alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Unassociated Document


    EXHIBIT 10.2

     

    PHILIP A.
BARATELLI

     

    
 

    
      
        	 
      	
                August
      6, 2009

              


      

    

     

    


    Clarus
Corporation

    One
Landmark Square

    Stamford,
CT 06901

    


    


    
      	
               
      

            	
              Re:

            	
              Clarus Corporation
      (the “Company”)

            


    

    


    Dear
Sirs:

    


    In order to facilitate the Company’s
efforts to reduce its level of operating expenses, I agree to a ten percent
(10%) reduction of my current base salary of $200,000. This letter agreement is made an executed and
shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York, without regard to the
conflicts of laws principles thereof.  This letter
agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an
original and all of which shall constitute one agreement. If this letter
agreement correctly expresses our mutual intentions, please execute and return
the enclosed copy of this letter agreement to the undersigned.

    


    


    
      
        	
              	
                By:
      

              	
                /s/ Philip A.
      Baratelli

              	 
	 	 	
                Philip
      A. Baratelli

              	 


      

    

    


    AGREED TO
AND ACCEPTED

    ON AUGUST
6, 2009

    


    CLARUS
CORPORATION

    


    


    
      
        	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:   	
                /s/ Warren B.
      Kanders

              	 	 	
              	 
	 	
                
                  Name:  Warren
      B. Kanders

                

              	 	 	
                 

              	 
	 	
                
                  Title:  Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5561 

To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 

to designate high priority corridors on the National Highway System 

in the State of North Carolina, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 

Mr. BUTTERFIELD (for himself and Mr. JONES) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency 

Act of 1991 to designate high priority corridors on the 

National Highway System in the State of North Carolina, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Military Corridor 

5 Transportation Improvement Act of 2014’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5561 IH

1 SEC. 2. HIGH PRIORITY CORRIDORS ON NATIONAL HIGH2 WAY SYSTEM. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1105(c) of the Intermodal 

4 Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 

5 2032) is amended by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(81) United States Route 117/Interstate 

7 Route 795 from United States Route 70 in Golds8 boro, Wayne County, North Carolina, to Interstate 

9 Route 40 west of Faison, Sampson County, North 

10 Carolina. 

11 ‘‘(82) United States Route 70 from its intersec12 tion with Interstate Route 40 in Garner, Wake 

13 County, North Carolina, to the Port at Morehead 

14 City, Carteret County, North Carolina.’’. 

15 (b) INCLUSION OF CERTAIN ROUTE SEGMENTS ON

16 INTERSTATE SYSTEM.—Section 1105(e)(5)(A) of the 

17 Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 

18 (105 Stat. 2031; 109 Stat. 597; 115 Stat. 872; 118 Stat. 

19 293; 126 Stat. 426) is amended in the first sentence by 

20 striking ‘‘and subsection (c)(57)’’ and inserting ‘‘sub21 section (c)(57), subsection (c)(81), and subsection 

22 (c)(82)’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[No. 24359.

Department One.

March 17, 1933.]

#### Bayside Iron Works, *Respondent,*v. Three Lakes Lumber Company, *Appellant.**1*

*Mulvihill S Anderson,*for appellant.

*Blach & Rudeer,*for respondent.

1

Reported in 19 P. (2d) 1108.

Holcomb, J.

In its amended complaint, respondent sued to recover $2,072.82, on a first cause of action, as the value of certain machinery and equipment, labor performed and material furnished, for converting a gasoline truck motor and steam logging donkey engine into a gasoline donkey pursuant to the directions of appellant.

*284In its answer, appellant denied generally the allegations in the amended complaint as to the reasonable value of such work and material, and alleged’ affirmatively that the gasoline donkey engine was constructed by respondent under an agreement that the price for it was not to be in excess of $850. Appellant further alleged that such donkey engine was of the reasonable value of $850, and pleaded a tender of that sum to respondent. The affirmative matter in the answer was denied by the reply.

Upon a trial to the court without a jury, it found in favor of respondent, upon the facts, for the full amount demanded.

On appeal, appellant bases errors upon certain findings made by the trial court, and that the court erred in entering judgment for any amount in excess of one thousand dollars on the first cause of action in favor of respondent.

The evidence is in most respects utterly conflicting. While it would seem to us that the recovery was greatly in excess of what appellant expected to pay for the outfit, we are unable to say that the evidence preponderates against the findings and conclusions of the trial court. In such case, we cannot disturb its findings and conclusions. *Webb v. Johnson,*167 Wash. 78, 8 P. (2d) 999; *Herz v. Ransom,*168 Wash. 512, 12 P. (2d) 750.

The trial judge, after having held that there was no definite contract under the facts disclosed by the evidence, also analyzed the facts and held that the labor and material entering into the construction of the gasoline donkey were all procured at the direction of the principal owner and manager of appellant.

*Littell v. Saulsberry,*40 Wash. 550, 82 Pac. 909, cited by appellant, was a case where there was a written offer and a written acceptance of the offer by, the *285parties shown, which does not fit this case. Nor does the case of *Gordon v. Gillespie,*58 Wash. 627, 109 Pac. 109, for the reason that the trial court in that ease had found that there was a contract between the parties guaranteeing and agreeing that the total cost should not exceed a certain sum, which is contrary to the case here. Cases cited from outside jurisdictions are to the same effect, and have no influence on the instant case.

Since the evidence does not preponderate against the findings of the trial court, the judgment must be affirmed.

Beals, C. J., Parker, Mitchell, and Millard, JJ., concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DOCS_SF:101553.1 APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF

ATTORNEY ERIC SEILER PRO HAC VICE

PACHULSKI STANG ZIEHL 

& JONES LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LA W

SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

Eric Seiler

FRIEDMAN KAPLAN SEILER & ADELMAN LLP

7 Times Square

New York, NY 10036-6516

Telephone: 212-833-1100

Email: eseiler@fklaw.com

-andIsaac M. Pachulski (CA Bar No. 62337)

Debra I. Grassgreen (CA Bar No. 169978)

Gabriel I. Glazer (CA Bar No. 246384)

PACHULSKI STANG ZIEHL & JONES LLP

150 California Street, 15th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: (415) 263-7000

Facsimile: (415) 263-7010

E-mail: ipachulski@pszjlaw.com

dgrassgreen@pszjlaw.com

gglazer@pszjlaw.com

jlucas@pszjlaw.com

Attorneys for The Baupost Group, L.L.C., as the general 

partner and investment manager for certain entities

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CORP., et al.,

Debtor.

Case No. 19-30088

Chapter 11

APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF 

ATTORNEY ERIC SEILER PRO HAC 

VICE

Pursuant to B.L.R. 1001-2(a) and Civil L.R. 11-3, Eric Seiler, an active member in good 

standing of the bar of the State of New York and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 

hereby applies for admission to practice in the Northern District of California on a pro hac vice basis 

representing The Baupost Group L.L.C. in the above-entitled action.

In support of this application, I certify on oath that:

1. I am an active member in good standing of a United States Court or of the highest 

court of another State or the District of Columbia, as indicated above;

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3118 Filed: 07/22/19 Entered: 07/22/19 10:16:45 Page 1 of

2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 "' 

z 

13 

:c: 

14 

z 

< 

15 

"' 

16 :c: 

< 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2. I agree to abide by the Standards of Professional Conduct set forth in Local Rule 11-

4, and agree to become familiar with the Local Rules and the Bankruptcy Dispute Resolution 

Program of this Court; and, 

3. An attorney who is a member of the bar of this Court in good standing and who

maintains an office within the State of California has been designated as co-counsel in the aboveentitled action. The name, address and telephone number of that attorney is: 

Debra I. Grassgeen (CA Bar No. 169978) 

Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP 

150 California Street, 15th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: ( 415) 263-7000 

Facsimile: (415) 263-7010 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Dated: July _!_j, 2019 

DOCS_SF:101553.1 

Eric Seiler 

APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF 

ATTORNEY ERIC SEILER PRO HAC VICE 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3118 Filed: 07/22/19 Entered: 07/22/19 10:16:45 Page 2 of

2
Exhibit
      32.1


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**





In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Summit Environmental
      Corporation, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September
      30, 2006 (the “Report”), I, Don Jordan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      hereby certify that to my knowledge:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78o(d)); and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      December 21, 2006




*/s/
              Don Jordan*Don JordanChief Financial
              Officer





The
      above
      certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB
      or as a separate disclosure document.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Mark Rapoport, Chief Operating Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company of Landacorp, Inc. (the "Company") hereby
certify that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2003, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 99.2
(the "Periodic Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.


Date:  November 7, 2003                                  /s/ Mark Rapoport
                                                    ---------------------------
                                                    Mark Rapoport
                                                    Chief Operating Officer and
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
1

The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the

Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the

Honorable Beverly Stites Jones, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western

District of Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 04-2446

___________

Charles Bausley, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Roy Bass, Deputy, Crawford County * Western District of Arkansas.

Detention Center; Kevin Dagan, *

Deputy, Crawford County Detention * [UNPUBLISHED]

Center, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: October 1, 2004

Filed: October 13, 2004

___________

Before MURPHY, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Charles Bausley appeals the district court’s1

 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983

action claiming defendant jail personnel violated his constitutional rights in various
-2-

ways. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude dismissal was proper for

the reasons the district court stated. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
EXHIBIT E 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3927-5 Filed: 09/18/19 Entered: 09/18/19 13:48:35 Page 1

of 2
650 California Street, Suite 1900

San Francisco, CA 94108

Email: admin@kellerbenvenutti.com

Billing Statement No. 072019A

Date: 09/13/2019

Due Upon Receipt

PG&E Corporation

Attn: Janet Loduca

77 Beale Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

00138-31 PG&E

Chapter 11 representation- Expenses

Type Date Description Quantity Rate Fees and

Expenses

Total

Expense 07/09/2019 E109 Local travel: Uber from USBC to office after July 9 omnibus hearing. 1.00 $11.73 $11.73

Expense 07/10/2019 E116 Trial transcripts: eScribers Invoice No. 261601 (July 9, 2019 hearing). 1.00 $883.30 $883.30

Expense 07/15/2019 E107 Delivery services/messengers: Nationwide Legal Invoice No. 358648 (June 21 and 25,

2019 deliveries).

1.00 $342.94 $342.94

Expense 07/15/2019 E101 Copying: Clear Discovery Invoice No. 0001159 (binders for May 22, 2019 hearing). 1.00 $1,587.70 $1,587.70

Expense 07/15/2019 E101 Copying: Clear Discovery Invoice No. 0001191 (binders for June 26, 2019 hearing). 1.00 $7,142.70 $7,142.70

Expense 07/15/2019 E101 Copying: Clear Discovery Invoice No. 0001191 (binders for July 9, 2019 hearing). 1.00 $1,113.06 $1,113.06

Expense 07/28/2019 E116 Trial transcripts: eScribers Invoice No. 264444 (July 24, 2019 hearing). 1.00 $707.85 $707.85

Expense 07/29/2019 E107 Delivery services/messengers: Nationwide Legal Invoice No. 359030 (July 1, 3, and 8,

2019 deliveries).

1.00 $324.62 $324.62

Expense 07/30/2019 E101 Copying: Clear Discovery Invoice No. 0001205 (binders for July 8, 2019 hearing). 1.00 $3,328.64 $3,328.64

Time Keeper Position Time Rate Fees and Expenses

Total

Fees and Expenses Subtotal $15,442.54

Fees and Expenses Total $15,442.54

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3927-5 Filed: 09/18/19 Entered: 09/18/19 13:48:35 Page 2

of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5552 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5552

 To designate the United States Customs and Border Protection Port of 
   Entry located at First Street and Pan American Avenue in Douglas, 
         Arizona, as the ``Raul Hector Castro Port of Entry''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 18, 2014

  Mr. Barber (for himself, Mr. Pastor of Arizona, Mr. Grijalva, Mrs. 
 Kirkpatrick, Ms. Sinema, and Mr. Schweikert) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the United States Customs and Border Protection Port of 
   Entry located at First Street and Pan American Avenue in Douglas, 
         Arizona, as the ``Raul Hector Castro Port of Entry''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RAUL HECTOR CASTRO PORT OF ENTRY.

    (a) Designation.--The United States Customs and Border Protection 
Port of Entry located at First Street and Pan American Avenue in 
Douglas, Arizona, shall be known and designated as the ``Raul Hector 
Castro Port of Entry''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the port of entry 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Raul Hector Castro Port of Entry''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

Certifications

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned officer of Keystone Automotive Operations, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended September 30, 2006 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |     |  |                                                                     
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 13, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ BRYANT P. BYNUM                                                 
|                        |  |     |  | Bryant P. Bynum Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 and is not being filed as
part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       2,484,095
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,883,241
<ALLOWANCES>                                    94,412
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,377,979
<PP&E>                                       6,277,386
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,834,195
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,456,209
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,825,609
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         48
<COMMON>                                        15,710
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,617,688
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,456,209
<SALES>                                     35,718,598
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            35,718,598
<CGS>                                       23,483,619
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               23,483,619
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            11,400,034
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             156,367
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                725,279
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            725,279
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   725,279
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03



</TABLE>
#### Gordon and Jack, a Partnership, Appellant, v Royal Indemnity Co., Respondent, et al., Defendants. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Submitted March 11, 1996;

decided April 4, 1996

Motion for reargument granted *[see,*87 NY2d 968] and, upon reargument, motion for leave to appeal denied, with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5472 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5472

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service currently 
   located at 16281 U.S. Highway 59 in Moscow, Texas, as the ``Anna 
            Stepanovna Politkovskaya Memorial Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 15, 2014

 Mr. Stockman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service currently 
   located at 16281 U.S. Highway 59 in Moscow, Texas, as the ``Anna 
            Stepanovna Politkovskaya Memorial Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ANNA STEPANOVNA POLITKOVSKAYA MEMORIAL POST OFFICE.

    (a) Findings.--Congress finds as follows:
            (1) Anna Stepanovna Politkovskaya, an American citizen of 
        Russian extraction, was a Russian-American journalist who 
        exposed numerous human rights violations committed by the 
        Russian military in Chechnya, and was a harsh critic of 
        Vladimir Putin.
            (2) In 2001, while investigating complaints of torture in 
        the Chechen town of Khattuni, she was detained and beaten by 
        Russian military officials.
            (3) In 2004, she published the book Putin's Russia, which 
        exposed many harsh police state tactics of the Putin regime.
            (4) In September 2004, she became severely ill after an 
        assassination attempt using poisoned tea.
            (5) In 2006, she was shot to death in her apartment in 
        Moscow, Russia.
    (b) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
currently located at 16281 U.S. Highway 59 in Moscow, Texas, shall 
hereafter be known as the ``Anna Stepanovna Politkovskaya Memorial Post 
Office''.
    (c) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referenced 
in subsection (b) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Anna 
Stepanovna Politkovskaya Memorial Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```