alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BAKER 

&

HOSTETLER LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

LOS ANGELES

Robert A. Julian (SBN 88469)

Cecily A. Dumas (SBN 111449)

BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP

1160 Battery Street, Suite 100

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: 628.208.6434

Email: rjulian@bakerlaw.com

Email: cdumas@bakerlaw.com

Eric E. Sagerman (SBN 155496)

Lauren T. Attard (SBN 320898)

BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP

11601 Wilshire Boulevard

Suite 1400

Los Angeles, CA 90025

Telephone: 310.820.8800

Facsimile: 310.820.8859

Email: esagerman@bakerlaw.com

Email: lattard@bakerlaw.com

Counsel for Official Committee of Tort Claimants

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION

-andPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY,

Debtors

Case No. 19-30088 (DM)

Chapter 11

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

□ Affects PG& E Corporation

□ Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company

■ Affects both Debtors

*All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case, 

No. 19-30088 (DM)

APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF 

ATTORNEY JOSEPH M. ESMONT PRO 

HAC VICE

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3390 Filed: 08/06/19 Entered: 08/06/19 15:15:01 Page 1 of

2
.., "-

.., ;!: 

"'< 

~ r-l U} 

ti ~ ~ t;; Ul tj 0 >- Z 

:r:z< 

~ ~ ~ "',_. ..J "',_. 

~< 

""' 

1 Pursuant to B.L.R. 1001-2(a) and Civil L.R. 11-3, Joseph M. Esmont, an active member in 

2 good standing of the bar of the State of Ohio, the United States District Courts for the Northern 

3 District of Ohio and the Southern District of Ohio, hereby applies for admission to practice in the 

4 Northern District of California on a pro hac vice basis representing the Official Committee of Tort 

5 Claimants, in the above-entitled action. 

6 In support of this application, I certify on oath that: 

7 1. I am an active member in good standing of a United States Court or of the highest 

8 court of another State or the District of Columbia, as indicated above; 

9 2. I agree to abide by the Standards of Professional Conduct set forth in Civil 

10 LR 11-4, and agree to become familiar with the Local Rules and the Bankruptcy Dispute 

11 Resolution Program of this Court; and 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

3. An attorney who is a member of the bar of this Court in good standing and who 

maintains an office within the State of California has been designated as co-counsel in the aboveentitled action. The name and address and telephone number of that attorney is: 

Cecily A. Dumas 

Bak.er & Hostetler LLP 

1160 Battery Street, Suite 100 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: 628.208.6434 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

21 Dated: July 30, 2019 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-2-

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3390 Filed: 08/06/19 Entered: 08/06/19 15:15:01 Page 2 of

2
Order entered January 16, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00914-CR

CODY JOHN HOLT, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Court

Grayson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 062011

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s 

brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and 

recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether 

appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the 

trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 

(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is 

ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which 

may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include 

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this 

order.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The 

appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are 

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4838    Filed: 11/22/19    Entered: 11/22/19 10:21:30    Page 1 of2

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4838    Filed: 11/22/19    Entered: 11/22/19 10:21:30    Page 2 of2
EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit  99.1

                                  Certification


         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned officer of BigStar
Entertainment, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies
that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  September 5, 2002         /s/ DAVID FRIEDENSOHN
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                  Name:  David Friedensohn
                                  Title: Chief Executive Officer
                                  (chief executive and financial officer)



                                       16
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.13


                 AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 TO LANDA MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
                     CORPORATION 1998 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

Section 6(c) is hereby amended and replaced in its entirety as follows:

(c) EXERCISE PRICE OF A NONSTATUTORY STOCK OPTION. Subject to the provisions of
subsection 5(b) regarding Ten Percent Shareholders, the exercise price of each
Nonstatutory Stock Option granted prior to the Listing Date shall be not less
than one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value of the stock subject to
the Option on the date the Option is granted. The exercise price of each
Nonstatutory Stock Option granted on or after the Listing date shall be
determined by the Board or its Committee. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a
Nonstatutory Stock Option may be granted with an exercise price lower than that
set forth in the preceding sentence if such Option is granted pursuant to an
assumption or substitution for another option in a manner satisfying the
provisions of Section 424(a) of the Code.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 236 (Friday, December 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 63057]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-29962]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated August 10, 1995, and published in the Federal 
Register on August 17, 1995, (60 FR 42905), Noramco of Delaware, Inc., 
Division of McNeilab, Inc., 500 Old Swedes Landing Road, Wilmington, 
Delaware 19801, made application to the Drug Enforcement Administration 
(DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of 
controlled substances listed below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule         
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Codeine (9050).............................  II                         
Oxycodone (9143)...........................  II                         
Hydrocodone (9193).........................  II                         
Morphine (9300)............................  II                         
Thebaine (9333)............................  II                         
Alfentanil (9737)..........................  II                         
Fentanyl (9801)............................  II                         
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    No comments or objections have been reached. DEA has determined 
that the registration of Noramco of Delaware, Inc. to manufacture the 
listed controlled substances is consistent with the public interest at 
this time. Therefore, pursuant to Section 303 of the Comprehensive Drug 
Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970 and Title 21, Code of Federal 
Regulations, Section 1301.54(e), the Deputy Assistant Administrator, 
Office of Diversion Control, hereby orders that the application 
submitted by the above firm for registration as a bulk manufacturer of 
the basic classes of controlled substances listed above is granted.

    Dated: November 29, 1995.
Gene R. Haislip,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 95-29962 Filed 12-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (Item 1123)

Residential Funding Company, LLC

RFMSI Series 2007-S2 Trust (the Issuing Entity)

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Residential Funding Company, LLC, as servicer (the Servicer) pursuant to the Series Supplement, dated as of February 1, 2007, and the Standard Terms of Pooling and Servicing
Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2006 (as amended from time to time, the Agreement), among Residential Funding Mortgage Securities I, Inc., as company, Residential Funding Company, LLC, as master servicer, and U.S. Bank National
Association, as trustee, does hereby certify that:

1. A review of the Servicers activities during the period covered by the Issuing Entitys
report on Form 10-K and of the Servicers performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based
on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 24th day of March 2008.



|       |  |                     
|------ |  | --------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
|Name:  |  | Anthony N. Renzi    
|Title: |  | Managing Director
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**PERRY LAMONT WALLACE,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 120 MAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 15th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allow ance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**
EXHIBIT 11.1

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                                                                   THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                      JANUARY 31,
                                                                 2004                 2005
                                                              (UNAUDITED)          (UNAUDITED)
                                                           -------------------------------------
Numerator:
<S>                                                       <C>                      <C>
Net income (loss) from continuing operations                  $(1,606,099)             $414,793

Denominator:
Denominator for basic earnings per share- weighted-average
  shares                                                       12,865,977            13,835,870
Effect of dilutive securities:
Employee stock options and warrants                                      -              553,364
                                                           -------------------------------------

Denominator for diluted earnings per share adjusted
  weighted-average shares and assumed conversions
                                                               12,865,977            14,389,234

Basic and dilutive net (loss) earnings per share:

  Net basic and diluted (loss) earnings per
    share                                                          $(0.12)                $0.03


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.4**

 

**Certification**

 

I, Michael R. McFerran, certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A  of KKR Financial Holdings LLC; and

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

Date: Date: April 23, 2014

 
|   | /s/ MICHAEL R. MCFERRAN                                                                               |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |  

Michael R. McFerran

*Chief Financial Officer   (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)* |

 

----
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4045 Filed: 10/01/19 Entered: 10/01/19 13:44:36 Page 1 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4045 Filed: 10/01/19 Entered: 10/01/19 13:44:36 Page 2 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4045 Filed: 10/01/19 Entered: 10/01/19 13:44:36 Page 3 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4045 Filed: 10/01/19 Entered: 10/01/19 13:44:36 Page 4 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4045 Filed: 10/01/19 Entered: 10/01/19 13:44:36 Page 5 of

5
DOWNEY BRAND LLP

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

1567018.1 1

WITHDRAWAL OF NOTICE OF CONTINUED PERFECTION OF MECHANICS LIEN PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. § 546

DOWNEY BRAND LLP

Jamie P. Dreher (Bar No. 209380)

621 Capitol Mall, 18th Floor

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: (916) 444-1000

Facsimile: (916) 444-2100

Attorneys for

Teichert Pipelines, Inc. and A. Teichert & Sons, Inc. 

d/b/a Teichert Aggregates

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION

and

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY,

Debtors.

Case Nos.:

19-30088 (DM) – Lead Case

19-30089 (DM)

Chapter 11 Case

WITHDRAWAL OF DOCUMENT 

#3053 - NOTICE OF CONTINUED 

PERFECTION OF MECHANICS 

LIEN PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. § 

546(b)(2)

 Affects PG&E Corporation

 Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company

 Affect both Debtors

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Creditor, TEICHERT PIPELINES, Inc. 

("TEICHERT"), by and through its undersigned counsel, hereby withdraws the NOTICE 

OF CONTINUED PERFECTION OF MECHANICS LIEN PURSUANT TO 11 

U.S.C. § 546(B)(2), Docket #3053, which was e-filed with this court in the above-entitled 

action on July 18, 2019. The filing of this document was an inadvertent duplicate filing of 

the same document filed earlier as Docket #3048, which remains on file and in effect as 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3372 Filed: 08/05/19 Entered: 08/05/19 12:03:14 Page 1 of

2
DOWNEY BRAND LLP

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1567018.1 2

WITHDRAWAL OF NOTICE OF CONTINUED PERFECTION OF MECHANICS LIEN PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. § 546

filed.

DATED: August 5, 2019 DOWNEY BRAND LLP

By: /s/ Jamie P. Dreher

JAMIE P. DREHER

Attorney for

TEICHERT PIPELINES, INC. AND

A. TEICHERT & SONS, INC. D/B/A TEICHERT 

AGGREGATES

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3372 Filed: 08/05/19 Entered: 08/05/19 12:03:14 Page 2 of

2
Addendum to Employment Agreement - Dennis F. Strigl



 Exhibit 10d 
 ADDENDUM A 
 The following amendments are effective January 1, 2008: 
  

	1.	The following sentence is added to the end of Paragraph 12: 

 Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, if a gross-up payment is made on account of a separation from service, payment shall be made no earlier than the Severance Payment Date. 
  

	2.	Paragraphs 13(b)(1) and 13(e)(1) are amended by inserting in the first sentence of each the phrase “on the Severance Payment Date (as defined in subparagraph (h))” after
the phrase “payment to you.” 

  

	3.	Paragraphs 13(b)(2) and 13(e)(2) are amended by inserting in each paragraph the phrase “on the Severance Payment Date (as defined in subparagraph (h))” after the phrase
“lump-sum payment.” 

  

	4.	Paragraph 13 is amended by adding the following new subparagraphs (h) and (i): 

 (h)        Severance Payment Date – The Severance Payment Date is the earlier of (1) the first business day that occurs more than six (6) months after the
date you separate from service or (2) a date that occurs within 60 days following your death. 
 (i)        Termination of Employment – For purposes of the lump sum payments prescribed in paragraphs 13(b)(1), 13(b)(2), 13(e)(1) and 13(e)(2) (including a lump sum payment under
paragraph 13(e)(1) pursuant to paragraph 13(d)(3)), your employment shall be considered terminated on the date you incur a separation from service (within the meaning of Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-1(h)(1)) from Verizon Communications
Inc. and any entity required to be aggregated with Verizon Communications Inc. under Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-1(h)(3). 
  

	5.	Paragraph 14 is amended to replace the phrase “at the time your employment terminates” with the phrase “within sixty (60) days from the date that your employment
terminates.” 

  

	6.	The following sentence is added to the end of Paragraph 30: 

 This Agreement will be interpreted and construed in favor of it meeting the applicable requirements of section 409A of the Code, and any right to reimbursement of expenses or in-kind benefits that is not conditioned upon continued
employment is subject to the conditions required by Treas. Reg. § 1.409A-3(i)(1)(iv); provided that this sentence does not transfer to the Company or any entity or other individual liability for any tax or penalty that is your responsibility.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Frank, Huff and Senior Judge Haley 

FOOD LION, LLC AND 

 DELHAIZE AMERICA, INC. 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 0323-14-2 PER CURIAM 

 JUNE 24, 2014 

TIMOTHY GORDE 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (Brian A. Richardson; Lindsey A. Strachan; McCandlish Holton, PC, 

on briefs), for appellants. 

 (Timothy Gorde, pro se, on brief). 

 Food Lion, LLC and Delhaize America, Inc. appeal a decision of the Workers’ 

Compensation Commission finding that Timothy Gorde sustained a compensable injury arising 

out of his employment and was entitled to lifetime medical benefits and temporary total 

disability benefits. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this 

appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its 

final opinion. See Gorde v. Food Lion, LLC, VWC File No. VA00000251540 (Jan. 24, 2014). 

We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. 

 Affirmed. 

 *

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. 

UNPUBLISHED
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5391 

To direct the Architect of the Capitol to place a chair on the grounds 

of the United States Capitol honoring American Prisoners of War/Missing 

in Action. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 1, 2014 

Mr. LYNCH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To direct the Architect of the Capitol to place a chair on 

the grounds of the United States Capitol honoring American Prisoners of War/Missing in Action. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National POW/MIA 

5 Remembrance Act of 2014’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds the following: 

8 (1) In recent years, commemorative chairs hon9 oring American Prisoners of War/Missing in Action 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5391 IH

1 have been placed in prominent locations across the 

2 United States. 

3 (2) The grounds of the United States Capitol 

4 are an appropriate location to place a commemora5 tive chair honoring American Prisoners of War/Miss6 ing in Action. 

7 SEC. 3. PLACEMENT OF A CHAIR ON GROUNDS OF UNITED 

8 STATES CAPITOL HONORING AMERICAN 

9 PRISONERS OF WAR/MISSING IN ACTION. 

10 (a) OBTAINING CHAIR.—The Architect of the Capitol 

11 shall enter into an agreement to obtain a chair featuring 

12 the logo of the National League of POW/MIA Families 

13 under such terms and conditions as the Architect con14 siders appropriate and consistent with applicable law. 

15 (b) PLACEMENT.—Not later than 2 years after the 

16 date of enactment of this Act, the Architect shall place 

17 the chair obtained under subsection (a) on the grounds 

18 of the United States Capitol in a suitable permanent loca19 tion. 

20 SEC. 4. FUNDING. 

21 (a) DONATIONS.—The Architect of the Capitol 

22 may— 

23 (1) enter into an agreement with any organiza24 tion described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal 

25 Revenue Code of 1986 that is exempt from taxation 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5391 IH

1 under section 501(a) of that Code to solicit private 

2 donations to carry out the purposes of this Act; and 

3 (2) accept donations of funds, property, and 

4 services to carry out the purposes of this Act. 

5 (b) COSTS.—All costs incurred in carrying out the 

6 purposes of this Act shall be paid for with private dona7 tions received under subsection (a). 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Order filed October 27 , 2022



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________
No. 11

- 2 2

- 00 218

- C R

__________
EDDIE DALE UNDERWOOD , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 259 th District Court
Jones County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 6880

- D

O R D E R

We have reviewed the “Motion to Recus e App ellate Judges ” filed in this cause

on October 18, 2022
, as it pertains to seeking the recusal of Justice W. Stacy Trotter

. Pursuant to Rule 16.3(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, Justice Trotter

has considered the motion in chambers. Justice Trotter has found no reason to
recuse himself and, pursuant to Rule 16.3(b), has certified the issue to the entire
court for a determination by the other justices of this court. 1 See T EX

. R.

1 A copy of Justice Trotter ’s written certification is attached to this order.2 A PP

. P. 16.3(b). Chief Justice John M. Bailey and Justice W. Bruce Wi lliams have

decided the matter without Justice Trotter ’s participation

. The recusal of appellate court justices is controlled by Rule 16 of the Texas
Rules of Appellate Procedure. The grounds for recusal of an appellate court justice

are provided in the T exas Rules of Civil Procedure. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 16.2; see

T EX

. R. C IV

. P . 18b. We find no reason for Justice Trotter to recuse himself and hold that none of the grounds set out in Rule 18b are applicable to Justice Trotter in

this case. See T EX

. R. C IV

. P . 18b ; see also Manges v. Guerra , 673 S.W.2d 180,

185 (Tex. 1984); McCullough v. Kitzman , 50 S.W.3d 87, 88 (Tex. App.

— Waco 2001, pet. denied).
The request for the recusal of Justice W. Stacy Trotter is denied.

PER CURIAM

October 27 , 202 2 Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Bailey, C. J., and Williams , J.

Trotter , J., not participating.
#### Lizzie A. Miller, Appellant, v. Eliza W. Parkhurst, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by

Daniels, J.