T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T MANU E L DE J E S US MANC I AGA R C I A, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 12- 71726 A ge nc yN o. A 200- 967- 367 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d Jul y24, 2013 ** B efo re: A L A R C Ó N , C L IF T O N , an dC A L L A H A N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. M a nue l de J e s us M a nc i a - G a r c i a , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of G ua t e m a l a , pe t i t i ons pr o s e f orr e vi e w of

the B oa r d of

I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ ( “ B I A ” ) or de rdi s m i s s i ng hi s appe a l f

r om a n i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s ( “ I J ” ) de c i s i on de ny i ng hi s appl i c a t i ons f or asyl u m , w i th h o l d i n g o f rem o v al , an dp ro t ect i o n u n d er th e C o n v en t i o n A g ai n st 

# FI LED JU L 31 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 71726 2 T ortur e ( “ C A T ” ) . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f or s ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e th e a g e n c y ’s f a c tu a l f in d in g s , Zho u v. G on zales , 437 F . 3d 860, 8 6 4 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 6 ) , a n dwe d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. A s a p rel i m i n ary m att er, M an ci a-G arci a’ s co n t en t i o n s th atth e IJ’ s ad v erse c r e d ib ilityf

in d in g w a s u n s up p o rte da n dth a t it v io la te dh is du e p r o c e s s r ig h ts f a il b e c au s e th e I Jf

o u n dh im c r e d ib le . S ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e s up p o rts th e B I A ’s c o n c lu s io n th a t M a n c ia - G a r c ia f a ile dto e s tab lis h p a s t p e r s e c u tio n w h e r e h is ab u s e r s w e r e p r iv a te a c to r s , h e d id notr e portthe abus e , a nd the r e c or d e vi de nc e be f or e the I Jdoe s notc om pe l the c o n c lu s io n th a t th e p o lic e w e r e u n w illin g o ru n ab le to p r o te c t h o m o s e x u a ls . See Castro-M

art i nez v . H

older , 67 4 F . 3d 10 73 , 10 80 -82 (9th C i r. 20 11 ). S ub st ant i al ev i d en ce al so sup p o rt s th e B IA ’ s co n cl u si o n th atM an ci a-G arci a fai l edt o est ab l i sh a w el l -f ou nd ed fe arof pers ec ut i on base d o n h i s s exual ori ent at i on w here the re cord e vi de nc e be f

or e the I Jdi d nots how tha tthe gove rnm e ntw oul d be unabl e or u n w illin g to p r o te c t h im , s e e i d. , orapa tt e rn orpr a c t i c e of pe r s e c ut i on of h o m o s e x u a ls in G u a te m a la , se e W akkaryv. H

older , 5 5 8 F .3 d1 0 4 9 , 1 0 6 1 - 6 2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) . A c c o r d in g ly , M a n c ia - G a r c ia ’s a s y lu m c la im f a ils .12- 71726 3 B e c aus e M a nc i a - G a r c i af a i l e d t o e s t abl i s h e l i gi bi l i tyf ora s y l um , he n e c e s s a r ilyf

a ils to m e e t th e m o r e s tr in g e n t s tan d a r df o rw ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l. See Zehat

ye v. G on zales , 4 5 3 F .3 d1 1 8 2 , 1 1 9 0 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 6 ) . S ub st an t i al ev i d en ce sup p o rt s th e B IA ’ s d en i al o f C A T p ro t ect i o n b ecau se M anci a- G ar ci a f

ai l ed t o d em on strat e i ti s m ore l i kel y than n othe w i l l be t ortured b yo rw ith th e c o n s e n t o ra c q u ie s c e n c e o f th e G u a te m a lan g o v e rn m e n t. See Si laya v. Mukasey , 52 4 F . 3d 10 66 , 10 73 (9th C i r. 20 08 ). W e do notc ons i de rthe de c l a r a t i on s ubm i tt e d byM a nc i a - G a r c i atha ti s not c o n ta in e din th e a d m in is tr a tiv e r e c o r d . Se e Fis h e rv . I NS , 7 9 F .3 d9 5 5 , 9 6 3 ( 9 th C i r. 19 96 ) ( en banc). F urther, w e do n otconsi der M anci a- G ar ci a’ s c ou ntry cond i t i on s e vi dence apartfr om the 20 10 coun tryre po rt– thi s a dd i t i on alevi dence w as no tbefore the IJ , M anci a- G ar ci a di d n otci t e t o o r otherw i se m ake the B IA a w a r e o f th e e v id e n c e o n ap p e a l, an dth e r e is n o in d ic a tio n th e B I A r e v ie w e dit. T h e s tayo f

r e m o v a l g r a n te do n N o v e m b e r7 , 2 0 1 2 c o n tin u e s in e f f e c t u n til the m andat e i ss ues. T hu s, w e deny M anci a- G ar ci a’ s r enew ed m ot i on t o st ay rem o v al as u n n ecessary. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.