alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
First Department,

October Term, 1885.

#### *In the Matter of the Application of Henry B. Laidlaw, late Chamberlain.

*

 Decision handed down July 17, 1885.

Motion granted.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with this annual
report of ChromaDex Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending January 2, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Frank L. Jaksch Jr., Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and Thomas C. Varvaro, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 31, 2010

/s/ FRANK L. JAKSCH JR

Frank L. Jaksch Jr.

Chief Executive Officer

/s/ THOMAS C. VARVARO

Thomas C. Varvaro

Chief Financial Officer
Skip to main content

# Social Security

Search
Menu
Español
Sign in

## Social Security Beneficiary Data

Office of the Chief Actuary 

Beneficiary data

Trust Fund data

Benefit data, available for certain       types of beneficiaries or      "families," are collected on a       monthly basis. Such data provide the number of beneficiaries and their       average payment amounts. Available data bases are shown below.

(By definition, currently-paid beneficiaries exclude        those whose benefits are withheld for various reasons,        such as having earnings in excess of the       retirement earnings test)

- Currently-paid beneficiaries, grouped by            - beneficiary  type or 
  - family  type, Currently-paid beneficiaries, distributed by         
age
 or 
benefit level

for a selected beneficiary type
Benefits awarded
 (new       beneficiaries and changes in benefit type).

Available graphs:       
- Growth in number of beneficiaries
- Number of retired or disabled workers            by age and sex
- Awards  to retired or disabled workers

Footer menu
#### I. W. LIPE v. COUNTY OF STANLY.

(Filed 19 December, 1930.)

Controversy without Action A h: Appeal and Error E a — Affidavit must be filed in submission of controversy: Record must contain necessary parts.

A case submitted on agreed statement of facts must be accompanied by necessary affidavit, and if an adversary proceeding tbe record proper must contain necessary parts, otherwise the appeal will be dismissed.

Appeal by defendant from *Johnson. Special Judge,*at July Term, 1930, of StaNly.

Proceeding to determine tbe liability of tbe defendant under C. S., 8035, “for costs and attorney’s fees” where unidentified and undiseov-erable lands are sold for taxes.

From a judgment for tbe plaintiff, rendered on an agreed statement of facts, tbe defendant appeals.

*W. L. Mann for plaintiff.*

*W. B. Bogle for defendant.*

Pee Oubiam.

It is not clear from tbe record wbetber tbis is a controversy without action, submitted on an agreed statement of facts, or an adversary proceeding in which tbe facts were agreed upon. If tbe former, it must be dismissed for failure to accompany tbe agreed statement of facts with necessary affidavit. *Grandy v. Gulley,*120 N. C., 176, 26 S. E., 779. If tbe latter, tbe pleadings are not before us and tbe appeal must be dismissed for failure to sendmp' necessary parts of the record proper. *Waters v. Waters,*199 N. C., 667; *Pruitt v. Wood,*199 N. C., 788.

Dismissed.
#### William Jackson, Appellant, v. George D. Eighmie, Respondent.

Judgment of County Court affirmed,with costs. Opinion by

Dykman, J.
EMPLOYEE PERMANENT CHANGE OF ADDRESS 

NOTICE 

Use this form to provide/change your address for accountability purposes only. 

a. Print all information. Abbreviate State; Example: Ohio – OH, Michigan – MI.

EFFECTIVE DATE OF ACTION: ______________________________ 

 YY/MM/DD 

LAST NAME, FIRST NAME, MIDDLE INITIAL: ______________________________________ 

SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER: __________________________________ 

ORGANIZATION/TELEPHONE NUMBER: __________________________________________

__________________________________________ 

HOME ADDRESS: ________________________________________________

________________________________________________
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members         
    -  AEE Multimedia 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# PHOTOS ANDVIDEOS

Search

Search

                                - All Images 
                                - Other 
                                - Space Shuttle 

                                - Upload Date
                                - Photo Date
                                - Title

Clear Search57 results found.

