alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-2034

MUZIO B. ROBERTO; MARY K. ROBERTO,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

ROSALYN BELL, Circuit Court Judge, Montgomery

County, Maryland; VINCENT FERRETTI, Circuit

Court Judge, Montgomery County, Maryland; ANN

HARRINGTON, Circuit Court Judge, Montgomery

County, Maryland; PAUL WEINSTEIN, Circuit

Court Judge, Montgomery County, Maryland;

LOUISE SCRIVNER, Circuit Court Judge, Montgomery County, Maryland,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.

(CA-00-1438-AW)

Submitted: February 21, 2002 Decided: March 4, 2002

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Muzio B. Roberto, Mary K. Roberto, Appellants Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Muzio B. Roberto and Mary K. Roberto appeal from the district

court’s order denying their motion to reconsider a prior order

dismissing their civil action against several Maryland state court

judges. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. Roberto v. Bell, No. CA-00-1438-

AW (D. Md. July 12, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 564 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 564

   To amend title V of the Social Security Act to extend funding for 
    family-to-family health information centers to help families of 
 children with disabilities or special health care needs make informed 
             choices about health care for their children.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2013

 Mr. Pallone introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title V of the Social Security Act to extend funding for 
    family-to-family health information centers to help families of 
 children with disabilities or special health care needs make informed 
             choices about health care for their children.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Access to Health Information Centers 
for Families with Disabilities Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF FUNDING FOR FAMILY-TO-FAMILY HEALTH INFORMATION 
              CENTERS.

    Section 501(c)(1)(A)(iii) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
701(c)(1)(A)(iii)), as amended by section 624 of the American Taxpayer 
Relief Act of 2012, is amended by striking ``2013'' and inserting 
``2016''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

JOSEPH AND APRIL PARR, HUSBAND AND WIFE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PARENTS AND NATURAL GUARDIANS OF SAMANTHA PARR, Petitioners

v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, MCCAFFERTY FORD SALES, INC., D/B/A MCCAFFERTY AUTO GROUP, MCCAFFERTY FORD OF MECHANICSBURG, INC., AND MCCAFFERTY FORD COMPANY, Respondents : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 46 EAL 2015 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 27th day of May, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED

.
Retention Arrangement between Terrence A. Duffy and CME Group Inc



 Exhibit 10.1 
 The following is a description of the retention payment arrangement between Terrence A. Duffy and CME Group Inc. 
 On May 14, 2009, the
Governance Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of CME Group Inc. (the “Company”) recommended to the Board and the Board approved an extension of Terrence A. Duffy’s term as Executive Chairman. In accordance
with the Company’s bylaws, as amended and restated, Mr. Duffy will serve as the Executive Chairman until the 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, subject to his reelection to the Board at the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

 The Board also approved a modification to Mr. Duffy’s existing retention payment to incorporate the extension of his term. Mr. Duffy will
be entitled to a retention payment equal to his current base salary if (i) he is not nominated for reelection to the Board at the 2010 Annual Meeting, or at the end of his current term at the 2013 Annual Meeting or any subsequent term, he is
willing and able to serve as Executive Chairman and he is not nominated for reelection to the Board and/or is not reelected to the position of Executive Chairman, if he is eligible, or (ii) prior to the 2013 Annual Meeting, he is no longer able
to serve as Executive Chairman resulting from certain regulatory developments unrelated to his performance. In no event shall Mr. Duffy be entitled to the retention payment if he has been removed or not reelected because of his breach of
fiduciary duty to the shareholders or because of his willful failure to fulfill his duties and obligations as Executive Chairman, all as determined by a majority of the independent, non-industry directors of the Board. 
 The retention payment will be paid no later than 30 days after the event triggering the payment.
EX-35.3
(logo) SUNTRUST



Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
Attention: BAFC 2007-2


Re: Annual Compliance Statement for BAFC 2007-2

In connection with the loans serviced by SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. (the "Company")
pursuant to the Company's Servicing Agreement(s)/Purchase and Sale Agreement(s)
with Bank of America, National Association and any applicable Reconstitution
Agreement(s) (together, the "Transaction Agreements"), I, the undersigned
officer, hereby certify the following as of December 31, 2007:

(i)  The Company conducted a review of its activities during the immediately
     preceding calendar year (or applicable portion thereof) and of its
     performance under the Transaction Agreements during such period has been
     made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has
     fulfilled all of its obligations under the Transaction Agreements in all
     material respects throughout such calendar year (or applicable portion
     thereof), except as follows:

