alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**CERTIFICATIONI, Kevin Murphy, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of SteelCloud, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.              Date: June 22, 2006 By: /s/ Kevin Murphy           Name: Kevin Murphy    Title: Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Election Commission.

# DATE AND TIME: 

Thursday, January 28, 2016 at 10:00 a.m.

# PLACE:

 999 E Street NW., Washington, DC (ninth floor).

# STATUS:

 This meeting will be open to the public.

## Federal Register Notice of Previous Announcement—81 FR 4299

# CHANGE IN THE MEETING:

 The January 28, 2016 meeting has been cancelled.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Shelley E. Garr,

Deputy Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2016-01847 Filed 1-28-16; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
#### Anna F. Travers, Respondent, v. Herbert L. Satterlee and others, Appellants.

— Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Van Brunt, P. J.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0004805 29-AUG-2014 09:00 AM
Exhibit
10.1


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE GFI GROUP INC.


2008 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN


 


This First Amendment (this “First Amendment”) to the 2008 Equity
Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) of
GFI Group Inc. (the “Company”)
has been deemed advisable and has been adopted pursuant to the terms of Section 10.1
of the Plan by the Company’s Board of Directors, subject to stockholder
approval. Terms used herein but not otherwise defined shall have the meanings
given to such terms in the Plan.


 


1.                                      Amendments to the Plan.


 


a)                                      The first
sentence of Article 4.1 of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting “8,250,000”
and substituting “14,900,000” therefor.


 


b)                                     The last
sentence of Article 6.8 of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting “1,000,000”
and substituting “2,000,000” therefor.


 


2.                                      The Plan.  In all other respects the Plan is ratified
and shall, as so changed by this First Amendment, continue in full force and
effect.


 


* * * * *
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 21 (Tuesday, February 2, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 5484]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-01792]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-468 and 731-TA-1166-1167 (Review)]


Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks From China and Mexico

Determinations

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission 
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, that 
revocation of the countervailing duty order on certain magnesia carbon 
bricks from China and the antidumping duty orders on certain magnesia 
carbon bricks from China and Mexico would be likely to lead to 
continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the 
United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), instituted these reviews on August 3, 2015 
(80 FR 46050) and determined on November 6, 2015 that it would conduct 
expedited reviews (80 FR 74799, November 30, 2015).
    The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) 
of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed 
its determinations in these reviews on January 15, 2016. The views of 
the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4589 (January 2016), 
entitled Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks from China and Mexico: 
Investigation Nos. 701-TA-468 and 731-TA-1166-1167 (Review).

    Issued: January 27, 2016.

    By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2016-01792 Filed 2-1-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 6886]

                    Pursuant to section 7086(c)(2) of the Department of State, Foreign                           ( print page 3954)                        Operations, and Related Programs Appropriation Act, 2010 (Division F, Pub. L. 111-117) (“the Act”), and Department of State Delegation of Authority Number 245-1, I hereby determine that it is important to the national interest of the United States to waive the requirements of section 7086(c)(1) of the Act with respect to the Government of Egypt, and I hereby waive such restriction.                

                    This determination shall be reported to Congress, and published in the                     **Federal Register.**

Dated: January 11, 2010.

Jacob J. Lew,

Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources.

[FR Doc. 2010-1351 Filed 1-22-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-31-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 11, 2022

No. 04-22-00259-CR

EX PARTE Juan Gabriel COLORADO CARRILLO,

From the County Court, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10367CR

Honorable Roland Andrade, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant filed his reply brief on September 26, 2022, and an amended motion to exceed 

the word limit on September 27, 2022. Appellant’s amended motion for leave to exceed word 

limit is GRANTED.

It is so ORDERED on October 11, 2022.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT

FILE COPY
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 238 (Tuesday, December 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 63713]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30228]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
[FEMA-1069-DR]


Florida; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Florida (FEMA-1069-DR), dated October 4, 1995, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 29, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pauline C. Campbell, Response and 
Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, 
DC 20472, (202) 646-3606.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, effective this 
date and pursuant to the authority vested in the Director of the 
Federal Emergency Management Agency under Executive Order 12148, I 
hereby appoint Michael J. Polny of the Federal Emergency Management 
Agency to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this declared 
disaster.
    This action terminates my appointment of Glenn C. Woodard as 
Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance)
James L. Witt,
Director.
[FR Doc. 95-30228 Filed 12-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Apple REIT Eight, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as
  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial
  conditions and results of operations of the Company as of December 31, 2010, and for the period then ended.



|/s/ GLADEM. KNIGHT
    
    Glade M. KnightChief Executive Officer
|------------------------------------------------------------------

|/s/ BRYANPEERY
    
    Bryan PeeryChief Financial OfficerMarch 11, 2011
|------------------------------------------------------------------------



---
Exhibit 10.18





NOTE: Portions of this Exhibit are the subject of a Confidential Treatment Request by the Registrant to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”).  Such portions have been redacted and are marked with a “[***]” in the place of the redacted language.  The redacted information has been filed separately with the Commission.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------








First Amendment of Supplement to Distribution Agreement





This is an Amendment to the Supplement to Distribution Agreement dated July 27, 2010 (“the Agreement”) between Alpha & Omega Semiconductor (Hong Kong) Limited (“AOS”) and Promate Electronic Co., Ltd. (the “Distributor”).  This Amendment will come into effect from April 21, 2011 (“Effective Date”) after it is duly signed by both parties. All expressions not defined here shall have the same meaning as they have in the Agreement. Except to the extent modified by this Amendment, all provisions of the Agreement shall remain in effect.  The parties agree following amendments to the Agreement:





Revise the “Stock Rotation Program 2)”





From:


“Stock Rotation dollar amount is limited up to [***] guarantee and [***] AOS discretionary of net billings for the current three-month period.”





To:


“Stock Rotation dollar amount is limited up to [***] guarantee and [***] AOS discretionary, conditioned upon Distributor's adhering to AOS's backlog and inventory management guidelines as below:


|   |                                                                                                                                                  
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|i) | Distributor maintains backlog within a 4 month window (unless otherwise approved by AOS in writing) with minimal pull-ins and push-outs (by CRD);

|    |                                                                                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|ii) | Distributor plans backlog to achieve 2 month inventory target based on customer's POS forecast;

|     |                                                                                                               
|---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|iii) | Products that were grossly over-ordered will not be eligible for the [***] AOS discretionary Stock Rotation. ”







AOS                                                                             Distributor


By: /s/ Phil Lee  By: /s/ C.L.Hsieh


Name & Title:  Phil Lee, General Manager  Name & Title: C.L. Hsieh, VP








***CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION***
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7534]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3065]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-62-001]


Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.; Notice of Compliance Filing

February 2, 1995.
    Take notice that on January 30, 1995, Tennessee Gas Pipeline 
Company (Tennessee), filed certain information in compliance with the 
December 30, 1994 Order issued by the Commission in Docket No. RP95-62-
000 (Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co., 69 FERC 61,429 (1994)). Tennessee 
states that the filing is in response to questions raised by the 
Commission in its December 30th Order regarding stranded Account No. 
858 cost recovery treatment of Tennessee's transportation-by-others 
contracts.
    Tennessee states that copies of the filing have been mailed to all 
of its jurisdictional customers and affected state regulatory 
commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest with reference to said filing should 
file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North 
Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with 
Section 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 
Section 385.211. All such protests should be filed on or before 
February 9, 1995. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to this proceeding. Copies of this filing are 
on file and available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-3065 Filed 2-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### STATE v. JOHN FLOOD.

(Filed 16 September, 1925.)

Appeal by defendant from *Sinclair, J.,*at March Term, 1925, of the Superior Court of Edgecombe. '

The defendant was convicted of a breach of the prohibition law and from the judgment he appealed.

*Attorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.*

Pee Cueiam.

The defendant in apt time moved to set aside the verdict on the ground of newly discovered evidence. His Honor heard oral testimony not available to the defendant at the trial and in his discretion denied the motion. In this, we find no error. The motion, of course, cannot be entertained in this Court. *S. v. Jenkins,*182 N. C., 818. The demurrer to the evidence and the motion to vacate the verdict on the ground that the State’s evidence was insufficient were properly overruled. There are no other assignments of error.

No error.
EXHIBIT A 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5273-1 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 13:41:19 Page 1

of 8
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5273-1 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 13:41:19 Page 2

of 8
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5273-1 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 13:41:19 Page 3

of 8
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5273-1 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 13:41:19 Page 4

of 8
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5273-1 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 13:41:19 Page 5

of 8
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5273-1 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 13:41:19 Page 6

of 8
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5273-1 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 13:41:19 Page 7

of 8
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5273-1 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 13:41:19 Page 8

of 8
**Exhibit 35.1**




**SERVICER
      COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)**






RE: FIRST
      HORIZON ALTERNATIVE MORTGAGE SECURITIES TRUST 2007-FA1




We,
      the
      undersigned authorized officers of First Horizon Home Loans, a division of
      First
      Tennessee Bank National Association, and First Tennessee Bank National
      Association, as successor by merger to First Tennessee Mortgage Services, Inc.
      (collectively, the “Servicer”), pursuant to the applicable servicing agreement,
      do hereby certify that:




1.  A
      review
      of the Servicer’s activities during the period from February 1, 2007 and through
      December 31, 2007 and of the Servicer’s performance under the above described
      servicing agreement has been made under our supervision.




2.  To
      the
      best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all
      of
      its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material
      respects throughout such period .






Date:
      March 24, 2008




First
      Horizon Home Loans, a
      division of First Tennessee Bank National Association





By:
      /s/  Kim
      Yowell


Name:
      Kim
      Yowell


Title:
      SVP, Servicing Manager








First
      Tennessee Bank National Association, as successor by merger to First Tennessee
      Mortgage Services, Inc.





By:
      /s/ Terry
      L. McCoy


Name:
      Terry L. McCoy


Title:
      Executive Vice President
#### THELMA PARKER v. E. S. YOUNCE and HAROLD GARDNER.

(Filed 27 February, 1957.)

Appeal by defendant Gardner from *Frizzelle, J.,*October Term, 1956, of Beaufort.

Civil action growing out of a collision that occurred 6 March, 1954, at night, on a paved highway known as Whichard’s Beach Road, between a Plymouth car, owned and operated by plaintiff, and a pickup truck operated by defendant Gardner, resulting in damage to plaintiff’s car.

Defendant Younce is not a party to this appeal. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence, judgment of nonsuit was entered as to him. Thereupon, he abandoned his alleged counterclaim.

Motions for judgment of nonsuit made by defendant Gardner were overruled; and, as between plaintiff and defendant Gardner, three issues were submitted to the jury. The jury answered the negligence issue, “Yes,” the contributory negligence issue, “No,” and awarded damages in the amount of $382.45.

From judgment in plaintiff’s favor, in accordance with verdict, defendant Gardner appealed, assigning errors.

*591
      *S. M. Blount for plaintiff, appellee.*

*LeRoy Scott for defendant, appellant.*

PER Cueiam.

The conclusion reached is that the evidence, when considered in the light most favorable to plaintiff, presented a case for jury determination on the issues submitted. Moreover, consideration of appellant’s assignments of error relating to rulings on evidence and to the charge fails to disclose any error of law deemed of sufficient prejudicial effect to warrant a new trial. Hence, the verdict and judgment will not be disturbed.

No error.