alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.7


 


FIRST AMENDEDMENT TO MINING OPERATIONS AGREEMENT


 


This First Amendment to Mining Operations Agreement
is made and entered into as of the __ of July, 2022 by and between APPLIED MINERALS INC., a Delaware corporation, having its principal
place of business at 1200 Silver City Road, PO Box 432, Eureka, Utah 84628 ("AMI"), and BMI MINERALS COMPANY ("BMC”),
a Missouri corporation having its principal place of business at 16640 Chesterfield Grove Road, Suite 170, Chesterfield, MO 63005.



 


AMI and BMC may be referred to herein collectively
as the "Parties" or individually as a "Party."


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the amount paid to AMI by BMC as
an Additional Deposit (as the term is defined in the Second Amendment to Iron Sale Agreement), and for good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:


 


This First Amendment to Mining Operations Agreement amends the Mining
Operations Agreement, entered into between the Parties on May 31, 2022.


 


AMI and BMC agree that the Mining Operations Agreement is amended as
follows:


 


		1.	Section 8.12 is added as follows:



 


Section 8.12 Assignment The Mining Operations Agreement
is assignable in whole or in part without the consent of AMI.


 




    	 	 	1



     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed
this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.


 


	APPLIED MINERALS, INC. 	 	BMI MINERALS COMPANY	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	 	 	By:	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Name:	 	 	Name:	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Title:	 	 	Title:	 	 


 




    	 	 	2
OPTION ONE
M O R TG A G E                                  www.optiononemortgage.com
One gets it done.





                       Annual Compliance Certificate


      I, Fabiola Camperi, the undersigned, the duly authorized President of
Option One Mortgage Corporation (as "Servicer"), does hereby certify the
following for the calendar year ending on December 31, 2007:

1.    A review of the activities of the Servicer during the preceding
      calendar year (or portion thereof) and of its performance under the
      Servicing Agreement (as defined in the cover letter) for such period
      has been made under my supervision.

2.    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
      fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all
      material respects throughout such year (or applicable portion thereof),
      except as disclosed on Appendix B. attached.



Certified By:



/s/Fabiola Camperi
------------------------------
Name:  Fabiola Camperi
Title: President
Date:  March 14, 2008


















        6501 Irvine Center Drive Irvine California 92618 (800) 704-0800








                              APPENDIX B



For SEC Regulation AB 1122(d)(4)(iv), loan modifications are required to be
completed in accordance with the transaction agreements and related pool
asset documents. Managements notes instances of conflicting language within
three PSAs where the verbiage first indicates to generally modify loans if in
the best interest of the trust, but later qualifies the allowable interest
rate reduction. Non-compliance within this Regulation AB criterion is a result
of Management's incorrect interpretation of the former guidance taking
precedence.








                                   Cover Letter


March 15, 2008

HSI Asset Securitization Corporation,
452 Fifth Avenue
New York, New York 10018
Attention: Head MBS Principal Finance

Citibank, N.A.,
388 Greenwich, 14th Floor
New York, New York 10013
Attention: Structured Finance Agency and Trust - HSI Asset Securitization
2007-OPT1
INV #567


Enclosed is the required Sarbanes Oxley Certification:

     Re:  Annual officer's certificate delivered pursuant to Section 3.24 of
     that certain Pooling Servicing Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2007
     (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement"), among HSI Asset Securitization
     Corporation, as depositor (the "Depositor"), Option One Mortgage
     Corporation,  as servicer (in such capacity, the "Servicer") and
     originator, CitiMortgage, Inc., as master servicer (the "Master
     Servicer"), Citibank, N.A., as securities administrator (the "Securities
     Administrator"), Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as custodian, OfficeTiger Global
     Real Estate Services Inc., as credit risk


If you have any questions, please contact Elizabeth Nguyen at (949) 727-8226
or email:  Elizabeth.Nguyen@oomc.com



Option One Mortgage Corporation
6501 Irvine Center Drive
Irvine, CA  92618
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

###### [Disaster Declaration #12159 and #12160]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 6.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Tennessee (FEMA-1909-DR), dated 05/04/2010 .

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms, Flooding, Straight-line Winds, and Tornadoes                    

*Incident Period:*                         04/30/2010 and continuing through 05/18/2010.                    

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         05/18/2010.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         07/06/2010.                    

*EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         02/04/2011.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        A Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance,                               ( print page 30871)                            U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the State of Tennessee, dated 05/04/2010 is hereby amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning 04/30/2010 and continuing through 05/18/2010.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2010-13179 Filed 6-1-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Carreker Corporation (theCompany) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending July 31, 2005 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Lisa K. Peterson, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/                                       | LISA  K. PETERSON |   |
|-------------------------------------------|-------------------|--------|
| Lisa K. Peterson, Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

Dated:             September 8, 2005

 

1

----
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3361 

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to modify the definition of 

franchise fee, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 9, 2021 

Mr. MARKEY (for himself, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. SCHUMER, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. 

BLUMENTHAL, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. MERKLEY, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mr. 

VAN HOLLEN, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. MURPHY, Mr. WYDEN, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Ms. WARREN, and Mr. CARDIN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to modify the 

definition of franchise fee, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Community 

5 Television Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MODIFYING THE DEFINITION OF FRANCHISE FEE. 

7 Section 622(g)(1) of the Communications Act of 

8 1934 (47 U.S.C. 542(g)(1)) is amended— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3361 IS

1 (1) by striking ‘‘includes’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘means’’; and 

3 (2) by inserting ‘‘other monetary’’ before ‘‘as4 sessment’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 5, 2021 t0302

Order 

Clerk

March 5, 2021

161731

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 161731

COA: 348561

Manistee CC: 18-004804-FC

CHRISTOPHER RYAN PERSKI,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 28, 2020 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the Manistee County 

Prosecuting Attorney to answer the application for leave to appeal within 28 days after 

the date of this order. 

The application for leave to appeal remains pending.
#### STATE v. DAVID MINTZ and HERBERT ANDREWS.

(Filed 5 October, 1927.)

Appeal by defendants from *Sinclair, J.,*at March Term, 1927, of Onslow. Indictment for larceny of a motor car.

*Attorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.*

*Summersill & Summersill for defendants.*

Pee CuRiAM.

The defendants excepted to the verdict and judgment. The verdict was warranted by the evidence and the judgment is in due form.

No error.
EXHIBIT 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Vitesse
Semiconductor Corporation
Camarillo, California

We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-55466, 333-53463,
333-69631, 333-40822, 333-105156, 333-84660, 333-33918, 333-108230, 333-61576 and 333-40822) of Vitesse
Semiconductor Corporation of our reports dated December 11, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements and schedule, and the effectiveness of Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation's
internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. Our report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting expresses an adverse opinion
on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2009.

/s/
BDO Seidman, LLP

BDO
Seidman, LLP
Los Angeles, California

December 11,
2009

---



QuickLinks
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5725 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the individual health 

insurance mandate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2014 

Mr. JOLLY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

the individual health insurance mandate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Patient Freedom Act 

5 of 2014’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF INDIVIDUAL HEALTH INSURANCE MAN7 DATE. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5000A of the Internal 

9 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

10 the following new subsection: 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5725 IH

1 ‘‘(h) TERMINATION.—This section shall not apply 

2 with respect to any month beginning after December 31, 

3 2013.’’. 

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

5 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years ending after 

6 December 31, 2013. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report of Casey Container, Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Martin R Nason,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Martin R Nason
----------------------------------
Martin R Nason
Chief Financial Officer
March 29, 2013

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Order entered October 2 9 , 2019

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 01061

- CV

IN RE K&L AUTO CRUSHERS, LLC AND THOMAS GOTHA RD, JR., R elators

Original Proceeding fro m the 160th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 18

- 07502



### O RDER

Before Justices Whitehill, P a rtida

- Kipness, and Pedersen, III

Opinion by Justice Pedersen, III

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relators’ p etition for writ of

mandamus

. We DENY AS MOOT relators’ September 27, 2019 motion for temporary relief

.

/Bill Pedersen, III/

BILL PEDERSEN

, III

JUSTICE
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.16
 
                               AMENDMENT NUMBER 1
                           TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT OF
                                WILLIAM E. WATTS
 
     Amendment Number 1, dated as of January 23, 1998 to Employment Agreement,
dated as of June 16, 1997 as previously amended (the "Employment Agreement"),
between General Nutrition, Incorporated (the "Company") and William E. Watts
("Executive"). Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the
meanings assigned to them in the Employment Agreement.
 
     WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the
Company by unanimous consent, approved an amendment of Executive's Employment
Agreement.
 
     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of Executive's continued performance of
his duties as an officer of the Company, the Company and Executive hereby agree
that:
 
     1. The Employment Period is hereby extended until February 1, 2002. All
references to February 3, 2001 in the Employment Agreement, are hereby changed
to references to February 1, 2002.
 
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of
the date first written above.
 
<TABLE>
<S>                                                <C>
EXECUTIVE                                          GENERAL NUTRITION, INCORPORATED

By: /s/ WILLIAM E. WATTS                           By: /s/ JAMES M. SANDER
--------------------------------------------       -------------------------------------------
    William E. Watts
 
                                                   Title: Vice President
 
Date:  2/3/98                                      Date:  2/3/98
 
Witness: /s/ ANN LANGERHOLC                        Witness: /s/ CHRISTINE M. RUGGIERO
--------------------------------------------       -------------------------------------------
 
GENERAL NUTRITION COMPANIES, INC.
  COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
 
By: /s/ THOMAS R. SHEPHERD
--------------------------------------------
    Thomas R. Shepherd
 
By: /s/ DAVID LUCAS
--------------------------------------------
    David Lucas
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 246 (Friday, December 22, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 66553]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31195]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration


Grassroots Regulatory Partnership Meeting; Southwest Region; 
Importing Commodities

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of a public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (Office of Regulatory 
Affairs, Office of the Southwest Region, and Office of External 
Affairs) is announcing a free public meeting to discuss ways FDA could 
regulate imported commodities more efficiently, improve levels of 
communication with industries and individuals associated with the 
importation of FDA-regulated commodities, and provide improved levels 
of consumer protection in connection with imported commodities being 
shipped into the United States across the United States-Mexico border. 
This meeting is intended to identify and evaluate opportunities for 
implementing the President's initiative for a partnership approach 
between the agency and the people affected by the work of this agency.

DATES: The public meeting will be held on Wednesday, January 31, 1996, 
from 9 a.m. to 12 m.

ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be held at the Concourse Clarion 
Hotel, Oxford Room A and B, 6789 Boeing, El Paso, TX 79926.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara A. Cain, Food and Drug 
Administration, 300 East Eight St., rm. B123, Austin, TX 78701, 512-
482-5736, or Robert G. Rast, Food and Drug Administration, 9777 Via De 
La Amistad, rm. 128, San Diego, CA 92173, 619-661-3273.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: There is no registration fee for this 
meeting. However, due to space limitations, early registration is 
recommended. This meeting is intended to assist importers, brokers, and 
others associated with a wide variety of products being shipped through 
the southwest and west coast (FDA Southwest and Pacific Regions).

    Dated: December 15, 1995.
William K. Hubbard,
Associate Commissioner for Policy Coordination.
[FR Doc. 95-31195 Filed 12-21-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
#### J.H. Electric of New York, Inc., Appellant, v New York City Housing Authority, Respondent.

[773 NYS2d 391]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Marilyn Shafer, J.), entered September 5, 2002, which denied plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment and granted defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The contract, when read as a whole, required plaintiff to purchase and furnish the radio system in order to complete the *192work in accordance with the terms. The specifications called for installation of the radio system, delineating the products required, and further provided that the requirement to furnish all labor and materials applied to this installation. The contract explicitly provided that where equipment was included in the contract drawings, as it was here, it is also deemed included in the specifications.

Inasmuch as the radio system was not included in the list of products that defendant was to provide, and the contract provided that plaintiff was to “locate” the radio system in accordance with the drawings, there was, at best, a latent ambiguity as to whether plaintiff was responsible for purchasing the radio system. Plaintiffs failure to seek clarification of this provision before submitting its bid meant that it would be held to defendant’s reasonable interpretation of the term *(see Cipico Constr. v City of New York,*279 AD2d 416 [2001]).

With regard to plaintiffs claim to recover costs for grounding wire for the generator, the specifications indicated that installation of such wire was necessary for the system to be compliant with the National and New York City Electrical Codes. Thus, plaintiff had to perform grounding work in order to be code compliant, as required by the contract, and is not entitled to additional compensation. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Williams, Lerner and Marlow, JJ.
#### Mary Cullen, as Administratrix, etc., Appellant, v. President, etc., of The Delaware and Hudson Canal Company, Respondent.

Judgment reversed, new trial granted, costs to abide the event.

Opinion by

Learned, P. J.;

Bocires, J., not sitting.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 243 (Tuesday, December 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 65324]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30696]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[Report No. 2115]


Petition for Reconsideration of Actions in Rulemaking Proceedings

December 13, 1995.
    Petition for reconsideration have been filed in the Commission 
rulemaking proceedings listed in this Public Notice and published 
pursuant to 47 CFR Section 1.429(e). The full text of these documents 
are available for viewing and copying in Room 239, 1919 M Street NW., 
Washington, DC or may be purchased from the Commission's copy 
contractor ITS, Inc. (202) 857-3800. Opposition to this petition must 
be filed January 3, 1996. See Section 1.4(b)(1) of the Commission's 
rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition must be filed within 
10 days after the time for filing oppositions has expired.

Subject: Amendment of Parts 2 and 90 of the Commission's Rules to 
Provide for the use of 200 Channels Outside the Designated Filing Area 
in the 896-901 MHz and the 935-940 MHz Bands Allotted to the 
Specialized Mobile Radio Pool (PR Docket No. 89-553).
    Implementation of Sections 3(n) and 332 of the Communications Act 
(GN Docket No. 93-252).
    Number of Petitions Filed: 2.
Subject: Amendment of Section 73.202(b), Table of Allotments, FM 
Broadcast Stations. (Rosendale, New York) (MM Docket No. 93-17, RM-
8170).
    Number of Petitions Filed: 1.
Subject: Petition for Computer III Waiver (CC Docket No. 90-623).
    Number of Petitions Filed: 1.

Federal Communications Commision.
William F. Caton,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-30696 Filed 12-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M