   * SunTrust Mortgage did not maintain the required fidelity bond coverage
     amount in accordance with Section 229.1122(d)(i)(iv) at all times during
     2007. The Company maintained fidelity bond coverage in the amount of
     $150MM throughout calendar year 2007, which was determined to be
     insufficient according to applicable FNMA transaction agreement terms.
     This deficiency was an issue for limited portions of the year and resulted
     from an increase in the volume of the servicing portfolio. SunTrust
     Mortgage has requested a waiver from FNMA stating this coverage amount is
     adequate without regard for the size of the residential servicing
     portfolio, subject to an annual FNMA review. FNMA has verbally agreed to
     this request, and SunTrust Mortgage is working to formalize this
     agreement.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I do hereby certify the foregoing as of the date hereof.



/s/ John R. Purcell, Jr.
John R. Purcell, Jr.
Senior Vice President - Manager, Servicing Division

Date:   March 12, 2008
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 2, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00539

- CV

IN RE Roberto Carlos MENDIVES , Sr.

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

On August 24, 2016, R elator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has

considered the petition and is of the opinion that Relator is not entitled to the relief sought.

Accordingly, the petitio n for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a). The

court’s opinion will issue at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on September 2, 2016

.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justi ce

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 2nd day of September, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle , Clerk

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2015

- CI

- 00877, styled I n the Matter of the Marriage of A ngela Rose

Mendives and R oberto Carlos Mendives, Sr., and in the in terest of R.C.M. II, M.A.M., G.F .M., and E.F.M.,

Children , pending in the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr.

presiding.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 241 (Friday, December 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64454-64455]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30595]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 64455]]


DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-31,669]


ARCO Corporation Dallas, Texas; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on December 4, 1995 in response to a worker petition 
which was filed November 6, 1995 on behalf of workers at ARCO 
Corporation, Dallas, Texas (TA-W-31,669).
    The petitioning group of workers are covered under an existing 
Trade Adjustment Assistance certification (TA-W-29,431). Consequently, 
further investigation in this case would service no purpose, and the 
investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, D.C., this 4th day of December 1995.
Russell T. Kile,
Acting Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-30595 Filed 12-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members         
    -  AEE Multimedia 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# PHOTOS ANDVIDEOS

Search

Search

                                - All Images 
                                - Other 
                                - Space Shuttle 

                                - Upload Date
                                - Photo Date
                                - Title

Clear Search13 results found.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 238 (Tuesday, December 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 63705]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30189]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-68-000]


Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

December 6, 1995.
    Take notice that on December 1, 1995, Northern Natural Gas Company 
(Northern), tendered for filing changes in its FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth 
Revised Volume No. 1.
    Northern states that the filing revises the current Stranded 
Account No. 858 and Stranded Account No. 858-Reverse Auction 
surcharges, which are designed to recover costs incurred by Northern 
related to its contracts with third-party pipelines. Therefore, 
Northern has filed 6th Rev Seventeenth Revised Sheet Nos. 50 and 51 and 
Twenty-Fifth Rev Sheet No. 53 to revise these surcharges effective 
January 1, 1996.
    Northern states that copies of this filing were served upon the 
Company's customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. Pursuant to Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations, all such motions or protests must be filed not later than 
12 days after the date of the filing noted above. All protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken in this proceeding, but will not serve to make protestant a 
party to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-30189 Filed 12-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### CLARENCE McHORNEY, Admr., v. LULA M. WOOTEN, Admx., et al.

(Filed 19 September, 1951.)

Death § 5b—

Where death is the result of the sum total of the torts, neglects and defaults of several parties, all may be joined in the action for wrongful death. G.S. 28-173.

This opinion was written in accordance with the Court’s decision and filed by order of the Court after *Chief Justice Stacy’s*death.

Valentine, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Appeal by defendants from *Morris, J.,*January Term, 1951, Pasquo-tank — from Camden.

Civil action to recover damages for the wrongful death of plaintiff’s intestate, alleged to have been caused by the successive, joint and concurrent neglect or default of the defendants.

The facts alleged in the instant complaint in respect of the acts of negligence of the defendants are identical with those set out in the companion case of *Barber v. Wooten, Admx.,*concurrently being decided, except here the plaintiff’s intestate was the driver of the McHorney car and ■only two parties defendant have been sued.

Separate demurrers were interposed by the defendants for misjoinder •of parties and causes. Demurrers overruled; exceptions.

The defendants appeal, assigning errors.

*111
      *McMullan & Aydlett for plaintiff, appellee.*

*Frank B. Aycock, Jr., for defendant Wooten, appellant.*

*J. Henry LeRoy for defendant Lay den, appellant.*

Stacy, C. J.

The judgment overruling tlie demurrers will be upheld on authority of what is said in the companion case of *Barber v. Wooten, Admx., ante,*107.

This case affords perhaps a clearer, if not a more pronounced, distinction from the *Atkins case,*208 N.C. 245, 179 S.E. 889, than does the *Barber case.*Here, the action is for the wrongful death of plaintiff’s intestate — -the'result of the sum total of all the torts, neglects or defaults of the defendants which culminated in the right given by the “Lord Campbell Act.” G.S. 28-173.

The demurrers were properly overruled.

Affirmed.

Note: This opinion was written in accordance with the Court’s decision and filed by order of the Court after *Chief Justice Stacy's*death.

YaleNtihe, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
STYLE:

v.

RE: Case No. 15-0189 DATE

COA #: 12-14-00299-CV TC#: 3-41298

MICHAEL KENNEDY

THE TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS, A

TEXAS, ET AL.

Today the Supreme Court of Texas denied 

petition for review in the above-referenced 

MS. CATHY S. LUSK

CLERK, TWELFTH COURT OF 

1517 WEST FRONT, SUITE

TYLER, TX 75702
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5349 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5349

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish a deadline for 
     the certification of certain forms by regional offices of the 
                    Department of Veterans Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 31, 2014

 Mr. Latta (for himself, Ms. Fudge, Mr. Joyce, Mr. Chabot, Mr. Ryan of 
    Ohio, and Mr. Stivers) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish a deadline for 
     the certification of certain forms by regional offices of the 
                    Department of Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``VA Appeals Backlog Relief Act''.

SEC. 2. DEADLINE FOR CERTIFICATION OF APPEALS FORMS BY REGIONAL OFFICES 
              OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall take such steps as may be 
necessary to ensure that when a regional office of the Department of 
Veterans Affairs receives a form known as ``VA Form 9, Appeal to Board 
of Veterans' Appeals'', or any successor form, submitted by a veteran 
to appeal a decision relating to a claim, the regional office certifies 
such form by not later than one year after the date of the receipt of 
the form.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Raven Moon Entertainment,
Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Joey DiFrancesco, President, Chief Executive Officer and principal
financial officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.


Dated: August 19, 2004


                                            /s/  Joseph DiFrancesco
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Joseph DiFrancesco, President,
                                                 Chief Executive Officer and
                                                 principal financial officer
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members         
    -  AEE Multimedia 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# PHOTOS ANDVIDEOS

Search

Search

                                - All Images 
                                - Other 
                                - Space Shuttle 

                                - Upload Date
                                - Photo Date
                                - Title

----

Download Image: Full Size (1.62 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
#### STATE v. FRANK BALLARD.

(Filed 22 March, 1944.)

Appeal by defendant from *Williams, J.,*at November Term, 1943, of HAENETT.

Criminal prosecution tried upon indictment charging the defendant of assault with intent to commit rape.

Verdict: Guilty. Judgment: Imprisonment in the State’s Prison for a term of not less than ten or more than fifteen years.

Defendant appeals, assigning error.

*Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorneys-General Patton and Rhodes for the State.*

*Neill McK. Salmon for defendant.*

Pee Cueiam.

After a careful consideration of defendant’s exceptive assignments of error, we are of opinion they are without sufficient merit to disturb the verdict below.

In the trial below, we find

No error.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4932 Filed: 12/02/19 Entered: 12/02/19 13:11:55 Page 1 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4932 Filed: 12/02/19 Entered: 12/02/19 13:11:55 Page 2 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4932 Filed: 12/02/19 Entered: 12/02/19 13:11:55 Page 3 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4932 Filed: 12/02/19 Entered: 12/02/19 13:11:55 Page 4 of

4
#### John V. Le Moyne v. George F. Harding.

*Tax Titles—Validity of—Freeholds—Jurisdiction.*

This court has no jurisdiction of a case involving a freehold estate.

[Opinion filed April 3, 1889.]

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Lorin C. Collins, Judge, presiding.

Messrs. Wilson & Moore, for appellant.

Mr. William J. Ammen, for appellee.

Gary, J.

The question upon this record is, whether a tax title, purporting to be a fee simple of the premises in con*625trov.ersy, should be held valid, redeemed from on the relation of the parties as tenants in common, or set aside unconditionally.

The Circuit Court adopted the latter course in the decree appealed from. Whether that decree is-right or not. is a question that involves a freehold, and this court has no jurisdiction to decide it. Pratt v. Kendig, last term.

*Appeal dismissed.*