5712 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 3, 2016 / Notices 

3See Letter to All Interested Parties ‘‘Request for 

a New Shipper Review of Crystalline Silicon 

Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into 

Modules, from the People’s Republic of China 12/ 

01/2014–11/30/15: Anji DaSol Solar Energy Science 

& Technology Co., Ltd.,’’ dated January 21, 2016 

(‘‘CBP Data’’). 

4 Due to the business proprietary nature of the 

CBP data, see Initiation Checklist at Part I, question 

15 for further information. 

5See Letter to Anji DaSol, ‘‘Request for New 

Shipper Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on 

Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or 

Not Assembled Into Modules, from the People’s 

Republic of China,’’ dated January 21, 2016. 

6See NSR Request, at Exhibit 1. 

7 Id. at Exhibit 2. 

8See 19 CFR 351.214(g)(1)(i)(A). 

9See, generally, Memorandum to the File through 

Abdelali Elouaradia, Director, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office IV, ‘‘Initiation of Antidumping New Shipper 

Review of Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, 

Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, from the 

People’s Republic of China: Anji DaSol Solar 

Energy Science & Technology Co., Ltd., Initiation 

Checklist,’’ dated concurrently with this notice 

(‘‘Initiation Checklist’’). 

10See section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act; 19 CFR 

351.214(i). 

interested parties.3 Because the 

Department has certain concerns with 

the CBP entry data, on January 21, 2016, 

we also issued a questionnaire to Anji 

DaSol in order to seek additional 

information with respect the data.4 The 

Department intends to address these, 

and any remaining issues, after 

initiation of this NSR.5 We intend to 

request entry documents from CBP in 

order to confirm certain information 

reported by Anji DaSol. The 

continuation of the new shipper review 

will be contingent upon confirmation of 

the information reported in the review 

request. 

Anji DaSol stated that it is the 

producer and exporter of the subject 

merchandise upon which its request for 

a new shipper review is based. Pursuant 

to section 751(a)(2)(B)(i)(I) of the Act 

and 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(i), Anji DaSol 

certified that it did not export solar cells 

to the United States during the period 

of investigation (‘‘POI’’). In addition, 

pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(i)(II) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iii)(A), 

Anji DaSol certified that, since the 

initiation of the investigation, it has 

never been affiliated with any PRC 

exporter or producer who exported solar 

cells to the United States during the 

POI, including those not individually 

examined during the investigation. As 

required by 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iii)(B), 

Anji DaSol also certified that its export 

activities were not controlled by the 

central government of the PRC.6

In addition to the certifications 

described above, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.214(b)(2)(iv), Anji DaSol submitted 

documentation establishing the 

following: (1) The date on which the 

subject merchandise was first entered, 

or withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption in the United States; (2) 

the volume of its first shipment; and (3) 

the date of its first sale to an unaffiliated 

customer in the United States.7

The Department conducted a CBP 

database query and confirmed by 

examining the results that the sale of 

subject merchandise that Anji DaSol 

reported to the Department entered the 

United States during the POR specified 

by the Department’s regulations.8

Period of Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.214(g)(1)(i)(A), the POR for the new 

shipper review of Anji DaSol is 

December 1, 2014, through November 

30, 2015. 

Initiation of New Shipper Review 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B) of the 

Act, 19 CFR 351.214(b), and based on 

the information on the record, the 

Department finds that Anji DaSol meets 

the threshold requirements for initiation 

of a new shipper review of its shipment 

of solar cells from the PRC.9 However, 

if the information supplied by Anji 

DaSol is later found to be incorrect or 

insufficient during the course of this 

proceeding, the Department may rescind 

the review or apply facts available 

pursuant to section 776 of the Act, 

depending upon the facts on the record. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), 

the Department will publish the notice 

of initiation of a new shipper review no 

later than the last day of the month 

following the anniversary or semiannual 

anniversary month of the order. The 

Department intends to issue the 

preliminary results of this new shipper 

review no later than 180 days from the 

date of initiation, and the final results 

of this review no later than 90 days after 

the date the preliminary results are 

issued.10

It is the Department’s usual practice, 

in cases involving non-market 

economies (‘‘NME’’), to require that a 

company seeking to establish eligibility 

for an AD rate separate from the NMEwide entity rate provide evidence of de 

jure and de facto absence of government 

control over the company’s export 

activities. Accordingly, we will issue a 

questionnaire to Anji DaSol which will 

include a section requesting information 

with regard to its export activities for 

the purpose of establishing its eligibility 

for a separate rate. The new shipper 

review of Anji DaSol will proceed if the 

response provides sufficient indication 

that the exporter is not subject to either 

de jure or de facto government control 

with respect to its exports of solar cells. 

