alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 244 (Wednesday, December 20, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 65656]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30925]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Security for the Protection of the Public Financial 
Responsibility To Meet Liability Incurred for Death or Injury to 
Passengers or Other Persons on Voyages; Notice of Issuance of 
Certificate (Casualty)

    Notice is hereby given that the following have been issued a 
Certificate of Financial Responsibility to Meet Liability Incurred for 
Death or Injury to Passengers or Other Persons on Voyages pursuant to 
the provisions of Section 2, Public Law 89-777 (46 U.S.C. 817(d)) and 
the Federal Maritime Commission's implementing regulations at 46 C.F.R. 
part 540, as amended:

The Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Company, Princess 
Cruises, Inc., P & O Cruises (UK) Limited and Abbey National March 
Leasing (1) Limited, 77 New Oxford Street, London WC1A 1PP, England, 
Vessel: CANBERRA
The Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Company, Princess 
Cruises, Inc. and P & O Cruises (UK) Limited, 77 New Oxford Street, 
London WC1A 1PP, England, Vessel: ORIANA
The Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Company, Princess 
Cruises, Inc., P & O Cruises (UK) Limited and 3I Plc, 77 New Oxford 
Street, London WCIA IPP, England, Vessel: VICTORIA

    Dated: December 15, 1995.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-30925 Filed 12-19-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EXHIBIT E

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4522-5 Filed: 10/30/19 Entered: 10/30/19 11:56:18 Page 1

of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EXHIBIT E

EXPENSE DETAIL

FOR THE PERIOD AUGUST 18, 2019 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 17, 2019

DATE

PROFESSIONAL EXPENSE DETAIL AMOUNT

8/12/2019† Conference Calls $508.56

8/27/2019 Court Costs $42.50

8/28/2019-8/29/2019 Lanny Davis Airfare/ Train Fare $1,975.59

8/28/2019-8/29/2019 Lanny Davis Lodging $429.00

8/28/2019-8/29/2019 Lanny Davis Ground Transportation $1,000.93

8/28/2019-8/29/2019 Lanny Davis Business Meals $23.57

8/28/2019-8/29/2019 Lanny Davis Ground Transportation $280.00

8/28/2019-8/29/2019 Alex Lange Airfare/ Train Fare $2,119.59

8/28/2019-8/29/2019 Alex Lange Lodging $429.00

8/28/2019-8/29/2019 Alex Lange Ground Transportation $74.21

8/28/2019-8/29/2019 Alex Lange Business Meals $169.14

8/28/2019-8/29/2019 Alex Lange Court Costs $42.50

8/28/2019-8/29/2019 Alex Lange Ground Transportation $103.37

8/28/2019-8/29/2019 Emily Seeley Airfare/ Train Fare $2,205.60

8/28/2019-8/29/2019 Emily Seeley Lodging $429.00

8/28/2019-8/29/2019 Emily Seeley Business Meals $20.72

8/28/2019-8/29/2019 Emily Seeley Ground Transportation $69.36

8/28/2019-8/29/2019 Emily Seeley Ground Transportation $52.06

8/28/2019-8/29/2019 Eleanor McManus Airfare/ Train Fare $1,177.30

8/28/2019-8/29/2019 Eleanor McManus Lodging $429.00

 †

Omitted from First Monthly Fee Statement of Trident DMG LLC for Allowance and Payment of Compensation 

and Reimbursement of Expenses for the Period July 18, 2019 through August 17, 2019.

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4522-5 Filed: 10/30/19 Entered: 10/30/19 11:56:18 Page 2

of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATE

PROFESSIONAL EXPENSE DETAIL AMOUNT

8/28/2019-8/29/2019 Eleanor McManus Business Meals $3.80

8/28/2019-8/29/2019 Eleanor McManus Business Meals $90.89

8/28/2019-8/29/2019 Eleanor McManus Ground Transportation $77.45

8/28/2019-8/29/2019 Eleanor McManus Ground Transportation $46.37

TOTAL $11,799.51

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4522-5 Filed: 10/30/19 Entered: 10/30/19 11:56:18 Page 3

of 3
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 239 (Wednesday, December 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 64069]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30388]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[AK-962-1410-00-P; F-14946-B, F-14946-C, F-14946-D F-14946-A2, F-14946-
B2]


Alaska Native Claims Selection; Notice for Publication

    In accordance with Departmental regulation 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice 
is hereby given that decisions to issue conveyance under the provisions 
of Sec. 14(a) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act of December 
18, 1971, 43 U.S.C. 1601, 1613(a), will be issued to Teller Native 
Corporation for approximately 26,801.05 acres. The lands involved are 
in the vicinity of Teller, Alaska, within:

Kateel River Meridian, Alaska

Ts. 3 and 4 S., Rs. 35 W.
Ts. 3, 4, and 5 S., Rs. 36 W.
Ts. 4 and 5 S., Rs. 37 W.
Ts. 4 and 5 S., Rs. 38 W.

    A notice of the decisions will be published once a week, for four 
(4) consecutive weeks, in The Nome Nugget. Copies of the decisions may 
be obtained by contacting the Alaska State Office of the Bureau of Land 
Management, 222 West Seventh Avenue, #13, Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7599 
((907) 271-5960).
    Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely affected 
by the decision, an agency of the Federal government or regional 
corporation, shall have until January 12, 1996 to file an appeal. 
However, parties receiving service by certified mail shall have 30 days 
from the date of receipt to file an appeal. Appeals must be filed in 
the Bureau of Land Management at the address identified above, where 
the requirements for filing an appeal may be obtained. Parties who do 
not file an appeal in accordance with the requirements of 43 CFR Part 
4, Subpart E, shall be deemed to have waived their rights.
Carolyn A. Bailey,
Land Law Examiner, Branch of Gulf Rim Adjudication.
[FR Doc. 95-30388 Filed 12-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 7, 2022

No. 04-21-00300-CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF Van L. CRAPPS, Deceased

From the County Court at Law, Medina County, Texas

Trial Court No. 9498

Honorable Mark Cashion, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On December 2, 2022, this court requested Appellees’ response to Appellant’s motion for 

rehearing. On December 7, 2022, Appellees filed an unopposed motion for extension of time to 

file their response—until January 2, 2023. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.9. 

Appellees’ motion is GRANTED. The response is due on January 2, 2023. 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of December, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
#### Augustus C. Genet, Appellant, v. The President, etc., of the Delaware and Hudson Canal Company, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Van Brunt, P. J.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly report of PSPP Holdings, Inc.
on Form 10-QSB, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Larry Wilcox, Chief Executive Officer
(or equivalent thereof) and Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent thereof)
of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                              /s/ Larry Wilcox
                              -------------------------
                              Larry Wilcox
                              Chief Executive Officer (or equivalent thereof)
                              February 16, 2007
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 31, 2023

NO. 03

- 23

- 00254

- CV

Ronnie R. Price, Sr. , Appellant

v.

Expert Rentals and Property Management , Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF BELL COUNTY

BEFO RE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES KELLY AND THEOFANIS

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

–

OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on April 13, 2023 . Having

reviewed the record , the Court holds that Ronnie R. Price, Sr. has not prosecuted his appeal and

did not comply with a notice from the C lerk of this C ourt

. Therefore , the Cou rt dismisses the

appeal for want of prosecution. Because appellant is indigent and u nable to pay costs, no

adjudica t i on of costs is made.
Exhibit
10.09

    


    [SMH
CAPITAL letterhead]

     

     

    June 23,
2009

    


    Prosperity
Bank

    777
Walker Street, Suite L140

    Houston,
Texas 77002

    Attention
of Randall R. Reeves, President-Houston Area

    


    Re:           Credit
Agreement Dated as of May 11, 2009, between

    Sanders
Morris Harris Group Inc. and Prosperity Bank

    


    Ladies
and Gentlemen:

    


    Reference
is made to the Credit Agreement Dated as of May 11, 2009 (the “Credit
Agreement”), between Sanders Morris Harris Group Inc. (“Borrower”) and
Prosperity Bank (“Lender”), pursuant to which Lender made a $25,000,000 term
loan to Borrower on the terms and conditions set forth in the Credit Agreement.
Terms used herein with their initial letter capitalized shall have the meaning
assigned to them in the Credit Agreement unless otherwise defined
herein.

    


    The
purpose of this letter is to amend the affirmative covenant set forth in Section
5.17 of Article V of the Credit Agreement.

    


    In
consideration of the foregoing and the following mutual agreements, the Lender
and Borrower agree as follows:

    


    1.           Section
5.17 of the Credit Agreement is deleted and the following substituted in place
thereof:

    


    Section
5.17. Capital Markets
Division Disposition.  Consummate in full to the satisfaction
of the Lender the Capital Markets Division Disposition on or prior to September
1, 2009.

     

    2.           Except
as modified by the foregoing amendment, all terms, conditions, and provisions of
the Credit Agreement are and shall remain in full force and effect.

     

     

    
      
         

      

      
         

        
          

        

      

      
         

      

    

     

    
      Prosperity
Bank

      June 23,
2009

      Page
2

    

    
 

    


    Please
acknowledge your agreement with the foregoing amendment by signing this letter
in the space provided below.

    


    Very
truly yours,

    


    Sanders
Morris Harris Group Inc.

    


    


    By:  /s/
Rick Berry

      
        

      

    

    Rick
Berry, Chief Financial Officer

    


    


    Accepted
and agreed to this 23rd day of

    June,
2009.

    


    Prosperity
Bank

    


    


    By:  /s/
Randall R. Reeves

      
        

      

    

    Name:
Randall R. Reeves

    Title:
President-Houston Area
#### John B. Manning, Appellant, v. Bernard Reilly, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by

Brady, J.
Exhibit 10.38
 AMENDED AND RESTATED RETENTION AND OWNERSHIP
CHANGE EVENT AGREEMENT
 Clent Richardson
 RECITALS
   AGREEMENT
  Definitions




---



##### 



Termination Without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason
   Termination Without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason Due to a Change in
Control
  Amended And Restated Retention And Ownership Change Event Agreement  April 2009
    
    Page 2




---



##### 



Voluntary Termination
  Termination for Cause
 Modification to Comply with Section 409A
 At-Will Employment
 Dispute Resolution
 Amended And Restated Retention And Ownership Change Event Agreement  April 2009
    
    Page 3




---



##### 



www.adr.org
 Notices
 Successors
 Companys Successors
 Executives Successors
 Miscellaneous Provisions
 No Duty to Mitigate
 Modification/Waiver
 Integration
 Amended And Restated Retention And Ownership Change Event Agreement  April 2009
    
    Page 4




---



##### 



Choice of Law
 Severability
 Employment Taxes
 Counterparts
  Dated: April 20, 2009
    /s/ Clent RichardsonClent RichardsonImmersion CorporationDated: April 20, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Jack SaltichIts: Chairman Amended And Restated Retention And Ownership Change Event Agreement  April 2009
    
    Page 5
Skip to main content

# Social Security

Search
Menu
Español
Sign in

## Average Wage Indexing (AWI) Series
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 4, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 479-480]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-30,240]


Albee Textile, New York, NY; Notice of Revised Determination on 
Reopening

    On December 12, 1994, the Department, on its own motion, reopened 
its investigation for the former workers of the subject firm. The 
initial investigation resulted in a negative determination on November 
28, 1994 because the ``contributed importantly'' test of the Group 
Eligibility Requirements of the Trade Act was not met. The denial 
notice was published in the Federal Register on December 16, 1994 (59 
FR 65076).
    A late response to the Department's customer survey shows that a 
major customer accounting for a substantial portion of Albee's 1994 
sales decline switched its purchases from the subject firm to imports.
    U.S. imports of woven fabric increased, in absolute terms, in 1993 
compared to 1992.
    Other findings show that sales decreased in the first six months of 
1994 compared to the same period in 1993. Substantial worker 
separations occurred in 1993 and 1994.

Conclusion

    After careful consideration of the new facts obtained on reopening, 
it is concluded that increased imports of articles like or directly 
competitive with the woven fabric produced by the subject firm 
contributed importantly to the decline in production and to the total 
or partial separation of workers at the subject firm. In accordance 
with the provisions of the Trade Act of 1974, I make the following 
revised determination:

    ``All workers and former workers of Albee Textile, New York, New 
York who became totally or partially separated from employment on or 
after August 8, 1993, are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.''

    [[Page 480]] Signed at Washington, D.C., this 22nd day of 
December 1994.
Victor J. Trunzo,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-31 Filed 1-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 22, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-50450 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SERVANDO GALARZA-COLLAZO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-02-CR-641-1-AML

-------------------- Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Servando Galarza-Collazo appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Galarza-Collazo contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been alleged in his indictment. Galarza-Collazo maintains thatNo. 03-50450 -2- he pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for that offense.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Galarza-Collazo acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5382 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt aircraft management 

services from the ticket tax. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 31, 2014 

Mr. TIBERI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt 

aircraft management services from the ticket tax. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FROM TICKET TAX FOR AIRCRAFT 

4 MANAGEMENT SERVICES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4261 of the Internal Rev6 enue Code of 1986 is amended by redesignating subsection 

7 (k) as subsection (l) and by inserting after subsection (j) 

8 the following new subsection: 

9 ‘‘(k) EXEMPTION FOR AIRCRAFT MANAGEMENT

10 SERVICES.— 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5382 IH

1 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The tax imposed by this 

2 section or section 4271 shall not apply to the provi3 sion of aircraft management services for flights 

4 under the aviation safety regulations of part 91 of 

5 title 14, Code of Federal Regulations. 

6 ‘‘(2) EXCEPTION.—Paragraph (1) shall not ex7 empt flights for the transportation of persons under 

8 the aviation safety regulations of part 135 of title 

9 14, Code of Federal Regulations. 

10 ‘‘(3) AIRCRAFT MANAGEMENT SERVICES.—For 

11 purposes of paragraph (1), the term ‘aircraft man12 agement services’ means scheduling, flight planning, 

13 weather forecasting, and operation of flights; obtain14 ing insurance; maintenance, storage and fueling of 

15 aircraft; hiring, training and provision of pilots and 

16 crew; establishing and complying with safety stand17 ards; and such other services necessary to support 

18 flights.’’. 

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

20 this section shall apply to transportation beginning after 

21 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3273 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3273

  To take certain land in the State of California into trust for the 
 benefit of the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 29, 2021

 Mr. Padilla (for himself and Mrs. Feinstein) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To take certain land in the State of California into trust for the 
 benefit of the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Agua Caliente Land Exchange Fee to 
Trust Confirmation Act''.

SEC. 2. LAND TO BE TAKEN INTO TRUST FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE AGUA 
              CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS.

    (a) In General.--The approximately 2,560 acres of land owned by the 
Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians generally depicted as ``Lands to 
be Taken into Trust'' on the map entitled ``Agua Caliente Band of 
Cahuilla Indians Land to be Taken into Trust'' and dated November 17, 
2021, is hereby taken into trust by the United States for the benefit 
of the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians.
    (b) Administration.--Land taken into trust by subsection (a) shall 
be--
            (1) part of the reservation of the Agua Caliente Band of 
        Cahuilla Indians; and
            (2) administered in accordance with the laws and 
        regulations generally applicable to property held in trust by 
        the United States for the benefit of an Indian Tribe.
    (c) Gaming Prohibited.--Land taken into trust by subsection (a) 
shall not be eligible for gaming under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act 
(25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.).
                                 <all>
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 19

- 00569

- CV

IN RE April Marie SINGER

, Individually and as Trustee of the Singer Financial Man a gement Trust

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 4, 2019

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On August 23 , 2019, r elator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for interim

relief seeking a stay of the complained

- of trial court order . After considering the petition and the

record, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the re lief sought. Accordingly, the petition

for writ of mandamus is denied. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(a). The motion for interim relief is

denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2019CI03145, styled Robert C. Singer, III v. Ap ril Marie Singer, Individually

and as Trustee of the Singer Financial Management Trust , pending in the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County,

Texas, the Honorable Larry Noll presiding.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23




            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



To the Board of Directors
CONSORTEUM HOLDINGS, INC.


         We consent to the use of our report dated September 29, 2009, with
respect to the balance sheets of Consorteum Holdings, Inc. as of June 30, 2009
and 2008, and the related statements of operations and comprehensive (loss),
stockholders' (deficit) and cash flows for each of the two years in the period
ended June 30, 2009, and the period from November 7, 2005 (date of inception)
through June 30, 2009, incorporated herein by reference.


                                                /s/ SF Partnership, LLP


TORONTO, CANADA                                CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
September 29, 2009