Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 238 / Tuesday, December 12, 1995 / Rules and Regulations 63613

The market administrator, in his

capacity as the order’s liquidating agent,

has completed the disbursement of all of

the money remaining in the

administrative, producer-settlement,

and marketing service funds established

under the order. Hence, the remaining

provisions of the order should be

terminated.

Therefore, the aforesaid provisions of

§ 1099.1 of the order are hereby

terminated.

For good cause shown, this rule shall

be effective December 22, 1995. Neither

a comment period nor a 30-day effective

date is provided in that all other

provisions of the order were terminated

effective November 1, 1995, and no

parties are affected by this action.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1099

Milk marketing orders.

PART 1099—MILK IN THE PADUCAH,

KENTUCKY MARKETING AREA

[REMOVED]

For the reasons set forth in the

preamble and under the authority 7

U.S.C. 601–674, 7 CFR part 1099 is

removed

Dated: December 4, 1995.

Shirley R. Watkins,

Acting Assistant Secretary, Marketing and

Regulatory Programs.

[FR Doc. 95–30095 Filed 12–11–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410–02–P

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION

ADMINISTRATION

12 CFR Part 701

Technical Amendments; Organization

and Operation of Federal Credit

Unions; Correction

AGENCY: National Credit Union

Administration (NCUA).

ACTION: Correction to final regulation.

SUMMARY: This document corrects an

inadvertent error in an amendatory

instruction to the final regulations

which were published Tuesday,

November 28, 1995 (60 FR 58502). The

regulations consolidated all current

regulations and requirements that apply

to federally insured state-chartered

credit unions in one place, the

regulations on requirements for

insurance. The error occurred in one of

the conforming technical amendments.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 29, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Hattie M. Ulan, Special Counsel to the

General Counsel, 1775 Duke Street,

Alexandria, VA 22314, or telephone

(703) 518–6544.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the

Federal Register published on

November 28, 1995, there was an

inadvertent error in an amendatory

instruction to the final regulation. The

final regulations concern requirements

for insurance. However, the error was

contained in the instruction for a

technical amendment to § 701.21—

Loans to members and lines of credit to

members. This correction is being made

in order to ensure that the final

regulation is published correctly in the

Code of Federal Regulations.

Correction of Publication

Accordingly, the publication on

November 28, 1995 of the final

regulations which were the subject of

FR Doc. 95–28703, is corrected as

follows:

§ 701.21 [Corrected]

On page 58504, column one, the

second line of amendatory instruction

3., the word ‘‘fourth’’ is corrected to

read ‘‘fifth’’.

Becky Baker,

Secretary, NCUA Board.

[FR Doc. 95–30178 Filed 12–11–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7535–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 95–NM–236–AD; Amendment

39–9457; AD 95–25–11]

Airworthiness Directives; Empresa

Brasileira de Aeronautica, S.A.

(EMBRAER) Model EMB–120 Series

Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; Request for

comments.

SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a

new airworthiness directive (AD) that is

applicable to all EMBRAER Model

EMB–120 series airplanes. This action

requires revising the FAA-approved

Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) to limit

the revolutions per minute (RPM) of the

propeller during ground operation, and

removing and installing a new placard.

This AD also requires revising the FAAapproved maintenance program to limit

the maximum RPM of the propeller

during ground operations. This

amendment is prompted by reports of

failures of in-service propellers and

subsequent testing, which revealed that

operating the propeller at or near certain

nominal propeller RPM produces high

vibration stress. The actions specified in

this AD are intended to limit exposure

to high vibration stresses during ground

operations under certain weather

conditions; this situation could

accelerate fatigue cracking if corrosion

is present in the propeller, which could

lead to the failure of the propeller and

subsequent reduced controllability of

the airplane.

DATES: Effective December 27, 1995.

Comments for inclusion in the Rules

Docket must be received on or before

February 12, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments in

triplicate to the Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), Transport

Airplane Directorate, ANM–103,

Attention: Rules Docket No. 95–NM–

236–AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,

Renton, Washington 98055–4056.

Information concerning this

amendment may be obtained from or

examined at the FAA, Transport

Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind

Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at

the FAA, Atlanta Aircraft Certification

Office, Small Airplane Directorate,

Campus Building, 1701 Columbia

Avenue, Suite 2–160, College Park,

Georgia.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Carla J.W. Worthey, Aerospace

Engineer, Flight Test Branch, ACE–

116A, FAA, Atlanta Aircraft

Certification Office, Small Airplane

Directorate, Campus Building, 1701

Columbia Avenue, Suite 2–160, College

Park, Georgia 30337–2748; telephone

(404) 305–7364; fax (404) 305–7348.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA

has received reports of failures of inservice Hamilton Standard 14RF, 14SF,

and 6/5500/F series propellers. Result of

inspections have revealed internal

corrosion in the taper bore and external

damage to the shank section on these

propellers. Such internal corrosion or

external damage reduces the design

allowable stress levels of the propeller

material. Further inspections revealed

that the corrosion and damage is evenly

distributed amongst the subject

propellers. However, fracturing has

occurred predominately on the

Hamilton Standard 14RF series

propellers installed on EMBRAER

Model EMB–120 series airplanes. This

disparity has prompted an investigation

into operational differences between the

airplanes utilizing these propellers.

A vibration/loads survey and analysis

was conducted by Hamilton Standard

on the Hamilton Standard 14RF series

propellers installed on EMBRAER

Model EMB–120 series airplanes. The

survey and analysis results verified that

high vibration stresses could occur on