alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO            SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934: RULES 13a-14, 13a-15, 15d-14, and 15d-15            SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** ** I,Robert “Steve” Owens, certify that:

·     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Ring Energy, Inc.;

·     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which            such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

·     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows            of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

·     I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

·     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,            including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

·     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the            end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

·     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth            fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

·     I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of            directors:

·     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to            record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

·     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:December 30, 2008     

 

By/s/Robert “Steve” Owens

Robert “Steve” Owens,            Chief Executive Officer
#### Jerome B. Moore and others v. Charles Demong and others.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to abide event.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6568

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ANDRE WILLIAMS, a/k/a Andre Curry, a/k/a Drey, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. William M. Kidd, Senior District Judge. (CR-93-48, CA-97-137) Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: October 26, 1998 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Andre Williams, Appellant Pro Se. William David Wilmoth, United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia; Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Andre Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Williams , Nos. CR-93-48; CA-97-137 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 30, 1998). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Norman L. Hubbard, Respondent, v. The Long Island Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Dykman, J.
```

[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 236 (Friday, December 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63059-63060]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-29975]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 63060]]

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-31,267 and 267A]

Woolrich, Incorporated, Alliance, NE; and Woolrich, Incorporated, 
Ailey, GA; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 
Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on August 10, 1995, applicable 
to all workers of Woolrich, Incorporated located in Alliance, Nebraska. 
The notice was published in the Federal Register on August 24, 1995 (60 
FR 44079).
    The Department reviewed the certification for workers at the 
subject firm. New information received from the company shows that 
worker separations will occur at Woolrich's Ailey, Georgia sewing 
facility. The workers produce ladies' and men's outerwear and 
sportswear. Based on this new information, the Department is amending 
the certification to cover workers of the subject firm in Ailey, 
Georgia.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Woolrich, Incorporated who were adversely affected by 
increased imports of apparel.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-31,267 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of Woolrich, Incorporated, Alliance, Nebraska (TA-
W-31,267), and Ailey, Georgia (TA-W-31,267A) who became totally or 
partially separated from employment on or after July 12, 1994 are 
eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the 
Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 27th day of November 1995.
Russell T. Kile,
Acting Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-29975 Filed 12-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
```
#### FLOYD A. FISHER, Administrator, v. TOWN OF WAYNESVILLE.

(Filed 20 September, 1939.)

Appeal by defendant from *Alley, J.,*at May Term, 1989, of Haywood.

Civil action to recover damages for death of plaintiff’s intestate alleged to have been caused by the wrongful act, neglect or default of the defendant.

Upon denial of liability, the case was tried upon- the usual issues of negligence, contributory negligence and damages, and resulted in a verdict and judgment for plaintiff.

Defendant appeals, assigning errors.

*Grover C. Davis and Sale, Pennell & Pennell for plaintiff, appellee.*

*Morgan & Ward and F. E. Alley, Jr., for defendant, appellant.*

Per Curiam.

The exceptions to the admission and exclusion of evidence, the rulings on the motions to nonsuit, and the assignments of error directed to portions of the charge apparently present no new question of law or one not heretofore settled by a number of decisions. Our impression is that no serious harm has come to the defendant in the-particulars pointed out by its exceptions. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 553 

To designate the exclusive economic zone of the United States as the ‘‘Ronald 

Wilson Reagan Exclusive Economic Zone of the United States’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2013 

Mr. ISSA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To designate the exclusive economic zone of the United 

States as the ‘‘Ronald Wilson Reagan Exclusive Economic Zone of the United States’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF THE RONALD WILSON 

4 REAGAN EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE OF 

5 THE UNITED STATES. 

6 (a) DESIGNATION.—The exclusive economic zone of 

7 the United States, as established by Presidential Procla8 mation Numbered 5030, dated March 10, 1983, is des9 ignated as the ‘‘Ronald Wilson Reagan Exclusive Eco10 nomic Zone of the United States’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 553 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the exclusive economic zone of the United States 

4 is deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Ronald Wilson Reagan 

5 Exclusive Economic Zone of the United States’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350   In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-Q of Mod Hospitality, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ending September 30, 2009, I, Dilli Prasad Thapaliya, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:  1.    Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Dated: November 13, 2009By:/s/ DILLI PRASAD THAPALIYADilli Prasad ThapaliyaChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4221 Filed: 10/16/19 Entered: 10/16/19 11:12:40 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4221 Filed: 10/16/19 Entered: 10/16/19 11:12:40 Page 2 of

2
#### STATE v. HALLIE PARTRIDGE.

(Filed 10 December, 1958.)

Appeal by defendant from *Hall, J.,*March Criminal Term 1958 of Lee.

This defendant was tried and convicted in the County Criminal Court of Lee County upon a warrant charging that on 30 December 1957 the defendant did unlawfully have in her possession a quantity of alcoholic beverage and intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale, to wit, 12 pints of taxpaid whiskey, 4 pints of vodka, 1 quart of vodka, and 23 cans of beer. From the verdict and judgment the defendant appealed to the Superior Court of Lee County.

The defendant was tried in the Superior Court upon the original warrant. She entered a plea of not guilty. From .the evidence offered by the State the jury returned a verdict of guilty. The court imposed a sentence of 7 months in State Prison in quarters provided for women as authorized by G.S. 148-27.

The defendant appeals, assigning error.

*Attorney General Seawell, Ass’t. Attorney General Bruton, for the State.*

*Pittman & Staton, Lowry M. Betts for defendant.*

PER Cueiam.

The defendant appeals only from the refusal of the court below to grant her motion for judgment as of nonsuit.

We have carefully considered the evidence adduced in the trial below and in our opinion it ivas sufficient to carry the case to the jury. Therefore, the ruling of the court below on the motion for judgment as of nonsuit will be upheld.

Affirmed.

PARKER, J., not sitting.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

# ACTION:

Notice of Meeting

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C., App. 2, the Commission on Care gives notice that it will meet on Tuesday, February 9, 2016, at the American Legion National Headquarters Office, 1608 K Street NW., 7th Floor Conference Room, Washington, DC, 20006. The meeting will convene at 8:30 a.m. and end no later than 5:30 p.m. This meeting notice is being provided with less than 15 calendar days of notice due to inclement weather, which delayed the meeting's final confirmation. The meeting is open to the public.

The purpose of the Commission, as described in section 202 of the Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability Act of 2014, is to examine the access of veterans to health care from the Department of Veterans Affairs and strategically examine how best to organize the Veterans Health Administration, locate health care resources, and deliver health care to veterans during the next 20 years.

                    No time will be allocated at this meeting for receiving oral presentations from the public. The public may submit written statements for the Commission's review to                     *commissiononcare@va.gov*. Due to building security requirements, any member of the public wanting to attend must register their intention by emailing the Designated Federal Officer, John Goodrich, at                     *john.goodrich@va.gov,*                     no later than 5:00 p.m. on Friday, February 5, 2016.                

Dated: January 28, 2016.

John Goodrich,

Designated Federal Officer, Commission on Care.

[FR Doc. 2016-01829 Filed 2-1-16; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
## Linebar ger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP 4828 Loop Central Drive, Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77081

Main: 713

- 844

- 3400
August 4, 2015

Via E- File

The Honorable Christopher A. Prine, Clerk Fourteenth Court of Appeals 301 Fannin Street , Suite 245 Houston, Texas 77002-2006

Re: Designation of Lead Counsel in Case No. 14-15-00642- CV; Albert R obinson, et al. v. Harris County, et al ; In the Fourteenth Court of Appeals, Trial Court Cause No. 2014-49892.
Please be advised that I represent and serve as lead counse l for Harris County, Harris County Department of Education, Port of Houston Authority of Harris County, Harris County Flood Control District, Harris County Hospi tal District, and the City of Houston, (the “Harris County Appellees”). Accordingly, please change the record to reflect this designation and add the following contact information to your records:
Edward J. (Nick) Nicholas Texas Bar No. 14991350 Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP 4828 Loop Central Drive, Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77081 Direct: 713 -844-3405 Facsimile: 713 -844-3504 E-Mail: Nick.Nicholas@lgbs.com
Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Please contact me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,

Nick Nicholas

cc: Mr. Albert Robinson PO Box 495-672 Port Charlotte, FL 33949 ACCEPTED 14-15-00642-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 8/4/2015 7:27:58 AM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 240 (Thursday, December 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64158-64159]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30487]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE


Office of the Secretary of Defense Meeting of the DOD Advisory 
Group on Electron Devices

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Advisory Group on Electron Devices.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Working Group B (Microelectronics) of the DoD Advisory 

[[Page 64159]]
Group on Electron Devices (AGED) announces a closed session meeting.

DATE: The meeting will be held at 0900, Thursday, 14 December 1995.

ADDRESS: The meeting will be held at Palisades Institute for Research 
Services, 1745 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22202.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Warner Kramer, AGED Secretariat, 1745 Jefferson Davis Highway, Crystal 
Square Four, Suite 500, Arlington, Virginia 22202.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The mission of the Advisory Group is to 
provide advice to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Technology, to the Director Defense Research and Engineering (DDR&E), 
to the Director Advanced Research Projects Agency and the Military 
Departments in planning and managing an effective research and 
development program in the field of electron devices.
    The Working Group B meeting will be limited to review of research 
and development program which the military proposes to initiate with 
industry, universities or in the laboratories. The microelectronics 
area includes such programs on semiconductor materials, integrated 
circuits, charge coupled devices and memories. The review will include 
classified program details throughout.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of Pub. L. No. 92-463, as amended, 
(5 U.S.C. App. IISec. 10(d) (1988)), it has been determined that this 
Advisory Group meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 
Sec. 552b(c)(1)(1988)), and that accordingly, this meeting will be 
closed to the public.

    Dated: December 11, 1995.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 95-30487 Filed 12-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 238 (Tuesday, December 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 63706]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30193]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-64-000]


South Georgia Natural Gas Company; Notice of Revised Tariff 
Sheets

December 6, 1995.
    Take notice that on November 30, 1995, South Georgia Natural Gas 
Company (South Georgia) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet, to 
become effective January 1, 1996:


Second Revised Sheet No. 5
Second Revised Sheet No. 6


    South Georgia sets forth in the filing the deferred costs of its 
post employment benefits (other than pensions) (``PBOPs'') incurred 
since January 1, 1993. These costs have arisen as a result of South 
Georgia's adoption of the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 
No. 106, Employers Accounting for Post-Retirement Benefits Other Than 
Pensions (SFAS 106).
    Copies of the filing were served upon South Georgia's customers and 
interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with 18 CFR 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. Pursuant to Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
regulations, all such motions or protests must be filed not later than 
12 days after the date of the filing noted above. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of South Georgia's filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-30193 Filed 12-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Travelport Limited (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ended
December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Jeff Clarke, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael E. Rescoe, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
of his knowledge:



|                                                                                    |  |  |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 
|/s/  Jeff Clarke JEFF CLARKE
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER September 26, 2008             |  |  |  | 
|/s/  Michael E. Rescoe MICHAEL E. RESCOE
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER September 26, 2008 |  |  |  | 

---



QuickLinks
NO. 07-10-0454-CV 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

AT AMARILLO 

PANEL A 

DECEMBER 16, 2010 

______________________________ 

KANDY GILBERT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS INDEPENDENT EXECUTRIX 

OF THE ESTATE OF ELIZABETH MOORE, APPELLANT 

V. 

RONALD E. MOORE, AS INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR 

OF THE ESTATE OF OATHER WINFIELD MOORE, APPELLEE 

_________________________________ 

FROM THE 286TH DISTRICT COURT OF HOCKLEY COUNTY; 

NO. 09-12-21987; HONORABLE PAT PHELAN, JUDGE 

_______________________________ 

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Pending before this Court is Appellant=s Motion to Dismiss Appeal in which she 

requests that this appeal be dismissed. Without passing on the merits of the case, the 

motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). Having 

dismissed the appeal at Appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained 

and our mandate will issue forthwith. 

 Patrick A. Pirtle 

 Justice
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lionbridge Technologies, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Rory J. Cowan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Donald M. Muir, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 11, 2008



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ RORY J. COWAN      
|Rory J. Cowan          
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|/s/ DONALD M. MUIR     
|Donald M. Muir         
|Chief Financial Officer



1