62430 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 234 / Wednesday, December 6, 1995 / Notices

estimated deliveries for these facilities

is 5,000 Mcf daily with a peak day

estimate of 10,000 Mcf per day. Koch

Gateway proposes to make natural gas

deliveries under its ITS Rate Schedule.

Koch Gateway further states that the

service would not have an impact on its

curtailment plan because the proposed

service is interruptible in nature.

Koch Gateway further states that the

estimated cost of the proposed facilities

is $29,200. It is stated that Shell would

reimburse Koch Gateway for the cost of

the construction of the facilities.

Comment date: January 12, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph G

at the end of this notice.

6. Williams Natural Gas Company

[Docket No. CP96–80–000]

Take notice that on November 21,

1995, Williams Natural Gas Company

(WNG), One Williams Center, P.O. Box

3288, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74101, filed in

Docket No. CP96–80–000, a request

pursuant to §§ 157.205 and 157.216(b)

of the Commission’s Regulations under

the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205

and 157.216(b)) for authorization to

abandon, by reclaim, measuring and

appurtenant facilities originally

installed for the delivery of sales gas to

(1) Missouri Gas Energy in Jasper

County, Missouri; (2) Childress Mine

and Quarry in Jasper County, Missouri;

(3) Sabreliner Corp. in Newton County,

Missouri; and (4) NEO Hospital in Craig

County, Oklahoma, under WNG’s

blanket authorization issued in Docket

No. CP82–479–000, pursuant to Section

7(c) of the Natural Gas Act, all as more

fully set forth in the request which is on

file with the Commission and open to

public inspection.

WNG states that all of the affected

customers have agreed to the reclaim of

the facilities. WNG further states the

total estimated reclaim costs are $5,460

with an estimated salvage value of $0.

WNG states it has sent a copy of this

filing to the Missouri Public Service

Commission and the Oklahoma

Corporation Commission.

Comment date: January 12, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph G

at the end of this notice.

7. Williams Natural Gas Company

[Docket No. CP96–82–000]

Take notice that on November 22,

1995, Williams Natural Gas Company

(WNG), P.O. Box 3288, Tulsa, Oklahoma

74101, filed in Docket No. CP96–82–000

a request pursuant to §§ 157.205,

157.212 and 157.216 of the

Commission’s Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205,

157.212 and 157.216) for authorization

to relocate and install new metering and

appurtenant facilities for Farmland

Industries, Inc. (Farmland) and to

abandon by sale to Farmland the old

meter and regulator settings and

approximately 515 feet of 8-inch lateral

pipeline all located in Douglas County,

Kansas, under WNG’s blanket certificate

issued in Docket No. CP82–479–000

pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas

Act, all as more fully set forth in the

request that is on file with the

Commission and open to public

inspection.

WNG states the facilities were

installed in 1963 to deliver sales gas to

Farmland and do not currently meet the

standard design specifications

established by the American National

Standards Institute and the American

Petroleum Institute.

WNG states that it proposes to install

a dual run 8-inch meter setting and

appurtenant facilities approximately

400 feet north of the existing facilities.

WNG states that installing the facilities

at the new location will remove them

from beneath high voltage power lines,

and that the new metering facilities will

be in compliance with established

industry standards. WNG also states that

the new location will eliminate the need

for WNG employees to pass through

Farmland’s security to access WNG’s

facilities.

WNG states the current volume of gas

flowing through the facilities is 78.5

MMcf on a peak day and 17,000 MMcf

annually. WNG states that it does not

anticipate any change in volume as a

result of the proposed replacement.

WNG estimates the construction cost

of its proposal to be $150,660. WNG

states that since the meter and regulator

settings and the pipeline will be sold in

place to Farmland, there is no reclaim

cost associated with this project.

WNG submits that this proposal will

not significantly affect a sensitive

environmental area.

Comment date: January 12, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph G

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

F. Any person desiring to be heard or

to make any protest with reference to

said application should on or before the

comment date, file with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission,

Washington, DC 20426, a motion to

intervene or a protest in accordance

with the requirements of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211)

and the Regulations under the Natural

Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). All protests

filed with the Commission will be

considered by it in determining the

appropriate action to be taken but will

not serve to make the protestants parties

to the proceeding. Any person wishing

to become a party to a proceeding or to

participate as a party in any hearing

therein must file a motion to intervene

in accordance with the Commission’s

Rules.

Take further notice that, pursuant to

the authority contained in and subject to

the jurisdiction conferred upon the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

by Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas

Act and the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure, a hearing will

be held without further notice before the

Commission or its designee on this

application if no motion to intervene is

filed within the time required herein, if

the Commission on its own review of

the matter finds that a grant of the

certificate and/or permission and

approval for the proposed abandonment

are required by the public convenience

and necessity. If a motion for leave to

intervene is timely filed, or if the

Commission on its own motion believes

that a formal hearing is required, further

notice of such hearing will be duly

given.

Under the procedure herein provided

for, unless otherwise advised, it will be

unnecessary for applicant to appear or

be represented at the hearing.

G. Any person or the Commission’s

staff may, within 45 days after the

issuance of the instant notice by the

Commission, file pursuant to Rule 214

of the Commission’s Procedural Rules

(18 CFR 385.214) a motion to intervene

or notice of intervention and pursuant

to § 157.205 of the Regulations under

the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a

protest to the request. If no protest is

filed within the time allowed therefore,

the proposed activity shall be deemed to

be authorized effective the day after the

time allowed for filing a protest. If a

protest is filed and not withdrawn

within 30 days after the time allowed

for filing a protest, the instant request

shall be treated as an application for

authorization pursuant to Section 7 of

the Natural Gas Act.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–29642 Filed 12–5–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[FRL–5340–2]

Prevention of Significant Deterioration

of Air Quality (PSD) Final

Determinations

AGENCY: United States Environmental

Protection Agency.
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 234 / Wednesday, December 6, 1995 / Notices 62431

ACTION: Notice of final actions.

SUMMARY: The purpose of this notice is

to announce that between May 1, 1994

and September 30, 1995, the United

States Environmental Protection Agency

(EPA) Region II Office, issued 5 final

determinations, the New Jersey

Department of Environmental Protection

issued 3 final determinations and the

New York State Department of

Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC)

issued 10 final determinations pursuant

to the Prevention of Significant

Deterioration of Air Quality (PSD)

regulations codified at 40 CFR § 52.21.

DATES: The effective dates for the above

determinations are delineated in the

following chart (See SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Frank Jon of the Permitting and Toxics

Support Section, Air Compliance

Branch, Division of Air and Waste

Management, U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, Region II Office, 290

Broadway, 21st Floor, New York, New

York 10007–1866, (212) 637–4085.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant

to the PSD regulations, the EPA Region

II and the NYSDEC have made final PSD

determinations relative to the sources

listed below:

Name Location Project Agency Final action Date

Eli Lilly Industries, Inc..Mayaguez,

Puerto Rico.

Proposed replacement of a steam boiler at the

Mayaguez facility with a new 350 horsepower

Cleaver Brooks boiler.

EPA ................. PSD Non-Applicability.May 4, 1994.

Mercer and Atlantic County

RRF.

Duck Island,

New Jersey.

Two—833.8 tons per day MSW combustors

each. Each combustor will be equipped with

scrubber, baghouse, and carbon injection.

NJDEP ............. Final PSD Permit.June 22, 1994.

Sithe Independence.Oswego, New

York.

1012 MW combined-cycle gas turbine (4 GE

Frame 7001FA) cogeneration project firing

natural gas.

NYSDEC ......... PSD Permit

Modification.

June 29, 1994.

Selkirk Cogeneration Partners, L.P.

(Phase I).

Selkirk, New

York.

80 MW GE Frame 7 QC cogeneration project

firing natural gas with No. 2 distillate oil and

propane as a backup fuel.

NYSDEC ......... PSD Permit

Modification.

July 15, 1994.

Virgin Islands

Water and

Power Authority

(VIWAPA)

(Units 15 &

18).

St. Thomas,

Virgin Islands.

Relaxation of certain ‘‘low-load’’ restrictions for

two existing oil-fired gas turbines (Units 15

and 18); deleting conditions prohibiting facility

to operate only one of these units in combined-cycle mode at any given time; and allowing facility to burn up to 200,000 gallons

per year of ‘‘off-spec’’ oil in two existing

steam boilers (Units 11 and 13).

EPA ................. PSD Permit

Modification.

August 24, 1994.

New Jersey

Steel Corporation.

Sayreville, New

Jersey.

Facility modernized its batch operation to a continuous feed Consteel process including a

new larger baghouse, new canopy hood, new

higher stack, and higher production rate.

NJDEP ............. PSD Permit

Modification.

September 7, 1994.

LaFarge Corp .. Syracuse, New

York.

Proposed modifications to an existing pneumatic

vessel unload system and an internal transfer/

silo distribution system.

NYSDEC ......... PSD Non-Applicability.September 21,

1994.

Virgin Islands

Water and

Power Authority

(VIWAPA)

(Unit 20).

St. Croix, Virgin

Islands.

Revision to allow Unit 20 to begin operating for

a period of up to 180 days prior to date of installation of PSD-required CEMS.

EPA ................. PSD Permit

Modification.

November 16,

1994.

Saranac Power

Partners.

Plattsburgh,

New York.

240 MW combined-cycle gas turbine cogeneration project firing natural gas.NYSDEC ......... PSD Permit

Modification.

November 23,

1994.

Kamine Syracuse Cogeneration

Project.

Syracuse, New

York.

80 MW Siemens V64 firing natural gas with No.

2 distillate oil as a backup fuel.

NYSDEC ......... PSD Permit

Modification.

December 20,

1994.

Kenetech Energy Systems.Chateaugay,

New York.

20 MW Riley Stoker Boiler firing wood ............... NYSDEC ......... PSD Permit

Modification.

December 30,

1994.

Hollingsworth

and Vose

Company.

Easton, New

York.

Addition of a new paper machine and the increased use of the boilers at an existing facility.NYSDEC ......... PSD Non-Applicability.March 29, 1995.

Newark Bay

Cogeneration.

Newark, New

Jersey.

Authorized an increase in the duration of the exemption for fuel transfer periods.NJDEP ............. PSD Permit

Modification.

April 11, 1995.

LifeSavers

Manufacturing, Inc.

Las Piedras,

Puerto Rico.

Removal of a GMT generator and a Clayton

boiler with the addition of two new Cleaver

Brooks boilers.

EPA ................. PSD Non-Applicability.May 8, 1995.

Brooklyn Navy

Yard Cogen

Partners.

Brooklyn, New

York.

Change in offset host from Domino Sugar to

LILCO.

NYSDEC ......... PSD Permit

Modification.

June 6, 1995.

Auburn Steel

Company.

Auburn, New

York.

Increase in hourly charging rate of the electric

arc furnace from 55 to 85 tons of scrap metal/

hour. Applicant has proposed to install a new

larger baghouse and an annual production

cap to ensure that increases at the proposed

project are below the PSD de minimis levels.

NYSDEC ......... PSD Non-Applicability.July 3, 1995.
62432 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 234 / Wednesday, December 6, 1995 / Notices

Name Location Project Agency Final action Date

Virgin Islands

Water and

Power Authority

(VIWAPA)

Unit #21.

St. Thomas,

Virgin Islands.

New Unit # 21 at the Krum Bay Generating Station in St. Thomas. It is a 36 MW, simple

cycle, oil-fired, GE Frame 6, gas turbine. It

will burn No. 2 fuel oil with a maximum sulfur

content of 0.2 percent by weight.

EPA ................. Final PSD Permit.August 15, 1995.

Brystol-Myers

Squibb Co.

Syracuse, New

York.

Construction of three air pollution sources (biogas boiler, ground flare, and an odor scrubber). All criteria pollutants capped below the

PSD de minimis levels.

NYSDEC ......... PSD Non-Applicability.September 29,

1995.

This notice lists only the sources that

have received final PSD determinations.

Anyone who wishes to review these

determinations and related materials

should contact the following offices:

EPA Actions

United States Environmental Protection

Agency, Region II Office, Air

Compliance Branch—21 Floor, 290

Broadway, New York, New York

10007–1866

NJDEP Actions

New Jersey Department of

Environmental Protection and Energy,

Division of Environmental Quality,

Bureau of Engineering and

Technology, 401 East State Street,

Trenton, New Jersey 08625

NYSDEC Actions

New York State Department of

Environmental Conservation, Division

of Air Resources, Source Review and

Regional Support Section, 50 Wolf

Road, Albany, New York 12233–0001

If available pursuant to the

Consolidated Permit Regulations (40

CFR § 124), judicial review of these

determinations under Section 307(b)(1)

of the Clean Air Act (the Act) may be

sought only by the filing of a petition for

review in the United States Court of

Appeals for the appropriate circuit

within 60 days from the date on which

these determinations are published in

the Federal Register. Under Section

307(b)(2) of the Act, these

determinations shall not be subject to

later judicial review in civil or criminal

proceedings for enforcement.

Dated: October 30, 1995.

William Muszynski,

Deputy Regional Administrator.

[FR Doc. 95–29738 Filed 12–05–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

[FRL–5339–6]

Clean Air Act; Contractor Access to

Confidential Business Information

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: In accordance with 40 CFR

2.301(h)(2) EPA has determined that

Trandes Corporation requires access, on

a need-to-know basis, to CBI materials

submitted to EPA under Title II, Section

208, of the Clean Air Act (CAA). This

access is necessary to this contractor’s

performance under EPA contract

number 68–W6–001.

DATES: The transfer of such data to this

EPA contractor will occur no sooner

than December 11, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Clifford D. Tyree, Project Manager/

Freedom of Information Act Officer,

Certification Division, Ann Arbor, MI,

48105, telephone (313) 668–4310.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title II of

the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires that

manufacturers of light-duty vehicles,

light-duty trucks, heavy-duty engines,

and motorcycles meet applicable

exhaust emission standards. Section 208

of the CAA requires these manufacturers

to provide ‘‘* * * such information as

the Administrator may reasonably

require * * *.’’ Because this

information is collected under Section

208 of the Act, EPA possesses the

authority to disclose said information to

its authorized representatives. EPA

provides a recommended application

format identifying the information

needed to support their assertions that

their vehicles/engines comply with the

applicable emission standards. Each

manufacturer is required to submit an

application for certification for a

certificate of conformity to the

applicable regulations. These data

include vehicle descriptions, engine/

vehicle descriptions, emission control

system descriptions and calibrations,

and sales information. Under contract

No. 68–W6–0001 Trandes Corporation

will provide computer data entry and

computer application operational

services for the Certification Division to

process the data submitted by the

manufacturers to support their

respective exhaust emission and fuel

economy programs. This contractor’s

responsibility is to maintain the

integrity of the transfer of these data. In

order to perform this function the

contractor may, on a need-to-know

basis, have access to these data. The

contractor’s address is: Trandes

Corporation, 4601 Presidents Drive,

Suite 360, Lanham, MD 20706.

This contract will prohibit the use of

the information for any purpose not

specified in the contract; will prohibit

the disclosure, in any form, to a third

party; and will require that each official

and employee of the contractor with

access to the confidential information

sign an agreement to protect the

information from unauthorized release

or access.

Dated: November 15, 1995.

Mary Nichols,

Assistant Administrator, for Air and

Radiation.

[FR Doc. 95–29743 Filed 12–05–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

[FRL–5338–6]

Office of Environmental Justice; Small

Grants Program; Solicitation Notice for

Fiscal Year (FY) 1996 Environmental

Justice Small Grants to CommunityBased/Grassroots Organizations and

Tribal Governments

Purpose of the Grants Program

The purpose of this grants program is

to provide financial assistance to

eligible community groups (i.e.,

community-based/grassroots

organizations, churches, or other nonprofit organizations) and federally

recognized tribal governments that are

working on or plan to carry out projects

to address environmental justice issues.

While state and local governments and

academic institutions are eligible to

receive grants, preference will be given

to community-based/grassroots

organizations that are non-profit and

incorporated, and federally recognized

tribal governments. Funds can be used

to develop a new activity or

substantially improve the quality of

existing programs.