alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35
                                  ----------


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWALT, INC.
                        ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2007-1T1
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-1T1


         The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an
officer of Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans
Servicing LP (the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant
to Section 3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned
Series (the "Agreement") that:

(i)   A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

(ii)  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                      Dated: March 14, 2008
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
Exhibit 23.5

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board of Directors

HSBC Electronic Data Processing (Philippines) Inc.:

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-131714-04) on Form S-3 of HSBC Automotive Trust (USA) 2007 – 1 of our attestation report dated March 3, 2008 with respect to HSBC Electronic Data Processing (Philippines) Inc.’s (the Company) assessment of compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)(4)(viii) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for its servicing of asset backed securitization transactions backed by auto loan receivables, as of and for the period from January 31, 2007 (date of issuance of the initial asset-backed securitization transaction covered by this report) through December 31, 2007.  Management has determined that all other criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the Company’s activities with respect to HSBC Automotive Trust (USA) 2007 – 1.  Our attestation reportappears in the December 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K of HSBC Automotive Trust (USA) 2007 – 1.  

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

 

Chicago, Illinois

March 24, 2008
Motion Granted; Vacated and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed 

June 11, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-15-00150-CV

THE HARRIS COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT, Appellant

V.

CLEAR LAKE OFFICE PARTNERS, LLC AND METRO CLEAR LAKE 

OFFICE PARTNERS, LLC, Appellees

On Appeal from the 127th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2013-53295

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment signed January 22, 2015. On May 21, 

2015, the parties filed an agreed motion to reinstate the appeal and remand this 

case to the trial court for entry of an agreed final judgment. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.1(a)(2)(B). The motion is granted.
2

Accordingly, we order the trial court’s judgment vacated and set aside 

without regard to the merits and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of 

judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jamison and Busby.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - 14 CFR Part 71
          - [Docket No. FAA-2009-0604; Airspace Docket No. 09-ASO-18]

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

# SUMMARY:

                        This action confirms the effective date of a direct final rule published in the                         **Federal Register**                         September 14, 2009 that establishes Class E Airspace at Tompkinsville—Monroe County Airport, Tompkinsville, KY.                    

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         0901 UTC, January 27, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Melinda Giddens, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O. Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404) 305-5610.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Confirmation of Effective Date

                    The FAA published this direct final rule with a request for comments in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 14, 2009 (74 FR 46890), Docket No. FAA-2009-0604; Airspace Docket No. 09-ASO-18. The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would become effective on December 17, 2009. No adverse comments were received, and thus this notice confirms that effective date.                

Issued in College Park, Georgia, on January 14, 2010.

Myron A. Jenkins,

Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic Organization.

[FR Doc. 2010-1373 Filed 1-26-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
---

CONSENT OF STEPHEN P. ANTONY

The undersigned hereby consents to: (i) the filing of the
written disclosure of scientific and technical information regarding the
properties of Energy Fuels Inc. (the Company) in (a) the Companys Management
Discussion and Analysis for the period ended December 31, 2013 (the MD&A)
filed with the Form 40-F Annual Report of the Company for the period ended
December 31, 2013, and any amendments thereto (the Form 40-F), filed with the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and (b) the Management
Information Circular of the Company dated July 15, 2013, and the documents
incorporated by reference therein (the Circular); and (ii) the incorporation
by reference of such disclosure into (a) the Companys Form S-8 Registration
Statement, being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
and any amendments thereto (the S-8), and (b) the Companys Form F-10
Registration Statement, being filed with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission and any amendments thereto (the F-10).

I also consent to: (i) the use of my name in the MD&A, the
Circular, the F-10 and the Form 40-F; (ii) the incorporation by reference of the
Form 40-F, and the MD&A into the S-8; and (iii) the incorporation by
reference of the Form 40-F, the MD&A and the Circular into the F-10.

|                     | /s/ Stephen P. Antony               
|-------------------- | ------------------------------------
|                     | Name: Stephen P. Antony, P.E.       
|                     | Title: President and Chief Executive
|                     | Officer, Energy Fuels Inc.          
|                     |                                     
|                     |                                     
|Date: March 28, 2014 |                                     

---
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 26, 2010

p0222 

# Order

February 26, 2010

140043

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140043 COA: 293858 Oakland CC: 2007-214806-FH BRIAN EDWARD BROOKS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 8, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented shou ld be reviewed by this Court.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 238 (Tuesday, December 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63708-63709]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30186]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-71-000]


