alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5562 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5562

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 801 West Ocean Avenue in Lompoc, California, as the ``Federal 
Correctional Officer Scott J. Williams Memorial Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SCOTT J. WILLIAMS MEMORIAL POST 
              OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 801 West Ocean Avenue in Lompoc, California, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Federal Correctional Officer Scott J. Williams 
Memorial Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Federal 
Correctional Officer Scott J. Williams Memorial Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 8, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5562

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 801 West Ocean Avenue in Lompoc, California, as the ``Federal 
Correctional Officer Scott J. Williams Memorial Post Office Building''.
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 235 (Thursday, December 7, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 62838]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-29794]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. GT96-33-000]


Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Refund Report

December 1, 1995.
    Take notice that on November 2, 1995, Tennessee Gas Pipeline 
Company (Tennessee) tendered for filing with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission (Commission) a refund report pursuant to the 
Commission's February 22, 1995, order issued in Docket No. RP95-124-
000.
    Tennessee states that it has refunded to its customers the Gas 
Research Institute's (GRI) refunds to Tennessee of the GRI's 1994 
overcollections from Tennessee. Tennessee states that it is allocating 
the $71,448.00 refund from GRI on a pro rata basis to firm 
transportation customers that received nondiscounted service during 
1994, based on each such customer's share of GRI rate adjustment 
payments to Tennessee during 1994.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions 
or protests should be filed on or before December 8, 1995. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion 
to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-29794 Filed 12-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONI, Terrance J. Lillis, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D requiredto be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of PrincipalLife Income Fundings Trust 2007-3 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report isincluded in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in thisreport under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement(s) in all material respects; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be includedin this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A. and Bankers Trust Company, N.A.Date: March 27, 2008   /s/ Terrance J. Lillis   Terrance J. Lillis  Chief Financial Officer- Retirement and Investor Services
EXHIBIT 12.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to Qiao Xing
Mobile, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under
our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of Qiao Xing Mobiles disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in Qiao Xing Mobiles internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the period
covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, Qiao Xing Mobiles internal
control over financial reporting; and
  a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect Qiao Xing Mobiles ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a
significant role in Qiao Xing Mobiles internal
control over financial reporting.
 Date: June 30, 2009
    By:
    /s/ David LiDavid LiChief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)




In connection with the Annual Report of Tiger Oil and Energy, In., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Kenneth B Liebscher, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date: August 30 , 2011/s/ Kenneth B LiebscherKenneth B Liebscher CEO
EX-35.3
(logo) GMAC RFC

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (Item 1123)

Residential Funding Company, LLC

Carrington Mortgage Loan Trust, Series 2007-RFC1 (the "Issuing Entity")


The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Residential Funding Company, LLC,
as servicer (the "Servicer") pursuant to the applicable servicing agreement,
does hereby certify that:

1. A review of the Servicer's activities during the period covered by the
Issuing Entity's report on Form 10-K and of the Servicer's performance under
the applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in
all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this
14th day of March 2008.



By: /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
Name: Anthony N. Renzi
Title: Managing Director
a6023095ex10_1.htm


    Exhibit
10.1

    


    


    iParty
Corp.

    


    COMPENSATION
ARRANGEMENTS WITH INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS FOR SERVICE

    COMMENCING
AFTER ELECTION AT THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

    


    May
27, 2009

    


    


    Equity
Compensation

    


         Each
independent director (i.e., each of Daniel DeWolf, Frank Haydu, Eric Schindler,
and Joseph Vassalluzzo) shall be granted an option as of May 27, 2009
exercisable for the purchase of 25,000 shares of iParty's common stock in
respect of his service as a director. Each such option shall have an exercise
price equal to $0.11 per share, the market price of iParty's common stock at the
close of business on the grant date (i.e., May 27, 2009) and shall vest
quarterly in equal parts over one year, vesting in full on May 27,
2010.

    


         Each
of these stock option grants shall be made pursuant to iParty's 2009 Stock
Incentive Plan.

    


    


    Cash
Compensation

    


         Each
independent director shall be paid $25,000 in cash, payable in equal quarterly
installments, for his service as a director for the year beginning on the date
of his election at the stockholders meeting on May 27, 2009.

    


         Each
independent director shall be paid an annual fee of the following amount in
cash, payable in equal quarterly installments, for service on the various
committees of the Board of Directors:

     

    
      
        
          
            
              
                	
                        Joseph
      Vassalluzzo

                      	 	$	25,000	 
	
                        Eric
      Schindler

                      	 	$	10,000	 
	
                        Daniel
      DeWolf

                      	 	$	10,000	 
	
                        Frank
      Haydu

                      	 	$	35,000
1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP

425 Lexington Ave

New York, NY 10017

Exhibit B

COMPENSATION BY WORK TASK CODE FOR SERVICES RENDERED BY 

SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP FOR THE PERIOD 

OCTOBER 1, 2019 THROUGH OCTOBER 31, 2019

Task Code Description Hours Amount

AA Asset Analysis and Recovery

AD Asset Disposition

BO Business Operations

BU Budgeting (Case)

CA Case Administration 0.80 $560.00

CC Creditor Communications

CG Corporate Governance and Board Matters 204.60 $223,422.00

CH Court Hearings 10.20 $10,735.50

CM Claims Administration and Objections 42.50 $35,510.00

EC Executory Leases and Contracts

EE Employee Benefits/Pensions

ES Equityholder Communications

FA Fee/Employment Applications 37.80 $40,838.00

FI Financings/Cash Collateral

FO Fee/Employment Application Objections 13.30 $14,366.00

FR Fact Analysis and Related Advice

IC Intercompany Issues

IP Intellectual Property Issues 

LI Litigation: Contested Matters and Adversary 

Proceedings 0.80 $1,228.00

LS Relief From Stay Proceedings

PL Plan/Disclosure Statement 131.40 $179,515.50

RE Reporting

TV1 Non-Working Travel Time

TX Tax Issues

 1 Time billed to this task code is billed and treated in accordance with the Fee Guidelines and Local Rules. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5221-2 Filed: 12/30/19 Entered: 12/30/19 11:41:14 Page 1

of 3
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP

425 Lexington Ave

New York, NY 10017

Task Code Description Hours Amount

VA Valuation

L110 Fact Investigation/Development

L120 Analysis/Strategy

L130 Experts/Consultants

L143 Discovery - Identification and Preservation

L160 Settlement/Non-Binding ADR

L200 Pre-Trial Pleadings and Motions 82.00 $94,578.00

L241 Motion to Dismiss: Preemption

L242 Motion to Dismiss: Lack of Subject Matter 

Jurisdiction

L243 Motion for Summary Judgment: Kongros

L244 Motion for Summary Judgment: Causation

L245 Motion for Summary Judgment: Employment

L246 Motion for Summary Judgment: Recreational 

Use Immunity

L310 Written Discovery

L330 Depositions

L350 Discovery Motions

L400 Trial Preparation and Trial

L500 Appeal

L600 eDiscovery - Identification

L610 eDiscovery - Preservation

L620 eDiscovery - Collection

L630 eDiscovery - Processing 1.00 $420.00

L650 eDiscovery - Review

L653 eDiscovery - First Pass Document Review

L654 eDiscovery - Second Pass Document Review

L655 eDiscovery - Privilege Review

L656 eDiscovery - Redaction

L670 eDiscovery - Production

L671 eDiscovery - Conversion of ESI to Production

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5221-2 Filed: 12/30/19 Entered: 12/30/19 11:41:14 Page 2

of 3
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP

425 Lexington Ave

New York, NY 10017

Task Code Description Hours Amount

L680 eDiscovery - Presentation

L800 Experts/Consultants

L900 Settlement Process

TOTAL 524.40 $601,173.00

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5221-2 Filed: 12/30/19 Entered: 12/30/19 11:41:14 Page 3

of 3
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 27, 2014

p0519

Order 

Clerk

May 27, 2014

148264

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148264

COA: 307027

Ionia CC: 2010-014984-FH

DANIEL ROGER CORDER, II,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 22, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Robert Mattison, Appellant, v. Hiland Hill Wheeler and others, Respondents.

— Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Smith, P. J.;

Haight, J., not fitting.
Letter Amendment to Employment Agreement between SGS and Robert Dechant



 EXHIBIT 10.3 
  
  

							
	 


	 		 		 	 20 William Street,
 Suite 310
 Wellesley, MA 02481
 781-304-1800 phone
 781-304-1701 fax
 www.stream.com


 May 6, 2009 
 Mr. Robert Dechant 
 Stream Global Services, Inc. 
 20 William Street, Suite 310 
 Wellesley, MA 02481 
 Dear Bob: 
 Stream Global Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and you hereby agree to
amend the employment agreement dated as of August 7, 2008, as amended on December 29, 2008, by and between the Company and you (the “Agreement”), as follows: 
 The last sentence in Section 3.4 is deleted in its entirety and replaced by inserting at the end the following: 
 “Up to 40 hours of unused vacation time accrued by the Executive at the end of any fiscal year shall be carried over in full to the next year.” 
 Except as modified by this letter or by other intervening amendments, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. This letter may be executed in counterparts, each of which
shall be deemed to be an original, and all of which shall constitute one and the same document. 
 STREAM GLOBAL SERVICES,
INC. 
 By:  /s/    R. Scott
Murray                                     
         R. Scott Murray 
         Chief Executive Officer 
 Acknowledged and agreed: 
 /s/  Robert
Dechant                                     
 Robert Dechant 
 Date
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5617 

To amend title 17, United States Code, with respect to the definition of 

‘‘widow’’ and ‘‘widower’’, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 

Mr. KILMER (for himself, Mr. CAPUANO, Mr. CICILLINE, Mr. CONNOLLY, Ms. 

DELBENE, Mr. DEUTCH, Ms. ESTY, Ms. HAHN, Mr. HANNA, Ms. LEE

of California, Ms. LOFGREN, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. 

MORAN, Mr. MURPHY of Florida, Mr. NADLER, Mr. POLIS, Mr. RANGEL, 

Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. TAKANO, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. 

BLUMENAUER, Ms. SCHWARTZ, Mr. SWALWELL of California, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. SMITH of Washington, Mr. HIMES, Ms. KUSTER, Mr. PETERS

of California, Ms. MENG, and Ms. BROWNLEY of California) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 17, United States Code, with respect to 

the definition of ‘‘widow’’ and ‘‘widower’’, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Copyright and Mar5 riage Equality Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5617 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF WIDOW AND WIDOWER IN TITLE 17, 

2 UNITED STATES CODE. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 101 of title 17, United 

4 States Code, is amended by striking the definition of 

5 ‘‘ ‘widow’ or ‘widower’ ’’ and inserting the following: 

6 ‘‘An individual is the ‘widow’ or ‘widower’ of an 

7 author if the courts of the State in which the indi8 vidual and the author were married (or, if the indi9 vidual and the author were not married in any State 

10 but were validly married in another jurisdiction, the 

11 courts of any State) would find that the individual 

12 and the author were validly married at the time of 

13 the author’s death, whether or not the spouse has 

14 later remarried.’’. 

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

16 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to the death of any 

17 author that occurs on or after the date of the enactment 

18 of this Act. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 37135

STATE OF IDAHO

,

Plaintiff-Respondent

,

v.

JASON ROBERT BERNARD

,

Defendant-Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2010 Unpublished O pinion No. 566

Filed: July 27, 2010

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, S tate of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Patrick H. Owen , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of three years, with a minimum period of confinement of four months

, for felony injury to a jail

, affirmed

.

Molly J. Huskey, State Appellate Public Defender; Jason C. Pintler, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Att orney General; Kenneth K. Jorgensen, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

______________________________________________

Before LANSING, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and GRATTON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Jason Robert Bernard pled guilty to felony injury to a jail . I.C. § 18

- 7018 . The district

court sentenced Bernard to a unified term of three years, with a minimum period of confinement

of four months

. Bernard appeals.

S entencing is a matter for the trial court ’ s discretion. Both our standard of review and the

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

-
15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.

1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho2

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Bernard ’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 17 (Wednesday, January 27, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 4627]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-01579]

[[Page 4627]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

[Petition No. P1-16]

Petition of COSCO Container Lines Company Limited for an 
Exemption From Commission Regulations; Notice of Filing and Request for 
Comments

    This is to provide notice of filing and to invite comments on or 
before February 12, 2016, with regard to the Petition described below.
    COSCO Container Lines Company Limited (``COSCON'') (Petitioner), 
has petitioned the Commission pursuant to 46 CFR 502.76 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, for an exemption from the 
Commission's rules requiring individual service contract amendments, 46 
CFR 530.10. Specifically, Petitioner explains that ``[o]n or about 
March 1, 2016, COSCON will acquire by time charter the containerships 
and certain other assets of China Shipping Container Lines Co. (``China 
Shipping'')'' and, as such, requests that the Commission permit the 
submission of a ``universal notice to the Commission and to the service 
contract parties'' instead of filing an amendment for each of the seven 
hundred (700) service contracts that will be assigned to COSCON. In 
addition COSCON proposes to send electronic notice to each shipper 
counter party. Because China Shipping tariffs will be taken over by 
COSCON and renumbered and republished, COSCON also seeks a waiver to 
avoid amending each contract with the new tariff number, by publishing 
a notice of the change in the existing China Shipping and COSCON 
tariffs.
    The Petition in its entirety is posted on the Commission's Web site 
at http://www.fmc.gov/p1-16. Comments filed in response to this 
Petition will be posted on the Commission's Web site at this location.
    In order for the Commission to make a thorough evaluation of the 
Petition, interested persons are requested to submit views or arguments 
in reply to the Petition no later than February 12, 2016. Commenters 
must send an original and 5 copies to the Secretary, Federal Maritime 
Commission, 800 North Capitol Street NW., Washington, DC 20573-0001, 
and be served on Petitioner's counsel, Robert B. Yoshitomi, or Eric C. 
Jeffrey, Nixon Peabody LLP, 799 9th Street NW., Washington, DC 20001. A 
PDF copy of the reply must also be sent as an attachment to 
[email protected]. Include in the email subject line ``Petition No P1-
16.''

Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-01579 Filed 1-26-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6731-AA-P
```