alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000745651
<NAME>                        BUY IT CHEAP.COM, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                       1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1
<CASH>                                         45,733
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               75,523
<PP&E>                                         38,275
<DEPRECIATION>                                 11,967
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                101,831
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         161,448
<BONDS>                                        16,198
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                        10
<COMMON>                                        8,791
<OTHER-SE>                                     16,440
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  101,831
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    0
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               31,959
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (31,959)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (31,959)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (31,959)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0


</TABLE>
#### Stephen S. Newton, Appellant, v. John S. Wells and another, Respondents.

Judgment modified by striking out costs and allowance granted against defendant and as modified affirmed, without costs. Opinion by

Pratt, J.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 236 (Friday, December 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 63056]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-29911]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[UT-04-1430-01; U-74782]


Leasing of Public Land Washington County, Utah

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of realty action.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice involves a long term lease on public land in Utah. 
The lease is intended to resolve a long-standing agriculture trespass 
and would be offered non-competitively to the current user.

DATE: Comments should be received by January 8, 1996.

ADDRESS: Comments should be sent to the Area Manager, Dixie Resource 
Area, 345 East Riverside Drive, St. George, Utah 84770.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randy Massey, Realty Specialist, (801) 
673-4654 ext. 274.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following described public land is being 
proposed for a long term agriculture lease:

Salt Lake Meridian

T. 40 S., R. 17 W.,
    Sec. 29, SE\1/4\NE\1/4\; (portion of)

    containing approximately 6.7 acres.

    The area is currently being used as irrigated pasture and has been 
used as such for a number of years. The issuance of the lease would 
terminate a long-standing trespass. The proposed lease would be issued 
non-competitively to the adjacent land owner. Application for the lease 
will be accepted upon completion of the comment period. The lease would 
be issued for not less than fair market rental, and the lessee shall 
reimburse the United States for reasonable administrative and other 
costs incurred by the United States in processing the lease and for 
monitoring operation, maintenance, and rehabilitation of the facilities 
authorized. The reimbursement of costs shall be in accordance with 43 
CFR 2920.6.
    For a period of 30 days from the date of this notice, interested 
parties may submit comments to the Area Manager, Dixie Resource Area, 
address noted above. Any adverse comments will be evaluated by the Area 
Manager who may vacate or modify this Realty Action and issue a final 
determination. In the absence of any objections, this Notice of Realty 
Action will become the final determination of the Bureau of Land 
Management.
James D. Crisp,
Area Manager.
[FR Doc. 95-29911 Filed 12-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DQ-M
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

M. Ryan Pinkston (SBN 310971) 

rpinkston@seyfarth.com 

560 Mission Street, Suite 3100 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 397-2823 

Facsimile: (415) 397-8549 

Attorneys for 

Turner Construction Company

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION, 

- and - 

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, 

Debtors. 

☐ Affects PG&E Corporation 

☒ Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company

☐ Affects both Debtors 

*All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case, 

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Bankruptcy Case

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Chapter 11 

(Lead Case) 

(Jointly Administered) 

TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY’S 

NOTICE OF PERFECTION OF LIEN 

PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. § 546(b)

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4913 Filed: 12/01/19 Entered: 12/01/19 12:50:10 Page 1 of

5
1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 362(b)(3) and 546(b), Turner Construction Company (“Turner”) hereby 

gives notice of its perfection of, maintenance and continuation of perfection of, and intention to enforce 

to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, see, e.g., California Civil Code § 8400 et seq., Turner’s 

duly recorded mechanic’s lien for labor, equipment, material, and services provided by Turner to Pacific 

Gas and Electric Company, as more fully described in the attached Exhibit A. See Village Nurseries v. 

Gould (In re Baldwin Builders), 232 B.R. 406 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 1999); Village Nurseries v. Greenbaum, 

101 Cal. App. 4th 26 (2002). This notice is in addition to, and not in lieu of, Turner’s right and intention 

to enforce its lien to the fullest extent permitted by law. Turner reserves all rights. 

DATED: December 1, 2019 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

By: /s/ M. Ryan Pinkston 

M. Ryan Pinkston 

Attorneys for Turner Construction Company

56430669v.1 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4913 Filed: 12/01/19 Entered: 12/01/19 12:50:10 Page 2 of

5
EXHIBIT A 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4913 Filed: 12/01/19 Entered: 12/01/19 12:50:10 Page 3 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4913 Filed: 12/01/19 Entered: 12/01/19 12:50:10 Page 4 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4913 Filed: 12/01/19 Entered: 12/01/19 12:50:10 Page 5 of

5
Exhibit 31.1



Certifications



I, Robert S. Vor Broker, Chief Executive Officer and President of Keystone Automotive Operations, Inc., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Keystone Automotive Operations,
Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or
not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: May 16, 2005



|    |  |                                      
|--- |  | -------------------------------------
|By: |  | /S/ ROBERT S. VOR BROKER             
|    |  | Robert S. Vor Broker                 
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer and President
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5440 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5440

 To amend title 49, United States Code, to prohibit the Transportation 
Security Administration from accepting as valid identification an I-862 
                         Notice to Appear form.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 10, 2014

 Mr. Marchant introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 49, United States Code, to prohibit the Transportation 
Security Administration from accepting as valid identification an I-862 
                         Notice to Appear form.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Verified And Legitimate ID (VALID) 
Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. I-862 NOTICE TO APPEAR FORM AS PROHIBITED IDENTIFICATION.

    Subsection (a) of section 44901 of title 49, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: ``In requiring 
the presentation of a form of identification in the course of a 
passenger screening conducted under this section, the Transportation 
Security Administration may not accept an I-862 Notice to Appear 
form.''.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP

767 Fifth Avenue

New York, NY 10153-0119

Exhibit A

Competing Plan Confirmation Timeline

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4388-1 Filed: 10/22/19 Entered: 10/22/19 16:03:58 Page 1

of 2
Proposed Competing Plan Confirmation Timeline

December 11, 2019: Oral argument on inverse condemnation issue.

December 16, 2019: Oral argument on postpetition interest rate issue.

January 6, 2020: Oral argument on make-whole premium issue.

January 7, 2020: Tubbs trial begins in Superior Court (8 week trial estimate)

January 15, 2020: File initial Disclosure Statement (one combined Disclosure 

Statement for both plans)

February 18, 2020: Estimation proceedings begin in Federal District Court

March 4, 2020: Completion of Federal Court estimation hearing, including 

incorporation of Tubbs trial result.

March 10, 2020: File amended plans and amended Disclosure Statement to 

incorporate results of estimation hearing and any resulting change to 

exit financing.

March 20, 2020: Hearing to approve final Disclosure Statement 

May 1, 2020: Plan voting deadline, and deadline for confirmation objections.

May 7, 2020: Confirmation hearing.

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4388-1 Filed: 10/22/19 Entered: 10/22/19 16:03:58 Page 2

of 2
Exhibit 15.1



















CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-153304 on Form F-3 and No. 333-156843 on Form F-3 of our reports dated March 29, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Star Bulk Carriers Corp. and its subsidiaries (the "Company"), and the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010.





/s/ Deloitte .





Deloitte.


Hadjipavlou, Sofianos & Cambanis S.A.


March 29, 2011
#### ARTHUR V. MERTENS v. PROVIDENT MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PHILADELPHIA.

(Filed 3 January, 1940.)

Insurance § 34c—

Evidence that insured worked continuously as a bookkeeper at a salary of $1,800 per year until he was over sixty-seven years of age, though enfeebled by physical infirmities and lessening eyesight, *is held*sufficient to sustain insurer’s motion to nonsuit in an action on a clause in a life policy providing for benefits if insured should become disabled prior to his sixty-fifth birthday.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Ervin, Special Judge,*at June Term, 1939, of Forsyth.

Affirmed.

This was an action to recover for total and permanent disability under policy of insurance issued by defendant. Disability was defined in the policy as follows: “Disability caused by bodily injury or disease, *742which wholly prevents the insured, and presumably will for life continuously and permanently wholly prevent him from engaging in any business or occupation or performing any work for compensation, gain or profit.”

At the close of plaintiff’s evidence, motion for judgment of nonsuit was allowed, and plaintiff appealed.

*Winfield Blackwell and Vaughn & Graham for plaintiff, appellant.*

*Manly, Hendren & Womble and I. E. Carlyle for defendant, appellee.*

Per Curiam.

Under the terms of the policy, the disability for which claim is made must have been sustained before the insured became sixty-five years of age. He reached that age 23 July, 1934. He alleged total and permanent disability prior to that date. The evidence disclosed that he worked continuously as a bookkeeper at a salary of $1,800 per year until May, 1937, though enfeebled by physical infirmity and lessening eyesight.

The ruling of the court below in sustaining the motion for nonsuit must be upheld and the judgment dismissing the action

Affirmed.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

JSPAZ Guardian Energy Services, * From the 118th District Court

LLC d/b/a Guardian Energy Services, of Howard County,

and Jackson Thompson, as Guarantor, Trial Court No. 54288.

Vs. No. 11-20-00245-CV * June 10, 2021

Avalanche Equipment, LLC, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has considered Appellants’ agreed motion to dismiss this appeal 

and concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in accordance with 

this court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed. The costs incurred by reason of this 

appeal are taxed against Appellants.
#### STATE v. LIVINGSTON BROWN.

(Filed 19 November, 1958.)

' Appeal by defendant from *Olive, J.,*June, 1958 Criminal Term, Randolph Superior Court.

Criminal prosecutions originally instituted on affidavits and warrants returnable to the Recorder’s Court of Randolph County. The charges were: (1) Unlawful possession of intoxicating liquors; (2) Unlawful possession of intoxicating liquors for the purpose of sale; and (3) Carrying a concealed weapon. In the recorder’s court the defendant demanded a jury trial, whereupon “the cases were sent over to the superior court” for trial before a jury. Grand jury indictments were returned for the three offenses, which were consolidated and tried together in the superior court. The jury returned verdicts of guilty on charges 1 and 3, but failed to return a verdict on 2. The court imposed a j ail sentence of two years on counts 1 and 3 and provided the two sentences should run concurrently. The defendant appealed, assigning errors.

*Malcolm B. Seawell, Attorney General, Hairy W. McGalliard, Asst. Attorney General, for the State.*

*Ottway Burton, Don Davis for defendant, appellant.*

Per Curiam.

The defendant assigns as error the refusal of the court to sustain his motions for non-suit. The evidence, though not strong, nevertheless was sufficient to justify its submission to the jury.

The court’s charge as set out in the record with respect to the unlawful possession of whisky is technically incorrect; however, the defendant has not shown that he is prejudiced by the judgment. The sentence on the charge of carrying a concealed weapon must be sustained. The sentence on the unlawful possession charge runs concur*221rently and imposes no additional punishment. The failure to return a verdict on the charge of unlawful possession for the purpose of sale was equivalent to a verdict of not guilty on that charge.

No Error.
**QERALD**

**C. MANN**  **rrru ”**  **,.*****“ uu**  **OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAt,OF** TEXAS **AUSTIN**

Iion.L.L. Roberts, Oaunty Auditor siutotrinacn

ool.luty Stiunott , Texas Dear sir:

**I;as** ba dr f :or advised vhethw

7 * .+* md **provided rux**  thr that all l;heohildren **mai@-** Sq; in a school di&riet a%Jr be tmnsf~rred to mother diatriot, or to an independent dlstrlot,IIon.L.L. Roburts, 

### Bebruary 9, 1999; P8@ea

Article X387, R.C.S., reads, ia yzrt, i7I.y

Solla,rs: 'nib3~bli0 fiit0sOhO ii&UdR 01x111 not bc expended exoept for the Following purpQ5or: x** "2. Looal aohOo1 funds rrOm di8triot tuXefY,

tUitiOU ie6U Qi pUpi18 llotentitled to iree ttition and o‘lherlooal8ouroes my be wed for the purp08es enumeratt; ed for State and omnty tundrr'** 'W

Thurofore, ii In the o#nion qY the Board of TrUStW8, the purohaoe Oi 

### she baud utabm8 is d0euiea neoe8eary to the 

### eonduot of the p.iblio sohoola and Is so determined by the Ikmrd of l!XWtee8, it appe@rre that 1OCttl tax tWld8 ray be Bx purposes under.

Artiolo E&39, o4ended iOr euoh

ted abovq.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION

- and -

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY,

Debtors.

Bankruptcy Case 

No. 19-30088 (DM)

Chapter 11

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

Ref. Docket No. 4174

 Affects PG&E Corporation 

 Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company 

 Affects both Debtors 

* All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case, 

No. 19-30088 (DM)

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE

STATE OF NEW YORK )

) ss.:

COUNTY OF NEW YORK )

WING CHAN, being duly sworn, deposes and says:

1. I am employed as a Noticing Coordinator by Epiq Corporate Restructuring, LLC, located at 

777 Third Avenue, New York, New York 10017. I am over the age of eighteen years and 

am not a party to the above-captioned action.

2. On October 15, 2019, I caused to be served the “Certificate of No Objection Regarding 

Monthly Fee Statement of FTI Consulting, Inc. for Allowance and Payment of 

Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses for the Period June 1, 2019 Through June 

30, 2019,” filed on October 10, 2019 [Docket No. 4174], by causing true and correct 

copies to be delivered via messenger to the following party: U.S. Bankruptcy Court 

Northern District of CA, Attn: Honorable Dennis Montali, 450 Golden Gate Ave, 18th

Floor, San Francisco, CA 94102.

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4272 Filed: 10/18/19 Entered: 10/18/19 11:56:35 Page 1 of

2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3. All envelopes utilized in the service of the foregoing contained the following legend: 

“LEGAL DOCUMENTS ENCLOSED. PLEASE DIRECT TO THE ATTENTION OF 

ADDRESSEE, PRESIDENT OR LEGAL DEPARTMENT.”

/s/ Wing Chan

Wing Chan

Sworn to before me this 

18th day of October, 2019

/s/ Forrest Kuffer

Notary Public, State of New York

No. 01KU6369117

Qualified in Kings County

Commission Expires December 26, 2021

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4272 Filed: 10/18/19 Entered: 10/18/19 11:56:35 Page 2 of

2
---

CONSENT OF DAVID ROSS

The undersigned hereby consents to: (i) the filing of the written disclosure regarding (a) the technical report entitled “Technical Report on the Arizona Strip Uranium Project, Arizona, U.S.A.” dated June 27, 2012 and (b) the technical
report entitled “Technical Report on the EZ1 and EZ2 Breccia Pipes, Arizona Strip District, U.S.A.” dated June 27, 2012, in relation to, as applicable, (A) the Form 40-F Annual Report for the period ended December 31, 2013, and any
amendments thereto (the “Form 40-F”), of Energy Fuels Inc. (the “Company”), filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, (B) the Company’s Annual Information Form for the period ended December 31,
2013 (the “AIF”) and (C) the Management Information Circular of the Company dated July 15, 2013, and the documents incorporated by reference therein (the “Circular”); and (ii) the incorporation by reference of such disclosure
into (a) the Company’s Form S-8 Registration Statement, being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and any amendments thereto (the “S-8”), and (b) the Company’s Form F-10 Registration Statement,
being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and any amendments thereto (the “F-10”).

I also consent to: (i) the use of my name in the AIF, the Circular, the Form F-10 and the Form 40-F; (ii) the incorporation by reference of the Form 40-F, and the AIF into Form S-8; and (iii) the incorporation by reference of the Form 40-F, the AIF
and the Circular into the Form F-10.

“Signed”David Ross   
  David Ross, P.Geo.

Date: March 28, 2014

|RPA Inc.55
      University Ave. Suite 501 | Toronto, ON, Canada M5J 2H7 | T+1
      (416) 947 0907 | www.rpacan.com
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------

---