alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5578 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the exclusion for 

employer-provided educational assistance to employer payment of interest 

on certain refinanced student loans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 

Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the exclusion for employer-provided educational assistance to employer payment of interest on certain refinanced student loans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Employer Participation 

5 in Refinancing Act’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5578 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FOR EMPLOYER PAYMENT OF INTER2 EST ON CERTAIN REFINANCED STUDENT 

3 LOANS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 127(c) 

5 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by strik6 ing ‘‘and’’ at the end of subparagraph (A), by redesig7 nating subparagraph (B) as subparagraph (C), and by in8 serting after subparagraph (A) the following new subpara9 graph: 

10 ‘‘(B) the payment by an employer, whether 

11 paid to the employee or to a lender, of any in12 debtedness of the employee under a qualified 

13 education refinance loan or any interest relating 

14 to such a loan, and’’. 

15 (b) QUALIFIED EDUCATION REFINANCE LOAN.— 

16 Subsection (c) of section 127 of the Internal Revenue Code 

17 of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following 

18 new paragraph: 

19 ‘‘(8) QUALIFIED EDUCATION REFINANCE

20 LOAN.—The term ‘qualified education refinance 

21 loan’ means any indebtedness used solely to refi22 nance a qualified education loan (within the meaning 

23 of section 221(d)(1)) with respect to which the lend24 er offers the borrower protection in the event of un25 employment or financial hardship (as reasonably deVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:03 Sep 29, 2014 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5578.IH H5578

tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5578 IH

1 termined by the lender, including periods of forbear2 ance or career assistance).’’. 

3 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT; DENIAL OF DOUBLE

4 BENEFIT.—Paragraph (1) of section 221(e) of the Inter5 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting before 

6 the period the following: ‘‘, or for which an exclusion is 

7 allowable under section 127 to the taxpayer’s employer by 

8 reason of the payment by such employer of any indebted9 ness on a qualified education loan of the taxpayer’’. 

10 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

11 this section shall apply to expenses paid after December 

12 31, 2014. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Jacob Kalinsky, Appellant, v. The Albany Railway, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion.

Herrick, J., not acting.
Exhibit 34.1.5.6

 

[Letterhead of ERNST & YOUNG LLP]

 

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

To the Board of Directors:

 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that ZC Real Estate Tax Solutions Limited  (‘the Company’ or ‘ZCRETS’ ) complied with certain servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the ZC Tax Source (ZCTS) Real Estate Tax Outsourcing Platform (the Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007. The Company has determined that only certain servicing criteria Item 1122 (d)(1)(iv), Item 1122 (d)(2)(vi), Item 1122 (d)(4)(xi), Item 1122 (d)(4)(xii), and Item 1122 (d)4(xiii) are applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the Platform covered by this report. The Company has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) ofthe Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the Platform covered by this report. See Appendix A of management’s assertion for the Platform and Servicers covered by this report. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our teststhat may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the Platform. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

February 14, 2008
#### L. M. GERRINGER v. WALTER GERRINGER and MRS. LENA BARBER.

(Filed 31 January, 1946.)

Deeds § 16c—

In tliis action to recover for breach, of contract to maintain ancl support plaintiff as consideration for the execution of a deed, the evidence considered in the light most favorable for plaintiff *is held,*sufficient to carry the case to the jury.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Johnson, Special Judge,*at April Term, 1945, of AlamaNce.

This was an action to recover for breach of contract to maintain and support the plaintiff as consideration for the execution of a deed. At the close of the evidence judgment of nonsuit was entered, and plaintiff excepted and appealed.

*Thos. C. Carter and A. M. Carroll for plaintiff, appellant.*

*P. W. Glidewell, Sr., and Thomas D. Cooper for defendants, appellees.*

Devin, J.

The parties here are the same as those in *Gerringer v. Gerringer,*223 N. C., 818, 28 S. E. (2d), 501. In the former suit the plaintiff sought to set aside the deed which he had executed to the defendants in consideration of their promise to maintain and support him during his natural life. That suit was based upon allegations of fraud and undue influence, and judgment of nonsuit was affirmed on appeal. In the opinion by *Justice Denny*it was said: “Plaintiff’s remedy, if any, appears to be, not in equity, but in a court of law for breach of contract.” Thereafter plaintiff instituted this action for breach of the contract, alleging that defendants had failed to maintain and support him as they had promised to do. In the hearing below judgment of nonsuit was entered and plaintiff appealed.

After examining the record and considering the evidence in the light most favorable for the plaintiff, we reach the conclusion that he has offered sufficient evidence to carry his case to the jury, and that there was error in sustaining the motion for judgment of nonsuit.

As the case goes back for trial, we do not discuss the evidence or express any opinion as to its weight or credibility.

The judgment of nonsuit is

Reversed.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 32468]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13605]



=======================================================================

-----------------------------------------------------------------------



FARM CREDIT SYSTEM INSURANCE CORPORATION




Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation Board; Regular Meeting



AGENCY: Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation.



SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the regular meeting of the Farm 

Credit System Insurance Corporation Board (Board).



DATES: The meeting of the Board will be held at the offices of the Farm 

Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on June 10, 2010, from 1 

p.m. until such time as the Board concludes its business.



FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roland E. Smith, Secretary to the Farm 

Credit System Insurance Corporation Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 

883-4056.



ADDRESSES: Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation, 1501 Farm Credit 

Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102.



SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Parts of this meeting of the Board will be 

open to the public (limited space available) and parts will be closed 

to the public. In order to increase the accessibility to Board 

meetings, persons requiring assistance should make arrangements in 

advance. The matters to be considered at the meeting are:



Closed Session



    <bullet> FCSIC Report on System Performance



Open Session



A. Approval of Minutes



    <bullet> March 25, 2010 (Open and Closed)



B. Business Reports



    <bullet> FCSIC Financial Report

    <bullet> Report on Insured Obligations

    <bullet> Quarterly Report on Annual Performance Plan



C. New Business



    <bullet> Policy Statement Concerning Appraisals

    <bullet> Mid-Year Review of Insurance Premium Rates

    <bullet> FCSIC Strategic Plan FY 2010-2015



    Dated: June 2, 2010.

Roland E. Smith,

Secretary, Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-13605 Filed 6-7-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6710-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 103 (Friday, May 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 29995]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13076]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, June 4, 2010.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-13076 Filed 5-26-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
1... See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-09-334-CV

DOROTHY MENEFEE, INDIVIDUALLY APPELLANTS

AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF EVOLLA TUTT 

AND EVOLLA TUTT

V.

LOUIS E. COSTELLO, M.D., APPELLEES

JACQUELINE A. FRAZER, M.D.,

ADEL ZAKHARY, M.D., MID-CITIES 

NEUROLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.A., SCOTT 

HALL, M.D., JAMES M. BARRY, M.D.,

LEWIS JONES, M.D.,

DAN ALLAN WADDELL, D.O., ET AL.

----------

FROM THE 67TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered appellants’ “Motion To Dismiss Notice of Appeal.”

It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we

dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).
2

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellants, for which let execution

issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: October 15, 2009
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of Glowpoint, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, David C. Trachtenberg, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for
purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that
to the best of my knowledge:

         1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company at the dates of and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date:  March 22, 2006

                                             /s/ David C. Trachtenberg
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             David C. Trachtenberg
                                             Chief Executive Officer
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5049 Filed: 12/10/19 Entered: 12/10/19 12:05:31 Page 1 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5049 Filed: 12/10/19 Entered: 12/10/19 12:05:31 Page 2 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5049 Filed: 12/10/19 Entered: 12/10/19 12:05:31 Page 3 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5049 Filed: 12/10/19 Entered: 12/10/19 12:05:31 Page 4 of

4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153-0119

EXHIBIT 1-I

E-Discovery Services

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-10 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page 1

of 13
6/27/2019

REDACTED VERSION OF THE PROPOSED REDACTED DOCUMENT

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-10 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page 2

of 13
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-10 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page 3

of 13
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-10 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page 4

of 13
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-10 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page 5

of 13
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-10 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page 6

of 13
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-10 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page 7

of 13
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-10 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page 8

of 13
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-10 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page 9

of 13
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-10 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page

10 of 13
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-10 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page

11 of 13
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-10 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page

12 of 13
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-10 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page

13 of 13
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4091    Filed: 10/03/19    Entered: 10/03/19 16:08:10    Page 1 of1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0267 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,
v. DAVID LOUIS TRENK,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including December 30, 20 20 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 23 2020

11/23/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0267
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 8, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 32268]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13635]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION



Federal Aviation Administration



14 CFR Part 71



[Docket No. FAA-2010-0249; Airspace Docket No. 10-ASO-22]




Establishment of Class E Airspace; Panama City, Tyndall AFB, FL.



AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.



ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



SUMMARY: This action confirms the effective date of a direct final rule 

published in the Federal Register April 1, 2010 that establishes Class 

E airspace at Tyndall AFB, Panama City, FL.



DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC, June 8, 2010.



FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melinda Giddens, Operations Support 

Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O. 

Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404) 305-5610.



SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:



Confirmation of Effective Date



    The FAA published this direct final rule with a request for 

comments in the Federal Register on April 1, 2010 (75 FR 16331), Docket 

No. FAA-2010-0249; Airspace Docket No. 10-ASO-22. The FAA uses the 

direct final rulemaking procedure for a non-controversial rule where 

the FAA believes that there will be no adverse public comment. This 

direct final rule advised the public that no adverse comments were 

anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, or a written 

notice of intent to submit such an adverse comment, were received 

within the comment period, the regulation would become effective on 

June 3, 2010. No adverse comments were received, and thus this notice 

confirms that effective date.



    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on May 27, 2010.

Barry A. Knight,

Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air 

Traffic Organization.

[FR Doc. 2010-13635 Filed 6-7-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
CERTIFICATIONI, Kokmeng Koh, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-Drequired to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K ofPrincipal Life Income Fundings Trust 2006-94 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and otherinformation required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by thisreport is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required inthis report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the ExchangeAct period reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement(s) in all material respects; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be includedin this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A. and Bankers Trust Company, N.A.Date: March 28, 2007   /s/ Kokmeng Koh     Kokmeng Koh  Second Vice President
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SteelCloud, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas P. Dunne
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:


1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 12, 2004

                                         By: /S/ THOMAS P. DUNNE
                                         ------------------------------
                                         Name: Thomas P. Dunne
                                         Title: Chief Executive Officer



                                       20
<PAGE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                   THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                        JANAURY 31,
                                                                1999                  2000

<S>                                                          <C>                   <C>
Numerator:
Net income (loss)                                            $  (547,673)          $ 160,702
Denominator:
Denominator for basic earnings per share-                      8,941,493           9,424,680
  weighted-average shares
Effect of dilutive securities:
Employee stock options                                                --
Warrants                                                              --
Dilutive potential common shares                                      --
Denominator for diluted earnings per share adjusted            8,941,493          $9,424,680
  weighted-average shares and assumed conversions
Basic earnings per share                                           $(.06)               $.02

Diluted earnings per share                                         $(.06)               $.02

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.2






CERTIFICATION
ACCOMPANYING ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K


OF


GREENLIGHT
CAPITAL RE, LTD.


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(CHAPTER
63, TITLE 18 U.S.C. SS.SS. 1350)






I, Tim
Courtis, hereby certify that the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008 of Greenlight Capital Re, Ltd., fully complies with the
applicable reporting requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and that the information contained
in such annual report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Greenlight Capital Re,
Ltd.




Date:
      February 23,
      2009
            /s/
      Tim CourtisName:
      Tim Courtis
              Title: 
      Chief Financial Officer