alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1


                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Scott Barek, certify that:

         1.       I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on
                  Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
                  covered by this report on Form 10-K of the Corporate Backed
                  Callable Trust Certificates, J.C. Penney Debenture-Backed
                  Series 2007-1 Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

         2.       Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,
                  taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a
                  material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
                  make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
                  under which such statements were made, not misleading with
                  respect to the period covered by this report;

         3.       Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution servicing and
                  other information required to be provided under Form 10-D
                  for the period covered by this report is included in the
                  Exchange Act periodic reports;

         4.       Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement
                  required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB,
                  and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic
                  reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under
                  the servicing or similar agreement in all material respects;
                  and

         5.       All of the reports on assessment of compliance with
                  servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their
                  related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with
                  servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to
                  be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of
                  Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
                  been included as an exhibit to this report, except as
                  otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
                  of noncompliance described in such reports have been
                  disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank National
Association, as Trustee.

Date: March 26, 2008

/s/ Scott Barek
-------------------------
Name:   Scott Barek
Title:  Senior Vice President
(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lionbridge Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Rory J. Cowan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Donald M. Muir, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 6, 2010



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ RORY J. COWAN      
|Rory J. Cowan          
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|/s/ DONALD M. MUIR     
|Donald M. Muir         
|Chief Financial Officer
[665 NE2d 186, 642 NYS2d 616]

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Francis Di Donato, Appellant.

Argued. February 14, 1996;

decided March 21, 1996

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*O’Connell & Aronowitz,*Saratoga Springs *(Dean H. Higgins*of counsel), for appellant.

*Robert M. Carney, District Attorney*of Schenectady County, Schenectady *(Alfred D. Chapleau*of counsel), for respondent.

*993OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant was convicted upon his plea of guilty of two counts of murder in the second degree and one count of burglary in the first degree and sentenced to an indeterminate term in prison. The Appellate Division affirmed the judgment.

Upon this appeal he challenges a ruling of the court which denied his motion to file a late notice of intention to present psychiatric evidence. The motion was made some 15 months after his plea of not guilty to the indictment *(see,*CPL 250.10). The court denied the motion, concluding defendant had failed to excuse the delay or present sufficient evidence to support the mental defect defense. Defendant maintains that the ruling was erroneous and that he may appeal it notwithstanding his plea of guilty. The ruling is not within that limited group of questions which survive a plea and may subsequently be raised on appeal *(see, People v Callahan,*80 NY2d 273, 280; *People v Seaberg,*74 NY2d 1, 10; *People v Taylor,*65 NY2d 1, 5). It was a discretionary ruling, addressing procedural timeliness, and defendant’s ability to challenge it was forfeited by his plea *(see, People v Petgen,*55 NY2d 529, 534).

Nor may defendant raise the issue because his plea was expressly conditioned on his right to appeal the ruling. Generally, conditional pleas are not accepted in New York (see, *People v O’Brien,*84 AD2d 567, *affd,*56 NY2d 1009; *see also, People v Di Raffaele, 55*NY2d 234, 240; *People v Thomas,*53 NY2d 338).

Insofar as defendant urges that under the circumstances his plea was not knowing or voluntary, that contention must be addressed in a proceeding pursuant to article 440 of the Criminal Procedure Law.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith and Ciparick concur; Judge Levine taking no part.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 240 (Thursday, December 14, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 64138]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30470]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
48 CFR Part 242

[DFARS Case 91-085D]


Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Personal 
Services Compensation

AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD).

ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense has decided to withdraw a proposed 
rule published on December 6, 1994 (59 FR 62704). The rule proposed 
revisions to the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement 
(DFARS) to establish a dollar threshold for DoD contractors for 
application of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) requirements 
for contractor compensation system reviews. After review of public 
comments, DoD has determined the proposed DFARS revisions are 
unnecessary.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Defense Acquisition Regulations Council, Attn: Ms. Sandra G. Haberlin, 
PDUSD (A&T)DP(DAR), IMD 3D139, 3062 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 
20301-3062, (703) 602-0131.

Michele P. Peterson.
Executive Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations Council.
[FR Doc. 95-30470 Filed 12-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
DA 10 - 0561 

### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 20 11 MT 190N

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF STANLEY M. KNUDSON,

Deceased.

APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Twelfth Judicial District,

In and For the County of Hill, Cause No. D P 08 -47 Honorable David Rice, Presiding Judge COUNSEL OF RECORD:

For Appellants: Thomas J. Sheehy, Brian Bekker; Sheehy Law Office Big Sandy, Montana Anne Biby, Attorney at Law, Kalispell, Montana (Attorneys for Leslie Knudson and Deborah Harman) For Appellee : Kevin C. Meek, Jordan Y. Crosby; Ugrin, Alexander, Zadick & Higgins, P.C., Great Falls (Attorneys for Janet Knudson) Brian Lilletvedt, Attorney at Law, Havre, Montana (Attorney for Kyle Austin) Submitted on Briefs: July 27, 2011 Decided: August 9, 2011 Filed:

