alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of China Multimedia, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 (the "Report"), I, Wilson Cheung, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations. /s/Wilson CheungWilson Cheung, Chief Executive Officer December 29, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 237 (Monday, December 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63564-63565]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30015]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice No. 2297]


Overseas Schools Advisory Council; Notice of Meeting

    The Overseas Schools Advisory Council, Department of State, will 
hold its Executive Committee Meeting on Thursday, January 18, 1996 at 
9:30 a.m. in Conference Room 1205, Department of State Building, 2201 C 
Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. The meeting is open to the public.
    The Overseas Schools Advisory Council works closely with the U.S. 
business community in improving those American-sponsored schools 
overseas which are assisted by the Department of 

[[Page 63565]]
State and which are attended by dependents of U.S. government families 
and children of employees of U.S. corporations and foundations abroad.
    This meeting will deal with issues related to the work and the 
support provided by the Overseas Schools Advisory Council to the 
American-sponsored overseas schools.
    Members of the general public may attend the meeting and join in 
the discussion, subject to the instructions of the Chairman. Admittance 
of public members will be limited to the seating available. Access to 
the State Department is controlled and individual building passes are 
required for each attendee. Persons who plan to attend should so advise 
the office of Dr. Ernest N. Mannino, Department of State, Office of 
Overseas Schools, SA-29, Room 245, Washington, D.C. 20522-2902, 
telephone 703-875-7800, prior to December 30, 1995. Visitors will be 
asked to provide their date of birth and Social Security number at the 
time they register their intention to attend and must carry a valid 
photo ID with them to the meeting. All attendees must use the C Street 
entrance to the building.

    Dated: November 20, 1995.
Ernest N. Mannino,
Executive Secretary, Overseas Schools Advisory Council.
[FR Doc. 95-30015 Filed 12-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-24-M
exv10w26






EXHIBIT 10.26




July 1, 2009

Peter Slover

c/o Anadys Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

3115 Merryfield Row

San Diego, CA 92121




Dear Peter,



In light of your proven capability, productivity and commitment to Anadys, effective July 1, 2009
and subject to the at-will nature of your employment, you are being promoted to Vice President,
Finance and Operations with responsibility for the finance and operations functions at Anadys and
will report to me.



In connection with your promotion, your base salary will increase to $205,000 per annum effective
July 1, 2009 and you will receive the severance and change in control benefits as set forth in the
Severance and Change in Control Agreement being provided concurrently herewith. You have also been
granted an Option to purchase 50,000 shares of Anadys Common Stock. This option has a four year
vesting schedule and will vest 1/4 at July 1, 2010, with the remainder vesting monthly over the next
three years. This option has a grant date of July 1, 2009 and an exercise price of $1.86 per
share. This stock option is subject to the terms and conditions outlined in Anadys’ 2004 Equity
Incentive Plan.



Also starting on July 1st, 2009, pursuant to the terms of the Executive Officer Bonus
Plan (the “Executive Bonus Plan”), your target bonus opportunity will be 30% of your base salary
and calculated as set forth in the Executive Bonus Plan. Any bonus awarded for 2009 performance
will be calculated based on six months of service under the Executive Bonus Plan in your capacity
as Vice President, Finance and Operations and six months of service under the Employee Bonus Plan
in your capacity as Senior Director, Finance and Corporate Controller. However, as stated in the
Executive Bonus Plan, the Compensation Committee retains absolute discretion to determine whether
any bonus payments will be made in a particular year and the amount of any bonus payments.



Pete, thank you again for your contributions to Anadys and congratulations on your promotion.




Sincerely,




/s/ Stephen T. Worland




Stephen T. Worland, Ph.D.

President & Chief Executive Officer
81,7('67$7(6%$1.5837&<&2857

1RUWKHUQ'LVWULFWRI&DOLIRUQLD

,QUH

'HEWRUV

%DQNUXSWF\1R

561R

+HDULQJ'DWH

7LPH

5HOLHI)URP6WD\&RYHU6KHHW

,QVWUXFWLRQV &RPSOHWH FDSWLRQ DQG 6HFWLRQ $ IRU DOO PRWLRQV  &RPSOHWH 6HFWLRQ % IRU PRELOH KRPHV PRWRU YHKLFOHV DQG SHUVRQDO SURSHUW\

&RPSOHWH6HFWLRQ&IRUUHDOSURSHUW\8WLOL]H6HFWLRQ&DVQHFHVVDU\,IPRYLQJSDUW\LVQRWDVHFXUHGFUHGLWRUEULHIO\VXPPDUL]HWKHQDWXUH

RIWKHPRWLRQLQ6HFWLRQ'

$ 'DWH3HWLWLRQ)LOHG &KDSWHU

3ULRUKHDULQJVRQWKLVREOLJDWLRQ /DVW'D\WR)LOH&RPSODLQWV

% 'HVFULSWLRQRISHUVRQDOSURSHUW\FROODWHUDOHJ)RUG7DXUXV

6HFXUHG&UHGLWRU>@RUOHVVRU>@

)DLUPDUNHWYDOXH BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 6RXUFHRIYDOXHBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

&RQWUDFW%DODQFH BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 3UH3HWLWLRQ'HIDXOW BBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

0RQWKO\3D\PHQW BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 1RRIPRQWKVBBBBBBBBBBB

,QVXUDQFH$GYDQFH BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 3RVW3HWLWLRQ'HIDXOW BBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

1RRIPRQWKVBBBBBBBBBBB

& 'HVFULSWLRQRIUHDOSURSHUW\FROODWHUDOHJ6LQJOHIDPLO\UHVLGHQFH2DNODQG&$

)DLUPDUNHWYDOXHBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 6RXUFHRIYDOXHBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB ,IDSSUDLVDOGDWHBBBBBBBBBBB

0RYLQJ3DUW\
VSRVLWLRQILUVWWUXVWGHHGVHFRQGDEVWUDFWHWF

$SSUR[%DO BBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 3UH3HWLWLRQ'HIDXOW BBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

$VRIGDWHBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 1RRIPRQWKVBBBBBBBBBBBB

0RSD\PHQW BBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 3RVW3HWLWLRQ'HIDXOW BBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

1RWLFHRI'HIDXOWGDWHBBBBBBBBBB 1RRIPRQWKVBBBBBBBBBBBB

1RWLFHRI7UXVWHH
V6DOHBBBBBBBBBB $GYDQFHV6HQLRU/LHQV BBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

6SHFLI\QDPHDQGVWDWXVRIRWKHUOLHQVDQGHQFXPEUDQFHVLINQRZQHJWUXVWGHHGVWD[OLHQVHWF

3RVLWLRQ $PRXQW 0R3D\PHQW 'HIDXOWV

VW7UXVW'HHGBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB BBBBBBBBBBBBBBB BBBBBBBBBBBBBBB BBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

QG7UXVW'HHGBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB BBBBBBBBBBBBBBB BBBBBBBBBBBBBBB BBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

7RWDO BBBBBBBBBBBBBBB BBBBBBBBBBBBBBB BBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

' 2WKHUSHUWLQHQWLQIRUPDWLRQ

BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

6LJQDWXUH

BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

3ULQWRU7\SH1DPH

$WWRUQH\IRUBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

&$1%'RFXPHQWV1RUWKHUQ'LVWULFWRI&DOLIRUQLD

Dated:

3*	( &RUSRUDWLRQ 3DFLILF *DV 	 (OHFWULF &RPSDQ\  '0

06/26/2019

9:30 am

01/29/2019 

N/A

The Motion seeks limited relief from stay with respect to a potential appeal of certain orders entered by the Federal 

Energy Regulatory Commission, as set forth in greater detail in the Motion.



David M. Stern

1H[W(UD (QHUJ\

V'DYLG06WHUQ

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2401 Filed: 06/05/19 Entered: 06/05/19 14:09:15 Page 1 of

1
NAI-1509179920v1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Bruce S. Bennett (SBN 105430) 

Joshua M. Mester (SBN 194783) 

James O. Johnston (SBN 167330) 

JONES DAY 

555 South Flower Street 

Fiftieth Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90071.2300 

Telephone: +1.213.489.3939 

Facsimile: +1.213.243.2539 

E-mail: bbennett@jonesday.com 

 jmester@jonesday.com 

 jjohnston@jonesday.com 

Attorneys for PG&E Shareholders

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION 

- and - 

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, 

Debtors.

Bankruptcy Case 

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Chapter 11 

(Lead Case) 

(Jointly Administered) 

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION 

FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY 

ANNA KORDAS PRO HAC VICE

Affects PG&E Corporation 

Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company 

Affects both Debtors 

* All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case, 

No. 19-30088 (DM).

Signed and Filed: October 2, 2019

________________________________________

DENNIS MONTALI

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

Entered on Docket 

October 03, 2019

EDWARD J. EMMONS, CLERK 

U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4086 Filed: 10/02/19 Entered: 10/03/19 11:50:56 Page 1 of

3
NAI-1509179920v1 

- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Anna Kordas, whose business address and telephone number is: 

Anna Kordas 

JONES DAY 

250 Vesey Street 

New York, New York 10281.1047 

Telephone: +1.212.326.3939 

Facsimile: +1.212.755.7306 

E-mail: akordas@jonesday.com 

and who is an active member in good standing of the bars of New York and New Jersey, having 

applied in the above-entitled action for admission to practice in the Northern District of California 

on a pro hac vice basis, representing certain PG&E Shareholders. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application is granted, subject to the terms and 

conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate appearance pro hac 

vice. Service of papers upon and communication with co-counsel designated in the application 

will constitute notice to the represented party. All future filings in this action are subject to the 

Bankruptcy Local Rules and Electronic Case Filing Procedures adopted by the United States 

Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California. 

**END OF ORDER** 

 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4086 Filed: 10/02/19 Entered: 10/03/19 11:50:56 Page 2 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4086 Filed: 10/02/19 Entered: 10/03/19 11:50:56 Page 3 of

3
#### The First National Bank of Herkimer, Plaintiff, *v.*William Dise, as Commissioner of Herkimer County Public Welfare District, and the County of Herkimer in the State of New York, Charles D. Baum and Mary I. Baum, His Wife, Defendants.

Supreme Court, Herkimer County,

January 5, 1937.

*James P. O’Donnell,*for the plaintiff.

*C. J. Winslow,*for the defendant William Dise, as commissioner of public welfare, and for the county of Herkimer.

*John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General*[F. *B. Chant, Deputy Attorney-General,*of counsel], *amicus curiae.*

Gregg, J.

This is an action to set aside a deed on the grounds of fraud in violation of the Debtor and Creditor Law.

In the summer of 1935 the defendant Charles D. Baum, who was then seventy-seven years of age, applied to the defendant welfare commissioner of Herkimer county for an old age pension.

He and his wife, who was then sixty-eight years of age, owned as tenants by the entirety a small but comfortable home in the village of Herkimer in Herkimer county, N. Y., worth about $2,500. *489They did not owe any debt except two notes, for about $135, which they had indorsed for an indigent son at the plaintiff bank.

The defendant welfare commissioner requested a deed of the property before he would grant the pension. Thereafter the deed in question was executed and delivered and the county of Herkimer began making pension payments to the defendant Charles Baum. Life use of the premises was reserved to Mr. and Mrs. Baum and to the survivor of them. Up to the time of the trial the county paid certain taxes and advanced for the support and medical attention for the defendant Charles D. Baum $341.24.

It is conceded that there was no actual fraud in the transaction. Plaintiff claims that section 130 of the Public Welfare Law is unconstitutional and relies on constructive fraud under the Debtor and Creditor Law to set aside the deed. There is no evidence in the case that the transfer by them of their $2,500 home, in which they reserved the life use to themselves and the survivor of them, rendered them insolvent. It is a matter of common knowledge that the rental value of a home worth $2,500 is between fifteen and twenty dollars per month, so that if the plaintiff had enforced its judgment against the life interest of the defendants Baum, it would undoubtedly have been paid before this time. At any rate there is no evidence to the contrary.

In my opinion section 130 of the Public Welfare Law is constitutional and the welfare commissioner had a right to take and accept the deed for and on behalf of the county. The facts do not warrant a finding that the transaction was tainted with constructive fraud within the meaning of the Debtor and Creditor Law.

In view of the facts in this case it is not necessary to pass on the question of whether or not section 130 of the Public Welfare Law supersedes the provisions of the Debtor and Creditor Law.

Plaintiff’s complaint should be dismissed, with costs.
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5331 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2014 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 73839 Gorgonio Drive in Twentynine Palms, 

California, as the ‘‘Colonel M.J. ‘Mac’ Dube, USMC 

Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5331 RFS

1 SECTION 1. COLONEL M.J. ‘‘MAC’’ DUBE, USMC POST OF2 FICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 73839 Gorgonio Drive in 

5 Twentynine Palms, California, shall be known and des6 ignated as the ‘‘Colonel M.J. ‘Mac’ Dube, USMC Post Of7 fice Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Colonel M.J. ‘Mac’ 

12 Dube, USMC Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 17, 

2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5415 

To authorize the use of military force against international terrorism. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2014 

Mr. WOLF (for himself, Mr. GIBBS, Mr. JOLLY, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, and 

Mr. KINZINGER of Illinois) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To authorize the use of military force against international 

terrorism. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Authorization for Use 

5 of Military Force against International Terrorism Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF ARMED FORCES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The President is authorized, with 

8 the close consultation, coordination, and cooperation with 

9 NATO and regional allies, to use all necessary and appro10 priate force against those countries, organizations, or perVerDate Mar 15 2010 22:17 Sep 09, 2014 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5415.IH H5415

asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5415 IH

1 sons associated with or supporting terrorist groups, in2 cluding al Qaeda and its regional affiliates, the Islamic 

3 State of Iraq and Syria, al Shabaab, Boko Haram, and 

4 any other emerging regional terrorist groups that share 

5 a common violent extremist ideology with such terrorist 

6 groups, regional affiliates, or emerging terrorist groups, 

7 in order to eliminate all such terrorist groups and prevent 

8 any future acts of international terrorism against the 

9 United States or its allies by such terrorist groups, coun10 tries, organizations, or persons. 

11 (b) WAR POWERS RESOLUTION REQUIREMENTS.— 

12 (1) SPECIFIC STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION.— 

13 Consistent with section 8(a)(1) of the War Powers 

14 Resolution, Congress declares that this section is in15 tended to constitute specific statutory authorization 

16 within the meaning of section 5(b) of the War Pow17 ers Resolution. 

18 (2) APPLICABILITY OF OTHER REQUIRE19 MENTS.—Nothing in this Act supercedes any re20 quirement of the War Powers Resolution. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In re Donny Joe Curry

No. 06

- 15

- 00080

- CR Original Mandamus Proceeding

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice

Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice

Moseley participating.

As stated in the C ourt’s opinion of this date, we find that Relator is not entitled to the relief

sought. Therefore, we deny the petition

.

RENDERED MAY 22, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                            8984
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 38375
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       2003
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                            1708
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                              3711
<LOANS>                                         252425
<ALLOWANCE>                                       2899
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  307163
<DEPOSITS>                                      284444
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               1364
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         12347
<OTHER-SE>                                        9006
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  307163
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  17238
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  251
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  1011
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 18500
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                8135
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                8135
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            10365
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      360
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   5489
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   5888
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        5888
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      3532
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.03
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    9.01
<LOANS-NON>                                        155
<LOANS-PAST>                                      1634
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   1634
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  2539
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 2899
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              2899
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            539
        

</TABLE>
----

|   | /s/ Westley V. Thompson                                |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Westley V. Thompson                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|   | President, SLF U.S.                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|   | (principal executive officer)                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | August 12, 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                   |

----
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 24-60051

____________

DeSanto Rollins, 

Plaintiff—Appellant,

versus

Lane Kiffin, in his individual capacity and official capacity as the Head 

Football Coach for the University of Mississippi; University of 

Mississippi; John Does 1-10, 

Defendants—Appellees.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:23-CV-356

______________________________

Before Southwick, Haynes, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

This case concerns Plaintiff-Appellant DeSanto Rollins’s allegations 

of race, sex, and disability discrimination against Defendant-Appellees Lane 

Kiffin and the University of Mississippi (“UM”). Specifically, Rollins

brought the following claims against UM and Kiffin in his official capacity: 

(1) Title VI racial discrimination; (2) Title IX sex discrimination; (3) 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 5, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 24-60051 Document: 67-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/05/2024
No. 24-60051

2

discrimination pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act; (4) 

discrimination pursuant to the Rehabilitation Act; (5) gross negligence; and 

(6) negligence. Rollins also alleged a violation of the Equal Protection Clause 

and intentional infliction of emotional distress against Kiffin in his individual 

capacity.

Appellees moved to dismiss Rollins’s claims pursuant to Federal 

Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). After the parties introduced 

matters outside the pleadings, the district court converted Appellees’ motion 

to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) into a motion for summary judgment. 

The district court granted the Rule 12(b)(1) motion, finding Rollins’s claims 

were barred by the Eleventh Amendment. The district court also granted the 

converted Rule 56 motion, finding that no genuine disputes of material fact 

precluded summary judgment on Rollins’s claims.

Rollins appealed the district court’s order except as to the gross 

negligence and negligence claims. We find no error in the district court’s 

determination that Rollins has failed to carry his burden pursuant to Rule 

12(b)(1) and Rule 56. Accordingly, the district court’s order dismissing 

Rollins’s claims is AFFIRMED.

Case: 24-60051 Document: 67-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/05/2024