alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.1


 


AMENDMENT
TO STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT


 


This
Amendment (“Amendment”) to the Stock Purchase Agreement dated March 2, 2020 (“Agreement”), is made and entered
into by and between Intellinetics, Inc., Graphic Sciences, Inc., Thomas M. Liebold, Gregory P. Colton, Fredrick M. Kamienny, and Frederick
L. Erlich. Defined terms that are used but not defined herein shall be as defined in the Agreement. This Amendment shall be effective
as of the date of the last signature below (the “Amendment Date”).


 


I.
Amendment.




 


	 	1)	The
    Parties hereby agree that the Earn-Out payment for the Year 3 Earnout Period set forth in Section 2.06(a)(iii) shall equal $700,000
    and be paid on January 2, 2023, as follows:


 


	 	a.	Payment
    to Thomas M. Liebold of $175,000.
	 	b.	Payment
    to Gregory P. Colton of $175,000.
	 	c.	Payment
    to Fredrick M. Kamienny of $175,000.
	 	d.	Payment
    to Frederick L. Erlich of $175,000.


 


	 	2)	As
    of the Amendment Date and subject only to full receipt of payment as set forth above, each of the payees hereby agree and acknowledge
    that all Earn-Out obligations of Intellinetics, Inc. and/or Graphic Sciences, Inc. will be deemed satisfied in full by the foregoing
    payments. As of the Amendment Date and subject only to full receipt of payment as set forth above, all Parties to the Agreement waive
    and release any claims relating to the Earn-Out pursuant to Section 2.06 of the Agreement.


 


II. Order
of Precedence. This Amendment is supplementary to and modifies the Agreement. The terms of this Amendment supersede provisions
in the Agreement to the extent that the terms of this Amendment and the Agreement conflict. However, nothing in this Amendment should
be interpreted as invalidating the Agreement, and provisions of the Agreement will continue to govern relations between the parties insofar
as they do not conflict with this Amendment.


 


III. Counterparts.
This Amendment may be executed electronically and/or in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which
together shall constitute one and the same document. Additionally, a fully executed PDF of this Amendment shall be deemed to constitute
an original document.


 


[Signatures
appear on next page.]


 



    	 



     


    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.


 


	Intellinetics,
    Inc.	 	Graphic
    Sciences, Inc.
	 	 	 	 	 
	By:
    	/s/
    James DeSocio	 	By:	/s/
    Joe Spain
	Name:
    	James
    DeSocio	 	Name:
    	Joe
    Spain
	Date:
    	11/21/2022	 	Date:	11/21/2022
	 	 	 	 	 
	Thomas
    M. Liebold	 	Gregory
    P. Colton
	 	 	 
	/s/
    Thomas M. Liebold	 	/s/
    Gregory P. Colton
	Date:
    	11/18/2022	 	Date:	11/18/2022
	 	 	 	 	 
	Fredrick
    M. Kamienny	 	Frederick
    L. Erlich
	 	 	 
	/s/
    LAURA KAMIENNY	 	/s/
    Frederick L. Erlich
	By
    	LAURA
    KAMIENNY 	under
    POA	 	Date:
    	11/18/2022
	Date:
    	11/20/2022
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3322 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3322

 To require the imposition of sanctions with respect to Nord Stream 2 
                                  AG.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 7, 2021

   Mr. Cruz introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the imposition of sanctions with respect to Nord Stream 2 
                                  AG.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``CAATSA Implementation Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS WITH RESPECT TO NORD STREAM 2 AG.

    (a) Finding.--Congress finds that since July 21, 2021, the 
Government of the Russian Federation has attempted to use energy as a 
weapon to achieve aggressive political ends.
    (b) Application of Sanctions.--Not later than 15 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall impose the 
sanctions described in subsection (b) of section 10 of the Sovereignty, 
Integrity, Democracy, and Economic Stability of Ukraine Act of 2014 (22 
U.S.C. 8909), as added by section 228 of the Countering America's 
Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (Public Law 115-44; 131 Stat. 911), 
with respect to Nord Stream 2 AG.
    (c) Congressional Review of Termination of Sanctions.--Section 
216(a)(2) of the Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act 
(22 U.S.C. 9511(a)(2)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A)(ii), by inserting ``or otherwise 
        remove'' after ``waive''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (B)(i)--
                    (A) in subclause (II), by striking ``; or'' and 
                inserting a semicolon;
                    (B) in subclause (III), by striking ``; and'' and 
                inserting ``; or''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
                                    ``(IV) section 2(b) of the CAATSA 
                                Implementation Act of 2021; and''.
                                 <all>
```
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	GEN JAMES H. DICKINSON
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4619" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/DOD2/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint bio">
    <div class="header">
        

        

        
        
        <span class="left"><img height="100" alt="Left Seal" src="https://media.defense.gov/2021/Apr/07/2002615666/-1/-1/0/210330-F-CN249-0002.PNG" /></span>
        

        

        
        
        

        <h1 class="title">GEN JAMES H. DICKINSON</h1>
        <h3 class="subtitle">Commander</h3>
        <h3 class="subtitle"></h3>
        <h3 class="subtitle"></h3>
    </div>
    <div>
        
        <div class="main-image">
            
<div class="bio-gallery gallery">
    
    <div class="img-wrapper">
        <img class="img-responsive" src="https://media.defense.gov/2023/Aug/02/2003273075/400/400/0/230712-F-TD082-1001.JPG" alt="U.S. Army General James H. Dickinson is the Commander, U.S. Space Command"/>
        
    </div>
    
</div>



        </div>
        
    </div>
    <div>
        <p><span style="color:#000000;">U.S. Army General James H. Dickinson is the Commander, U.S. Space Command, the 11th and newest unified combatant command. He assumed command on Aug. 20, 2020, after serving as the first Deputy Commander of U.S. Space Command.<br />
<br />
General Dickinson is a native of Estes Park, Colorado and a 1985 graduate of Colorado State University where he earned a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering. He holds a Master of Science in Operations Research and Systems Analysis from the Colorado School of Mines and later earned a Master’s degree in Strategic Studies from the United States Army War College.<br />
<br />
As the Commander of U.S. Space Command, General Dickinson is responsible for defending U.S. and Allied interests in the space domain while providing space-enabled combat effects to joint warfighters around the world. He exercises combatant command authority over 18,000 Soldiers, Marines, Sailors, Airmen, and Guardians operating ground and space-based systems around the world that provide satellite communication, space domain awareness, offensive and defensive space control effects, and position, navigation, and timing services.<br />
<br />
General Dickinson has commanded at every level in the United States Army from Platoon to Combatant Command and is the Senior Air and Missile Defense Officer in the Department of Defense.<br />
<br />
January 2022</span></p>

    </div>
</div>
    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
#### Robert E. Philips, Appellant, v. Perry Calkins and Thankful Calkins, Respondents.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied

*Per Curiam*

opinion filed with the clerk of Oneida.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6745
EARL ELWOOD ALLEN, Petitioner - Appellant,
v. GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:07-cv-00196-RBS-TEM) Submitted: September 16, 2008 Decided: September 22, 2008 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Earl Elwood Allen, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Earl Elwood Allen seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Allen that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Allen failed to object to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Allen has waived appellate review by failing to timely file specific objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7567]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3095]



[[Page 7567]]

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


North Fork Bancorporation, Inc.; Acquisition of Company Engaged 
in Permissible Nonbanking Activities

    The organization listed in this notice has applied under Sec.  
225.23(a)(2) or (f) of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.23(a)(2) or 
(f)) for the Board's approval under section 4(c)(8) of the Bank Holding 
Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843(c)(8)) and Sec.  225.21(a) of Regulation Y 
(12 CFR 225.21(a)) to acquire or control voting securities or assets of 
a company engaged in a nonbanking activity that is listed in Sec.  
225.25 of Regulation Y as closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, such activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    The application is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing on the question whether consummation of the proposal can 
``reasonably be expected to produce benefits to the public, such as 
greater convenience, increased competition, or gains in efficiency, 
that outweigh possible adverse effects, such as undue concentration of 
resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interests, or 
unsound banking practices.'' Any request for a hearing on this question 
must be accompanied by a statement of the reasons a written 
presentation would not suffice in lieu of a hearing, identifying 
specifically any questions of fact that are in dispute, summarizing the 
evidence that would be presented at a hearing, and indicating how the 
party commenting would be aggrieved by approval of the proposal.
    Comments regarding the application must be received at the Reserve 
Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than 
February 22, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (William L. Rutledge, Senior 
Vice President) 33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045:
    1. North Fork Bancorporation, Inc., Mattituck, New York; to acquire 
up to 9.9 percent of the outstanding common stock of Sunrise Bancorp, 
Inc., Farmingdale, New York, and thereby indirectly acquire an interest 
in Sunrise's wholly-owned federal savings bank subsidiary, Sunrise 
Federal Savings Bank, Farmingdale, New York, and its subsidiary, 
Paumanok Service Corp., Farmingdale, New York, and thereby engage in 
securities brokerage activities, pursuant to Secs.  225.25(b)(9) and 
(15) of the Board's Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 2, 
1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-3095 Filed 2-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Me morandum Opinion filed January

17 , 2019
.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 18 -00939- CV

SHIN JAE- HO , Appellant

V. AMERICAN BUREAU OF SHIPPING, Appellee
On Appeal from the 333rd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2018-73842

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N This is an appeal from a judgment signed October 15, 2018. On December 18, 2018, appellant filed a motion to withdraw his notice of appeal and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Wise, Zimmerer, and Spain.
#### H. J. LEE v. BESSIE DRIGGERS, Administratrix of ROSA PARHAM, Deceased.

(Filed 19 April, 1944.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *Harris, J.,*at November Term, 1943, of Wake.

Civil action for recovery on a negotiable note, to which defendant pleads the three-year statute of limitations. G. S., 1-52, formerly C. S., 441.

*858The case was tried upon a single issue of indebtedness — to which, the jury answered “No.” From judgment thereon plaintiff appeals to Supreme Court and assigns error.

*J. M. Templeton for plaintiff, appellant.*

*Briggs & West for defendant, appellee.*

Pee Curiam.

Upon the pleadings in the case the liability of the estate of Rosa Parham, deceased, was made to depend upon whether she signed the note by way of accommodation to her son, J. M. Parham. It was largely a question of fact which the jury has settled. And the case on appeal fails to show prejudicial error.

No error.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# INSPECTORGENERAL

Enter Title

# FAQ Links By Service BranchFor Assistance

IG Menu

                          - Main Page
                          - Matters appropriate for the USSPACECOM IG
                          - Matters not normally appropriate for the USSPACECOM IG
                          - Frequently asked questions
                          - Links by service branch for assistance
                          - Whistleblower reprisal
                          - Classified information
                          - Confidentiality and privacy
                          - Read before filing
                          - Army Inspector General locator
                          - Marine Corps Inspector General locator
                          - Navy Inspector General locator
                          - Air Force Inspector General locator
                          - U.S. Space Force Inspector General

#### **QUICK LINKS**

#### Accessibility  |  Section 508    Web PolicySite Map  |  Defense.gov  |  Intel.govQuestions  |  Privacy and SecurityContact Us  |  Inspector General  |  FOIAOPM.gov  |  Plain Writing Act | MISONo Fear Act  |  Links DisclaimerUSA.gov  |  DoD Open Government

                  - Facebook
                  - X
                  - YouTube
                  - LinkedIn
                  - Civilian Careers

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
**Exhibit 34.4.2**

[Letterhead of KPMG LLP] 

KPMG LLP 

1601 Market Street 

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2499 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board of Members 

Regulus Group LLC: 

We haveexamined management’s assessment for those customers that management has informed us have requested confirmation of compliance, including in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that RegulusGroup LLC complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for remittance processing services to those issuers of asset backed securities andservicers of loan and/or receivables portfolios that include pool assets for asset backed securities transactions (the Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007. Regulus Group LLC has determined that the remainder of theservicing criteria are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment about the Company’s compliance based on our examination. 

Our examination wasconducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria specifiedabove and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities relatedto the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transaction andservicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances oramounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does notprovide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. 

In our opinion, management’s assessment that the Companycomplied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007 is fairly stated, in all material respects. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

February 12, 2008 

KPMG, LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership is the U.S. 

member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 22 (Wednesday, February 3, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5763-5764]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-01883]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2012-N-0194]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office 
of Management and Budget Approval; Biosimilar User Fee Cover Sheet; 
Form FDA 3792

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled ``Biosimilar User Fee Cover Sheet; 
Form FDA 3792'' has been approved by the Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FDA PRA Staff, Office of Operations, 
Food and Drug Administration, 8455 Colesville Rd., COLE-14526, Silver 
Spring, MD 20993-0002, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#47171506143326212107212326692f2f3469202831"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="89d9dbc8dafde8efefc9efede8a7e1e1faa7eee6ff">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 23, 2015, the Agency submitted a 
proposed collection of information entitled ``Biosimilar User Fee Cover 
Sheet; Form FDA 3792'' to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 
3507. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays 
a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the 
information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0718. 
The approval expires on December 31, 2018. A copy of the supporting 
statement for this

[[Page 5764]]

information collection is available on the Internet at http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.

    Dated: January 28, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-01883 Filed 2-2-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>