alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3241 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to allow claims against foreign 

states for unlawful computer intrusion, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2021 

Mr. KENNEDY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to allow claims 

against foreign states for unlawful computer intrusion, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Homeland And Cyber 

5 Threat Act’’ or the ‘‘HACT Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FOREIGN STATE COMPUTER INTRUSIONS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 97 of title 28, United 

8 States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1605B 

9 the following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3241 IS

1 ‘‘§ 1605C. Computer intrusions by a foreign state 

2 ‘‘A foreign state shall not be immune from the juris3 diction of the courts of the United States or of the States 

4 in any case not otherwise covered by this chapter in which 

5 money damages are sought against a foreign state by a 

6 national of the United States for personal injury, harm 

7 to reputation, or damage to or loss of property resulting 

8 from any of the following activities, whether occurring in 

9 the United States or a foreign state: 

10 ‘‘(1) Unauthorized access to or access exceeding 

11 authorization to a computer located in the United 

12 States. 

13 ‘‘(2) Unauthorized access to confidential, elec14 tronic stored information located in the United 

15 States. 

16 ‘‘(3) The transmission of a program, informa17 tion, code, or command to a computer located in the 

18 United States, which, as a result of such conduct, 

19 causes damage without authorization. 

20 ‘‘(4) The use, dissemination, or disclosure, with21 out consent, of any information obtained by means 

22 of any activity described in paragraph (1), (2), or 

23 (3). 

24 ‘‘(5) The provision of material support or re25 sources for any activity described in paragraph (1), 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3241 IS

1 (2), (3), or (4), including by an official, employee, or 

2 agent of such foreign state.’’. 

3 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.— 

4 The table of sections for chapter 97 of title 28, United 

5 States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relat6 ing to section 1605B the following: 

‘‘1605C. Computer intrusions by a foreign state.’’. 

7 (c) APPLICATION.—This Act and the amendments 

8 made by this Act shall apply to any action pending on 

9 or filed on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### J. FRANCIS TRON, Jr., Administrator, v. SINCLAIR REFINING COMPANY et al.

(Filed 3 December, 1930.)

Appeal by defendant, Sinclair Refining Company, from *Shaw, J.,*at August Term, 1930, of Buree.

Civil action for wrongful death brought against Sinclair Refining Company, a corporation chartered under the laws of the State of Maine, and B. D. Williams and R. A. Self, citizens and residents of Catawba County, N: O.

*817Motion by nonresident, corporate defendant, to remove cause to tbe District Court of tbe United States for tbe Western District of North Carolina for trial. Motion denied, and movant appeals.

*J. Francis Tron, Jr., S. J. Ervin and 8. J. Ervin, Jr., for plaintiff.*

*O. E. Cover for defendant, Sinclair Refining Company.*

Per Curiam.

Tbe petition for removal, besides showing tbe presence-of tbe requisite jurisdictional amount, asserts a right of removal on tbe ground of diverse citizenship, and alleges that tbe resident defendants have been fraudulently joined to prevent such removal.

No new question of law is presented by tbe appeal. Tbe trial court held that tbe case was controlled by tbe line of decisions of which *Givens v. Mfg. Co.,*196 N. C., 377, 145 S. E., 681, and *Crisp v. Fibre Co.,*193 N. C., 77, 136 S. E., 238, may be cited as fairly illustrative, while tbe appellant contends that tbe principles announced in *Cox v. Lumber Co.,*193 N. C., 28, 136 S. E., 254; *Johnson v. Lumber Co.,*189 N. C., 81, 126 S. E., 165, and *Rea v. Mirror Co.,*158 N. C., 24, 73 S. E., 116, are more nearly applicable. No error in tbe ruling of tbe trial court has been shown.

Affirmed.
USAG-Miami

Financial Readiness Program Services

Contact the POC to schedule group, individual, & family sessions:

• Financial Literacy Training (Junior Enlisted/Officer for allservices)

• Financial Literacy Training (Community & Youth)

• Personal Financial Counseling (all eligible members)

• Personal Spending Plans to meet (short/medium/long-term) goals

• Prescreening and counselling for the Family SubsistenceSupplemental

Assistance Program

• Develop strategies to meet Emergencies

• Financial Planning (Retirement, Investing, Savings, Insurance, Estate)

• Thrift Savings Plan (Enrollment, Selection, and Portfolio Review)

• Blended Retirement System (Selection and Portfolio Review)

• Credit Management and Debt Liquidation

• Credit Monitoring (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) Reports

• Credit Monitoring (FICO Credit Score Tool)

• Security Clearance Revocation Prevention

• Tax Planning (manage Federal Taxes and W-4)

• Consumer Credit Counseling Services (Debt Reduction/Elimination)

• Consumer Advocacy (Service Member's Civil Relief Act)

• Consumer Dispute Resolution (Consumer Finance Protection Bureau)

• Consumer Complaint Resolution (Better Business Bureau)

• Military Emergency Relief processing (Army Emergency Relief, Navy-Marine

Corps Relief Society, Air Force Aid and Coast Guard Mutual AidSociety)

POC: Financial Readiness /Military Emergency Relief Program Manager, phone 

(305) 437-2653, DSN 567-2653. Screening is used to ensure all services are for

eligible members only.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5406 

To authorize the revocation or denial of passports and passport cards to 

individuals affiliated with foreign terrorist organizations, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2014 

Mr. POE of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To authorize the revocation or denial of passports and passport cards to individuals affiliated with foreign terrorist 

organizations, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘F.T.O. Passport Rev5 ocation Act’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5406 IH

1 SEC. 2. REVOCATION OR DENIAL OF PASSPORTS AND PASS2 PORT CARDS TO INDIVIDUALS AFFILIATED 

3 WITH FOREIGN TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS. 

4 The Act entitled ‘‘An Act to regulate the issue and 

5 validity of passports, and for other purposes’’, approved 

6 July 3, 1926 (22 U.S.C. 211a et seq.), commonly known 

7 as the ‘‘Passport Act of 1926’’, is amended by adding at 

8 the end the following: 

9 ‘‘SEC. 4. AUTHORITY TO DENY OR REVOKE PASSPORT AND 

10 PASSPORT CARD. 

11 ‘‘(a) INELIGIBILITY.— 

12 ‘‘(1) ISSUANCE.—Except as provided under 

13 subsection (b), the Secretary of State may not issue 

14 a passport or passport card to any individual whom 

15 the Secretary has determined is a member of or is 

16 otherwise affiliated with, or is aiding, assisting, abet17 ting, or is otherwise helping an organization the Sec18 retary has designated as a foreign terrorist organiza19 tion pursuant to section 219 of the Immigration and 

20 Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189). 

21 ‘‘(2) REVOCATION.—The Secretary of State 

22 shall revoke a passport or passport card previously 

23 issued to any individual described in paragraph (1). 

24 ‘‘(b) EXCEPTIONS.— 

25 ‘‘(1) EMERGENCY AND HUMANITARIAN SITUA26 TIONS.—Notwithstanding subsection (a), the SecVerDate Mar 15 2010 20:55 Sep 09, 2014 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5406.IH H5406

tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5406 IH

1 retary of State may issue a passport or passport 

2 card, in emergency circumstances or for humani3 tarian reasons, to an individual described in para4 graph (1) of such subsection. 

5 ‘‘(2) LIMITATION FOR RETURN TO UNITED

6 STATES.—Notwithstanding subsection (a)(2), the 

7 Secretary of State, before revocation, may— 

8 ‘‘(A) limit a previously issued passport or 

9 passport card only for return travel to the 

10 United States; or 

11 ‘‘(B) issue a limited passport or passport 

12 card that only permits return travel to the 

13 United States. 

14 ‘‘(c) REPORT.—If the Secretary of State issues or 

15 limits a passport or passport card under subsection (b), 

16 the Secretary shall, not later than 30 days after such 

17 issuance or limitation, submit to Congress a report on 

18 such issuance or limitation, as the case may be.’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**MOORE
        & ASSOCIATES, CHARTERED**
 ***ACCOUNTANTS
        AND ADVISORS***
 ***PCAOB
        REGISTERED***
 
  
 **CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
 
  We
        consent to the use, in the statement on Form 10-K of Ecoland International,
        Inc.
        (A Development Stage Company) of our report dated August 29, 2008 on our
        audit
        of the financial statements of Ecoland International, Inc. (A Development
        Stage
        Company) as of May 31, 2008, and the related consolidated statements of
        operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years ended May 31, 2008
        and May 31, 2007, from inception on May 31, 1997 through May 31, 2008 and
        from
        inception on May 3, 2007 through June 30, 2008, and the reference to us under
        the caption “Experts.”
 
  
 
 
 ***/s/
        Moore & Associates, Chartered***
 Moore
        & Associates Chartered
 Las
        Vegas, Nevada
 September
        15, 2008
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 *2675
        S. Jones Blvd. Suite 109, Las Vegas, NV 89146 (702)253-7499 Fax (702)253-7501*
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 243 (Tuesday, December 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 65289]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30800]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[C-351-818]


Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate From Brazil; Termination 
of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of Termination of Countervailing Duty Administrative 
Review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On September 15, 1995 (60 R 47930), in response to a request 
from Companhia Siderurgica de Tubarao (CST), the Department of Commerce 
(the Department) initiated an administrative review of the 
countervailing duty order on certain cut-to-length carbon steel plate 
from Brazil for CST. In accordance with 19 CFR 355.22(a)(3)(1994), the 
Department is now terminating this review because CST has withdrawn its 
request for review.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 19, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Albright or Kelly Parkhill, 
Office of Countervailing Compliance, Import Administration, 
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 
Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C., 20230; 
telephone: (202) 482-2786.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On August 31, 1994, the Department received a request for an 
administrative review of this countervailing duty order from CST, a 
Brazilian exporter of the subject merchandise, for the period January 
1, 1994, through December 31, 1994. Although an importer of the subject 
merchandise, Wirth Ltd., requested a review of the scope of this order 
on the same date, no interested party other than CST requested a review 
of the countervailing duty rate. On September 15, 1994, the Department 
published in the Federal Register (60 FR 47930) a notice of 
``Initiation of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review'' initiating 
the administrative review of CST for that period. On November 13, 1995, 
CST withdrew its request for review .
    Section 355.22(a)(3) of the Department's regulations stipulates 
that the Secretary may permit a party that requests a review to 
withdraw the request not later than 90 days after the date of 
publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. In 
this case, CST has withdrawn its request for review within the 90-day 
period. Further, no other interested party requested a review of the 
countervailing duty rate in this case, and we have received no 
submissions regarding CST's withdrawal of its request for review. 
Therefore, we are terminating the review of the countervailing duty 
order on certain cut-to-length carbon steel plate from Brazil for CST.
    This notice is published in accordance with 19 CFR 355.22(a)(3).

    Dated: December 11, 1995.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Compliance.
[FR Doc. 95-30800 Filed 12-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MICHAEL ALAN WILKINS,

Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : No. 584 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 2nd day of February, 2021
, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
#### SAMUEL J. FISHER v. THE FINANCE COMPANY et al.

(Filed 10 December, 1930.)

Mortgages H Tb — In this case held: temporary order restraining foreclosure of deed of trust was properly dissolved.

The foreclosure sale under a power in a deed of trust securing the balance of purchase money will not be restrained for a breach of warranty against tax assessment liens where it is made to appear that the plaintiff had agreed to assume the assessment and receive a credit of the amount upon his note for the purchase price, the credit having been made according to the agreement.

*10Appeal by plaintiff from *Oglesby, J.,*at October Term, 1930, of Bttk combe.

Civil action to restrain sale of land under foreclosure.

From a judgment dissolving tbe temporary restraining order, the plaintiff appeals, assigning error.

*Joseph W. Little for plaintiff.*

*No counsel for defendants.*

Stacy, O. J.

Plaintiff purchased a lot of land from the defendant, the Finance Company, taking a deed therefor with full covenants of warranty, and executed a deed of trust thereon to secure payment of part of the purchase price. Foreclosure is sought to be enjoined on the ground that certain outstanding tax assessments, amounting to approximately $1,500, constitute breach of warranty in defendant’s deed. *Coble v. Dick,*194 N. C., 732, 140 S. E., 745.

There is evidence that the plaintiff subsequently agreed to assume payment of said assessments on condition that a credit of like amount be made upon his notes given for the purchase price of the land, which was done.

The temporary restraining order was, therefore, dissolved for want of meritorious showing.

Affirmed.
#### William Crandall, Respondent, v. Frank Haskins, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Landon, J.
# IV.B1

# IV.B2

# IV.B3

http://oactweb/TR/2017/lr4b3.html

# IV.B4

http://oactweb/TR/2017/VI_I_glossary.html

# V.A1

http://oactweb/TR/2017/lr5a1.html

# V.A2

http://oactweb/TR/2017/lr5a2.html

# V.A3

# V.A4

# V.A5

# V.B1

# V.B2

# V.C4

# V.C5

# V.C7

http://oactweb/TR/2017/lr5c7.htmlhttp://oactweb/TR/2017/lr5c7.html

# VI.G2

# VI.G4

# VI.G5

# VI.G6

# VI.G7

# VI.G8

# VI.G9

# VI.G10
# Email Protection

## You are unable to access this email address srbc.gov

The website from which you got to this page is protected by Cloudflare. Email addresses on that page have been hidden in order to keep them from being accessed by malicious bots. **You must enable Javascript in your browser in order to decode the e-mail address**.

If you have a website and are interested in protecting it in a similar way, you can sign up for Cloudflare.

                  - How does Cloudflare protect email addresses on website from spammers?
                  - Can I sign up for Cloudflare?

Cloudflare Ray ID: **892f93010c1528f5**•      Your IP:      Click to reveal3.138.183.43•Performance & security byCloudflare
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 16-10002

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:15-cr-00210-JDW-AEP-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CINDY S. CARABEO,

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(September 15, 2016)

Before TJOFLAT, JULIE CARNES and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Case: 16-10002 Date Filed: 09/15/2016 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Adeel Bashir, appointed counsel for Cindy Carabeo in this direct criminal 

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and 

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. 

Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that 

counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because 

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, 

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Carabeo’s conviction and 

sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case: 16-10002 Date Filed: 09/15/2016 Page: 2 of 2
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of
Apple REIT Eight, Inc.
At December 31, 2009
(The state of incorporation or organization of each subsidiary is Virginia, except as noted)

A.    Direct Subsidiaries

Apple
Eight Hospitality, Inc.
Apple Eight Residential, Inc.
Apple Eight Ventures, Inc.
Apple Air Holding, LLC (24% ownership interest)

B.    Indirect Subsidiaries (held through direct subsidiaries or other indirect subsidiaries)

Apple
Eight Hospitality Management, Inc.
Apple Eight Hospitality Massachusetts, Inc.
Apple Eight Hospitality Massachusetts Services, Inc.
Apple Eight Hospitality Midwest, LLC
Apple Eight Hospitality Ownership, Inc.
Apple Eight Hospitality Texas, LLC
Apple Eight Hospitality Texas Services, LLC
Apple Eight NC GP, Inc.
Apple Eight NC LP, Inc.
Apple Eight North Carolina, L.P.
Apple Eight Overland Park, LLC
Apple Eight SPE Birmingham, Inc.
Apple Eight SPE Columbia, Inc.
Apple Eight SPE Concord, Inc.
Apple Eight SPE Fayetteville, Inc.
Apple Eight SPE Greenville, Inc.
Apple Eight SPE Hilton Head, Inc.
Apple Eight SPE Jacksonville, Inc.
Apple Eight SPE Kansas City, Inc.
Apple Eight SPE Overland Park, Inc.
Apple Eight SPE Savannah, Inc.
Apple Eight SPE Tampa, Inc.
Apple Eight SPE Westford, Inc.
Apple Eight SPE Winston-Salem, Inc.
Apple Eight Services Birmingham, Inc.
Apple Eight Services Columbia, Inc.
Apple Eight Services Concord, Inc.
Apple Eight Services Fayetteville, Inc.
Apple Eight Services Greenville, Inc.
Apple Eight Services Hilton Head, Inc.
Apple Eight Services Jacksonville, Inc.
Apple Eight Services Kansas City, Inc.
Apple Eight Services Overland Park, Inc.
Apple Eight Services Savannah, Inc.
Apple Eight Services Tampa, Inc.
Apple Eight Services Westford, Inc.
Apple Eight Services Winston-Salem, Inc.
D&D Beverage Services, LLC*

---

---



QuickLinks
AAA Free Move Ministorage,

s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

November 13, 201 3

N o. 04

- 12

- 00775

- CV

OIS INVESTMENTS INC.

, Appellant

v.

AAA FREE MOVE MINISTORAGE, LLC.

, Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 377499

Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

The panel has considered the Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing, and the motion is

DENIED.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 13th day of November, 2013

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 237 (Monday, December 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 63507]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30093]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

North American Free Trade Agreement, Article 1904 Binational 
Panel Reviews: Notice of Completion of Panel Review

AGENCY: North American Free Trade Agreement, NAFTA Secretariat, United 
States Section, International Trade Administration, Department of 
Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of completion of panel review of the final determination 
made by the U.S. International Trade Administration, in an affirmative 
countervailing duty administrative review respecting live swine from 
Canada, Secretariat File No. USA-94-1904-01.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Order of the Binational Panel dated September 
27, 1995, affirming the final determination described above was 
completed on November 13, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James R. Holbein, United States Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat, Suite 
2061, 14th and Constitution Avenue, Washington, D.C. 20230, (202) 482-
5438.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On September 27, 1995, the Binational Panel 
issued an order which affirmed the final affirmative countervailing 
duty administrative review of the United States International Trade 
Administration (``ITA'') concerning Live Swine from Canada. The 
Secretariat was instructed to issue a Notice of Completion of Panel 
Review on the 31st day following the issuance of the Notice of Final 
Panel Action, if no Request for an Extraordinary Challenge was filed. 
No such request was filed. Therefore, on the basis of the Panel Order 
and Rule 80 of the Article 1904 Panel Rules, the Panel Review was 
completed and the panelists discharged from their duties effective 
November 13, 1995.

    Dated: December 1, 1995.

James R. Holbein,

United States Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat.

[FR Doc. 95-30093 Filed 12-8-95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-GT-M
**Exhibit 31.3**

 

**Certification**

 

I, Craig J. Farr, certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of KKR Financial Holdings LLC; and

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

Date: April 23, 2014

 
|   | /s/ CRAIG J. FARR                                                              |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |  

Craig J. Farr*Chief Executive Officer   (Principal Executive Officer)* |

 

----