alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.2

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (Item 1123)

GMAC Mortgage, LLC

RFMSI Series 2007-S2 Trust (the Issuing Entity)

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of GMAC Mortgage, LLC, as servicer (the Servicer) pursuant to the applicable servicing agreement, does hereby certify that:

1. A review of the Servicers activities during the period covered by the Issuing Entitys report on Form 10-K and of the Servicers performance under the applicable servicing agreement has been made
under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable
servicing agreement in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 24th day
of March 2008.



|       |  |                         
|------ |  | ------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Anthony N. Renzi    
|Name:  |  | Anthony N. Renzi        
|Title: |  | Executive Vice President
#### Henry Riddle, Appellant, v. Henry Saunders, Respondent.

Judgment of County Court reversed; that of Justice’s Court affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Learned, P. J.;

Bockes, J., dissenting.
#### William P. Butler and another v. Byron Pond, Impleaded, etc.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report of Casey Container, Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Martin R Nason,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Martin R Nason
------------------------------------
Martin R Nason
Chief Executive Officer
March 29, 2013

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5597 

To prohibit the Federal Government from issuing or enforcing certain 

requirements for schools relating to food. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 

Mr. GOHMERT (for himself, Mr. HARRIS, Mrs. BACHMANN, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. MARCHANT, Mr. STOCKMAN, Mr. ROGERS of Alabama, Mr. 

ROE of Tennessee, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. BRIDENSTINE, Mr. YOHO, Mr. 

LANKFORD, Mr. BROOKS of Alabama, Mr. DUNCAN of South Carolina, 

and Mr. MCHENRY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Federal Government from issuing or 

enforcing certain requirements for schools relating to food. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as— 

5 (1) the ‘‘Eliminate Dogmatic Interference by 

6 Bureaucratic Lunch Extremists Act’’; or 

7 (2) the ‘‘EDIBLE Act’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5597 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS FOR 

2 SCHOOLS RELATING TO FOOD. 

3 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Fed4 eral Government shall not issue or enforce any require5 ments for elementary schools or secondary schools (as 

6 such terms are defined in section 9101 of the Elementary 

7 and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801)) 

8 with respect to food for which there is or will be a cost 

9 not covered by the Federal Government. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Number 133**SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION**September 1992**Office of the Chief Actuary
 
AVERAGE WAGES FOR 1985-90 FOR INDEXING UNDER THE********
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 239 (Wednesday, December 13, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 64100]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30518]

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

Notice of Agency Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 3:07 p.m. on 
Thursday, December 7, 1995, the Board of Directors of the Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation met in closed session to consider the 
following:

    Personnel matters.
    Matters relating to the Corporation's corporate and supervisory 
activities.
    Recommendation regarding an administrative enforcement 
proceeding.

    In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Vice 
Chairman Andrew C. Hove, Jr., seconded by Director Jonathan L. Fiechter 
(Acting Director, Office of Thrift Supervision), concurred in by 
Director Eugene A. Ludwig (Comptroller of the Currency), and Chairman 
Ricki Helfer, that Corporation business required its consideration of 
the matters on less than seven days' notice to the public; that no 
earlier notice of the meeting was practicable; that the public interest 
did not require consideration of the matters in a meeting open to 
public observation; and that the matters could be considered in a 
closed meeting by authority of subsections (c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), 
(c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B), and (c)(10) of the ``Government in 
the Sunshine Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), 
(c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B), and (c)(10)).
    The meeting was held in the Board Room of the FDIC Building located 
at 550--17th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.

    Dated: December 8, 1995.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,

Deputy Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95-30518 Filed 12-11-95; 3:14 pm]

BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 235 (Thursday, December 7, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 62839]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-29796]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-51-000]


Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

December 1, 1995.
    Take notice that on November 28, 1995, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line 
Company (Panhandle) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
First Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed on Appendix A to 
the filing, to become effective January 1, 1996.
    Panhandle states that the purpose of this filing, made in 
accordance with the provisions of Section 154.202 of the Commission's 
Regulations, is to implement Rate Schedule GPS for Gas Parking Service 
on Panhandle's system pursuant to Panhandle's blanket authority under 
Part 284 of the Commission's Regulations to supplement existing 
services provided under Panhandle's Rate Schedules FT, EFT, SCT, IT, 
EIT, IOS, IIOS, WS, PS, IWS, FS, GDS and TBS.
    Panhandle states that it is proposing to make this service 
available to satisfy the requirements of shippers whose circumstances 
warrant the deferral for a brief time of the delivery of gas received 
and who desire to avoid imbalance penalties. At the present time 
Panhandle does not offer a Parking service.
    Panhandle states that it has gained experience operating its system 
under Order No. 636 and believes there is a need in the marketplace for 
this Parking service. The proposed service under Rate Schedule GPS will 
facilitate the temporary needs of shippers serving markets on 
Panhandle's system and will assist in managing supply for producers, 
aggregators and pooling shippers.
    Panhandle states that copies of this filing are being served on all 
customers subject to the tariff sheets and all interested state 
regulatory agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Secs. 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. Pursuant to Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
regulations, all such motions or protests must be filed not later than 
12 days after the date of the filing noted above. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-29796 Filed 12-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### E. M. ROLLINS v. S. B. ROGERS et al., Commissioners.

(Filed 8 March, 1933.)

Mandamus A b: Schools D Í — Mandamus to compel payment of additional salary to county school superintendent held error in this case.

Mandamus will lie only to compel performance of a legal duty by a party having a clear legal right to demand performance, and the writ is erroneously granted on petition of a county superintendent to compel the levy of taxes for the payment of an additional salary to him as superintendent of a special-charter school district where the matter is in dispute between the hoard of county commissioners and the county board of education, and the boards have not had a joint meeting nor the clerk of the Superior Court called upon to arbitrate the matter. 3 C. S., 5608.

Appeal by defendants from *Harris, J.,*at October Term, 1932, of YaNce.

Application for writ of mandamus, heard upon demurrer.

Plaintiff is superintendent of public instruction for Yance County. He alleges that he was also elected superintendent of the schools of Henderson Township, special-charter district, for a term beginning 1 July, 1932, and ending 30 June, 1933, at a salary of $600 in addition to his salary as county superintendent. When the school budgets were presented to the defendant board of county commissioners, they declined to approve the item of $600, here in dispute, on the ground that the county was already paying the plaintiff for his full time.

There was no joint meeting of the county board of education and the board of county commissioners in an effort to adjust the difference between them, nor was the clerk of the Superior Court called upon to arbitrate the matter as provided by 3 C. S., 5608.

Plaintiff’s application for mandamus to compel the defendants to levy sufficient tax to cover the salary item in dispute was allowed, from which ruling the defendants appeal.

*309
      *J. H. Bridgers and J asper B. Hides for plaintiff.*

*A. A. Bunn and Kittrell & Kittrell for defendants.*

Stacy, O. J.

Mandamus is available against a board of county commissioners only to compel tbe board to do something which it is its duty to do without it. The writ confers no new authority. The party seeking it must have a clear legal right to demand it, and the board must be under a legal obligation to perform the act sought to be enforced. Neither of these prerequisites has been shown in the instant case. *Powers v. Asheville,*203 N. C., 2, 164 S. E., 324; *Person v. Doughton,*186 N. C., 723, 120 S. E., 481. The writ was improvidently granted.

Reversed.
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18
                           OF THE UNITED STATES CODE,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of YSEEK,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period  ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Weintraub, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13 (a) or
          15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

________________________________
David Weintraub
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
May _____, 2003
#### MRS. BERTIE STUBBS, Administratrix of the Estate of ROBERT W. STUBBS, Deceased, v. CHICAGO MILL AND LUMBER CORPORATION, WILTS NATIONAL VENEER CORPORATION, W. EBNER, and D. C. BOYD.

(Filed 17 September, 1930.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *Nunn, J.,*at New Bern, North Carolina, 29 July, 1930. From WASHINGTON.

Affirmed.

IF. *L. Whitley for plaintiff.*

*Zeb Yance N.orman and MacLean & Rodman for defendants.*

Pee Cuelam.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed on the authority of *Wright v. Utility Co.,*198 N. C., 204.

Affirmed.
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="pdf:PDFVersion" content="1.2">
<meta name="xmp:CreatorTool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="pdf:hasXFA" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:modify_annotations" content="true">
<meta name="dc:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="dcterms:created" content="1998-09-15T11:24:07Z">
<meta name="dcterms:modified" content="1998-09-15T11:24:08Z">
<meta name="dc:format" content="application/pdf; version=1.2">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator_tool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="access_permission:fill_in_form" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:modified" content="1998-09-15T11:24:08Z">
<meta name="pdf:hasCollection" content="false">
<meta name="pdf:encrypted" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="12622">
<meta name="pdf:hasMarkedContent" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="application/pdf">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print_faithful" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="pdf:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_for_accessibility" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:assemble_document" content="true">
<meta name="xmpTPg:NPages" content="1">
<meta name="pdf:hasXMP" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_content" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print" content="true">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser">
<meta name="access_permission:can_modify" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:created" content="1998-09-15T11:24:07Z">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div class="page"><p></p>
<p>OPINION t O-7506 WAS NEVER ISSUED OK 
</p>
<p>WAS WITHDRAWN. </p>
<p></p>
</div>
</body></html>
#### *Surety Corp. v. Sharpe.*

Appeal by defendants from *Phillips, J.,*26 May, 1951, at chambers in Rockingham. Motion to dismiss under Rule 17 (1) allowed. 7 June, 1951.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 243 (Tuesday, December 19, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 65244]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30757]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 90-468; RM-7380]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Wickenburg and Lake Havasu City, AZ

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; petition for reconsideration.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This documents grants a Petition for Reconsideration filed by 
Interstate Broadcasting System of Arizona, Inc., licensee of Station 
KRDS-FM, Channel 287C2, Wickenburg, Arizona, directed to the Report and 
Order in this proceeding which had upgraded the Station KRDS-FM license 
to specify operation on Channel 287C1. See 56 FR 43884, September 5, 
1991. With this action, the proceeding is terminated.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 26, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Hayne, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 
776-1654.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Memorandum Opinion and Order in MM Docket No. 90- 468, adopted December 
6, 1995, and released December 12, 1995. The full text of this decision 
is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., Washington, 
DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, 
Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1919 M Street, NW., Room 246, or 2100 M Street, 
NW., Suite 140, Washington, DC 20037.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: Secs. 303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1082; 47 U.S.C. 154, 
as amended.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Arizona, is 
amended by removing Channel 287C1 and adding Channel 287C2 at 
Wickenburg.

Federal Communications Commission.
Douglas W. Webbink,
Chief, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 95-30757 Filed 12-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 15

- 00268

- CV

LEONARD MCGOWAN , Appellant

v.

RICKY AND WENDY HEGE FELD , Appellee

From the 82nd District Court Falls County, Texas Trial Court No. CV38831

O R D E R

This appeal was referred to mediation by order of this Court on January 28, 2016.

Mediation was to take place within 30 days from the date the Court was notified of the

parties’ agreement on a mediator. We were notified that the parties agreed on a mediator

on February 10, 2016 and were informed that mediation was scheduled for March 11,

2016. We have now been informed that med iation has been rescheduled for April 22,

2016.McGowan v. He gefeld Page 2

Accordingly, the time to conduct mediation is extended until April 29, 2016.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Order issued and filed April 14, 2016
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 235 (Thursday, December 7, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 62925]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-29980]





                Sunshine Act Meetings



Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 235 / Thursday, December 7, 1995 / 
Sunshine Act Meetings



[[Page 62925]]




BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS

DATE AND TIME: December 13, 1995; 9:00 a.m.

PLACE: Cohen Building, 330 Independence Avenue, S.W., Room 3360, 
Washington, D.C. 20547.

CLOSED MEETING: The members of the Broadcasting Board of Governors 
(BBG) will meet in closed session to address internal procedural 
issues, as well as sensitive foreign policy and personnel issues 
relating to potential options in the U.S. international broadcasting 
field. This meeting is closed because if open it likely would either 
disclose matters that would be properly classified to be kept secret in 
the interest of foreign policy under the appropriate executive order (5 
U.S.C. 552b. (c) (1)) or would disclose information the premature 
disclosure of which would be likely to significantly frustrate 
implementation of a proposed agency action. (5 U.S.C) 552b. (c)(9) 
(B)). In addition, part of the discussion will relate solely to the 
internal personnel rules and practices, and personnel, of the BBG, the 
International Broadcasting Bureau, and USIA. (5 U.S.C. 552b. (c) (2) 
and (6).

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Persons interested in obtaining 
more information should contact Barbara Floyd at (202) 401-3736.

    Dated: December 5, 1995.
David W Burke.

Chairman.

[FR Doc. 95-29980 Filed 12-5-95; 1:35 pm]

BILLING CODE 6155-01-M
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Glade M. Knight, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Apple REIT Eight, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date: March 5, 2010

/s/ GLADE M. KNIGHT Glade M. Knight
Chief Executive Officer
APPLE REIT EIGHT, Inc.


---



QuickLinks
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 14, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00687

- CV

INTEREST OF J.A.R.,

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County , Texas

Trial Court No. 2017

- PA

- 01303 Honorable Peter A. Sakai, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of a September 13, 2018 order terminating the parental rights of appellant. The appeal must be disposed of by this court within 180 days from the date notice of appeal was filed. T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN

. 6.2. The appellant’s not ice of appeal was filed in the trial court on September 24, 2018. The appellate record was complete on October 15, 2018, making the original due date for the appellant’s brief November 5, 2018. Appellant requested and received one extension of twenty day s, extending the deadline for the appellant’s brief to November 26, 2018. As of this date, neither the appellant’s brief nor a motion for extension of time has been filed. It is therefore ORDERED that appellant show cause in writing within ten (10) days from the date of this order why her appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 28.4( a)(1)

, 38.8(a)(1).

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Jus tice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 14th day of December, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTL E

, Clerk of Court