alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5637 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5637

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an exclusion from 
          gross income for discharge of consumer indebtedness.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 18, 2014

 Mr. Peters of California (for himself and Mr. Vargas) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an exclusion from 
          gross income for discharge of consumer indebtedness.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Consumer Debt Forgiveness Tax Relief 
Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME FOR DISCHARGE OF CONSUMER 
              INDEBTEDNESS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 108(a) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``or'' at the end of 
subparagraph (D), by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (E) 
and inserting ``, or'', and by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(F) the indebtedness discharged is qualified 
                consumer indebtedness.''.
    (b) Special Rules Relating to Qualified Consumer Indebtedness.--
Section 108 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(j) Special Rules Relating to Qualified Consumer Indebtedness.--
            ``(1) Qualified consumer indebtedness defined.--For 
        purposes of this section, the term `qualified consumer 
        indebtedness' means any indebtedness of a natural person 
        arising out of a transaction in which the money, property, or 
        services which are the subject of the transaction are primarily 
        for personal, family, or household purposes.
            ``(2) Overall limitation.--The aggregate amount of 
        discharged indebtedness treated as qualified consumer 
        indebtedness for the taxable year shall not exceed the excess 
        (if any) of--
                    ``(A) $2,500, over
                    ``(B) the aggregate amounts treated as qualified 
                consumer indebtedness with respect to such taxpayer for 
                all prior taxable years.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to indebtedness discharged after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5676 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to ensure that members of a reserve 

component who are pursuing a course of education using educational 

assistance administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs are accommodated by the institution of higher learning for an absence caused 

by performing certain training. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 19, 2014 

Mrs. KIRKPATRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to ensure that members of a reserve component who are pursuing a course 

of education using educational assistance administered 

by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs are accommodated 

by the institution of higher learning for an absence 

caused by performing certain training. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Guard and Reserve 

5 Academic Protection Act’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5676 IH

1 SEC. 2. ACCOMMODATION OF MEMBERS OF RESERVE COM2 PONENTS PURSUING COURSE OF EDUCATION 

3 DURING PERFORMANCE OF CERTAIN TRAIN4 ING. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 36 of title 38, United 

6 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing new section: 

8 ‘‘§ 3699. Accommodation of members of reserve com9 ponents during performance of certain 

10 training 

11 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall ensure that 

12 an institution of higher learning provides an individual de13 scribed in subsection (b) with a reasonable opportunity to 

14 complete assignments, tests, and other requirements of a 

15 course of education that occur during any period in which 

16 the individual is absent from the course of education by 

17 reason of performing— 

18 ‘‘(1) inactive duty training; or 

19 ‘‘(2) active duty training for a period of less 

20 than 30 days. 

21 ‘‘(b) INDIVIDUAL DESCRIBED.—An individual de22 scribed in this subsection is an individual who is— 

23 ‘‘(1) a member of a reserve component; and 

24 ‘‘(2) pursuing a course of education with edu25 cational assistance under chapter 30 or 33 of this 

26 title or chapter 1606 or 1607 of title 10.’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5676 IH

1 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

2 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding 

3 at the end the following new item: 

‘‘3699. Accommodation of members of reserve components during performance 

of certain training.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

         CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report of Transition Auto Finance II (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Kenneth C. Lowe, the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: November 6, 2004                           /s/ Kenneth C. Lowe
                                                 --------------------
                                                   Kenneth C. Lowe
                                     Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, Michelle Gill, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form
    10-K of GSR Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-1F (the "Exchange Act periodic
    reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole,
    do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
    material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
    circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
    respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered
    by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in
    this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the
    Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their
    obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
    asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment
    of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required
    to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB
    and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to
    this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
    instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
    this report on Form 10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
    provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Chase Home Finance LLC
    as Sub-Servicer for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as
    Named Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Servicer and Wells Fargo Bank,
    N.A. as Master Servicer and Securities Administrator.

    Dated:   March 31, 2008


    /s/ Michelle Gill

    Michelle Gill
    Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 242 (Monday, December 18, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 65052]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30615]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 95-141; RM-8642]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Frederiksted, VI and Culebra and 
Carolina, PR

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; dismissal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission dismisses the petition for rule making filed by 
Jose J. Arzuaga, proposing the allotment of Channel 298B1 at 
Frederiksted, Virgin Islands, as its third local FM transmission 
service (RM-8642). See 60 FR 46563, September 7, 1995. We also dismiss 
petitioner's counterproposal to allotment Channel 293B in lieu of 
Channel 298B1 at Frederiksted, Virgin Islands, and to allot Channel 
298B1 at Culebra, Puerto Rico. The petitioner has abandoned his 
interest in a Class B1 allotment at Frederiksted, Virgin Islands, and 
there are no other timely expressions of interest for the channel. In 
addition, petitioner's counterproposal is not consistent with the 
Commission's technical requirements. With this action, this proceeding 
is terminated.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon P. McDonald, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 95-141, adopted November 30, 1995, and 
released December 11, 1995. The full text of this Commission decision 
is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., Washington, 
DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractors, International Transcription Service, 
Inc., (202) 857-3800, 2100 M Street, NW., Suite 140, Washington, DC 
20037.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 95-30615 Filed 12-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           5,410
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   93,738
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     35,040
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               138,592
<PP&E>                                         209,587
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,049
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 660,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          128,867
<BONDS>                                        319,030
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    194,409
<COMMON>                                         7,568
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   660,900
<SALES>                                        841,415
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               841,415
<CGS>                                          633,462
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  633,462
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,117)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,040
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,293
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,293
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,293
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MINGLONG LI,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 14-70236

Agency No. A076-210-555

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 14, 2015** 

Before: SILVERMAN, BYBEE and WATFORD, Circuit Judges. 

Minglong Li, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board

of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reconsider and

reopen. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of

discretion the denials of motions to reconsider and reopen. Mohammed v.

FILED

OCT 22 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny in part and dismiss in part

the petition.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Li’s motion as untimely,

where he filed the motion more than a year after his final order of removal. See 8

C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(2),(C)(2) (a motion to reconsider must be filed within 30 days

of a final order of removal and a motion to reopen must be filed within 90 days of a

final order of removal). Li does not challenge the BIA’s determination that he

failed to satisfy any exception to the motions deadline. See Lopez-Vasquez v.

Holder, 706 F.3d 1072, 1079-80 (9th Cir. 2013) (a petitioner waives a contention

by failing to raise it).

We lack jurisdiction to consider Li’s unexhausted contention that the

immigration judge failed to advise him about voluntary departure. See Tijani v.

Holder, 628 F.3d 1071, 1080 (9th Cir. 2010) (the court lacks jurisdiction to

consider legal claims not presented in an alien’s administrative proceedings before

the agency).

In light of this disposition, we do not reach Li’s remaining contentions.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

2 14-70236
#### M. N. TOXEY et al. *v.*W. B. MEGGS et al.

(Filed 27 September, 1939.)

Appeal and Error § 38—

When the Supreme Court is evenly divided in opinion, one Justice not sitting, the judgment oí the lower court will be affirmed without becoming a precedent.

Appeal by defendants from *Carr, J.,*at March Term, 1939, of CAMDEN.

Civil action to restrain defendants from cutting timber on plaintiffs’ land, and to recover damages for trespass already committed.

From verdict and judgment for plaintiffs, the defendants appeal, assigning errors.

*M. B. Simpson and McMullan & McMullan for plaintiffs, appellees.*

*Chester B. Morris and B. Clarence Dozier for defendants, appellants.*

Per Curiam.

One member of the Court, *Winborne, J.,*not sitting, and the remaining six being evenly divided in opinion whether reversible error has been shown, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed, accordant with the usual practice in such cases, and stands as the decision in the instant case, without becoming a precedent. *Allen v. Ins. Co.,*211 N. C., 736, 190 S. E., 735, and cases there cited.

Affirmed.
Exhibit
4.1


 


Share
Certificate


 


	Number
    of certificate 	 	 	 	Number
    of shares 
	 	 	 	 	 


 


FITELL
CORPORATION


COMPANY
NUMBER: [NUMBER]


 


THIS
SHARE CERTIFICATE CERTIFIES THAT as of [Transfer date], [Name] of [Address] is the registered holder of [Number] fully paid ordinary
share(s) of US$[value] par value per share in the above named Company which are held subject to, and transferable in accordance with,
the memorandum and articles of association of the Company (as revised).


 


In
Witness Whereof the Company has authorized this certificate to be issued on [Transfer date].


 


	 	By:	 
	 	 	[Name]
	 	 	Director
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# PHOTOS ANDVIDEOS

Search

Search

                                - All Images 
                                - Other 
                                - Space Shuttle 

                                - Upload Date
                                - Photo Date
                                - Title

----

Download Image: Full Size (1.88 MB)

Tags:Space Symposium, USSPACECOM

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 1 A1 32 7 . MALOY BROOKS v . THE STATE.

In 2 0 1 5

, M al o y Bro o ks was co n v i ct ed o f t wo co u nt s o f en t eri n g an au t o m o b i l e

an d on e co u n t o f t heft b y tak i n g , an d h e was s en t en ced to fi v e y ears to s erv e o n each

co u nt

, t o ru n co n secu t i v el y

. Bro o k s l at er fi l ed a m o t i on t o v o i d a n d v a cat e a n u l l

s en t en ce. On Decem

ber 9

, 2 0 2 0

, t he t ri al co urt en t ered an o rd er d en y in g t h e m o t i o n,

an d o n Feb ru ary 3, 2 0 2 1

, Bro o k s fi l ed a n o t i ce o f ap p eal t o t h i s Co u rt

. W e l ack
ju ri s d i ct i o n

. Pret erm it t i n g wh et h er Bro o k s h ad a ri g h t o f d i rect ap p eal h ere, h i s n o t i ce o f

ap p eal w as n o t t i m el y fi l ed

. A n o t i ce o f ap p eal m u s t b e fi l ed wi t h i n 30 day s o f t h e

en t ry o f an ap p eal ab l e ju d g m en t

. OCGA § 5 -6 -3 8 (a). Th e pro p er an d ti m el y fi l i n g

o f a n o t i ce o f ap p eal is an ab s o l u t e req u i rem en t t o co n fer j u ri sd i ct i o n o n t h i s Co u rt

. Ro wl a n d v. St a t e , 2 6 4 Ga. 8 72

, 8 7 2 (1 ) (4 5 2 S E2 d 7 5 6 ) (1 99 5 ). Here, Bro o k s fi l ed

h i s n ot i ce o f ap peal 5 6 d ay s aft er en t ry o f t h e tri al co u rt ’ s o rd er. Th u s , t h i s ap p eal i s

h ereb y DISM ISSED fo r l ack o f ju ri s d i ct i o n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. April 27, 2021

04/27/2021
#### Daniel Brice, Respondent, v. Paul Bauer, Appellant.

— Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs. Opinion, by

Pratt, J.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5762 

To authorize Department of Veterans Affairs health care providers to provide 

recommendations and opinions to veterans regarding participation in 

State marijuana programs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 20, 2014 

Mr. BLUMENAUER (for himself, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Ms. TITUS, Mr. AMASH, 

Mr. BROUN of Georgia, Mr. JONES, Mr. MASSIE, Mr. FARR, Mr. POLIS, 

Mr. O’ROURKE, Mr. STOCKMAN, and Mr. COHEN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To authorize Department of Veterans Affairs health care 

providers to provide recommendations and opinions to 

veterans regarding participation in State marijuana programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Equal Access 

5 Act of 2014’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 5762 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROVISION BY DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AF2 FAIRS HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS OF REC3 OMMENDATIONS AND OPINIONS REGARDING 

4 VETERAN PARTICIPATION IN STATE MARI5 JUANA PROGRAMS. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Sec7 retary of Veterans Affairs shall authorize physicians and 

8 other health care providers employed by the Department 

9 of Veterans Affairs to— 

10 (1) provide recommendations and opinions to 

11 veterans who are residents of States with State 

12 marijuana programs regarding the participation of 

13 veterans in such State marijuana programs; and 

14 (2) complete forms reflecting such recommenda15 tions and opinions. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS