alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Stephen J. Lifshatz, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Lionbridge Technologies, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; 

 

(b) Designed such internalcontrol over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date:August 5, 2005
Major General Javier A. Reina serves as the Deputy Commander for 

Mobilization and Reserve Affairs, U.S. Southern Command, Doral, 

Florida. He is the principal advisor for reserve matters to the 

commander providing oversight on manpower, personnel and 

administrative functions to maximize the effective integration of the 

Reserve Component in support of the Combatant Commander's theater 

campaign plan.

 Major General Reina joined the Army in 1982. Following enlisted 

service with the 82nd Airborne Division and the 1/11th Special Forces 

Group (Airborne), he was commissioned through the Rutgers University 

Army Reserve Officer Training Corps program in 1989. 

Javier Alexander Reina

Major General, United States Army National Guard

Deputy Commander for Mobilization and Reserve Affairs

U.S. Southern Command

 His education includes a Bachelor of Science Degree in Electrical Engineering from Rutgers University, a 

Master's Degree in Business Administration from Bryant University, and a Master's Degree in Strategic 

Studies from the U.S. Army War College.

 Major General Reina has served in various key leadership, command, and operational assignments. Upon 

joining the Rhode Island National Guard in 1993, he was assigned as a Platoon Leader 115th MP Co. and 

later served as the Law and Order Operations Officer 118th MP BN. He served briefly in the Hawaii National 

Guard as the Logistics Officer HHC 29th IN BDE, and returned to Rhode Island as the Commander 115th MP 

Co.. Other Key assignments include Logistics Officer S4 43D MP BDE, Operations Officer S3 43D MP BDE, 

Commander 118th MP BN, Commander 43D MP BDE, and Land Component Commander. He most recently 

served as the Assistant Adjutant General - Army, Rhode Island National Guard. 

 Major General Reina is a veteran of two deployments: in 2002 as the Plans Officer Joint Task Force 160 

(Guantanamo Bay Cuba), and in 2005 as the Logistics Officer S4 43D MP BDE (Baghdad Iraq). Throughout his 

career, BG Reina has earned various personal, joint, unit, service, and campaign awards. 

 His personal decorations include the Legion of Merit with 1 Bronze Oak Leaf Cluster, Bronze Star Medal, 

Meritorious Service Medal with 3 Bronze Oak Leaf Clusters, Joint Service Commendation Medal, Army 

Commendation Medal and the Army Achievement Medal with 1 Bronze Oak Leaf Clusters.

 In his civilian capacity, Major General Reina works for the Department of the Navy as a Defense Security 

Cooperation Management professional, supporting the planning, management, and execution of Foreign 

Military Sales (FMS) cases with international strategic partner nations, for the procurement and 

implementation of undersea defensive systems. Major General Reina and his wife Maria are the proud 

parents of Ryan and Allie.
#### STATE v. GEORGE CECIL COOK, JR.

(Filed 6 March, 1957.)

Criminal Law § 53n: Homicide § 27i—

In a prosecution for murder in the first degree, it is required that the court instruct the jury not only as to their right to recommend life imprisonment, but he must also instruct the jury as to the effect of such recommendation. G.S. 14-17.

*611Appeal by defendant from *Campbell, J.,*November Term, 1956, of CLEVELAND.

Criminal prosecution on bill of indictment charging defendant with the murder of D. Z. Hollomon.

The record shows: “VeRDICt: The Jury returns, in open Court, a verdict of Guilty.”

Thereupon, the court, reciting therein that defendant had been indicted, tried and convicted by jury “for Murder in the First Degree of D. Z. Hollomon,” entered judgment imposing d.eath sentence, from which defendant appealed.

*Attorney-General Patton and Assistant Attorney-General Bruton for the State.*

*C. C. Horn and A. A. Powell for defendant, appellant.*

PeR Curiam.

The theory of the State’s case was that of murder committed in the perpetration or attempt to perpetrate the felony of robbery. The jury were instructed that they might return a verdict of guilty of murder in the first degree, or a verdict of guilty of murder in the first degree with recommendation of life imprisonment, or a verdict of not guilty.

As in *S. v. Carter,*243 N.C. 106, 89 S.E. 2d 789, and *S. v. Adams,*243 N.C. 290, 90 S.E. 2d 383, the court failed to instruct the jury as to the legal effect under G.S. 14-17 of a verdict of guilty of murder in the first degree with recommendation of life imprisonment, namely, that such verdict would require that the court pronounce thereon a judgment of life imprisonment. The Attorney-General, with commendable frankness, concedes that the *Carter*and *Adams cases*control decision. The failure to comply with the mandatory provisions of G.S. 14-17 necessitates a new trial.

Since there must be a new trial for the reasons stated, we do not discuss the sufficiency uf the verdict as recorded to support a judgment imposing a death sentence. In that connection, reference is made to *S. v. Matthews,*142 N.C. 621, 55 S.E. 342, and *S. v. Bazemore,*193 N.C. 336, 137 S.E. 172; also, G.S. 15-172.

New trial.
(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
 /s/ Lewis W. Dickey, Jr.Name:
    Lewis W. Dickey, Jr.Title:
    Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer/s/ Martin R. GausvikName:
    Martin R. GausvikTitle:
    Executive Vice President, Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer   32
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6546
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SAMUEL L. HUCKS, JR., a/k/a Junie Boy, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:98-cr-00047-JBF) Submitted: September 28, 2006 Decided: October 6, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Samuel L. Hucks, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert J. Groner, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Samuel L. Hucks, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hucks , No. 2:98-cr-00047-JBF (E.D. Va. Jan. 24, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### CHESTER B. McLEOD v. MARY STUDEBAKER McLEOD.

(Filed 22 March, 1944.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *Frizzelle, J.,*at April Term, 1943, of WayNe.

*856Civil action for absolute divorce upon ground of two years separation, beard upon motion, under Gr. S., 1-220, formerly O. S., 600, to set aside judgment rendered herein at February Term, 1943, of Wayne. But it appearing upon the face of the record that affidavit for publication of notice of summons is fatally defective for that it fails to state that “defendant cannot, after due diligence, be found in the State,” the court being of opinion that the trial court acquired no jurisdiction over defendant and that hence the judgment rendered in the action is void, so adjudged, and vacated and annulled the judgment to which the motion related.

Plaintiff appeals therefrom to Supreme Court and assigns error.

*J. Faison Thomson for plaintiff, appellant.*

*Olaude C. Canaday for defendant, appellee.*

Per Curiam.

The record fails to show error in the judgment below. G. S., 1-98, formerly C. S., 484. *Denton v. Vassiliades,*212 N. C., 513, 193 S. E., 737.

Affirmed.
| 1.     | Such      Yearly Report of Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2007, fully      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                  |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     | The      information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for the year      ended December 31, 2007, fairly represents in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of Wellentech Services,      Inc. |

| Date:      March 31, 2008                       |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                            |
|  Wellentech      Services, Inc.       |
|                                            |
| By:      /s/      Irwin Rapoport                |
| Irwin      RapoportChief      Executive Officer |
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# MARFORCYBER/MARFORSPACE/MCIC Change of Command

By Sgt. Madison SantamariaDefense Media Activity - Marines

                FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Maryland  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 16

- 00351

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF C .A. AND C.A., CHILDR EN

From the County Court at Law No

. 1

Brazos County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14

- 002766

- CV

- CCL1

ORDER

Appellant’s Emergency Motion for Relief is denied.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis , and

Justice Scoggins

Order issued and filed July 26, 2017

Do not publish
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BAKER 

&

HOSTETLER LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

Exhibit C

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4504-3 Filed: 10/29/19 Entered: 10/29/19 12:10:31 Page 1

of 2
In re PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company 

Lead Case NO. I 9-30088 

Official Committee of Tort Claimants 

COMMITTEE EXPENSE FORM 

1. Name of Committee Member: 

2. Description of Committee Business: 

3. Date of Committee Business: 

4. Location of Committee Business: 

5. Date of Travel 

Description of trip ( start/end locations) 

6. Reimbursable Expenses: 

(a) Transportation: 

(1) Air or Rail Fare 

(2) Personal automobile miles at$ .58 per mile 

Total miles traveled: 295 miles 

Yuba City to San Francisco to Yuba City 

(3) Taxi/Uber/Lyft/Public Transportation/Bart 

(4) Parking 

Tolls 

9/26 - $ 7.00 

9/27 - $ 6.00 

(5) Other 

(b) Lodging: 

(1) HoteJ (excluding meals) 

(c) Meals 

(1) Break.fast September 27, 2019 - $ 11.00 

(2) Dinner - September 26, 2019 $ 14.99 

September 27, 2019 - $20.18 

TOTAL REIMBURSEMENT SOUGHT 

Karen M. Lockhart 

In-person Committee Meeting 

September 27, 2019 

San Francisco, CA 

September 26, 2019 to September 27, 2019 

Yuba City to San Francisco to Yuba City 

$ 171.10 

$ 77.52 

$ 13.00 

$ 5.00 

$46.17 

$ 312.79 

Please Attach Backup for Each Item Sought (Receipts, Starring and Ending Location for Mileage, etc)* 

I hereby certify that the above expenses were incurred by me in connection with attendance at a 

Committee meeting or other authorized Comm· ee business. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4504-3 Filed: 10/29/19 Entered: 10/29/19 12:10:31 Page 2

of 2
----

|   | /s/ Westley V.      Thompson                        |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Westley      V. Thompson                                                                                                                                               |
|   | President,      SLF U.S.                                                                                                                                               |
|   | (principal      executive officer)                                                                                                                                     |
|   | August      13, 2009                                                                                                                                                   |

----
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7584]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3049]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Clean Water 
Act

