98th Congress, 2d Session Senate Document 98-32

VETO—S. 2436

MESSAGE

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OE THE UNITED STATES

RETURNING

WITHOUT MY APPROVAL S. 2436, THE PUBLIC BROADCASTING

AMENDMENTS ACT OF 1984, WHICH INCREASES SPENDING ON

PUBLIC BROADCASTING BY A MAGNITUDE WHICH CANNOT

BE JUSTIFIED

September 5, 1984.—Ordered to be printed

31-011 0

U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON: 1984
To the Senate of the United States:

Since the adjournment of the Congress has prevented my return of S. 2436 within the meaning of Article I, section 7, clause 2 of the Con­ stitution, my withholding of approval from the bill precludes its be­ coming a law. Notwithstanding what I believe to be my constitutional power regarding the use of the “pocket veto” during an adjournment of Congress, however, I am sending S. 2436 to the Senate with my ob­ jections, consistent with the Court of Appeals decision in Kennedy v. Sampson, 511 F.2d 430 (D.C. Cir. 1974). Public broadcasting constitutes an important national resource and contributes to the diversity of news, information, and entertainment choices available to the American public. Under S. 2436, however, Fed­ eral funding for public broadcasting would be increased by too much too fast. The Fiscal Year 1987 authorization of $238 million for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting represents a 49 percent increase over the already enacted funding level for 1986. Likewise, next year’s spending on new public broadcasting facilities grants would be author­ ized at $50 million or four times this year’s appropriation. When all of the demands on the Federal budget are taken into ac­ count, increases in spending on public broadcasting of the magnitude contemplated by this legislation cannot be justified. They are incom­ patible with the clear and urgent need to reduce Federal spending. Moreover, this view is clearly shared by a large portion of the House of Representatives as indicated by the 176 votes in favor of the Oxley amendment to reduce the three-year authorizations by 25 percent. In disapproving this bill, therefore, I urge the Congress to consider a revised bill providing more reasonable and moderate increases for the Board for Public Broadcasting along the lines of the Oxley amend­ ment. I also reiterate my strong opposition to the huge increases for public facilities grants contained in S. 2436 and the unjustified expan­ sion of this program to include repair and replacement of existing equipment. I must also stress that my firm insistence on scaling this bill back to more fiscally responsible levels in no way jeopardize the continued operations of public broadcasting stations across the Nation. Under the established funding mechanism, ample appropriations have already been enacted into law for all of Fiscal Years 1985 and 1986. Funding for another 25 months is already guaranteed. Thus, the issue regarding S. 2436 is really one of long-range fiscal prudence. Given the magnitude of the deficit cuts that will be needed in the years ahead, I do not believe we can justify locking-in public broadcasting funding levels for 1987-1989 that are so obviously exces­ sive. To do so would be wholly inconsistent with our pledge to slow the growth of spending and reduce the size of the deficit. Accordingly, I am disapproving S. 2436.

The White House, August 29,1984.

(l)

Ronald Reagan.