alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# ACTION:

Notice of closed meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the provisions of section 10 of Public Law 92-463, the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is hereby given that a closed meeting of the Department of Defense Wage Committee will be held on June 29, 2010, in Rosslyn, Virginia.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on Tuesday, June 29, 2010, at 10 a.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at 1400 Key Boulevard, Level A, Room A101, Rosslyn, VA 22209.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Additional information concerning the meeting may be obtained by writing to the Chairman, Department of Defense Wage Committee, 4000 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Under the provisions of section 10(d) of Public Law 92-463, the Department of Defense has determined that the meeting meets the criteria to close meetings to the public because the matters to be considered are related to internal rules and practices of the Department of Defense and the detailed wage data to be considered were obtained from officials of private establishments with a guarantee that the data will be held in confidence.

However, members of the public who may wish to do so are invited to submit material in writing to the chairman concerning matters believed to be deserving of the Committee's attention.

Dated: June 2, 2010.

Mitchell S. Bryman,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2010-13547 Filed 6-4-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
#### Henry Bereau v. Daniel O’Connell.

Motion, to vacate order of February 11, 1895, denied.
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)




In connection with the Annual Report of Tiger Oil and Energy, In., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Kenneth B Liebscher, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date: September 19 , 2011/s/ Kenneth B LiebscherKenneth B Liebscher CEO
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

Northern District of California

In re:

Debtor(s)

Bankruptcy No.:

R.S. No.:

Hearing Date:

Time:

Relief From Stay Cover Sheet

Instructions: Complete caption and Section A for all motions. Complete Section B for mobile homes, motor vehicles, and personal property.

Complete Section C for real property. Utilize Section C as necessary. If moving party is not a secured creditor, briefly summarize the nature

of the motion in Section D.

(A) Date Petition Filed: Chapter:

Prior hearings on this obligation: Last Day to File §523/§727 Complaints:

(B) Description of personal property collateral (e.g. 1983 Ford Taurus):

 Secured Creditor [ ] or lessor [ ]

 Fair market value: $________________ Source of value:__________________

 Contract Balance: $________________ Pre-Petition Default: $_______________

 Monthly Payment: $________________ No. of months: ___________

 Insurance Advance: $________________ Post-Petition Default: $_______________

No. of months: ___________

 (C) Description of real property collateral (e.g. Single family residence, Oakland, CA):

Fair market value: $_______________ Source of value:_______________ If appraisal, date:___________

Moving Party's position (first trust deed, second, abstract, etc.):

Approx. Bal. $_______________ Pre-Petition Default: $_______________

As of (date): _______________ No. of months: ____________

Mo. payment: $_______________ Post-Petition Default: $_______________

Notice of Default (date): __________ No. of months: ____________

Notice of Trustee's Sale: __________ Advances Senior Liens: $_______________

Specify name and status of other liens and encumbrances, if known (e.g. trust deeds, tax liens, etc.):

Position Amount Mo. Payment Defaults

1

st Trust Deed:_____________________ $_______________ $_______________ $_______________ 

2

nd Trust Deed: ____________________ $_______________ $_______________ $_______________

_________________________________:

_________________________________:

_________________________________:

(Total) $_______________ $_______________ $_______________

(D) Other pertinent information:


______________________________________

Signature

______________________________________

Print or Type Name

Attorney for___________________________________

CANB Documents Northern District of California 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 486 Filed: 02/19/19 Entered: 02/19/19 18:33:51 Page 1 of 1
#### Bernard M. Douglas and Another, Suing on Their Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated as Manufacturers of Roquefort Cheese, Plaintiffs, *v.*Mod-Urn Cheese Packing Company, Inc., and Others, Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

June 10, 1936.

*22*Frank, Weil & Strouse [Samuel F. Frank*of counsel], for the plaintiffs.

*Benjamin S. Shaw,*for the defendants.

Collins, J.

As indicated on the trial, I am of the opinion that the plaintiff is entitled to the relief prayed for. To permit the defendants to continue to market its cheese as genuine Roquefort would not only be allowing them to enrich themselves at the plaintiff’s expense, but it would be an imposition upon the cheese-purchasing public. A buyer of Roquefort cheese naturally assumes that he is receiving the cheese made in the Roquefort, France, district, in accordance with the peculiar process there employed. Thus, *“*Roquefort ” has acquired a secondary meaning. No one should object to his product being sold on its own merits; he should be scrupulous not to mislead. The true ingredients of a product should be made known so that the public will be informed concerning the article it is getting. *(Coty, Inc.,*v. *Blume, Inc.,*24 F. [2d] 924, 925.) A name or description should not be used if it misrepresents or misleads or tells a half-truth. *(Standard Oil Co.*v. *California Peach & Fig Growers,*28 F. [2d] 283, 286.) To prevent fraud upon the public who do not make fine distinctions *(Bengue*v. *American Pharmaceutical Co., Inc.,*155 Misc. 502), the defendants will be restrained *(McIlhenny Co.*v. *Bulliard,*33 F. [2d] 978). Judgment for plaintiff. Findings and conclusions passed upon. Submit decision accordingly.
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Stakool, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the three month period ending September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kyle Gotshalk, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and   (2)The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: March 30, 2010By:/s/ Kyle GotshalkKyle GotshalkPrincipal Executive Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 21, 2016

d1214

Order 

Clerk

December 21, 2016

154065

SUSAN R. BANK,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 154065

COA: 326668

Oakland CC: 2014-139221-CL

MICHIGAN EDUCATION ASSOCIATION- NEA and NOVI EDUCATION

ASSOCIATION MEA-NEA,

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 26, 2016 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report of UTEC, Inc., a Nevada corporation
(the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “Report”), I, Howard Bouch, CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date: March 5, 2012



|/s/ Howard Bouch | 
|---------------- | 
|Howard Bouch CEO
#### Michael Helwig, Respondent, v. William Buckholz, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.;

Dykman. J., not sitting.
EXHIBIT 32.2

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

I, Edwin F. Heinen, Chief Financial Officer of Glowpoint, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)

The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 14, 2008

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ Edwin F. Heinen    
| | Edwin F. Heinen        
| | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Glowpoint, Inc. and will be retained by Glowpoint, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 236 (Friday, December 8, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 63023-63024]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-29909]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

48 CFR Part 15


Federal Acquisition Regulation; Contracting by Negotiation (FAR 
Part 15 Rewrite)

AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD).

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Director of Defense Procurement, in concert with the 
Federal Acquisition Regulations Council, is sponsoring an initiative to 
rewrite the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 15, Contracting 
by Negotiation. The intent is to make Part 15 easier to understand and 
to eliminate policies, procedures, or requirements that impose 
unnecessary burdens on contractors or contracting officers. Regulatory 
requirements that are not required by statute, required to ensure 
adequately standardized government business practices, or required to 
protect the public interest will be considered for elimination. 
Innovative means of simplifying the procurement process and enhancing 
its efficiency will be considered for incorporation into the 
regulation. The rewrite team will use a number of fora to facilitate 
the exchange of ideas and information. Comments are solicited from both 
government and industry personnel, and notices of public meetings will 
be published in the Federal Register. To initiate the rewrite effort, 
interested parties are invited to present statements or provide 
suggestions on how to improve FAR Part 15 at a public meeting.

DATES: Public Meeting: A public meeting will be conducted at the 
address shown below from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m., Eastern standard time, on 
January 23, 1996.
    Statements: Statements from interested parties for presentation at 
the public meeting should be submitted to the address below on or 
before January 16, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Public Meeting: The location of the public meeting is the 
General Services Administration auditorium, 18th and F Streets NW., 
Washington, D.C. 20405. Individuals wishing to attend the meeting, 
including individuals wishing to make presentations on the topic 
scheduled for discussion should contact the Part 15 Rewrite Committee 
Chair, Ms. Melissa 

[[Page 63024]]
Rider, DAR Council, Attn: IMD 3D139, PDUSD (A&T) DP/DAR, 3062 Defense 
Pentagon, Washington, D.C. 20301-3062.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. Melissa Rider, telephone (703) 602-0131. FAX (703) 602-0350.
Michele P. Peterson,
Executive Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations Council.
[FR Doc. 95-29909 Filed 12-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
Exhibit 32.1

Certifications

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned officer of Keystone Automotive Operations, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended September 30, 2006 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |     |  |                                                        
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 13, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ EDWARD H. ORZETTI                                  
|                        |  |     |  | Edward H. Orzetti Chief Executive Officer and
President

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 and is not being filed as
part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 235 (Thursday, December 7, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 62806]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-29773]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

48 CFR Part 9

[FAR Case 95-007 Correction]


Federal Acquisition Regulation; Corrections

AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DOD), General Services Administration 
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense 
Acquisition Regulations Council are issuing a correction to FAR case 
95-007, Responsibility Determinations, published at 60 FR 55960, 
November 3, 1995. The correction reflects the changes implemented by 
Federal Acquisition Circular 90-32, FAR case 94-790, Acquisition of 
Commercial Items, Item III.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FAR Secretariat, Room 4037, GS 
Building, Washington, DC 20405, (202) 501-4755. Please cite correction 
to FAR case 95-007.

Correction

PART 9--CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS

    In proposed rule document 95-27294 on page 55960 in the issue of 
Friday, November 3, 1995, in the third column, under amendatory 
instruction 3, the revised text should read as follows:


9.106-1  Conditions of preaward surveys.

    (a) A preaward survey is normally required only when the 
information on hand or readily available to the contracting officer, 
including information from commercial sources, is not sufficient to 
make a determination regarding responsibility. However, if the 
contemplated contract will have a fixed price at or below the 
simplified acquisition threshold or will involve the acquisition of 
commercial items (see part 12), the contracting officer should not 
request a preaward survey unless circumstances justify its cost.
* * * * *
    Dated: December 1, 1995.
Edward C. Loeb,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Acquisition Policy.
[FR Doc. 95-29773 Filed 12-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-M
No. 1280, Misc.

Petitioner *pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg*and *Kirby W. Patterson*for the United States.

#### Castano *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 104 (Tuesday, June 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30459-30460]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13066]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7032]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Dynasty and Divinity: Ife Art in Ancient Nigeria''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et

[[Page 30460]]

seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation 
of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of 
Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine 
that the objects to be included in the exhibition ``Dynasty and 
Divinity: Ife Art in Ancient Nigeria,'' imported from abroad for 
temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural 
significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with 
the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or 
display of the exhibit objects at the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston, TX, 
from on or about September 19, 2010, until on or about January 9, 2011; 
at the Virginia Museum of Fine Arts, Richmond, VA, from on or about 
February 19, 2011, until on or about May 22, 2011; at the Indianapolis 
Museum of Art, Indianapolis, IN, from on or about July 10, 2011, until 
on or about October 9, 2011; at the Museum for African Art, New York, 
NY, from on or about November 11, 2011, until on or about March 4, 
2012, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be 
determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these 
Determinations is ordered to be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202/632-6473). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-
5, L/PD, Fifth Floor, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: May 21, 2010.
Maura M. Pally,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-13066 Filed 5-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
Project Category and Billing Category Hours

PG&E Corporation, et al. (Case No. 19-30088 (DM))

For the Period October 1, 2019 through October 31, 2019

Summary by Project Category and Billing Category

Total 

Compensation

Exhibit A

PwC LLP - Management, Tax and Advisory Consultants to the Debtors

Fixed Fee Services

North Bay & Camp Fire Services Retention Exhibit #: SUPP 01-C; 01-F

North Bay & Camp Fire Services - C.O. #12 & C.O. #3 1,862.30 $668,333.00

Subtotal - North Bay & Camp Fire Services 1,862.30 $668,333.00

Compliance Services Retention Exhibit #: 01-H

Compliance Services 530.50 $190,500.00

Subtotal - Compliance Services 530.50 $190,500.00

Subtotal - Hours and Compensation - Fixed Fee Services 2,392.80 $858,833.00

Hourly Services

Rate Case Support Services Retention Exhibit #: 01-L; SUPP 01-J

Rate Case Support Services 173.60 $68,992.00

Subtotal - Rate Case Support Services 173.60 $68,992.00

Bankruptcy Tax Advisory Services Retention Exhibit #: 05

Tax Services 450.80 $278,904.00

Subtotal - Bankruptcy Tax Advisory Services 450.80 $278,904.00

Subtotal - Hours and Compensation - Hourly Services 624.40 $347,896.00

Case Administration

Retention Exhibit #: CASE

11.10 $6,105.00

7.50 $4,125.00

Bankruptcy Requirements and Other Court Obligations

Employment Applications and Other Court Filings

Monthly, Interim and Final Fee Applications

Subtotal - Bankruptcy Requirements and Other Court Obligations 18.60 $10,230.00

Subtotal - Hours and Compensation - Case Administration 18.60 $10,230.00

Total - Hours and Compensation Sought for Reimbursement 3,035.80 $1,216,959.00

Monday, December 30, 2019

Page 1 of 1

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5231-1 Filed: 12/31/19 Entered: 12/31/19 09:57:55 Page 1

of 1