    In accordance with Departmental policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that a proposed amendment to the consent decree in United 
States v. Kodiak Reduction, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. A92-750, was 
lodged on January 25, 1995 with the United States District Court for 
the District of Alaska. The complaint in this case alleged claims 
arising out of the discharge of seafood processing waste into waters 
off Kodiak Island, Alaska. The decree provides for construction and 
operation of a fishmeal plant to process these waters. The proposed 
amendment will establish additional effluent limitations and operating 
conditions on this plant.
    Because the plant is needed to process waste in the fishing season 
due to begin at the end of January, the Department of Justice will 
receive, for a period of ten (10) days from the date of this 
publication, comments relating to the proposed amendment. Comments 
should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General for the 
Environment and Natural Resources Division, Department of Justice, 
Washington, D.C. 20530, and should refer to United States v. Kodiak 
Reduction, Inc., et al., DOJ Ref. #90-5-1-1-3620.
    The proposed amendment may be examined at the office of the United 
States Attorney, 222 W. 7th Ave., Anchorage, Alaska, the Region 10 
Office of the Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Sixth Avenue, 
Seattle, Washington and at the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, 
N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005, (202) 624-0892. A copy of the 
proposed consent decree may be obtained in person or by mail from the 
Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, 
D.C. 20005. In requesting a copy please refer to the referenced case 
and enclose a check in the amount of $2.25 payable to the Consent 
Decree Library.
Bruce Gelber,
Acting Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 95-3049 Filed 2-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5614 

To reauthorize the United States Anti-Doping Agency, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 

Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio (for himself and Mr. TONKO) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the United States Anti-Doping Agency, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘United States Anti5 Doping Agency Reauthorization Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBIT PERFORMANCE-ENHANCING METHODS. 

7 Section 701 of title VII of the Office of National 

8 Drug Control Policy Reauthorization Act of 2006 (21 

9 U.S.C. 2001) is amended— 

10 (1) in subsection (a), by striking paragraph (4); 

11 and 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5614 IH

1 (2) in subsection (b)— 

2 (A) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘and be 

3 recognized worldwide as the independent na4 tional anti-doping organization for the United 

5 States’’ after ‘‘Committee’’; 

6 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘, or per7 formance-enhancing genetic modifications ac8 complished through gene-doping’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘or prohibited performance-enhancing methods 

10 adopted by the Agency’’; 

11 (C) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘, or per12 formance-enhancing genetic modifications ac13 complished through gene-doping’’ and inserting 

14 ‘‘or prohibited performance-enhancing methods 

15 adopted by the Agency’’; 

16 (D) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘and the 

17 prevention of use of performance-enhancing 

18 drugs, or performance-enhancing genetic modi19 fications accomplished through gene-doping by 

20 United States amateur athletes; and’’ and in21 serting ‘‘, and the prevention of use by United 

22 States amateur athletes of performance-enhanc23 ing drugs or prohibited performance-enhancing 

24 methods adopted by the Agency.’’; and 

25 (E) by striking paragraph (5). 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5614 IH

1 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

2 Section 703 of title VII of the Office of National 

3 Drug Control Policy Reauthorization Act of 2006 (21 

4 U.S.C. 2003) is amended to read as follows: 

5 ‘‘SEC. 703. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

6 ‘‘There are authorized to be appropriated to the 

7 United States Anti-Doping Agency— 

8 ‘‘(1) for fiscal year 2014, $11,300,000; 

9 ‘‘(2) for fiscal year 2015, $11,700,000; 

10 ‘‘(3) for fiscal year 2016, $12,300,000; 

11 ‘‘(4) for fiscal year 2017, $12,900,000; 

12 ‘‘(5) for fiscal year 2018, $13,500,000; 

13 ‘‘(6) for fiscal year 2019, $14,100,000; and 

14 ‘‘(7) for fiscal year 2020, $14,800,000.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 244 (Wednesday, December 20, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 65695]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30895]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Determination of Quarterly Rate of Excise Tax for Railroad 
Retirement Supplemental Annuity Program

    In accordance with directions in Section 3221(c) of the Railroad 
Retirement Tax Act (26 U.S.C., Section 3221(c)), the Railroad 
Retirement board has determined that the excise tax imposed by such 
Section 3221(c) on every employer, with respect to having individuals 
in his employ, for each work-hour for which compensation is paid by 
such employer for services rendered to him during the quarter beginning 
January 1, 1996, shall be at the rate of 34 cents.
    In accordance with directions in Section 15(a) of the Railroad 
Retirement Act of 1974, the Railroad Retirement Board has determined 
that for the quarter beginning January 1, 1996, 34.6 percent of the 
taxes collected under Sections 3211(b) and 3221(c) of the Railroad 
Retirement Tax Act shall be credited to the Railroad Retirement Account 
and 65.4 percent of the taxes collected under such Sections 3211(b) and 
3221(c) plus 100 percent of the taxes collected under Section 3221(d) 
of the Railroad Retirement Tax Act shall be credited to the Railroad 
Retirement Supplemental Account.

    Dated: December 14, 1995.

    By Authority of the Board.
Beatrice Ezerski,
Secretary to the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-30895 Filed 12-19-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-M