alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Supplemental Agreement No. 1 to Management Service Contract



 Exhibit 10.4 
 SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT No 1 TO THE MANAGEMENT SERVICE 
 CONTRACT FOR MANAGEMENT BOARD MEMBERS 

 between 
 Stowe Woodward AG 

Am Langen Graben 22, 52353 Düren, represented by its Supervisory Board, in turn 
 represented by its chairman, Stephen R. Light (hereinafter the “Company”) 
 and 

Mr. Peter Williamson 
 Bismarckstraße 3,
69198 Schriesheim (hereinafter the “Management Board Member”) 
 dated March 12, 2008. 
  

	 	1.	In addition to the position as member of the management board of the Company, it is intended to appoint the Management Board Member also as Managing Director
(“Geschäftsführer”) of Xerium Germany Holding GmbH as well as of Xerium Technologies Limited UK. The Management Board Member’s annual base salary as specified under section 3.1 of the Management Service Contract for
Management Board Members shall cover all additional activities in connection with these positions, and it is agreed that no additional remuneration shall be paid. 

  

	 	2.	All other provisions of the Management Service Contract for Management Board Member remain unchanged and unaffected. 

  

									
	 The Company,
 represented by:
 Stephen R. Light, Chairman
 of the Supervisory Board
	 		  	 Management Board Member

	 		  		  	
					
	 Place, Date:
	 	 Raleigh, North Carolina, U.S.A,
 June 10, 2009
	 		  	Place, Date:	  	Düren, June 10, 2009
					
	 Signature: 
	 	 /s/ Stephen R. Light
	 		  	Signature: 	  	 /s/ Peter Williamson
SC-COS 22 May 2019 

MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION 

SUBJECT: Policy Memorandum 02-19, USSOUTHCOM Impact and On-The-Spot Awards 

1. The Commander of USSOUTHCOM has implemented a new program recognizing both 

 to be treated 

as an recognition awards where recipients will be granted time off for superior performance 

for a single contribution or accomplishment. Individuals who receive the award will process 

as follows: 

a. Military members receive and are entitled to a 1-day pass to be 

taken at a time coordinated with their respective supervisors and work sections. Military 

members must also comply with any administrative requirements imposed by Service 

regulations. 

 b. Civilian employees receive an 8 hour time-off award (TOA) from duty, without loss of 

pay or charge to ordinary leave. Time-off award recommendations for Department of Army 

(DA) civilians, are required to be initiated by the employee s respective supervisor through 

the Incentive Award Nomination And Approval Form (DA FORM 1256), approved by the 

Director/Deputy Director and submitted to the employee s Civilian Personnel Office for 

processing. TOA nominations for Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) employees are 

submitted by the supervisor on the JWICS . The nominator would 

select and route to the appropriate approving authority. The TOA must be reflected on the 

employee for DA and DIA employees before it is used. All 

TOAs have to be used within 1 year after the effective date of the award. 

2. This policy applies to all military and civilian employees in the HQ, SCOs and JTFs. 

3. My POC for this memo is SCJ1, Col Brian Lewis at DSN 567-1117. 

 PATRICIA M. ANSLOW 

 Major General, US Army 

 Chief of Staff 

DISTRIBUTION: 

D 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

UNITED STATES SOUTHERN COMMAND 

9301 NW 33RD STREET 

DORAL, FL 33172-1202
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4544 Filed: 11/01/19 Entered: 11/01/19 12:19:12 Page 1 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4544 Filed: 11/01/19 Entered: 11/01/19 12:19:12 Page 2 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4544 Filed: 11/01/19 Entered: 11/01/19 12:19:12 Page 3 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4544 Filed: 11/01/19 Entered: 11/01/19 12:19:12 Page 4 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4544 Filed: 11/01/19 Entered: 11/01/19 12:19:12 Page 5 of

5
#### DELIA POOLE v. MARY BRASWELL and MARION WILSON.

(Filed 29 September, 1954.)

Appeal by defendant Marion Wilson from *Paul, Special Judge,*May Term, 1954, of Halifax.

Civil action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained in a collision between tbe automobiles of the defendants on 9 March, 1953, at the intersection of State Highway 301 and Whitaker Street in the town of Enfield.

The plaintiff, a guest passenger in the automobile of defendant Wilson, alleges in her complaint that her injuries were proximately caused by the joint and concurrent negligence of the defendants.

The appellant demurred to the complaint for that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against her, it appearing upon the face of the complaint: (1) That the sole proximate cause of the motor vehicle collision in question was the negligence of the defendant Braswell in driving her car into the intersection against a red traffic light; and (2) that if the defendant Wilson was guilty of any negligence, the same was insulated and rendered inoperative by the negligence of her eodefendant.

His Honor overruled the demurrer and the defendant Wilson appeals, assigning error.

*Battle, Winslow <& Merrell for plaintiff, appellee.*

*A. J. Fletcher, F. T. Dupree, Jr., and G. Farl Weaver for defendant, appellant.*

Per Curiam.

The complaint filed in this action is not as clear and unequivocal in some of its pertinent allegations as it might be. Nevertheless, when all its allegations are considered, as they must be on demurrer, we are led to the conclusion that it is sufficient to withstand the demurrer interposed by the appellant.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 244 (Wednesday, December 20, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65665-65666]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30898]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[WY-989-1050-00-P]


Filing of Plats of Survey; Wyoming

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The plats of survey of the following described lands are 
scheduled 

[[Page 65666]]
to be officially filed in the Wyoming State Office, Cheyenne, Wyoming, 
thirty (30) calendar days from the date of this publication.

Sixth Principal Meridian, Wyoming

T. 19 N., R. 105 W., accepted December 12, 1995

    If protests against a survey, as shown on any of the above plats, 
are received prior to the official filing, the filing will be stayed 
pending consideration of the protest(s) and or appeal(s). A plat will 
not be officially filed until after disposition of protest(s) and or 
appeal(s). These plats will be placed in the open files of the Wyoming 
State Office, Bureau of Land Management, 5353 Yellowstone Road, 
Cheyenne, Wyoming, and will be available to the public as a matter of 
information only. Copies of the plats will be made available upon 
request and prepayment of the reproduction fee of $1.10 per copy.
    A person or party who wishes to protest a survey must file with the 
State Director, Bureau of Land Management, Cheyenne, Wyoming, a notice 
of protest prior to thirty (30) calendar days from the date of this 
publication. If the protest notice did not include a statement of 
reasons for the protest, the protestant shall file such a statement 
with the State Director within thirty (30) calendar days after the 
notice of protest was filed.
    The above-listed plats represent dependent resurveys, subdivision 
of sections.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, P.O. Box 
1828, 5353 Yellowstone Road, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82003.

    Dated: December 12, 1995.
John P. Lee,
Chief, Cadastral Survey Group.
[FR Doc. 95-30898 Filed 12-19-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-M
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*John H. Jeffers v. Same Defendant.

Order dismissing relators reversed, with ten dollars costs in each appeal. Opinion by

Dykman, J.
#### MARVIN WADE COMPANY v. H. V. STEWART.

(Filed 23 September, 1925.)

Appeal by defendant from *Bond, J.,*at Lillington, N. C., 18 May, 1925, from HarNett.

Motion of defendant to set aside judgment, rendered in this cause at the March Special Term, 1925, on the ground that said judgment was taken, not only irregularly, but also through surprise and excusáble neglect. Motion denied and defendant appeals.

*0. G. Barker and Clifford & Townsend for plaintiff.*

*C. L. Guy and H. L. Godwin for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

The defendant failed to make good his allegation that the judgment, rendered in this cause, had been taken through surprise or excusable neglect. The judge finds the contrary to be true. It is also found as a fact that the defendant has no meritorious defense to the plaintiff’s suit. Hence, the motion was properly denied on both grounds. *Livestock Co. v. Atkinson,*189 N. C., 250; *Duffer v. Brunson,*188 N. C., 789; *Bartholomew v. Parrish, ante,*151.

Affirmed.
| Skip to contentSocial Security Online | Actuarial Publications |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|

| www.socialsecurity.gov | Home  FAQs  Contact Us  Search | **Search**  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| Office of the Chief Actuary | The 2009 OASDI Trustees Report5/12/2009    Historical document   |
|-----------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-50991

Summary Calendar

 

DAVID M. MOORE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO; ET AL.,

Defendants,

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-97-CV-500

- - - - - - - - - -

July 1, 1999

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

David Moore appeals the summary judgment dismissal of his

action against the City of San Antonio (“the City”) for its

alleged violation of both his constitutional right to free speech

and a state whistleblower statute. Moore contends that the

district court erred in denying his motions for extension of time

to respond to the City’s summary judgment motion. 
No.98-50991 

-2-

Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b), a court may, under certain

circumstances, extend the period in which an act is required or

allowed to be done. If an enlargement of time is requested

before the expiration of the original period or a previous

extension thereof, the court may grant the enlargement “for cause

shown.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1). However, if a motion for

extension is filed after the expiration of the specified period,

the court may grant the extension only if the failure to act

resulted from “excusable neglect.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(2).

Moore asserts that he failed to timely file his summary

judgment response because his counsel made the tactical decision

that Moore should refrain from responding to the City’s summary

judgment motion until the district court ruled on the City’s

motion to substitute the cover sheet of its summary judgment

motion. Because Moore has shown neither cause nor excusable

neglect for the late filing of his summary judgment response, the

district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Moore’s

motions for extension of time. See Lujan v. National Wildlife

Federation, 497 U.S. 871, 895-97 (1990); Slaughter v. Southern

Talc Co., 919 F.2d 304, 308 (5th Cir. 1990). 

AFFIRMED.
Order entered July 31, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00102-CV

ESTATE OF FREDERIC B. ASCHE, JR., DECEASED 

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. PR-11-3533-2

ORDER

The Court GRANTS cross-appellants’ July 30, 2015 motion to extend time to file their 

cross-appellants’ brief. We ORDER the cross-appellants’ brief filed by AUGUST 31, 2015.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 240 (Thursday, December 14, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 64128]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30468]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 675

[Docket No. 950206040-5040-01; I.D. 120895B]


Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Area; Pacific 
Cod by Vessels Using Hook-and-Line Gear in the Bering Sea and Aleutian 
Islands

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Closure.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS is prohibiting directed fishing for Pacific cod by 
vessels using hook-and-line gear in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands 
management area (BSAI). This action is necessary because the 1995 
prohibited species bycatch mortality allowance of Pacific halibut 
specified for the Pacific cod hook-and-line fishery in the BSAI has 
been reached.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 12 noon, Alaska local time (A.l.t.), December 11, 1995, 
until 12 midnight, A.l.t., December 31, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Furuness, 907-586-7228.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The groundfish fishery in the BSAI exclusive 
economic zone is managed by NMFS according to the Fishery Management 
Plan for the Groundfish Fishery of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands 
Area (FMP) prepared by the North Pacific Fishery Management Council 
under authority of the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management 
Act. Fishing by U.S. vessels is governed by regulations implementing 
the FMP at 50 CFR parts 620 and 675.
    The 1995 Pacific halibut bycatch mortality allowance for the hook-
and-line Pacific cod fishery, which is defined at 
Sec. 675.21(b)(2)(ii)(A), is 725 metric tons (60 FR 8479, February 14, 
1995).
    The Director, Alaska Region, NMFS, has determined, in accordance 
with Sec. 675.21(d), that the Pacific halibut bycatch mortality 
allowance for the Pacific cod hook-and-line fishery in the BSAI has 
been reached. Therefore, NMFS is prohibiting directed fishing for 
Pacific cod by vessels using hook-and-line gear in the BSAI.
    Maximum retainable bycatch amounts for applicable gear types may be 
found in the regulations at Sec. 675.20(h).

Classification

    This action is taken under Sec. 675.20 and is exempt review under 
E.O. 12866.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: December 8, 1995.
Richard W. Surdi,
Acting Director, Office of Fisheries Conservation and Management, 
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 95-30468 Filed 12-11-95; 12:34 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 105 (Wednesday, June 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 30808]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13277]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 12628-002-IA]


The City of Nashua, Iowa; Notice of Availability of Environmental 
Assessment

May 26, 2010.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's regulations, 18 CFR part 
380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office of Energy Projects has 
reviewed the application for an original license for the Cedar Lake Dam 
Hydroelectric Project, to be located on the Cedar River, within the 
City of Nashua, Chickasaw County, Iowa, and has prepared an 
Environmental Assessment (EA). In the EA, Commission staff analyze the 
potential environmental effects of licensing the project and conclude 
that issuing a license for the project, with appropriate environmental 
measures, would not constitute a major Federal action significantly 
affecting the quality of the human environment.
    A copy of the EA is on file with the Commission and is available 
for public inspection. The EA may also be viewed on the Commission's 
Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the 
docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number 
field to access documents. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support 
at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#35737067767a5b595c5b50664045455a474175535047561b525a43"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="aceae9feefe3c2c0c5c2c9ffd9dcdcc3ded8eccac9decf82cbc3da">[email protected]</span></a> or toll-free at 1-866-208-3676, or for 
TTY, (202) 502-8659. You may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via e-mail of 
new filings and issuances related to this or other pending projects. 
For assistance, contact FERC Online Support.
    Any comments should be filed within 30 days from the issuance date 
of this notice, and should be addressed to the Secretary, Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Room 1-A, 
Washington, DC 20426. Please affix ``Cedar Lake Dam Hydroelectric 
Project No. 12628-002'' to all comments. Comments may be filed 
electronically via Internet in lieu of paper. The Commission strongly 
encourages electronic filings. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's Web site under the ``eFiling'' link. 
For further information, contact Michael Watts at (202) 502-6123.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-13277 Filed 6-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# PHOTOS ANDVIDEOS

Search

Search

                                - All Images 
                                - Other 
                                - Space Shuttle 

                                - Upload Date
                                - Photo Date
                                - Title

-  FIRST 
-   
-   
- 1
- 2
- 3 (current)
- 4
- 5
-   
-   
-  LAST
#### CLYDE HENRY HERNDON v. T. A. MELTON.

(Filed 19 November, 1958.)

Libel and Slander § 7b—

An official report by an investigator of a churcb, published in the official organ of the church, is qualifiedly .privileged, and in the absence of evidence of express or actual malice, nonsuit' is proper.

Parker, J., not sitting.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Olive, J.,*at April 8, 1958, Civil Term of RANDOLPH.

Civil action to recover for alleged libelous article written by defendant, who was chairman of the Board of Foreign Missions of the Pentecostal Holiness Church, to be published in the “Pentecostal Holiness Advocate”, the official organ of the Pentecostal Holiness Church, published and circulated to the entire church both clergy and laity, with circulation of several thousand copies.

The article, of which complaint is made, is set forth in the complaint and purports to be a report by defendant of conditions in Hong Kong in the missionary work of the Pentecostal Holiness Church, under plaintiff. While no names are called, plaintiff alleges that by *innuendo*he is named, it being specifically stated that there has been a rift in the church’s work there, etc., to his great damage.

Defendant, answering, admits the publication, but avers that the report of his investigation in the church’s work of Hong Kong was official, and that the publication is privileged.

Upon trial in Superior Court motion of defendant entered at close of plaintiff’s evidence for judgment as of nonsuit was allowed, and to judgment in accordance therewith plaintiff excepts and appeals to the Supreme Court, and assigns error.

*Ottway Burton, Don Davis for plaintiff, appellant.*

*L. P. McLendon, C. T. Leonard, Jr., Richard S. Clark for defendant, appellee.*

PeR CuRiam.

Upon consideration of the evidence offered by plaintiff in the light of his pleading it is clear that the alleged libelous article was written by defendant as a report of his investigation on visit to the Hong Kong Mission of the Pentecostal Holiness Church pursuant to directive of the church. Thus the rule of qualified privilege is applicable. And there being no evidence of express or actual malice, the judgment as of nonsuit is deemed proper. See *Gattis v. Kilgo,*128 N.C. 402, 38 S.E. 931; s. c. 140 N.C. 106, 52 S.E. 249.

Affirmed.

PARKER, J., not sitting.
#### Frank Landers v. The Watertown Fire Insurance Company.

Reargument ordered in the Fifth Judicial Department.

Memorandum filed with the clerk of Oneida county.

Hardin, P. J., not sitting.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7566]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3031]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Freight Forwarder License Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission applications for licenses as ocean 
freight forwarders pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 
(46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR part 510).
    Persons knowing of any reason why any of the following applicants 
should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Freight Forwarders, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573.

Jet Logistics International Inc., 4232 Artesia Blvd., Torrance, CA 
90504-3100, Officers: Sandra L. Rowe, President, David Rowe, Vice 
President
Amerstar Shipping Incorporated, Varet & Fink P.C., New York, NY 
10005-2899, Officers: Belford Saltos, President, Madukwe E. Ukaegbu, 
Secretary
Romi's Express, Inc., 420 S. Hindry Ave., Unit F, Inglewood, CA 
90301, Officers: Rosalba Gil, President, Isabel C. Montego, Vice 
President.

    Dated: February 2, 1995.

    By the Federal Maritime Commission.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-3031 Filed 2-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M