alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-34.4
(logo) ERNST & YOUNG
Quality In Everything We Do

Ernst & Young LLP
901 E. Cary Street Suite 1000
Richmond, VA 23219

Phone (804) 344-6000
www.ey.com


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


Board of Directors
SunTrust Bank


We have examined management's assertion included in the accompanying report of
Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that
SunTrust Bank (the "Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in
Item 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(4)(i), and 1122(d)(4)(ii) of the Securities and
Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the residential mortgage loan servicing
platform of SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. as of and for the year ended December 31,
2007. Refer to management's assertion for the asset backed transactions
covered by this platform. Management is responsible for the Company's
compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance
with the applicable servicing criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as
adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination
included testing of less than all of the individual asset backed transactions
and securities that comprise the platform, testing of less than all of the
servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the
Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected
activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our
procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities
performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our
procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred
either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances
or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by
this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe
that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31,
2007 for the residential mortgage loan servicing platform is fairly stated, in
all material respects.


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


March 6, 2008
S. 325 

One Hundred Seventeenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Sunday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty one 

An Act 

To amend the Alyce Spotted Bear and Walter Soboleff Commission on Native 

Children Act to extend the deadline for a report by the Alyce Spotted Bear 

and Walter Soboleff Commission on Native Children, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. ALYCE SPOTTED BEAR AND WALTER SOBOLEFF COMMISSION ON NATIVE CHILDREN REPORT. 

Section 3(f) of the Alyce Spotted Bear and Walter Soboleff 

Commission on Native Children Act (Public Law 114–244; 130 

Stat. 987) is amended, in the matter preceding paragraph (1), 

by striking ‘‘3 years’’ and inserting ‘‘5 years’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3251 

To provide that chapter 1 of title 9 of the United States Code, relating 

to the enforcement of arbitration agreements, shall not apply to enrollment agreements made between students and certain institutions of higher education, and to prohibit limitations on the ability of students to 

pursue claims against certain institutions of higher education. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2021 

Mr. DURBIN (for himself, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Ms. WARREN, Mr. BROWN, Mr. 

BLUMENTHAL, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. MARKEY, and Mr. REED) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To provide that chapter 1 of title 9 of the United States 

Code, relating to the enforcement of arbitration agreements, shall not apply to enrollment agreements made 

between students and certain institutions of higher education, and to prohibit limitations on the ability of students to pursue claims against certain institutions of 

higher education. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3251 IS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Court Legal Access 

3 and Student Support Act of 2021’’ or the ‘‘CLASS Act 

4 of 2021’’. 

5 SEC. 2. INAPPLICABILITY OF CHAPTER 1 OF TITLE 9, 

6 UNITED STATES CODE, TO ENROLLMENT 

7 AGREEMENTS MADE BETWEEN STUDENTS 

8 AND CERTAIN INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER 

9 EDUCATION. 

10 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 1 of title 9 of the United 

11 States Code (relating to the enforcement of arbitration 

12 agreements) shall not apply to an enrollment agreement 

13 made between a student and an institution of higher edu14 cation. 

15 (b) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘institu16 tion of higher education’’ has the meaning given such term 

17 in section 102 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 

18 U.S.C. 1002). 

19 SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON LIMITATIONS ON ABILITY OF STU20 DENTS TO PURSUE CLAIMS AGAINST CER21 TAIN INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION. 

22 Section 487(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

23 (20 U.S.C. 1094(a)) is amended by adding at the end the 

24 following: 

25 ‘‘(30) The institution will not require any stu26 dent to agree to, and will not enforce, any limitation 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3251 IS

1 or restriction (including a limitation or restriction on 

2 any available choice of applicable law, a jury trial, 

3 or venue) on the ability of a student to pursue a 

4 claim, individually or with others, against an institu5 tion in court.’’. 

6 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

7 This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall 

8 take effect 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### RALPH FESPERMAN v. W. O. PRATT.

(Filed 14 May, 1930.)

Master and Servant O b — Where employer furnishes means of descent and employee chooses to use other means, employer is not liable.

Where the plaintiff, employed by the defendant to work on a building under construction, is injured by falling therefrom while using a rope to descend from the roof, when the employer had provided a step-ladder for the purpose of ascent and descent, and the rope had been provided to draw lumber to the roof: *Held,*the employer is not liable for the injury caused by the failure to use the safe means provided for ascent and descent from the building.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Harwood, Special Judge,*at November Term, 1929, of Cabarrus.

Affirmed.

Action to recover damages for personal injuries caused, as alleged in the complaint, by the negligence of defendant in failing to provide reasonably safe means by which plaintiff could descend from the roof of a building on which he was at work as an employee of defendant.

From judgment dismissing the action as of nonsuit, at the close of the evidence for the plaintiff, plaintiff appealed to the Supreme Court.

*H. S. Williams for plaintiff.*

*Hartsell & Hartsell for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff was at work as an employee of defendant on the roof of a building in the course of construction. Defendant had provided a ladder by means of which plaintiff and other employees of defendant, at work on the roof of the building, could ascend and descend from the place at which they were required to work. Plaintiff instead of using this ladder, undertook to descend from the roof by means of a rope which defendant had provided for drawing lumber and other material from the ground to the roof. This rope was not fastened to the roof, and plaintiff fell to the ground and was injured.

*688Tbe judgment dismissing tbe action upon tbe ground that tbe evidence for tbe plaintiff failed to, show that bis injuries were caused by tbe negligence of defendant, as alleged in tbe complaint, is in accord with tbe decision of tbis Court in *Bennett v. Powers,*192 N. C., 599, 135 S. E., 535. It is said in tbe opinion in that case that “where an employer has by tbe exercise of ordinary care provided reasonably safe means by wbieb bis employee can get to and from tbe place of bis work, and tbe employee knows of such means, having previously used tbe same, but voluntarily chooses another and hazardous way, not provided by tbe employer, tbe employer cannot be held liable for damages resulting from an injury sustained by tbe employee, caused by tbe conditions chosen by him without authority from or notice to tbe employer.”

There is no error in tbe judgment. It is

Affirmed.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# PHOTOS ANDVIDEOS

Search

Search

                                - All Images 
                                - Other 
                                - Space Shuttle 

                                - Upload Date
                                - Photo Date
                                - Title

----

Download Image: Full Size (0.44 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - 14 CFR Part 71
          - [Docket No. FAA-2009-0605; Airspace Docket No. 09-ASO-19]

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

# SUMMARY:

                        This action confirms the effective date of a direct final rule published in the                         **Federal Register**                         September 14, 2009 that establishes Class E Airspace at Heaven's Landing Airport, Clayton, GA.                    

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         0901 UTC, January 27, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Melinda Giddens, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O. Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404) 305-5610.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Confirmation of Effective Date

                    The FAA published this direct final rule with a request for comments in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 14, 2009 (74 FR 46893), Docket No. FAA-2009-0605; Airspace Docket 09-ASO-19. The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would become effective on December 17, 2009. No adverse comments were received, and thus this notice confirms that effective date.                

Issued in College Park, Georgia, on January 14, 2010.

Myron A. Knight,

Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic Organization.

[FR Doc. 2010-1381 Filed 1-26-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350   In connection with the Quarterly Report of World Energy Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Benjamin C. Croxton, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my knowledge that:  (i)  the accompanying Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Act); and  (ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  WORLD ENERGY SOLUTIONS, INC.  /s/ Benjamin C. Croxton BENJAMIN C. CROXTON Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer  January 12, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,651,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               19,539,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 31,163,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            54,531,000
<PP&E>                                     138,840,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             224,329,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       27,111,000
<BONDS>                                    152,300,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               224,329,000
<SALES>                                         55,797
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                           48,522
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,833
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,968
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,556,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (279)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,277,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT B 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4758-2 Filed: 11/15/19 Entered: 11/15/19 10:11:43 Page 1

of 3
Exhibit B 

Budget and Staffing Plan 

Aggregate Budget for Matter Categories for the Period Beginning on June 1, 2019 and 

Ending on September 30, 2019 

Matter 

Number Project Category Description Hours Budgeted 

Total Compensation 

Budgeted1

Applicable to the Debtors 

020 Legislative Issues 500 $431,425.00 

021 

Non-Bankruptcy Litigation / Wildfire 

(Criminal) 30,575 $15,703,375.00 

022 Non-Working Travel 240 $222,225.00 

023 Purchase Power Agreements (including 

Adversary Proceedings) 360 $340,850.00 

025 Regulatory Issues 5,060 $3,682,125.00 

026 Retention / Billing / Fee Applications: MTO 240 $197,550.00

Total 36,975 $20,577,550 

 

1

 Budgeted numbers do not necessarily amount to a 1:1 ratio because they reflect a blended hourly rate and a 

variable allocation of timekeepers and hours, depending on the needs for each matter number. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4758-2 Filed: 11/15/19 Entered: 11/15/19 10:11:43 Page 2

of 3
Aggregate Staffing Plan Across All Matter Categories 

for the Period Beginning on June 1, 2019 and Ending on September 30, 2019 

Category of Timekeeper 

Number of Timekeepers 

Expected to Work on 

the Matter Categories 

During the Budget Period 

Average 

Hourly Rate2

Partner 16 $1,114 

Of Counsel 1 $890 

Associate 6 $710 

Jr. Associate 10 $541 

Staff Attorney 17 $425 

eDiscovery Attorney 1 $575 

Paralegal 9 $358 

ALS 3 $403 

Case Clerks 4 $110 

Litigation Analyst 1 $110 

Total Attorney 51 $624 

Total Non-Attorney 17 $262 

Total 68 $557 

 

2

 The Average Hourly Rate is a weighted average based on the individual hourly rate of, and projected 

number of hours worked by, each timekeeper over the course of the budget period. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4758-2 Filed: 11/15/19 Entered: 11/15/19 10:11:43 Page 3

of 3
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Christopher R. Gardner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation.

|                  |  |     |  |                                                                          
|----------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|December 30, 2008 |  |     |  |                                                                          
|                  |  | By: |  | /s/ CHRISTOPHER R. GARDNER Christopher R. Gardner
Chief Executive Officer

I,
Richard C. Yonker, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation.

|                  |  |     |  |                                                                
|----------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|December 30, 2008 |  |     |  |                                                                
|                  |  | By: |  | /s/ RICHARD C. YONKER Richard C. Yonker
Chief Financial Officer

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation and will be retained by Vitesse Semiconductor
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 243 (Tuesday, December 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65377-65378]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30789]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
[T.D. 95-102]


Customs Commercial Gauger Approval of Inter-Globe Marine 
Consultants

AGENCY: Customs Service, Department of the Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of Approval of Inter-Globe Marine Consultants, as a 
Commercial Gauger.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Inter-Globe Marine Consultants of Houston, Texas has applied 
to U.S. Customs for approval to gauge imported petroleum, petroleum 
products, organic chemicals and vegetable and animal oils under Part 
151.13 of the Customs Regulations (19 CFR 151.13) at their Houston, 
Texas facility. Customs has determined that this facility meets all of 
the requirements for approval as a commercial gauger. Therefore, in 
accordance with Part 151.13(f) of the Customs Regulations, Inter-Globe 
Marine Consultants' Houston, Texas site is approved to gauge the 
products named above in all Customs districts.

LOCATION: Inter-Globe Marine Consultants' approved site is located at: 
12605 East Freeway, Suite 507, Houston, Texas 77015.

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 20, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ira S. Reese, Senior Science Officer, 
Laboratories and Scientific Services, 

[[Page 65378]]
U.S. Customs Service, 1301 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 
20229 at (202) 927-1060.

    Dated: December 12, 1995.
A.W. Tennant,
Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
[FR Doc. 95-30789 Filed 12-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4820-02-P
# II_B

# II_C

# II_D

# III_A

# IV_A

# IV_B

# V_A

# V_B

# V_C

# VI_A

# VI_B

# VI_C

# VI_D

# VI_E

# VI_F

# VI_G1-3

# VI_G4-5

# VI_G6-10

# VI_H