alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5586 

To amend title 17, United States Code, to provide that the first sale doctrine 

applies to any computer program that enables a machine or other product 

to operate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 

Mr. FARENTHOLD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 17, United States Code, to provide that 

the first sale doctrine applies to any computer program 

that enables a machine or other product to operate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘You Own Devices Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. FIRST SALE DOCTRINE AND CERTAIN COMPUTER 

6 PROGRAMS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 109 of title 17, United 

8 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol9 lowing: 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5586 IH

1 ‘‘(f) TRANSFER OF CERTAIN COMPUTER PRO2 GRAMS.— 

3 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 

4 106 or section 117, if a computer program enables 

5 any part of a machine or other product to operate, 

6 the owner of the machine or other product is entitled 

7 to transfer an authorized copy of the computer pro8 gram, or the right to obtain such copy, when the 

9 owner sells, leases, or otherwise transfers the ma10 chine or other product to another person. The right 

11 to transfer provided under this subsection may not 

12 be waived by any agreement. 

13 ‘‘(2) SECURITY AND ERROR CORRECTION.—Any 

14 right to receive modifications to the computer pro15 gram described in paragraph (1) relating in whole or 

16 in part to security or error correction that applied 

17 to the owner of the machine or other product de18 scribed in paragraph (1) shall apply to the person to 

19 whom the machine or product and the copy of the 

20 computer program are transferred. 

21 ‘‘(3) TREATMENT OF UNAUTHORIZED COP22 IES.—Nothing in this subsection should be construed 

23 as permitting the owner of a machine or other prod24 uct to retain an unauthorized copy of the computer 

25 program described in paragraph (1) after transferVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:39 Sep 29, 2014 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5586.IH H5586

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5586 IH

1 ring the machine or other product and the copy of 

2 the computer program to another person.’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enact5 ment of this Act and shall apply to transfers of computer 

6 programs occurring on or after such date. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5442 Filed: 01/22/20 Entered: 01/22/20 12:54:24 Page 1 of

36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5442 Filed: 01/22/20 Entered: 01/22/20 12:54:24 Page 2 of

36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5442 Filed: 01/22/20 Entered: 01/22/20 12:54:24 Page 3 of

36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5442 Filed: 01/22/20 Entered: 01/22/20 12:54:24 Page 4 of

36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5442 Filed: 01/22/20 Entered: 01/22/20 12:54:24 Page 5 of

36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5442 Filed: 01/22/20 Entered: 01/22/20 12:54:24 Page 6 of

36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5442 Filed: 01/22/20 Entered: 01/22/20 12:54:24 Page 7 of

36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5442 Filed: 01/22/20 Entered: 01/22/20 12:54:24 Page 8 of

36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5442 Filed: 01/22/20 Entered: 01/22/20 12:54:24 Page 9 of

36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5442 Filed: 01/22/20 Entered: 01/22/20 12:54:24 Page 10

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5442 Filed: 01/22/20 Entered: 01/22/20 12:54:24 Page 11

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5442 Filed: 01/22/20 Entered: 01/22/20 12:54:24 Page 12

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5442 Filed: 01/22/20 Entered: 01/22/20 12:54:24 Page 13

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5442 Filed: 01/22/20 Entered: 01/22/20 12:54:24 Page 14

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5442 Filed: 01/22/20 Entered: 01/22/20 12:54:24 Page 15

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5442 Filed: 01/22/20 Entered: 01/22/20 12:54:24 Page 16

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5442 Filed: 01/22/20 Entered: 01/22/20 12:54:24 Page 17

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5442 Filed: 01/22/20 Entered: 01/22/20 12:54:24 Page 18

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5442 Filed: 01/22/20 Entered: 01/22/20 12:54:24 Page 19

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5442 Filed: 01/22/20 Entered: 01/22/20 12:54:24 Page 20

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5442 Filed: 01/22/20 Entered: 01/22/20 12:54:24 Page 21

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5442 Filed: 01/22/20 Entered: 01/22/20 12:54:24 Page 22

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5442 Filed: 01/22/20 Entered: 01/22/20 12:54:24 Page 23

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5442 Filed: 01/22/20 Entered: 01/22/20 12:54:24 Page 24

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5442 Filed: 01/22/20 Entered: 01/22/20 12:54:24 Page 25

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5442 Filed: 01/22/20 Entered: 01/22/20 12:54:24 Page 26

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5442 Filed: 01/22/20 Entered: 01/22/20 12:54:24 Page 27

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5442 Filed: 01/22/20 Entered: 01/22/20 12:54:24 Page 28

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5442 Filed: 01/22/20 Entered: 01/22/20 12:54:24 Page 29

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5442 Filed: 01/22/20 Entered: 01/22/20 12:54:24 Page 30

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5442 Filed: 01/22/20 Entered: 01/22/20 12:54:24 Page 31

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5442 Filed: 01/22/20 Entered: 01/22/20 12:54:24 Page 32

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5442 Filed: 01/22/20 Entered: 01/22/20 12:54:24 Page 33

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5442 Filed: 01/22/20 Entered: 01/22/20 12:54:24 Page 34

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5442 Filed: 01/22/20 Entered: 01/22/20 12:54:24 Page 35

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5442 Filed: 01/22/20 Entered: 01/22/20 12:54:24 Page 36

of 36
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

___________________________________ )

RONALD L. WHITE et al

., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 14

- 0478 (PLF)

)

TOM VILSACK, Secretary

, )

United States Department of Agriculture, )

)

Defendant. )

___________________________________ )

ORDER

For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion issued this

same day, it is hereby

ORDERED that the defendant’s motion [Dkt. No. 4 ] to dismiss the plaintiffs’

complaint is GRANTED; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE

.

T he Clerk of the Court shall remove this case from the Court’ s docket. This is a final appealable

order. See F ED

. R. A PP

. P. 4(a).

SO ORDERED.

/s/

__________________________ PAUL L. FRIEDMAN

United States District Judge

DATE: February 19, 2015
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5679 

To clarify the ownership of crude oil produced within the jurisdiction of 

the Kurdistan Regional Government of Iraq and to authorize the President to provide defense articles and defense services to the Kurdistan 

Regional Government of Iraq. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 19, 2014 

Mr. ROHRABACHER (for himself, Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California, Mr. 

CULBERSON, Mr. DUNCAN of Tennessee, Mr. SALMON, Mr. MESSER, Mr. 

POE of Texas, Mr. STOCKMAN, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. DUNCAN of South 

Carolina, Mr. BROUN of Georgia, Mr. JONES, Mr. LONG, and Mrs. LUMMIS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To clarify the ownership of crude oil produced within the 

jurisdiction of the Kurdistan Regional Government of 

Iraq and to authorize the President to provide defense 

articles and defense services to the Kurdistan Regional 

Government of Iraq. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5679 IH

1 SECTION 1. OWNERSHIP OF CRUDE OIL PRODUCED WITHIN 

2 THE JURISDICTION OF THE KURDISTAN RE3 GIONAL GOVERNMENT OF IRAQ. 

4 Crude oil produced within the jurisdiction of the 

5 Kurdistan Regional Government of Iraq shall, upon enter6 ing the jurisdiction of the United States, be deemed to 

7 be owned exclusively by the Kurdistan Regional Govern8 ment of Iraq or by any person that purchased such crude 

9 oil from the Kurdistan Regional Government of Iraq. 

10 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE DEFENSE ARTICLES AND 

11 DEFENSE SERVICES TO THE KURDISTAN RE12 GIONAL GOVERNMENT OF IRAQ. 

13 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 3 of the 

14 Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2753), or any other 

15 provision of law, the President is authorized to provide de16 fense articles and defense services directly to the 

17 Kurdistan Regional Government of Iraq. 

18 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the terms ‘‘de19 fense articles’’ and ‘‘defense services’’ have the meanings 

20 given such terms in section 47 of the Arms Export Control 

21 Act (22 U.S.C. 2794 note). 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
PHHMC MORTGAGE PASS- THOUGH CERTIFICATES SERIES 2007-1

           I, Terence W. Edwards, certify that:

           1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all
 reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
covered by this report on Form 10-K of the trust (the "Trust") created
pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement, dated January 1, 2007
(the "Agreement") among PHH Mortgage Capital LLC (the "Depositor"), PHH
Mortgage Corporation (the "Master Servicer") and Citibank, N.A. (the
"Trustee") (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

           2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic
reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
by this report;

           3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution,
servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D
for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act
periodic reports;

           4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed
by the Master Servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance
review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement
required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the Master Servicer has
fulfilled its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects;
and

           5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with
servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related
attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of
noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this
report on Form 10-K.

           In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied
on the information provided to me by the following unaffiliated
parties: the Trustee.

Date: March 17, 2008

/s/Terence W. Edwards
------------------------------------------------
Name:  Terence W. Edwards
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer,
       Senior Officer in Charge of Securitization of the Depositor
I;J 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FILED 

FEB - 4 2009 

ALFRED WAYNE LEE, NANCY MAYER WHITIINGTON, CLERK 

U.S. DISTRICT COURT 

Petitioner, 

v. 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT 

OF JUSTICE, et al., 

Respondents. 

Civil Action No. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

09 0209 

This matter comes before the Court on consideration of Petitioner's pro se 

petition and application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant the application, and 

dismiss the petition. 

Petitioner, who describes himself as "[ a] Black Person of African Ancestry," Pet. at 1 

(caption), alleges that he submitted a request to the United States Attorney for the Southern 

District of Florida for information pertaining to the decision to bring criminal charges against 

Petitioner in federal court rather than state court. Id. at 2. He contends that the federal district 

court was without jurisdiction, and he attributes the decision to prosecute federal charges against 

him to discrimination based on his race. See id. at 14-29. When Petitioner received no response 

to several requests for this information, he states that he submitted letters of petition to the 

Inspector General of the United States Department of Justice and to the Director of the Federal 

Bureau of Investigation. Id. at 3-6. In this action, he asks the Court "to issue a writ of 

mandamus compelling the ... Inspector General & Director of the FBI to comply with 28 U.S.C. 

1 

3 
§535(a)(b) [sic], by initiating/conducting an investigation of his formal petition." Id. at 32. 

The Court has no power to compel the Attorney General or his subordinates to conduct an 

investigation into the matters about which Petitioner complains. See United States v. Nixon, 418 

U.S. 683, 693 (1974) (acknowledging that the Executive Branch "has exclusive authority and 

absolute discretion to decide whether to prosecute a case"); Powell v. Katzenbach, 359 F.2d 234, 

234-35 (D.C. Cir. 1965) (per curiam), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 906 (1966) ("[T]he question of 

whether and when prosecution is to be instituted is within the discretion ofthe Attorney General. 

Mandamus will not lie to control the exercise of this discretion."). 

Because Petitioner fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, the Court will 

dismiss this civil action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l). An Order consistent with this 

Memorandum Opinion is issued separately on this same date. 

Date: ~ .;}.8) ~t)Q'i 

2
**EXHIBIT 31.1**CERTIFICATIONI, Clifton W. Sink, Jr., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of SteelCloud, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.       Date: September 14, 2006 By: /s/ Clifton W. Sink, Jr.           Name: Clifton W. Sink, Jr.    Title: Chief Executive Officer and President  
26
Exhibit 99.1


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

                                   PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Joseph DiFrancesco, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report of
Raven Moon Entertainment on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-QSB fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Raven Moon Entertainment.

Date:    May 13, 2003                       By:  /s/  Joseph DiFrancesco
         ------------                          --------------------------------
                                                     Joseph DiFrancesco
                                                     President and
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5420 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit the release of 

information regarding the status of certain investigations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2014 

Mr. BOUSTANY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit 

the release of information regarding the status of certain 

investigations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RELEASE OF INFORMATION REGARDING THE 

4 STATUS OF CERTAIN INVESTIGATIONS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 6103(e) of the Internal 

6 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

7 the following new paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(11) DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION REGARD9 ING STATUS OF INVESTIGATION OF VIOLATION OF

10 THIS SECTION.—In the case of a person who proVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:57 Sep 10, 2014 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5420.IH H5420

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5420 IH

1 vides to the Secretary information indicating a viola2 tion of section 7213, 7213A, or 7214 with respect 

3 to any return or return information of such person, 

4 the Secretary may disclose to such person (or such 

5 person’s designee)— 

6 ‘‘(A) whether an investigation based on the 

7 person’s provision of such information has been 

8 initiated and whether it is open or closed, 

9 ‘‘(B) whether any such investigation sub10 stantiated such a violation by any individual, 

11 and 

12 ‘‘(C) whether any action has been taken 

13 with respect to such individual (including 

14 whether a referral has been made for prosecu15 tion of such individual).’’. 

16 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

17 this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment 

18 of this Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Mary Radmosky, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of PSPP Holdings, Inc.



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.



4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in exchange act rules 13a-15(e) and 15d- 15(f)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;



c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: May 12, 2008



/s/ Mary Radmosky

Mary Radmosky,

Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent thereof)
Exhibit 32.2



Certifications



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Keystone Automotive Operations, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three and six month periods ended July 2, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |     |  |                                                     
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 16, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ BRYANT P. BYNUM                                 
|                      |  |     |  | Bryant P. Bynum                                     
|                      |  |     |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



28