alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Fred. Buettner v. The Village of Percy.

*Practice—Appeal—Costs—Pule.*

A county court, upon setting aside an order of dismissal, may require the costs for the terra to be paid ten days before the first day of the next term.

[Opinion filed June 15, 1889.]

Appeal from the County Court of Bando! ph County; the Hon. Warreen N. Wilson, Judge, presiding.

Mr. John Michan, for appellant.

Mr. A. G. Gordon, for appellee.

*390Phillips, J.

The appellant was convicted of the violation of an ordinance of the village of Percy on a trial before a justice of the peace, and appealed the case to the County Court. At the May term, 1888, of that court, for non-compliance with a rule theretofore entered against appellant, the suit was dismissed. On the motion of appellant the order of dismissal was set aside and appel'ant was ordered to pay the costs for the term, ten days before the first day of the next term, and cause continued. At the December term, 1888, of the County Court, the appeal was dismissed for non-compliance with rule “in this, that the said defendant did not pay the costs taxed against him in this cause ten days prior to the first day of this term,” and a *procedendo*was ordered to issue. From that order of dismissal this appeal is prosecuted. A judgment for costs as made by the order of the May term, payable ten days before the first day of the next term, is more than a judgment to be collected by execution or fee bills, where the time and manner of collection is determined by the writ in the hands of the officer, and the property of defendant liable to execution. That judgment *amounted*to a rule requiring the costs to be paid ten days before the first day of the next term and was conditioned. The court had the power to make such a rule, and for non-compliance therewith could dismiss the appeal. The judgment is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,831
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   81,757
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                84,588
<PP&E>                                           6,907
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,511
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 210,545
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          343,148
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           532
<OTHER-SE>                                   (133,135)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   210,545
<SALES>                                         31,480
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,480
<CGS>                                           68,539
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  201,868
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (170,388)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (170,388)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (170,388)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)









</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Solar Energy Limited (Registrant) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Andrew Wallace, chief executive officer and chief financial officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)     This Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of Registrant

| | at the end of the period covered by this Report and results of operations of Registrant for the period covered by this Report.
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 28, 2006

/s/ Andrew Wallace

Andrew Wallace, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Peter Wyckoff. Appellant, v. H. M. Sadler and others, Respondents.

— Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Pratt, J.
EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO

In re:

Marcos A. Rivera Ortiz 2024 TSPR 31

213 DPR ___

Número del Caso: TS

- 5,398

Fecha: 3 de abril de 2024

Abogada de la peticionaria:

Lcda. Daisy Calcaño López

Materia: Reinstalación al ejercicio de la abogacía.

Este documento está sujeto a los cambios y correcciones del

proceso de compilación y publicación oficial de las decisiones

del Tribunal Supremo. Su distribución electrónica se hace como un

servicio pú blico a la comunidad.E N EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO

In re:

Marco s A. Riv era Ortiz TS

- 5,398

RESOLUCIÓN

En San Jua n, Puerto Rico, a 3 de abril de 2024

.

Examinada la M oción Sometiendo Documento y

R eiterando la Sol icitud de Reinstalación en el Ejercicio

de l a Abogacía presentada por el Sr. Marco s A. Riv era

Ortiz , se p rovee Ha L ugar a la misma

.

S e instruye a la Se cretar í a de este Tribunal a que

tome nota en el expediente en cuanto a que la Lcda. Da i s y

Calcaño L ó pez es la única representa nte legal del

comparec iente

.

S e orden a la activación de las Quejas AB

- 2023

- 0187 y

A B

- 2023

- 0200 para que continúen el trámite

corre spondiente.

L o acordó el T ribunal y lo certifica el Sec retari o

de l T rib unal Supr em o

. E l J uez Asocia do s eñor Mart í nez

Torres emite la expresión sig uiente

, a la cua l se une el

Juez Asociado señor Feliberti Cintrón :

D enegaría la solicitud de reinstalación en esta

etapa y hasta que se adjudique n las quejas AB

2023

- 0200

, AB

- 2023

- 0187 y AB

- 2024

- 0015 que pesan

en contra del Sr. Marcos A

. Rivera Ortiz

. En

protección del interés público, deberíamos dar a

las solicitudes de reinstalación el mismo trato

que a las peticiones de admisión . P or

consiguiente, antes de reactivar la licencia de

un solicitante se d ebe dilucidar cualquier

señalamiento disciplinario pen diente en su

contra.

L a Juez a P residenta Oronoz Rodríguez s e inhibió

.

Jav ier O. Sepúlveda Rodr í guez

S ecretari o del Tribunal Sup remo
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 242 (Monday, December 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 65056]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30658]



========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 242 / Monday, December 18, 1995 / 
Notices

[[Page 65056]]


DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Natural Resources Conservation Service


Boulder River Watershed, Montana

AGENCY: Natural Resources conservation Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent to deauthorize Federal funding.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act, 
Public Law 83-566, and the Natural Resources Conservation Service 
Guidelines (7 CFR 622), the Natural Resources Conservation Service 
gives notice of the intent to deauthorize Federal funding for the 
Boulder River Watershed project in Jefferson County, Montana.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard J. Gooby, State Conservationist, Natural Resource Conservation 
Service, 10 East Babcock Street Room 442, Bozeman, Montana 59715, 
telephone: 406-587-6813.

Boulder River Watershed, Montana

Notice of Intent to Deauthorize Federal Funding

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A determination has been made by Richard J. 
Gooby that the proposed works of improvement for the Boulder River 
Watershed project will not be installed. The sponsoring local 
organizations have concurred in this determination and agree that 
Federal funding should be deauthorized for the project. Information 
regarding this determination may be obtained from Richard J. Gooby, 
State Conservationist, at the above address and telephone number.

    No administrative action on implementation of the proposed 
deauthorization will be taken until 60 days after the date of this 
publication in the Federal Register.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 10.904, 
Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention. Office of management and 
Budget Circular A-95 regarding State and local clearinghouse review 
of Federal and federally assisted programs and projects is 
applicable.)

    Dated: December 6, 1995.
Christine Peterson,
Acting State Conservationist.
[FR Doc. 95-30658 Filed 12-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-M
#### L. E. O'BRIANT, MAYE H. O'BRIANT, EARL J. O'BRIANT, JESSIE O'BRIANT, R. D. O'BRIANT and NEFFIE O'BRIANT BRADSHER v. MRS. E. FRANK LEE, CLAUD V. JONES, Trustee; MRS. E. FRANK LEE, Guardian, and VICTOR S. BRYANT, Trustee for ELSIE LOIS LEE.

(Filed 2 February, 1940.)

Appeal by plaintiffs from *Parker, J.,*at May-June Civil Term, 1939, of Durham.

No error.

To tbe signing of tbe judgment plaintiffs excepted, assigned error and made numerous other exceptions and assignments of error and appealed to tbe Supreme Court.

*Bennett & McDonald and Guthrie & Guthrie for plaintiffs.*

*Brooks, McLendon & Holderness and Hedrick & Hall for defendants.*

Per Curiam.

This is tbe third time an appeal in this case has been before this Court. In tbe first appeal (212 N. C., 793), tbe Court granted a new trial for that tbe court below in its charge to tbe jury *808committed error in its charge as to the *quantum*of proof. In the second appeal (214 N. C., 723), tbe Court held there was error by the court below in its refusal to submit issues of fact to the jury — the issue being as to what was the intent of the parties, this being an action to have a deed absolute on its face and a contemporaneous contract by defendants’ grantees to reconvey declared in equity a mortgage.

The issues were submitted to the jury, who found against the plaintiffs. On the trial in the court below the plaintiffs made numerous exceptions and assignments of error as to permitting incompetent evidence on the trial, to the exclusion of competent evidence: “That the court erred in the submission of the issues as submitted by the court and the refusal to submit the issues tendered by plaintiffs; that the court erred in its refusal to give the special instructions asked by the plaintiffs.”

The above and other exceptions and assignments of error cannot be sustained. The controversy hinged mainly on a question of fact. There is no general charge of the court below in the record and the presumption is that the court below charged correctly the law applicable to the facts. The questions of fact are for the jury and their verdict should not be lightly considered or overruled unless there is prejudicial or reversible error. We see none on this record.

In the'judgment of the court below we find

No error.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 241 (Friday, December 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64420-64421]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30600]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 120895A]


Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council (Council) will 
convene a public meeting of its Shrimp Advisory Panel (AP).

DATES: The meeting will be held on January 9, 1996 beginning at 9:00 
a.m. and will conclude at 4:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the New Orleans Airport Hilton 
Hotel, 901 Airline Highway, Kenner, LA; telephone: 504-469-5000.
    Council address: Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council, 5401 
West Kennedy Boulevard, Suite 331, Tampa, FL 33609.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Antonio B. Lamberte, Economist; 
telephone: 813-228-2815.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The AP will review scientific information on 
the cooperative shrimp closure with the State of Texas, royal red 
shrimp regulatory amendment (tentative) and comparison of shrimp vessel 
effort and bycatch characterization effort. The AP consists principally 
of commercial shrimp fishermen, dealers and association 
representatives. The AP will develop recommendations to the Council 
regarding the extent of the closure of Federal waters off Texas in 1996 
concurrent with the closure of Texas waters. If Amendment 8 to the 
Shrimp Fishery Management Plan is approved, the AP will review a 
regulatory amendment that would provide a procedure for setting a total 
allowable catch of royal red shrimp. The AP will also develop 
recommendations regarding the level of effort in the shrimp fishery 
after reviewing information that compares levels of effort collected 
using the current method and effort collected from the bycatch 
characterization study.

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Anne Alford at the Council (see ADDRESSES) by 
January 2, 1996.

 
[[Page 64421]]

    Dated: December 8, 1995.
Richard W. Surdi,
Acting Director, Office of Fisheries Conservation and Management, 
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 95-30600 Filed 12-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
#### STATE v. JAMES H. VANDERLIP.

(Filed 21 November, 1945.)

Bastards § 3—

Willfulness of the neglect or refusal to provide adequate means of support of an illegitimate child, G. S., 49-2, is one of the essential elements of the offense, and must be charged in the warrant; and a motion in arrest of judgment should be allowed on failure of the warrant to so charge.

Appeal by defendant from *Dixon, Special Judge,*at Special March Term, 1945, of Mecklenbueg.

It was evidently intended to charge the defendant with the violation of Gr. S., 49-2 (ch. 228, Public Laws 1933, as amended), relating to the support of illegitimate children. The warrant upon which the defendant was tried charged that he “did willfully, maliciously, unlawfully and feloniously become the father of an illegitimate child by the name of James H. Forbes, who was born on the 11th day of August, 1943, and has failed and refused to provide adequate means of support for the said child.” The verdict upon the issues submitted was against the defendant and judgment of imprisonment predicated thereon was pronounced, and defendant moved in arrest of judgment, which motion was denied and exception noted. The defendant appealed, assigning errors.

*Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorneys-General Rhodes, Moody, and Tucker for the State.*

*Henry L. Strickland for defendant.*

*611Per Curiam.

Tbe statute under which the defendant was tried provides that “Any parent who willfully neglects or who refuses to support and maintain his or her illegitimate child shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to such penalties as are hereinafter provided.” Willfulness of the neglect or refusal to provide adequate means of support of the illegitimate child is one of the essential elements of the offense, and must be charged in the warrant. *S. v. Cook,*207 N. C., 261, 176 S. E., 757; *S. v. McLamb,*214 N. C., 322, 199 S. E., 81.

The motion in arrest of judgment should have been allowed, *S. v. McLamb, supra; S. v. Tarlton,*208 N. C., 734, 182 S. E., 81; *S. v. Clarke,*220 N. C., 392, 17 S. E. (2d), 468, and therefore the judgment below is

Reversed.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members         
    -  AEE Multimedia         
    -  AEE Research Library 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# PHOTOS ANDVIDEOS

Search

Search

                                - All Images 
                                - Other 
                                - Space Shuttle 

                                - Upload Date
                                - Photo Date
                                - Title

Clear Search4 results found.
```

[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 238 (Tuesday, December 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 63708]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30184]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket Nos. RP96-73-000 and TM96-2-9-000]

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Filing

December 6, 1995.
    Take notice that on December 1, 1995, Tennessee Gas Pipeline 
Company (Tennessee) filed a transportation cost rate adjustment (TCRA) 
to recover costs paid for transportation on other pipelines, as 
reflected in Account 858, pursuant to Article XXIV of Tennessee's FERC 
Gas Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1 and to reflect the Gas Research 
Institute (GRI) Adjustment for 1996. Tennessee requests that the 
following tariff sheets implementing the TCRA, be accepted and allowed 
to go into effect on January 1, 1996:

Fourth Revised Sheet No. 20
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 21
Eighth Revised Sheet No. 21A
Thirteenth Revised Sheet No. 22
Eighth Revised Sheet No. 22A
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 23
First Revised Sheet No. 23A
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 26
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 26A
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 26B

    Tennessee states that the filing will reduce its TRCA surcharge by 
$.14 per dth, resulting in a TCRA surcharge of $.30 per dth.
    Tennessee states that copies of the filing have been mailed to all 
affected customers and state regulatory commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with 
reference to said filing should file a petition to intervene or protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214. Pursuant to Sec. 154.210 of the Commission's regulations, all 
such motions or protests must be filed not later than 12 days after the 
date of the filing noted above. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to this proceeding. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a petition to intervene. Copies of 
this filing are on file and available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-30184 Filed 12-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```