alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report of Casey Container, Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Terry W. Neild,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Terry W. Neild
------------------------------------
Terry W. Neild
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
April 12, 2010

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
10.2

    


    STONERIDGE,
INC.

    LONG-TERM
INCENTIVE PLAN

    AMENDMENT
TO

    RESTRICTED
SHARES GRANT AGREEMENT

     

    Recitals

     

    1.           Stoneridge,
Inc., an Ohio corporation (the “Company”) and _______________ (“Grantee”) are
parties to a Restricted Shares Grant Agreement dated March 2, 2008 (the
“RSGA”).

     

    2.           Pursuant
to the pursuant to the terms and conditions RSGA the Grantee was granted Common
Shares, without par value, of the Company (the “Restricted
Shares”).

     

    3.           The
grant of Restricted Shares under the RSGA was comprised of two separate mutually
exclusive parts, Award I (time-based restricted shares) and Award II
(performance-based restricted shares).

     

    4.           In
the event of a Change in Control the Award II Restricted Shares conditioned the
lapse of the risk of forfeiture (vesting) on the price of the Company’s Common
Shares, calculated by the average of the closing price of the Common Shares for
the ten trading days immediately preceding the date of the Change in Control,
being equal to or greater than $6.05 per share.

     

    5.           The
$6.05 price floor condition in the event of a Change in Control was a holdover
in the form of grant agreement from a prior year and Compensation Committee has
determined that it should not be applied to awards of restricted common shares
made in 2008.

     

    Amendment

     

    The RSGA is hereby amended by deleting
subsection 5(b) in its entirety and replacing it with the
following:

     

    “5(b)        a
Change in Control of the Company (as defined in the Plan); subject to the
proviso below, or”

     

    The
remainder of the RSGA shall remain unchanged.

    IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused its corporate name to be subscribed by
its duly authorized officer as of the 3rd day of May, 2009.

     

    
      
        
          
            	 
      	 
      	
                    STONERIDGE,
      INC.

                  
	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      	
                    By

                  	
                      

                  
	 
      	 
      	 
      	
                    John
      Corey

                  
	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
                    The
      foregoing is hereby accepted.

                  	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
                      

                  	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
                    (Signature)
#### In the Matter of the Will of MOLLIE A. WALL.

(Filed 13 December, 1939.)

Appeal of propounder from *Grady, Emergency Judge,*at April Term, 1939, of Guilford.

No error.

*Henry B. Stanley for propounder, appellant.*

*Glidewell & Glidewell and Sapp & Sapp for caveator, appellee.*

Per Curiam.

Tbe testatrix married A. N. Wall, a widower with four children, and subsequently a child was born to this union. After her death a paper-writing purporting to be her last will and testament was probated in common form as a holograph will. It appeared that the will originally devised the real estate of the testatrix to her husband, A. N. Wall, if living, with the remainder over to his 4 children. When the paper was submitted for probate, it appeared that the figure “4” had been erased and the figure “5” written over it. The significant controversy at the trial was as to whether this figure “5” was in the handwriting of the supposed testatrix. It was agreed that the will, with the original figure “4” in it, was written prior to the birth of this child.

If the will could not be sustained as entirely in the handwriting of the testatrix and containing provision for this child, the latter, under the law, would inherit the' whole property as if no will had been made, since the 4 children of the husband were not of the blood of the testatrix. C. S., 4169; C. S., 1654. It ivas the contention of the caveator that the will had been altered without consent of the testatrix, and that the figure “5” was not in her handwriting.

There was no objection to the mode of trial or to the form of the issue submitted. Upon a stipulation between the parties an issue was submitted as to whether or not the figure “5” was in the handwriting of the supposed testatrix, and the jury answered the issue “No,” whereupon, judgment was rendered against the will, and from this the propounder appealed.

Closely examining the exceptive assignments of error, we are unable to see that they raise any question of law which might aid the propounder.

*We*find

No error.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5419 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5419

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 17 (legislative day, September 16), 2014

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for a right to an 
administrative appeal relating to adverse determinations of tax-exempt 
                    status of certain organizations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL RELATING TO ADVERSE DETERMINATIONS OF 
              TAX-EXEMPT STATUS OF CERTAIN ORGANIZATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 7123 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) Administrative Appeal Relating to Adverse Determination of 
Tax-Exempt Status of Certain Organizations.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary shall prescribe procedures 
        under which an organization described in section 501(c) may 
        request an administrative appeal (including a conference 
        relating to such appeal if requested by the organization) to 
        the Internal Revenue Service Office of Appeals of an adverse 
        determination described in paragraph (2).
            ``(2) Adverse determinations.--For purposes of paragraph 
        (1), an adverse determination is described in this paragraph if 
        such determination is adverse to an organization with respect 
        to--
                    ``(A) the initial qualification or continuing 
                qualification of the organization as exempt from tax 
                under section 501(a) or as an organization described in 
                section 170(c)(2),
                    ``(B) the initial classification or continuing 
                classification of the organization as a private 
                foundation under 509(a), or
                    ``(C) the initial classification or continuing 
                classification of the organization as a private 
                operating foundation under section 4942(j)(3).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to determinations made after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 16, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members         
    -  AEE Multimedia         
    -  AEE Research Library 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# PHOTOS ANDVIDEOS

Search

Search

                                - All Images 
                                - Other 
                                - Space Shuttle 

                                - Upload Date
                                - Photo Date
                                - Title

----

Download Image: Full Size (5.2 MB)

Tags:Space Command, Change of Command, CoC, USSPACECOM, Spacecom

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Exhibit 32.1
   (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
 /s/ LEWIS W. DICKEY, JR.Name:
    Lewis W. Dickey, Jr.Title:
    Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ MARTIN R. GAUSVIKName:
    Martin R. GausvikTitle:
    Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 24, 2021. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, February 24, 2021 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A21D0203. BRIAN GRANGER v. GEORGIA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: SUCV2020000477
a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b.
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;c.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andd.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: July 30, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Joseph P. HannanJoseph P. HannanSenior Vice President, Treasurer and 
Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 238 (Tuesday, December 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63709-63710]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30180]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. TQ96-1-35-000]


West Texas Gas, Inc.; Notice of Filing

December 6, 1995.
    Take notice that on December 1, 1995, West Texas Gas, Inc. (WTG) 
filed Seventeenth Revised Sheet No. 4 to its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1, proposed to be effective January 1, 1996. WNG 
states that this tariff sheet and the accompanying explanatory 
schedules constitute WTG's quarterly PGA filing submitted in accordance 
with the Commission's purchased gas adjustments regulations.
    WTG states that copies of the filing were served upon WTG's 
customers and interested state commissions.
    Any persons desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211 

[[Page 63710]]
and 385.214. Pursuant to Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
regulations, all such motion or protests must be filed not later than 
12 days after the date of filing noted above. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make the protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-30180 Filed 12-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Denise J. McNamara, Appellant, v County of Monroe et al., Respondents.

Submitted January 8, 1996;

decided April 4, 1996

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed Supreme Court’s order denying plaintiffs cross motion to amend the complaint, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
#### Emory A. Chase and others, Appellants, v. William Belden, Respondent.

— Judgment affirmed, with costs.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Wells Real Estate Fund I (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells,
III, Chief Executive Officer of the corporate General Partner of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|                                                           
|/s/    LEO F. WELLS, III                                   
|                                                           
|Leo F. Wells, III Chief
Executive Officer November 10, 2003



|                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                             
|/s/     DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS                                  
|                                                             
|Douglas P. Williams Chief
Financial Officer November 10, 2003
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 22

- 00083

- CV

Caddo Mills Independent School District and Mike Morath, Commissioner of Education , Appellant s

v.
Steven Sumrow , Appellee

FROM THE 200TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D

- 1

- G N

- 20

- 001907 , THE HONORABLE AMY CLARK MEACHUM , JUDGE PRESIDING

C O N C U R R I N G O P I N I O N

I agree with the Court ’ s analysis and its conclusion that the language of the

contract requires us to affi rm the Commissioner ’ s order

. I write separatel y to express my view
tha t the school district ’ s abrupt change in its course of dealing with an e ducat o r who had be en employed by the district for 15 years in the same position , absent any cause , is the type of unfair surprise that borders on being uncons ci onable

. While there may be legitimate reasons justifying
th e inclusion of the term allowing reassignment, the school district ’ s execution of the reassignment here , which it attempted to justif y by requiring a n additional c ertification that had not previou sly been required, is disturbing.

__________________________________________ Gi sela D. Triana , Ju stice2 Before Justices Ba ker, Triana, and Jones
F iled: July 12, 2023
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary

                    Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity  and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under subpart B (formerly subpart Q) during the Week Ending May 22, 2010. The following Applications for  Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier  Permits were filed under subpart B (formerly subpart Q) of the Department  of Transportation's Procedural Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201*et seq.*). The due date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify  Scope are set forth below for each application. Following the Answer period  DOT may process the application by expedited procedures. Such procedures  may consist of the adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in  appropriate cases a final order without further proceedings.                

*Docket Number:*                     DOT-OST-2010-0126.                

*Date Filed:*                     May 18, 2010.                

*Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion To Modify Scope:*                     June 8, 2010.                

*Description:*                     Application of Carlsbad-Palomar Airlines, Inc. requesting a certificate of public convenience and necessity to engage in scheduled interstate air transportation of persons, property and cargo.                

 Renee V. Wright,

Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. 2010-13656 Filed 6-7-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P