We will instruct CBP to allow, at the 

option of the importer, the posting, until 

the completion of the review, of a bond 

or security in lieu of a cash deposit for 

certain entries of the subject 

merchandise from Anji DaSol in 

accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B)(iii) 

of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(e). 

Because Anji DaSol certified that it 

exports and produces the subject 

merchandise that is the subject of this 

new shipper review, we will instruct 

CBP to permit the use of a bond only for 

entries of subject merchandise which 

Anji DaSol exported and produced. 

Interested parties requiring access to 

proprietary information in this new 

shipper review should submit 

applications for disclosure under 

administrative protective order in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305 and 

351.306. 

This initiation and notice are 

published in accordance with section 

751(a)(2)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.214 and 351.221(c)(1)(i). 

Dated: January 27, 2016. 

James Maeder, 

Senior Director Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations, Office I. 

[FR Doc. 2016–02002 Filed 2–2–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation; Opportunity to Request 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD 

Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 

482–4735. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Each year during the anniversary 

month of the publication of an 

antidumping or countervailing duty 

order, finding, or suspended 

investigation, an interested party, as 

defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), 

may request, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213, that the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) conduct 

an administrative review of that 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 3, 2016 / Notices 5713 

1Or the next business day, if the deadline falls 

on a weekend, federal holiday or any other day 

when the Department is closed. 

antidumping or countervailing duty 

order, finding, or suspended 

investigation. 

All deadlines for the submission of 

comments or actions by the Department 

discussed below refer to the number of 

calendar days from the applicable 

starting date. 

Respondent Selection 

In the event the Department limits the 

number of respondents for individual 

examination for administrative reviews 

initiated pursuant to requests made for 

the orders identified below, the 

Department intends to select 

respondents based on U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) data for U.S. 

imports during the period of review. We 

intend to release the CBP data under 

Administrative Protective Order 

(‘‘APO’’) to all parties having an APO 

within five days of publication of the 

initiation notice and to make our 

decision regarding respondent selection 

within 21 days of publication of the 

initiation Federal Register notice. 

Therefore, we encourage all parties 

interested in commenting on respondent 

selection to submit their APO 

applications on the date of publication 

of the initiation notice, or as soon 

thereafter as possible. The Department 

invites comments regarding the CBP 

data and respondent selection within 

five days of placement of the CBP data 

on the record of the review. 

In the event the Department decides 

it is necessary to limit individual 

examination of respondents and 

conduct respondent selection under 

section 777A(c)(2) of the Act: 

In general, the Department finds that 

determinations concerning whether 

particular companies should be 

‘‘collapsed’’ (i.e., treated as a single 

entity for purposes of calculating 

antidumping duty rates) require a 

substantial amount of detailed 

information and analysis, which often 

require follow-up questions and 

analysis. Accordingly, the Department 

will not conduct collapsing analyses at 

the respondent selection phase of this 

review and will not collapse companies 

at the respondent selection phase unless 

there has been a determination to 

collapse certain companies in a 

previous segment of this antidumping 

proceeding (i.e., investigation, 

administrative review, new shipper 

review or changed circumstances 

review). For any company subject to this 

review, if the Department determined, 

or continued to treat, that company as 

collapsed with others, the Department 

will assume that such companies 

continue to operate in the same manner 

and will collapse them for respondent 

selection purposes. Otherwise, the 

Department will not collapse companies 

for purposes of respondent selection. 

Parties are requested to (a) identify 

which companies subject to review 

previously were collapsed, and (b) 

provide a citation to the proceeding in 

which they were collapsed. Further, if 

companies are requested to complete 

the Quantity and Value Questionnaire 

for purposes of respondent selection, in 

general each company must report 

volume and value data separately for 

itself. Parties should not include data 

for any other party, even if they believe 

they should be treated as a single entity 

with that other party. If a company was 

collapsed with another company or 

companies in the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding 

where the Department considered 

collapsing that entity, complete quantity 

and value data for that collapsed entity 

must be submitted. 

Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for 

Administrative Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a 

party that requests a review may 

withdraw that request within 90 days of 

the date of publication of the notice of 

initiation of the requested review. The 

regulation provides that the Department 

may extend this time if it is reasonable 

to do so. In order to provide parties 

additional certainty with respect to 

when the Department will exercise its 

discretion to extend this 90-day 

deadline, interested parties are advised 

that, with regard to reviews requested 

on the basis of anniversary months on 

or after February 2016, the Department 

does not intend to extend the 90-day 

deadline unless the requestor 

demonstrates that an extraordinary 

circumstance prevented it from 

submitting a timely withdrawal request. 

Determinations by the Department to 

extend the 90-day deadline will be 

made on a case-by-case basis. 

The Department is providing this 

notice on its Web site, as well as in its 

‘‘Opportunity to Request Administrative 

Review’’ notices, so that interested 

parties will be aware of the manner in 

which the Department intends to 

exercise its discretion in the future. 

Opportunity To Request A Review: 

Not later than the last day of February 

2016,1 interested parties may request 

administrative review of the following 

orders, findings, or suspended 

investigations, with anniversary dates in 

February for the following periods: 

Period of review 

Antidumping Duty Proceedings 

Brazil: 

Frozen Warmwater Shrimp, A–351–838 ................................................................................................................................ 2/1/15–1/31/16 

Stainless Steel Bar, A–351–825 ............................................................................................................................................ 2/1/15–1/31/16 

France: Uranium, A–427–818 ....................................................................................................................................................... 2/1/15–1/31/16 

India: 

Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate, A–533–817 ............................................................................................ 2/1/15–1/31/16 

Certain Preserved Mushrooms, A–533–813 .......................................................................................................................... 2/1/15–1/31/16 

Frozen Warmwater Shrimp, A–533–840 ................................................................................................................................ 2/1/15–1/31/16 

Stainless Steel Bar, A–533–810 ............................................................................................................................................ 2/1/15–1/31/16 

Indonesia: 

Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate, A–560–805 ............................................................................................ 2/1/15–1/31/16 

Certain Preserved Mushrooms, A–560–802 .......................................................................................................................... 2/1/15–1/31/16 

Italy: Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings, A–475–828 ........................................................................................................... 2/1/15–1/31/16 

Japan: 

Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings, A–588–602 ................................................................................................................ 2/1/15–1/31/16 

Stainless Steel Bar, A–588–833 ............................................................................................................................................ 2/1/15–1/31/16 

Malaysia: Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Fittings, A–557–809 ............................................................................................................ 2/1/15–1/31/16 

Mexico: Large Residential Washers, A–201–842 ......................................................................................................................... 2/1/15–1/31/16 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

5714 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 3, 2016 / Notices 

2See also the Enforcement and Compliance Web 

site at http://trade.gov/enforcement/. 

3 In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1), parties 

should specify that they are requesting a review of 

entries from exporters comprising the entity, and to 

the extent possible, include the names of such 

exporters in their request. 

Period of review 

Phillippines: Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings, A–565–801 ................................................................................................ 2/1/15–1/31/16 

Republic of Korea: 

Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate, A–580–836 ............................................................................................ 2/1/15–1/31/16 

Large Residential Washers, A–580–868 ................................................................................................................................ 2/1/15–1/31/16 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam: 

Frozen Warmwater Shrimp, A–552–802 ................................................................................................................................ 2/1/15–1/31/16 

Steel Wire Garment Hangers, A–552–812 ............................................................................................................................ 2/1/15–1/31/16 

Utility Scale Wind Towers, A–552–814 .................................................................................................................................. 2/1/15–1/31/16 

Taiwan: Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products, A–583–853 ....................................................................................... 7/31/14–1/31/16 

Thailand: Frozen Warmwater Shrimp, A–549–822 ....................................................................................................................... 2/1/15–1/31/16 

The People’s Republic of China: 

Certain Preserved Mushrooms, A–570–851 .......................................................................................................................... 2/1/15–1/31/16 

Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products, A–570–010 .............................................................................................. 7/31/14–1/31/16 

Frozen Warmwater Shrimp, A–570–893 ................................................................................................................................ 2/1/15–1/31/16 

Heavy Forged Hand Tools,, With or Without Handles, A–570–803 ...................................................................................... 2/1/15–1/31/16 

Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes, A–570–929 ................................................................................................................. 2/1/15–1/31/16 

Uncovered Innerspring Units, A–570–928 ............................................................................................................................. 2/1/15–1/31/16 

Utility Scale Wind Towers, A–570–981 .................................................................................................................................. 2/1/15–1/31/16 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings 

India: 

Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate, C–533–818 ............................................................................................ 1/1/15–12/31/15 

Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand, C–533–829 .......................................................................................................... 1/1/15–12/31/15 

Indonesia: Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate, C–560–806 ................................................................................. 1/1/15 -12/31/15 

Republic of Korea: 

Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate, C–580–837 ............................................................................................ 1/1/15–12/31/15 

Large Residential Washers, C–580–869 ............................................................................................................................... 1/1/15–12/31/15 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Steel Wire Garment Hangers, C–552–813 .................................................................................. 1/1/15–12/31/15 

The People’s Republic of China: 

Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products, C–570–011 ............................................................................................. 6/10/14 -12/31/15 

Utility Scale Wind Towers, C–570–982 .................................................................................................................................. 1/1/15–12/31/15 

Suspension Agreements 

None 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(b), an interested party as 

defined by section 771(9) of the Act may 

request in writing that the Secretary 

conduct an administrative review. For 

both antidumping and countervailing 

duty reviews, the interested party must 

specify the individual producers or 

exporters covered by an antidumping 

finding or an antidumping or 

countervailing duty order or suspension 

agreement for which it is requesting a 

review. In addition, a domestic 

interested party or an interested party 

described in section 771(9)(B) of the Act 

must state why it desires the Secretary 

to review those particular producers or 

exporters. If the interested party intends 

for the Secretary to review sales of 

merchandise by an exporter (or a 

producer if that producer also exports 

merchandise from other suppliers) 

which was produced in more than one 

country of origin and each country of 

origin is subject to a separate order, then 

the interested party must state 

specifically, on an order-by-order basis, 

which exporter(s) the request is 

intended to cover. 

Note that, for any party the 

Department was unable to locate in 

prior segments, the Department will not 

accept a request for an administrative 

review of that party absent new 

information as to the party’s location. 

Moreover, if the interested party who 

files a request for review is unable to 

locate the producer or exporter for 

which it requested the review, the 

interested party must provide an 

explanation of the attempts it made to 

locate the producer or exporter at the 

same time it files its request for review, 

in order for the Secretary to determine 

if the interested party’s attempts were 

reasonable, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.303(f)(3)(ii). 

As explained in Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), and NonMarket Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of 

Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 

(October 24, 2011) the Department 

clarified its practice with respect to the 

collection of final antidumping duties 

on imports of merchandise where 

intermediate firms are involved. The 

public should be aware of this 

clarification in determining whether to 

request an administrative review of 

merchandise subject to antidumping 

findings and orders.2

Further, as explained in Antidumping 

Proceedings: Announcement of Change 

in Department Practice for Respondent 

Selection in Antidumping Duty 

Proceedings and Conditional Review of 

the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME 

Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 

65963 (November 4, 2013), the 

Department clarified its practice with 

regard to the conditional review of the 

non-market economy (NME) entity in 

administrative reviews of antidumping 

duty orders. The Department will no 

longer consider the NME entity as an 

exporter conditionally subject to 

administrative reviews. Accordingly, 

the NME entity will not be under review 

unless the Department specifically 

receives a request for, or self-initiates, a 

review of the NME entity.3 In 

administrative reviews of antidumping 

duty orders on merchandise from NME 

countries where a review of the NME 

entity has not been initiated, but where 

an individual exporter for which a 

review was initiated does not qualify for 

a separate rate, the Department will 

issue a final decision indicating that the 

company in question is part of the NME 

entity. However, in that situation, 

because no review of the NME entity 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 3, 2016 / Notices 5715 

4See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; 

Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 

39263 (July 6, 2011). 

was conducted, the NME entity’s entries 

were not subject to the review and the 

rate for the NME entity is not subject to 

change as a result of that review 

(although the rate for the individual 

exporter may change as a function of the 

finding that the exporter is part of the 

NME entity). 

Following initiation of an 

antidumping administrative review 

when there is no review requested of the 

NME entity, the Department will 

instruct CBP to liquidate entries for all 

exporters not named in the initiation 

notice, including those that were 

suspended at the NME entity rate. 

All requests must be filed 

electronically in Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’) 

on Enforcement and Compliance’s 

ACCESS Web site at http://

access.trade.gov.4 Further, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(l)(i), 

a copy of each request must be served 

on the petitioner and each exporter or 

producer specified in the request. 

The Department will publish in the 

Federal Register a notice of ‘‘Initiation 

of Administrative Review of 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation’’ for requests received by 

the last day of February 2016. If the 

Department does not receive, by the last 

day of February 2016, a request for 

review of entries covered by an order, 

finding, or suspended investigation 

listed in this notice and for the period 

identified above, the Department will 

instruct CBP to assess antidumping or 

countervailing duties on those entries at 

a rate equal to the cash deposit of (or 

bond for) estimated antidumping or 

countervailing duties required on those 

entries at the time of entry, or 

withdrawal from warehouse, for 

consumption and to continue to collect 

the cash deposit previously ordered. 

For the first administrative review of 

any order, there will be no assessment 

of antidumping or countervailing duties 

on entries of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption during the relevant 

provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period of 

the order, if such a gap period is 

applicable to the period of review. 

This notice is not required by statute 

but is published as a service to the 

international trading community. 

Dated: January 28, 2016. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2016–02007 Filed 2–2–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request 

The Department of Commerce will 

submit to the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) for clearance the 

following proposal for collection of 

information under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 

Chapter 35). 

Agency: National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 

Title: Interim Capital Constructions 

Fund Agreement, Family of Forms, 

Certification and Deposit/Withdrawal 

Report. 

OMB Control Number: 0648–0041. 

Form Number(s): NOAA Forms 34–82 

and 88–14. 

Type of Request: Regular (extension of 

a currently approved information 

collection). 

Number of Respondents: 1,445. 

Average Hours per Response: Deposit/ 

withdrawal form, 20 minutes; 

application for program benefits, 3 

hours and 30 minutes; certificate, 1 

hour. 

Burden Hours: 2,732. 

Needs and Uses: This request is for 

extension of a currently approved 

information collection. 

Respondents will be commercial 

fishing industry individuals, 

partnerships, and corporations which 

entered into Capital Construction Fund 

(CCF) agreements with the Secretary of 

Commerce allowing deferral of Federal 

taxation on fishing vessel income 

deposited into the fund for use in the 

acquisition, construction, or 

reconstruction of fishing vessels. 

Deferred taxes are recaptured by 

reducing an agreement vessel’s basis for 

depreciation by the amount withdrawn 

from the fund for its acquisition, 

construction, or reconstruction. The 

interim Capital Construction Fund 

Agreement and Certificate Family of 

Forms is required pursuant to 50 CFR 

part 259.30 and P.L. 99–514 (The Tax 

Reform Act, 1986). The deposit/

withdrawal information collected from 

agreement holders is required pursuant 

to 50 CFR part 259.35 and P.L. 99–514. 

The information collected from 

applicants for the Interim CCF 

Agreement is used to determine their 

eligibility to participate in the CCF 

Program. The information collected 

from agreement holders for the 

Certificate Family of Forms is used to 

identify their program eligible vessels, 

their program projects and to certify the 

cost of a project at completion. The 

information collected on the deposit/

withdrawal report form is required to 

ensure that agreement holders are 

complying with fund deposit/

withdrawal requirements established in 

program regulations and properly 

accounting for fund activity on their 

Federal income tax returns. The 

information collected on the deposit/

withdrawal report must also be reported 

semi-annually to the Secretary of 

Treasury in accordance with the Tax 

Reform Act. 

Affected Public: Businesses or other 

for-profit organizations. 

Frequency: One time only, annually 

and on occasion. 

Respondent’s Obligation: Required to 

obtain or retain benefits. 

This information collection request 

may be viewed at reginfo.gov. Follow 

the instructions to view Department of 

Commerce collections currently under 

review by OMB. 

Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collection should be sent 

within 30 days of publication of this 

notice to OIRA_Submission@

omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395–5806. 

Dated: January 29, 2016. 

Sarah Brabson, 

NOAA PRA Clearance Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2016–01983 Filed 2–2–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–22–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Department of the Army 

[Docket ID: USA–2016–HQ–0002] 

Privacy Act of 1974; System of 

Records 

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD. 

ACTION: Notice to delete a System of 

Records. 

SUMMARY: The Department of the Army 

proposes to delete a system of records, 

A0351 AMC, ‘‘Student/Faculty Records: 

AMC Schools Systems’’ in its inventory 

of record systems subject to the Privacy 

Act of 1974, as amended. This system 

was used to determine applicant 

eligibility, monitor individual’s 

progress, maintain record of student/

faculty achievements, and to provide 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES