alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 105 (Wednesday, June 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 30867]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13166]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

[OMB Control No. 3206-0142; Standard Form 2808]


Proposed Collection; Comment Request for Review of a Revised 
Information Collection

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. 
L. 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of 
Personnel Management (OPM) intends to submit to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) a request for review of a revised 
information collection. This information collection, ``Designation of 
Beneficiary: Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS)'' (OMB Control No. 
3206-0142; Standard Form 2808), is used by persons covered by CSRS to 
designate a beneficiary to receive the lump sum payment due from the 
Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund in the event of their 
death.
    Comments are particularly invited on: Whether this information is 
necessary for the proper performance of functions of the Office of 
Personnel Management, and whether it will have practical utility; 
whether our estimate of the public burden of this collection of 
information is accurate, and based on valid assumptions and 
methodology; and ways in which we can minimize the burden of the 
collection of information on those who are to respond, through the use 
of appropriate technological collection techniques or other forms of 
information technology.
    Approximately 2,000 forms will be completed annually. The form 
takes approximately 15 minutes to complete. The annual burden is 
estimated at 500 hours.
    For copies of this proposal, contact Cyrus S. Benson on (202) 606-
4808, FAX (202) 606-0910 or via e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7033090205035e32151e031f1e301f001d5e171f06"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f0b389828583deb2959e839f9eb09f809dde979f86">[email protected]</span></a>. Please 
include a mailing address with your request.

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received within 60 calendar 
days from the date of this publication.

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to James K. Freiert (Acting), 
Deputy Associate Director, Retirement Operations, Retirement and 
Benefits, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW., Room 
3305, Washington, DC 20415-3500.
    For information regarding administrative coordination contact:
    Cyrus S. Benson, Team Leader, Publications Team, RB/RM/
Administrative Services, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E 
Street, NW., Room 4H28, Washington, DC 20415, (202) 606-4808.

U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
John Berry,
Director.
[FR Doc. 2010-13166 Filed 6-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-38-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**STATEMENTOF THE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Sehat Sutardja Ph.D, the chief executive officer of MarvellTechnology Group Ltd. (the “Company”), certify for the purposes of 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,

 

(i)             the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Qfor the fiscal quarter ended August 2, 2008 (the “Report”), fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, and

 

(ii)          the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.

 
|   | /s/ SEHAT  SUTARDJA PH.D.              |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Sehat Sutardja  Ph.D.                  |
|   | President and  Chief Executive Officer |
|   | Date:  September 10, 2008         |

 

----
#### DELL GLOVER v. CARL GLOVER.

(Filed 22 March, 1944.)

Estates § 5: Deeds § 13b—

A conveyance to one for “his lifetime, and at his death to his heirs, if any, his heirs,” invokes the application of the rule in *Shelley’s ease*and vests a fee in the first taker. The use of the phrase “if any” does not prevent the application of the rule, since there is no limitation over.

Appeal by defendant from *Dixon, Special Judge,*at November Term, 1943, of JohNstoN.

Affirmed.

This was a controversy without action, submitted on an agreed statement of facts, to determine tbe title to land, tbe subject of a contract to convey. From judgment that plaintiff’s deed would convey a good title, defendant appealed.

*Wellons, Martin & Wellons for plaintiff.*

*Parker ■& Lee for defendant.*

DeviN, J.

Plaintiff derived bis title to tbe described land under a deed conveying tbe land “to him bis lifetime, and at bis death to bis heirs, if any, bis heirs and assigns.” Tbe word “assigns” was stricken through with a pen. Apparently tbe repetition of tbe word heirs and tbe crossing out of tbe word assigns was occasioned by tbe use of a printed form in drawing tbe deed.

We think tbe word heirs used in tbe premises and *habendum*of plaintiff’s deed must be construed in its technical sense as indicating those who are to take in inheritable succession, rather than as meaning children or issue. Tbe intention of tbe grantor is to be ascertained from tbe language used in tbe deed, interpreted in accord with tbe well established rules of law' applicable thereto. *Williamson v. Cox,*218 N. C., 177, 10 S. E. (2d), 662. Tbe conveyance is to tbe plaintiff for “bis lifetime,” •and in tbe same conveyance tbe remainder is to bis heirs general. This invoked tbe application of tbe rule in *Shelley’s case,*and vested tbe fee in tbe first taker. *Martin v. Knowles,*195 N. C., 427, 142 S. E., 313; *Benton v. Baucom,*192 N. C., 630, 135 S. E., 629. Tbe use of tbe phrase “if any,” following tbe word heirs may not be held to prevent tbe application of tbe rule, since there is no limitation over. This distinguishes this case from *Puckett v. Morgan,*158 N. C., 344, 74 S. E., 15, and *Jones v. Whichard,*163 N. C., 241, 79 S. E., 503, relied on by defendant.

We think tbe court below has ruled correctly, and tbe judgment on tbe facts agreed is

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350   In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-Q of Mod Hospitality, Inc. f/k/a PSPP Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ending September 30, 2009, I, Frederic S. Richardson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:  1.    Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Dated:  November 13, 2009By:/s/ FREDERIC S. RICHARDSONFrederic S. RichardsonChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
#### MRS. J. C. HUBBEL v. TALBOT FURNITURE COMPANY.

(Filed 1 May, 1940.)

Negligence § 3—

Allegations and evidence to the effect that defendant’s salesman, in demonstrating a washing machine, started it working without warning while plaintiff’s hand was known by him to be in close proximity to the machine, and that plaintiff’s hand was caught therein, resulting in injury, *held*sufficient to overrule defendant’s *motion to*nonsuit.

Appeal by defendant from *Johnston, Special Judge,*at October Term, 1939, of MECKLENBURG-.

*Carswell & Ervin for plaintiff, appellee.*

*J. Louis Carter for defendant, appellant.*

Per Curiam.

This is an action by the plaintiff to recover damages for personal injury alleged to have been negligently inflicted by the defendant.

The allegations of the complaint are to the effect that the defendant left a washing machine at the home of the plaintiff for the purpose of making a sale thereof, and that while the salesman of the defendant was demonstrating said machine in an endeavor to correct some difficulty which the plaintiff had had in the operation thereof, he turned the electric current on the machine while plaintiff’s hand was known to be in close proximity thereto, without giving her any warning, thereby causing the machinery to be put in motion and to catch the hand of the plaintiff therein, to her injury.

When the plaintiff had introduced her evidence and rested her case the defendant moved for judgment as in case of nonsuit, C. S., 567, which motion was denied, and defendant reserved exception.

The jury answered the issues of negligence, contributory negligence and damage in favor of the plaintiff, and from judgment predicated upon the verdict the defendant appealed, assigning error.

The only assignment of error set out in the appellant’s brief is to the denial of the defendant’s motion for judgment as in case of nonsuit. *519Since tbe evidence, wben taken in tbe light most favorable to tbe plaintiff, supports tbe allegations of tbe complaint, tbis exception cannot be sustained, and tbe judgment of tbe Superior Court must be affirmed.

No error.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-8084

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

DARIUS JAVON JONES, a/k/a Nudie, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District 

Judge. (2:02-cr-00225-JBF-7) 

Submitted: December 16, 2008 Decided: December 29, 2008 

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Darius Javon Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Darryl James Mitchell, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 Darius Javon Jones appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. United States v. Jones, No. 2:02-cr00225-JBF-7 (E.D. Va. Aug. 28, 2008). Jones’ Motion to Request 

Copies of Record and Transcript is denied. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AT JANUARY 31, 2000 AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 31, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                          75,125
<SECURITIES>                                     6,862
<RECEIVABLES>                                   63,081
<ALLOWANCES>                                       874
<INVENTORY>                                     96,105
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               246,953
<PP&E>                                         419,819
<DEPRECIATION>                                 169,540
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 553,348
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          104,972
<BONDS>                                        421,039
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (129,023)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   553,348
<SALES>                                        141,212
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               141,212
<CGS>                                          119,108
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  119,108
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,108
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (15)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,409
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,794
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,794
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,794
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5605 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5605

  To disapprove an amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines relating to 
 sentences for drug offenses which was transmitted to Congress by the 
 United States Sentencing Commission on April 30, 2014, including any 
                 retroactive effect for that amendment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 18, 2014

 Mr. Holding introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To disapprove an amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines relating to 
 sentences for drug offenses which was transmitted to Congress by the 
 United States Sentencing Commission on April 30, 2014, including any 
                 retroactive effect for that amendment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Public Safety and Federal 
Resources Act''.

SEC. 2. DISAPPROVAL OF UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION AMENDMENT 
              RELATING TO SENTENCES FOR DRUG OFFENSES.

    In accordance with section 994(p) of title 28, United States Code, 
the amendment numbered 3 of the Amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines 
submitted by the United States Sentencing Commission to Congress on 
April 30, 2014, is hereby disapproved and shall not take effect.
                                 <all>
```
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 5078    Filed: 12/11/19    Entered: 12/11/19 17:56:54    Page 1 of3

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 5078    Filed: 12/11/19    Entered: 12/11/19 17:56:54    Page 2 of3

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 5078    Filed: 12/11/19    Entered: 12/11/19 17:56:54    Page 3 of3
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5310 

To amend the S.A.F.E. Mortgage Licensing Act of 2008 to specify that 

courses offered by lenders for their own employees may not satisfy 

the pre-licensing education or continuing education requirement. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 31, 2014 

Mr. GARY G. MILLER of California (for himself and Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the S.A.F.E. Mortgage Licensing Act of 2008 

to specify that courses offered by lenders for their own 

employees may not satisfy the pre-licensing education 

or continuing education requirement. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Independ5 ence in the Education of Loan Originators Act of 2014’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON EDUCATIONAL COURSES. 

7 (a) PRE-LICENSING COURSES.—Section 

8 1505(c)(3)(A) of the S.A.F.E. Mortgage Licensing Act of 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5310 IH

1 2008 (12 U.S.C. 5104(c)(3)(A)) is amended to read as 

2 follows: 

3 ‘‘(A) LIMITATION.—To maintain the inde4 pendence of the approval process— 

5 ‘‘(i) the Nationwide Mortgage Licens6 ing System and Registry shall not directly 

7 or indirectly offer pre-licensure educational 

8 courses for loan originators; and 

9 ‘‘(ii) no course offered directly or indi10 rectly by a lender for the lender’s own em11 ployees shall qualify for purposes of para12 graph (1).’’. 

13 (b) CONTINUING EDUCATION COURSES.—Section 

14 1506(b)(5)(A) of the S.A.F.E. Mortgage Licensing Act of 

15 2008 (12 U.S.C. 5105(b)(5)(A)) is amended to read as 

16 follows: 

17 ‘‘(A) LIMITATION.—To maintain the inde18 pendence of the approval process— 

19 ‘‘(i) the Nationwide Mortgage Licens20 ing System and Registry shall not directly 

21 or indirectly offer continuing education 

22 courses for loan originators; and 

23 ‘‘(ii) no course offered directly or indi24 rectly by a lender for the lender’s own emVerDate Mar 15 2010 04:11 Aug 09, 2014 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5310.IH H5310

smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5310 IH

1 ployees shall qualify for purposes of para2 graph (1).’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Unassociated Document


    EXHIBIT
4.4

     

    
      PROMISSORY
NOTE

      Roger
Ralston


       

      
        	Boca Raton,
      Florida	      
                $5,000.00 

              


      

      May 6,
2009

      


      For value received, the undersigned
DirectView Holdings, Inc.(“Borrower”) with office Located at 7700 W Camino Real,
Suite 403, Boca Raton, FL  33433, promises to pay to in lawful money
of the United States of America or security equivalent to the order
of  Roger Ralston, (“Lender”) located at  19576 Saturnia Lakes Dr.,
Boca Raton, FL 33433 or such other place as the Lender may designate in
writing, the principle sum of FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($5,000.00), together with
interest thereon at the rate of 12.0% per annum.  Principal and
related interest shall be payable on November 2, 2009

      


      This Promissory note may be pre-paid in
whole or in part at any time prior to the maturity without premium or penalty of
any kind.  Borrower may prepay this Note in cash or other equivalent
securities at any time without penalty.  If paid in stock it will be
paid at par value per share.

      


      The
Borrower and any endorsers of this note hereby agree to waive demand, notice of
non-payment and protest, and in case suit shall be brought for the collection
hereof or the note has to be collected upon demand of any attorney, to pay
reasonable attorney’s fees for making such collection, and/or attorney’s fees
and costs incurred by Lender, or holders hereof in prosecuting or defending
litigation to effect collection, including costs and attorney’s fees in
appellate courts.

      


      During
the period of any default under the terms of this Note, and from and after
maturity, the interest rate on the entire indebtedness then outstanding shall be
at the rate of twenty one percent (21%) per annum.  Notwithstanding
any provision of the Note to the contrary, it is expressly agreed that the
amounts payable under this Note in the nature of or which would be considered as
interest or other charge for the use or loan of money shall not exceed the
highest rate allowed by the laws of the State of Florida.

      


      This
Promissory Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws
of the State of Florida.


       

    

    
      


      DirectView Holdings, Inc.

       

      By:

      


      Name: Roger
Ralston

      


      Title:  CEO
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Stakool, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the three month period ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kyle Gotshalk, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and   (2)The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: March 30, 2010By: /s/ Kyle GotshalkKyle GotshalkPrincipal Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)




In connection with the Annual Report of UTEC, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Howard Bouch, CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Howard BouchHoward Bouch CFODated: September 19 , 2011
**Exhibit 35.2**

 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE TRUST 2007-A**

 

Capital One Auto Finance Trust 2007-A

Capital One Auto Finance, Inc.

c/o 1680 Capital One Drive

McLean, Virginia 22102

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Capital OneAuto Finance Trust 2007-A for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007(the “Report”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Capital One,National Association (the “Servicer”), does hereby certify and represent that:

 

1.   A review of the activitiesand performance of the Servicer under the Services Agreement dated as of February 17,2006, by and between Capital One Auto Finance, Inc. and the Servicer (the “Agreement”)during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under mysupervision.

 

2.   To the best of my knowledge,based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations underthe Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is thesubject of the Report.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this ServicerCompliance Statement this 25th day of March 2008.

 

**CAPITAL ONE, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION**

 
| By:    | /s/ Steven Theobald     |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
| Name:  | Steven Theobald         |
| Title: | Chief Financial Officer |
|        |                         |        |  |

 

----
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4335    Filed: 10/21/19    Entered: 10/21/19 12:05:14    Page 1 of5

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4335    Filed: 10/21/19    Entered: 10/21/19 12:05:14    Page 2 of5

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4335    Filed: 10/21/19    Entered: 10/21/19 12:05:14    Page 3 of5

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4335    Filed: 10/21/19    Entered: 10/21/19 12:05:14    Page 4 of5

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4335    Filed: 10/21/19    Entered: 10/21/19 12:05:14    Page 5 of5