alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Rory J. Cowan, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Lionbridge Technologies, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SECtransition instructions contained in SEC Release No. 34-47986]; 

 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date:August 6, 2004 

 

 

1
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4879 Filed: 11/26/19 Entered: 11/26/19 20:06:46 Page 1 of

1
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Stephen J. Lifshatz, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Lionbridge Technologies, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained in SEC Release No. 34-47986]; 

 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 5, 2004
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2769-1    Filed: 06/26/19    Entered: 06/26/19 16:48:42    Page 1of 2

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2769-1    Filed: 06/26/19    Entered: 06/26/19 16:48:42    Page 2of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Financial
Statements for the three (3) months ended March 31, 2000, and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such form 10-QSB for quarterly period ended March
31, 2000.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                          <C>


<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  Mar-31-2000
<CASH>                                              2,929
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                         7,060
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   35,489
<PP&E>                                          1,435,286
<DEPRECIATION>                                     83,088
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  2,902,755
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             213,233
<BONDS>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                            1,107
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      1,716,986
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    2,902,755
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       37
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     200,315
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (200,278)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (200,278)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (406,425)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (606,703)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.06)



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 236 (Friday, December 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63056-63057]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-29961]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 63057]]


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated August 10, 1995, and published in the Federal 
Register on August 17, 1995, (60 FR 42905), Dupont Pharmaceuticals, The 
Dupont Merck Pharmaceutical Company, 1000 Stewart Avenue, Garden City, 
New York 11530, made application to the Drug Enforcement Administration 
(DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of 
controlled substances listed below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule         
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oxycodone (9143)...........................  II                         
Hydrocodone (9193).........................  II                         
Oxymorphone (9652).........................  II                         
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has determined 
that the registration of Dupont Pharmaceuticals to manufacture the 
listed controlled substances is consistent with the public interest at 
this time. Therefore, pursuant to Section 303 of the Comprehensive Drug 
Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970 and Title 21, Code of Federal 
Regulations, Section 1301.54(e), the Deputy Assistant Administrator, 
Office of Diversion Control, hereby orders that the application 
submitted by the above firm for registration as a bulk manufacturer of 
the basic classes of controlled substances listed above is granted.

    Dated: November 29, 1995.
Gene R. Haislip,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 95-29961 Filed 12-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5386 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5386

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 18, 2014

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 11662 Gravois Road in St. Louis, Missouri, as the ``Lt. Daniel P. 
                         Riordan Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LT. DANIEL P. RIORDAN POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 11662 Gravois Road in St. Louis, Missouri, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Lt. Daniel P. Riordan Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lt. Daniel 
P. Riordan Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 17, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.0

|   | (1) | The      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended      March 31, 2008 (Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78m(a) or      78o(d), and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | May      5, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Thomas F. Prisby                                          |
|--------|------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |             |   | Thomas      F. Prisby                                         |
|   |             |   | Chairman      of the Board andChief      Executive Officer    |
|   |             |   |                                                          |
|   |             |   |                                                          |
|   |             |   |                                                          |
| Date:  | May      5, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Charles V. Cole                                           |
|   |             |   | Charles      V. Cole                                          |
|   |             |   | Executive      Vice President andChief      Financial Officer |
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5505 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5505

To improve the establishment of any lower ground-level ozone standards, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 17, 2014

Mr. Olson (for himself, Mr. Latta, Mr. Shimkus, Mr. Weber of Texas, Mr. 
Cassidy, Mr. Flores, Mr. Smith of Texas, Mr. Hall, Mr. McClintock, Mr. 
 Hultgren, Mr. Tipton, Mr. McKinley, Mr. Smith of Missouri, Mr. Jones, 
Mrs. Noem, Mrs. Lummis, Mr. Pompeo, Mr. Harper, Mr. Brady of Texas, Mr. 
 Long, Mr. Johnson of Ohio, and Mr. Cuellar) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To improve the establishment of any lower ground-level ozone standards, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Clean Air, Strong Economies Act''.

SEC. 2. GROUND-LEVEL OZONE STANDARDS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law (including regulations), 
in promulgating a national primary or secondary ambient air quality 
standard for ozone, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection 
Agency--
            (1) shall not propose a national primary or secondary 
        ambient air quality standard for ozone that is lower than the 
        standard established under section 50.15 of title 40, Code of 
        Federal Regulations (as in effect on January 1, 2014), until at 
        least 85 percent of the counties that were nonattainment areas 
        under that standard as of January 1, 2014, achieve full 
        compliance with that standard;
            (2) shall only consider all or part of a county to be a 
        nonattainment area under the standard on the basis of direct 
        air quality monitoring;
            (3) shall take into consideration feasibility and cost; and
            (4) shall include in the regulatory impact analysis for the 
        proposed and final rule at least 1 analysis that does not 
        include any calculation of benefits resulting from reducing 
        emissions of any pollutant other than ozone.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-10491

Conference Calendar

 

DONALD RAY MCCRAY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JOHN B. TOLLE,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:96-CV-460-G

- - - - - - - - - -

October 29, 1996

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Donald Ray McCray appeals the district court’s dismissal of

his civil rights complaint. This court must examine the basis of

its jurisdiction on its own motion if necessary. Mosley v.

Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). Rule 4(a)(1), Fed. R.

App. P., requires that the notice of appeal in a civil action be

filed within 30 days of entry of the judgment or order from which

appeal is taken. However, “[i]f an inmate confined in an
No. 96-10491

- 2 -

institution files a notice of appeal in either a civil case or a

criminal case, the notice of appeal is timely filed if it is

deposited in the institution’s internal mail system on or before

the last day of filing.” Fed. R. App. P. 4(c). 

The district court entered final judgment on March 21, 1996. 

Therefore, the final day for filing a timely notice of appeal was

Monday April 22, 1996, because the thirtieth day was a Saturday. 

See Fed. R. App. P. 26(a). McCray’s notice of appeal was dated

April 27, 1996, and was not filed into the court record until May

2, 1996. Thus, it could not have been deposited in the prison’s

mail system within the prescribed appeal period. 

The time limitation for filing a notice of appeal is

jurisdictional, and the lack of a timely notice of appeal

mandates dismissal of the appeal. Robbins v. Maggio, 750 F.2d

405, 408 (5th Cir. 1985).

We remind McCray that in McRoy v. Lower, No. 96-20516 (Aug.

21, 1996), he was barred by this court from filing any pro se, in

forma pauperis civil appeal in this court, or any pro se, in

forma pauperis, initial civil pleading in any court which is

subject to this court’s jurisdiction, without the advance written

permission of a judge of the forum court or of this court, and

that the clerk of this court and the clerks of all federal

district courts in this Circuit are directed to return to McCray,

unfiled, any attempted submission inconsistent with this bar. We

consider this appeal only because it was filed before this bar 
No. 96-10491

- 3 -

was imposed. To avoid additional sanctions McCray should review 

any pending appeals and withdraw any frivolous appeals

immediately. 

APPEAL DISMISSED.
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

January 7, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00945

- CR & 04

- 18

- 00946

- CR

Carlos Otilio GONZALEZ, Appellant

v.

T he STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2010CR6300A , 2010CR6301A Honorable Joey Contreras, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

In the interest of the efficient administration of the court ’ s docket, we ORDER Appeal Nos. 04

- 18

- 00945

- CR and 04

- 18

- 00946

- CR consolidated. The parties must file motions, briefs, and other pleadings as if the appeals were one but put both appeal numbers in the style of the case. However, a record must be filed in each appeal, the record in each case will remain separate and, if supplementation of the record becomes necessary, the supplemental material must be filed in the appeal to which it applies. The cases must be argued together in one brief, as in a single appeal, and if oral argument is requested and granted, the entire case must be argu ed as a single appeal, with the total time limit for each party equal to the ordinary time limit for a party in a single appeal. The court will dispose of both appeals in the same judgment, opinion, and mandate.

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel, the district clerk, and the court reporters.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 7th day of January, 2019

.___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
Professional Fees $ 4,941,332.00

Expenses 461,592.85

Total Invoice $ 5,402,924.85

Note: In accordance with the Order Granting Fee Examiner’s Motion to Approve Fee Procedures in the 

PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company chapter 11 cases, entered on November 15, 2019 

(the “Order”), this invoice is inclusive of compensation for fees associated with non-working airplane travel 

time incurred by AP Services, LLC professionals during the billing period. Per the Order, compensation is 

allowed in these cases for non-working airplane travel time up to two hours per professional per one-way 

trip. All fees associated with non-working airplane travel time incurred by AP Services, LLC professionals 

in excess of the two hour cap has been written off. The aggregate fees for excess non-working airplane travel 

time that has been absorbed by AP Services, LLC for the November 2019 billing period was $593,153.00.

Exhibit A

AP SERVICES, LLC

Summary of Compensation and Expenses – Pacific Gas and Electric Company, et al.

For the Period November 1, 2019 through November 30, 2019

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5335-1 Filed: 01/10/20 Entered: 01/10/20 10:06:47 Page 1

of 1
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofNew England Realty Associates Limited Partnership (the “Partnership”) onForm 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, HaroldBrown, the Treasurer and a Director of the Partnership’s General Partner,NewReal, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18.U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuantto § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)               The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2)               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial  condition and result of operations of thePartnership.

 

 
|   | /s/ HAROLD BROWN               |   |
|--------|--------------------------------|--------|
|   |                           |
|   | Harold Brown                   |
|   | Principal Financial            |
|   | Officer                        |
|   | (Treasurer and Director of     |
|   | the Partnership’s General |
|   | Partner,                       |
|   | NewReal, Inc.)            |

 

May 17, 2004

 

----