alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Letter of Agreement with The University of Connecticut Health Center



 EXHIBIT 10.5 
 May 11, 2009 
 Michael F. Newborg, Executive Director 
 University of Connecticut Health Center 
 Center for Science and Technology Commercialization 
 263 Farmington Ave 
 Farmington, CT 06030-6207 
  

	 	Re:	License Agreement between University of Connecticut Health Center (“UConn”) and Antigenics Inc. effective May 25, 2001, as amended (the “Agreement”)


 Dear Dr. Newborg: 
 As you are aware,
Antigenics and UConn have been in good faith negotiations regarding our proposal of a potential [**] in certain annual license fee terms per section 3.1 of the Agreement and an [**] in certain milestone payments per section 3.2. 
 This letter serves to memorialize the parties’ agreement to extend the date for Antigenics to fulfill its obligations under section 3.1 of the Agreement until
June 15, 2009, while the parties continue their current negotiations to amend the terms of the Agreement. 
 All other obligations of the parties under
the Agreement shall remain in force. 
 Please confirm your agreement by kindly signing and returning one fully executed version of this letter to:
Antigenics Inc., 3 Forbes Road, Lexington, MA 02421, Attention: Legal Department. 
  

	
	Sincerely,
	
	/s/ Karen Valentine
	 Karen Valentine
 Vice President and General Counsel



 Acknowledged and Agreed: 
 University of Connecticut Health Center 

			
		
	By:	 	/s/ Michael F. Newborg
	Title:	 	Michael F. Newborg, Executive Director

 Date: 5/11/09 
 [**] =
Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a confidential treatment request. An unpredicted version of this exhibit has been filed separately with the Commission.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
     TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          7,739
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         25,959
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   326,781
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                              0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                0
<LOANS>                                       173,744
<ALLOWANCE>                                     1,380
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                574,541
<DEPOSITS>                                    312,879
<SHORT-TERM>                                        0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                           187,078
<LONG-TERM>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          900
<OTHER-SE>                                     73,641
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                574,541
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 3,331
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               6,216
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                9,547
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              3,284
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              5,730
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           3,817
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     120
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                173
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 2,358
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,677
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,305
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .18
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   2.93
<LOANS-NON>                                       283
<LOANS-PAST>                                      283
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   93
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 1,854
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                1,234
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       0
<RECOVERIES>                                       25
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               1,380
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0



</TABLE>
#### GRADY A. ZIGLAR v. LORRAINE ELIZABETH ZIGLAR.

(Filed 31 January, 1946.)

1. Trial § 17—

Plaintiff instituted suit for absolute divorce on ground of adultery. Defendant set up cross-action for divorce *a mensa, et thoro*alleging, *inter alia,*adultery on tbe part of plaintiff. At tbe close of tbe evidence defendant took a voluntary nonsuit on lier cross-action. *Helé:*Evidence of adultery on tbe part of plaintiff was competent at tbe time of its introduction, and in tbe absence of motion to strike when defendant withdrew her cross-action, plaintiff’s contention that he was unduly prejudiced by its admission is untenable. Rule 21.

3. Trial § 49—

Tbe setting aside of a verdict on tbe ground that it is contrary to tbe weight of tbe evidence is addressed solely to tbe discretion of tbe trial court. G. S., 1-207.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Nettles, J.,*at September Term, 1945, of FORSYTH.

Civil action for absolute divorce on ground of adultery.

Tbe defendant denied tbe allegations of tbe complaint, pleaded condo-nation, and set up a cross-action for divorce *a, mensa et thoro*on tbe ground that plaintiff’s improper relations with other women and indignities offered to tbe defendant were such as to render her condition intolerable and life burdensome.

Tbe case was tried on tbe allegations of tbe complaint and tbe cross-action, with evidence to support each and all of tbe allegations.

At tbe close of tbe evidence, tbe defendant took a voluntary nonsuit, without prejudice, on her cross-action; whereupon tbe ease was submitted to tbe jury on tbe allegations of tbe complaint.

Tbe jury answered tbe issue of adultery in favor of tbe defendant. From judgment denying tbe plaintiff a divorce, be appeals, assigning errors.

*John D. Slawter and Richmond Rucker for plaintiff, appellant.*

*Hoyle C. Ripple for defendant, appellee.*

*103Stacy, C. J.

Plaintiff assails tbe validity of the trial on the ground that he was unduly prejudiced by the admission of testimony tending to show adultery on his part. This evidence was competent, at the time of its introduction, as it was in support of the allegations of the cross-action. *In re Southerland,*188 N. C., 325, 124 S. E., 632; Rule 21, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N. C., 558. There was no motion to strike when the defendant withdrew her complaint against the plaintiff. On the record as presented, the exception cannot be held for reversible error. *S. v. Hawkins,*214 N. C., 326, 199 S. E., 284; *S. v. Tuttle,*207 N. C., 649, 178 S. E., 76, and cases cited.

Nor is the court’s charge on the issue of adultery open to valid objection. The issue was one of fact with the evidence contradictory. The jury has answered in favor of the defendant.

True it is, the plaintiff’s evidence was direct and positive, and he complains that the verdict is clearly contrary to the weight of the evidence. But this was a matter addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court. G. S., 1-207; *Goodman v. Goodman,*201 N. C., 808, 161 S. E., 686.

We have discovered no valid exception on the record. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

armclrl, 27, 1944, 

In wtioh you c sttqr prrrlourrl Mlbc?, saotsl Zwaiaan. 

hata ooorr~~& 

rrrrnt tlw by thr 

,n 8nd rrquret our 

y Mr. 3. Carl IIolder 

oaae, who lo @bout to 

110 Date1 Lsborat@r)* in 

OtWB8B~ to the rublie t@ Tcpati a platr clr dentutr Sor 8 aansldtratioa oi aonay. F-riois guotsd. 
Bonorabla I?. T. Mb.?, pago 2 

*Iis ha8 publlol,t bl8plSpd in 6bOU 

rlndow of his buainesr an array of &atmas or plater o? all typar or ar4t8rlal8 

In whlah hw propo888 to duplleatr th8 

patlenta’ old 4mtcra in 001 Of tin types 

that he ha8 dloplayrd iw a considrratlon 

or sonr7. 

'30 4mtlrt who 18 llcrMe6 to praotlor dantlatw in thr Stat. of Trr.8 18 

oormcotrd or work8 la thir Bskbllahamt. 

Article 45518 of t&a Trxas Dental laws dafinor persons a8 r8gd8a In the praotloa 

or thntirtry. 

Vhlr dsprtaant nqcrrtr your opinion: 

X8 tbi6 man'8, Xr. ThoratOn, bu6iaaa8 whioh 

ha 1s abc& to antar upon in violation OS 

rstlola UPa and 18 thim rrgard8d a8 praoticlag datietry a8 definea in Artlclaa 

45518 an4 b? Your 4bplslon 18 ~8p0atruiif 

requr*tad. * 

Artlolr 455ls,, Vernon*8 Amotatrd Cltll 

statutrr or Taxae, read8 In Fart as sollows: 

*&r prraoa shall be rugclrira as praotlolng dantlrtrf within thr maaal.u& oi t&l8 

chaptarr 

who aball otfar or undartakr . . . . to 

tf%;t~;d 

treat, 

& r&hod 

opersts or prororlbe, 

ror rlrg d&ea8r, 

p81n. irr~0~. mi0i&, a8r0titr 0~ 

physlosl ooadltion of the hoaan'taath,. 

slveolar proo888. auta8 or jaw8 anb oharge 

thrraror, dlractly or ladir8otl~,~ Boner or 

othrr owpmsatlon.~ 

Fabstarlr fntarartlonal Diotloaary, Seocnd. 

alition, 6ailms aaltaolar proos8e” aar 

Vhc rldga, or raised thlokened border, 

of the mandlblr and supsrior maxillary bcnrr 

xhioh contala the 8oaket8 or tibr teeth.* 
47 

SIonorablo 11. T. P;ab*r, paea 3 

nrtlclr 752b, Vernon’s Annotated FSnal CodS 

of ToxSS, provider amx& othSr thingm~that~ 

"It Shall be UldSWfU1 ?Or any perSon, 

fita, or oorporatlon t0 8n~agS In 01 be 

aulltt of anf onprofraslonal oorduat ln 

the yraotioa or dSati8trfe dlrsotly or 

ltxllrectl~. Any Qm~rofa88icnal oomYuot* 

as USad hersiD, acan and lnoluda8 any 

one or sore of the following acts, to-wit: 

=(qj Ad7ertiml~ to the public an7 

oolluneraial dental leborato~ or dental 

cllnlo.(' 

It i’sen ra,tbei ciaar to us that Mr. Thornton 

Is adrarti8%n& to the Fob110 8 OOZ6W~OlSl U8ntal laboratory in rlolatlon of Art1018 752b (q), Vcrnoa'8 AmotatSd 

