alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Anthony Sapp et al., Appellants, v The Propeller Company LLC et al., Respondents. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[772 NYS2d 515]

*182Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered August 27, 2003, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, denied plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

An actual eviction occurs when a landlord wrongfully ousts a tenant from physical possession of the leased premises *(Barash v Pennsylvania Term. Real Estate Corp.,*26 NY2d 77, 82-83 [1970]). Although plaintiff tenants demonstrated that, for some unspecified period following a fire, defendant landlords padlocked the building in which plaintiffs had leased premises, there are triable issues of fact as to whether the premises in question were usable at the time plaintiffs were locked out and whether defendants’ action had a lawful basis.

This question is not resolved by the prior finding of the Civil Court in a holdover proceeding brought by defendant Propeller against another tenant of the same building, that the fire damage was insufficient to provide a reasonable basis for Propeller’s decision to demolish or rebuild the building. Invocation of the doctrine of collateral estoppel is inappropriate because there was no identity of issue *(see Schwartz v Public Adm’r of County of Bronx,*24 NY2d 65, 71 [1969]). Unlike the issue before the Civil Court, the question before the motion court was whether, in the weeks immediately following the fire, defendants had a lawful basis for denying plaintiffs unrestricted entry into the building.

We have considered plaintiffs’ remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan and Gonzalez, JJ.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 23

- 00066

- CV

Abelardo G. GONZALEZ

, Appellant

v.

Alberto J. GONZALEZ , Sergio R. Gonzalez, Rosalinda Gonzalez, Dianna Gonzalez, Appellees

From the 341st Judicial District Court

, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CVH001007D3

Honorable Joel B. Johnson , Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ , AND JUSTICE

VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, this appeal is

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3( b) (allowing appellate courts to dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution when an appellant fails to pay or make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record); see also T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3 (c) (allowing appellate courts to dismiss an appeal when an appellant fails to comply with a court order). Costs of appeal are taxed against appellant.

SIGNED May 24, 2023.

_________________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez , Justice
Skip to main content

# Social Security

Search
Menu
Español
Sign in

## Contribution and Benefit Base Determination
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel; NHLBI CLTR SEP Review.                    

*Date:*                         February 23, 2016.                    

*Time:*                         9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7188, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Chang Sook Kim, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7188, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, 301-435-0287,                         *carolko@mail.nih.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 28, 2016.

Michelle Trout,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2016-01904 Filed 2-2-16; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### ETTA HELMS and FRANK HELMS, Her Husband, v. E. A. COLLINS.

(Filed 19 December, 1930.)

Wills E c — Devisee took fee simple under rale in Shelley’s case after falling in of prior life estate under terms of this will.

A devise to testator’s wife of all his real property with power of disposition over all or a part of the same, and the part not so disposed of to his daughter for her life and at her death to the “heirs of her body” : *HeU,*upon the death of the wife without any disposition of the property the title to the,lands vests in the daughter in fee simple under the rule in *Shelley's case,*the naked power of disposition to the wife not affecting the result.

Appeal by defendant from *McBlroy, J.,*at August Term, 1930, of Union".

Affirmed.

On 15 November, 1929, the plaintiffs and the defendant entered into a written contract for sale by the plaintiffs and purchase by the defendant of three tracts of land at the agreed price of $3,400. The plaintiffs tendered and the defendant declined to accept a deed for the land on the ground that the *feme*plaintiff owns a life estate and not a fee simple.

The parties agreed on the facts, and the trial court adjudged that Etta Helms is the owner in fee and that the defendant should accept the deed at the price agreed.

*W. B. Love and W. II. Booker for plaintiffs.*

*Gilliam. Qraig for defendant.*

*90Per Curiam.

J. *W.*Clontz made a will containing the following item: “I give, devise and bequeath, unto my wife, E. Jane Clontz, all of my real and personal property of every description and wheresoever located so long as she may live, and should she need the proceeds of the same to live on I give her the right to sell a part or all of the same, but that part not sold or used by her during her lifetime I give and devise unto my daughter Louetta Helms for and during her life and at her death to the heirs of her body.”

Jane Clontz did not sell any part of the land devised to her for life. The naked gift of a power of disposition did not convert her life estate into a fee. *Carroll v. Herring,*180 N. C., 369; *Roane v. Robinson,*189 N. C., 628. The remainder “to my daughter Louetta Helms for and during her life and at her death to the heirs of her body” vests in Louetta Helms an estate in fee under the rule in *Shelley’s case. Chamblee v. Broughton,*120 N. C., 171; *Bank v. Dortch,*186 N. C., 510.

Judgment affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 245 (Thursday, December 21, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 66082-66083]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30977]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
26 CFR Parts 1 and 602

[TD 8631]
RIN 1545-AT79


Notice of Significant Reduction in the Rate of Future Benefit 
Accrual; Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Correction to final regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to the final regulations 
(TD 8631) which were published in the Federal Register for Friday, 
December 15, 1995 (60 FR 64320). The final regulations provide guidance 
concerning the requirements of section 204(h) of the Employee 
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA), relating to 
defined benefit plans and to individual account plans that are subject 
to the finding standards of section 302 of ERISA.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 15, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Betty J. Clary (202) 622-6070 (not a 
toll-free number). 

[[Page 66083]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The final regulations that are the subject of this correction are 
under section 411 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Need for Correction

    As published, TD 8631 contains an error which is in need of 
correction.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication to the final regulations which is the 
subject of FR Doc. 95-30416, is corrected as follows:
    On page 64321, column 3, in the preamble, following the paragraph 
heading Effective Dates, line 5, the language ``or after January 2, 
1996.'' is corrected to read ``or after December 30, 1995.''.
Michael Slaughter,
Acting Chief, Regulations Unit, Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate).
[FR Doc. 95-30977 Filed 12-15-95; 3:31 pm]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-U
Exhibit
23.1





Larry
O'Donnell, CPA, P.C.





Telephone
      (303) 745-4545
            2228
      South Fraser StreetFax
      (303) 369-9384
            Unit
      IE-mail
      larryodonnellcpa@msn.com
            Aurora,
      Colorado 80014www.larryodonnellcpa.com





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




I consent
to the use, in the statement of Form 10-K of Ecoland International, Inc. (A
Development State Company) of my report dated December 13, 2009 on the financial
statements of Ecoland International, Inc. (A Development State Company) as of
May 31, 2009 and for the period from inception (May 31, 1997) to May 31, 2009,
and the reference to me under the caption “Experts”.





/s/Larry
      O'Donnell, CPA, P.C.Larry
      O'Donnell, CPA, P.C.December
      17, 2009Aurora,
      Colorado
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 237 (Monday, December 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63507-63508]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30094]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

North American Free Trade Agreement, Article 1904 Binational 
Panel Reviews: Notice of Completion of Panel Review

AGENCY: North American Free Trade Agreement, NAFTA Secretariat, United 
States Section, International Trade Administration, Department of 
Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of completion of panel review of the final determination 
made by the U.S. International Trade Administration, in an affirmative 
countervailing duty administrative review respecting leather wearing 
apparel from Mexico, Secretariat File No. USA-94-1904-02.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Order of the Binational Panel dated October 
20, 1995, affirming the final redetermination on remand described above 
was completed on December 1, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James R. Holbein, United States 
Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat, Suite 2061, 14th and Constitution Avenue, 
Washington, D.C. 20230, (202) 482-5438.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 20, 1995, the Binational Panel 
Issued an Order which affirmed the final affirmative countervailing 
duty administrative review redetermination on remand of the United 
States International Trade Administration (``ITA'') concerning Leather 
wearing Apparel from Mexico. The Secretariat was instructed to issue a 
Notice of 

[[Page 63508]]
Completion of Panel Review on the 31st day following the issuance of 
the Notice of Final Panel Action, if no Request for an Extraordinary 
Challenge was filed. No such request was filed. Therefore, on the basis 
of the Panel Order and Rule 80 of the Article 1904 Panel Rules, the 
Panel Review was completed and the panelists discharged from their 
duties effective December 1, 1995.

