alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 By Notice dated October 21, 2009, and published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on October 29, 2009 (74 FR 55858), Johnson Matthey, Inc., Pharmaceutical Materials, 2003 Nolte Drive, West Deptford, New Jersey 08066-1742, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as an importer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed in schedule II: Drug
SchedulePhenylacetone (8501)
IICoca Leaves (9040)
IIThebaine (9333)
IIOpium, raw (9600)
IINoroxymorphone (9668)
IIPoppy Straw Concentrate (9670)
II
 The company plans to import the listed controlled substances as raw materials for use in the manufacture of bulk controlled substances for distribution to its customers. No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and 952(a), and determined that the registration of Johnson Matthey, Inc. to import the basic classes of controlled substances is consistent with the public interest, and with United States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or protocols in effect on May 1, 1971, at this time. DEA has investigated Johnson Matthey, Inc. to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 952(a) and 958(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34, the above named company is granted registration as an importer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed. Dated: May 28, 2010. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 2010-13737 Filed 6-7-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, Michelle Gill, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of GSAA Home Equity Trust 2007-1 (the "Exchange Act periodic
    reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
    fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
    material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP as Servicer and Wells Fargo Bank, N.
    A. as Master Servicer and Securities Administrator.

    Dated:   March 31, 2008


    /s/ Michelle Gill

    Michelle Gill
    Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
Exhibit 31.4

CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Charles J. Dockendorff, certify that:

(1) I
have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Covidien plc;

(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/    Charles J.
Dockendorff                       
|Charles J. Dockendorff                              
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                                                    
|January 22, 2015
#### Jack A. Kaufman, Respondent, *v.*Goldman Stores Corporation, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

January 8, 1937.

*Stern & McGivney [Arthur A. McGivney of*counsel], for the appellant.

*Weisman, Quinn, Allan & Spett [Maurice Knapp*of counsel], for the respondent.

Per Curiam.

The action for damages for unlawful discharge proceeds upon the theory that the contract of employment is kept alive. Acceptance at the time of the alleged discharge by an employee of a check in full payment for salary and other claims, followed by the organization and carrying on shortly thereafter of his own competitive business, which he induced some and attempted to induce other employees of his former employer to join, is incompatible with the recovery of damages for such a discharge. It must be assumed under the circumstances that the acts of the employee constituted an acceptance by him of the termination by the employer of the employment agreement.

Judgment reversed, with costs, and judgment directed for defendant, with costs.

All concur. Present — Lydon, Hammer and FrankbnthaLER, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 235 (Thursday, December 7, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 62871]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-29758]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Meeting of the 
National Advisory General Medical Sciences Council

    Pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, notice is hereby give of the meeting of 
the National Advisory General Medical Sciences Council, National 
Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 
on January 25-26, 1996, Building 45, Rooms E1 and E2, Bethesda, 
Maryland.
    This meeting will be open to the public from 11 a.m. to 6 p.m. on 
January 25, and from 8:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. on January 26, for the 
discussion of program policies and issues, opening remarks, report of 
the Acting Director, NIGMS, and other business of Council. Attendance 
by the public will be limited to space available.
    In accordance with provisions set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 
552b(c)(6), title 5, U.S.C. and sec. 10(d) of Pub. L. 92-463, the 
meeting will be closed to the public on January 25 from 8:30 a.m. to 11 
a.m., and on January 26, from 10:30 a.m. until adjournment, for the 
review, discussion, and evaluation of individual grant applications. 
The discussions of these applications could reveal confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
applications, disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    Mrs. Ann Dieffenbach, Public Information Officer, National 
Institute of General Medical Services, National Institutes of Health, 
Natcher Building, Rooms 3AS-43H, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, telephone: 
301-496-7301, FAX 301-402-0224, will provide a summary of the meeting, 
and a roster of Council members. Individuals who plan to attend and 
need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other 
reasonable accommodations, should contact Mrs. Dieffenbach in advance 
of the meeting. Dr. W. Sue Shafer, Executive Secretary, NAGMS Council, 
National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, Rooms 2AN-32C, 
Bethesda, Maryland 20892, telephone: 301-594-4499 will provide 
substantive program information upon request.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.821, 
Biophysics and Physiological Sciences; 93.859, Pharmacological 
Sciences; 93.862, Genetics Research; 93.863, Cellular and Molecular 
Basis of Disease Research; 93.880, Minority Access Research Careers 
[MARC]; and 93.375, Minority Biomedical Research Support [MBRS]; 
Special Programs, 93.960)

    Dated: December 1, 1995.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 95-29758 Filed 12-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4496 Filed: 10/28/19 Entered: 10/28/19 15:33:55 Page 1 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4496 Filed: 10/28/19 Entered: 10/28/19 15:33:55 Page 2 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4496 Filed: 10/28/19 Entered: 10/28/19 15:33:55 Page 3 of

3
Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14 
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934  I, Zhiguo Fu, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Advanced Battery Technologies, Inc. (the Registrant), certify that: 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A (Amendment No. 1) for the period ended March 31, 2006 of the Registrant. 2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. 3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in the report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods, presented in the report. 4.   The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5.   The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent function): (a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting. Dated:  June  21,  2007/s/ Zhiguo Fu
Zhiguo Fu
Chief Executive Officer
#### STATE v. RUSSELL BUCK.

(Filed 25 March, 1953.)

Criminal Law § 53i—

An instruction that the jury had the “right to consider” defendant’s evidence of good character upon the question of his guilt or innocence, and also “ought to consider it” as corroborative evidence, *held,*not prejudicial, it appearing that the jury was given to understand that it was their duty to consider the character evidence in both aspects.

Appeal by defendant from *Grady, Emergency Judge,*January Term, 1953, of Pitt.

No error.

The defendant was indicted for assault with deadly weapon, to wit, a rifle and shotgun, upon the person of the State’s witness. The jury returned verdict of guilty, and from judgment imposing sentence the defendant appealed.

*Attorney-General McMullan, Assistant Attorney-General Moody, and Gerald F. White, Member of Staff, for the State.*

*Albion Duwn for defendant, appellant.*

PeR Curiam.

The several assignments of error brought forward in defendant’s appeal, based upon exceptions noted to ruling of the court during the trial, have been duly considered and found to be without substantial merit.

*435The defendant assigned error in tbe charge of the court in that, in referring to evidence of good character of the defendant the court charged that the jury had the “right to consider” this evidence in passing upon his guilt or innocence, and that the jury also “ought to consider it” as corroborative evidence. It was argued that a distinction was thus made with respect to the consideration to be given character evidence on the question of guilt or innocence, and that to be given it as corroborative.

The portion of the charge to which exception was noted was as follows :

> “He (defendant) has offered in evidence the good character of him and his son. That is to be considered first upon the question of guilt or innocence. A man charged with crime has the right to show that he is a man of good character. The jury has the right to consider that in passing upon the guilt or innocence. You also ought to consider it as corroborative evidence.”

We think it sufficiently appears that the jury was given to understand that it was their duty to consider character evidence in both aspects. The court charged this evidence “is to be considered” by the jury both as substantive and corroborative evidence. We.think no harm has resulted to the defendant from the manner in which this instruction was stated. It was said in *S. v. Taylor,*236 N.C. 130, 71 S.E. 2d 924, that “the use of the word ‘may’ instead of ‘should’ in this excerpt from the charge is not prejudicial.” See also *S. v. Moore,*185 N.C. 637, 116 S.E. 161.

There was plenary evidence to sustain the verdict of guilty of assault with deadly weapon. The State’s witness was shot in the face from a blast from a shotgun.

In the trial we find

No error.
| Name                           | Vessel/Activity         | Organization          | Ownership      percentage |
|--------------------------------|-------------------------|-----------------------|---------------------------|
| Star      Bulk Management Inc. | Management      company | Marshall      Islands | 100%                      |
| Star      Beta LLC             | Star      Beta          | Marshall      Islands | 100%                      |
| Star      Kappa LLC            | Star      Kappa         | Marshall      Islands | 100%                      |
| Star      Theta LLC            | Star      Theta         | Marshall      Islands | 100%                      |
| Star      Epsilon LLC          | Star      Epsilon       | Marshall      Islands | 100%                      |
| Star      Zeta LLC             | Star      Zeta          | Marshall      Islands | 100%                      |
| Star      Delta LLC            | Star      Delta         | Marshall      Islands | 100%                      |
| Star      Gamma LLC            | Star      Gamma         | Marshall      Islands | 100%                      |
| Star      Alpha LLC            | Star      Alpha         | Marshall      Islands | 100%                      |
| Star      Iota LLC             | Star      Iota          | Marshall      Islands | 100%                      |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         640,227
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  153,274
<ALLOWANCES>                                    44,000
<INVENTORY>                                    798,341
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,553,769
<PP&E>                                         104,680
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,749
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,284,821
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           69,664
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,031
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,272,790
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,284,821
<SALES>                                         39,745
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,525
<CGS>                                            6,562
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,562
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               270,940
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,011
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (251,951)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (251,951)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (251,951)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4840-4592-8620.1

Exhibit B

SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION BY WORK TASK CODE

FOR THE PERIOD MARCH 1, 2019 THROUGH AUGUST 31, 2019

Task 

Code

Task Description Hours Total Billed

1 Case Administration 9.7 $6,075.00

2 Communications Platform 38.0 $23,171.00

3 Corporate Governance 25.4 $15,819.00

4 Court Proceedings 4.0 $2,520.00

5 Future Wildfire Mitigation 19.4 $9,267.00

6 Meetings and Communications with Committee Professionals 17.5 $8,505.00

7 Meetings and Communications with Creditors 17.0 $10,677.00

8 Public Policy 49.4 $30,951.00

9 Rate Base 20.1 $12,096.00

10 Real Estate 33.6 $21,102.00

11 Retention and Fee Applications 20.4 $12,771.00

Total 254.5 $152,954.00

See notes regarding certain discounts and reductions above.

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4726-2 Filed: 11/14/19 Entered: 11/14/19 14:22:32 Page 1

of 1
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of SteelCloud, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven Snyder, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods
presented therein.




Date:
      June 21, 2010
                  By:
                  /s/ Steven SnyderName:
      Steven SnyderTitle:
      Chief Executive Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, and
      Controller
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Fausto Celestino, Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Appellate Advocates, (Benjamin S. Litman of counsel), for appellant.Richmond County District Attorney, (Morrie I. Kleinbart of counsel), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Richmond County (Raymond Rodriguez, J.), rendered December 17, 2015. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of driving while intoxicated (common law). Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), seeking leave to withdraw as counsel.</p><p>ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.</p><p>We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to <i>Anders v California</i> (386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (<i>see id.</i>; <i>Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.]</i>, 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; <i>People v Paige</i>, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; <i>cf. People v Gonzalez</i>, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).</p><br>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.<br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: May 04, 2018<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>