Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 8, 1995 / Rules and Regulations 7443

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

William C. Nelson, Airspace and

Obstruction Evaluation Branch (ATP–

240), Airspace—Rules and Aeronautical

Information Division, Air Traffic Rules

and Procedures Service, Federal

Aviation Administration, 800

Independence Avenue SW.,

Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202)

267–9295.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

On January 13, 1995, the FAA

proposed to amend part 71 of the

Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR

part 71) to modify the Class C airspace

areas at Roanoke Regional/Woodrum

Field, VA, and Rochester-Monroe

County Airport, NY, and to establish a

Class E airspace area at Roanoke

Regional/Woodrum Field, VA (60 FR

3018).

Interested parties were invited to

participate in this rulemaking

proceeding by submitting written

comments on the proposal to the FAA.

No comments were received. Except for

editorial changes, this amendment is the

same as that proposed in the notice.

Class C and E airspace designations are

published in paragraphs 4000 and 6002,

respectively, of FAA Order 7400.9B

dated July 18, 1994, and effective

September 16, 1994, which is

incorporated by reference in 14 CFR

71.1. The Class C and E airspace

designations listed in this document

will be published subsequently in the

Order.

The Rule

This amendment to part 71 of the

Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR

part 71) modifies the Roanoke Regional/

Woodrum Field, VA, Class C airspace

area by amending the effective hours to

coincide with the associated radar

approach control facility’s hours of

operation and by changing the name of

the Rochester-Monroe County Airport to

Greater Rochester International Airport.

This action will not change the

designated boundaries or altitudes of

these Class C airspace areas. In addition,

this action establishes the Roanoke

Regional/Woodrum Field, VA, Class E

airspace area when the associated radar

approach control facility is not in

operation.

The FAA has determined that this

regulation only involves an established

body of technical regulations for which

frequent and routine amendments are

necessary to keep them operationally

current. It, therefore—(1) is not a

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under

Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a

‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)

does not warrant preparation of a

regulatory evaluation as the anticipated

impact is so minimal.

Since this is a routine matter that will

only affect air traffic procedures and air

navigation, it is certified that this rule

will not have a significant economic

impact on a substantial number of small

entities under the criteria of the

Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

Airspace, Incorporation by reference,

Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

In consideration of the foregoing, the

Federal Aviation Administration

amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for 14 CFR

part 71 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. app. 1348(a), 1354(a),

1510; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–

1963 Comp., p. 389; 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 14 CFR

11.69.

§ 71.1 [Amended]

2. The incorporation by reference in

14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation

Administration Order 7400.9B, Airspace

Designations and Reporting Points,

dated July 18, 1994, and effective

September 16, 1994, is amended as

follows:

Paragraph 4000—Subpart C-Class C Airspace

* * * * *

AEA NY C Greater Rochester International

Airport, NY (Revised)

Greater Rochester International Airport, NY

(Lat. 43°07′08′′ N., long. 77°40′21′′ W.)

That airspace extending upward from the

surface to and including 4,600 feet MSL

within a 5-mile radius of the Greater

Rochester International Airport; and that

airspace extending upward from 2,100 feet

MSL to 4,600 feet MSL within a 10-mile

radius of the airport.

* * * * *

AEA VA C Roanoke Regional/Woodrum

Field, VA (Revised)

Roanoke Regional/Woodrum Field, VA

(Lat. 37°19′31′′ N., long. 79°58′31′′ W.)

That airspace extending upward from the

surface to and including 5,200 feet MSL

within a 5-mile radius of the Roanoke

Regional/Woodrum Field; and that airspace

extending upward from 3,800 feet MSL to

and including 5,200 feet MSL within a 10-

mile radius of the airport from the 004°

bearing from the airport clockwise to the 104°

bearing from the airport; and that airspace

extending upward from 3,400 feet MSL to

and including 5,200 feet MSL from the 104°

bearing from the airport clockwise to a line

formed by a point at the 274° bearing from

the airport at 5 miles direct to a point at the

257° bearing from the airport at 10 miles.

This Class C airspace area is effective during

the specific dates and times established in

advance by a Notice to Airmen. The effective

date and time will thereafter be continuously

published in the Airport/Facility Directory.

* * * * *

Paragraph 6002—Class E Airspace Areas

Designated as a Surface Area for an Airport

* * * * *

AEA VA E2 Roanoke Regional/Woodrum

Field, VA (New)

Roanoke Regional/Woodrum Field, VA

(Lat. 37°19′31′′ N., long. 79°58′31′′ W.)

Within a 5-mile radius of the Roanoke

Regional/Woodrum Field. This Class E

airspace area is effective during the specific

dates and times established in advance by a

Notice to Airmen. The effective date and time

will thereafter be continuously published in

the Airport/Facility Directory.

* * * * *

Issued in Washington, DC, on February 1,

1995.

Nancy B. Kalinowski,

Acting Manager, Airspace—Rules and

Aeronautical Information Division.

[FR Doc. 95–3120 Filed 2–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

Bureau of Consular Affairs

22 CFR Part 43

[Public Notice 2163]

Visas: Documentation of Immigrants

Under Section 132 of Public Law 101–

649, as Amended

AGENCY: Bureau of Consular Affairs,

Department of State.

ACTION: Interim rule, with request for

comments.

SUMMARY: Pub. L. 103–416, the Act of

October 25, 1994, the Immigration and

Nationality Technical Corrections Act of

1994, further amends section 132 of

Public Law 101–649 to authorize the

issuance during Fiscal Year 1995 of

those immigrant visas authorized during

the three fiscal years of the Transitional

Diversity Program but not used during

that period. The amendments became

effective upon signature and the

available visas are to be issued during

the Fiscal Year now in progress.

Accordingly, the Department is

promulgating an interim rule in order to

create a basis for initiating the necessary

processing and inviting comments.

DATES: This rule is effective February 8,

1995. Interested persons are invited to
7444 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 8, 1995 / Rules and Regulations

submit written comments on or before

March 10, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Written comments, with a

reference to this rule to ensure proper

and timely handling, may be submitted

in duplicate to the Director, Office of

Legislation, Regulations, and Advisory

Assistance, Visa Office, Department of

State, Washington, DC, 20522–0113.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Cornelius D. Scully, III, Director, Office

of Legislation, Regulations, and

Advisory Assistance, Bureau of

Consular Affairs, (202) 663–1184.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

General

Section 217 of Pub. L. 103–416

amends section 132 of Pub. L. 101–649

to extend the life of the provision

through fiscal year 1995. Section 132

provided for the issuance of specified

amounts of immigrant visas during

fiscal years 1992, 1993, and 1994. This

program came to be known as the AA–

1 program, from the entry code used by

INS to identify for statistical purposes

admissions of aliens who qualified

under the program. Natives of specified

countries were authorized to compete

for consideration during each of the

three years by applying during an

application period established for each

of the years. The annual limitation was

set at 40,000 with not less than 40%—

16,000—reserved for natives of Ireland.

Section 132 was amended to modify

the provision in several respects for the

second and third years. Pertinent here

were amendments which authorized the

total of visas unused in the first or

second fiscal year to be added to the

total for the second or third year, as

applicable, and which authorized the

total reserved for natives of Ireland to be

increased in the second and third years

by the shortfall in usage by natives of

Ireland in the preceding year.

Section 217 of Pub. L. 103–416 further

extends this program but does so in a

very limited way. First, the numerical

limitation for fiscal year 1995 is

established as solely the total of

immigrant visas unused in the program

during fiscal year 1994. There is no new

annual limitation of 40,000.

Second, aliens entitled to compete for

the available visas will be limited to

those who are natives of countries

qualified under this program who also

have applied for consideration under

the new Diversity Lottery provided for

in section 203(c) of the Immigration and

Nationality Act, as amended, and in

section 42.33 of Title 22, United States

Code. There will be no new mail-in

period to allow aliens to apply to

compete for the visas available under

this extension.

Finally, aliens entitled to compete for

the AA–1 program numbers available

during fiscal year 1995 will not have to

present evidence of a firm commitment

for employment in the U.S., but will be

subject to the requirement established

by section 203(c)(2) for applicants under

the Diversity Lottery—a showing that

they have at least a high school

education or its equivalent or that,

within the preceding five years, they

have had at least two years of work

experience in an occupation requiring at

least two years of training or experience.

Numerical Limitation and Its

Apportionment

As pointed out above, the numerical

limitation for fiscal year 1995 is limited

to the number of immigrant visas which

were available during the previous fiscal

years but not used during those years.

The total unused was 1,404. Thus,

during fiscal year 1995 1,404 visas will

be available to natives of qualifying

countries.

Now, the apportionment of that total

is interesting. Section 132(c) specifies

that a minimum of 40 percent of a fiscal

year limitation shall be made available

to natives of the foreign state which

received the greatest number of visas

under the program established by

section 314 of the Immigration Reform

and Control Act. That same section, as

amended, also provides that, if usage of

visas by natives of that foreign state falls

short of the total available in a fiscal

year, the amount of shortfall is to be

added to the 40 percent minimum

during the next fiscal year.

The foreign state so described was

Ireland. Application of the above rules

to the available numbers produces the

following results—

40 percent of 1404=562 (rounded to the

nearest whole number)

Visas reserved for natives of Ireland, FY

94—22,555

Visas actually used by natives of

Ireland, FY 94—21,804

Shortfall for FY 94—751

Visas available for natives of Ireland, FY

95—562+751=1,313

Visas available for natives of other

qualifying countries—91.

Section 217 also provides that any

visas available to natives of countries

other than Ireland are to be distributed

among the regions established under the

Diversity Lottery in proportion to the

usage by region of visas under the AA–

1 program during fiscal years 1992 and

1993. Regionally, the usage during the

two fiscal years cited was distributed as

follows:

Europe—85.93%

Asia—11.51%

South America, Mexico, Central

America, and the Caribbean—2.02%

Africa—0.54%

It will be noted that two of the six

regions established for Diversity Lottery

purposes are not listed above—North

America and Oceania. No countries in

the Oceania region qualified for

participation in the AA–1 program and,

thus, usage of visas by natives of

countries in that region was necessarily

zero.

The omission of North America has a

different basis. The only two countries

in the region are Canada and the

Bahamas. Canada was a country which

qualified for the AA–1 program in fiscal

year 1993, although not in fiscal year

1992. On the other hand, Canada does

not qualify for participation in the DV–

1 lottery and, thus, the Bahamas is the

only country in the North America

Region which does qualify. The

Bahamas was not, however, a country

which qualified to participate in the

AA–1 program. For this reason, natives

of the Bahamas who applied for the DV–

1 lottery could not be issued AA–1 visas

under this carry-over provision.

Accordingly, the Department did not

take into account usage by North

America in determining how to

apportion the 91 visas available for

natives of AA–1 countries other than

Ireland.

Apportioning the 91 visas among the

four regions in accordance with the

percentages indicated above produces

the following numbers—

Europe—78

Asia—10

South America, Mexico, Central

America, and the Caribbean—2

Africa—1

Selection of Immigrants

Small as the numbers of visas

available under this provision are, the

question of how to select recipients has

been troublesome. Section 217 itself

prohibits any separate mail-in to

compete for these visas and requires

that recipients be selected from among

those who applied to compete for

selection in the fiscal year 1995

Diversity Lottery. By the time section

217 was enacted, the mail-in period for

that lottery was complete, the computergenerated random selection had been

made and notifications had been sent to

the winners. The Department’s decision

as to how to handle selection of the

recipients of these visas has been

heavily influenced by that fact.

First, as to non-Irish competitors for

these visas, the number of registrants for
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 8, 1995 / Rules and Regulations 7445

the Diversity Lottery is so large

compared to the visas available that it

will not be necessary to go beyond those

already registered and notified of their

qualification to compete in the Diversity

Lottery. The Department envisions that

the visas available for each region will

be made available according to regional

rank order numbers to natives of AA–1

qualifying countries who are

determined to be ineligible to receive a

DV–1 visa under section 212(a)(6)(C) or

212(e), or who could not obtain a DV–

1 visa because of the regional or

percentage limitation.

The situation regarding Irish Diversity

Lottery applicants is rather different.

The number of aliens registered for the

Diversity Lottery who could compete for

the 1,313 Irish visas is only 2,416—

2,151 from the Republic of Ireland; 265

from Northern Ireland. [In the AA–1

program, Northern Ireland was required

by law to be treated as part of Ireland.

In the Diversity Program, Northern

Ireland is required by law to be treated

as a separate foreign state.] Given the

very high percentage of natives of

Ireland who were registered for visas

under the AA–1 program but failed to

pursue their applications, the

Department believes that it is necessary

to register additional Irish applicants

beyond those registered for the DV–1

program for the express purpose of

producing a pool of Irish applicants

sufficient to ensure use of all the AA–

1 visa numbers carried over from the

previous fiscal years.

Accordingly, the Department is

registering an additional quantity of

natives of Ireland beyond those

registered for competition for the

Diversity visas. These applicants will

not compete for Diversity visas as their

rank order numbers will not justify

permitting them to do so. They will,

however, compete for the 1,313 AA–1

visas carried over to the current fiscal

year.

Interim Rule

The implementation of this rule, with

provision for post-promulgation public

comments, is based upon the ‘‘good

cause’’ exception found at 5 U.S.C. 553

(b)(B) and 553(d)(3). The amendments

authorizing the Department to continue

issuing visas under the Transitional

Diversity Program throughout fiscal year

1995 took effect October 25, 1994.

This rule is not expected to have a

significant impact on a substantial

number of small entities under the

criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

In addition, this rule would not impose

information collection requirements

under the provisions of the Paperwork

Reduction Act of 1980. This rule has

been reviewed as required under E.O.

12778 and certified to be in compliance

therewith. This rule is exempt from

review under E.O. 12866, but has been

reviewed internally by the Department

to ensure consistency with the

objectives thereof.

List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 43

Aliens, Immigrants, Numerical

limitations, Registration, Visas.

Accordingly, title 22, part 43 of the

Code of Federal Regulations, is

amended as follows:

PART 43—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 43 is

revised to read:

Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1104; 8 U.S.C. 1153

note, 108 Stat. 4315.

2. Part 43 is amended by adding a

new subpart C to read as follows:

Subpart C—Documentation of Immigrants

Under Section 217 of Public Law 103–416

Sec.

43.21 General.

43.22 Definitions.

43.23 Eligibility for consideration.

43.24 Order of consideration.

43.25 Numerical limitations.

43.26 Fees.

43.27 Eligibility to receive a visa.

§ 43.21 General.

Except as specifically provided in this

subpart, the provisions of the

Immigration and Nationality Act, as

amended, and of parts 40 and 42 of this

chapter shall apply to application for,

consideration of, and issuance or refusal

of, immigrant visas under section 217 of

Pub. L. 103–416.

§ 43.22 Definitions.

The definitions set forth in paragraphs

(a), (c) and (d) of § 43.12 shall apply to

application for, consideration of, and

issuance or refusal of, immigrant visas

under section 217 of Pub. L. 103–416.

§ 43.23 Eligibility for consideration.

(a) Natives of adversely affected

foreign states other than Ireland.

Natives of adversely affected foreign

states other than Ireland shall be eligible

for consideration for issuance of a visa

under this subpart only if they have

been registered for consideration for

issuance of a visa during fiscal year

1995 under section 203(c) of the

Immigration and Nationality Act, as

amended.

(b) Natives of Ireland. Natives of

Ireland, as that country is defined in

§ 43.12(d) shall be eligible for

consideration for issuance of a visa

under this 103–416.

(1) They have been registered for

consideration for issuance of a visa

under section 203(c) of the Immigration

and Nationality Act, as amended; or

(2) They have been separately

registered for this purpose from among

those natives of Ireland who petitioned

for consideration under section 203(c) of

the Immigration and Nationality Act, as

amended, but were not selected under

the procedures established under

§ 42.33.

§ 43.24 Order of consideration.

(a) Natives of Ireland. Consideration

for issuance of a visa under this subpart

shall be given to natives of Ireland in

order of diversity rank number whose

application for a visa under section

203(c) of the Immigration and

Nationality Act, as amended, has been

refused under section 212(a)(6)(C) or

212(e) of such Act, or both, or whose

application could not be processed to a

conclusion because of the applicable

regional or foreign state limitation. Such

consideration shall thereafter be given

to natives of Ireland separately

registered for this purpose as provided

in § 43.23(b)(2) and such consideration

shall be given in the rank order

established by such registration.

(b) Natives of adversely affected

countries other than Ireland.

Consideration for issuance of a visa

under this subpart shall be given to

natives of adversely affected countries

other than Ireland in order of regional

diversity rank number whose

application for a visa under section

203(c) of the Immigration and

Nationality Act, as amended, has been

refused under section 212(a)(6)(C) or

212(e) of such Act, or both, or whose

application registered for consideration

for issuance of a visa under such section

203(c) could not be processed to a

conclusion because of the applicable

regional or foreign state limitation.

§ 43.25. Numerical limitations.

(a) Centralized control. Centralized

control of the numerical limitations

established pursuant to section 217 of

Pub. L. 103–416 and this subpart is

established in the Department.

(b) Numerical limitation for natives of

Ireland. The numerical limitation for

natives of Ireland shall be determined

by multiplying by 0.40 the number of

immigrant visas available under section

132 of Pub. L. 101–649 during fiscal

year 1994 to natives of adversely

affected countries which were not used

by such natives and by adding to the

result of that calculation the number of

visas available under such section 132

during fiscal year 1994 to natives of

Ireland which were not used by such

natives.
7446 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 8, 1995 / Rules and Regulations

(c) Numerical limitation for natives of

adversely affected countries other than

Ireland.

(1) Overall. The overall numerical

limitation for natives of adversely

affected countries other than Ireland

shall be the difference between the total

number of visas available under section

132 of Pub. L. 101–649 during fiscal

year 1994 but not used during such

fiscal year and the number computed

pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section.

(2) Regional apportionment. The

overall numerical limitation determined

as provided in paragraph (c)(1) of this

section shall be apportioned among the

regions established by section

203(c)(1)(F) of the Immigration and

Nationality Act, as amended, as

follows—Africa: 0.54%; Asia: 11.51%;

Europe: 85.93%; North America—none;

Oceania: None; and South America,

Mexico, Central America, and the

Caribbean; 2.02%.

(d) Allocation of immigrant visa

numbers. Within the limitations

specified in paragraphs (b) and (c) of

this section, the Department shall

allocate immigrant visa numbers for use

in connection with the issuance of

immigrant visas and the granting of

adjustment of status.

§ 43.26 Fees.

An applicant who is to be given

consideration under this subpart and

who is notified or otherwise informed

thereof shall remit to the Department a

fee of $25 in such manner as the

Department shall specify in the

notification or other communication to

the applicant. The fee shall be $25

regardless of whether or not the

applicant has a spouse and/or child(ren)

who intend to accompany or follow to

join the applicant. The remittance shall

be negotiable in such form as the

Department shall specify.

§ 43.27 Eligibility to receive a visa.

The eligibility of an applicant for a

visa under section 217 of Pub. L 103–

416 shall be determined as provided in

the Immigration and Nationality Act, as

amended, and parts 40 and 42 of

subchapter E-Visas except that—

(a) Section 212(e) of the Immigration

and Nationality Act, as amended, shall

not apply to such an applicant; and

(b) The provisions of § 40.105 of this

chapter shall apply to such an

applicant.

Dated: February 2, 1995.

Mary A. Ryan,

Assistant Secretary for Consular Affairs.

