alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 553 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 50
113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 553

                          [Report No. 113-204]

 To designate the exclusive economic zone of the United States as the 
 ``Ronald Wilson Reagan Exclusive Economic Zone of the United States''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2013

   Mr. Issa introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

                           September 10, 2013

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the exclusive economic zone of the United States as the 
 ``Ronald Wilson Reagan Exclusive Economic Zone of the United States''.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF THE RONALD WILSON REAGAN EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC 
              ZONE OF THE UNITED STATES.

    (a) Designation.--The exclusive economic zone of the United States, 
as established by Presidential Proclamation Numbered 5030, dated March 
10, 1983, is designated as the ``Ronald Wilson Reagan Exclusive 
Economic Zone of the United States''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the exclusive economic 
zone of the United States is deemed to be a reference to the ``Ronald 
Wilson Reagan Exclusive Economic Zone of the United States''.
                                                  House Calendar No. 50

113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 553

                          [Report No. 113-204]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To designate the exclusive economic zone of the United States as the 
 ``Ronald Wilson Reagan Exclusive Economic Zone of the United States''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 10, 2013

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
| Name                      | Vessel/Activity                      | Organization     | Ownership percentage |
|---------------------------|--------------------------------------|------------------|----------------------|
| Star Bulk Management Inc. | Management Co.                       | Marshall Islands | 100%                 |
| Star Bulk S.A.            | Management Co.                       | Marshall Islands | 100%                 |
| Star Alpha LLC            | Star Alpha                           | Marshall Islands | 100%                 |
| Star Beta LLC             | Star Beta                            | Marshall Islands | 100%                 |
| Star Gamma LLC            | Star Gamma                           | Marshall Islands | 100%                 |
| Star Delta LLC            | Star Delta                           | Marshall Islands | 100%                 |
| Star Epsilon LLC          | Star Epsilon                         | Marshall Islands | 100%                 |
| Star Zeta LLC             | Star Zeta                            | Marshall Islands | 100%                 |
| Star Theta LLC            | Star Theta                           | Marshall Islands | 100%                 |
| Star Kappa LLC            | Star Kappa                           | Marshall Islands | 100%                 |
| Lamda LLC                 | Star Sigma                           | Marshall Islands | 100%                 |
| Star Omicron LLC          | Star Omicron                         | Marshall Islands | 100%                 |
| Star Cosmo LLC            | Star Cosmo                           | Marshall Islands | 100%                 |
| Star Ypsilon LLC          | Star Ypsilon                         | Marshall Islands | 100%                 |
| Star Iota                 | Vessel Sold                          | Marshall Islands | 100%                 |
| Star Aurora LLC           | Star Aurora                          | Marshall Islands | 100%                 |
| Star Borealis LLC         | Star Borealis (Hull)                 | Marshall Islands | 100%                 |
| Star Polaris LLC          | Star Polaris   (Hull) | Marshall Islands | 100%                 |
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

        In connection with the quarterly report of Northwest AirlinesCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Neal S. Cohen, Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

                        (1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

                        (2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: November 9, 2005        |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
|                          |   |
| /s/ Neal S. Cohen             |   |
| Neal S. Cohen                 |   |
| Executive Vice President  and |   |
| Chief Financial Officer       |   |
|                               |        |  |

 

        This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Qpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended(the “Exchange Act”).  Such certificationwill not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under theSecurities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extentthat the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 30, 2013

s0923

Order 

Clerk

September 30, 2013

147177

TOWNSHIP OF RICHMOND,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147177

COA: 307520

Macomb CC: 2011-002437-CZ

RONDIGO, L.L.C.,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 21, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

ZAHRA, J., did not participate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel at an 

earlier stage of the proceedings.
#### In the Matter of the Application of Joseph Haas for Payment of an Award, Made for Parcel No. 1 A in the Matter of Acquiring Title, etc., to Premises Situated at the Southeasterly Corner of Sumpter Street and Rockaway Avenue, etc.

Report of referee confirmed.

Present — Thomas, Carr, Woodward and Rich, JJ.; Jenks, P. J., taking no part;
Project Category and Professional Hours

For the Period August 1, 2019 through August 31, 2019

Exhibit B

Position

PG&E Corporation, et al. (Case No. 19-30088 (DM))

PwC LLP - Management, Tax and Advisory Consultants to the Debtors

Total 

Compensation

Fixed Fee Services - Summary of Hours and Fees by Project and Professional 

Claims Services Retention Exhibit #: 01-B

Nikhita Reddy Sanikommu Senior Associate 22.00

Subtotal - Claims Services 22.00 $3,417.00

Total - Hours and Compensation - Fixed Fee Services 22.00 $3,417.00

Monday, December 30, 2019

Page 1 of 1

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5229-2 Filed: 12/31/19 Entered: 12/31/19 09:45:02 Page 1

of 1
Exhibit 10.1






Exhibit 10.1




FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEASE




FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEASE dated June 11, 2009, by and between CEDAR BROOK 5 CORPORATE CENTER,
L.P., having an address at 1000 Eastpark Boulevard, Cranbury, New Jersey 08512 (hereinafter called
the “Landlord”); and AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. having an address at 5 Cedar Brook Drive, Cranbury,
New Jersey 08512 (hereinafter called the “Tenant”).



WITNESSETH:




WHEREAS, the parties entered into a Lease Agreement dated July 31, 2006 (“Lease”) for a
portion of the building known as 5 Cedar Brook Drive, Cranbury, New Jersey 08512; and



WHEREAS, the parties now desire to amend the Lease;



NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto covenant and agree as follows:




	 	1.	 	The termination date of the Lease shall be extended to February 29, 2012.






	 	2.	 	The parties mutually represent to each other that Jones Lang LaSalle
Brokerage, Inc. is the broker who negotiated and consummated the within transaction,
and that neither party dealt with any other broker in connection with the Lease. In
the event that either party violates this representation, it shall indemnify, defend
and hold the other party harmless from all claims and damages.






	 	3.	 	Landlord agrees to use its best efforts to obtain a non-disturbance
agreement within three (3) months time with its
new, or in the event refinancing does not take place, its existing lender.



 


 









 












	 	4.	 	Except as hereinabove referred to, all other terms and conditions of the
Lease shall remain in full force and effect, unimpaired and unmodified.






	 	5.	 	This agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto, their heirs,
successors, and assigns.






IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunder set
their hands and seals or caused these presents to be executed by their
proper corporate officers and caused their proper corporate seals to
be hereunder affixed the day and year first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	CEDAR BROOK 5 CORPORATE CENTER, L.P.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ A. Joseph Stern
 	 
	 	 	A. Joseph Stern, 	 
	 	 	President of Cedar Brook 5, Inc. its General Partner 	 
	 
	 	AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ John F. Crowley
 	 
	 	 	John F. Crowley, 	 
	 	 	President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Kenneth P. Silverman, Respondent, v Lilieth T. Heron, Appellant.

[773 NYS2d 570]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Peck, J.), entered August 22, 2003, which denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The plaintiffs predecessor-in-interest, Vito Guadino, allegedly slipped and fell on the steps leading to the front porch of the defendant’s house during a heavy rain. Guadino testified at his *759examination before trial that the steps were made of glossy tiles that were slippery from the rain.

The defendant established her prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, through her deposition testimony demonstrating that the subject steps were made of “nonslippery tiles,” had a grip to prevent slipping, and were designed so that water would run off *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320 [1986]; *Rodriguez v Kimco Centereach 605,*298 AD2d 571 [2002]; *Sadowsky v 2175 Wantagh Ave.,*281 AD2d 407 [2001]; *King v New York City Tr. Auth.,*266 AD2d 354 [1999]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Rodriguez v Kimco Centereach 605, supra; Radaelli v City of Troy,*229 AD2d 882 [1996]; *see also Larussa v Shell Oil Co.,*283 AD2d 403 [2001]; *Werner v Neary,*264 AD2d 731 [1999]), and whether the defendant had notice of this alleged dangerous condition *(see Rodriguez v Kimco Centereach 605; Wasserstrom v New York City Tr. Auth.,*267 AD2d 36 [1999]). Altman, J.P., S. Miller, Krausman and Cozier, JJ., concur.
#### STATE v. LEE FLYNN.

(Filed 27 March, 1940.)

1. Criminal Law § 80—

Where defendant, convicted of a capital felony, fails to file his case on appeal within the time allowed, the motion of the Attorney-General to docket and dismiss will be allowed when an examination of the record proper fails to disclose error. Buie of Practice in the Supreme Court, No. 17.

