UNITED STATES
                     SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                            WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                  FORM 10-K


  (Mark one)

  /X/ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
      EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
      For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007

      OR


  / / TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
      EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
      For the transition period from ____________ to ____________



      Commission file number: 333-133985-45

      Structured Asset Securities Corporation Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-BC1
      (exact name of issuing entity as specified in its charter)

      Structured Asset Securities Corporation
      (exact name of the depositor as specified in its charter)

      Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
      (exact name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)



  Delaware                                74-2440850
  (State or other jurisdiction of         (I.R.S. Employer
  incorporation or organization)          Identification No.)



  745 Seventh Avenue
   New York, NY                                10019
  (Address of principal executive             (Zip Code)
  offices)


 Telephone number, including area code: (212) 526-7000



  Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

    NONE.



  Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

    NONE.



  Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as
  defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

    Yes ___     No  X



  Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports
  pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

    Yes ___     No  X




  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
  required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
  of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
  registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
  such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

    Yes  X      No ___



  Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
  405 of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained
  herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in
  definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part
  III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

   X

  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer,
  an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
  company.  See the definitions of "large accelerated filer", "accelerated
  filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

   Large accelerated filer ___
   Accelerated filer ___
   Non-accelerated filer X (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
   Smaller reporting company ___

  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined
  in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

    Yes ___     No  X



  State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity
  held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the
  common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such
  common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant's most recently
  completed second fiscal quarter.

    Not applicable.



  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and
  reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
  Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a
  plan confirmed by a court.

    Not applicable.



  Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's
  classes of common stock, as of the last practicable date.

    Not applicable.



  DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

  List hereunder the following documents if incorporated by reference and the
  Part of the Form 10-K (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) into which the document
  is incorporated: (1)Any annual report to security holders; (2) Any proxy or
  information statement; and (3)Any prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)
  or (c) under the Securities Act of 1933. The listed documents should be
  clearly described for identification purposes (e.g., annual report to
  security holders for fiscal year ended December 24, 1980).

    Not applicable.





                                     PART I

  Item 1.      Business.

               Not applicable.


  Item 1A.     Risk Factors.

               Not applicable.


  Item 1B.     Unresolved Staff Comments.

               None.


  Item 2.      Properties.

               Not applicable.


  Item 3.      Legal Proceedings.

               None.


  Item 4.      Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

               Not applicable.




                                     PART II

  Item 5.      Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder
               Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

               Not applicable.


  Item 6.      Selected Financial Data.

               Not applicable.


  Item 7.      Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
               Results of Operation.

               Not applicable.


  Item 7A.     Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

               Not applicable.


  Item 8.      Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

               Not applicable.


  Item 9.      Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and
               Financial Disclosure.

               Not applicable.


  Item 9A.     Controls and Procedures.

               Not applicable.


  Item 9A(T).  Controls and Procedures.

               Not applicable.


  Item 9B.     Other Information.

               None.




                                    PART III

  Item 10.     Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

               Not applicable.


  Item 11.     Executive Compensation.

               Not applicable.


  Item 12.     Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
               and Related Stockholder Matters.

               Not applicable.


  Item 13.     Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
               Independence.

               Not applicable.


  Item 14.     Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

               Not applicable.




  ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURE ITEMS PURSUANT TO GENERAL INSTRUCTION J


Item 1112(b) of Regulation AB, Significant Obligor Financial Information.

None.



Item 1114(b)(2) of Regulation AB, Significant Enhancement  Provider Financial
Information.

None.



Item 1115(b) of Regulation AB, Certain Derivatives Instruments (Financial
Information).

None.



Item 1117 of Regulation AB, Legal Proceedings.

Perrie Bonner v. H&R Block Mortgage Corporation; Phillips v. H&R Block Mortgage
Corporation, Option One Mortgage Corporation; and, H&R Block, Inc.
(California); and Wojtzcek v. H&R Block Mortgage Corporation (Wisconsin). On
April 29, 2005, H&R Block Mortgage Corporation ("HRBMC") was named as a
defendant and served with a class action complaint filed by Perrie Bonner, as
plaintiff, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of
Indiana, Hammond Division. The complaint alleges that HRBMC accessed the
plaintiff's consumer report without his consent or for any lawful reason, in
violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act ("FCRA"). This action is one of
several actions filed earlier against other lenders by the same plaintiff and
his attorneys on a similar basis in the same court. The Wojtzcek and Phillips
actions allege similar violations. HRBMC moved before the Multidistrict
Judicial Panel to seek a transfer of the three complaints, which ordered the
transfer of the three actions to the Northern District of Indiana, Judge
Rudy J. Lozano, for coordinated pretrial proceedings. On August 10, 2007, the
Court granted class certification, certifying three classes: (1) in Bonner,
all persons within the Northern District of Indiana to whom HRBMC sent a
solicitation between April 29, 2003 and May 19, 2005 and who did not obtain
credit in response thereto; (2) in Phillips, all persons in Harris County,
Texas to whom HRBMC sent a solicitation during the longest permissible
statutory period; and (3) in Wojtczak, all persons with a Wisconsin address to
whom HRBMC sent a solicitation since November 20, 2004. HRBMC has been ordered
to provide class lists to plaintiffs' counsel by March 7, 2008; plaintiffs'
counsel then has 36 days within which to mail class notices (at plaintiffs'
counsel's expense) or settle the cases individually.

Fees, et al. v. Option One Mortgage Corporation (putative class action filed in
August 2001 in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, on behalf of
borrowers allegedly charged an illegal title indemnity and/or reconveyance fee
as a condition of releasing their mortgages). The class certification hearing
occurred on January 31, 2006, after which the court certified a nationwide
class. Option One Mortgage Corporation's appeal of the certification was denied
by the appellate court on September 14, 2006. Option One Mortgage Corporation
is waiting for plaintiffs' counsel to specify his classes, which it anticipates
will be severely limited, if not eliminated by, motions to decertify.

Freitag, et al. v. Option One Mortgage Corporation (putative class action filed
July 29, 2004 in Madison County, Illinois). The complaint seeks certification
of a nationwide class and alleges that Option One Mortgage Corporation engages
in the practice of improperly retaining extra per diem interest on residential
mortgage loans by charging per diem interest up to and including the date of
payoff. Settlement in the amount of $25,000 to the named plaintiff received
court approval on January 1, 2005. Plaintiffs' counsel filed an amended
complaint naming new class representatives on June 10, 2005. Option One
Mortgage Corporation filed a notice of removal to federal court and a motion to
compel arbitration. Plaintiffs have filed a motion to remand. Plaintiffs agreed
to stay further proceedings pending a decision of the Illinois Supreme Court in
the Kinkel case regarding the enforceability of arbitration agreements that
contain class action waivers. Kinkel decision issued October 5, 2006; held that
class action waivers were not per se unconscionable. Judge Byron held in favor
of lender in identical case (Hogle v. Wachovia Mortgage Corp.) on April 21,
2006; case currently on appeal. If upheld on appeal, this case will be
dismissed.

In December, 2007, Option One Mortgage Corporation was served with a law suit
by the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP),
which lists twelve other defendants, and alleges discrimination and fair
housing violations. The current analysis of Option One Mortgage Corporation's
legal department is that Option One Mortgage Corporation will be removed as a
defendant in this case.

Schueler, et a1 v. H&R Block Mortgage Corporation and Option One Mortgage
Corporation. On April 9, 2007, HRMBC and Option One Mortgage Corporation were
named as defendants and served with a class action complaint filed by Melissa
Schueler, et al., as plaintiff, in the United States District Court for the
Central District of California, Southern Division. The complaint alleges that
Option One Mortgage Corporation's affiliate, HRBMC, failed to pay overtime
wages to its loan officers in accordance with the Fair Labor Standards Act and
that such alleged failure constitutes an unfair business practice under
California's Business and Professions Code. Option One Mortgage Corporation is
named as a defendant under the theory that it and HRBMC operate as a single
employer. Option One Mortgage Corporation and HRBMC's motion to dismiss was
denied. On January 24,2008, the Court issued an Order granting in part and
denying in part plaintiff's Motion for Notice pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 216(b). On
February 13,2008, Notice to Present and Former Employees, Consent to Join and
Stipulated Proposed Order was submitted to the Court for approval.

H&R Block Mortgage received a Civil Investigative Demand from the Federal Trade
Commission on 2/22/2006 regarding voicemail broadcasts. H&R Block Mortgage has
been cooperating with the FTC and producing records in response to the CID.

On September 4, 2007, Option One Mortgage Corporation was served with a class
action lawsuit filed in United States District Court for the Northern District
of Illinois, Eastern Division (Shavers v. Option One Mortgage Corporation).
Option One Mortgage Corporation is the fourth defendant named in similar suits.
The suit alleges discrimination and fair housing violations. Option One
Mortgage Corporation filed its motion to dismiss November 13, 2007 based on
Bell Atl. Corp. v Twombly 127 Supreme Court 55 (2007). The current analysis of
Option One Mortgage Corporation's legal department is that Option One Mortgage
Corporation will be dismissed from this case.

On November 14, 2007, Option One Mortgage Corporation received a Joint
Subpoena/Investigative Demand from the Ohio Attorney General and the Ohio
Department of Commerce. The Demand indicates an investigation into the
possibility of 1) unfair and deceptive acts and practices in connection with
the servicing and foreclosure of loans; 2) non compliance with the Ohio Second
Mortgage Loan Act; and 3) violation of the state anti-trust statute as it
relates to creation and rating of subprime mortgage investment vehicles. Option
One Mortgage Corporation is cooperating with the Attorney General's office
producing records in response to the CID.

On March 29, 2007 Option One Mortgage Corporation received notice of a Civil
Investigative Demand ("CID") issued by the Office of the Attorney General for
the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The CID states that the Massachusetts
Attorney General is seeking certain information as part of a pending
investigation "regarding methods, acts or practices allegedly in violation of
G.L. C. 93A, ss. 2(a), in connection with residential mortgage loans." In
addition, On August 29, 2007, Option One Mortgage Corporation received a
follow-up CID that included requests for new documents as well as expanded
information pertaining to documents previously provided. Option One Mortgage
Corporation has been cooperating with the Attorney General's Office producing
records in response to the CID. On March 4, 2008, Option One Mortgage
Corporation received a letter pursuant to the above named statute that provided
notice of an intent to bring suit against Option One Mortgage Corporation if
the matter could not be resolved.



Item 1119 of Regulation AB, Affiliations and Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions.

Information required by item 1119 has been omitted from this annual report on
Form 10-K because it is materially the same information as has been provided
previously in a prospectus timely filed pursuant to Rule 424 promulgated under
the Securities Act of 1933 under the same Central Index Key (CIK) code as this
annual report on Form 10-K.



Item 1122 of Regulation AB, Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria.

Reports on assessment of compliance with the servicing criteria for asset-backed
securities are attached hereto under Item 15.

Clayton

One instance where a mortgage insurance analysis should have been included
but was not, in the June 2007 Credit Risk Manager Report for SASCO 2007-BC1
(which reports on the April 2007 distribution)

LaSalle Bank, National Association as Custodian

LaSalle Bank National Association's ("LaSalle") Report on Assessment of
Compliance with Servicing Criteria for 2007 (the "2007 Assessment") attached to
this Report on Form 10-K describes in Appendix B the following material
instance of noncompliance related to investor reporting:

"1122(d)(3)(i)(A) and (B) - During the Reporting Period, certain monthly
investor or remittance reports were not prepared in accordance with the terms
set forth in the transaction agreements and certain investor reports did not
provide the information calculated in accordance with the terms specified in
the transaction agreements for which certain individual errors may or may not
have been material."

The investor reporting errors identified on LaSalle's 2007 Assessment as
material instances of noncompliance (the "Investor Reporting Errors") included,
for example, revised delinquency, REO, foreclosure, repurchase, payoff or
modified loan counts, category indicators and/or balances. The conclusion that
the Investor Reporting Errors amounted to a material instance of noncompliance
was based primarily on the aggregate number of errors as opposed to the
materiality of any one error.

The Investor Reporting Errors were generally caused by human error resulting
primarily from high volume monthly data processing demands that had to be
addressed within constricted time frames with less than a full complement of
operational staff. Between the fourth quarter of the Reporting Period and the
date of the 2007 Assessment, LaSalle has employed additional operational staff
to accommodate the high volume of monthly investor reporting requirements and
minimize the risk of the Investor Reporting Errors recurring. Other necessary
controls are in place to minimize the risk of such errors.

With respect to the specific pool assets and asset-backed securities related to
the Investor Reporting Errors, the errors did not have, and are not reasonable
likely in the future to have, any material impact or effect on pool asset
performance, servicing of the pool assets and payments or expected payments on
the mortgage-backed securities.

In this transaction, LaSalle served as custodian. Please note that this
additional disclosure does not relate to LaSalle's custodial Servicing Criteria
under Item 1122.

Option One Mortgage Corporation as Servicer

For SEC Regulation AB 1122(d)(4)(vi), loan modifications are required to be
completed in accordance with the transaction agreements and related pool asset
documents. Management notes instances of conflicting language within three PSAs
where the verbiage first indicates to generally modify loans if in the best
interest of the trust, but later qualifies the allowable interest rate
reduction. Non-compliance within this Regulation AB criterion is a result of
Management's incorrect interpretation of the former guidance taking precedence.



Item 1123 of Regulation AB, Servicer Compliance Statement.

Servicer compliance statements are attached hereto under Item 15.

Option One Mortgage Corporation as Servicer

For SEC Regulation AB 1122(d)(4)(vi), loan modifications are required to be
completed in accordance with the transaction agreements and related pool asset
documents. Management notes instances of conflicting language within three PSAs
where the verbiage first indicates to generally modify loans if in the best
interest of the trust, but later qualifies the allowable interest rate
reduction. Non-compliance within this Regulation AB criterion is a result of
Management's incorrect interpretation of the former guidance taking precedence.



                               Part IV

  Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

  (a) Exhibits.

  (4) Trust Agreement dated as of January 1, 2007, among Structured Asset
  Securities Corporation, as Depositor, Aurora Loan Services LLC, as Master
  Servicer, Clayton Fixed Income Services Inc., as Credit Risk Manager, and
  Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee (incorporated herein by reference from
  Exhibit 4.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K of the registrant, as filed
  with the Commission on February 14, 2007, Commission File Number
  333-133985-45, CIK number 0001386700).

  (10) Incorporated by reference as Exhibit (4).

  (31) Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.

  (33) Reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
  asset-backed securities.


    <TABLE>
    
      <c>

    33.1 Aurora Loan Services LLC, as Servicer
    33.2 Aurora Loan Services LLC, as Master Servicer
    33.3 Chase Home Finance LLC, as Subservicer for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
    33.4 Clayton Fixed Income Services, Inc., as Credit Risk Manager
    33.5 Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Custodian
    33.6 FIS Tax Services f/k/a LSI Tax Services, as Sub-Contractor for Option One Mortgage
    Corporation
    33.7 JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Servicer
    33.8 LaSalle Bank, National Association, as Custodian
    33.9 Newport Management Corporation, as Sub-Contractor for Aurora Loan Services LLC
    33.10 Option One Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer
    33.11 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee and Paying Agent
    33.12 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian
    33.13 Westlake Settlement Services, LLC, as Sub-Contractor for Aurora Loan Services LLC
    33.14 ZC  Real Estate Tax Solutions Limited, as Sub-Contractor for Option One Mortgage
    Corporation
    33.15 ZC Sterling Insurance Agency, Inc., as Sub-Contractor for Option One Mortgage
    Corporation

    </TABLE>


  (34) Attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
  for asset-backed securities.


    <TABLE>
    
      <c>

    34.1 Aurora Loan Services LLC, as Servicer
    34.2 Aurora Loan Services LLC, as Master Servicer
    34.3 Chase Home Finance LLC, as Subservicer for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
    34.4 Clayton Fixed Income Services, Inc., as Credit Risk Manager
    34.5 Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Custodian
    34.6 FIS Tax Services f/k/a LSI Tax Services, as Sub-Contractor for Option One Mortgage
    Corporation
    34.7 JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Servicer
    34.8 LaSalle Bank, National Association, as Custodian
    34.9 Newport Management Corporation, as Sub-Contractor for Aurora Loan Services LLC
    34.10 Option One Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer
    34.11 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee and Paying Agent
    34.12 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian
    34.13 Westlake Settlement Services, LLC, as Sub-Contractor for Aurora Loan Services LLC
    34.14 ZC  Real Estate Tax Solutions Limited, as Sub-Contractor for Option One Mortgage
    Corporation
    34.15 ZC Sterling Insurance Agency, Inc., as Sub-Contractor for Option One Mortgage
    Corporation

    </TABLE>


   (35) Servicer compliance statement.


    <TABLE>
    
       <c>

    35.1 Aurora Loan Services LLC, as Servicer
    35.2 Aurora Loan Services LLC, as Master Servicer
    35.3 Chase Home Finance LLC, as Subservicer for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
    35.4 JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Servicer
    35.5 Option One Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer

    </TABLE>


   (b) Exhibits identified in paragraph (a) above.

   (c) Not applicable.



                          SIGNATURES


  Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
  Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be
  signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


   Structured Asset Securities Corporation Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-BC1
   (Issuing Entity)

   Aurora Loan Services LLC
   (Master Servicer)

   /s/ E. Todd Whittemore
   E. Todd Whittemore, Executive Vice President
   (Senior Officer in charge of the servicing function of Aurora Loan
   Services LLC, in its capacity as master servicer)

   Aurora Loan Services LLC, as Master Servicer


    Date:   March 27, 2008



  Exhibit Index

  Exhibit No.


   (4) Trust Agreement dated as of January 1, 2007, among Structured Asset
   Securities Corporation, as Depositor, Aurora Loan Services LLC, as Master
   Servicer, Clayton Fixed Income Services Inc., as Credit Risk Manager, and
   Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee (incorporated herein by reference from
   Exhibit 4.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K of the registrant, as filed
   with the Commission on February 14, 2007, Commission File Number
   333-133985-45, CIK number 0001386700).

   (10) Incorporated by reference as Exhibit (4).

   (31) Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.

   (33) Reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
   asset-backed securities.


    <TABLE>

    
      <c>
    33.1 Aurora Loan Services LLC, as Servicer
    33.2 Aurora Loan Services LLC, as Master Servicer
    33.3 Chase Home Finance LLC, as Subservicer for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
    33.4 Clayton Fixed Income Services, Inc., as Credit Risk Manager
    33.5 Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Custodian
    33.6 FIS Tax Services f/k/a LSI Tax Services, as Sub-Contractor for Option One Mortgage
    Corporation
    33.7 JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Servicer
    33.8 LaSalle Bank, National Association, as Custodian
    33.9 Newport Management Corporation, as Sub-Contractor for Aurora Loan Services LLC
    33.10 Option One Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer
    33.11 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee and Paying Agent
    33.12 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian
    33.13 Westlake Settlement Services, LLC, as Sub-Contractor for Aurora Loan Services LLC
    33.14 ZC  Real Estate Tax Solutions Limited, as Sub-Contractor for Option One Mortgage
    Corporation
    33.15 ZC Sterling Insurance Agency, Inc., as Sub-Contractor for Option One Mortgage
    Corporation

    </TABLE>

   (34) Attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
   criteria for asset-backed securities.


    <TABLE>

    
      <c>
    34.1 Aurora Loan Services LLC, as Servicer
    34.2 Aurora Loan Services LLC, as Master Servicer
    34.3 Chase Home Finance LLC, as Subservicer for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
    34.4 Clayton Fixed Income Services, Inc., as Credit Risk Manager
    34.5 Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Custodian
    34.6 FIS Tax Services f/k/a LSI Tax Services, as Sub-Contractor for Option One Mortgage
    Corporation
    34.7 JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Servicer
    34.8 LaSalle Bank, National Association, as Custodian
    34.9 Newport Management Corporation, as Sub-Contractor for Aurora Loan Services LLC
    34.10 Option One Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer
    34.11 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee and Paying Agent
    34.12 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian
    34.13 Westlake Settlement Services, LLC, as Sub-Contractor for Aurora Loan Services LLC
    34.14 ZC  Real Estate Tax Solutions Limited, as Sub-Contractor for Option One Mortgage
    Corporation
    34.15 ZC Sterling Insurance Agency, Inc., as Sub-Contractor for Option One Mortgage
    Corporation

    </TABLE>

   (35) Servicer compliance statement.


    <TABLE>

    
       <c>
    35.1 Aurora Loan Services LLC, as Servicer
    35.2 Aurora Loan Services LLC, as Master Servicer
    35.3 Chase Home Finance LLC, as Subservicer for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
    35.4 JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Servicer
    35.5 Option One Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer

    </TABLE>