alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Legal Services Corporation

# AGENCY:

Legal Services Corporation.

# ACTION:

Correction Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        On January 20, 2016, the Legal Services Corporation (LSC) published a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         (81 FR 3162) titled “Request for Letters of Intent To Apply for 2015 Technology Initiative Grant Funding.” The title to this notice contained a typographical error. This document corrects the notice by revising the title.                    

# DATES:

This correction is effective January 20, 2016

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mark Freedman, Senior Associate General Counsel, Legal Services Corporation, 3333 K Street NW., Washington, DC 20007; (202) 295-1500;                         *mfreedman@lsc.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The title should read “Request for Letters of Intent to Apply for 2016 Technology Initiative Grant Funding.”

Dated: January 27, 2016.

Katherine Ward,

Executive Assistant to the Vice President for Legal Affairs and General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2016-01765 Filed 1-29-16; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7050-01-P
Exhibit 32.2



Certifications



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Keystone Automotive Operations, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months period ended April 2, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |     |  |                                                     
|------------------ |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 16, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ BRYANT P. BYNUM                                 
|                   |  |     |  | Bryant P. Bynum                                     
|                   |  |     |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, William Augustin IV, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of Bear Stearns ALT-A Trust 2007-1 (the "Exchange Act
    periodic reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
    servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
    conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
    this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
    in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
    their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material
    respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP as Servicer.

    Dated:   March 30, 2008


    /s/ William Augustin IV
    Signature

    Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master
    servicer)
In addition, the Plan isintended to be exempt from the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code and anyregulations issued under Section 409A (collectively, “Section 409A”), and to the extent thePlan is not so exempt, to comply with Section 409A. To the extent that any provision in the Planis ambiguous as to its compliance with Section 409A, the provision shall be read in such a mannerso that all payments under the Plan shall not incur an “additional tax” within the meaning ofSection 409A(a)(1)(B) of the Code. Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, theCompany does not guarantee the tax treatment of any payments or benefits under the Plan, whetherpursuant to the Code, federal, state or local tax laws or regulations. Furthermore, this Plan isnot an employee benefit plan under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) and shallnot be treated or interpreted as an ERISA plan.
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

((((((((((((((((

No. 12-0311

((((((((((((((((

Barbara Marino, M.D., Petitioner

v.

WENDY WILKINS, Respondent

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

**ORDER**

1.Pursuant to the notice of bankruptcy of *Barbara Marino, M.D*., filed with this Court on July 6, 2012, this case is **ABATED** effective as of June 27, 2012.  

2.This case is abated pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 8.2 until further order of this Court and is removed from the Court's active docket, subject to reinstatement upon proper motion. Tex. R. App. P. 8.3. All motions and other documents pending or filed are abated subject to being reurged in the event the case is reinstated. Tex. R. App. P. 8.2 and 8.3. The Court directs the parties to notify the Court of all events affecting the status of this case, and, in any event, to file a status report by January 14, 2013.

Done at the City of Austin, this 13th day of July, 2012.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

Supreme Court of Texas

By Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk
#### John A. Husted, Appellant, v. Edward H. Birdsell, Respondent.

— Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Dykman, J.
#### Andrew Wils v. Conrad Huber.

— Motion denied.
#### ST. LOUIS-SAN FRANCISCO RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant, v. RAILROAD YARDMASTERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Appellee.

No. 21912.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

June 28, 1965.

Martin M. Lucente, Chicago, 111., Ernest D. Grinnell, Jr., Paul R. Moody, St. Louis, Mo., Judge Gambill, Fort Worth, Tex., Robert E. Burns, Dallas, Tex., Harry McCall, Jr., Chaffe, McCall, Phillips, Burke, Toler & Hopkins, New Orleans, La., Sidley, Austin, Burgess & Smith, Chicago, 111., for defendant-appellant, Allen, Gambill & Gambill, Fort Worth, Tex., Burford, Ryburn & Ford, Dallas, Tex., of counsel.

Charles J. Morris, Dallas, Tex., for appellee, Mullinax, Wells, Morris & Mauzy, Dallas, Tex., of counsel.

Before WOODBURY* JONES and GEWIN, Circuit Judges.

*

 Senior Judge of the First Circuit, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM.

