65724 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 244 / Wednesday, December 20, 1995 / Notices

Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591;

telephone (202) 267–7470.

This notice is published pursuant to

paragraphs (c), (e), and (g) of § 11.27 of

part 11 of the Federal Aviation

Regulations (14 CFR part 11).

Donald P. Byrne,

Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations.

Petitions for Exemptions

Docket No.: 28367.

Petitioner: Mr. Stephen R. Raklovits.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

103.11.

Description of Relief Sought: To

permit Mr. Raklovits to operate a

powered parachute-type ultralight at

night, for the purpose of conducting

demonstrations and training, and for

special uses including search, rescue,

and surveillance, for local, State, and

Federal law enforcement agencies.

Docket No.: 28381.

Petitioner: Air Transport Association

of America.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

121.613.

Description of Relief Sought: To

permit ATA’s member airlines and other

similarly situated part 121 operators to

dispatch or release aircraft for

operations to any destination airport

under instrument flight rule or over-thetop when weather reports or forecasts,

or any combination thereof, indicate

that the weather conditions at the

estimated time of arrival at the

destination airport may be below

meteorological visibility minimums,

subject to certain conditions and

limitations.

Docket No.: 28385.

Petitioner: Mr. John B. Milan.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

121.383(c).

Description of Relief Sought: To

permit Mr. Milan to act as a pilot in

operations conducted under part 121

after reaching his 60th birthday.

Docket No.: 28386.

Petitioner: Heart of Georgia Technical

Institute.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

141.35(d) (2) and (3).

Description of Relief Sought: To allow

the Heart of Georgia Technical Institute

to designate Mr. William James

Breazeale to serve as chief flight

instructor without meeting certain

experience requirements for such a

designation.

Docket No.: 28395.

Petitioner: Air Transport Association

of America.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

121.434(c)(1)(ii).

Description of Relief Sought: To

permit an appropriately trained

qualified and authorized check airman,

in lieu of an FAA inspector, to observe

a qualifying pilot in command who is

completing the initial or upgrade

training specified in § 121.424.

Dispositions of Petitions

Docket No.: 24256.

Petitioner: Dalfort Training, L.P.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

61.55(b)(2); 61.56(c)(1); 61.57 (c) and

(d); 61.58 (c)(1) and (d); 61.63 (c)(2) and

(d)(2) and (3); 61.65 (c), (e)(2) and (3),

and (g); 61.67(d)(2); 61.157 (d)(1) and (2)

and (e) (1) and (2); 61.191(c); and

appendix A of part 61.

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To extend Exemption No.

4955, as amended, which permits

Dalfort Training, L.P., to use FAAapproved simulators to meet certain

flight experience requirements of part

61. Grant, November 22, 1995,

Exemption No. 4955E.

Docket No.: 26903.

Petitioner: The Embassy of the

Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

SFAR 66–2.

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit the operation of

an aircraft carrying delegates from both

the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and

the Bosnian Serb-Controlled Areas of

the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovnia

to operate to, within, and from the

United States to and from a point within

Bosnia and Montenegro. Grant, October

27, 1995, Exemption No. 6196.

Docket No.: 27457.

Petitioner: Daniel Webster College.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

141.35(d)(2).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To extend Exemption No.

5829, which permits Ms. Robin L. Bray

to serve as chief flight instructor at

Daniel Webster College administering

courses of training other than those that

lead to the issuance of a private pilot

certificate or rating, or an instrument

rating or a rating with instrument

privileges, without the required

minimum of 2,000 hours as pilot in

command. Grant, November 7, 1995,

Exemption No. 5829A.

Docket No.: 27960.

Petitioner: Rogers Helicopters, Inc.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

43.3(g).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To allow appropriately

trained pilots employed by Rogers

Helicopters, Inc., (RHI) to remove and/

or replace the passenger seats and

approved stretchers on aircraft used in

operations conducted by RHI under part

135. Grant, October 24, 1995,

Exemption No. 6194.

Docket No.: 28110.

Petitioner: McKeeman Productions,

Inc., d.b.a. SkySports International.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

105.43(a).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To allow nonstudent

parachutists who are foreign nationals

(foreign parachutists) to participate in

SkySports-sponsored jumping events

without complying with the parachute

equipment and packing requirements of

the FAR. Grant, November 22, 1995,

Exemption No. 6228.

Docket No.: 28232.

Petitioner: Summit Jet Corp.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

91.511(a) and 135.165(b) (6) and (7).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Summit Jet Corp

to operate its Lear 55 turbojet airplane

(Registration No. N123LC, Serial No.

045) in extended overwater operations

equipped with only one high-frequency

(HF) communication system. Grant,

November 3, 1995, Exemption No. 6226.

Docket No.: 28237.

Petitioner: PreMair, Inc.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

61.55(b)(2); 61.56(c)(1); 61.57 (c) and

(d); 61.58 (c)(1) and (d); 61.63 (c)(2) and

(d) (2) and (3); 61.65(c)(e) (2) and (3),

and (g); 61.67(d)(2); 61.157 (d)(1) and (2)

and (e)(1) and (2); 61.191(c); and

appendix A of part 61.

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit PremAir to use

FAA-approved simulators to meet

certain flight experience requirements of

part 61. Grant, November 7, 1995,

Exemption No. 6190.

[FR Doc. 95–30924 Filed 12–19–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

Notice of Intent To Rule on Application

To Use the Revenue From a Passenger

Facility Charge (PFC) at Manchester

Airport

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of Intent to Rule on

Application.

