alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Policy Perspectives on Longevity, 

Aging, and Retirement Readiness

Steve Goss, Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

Longevity 15 Conference

Washington, DC

September 12, 2019
2

More of Us Are Living to Higher Ages;

This Will Continue but Likely at a Slower Rate

2
Population Aging in Next 20 Years (Changing Age Distribution)

Will Be Mainly Due to Drop in Birth Rates

3

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

0.40

0.45

0.50

1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090 2100

Aged Dependency Ratio 2019 TR

Population 65+/(20-64) 

Actual and TR Intermediate

TFR remains at 3.0 after 1964

TFR remains at 3.3 after 1964
Retirement Readiness: Will We Have Enough 

Income to Last as Long as We Might Live?

• Social Security—floor of protection 

– Has always paid benefits in full, and will

– But is currently underfinanced by 20% in 2035+

• Due to population aging

• Legislative adjustments to come

– Provides CPI-indexed life annuity

– With remarkable option to start benefits later

• Monthly benefit 77% higher at age 70 than at age 62 start

– How do we better inform on this opportunity?

4
Social Security Benefits: Foundation to Build On 

Source: Annual Recurring Actuarial Note #9 at www.ssa.gov/oact/NOTES/ran9/index.html

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 2040 2060 2080

Scheduled Monthly Benefit Levels as Percent of Career-Average 

Earnings by Year of Retirement at age 65

Low Earner ($24,239 for 2019; 25th percentile)

Medium Earner ($53,864 for 2019; 56th percentile)

High Earner ($86,182 for 2019; 82nd percentile)

Max Earner ($132,900 for 2019; 100th percentile)
Some Future Opportunities for Social 

Security in Retirement Readiness

• Fix the financing gap

• Encourage later benefit start if healthy

• Provide 75% of couple benefit for widow(er)s

• Provide child-care credits toward benefits

– Or even income for “bonding”

– Might encourage more births

• Or opportunity to “purchase” credits

– Possible antiselection issues

• Encourage more personal saving and employer 

pensions to complete retirement income

6
For More Information Go To

http://www.ssa.gov/oact/

• There you will find:

– All OASDI Trustees Reports: 1941-2019

– Detailed single-year tables for recent reports

– Our estimates for comprehensive proposals

– Our estimates for the individual provisions

– Actuarial notes; including replacement rates

– Actuarial studies 

– Extensive databases

– Congressional testimonies

– Presentations by OCACT employees

7
#### John Bowen, Appellant, v. The City of Rome, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with ten dollars costs.

Opinion by

Churchill. J.
No. 697.

*Alexander H. Hadden*for petitioned. *Abraham Freedman*for respondent.

#### Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. *v.*Payne, Administratrix.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

March 24, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135339 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

SHANNON NEAL BRINKLEY,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 135339 

 COA: 269725 

Wayne CC: 98-840467-DM

LENA MARIE BRINKLEY, 

Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

KENNETH BACA and PATRICIA BACA, 

Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 16, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0317 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 24, 2008 

 Clerk
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3302 

To amend the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act to improve 

provisions relating to dyslexia, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 2, 2021 

Mr. CASSIDY (for himself, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina, Mr. 

GRAHAM, and Mr. BRAUN) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and 

Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act 

to improve provisions relating to dyslexia, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘21st Century Dyslexia 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DYSLEXIA. 

7 (a) DEFINITIONS.—Section 602 of the Individuals 

8 with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1401) is 

9 amended— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3302 IS

1 (1) in paragraph (3)(A), by striking ‘‘or specific 

2 learning disabilities’’ and inserting ‘‘dyslexia, or spe3 cific learning disabilities’’; 

4 (2) by inserting after paragraph (3) the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(4) DYSLEXIA.—The term ‘dyslexia’ means an 

7 unexpected difficulty in reading for an individual 

8 who has the intelligence to be a much better reader, 

9 most commonly caused by a difficulty in the phono10 logical processing (the appreciation of the individual 

11 sounds of spoken language), which affects the ability 

12 of an individual to speak, read, and spell.’’; and 

13 (3) in paragraph (30)— 

14 (A) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘dys15 lexia,’’; and 

16 (B) in subparagraph (C)— 

17 (i) by striking ‘‘or of’’ and inserting 

18 ‘‘of’’; and 

19 (ii) by inserting before the period the 

20 following: ‘‘, or of dyslexia’’. 

21 (b) PROVISION OF ACCOMMODATIONS AND SERV22 ICES.—The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act is 

23 amended by inserting after section 608 (20 U.S.C. 1407) 

24 the following: 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3302 IS

1 ‘‘SEC. 608A. PROVISION OF ACCOMMODATIONS AND SERV2 ICES. 

3 ‘‘In determining eligibility for, or providing, an ac4 commodation or service under this title, a local educational 

5 agency or other agency shall provide equal access, to the 

6 accommodation or service, to— 

7 ‘‘(1) children from low-income families or from 

8 families with low socioeconomic status; and 

9 ‘‘(2) other children.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Skip to main content

# Social Security

Search
Menu
Español
Sign in

## Direct deposit of Social Security benefits

Office of the Chief Actuary 

Benefit payment reports

Trust fund data

     The graph below shows the percentage of Social Security benefit amounts     paid by direct deposit     to financial institutions.  We show not only such      percentages for all payments, but we also show percentages applicable to      cycle 1 (third-of-month) payments and cycles 2, 3, 4 payments      (corresponding to payments made on the 2nd,      3rd, and 4th Wednesdays of      each month).  Cyclical payments began in      June 1997, and the graph below begins with percentages for that month.

     The graph shows that as of September 2017, for those receiving payments on the      2nd, 3rd,      and 4th Wednesdays of each month,     over 99 percent of their benefit payments are paid with direct deposit.       This percentage grew slowly from 2001 through the beginning of 2011.      Beginning in May 2011, the percentage grew faster due to a Department of      Treasury requirement to receive Federal payments via direct deposit for      individuals filing for benefits in May 2011 and later, and for all beneficiaries     beginning March 2013. The graph also shows that the cycle 1 percentage grew     similarly since May 2011 for the same reason. This percentage grew steadily,      though at a slower rate after 1998 through April 2011.

     The line representing the percentage for all payments lies between     the other two lines.  While initially indistinguishable from the cycle-1     payment percentage line, the line for all payments slowly diverged     from the cycle-1 line until early 2010 as a growing percentage of      beneficiaries received their benefits on the 2nd,     3rd, or 4th Wednesdays of each month.     Beginning in May 2011, these lines slowly converged, at an increasing rate through early 2013.     Since early 2013, the percentages have remained fairly steady.

Note: The monthly direct-deposit percentages shown in the above graph can be      seen by selecting the "cyclical payment" report      for both trust funds combined.

Footer menu
Order filed January 5, 2017 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-00719-CV

____________

HENRY GUERRA, SR., REBECCA GOMEZ GUERRA, MICHAEL 

GUERRA, BLANCA GUAJARDO, ESTHER GOMEZ TRISTAN, 

LINDA RUTH GARZA, AND LAURO GARZA, Appellants

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 80th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2014-70768

O R D E R

This is an appeal from a judgment signed June 10, 2016. Appellants timely 

filed a post-judgment motion. The notice of appeal was due September 8, 2016. See 

Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. Appellants, however, filed their notice of appeal on September 

12, 2016, a date within 15 days of the due date for the notice of appeal. A motion for 

extension of time is necessarily implied when the perfecting instrument is filed 

within 15 days of its due date. Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). 
2

Appellants did not file a motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal. While an 

extension may be implied, appellants are still obligated to come forward with a 

reasonable explanation to support the late filing. See Miller v. Greenpark Surgery 

Center Assocs., Ltd., 974 S.W.2d 805, 808 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, 

no pet.). 

Accordingly, we ORDER appellants to file a proper motion to extend time to 

file the notice of appeal by January 15, 2017. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3;10.5(b). If 

appellants do not comply with this order, we will dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.3.

PER CURIAM
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION I, Jeffry Ciongoli, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the Corporate Backed Callable Trust Certificates, J.C. Penney Debenture-Backed Series 2007-1 Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports"); 2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light  of  the  circumstances  under  which  such  statements  were  made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to  the  period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing, or similar, agreement in all material respects; and 5. All  of  the  reports  on  assessment  of  compliance  with  servicing  criteria  for  asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee. Date: March 27, 2020 By:  /s/ Jeffry Ciongoli               Name:    Jeffry Ciongoli Title:   Vice President and Assistant Treasurer   (Senior Officer in charge of securitization of the Depositor)       ****
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

January 8, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 135004 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 135004 

 COA: 277969 

Macomb CC:2001-002583-FC 

DAVONNE ANDRE LUDY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the orders of the Court of 

Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question 

presented should be reviewed by this Court. For purposes of MCR 6.502(G)(1), the 

Court notes that contrary to the Court of Appeals characterization of the defendant’s 

application as a motion for relief from judgment, the defendant filed an application for 

leave to appeal that should have been denied for lack of merit in the grounds presented. 

d1217 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 8, 2008 

Clerk
#### STATE v. CLAUDE E. WILLIE and JAMES O. WILLIE.

(Filed 30 September, 1925.)

Appeal by defendants from *Barnhill, J.,*at March Term, 1925, of JoNes. No error.

The defendants were indicted for an assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill and the infliction of serious injury not resulting in death in breach of C. S., 4214. The jury returned for their verdict, “Guilty of an assault with a deadly weapon.” From the judgment pronounced the defendants appealed.

*Attorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.*

*H. A. Tolson, JD. H. Willis and Ward & Ward for the defendants.*

Pee CueiaM.

The defendants entered of record a number of exceptions addressed to the admission and exclusion of evidence and the instructions given the jury. We have examined each of them and find no reversible error.

No error.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 235 (Thursday, December 7, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62882-62883]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-29853]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[ES-960-1420-00; ES-47708, Group 155, Wisconsin]


Notice of Filing of Plat of Survey; Wisconsin

    The plat of the survey of an island in Lake Michigan, Township 30 
North, Range 28 East, Fourth Principal Meridian, Wisconsin, will be 
officially filed in Eastern States, Springfield, Virginia at 7:30 a.m., 
on January 11, 1996. The survey was made at the request of the Deputy 
State Director, Resources Planning, Use and Protection, Eastern States, 
Bureau of Land Management.
    All inquiries or protests concerning the technical aspects of the 
survey must be sent to the Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Eastern States, 
Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 
22153, prior to 7:30 a.m., January 11, 1996.
    Copies of the plat will be made available upon request and 
prepayment 

[[Page 62883]]
of the reproduction fee of $2.75 per copy.

    Dated: November 30, 1995.
Stephen G. Kopach,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor.
[FR Doc. 95-29853 Filed 12-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2


      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  NewCom  International,  Inc.,  a
Delaware corporation,  (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June
30,  2003,  as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date
hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Walter  Grieves,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the
Company,  certify the following  pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

         1.       The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information  contained in the report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Walter Grieves
---------------------------------------
Walter Grieves, Chief Executive Officer
October 23, 2003
Hon. 0. N. Humphreys, Jr. 

Administrator 

Texas Alcoholic Beverage 

Commission 

Capitol Station 

Austin, Texas 78711 

Dear Mr. Humphreys: 

Opinion No.M-583 

Re: Whether the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission 

may utilize part of the 

funds specified in Item 19 

of its appropriations for 

construction of a revenue 

station at Eagle Pass. 

You have requested the opinion of this office regarding 

the above question. In this connection, we note that the 

General Appropriation Bill for the 1970-71 Biennium, in 

Item 19 of its appropriations for the Alcoholic Beverage Commission, provides as follows: 

"19. For the construction of revenue 

stations along the international boundary, 

$28,000." 

A rider found in the appropriation bill on page III-16 

reads, in part, as follows? 

"It is the intent of the Legislature that 

the funds appropriated above in Item 19 shall 

be expended for the construction, maintenance, 

and operation of revenue stations along the international boundary at~Los Ebanos, Rio Grande City, 

Amistad Dam, Fabens, and Presidio, provided that 

in addition to the regular operating week, *..I) 

(Emphasis supplied.) 

-2781- 
Hon. 0. N. Humphreys, page 2 (M-583) 

In your opinion request you advised that careful investigation 

and evaluation by your staff had established that a serious need 

for a revenue station existed at Eagle Pass, and that the need 

for such, a station at Amistad Dam was comparatively small. YOU 

also advised that there is no convenient source of liquor supply 

at present on the Mexican side of Amistad Dam and that the 

traffic was relatively light. 

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the above quoted appropriation 

rider expressly limits the purposes for which Item 19 funds may 

be expended. This limitation is within the power of the Legislature. Your agency would have the authority to determine that 

a revenue station at Amistad Dam should not be constructed out 

of the funds presently allocated, but the agency would have no 

authority to transfer the funds to a use other than that specifically directed by the Legislature. Attorney General's Opinions 

C-21 (1963) and O-5545 (1943). 

You are accordingly advised that it is the opinion of this 

office that the Alcoholic Beverage Commission does not have the 

authority to construct a revenue station at Eagle Pass, Texas 

from the funds appropriated in Item 19 of the agency's appropriation. 

SUMMARY 

In constructing new revenue stations along 

the international border with Mexico, the Texas 

Alcoholic Beverage Commission is limited to 

construction of those stations expressly 

enumerated by the Legislature in the Appropriation Bill. 

You&ery truly, 

Attor@ General of Texas 

Prepared by Malcolm L. Quick 

Assistant Attorney General 

-2782- 
Hon. 0. N. Humphreys, page 3 (M-58,3) 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COMMITTEE 

Kerns Taylor, Chairman 

W. E. Allen, Acting Co-Chairman 

Terry Reed Goodman 

Glenn Brown 

Bennie Bock 

Ronald Carr 

MEADE F. GRIFFIN 

Staff Legal Assistant 

ALFRED WALKER 

Executive Assistant 

NOLA WHITE 

First Assistant 

-2783-
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 242 (Monday, December 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 65062]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30557]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-5346-8]


Public Meeting of the Sanitary Sewer Overflows Dialogue

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Environmental Protection 
Agency (EPA) is convening a public meeting of the Sanitary Sewer 
Overflows (SSOs) Dialogue. The meeting will be held on January 11 and 
12, 1996. The purposes of the meeting are to discuss: (1) The draft SSO 
framework; (2) permit and compliance priorities; and (3) the overall 
SSO strategy flowchart. The meeting is open to the public without need 
for advance registration.

DATES: The SSO meeting will be held on January 11 and 12, 1996. On 
January 11, the meeting will run from 8:30 am to 5:00 pm EST. On 
January 12, the meeting will run from about 8:30 am until completion.

ADDRESSES: The SSO meeting will be held at the Crystal Gateway Marriott 
Hotel, 1700 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, Virginia. The telephone 
numbers for the hotel are: 1-800-228-9290, or (703) 920-3230.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lam Lim of EPA's Office of Wastewater 
Management, at (202) 260-7371.

    Dated: December 8, 1995.
Michael B. Cook,
Director, Office of Wastewater Management, Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 95-30557 Filed 12-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P