alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### DAVID LANGLEY v. GEORGE TAYLOR, Chairman, and TOMMIE SPARROW and J. L. LANCASTER, Members Comprising THE BEAUFORT COUNTY ABC BOARD on June 15, 1951.

(Filed 2 March, 1955.)

Appeal and Error § 2—

An order overruling a demurrer *ore tenus*is not appealable.

Appeal by defendants from *Nimocks, J.,*October Term, 1954, of Beaueoet.

Civil action to recover damages for tbe alleged negligent failure of tbe defendants to require William A. Patrick, an ABC enforcement officer, to give bond as prescribed by G.S. 128-9. Tbe plaintiff herein instituted an action against Patrick, *et al.,*in 1952, which case was disposed of at tbe Fall Term, 1953, of tbis Court. See *Langley v. Patrick,*238 N.C. 250, 77 S.E. 2d 656.

In tbe instant case tbe defendants demurred *ore tenus*to tbe plaintiff’s complaint. Tbe court below overruled tbe demurrer and tbe defendants appeal, assigning error.

*LeBoy Scott and John A. Wilkinson for plaintiff.*

*Bodman & Bodman for defendants.*

Per Curiam.

An order overruling.a demurrer *ore tenus*is not appeal-able. *Morgan v. Oil Co.,*236 N.C. 615, 73 S.E. 2d 477. Hence, tbis *574appeal will be dismissed on authority of the above decision and the cases cited therein.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
      THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      Steven
      Goertz, Chief Executive Officer of Getpokerrakeback.com , certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Getpokerrakeback.com
      , for
      the fiscal year ended August 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements
      of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
      information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in
      all
      material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
      Getpokerrakeback.com.


Date:
                  October 25,
                  2007
              By:
              /s/ Steven
                GoertzChief
                  Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice of intent.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with 37 CFR 404.7(a)(1)(i), announcement is made of a prospective exclusive license of the following U.S. Patent Application 12/243,084 Filed October 1, 2008.

# DATES:

Written objections must be filed not later than 15 days following publication of this announcement.

# ADDRESSES:

United States Army Engineer Research and Development Center, ATTN: CEERD-ZA-T (Ms. Bea Shahin), 2902 Newmark Drive, Champaign, IL 6182-1076.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. Bea Shahin (217) 373-7234, FAX (217) 373-7210, e-mail:                         *Bea.S.Shahin@usace.army.mil.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This patent application claims a method by which a biologically natural material can be produced in bioreactors and transformed for use as a dry solid. The resulting biopolymer material can be used in place of synthetic, petroleum-based polymers for soil amendment applications to achieve increased soil strength, reduced air transport, and decreased soil erosion. During processing, the biopolymer also can be functionalized to improve its adsorption of heavy metals.

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2010-13668 Filed 6-7-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3720-58-P
EXHIBIT A

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4706-1 Filed: 11/13/19 Entered: 11/13/19 13:41:32 Page 1

of 3
BERMAN AND TODDERUD LLP

701 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 4200

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104

Eric Todderud

Direct Dial (206) 262-7682

eric@btlawllp.com

November 13, 2019

Via E-Mail: john.simon@pge-corp.com

John R. Simon

Executive Vice President and General Counsel

PG&E Corporation

77 Beale Street

P.O. Box 770000

San Francisco, CA 94177

Via E-Mail: j1lc@pge.com

Janet Loduca

Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel

Pacific Gas and Electric Company

77 Beale Street

P.O. Box 770000

San Francisco, CA 94177

Re: In re PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company

Dear Mr. Simon and Ms. Loduca:

Pursuant to the Guidelines for Compensation and Expense Reimbursement of 

Professionals and Trustees of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of 

California and the United States Trustee’s Guidelines, I am sending a copy of the Second Interim 

Fee Application of Berman and Todderud LLP for Allowance and Payment of Compensation for 

your review (“Second Interim Application”). The United States Trustee’s Guidelines require the 

Debtors to exercise reasonable business judgment in monitoring the fees and expenses of the 

estate’s professionals. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4706-1 Filed: 11/13/19 Entered: 11/13/19 13:41:32 Page 2

of 3
John R. Simon

Janet Loduca

November 13, 2019

Page 2

Please notify me if you have questions or objections regarding the Second Interim 

Application. If you have no objections, I request that you acknowledge that you have reviewed 

the Second Interim Application and do not object to it. 

Thank you for your assistance. 

Very truly yours,

/s/ Eric Todderud

Eric Todderud

Attachment

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4706-1 Filed: 11/13/19 Entered: 11/13/19 13:41:32 Page 3

of 3
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to

to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of SAVVIS, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



|(a) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |     |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 1, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Philip J. Koen     
|                       |  |     |  | Philip J. Koen         
|                       |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
#### STATE v. W. B. WALTERS, JR.

(Filed 26 June, 1935.)

Constitutional Law F d — Defendant pleading not guilty may not waive constitutional right to jury trial without changing his plea.

Defendant was convicted of a misdemeanor in the mayor’s court upon his plea of not guilty. Upon appeal to the Superior Court the case was submitted upon an agreed statement of facts, and the court adjudged the defendant guilty. *Held,:*Defendant, without changing his plea, could not waive his constitutional right to a jury trial, and there was error in the judgment.

Appeal by defendant from *Harris, J.,*at March Term, 1935, of ORANGE.

Error.

This is a criminal action in which the defendant is charged with the commission of a misdemeanor, to wit, the violation of an ordinance of the town of Hillsboro, N. O. C. S., 4174.

The action was begun by a criminal warrant issued by the mayor of the town of Hillsboro, and was tried in the mayor’s court of said town, on defendant’s plea of not guilty. The defendant was convicted, and appealed from the judgment at said trial to the Superior Court of Orange County.

*392After the action was docketed in the Superior Court of Orange County, and while it was pending in said court for trial, *de novo,*the attorney for the town of Hillsboro and the attorney for the defendant submitted to the judge of said court an agreed statement of facts, and agreed that said judge should consider said facts agreed, and render judgment thereon, expressly waiving a trial by jury.

The judge was of opinion that on the facts agreed the defendant is guilty, and thereupon adjudged that defendant pay a fine of $1.00 and the costs of the action.

The defendant excepted to the judgment and appealed to the Supreme Court.

*Attorney-General Seawell and Assistant Attorney-General Ailcen for the State.*

*Gilbert B. Swindell and J ones & Brassfield for defendant.*

Pee Oueiam.

In *S. v. Straughn,*197 N. C., 691, 150 S. E., 330, it is said: “It has been held in a number of cases that where a defendant in a criminal prosecution, on trial in the Superior Court, enters a plea of not guilty to the charge preferred against him, he may not thereafter, without changing his plea, waive his constitutional right of trial by jury. *S. v. Hartsfield,*188 N. C., 357, 124 S. E., 629. And this applies to misdemeanors as well as to more serious offenses. *S. v. Pulliam,*184 N. C., 681, 114 S. E., 394.”

A judgment against a defendant in a criminal action who has entered a plea of not guilty of the crime with which he is charged, and who has not withdrawn said plea, is erroneous when there was no verdict, either general or special, to support the judgment. *S. v. Beasley,*196 N. C., 797, 147 S. E., 301.

It is ordered that this action be remanded to the Superior Court of Orange County for trial in said court, as provided by law. *S. v. Pulliam, supra.*

Error.
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350   In connection with the Quarterly Report of EClips Energy Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Benjamin C. Croxton, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my knowledge that:  (i)  the accompanying Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Act); and  (ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  ECLIPS ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.  /s/ Benjamin C. Croxton BENJAMIN C. CROXTON Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer  May 15, 2009
EXHIBIT 10.3

                                  AMENDMENT TO

                        SAVVIS COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
                             1999 STOCK OPTION PLAN

         The SAVVIS Communications Corporation 1999 Stock Option Plan (the
"Plan") is hereby amended as set forth below, effective as of the date of
adoption (the "Adoption Date") of this amendment (the "Amendment") by the Board
of Directors of SAVVIS Communications Corporation (the "Corporation"), subject
to approval of this Amendment by the stockholders of the Corporation, as
provided below:

1.       The first sentence of Section 2(a) is hereby amended and restated in
         its entirety to read as follows:

         "SECTION 2. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SHARES.

                  (a) The maximum number of shares of Stock which may be issued
         pursuant to Options under the Plan, and the maximum number of shares
         for which ISOs may be granted under the Plan, shall be 46,000,000
         shares; provided, however, that the maximum number of shares of Stock
         which may be issued to an individual during any calendar year pursuant
         to Options under the Plan is 10,000,000 shares. Both of these share
         limits are subject to adjustment as provided in Section 8."

2.       The definition of "Fair Market Value" in Section 13(j) is hereby
         amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:

         "Fair Market Value" shall be the value of the Stock as determined by
         the Committee in good faith.

3.       The Plan shall be unchanged in all other respects.

4.       This Amendment is adopted subject to approval within one year of the
         Adoption Date by the stockholders of the Corporation. If the
         stockholders fail to approve this Amendment within one year of the
         Adoption Date, no awards may be granted under the Plan covering shares
         of stock in excess of the number permitted under the Plan as in effect
         before the Adoption Date.

                                      * * *



<PAGE>


         The foregoing Amendment to the Plan was duly adopted and approved by
the Board of Directors of the Corporation on February 26, 2002, subject to
approval of the Amendment by stockholders of the Corporation.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Derycz Scientific, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter Derycz, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and





(2)
            The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the
Company.





/s/ Peter DeryczPeter
      DeryczChief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)September
      28, 2010
Summary of Loan Agreement
Entered into by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. (“the Company”) and
Shenzhen Eastern Branch, Agricultural Bank of China (“the Creditor”) dated June
26, 2009

    


    Main
contents

    
      	
              Ø

            	
              Contract
      number: 81101200900001450;

            


    

    
      	
              Ø

            	
              Loan
      principal:
HKD 23.46452199 million;

            


    

    
      	
              Ø

            	
              Loan
      term: from June 26, 2009 to June 25,
2010;

            


    

    
      	
              Ø

            	
              Interest
      rate: fixed at 0.34786%;

            


    

    
      	
               
      

            	
              n

            	
              Penalty
      interest rate for delayed repayment: 0.34786% plus 30%
      *0.34786%;

            


    

    
      	
               
      

            	
              n

            	
              Penalty
      interest rate for embezzlement of loan proceeds: 0.34786% plus 50%
      *0.34786%;

            


    

    


    
      	
              Ø

            	
              Purpose
      of the loan is to provide import payments of the
  Company;

            


    

    
      	
              Ø

            	
              Advanced
      repayment of loan needs to be approved by the
    Creditor;

            


    

    
      	
              Ø

            	
              Breach
      of contract penalties: correct the breach of contract in time limit;
      suspension of loan unprovided; release loan agreement, demand
      prepayment of loan principal and interest before maturity; imposition
      of punitive interest incurred due to delayed loan; imposition of punitive
      interest for embezzlement of loan; imposition of plural interest for
      unpaid interest; withdraw from any accounts of the Company the loan
      principal, interest and other fees; compensation for the Creditor’s
      expenses incurred due to demanding the loan principal and interest in case
      of litigation, etc.

            


    

    


    Headlines
of the articles omitted:

    Ø    Loan
arrangement

    Ø    Interest
clearing of the loan

    Ø    Payment
of the loan

    Ø    Interest
penalty of loan

    Ø    Rights
and obligation of the Company

    Ø    Rights
and obligations of the Creditor

    Ø    Guarantee
of the loan agreement

    
      	
              Ø

            	
              Disputation
      settlement

            


    

    
      	
              Ø

            	
              Supplemental

            


    

    Ø    Validity

    Ø    Text

    
      	
              Ø

            	
              Notification
**Exhibit 99.3**

 

**Rule 13a-14(a) 15(d)-14(a) Certification**

**By Chief Financial Officer**

 

I Bob Hogarth, certify that:

 

1.      Ihave reviewed this Form 10-K of Siga Resources, Inc. (the “small business issuer”);

 

Date: November 22, 2013

 

BOB HOGARTH                                 

Bob Hogarth

Chief Financial Officer, Secretary Treasurer and Director
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-1196

_____________________________

DAMIEN B. FORD,

Appellant,

v.

FLORIDA HOSPITAL EAST 

ORLANDO,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Florida Commission on Human Relations.

May 28, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Marchman v. St. Anthony’s Hosp., Inc., 152 So. 

3d 830, 831 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (holding that the Florida 

Commission on Human Relations lacked jurisdiction over 

hospitals); Crane v. Lifemark Hosp. of Fla., Inc., 149 So. 3d 718, 

721 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) (concluding that a hospital was not a 

covered establishment under the Florida Civil Rights Act). See also 

Mena v. Lifemark Hosps. of Fla., Inc., Final Order No. 12-023, 2012 

Fla. Div. Adm. Hear. LEXIS 253, *4 (FCHR May 16, 2012) (a 

hospital cafeteria cannot turn a hospital into a place of public 

accommodation), aff’d, Mena v. Lifemark Hosps. of Fla., Inc., 109 

So. 3d 787 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).

ROWE, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Richard S. Larson of Rick Larson Law, Winter Garden, for 

Appellant.

Craig S. Foels, Christian P. Trowbridge, and Dinelia Concepcion of 

Estes, Ingram, Foels & Gibbs, P.A., Maitland, for Appellee.
Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18
                           OF THE UNITED STATES CODE,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of World Energy  Solutions,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Benjamin C. Croxton,  Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: November 13, 2006


/s/ Benjamin C. Croxton
---------------------------------
BENJAMIN C. CROXTON
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31

                                                          [LOGO] IndymacBank(R)

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Blair Abernathy, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
      required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
      Form 10-K of IndyMac INDX Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-AR1 (the "Exchange Act
      periodic reports");

2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
      whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
      state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
      the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
      information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered
      by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in
      this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in
      the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its
      obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance-with servicing criteria for
      asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
      assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
      securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item
      1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been
      included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in
      this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
      reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank National
Trust Company and Newport Management Corporation.

Date: March 26, 2008



/s/ Blair Abernathy
-----------------------
Blair Abernathy
Executive Vice President
(Senior Officer in Charge of Securitization of the Depositor)