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and

invites public comment on the

application to use the revenue from a

Passenger Facility Charge at Manchester

Airport under the provisions of the

Aviation Safety and Capacity Expansion

Act of 1990 (Title IX of the Omnibus

Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990)

(Public Law 101–508) and Part 158 of

the Federal Aviation Regulations (14

CFR Part 158).
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 244 / Wednesday, December 20, 1995 / Notices 65725

DATES: Comments must be received on

or before January 19, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this

application may be mailed or delivered

in triplicate to the FAA at the following

address:

Federal Aviation Administration, Airport

Division, 12 New England Executive Park,

Burlington, Massachusetts 01803.

In addition, one copy of any

comments submitted to the FAA must

be mailed or delivered to Mr. Alfred

Testa, Jr., Airport Director for

Manchester Airport at the following

address: Manchester Airport, One

Airport Road, Suite 300, Manchester,

New Hampshire, 03103.

Air carriers and foreign air carriers

may submit copies of written comments

previously provided to the City of

Manchester under § 158.23 of Part 158

of the Federal Aviation Regulations.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Priscilla A. Scott, Airports Program

Specialist, Federal Aviation

Administration, Airports Division, 12

New England Executive Park,

Burlington, Massachusetts 01803, (617)

238–7614. The application may be

reviewed in person at 16 New England

Executive Park, Burlington,

Massachusetts.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA

proposes to rule and invites public

comment on the application to use the

revenue from a Passenger Facility

Charge (PFC) at Manchester Airport

under the provisions of the Aviation

Safety and Capacity Expansion Act of

1990 (Title IX of the Omnibus Budget

Reconciliation Act of 1990) (Pub. L.

101–508) and Part 158 of the Federal

Aviation Regulations (14 CFR Part 158).

On December 5, 1995, the FAA

determined that the application to use

the revenue from a PFC submitted by

the City of Manchester was substantially

complete within the requirements of

§ 158.25 of Part 158 of the Federal

Aviation Regulations. The FAA will

approve or disapprove the application,

in whole or in part, no later than March

5, 1996.

The following is a brief overview of

the use application.

PFC Project #: 96–02–U–00–MHT

Level of the proposed PFC: $3.00

Charge effective date: January 1, 1993

Estimated charge expiration date: March

1, 1997

Estimated total net PFC revenue:

$1,100,000

Brief description of project: Part 150

Noise Mitigation/Residential

Soundproofing/Land Acquisition.

Class or classes of air carriers which

the public agency has requested not be

required to collect PFCs: On demand

Air Taxi/Commercial Operators (ATCO).

Any person may inspect the

application in person at the FAA office

listed above under FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT.

In addition, any person may, upon

request, inspect the application, notice

and other documents germane to the

application in person at the Manchester

Airport, One Airport Road, Suite 300,

Manchester, New Hampshire 03103:

Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts on

December 12, 1995.

Vincent A. Scarano,

Manager, Airports Division, New England

Region.

[FR Doc. 95–30918 Filed 12–19–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

Federal Highway Administration

Environmental Impact Statement:

Brunswick and New Hanover Counties,

NC

AGENCY: Federal Highway

Administration (FHWA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

SUMMARY: The FHWA is issuing this

notice to advise the public that an

environmental impact statement will be

prepared for a proposed highway project

in Brunswick and New Hanover

Counties, North Carolina.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roy

C. Shelton, Operations Engineer, 310

New Bern Avenue, Suite 410, Raleigh,

North Carolina 27601, Telephone (919)

856–4350.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

FHWA in cooperation with the North

Carolina Department of Transportation

(NCDOT) will prepare an environmental

impact statement (EIS) on a proposal to

relocate US 17 in Brunswick and New

Hanover Counties, North Carolina. The

proposed improvement would involve

the relocation of the existing US 17 from

US 421 to existing US 17 south of

Wilmington. The proposed action is

considered necessary to provide for the

existing and projected traffic demand.

Alternatives under consideration

include: (1) The ‘‘no-build,’’ (2) two

build alternatives for constructing a

four-lane full control of access freeway

on new location, and (3) improvements

to existing US 421 and US 17/74/76.

Letters describing the proposed action

and soliciting comments have been sent

to appropriate Federal, State and local

agencies, and to private organizations

and citizens who have previously

expressed or are known to have interest

in this proposal. A complete public

involvement program has been

developed for this project to include:

the distribution of newsletters to

interested parties, along with public

meetings and a public hearing to be held

in this project study area. A toll-free

project telephone ‘‘hotline’’ is also being

made available. Information on the time

and place of the public hearing will be

provided in the local news media. The

draft EIS will be available for public and

agency review and comment prior to the

public hearing.

To ensure that the full range of issues

related to this proposed action are

addressed and all significant issues are

identified, comments and suggestions

are invited from all interested parties.

Comments or questions concerning this

proposed action and the EIS should be

directed to the FHWA at the address

provided above.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance

Program Number 20.205, Highway Research,

Planning and Construction. The regulations

implementing Executive Order 12372

regarding intergovernmental consultation on

Federal programs and activities apply to this

program.

Issued on: December 8, 1995.

Roy C. Shelton,

Operations Engineer, Raleigh, NC.

[FR Doc. 95–30843 Filed 12–19–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–22–M

Research and Special Programs

Administration

[Docket No. PS–142; Notice 2]

Considerations for a Program

Framework for Risk Management

Demonstrations

AGENCY: Office of Pipeline Safety, DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The Research and Special

Programs Administration’s (RSPA)

Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS) is

considering how to implement a

program administrative framework to

receive, analyze, accept, monitor and

revise risk management plans that

interstate natural gas transmission and

hazardous liquid pipeline companies

would submit as risk management

demonstration projects. RSPA is not yet

prepared to consider a conceptual

administrative framework for intrastate

companies.

A demonstration project framework is

needed to validate benefits in applying

risk management in the pipeline

industry and to determine how it would

work most effectively. A framework is

also needed to evaluate the use of