or 

her appointee, in accordance with Rule 9.10(g), to seal the electronically filed clerk’s record and 

the reporter’s record. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: March 13, 2019

 1

Originally appealed to the Second Court of Appeals in Fort Worth, this case was transferred to this Court by the 

Texas Supreme Court pursuant to Section 73.001 of the Texas Government Code. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN.

§ 73.001 (West 2013). We are unaware of any conflict between precedent of the Second Court of Appeals and that 

of this Court on any relevant issue. See TEX. R. APP. P. 41.3.