alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 22 (Wednesday, February 3, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 5773]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-01904]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. 
The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential 
trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel; NHLBI CLTR SEP Review.
    Date: February 23, 2016.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 
7188, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Chang Sook Kim, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and 
Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7188, Bethesda, MD 
20892-7924, 301-435-0287, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dcbfbdaeb3b0b7b39cb1bdb5b0f2b2b5b4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c9aaa8bba6a5a2a689a4a8a0a5e7a7a0a1">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 28, 2016.
Michelle Trout,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-01904 Filed 2-2-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

EXHIBIT B 

COMPENSATION BY CATEGORY FOR SERVICES RENDERED 

BY DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP FOR THE PERIOD 

JUNE 1, 2019 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2019 

Categories Hours Fees 

2018 NDT Audit Services 14.8 $3,713.00 

2019 Audit Services 865.7 $197,704.00 

California Wildfires 42.4 $28,614.00 

New Accounting Standards 10.2 $4,389.00 

Post Bankruptcy Matters 51.1 $24,573.00 

Preparation of Fee Applications 48.9 $11,472.00 

Fees Category Subtotal : 1,033.1 $270,465.00 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4352-2 Filed: 10/21/19 Entered: 10/21/19 13:55:36 Page 1

of 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7640

ELLIOTT GAINES, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus DOROTHY F. KEA, Registrar of the State Boardof Elections; JANET RENO, United States Attorney General; GEORGE ALLEN, Governor of Virginia; JAMES S. GILMORE, III, Attorney General of Virginia; BRUCE MEADOW, Secretary of State Board of Elections, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States Di strict Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-95-971-AM) Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 4, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed in part and affirmed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion. Elliott Gaines, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. Appellant noted the appeal of the dismissal outside the sixty-day appeal period established by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), failed to obtain an extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day period provided by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), and is not entitled to relief under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The time periods established by Fed. R. App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court entered its order on July 19, 1995; Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on October 9, 1995. Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an exte nsion of the appeal period deprives this court ofjurisdiction to consider the dismissal of his complaint. We therefore dismiss the appeal of the July 19 order. Appellant also appeals the denial of his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gaines v. Kea , No. CA-95-971-AM (E.D. Va. Sept. 13, 1995). We deny Appellant's motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED IN PART, AFFIRMED IN PART
Exhibit 10.28


SOCIEDAD GARESTE LIMITADA


208 VAN BUREN


COPIAPO, CHILE





February 3, 2012





Pacific Copper Corp.


3040 N. Campbell Ave., Suite 110


Tucson, Arizona USA  85718





Re:  Former Pacific Copper properties in Chile





Gentlemen:





Sociedad Gareste Limitada (“Gareste”) is the contractual Operator for Pacific Copper Corp. (“Pacific”) in Chile under the Operator Agreement dated February 12, 2008 with Pacific Copper Chile Ltda., Pacific’s subsidiary in the country of Chile.





As you know, Pacific, due to a lack of funding, has been unable to pay the taxes and other maintenance expenses for most of the mineral concessions owned by Pacific in Atacama Region III, Chile, and subject to the Operator Agreement. As a consequence, many of these properties have “lapsed” and Pacific no longer has legal title to such concessions.





In a large number of these cases, however, Gareste was able to file and “relocate” mining concessions to replace the titles lost by Pacific, as more specifically shown in Exhibit A attached hereto.





This letter is to confirm that the concessions depicted on Exhibit A were relocated by Gareste in trust and for the benefit of Pacific. Further, that PCC is indebted to Gareste in the amount of $ 35,000 for preserving said concessions. The parties will at the appropriate time arrange for the reconveyance of said titles back to Pacific, at which time Pacific will reimburse Gareste for these out of pocket expenses, and further, will grant to Gareste a 2% Net Smelter Return (“NSR”)royalty on production from these concessions, capped at the amount of US$6 million on a per property basis, with repurchase rights in PCC for one-half of the NSR royalty (an undivided 1%), again on a per property basis, for the sum of US$2 million.





If you agree with these matters, please sign where indicated below and return one fully-executed original to the undersigned.





Very truly yours,





SOCIEDAD GARESTE LIMITADA





By: _/s/ Eduardo Esteffan Marco____________


Eduardo Esteffan Marco, Co-Managing Partner





AGREED TO AND ACEPTED THIS 14 day of February, 2012





PACIFIC COPPER CORP.





By: _/s/ David B. Hackman________


Title: President
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



### United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-3100 VIVIAN J. BLAHA,

Petitioner,

v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT,

Respondent. Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in DA0831070068-B-1. ON MOTION
ORDER Vivian J. Blaha moves to reinstate her petition for review and for an extension of time to file her brief. Blaha's petition was dismissed for failure to file a Fed. Cir. R. 15(c) statement concerning discrimination. The statement has now been filed. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motions will be granted, the mandate will be recalled, and the dismissal order will be vacated, if Blaha files her brief within 21 days of the date of this order. FOR THE COURT


### MAR 10 2009 /s/ Jan Horbalv Date Jan Horbaly Clerk orILED U.S. CB OF APPEALS FOR THR EFtAL CIRCUIT cc: Afton Jane Izen, Esq. Matthew H. Solomson, Esq. MAR 1 0 2009 s8
#### Riley Read, Appellant, v. William H. Nichols and others, Respondents.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

Opinion by

Hardin, P. J.
#### F. S. LANGLEY, JR., v. W. F. RUSSELL.

(Filed 25 September, 1940.)

Master and Servant § 7d—

In an action to recover damages for maliciously causing plaintiff’s employer to breach the contract of employment with plaintiff, evidence merely that defendant, as president of the employer, signed the letter advising plaintiff of his discharge, is wholly insufficient to establish the allegation that defendant maliciously procured the employer to breach the alleged contract of employment.

*217Appeal by plaintiff from *Warlich, J.,*at February Term, 1940, of Buncombe.

*W. K. McLean for plaintiff, appellant.*

*Milligan & Haynes and Lee & Lee for defendant, appellee.*

Pee OijRiam.

This is an action to recover damages for maliciously causing the Planters Tobacco Warehouse, Inc., to breach its contract of employment of the plaintiff. From judgment as in case of nonsuit entered when the plaintiff had introduced his evidence and rested his case the plaintiff appealed, assigning error.

While it may be questionable as to whether there was sufficient evidence to be submitted to the jury upon the contract alleged, the evidence is utterly wanting to establish the allegation that the defendant maliciously caused the Planters Tobacco Warehouse, Inc., to breach such contract. The utmost the evidence tends to establish is that the defendant, as president of the warehouse company, signed the letter from the company advising plaintiff of his discharge.

The judgment of the Superior Court is

Affirmed.
Recorded No. Amount Recorded No. Amount

1 2–5 21-17-431-002 Merced 10/25/2019 2019034691 $25,230.72 Pac. Gas & Elec. Co. $25,230.72

2 6–9 21-17-431-003 Madera 10/25/2019 2019025042 $118,038.71 Pac. Gas & Elec. Co. $118,038.71

3 10–15 21-17-431-007 San Joaquin 10/24/2019 2019-121917 $17,122.86 12/9/2019 2019-142806 $1,106.32 Pac. Gas & Elec. Co. $16,016.54

Total: $159,285.97

Against Remaining

Exhibit A - Index of Recorded Liens and Partial Releases

Lien information Release information

Ref. no. Ex. B. pp. Job no(s). County

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5157-1 Filed: 12/18/19 Entered: 12/18/19 08:29:36 Page 1

of 1
**EXHIBIT 31.3**CERTIFICATIONI, Kevin Murphy, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of SteelCloud, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.     Date: March 19, 2007 By: /s/ Kevin Murphy       Name: Kevin Murphy  Title: Chief Financial Officer
23
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 236 (Friday, December 8, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 63121]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30045]








Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

Time and Date: 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, December 13, 1995.

Place: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, C Street 
entrance between 20th and 21st Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

Status: Open.

Matters to be Considered:

Summary Agenda

    Because of its routine nature, no substantive discussion of the 
following item is anticipated. This matter will be voted on without 
discussion unless a member of the Board requests that the item be moved 
to the discussion agenda.

    1. Publication for comment of proposed amendments to Subpart A 
of Regulation S (Reimbursement for Providing Financial Records; 
Recordkeeping Requirements for Certain Financial Records) regarding 
reimbursement of certain costs incurred by financial institutions.

Discussion Agenda

    2. Proposed policy statement describing how interest rate risk 
will be measured and evaluated for supervisory purposes (proposed 
earlier for public comment; Docket No. R-0802).
    3. Proposed 1996 Federal Reserve Bank budgets.
    4. Cost of Federal Reserve notes in 1996.
    5. Any items carried forward from a previously announced 
meeting.

    Note: This meeting will be recorded for the benefit of those 
unable to attend. Cassettes will be available for listening in the 
Board's Freedom of Information Office, and copies may be ordered for 
$5 per cassette by calling (202) 452-3684 or by writing to:

Freedom of Information Office, Board of Governors of the Federal 
    Reserve System, Washington, D.C. 20551.

Contact Person for More Information: Mr. Joseph R. Coyne, Assistant to 
the Board; (202) 452-3204.

    Dated: December 6, 1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 95-30045 Filed 12-6-95; 10:39 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Donald M. Muir, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Lionbridge Technologies, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for theregistrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared; 

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles; 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: August 11, 2008 

 

 

1
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #14599 and #14600]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of Connecticut dated 01/21/2016. *Incident:*
                         Condominium Complex Fire. *Incident Period:*
                         12/31/2015. *Effective Date:*
                         01/21/2016. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         03/21/2016. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         10/21/2016.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Fairfield. *Contiguous Counties:* Connecticut: Litchfield, New Haven. New York: Dutchess, Putnam, Westchester. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
3.625Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.813Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
6.000Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 14599 5 and for economic injury is 14600 0. The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are Connecticut, New York. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Dated: January 21, 2016. Maria Contreras-Sweet, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2016-01881 Filed 2-1-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit 10.1






Exhibit 10.1




AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT



This AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”), dated as of May 27, 2009, amends
that certain employment agreement, dated July 25, 2008 (the “Employment Agreement”), between Paper
Magic Group, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation (“PMG”), and Paul Quick (“Executive”).



WHEREAS, PMG and the Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement to extend relocation
expense reimbursement relating to the Executive’s Current Primary Residence (as such term is
defined in the Employment Agreement);



NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein and
for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged,
the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, agree as follows:



1. Amendment of the Second Paragraph of Section 3. The parties acknowledge and agree
that the second paragraph of Section 3 of the Employment Agreement shall be amended by adding the
following sentence as a new fourth sentence:




Further, in addition to the foregoing relocation expense reimbursement, until the earlier of
(a) February 1, 2010 or (b) the date upon which you complete the sale of your Current
Primary Residence, you will be eligible to be reimbursed for routine, ordinary course
expenses approved in advance by us, up to a maximum aggregate monthly amount of $2,712.50,
associated with your ownership of the Current Primary Residence, including without
limitation approved mortgage, utility and routine maintenance expenses.



2. Miscellaneous. Except as expressly modified hereby, the Employment Agreement
remains in full force and effect. Upon the execution and delivery hereof, the Employment Agreement
shall thereupon be deemed to be amended as hereinabove set forth, and this Amendment and the
Employment Agreement shall henceforth be read, taken and construed as one and the same instrument.
This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be considered an original
instrument, but all of which shall be considered one and the same agreement, and shall become
binding when one or more counterparts have been signed by each of the parties hereto and delivered
to the other party.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed by PMG and by the Executive as of the date
first above written.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	PAPER MAGIC GROUP, INC. (“PMG”)	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 

Christopher J. Munyan

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Paul Quick (“Executive”)