alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5638 

To allow railroad employees to remain on duty as necessary to clear a 

blockage of vehicular traffic at grade crossings. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 

Mr. PETRI (for himself, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, and Mr. DUFFY) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 

and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To allow railroad employees to remain on duty as necessary 

to clear a blockage of vehicular traffic at grade crossings. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GRADE CROSSING EXCEPTION. 

4 (a) AMENDMENT.—Chapter 211 of title 49, United 

5 States Code, is amended by inserting at the end the fol6 lowing new section: 

7 ‘‘§ 21110. Grade crossing exception. 

8 ‘‘Employees may be allowed to remain or go on duty 

9 for a period in excess of the limitations established under 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5638 IH

1 this chapter to the extent necessary to clear a blockage 

2 of vehicular traffic at a grade crossing.’’. 

3 (b) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of sections for 

4 such chapter 211 is amended by inserting at the end the 

5 following new item: 

‘‘21110. Grade crossing exception.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet and statement of operations found on pages 3 and 5 of the company's Form
10Q for the year-to-date and is qualified in its entirety by refernce to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                                 0
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                        2,050,233
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                          2,149,831
<EQUITIES>                                     151,148
<MORTGAGE>                                     789,117
<REAL-ESTATE>                                   99,888
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               3,184,268
<CASH>                                         649,015
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,201,073
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              2,195,007
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                   3,489
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        1,548,669
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,900
<OTHER-SE>                                     659,777
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,201,073
<PREMIUMS>                                   1,886,260
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            210,180
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               5,183
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  61,338
<BENEFITS>                                   1,904,507
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           154,547
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                103,907
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (832)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            104,739
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   104,739
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Exhibit J

Summary of Jenner & Block LLP Blended Hourly Rates 

(Customary and Comparable Compensation Disclosures)

Timekeeper Category

Blended Hourly Rate

Worked and Billed 

January 2018 –

December 2018 

(Excluding Bankruptcy 

Matters)

Billed in this Fee 

Application

Partners & Special Counsel $769 $767.14

20+ years since admission $820 $945.90

13-19 years since admission $726 $755.12

0-12 years since admission $700 $706.07

Associates $529 $509.89

6+ years since admission $620 $663.74

 4-5 years since admission $588 $580.57

0-3 years since admission $506 $447.95

Paraprofessionals $284 $315.55

Blended Rate for All Attorneys $594 $587.97

Blended Rate for All Timekeepers $567 $576.15

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4749-10 Filed: 11/14/19 Entered: 11/14/19 17:30:16 Page 1

of 1
EXHIBIT 12.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to Qiao Xing
Mobile, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under
our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of Qiao Xing Mobiles disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in Qiao Xing Mobiles internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the period
covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, Qiao Xing Mobiles internal
control over financial reporting; and
  a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect Qiao Xing Mobiles ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role
in Qiao Xing Mobiles internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: June 30, 2010
    By:
    /s/ David LiDavid LiChief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT C 

 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4731-3 Filed: 11/14/19 Entered: 11/14/19 15:02:36 Page 1

of 2
Name of Professional Position Hourly Rate

Total Hours

Billed

Total

Compensation

Bradley Sharp President & CEO 685.00 $               314.40 $      205,945.25

R. Brian Calvert Sr. Managing Director 640.00                  436.00         264,896.00

Thomas Jeremiassen Sr. Managing Director 575.00                  252.80         134,435.00

Eric Held Managing Director 495.00                    12.00              5,940.00

Nicholas Troszak Managing Director 485.00                  355.50         155,418.25

James Armstrong Director 375.00                    94.70            35,512.50

Shelly Cuff Director 360.00                  401.40         140,076.00

Spencer Ferrero Director 350.00                  249.00            83,947.50

Andrew Wagner Director 350.00                    77.80            27,230.00

Thomas Frey Sr. Associate 325.00                    24.50              7,962.50

Cathy Vance Associate 375.00                    74.20            27,825.00

Rowen Dizon Associate 230.00                      5.70              1,311.00

   2,298.00 $   1,090,499.00

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4731-3 Filed: 11/14/19 Entered: 11/14/19 15:02:36 Page 2

of 2
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 5079    Filed: 12/11/19    Entered: 12/11/19 18:05:39    Page 1 of3

