alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [LLMT922200-10-L13100000-FI0000-P; NDM 94701]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Per 30 U.S.C. 188(d), Aavark Services, Inc., timely filed a petition for reinstatement of competitive oil and gas lease NDM 94701, McKenzie County, North Dakota. The lessee paid the required rental accruing from the date of termination.

                        No leases were issued that affect these lands. The lessee agrees to new lease terms for rentals and royalties of $10 per acre and 16                        2/3                         percent. The lessee paid the $500 administration fee for the                               ( print page 3922)                            reinstatement of the lease and $163 cost for publishing this Notice.                    

The lessee met the requirements for reinstatement of the lease per Sec. 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188). We are proposing to reinstate the lease, effective the date of termination, subject to—
      - The original terms and conditions of the lease;
      - The increased rental of $10 per acre;
      - The increased royalty of 162/3                         percent; and                    
      - The $163 cost of publishing this Notice.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Teri Bakken, Chief, Fluids Adjudication Section, Bureau of Land Management Montana State Office, 5001 Southgate Drive, Billings, Montana 59101-4669, 406-896-5091.

Teri Bakken,

Chief, Fluids Adjudication Section.

[FR Doc. 2010-1360 Filed 1-22-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P
#### Frederick Haake, Respondent, v. Frank T. Reynolds, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Opinion by

Haight, J.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 235 (Thursday, December 7, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 62762-62763]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-29774]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 638

[Docket No. 950725190-5257-02; I.D. 120195A]


Coral and Coral Reefs of the Gulf of Mexico; Wild Live Rock 
Fishery

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Closure.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS closes the fishery for wild live rock in the exclusive 
economic zone (EEZ) of the Gulf of Mexico. This action is necessary to 
prevent exceeding the quota for 1995.

EFFECTIVE DATE: Effective 12:01 a.m., December 5, 1995 through December 
31, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Georgia Cranmore, 813-570-5305.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Live rock in the EEZ is managed under the 
Fishery Management Plan for Coral and Coral Reefs of the Gulf of Mexico 
(FMP). The FMP was prepared by the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management 
Council and is implemented through regulations at 50 CFR part 638 under 
the authority of the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management Act 
(16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.).
    Section 638.26(d)(1) established a quota of 500,000 lb (226,796 kg) 
for the fishing year that began January 1, 1995. Section 638.26(d)(2) 
requires the Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, NOAA (AA), to close 
the wild live rock fishery in the Gulf EEZ when the quota is reached, 
or is projected to be reached.
    The AA has determined that the quota will be reached on December 4, 
1995. Accordingly, the wild live rock fishery in the Gulf EEZ is closed 
effective 12:01 a.m., local time, December 5, 1995, and 

[[Page 62763]]
will not reopen until January 1, 1996. During the closure, wild live 
rock may not be harvested or possessed in the Gulf EEZ, and the 
purchase, barter, trade, or sale of wild live rock in or from the Gulf 
EEZ is prohibited. The latter prohibition does not apply to wild live 
rock that was harvested prior to December 5, 1995.

Classification

    This action is required by 50 CFR 638.26(d) and is exempt from 
review under E.O. 12866.

    Dated: December 1, 1995.
Richard W. Surdi,
Acting Director, Office of Fisheries Conservation and Management, 
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 95-29774 Filed 12-1-95; 4:55 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
EXHIBIT 31

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a
14(a)/15D-14(a) and SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Joey DiFrancesco, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive
officer) and principal financial officer of Raven Moon Entertainment, Inc. (the
"Registrant"), certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
	a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
	b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
	c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date.

5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):
	a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
	b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls.

Dated: August 21, 2006		/s/ Joseph DiFrancesco
				----------------------------
				Joey DiFrancesco, President,
				Chief Executive Officer and
				Principal Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5206 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5206

   To allow Foreign Service and other executive agency employees to 
            designate beneficiaries of their death benefits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 25, 2014

Mr. Grayson (for himself and Ms. Ros-Lehtinen) introduced the following 
 bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in 
  addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To allow Foreign Service and other executive agency employees to 
            designate beneficiaries of their death benefits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REVISION TO THE ADMINISTRATION OF DEATH GRATUITIES FOR 
              FOREIGN SERVICE AND OTHER EXECUTIVE AGENCY EMPLOYEES.

    Section 413 of the Foreign Service Act of 1980 (22 U.S.C. 3973) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a) by inserting ``designated 
        beneficiaries or'' before ``surviving dependents'';
            (2) in subsection (b) by inserting ``designated 
        beneficiaries or'' before ``survivors'';
            (3) in subsection (c) by striking ``survivors and 
        beneficiaries'' and inserting ``designated beneficiaries then 
        survivors'';
            (4) by striking subsection (d); and
            (5) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (d).
                                 <all>
```
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4258 Filed: 10/17/19 Entered: 10/17/19 16:04:16 Page 1 of

34
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4258 Filed: 10/17/19 Entered: 10/17/19 16:04:16 Page 2 of

34
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4258 Filed: 10/17/19 Entered: 10/17/19 16:04:16 Page 3 of

34
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4258 Filed: 10/17/19 Entered: 10/17/19 16:04:16 Page 4 of

34
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4258 Filed: 10/17/19 Entered: 10/17/19 16:04:16 Page 5 of

34
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4258 Filed: 10/17/19 Entered: 10/17/19 16:04:16 Page 6 of

34
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4258 Filed: 10/17/19 Entered: 10/17/19 16:04:16 Page 7 of

34
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4258 Filed: 10/17/19 Entered: 10/17/19 16:04:16 Page 8 of

34
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4258 Filed: 10/17/19 Entered: 10/17/19 16:04:16 Page 9 of

34
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4258 Filed: 10/17/19 Entered: 10/17/19 16:04:16 Page 10

of 34
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4258 Filed: 10/17/19 Entered: 10/17/19 16:04:16 Page 11

of 34
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4258 Filed: 10/17/19 Entered: 10/17/19 16:04:16 Page 12

of 34
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4258 Filed: 10/17/19 Entered: 10/17/19 16:04:16 Page 13

of 34
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4258 Filed: 10/17/19 Entered: 10/17/19 16:04:16 Page 14

of 34
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4258 Filed: 10/17/19 Entered: 10/17/19 16:04:16 Page 15

of 34
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4258 Filed: 10/17/19 Entered: 10/17/19 16:04:16 Page 16

of 34
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4258 Filed: 10/17/19 Entered: 10/17/19 16:04:16 Page 17

of 34
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4258 Filed: 10/17/19 Entered: 10/17/19 16:04:16 Page 18

of 34
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4258 Filed: 10/17/19 Entered: 10/17/19 16:04:16 Page 19

of 34
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4258 Filed: 10/17/19 Entered: 10/17/19 16:04:16 Page 20

of 34
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4258 Filed: 10/17/19 Entered: 10/17/19 16:04:16 Page 21

of 34
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4258 Filed: 10/17/19 Entered: 10/17/19 16:04:16 Page 22

of 34
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4258 Filed: 10/17/19 Entered: 10/17/19 16:04:16 Page 23

of 34
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4258 Filed: 10/17/19 Entered: 10/17/19 16:04:16 Page 24

of 34
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4258 Filed: 10/17/19 Entered: 10/17/19 16:04:16 Page 25

of 34
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4258 Filed: 10/17/19 Entered: 10/17/19 16:04:16 Page 26

of 34
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4258 Filed: 10/17/19 Entered: 10/17/19 16:04:16 Page 27

of 34
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4258 Filed: 10/17/19 Entered: 10/17/19 16:04:16 Page 28

of 34
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4258 Filed: 10/17/19 Entered: 10/17/19 16:04:16 Page 29

of 34
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4258 Filed: 10/17/19 Entered: 10/17/19 16:04:16 Page 30

of 34
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4258 Filed: 10/17/19 Entered: 10/17/19 16:04:16 Page 31

of 34
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4258 Filed: 10/17/19 Entered: 10/17/19 16:04:16 Page 32

of 34
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4258 Filed: 10/17/19 Entered: 10/17/19 16:04:16 Page 33

of 34
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4258 Filed: 10/17/19 Entered: 10/17/19 16:04:16 Page 34

of 34
#### Fred C. Biggs and Others, Respondents, v. Homer W. Rightmeyer and Others, Appellants.

Order affirmed.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-23-00066-CV

Abelardo G. GONZALEZ,

Appellant

v.

Alberto J. GONZALEZ, Sergio R. Gonzalez, Rosalinda Gonzalez, Dianna Gonzalez,

Appellees

From the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CVH001007D3

Honorable Joel B. Johnson, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ, AND JUSTICE 

VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, this appeal is 

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b) (allowing appellate 

courts to dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution when an appellant fails to pay or make 

arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) 

(allowing appellate courts to dismiss an appeal when an appellant fails to comply with a court 

order). Costs of appeal are taxed against appellant.

SIGNED May 24, 2023.

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5545 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5545

To reauthorize the Federal Ocean Acidification Research and Monitoring 
                              Act of 2009.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 18, 2014

Mr. Farr (for himself, Mr. Young of Alaska, and Mrs. Capps) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science, 
                         Space, and Technology

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To reauthorize the Federal Ocean Acidification Research and Monitoring 
                              Act of 2009.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF FEDERAL OCEAN ACIDIFICATION RESEARCH AND 
              MONITORING ACT OF 2009.

    Section 12409 of the Federal Ocean Acidification Research and 
Monitoring Act of 2009 (33 U.S.C. 3708) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``this subtitle'' and 
        all that follows through paragraph (4) and inserting ``this 
        subtitle $20,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2015 through 
        2018.''; and
            (2) in subsection (b), by striking ``this subtitle'' and 
        all that follows through paragraph (4) and inserting ``this 
        subtitle $15,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2015 through 
        2018.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1
 
 CERTIFICATIONS
 
 I, James B. Wiegand, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:
 
 1.   I have reviewed the report being filed on Form 10-K byRosewind Corporation.
 
 2.   Based on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the  statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by the report;
 
 3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in the report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Rosewind Corporation as of, and for, the periods presented in the report;
 
 4.   I and the other certifying officer are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Regulation 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) for Rosewind Corporation and have:
 
 i.   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to Rosewind Corporation, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made  known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which the periodic reports are being
prepared;
 
 ii.  Evaluated the effectiveness of Rosewind Corporation's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of the report ("Evaluation Date"); and
 
 iii. Presented in the report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 
 5.   I and the other certifying officer have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Rosewind Corporation auditors and the audit committee of the board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent function):
 
 i.   All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect Rosewind Corporation's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified Rosewind Corporation's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls;
and
 
 ii.  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal controls; and
 
 6.   I and the other certifying officer have indicated in the report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies
and material weaknesses.
 
 Date: October 20, 2009
 
 By:
/s/ James B. WiegandJames B. Wiegand
President
Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 99.1**




**AGGREGATE
      SCHEDULE OF PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST DISTRIBUTIONS TO CERTIFICATEHOLDERS**


Class
              Interest
              Principal
              Losses
              Ending
                BalanceA-1
              2,799,066.93
              7,914,963.62
              -
              53,639,036.38A-2
              88,764.88
              -
              -
              53,639,036.38A-3
              5,333,950.83
              4,442,371.39
              -
              103,748,628.61A-4
              20,650.00
              -
              -
              413,000.00A-5
              1,961,450.00
              -
              -
              39,229,000.00A-6
              235,650.00
              -
              -
              4,713,000.00A-7
              -
              1,315,174.90
              -
              -A-PO
              -
              7,268.71
              -
              592,934.28A-R
              0.50
              100.00
              -
              -B-1
              291,641.29
              38,665.97
              -
              5,811,334.04B-2
              67,301.84
              8,922.90
              -
              1,341,077.09B-3
              33,650.92
              4,461.46
              -
              670,538.54B-4
              22,433.95
              2,974.29
              -
              447,025.70B-5
              16,850.40
              2,234.03
              -
              335,765.97B-6
              16,838.54
              2,232.25
              0.21
              335,529.99
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13040 Filed: 10/02/22 Entered: 10/04/22 12:13:33 Page 1

of 3
2

I propose that “telephonic conferences" be held separately with each of the parties in receipt of my 

separate discovery requests given that each of these parties have refused to meet and confer on their 

own accord. These conferences would be set at the convenience of the Court and parties as 

follows:

1) 

Cathy Yanni, Current Trustee - This telephonic conference would include Judge Montali, 

Ms. Yanni, Trustee Counsel, TOC Members and Abrams to seek process remedies as I 

identified within the Motion for Trust Discovery [Dkt. 12440], subsequent reply and those 

related motions filed by the Trustee

2) 

Justice Trotter, Former Trustee - This telephonic conference would include Justice Trotter, 

J. Trotter's Counsel, JAMS executive(s), JAMS Counsel and Abrams to seek process 

remedies to address the issues identified within the Motion for JAMS Discovery [Dkt. 12766]

3) 

Debtors Discovery - This telephonic conference would include the Debtors, Debtors’ 

Counsel and Abrams to seek process remedies to address the issues identified within the 

Motion for Debtor Discovery [Dkt. 12995] and in accordance with the Confidentiality and

Protective Order referenced above.

Respectfully, I request that these meetings be held sooner rather than later to expedite

resolution.  I also recognize that “Civil Local Rule 37‐1(a)” also applies as referenced within

the “Practices and Procedures in Judge Montali’s Court” which states the following:

"Conference Between Counsel Required. The Court will not entertain a request or a motion to

resolve a disclosure or discovery dispute unless, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37, counsel have

previously conferred for the purpose of attempting to resolve all disputed issues. If counsel

for the moving party seeks to arrange such a conference and opposing counsel refuses or

fails to confer, the Judge may impose an appropriate sanction, which may include an order

requiring payment of all reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees, caused by the

refusal or failure to confer."

I have not filed a motion to request sanctions of these parties in

accordance with this provision.  However, to whatever extent sanctions

are independently sought by the Court for “refusal or failure to confer,” I

respectfully request that the required payments be in the form of a deposit into the PG&E Fire

Victim Trust and not to Abrams as the “moving party."  Please note, I am only seeking these

telephonic conferences and citing these local rules related to sanctions because parties have not

responded to my repeated good‐faith requests to remedy these critical issues in the best interests

of victims.  Instead they have chosen to block reasonable discovery and disclosures at every

turn.  I have always initially sought to resolve these issues through meetings as less intrusive and

less costly remedies compared to formal Motions within the Court.  Despite parties failure to

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13040 Filed: 10/02/22 Entered: 10/04/22 12:13:33 Page 2

of 3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13040 Filed: 10/02/22 Entered: 10/04/22 12:13:33 Page 3

of 3