alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1925
JUDITH E. CALDWELL, M.D., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SOUTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-95-3260-3-19BC) Submitted: November 21, 1996 Decided: December 3, 1996 Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Judith E. Caldwell, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court's order denying her motion for reconsideration of the denial of relief on her 42 U.S.C.§ 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Caldwell v. South Carolina State Board of Medical Examiners , No. CA-95-3260-3-19BC (D.S.C. June 14, 1996). Further, we deny her motion to transfer to an appropriate venue. We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### William T. Walton and others, Respondents, v. The Agricultural Insurance Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs.

Opinion by

Pratt, J.;

Barnard, P. J., not sitting.
IB 

Union Calendar No. 471 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5050 

[Report No. 113–631] 

To repeal the Act of May 31, 1918, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 9, 2014 

Mr. SIMPSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

DECEMBER 1, 2014 

Additional sponsor: Ms. MCCOLLUM

DECEMBER 1, 2014 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5050 RH

A BILL 

To repeal the Act of May 31, 1918, and for other purposes. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5050 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘May 31, 1918 Act Re5 peal Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 

8 (1) 1918 ACT.—The term ‘‘1918 Act’’ means 

9 the Act of May 31, 1918 (40 Stat. 592, chapter 88). 

10 (2) FORT HALL TOWNSITE.—The term ‘‘Fort 

11 Hall Townsite’’ means the land that was taken out 

12 of trust by being set aside or set apart under the 

13 1918 Act on the Fort Hall Reservation, consisting of 

14 approximately 120 acres in the East Half of the 

15 Northeast Quarter in Section 35 and the West Half 

16 of the West Half of the Northwest Quarter in Sec17 tion 36, Township 4 South, Range 34 East, Boise 

18 Meridian, Idaho, based upon a survey completed on 

19 May 19, 1921, and depicted on the document enti20 tled ‘‘Plat of the Townsite of Fort Hall’’ on file with 

21 Bingham County, Idaho and the Tribes. 

22 (3) TRIBES.—The term ‘‘Tribes’’ means the 

23 Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reserva24 tion. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
4 

•HR 5050 RH

1 SEC. 3. REPEAL. 

2 The 1918 Act is repealed. 

3 SEC. 4. RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Tribes shall have the exclu5 sive right of first refusal to purchase at fair market value 

6 any land— 

7 (1) within the Fort Hall Townsite; and 

8 (2) offered for sale. 

9 (b) ACQUIRED LAND HELD IN TRUST.—The United 

10 States shall hold in trust for the benefit of the Tribes or 

11 a member of the Tribes, as applicable— 

12 (1) any land owned or acquired by the Tribes 

13 or a member of the Tribes within the Fort Hall 

14 Townsite before the date of enactment of this Act; 

15 and 

16 (2) any land owned or acquired by the Tribes 

17 or a member of the Tribes within the Fort Hall 

18 Townsite on or after the date of enactment of this 

19 Act. 

20 SEC. 5. EFFECT. 

21 Nothing in this Act affects any valid right to any land 

22 set aside or set apart under the 1918 Act. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 471 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5050 

[Report No. 113–631] 

A BILL 

To repeal the Act of May 31, 1918, and for other 

purposes. 

DECEMBER 1, 2014 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of SAVVIS, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



|(a) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |     |  |                                            
|----------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------
|Date: May 6, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/ Gregory W. Freiberg                    
|                  |  |     |  | Gregory W. Freiberg Chief
Financial Officer



37
Exhibit 31(ii)
                                 --------------


                                 CERTIFICATIONS

      I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

            1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
                10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by
                this report on Form 10-K of CWHEQ Revolving Home Equity Loan
                Trust, Series 2007-A (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

            2.  Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken
                as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material
                fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
                statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
                statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
                covered by this report;

            3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and
                other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for
                the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange
                Act periodic reports;

            4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
                servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance
                review(s) conducted in preparing the servicer compliance
                statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of
                Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act
                periodic reports, the servicer(s) have fulfilled their
                obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material
                respects; and

            5.  All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
                criteria for asset-backed securities and their related
                attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
                criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in
                this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
                Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an
                exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this
                report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in
                such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

            In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
            information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
            The Bank of New York, as Trustee.

            Date: March 27, 2008

            /s/ Steve Bailey
            -----------------------
            Steve Bailey
            Senior Managing Director, Chief Executive Officer Loan
            Administration
            (Senior officer in charge of the servicing function of
            Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.)
Exhibit B

Compensation by Work Task Code

For the Period August 1, 2019 to August 31, 2019

Activity/Professional Title Rate Hours Total

Fee Application/Client Billing

R. Brian Calvert Sr. Managing Director $  640.00 5.90 $       3,776.00

Spencer Ferrero Director     350.00 19.00          6,650.00

Activity Total 24.90 10,426.00

Attend Court Hearings/Review Pleadings

R. Brian Calvert Sr. Managing Director $  640.00 6.30          4,032.00

Activity Total 6.30 4,032.00

Claims Analysis/Objections

Bradley Sharp President & CEO $  685.00 64.50 $    44,182.50

R. Brian Calvert Sr. Managing Director     640.00 119.60        76,544.00

Thomas Jeremiassen Sr. Managing Director     575.00 60.40        34,730.00

Nicholas Troszak Managing Director     485.00 131.60        63,826.00

James Armstrong Director     375.00 88.90        33,337.50

Shelly Cuff Director 360.00      158.20        56,952.00

Spencer Ferrero Director     350.00 76.90        26,915.00

Andrew Wagner Director 350.00      180.70        63,245.00

James Romey Sr. Associate     360.00 3.40          1,224.00

Thomas Frey Sr. Associate     325.00 49.20        15,990.00

Jack Donohue Associate     250.00 50.30        12,575.00

Rowen Dizon Associate     230.00 5.90          1,357.00

Mandy Yedidsion Associate     145.00 28.10          4,074.50

Activity Total 1,017.70 $  434,952.50

Creditors and Creditors Committee Contact

Bradley Sharp President & CEO $  685.00 2.50 $       1,712.50

Activity Total 2.50 1,712.50

Travel (at 1/2 Billing Rate)

Bradley Sharp President & CEO $  342.50 4.00 $       1,370.00

R. Brian Calvert Sr. Managing Director     320.00 9.50          3,040.00

Thomas Jeremiassen Sr. Managing Director     287.50 7.00          2,012.50

Nicholas Troszak Managing Director     242.50 21.50          5,213.75

James Armstrong Director     187.50 1.70             318.75

Shelly Cuff Director 180.00      6.20          1,116.00

Activity Total 49.90 $    13,071.00

Total 1,101.30    $  464,194.00

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4729-2 Filed: 11/14/19 Entered: 11/14/19 14:52:57 Page 1

of 1
#### MARY A. BUMP v. CITY OF WILMINGTON.

(Filed 21 October, 1925.)

From *Dunn, J.,*at March Term, 1925, of New Hanover.

Action by plaintiff to recover damages of tbe defendant on account of personal injuries on account of negligence of tbe defendant in its *867failure to maintain its sidewalks in proper condition. Judgment was rendered upon a jury verdict in favor.» of the plaintiff in the sum of $2,500.

Defendant assigned error (a) in rejecting the evidence of one Quin-livan, who testified that he had examined the *locus in quo*two days before the trial; and (b) in declining to submit the issue of contributory negligence tendered by the defendant; and (c) in reciting plaintiff’s contentions, as to her injuries, in the language used by plaintiff as ’a witness; and (d) in declining defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict.

*Herbert McGlammy for plaintiff.*

*K. 0. Burgwin for defendant.*

Pee CueiaM.

An examination of the record satisfies us that the trial court committed no prejudicial error in rejecting the evidence of Quin-livan, for that it appeared that the *locus in quo*had been repaired since the injury and before the examination by the witness.

There was no evidence to support the issue of contributory negligence. The court is not required by statute to give the contentions of the parties. We are of the opinion that, in the instant case,, no prejudicial error resulted in reciting the contentions of plaintiff in her exact language. There was ample evidence to support the verdict. Therefore, we hold that there is

No error.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: MARTIN BORUNDA,

 

 Relator.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-16-00296-CR

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

O R D E R

The Court has reviewed the mandamus petition filed in the above styled and numbered 

cause and finds that it does not comply with Rule 52.2 and 52.3(a) of the Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure. The petition does not identify the State of Texas as a real party in interest 

to this original proceeding nor does it provide the name and address of the prosecutor’s office 

involved in the prosecution of the underlying traffic offense. The Court has determined it will 

not take any action on the mandamus petition until Relator has served the State with the 

petition. Relator is directed to file an amended certificate of service showing that he has 

complied with this order. The certificate of service must comply with TEX.R.APP.P. 9.5(e) and it 

must be filed no later than November 6, 2016. Failure to comply will result in dismissal of this 

original proceeding. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 3

rd day of November, 2016.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Hughes, JJ.
#### Edward Cahill et al., Respondents, v Robert I. Kowal et al., Defendants, and PSI Funding, Inc., Appellant.

[773 NYS2d 286]

*241Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Norma Ruiz, J.), entered April 10, 2002, which denied the motion of defendant PSI Funding, Inc. for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Inasmuch as triable issues have been raised as to whether plaintiffs injuries resulted from negligence in the permissive use or operation of a vehicle owned by PSI, PSI may be liable to plaintiff pursuant to Vehicle and Traffic Law § 388, and accordingly, summary judgment dismissing the complaint against PSI was properly denied *(see e.g. Sullivan v Spandau,*186 AD2d 641 [1992]; *see also Hassan v Montuori,*99 NY2d 348, 353 [2003]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Tom, Sullivan, Ellerin and Williams, JJ.
#### Lewis Roberts, Appellant, v. Edward B. Cobb, as Executor, etc., Respondent.

Judgment and order denying new trial reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.;

Dykman, J., not sitting.
#### Electus B. Litchfield, Plaintiff, v. Charles R. Flint, Defendant.

Order overruling demurrer by defendant reversed and demurrer sustained, with costs. Opinion by

Pratt, J.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 21-0332

_________________

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF:

JENNIFER S. CONROY,

 Petitioner and Appellant,

 and

MICHAEL SCOTT CONROY,

 Respondent and Appellee.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Mike Menahan, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 16 2022

03/16/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0332
PERSONAL DATA-PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a)

Date: _______________________

PERSONAL DATA-PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a)

AIR FORCE J1 DESK

INDIVIDUAL DUTY ASSIGNMENT (IDA) WORKSHEET

Member Information:

Rank/Name: ______________________ DAFSC: __________ SSN: _________________

Duty Title: ______________________________ Receiving SDAP: _____Y _____ N

 

Directorate: _______ Office Symbol: __________ Sponsor: _____________________ 

Duty Phone: __________________________ Cell Phone: ___________________________ 

Date Arrive Station (DAS): _____________ Date Depart Last Duty Station: ____________ 

RNLTD: ____________ # Days TDY Enroute: __________ DOB: ________________

Supervisor Information:

Rank/Name: __________________________________________________________________

Supervision Start Date: ______________________ Branch of Service: ____________________

Close Out Date of Last Report: _______________ Is EPR/OPR coming from last base? Y N 

Member Signature: _________________________________________________________ 

AF Desk Actions

Pre-Arrival Actions:

___ Build e-PIF ____ Project in FMTS ___ Project in SIPS MilPDS Pos number: ______________

___ Update Sponsor ____ Add arrival date to calendar FMTS Pos number: _____________

Billet Duty Title: ______________________________________________________________

Arrival Updates:

____ SIPS ___ FMTS ____ Update Rater (1 day after arrival) ___ Update Duty Title 

____ Milpds gain ____ Assignment Avail Code (Enlisted only- code 50) ___ AEF Update ___ Office Symbol

____ Add member to distro Lists (SOUTHCOM email) ____ Milpds pos number
# United States Space Command Biographies

United States Space Command Biographies RSS Feed

- GENERAL STEPHEN N. WHITING Gen. Stephen N. Whiting is the Commander, U.S. Space Command, headquartered at Peterson Space Force
- LIEUTENTANT GENERAL THOMAS L. JAMES LTG Thomas L. James serves as the Deputy Commander for United States Space Command, Peterson Space Force Base, Colorado.  United States Space Command is the Unified Combatant Command responsible for conducting operations in, from, and to space to deter conflict, and if necessary, defeat aggression, deliver space combat power to for the Joint/Combined force, and defend U.S. vital interests with allies and partners.
- CHIEF MASTER SERGEANT JACOB C. SIMMONS USSPACECOM/Command Senior Enlisted Leader
- RADM WILL PENNINGTON Rear Admiral Will Pennington, a native of Wilton, Iowa, graduated from the United States Naval Academy in 1989 with a Bachelor of Science in Economics.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 31, 2019

No. 04-19-00400-CR

David M. LOPEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019-CR-4232W

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

ORDER

This appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.

It is so ORDERED on July 31, 2019.

_____________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 31st day of July, 2019.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 7, 2015

No. 04-14-00900-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF N.M., A CHILD,

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-PA-03030

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In this accelerated appeal, appellant mother appeals an order of termination signed December 5, 

2014. Accordingly, the notice of appeal was due December 29, 2014, or a motion for extension of time to 

file the notice of appeal is due in this court no later than January 13, 2015. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1, 26.3. 

We have received a copy of the notice of appeal which is file-stamped January 5, 2015. The notice of 

appeal contains a certificate of service stating the notice of appeal was served on appellee on January 5, 

2015 by electronic service. The notice of appeal is untimely, but there is still time for appellant mother to 

file a timely motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal. 

Accordingly, we ORDER appellant mother to file a motion to extend time to file the notice of 

appeal in this court on or before January 13, 2015. 

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel, the district clerk, and 

the court reporter. We remind the court reporter the record was due in this court January 5, 2015, 

but has not been filed. 

___________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on 

this 7th day of January, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.2

Certifications

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned officer of Keystone Automotive Operations, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended June 30, 2007 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|      |  |                 |  |  |  |     |  |                                                     
|----- |  | --------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|      |  |                 |  | 
|Date: |  | August 13, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Donald T. Grimes                                
|      |  |                 |  |  |  |     |  | Donald T. Grimes                                    
|      |  |                 |  |  |  |     |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 and is not being filed as
part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Social Security Benefits |
|---------------------------------------|--------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Office of the Chief Actuary | Benefit Reduction for Early Retirement |
|-----------------------------|----------------------------------------|
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4834 Filed: 11/21/19 Entered: 11/21/19 11:44:30 Page 1 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4834 Filed: 11/21/19 Entered: 11/21/19 11:44:30 Page 2 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4834 Filed: 11/21/19 Entered: 11/21/19 11:44:30 Page 3 of

4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Notice Parties 

PG&E Corporation 

c/o Pacific Gas & Electric Company 

Attn: Janet Loduca, Esq. 

77 Beale Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 

Attn: Stephen Karotkin, Esq. 

 Jessica Liou, Esq. 

 Matthew Goren, Esq. 

767 Fifth Avenue 

New York, NY 10153 

The Office of the United States Trustee for Region 17 

Attn: Andrew Vara, Esq. 

 Timothy Laffredi, Esq.); 

450 Golden Gate Avenue, 5th Floor, Suite #05-0153 

San Francisco, CA 94102 

Milbank LLP 

Attn: Dennis F. Dunne, Esq. 

 Sam A. Khalil, Esq. 

55 Hudson Yards 

New York, NY 10001-2163 

Milbank LLP 

Attn: Paul S. Aronzon, Esq., 

 Gregory A. Bray, Esq., 

 Thomas R. Kreller, Esq. 

2029 Century Park East, 33rd Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90067 

Baker & Hostetler LLP 

 Attn: Eric Sagerman, Esq. and 

 Cecily Dumas, Esq. 

11601 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1400 

Los Angeles, CA 90025-0509 

Bruce A. Markell, Fee Examiner 

541 N. Fairbanks Ct., Ste 2200 

Chicago, IL 60611-3710 

Scott H. McNutt 

324 Warren Road 

San Mateo, California 94402 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4834 Filed: 11/21/19 Entered: 11/21/19 11:44:30 Page 4 of

4
Order entered July 13, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00210-CR

EMMANUEL MARTINEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F19-24906-V

ORDER

Before the Court is court reporter Kelly Simmons July 12, 2022 request for 

additional time to file the reporter’s record. We GRANT the request and ORDER 

the reporter’s record due by August 12, 2022.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE