alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit C

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4297-3 Filed: 10/18/19 Entered: 10/18/19 15:22:36 Page 1

of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In re

PG&E CORPORATION

-andPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY,

Debtors.

Case No. 3:19-cv-05257-JD

SCHEDULING ORDER

The Court sets the following schedule for the Section 502(c) estimation proceedings in this 

case. The parties are advised to review and comply with the Court’s Standing Order for Civil 

Cases and Standing Order for Discovery in Civil Cases, as applicable. 

Event Deadline

Substantial completion of document production by PG&E 

responsive to current requests.

October 15, 2019

Initial disclosure of fact and expert witnesses, with expert type 

and subject matter.

October 23, 2019

Disclosure of documents likely to be used at the hearing or 

relied upon by experts.

December 2, 2019

Exchange initial expert reports, documents and data. December 13, 2019

Close of fact discovery. December 23, 2019

Exchange rebuttal expert reports, documents and data. January 13, 2020

File witness lists. January 15, 2020

Case 3:19-cv-05257-JD Document 113 Filed 10/11/19 Page 1 of 2

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4297-3 Filed: 10/18/19 Entered: 10/18/19 15:22:36 Page 2

of 3
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Event Deadline

Close of expert discovery. February 6, 2020

File exhibit lists. February 6, 2020

Exchange objections to exhibits. February 12, 2020

File opening briefs. February 12, 2020

First day of hearing. February 18, 2020

All the dates set by the Court should be regarded as firm. Counsel may not modify these 

dates by stipulation without leave of court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 11, 2019

JAMES DONATO

United States District Judge

Case 3:19-cv-05257-JD Document 113 Filed 10/11/19 Page 2 of 2

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4297-3 Filed: 10/18/19 Entered: 10/18/19 15:22:36 Page 3

of 3
#### STATE v. JOE BROWN.

(Filed 25 March, 1953.)

Criminal Law § 56: Indictment and Warrant § 11 *%*—

Where a defendant charged with a felony pleads guilty to a misdemeanor, his motion in arrest of judgment for defect in the indictment charging the felony cannot be sustained, since sentence in such case is based upon defendant’s voluntary plea and not upon the indictment.

Appeal by defendant from *Sharp, Special Judge,*September Term, 1952, of CRAVEN.

Criminal prosecution upon a warrant issued out of Craven County Recorder’s Court charging that on or about 1 May, 1952, the defendant committed an assault upon Beatrice Rhodes, a female, he being a man over eighteen years of age; that said assault was made with a deadly weapon, to wit: a knife, with intent to kill, and did inflict serious injury.

The defendant appeared in the Recorder’s Court and through his counsel waived a preliminary hearing and was bound over to the Superior Court.

A bill of indictment was returned against the defendant at the September Term, 1952, of the Superior Court of Craven County, charging him with the same offense set out in the warrant. The bill was marked “A True Bill” and signed by the foreman of the grand jury. To this bill the defendant entered a plea of guilty to an assault on a female.

The defendant was sentenced for a period of twenty-four (24) months to be confined in the common jail of Craven County and assigned to work on the roads of the State under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission.

*440Tbe defendant moved in arrest of judgment on tbe ground that tbe bill of indictment is void on its face for failure to show clearly what action tbe grand jury took. Tbe motion was denied and tbe defendant excepted and appealed to tbis Court.

*Attorney-General McMullan, Assistant Attorney-General Bruton, and Robert L. Emanuel, Member of Staff, for the State.*

Pee Ctjbiam.

There is nothing on tbe record before us to indicate any vagueness or irregularity by tbe grand jury in returning tbe bill of indictment as “A True Bill.” Moreover, where a defendant is charged with a felony and pleads guilty to a misdemeanor, bis motion in arrest' of judgment for defect in the indictment charging tbe felony cannot be sustained. Tbe sentence in such cases is based upon the defendant’s voluntary plea and not upon tbe indictment for a felony. *S. v. Ray,*212 N.C. 748, 194 S.E. 472; *S. v. McKeon,*223 N.C. 404, 26 S.E. 2d 914.

Tbe judgment below is

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32

| |  |  |  | CERTIFICATION |  | OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
| |  |  |  | ------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Solar Energy Limited (Registrant) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Andrew Wallace, chief executive officer and chief financial officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) |  | This Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of Registrant at the end of the period covered by this Report and results of operations of Registrant for the period covered by this Report.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Andrew Wallace

Andrew Wallace

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

May 19, 2006

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         652,124
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  942,247
<ALLOWANCES>                                   425,095
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,788,827
<PP&E>                                      10,673,156
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,073,849
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,774,583
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,216,769
<BONDS>                                      1,025,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,365
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,443,637
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,774,583
<SALES>                                      4,055,067
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,055,067
<CGS>                                        3,438,699
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,438,699
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,363,187
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               195,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             163,278
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,900,755)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,900,755)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.26)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>




EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF FORM 10-Q

We, Thomas F. Prisby, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and John T. Stephens,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of CFS Bancorp, Inc.,
hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)           The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
              period ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
              requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
              Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m (a) or 78o(d)) and

(2)           The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.


Date:  August 14, 2002              By:     /s/
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                            Thomas F. Prisby, Chairman and
                                               Chief Executive Officer

Date:  August 14, 2002              By:     /s/
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                            John T. Stephens, Executive
                                                  Vice President and
                                               Chief Financial Officer
[666 NE2d 1051, 644 NYS2d 138]

#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Wayne Clarke, Respondent.

Decided April 4, 1996

*1043APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Kevin M. Dillon, District Attorney*of Erie County, Buffalo *(Raymond C. Herman*of counsel), for appellant.

*Wayne Clarke, pro se,*and *Mary E. Good,*Buffalo, and *Linda S. Reynolds,*for Wayne Clarke, respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order reversed and case remitted to the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, for consideration of issues raised but not considered on the appeal to that court and consideration of the facts pursuant to CPL 470.25 (2) (d) and 470.40 (2) (b) *(see, People v Goss,*87 NY2d 792 [decided today]; *People v Avery,*87 NY2d 792 [decided today]).

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick.
ex10_141.htm




Exhibit 10.14.1





 

Logitech International S.A.

 

Executive Officer Base Salary under Form of Employment Agreements dated December 3, 2008

 

    The following information is provided as a supplement to Exhibit 10.14 to Logitech’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009, and lists the base salary of each of the executive officers named below as of December 3, 2008, the date of their form of employment agreements filed as Exhibit
10.14.

 






	
Name
	
Title
	 	
Base Salary
	 
	
Mark J. Hawkins
	
Former Senior Vice President, Finance and Information Technology, and Chief Financial Officer
	 	$	460,000	 
	
Junien Labrousse
	
Executive Vice President, Products
	 	$	680,000	 
	
David Henry
	
Senior Vice President, Customer Experience and Chief Marketing Officer
	 	$	460,000	 
	
L. Joseph Sullivan
	
Senior Vice President, Worldwide Operations
	 	$	340,000	 



 

Mr. Hawkins’ service with Logitech terminated April 24, 2009.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 239 (Wednesday, December 13, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Pages 64100-64101]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30444]



Sunshine Act Notice




FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE BOARD

``FEDERAL REGISTER'' CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 60 FR 61736, 
December 1, 1995.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING: 10:00 a.m., December 
8, 1995.


[[Page 64101]]

CHANGES IN THE MEETING: The following topic was withdrawn from the open 
portion of the meeting:

    <bullet> Federal Home Loan Bank of Dallas' CIP Request.
    <bullet> The Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati Request for an 
Exception to the Limit on Charitable Contributions.

    The following topic was added to the open portion of the meeting.

    <bullet> Repeal of Finance Board Regulation on Charitable 
Donations by the FHLBanks.

    The Board determined that agency business requires its 
consideration of these matters on less than seven days notice to the 
public and that no earlier notice of these changes in the subject 
matter of the meeting was possible.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Elaine L. Baker, Secretary to the 
Board, (202) 408-2837.
Rita I. Fair,

Managing Director.

[FR Doc. 95-30444 Filed 12-11-95; 9:46 am]

BILLING CODE 6725-01-P
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

MARCH 20, 2012

JOHN LEY

CLERK

 [DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 ________________________

 No. 11-10774 

 ________________________

 D.C. Docket No. 5:10-cv-02698-CLS

JEROME SIROTE, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BBVA COMPASS BANK, et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

________________________

 Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Northern District of Alabama

 ________________________

(March 20, 2012)

Before BARKETT and HULL, Circuit Judges, and HUNT, District Judge. *

PER CURIAM:

Honorable Willis B. Hunt, Jr., United States District Judge for the Northern District of *

Georgia, sitting by designation. 
After review of the record and with the benefit of oral argument, we discern

no reversible error in the district court’s December 30, 2010 order dismissing the

plaintiff’s federal claims with prejudice and dismissing the plaintiff’s state law

claims without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c). We likewise discern no

reversible error in the district court’s February 1, 2011 order denying the

plaintiff’s motion to alter or amend the December 30, 2010 dismissal order.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders dated December 30, 2010, and

February 1, 2011.

AFFIRMED.

2
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON



### O RDER 

### W ITHDRAWING 

### M EDIATION 

### O RDER

Cause number: 01

- 18

- 00886

- CV

Style: In the Interest of E. C. D. child v. Department of Family and Protective

Services

Date motion filed: November 19, 20 18

Type of Motion: Objection to Mediation

Party filing motion: Intervenor



### It is ordered that Intervenor’ s objection to mediation is granted. We withdraw our

Mediation Order dated November 14, 2018.

Judge's signature: /s/ Jennifer V Caughey

x Acting individ ually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of

Date: November 27, 2018

* Absent emergency or a statement that the motion is unopposed, must wait ten days before acting on motion except for

motion to extend time to file a brief. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 10.3(a).

Note : Single justice may grant or deny any request for relief properly sought by motion, except in a civil case a single justice

should not: (1) act on a petition for an extraordinary writ or (2 ) dismiss or otherwise determine an appeal or a motion

for rehearing. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 10.4(a).
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3398    Filed: 08/06/19    Entered: 08/06/19 18:24:55    Page 1 of2

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3398    Filed: 08/06/19    Entered: 08/06/19 18:24:55    Page 2 of2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 235 (Thursday, December 7, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62898-62899]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-29816]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Application for a License to Import Nuclear Waste

    Pursuant to 10 CFR 110.70(b) ``Public notice of receipt of an 
application'', please take notice that the Nuclear Regulatory 
Commission has received the following application for an import 
license. Copies of the application are on file in the Nuclear 
Regulatory Commission's Public Document Room located at 2120 L Street, 
N.W., Washington, D.C.
    A request for a hearing or petition for leave to intervene may be 
filed within 30 days after publication of this notice in the Federal 
Register. Any request for hearing or petition for leave to intervene 
shall be served by the requestor or petitioner upon the applicant, the 
Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 
Washington, D.C. 20555; the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 
Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555; and the Executive Secretary, U.S. 
Department of State, Washington, D.C. 20520.
    The information concerning the application follows.

                                                                        

[[Page 62899]]
                                         NRC Import License Application                                         
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Name of applicant, Date of             Description of material                                               
   application, Date received,   ----------------------------------------       End use        Country of origin
       Application number            Material type      Total quantity                                          
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nuclear Sources & Services, Inc.  Low-level           940 cu. ft. (over   Management and      Mexico.           
Sept. 22, 1995                     radioactive waste.  5 yr.).             Disposal.                            
Oct. 18, 1995                                                                                                   
IW001                                                                                                           
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



    Dated this 28th day of November 1995 at Rockville, Maryland.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Ronald D. Hauber,
Director, Division of Nonproliferation, Exports and Multilateral 
Relations, Office of International Programs.
[FR Doc. 95-29816 Filed 12-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
#### H. C. BUCHAN, JR., t/a NORTH WILKESBORO HARDWARE and SPARTA HARDWARE, v. EUGENE SHAW, Commissioner of Revenue of North Carolina.

(Filed 4 November, 1953.)

Taxation § 88c: Declaratory Judgment Act § 1—

G.S. 105-267 provides the sole remedy of a taxpayer to determine his liability for a sales tax, and he may not maintain an action under the Declaratory Judgment Act to determine his liability therefor.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Clement, J.,*June Term, 1953, WilKes.

Civil action under the Declaratory Judgment Act to determine plaintiff’s tax liability under the sales tax statute.

Plaintiff is a licensed wholesale dealer and “sells a vast amount of merchandise to merchants for resale . . . outside of the State of North Carolina,” principally to licensed retail merchants of Virginia and Tennessee. He seeks a judgment adjudicating his tax liability on such sales. The defendant demurred for that the court has no jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action. The demurrer was sustained and judgment dismissing the action was duly entered. Plaintiff excepted and appealed.

*W. II. McElwee, Jr., for plaintiff appellant.*

*Attorney-General McMullan and Samuel Behrends, Jr., Member of Staff, for defendant appellee.*

*523Barnhill, J.

Ail action against tbe Commissioner of Revenue, in essence, is an action against tbe State. *Insurance Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Com.,*217 N.C. 495, 8 S.E. 2d 619. Since tbe State bas not waived its immunity against suit by one of its citizens under tbe Declaratory Judgment Act to adjudicate bis tax liability under tbe sales tax statute, tbe court properly sustained tbe demurrer. *Insurance Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Com., supra.*See also *Bunn v. Maxwell, Comr. of Revenue,*199 N.C. 557, 155 S.E. 250; *Rotan v. S.,*195 N.C. 291, 141 S.E. 733.

Plaintiff’s only remedy is provided by Gr.S. 105-267. He must follow tbe procedure there prescribed.

In any event, tbe question tbe plaintiff seeks to bave tbe court answer by declaratory judgment is put at rest in tbe opinion in *Phillips v. Shaw, ante,*p. 518, tbis day filed.

Tbe judgment entered in tbe court below is

Affirmed.
Exhibit 12.1

Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges  (amounts in thousands)

Year ended
December 31, 2008

Year ended
December 31, 2007(1)

Year ended
December 31, 2006(1)

Year ended December 31, 2005(1)

Period from
August 12, 2004
(Inception)
through
December 31,
2004(1)(Loss) earnings:(Loss) income before equity in income of unconsolidated affiliate and income tax expense

$
(1,077,601
)
$
205,000

$
120,868

$
69,777

$
(8,024
)Add: Fixed charges from below


564,614


617,504


430,384


107,792


21Total (loss) earnings before equity in income of unconsolidated affiliate, income tax expense and fixed charges

$
(512,987
)
$
822,504

$
551,252

$
177,569

$
(8,003
)Fixed charges:Interest expense(2)

$
564,614

$
617,504

$
430,384

$
107,792

$
21Total fixed charges

$
564,614

$
617,504

$
430,384

$
107,792

$
21Ratio of earnings to fixed charges


(3)


1.3x


1.3x


1.6x


(4)


---

---



QuickLinks