64314 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 241 / Friday, December 15, 1995 / Rules and Regulations

7.5.1 Subscriber Lines

Host llll (Incl. DDI Concentrator Lines)

RST 1 llll

RST 2 llll

RST 3 llll

Total llll

* * * * *

10. Miscellaneous Operating Features

10.1 Busy Verification

10.1.1 By dedicated trunk from toll

operator: ll

10.1.1.1 One-Way, Inward ll

10.1.1.2 Two-Way (Busy verification

inward, intercept outward) ll

10.1.2 By prefix digit over intertoll trunk

ll

(Indicate digit(s) dialed) ll

10.1.3 Access by Switchman

10.1.3.1 Dedicated Trunk ll

10.1.3.2 Multiple of Operator Trunk ll

10.2 Intercept Facilities

10.2.1 Vacant code, disconnected number,

and unassigned number intercept shall

be: (Check One)

By recorded announcement:

Without cut-through to operator ll

With cut-through to operator ll

By operator ll

10.2.2 Changed number intercept shall be:

(Check One)

By recorded announcement:

Without cut-through to operator ll

With cut-through to operator ll

By operator ll

By automatic intercept system (AIS) in

distant office ll

10.2.3 Method of Reaching Operator, if

required:

Separate trunk group ll

Regular interoffice toll trunks with idle

trunk selecting over at least three trunks

when three or more toll trunks are

equipped ll

10.2.4 Number of separate intercept trunk

circuits ll

10.3 Line Load Control

10.3.1 Line load control facilities are:

ll Required ll Not Required

(Explain in Item 16, Appendix A)

10.4 Service Observing Facilities

10.4.1 Service observing facilities are:

ll Required ll Not Required

(Explain in Item 16, Appendix A)

10.5 Hotel-Motel Arrangements

10.5.1 Hotel-motel arrangements for

operation of message registers at the

subscriber’s premises are:

ll Required ll Not Required

(Explain in Item 16, Appendix A)

10.5.1.1 How are message registers to be

activated?

Line Reversal ll

Third Wire ll

Other ll

(Explain in Item 16, Appendix A)

10.6 Nailed-Up Connections

ll Required ll Not Required

(Explain in Item 16, Appendix A)

10.7 Vertical Services: (RST Lines are

Included)

Initially Ultimate

10.7.1 Call Waiting—No. of Lines ............................................................................................... llllll llllll

10.7.2 Call Forwarding—No. of Lines ......................................................................................... llllll llllll

llLocal llRemote

(Explain in Item 16, Appendix A).

10.7.3 Abbreviated Dialing No. of Lines ..................................................................................... llllll llllll

No. of Codes per Line llfor llLines

No. of Codes per Line llfor llLines

10.7.4 Three-Way Calling—No. of Lines ..................................................................................... llllll llllll

CCS Per Line ..................................................................................................................... llllll llllll

10.7.5 Other ll

(Explain in Item 16, Appendix A)

* * * * *

Appendix B to 7 CFR 1755.522—

[Amended]

4. Appendix B to 7 CFR 1755.522 is

amended by removing items 1.2 and 1.3

and redesignating items 1.4 through 1.9

as items 1.2 through 1.7, respectively.

5. Appendix C to 7 CFR 1755.522 is

amended by revising item 3.1.3.1 to read

as follows:

Appendix C to 7 CFR 1755.522—

Specifications for Digital, Stored

Program Controlled Central Office

Equipment Detailed Requirements—

Bidder Supplied Information

* * * * *

3.1.3.1 The number of directory numbers

provided shall be based on the total

directory numbers required (Item 6.1.11,

appendix A), as modified by the memory

increment of the proposed system.

* * * * *

Dated: October 30, 1995.

Jill Long Thompson,

Under Secretary, Rural Economic and

Community Development.

[FR Doc. 95–27395 Filed 12–14–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410–15–P—M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Office of Energy Efficiency and

Renewable Energy

10 CFR Part 440

[Docket No. EE–RM–94–401]

Weatherization Assistance Program for

Low-Income Persons

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: The Department of Energy

(DOE) is publishing a rule finalizing

amendments to the regulations for the

Weatherization Assistance Program for

Low-Income Persons that changed the

formula used to distribute funds among

the States under the Program.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 15, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Greg

Reamy, Weatherization Assistance

Program Division, U.S. Department of

Energy, Mail Stop EE–532, 1000

Independence Avenue, SW.,

Washington, DC 20585, (202) 426–1698.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DOE

issued an interim final rule on June 5,

1995 (60 FR 29469) that amended the

formula used to distribute funds among

the States under the Weatherization

Assistance Program. Those changes

were based on direction in the

Conference Report on the Department of

Interior and Related Agencies

Appropriations Act of 1995 which

accompanied Public Law 103–332. DOE

received no comments on the interim

final rule. Accordingly, the interim final

rule is adopted as a final rule without

change.

List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 440

Definitions and allocation of funds.
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 241 / Friday, December 15, 1995 / Rules and Regulations 64315

Issued in Washington, DC on December 8,

1995.

Christine A. Ervin,

Assistant Secretary, Energy Efficiency and

Renewable Energy.

10 CFR Part 440—Weatherization

Assistance Program for Low-Income

Persons

Under the authority of 42 U.S.C.

6861–6871 and 42 U.S.C. 7191, the

interim final rule amending 10 CFR Part

440, which was published on June 5,

1995 (60 FR 29469), is adopted as a final

rule without change.

[FR Doc. 95–30591 Filed 12–14–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 25

[Docket No. NM–112; Special Conditions

No. 25–ANM–108]]

Special Conditions: Gulfstream

Aerospace Corporation, Model

Gulfstream V, High Altitude Operations

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Final special conditions;

correction.

SUMMARY: In the October 17, 1995, issue

of the Federal Register, the Federal

Aviation Administration (FAA)

published final special conditions No.

25–ANM–108 for the Gulfstream

Aerospace Corporation, Model

Gulfstream V airplane (High Altitude

Operations). The special conditions as

published contain two errors; an

incorrect paragraph reference, and a

mistype made by the Federal Register.

This document corrects those errors.

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 16, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Gerald Lakin, FAA, Standardization

Branch, ANM–113, Transport Airplane

Directorate, Aircraft Certification

Service, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,

Renton, Washington 98055–4056,

telephone (206) 227–1187.

Adoption of the Correction

Special Conditions No 25–ANM–108,

published in the Federal Register on

October 17, 1995 (60 FR 53691) is

corrected as follows:

On page 53691, column 3, under

‘‘Novel or Unusual Design Features,’’

paragraph 4, second sentence, remove

‘‘grown’’ and substitute ‘‘growth’’ in its

place.

On page 53693, column 3, under ‘‘4

Pressurization,’’ subparagraph (c),

remove the reference to ‘‘paragraphs d.1.

and d.2.’’ and substitute ‘‘paragraph 4(a)

and 4(b)’’ in its place.

Issued in Renton, Washington, on

December 6, 1995.

Darrell M. Pederson,

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service,

ANM–100.

[FR Doc. 95–30552 Filed 12–14–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 95–NM–75–AD; Amendment

39–9450; AD 95–25–05]

Airworthiness Directives; Beech Model

400A Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a

new airworthiness directive (AD),

applicable to certain Beech Model 400A

airplanes, that requires an inspection to

verify if the securing rivet is installed on

the rod end of the control push rods of

the spoiler flight control system, an

inspection to verify if the jam nut is

secure on the opposite end of the rod

end, and repair of any discrepancy. This

amendment is prompted by a report of

loss of roll control on the co-pilot’s

control wheel shortly after takeoff due

to a rivet missing from the control push

rod. The actions specified by this AD

are intended to ensure that the push rod

rivets are installed. Missing control

push rod rivets could result in the

disengagement of the push rod end from

the push rod tube; this could lead to

loss of roll control and subsequent

reduced controllability of the airplane

after takeoff.

DATES: Effective January 16, 1996.

The incorporation by reference of

certain publications listed in the

regulations is approved by the Director

of the Federal Register as of January 16,

1996.

ADDRESSES: The service information

referenced in this AD may be obtained

from Beech Aircraft Corporation,

Commercial Service Department, P.O.

Box 85, Wichita, Kansas 67201–0085.

This information may be examined at

the Federal Aviation Administration

(FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate,

Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,

Renton, Washington; or at the FAA,

Wichita Aircraft Certification Office,

Small Airplane Directorate, 1801

Airport Road, Room 100, Mid-Continent

Airport, Wichita, Kansas; or at the

Office of the Federal Register, 800 North

Capitol Street, NW., suite 700,

Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Larry Engler, Aerospace Engineer,

Airframe Branch, ACE–118W, FAA,

Wichita Aircraft Certification Office,

Small Airplane Directorate, 1801

Airport Road, Room 100, Mid-Continent

Airport, Wichita, Kansas 67209;

telephone (316) 946–4122; fax (316)

946–4407.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A

proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal

Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to

include an airworthiness directive (AD)

that is applicable to certain Beech

Model 400A airplanes was published in

the Federal Register on August 10, 1995

(60 FR 40782). That action proposed to

require a one-time detailed visual

inspection to verify if the securing rivet

is installed on the push rods of the

spoiler flight control system. That action

also proposed to require an inspection

to verify if the jam nut is secure on the

opposite rod end, and repair of any

discrepancy.

No comments were submitted in

response to the proposal or the FAA’s

determination of the cost to the public.

The FAA has determined that air safety

and the public interest require the

adoption of the rule as proposed.

There are approximately 96 Model

400A airplanes of the affected design in

the worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates

that 73 airplanes of U.S. registry will be

affected by this AD, that it will take

approximately 8 work hours per

airplane to accomplish the required

actions, and that the average labor rate

is $60 per work hour. Based on these

figures, the cost impact of the AD on

U.S. operators is estimated to be

$35,040, or $480 per airplane.

The cost impact figure discussed

above is based on assumptions that no

operator has yet accomplished any of

the requirements of this AD action, and

that no operator would accomplish

those actions in the future if this AD

were not adopted.

The regulations adopted herein will

not have substantial direct effects on the

States, on the relationship between the

national government and the States, or

on the distribution of power and

responsibilities among the various

levels of government. Therefore, in

accordance with Executive Order 12612,

it is determined that this final rule does

not have sufficient federalism

implications to warrant the preparation

of a Federalism Assessment.

For the reasons discussed above, I

certify that this action (1) is not a

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under

Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a