alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 235 (Thursday, December 7, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62867-62868]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-29767]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Grassroots Regulatory Partnership Meeting; Southeast Region, New 
Orleans and Nashville Districts; Seafood Industry

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of a public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (Office of External 
Affairs, Office of Regulatory Affairs, Office of the Southeast Region, 

[[Page 62868]]
New Orleans and Nashville Districts, and Center for Food Safety and 
Applied Nutrition) is announcing a free public meeting as a followup to 
a meeting held in April 1995. The New Orleans and Nashville Offices of 
FDA will meet with interested persons in the States of Alabama, 
Louisiana, Mississippi, and Tennessee to address specific issues of 
concern to the seafood processing industry, other stakeholders, and 
FDA. Because the Interstate Shellfish Sanitation Conference addressed 
the issue of Vibrio vulnificus in raw oysters, this meeting will not 
cover that issue. Any other seafood issue will be open for discussion. 
The agency is holding this meeting to promote the President's 
initiative for a partnership approach between front-line regulators and 
the people affected by the work of regulatory agencies, and to create 
local partnerships.

DATES: The public meeting will be held on Friday, January 19, 1996, 
from 10 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be held at the Grand Casino Hotel 
Gulfport, 3305 West Beach Blvd., Gulfport, MS 39501, 601-870-7770 or 1-
800-354-2450.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sandra S. Baxter, FDA Nashville 
District, 297 Plus Park Blvd., Nashville, TN 37217, 615-781-5372, FAX 
615-781-5383.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of April 20, 1995 
(60 FR 19753), FDA announced that a series of Grassroots Regulatory 
Partnership Meetings would be held. This document announces a followup 
meeting to the one held on April 25, 1995, in Atlanta, GA. Those 
persons interested in attending this public meeting should FAX or send 
their registration, and comments or questions desired to be addressed 
to the meeting to the above contact person by January 5, 1996. There is 
no registration fee for this meeting. However, due to space 
limitations, early registration is required. The goal of this meeting 
is to listen to concerns and ideas of the regulated seafood industry 
and other stakeholders, and to identify possible next steps for the 
agency.

    Dated: December 1, 1995.
William B. Schultz,
Deputy Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 95-29767 Filed 12-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EXHIBIT B

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4522-2 Filed: 10/30/19 Entered: 10/30/19 11:56:18 Page 1

of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EXHIBIT B

HOURS BY TASK FOR

FOR THE PERIOD AUGUST 18, 2019 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 17, 2019

TASK DESCRIPTION HOURS

Meetings, Telephone Calls & Emails with Client and/or Client Attorney 49.50

Internal Client Meetings 29.00

Research and Writing 15.00

Travel 74.00

Working with the Media 35.00

Listening to, or Attending, Court Hearings 1.50

Communications with External Stakeholders 19.50

TOTAL 223.50

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4522-2 Filed: 10/30/19 Entered: 10/30/19 11:56:18 Page 2

of 2
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-143718) pertaining to the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, the 2007 Stock Plan and the 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of NeurogesX, Inc. of our report dated March 21, 2008, withrespect to the consolidated financial statements of NeurogesX, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

PaloAlto, California, 

March 21, 2008
Order entered October 7, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00779-CV

HUFFMAN ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC AND PRAIRIE CAPITAL, LLC,

Appellants

V.

MAURICE COLTER AND NI-IDA COLTER, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-21-03561-B

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this appeal is overdue. Accordingly, we ORDER

Robin Washington, Official Court Reporter for County Court at Law No.2, to file, 

no later than October 21, 2022, either the record or written verification no hearings 

were recorded.

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. 

Washington and the parties.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG

JUSTICE
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation
by reference in the following Registration Statements:



|(1) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-143718) pertaining to the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, the 2007 Stock Plan and the 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of
NeurogesX, Inc.,
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-162942, 333-150615 and 333-170491) pertaining to the 2007 Stock Plan and the 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of NeurogesX,
Inc.,
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(3) | Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-150614) of NeurogesX, Inc. and in the related Prospectus, and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(4) | Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-168805) of NeurogesX, Inc. and in the related Prospectus
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our report dated March 29, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of NeurogesX, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) of NeurogesX, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Palo Alto, California

March 30, 2011
Project Category and Professional Hours

For the Period August 1, 2019 through August 31, 2019

Hourly Services and Case Administration - Summary of Hours / Fees by Project and Professional

Total 

Compensation

Exhibit D

Position Rate

PG&E Corporation, et al. (Case No. 19-30088 (DM))

PwC LLP - Management, Tax and Advisory Consultants to the Debtors

Hourly Services

Rate Case Support Services Retention Exhibit #: 01-L; SUPP 01-J

Cynthia Lorie Director $395 161.20 $63,674.00

Jeremy Chasen Senior Manager $345 59.00 $20,355.00

Anthony Kosinski Associate $260 66.50 $17,290.00

Abhijit Kr Dutta Paraprofessional $100 39.50 $3,950.00

Aritra Paul Paraprofessional $100 39.50 $3,950.00

Devnandan Chatterjee Paraprofessional $100 44.70 $4,470.00

Samprit Mukherjee Paraprofessional $100 16.50 $1,650.00

Tarusrita Roy Paraprofessional $100 35.00 $3,500.00

Subtotal - Rate Case Support Services 461.90 $118,839.00

Wildfire Mitigation Plan Support Services Retention Exhibit #: SUPP 01-U

Cynthia Lorie Director $395 5.50 $2,172.50

Jeremy Chasen Senior Manager $345 9.00 $3,105.00

Anthony Kosinski Associate $260 5.50 $1,430.00

Subtotal - Wildfire Mitigation Plan Support Services 20.00 $6,707.50

Subtotal - Hourly Services 481.90 $125,546.50

Case Administration

Bankruptcy Requirements and Other Court Obligations Retention Exhibit #: CASE

Andrea Clark Smith Director $550 18.40 $10,120.00

Nanette J Kortuem Associate $225 19.80 $4,455.00

Subtotal - Bankruptcy Requirements and Other Court Obligations 38.20 $14,575.00

Subtotal - Case Administration 38.20 $14,575.00

Total - Hourly Services and Case Administration 520.10 $140,121.50

Monday, December 30, 2019

Page 1 of 1

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5229-4 Filed: 12/31/19 Entered: 12/31/19 09:45:02 Page 1

of 1
#### STATE v. LUTHER KIMMER.

(Filed 10 December, 1958.)

Criminal Law § 111—

A charge that the jury should, scrutinize the testimony of defendant’s wife in his behalf, without giving the qualifying instruction that if the jury, after scrutiny, should believe her testimony to give it the same weight as the testimony of a disinterested witness, is error.

Parker, J., not sitting.

Appeal by defendant from *Crissman, J.,*September Term, 1958, of Surry.

"Criminal prosecution on a three-count indictment charging (1) breaking and entering in violation of G.S. 14-54, (2) larceny, and (3) receiving stolen goods in violation of G.S. 14-71.

The court instructed the jury not to consider the third count.

As to the first and second counts, the jury returned a verdict of guilty; and judgment, imposing a prison sentence, was pronounced.

•Defendant excepted and appealed.

*Attorney General Seawell and Assistant Attorney General Love for the State.*

*.. Frank Freeman for defendant, appellant.*

Per Curiam.

The Attorney General rightly concedes that, on authority of *S. v. Davis,*223 N.C. 57, 25 S.E. 2d 187, defendant is entitled to a new trial on account of error in the charge.

Defendant’s wife testified in his behalf. In reviewing the State’s contentions, the court called attention to her status as an interested witness whose testimony should be scrutinized in the light of her interest. However, the court inadvertently failed to give an instruction to the effect that if, after such scrutiny, the jury believed her testimony, it should be given the same weight as the testimony of a disinterested credible witness.

Since a new trial, must be awarded for the court’s failure to give the indicated qualifying instruction, discussion of defendant’s other assignments of error is unnecessary. The questions raised therein involve matters that may not recur at the next trial.

New trial.

■ Parker, J., not sitting.
#### In re Will and Estate of CURTIS B. JOHNSON, Deceased.

(Filed 9 May, 1951.)

Appeal and Error § 31e—

Where the questions sought to be presented become moot as of the time for decision, the appeal will be dismissed.

Appeal by tbe Union National Bank, respondent, and Ida J. Lee, George L. Lee, Harry J. Lee and S. M. Lee, Jr., interveners, from judgment of *Sink, J.,*at March Term, 1951, Regular Civil Term of MecK-LENBUKG.

Petition in tbe cause to determine collectorship of estate pending appeal *in re*letters to personal representative.

Following tbe judgment of Phillips, J., entered in this matter on 11 December, 1950, suggesting that in tbe event of an appeal from bis judgment, tbe Clerk appoint “some other discreet person” as collector to preserve tbe estate pending tbe appeal, tbe Clerk did, on 22 January, 1951, enter an order appointing the Union National Bank of Charlotte as such collector, to which order tbe American Trust Company objected and appealed to the judge of tbe Superior Court who reversed tbe Clerk’s order and directed that be appoint “some discreet person other than Union National Bank of Charlotte or American Trust Company, pending final determination” of tbe appeal from tbe judgment of Phillips, J., as aforesaid, and from this judgment tbe Union National Bank, tbe sister and nephews of tbe deceased, objected and appealed, assigning errors.

*Tillett, Campbell, Craighill <& Rendleman for respondent, Union National Bank, appellant.*

*Covington ■& Lobdell for interveners, Ida J. Lee, et al., appellants.*

*Helms & Mulliss and John W. Jojinston for American Trust Co., appellee.*

Stacy, C. J.

This is tbe second appeal from orders entered in tbe same matter. As tbe order here appealed from affects only tbe collector-ship of tbe estate pending tbe original appeal, decided this day, it is apparent that tbe questions 'presently sought to be presented are now moot or academic as tbe pendency of tbe appeal comes to an end simultaneously herewith. Hence this second appeal will be dismissed and tbe appellants taxed with tbe costs.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 3.3

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                       OF

                              AMENDED AND RESTATED

                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                        SAVVIS COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION

                                     * * * *


SAVVIS Communications Corporation, a corporation organized and existing under
and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware,

DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

         FIRST: That the Board of Directors of said corporation, by unanimous
written consent dated March 13, 2002, adopted a resolution proposing and
declaring advisable the following amendment to the Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, of SAVVIS Communications Corporation:

         RESOLVED, that the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation,
as amended, of SAVVIS Communications Corporation be amended by deleting Article
4.1 in its entirety and substituting therefor the following so that, as amended,
said Article shall be and read as follows:

         "The total number of shares of all classes of stock that the
Corporation shall have the authority to issue is 950,000,000, of which
900,000,000 of such shares shall be common stock, all of one class, having a par
value of $.01 per share ("Common Stock"), and 50,000,000 of such shares shall be
preferred stock, having a par value of $.01 per share ("Preferred Stock")."

         SECOND: That in lieu of a meeting and vote of stockholders, the
stockholders have given written consent to said amendment in accordance with the
provisions of Section 228 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware and written notice of the adoption of the amendment has been given as
provided in Section 228 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware
to every stockholder entitled to such notice.

         THIRD: That the aforesaid amendment was duly adopted in accordance with
the applicable provisions of Sections 242 and 228 of the General Corporation Law
of the State of Delaware.
<PAGE>


          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, SAVVIS COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION has caused this
Certificate to be signed by David J. Frear, its Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer, who hereby acknowledges under penalties of perjury that
the facts herein stated are true and that this Certificate is his act and deed,
this 16th day of July, 2002.


                                              SAVVIS COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION,
                                              a Delaware corporation


                                              By: /s/ David J. Frear


                                       2
exv10w1






Exhibit 10.1




2009 AMENDMENT

TO

GLOBAL INDUSTRIES, LTD.

1998 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN




     The Global Industries, Ltd. 1998 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended as
follows (terms not otherwise defined herein have the meaning ascribed to them in the Plan),
effective as of August 5, 2009:



     1. Section (c)(aa) of Article IX of the Plan shall be amended to read as follows:




     “(aa) any person (within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) under the Exchange
Act, including any group (within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) under the Exchange
Act), a “Person”) except an underwriter or group of underwriters in connection with
a public offering of the Common Stock, is or becomes the “beneficial owner” (as such
term is defined in Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act), directly or
indirectly, of securities of the Company (such Person being referred to as an
“Acquiring Person”) representing 50% of the combined voting power of the Company’s
outstanding securities other than beneficial ownership by (i) the Company or any
Subsidiary of the Company or (ii) any employee benefit plan of the Company or any
Person organizes, appointed or established pursuant to the terms of any such
employee benefit plan (unless such plan or Person is a party to or is utilized in
connection with a transaction led by Outside Persons as defined below) (Persons
referred to in clauses (i) and (ii) hereof are referred to as “Excluded Persons”);”



     2. The second paragraph of Section (c) of Article IX of the Plan shall be amended to read as
follows:



          “For purposes of clause (aa) above, the term “Outside Persons” means any Persons other than
Persons described in clauses (aa)(i) above or members of senior management of the Company in office
immediately prior to the time the Acquiring Person acquires the beneficial ownership described in
clause (aa).”




     3. The Plan as amended and modified by this 2009 Amendment shall remain in full force and
effect and this 2009 Amendment shall not change or modify the terms of any outstanding Awards under
the Plan.



     Adopted by the Board of Directors of Global Industries, Ltd. on August 5, 2009.
#### William H. Doran, an Infant, etc., Respondent, v. The City of Troy, Appellant.

Judgment reversed, new trial granted, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Landon, J.
a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b.
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;c.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andd.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: November 3, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Joseph Patrick HannanJoseph Patrick HannanVice President and Interim Chief Financial Officer 52
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 3.3.1

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                  TO BYLAWS OF
                                 LANDACORP, INC.

      The undersigned, being Secretary of Landacorp, Inc. (the "COMPANY") hereby
certifies that Article I, Section 1.2 of the Bylaws of the Company was amended
by the Board of Directors, effective June 19, 2003, to read as follows:

      "A special meeting of the stockholders may be called at any time by (i)
the board of directors, (ii) the chairman of the board, (iii) the chief
executive officer, (iv) the president, or (v) one or more stockholders holding
shares in the aggregate entitled to cast not less than ten percent (10%) of the
votes at that meeting."

Dated: June 19, 2003



                                              /s/ Mark Rapoport
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Mark Rapoport, Secretary
a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b.
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;c.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andd.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: November 1, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Lewis W. Dickey, Jr.Lewis W. Dickey, Jr.Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer