alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.8





EXHIBIT
10.8




SECOND AMENDMENT TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




THIS FIRST AMENDMENT, by and between Dolan Media Company, a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”); and Mark W.C. Stodder (“Executive”), is entered into on this 1st day of August 2009
(the “Effective Date”).



PRELIMINARY RECITALS




A. Employment Agreement. The Company and Executive have entered into a written
Employment Agreement (the “Employment Agreement”), dated as of April 1, 2007 (the “Original
Effective Date”), which remains in effect. Since then, Executive has continued to serve as
Executive Vice President/Business Information Division of the Company, pursuant to the Employment
Agreement. Any capitalized terms used in this Amendment, and not defined herein, shall have the
meanings specified in the Employment Agreement.



B. Purpose of Amendment. The Company and the Executive desire to amend certain
provisions of the Employment Agreement as described below.



AMENDMENT




NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby
agree to amend the Employment Agreement as follows:




1. Section 1.2(a) is hereby amended to read as follows:



“(a) Service with the Company. During the Employment Period, Executive shall
(i) serve as the Company’s Executive Vice President/Business Information Division and
shall report directly to the Chief Operating Officer and, indirectly to the Chief
Executive Officer and the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”), (ii) have
such responsibilities, duties and authorities, and render such services for the
Company, that Executive has or renders for the Company as of the Effective Date, and
(iii) have such other responsibilities, duties and authorities, and render such other
services for the Company, that are consistent with Executive’s position as Executive
Vice President/Business Information Division, as the Chief Operating Offer, Chief
Executive Officer or the Board may from time to time reasonably direct.



2. Except as expressly amended in this Second Amendment, the Employment Agreement, as amended,
shall remain in full force and effect according to its terms.


 


1









 





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Executive and the Company have executed this Amendment on
the Effective Date:



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	COMPANY:



DOLAN MEDIA COMPANY

 	 
	 	/s/James P. Dolan
 	 
	 	By: James P. Dolan, Chairman, President and Chief  Executive Officer 	 
	 
	 	/s/ John Bergstrom 	 
	 	By: John Bergstrom, Chairman of the Compensation Committee 	 
	 
	 	EXECUTIVE:

 

/s/ Mark W.C. Stodder	 
	 	Mark W.C. Stodder	 




 


2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 4 (Friday, January 6, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 2153]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-302]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA)


Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of the 
meeting of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services 
Administration (SAMHSA) National Advisory Council in January 1995.
    This meeting will include an open discussion of issues related to 
SAMHSA's reauthorization, budget, and SAMHSA's managed care activities. 
In addition, there will be a status report by the Council's workgroups 
on Health Care Reform, Co-Occurring Mental Illness and Substance Use 
Disorders, Program Evaluation, and a discussion of other SAMHSA program 
and policy issues. Attendance by the public will be limited to space 
available.
    A summary of the meeting and a roster of council members may be 
obtained from: Ms. Susan E. Day, Program Assistant, SAMHSA National 
Advisory Council, 5600 Fishers Lane, Room 12C-15, Rockville, Maryland 
20857; Telephone: (301) 443-4640.
    Substantive program information may be obtained from the contact 
whose name and telephone number is listed below.

    Committee Name: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services 
Administration National Advisory Council.
    Meeting Date: January 30, 1995.
    Place: Holiday Inn--Bethesda, Versailles IV, 8120 Wisconsin 
Avenue, Bethesda, Maryland 20814.
    Open: January 30, 1995, 9:00 a.m. to adjournment.
    Contact: Toian Vaughn, Room 12C-15, Parklawn Building; Telephone 
(301) 443-4640. FAX (301) 443-1450.

    Dated: December 30, 1994.
Jeri Lipov,
Committee Management Officer, SAMHSA.
[FR Doc. 95-302 Filed 1-5-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          34,142
<SECURITIES>                                    11,725
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,258
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (508)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,333
<PP&E>                                           5,914
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,872)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  60,083
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,132
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            25
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,573
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    60,083
<SALES>                                          4,968
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,457
<CGS>                                               89
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,286
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,079
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 356
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (552)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        46
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (548)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (598)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)


</TABLE>
Circuit Court for Baltimore City

Case No. 24-C-11-000954

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND 

No. 70

 September Term, 2015

 

MICHAEL DAVON CHRISTIAN 

v.

STEWART LEVITAS 

 

Barbera, C.J. 

Battaglia 

 Greene 

Adkins 

McDonald 

Watts, 

JJ. 

 PER CURIAM ORDER 

 

Filed: November 23, 2015 
MICHAEL DAVON CHRISTIAN * IN THE 

 * COURT OF APPEALS 

v. * OF MARYLAND 

* No. 70

STEWART LEVITAS * September Term, 2015

 PER CURIAM ORDER 

 

The Court having considered and granted the petition for a

writ of certiorari in the above entitled case, it is this 23rd day 

of November, 2015, 

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the 

judgment of the Court of Special Appeals be, and it is hereby, 

vacated and the case is remanded to that Court for further 

reconsideration in light of Jakeem Roy v. Sandra B. Dackman et 

al., ____ Md.____, ____ A.3d ____(No. 6, September Term, 2015, 

filed October 16, 2015). Costs in this Court to be paid by the 

Respondent, and costs in the Court of Special Appeals to abide the 

result. 

_/s/ Mary Ellen Barbera_

 Chief Judge
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 103 (Friday, May 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 29995]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13082]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE:  11 a.m., Friday June 25, 2010.

PLACE:  1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS:  Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-
5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-13082 Filed 5-26-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7196
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus AARON BROCKINGTON, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CR-90-100, CA-96-5-3) Submitted: January 30, 1998 Decided: February 18, 1998 Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Aaron Brockington, Appellant Pro Se. Wade A. Kizer, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Howard Crawford Vick, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Although the district court had jurisdiction to consider Appellant's motion, see Standard Oil Co. v. United States , 429 U.S. 17, 18 (1976), we agree that the motion was untimely under Rule 60(b)(1) and did not present a claim cognizable under Rule 60(b)(6). Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Brockington , Nos. CR-90-100; CA-96-5-3 (E.D. Va. June 13, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP16-299-000]

                    On January 21, 2016, the Commission issued an order in Docket No. RP16-299-000, pursuant to section 5 of the Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S.C. 717d (2012), instituting an investigation into the justness and reasonableness of Tuscarora Gas Transmission Company (Tuscarora) currently effective tariff rates. The Commission's order directs Tuscarora to file a full cost and revenue study within 75 days of the issuance of the order.                     *Tuscarora Gas Transmission Company,*                     154 FERC ¶61,030 (2016).                

Dated: January 21, 2016.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2016-01795 Filed 2-1-16; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Filed 2/15/01 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2001 ND 26

Vince Carry Mocassin, Jr., 

and Angela Halsey, Plaintiffs and Appellants

v.

State Farm Mutual Automobile 

Insurance Company, Defendant and Appellee

No. 20000065

Appeal from the District Court of Sioux County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Benny A. Graff, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Chad R. McCabe, Vinje Law Firm, 523 North 4th Street, Bismarck, N.D. 58501-4055, for plaintiffs and appellants.

Jason R. Vendsel, McGee, Hankla, Backes & Dobrovolny, P.O. Box 998, Minot N.D. 58702-0998, for defendant and appellee.

Carry Mocassin v. State Farm

No. 20000065

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Vince Carry Mocassin, Jr., and Angela Halsey appeal from a summary judgment dismissing their claims against State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company for deceit, negligent misrepresentation, bad faith, and infliction of emotional distress.  We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7), Dvorak v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co., 508 N.W.2d 329 (N.D. 1993) (an insurer’s duty of good faith and fair dealing extends to its insured, but not third-party claimants, and there is no claim for relief under N.D.C.C. § 26.1-04-03(9) absent a showing the insurer has committed violations with a frequency indicating a general business practice), and Volk v. Wisconsin Mortgage Assurance Co., 474 N.W.2d 40 (N.D. 1991) (same).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Dale V. Sandstrom

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Mary Muehlen Maring

William A. Neumann
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 237 (Monday, December 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 63511]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30050]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Technical Information Service


Advisory Board Meeting

AGENCY: National Technical Information Service, Technology 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of partially closed meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. 
2, notice is hereby given that the National Technical Information 
Service Advisory Board (the ``Board'') will meet on Monday, January 8, 
1996, from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., and on Tuesday, January 9, 1996, 
from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. The session on Tuesday, January 9, 1996, 
will be closed to the Public.
    The Board was established under the authority of 15 U.S.C. 
3704b(c), and was Chartered on September 15, 1989. The Board is 
composed of five members appointed by the Secretary of Commerce who are 
eminent in such fields as information resources management, information 
technology, and library and information services. The purpose of the 
meeting is to review and make recommendations regarding general 
policies and operations of NTIS, including policies in connection with 
fees and charges for its services. The agenda will include a progress 
report on NTIS activities, an update on the progress of FedWorld, and a 
discussion of NTIS' long range plans. The closed session discussion is 
scheduled to begin at 9:00 a.m. and end at 4:00 p.m. on January 9, 
1996. The session will be closed because premature disclosure of the 
information to be discussed would be likely to significantly frustrate 
implementation of NTIS' business plans.

DATES: The meeting will convene on January 8, 1996, at 9:00 a.m. and 
adjourn at 4:00 p.m. and convene again on January 9, 1996, at 9:00 a.m. 
and adjourn at 4:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in Room 2029 Sills Building, 
National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, 
Springfield, Virginia 22161.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: The meeting will be open to public participation 
on January 8, 1996, and closed on January 9, 1996. Approximately thirty 
minutes will be set aside on January 8, 1996 for comments or questions 
from the public. Seats will be available for the public and for the 
media on a first-come, first-served basis. Any member of the public may 
submit written comments concerning the Board's affairs at any time. 
Copies of the minutes of the open session meeting will be available 
within thirty days of the meeting from the address given below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linda Lucas, NTIS Advisory Board 
Secretary, National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal 
Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161 Telephone: (703) 487-4636; Fax (703) 
487-4093.

    Dated: December 5, 1995.
Donald R. Johnson,
Director.
[FR Doc. 95-30050 Filed 12-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-04-M
EX-34.10
(logo) KPMG

KPMG LLP
1601 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103-2499


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Members
Regulus Group LLC:


We have examined management's assessment for those customers that management has
informed us have requested confirmation of compliance, included in the
accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing
Criteria, that Regulus Group LLC complied with the servicing criteria set forth
in Item 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) of the Securities and Exchange
Commission's Regulation AB for remittance processing services to those issuers
of asset backed securities and servicers of loan and/or receivables portfolios
that include pool assets for asset backed securities transactions (the Platform)
as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007. Regulus Group LLC has determined
that the remainder of the servicing criteria are not applicable to the
activities it performs with respect to the Platform as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2007. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with
those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
management's assessment about the Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing
selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform,
testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining
whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those
selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our
procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities
performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our
procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred
either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances
or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by
this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe
that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assessment that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007
is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ KPMG LLP

February 12, 2008


KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, is the U.S.
member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.
exv10w32






Exhibit 10.32




AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO

ROCKWELL MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

2007 LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN



This Amendment No. 2 to the Rockwell Medical Technologies, Inc. 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan
(the “Plan”) is made this 1st day of April, 2009 pursuant to Section 10.6 of the
Plan following approval by the Board of Directors and shareholders of Rockwell Medical
Technologies, Inc.



1. Section 1.7(a) is amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:





(a) The Corporation has reserved 2,500,000 shares of the Corporation’s
Common Stock for issuance pursuant to stock-based Awards, including
without limitation, Incentive Stock Options. All amounts in this Section
1.7 shall be adjusted, as applicable, in accordance with Article IX.


2. Section 8.2 is amended by amending and restating the last sentence thereof to read as
follows:





The Committee shall not waive any restrictions on a Code Section 162(m)
Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Unit Award, but the Committee may
provide in a Participant’s Code Section 162(m) Restricted Stock or
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement or otherwise that upon the Employee’s
termination of employment due to (a) death or (b) Disability prior to
the termination of the Restriction Period, that the performance goals
and restrictions shall be deemed to have been satisfied on terms
determined by the Committee.


3. Section 8.3 is amended by amending and restating the last sentence thereof to read as
follows:





Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee shall not waive any
restrictions on a Code Section 162(m) Performance Award, but the
Committee may provide in a Participant’s Code Section 162(m) Performance
Share Agreement or otherwise that upon the Participant’s termination of
employment or services due to (a) death or (b) Disability prior to the
attainment of the associated performance goals and restrictions, that
the performance goals and restrictions shall be deemed to have been
satisfied on terms determined by the Committee.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Rockwell Medical Technologies, Inc. has caused this Amendment No. 2 to be
executed as of the day and year first above written.




	 	 	 	 	 
	ROCKWELL MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

 	 	 
	/s/ Robert L. Chioini
 	 	 	 
	President and Chief Executive Officer 	 	 
	 	 	 



16
Summary of Guaranty Contract
of Maximum Amount ( the “Contract”) Entered into by and between Xiangqian Li(the
“Guarantor”) and Shenzhen Caitian Branch, Bank of Communications (the
“Creditor”) on April 26, 2009

    


    Main
contents:

    Ø   
Guaranty Contract number: 4431702009B100000001;

    Ø   
Xiangqian Li undertakes to assume joint and several liabilities for
Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd (the “Obligor”)’s indebtedness towards Bank of
Communications under the Comprehensive Credit Facility Agreement of Maximum
Amount (reference no.: 4431702009C000000000) from March 25, 2009
to March 25, 2010, and the maximum amount secured is RMB 200
million.

    Ø    Guaranty Responsibility: The guaranty
under this Contract shall be guaranty with joint and several liabilities. The
guarantor is obligated to pay off the debt in the event the obligor is unable to
pay off the debt (including the creditor declares the debt becomes mature in
advance to its original expiry date due to default of the obligor or the
guarantor).

    Ø    Scope of Guaranty: The guaranty shall cover
all of the loan principal, interest, penalty interest, breach of contract
compensation, damages, undertaking fee and all the expenses such as litigation
cost, lawyer’s fee, notification cost and public notice cost etc. which is
incurred to the Creditor in realizing its creditor’s right.

    Ø    Guaranty period: The
guaranty period is from the effective date of this Contract to two years after
the expiry of the term of the Credit Facility Agreement and relevant agreement
entered into under the Credit Facility Agreement.

    


    Headlines
of the articles omitted:

    Ø   
Termination and explanation

    Ø   
Payment on demand

    Ø   
Declaration and guaranty of the Guarantor

    Ø   
Obligations of the Guarantor

    Ø   
Agreement of Bank Sequestrate Deposits

    Ø   
Disputation settlement

    Ø   
Supplement articles