alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10(l)


                           AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
                        INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT
                          SONOMA NATIONAL BANK

Recital
-------

This Amendment No. 1 to the Indemnification Agreement (the "Agreement")
dated February 16, 1993 between Dennis R. Hunter, ("Indemnitee"), and
Sonoma National Bank, a national banking association (the "Association"),
is made as of the 27th day of September, 2005, for the purpose of
clarifying Paragraph 7 of the Agreement regarding the laws and/or
regulations that limit the Association's ability to indemnify Indemnitee.

Agreement
---------

     1.  Amendment to Paragraph 7 of Indemnification Agreement.
         ------------------------------------------------------

     Paragraph 7 of the Agreement is hereby amended by the addition of a
     new Subsection (b) to read in its entirety as follows:

     "(b) Applicable Law.  To indemnify Indemnitee for expenses, penalties
          ---------------
     or other payments, or for any other amounts, in violation of
     applicable banking laws or regulations including, but not limited to,
     Section 12 U.S.C. 1828(k) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, the
     regulations of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation thereunder,
     or the regulations of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency,
     as now or hereafter in effect."

2.  Renumbering of Subsections.
    ---------------------------

     Subsections (b), (c), (d) and (e) of Paragraph 7 of the Agreement are
     hereby renumbered as Subsections (c), (d), (e) and (f), respectively.

Authorized Signatures
---------------------

     In order to bind the parties to this Amendment No. 1 to this
     Agreement, their duly authorized representatives have signed their
     names below on the dates indicated.

Sonoma National Bank                            Date Executed:  9/27/05
                                                              ----------
By        /s/ Deborah A. Meekins
          -------------------------
Address:      801 Fourth Street
              Santa Rosa, CA  95404

AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED:

INDEMNITEE    Dennis R. Hunter                  Date Executed:   9/27/05
                                                               ---------

Signature  /s/ Dennis R. Hunter
          ---------------------
Address:       4823 Bennett Valley Road
               Santa Rosa, CA 95405
Exhibit 32.1




SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION




I, Joseph Laezza, Co-Chief Executive Officer of Glowpoint, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1)           The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: November 10, 2009




/s/ Joseph Laezza


Joseph Laezza


Co-Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to Glowpoint, Inc. and will be retained by Glowpoint, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 16 (Tuesday, January 26, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 4344]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-01643]



[[Page 4344]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

National Science Board


Sunshine Act Meetings; Notice

    The National Science Board's ad hoc Task Force on NEON Performance 
and Plans, pursuant to NSF regulations (45 CFR part 614), the National 
Science Foundation Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1862n-5), and the 
Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in 
regard to the scheduling of a meeting for the transaction of National 
Science Board business, as follows:

DATE AND TIME: Thursday, January 28, 2016 at 10:00 to 11:00 a.m. EST.

SUBJECT MATTER: Task Force Chair's opening remarks; approval of 
minutes; NSF Director's update; and Chair's closing remarks.

STATUS: Closed.
    This meeting will be held by teleconference originating at the 
National Science Board Office, National Science Foundation, 4201Wilson 
Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230.
    Please refer to the National Science Board Web site (www.nsf.gov/nsb) for information or schedule updates, or contact: Elise Lipkowitz 
(<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#12777e7b62717d657b527c61743c757d64"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e481888d94878b938da48a9782ca838b92">[email protected]</span></a>), National Science Foundation, 4201Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, VA 22230.

Ann Bushmiller,
NSB Senior Legal Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2016-01643 Filed 1-25-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Kristina Denise Enterprises, Inc., et al., Appellants, v Barry Arnold et al., Respondents.

[772 NYS2d 592]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for accounting malpractice, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated January 17, 2003, as granted that branch of the defendants’ cross motion which was to compel them to respond to a demand for a bill of particulars and to comply with certain additional demands for disclosure.

*444Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

“The supervision of discovery, and the setting of reasonable terms and conditions for disclosure, are within the sound discretion of the Supreme Court” *(Provident Life & Cas. Ins. Co. v Brittenham,*284 AD2d 518 [2001]; *see Mattocks v White Motor Corp.,*258 AD2d 628, 629 [1999]). Under the circumstances, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting that branch of the defendants’ cross motion which was to compel the plaintiffs to respond to a demand for a bill of particulars and certain additional demands for disclosure. Ritter, J.P., S. Miller, Townes, Crane and Rivera, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SteelCloud, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin Murphy Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
of MY knowledge:


1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: June 10, 2004

                                               By: /S/ KEVIN MURPHY
                                               ------------------------------
                                               Name: Kevin Murphy
                                               Title: Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
#### Ashbel F. Bard, Appellant, v. John L. McKinney and others, Respondents

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1



Certifications



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Keystone Automotive Operations, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months and six months periods ended July 3, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |     |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 12, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ ROBERT S. VOR BROKER             
|                      |  |     |  | Robert S. Vor Broker                 
|                      |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer and President



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Apple REIT Eight, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-K for
the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
represents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company as of December 31, 2007, and for the period then ended.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/    GLADE M. KNIGHT 
|Glade M. Knight        
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|March 3, 2008          
|                       
|/s/    BRYAN PEERY     
|Bryan Peery            
|Chief Financial Officer
|                       
|March 3, 2008
Exhibit
13.1




PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
CERTIFICATION




PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In
connection with this Annual Report of Star Bulk Carrier Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Prokopios Tsirigakis, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


A
signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.




Date: 
      March 23, 2010/s/
      Prokopios
      TsirigakisProkopios
      TsirigakisChief Executive Officer and
      President
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5419 

AN ACT 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

for a right to an administrative appeal relating to adverse determinations of tax-exempt status of certain organizations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5419 EH

1 SECTION 1. ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL RELATING TO AD2 VERSE DETERMINATIONS OF TAX-EXEMPT 

3 STATUS OF CERTAIN ORGANIZATIONS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7123 of the Internal Rev5 enue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the 

6 following: 

7 ‘‘(c) ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL RELATING TO AD8 VERSE DETERMINATION OF TAX-EXEMPT STATUS OF

9 CERTAIN ORGANIZATIONS.— 

10 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall pre11 scribe procedures under which an organization de12 scribed in section 501(c) may request an administra13 tive appeal (including a conference relating to such 

14 appeal if requested by the organization) to the Inter15 nal Revenue Service Office of Appeals of an adverse 

16 determination described in paragraph (2). 

17 ‘‘(2) ADVERSE DETERMINATIONS.—For pur18 poses of paragraph (1), an adverse determination is 

19 described in this paragraph if such determination is 

20 adverse to an organization with respect to— 

21 ‘‘(A) the initial qualification or continuing 

22 qualification of the organization as exempt from 

23 tax under section 501(a) or as an organization 

24 described in section 170(c)(2), 
3 

•HR 5419 EH

1 ‘‘(B) the initial classification or continuing 

2 classification of the organization as a private 

3 foundation under 509(a), or 

4 ‘‘(C) the initial classification or continuing 

5 classification of the organization as a private 

6 operating foundation under section 

7 4942(j)(3).’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) shall apply to determinations made after 

10 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 16, 

2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5419 

AN ACT 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 

status of certain organizations. relating to adverse determinations of tax-exempt provide for a right to an administrative appeal
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

      In  connection   with  the   accompanying   Quarterly   Report  of  Summit
Environmental  Corporation,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report"),  I, B. Keith Parker, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78o(d)); and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November 22, 2005
                                            /s/ B. Keith Parker
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            B. Keith Parker
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

      The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350) and is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.
**Exhibit
      23.1**







**Kenne
              Ruan, CPA, P.C.**
            
            Phone: (203) 824-0441 Fax: (203)
              413-6486


40
      Hemlock Hollow Road, Woodbridge, CT 06525


kruancpa@yahoo.com




**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the filing documentation on Form
      10-KSB of Firstway Enterprises Inc of our report dated March 28, 2008, relating
      to the financial statements of the period from January 9, 2007 (inception)
      to
      December 31, 2007.









/s/
      Kenne
      Ruan, CPA, P.C.







Woodbridge,
      Connecticut


March
      28,
      2008
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 27, 2020.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-19-00436-CR

NOAH DAVIS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 230th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1559721

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant was charged with and pleaded “guilty” to possession of cocaine 

weighing four grams or more but less than 400 grams with intent to deliver. Texas 

Controlled Substances Act, Tex. Health & Safety Code §§ 481.102(3)(D), 

481.112(a), (d). Following a presentence investigation hearing, the trial court 

assessed punishment at imprisonment for eight years with no fine. Tex. Penal Code

§ 12.32. Appellant’s sole issue on appeal is that his sentence is grossly 

disproportionate to the crimes and therefore violates the Eighth Amendment to the 
2

United States Constitution and Article 1, Section 13 of the Texas Constitution.

A complaint that a punishment is grossly disproportionate is waived on appeal 

if that complaint is not raised in the trial court. See Lozano v. State, 577 S.W.3d 275, 

277 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2019, no pet.) (holding that disproportionatepunishment challenges cannot be raised for the first time on appeal); Quick v. State, 

557 S.W.3d 775, 788 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2018, pet. ref’d) (holding 

that disproportionate-punishment challenges under Texas Constitution cannot be 

raised for the first time on appeal). Appellant did not lodge any complaint in the 

trial court regarding his punishment. Therefore, he has not preserved error for 

appellate review. See Lozano, 577 S.W.3d at 277; Quick, 557 S.W.3d at 788..

We overrule appellant’s sole issue and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Spain.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
EXHIBIT 31


                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a
                           14(a)/15D-14(a) and SECTION
                          302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


I, Joey DiFrancesco, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive
officer) and principal financial officer of Raven Moon Entertainment, Inc. (the
"Registrant"), certify that:


1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I am responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and





Dated: May 15, 2005                         /s/  Joey DiFrancesco
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Joey DiFrancesco, President,
                                                 Chief Executive Officer and
                                                 principal financial officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-2333

DANIEL T. MILLER, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

HELEN MELTON,

Plaintiff,

versus

GLENN V. LONGACRE, JR.; WANDA LONGACRE; JOHN

MOORE; HELEN MOORE; ANY AND ALL JOHN AND JANE

DOE CLAIMANTS,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

BROOKS RUN COAL COMPANY,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior

District Judge. (CA-96-175-2)

Submitted: December 5, 2000 Decided: December 19, 2000

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel T. Miller, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William Tracey Weber,

Jr., WEBER & WEBER, Weston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Daniel T. Miller appeals the district court’s judgment and

order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing

his action to quiet title. We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Miller v.

Longacre, No. CA-96-175-2 (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 28, 2000). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Henry Tyson and others, Respondents, v. Henry A. V. Post, Appellant, Impleaded, etc.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, .costs to abide event. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.;

Dykman, J., dissenting.