alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT B 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5090-2 Filed: 12/12/19 Entered: 12/12/19 15:15:22 Page 1

of 11
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5090-2 Filed: 12/12/19 Entered: 12/12/19 15:15:22 Page 2

of 11
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5090-2 Filed: 12/12/19 Entered: 12/12/19 15:15:22 Page 3

of 11
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5090-2 Filed: 12/12/19 Entered: 12/12/19 15:15:22 Page 4

of 11
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5090-2 Filed: 12/12/19 Entered: 12/12/19 15:15:22 Page 5

of 11
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5090-2 Filed: 12/12/19 Entered: 12/12/19 15:15:22 Page 6

of 11
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5090-2 Filed: 12/12/19 Entered: 12/12/19 15:15:22 Page 7

of 11
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5090-2 Filed: 12/12/19 Entered: 12/12/19 15:15:22 Page 8

of 11
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5090-2 Filed: 12/12/19 Entered: 12/12/19 15:15:22 Page 9

of 11
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5090-2 Filed: 12/12/19 Entered: 12/12/19 15:15:22 Page 10

of 11
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5090-2 Filed: 12/12/19 Entered: 12/12/19 15:15:22 Page 11

of 11
#### SCOTT DRUG COMPANY v. MRS. N. A. PATTERSON.

(Filed 2 April, 1930.)

Venue C a — Removal of receivership action from county of defendant’s residence for creditoi*s’ convenience is erroneous.

Where an action in the nature of a creditors’ bill and for the appointment of a receiver is brought in the county wherein the defendant resides, and a temporary receiver is therein appointed, upon the hearing at *549chambers in another county wherein the temporary receivership is made permanent, an order removing the cause to the county of the hearing for the convenience of a large number of creditors is improvidently made, and that part of the judgment will be stricken out on appeal.

Appeal by defendant from *Hams, J.,*at January Term, 1930, of ORANGE. ‘f

Civil action in the nature of a creditors’ bill and for the appointment of a receiver.

The action was instituted in the Superior Court of Orange County 7 January, 1930, and on the following day a temporary receiver was appointed and the defendant required to appear in Durham, before Hon. *~W.*C. Harris, at Chambers, on 17 January, 1930, and show cause why the temporary receivership should not be continued.

Thereafter, at the hearing in Durham, the receivership was made permanent, and the cause ordered removed from Orange County to Durham County “for the convenience of a large number of the creditors and attorneys for creditors,” and to he consolidated with another cause pending in the Superior Court of the latter county. The plaintiff is a corporation with its principal place of business in Mecklenburg County, while the defendant is a resident of Orange County.

The defendant appeals from the order of removal, assigning same as error.

*No counsel appearing for plaintiff.*

*H. A. Whitfield and Gattis & Gattis for defendant.*

Stacy, C. J.

The order of removal was improvidently entered. This part of the judgment will be stricken out. *Turnage v. Dunn,*196 N. C., 105, 144 S. E., 521; *Bisanar v. Suttlemyre,*193 N. C., 711, 138 S. E., 1.

Error.
SUBSIDIARIES OF CMP SUSQUEHANNA RADIO HOLDINGS CORP.
 Exact Name of Registrant as
    
    State of IncorporationSpecified in its Charter
    
    or OrganizationCMP Susquehanna Corp.
    
    DelawareCMP KC Corp.
    
    DelawareCMP Houston-KC, LLC
    
    DelawareSusquehanna Pfaltzgraff Co.
    
    DelawareSusquehanna Media Co.
    
    DelawareSusquehanna Radio Corp.
    
    PennsylvaniaRadio Metroplex, Inc.
    
    NevadaKLIF Broadcasting, Inc.
    
    NevadaKPLX Lico, Inc.
    
    NevadaKLIF Lico, Inc.
    
    Nevada
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lionbridge Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Rory J. Cowan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Donald M. Muir, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 8, 2010



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ RORY J. COWAN      
|Rory J. Cowan          
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|/s/ DONALD M. MUIR     
|Donald M. Muir         
|Chief Financial Officer
#### BESSIE B. KELLY v. J. P. KELLY.

(Filed 29 November, 1950.)

Appeal and Error § 38—

Where the Supreme Court is evenly divided in opinion, one Justice not sitting, the judgment of the lower court will be affirmed without becoming a precedent.

Joiinsou, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Phillips, Resident Judge*of the 13th Judicial District, at Chambers, 30 September, 1950.

Civil action for alimony without divorce under statute codified as G.S. 50-16.

*Carroll & Sleele for plaintiff, appellant.*

*Boggan, Page, Lee & Page for defendant, appellee.*

Per Curiam.

The appeal is from an order denying the application of the *feme*plaintiff for an allowance out of the estate or earnings of her husband, the defendant, for subsistence and counsel fees pending the trial of the issues involved in the action. Since *Justice Johnson*does not sit in this cause and the remainder of the Court are evenly divided in opinion, the order of the Superior Court is affirmed without becoming a precedent. *Hinson v. Comrs. of Yadkin,*216 N.C. 806, 6 S.E. 2d 504.

Affirmed.

JOHNSON, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of MEMSIC, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Dr. Yang Zhao, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 14, 2008



/S/ YANG
ZHAOYang ZhaoPresident and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 235 (Thursday, December 7, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 62873]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-29764]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Public Health Service


National Institutes of Health; Statement of Organization, 
Functions, and Delegations of Authority

    Part H, Chapter HN (National Institutes of Health) of the Statement 
of Organization, Functions, and Delegations of Authority for the 
Department of Health and Human Services (40 FR 22859, May 27, 1975, as 
amended most recently at 60 FR 48518, September 19, 1995) is amended to 
reflect the reorganization of the Office of the Director, National 
Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (OD/NIAID) (HNM). The 
reorganization consists of the following: (1) Establish the Office of 
Clinical Research (HNM1B) in the Office of the Director. This 
reorganization will enable the NIAID to better fulfill its mission by 
restructuring the OD/NIAID to better integrate related program areas 
and streamline operations.
    Section HN-B, Organization and Functions is amended as follows: (1) 
Under the heading Office of the Director (HNM1), insert the following:
    Office of Clinical Research (HNM1B). (1) Is responsible for 
developing, implementing, and evaluating policies and practices related 
to the conduct of human subjects research within NIAID, (2) advises the 
Director, NIAID, on the portfolio of clinical research conducted and 
sponsored by NIAID and reviews research protocols for relevance to the 
mission of the Institute, priority to meet the needs of the public 
health of the nation, ethics in human use, and appropriateness of 
scientific design, (3) manages NIAID's clinical research program 
carried out in the Clinical Center, NIH, (4) oversees the activities of 
the NIAID Institutional Review Board, (5) corresponds with other 
government agencies, organizations, and the public to provide timely 
and relevant information on the clinical research programs of NIAID, 
and (6) promotes interaction between intramural and extramural 
investigators, particularly with regard to collaboration on clinical 
research conducted at the Clinical Center, NIH.

    Dated: November 19, 1995.
Harold Varmus,
Director, NIH.
[FR Doc. 95-29764 Filed 12-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 236 (Friday, December 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63025-63026]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-29958]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED

Procurement List; Proposed Additions

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.


[[Page 63026]]

ACTION: Proposed additions to Procurement List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee has received proposals to add to the Procurement 
List services to be furnished by nonprofit agencies employing persons 
who are blind or have other severe disabilities.

COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED ON OR BEFORE: January 8, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, Crystal Square 3, Suite 403, 1735 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Arlington, Virginia 22202-3461.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Milkman (703) 603-7740.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is published pursuant to 41 
U.S.C. 47(a) (2) and 41 CFR 51-2.3. Its purpose is to provide 
interested persons an opportunity to submit comments on the possible 
impact of the proposed actions.
    If the Committee approves the proposed additions, all entities of 
the Federal Government (except as otherwise indicated) will be required 
to procure the services listed below from nonprofit agencies employing 
persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities.
    I certify that the following action will not have a significant 
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The major factors 
considered for this certification were:
    1. The action will not result in any additional reporting, 
recordkeeping or other compliance requirements for small entities other 
than the small organizations that will furnish the services to the 
Government.
    2. The action does not appear to have a severe economic impact on 
current contractors for the services.
    3. The action will result in authorizing small entities to furnish 
the services to the Government.
    4. There are no known regulatory alternatives which would 
accomplish the objectives of the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46-
48c) in connection with the services proposed for addition to the 
Procurement List.
    Comments on this certification are invited. Commenters should 
identify the statement(s) underlying the certification on which they 
are providing additional information.
    The following services have been proposed for addition to 
Procurement List for production by the nonprofit agencies listed:

Administrative Services, Social Security Administration, Great Lakes 
Program Service Center, Chicago, Illinois, NPA: Lester & Rosalie 
ANIXTER CENTER, Chicago, Illinois
Grounds Maintenance, Base Command, Building 2750, Burger King, Building 
6006, Edwards Air Force Base, California, NPA: Desert Haven 
Enterprises, Inc., Lancaster, California.
Beverly L. Milkman,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 95-29958 Filed 12-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-33-P
EXHIBIT 10.1


                                  AMENDMENT TO

                        SAVVIS COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
                             1999 STOCK OPTION PLAN

                  The SAVVIS Communications Corporation 1999 Stock Option Plan
(the "Plan") is hereby amended as set forth below, effective as of the date of
adoption (the "Adoption Date") of this amendment (the "Amendment") by the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of SAVVIS Communications
Corporation (the "Corporation"), subject to approval of this Amendment by the
stockholders of the Corporation, as provided below:

1.       The first sentence of Section 2(a) is hereby amended and restated in
         its entirety to read as follows:

         "SECTION 2. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SHARES.

                  (a) The maximum number of shares of Stock which may be issued
         pursuant to Options under the Plan, and the maximum number of shares
         for which ISOs may be granted under the Plan, shall be 24,000,000
         shares, subject to adjustment as provided in Section 8."

2.       The Plan shall be unchanged in all other respects.

3.       This Amendment is adopted subject to approval within one year of the
         Adoption Date by the stockholders of the Corporation. If the
         stockholders fail to approve this Amendment within one year of the
         Adoption Date, no awards may be granted under the Plan covering shares
         of stock in excess of the number permitted under the Plan as in effect
         before the Adoption Date.

                                      * * *

         The foregoing Amendment to the Plan was ratified and approved by the
Compensation Committee of Board of Directors of the Corporation on January 23,
2001, subject to approval of the Amendment by stockholders of the Corporation.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001058441
<NAME> RAINBOW RENTALS
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             757
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     29,997
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,608
<PP&E>                                           4,047
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,044
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,963
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,039
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,163
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    47,044
<SALES>                                            567
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,356
<CGS>                                            6,681
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,902
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   148
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 202
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,104
<INCOME-TAX>                                       874
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,230
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,230
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT B

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4633-2 Filed: 11/08/19 Entered: 11/08/19 17:04:46 Page 1

of 2
EXHIBIT B 

COMPENSATION BY PROFESSIONAL 

FOR THE PERIOD MARCH 1, 2019 THROUGH MAY 31, 2019 

 

Billing Total Total

Professional Position Rate Hours Fees

Brent Williams Managing Director 1,195 $ 601.1 718,254.75 $ 

Alex Stevenson Managing Director 1,195 212.6 254,057.00 

Brendan Murphy Managing Director 1,095 738.2 808,329.00 

Troy Peters General Counsel (In-House) 1,195 10.1 12,069.50 

Sherman Guillema Director 895 44.2 39,559.00 

Peter Gnatowski Vice President 795 398.1 316,489.50 

Carl Comstock Associate 695 242.1 168,259.50 

Matt Merkel Associate 695 590.1 410,084.75 

Naeem Muscatwalla Senior Analyst 495 236.4 117,018.00 

Riley Jacobs Analyst 395 433.3 171,153.50 

Alex Gebert Analyst 395 98.8 39,026.00 

Rikki Maynard Legal and Professional Support 250 38.3 9,575.00 

Jane Su Professional Support 250 14.6 3,650.00 

Jackie Hurley Professional Support 250 16.5 4,125.00 

Subtotal 3,071,650.50 3,674.3 $ 

Less: 50% Discount for Non-Working Travel Time (66,231.63) 

Grand Total $ 3,005,418.88

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4633-2 Filed: 11/08/19 Entered: 11/08/19 17:04:46 Page 2

of 2
#### Michael Bennett and another, Executors, Appellants, v. John M. Peck, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Dykman, J.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

YOLANDA DIANNE CERECERES,

Appellant, 

v.

FRANCISCO CERECERES,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-20-00092-CV

Appeal from the

383rd District Court 

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2018DCM0285)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether it should be 

dismissed for want of prosecution. Finding that Appellant, Yolanda Dianne Cereceres, has failed 

to pay the case filing fee, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

Appellant did not pay the case filing fee of $205.00 when she filed her notice of appeal, 

and there is nothing in the record before us to indicate Appellant is indigent. The Clerk of the Court 

sent Appellant two requests for payment of the case filing fee on March 30, 2020, and April 22, 

2020. Both letters notified Appellant that failure to pay the case filing fee within twenty days could 

result in dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution pursuant to TEX.R.APP.P. 42.3(b) and (c). 

Appellant has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to our notices. Pursuant to Rule 42.3(b) 

and (c), we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX.R.APP.P. 42.3(b), (c).
2

August 12, 2020

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, Diane Courtney, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of Luminent Mortgage Trust 2007-1 (the "Exchange Act periodic
    reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
    servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
    conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
    this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
    in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
    their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material
    respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. as Servicer and Washington Mutual Bank as Servicer.

    Dated:   March 26, 2008


    /s/ Diane Courtney
    Signature

    Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master
    servicer)