Trailblazer Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

December 6, 1995.
    Take notice that on December 1, 1995, Trailblazer Pipeline Company 
(Trailblazer) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third 
Revised Volume No. 1, revised tariff sheets to be effective January 1, 
1996.
    Trailblazer states that the purpose of the filing is to convert 
Trailblazer's tariff and rates from a volumetric (Mcf) to a thermal 
basis (MMBtu). The Commission's Order No. 582 issued September 28, 1995 
at Docket No. RM95-3-000 requires pipelines that are on a volumetric 
basis to convert to a thermal basis within one year of implementation. 
Trailblazer states that it is therefore converting its existing 
volumetric rates to a thermal basis. Trailblazer states that it has 
used the system average Btu for the twelve months ended September 30, 
1995 as the basis for converting to a thermal basis. Trailblazer states 
that there will be no increase in revenues under the proposed revisions 
since both volumes and rates are being converted.
    Trailblazer requested waiver of the Commission's Regulations to the 
extent necessary to permit the tariff sheets to become effective 
January 1, 1996.
    Trailblazer states that copies of the filing are being mailed to 
Trailblazer's jurisdictional customers and interested state regulatory 
agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with 18 CFR 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. Pursuant to Sec. 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations, all such motions or protests must be filed not later than 
12 days after the date of the filing noted above. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make 

[[Page 63709]]
protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a 
party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on 
file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the 
Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-30186 Filed 12-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-13-0003480

27-MAR-2014

10:55 AM
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOTICE PARTIES

PG&E Corporation

c/o Pacific Gas & Electric Company

Attn: Janet Loduca, Esq.

77 Beale Street

P.O. Box 770000

San Francisco, CA 94105

Keller & Benvenutti LLP

Attn: Tobias S. Keller, Esq.

Jane Kim, Esq.

650 California Street, Suite 1900

San Francisco, CA 94108

The Office of the United States Trustee for Region 17

Attn: James L. Snyder, Esq.

Timothy Laffredi, Esq.

450 Golden Gate Avenue, 5th Floor, Suite #05-0153

San Francisco, CA 94102

Milbank LLP

Attn: Dennis F. Dunne, Esq.

Sam A. Khalil, Esq.

55 Hudson Yards

New York, NY 10001-2163

Milbank LLP

Attn: Paul S. Aronzon, Esq.

Gregory A. Bray, Esq.

Thomas R. Kreller, Esq.

2029 Century Park East, 33rd Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90067

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP

Attn: Stephen Karotkin, Esq.

 Jessica Liou, Esq.

 Matthew Goren, Esq.

767 Fifth Avenue

New York, NY 10153-0119 

Bruce A. Markell

Fee Examiner

541 N. Fairbanks Court

Suite 2200

Chicago, IL 60611-3710

Scott H. McNutt

Attorney for the Fee Examiner

324 Warren Road

San Mateo, CA 94402

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5309-6 Filed: 01/08/20 Entered: 01/08/20 13:50:56 Page 1

of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5597 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5597

 To prohibit the Federal Government from issuing or enforcing certain 
               requirements for schools relating to food.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 18, 2014

Mr. Gohmert (for himself, Mr. Harris, Mrs. Bachmann, Mr. Westmoreland, 
     Mr. Marchant, Mr. Stockman, Mr. Rogers of Alabama, Mr. Roe of 
Tennessee, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Bridenstine, Mr. Yoho, Mr. Lankford, Mr. 
   Brooks of Alabama, Mr. Duncan of South Carolina, and Mr. McHenry) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                      Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the Federal Government from issuing or enforcing certain 
               requirements for schools relating to food.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as--
            (1) the ``Eliminate Dogmatic Interference by Bureaucratic 
        Lunch Extremists Act''; or
            (2) the ``EDIBLE Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS FOR SCHOOLS RELATING TO 
              FOOD.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Federal Government 
shall not issue or enforce any requirements for elementary schools or 
secondary schools (as such terms are defined in section 9101 of the 
Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801)) with 
respect to food for which there is or will be a cost not covered by the 
Federal Government.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

No. 84840 

FILE 

JUN 2 4 2022 

CORRY THOMAS BARNETT, A/K/A 

COREY THOMAS BARNETT, 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF 

CLARK, 

Respondent, 

and 

THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

Real Party in Interest. 

ORDER DENYING PETITION 

This pro se original petition for a writ of mandamus seeks to 

compel the district court to order the production of certain records. Having 

considered the petition, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and 

discretionary intervention is warranted. See NRS 34.170; Pan v. Eighth 

Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 88 P.3d 840, 841 (2004) (writ relief 

is proper only when there is no plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law 

and the petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that writ relief is 

warranted). Accordingly, we 

ORDER the petition DENIED. 

, J. 

Stiglich 

Parraguirre 

Hardesty 
cc: Corry Thomas Barnett 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(01 I7A .015,0D 2
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Patricia Szoka, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Sagent Technology, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September
30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations
of Sagent Technology, Inc. and its subsidiaries.



|November 14, 2003 |  | By: |  | /s/ Patricia Szoka                     
|----------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------
|                  |  |     |  | Patricia Szoka Chief Accounting Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0569

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

BRYCE COX,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 8, 2020, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 31 2020

07/31/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0569
#### Robert Stevenson vs. Brandeis University & another.1

January 11, 1996.

*Supreme Judicial Court,*

Appeal from order of single justice. *Practice, Civil,*Interlocutory appeal.

The case was submitted on the papers filed, accompanied by a memorandum of law.

1

Judith Herzfeld.

Supreme Judicial Court Rule 2:21 (2), *post*1303 (1995), concerning an appeal from a single justice’s denial of relief from an interlocutory ruling in the trial court, requires an appellant’s memorandum to “set forth the reasons why review of the trial court decision cannot adequately be obtained on appeal from any final adverse judgment in the trial court or by other available means.” The appellant has failed to set forth reasons why relief after a successful appeal from any adverse final judgment in this case will not be adequate. Moreover, the appeal, insofar as it relies on G. L. c. 231, § 118 (1994 ed.), is subject to the same jurisdictional defect as existed in *Ashford*v. *Massachusetts Bay Transp. Auth., ante*563 (1995).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*1010*Sanford A. Kowal*for the plaintiff.

*Lisa J. Damon & Lisa Stephanian Burton*for the defendants.
#### MILDRED BATTEN HINES et al. v. PEARL ROSE PEEDIN et al.

(Filed 18 October, 1939.)

Appeal by plaintiffs from *Hamilton, Special Judge,*at April Term, 1939, of Johnston.

Petition for partition among remaindermen after death of life tenant.

From an order of sale for partition and directing the commissioners to pay to the heirs of J. Eansom Eose, who was one of the remaindermen, the taxes advanced by him during occupancy of the premises by the life tenant, the plaintiffs appeal, assigning error.

*Otis L. Duncan for plaintiffs, appellants.*

*W. P. Aycock for defendants, appellees.*

Per Curiam.

Affirmed on authority of what was said in *Smith v. Miller,*158 N. C., 98, 73 S. E., 118.

Affirmed.
# United States Navy

**- Marine Corps**  **Court of Criminal Appeals**

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES Appellee

v. Patrick C. DELANNEY Hospital Corpsman Petty Officer Third Class (E

- 4), U.S. Navy Appellant
No. 201800318 Appeal from the United States Nav y - Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

. Decided: 17 April 2019

. Military Judge: Commander Shane E. Johnson, JAGC, USN

. Sentence a djudged 12 July 2018 by a general court

- martial convene d at Joint Base Pearl Harbor

- Hickam, Hawaii , consisting of a military judge sitting alo ne
. Sentence approved by convening authority : r eduction to E

- 1, confinement for 12 years, and a dishonorable discharge

. For Appellant: Captain Bree A. Ermentrout , JAGC, USN

. For Appellee: Brian K. Keller , Esq.

_________________________ This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2 (a)

.

_________________________ Before FULTON, HITESMAN , and GERDING , Appellate Military Judges.United States v. Delanney , No. 201 800318

2 PER CURIAM : After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the a ppellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 59 and 6 6, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866. T he findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority are AFFIRMED

.
FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4974 Filed: 12/04/19 Entered: 12/04/19 11:37:49 Page 1 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4974 Filed: 12/04/19 Entered: 12/04/19 11:37:49 Page 2 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4974 Filed: 12/04/19 Entered: 12/04/19 11:37:49 Page 3 of

3
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5752 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5752

 To require the Secretary of State to offer rewards for information on 
the kidnapping and murder of James Foley, Peter Kassig, Steven Sotloff, 
or the kidnapping and murder of any other citizen of the United States 
                  by a foreign terrorist organization.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 20, 2014

 Mr. Gosar (for himself, Mr. Franks of Arizona, Mr. Lamborn, Mr. Cook, 
Mr. Stockman, Mr. Sherman, Mr. Salmon, Mr. Schweikert, Mr. Bridenstine, 
Mr. Stewart, Mr. DeSantis, Mr. Yoho, Mr. Duncan of South Carolina, Mr. 
   Mulvaney, and Mr. Hurt) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Secretary of State to offer rewards for information on 
the kidnapping and murder of James Foley, Peter Kassig, Steven Sotloff, 
or the kidnapping and murder of any other citizen of the United States 
                  by a foreign terrorist organization.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REWARDS AUTHORIZED.

    (a) In General.--In accordance with the Rewards for Justice program 
authorized under section 36(b) of the State Department Basic 
Authorities Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 2708(b)), the Secretary of State 
shall offer a reward to any individual who furnishes information 
leading to the arrest or conviction in any country of any individual 
for committing, conspiring or attempting to commit, or aiding or 
abetting in the commission of the kidnapping and murder of James Foley, 
Peter Kassig, Steven Sotloff, or the kidnapping and murder of any other 
citizen of the United States by a foreign terrorist organization.
    (b) Limitation.--The total amount of rewards offered under 
subsection (a) in connection with the kidnapping and murder of any one 
of the individuals named in such subsection or any other citizen of the 
United States described in such subsection may not exceed $5,000,000.
    (c) Foreign Terrorist Organization.--The term ``foreign terrorist 
organization'' means an organization designated by the Secretary of 
State as a foreign terrorist organization in accordance with section 
219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189).
                                 <all>
```