alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to

to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of SAVVIS, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



|(a) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |     |  |                          
|------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------
|Date: July 31, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Jeffrey H. Von Deylen
|                    |  |     |  | Jeffrey H. Von Deylen    
|                    |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer  



45
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 106 (Thursday, June 3, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 31464]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13285]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Certification of the Attorney General; Shannon County, SD

    In accordance with Section 8 of the Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. 
1973f, I hereby certify that in my judgment the appointment of federal 
observers is necessary to enforce the guarantees of the Fourteenth and 
Fifteenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States in 
Shannon County, South Dakota. This county is included within the scope 
of the determinations of the Attorney General and the Director of the 
Census made under Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. 
1973b(b), and published in the Federal Register on January 5, 1976 (41 
FR 783-84) and January 8, 1976 (41 FR 1503).

    Dated: May 27, 2010.
Eric H. Holder, Jr.,
Attorney General of the United States.
[FR Doc. 2010-13285 Filed 6-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
#### Cornelius Bort and another, Respondents, v. Adam J. Snell, Appellant.

Motion forreargument and for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals denied, with ten dollars costs.
#### W. E. WOOD v. AVERY JONES.

(Filed 19 February, 1930.)

Trial F a — Where it appears,that on© of the issues submitted to the jury was ambiguous a new trial will he awarded.

Where issues of. negligence, contributory negligence, and damages are submitted to the jury in a personal injury action, and the jury answers the first two in the affirmative and awards damages, a new trial will be awarded on appeal if it appears, in the light of the record, that the second issue was ambiguous.

Appeal by defendant from *Sinclair, J.,*and a jury, at November Term, 1929, of PasquotaNK. New trial.

The issues submitted to the jury and their answers thereto were as follows:

“1. Was the plaintiff injured by the negligence of the defendant as alleged ? Answer: Yes.

2. Did the defendant by his own negligence contribute to his injury? Answer: Yes. ■

3. What damages, if any, is plaintiff entitled to recover? Answer: $250.”

The court below on the verdict as rendered gave judgment in fa.vor of plaintiff. Defendant excepted and assigned error and appealed to the Supreme Court.

*357*Aydlett & Simpson for plaintiff.*

*Hhringhaus & Hall for defendant.*

ClaRKSON, J.

In tbe light o£ tbe record, we think the second issue ambiguous, and no judgment should have been rendered on the verdict. 27 R. C. L., under “Verdict,” p. 858, part sec. 30, speaking to the subject, says: “A verdict should be certain and import a definite meaning free from ambiguity. The jury cannot find both for the plaintiff and the defendant on the same issue, as for instance, by a verdict giving the plaintiff damages and finding the defendant not guilty. And a verdict which is too uncertain or indefinite to be construed either as a general or special verdict may be rejected by the court as meaningless and of no effect.” In *Rankin v. Oates,*183 N. C., at p. 518, it is said: “The court was without authority to reverse the jury’s finding on the second issue, answer it himself, and then render judgment on the verdict as amended. *Garland v. Arrowood,*177 N. C., 373; *Sprinkle v. Wellborn,*140 N. C., 163; *Hemphill v. Hemphill,*99 N. C., 436.” See *Bartholomew v. Parrish,*186 N. C., 81; *Lumber Co. v. Lumber Co.,*187 N. C., 417; *Alston v. Alston,*189 N. C., 299; *Sitterson v. Sitterson,*191 N. C., 319. There must be a

New trial.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5642 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5642

 To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to modify the eligibility 
             disqualification for certain convicted felons.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 18, 2014

   Mr. Reed introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to modify the eligibility 
             disqualification for certain convicted felons.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS.

    Section 6(r)(1) of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 
201(r)(1)) is amended--
            (1) by striking subparagraph (B),
            (2) in subparagraph (A)--
                    (A) in clause (v) by striking ``clause (i), (ii), 
                or (iii)'' and inserting ``subparagraph (A), (B), or 
                (C)'', and
                    (B) by redesignating clauses (i), (ii), (iii), 
                (iv), and (v) as subparagraphs (A), (B), (C), (D), and 
                (E), respectively,
            (3) by striking ``if_(A)'' and inserting ``if'', and
            (4) by moving the left margin of subparagraphs (A), (B), 
        (C), (D), and (E), as so redesignated, 2 ems to the left.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-2012-N-0145]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “Improving Food Safety and Defense Capacity of the State and Local Level: Review of State and Local Capacities” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        FDA PRA Staff, Office of Operations, Food and Drug Administration, 8455 Colesville Rd., COLE-14526, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,                         *PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On November 30, 2015, the Agency submitted a proposed collection of information entitled “Improving Food Safety and Defense Capacity of the State and Local Level: Review of State and Local Capacities” to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0726. The approval expires on January 31, 2019. A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at                     *http://www.reginfo.gov/​public/​do/​PRAMain.*

Dated: January 27, 2016.

Leslie Kux,

Associate Commissioner for Policy

[FR Doc. 2016-01785 Filed 2-1-16; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
IB 

Union Calendar No. 361 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 524 

[Report No. 113–485] 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to clarify that the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency does not have the authority to disapprove a permit after it has been issued by the Secretary 

of the Army under section 404 of such Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2013 

Mr. MCKINLEY (for himself, Mr. RAHALL, Mr. GIBBS, Mrs. CAPITO, Mrs. 

BLACKBURN, Mr. HUELSKAMP, Mr. GRIFFITH of Virginia, Mr. DUNCAN

of South Carolina, Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio, Mr. BUCSHON, and Mr. 

KLINE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

JUNE 20, 2014 

Additional sponsors: Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, Mr. SCALISE, and Mr. CRAWFORD

JUNE 20, 2014 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 524 RH

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to clarify 

that the Administrator of the Environmental Protection 

Agency does not have the authority to disapprove a permit after it has been issued by the Secretary of the 

Army under section 404 of such Act. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•HR 524 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMITS FOR DREDGED OR FILL MATERIAL. 

4 Section 404(c) of the Federal Water Pollution Con5 trol Act (33 U.S.C. 1344(c)) is amended by striking ‘‘The 

6 Administrator is authorized’’ and inserting ‘‘Until such 

7 time as the Secretary has issued a permit under this sec8 tion, the Administrator is authorized’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

Union Calendar No. 361 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 524 

[Report No. 113–485] 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act 

tion 404 of such Act. issued by the Secretary of the Army under secthority to disapprove a permit after it has been mental Protection Agency does not have the auto clarify that the Administrator of the EnvironJUNE 20, 2014 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

ORDER APPROVING THE 

AMENDMENT OF 

PENNSYLVANIA RULE OF 

EVIDENCE 901

:

:

:

:

:

:

NO. 841

SUPREME COURT RULES

DOCKET 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 20th day of May, 2020, upon the recommendation of the Committee 

on Rules of Evidence; the proposal having been published for public comment at 49 Pa.B. 

3876 (July 27, 2019): 

It is Ordered pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania 

that Pennsylvania Rule of Evidence 901 is amended in the attached form.

This Order shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and shall be 

effective October 1, 2020.

Justice Donohue and Justice Wecht dissent.

Additions to the rule are shown in bold and are underlined.

Deletions to the rule are shown in bold and in brackets.
#### STATE v. NEALIE BROWN et al.

(Filed 16 November, 1932.)

Criminal Law L d — Record in this case is remanded for correction.

The record of a ease is presumed correct and the trial court should not change it unless it contains error which it is his manifest duty to correct, in which case the trial court has the power at term to correct the error to make the record speak the truth, and on this appeal the ease is remanded for correction of the record, it appearing that the verdict of the jury was inadvertently recorded as “guilty of murder in the third degree” when the jury had returned a verdict of guilty of manslaughter.

Appeal by defendant, Nealie Brown, from *Cranmer, J.,*at July Term, 1932, of DupliN.

Criminal prosecution tried upon an indictment charging the defendants with the murder of one Ambrose Lanier.

Verdict: “Guilty of murder in the third degree.”

Judgment: Imprisonment in the State’s prison as to each of the defendants for a term of fifteen years.

The defendant, Nealie Brown, appeals, assigning errors.

*Attorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Seawell for the State.*

*J. T. Gresham, Jr., for defendant, Nealie Brown.*

Stacy, C. J.

It appearing that the verdict was inadvertently recorded “guilty of murder in the third degree,” when in reality the jury returned a verdict of manslaughter, the motion of the State to remand the cause for correction of the record will be allowed. *S. v. Harrison,*104 N. C., 728, 10 S. E., 131; *S. v. Farrar, ibid.,*702, 10 S. E., 159, *S. c.,*103 N. C., 411, 9 S. E., 449.

That the Superior Court at term has the power to make its records speak the truth, and, to this end, to correct them, if need be, is established hy a number of decisions. *S. v. Marsh,*134 N. C., 184, 47 S. E., 6; *S. v. Currie,*161 N. C., 275, 76 S. E., 694; *S. v. Bordeaux,*93 N. C., 560; *S. v. Davis,*80 N. C., 384; *S. v. Swepson,*81 N. C., 571. See, also, *S. v. Lea, ante,*35; *LaBarbe v. Ingle,*201 N. C., 814, 161 S. E., 486; *Durham v. Cotton Mills,*144 N. C., 705, 57 S. E., 465.

The presumption is, that the record as it appears is true, and the court ought not to interfere with it at all, unless, upon thorough inquiry, its duty of correction is manifest. *S. v. Harrison, supra.*

*514Ordinarily, the court may proceed *ex mero motu*to correct its records, and to make tbem speak tbe truth, but in *Durham v. Cotton Mills, supra,*it was suggested, as the better practice, to do so only after notice to the party to be affected by the correction, especially if the change be material. *Summerlin v. Cowles,*107 N. C., 459, 12 S. E., 234.

Remanded.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 239 (Wednesday, December 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64028-64029]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30385]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 64029]]


COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Arkansas Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Arkansas Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 6:00 
p.m. and adjourn at 8:00 p.m. on Wednesday, January 23, 1996, at the 
Wilson Inn-Airport, 4301 East Roosevelt, Little Rock, Arkansas 72206. 
The purpose of the meeting is to hold orientation for new members and 
plan for future projects.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Melvin L. Jenkins, Director of the 
Central Regional Office, 913-551-1400 (TTY 913-551-1413). Hearing-
impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services 
of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at 
least five (5) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, December 6, 1995.
Carol-Lee Hurley,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 95-30385 Filed 12-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4431 Filed: 10/23/19 Entered: 10/23/19 13:17:58 Page 1 of

2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SCHEDULE 1 

Anchorage Capital Group, L.L.C., 

on behalf of certain funds and accounts 

610 Broadway, 6th Floor 

New York, NY 10012 

Centerbridge Partners, L.P., 

on behalf of certain funds and accounts 

375 Park Avenue, 11th Floor 

New York, NY 10152 

Fidelity Management & Research Company, 

on behalf of certain funds and accounts 

245 Summer Street 

Boston, MA 02210 

Silver Point Capital, L.P., 

on behalf of certain funds and accounts 

Two Greenwich Plaza 

Greenwich, CT 06830 

SteelMill Master Fund LP 

c/o PointState Capital LP 

40 West 57th Street, 25th Floor 

New York, NY 10019 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4431 Filed: 10/23/19 Entered: 10/23/19 13:17:58 Page 2 of

2
Exhibit 35.3

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (Item 1123)

Homecomings Financial, LLC

RALI Series 2007-QS3 Trust (the Issuing Entity)

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Homecomings Financial, LLC, as servicer (the Servicer) pursuant to the applicable servicing agreement, does hereby certify that:

1. A review of the Servicers activities during the period from and including February 27, 2007 through and including September 24, 2007 and of the
Servicers performance under the applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such
review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout such period.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 24th day of March 2008.



|       |  |                     
|------ |  | --------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
|Name:  |  | Anthony N. Renzi    
|Title: |  | Managing Director
#### Mary I. Beckwith, Respondent, v. Dwight M. Beckwith, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Opinion by

Barker, J.;

Haight, J., not sitting.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 566 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 566

  To amend title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 
    1974 to provide for a guarantee by the Pension Benefit Guaranty 
   Corporation for qualified preretirement survivor annuities under 
          insolvent or terminated multiemployer pension plans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2013

Mr. Petri (for himself and Mr. Andrews) introduced the following bill; 
   which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 
    1974 to provide for a guarantee by the Pension Benefit Guaranty 
   Corporation for qualified preretirement survivor annuities under 
          insolvent or terminated multiemployer pension plans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GUARANTEE FOR PRE-RETIREMENT SURVIVOR ANNUITIES UNDER 
              MULTIEMPLOYER PENSION PLANS.

    (a) In General.--Section 4022A(b) of the Employee Retirement Income 
Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1322a(b)) is amended by adding at the 
end the following new paragraph:
    ``(3) For purposes of subsection (a), a qualified preretirement 
survivor annuity (as defined in section 205(e)(1)) with respect to a 
participant under a multiemployer plan which becomes insolvent under 
section 4245(b) or 4281(d)(2) or is terminated shall not be treated as 
forfeitable solely because the participant has not died as of the date 
on which the plan became so insolvent or the termination date.''.
    (b) Retroactive Application.--The amendment made by this section 
shall apply with respect to multiemployer plan benefit payments 
becoming payable on or after December 31, 1984.
                                 <all>
```
EX-35.1
(logo) AVELO MORTGAGE



Annual Compliance Statement

Re: The Flow Servicing Agreement dated as of January 1, 2006 (the "Agreement"),
among Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company and Avelo Mortgage, LLC and GSAA Home
Equity Trust 2007-1.

1. A review has been completed of Avelo Mortgage, LLC's ("Avelo") servicing
activities and its performance under the servicing agreement during the period
from January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007. This review was completed under
my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Avelo has fulfilled all
of its obligations under the agreement in all material respects, except as
described in the item below:

Avelo acknowledges that for a period in 2007, bank accounts were not reconciled
in strict compliance with Reg. AB. To address this issue, Avelo added
additional staff to ensure timely reconciliations and compliance with Reg AB.
As of the date of the audit, all bank account reconciliations were current. No
issues were found or arose from the delay in reconciling the bank accounts.

Avelo also acknowledges that for a period in 2007, escrow funds were not
returned to the obligor within 30 calendar days of full repayment in compliance
with Reg. AB due to a system issue. A system enhancement erroneously affected
the refund check process. Once the issue was identified, the system was
corrected.

As of December 31, 2007, escrow fund refunds were returned to the obligor
within 30 calendar days of full repayment, and no issues were found or arose
from the delay in returning the funds to the account holders.

I certify this information to be true and correct to the best of my ability.



/s/ David M. Altshuler
Name: David M. Altshuler
Title: Vice President and CFO
Date: March 10, 2008



Avelo Mortgage, LLC
250 E. John Carpenter Fwy
Irving, Texas 75062