alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0001058438
<NAME> CFS BANCORP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           9,468
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          72,328
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                78,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     23,946
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         509,348
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           511,534
<LOANS>                                        379,547
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,117
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,098,105
<DEPOSITS>                                     710,655
<SHORT-TERM>                                   105,326
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            213,479
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      68,645
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,098,105
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 13,921
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               15,928
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   657
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                30,506
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              17,289
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,718
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           11,788
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       60
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  9,152
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,973
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,973
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,455
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.40
<LOANS-NON>                                      4,860
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 2,051
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  4,426
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,094
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       40
<RECOVERIES>                                         3
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,117
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,117
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          3,117
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5653 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5653

To provide for recipients of community development block grant funds to 
    return such funds to the Treasury of the United States without 
                   prejudice, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 18, 2014

  Mr. Salmon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for recipients of community development block grant funds to 
    return such funds to the Treasury of the United States without 
                   prejudice, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``CDBG Grant Return Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. RETURN OF UNUSED GRANT FUNDS.

    Section 106 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 
(42 U.S.C. 5306) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subsection:
    ``(g) Return of Unused Grant Funds.--
            ``(1) Authority.--Any metropolitan city, urban county, unit 
        of general local government, Indian tribe, or insular area that 
        directly or indirectly receives amounts pursuant to this 
        section may, at the sole discretion of such entity, return to 
        the Treasury any or all of such amounts, subject to paragraph 
        (2).
            ``(2) Retention and use of 10 percent of return amount.--In 
        returning any amounts pursuant to this subsection, a 
        metropolitan city, urban county, unit of general local 
        government, Indian tribe, or insular area, such city, county 
        unit, tribe, or insular area may retain and use for any 
        purpose, at the discretion of such city, county unit, tribe, or 
        insular area and notwithstanding any other provision of this 
        title, an amount not exceeding \1/10\ of the total of such 
        amounts otherwise to be returned.
            ``(3) Treatment of future grant amounts.--Any return of 
        amounts pursuant to this subsection shall not in any manner 
        affect the future eligibility of such entity for grant funds 
        under this title or the amount of such grant funds provided.
            ``(4) Treatment of returned amounts.--Any amounts returned 
        to the Treasury pursuant to this subsection shall be covered 
        into the general fund and shall not be reallocated, 
        redistributed, or otherwise made available under this title.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Andre Boisvert, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Sagent Technology, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30,
2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Sagent Technology, Inc. and its subsidiaries.



|                |  |  | 
|--------------- |  |  | 
|August 14, 2003 |  |  | 
|                |  |  |
#### Daniel Bauza et al., Respondents, v Curtis Stubbs et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

[772 NYS2d 818]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered February 3, 2003, which granted plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability as against the Stubbs defendants, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Inasmuch as plaintiffs, in support of their motion, presented evidence showing that their vehicle, while stopped, was hit from behind by defendants’ vehicle, and appellants, in responding to the motion, submitted only the affirmation of counsel, who had no first-hand knowledge of the facts, the motion was properly granted *(see Mitchell v Gonzalez,*269 AD2d 250, 251 [2000]; *and see Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 563 [1980]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Ellerin and Friedman, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of Glowpoint, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Michael Brandofino, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for
purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that
to the best of my knowledge:

         1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company at the dates of and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date:  April 20, 2006

                                                       /s/ Michael Brandofino
                                                       -----------------------
                                                       Michael Brandofino
                                                       Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 21 (Tuesday, February 2, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 5436]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-01796]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP16-300-000]


Empire Pipeline, Inc.; Notice of Initiation of Section 5 
Proceeding

    On January 21, 2016, the Commission issued an order in Docket No. 
RP16-300-000, pursuant to section 5 of the Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S.C. 
717d (2012), instituting an investigation into the justness and 
reasonableness of Empire Pipeline, Inc.'s (Empire) currently effective 
tariff rates. The Commission's order directs Empire to file a full cost 
and revenue study within 75 days of the issuance of the order. Empire 
Pipeline, Inc., 154 FERC ]61,029 (2016).

    Dated: January 21, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-01796 Filed 2-1-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 22-0522

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

CODY JOSEPH VERNON FLESCH,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to the Court sitting en banc. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Ashley Harada, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 8 2024

05/08/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0522
Exhibit 33.5.2

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE

First American Real Estate Solutions of Texas, L.P. (an indirect subsidiary of The
First American Corporation and the Asserting Party) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2007, and for the period from January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007 (the Reporting Period) with
the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Sections 229.1122(d)(1)(iv), (d)(2)(v), (d)(2)(vi), (d)(2)(vii), (d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii) and (d)(4)(xiii) of the Code of Federal Regulations applicable to the Asserting Party (the Applicable
Servicing Criteria). The transactions covered by this report include all loans for residential and commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Asserting Party served as the residential and commercial tax service provider
(the Platform).

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has
concluded that the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2007, and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform taken as a whole.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2007, and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.



|                                                    |  |                                         
|--------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|FIRST AMERICAN REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS OF TEXAS, L.P.
|By:                                                 |  | First American Real Estate Solutions LLC
|                                                    |  | General Partner                         
|                                                    | 
|                                                    |  | /s/ Lucy A. Przybyla                    
|                                                    |  | Lucy A. Przybyla                        
|                                                    |  | Senior Vice President                   
|                                                    |  | February 12, 2008
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of MEMSIC, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Dr. Yang Zhao, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 31, 2010



/S/ YANG ZHAOYang ZhaoPresident and Chief Executive Officer
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5605 

To disapprove an amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines relating to sentences for drug offenses which was transmitted to Congress by the 

United States Sentencing Commission on April 30, 2014, including any 

retroactive effect for that amendment. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 

Mr. HOLDING introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To disapprove an amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines 

relating to sentences for drug offenses which was transmitted to Congress by the United States Sentencing 

Commission on April 30, 2014, including any retroactive 

effect for that amendment. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Public Safe5 ty and Federal Resources Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5605 IH

1 SEC. 2. DISAPPROVAL OF UNITED STATES SENTENCING 

2 COMMISSION AMENDMENT RELATING TO 

3 SENTENCES FOR DRUG OFFENSES. 

4 In accordance with section 994(p) of title 28, United 

5 States Code, the amendment numbered 3 of the Amend6 ments to the Sentencing Guidelines submitted by the 

7 United States Sentencing Commission to Congress on 

8 April 30, 2014, is hereby disapproved and shall not take 

9 effect. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No. 333-152241 on
Form S-8 for Manhattan Bancorp of our report dated March 25, 2010, with respect to the consolidated statements of financial condition of Manhattan Bancorp as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, appearing in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Manhattan Bancorp for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.

/s/
VAVRINEK, TRINE, DAY & CO., LLP
Rancho Cucamonga, California
March 25, 2010

---



QuickLinks
# FILED February 27, 1998 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

JOHN WAYNE SLATE, SR. ) SEVIER COUNTY ) 03A01-9708-CV-00369 Petitioner-Appellant ) ) ) v . ) HON. CHESTER RAINWATER, JR., ) CHANCELLOR ) STATE OF TENNESSEE, et al. ) ) Defendants-Appellees ) AFFIRMED AND REMANDED

JOHN WAYNE SLATE, SR., Pro Se JOHN KNOX WALKUP, Attorney General and Reporter, and DAVID T. WHITEFIELD, Senior Counsel, Civil Rights and Claims Division, Nashville, For Appellees

O P I N I O N

Goddard, P.J.

John Wayne Slate, Sr., who is incarcerated in a penal institution of this State, appearing pro s e , appeals a judgment of the Chancery Court for Sevier County, which dismissed his complaint (which is styled a motion) seeking disbarment of Circuit Judge Ben Hooper and Attorney General Al Schmutzer, Jr.1 In Ex parte Chattanooga Bar Association , 566 S.W.2d 880

(Tenn.1978), our Supreme Court held that the provisions of T.C.A. 23-3-202, insofar as they address disciplinary proceedings against attorneys, had been superseded by Rule 42 of the Supreme Court, which is the predecessor to Rule 9 . 2

The Chancellor dismissed the complaint on the ground that proceedings to disbar an attorney must be pursuant to Rule 9 of the Supreme Court, rather than T.C.A. 23-3-202, 1 as alleged in the complaint.

Mr. Slate appeals contending that the Trial Court was in error in this regard and was also in error in not granting his motion to strike the date of the hearing because he could not be present.
Our review of the record and the briefs of the parties persuade us this is an appropriate case for affirmance under Rule 10(a) of this Court.

For the foregoing reason the judgment of the Trial Court is affirmed and the cause remanded for collection of costs below. Costs of appeal are adjudged against Mr. Slate.

_______________________________ Houston M. Goddard, P.J.3

CONCUR:

________________________________ Herschel P. Franks, J.

________________________________ Don T. McMurray, J.
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 18 (Thursday, January 28, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 4942]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-01707]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission Equity Market Structure Advisory Committee will 
hold a public meeting on Tuesday, February 2, 2016, in the Multipurpose 
Room, LL-006 at the Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC.
    The meeting will begin at 9:30 a.m. (EST) and will be open to the 
public. Seating will be on a first-come, first-served basis. Doors will 
be open at 9 a.m. Visitors will be subject to security checks. The 
meeting will be webcast on the Commission's Web site at www.sec.gov.
    On January 13, 2016, the Commission published notice of the 
Committee meeting (Release No. 34-76883), indicating that the meeting 
is open to the public and inviting the public to submit written 
comments to the Committee. This Sunshine Act notice is being issued 
because a majority of the Commission may attend the meeting.
    The agenda for the meeting will focus on the events of August 24, 
2015 and certain issues affecting customers in the current equity 
market structure.
    For further information, please contact the Office of the Secretary 
at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: January 26, 2016.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-01707 Filed 1-26-16; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
4852-3746-6781.3

EXHIBIT B

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3679-2 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:40:17 Page 1

of 2
4852-3746-6781.3 Exhibit B

COMPENSATION BY WORK TASK CODE FOR SERVICES RENDERED BY 

COBLENTZ PATCH DUFFY & BASS LLP FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 29, 2019

THROUGH FEBRUARY 28, 2019

TASK*

CODE DESCRIPTION* HOURS AMOUNT

C100 Fact Gathering 2.40 724.80

L110 Fact Investigation/Development 0.40 160.00

L120 Analysis/Strategy 3.30 1,650.00

L200 Pre-Trial Pleadings and Motions 7.30 3,460.00

L310 Written Discovery 2.40 1,090.00

L670 Production 16.50 2,913.00

P100 Project Administration 5.20 3,369.60

P240 Real and Personal Property 17.10 5,714.90

P300 Structure/Strategy/Analysis 58.10 37,233.00

P400 Initial Document Preparation/Filing 29.70 19,245.60

P500 Negotiation/Revision/Responses 8.00 5,184.00

P700 Post-Completion/Post-Closing 0.10 64.80

Total: $80,809.70

 

* These Task Codes and Descriptions were used by Coblentz in conjunction with pre-petition 

time entries and invoices as required by Debtors prior to the filing of these Bankruptcy Cases, 

and Coblentz continues to use them in conjunction with post-petition time entries and invoices in 

these Special Counsel matters. In connection with additional services Coblentz now is required 

to perform in connection with these bankruptcy cases (e.g., in connection with Coblentz's 

retention application, monthly fee statements, fee applications, or the like), Coblentz will identify 

any such additional services under additional Task Codes and/or Descriptions in subsequent 

Monthly Fee Statements and Fee Applications, when applicable.

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3679-2 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:40:17 Page 2

of 2