alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

CONSENT OF PETERS GEOSCIENCES

The undersigned hereby consents to: (i) the filing of the
written disclosure regarding (a) the technical report entitled The Daneros Mine
Project, San Juan County, Utah, U.S.A. dated July 18, 2012, (b) the technical
report entitled Updated Technical Report on Energy Fuels Resources
Corporations Whirlwind Property (Including Whirlwind, Far West, and Crosswind
Claim Groups and Utah State Metalliferous Minerals Lease ML-49312), Mesa County,
Colorado and Grand County, Utah, dated March 15, 2011, (c) the technical report
entitled Updated Technical Report on Energy Fuels Resources Corporations
Energy Queen Project, San Juan County, Utah dated March 15, 2011, (d) the
technical report entitled Amended Technical Report on Energy Fuels Resources
Corporations Willhunt Property, San Miguel County, Colorado dated November 30,
2008, (e) the technical report entitled Technical Report on Colorado Plateau
Partners LLC (Energy Fuels Resources Corporation and Lynx-Royal JV) Sage Plain
Project (Including the Calliham Mine and Sage Mine), San Juan County, Utah and
San Miguel County, Colorado dated December 16, 2011, and (f) the technical
report entitled Technical Report on Energy Fuels Inc.s La Sal District
Project, dated March 25, 2014, in relation to, as applicable, (A) the Form 40-F
Annual Report for the period ended December 31, 2013, and any amendments thereto
(the Form 40-F), of Energy Fuels Inc. (the Company), filed with the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission, (B) the Companys Annual Information
Form for the period ended December 31, 2013 (the AIF) and (C) the Management
Information Circular of the Company dated July 15, 2013, and the documents
incorporated by reference therein (the Circular); and (ii) the incorporation
by reference of such disclosure into (a) the Companys Form S-8 Registration
Statement, being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
and any amendments thereto (the S-8), and (b) the Companys Form F-10
Registration Statement, being filed with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission and any amendments thereto (the F-10).

We also consent to: (i) the use of our name in the AIF, the
Circular, the F-10 and the Form 40-F; (ii) the incorporation by reference of the
Form 40-F, and the AIF into the S-8; and (iii) the incorporation by reference of
the Form 40-F, the AIF and the Circular into the F-10.

|                     | PETERS GEOSCIENCES     
|-------------------- | -----------------------
|                     |                        
|                     | /s/ Douglas C. Peters  
|                     | Name: Douglas C. Peters
|                     | Title: Owner           
|                     |                        
|                     |                        
|Date: March 28, 2014 |                        

---
#### Francis E. Tierney, Appellant, v. White, Porter *&*Paige Manufacturing Company, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C.


§1350)





In
connection with the Annual Report of Karat Platinum Inc. (Formerly Sentra
Consulting Corp.), a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for
the period ended March 31, 2008 (the “Report”) as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the undersigned, Gary M. Jacobs,
Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.




By:/s/Gary M.
      Jacobs
              Name:
      Gary M. Jacobs
              Title: Chief
      Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer
              (Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)
              June
      26, 2008




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Karat Platinum Inc. (Formerly Sentra Consulting Corp.) and will be
retained by Karat Platinum Inc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4702 Filed: 11/12/19 Entered: 11/13/19 12:18:37 Page 1 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4702 Filed: 11/12/19 Entered: 11/13/19 12:18:37 Page 2 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4702 Filed: 11/12/19 Entered: 11/13/19 12:18:37 Page 3 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4702 Filed: 11/12/19 Entered: 11/13/19 12:18:37 Page 4 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4702 Filed: 11/12/19 Entered: 11/13/19 12:18:37 Page 5 of

5
Order entered December 5, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-00120-CR

JAMES BILBRO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F15-23845-K

ORDER

Before the Court is James Bilbro’s November 29, 2017 unopposed Motion for Leave to 

File Post-Submission Reply Brief. We GRANT the motion and DIRECT the Clerk to file the 

Reply Brief tendered by Bilbro on November 29, 2017. 

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5552 

To designate the United States Customs and Border Protection Port of 

Entry located at First Street and Pan American Avenue in Douglas, 

Arizona, as the ‘‘Raul Hector Castro Port of Entry’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 

Mr. BARBER (for himself, Mr. PASTOR of Arizona, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mrs. KIRKPATRICK, Ms. SINEMA, and Mr. SCHWEIKERT) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To designate the United States Customs and Border Protection Port of Entry located at First Street and Pan 

American Avenue in Douglas, Arizona, as the ‘‘Raul 

Hector Castro Port of Entry’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RAUL HECTOR CASTRO PORT OF ENTRY. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The United States Customs and 

5 Border Protection Port of Entry located at First Street 

6 and Pan American Avenue in Douglas, Arizona, shall be 

7 known and designated as the ‘‘Raul Hector Castro Port 

8 of Entry’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5552 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the port of entry referred to in subsection (a) 

4 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Raul Hector 

5 Castro Port of Entry’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10.3





EXHIBIT 10.3




AMENDMENT NO. 1




TO



STANDBY EQUITY PURCHASE AGREEMENT



 THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 (the “Amendment”) to the Standby Equity Distribution
Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated July 10, 2009, between YA GLOBAL MASTER SPV LTD., a
Cayman Islands exempt limited company (the “Investor”) and DIGITAL ANGEL CORPORATION, a
corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware (the “Company”)
is dated July 17, 2009. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning given
thereto in the Agreement.



WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend certain provisions of the Agreement as more fully
described herein;



NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants contained herein and
other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the Investor and the Company hereby agree as follows:




	 	1.	 	Amendments.







	 	a.	 	Section 1.09. Section 1.09 of the Agreement is hereby amended
and restated in its entirety to read as follows:







	 	 	 	“Commitment Amount” shall mean the aggregate amount of up to $5,000,000
which the Investor has agreed to provide to the Company in order to purchase the
Shares pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement provided that, the
Company shall not effect any sales under this Agreement and the Investor shall not
have the obligation to purchase shares of Common Stock under this Agreement to the
extent that after giving effect to such purchase and sale the aggregate number of
shares of Common Stock issued under this Agreement (including any Commitment Shares)
would exceed 3,578,299 shares of Common Stock (which is less than 20% of the
17,891,495 outstanding shares of Common Stock as of the date of this Agreement)
except that such limitation shall not apply in the event that the Company obtains
the approval of its stockholders as required by the applicable rules of The NASDAQ
Stock Market LLC for issuances of Common Stock in excess of such amount.




 


 









 












	 	2.	 	Miscellaneous.







	 	a.	 	The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that, other than as set forth
in this Amendment, the Agreement remains unchanged and in full force and effect.







	 	b.	 	This Amendment may be executed in several counterparts, each of which
will be deemed to be an original and all of which will together constitute one and
the same instrument.






IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment No. 1 to be executed by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, as of the date first set forth above.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	COMPANY:
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Digital Angel Corporation
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Lorraine M. Breece
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Name: Lorraine M. Breece
	 

	 	 	 	Title:   Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	INVESTOR:
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	YA Global Master SPV Ltd.
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	Yorkville Advisors, LLC
	 

	 	Its:
	 	Investment Manager
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Gerald Eicke
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Name: Gerald Eicke
	 

	 	 	 	Title:   Managing Member
Amendments to ebay Inc. Equity Incentive Plans



 Exhibit 10.02 
 AMENDMENT TO THE 
 EBAY INC. 2008 EQUITY INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN, 
 EBAY INC. 2001 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN, 
 EBAY INC. 1999 GLOBAL EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN, 
 EBAY INC. 1998 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN AND 
 SHOPPING.COM LTD. 2004 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 
 MARCH 4, 2009 
 Effective as of the date first set forth above, eBay Inc. (the “Company”) hereby amends
each of the eBay Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Award Plan, eBay Inc. 2001 Equity Incentive Plan, eBay Inc. 1999 Global Equity Incentive Plan, eBay Inc. 1998 Equity Incentive Plan and Shopping.com Ltd. 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (each such plan as
amended to date, a “Plan”) to the extent necessary to provide as follows: 
 “Notwithstanding any other provision of the
Plan to the contrary, upon approval of this amendment by the Company’s stockholders in accordance with the terms of the Plan, the Board of Directors of the Company or Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company may provide
for, and the Company may implement, a one-time-only option exchange offer, pursuant to which certain outstanding Options could, at the election of the person holding such Option, be tendered to the Company for cancellation in exchange for the
issuance of a lesser amount of restricted stock units, stock options or cash payments, provided that such one-time-only option exchange offer is commenced within 12 months of the date of such stockholder approval.” 
 Except as provided in this Amendment, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 
 ********** 
 I hereby certify that the foregoing amendment was duly adopted by the
Board of Directors of the Company effective as of March 4, 2009 and by the stockholders of the Company effective as of April 29, 2009. 
 Executed on July 28, 2009 
  

	
	EBAY INC.
	
	By:
	 /s/ Michael R. Jacobson

	 Secretary
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0660

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

JOSHUA DUANE WOLFBLACK,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 29, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 2 2023

06/02/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0660
#### Louise Mucciola, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of John B. Mucciola, Deceased, et al., Appellants, v City of New York, Respondent.

Submitted December 18, 1996;

decided February 15, 1996

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that movant has failed to demonstrate timeliness as required by section 500.11 (d) (1) (iii) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11 [d] [1] [iii]).
#### The American Seeding Machine Company, Appellant, v. John Conklin Sons Company, Respondent, Impleaded with Clark M. Sharpe.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

All concurred.
**Exhibit 32.1**

#### ** **

#### **SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS**

#### ** **

ThisCertificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section 1350of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of theUnited States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 ofthe Securities Act of 1934, as amended.

 

Theundersigned, who are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer ofBehringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc. (the “Company”), each herebycertify as follows:

 

TheSpecial Financial Report on Form 10-K of the Company (the “Report”), whichaccompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| Dated this 31st day of  March, 2008. |                    |
|--------------------------------------|-------------------------|
|                                 |                    |
|                                 |                    |
|                                 | /s/ Robert M. Behringer |
|                                 | Robert M. Behringer,    |
|                                 | Chief Executive Officer |
|                                 |                    |
|                                 |                    |
|                                 | /s/ Gary S. Bresky      |
|                                 | Gary S. Bresky,         |
|                                 | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Frank Rizzo, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Xenacare Holdings, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 15, 2008

| |                    
| | -------------------
| |                    
| | /s/ Frank Rizzo    
| | Frank Rizzo        
| | President, Director
STYLE:

v. FILECOPY


### RE: Case No. 15-0189 DATE: 6/12/2015 COA #: 12-14-00299-CV TC#: 3-41298 MICHAEL KENNEDY THE TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS, AUSTIN, TEXAS, ET AL. 

### Todaythe Supreme Court of Texas denied the petition for review in the above-referencedcase.

MS. CATHY S. LUSK CLERK, TWELFTH COURT OFAPPE 

### 1517 WEST FRONT, SUITE 

### TYLER, TX 75702
exhibit_1026.htm






  



  







  





Exhibit 10.26 









Orion Marine Group, Inc.

Non-employees Director Compensation





In November 2008, the Orion Marine Group, Inc. (the “Company”) Board of Directors adopted the annual non-employee director compensation program (effective for 2009) summarized below:






	
A.  
	
Board of Directors









	
1.  
	
Cash Compensation

	
a.  
	
Annual Retainer: $35,000









	
b.  
	
Additional Chairman Retainer:  $25,000

	
c.  
	
Meeting Fee: $1,000 per regular meeting; no separate compensation for special meetings.









	
d.  
	
Reimbursement of travel and related business expenses.









	
2.  
	
Equity Compensation

	
a.  
	
At the particular director’s option, annual grants to each independent director of Company restricted stock or stock options with an economic value of $35,000 at the time of grant to each director.









	
b.  
	
Grants for 2009 to occur 30 days after the Company’s 2009 Stockholder’

	  	
Meeting (May 14, 2009)









	
B.  
	
Audit Committee









	
1.  
	
Chair Annual Retainer: $12,500.

	
2.  
	
Member Annual Retainer: $ 7,000.









	
3.  
	
Meeting Fee: $1,000 per regular meeting; no separate compensation for special meetings .









	
C.  
	
Compensation Committee









	
1.  
	
Chair Annual Retainer: $7,000.

	
2.  
	
Member Annual Retainer: $5,000.









	
3.  
	
Meeting Fee: $1,000 per regular meeting; no separate compensation for special meetings.









	
D.  
	
Nominating & Governance Committee









	
1.  
	
Chair Annual Retainer: $7,000

	
2.  
	
Member Annual Retainer: $5,000.









	
3.  
	
Meeting Fee: $1,000 per regular meeting; no separate compensation for special meetings.








The grants to each independent director were issued on June 22, 2009.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

CLAY CALDWELL, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

HON. JEFFREY R. MINEHART, 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 74 EM 2014 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 8th day of August, 2014, the Application for Leave to File Original 

Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED. The 

Prothonotary is directed to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.
#### William Alva CARTE, Appellant, v. John C. TAYLOR, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas, Appellee.

No. 8051.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

June 22, 1965.

*365William Alva Carte, pro se.

Benjamin E. Franklin, Asst. U. S. Atty., Topeka, Kan. (Newell A. George, U. S. Atty., Topeka, Kan., with him on the brief), for appellee.

Before PICKETT, LEWIS and SETH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the District of Kansas, dismissing, without a hearing, Carte’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Carte was sentenced in the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri and is serving his sentence in the United States Penitentiary at Leavenworth, Kansas. The petition alleges only that the sentence is void because of ambiguity. The remedy provided for in 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is exclusive unless it is shown to be inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of the detention. Barkan v. United States, 10 Cir., 341 F.2d 95; Oughton v. United States, 10 Cir., 310 F. 2d 803, cert. denied 373 U.S. 937, 83 S. Ct. 1542, 10 L.Ed.2d 693; Sanchez v. Taylor, 10 Cir., 302 F.2d 725, cert. denied 371 U.S. 864, 83 S.Ct. 124, 9 L.Ed.2d 101; Black v. United States, 10 Cir., 301 F.2d 418, cert. denied 370 U.S. 932, 82 S.Ct. 1618, 8 L.Ed.2d 832; Martin v. Taylor, 10 Cir., 296 F.2d 739.

There being no allegations in the petition which indicate that the remedy provided for in Section 2255 is inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of the prisoner’s detention, there was no error in dismissing the petition without a hearing.

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-150386) of Apple REIT Eight, Inc. and in the related Prospectus of our reports dated March 11, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Apple REIT Eight, Inc., and the  effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Apple REIT Eight, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2010.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Richmond, VirginiaMarch 11, 2011