alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5631 

To authorize the Central Everglades Planning Project, Florida, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 

Mr. MURPHY of Florida (for himself, Mr. JOLLY, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, 

Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Ms. BROWN of Florida, Ms. FRANKEL of 

Florida, Mr. GARCIA, Mr. DEUTCH, and Mr. POSEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 

Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To authorize the Central Everglades Planning Project, 

Florida, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERP, CENTRAL EVERGLADES PLANNING 

4 PROJECT, FLORIDA. 

5 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—The project for environmental 

6 restoration, CERP, Central Everglades Planning Project, 

7 Florida, is authorized to be carried out by the Secretary 

8 of the Army substantially in accordance with the plans, 

9 and subject to the conditions, recommended in a final reVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:39 Oct 03, 2014 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5631.IH H5631

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5631 IH

1 port of the Chief of Engineers if a favorable report of the 

2 Chief of Engineers is completed not later than December 

3 30, 2015. 

4 (b) TOTAL COST.—The project authorized pursuant 

5 to paragraph (1) is authorized to be carried out by the 

6 Secretary of the Army at a total cost of $1,900,000,000, 

7 with an estimated Federal cost of $950,875,000 and an 

8 estimated non-Federal cost of $949,125,000. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5639 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5639

To strengthen the disclosure requirements for creditors under the Truth 
                            in Lending Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 18, 2014

 Mr. Price of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To strengthen the disclosure requirements for creditors under the Truth 
                            in Lending Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Online Credit Card Disclosure Act of 
2014''.

SEC. 2. ONLINE PAYMENT TIMING DISCLOSURES.

    Section 127(b)(11)(D) of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 
1637(b)(11)(D)) is amended--
            (1) in clause (i), by striking ``; and'' and inserting a 
        semicolon;
            (2) in clause (ii), by striking the period and inserting 
        ``; and''; and
            (3) by inserting at the end the following new clause:
                            ``(iii) if the consumer has an online 
                        account with the creditor under the consumer 
                        credit plan, be disclosed in a conspicuous and 
                        prominent location on a webpage of such 
                        creditor.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Edward Murphy, Appellant, v. Chilion M. Farrar and another, Respondents.

Judgment affirmed.

Opinion by

Bradley, J.;

Haight, J., not sitting.
EXHIBIT F 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4758-6 Filed: 11/15/19 Entered: 11/15/19 10:11:43 Page 1

of 2
Exhibit F 

Summary, by Matter Category, of Fees Budgeted and Fees Incurred During the Fee Per

Matter 

Number 

Project Category 

Description 

Hours Total Compensation 

Budgeted Billed Budgeted Billed Expenses 

020 Legislative Issues 500 263.1 $431,425.00 $223,745.50 - 021 Non-Bankruptcy Litigation / Wildfire (Criminal) 30,575 11,005.7 $15,703,375.00 $6,676,888.50 - 022 Non-Working Travel 240 196.7 $222,225.00 $193,596.00 - 023 

Purchase Power Agreements 

(including Adversary 

Proceedings)

360 238.5 $340,850.00 $178,923.00 - 

025 Regulatory Issues 5,060 1,798.3 $3,682,125.00 $1,511,479.50 - 026 Retention / Billing / Fee Applications: MTO 240 192.3 $197,550.00 $135,803.50 - 033 TUB - Tubbs Fire state court litigation (Judge Jackson) N/A 400.8 N/A $345,779.50 - 

Credit (1/29 – 5/31) ($14,480.00) 

Total 36,975 14,095.4 $20,577,550.00 $9,251,735.50 $116,004.1

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4758-6 Filed: 11/15/19 Entered: 11/15/19 10:11:43 Pag

of 2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 238 (Tuesday, December 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 63700]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30195]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-62-000]

ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff
December 6, 1995.
    Take notice that on November 30, 1995 ANR Pipeline Company 
(``ANR'') tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second 
Revised Volume No. 1 (``Tariff''), the following tariff sheets, to 
become effective December 1, 1995:
Title Page to Tariff
Tenth Revised Sheet No. 8
Twelfth Revised Sheet No. 9
Twelfth Revised Sheet No. 13
Twelfth Revised Sheet No. 16
Fourteenth Revised Sheet No. 18
Third Revised Sheet No. 185
    The proposed changes would increase proposed Quarterly Dakota 
Above-Market cost recoveries from $9.3 million to $9.7 million based 
upon costs incurred from August, 1995 to October, 1995.
    ANR states that the above-referenced tariff sheets are being filed 
pursuant to the approved recovery mechanism of its Tariff to implement 
recovery of $9.7 million of costs that are associated with its 
obligations to Dakota Gasification Company (``Dakota'').
    ANR proposes a reservation fee surcharge applicable to its Part 284 
firm transportation customers to collect ninety percent (90%) of the 
Dakota costs and an adjustment to the maximum base tariff rates of Rate 
Schedule ITS and overrun rates applicable to Rate Schedule FTS-2 so as 
to recover the remaining ten percent (10%).
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C., 20426, 
in accordance with 18 CFR 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. Pursuant to Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
regulations, all such motions or protests must be filed not later than 
12 days after the date of the filings noted above. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-30195 Filed 12-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of NetTalk.com, Inc., a
Florida corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the ending December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Guillermo Rodriguez, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|/s/ Anastasios Kyriakides                                                    | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Anastasios Kyriakides                                                        | 
|Chief Financial Officer
        (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) | 
|                                                                             | 
|Date: September 4, 2013                                                      |
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 239 (Wednesday, December 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 64062]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30104]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-5343-9]


Proposed Administrative Cost Recovery Agreement Under Section 
122(h)(1) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and 
Liability Act, Regarding the Hooker Chemical/Rucco Polymer Site, 
Hicksville, NY

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of proposed administrative agreement and opportunity for 
public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 122(i) of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as 
amended (``CERCLA''), 42 U.S.C. 9622(i), the U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency (``EPA'') Region II announces a proposed 
administrative settlement pursuant to Section 122(h)(1) of CERCLA, 42 
U.S.C. 9622(h)(1), relating to the Hooker Chemical/Ruco Polymer Site 
(the ``Site''), Hicksville, Nassau County, New York. This Site is on 
the National Priorities List established pursuant to Section 105(a) of 
CERCLA. This notice is being published to inform the public of the 
proposed settlement and of the opportunity to comment.
    The settlement, memorialized in an Administrative Cost Recovery 
Agreement (``Agreement''), is being entered into by EPA and Occidental 
Chemical Corporation and Ruco Polymer Corporation (the 
``Respondents''). Under the Agreement, the Respondents shall pay EPA 
the sum of $124,665.00 in further reimbursement of EPA's response costs 
incurred and paid with respect to the Site on or prior to August 16, 
1994. In response to EPAs cost recovery demands, Occidental Chemical 
Corp. had previously reimbursed EPA for $883,813.00 of the Agency's 
response costs at the Site.

DATES: EPA will accept written comments relating to the proposed 
settlement on or before January 12, 1996.

ADDRESSES AND FURTHER INFORMATION: Comments should reference the Hooker 
Chemical/Ruco Polymer Site and EPA Index No. II-CERCLA-95-0216. 
Comments and any requests for further information, including requests 
for a copy of the Agreement, should be sent to: Marla E. Wieder, 
Assistant Regional Counsel, New York/Caribbean Superfund Branch, Office 
of Regional Counsel, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 290 
Broadway, 17th Floor, New York, New York, 10007-1866, Telephone: (212) 
637-3185.

    Dated: November 14, 1995.
Jeanne M. Fox,
Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 95-30104 Filed 12-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7414

WILLIAM M. BRYSON, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-03-2721-8-20)

Submitted: February 19, 2004 Decided: February 25, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William M. Bryson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Mark C. Moore, Assistant

United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina; Regan Alexandra

Pendleton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

William M. Bryson, Jr., appeals from the district court’s

order denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United

States v. Morgan, 346 U.S. 502, 511 (1954) (finding writ available

only to correct fundamental error where no other remedy is

available); United States v. Mandel, 862 F.2d 1067, 1075 (4th Cir.

1988) (same); United States v. Taylor, 648 F.2d 565, 572 (9th Cir.

1981) (writ available where direct appeal pending only in

extraordinary circumstances). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 15.1


CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-153304 on Form F-3 and No. 333-156843 on Form F-3 of our reports dated April
15, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Star Bulk
Carriers Corp., and its subsidiaries (the "Company"), and the effectiveness of
the Company's internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31,
2008.
   /s/
Deloitte
 
 Deloitte.
 Hadjipavlou,
Sofianos & Cambanis S.A.
 Athens,
Greece
 
 April
15, 2009
SCWC

- 17

- 0000701

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI  I

________________________________________________________________

STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I, Respondent/Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

ANTHONY G. BEAUDET

- CLOSE, Petitioner/Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP

- 17

- 0000701; CR. NO. 3PC16100368K)

ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Polla ck, and Wilson, JJ.)

It appearing that the judgment on appeal in the above

referenced matter not having been filed by the Intermediate

Court of Appeals at the time the application for writ of

certiorari was filed, see Hawai  i Revised Statutes § 602

- 59

(2016); see also Hawai  i Rules of Appellate Procedure (“HRAP”)

Rule 36(b)(1) (2016),

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner/Defendant

Appellant Anthony G. Beaudet

- Close’s application for writ of

certiorari, filed on December 21, 2018, is dismissed without

prejudice to re

- filing the application pursuant to HRAP Rule Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-17-0000701 02-JAN-2019 02:29 PM2

40.1(a) (2017 ). (“The application shall be filed within 30 days

after the filing of the intermediate court of appeals’ judgment

on appeal or dismissal order, unless th e time for filing the

application is extended in accordance with this Rule.”).

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai  i, January 2 , 2019

.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/ s/ Michael D. Wilson
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 239 (Wednesday, December 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 64096]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30274]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Commissioner's Advisory Group: Public Meeting

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of Public Meeting of Commissioner's Advisory Group.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Public meeting of the Commissioner's Advisory Group will be 
held in Washington, D.C. This meeting is being scheduled due to the 
cancellation of the previously announced November 16, 1995, CAG 
meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held January 30, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia Washburn, C:I, 1111 
Constitution Avenue, N.W., Room 7046 IR, Washington, D.C. 20224. 
Telephone No. (202) 622-5026 (not a toll-free number).
    Notice is hereby given that a public meeting of the Commissioner's 
Advisory Group previously scheduled for November 16, 1995, beginning at 
10:00 am in Room 3313, main Internal Revenue Service building, 1111 
Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20224, was cancelled due to 
the Federal government shutdown.
    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988), that a public meeting of 
the Commissioner's Advisory Group will be held on January 30, 1996, 
beginning at 10:00 am in Room 3313, main Internal Revenue Service 
building, 1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20224.
    The agenda will include the following topics:

Filing Season Readiness
Improving Services to Customers
Small Business Issues and Initiatives
Compliance Issues
Corporate Education Issues

    Note: Last minute changes to the agenda or order of topic 
discussion are possible and could prevent effective advance notice.

    The meeting will be in a room that accommodates approximately 50 
people, including members of the Commissioner's Advisory Group and IRS 
officials. Due to the limited conference space, notification of intent 
to attend the meeting must be made with Lorenza Wilds, no later than 
January 23, 1996. Ms. Wilds can be reached on (202) 622-5026 (not toll-
free).
    If you would like to have the Committee consider a written 
statement, please call or write: Patricia Washburn, Office of Public 
Liaison, C:I, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W., 
Room 7046 IR, Washington, D.C. 20224.
Margaret Milner Richardson,
Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
[FR Doc. 95-30274 Filed 12-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-U
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6036** 

STEPHEN MARK HAUSE , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. DAYNE PHILLIPS, Assistant Public Defender, in his Individual and Official Capacities on behalf of the Lexington County Public Defender ’ s Office , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia

. Richard M

. Gergel , District Judge. ( 3:13

- cv
- 02743

- RMG )

Submitted : April 24, 2014 Decided: April 30, 2014

Before WILKINSON and MOTZ , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Stephen Mark Hause , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 P ER CURIAM:
Stephen Mark Hause appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ § 1915(e)(2)(B) , 1915A (20 12 ). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Hause v. Phillips , No.

3:13

- cv
- 02743

- RMG (D.S.C. Dec. 18, 2013). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and lega l contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Andrew J. Dann, Respondent, v. Augustus L. Smith, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed.

Opinion by

Barker, J.;

Bradley J., not sitting.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4861 Filed: 10/23/19 Entered: 11/25/19 14:28:34 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4861 Filed: 10/23/19 Entered: 11/25/19 14:28:34 Page 2 of

2
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-143451 on Form S-3
of our reports dated February 27, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements of KKR Financial Holdings LLC and subsidiaries (the "Company"), and the effectiveness of the
Company's internal control over financial reporting (which report on the consolidated financial statements expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the
Company's adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157,Fair Value Measurements, and Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 159,The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial LiabilitiesIncluding an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 115, effective January 1, 2007), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of KKR Financial Holdings LLC for the year ended
December 31, 2008.

/s/
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San
Francisco, California
March 2, 2009

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 31

                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a
                           14(a)/15D-14(a) and SECTION
                          302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


I, Joey DiFrancesco, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive
officer) and principal financial officer of Raven Moon Entertainment, Inc. (the
"Registrant"), certify that:


1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant.


2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;


4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I am responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:


         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;


         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and


         c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;


5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):


         a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and


         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and





Dated: August 19, 2004                      /s/  Joseph DiFrancesco
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Joseph DiFrancesco, President,
                                                 Chief Executive Officer and
                                                 principal financial officer