alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.2


July 27, 2009


Patrick E. Keefe

100 E. RiverCenter Blvd.

Suite 1600

Covington, KY 41011


          Re:     Temporary
Salary Reduction Program


Dear Patrick:


          As
you know, Omnicare is implementing a temporary salary reduction program. During
the period of Omnicare’s temporary salary reduction program, your regular base
salary will be reduced by five percent (5%) from its current level. This
reduction in your regular base salary will become effective as of July 16,
2009.


          The
salary reduction does not constitute a breach of, or a failure by Omnicare or
any of its affiliates to observe or perform any of their obligations under,
your employment agreement with Omnicare, dated March 4, 1993 (the “Employment
Agreement”) or any other agreement you may have with Omnicare or any of its
affiliates. The salary reduction will have no effect on the validity or
enforceability of any provision of the Employment Agreement or any other
agreement that you may have with Omnicare or any of its affiliates.
Notwithstanding anything in this letter to the contrary, for purposes of
determining (i) the severance payable pursuant to Section 3.4 of the Employment
Agreement, (ii) the amount of “compensation” under the Excess Pension Benefit
portion of the Excess Benefit Plan and the Excess Savings Benefit portion of
the Excess Benefit Plan and (iii) your benefits under any other employee
benefit plan of Omnicare or any of its affiliates, your base salary shall be
determined without application of the salary reduction set forth above. 


          Nothing
in this letter constitutes an admission by Omnicare or any of its affiliates
that your consent is required to reduce your regular base salary under the
terms of the Employment Agreement or otherwise. If and to the extent necessary,
however, this letter modifies the Employment Agreement to reflect the foregoing
temporary salary reduction. 






          Please
execute and return this letter to show your acknowledgment of and agreement to
the foregoing. We appreciate your efforts on behalf of Omnicare. 


	
 

	
 


	
 

	
Sincerely,


	
 

	
 


	
 

	
/s/ Mark G. Kobasuk


	
 

	
 


	
 

	
Mark G.
 Kobasuk





Agreed and
accepted:


/s/ Patrick E.
Keefe

Employee

Printed Name: Patrick E. Keefe

Date: July 27, 2009
```

[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 238 (Tuesday, December 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 63705]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30204]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-54-000]

Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

December 6, 1995.
    Take notice that on November 30, 1995, Northern Natural Gas Company 
(Northern), tendered for filing, under Section 4 of the Natural Gas Act 
(NGA), notice of termination of gathering services. Northern states 
that on November 29, 1995, an Order Authorizing Abandonment and 
Determining Jurisdictional Status of Facilities (Order) was issued by 
the Commission in the above-referenced Docket Numbers authorizing 
Northern Natural Gas Company (Northern) to abandon certain pipeline, 
compression, dehydrating and delivery point gathering facilities, with 
appurtenances, located in various counties in Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, 
Wyoming and Colorado (Facilities), by sale to its affiliates Enron 
Anadarko Gathering Corp., Enron Gathering Limited Partnership, Enron 
Permian Gathering Inc. and Enron Mountain Gathering Inc. (collectively 
referred to as ``Enron Gathering Companies'').
    Northern states that this filing is being made in compliance with 
the Order.
    Northern states the reason for the termination is the abandonment 
of the Facilities by sale to the Enron Gathering Companies. As a result 
of restructuring under Order No. 636, Northern's merchant services 
obligations have been terminated and Northern no longer requires any 
gas supplies from the Anadarko, Hugoton, Permian or Rocky Mountain 
production areas accessed by the Facilities to fulfill its customer 
obligations.
    Northern states that a notice of this termination has been posted 
on Northern's EBB, consistent with Northern's practice. In addition, 
contemporaneous with this filing, written notice of the termination is 
being provided to each applicable individual gathering shipper.
    Northern also states that copies of the filing were served upon the 
company's customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Secs. 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. Pursuant to Sec. 154.210 of the Commission's 
regulations, all such motions or protests must be filed not later than 
12 days after the date of the filing noted above. All protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken in this proceeding, but will not serve to make Protestant a 
party to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file 
a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-30204 Filed 12-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
A96A1684.

#### JARRETT v. THE STATE.

(474 SE2d 702)

McMURRAY, Presiding Judge.

Defendant Jarrett was convicted of possession of methamphetamine and possession of a dangerous weapon. He requested a bond pending appeal, and the trial court conducted a hearing in accordance with *Birge v. State,*238 Ga. 88 (230 SE2d 895). This appeal is taken from the denial of defendant’s motion for appeal bond based on *522the trial court’s conclusion that there is a likelihood that defendant will intimidate witnesses and interfere with the administration of justice. *Held:*

Decided August 15, 1996.

*Rodney S. Zell,*for appellant.

*Fredric D. Bright, District Attorney, Shelley S. Tice, Assistant District Attorney,*for appellee.

The burden of seeking a stay of execution and a release on bond is upon the applicant. Thus under *Birge,*the trial court should not grant bond pending appeal unless the applicant presents sufficient information, evidence, or argument to convince the trial court that an affirmative response is not appropriate as to any of the *Birge*criteria. Also, the trial court may consider the evidence adduced at trial that is pertinent to this determination. *Williford v. State,*218 Ga. App. 522, 523 (462 SE2d 632). In view of the brief, superficial, and conclusory nature of the evidence presented by defendant at the hearing, consisting primarily of the responses of close family members to leading questions, along with the evidence heard at trial, we find that the trial court’s conclusion that defendant had failed to satisfy his burden was not clearly erroneous. Id. at 524; *Pressel v. State,*161 Ga. App. 488 (287 SE2d 780).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Johnson and Ruffin, JJ, concur.*
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 238 (Tuesday, December 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 63704]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30197]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-60-000]


National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

December 6, 1995.
    Take notice that on November 30, 1995, National Fuel Gas Supply 
Corporation (``National'') tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Thirteenth Revised Sheet No. 5, to be effective January 1, 
1996.
    National states that the proposed tariff sheet reflects an 
adjustment to recover $59,000 through National's EFT rate based on the 
Transportation and Storage Cost Adjustment provision set forth in 
Section 23 of the General Terms and Conditions of National's FERC Gas 
Tariff.
    National further states that copies of this compliance filing were 
served upon the company's jurisdictional customers and the regulatory 
commission's of the States of New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Delaware, 
Massachusetts, and New Jersey.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 214 or 211 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211). Pursuant to Section 
154.210 of the Commission's Regulations, all such motions or protests 
must be filed not later than 12 days after the date of the filing noted 
above. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-30197 Filed 12-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5448 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Union Calendar No. 455
113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5448

                          [Report No. 113-613]

To amend the John F. Kennedy Center Act to authorize appropriations for 
          the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 11, 2014

  Mr. Barletta (for himself and Mr. Carson of Indiana) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

                           November 12, 2014

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the John F. Kennedy Center Act to authorize appropriations for 
          the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``John F. Kennedy Center 
Reauthorization Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 13 of the John F. Kennedy Center Act (20 U.S.C. 76r) is 
amended by striking subsections (a) and (b) and inserting the 
following:
    ``(a) Maintenance, Repair, and Security.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to the Board to carry out section 4(a)(1)(H)--
            ``(1) $22,200,000 for fiscal year 2015;
            ``(2) $23,000,000 for fiscal year 2016;
            ``(3) $24,000,000 for fiscal year 2017;
            ``(4) $26,000,000 for fiscal year 2018; and
            ``(5) $27,000,000 for fiscal year 2019.
    ``(b) Capital Projects.--There is authorized to be appropriated to 
the Board to carry out subparagraphs (F) and (G) of section 4(a)(1)--
            ``(1) $12,200,000 for fiscal year 2015;
            ``(2) $16,000,000 for fiscal year 2016;
            ``(3) $13,000,000 for fiscal year 2017;
            ``(4) $13,000,000 for fiscal year 2018; and
            ``(5) $14,000,000 for fiscal year 2019.''.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 455

113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5448

                          [Report No. 113-613]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To amend the John F. Kennedy Center Act to authorize appropriations for 
          the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 12, 2014

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BAKER 

&

HOSTETLER LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

EXHIBIT A 

NO LIABILITY CAL OES CLAIMS

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5096-1 Filed: 12/12/19 Entered: 12/12/19 15:58:14 Page 1

of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BAKER 

&

HOSTETLER LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

No. Claimant Claims

Number

Claim

Amount

Asserted

Debtor

Reason for 

Disallowance 

1. California 

Governor’s Office 

of Emergency 

Services 

87748 $99,354,738 Pacific Gas 

and Electric 

Company 

No Liability to Cal 

OES. See Objection 

at pp. 6-16. 

2. California 

Governor’s Office 

of Emergency 

Services 

87754 $281,230,590 Pacific Gas 

and Electric 

Company 

No Liability to Cal 

OES. See Objection 

at pp. 6-16. 

3. California 

Governor’s Office 

of Emergency 

Services 

87755 $2,313,479,642 Pacific Gas 

and Electric 

Company 

No Liability to Cal 

OES. See Objection 

at pp. 6-16. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5096-1 Filed: 12/12/19 Entered: 12/12/19 15:58:14 Page 2

of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6181 CLINTON RATLIFF, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus JIM RUBENSTEIN, Commissioner, West Virginia Division of Corrections; EVELYN SEIFERT, Warden, Northern Regional Jail & Correctional Facility; ROBERT KNIGHT, Correctional Officer, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., District Judge. (5:05-cv-00052-FPS) Submitted: June 15, 2006 Decided: J une 20, 2006 Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clinton Ratliff, Appellant Pro Se. Philip Cameron Petty, Stephanie Ann Jones, ROSE PADDEN & PETTY, LC, Fairmont, West Virginia; Charles Patrick Houdyschell, Jr., WEST VIRGINIA DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS, Charleston, West Virginia; David L. Wyant, BAILEY & WYANT, PLLC, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Clinton Ratliff appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985(3), 1986 (2000) as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B); 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that the appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Ratliff v. Rubenstein , No. 5:05-cv-00052-FPS (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 13, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 233 (Tuesday, December 5, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 62294]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-29765]








Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

Time and Date: 11:00 a.m., Monday, December 11, 1995.

Place: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, C Street 
entrance between 20th and 2lst Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered:

    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal 
Reserve System employees.
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced 
meeting.

Contact Person for More Information: Mr. Joseph R. Coyne, Assistant to 
the Board; (202) 452-3204. You may call (202) 452-3207, beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before this meeting, for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting.

    Dated: December 1, 1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 95-29765 Filed 12-1-95; 3:22 pm]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
EX-35.4
(logo) Homecomings Financial
A GMAC Company



SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (Item 1123)

Homecomings Financial, LLC

GSR Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-AR1 (the "Issuing Entity")


The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Homecomings Financial, LLC, as
servicer (the "Servicer"), does hereby certify that:

1. A review of the Servicer's activities during the period covered by the
Issuing Entity's report on Form 10-K and of the Servicer's performance under
the applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in
all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this
17th day of March 2008.

By: /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
Name:   Anthony N. Renzi
Title:  Managing Director
9

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EXHIBIT C
10

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EXPENSE SUMMARY FOR THE PERIOD 

AUGUST 1, 2019 THROUGH AUGUST 31, 2019

Type of Expense Partner Amount 

Airfare Berman $1,798.01

Lodging Berman $ 436.81

Ground Transportation Berman $ 143.21

Total $2,378.03
Exhibit 99.1



Certifications of Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Eric B. Stang, certify that, to the best of my knowledge based upon a review of the Form 10-Q, the Form 10-Q fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act and that information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Lexar Media, Inc. for the periods covered by the Form
10-Q.



|Dated: May 15, 2003 |  | By: |  | /s/    ERIC B. STANG                                    
|------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  |     |  | Eric B. Stang Chief Executive Officer, Lexar Media, Inc.



I,
Michael J. Perez, certify that, to the best of my knowledge based upon a review of the Form 10-Q, the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act and that information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Lexar Media, Inc. for the periods covered by the Form 10-Q.



|Dated: May 15, 2003 |  | By: |  | /s/    MICHAEL J. PEREZ                                                                
|------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  |     |  | Michael J. Perez Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer, Lexar Media, Inc.



A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Lexar Media, Inc. and will be retained by Lexar Media, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PDF FILE WITH AUDIO FILE ATTACHMENT

Page 1 of 1

2019-30088

PG&E Corporation

Case Type : bk

Case Number : 2019-30088

Audio Date\Time: 1/14/2020 11:00:59 AM

Audio File Size :

Audio Run Time :

623 KB

[00:02:36] (hh:mm:ss)

Audio File Name : 3bk2019-30088_1142020-110059-AM.mp3

Case Title : PG&E Corporation

Help using this file:

An audio file is embedded as an attachment in this PDF document. To listen to the file,

click the Attachments tab or the Paper Clip icon. Select the Audio File and click Open.

MPEG Layer-3 audio coding technology from Fraunhofer IIS and Thomson.

This digital recording is a copy of a court proceeding and is provided as 

a convenience to the public. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 753 (b) 

"[n]o transcripts of the proceedings of the court shall be considered as 

official except those made from the records certified by the reporter or 

other individual designated to produce the record."
EXHIBIT 10.11


 


AMENDMENT to WORK ORDER


 


This Amendment
GASOW-STAR100606-00.A.006 to Work Order (‘‘WO”), GASOW-STAR100606-00 effective
as of July 1, 2009 (“Effective Date”), between StarTek, Inc. (“StarTek”),
a Delaware corporation, and AT&T Mobility LLC, (“AT&T”) a Delaware
limited liability company, on behalf of itself and its Affiliates, amends the
work order described below.


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS,
AT&T and StarTek entered into a Master Service Agreement on October 1,
2006 (the “MSA”);


 


WHEREAS AT&T and StarTek
executed Work Order GASOW-STAR100606-00 dated November 30, 2006 (‘‘WO”)
pursuant to the MSA to provide services to AT&T Mobility LLC;


 


WHEREAS
AT&T and StarTek desire to amend the term of the WO;


 


NOW THEREFORE, FOR AND IN
CONSIDERATION of the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties agree
to amend the WO as follows:


 


1.   Section 3. “Term” of the WO
is hereby deleted in its entirety and it is replaced by the following:


 


“3. ‘The Term of this SOW shall
commence on November 30,2006 (“Effective Date”), and shall continue until
midnight on July 31, 2009 (the “Initial Term).  The SOW may be terminated as allowed in the
Agreement or in this SOW.”


 


2.         Except as amended by this
Amendment, the WO is not otherwise modified, revoked or superseded and remains
in full force and effect.


 


3.         This amendment maintains services
pending approval of new work order.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties execute this Amendment as of the Effective Date.


 


	
  StarTek
  Inc.

  	
   

  	
  AT&T
  Mobility LLC by its authorized Representative AT&T Services, Inc.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By: 

  	
  /s/
  A. Laurence Jones

  	
   

  	
  By: 

  	
  /s/
  Karen Tays

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Printed
  Name:

  	
  A. Laurence
  Jones

  	
   

  	
  Printed
  Name:

  	
  Karen
  Tays

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Title:
  

  	
  CEO

  	
   

  	
  Title:
  

  	
  Senior
  Contract Manager

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Date:
  

  	
  6/29/09

  	
   

  	
  Date:
  

  	
  6/29/09

  



 


Proprietary Information


The information contained in this Agreement is not for use or disclosure
outside AT&T, StarTek, their affiliated companies and their third party
representatives, except under written Agreement by the contracting Parties.


 


1