alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

Search
Search

Search
                    - 
                    - 
                    - 
                    - 
                    - 

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission             
  -  Warfighting Units             
  -  Frequently Asked Questions             
  -  Strategic Vision             
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander             
  -  Deputy Commander             
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader             
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General             
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request             
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator             
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate             
  -  Command Chaplain             
  -  Commandant             
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos             
  -  Speeches             
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest             
    -  AEE Members 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians             
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information             
  -  Checking In 

United States Space Command Fact Sheet

United States Space Command Fact Sheet

United States Space Command Fact Sheet

##### U.S. Space Command Public Affairs:719-554-3478

 

#### **QUICK LINKS**

#### Accessibility  |  Section 508    Web PolicySite Map  |  Defense.gov  |  Intel.govQuestions  |  Privacy and SecurityContact Us  |  Inspector General  |  FOIAOPM.gov  |  Plain Writing Act | MISONo Fear Act  |  Links DisclaimerUSA.gov  |  DoD Open Government

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
##  Social Security Increases - COLA & Wage-indexed Amounts

- Office of the Chief Actuary
- Summary table
- Average Wage Index
- Cost-Of-Living Adjustment

average wage indexcost-of-living adjustmentwage-indexed amountssummarized in a table

initial benefit computationswage-indexed amounts

*Federal Register*

        -  Automatic increases affect  OASDI benefits Retirement benefit examples
 are given for people      with earnings of at least the 
maximum-taxable level
 since age 22
Maximum Federal Supplementary Security Income (SSI)
      amounts are based on COLAs
Taxable maximum
 for a year is the maximum earnings     subject to the 
Social Security tax
Payment Calculation Bases
 are used to set payments to       providers of rehabilitation services
Footer menu
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# PHOTOS ANDVIDEOS

Search

Search

                                - All Images 
                                - Other 
                                - Space Shuttle 

                                - Upload Date
                                - Photo Date
                                - Title

----

Download Image: Full Size (1.88 MB)

Tags:USSPACECOM, Uruguay

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1290
DELZOLA M. CUFFEE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus TIDEWATER COMMUNITY COLLEGE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter D. Kelley, Jr., District Judge. (2:04-cv-00381-WDK) Submitted: July 21, 2006 Decided: August 9, 2006 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Delzola M. Cuffee, Appellant Pro Se. Martha Murphey Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Delzola M. Cuffee, an African American female, appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to her employer in her civil action in which she alleged discrimination and retaliation claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cuffee v. Tidewater Cmty. Coll. , No. 2:04-cv00381-WDK (E.D. Va. Jan. 17, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            5                  
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1000
       
<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-06-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-06-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   98,926
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    294,325
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               429,564
<PP&E>                                         275,473
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,127,986
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          218,422
<BONDS>                                        796,877
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           677
<OTHER-SE>                                     104,239
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,127,986
<SALES>                                      1,417,746
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,417,746
<CGS>                                          896,539
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  896,539
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,608
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                146,729
<INCOME-TAX>                                    55,752
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             90,977
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    90,977
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.18
        

                                                   

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form S-8 No. 33-86314 pertaining to the CompSavings Plan for Employees of
CompUSA Inc., Form S-8 No. 33-99280 pertaining to the CompUSA Inc. Deferred
Compensation Plan, Forms S-8 No. 33-45339, No. 33-72718, No. 33-99282, and No.
333-18033 pertaining to the Long-Term Incentive Plan, and Form S-8 No. 333-06235
pertaining to the PCs Compleat, Inc. 1991 Stock Option Plan, of our report dated
August 20, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of CompUSA Inc. included in this Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
June 26, 1999.

                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

                                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Dallas, Texas
September 10, 1999
DENIED; Opinion Filed October 28, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-19-00792-CV

IN RE ROGER BARONE, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 380th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 380-50207-2019

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Bridges, Osborne, and Carlyle

Opinion by Justice Carlyle

Before the Court is relator’s July 2, 2019 petition for writ of mandamus and real party in 

interest’s September 3, 2019 reply. In his petition, relator requests this Court to set aside the trial 

court’s February 11, 2019 temporary orders and vacate the trial court’s May 29, 2019 contempt 

order. To be entitled to mandamus relief, relator must show both that the trial court has clearly 

abused its discretion and that relators have no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. 

Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). After reviewing the petition, 

mandamus record, and response, we conclude relator has failed to show he is entitled to the relief 

requested.

Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a) 

(the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief 
–2–

sought).

190792F.P05

/Cory L. Carlyle/

CORY L. CARLYLE

JUSTICE
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 17 (Wednesday, January 27, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 4618]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-01640]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Agency Information Collection Extension

AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE), pursuant to the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995, intends to extend for three years, an 
information collection request with the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB). Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the extended collection of 
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of 
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical 
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the 
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the 
methodology and assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance the quality, 
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways 
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, 
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other 
forms of information technology.

DATES: Comments regarding this proposed information collection must be 
received on or before March 28, 2016. If you anticipate difficulty in 
submitting comments within that period, contact the person listed below 
as soon as possible.

ADDRESSES: Written comments may be sent to Eric Mulch at 1000 
Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20585 or by email at 
[email protected].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric F. Mulch, Attorney-Adviser, at 
(202) 287-5746, or via email at [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This information collection request 
contains: (1) OMB No. 1910-5115; (2) Information Collection Request 
Title: Contractor Legal Management Requirements; (3) Type of Review: 
extension; (4) Purpose: the information collection to be extended has 
been and will be used to form the basis for DOE actions on requests 
from the contractors for reimbursement of litigation and other legal 
expenses. The information collected related to annual legal budget, 
staffing and resource plans, and initiation or settlement of defensive 
or offensive litigation is and will be similarly used; (5) Annual 
Estimated Number of Respondents: 45; (6) Annual Estimated Number of 
Total Responses: 154; (7) Annual Estimated Number of Burden Hours: 
1150; (8) Annual Estimated Reporting and Recordkeeping Cost Burden: 0.

    Statutory Authority: Section 161 of the Atomic Energy Act of 
1954, 42 U.S.C. 2201, the Department of Energy Organization Act, 42 
U.S.C 7101, et seq., and the National Nuclear Security 
Administration Act, 50 U.S.C. 2401, et seq.

    Issued in Washington, DC on Janaury 20, 2016.
Steven Croley,
General Counsel, United States Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2016-01640 Filed 1-26-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
MPD IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. OP 20 - 0 553 JASON ROOD ,

Petitioner , v. VANCE LAUGHLIN, Warden,

Respondent. **ORDER** Upon consideration of Respondent ’s motion for a 3 0 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent is granted an extension of time to and including January 22, 2021 , within which to prepare, serve, and file his response.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 18 2020

12/18/2020

Case Number: OP 20-0553
#### R. H. CLARK et al. v. SAPHRONIA HENDERSON et al.

(Filed 19 December, 1930.)

Appeal and Efrror P a — In order for matter to be considered on appeal it must be presented by assignment of error.

Matter discussed in appellant’s brief must be presented by assignment of error to be considered on appeal.

Appeal by plaintiffs from *MacRae, Special Judge,*presiding at March Term, 1930, of MadisoN.

No error.

This is an action to recover possession of land upon the allegation in the complaint that plaintiffs are the owners and entitled to the possession of the land described therein. This allegation is denied by defendants in their answer.

The first issue submitted to the jury was answered as follows:

“1. Are the plaintiffs the owners and entitled to the possession of the land described in the complaint? Answer: No.”

From judgment on the verdict that plaintiffs are not the owners, and are not entitled to recover possession of the land described in the complaint, plaintiffs appealed to the Supreme Court.

*J. Coleman Ramsay and J ohn II. McElroy for plaintiffs.*

*J ohn A. H&ndmclcs and Guy V. Roberts for defendants.*

Pee Cueiam.

The only assignment of error set out in the transcript filed in this Court on plaintiffs’ appeal, is based on their exception to the judgment. There is no error in the judgment. It is supported by the verdict.

The contention of plaintiffs that there was error in the instruction of the court to the jury with respect to the first issue, although discussed in the brief filed for plaintiffs in this Court, cannot be considered for the reason that this contention is not presented by an assignment of error made as required by the rules of this Court. See Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 192 N. C., 839. Rule 19, sec. 3.

No error.
733 A.2d 492

#### RASHEED SYED, ETC., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-PETITIONERS, v. METROPOLITAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

April 30, 1999.

Petition for certification is granted, the judgment of the Appellate Division is summarily reversed, and the June 3,1997, order of the Law Division barring Richard Berman, M.D., from testifying and the June 23, 1997, order of the Law Division dismissing the within complaint are vacated; and it is further

ORDERED that the within matter is remanded to the Law Division for further proceedings consistent with this Order.
#### The Davidson Steam Pump Company, Respondent, v. Village of Catskill, Appellant.

Order refusing to change place of trial affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Opinion by

Dykman, J.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 8, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 7488]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3103]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
26 CFR Part 1

[EE-41-86]
RIN 1545-AI52


Exempt Organizations Not Required To File Annual Returns: 
Integrated Auxiliaries; Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Correction to notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to the notice of proposed 
rulemaking [EE-41-86], which was published in the Federal Register for 
Thursday, December 15, 1994 (59 FR 64633). The proposed rulemaking 
relates to regulations that exempt certain tax-exempt organizations 
from filing information returns.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Terri Harris or Paul Accettura, (202) 
622-6070 (not a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The proposed regulations that are the subject of this correction 
are under section 6033 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Need for Correction

    As published, the notice of proposed rulemaking contains a 
typographical error that is in need of correction.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication of the notice of proposed rulemaking 
which is the subject of FR Doc. 94-30587, is corrected as follows:
    On page 64634, Sec. 1.6033-2, column 3, the section heading of 
Sec. 1.6033-2 is corrected as follows:


``Sec. 1.6033-2  Returns by exempt organizations (taxable years 
beginning after December 31, 1969) and returns by certain nonexempt 
organizations (taxable years beginning after December 31, 1980).''.

Cynthia E. Grigsby,
Chief, Regulations Unit, Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate).
[FR Doc. 95-3103 Filed 2-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 244 (Wednesday, December 20, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 65568-65569]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30780]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Fiscal Service

31 CFR Part 390


Collection By Administrative Offset

AGENCY: Bureau of the Public Debt, Fiscal Service, Department of the 
Treasury.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This final rule amends Title 31 by removing Part 390. The 
action is being taken because the Treasury Department's promulgation of 
administrative offset regulations at 31 CFR Part 5, Subpart D, made 
Part 390 unnecessary.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 20, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ed Gronseth, Deputy Chief Counsel, 
Bureau of the Public Debt, Parkersburg, WV (304) 480-5187.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Part 390 applied to the collection of claims by administrative 
offset by the Bureau of the Public Debt. The rule was needed to 
implement the administrative offset provisions of section 10 of the 
Debt Collection Act of 1982, (31 U.S.C. 3716). Subsequent to the 
adoption of this rule, the Department of the Treasury promulgated 
Department-wide 

[[Page 65569]]
administrative offset regulations at 31 CFR Part 5, Subpart D.

Procedural Requirements

    This final rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' pursuant 
to Executive Order 12866. This final rule merely removes a redundancy 
from existing Department of the Treasury regulations. Accordingly, 
notice and public procedure thereon is unnecessary. Pursuant to 5 
U.S.C. 553(d)(3), good cause is found for making this rule effective 
upon publication. As no notice of proposed rulemaking is required, the 
provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) do 
not apply. There are no collections of information required by this 
final rule, and, therefore, the Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply.

List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 390

    Administrative practice and procedure, Claims.

    Accordingly, under the authority of 5 U.S.C. 301, 31 CFR chapter II 
is hereby amended by removing part 390.

PART 390--[REMOVED]

    1. Part 390 is removed.

    Dated: December 7, 1995.
Van Zeck,
Acting Commissioner of the Public Debt.
[FR Doc. 95-30780 Filed 12-19-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-39-P
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 325 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                        Calendar No. 40
117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 325

                          [Report No. 117-12]

   To amend the Alyce Spotted Bear and Walter Soboleff Commission on 
 Native Children Act to extend the deadline for a report by the Alyce 
Spotted Bear and Walter Soboleff Commission on Native Children, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 12, 2021

 Ms. Murkowski (for herself, Mr. Schatz, Mr. Sullivan, and Mr. Tester) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                      Committee on Indian Affairs

                             April 14, 2021

               Reported by Mr. Schatz, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Alyce Spotted Bear and Walter Soboleff Commission on 
 Native Children Act to extend the deadline for a report by the Alyce 
Spotted Bear and Walter Soboleff Commission on Native Children, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ALYCE SPOTTED BEAR AND WALTER SOBOLEFF COMMISSION ON NATIVE 
              CHILDREN REPORT.

    Section 3(f) of the Alyce Spotted Bear and Walter Soboleff 
Commission on Native Children Act (Public Law 114-244; 130 Stat. 987) 
is amended, in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking ``3 
years'' and inserting ``5 years''.
                                                        Calendar No. 40

117th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 325

                          [Report No. 117-12]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

   To amend the Alyce Spotted Bear and Walter Soboleff Commission on 
 Native Children Act to extend the deadline for a report by the Alyce 
Spotted Bear and Walter Soboleff Commission on Native Children, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 14, 2021

                       Reported without amendment
```