alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

William Eggemeyer, Diane Eggemeyer, 

Bo Eggemeyer, and Sharyland Distribution 

& Transmission Services, LLC,

 

 Appellants,

v.

Charles Jackson Hughes,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00002-CV

Appeal from the

112th District Court

of Reagan County, Texas 

(TC# 1855)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS Corina Lozano’s request for an extension of time within which to file 

the Reporter’s Record until August 31, 2019. NO FURTHER REQUESTS FOR EXTENSION 

OF TIME TO FILE THE REPORTER’S RECORD WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that Corina Lozano, Court Reporter for the 112

th District Court for 

Reagan County, Texas, prepare the Reporter’s Record and forward the same to this Court on or 

before August 31, 2019.

If the Reporter’s Record is not filed with this Court by August 31, 2019, this Court will find

it necessary to send this case back to the trial court for a hearing as to why the Reporter’s Record

has not been filed.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 27th day of August, 2019.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
EX-10.6






EXHIBIT 10.6




January 8, 2004




Mr. Jeff Saling

[Address]




Dear Jeff:



I am pleased to offer you the position of Managing Director, West, reporting to Rick Furino, Vice
President, Consulting Services, North America. The position will commence not later than Monday,
January 26, 2004.



Your starting salary will be $180,000 per year, which equals $15,000 per month, subject to periodic
review. Additionally, you will be eligible to participate in an annual incentive compensation
program of 55% of your base salary. As a further incentive, we will recommend to the Board of
Directors that you be granted an option to purchase 2,500 shares of Callidus Software Inc. common
stock subject to the vesting schedule and terms and conditions of the Company’s stock plan.
Finally, to assist your move to the San Jose area, you will be eligible for a relocation allowance,
for up to 90 days from your start date, in accordance with our Relocation Policy, not to exceed
$10,000 in reasonable relocation expenses.



Callidus’ Standard policy requires that you have access to a car, have your own driver’s license,
and have a reasonable clean driving record and credit history (including a major credit card) and
that you participate in our direct deposit payroll program. Your role is expected to require a
high percentage of business travel.



The Company is an “at will” employer, which means that the employment relationship may be
terminated at any time by either the Company or by you, with or without notice and with or without
cause. By signing below, you acknowledge that your employment at Callidus is for an unspecified
duration, and neither this letter, nor your acceptance thereof, constitutes a contract of
employment.



In accordance with Callidus’ standard policy, this offer is contingent upon your completing and
executing an Employment, Confidential Information and Invention Assignment Agreement (“Invention
Agreement”) and upon your providing the Company with the legally required proof of your identity.
The Company also requires proof of eligibility to work in the United States.



On behalf of Callidus Software, we very much look forward to your acceptance of this offer. I have
enclosed two executed copies of this offer letter. As evidence of your acceptance, please sign
both letters and return one original along with the signed Invention Agreement to Julie Gonzalez,
Staffing Manager, not later than

5:00 P.M. PST Friday, January 9, 2004.




Sincerely,




/s/ J

 





Ron J. Fior

Vice President Finance & Chief Financial Officer





                                           /s/ Jeff Saling



Agreed and Accepted:                                           Date:
#### MRS. JESSIE P. BULLARD, Administratrix of the Estate of E. A. BULLARD, Deceased, v. HOTEL HOLDING COMPANY, a Corporation. MRS. DALE F. NOBLE, Administratrix of the Estate of WALTER B. NOBLE, Deceased, v. HOTEL HOLDING COMPANY, a Corporation.

(Filed 28 March, 1945.)

Appeal by plaintiffs from *Bone, J.,*at October Term, 1944, of WayNE.

Two civil actions to recover damages for alleged wrongful deaths of intestates of plaintiffs as result of injuries sustained in fire in hotel of defendant in which they wej-e lodging, consolidated for the purpose of trial, and tried together.

From judgment as in case of nonsuit, entered at close of their evidence, plaintiffs appeal to Supreme Court and assign error.

*Taliaferro <& Clarkson, Tillett <& Campbell, Wilkinson •<& King, and W. A. Dees for plaintiffs, appellants.*

*Langston, Allen <& Taylor and Jones & Smathers for defendant, ap-pellee.*

Per Curiam.

One member of the Court, *Barnhill, J.,*not sitting, and the remaining six being evenly divided in opinion as to whether on the *767record on tbis appeal there is any sufficient evidence of negligence on the part of defendant as alleged by plaintiffs, the judgment of Superior Court is affirmed, according to usual practice of the Court in such cases, and stands as the decision in this case — without becoming a precedent. *Howard v. Coach Co.,*216 N. C., 799, 4 S. E. (2d), 449; *Pafford v. Construction Co.,*218 N. C., 782, 11 S. E. (2d), 548; *Smith v. Furniture Co.,*221 N. C., 536, 19 S. E. (2d), 17; *Whichard v. Lipe,*223 N. C., 856, 25 S. E. (2d), 593.

Affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk July 24, 2012

p0716 

# Order

July 24, 2012

144815

RONALD D. PEPPLER,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 14 4815

COA: 300194

Wayne CC: 09

- 025460

- CK

THE PEPPLER AGENCY, INC., and

JANET L. PEPPLER,

Defendants

- Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 13, 2011

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 31.1
       a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Clent Richardson

Clent RichardsonPresident and Chief Executive Officer
#### Town of Westchester, Respondent, v. James Henderson, Jr., Appellant.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Opinion by

Pratt, J,;

Dykman J., not sitting.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 16

- 10002 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:15

- cr - 00210

- JDW

- AEP

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus

CINDY S. CARABEO, Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

________________________ (September 15, 2016) Before TJOFLAT, JULIE CARNES and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Case: 16-10002 Date Filed: 09/15/2016 Page: 1 of 22 Adeel Bashir , appointed counsel for Cindy Carabeo in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation o f the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Becau se independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and Carabeo ’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED

.

Case: 16-10002 Date Filed: 09/15/2016 Page: 2 of 2
#### Ignatius C. Donnelly, Respondent, v. William Deering, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7532-7533]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3062]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. ER94-1474-000

Pepperell Power Associates Limited Partnership; Notice of Filing
February 2, 1995.
    Take notice that on February 1, 1995, Pepperell Power Associates 
Limited Partnership filed an amendment in this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 
20426, in accordance with Rules [[Page 7533]] 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 
385.214). All such motions or protests should be filed on or before 
February 13, 1995. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-3062 Filed 2-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EX-10.7






EXHIBIT 10.7




April 14, 2008




Jeffrey S. Saling

[Address]




Dear Jeff:



Congratulations! I am pleased to announce that you have been promoted to the position of Senior
Vice-President, On-Demand reporting to Leslie Stretch, President and CEO. This promotion is
effective as of April 8, 2008.



Furthermore, you will be awarded 21,000 shares of the common stock of Callidus Software Inc. in the
form of Restricted Stock Units (RSUs). The RSUs will be awarded as of the last business day of May
(May 30, 2008, specifically) in accordance with Company policy and the first vesting date will be
July 31, 2008 and quarterly thereafter until such RSUs are fully vested in three years pursuant to
Company policy regarding follow-on RSU grants. Also as a member of the executive management team,
and as a section 16 officer of Callidus, you are eligible for Callidus’ Change of Control Agreement
(the “Change of Control Agreement”) and Indemnification Agreement, each of which are attached
hereto as Exhibit A and Exhibit B, respectively. You need to execute and return these agreements
to Callidus for countersignature, at which time they will become effective.



Callidus is an “at will” employer, which means that the employment relationship may be terminated
at any time by either the Company, or by you, with or without notice and with or without cause.
With this new role, should you be involuntarily terminated other than for cause at any time, you
shall receive a 7-month base pay severance payment (lump sum) and payment of your applicable COBRA
for 7 months, in return for signing a full release of rights. By signing below, you acknowledge
that your employment at Callidus is for an unspecified duration, and neither this letter, nor your
acceptance thereof, constitutes a contract of employment.



Jeff, on behalf of Callidus Software, congratulations again!




Sincerely,




/s/ Leslie Stretch




Leslie Stretch

President and Chief Executive Officer

Callidus Software Inc.





	cc:	 	Leslie Bowers
	 	 	Paul Katawicz





	 	 	 
	/s/ Jeff Saling

	 	4/28/08
	 
	 	 

	Jeffrey S. Saling

	 	Date
Exhibit 32.1

Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

This
certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K (the "Form 10-K")
for the year ended December 31, 2007 of Manhattan Bancorp (the "Company").

I,
Jeffrey M. Watson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that, to the best of my knowledge:



Dated:
April 9, 2008

| | /s/JEFFREY M. WATSONJeffrey M. Watson President and Chief Executive Officer
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Whiting underscores growing partnerships, capabilities required for competition, conflict at Space Symposium 39

U.S. Space Command

                COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo.  –              Gen. Whiting's keynote address transcript

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
Exhibit 10.16


 





PROMISSORY
NOTE


 


	$25,000.00	August
    21, 2009


 


FOR
VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Lipella Pharmaceuticals Inc. (the “Borrower”), promises to pay to the order of Michael
Chancellor (the “Lender”), the principal sum of Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars and Zero Cents ($25,000.00), with interest
thereon at the rate of eight and three quarters percent (8.75%) per annum, said principal and all accrued interest thereon being
payable in full, without notice or demand, on November 22, 2009.


 


The
Borrower reserves the right of prepaying all or a portion of the principal balance hereof, but only in conjunction with payment
of all accrued interest (calculated on a daily basis) on the amount prepaid through the date of such prepayment, at any time without
penalty. All payments on or in respect of this Note or the indebtedness evidenced hereby shall be made to the Lender without set-off,
counterclaim and free and clear of deductions of any kind.


 


All
persons now or hereafter liable for the principal amount due on this Note or any part hereof do expressly waive presentment for
payment, notice of dishonor, protest and notice of protest and agree that the time for the payment of this Note may be extended
without releasing or otherwise affecting their liability on this Note, or any other security agreements or guarantees, if any,
securing this Note.


 


This
Note was signed at Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania and shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the provisions of the laws
of the Commonwealth Pennsylvania. Any failure of the Lender or the legal holder hereof to exercise any option herein provided
upon default shall not constitute a waiver of the right to exercise such option in the event of any continuing or subsequent default.
The Borrower hereby agrees that the maturity of all or any part of the indebtedness evidenced hereby may be postponed or extended
without prejudice to its liability on this Note.


 


This
Note will be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Borrower and the Lender and their respective successors and assigns;
provided, however, that the Borrower may not assign this Note in whole or in part without the prior written consent
of Lender.


 


If
any provision of this Note is illegal, or hereafter rendered illegal, or is for any other reason void, voidable or otherwise unenforceable
or invalid, or hereafter rendered void, voidable or otherwise unenforceable or invalid, the remainder of this Note shall not be
affected thereby, but shall be construed as if it does not contain such provision.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, and intending to be
legally bound, the Borrower has executed and delivered this Note as of the date first above written.


 


	 	LIPELLA PHARMACEUTICALS
    INC.
	 	 
	 	/s/ Jonathan
    Kaufman 
	 	By: Jonathan Kaufman 
	 	Title: President
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 240 (Thursday, December 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 64237]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30454]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration


Intelligent Transportation Society of America; Public Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Intelligent Transportation Society of America (ITS 
AMERICA) will hold a meeting of its Coordinating Council on January 9, 
1996. The session is expected to focus on: (1) Federal Intelligent 
Transportation Systems (ITS) reports; (2) ITS AMERICA President's 
report; (3) Dedicated Short Range Communications Standard; (4) Report 
on Intermodal Transportation Workshop; (5) Update on Outreach 
Activities to State and Local Governments; (6) Update on ITS AMERICA 
Committee Action Plans; (7) Update on World Congress activities; (8) 
Discussion of the ITS AMERICA Sixth Annual Meeting. ITS AMERICA 
provides a forum for national discussion and recommendations on ITS 
activities including programs, research needs, strategic planning, 
standards, international liaison, and priorities. The charter for the 
utilization of ITS AMERICA establishes this organization as an advisory 
committee under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. 
app. 2, when it provides advice or recommendations to DOT officials on 
ITS policies and programs. (56 FR 9400, March 6, 1991).

DATES: The Coordinating Council of ITS AMERICA will meet on January 9 
from 9:30 a.m. to 12:00 noon (Eastern Standard time).

ADDRESSES: Sheraton Washington Hotel, 2660 Woodley Road, NW., 
Washington, D.C. 20008, (202) 328-2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Materials associated with this meeting 
may be examined at the offices of ITS AMERICA, 400 Virginia Avenue, 
SW., Suite 800, Washington, D.C. 20024. Persons desiring further 
information or to request to speak at this meeting should contact Mr. 
Chris Body at ITS AMERICA by telephone at (202) 484-4131, or by FAX at 
(202) 484-3483. The DOT contact is Mr. Whitey Metheny, FHWA, HVH-1, 
Washington, D.C. 20590, (202) 366-2835. Office hours are from 8:00 a.m. 
to 4:30 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday, except for legal holidays.

    (23 U.S.C. 315; 49 CFR 1.48)

    Issued on: December 6, 1995
Christine M. Johnson,
Director, ITS Joint Program Office.
[FR Doc. 95-30454 Filed 12-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00211-CV

CLAUDE L. DAILEY, JR. APPELLANT

V.

PATRICIA ANN DAILEY APPELLEE

----------

FROM THE 324TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

Appellant Claude L. Dailey, Jr. attempts to appeal temporary orders in a 

divorce suit that state they are effective only until the final decree is 

rendered. We notified the parties of our concern that this court may not have 

jurisdiction over the appeal because the orders did not appear to be 

appealable. We informed the parties that unless appellant or any party desiring 

to continue the appeal filed a timely response with the court showing grounds for 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

continuing the appeal, we would dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See

Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 44.3.

We received a response, but it does not show grounds for continuing the 

appeal. Temporary orders are not appealable interlocutory orders. See Tex. 

Fam. Code Ann. § 105.001(e) (West 2008); see also Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. 

Code Ann. § 51.014(a) (West 2008) (listing types of appealable interlocutory 

orders); In re J.W.L., 291 S.W.3d 79, 83 (Tex. App.––Fort Worth 2009, orig. 

proceeding [mand. denied]) (noting that temporary order is not appealable). 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.3(a), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: August 4, 2011
AAA Free Move Ministorage, 

s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 13, 2013

No. 04-12-00775-CV

OIS INVESTMENTS INC.,

Appellant

v.

AAA FREE MOVE MINISTORAGE, LLC.,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 377499

Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

The panel has considered the Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing, and the motion is 

DENIED.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 13th day of November, 2013.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court