alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 239 (Wednesday, December 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 64030]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30291]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Corps of Engineers


Intent To Prepare a Draft Supplement to a Final Environmental 
Impact Statement (EIS) for Proposed Construction of a Water Supply 
Reservoir on Sugar Creek in Williamson and Johnson Counties, IL

AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Engineer District, 
Louisville, Corps of Engineers, CEORL-PD-R, P.O. Box 59, Louisville, 
Kentucky 40201-0059.

ACTION: Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft SEIS.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Engineer District, Louisville Corps of Engineers 
is initiating the preparation of a Draft Supplement to a Final EIS for 
a regulatory permit application from the City of Marion, Illinois. The 
proposed action by the City of Marion is the construction of a water 
supply reservoir on Sugar Creek in Williamson and Johnson Counties, 
Illinois by the City of Marion, Illinois. The Draft supplement will 
address only the alternative action of purchase of water from Rend 
Lake, an existing reservoir in southern Illinois.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions or comments concerning the preparation of this Draft 
Supplement to the Final EIS should be addressed to Mr. Terry Siemsen at 
the above address or by telephone (502) 582-5550.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Louisville District prepared a Draft and 
Final EIS (Final EIS completed July 1995) for this permit application. 
The Final EIS concluded that purchase of water from Rend Lake by the 
City of Marion was not a viable alternative since the information 
available at that time indicated that the available water supply of 
that reservoir was fully committed. Since that document was completed 
and circulated for public opinion, additional information has been 
provided to the Louisville District that indicates that the public 
water supply capability of Rend Lake has not been fully committed.

    Dated: December 1, 1995.
Michael F. Hullihan,
Lieutenant Colonel, Deputy Commander.
[FR Doc. 95-30291 Filed 12-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-JB-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6828

ANNE CATHERINE AKERS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN,

Respondent - Appellee.

No. 23-7141

ANNE CATHERINE AKERS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

Paula Xinis, District Judge. (1:23-cv-00502-PX)

Submitted: June 3, 2024 Decided: June 21, 2024

Before WYNN and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6828 Doc: 12 Filed: 06/21/2024 Pg: 1 of 4
2

No. 23-6828, dismissed; No. 23-7141, affirmed, by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anne Catherine Akers, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6828 Doc: 12 Filed: 06/21/2024 Pg: 2 of 4
3

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Anne Catherine Akers, a former state pretrial 

detainee, appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice her 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2241 petition (No. 23-6828) and a subsequent order denying her motion to copy work

(No. 23-7141). We dismiss as moot the appeal in No. 23-6828 and affirm in No. 23-7141. 

In Appeal No. 23-6828, Akers appeals the district court’s order dismissing without 

prejudice her § 2241 petition, in which she challenged her pretrial detention. Akers was 

convicted in Maryland state court during the pendency of this appeal. Because Akers is no 

longer a pretrial detainee, her appeal is moot. See, e.g., Jackson v. Clements, 796 F.3d 841, 

843 (7th Cir. 2015) (per curiam). We therefore dismiss the appeal in No. 23-6828 for lack 

of jurisdiction.1

In Appeal No. 23-7141, Akers appeals the district court’s order denying her motion 

to copy work. We confine our review to the issues raised in Akers’ informal brief. See 4th 

Cir. R. 34(b). Because Akers’ informal brief does not challenge the district court’s finding 

that Akers failed to show a particularized need for the copy work, she has forfeited 

appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 

2014) (noting court’s review is limited to issues preserved in informal brief); Williams v. 

Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004) (issues not raised in brief are 

1 We note, however, that Akers may challenge her detention under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 

now that she has been convicted in state court. But any such challenge would be subject 

to § 2254’s exhaustion requirements.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6828 Doc: 12 Filed: 06/21/2024 Pg: 3 of 4
4

abandoned). Accordingly, we affirm the appeal in No. 23-7141. We further deny Akers’ 

motion to seal2 and motion to appoint counsel. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

No. 23-6828, DISMISSED

No. 23-7141, AFFIRMED

2 To the extent that Akers seeks to seal all or any part of the record in the district 

court, Akers’ motion should be filed in the district court. See 4th Cir. R. 25(c)(2).

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6828 Doc: 12 Filed: 06/21/2024 Pg: 4 of 4
#### GRACE W. LERTZ v. HUGHES BROTHERS, INCORPORATED, JAMES B. HUGHES, J. W. HUGHES, MRS. NELSON HUGHES, MRS. ANNIE T. HUGHES, and MISS JULIA McLAURIN.

(Filed 18 September, 1935.)

Appeal by plaintiff from judgment of nonsuit as to tbe defendant Julia McLaurin, entered by *Prizzelle, J.,*at February Term, 1935, of New Hanovee.

Affirmed.

*Kellum & Humphrey and B. M. Kermon for plaintiff, appellant.*

*Carr, Poisson & James, and Robert D. Qronly, Jr., for defendant, appellee.*

ScheNgk, J.

Tbis was a civil action instituted to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to bave been caused by tbe negligent operation by tbe defendant, Julia McLaurin, of an automobile in wbicb tbe plaintiff was a guest passenger.

Julia McLaurin, tbe appellee, was a codefendant witb Hughes Brothers, Incorporated, appellants in *Lertz v. Hughes Brothers, Inc., et al.,*argued jointly witb tbis appeal in tbis Court. On tbe argument it was stated by counsel for tbe plaintiff, appellant herein, that if tbe plaintiff's judgment against Hughes Brothers, appellant in tbe other appeal, was upheld, she would be no longer interested in tbis appeal. Said judgment has been affirmed, *ante,*490. ¥e bave, nevertheless, examined tbe record and think that bis Honor ruled correctly in allowing Miss Mc-Laurin’s motion for judgment as of nonsuit.

Affirmed.
#### STATE v. WALTER MOUNCE.

(Filed 27 February, 1946.)

Criminal Law § 62a—

Upon a plea of *nolo contendere*to a charge of receiving cigarettes of the value of $75.00 knowing them' to have been stolen, a sentence of imprison- - ment at hard labor for not less than three years, nor more than five years is within the limits prescribed by statute, G. S., 14-1, G. S., 14-2, G. S., 14-3, G. S., 14-71, and therefore defendant’s contention that the punishment imposed is excessive for the offense charged is not meritorious.

Appeal by defendant from *Pless, J.,*at August Term, 1945, of ROCKINGHAM.

*Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorneys-General Rhodes, Moody, and Tucker for the State.*

*Glidewell •& Glidewell for defendant, appellant.*

Sea well, J.

Tbe defendant was brought before the court on a bill of indictment charging him with receiving sixty cartons of Chesterfield cigarettes of the value of seventy-five dollars, knowing them to have been stolen. When the case came on for trial, he entered a plea of *nolo contendere.*Thereupon, the court entered judgment that he be imprisoned in the State’s Prison at hard labor for not less than three years nor more than five years. Prom this judgment the defendant appealed.

The appellant contends that the term of imprisonment imposed upon him is excessive punishment for the offense charged, and constitutes reversible error. At the same time the brief concedes, and correctly so, that the sentence is within the stated limits of the law. G. S., 14-1, G. S., 14-2, G. S., 14-3, G. S., 14-71; *S. v. Reddick,*222 N. C., 520, 23 S. E. (2d), 909; *S. v. Harwood,*206 N. C., 87, 173 S. E., 24; *S. v. Ritter,*199 N. C., 116, 120, 164 S. E., 62; *S. v. Brite,*73 N. C., 26. The exercise of the court’s discretion, within the limitations of applicable statutes respecting punishment, will not be disturbed when objection is predicated solely on the ground of excessive punishment. *S. v. Levy,*220 N. C., 812, 18 S. E. (2d), 355; *S. v. Calcutt,*219 N. C., 545, 569, 15 S. E. (2d), 9; *S. v. Brackett,*218 N. C., 369, 11 S. E. (2d), 146; *S. v. Harris,*204 N. C., 422, 423, 424, 168 S. E., 498; *S. v. Rippy,*127 N. C., 516, 517, 37 S. E., 148; *S. v. Brite, supra.*

The exception is not meritorious, and the judgment of the trial court is

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Pacific Copper Corp. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





The annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2011 (the “Form 10-K”) of the Company fully complies with the requirement of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:   February 13, 2012





/s/ David HackmanDavid Hackman, CEO(Chief Executive Officer of Pacific Copper Corp.)





Dated:  February 13, 2012





/s/ Rakesh MalhotraRakesh Malhotra, Chief Financial Officer(Chief Financial Officer of Pacific Copper Corp.)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Pacific Copper Corp. and will be retained by Pacific Copper Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

# DATES:

Comments should be received on or before February 29, 2016 to be assured of consideration.

# ADDRESSES:

                        Send comments regarding the burden estimate, or any other aspect of the information collection, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to (1) Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Attention: Desk Officer for Treasury, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503, or email at                         *OIRA_Submission@OMB.EOP.gov*                         and (2) Treasury PRA Clearance Officer, 1750 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Suite 8117, Washington, DC 20220, or email at                         *PRA@treasury.gov.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Copies of the submission may be obtained by emailing                         *PRA@treasury.gov,*                         calling (202) 622-1295, or viewing the entire information collection request at                         *www.reginfo.gov.*

## Bureau of the Fiscal Service

*OMB Control Number:*                         1510-0056.                    

*Type of Review:*                         Extension of a currently approved collection.                    

*Title:*                         ACH Vendor/Miscellaneous Payment Enrollment Form.                    

*Form:*                         SF 3881.                    

*Abstract:*                         Form SF 3881 is used by federal agencies to gather essential payment data from vendors for processing payments through the Automated Clearinghouse (ACH) network to the vendor's financial institution.                    

*Affected Public:*                         Businesses or other for-profits; not-for-profit institutions.                    

*Estimated Average Annual Burden per Response:*                         15 minutes.                    

*Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours:*                         17,500.                    

Brenda Simms,

Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. 2016-01709 Filed 1-28-16; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4810-AS-P
EXHIBIT C 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5273-3 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 13:41:19 Page 1

of 4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5273-3 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 13:41:19 Page 2

of 4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5273-3 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 13:41:19 Page 3

of 4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5273-3 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 13:41:19 Page 4

of 4
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 238 (Tuesday, December 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 63713]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30126]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Freight Forwarder License Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission applications for licenses as ocean 
freight forwarders pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 
(46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR 510).
    Persons knowing of any reason why any of the following applicants 
should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Freight Forwarders, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573.

Seiwa America, Inc., 5500 Frantz Road, Suite 117, Dublin OH 43017, 
Officers: Kazunari Tada, President, Seigo Iwafune, Executive Vice 
President
Honesty Trade and Business Around The World, 7400 Harwin Drive, Suite 
112, Houston, TX 77036, Tarek A. Morsi, Sole Proprietor
Overseas Trading & Shipping Co., Inc., 2719 Pittman Drive, Silver 
Spring, MD 20910, Officers: Mohamed Ali Taha, President, Richard Paul 
Stevens, Treasurer/Secretary
Independent Brokerage, L.L.C., 510 Plaza Drive #2755, Atlanta, GA 
30349, Officers: Leslie M. Dodgen, President, Robin T. Craig, Vice 
President
King Senderax, Incorporated dba, King Senderax Cargo, 1520 North Gower 
Street, #100, Los Angeles, CA 90028, Officers: Anupam Biswas, C.E.O., 
Norbert Giessmann, Vice President
Robinson Expediters, Inc., 9675 NW 13th Street, Miami, FL 33172, 
Officers: Jorge Robinson, President, Ebba Robinson, Vice President
Cibao Cargo/Cibao Furniture, Inc., 14 East 167 Street, Bronx, NY 10452, 
Officer: Jose Perdomo, President
Marimar Forwarding, Inc., 9604 N.W. 13th Street, Miami, FL 33172, 
Officer: Maria A. Morales, President
Lynx International, Inc., 1942 Shawnee Road, Eagan, MN 55122, Officers: 
Joel N. Meyer, President, Mark D. Spurbeck, Vice President
Wesley S. Koerber, 4242 Harford Creamery Road, White Hall, MD 21161, 
Sole Proprietor
Glory Express, Inc., 460 Carson Plaza Drive, #119, Carson, CA 90746, 
Officers: Kuk Yul Cho, President
VIP Transport, Inc., 2703 Wardlow Road, Corona, CA 91720, Officers: 
Danny C. Griffins, President

