alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 571 

To suspend United States assistance to Brazil until such time as Brazil 

amends its laws to remove the prohibition on extradition of nationals 

of Brazil to other countries. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2013 

Mr. RYAN of Ohio (for himself and Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To suspend United States assistance to Brazil until such 

time as Brazil amends its laws to remove the prohibition 

on extradition of nationals of Brazil to other countries. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Karl Hoerig Foreign 

5 Aid Suspension Act’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 571 IH

1 SEC. 2. SUSPENSION OF UNITED STATES ASSISTANCE TO 

2 BRAZIL UNTIL BRAZIL AMENDS ITS LAWS TO 

3 REMOVE THE PROHIBITION ON EXTRADITION 

4 OF NATIONALS OF BRAZIL TO OTHER COUN5 TRIES. 

6 (a) SUSPENSION OF ASSISTANCE.—Notwithstanding 

7 any other provision of law, no funds made available to any 

8 Federal department or agency may be used to provide as9 sistance to Brazil until the President determines and cer10 tifies to Congress that the Government of Brazil has 

11 amended its laws to remove the prohibition on extradition 

12 of nationals of Brazil to other countries. 

13 (b) WAIVER.—The President may waive the applica14 tion of subsection (a) on a case-by-case basis if the Presi15 dent determines and certifies to Congress that is in the 

16 national interests of the United States to do so. 

17 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This Act takes effect on the 

18 date of the enactment of this Act and applies with respect 

19 to funds made available to any Federal department or 

20 agency for any fiscal year after fiscal year 2013. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

June 23, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135638 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 135638 

 COA: 278523 

Wayne CC: 02-011705-01

JORGE ANTONIO IBARRA-PEREZ, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 14, 2007 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s0616 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 23, 2008 

 Clerk
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL JAMES HICKS,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

M. BOBBALLA; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 15

- 17255

D.C. No. 2:15

- cv

- 01332

- EFB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Edmund F. Brennan, Magistrate Judge, Presiding **

Submitted February 14, 2017 ***

Before: GOODWIN, FARRIS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges

.

California state prisoner Michael James Hicks appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment denying him leave to proceed in forma pauperis in his 42

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28

U.S.C. § 636(c).

*** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

FEB 24 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER , CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 15

- 17255

U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations in connection with his

medical treatment. We h ave jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de

novo the district court’s interpretation and application of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g),

Andrews v. Cervantes , 493 F.3d 1047, 1052 (9th Cir. 2007), and for an abuse of

discretion its denial of leave to proceed in forma pauperis, O’Loughlin v. Doe , 920

F.2d 614, 616 (9th Cir. 1990). We reverse and remand.

The district court improperly denied Hicks’ request to proceed in forma

pauperis because Hicks made plausible allegations that he was “under imminent

danger o f serious physical injury” at the time he lodged the complaint , including

that the inadequate physical therapy he received caused paraly sis in his left arm

and his prescribed pain medication put s him at heightened risk for liver disease

because he suffers from hepatitis C . 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); see also Andrews , 493

F.3d at 1055 (an exception to the three

- strikes rule exists “if the complaint makes a

plausible allegation that the prisoner faced ‘imminent danger of serious physical

injury’ at the time of fil ing”).

REVERSED and REMANDED.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5213 Filed: 12/15/19 Entered: 12/27/19 14:11:17 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5213 Filed: 12/15/19 Entered: 12/27/19 14:11:17 Page 2 of

2
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 70030

DUANE EDWARD BUCK , Petitioner

– Appellant , versus LOR I E DAVIS, Director, Texas Department o f Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division , Respondent

– Appellee

.

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before SMITH , OWEN , and HAYNES , Circuit Judges

. P ER CURIAM :

This court denied a certificate of appealability (“COA”) to review the denial of petitioner Duane Buck’s motion , filed per Federal Rule of Civil Pro

ce dure 60(b)(6) , claiming violation of his Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel. Buck v. Stephens , 623 F. App’x 668 (5th Cir. 2015). The Supreme Court reversed and remanded , Buck v. Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 780 (2017), “conclud[ing] that Buck has demonstrated both ineffective assistance United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 13, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-70030 Document: 00513951562 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/13/2017No. 14

- 70030

2 of counsel . . . and an entitlement to relief under Rule 60(b)(6)” and that this court “erred in denying Buck the COA required to pursue those claims on appeal.” On remand, we requested briefing on what action this court should take. Helpfully, the parties submitted a joint letter brief, agreeing on what action is appropriate.
There are no remaining matters requiring resolution by this court or the
district court except as set forth below . The motion for a COA is GRANTED. The judgment is VACATED in regard to ineffective assistance of counsel at the punishment phase . This matter is REMANDED with direction to grant , condi

tionally, a writ of habeas corpus and to direct the respondent to release peti

tioner f rom custody unless, within 180 days of the date of the district court’s order on remand, the state either (1) initiates proceeding for a new trial on the issue of punishment only, per Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Arti

cle 44.29(c), or (2) elects not to seek the death penalty and accedes to a life

sentence. Case: 14-70030 Document: 00513951562 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/13/2017
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5687 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 101 East Market Street in Long Beach, California, as the ‘‘Juanita Millender-McDonald Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5687 EH

1 SECTION 1. JUANITA MILLENDER-MCDONALD POST OF2 FICE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 101 East Market Street in Long 

5 Beach, California, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Juanita Millender-McDonald Post Office’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in section 1 shall be 

10 deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Juanita Millender11 McDonald Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 8, 

2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5687 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostMillender-McDonald Post Office’’. Long Beach, California, as the ‘‘Juanita al Service located at 101 East Market Street in
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), the
undersigned sole director of S Wind-up Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter year ended September 30, 2005, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the Periodic
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Periodic
Report and results of operations for the Company for periods covered by the Periodic Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ IRV LICHTENWALDName:

Irv LichtenwaldTitle:

DirectorDated:

November 3, 2005




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to S Wind-up Corporation (the Company) and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or its staff upon request. This
certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 20 (Monday, February 1, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 5106]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-01850]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Friday, February 5, 2016.

PLACE: Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street NW., Washington, DC, 
9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance, enforcement, and examinations 
matters. In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting 
changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, 
and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's Web site 
at http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Christopher Kirkpatrick, 202-418-
5964.

Natise Allen,
Executive Assistant.
[FR Doc. 2016-01850 Filed 1-28-16; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-22-00083-CV

Caddo Mills Independent School District and

Mike Morath, Commissioner of Education, Appellants

v.

Steven Sumrow, Appellee

FROM THE 200TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. D-1-GN-20-001907, THE HONORABLE AMY CLARK MEACHUM, JUDGE PRESIDING

C O N C U R R I N G O P I N I O N 

I agree with the Court’s analysis and its conclusion that the language of the 

contract requires us to affirm the Commissioner’s order. I write separately to express my view 

that the school district’s abrupt change in its course of dealing with an educator who had been 

employed by the district for 15 years in the same position, absent any cause, is the type of unfair 

surprise that borders on being unconscionable. While there may be legitimate reasons justifying 

the inclusion of the term allowing reassignment, the school district’s execution of the 

reassignment here, which it attempted to justify by requiring an additional certification that had 

not previously been required, is disturbing.

__________________________________________

Gisela D. Triana, Justice
2

Before Justices Baker, Triana, and Jones 

Filed: July 12, 2023
GMAC RFC



                 SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (Item 1123)

                      Residential Funding Company, LLC

      HSI Asset Loan Obligation Trust 2007-AR1 (the "Issuing Entity")



The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Residential Funding Company,
LLC, as servicer (the "Servicer") pursuant to the applicable servicing
agreement, does hereby certify that:

1.    A review of the Servicer's activities during the period covered by the
Issuing Entity's report on Form 10-K and of the Servicer's performance under
the applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.

2.    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in
all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this
14th day of March 2008




By:  /s/Anthony N. Renzi
     ----------------------------------
     Name: Anthony N. Renzi
     Title: Managing Director
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

IN RE: PHILLIP M. ADAMS, Appellant

______________________

2022

- 1705

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 15/412,696.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

A LMA J OHN P ATE

, Pate Nelson & Hill, Salt Lake City,UT, argued for appellant Phillip M. Adams. Also repres ented by G ORDON K. H ILL

.

M AI -T RANG D UC D ANG

, Office of the Solicitor, U nitedStates Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Katherine K. Vidal. Also represented by

B ENJAMIN T. H ICKMAN

, T HOMAS W. K RAUSE

, A MY J.

N ELSON

, F ARHEENA Y ASMEEN R ASHEED

.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED : Case: 22-1705 Document: 31 Page: 1 Filed: 04/11/2023P ER C URIAM (P ROST

, W ALLACH

, and C HEN

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

April 11 ,2023
Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court Case: 22-1705 Document: 31 Page: 2 Filed: 04/11/2023
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lionbridge Technologies, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Rory J. Cowan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Donald M. Muir, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 9, 2007



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ RORY J. COWAN      
|Rory J. Cowan          
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|/s/ DONALD M. MUIR     
|Donald M. Muir         
|Chief Financial Officer
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document




































 



 
 

  Exhibit 10.2    
    


 
 

  CROCS, INC.    
    
    Board of Directors Compensation Plan    
    


        On June 25, 2009, the Board of Directors of Crocs, Inc. (the "Company") approved a new compensation arrangement for non-employee
directors effective as of June 25, 2009. The new compensation arrangement provides the following for non-employee directors: 



        (a)   Annual
compensation for each non-employee director of, at the election of such non-employee director, (i) $80,000 in cash payable in four successive quarterly
payments, (ii) $80,000 of restricted stock of the Company based on the fair market value of the Company's common stock on the date of grant, which restricted stock will vest in four successive
quarterly installments from the date of grant, or (iii) a combination thereof; 


        (b)   Additional
annual compensation for the chairperson of the Audit Committee of, at such chairperson's election, (i) $50,000 in cash, (ii) $50,000 of
restricted stock of the Company based on the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant, which restricted stock will vest in four successive quarterly installments from the date of
grant, or (iii) a combination thereof; 


        (c)   Additional
annual compensation for the chairpersons of each of the Governance and Nominating Committee and the Compensation Committee of, at such chairperson's election,
(i) $5,000 in cash, (ii) $5,000 of restricted stock of the Company based on the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant, which restricted stock will vest in four equal
quarterly installments from the date of grant, or (iii) a combination thereof; 


        (d)   Annual
grant to each non-employee director of $100,000 of common stock of the Company based on the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant; 



        (e)   Annual
grant to the Chairman of the Board of options to purchase 10,000 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the
common stock on the date of grant, which options will vest in four equal annual installments on the date of the annual meeting of stockholders each year; and 


        (f)    Any
additional cash compensation payable to any of the non-employee directors, at the discretion of the Board of Directors. 












QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.2


CROCS, INC. Board of Directors Compensation Plan
#### Alexander H. Dudley, Appellant, v. Matthew V. B. Brinkerhoff, Respondent.

Order refusing to dismiss appeal denied and judgment reversed, with costs. Opinion by

Dykman, J.
Amendment to the Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. Phantom Stock Plan



 Exhibit 10.19.4 
 2009 DECLARATION OF AMENDMENT TO 
 PHANTOM STOCK PLAN 
 THIS 2009 DECLARATION OF AMENDMENT, is made effective as of the 18th day of May, 2009 by Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (the “Company”), to
the Company’s Phantom Stock Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2009 (the “Plan”). 
 R  E  C  I  T  A  L  S: 
 WHEREAS, the Board of
Directors of the Company has deemed it advisable to amend Section 2.13 of the Plan to permit the Administrator to establish the Fair Market Value of the Company’s Common Stock by any method the Administrator determines in good faith,
including based on the weighted average of the closing prices of the Company’s common stock on the first, second and third trading days immediately preceding the valuation date; 
 WHEREAS, the Company desires to evidence such amendment by this Declaration of Amendment. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS DECLARED that upon approval of this Declaration of Amendment by the Board of Directors on May 18, 2009, the Plan shall be and
hereby is amended as follows: 
 1. Amendment to Section 2.13. Section 2.13 (“Fair Market Value”) of the Plan is
hereby amended by deleting in its entirety Section 2.13 of the Plan in its current form and substituting therefor the following: 
 2.13. “Fair Market Value” of a share of Common Stock as of a given date shall be established in good faith by the Administrator. The Administrator may use in its discretion (i) the weighted average of the closing
prices of a share of Common Stock (on the principal exchange on which shares of Common Stock are then trading) on the first, second and third trading days immediately preceding such date, or (ii) the closing price of a share of Common Stock on
such exchange on the trading day immediately preceding such date, or (iii) any other method as the Administrator may determine in good faith. 
 2. Continued Effect. Except as set forth herein, the Plan shall be unchanged and shall remain in full force and effect. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Declaration of Amendment is executed on behalf of Old Dominion Freight Line,
Inc. effective as of the day and year first above written. 
  

			
	OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC.
		
	BY:	 	 /s/ David S. Congdon

		 	David S. Congdon
		 	President and Chief Executive Officer


  

	
	ATTEST:
	
	 /s/ Joel B. McCarty, Jr.

	Joel B. McCarty, Jr.
	Secretary

 [Corporate Seal]
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly report of PSPP Holdings, Inc.
on Form 10-QSB, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Larry Wilcox, Chief Executive Officer
(or equivalent thereof) and Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent thereof)
of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                              /s/ Larry Wilcox
                              -------------------------
                              Larry Wilcox
                              Chief Executive Officer (or equivalent thereof)
                              February 1, 2007
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 28, 2021

NO. 03-19-00775-CR

Thomas Ritchie McBride, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 27TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES BAKER AND TRIANA

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the judgment entered by the trial court on October 3, 2019. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. Because 

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.