*2.*Criminal Law § 69—

Defendant’s petition for *certiorari*denied for want of merit.

Appeal by defendant from *Armstrong, J.,*at January Term, 1940, of McDowell. Judgment affirmed.

Appeal dismissed.

*Attorney-General McMullan for the State, appellee.*

*D. F. Giles for defendant, appellant.*

Per Curiam.

Lee Flynn was tried at January Term, 1940, of McDowell Superior Court, on an indictment charging him with the murder •of one Mae Flynn, was convicted of murder in the first degree, and judgment thereupon was entered that he suffer death by asphyxiation, as provided by law. From this judgment the defendant gave notice of appeal to the Supreme Court and was allowed the statutory time to make up and serve his ease on appeal; but, as appears from the record, the appeal was not perfected.

The Attorney-General, as his duty requires, filed a motion in this Court to docket and dismiss the appeal under Rule 17 for the stated cause, and filed therewith a transcript of the ease and certificate of the clerk of the Superior Court of McDowell County, setting forth the fact that no case on appeal has been filed in his office, and that the time allowed by the Court for perfecting the appeal has expired, and the same has not been perfected. *S. v. Stovall,*214 N. C., 695, 200 S. E., 426; *S. v. Watson,*208 N. C., 70, 179 S. E., 455. The defendant’s petition for *certiorari*is denied for want of merit. The motion to dismiss the appeal must be allowed; but, as it is required to do by law in capital cases, this Court has diligently examined the record before it and, upon said record, finds no error.

The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. *S. v. Day,*215 N. C., 566, 2 S. E. (2d), 569; *S. v. Young,*216 N. C., 626.

Judgment affirmed. Appeal dismissed.
Summary of Guaranty Contract
of Maximum Amount ( the “Contract”) Entered into by and between BAK
International (Tianjin) Limited (the “Guarantor”) and Shenzhen Caitian Branch,
Bank of Communications (the “Creditor”) on April 26, 2009

    


    Main
contents:

    Ø     Guaranty
Contract number: 4431702009B100000000;

    Ø     Bak
International (Tianjin) Limited undertakes to assume joint and several
liabilities for Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd (the “Obligor”)’s indebtedness
towards Bank of Communications under the Comprehensive Credit Facility
Agreement of Maximum Amount (reference no.: 4431702009C000000000) from
March 25, 2009 to March 25, 2010, and the maximum amount secured
is RMB 200 million.

    Ø     Guaranty Responsibility: The guaranty
under this Contract shall be guaranty with joint and several liabilities. The
guarantor is obligated to pay off the debt in the event the obligor is unable to
pay off the debt (including the creditor declares the debt becomes mature in
advance to its original expiry date due to default of the obligor or the
guarantor).

    Ø     Scope of Guaranty: The guaranty shall cover
all of the loan principal, interest, penalty interest, breach of contract
compensation, damages, undertaking fee and all the expenses such as litigation
cost, lawyer’s fee, notification cost and public notice cost etc. which is
incurred to the Creditor in realizing its creditor’s right.

    Ø     Guaranty period: The
guaranty period is from the effective date of this Contract to two years after
the expiry of the term of the Credit Facility Agreement and relevant agreement
entered into under the Credit Facility Agreement.

    


    Headlines
of the articles omitted:

    Ø     Termination
and explanation

    Ø     Payment
on demand

    Ø     Declaration
and guaranty of the Guarantor

    Ø     Obligations
of the Guarantor

    Ø     Agreement
of Bank Sequestrate Deposits

    Ø     Disputation
settlement

    Ø     Supplement
articles
Exhibit 23.1





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





Greenlight Capital Re, Ltd.


Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-226022) and Form S-8 (No. 333-144284) of Greenlight Capital Re, Ltd. of our reports dated February 27, 2019 relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules, and the effectiveness of Greenlight Capital Re, Ltd.’s internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Form 10-K/A.





