alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTICE OF CARA FENEIS’S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM THE AUTOMATIC STAY

- 1 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Yosef Peretz (SBN 209288) 

yperetz@peretzlaw.com

Shane Howarter (SBN 311970) 

showarter@peretzlaw.com

PERETZ & ASSOCIATES

22 Battery Street, Suite 200

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: 415.732.3777 

Facsimile: 415.732.3791 

Attorneys for CARA FENEIS

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY,

Debtor. 

Case No. 19-30089 (DM) 

Chapter 11 

CARA FENEIS’ NOTICE OF 

HEARING ON MOTION FOR 

RELIEF FROM THE AUTOMATIC 

STAY 

Date: January 29, 2020 

Time: 10:00 a.m. 

Ctrm: 17 

Judge: Hon. Dennis Montali 

NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION FOR RELIEF 

FROM STAY

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, on January 29, 2020, at 10:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter 

as the matter may be heard before the Honorable Dennis Montali of United States Bankruptcy 

Court, Northern District of California, located at 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, 

California, 16th Floor, Courtroom 17, CARA FENEIS (“Feneis”), will and hereby does move the 

Court for relief from the automatic stay.

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5207 Filed: 12/26/19 Entered: 12/26/19 16:55:40 Page 1 of

2
NOTICE OF CARA FENEIS’S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM THE AUTOMATIC STAY

- 2 - 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: December 26, 2019 PERETZ & ASSOCIATES

 By: ____________________ 

 Yosef Peretz

Attorneys for CARA FENEIS

 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5207 Filed: 12/26/19 Entered: 12/26/19 16:55:40 Page 2 of

2
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-143451 on Form S-3 of our reports dated
February 28, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements of KKR Financial Holdings LLC and subsidiaries (the "Company"), and the effectiveness of the Company's internal
control over financial reporting (which report on the consolidated financial statements expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company's adoption of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157,Fair Value Measurement, and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial LiabilitiesIncluding an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115, effective
January 1, 2007), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of KKR Financial Holdings LLC for the year ended December 31, 2007.

/s/
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San
Francisco, California
February 28, 2008

---



QuickLinks
#### Ezekiel Brown, plaintiff in error, *vs.*William T. Crane, defendant in error.

Where “M” held a tract of land under bond for titles from 11W” and sold the same to “ C,” executing a bond to make a fee simple title so soon as he obtained a title from “ W,” “C” paying the purchase money in full, and <:B,” with a full knowledge of these facts, con*484federating with others, by threats, etc., induced “M” to sell the land and to transfer to him “W’s” bond, under which transfer “B” procured a deed from “ W ” :

*'Held,*That a demurrer to a bill filed by “C” setting up the foregoing facts and praying that “ B ” may be decreed to execute' him a title to said land, was properly overruled. (R.)

Equity. Bond for titles. Fraud. Before Judge Knight. Towns Superior Court. November Term, 1872.

For the facts of this case, see the decision.

Wier Boyd ; M. L. Smith, for plaintiff in error.

No appearance for defendant.

Warner, Chief Justice.

The complainant alleges in his bill that, on the 16th day of March, 1864, he purchased from one Maulden a certain described tract, of land in the county of Towns, and paid him therefor the sum of $500 00, and took Maulden’s bond to make him a fee simple title to the land so soon as Maulden got a title to the land from Wyley, whose bond for title Maul-den held. . The complainant went into possession of the land, planted a portion of it in corn and went to the State of Tennessee, leaving a negro woman to cultivate it; that in the month of December, 1864, the defendant, Brown, confederating with one Dilles and others, by threats, etc., induced Maulden, who was an old man, to sell the land to him and assign to him Wyley’s bond for title; that Brown went into the possession of the land, under his purchase from Maulden, with a full knowledge that the complainant had purchased and paid for the land, as before stated, and procured a deed therefor to himself from Wyley, or his legal representatives. The piayer of the bill is that Brown may be decreed to execute a title to the land to the complainant. The defendant demurred to the complainant's bill for want of equity, which was overruled by the Court, and the defendant excepted. In ■our judgment, there was no error in the Court below in over*485ruling the demurrer to the complainant’s bill, on fcbe statement of facts alleged therein. The purchase of the land from Maulden by the defendant, in the manner as charged and set forth in the complainant’s bill, with full knowledge that the complainant had previously purchased and paid for the land, was such a transaction as, in equity and good conscience, cannot be sanctioned. The view which a Court of equity will take of it is to regard the defendant as holding the legal title to the land in trust for the benefit of the complainant, who had previously purchased and paid for it, and of which fact the defendant had full knowledge at the time he purchased the land from Maulden and procured the legal title thereto to himself.

