alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 11.1

                       COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE

                       GEORGIA BANK FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                                 AND SUBSIDIARY
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                           Year ended
                                                                          December 31,
                                                    ================     ================    ================
                                                          2001                 2000                1999
                                                    ----------------     ----------------    ----------------
<S>                                                    <C>                  <C>                 <C>
Net income                                             $4,561,004           $4,002,296          $3,969,508

Basic and diluted net income per share:/(1)/
    Weighted average number of common
       shares outstanding                               2,385,280            2,397,327           2,397,327

Basic net income per share                                $1.91                $1.67            $     1.66

    Weighted average number of common
        and common  equivalent shares outstanding       2,389,149            2,398,260           2,397,327

Diluted net income per share                              $1.91                $1.67            $     1.66
</TABLE>

/(1)/ Adjusted on a comparative basis for the 15% stock dividend payable August
      28, 1999 and August 31, 2001.

                                      83
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

_________________

NO. 09-14-00201-CR

_________________

BRUCE WAYNE HARP, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 253rd District Court

Liberty County, Texas

Trial Cause No. CR30729

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

A jury found appellant Bruce Wayne Harp guilty of continuous sexual abuse 

of a child and assessed punishment at thirty-five years imprisonment with the 

Texas Department of Criminal Justice’s Institutional Division. Harp timely filed a 

notice of appeal. 

Harp’s appellate counsel filed an Anders brief. See Anders v. California, 386 

U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 

1978). Counsel’s brief presents his professional evaluation of the record and 
2

concludes there are no arguable grounds to be advanced in this appeal. Counsel 

provided Harp with a copy of the brief. We granted an extension of time for Harp

to file a pro se brief. Harp filed a pro se brief raising a number of issues on appeal. 

The appellate court need not address the merits of issues raised in Anders

briefs or pro se responses. Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim.

App. 2005). In these circumstances, we “may determine that the appeal is wholly 

frivolous and issue an opinion explaining that [the appellate court] has reviewed 

the record and finds no reversible error. Or, [we] may determine that arguable 

grounds for appeal exist and remand the cause to the trial court so that new counsel 

may be appointed to brief the issues.” Id. (citations omitted).

We have independently reviewed the clerk’s record and the reporter’s

record, and we agree with Harp’s appellate counsel that no arguable issues support 

an appeal. See id. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new 

counsel to re-brief Harp’s appeal. See id.; cf. Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 

511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court’s judgment.1

 1 Harp may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for 

discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.
3

AFFIRMED.

_____________________________

 CHARLES KREGER

 Justice

Submitted on September 8, 2015

Opinion Delivered December 9, 2015

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger, and Johnson, JJ.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DARWIN A. DAVIS
, Appellant,

v.

ALICIA C. DAVIS
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 2440

[ September 15, 2021 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Peter Holden , Judge; L.T. Case No. FMCE

- 12

- 010463 (36)

.

Gustavo E. Frances of The Law Office of Gustavo E. Frances, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Ryan C. Tyler and Kimberly L. Boldt of Ratzan, Weissman & Boldt, Boca Raton, for appellee.

P ER C URI AM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE
, K LINGENSMITH and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3304 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3304

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the ability of 
  veterans to electronically submit complaints about the delivery of 
      health care services by the Department of Veterans Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 2, 2021

  Mr. Kennedy (for himself and Mr. Warnock) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the ability of 
  veterans to electronically submit complaints about the delivery of 
      health care services by the Department of Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Patient Advocate Tracker Act''.

SEC. 2. SYSTEM FOR ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION OF COMPLAINTS ABOUT THE 
              DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES BY THE DEPARTMENT OF 
              VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    Section 7309A(c) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(3) Beginning not later than 18 months after the date of the 
enactment of this paragraph, the Director shall establish an 
information technology system that will allow a veteran (or the 
designated representative of a veteran) to electronically--
            ``(A) file a complaint that will be received by the 
        appropriate patient advocate; and
            ``(B) at any time view the status of the complaint, 
        including interim and final actions that have been taken to 
        address the complaint.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 246 (Friday, December 22, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 66547]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31136]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-79-000]


Northwest Alaskan Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

December 18, 1995.
    Take notice that on December 8, 1995, Northwest Alaskan Pipeline 
Company (Northwest Alaskan) tendered for filing to become part of its 
FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 2, the following tariff sheets, to 
become effective January 1, 1996:

Second Revised Sheet No. 1
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 400
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 401
Second Revised Sheet No. 456M
Second Revised Sheet No. 456N
Original Sheet No. 456N.01
Original Sheet No. 456N.02
Original Sheet No. 456N.03

    Northwest Alaskan states that the proposed Rate Schedule X-4 tariff 
revisions reflect a redetermination in accordance with the existing 
contract and tariff of the Index Price from which transportation and 
administrative costs are subtracted to arrive at the Tier I Commodity 
Charge and provide, in summary, as follows:
    (1) A change in the Index Price, from 100 per cent of the average 
spot gas prices for quantities from the San Juan Basin delivered into 
interstate pipeline facilities of El Paso Natural Gas Company (the 
``San Juan Basin Price'') to a combination of 95 percent of the San 
Juan Basin Price and 5 percent of the average spot gas prices for 
quantities from the Permian Basin delivered into interstate pipeline 
facilities of El Paso Natural Gas Company (the ``Permian Basin 
Price'').
    (2) The payment of an Adjustment Amount which reflects the 
difference in price paid using the existing Index Price (i.e., 100% San 
Juan Basin Price) and the price which would have been paid using the 
redetermined Index Price (i.e., San Juan Basin Price and 5% Permian 
Basin Price) for the period from November 1, 1995, to the effective 
time of the tariff change.
    Northwest Alaskan states that it served the filing on Pacific 
Interstate Transmission Company, Pan-Alberta Gas (U.S.), Inc., Pan-
Alberta Gas Ltd. and the California Public Utility Commission.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Secs. 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and 
Regulations. Pursuant to Sec. 154.210 of the Commission's regulations, 
all such motions or protests must be filed not later than 12 days after 
the date of the filing noted above. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-31136 Filed 12-21-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
II 

Calendar No. 174 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3299 

To prohibit the Department of Defense from discharging or withholding 

pay or benefits from members of the National Guard based on COVID– 

19 vaccination status. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 1, 2021 

Mr. LANKFORD introduced the following bill; which was read the first time 

DECEMBER 2, 2021 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Department of Defense from discharging 

or withholding pay or benefits from members of the 

National Guard based on COVID–19 vaccination status. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3299 PCS

1 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON DISCHARGING OR WITH2 HOLDING PAY OR BENEFITS FROM NATIONAL 

3 GUARD MEMBERS BASED ON COVID–19 VAC4 CINATION STATUS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall 

6 not, based on whether or not a member of the National 

7 Guard has received a COVID–19 vaccine, take any of the 

8 following actions: 

9 (1) Involuntarily discharge or discipline the 

10 member under chapter 47 of title 10, United States 

11 Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice). 

12 (2) Withhold pay or benefits from the member. 

13 (3) Prohibit the member from participating in 

14 training or using equipment funded by amounts ap15 propriated by an Act of Congress. 

16 (b) PAY AND BENEFITS INCLUDED.—The pay and 

17 benefits referred to in subsection (a)(2) include the fol18 lowing: 

19 (1) Basic pay and special pay under title 37, 

20 United States Code, or title 10, United States Code. 

21 (2) Medical and dental care under chapter 55 

22 of title 10, United States Code. 

23 (3) Transitional health benefits under section 

24 1145 of such title. 

25 (4) Commissary and exchange benefits under 

26 section 1146 of such title. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 174 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3299 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Department of Defense from disCOVID–19 vaccination status. members of the National Guard based on charging or withholding pay or benefits from 

DECEMBER 2, 2021 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Order entered February 26, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 14 - 01148 - CV GREENWOOD MOTOR LINE S, INC. D/B/A R+L CA RRIERS , ET AL. , Appellant s V. BOBBIE BUSH, Appellee On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Cou rt

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 11 - 16041 - M



### O RDER We GRANT appellee’s February 20, 2015 unopposed second motion for an extension of time to file a brief. Appellee shall file a brief by MARCH 25, 2015 . We caution appellee that no further extension of time will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM (A)
RAINTREE RESORTS  INTERNATIONAL,  INC. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
PERIOD  ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH (B) FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001058736
<NAME>                        RAINTREE RESORTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                           5,111
<SECURITIES>                                     3,587
<RECEIVABLES>                                   78,906
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (8,560)
<INVENTORY>                                        763
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               108,924
<PP&E>                                           7,040
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (2,026)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 152,745
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,377
<BONDS>                                         93,760
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            5,148
<PREFERRED>                                      2,078
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                     (15,906)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   152,745
<SALES>                                         18,010
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,432
<CGS>                                            4,218
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,090
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,579
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,420
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,357
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (313)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        40
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (353)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (353)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.04)



</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES -OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Belden & Blake Corporation (the Company) on Form
10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated
below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the knowledge of the undersigned:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: March 30, 2006

/s/
Mark A. HouserMark A. Houser, Chief Executive Officer andChairman of the Board of Directors This certification
accompanies the Form 10-K/A and shall not be treated as having been filed as part
of the Form 10-K/A.
Susquehanna Atlas
        -  GIS Data & Base Maps            - Congressional Districts
          - Level III Ecoregions
          - Elevation
          - Geology
          - HUC 10 Watersheds
          - Land Use Land Cover
          - Major Watersheds
          - Natural Gas Shales
          - Physiographic Sections
          - Precipitation
          - Recreation
          - State Representative Districts
          - State Senatorial Districts
          - STATSGO Soils 
        -  Basinwide Project Links            - Continuous Instream Monitoring
          - Cumulative Water Use & Availability
          - Hydrologic Conditions Monitor
          - Mine Drainage Poral
          - Sediment and Nutrient Assessment Program
          - Water Application & Approval Viewer
          - Water Quality Index 
        -  GIS Factsheet 
        -  GIS Lookup 
        -  Story Maps & Dashboards 
        -  SRBC 

Tools            -  ** ZoomToggle Dropdown-  Cities 
-  Legislative Districts 
-  Political Boundaries 
-  Watersheds 
** Clear 

          -  Commission Programs & Activities 
          -      Sediment and Nutrient Assessment Program (SNAP) 
          -      Fish Passage Facilities 
          -      Assessment of Interstate Streams 
          -      Large River Assessment 
          -      Tioga River Restoration 
          -      West Branch Mine Drainage Remediation Strategy 
          -      Consumptive Use Priority Areas 
          -      Potentially Stressed Areas 
          -      Anthracite Region Mine Drainage Remediation Strategy 
          -    Continuous Instream Monitoring Network      Active Drainage Area      Historical Drainage Area 
          -      Watershed Studies 
          -      Map Packages 
          -      Lower Susquehanna River Source Water Protection Partnership 
          -      Flood Warning Systems 
          -  Groundwater Recharge Locations      **  Highest Groundwater Recharge Potential (Highest Quantile)**    High**  Groundwater Recharge Potential (Quantiles)**    High    Above Average    Average    Below Average    Low 
          -    Subbasin Surveys - Year 1      Chemung      Juniata      Lower Susquehanna      Middle Susquehanna      Upper Susquehanna      West Branch Susquehanna 

#### City Bookmarks

#### Legislative District Zoom

#### County & Municipal Boundary Zoom

*(optional):*

#### Watershed Boundary Zoom

*(optional):*

#### Map Thumbnails - name this with the project and region

#### Groundwater Recharge

**Recharge Potential in the Susquehanna River Basin**

----

**Highest Recharge Potential in the Susquehanna River Basin**

**Webpage:**Identifying Optimal Groundwater Recharge Locations

**Report:**Identifying Optimal Groundwater Recharge Locations

**Fact Sheet:**Download
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

The Board of Directors 

Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation: 

 

We consent to incorporation herein by reference of our report dated October 28, 2004, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Vitesse SemiconductorCorporation and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive loss and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30,2004, and the related schedule, which report appears in the September 30, 2004, annual report on Form 10-K of Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation. 

 

/s/    KPMG LLP 

 

Los Angeles, California 

December 9, 2004
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Donald M. Muir, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Lionbridge Technologies, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for theregistrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared; 

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles; 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: November 9, 2007
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Office of the Chief Actuary | Single-Year Tables Consistent with 2005 OASDI Trustees ReportUpdated March 23, 2005      Historical document   |
|-----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|