alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Manojkumar D. Patel (Admitted as Manoj Kumar Dahyabhai Patel), an Attorney, Appellant. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Respondent.

Submitted February 13, 1996;

decided April 2, 1996

*1042Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as denied appellant’s motion for an order directing an investigation into alleged attorney misconduct, dismissed upon the ground that that part of the order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. George W. Stoughtenburgh, Appellant.

— Appeal dismissed. Followed. *(People*v. Havens, 3 Crim. Rep., 286.)
EX-35.2
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK
OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Re: The Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2006
(as amended, the "Agreement"), between Washington Mutual Bank, as Servicer and
Luminent Mortgage Capital, Inc. as Owner with respect to Luminent Mortgage Trust
2007-1 ("Luminent 2007-1")(the "Securitization").


I, H. John Berens, a Senior Vice President of Washington Mutual Bank (the
"Servicer"), certify to the Owner, the Depositor and the Master Servicer under
the Securitization, the following for the 2007 fiscal year (the "Relevant
Year"):


1. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the Relevant Year and of
performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects
throughout the Relevant Year.


Dated as of March 1, 2008.

/s/ H. John Berens
Name: H. John Berens
Title: Senior Vice President
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 241 (Friday, December 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64427-64428]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30525]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP96-95-000]


Koch Gateway Pipeline Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

December 11, 1995.
    Take notice that on December 4, 1995, Koch Gateway Pipeline Company 
(Koch Gateway), P.O. Box 1478, Houston, Texas 77251-1478, filed in 
Docket No. CP96-95-000 a request pursuant to Secs. 157.205 and 157.211 
of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 
157.205, 157.211) for authorization to operate as a jurisdictional 
facility, a delivery tap placed in service under Section 311(a) of the 
Natural Gas Policy Act and Sec. 284.3(c) of the Commission's 
Regulations, under Koch Gateway's blanket certificate issued in Docket 
No. 

[[Page 64428]]
CP82-430-000 pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as more 
fully set forth in the request that is on file with the Commission and 
open to public inspection.
    Koch Gateway states that the proposed certification of facilities 
will enable it to provide transportation under its blanket 
transportation certificate through an existing delivery tap serving 
Entex, Inc. a local distribution company, in Polk County, Texas.
    Koch Gateway asserts that it will operate the delivery tap in 
compliance with 18 CFR Part 157, Subpart F and that it has sufficient 
capacity to render the proposed service without detriment or 
disadvantage to its other existing customers.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Sec. 157.205 of the 
Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to the 
request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefore, the 
proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day 
after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and 
not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-30525 Filed 12-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Kyle Gotshalk, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of PSPP Holdings, Inc.



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.



4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in exchange act rules 13a-15(e) and 15d- 15(f)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;



c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: May 14, 2007



/s/ Kyle Gotshalk

Kyle Gotshalk,

Chief Executive Officer (or equivalent thereof)
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Meditecnic, Inc. (the "Company") on Form  10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof  (the "Report"),  I, Luc Badel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Luc Badel

By: Luc Badel

Chief Financial  Officer

December 15, 2008
Amendment to Relationship Agreement



 Exhibit 10.5 
 Upromise, Inc. 
 95 Wells Avenue, Suite 160 
 Newton, Massachusetts 02459 
 Telephone: 617-454-6400 
 Facsimile: 617-454-6360 
 August 3, 2009 
 Megan Flynn 
 Rewards Network Establishment Services Inc. 
 Two North Riverside Plaza, Suite 950 
 Chicago, IL 60606 
  

			
	RE:	  	Relationship Agreement

 Dear Megan: 
 Reference is made to that certain Relationship Agreement dated as of January 31, 2008, by and between Upromise, Inc. (“Upromise”) and Rewards Network Establishment Services Inc. (“RN”), as amended (the
“Agreement”). Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Agreement. 
 The purpose of this letter is to confirm the Parties’ agreement to amend the Agreement as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Section 3.1(e) is deleted in its entirety and replaced as follows: 

 The Parties agree that as soon as practicable, and when approved by Upromise, RN will include Upromise in RN’s mobile applications (including for example, an iPhone or Blackberry application), which may provide
view and search functions for Participating RN Restaurants. RN will promptly inform Upromise of any material changes to any such mobile applications. Upromise acknowledges that for any of RN’s mobile applications approved by Upromise, RN may
use Upromise Marks in accordance with the terms of this Agreement when such Upromise Marks are provided or approved by Upromise. Upromise acknowledges and agrees that the intellectual property used to operate RN’s mobile applications are the
sole and exclusive Intellectual Property Rights of RN. Upromise’s participation in RN’s mobile applications may be revoked by either Party upon not less than sixty (60) days prior written notice to the other Party. 
  

	 	2.	A new Section 3.1(f) is added: 

 The Parties agree
that from time to time, as agreed by the Parties, RN may operate a sweepstakes, contest or other promotion (a “Promotion”) in connection with the Upromise Dining Program by RN. RN represents that any such Promotion will be operated by it
or a third party in compliance with applicable law, and that Upromise will have a reasonable opportunity to review and approve all rules and requirements of such Promotion. Upromise acknowledges that for any Promotion, RN may use Upromise Marks in
accordance with the terms of this Agreement when such Upromise Marks are provided or approved by Upromise. 







 The Parties agree that this letter agreement constitutes an amendment of the Agreement and, except as
expressly amended, modified or supplemented in this letter agreement, all other provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
 Please arrange to have this letter signed by an authorized RN officer in the place provided below to signify RN’s agreement to these terms as of the date set forth above. Please return an original executed copy to us at your earliest
convenience. 
  

	
	Sincerely,
	
	 /s/ David Rochon

	David Rochon
	PResident


  

			
	AGREED AND ACCEPTED
	
	Rewards Network Establishment Services Inc.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Megan Flynn

	Name:	 	Megan Flynn
	Title:	 	SVP
		
	Date:	 	August 3, 2009
Exhibit 34.1.5.4

[Letterhead of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP]

 

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

To the Board of Directors of The First American Corporation:

 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance, that First American Real Estate Solutions of Texas, L.P.  (the “Company” and an indirect subsidiary of the First American Corporation), complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for all loans for residential and commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the residential and commercial tax service provider (the “Platform”), as of December 31, 2007 and for the year then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(i)-(iii), 122(d)(2)(i)-(iv), 1122(d)(3)(i)-(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i)-(x) and 1122(d)(4)(xiv)-(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Management’s assertion identifies theindividual securities defined by management as constituting the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and the servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurredprior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007 for all loans for residential and commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the residential and commercial tax service provider is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

February 12, 2008
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP

Stephen Karotkin (pro hac vice) 

(stephen.karotkin@weil.com) 

Ray C. Schrock, P.C. (pro hac vice) 

(ray.schrock@weil.com) 

Jessica Liou (pro hac vice) 

(jessica.liou@weil.com) 

Matthew Goren (pro hac vice) 

(matthew.goren@weil.com) 

767 Fifth Avenue 

New York, NY 10153-0119 

Tel: 212 310 8000 

Fax: 212 310 8007 

KELLER & BENVENUTTI LLP 

Tobias S. Keller (#151445) 

(tkeller@kellerbenvenutti.com) 

Jane Kim (#298192) 

(jkim@kellerbenvenutti.com) 

650 California Street, Suite 1900 

San Francisco, CA 94108 

Tel: 415 496 6723 

Fax: 650 636 9251 

Attorneys for Debtors and Debtors in Possession

CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP 

Paul H. Zumbro (pro hac vice) 

(pzumbro@cravath.com) 

Kevin J. Orsini (pro hac vice) 

(korsini@cravath.com) 

Omid H. Nasab (pro hac vice) 

(onasab@cravath.com) 

825 Eighth Avenue 

New York, NY 10019

Tel: 212 474 1000 

Fax: 212 474 3700 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION,

 - and - 

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY,

Bankruptcy Case No. 19-30088 (DM)

Chapter 11 

(Lead Case) (Jointly Administered) 

ORDER PURSUANT TO L.B.R. 9013-1(c) 

AUTHORIZING OVERSIZE BRIEFING FOR 

DEBTORS’ MOTION FOR ENTRY OF 

ORDERS (I) APPROVING EQUITY 

BACKSTOP COMMITMENT LETTERS AND 

DEBT FINANCING COMMITMENT 

LETTERS AND (II) AUTHORIZING 

PAYMENT AND ALLOWANCE OF 

RELATED FEES AND/OR PREMIUMS, 

INDEMNITIES, COSTS AND EXPENSES AS 

ADMINISTRATIVE CLAIMS

[No Hearing Requested] 

Debtors.

 Affects PG&E Corporation 

 Affects Pacific Gas and Electric 

Company 

 Affects both Debtors 

* All papers shall be filed in the Lead 

Case, No. 19-30088 (DM). 

Signed and Filed: October 25, 2019

________________________________________

DENNIS MONTALI

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

Entered on Docket 

October 25, 2019

EDWARD J. EMMONS, CLERK 

U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4479 Filed: 10/25/19 Entered: 10/25/19 14:25:08 Page 1 of

2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The Court, having reviewed the Ex Parte Application for Order Pursuant to L.B.R. 

9013-1(c) Authorizing Oversize Briefing for Debtors’ Motion for Entry of Orders (I) Approving 

Equity Backstop Commitment Letters and Debt Financing Commitment Letters and (II) Authorizing 

Payment and Allowance of Related Fees and/or Premiums, Indemnities, Costs and Expenses as 

Administrative Claims (the “Application”), filed on October 23, 2019; and after due deliberation 

and sufficient cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

1. The Application is granted, as provided herein. 

2. The Debtors are authorized to file and serve the Motion (as defined in the 

Application), in excess of 25 pages, but not to exceed 35 pages (exclusive of 

any schedules or exhibits thereto and/or any declarations filed in connection 

therewith). 