/s/ BDO USA, LLP


Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA


March 15, 2019
Signed and Filed: November 1, 2019

________________________________________

DENNIS MONTALI

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

Entered on Docket 

November 04, 2019

EDWARD J. EMMONS, CLERK 

U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4556 Filed: 11/01/19 Entered: 11/04/19 08:44:10 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4556 Filed: 11/01/19 Entered: 11/04/19 08:44:10 Page 2 of

2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE

Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP 

180 Maiden Lane 

New York, NY 10038-4982

STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP 

Mark A. Speiser (pro hac vice pending) 

(mspeiser@stroock.com) 

Kenneth Pasquale (pro hac vice pending) 

kpasquale@stroock.com) 

Sherry J. Millman (pro hac vice pending) 

(smillman@stroock.com) 

Harold A. Olsen (pro hac vice pending) 

(holsen@stroock.com) 

180 Maiden Lane 

New York, NY 10038-4982 

Tel: 212 806 5400 

Fax: 212 806 6006 

STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP 

David W. Moon (#197711) 

(dmoon@stroock.com) 

2029 Century Park East 

Los Angeles, CA 90067-3086 

Tel: 310 556-5800 

Fax: 310 556 5959 

Attorneys for Mizuho Bank, Ltd. 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION

– and – 

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY 

Debtors.

Bankruptcy Case 

No. 19 -30088 (DM) 

Chapter 11 

(Lead Case) 

(Jointly Administered) 

APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF 

ATTORNEY KENNETH PASQUALE  PRO HAC VICE Affects PG&E Corporation 

 Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company 

 Affects all Debtors 

Pursuant to B.L.R. 1001-2(a) and Civil L.R. 11-3, Kenneth Pasquale, an active member in 

good standing of the bar of the State of New York, hereby applies for admission to practice in the 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 477 Filed: 02/19/19 Entered: 02/19/19 12:50:41 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 

APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE

Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP 

180 Maiden Lane 

New York, NY 10038-4982

Northern District of California on a pro hac vice basis representing Mizuho Bank, Ltd., in the 

above-entitled actions. 

In support of this application, I certify on oath that: 

1. I am an active member in good standing of a United States Court or of the highest 

court of another State or the District of Columbia, as indicated above; 

2. I agree to abide by the Standards of Professional Conduct set forth in Local Rule 11-

4, and agree to become familiar with the Local Rules and the Bankruptcy Dispute Resolution 

Program of this Court; and, 

3. An attorney who is a member of the bar of this Court in good standing and who 

maintains an office within the State of California has been designated as co-counsel in the aboveentitled actions. The name, address and telephone number of that attorney is: 

David W. Moon (#197711) 

Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP 

2029 Century Park East 

Los Angeles, CA 90067-3086 

Tel: 310 556-5800 

dmoon@stroock.com 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Dated: February 19, 2019 

 /s/ Kenneth Pasquale 

 Kenneth Pasquale 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 477 Filed: 02/19/19 Entered: 02/19/19 12:50:41 Page 2 of 3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 477 Filed: 02/19/19 Entered: 02/19/19 12:50:41 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of MEMSIC, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Shang Hsiao, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 14, 2008



/S/ SHANG
HSIAOShang HsiaoChief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Steven M. Olson, Esq.

State Bar No. 146120

Jacob M. Faircloth, Esq.

State Bar No. 305390

LAW OFFICE OF STEVEN M. OLSON

50 Old Courthouse Square, Suite 401

Santa Rosa, CA 95404

Telephone: (707) 575-1800

Facsimile: (707) 575-1867

Email: smo@smolsonlaw.com

Attorney for Aztrack Construction Corporation

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In Re

PG&E CORPORATION,

 Debtor.

________________________________/

Case No. 19-30088-DM

(Chapter 11)

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS OF CREDITOR’S COUNSEL

Please take notice that the address of Law Office of Steven M. Olson, counsel for

creditor Aztrack Construction Corporation, has changed to the address set forth in the

caption above.

Dated: January 6, 2020 LAW OFFICE OF STEVEN M. OLSON

/S/ Steven M. Olson

BY: _____________________________

 Steven M. Olson

ATTORNEY FOR CREDITOR

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS OF CREDITOR’S COUNSEL - Page 1 Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5275 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 14:36:53 Page 1 of

1
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Don Marcos Trading Co. (the Company”) on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, we, Earl T. Shannon, President, and
Scott W. Bodenweber, Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.           The
report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:  April
14, 2009








/s/ Earl T.
Shannon


Earl T.
Shannon,


President





/s/ Scott W.
Bodenweber


Scott W.
Bodenweber,


Chief
Financial Officer