alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

_________________ NO. 09

- 1 4

- 00 201

- CR

_________________ BRUCE WAYNE HARP , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 253rd District Court Liberty County, Texas Trial Cause No. CR30 729

_________________________________________________________________ _ MEMORANDUM OPINION
A jury found appellant Bruce Wayne Harp guilty of continuous sexual abuse

of a child and assessed punishment at thirty

- five years imprisonment with the
Texas Department of Criminal Justice’s Institutional Division

. Harp timely filed a
notice of appeal.

Harp ’s appellate counsel filed an Anders brief. See Anders v. California , 386

U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.]

1978). Counsel’s brief presents his professional evaluation of the record and2 concludes there are no arguable grounds t o be advanced in this appeal. Counsel
provided Harp wit h a copy of th e brief. We granted an extension of time for Harp
to file a pro se brief. Harp filed a pro se brief raising a number of issues on appeal.
The appellate court need not address the merits of issues raised in Anders
briefs or pro se responses. Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826

– 27 (Tex. Crim.

App. 2005). In these circumstances, we “may determine that the appeal is wholly
frivolous and issue an opinion explaining that [the appellate court] has reviewed

the record and finds no reversible error. Or, [we] may determine that arguable
grounds for appeal exist and remand the cause to the trial court so that new counsel
may be appointed to brief the issues.” Id. (citations omitted).

We have i ndependently reviewed the clerk’s record and the reporter’ s
record, and we agree with Harp ’s appellate counsel that no arguable issues support
an appeal. See id. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new

counsel to re

- brief Harp ’s appeal. See id. ; c f

. Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503,

511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court ’ s judgment. 1

1 Harp may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.3 AFFIRMED.

_____________________________ CHARLES KREGER Justice

Submitted on September 8 , 20 1 5 Opinion Delivered D ecember 9, 2015 Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger, and Johnson
, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5699 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5699

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire approximately 44 
     acres of land in Martinez, California, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

     This Act may be cited as the ``John Muir National Historic Site 
Expansion Act''.

SEC. 2. JOHN MUIR NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE LAND ACQUISITION.

    (a) Acquisition.--The Secretary of the Interior may acquire by 
donation the approximately 44 acres of land, and interests in such 
land, that are identified on the map entitled ``John Muir National 
Historic Site Proposed Boundary Expansion'', numbered 426/127150, and 
dated November, 2014.
    (b) Boundary.--Upon the acquisition of the land authorized by 
subsection (a), the Secretary of the Interior shall adjust the 
boundaries of the John Muir Historic Site in Martinez, California, to 
include the land identified on the map referred to in subsection (a).
    (c) Administration.--The land and interests in land acquired under 
subsection (a) shall be administered as part of the John Muir National 
Historic Site established by the Act of August 31, 1964 (Public Law 88-
547; 78 Stat. 753; 16 U.S.C. 461 note).
    (d) Date Certain.--The authority provided in subsections (a), (b), 
and (c) shall apply only if the lands identified on the map entitled 
``John Muir National Historic Site Proposed Boundary Expansion'' are 
held in title by the Muir Heritage Land Trust by May 31, 2015.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 11, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5699

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire approximately 44 
     acres of land in Martinez, California, and for other purposes.
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 26, 2021

t0323 

# Order

Clerk March 26, 2021

161348 & (49) (50 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 161348

COA: 346885

Chippewa CC: 18

- 003454

- FH

KENNETH THOMAS McCLELLAN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion to withdraw the application for leave to appeal

is GRANTED, and the application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and

without costs.
Filed by sedaredgar.com - Bark Group Inc. - Exhibit 10.1






BARK GROUP INC. 
Ostergade 17-19,
3rd Floor, DK-1100 Copenhagen K, Denmark


August 01, 2009 

TO THE ORIGINAL SHAREHOLDERS OF BARK GROUP INC. 

Dear Sirs/Mesdames: 

	
      Re: 
	
      Repurchase and lock-up agreements entered into between
      Bark Group Inc. (“Bark Group”, formerly Exwal Inc.) and the
      original shareholders of Bark Group 



We write to advise you that we have determined to terminate and
release from you from your obligations pursuant to the repurchase and lock-up
agreement entered into between Bark Group and yourself as an original
shareholder of Bark Group (the “Repurchase and Lock-Up Agreement”), as
amended on July 14, 2009 and April 3, 2009. Accordingly, we confirm that: 

	
  Bark Group no longer has any right to repurchase your shares of Bark Group
  under the Repurchase and Lock-Up Agreement, and 

  
	
  You may resell your shares of Bark Group without reference to the lock-up
  agreement originally provided for in the Repurchase and Lock-Up Agreement,
  provided that you comply with all applicable securities laws in completing any
  resale of your shares. 



Yours truly, 

BARK GROUP INC. 

/s/ Bent Helvang 

Per:

Bent Helvang, Chairman
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                      SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18
                           OF THE UNITED STATES CODE,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of ADVANCED 3-D  ULTRASOUND  SERVICES,
INC.  f/k/a YSEEK,  Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"),  I, David  Weintraub,  Chief Executive  Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ David Weintraub

-----------------------------------
David Weintraub
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
April 29, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 234 (Wednesday, December 6, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 62477]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-29675]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Continuous Biocatalytic Systems for the 
Production of Chemicals From Renewable Resources

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 15, 1995, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Genencor 
International, Inc. filed notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the 
identities of the parties to and (2) the nature and objectives of the 
joint venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to Section 6(b) 
of the Act, the identities of the parties to the joint venture are 
Genencor International, Inc., Rochester, NY; Eastman Chemical Company, 
Kingsport, TN; ElectroSynthesis Company, Inc., Lancaster, NY; 
MicroGenomics, Inc., Somerville, NJ; and Argonne National laboratory, 
Argonne, IL. The objective of the joint venture is to explore 
economically viable biocatalytic systems for the production of various 
chemicals from renewable agricultural resources, including corn and 
other carbohydrate-rich plant materials. The biocatalytic systems are 
intended to be continuous as opposed to the more costly batch mode 
currently employed in biocatalysis, significantly reducing the amount 
of time required to achieve competitive process economics. If 
successful, the project could result in reducing the nation's reliance 
on imported petroleum and benefiting the U.S. chemical and chemical-
consuming industries.
Constance, K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 95-29675 Filed 12-5-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5688 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5688

  To impose special limitations on the issuance of visas to, and the 
admission into the United States of, aliens having certain associations 
with countries with widespread and intense transmissions of Ebola Virus 
                                Disease.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 12, 2014

Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas (for himself and Mr. Marchant) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To impose special limitations on the issuance of visas to, and the 
admission into the United States of, aliens having certain associations 
with countries with widespread and intense transmissions of Ebola Virus 
                                Disease.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Ebola Act''.

SEC. 2. SPECIAL IMMIGRATION LIMITATIONS RELATING TO EBOLA VIRUS 
              DISEASE.

    (a) In General.--
            (1) Visa restrictions.--Beginning on the date of the 
        enactment of this Act, no consular officer may issue an 
        immigrant or nonimmigrant visa to any alien who is a citizen or 
        national of any affected country.
            (2) Admission restrictions.--Beginning on the date of the 
        enactment of this Act, an alien is ineligible to be admitted 
        into the United States if the alien's journey to the United 
        States originated in, or included transit through, any affected 
        country.
    (b) Affected Country Defined.--For purposes of this section, the 
term ``affected country'' means a country that has been designated by 
the World Health Organization as having ``widespread and intense 
transmissions'' under the World Health Organization Ebola Response 
Roadmap.
    (c) Other Definitions.--Except as provided in subsection (b), the 
terms used in this section shall have the meaning given such terms in 
section 101(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1101(a)).
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TYREEK WILSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 115 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 20th day of September, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 238 (Tuesday, December 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 63735]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30158]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-30,329A; TA-W-30, 329D; TA-W-30, 329E]


United Technologies Corporation, Pratt & Whitney East Hartford, 
Connecticut, et al.; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department of Labor issued an Amended Certification Regarding 
Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on February 22, 
1995, applicable to all workers of Pratt & Whitney, East Hartford, 
Connecticut engaged in employment related to the production of jet 
engine parts. The notice was published in the Federal Register on March 
1, 1995 (60 FR 11119).
    At the request of two State Agencies, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. New findings show that 
state field representatives for the subject firm located in Florida and 
Michigan, were paid by the subject firm and should have been included 
in the certification. The intent of the Department's certification is 
to include all workers of Pratt & Whitney who were adversely affected 
by increased imports.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-30,329 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of United Technologies Corporation, Pratt & Whitney, 
East Hartford, Connecticut (TA-W-30,329A); and field representatives 
located in Florida (TA-W-30,329D) and Michigan (TA-W-30,329E) whose 
wages were paid by Pratt & Whitney, East Hartford Connecticut, 
engaged in employment related to the production of jet engine parts 
who became totally or partially separated from employment on or 
after September 7, 1993 are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 28th day of November 1995.
Russell T. Kile,
Acting Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-30158 Filed 12-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CertificationPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

 

 

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,United States Code), each of the undersigned does hereby certify that:

 

The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004(the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and informationcontained in the Form10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|              |  /s/ David M. Thomas                          |   |
|-------------------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date: May 3, 2004 | David M. Thomas                                    |
|              | Chairman and  Chief Executive Officer              |
|              |                                               |
|              |                                               |
|              |  /s/ Nancy E. Cooper                          |   |
| Date: May 3, 2004 | Nancy E. Cooper                                    |
|              | Senior Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

The foregoing certification is beingfurnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not beingfiled as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to IMS Health Incorporated and will be retained by IMS HealthIncorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 and Rule 15d-14**

**of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934**

 

I, Brian T. McGee, certify that: 

 

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Lexar Media, Inc.; 

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.    The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c)    disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and; 

 

5.    The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a)    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b)    any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date:  August 9, 2004
#### Florence B. Berwanger, Respondent, v. Louis Salomon, Appellant.

Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs. No opinion.

Jenks, P. J., Hirsehberg, Burr, Thomas and Carr, JJ., concurred.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DOCUMENT PREPARED

ON RECYCLED PAPER

REBECCA J. WINTHROP (CA Bar No. 116386)

ROBIN BALL (CA Bar No. 159698)

NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLP

555 South Flower Street, Forty-First Floor

Los Angeles, California 90071

Telephone: (213) 892-9200

Facsimile: (213) 892-9494

rebecca.winthrop@nortonrosefulbright.com

robin.ball@nortonrosefulbright.com

Counsel for ADVENTIST HEALTH 

SYSTEM/WEST and FEATHER RIVER 

HOSPITAL D/B/A ADVENTIST HEALTH 

FEATHER RIVER

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION,

- and -

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY

Debtors.

Case No. 19 - 30088 (DM)

Chapter 11

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION 

BY AND AMONG THE ADVENTIST 

HEALTH CLAIMANTS, THE DEBTORS, 

AND THE AD HOC GROUP OF 

SUBROGATION CLAIM HOLDERS TO 

RESOLVE ADVENTIST HEALTH 

CLAIMANTS’ OBJECTION TO 

SUBROGATION SETTLEMENT AND 

RSA MOTION [DE # 3992]

 Affects PG&E Corporation

 Affects Pacific Gas and Electric 

Company

 Affects both Debtors

* All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case, 

No. 19-30088 (DM).

[No Hearing Date Requested]

Signed and Filed: December 19, 2019

________________________________________

DENNIS MONTALI

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

Entered on Docket 

December 19, 2019

EDWARD J. EMMONS, CLERK 

U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5172 Filed: 12/19/19 Entered: 12/19/19 14:20:45 Page 1 of

2
99106274.2 - 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DOCUMENT PREPARED

ON RECYCLED PAPER

The Court, having considered the Stipulation By and Among the Adventist Health 

Claimants, the Debtors, and the Ad Hoc Group of Subrogation Claim Holders to Resolve the 

Adventist Health Claimants’ Objection to Subrogation Settlement and RSA Motion [DE # 3992]

filed on December 17, 2019 [DE # 5153] (the “Stipulation”), and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation is approved. 

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND 

CONTENT:

Dated: December 17, 2019

NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLP

By: /s/ Rebecca J. Winthrop

REBECCA J. WINTHROP

Counsel for ADVENTIST HEALTH 

SYSTEM/WEST and FEATHER RIVER 

HOSPITAL D/B/A ADVENTIST 

HEALTH FEATHER RIVER

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND 

CONTENT:

Dated: December 17, 2019

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP

KELLER & BENVENUTTI LLP

By: /s/ Matthew P. Goren

MATTHEW P. GOREN

Counsel for the Debtors and Debtors in 

Possession

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND 

CONTENT:

Dated: December 17, 2019

WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER LLP

DIEMER & WEI LLP

By: __/s/ Matthew A. Feldman_________

 MATTHEW A. FELDMAN

Counsel for the Ad Hoc Group of 

Subrogation Claim Holders

***END OF ORDER***

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5172 Filed: 12/19/19 Entered: 12/19/19 14:20:45 Page 2 of

2
Exhibit 23.1





INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM’S
CONSENT








We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement of ChromaDex Corporation and Subsidiaries on Form S-3 and
as amended [File No. 333-233729, File No. 333-222064, File No.
333-221245, File No. 333-218634 and File No. 333-176636] and on
Form S-8 [File No. 333-226972, File No. 333-223889, File No.
333-221247, File No. 333-221246, File No. 333-196434, File No.
333-168029, File No. 333-154403 and File No. 333-154402] of our
report
relating to the effectiveness of the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting dated March 10, 2020 (May 18, 2020
as to the effects of the material weakness described in
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting (As Revised)), appearing in this Annual Report on Form
10-K/A of ChromaDex Corporation and Subsidiaries for the year ended
December 31, 2019.





/s/
Marcum llp





Marcum
llp


New
York, NY


May 18,
2020