alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-13-00130- CV

Neil G allagher; Ronald R. Colem an; Steve F eeken; G allagher F inan cial Gr oup, I nc.; Michael Eastham ; F ellows hip F inan cial, LLC; Michael Caste llano; Brian R. Cervanka; Global One Direc t, LLC; David A. Shi elds; Marc o Lopez; Salvatore Magarac i; Estate P rote ction P lann ing, Corp.; Reid Thorbu rn; Raym on Chad wi ck, Jr.; WalterC. Young; Cre ative We alth Designs, LL C; M ichael Woods; Secured F inan cial Strate gies, LLC; and Wesley Davidson , Appellan ts
v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 126 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -GV-1 0-0 0045 4, H ONO RAB LE GISELA D. TRI ANA-DO Y AL, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellants Neil Gallagher; Ronald R. Coleman; Steve Fe eken; Gallagher Financ ial Group, Inc.; Michae l Eastham; Fe llowship Financ ial, L L C; Michae l Castellano; Br ian R. Cervanka ; Glo b al One Direc t, L L C; David A. Shields; Marc o L opez; Salvatore Mag ara ci; Estate Protection Planning, Corp.; Reid Thorburn; Ray mon Chadwick, J r.; Walte r C
. Young; Creative Wealth D e s ig n s , LL C; M ic h a e l Wo o d s; Secure d Financ ial Strateg ies, L L C; and Wesley Davids o n ( G a ll a gh e r Appellants) have filed a mot ion for voluntary dismiss al of this appea l pursuant t o settlement with appellee , The State of T exas.

Counsel for the Gallagh er Appellants states that he has confe rre d with counsel for additional appellants, who joined the Gallagher Appellants’ notice of appea l, J ames C ra i g Orr,J err

y Nea l Orr, J ohn Todd Reag an, Fr ederick Wil liam Rust, Alternative Soluti ons Insuranc e Service s, Inc.; Be njamin M i l k s ; Milks & Milks; Bridy S. Ikey ; Catherine Sansing; Clement Ng ; Damien Pechac ek; David Rice; Gre g Chick; J ames P o e; J ames S. Ikey ; Kenne th J
. Fr anco; L ighthouse Capital Preser vation; Mike Ahlers; Mi ke Givil ancz, J r.; PC&S, L L C; Shawn C ornett; Stephen J . Skijus ; T.C. W eston; Mark Smith; Niche Investment Group; Razor Fina ncial Servic es; and S en ior Retirement P lanner s, and these additional appellants joi n in the Gallaghe r Appellants’ motion for dismiss al.

We gr ant the motion and dismiss t he appe al. SeeTex. R. App. P . 42.1(a)

.

__________________________________________ J eff Rose, J ustice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Rose, and Goodwin Dismissed on Appellants’ Motion Filed: September

6, 2013

2
#### Judi Rutigliano, Appellant, v Nicholas Rutigliano, Respondent.

[772 NYS2d 880]

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment entered January 17, 2002, the plaintiff mother appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Marano, J.), dated December 21, 2002, which, inter alia, denied her cross motion for permission to relocate with the parties’ son to Florida.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

When reviewing a custodial parent’s request to relocate, the court’s primary focus must be the best interests of the child *(see Tropea v Tropea,*87 NY2d 727, 739 [1996]; *Kime v Kime,*302 AD2d 564 [2003]; *Miller v Pipia,*297 AD2d 362, 365-366 [2002]). Here, contrary to the plaintiffs contentions, the record provides a sound and substantial basis for the Supreme Court’s determination that she should remain in New York and not relocate to Florida with the parties’ son. Krausman, J.P., Luciano, Townes and Rivera, JJ., concur.
PERSONAL DATA-PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a)

RNLTD: _______________________

PERSONAL DATA-PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a)

AIR FORCE J1 DESK

INDIVIDUAL DUTY ASSIGNMENT (IDA) WORKSHEET

Member Information:

Grade/Name: ______________________ SSAN: ____________________

Duty Title: ______________________________ DOB: _______________

Duty Location: ____________________ Duty Phone: ______________________

AF Position #: _______________ FMTS #: ___________ DAFSC_____________

Sponsor:___________________ SDAP: _____Y ______N

AF Desk Actions: Pre-Arrival Actions

____ Forward RIP to Directorate XO’s ____ Build e-PIF ____Project in FMTS 

_____Update MilPDS Project Pos # _____Update Sponsor _____Add arrival date to calendar

Supervisor Information: 

Name:________________________________ SSAN(AF ONLY):____________________

Branch of Svs: ____________________ Supervision Start Date:_________________________

Is EPR/OPR coming from last base? ____Y _____ N Date of Last Report________________

Other Information: 

Date Depart Last Duty Station (DDLDS): ______________ 

Date Arrive Station(DAS): _____________ # Days TDY Enroute: __________

Leaveweb Setup: Edit Profile: Update email; MAJCOM: AFSPC; BASE: Patrick; 

UNIT: AFELM SOUTHCOM

******************************************************************************

AF Desk Actions: 

