alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|Number | Date           | Title                                                                                                                 | Author(s)                             
|------ | -------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------
|142    | January 1999   | Social Security Trust Fund Investment Policies
      and Practices   (PDF)                                            | J. L. Kunkel                          
|141    | January 1999   | The Widow(er)'s Indexing Computation (WINDEX)
        (PDF)                                                           | C. Chaplain                           
|140    | January 1999   | A Matched-Records Study of AIDS Deaths in 1993: 
     SSA Administrative Records and Death Certificates 
       (PDF) | B. M. Kestenbaum and C. Chaplain      
|139    | June 1998      | Name Distributions in the 
      Social Security Area, August 1997   (PDF)                                            | M. W. Shackleford                     
|138    | October 1997   | Effective Annual Interest Rates Earned by the 
     OASI and DI Trust Funds, 1940-96   (PDF)                          | J. L. Kunkel                          
|137    | November 1996  | OASDI Short-Range Sensitivity Analysis
        (PDF)                                                                  | N. J. Barrick                         
|136    | October 1996   | Representative Payees for Adult Beneficiaries, 
      October 1994   (PDF)                                            | B. M. Kestenbaum and M. W. Shackleford
|135    | July 1996      | Frequency Distribution of Wage Earners by 
      Wage Level   (PDF)                                                   | J. L. Kunkel                          
|134    | June 1996      | Suitability of Beneficiary Records for Determining
      the Program Experience of Couples   (PDF)                    | B. M. Kestenbaum                      
|133    | September 1992 | Average Wages for 1985-1990 for Indexing Under the
      Social Security Act   (PDF)                                  | M. D. Clingman and J. L. Kunkel       
|132    | June 1990      | A Simple Evaluation of Projections in OASDI Trustees Reports                                                          | F. R. Bayo
#### JOHN MARTIN v. R. E. CAPEL.

(Filed 29 November, 1950.)

1. Appeal and Error § 24—

Assignments of error not supported by exceptions are ineffective.

2. Appeal and Error § 6c (2) —

An exception to tbe signing of the judgment presents only whether error appears on the face of the record.

Johnson, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Appeal by defendant from *Phillips, J.,*at June Term, 1950, of ANSON.

Civil action by tenant to recover of landlord bis portion of 1948 crops ■cultivated under “share-cropper” agreement.

There was a consent reference in tbe case to state tbe landlord-tenant account, which resulted in an award to tbe plaintiff of $340.31 with interest as prayed in tbe complaint.

Exceptions-were duly filed to tbe referee’s report by defendant which came on for bearing at tbe June Term, 1950, Anson Superior Court. Tbe exceptions were overruled, “tbe same being separately considered,” and tbe report of tbe referee was adopted and approved.

From tbe judgment entered, tbe defendant appeals.

*734*Enos T. Edwards for plaintiff, appellee.*

*Taylor, Kitchin <& Taylor for defendant, appellant.*

Per Curiam.

The only exception appearing on tbe record is “To the signing of the judgment,” which is also' assigned as error. There are' eleven other assignments of error, following the case on appeal, but these are non-exceptive. Hence, the only question presented is whether error appears on the face of the record. *Terry v. Capital Ice & Coal Co.,*231 N.C. 103, 55 S.E. 2d 926. We find none.

Judgment affirmed.

JohnsoN, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**SECTION906 CERTIFICATION**

 

The undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in hiscapacity as an officer of Allegiance Telecom, Inc. (the “Company”), that,to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended September 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
|                          |   | /s/ ROYCE J. HOLLAND                          |
|-------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                          |   | Name: Royce J. Holland                        |
| Dated: November 19, 2003 | By:    | Title: *Chairman and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

1

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6245

THOMAS REID DECARLO,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL; NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION; TILLERY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; J. WILLIAMS,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief

District Judge. (CA-97-1139-1)

Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 6, 1998

Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Reid DeCarlo, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Reid DeCarlo seeks to appeal the district court's order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. DeCarlo v. North Carolina Attorney General, No.

CA-97-1139-1 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 28, 1998). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.2

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Annual  Report (the  "Report") on the Form 10-K of Siga
Resources,  Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended July 31, 2010, as filed with
the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof,  I, Robert Malasek
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary Treasurer and Director,  certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13 (a) or
          15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in this Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.

Date: February 9, 2011


/s/ Robert Malasek
-------------------------------------
Robert Malasek
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary
Treasurer and Director
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 108 (Monday, June 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 32163]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13547]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Federal Advisory Committee; Department of Defense Wage Committee

ACTION: Notice of closed meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of section 10 of Public Law 92-463, 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is hereby given that a 
closed meeting of the Department of Defense Wage Committee will be held 
on June 29, 2010, in Rosslyn, Virginia.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Tuesday, June 29, 2010, at 10 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at 1400 Key Boulevard, Level A, 
Room A101, Rosslyn, VA 22209.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Additional information concerning the 
meeting may be obtained by writing to the Chairman, Department of 
Defense Wage Committee, 4000 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-
4000.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the provisions of section 10(d) of 
Public Law 92-463, the Department of Defense has determined that the 
meeting meets the criteria to close meetings to the public because the 
matters to be considered are related to internal rules and practices of 
the Department of Defense and the detailed wage data to be considered 
were obtained from officials of private establishments with a guarantee 
that the data will be held in confidence.
    However, members of the public who may wish to do so are invited to 
submit material in writing to the chairman concerning matters believed 
to be deserving of the Committee's attention.

    Dated: June 2, 2010.
Mitchell S. Bryman,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2010-13547 Filed 6-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
Second Amendment to Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 THIS SECOND AMENDMENT (the “Amendment”)
is made and entered into as of June 10, 2009, by and between Edgewater Technology, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and Dave Gallo (“Employee”). 
 RECITALS 
 WHEREAS, the Company and Employee entered into an Employment
Agreement dated June 12, 2007 (“Employment Agreement”) pursuant to which the Employee is employed by the Company as the Chief Operating Officer; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company and Employee now desire to extend the term of the Employment Agreement for an additional period of one (1) year. 
 AGREEMENT 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and
agreements contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
 1. Section 1 of the
Employment Agreement shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 
 TERM OF AGREEMENT. The term of this
Agreement shall commence on the date hereof and shall continue until June 16, 2010, unless terminated sooner in accordance with Sections 5 or 6 hereof (the “Term”). During the Term, the calendar year shall be referred to herein as a
“Compensation Year,” which in addition to the full calendar years covered in the Term, for purposes of any incentive compensation plans of the type referenced in Sections 3.3, shall include the period of January 1, 2009 through the
date of this Agreement and the balance of the 2009 year following the date of this Agreement and for the 2010 year, shall include the balance of the 2010 year following the expiration of the Term through December 31, 2010. 
 2. Except as expressly amended herein, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, unaltered and unaffected by this Amendment.

 3. This Amendment shall in all respects be construed according to the laws of the State of Delaware. 
 4. This Amendment shall inure to the benefit of and be binding in all respects upon the parties hereto and the respective successors and permitted
assigns. 
 5. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which will be an original and all of which together shall constitute
one and the same instrument. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has executed this Amendment in multiple counterparts as
of the day and year first above written. 
  

	
	EMPLOYEE:
	
	 /s/ Dave Gallo

	Dave Gallo
	
	EDGEWATER TECHNOLOGY, INC.:
	
	 /s/ Shirley Singleton

	Shirley Singleton
	Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer


  

 29
Skip to main content

# Social Security

Search
Menu
Español
Sign in

## Primary Insurance Amount
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Meditecnic, Inc. (the "Company") on Form  10-QSB for the quarter  ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof  (the "Report"),  I, Bernard Arbalet, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Bernard Arbalet

By: Bernard Arbalet

Chief Executive  Officer

December 4, 2008
#### STATE v. C. N. RICHARDSON.

(Filed 14 October, 1925.)

Appeal by defendant from *Daniels, J.,*at May Term, 1925, of Wake.

Criminal prosecution tried upon an indictment charging tbe defendant witb violating tbe provisions of C. S., 4358, against prostitution, aiding and abetting therein, and operating a place or building for such purposes.

From an adverse verdict and judgment of 20 months on tbe roads, tbe defendant appeals, assigning errors.

*Attorney-General Brumm/itt and, Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.*

*F. T. Bennett for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

Tbe evidence is conflicting on tbe issue of guilt; it is purely a question of fact; tbe jury has determined tbe matter against tbe defendant; there is no reversible error appearing on tbe record; tbe exceptions relating to tbe alleged insufficiency of tbe evidence, and tbe one to tbe charge, must be resolved in favor of tbe validity of tbe trial; tbe verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002



The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of SAVVIS
Communications Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



|(a) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |     |  |                         
|----------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------
|Date: May 5, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Jeffrey H. VonDeylen
|                  |  |     |  | Jeffrey H. VonDeylen    
|                  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOTICE PARTIES

PG&E Corporation

c/o Pacific Gas & Electric Company

Attn: Janet Loduca, Esq.

77 Beale Street

P.O. Box 770000

San Francisco, CA 94105

Keller & Benvenutti LLP

Attn: Tobias S. Keller, Esq.

Jane Kim, Esq.

650 California Street, Suite 1900

San Francisco, CA 94108

The Office of the United States Trustee for Region 17

Attn: James L. Snyder, Esq.

Timothy Laffredi, Esq.

450 Golden Gate Avenue, 5th Floor, Suite #05-0153

San Francisco, CA 94102

Milbank LLP

Attn: Dennis F. Dunne, Esq.

Sam A. Khalil, Esq.

55 Hudson Yards

New York, NY 10001-2163

Milbank LLP

Attn: Paul S. Aronzon, Esq.

Gregory A. Bray, Esq.

Thomas R. Kreller, Esq.

2029 Century Park East, 33rd Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90067

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP

Attn: Stephen Karotkin, Esq.

 Jessica Liou, Esq.

 Matthew Goren, Esq.

767 Fifth Avenue

New York, NY 10153-0119 

Bruce A. Markell

Fee Examiner

541 N. Fairbanks Court

Suite 2200

Chicago, IL 60611-3710

Scott H. McNutt

Attorney for the Fee Examiner

324 Warren Road

San Mateo, CA 94402

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3995-6 Filed: 09/24/19 Entered: 09/24/19 17:25:35 Page 1

of 1
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuantto**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Inconnection with the quarterly report of Northwest Airlines Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, DavidM. Davis, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date:November 9, 2007

 
| /s/  David M. Davis           |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
| David  M. Davis               |
| Executive  Vice President and |
| Chief  Financial Officer      |

 

Thiscertification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to theextent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “ExchangeAct”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by referenceinto any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the ExchangeAct, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it byreference.

 

----
#### John W. Harper v. William H. Williams and others.

Motion denied.

Opinion by

Pratt, J,;

Barnard, P. J., dissenting.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5561 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5561

 To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 
to designate high priority corridors on the National Highway System in 
          the State of North Carolina, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 18, 2014

 Mr. Butterfield (for himself and Mr. Jones) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 
to designate high priority corridors on the National Highway System in 
          the State of North Carolina, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military Corridor Transportation 
Improvement Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. HIGH PRIORITY CORRIDORS ON NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM.

    (a) In General.--Section 1105(c) of the Intermodal Surface 
Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 2032) is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
            ``(81) United States Route 117/Interstate Route 795 from 
        United States Route 70 in Goldsboro, Wayne County, North 
        Carolina, to Interstate Route 40 west of Faison, Sampson 
        County, North Carolina.
            ``(82) United States Route 70 from its intersection with 
        Interstate Route 40 in Garner, Wake County, North Carolina, to 
        the Port at Morehead City, Carteret County, North Carolina.''.
    (b) Inclusion of Certain Route Segments on Interstate System.--
Section 1105(e)(5)(A) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation 
Efficiency Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 2031; 109 Stat. 597; 115 Stat. 872; 
118 Stat. 293; 126 Stat. 426) is amended in the first sentence by 
striking ``and subsection (c)(57)'' and inserting ``subsection (c)(57), 
subsection (c)(81), and subsection (c)(82)''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to

to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of SAVVIS, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



|(a) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |     |  |                          
|----------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------
|Date: May 5, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Jeffrey H. Von Deylen
|                  |  |     |  | Jeffrey H. Von Deylen    
|                  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### Conrad Loos and others, Respondents, v. J. Foreman Wilkinson and others, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs against appellants personally. Opinion by

Follett, J.