    Dated: December 1, 1995.

James R. Holbein,

United States Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat.

[FR Doc. 95-30094 Filed 12-8-95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-GT-M
Exhibit 31.2



Certifications



I, Bryant P. Bynum, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Keystone Automotive Operations, Inc., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Keystone Automotive Operations,
Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or
not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: November 19, 2004



|    |  |                             
|--- |  | ----------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ BRYANT P. BYNUM         
|    |  | Bryant P. Bynum             
|    |  | Executive Vice President and
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer     



25
EX-34.4
(logo) KPMG

KPMG LLP
345 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10154


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


The Board of Directors
Column Financial Inc.:

We have examined management's assessment, included in the accompanying
Management Assessment that Column Financial Inc. ("The Company") complied with
the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)(1)(ii) of the Securities and
Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for publicly issued commercial mortgage
backed securities on or after January 1, 2007 ("The Platform") for which the
company acted as a Pool Asset Administrator, as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2007. Management has determined that all other criteria set forth
in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the Company because the Company does not
perform activities with respect to the Platform relating to those criteria.
Appendix A to Management Assessment identifies the individual asset-backed
transactions and securities defined by management as constituting the Platform.
Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing
criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's
assessment about the Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing
selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform,
testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining
whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those
selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our
procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities
performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our
procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred
either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances
or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by
this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe
that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assessment that the Company complied with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2007, is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ KPMG LLP

New York, New York
March 14, 2008



KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, is the U.S.
member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.
Addendeum to the Salaried Supplemental Benefit Plan



 Exhibit 10.17(i) 
 AMENDMENT TO THE 
 CLEARWATER PAPER CORPORATION 
 SALARIED SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFIT PLAN 
 The Clearwater
Paper Corporation Salaried Supplemental Benefit Plan, as amended and restated as of December 16, 2008 (the “Plan”), is hereby further amended by adding the following new “Addendum B” to the end thereof, effective as of
December 16, 2008: 
 “ADDENDUM B 
 ADDITIONAL BENEFITS PROVIDED TO GORDON JONES 
 Except as provided in this Addendum B, all of the terms and
conditions of the Clearwater Paper Corporation Salaried Supplemental Benefit Plan (the “Plan”) shall apply to any benefit payable under the Plan to Gordon Jones. In accordance with the foregoing, the retirement benefits guaranteed to
Mr. Jones in his employment agreement dated July 28, 2008, will be provided under this Addendum B to the Plan to the extent that such minimum retirement benefits are not provided by any other section of the Plan or under the Clearwater
Paper Salaried Retirement Plan (the “Salaried Retirement Plan”). The relevant provision of Mr. Jones’s employment agreement, from section 7 of that agreement, is reproduced below (references below to the “SpinCo Supplemental
Retirement Plan” are to this Plan, and references below to the “SpinCo Salaried Retirement Plan” and “Retirement Plan” are to the Salaried Retirement Plan): 
 ... the Board will take such action as is necessary to provide you with an additional benefit under the SpinCo Supplemental Retirement Plan which will
make up certain benefits which cannot, by law, be paid to you under the SpinCo Salaried Retirement Plan, to include: (i) any benefit that you have accrued under the Retirement Plan but would otherwise forfeit because you were not fully vested
in such plan at the time you terminated SpinCo employment; and (ii) any benefit that you would have been entitled to under the Retirement Plan had such plan credited, for benefit accrual purposes, all Potlatch service on a retroactive basis.

 For the avoidance of doubt, Mr. Jones’s accrued benefit under the Salaried Retirement Plan includes benefits for all of his service with
Potlatch Corporation retroactive to his commencement of employment with Potlatch Corporation. Consequently, the only additional benefit provided under this Addendum B is the vesting benefit provided by clause (i) in the quoted excerpt
above.” 
  

									
	Date: May 12, 2009	 		 	CLEARWATER PAPER CORPORATION
					
		 		 		 	By:	 	/s/ Thomas H. Carter
		 		 		 	Name:	 	Thomas H. Carter
		 		 		 	Title:	 	Vice President, Human Resources