5710 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 3, 2016 / Notices 

7See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). 

8See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1)–(2). 

9See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

10See 19 CFR 351.310(d). 

1See Notice of Amended Final Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping 

Duty Order; Honey from the People’s Republic of 

China, 66 FR 63670 (December 10, 2001) (‘‘Order’’). 

2See Letter from Shanghai Sunbeauty, ‘‘Honey 

from the People’s Republic of China: Request for 

New Shipper Review,’’ dated December 17, 2015 

(‘‘NSR Request’’). 

3 Id., at 1–2 and Exhibit 1. 

4 Id. 

results of review.7 Rebuttal briefs and 

rebuttals to written comments, limited 

to issues raised in such briefs or 

comments, may be filed no later than 

five days after the time limit for filing 

the case briefs.8

Any interested party may request a 

hearing within 30 days of publication of 

these preliminary results.9 Hearing 

requests should contain the following 

information: (1) The party’s name, 

address, and telephone number; (2) the 

number of participants; and (3) a list of 

the issues to be discussed. Oral 

presentations will be limited to issues 

raised in the briefs. If a request for a 

hearing is made, parties will be notified 

of the time and date for the hearing to 

be held at the U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW., Washington, DC 20230.10

The Department intends to issue the 

final results of these new shipper 

reviews, which will include the results 

of its analysis of issues raised in all 

comments and at any hearing, within 90 

days of publication of these preliminary 

results, pursuant to section 

751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act. 

Assessment Rates 

Upon completion of the final results, 

pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b), the 

Department will determine, and U.S. 

Customs Border and Protection (‘‘CBP’’) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries on a per-unit basis 

for HHFISH. The Department intends to 

issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 

days after the date of publication of the 

final results of review. Pursuant to 19 

CFR 351.212(b)(1), we will calculate 

importer-specific (or customer) per-unit 

duty assessment rates. We will instruct 

CBP to assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review if any importer-specific 

assessment rate calculated in the final 

results of this review is above de 

minimis. The final results of these 

reviews shall be the basis for the 

assessment of antidumping duties on 

entries of merchandise covered by the 

final results of these reviews and for 

future deposits of estimated duties, 

where applicable. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

new shipper review for all shipments of 

subject merchandise from HHFISH 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date, as provided for by 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For 

subject merchandise produced and 

exported by HHFISH, the cash deposit 

rate will be the rate established in the 

final results of this review (except, if a 

rate is zero or de minimis, no cash 

deposit will be required); (2) for subject 

merchandise exported by HHFISH but 

not manufactured by HHFISH, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

Vietnam-wide rate (i.e., $2.39 per 

kilogram); and (3) for subject 

merchandise manufactured by the 

HHFISH, but exported by any other 

party, the cash deposit rate will be the 

rate applicable to the exporter. These 

cash deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice serves as a preliminary 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this POR. 

Failure to comply with this requirement 

could result in the Secretary’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: January 21, 2016. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

List of Topics Discussed in the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

1. Summary 

2. Background 

3. Scope of the Order 

4. Discussion of the Methodology 

5. Bona Fides Analysis 

6. Non-Market Economy Country 

7. Separate Rates 

8. Surrogate Country 

9. Economic Comparability 

10. Significant Producers of Identical or 

Comparable Merchandise 

11. Data Availability 

12. Determination of a Comparison Method 

13. Fair Value Comparisons 

14. U.S. Price 

15. Normal Value 

16. Factor Valuations 

17. Currency Conversion 

18. Conclusion and Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2016–02005 Filed 2–2–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–863] 

Honey From the People’s Republic of 

China: Initiation of Antidumping Duty 

New Shipper Review; 2014–2015 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(‘‘the Department’’) is initiating a new 

shipper review (‘‘NSR’’) of the 

antidumping duty (‘‘AD’’) order on 

honey from the People’s Republic of 

China (‘‘PRC’’) with respect to Shanghai 

Sunbeauty Trading Co., Ltd. (‘‘Shanghai 

Sunbeauty’’). The period of review 

(‘‘POR’’) for this NSR is December 01, 

2014, through November 30, 2015. 

DATES: Effective Date: February 3, 2016. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jessica Weeks, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 202– 

482–4877. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The AD order on honey was 

published in the Federal Register on 

December 10, 2001.1 On December 17, 

2015, pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(i) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(‘‘the Act’’), and 19 CFR 351.214(b), the 

Department received a NSR request 

from Shanghai Sunbeauty.2 Shanghai 

Sunbeauty certified that it is the 

exporter of the subject merchandise 

upon which the request is based and 

that its affiliate, Xiping Haina Trade Co., 

Ltd., is the producer of the subject 

merchandise.3

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(ii), 

Shanghai Sunbeauty certified that it did 

not export subject merchandise to the 

United States during the period of 

investigation (‘‘POI’’).4 Further, Xiping 

Haina Trade Co., Ltd. certified that it is 

the producer of the subject merchandise 

upon which the request is based. In 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 3, 2016 / Notices 5711 

5 Id. 

6 Id. 

7 Id., at 4 and Exhibit 2. 

8See Memorandum to the File from Catherine 

Bertrand, Program Manager, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office V regarding ‘‘U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection Query Results for Shanghai Sunbeauty 

Co., Ltd.’’ dated concurrently with this notice. 

9See Memorandum to the File, from Jessica 

Weeks, International Trade Compliance Analyst, 

‘‘Honey from the People’s Republic of China: New 

Shipper Initiation Checklist,’’ dated concurrently 

with this notice. 

10See 19 CFR 351.214(g)(1)(ii)(B). 

11See section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.214(i). 

1See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, 

Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, From the 

People’s Republic of China: Amended Final 

Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 

and Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 73018 

(December 7, 2012). 

2See Letter from Anji DaSol to the Secretary of 

Commerce ‘‘Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, 

Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, From the 

People’s Republic of China: Request for New 

Shipper Review,’’ dated December 30, 2015 (‘‘NSR 

Request’’). 

addition, pursuant to section 

751(a)(2)(B)(i)(II) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.214(b)(2)(iii)(A), Shanghai 

Sunbeauty certified that, since the 

initiation of the investigation, it has 

never been affiliated with any PRC 

exporter or producer who exported 

subject merchandise to the United 

States during the POI, including those 

respondents not individually examined 

during the investigation.5 As required 

by 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iii)(B), 

Shanghai Sunbeauty also certified that 

its export activities were not controlled 

by the government of the PRC.6

In addition to the certifications 

described above, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.214(b)(2)(iv), Shanghai Sunbeauty 

submitted documentation establishing 

the following: (1) The date on which it 

first shipped subject merchandise for 

export to the United States; (2) the 

volume of its first shipment and 

subsequent shipments; and (3) the date 

of its first sale to an unaffiliated 

customer in the United States.7

Finally, the Department conducted a 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(‘‘CBP’’) database query and confirmed 

the price and quantity reported by 

Shanghai Sunbeauty.8

Initiation of New Shipper Review 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B) of the 

Act, 19 CFR 351.214(b), and 19 CFR 

351.214(d)(1), and based on the 

evidence provided by Shanghai 

Sunbeauty, we find that its request 

meets the threshold requirements for 

initiation of the NSR for shipments of 

honey from the PRC produced by Xiping 

Haina Trade Co., Ltd. and exported by 

Shanghai Sunbeauty.9 The POR is 

December 01, 2014, through November 

30, 2015.10 If the information supplied 

by Shanghai Sunbeauty is found to be 

incorrect or insufficient during the 

course of this proceeding, the 

Department may rescind the review for 

Shanghai Sunbeauty or apply facts 

available pursuant to section 776 of the 

Act, depending on the facts on the 

record. 

Absent a determination that the new 

shipper review is extraordinarily 

complicated, the Department intends to 

issue the preliminary results of this NSR 

within 180 days from the date of 

initiation and the final results within 90 

days after the date on which the 

preliminary results are issued.11

It is the Department’s usual practice, 

in cases involving non-market 

economies (‘‘NMEs’’), to require that a 

company seeking to establish eligibility 

for an antidumping duty rate separate 

from the NME entity-wide rate provide 

evidence of de jure and de facto absence 

of government control over the 

company’s export activities. 

Accordingly, we will issue 

questionnaires to Shanghai Sunbeauty 

that will include a section requesting 

information concerning its eligibility for 

a separate rate. The NSR will proceed if 

the responses provide sufficient 

indication that Shanghai Sunbeauty is 

not subject to either de jure or de facto 

government control with respect to its 

exports of subject merchandise. 

We will instruct CBP to allow, at the 

option of the importer, the posting, until 

the completion of this review, of a bond 

or security in lieu of a cash deposit for 

each entry of the subject merchandise 

from the requesting companies in 

accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B)(iii) 

of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(e). 

Because Shanghai Sunbeauty certified 

that its affiliate Xiping Haina Trade Co., 

Ltd. produced the subject merchandise 

which Shanghai Sunbeauty exported, 

the sales of which are the basis for the 

NSR request, we will instruct CBP to 

permit the use of a bond only for subject 

merchandise which Xiping Haina Trade 

Co., Ltd produced and Shanghai 

Sunbeauty exported. 

Interested parties requiring access to 

proprietary information in this NSR 

should submit applications for 

disclosure under administrative 

protective order, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.305 and 19 CFR 351.306. 

This initiation and notice are in 

accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B) of 

the Act, 19 CFR 351.214, and 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(1)(i). 

Dated: January 27, 2016. 

Gary Taverman, 

Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2016–02004 Filed 2–2–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–979] 

Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, 

Whether or Not Assembled Into 

Modules, From the People’s Republic 

of China: Initiation of Antidumping 

Duty New Shipper Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The request described below 

for a new shipper review of the 

antidumping duty (AD) order on 

crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, 

whether or not assembled into modules, 

(‘‘solar cells’’) from the People’s 

Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) meets the 

statutory and regulatory requirements 

for initiation. The period of review 

(‘‘POR’’) for the new shipper review is 

December 1, 2014 through November 

30, 2015. 

DATES: Effective Date: February 3, 2016. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erin 

Kearney, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–0167. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 7, 2012, the Department 

of Commerce (‘‘Department’’) published 

the AD order on solar cells from the 

PRC.1 On December 30, 2015, pursuant 

to section 751(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the ‘‘Act’’), 

and 19 CFR 351.214(c), the Department 

received a timely request for a new 

shipper review from Anji DaSol Solar 

Energy Science & Technology Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Anji DaSol’’).2 On January 19, 2016, 

the Department received entry data from 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(‘‘CBP’’) related to Anji DaSol’s request 

for a new shipper review, and on 

January 21, 2016, we requested 

comments on the entry data from 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES