Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 240 / Thursday, December 14, 1995 / Notices 64179

1 DRGW is within SPT’s consolidated group of

companies.

2 DRGW is retaining an easement for rail

operations by which DRGW will continue to

provide freight rail service over the properties being

transferred and easement granted to SPT. Under the

purchase and sale agreements entered into by SPT

and DRGW, SPT may not commence rail operations

over these rail lines without obtaining additional

authorization from the Commission.

(DRGW),1 common carriers by railroad,

have jointly filed a notice of exemption

to exempt a transaction whereby SPT

will purchase DRGW’s right-of-way,

together with adjoining lands and

improvements, between (1) DRGW

milepost 128.8 at or near Orestod, CO,

and DRGW milepost 166.8 at or near

Dotsero, CO; (2) DRGW milepost 175.95

at or near Walsenburg, CO, and DRGW

milepost 269.72 at or near Monte Vista,

CO; (3) DRGW milepost 373.22 at or

near Delta, CO, and DRGW milepost

417.83 at or near Oliver, CO; (4) DRGW

milepost 603.52 at or near Mounds, UT,

and DRGW milepost 17.7 at or near

Sunnyside, UT; (5) DRGW milepost 0.00

and DRGW milepost 3.44 near

Wellington, UT; (6) DRGW milepost

644.29 at or near Colton, UT, and DRGW

milepost 21.57 at or near Clear Creek,

UT; (7) DRGW milepost 695.70 at or

near Springville Crossover, UT, and

DRGW milepost 33.18 at or near Burgin,

UT; (8) DRGW milepost 360.91 at or

near Glenwood Springs, CO, and DRGW

milepost 393.66 at or near Woody Creek,

CO; (9) DRGW milepost 373.20 at or

near Delta, CO, and DRGW milepost

350.13 at or near Montrose, CO; and (10)

DRGW milepost 269.72 at or near Monte

Vista, CO, and DRGW milepost 321.0 at

or near Creede, CO. DRGW will also

grant SPT an easement over the DRGW

right-of-way between DRGW milepost

373.45 at or near Delta, CO, and DRGW

milepost 424.05 at or near Grand

Junction, CO.2

The parties state that they intended to

consummate these transactions on or

after November 13, 1995.

This is a transaction within a

corporate family of the type specifically

exempted from prior review and

approval under 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(3).

The parties state that the transaction

will not result in adverse changes in

service levels, significant operational

changes, or a change in the competitive

balance with carriers outside the

corporate family. The stated purpose of

the transaction is for corporate finance

reasons and is intended to result in the

prospective reduction of SPT’s

consolidated income and combined

property tax liabilities, thereby

improving SPT’s financial condition.

As a condition to use of this

exemption, any employees adversely

affected by this transaction will be

protected by conditions set forth in New

York Dock Ry.—Control—Brooklyn

Eastern Dist., 360 I.C.C. 60 (1979).

Petitions to revoke the exemption

under 49 U.S.C. 10505(d) may be filed

at any time. The filing of a petition to

revoke will not stay the transaction.

Pleadings must be filed with the

Commission and served on: Louis P.

Warchot, Southern Pacific Building,

Room 815, One Market Plaza, San

Francisco, CA 94105.

Decided: December 8, 1995.

By the Commission, David M. Konschnik,

Director, Office of Proceedings.

Vernon A. Williams,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–30461 Filed 12–13–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7035–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training

Administration

Proposed Information Collection

Request Submitted for Public

Comment and Recommendations;

Services to Migrant and Seasonal

Farmworkers Report and Employment

Service Complaint/Referral Record

AGENCY: Employment and Training

Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, as

part of its continuing effort to reduce

paperwork and respondent burden

conducts a preclearance consultation

program to provide the general public

and Federal agencies with an

opportunity to comment on proposed

and/or continuing collections of

information in accordance with the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

(PRA95) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This

program helps to ensure that requested

data can be provided in the desired

format, reporting burden (time and

financial resources) is minimized,

collection instruments are clearly

understood, and the impact of collection

requirements on respondents can be

properly assessed. Currently, the

Employment and Training

Administration is soliciting comments

concerning the proposed extension of

information collection for Services to

Migrant and Seasonal Farmworkers

Report, Form ETA 5148, and

Employment Service Complaint Referral

Record, ETA 8429.

A copy of the proposed information

collection request can be obtained by

contacting the employee listed below in

the contact section of this notice.

DATES: Written comments must be

submitted on or before February 12,

1996. Written comments should

evaluate whether the proposed

information collection is necessary for

the proper performance of the functions

of the agency, including whether the

information will have practical utility;

evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s

estimate of the burden of the proposed

collection of information including the

validity of the methodology and

assumptions used; enhance the quality,

utility, and clarity of the information to

be collected; and minimize the burden

of the collection of information on those

who are to respond, including through

the use of appropriate automated,

electronic, mechanical, or other

technological collection techniques or

other forms of information.

ADDRESSEE: David Webb, U.S.

Employment Service, Employment and

Training Administration, Department of

Labor, Room N–4470, 200 Constitution

Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20210,

202–219–5174 (This is not a toll-free

number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

As part of the settlement in the case

of NAACP v. Secretary of Labor (Civil

Action No. 2010–72, U.S.D.C.), the U.S.

Department of Labor (DOL) negotiated

with the plaintiffs a series of regulations

published June 10, 1980. Employment

and Training Administration (ETA)

regulations at 20 CFR 651, 653, and 658

under the Wagner-Peyser Act as

amended by the Job Training

Partnership Act, set forth the role and

responsibilities of the United States

Employment Services (USES) and the

State Employment Services Agencies

(SESA) regarding compliance of said

regulations.

In compliance with 20 CFR 653.109,

DOL established recordkeeping

requirements to allow for the efficient

and effective monitoring of SESAs

regulatory compliance.

The ETA Form 8429, Employment

Service Complaint Referral Record, is

used to collect and document all

individual complaints filed under the

ES complaint system.

The ETA Form 5148 Services to

Migrant and Seasonal Farmworkers

Report, is used to collect data which are

primarily used to monitor and to

measure the extent and effectiveness of

ES services to MSFWS as a high priority

target group for ES services.

II. Current Actions

This is a request for OMB approval

under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
64180 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 240 / Thursday, December 14, 1995 / Notices

1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)) of an

extension to an existing collection of

information previously approved and

assigned OMB Control No. 1205–0039.

There is no change in burden.

Type of Review: Extension.

Agency: Employment and Training

Administration, Labor.

Titles: Services to Migrant and

Seasonal Farmworkers Report and

Employment Service Complaint Referral

Record.

OMB Number: 1205–0039.

Frequency: Quarterly and on

occasion, respectively.

Affected Public: State governments.

Number of Respondents: 208.

Estimated Cost Per Respondent: No

cost to respondent.

Estimated Burden Hours: 5530.

Complaint Log Maintenance

1. Recordkeeping

Number of recordkeepers—168

Annual hours per recordkeeper—6.3

Recordkeepers hours—1,059

2. Processing ETA Form 8429

Annual number of forms—2,520

Minutes per form—8

Processing hours—327

Outreach Log

1. Recordkeeping

Number of recordkeepers—150

Annual hours per recordkeeper—26

Recordkeepers hours—3,900

2. Data Collection/Reporting ETA 5148

Annual number of reports—208

Minutes per report—70

Recordkeeping hours—244

Comments submitted in response to

this notice will be summarized and/or

included in the request for Office

Management and Budget approval of the

information collection request; they will

also become a matter of public record.

Dated: December 8, 1995.

John M. Robinson,

Deputy Assistant Secretary, Employment

Training Administration.

[FR Doc. 95–30481 Filed 12–13–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

Proposed Information Collection

Request Submitted for Public

Comment and Recommendations;

Forms for Agricultural Recruitment

System

AGENCY: Employment and Training

Administration, Labor.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, as

part of its continuing effort to reduce

paperwork and respondent burden

conducts a preclearance consultation

program to provide the general public

and Federal agencies with an

opportunity to comment on proposed

and/or continuing collections of

information in accordance with the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

(PRA95) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This

program helps to ensure that requested

data can be provided in the desired

format, reporting burden (time and

financial resources) is minimized,

collection instruments are clearly

understood, and the impact of collection

requirements on respondents can be

properly assessed. Currently, the

Employment and Training

Administration is soliciting comments

concerning the proposed extension of

the information collection of the

Agricultural and Food Processing

Clearance Order, Form ETA–790,

Agricultural and Food Processing

Clearance Memorandum, Form ETA–

795, Migrant Worker Itinerary, Form

ETA–785, and Job Service Manifest

Record, Form ETA–785A.

A copy of the proposed information

collection request can be obtained by

contacting the employee listed below in

the contact section of this notice.

DATES: Written comments must be

submitted on or before February 12,

1996. Written comments should

evaluate whether the proposed

collection of information is necessary

for the proper performance of the

functions of the agency, including

whether the information will have

practical utility; evaluate the accuracy

of the agency’s estimate of the burden of

the proposed collection of information

including the validity of the

methodology and assumptions used;

enhance the quality, utility, and clarity

of the information to be collected; and

minimize the burden of the collection of

information on those who are to

respond, including through the use of

appropriate automated, electronic,

mechanical, or other technological

automated, electronic, mechanical, or

other technological collection

techniques or other forms of information

technology, e.g., permitting electronic

submission of responses.

ADDRESS: David L. Webb, U.S.

Employment Service, Employment and

Training Administration, Department of

Labor, Room N–4470, 200 Constitution

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210,

202–219–5174 (this is not a toll-free

number).

I. Background

The Migrant and Seasonal

Farmworker regulations at 20 CFR

653.500 establish procedures for

agricultural clearance activity. Federal

regulations at 20 CFR 653.501 (f) (1)

require all local offices to use the

interstate clearance forms, as prescribed

by ETA.

Local and State Employment offices

use the Agricultural and Food

Processing Clearance Order to extend

job orders beyond their jurisdictions.

Applicant holding local offices use the

Agricultural Clearance Memorandum to

give notice of action on a clearance

order, request additional information,

report results, and to accept or reject the

extended job order. State agencies use

the Migrant Worker Itinerary to transmit

employment and supportive service

information to labor-demand areas, and

to assist migrant workers in obtaining

employment. The Job Service Manifest

Record shows names, addresses, and

characteristics of all people named on

the Migrant Worker Itinerary.

II. Current Actions

This is a request for OMB approval

under the Paperwork Reduction Act of

1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506 (c) (2) (A) of an

extension to an existing collection of

information previously approved and

assigned OMB Control No. 1205–0134.

There is no change in burden.

Type of Review: Extension.

Agency: Employment and Training

Administration, Labor.

Titles: Agricultural and Food

Processing Clearance Order,

Agricultural Clearance Memorandum,

Migrant Worker Itinerary, and Job

Service Manifest Record.

OMB Number: 1205–0134.

Frequency: On occasion.

Affected Public: Individuals and

households, employers, and State

Governments.

Number of Respondents: 52.

Estimated Time Per Respondent:

Form Volume

per year

Hours per

response

ETA–790 ............... 2,000 1.0

ETA–795 ............... 3,000 .5

ETA–785 ............... 3,500 .5

ETA–785A ............ 2,500 .5

Total Estimated Cost: None.

Total Burden Hours:

Form Hours per

year

ETA–790 ..................................... 2,000

ETA–795 ..................................... 1,500

ETA–785 ..................................... 1,750

ETA–785A .................................. 1,250

Total ................................. 6,500

Comments submitted in response to

this notice will be summarized and/or

included in the request for Office of

Management and Budget approval of the