alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

CHARLES MOLNAR, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

No. 15-50428 

D.C. No. 3:14-cr-01340-JLS 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Janis L. Sammartino, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2017**

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. 

Charles Molnar appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges 

the 188-month concurrent sentences imposed following his guilty-plea convictions

for receipt and possession of material involving the sexual exploitation of minors, 

in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2252(a)(2) and (a)(4)(B). We have jurisdiction under 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 19 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-50428 

28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. 

Molnar contends that the district court erred by increasing his sentence based 

on facts that were not alleged in the indictment nor proven beyond a reasonable 

doubt. This argument fails because the court’s factual findings affected neither the 

statutory maximum sentence nor any mandatory minimum sentence applicable to 

Molnar’s conviction, and, therefore, the Sixth Amendment was not violated. See 

United States v. Vallejos, 742 F.3d 902, 906-07 (9th Cir. 2014).

Molnar next contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable in light 

of the mitigating factors. The district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing 

Molnar’s sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The highend sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)

sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances. See Gall, 552 U.S. at 51. 

Furthermore, the record reflects that the district court considered Molnar’s 

mitigating arguments.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Mike F. Chang, the chief executive officer of Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited (the “Company”), certify for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,





|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|a. | the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|b. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: September 9, 2011





/s/    MIKE F. CHANGMike F. ChangChief Executive Officer
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# PHOTOS ANDVIDEOS

Search

Search

                                - All Images 
                                - Other 
                                - Space Shuttle 

                                - Upload Date
                                - Photo Date
                                - Title

----

Download Image: Full Size (1.57 MB)

Tags:USSPACECOM, Spanish Space Command

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Transportation.

# ACTION:

Notice of Order to Show Cause (Order 2016-1-12); Docket DOT-OST-2015-0095.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Transportation is directing all interested parties to show cause why it should not issue an order finding Elite Airways, LLC fit, willing, and able, and awarding it a certificate of public convenience and necessity to conduct interstate scheduled air transportation of persons, property and mail.

# DATES:

Persons wishing to file objections should do so no later than February 11, 2016.

# ADDRESSES:

Objections and answers to objections should be filed in Docket DOT-OST-2015-0095 and addressed to the U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, (M-30, Room W12-140), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, and should be served upon the parties listed in Attachment A to the order.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Barbara Snoden, Air Carrier Fitness Division (X-56, Room W86-471), U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-4834.

Dated: January 28, 2016.

Susan L. Kurland,

Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2016-02106 Filed 2-3-16; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
Skip to main content

# Social Security

Search
Menu
Español
Sign in

## Cost-Of-Living Adjustment (COLA)

Footer menu
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 323 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 323

               To terminate the Department of Education.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 12, 2021

   Mr. Paul introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
               To terminate the Department of Education.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION.

    The Department of Education shall terminate on December 31, 2021.
                                 <all>
```
#### C. A. ISENHOUR, Administrator of KENNETH E. MICHAEL, *v.*FRANK EFIRD.

(Filed 20 August, 1930.)

Civil actioN for wrongful death, before *Stack, J.,*at October Term, 1929, of Cabarrus.

The plaintiff instituted an action against the defendant for wrongful death resulting from an automobile collision upon'a public highway. Judgment was duly rendered upon the verdict in favor of the plaintiff and the defendant appealed.

*Hartsell <& Hartsell for plaintiff.*

*J ohn M. Bobinson and Hunter M. J ones for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

There was sufficient evidence of negligence to be submitted to the jury.

The evidence as to the earnings of deceased while law librarian at the University of West Virginia was weak and uncertain, but it cannot be said as a matter of law, that the testimony objected to constituted no evidence at all. *Smith v. Coach Line,*191 N. C., 589, 132 S. E., *807567. Certain excerpts are selected from tbe charge of the trial judge which discloses that the words “proximate cause” do not appear, but in the outset the trial judge instructed the jury: “But negligence alone is not sufficient to entitle one to recover. One who claims damages on account of negligence of another must show two propositions by the greater weight of the evidence. . . . First, that the injury or death was caused by the negligence of defendant; secondly, that the particular negligence alleged was the proximate cause of the death and injury, and proximate cause is the real efficient cause without which the injury or death would not have occurred.”

Exceptions were also taken to the instruction of the trial judge to the jury relative to the issue of damages. However, we do not think that such exceptions are of sufficient weight to overthrow the judgment.

No error.
#### Patrick K. Howard v. William Costello.

*Practice—Appeal by One of Several Defendants—Sec.*70, *Act of 1873.*

Where less than the full number of defendants appeal from the decision of a justice, those not appealing must be summoned, or return of not found had, before the case can be disposed of.

[Opinion filed April 3, 1889.]

In error to the Circuit Court of Cook County.

Mr. Edward T. Noonan, for plaintiff in error.

*612Messrs. Keator & Thompson, for defendant in error.

Gary, J.

If one of two or-‘more defendants against whom judgment is entered before a justice takes an appeal alone, the other defendant or defendants must be summoned, or return of not found had, under Sec. 70 of the Act of 1873, concerning justices, before the case can be disposed of. Steinborn v. Thomas, 8 Ill. App. 515; Humphreys v. Rodgers, 9 Ill. App. 281; Walter v. Bierman, 59 Ill. 186; Stewart v. Peters, 33 Ill. 384.

This rule having been disregarded in this cas* the judgment must be reversed and the case remanded for proceedings required by the statute.

*jReversed and remanded.*
3mi Route

S/F
## Top Names Over the Last 100 Years

- Popular Baby names
- Top names by decade
- Top 5 names in each year
- Popular Names by State

The following table shows the 100 most popular given names for male and female    babies born during the last 100 years, 1924-2023.  For each rank and sex,   the table shows the name and the number of occurrences of that name. These time-tested   popular names were taken from a universe that includes 178,720,219 male births   and 173,137,701 female births.

Please note that popular names listed below are not necessarily *consistently* popular 	in every year.  For example, the name James, ranked as the most popular male name over	the last 100 years, has been ranked as low as number 19.  Similarly, the most popular 	female name in the table, Mary, ranked as low as 135.

Footer menu
***U.S. SPACE COMMAND***

***Academic Engagement Enterprise (AEE) Application***

**Please fill out and email form to: usspacecom.j7.j7trngandeduc@us.af.mil**

**Institution:**

Name: Enter Institution name here.

Street Address: Enter Street Address here.

City: Enter City here.

State: AL: Alabama 

Zip code: Enter Zip here.

Website: Enter website here.

Name of Accreditation Agency: Enter accreditation here

**Primary Point of Contact (POC)**

Last Name: Enter last name here.

First Name: Enter first name here.

Title: Enter title here.

Email (edu): Enter edu email only.

Work Phone: Enter work phone # here.

Alternate Phone: Enter alternate phone # here.

**Secondary Point of Contact (POC)**

Last Name: Enter last name here.

First Name: Enter first name here.

Title: Enter last name here.

Email (edu): Enter edu email only.

Work Phone: Enter work phone # here. 

Alternate Phone: Enter alternate phone # here.

**President or Provost** Choose title here. 

Name: Enter name here.

Email (edu): Enter email here.

Work Phone: Enter work phone # here. 

Alternate Phone: Enter alternate phone # here.

**Application Questions**

1. Two-year or four-year institution: Select here. Other Explain: Explain here.

2. Provide three topics for potential guest lecturers/instructors from US Space Command and whether students would be undergrads or graduates.

a. Topic: Enter topic here. Select here.

b. Topic: Enter topic here. Select here.

c. Topic: Enter topic here. Select here.

3. Institution programs

☐Space Studies Choose Level.

☐Computer Science Choose Level.

☐Space security Choose Level.

☐Space International Relations Choose Level.

☐Space Law Choose Level.

☐Space Political Science Choose Level.

☐Space Public Policy Choose Level.

☐Aerospace Engineering Choose Level.

☐Artificial Intelligence Choose Level.

☐Computer Engineering Choose Level.

☐Astronomy Choose Level.

☐Atmospheric Science Choose Level.

☐Data Science Choose Level.

☐Machine Learning Choose Level.

☐Avionics Technology Choose Level.

☐Mechanical Engineering Choose Level.

☐Space Related Other Enter Program Name. Choose Level.

☐Physics Choose Level.

☐Communications Choose Level.

☐Applied Analytics Choose Level.

