alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CEO CERTIFICATION**

 

I, David M. Thomas, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of IMS Health Incorporated (the “registrant”);

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)          Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)         Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)          Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

 

(a)          Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b)         Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:  August 3, 2004

 
| By:    | /s/ David M. Thomas                  |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|   | David M. Thomas                      |   |
|   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
##### 



EXHIBIT 35.1
 VW Credit, Inc. Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria
And Item 1123 of Regulation AB
 
   1.
    
    A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from February 13, 2007
through December 31, 2007, and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement
was conducted under my supervision.2.
    
    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has, fulfilled all of
its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout
such period, except that with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criterion in paragraph
(d)(3)(i) of item 1122. On March 28, 2007, an error was discovered in the Monthly
Servicers Certificate filed on March 20, 2007. The Monthly Servicers Certificate
incorrectly reported a net swap receipt as a net swap payment. Payments of principal and
interest to investors were not affected and were correctly stated in the Monthly Servicers
Certificate. On March 29, 2007, a restated version of the Monthly Servicers Certificate
was delivered to the Indenture Trustee. The error was corrected upon recognition and,
individually and in the aggregate did not have a material adverse impact on the Noteholders
and did not create a Servicer Default under the Agreement. In addition, on February 27,
2008 a process control deficiency was identified (and corrected February 27, 2008) in the
calculation of the daily amount required to transfer to the collection account, however,
sufficient funds were being transferred and there was no impact to the Noteholders.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate on behalf of the
Servicer this twenty-eighth day of March, 2008.
 /s/ Frank WitterFrank WitterPresident & CFO
#### Levi P. Rose, Respondent, v. David Hawley and others, Appellants.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.;

Dykman, J., not sitting.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5602 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

21350 Avalon Boulevard in Carson, California, as the ‘‘Juanita 

Millender-McDonald Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 

Ms. HAHN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 21350 Avalon Boulevard in Carson, California, 

as the ‘‘Juanita Millender-McDonald Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JUANITA MILLENDER-MCDONALD POST OF4 FICE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 21350 Avalon Boulevard in Car7 son, California, shall be known and designated as the 

8 ‘‘Juanita Millender-McDonald Post Office’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5602 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in section 1 shall be 

4 deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Juanita Millender5 McDonald Post Office’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Harry Hunt, Respondent, v Millennium Builders, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. Gold Coast Builders, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

[774 NYS2d 768]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Franco, J.), entered January 30, 2003, which, upon the granting of the plaintiffs motion pursuant to CPLR 4401 for judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability and upon a jury verdict on the issue of damages, is in favor of the plaintiff and against it in the principal sum of $250,000.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

On July 9, 1997, the plaintiff, a window installer employed by his brother’s company, James Hunt Construction, was assigned to install windows at a house being renovated in Muttontown. The defendant, Millennium Builders, Inc., was the general contractor on the renovation job, James Hunt Construction was the subcontractor, and the third-party defendant, Gold Coast Builders, Inc. (hereinafter Gold Coast), was the coordinator of the subcontractors. The plaintiff commenced this action seeking to recover damages for the injuries he sustained when he fell off an extension ladder that spontaneously retracted while he was working. The defendant commenced a third-party action seeking indemnification from Gold Coast.

The Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiff’s motion for judgment as matter of law since there was no rational process by which the jury could have found for the defendant and *634against the plaintiff *(see*CPLR 4401; *Smith v Hercules Constr. Corp.,*274 AD2d 467 [2000]). The plaintiff established that the defendant violated Labor Law § 240 (1) and that such violation was a proximate cause of his injuries *(see Guzman v Gumley-Haft,*274 AD2d 555 [2000]; *Madden v Trustees of Duryea Presbyt. Church,*210 AD2d 382 [1994]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is not properly before this Court. S. Miller, J.P., Luciano, Adams and Cozier, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 107 (Friday, June 4, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 31819]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13410]



[[Page 31819]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Notice of Permits Issued Under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 
1978

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation of 
1978, Public Law 95-541.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish 
notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. 
This is the required notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nadene G. Kennedy, Permit Office, 
Office of Polar Programs, Rm. 755, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 28, 2010, the National Science 
Foundation published a notice in the Federal Register of a permit 
application received. A permit was issued on May 28, 2010 to: David 
Ainley; Permit No. 2011-002.

Nadene G. Kennedy,
Permit Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-13410 Filed 6-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

M. Ryan Pinkston (SBN 310971) 

rpinkston@seyfarth.com 

560 Mission Street, Suite 3100 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 397-2823 

Facsimile: (415) 397-8549 

Attorneys for 

Turner Construction Company

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION, 

- and - 

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, 

Debtors. 

