alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-1709

ROBERT L. JOHNSON, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

NUBIAN PRINCESS ENT, 

 Defendant - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. 

(4:07-cv-01625-TLW) 

Submitted: January 15, 2009 Decided: January 21, 2009 

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Robert L. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Robert L. Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and 

dismissing his civil complaint. We dismiss the appeal for lack 

of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely 

filed. 

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of 

the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends 

the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period 

is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of 

Corr., 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. 

Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). 

The district court’s order was entered on the docket 

on July 31, 2007. The notice of appeal was filed at the 

earliest on June 13, 2008. Because Johnson failed to file a 

timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening 

of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6682

JOHN DANIEL SPRINGER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

DENNIS BUSH, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Bruce H. Hendricks, District 

Judge. (0:13-cv-03549-BHH)

Submitted: October 30, 2015 Decided: November 5, 2015

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Daniel Springer, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, 

Senior Assistant Attorney General, Melody Jane Brown, Assistant 

Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

John Daniel Springer seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition and the 

court’s order denying Springer’s motion for reconsideration. 

The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Springer has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 
3

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5705 Received in Senate (RDS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5705

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 10, 2014

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To modify certain provisions relating to the Propane Education and 
                           Research Council.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Propane Education and Research 
Enhancement Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE PROPANE EDUCATION AND RESEARCH 
              COUNCIL.

    (a) Functions of Propane Education and Research Council.--Section 
5(f) of the Propane Education and Research Act of 1996 (15 U.S.C. 
6404(f)) is amended in the first sentence by inserting ``to train 
propane distributors and consumers in strategies to mitigate negative 
effects of future propane price spikes,'' after ``to enhance consumer 
and employee safety and training,''.
    (b) Market Survey and Consumer Protection Price Analysis.--Section 
9(a) of the Propane Education and Research Act of 1996 (15 U.S.C. 
6408(a)) is amended in the first sentence by striking ``only data 
provided by the Energy Information Administration'' and inserting ``the 
refiner price to end users of consumer grade propane, as published by 
the Energy Information Administration''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 9, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
**Exhibit 21**

American Pharmaceutical Agents, Inc. (Virginia)

Dendrite Asia Pacific Pte Ltd, (Korea)

Dendrite Asia Pacific Pty. Ltd. (Singapore)

Dendrite Australia Pty. Ltd. (Australia)

Dendrite Austria GmbH (Austria)

Dendrite Belgium S.A. (Belgium)

Dendrite Brasil Ltda. (Brazil)

Dendrite Canada Ltd. (Canada)

Dendrite Colombia LTDA (Colombia)

Dendrite Deutschland GmbH (Germany)

Dendrite Europe Limited (United Kingdom)

Dendrite France S.A. (France)

Dendrite Hellas S.A. (Greece)

Dendrite Information Consulting (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.

Dendrite Interactive Marketing, LLC (Delaware)

Dendrite International Services Company (Delaware)

Dendrite International, Inc. (New Jersey)

Dendrite Italia Srl (Italy)

Dendrite Japan LLC (Japan)

Dendrite Korea Inc. (Delaware)

Dendrite México, S. de R. L. de C. V. (Mexico)

Dendrite Netherlands BV (Netherlands)

Dendrite Netherlands Finance B.V. (Netherlands)

Dendrite New Zealand Ltd. (New Zealand)

Dendrite Portugal (Portugal)

Dendrite Software India Private Limited (India)

Dendrite Sp. z o.o. (Poland)

Dendrite Spain S.A. (Spain)

Dendrite Turkey Inc. (Delaware)

MDM Acquisition LLC (Delaware)

MDM o.o.o. (Russia)

New ST, Inc. (Delaware)

Schwarzeck Verlag GmbH (Germany)

Synavant do Brasil Ltda.(Brazil)

Synavant LLC (Delaware)

Synavant Portugal (Portugal)

Synavant Turkey (Turkey)

Uto Brain LLC (Japan)

----
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5731 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5731

To extend foreclosure and eviction protections for servicemembers, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 18, 2014

 Mr. Grayson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend foreclosure and eviction protections for servicemembers, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Servicemembers Foreclosure 
Protection Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PROTECTIONS FOR MEMBERS OF UNIFORMED SERVICES 
              RELATING TO MORTGAGES, MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE, AND 
              EVICTION.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 710(d) of the Honoring 
America's Veterans and Caring for Camp Lejeune Families Act of 2012 
(Public Law 112-154; 126 Stat. 1208) is amended by striking ``2014'' 
and inserting ``2016''.
    (b) Repeal of Revival Provision.--Section 710(d) of the Honoring 
America's Veterans and Caring for Camp Lejeune Families Act of 2012 
(Public Law 112-154; 126 Stat. 1208) is amended by striking paragraph 
(3).
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 244 (Wednesday, December 20, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 65670]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30849]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--National Storage Industry Consortium

    Notice is hereby given that, on August 4, 1995, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), National Storage Industry 
Consortium (``NSIC'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Specifically, the identities of the new members of NSIC are: 
Commonwealth Scientific Corporation, Alexandria, VA; Headway 
Technologies, Milpitas, CA; KLA Instruments, San Jose, CA; Optitek, 
Mountain View, CA; Rochester Photonics, Rochester, NY; Saint-Gobain/
Norton Industrial Ceramics Corporation, Northboro, MA; Stormedia, Inc., 
Santa Clara, CA; Veeco Instruments, Inc., Plainview, NY; and Western 
Digital, Irvine, CA.
    The following member companies have changed their names: SDL, Inc. 
was formerly known as Spectra Diode Corporation, and Terabank Systems 
was formerly known as Virtual Storage Systems.
    NSIC's area of activity remains the sponsorship of research in the 
area of information storage technology.
    On June 12, 1991, NSIC filed its original notification pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on August 
13, 1991 (56 FR 38465).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on July 26, 
1994. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on April 13, 1995 (60 FR 18858).
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 95-30849 Filed 12-19-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 245 (Thursday, December 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 66334]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31001]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice No. 2308]


United States International Telecommunications Advisory 
Committee, Radiocommunication Sector, Working Parties of Study Group 9; 
Meeting

    The Department of State announces that the United States 
International Telecommunications Advisory Committee (ITAC), 
Radiocommunication Sector, Study Group 9, (Radio relay systems), 
Working Parties will meet on January 9 and 10, 1996 at the Federal 
Communication Commission, 2000 M Street, NW, Washington, DC 20554.
    The meetings will be convened as follows:

Working Party 9C (HF Systems)--January 9, 1:30 pm, Room 501.

    This meeting will address organizational and working plans for the 
coming cycle including consideration of Recommendation GT PLEN B (Annex 
1) for WRC-97.

Working Parties 9A (Performance and interface of radio relay systems), 
9B (Channel plans), and 9D (Sharing with other services except the 
fixed satellite service)--January 10, 9:30 am, Room 847.

    This joint meeting will address the development of a work plan for 
the coming cycle with emphasis on preparations of sharing studies 
required for WRC-97.

Joint Working Party 4-9/S (Sharing between the fixed service and fixed-
satellite service)--January 10, 1:30 pm, Room 847.

    This meeting will continue development of the work plan for the 
coming cycle.
    Members of the General Public may attend the meetings and join in 
the discussions, subject to the instructions of the Chairman. Those 
planning to attend the meeting should contact Mr. Alex Latker by phone 
at (202) 418-0767 or by fax at (202) 418-0765.

    Dated: December 11, 1995.
Warren G. Richards,
Chairman, U.S. ITAC for ITU-Radiocommunication Sector.
[FR Doc. 95-31001 Filed 12-20-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-45-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 241 (Friday, December 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64421-64422]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30608]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED

Procurement List; Additions

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Additions to the Procurement List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action adds to the Procurement List commodities to be 
furnished by nonprofit agencies employing persons who are blind or have 
other severe disabilities.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 15, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, Crystal Square 3, Suite 403, 1735 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Arlington, Virginia 22202-3461.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Milkman (703) 603-7740.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On September 29, 1995, the Committee for 
Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled published 
notice (60 FR 50559) of proposed additions to the Procurement List.
    After consideration of the material presented to it concerning 
capability of qualified nonprofit agencies to provide the commodities, 
fair market price, and impact of the additions on the current or most 
recent contractors, the Committee has determined that the commodities 
listed below are suitable for procurement by the Federal Government 
under 41 U.S.C. 46-48c and 41 CFR 51-2.4. I certify that the following 
action will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of 
small entities. The major factors considered for this certification 
were:
    1. The action will not result in any additional reporting, 
recordkeeping or other compliance requirements for small entities other 
than the small organizations that will furnish the commodities to the 
Government.
    2. The action will not have a severe economic impact on current 
contractors for the commodities.
    3. The action will result in authorizing small entities to furnish 
the commodities to the Government.
    4. There are no known regulatory alternatives which would 
accomplish the objectives of the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46-
48c) in connection with the commodities proposed for addition to the 
Procurement List.
    Accordingly, the following commodities are hereby added to the 
Procurement List:

Basin, Wash

6530-01-075-2723

Insert, Foam, Laminated

8135-00-NSH-0004

(Requirements for the Bureau of Mint, Washington, DC.)

    This action does not affect current contracts awarded prior to the 
effective 

[[Page 64422]]
date of this addition or options exercised under those contracts.
E.R. Alley, Jr.,
Deputy Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 95-30608 Filed 12-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-33-P
| 2006 OASDI Trustees Report |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|----------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--|
|                            |

 II. OVERVIEW 

II.D1 Short-Range OASDI Trust Fund Ratios

II.D2 OASDI Income and Cost Rates Under Intermediate Assumptions  

II.D3 Number of Covered Workers Per OASDI Beneficiary  
II.D4 Cumulative OASDI Income Less Cost, Based on Present Law Tax Rates and Scheduled Benefits  

II.D5 OASDI Cost and Scheduled Tax Revenue as a Percentaged of GDP  

II.D6 OASDI Annual Balances: 2005 and 2006 Trustees Reports

II.D7 Long-Range OASDI Trust Fund Ratios Under Alternative Assumptions 

IV. ACTUARIAL ESTIMATES

IV.A1 Short-Range OASI and DI Trust Fund Ratios

IV.B1 Long-Range OASI and DI Annual Income Rates and Cost Rates  

IV.B2 Number of OASDI Beneficiaries Per 100 Covered Workers

IV.B3 Long-Range OASI and DI Trust Fund Ratios

IV.B4 Test of Long-Range Close Actuarial Balance

IV.B5 OASDI Annual Balances: 2005 and 2006 Reports

V. ASSUMPTIONS AND METHODS UNDERLYING ACTUARIAL ESTIMATES 

V.C1 Primary-Insurance-Amount Formula for the 2006 Cohort

V.C2 Maximum-Family-Benefit Formula for the 2006 Cohort

V.C3 DI Disabled Worker Incidence Rates, 1970-2015

VI. APPENDICES

VI.E1 Annual Trust Fund Ratios

VI.E2 Annual Cost Rates

VI.F1 Estimated OASDI Income and Cost in Constant Dollars, Based on Intermediate Assumptions  
 Privacy Policy      | Website Policies        & Other Important Information      | Site Map     | Actuarial PublicationsMay 1, 2006
Filed 11/9/16 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2016 ND 207

Brian Joseph Shermer, Petitioner and Appellant

v.

State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20160115

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce B. Haskell, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Charles A. Stock, 407 N. Broadway, P.O. Box 605, Crookston, MN 56716- 0605, for petitioner and appellant.

Marina Spahr, Burleigh County Assistant State’s Attorney, 514 E. Thayer Ave., Bismarck ND 58501, for respondent and appellee.

Shermer v. State

No. 20160115

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Brian Shermer appeals from a district court order summarily dismissing his application for post-conviction relief.  Shermer argues the district court erred dismissing his application because the evidence he submitted generated a genuine issue of material fact regarding the factual basis of his guilty plea and he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his counsel did not object to the factual basis.  We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Dale V. Sandstrom
EXHIBIT 31


                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a
                           14(a)/15D-14(a) and SECTION
                          302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


I, Joey DiFrancesco, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive
officer) and principal financial officer of Raven Moon Entertainment, Inc. (the
"Registrant"), certify that:


1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I am responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

         a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and





Dated: May 19, 2006                         /s/  Joseph DiFrancesco
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Joey DiFrancesco, President,
                                                 Chief Executive Officer and
                                                 principal financial officer
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3234 

To provide for outreach and assistance to historically Black colleges and 

universities regarding Defense Innovation Unit programs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2021 

Mr. OSSOFF (for himself and Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Armed Services 

A BILL 

To provide for outreach and assistance to historically Black 

colleges and universities regarding Defense Innovation 

Unit programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘HBCU National Secu5 rity Innovation Act of 2021’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3234 IS

1 SEC. 2. OUTREACH TO HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES 

2 AND UNIVERSITIES AND MINORITY SERVING 

3 INSTITUTIONS REGARDING DEFENSE INNO4 VATION UNIT PROGRAMS THAT PROMOTE EN5 TREPRENEURSHIP AND INNOVATION AT IN6 STITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION. 

7 (a) PILOT PROGRAM.—The Under Secretary of De8 fense for Research and Engineering may establish activi9 ties, including outreach and technical assistance, to better 

10 connect historically Black colleges and universities and mi11 nority serving institutions to the programs of the Defense 

12 Innovation Unit and its associated programs. 

13 (b) BRIEFING.—Not later than one year after the 

14 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 

15 shall brief the congressional defense committees on the re16 sults of any activities conducted under subsection (a), in17 cluding the results of outreach efforts, the success of ex18 panding Defense Innovation Unit programs to historically 

19 Black colleges and universities and minority serving insti20 tutions, the barriers to expansion, and recommendations 

21 for how the Department of Defense and the Federal Gov22 ernment can support such institutions to successfully par23 ticipate in Defense Innovation Unit programs. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS