alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | Exhibit 35.1.5 |
|--------|----------------|

[Letterhead of HOMEBANC MORTGAGE CORPORATION]

 

 Statement of Compliance with the Master Loan Purchase and Servicing 

Agreement as of June 1, 2006 (the “Agreement”).

 

We have conducted a review relating to the performance of HomeBanc Mortgage Corporation (the “Company”) under the terms of the Agreement related to the servicing of the Mortgage Loans by the Company during 2007. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, which was conducted under my supervision, the Company has fulfilled its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout 2007 except as noted below:

 

| A. | Bank reconciliations were not completed within 30 days as required by item 1122(d)(2)(vii) (See Appendix A). |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| B. | Collection activities related to delinquent mortgage loans were not completed substantially in compliance with applicable Fannie Mae guidelines as required by the applicable transaction documents (see Appendix A). |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Dated: | February 15, 2008 |
|--------|-------------------|

| By: | /s/ *Marilyn Eberhardt* |
|-----|-------------------------|

| Name: | Marilyn Eberhardt |
|-------|-------------------|

| Title: | Vice President |
|--------|----------------|

**Appendix A**

 

**Bank Reconciliations:**

 

Bank reconciliations were not completed within 30 days as required by Item 1122(d)(2)(vii) for August and September due to resource contention issues related to the transfer of the servicing portfolio to JP Morgan Chase Bank.

 

**Collection Activities:**

 

Collection activities related to delinquent mortgage loans were not completed substantially in compliance with Fannie Mae guidelines related to “Moderate Risk of Foreclosure”. In addition, most collection activities were suspended during the month September while HomeBanc’s entire servicing portfolio was being prepared for transfer to JP Morgan Chase Bank.
#### TOBACCO GROWERS COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION v. J. F. CHILTON.

(Filed 2 December, 1925.)

Contracts — Fraud—Evidence—Pleadings.

In order to render void for fraud in its procurement a tobacco marketing contract made in conformity with the provisions of our statute, it is required that the member seeking to do so must introduce evidence of the fraud he relies on, as well as allege it.

Appeal by defendant from *Cranmer, J.,*at July Special Term, 1925, of ALLEGHANY.

Civil action to recover damages for breach of contract entered into between the parties and in which the defendant agreed to sell and deliver *603to the plaintiff all the tobacco produced by or for him or acquired by him as landlord or lessor during the years from 1922 to 1926, both inclusive.

From a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff, the defendant appeals, assigning errors.

*Burgess & Joyner and Kenneth G. Boyall for plaintiff.*

*Folger & Folger for defendant.*

Stacy, C. J.

The plaintiff is a cooperative marketing association, organized under “The Cooperative Marketing Act” of this State, chapter 87, Public Laws 1921, the constitutionality of which was sustained in *Coöperative Asso. v. Jones,*185 N. C., 265. The defendant is a farmer engaged in growing tobacco in Surry County. Under the standard marketing agreement, entered into between the parties, the defendant agreed “to sell and deliver to the Association all of the tobacco produced by him or for him or acquired by him as landlord or lessor, during the years 1922, 1923, 1924, 1925, 1926.” The defendant concedes that he has not complied with his agreement. He alleges fraud in the execution of the contract and seeks to avoid it on this ground. From a careful perusal of the record, we are unable to discover any evidence to support the defendant’s allegation of fraud. For this reason, his defense must fail. *Pittman v. Tob. Gro. Asso.,*187 N. C., 340. Allegation without proof is unavailing, unless admitted or not denied. *Dixon v. Davis,*184 N. C., p. 209.

The record presents no reversible error, hence the verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.
Fifth Department —

Decisions Handed Down July 1 and 15, 1895.

#### Frank D. Perry and Another, Appellants, v. The Lehigh Valley Railway Company, Respondent

Motion denied.
Exhibit 35
                                   ----------


                       COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                              OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                     ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                   CWALT, INC.
                         ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2007-HY2
               MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-HY2


      The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant to Section
3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i)   A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the Agreement
has been made under my supervision; and

(ii)  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                      Dated: March 14, 2008
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
400
      Countrywide WayFebruary 29,
      2008
              Simi Valley,
      California 93065-6298


LaSalle
Bank N.A.


Attn:
Andy Leszcznski


135 S.
LaSalle Street, Suite 1511


Chicago,
IL 60603


OFFICER'S
CERTIFICATE


I, Joseph
Candelario, hereby certify that I am an officer of Countrywide GP, Inc., general
partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP (the "Servicer"). I further
certify, with respect to the applicable servicing agreement relating to the
securitization transaction(s) set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto (the
"Servicing Agreement") that:


(a)  A review
of the activities of the Servicer during the preceding calendar year and of the
performance of the Servicer under the Servicing Agreement has been made under my
supervision; and


(b)  To the
best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its
obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout
such year.






/s/ Joseph Candelario February 29,
2008


Joseph
Candelario


First
Vice President


Compliance
Officer


Loan
Administration











Exhibit
A - Securitized Transaction(s)
 LaSalle
Bank N.A. -135 S. LaSalle Street, Suite 1511


LXS
2007-1
  LXS
2007-1
  LXS
2007-10H
  LXS
2007-10H
  LXS
2007-14H
  LXS
2007-6
  LXS
2007-6
  LXS
2007-9
  LXS
2007-9
  MLMI
2007-SL1
  MLMI
2007-SL1
  Thornburg
2006-6
  Thornburg
2007-3
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 54 

To provide that no pay adjustment for Members of Congress shall be made 

with respect to any pay period occurring during the One Hundred Thirteenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2013 

Mr. FITZPATRICK (for himself, Mr. POSEY, Mr. MCKINLEY, Mr. MICHAUD, 

Mr. TIBERI, Mrs. MILLER of Michigan, Mr. GRIFFIN of Arkansas, Mr. 

JONES, Mr. LUETKEMEYER, Mr. MATHESON, Mr. GARRETT, Mr. TIPTON, 

Mr. GIBBS, Mr. TERRY, Mr. HANNA, Mr. YODER, Mr. POLIS, Mr. WITTMAN, Mrs. HARTZLER, Mr. HUIZENGA of Michigan, Mr. BUCSHON, Mr. 

MICA, Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. MULVANEY, Mr. SCHWEIKERT, Mr. 

NUGENT, Ms. JENKINS, Mr. LANCE, Mr. OLSON, Mr. FLORES, Mrs. 

BLACK, Mr. MARINO, Mr. KELLY, Mr. BOUSTANY, Mr. GRAVES of Missouri, Mr. COBLE, Mr. PALAZZO, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. LANKFORD, and 

Mr. STIVERS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee 

on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently 

determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide that no pay adjustment for Members of Congress 

shall be made with respect to any pay period occurring 

during the One Hundred Thirteenth Congress. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•HR 54 IH

1 SECTION 1. NO PAY ADJUSTMENT FOR MEMBERS OF CON2 GRESS DURING ONE HUNDRED THIRTEENTH 

3 CONGRESS. 

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no ad5 justment shall be made under section 601(a) of the Legis6 lative Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 31), relating 

7 to compensation of Members of Congress, with respect to 

8 any pay period occurring during the One Hundred Thir9 teenth Congress. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5150 Filed: 12/17/19 Entered: 12/17/19 11:53:40 Page 1 of

1
**Exhibit 31.2**

**Certificationof the Principal Accounting Officer****Pursuant to****Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) underthe Exchange Act**

I, Gemma Lahera, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof HyperFeed Technologies, Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4.    The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have:

(a)          designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

(b)         evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)          disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5.    The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

(a)          all significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

(b)         any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 9,2006
|        | /s/ Gemma Lahera              |
|--------|-------------------------------|
|   | Gemma Lahera                  |
|   | Principal  Accounting Officer |

 

----
Signed and Filed: November 1, 2019

________________________________________

DENNIS MONTALI

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

Entered on Docket 

November 04, 2019

EDWARD J. EMMONS, CLERK 

U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4560 Filed: 11/01/19 Entered: 11/04/19 09:14:20 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4560 Filed: 11/01/19 Entered: 11/04/19 09:14:20 Page 2 of

2
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 1570

RONNIE LEE HOWARD , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. RED LOBSTER OPERATED BY DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC. , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Newport News

. Mark S. Davis , District Judge. ( 4:17

- cv - 00018

- MSD

- DEM )

Submitted : November 21, 2017 Decided: November 27, 2017

Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Ronnie Lee Howard , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Ronnie Lee Howard ap peals the district court’s order of April 14, 2017, dismissing without prejudice his employment discrimination action. After the district court dismissed Howard’s complaint for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies, Howard filed a notice of appea l to which he attached a copy of a right to sue notice issued prior to the filing of his federal action. The district court construed this filing as a motion for reconsideration pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) and issued an order indicating its inclinat ion to grant the motion. See Fobian v. Storage Tech. Corp. , 164 F.3d 887, 891

- 92 (4th Cir. 1999) (establishing procedure for handling Rule 60(b) motions filed while judgment is on appeal) . This Court remanded the matter for the limited purpose of conside ring the merits of Howard’s motion for reconsideration

. See i d

. On remand, the district court vacated the Apr il 14, 2017, order of dismissal

. Because the order on appeal has been vacated, this appeal is now moot. See Incumaa v. Ozmint , 507 F.3d 281, 286 (4th Cir. 2007) (setting forth principles of appellate mootness) ; Mellen v. Bunting , 327 F.3d 355, 363

- 64 (4th Cir. 2003) (“When a case has become moot after the entry of the district court’s judgment, an appellate court no longer has jurisdiction to e ntertain the appeal.”). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately prese nted in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DIS MISSED
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4871-5    Filed: 11/26/19    Entered: 11/26/19 16:57:30    Page 1of 8

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4871-5    Filed: 11/26/19    Entered: 11/26/19 16:57:30    Page 2of 8

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4871-5    Filed: 11/26/19    Entered: 11/26/19 16:57:30    Page 3of 8

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4871-5    Filed: 11/26/19    Entered: 11/26/19 16:57:30    Page 4of 8

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4871-5    Filed: 11/26/19    Entered: 11/26/19 16:57:30    Page 5of 8

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4871-5    Filed: 11/26/19    Entered: 11/26/19 16:57:30    Page 6of 8

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4871-5    Filed: 11/26/19    Entered: 11/26/19 16:57:30    Page 7of 8

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4871-5    Filed: 11/26/19    Entered: 11/26/19 16:57:30    Page 8of 8
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

January 5, 2024

SC-2023-0847

Ex parte M.P. PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE 

COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS (In re: M.P. v. DeKalb County Department 

of Human Resources) (DeKalb Juvenile Court: JU-20.282.02; Civil 

Appeals: CL-2023-0183).

CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT

WHEREAS, the petition for writ of certiorari in the above 

referenced cause has been duly submitted and considered by the 

Supreme Court of Alabama and the judgment indicated below was 

entered in this cause on January 5, 2024:

Writ Denied. No Opinion. Shaw, J. -- Parker, C.J., and Bryan, 

Mendheim, and Mitchell, JJ., concur.

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Rule 41, Ala. R. App. P., IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED that this Court's judgment in this cause is certified 

on this date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise ordered 

by this Court or agreed upon by the parties, the costs of this cause are 

hereby taxed as provided by Rule 35, Ala. R. App. P.

I, Megan B. Rhodebeck, certify that this is the record of the judgment of the Court, witness 

my hand and seal.

Clerk, Supreme Court of Alabama
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002)

In connection with this annual report of ChromaDex Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10K for the year ending January 1, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Frank L. Jaksch Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Thomas C. Varvaro, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.

Date: March 16, 2011



/s/ FRANK L. JAKSCH JRFrank L. Jaksch Jr.Chief Executive Officer/s/ THOMAS C. VARVAROThomas C. VarvaroChief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5518 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5518

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the continuing 
 professional education reimbursement provided to health professionals 
            employed by the Department of Veterans Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 17, 2014

 Mr. McNerney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the continuing 
 professional education reimbursement provided to health professionals 
            employed by the Department of Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Assuring Quality Care for Veterans 
Act''.

SEC. 2. IMPROVEMENT OF CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION REIMBURSEMENT 
              FOR HEALTH PROFESSIONALS EMPLOYED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF 
              VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    (a) In General.--Section 7411 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``shall'' and inserting ``may'';
            (2) by striking ``board-certified physician or dentist 
        appointed under section 7401(1) of this title'' and inserting 
        ``health professional appointed under paragraph (1) or (3) of 
        section 7401 of this title'';
            (3) by striking ``$1,000'' and inserting ``$1,600'';
            (4) by inserting ``required to maintain licensure'' after 
        ``professional education''; and
            (5) by adding at the end the following new sentence: ``No 
        such health professional may receive reimbursement under this 
        section and reimbursement for the same expenses incurred for 
        continuing professional education provided by a Department 
        medical center.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendments.--
            (1) Section heading.--The heading for such section is 
        amended to read as follows:
``Sec. 7411. Full-time health professionals: reimbursement of 
              continuing professional education expenses''.
            (2) Table of sections.--The table of sections at the 
        beginning of chapter 74 of such title is amended by striking 
        the item relating to section 7411 and inserting the following 
        new item:

``7411. Full-time health professionals: reimbursement of continuing 
                            professional education expenses.''.
                                 <all>
```
EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO 

In re:

Marcos A. Rivera Ortiz

2024 TSPR 31

213 DPR ___

Número del Caso: TS-5,398

Fecha: 3 de abril de 2024

Abogada de la peticionaria:

Lcda. Daisy Calcaño López

Materia: Reinstalación al ejercicio de la abogacía.

Este documento está sujeto a los cambios y correcciones del 

proceso de compilación y publicación oficial de las decisiones 

del Tribunal Supremo. Su distribución electrónica se hace como un 

servicio público a la comunidad.
EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO

In re:

Marcos A. Rivera Ortiz

TS-5,398

RESOLUCIÓN

En San Juan, Puerto Rico, a 3 de abril de 2024.

Examinada la Moción Sometiendo Documento y 

Reiterando la Solicitud de Reinstalación en el Ejercicio 

de la Abogacía presentada por el Sr. Marcos A. Rivera 

Ortiz, se provee Ha Lugar a la misma.

Se instruye a la Secretaría de este Tribunal a que 

tome nota en el expediente en cuanto a que la Lcda. Daisy

Calcaño López es la única representante legal del 

compareciente.

Se ordena la activación de las Quejas AB-2023-0187 y

AB-2023-0200 para que continúen el trámite

correspondiente.

Lo acordó el Tribunal y lo certifica el Secretario

del Tribunal Supremo. El Juez Asociado señor Martínez 

Torres emite la expresión siguiente, a la cual se une el 

Juez Asociado señor Feliberti Cintrón:

Denegaría la solicitud de reinstalación en esta 

etapa y hasta que se adjudiquen las quejas AB2023-0200, AB-2023-0187 y AB-2024-0015 que pesan 

en contra del Sr. Marcos A. Rivera Ortiz. En 

protección del interés público, deberíamos dar a 

las solicitudes de reinstalación el mismo trato 

que a las peticiones de admisión. Por 

consiguiente, antes de reactivar la licencia de

un solicitante se debe dilucidar cualquier

señalamiento disciplinario pendiente en su 

contra.

La Jueza Presidenta Oronoz Rodríguez se inhibió.

 Javier O. Sepúlveda Rodríguez

 Secretario del Tribunal Supremo
Schedule 2.1 to the Directors' Deferred Compensation and Benefits Trust Agt



 Exhibit 10.3 
 Schedule 2.1 
 to the 
 Directors’ Deferred Compensation and Benefits 
 Trust Agreement 
 Benefit Plans and Other Arrangements Subject to Trust 
 (1) Sunoco, Inc. Directors’
Deferred Compensation Plan I; 
 (2) Sunoco, Inc. Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan II; 
 (3) The entire funding for all the Indemnification Agreements with the directors set forth below shall be Five Million Dollars ($5,000,000.00) in the aggregate upon
a Potential Change in Control, and an amount upon a Change in Control calculated on the basis of the Indemnification Agreements with the following directors: 
 (a) Robert J. Darnall 
 (b) John G. Drosdick 1 
 (c) Gary W. Edwards 
 (d) Ursula
O. Fairbairn 
 (e) Thomas P. Gerrity 
 (f) Rosemarie B. Greco 
 (g) John P. Jones, III 
 (h) James G. Kaiser 
 (i) R. Anderson Pew 2 
 (j) G. Jackson Ratcliffe 3 
 (k) John W. Rowe 
 (l) John K. Wulff 
 (4) Benefits payable to former directors of the Company (or their beneficiaries) in pay status as of the date of termination of the Sunoco, Inc. Non-Employee
Directors’ Retirement Plan. 
 NOTES: 

	 	1.	Mr. Drosdick resigned as a Director of Sunoco, Inc., effective December 31, 2008. 


	 	2.	Mr. Pew did not stand for re-election at the May 7, 2009 Annual Meeting due to Sunoco, Inc.’s mandatory retirement policy for directors. 


	 	3.	Mr. Ratcliffe did not stand for re-election at the May 7, 2009 Annual Meeting due to Sunoco, Inc.’s mandatory retirement policy for directors.