MilPDS Updates: 

____Confirm Arrival _____Change Rater 1 day after arrival; Project if report is coming from last base

____Change Duty Title ____ Asgn Avail Code (Enlisted- code 50 ; Officer-46 AFI36-2110 T2.1 rule 42)

Other Actions:

____Add member to distro Lists ____SCEMS ____FTMS ____ Create ROP (officers only)

____AEF ____ Office Symbol
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-13-00160-CR

ARACELI TELLO,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 272nd District Court

Brazos County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12-02891-CRF-272

A B A T E M E N T ORDER

The reporter’s record in the above cause has not been filed. The record has 

apparently not been filed because Appellant’s appointed counsel has failed to request 

that it be prepared. In a letter dated May 29, 2013, the Clerk of the Court notified 

Appellant that if she desired to have the reporter’s record for appeal, then she must 

request that it be prepared and simultaneously notify us of that request within twentyone days after the date of our letter. The Clerk also notified Appellant that if she did 

not desire to have the reporter’s record for this appeal, she must notify the court within 
Tello v. State Page 2

fourteen days of the date of the letter that the reporter’s record would not be requested. 

The Clerk also warned Appellant that if the reporter’s record was not requested within 

twenty-one days, the appeal would nevertheless proceed on the clerk’s record alone. 

We have received neither the reporter’s record nor any response from Appellant.

On further consideration, because Appellant’s counsel is appointed, the Court

abates this cause to the trial court with instructions to hold a hearing to determine: (1)

why Appellant’s attorney has failed to request that the reporter’s record be prepared 

and why he has failed to respond to our letter attempting to resolve the issue; (2) 

whether Appellant’s attorney has abandoned the appeal; (3) whether Appellant still 

desires to proceed with the appeal; (4) whether Appellant is receiving effective 

assistance of counsel; and (5) whether Appellant desires to represent herself or obtain 

new counsel. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(a)(2).

The trial court shall conduct the hearing within twenty-one (21) days after the 

date of this order. The trial court clerk and court reporter shall file supplemental 

records within thirty-five (35) days after the date of this order.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Cause abated

Order issued and filed September 19, 2013

Do not publish
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# 2023 USSPACECOM Magazine

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

## Related Documents

2023 USSPACECOM MAGAZINE.PDF
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18

OF THE UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of World Energy Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Benjamin C. Croxton, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/Benjamin C. Croxton

--------------------------------

BENJAMIN C. CROXTON

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer

World Energy Solutions, Inc.



May 15, 2007
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #12201 and #12202]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Connecticut (FEMA-1904-DR), dated 05/28/2010. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms and Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         03/12/2010 through 05/17/2010. *Effective Date:*
                         05/28/2010. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         07/27/2010. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         02/28/2011.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 05/28/2010, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans):* Fairfield, Middlesex, New Haven, New London, Windham. *Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):* Connecticut: Hartford, Litchfield, Tolland. Massachusetts: Worcester. New York: Dutchess, Putnam, Westchester. Rhode Island: Kent, Providence, Washington. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:**Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere*
5.250*Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere*
2.625*Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere*
6.000*Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere*
4.000*Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere*
3.625*Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere*
3.000*For Economic Injury:**Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere*
4.000*Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere*
3.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 122016 and for economic injury is 122020. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) James E. Rivera, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2010-13749 Filed 6-8-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
EXHIBIT 10.98



 Exhibit 10.98 
 

 
 July     , 2009 
 [Executive Officer] 
 Deltek, Inc. 
 13880 Dulles Corner
Lane 
 Herndon, VA 20171 
 Dear
            : 
 Reference is made to (i) the Shareholders’ Agreement,
dated as of April 22, 2005 (as it has been and may be amended from time to time, the “Shareholders’ Agreement”), by and among Deltek, Inc., a Delaware corporation (formerly Deltek Systems, Inc., a Virginia corporation)
(the “Company”), the shareholders of the Company listed on the signature pages to the Shareholders’ Agreement and, with respect to Sections 3.3 and 3.4 thereof, New Mountain Partners II, L.P., New Mountain Affiliated Investors
II, L.P. and Allegheny New Mountain Partners, L.P. (collectively, the “NMP Entities”) and (ii) the Joinder Agreement (the “Joinder Agreement”), by and among you, the Company and the NMP Entities, pursuant to
which you became a party to the Shareholders’ Agreement. 
 On February 19, 2009, the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors of the Company approved an award to you (the “Award”) of             restricted shares of common stock of the Company (the “Restricted Shares”).
The Award has been separately communicated to you by the Company, and the terms of the Award were set forth in a Restricted Stock Agreement by and between you and the Company (the “Restricted Stock Agreement”). In connection with
the Award and with respect to the Restricted Shares, this letter is to confirm our agreement as follows: 
 1. Each of the Company and the
NMP Entities hereby waives any compliance by you with Section 3.1 of the Shareholders’ Agreement with respect to the Restricted Shares from and after the date all restrictions upon the Restricted Shares shall have lapsed pursuant to the
terms of the Restricted Stock Agreement. 
 2. In all other respects, the Shareholders’ Agreement and the Joinder Agreement shall remain
in full force and effect in accordance with their respective terms with respect to the Restricted Shares. Moreover, the waiver contained in this letter shall apply only to the Restricted Shares and not to any other shares of common stock of the
Company that you may now own or hereafter acquire. 
 If the foregoing corresponds to your understanding of our agreement, please sign this
letter in the space provided and return it to us. 
 [Remainder of page intentionally left blank] 








					
	Very truly yours,
	
	DELTEK, INC.
		
