alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0001058438
<NAME> CFS BANCORP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          24,300
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,488
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    314,676
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         259,974
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           250,894
<LOANS>                                        992,332
<ALLOWANCE>                                      6,751
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,689,446
<DEPOSITS>                                     933,443
<SHORT-TERM>                                   456,300
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             31,438
<LONG-TERM>                                     67,836
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           283
<OTHER-SE>                                     200,196
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,689,446
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 19,184
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               10,324
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   998
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                30,506
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              10,959
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,966
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           11,540
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      375
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (7)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,688
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,030
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       5,030
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,042
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.41
<LOANS-NON>                                      9,190
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 1,560
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 10,750
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 6,452
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       96
<RECOVERIES>                                        20
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                6,751
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               100
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          6,651


</TABLE>
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 20

- 00191

- CV

N ICHOLS F ORD , L TD

. D / B / A A UTO N ATION F ORD S OUTH F ORT W ORTH
, AND T RUIST B ANK F / K / A S UN T RUST B ANK
, Appellants

V

.

M ARK G ARZA AND S T EPHANIE G ARZA
, Appellees §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 96th District Court

of Tarrant County ( 096

- 315652

- 20 )

September 2

, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was error in the trial court’s order

. It is ordered that the trial court ’ s order denying

arbitration is reversed

. W e release our July 16, 2020 stay of the trial court proceedings,

and the case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedin gs n ot in consistent

with this opinion

.It is further ordered that A ppell ees Mark Garza and Stephanie Garza must pay

all costs of this appeal

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _ /s/ Elizabeth Kerr

__________________ Justice Elizabeth Kerr
Exhibit 34.1.3

 

[Letterhead of Deloitte & Touche LLP]

 

**REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

Board of Directors and Shareholders

EMC Mortgage Corporation

 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in the paragraph’s 1 through 4 in the accompanying Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that EMC Mortgage Corporation (a wholly owned subsidiary of The Bear Stearns Companies Inc.) (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the asset-backed securities transactions for which the Company acted as servicer involving first and second lien, prime and sub-prime residential mortgage loans, that were completed on or after January 1, 2006 and that were registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the”Platform”) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), (d)(3)(i)C, (d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii), (d)(4)(xiii), and(d)(4)(xv) which management has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform.  Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria during the specified period, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed transaction included inthe Platform. Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007 for the Platform is fairly stated in all material respects.

 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

 

Dated: March 14, 2008
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 18

- 00117

- CV

HAYMORE ENTERPRISES, DBA GOLDEN CHICK
v. ROBERT A. CASE

On Appeal from the County Court of Bee County , Texas Trial Cause No. CV5140

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cau se on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against
appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
August 9, 201 8
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,069
<SECURITIES>                                        23
<RECEIVABLES>                                      459
<ALLOWANCES>                                        17
<INVENTORY>                                        337
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,401
<PP&E>                                           8,178
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,556
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,898
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,802
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              603
<PREFERRED>                                        237
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         122
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,898
<SALES>                                          5,497
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,497
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,248
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    54
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,972
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 161
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    195
<INCOME-TAX>                                        77
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                118
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       118
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.29


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

                                   906 Insert

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Form 10-Q of BigStar Entertainment, Inc. (the
"Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Friedensohn,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         1)       the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2)       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                       Name:



November 18, 2002                      /s/ DAVID FRIEDENSOHN
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       David Friedensohn
                                       Chief Executive Officer


                                       17
1 ... SeeTe x. R. App . P. 47. 4. 

## COURT OFAPPEALS SECOND DISTRICTOF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2 - 09 - 33 4- CV DO ROTH Y M ENEF EE , I ND I VI DU ALLY APPE L L AN TS AN D A S NEXT F RI END O F EVOLL A TU TT AN D EVO L L A TU TT V . LO U I S E. CO STELLO , M . D . , A PPELL EES J A C Q U E L IN E A . F R A Z E R , M .D ., AD ELZAKH ARY , M . D. , M I D- CI TI ES NEURO L O GY ASSO CI ATES, P. A. , SCO TT H A L L , M .D ., J A M E S M . B A R R Y , M .D ., L E W IS J O N E S , M .D ., D A N A LLA N W A D D ELL, D . O . , ETA L.

----- ----- FR O M THE 6 7TH DI STRI CT CO URT O F TARRA NT CO UN TY

----- ----- 

### MEMORANDU M OPI NI ON 1 

### AND J UDGME NT

----- ----- W eh a v ec o n s i d e re d a p p e l l a n ts ’ “M o ti o n T o D i s m i s sN o ti c eo f A p p e a l .” I ti s t he co urt ’ s op i ni on t ha tt he m oti on sho ul d b e g r an t ed ; t he r e fo re , w e d i s m i s sth ea p p e a l . SeeT e x . R . A p p . P . 4 2 .1 (a )(1 ), 4 3 .2 (f).2

C os t s oft he ap pea ls hal l bepa i d byap pel l ant s, f orw hi ch l etex ec ut i on i s s u e . SeeT e x . R . A p p . P . 4 2 .1 (d ). P E RCU R I AM PA N EL: DA U PH I N O T, G A RD N ER, an d W A LKER, JJ. DEL I VERE D: Oct ob e r15, 2009
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 9426]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257-1 of December 11, 2015), I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Unfinished: Thoughts Left Visible,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York, from on or about March 18, 2016, until on or about September 4, 2016, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        For further information, including a list of the imported objects, contact the Office of Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs in the Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

Dated: January 21, 2016.

Mark Taplin,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2016-01766 Filed 1-28-16; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20 - 0077 CITY OF WHITEFISH ,

Plaintiff and Appellee,
v. PHILIP ARGALL,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 8, 20 20 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 30 2020

07/30/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0077
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5713 

To require the Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere 

to conduct an assessment of cultural and historic resources in the waters 

of the Great Lakes, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 14, 2014 

Ms. KAPTUR (for herself and Mr. BENISHEK) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To require the Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans 

and Atmosphere to conduct an assessment of cultural 

and historic resources in the waters of the Great Lakes, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Great Lakes Maritime 

5 Heritage Assessment Act of 2014’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5713 IH

1 SEC. 2. ASSESSMENT OF CULTURAL AND HISTORIC RE2 SOURCES IN WATERS OF GREAT LAKES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the 

4 date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary 

5 of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere shall— 

6 (1) conduct an assessment of cultural and his7 toric resources in the waters of the Great Lakes; 

8 and 

9 (2) submit to the Committee on Commerce, 

10 Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the 

11 Committee on Natural Resources of the House of 

12 Representatives a report on the findings of the 

13 Under Secretary with respect to such assessment. 

14 (b) ELEMENTS.—The report required by subsection 

15 (a)(2) shall include the following: 

16 (1) Identification of underwater geographic 

17 areas in the Great Lakes that possess historical and 

18 archaeological resources of sufficient value and den19 sity to make them nationally significant. 

20 (2) A description of the historical and archae21 ological resources in such geographic areas. 

22 (3) An evaluation of community interest in pre23 serving and interpreting such resources. 

24 (4) A recommendation regarding whether such 

25 geographic areas should be designated as national 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5713 IH

1 marine sanctuaries to protect resources of historical 

2 and archeological significance. 

3 (5) Recommendations regarding whether the 

4 designation of a network of underwater Great Lakes 

5 areas that protect resources of historical and archeo6 logical significance, including the existing successful 

7 Thunder Bay National Marine Sanctuary, could 

8 bring significant educational opportunities, economic 

9 development, jobs, and tourism to the Great Lakes 

10 region. 

11 (c) COLLABORATION.—In carrying out this section, 

12 the Under Secretary shall collaborate with local commu13 nities. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA Ex Rel. TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMISSION v. J. W. CANADY et al.

(Filed 21 September, 1932.)

Appeal and Error K c — Petition to rehear this case is denied.

Where a petition to rehear a case is based upon the insufficiency of the evidence of defendant’s title to the lands in controversy, and the matter has been considered on the appeal and it appears from the admissions of the parties, the manner of trial, and the evidence that the petition should be dismissed it will be so ordered. '

PbtitiON by plaintiff to rehear this ease, reported in 202 N. C., 840.

*I. M. Bailey, John D. Warticle and Nere E. Day for petitioner.*

*I. G. Wright for respondents.*

Stacy, C. J.

The point presently mooted is the sufficiency of the evidence to show title in the defendants to the *locus in quo. We*were not inadvertent to this assignment on the original hearing, albeit the argument was confined principally to whether the oyster bed in question was covered by navigable or nonnavigable waters.

Considering the manner in which the case was tried, the admissions and other matters appearing of record, we are of opinion that the petition to rehear should be dismissed.

In the original petition, filed by the petitioner herein, the property was described by metes and bounds, alleged to be owned by J. *W.*Canady, and to contain 12.34 acres, more or less. On the hearing it was admitted, as appears from the charge and the judgment, “that 12.34 is the acreage of the land covered by water described in the petition.” It was also in evidence that the defendant, and those under whom he claims, had been in possession of the oyster garden in question for forty or forty-five years.

Petition dismissed.
Número Identificador

RES20 2 4

_________

ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO

TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES

PANEL ESPECIAL

LEARN AID, LLC

Recurrente

v.

DEPARTAMENTO DE EDUCACIÓN

Parte Recurrida

EDICIONES SANTILLANA, INC.; SM, IN.; GFS CREW LLC; PEARSONA PEM P.R. INC.; STEM REVOLUTION

LLC

Parte s con Interés KL RA202 400015 R evisión

Administrativa

p rocedente de

Decisión

Administrativa sobre la Adjudicación RFP

DEP R

- UAF

- 22

- 010 del Departamento de

Educación

Sobr e:

Errores de la Oficina Central de Compras, Obligaciones y Adjudicación de

Fondos del Departamento de

Educación de P uerto

R ico

Panel integrado por su president a , la Jueza Ort iz Flores

, el Juez

Rivera Torres y la Jueza Rivera Pérez

Rivera Pérez, Juez a Ponente

SENTENCIA

En San Juan, Puerto Rico, a 23 de febrero de 2024

.

Examinado el Aviso de Desistimiento presentado por Learn Aid

LLC el 22 de febrero de 2024, el Tribunal dispone:

Ha Lugar. En consecuencia, se ordena el cierre y archivo del

recurso del presente caso de conformidad con la Regla 83 (A) del

Reglamento del Tribunal de Apelaciones 1

.

Lo acordó y manda el Tribunal, y certifica la Secretaria del

Tribunal de Apelaciones.

Lcda. Lilia M. Oquendo Sol í s Secretaria del Tribunal de Apelaciones

1 4 LPRA Ap. XXII

- B, R. 83(A).