alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 14383-002]

*Project Name and Number:*                     Whitewater Creek Hydroelectric Project No. 14383-002.                

*Date and Time of Meeting:*                     February 11, 2016; 1:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.                

*Place:*                     Telephone conference with Terracon and the Oregon State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO).                

*FERC Contact:*                     Laura Washington,                     *Laura.Washington@ferc.gov*                     or (202) 502-6072.                

*Purpose of Meeting:*                     Cultural resources consultation to discuss Oregon SHPO comments concerning the cultural resources study report with Whitewater Creek and FERC.                

A summary of the meeting will be prepared and filed in the Commission's public file for the project.

                    All local, state, and federal agencies, Indian tribes, and other interested parties are invited to participate by phone. Please contact Laura Washington at                     *Laura.Washington@ferc.gov*                     or (202) 502-6072 by close of business February 9, 2016, to R.S.V.P. and to receive specific instructions on how to participate.                

      ( print page 5739)    
Dated: January 28, 2016.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2016-01959 Filed 2-2-16; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### O. D. HINNANT v. AMERICAN FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

(Filed 8 March, 1933.)

New Trial C c—

The trial court is without authority to vacate a judgment of nonsuit and grant a new trial after adjournment of the term at which the case was tried except by consent. In this case such order was entered by the trial court when called upon to settle the case on appeal.

Appeal by defendant, American Fire and Marine Insurance Company, from *Grady, J.,*at Chambers in Smithfield, 10 December, 1932. From JohNstoN.

Civil action to recover on insurance policy, tried at tbe September-October Term, 1932, Johnston Superior Court, which resulted in judgment of nonsuit, and from which plaintiff gave notice of appeal. Plaintiff’s statement of case on appeal and defendant’s counter-case were both filed in apt time, and duly sent to tbe judge for settlement. Tbe following order was entered 10 December, 1932:

“This cause coming on to be beard at Smithfield, N. 0., for tbe purpose of settling tbe case on appeal, and this court having carefully considered tbe counter-ease as made out by tbe defendants, and tbe court being of tbe opinion, upon said counter-case, and the case as made up and served by tbe plaintiff, that a new trial should be ordered, and that it is useless to put tbe parties to tbe expense of an appeal; now, upon tbe facts admitted in tbe two ‘cases’ as made up by tbe parties, and also in tbe discretion of tbe court, it is ordered that tbe verdict and judgment entered in this cause at tbe September-October Term, 1932, be and tbe same is set aside, and a new trial ordered upon tbe same or some other proper issues.

This 10 December, 1932. Heney A. Geady, *Judge Presiding.”*

From this order tbe defendant, American Fire and Marine Insurance Company, appeals, assigning error.

*308
      *A. J. Fletcher for defendant, American Fire and Marine Insurance Company.*

Stacy, C. J.

Laudable as bis purpose may have been, tlie learned judge was without authority to vacate the judgment of nonsuit and grant a new trial after adjournment of the term at which the case was tried, except by consent. *Acceptance Corp. v. Jones,*203 N. C., 523; *Bisanar v. Suttlemyre,*193 N. C., 711, 138 S. E., 1; *Dunn v. Taylor,*187 N. C., 385, 121 S. E., 659.

The order, therefore, from which the defendant appeals, will be stricken out.

Error.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TYREEK WILSON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 115 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 20th day of September, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
#### William R. Olney, Appellant, v. George H. Blasier, Respondent.

Judgment and order reversed and a new trial ordered in Oneida County Court, with costs to abide the event. Opinion by

Hardin, P. J.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Biomoda,  Inc.,
("the  Company")  for the  quarter  ended  March  31,  2006 as  filed  with  the
Securities  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  ("the  Report"),  I, John
Cousins,  Chief  Executive and Financial  Officer of the Company hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




                                 By: /s/John J. Cousins
                                     ------------------
                                     John J. Cousins
                                     Executive Vice President
                                     (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)

                                     October 6, 2006


   A signed original of this written statement required by section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
EXHIBIT C 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4730-3 Filed: 11/14/19 Entered: 11/14/19 14:52:56 Page 1

of 2
EXHIBIT C 

EXPENSE SUMMARY 

SEPTEMBER 1 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2019 

EXPENSES AMOUNTS

Meals $485.62 

Travel – Airfare $10,831.64 

Travel – Hotel $6,747.26 

Travel – Ground (Local) $24.15 

Travel – Ground (Out of Town) $2,358.34 

Copying Charges $4,146.37 

Messenger $502.09 

Air Express $516.74 

Other Expense $105.00 

Total Expenses Requested: $25,717.21 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4730-3 Filed: 11/14/19 Entered: 11/14/19 14:52:56 Page 2

of 2
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350  ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Reef Global Energy IX, L.P. (thePartnership) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (theReport), I, Michael J. Mauceli, principal executive officer of Reef Oil &Gas Partners, L.P., the managing general partner of Reef Global Energy IX,L.P., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)           The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 
| Date:  April 15, 2008 |   | Reef  Oil & Gas Partners, L.P.        |
|----------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------|
|                       |   | Managing  General Partner                      |
|                       |   |                                           |
|                       |   | By:  Reef Oil & Gas Partners, GP, LLC |
|                       |   |                                           |
|                       |   | /s/  Michael J. Mauceli                        |
|                       |   | Michael  J. Mauceli                            |
|                       |   | Manager  and Member                            |
|                       |   | (*Principal Executive Officer*)                |

 

 

Thiscertification is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of thatsection.  This certification is notdeemed to be incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Actof 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Partnershipspecifically incorporates it by reference.

 

----
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4248    Filed: 10/17/19    Entered: 10/17/19 12:18:39    Page 1 of1
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JANUARY 29, 2020

NO. 03-18-00655-CR

Andrew Charles Gibson, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 403RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND SMITH

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of 

conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is 

made.
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Meditecnic, Inc. (the "Company") on Form  10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof  (the "Report"),  I, Luc Badel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Luc Badel

By: Luc Badel

Chief Financial  Officer

December 15, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5730 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5730

      To make nine month foreclosure and eviction protections for 
           servicemembers permanent, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 18, 2014

 Mr. Grayson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To make nine month foreclosure and eviction protections for 
           servicemembers permanent, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NINE MONTH PROTECTIONS FOR MEMBERS OF UNIFORMED SERVICES 
              RELATING TO MORTGAGES, MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE, AND EVICTION 
              MADE PERMANENT.

    (a) Repeal of Revival Provision.--Section 710(d) of the Honoring 
America's Veterans and Caring for Camp Lejeune Families Act of 2012 
(Public Law 112-154; 126 Stat. 1208) is amended by striking paragraph 
(3).
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2285

IDA HAWKINS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GUY GARHEART, in his individual capacity as

Chief of Police; BRUCE HERSHFIELD, Dr., in his

individual capacity as Superintendent, Springfield State Hospital,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

RICKY LEE HINKLE; STATE OF MARYLAND,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frank A. Kaufman, Senior District Judge.

(CA-94-2922-K)

Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: March 29, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Ida Hawkins, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Paul Fletcher-Hill,

Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Hawkins v. Garheart, No. CA-94-2922-K (D. Md. June 6, 1995).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 241 (Friday, December 15, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 64472]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30662]





                Sunshine Act Meetings



Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 241 / Friday, December 15, 1995 / 
Sunshine Act Meetings



[[Page 64472]]




FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

Notice of Agency Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 10:05 a.m. on 
Tuesday, December 12, 1995, the Board of Directors of the Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation met in closed session to consider (1) a 
personnel matter; (2) matters relating to the Corporation's corporate 
and supervisory activities; and (3) an administrative enforcement 
proceeding.
    In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Director 
Eugene A. Ludwig (Comptroller of the Currency), seconded by Vice 
Chairman Andrew C. Hove, Jr., concurred in by Director Jonathan L. 
Fiechter (Acting Director, Office of Thrift Supervision), and Chairman 
Ricki Helfer, that Corporation business required its consideration of 
the matters on less than seven days' notice to the public; that no 
earlier notice of the meeting was practicable; that the public interest 
did not require consideration of the matters in a meeting open to 
public observation; and that the matters could be considered in a 
closed meeting by authority of subsections (c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), 
(c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), and (c)(9)(B) of the ``Government in the 
Sunshine Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), 
(c)(9)(A)(ii), and (c)(9)(B)).
    The meeting was held in the Board Room of the FDIC Building located 
at 550--17th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.

