Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 8, 1995 / Notices 7543

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has

received amendments to pesticide (PP)

and/or food/feed additive (FAP)

petitions as follows proposing the

establishment and/or amendment of

tolerances or regulations for residues of

certain pesticide chemicals in or on

certain agricultural commodities. EPA

has also received a request to withdraw

without prejudice to future filing a

pesticide peitition. The petitions are as

follows:

Amended Petitions

1. PP 3F4231. Miles, Inc., Agricultural

Division, P.O. Box 4913, Kansas City,

MO 64120-0013, has submitted a

revised petition, notice of which

originally appeared in the Federal

Register of October 21, 1993 (58 FR

54354). The revised petition proposes

that 40 CFR part 180 be amended to

establish tolerances for combined

residues of imidacloprid, 1-[(6-chloro-3-

pyridinyl)methyl]-N-nitro-2-

imidazolidinimine, and its metabolites

containing the 6-chloropyridinyl

moiety, all expressed as imidacloprid,

on the following commodities: Fruiting

vegetables (including tomato, eggplant,

and pepper) at 1.0 part per million

(ppm); Brassica (cole) leafy vegetables

(including broccoli, cauliflower,

Brussels sprouts, and cabbage at 3.5

ppm; lettuce, head and leaf at 3.5 ppm;

and grapefruit at 1.0 ppm. (PM 19)

2. PP 4F4318. Myotech Corp., 630

Utah Ave., P.O. Box 4109, Butte, MT

59702, has submitted a revised petition,

notice of which originally appeared in

the Federal Register of July 13, 1994 (59

FR 35718). The revised petition

proposes that 40 CFR part 180 be

amended by establishing a regulation to

exempt from the requirement of a

tolerance residues of the insecticide

Beauvaria bassiana strain GHA in or on

all raw agricultural commodities. (Phil

Hutton)

3. FAP 3H5675. Miles, Inc.,

Agricultural Div., P.O. Box 4913, Kansas

City, MO 64120-0013, has submitted a

revised food/feed additive petition,

notice of which originally appeared in

the Federal Register of October 21, 1993

(58 FR 54356). The revised petition

proposes that 40 CFR parts 185 (food

additives) and 186 (feed additives) be

amended to establish tolerances for

combined residues of imidacloprid, 1-

[(6-chloro-3-pyridinyl)methyl]-N-nitro2-imidazolidinimine, and its

metabolites containing the 6-

chloropyridinyl moiety, all expressed as

imidacloprid, in or on the following

food additive commodities: Tomato,

puree at 3.0 ppm, tomato, paste at 6.0

ppm, and grape, raisin and juice at 1.5

ppm; and in or on the following feed

additive commodities: Tomato, pomace

(wet or dried) at 4.0 ppm; grape, pomace

(wet or dried) at 5.0 ppm; and grape,

raisin waste at 15.0 ppm. (PM 19)

Withdrawn Petition

4. PP 1E2573. Sandoz Agro, Inc., 1300

E. Touhy Ave., Des Plaines, IL 60018-

3300, has requested to withdraw

without prejudice to future filing its

petition to establish tolerances for

residues of quinalphos (O,O-diethyl O2-quinoxalinyl phosphorothioate) at 0.2

ppm in or on apples, 0.2 ppm in or on

citrus, and 0.1 ppm in or on tomatoes.

Sandoz made the request in a letter

dated January 5, 1995. (PM 19)

List of Subjects

Environmental protection,

Agricultural commodities, Food

additives, Feed additives, Pesticides and

pests.

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136a.

Dated: February 2, 1995.

Janet L. Andersen,

Acting Director, Biopesticides and Pollution

Prevention Division, Office of Pesticide

Programs.

[FR Doc. 95–3115 Filed 2–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–F

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

[Report No. 2055]

Petition for Reconsideration of Actions

in Rulemaking Proceedings

February 3, 1995.

Petition for reconsideration have been

filed in the Commission rulemaking

proceedings listed in this Public Notice

and published pursuant to 47 CFR

1.429(e). The full text of these

documents are available for viewing and

copying in Room 239, 1919 M Street,

NW, Washington, DC or may be

purchased from the Commission’s copy

contractor ITS, Inc. (202) 857-3800.

Opposition to these petitions must be

filed February 23, 1995. See § 1.4(b)(1)

of the Commission’s rules (47 CFR

1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition must

be filed within 10 days after the time for

filing oppositions has expired.

Subject: Amendment of part 73, subpart

G, of the Commission’s Rules

Regarding the Emergency Broadcast

System. (FO Docket No. 91–301 and

FO Docket No. 91–171)

Number of Petitions Filed: 5.

Federal Communications Commission.

William F. Caton,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–3091 Filed 2–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712–01–M

[WT Docket No. 95–11; DA 95–83]

Designation of Amateur License

Renewal Application for Hearing

AGENCY: Federal Communications

Commission.

ACTION: Hearing designation order.

SUMMARY: This Order designates the

application of Herbert L. Schoenbohm

to renew his amateur radio station

license (KV4FZ) and his Amateur Extra

Class operator license for hearing on the

basis of a criminal conviction.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Thomas D. Fitz-Gibbon, Enforcement

Division, Wireless Telecommunications

Bureau, Federal Communications

Commission, Washington, DC 20554; or

telephone (202) 418–0693.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

1. This is a summary of the Order

adopted January 18, 1995, and released

January 30, 1995. The complete text of

this Order may be purchased from the

Commission’s copy contractor,

International Transcription Service,

(202) 857–3800, 2100 M Street, NW.,

Suite 140, Washington, DC 20037.

2. The Order asserted that Mr. Herbert

L. Schoenbohm has applied for renewal

of his amateur service station and

operator licenses.

3. The Order asserted further that, in

Government v. Schoenbohm, No. Crim:

1991/0108 (D.V.I. Dec. 30, 1992), Mr.

Schoenbohm was convicted in the U.S.

District Court for the District of the

Virgin Islands (District Court) of

violating 18 U.S.C. 1029(a)(1)

(fraudulent use of counterfeit access

device); and that, on appeal, the U.S.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

affirmed Mr. Schoenbohm’s conviction.

United States v. Schoenbohm, No. 93–

7516 (Third Circuit July 22, 1994).

4. The Order alleged that, in view of

the criminal conviction described

above, Mr. Schoenbohm apparently

lacks the requisite qualifications for a

renewal of his amateur service licensee.

5. The Order designated Mr.

Schoenbohm’s application for hearing

upon the following issues:

(a) To determine whether, in light of

the conviction described above, Herbert

L. Schoenbohm is qualified to renew his

amateur service licenses.

(b) To determine, in light of the

foregoing issue, whether granting

Herbert L. Schoenbohm’s application