alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

April 1, 2013

p0325

Order 

April 1, 2013

146281

DEZAAK MANAGEMENT, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

and

THOMAS VANDUINEN,

Plaintiff, 

v SC: 146281

COA: 307025 

Alpena CC: 10-003311-CK

AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 23, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________
No. 97-10604 Summary Calendar

_______________________

DANIEL OCHOA-FLORES,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

JOHN M. TOMBONE,

Respondent-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

(3:97-CV-551-T)

_________________________________________________________________ May 13, 1998

Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Daniel Ochoa-Flores, a federal prisoner (#27286-077),

appeals the summary dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for

writ of habeas corpus. In the petition, he contended that he was

entitled to early release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3621(e)(2)(B)

because he had compl eted a Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) drug-abuse

treatment program.2 For the first time on appeal, Ochoa-Flores contends that

the BOP violated his ex post facto rights because it retroactively

applied a r egulation, 28 C.F.R. § 550.58, which excluded INS

detainees from early-release consideration. He also argues for the

first time on appeal that the BOP violated his due process rights

by frustrating his “settled expectations” regarding early release.

This court declines to review those claims. See United States v.

Rocha
, 109 F.3d 225, 229 (5th Cir. 1997) (declining to address

claims raised for the first time on appeal in 28 U.S.C. § 2255

action). Even if we reviewed them for plain error, we would

decline to grant relief because no manifest miscarriages of justice

has been shown. United States v. Olano , 507 U.S. 725 (1993).

Ochoa-Flores also contends that the government should be

equitably estopped from excluding him from early release, because

he relied on his detriment on BOP promises in attending the drugabuse treatment sessions . he has shown neither that government

officials engaged in affirmative misconduct in withholding earlyrelease eligibility from him nor that he was substantially injured

as a result of attending the treatment program. S ee Taylor v. U.S.

Treasury Dep’t , 127 F.3d 470, 474 (5th Cir. 1997). The claim is

meritless.

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 238 (Tuesday, December 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63736-63737]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30155]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[NAFTA-00634]


Lockheed Martin, Ocean, Radar & Sensor Systems, Utica, New York; 
Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 USC 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on October 26, 1995, applicable 
to all workers of Lockheed Martin, Ocean, Radar & Sensor Systems 
Division located in Utica, New York. The notice will soon be published 
in the Federal Register.
    At the request of the State designee, the Department has reviewed 
the subject certification to specify that only the inspection operation 
of the printed circuit board assemblies are being shifted to Mexico.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include workers 
engaged in the inspection operation of the printed circuit board 
assemblies at Lockheed Martin, Ocean, Radar & Sensor Systems Division 
located in Utica, New York that were adversely affected by the shift in 
production of the inspection operation to Mexico.
    The amended notice applicable to NAFTA--00634 is hereby issued as 
follows:


[[Page 63737]]

    All workers engaged in the inspection operation of the printed 
circuit board assemblies at Lockheed Martin, Ocean, Radar & Sensor 
Systems Division located in Utica, New York who become totally or 
partially separated from employment on or after October 5, 1994 are 
eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the 
Trade Act of 1994.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 1st day of November 1995.
Russell T. Kile,
Acting Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-30155 Filed 12-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In re:

Pacific Gas & Electric Corp., et al.

 Debtors.

Chapter 11

Case No. 19-30088 Chapter 11

(Jointly Administered)

TRANSFER OF CLAIM OTHER THAN FOR SECURITY

A CLAIM HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS CASE or deemed filed under 11 U.S.C. § 

1111(a). Transferee hereby gives evidence and notice pursuant to Rule 3001(e)(2) of the Federal

Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure of the transfer, other than for security, of the claim referenced in 

this evidence and notice.

TRC Solutions, Inc.

Name of Transferor

Phone: (860) 298-9692

Last Four Digits of Acct #: N/A

Name and Address where notices and 

payments to transferee should be sent:

Whitebox Relative Value Partners, LP

c/o Whitebox Advisors

3033 Excelsior Blvd, Suite 300

Minneapolis, MN 55416-4675

Attn: Scott Specken

Whitebox Relative Value Partners, LP

Name of Transferee

Phone: (612) 253-6061

Last Four Digits of Acct #: N/A

Claim No: 74956

Debtor: Pacific Gas and Electric Company 

(19-30089)

Date Filed: October 21, 2019

Total Amount of Claim: $9,056,416.17

Transferred Amount of Claim: 

$9,056,416.17

I declare under penalty of perjury that the information provided in this notice is true and correct 

to the best of my knowledge and belief.

By:______________________________ Date:____________

Transferee/Transferee’s Agent

Penalty for making a false statement: Fine of up to $500,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years, 

or both. 18 U.S.C. 152 & 3571.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 211F48CB-C65B-4737-B784-44C85E9567FB

Mark Strefling

Partner & CEO

12/5/2019 | 16:18 PST

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5015 Filed: 12/06/19 Entered: 12/06/19 15:30:03 Page 1 of

2
By: Whitebox Advisors LLC its investment manager

Luke Harris

General Counsel - Corporate, Transactions & 

Litigation

DocuSign Envelope ID: FDA9E986-F4E0-4236-A1F6-30FEA62F2B3A

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5015 Filed: 12/06/19 Entered: 12/06/19 15:30:03 Page 2 of

2
#### Dennis R. Horgan, Respondent, *v.*Frenkel, Kovac *&*Company, Inc., Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

December 23, 1936.

*495
      *Alvin Jay Feldman [Nathan M. Hutner*of counsel], for the appellant.

*Harry L. Gutter,*for the respondent.

Per Curiam.

It was error to receive as evidence over defendant’s objection quotations reported by a quotation service bureau rendering its reports only to its broker subscribers, as same were not admissible under section 375-a of the Civil Practice Act. Although the witness may be competent to testify, proof of market value or in its absence fair value must be given as required by the rules of evidence. If the rule of *caveat emptor*applies but facts showing fiduciary relationship exist, same should be alleged in the complaint, to take the cause out of the rule. The answer here alleged defendant was entitled to commission under the agreement of sale.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.

All concur. Present — Lydon, Levy and Hammer, JJ.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# PHOTOS ANDVIDEOS

Search

Search

                                - All Images 
                                - Other 
                                - Space Shuttle 

                                - Upload Date
                                - Photo Date
                                - Title

----

Download Image: Full Size (1.29 MB)

Tags:USSPACECOM, Spanish Space Command

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
#### STATE v. HARVEY C. REGISTER, CARL GODWIN, JAMES REGISTER and JAMES JACKSON.

(Filed 22 March, 1944.)

Appeal by defendants from *Williams, J.,*at November Term, 1943, of HaeNett. No error.

*Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorneys-Generad Patton and Rhodes for the State.*

*J. R. Young and Neill McE. Salmon for defendants.*

Pee Cueiam.

Tbe defendants were indicted for conspiracy to commit a felonious assault upon tbe State’s witness, and also for assault upon him with a deadly weapon with intent to kill. There was a general verdict of guilty. While the evidence was conflicting, the jury .has accepted the State’s version of'the transaction. An examination of the record reveals no error in the trial. The exception to evidence of a declaration by one of the defendants cannot be sustained. This evidence was competent and there was no request that its effect be limited. *S. v. McKeithan,*203 N. C., 494, 166 S. E., 336. The exceptions to the charge are without merit. The judgment pronounced upon the verdict will not be disturbed.

No error.
**Exhibit 10.1**

 

**AMENDMENT TO**

 

**SAVVIS COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION**

**2003 Incentive Compensation Plan**

 

The SAVVISCommunications Corporation 2003 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended as set forth below, effective as of the date of adoption (the “Adoption Date”) of this amendment (the “Amendment”) by the Boardof Directors of SAVVIS Communications Corporation (the “Corporation”), subject to approval of this Amendment by the stockholders of the Corporation, as provided below: 

 

1. The first two sentence of Section 4 is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 

 

“4. STOCK SUBJECT TO THE PLAN 

 

“Subject to adjustment as provided in **Section 18** hereof, thenumber of shares of Stock available for issuance under the Plan shall be the sum of 40,000,000. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, the aggregate number of shares of Stock which cumulatively may be available for issuance pursuant to Awards otherthan Awards of Options shall not exceed 20,000,000 shares.” 

 

2. The Plan shall be unchanged in all other respects. 

 

3. This Amendment is adopted subject to approval within one year of the Adoption Date by the stockholders of the Corporation. If the stockholders fail to approve this Amendment within one year of the Adoption Date, no awards may be grantedunder the Plan covering shares of stock in excess of the number permitted under the Plan as in effect before the Adoption Date. 

 

* * * 

 

The foregoing Amendment to the Plan was duly adopted and approved by the Board of Directors of the Corporation on April 20, 2004, subject to approval ofthe Amendment by stockholders of the Corporation.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-23-00081-CR

Kenneth Paul BROWN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Atascosa County, Texas

Trial Court No. 22-10-0349-CRA

Honorable Mark Luitjen, Judge Presiding1

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED June 26, 2024.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

1 Sitting by assignment.
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 17 (Wednesday, January 27, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 4739]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-01622]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of the Secretary


List of Countries Requiring Cooperation With an International 
Boycott

    In accordance with section 999(a)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986, the Department of the Treasury is publishing a current list of 
countries which require or may require participation in, or cooperation 
with, an international boycott (within the meaning of section 999(b)(3) 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986).
    On the basis of the best information currently available to the 
Department of the Treasury, the following countries require or may 
require participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott 
(within the meaning of section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986).
Iraq
Kuwait
Lebanon
Libya
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
Syria
United Arab Emirates
Yemen

    Dated: January 19, 2016.
Danielle Rolfes,
International Tax Counsel, (Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. 2016-01622 Filed 1-26-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4810-25-P
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 239 (Wednesday, December 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 64029]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30386]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Illinois Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Illinois Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 9:00 
a.m. and adjourn at 6:30 p.m. on Thursday, January 18, 1995, at the 
Midland Hotel, 172 West Adams Street, Chicago, Illinois 60604. The 
purpose of the meeting is to hold a consultation: Focus on Affirmative 
Action.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Committee Chairperson Joe Mathewson, 
312-360-1110, or Constance M. Davis, Director of the Midwestern 
Regional Office, 312-353-8311 (TDD 312-353-8326). Hearing-impaired 
persons who will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign 
language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least five 
(5) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, December 6, 1995.
Carol-Lee Hurley,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 95-30386 Filed 12-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
EXHIBIT 11.1




                        SAVVIS COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
   CALCULATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE AND WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES
                             USED IN EPS CALCULATION
                                   (UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

For the Three-Months Ended                                                              September 30, 2002
                                                                                        ------------------
<S>                                                                                       <C>
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Common stock:
         Shares  outstanding  at beginning of period,  net of 485,631 shares
         subject to forfeiture                                                              93,541,009
         Weighted average shares,  net of treasury shares,  issued or vested
         during the three months ended September 30, 2002 (1,522 new shares issued)             75,362
                                                                                          ------------
                                                                                            93,616,371
                                                                                          ============
Loss attributable to common shareholders                                                  $(22,756,000)
                                                                                          ============
Basic and diluted loss per share                                                          $      (0.24)
                                                                                          ============
<CAPTION>

For the Nine-Months Ended                                                               September 30, 2002
                                                                                        ------------------
<S>                                                                                       <C>
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Common stock:
         Shares  outstanding  at beginning of period,  net of 740,928 shares subject to
         forfeiture                                                                         93,177,425
         Weighted average shares,  net of treasury shares,  issued or vested during the
         nine months ended September 30, 2002 (109,809 new shares issued)                      336,172
                                                                                          ------------
                                                                                            93,513,597
                                                                                          ============
Loss attributable to common shareholders                                                  $(70,093,000)
                                                                                          ============
Basic and diluted loss per share                                                          $      (0.75)
                                                                                          ============
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             872
<SECURITIES>                                        46
<RECEIVABLES>                                      558
<ALLOWANCES>                                        16
<INVENTORY>                                        347
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,281
<PP&E>                                           8,071
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,480
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,696
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,827
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              613
<PREFERRED>                                        240
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        (48)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,696
<SALES>                                          2,570
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,570
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,573
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     7
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     2
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  83
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      4
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  3
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         3
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 236 (Friday, December 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63114-63115]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-29966]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
[CGD08-95-022]


Houston/Galveston Navigation Safety Advisory Committee; 
Navigation Subcommittee Meeting

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Navigation Subcommittee of the Houston/Galveston 
Navigation Safety Advisory Committee will meet to discuss various 
navigation safety matters affecting navigation in the Houston/Galveston 
port area.

DATES: The meeting will be held from 9:30 am. to 11 a.m., on Thursday, 
January 4, 1996.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Blackthorn Memorial, U.S. 
Coast Guard Base Galveston, 1 Ferry Road, Galveston, TX 77553.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. M.M. Ledet, Recording Secretary, Commander, Eighth Coast Guard 

[[Page 63115]]
District (oan), Room 1211, Hale Boggs Federal Building, 501 Magazine 
Street, New Orleans, LA 70130-3396, telephone (504) 589-4686.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice of this meeting is given pursuant to 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2 Sec.  1 et seq. The 
meeting is open to the public. Members of the public may present 
written or oral statements at the meeting. The agenda for the meeting 
will consist of discussion of previous recommendations and presentation 
of new items for consideration.

    Dated: November 22, 1995.
R.C. North,
Rear Admiral U.S. Coast Guard Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 95-29966 Filed 12-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-14-M
Exhibit 10.14
  
  Re: Management Agreement Renewals
   
    
    Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
    
    SSB Orion Futures Fund L.P.
    
    CMF Winton Feeder LP I
    
    CMF Winton Master Fund L.P.
    
    Citigroup Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
    
    AURORA III
    
    CMF Institutional Futures Portfolio LP
    
    Citigroup Abingdon Futures Fund L.P.
    
    Citigroup Global Futures Fund Ltd.
    By:
    
    /s/ Jennifer Magro

Jennifer MagroChief Financial Officer & Director
 WINTON CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
 By:
    
    /s/ Martin Hunt
 Print Name:
    
    Martin Hunt