alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 237 (Monday, December 11, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Pages 63574-63575]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30269]








NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION

Notice of Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, December 14, 1995.

PLACE: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314-3428.

STATUS: Open.

BOARD BRIEFING:


    1. Insurance Fund Report.


MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:


    1. Approval of Minutes of Previous Open Meeting.
    2. Community Development Revolving Loan Program for Credit 
Unions: Notice of Applications for Participation.
    3. Central Liquidity Facility Agent Reimbursement for 1996.

RECESS: 10:45 a.m.

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Thursday, December 14, 1995.

PLACE: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314-3428.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:


    1. Approval of Minutes of Previous Closed Meeting.
    2. Administrative Action under Section 205 of the FCU Act and 
Part 708 of NCUA's Rules and Regulations. Closed pursuant to 
exemption (8).
    3. Administrative Action under Section 109 of the Federal Credit 
Union Act. Closed pursuant to exemption (8).
    4. Administrative Actions under Part 745 of NCUA's Rules and 
Regulations. Closed pursuant to exemptions (6) and (8).
    5. Administrative Action under Part 704 of NCUA's Rules and 
Regulations. Closed pursuant to exemption (8).
    6. Personnel Action(s). Closed pursuant to exemptions (2) and 
(6).



[[Page 63575]]

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Becky Baker, Secretary of the Board, 
Telephone (703) 518-6304.
Becky Baker,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 95-30269 Filed 12-7-95; 2:44 pm]

BILLING CODE 7535-01-M
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5165 Filed: 12/18/19 Entered: 12/18/19 13:48:41 Page 1 of

1
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5637 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an exclusion from 

gross income for discharge of consumer indebtedness. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 

Mr. PETERS of California (for himself and Mr. VARGAS) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

an exclusion from gross income for discharge of consumer indebtedness. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Consumer Debt For5 giveness Tax Relief Act of 2014’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME FOR DISCHARGE 

7 OF CONSUMER INDEBTEDNESS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 108(a) 

9 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by strik10 ing ‘‘or’’ at the end of subparagraph (D), by striking the 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5637 IH

1 period at the end of subparagraph (E) and inserting ‘‘, 

2 or’’, and by adding at the end the following: 

3 ‘‘(F) the indebtedness discharged is quali4 fied consumer indebtedness.’’. 

5 (b) SPECIAL RULES RELATING TO QUALIFIED CON6 SUMER INDEBTEDNESS.—Section 108 of the Internal 

7 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

8 the following: 

9 ‘‘(j) SPECIAL RULES RELATING TO QUALIFIED CON10 SUMER INDEBTEDNESS.— 

11 ‘‘(1) QUALIFIED CONSUMER INDEBTEDNESS

12 DEFINED.—For purposes of this section, the term 

13 ‘qualified consumer indebtedness’ means any indebt14 edness of a natural person arising out of a trans15 action in which the money, property, or services 

16 which are the subject of the transaction are pri17 marily for personal, family, or household purposes. 

18 ‘‘(2) OVERALL LIMITATION.—The aggregate 

19 amount of discharged indebtedness treated as quali20 fied consumer indebtedness for the taxable year shall 

21 not exceed the excess (if any) of— 

22 ‘‘(A) $2,500, over 

23 ‘‘(B) the aggregate amounts treated as 

24 qualified consumer indebtedness with respect to 

25 such taxpayer for all prior taxable years.’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5637 IH

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to indebtedness discharged after 

3 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Gary Corsi, certify that: 

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (U.S.);

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date:  November 10, 2004
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Cherish Adams, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of PSPP Holdings, Inc.



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.



4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in exchange act rules 13a-15(e) and 15d- 15(f)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;



c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: May 14, 2007



/s/ Cherish Adams

Cherish Adams,

Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent thereof)
EXHIBIT 1-R

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4901-10 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 16:12:26 Page 1

of 5


Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4901-10 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 16:12:26 Page 2

of 5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4901-10 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 16:12:26 Page 3

of 5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4901-10 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 16:12:26 Page 4

of 5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4901-10 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 16:12:26 Page 5

of 5
Order entered January 5, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 20
- 00449
- CV FRANCIE RACHAL, Appellant

V. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE, IN TRUST FOR THE REGISTERED HOLDERS OF MORGAN STANLEY ABS CAPITAL I INC. TRUST 2006
- HE8 MORTGAGE PASS
- THROUGH

CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006
- HE8 , Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 002
- 00452
- 2020

ORDER Bef ore the Court is appellant’s December 30, 2020 motion to extend time to file her brief

. Appellant seeks a ninety

- day extension. We note the brief was first due Ju ne 2 9 , 2020. We further note t hree extensions totaling 18 5 days have previously been granted , and o ur order granting the last extension cau t i oned appellant that failure to file the brief by January 11, 2021 could result in dismissal of the appeal.The appeal cannot move forward without appellant’s brief. Given the delay

that has already occurred , we DENY the motion. On the Court’s own motion, we ORDER the brief be filed no later than January 22, 2021

. We caution appellant that further extension motions will not be entertained and f ailure to file the brief will result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b),(c).

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
----

|  | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 20-F of Cellcom Israel Ltd; and |
|--|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|--|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Shlomi Fruhling                    |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Shlomi FruhlingChief Financial Officer |   |

----
#### KATE HARRISON EBERT v. C. C. DISHER.

(Filed 29 November, 1939.)

Appeal and Error § 50—

In this case the judgment appealed from having been modified and affirmed, it is ordered that the costs be equally divided between plaintiff and defendant. O. S., 1256.

PetitioN by plaintiff Kate Harrison Ebert to rehear this case, reported *ante,*36.

*Ingle, Bucher & Ingle for petitioner.*

*Hastings ■& Booe and Peyton B. Abbott, contra.*

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Superior Court from which petitioner appealed was by this Court modified and affirmed. Petitioner asks, among other things, that the costs be not taxed against her. In this respect the petition is allowed, and the costs will be equally divided between plaintiff and defendant. C. S., 1256; *Hawkins v. Cedar Works,*122 N. C., 87, 30 S. E., 13.

Petition allowed in part.
#### HARDY et al. v. BURROUGHS et al., BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, and MOSELEY et al., BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF WARREN COUNTY.

(Filed 1 November, 1935.)

Appeal by plaintiffs from *Devin, J.,*at June Term, 1935,.of WarreN.

*J. PL. Bridgers for appellants.*

*George C. Green, Perry & Kittrell, Julius Banzet, Stuart Smith, and Frank Banzet for appellees.*

Sohenok, J.

This case is practically tbe same as *Newman et al. v. Watkins et al., Board of County Commissioners, and Royster et al., Board of Elections of Vance County, ante,*675, and is affirmed for tbe reasons therein stated.

Affirmed.

ClaeKSON, J.,

dissenting: For tbe reasons given in my dissenting opinion in tbe action of *Newman et al. v. Watkins et al., ante,*675, I tbink tbe judgment of tbe court below should be reversed.
**Exhibit      32.2 **

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 **

**OF      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or                15(d) of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| March                27, 2008                                      |   |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| */s/                  Russell B. Adler*                                 |   |   |        |
| Mr.                Russell Adler Chief                Financial Officer |

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

TIMOTHY S. LAFFREDI (WI SBN 1055133)

Assistant United States Trustee

LYNETTE C. KELLY (SBN 120799)

Trial Attorney 

MARTA E. VILLACORTA (NY SBN 4918280)

Trial Attorney

United States Department of Justice

Office of the U.S. Trustee 

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 05-0153

San Francisco, CA 94102

Telephone: (415) 705-3333

Facsimile: (415) 705-3379

Email: lynette.c.kelly@usdoj.gov;

marta.villacorta@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for James L. Snyder,

Acting United States Trustee for Region 121

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re

PG&E CORPORATION,

 Debtor-in-Possession.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 19-30088 DM

Chapter 11

In re

PACIFICE GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY,

 Debtor-in-Possession.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 19-30089 DM 

Chapter 11

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND REQUEST FOR NOTICE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned attorney hereby appears under Fed. R. 

Bankr. P. 9010 for James L. Snyder, the Acting United States Trustee for Region 12, and 

requests that all required notices be directed to:

 

1 James L. Snyder, Acting United States Trustee for Region 12, is acting in this appointment for Tracy Hope 

Davis, United States Trustee for Region 17, who has recused herself.

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 47 Filed: 01/29/19 Entered: 01/29/19 11:29:13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Office of the United States Trustee

Attn: Lynette C. Kelly

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 05-0153

San Francisco, CA 94102

Email: lynette.c.kelly@usdoj.gov

Dated: January 29, 2019 JAMES L. SNYDER

ACTING UNITED STATES TRUSTEE FOR 

REGION 12

/s/ Lynette C. Kelly 

Trial Attorney

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 47 Filed: 01/29/19 Entered: 01/29/19 11:29:13 Page 2 of 2
#### Jane Hussey, Respondent, v. The New York Recorder Company, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed,with costs,with leave to defendant to answer in twenty days on payment of costs.

Pratt, J.:

I entertain no doubt of the propriety of the action of the learned trial judge in overruling this demurrer. The case of *Moore*v. *Francis*(121 N. Y. 199), so much relied on by appellant, is an authority against it. We think the complaint states a plain cause of action for libel. We fail to find in the opinion in that case the words,apparently quoted in defendant’s points. Judgment affirmed, with costs, with leave to defendant to answer within twenty days on payment of costs.

Brown, P. J., and Dykman, J., concurred.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Unizan Financial Corp.s (the
Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James H. Nicholson, Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |                                                                                  
|----------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 7, 2004 |  | /s/ James H. Nicholson                                                           
|                  |  | James H. Nicholson                                                               
|                  |  | Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Principal Financial Officer
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ERIKA GINSBERG-KLEMMT and )

ACHIM GINSBERG-KLEMMT, )

)

Appellants, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-4889

)

SARASOTA COUNTY, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed November 8, 2019. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Sarasota County; Frederick P. 

Mercurio, Judge.

Eric S. Koenig and Marie Tomassi of 

Trenam, Kemker, Scharf, Barkin, Frye, 

O’Neill & Mullis, P.A., Tampa, for 

Appellants.

Stephen E. DeMarsh, County Attorney, 

and David M. Pearce, Assistant County 

Attorney, Sarasota, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

BLACK, ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
1 The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Beverly Stites Jones, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 04-2446

___________ Charles Bausley, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Roy Bass, Deputy, Crawford County * Western District of Arkansas. Detention Center; Kevin Dagan, * Deputy, Crawford County Detention * [UNPUBLISHED] Center, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: October 1, 2004 Filed: October 13, 2004

___________ Before MURPHY, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Charles Bausley appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action claiming defendant jail personnel violated his constitutional rights in various-2- ways. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude dismissal was proper for the reasons the district court stated. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________