__________________________________________ Clerk August 9 20112

Chief Justice Mike McGrath delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Pursuantto Section I, Paragraph 3(c) , Montana Supreme CourtI nternal Operating Rules, this case is decided by me morandum opinion andshall not be cited and does not servea sprecedent. Its case title, c ause number and disposition shall be included in this Court’s quarterly list of noncitable cases published in the Pacific Reporter and Montana Reports. ¶2 Leslie Knudson and Deborah Harman challenged the validity of the will of their father Stanley M. Knudson on the ground that it was executed under the undue influence of their sister Janet Knudson and her son Kyle Austin. In July, 2010, following a fourday trial , the jury determin ed that the challenged will was not the product of undue influence. On August 5, 2010 the District Court entered judgment validating the will and admitting it to probate. Leslie and Deborah appeal. We affirm. ¶3 Stanley Knudson died in A pril, 2008. S tanley executed the will at issue on May 10, 2004, revoking a prior will executed in 2001. The 2004 will left the bulk of Stanley’s estate to Janet and Kyle . Leslie and Deborah challenge the District Court’s decisions to exclude evidence th at Kyle made an offer to buy Stanley’s farm in 2008 and evidence that Kyle and Janet had accus ed Stanley’s companion Minnie Simko of improperly medicating him, also in 2008 . ¶4 Both parties ag

ree that a district court’s broad discretion to determine whether ev idence is relevant and admissible is reviewed for abuse of discretion. We hav e3

rev iewed the proffered evidence and the District Court’s rulings and find that the District Court did not abuse its discretion by excluding the evidence. ¶5 Affirmed. /S/ MIKEMcGRATH We concur: /S/ MICHAEL E WHEAT /S/ JIM RICE /S/ PATRICIA COTTER /S/ JAMES C. NELSON
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5385 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5385

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 9, 2014

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 55 Grasso Plaza in St. Louis, Missouri, as the ``Sgt. Amanda N. 
                         Pinson Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SGT. AMANDA N. PINSON POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 55 Grasso Plaza in St. Louis, Missouri, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Sgt. Amanda N. Pinson Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sgt. 
Amanda N. Pinson Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 8, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4606 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/08/19 07:49:57 Page 1 of

7
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4606 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/08/19 07:49:57 Page 2 of

7
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4606 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/08/19 07:49:57 Page 3 of

7
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4606 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/08/19 07:49:57 Page 4 of

7
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4606 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/08/19 07:49:57 Page 5 of

7
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4606 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/08/19 07:49:57 Page 6 of

7
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4606 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/08/19 07:49:57 Page 7 of

7
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5740 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the maximum age for 

children eligible for medical care under the CHAMPVA program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 19, 2014 

Mr. FORTENBERRY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the 

maximum age for children eligible for medical care under 

the CHAMPVA program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Dependents’ 

5 Parity Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5740 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE OF MAXIMUM AGE FOR CHILDREN ELIGI2 BLE FOR MEDICAL CARE UNDER CHAMPVA 

3 PROGRAM. 

4 (a) INCREASE.—Subsection (c) of section 1781 of 

5 title 38, United States Code, is amended to read as fol6 lows: 

7 ‘‘(c)(1) Notwithstanding clauses (i) and (iii) of sec8 tion 101(4)(A) of this title, for purposes of this section, 

9 a child who is eligible for benefits under subsection (a) 

10 shall be eligible for benefits under this section until the 

11 child’s 26th birthday, regardless of the marital status of 

12 the child or whether the child is pursuing a full-time 

13 course of instruction at an educational institution. 

14 ‘‘(2) This subsection shall not be construed to limit 

15 eligibility for coverage of a child described in section 

16 101(4)(A)(ii) of this title.’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Such subsection, as so 

18 amended, shall apply with respect to medical care provided 

19 on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 235 (Thursday, December 7, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 62879]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-29851]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[ID-060-1610-00]


Notice of Resource Advisory Council Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Upper Columbia--Salmon Clearwater 
Districts, Interior.

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), 5 U.S.C. 
Appendix, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) announces the meeting of 
the Upper Columbia--Salmon Clearwater Districts Resource Advisory 
Council (RAC) on Thursday, January 18 and Friday, January 19, 1996 in 
Coeur d'Alene, Idaho. The meeting will be held at the Bureau of Land 
Management office at 1808 North Third Street in Coeur d'Alene.
    The agenda for the two day meeting includes a one day training 
session for RAC members on team building, presentations by BLM 
personnel on rangeland ecology and possible standards and guidelines, 
election of officers and other administrative issues.

DATES: The RAC will meet on January 18, 1996 from 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 
p.m. and on Friday, January 19, 1996 from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. The 
public may address the Council during the public comment period on 
January 19, 1996 starting at 1:30 p.m.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: All Resource Advisory Council meetings are 
open to the public. Interested persons may make oral statements to the 
Council, or written statements may be submitted for the Council's 
consideration. Depending on the number of persons wishing to make oral 
statements, a per-person time limit may be established by the District 
Manager.
    The purpose of the Council is to advise the Secretary of the 
Interior, through the BLM, on a variety of planning and management 
issues associated with management of public lands. The Council's 
responsibilities include providing advice on long-range planning and 
establishing resource management priorities; and assisting the BLM to 
identify State and regional standards for ecological health and 
guidelines for grazing.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ted Graf (208) 769-5004.

    Dated: November 28, 1995.
Jenifer Arnold,
Acting District Manager.
[FR Doc. 95-29851 Filed 12-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1916-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2010-0002]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Mississippi (FEMA-1916-DR), dated May 14, 2010, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         May 28, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Mississippi is hereby amended to include the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of May 14, 2010.

Panola County for Public Assistance.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2010-13699 Filed 6-7-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members         
    -  AEE Multimedia 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# PHOTOS ANDVIDEOS

Search

Search

                                - All Images 
                                - Other 
                                - Space Shuttle 

                                - Upload Date
                                - Photo Date
                                - Title

----

Download Image: Full Size (1.13 MB)

Tags:USSPACECOM, Global Sentinel, GS24

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery