alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 21 (Tuesday, February 2, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 5432]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-01809]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Commission Staff Attendance

    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) hereby gives 
notice that members of the Commission's staff may attend the following 
meeting related to the transmission planning activities of the New York 
Independent System Operator, Inc.

The New York Independent System Operator, Inc. Electric System Planning 
Working Group Meeting

January 28, 2016, 10:00 a.m.-3:00 p.m. (EST)

    The above-referenced meeting will be via web conference and 
teleconference.
    The above-referenced meeting is open to stakeholders.
    Further information may be found at: http://www.nyiso.com/public/markets_operations/services/planning/index.jsp.

The New York Independent System Operator, Inc. Joint Electric System 
Planning Working Group and Transmission Planning Advisory Meeting

February 5, 2016, 10:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m. (EST)

    The above-referenced meeting will be via web conference and 
teleconference.
    The above-referenced meeting is open to stakeholders.
    Further information may be found at: http://www.nyiso.com/public/markets_operations/services/planning/index.jsp.

The New York Independent System Operator, Inc. Electric System Planning 
Working Group Meeting

February 25, 2016, 10:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m. (EST)

    The above-referenced meeting will be via web conference and 
teleconference.
    The above-referenced meeting is open to stakeholders.
    Further information may be found at: http://www.nyiso.com/public/markets_operations/services/planning/index.jsp.
    The discussions at the meeting described above may address matters 
at issue in the following proceedings:
    New York Independent System Operator, Inc., Docket No. ER13-102.
    New York Independent System Operator, Inc., Docket No. ER15-2059.
    New York Independent System Operator, Inc., Docket No. ER16-120.
    New York Transco, LLC, Docket No. ER15-572.
    For more information, contact James Eason, Office of Energy Market 
Regulation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission at (202) 502-8622 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#86cce7ebe3f5a8c3e7f5e9e8c6e0e3f4e5a8e1e9f0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="692308040c1a472c081a0607290f0c1b0a470e061f">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: January 21, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-01809 Filed 2-1-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32


    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Raven Moon Entertainment, Inc.
(the "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Joey DiFrancesco, President, Chief Executive Officer and principal
financial officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Registrant.


Dated: November 12, 2004


                                            /s/  Joey DiFrancesco
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Joey DiFrancesco, President,
                                                 Chief Executive Officer and
                                                 principal financial officer
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 32506]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13747]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE



Drug Enforcement Administration




Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration



    By Notice dated October 20, 2009 and published in the Federal 

Register on October 28, 2009 (74 FR 55583), Cody Laboratories, Inc., 

601 Yellowstone Avenue, Cody, Wyoming 82414-9321, made application by 

renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered 

as an importer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed in 

schedule II:



------------------------------------------------------------------------

                    Drug                               Schedule

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Raw Opium (9600)...........................  II

Concentrate of Poppy Straw (9670)..........  II

------------------------------------------------------------------------



    The company plans to import narcotic raw materials for 

manufacturing and further distribution to its customers. The company is 

registered with DEA as a manufacturer of several controlled substances 

that are manufactured from raw opium, poppy straw, and concentrate of 

poppy straw.

    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 

the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and 952(a), and determined that the 

registration of Cody Laboratories, Inc. to import the basic classes of 

controlled substances is consistent with the public interest, and with 

United States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or 

protocols in effect on May 1, 1971. DEA has investigated Cody 

Laboratories, Inc. to ensure that the company's registration is 

consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included 

inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, 

verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and 

a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant 

to 21 U.S.C. 952(a) and 958(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34, 

the above named company is granted registration as an importer of the 

basic classes of controlled substances listed.



    Dated: May 28, 2010.

Joseph T. Rannazzisi,

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 

Enforcement Administration.

[FR Doc. 2010-13747 Filed 6-7-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
#### Mary J. Ray and others, Appellants, v. John D. Mills and others, Respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs in favor of respondents against appellants, payable out of their shares. Decision as of May first, of April term. Opinion by

Follett, J.
#### Vijai B. Pandey *vs.*The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company & others1 (and a companion case2).

November 7, 1995.

*Supreme Judicial Court,*

Superintendence of inferior courts.

1

Textron, Inc.; Timothy P. Wickstrom; and Tashjian, Simsarian & Wickstrom. The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company does not appear to be a party to these appeals.

2

The companion case involves the same parties. A single justice granted the defendants’ motion for stay of appeal and consolidation.

The plaintiff is appealing from the denial of relief in the county court of two separate petitions brought under G. L. c. 211, § 3 (1994 ed.). In both petitions, the plaintiff sought reversal of a Superior Court order which allowed the defendants’ motion to vacate default judgments entered against them on October 21, 1993, pursuant to Mass. R. Civ. P. 33 (a), as amended, 368 Mass. 906 (1976), for failure to reply promptly to interrogatories.

Relief pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3, is not available to the plaintiff. See *Planned Parenthood League of Mass., Inc.*v. *Operation Rescue,*406 Mass. 701, 706 (1990) (outlining standard for G. L. c. 211, § 3, review). The plaintiff has not articulated a “substantial claim of violation of [his] substantive rights.” *Id.,*quoting *Dunbrack*v. *Commonwealth,*398 Mass. 502, 504 (1986). See also *Pandey*v. *Roulston,*419 Mass. 1010, 1010-1011 (1995) . Moreover, the plaintiff’s claims could have been adequately reviewed on appeal.3 See *Foley*v. *Lowell Div. of the Dist. Court Dep’t,*398 Mass. 800, 802 (1986) (explaining that G. L. c. 211, § 3, relief is “extraordinary and may not be sought as a substitute for normal appellate review”). See also *Pandey*v. *Superior Court,*412 Mass. 1001 (1992); *Pandey*v. *Roulston, supra*at 1011. Therefore, we affirm the judgments.

*So ordered.*

*1005*Vi jai B. Pandey,*pro se.

*Philip J. Callan, Jr.,*for the defendants.

3

We do not reach the question whether the appeals have been rendered moot by the Appeals Court’s memorandum and order of September 25, 1995, pursuant to its Rule 1:28 which affirmed the judgments for the defendants in the underlying case that gave rise to the petitions. See *Pandey*v. *Paul Revere Life Ins. Co.,*39 Mass. App. Ct. 1108 (1995).
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5545 

To reauthorize the Federal Ocean Acidification Research and Monitoring 

Act of 2009. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 

Mr. FARR (for himself, Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, and Mrs. CAPPS) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science, Space, 

and Technology 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Federal Ocean Acidification Research and 

Monitoring Act of 2009. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF FEDERAL OCEAN ACIDI4 FICATION RESEARCH AND MONITORING ACT 

5 OF 2009. 

6 Section 12409 of the Federal Ocean Acidification Re7 search and Monitoring Act of 2009 (33 U.S.C. 3708) is 

8 amended— 

9 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘this subtitle’’ 

10 and all that follows through paragraph (4) and inVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:05 Sep 27, 2014 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5545.IH H5545

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5545 IH

1 serting ‘‘this subtitle $20,000,000 for each of fiscal 

2 years 2015 through 2018.’’; and 

3 (2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘this subtitle’’ 

4 and all that follows through paragraph (4) and in5 serting ‘‘this subtitle $15,000,000 for each of fiscal 

6 years 2015 through 2018.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6637

JIMMY LEE WILLIAMS,

 Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

WARDEN LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,

 Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. 

(5:15-cv-02106-MGL)

Submitted: August 18, 2016 Decided: August 13, 2016

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jimmy Lee Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Melody Jane Brown, 

Assistant Attorney General, Donald John Zelenka, Senior 

Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jimmy Lee Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to deny

relief on Williams’ 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The 

district court’s order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5735 

To facilitate the expedited review of applications of aliens applying for admission to the United States under section 101(a)(15)(J) who are coming 

to the United States to participate in a program under which they 

will receive graduate medical education or training. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2014 

Ms. MENG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To facilitate the expedited review of applications of aliens 

applying for admission to the United States under section 101(a)(15)(J) who are coming to the United States 

to participate in a program under which they will receive 

graduate medical education or training. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Grant Residency for 

5 Additional Doctors Act of 2014’’ or the ‘‘GRAD Act of 

6 2014’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5735 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXPEDITED REVIEW OF CERTAIN J–1 VISAS. 

2 Not later than 180 days after the date of the enact3 ment of this Act, the Secretary of State shall designate 

4 an officer or employee of the Department of State whose 

5 sole responsibility during the months of March, April, 

6 May, June, and any other period of time as determined 

7 appropriate by the Secretary, shall be to facilitate the ex8 pedited review of applications of aliens applying for admis9 sion to the United States under section 101(a)(15)(J) who 

10 are coming to the United States to participate in a pro11 gram under which they will receive graduate medical edu12 cation or training. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Mark Rapoport, Chief Operating Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company of Landacorp, Inc. (the "Company") hereby
certify that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
31, 2003, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 99.2 (the
"Periodic Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  May 13, 2003                              /s/  Mark Rapoport
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Mark Rapoport
                                                 Chief Operating Officer and
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
734 A.2d 1195

#### IN THE MATTER OF LOUIS B. BERTONI, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

August 2, 1999.

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court on the motion of LOUIS B. BERTONI for reinstatement to the practice of law, and respondent having consented to practice under the conditions recommended by the Office of Attorney Ethics;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that LOUIS B. BERTONI of CLIFTON, who

was admitted to the bar of this State in 1970, and who was temporarily suspended from the practice of law by Order of this Court dated March 25, 1999, be restored to the practice of law, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent retain an accountant approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics, and continue to provide quarterly reconciliations of his attorney accounts to the Office of Attorney Ethics for a period of two years, and until further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent practice law under the supervision of a practicing attorney approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics, *562for a period of two years and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that all checks drawn on respondent’s attorney trust account be co-signed by respondent’s supervising attorney until further Order of the Court.
Exhibit 10.46
  
  st
 Pension:
    
    Group Personal Pension Plan. The company contributions are capped at the lesser of (a) 15%
of your then-current annual base salary or (b) the maximum amount of the annual allowance
permitted by HM Revenue & Customs without additional tax (i.e.£50,000 per annum for the
2011-2012 tax year), to be contributed monthly by the Company. You are not required to
contribute in order to receive these Company contributions, but in the event that the
Companys contributions are less than the maximum amount of the annual allowance permitted by
HM Revenue & Customs without additional tax (i.e.£50,000 per annum for the 2011-2012 tax
year), you can contribute the difference between the Companys contributions and the maximum
amount of the annual allowance permitted by HM Revenue & Customs without additional tax (i.e.,
based on your current base salary of £285,000, you can contribute £7,250 for the 2011-2012 tax
year).
    Gordon Wilson
Deputy CEO Travelport & President and CEO Travelport GDS  Director, Travelport International Limited
  Signature
    
    /s/ Philip EmeryDate
    
    29-03-11
#### Hobart A. Bedell, Respondent, v. August Von Hage, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Opinion by

Hardin, P. J.
Opinion issued August 23, 2012

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-11-00172-CV

SHEARETTA COLE AND ADRIAN COLE, Appellants

V.

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR 

MORGAN STANLEY ABS CAPITAL I INC. TRUST 2006-HE3, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 979725

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants, Shearetta Cole and Adrian Cole, have failed to timely file a brief. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a) (governing time to file brief), 38.8(a) (governing failure 
2

of appellant to file brief). After being notified that this appeal was subject to 

dismissal, appellants did not respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b) (allowing 

involuntary dismissal of case).

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to timely file a brief. 

We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Bland, Massengale, and Brown.
EXHIBIT 1-S

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4901-12 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 16:12:26 Page 1

of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4901-12 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 16:12:26 Page 2

of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4901-12 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 16:12:26 Page 3

of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4901-12 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 16:12:26 Page 4

of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4901-12 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 16:12:26 Page 5

of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4901-12 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 16:12:26 Page 6

of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4901-12 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 16:12:26 Page 7

of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4901-12 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 16:12:26 Page 8

of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4901-12 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 16:12:26 Page 9

of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4901-12 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 16:12:26 Page

10 of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4901-12 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 16:12:26 Page

11 of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4901-12 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 16:12:26 Page

12 of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4901-12 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 16:12:26 Page

13 of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4901-12 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 16:12:26 Page

14 of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4901-12 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 16:12:26 Page

15 of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4901-12 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 16:12:26 Page

16 of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4901-12 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 16:12:26 Page

17 of 17
Exhibit 99.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pitts and Spitts, Inc. on Form 10-QSB
for the  period  ended  September  30,  2002 as filed  with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in the
capacities and on the dates indicated  below,  hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

                                           /s/  Paul Syracuse
                                          Paul Syracuse, Chief Executive Officer
                                          and Principal Accounting Officer


Dated: November 18, 2002
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

SUPREME COURT CAUSE NO. DA 23-0149

FIRST INTERNET BANK OF

INDIANA.

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/ Appellee,

vs.

PONTUS SK PORTFOLIO, LLC, and MICHAEL K. PRESS,

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs/ Appellants.

vs.

CHARLES D. KING

Intervenor/Appellee. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED

MOTION TO STAY

Upon motion of the Appellants throug h counsel, Appellee Charles D. King

having no objection thereto, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this appeal is stayed pending finalization

of the settlement agreement entered into during appellant mediation.

If the matter is not dismissed in 30 da ys, the appellant shall file a status

report explaining the delay.

/// 05/18/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0149ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED AND DATED BELOW.

Electronically signed by:
Beth Baker Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 18 2023