alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip to main content

# Social Security

Search
Menu
Español
Sign in

## Definition of "award"

Office of the Chief Actuary Award dataBeneficiary data

**Definition**     A person classified as having been *awarded* a benefit     means that the person has become entitled to a certain type of benefit.       This definition encompasses not only newly entitled      beneficiaries, but also cases where a person converts from one      benefit type to another.  An example of such a conversion is a     case where a disabled-worker beneficiary attains the     normal retirement age and     becomes a retired worker.  Another example is a case where a spouse     of a retiree becomes an aged widow(er) upon the death of her or his     spouse.

  Awards encompass individuals with entitlement that is retroactive to the      point at which an award decision has been made, as well as entitlements	 that begin in the same month as the award is effective. Retroactive     entitlements are especially prevalent in claims involving an alleged     disability, as the disability evaluation process can be lengthy, particularly     in cases where the claimant appeals a finding that the claimant is not      disabled. In cases of retroactive entitlement, benefits are payable for     months of entitlement prior to when the award is effective.

  Please keep this definition in mind when accessing our award data. Also     note that our award data is presented on the basis of when the award is      effectuated, and not on any applicable retroactive entitlement date.

Footer menu
#### W. H. LILLY et ux. v. CAMPBELL E. SMITH et ux.

(Filed 1 October, 1930.)

Appeal and Error J e — Where alleged error would not change result of trial the cause will not be remanded.

Where issues submitted to the jury are not in accordance with the theory upon which the case was tried, but the result of the trial agrees with the theory and involves only a question of fact, the case will not be remanded for another hearing.

Appeal by defendants from *Nunn, J.,*at March Term, 1930, of Pitt.

Civil action to recover $900.00, alleged overpayment in the purchase of a lot of land.

The case revolves around an owelty charge against said lot, existing in favor of Mrs. Sadie Lilly, which plaintiffs allege was to be considered as a part of the purchase price and adjusted accordingly. This was denied by the defendants.

From a verdict and judgment for plaintiffs, the defendants appeal, assigning errors.

*Albion Dunn for plaintiffs.*

*Louis W. Gaylord for defendants.*

Peb CubiaM.

The issues submitted are not accordant with the theory upon which the case was tried, but as the result agrees with the theory of the trial and involves only a question of fact, it would apparently serve no useful purpose to remand the cause for another hearing. *Pate v. Gaitley,*183 N. C., 262, 111 S. E., 339.

No error.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                         16,546
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    230,108
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         2,623
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 288,412
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        166,593
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       69
<OTHER-SE>                                     93,111
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   288,412
<SALES>                                        412,092
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               425,295
<CGS>                                          352,390
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  352,390
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               51,006
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                21,899
<INCOME-TAX>                                   8,431
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            13,468
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   13,468
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.58
        


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*John Whitcomb v. John Appleton and others, Commissioners.

Order dismissing relator affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
Amend. 1 to Deferred Compensation Plan



 Exhibit 10.4 (a) 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 TO THE 
 PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY 
 EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

 (Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2009) 
 Pursuant to the provisions of Section 11.4 thereof, the Pioneer Natural Resources Company Executive Deferred Compensation Plan
(Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2009) is hereby amended to add the following sentence to the end of Section 5.1 thereof: 
 For the period beginning January 1, 2005 and ending December 31, 2008, separate subaccounts were established for each Member to reflect the Member’s various Payment Elections for all or certain Plan
Years during such period, as determined in accordance with the Member’s Payment Elections. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this
Amendment has been executed on this 15th day of June, 2009, to be effective January 1, 2009. 
  

			
	PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
		
	 By
	 	 /s/ Larry N. Paulsen

		 	 Larry N. Paulsen
 Vice President, Administration and
Risk Management
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5749 

To clarify membership requirements for the Board of Directors of the Federal 

Deposit Insurance Corporation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 20, 2014 

Mr. LUCAS (for himself and Mr. HECK of Washington) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To clarify membership requirements for the Board of 

Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State Regulatory Rep5 resentation Clarification Act of 2014’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PURPOSES. 

7 The purposes of this Act are— 

8 (1) to reaffirm the importance of having the 

9 perspective of State banking regulators on the Board 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 5749 IH

1 of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Cor2 poration; and 

3 (2) to ensure that the Board of Directors of the 

4 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation includes a 

5 member who has served as a State banking super6 visor. 

7 SEC. 3. STATE BANKING SUPERVISOR EXPERIENCE ON 

8 BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE FEDERAL DE9 POSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION. 

10 Section 2(a)(1)(C) of the Federal Deposit Insurance 

11 Act (12 U.S.C. 1812(a)(1)(C)) is amended by striking 

12 ‘‘State bank supervisory experience’’ and inserting ‘‘served 

13 as a State bank supervisor, as defined in section 3(r)(1) 

14 of this Act’’. 

15 SEC. 4. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION. 

16 Nothing in this Act shall be construed as affecting 

17 the appointment or reappointment of individuals who were 

18 members of the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit 

19 Insurance Corporation as of January 1, 2014. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Skip to main content

# Social Security

Search
Menu
Español
Sign in

## Actuarial Studies

Office of the Chief Actuary 

Actuarial Notes

Studies are historical documents and are generally not subject to revision. 	PDF files may not be accessible to people with visual impairments.

    If you have a question regarding a particular Study, send your question and     the name of the Study to actuary@ssa.gov.

| Number | Date        | Title                                                                                                           | Author(s)                                       |
|--------|-------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
| 124    | April 2018  | Mortality by Career-Average Earnings Level  (PDF)                                                          | Tiffany Bosley, Michael Morris, and Karen Glenn |
| 123    | August 2015 | Social Security Disability Insurance Program Worker Experience  (PDF)                                      | Tim Zayatz                                      |
| 122    | May 2011    | Social Security Disability Insurance Program Worker Experience  (PDF)                                      | Tim Zayatz                                      |
| 121    | June 2011   | Short-Range Actuarial Projections of the Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance Program, 2010  (PDF) | M. Stephens and C. Thomas                       |

Footer menu
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 238 (Tuesday, December 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 63703]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30191]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-66-000]


Mississippi River Transmission Corporation; Notice of Filing

December 6, 1995.
    Take notice that on November 30, 1995, Mississippi River 
Transmission Corporation (MRT) submitted for filing worksheets 
reflecting the calculation of Miscellaneous Revenues in accordance with 
Section 18 of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1. MRT 
states that during the Miscellaneous Revenue Accumulation Periods 
contained in the filing its cashout costs exceeded cashout revenues and 
that no penalty charges were collected from affiliates, resulting in no 
Miscellaneous Revenue Flowthrough Adjustment at this time.
    MRT states that copies of its filing have been mailed to all of its 
affected customers and the State Commissions of Arkansas, Missouri and 
Illinois.
    Any person desiring to be heard or protest the subject filing 
should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.211 and 385.214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214. Pursuant 
to Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations, all such motions or 
protests must be filed not later than 12 days after the date of the 
filing noted above. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-30191 Filed 12-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 238 (Tuesday, December 12, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 63761]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30377]



      


                Sunshine Act Meetings



Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 238 / Tuesday, December 12, 1995 / 
Sunshine Act Meetings



[[Page 63761]]




FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

``FEDERAL REGISTER'' NUMBER: 95-30204.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED DATE AND TIME: Thursday, December 14, 1995, 10:00 
a.m. Meeting Open to the Public.

THE FOLLOWING ITEM WAS ADDED TO THE AGENDA:

Disclaimers Final Rules: Announcement of Effective Date.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Mr. Ron Harris, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 219-4155.
Delores Hardy,

Administrative Assistant.

[FR Doc. 95-30377 Filed 12-8-95 2:46 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
#### M. S. HYDER v. BOARD OF COUNTY ROAD TRUSTEES FOR HENDERSON COUNTY et al.

(Filed 9 December, 1925.)

1. Road Commissioners — Governmental Functions — Negligence.

In the absence of an allegation that road commissioners, exercising governmental functions, have taken personal charge of the work, plaintiff, a convict, was assigned to do, or that they were dealing with same purely as administrative officials, or that they acted corruptly or with malice in their official capacity, when plaintiff was injured by the negligence of one of their employees, no cause of action is stated against them, and a demurrer to the complaint filed on this ground was properly sustained.

S. Appeal and Error — Supreme Court — Per Curiam Opinions — Stare Decisis.

A per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court is a precedent upon the questions therein embraced, and ordinarily is filed where the Court is of one mind and the points of law involved are controlled by previous decisions, or otherwise they are of such a nature as not to require discussion.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Oglesby, J.,*at June Term, 1925, of HeN-DEBSON.

Civil action to recover damages for an alleged negligent injury due to the defendant’s failure, in the exercise of ordinary care, to furnish the plaintiff a reasonably safe place to work and reasonably safe appliances with which to carry on the duties assigned to him as a convict while working on the public roads of Henderson County under the care, custody and. direction of the defendants as members of and constituting the board of county road trustees for Henderson County.

There is no allegation that the defendants had taken personal charge of the work plaintiff was doing or that they were dealing with the same purely as administrative officials; nor is it alleged that they acted corruptly or with malice in their official capacity.

There is an allegation that the defendants were carrying liability insurance upon which plaintiff is entitled to recover, but the action against the defendants is not bottomed on contract, and the insurance company is not a party to the action.

Demurrers were interposed by all of the defendants and sustained upon the ground that the complaint failed to allege a valid cause of action against any of the defendants.

Plaintiff appeals.

*O. V. F. Blythe and A. A. Bice for plaintiff.*

*Frank, Garter and J. E. Shipman for defendants Bane and Wilfong.*

*664Stacy, C. J.,

after stating the case: The judgment sustaining the demurrers must be affirmed on authority of *Jenkins v. Griffith,*189 N. C., 633, and *Hipp v. Fenrall,*173 N. C., 167.

*Jenkins v. Griffith*was written under a *per curiam*opinion, but this in no way impairs its force as a precedent. It is supported by full citation of authorities. Ordinarily, a *per curiam*is the opinion of the Court in a case in which we are all of one mind, and where the questions presented are controlled by previous decisions, or otherwise they are of such a nature that we do not deem it necessary, or beneficial to the profession, to elaborate them by an extended discussion. *Clarke v. Assurance Co.,*146 Pa. St., 561; *Minor v. Fike,*77 Kan., 806, 93 Pac., 264.

Affirmed.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3345 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit contributions and donations by foreign nationals in connection with ballot initiatives and referenda. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 8, 2021 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself and Mr. WARNER) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to 

prohibit contributions and donations by foreign nationals 

in connection with ballot initiatives and referenda. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Ballot 

5 Measures from Foreign Influence Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3345 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON CONTRIBUTIONS AND DONATIONS 

2 BY FOREIGN NATIONALS IN CONNECTION 

3 WITH BALLOT INITIATIVES AND REFERENDA. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 319(a)(1)(A) of the Fed5 eral Election Campaign Act of 1971 (52 U.S.C. 

6 30121(a)(1)(A)) is amended by inserting ‘‘, or a State or 

7 local ballot initiative or ballot referendum’’ after ‘‘elec8 tion’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to contributions 

11 and donations made on or after the date of enactment of 

12 this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,435,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               22,118,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 27,876,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            57,601,000
<PP&E>                                     135,668,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             225,901,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       29,937,000
<BONDS>                                    152,300,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   225,901,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  52,124,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                46,133,000
<SALES>                                      4,722,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,000,000
<CGS>                                       (2,731,000)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 (741,000)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            (1,990,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,000,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,731,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (741,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,990,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,990,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7567]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3096]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Norwest Corporation; Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions 
of Shares of Banks or Bank Holding Companies; Correction

    This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc. 95-2055) published on page 
5396 and 5397 of the issue for Friday, January 27, 1995.
    Under the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis heading, the entries 
for Norwest Corporation, are revised to read as follows:
    1. Norwest Corporation, Minneapolis, Minnesota; to acquire Stan-
Shaw Corporation, Anaheim Hills, California, and thereby engage in 
acting as trustee under deeds of trust, preparing and filing notices of 
default, reconveyances and related documents, pursuant to Sec.  
225.25(b)(3) of the Board's Regulation Y.
    2. Norwest Corporation, Minneapolis, Minnesota; to acquire 
Directors Mortgage Loan Corporation, Riverside, California, and thereby 
engage in (1) the origination, sale and servicing of residential 
single-family, first mortgage loans, the retention, purchase and sale 
of servicing rights associates with such mortgage loans, pursuant to 
Sec.  225.25(b)(1) of the Board's Regulation Y, and (2) the acquisition 
of 24.6 percent of Mission Savings and Loan Association, Riverside, 
California, pursuant to Sec.  225.25(b)(9) of the Board's Regulation Y.
    3. Norwest Corporation, Minneapolis, Minnesota; to acquire 
Directors Insurance Service, Riverside, California, and thereby engage 
in (1) providing, as agent for various insurance underwriters, a full 
line of home mortgage insurance products, including mortgage life, 
flood, and earthquake insurance, pursuant to section 4(c)(8)(G) of the 
Bank Holding Company Act.
    Comments on this application must be received by February 13, 1995.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 2, 
1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-3096 Filed 2-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
<PAGE>   1
                                   Exhibit 21
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                           STATE OF
SUBSIDIARY                               INCORPORATION
----------                               -------------
<S>                                           <C>       
The Canton Oil & Gas Company                  Ohio
                                         
    Target Oilfield Pipe & Supply Company     Ohio
                                         
Ward Lake Drilling, Inc.                      Michigan
                                         
Peake Energy, Inc.                            Delaware
                                         
Engine Power Systems, Inc.                    Ohio
</TABLE>
                                       
As of December 31, 1996, the other subsidiaries included in the registrant's
consolidated financial statements, and all other subsidiaries considered in the
aggregate as a single subsidiary, did not constitute a significant subsidiary.
**KFS** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0 510 STATE OF MONTANA ,

P la intiff and Appell ee , v. ALAN EDWIN ERICKSON ,

Defendant and Appell an

t . **GRANT OF EXTENSION** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is gran ted an extension of time to and including November 6 , 202 3 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court September 27 2023

09/27/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0510
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Don Marcos Trading Co. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Earl
T. Shannon, President, and Scott W. Bodenweber, Chief Financial Officer,
respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
Earl T. Shannon


Earl T.
Shannon,


President


March 31,
2008








/s/
Scott W. Bodenweber


Scott W.
Bodenweber,


Chief
Financial Officer


March 31,
2008