64056 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 239 / Wednesday, December 13, 1995 / Notices

6L71TA. (The 1990 model year DDC

6L71TA has a pre-rebuild PM level of

0.59 g/bhp-hr.) While TRT requests

certification coverage for the 1990 DDC

6L71TA and warrants comparable

particulate emissions reduction

percentages for it as is demonstrated by

the 6V71N test engine, the requirement

of the program regulations have not

been met. Therefore, the Agency

believes that the notification lacks

sufficient basis for certification of the

candidate equipment with the 1990

DDC 6L71TA.

Section 85.1406(d) of the regulations

governing urban bus equipment

certification states, in part, ‘‘* * *

installation of any certified retrofit/

rebuild equipment shall not cause or

contribute to an unreasonable risk to the

public health, welfare or safety * * *’’.

Information for considering whether

B20 in this context would affect any

potential human health risks associated

with exposure to conventional diesel

emissions has been provided by TRT

with its notification of intent to certify.

This information will be reviewed by

the Agency. The Agency has made this

information part of the public docket at

the address listed above. Any findings

based on this information, together with

any other information that may be

considered, will be made part of the

public docket located at the address

noted above, and considered by the

Agency in its decision regarding

certification of the candidate

equipment. The Agency requests

additional information, including

information on combustion by-products,

for considering whether and, if so how,

the use of the subject biodiesel blend,

that is, B20, in diesel engines would

affect any potential health risks

associated with exposure to

conventional diesel emissions.

Section 211 of the Clean Air Act sets

forth fuel and fuel additive prohibitions,

and gives the Agency authority to waive

certain of those prohibitions. The

Agency, however, does not believe that

TRT must obtain a fuel additive waiver

under Section 211(f)(4) of the Clean Air

Act before certifying its additive system

for the following reasons.

The Act prohibits the introduction

into commerce of any fuel or fuel

additive that is not substantially similar

to a fuel or fuel additive used in the

certification of any model year 1975 or

later vehicle or engine under Section

206. The Administrator may waive this

prohibition, if she determines that

certain criteria are met. The Agency

believes that certification of an urban

bus retrofit system constitutes the

certification of an engine under Section

206 for the purposes of the urban bus

retrofit/rebuild program, and, since the

additive is used in the certification of

the system, a waiver is not required to

market the additive in the limited

context of use with the certified retrofit

system. This determination does not

affect whether the additive is

‘‘substantially similar to any fuel or fuel

additive’’ outside the context of the

urban bus retrofit/rebuild program. The

Agency’s position on this matter is

discussed in additional detail as it

relates to use of another fuel additive

(Lubrizol Corporation) at 60 FR 36139

on July 13, 1995.

If the Agency certifies the candidate

TRT equipment, operators may use it

immediately, as discussed below. TRT’s

notification indicates that the candidate

equipment is to be certified for

compliance program 2; however, as

discussed below, the Agency believes

that configurations utilizing the

catalytic muffler and reducing PM by at

least 25 percent may also be used in

compliance with current program 1

requirements.

In a Federal Register notice dated

May 31, 1995 (60 FR 28402), the Agency

certified an exhaust catalyst

manufactured by the Engelhard

Corporation, as a trigger of program

requirements. For urban bus operators

affected by this program and electing to

comply with program 1 requirements,

that certification means that rebuilds

and replacements of all applicable

urban bus engines, performed 6 months

or more after that date of certification

(that is, rebuilds or replacements after

December 1, 1995), must be performed

with equipment certified to reduce PM

emissions by 25 percent or more. Under

Program 1, operators could use the TRT

equipment if certified to reduce PM by

at least 25 percent, or other equipment

certified to provide at least a 25 percent

reduction, until equipment is certified

which triggers the 0.10 g/bhp-hr PM

standard. For Program 1, operators may

also use the B20 blend with the

Engelhard catalyst and injection retard

only for the following engines: 6V92TA

DDEC I and DDEC II, and 6L71TA

DDEC.

Operators who choose to comply with

Program 2 and install the TRT

equipment, would use the PM emission

level(s) established during the

certification process, in their

calculations for target or fleet level as

specified in the program regulations.

In accordance with the program

requirements of section 85.1404(a),

operators using the candidate

equipment would have to maintain

purchase records of the B20 blend if the

operator purchases the premixed blend

from a fuel supplier, or, of biodiesel and

low-sulfur diesel fuel if the operator

mixes the B20. Such records would be

subject to review in the event of an

audit of a urban bus operator by the

Agency. To be in compliance with

program requirements, operators must

be able to demonstrate that B20 is being

used in the proper proportions required

by the candidate equipment.

At a minimum, EPA expects to

evaluate this notification of intent to

certify, and other materials submitted as

applicable, to determine whether there

is adequate demonstration of

compliance with: (1) The certification

requirements of § 85.1406, including

whether the testing accurately

substantiates the claimed emission

reduction or emission levels; and, (2)

the requirements of § 85.1407 for a

notification of intent to certify.

The Agency requests that those

commenting also consider these

regulatory requirements, plus provide

comments on any experience or

knowledge concerning: (a) problems

with installing, maintaining, and/or

using the candidate equipment on

applicable engines; and, (b) whether the

equipment is compatible with affected

vehicles.

The date of this notice initiates a 45-

day period during which the Agency

will accept written comments relevant

to whether or not the equipment

described in the TRT notification of

intent to certify should be certified

pursuant to the urban bus retrofit/

rebuild regulations. Interested parties

are encouraged to review the

notification of intent to certify and

provide comment during the 45-day

period. Please send separate copies of

your comments to each of the above two

addresses.

The Agency will review this

notification of intent to certify, along

with comments received from interested

parties, and attempt to resolve or clarify

issues as necessary. During the review

process, the Agency may add additional

documents to the docket as a result of

the review process. These documents

will also be available for public review

and comment within the 45-day period.

Dated: December 1, 1995.

Mary D. Nichols,

Assistant Administrator for Air and

Radiation.

[FR Doc. 95–30405 Filed 12–12–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50-P

[OPP–180985; FRL–4988–6]

Emergency Exemptions

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 239 / Wednesday, December 13, 1995 / Notices 64057

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: EPA has granted specific

exemptions for the control of various

pests to the 22 States as listed below.

Crisis exemptions were initiated by

various States, United States

Departments of Agriculture, Animal and

Plant Health Inspection Service, and the

United States Department of the Army.

One quarantine exemption was granted

to the United States Department of

Agriculture. These exemptions, issued

during the months of June, July, August,

and September 1995, except for the one

in March and one in April, are subject

to application and timing restrictions

and reporting requirements designed to

protect the environment to the

maximum extent possible. EPA has

denied a specific exemption request

from the Oregon Department of

Agriculture and has withdrawn a

specific exemption from the

Connecticut Department of

Environmental Protection. Information

on these restrictions is available from

the contact persons in EPA listed below.

DATES: See each specific and crisis

exemption for its effective date.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: See

each emergency exemption for the name

of the contact person. The following

information applies to all contact

persons: By mail: Registration Division

(7505W), Office of Pesticide Programs,

Environmental Protection Agency, 401

M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460.

Office location and telephone number:

6th Floor, CS #1, 2800 Jefferson Davis

Highway, Arlington, VA, (703)–308–

8417; e-mail:

group.ermus@epamail.epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has

granted specific, crisis, and quarantine

exemptions to the:

1. Arizona Department of Agriculture

for the use of avermectin B1 on melons

to control leafminers; June 30, 1995, to

June 29, 1996. (Larry Fried)

2. Arizona Department of Agriculture

for the use of bifenthrin on cauliflower

and leaf lettuce to control whiteflies;

September 28, 1995, to May 15, 1996.

(Andrea Beard)

3. Arkansas State Plant Board for the

use of fomesafen on snap beans to

control moringglory and pigweed; June

2, 1995, to September 10, 1995. (Larry

Fried)

4. California Environmental

Protection Agency for the use of

carbofuran on cotton to control aphids;

August 22, 1995, to October 15, 1995.

(David Deegan)

5. California Environmental

Protection Agency, Department of

Pesticide Regulations, for the use of ProGro (carboxin/thiram) on onion seed to

control onion smut; September 11, 1995,

to May 31, 1996. (Andrea Beard)

6. California Environmental

Protection Agency, Department of

Pesticide Regulations, for the use of

myclobutanil on tomatoes to control

powdery mildew; September 29, 1995,

to June 16, 1996. California had initiated

a crisis exemption for this use. (David

Deegan)

7. California Environmental

Protection Agency for the use of

avermectin B1 on melons to control

leafminers; June 30, 1995, to November

1, 1995. (Larry Fried)

8. California Environmental

Protection Agency for the use of

avermectin B1 on bell peppers to control

leafminers; August 24, 1995, to August

23, 1996. (Larry Fried)

9. California Environmental

Protection Agency for the use of

cypermethrin on green onions to control

thrips; June 15, 1995, to June 14, 1996.

(Larry Fried)

10. California Environmental

Protection Agency, Department of

Pesticide Regulations, for the use of

metalaxyl on mustard greens to control

white rust; August 21, 1995, to August

20, 1996. (David Deegan)

11. Florida Department of Agriculture

and Consumer Services for the use of

imidacloprid on escarole, endives,

spinach, and parsley to control aphids;

September 29, 1995, to June 1, 1996.

Florida had initiated a crisis exemption

for this use. (Andrea Beard)

12. Florida Department of Agriculture

and Consumer Services for the use of

lactofen on tomatoes and green peppers

to control nightshade; September 1,

1995, to August 31, 1996. A notice of

receipt published in the Federal

Register of July 26, 1995 (60 FR 38335).

The use of lactofen has been requested

for the past 4 years and was granted. A

complete application for registration of

the use has not yet been submitted to

the Agency. The Florida tomato and

green pepper growers are facing an

urgent nonroutine situation and will

suffer significant economic losses

without the use of lactofen. (Margarita

Collantes)

13. Idaho Department of Agriculture

and Consumer Services for the use of

pirimicarb on alfalfa grown for seed to

control alfalfa aphids, pea aphids, and

lygus bugs; June 16, 1995, to August 31,

1995. (Larry Fried)

14. Kansas Department of Agriculture

for the use of cymoxanil,

dimethomorph, and propamocarb

hydrochloride on potatoes to control

late blight; June 27, 1995, to September

30, 1995. (Libby Pemberton)

15. Maryland Department of

Agriculture for the use of clomazone on

snap beans to control broadleaf weeds;

August 9, 1995, to September 10, 1995.

(David Deegan)

16. Maryland Department of

Agriculture for the use of clomazone on

summer squash to control broadleaf

weeds; August 9, 1995, to September 30,

1995. Maryland had initiated a crisis

exemption for this use. (David Deegan)

17. Maryland Department of

Agriculture for the use of metolachlor

on spinach to control weeds; August 2,

1995, to May 1, 1996. (Margarita

Collantes)

18. Michigan Department of

Agriculture for the use of fomesafen on

dry beans to control weeds; June 28,

1995, to August 15, 1995. (Larry Fried)

19. Michigan Department of

Agriculture for the use of avermectin on

pears to control mites and psylla;

September 5, 1995, to September 30,

1995. Michigan had initiated a crisis

exemption for this use. (Larry Fried)

20. Minnesota Department of

Agriculture for the use of bentazon on

peas to control Canada thistle; June 23,

1995, to July 15, 1995. (Larry Fried)

21. Mississippi Department of

Agriculture and Commerce for the use

of carbofuran on cotton to control

aphids; June 30, 1995, to September 15,

1995. (David Deegan)

22. Montana Department of

Agriculture for the use of pirimicarb on

alfalfa grown for seed to control alfalfa

aphids, pea aphids, and lygus bugs; June

16, 1995, to September 30, 1995. (Larry

Fried)

23. Nebraska Department of

Agriculture for the use of cymoxanil,

dimethomorph, and propamocarb

hydrochloride on potatoes to control

late blight; September 6, 1995, to

September 30, 1995. (Libby Pemberton)

24. Nevada Division of Agriculture for

the use of cymoxanil, dimethomorph,

and propamocarb hydrochloride on

potatoes to control late blight; August

15, 1995, to September 15, 1995. (Libby

Pemberton)

25. Nevada Department of Business

and Industry for the use of pirimicarb

on alfalfa grown for seed to control

alfalfa aphids and blue alfalfa aphids;

June 16, 1995, to August 31, 1995.

(Larry Fried)

26. New Jersey Department of

Environmental Protection for the use of

metolachlor on spinach to control

weeds; August 2, 1995, to November 1,

1995. New Jersey had initiated a crisis

exemption for this use. (Margarita

Collantes)

27. Ohio Department of Agriculture

for the use of cypermethrin on green
64058 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 239 / Wednesday, December 13, 1995 / Notices

onions to control thrips; June 15, 1995,

to June 30, 1995. (Larry Fried)

28. Oklahoma Department of

Agriculture for the use of fomesafen on

snap beans to control morningglory and

pigweed; June 2, 1995, to September 10,

1995. (Larry Fried)

29. Oklahoma Department of

Agriculture for the use of carbofuran on

cotton to control aphids; June 29, 1995,

to October 15, 1995. (David Deegan)

30. Oklahoma Department of

Agriculture for the use of metolachlor

on spinach to control weeds; August 2,

1995, to March 31, 1996. (Margarita

Collantes)

31. Oregon Department of Agriculture

for the use of metolachlor on grasses

grown for seed to control weeds; August

31, 1995, to November 15, 1995. (David

Deegan)

32. Oregon Department of Agriculture

for the use of oxyfluorfen on grasses

grown for seed to control weeds; August

31, 1995, to January 15, 1996. (David

Deegan)

33. Oregon Department of Agriculture

for the use of pronamide on grasses

grown for seed to control weeds; August

31, 1995, to January 20, 1996. (David

Deegan)

34. Oregon Department of Agriculture

for the use of lactofen on snap beans to

control weeds; April 28, 1995, to July

31, 1995. (Larry Fried)

35. Oregon Department of Agriculture

for the use of pirimicarb on alfalfa

grown for seed to control alfalfa aphids,

pea aphids, and lygus bugs; June 16,

1995, to September 1, 1995. (Larry

Fried)

36. Pennsylvania Department of

Agriculture for the use of fomesafen on

snap beans to control weeds; June 30,

1995, to August 15, 1995. Pennsylvania

had initiated a crisis exemption for this

use. (Larry Fried)

37. Texas Department of Agriculture

for the use of carbofuran on cotton to

control aphids; June 9, 1995, to

September 30, 1995. (David Deegan)

38. Texas Department of Agriculture

for the use of metolachlor on spinach to

control weeds; August 2, 1995, to

August 15, 1996. (Margarita Collantes)

39. Virginia Department of

Agriculture and Consumer Services for

the use of clomazone on snap beans to

control broadleaf weeds; August 9,

1995, to September 10, 1995. (David

Deegan)

40. Virginia Department of

Agriculture and Consumer Services for

the use of clomazone on summer squash

to control broadleaf weeds; August 9,

1995, to September 30, 1995. (David

Deegan)

41. Washington Department of

Agriculture for the use of pirimicarb on

small seeded vegetable seed crops to

control aphids; June 30, 1995, to

September 15, 1995. (Larry Fried)

42. Washington Department of

Agriculture for the use of pirimicarb on

alfalfa grown for seed to control alfalfa

aphids, pea aphids, and lygus bugs; June

16, 1995, to August 31, 1995. (Larry

Fried)

43. Wyoming Department of

Agriculture for the use of pirimicarb on

alfalfa grown for seed to control alfalfa

aphids, pea aphids, and lygus bugs; June

16, 1995, to August 31, 1995. (Larry

Fried)

Crisis exemptions were initiated by

the:

1. California Environmental

Protection Agency, Department of

Pesticide Regulation, on June 19, 1995,

for the use of myclobutanil on tomatoes

(fresh and processed) to control

powdery mildew. The State requested a

specific exemption for this use, which

was granted by EPA on September 29,

1995, and will expire on June 16, 1996.

(David Deegan)

2. Colorado Department of Agriculture

on August 15, 1995, for the use of

cypermethrin on green onions to control

thrips. This program has ended. (Libby

Pemberton)

3. Florida Department of Agriculture

and Consumer Services on July 23,

1995, for the use of naled on utility

poles, tree trunks, and other inanimate

objects to control the oriental fruit fly.

Since it was anticipated that this

program would be needed for more than

15 days, Florida has requested a

quarantine exemption to continue it.

(Andrea Beard)

4. Maryland Department of

Agriculture on July 31, 1995, for the use

of clomazone on summer squash to

control broadleaf weeds. This program

has ended. (David Deegan)

5. Michigan Department of

Agriculture on August 17, 1995, for the

use of fosetyl-al on blueberries to

control alternaria fruit rot. Since it was

anticipated that this program would be

needed for more than 15 days, Michigan

has requested a specific exemption to

continue it. (Larry Fried)

6. Minnesota Department of

Agriculture on June 16, 1995, for the use

of clopyralid on canola to control

Canada thistle and perennial sowthistle.

This program has ended. (Larry Fried)

7. Missouri Department of Agriculture

on June 13, 1995, for the use of

fomesafen on snap beans to control pig

weed. This program has ended. (Larry

Fried)

8. Montana Department of Agriculture

on June 21, 1995, for the use of

clopyralid on canola to control Canada

thistle and perennial sowthistle. This

program has ended. (Larry Fried)

9. New Jersey Department of

Agriculture on March 23, 1995, for the

use of metolachlor on spinach to control

weeds. This program has ended.

(Margarita Collantes)

10. New Mexico Department of

Agriculture on September 2, 1995, for

the use of triadimefon on peppers to

control powdery mildew. This program

has ended. (Larry Fried)

11. North Carolina Department of

Agriculture on September 1, 1995, for

the use of tebufenozide on cotton to

control the beet armyworms. This

program has ended. (Larry Fried)

12. North Dakota Department of

Agriculture on August 1, 1995, for the

use of bifenthrin on canola to control

the Bertha armyworm. This program has

ended. (Andrea Beard)

13. North Dakota Department of

Agriculture on June 17, 1995, for the use

of clopyralid on canola to control

Canada thistle and perennial sowthistle.

This program has ended. (Larry Fried)

14. Oklahoma Department of

Agriculture on September 1, 1995, for

the use of tebufenozide on cotton to

control beet armyworms. This program

has ended. (Larry Fried)

15. Texas Department of Agriculture

on August 31, 1995, for the use of

bifenthrin on grain sorghum grown for

seed to control banks grass mites. This

program has ended. (Andrea Beard)

16. Texas Department of Agriculture

on June 2, 1995, for the use of

esfenvalerate on grain sorghum to

control sorghum midge. This program

has ended. (Libby Pemberton)

17. Virginia Department of

Agriculture and Consumer Services on

August 28, 1995, for the use of

bifenthrin on peanuts to control twospotted spider mites. This program has

ended. (Andrea Beard)

18. Wisconsin Department of

Agriculture on July 21, 1995, for the use

of bentazon on peas to control weeds.

This program has ended. (Larry Fried)

19. United States Department of

Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health

Inspection Service, on June 6, 1995, for

the use of paraformaldehyde in

laboratory facilities to control exotic

infectious diseases. The need for this

program is expected to last until June 6,

1998. (Larry Fried)

20. United States Department of

Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health

Inspection Service, on August 24, 1995,

for the use of permethrin on horses and

cattle to control nonindigenous

parasites. The need for this program is

expected to last until August 24, 1998.

(Larry Fried)
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 239 / Wednesday, December 13, 1995 / Notices 64059

21. United States Department of the

Army on August 4, 1995, for the use of

paraformaldehyde to decontaminate

high-security biocontaminent

laboratories of microorganisms. This

program has ended. (Larry Fried)

EPA has granted a quarantine

exemption to the United States

Department of Agriculture for the use of

paraformaldehyde in laboratories to

control infectious diseases; September

29, 1995, to June 5, 1998. UDSA had

initiated a crisis exemption for this use.

(Larry Fried)

EPA has denied a specific exemption

request from the Oregon Department of

Agriculture for the use of pendimethalin

on grasses grown for seed. Oregon

requested use of metolachlor for the

same spectrum of weeds, and due to

endangered species concerns with

pendimethalin, the Agency denied the

exemption. (David Deegan)

EPA has withdrawn a specific

exemption from the Connecticut

Department of Environmental Protection

for the use of avermectin on pears to

control pear psylla. Connecticut had

initiated a crisis exemption for this use.

The use of avermectin ended under the

crisis exemption on September 30, 1995.

(Larry Fried)

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136.

List of Subjects

Environmental protection, Pesticides

and pests, Crisis exemptions.

Dated: November 30, 1995.

Stephen L. Johnson,

Director, Registration Division, Office of

Pesticide Programs.

[FR Doc. 95–30114 Filed 12–12–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–F

[PF–636; FRL–4971–5]

Pesticide Tolerance Petitions; Filings,

Amendment, and a Withdrawal

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: This notice announces initial

filings and an amendment and a

withdrawal of pesticide petitions (PP)

and food and feed additive petitions

(FAP) proposing the establishment of

regulations for residues of certain

pesticide chemicals in or on various

agricultural commodities.

ADDRESSES: By mail, submit written

comments to: Public Response and

Program Resources Branch, Field

Operations Division (7506C), Office of

Pesticide Programs, Environmental

Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW.,

Washington, DC 20460. In person, bring

comments to: Rm. 1132, CM #2, 1921

Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA

22202.

Information submitted as a comment

concerning this notice may be claimed

confidential by marking any part or all

of that information as ‘‘Confidential

Business Information’’ (CBI).

Information so marked will not be

disclosed except in accordance with

procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.

A copy of the comment that does not

contain CBI must be submitted for

inclusion in the public record.

Information not marked confidential

may be disclosed publicly by EPA

without prior notice. All written

comments will be available for public

inspection in Rm. 1132 at the address

given above, from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,

Monday through Friday, excluding legal

holidays.

Comments and data may also be

submitted electronically by sending

electronic mail (e-mail) to: oppdocket@epamail.epa.gov. Electronic

comments must be submitted as an

ASCII file avoiding the use of special

characters and any form of encryption.

Comments and data will also be

accepted on disks in WordPerfect in 5.1

file format or ASCII file format. All

comments and data in electronic form

must be identified by the docket number

[PF-636]. No Confidential Business

Information (CBI) should be submitted

through e-mail. Electronic comments on

this document may be filed online at

many Federal Depository Libraries.

Additional information on electronic

submissions can be found below in this

document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By

mail: Registration Division (7505C),

Office of Pesticide Programs,

Environmental Protection Agency, 401

M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. In

person, contact the PM named in each

petition at the following office location/

telephone number:

Product Manager

Office location/

telephone number/e-mailAddress

George

LaRocca (PM

13).

Rm. 204, CM

#2, 703-305-

6100; e-mail:

larocca.

george @

epamail. epa.

gov..

1921

Jefferson

Davis

Hwy.,

Arlington,

VA

Product Manager

Office location/

telephone number/e-mailAddress

Connie Welch

(PM 21).

Rm. 227, CM

#2, 703- 305-

6226; e-mail:

welch. connie

@ epamail.

epa. gov..

Do.

Phillip Hutton

(PM 90).

5th Floor, CS

#1, 703-308-

8260; e-mail:

hutton. phillip

@ epamail.

epa. gov..

2800

Jefferson

Davis

Hwy.,

Arlington,

VA

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has

received pesticide petitions and food/

feed additive petitions as follows

proposing the amendment of regulations

for residues of certain pesticide

chemicals in or on various agricultural

commodities.

Initial Filings

1. PP 5F4509. Lakeshore Enterprises,

P.O. Box 238-P, Benzonia, MI 49616,

has submitted the petition proposing

that 40 CFR part 180 be amended to

establish an exemption from the

requirement of a tolerance for the

biochemicals meat meal and red pepper

(capsicum) in or on agricultural,

vegetable, ornamental, turf, tree, vine,

and other terrestrial crops. (PM 90)

2. PP 5F4588. Zeneca Ag Products,

1800 Concord Pike, P.O. Box 15458, has

submitted the petition proposing to

amend 40 CFR part 180 to establish

tolerances for lambda-cyhalothrin, (S)-

alpha-cyano-3-phenoxybenzyl (Z)-(1R,-

3R)-3-(2-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-

enyl)-2,2-

dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate and

(R)-alpha-cyano-3-phenoxybenzyl (Z)-

(1S,3S)-3-(2-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoroprop1-enyl)-2,2-

dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate, and

epimer of lambda-cyhalothrin, a 1:1

mixture of (S)-alpha-cyano-3-

phenoxybenzyl (Z)-(1S,-3S)-3-(2-chloro3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-enyl)-2,2-

dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate and

(R)-alpha-cyano-3-phenoxybenzyl (Z)-

(1R,3R)-3-(2-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoroprop1-enyl)-2,2-

dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate, in or

on the following raw agricultural

commodities: lettuce, leaf at 2.0 parts

per million (ppm); head and stem

brassica crop subgroup (broccoli;

broccoli, Chinese; brussels sprouts;

cabbage; cabbage, Chinese (napa);

cabbage, Chinese mustard; cauliflower;

caval broccolo; and kohlrabi) at 0.4