Fans1 Cod8 Of hIS6. The ad+lirtl8ing of thr doing of 

ocrtclln aot8 bein& an UIIpr~f88810nS1 oonOuot In the 

praotica of ztcntlst~, tba doing of muoh sots would be 

the practloa of dentlst~. To duplloata, or offer to 

dupllcatr, a patlant~s old denture lot0 a type ot pIa to 

(?n diSpl87 in a “FubliC dent81 labcsatory' SOr 03m~SMStlon In prascrlbing or dirlgtmtlon of a rrmaaf fbr the 

rltrolar pr~oSsm and has barn daflnad mm a praotloa of 

dentistry by Article 455lr, VSrnon'r Annotated Civil 

Statutes at Taxae. 

To our opinion iour qcrmtlon Sbmld be l amtrarrd 

In the aitirqatltr. 

Yocr6 very tnllJ 

ATTQR?32Y ORE3?X. 07 ITXAS
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Solar Energy Limited a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, David Jones, Chief Operating Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/Dave Jones
 Dave Jones Chief Operating Officer
 September 8, 2003
#### Hester J. Todd, Respondent, v. Isaac Nelson, Appellant.

Keargumeut ordered.
lasalle logo
              
              
              LaSalle
      Bank N.A.
                135 South LaSalle Street
                Suite 1625
                Chicago, IL  60603
                
                Global Securities and Trust
      Services


Annual
Statement of Compliance





VIA:
EMAIL





Structured
Asset Securities Corporation II,


745
Seventh Avenue


New York,
New York 10019


Attention:
David Nass -- LB-UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-C1





KeyCorp
Real Estate Capital Markets, Inc.,


911 Main
Street, Suite 1500


Kansas
City, Missouri  64105


Attention:
Bryan Nitcher





Re:
            LB-UBS
      Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-C1 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
      Certificates, Series 2007-C1





Reference
is made to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 12, 2007
(the “Agreement”), among Structured Asset Securities Corporation II, as
Depositor, Keycorp Real Estate Capital Markets, Inc., as Master Servicer,
Midland Loan Services, Inc., as Special Servicer, and LaSalle Bank National
Association, as Trustee.





I,
Barbara L. Marik, a Senior Vice President of LaSalle Bank National Association,
as Trustee hereby certify that:





1.
            A
      review of the activities of the Trustee during the preceding calendar year
      and of the performance of the Trustee under the Agreement has been made
      under my supervision; and





2.
            To
      the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled
      all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
      throughout such year.








Date: 3/14/08





LaSalle
Bank National Association, as Trustee








/s/Barbara
L. Marik


Barbara
L. Marik


Senior
Vice President
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5700 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5700

To designate the community based outpatient clinic of the Department of 
Veterans Affairs located at 310 Home Boulevard in Galesburg, Illinois, 
     as the ``Lane A. Evans VA Community Based Outpatient Clinic''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 13, 2014

Mrs. Bustos (for herself, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. Shimkus, Mr. Quigley, Mr. 
 Lipinski, Mr. Rush, Ms. Duckworth, Mr. Rodney Davis of Illinois, Mr. 
Enyart, Mr. Foster, Mr. Gutierrez, Ms. Kelly of Illinois, Mr. Kinzinger 
of Illinois, Mr. Danny K. Davis of Illinois, Mr. Schock, Mr. Schneider, 
Mr. Hultgren, and Mr. Roskam) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the community based outpatient clinic of the Department of 
Veterans Affairs located at 310 Home Boulevard in Galesburg, Illinois, 
     as the ``Lane A. Evans VA Community Based Outpatient Clinic''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LANE A. EVANS VA COMMUNITY BASED OUTPATIENT CLINIC.

    (a) Designation.--The community based outpatient clinic of the 
Department of Veterans Affairs located at 310 Home Boulevard in 
Galesburg, Illinois, shall be known and designated as the ``Lane A. 
Evans VA Community Based Outpatient Clinic''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the community based 
outpatient clinic referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a 
reference to the ``Lane A. Evans VA Community Based Outpatient 
Clinic''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of Tara Mineral Corp.  (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending October 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Francis Richard Biscan, Chief Executive Officer and Clifford A. Brown, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his and her knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/Francis Richard Biscan President and Chief Executive Officer  January 28, 2009  /s//Clifford A. Brown Chief Financial Officer  January 28, 2009
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Meditecnic, Inc. (the "Company") on Form  10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof  (the "Report"),  I, Luc Badel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Luc Badel

By: Luc Badel

Chief Financial  Officer

December 4, 2008
#### J. VERNON SMITHWICK v. COLONIAL PINE COMPANY, Inc.

(Filed 17 September, 1930.)

Appeal by defendant from *Small, J-.,*at February Term, 1930, of Beetle.

Civil action to recover damages for an alleged negligent injury caused by a collision between the automobile in which plaintiff was riding and the defendant’s truck, which was negligently parked on the highway.

Prom a judgment overruling a demurrer, the defendant appeals, assigning error.

*J. H. Matthews for plaintiff.*

*S. L. Arrington for defendant.*

Pee CuRIam.

This is a companion case to *Smithwick v. Colonial Pine Company, ante,*431, the two arising out of the same collision, and are controlled by the same principles of law.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.0

|   | (1) | The      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended      March 31, 2009 (Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78m(a) or      78o(d), and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | May      4, 2009 | By:    | /s/ Thomas F. Prisby                                          |
|--------|------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |             |   | Thomas      F. Prisby                                         |
|   |             |   | Chairman      of the Board andChief      Executive Officer    |
|   |             |   |                                                          |
|   |             |   |                                                          |
|   |             |   |                                                          |
| Date:  | May      4, 2009 | By:    | /s/ Charles V. Cole                                           |
|   |             |   | Charles      V. Cole                                          |
|   |             |   | Executive      Vice President andChief      Financial Officer |

----
#### MINNIE KINLEY BROADHURST and J. N. WRIGHT v. BLYTHE BROTHERS COMPANY, A. H. GUION & COMPANY, CITY OF HIGH POINT, and SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY.

(Filed 22 May, 1940.)

Appeal by defendant city of High Point from *Olive, Special Judge,*at November Term, 1939, of Guileoeu.

Affirmed.

Motion in the cause by the defendant city of High Point for an order making the United States Casualty Company of New York, contract surety of the defendant A. H. Guión & Company, a party defendant.

*586Tbis is a companion action to that entitled *C avarnos-W right Go. v. Blythe Brothers Go., ante,*583. Tbe facts set forth in the complaint are substantially the same except that it is alleged that the plaintiffs herein are the owners of the property of which C avarnos-Wright Company were the lessees and damage to the property, through the negligence of the contractor, is alleged. After hearing the motion of the defendant city of High Point the court below entered its order denying the same. Said defendant excepted and appealed.

*G. H. J ones for defendant city of High Point, appellant.*

*Frazier & Frazier and R. G. Gherry for respondent United States Casualty Company of New York, appellee.*

Barnhill, J.

The decision in the case of *Cavarnos-Wright Co. v. Blythe Brothers Co., ante,*583, is determinative of this appeal.

The judgment below is

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT B 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5273-2 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 13:41:19 Page 1

of 16
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5273-2 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 13:41:19 Page 2

of 16
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5273-2 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 13:41:19 Page 3

of 16
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5273-2 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 13:41:19 Page 4

of 16
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5273-2 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 13:41:19 Page 5

of 16
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5273-2 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 13:41:19 Page 6

of 16
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5273-2 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 13:41:19 Page 7

of 16
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5273-2 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 13:41:19 Page 8

of 16
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5273-2 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 13:41:19 Page 9

of 16
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5273-2 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 13:41:19 Page 10

of 16
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5273-2 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 13:41:19 Page 11

of 16
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5273-2 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 13:41:19 Page 12

of 16
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5273-2 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 13:41:19 Page 13

of 16
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5273-2 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 13:41:19 Page 14

of 16
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5273-2 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 13:41:19 Page 15

of 16
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5273-2 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 13:41:19 Page 16

of 16
Recorded No. Amount Recorded No. Amount

1 2–10 21-17-442 Placer 7/12/2019 2019-0048862 $441,465.10 9/24/2019 2019-0072653 $16,495.09 Pac. Gas & Elec. Co. $424,970.01

2 11–17 21-19-305 Nevada 7/12/2019 20190013095 $8,940.47 9/24/2019 20190018690 Full Pac. Gas & Elec. Co. $0.00

3 18–24 21-18-333 Calaveras 7/31/2019 2019-008680 $36,100.74 9/24/2019 2019-011178 $17,003.15 Pac. Gas & Elec. Co. $19,097.59

Total: $444,067.60

Against Remaining

Exhibit A - Index of Recorded Liens and Partial Releases

Lien information Partial release information

Ref. no. Ex. B. pp. Job no(s). County

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4072-1 Filed: 10/02/19 Entered: 10/02/19 10:24:59 Page 1

of 1