    Dated: December 12, 1995.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,

Deputy Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95-30662 Filed 12-13-95; 2:31 pm]

BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
Exhibit
      32




CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO





18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of Netsmart Technologies, Inc.,
      for the period ended December 31, 2005, I James L. Conway, Chief Executive
      Officer of Netsmart Technologies, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1.  this
      Form
      10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements
      of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and





2.  the
      information contained in this Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of Netsmart Technologies, Inc.





Date:
      March 31, 2006





By: /s/
      James L. Conway


James
      L.
      Conway


Chief
      Executive Officer











In
      connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of Netsmart Technologies, Inc.
      for the period ended December 31, 2005, I, Anthony F. Grisanti, Chief Financial
      Officer of Netsmart Technologies, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1.  this
      Form
      10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements
      of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and





2.  the
      information contained in this Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of Netsmart Technologies, Inc.





Date:
      March 31, 2006







Anthony
      F. Grisanti


Chief
      Financial Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Netsmart Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Netsmart Technologies,
      Inc.
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
Exhibit 33.2
 MANAGEMENTS ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE
 Company
  Platform i e
 Applicable Servicing Criteria
 Period
  
    
    The Companys management is responsible for assessing the Companys compliance with
the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
    
    The Companys management has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the
Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.
    
    Based on such assessment, the Company has complied, in all material respects, with
the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
  CITIBANK, N.A.By:
    /s/  Karen MontbachKaren MontbachIts:              Managing Director
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to

§240.13a14 or §240.15d14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

I, Frank L. Jaksch Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10K of ChromaDex Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. [Intentionally Omitted]

4. [Intentionally Omitted]

5. [Intentionally Omitted]

Date: April 30, 2010



/s/ FRANK L. JAKSCH JR.Frank L. Jaksch Jr.Chief Executive Officer
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 177 Filed: 01/31/19 Entered: 01/31/19 09:33:09 Page 1 of

21
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 177 Filed: 01/31/19 Entered: 01/31/19 09:33:09 Page 2 of

21
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 177 Filed: 01/31/19 Entered: 01/31/19 09:33:09 Page 3 of

21
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 177 Filed: 01/31/19 Entered: 01/31/19 09:33:09 Page 4 of

21
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 177 Filed: 01/31/19 Entered: 01/31/19 09:33:09 Page 5 of

21
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 177 Filed: 01/31/19 Entered: 01/31/19 09:33:09 Page 6 of

21
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 177 Filed: 01/31/19 Entered: 01/31/19 09:33:09 Page 7 of

21
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 177 Filed: 01/31/19 Entered: 01/31/19 09:33:09 Page 8 of

21
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 177 Filed: 01/31/19 Entered: 01/31/19 09:33:09 Page 9 of

21
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 177 Filed: 01/31/19 Entered: 01/31/19 09:33:09 Page 10 of

21
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 177 Filed: 01/31/19 Entered: 01/31/19 09:33:09 Page 11 of

21
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 177 Filed: 01/31/19 Entered: 01/31/19 09:33:09 Page 12 of

21
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 177 Filed: 01/31/19 Entered: 01/31/19 09:33:09 Page 13 of

21
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 177 Filed: 01/31/19 Entered: 01/31/19 09:33:09 Page 14 of

21
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 177 Filed: 01/31/19 Entered: 01/31/19 09:33:09 Page 15 of

21
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 177 Filed: 01/31/19 Entered: 01/31/19 09:33:09 Page 16 of

21
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 177 Filed: 01/31/19 Entered: 01/31/19 09:33:09 Page 17 of

21
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 177 Filed: 01/31/19 Entered: 01/31/19 09:33:09 Page 18 of

21
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 177 Filed: 01/31/19 Entered: 01/31/19 09:33:09 Page 19 of

21
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 177 Filed: 01/31/19 Entered: 01/31/19 09:33:09 Page 20 of

21
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 177 Filed: 01/31/19 Entered: 01/31/19 09:33:09 Page 21 of

21