☐ Affects PG&E Corporation 

☒ Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company

☐ Affects both Debtors 

*All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case, 

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Bankruptcy Case

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Chapter 11 

(Lead Case) 

(Jointly Administered) 

TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY’S 

NOTICE OF PERFECTION OF LIEN 

PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. § 546(b)

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4915 Filed: 12/01/19 Entered: 12/01/19 12:51:28 Page 1 of

5
1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 362(b)(3) and 546(b), Turner Construction Company (“Turner”) hereby 

gives notice of its perfection of, maintenance and continuation of perfection of, and intention to enforce 

to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, see, e.g., California Civil Code § 8400 et seq., Turner’s 

duly recorded mechanic’s lien for labor, equipment, material, and services provided by Turner to Pacific 

Gas and Electric Company, as more fully described in the attached Exhibit A. See Village Nurseries v. 

Gould (In re Baldwin Builders), 232 B.R. 406 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 1999); Village Nurseries v. Greenbaum, 

101 Cal. App. 4th 26 (2002). This notice is in addition to, and not in lieu of, Turner’s right and intention 

to enforce its lien to the fullest extent permitted by law. Turner reserves all rights. 

DATED: December 1, 2019 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

By: /s/ M. Ryan Pinkston 

M. Ryan Pinkston 

Attorneys for Turner Construction Company

56430669v.1 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4915 Filed: 12/01/19 Entered: 12/01/19 12:51:28 Page 2 of

5
EXHIBIT A 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4915 Filed: 12/01/19 Entered: 12/01/19 12:51:28 Page 3 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4915 Filed: 12/01/19 Entered: 12/01/19 12:51:28 Page 4 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4915 Filed: 12/01/19 Entered: 12/01/19 12:51:28 Page 5 of

5
#### Champion Oil Company, Inc., Claimant, *v.*The State *of*New York, Defendant.

(Claim No. 24197.)

Court of Claims,

October 10, 1936.

*144*Joseph E. Rizzo [L. Earl Higbee*of counsel], for the claimant.

*John J. Bennett, Attorney-General [Joseph I. Butler, Assistant Attorney-General,*of counsel], for the defendant.

*John H. Wdlrath,*for the Syracuse Grade Crossing Commission.

*Hiscock, Cowie, Bruce & Lee [Maurice F. Lane*of counsel], for the New York Central Railroad Company.

Ryan, J.

This claim is the first case to be submitted to this court under chapter 825 of the Laws of 1928, known as the Syracuse Grade Crossing Elimination Act. Claimant’s property abuts on Riegel street and lies between Beach and Vine streets in the city of Syracuse. Riegel street was closed by the Syracuse commission. A nineteen-foot embankment was constructed therein and .upon this the railroad tracks were placed. This completely cut off access to claimant’s lands although no part thereof was taken.

Claimant sues pursuant to section 9 of the act, which reads: *“*If the work of such elimination causes damage to property not acquired as above provided, the State shall be liable therefor in the first instance, but this provision shall not be deemed to create any liability not already existing in law.”

We are convinced that under the authorities known as the *Elevated Railroad*cases, there was 'liability already Existing in law when the statute in question was enacted. *(Story*v. *New York Elevated Railroad,*90 N. Y. 122; *Egerer*v. *New York Central, etc., R. R. Co.,*130 id. 108, and other cases.) If such liability existed it is reserved to claimant herein. *(Askey & Hager*v. *State of New York,*240 App. Div. 451; affd., 266 N. Y. 587; *Dwornik*v. *State of New York,*155 Misc. 458.)

The order closing the street was adopted by the Syracuse commission September 25, 1933, and approved by the Public Service Commission October 10, 1933. The physical closing of Riegel street at Beech street was accomplished in the summer of. 1934 and of Riegel street at Vine street in September,-1934. • Claimant *145presented a claim to the Syracuse commission which was rejected by it May 14, 1935. Its claim was .filed in this court November 27, 1935.

The Public Service Commission has not yet finally approved the elimination work and we are asked to dismiss the claim on the ground that it is prematurely filed. Section 9 recites that this court has jurisdiction, “ provided, however, that such claim is filed with the Court of Claims within six months after final approval of the elimination work by the Public Service Commission.”

We hold that the damages were caused when the physical change was made. *(People ex rel. Janes*v. *Dickey,*206 N. Y. 581.) That the Commission may in the future direct the alteration of the physical structures so as to restore to claimant the access to its property of which it has been deprived, although possible, is unlikely. Claimant’s cause of action has already accrued. Its damages should be determined as of September, 1934. Claimant is entitled to an award.

Ackerson, J., concurs.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 15, 2024.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, May 15, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A24I0193. KHIRY HAKIM CLEMONS v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2023SUCR537
SCAD-19-0000561

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner,

vs.

GARY VICTOR DUBIN,

Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(ODC Case Nos. 16-O-147, 16-O-151, 16-O-213, and 16-O-326)

ORDER

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the August 18, 2019 motion for

reconsideration filed by Respondent Gary V. Dubin, with regards

to this court’s August 15, 2019 order, denying his motion to seal

the record in this matter, and the record, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, August 26, 2019.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCAD-19-0000561

26-AUG-2019

01:39 PM
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5740 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5740

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the maximum age for 
     children eligible for medical care under the CHAMPVA program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 19, 2014

 Mr. Fortenberry introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the maximum age for 
     children eligible for medical care under the CHAMPVA program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Dependents' Parity Act''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE OF MAXIMUM AGE FOR CHILDREN ELIGIBLE FOR MEDICAL CARE 
              UNDER CHAMPVA PROGRAM.

    (a) Increase.--Subsection (c) of section 1781 of title 38, United 
States Code, is amended to read as follows:
    ``(c)(1) Notwithstanding clauses (i) and (iii) of section 101(4)(A) 
of this title, for purposes of this section, a child who is eligible 
for benefits under subsection (a) shall be eligible for benefits under 
this section until the child's 26th birthday, regardless of the marital 
status of the child or whether the child is pursuing a full-time course 
of instruction at an educational institution.
    ``(2) This subsection shall not be construed to limit eligibility 
for coverage of a child described in section 101(4)(A)(ii) of this 
title.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--Such subsection, as so amended, shall apply 
with respect to medical care provided on or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE v. NATHAN BLAKE.

(Filed 2 April, 1930.)

Criminal Law G 1 — Defendant is entitled to testify upon voir dire as to voluntariness of confession.

Where evidence is taken upon the *voir <Hre*as to the competency or voluntariness of the confession of the prisoner charged with murder, the prisoner, at his own request, is entitled to be heard as to the voluntariness *548of tlie confession, and a denial of the right will be held for reversible error as denying to the prisoner the benefit of his own testimony and as impelling him to take the stand upon the trial to deny its voluntariness.

Appeal by defendant from *Granmer, J.,*at December Term, 1929, of Dubham.

Criminal prosecution tried upon an indictment charging tbe prisoner with tbe murder of one Will Hall.

From an adverse verdict and judgment of death by electrocution pronounced thereon, the prisoner appeals, assigning errors.

*Attorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.*

*Philip A. Escoffery for defendant.*

Staoy, C. J.

The record is in a very unsatisfactory condition, but one circumstance seems to appear with certainty, and that is, in hearing evidence on the *voir dire*to determine the competency or voluntariness of an alleged confession, made by the prisoner while in jail, the court declined to permit the prisoner to testify, and ruled upon the State’s evidence alone that said confession was voluntary, and admitted the same in evidence. In this there was error. *S. v. Fox,*197 N. C., 478, 149 S. E., 735. The prisoner, at his own request, was entitled to be heard on the preliminary inquiry looking -to the admissibility of the alleged confession in evidence. *S.*v. *Whitener,*191 N. C., 659, 132 S. E., 603.

The ruling was hurtful in two ways: 1. It denied to the prisoner the benefit of his own testimony while the admissibility of the alleged confession was in issue; and (2) thereafter he felt impelled to take the stand as a witness in his own behalf and deny its voluntariness, but for the admission of which a different course might have been pursued on the trial.

For the error, as indicated, in declining to hear the prisoner on the preliminary inquiry as to the voluntariness of the alleged confession, a new trial must be awarded, and it is so ordered.

New trial.
ex-10.1

 Standard Gold Corp.
 Rocky Mountain Minerals Corp.
 897 Quail Run Drive. Grand Junction CO 81505
 

 June 21, 2016
 

 Mr. Arden Larson
 2512 Hayes Drive
 Grand Junction, CO 81505
 

 	 	
	 Re:
	 June 11, 2012 Option Agreement as amended

	  
	 May 6, 2015


 

 Dear Arden:
 

 With respect to our phone discussion on June 14, 2016, this letter confirms termination of the subject Option Agreement ("Agreement") effective June 14,2016. Bullfrog Gold Corp. agrees to issue you as soon as practical 270,000 shares of common shares of BFGC that are restricted pursuant to SEC rule 144. Such shares are issued as full and final payment of any and all past and future obligations under the Agreement as amended.
 

 Although all data has been transferred to you during the term of the Agreement, let us know if there is anything else that you may be aware that we may have concerning the Project and the Agreement.
 

 Last August we agreed to file claim maintenance on 72 unpatented claims, of which 52 were claims staked by Standard Gold in its own name and 20 were part of the original 64 claims in the June 11,2012 Agreement. Attached is a Quitclaim Deed for the 52 claims.
 

 With best wishes to your future endeavors,
 

 Standard Gold Corp.
 Rocky Mountain Minerals Corp.
 

 

 /s/ David Beling
 David Beling
 President
 

 

 	 	
	 Agreed and accepted by:
	 /s/ Arden Larson

	  
	 Arden Larson, Optionor