alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 21 (Tuesday, February 2, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 5436]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-01795]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP16-299-000]


Tuscarora Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Initiation of 
Section 5 Proceeding

    On January 21, 2016, the Commission issued an order in Docket No. 
RP16-299-000, pursuant to section 5 of the Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S.C. 
717d (2012), instituting an investigation into the justness and 
reasonableness of Tuscarora Gas Transmission Company (Tuscarora) 
currently effective tariff rates. The Commission's order directs 
Tuscarora to file a full cost and revenue study within 75 days of the 
issuance of the order. Tuscarora Gas Transmission Company, 154 FERC 
]61,030 (2016).

    Dated: January 21, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-01795 Filed 2-1-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 237 (Monday, December 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63529-63530]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30142]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Summit Bancorp, Inc.; Acquisition of Company Engaged in 
Permissible Nonbanking Activities

    The organization listed in this notice has given notice under Sec.  
225.23(a)(2) or (e) of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.23(a)(2) or 
(e)) for the Board's approval under section 4(c)(8) of the Bank Holding 
Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843(c)(8)) and Sec.  225.21(a) of Regulation Y 
(12 CFR 225.21(a)) to acquire or control voting securities or assets of 
a company engaged in a nonbanking activity that is listed in Sec.  
225.25 of Regulation Y as closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, such activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    The notice is available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. Once the notice has been accepted for 
processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices of 
the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in 
writing on the question whether consummation of the proposal can 
``reasonably be expected to produce benefits to the public, such as 
greater convenience, increased competition, or gains in efficiency, 
that outweigh possible adverse effects, such as undue concentration of 
resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interests, or 
unsound banking practices.'' Any request for a hearing on this question 
must be accompanied by a statement of the reasons a written 
presentation would not suffice in lieu of a hearing, identifying 
specifically any questions of fact that are in dispute, 

[[Page 63530]]
summarizing the evidence that would be presented at a hearing, and 
indicating how the party commenting would be aggrieved by approval of 
the proposal.
    Comments regarding this application must be received not later than 
December 28, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (Michael E. Collins, Senior 
Vice President) 100 North 6th Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19105:
    1. Summit Bancorp, Inc., Johnstown, Pennsylvania; to acquire 
Cambria Thrift Consumer Discount Company, Ebensburg, Pennsylvania, and 
thereby engage in making and servicing loans as a consumer finance 
company, pursuant to Sec.  225.25(b)(1)(i) of the Board's Regulation Y. 
These activities will be conducted throughout Cambria County, 
Pennsylvania.
    In connection with this acquisition, Notificant also has applied to 
establish a new subsidiary, Value Finance Company, Johnstown, 
Pennsylvania, which will also make and service loans through Cambria 
Thrift Consumer Discount Company.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 6, 
1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-30142 Filed 12-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 5176    Filed: 12/19/19    Entered: 12/19/19 17:17:40    Page 1 of1
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7591]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3088]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50-361 and 50-362]


Southern California Edison Co.; San Diego Gas and Electric Co.; 
the City of Riverside, California; the City of Anaheim, California; and 
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units Nos. 2 and 3

    Notice is hereby given that the United States Nuclear Regulatory 
Commission (the Commission) is considering approval under 10 CFR 50.80 
of the proposed corporate restructuring of San Diego Gas & Electric 
Company (SDG&E), one of the co-owners of San Onofre Nuclear Generating 
Station, Units 2 and 3. By letter dated November 11, 1994, Richard A. 
Meserve of Covington & Burling, Counsel for SDG&E, informed the 
Commission that a corporate restructuring of SDG&E has been proposed 
that will result in the creation of a holding company under the 
temporary name SDO Parent Co., Inc. (``Parent Company'') of which SDG&E 
would become a subsidiary. Under the restructuring, the holders of 
SDG&E common stock will become the holders of common stock of the 
Parent Company on a share-by-share basis. After the restructuring, 
SDG&E will continue to be a public utility providing the same utility 
services as it did immediately prior to the reorganization. SDG&E will 
continue to be a licensee of the San Onofre units, and no transfer of 
the operating licenses or interests in the units will result from the 
restructuring. Control of the operating licenses for the San Onofre 
units, now held by SDG&E and its co-owners, will remain with SDG&E and 
the same owners and will not be affected by the restructuring.
    Pursuant to 10 CFR part 80, the Commission may approve the transfer 
of control of a license, after notice to interested persons. Such 
action is contingent upon the Commission's determination that the 
holder of the license and the transfer of such control is otherwise 
consistent with applicable provisions of law, regulations, and orders 
of the Commission.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 31st day of January 1995.
Mel B. Fields,
Project Manager, Project Directorate IV-2, Division of Reactor Projects 
III/IV, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 95-3088 Filed 2-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Washington Banking Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard A. Shields, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)
     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report. This certification is being furnished solely to comply with the requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any of the Companys filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise be deemed to be filed as part of the Report or under such Acts. /s/ Richard A. ShieldsRichard A. ShieldsChief Financial Officer November 9, 2010


---
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5748 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5748

To extend the requirement that drug manufacturers that increase prices 
   faster than inflation pay an additional rebate to State Medicaid 
          programs to include manufacturers of generic drugs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 20, 2014

 Mr. Cummings introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the requirement that drug manufacturers that increase prices 
   faster than inflation pay an additional rebate to State Medicaid 
          programs to include manufacturers of generic drugs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``The Medicaid Generic Drug Price 
Fairness Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. APPLYING THE MEDICAID ADDITIONAL REBATE REQUIREMENT TO 
              MANUFACTURERS OF GENERIC DRUGS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1927(c)(3)(A) of the Social Security Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1396r-8(c)(3)(A)) is amended--
            (1) in clause (ii), by striking the period and inserting 
        ``,''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following flush text: ``and 
        shall be increased by an amount determined in the same manner 
        as the increase in the amount of a rebate for a single source 
        drug or an innovator multiple source drug is determined under 
        paragraph (2).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to rebate periods beginning on or after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members         
    -  AEE Multimedia         
    -  AEE Research Library 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# PHOTOS ANDVIDEOS

Search

Search

                                - All Images 
                                - Other 
                                - Space Shuttle 

                                - Upload Date
                                - Photo Date
                                - Title

----

Download Image: Full Size (1.83 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 5, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00718

- CV

VR PARTNERS I, L.P.,

Appellant

v.

MIDTEX OIL, L.P . and Juniper Vent ures of Texas, LLC,

Appellee s

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 19

- 0448

- CV

- C

Honorable William Old, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s Unopposed Motion to Review Further Order is GRANTED.

_________________________________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 5th day of November, 2019

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 573 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 16, 2013 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To amend Public Law 93–435 with respect to the Northern 

Mariana Islands, providing parity with Guam, the Virgin 

Islands, and American Samoa. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 573 RFS

1 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The first section and section 2 of 

3 Public Law 93–435 (48 U.S.C. 1705, 1706) are amended 

4 by inserting ‘‘the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana 

5 Islands,’’ after ‘‘Guam,’’ each place it appears. 

6 (b) REFERENCES TO DATE OF ENACTMENT.—For 

7 the purposes of the amendment made by subsection (a), 

8 each reference in Public Law 93–435 to the ‘‘date of en9 actment’’ shall be considered to be a reference to the date 

10 of the enactment of this section. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 15, 2013. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 238 (Tuesday, December 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63701-63702]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30203]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-56-000]


El Paso Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

December 6, 1995.
    Take notice that on November 30, 1995, El Paso Natural Gas Company 
(El Paso), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Volume 
No. 1-A, the 

[[Page 63702]]
following tariff sheets, to become effective January 1, 1996:

4th Revised Fourth Revised Sheet No. 23
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 24
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 26
3rd Revised Third Revised Sheet No. 27
3rd Revised Third Revised Sheet No. 28
First Revised Sheet Nos. 30-32

    El Paso states that Section 31.4(b) of its tariff provides the 
mechanism by which El Paso adjusts the interest calculated on the 
unrecovered balance of its stranded investment cost in Washington Ranch 
Storage Facility and then adjusts the Monthly Amortized Amount 
allocated to each Shipper. El Paso states that the Tariff further 
provides that El Paso will adjust its rates for any differences 
resulting from the use of the estimated interest versus the actual 
interest and such difference shall be added to or deducted from the 
estimated interest for the upcoming six month period.
    El Paso states that the Monthly Amortized Amount has been adjusted 
to reflect the projected interest and the difference in the previously 
estimated interest and actual interest utilizing the appropriate 
interest rate calculated pursuant to Sec. 154.501(d)(1) of the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act. 
El Paso states that the projected interest was calculated on the 
remaining unrecovered balance of the stranded investment costs. El Paso 
states that the revised Washington Ranch Reservation Surcharges and 
resulting Monthly Billed Amounts are shown on the tendered tariff 
sheets.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest any of these filings 
should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C., 20426, 
in accordance with Secs. 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. Pursuant to Sec. 154.210 of the Commission's 
regulations, all such motions or protests must be filed not later than 
12 days after the date of the filings noted above. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of the filings are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-30203 Filed 12-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-59,939-03

EX PARTE TRACY LANE BEATTY, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR POST-CONVICTION WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IN

CAUSE NO. 241-0978-04 IN THE 241 JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

ST

SMITH COUNTY

Per curiam. ALCALA, J., filed a concurring statement. KEASLER, J., not

participating.

O R D E R

This is a subsequent application for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to the

provisions of Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 11.071 § 5.

1

In August 2004, a jury found applicant guilty of the offense of capital murder. The

jury answered the special issues submitted pursuant to Article 37.071, and the trial court,

accordingly, set applicant’s punishment at death.

Unless otherwise indicated all references to Articles refer to the Code of

1

Criminal Procedure.
Beatty - 2

This Court affirmed applicant’s conviction and sentence on direct appeal. Beatty

v. State, No. AP-75,010 (Tex. Crim. App. Mar. 11, 2009)(not designated for publication).

This Court denied relief on applicant’s initial post-conviction application for a writ of

habeas corpus. Ex parte Beatty, No. WR-59,939-02 (Tex. Crim. App. May 6, 2009)(not

designated for publication).

2

On August 5, 2015, applicant filed in the trial court a subsequent application for a

writ of habeas corpus. In the subsequent application, applicant asserts that he was denied

the effective assistance of both trial and appellate counsel and that the State violated his

due process rights “when it gave the jury a false impression that [the victim] withdrew her

consent for [him] to enter their home.” On August 11, 2015, this Court stayed applicant’s

execution.

After reviewing applicant’s subsequent application, we find that he has failed to

satisfy the requirements of Article 11.071 § 5. Accordingly, the application is dismissed

as an abuse of the writ without reviewing the merits of the claims, and the stay of

execution is lifted. Art. 11.071 § 5(c).

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 14 DAY OF OCTOBER, 2015.

th

Do Not Publish

On August 6, 2004, applicant filed with this Court an application for an original

2

writ of habeas corpus challenging two contempt orders. The Court denied him leave to

file that application on October 27, 2004. See Ex parte Beatty, No. WR-59,939-01 (no

written order issued).
Opinion issued October 4, 2012

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-11-00394-CV

BERNARD OSTROFF, KATHLEEN OSTROFF, CHAD M. OSTROFF, 

TYLER A. OSTROFF AND COLLIN SOMERVILLE-OSTROFF, 

Appellants

V.

ANTHONY J. MUFFOLETTO, M.D., INDIVIDUALLY, METHODIST 

ORTHOPEDIC SPECIALISTS OF TEXAS, RANDALL ALAN NEMITZ, 

M.D., INDIVIDUALLY, GREATER HOUSTON ANESTHESIOLOGY, 

MEMORIAL HERMANN HOSPITAL SYSTEM, MEMORIAL HERMANN 

HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, MEMORIAL HERMANN SOUTHWEST

HOSPITAL, Appellees

On Appeal from the 164th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1046882

MEMORANDUM OPINION
2

Appellants, Bernard Ostroff, Kathleen Ostroff, Chad M. Ostroff, Tyler A. 

Ostroff and Collin Somerville-Ostroff, have neither paid the required fees nor 

established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (“A 

party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying costs must pay—at 

the time an item is presented for filing—whatever fees are required by statute or 

Supreme Court order.”), 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see 

also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 51.207 (Vernon Supp. 2011), § 51.941(a) (Vernon 

2005), § 101.041 (Vernon Supp. 2011) (requiring payment of fees in court of 

appeals), Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and 

the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 

Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. 

A § B(1) (listing required fees in court of appeals). 

On July 16, 2012, the Court notified appellants that the appeal was subject to 

dismissal for failure to pay the required fees. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (authorizing 

enforcement of rule), 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal of appeal for want of 

prosecution). On August 9, 2012, appellees moved for dismissal for want of 

prosecution because appellants had not paid the required fees. Appellants did not 

respond to the Court’s notice or to appellees’ motion to dismiss.
3

We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We 

dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Sharp.
EXHIBIT A-27 

Exhibit A-27 Page 719

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-28 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page 1

of 22
Exhibit A-27 Page 720

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-28 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page 2

of 22
Exhibit A-27 Page 721

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-28 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page 3

of 22
Exhibit A-27 Page 722

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-28 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page 4

of 22
Exhibit A-27 Page 723

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-28 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page 5

of 22
Exhibit A-27 Page 724

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-28 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page 6

of 22
Exhibit A-27 Page 725

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-28 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page 7

of 22
Exhibit A-27 Page 726

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-28 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page 8

of 22
Exhibit A-27 Page 727

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-28 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page 9

of 22
Exhibit A-27 Page 728

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-28 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

10 of 22
Exhibit A-27 Page 729

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-28 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

11 of 22
Exhibit A-27 Page 730

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-28 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

12 of 22
Exhibit A-27 Page 731

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-28 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

13 of 22
Exhibit A-27 Page 732

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-28 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

14 of 22
Exhibit A-27 Page 733

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-28 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

15 of 22
Exhibit A-27 Page 734

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-28 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

16 of 22
Exhibit A-27 Page 735

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-28 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

17 of 22
Exhibit A-27 Page 736

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-28 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

18 of 22
Exhibit A-27 Page 737

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-28 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

19 of 22
Exhibit A-27 Page 738

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-28 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

20 of 22
Exhibit A-27 Page 739

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-28 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

21 of 22
Exhibit A-27 Page 740

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-28 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

22 of 22