alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5699 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 12, 2014 

Received 

AN ACT 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire approximately 44 acres of land in Martinez, California, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5699 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘John Muir National 

3 Historic Site Expansion Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. JOHN MUIR NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE LAND ACQUI5 SITION. 

6 (a) ACQUISITION.—The Secretary of the Interior may 

7 acquire by donation the approximately 44 acres of land, 

8 and interests in such land, that are identified on the map 

9 entitled ‘‘John Muir National Historic Site Proposed 

10 Boundary Expansion’’, numbered 426/127150, and dated 

11 November, 2014. 

12 (b) BOUNDARY.—Upon the acquisition of the land 

13 authorized by subsection (a), the Secretary of the Interior 

14 shall adjust the boundaries of the John Muir Historic Site 

15 in Martinez, California, to include the land identified on 

16 the map referred to in subsection (a). 

17 (c) ADMINISTRATION.—The land and interests in 

18 land acquired under subsection (a) shall be administered 

19 as part of the John Muir National Historic Site estab20 lished by the Act of August 31, 1964 (Public Law 88– 

21 547; 78 Stat. 753; 16 U.S.C. 461 note). 

22 (d) DATE CERTAIN.—The authority provided in sub23 sections (a), (b), and (c) shall apply only if the lands iden24 tified on the map entitled ‘‘John Muir National Historic 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 5699 RDS 

1 Site Proposed Boundary Expansion’’ are held in title by 

2 the Muir Heritage Land Trust by May 31, 2015. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 11, 

2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit
      23.1**





Kenne
      Ruan, CPA, P.C.Phone:
      (203) 824-0441 Fax: (203) 413-6486


40
      Hemlock Hollow Road, Woodbridge, CT 06525


kruancpa@yahoo.com





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the filing documentation on Form
      10-KSB of Firstway Enterprises Inc of our report dated March 28, 2008, relating
      to the financial statements of the period from January 9, 2007 (inception)
      to
      December 31, 2007.




/s/
                Kenne Ruan, CPA, P.C.




Woodbridge,
      Connecticut


March
      28,
      2008
Skip to main content

# Social Security

Search
Menu
Español
Sign in

## Single-Year Tables Consistent With 2016 OASDI Trustees Report

2016 OASDI Trustees Report

      The tables listed below provide estimates by      alternative economic and/or demographic assumptions.      For some of the tables, we also provide historical data.      The tables carry the same designation as in the published report.      Reference should be made to the report      to understand the context in which the estimates are presented.      

 

Questions?   Address Questions about these tables to     actuary@ssa.gov

Footer menu
#### PEOPLES BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, Administrator of HUGH R. MAY, Deceased, v. JOHNNIE ORR and JAMES HINTON.

(Filed 20 March, 1957.)

Appeal by defendants from *Moore (Clifton L.), J.,*September Term 1956 of Nash.

This action was instituted 14 April 1954 by Hugh R. May to recover for personal injuries and property damage sustained in a collision on 7 October 1953 between his Buick automobile, driven by his son, Hugh R. May, Jr., on State Highway No. 95, near Rocky Mount, and a jeep, owned by the defendant Johnnie Orr and operated by his co-defendant James 'Hinton. On 20 March. 1956, the court was informed of the death of Hugh R. May, and the Peoples Bank and Trust Company, administrator of the estate of Hugh R. May, was duly substituted as party-plaintiff.

The case was submitted to the jury on appropriate issues which were answered in favor of plaintiff.

Judgment was entered on the verdict, and the defendants appeal, assigning error.

*668
      *Thorp & Thorp for plaintiff appellee.*

*O. B. Moss for defendant appellants.*

Per Cueiam.

The only exceptions entered by the appellants in the trial below were to the failure of the court to sustain their motion for judgment as of nonsuit at the close of plaintiff’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence. A careful review of the evidence leads us to the conclusion that it was sufficient to justify its submission to the jury.

The ruling of the court below will be upheld.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5759 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5759

   To establish a rule of construction clarifying the limitations on 
  executive authority to provide certain forms of immigration relief.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 20, 2014

Mr. Yoho (for himself, Mr. Brooks of Alabama, Mr. LaMalfa, Mr. Gohmert, 
  Mr. Long, and Mr. Palazzo) introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To establish a rule of construction clarifying the limitations on 
  executive authority to provide certain forms of immigration relief.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Executive Amnesty Prevention Act of 
2014''.

SEC. 2. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

    (a) In General.--No provision of the United States Constitution, 
the Immigration and Nationality Act, or other Federal law shall be 
interpreted or applied to authorize the executive branch of the 
Government to exempt, by Executive order, regulation, or any other 
means, categories of persons unlawfully present in the United States 
from removal under the immigration laws (as such term is defined in 
section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act). Any action by the 
executive branch with the purpose of circumventing the objectives of 
this statute shall be null and void and without legal effect.
    (b) Effective Date.--This Act shall have effect retroactively, and 
shall apply to any such exemption made at any time.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of the Settlement of Valentine Snedeker, Executor.

Decree of surrogaté modified by striking out the part which directs payment in part out of general estate, affirmed m other respects, without costs to either party on this appeal.

Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Florida Banks, Inc.
(the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Charles E. Hughes, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. Date: May 14, 2004 By:
    /s/ Charles E. Hughes, Jr.Charles E. Hughes, Jr.Chief Executive Officer
#### James E. Cooper, Respondent, v. Mary T. Young, Appellant.

Judgment reversed and new Trial granted, costs to abide event.

Opinion by

Dykman, J.;

Barnard, P. J.. not sitting.
#### John Spickerman, Respondent, v. Adam McChesney, Appellant.

Orders affirmed on opinion below, with ten dollars costs, without prejudice to renewal of application for stay on report of referee in plaintiff’s favor, and before decision in Court of Appeals in former action.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Rory J. Cowan, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Lionbridge Technologies, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained in SEC Release No. 34-47986]; 

 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 5, 2004
EXHIBIT 31.2  I, Jim Akrivos, in my capacity indicated below, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Grand Motion, Inc. (the Registrant); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and   procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; 5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  Date: April 10, 2008 /s/ Jim Akrivos Jim Akrivos, President (as Principal Financial Officer)
Skip to main content

# Social Security

Search
Menu
Español
Sign in

## Social Security Administrative Expenses

Trust fund data

The table below shows Social Security administrative        expenses, by trust fund.  Since 1989, such expenses have totaled one     percent or less of combined cost from the trust funds.

**Administrative expenses as a percentage of total cost, 1957-2023**CalendaryearPercentage of total cost**Administrative expenses** (in millions)TotalOASIDITotalOASIDI19572.2%2.2%5.1%$164$162$319582.3%2.2%4.6%2071941219592.2%1.8%10.3%2341845019602.0%1.8%6.0%2402033619612.3%1.9%6.7%3032396419622.1%1.8%5.6%3222566619632.1%1.9%5.2%3482816819642.2%1.9%5.6%3752967919652.2%1.9%5.3%4183289019661.9%1.3%7.0%39325613719672.3%2.0%5.2%51540610919682.3%2.0%5.2%60347612719692.2%1.9%5.1%61247413819701.9%1.6%5.0%63547116419711.9%1.5%5.1%71951420519722.1%1.7%4.9%90767423319731.6%1.4%3.2%83764719019741.8%1.6%3.0%1,08286521719751.7%1.5%2.9%1,15289625619761.6%1.4%2.7%1,24495928519771.6%1.3%3.3%1,37998139919781.5%1.3%2.5%1,4401,11532519791.4%1.2%2.6%1,4831,11337119801.2%1.1%2.3%1,5221,15436819811.2%1.0%2.5%1,7431,30743619821.3%1.1%3.3%2,1091,51959019831.3%1.0%3.4%2,1531,52862519841.3%1.0%3.4%2,2641,63862619851.2%0.9%3.1%2,2001,59260819861.1%0.9%2.9%2,2021,60160019871.1%0.8%4.0%2,3731,52484919881.1%0.9%3.3%2,5131,77673719891.0%0.8%3.2%2,4271,67375419900.9%0.7%2.8%2,2701,56370719910.9%0.7%2.8%2,5871,79279419920.9%0.7%2.6%2,6641,83083419931.0%0.7%2.7%2,9631,99696619940.8%0.6%2.6%2,6741,6451,02919950.9%0.7%2.5%3,1412,0771,06419960.8%0.6%2.6%2,9621,8021,16019970.9%0.7%2.7%3,4092,1281,28019980.9%0.6%3.1%3,4671,8991,56719990.8%0.5%2.9%3,3281,8091,51920000.9%0.6%2.9%3,7882,1491,63920010.8%0.5%2.8%3,7021,9611,74120020.9%0.5%3.0%4,1852,1372,04920031.0%0.6%2.7%4,5622,5532,00820040.9%0.6%2.7%4,5362,3842,15220051.0%0.7%2.6%5,2722,9572,31520061.0%0.7%2.5%5,3373,0102,32620070.9%0.6%2.5%5,5423,0752,46820080.9%0.6%2.3%5,7493,2232,52620090.9%0.6%2.3%6,1823,4392,74320100.9%0.6%2.3%6,5253,5432,98220110.9%0.6%2.2%6,4053,4862,92020120.8%0.5%2.1%6,3383,4482,89020130.7%0.5%1.9%6,1663,3972,76920140.7%0.4%2.0%6,0663,1332,93320150.7%0.4%1.9%6,1693,3762,79220160.7%0.4%1.9%6,2293,4692,76020170.7%0.5%1.9%6,4573,6612,79620180.7%0.4%1.9%6,6563,8002,85620190.6%0.4%1.8%6,4223,7332,68920200.6%0.4%1.7%6,3033,7482,55520210.6%0.4%1.7%6,4924,0112,48120220.5%0.4%1.9%6,7463,9992,74720230.5%0.4%1.8%7,2064,3672,839

Footer menu
Order entered July 31 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 15 - 00102 - CV ESTATE OF FREDERIC B . ASCHE, JR., DECEAS ED On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. PR - 11 - 3533 - 2 

### O RDER The Court GRANTS cross - appellants’ July 30, 2015 motion to extend time to file their
cross - appellants’ brief. We ORDER the cross

- appellants’ brief filed by AUGUST 31, 2015
. /s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 20 (Monday, February 1, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 5139]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-01765]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION


Request for Letters of Intent To Apply for 2016 Technology 
Initiative Grant Funding; Correction

AGENCY: Legal Services Corporation.

ACTION: Correction Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On January 20, 2016, the Legal Services Corporation (LSC) 
published a notice in the Federal Register (81 FR 3162) titled 
``Request for Letters of Intent To Apply for 2015 Technology Initiative 
Grant Funding.'' The title to this notice contained a typographical 
error. This document corrects the notice by revising the title.

DATES: This correction is effective January 20, 2016

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Freedman, Senior Associate 
General Counsel, Legal Services Corporation, 3333 K Street NW., 
Washington, DC 20007; (202) 295-1500; <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bbd6ddc9dededfd6dad5fbd7c8d895dcd4cd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b4d9d2c6d1d1d0d9d5daf4d8c7d79ad3dbc2">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The title should read ``Request for Letters 
of Intent to Apply for 2016 Technology Initiative Grant Funding.''

    Dated: January 27, 2016.
Katherine Ward,
Executive Assistant to the Vice President for Legal Affairs and General 
Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2016-01765 Filed 1-29-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7050-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
O General de Divisão Javier A. Reina é o Comandante-Adjunto de 

Mobilização e Assuntos de Reserva no Comando Sul dos EUA em Doral, 

Florida. Ele é o principal consultor da comandante para assuntos de 

reserva, supervisionando a mão de obra, o pessoal e as funções 

administrativas para maximizar a integração efetiva do Componente de 

Reserva em apoio ao plano de campanha do teatro de operações da 

Comandante Combatente.

 O General de Divisão Reina ingressou no exército em 1982. Depois de 

servir como soldado na 82a Divisão Aerotransportada e no 1/11o Grupo 

de Forças Especiais (Aerotransportado), ele foi comissionado pelo 

programa do Corpo de Treinamento de Oficiais da Reserva do Exército 

da Universidade Rutgers em 1989.

Javier Alexander Reina

General de Divisão, Guarda Nacional do Exército dos EUA

Comandante-Adjunto de Mobilização e Assuntos de Reserva

Comando Sul dos EUA

 A sua formação inclui um bacharelado em engenharia eléctrica da Universidade Rutgers, mestrado em 

administração de empresas pela Universidade Bryant e mestrado em estudos estratégicos pela Escola 

Colégio de Guerra do Exército dos EUA.

 O General de Divisão Reina desempenhou várias funções importantes de liderança, comando e 

operacionais. Ao entrar para a Guarda Nacional de Rhode Island em 1993, foi destacado como Chefe de 

Pelotão da 115a Companhia de Polícia Militar mais tarde, serviu como Oficial de Operações de Lei e Ordem 

do 118o Batalhão de Polícia Militar. Também serviu brevemente na Guarda Nacional do Havaí como Oficial 

de Logística da 29a Brigada de Infantaria e depois regressou à Guarda Nacional de Rhode Island como 

Comandante da 115a Companhia da Polícia Militar. Ele também ocupou outros cargos importantes, 

como o de Oficial de Logística S4 e Oficial de Operações da 43a Brigada de Polícia Militar, Comandante 

do 118o Batalhão de Polícia Militar, Comandante da 43a Brigada de Polícia Militar, e Comandante do 

Componente Terrestre.

O General de Divisão Reina é veterano de dois destacamentos: em 2002, como Oficial de 

Planejamento da Força de Intervenção Conjunta 160 (na Baía de Guantánamo, Cuba) e em 2005, como 

Oficial de Logística S4 na 43a Brigada da Polícia Militar (em Bagdá, Iraque). Ao longo da sua 

carreira, ele recebeu várias condecorações pessoais, conjuntas, de unidade, de serviço e de campanha. 

 As suas condecorações pessoais incluem a Legião de Mérito (concedida duas vezes), a Estrela de Bronze, a 

Medalha de Serviço Meritório (concedida quatro vezes), a Medalha de Comenda de Serviço Conjunto, a 

Medalha de Comenda do Exército e a Medalha de Desempenho do Exército (concedida duas vezes).

 Na sua capacidade civil, ele trabalha para o Departamento da Marinha dos EUA como profissional de 

Gestão de Cooperação e Segurança da Defesa, apoiando o planejamento, a gestão e a execução de 

casos de vendas militares ao estrangeiro (FMS) com países parceiros estratégicos para a 

aquisição e implementação de sistemas defensivos submarinos. O General de Divisão Reina e sua esposa 

Maria são os orgulhosos pais de Ryan e Allie.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5687 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

101 East Market Street in Long Beach, California, as the ‘‘Juanita 

Millender-McDonald Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 12, 2014 

Ms. HAHN (for herself, Ms. BASS, Mr. BECERRA, Mr. BERA of California, Ms. 

BROWNLEY of California, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. CAMPBELL, Mrs. CAPPS, 

Mr. CA ́RDENAS, Ms. CHU, Mr. COOK, Mr. COSTA, Mrs. DAVIS of California, Mr. DENHAM, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. FARR, Mr. GARAMENDI, Mr. 

HONDA, Mr. HUFFMAN, Mr. HUNTER, Mr. ISSA, Mr. LAMALFA, Ms. LEE

of California, Ms. LOFGREN, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Ms. MATSUI, Mr. MCCARTHY of California, Mr. MCCLINTOCK, Mr. MCKEON, Mr. MCNERNEY, Mr. 

GEORGE MILLER of California, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mrs. NEGRETE

MCLEOD, Ms. PELOSI, Mr. PETERS of California, Mr. ROHRABACHER, 

Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mr. ROYCE, Mr. RUIZ, Ms. LINDA T. SA ́NCHEZ of 

California, Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. SHERMAN, Ms. SPEIER, Mr. SWALWELL of California, Mr. TAKANO, Mr. 

THOMPSON of California, Mr. VALADAO, Mr. VARGAS, Ms. WATERS, and 

Mr. WAXMAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 101 East Market Street in Long Beach, California, as the ‘‘Juanita Millender-McDonald Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5687 IH

1 SECTION 1. JUANITA MILLENDER-MCDONALD POST OF2 FICE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 101 East Market Street in Long 

5 Beach, California, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Juanita Millender-McDonald Post Office’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in section 1 shall be 

10 deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Juanita Millender11 McDonald Post Office’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS