alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.1

    


    STONERIDGE,
INC.

    LONG-TERM
INCENTIVE PLAN

    AMENDMENT
TO

    RESTRICTED
SHARES GRANT AGREEMENT

     

    Recitals

     

    1.           Stoneridge,
Inc., an Ohio corporation (the “Company”) and __________________ (“Grantee”) are
parties to a Restricted Shares Grant Agreement dated February 25, 2007 (the
“RSGA”).

     

    2.           Pursuant
to the pursuant to the terms and conditions RSGA the Grantee was granted Common
Shares, without par value, of the Company (the “Restricted
Shares”).

     

    3.           The
grant of Restricted Shares under the RSGA was comprised of two separate mutually
exclusive parts, Award I (time-based restricted shares) and Award II
(performance-based restricted shares).

     

    4.           In
the event of a Change in Control the Award II Restricted Shares conditioned the
lapse of the risk of forfeiture (vesting) on the price of the Company’s Common
Shares, calculated by the average of the closing price of the Common Shares for
the ten trading days immediately preceding the date of the Change in Control,
being equal to or greater than $6.05 per share.

     

    5.           The
$6.05 price floor condition in the event of a Change in Control was a holdover
in the form of grant agreement from a prior year and Compensation Committee has
determined that it should not be applied to awards of restricted common shares
made in 2007.

     

    Amendment

     

    The RSGA is hereby amended by deleting
subsection 5(b) in its entirety and replacing it with the
following:

     

    “5(b)        a
Change in Control of the Company (as defined in the Plan); subject to the
proviso below, or”

     

    The
remainder of the RSGA shall remain unchanged.

    IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused its corporate name to be subscribed by
its duly authorized officer as of the 3rd day of May, 2009.

     

    
      
        
          
            
              	 
      	 
      	
                      STONERIDGE,
      INC.

                    
	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      	
                      By

                    	
                        

                    
	 
      	 
      	 
      	
                      John
      Corey

                    
	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
                      The
      foregoing is hereby accepted.

                    	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
                        

                    	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
                      (Signature)
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5452 

To amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act to clarify the ability to use consumer 

reports in certain cases to establish and enforce child support payments. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 

Mr. DUFFY (for himself and Mr. MURPHY of Florida) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act to clarify the ability 

to use consumer reports in certain cases to establish 

and enforce child support payments. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Child Support Assist5 ance Act of 2014’’. 

6 SEC. 2. USE OF CONSUMER REPORTS BY STATE OR LOCAL 

7 CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES. 

8 Section 604(a) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 

9 U.S.C. 1681b(a)) is amended— 

10 (1) in paragraph (4)— 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5452 IH

1 (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘or 

2 determining the appropriate level of such pay3 ments’’ and inserting ‘‘, determining the appro4 priate level of such payments, or enforcing a 

5 child support order, award, agreement, or judg6 ment’’; 

7 (B) in subparagraph (B), by adding ‘‘and’’ 

8 at the end; 

9 (C) by striking subparagraph (C); and 

10 (D) by redesignating subparagraph (D) as 

11 subparagraph (C); 

12 (2) by striking paragraph (5); and 

13 (3) by redesignating paragraph (6) as para14 graph (5). 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-2342

MELESSE HUNDE,

Petitioner,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A78-155-154)

Submitted: June 18, 2004 Decided: August 9, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David A. Garfield, LAW OFFICES OF DAVID GARFIELD, Washington, D.C.,

for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General,

Richard M. Evans, Assistant Director, Carl H. McIntyre, Jr., Senior

Litigation Counsel, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Melesse Hunde, a native and citizen of Ethiopia,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (“Board”) affirming, without opinion, the immigration

judge’s order denying his applications for asylum, withholding of

removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture.

In his petition for review, Hunde raises challenges to

the immigration judge’s determination that he failed to establish

his eligibility for asylum. To obtain reversal of a determination

denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must show that the

evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable

factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.”

INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992). We have

reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that Hunde fails to

show that the evidence compels a contrary result. Accordingly, we

cannot grant the relief that he seeks.

Additionally, we uphold the immigration judge’s denial of

Hunde’s request for withholding of removal. The standard for

withholding of removal is more stringent than that for granting

asylum. Chen v. INS, 195 F.3d 198, 205 (4th Cir. 1999). To

qualify for withholding of removal, an applicant must demonstrate

“a clear probability of persecution.” INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca, 480

U.S. 421, 430 (1987). Because Hunde fails to show that he is
- 3 -

eligible for asylum, he cannot meet the higher standard for

withholding of removal. 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 17 (Wednesday, January 27, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 4269]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-1381]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0605; Airspace Docket No. 09-ASO-19]


Establishment of Class E Airspace; Clayton, GA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action confirms the effective date of a direct final rule 
published in the Federal Register September 14, 2009 that establishes 
Class E Airspace at Heaven's Landing Airport, Clayton, GA.

DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC, January 27, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melinda Giddens, Operations Support 
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O. 
Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404) 305-5610.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Confirmation of Effective Date

    The FAA published this direct final rule with a request for 
comments in the Federal Register on September 14, 2009 (74 FR 46893), 
Docket No. FAA-2009-0605; Airspace Docket 09-ASO-19. The FAA uses the 
direct final rulemaking procedure for a non-controversial rule where 
the FAA believes that there will be no adverse public comment. This 
direct final rule advised the public that no adverse comments were 
anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, or a written 
notice of intent to submit such an adverse comment, were received 
within the comment period, the regulation would become effective on 
December 17, 2009. No adverse comments were received, and thus this 
notice confirms that effective date.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on January 14, 2010.
Myron A. Knight,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air 
Traffic Organization.
[FR Doc. 2010-1381 Filed 1-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
EXHIBIT A-22 

Exhibit A-22 Page 598

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-23 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page 1

of 22
Exhibit A-22 Page 599

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-23 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page 2

of 22
Exhibit A-22 Page 600

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-23 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page 3

of 22
Exhibit A-22 Page 601

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-23 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page 4

of 22
Exhibit A-22 Page 602

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-23 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page 5

of 22
Exhibit A-22 Page 603

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-23 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page 6

of 22
Exhibit A-22 Page 604

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-23 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page 7

of 22
Exhibit A-22 Page 605

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-23 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page 8

of 22
Exhibit A-22 Page 606

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-23 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page 9

of 22
Exhibit A-22 Page 607

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-23 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

10 of 22
Exhibit A-22 Page 608

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-23 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

11 of 22
Exhibit A-22 Page 609

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-23 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

12 of 22
Exhibit A-22 Page 610

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-23 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

13 of 22
Exhibit A-22 Page 611

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-23 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

14 of 22
Exhibit A-22 Page 612

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-23 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

15 of 22
Exhibit A-22 Page 613

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-23 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

16 of 22
Exhibit A-22 Page 614

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-23 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

17 of 22
Exhibit A-22 Page 615

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-23 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

18 of 22
Exhibit A-22 Page 616

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-23 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

19 of 22
Exhibit A-22 Page 617

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-23 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

20 of 22
Exhibit A-22 Page 618

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-23 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

21 of 22
Exhibit A-22 Page 619

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-23 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

22 of 22
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - 14 CFR Part 71
          - [Docket No. FAA-2010-0249; Airspace Docket No. 10-ASO-22]

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

# SUMMARY:

                        This action confirms the effective date of a direct final rule published in the                         **Federal Register**                         April 1, 2010 that establishes Class E airspace at Tyndall AFB, Panama City, FL.                    

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         0901 UTC, June 8, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Melinda Giddens, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O. Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404) 305-5610.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Confirmation of Effective Date

                    The FAA published this direct final rule with a request for comments in the                     **Federal Register**                     on April 1, 2010 (75 FR 16331), Docket No. FAA-2010-0249; Airspace Docket No. 10-ASO-22. The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would become effective on June 3, 2010. No adverse comments were received, and thus this notice confirms that effective date.                

Issued in College Park, Georgia, on May 27, 2010.

Barry A. Knight,

Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic Organization.

[FR Doc. 2010-13635 Filed 6-7-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5481 

To continue the use of a 3-month quarter EHR reporting period for health 

care providers to demonstrate meaningful use for 2015 under the Medicare and Medicaid EHR incentive payment programs, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 16, 2014 

Mrs. ELLMERS (for herself and Mr. MATHESON) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in 

addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To continue the use of a 3-month quarter EHR reporting 

period for health care providers to demonstrate meaningful use for 2015 under the Medicare and Medicaid EHR 

incentive payment programs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5481 IH

1 SECTION 1. CONTINUING USE OF 3-MONTH QUARTER EHR 

2 REPORTING PERIODS FOR PROFESSIONALS 

3 AND HOSPITALS TO DEMONSTRATE MEAN4 INGFUL USE FOR 2015 UNDER THE MEDICARE 

5 AND MEDICAID EHR INCENTIVE PAYMENT 

6 PROGRAMS. 

7 In specifying the EHR reporting period under part 

8 495 of title 42, Code of Federal Regulations, for purposes 

9 of titles XVIII and XIX of the Social Security Act, the 

10 Secretary of Health and Human Services shall continue 

11 through 2015 (in the case of eligible professionals) and 

12 fiscal year 2015 (in the case of eligible hospitals and crit13 ical access hospitals) to permit the use of a 3-month quar14 ter EHR reporting period to demonstrate meaningful use 

15 for purposes of such part, without regard to the payment 

16 year or the stage of meaningful use criteria involved. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5327 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5327

   To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to prohibit work by 
   children in tobacco-related agriculture as particularly hazardous 
                        oppressive child labor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 31, 2014

 Mr. Cicilline (for himself, Ms. Norton, and Mr. Grijalva) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education 
                           and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to prohibit work by 
   children in tobacco-related agriculture as particularly hazardous 
                        oppressive child labor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TOBACCO-RELATED AGRICULTURE EMPLOYMENT OF CHILDREN.

    Section 3(l) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 
203(l)) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``Any employment 
in which children under the age of 18 come into direct contact with 
tobacco plants or dried tobacco leaves shall be considered particularly 
hazardous oppressive child labor within the meaning of this 
subsection.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 110 (Wednesday, June 9, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32812-32813]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13839]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CA-920-1310-FI; CACA 44900]


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease 
CACA 44900, California

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas 
Leases.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 
3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a 
petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease CACA 44900 from NW. 
Lost Hills Petroleum Holdings, LLC. The petition was filed on time and 
was accompanied by all required rentals and royalties accruing from 
February 1, 2010, the date of termination.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rita Altamira, Land Law Examiner, 
Branch of Adjudication, Division of Energy and Minerals, BLM California 
State Office, 2800 Cottage Way, W-1623, Sacramento, California 95825, 
(916) 978-4378.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: No valid lease has been issued affecting the 
lands. The lessee has agreed to new lease terms for rentals and 
royalties at rates of $10 per acre or fraction thereof and 16\2/3\ 
percent, respectively. The lessee has paid the required $500 
administrative fee and has reimbursed the BLM for the cost of this 
Federal Register notice. The Lessee has met all the requirements for 
reinstatement of the lease as set out in Sections 31(d) and

[[Page 32813]]

(e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau 
of Land Management is proposing to reinstate the lease effective 
February 1, 2010, subject to the original terms and conditions of the 
lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above.

Debra Marsh,
Supervisor, Branch of Adjudication, Division of Energy & Minerals.
[FR Doc. 2010-13839 Filed 6-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P
Exhibit
10.2


 


AMENDMENT


TO


COURIER CORPORATION


2005 STOCK EQUITY PLAN FOR


NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS


 


A.                                   The Courier
Corporation 2005 Stock Equity Plan for Non-employee Directors (the “Plan”),
effective November 3, 2004, amended December 7, 2006, is hereby amended
pursuant to the authority reserved in Section 9 thereof:


 


a.               Section 7(e) (Method
of Exercise) is hereby amended by adding the following paragraph at the end
thereof:


 


“Alternatively, the Participant may choose to exercise
his or her Option by means of a “net exercise” arrangement pursuant to which
the Company will reduce the number of shares of Stock issuable upon exercise by
the largest whole number of shares with a Fair Market Value that does not
exceed the aggregate exercise price.”


 


B.                                     Except as amended
herein, the Plan is confirmed in all other respects.


 


C.                                     The effective
date of this Amendment is July 15, 2009.


 


Approved
by the Board of Directors, July 15, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 234 (Wednesday, December 6, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 62467]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-29705]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1074-DR]


Florida; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Florida (FEMA-1074-DR), dated October 27, 1995, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 28, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pauline C. Campbell, Response and 
Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, 
DC 20472, (202) 646-3606.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of Florida, is hereby amended to include the following area among those 
areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe 
declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of 
October 27, 1995:

    Palm Beach County for Public Assistance (already designated for 
Individual Assistance and Hazard Mitigation Assistance).

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance.)
James L. Witt,
Director.
[FR Doc. 95-29705 Filed 12-5-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DARWIN A. DAVIS,

Appellant,

v.

ALICIA C. DAVIS,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-2440

[September 15, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Peter Holden, Judge; L.T. Case No. FMCE-12-010463

(36).

Gustavo E. Frances of The Law Office of Gustavo E. Frances, P.A., Fort 

Lauderdale, for appellant.

Ryan C. Tyler and Kimberly L. Boldt of Ratzan, Weissman & Boldt, Boca 

Raton, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, KLINGENSMITH and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statement No. 333-149955 on Form S-8, pertaining to the MEMSIC, Inc. 2000 Omnibus Stock Plan and the MEMSIC, Inc. 2007 Stock Incentive Plan, of MEMSIC, Inc. of our report dated March 27, 2009, with respect tothe consolidated financial statements of MEMSIC, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K), for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Boston, Massachusetts 

March 27, 2009