alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 34.5

 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board of Directors 

HSBC Electronic Data Processing (Philippines) Inc.:

 

We have examined management’s assessment, included in the accompanying “Report on Compliance With Applicable Servicing Criteria Pursuant To Item 1122 of Regulation AB Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934” (Exhibit 33.5) that HSBC Electronic Data Processing (Philippines) Inc. (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)(4)(viii) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB (the Applicable Servicing Criteria)applicable to the servicing of asset backed securitization transactions backed by auto loan receivables, as of and for the period from January 31, 2007 (date of issuance of the initial asset-backed securitization transaction covered by this report) through December 31, 2007.  Exhibit 33.5 identifies the individual asset-backed securitization transactions (the Covered Transactions) defined by management as part of theirassessment. Management has determined that all other criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) are not applicable to the Company’s activities with respect to the Covered Transactions.  Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment about the Company’s compliance based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)****and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Covered Transactions, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Covered Transactions, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.  Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by theCompany during the period covered by this report.  Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assessment that the Company complied with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the period from January 31, 2007 through December 31, 2007 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

 

Chicago, Illinois

March 3, 2008
Description of Restricted Stock Units



 Exhibit (10)(q) 
 DESCRIPTION OF RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS GRANTED TO ANDREW J. MCKENNA 
 In recognition of his responsibilities as
non-executive Chairman and upon the recommendation of the Governance Committee of the Board of Directors (“Board”) of McDonald’s Corporation (the “Company”), a Special Committee of the Board awarded Andrew J. McKenna a grant
of 14,388 restricted stock units (“RSUs”) on June 9, 2009, pursuant to authority delegated by the Board. Each RSU represents the right to receive, on the settlement date, one share of the Company’s common stock or, at the
Company’s discretion, cash equal to the fair market value thereof. The RSUs will be settled on the later of (i) one year from the date of grant or (ii) Mr. McKenna’s retirement from the Board. The RSUs will immediately be
settled upon Mr. McKenna’s death or if his service on the Board terminates because he becomes disabled. 
 Mr. McKenna also received previous
grants of RSUs, on the same terms as described herein, as follows: 14,222 RSUs in 2008, 17,000 RSUs in 2007, 15,000 RSUs in 2006 and 10,000 RSUs in 2005. The prior grants are disclosed in Exhibit 10(q) to Forms 10-Q filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 6, 2008 and August 6, 2007, respectively, and on Forms 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 31, 2006 and May 16, 2005, respectively.
Exhibit 15.1








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-153304 on Form F-3, No. 333-156843 on Form F-3 and No. 333-176922 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 23, 2012, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Star Bulk Carriers Corp. and subsidiaries (the "Company"), and the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2011.














/s/ Deloitte Hadjipavlou, Sofianos & Cambanis S.A.


Athens, Greece


March 23, 2012
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

.

Heinz Binder (SBN 87908)

Robert G. Harris (SBN 124678)

BINDER & MALTER, LLP

2775 Park Avenue

Santa Clara, CA 95050

Tel: (408) 295-1700

Fax: (408) 295-1531

Email: Heinz@bindermalter.com

Email: Rob@bindermalter.com

Attorneys for TURN, The Utility Reform Network

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re

PG&E CORPORATION

and

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY,

 Debtors.

Case Nos. 19-30088 DM (Lead Case)

 19-30089 DM

Chapter 11

Jointly Administered 

☐ Affects PG&E Corporation

☐ Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company

☒ Affects both Debtors

* All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case 

No. 19-30088 DM.

Date: December 11, 2019

Time: 10:00 a.m. 

Place: Courtroom 17

450 Golden Gate Avenue 

San Francisco, California 

DKT #4825

OBJECTION DEADLINE: December 4, 2019

JOINDER BY TURN IN THE PUBLIC ADVOCATES OFFICE'S STATEMENT OF 

POSITION OPPOSING DEBTORS' MOTION PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. § 1121(d) 

TO EXTEND THE EXCLUSIVE SOLICITATION PERIOD [DE 4825]

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4983 Filed: 12/04/19 Entered: 12/04/19 15:50:36 Page 1 of

2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 .

The Utility Reform Network (“TURN”) hereby joins in The Public Advocates Office's 

Statement of Position Opposing Debtors' Motion Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1121(d to Extend the 

Exclusive Solicitation Period. 

Dated: December 4, 2019 BINDER & MALTER, LLP

By: /s/ Robert G. Harris 

Robert G. Harris

 Attorneys for TURN, the Utility Reform Network 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4983 Filed: 12/04/19 Entered: 12/04/19 15:50:36 Page 2 of

2
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5555 

To prohibit the Federal Government from requiring race or ethnicity to 

be disclosed in connection with the transfer of a firearm. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 

Mrs. BLACK (for herself and Mr. POE of Texas) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Federal Government from requiring race 

or ethnicity to be disclosed in connection with the transfer of a firearm. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘FIREARM Act’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5555 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO 

2 REQUIRE RACE OR ETHNICITY TO BE DIS3 CLOSED IN CONNECTION WITH THE TRANS4 FER OF A FIREARM. 

5 The Federal Government may not require any person 

6 to disclose the race or ethnicity of the person in connection 

7 with the transfer of a firearm to the person. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)




In connection with the Annual Report of UTEC, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Howard Bouch, CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Howard BouchHoward Bouch CFODated: December 14, 2009
**Exhibit 4.1**

**SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE**

**DATED AS OF FEBRUARY 10, 2006**

**AMONG**

**KEYSTONE AUTOMOTIVEOPERATIONS, INC.,**

**THE GUARANTOR PARTY HERETO**

**AND**

**THE BANK OF NEW YORK,**

**AS TRUSTEE**

**9 3/4% SENIOR SUBORDINATED NOTES DUE 2013**

THIS SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE (this “Supplemental Indenture”), entered into as ofFebruary 10, 2006, among KEYSTONE AUTOMOTIVE OPERATIONS, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation (the “Company”), KEYSTONE AUTOMOTIVE DISTRIBUTORS COMPANY, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Undersigned”) and THE BANKOF NEW YORK, as trustee (the “Trustee”). 

**RECITALS**

WHEREAS, the Company, the Guarantors party thereto and the Trustee entered into the Indenture, dated as of October 30, 2003 (the“Indenture”), relating to the Company’s 9 3/4% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013 (the “Notes”); 

WHEREAS, as acondition to the Trustee entering into the Indenture and the purchase of the Notes by the Holders, the Company agreed pursuant to the Indenture to cause any newly acquired or created Domestic Restricted Subsidiaries, and certain other RestrictedSubsidiaries in certain circumstances, to provide Guarantees. 

**AGREEMENT**

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants herein contained and intending to be legally bound, the parties to thisSupplemental Indenture hereby agree as follows: 

Section 1. Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein are used asdefined in the Indenture. 

Section 2. The Undersigned, by its execution of this Supplemental Indenture, agrees to be a Guarantor under theIndenture and to be bound by the terms of the Indenture applicable to Guarantors, including, but not limited to, Article 11 thereof. 

Section 3. This Supplemental Indenture shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York. 

Section 4. This Supplemental Indenture may be signed in various counterparts which together will constitute one and the same instrument. 

Section 5. This Supplemental Indenture is an amendment supplemental to the Indenture and the Indenture and this Supplemental Indenture will henceforth be read together. 

Section 6. The recitals contained in this Supplemental Indenture shall be taken as the statements of the Company and the Guarantors, and the Trusteeassumes no responsibility for their correctness. The Trustee makes no representations as to the validity or sufficiency of this Supplemental Indenture. 

[Signature Page Follows] 

 

B-1 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Supplemental Indenture to be duly executed as ofthe date first above written. 

 

KEYSTONE AUTOMOTIVE OPERATIONS, INC.,

as Issuer
 By: 
/s/ Bryant Bynum
 
Name:
 
Bryant Bynum
 
Title:
 
Executive Vice President and
  
Chief Financial Officer

 
KEYSTONE AUTOMOTIVE DISTRIBUTORS COMPANY, LLC, as GuarantorBy: 
/s/ Bryant Bynum
 
Name:
 
Bryant Bynum
 
Title:
 
President and Treasurer

 
THE BANK OF NEW YORK, as TrusteeBy: 
/s/ Mary LaGumina
 
Name:
 
Mary LaGumina
 
Title:
 
Vice President

[Supplemental Indenture]
#### Henry Beidelman, by Guardian, Respondent, v. Timothy Liddy, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Opinion by

Boardman, J.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 and Rule 15d-14**

**of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934**

 

I, Brian T. McGee, certify that: 

 

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Lexar Media, Inc.; 

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.    The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c)    disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and; 

 

5.    The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a)    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b)    any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date:  November 9, 2004
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5446 

To amend the Credit Repair Organizations Act to exempt certain consumer 

reporting agencies, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 10, 2014 

Mr. ROYCE (for himself and Mr. HINOJOSA) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Credit Repair Organizations Act to exempt 

certain consumer reporting agencies, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Facilitating Access to 

5 Credit Act of 2014’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN CONSUMER REPORTING 

7 AGENCIES. 

8 The Credit Repair Organizations Act (15 U.S.C. 

9 1679 et seq.) is amended— 

10 (1) in section 403(3)(B)— 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5446 IH

1 (A) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the 

2 end; 

3 (B) in clause (iii), by striking the period 

4 and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

5 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(iv) any consumer reporting agen7 cy— 

8 ‘‘(I) described under section 

9 603(p) of the Fair Credit Reporting 

10 Act, or any affiliate or subsidiary of 

11 such a consumer reporting agency; or 

12 ‘‘(II) described under section 

13 603(f) of the Fair Credit Reporting 

14 Act, or any affiliate or subsidiary of 

15 such a consumer reporting agency, if 

16 such consumer reporting agency is 

17 subject to supervision and examina18 tion by the Bureau of Consumer Fi19 nancial Protection pursuant to section 

20 1024(a)(1)(B) of the Consumer Fi21 nancial Protection Act of 2010.’’; and 

22 (2) in section 412— 

23 (A) by striking ‘‘This title’’ and inserting 

24 the following: 

25 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—This title’’; and 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5446 IH

1 (B) by adding at the end the following: 

2 ‘‘(b) EXEMPTION FOR ENTITIES THAT ARE NOT

3 CREDIT REPAIR ORGANIZATIONS.—Notwithstanding sub4 section (a), this title supersedes any law or regulation of 

5 any State with respect to the subject matter of this Act 

6 to the extent that the State law or regulation would apply 

7 to any person described in section 403(3)(B).’’. 

8 SEC. 3. FTC STUDY. 

9 (a) STUDY.—The Federal Trade Commission shall 

10 conduct a study to determine whether, in addition to those 

11 persons listed under section 403(3)(B) of the Credit Re12 pair Organizations Act, any other person should be exempt 

13 from the Credit Repair Organizations Act. 

14 (b) REPORT.—Not later than one year after the date 

15 of enactment of this Act, the Chairman of the Federal 

16 Trade Commission shall submit a report to the Committee 

17 on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate 

18 and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of 

19 Representatives containing a detailed summary of the 

20 findings and conclusions of the study under this section, 

21 together with such recommendations for legislative or ad22 ministrative actions as may be appropriate. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Robert A. Julian

direct dial: 628.208.6436

rjulian@bakerlaw.com

BakerHostetler

1160 Battery Street, Suite 100

San Francisco, CA 94111

T: 628-208-6434

F: 310.820.8859

www.bakerlaw.com

October 22, 2019

VIA ECF

Honorable Dennis Montali

United States Bankruptcy Judge

450 Golden Gate Avenue, 16th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94102

Re: In re PG&E, Case No, 19-30088 (DM)

Your Honor:

At the October 7, 2019 estimation status conference, Judge Donato asked when he could expect 

the decision on the inverse briefing before this Court. 10/7/19 Hr’g Tr., at 26-27, attached hereto 

as Exhibit A. When we informed Judge Donato that the inverse issue is scheduled to be heard on 

December 11, 2019, he asked whether the schedule could be moved up. Id. We write to bring 

Judge Donato’s request to Your Honor’s attention and to propose a solution. 

The current briefing schedule is as follows: the Debtors’ brief is due on October 25, 2019, one 

opposition brief is due November 15, 2019, the Debtors’ reply is due on November 22, 2019, and 

a hearing will be held on December 11, 2019. In response to Judge Donato’s request, counsel for 

the TCC suggested to the Debtors that the parties revert to the original schedule that Your Honor 

had ordered on August 28, 2019: forego the hearing on December 11, 2019, and allow the matter 

to stand submitted after the opposition brief is filed on November 15, 2019. The Debtors did not 

agree with this suggestion. Accordingly, we ask Your Honor to consider the TCC’s potential 

solution to forego the hearing in order to expedite the inverse condemnation briefing schedule, or 

other possible means to address Judge Donato’s concern. We understand the Debtors’ counsel 

will address the issue separately.

Thank you for your time and attention to this matter.

Sincerely, 

/s/ Robert A. Julian

Robert A. Julian

encl. 

cc: All Parties via ECF

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4398 Filed: 10/22/19 Entered: 10/22/19 18:24:33 Page 1 of

1
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5441 

AN ACT 

To amend the Federal charter of the Veterans of Foreign 

Wars of the United States to reflect the service of women 

in the Armed Forces of the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5441 EH

1 SECTION 1. REFLECTION OF SERVICE OF WOMEN IN THE 

2 ARMED FORCES IN THE FEDERAL CHARTER 

3 OF THE VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF 

4 THE UNITED STATES. 

5 (a) ORGANIZATION.—Section 230101(a) of title 36, 

6 United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘men’’ and 

7 inserting ‘‘veterans’’. 

8 (b) PURPOSES.—Section 230102(3) of such title is 

9 amended by striking ‘‘widows’’ and inserting ‘‘surviving 

10 spouses’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 17, 

2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5441 

AN ACT 

To amend the Federal charter of the Veterans of 

United States. service of women in the Armed Forces of the Foreign Wars of the United States to reflect the
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5527 

To authorize the National Science Foundation to support entrepreneurial 

programs for women. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 

Ms. ESTY (for herself and Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science, 

Space, and Technology 

A BILL 

To authorize the National Science Foundation to support 

entrepreneurial programs for women. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Promoting Women in 

5 Entrepreneurship Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 The Congress finds that— 

8 (1) women make up almost 50 percent of the 

9 workforce, but less than 25 percent of the workforce 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 5527 IH

1 in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics 

2 (STEM) professions; 

3 (2) women are less likely to focus on the STEM 

4 disciplines in undergraduate and graduate study; 

5 (3) only 26 percent of women who do attain de6 grees in STEM fields work in STEM jobs; 

7 (4) there is an increasing demand for individ8 uals with STEM degrees to extend their focus be9 yond the laboratory so they can be leaders in dis10 covery commercialization; 

11 (5) studies have shown that technology and 

12 commercialization ventures are more successful when 

13 women are in top management positions; and 

14 (6) the National Science Foundation’s mission 

15 includes supporting women in STEM disciplines. 

16 SEC. 3. SUPPORTING WOMEN’S ENTREPRENEURIAL PRO17 GRAMS. 

18 Section 33 of the Science and Engineering Equal Op19 portunities Act (42 U.S.C. 1885a) is amended— 

20 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph 

21 (10); 

22 (2) by striking the period at the end of para23 graph (11) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

24 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

25 paragraph: 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•HR 5527 IH

1 ‘‘(12) support entrepreneurial programs that 

2 recruit and support women to extend their focus be3 yond the laboratory and into the commercial 

4 world.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS