[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 243 (Tuesday, December 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65357-65358]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30759]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 95-114]


National Environmental Policy Act; Mars Global Surveyor Mission

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Finding of no significant impact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 
1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq.), the Council on 
Environmental Quality (CEQ) Regulations for Implementing the Procedural 
Provisions of NEPA (40 CFR Parts 1500-1508), and NASA policy and 
procedures (14 CFR Part 1216 Subpart 1216.3), NASA has made a finding 
of no significant impact (FONSI) with respect to the proposed Mars 
Global Surveyor (MGS) mission, which would involve a flight to and 
orbit about Mars. The baseline mission calls for the MGS spacecraft to 
be launched aboard a Delta II 7925 from Cape Canaveral Air Station 
(CCAS), Florida, in November 1996.

DATES: Comments on the FONSI must be provided in writing to NASA on or 
before January 18, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be addressed to Ms. Mary Kaye Olsen, 
NASA Headquarters, Code SLP, 300 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20546. The 
Environmental Assessment (EA) prepared for the MGS mission which 
supports this FONSI may be reviewed at the following locations:
    (a) NASA Headquarters, Library, Room 1J20, 300 E Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20546.
    (b) Spaceport USA, Room 2001, John F. Kennedy Space Center, 
Florida, 32899. Please call Lisa Fowler beforehand at 407-867-2468 so 
that arrangements can be made.

[[Page 65358]]

    (c) Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Visitors Lobby, Building 249, 4800 
Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109 (818-354-5179).
    The EA may also be examined at the following NASA locations by 
contacting the pertinent Freedom of Information Act Office:
    (d) NASA, Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035 (415-604-
4190).
    (e) NASA, Dryden Flight Research Center, Edwards, CA 93523 (805-
258-3448).
    (f) NASA, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771 (301-
286-0730).
    (g) NASA, Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX 77058 (713-483-8612).
    (h) NASA, Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23665 (804-864-
6125).
    (i) NASA, Lewis Research Center, 21000 Brookpark Road, Cleveland, 
OH 44135 (216-433-2313).
    (j) NASA, Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL 35812 (205-
544-5252).
    (k) NASA, Stennis Space Center, MS 39529 (601-688-2164).
    A limited number of copies of the EA are available by contacting 
Ms. Mary Kaye Olsen at the address or telephone number indicated 
herein.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Kaye Olsen, 202-358-0304.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NASA has reviewed the EA prepared for the 
MGS mission and has determined that it represents an accurate and 
adequate analysis of the scope and level of associated environmental 
impacts. The EA is incorporated by reference in this FONSI.
    NASA is proposing to launch the MGS mission, which would deliver a 
single polar-orbiting spacecraft to Mars in 1997. MGS would be inserted 
into an elliptical capture orbit in September 1997 and, over the next 4 
months, would use thruster firings and aerobraking techniques to reach 
a nearly circular, low-altitude, polar-mapping orbit. The orbit would 
allow the spacecraft to be illuminated by the sun in the same way 
throughout the Martian year. Aerobraking, a technique which uses the 
forces of atmospheric drag to slow the spacecraft for orbital 
maneuvers, would provide a means of minimizing the amount of fuel 
required to reach the final low Mars mapping orbit. The spacecraft 
carries no radioactive material. The proposed action calls for using a 
Delta II 7925 launch vehicle with a Payload Assist Module-Delta (PAM-D) 
upper stage to inject the MGS spacecraft into an Earth-Mars trajectory 
in November 1996.
    The science objectives for the MGS mission are to fulfill most of 
the critical science objectives of the failed Mars Observer mission. To 
satisfy the mission's purpose, the MGS spacecraft would carry nearly a 
full duplicate of the Mars Observer instrument payload, and would use 
those instruments to acquire Mars surface data for a full Martian year 
(approximately 2 Earth years). These objectives include detailed global 
maps of surface topography, the distribution of minerals, the planet's 
mass, size, and shape, the characterization of Mars' gravitational and 
magnetic fields, and the monitoring of global weather. These data and 
investigations could help scientists better understand the current 
state of water on Mars, the evolution of the planet's formation and 
atmosphere, and the factors that led to major changes in the Martian 
climate. Other data acquired from this mission could provide insight 
into the evolution of both Earth and the solar system. MGS could then 
support possible future Mars missions, by providing relay capability 
for surface science stations and landers.
    Alternatives that were evaluated include (1) No-Action (i.e., no 
Mars Global Surveyor mission); and (2) launch vehicles options, 
including the Space Shuttle, Titan, and Atlas configurations, foreign 
launch vehicles, as well as other Delta configurations. Failure to 
undertake the MGS mission would disrupt the execution of NASA's Solar 
System Exploration Program, as defined by the Agency's Solar System 
Exploration Committee. Cancellation of the MGS mission would leave a 
gap in the orderly exploration of Mars, and would retard NASA's 
attainment of scientific data on the surface and atmosphere of Mars, 
which is critical to future explorations of Mars. Of the launch 
vehicles evaluated, the Delta II 7925/PAM-D most closely matches the 
MGS mission requirements, has superior reliability, minimizes adverse 
environmental impacts, and is also the lowest in cost.
    Expected impacts to the human environment associated with the 
mission arise almost entirely from the normal launch of the Delta II 
7925. Air emissions from the exhaust produced by the solid propellant 
graphite epoxy motors and liquid first stage primarily include carbon 
monoxide, hydrochloric acid, aluminum oxide in soluble and insoluble 
forms, carbon dioxide, and deluge water mixed with propellant by-
products. Air impacts will be short-term and not substantial. Short-
term water quality and noise impacts, as well as short-term effects on 
wetlands, plants, and animals, would occur in the vicinity of the 
launch complex. These short-term impacts are of a nature to be self-
correcting, and none of these effects would be substantial. There would 
be no impact on threatened or endangered species or critical habitat, 
cultural resources, or floodplains. Accident scenarios have also been 
addressed.
    The second stage would be ignited at an altitude of 129 kilometers 
(80 miles), which is in the ionosphere. Although the second stage would 
achieve orbit, its orbital decay time would fall below the limit NASA 
has set for orbital debris consideration. After burning its propellant 
to depletion, the second stage would remain in low Earth orbit until 
its orbit eventually decayed. The MGS Project has followed the NASA 
guidelines regarding orbital debris and minimizing the risk of human 
casualty for uncontrolled reentry into the Earth's atmosphere. No other 
impacts of environmental concern have been identified.
    The level and scope of environmental impacts associated with the 
launch of the Delta II 7925 vehicle are well within the envelope of 
impacts that have been addressed in previous FONSI's concerning other 
launch vehicles and spacecraft. No significant new circumstances or 
information relevant to environmental concerns associated with the 
launch vehicle have been identified which would affect the earlier 
findings.
    On the basis of the MGS EA, NASA has determined that the 
environmental impacts associated with the mission would not 
individually or cumulatively have a significant impact on the quality 
of the human environment. NASA will take no final action prior to the 
expiration of the 30-day comment period.

    Dated: December 13, 1995.
Wesley T. Huntress, Jr.,
Associate Administrator for Space Science.
[FR Doc. 95-30759 Filed 12-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M