alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
License Agreement Amendment No. 8



 Exhibit 10.7 
 EXECUTION VERSION 
 LICENSE AGREEMENT 
 AMENDMENT No. 8 
 This License Agreement Amendment No. 8 (the “Amendment
No. 8”) executed and delivered as of April 27, 2009 amends the License Agreement dated September 20, 2005, as later amended (the “Agreement”) by and between Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC
(“S&P”) and Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (“CME”). 
 RECITALS 
 WHEREAS, S&P and CME are parties to the Agreement, and now mutually desire to amend certain terms of the same. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the covenants and conditions contained herein, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the
parties, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows. All capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment No. 8 shall have the meaning assigned to such terms in the Agreement. 
  

	1.	Appendix 1 shall be amended by adding the following language to the list of S&P Stock Indices: 

 S&P 500 Dividend Index 
  

	2.	Appendix 2 shall be amended by adding the following language at the end: 

 S&P 500 Dividend Index 
  

	3.	In the event of any conflict, ambiguity or inconsistency between the terms and conditions of this Amendment No. 8 and the terms and conditions of the Agreement, the terms and
conditions of this Amendment No. 8 shall govern and control. 

 Except as modified hereby, all of the terms and conditions of the
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment No. 8 to be executed as of the
date specified above. 
  

									
	STANDARD & POOR’S FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC.	 		 	CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE INC.
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Robert Shakotko
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Scot Warren

	Name:	 	Robert Shakotko	 		 	Name:	 	Scot Warren
	Title:	 	Managing Director, Index Services	 		 	Title:	 	Managing Director Equity Products

  

 2
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, Diane Courtney, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of Morgan Stanley Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-1XS (the "Exchange
    Act periodic reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
    servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
    conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
    this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
    in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
    their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material
    respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: GMAC
    Mortgage, LLC f/k/a GMAC Mortgage Corporation as Servicer, GreenPoint
    Mortgage Funding, Inc. as Servicer, and IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. as Servicer.

    Dated:   March 26, 2008


    /s/ Diane Courtney
    Signature

    Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master
    servicer)
#### The People ex rel. Thompson Kingsford v. The Board of Supervisors of Oswego county.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
#### Joseph E. Kula et al., Appellants, v State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, Respondent.

Submitted November 20,1996;

decided February 15, 1996

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order that affirmed so much of Supreme Court’s order as denied plaintiffs’ motion to amend their complaint and to add a party, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied, with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5705 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 10, 2014 

Received 

AN ACT 

To modify certain provisions relating to the Propane 

Education and Research Council. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5705 RDS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Propane Education 

3 and Research Enhancement Act of 2014’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE PROPANE EDU5 CATION AND RESEARCH COUNCIL. 

6 (a) FUNCTIONS OF PROPANE EDUCATION AND RE7 SEARCH COUNCIL.—Section 5(f) of the Propane Edu8 cation and Research Act of 1996 (15 U.S.C. 6404(f)) is 

9 amended in the first sentence by inserting ‘‘to train pro10 pane distributors and consumers in strategies to mitigate 

11 negative effects of future propane price spikes,’’ after ‘‘to 

12 enhance consumer and employee safety and training,’’. 

13 (b) MARKET SURVEY AND CONSUMER PROTECTION

14 PRICE ANALYSIS.—Section 9(a) of the Propane Education 

15 and Research Act of 1996 (15 U.S.C. 6408(a)) is amend16 ed in the first sentence by striking ‘‘only data provided 

17 by the Energy Information Administration’’ and inserting 

18 ‘‘the refiner price to end users of consumer grade propane, 

19 as published by the Energy Information Administration’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 9, 

2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### STATE v. WOODROW BENNETT.

(Filed 4 November, 1953.)

Appeal by the State from *Stevens, I.,*June Term, 1953, CeaveN.

Criminal prosecution under two warrants issued out of the County Recorder’s Court of Craven County. Defendant is charged in each warrant with a violation of the motor vehicle law. In the court below the two warrants were consolidated for trial. Thereupon, the court, upon motion of the defendant, quashed the warrants for that the Recorder’s Court of Craven County was without jurisdiction of the offenses therein charged. The State excepted and appealed.

*Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorney-General Moody for the State.*

*Charles L. Abernethy, Jr., for defendant, appellee.*

*550Barnhill, J.

This appeal presents tbe identical question decided by tbis Court in *S. v. Sloan, ante,*p. 547, tbis day filed. On authority of tbe opinion in that case, tbe judgment below is

Reversed.
#### STATE v. JOE BRISCOE.

(Filed 23 November, 1927.)

Intoxicating liquor — Spirituous liquor — Unlawful Possession — Evidence —Instructions.

Evidence in this case tended to show, and per *contra,*that defendant had in his possession three bottles of whiskey in his pocket, one hundred yards from his dwelling: *Sold,*under an indictment for unlawfully possessing intoxicating liquor, an instruction to convict if the jury found beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant had intoxicating liquor in his possession, outside of his dwelling, is *held,*correct, without the additional words “for an illegal purpose.”

Appeal by defendant from *Midyeite, J.,*and a jury at August Term, 1927, of Gates.

No error.

*Attorney-General Brum-mitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the Slate.*

*Bridger & Bley for defendant.*

ClakksoN, J.

J. D. Baines, deputy sheriff of Gates' County, testified in part: “The defendant bad three bottles of whiskey, one in his hand and two in his pockets. I know whiskey when I smell it.” The defendant at the time was about one hundred yards from his dwelling-house. Testimony to like effect was given by O. *W.*Hinton, also a deputy sheriff. Defendant testified that he had no whiskey, but what he had was vinegar. One of the counts in the bill of indictment was that defendant did unlawfully “possess intoxicating liquors.” For this he was convicted.

The defendant in his brief contends: “The court erred in charging as follows: Tt is unlawful for one to have intoxicating liquors in his possession outside of his dwelling-house in any quantity/ instead of charging as follows: 'It is unlawful for one to have intoxicating liquors in his possession outside of his dwelling-house in any quantity *for an illegal purpose.’ ”*

The charge as given is now well settled law in this jurisdiction. *S. v. Sigmon,*190 N. C., 684; *S. v. Pierce,*192 N. C., 766; *S. v. Hege, ante,*526.

The charge of the court below is full, fair, and accurate, and gave defendant every right that he was entitled to under the' law. ¥e can find

No error.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5479 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5479

To amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act to require public disclosure of 
 the method used to calculate consumer credit scores and inclusion of 
            debt settlement agreements in consumer reports.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 16, 2014

Mr. Bentivolio introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act to require public disclosure of 
 the method used to calculate consumer credit scores and inclusion of 
            debt settlement agreements in consumer reports.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PUBLIC DISCLOSURE OF METHOD USED TO CALCULATE CONSUMER 
              CREDIT SCORES.

    Section 609 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681g) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1)--
                    (A) by striking ``that--'' and all that follows 
                through ``if the consumer'' and inserting ``that, if 
                the consumer'';
                    (B) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``; and'' and 
                inserting a period; and
                    (C) by striking subparagraph (B); and
            (2) by amending subsection (f)(5) to read as follows:
            ``(5) Public disclosure of credit score methodology.--Any 
        person who develops a tool or system for deriving a credit 
        score shall make such tool or system available to the public, 
        including on such person's website.''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT FOR FURNISHERS OF INFORMATION TO REPORT DEBT 
              SETTLEMENT.

    Section 623(a) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681s-
1(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(10) Duty to provide notice of debt settlement.--A person 
        who furnishes information to a consumer reporting agency with 
        respect to a debt of a consumer shall, if the person enters 
        into a settlement agreement with the consumer with respect to 
        such debt, notify the consumer reporting agency of such 
        agreement within 30 days of such agreement.''.
                                 <all>
```
---

CONSENT OF MATTHEW P. REILLY

The undersigned hereby consents to: (i) the filing of the
written disclosure the technical report entitled Technical Report Update of Gas
Hills Uranium Project Freemont and Natrona Counties, Wyoming, USA dated March
22, 2013, in relation to (a) the Form 40-F Annual Report for the period ended
December 31, 2013, and any amendments thereto (the Form 40-F), of Energy Fuels
Inc. (the Company), filed with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission, (b) the Companys Annual Information Form for the period ended
December 31, 2013 (the AIF) and (c) the Management Information Circular of the
Company dated July 15, 2013, and the documents incorporated by reference therein
(the Circular); and (ii) the incorporation by reference of such disclosure
into (a) the Companys Form S-8 Registration Statement, being filed with the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission and any amendments thereto (the
S-8), and (b) the Companys Form F-10 Registration Statement, being filed with
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and any amendments thereto
(the F-10).

I also consent to: (i) the use of my name in the AIF, the
Circular, the F-10, and the Form 40-F; (ii) the incorporation by reference of
the Form 40-F and the AIF into the S-8; and (iii) the incorporation by reference
of the Form 40-F, the AIF and the Circular into the F-10.

|                     | /s/
      Matthew P. Reilly             
|-------------------- | ----------------------------------------
|                     | Matthew P. Reilly, Professional Engineer
|                     |                                         
|                     |                                         
|Date: March 28, 2014 |                                         

---
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23
- 6354

THOMAS DAVIS INGRAM, JR. , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 5:22

- hc

- 02198

- BO

- RJ )

Submitted : August 29 , 2023 Decided: September 1, 2023

Before KING, AGEE, and BENJAMIN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Thomas Davis Ingram, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6354 Doc: 6 Filed: 09/01/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Thomas Davis Ingram, Jr., a North Carolina pretrial deta inee, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealabil ity will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists c ould find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis , 580 U.S. 100, 115

- 17 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedu ral ruling is debatabl e and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Ingram has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials bef ore this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 23-6354 Doc: 6 Filed: 09/01/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 32418]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13668]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE



Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers




Notice of Intent To Grant Partially Exclusive License of the 

United States Patent Application No. 12/243,084, Filed October 01, 

2008, Entitled: Soluble Salt Produced From a Biopolymer and a Process 

for Producing the Salt



AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.



ACTION: Notice of intent.



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



SUMMARY: In accordance with 37 CFR 404.7(a)(1)(i), announcement is made 

of a prospective exclusive license of the following U.S. Patent 

Application 12/243,084 Filed October 1, 2008.



DATES: Written objections must be filed not later than 15 days 

following publication of this announcement.



ADDRESSES: United States Army Engineer Research and Development Center, 

ATTN: CEERD-ZA-T (Ms. Bea Shahin), 2902 Newmark Drive, Champaign, IL 

6182-1076.



FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Bea Shahin (217) 373-7234, FAX 

(217) 373-7210, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2a684f4b04790479424b4243446a5f594b494f044b58475304474346"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="16547377384538457e777e7f785663657775733877647b6f387b7f7a">[email protected]</span></a>.



SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This patent application claims a method by 

which a biologically natural material can be produced in bioreactors 

and transformed for use as a dry solid. The resulting biopolymer 

material can be used in place of synthetic, petroleum-based polymers 

for soil amendment applications to achieve increased soil strength, 

reduced air transport, and decreased soil erosion. During processing, 

the biopolymer also can be functionalized to improve its adsorption of 

heavy metals.



Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2010-13668 Filed 6-7-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3720-58-P




</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 513 Filed: 02/20/19 Entered: 02/20/19 15:34:25 Page 1 of 4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 513 Filed: 02/20/19 Entered: 02/20/19 15:34:25 Page 2 of 4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 513 Filed: 02/20/19 Entered: 02/20/19 15:34:25 Page 3 of 4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 513 Filed: 02/20/19 Entered: 02/20/19 15:34:25 Page 4 of 4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5068 Filed: 12/11/19 Entered: 12/11/19 10:31:08 Page 1 of

1
#### Henry Laraby, Appellant, v. William M. Pellett, Respondent, Impleaded, etc.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Opinion by

Follett, J.
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 21 (Tuesday, February 2, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 5420]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-01843]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration


Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Pacific Fishery Management Council (Pacific Council) will 
convene a meeting of its Coastal Pelagic Species (CPS) Subcommittee of 
the Scientific and Statistical Committee (SSC). The meeting is open to 
the public.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, March 10, 2016, from 8 a.m. 
to 5 p.m. Pacific Standard Time.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Doubletree by Hilton 
Sacramento, Yuba River Room, 2001 Point West Way, Sacramento, CA 95815.
    Council address: Pacific Fishery Management Council, 7700 NE 
Ambassador Place, Suite 101, Portland, OR 97220.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kerry Griffin, Staff Officer; 
telephone: (503) 820-2409.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The primary purpose of the meeting is to 
review a stock assessment update of the Pacific sardine resource. The 
SSC CPS subcommittee will conduct the review, and one member each from 
the CPS Management Team and CPS Advisory Subpanel will serve as 
advisers. The Council will set harvest specifications and management 
measures at its April 9-14, 2016 meeting in Vancouver, WA.

Special Accommodations

    Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Mr. Kris Kleinschmidt (503) 820-2280 at least 5 
days prior to the meeting date.

     Dated: January 28, 2016.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-01843 Filed 2-1-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 239 (Wednesday, December 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 64031]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30294]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Proposed Amendments to the Courts of Criminal Appeals Rules of 
Practice and Procedure

AGENCY: U.S. Army Legal Services Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A joint committee representing the respective Courts of 
Criminal Appeals of the Air Force, Army, Navy-Marine Corps, and Coast 
Guard has drafted proposed changes to the joint Rules of Practice and 
Procedure for the Courts of Criminal Appeals (formerly named Courts of 
Military Review). The current rules are published at 32 CFR 150.1. The 
proposed changes will be submitted to the respective Judge Advocate 
Generals for approval and promulgation pursuant to Article 66(f) of the 
Uniform Code of Military Justice. Persons interested in reviewing the 
proposed amendments may obtain a copy by telephoning the Clerk of 
Court, U.S. Army Court of Criminal Appeals, Area Code 703, 681-6888.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Written comments or suggestions should be sent by mail so as to reach 
the Clerk of Court, Attention: Mr. Fulton, U.S. Army Court of Criminal 
Appeals, Nassif Building Room 204A, 5611 Columbia Pike, Falls Church, 
VA 22041-5013, on or before January 15, 1996.
Gregory D. Showalter,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-30294 Filed 12-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M