Let the judgment of the Court below be affirmed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

.

Heinz Binder (SBN 87908)

Robert G. Harris (SBN 124678)

BINDER & MALTER, LLP

2775 Park Avenue

Santa Clara, CA 95050

Tel: (408) 295-1700

Fax: (408) 295-1531

Email: Heinz@bindermalter.com

Email: Rob@bindermalter.com

Attorneys for TURN, The Utility Reform Network

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re

PG&E CORPORATION

and

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY,

 Debtors.

Case Nos. 19-30088 DM (Lead Case)

 19-30089 DM

Chapter 11

Jointly Administered 

☐ Affects PG&E Corporation

☐ Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company

☒ Affects both Debtors

* All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case 

No. 19-30088 DM.

Date: May 9, 2019

Time: 9:30 a.m. 

Place: Courtroom 17

450 Golden Gate Avenue 

San Francisco, California 

OBJECTION DEADLINE: April 24, 2019

DKT # 1324

EX PARTE APPLICATION BY TURN TO MODIFY PAGE LIMIT FOR REPLY TO 

OPPOSITIONS TO MOTION BY TURN FOR APPOINTMENT OF 

OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF RATEPAYER CLAIMANTS 

PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. §§ 1102(a)(2), 105(a)

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1816 Filed: 05/02/19 Entered: 05/02/19 17:36:05 Page 1 of

2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

.

The Utility Reform Network (“TURN”) hereby applies to this Court for an order modifying 

the limitation of Bankruptcy Local Rule 9013-1, expanding the 15-page limit on reply memoranda to 

21 pages. TURN respectfully represents as follows in this Ex Parte Application: 

1. The Motion by TURN for Appointment of Official Committee of Ratepayer 

Claimants Pursuant To 11 U.S.C. §§ 1102(a)(2), 105(a); Memorandum of Points & Authorities [Dkt. 

#1324] (the “Motion”) was filed and served on April 10, 2019. 

2. The U.S. Trustee, Debtors and Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors each filed 

substantial oppositions to the Motion, raising issues that exceeded, to a degree, the scope of TURN’s 

original filing. In crafting a response, TURN had to delve deep into aspects of regulatory law that, 

in order to offer a full reply, required 21 pages of text. TURN could not, despite attempting to do so,

reduce the text to anything near the 15-page limit set in BLR 9013-1 for reply memoranda. TURN 

believes that additional 6 pages or argument and legal authority to be essential for reaching an 

appropriate and fully-considered result on the Motion. 

WHEREFORE, the Debtor respectfully requests that the Court grant this Application and 

enter an order modifying Bankruptcy Local Rule 9013-1 as to the Motion and expanding the 15-page 

limit on reply memoranda to 21 pages for the Reply to Oppositions to Motion by Turn for

Appointment of Official Committee of Ratepayer Claimants Pursuant To 11 U.S.C. §§ 1102(a)(2), 

105(a).

Dated: May 2, 2019 BINDER & MALTER, LLP

By: /s/ Robert G. Harris 

Robert G. Harris

 Attorneys for TURN, the Utility Reform Network 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1816 Filed: 05/02/19 Entered: 05/02/19 17:36:05 Page 2 of

2
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT ZACHARY D. BITNER, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-1399 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed June 22, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Neil A. Roddenbery, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Tim Bower Rodriguez, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Michael Schaub, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. CASANUEVA, MORRIS, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Certification Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), we, E. Robert Gates, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and John C. Miller, President and Chief Operating Officer of All State Properties Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), hereby certify, to the best of our knowledge, that:



| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                               
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



| |     |                                                                                                                                                 
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 23, 2009



|                                                                   |  |                                                                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                   |  |                                                                                                                              
|/s/ E. Robert Gates                                                |  | /s/ John C. Miller_________________                                                                                          
|E. Robert Gates                                                    |  | John C. Miller                                                                                                               
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |  | President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
|                                                                   |  |
EX-35.5
(logo) OPTION ONE
MORTGAGE
One gets it done.

www.optiononemortgage.com


March 15, 2008

Aurora Loan Services LLC
327 Invemess Drive South
Mail Stop 3199
Englewood, Colorado 80112
Attention: Compliance Coordinator
(SASCO 2007-BC1)
INV #568


Enclosed is the required Sarbanes Oxley Certification:

     RE: Annual officer's certificate delivered pursuant to Section 5.03 of
     that certain servicing agreement, dated as of January 1, 2007 (the
     "Agreement"), by and among Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., Option One
     Mortgage Corporation, as servicer (the "Servicer"), Aurora Loan Services
     LLC, as master servicer, and acknowledged by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as
     Trustee, relating to the issuance of the Structured Asset Securities
     Corporation

If you have any questions, please contact Elizabeth Nguyen at (949) 727-8226 or
email: Elizabeth.Nguyen@oomc.com


Option One Mortgage Corporation
6501 Irvine Center Drive
Irvine, CA 92618



6501 Irvine Center Drive * Irvine * California *  92618 * (800) 704-0800

(logo) EQUAL HOUSING
LENDER


(page)


(logo) OPTION ONE
MORTGAGE
One gets it done.

www.optiononemortgage.com



Annual Compliance Certificate

I, Fabiola Camperi, the undersigned, the duly authorized President of Option
One Mortgage Corporation (as "Servicer"), does hereby certify the following for
the calendar year ending on December 31, 2007:

1. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the preceding calendar
   year (or portion thereof) and of its performance under the Servicing
   Agreement (as defined in the cover letter) for such period has been made
   under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
   fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all
   material respects throughout such year (or applicable portion thereof),
   except as disclosed on Appendix B, attached.



Certified By:

/s/ Fabiola Camperi
Name: Fabiola Camperi
Title: President
Date: March 14, 2008



6501 Irvine Center Drive * Irvine * California *  92618 * (800) 704-0800

(logo) EQUAL HOUSING
LENDER


(page)


APPENDIX B

For SEC Regulation AB 1122(d)(4)(vi), loan modifications are required to be
completed in accordance with the transaction agreements and related pool asset
documents. Management notes instances of conflicting language within three PSAs
where the verbiage first indicates to generally modify loans if in the best
interest of the trust, but later qualifies the allowable interest rate
reduction. Non-compliance within this Regulation AB criterion is a result of
Management's incorrect interpretation of the former guidance taking precedence.
.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153-0119

Exhibit 2 

Indemnification Letter 

Entered on Docket 

May 24, 2019

EDWARD J. EMMONS, CLERK 

U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2229-2 Filed: 05/24/19 Entered: 05/24/19 17:06:07 Page 1

of 4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2229-2 Filed: 05/24/19 Entered: 05/24/19 17:06:07 Page 2

of 4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2229-2 Filed: 05/24/19 Entered: 05/24/19 17:06:07 Page 3

of 4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2229-2 Filed: 05/24/19 Entered: 05/24/19 17:06:07 Page 4

of 4
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002I, Craig K. Tagawa, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Shared Hospital Services;2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; andb) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986;] andc) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (or the fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.May 15, 2007              /s/ Craig K. Tagawa   Craig K. Tagawa   Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7145
MICHAEL WAYNE MONTGOMERY, a/k/a Shaka Macumba Zulu X, a/k/a Thomas E. Howard, Petitioner - Appellant, versus T. TRAVIS MEDLOCK, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondent - Appellee.

No. 95-7908
MICHAEL WAYNE MONTGOMERY, a/k/a Shaka Macumba Zulu X, a/k/a Thomas E. Howard, Petitioner - Appellant, versus T. TRAVIS MEDLOCK, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-93-2302-CV-6-3AK)2 Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 22, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. No. 95-7145 dismissed in part and affirmed in part and No. 95-7908 dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Wayne Montgomery, Appellant Pro Se. Larry Cleveland Batson, Robert Eric Petersen, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Michael Montgomery appeals, in appeal number 95-7145, from thedistrict court's order denying his request for preliminary injunctive relief as well as his various pretrial motions filed in connection with his complaint filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988). In appeal number 95-7908, Montgomery appeals from the district court's final order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny relief on the merits. This court may exercise jur isdiction onlyover final orders under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory orders. 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). We find that the order appealed in number 95-7145 is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory order of collateral order,except to the extent that it denies Montgomery's request for a preliminary injunction. Moreover, except to the extent that Montgomery requests injunctive relief, the appeal is moot in view of thecourt's subsequent denial of relief on the merits. We find, however, that the district court committed no reversible error by denying injunctive relief. In appeal number 95-7145, we therefore grant a certificate of probable cause to appeal, and affirm that portion of the district court's order which denies injunctive relief, but dismiss the remainder of the appeal. Regarding appeal number 95-7908, we have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the ap-4 peal on the reasoning of the district court. Montgomery v. Medlock , No. CA-93-2302-CV-6-3AK (D.S.C. Nov. 16, 1995). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

No. 95-7145 - DISMISSED IN PART, AFFIRMED IN PART No. 95-7908 - DISMISSED