62824 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 235 / Thursday, December 7, 1995 / Notices

order (Slip Op. 94–144) remanding to

the Department the final results of the

second administrative review of

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

(Samsung). On March 15, 1995, the CIT

affirmed the Department’s

redetermination (Slip Op. 95–45). Since

the CIT’s ruling was not appealed, and

the CIT’s decision affirming our

redetermination has therefore become

final and conclusive, we are amending

our final results of the second

administrative review of the

antidumping duty order on CTVs from

Korea with respect to Samsung.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 7, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Joseph Hanley or Zev Primor, Office of

Antidumping Compliance, Import

Administration, International Trade

Administration, U.S. Department of

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution

Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230;

telephone: (202) 482–5253.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Scope of the Review

Imports covered by this review

include CTVs, complete and

incomplete, from the Republic of Korea.

This merchandise is currently classified

under item numbers 8528.10.80,

8529.90.15, 8529.90.20, and 8540.11.00

of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule

(HTS). Since the order covers all CTVs

regardless of HTS classification, the

HTS subheading is provided for

convenience and for the U.S. Customs

Service purposes. Our written

description of the scope of the order

remains dispositive. The period of

review is April 25, 1984 through March

31, 1985.

Amended Final Results of Review

The CIT ordered the Department to:

(1) Recalculate the value-added tax

(VAT) adjustment according to its new

methodology, (2) determine whether

certain sales qualify as purchase price or

exporter’s sale price (ESP) transactions,

and (3) adjust ESP for commissions and

indirect selling expenses. As to

Samsung’s claimed circumstance-of-sale

(COS) adjustments to foreign market

value (FMV), the Department was

directed to: (1) re-classify SYPM credit

rebates and volume rebates as direct

selling expenses, and (2) reconsider the

classification of replacement parts and

forwarding charges. The CIT also

instructed the Department to correct

clerical errors in its computer program.

As a result of our recalculations, we

have determined that the following

percentage weighted-average margin

exists for the period April 25, 1984

through March 31, 1985:

Manufacturer/exporter Percent

margin

Samsung ..................................... 1.18

Because the CIT’s decision affirming

our redetermination has become final

and conclusive, the Department will

order the immediate lifting of the

suspension of liquidation and instruct

the U.S. Customs Service to assess

antidumping duties on entries subject to

this review, as appropriate. Individual

differences between foreign market

value and U.S. price may vary from the

percentage stated above. The

Department will issue appraisement

instructions concerning these entries

directly to the U.S. Customs Service.

This notice serves as a reminder to

importers of their responsibility under

19 CFR 353.26 to file a certificate

regarding the reimbursement of

antidumping duties prior to liquidation

of the relevant entries during the review

period. Failure to comply with this

requirement could result in the

Secretary’s presumption that

reimbursement of antidumping duties

occurred and the subsequent assessment

of double antidumping duties.

This amendment of final results of

review and notice are in accordance

with section 751(f) of the Tariff Act (19

U.S.C. 1673(d)(1994)) and 19 CFR

353.28(c).

Dated: November 21, 1995.

Susan G. Esserman,

Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 95–29891 Filed 12–6–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

[A–580–008]

Color Television Receivers from the

Republic of Korea; Amended Final

Results of Antidumping Duty

Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of amended final results

of antidumping duty administrative

review.

SUMMARY: On June 27, 1990, the

Department of Commerce (the

Department) published the final results

of the fourth administrative review of

the antidumping duty order on color

television receivers (CTVs) from the

Republic of Korea (Korea) (55 FR

26225). The review covered the period

April 1, 1986, through March 31, 1987.

On September 21, 1994, the Court of

International Trade (CIT) remanded to

the Department for redetermination the

final results of the fourth administrative

review of Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

(Samsung) (Slip Op. 94–148). On

January 30, 1995, the Department

submitted to the CIT the final results of

redetermination. On March 15, 1995,

the CIT issued a second order (Slip Op.

95–46) remanding to the Department the

January 30, 1995, final results of

redetermination. On April 14, 1995, the

Department submitted a second final

results of redetermination to the CIT. On

May 31, 1995, the CIT affirmed the

Department’s second redetermination

(Slip Op. 95–100). Since the CIT’s ruling

was not appealed, and the CIT’s

decision affirming our redetermination

has therefore become final and

conclusive, we are amending our final

results of the fourth administrative

review of the antidumping duty order

on CTVs from Korea with respect to

Samsung.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 7, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Joseph Hanley or Zev Primor, Office of

Antidumping Compliance, Import

Administration, International Trade

Administration, U.S. Department of

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution

Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230;

telephone: (202) 482–5253.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Scope of the Review

Imports covered by this review

include CTVs, complete and

incomplete, from the Republic of Korea.

This merchandise is currently classified

under item numbers 8528.10.80,

8529.90.15, 8529.90.20, and 8540.11.00

of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule

(HTS). Since the order covers all CTVs

regardless of HTS classification, the

HTS subheading is provided for

convenience and for the U.S. Customs

Service purposes. Our written

description of the scope of the order

remains dispositive. The period of

review is April 1, 1986 through March

31, 1987.

Amended Final Results of Review

On September 21, 1994, the CIT

ordered the Department to: (1)

Recalculate the value-added tax (VAT)

adjustment according to its new

methodology, (2) treat bad debt

expenses as direct selling expenses if

the data warrant an adjustment, (3)

reconsider its treatment of home market

warranty expenses, (4) consider home

market inventory carrying cost

information, and (5) reconsider the

imputation of expenses in determining

the amount of value added for exporter’s

sales price (ESP) adjustment purposes.
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 235 / Thursday, December 7, 1995 / Notices 62825

On January 30, 1995, the Department

submitted to the CIT the final results of

redetermination of the fourth

administrative review.

On March 15, 1995, the CIT issued a

second order remanding to the

Department the January 30, 1995, final

results of redetermination. In its

opinion, the CIT ordered the

Department to treat home market

warranty expenses as direct selling

expenses for the purposes of the

circumstance-of-sale adjustment. As a

result of our recalculations, we have

determined that the following

percentage weighted-average margin

exists for the period April 1, 1986

through March 31, 1987:

Manufacturer/exporter Percent

margin

Samsung ..................................... 0.29

Because the CIT’s decision affirming

our redetermination has become final

and conclusive, the Department will

order the immediate lifting of the

suspension of liquidation and instruct

the U.S. Customs Service to assess

antidumping duties on entries subject to

this review, as appropriate. Individual

differences between foreign market

value and U.S. price may vary from the

percentage stated above. The

Department will issue appraisement

instructions concerning these entries

directly to the U.S. Customs Service.

This notice serves as a reminder to

importers of their responsibility under

19 CFR 353.26 to file a certificate

regarding the reimbursement of

antidumping duties prior to liquidation

of the relevant entries during the review

period. Failure to comply with this

requirement could result in the

Secretary’s presumption that

reimbursement of antidumping duties

occurred and the subsequent assessment

of double antidumping duties.

This amendment of final results of

review and notice are in accordance

with section 751(f) of the Tariff Act (19

U.S.C. 1673(d)(1994)) and 19 CFR

353.28(c).

Dated: November 21, 1995.

Susan G. Esserman,

Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 95–29892 Filed 12–6–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

[A–580–008]

Color Television Receivers From the

Republic of Korea; Amended Final

Results of Antidumping Duty

Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of amended final results

of antidumping duty administrative

review.

SUMMARY: On March 27, 1991, the

Department of Commerce (the

Department) published the final results

of the fifth administrative review of the

antidumping duty order on color

television receivers (CTVs) from the

Republic of Korea (Korea) (56 FR

12701). The review covered the period

April 1, 1987, through March 31, 1988.

On September 21, 1994, the Court of

International Trade (CIT) remanded to

the Department for redetermination the

final results of the fifth administrative

review of Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

(Samsung)(Slip Op. 94–149). On January

30, 1995, the Department submitted to

the CIT the final results of

redetermination. On March 16, 1995,

the CIT issued a second order (Slip Op.

95–48) remanding to the Department the

January 30, 1995, final results of

redetermination. On April 14, 1995, the

Department submitted a second final

results of redetermination to the CIT. On

May 31, 1995, the CIT affirmed the

Department’s second redetermination

(Slip Op. 95–101). Since the CIT’s ruling

was not appealed, and the CIT’s

decision affirming our redetermination

has therefore become final and

conclusive, we are amending our final

results of the fifth administrative review

of the antidumping duty order on CTVs

from Korea with respect to Samsung.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 7, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Joseph Hanley or Zev Primor, Office of

Antidumping Compliance, Import

Administration, International Trade

Administration, U.S. Department of

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution

Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230;

telephone: (202) 482–5253.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Scope of the Review

Imports covered by this review

include CTVs, complete and

incomplete, from the Republic of Korea.

This merchandise is currently classified

under item numbers 8528.10.80,

8529.90.15, 8529.90.20, and 8540.11.00

of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule

(HTS). Since the order covers all CTVs

regardless of HTS classification, the

HTS subheading is provided for

convenience and for the U.S. Customs

Service purposes. Our written

description of the scope of the order

remains dispositive. The period of

review is April 1, 1987 through March

31, 1988.

Amended Final Results of Review

On September 21, 1994, the CIT

ordered the Department to: (1)

Recalculate the value added tax (VAT)

adjustment according to its new

methodology, (2) treat bad debt as a

direct selling expense if sufficient data

exists, (3) reconsider its treatment of

home market warranty expenses, and (4)

reconsider the classification of

forwarding expenses. On January 30,

1995, the Department submitted to the

CIT the final results of redetermination

of the fifth administrative review.

On March 16, 1995, the CIT issued a

second order remanding to the

Department the January 30, 1995, final

results of redetermination. In its

opinion, the CIT ordered the

Department to treat home market

warranty expenses as direct selling

expenses for the purposes of the

circumstance-of-sale adjustment. As a

result of our recalculations, we have

determined that the following

percentage weighted-average margin

exists for the period April 1, 1987

through March 31, 1988:

Manufacturer/exporter Percent

margin

Samsung ..................................... 0.10

Because the CIT’s decision affirming

our redetermination has become final

and conclusive, the Department will

order the immediate lifting of the

suspension of liquidation and instruct

the U.S. Customs Service to assess

antidumping duties on entries subject to

this review, as appropriate. Individual

differences between foreign market

value and U.S. price may vary from the

percentage stated above. The

Department will issue appraisement

instructions concerning these entries

directly to the U.S. Customs Service.

This notice serves as a reminder to

importers of their responsibility under

19 CFR 353.26 to file a certificate

regarding the reimbursement of

antidumping duties prior to liquidation

of the relevant entries during the review

period. Failure to comply with this

requirement could result in the

Secretary’s presumption that

reimbursement of antidumping duties

occurred and the subsequent assessment

of double antidumping duties.