alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      14,587,781
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             4,104,941
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 33,733,198
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      35,093,858
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        35,187,000
<LOANS>                                    194,942,225
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,737,483
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             293,272,389
<DEPOSITS>                                 250,929,939
<SHORT-TERM>                                 4,800,160
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,084,009
<LONG-TERM>                                    961,844
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       266,449
<OTHER-SE>                                  34,229,988
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             293,272,389
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             13,465,515
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            2,996,358
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               215,965
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            16,677,838
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           6,246,745
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,574,783
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       10,103,055
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  157,500
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              7,864,628
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,341,291
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   2,877,353
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,877,353
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.10
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.24
<LOANS-NON>                                  2,867,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                    20,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                152,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,711,362
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  186,031
<RECOVERIES>                                    54,652
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,737,483
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         2,737,483
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary

      ( print page 1114)    
The following Agreements were filed with the Department of Transportation under Sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1382 and 1384) and procedures governing proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 days after the filing of the application.

*Docket Number:*                     DOT-OST-2009-0343.                

*Date Filed:*                     December 16, 2009.                

*Parties:*                     Members of the International Air Transport Association.                

*Subject:*

TC3 Special Passenger Amending Resolution 010k between Japan, Korea (Rep. of) and China (excluding  Hong Kong SAR and Macao SAR), and between Japan and Korea (Rep. of) (Memo 1342) 

*Intended effective date:*                     15 January 2010.                

*Docket Number:*                     DOT-OST-2009-0346.                

*Date Filed:*                     December 16, 2009.                

*Parties:*                     Members of the International Air Transport Association.                

*Subject:*

TC3 Areawide Revalidating Resolution 002, (Memo 1343)

*Intended effective date:*                     1 April 2010.                

Barbara J. Hairston,

Supervisory Dockets Officer, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. 2010-133 Filed 1-7-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 21 (Tuesday, February 2, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 5432]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-01797]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP16-301-000]


Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.; Notice of Initiation of 
Section 5 Proceeding

    On January 21, 2016, the Commission issued an order in Docket No. 
RP16-301-000, pursuant to section 5 of the Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S.C. 
717d (2012), instituting an investigation into the justness and 
reasonableness of Iroquois Gas Transmission System, LP's (Iroquois) 
currently effective tariff rates. The Commission's order directs 
Iroquois to file a full cost and revenue study within 75 days of the 
issuance of the order. Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P., 154 FERC 
]61,028 (2016).

    Dated: January 21, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-01797 Filed 2-1-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### ORLENE WOODY v. COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY, INCORPORATED, OF ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA.

(Filed 25 September, 1940.)

PoocL § 6 — Evidence held sufficient for jury in this action to recover for injuries resulting from foreign, deleterious substance in bottled drink.

Evidence that plaintiff was injured as a result of drinking a bottled drink prepared by defendant which contained a foreign, deleterious substance, that on the same date another person purchased a bottle prepared by defendant which contained a like foreign substance, with evidence that other foreign substances were found on other dates in bottles prepared by defendant, and that when plaintiff took the bottle containing the unconsumed portion of the beverage purchased by her to defendant’s manager, he undertook to demonstrate how bottles were tested under a powerful light and the light would not come on, *is held*sufficient to be submitted to the jury.

Appeal by defendant from *Armstrong, J.,*at February Term, 1940, of Rutheeeoed.

No error.

Civil action to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from drinking a bottled beverage containing a deleterious substance.

*218Plaintiff alleged and offered evidence tending to sbow that on 28' December, 1938, she purchased a bottle of Coca-Cola which was bottled and marketed by the defendant; that she drank a part of the beverage; that she discovered a dirty, oily looking substance in the bottle and that she became sick immediately and suffered ill effects for some time thereafter. She further offered evidence that another party purchased a bottle of the same beverage on the same date which contained a like substance; that another witness purchased a bottle 20 August, 1938, containing glass, and still another witness purchased a bottle 28 July, 1939, containing a spider. She testified that she carried the bottle purchased by her with the unconsumed portion of the beverage therein to the manager of the defendant company; that he undertook to demonstrate to her how bottles were tested under powerful lights to discover the presence of foreign matter before they were put on the market and that the light would not come on.

There was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff and the defendant excepted and appealed.

*Slover P. Dunagan, Harry X. Boucher, and Paul Boucher for plaintiff, appellee.*

*Hamrick & Hamrick for defendant, appellant.*

Pee Cueiam.

The applicable law has been fully discussed by this Court in a number of recent cases. *Perry v. Bottling Co.,*196 N. C., 175, 145 S. E., 14; *Enloe v. Bottling Co.,*208 N. C., 305, 180 S. E., 582; *Blackwell v. Bottling Co.,*208 N. C., 751, 182 S. E., 469; *Collins v. Bottling Co.,*209 N. C., 821, 184 S. E., 834; *Blackwell v. Bottling Co.,*211 N. C., 729, 191 S. E., 887; *Tickle v. Hobgood,*216 N. C., 221; *Evans v. Bottling Co.,*216 N. C., 716. Repetition would serve no good purpose. The evidence was sufficient to be submitted to the jury and in the exceptive assignments of error we fail to find cause for disturbing the verdict.

No error.
DISMISS and Opinion Filed October 31, 2019 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-18-01388-CV

TIM SIEGEL AND JENNIFER SIEGEL AS NEXT FRIENDS OF LXXX SXXXXX, A MINOR CHILD, Appellant V. GALG, LLC D/B/A GOODSON GOLF & UTILITY CARS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-17245



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Molberg, and Reichek Opinion by Chief Justice Burns, III Before the Court is the parties’ October 29, 2019 joint motion to dismiss, with prejudice.

We GRANT the motion and DISMISS the appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).

181388F.P05 /Robert D. Burns, III/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

TIM SIEGEL AND JENNIFER SIEGEL AS NEXT FRIENDS OF LXXX SXXXXX, A MINOR CHILD, Appellant

No. 05-18-01388-CV V.

GALG, LLC D/B/A GOODSON GOLF & UTILITY CARS, Appellee On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-17245. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns. Justices Molberg and Reichek participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opi nion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

.

Judgment entered this 31st day of October 2019.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Rory J. Cowan, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Lionbridge Technologies, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for theregistrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared; 

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles; 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: August 9, 2007
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BAKER 

&

HOSTETLER LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

Robert A. Julian (SBN 88469)

Cecily A. Dumas (SBN 111449)

BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP

1160 Battery Street, Suite 100

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: 628.208.6434

Facsimile: 310.820.8859

Email: rjulian@bakerlaw.com

Email: cdumas@bakerlaw.com

Eric E. Sagerman (SBN 155496)

Lauren T. Attard (SBN 320898)

BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP

11601 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1400

Los Angeles, CA 90025-0509

Telephone: 310.820.8800

Facsimile: 310.820.8859

Email: esagerman@bakerlaw.com

Email: lattard@bakerlaw.com

Counsel to the Official Committee of Tort Claimants

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION

-andPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY,

Debtors.

□ Affects PG&E Corporation

□ Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company

■ Affects both Debtors

*All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case, 

No. 19-30088 (DM)

Bankruptcy Case 

No. 19-30088 (DM)

Chapter 11

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

NOTICE OF RESOLUTION OF 

MOTION OF THE OFFICIAL 

COMMITTEE OF TORT CLAIMANTS 

FOR ENTRY OF AN ORDER 

DETERMINING PROCEDURES FOR 

PRESERVING JURY TRIAL RIGHTS

For Immediate Presentation to Court, or at 

the Court’s Request for Consideration on 

August 27, 2019

Date: September 10, 2019 

(unless shortened)

Time: 9:30 a.m.

Place: United States Bankruptcy Court

Courtroom 17, 16th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94102

Response Deadline: September 3, 2019 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3623 Filed: 08/20/19 Entered: 08/20/19 17:05:25 Page 1 of

2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BAKER 

&

HOSTETLER LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

- 2 -

TO: HONORABLE DENNIS MONTALI, AND PARTIES IN INTEREST:

The Official Committee of Tort Claimants (“TCC”) and PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas 

and Electric Company (“Debtors”) propose to resolve the Motion of the Official Committee of Tort 

Claimants for Entry of an Order Determining Procedures for Preserving Jury Trial Rights (Dkt. No. 

3479) by their agreement to the Court’s entry of the Order Determining Procedures for Preserving 

Jury Trial Rights (“Proposed Order”), attached hereto as Exhibit A . 

The TCC will upload the Order pursuant to that agreement, for consideration by the Court.

Dated: August 20, 2019

BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP

By: s/ Robert A. Julian

Robert A. Julian

Counsel to the Official Committee of Tort 

Claimants 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3623 Filed: 08/20/19 Entered: 08/20/19 17:05:25 Page 2 of

2
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6138** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. ERIC D. WHITE, a/k/a Eric Barnes, a/k/a Tiger, a/k/a Eric Carter, a/k/a Erick Barnes, a/k/a Eric Keene, a/k/a Er ic Kane, a/k/a Eric Tiger , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. ( 1:92

- cr - 00256

- JCC

- 4 )

Submitted : June 17, 2010 Decid ed: June 25, 2010

Before MOTZ and KING , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Eric D. White, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virgini a, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Eric D. White appeals the district court ’ s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion for reduction of
sentence . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. White , No. 1:92

- cr - 00256

- JCC

- 4 (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 5, 2010 & entered Jan. 6, 2010 ) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
cont entions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Jason Hanson, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)        the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Search By Headlines.com
Corp. for the year end period ended July 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2)        the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Search By Headlines.com Corp.

Dated: October 14, 2011



/s/Jason Hanson
Jason Hanson President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer, Principal FinancialOfficer and Principal
Accounting Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Search By
Headlines.com Corp. and will be retained by Search By Headlines.com Corp. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-15-00168-CR

ERIC MOSQUEDA,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 54th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-1757-C2

O R D E R

Appellant’s retained counsel, Christian T. Souza, moves to allow counsel’s 

withdrawal of representation of appellant and for the substitution of Dianne Jones 

McVay as new retained counsel for appellant. Retained counsel Souza has complied with 

Rule 6.5 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(b), (d). 

Accordingly, retained counsel’s “Unopposed Motion for Withdrawal and 

Substitution of Retained Counsel” is granted. Christian T. Souza is withdrawn as 
Mosqueda v. State Page 2

retained counsel for appellant, and Dianne Jones McVay is substituted in as new retained 

counsel for appellant.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion granted

Order issued and filed April 14, 2016
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

**Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 and Rule 15d-14**

**of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934**

 

I, Eric B. Stang, certify that: 

 

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Lexar Media, Inc.; 

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.    The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; 

 

(b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c)    disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.    The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

(a)    all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

 

(b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date:  August 9, 2004