alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

HELEN KEARNS, *

* No. 18-654V

Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran

*

v. * Filed: October 6, 2021

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Stipulation; pneumococcal conjugate 

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * (Prevnar13) vaccine; connective 

* tissue disease.

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Ronald C. Homer, Conway, Homer, P.C., Boston, MA, for Petitioner;

Adriana Teitel, United States Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. 

UNPUBLISHED DECISION1

On October 5, 2021, the parties filed a joint stipulation concerning the 

petition for compensation filed by Helen Kearns on May 8, 2018. Petitioner 

alleged that the pneumococcal conjugate (Prevnar13) vaccine she received on May

28, 2015, which is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. 

§100.3(a), caused her to suffer from connective tissue disease. Petitioner further 

alleges that she suffered the residual effects of this injury for more than six months. 

Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil 

action for damages on her behalf as a result of her condition.

Respondent denies that the Prevnar13 vaccine caused petitioner to suffer 

from connective tissue disease or any other injury. 

1 The E-Government Act, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and 

Promotion of Electronic Government Services), requires that the Court post this decision on its 

website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing 

redaction of medical information or other information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). 

Any redactions ordered by the special master will appear in the document posted on the website.
2

Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto. The 

undersigned finds said stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the 

Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Damages awarded in that stipulation include:

A lump sum payment of $92,500.00 in the form of a check payable to 

petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that 

would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B,

the clerk is directed to enter judgment according to this decision and the attached 

stipulation.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Christian J. Moran

Christian J. Moran

Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each 

party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal 

Claims judge.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 244 (Wednesday, December 20, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 65637]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30949]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), Article 1904 
Binational Panel Reviews: Notice of Completion of Panel Review

AGENCY: North American Free Trade Agreement, NAFTA Secretariat, United 
States Section, International Trade Administration, Department of 
Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of Completion of Panel Review of the final dumping 
determination made by the Secretaria de Comercio y Fomento Industrial, 
respecting Seamless Commercial Steel Tubes from the United States of 
America. The Binantional Panel Review is terminated. (Secretariat File 
No. MEX-95-1904-01).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On November 10, 1995, Gulf States Tube Division field a 
Request for Panel review in the above referenced matter with the 
Mexican Section of the NAFTA Secretariat. On December 6, 1995, Gulf 
States filed a Notice of Motion requesting termination of this panel 
review. No other interested persons filed a request for Panel Review of 
this final determination. As of December 6, 1995, no Complaint nor 
Notice of Appearance had been filed by any interested person. 
Therefore, pursuant to subrules 71(2) and 78(a) of the NAFTA Article 
1904 Panel Rules 159 FR 8686, February 23, 1994) this Notice of 
Completion of Panel Review was effective on March 17, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James R. Holbein, United States Secretary, Binational Secretariat, 
Suite 2061, 14th and Constitution Avenue, Washington, D.C. 20230, (202) 
482-5438.

    Dated: December 13, 1995
James R. Holbein,
United States Secretary, NAFTA Binational Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 95-30949 Filed 12-29-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-GT-M
#### STATE v. CHARLIE WATERS.

(Filed 20 November, 1935.)

1. Criminal Xiaw I f — Trial court may consolidate for trial separate offenses of the same class.

Defendant was tried separately in municipal court on two warrants, each charging assault with a deadly weapon, but upon different persons on separate occasions about fifteen days apart. On appeal to the Superior Court, the court, upon motion of the solicitor, consolidated the cases for trial. *Held,:*Under the provisions of O. S., 4622, the order of consolidation was within the discretionary power of the trial court. .

3. Criminal Law I j—

Motions to nonsuit on conflicting evidence are properly denied.

Devin, J., tools: no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Appeal by the defendant from *Parker, J.,*at June Term, 1935, of LeNOIR.

Affirmed.

*Attorney-General Seawell and Assistant Attorney-General Aiken for the State.*

*Shaw & J ones for defendant, appellant.*

ScheNok, J.

There are two eases against the defendant that came to the Superior Court by appeal from the municipal county court of Kin-ston and Lenoir County. The warrant in one case charges the defendant with an assault with a deadly weapon, to wit: A club, upon one Bogers, on 3 March, 1935, and the warrant in the other case charges the defendant with an assault with a deadly weapon, to wit: A knife, upon one Lokey on 18 March, 1935.

When called for trial, upon motion of the solicitor, the two cases were ordered consolidated, and to this order of consolidation the defendant in apt time objected, and makes his exception based upon this objection his principal assignment of error.

*770C. S., 4622, reads as follows: “When there are several charges against any person for the same act or transaction, or for two or more acts ox-transactions coxxnected together, *or for two or more transactions of the same class of crimes or offenses,*which may be properly joined, instead of several indictments, the whole may be joined in one indictment in separate counts; and if two or more indictments are found in such eases, the court will order them to be consolidated. . . .”

Since the two transactions delineated in the two warrants are of the “same class of crimes,” the consolidation of the two cases for the purpose of trial rested in the sound discretion of the trial judge.

The other assignments of error brought forward in the brief relate to the refusal of the court to allow defendant’s demurrer to the evidence. While the evidence is conflicting, it was sufficient to carry both cases to the jury, and since the jury returned a verdict of guilty on both charges, these assignments can avail the plaintiff nothing.

No error.

DeviN, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 242 (Monday, December 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65067-65068]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30632]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act

    In accordance with Departmental policy, 28 C.F.R. Sec. 50.7, notice 
is hereby given that on September 29, 1995, a proposed Consent Decree 
in United States of America v. The Port of Seattle, et al., Civil 
Action No. C95-1495-Z, was lodged with the United States District Court 
for the Western District of Washington.
    The Complaint in this action was brought pursuant to Section 107 of 
the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability 
Act, 42 U.S.C. 9607, to require the defendants to implement EPA's 
selected cleanup for the Site, and to recover costs incurred by the 
United States in response to releases of hazardous 

[[Page 65068]]
substances at the Harbor Island Superfund Site in Seattle, Washington.
    The proposed Consent Decree that is the subject of this Notice 
requires the defendants to complete the cleanup selected by EPA for the 
Soil and Groundwater Operable Units of the Site. The United States 
estimates that the cleanup expense will be approximately $40 million. 
The Consent Decree also requires the defendants to reimburse the United 
States for all costs it shall incur in overseeing the completion of the 
cleanup.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General of the Environmental and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, P.O. Box 7611, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, 
D.C. 20044. Comments should refer to United States of America v. the 
Port of Seattle, et al., Civil Action No. C95-1495-Z, DOJ Ref. No. 90-
11-2-970A.
    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Office of 
Regional Counsel, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Sixth Avenue, 
Seattle, Washington (206) 553-1504; and at the Consent Decree Library, 
1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20005, (202) 624-0892. A 
copy of the proposed Consent Decree may be obtained in person or by 
mail from the Consent Decree Library. In requesting a copy please refer 
to the referenced case and enclose a check in the amount of $18.00 (25 
cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the Consent Decree 
Library.
Joel Gross,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 95-30632 Filed 12-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# PHOTOS ANDVIDEOS

Search

Search

                                - All Images 
                                - Other 
                                - Space Shuttle 

                                - Upload Date
                                - Photo Date
                                - Title

----

Download Image: Full Size (1.26 MB)

Tags:MARFORCYBER, COC, USMCNews, USSPACECOM, MARFORSPACE, MCIC, DMAM

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   Exhibit 10.31

                               AMENDMENT NUMBER 6
                           TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT OF
                                 JERRY D. HORN

         Amendment Number 6, dated as of November 4, 1996 to the Employment
Agreement, dated as of March 24, 1989 and previously amended as of July 24,
1989, and previously amended as of July 24, 1989, August 18, 1989, December 1,
1990, August 16, 1991 and October 13, 1993 (the "Employment Agreement"),
between General Nutrition, Incorporated (the "Company") and Jerry D. Horn
("Executive").  Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the
meanings assigned to them in the Employment Agreement.

         WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the
Company by unanimous consent, approved an amendment of Executive's Employment
Agreement.

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of Executive's continued performance
of his duties as an officer of the Company, the Company and Executive hereby
agree that:

         1. The Employment Period is hereby extended until February 3, 2001.
All references to January February 3, 1993 as amended to February 1, 1995, as
further amended January 31, 1998 in the Employment Agreement, are hereby
changed to references to February 3, 2001.

         2. Section 3(a) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to
provide that Executive's base salary shall be as set forth below for the fiscal
years indicated. The salary amounts are fixed and do not adjust for cost of
living increases.

         Fiscal Year Ending January 31, 1998       --       $300,000
         Fiscal Year Ending February 6, 1999       --       $250,000
         Fiscal Year Ending February 5, 2000       --       $200,000
         Fiscal Year Ending February 3, 2001       --       $150,000

         3. Section 11 of the Agreement entitled "Consulting Services," is
hereby deleted in its entirety.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as
of the date first written above.

                                          GENERAL NUTRITION, INCORPORATED

                                          By:
                                             ------------------------------

                                          Its:
                                              -----------------------------

                                          ---------------------------------
                                          EXECUTIVE
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	Tenets of Responsible Behavior in Space
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4619" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/DOD2/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint news">
    <div class="header">
        <img height="100" class="print-logo" alt="Site Logo" src="/Portals/57/spacecom-logo.png?ver=DL6eDR7B9pBwEnWyDk78jA%3d%3d" />

        <h1 class="title">Tenets of Responsible Behavior in Space</h1>
    </div>
    

    <div> <span class="date">/ Published July 7, 2021</span></div>
    <span class="dateline-text"></span>
    <div style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://media.defense.gov/2023/Mar/03/2003171980/-1/-1/1/TENETS%20OF%20RESPONSIBLE%20BEHAVIOR%20IN%20SPACE%20OSD071107-21%20RES%20FINAL.PDF"><img alt="" src="/Portals/57/210711-F-XO712-1001.jpg" style="width: 100%;" title="" /></a></div>
<br />
</div>

    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

FRANKLIN MONFISTON

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 468

[ October 15, 2020 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Bernard I

. Bober , Judge; L.T. Case No. 02

- 10982 CF10B

.

Franklin Monfiston, Arcadia, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Paul Patti, III,

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS

, C IKL IN and C ONNER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
## Actuarial Organizations

Office of the Chief Actuary
Actuaries at SSA

Society of Actuaries

American Academy of Actuaries

Casualty Actuarial Society

 International Social Security Association

 Canadian Institute of Actuaries

 Institute of Actuaries of Australia
 Institute of Actuaries/The Faculty of Actuaries

 Actuarial Society of South Africa

Footer menu
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5505 

To improve the establishment of any lower ground-level ozone standards, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2014 

Mr. OLSON (for himself, Mr. LATTA, Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. 

CASSIDY, Mr. FLORES, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. HALL, Mr. MCCLINTOCK, Mr. HULTGREN, Mr. TIPTON, Mr. MCKINLEY, Mr. SMITH of Missouri, Mr. JONES, Mrs. NOEM, Mrs. LUMMIS, Mr. POMPEO, Mr. HARPER, 

Mr. BRADY of Texas, Mr. LONG, Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio, and Mr. 

CUELLAR) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To improve the establishment of any lower ground-level ozone 

standards, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Clean Air, Strong 

5 Economies Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. GROUND-LEVEL OZONE STANDARDS. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of law (includ8 ing regulations), in promulgating a national primary or 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5505 IH

1 secondary ambient air quality standard for ozone, the Ad2 ministrator of the Environmental Protection Agency— 

3 (1) shall not propose a national primary or sec4 ondary ambient air quality standard for ozone that 

5 is lower than the standard established under section 

6 50.15 of title 40, Code of Federal Regulations (as 

7 in effect on January 1, 2014), until at least 85 per8 cent of the counties that were nonattainment areas 

9 under that standard as of January 1, 2014, achieve 

10 full compliance with that standard; 

11 (2) shall only consider all or part of a county 

12 to be a nonattainment area under the standard on 

13 the basis of direct air quality monitoring; 

14 (3) shall take into consideration feasibility and 

15 cost; and 

16 (4) shall include in the regulatory impact anal17 ysis for the proposed and final rule at least 1 anal18 ysis that does not include any calculation of benefits 

19 resulting from reducing emissions of any pollutant 

20 other than ozone. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 241 (Friday, December 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64455-64456]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30571]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Advisory Committee for Computer and Information Science and 
Engineering; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-

[[Page 64456]]
    463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Advisory Committee for Computer and Information Science 
and Engineering
    Date and Time: January 4-5, 1996; 8:30 am to 5:00 pm
    Place: Room 1120, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230
    Type of Meeting: Closed
    Contact Person: Mr. David A. Staudt, National Science 
Foundation, Room 1175, Arlington, VA 22230 (703 306-1949).
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning program proposal processing and handling.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate program procedures for the 
Committee of Visitors, NSFNET Program and Collaborative Activities.
    Reason for closing: The information being reviewed includes 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; and financial data. These matters are exempt 
under 5 U.S.C. 552b.(c) (4) and (6) of the Government in the 
Sunshine Act.

    Dated: December 12, 1995.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-30571 Filed 12-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
## Single-Year Tables Consistent With 2021 OASDI Trustees Report

2021 OASDI Trustees Report

            The tables listed below provide estimates by            alternative economic and/or demographic assumptions.            For some of the tables, we also provide historical data.            The tables carry the same designation as in the published report.            Reference should be made to the report            to understand the context in which the estimates are presented.          

            To allow easier access for people who may want to work with the data, we            also supply the tables in Excel.