4. Describe any specialized Space-related programs and degrees not listed above Describe here.

5. Provide the regional/national accreditations for your space-related programs Describe here.

6. Describe any space-related research/instructional areas in which your institution specializes  Describe here.

7. If your membership is accepted, may we use your organizational logo and website on our AEE website?  If so, please provide the logo and the link you would like us to use.  Describe here.
#### ELIZABETH WHITESIDE v. RALSTON PURINA COMPANY and W. JACK FAIRCLOTH.

(Filed 21 September, 1955.)

Appeal and Error § 20—

Where the ease on appeal, settled by agreement of counsel, contains the evidence in question and answer form, rather than in narrative form as required by Rule 19 (4), Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, the judgment will be affirmed and the appeal dismissed.

Winborne and Higgins, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Pless, J.,*at April-May Term, 1955, of HENDERSON.

Civil action to recover for sickness and death of plaintiff’s chickens, alleged to have been caused by the defendants’ negligence and breach of contract in using improper serum in inoculating the chickens to prevent Fowl Pox and New Castle Disease.

The defendants’ motion for judgment of nonsuit, made at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence, was allowed, and from judgment based on such ruling the plaintiff appeals, assigning errors.

*Paul K. Barnwell for plaintiff, appellant.*

*Monroe M. Redden for defendants, appellees.*

JOHNSON, J.

Practically all the evidence in the case is by question and answer, and not in narrative form as required by Rule 19 (4), Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N.C. 544, p. 556.

This Rule provides that the evidence “shall be in narrative form, and not by question and answer, except that a question and answer, or a series of them, may be set out when the subj ect of a particular exception.” Here the instances in which the question and answer form is necessary to point up an exception are nebulous. The Rule further *592provides that “If the case is settled by agreement of counsel, or the statement of the appellant becomes the case on appeal, and the rule is not complied with, . . . the appeal will be dismissed.” Here the case was settled by agreement of counsel.

' The defendants’ motion to dismiss the appeal for failure to narrate the evidence will be allowed. It is so ordered. For the reasons stated in *Anderson v. Heating Co.,*238 N.C. 138, 76 S.E. 2d 458, the Court has not only found it necessary to adopt Rule 19 (4), but also to enforce it uniformly. The profession has been apprised of the mandatory character of the Rule in recent decisions of the Court. *S. v. McNeill,*239 N.C. 679, 80 S.E. 2d 680; *Laughinghouse v. Insurance Co.,*239 N.C. 678, 80 S.E. 2d 457; *S. v. Powell,*238 N.C. 550, 78 S.E. 2d 343; *Anderson v. Heating Co., supra.*See also *Pruitt v. Wood,*199 N.C. 788, 156 S.E. 126.

In accordance with our decisions, the judgment will be affirmed and the appeal dismissed.

Judgment affirmed; appeal dismissed.

WinboRNe and HiggiNS, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 26, 2024

NO. 03

- 24

- 00113

- CV

Monocoque Diversified Interests, LLC , Appellant

v.

InterTex Enterprises, LLC , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 200TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

B EFOR E CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES SMITH AND THEOFANIS

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’ S MOTION

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the o rder signed by the tr i a l court on January 26, 2024

. Appellant has

filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion , the Court agrees that the

motion should be granted . Therefore, the Court grants the motio n and dismiss es the appeal

. The

appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 236 / Friday, December 8, 1995 / Presidential Documents 63391

Memorandum of December 6, 1995

Delegation of Authority Under Section 321(c) of the North

American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act

Memorandum for the United States Trade Representative

By virtue of the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution

and laws of the United States, including section 301 of title 3 of the United

States Code, I hereby delegate to the United States Trade Representative

(USTR) the powers vested in the President by section 321(c) of the North

American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (19 U.S.C. 3391(c))

with respect to the tariff rate quotas for tomatoes.

In carrying out this authority, USTR shall consult with interested agencies,

as well as the National Economic Council and the National Security Council.

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal

[FR Doc. 95–30209

Register

THE WHITE HOUSE,

Washington, December 6, 1995.

.

œ–

Filed 12–7–95; 11:51 am]

Billing code 3190–01–M
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# Academic Engagement Enterprise

# Articles of Interest

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# USSPACECOM launches Academic Engagement Enterprise

By Staff ReportU.S. Space Command

                U.S. MILITARY ACADEMY WEST POINT, New York   –                                              - Grow the capabilities of our future workforce.
                                - Increase space-applied research that enhances our collective understanding of the space environment to then spur innovation that refines our space operations. 
                                - Partner with academic organizations to improve access to space studies and extend an understanding of space to a much larger audience.
                                - Facilitate a more globally-diverse dialogue about space to better represent the shared interests of all nations committed to the responsible uses of space.
**. **Academic Engagement Enterprise (spacecom.mil)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT