alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATION****C-BASS 2007-CB1 Trust**I, Elizabeth Folk, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Litton Loan Servicing LP, certify that: 1. I have reviewed the report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of  C-BASS 2007-CB1 Trust (the "Exchange Act Periodic Reports"); 2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports; 4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance review(s) conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the servicer(s) has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all materialrespects; and 5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  The Bank  of New York (custodian) and US Bank National Association (trustee). Date:  March 3, 2008 _/s/ Elizabeth Folk___________________ Elizabeth Folk Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Litton Loan Servicing LP *(Senior Officer in charge of servicing function of the servicer)*
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

PERRY LAMONT WALLACE, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 120 MAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 15th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JOSHUA CRUZADO,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-644

[June 3, 2021]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Bernard I. Bober, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 18-006626-CF-10A.

Patrick Curry, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, GROSS and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
### NUMBER 13 - 17 - 00 319 - C V 

## COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN THE MATTER OF D.M., A CHILD

On a ppeal from the 449 th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.



## ORDER ABATING APPEAL
Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides , and Longoria

Order Per Curiam This is an interlocutory appeal from an order certifying D.M., a juvenile, to stand trial as an adult. See T EX

. F AM

. C ODE A NN

. § 54.02 (West, Westlaw through 2017 1st C.S.). Appeals from orders transferring a child for prosecution as an adult are accelerated and handled in an expedient manner by the appellate courts. See id. § 56.01( c ), (h

- 1) (West, Westlaw through 2017 1st C.S.); see also Order Accelerating Juvenile Certif

ication Appeals and Requiring Juvenile Courts to Give Notice of the Right to An Immediate Appeal , T EXAS S UPREME C OURT , Misc. Docket No. 15

- 91 56 (Tex. 2015),2

http://www.txcourts.gov/media/1055398/159156.pdf (mandating that courts of appeals

ensure , as reasonably possible, that juvenile certification appeals are brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed). Appellant filed his notice of appeal in this case on June 14, 2017. Thus, pursuant to the order iss ued by the Texas Supreme Court, this Court must dispose of this appeal by December 11, 2017. On October 30, 2017, the day appellant’s brief was due to this Court, appellant’s appointed counsel O. Rene Flores filed a motion for e xtension of time to file the appellate brief in this matter , citing other commitments in two pending murder trials in Hidalgo County. His motion for extension of time requested an extension of 90 days , putting the brief’s new due date well

- passed this Court’s 180

- day deadline to dis pose of this appeal. We have a duty to ensure that appellant ’ s rights are protected. Accordingly, we DENY counsel ’ s motion for extension of time and ABATE and REMAND this matter to the trial court with instructions to remove O. Rene Flores as counsel for appellant due to his scheduling conflict , and appoint new appellate counsel in his place for this appeal only

. In exercising its discretion in appointing new counsel, we urge the trial court to take into consideration the time

- sensitive nature of this app eal, as well as the volume of the record. The trial court shall hold a hearing appointing new counsel on or before the expiration of
ten (10) days from the date of this order . In its order appointing new counsel, t he name, address, telephone number, and state bar number of newly appointed counsel shall be included in the order of appointment. Furthermore, t he trial court shall cause its order to be included in a supplemental clerk's record to be filed with the Clerk of this Court within seven days of the new appointment

.3

Appellant ’ s brief will be due within twenty days from the date of the trial court’s order of appointment . The Court will look with disfavor upon any extension of time t o file the brief in this matter. IT IS SO ORDERED. PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed the 31st day of October, 2017

.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit

__________________________ 

SHELIA WINSETT,

Claimant-Appellant,

v.

Eric K. Shinseki, SECRETARY OF VETERANS 

AFFAIRS,

Respondent-Appellee.

__________________________ 

2012-7180

__________________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for 

Veterans Claims in No. 12-784, Judge Alan G. Lance, Sr.

__________________________ 

ON MOTION

__________________________ 

O R D E R

Shelia Winsett submits a document entitled “Motion 

Procedureal Error on Part of Clerk of Court”, which the 

court treats as a motion for various relief.

Upon consideration thereof, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

Case: 12-7180 Document: 26 Page: 1 Filed: 05/10/2013
SHELIA WINSETT V. SHINSEKI 2

The motion is deferred to the merits panel assigned to 

hear this case. 

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

 Jan Horbaly

 Clerk

s21 

Case: 12-7180 Document: 26 Page: 2 Filed: 05/10/2013
#### ALTON G. SADLER v. ALICE McCRAW SADLER.

Appeal by defendant from *Hatch, Special Judge,*June Civil Term, 1950, of Orange.

Motion of plaintiff appellee to dismiss the appeal.

JOHNSON, J.,

for the Court. Motion allowed. Leave granted to appellant to move to reinstate appeal upon completion of record. December 13, 1950.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 24, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00192

- CV

Abelardo G. GONZALEZ

, Appellant

v.

Nicholas LICHTENBERGER ; Judge Jose Antonio Lopez; City of Laredo; Roque Perez;

Chr istina M. Pena; Webb County; Martin Cuellar; Pepe Salinas; Sergio Lozano; and Edward A. Nolen, Appellee s

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CVT003714 D1 Honorable Robert C. Chesire, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was originally due on May 18, 2016 . Appellant is acting pro se on appeal. Because n either the brief nor a motion for extension of time ha d been filed

, this court ordered appellant to file his appellant’s brief no later than June 17, 2016

. Our order cautioned appellant that if he did not file the brief by this date or fail ed to reasonably explain the reason for his failure to do so, this appeal w ould be dismissed for want of prosecution. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a ) ; 42.3(b),(c).

On June 16 , 2016, appellant filed a response to our order in which he requests that the trial court clerk file a supplemental clerk’s record. On June 22, 2016, this court ordered t he

Webb County District Clerk to electronically file a supplemental clerk’s record that contains the following: (1) an amendment to motion to modify judgment filed on or about April 28 , 2016 ; (2) motion for a hearing on motion to modify judgment filed on or about May 23, 2016; and (3) amended notice of appeal

.

The supplemental clerk ’ s record was filed on June 23, 2016. Appellant’s brief is due July 25, 2016. Appellant is cautioned that further requests for extensions of time in which to file his

brief are disco uraged._________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the sai d

court on this 24th day of June, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Home **Our Work **  Grants ** Stream & Watershed Enhancement Grant Program

# Stream & Watershed Enhancement Grant Program

SRBC announced the Stream & Watershed Enhancement Grant Programon August 23, 2023.

SRBC is pleased to announce the launch of a newgrant programto support local organizations dedicated to the health and wellness of ourBasin’s waterways.The Stream & Watershed Enhancement Grant program will provide funding forcommunity-based environmental and water resources projects or events that improve,restore or protect our local watersheds. Please review theStream & Watershed Enhancement Grant Guidelines documentfor eligibility and example projects.

In its first year, the Commission awarded more than $150,000 to 34 projects.

##### Awardees

2023 - Please click here to review the 34 projects awarded grant funding in 2023.

##### Webinar

SRBC hosted an informational webinar on October 3, 2023.View Webinar Video

*The grant window is currently closed and Round 2 will open in late summer. Please check back soon for the schedule!*

######  Key Grant Program Documents

            - Grant Guidelines
            - Coordinate Search & Map
            - Application User Guide
            - Frequently Asked Questions
            - Stream & Watershed Enhancement Grant Funding Agreement

----

##### Grant Program Questions?

Please contact the Commission with any questions regarding the grant program or application technical support:Susquehanna River Basin Commission4423 North Front StreetHarrisburg, PA 17110-1788E-mail: * *[email protected]
100229738.1 0099865-30600

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION

- and -

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY,

Debtors.

Bankruptcy Case

No. 19 - 30088 (DM)

Chapter 11

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

 Affects PG&E Corporation

 Affects Pacific Gas and Electric 

Corporation

 Affects both Debtors

*All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case, 

No. 19-3088 (DM).

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR 

ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY 

DAVID B. LEVANT PRO HAC VICE

David B. Levant, whose business and telephone number is 

David B. Levant

STOEL RIVES LLP

101 S. Capitol Boulevard, Suite 1900

Boise, ID 83702

Telephone: 208.389.9000

and who is an active member in good standing of the bar of the State of Washington having 

applied in the above-entitled action for admission to practice in the Bankruptcy Court for the 

Signed and Filed: February 12, 2019

________________________________________

DENNIS MONTALI

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

Entered on Docket 

February 12, 2019

EDWARD J. EMMONS, CLERK 

U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 417 Filed: 02/12/19 Entered: 02/12/19 16:01:21 Page 1 of 2
100229738.1 0099865-30600

Northern District of California on a pro hac vice basis representing Avangrid Renewables, LLC, 

et al.

1

; Enel Green Power North America, Inc. et al.

2 and Enel X; Capital Dynamics, Inc. et al.3

; 

FTP Power LLC, et al.

4

; and Gill Ranch Storage, LLC.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application of David B. Levant is granted, subject 

to the terms and conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate 

appearance pro hac vice. Service of papers upon and communication with co-counsel designated 

in the application will constitute notice to the represented party. All future filings in this action 

are subject to the Bankruptcy Local Rules and Electronic Case Filing Procedures adopted by the 

United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California.

*** END OF ORDER ***

 1 This representation includes the following subsidiaries of Avangrid Renewables, LLC: Klondike Wind Power III 

LLC and Shiloh I Wind Project LLC.

2 This representation includes the following subsidiaries of Enel Green Power North America, Inc.: Sierra Energy 

Storage, LLC, Kingston Energy Storage, LLC, Cascade Energy Storage, LLC, El Dorado Hydro, LLC and Rock 

Creek Hydro, LLC.

3 This representation includes the following subsidiaries of Capital Dynamics, Inc.: CA Flats Solar 150, LLC, Lost 

Hills Solar, LLC, Blackwell Solar, LLC, Parrey, LLC, and North Star Solar, LLC.

4 This representation includes the following subsidiaries of FTP Power LLC: Western Antelope Blue Sky Ranch A 

LLC, 87RL 8me LLC, Aspiration Solar G LLC, Bayshore Solar A, LLC, Bayshore Solar B, LLC, and Bayshore 

Solar C, LLC.

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 417 Filed: 02/12/19 Entered: 02/12/19 16:01:21 Page 2 of 2
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 21, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 133896(78) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 133896 COA: 265576 Kent CC: 04-006801-FH VICTOR GLEN CRON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s September 10, 2007 order is consider ed, and it is GRANTED. We VACATE our order dated September 10, 2007. On recons ideration, the application for leave to appeal the March 22, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. Pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals
to the extent it affirms the defendant’s co nviction for fourth-degree criminal sexual conduct, we VACATE the de fendant’s conviction and se ntence for fourth-degree criminal sexual conduct, and we REMAND this case to the Kent Circuit Court for resentencing on the defendant’s remaining conv iction. In this case , the jury should not
have been instructed on four th-degree criminal sexual condu ct, because that offense is not a necessarily included lesser offense of second-degree criminal sexual conduct. See People v Nyx , 479 Mich 112 (2007). In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remain ing questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

C ORRIGAN , J., would deny the moti on for reconsideration.

d1218 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 21, 2007

Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 237 (Monday, December 11, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 63574]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30267]








LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION

Provision for the Delivery of Legal Services Committee Meeting

TIME AND DATE: The Legal Services Corporation's Committee on Provision 
for the Delivery of Legal Services will meet on December 17, 1995. The 
meeting will commence at 1:00 p.m. and continue until conclusion of the 
committee's agenda.

LOCATION: Legal Services Corporation, 750 First Street NE, 11th Floor, 
Washington, DC 20002, (202) 336-8800.

STATUS OF MEETING: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

    1. Adoption of Agenda.
    2. Approval of Minutes of September 8-9, 1995, Joint Meeting of 
the Operations and Regulations Committee and the Provision for the 
Delivery of Legal Services Committee.
    3. Staff report on conversion of Corporation's grant-making 
system to one of competitive bidding and the current status of 
grantmaking by the Corporation.
    4. Consider and act on recommendations to make to the Board 
concerning funding policies pursuant to FY '96 LSC appropriation for 
promulgation of national priorities that grantees may use in 
settling local priorities.
    5. Staff report on possible changes in how compliance and 
enforcement are handled by the Corporation.
    6. Consider and act on other business.

CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION: Victor M. Fortuno, General Counsel, 
(202) 336-8800.

SPECIAL NEEDS: Upon request, meeting notices will be made available in 
alternate formats to accommodate visual and hearing impairments. 
Individuals who have a disability and need an accommodation to attend 
the meeting may notify Barbara Asante, at (202) 336-8800.

    Dated: December 7, 1995.
Victor M. Fortuno,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 95-30267 Filed 12-7-95; 2:43 pm]

BILLING CODE 7050-01-M
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3249 

To revise the rules of construction applicable to information reporting requirements imposed on brokers with respect to digital assets, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2021 

Mr. WYDEN (for himself and Ms. LUMMIS) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To revise the rules of construction applicable to information 

reporting requirements imposed on brokers with respect 

to digital assets, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION APPLICABLE TO IN4 FORMATION REPORTING REQUIREMENTS IM5 POSED ON BROKERS WITH RESPECT TO DIG6 ITAL ASSETS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 80603 of the Infrastruc8 ture Investment and Jobs Act is amended by striking sub9 section (d) and inserting the following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3249 IS

1 ‘‘(d) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.— 

2 ‘‘(1) DEFINITION OF BROKER.—Nothing in this 

3 section or the amendments made by this section 

4 shall be construed to create any inference that a per5 son described in section 6045(c)(1)(D) of the Inter6 nal Revenue Code of 1986, as added by this section, 

7 includes any person solely engaged in the business 

8 of— 

9 ‘‘(A) validating distributed ledger trans10 actions, 

11 ‘‘(B) selling hardware or software for 

12 which the sole function is to permit a person to 

13 control private keys which are used for access14 ing digital assets on a distributed ledger, or 

15 ‘‘(C) developing digital assets or their cor16 responding protocols for use by other persons, 

17 provided that such other persons are not cus18 tomers of the person developing such assets or 

19 protocols. 

20 ‘‘(2) BROKERS AND TREATMENT OF DIGITAL

21 ASSETS.—Nothing in this section or the amendments 

22 made by this section shall be construed to create any 

23 inference, for any period prior to the effective date 

24 of such amendments, with respect to— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3249 IS

1 ‘‘(A) whether any person is a broker under 

2 section 6045(c)(1) of the Internal Revenue 

3 Code of 1986, or 

4 ‘‘(B) whether any digital asset is property 

5 which is a specified security under section 

6 6045(g)(3)(B) of such Code. 

7 ‘‘(e) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con8 gress that nothing in the amendments made by this sec9 tion shall be construed to have any effect on the Securities 

10 Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.) or the Securities Ex11 change Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.).’’. 

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

13 this section shall take effect as if included in the enact14 ment of section 80603 of the Infrastructure Investment 

15 and Jobs Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
NO. 07-10-0454-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A DECEMBER 16, 2010

__________________ ____________ KANDY GILBERT, INDIVIDUALLY A ND AS INDEPENDENT EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF ELIZABETH MOORE, APPELLANT V. RONALD E. MOORE, AS INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF OATHER WINFIELD MOORE, APPELLEE

__________________ _______________ FROM THE 286 TH DISTRICT COURT OF HOCKLEY COUNTY; NO. 09-12-21987; HONORABL E PAT PHELAN, JUDGE

__________________ _____________ Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Pending before this Court is Appellant = s Motion to Dismiss Appeal in which she requests that this appeal be dismissed. Wi thout passing on the merits of the case, the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Tex. R. App. P. 42. 1(a)(1). Having dismissed the appeal at Appel lant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will i ssue forthwith.

Patrick A. Pirtle Justice
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

         CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report of Transition Auto Finance II (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Kenneth C. Lowe, the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:    April 30, 2004            /s/ Kenneth C. Lowe
                                   ---------------------------------
                                   Kenneth C. Lowe
                                   Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer

                                       19