** END OF ORDER ** 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4479 Filed: 10/25/19 Entered: 10/25/19 14:25:08 Page 2 of

2
Project Category and Professional Hours

For the Period October 1, 2019 through October 31, 2019

Exhibit B

Position

PG&E Corporation, et al. (Case No. 19-30088 (DM))

PwC LLP - Management, Tax and Advisory Consultants to the Debtors

Total 

Compensation

Fixed Fee Services - Summary of Hours and Fees by Project and Professional 

North Bay & Camp Fire Services Retention Exhibit #: SUPP 01-C; 01-F

Meera Banerjee Partner 22.00

Todd Jirovec Partner 56.00

Amol Deshpande Director 126.00

Billy R Raley Director 162.00

Kristin A Cheek Director 20.10

Cyrus Justin Mohamadi Manager 119.00

Rachel M Ehsan Manager 107.70

AnnMarie Hassan Senior Associate 152.00

Jessica Burton Senior Associate 37.00

Joseph Michalek Senior Associate 56.50

Mohammad Ali Suleman Senior Associate 194.60

Ryan D McLean Senior Associate 168.00

Tyler McNeil Guthrie Senior Associate 181.50

Yurika Kristy Yoneda Senior Associate 68.90

Andrew James Breckel Associate 190.00

Emily Elizabeth Gray Associate 201.00

Subtotal - North Bay & Camp Fire Services 1,862.30 $668,338.00

Compliance Services Retention Exhibit #: 01-H

Kristin D Rivera Partner 13.20

Meera Banerjee Partner 42.50

Tania Fabiani Partner 2.00

Sumana Lahiry Director 55.70

Shu Ting Li Senior Manager 55.00

Yuliya Foerster Senior Manager 2.00

Clevian Hsia Associate 2.00

Kailey Sanchez Associate 358.10

Subtotal - Compliance Services 530.50 $190,500.00

Total - Hours and Compensation - Fixed Fee Services 2,392.80 $858,833.00

Monday, December 30, 2019

Page 1 of 1

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5231-2 Filed: 12/31/19 Entered: 12/31/19 09:57:55 Page 1

of 2
Project Category and Professional

Camp 

Fire 

Services 

Hours

For the Period October 1, 2019 through October 31, 2019

Exhibit B

Position

PG&E Corporation, et al. (Case No. 19-30088 (DM))

PwC LLP - Management, Tax and Advisory Consultants to the Debtors

North Bay & Camp Fire Services - Summary of Hours and Fees North 

Bay Fire 

Services 

Hours

North Bay & Camp Fire Services Retention Exhibit #: SUPP 01-C; 01-F

Meera Banerjee Partner 11.00 11.00

Todd Jirovec Partner 28.00 28.00

Amol Deshpande Director 63.00 63.00

Billy R Raley Director 40.50 121.50

Kristin A Cheek Director 10.05 10.05

Cyrus Justin Mohamadi Manager 59.50 59.50

Rachel M Ehsan Manager 53.85 53.85

AnnMarie Hassan Senior Associate 15.20 136.80

Jessica Burton Senior Associate 9.22 27.78

Joseph Michalek Senior Associate 5.65 50.85

Mohammad Ali Suleman Senior Associate 97.30 97.30

Ryan D McLean Senior Associate 84.00 84.00

Tyler McNeil Guthrie Senior Associate 0.00 181.50

Yurika Kristy Yoneda Senior Associate 34.45 34.45

Andrew James Breckel Associate 95.00 95.00

Emily Elizabeth Gray Associate 100.50 100.50

Subtotal - North Bay & Camp Fire Services 707.22 1,155.08

Total Compensation $330,528 $337,805

Monday, December 30, 2019

Page 1 of 1

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5231-2 Filed: 12/31/19 Entered: 12/31/19 09:57:55 Page 2

of 2
Exhibit 32.1

                Certification Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
     (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, Charles E. Hughes,  Jr., as Chief  Executive  Officer of Florida Banks,  Inc.
(the  "Company"),  certify,  pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  Section  1350 (as  adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002),  that  to my
knowledge:

1.   the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report  on Form 10-Q of the  Company  for the
     quarterly  period ended June 30, 2003 (the  "Report"),  filed with the U.S.
     Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of
     Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  and  Exchange  Act of 1934,  as
     amended; and

2.   the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: August 14, 2003                         /s/ Charles E. Hughes, Jr.
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Charles E. Hughes, Jr.
                                              Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2




Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of MEMSIC, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Patricia Niu, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:




1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: March 25, 2011





/S/ PATRICIA NIUPatricia NiuChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Derycz Scientific, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter Derycz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Peter DeryczPeter DeryczChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)September 28, 2011