alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 238 (Tuesday, December 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 63737]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30229]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Collection of Information Submitted for OMB Review

    In compliance with the requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, on October 4, 19985, Federal Register 
No. 192, page 52024, the National Science Foundation (NSF) published, 
for public comment, a proposed collection of information, ``Survey of 
Industrial Research and Development, 1995-97.'' No public comments were 
received. The collection of information is now being forwarded to the 
Office of Management and Budget for consideration. To request more 
information on the proposed project or to obtain a copy of the data 
collection plans and instruments, call Herman Fleming, NSF Clearance 
Officer at (703) 306-1243, or send comments to: National Science 
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 485, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Written comments should be received by January 5, 1995.
    Abstract: This survey measures the amount and indicates the 
direction of R&D expenditures by U.S. industry, Government agencies, 
corporations, academic researchers, trade associations, research 
organizations, and others use the survey statistics to analyze and 
forecast technological growth, investigate productivity determinants, 
formulate tax policies, and compare individual company performance with 
industry averages.
    Companies with known R&D activity and samples of companies in 
selected industries that may conduct R&D are included.

Dated: December 7, 1995.
Herman G. Fleming,
NSF Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-30229 Filed 12-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
EXHIBIT
10.1

     

    

    


    July 29,
2009

    


    Dr. Robin
L. Smith

    930 Fifth
Avenue

    Suite
8H

    New York,
NY  10021

    


    Dear
Robin:

    


    This
letter is being written to serve as an amendment to the employment agreement by
and between you and NeoStem, Inc. (the “Company”) dated as of May 26, 2006 (as
amended on each of January 26, 2007, September 27, 2007, January 9, 2008 and
August 29, 2008) pursuant to which you serve as the Company’s Chairman of the
Board and Chief Executive Officer (the “Agreement”).  Except as set
forth herein, the Agreement shall remain unchanged.  Initially
capitalized terms used herein but not defined herein shall have the meaning set
forth in the Agreement.

    


    1.  Extension of
Term.

    The Term
of the Agreement is hereby extended from December 31, 2010 to December 31,
2011.

    


    2.  Cash
Bonus.

    You shall
be paid a cash bonus on October 1st of each
of 2009, 2010 and 2011.  For 2009, the bonus shall be payable subject
to the Company’s consummation of its proposed merger with China
Biopharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc. and shall be in the amount of $275,000 and for
2010 and 2011 such cash bonus shall be for comparable minimum
amounts.

    


    Very
truly yours,

    
      
        
          
            
              
                
                  
                    
                      
                        
                          
                            
                              
                                
                                  
                                    
                                      
                                        	 	 	 	 	 	 
	NeoStem,
      Inc.	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By: 	
                                                 

                                              	 	 	
                                                 

                                              	 
	Name:  	
                                                Richard
      Berman

                                              	 	 	
                                                 

                                              	 
	Title: 	
                                                Chair,
      Compensation Committee

                                              	 	 	
                                                 

                                              	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Accepted
      and Agreed:	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Robin
      Smith
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Office of the Secretary

# ACTION:

Notice; Correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Department of Labor published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         of December 28, 2015, inviting public comments on the Institutional Analysis of American Job Centers Study Information Collection Request (80 FR 80814). The document contained an incorrect date.                    

      ( print page 5792)    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Contact Michel Smyth by telephone at 202-693-4129 (this is not a toll-free number) or by email to                         *DOL_PRA_PUBLIC@dol.gov*.                    

## Correction

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of December 28, 2015, in FR Doc. 2015-32625, on page 80814, (80 FR 80814) in the first column, correct the                         **DATES**                         caption to read:                    

# DATES:

The OMB will consider all written comments that agency receives on or before February 11, 2016.

Dated: January 21, 2016.

Michel Smyth,

Departmental Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. 2016-01898 Filed 2-2-16; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4510-04-P
#### S. F. PACE, Administrator of HAYWOOD M. PACE, v. RELIABLE TRANSPORT COMPANY, a Corporation.

(Filed 22 November, 1939.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *Sinclair, J.,*at March Term, 1939, of FRANKLIN.

Civil action to recover for alleged wrongful death. C. S., 161.

Judgment as in case of nonsuit entered at close of evidence for plaintiff, who appeals to Supreme Court and assigns error.

*Yarborough & Yarborough and Chas. P. Green for plaintiff, appellant.*

*Douglass & Douglass for defendant, appellee.*

Per Curiam.

The evidence adduced on the trial below, as shown in record on this' appeal, taken in the light most favorable to plaintiff, leads unerringly to the conclusion that the untimely death of the intestate was the result of an unavoidable accident- for which the defendant is not liable.

The judgment below is

Affirmed.
Exhibit
23.3








CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT ENGINEERS





As
independent engineering consultants, Ryder Scott Company, LP hereby consents to
the use of our report entitled “Southwest Royalties, Inc., Estimated Future
Reserves and Income Attributable to Certain Leasehold and Royalty Interests, SEC
Parameters, as of December 31, 2008” dated February 20, 2009 and data
extracted therefrom (and all references to our Firm) included in or made a part
of this Form 10-K Annual Report to be filed on or about March 13, 2009 and
to the incorporation by reference of this Form 10-K Annual Report (including the
use of our report and references to our Firm herein) into that certain
Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed by Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, file number 333-116825, and those
certain Registration Statements on Form S-8 filed by Clayton Williams Energy,
Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission, file numbers 33-68320,
33-68318, 33-68316, 33-69688, and 33-92834 covering the Bonus Incentive Plan of
Clayton Williams Energy, Inc., 1993 Stock Compensation Plan of Clayton Williams
Energy, Inc., Outside Directors Stock Option Plan of Clayton Williams Energy,
Inc., Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. 401(k) Plan & Trust, and the Executive
Incentive Stock Compensation Plan of Clayton Williams Energy, Inc.,
respectively.

















RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, LP





Houston,
Texas


March 10,
2009
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 242 (Monday, December 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65063-65064]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30667]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Office of the Secretary
[Program Announcement 13655.911]


Grants to Indian Tribal Organizations for Supportive and 
Nutritional Services for Older Indians

AGENCY: Administrtion on Aging (AoA), OS.

ACTION: Extension of deadline to apply for funds under the Older 
Americans Act, Title VI, Grants for Native Americans, Part A--Indian 
Program.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Due to the recent shut down of many components of the Federal 
government, including the AoA, the Administration is extending the date 
for which the Title VI grant applications for the grant period April 1, 
1996-March 31, 1999 are due.

DATES: All applications must be received or postmarked on or before 
December 20, 1995.

[[Page 65064]]

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Your local AoA Regional Administration 
as listed in the original Federal Register announcement dated September 
6, 1995 on pages 46283-46287.
Fernando M. Torres-Gil,
Assistant Secretary for Aging.
[FR Doc. 95-30667 Filed 12-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4130-01-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC,

Respondent

v.

DEBORAH AND MARK LEWIS,

Petitioners

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 298 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2nd day of January, 2019, the “Pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule 

2501(a), Appellant Request Leave for Post Trial Submission Communication” and Petition 

for Allowance of Appeal are DENIED.
#### Veronica Hegeman, Appellant, v Craig Bedford, Respondent.

[774 NYS2d 769]

In an action, inter alia, for specific performance of a stipulation to execute a contract for the sale of real property, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dowd, J.), dated January 9, 2003, which denied her motions for a preliminary injunction and summary judgment, and granted the defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff contends that she was entitled to specific performance of a stipulation to execute a contract for the sale of real property because the stipulation did not make time of the essence and the defendant’s subsequent unilateral notice of when the contract was to be executed did not give her a reasonable amount of time to execute the contract. This contention is without merit.

While the question of what constitutes a reasonable time is usually a question of fact, where the facts are undisputed, what is a reasonable time becomes a question of law, and the case is appropriate for summary judgment *(see Spagna v Licht,*87 AD2d 626 [1982]). Whether a party was given reasonable time to perform the contract depends upon the nature, purpose, and circumstances of each case *(see Ben Zev v Merman,*73 NY2d 781, 783 [1988]). Factors relevant to such an inquiry include the nature and object of the contract, the previous conduct of the *633parties, the presence or absence of good faith, the experience of the parties, the possibility of prejudice or hardship to either one, and the specific number of days provided for performance *(see Ben Zev v Merman, supra).*Here, in opposition to the defendant’s prima facie showing of entitlement to summary judgment, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the time given to execute the contract was unreasonable. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

The plaintiffs remaining contentions either are academic in light of our determination or without merit. Ritter, J.P., S. Miller, Goldstein and Adams, JJ., concur.
#### Alice Connery, as Administratrix, etc., Appellant, v. Michael Slavin, Respondent.

New trial granted, costs to abide the event.

Opinion by

Bockes, J.;

Landon, J., dissents in opinion.
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 19 (Friday, January 29, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 5016]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-01697]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; ADNI-3.
    Date: February 24, 2016.
    Time: 12:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, Suite 
2C212, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Alexander Parsadanian, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building 2C212, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-9666, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fb8b9a89889a9f9a95929a959abb95929ad5959293d59c948d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4e3e2f3c3d2f2a2f20272f202f0e20272f6020272660292138">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

     Dated: January 25, 2016.
Melanie J. Gray,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-01697 Filed 1-28-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3370 

To release the reversionary interest of the United States in certain nonFederal land in Salt Lake City, Utah, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 9, 2021 

Mr. LEE (for himself and Mr. ROMNEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To release the reversionary interest of the United States 

in certain non-Federal land in Salt Lake City, Utah, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘University of Utah 

5 Research Park Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3370 IS

1 SEC. 2. RELEASE OF REVERSIONARY INTEREST OF THE 

2 UNITED STATES IN NON-FEDERAL LAND IN 

3 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH. 

4 (a) RELEASE.—There is released to the University of 

5 Utah, without consideration, the reversionary interest of 

6 the United States in the non-Federal land described in 

7 subsection (b). 

8 (b) DESCRIPTION OF NON-FEDERAL LAND.—The 

9 non-Federal land referred to in subsection (a) is the ap10 proximately 593 acres of land of the University of Utah— 

11 (1) identified in the patent— 

12 (A) numbered 43–99–0012; and 

13 (B) dated October 18, 1968; and 

14 (2) more particularly described as tracts D (ex15 cluding the parcels numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5), G, 

16 and J, T. 1 S., R. 1 E., Salt Lake Meridian. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
#### STATE v. CHARLEY BEAL et al.

(Filed 19 December, 1930.)

Receiving Stolen Goods D c — A verdict failing to find that defendant knew goods to be stolen at time of receiving is defective.

Where the defendants are tried for storebreaking, larceny and receiving stolen property, and a verdict of guilty on the last count is rendered without a finding that the defendants knew the goods to be stolen at the time of receiving them, the verdict is fatally defective, and the defendants’ motions, aptly made, to set aside the verdict or in arrest of judgment should be allowed, and a *venire de novo*will be ordered on appeal when the motions have been denied.

Appeal by defendants from *Finley, J.,*at March-April Term, 1930, of Cherokee.

*Venire de novo.*

This is a criminal action in which defendants were tried on an indictment for storebreaking, larceny and receiving stolen goods, knowing same to have been stolen.

The verdict returned by the jury as shown by the record was as follows: “All of the defendants guilty on the third count, of having these goods in their possession, knowing them to have been stolen. Not guilty as to breaking and entering, and for larceny.” From judgment on the verdict, defendants appealed to the Supreme Court.

*91*Attorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.*

*Dillard & Hill and Moody & Moody for defendants.*

Per Otjeiam.

After tbe return of tbe verdict as shown by tbe record, defendants and eacb of them moved that tbe same be set aside. This motion was overruled and defendants excepted. Defendants then moved in arrest of judgment. This motion was overruled and defendants again excepted. Their assignments of error based on these exceptions must be sustained. *S. v. Barbee,*197 N. C., 248, 148 S. E., 249, and cases there cited.

On the record the defendants are entitled to a *venire de novo.*It is so ordered.

*Venire de novo.*
#### Elizabeth C. Buchanan and others. Respondents, v. Mary Millen, Appellant, Impleaded, etc.

Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Daniels, J.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3374 

To reauthorize the COPS ON THE BEAT grant program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 9, 2021 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself, Ms. MURKOWSKI, and Mr. COONS) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the COPS ON THE BEAT grant program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘COPS Reauthorization 

5 Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF COPS ON THE BEAT GRANT 

7 PROGRAM. 

8 Section 1001(a)(11)(A) of title I of the Omnibus 

9 Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 

10 10261(a)(11)(A)) is amended by striking 

11 ‘‘$1,047,119,000 for each of fiscal years 2006 through 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3374 IS

1 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘$651,000,000 for each of fiscal 

2 years 2022 through 2027’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                          21,700
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    220,564
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          19,406
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 284,789
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        165,123
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            69
<OTHER-SE>                                      81,423
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   284,789
<SALES>                                        321,543
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               332,088
<CGS>                                          278,815
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  278,815
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                39,572
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,701
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,206
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,495
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,495
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.03
        

</TABLE>
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-3100

VIVIAN J. BLAHA,

Petitioner,

v.

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT,

Respondent.

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in DA0831070068-B-1.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Vivian J. Blaha moves to reinstate her petition for review and for an extension of

time to file her brief.

Blaha's petition was dismissed for failure to file a Fed. Cir. R. 15(c) statement

concerning discrimination. The statement has now been filed.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motions will be granted, the mandate will be recalled, and the dismissal

order will be vacated, if Blaha files her brief within 21 days of the date of this order.

FOR THE COURT

MAR 10 2009

/s/ Jan Horbalv

Date Jan Horbaly

Clerk 	U.S. CB	

orIL ED

OF APPEALS FOR

THR	EFtAL CIRCUIT

cc:	Afton Jane Izen, Esq.

Matthew H. Solomson, Esq. MAR 1 0 2009

s8
EXHIBIT 23.1CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No. 333-130082 on FormS-8 of CSB Bancorp, Inc. and in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of The Commercial & SavingsBank of Millersburg Profit Sharing and 401(k) Savings Retirement Plan and Trust of our report datedFebruary 28, 2007, relating to our audit of the consolidated financial statements included in theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of CSB Bancorp, Inc. for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005.                                                            /s/ S.R.SNODGRASS A.C.   S.R. SNODGRASS A.C.      Wexford, Pennsylvania