alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 2, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00069

- CR

Delmis Edmond SHIELDS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 5475

Honorable N. Keith Will iams, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The appellant’s second motion for extension of time to file their brief is granted. The

appellant’s brief is due on July 1, 2016. No further extensions of time will be granted absent

extraordinary circumstances.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 2nd day of June, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Motion Granted; Vacated and R emanded and Memorandum Opinion filed June 11 , 2015

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 15

- 00150

- CV

THE HARRIS COUNTY AP PRAISAL DISTRICT , Appellant

V.

CLEAR LAKE OFFICE PA RTNERS, LLC AND METR O CLEAR LAKE OFFICE PARTNERS, LLC , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 127th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2013

- 53295

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment signed January 22 , 201 5

. On May 21 , 20 15 , the parties filed a n agreed motion to reinstate the appeal and remand this case to the trial court for entry of an agreed final judgment. See Tex. R. App. P.
42.1 (a)(2)(B) . The motion is granted.2 Accordingly, we order the trial court’s judgment vacated and set aside
without regard to the merits and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties ’ agreement.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jamison and Busby.
Skip to main content

# Social Security

Search
Menu
Español
Sign in

## Time Series for Selected Financial Items

Office of the Chief Actuary 

Financial operations for selected time period

Graphs showing trust fund asset reserves, income, & cost.

Trust fund data

Trust fund FAQs

Financial data are available for the       Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) and       Disability Insurance (DI) Trust Funds by using       the form below. Data for a selected trust fund will be provided for income,      cost, or asset reserves. Data are available for years after 1986.
|     Trust fundOASI           DI           Both funds combined     Financial itemsIncome, cost, and asset reserves         Income components         Cost components           Reporting frequencyMonth         Quarter         Calendar year         Fiscal yearNote: the Federal Government's fiscal year is        the 12-month period ending September 30.    Number of yearsLast 2 years          Last 5 years           Last 10 years                 All years    Display unitsNone          Thousands           Millions                 Billions                           Footer menu |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00445

- CR

Michael Raynard Speace Jr.

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From Criminal District Court No. 2

o f Tarrant County (1368270D )

July 23, 2015

Opinion by Justice Gardner

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affi rmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Anne Gardner

_________________ Justice Anne Gardner
#### STATE v. ALVIN C. CORNWELL.

(Filed 14 January, 1959.)

Appeal by defendant from *Pless, J.}*at July 1958 Regular Criminal Term, of GastoN.

Criminal prosecution (as shown by the record and by certificate of Clerk of Superior Court of Gaston County in response to order upon suggestion of diminution of record) upon three bills of indictment, originating in warrants issued out of court of justice of the peace, hearing waived and defendant bound over to Superior Court, and there cases consolidated for trial, charging defendant with several offenses as follows:

I. Number 1187 on two counits of operating a motor vehicle upon a public road, street or highway of Gaston County (1) while under the influence of intoxicating liquors; and (2) while under the influence of bitters, morphine or narcotic drugs. Tried only on first count.

II. Number 1188 for assault upon one R. E. Shaney with a deadly weapon, to wit a certain knife; and

III. Number 1189 for resisting arrest.

Defendant pleaded to each charge: Not guilty.

Verdict: In #1187— “Guilty of operating an automobile under the influence.”

In #1188— Not guilty — and

In #1189— Guilty.

Judgment: In #1187 — • Confinement in common jail of Gaston County for a term of not less than eighteen months nor more than twenty-four months, assigned to work under the supervision of the State Prison Department. Defendant excepts.

In #1189— Confinement in common jail of Gaston County “for a term of two years, to be assigned to work under the supervision o-f the State Prison Department. Service of this sentence to begin at expiration of the prison sentence imposed in case #1187, and is to be served separately therefrom and in addition thereto. This prison sentence is suspended with consent of defendant for a period of five years upon the following conditions: (1) That the defendant be of good behavior and not in any wise violate the law, and (2) That he not operate a motor vehicle upon the public highways for a period of five years, and not then unless and until he shall have obtained a valid driver’s license. Otherwise, capias to issue to put the prison sentence into effect at any subsequent term of the court.”

Defendant appeals to Supreme Court and assigns error.

*423
      *Attorney General Seawell, Assistant Attorney General Harry W. McGalliard, for the State.*

*Mullen, Holland & Cooke for defendant, appellant.*

PeR Cueiam.

Careful consideration of all exceptions presented on this appeal fails to disclose error of such prejudicial nature as to require a new trial. The matters to which defendant excepts are in substantial accord with decisions of this Court.

Hence in the trial below the Court holds there is

No Error.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5766 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to modify the criteria for selecting 

communities to participate in the Small Community Air Service Development Program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 20, 2014 

Mr. O’ROURKE (for himself and Mr. LAMBORN) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to modify the criteria 

for selecting communities to participate in the Small 

Community Air Service Development Program, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘21st Century SCASDP 

5 Act’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5766 IH

1 SEC. 2. SMALL COMMUNITY AIR SERVICE DEVELOPMENT 

2 PROGRAM. 

3 Section 41743(c)(1) of title 49, United States Code, 

4 is amended to read as follows: 

5 ‘‘(1) SIZE.—On the date of submission of an 

6 application by a community or consortium under 

7 subsection (b), the airport serving the community or 

8 consortium— 

9 ‘‘(A) is not larger than a small hub air10 port, as determined using the Department of 

11 Transportation’s most recent published classi12 fication; and 

13 ‘‘(B)(i) has insufficient air carrier service; 

14 or 

15 ‘‘(ii) has unreasonably high air fares.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5672 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5672

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow rollovers from 
        other retirement plans into simple retirement accounts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 19, 2014

   Ms. Foxx (for herself and Mr. Bishop of New York) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow rollovers from 
        other retirement plans into simple retirement accounts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ROLLOVERS PERMITTED FROM OTHER RETIREMENT PLANS INTO SIMPLE 
              RETIREMENT ACCOUNTS.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (B) of section 408(p)(1) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting ``except in the 
case of a rollover contribution described in subsection (d)(3)(G) or a 
rollover contribution otherwise described in subsection (d)(3) or in 
section 402(c), 403(a)(4), 403(b)(8), or 457(e)(16) which is made after 
the 2-year period described in section 72(t)(6),'' before ``with 
respect to which the only contributions allowed''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to contributions made after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5445 

To impose a temporary moratorium on the closure or consolidation of any 

mail processing facility, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 10, 2014 

Mr. RICHMOND (for himself, Mr. BLUMENAUER, and Ms. KAPTUR) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 

Government Reform 

A BILL 

To impose a temporary moratorium on the closure or consolidation of any mail processing facility, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Postal Jobs Protection 

5 Act of 2014’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5445 IH

1 SEC. 2. MORATORIUM ON CLOSURE OR CONSOLIDATION OF 

2 MAIL PROCESSING FACILITIES. 

3 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no mail 

4 processing facility operating as of September 1, 2014, may 

5 be closed or consolidated prior to December 31, 2015. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Charles W. Newman, Respondent, v. Charles H. Van Buren, Appellant.

— Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 18, 2020

No. 04-19-00844-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF C.C.,

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Duval County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC-18-53

The Honorable Selina Nava Mireles, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant appeals the trial court’s termination of his parental rights. Appellant’s courtappointed attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in 

which he asserts there are no meritorious issues to raise on appeal. We have held that in parentaltermination appeals, a procedure akin to Anders is necessary to best protect the statutory right to 

counsel on appeal, to provide a procedural mechanism for counsel to fulfill his ethical 

obligations, to assist the court in deciding appeals, and to provide consistent procedures for all 

indigent litigants. In re R.R., No. 04-03-00096-CV, 2003 WL 21157944, at *4 (Tex. App.—San 

Antonio 2003, no pet.); see In re P.M., 520 S.W.3d 24, 27 n.10 (Tex. 2016) (per curiam) 

(applying Anders procedures in appeal from order terminating parental rights). In compliance 

with the procedure set out in Anders, appellant’s attorney has shown that he sent a letter to 

appellant, which explained his right to review the record and file a pro se brief. See Kelly v. 

State, 436 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); In re A.L.H., No. 04-18-00153-CV, 2018 WL 

3861695, at *2 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Aug. 15, 2018, no pet.); In re R.R., 2003 WL 

21157944, at *4. In the letter to appellant, counsel stated that he had enclosed copies of the brief. 

See Kelly, 436 S.W.3d at 313; In re A.L.H., 2018 WL 3861695, at *2; In re R.R., 2003 WL 

21157944, at *4. 

Counsel has also advised appellant that if he wished to review the appellate record, he

must file a motion in this court. Counsel also enclosed a form motion for this purpose. See Kelly, 

436 S.W.3d at 313; In re A.L.H., 2018 WL 3861695, at *2; In re R.R., 2003 WL 21157944, at 

*4. If appellant wishes to review the appellate record, he must file a motion in this court within 

ten days of the date of this order. 

Counsel has also filed a motion for extension of time on behalf of appellant. The motion 

is GRANTED. If appellant desires to file a pro se brief, we ORDER that he do so on or before 

April 7, 2020. If appellant files a pro se brief, appellee may file a responsive brief no later than 

twenty days after the date appellant’s pro se brief is filed in this court. 
_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 18th day of March, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
Skip to main content

# Social Security

Search
Menu
Español
Sign in

## The 2014 OASDI Trustees Report

Office of the Chief Actuary

Reading the Report

Table of ContentsList of TablesList of FiguresIndex

The 2014 OASDI Trustees Report, officially called       "*The 2014 Annual Report of the Board of Trustees of the Federal      Old-Age and Survivors Insurance and Federal Disability Insurance Trust Funds*,"      presents the current and projected financial status of the trust funds.      The report is available in PDF, a       printer-friendly format.

Requests for a printed copy of the 2014 Trustees Report may be submitted       by filling out our request form.

####     Related information 

Supplemental Single-Year Tables

**Documentation of Key Assumptions**
          -  	 Demographic assumptions  used in the projections that determine the actuarial status of the trust funds 	 
          -        Ultimate economic assumptions  used in the projections that determine the actuarial status of the trust funds	     

 See model documentation for a description of all assumptions and methods used in the projections. 

**Model Documentation**-       Description of the methods used in the  long      range projections  that determine the actuarial status of the trust funds
Description of the methods used in the       
short range projections
 of      trust fund operations

**Related reports**- Summary of the latest report       for the Social Security and Medicare programs (also available in       printer-friendly  PDF )
Trustees Report on the       
financial      status of the Medicare program

**Special reports on OASI or DI Trust Fund assets dropping below 20 percent of annual cost within 10 years:**- Letter to the President of the Senate
- Letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives

Footer menu
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7531]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3063]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Project Nos. 2572 and 2458]


Great Northern Paper, Inc.; Notice Extending the Time To Comment 
on Draft EIS

February 2, 1995.
    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) issued a 
Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for 2 projects on the 
Penobscot River Basin, Maine. The Notice of Availability of the DEIS 
appeared in the Federal Register on December 9, 1994, 59 FR 63791.
    In response to letters filed by the Penobscot Indian Nation on 
January 18, 1995, and by Great Northern Paper, Inc., on January 30, 
1995, the Commission is extending the comment period on the DEIS from 
February 8, 1995, until February 22, 1995.
    Anyone wishing to comment in writing on the DEIS must do so no 
later than February 22, 1995. Comments should be addressed to: Lois D. 
Cashell, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North 
Capitol Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    Written correspondence should clearly show the following caption on 
the first page: Penobscot River Basin Docket Nos. 2572 and 2458.
    For further information, please contact Edward R. Meyer at (202) 
208-7998.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-3063 Filed 2-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-22-00706-CV

H. B., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. D-1-FM-21-006937, THE HONORABLE MAYA GUERRA GAMBLE, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant H.B. filed her notice of appeal on November 2, 2022. The appellate 

record was complete on November 21, 2022, making appellant’s brief due by December 12, 2022. 

On December 1, 2022, counsel for appellant filed a motion for a twenty-day extension of time to 

file appellant’s brief.

The rules of judicial administration accelerate the final disposition of appeals 

from suits for termination of parental rights. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) (providing 180 days 

for court’s final disposition). The accelerated schedule constrains this Court’s leeway in granting 

extensions. In this instance, we will grant the motion and order Gregory Sherwood to file 

appellant’s brief no later than January 2, 2023. If the brief is not filed by that date, counsel may 

be required to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of court.
2

It is ordered on December 7, 2022.

Before Chief Justice Byrne and Justices Triana and Smith
#### STATE v. WILLIAM HORTON and OSCAR HORTON.

(Filed 16 September, 1925.)

Appeal by defendants from *Cranmer, J.,*at March Term, 1925, of Gates.

Criminal prosecution, tried upon an indictment, charging tbe defendants witb violations of tbe prohibition law.

From an adverse verdict and judgment pronounced thereon, tbe defendants appeal, assigning errors.

*Attorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.*

*Bridger & Bley for defendants.*

Per Curiam.

Tbe evidence is plenary and conflicting on the issues of defendants’ guilt; it is purely a question of fact; tbe jury has resolved tbe matter against tbe defendants; there is no reversible error appearing on tbe record; tbe verdict and judgments will be upheld.

No error.
#### Thomas Lacy, Respondent, v. Sophronia A. Getman, Appellant.

Judgment and order reversed, ana a new trial granted, with costs to abide event. Opinion by

Boardman, J.
#### Matter of Application to acquire lands by Staten Island Railroad Company, of Greene.

Appeal withdrawn,
#### L. B. SMITH, Administrator of PAUL SMITH, v. O. P. MATTHEWS.

(Filed 21 September, 1932.)

Appeal and Error A d — Appeal from order setting aside the verdict in the court’s discretion will be dismissed as premature.

An appeal before final judgment which an appeal from the final judgment would include and protect is premature and will be dismissed.

Appeal by defendant from. *Harris, J.,*at June Term, 1932, of Wayne.

Appeal dismissed.

*Charles P. Qaylor and J ames J. Hatch for appellant.*

*Dickinson & Freeman for appellee.*

Per Curiam.

This is an action to recover damages for wrongful death caused by alleged negligence of the defendant. The issues of negligence, contributory negligence, and damages were answered in favor of the plaintiff. The court as a matter of discretion set aside the verdict as to damages. The defendant appealed.

“A premature appeal is one which is taken before final judgment, or upon an order affecting a substantial right which could be protected by an appeal from a final judgment.” McIntosh’s Practice & Procedure, sec. 676(7). The present appeal is premature and will be dismissed. *Chambers v. R. R.,*172 N. C., 555; *Joyner v. Reflector Co.,*176 N. C., 274; *Thomas v. Carteret,*180 N. C., 109.

Appeal dismissed.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members         
    -  AEE Multimedia         
    -  AEE Research Library 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# PHOTOS ANDVIDEOS

Search

Search

                                - All Images 
                                - Other 
                                - Space Shuttle 

                                - Upload Date
                                - Photo Date
                                - Title

----

Download Image: Full Size (5.2 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery