alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### William V. Havens, Appellant, v. John C. McCarthy, Respondent.

Judgment reversed and anew trial ordered in the County Court of Onondaga county, with costs to abide the event. Opinion by

Hardin, P. J.
**Exhibit 23.2**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in this Registration Statement (No. 333-154402 and No. 333-154403) on Form S-8 of ChromaDex Corporation, formerly Cody Resources, Inc., of our report dated March 27, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of CodyResources, Inc. as of December 29, 2007 and November 30, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the period December 1, 2007 to December 29, 2007. 

/s/ MOORE & ASSOCIATES, CHARTERED 

Moore & Associates,Chartered 

Las Vegas, Nevada 

April 3, 2009
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lionbridge Technologies, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Rory J. Cowan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Stephen J. Lifshatz, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 9, 2007



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/S/    RORY J. COWAN                 
|Rory J. Cowan Chief Executive Officer



|                                           
|-------------------------------------------
|                                           
|/S/    STEPHEN J.
LIFSHATZ                 
|Stephen J. Lifshatz Chief Financial Officer
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 241 (Friday, December 15, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 64314-64315]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30591]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

10 CFR Part 440

[Docket No. EE-RM-94-401]

Weatherization Assistance Program for Low-Income Persons

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) is publishing a rule finalizing 
amendments to the regulations for the Weatherization Assistance Program 
for Low-Income Persons that changed the formula used to distribute 
funds among the States under the Program.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 15, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Greg Reamy, Weatherization Assistance 
Program Division, U.S. Department of Energy, Mail Stop EE-532, 1000 
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585, (202) 426-1698.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DOE issued an interim final rule on June 5, 
1995 (60 FR 29469) that amended the formula used to distribute funds 
among the States under the Weatherization Assistance Program. Those 
changes were based on direction in the Conference Report on the 
Department of Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations Act of 1995 
which accompanied Public Law 103-332. DOE received no comments on the 
interim final rule. Accordingly, the interim final rule is adopted as a 
final rule without change.

List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 440

    Definitions and allocation of funds.

[[Page 64315]]

    Issued in Washington, DC on December 8, 1995.
Christine A. Ervin,
Assistant Secretary, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.

10 CFR Part 440--Weatherization Assistance Program for Low-Income 
Persons

    Under the authority of 42 U.S.C. 6861-6871 and 42 U.S.C. 7191, the 
interim final rule amending 10 CFR Part 440, which was published on 
June 5, 1995 (60 FR 29469), is adopted as a final rule without change.

[FR Doc. 95-30591 Filed 12-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
**EXHIBIT        32.2**

|   | 1. | The                  Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                  or                  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                  and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                  information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in                  all                  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                  of                  the Company. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                  April 11, 2008 | /s/                  Jana Whitlock                                                                    |
|---------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                  | Jana                  Whitlock, President, CEO and CFO (Principal Financial                  Officer) |

----
[No. 24353.

Department Two.

February 27, 1933.]

#### Jack Marcinko, *Respondent,*v. Consolidated Mercury Mining Company, *Appellant.*
      *1*

*Kelly é MacMahon,*for appellant.

*Reuben G. Carlson*and *Clarence Layton,*for respondent.

Reported in 19 P. (2d) 395.

Tolman, J.

Respondent in his brief presents a motion to strike the statement of facts because not filed *94within the statutory time,, which motion was argued when the case was called for hearing on the merits.

The judgment appealed from was entered on the verdict of a jury on June 25, 1932. Notice of appeal was given within thirty days, hut the statement of facts was not filed until September 28, 1932, more than ninety days after the entry of the judgment.

The motion is well taken, and under our long continued practice must be and it is granted. *Perkins v. Perkins,*158 Wash. 351, 290 Pac. 855; *Moss v. Moss,*163 Wash. 444, 1 P. (2d) 916; *Brainard v. Miser,*165 Wash. 244, 4 P. (2d) 1097.

The errors assigned are based upon the rulings of the trial court in rejecting certain offers of proof and in dismissing the appellant’s cross-complaint. In the absence of any statement of facts, these matters cannot be inquired into, and the judgment appealed from must be and it is affirmed.

Beals, C. J., Main, Steinert, and Blake, JJ., concur.
#### Mary C. Richardson, Appellant, v. Truman A. Mambert, Respondent.

