Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 237 / Monday, December 11, 1995 / Notices 63545

1A stay will be issued routinely by the

Commission in those proceedings where an

informed decision on environmental issues

(whether raised by a party or by the Commission’s

Section of Environmental Analysis in its

independent investigation) cannot be made prior to

the effective date of the notice of exemption. See

Exemption of Out-of-Service Rail Lines, 5 I.C.C.2d

377 (1989). Any entity seeking a stay involving

environmental concerns is encouraged to file its

request as soon as possible in order to permit the

Commission to review and act on the request prior

to the effective date of this exemption.

2See Exempt. of Rail Abandonment—Offers of

Finan. Assist., 4 I.C.C.2d 164 (1987).

3The Commission will accept a late-filed trail use

request as long as it retains jurisdiction to do so.

4Legislation that will terminate the Commission

on December 31, 1995, is now pending enactment.

Parties submitting pleadings should continue to use

the Commission’s current name and address until

further notice.

Commission or with any U.S. District

Court or has been decided in favor of a

complainant within the 2-year period;

and (4) the requirements at 49 CFR

1105.12 (newspaper publication), 49

CFR 1105.7 (environmental reports),

and 49 CFR 1152.50(d)(1) (notice to

governmental agencies) have been met.

As a condition to use of this

exemption, any employee adversely

affected by the abandonment shall be

protected under Oregon Short Line R.

Co.—Abandonment—Goshen, 360 I.C.C.

91 (1979). To address whether this

condition adequately protects affected

employees, a petition for partial

revocation under 49 U.S.C. 10505(d)

must be filed.

Provided no formal expression of

intent to file an offer of financial

assistance (OFA) has been received, this

exemption will be effective on January

10, 1996, unless stayed pending

reconsideration. Petitions to stay that do

not involve environmental issues,1

formal expressions of intent to file an

OFA under 49 CFR 1152.27(c)(2),2 and

trail use/rail banking requests under 49

CFR 1152.29 3 must be filed by

December 21, 1995. Petitions to reopen

or requests for public use conditions

under 49 CFR 1152.28 must be filed by

January 2, 1996, with: Office of the

Secretary, Case Control Branch,

Interstate Commerce Commission,4 1201

Constitution Avenue, N.W.,

Washington, DC 20423.

A copy of any pleading filed with the

Commission should be sent to

applicant’s representative: Jo A.

DeRoche, 1350 New York Ave., N.W.,

Suite 800, Washington, DC 20005–4797.

If the notice of exemption contains

false or misleading information, the

exemption is void ab initio.

SF&L has filed an environmental

report which addresses the effects of the

abandonment, if any, on the

environment and historic resources. The

Commission’s Section of Environmental

Analysis (SEA) will issue an

environmental assessment (EA) by

December 15, 1995. Interested persons

may obtain a copy of the EA by writing

to SEA (Room 3219, Interstate

Commerce Commission, 1201

Constitution Avenue, N.W.,

Washington, DC 20423) or by calling

Elaine Kaiser, Chief of SEA, at (202)

927–6248. Comments on environmental

and historic preservation matters must

be filed within 15 days after the EA is

available to the public.

Environmental, historic preservation,

public use, or trail use/rail banking

conditions will be imposed, where

appropriate, in a subsequent decision.

Decided: December 4, 1995.

By the Commission, Joseph H. Dettmar,

Acting Director, Office of Proceedings.

Vernon A. Williams,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–30059 Filed 12–8–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7035–01–P

[Finance Docket No. 32256]

Consolidated Rail Corporation—

Control and Operation Exemption—

Clearfield and Mahoning Railway

Company

AGENCY: Interstate Commerce

Commission.

ACTION: Notice of exemption.

SUMMARY: The Commission exempts

from the prior approval requirements of

49 U.S.C. 11343–45 the control and

operation by Consolidated Rail

Corporation of Clearfield and Mahoning

Railway Company, subject to standard

labor protective conditions.

DATES: This exemption will be effective

on January 7, 1996. Petitions to stay

must be filed by December 18, 1995, and

petitions to reopen must be filed by

December 28, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Send pleadings referring to

Finance Docket No. 32256 to: (1) Office

of the Secretary, Case Control Branch,

Interstate Commerce Commission 1201

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,

DC 20423; and (2) Petitioner’s

representative, John J. Paylor, 2001

Market St.–16A, P.O. Box 41416,

Philadelphia, PA 19101.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Beryl Gordon, (202) 927–5610. [TDD for

the hearing impaired: (202) 927–5721.]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Additional information is contained in

the Commission’s decision. To purchase

a copy of the full decision, write to, call,

or pick up in person from DC NEWS &

DATA, INC., Interstate Commerce

Commission Building, 1201

Constitution Avenue, NW., Room 2229,

Washington, DC 20423. Telephone:

(202) 289–4357/4359. [Assistance for

the hearing impaired is available

through TDD services (202) 927–5721.]

Dated: November 22, 1995.

By the Commission, Chairman Morgan,

Vice Chairman Owen, and Commissioner

Simmons.

Vernon A. Williams,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–30079 Filed 12–8–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7035–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree

Pursuant to the Clean Air Act

In accordance with Departmental

policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby

given that a proposed Consent Decree in

United States v. General Motors

Corporation, Civil Action No. 1:95–CV–

02215, was lodged on November 30,

1995, with the United States District

Court for the District of Columbia. The

proposed Consent Decree resolves

claims against General Motors

Corporation for injunctive relief and

civil penalties under the Clean Air Act,

42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. (the ‘‘Act’’),

arising from the sale of approximately

470,000 model year 1991–1995 Cadillac

vehicles, certain model year 1991–1995

light duty vehicles, and certain model

year 1989–1996 heavy-duty gasoline

engines (collectively, the ‘‘covered

vehicles and engines’’) in violation of

the Act and the regulations promulgated

thereunder relating to the emission of

pollutants from mobile sources.

The proposed Consent Decree

requires that General Motors

Corporation: Implement a remedial

recall campaign to reduce emissions

associated with the climate-control

system fuel-enrichment strategy

employed on the Cadillacs that are the

subject of the government’s claims;

establish a fund of up to $8.75 million

to implement one or more emission

remedial projects and an emission test

program to remedy the past and future

emission of air pollutants from the

covered vehicles and engines; conduct

tests of future model years of the

covered vehicles and engines to assess

the affects of accessory- and timer-based

enrichment strategies; and pay a civil

penalty of $11 million to resolve the

United States’ civil claims with respect

to the vehicles and engines covered by

the Consent Decree.

The Department of Justice will

receive, for a period of thirty (30) days

from the date of this publication,
63546 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 237 / Monday, December 11, 1995 / Notices

comments relating to the proposed

Consent Decree. Comments should be

addressed to the Assistant Attorney

General for the Environment and

Natural Resources Division, Department

of Justice, Washington, DC 20530, and

should refer to United States v. General

Motors Corporation, DOJ Ref. #90–5–2–

1–2011 and 2011A.

The proposed Consent Decree may be

examined at the Office of the United

States Attorney, Judiciary Center Bldg.,

555 Fourth St. NW., Washington, DC

20001; at the Environmental Protection

Agency Library, Reference Desk, Room

2904, 401 M Street SW., Washington,

DC 20460; and at the Consent Decree

Library, 1120 G Street NW., 4th Floor,

Washington, DC 20005, 202–624–0892.

A copy of the proposed Consent Decree

may be obtained in person or by mail

from the Consent Decree Library, 1120

G Street NW., 4th Floor, Washington,

DC 20005. In requesting a copy, please

refer to the referenced case and enclose

a check in the amount of $18.75 (25

cents per page reproduction costs),

payable to the Consent Decree Library.

Joel M. Gross,

Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section.

[FR Doc. 95–30055 Filed 12–8–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–01–M

OFFICE OF NATIONAL DRUG

CONTROL POLICY

National Consultation on Drug Control

AGENCY: Office of National Drug Control

Policy.

ACTION: The Office of National Drug

Control Policy (ONDCP) is requesting an

emergency review under the Paperwork

Reduction Act. This is because ONDCP

is required by law to deliver the 1996

National Drug Control Strategy and

Budget document to the Congress in

February, 1996, and the subject

consultation is critical to the

development of that Strategy.

SUMMARY: The Office of National Drug

Control Policy, Executive Office of the

President, in carrying out its

responsibilities under the Paperwork

Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, 5

CFR 1320 {53 FR 16618, May 10,

1988}), is submitting a request to

conduct a National Consultation on

Drug Control, entitled ‘‘Consult With

America.’’ The ONDCP consultation

survey instrument will be used to assess

public opinion regarding perceptions of

the use and impact of illicit drugs; the

effectiveness of prevention, intervention

and treatment programs; and level of

public support for specific drug control

actions. A telephone survey of a random

sample of adults 18 years of age and

older will be conducted.

DATES: ONDCP has requested an

emergency review of this submission

under the Paperwork Reduction Act;

this Office of Management and Budget

(OMB) review has been requested to be

completed by December 8, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Comments and questions regarding the

National Survey on Drug Control should

be directed to Mr. N. Ross Deck, Senior

Policy Analyst, Office of National Drug

Control Policy, Executive Office of the

President, 750 17th Street NW.,

Washington, DC 20500, (202) 395–6736.

Any member of the public who wants to

comment on the information collection

request which has been submitted to

OMB should advise Mr. Deck of this

intent at the earliest possible date.

Average Burden Hours/Minutes per

Response: 12 Minutes.

Frequency of Response: One time data

collection.

Number of Respondents: 2,000.

Total Annual Burden Hours: 400.

Total Annual Response: 2,000.

Affected Public: Non-institutional

adult (18 years of age or older)

population residing in the U.S. at the

household level.

Respondents Obligation to Replay:

The survey is voluntary.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 1st day of

December, 1995.

N. Ross Deck,

Senior Policy Analyst.

[FR Doc. 95–30030 Filed 12–8–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3180–02–P

NUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50–440]

Cleveland Electric Illuminating

Company, Centerior Service Company,

Duquesne Light Company, Ohio

Edison Company, Pennsylvania Power

Company, Toledo Edison Company

(Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1);

Exemption

I

Cleveland Electric Illuminating

Company, (the licensee) is the holder of

Facility Operating License No. NPF–58,

which authorizes operation of the Perry

Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 (PNPP).

The operating license provides, among

other things, that the licensee is subject

to all rules, regulations, and orders of

the Commission now and hereafter in

effect.

The facility consists of a single boiling

water reactor located at the licensee’s

site in Lake County, Ohio.

II

Containment leak rate testing is

necessary to demonstrate that the

measured leak rate is within the

acceptance criteria cited in the licensing

design basis. Periodic testing of the

overall containment structure along

with separate leak testing of the

penetrations provides assurance that

post-accident radiological consequences

will be within the limits of 10 CFR Part

100. The Commission’s requirements

regarding leak rate testing are found in

Appendix J to 10 CFR Part 50.

In its letter dated October 21, 1994,

the licensee applied for partial

exemptions from the Commission’s

regulations. The subject exemptions,

which are from the requirements in

Appendix J, Option A, to 10 CFR Part

50, include:

• Section III.A.5(b)(2) states that the

measured leakage from the containment

integrated leak rate (Type A) test (Lam)

shall be less than 75% of the maximum

allowable leakage rate (0.75 La).

• Sections III.B.3 and III.C.3 require

that the combined leakage of valves and

penetrations subject to Type B and C

local leak rate testing be less than 0.6

times the maximum allowable leakage

rate (0.6 La).

• Section III.A.1(d) requires that all

fluid systems that would be open to

containment following post-accident

conditions, be vented and drained prior

to conducting the containment

integrated leak rate test.

• Section III.D.1(a) states that the

third Type A test of each 10-year

interval be conducted when the plant is

shut down for the 10-year plant

inservice inspection.

• Section III.D.3 states that Type C

tests shall be performed during each

reactor shutdown for refueling but in no

case at intervals greater than 2 years.

Type C tests are tests intended to

measure containment isolation valve

leakage rates.

III

Section III.A.5(b)(2) states that the

measured leakage from the containment

integrated leak rate (Type A) test (Lam)

shall be less than 75% of the maximum

allowable leakage rate (0.75 La). The

licensee proposes to exempt main steam

line isolation valve leakage from Type A

test results and consider leakage from

the main steam lines separately.

Sections III.B.3 and III.C.3 require that

the combined leakage of valves and

penetrations subject to Type B and C

local leak rate testing be less than 0.6