alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 243 (Tuesday, December 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 65351]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30816]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Health Resources and Services Administration


Advisory Council; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following 
National Advisory body scheduled to meet during the month of January 
1996.

    Name: Council on Graduate Medical Education
    Date and Time: January 9, 1996, 1:00 p.m.-5:00 p.m., January 10, 
1996, 8:30 a.m.-4:00 p.m.
    Place: Governor's House Hotel, 17th Street at Rhode Island 
Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036

    The meeting is open to the public.

    Purpose: Provides advice and recommendations to the Secretary 
and to the Committees on Labor and Human Resources, and Finance of 
the Senate and the Committees on Energy and Commerce and Ways and 
Means of the House of Representatives, with respect to (A) the 
supply and distribution of physicians in the United States; (B) 
current and future shortages of physicians in medical and surgical 
specialties and subspecialties; (C) issues relating to international 
medical graduates; (D) appropriate Federal policies regarding (A), 
(B), and (C) above; (E) appropriate efforts to be carried out by 
medical and osteopathic schools, public and private hospitals and 
accrediting bodies regarding matters in (A), (B), and (C) above; (F) 
deficiencies in the needs for improvements in, existing data bases 
concerning supply and distribution of, and training programs for 
physicians in the United States.
    Agenda: The Agenda will include a panel to discuss International 
Medical Graduates, entry and participation in the U.S. physician 
workforce. A panel to discuss Legislation and GME Reform, House Ways 
and Means Committee. Report on transition funding issues; Report and 
updates on the work groups, Minorities in Medicine; Geographic 
Distribution/Medical Education Consortia; Physician Competencies in 
a Managed Care World; and IMG Entry and Participation in the 
Physician Workforce.

    Anyone requiring information regarding the meeting should contact 
F. Lawrence Clare, M.D., M.P.H., Deputy Executive Secretary, Telephone 
301-443-6326, Council on Graduate Medical Education, Division of 
Medicine, Bureau of Health Professions, Room 9A-27, Parklawn Building, 
5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857.
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.

    Dated: December 12, 1996.
Jackie E. Baum,
Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-30816 Filed 12-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-15-P
Cite as 2016 Ark. App. 555



## ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION III No. E-16-146 LOBINA CONSTRUCTION APPELLANT

V. DARYL BASSETT, DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE SERVICES, and JOE MARTINEZ APPELLEES Opinion Delivered November 16, 2016

APPEAL FROM THE ARKANSAS BOARD OF REVIEW [NO. 2016-BR-00218]

AFFIRMED

PHILLIP T. WHITEAKER, Judge Lobina Construction appeals from a decision of the Arkansas Board of Review (Board), which concluded that Lobina Construction had discharged the claimant, Joe Martinez, for reasons other than misconduct in connection with the work and awarded Martinez benefits. The only issue on appeal is whether there was sufficient evidence to support the Board’s finding. We affirm. The standard of review to be followed in such cases is clear: We do not conduct a de novo review in appeals from the Board of Review. In appeals of unemployment compensation cases we instead review the evidence and all reasonable inferences deducible therefrom in the light most favorable to the Board of Review’s findings. The findings of fact made by the Board of Review are conclusive if supported by substantial evidence; even when there is evidence upon which the Board might have reached a different decision, the scope of judicial review is limited to a determination of whether the Board could have reasonably reached its decision based on the evidence before it. Substantial evidence is such evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.Cite as 2016 Ark. App. 555

Barnard v. Dir. , 2013 Ark. App. 143, at 2 (quoting Valentine v. Dir. , 2012 Ark. App. 612, at 3). It is also clear that the credibility of the witnesses and the weight to be accorded their testimony are matters to be resolved by the Board of Review, Barnard, supra ; like a jury, an administrative body is free to believe or disbelieve the testimony of any witness. Gunter v. Dir. , 82 Ark. App. 346, 107 S.W.3d 902 (2003). Here, the only issue presented is the sufficiency of the evidence. From our review of the record, we conclude that the Board’s findings are supported by substantial evidence. Therefore, we affirm the Board’s decision by this memorandum opinion pursuant to section (a) of In re Memorandum Opinions , 16 Ark. App. 301, 700 S.W.2d 63 (1985). Affirmed. V IRDENand G LOVER , JJ., agree. Rush & Rush , by: Patrick F. Flake , for appellant. Phyllis A. Edwards , for appellee.

2
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members         
    -  AEE Multimedia 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# PHOTOS ANDVIDEOS

Search

Search

                                - All Images 
                                - Other 
                                - Space Shuttle 

                                - Upload Date
                                - Photo Date
                                - Title

----

Download Image: Full Size (0.45 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*John J. Donovan, Appellant, v. The Same, Respondents.

Order quashing writ affirmed, with costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Dykman, J.;

Pratt, J., not sitting.
COUNTRYWIDE
                                                     -----------
                                                     HOME LOANS

                                                  400 Countrywide Way
February 29, 2008                           Simi Valley, California 93065-6298



Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust, Inc.
Attn: John Hannon
388 Greenwich Street, 14th Floor
New York, NY 10013


                         Officer's Certificate

I, Joseph Candelario, hereby certify that I am an officer of Countrywide GP,
Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP (the "servicer").
I further certify, with respect to the applicable servicing agreement relating
to the securitization transactions(s) set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto
(the "Servicing Agreement") that:

     (a) A review of the activities of the Servicer during the preceding
     calendar year and of the performance of the Servicer under the
     Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision: and

     (b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
     fulfilled all of its obligation under the Servicing Agreement in all
     material respects throughout such year.





/s/ Joseph Candelario               February 29, 2008
------------------------            ------------------
Joseph Candelario
First Vice President
Compliance Officer
Loan Administration






Exhibit A - Securitized Transaction(s)
Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust, Inc. - 388 Greenwich Street, 14th Floor


CMLTI 2007-10
CMLTI 2007-6
CMLTI 2007-AHL2
CMLTI 2007-AHL3
CMLTI 2007-AMC1
CMLTI 2007-AMC2
CMLTI 2007-AR1
CMLTI 2007-AR4
CMLTI 2007-AR7
CMLTI 2007-AR8
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members         
    -  AEE Multimedia 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# PHOTOS ANDVIDEOS

Search

Search

                                - All Images 
                                - Other 
                                - Space Shuttle 

                                - Upload Date
                                - Photo Date
                                - Title

----

Download Image: Full Size (0.21 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 241 (Friday, December 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 64423]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30588]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Office of Arms Control and Nonproliferation Policy


Proposed Subsequent Arrangement

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Subsequent arrangement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 131 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 
amended (42 U.S.C. 2160), notice is hereby given of a proposed 
``subsequent arrangement'' under the Additional Agreement for 
Cooperation between the Government of the United States of America and 
the European Atomic Energy Community (EURATOM) concerning Peaceful Uses 
of Atomic Energy, as amended, and the Agreement for Cooperation between 
the Government of the United States of America and the Government of 
Japan concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy.
    The subsequent arrangement to be carried out under the above-
mentioned agreements involves approval of the following retransfer: 
RTD/JA(EU)-77, for the transfer of 14 grams of uranium containing 0.588 
grams of the isotope uranium-235 (4.2 percent enrichment) and 8.5 grams 
of uranium containing 0.357 grams of the isotope uranium-235 (4.2 
percent enrichment) from EURATOM to Japan for use in calibration of 
mass spectrometers.
    In accordance with Section 131 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 
amended, it has been determined that this subsequent arrangement will 
not be inimical to the common defense and security.
    This subsequent arrangement will take effect no sooner that fifteen 
days after the date of publication of this notice.
Edward T. Fei,
Deputy Director, International Policy and Analysis Division, Office of 
Arms Control and Nonproliferation.
[FR Doc. 95-30588 Filed 12-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

This
certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K (the "Form 10-K")
for the year ended December 31, 2008 of Manhattan Bancorp (the "Company").

I,
Dean Fletcher, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that, to the best of my knowledge:



Date:
March 26, 2009

/s/ DEAN FLETCHER Dean Fletcher Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1900-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2010-0002]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Minnesota (FEMA-1900-DR), dated April 19, 2010, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         May 28, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Minnesota is hereby amended to include the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of April 19, 2010.

Grant County for Public Assistance.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2010-13716 Filed 6-7-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-23-P
#### Wilbur S. Peck and others v. Isaac P. Powers.

Motion denied.
The Honorable Joseph M. Hood, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District *

of Kentucky, sitting by designation.

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 08a0216n.06

Filed: April 23, 2008

No. 07-4101

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

DIANA CARTER, 

Plaintiff, Appellant

On Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Northern District of Ohio

v.

FIRST ENERGY NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANY,

Defendant, Appellee

______________________________/

BEFORE: KENNEDY, MARTIN, Circuit Judges, and HOOD, District Judge.*

PER CURIAM. Plaintiff-Appellant Diana Carter appeals the district court’s grant of

summary judgment to Defendant-Appellee First Energy Nuclear Operating Company on her

claims of failure to reasonably accommodate her alleged disability under the Americans with

Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12001, et seq., and the Ohio Civil Rights Act (“OCRA”),

Revised Code Chapter 4112, and her claim of retaliation under the Family and Medical Leave

Act (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. § 2601, et seq. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant failed to reasonably

accommodate her claimed disability and retaliated against her by placing her on short-term

medical leave with full pay and benefits, rather than continuing the accommodation of her

choosing. The district court granted summary judgment to Defendant because Plaintiff could not

establish that she had suffered an adverse employment action, a required element of both her
2

discrimination and retaliation claims, and Defendant reasonably accommodated Plaintiff’s

claimed disability by placing her on paid short-term leave.

We have carefully read the parties’ briefs, the applicable law, and the district court’s

opinion, and we agree no genuine issues of material fact exist and Defendant is entitled to

judgment as a matter of law on each of Plaintiff’s claims. Because the district court’s decision is

well-reasoned, we see no reason to embellish upon its opinion. Therefore, we AFFIRM the

district court's grant of summary judgment to Defendant on Plaintiff’s ADA, OCRA, and FMLA

claims for the reasons stated in the district court’s opinion.
NOTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ RETURN MAIL, INC., Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant

- Appellee

______________________

2022

- 1898

______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:11

- cv

- 00130

- CFL, Senior Judge Charles F. Lettow.

______________________
JUDGMENT

______________________
A LFRED R OSS F ABRICANT , Fabricant LLP, Rye, NY, argued for plaintiff

- appellant. Also represented by P ETER L AMBRIANAKOS , J OSEPH M. M ERCADANTE , V INCENT J. R UBINO , III

.

S HAHAR H AREL , Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Depar tment of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant

- appellee. Also represented by B RIAN M. B OYNTON , G ARY L EE H AUSKEN , R ACHEL H ICKS ; R EBECCA H ARKER D UTTRY , United States Postal Service, Washington, DC. Case: 22-1898 Document: 45 Page: 1 Filed: 02/13/2024______________________

TH IS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (P ROST , T ARANTO , and C HEN , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

February 13, 2024 Date Case: 22-1898 Document: 45 Page: 2 Filed: 02/13/2024
#### CITY OF WILMINGTON v. THOMAS H. WRIGHT.

(Filed 29 November, 1950.)

Appeal and Error § 40f—

Denial of motion to strike certain portions of complaint upheld upon authority of *Buchanan v. Dickerson, Inc., ante,*421.

Johnson, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Appeal by defendant from *Grady, Emergency Judge,*September Term, 1950, of New Hanovbb.

This action was instituted by the plaintiff to recover damages, alleged by it to have been sustained by reason of the negligence of the defendant, his agents, servants and employees, by causing spoil from a dredging operation to be placed on and upon one of its sanitary sewer lines to such ah extent and in such a manner as to damage and destroy the line.

The defendant in apt time moved to strike certain portions of the complaint. The motion was denied. The defendant excepted and appealed.

*Wm. B. Campbell for plaintiff.*

*Robert D. Cronly, Jr., and Varser, McIntyre & Henry for defendant.*

•Pee Cue-iam.

"We concur in his Honor’s ruling on the motion to strike. It is supported by our recent decisions. *Buchanan v. Dickerson, Inc.,*232 N.C. 421, 61 S.E. 2d 187; *Hinson v. Britt,*232 N.C. 379, 61 S.E. 2d 185; *Parker v. Duke University,*230 N.C. 656, 55 S.E. 2d 189.

The judgment is

Affirmed.

JohNSon, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
#### STATE v. JOE LEE BRIDGERS.

(Filed 25 November, 1953.)

Criminal Law § 81b—

The burden is on defendant not only to show error but also that the error complained of affected the result adversely to him.

Appeal by defendant from *Paul, Special Judge,*September Term, 1953, of GastoN. No error.

*678
      *Attorney-General McMullan, Assistant Attorney-General Moody, and Max 0. Cogburn, Member of Staff, for the State.*

*Ernest R. Warren for defendant, appellant.*

Per Curiam.

Tbe bill of indictment charged the defendant with assault upon the person of the State’s witness with a deadly weapon with intent to kill, inflicting serious injury not resulting in death, in violation of G-.S. 14-32. There was verdict of guilty of assault with deadly weapon with intent to injure, and judgment was rendered imposing sentence of 18 months in jail to be assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highway. & Public Works Commission.

The case on appeal was settled by agreement of counsel, and none^of the evidence in the case was set out in the record. Only the charge of the court was sent up, with certain exceptions noted thereto assigned as error.

While it would seem that failure to comply with Rule 19 (4) might work a dismissal, we have examined the exceptions to the charge and conclude that prejudicial error is not made to appear. The burden was on the defendant not only to show error but also that the error complained of affected the result adversely to him. This he has failed to do.

No error.