alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio , Texas** 

June 30, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00772

- CR

Jonathan Jose GUILLEN

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR2647 Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this appeal was filed on April 29, 2015, completing the record. Appellant’s counsel was informed by email on that date that the record had been filed and appellant’s brief was therefore due. On June 1, 2015, the court granted appellant a thirty

- day extension of time to file the brief and ordered the brief due June 29, 2015. Appellant has filed a motion requesting an additional forty

- five day extension of time to file the brief.

We grant the mo tion, and order appellant’s brief due July 16, 2015 (75 days after the original due date)

. Counsel is advised that no further extensions of time will be granted absent a motion that (1) demonstrates extraordinary circumstances justifying further delay, (2 ) advise s the court of the efforts counsel has expended in preparing the brief, and (3) provide s the court reasonable assurance that the brief will be completed and filed by the requested extended

deadline.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the sai d

court on this 30th day of June, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT
        32.1
  **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 **(18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**
 
 
 In
        connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Summit Environmental
        Corporation, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31,
        2005 (the “Report”), I, Chris Dellinges, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
        hereby certify that to my knowledge:
 
 (1) The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78o(d)); and
 
 (2) The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated:
        July 28, 2005
 */s/
        Chris Dellinges*
 Chris
        Dellinges
 Chief
        Financial Officer
 
 
 The
        above
        certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB
        or as a separate disclosure document.
**Exhibit      32.0**

**SECTION      1350 CERTIFICATIONS**

|   | (1) | The                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months                ended                June 30, 2006 (Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section                13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78m(a)                or                78o(d), and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | August                9, 2006 | By:    | /s/                Thomas F. Prisby                                                  |
|--------|-------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                          |   | Thomas                F. Prisby* *                                              |
|   |                          |   | *Chairman                of the Board and Chief Executive Officer*                   |
|   |                          |   |                                                                                 |
|   |                          |   |                                                                                 |
|   |                          |   |                                                                                 |
| Date:  | August                9, 2006 | By:    | /s/                Charles V. Cole                                                   |
|   |                          |   | Charles                V. Cole* *                                               |
|   |                          |   | *Executive                Vice President and Chief Financial                Officer* |

*A      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the      Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to CFS Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained      by CFS Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission      or      its staff upon request.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-MOS                     
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                          SEP-30-1997   
<CASH>                                $  1,707,922                 
<SECURITIES>                                     0                 
<RECEIVABLES>                              564,647                 
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0                 
<INVENTORY>                                      0                 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         4,490,944                 
<PP&E>                                  68,966,217                 
<DEPRECIATION>                          17,286,889                 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          57,627,745                 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    2,483,295                 
<BONDS>                                          0                 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0                 
<PREFERRED>                                      0                 
<COMMON>                                         0                 
<OTHER-SE>                               3,037,458                 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            57,627,745                 
<SALES>                                 12,863,526                 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        13,001,441                 
<CGS>                                            0                 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0                 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         8,756,709                 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0                 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       3,489,481                 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            840,859                 
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0                 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        840,859                 
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0                 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0                 
<CHANGES>                                        0                 
<NET-INCOME>                               840,859                 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 4.83                 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 4.83                 
        


</TABLE>
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5653 

To provide for recipients of community development block grant funds to 

return such funds to the Treasury of the United States without prejudice, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 

Mr. SALMON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To provide for recipients of community development block 

grant funds to return such funds to the Treasury of 

the United States without prejudice, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘CDBG Grant Return 

5 Act of 2014’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5653 IH

1 SEC. 2. RETURN OF UNUSED GRANT FUNDS. 

2 Section 106 of the Housing and Community Develop3 ment Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5306) is amended by adding 

4 at the end the following new subsection: 

5 ‘‘(g) RETURN OF UNUSED GRANT FUNDS.— 

6 ‘‘(1) AUTHORITY.—Any metropolitan city, 

7 urban county, unit of general local government, In8 dian tribe, or insular area that directly or indirectly 

9 receives amounts pursuant to this section may, at 

10 the sole discretion of such entity, return to the 

11 Treasury any or all of such amounts, subject to 

12 paragraph (2). 

13 ‘‘(2) RETENTION AND USE OF 10 PERCENT OF

14 RETURN AMOUNT.—In returning any amounts pur15 suant to this subsection, a metropolitan city, urban 

16 county, unit of general local government, Indian 

17 tribe, or insular area, such city, county unit, tribe, 

18 or insular area may retain and use for any purpose, 

19 at the discretion of such city, county unit, tribe, or 

20 insular area and notwithstanding any other provision 

of this title, an amount not exceeding 1 21 ⁄10 of the 

22 total of such amounts otherwise to be returned. 

23 ‘‘(3) TREATMENT OF FUTURE GRANT

24 AMOUNTS.—Any return of amounts pursuant to this 

25 subsection shall not in any manner affect the future 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5653 IH

1 eligibility of such entity for grant funds under this 

2 title or the amount of such grant funds provided. 

3 ‘‘(4) TREATMENT OF RETURNED AMOUNTS.— 

4 Any amounts returned to the Treasury pursuant to 

5 this subsection shall be covered into the general fund 

6 and shall not be reallocated, redistributed, or other7 wise made available under this title.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### The Pfaudler Barm Extracting and Bunging Apparatus Company, Respondent, v. Casper Pfaudler and others, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Opinion by

Barker, J.;

Smith, P. J., not sitting.
#### Samuel W. Hastings, Late Constable, etc., Appellant, v. Jacob Nagel and Others, Respondents.

Motion for reargument dented, with costs.
Order entered September 17, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 00313
- CR CARLA GAY JOHNSON, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Coun ty Criminal Court No. 11

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. MA17
- 40154
- L



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s September 13, 2018 second motion for extension of time
to file her brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed on or before September 2 7 , 2018. Appellant is cautioned that the failure to file a brief by that date may result in the appeal being abated for a hearing. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8 (b).

.
/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,093,154
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  150,646
<ALLOWANCES>                                    44,000
<INVENTORY>                                    762,726
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,964,005
<PP&E>                                          70,674
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,644
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,732,330
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,293
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,931
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,720,399
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,732,330
<SALES>                                         16,803
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,159
<CGS>                                            8,393
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,393
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               316,320
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,629
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (309,183)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (309,183)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   309,183
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)


</TABLE>
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Kevin Wiemken v. Waller County, et al.

Appellate case number: 01

- 19

- 00628

- CV

Trial court case number: 2019

- 03

- 8723

Trial court: 506th District Court of Waller County

The appellant, Kevin Wiemken, has filed a second motion for default judgment against appellees, arguing appellees “did not answer in a timely manner” whether they have jurisdiction and “what species the appellee’s [sic] will take for payment for an [sic] alleged property taxes.” Appellant’s motion does not comply with the Texas Ru le s of Appellate

Procedure

. Rule 10 .1 requires a motion to , among other things, (a) “state with particularity the grounds on which it is based;” (b) “set forth the order or relief sought;” and (c) “in civil
cases [such as this one], . . . contain or be acc ompanied by a certificate stating that the filing party conferred, or made a reasonable attempt to confer, with all other parties about the merits of the motion and whether those parties oppose the motion.” T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 10.1(a). Accordingly, the appellant’s motion for default judgment is denied

. Appellant is also notified that the deadline for filing the clerk’s record has passed

. T he district clerk notified this Court on November 12, 2019

, that a deposit was requested

for preparation of the clerk ’s record b ut appellant has not paid the deposit

. Appellant must submit written evidence showing appellant has paid or made arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the record within 10 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not submit proof of payment or arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record, we may dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting indiv idually Acting for the Court

Date: ___ November 26, 2019

___________________
No. 17,763.

#### Cephas Carroll, et al. *v.*The Oxford Farmers Ditch Company.

(299 P. [2d] 116)

Decided July 9, 1956.

Mr. Charles E. Sabin, for plaintiffs in error.

Vena Pointer, Messrs. Burris & Bumgardner, for defendant in error.

*Eh Banc.*

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed without written opinion.
#### STATE v. CLYDE YORK.

(Filed 29 October, 1958.)

Appeal by defendant from *Armstrong, J.,*at July 21, 1958 Term of Forsyth.

Criminal prosecution upon a bill of indictment charging defendant with the crime of subornation of perjury, G.S. 14-210, in the way and manner specified.

Defendant, in open court, pleaded not guilty.

The case was submitted to the jury upon evidence offered by the State, and by the defendant, under the charge of the court.

Verdict: Guilty of subornation of perjury as charged in the bill of indictment in this case.

Judgment: That the defendant be confined in the State’s prison at Raleigh for a period of not less than seven nor more than ten years, to be assigned to do labor as provided by law.

Defendant, through his counsel, excepts and appeals to Supreme Court and assigns error.

*Attorney General Seawell, Assistant Attorney General Harry W. McGalliard, for the State.*

*Spry, White & Hamrick for defendant, appellant.*

Per Curiam.

Defendant, as appellant, presents for consideration on this appeal nineteen assignments of error based upon like number of exceptions taken during the course of the trial, and to matters occurring in Superior Court. It is noted, however, that in nine cases the exception is to the action of the court in sustaining objections to questions asked in behalf of defendant. In each of these instances the record fails to show what the answer of the witness would have been, so as to indicate its materiality.

After careful consideration the exceptions (1) to denial of motions for judgment as of nonsuit, aptly made, (2) to portions of the charge, (3) to remarks of the judge, (4) to the failure of the trial judge to charge the law in various aspects, and (5) to all others, error for *133which «the verdict and judgment below should be set aside is not made to appear.

Hence in the trial below there is

No Error.

PARKER, J., not sitting.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5430 Filed: 01/21/20 Entered: 01/21/20 15:41:47 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5430 Filed: 01/21/20 Entered: 01/21/20 15:41:47 Page 2 of

2
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 110 (Wednesday, June 9, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 32779]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13814]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than July 2, 2010.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Ivan Hurwitz, Vice President) 
33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001:
    1. Urban National Holding Corp., New York, New York; to become a 
bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of 
Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp., and thereby indirectly acquire voting 
shares of Metropolitan National Bank, both of New York, New York.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 3, 2010.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-13814 Filed 6-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

                  AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC.

                HSI ASSET LOAN OBLIGATION TRUST 2007-AR1


     I, David M. Friedman, a duly authorized officer of American Home Mortgage
Servicing, Inc., as servicer (the "Servicer"), pursuant to the Master Mortgage
Loan Purchase and Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 21, 2006, among HSBC
Bank USA, National Association, the Servicer and American Home Mortgage Corp.
(the "Agreement"), hereby certify that:

     1.    A review of the Servicer's activities during the period from and
including January 1, 2007 through and including December 31, 2007 (the
"Reporting Period") and of the Servicer's performance under the Agreement and
any other applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.

     2.    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement and any other applicable
servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate
this 10th day of March, 2008.


                                            By:/s/David M. Friedman
                                               -----------------------------
                                            Name: David M. Friedman
                                            Title: Executive Vice President