-  FIRST 
-   
-   
- 1 (current)
- 2
- 3
-   
-   
-  LAST
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 244 (Wednesday, December 20, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65648-65649]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30868]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. GT96-19-000]


Columbia Gulf Transmission Company; Notice of Refund Report

December 14, 1995.
    Take notice that on October 25, 1995, Columbia Gulf Transmission 
Company (Columbia Gulf) tendered for filing a Report of Gas Research 
Institute (GRI) Refund. Columbia Gulf states that the refund report is 
being made in accordance with Ordering Paragraph C of the Commission's 
February 22, 1955 ``Order Approving Refund Methodology For 1994 
Overcollections'' in Docket No. RP95-124-000.
    Columbia Gulf states that it has credited the GRI refund to its 
eligible firm customers as a credit to invoices issued on or around 
September 10, 1995. The refund totalling $209,205.00 represented 
overcollections of GRI surcharges for the period January 1, 1994 
through December 31, 1994.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure. All such motions or protests should be filed on 
or before December 21, 1995. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies 

[[Page 65649]]
of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-30868 Filed 12-19-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 236 (Friday, December 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 63059]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-29976]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-31,079]


Picker International, Inc., Cleveland, OH; Amended Certification 
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Notice of Certification 
Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on June 
30, 1995, applicable to all workers of Picker International, Inc., 
engaged in employment related to the production of medical imaging 
equipment in Cleveland, Ohio. The notice was published in the Federal 
Register on July 19, 1995 (60 FR 37083).
    At the request of the State Agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers produce 
medical imaging equipment. New findings show that the support workers 
(sales, service and administrative) of the subject firm, located in 
various States, should have been included. The intent of the 
Department's certification is to include all workers of Picker 
International, Inc. who were adversely affected by increased imports.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-31,079 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of Picker International, Inc., Cleveland, Ohio, 
and at various field offices listed below, engaged in employment 
related to the production of medical imaging equipment who became 
totally or partially separated from employment on or after May 13, 
1994 are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 
223 of the Trade Act of 1974:

TA-W-31,079A  Alabama
TA-W-31,079B  Arizona
TA-W-31,079C  California
TA-W-31,079D  Colorado
TA-W-31,079E  Florida
TA-W-31,079F  Georgia
TA-W-31,079G  Illinois
TA-W-31,079H  Indiana
TA-W-31,079I  Iowa
TA-W-31,079J  Kansas
TA-W-31,079K  Louisiana
TA-W-31,079L  Maryland
TA-W-31,079M  Massachusetts
TA-W-31,079N  Michigan
TA-W-31,079O  Missouri
TA-W-31,079P  Montana
TA-W-31,079Q  New Jersey
TA-W-31,079R  New York
TA-W-31,079S  North Carolina
TA-W-31,079T  Oregon
TA-W-31,079U  South Carolina
TA-W-31,079V  Texas
TA-W-31,079W  Virginia
TA-W-31,079X  Washington
TA-W-31,079Y  West Virginia
TA-W-31,079Z  Wyoming.''

    Signed at Washington, DC this 27th day of November 1995.
Rusell T. Kile,
Acting Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-29976 Filed 12-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 246 (Friday, December 22, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66547-66548]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31126]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 66548]]


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. ER96-339-000]


Southern Company Services, Inc.; Notice of Filing

December 18, 1995.
    Take notice that on December 6, 1995, Southern Company Services, 
Inc., acting on behalf of Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power Company, 
Gulf Power Company, Mississippi Power Company and Savannah Electric and 
Power Company (Collectively referSouthern Companies), tendered for 
filing a supplement to its filing under section 205 of the Federal 
Power Act. The Supplemented Filing involves the Interchange Service 
Contract between Southern Companies and Koch Power Services, Inc. The 
Interchange Service Contract establishes the terms and conditions of 
power supply, including provisions relating to service conditions, 
control of system disturbances, metering and other matters related to 
the administration of the agreement.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions or 
protests should be filed on or before December 29, 1995. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action 
to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-31126 Filed 12-21-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Amendment to the Ingersoll-Rand Company Management Incentive Unit Plan



 Exhibit 10.34 
 AMENDMENT TO THE 
 INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY 
 MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE UNIT PLAN 
 WHEREAS, Ingersoll-Rand Company (the “Company”) maintains the Ingersoll-Rand Company Management Incentive Unit Plan (the “Plan”) to provide benefits to certain individuals employed by the Company and its
subsidiaries; and 
 WHEREAS, no Management Incentive Unit Award has been made under the Plan since 1990, and all previously unvested
awards under the Plan became vested on January 1, 2003; and 
 WHEREAS, under Article XV of the Plan, the Company has reserved
the right to amend or terminate the Plan at any time; 
 WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company
has delegated authority to Administration Committee of the Company’s non-qualified defined contribution plans (the Non-Qualified DC Plans) authority to approve non-material amendments to Non-Qualified DC Plans, including the Plan; 

WHEREAS, the Plan was amended on December 22, 2008 to ensure compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code (the
“409A Amendment”); 
 WHEREAS, the 409A Amendment contained a “scrivener’s error” mistakenly providing that
no further cash payments and Dividend Accruals would be credited to Participant’s accounts after December 31, 2008; and 
 WHERAS the Administration Committee desires to amend the Plan to correct the aforesaid “scrivener’s error”; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective December 31, 2008 to provide that the following language as set forth in the 409A Amendment shall be deleted in its entirety and have no effect: 
 No additional cash payments shall be made to any Participant pursuant to Article VI of the Plan, and no Dividend Equivalents shall be credited to any Participant’s
account in the Incentive Ledger pursuant to the first sentence of Article VIII(a) of the Plan, with respect to any dividend declared on the stock of Ingersoll-Rand Company Limited after December 31, 2008. The foregoing shall not affect any
Participant’s right to have dividends with respect to Common Stock Equivalents that were credited to the Participant’s account on December 31, 2008 credited in the form of additional Common Stock Equivalents after December 31,
2008. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the members of the Administration Committee have caused this amendment to be executed on this
5th day of June, 2009. 
  

			
	ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE OF THE INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE UNIT PLAN
		
	By:	 	/s/ Jeffrey Blair
		 	Jeffrey Blair
		
	By:	 	/s/ Paul Henry
		 	Paul Henry
		
	By:	 	/s/ Ben Lei
		 	Ben Lei
		
	By:	 	/s/ Joanne Maughan
		 	Joanne Maughan
		
	By:	 	/s/ William Murray
		 	William Murray
		
	By:	 	/s/ Constance Roseler
		 	Constance Roseler


  

 - 2 -
#### J. W. SWANGER v. H. M. RICE and RONALD A. RICE, Trading and Doing Business as H. M. RICE & SON.

(Filed 6 March, 1957.)

Negligence § 4f—

Nonsuit *field*proper in this action by. an electrician employed in ithe repair of a burned building, who was injured in doing bis work when a board broke under bis foot as he was walking, in the progress of bis work, near to a ragged burned-out hole in tbe floor, which be bad seen and passed several times before.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Huskins, J.,*November Civil Term 1956 of BuNCOMbe.

Action for damages for personal injuries.

At the close of plaintiff’s evidence, the court entered a judgment of involuntary nonsuit, and plaintiff appeals.

*Don C. Young and Narvel Crawford for Plaintiff, Appellant.*

*Meekins, Packer & Roberts for Defendants, Appellees.*

PeR CüRIAM.

Defendants, who were general contractors for the repair of a burned building, employed plaintiff, who had been engaged in the electrical business 36 years, to do temporary electrical work in the burned building to supply light so the repair work could begin. Plaintiff, in doing his work, was walking a foot or so to the right of a ragged edged burned-out hole in the floor six or eight feet square, that he had seen and passed several times before, when a board broke under his left foot, and he fell into the basement, receiving injuries.

A careful consideration of the evidence in the Record constrains us to hold that the court below correctly entered the judgment of nonsuit, if not upon the ground of plaintiff’s failure to make out a case of actionable negligence against the defendants, then upon the ground of contributory negligence.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 235 (Thursday, December 7, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 62924]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-29855]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UTAH RECLAMATION MITIGATION AND CONSERVATION COMMISSION


Request for Recommendations

AGENCY: Utah Reclamation Mitigation and Conservation Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Request for recommendations for potential projects to mitigate 
the impacts on fish, wildlife and recreation resources from the 
construction and operation of Federal reclamation projects in Utah. 
Selected projects will be incorporated into the Utah Reclamation 
Mitigation and Conservation Commission five-year plan.

DATES: Recommendations will be accepted no later than 5:00 p.m. on 
Tuesday, January 2, 1996.

ADDRESSES: One original and two copies of each recommendation should be 
submitted to: Planning Manager, Utah Reclamation Mitigation and 
Conservation Commission, 111 East Broadway, Suite 310, Salt Lake City, 
Utah 84111-5225.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joan Degiorgio, Telephone (801) 524-3146; Facsimile (801) 524-3148.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Utah Reclamation Mitigation and 
Conservation Commission was established to coordinate the 
implementation of mitigation and conservation provisions of Titles II, 
III and IV of the Central Utah Project Completion Act. Section 301(g) 
of the Act requires the Commission to develop and adopt a plan that 
will identify projects to be implemented over a five year period that 
will mitigate and conserve fish, wildlife, and recreation resources. A 
Planning Rule was adopted by the Commission on August 21, 1995, and 
published in the Federal Register on September 25, 1995. The Planning 
Rule outlines the planning process and identifies decision factors to 
be used by the Commission to evaluate and select proposals. On October 
3, 1995, notice was sent to Federal and State fish, wildlife, 
recreation, and water management agencies, Indian tribes, county and 
municipal entities and interested publics within Utah requesting 
recommendations to implement the mitigation and conservation measures 
authorized in the Act.

    Authority: Pub. L. 102-575, 106 Stat. 4600, 4625, October 30, 
1992.
Michael C. Weland,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 95-29855 Filed 12-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-M
#### William D. Jones, as Assignee, etc., Respondent, v. The Howard Insurance Company of New York, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Landon, J.
#### C. A. PORTER v. JACKSON GOLD MINING COMPANY and L. BARNETTE NEWBY.

(Filed 26 November, 1930.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *Moore, J.,*at March Term, 1930, of Uhiok.

Admissions in answer sufficient to overcome defendant’s motion, of nonsuit in this case.

*Vann & Millihen for plaintiff.*

*IT. B. Adams for defendants.*

Pek CuRiam.

The plaintiff brought suit against the defendants for the sum of $3,900 for services alleged to have been performed under a contract made in the month of October, 1927. The defendants denied liability, Newby alleging that he had paid the plaintiff the entire amount he had agreed to pay and set up a counterclaim against the plaintiff for $640.87. When the plaintiff had introduced his evidence and rested the defendants moved for judgment of nonsuit and the motion was allowed. The plaintiff excepted and appealed.

We affirm the judgment of nonsuit as to the Jackson Gold Mining Company, but in view of the admission in Newby’s answer in reference to his agreement with the plaintiff and the plaintiff’s testimony in respect to it we are of opinion that as to Newby the judgment of non-suit should be set aside.

Judgment affirmed as to Jackson G-old Mining Company and reversed as to Newby.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 239 (Wednesday, December 13, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 64101]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30462]








U.S. RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD

Notice of Public Meeting

    Notice is hereby given that the Railroad Retirement Board will hold 
a meeting on December 20, 1995, 9:00 a.m., at the Board's meeting room 
on the 8th floor of its headquarters building, 844 North Rush Street, 
Chicago, Illinois, 60611. The agenda for this meeting follows:

Portion Open to the Public

    (1) Employer Status Determination--Hohorst Transportation 
Corp.--Request for Waiver of Retroactive RUIA Contributions.
    (2) Regulations--Proposing Revisions to Parts 211 and 261 
(Finality of Decisions Regarding Railroad Retirement Annuities) and 
Part 255 (Recovery of Overpayments).

Portion Closed to the Public

    (A) Recommended Reassignments of Agency Personnel.
    (B) Appeal of Mr. & Mrs. Lawrence Zea.
    (C) Appeal of David W. Persinger.
    (D) Appeal of Kathleen T. O'Toole.

    The person to contact for more information is Beatrice Ezerski, 
Secretary to the Board, Phone No. 312-751-4920.

    Dated: December 8, 1995.
Beatrice Ezerski,

Secretary to the Board.

[FR Doc. 95-30462 Filed 12-11-95; 2:06 pm]

BILLING CODE 7905-01-M