Judgment of County Court affirmed, with costs.
Exhibit 12.1

NORTHWEST AIRLINES CORPORATION

COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

(Dollars in millions)

|                                                |  | Three months ended
March 31 |    
|----------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- | ---
|
|Earnings:                                       |  |                             |    
|Income (loss) before income taxes               |  | $                           | 4  
|Less: Income from less than 50% owned investees |  |                             | 39 
|Add:                                            |  |                             |    
|Rent expense representative of interest(1)      |  |                             | 55 
|Interest expense net of capitalized interest    |  |                             | 84 
|Interest of preferred security holder           |  |                             | 7  
|Amortization of debt discount and expense       |  |                             | 3  
|Amortization of interest capitalized            |  |                             | 1  
|                                                |  |                             |    
|Adjusted earnings                               |  | $                           | 115
|                                                |  |                             |    
|Fixed charges:                                  |  |                             |    
|Rent expense representative of interest(1)      |  | $                           | 55 
|Interest expense net of capitalized interest    |  |                             | 84 
|Interest of preferred security holder           |  |                             | 7  
|Amortization of debt discount                   |  |                             | 3  
|Capitalized interest                            |  |                             | 4  
|                                                |  |                             |    
|Fixed charges                                   |  | $                           | 153
|                                                |  |                             |    
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges              |  |                             |   

---
#### Edward Collins, Respondent, v. Fort Orange Construction Company, Appellant, Impleaded with The State of New York.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Amendment to the Amended and Restated Long-Term Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.1 
 AMENDMENT TO THE 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED 
 WELLS TIMBERLAND REIT, INC. 
 2005 INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS COMPENSATION PLAN 

 This Amendment (this “Amendment”) to the Amended and Restated Wells Timberland REIT, Inc. 2005 Independent Directors
Compensation Plan (the “Plan”), was adopted on the 24th day of April, 2009, by the Board of Directors of Wells Timberland REIT, Inc. (the “Company”). 
 1. The following sentence shall be deleted from Section 5.2 of the Plan, “No fee shall be paid for non-telephonic committee meetings held on
the same day as a non-telephonic meeting of the Board.” 
 2. Except as specifically set forth herein, the terms of the Plan shall
remain in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to the Plan to be executed by its duly
authorized officer, effective as of the date first above written. 
  

			
	WELLS TIMBERLAND REIT, INC.
		
	By:	 	 
		
	Its:
#### HERBERT K. ADAMS v. HALLIE MAE ADAMS (Original Party Defendant) and T. K. ADAMS, BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY OF FAISON, AND BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY OF WARSAW (Additional Parties Defendant).

(Filed 3 November, 1937.)

Divorce § 13—

In the husband’s suit for divorce, in which the wife flies answer demanding alimony *pendente lite*and alimony without divorce, it is error for the court, upon the hearing for alimony *pendente lite,*C. S., 1666, to issue an order for alimony without divorce under C. S., 1667.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Grady, J.,*at Chambers, from DupliN.

Action for divorce on alleged abandonment and two years separation.

*374Plaintiff alleged that he and defendant were married on 12 May, 1918; that on 19 October, 1931, the defendant without cause willfully abandoned plaintiff and has since lived separate and apart from him, and that he has been a resident of the State for more than two years next preceding the institution of this action.

Defendant filed answer in which she admitted marriage on 12 May, 1918, and that plaintiff had resided in the State, but denied abandonment. As further defense and cross action defendant alleged that plaintiff on numerous occasions had willfully and without cause abandoned the defendant and the four minor children of their marriage, and failed, neglected and refused to provide the necessary subsistence for her and for them in accordance with his means and condition in life; that defendant is without means to' provide reasonable subsistence for herself and children pending the action and to defend the same; that the plaintiff is *“a.*man of property,” owning certain valuable real and personal property. She thereupon prays that plaintiff’s action for divorce be dismissed and that she be awarded custody of the children and alimony without divorce, alimony *pendente lite,*and allowance for reasonable attorney’s fees.

From order dated 3 June, 1937, plaintiff appeals to the Supreme Court and assigns error.

*J. D. Johnson, Jr., for plaintiff, appellant.*

*Butler & Butler for defendant Hallie Mae Adams, appellee.*

WiNBORNE, J.

The order to which this appeal relates was made under C. S., 1667, and is in error. *Dawson v. Dawson,*211 N. C., 453, 190 S. E., 749. The same is stricken out. The cause is remanded to the end that the facts may be found and further proceedings had under C. S., 1666.

Error and remanded.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanced Accessory Systems, LLC (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Terence
C. Seikel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Terence C. Seikel

Terence C. Seikel
Chief Executive Officer
August 5, 2002
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 4.38

Guarantor: Xiaofeng Peng

Address: Xiang Ge Li La Garden #39, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province

ID Number: 360102197505256311

Zip Code: 210024

Tel: 0512-65629698

Fax: 0512-65622785



Guarantor: Shan Zhou

Address: Xiang Ge Li La Garden #39, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province

ID Number: 2301039751112518x

Zip Code: 210024

Tel: 0512-65629698

     Fax: 0512-65622785



Lender: China Development Bank

Address: Hu Cheng Men Wai Street #29, Xi Cheng District, Beijing City

Legal Representative: Yuan Chen

Zip Code: 10037

Tel: 0791-6592391

Fax: 0791-6592333



                              (Summary Translation)

                               Guarantee Agreement

This Agreement is made by and among the National Development Bank (hereinafter
referred to as "Party A"), Mr. Xiaofeng Peng (hereinafter referred to as "Party
B"), Mr. Shan Zhou (hereinafter referred to as "Party C"),



<PAGE>

WHEREAS,

1, The Party A and Jiangxi LDK Solar Hi-Tech Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to
as "Jiangxi LDK") entered into a loan agreement (hereinafter referred to as the
"Loan Agreement"), pursuant to which Party A undertook to lend to Jiangxi LDK
loans in the aggregate principal amount of $25 million (hereinafter referred to
as the "Loan") for a term of 5 years; and

2, Party B and Party C (collectively, the "Guarantors") have agreed to guarantee
the obligations of Jiangxi LDK to perform the Loan Agreement and be jointly and
severally liable for repayment of the Loan with their own personal properties
and community properties in the event of a default by Jiangxi LDK in accordance
with the Loan Agreement.

3, The scope of the guarantee hereunder shall include any principal amounts
outstanding, interests accrued, damages caused and expenses associated with the
realization of Party A's rights under the Loan Agreement.

4, If Jiangxi LDK defaults, Party A is entitled to demand remedies from any of
the Guarantors directly, and the Guarantors shall pay on behalf of Jiangxi LDK
within 5 days upon receiving of request from Party A.

5, The term of the guarantee hereunder shall be until two years after the due
date of each obligation under the Loan Agreement.

6, The parties shall resolve all disputes arising from or in connection with
this Agreement through consultation. If the parties cannot reach an agreement
through such consultations, both parties agree to submit the disputes to the
people's court where Party A's branch office sits.

7, This Agreement shall become effective upon signing by the respective parties
and fixing hereunto the respective corporate chops. This Agreement is made in
three original copies, and each party shall keep one copy hereof.



Party A

/s/ China Development Bank

National Development Bank (sealed)



<PAGE>

Party B

/s/ Xiaofeng Peng

Xiaofeng Peng(sealed)



Party C

/s/ Shan Zhou

Shan Zhou(sealed)



Date: December 29, 2006
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Kyle Gotshalk, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of PSPP Holdings, Inc.



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.



4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in exchange act rules 13a-15(e) and 15d- 15(f)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;



c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: Novemberr 30, 2007



/s/ Kyle Gotshalk

Kyle Gotshalk,

Chief Executive Officer (or equivalent thereof)
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7585]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3056]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Petrotechnical Open Software Corporation

    Notice is hereby given that, on October 17, 1994, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301, et seq. (``the Act''), Petrotechnical Open 
Software Corporation (``POSC'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, the following additional parties have 
become new, non-voting members of POSC: Cap Gemini Sogeti, Houston, TX; 
OGCI Software, Inc., Houston, TX; Electronic Data Systems Corporation, 
Houston, TX; Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA; 
Silicon Graphics Incorporated, Houston, TX; Environmental Systems 
Research Institute, Inc., Relands, CA.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of POSC.
    On January 14, 1991, POSC filed its original notification pursuant 
to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on 
February 7, 1991, (56 FR 5021).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on July 12, 
1994. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on September 1, 1994 (59 FR 45309).
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 95-3056 Filed 2-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
#### Martin G. Hotaling, Jr., by his Guardian, etc., Respondent, v. Edward McKenzie, Appellant.

— Orders affirmed, without costs.

west> brook, J., not actiug.
1

Order entered August 16 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 16

- 00 521

- CV

JEFFREY AGULEFO , Appellant

V.

BANK OF AMERICA, NA , Appellee

On Appeal from the 86th Jud icial District Court

Kaufman County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 92509

- 86



### O RDER

We GRANT appellant’s second motion to extend time to file appellant’s brief.

Appellant’s brief shall be filed on or before SEPTEMBER 15 , 2016

.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS CHI EF JUSTICE