[FR Doc. 95–3004 Filed 2–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710–06–P

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Office of the Attorney General

28 CFR Part 64

[AG Order No. 1947–95]

Designation of Officers and Employees

of the United States for Coverage

Under Section 1114 of Title 18 of the

United States Code

AGENCY: Department of Justice.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: Part 64 of title 28, Code of

Federal Regulations, designates

categories of federal officers and

employees who, in addition to those

already designated by statute, warrant

the protective coverage of federal

criminal law. This designation confers

federal jurisdiction to prosecute the

killing, attempted killing, kidnaping,

forcible assault, intimidation or

interference with any of the federal

officers or employees designated by this

regulation while they are engaged in or

on account of the performance of their

official duties. This order adds to the

list of covered federal officers and

employees federal administrative law

judges not previously covered and

employees of the Office of Workers’

Compensation Programs of the

Department of Labor who adjudicate

and administer claims under the Federal

Employees’ Compensation Act, the

Longshore and Harbor Workers’

Compensation Act and its extension,

and the Black Lung Benefits Act. The

order also makes technical corrections

and deletes duplicative designations.

DATES: This final rule is effective

February 8, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mary Incontro, Deputy Chief, or

Stephen M. Weglian, Attorney,

Terrorism and Violent Crime Section,

Criminal Division, Department of

Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530,

telephone (202) 514–0849.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Part K of

chapter X of the Comprehensive Crime

Control Act of 1984, Pub. L. 98–473,

title II, § 1012, 98 Stat. 1976, 2142

(1984), amended 18 U.S.C. 1114, which

prohibits the killing of designated

federal employees, to authorize the

Attorney General to add by regulation

other federal personnel who will be

protected by this section. The categories

of federal officers and employees

covered by section 1114 are also

protected, while engaged in or on

account of the performance of their

official duties, from a conspiracy to kill,

18 U.S.C. 1117; kidnaping, 18 U.S.C.

1201(a)(5); forcible assault, interference,

or intimidation, 18 U.S.C. 111; and

threat of assault, kidnap or murder with

intent to impede, intimidate, or retaliate

against such officer or employee, 18

U.S.C. 115.

In order to implement this legislation

initially, the Department conducted a

survey of all federal agencies to

determine which federal employees,

other than those already listed in 18

U.S.C. 1114, should be protected under

the statute. The result of this survey was

the promulgation of Attorney General

Order No. 1177–87, 52 FR 4767,

February 17, 1987, creating 28 CFR part

64. Section 64.1 states the purpose of

the regulation. Section 64.2 originally

listed 21 categories of federal employees

who were considered appropriate for

coverage under section 1114 and the

other statutory provisions. Consistent

with the purpose and legislative history

of section 1114, these categories of

federal employees were selected

because their jobs involve inspection,

investigative or other law enforcement

responsibility or their work involves a

substantial degree of physical danger

from the public and may not be

adequately addressed by available state

or local law enforcement resources. Part

64 has been amended four times to add

additional categories of personnel

(Attorney General Order No. 1326–89,

54 FR 9043, March 3, 1989; Attorney

General Order No. 1394–90, 55 FR 3945,

February 6, 1990; Attorney General

Order No. 1508–91, 56 FR 32327, July

16, 1991; Attorney General Order No.

1636–92, 57 FR 56444, November 30,

1992).

Attorney General Order No. 1636–92

established an interim rule that, besides

making various technical modifications

to Part 64, added these categories of

employees: (1) attorneys and employees

assigned to perform or to assist in

performing, investigative, inspection or

audit functions of the Office of the

Inspector General of certain designated

Federal entities as that term is defined

by section 8E of the Inspector General

Act of 1978, as amended, 5 U.S.C. App

3 section 8E, and of the Merit Systems

Protection Board and the Selective

Service System; (2) attorneys,

accountants, investigators,

administrative judges and other

employees of the U.S. Securities and

Exchange Commission assigned to

perform or to assist in performing

investigative, inspection or other law

enforcement functions; (3) biologists

and technicians of the U.S. Fish and

Wildlife Service who are participating

in sea lamprey control operations; (4)

officers and employees of the Federal

Aviation Administration, the Federal