alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members         
    -  AEE Multimedia 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# Tenets of Responsible Behavior in Space

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

## Related Documents

TENETS OF RESPONSIBLE BEHAVIOR IN SPACE OSD071107-21 RES FINAL.PDF
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In re:

Pacific Gas & Electric Corp., et al.

 Debtors.

Chapter 11

Case No. 19-30088 Chapter 11

(Jointly Administered)

PARTIAL TRANSFER OF CLAIM OTHER THAN FOR SECURITY

A CLAIM HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS CASE or deemed filed under 11 U.S.C. § 

1111(a). Transferee hereby gives evidence and notice pursuant to Rule 3001(e)(2) of the Federal 

Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure of the transfer, other than for security, of the claim referenced in 

this evidence and notice.

Cenveo Worldwide Limited

Name of Transferor

Phone: (812) 981-4854

Last Four Digits of Acct #: N/A

Name and Address where notices and 

payments to transferee should be sent:

Whitebox Relative Value Partners, LP

c/o Whitebox Advisors

3033 Excelsior Blvd, Suite 300

Minneapolis, MN 55416-4675

Attn: Scott Specken

Whitebox Relative Value Partners, LP

Name of Transferee

Phone: (612) 253-6061

Last Four Digits of Acct #: N/A

Claim No: 1570

Debtor: Pacific Gas and Electric Company 

(19-30089)

Date Filed: March 21, 2019

Total Amount of Claim: $280,779.20

Transferred Amount of Claim: 

$247,674.14 (Admin. Priority)

I declare under penalty of perjury that the information provided in this notice is true and correct 

to the best of my knowledge and belief.

By:______________________________ Date: November 11, 2019

Transferee/Transferee’s Agent

Penalty for making a false statement: Fine of up to $500,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years, 

or both. 18 U.S.C. 152 & 3571.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 9EC4B9BC-BB4D-4527-8FBE-F76CD82F7E69

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4660 Filed: 11/11/19 Entered: 11/11/19 15:36:25 Page 1 of

1
#### Same v. Same

—Orders affirmed, without costs to either party.
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 240 (Thursday, December 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 64159]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30486]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Partnership Council Meeting

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense (DoD) announces a meeting of the 
Defense Partnership Council. Notice of this meeting is required under 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act. This meeting is open to the public. 
The topics to be covered are partnership successes within DoD and 
action items related to the Defense Partnership Council Plan of Action.

DATE: The meeting is to be held Wednesday, January 17, 1996, in room 
1E801, Conference Room 4, the Pentagon, from 1:00 p.m. until 3:00 p.m. 
Comments should be received by January 12, 1996, in order to be 
considered at the January 17 meeting.

ADDRESSES: We invite interested persons and organizations to submit 
written comments or recommendations. Mail or deliver your comments or 
recommendations to Mr. Kenneth Oprisko at the address shown below. 
Seating is limited and available on a first-come, first-served basis 
Individuals wishing to attend who do not possess an appropriate 
Pentagon building pass should call the below listed telephone number to 
obtain instructions for entry into the Pentagon. Handicapped 
individuals wishing to attend should also call the below listed 
telephone number to obtain appropriate accommodations.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Kenneth Oprisko, Chief, Labor Relations Branch, Field Advisory 
Services Division, Defense Civilian Personnel Management Service, 1400 
Key Blvd., Suite B-200, Arlington, VA 22209-5144, (703) 696-6301, ext. 
704.

    Dated: December 11, 1995.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 95-30486 Filed 12-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
```
[Cite as Conley v. Conley, 2013-Ohio-4309.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT 

LAKE COUNTY, OHIO 

LISA M. CONLEY, : MEMORANDUM OPINION

 Plaintiff-Appellant, :

CASE NO. 2013-L-074

 - vs - :

SEAN CONLEY, :

 Defendant-Appellee. :

Civil Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Domestic Relations Division, Case No. 

10 DR 788. 

Judgment: Appeal dismissed. 

Thomas A. McCormack, McCormack Family Law, 1915 The Superior Building, 815 

Superior Avenue, East, Cleveland, OH 44114 (For Plaintiff-Appellant). 

Linda D. Cooper, Cooper & Forbes, 166 Main Street, Painesville, OH 44077-3403 (For 

Defendant-Appellee). 

COLLEEN MARY O’TOOLE, J. 

{¶1} On August 8, 2013, appellant, Lisa M. Conley, by and through counsel, 

filed a notice of appeal from a July 8, 2013 entry of the Lake County Court of Common 

Pleas, Domestic Relations Division. The notice of appeal was due on July 7, 2013, 

which was not a holiday or a weekend. 

{¶2} App.R. 4(A) states that: 

{¶3} “A party shall file the notice of appeal required by App.R. 3 within thirty 

days of the later of entry of the judgment or order appealed or, in a civil case, service of 
2

the notice of judgment and its entry if service is not made on the party within the three 

day rule period in Rule 58(B) of the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure.” 

{¶4} Loc.R. 3(D)(2) of the Eleventh District Court of Appeals provides: 

{¶5} In the filing of a Notice of Appeal in civil cases in which the trial 

court clerk has not complied with Ohio Civ.R. 58(B), and the Notice 

of Appeal is deemed to be filed out of rule, appellant shall attach an 

affidavit from the trial court clerk stating that service was not 

perfected pursuant to Ohio App.R. 4(A). The clerk shall then 

perfect service and furnish this court with a copy of the appearance 

docket in which date of service has been noted. Lack of 

compliance shall result in the sua sponte dismissal of the appeal 

under Ohio App.R. 4(A). (Emphasis sic.) 

{¶6} Here, appellant has not complied with the 30-day rule set forth in App.R. 

4(A) nor alleged that there was a failure by the trial court clerk to comply with Civ.R. 

58(B). Appellant has not submitted an affidavit from the trial court clerk pursuant to 

Loc.R. 3(D)(2). The time requirement is jurisdictional in nature and may not be enlarged 

by an appellate court. State ex rel. Pendell v. Adams Cty. Bd. of Elections, 40 Ohio 

St.3d 58, 60 (1988); see also App.R. 14(B). 

{¶7} Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, pursuant to App.R. 

4(A). 

CYNTHIA WESTCOTT RICE, J., 

THOMAS R. WRIGHT, J., 

concur.
EX-35.1
GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING, INC.

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

MANA 2007-A1

I, Michael Gathright, an authorized officer of GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc.
(the "Servicer"), certify that:

1. A review of the Servicer's activities during the period from and including
January 1, 2007 through and including December 31, 2007 (or applicable portion
thereof) and of the Servicer's performance under the applicable servicing
agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material
respects throughout such period.

Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings ascribed to them
in the Agreement.

Date: February 29, 2008
/s/ Michael Gathright
Michael Gathright
Senior Vice President, Loan Administration
Exhibit
32


CERTIFICATION
 OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT
 TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
 connection with the report on Form 10-Q ofSolar
 Energy Limitedfor thequarterly
 period endedSeptember 30, 2009
 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,Michael
 James Gobuty, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906
 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | (1) | Thisreport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in this report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the registrant at the end of the period covered by this report and results of operations of the registrant
for the period covered by this report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: November
 13, 2009



/s/
 Michael James Gobuty

Michael
 James Gobuty

Chief
 Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



Thiscertification
 accompanies this report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
 except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the
 registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this report),
 irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.   A signed original of this written
 statement required by §906 has been provided to the registrant
 and will be retained by the registrant
 and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



27
## Estimates Under the 2024 Trustees Report

- Office of the Chief Actuary
- Trustees Reports
- Cost-of-living adjustments
- Average Wage Index

2024 Trustees Report
        The AWI is used to index an individual's earnings through age 60        in the benefit calculation formula, and the COLA is used to increase benefits        annually.  The COLA shown for a year is effective for December of        that year, but is payable in January of the following year.	  

| Calendar year | COLA(percent) | Increase inAWI (percent)                                                                                                                                                |
|---------------|---------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2023          | 3.2a          | 3.8                                                                                                                                                                     |
| 2024          | 2.6           | 3.8                                                                                                                                                                     |
| 2025          | 2.2           | 3.62026 2.44.02027 2.44.320282.44.620292.44.420302.44.320312.44.420322.44.420332.44.0
a Actual amount, as determined under automatic-adjustment provisions.
Footer menu |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 22 (Wednesday, February 3, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5726-5727]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-01981]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


DOE Response to Recommendation 2015-1 of the Defense Nuclear 
Facilities Safety Board, Emergency Preparedness and Response at the 
Pantex Plant

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On November 24, 2015, the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety 
Board transmitted Recommendation 2015-1, Emergency Preparedness and 
Response at the Pantex Plant, to the Department of Energy. In 
accordance with section 315(c) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 
amended, 42 U.S.C. 2286d(c), the following represents the Secretary of 
Energy's response to the Recommendation.

DATES: Comments, data, views, or arguments concerning the Secretary's 
response are due on or before March 4, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Please send to: Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, 625 
Indiana Avenue NW., Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Dale Govan, Office of the 
Departmental Representative to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety 
Board, Office of Environment, Health, Safety and

[[Page 5727]]

Security, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., 
Washington, DC 20585.

    Issued in Washington, DC on January 27, 2016.
Joe Olencz,
Departmental Representative to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety 
Board, Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security.
January 13, 2016
The Honorable Joyce L. Connery
Chairman
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board
625 Indiana Avenue NW, Suite 700
Washington, DC 20004

Dear Madam Chairman:

The Department of Energy (DOE) acknowledges receipt of Defense Nuclear 
Facilities Safety Board (Board) Recommendation 2015-1, Emergency 
Preparedness and Response at the Pantex Plant, which was published in 
the Federal Register on December 3, 2015.

The Department shares the Board's view that actions are needed to 
improve emergency preparedness and response at Pantex. DOE accepts 
Recommendation 2015-1, which complements improvement actions that the 
National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) has already taken at 
Pantex as part of the Implementation Plan for Recommendation 2014-1, 
Emergency Preparedness and Response.

We appreciate the Board's perspective and look forward to our continued 
interaction on preparing the Pantex Implementation Plan. Additionally, 
we appreciate the Board's consideration and incorporation of the 
Department's comments into Recommendation 2015-1. I have assigned 
Geoffrey L. Beausoleil, Manager, NNSA Production Office, to be the 
Department's Responsible Manager for this Recommendation.

If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Geoffrey L. Beausoleil at 
(865) 576-0752

Sincerely,

Ernest J. Moniz

[FR Doc. 2016-01981 Filed 2-2-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
No. 981,

October Term, 1961.

#### McCue et al. *v.*United States,

370 U. S. 939. Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing denied.

Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
American Eels      - Biology
      - Susquehanna
      - Research
      - News
      -  Eels in the Classroom          - About Eels in the Classroom
        - Resources
        - Timeline
        - Frequently Asked Questions
        - Story Map
        - Contact 

Home ** Our Work ** American Eels **In the Classroom

# Eels in the Classroom

Eels in the Classroom (EIC) is an experimental, small-scale environmental education opportunity provided by theSusquehanna River Basin Commission.Headed by fisheries biologist Aaron Henning, the program provides juvenileAmerican eels to educators to raise in their classrooms and ultimately releaseback into theSusquehanna River.The EIC project partners with other natural resource agencies and the operators of Conowingo Dam who have been collectively working to bringeels back to their native waters. Students learn about the value and importance of migratory fish through the ecosystem functions they perform.

###### Participants

In 2018, the first EIC program included two participants: Lewisburg Area High School and the Bradford County Conservation District. Since then the program has grown by word of mouth to include participants in the table below. If you are interested in participating in the EIC program, please fill out the form at https://www.srbc.gov/our-work/american-eels/contact.html.

*Lewisburg High School*
*Abington Heights High School*

The Vernal School Environmental Education Partnership has taken the Eels in the Classroom experience to a whole new level with a 24/7 live eel camera at the Montour Preserve in Danville, PA. This livestream offers a great opportunity for virtual learners to see elvers up close from any location. Special thanks to Vernal School staff, The Middle Susquehanna Riverkeeper Association, the Montour Area Recreation Commission and Fessler IT Consulting for creating and maintaining this unique opportunity.

For more information please visit The Vernal School’s website.
## Redetermination of reduced Social Security disability benefits

- Office of the Chief Actuary  
- Automatic determinations 
- Average wage indexing series

The Social Security Act requires that the total family benefits of a disability beneficiary be reduced for receipt of certain public disability benefits (such as Workers' Compensation). Section 224(f) of the Act further requires a benefit redetermination effective for January of the third year after the year when the reduction was first required, and triennially thereafter. 

Redetermination of such benefits depends on the average wage index—the same index used to compute Social Security benefits under sections 215(a) and (b) of the Social Security Act.  In a redetermination, ratios of such average wage indexes are applied to a beneficiary's "average current earnings."

Ratios used to redetermine benefits are provided in tables for a selected year

**Select offset year:** 1976           1977           1978           1979           1980           1981           1982           1983           1984           1985           1986           1987           1988           1989           1990           1991           1992           1993           1994           1995           1996           1997           1998           1999           2000           2001           2002           2003           2004           2005           2006           2007           2008           2009           2010           2011               2012           2013               2014               2015               2016           2017           2018               2019		   2020             2021                                         Footer menu
EX-33.8
(logo) WestLake
SETTLEMENT SERVICES


Mark J. Girasole
President


ANNUAL ASSESSMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE


The Tax Outsourcing Service Agreement dated as of October 1, 2006 (together with
all amendments thereto, the "Agreement"), between Aurora Loan Services and
WestLake Settlement Services, LLC.

I, Mark Girasole, the president of WestLake Settlement Services, certify to
Aurora Loan Services, with the knowledge and intent that it will rely upon this
certification, that:

(1) As of and for the year ended December 31, 2007, WestLake Settlement
Services, LLC has complied with the applicable servicing criteria set forth in
Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB applicable to WestLake (the "Applicable
Servicing Criteria"):

1122(d)(4)(xi) Payments made on behalf of an obligor (such as tax or
insurance payments) are made on or before the related penalty or expiration
dates, as indicated on the appropriate bills or notices for such payments,
provided that such support has been received by the servicer at least 30
calendar days prior to these dates, or such other number of days specified in
the transaction agreements.

1122(d)(4)(xii) Any late payment penalties in connection with any payment to
be made on behalf of an obligor are paid from the servicer's funds and not
charged to the obligor, unless the late payment was due to the obligor's error
or omission.

WESTLAKE SETTLEMENT SERVICES


/s/ Mark Girasole
Mark Girasole, President
March 3, 2008


1 American Way * DFW 6-4-100 * Westlake, TX 76262 *T 817 699 5733 *
www.westlake.com
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

 DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

ROBERT MURDOCH AND 

AMY LEIGH MURDOCH, 

Appellants, 

v. Case No. 5D15-460

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., ET AL., 

Appellees. 

________________________________/

Opinion filed October 25, 2016

Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Orange County, 

John H. Adams, Senior Judge. 

Mark P. Stopa, of Stopa Law Firm, Tampa, 

for Appellants. 

W. A. Daniel, William D. Mueller and Elliot 

B. Kula, of Kula & Associates, P.A., for 

Appellee, Bank of America, N.A.. 

No Appearance for Other Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

See Bank of America, N.A. v. Siefker, No. 4D14-1923, (Fla. 4th DCA Oct. 13, 

2016); Deutsche Bank Nat’l Trust Co. v. Hagstrom, 41 Fla. L. Weekly D1671, (Fla. 2d

DCA Jul. 20, 2016). 

AFFIRMED.

TORPY, COHEN and BERGER, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Ephraim Kwok, the chief financial officer of Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited (the “Company”), certify for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,





|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|a. | the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|b. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: September 9, 2011





/s/    EPHRAIM KWOKEphraim KwokChief Financial Officer