alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.7


 


Confidential


 


EFFECTIVE DATE: JUNE 30, 2022


 


		RE:	Extension of Maturity Date



 


This
letter amendment is in reference to that certain Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase
Agreement”), dated as of November 7, 2016, entered into by RW National Holdings,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“RWN”),
RW OpCo, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“OpCo,”
and together with RWN, “Borrowers”),
and St. Cloud Capital Partners III SBIC, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“Purchaser”),
as amended by that certain Omnibus Amendment to Securities Purchase Agreement and 12% Secured Promissory Note, dated May 16, 2022 (the
“Amendment”). Unless the context
herein otherwise indicates, capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given to such terms in the
Purchase Agreement, as amended by the Amendment.


 


As of the Effective
Date, Purchaser hereby agrees that the definition of “Due Date” in Section 4.1(2) of the Amendment is hereby amended
to mean August 31, 2023.


 


Except as set
forth in this letter amendment, all other terms, conditions and provisions of the Purchase Agreement and Amendment shall remain unaffected,
and in full force and effect. This letter may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which when executed and delivered shall
be deemed an original, but all of which when taken together shall constitute one and the same letter. A party may execute this letter
via delivery of an executed counterpart hereof by facsimile or electronic mail (i.e. PDF) and such facsimile or electronic signatures
shall be treated as original signatures for all purposes.


 


[REMAINDER OF PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY
BLANK]


 







     


     


    

 


Please
evidence your agreement to the above by exectuing and retuning a copy of this letter amendment to the undersigned.


 


	Very truly yours,	 
	 	 
	ST. CLOUD CAPITAL
    PARTNERS III SBIC, L.P.	 
	 	 
	By: SCGP III SBIC,
    LLC, its general partner	 
	 	 
	By:	/s/ Kacy Rozelle	 
	Name: 	Kacy
    Rozelle	 
	Title: 	Managing Member	 






 


[Acknowledgement
and Consent Pages Follow]


 




    2


     


    

 


	Acknowledged and agreed as of the
    Execution Date:		 
	 	 	 
	BORROWERS:	RW NATIONAL HOLDINGS, LLC
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    Christopher Laurence
	 	Name: 	Christopher Laurence
	 	Title:	Chief Executive Officer
	 	 	 
	 	RW OPCO, LLC
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Christopher
    Laurence
	 	Name:	Christopher Laurence
	 	Title:	Chief Executive Officer
	 	 	 
	SPONSOR:	NORTHERN PACIFIC GROUP
		 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Scott
    Honour
	 	Name:	Scott Honour
	 	Title:	Managing Partner



 


 


3
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES 

TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

J.C., MOTHER OF J.W. AND

H.S., CHILDREN,

Appellant, 

v. Case No. 5D22-2774

LT Case No. 2016-DP-5

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN 

AND FAMILIES AND

GUARDIAN AD LITEM, 

Appellees. 

________________________________/

Decision filed June 1, 2023

Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Hernando County, 

Stephen E. Toner, Jr., Judge. 

J.C., Mother, Quincy, pro se. 

Stephanie C. Zimmerman, Deputy Director 

& Statewide Director of Appeals, of Children’s 

Legal Services, Bradenton, and Rachel Batten, 

of Children’s Legal Services, Brooksville, for 

Appellee, Department of Children and Families. 

Sara E. Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, 

and Amanda Victoria Glass, Senior Attorney, of 

Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, 

for Appellee, Guardian ad Litem. 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. 

BOATWRIGHT, KILBANE and MACIVER, JJ., concur.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5711 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to extend the coverage of the Federal 

prohibition against hate crimes in order to provide greater protections 

to persons who are gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 14, 2014 

Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania (for himself, Ms. SCHWARTZ, Mr. MEEHAN, and 

Mr. FATTAH) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to extend the coverage of the Federal prohibition against hate crimes in 

order to provide greater protections to persons who are 

gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF COVERAGE OF SECTION 249 OF 

4 TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE. 

5 Section 249(a)(2) of title 18, United States Code, is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘in sub8 paragraph (b) or’’; and 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5711 IH

1 (2) by striking subparagraph (B). 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.

  Re: GSAMP Trust 2007-NC1 (the "Trust") Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,
   Series 2007-NC1, issued pursuant to the Pooling and
  Servicing Agreement, dated as of February 1, 2007 (the "Pooling and
  Servicing Agreement"), among GS Mortgage Securities Corp., as
  Depositor, NC Capital Coprporation, as Responsible Party, New Century
  Mortgage Corporation, as a Servicer, Avelo Mortgage, L.L.C., as a
  Servicer, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Custodian, LaSalle
  Bank National Association, as Trustee, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as
  Securities Administrator and Master Servicer, GSAMP Trust 2007-NC1

  I, Michelle Gill, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K ("Annual Report"), and
    all reports on Form 10-D (collectively with this Annual Report, the
    "Reports") required to be filed in respect of period covered by this
    Annual Report, of the Trust;

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Reports, taken as a whole, do not contain
    any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
    circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
    with respect to the period covered by this Annual Report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this Annual Report is included in the Reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the compliance statements required in this
    Annual Report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
    in the Reports, each Servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the
    Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria required to be
    included in this Annual Report in accordance with Item 1122 of
    Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been
    included as an exhibit to this Annual Report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this Annual Report. Any material instances of
    non-compliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this
    Annual Report.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells
    Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master Servicer and Securities Administrator.

    Dated:   March 31, 2008


    /s/ Michelle Gill

    Michelle Gill
    Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
#### Willie Reed TAYLOR et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COAHOMA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 77-2838.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 28, 1978.

*106Alvin O. Chambliss, Jr., Oxford, Miss., Thomas Morris, Cleveland, Miss., Melvyn Leventhal, Jack Greenberg, Jonathan Shapiro, James M. Nabrit, III, New York City, Reuben V. Anderson, Fred L. Banks, Jr., Jackson, Miss., Michael B. Trister, Research Project, Washington, D. C., Armand Derfner, James A. Lewis, Jackson, Miss., Charles Victor McTeer, Greenville, Miss., A. Jane Heidelberg, Cleve McDowell, Clarksdale, Miss., for plaintiffs-appellants.

William H. Maynard, William Bradley, Clarksdale, Miss., Don P. Lacy, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, Miss., for defendants-appellees.

Before GOLDBERG, CLARK and RONEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Coahoma County School District has been operating under a district court desegregation order since 1969. On January 28, 1977, the school board petitioned the court for permission to close Hull Elementary School and to transfer its students to neighboring schools. The court provided appellants an opportunity to file objections, and appellants failed to do so. On February 10, 1977, the court issued an order permitting the closing of the school.

On July 1, 1977, appellants filed a motion to enjoin the closing of Hull. The district court held a hearing on the motion and denied relief. The court found that the substantial decline in enrollment in the school system in general, and in the Hull School in particular, necessitated the closing of Hull for economic reasons. The court further found that there was no evidence to show that this action would have any racial impact or result in discrimination against the black students in Coahoma County. Appellants now appeal from the denial of relief.

We have carefully examined the record and the court’s findings and conclude that the court’s judgment must be affirmed. There is absolutely no indication in the record that the closing of Hull will have any racial impact. At present, 90% of the children attending schools in the district are black. Even in the elementary school with the largest concentration of white students in the county, only 22% of the student population is white. In 1975 only 2 of 210 students at Hull were white. Appellants admit that the decline in enrollment necessitates some action by the school board. Yet they do not even suggest an alternative to closing Hull which would provide students formerly attending Hull with an integrated education. No such alternative is apparent from the record.

Since 1969, Judge Smith has attentively and meticulously supervised the actions of school officials to ensure compliance with his desegregation order. His efforts are to be commended. In the case at bar, Judge Smith reviewed the proposal to close the school in question and concluded that the board’s action would have no racial or discriminatory impact. The record overwhelmingly supports this conclusion. The judgment of the district court is therefore

AFFIRMED.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JOHN ANTHONY DECESARE, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-3695

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed October 19, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk 

County; James A. Yancey, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Richard J. Sanders, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Susan D. Dunlevy, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

NORTHCUTT, CASANUEVA, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# USSPACECOM, NATO leaders affirm cooperation at Space Symposium 39

U.S. Space Command

                COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo.  –              Uruguay and BrazilExercise Global Sentinel 24

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO

. 09

- 1 4

- 00 113

- C R



### ____________________

BELAL ABEL RAHIM

, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On A ppeal from the 411th District Court

Polk County, Texas

Trial Cause No

. 19680

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Belal Abel Rahim has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. See Tex. R. App.

P. 42.2. A request to dismiss the appeal is signed by appellant personally and

joined by counsel of record. No opinion has issued in this appeal. The motion is

granted, and the appeal is theref ore dismissed.

APPEAL DISMISSED.2 ______________________________ H OLLIS HORTON

Justice

Opinion Delivered May 7, 2014

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson , JJ.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### APPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT

METRO THEODORE BUTNER,

Appellant,
v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. Case No. 2D20-3077 September 17, 2021 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Larry Helms, Judge. Loren D. Rhoton, Tampa, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David Campbell, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. MORRIS, C.J., KELLY, and SMITH, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 240 (Thursday, December 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 64165]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30440]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Spencer Bancorporation, Inc., Employee Stock Ownership Plan & 
Trust; Change in Bank Control Notice


Acquisition of Shares of Banks or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificant listed below has applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on notices are set forth in 
paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notice is available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. Once the notice has been accepted for 
processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices of 
the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in 
writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for the notice or to the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than 
December 29, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (James A. Bluemle, Vice 
President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690:
    1. Spencer Bancorporation, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan & 
Trust, Spencer, Wisconsin; to acquire an additional 5.40 percent, for a 
total of 12.25 percent of the voting shares of Spencer Bancorporation, 
Inc., Spencer, Wisconsin, and thereby indirectly acquire Spencer State 
Bank, Spencer, Wisconsin.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 8, 
1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-30440 Filed 12-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
Exhibit 10.40
 RESIGNATION AGREEMENT  AND GENERAL RELEASE OF CLAIMS
        1




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



However, the Company does not guarantee any particular tax effect for income provided to
Executive pursuant to this Agreement.
  EXECUTIVE UNDERSTANDS THAT HE SHOULD CONSULT WITH AN ATTORNEY PRIOR TO SIGNING THIS AGREEMENT
AND THAT HE IS GIVING UP ANY LEGAL CLAIMS HE HAS AGAINST THE PARTIES RELEASED ABOVE BY SIGNING THIS
AGREEMENT. EXECUTIVE FURTHER UNDERSTANDS THAT HE MAY HAVE UP TO 21 DAYS TO CONSIDER THIS
AGREEMENT, THAT HE MAY REVOKE IT AT ANY TIME DURING THE 7 DAYS AFTER HE SIGNS IT, AND THAT IT SHALL
NOT BECOME EFFECTIVE UNTIL THAT 7-DAY PERIOD HAS PASSED. EXECUTIVE ACKNOWLEDGES THAT HE IS SIGNING
THIS AGREEMENT KNOWINGLY, WILLINGLY AND VOLUNTARILY IN EXCHANGE FOR THE BENEFITS DESCRIBED IN
PARAGRAPH 4.
 4




---



##### 



Dated:
April 24, 2008
    /s/ Victor Viegas
Victor ViegasDated:
April , 2008
    IMMERSION CORPORATIONBY:
    /s/ Jack L Saltich
 5
733 A.2d 491

#### ANNA GALLAGHER, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. BURDETTE-TOMLIN MEDICAL HOSPITAL, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND HOWARD R. GOLDSTEIN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-MOVANTS.

April 30, 1999.

Leave to appeal is granted.
Skip to main content

# Social Security

Search
Menu
Español
Sign in

##  Countable Income for SSI Program

Office of the Chief Actuary 

Automatic Determinations

SSI Annual Report

SSI payment standard

**Income definition**     Income is anything you receive during a calendar month and     can use to meet your needs for food or shelter. It may be     in cash or in kind. In-kind income is not cash; it is food or     shelter, or something you can use to get food or shelter.

**Countable Income definition**     Countable income is the amount left over after:      -  Eliminating from consideration all items that are not income; and
-  Applying all  appropriate exclusions  to          the items that are income.
     Countable income is determined on a calendar month basis. It is the     amount actually subtracted from the maximum Federal     benefit to determine your eligibility and to compute your monthly     payment amount.

**Student earned income exclusion**     Of the several income exclusions      that may apply, only one — the student     earned income exclusion — has maximum amounts which increase     with the cost of living as measured by the COLA.     This exclusion applies to a blind or disabled child who is a student      regularly attending school, college, or university, or a course of      vocational or technical training.

Footer menu
Exhibit 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report of Casey Container, Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Martin R Nason,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Martin R Nason
----------------------------------
Martin R Nason
Chief Financial Officer
March 31, 2011

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19-1884V

(not to be published)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

JUANITA CHAPLIN,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

Special Master Katherine E. Oler

Filed: December 30, 2021

Order Concluding Proceedings;

Vaccine Rule 21(a).

Patrick Hughes, Patriots Law Group of Lyons & Hughes, P.C., Suitland, MD, for Petitioner 

Nancy Tinch, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS1

On December 28, 2021, pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a)(1)(B), the parties filed a joint 

stipulation stating that the above-captioned case should be dismissed. ECF No. 39. 

Accordingly, pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a)(3), the above-captioned case is hereby 

dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is hereby instructed that a judgment shall 

not enter in the instant case pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a).

Any questions regarding this Order may be directed to my law clerk, Sydney Lee, by 

telephone at 202-357-6347, or by email at Sydney_Lee@cfc.uscourts.gov. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

s/ Katherine E. Oler

Katherine E. Oler

Special Master

1 Although this Decision has been formally designated “not to be published,” it will nevertheless be posted 

on the Court of Federal Claims’ website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, 44 U.S.C. § 

3501 (2012). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. As 

provided by 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B), however, the parties may object to the decision’s inclusion of 

certain kinds of confidential information. Specifically, under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has fourteen 

days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret 

or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files 

or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” 

Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the Decision in its present form will be available. Id.