When the substantive issue involved in this case was decided by the National Railway Adjustment Board, this Court dismissed the appeal as moot. The appellant has, by motion, urged that our judgment dismissing the appeal be recalled and vacated and that we reverse the injunctive order of the district court and direct that the complaint be dismissed. We conclude that the motion should be granted. The approved procedure, when a case has become moot while an appeal is pending, is to vacate or reverse the order or judgment from *984which the appeal was taken, “with directions * * * to dismiss the bill of complaint * * *, because the controversy involved has become moot and, therefore, no longer a subject appropriate for judicial action.” Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. v. Anchor Coal Co., 279 U.S. 812, 49 S.Ct. 262, 73 L.Ed. 971. See also United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36; Duke Power Co. v. Greenwood County, 299 U.S. 259, 57 S.Ct. 202, 81 L.Ed. 178; Brownlow v. Schwartz, 261 U.S. 216, 43 S.Ct. 263, 67 L.Ed. 620; Atherton Mills v. Johnston, 259 U.S. 13, 42 S.Ct. 422, 66 L.Ed. 814; United States v. Hamburg-American Line, 239 U.S. 466, 36 S.Ct. 212, 60 L.Ed. 387. But see Verret v. Oil Transport Co., 365 U.S. 768, 81 S.Ct. 911, 6 L.Ed.2d 83.

Our reversal of the district court’s injunctive order is not to be regarded as a determination of the propriety of the issuance of the order. The sole ground of our reversal is that the cause has become moot.

The judgment of this Court dismissing the appeal is recalled, vacated and set aside. The order of the district court is vacated and the cause is remanded with directions to dismiss the complaint and the action.

Prior judgment recalled and vacated.

Reversed and remanded.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# COMMANDCHAPLAIN

## Chaplain Information

## **United States Space CommandCommand Chaplain**

### **Accessibility and Availability to all staff100 Percent Confidential Counseling**

##  

### **U.S. Air Force Col. Mark F. ThomasUSSPACECOM Command Chaplain**

#### 719-554-3623; DSN 692-3623mark.thomas.6@usspacecom.mil

### **U.S. Air Force MSgt. Kristen N. AllenSenior Enlisted Leader, Religious Affairs**

#### 719-554-3610; DSN 692-3610USSPACECOM.J040.Command-Chaplain@us.af.mil

#  

## Additional Resources

#### **Additional Resources**

Space Force Chaplain719-554-3610; DSN: 692-3610

Peterson Chapel Team719-556-4442; DSN: 834-4442

Schriever Chapel Team 719-567-3705; DSN: 560-3705

#### **QUICK LINKS**

#### Accessibility  |  Section 508    Web PolicySite Map  |  Defense.gov  |  Intel.govQuestions  |  Privacy and SecurityContact Us  |  Inspector General  |  FOIAOPM.gov  |  Plain Writing Act | MISONo Fear Act  |  Links DisclaimerUSA.gov  |  DoD Open Government

                  - Facebook
                  - X
                  - YouTube
                  - LinkedIn
                  - Civilian Careers

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### In the Matter of the Application of Ephraim B. Tillotson and another, as Overseer of the Poor of the Town of Cazenovia, Appellants, v. Edward Smith, to Compel the Support of James Smith, a Poor Relative, Respondent.

Order of the Court of Sessions reversed and the proceedings remitted for further action, without costs. Opinion by

Board-man, J.
#### Sophia Boeram v. Jennie E. Fletcher, Impleaded.

Order affirmed, with costs and isbursements.
Sandra M. Albelo

Oficial Técnico Chefe Nível 5, Exército dos EUA 

Oficial Técnico Chefe de Comando

Comando Sul dos EUA

A Oficial Técnico Chefe Nível 5 (CW5, por sua sigla em inglês) Sandra 

M. Albelo é natural da Colômbia, na América do Sul, e é fluente em

espanhol. Em 1991, ela emigrou para os EUA e, em 1996, alistou-se no

Exército dos EUA como especialista em recursos humanos. Em 2005,

ela foi declarada Oficial Técnica.

Sandra desempenhou as funções de Assistente do Diretor Executivo (AXO) 

e principal conselheira do Vice-Chefe do Estado-Maior do Exército (VCSA) 

para todas as operações e atividades de recursos humanos. Outras funções 

odesempenhadas incluem as de oficial técnica sênior e gestora de pessoal

pessoal do gabinete de gestão de oficiais generais, Pentágono; gestor de

Forças, G1 Exército dos EUA na Europa; AXO do comandante-geral, Exército dos EUA na Europa; oficial 

encarregada, S1, Batalhão de Transição de Guerreiros e técnico em recursos humanos, Fort Campbell, Kentucky; 

Gestor, Programa de Descanso e Recuperação/oficial de contratação do Comando Central do Exército, Camp Arifjan, 

Kuwait; técnica em recursos humanos e planejadora, 101a Companhia de Recursos Humanos, Fort Campbell, 

Kentucky; oficial encarregada da terminal de pessoal e passageiros, Camp Speicher, Iraque; chefe do gabinete de 

pessoal militar, 101o Batalhão de Serviços de Pessoal, Fort Campbell, Kentucky. 

CW5 Albelo é membro com direito de voto do Conselho de Oficiais Técnicos Seniores do Exército, que assessora ao 

Chefe do Estado-Maior do Exército no desenvolvimento futuro do Grupo de Oficiais Técnicos por meio de políticas e 

iniciativas integradas que afetam a admissão, a retenção, o emprego e o desenvolvimento de Oficiais Técnicos. 

Os destacamentos da CW5 Albelo incluem a Operação Liberdade no Iraque (Iraqi Freedom), Camp Liberty, Bagdá, 

Iraque, em 2005; Camp Speicher, Iraque, em 2006; e Camp Arifjan, Kuwait, em 2008.

AOs prêmios e condecorações da CW5 Albelo incluem a Legião de Mérito, a Medalha de Serviço Meritório (concedida 

quatro vezes), a Medalha de Comenda de Serviço Conjunto, a Medalha de Comenda do Exército (concedida cinco 

vezes), a Medalha de Desempenho do Exército (concedida duas vezes), a Medalha de Boa Conduta do Exército 

(concedida três vezes), a Medalha de Campanha do Iraque (com 2 estrelas de bronze), a Medalha de Serviço de Defesa 

da Coreia, a Fita de Serviço no Exterior (4o Numeral), além de outras medalhas e distintivos de serviço. 

CW5 Albelo concluiu os cursos de formação de oficial técnico sênior e intermediário, bem como os cursos básico e 

avançado para oficiais técnicos assistentes de generais. Ela é formada em Administração de Empresas pela Liberty 

University em Lynchburg, Virgínia, e atualmente está cursando um mestrado em Relações Humanas na University of 

Oklahoma. 

Ela é casada com o Oficial Técnico (Reserva) Francisco e juntos têm um filho, Christian.
Exhibit 32.1




Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report of MEMSIC, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Dr. Yang Zhao, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:




1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: April 30, 2012





/S/ YANG ZHAOYang ZhaoPresident and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 34.1**

** **

**Report ofIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

** **

Board of Directors

Capital One Auto Finance, Inc.

 

We have examined management’s assertionincluded in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with ServicingCriteria, that  Capital One Auto Finance,Inc (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for theautomobile loan servicing platform, as of and for the year****endedDecember 31, 2007, and except for criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii),1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(v), 1122(d)(2)(vi),1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi),1122(d)(4)(xii), and 1122(d)(4)(xiii) which the Company has determined are notapplicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the servicingplatform covered by this report.  Referto Appendix A of management’s Report on Assessment of Compliance with ServicingCriteria for the asset-backed securities covered by this servicing platform(the “Platform”).  Management isresponsible for the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertionabout the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria based onour examination.

 

Our examination was conducted inaccordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute ofCertified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in thecircumstances.  Our examination includedtesting of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions andsecurities that comprise the platform, testing of less than all of theservicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether theCompany processed those selected transactions and performed those selectedactivities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, ourprocedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activitiesperformed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Ourprocedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurredeither prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balancesor amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by thisreport for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe thatour examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examinationdoes not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with theservicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, the Company complied, inall material respects, with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria asof and for the year ended December 31, 2007 for the automobile loanservicing platform.

 
| /s/ Ernst &  Young |
|-----------------------------|
|                        |
| March 27, 2008         |
|                        |

----
#### Erastus H. Benn, Respondent, v. Lewis M. Smith and Francis G. Hall, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Exhibit
10.13





CFS
Bancorp, Inc. 2009 Performance-based Cash Incentive Plan





The Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors approved a Performance-based Cash Incentive Plan (Cash Incentive Plan) for key
employees including the Company’s named executive officers (NEOs).  The CashIncentive Plan
provides an opportunity for key employees to earn a cash bonus for 2009
based on the achievement of corporate, business unit, and/or individual
performance objectives at threshold, target or maximum levels, as established by
the Compensation Committee.




If the employee achieves the
applicable performance objectives, the cash bonus earned is expected to be paid
in February 2010.  In addition, to receive a bonus, the employee must
be employed by CFS Bancorp, Inc. or Citizens Financial Bank, or a successor or
assign, on the date the cash bonus is paid.
 The Compensation Committee will have
full power and discretion to (a) select the employees who are eligible to
receive cash bonuses under the Cash Incentive Plan, (b) determine the amounts of
the bonuses to be paid, (c) determine whether the performance objectives have
been achieved by any employee, and (d) construe and interpret this
Plan.
 
 The Cash Incentive Plan may be
amended, modified or terminated at any time in the discretion of the
Compensation Committee.  Neither this Cash Incentive Plan nor a bonus
opportunity under this Plan constitutes an agreement, understanding or
commitment by CFS Bancorp, Inc. or Citizens Financial Bank for continued
employment with respect to any employee.