Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 234 / Wednesday, December 6, 1995 / Proposed Rules 62369

publication of this document in the

Federal Register that the portion of this

rulemaking proposal concerning

establishment, amendment, or

revocation of tolerances under section

408 be referred to an Advisory

Committee in accordance with section

408(e) of FFDCA.

Interested persons are invited to

submit written comments on the

proposed regulations. Comments must

bear a notation indicating the document

control number, [PP 3F4169 and FAP

35655/P628]. All written comments

filed in response to this petition will be

available in the Public Response and

Program Resources Branch, at the

address given above from 8 a.m. to 4:30

p.m., Monday through Friday, except

legal holidays.

VII. Administrative Matters

Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR

51735, October 4, 1993), the Agency

must determine whether the regulatory

action is ‘‘significant’’ and therefore

subject to all the requirements of the

Executive Order (i.e., Regulatory Impact

Analysis, review by the Office of

Management and Budget (OMB)). Under

section 3(f), the order defines

‘‘significant’’ as those actions likely to

lead to a rule (1) having an annual effect

on the economy of $100 million or

more, or adversely and materially

affecting a sector of the economy,

productivity, competition, jobs, the

environment, public health or safety, or

State, local, or tribal governments or

communities (also known as

‘‘economically significant’’); (2) creating

serious inconsistency or otherwise

interfering with an action taken or

planned by another agency; (3)

materially altering the budgetary

impacts of entitlement, grants, user fees,

or loan programs; or (4) raising novel

legal or policy issues arising out of legal

mandates, the President’s priorities, or

the principles set forth in this Executive

Order.

Pursuant to the terms of this

Executive Order, EPA has determined

that this rule is not ‘‘significant’’ and is

therefore not subject to OMB review.

Pursuant to the requirements of the

Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96-

354, 94 Stat. 1164, 5 U.S.C. 601-612),

the Administrator has determined that

regulations establishing new tolerances

or raising tolerance levels or

establishing exemptions from tolerance

requirements do not have a significant

economic impact on a substantial

number of small entities. A certification

statement to this effect was published in

the Federal Register of May 4, 1981 (46

FR 24950). EPA has treated regulations

simular to the establishment of

tolerances as also not having a

significant economic impact on

substantial number of small entities.

Therefore, the proposed MRL is not

expected to have such impact.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Parts 180 and

186

Environmental protection,

Administrative practice and procedure,

Agricultural commodities, Feed

additives, Pesticides and pests,

Reporting and recordkeeping

requirements.

Dated: November 9, 1995.

Peter Caulkins,

Acting Director, Registration Division, Office

of Pesticide Programs.

Therefore, it is proposed that 40 CFR

parts 180 and 186 be amended as

follows:

PART 180—[AMENDED]

1. In part 180:

a. The authority citation for part 180

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a and 371.

b. In § 180.472, by amending

paragraph (a) by adding and

alphabetically inserting the following

new entries and by removing paragraph

(b) and designating it as reserved, to

read as follows:

§ 180.472 1-[(6-Chloro-3-pyridinyl)methyl]-

N-nitro-2-imidazolidinimine; tolerances for

residues.

(a) * * *

Commodity Parts per

million

* * * * *

Cotton, gin byproducts .............. 4

Cottonseed ................................ 6

* * * * *

(b) [Reserved]

* * * * *

PART 186—[AMENDED]

2. In part 186:

a. By revising the title of part 186 to

read as follows:

Part 186—Pesticides in Animal Feed

b. The authority citation for part 186

is revised to read as follows:

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 342, 348, and 701.

c. In § 186.900, by revising paragraph

(b), to read as follows:

§ 186.900 1-[(6-Chloro-3-pyridinyl)methyl]-

N-nitro-2-imidazolinimine.

* * * * *

(b) A maximum residue level

regulation is established for residues of

the insecticide 1-[(6-choro-3-

pryidinyl)methyl]-N-nitro-2-

imidazolidinimine in or on the

following feed resulting from

application of the insecticide to cotton:

Food Parts per

million

Cottonseed meal ...................... 8

This regulation reflects the maximum

level of residues in cottonseed meal

consistent with use of 1-[(6-chloro-3-

pyridinyl) methyl]-N-nitro-2-

imidazolidinimine on cotton in

conformity with § 180.472 of this

chapter and with the use of good

manufacturing practices.

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 95–29250 Filed 12–5–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–F

FEDERAL EMERGENCY

MANAGEMENT AGENCY

44 CFR Part 67

[Docket No. FEMA–7163]

Proposed Flood Elevation

Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency

Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: Technical information or

comments are requested on the

proposed base (1% annual chance) flood

elevations and proposed base flood

elevation modifications for the

communities listed below. The base

flood elevations and modified base

flood elevations are the basis for the

floodplain management measures that

the community is required either to

adopt or to show evidence of being

already in effect in order to qualify or

remain qualified for participation in the

National Flood Insurance Program

(NFIP).

DATES: The comment period is ninety

(90) days following the second

publication of this proposed rule in a

newspaper of local circulation in each

community.

ADDRESSES: The proposed base flood

elevations for each community are

available for inspection at the office of

the Chief Executive Officer of each

community. The respective addresses

are listed in the following table.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michael K. Buckley, P.E., Chief, Hazard
62370 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 234 / Wednesday, December 6, 1995 / Proposed Rules

Identification Branch, Mitigation

Directorate, 500 C Street, SW,

Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–2756.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

Federal Emergency Management Agency

proposes to make determinations of base

flood elevations and modified base

flood elevations for each community

listed below, in accordance with Section

110 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act

of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4104, and 44 CFR

67.4(a).

These proposed base flood and

modified base flood elevations, together

with the floodplain management criteria

required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the

minimum that are required. They

should not be construed to mean that

the community must change any

existing ordinances that are more

stringent in their floodplain

management requirements. The

community may at any time enact

stricter requirements of its own, or

pursuant to policies established by other

Federal, State, or regional entities.

These proposed elevations are used to

meet the floodplain management

requirements of the NFIP and are also

used to calculate the appropriate flood

insurance premium rates for new

buildings built after these elevations are

made final, and for the contents in these

buildings.

National Environmental Policy Act

This proposed rule is categorically

excluded from the requirements of 44

CFR Part 10, Environmental

Consideration. No environmental

impact assessment has been prepared.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

The Associate Director, Mitigation

Directorate, certifies that this proposed

rule is exempt from the requirements of

the Regulatory Flexibility Act because

proposed or modified base flood

elevations are required by the Flood

Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42

U.S.C. 4104, and are required to

establish and maintain community

eligibility in the NFIP. No regulatory

flexibility analysis has been prepared.

Regulatory Classification

This proposed rule is not a significant

regulatory action under the criteria of

Section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 of

September 30, 1993, Regulatory

Planning and Review, 58 FR 51735.

Executive Order 12612, Federalism

This proposed rule involves no

policies that have federalism

implications under Executive Order

12612, Federalism, dated October 26,

1987.

Executive Order 12778, Civil Justice

Reform

This proposed rule meets the

applicable standards of Section 2(b)(2)

of Executive Order 12778.

List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 67

Administrative practice and

procedure, Flood insurance, Reporting

and recordkeeping requirements.

Accordingly, 44 CFR Part 67 is

proposed to be amended as follows:

PART 67—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for Part 67

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.;

Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1978, 3 CFR,

1978 Comp., p. 329; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367,

3 CFR, 1979 Comp., p. 376.

§ 67.4 [Amended]

2. The tables published under the

authority of § 67.4 are proposed to be

amended as follows:

State City/town/county Source of flooding Location

#Depth in feet above

ground. *Elevation in

feet.

(NGVD)

Existing Modified

Arizona ........................ Flagstaff (City),

Coconino County.

Clay Avenue Wash .... At Milton Road ............................................... *6,895 *6,894

Approximately 450 feet upstream of Malpais

Lane.

*6,897 *6,899

Approximately 80 feet upstream of Blackbird

Forest Street.

*6,900 *6,901

At Chateau Drive ........................................... *6,905 *6,905

Approximately 980 feet upstream of Chateau

Drive.

*6,929 *6,930

Approximately 1,300 feet upstream of Chateau Drive.*6,931 *6,931

Maps are available for inspection at the City of Flagstaff, City Hall, 211 West Aspen Avenue, Flagstaff, Arizona.

Send comments to The Honorable Christopher J. Bavasi, Mayor, City of Flagstaff, 211 West Aspen Avenue, Flagstaff, Arizona 86001.

Idaho ........................... Ada County, (Unincorporated Areas).Cottonwood Gulch ..... Approximately 7,615 feet above Garrison

Road at the City of Boise corporate limits.

None *2,896

Approximately 9,100 feet above Garrison

Road.

None *2,930

Approximately 100 feet upstream of Shaw

Mountain Road.

None *2,953

Approximately 1,280 feet above Shaw Mountain Road.None *2,980

Approximately 2,280 feet above Shaw Mountain Road.None *3,010

Stuart Gulch ............... Approximately 2,000 feet downstream of

Cartwright Road at the City of Boise corporate limits.

None *2,796

Approximately 1,360 feet downstream of

Cartwright Road.

None *2,840

Approximately 500 feet downstream of Cartwright Road.None *2,861
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 234 / Wednesday, December 6, 1995 / Proposed Rules 62371

State City/town/county Source of flooding Location

#Depth in feet above

ground. *Elevation in

feet.

(NGVD)

Existing Modified

Hulls Gulch ................ Approximately 700 feet downstream of

McCord Lane at the City of Boise corporate limits.

None *2,864

At McCord Lane ............................................. None *2,903

Approximately 2,300 feet upstream of

McCord Lane.

None *2,971

Maps are available for inspection at the Ada County Development Services Office, 650 Main Street, Boise, Idaho.

Send comments to The Honorable Vern Bisterfeldt, Chairman, Ada County Board of Commissioners, 650 Main Street, Boise, Idaho 83702.

Idaho ........................... Boise (City), Ada

County.

Stuart Gulch ............... Approximately 100 feet upstream of Stuart

Gulch Road.

None *2,692

Approximately 3,000 feet upstream of Stuart

Gulch Road at an unnamed road.

None *2,745

Approximately 4,600 feet upstream of Stuart

Gulch Road at an unnamed road.

None *2,785

Approximately 5,000 feet upstream of Stuart

Gulch Road.

*2,800 *2,795

Approximately 6,910 feet upstream of Stuart

Gulch Road at the City of Boise corporate

limits.

None *2,825

Stuart Gulch Split

Flow Channel.

At the convergence with Stuart Gulch, approximately 2,350 feet upstream of Stuart

Gulch Road.

None *2,725

Approximately 2,200 feet upstream of the

convergence with Stuart Gulch at an

unnamed road.

None *2,775

At the divergence from Stuart Gulch ............. None *2,800

Crane Gulch .............. At Hill Road .................................................... None *2,732

.................................... Just upstream of Parkhill Drive ...................... None *2,750

Just upstream of Cottonwood Court .............. None *2,773

Just upstream of Ranch Road ....................... None *2,795

Just downstream of Curling Drive ................. None *2,865

Hulls Gulch ................ Just upstream of the intersection of 9th

Street and Heron Street.

None *2,735

Approximately 1,400 feet downstream of

Mile High Road at 9th Street.

None *2,761

Approximately 1,000 feet upstream of Mile

High Road.

None *2,826

Approximately 2,300 feet upstream of Mile

High Road at the City of Boise corporate

limits.

None *2,864

Cottonwood Gulch ..... Approximately 1,100 feet upstream of Garrison Road.None *2,748

At confluence with Freestone Creek ............. None *2,793

Approximately 4,300 feet upstream of confluence with Freestone Creek at the City

of Boise corporate limits.

None *2,878

Approximately 5,085 feet upstream of confluence with Freestone Creek at the City

of Boise corporate limits.

None *2,898

Maps are available for inspection at the Office of Community Planning and Development, City Hall, 150 North Capitol Boulevard, Boise,

Idaho.

Send comments to The Honorable Brent H. Coles, Mayor, City of Boise, City Hall, P.O. Box 500, Boise, Idaho 83701–0500.

Texas .......................... Uvalde (City), Uvalde

County.

Cooks Slough ............ Approximately 500 feet downstream of West

Main Street.

*900 *899

Just downstream of Fort Clark Street ............ *903 *901

Approximately 4,300 feet downstream of

Benson Road.

*911 *908

Approximately 300 feet downstream of Benson Road.*915 *917
62372 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 234 / Wednesday, December 6, 1995 / Proposed Rules

State City/town/county Source of flooding Location

#Depth in feet above

ground. *Elevation in

feet.

(NGVD)

Existing Modified

Maps are available for inspection at Uvalde City Hall, Highway 90, Uvalde, Texas.

Send comments to The Honorable George Horner, Mayor, City of Uvalde, P.O. Box 799, Uvalde, Texas 78801.

Texas .......................... Uvalde County, (Unincorporated Areas).Cooks Slough ............ Approximately 1,100 feet upstream of U.S.

Highway 83 (or 100 feet upstream of

South Grove Street).

*891 *893

Just downstream of the grade control structure.*906 *904

Approximately 2,470 feet upstream of Benson Road (FM 1052).*918 *920

Maps are available for inspection at the County Judge’s Office, Uvalde County Courthouse, Courthouse Square, Corner of Main and Getty

Streets, Uvalde, Texas.

Send comments to The Honorable William R. Mitchell, County Judge, Uvalde County Courthouse, Uvalde, Texas 78801.

Washington ................. Ferry County, (Unincorporated Areas).Kettle RiverReach 7 .. Approximately 73.96 miles upstream of confluence with the Columbia River.None *1,806

Approximately 74.66 miles upstream of confluence with the Columbia River.None *1,810

Approximately 75.17 miles upstream of confluence with the Columbia River.*1,813 *1,812

Approximately 75.52 miles upstream of confluence with the Columbia River.*1,814 *1,814

Approximately 75.84 miles upstream of confluence with the Columbia River.*1,816 *1,815

Kettle RiverReach 1

(Near Barstow).

Approximately 9.87 miles upstream of confluence with the Columbia River.None *1,306

Approximately 10.36 miles upstream of confluence with the Columbia River.None *1,309

Approximately 10.85 miles upstream of confluence with the Columbia River.None *1,312

Kettle RiverReach 2

(Near Orient).

Approximately 18.62 miles upstream of confluence with the Columbia River.None *1,389

Approximately 18.77 miles upstream of confluence with the Columbia River.None *1,390

Approximately 19.17 miles upstream of confluence with the Columbia River.None *1,391

Kettle RiverReach 3

(Near Laurier).

Approximately 27.24 miles upstream of confluence with the Columbia River.None *1,435

Approximately 27.53 miles upstream of confluence with the Columbia River.None *1,438

Approximately 28.00 miles upstream of confluence with the Columbia River.None *1,441

Approximately 28.27 miles upstream of confluence with the Columbia River.None *1,443

Kettle RiverReach 4

(Near Danville).

Approximately 58.0 miles upstream of confluence with the Columbia River.None *1,732

Approximately 58.43 miles upstream of confluence with the Columbia River.None *1,733

Kettle RiverReach 5

(Near Curlew).

Approximately 64.87 miles upstream of confluence with the Columbia River.None *1,764

Approximately 65.17 miles upstream of confluence with the Columbia River.None *1,765

Approximately 65.45 miles upstream of confluence with the Columbia River.None *1,766

Kettle RiverReach 8

(Near Ferry).

Approximately 84.78 miles upstream of confluence with the Columbia River.None *1,864

Approximately 85.15 miles upstream of confluence with the Columbia River.None *1,866

Approximately 85.78 miles upstream of confluence with the Columbia River.None *1,868

Maps are available for inspection at the Ferry County Planning Department, 146 North Clark, Suite 7, Republic, Washington.

Send comments to The Honorable Ed F. Windson, Chairperson, Ferry County Commissioners, County Courthouse, 350 East Delaware, Republic, Washington 99166.

Washington Stevens County, (Unincorporated Areas).Kettle RiverReach 1

(Near Barstow).

Approximately 9.87 miles upstream of confluence with the Columbia River.None *1,306
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 234 / Wednesday, December 6, 1995 / Proposed Rules 62373

State City/town/county Source of flooding Location

#Depth in feet above

ground. *Elevation in

feet.

(NGVD)

Existing Modified

Approximately 10.5 miles upstream of confluence with the Columbia River.None *1,310

Approximately 10.86 miles upstream of confluence with the Columbia River.None *1,312

Kettle RiverReach 2

(Near Orient).

Approximately 18.62 miles upstream of confluence with the Columbia River.None *1,389

Approximately 19.17 miles upstream of confluence with the Columbia River.None *1,392

Kettle RiverReach 3

(Near Laurier).

Approximately 27.24 miles upstream of confluence with the Columbia River.None *1,435

Approximately 27.8 miles upstream of confluence with the Columbia River.None *1,440

Approximately 28.26 miles upstream of confluence with the Columbia River.None *1,443

Maps are available for inspection at the Stevens County Planning Department, 260 South Oak Street, Colville, Washington.

Send comments to The Honorable Alan L. Mack, Chairperson, Stevens County Commissioners, County Courthouse, 215 South Oak Street,

Colville, Washington 99114.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No.

83.100, ‘‘Flood Insurance.’’)

Dated: November 29, 1995.

Richard T. Moore,

Associate Director for Mitigation.

[FR Doc. 95–29706 Filed 12–5–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6718–04–P

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 95–173; RM–8725]

Radio Broadcasting Services; Calhoun

City, MS

AGENCY: Federal Communications

Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: The Commission requests

comments on a petition by WKZU

Radio, licensee of Station WKZU(FM),

Channel 272A, Ripley, Mississippi,

proposing the deletion of vacant

Channel 272A at Calhoun City,

Mississippi. Any party wishing to

express an interest in Channel 272A at

Calhoun City, Mississippi, should file

their expression of interest by the initial

comment deadline specified herein.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or

before January 22, 1996, and reply

comments on or before February 6,

1996.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications

Commission, Washington, DC 20554. In

addition to filing comments with the

FCC, interested parties should serve the

petitioner, or its counsel or consultant,

as follows: Harry Holliday, WKZU

Radio, P.O. Box 572, Ripley, Mississippi

38663 (petitioner).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam

Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, (202)

418–2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a

synopsis of the Commission’s Notice of

Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No.

95–173, adopted November 8, 1995, and

released November 30, 1995. The full

text of this Commission decision is

available for inspection and copying

during normal business hours in the

FCC’s Reference Center (Room 239),

1919 M Street, NW., Washington, DC.

The complete text of this decision may

also be purchased from the

Commission’s copy contractor, ITS, Inc.,

(202) 857–3800, 2100 M Street, NW.,

Suite 140, Washington, DC 20037.

Provisions of the Regulatory

Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to

this proceeding.

Members of the public should note

that from the time a Notice of Proposed

Rule Making is issued until the matter

is no longer subject to Commission

consideration or court review, all ex

parte contacts are prohibited in

Commission proceedings, such as this

one, which involve channel allotments.

See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules

governing permissible ex parte contacts.

For information regarding proper

filing procedures for comments, see 47

CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.

John A. Karousos,

Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules

Division, Mass Media Bureau.

[FR Doc. 95–29656 Filed 12–5–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712–01–F

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric

Administration

50 CFR Parts 611, 675, 676, and 677

[Docket No. 95112820–5280–01; I.D.

111495A]

Groundfish Fishery of the Bering Sea

and Aleutian Islands; Limited Access;

Foreign Fishing; Proposed 1996 Initial

Harvest Specifications

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),

Commerce.

ACTION: Proposed 1996 initial

specifications for groundfish and

associated management measures;

request for comments.

SUMMARY: NMFS proposes 1996 initial

harvest specifications, prohibited

species bycatch allowances, and

associated measures for the groundfish

fishery of the Bering Sea and Aleutian

Islands management area (BSAI). This

action is necessary to inform the public

about proposed 1996 harvest

specifications and associated

management measures. The intended

effect is to conserve and manage the

groundfish resources in the BSAI and to