	By:	 	  

	Name:	 	
	Title:	 	
	
	NEW MOUNTAIN PARTNERS II, L.P.
		
	By:	 	New Mountain Investments II, L.L.C., its general partner
			
		 	By:	 	  

		 	Name:	 	Steven B. Klinsky
		 	Title:	 	Managing Member
	
	NEW MOUNTAIN AFFILIATED INVESTORS II, L.P.
		
	By:	 	New Mountain Investments II, L.L.C., its general partner
			
		 	By:	 	  

		 	Name:	 	Steven B. Klinsky
		 	Title:	 	Managing Member
	
	ALLEGHENY NEW MOUNTAIN PARTNERS, L.P.
		
	By:	 	New Mountain Investments II, L.L.C., its general partner
			
		 	By:	 	  

		 	Name:	 	Steven B. Klinsky
		 	Title:	 	Managing Member


  

	
	ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED TO
	AS OF THE DATE FIRST WRITTEN ABOVE
	
	  

	[Executive Officer]
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

January 7, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00900

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF N.M., A CHILD

,

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- PA

- 03030 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In this accelerated appeal, appellant mother appeals an order of termination signed December 5, 2014. Accordingly, the notice of appeal was due December 29, 2014, or a motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal is due in this court no later than January 13, 2015. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.1, 26.3. We have received a copy of the notice of appeal which is file

- stamped January 5, 2015. The notice of appeal contains a certificate of service stating the notice of appeal was served on appellee on January 5, 2015 by electroni c service. The notice of appeal is untimely, but there is still time for appellant mother to file a timely motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal.

Accordingly, we ORDER appellant mother to file a motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal in this court on or before January 13, 2015.

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel, the district clerk, and the court reporter. We remind the court reporter the record was due in this court January 5, 2015,

but has not been filed.

___________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on

this 7th day of January, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 31(ii)
                                 --------------


                                 CERTIFICATIONS
                                 --------------

I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

      1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
            10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
            report on Form 10-K of CHL Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2007-1 (the
            "Exchange Act periodic reports");

      2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
            whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
            omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
            in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
            not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
            information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
            covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
            reports;

      4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
            servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance review(s)
            conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement(s) required
            in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
            disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer(s) have
            fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all
            material respects; and

      5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
            criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
            reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
            asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
            accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
            13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
            except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
            of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
            this report on Form 10-K.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
      information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank
      of New York, as Trustee.

Date: March 25, 2008

       /s/ Steve Bailey
       ---------------------------------
       Steve Bailey
       Senior Managing Director, Chief Executive Officer Loan Administration
       (Senior officer in charge of the servicing function of
       Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP)
#### ELBERT D. O’NEAL v. W. W. JONES, W. M. JONES and G. B. JONES, Trading as JONES BROTHERS.

(Filed 29 October, 1930.)

Master and Servant O c — Evidence of employer’s negligence held properly submitted to the jury in this case.

In an employee’s action to recover damages for an alleged negligent personal injury, evidence that plaintiff was acting under the direction of defendant’s foreman with the latter’s assurance that there was no danger, and was injured by a falling wall contiguous *to*a wall being torn down by them, is sufficient to carry the case to the jury on the issue of defendant’s actionable negligence.

Civil actioN for damages, heard by *Barnhill, J.,*at January Term, 1930, of Carteret.

The plaintiff alleged and offered evidence tending to show that he was employed as an ordinary laborer by the defendant, and was engaged in tearing down or pushing down one of the brick walls of a school building which had been previously burned, and that, while so engaged, another wall fell, knocking him through a hole in the floor and resulting in serious and permanent injuries. There was further evidence that assurances were given by one of the defendants and a foreman that there was no danger in the work.

From judgment for the plaintiff assessing damages of $5,000, the defendant appealed.

*G. B. Wheatly and Julius Duncan for plaintiff.*

*Moore & Dumb for defendant.*

*653Pee CuRiam.

There was no allegation or issue as to assumption of risk. There was evidence of negligence, and the testimony tended to show that the plaintiff was working under the direction and supervision of one of the defendants and a foreman, and. that he was doing the work according to instructions given him by said defendant and the foreman. Furthermore, there was evidence that positive assurance was given that there was no danger in doing the work according to the method adopted by the employer.

Hence the trial judge ruled correctly when he submitted the case to the jury. *Neville v. Bonsal,*166 N. C., 218, 81 S. E., 448; *Fowler v. Conduit Co.,*192 N. C., 14, 133 S. E., 188.

No error.