alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         856,914
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  149,010
<ALLOWANCES>                                    44,000
<INVENTORY>                                    796,604
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,766,148
<PP&E>                                         102,930
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,697
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,542,089
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           73,802
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,031
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,530,058
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,542,089
<SALES>                                         21,753
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,311
<CGS>                                            6,562
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,562
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               292,209
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,043
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (271,503)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (271,503)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   271,503
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)


</TABLE>
Order entered September 2, 2014 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00947-CV 

IN RE COLONY INSURANCE COMPANY, Relator 

Original Proceeding from the 429th Judicial District Court 

Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 429-00871-2014 

ORDER 

Based on the Court’s opinion and order of this date, we DENY the petition for writ of 

mandamus. We VACATE our order of July 22, 2014 staying discovery. We ORDER relator to 

bear the costs of this original proceeding. 

/s/ KERRY P. FITZGERALD 

 JUSTICE
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Thomas F. Prisby, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of CFS Bancorp, Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

         (1)   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
               quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully
               complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m (a) or 78o(d)) and

         (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


Date:  May 14, 2003                           By: /s/    Thomas F. Prisby
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Thomas F. Prisby, Chairman and
                                                 Chief Executive Officer



A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 901 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO CFS BANCORP, INC., WILL BE RETAINED BY CFS BANCORP, INC., AND WILL
BE FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON
REQUEST.
a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b.
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;c.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andd.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: May 11, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Lewis W. Dickey, Jr.Lewis W. Dickey, Jr.Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer 32
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Office of the Secretary

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Department of Labor published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         of December 28, 2015, inviting public comments on the National Guard Youth ChalleNGe Job ChalleNGe Evaluation Information Collection Request (80 FR 80816). The document contained an incorrect date.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Michel Smyth by telephone at 202-693-4129 (this is not a toll-free number) or by email to                         *DOL_PRA_PUBLIC@dol.gov.*

## Correction

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of December 28, 2015, in FR Doc. 2015-32623, on page 80816, (80 FR 80816) in the third column, correct the                         **DATES**                         caption to read:                    

# DATES:

The OMB will consider all written comments that agency receives on or before February 11, 2016.

 Dated: January 22, 2016.

Michel Smyth,

Departmental Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. 2016-01900 Filed 2-2-16; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4510-04-P
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4820-1 Filed: 11/20/19 Entered: 11/20/19 13:18:05 Page 1

of 1
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 15 (Monday, January 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 3901]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-1380]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Availability of Record of Decision for the Naval 
Surface Warfare Center Panama City Division Mission Activities

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy (Navy), after carefully weighing 
the operational and environmental consequences of the proposed action, 
announces its decision to improve the Naval Surface Warfare Center 
Panama City Division's (NSWC PCD's) capabilities to conduct new and 
increased research, development, test, and evaluation (RDT&E) 
operations for the Navy and its Department of Defense customers within 
three military warning areas W-151, W-155, and W-470 and St. Andrew 
Bay, collectively known as the NSWC PCD Study Area. The proposed action 
is required for the Navy to successfully meet current and future 
national and global defense challenges by developing a robust 
capability to research, develop, test, and evaluate systems within the 
NSWC PCD Study Area. In its decision, the Navy considered applicable 
laws, regulations and executive orders, including an analysis of the 
effects of its actions outside the U.S. or its territories under 
Executive Order (EO) 12114, Environmental Effects Abroad of Major 
Federal Actions.
    The proposed action will be accomplished as set out in Alternative 
2, described in the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) as the 
preferred alternative. Implementation of the preferred alternative 
could begin immediately.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Record of Decision (ROD) has been 
distributed to all those individuals who requested a copy of the FEIS 
and agencies and organizations that received a copy of the FEIS. The 
complete text of the Navy's ROD is available for public viewing on the 
project Web site at: http://www.navsea.navy.mil/nswc/panamacity/environment/docs.aspx along with copies of the FEIS and supporting 
documents. Single copies of the ROD will be made available upon request 
by contacting EIS Team Lead, Mrs. Carmen Ferrer, Naval Surface Warfare 
Center Panama City Division, Code CX06, 110 Vernon Avenue, Panama City, 
FL 32407-7001, telephone number 850-234-4146.

    Dated: January 19, 2010.
A.M. Vallandingham,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-1380 Filed 1-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
#### STATE v. SAM JONES.

(Filed 20 September, 1944.)

Criminal Uaw § 80—

A capital case will be docketed and dismissed for failure to perfect , appeal, on motion of Attorney-General, after tbe court bas examined tbe record proper for errors on its face.

HefbndaNt gave notice of appeal from *Bone, J.,*at June Term, 1944, of Halifax.

Motion by State to docket and dismiss defendant’s appeal.

PeR CueiaM.

Tbe defendant was convicted of murder in tbe first degree. Sentence of death by asphyxiation was imposed. Defendant gave notice of appeal to tbe Supreme Court, but no case on appeal was served within tbe time agreed upon in tbe court below, and no steps have been taken to perfect tbe appeal.

Tbe Attorney-General moves to docket and dismiss tbe appeal. This motion must be allowed, but, according to tbe rule of tbe Court in capital cases, we have examined tbe record to see if any error appears. We find no error in tbe record. Appeal dismissed.

Judgment affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 106 (Thursday, June 3, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 31429]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13367]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR10-26-000]


Kinder Morgan Border Pipeline LLC; Notice of Baseline Filing

May 27, 2010.
    Take notice that on May 24, 2010, Kinder Morgan Border Pipeline LLC 
submitted a baseline filing of its Statement of Operating Conditions 
for transportation services provided under section 311 of the Natural 
Gas Policy Act of 1978 (``NGPA'').
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate proceeding must 
file a motion to intervene or to protest this filing must file in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered 
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, 
but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or 
motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests 
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing 
an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on the 
Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before the 
intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or 
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7a3c3f283935141613141f290f0a0a15080e3a1c1f0819541d150c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9adcdfc8d9d5f4f6f3f4ffc9efeaeaf5e8eedafcffe8f9b4fdf5ec">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern time on Monday, June 7, 2010.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-13367 Filed 6-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 237 (Monday, December 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 63539]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30060]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[AK-962-1410-00-P; F-14954-A2, F-19148-37]


Alaska Native Claims Selection

    In accordance with Departmental regulation 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice 
is hereby given that a decision to issue conveyance under the 
provisions of Sec. 14(a) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act of 
December 18, 1971, 43 U.S.C. 1601, 1613(a), will be issued to Olgoonik 
Corporation for 13,497 acres. The lands involved are in the vicinity of 
Wainwright, Alaska, within Tps. 14 and 16 N., Rs. 30 W., Umiat 
Meridian, Alaska.
    A notice of the decision will be published once a week, for four 
(4) consecutive weeks, in The Arctic Sounder. Copies of the decision 
may be obtained by contacting the Alaska State Office of the Bureau of 
Land Management, 222 West Seventh Avenue, #13, Anchorage, Alaska 99513-
7599 ((907) 271-5960).
    Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely affected 
by the decision, an agency of the Federal government or regional 
corporation, shall have until January 10, 1996 to file an appeal. 
However, parties receiving service by certified mail shall have 30 days 
from the date of receipt to file an appeal. Appeals must be filed in 
the Bureau of Land Management at the address identified above, where 
the requirements for filing an appeal may be obtained. Parties who do 
not file an appeal in accordance with the requirements of 43 CFR Part 
4, Subpart E, shall be deemed to have waived their rights.
Carolyn A. Bailey,
Land Law Examiner, Branch of Gulf Rim Adjudication.
[FR Doc. 95-30060 Filed 12-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P
#### STATE v. MRS. T. E. McAFEE.

(Filed 19 March, 1930.)

See same case next preceding.

Appeal by.defendant from *Lyon, Emergency Judge,*at December Term, 1929, of LeNoie.

Affirmed.

*510
      *Attorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.*

*0.*N. *Allen for defendant.*

Adams, J.

Tbe disposition of the defendant’s appeal is controlled by the opinion in the preceding *case*—S. *v. Mrs. T. E. McAfee, ante,*507.

Judgment affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 31**

I, Andrew Wallace certify that: 

1.     I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB (“Report”) of Solar Energy Limited; 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report; 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the period presented in this Report; 

4.     I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: 

a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared; 

b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and 

c)     Disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.     I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

Date: May 17, 2007 

/s/ Andrew Wallace 

Andrew Wallace 

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer 

**33**

----
4819-1483-6649.1

EXHIBIT C

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4528-3 Filed: 10/31/19 Entered: 10/31/19 08:50:51 Page 1

of 2
4819-1483-6649.1 Exhibit C

EXPENSE SUMMARY (COBLENTZ PATCH DUFFY & BASS LLP) FOR THE PERIOD 

SEPTEMBER 1, 2019 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2019

EXPENSES AMOUNTS

Computerized Research N/A

Meals N/A

Travel N/A

Transportation N/A

Duplicating N/A

Transcription (Deposition) Services $5,266.00

Third Party Consulting Fees N/A

Telephone Conferencing N/A

Messenger N/A

Filing Fees N/A

Court Website Subscription Fee for Case No. JCCP4974 N/A

Total Expenses Requested: $5,266.00

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4528-3 Filed: 10/31/19 Entered: 10/31/19 08:50:51 Page 2

of 2
#### TOWN OF CARY v. J. M. TEMPLETON, Jr.

(Filed 16 April, 1930.)

Judgments C c — Consent judgment is solemn contract of parties and may not be set aside in absence of fraud or mutual mistake.

A consent judgment is the solemn contract of the parties entered of record with the consent of the court, and in the absence of fraud or mutual mistake cannot be set aside without the consent of all, and applies to the authorization of a judicial sale under such judgment.

Civil aotioN, before *Lyon, J.,*at January Special Term, 1930, of Wake.

*605
      *Clyde A. Douglass for plaintiff.*

*W. Brantley Wornble for defendant.*

Pee Curiam:.

Tbis proceeding involves the confirmation of a judicial sale. A consent judgment was entered authorizing the sale of property. There is no contention that the sale was not properly conducted in full accordance with said judgment. A consent judgment is the solemn contract of the parties entered upon the records of the court with the sanction and approval thereof. *Ellis v. Ellis,*193 N. C., 216, 136 S. E., 350; hence, in the absence of fraud or mutual mistake, such a judgment cannot be altered or set aside without the consent of all parties thereto. *Bank v. Mitchell,*191 N. C., 190, 131 S. E., 656.

The record discloses no error of law warranting a reversal of the judgment, and the same is

Affirmed.