alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of      1934; and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results      of operation of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | May      18, 2009 |   | By:    | /s/      Douglas Crawford                             |   |
|--------|-------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |              |   |   | Douglas      CrawfordPrincipal      Executive Officer |   |

|  Date: | May      18, 2009 |   | By:    | /s/      Douglas Crawford                              |   |
|-------------|-------------------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|        |              |   |   | Douglas      CrawfordPrincipal      Accounting Officer |   |
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, Michelle Gill, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of GSR Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-AR1 (the "Exchange Act
    periodic reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
    fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
    material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP as Servicer, GMAC Mortgage, LLC
    as Sub-Servicer for Residential Funding Company, LLC as Servicer,
    Homecomings Financial, LLC as Sub-Servicer for Residential Funding Company,
    LLC as Servicer, National City Mortgage Co. as Servicer, PHH Mortgage
    Corporation as Servicer, Residential Funding Company, LLC as Servicer, Wells
    Fargo Bank, N.A. as Servicer and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master Servicer
    and Securities Administrator.

    Dated:   March 31, 2008


    /s/ Michelle Gill

    Michelle Gill
    Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 1196

_____________________________
D AMIEN B. F ORD , Appellant,

v.

F LORIDA H OSPITAL E AST O RLANDO , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Florida Commission on Human Relations

. May 28, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. See Marchman v. St. Anthony’s Hosp., Inc. , 152 So. 3d 830, 831 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (holding that the Florida Commission on Human Relations lacked jurisdiction over hospitals) ; Crane v. Lifemark Hosp. of Fla., Inc. , 149 So. 3d 718, 72 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) ( concluding that a hospital was not a covered establishment under the Florida Civil Rights Act ). Se e also Mena v. Lifemark Hosps. of Fla., Inc. , Final Order No. 12

- 023, 2012 Fla. Div. Adm. Hear. LEXIS 253, *4 (FCHR May 16, 2012) ( a hospital cafeteria can not turn a hospital into a place of public accommodation )
, aff ’ d, Mena v. Lifemark Hosp s . of Fla., In c. , 109 So. 3d 787 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).

R OWE , R AY , and O STERHAUS , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Richard S. Larson of Rick Larson Law, Winter Garden
, for Appellant.

Craig S. Foels, Christian P. Trowbridge, and Dinelia Concepcion of Estes, Ingram, Foels & Gibbs, P.A., Maitland
, for Appellee.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 22, 2015

jam

Order 

Clerk

July 22, 2015

152004 (26)

IN RE FORSYTH

__________________________________

RONALD HENRY FORSYTH,

Plaintiff, 

v SC: 152004

COA: 326726

TUSCOLA CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE, 

Defendant.

___________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it 

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be 

liable for filing fees. 

Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the 

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $190.00, shall submit a copy of this 

order with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being 

returned with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not 

being filed in this Court.

If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly 

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of 

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of 

$185.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court.

Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in civil 

actions in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and 

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed December 14, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-2381

Lower Tribunal No. 20-1066A

________________

K. B., a juvenile,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Scott M. 

Bernstein, Judge.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Susan S. Lerner, Assistant 

Public Defender, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sonia Perez, Assistant 

Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, GORDO, and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4816-1 Filed: 11/19/19 Entered: 11/19/19 15:28:01 Page 1

of 2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4816-1 Filed: 11/19/19 Entered: 11/19/19 15:28:01 Page 2

of 2
Form TRANSC

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

California Northern Bankruptcy Court

In re Debtor(s):

PG&E Corporation

Case No.: 19−30088 DM 11

Chapter: 11

NOTICE OF FILING OF TRANSCRIPT

AND DEADLINES RELATED TO RESTRICTION AND REDACTION

A transcript of the proceeding held on December 17, 2019 was filed on December 19, 2019. The following deadlines

apply:

The parties have until Thursday, December 26, 2019 to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of

this transcript. The deadline for filing a request for redaction is Thursday, January 9, 2020.

If a request for redaction is filed, the redacted transcript is due Tuesday, January 21, 2020.

If no such notice is filed, the transcript may be made available for remote electronic access upon expiration of the

restriction period, which is Wednesday, March 18, 2020, unless extended by court order.

To review the transcript for redaction purposes, you may purchase a copy from the transcriber,

Jason Gottlieb

Attn: Jason Gottlieb, Dir. of Tran. Ops.

7227 N 16th St. #207

Phoenix, AZ 85020

or you may view the document at the clerk's office public terminal.

Dated: 12/23/19 For the Court:

Edward J. Emmons

Clerk of Court

United States Bankruptcy Court

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5169-1 Filed: 12/19/19 Entered: 12/19/19 07:35:08 Page 1

of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Budhwantie Ferri, Appellant.

[773 NYS2d 586]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Firetog, J.), rendered September 10, 2002.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed *(see People v Kazepis,*101 AD2d 816 [1984]). Santucci, J.P., Smith, Luciano and Adams, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION and PACIFIC GAS 

AND ELECTRIC COMPANY,

 Debtors 

Chapter 11 

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

(Jointly Administered) 

TRANSFER OF CLAIM OTHER THAN FOR SECURITY 

A CLAIM HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS CASE or deemed filed under 11 U.S.C. § 1111(a). 

Transferee hereby gives evidence and notice pursuant to Rule 3001(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of 

Bankruptcy Procedure of the transfer, other than for security, of the claim referenced in this 

evidence and notice. 

Northwest Aerial Reconnaissnce Inc Cherokee Debt Acquisition, LLC 

Name of Transferor Name of Transferee

Name and Current Address of 

Transferor: 

Northwest Aerial Reconnaissnce Inc 

19689 7th Ave NE 322 

Poulsbo, WA 98370 

Attn: Reinhard Schroeder 

Name and Address where notices and payments 

to transferee should be sent: 

Cherokee Debt Acquisition, LLC 

1325 Avenue of the Americas, 28th Floor 

New York, NY 10019 

Attn: Vladimir Jelisavcic 

Schedule/Claim No. Creditor Name Amount Debtor Case No. 

Schedule F 

(#1033526 & 3.2675) 

Northwest Aerial 

Reconnaissnce Inc

$11,185.00 Pacific Gas and Electric Company 19-30089 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the information provided in this notice is true and correct 

to the best of my knowledge and belief. 

By: _____________________ Date: October 18, 2019 

Transferee/Transferee’s Agent

Penalty for making a false statement: Fine of up to $500,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years, 

or both. 18 U.S.C. §§ 152 & 3571. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4266 Filed: 10/18/19 Entered: 10/18/19 09:02:35 Page 1 of

2
17

Vladimir Jelisavcic

Manager

 & 1033526)

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4266 Filed: 10/18/19 Entered: 10/18/19 09:02:35 Page 2 of

2
Annual Performance Incentive Plan for 2009 (first half)



 EXHIBIT 10(e)(25) 
 Annual Performance Incentive Plan (“APIP”) for First Half 2009 
 Under the 2009 APIP, executive officers of the Company are eligible to receive performance related cash payments. Payments are, in general, only made if performance objectives established by the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors (the “Committee”) are met. 
 The Committee previously approved an incentive target opportunity for the first half
of 2009, expressed as a percentage of base salary, for each participating officer. The Committee established overall threshold, base, target and maximum measures of performance for the first half of 2009 APIP at its February 2009 meeting. The
performance measures and weightings for the first half of 2009 were core cash flow from operations (65%) and earnings per share (35%). Certain additional goals were established for some officers based on business unit goals. 
 The performance against the first half 2009 APIP goals was as follows: On an adjusted basis, earnings per share was below threshold and core cash
flow from operations exceeded maximum, resulting in an overall factor of 125% for the first half of 2009.
#### JIM WHITE v. H. A. LOGAN, JR.

(Filed 20 October, 1954.)

1. Payment § 9—

Tbe plea of payment is an affirmative defense and tbe general rule is that tbe burden of showing payment must be assumed by tbe party interposing it.

3. Evidence § 7a—

The burden of proof is a substantial right.

3. Bills and Notes § 35—

Where, in an action on a note, defendant admits tbe execution of tbe note and pleads payment in full, tbe burden is upon him to prove tbis defense, and an instruction that tbe plaintiff had tbe burden of establishing by tbe greater weight of tbe evidence that defendant was indebted to him in some amount, and tbe amount of the indebtedness, must be held prejudicial error.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Pless, J.,*and a jury, at March-April Term, 1954, of CLEVELAND.

Civil action on promissory note. Tbe plaintiff alleges a balance due of $1,089.20. Tbe defendant in bis further defense admits tbe execution of tbe note and pleads payment in full. On tbe issue of payment thus raised tbe trial court charged tbe jury, among other things, that “tbe plaintiff, Mr. "White, has tbe burden of establishing by tbe greater weight of tbe evidence that tbe defendant, Mr. Logan, is indebted to him in some amount, and tbe amount of it.” Exception by plaintiff.

Tbe jury found for their verdict that tbe defendant owes a balance of $200. From judgment on tbe verdict, the plaintiff appeals.

*Horace Kennedy for plaintiff, appellant.*

*No counsel contra.*

Johnson, J.

It is well settled that tbe plea of payment is an affirmative one, and tbe general rule is that tbe burden of showing payment must be assumed by tbe party interposing it. *Davis v. Dockery,*209 N.C. 272, 183 S.E. 396; *Furst v. Taylor,*204 N.C. 603, 169 S.E. 185; *Collins v.*
      *792
      *Vandiford,*196 N.C. 237, 145 S.E. 235; *Swan v. Carawan,*168 N.C. 472, 84 S.E. 699. See also *Joyce v. Sell,*233 N.C. 585, 64 S.E. 2d 837; 8 Am. Jur., Bills and Notes, Sec. 1035; 40 Am. Jur., Payment, Sec. 278. The burden of proof is a substantial right. *Davis v. Dockery, supra; Collins v. Vandiford, supra.*

Here tbe defendant’s plea of payment cast on him tbe burden of proving tbe affirmative of tbe issue thus raised. However, tbe trial court inadvertently placed tbe burden of proof on tbe plaintiff. This entitles tbe plaintiff to a

New trial.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153-0119

EXHIBIT 1-D

Camp Fire Services

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-5 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page 1

of 7
REDACTED VERSION OF THE PROPOSED REDACTED DOCUMENT

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-5 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page 2

of 7
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-5 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page 3

of 7
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-5 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page 4

of 7
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-5 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page 5

of 7
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-5 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page 6

of 7
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-5 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page 7

of 7
exv10w4





Exhibit 10.4



Amendments to

Visteon Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors




June 10, 2009




     Section 2(a) of the Visteon Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors
(the “Plan”) is amended by adding a new subaccount under the Plan, as follows:




“Post-Petition Voluntary Deferral Subaccount” means the amount credited to the Participant’s
Account on and after June 1, 2009, as a result of the Participant’s election to make
Voluntary Deferrals plus interest credited as of the last day of each month prior to
distribution. The interest rate for any calendar year will be a rate that, when credited
and compounded monthly, equals the annual rate of interest on 10-year Treasury securities
for the first day in the September immediately preceding the first day of the year for which
interest is being paid. The interest credited for any month will be equal to one-twelfth of
the product obtained by multiplying the balance of the Participant’s Post-Petition Voluntary
Deferral Subaccount on the first day of the month by the applicable interest rate for the
year.”



     Section 4(b) of the Plan is amended by adding a new sentence at the end thereof to read as
follows:




“Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 4(b), this Section 4(b) shall not
apply to Voluntary Deferrals made by or on behalf of a Participant with respect to
remuneration for services as a non-employee member of the Board on or after June 1, 2009,
and such Voluntary Deferrals shall be credited to the Participant’s Post-Petition Voluntary
Deferral Subaccount.”



     Section 4(c) of the Plan is amended to read as follows:




“Each Participant shall at all times be 100% vested in his or her Voluntary Deferral
Subaccount and Post-Petition Voluntary Deferral Subaccount.”



     Section 6(a) of the Plan is amended by adding a new sentence at the end thereof to read as
follows:




“Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 6(a), this Section 6(a) shall not
apply to cash dividends payable on or after June, 2009, and any such dividends shall be
reflected in a separate subaccount under the Plan.”
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James W. Clark, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed and proceedings remitted to the Court of Sessions of Onondaga county with directions to proceed. Opinion by

Hardin, P. J.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of SteelCloud, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brian H. Hajost Chief
Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods
presented therein.




Date:
      March 19, 2010By:
                /s/
      Brian H. HajostName:
      Brian H. HajostTitle:
      Chief Executive Officer and
President
July 9, 2015



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DAWN PATRICE MOORE , Appellant

NO. 14

- 14

- 00350

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

____________ ____________________ This cause was heard on the transcripts of the record of the court below, and having inspected the record, the Court holds there was no error in the judgment requiring reversal, but there was error in the ju dgment as entered, which is cap able of reformation by this Court. Therefore, the judgment is REFORMED to reflect appellant’s plea to the motion to adjudicate as “N/A” and the fine as “$0.”
The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED as REFORMED

.

We further order this decision certifi ed below for observance.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5359 Filed: 01/14/20 Entered: 01/14/20 10:27:00 Page 1 of

1
Exhibit 32.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SteelCloud, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin Murphy Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
of MY knowledge:


1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: September 14, 2004

                                             By: /S/ KEVIN MURPHY
                                             --------------------
                                             Name: Kevin Murphy
                                             Title: Chief Financial Officer








                                                                              30



<PAGE>