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 5079    Filed: 12/11/19    Entered: 12/11/19 18:05:39    Page 2 of3

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 5079    Filed: 12/11/19    Entered: 12/11/19 18:05:39    Page 3 of3
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                           PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                               OF NATCO GROUP INC.
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ryan S. Liles, Vice President
and Controller of NATCO Group Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, to my
knowledge, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

                                                 /s/ RYAN S. LILES
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Name:    Ryan S. Liles
                                            Date:    May 15, 2003



A signed original of this written statement as required by Section 906 has been
provided to NATCO Group Inc. and will be retained by NATCO Group Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4678 Filed: 11/12/19 Entered: 11/12/19 14:23:03 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4678 Filed: 11/12/19 Entered: 11/12/19 14:23:03 Page 2 of

2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EXHIBIT F

DISBURSEMENT SUMMARY

EXPENSES AMOUNT

Travel $26,477.63

Photocopy & Related Expenses $1,137.38

Outside Printing Services $419.83

UPS $406.30

In-City Transportation $137.22

TOTAL DISBURSEMENT $28,578.36

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4749-6 Filed: 11/14/19 Entered: 11/14/19 17:30:16 Page 1

of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5630 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5630

 To amend the Inspector General Act of 1976 to fill Inspector General 
                   vacancies, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 18, 2014

  Mr. Murphy of Florida (for himself, Mr. Rice of South Carolina, Ms. 
   Kuster, Mr. Swalwell of California, Mr. Jolly, Mr. Mulvaney, Ms. 
 Sinema, and Mr. Peters of California) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Inspector General Act of 1976 to fill Inspector General 
                   vacancies, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Inspector General Vacancy Act of 
2014''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

    Section 3 of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(h) Nomination of Inspector General To Fill a Vacancy.--If the 
President does not nominate an Inspector General pursuant to subsection 
(a) within 180 days after a vacancy for the Inspector General, the 
individual serving as interim Inspector General shall be deemed to be 
appointed under such subsection, by and with the advice and consent of 
the Senate.''.
                                 <all>
```
#







Exhibit 99.2







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pawnbroker.com, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bill Galine, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









/s/ William Galine



William Galine

Acting Chief Financial Officer

August 14, 2002
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 10, 2019

No. 04-19-00698-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.R.B., JR., A CHILD,

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017-PA-02035

Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

A supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s order striking appellant K.B.’s 

Petition in Intervention and to Modify Final Orders has been filed. The order was signed 

November 22, 2019. K.B.’s prematurely filed notice of appeal from the order is therefore 

effective and deemed filed November 22, 2019. See TEX. R. APP. P. 27.2.

The record in this accelerated appeal appears to be complete. We therefore order 

appellant’s brief due December 30, 2019.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of December, 2019.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-91,563-01

EX PARTE ALFREDO GONZALEZ, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. W13504-1 IN THE 355TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HOOD COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Applicant was convicted of possession with intent to deliver methamphetamine and unlawful

possession of a firearm by a felon and sentenced to imprisonment. The Second Court of Appeals

affirmed his convictions. Gonzalez v. State, No. 02-17-00373-CR (Tex. App.—Fort Worth del. Feb.

28, 2019). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and

the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends that, through no fault of his own, he was denied his right to file a pro se

petition for discretionary review in this Court. See TEX. R. APP. PROC. 68.2. The habeas record

supports Applicant’s claim. Relief is granted. Ex parte Riley, 193 S.W.3d 900 (Tex. Crim. App.

2006); Ex parte Crow, 180 S.W.3d 135 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
2

Applicant may file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review of the judgments of the

Second Court of Appeals in cause number 02-17-00373-CR. Should Applicant decide to file a

petition for discretionary review, he must file it with this Court within thirty daysfromthe date of this

Court’s mandate.

Copies ofthis opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department ofCriminalJustice–Correctional

Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

Delivered: January 13, 2021

Do not publish
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350   In connection with the Quarterly Report of EClips Energy Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Benjamin C. Croxton, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my knowledge that:  (i)  the accompanying Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Act); and  (ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  ECLIPS ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.  /s/ Benjamin C. Croxton BENJAMIN C. CROXTON Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer  November 16, 2009
#### Jose Rodriguez et al., Appellants, v Vincent Piccone et al., Respondents.

[774 NYS2d 185]

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., *758the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Ponterio, J.), dated November 15, 2002, which, upon the granting of the defendants’ motion, in effect, pursuant to CPLR 4401, to dismiss the complaint for failure to establish a prima facie case, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, the motion is denied, the complaint is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Richmond County, for a new trial, with costs to abide the event.

At the commencement of the trial, the Supreme Court granted the defendants’ motion to preclude the plaintiffs from introducing certain hospital records into evidence. Upon the plaintiffs’ concession that they could not prove their prima facie case without those hospital records, the defendants moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to establish a prima facie case, and the Supreme Court granted the motion.

“Hospital records are admissible as business records to the extent that entries therein are germane to the diagnosis and treatment of the patient’s ailments” *(Moran v Demarinis,*152 AD2d 546, 547 [1989]; *see Williams v Alexander,*309 NY 283 [1955]; *Wilson v Bodian,*130 AD2d 221, 229 [1987]; CPLR 4518). Contrary to the Supreme Court’s determination, the statements in the subject medical records were germane to the diagnosis and treatment of the plaintiff Jose Rodriguez and therefore were admissible. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment, reinstate the complaint, and grant a new trial. Smith, J.P., Goldstein, Adams and Townes, JJ., concur.
EX-10.1






Exhibit 10.1




DIRECTOR FEES




On April 27, 2009, the Board of Directors of Bank of Granite Corporation (the “Company”) approved
changes in the Company’s director fees for 2009, as recommended by the Board of Director’s
Compensation Committee and its Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Beginning in April
2009, the Chairman will receive a supplemental annual retainer of $5,000 in addition to the annual
retainer paid to other non-employee directors and $500 per Board meeting attended and presided over
as chairman in addition to the meeting attendance fee paid to non-employee directors. The
Vice-Chairman will continue to receive a supplemental annual retainer of $4,000 in addition to the
annual retainer and meeting fees paid to other non-employee directors.



The fees paid to each non-employee director other than the Chairman and Vice-Chairman remain
unchanged as approved by the Board of Directors on April 17, 2006. Each will receive an annual
retainer in the amount of $10,000 and a meeting fee in the amount of $500 for each Board meeting
attended. Non-employee committee members will continue to receive a meeting fee in the amount of
$250 for each committee meeting attended. Non-employee committee chairpersons will continue to
receive a meeting fee in the amount of $400 for each committee meeting they conduct, which is in
lieu of the $250 committee meeting fee paid to the other non-employee committee members in
attendance.



Annual retainers are prorated and paid quarterly with the meeting fees. Employee directors and
committee members receive no annual retainers or meeting fees.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Deshon Ellis, Appellant.

[774 NYS2d 741]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Juviler, J.), rendered March 1, 1999, convicting him of murder in the second degree and robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress his statements to law enforcement authorities.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s statements were voluntarily made and were not the product of coercion or duress *(see People v Hunter,*265 AD2d 503 [1999]; *People v Dowtin,*244 AD2d 567 [1997]; *People v Padilla,*133 AD2d 353, 354 [1987]). The fact that part of the defendant’s interrogation occurred in a room other than the juvenile interview room *(see*Family Ct Act § 305.2 [4] [b]) does not warrant the suppression of the defendant’s statements, since there was no evidence of “willful or negligent disregard of the statutory requirements [or] evidence of inattention to such *695requirements as a pattern or practice” *(Matter of Emilio M.,*37 NY2d 173, 177 [1975]). Rather, the evidence adduced at the hearing established that another room was chosen on the ground that the juvenile interview room had been sealed off for fumigation to correct lice infestation. The hearing court determined that the interview room which was used was bright, office-like, not oppressive, and did not affect the voluntariness of the defendant’s statement *(see Matter of Luis N.,*112 AD2d 86, 88 [1985]).

Similarly unavailing is the defendant’s claim that the alleged improper remarks made by the prosecutor during summation require reversal. The defendant made only one general objection during the prosecutor’s entire summation *(see People v Hilliard,*279 AD2d 590 [2001]) to a statement which, in any event, constituted fair comment on the evidence.

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are unpreserved for appellate review. Ritter, J.P., Goldstein, Crane and Rivera, JJ., concur.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR


RULE 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Axis Technologies Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kipton Hirschbach, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date June 12 , 2009
By:
/s/ Kipton HirschbachKipton HirschbachChief Executive Officer