    Dated: December 6, 1995.

    By the Federal Maritime Commission.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-30126 Filed 12-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

August 25, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh 128283 & (61)(62) Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, MARCIA VAN TIL, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 128283 COA: 250539 Ottawa CC: 02-042717-NO ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e Clerk of the Court having received a Notice of Death of the plaintiff, and no motion fo r substitution having been recei ved within 91 days after filing and service of the no tice, defendant’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED. MCR 2.202(A)(1)(b).

d0821 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 25, 2006

Clerk
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

March 24, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
135339 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan SHANNON NEAL BRINKLEY, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 135339 COA: 269725 Wayne CC: 98-840467-DM LENA MARIE BRINKLEY, Defendant-Appellee,

and

KENNETH BACA and PATRICIA BACA, Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e October 16, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0317 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 24, 2008

Clerk
----

|   | Exhibit      21                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|   | SUBSIDIARIES      OF THE REGISTRANT                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|   | ·   Warrior Gas      Co., a Texas corporation, which has a wholly owned subsidiary, Clajon      Industrial Gas, Inc., a Texas corporation                                                                   |
|   | ·   Clayton      Williams Trading Company, a Texas corporation                                                                                                                                              |
|   | ·   Clayton      Williams Venezuela, Inc., a Delaware corporation                                                                                                                                           |
|   | ·   CWEI      Acquisitions, Inc., a Delaware corporation                                                                                                                                                    |
|   | ·   Clayton      Williams Pipeline Corporation (formerly Clayton Williams Midland, Inc.), a      Delaware corporation                                                                                       |
|   | ·   CWEI Romere      Pass Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation, which is the sole member      of Romere Pass Acquisition, L.L.C. (formerly Romere Pass Acquisition      Corp.)                         |
|   | ·   Warrior      Mississippi Corporation, a Delaware corporation                                                                                                                                            |
|   | ·        Southwest Royalties, Inc., a Delaware corporation, which has two wholly      owned subsidiaries, Blue Heel Company, a Delaware corporation and Tex-Hal      Partners, Inc., a Delaware corporation |
|   | ·   West Coast      Energy Properties GP, LLC, a Texas limited liability    company                                                                                                                         |
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1
 BELDEN AND BLAKE CORPORATION  AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER
 AS AMENDED AND APPROVED BY THE AUDIT COMMITTEE AND BOARD OF
DIRECTORS ON MARCH 27, 2006
  Organization
   Purposes
  
    
    the integrity of the Companys financial statements;
    
    the Companys financial reporting process;
    
    the Companys systems of internal accounting and financial controls;
    
    the performance of the independent auditors;
    
    the independent auditors qualifications and independence;
    
    the Companys compliance with ethics policies and legal and regulatory requirements.
   Duties and Responsibilities
 1
        
    
    The independent auditors internal quality control procedures.
    
    Any material issues raised by the most recent internal quality control review, or
peer review, of the independent auditor, or by any inquiry or investigation by
governmental or professional authorities, within the preceding five years, respecting
one or more independent audits carried out by the independent auditor, and any steps
taken to deal with any such issues.
    
    All relationships between the independent auditor and the Company.
  2
        3
        Procedures
       4