alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Space Command

USSPACECOM

                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 
                - 

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission         
  -  Warfighting Units         
  -  Frequently Asked Questions         
  -  Strategic Vision         
  -  Emblem 
-  Leaders    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Command Senior Enlisted Leader         
  -  Chief of Staff 
-  Support    -  Inspector General         
  -  FOIA      -  Making a FOIA Request         
    -  Reading Room 
  -  Equal Opportunity Coordinator         
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate         
  -  Command Chaplain         
  -  Commandant         
  -  Resilience Program 
-  Newsroom    -  News      -  FY2025 Testimony 
  -  Photos and Videos         
  -  Speeches         
  -  Publications 
-  Contact		 
-  Partnerships and Outreach    -  Academic Engagement Enterprise      -  AEE Articles of Interest         
    -  AEE Members 
  -  Careers      -  Civilians         
    -  Internships 
  -  Industry Engagement Portal 
-  Newcomers    -  Newcomer Information         
  -  Checking In 

# CONTACT US

Contact Me: A response is requested.

#### **QUICK LINKS**

#### Accessibility  |  Section 508    Web PolicySite Map  |  Defense.gov  |  Intel.govQuestions  |  Privacy and SecurityContact Us  |  Inspector General  |  FOIAOPM.gov  |  Plain Writing Act | MISONo Fear Act  |  Links DisclaimerUSA.gov  |  DoD Open Government

                  - Facebook
                  - X
                  - YouTube
                  - LinkedIn
                  - Civilian Careers

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5418 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5418

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To prohibit officers and employees of the Internal Revenue Service from 
      using personal email accounts to conduct official business.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. IRS EMPLOYEES PROHIBITED FROM USING PERSONAL EMAIL ACCOUNTS 
              FOR OFFICIAL BUSINESS.

    No officer or employee of the Internal Revenue Service may use a 
personal email account to conduct any official business of the 
Government.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 16, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5418

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To prohibit officers and employees of the Internal Revenue Service from 
      using personal email accounts to conduct official business.
```
#### STATE v. ROBERT WILLIAMS, Alias ROBERT McNAIR.

(Filed 3 January, 1940.)

Criminal Law § 80 — Appeal dismissed for failure of defendant to file statement of case on appeal within the time allowed.

Where the record contains no entry of appeal, although defendant was allowed to appeal *in forma*pauperis, and the clerk certifies that no case on appeal has been filed and that defendant’s counsel state that they do not intend to enter appeal or perfect same, and that the time for filing case on appeal has expired, the motion of the Attorney-General to docket and dismiss will be allowed, but when defendant has been convicted of a *741capital felony this will be done only after an inspection of the record fails to disclose any apparent error. Rule of Practice in the Supreme Court, No. 17.

Motion by State to docket and dismiss appeal.

*Attorney-General McMullan for the State.*

Stacy, C. J.

At the March Term, 1939, Cumberland Superior Court, the defendant herein, Eobert Williams, *alias*Eobert McNair, was tried upon indictment charging him with rape, which resulted in a conviction of the capital offense and sentence of death as the law commands on such verdict.

From the judgment thus entered, the defendant was allowed to appeal *in forma pauperis.*However, the record contains no entry of appeal, *Mfg. Co. v. Simmons,*97 N. C., 89, 1 S. E., 923, and the clerk certifies that no case on appeal has been filed in his office and that the time for filing same has expired. He further states in his certificate, “I have inquired of defendant’s counsel and they state that they do not intend to enter appeal or perfect an appeal.” *S. v. Stovall,*214 N. C., 695, 200 S. E., 426.

In the absence of any apparent error, which the record now before us fails to disclose, the motion of the Attorney-General to docket and dismiss under Rule 17 will be allowed. *S. v. Moore, ante,*543.

Judgment affirmed. Appeal dismissed.
#### MABEL BRIGHT, Administratrix of JAMES C. BRIGHT, JR., v. N. B. & C. MOTOR LINES, INC., and B. HAMPTON ELLINGTON.

(Filed 3 November, 1937.)

Master and Servant § 49 — Award under Compensation Act precludes action for wrongful death against employer.

An award by the Industrial Commission to the widow of an employee excludes all other rights and remedies, and the administrator of the *385employee may not maintain an action against tlie employer for wrongful death, and the fact that the injury resulted from negligence in the violation by the employer of a criminal statute does not alter this result. O. S., 8081 (r).

Appeal by the plaintiff from *Crammer, J.,*at April Term, 1937, of Pitt.

Affirmed.

*S. J. Everett for plaintiff, appellant.*

*Thos. W. Ruffin for defendant, appellee.*

Per Curiam.

This was an. action to recover damages for wrongful death alleged to have been negligently caused by the defendant motor lines in directing the plaintiff’s intestate to drive upon the public highways in an automobile with a trailer not firmly attached thereto, and equipped with inadequate brakes, in violation of the criminal statutes.

The pleadings (complaint, answer and reply) disclose that at the time the plaintiff’s intestate received the fatal injuries alleged in the complaint the defendant motor lines had more than five employees, including the plaintiff’s intestate, and that neither the plaintiff’s intestate nor the defendant motor lines had rejected the provisions of the North Carolina Workmen’s Compensation Act, and that said motor lines had procured insurance for its employees thereunder, and that an award had been made by the North Carolina Industrial Commission to. Appie Ger-rard Bright, widow of the plaintiff’s intestate, and was now being paid to her in weekly installments by the American Mutual Liability Insurance Company, insurance carrier.

Upon the pleadings the court awarded judgment for the defendants and the plaintiff appealed to the Supreme Court, assigning the signing of the judgment as error.

The award by the Commission to the widow of the employee excludes all other rights and remedies of such employee or his personal representative-against his employer at common law, or otherwise, on account of personal injury or death. The appellant’s suggested distinction between an injury by accident and an injury resulting from negligence due to the violation of a criminal statute cannot avail her. 0. S., 8081 (r), *Pilley v. Cotton Mills,*201 N. C., 426.

The complaint alleges no cause of action against the defendant B. Hampton Ellington.

The judgment below is

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   68,106
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                68,106
<PP&E>                                           4,963
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,218
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 193,389
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          328,799
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           211
<OTHER-SE>                                   (135,621)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                         17,181
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,181
<CGS>                                           58,576
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  170,631
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (153,450)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (153,450)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (153,450)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)





</TABLE>
#### William H. Harrison, Appellant, v. The Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company, Respondent.

Motion for a new trial denied, with costs, and judgment ordered for the defendant on the nonsuit, with costs. Opinion by

Boardman, J.
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4839    Filed: 11/22/19    Entered: 11/22/19 10:23:56    Page 1 of2

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4839    Filed: 11/22/19    Entered: 11/22/19 10:23:56    Page 2 of2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 240 (Thursday, December 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64159-64160]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30429]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP96-77-000]


Pacific Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

December 8, 1995.
    Take notice that on December 4, 1995, Pacific Gas Transmission 
Company (PGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1-A: Eleventh Revised Sheet No. 4, Third Revised 
Sheet No. 4A, Eleventh Revised Sheet No. 5, and First Revised Sheet No. 
5A, to become effective January 4, 1996. The proposed changes would 
have no effect on revenues from jurisdictional service.
    PGT asserts that the purpose of this filing is to adjust PGT's 
rates for service on its Medford Extension to reflect the as-built 
length of the line, as opposed to the length as certificated in the 
Commission's Order of January 12, 1995. PGT is also clarifying the 
calculation of rates on its Statement of Rates and Charges.
    PGT states that a copy of this filing has been served upon all 
jurisdictional customers and upon interest state regulatory agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or protest said filing should file 
a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 

[[Page 64160]]
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with 18 CFR 
385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure. Pursuant to Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations, 
all such motions or protests must be filed not later than 12 days after 
the date of the filing noted above. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-30429 Filed 12-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 10.48





EXHIBIT 10.48


BRIGHAM EXPLORATION COMPANY

1997 INCENTIVE PLAN

AMENDMENT
TO

OPTION AGREEMENTS


This Amendment to Option Agreements (the
“Amendment”) is made effective as of April 22, 2009 (the “Effective Date”), by Brigham
Exploration Company, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”).


W I T N E S S E T H:


WHEREAS, the Company and the Optionee have entered into
Option Agreements pursuant to the terms of the Brigham Exploration Company 1997 Incentive Plan; and


WHEREAS, the Option Agreements with respect to those
options listed on Exhibit A attached hereto are set to terminate on the Expiration Dates shown on Exhibit A
(the “Expiring Agreements”); and


WHEREAS, the exercise price of each of the options
underlying the Expiring Agreements is greater than the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock as of the Effective Date
of this Amendment; and


WHEREAS, the Company now desires to amend the Expiring
Agreements to extend the Expiration Date for one year;


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the
Company does hereby amend the Expiring Agreements as follows:


1. The Expiration Date for each Expiring Agreement is
hereby extended until the first anniversary of such Expiration Date.


2. Except as otherwise specifically set forth herein,
all other terms and conditions of the Expiring Agreements shall remain in full force and effect.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment
to be executed effective as of the 22nd day of April, 2009.


BRIGHAM EXPLORATION COMPANY


By:
                                                                 

Ben.
M. Brigham, President & CEO


ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED TO BY:


                                                                        


Dated:
                                                           





1









 





EXHIBIT A


Type                              
Date of Grant                              
# of Shares                              
Exercise Price                              
Expiration Date





2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# AGENCY:

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

HHS gives notice of a decision to designate a class of employees from the Canoga Avenue Facility, Los Angeles County, California, as an addition to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. On May 14, 2010, the Secretary of HHS designated the following class of employees as an addition to the SEC:

All employees of the Department of Energy, its predecessor agencies, and its contractors and subcontractors who worked at the Canoga Avenue Facility, Los Angeles County, California, from January 1, 1955 through December 31, 1960 for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days, occurring either solely under this employment or in combination with work days within the parameters established for one or more other classes of employees in the Special Exposure Cohort.

                        This designation will become effective June 13, 2010, unless Congress provides otherwise prior to the effective date. After this effective date, HHS will publish a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         reporting the addition of this class to the SEC or the result of any provision by Congress regarding the decision by HHS to add the class to the SEC.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Interim Director, Division of Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, OH 45226, Telephone 877-222-7570. Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to                         *DCAS@CDC.GOV.*

John Howard,

Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. 

[FR Doc. 2010-13795 Filed 6-8-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-19-P
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5714 

To permit commercial applicators of pesticides to create, retain, submit, 

and convey pesticide application-related records, reports, data, and other 

information in electronic form. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 14, 2014 

Mr. SCHRADER (for himself and Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To permit commercial applicators of pesticides to create, 

retain, submit, and convey pesticide application-related 

records, reports, data, and other information in electronic 

form. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pest Management 

5 Records Modernization Act’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 5714 IH

1 SEC. 2. USE OF ELECTRONIC RECORDS BY COMMERCIAL 

2 APPLICATORS OF PESTICIDES TO COMPLY 

3 WITH RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING RE4 QUIREMENTS. 

5 Section 1491 of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, 

6 and Trade Act of 1990 (7 U.S.C. 136i–1) is amended by 

7 adding at the end the following new subsection: 

8 ‘‘(h) ELECTRONIC RECORDKEEPING AND REPORT9 ING.—Notwithstanding any contrary provision of Federal, 

10 State, or local law, commercial applicators of pesticides, 

11 including commercial applicators of restricted use pes12 ticides, may create, retain, submit, and convey a pesticide 

13 application-related record, report, data, or other informa14 tion in electronic form in order to satisfy any requirement 

15 for such creation, retention, submission, or conveyance, re16 spectively, under any Federal, State, or local law.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5353 Filed: 01/13/20 Entered: 01/13/20 11:47:00 Page 1 of

29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5353 Filed: 01/13/20 Entered: 01/13/20 11:47:00 Page 2 of

29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5353 Filed: 01/13/20 Entered: 01/13/20 11:47:00 Page 3 of

29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5353 Filed: 01/13/20 Entered: 01/13/20 11:47:00 Page 4 of

29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5353 Filed: 01/13/20 Entered: 01/13/20 11:47:00 Page 5 of

29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5353 Filed: 01/13/20 Entered: 01/13/20 11:47:00 Page 6 of

29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5353 Filed: 01/13/20 Entered: 01/13/20 11:47:00 Page 7 of

29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5353 Filed: 01/13/20 Entered: 01/13/20 11:47:00 Page 8 of

29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5353 Filed: 01/13/20 Entered: 01/13/20 11:47:00 Page 9 of

29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5353 Filed: 01/13/20 Entered: 01/13/20 11:47:00 Page 10

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5353 Filed: 01/13/20 Entered: 01/13/20 11:47:00 Page 11

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5353 Filed: 01/13/20 Entered: 01/13/20 11:47:00 Page 12

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5353 Filed: 01/13/20 Entered: 01/13/20 11:47:00 Page 13

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5353 Filed: 01/13/20 Entered: 01/13/20 11:47:00 Page 14

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5353 Filed: 01/13/20 Entered: 01/13/20 11:47:00 Page 15

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5353 Filed: 01/13/20 Entered: 01/13/20 11:47:00 Page 16

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5353 Filed: 01/13/20 Entered: 01/13/20 11:47:00 Page 17

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5353 Filed: 01/13/20 Entered: 01/13/20 11:47:00 Page 18

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5353 Filed: 01/13/20 Entered: 01/13/20 11:47:00 Page 19

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5353 Filed: 01/13/20 Entered: 01/13/20 11:47:00 Page 20

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5353 Filed: 01/13/20 Entered: 01/13/20 11:47:00 Page 21

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5353 Filed: 01/13/20 Entered: 01/13/20 11:47:00 Page 22

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5353 Filed: 01/13/20 Entered: 01/13/20 11:47:00 Page 23

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5353 Filed: 01/13/20 Entered: 01/13/20 11:47:00 Page 24

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5353 Filed: 01/13/20 Entered: 01/13/20 11:47:00 Page 25

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5353 Filed: 01/13/20 Entered: 01/13/20 11:47:00 Page 26

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5353 Filed: 01/13/20 Entered: 01/13/20 11:47:00 Page 27

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5353 Filed: 01/13/20 Entered: 01/13/20 11:47:00 Page 28

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5353 Filed: 01/13/20 Entered: 01/13/20 11:47:00 Page 29

of 29