alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATIONS**




I,
      Andrew
      Leszczynski, certify that:




1.
      I have
      reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to
      be
      filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of SACO
      I
      Trust 2006-12 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);




2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not
      contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
      fact
      necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
      which
      such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
      by
      this report;




3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information
      required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report
      is
      included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;




4.
      I am
      responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based
      on
      my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer
      compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation
      AB,
      and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers
      have
      fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements; and




5.
      All of
      the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
      securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance
      with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included
      in
      this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act
      Rules
      13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as
      otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
      described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
      10-K.




In
      giving
      the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided
      to me
      by the following unaffiliated parties: EMC Mortgage Corporation, as servicer;
      LandAmerica Tax and Flood Services, Inc., as vendor; American Security Insurance
      Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company, and Safeco Financial Institution
      Solutions, Inc. (affiliates of Assurant Inc.), each as vendor; GMAC Mortgage,
      LLC, as servicer; GMAC Bank, as vendor; and GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc.,
      as servicer.




Date:
      March 29, 2007




LaSalle
      Bank National Association, as Master Servicer




/s/
      Andrew Leszczynski


Andrew
      Leszczynski


First
      Vice President
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5210 Filed: 12/27/19 Entered: 12/27/19 08:57:30 Page 1 of

5
Exhibit A

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5210 Filed: 12/27/19 Entered: 12/27/19 08:57:30 Page 2 of

5
Exhibit A

Notice Parties Service List

Served via first class mail

NAME NOTICE NAME ADDRESS 1 ADDRESS 2 ADDRESS 3 C

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP Michael S. Stamer One Bryant Park New Y

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP ABID QURESHI, ESQ. One Bryant Park New Y

Arent Fox LLP Beth M. Brownstein

1301 Avenue of

the Americas 42nd Fl New Y

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP Frank M. Pitre

San Francisco

Airport Office

Center

840 Malcom Rd.,

#200 Burlin

Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP Kevin J. Orsini 825 Eighth Avenue New Y

Jones Day BRUCE BENNETT, ESQ.

555 South Flower

Street Fiftieth Floor Los An

Kaupp & Feinberg, LLP

WILLIAM GORDON

KAUPP, ESQ.

One Sansome

Street Floor 35 San Fr

Keller & Benvenutti, LLP

PETER J. BENVENUTTI,

ESQ.

650 CaliforniaStreet 19th Floor San Fr

Kenneth Roye 142 West 2nd St. Suite B Chico 

Mary Alexander & Associates, P.C. Mary E. Alexander

44 Montgomery

St., #1303 San Fr

Stone & Associates, A ProfessionalCorporation

Attn: RONALD F.

BERESTKA, JR., ESQ.

2125 YgnacioValley Road Suite 101 Walnu

United States Department of Justice

Office of the U.S.

Trustee

GREG M. ZIPES,

ESQ.

450 Golden GateAvenue Suite 05‐0153 San Fr

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP Stephen Karotkin 767 Fifth Avenue New Y

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP Theodore Tsekerides 767 Fifth Avenue New Y

In re: PG&E Corporation, et al.Case No. 19‐30088 (DM) Page 1 of 1

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5210 Filed: 12/27/19 Entered: 12/27/19 08:57:30 Page 

5
Exhibit B 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5210 Filed: 12/27/19 Entered: 12/27/19 08:57:30 Page 4 of

5
Form TRANSC

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

California Northern Bankruptcy Court

In re Debtor(s):

PG&E Corporation

Case No.: 19−30088 DM 11

Chapter: 11

NOTICE OF FILING OF TRANSCRIPT

AND DEADLINES RELATED TO RESTRICTION AND REDACTION

A transcript of the proceeding held on December 17, 2019 was filed on December 19, 2019. The following deadlines

apply:

The parties have until Thursday, December 26, 2019 to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of

this transcript. The deadline for filing a request for redaction is Thursday, January 9, 2020.

If a request for redaction is filed, the redacted transcript is due Tuesday, January 21, 2020.

If no such notice is filed, the transcript may be made available for remote electronic access upon expiration of the

restriction period, which is Wednesday, March 18, 2020, unless extended by court order.

To review the transcript for redaction purposes, you may purchase a copy from the transcriber,

Jason Gottlieb

Attn: Jason Gottlieb, Dir. of Tran. Ops.

7227 N 16th St. #207

Phoenix, AZ 85020

or you may view the document at the clerk's office public terminal.

Dated: 12/23/19 For the Court:

Edward J. Emmons

Clerk of Court

United States Bankruptcy Court

SRF 38513

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5210 Filed: 12/27/19 Entered: 12/27/19 08:57:30 Page 5 of

5
1 The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 04-1542

___________ United States of America, * Plaintiff-Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States V. * District Court for the Southern * District of Iowa. Santiago Gomez, * also known as Santiago, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Defendant-Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: October 19, 2004 Filed: November 1, 2004

___________ Before MURPHY, HEANEY, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Santiago Gomez was convicted by a jury of conspiracy to distribute cocaine. The district court 1 found him responsible for 58.54 kilograms of cocaine with a base offense level of 36, applied a three level enhancement for his role as a manager or supervisor, and sentenced him to serve 300 months. Gomez appeals, arguing that the2 Counsel for Gomez has requested leave to file a supplemental brief on the applicability of Blakely v. Washington , 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), but we have decided not to receive such briefs until after the Supreme Court releases its opinions in United States v. Booker and United States v. Fanfan . See Administrative Order Regarding Blakely Cases, issued on September 27, 2004. -2- district court's findings of drug quantity and role in the offense were not supported by the evidence. 2 We affirm. Gomez argues that 40 kilograms of cocaine were improperly attributed to him. He contends the evidence did not show that he was involved in the 40 kilogram transaction and that there had been at most preliminary discussions. He also argues that the transaction was not within the scope of the conspiracy and that the conspiracy was not capable of delivering that amount. The government points to evidence that Gomez was part of the same drug network as those who planned this transaction, that there was an agreement to do the deal, that this transaction was a reasonably foreseeable activity of the conspiracy in which Gomez had an integral role, and that the conspiracy was capable of supplying thousands of kilograms of cocaine. We conclude that the district court did not clearly err in its finding of drug quantity. Gomez also argues there was no proof he had a managerial or supervisory role in the conspiracy. There was evidence, however, that Gomez supervised and managed Darryl Wilson and that he directed cocaine delivery times and locations. We conclude that the district court did not clearly err in its finding of Gomez's role in the offense. After our de novo review of the district court's application of the sentencing guidelines to the facts, see United States v. Guy , 340 F.3d 655, 658 (8 thCir. 2003), we conclude that there is no basis for reversal. The judgment of the district court is therefore affirmed.

______________________________
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5667 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5667

      To exempt small mortgage originators from certain licensing 
 requirements and debt-to-income requirements for qualified mortgages.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 18, 2014

 Mr. Williams introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To exempt small mortgage originators from certain licensing 
 requirements and debt-to-income requirements for qualified mortgages.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Seller Finance Regulation Reduction 
Act''.

SEC. 2. EXEMPTIONS FOR SELLER FINANCERS.

    (a) Loan Originator License or Registration Requirements.--Section 
1504 of the S.A.F.E. Mortgage Licensing Act of 2008 (12 U.S.C. 5103) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) Exception for Seller Financers.--The requirements of this 
title shall not apply to any person (other than a depository 
institution) who--
            ``(1) has less than $25,000,000 in assets; and
            ``(2) only originates residential mortgage loans that--
                    ``(A) are with respect to property that is owned by 
                such person; and
                    ``(B) are in an amount of $150,000 or less.''.
    (b) Debt-to-Income Ratios Under Qualified Mortgages.--Section 
129C(b)(2)(A) of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1639c(b)(2)(A)) is 
amended by inserting at the end the following flush-left text:
                ``In determining whether a residential mortgage loan is 
                a qualified mortgage, guidelines and regulations issued 
                pursuant to clause (vi) shall not apply to a loan 
                originated by a person (other than a depository 
                institution (as defined under section 3 of the Federal 
                Deposit Insurance Act) or a credit union) who has less 
                than $25,000,000 in assets and where such loan is with 
                respect to property that is owned by such person and 
                such loan is in an amount of $150,000 or less.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), the undersigned
sole director of S Wind-up Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter year ended March 31, 2005, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the Periodic Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Periodic
Report and results of operations for the Company for periods covered by the Periodic Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ IRV LICHTENWALDName:

Irv LichtenwaldTitle:

DirectorDated: May 6, 2005




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to S Wind-up Corporation (the Company) and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or its staff upon request. This
certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
FIL ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTHCI RCUI T MARCH 20, 2012 J OHN L EY CL ERK [DO N OT PUBLISH]
IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 1- 10 77 4
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNo. 5 :1 0- cv -0 26 98 -CLS JEROM E SIROTE, Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll an t, ve rs us BBVA COM PASS BANK, etal., Defen da nt s- App el le es .

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt forth e North ernDis tri ctof Al ab am a
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ (Ma rch 20 , 20 12 ) Befo re BARKETT an d HULL, Cir cu itJu dg es , andHUNT, Dis tri ctJu dg e. * PER CURI AM: Honora ble Will is B. Hunt, Jr., United States District J udg e for the Northe rn District of * Georg ia, sitting by

designation.Afte r rev ie w of t he reco rdan d wi th th e b en efi t o f or al arg um en t, we d is cern

no rev ers ib le erro r in th e d is tri ctco urt’s Dece m be r 30 , 20 10 ord er d is m is si ng th e pl ai nt iff’s fed eral cla im s wi th pre jud ic e an d d is m is si ng th e p la in ti ff’s s tate law cl ai m s wi th ou t p reju di ce. See 28 U.S.C. § 1 36 7( c). W e li ke wis e d is cern no rev ers ib le erro r in th e d is tri ctco urt’s Fe brua ry 1, 2 01 1 o rd er d en y in g t he pl ai nt iff’s m ot io n t o a lt er o r am en d the Decem be r 30 , 20 10 di sm is sa l o rd er. Acco rd in gl y , we affi rm

th e d is tri ctco urt’s o rd ers da te d Dec em be r 30 , 20 10 , and Feb ru ary 1, 2 01 1. AFFIRMED.

2
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NED/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ZIAD A. HUSEIN,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 06-72577

Agency No. A079-606-807

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 11, 2010** 

Before: BEEZER, TROTT, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Ziad A. Husein, a native of Palestine and citizen of Jordan, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum,

FILED

JAN 20 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
NED/Research 2 06-72577

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture

(“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial

evidence, INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 n. 1 (1992), and we deny the

petition for review.

Even if Husein’s asylum application was timely, substantial evidence

supports the IJ’s finding that the threats Husein received from Muslim

fundamentalists did not establish past persecution or a well-founded fear of future

persecution on account of a protected ground. See Sangha v. INS, 103 F.3d 1482,

1486 (9th Cir. 1997) (persecutors’ actions must be motivated by imputed political

opinion). Accordingly, his asylum claim fails.

Because Husein failed to demonstrate eligibility for asylum, it follows that

he did not satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. See

Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156-57 (9th Cir. 2003).

Substantial evidence also supports the IJ’s denial of CAT relief because

Husein failed to establish it was more likely than not he would be tortured if he

returned to Jordan. See Singh v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 1100, 1113 (9th Cir. 2006). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
exv10w1






Exhibit 10.1




Amendment to Employment Agreement



This Amendment to Employment Agreement, effective as of August 6, 2009 by and between Sapient
Corporation (“Sapient”) and Alan J. Herrick (“Herrick”) (the “Amendment”) amends the letter
agreement dated July 18, 2007 by and between Sapient and Herrick (the “Employment Agreement”).
Terms not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings set forth in the Employment
Agreement.



Each of Sapient and Herrick hereby agrees to amend the Employment Agreement as follows:





	1.	 	Section 4(b) is revised and replaced in its entirety as follows:






By the Company Other than for Cause. The Company also may terminate your
employment at any time other than for Cause upon notice to you. The Company’s
notice of non-renewal at the end of the initial term or any renewal term of
this Agreement shall constitute a termination by the Company other than for
Cause.




	2.	 	The following sentence is added to the end of Section 5(e):






Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, any
payment or benefit under this Agreement to which Section 409A applies as a
result of final Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-1(b)(9)(v)(A) or (C) shall
be paid or provided to you only if (i) the expenses are not incurred, or the
benefits are not provided, beyond the last day of the second taxable year
following the taxable year in which your employment terminates pursuant to
Section 4; (ii) such expenses are reimbursed no later than the last day of the
third taxable year following the taxable year in which your employment
terminates pursuant to Section 4; and (iii) the right to payment or
reimbursement or in kind benefits may not be liquidated or exchanged for any
other benefit.


Except to the extent specifically amended hereby, the Employment Agreement shall remain unmodified
and is hereby confirmed as being in full force and effect. In the event of a conflict between the
terms of this Amendment and the terms of the Employment Agreement, the terms of this Amendment
shall control.



This Amendment is hereby executed and effective as of the date first above written.


Agreed:




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Sapient Corporation
	 	 	 	Alan J. Herrick	 	 





 









 








	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Darius

	 	 

W. Gaskins, Jr.
	 	 	 	 

Alan J. Herrick
	 	  
	Chairman, Board of Directors	 	 	 	President & Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 107 (Friday, June 4, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 31820]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13553]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, June 9, 2010 at 11:30 a.m.

PLACE: Commission's main conference room, 901 New York Avenue, NW., 
Suite 200, Washington, DC 20268-0001.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.


 MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

    1. Personnel: consideration of candidates for one or more officer-
level positions (closed).
    2. Personnel: discussion of staff-level vacancies (closed).
    3. Contracts: discussion of confidential commercial information 
relative to Commission contracts (closed).

CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Brian Corcoran, Postal 
Regulatory Commission, at 202-789-6828 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2446564d454a0a474b56474b56454a645456470a434b52"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="93f1e1faf2fdbdf0fce1f0fce1f2fdd3e3e1f0bdf4fce5">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: June 2, 2010.
Shoshana M. Grove,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-13553 Filed 6-2-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-S


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EXHIBIT C

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4255-3 Filed: 10/17/19 Entered: 10/17/19 15:02:41 Page 1

of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EXHIBIT C

EXPENSE SUMMARY

FOR THE PERIOD AUGUST 18, 2019 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 17, 2019

EXPENSES AMOUNTS

Conference Calls (incurred on 8/12/2019) $508.56

Court Costs $85.00

Airfare/ Train Fare $7,478.08

Lodging $1,716.00

Ground Transportation $1,703.75

Business Meals $308.12

Total Expenses Requested: $11,799.51

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4255-3 Filed: 10/17/19 Entered: 10/17/19 15:02:41 Page 2

of 2