alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### James Hand, Respondent, v. Robert E. Dorcester, Appellant; Same v. Same.

The order of November 7,1885, is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Opinion by

Follett, J.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4430 Filed: 10/23/19 Entered: 10/23/19 13:12:29 Page 1 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4430 Filed: 10/23/19 Entered: 10/23/19 13:12:29 Page 2 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4430 Filed: 10/23/19 Entered: 10/23/19 13:12:29 Page 3 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4430 Filed: 10/23/19 Entered: 10/23/19 13:12:29 Page 4 of

4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EXHIBIT C

DISBURSEMENT SUMMARY

EXPENSES AMOUNT

Travel $26,477.63

Photocopy & Related Expenses 1,137.38

Outside Printing Services $419.83

UPS $406.30

In-City Transportation $55.02

TOTAL DISBURSEMENT $28,496.16

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4744-3 Filed: 11/14/19 Entered: 11/14/19 17:05:58 Page 1

of 1
EXHIBIT 12.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to Qiao Xing
Mobile, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under
our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of Qiao Xing Mobiles disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in Qiao Xing Mobiles internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the period
covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, Qiao Xing Mobiles internal
control over financial reporting; and
  a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
Qiao Xing Mobiles ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; andb.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role
in Qiao Xing Mobiles internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: June 30, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Kok Seong TanKok Seong TanChief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 237 (Monday, December 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 63499]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30089]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration


Antidumping Administrative Reviews; Time Limits; Correction to 
Notice of Extension of Time Limits

AGENCY: Import Administration; International Trade Administration; 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 11, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Kugelman, Office of Antidumping 
Compliance, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th St. and Constitution Avenue NW., 
Washington DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482-0649.

CORRECTION: In the notice of extension of time limits for certain 
antidumping administrative reviews, published in the Federal Register 
on November 7, 1995 (60 FR 56141), the Department incorrectly included 
the review of the antidumping duty order on sulfanilic acid from the 
People's Republic of China; no extension of time limits for that review 
has been granted, and the deadlines accordingly remain May 2, 1996, for 
the preliminary results of review, and August 30, 1996, for the final 
results of review. Furthermore, the correct case number for this order 
is A-570-815.
    This notice is published pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)).

    Dated: December 4, 1995.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Compliance.
[FR Doc. 95-30089 Filed 12-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Of

Chief Executive Officer And

Chief Financial Officer

Of NATCO
Group Inc.

Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, John U. Clarke, Chief Executive Officer of NATCO Group Inc. (the
Company), and, I, Bradley P. Farnsworth, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                  |  |  |  |  |  |                              |  |                                              
|----------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ---------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------
|                  |  |  | 
|Date: May 8, 2008 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    JOHN U. CLARKE       
|                  |  |  |  |  |  |                              |  | John U. Clarke Chief Executive Officer       
|                  |  |  | 
|Date: May 8, 2008 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    BRADLEY P.
FARNSWORTH
|                  |  |  |  |  |  |                              |  | Bradley P. Farnsworth Chief Financial Officer
### MANDATE



## Court of Appeals

First District of Texas

NO. 01

- 16

- 00890

- CV

PRAISE DELIVERANCE C HURCH , Appellant

V.

JELINIS, LLC AND HRE AL COMPANY, LLC , Appellees

Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3 of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 1080764).

TO THE COUNTY CIVIL COURT AT LAW NO. 3 O F HARRIS COUNTY,
GREETINGS :

Before this Court, on the 19th day of October 2017, the case upon appeal to revise

or to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on August 16, 2016. After inspecting the record of the court below, the Court holds that it lacks subject

matter jurisdiction over those issues in this appeal that challenge the coun ty court’s judgment awarding possession of the property which is commonly known as 2400 Eastex Freeway, Houston, TX 77026 to appellees Jelinis, LLC and HREAL Company LLC. Accordingly, the Court dismisses this portion of the appeal.

The Court further holds that there was no reversible error in the remaining portions of the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, theCourt affirms the remaining portions of the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that the appellant, Praise Deliverance Church pay all appellat e costs.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below
for observance.

Judgment rendered October 19, 2017.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Keyes and Judge. Opinion delivered by Justice Judge.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to obser ve the order of our said Court

in this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

May 25, 2018

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
CLERK OF THE COURT
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5608 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5608

    To take certain land in the State of Nevada into trust for the 
           Duckwater Shoshone Tribe, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 18, 2014

 Mr. Horsford introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To take certain land in the State of Nevada into trust for the 
           Duckwater Shoshone Tribe, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Duckwater Shoshone Land Conveyance 
Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Map.--The term ``map'' means the map entitled 
        ``Duckwater Reservation Expansion'', dated September 9, 2014, 
        and on file and available for public inspection in the 
        appropriate offices of the Bureau of Land Management.
            (2) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of the Interior.
            (3) Tribe.--The term ``Tribe'' means the Duckwater Shoshone 
        Tribe.

SEC. 3. TRANSFER OF LAND TO BE HELD IN TRUST FOR THE DUCKWATER SHOSHONE 
              TRIBE.

    (a) In General.--Subject to valid existing rights, all right, 
title, and interest of the United States in and to the land described 
in subsection (b) shall be--
            (1) held in trust by the United States for the benefit of 
        the Tribe; and
            (2) part of the reservation of the Tribe.
    (b) Description of Land.--The land referred to in subsection (a) is 
the approximately 25,977 acres of land administered by the Bureau of 
Land Management as generally depicted on the map as ``Reservation 
Expansion Lands''.
    (c) Survey.--Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary shall complete a survey of the boundary lines 
to establish the boundaries of the land taken into trust under 
subsection (a).
    (d) Use of Trust Land.--Land taken into trust under subsection (a) 
shall not be eligible for, or considered to have been taken into trust 
for the purpose of, class II gaming or class III gaming (as defined in 
section 270 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2703)).
                                 <all>
```
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Rodrick Dow d/b/a Rodrick Dow PC

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 3

- 00 806

- CV

Trial court case number: 977557

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 4 of Harris County

This is an appeal from a judgment signed on August 22, 2013. Appellant filed his notice of appeal on September 17, 2013. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.1. The record was due on October 21,

2013. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 4.1(a), 35.1. The clerk’s record was filed on September 30, 2013. The reporter’s record has not been filed.

On October 30, 2013, the Clerk notified appellant that the court reporter responsible for preparing the record in this appeal had informed the Court that appel lant had not requested preparation of the record or had not made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record. The Clerk further notified appellant that unless appellant provided proof of having made payment arrangements for the reporter’s record, or a r esponse showing that he was exempt from paying for the reporter’s record by December 2, 2013, the Court may consider and decide only those issues or points that do not require a reporter’s record. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(c).

Appellant has not provided th e Court with evidence showing that he has paid or made arrangements to pay the court reporter. Accordingly, the Court will consider and decide those issues or points that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See id.

On December 4, 2013, app ellant filed a motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief. However, appellant’s brief is not yet due. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(a). Appellant’s

motion is dismissed as moot.

A ppellant ’ s brief is ORDERED filed with this Court within 30 days from the date of

this order

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(a). Appellee’s brief, if any, must be filed within 3 0 days

after the date appellant’s brief is filed

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6( b ).

It is so ORDERED.Judge’s signature: /s/ Justice Evelyn Keyes
 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: December 12, 2013
[665 NE2d 191, 642 NYS2d 621]

#### Franklin W. Lorenz, Appellant, v Division of Taxation of the Department of Taxation and Finance of the State of New York, Respondent.

Argued February 8, 1996;

decided March 26, 1996

*1005APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Albrecht, Maguire, Heffern & Gregg, P. C.,*Buffalo *(Ralph J. Gregg*and *Alan J. Bozer*of counsel), for appellant.

*Dennis C. Vacco, Attorney-General,*Albany *(Andrew D. Bing, Victoria A. Graffeo*and *Peter H. Schiff*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff conceded that he was "a person required” to collect sales tax and was consequently personally liable for any such *1006tax that was or should have been collected (Tax Law § 1131 [1]; § 1132 [a]; § 1133 [a]). It follows that plaintiff was also subject to Tax Law § 1145, which provides that "[a]ny person failing * * * to pay or pay over any tax * * * shall be subject to a penalty * * * [and] interest” on the amount of unpaid tax. Plaintiffs contention that in this context the "person” referred to in section 1145 is the corporate entity on which the tax obligation was initially imposed is belied by the language and import of subdivision (a) (7). Under that subdivision, penalties and interest are to be "collected and enforced in the same manner as the tax.” Since the obligation to pay the tax may be enforced against plaintiff personally, so too can the assessed penalties and interest.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
LaSalle
      Bank N.A.135
      South LaSalle StreetSuite
      1625Chicago,
      IL 60603Global
      Securities and Trust Services




Annual
Statement of Compliance
 
 VIA:
EMAIL
 
 Bear
Stearns Asset Backed Securities I LLC
 383
Madison Avenue
 New York,
New York 10179
 regabnotifications@bear.com
 
 EMC
Mortgage Corporation
 2780 Lake
Vista Drive
 Irving,
Texas 75067
 
 Re:           Bear
Stearns Asset Backed Securities Trust 2007-AQ1
 
 
 Reference
is made to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of January 1, 2007 (the
“Agreement”), among Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I LLC, as Depositor,
EMC Mortgage Corporation, as Seller and Master Servicer, and LaSalle Bank
National Association, as Trustee.
 
 I,
Barbara L. Marik, a Senior Vice President of LaSalle Bank National Association,
as Trustee hereby certify that:
 
 (1)
A review of the activities of the Trustee during the preceding calendar year and
of the performance of the Trustee under the Agreement has been made under my
supervision; and
 
 (2)
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled all
its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such
year or a portion thereof.
 
 
 Date:
February 27, 2008
 
 LaSalle
Bank National Association, as Trustee
 
 
 /s/
Barbara L. Marik
 Barbara
L. Marik
 Senior
Vice President
LaSalle Bank
      N.A.135 South
      LaSalle StreetSuite
      1625Chicago, IL
      60603Global
      Securities and Trust Services




Annual Statement of
Compliance




VIA:
EMAIL




Merrill Lynch
Mortgage Investors, Inc.


250
Vesey Street


4 World
Financial Center, 10th Floor


New
York, New York 10080




Home Loan Services,
Inc.


150
Allegheny Center Mall


Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15212




Re:
      First Franklin Mortgage Loan Trust


Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2007-FFA






Reference is made
to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement"), dated as of January 1,
2007, among Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc., as depositor, Home Loan
Services, Inc., as servicer, and LaSalle Bank National Association, as trustee,
relating to First Franklin Mortgage Loan Trust, Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed
Certificates, Series 2007-FFA




I, Barbara L.
Marik, a Senior Vice President of LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee
hereby certify that:




(1) A review of
the activities of the Trustee during the preceding calendar year and of the
performance of the Trustee under the Agreement has been made under my
supervision; and




(2) To the best of
my knowledge, based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled all its
obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such year or
a portion thereof.






Date: February
27, 2008




LaSalle Bank
National Association, as Trustee






/s/ Barbara L. Marik


Barbara
L. Marik


Senior
Vice President
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP

767 Fifth Avenue

New York, NY 10153-0119

Exhibit 10

Proposed Final DIP Financing Order

(To Be Filed Under Separate Notice)

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 491-10 Filed: 02/19/19 Entered: 02/19/19 19:35:25 Page 1

of 1
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00445-CR

Michael Raynard Speace Jr.

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From Criminal District Court No. 2

of Tarrant County (1368270D)

July 23, 2015

Opinion by Justice Gardner

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Anne Gardner_________________

 Justice Anne Gardner
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4797 Filed: 11/18/19 Entered: 11/18/19 14:42:45 Page 1 of

12
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4797 Filed: 11/18/19 Entered: 11/18/19 14:42:45 Page 2 of

12
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4797 Filed: 11/18/19 Entered: 11/18/19 14:42:45 Page 3 of

12
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4797 Filed: 11/18/19 Entered: 11/18/19 14:42:45 Page 4 of

12
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4797 Filed: 11/18/19 Entered: 11/18/19 14:42:45 Page 5 of

12
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4797 Filed: 11/18/19 Entered: 11/18/19 14:42:45 Page 6 of

12
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4797 Filed: 11/18/19 Entered: 11/18/19 14:42:45 Page 7 of

12
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4797 Filed: 11/18/19 Entered: 11/18/19 14:42:45 Page 8 of

12
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4797 Filed: 11/18/19 Entered: 11/18/19 14:42:45 Page 9 of

12
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4797 Filed: 11/18/19 Entered: 11/18/19 14:42:45 Page 10

of 12
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4797 Filed: 11/18/19 Entered: 11/18/19 14:42:45 Page 11

of 12
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4797 Filed: 11/18/19 Entered: 11/18/19 14:42:45 Page 12

of 12
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 235 (Thursday, December 7, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 62900]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-29788]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL RATE COMMISSION
[Order No. 1091; Docket No. A96-6]


 Clarkia, Idaho 83812: (Jennie Carlen, et al., Petitioners); 
Notice and Order Accepting Appeal and Establishing Procedural Schedule 
Under 39 U.S.C. 404(b)(5)

Issued: December 1, 1995
     Docket Number: A96-6
     Name of Affected Post Office: Clarkia, Idaho 83812.
     Name(s) of Petitioner(s): Jennie Carlen, et al.
     Type of Determination: Consolidation.
    Date of Filing of Appeal Papers: November 24, 1995.
    Categories of Issues Apparently Raised:
     1. Effect on postal services [39 U.S.C. 404(b)(2)(C)].
    2. Effect on the community [39 U.S.C. 404(b)(2)(A)].
    After the Postal Service files the administrative record and the 
Commission reviews it, the Commission may find that there are more 
legal issues than those set forth above. Or, the Commission may find 
that the Postal Service's determination disposes of one or more of 
those issues.
    The Postal Reorganization Act requires that the Commission issue 
its decision within 120 days from the date this appeal was filed (39 
U.S.C. 404 (b)(5)). In the interest of expedition, in light of the 120-
day decision schedule, the Commission may request the Postal Service to 
submit memoranda of law on any appropriate issue. If requested, such 
memoranda will be due 20 days from the issuance of the request and the 
Postal Service shall serve a copy of its memoranda on the petitioners. 
The Postal Service may incorporate by reference in its briefs or 
motions, any arguments presented in memoranda it previously filed in 
this docket. If necessary, the Commission also may ask petitioners or 
the Postal Service for more information.

 The Commission orders:

     (a) The Postal Service shall file the record in this appeal by 
December 8, 1995.
     (b) The Secretary of the Postal Rate Commission shall publish this 
Notice and Order and Procedural Schedule in the Federal Register.
     By the Commission.
 Margaret P. Crenshaw,
 Secretary.

 Appendix

 November 24, 1995--Filing of Appeal letter
 December 1, 1995--Commission Notice and Order of Filing of Appeal
 December 19, 1995--Last day of filing of petitions to intervene 
[see 39 CFR 3001.111(b)]
     December 29, 1995--Petitioners' Participant Statement or Initial 
Brief [see 39 CFR 3001.115 (a) and (b)]
 January 18, 1996--Postal Service's Answering Brief [see 39 CFR 
3001.115(c)]
 February 2, 1996--Petitioners' Reply Brief should Petitioner choose 
to file one [see 39 CFR 3001.115(d)]
February 9, 1996--Deadline for motions by any party requesting oral 
argument. The Commission will schedule oral argument only when it is 
a necessary addition to the written filings [see 39 CFR 3001.116]
 March 23, 1996--Expiration of the Commission's 120-day decisional 
schedule [see 39 U.S.C. 404(b)(5)]

[FR Doc. 95-29788 Filed 12-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P