alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The
undersigned, Dongmei Wu, the Chief Financial Officer of CHINA SKYRISE DIGITAL
SERVICE INC. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1.     The
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2009
(the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement this 14th day of December,
2009.

| |                                                                        | 
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
| | /s/ Dongmei
 Wu                                                        | 
| |                                                                        | 
| | Dongmei Wu                                                             | 
| | Chief
 Financial Officer (Principal
 Financial and Accounting Officer) | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to China Skyrise Digital Service Inc. and will be retained by
China Skyrise Digital Service Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
such filing.

---
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

EXHIBIT B 

COMPENSATION BY CATEGORY FOR SERVICES RENDERED 

BY DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP FOR THE PERIOD 

JULY 1, 2019 THROUGH JULY 31, 2019 

Categories Hours Fees 

2019 Audit Services 1,963.0 $410,633.00 

AB 1054 Wildfire Fund 111.1 $75,934.00 

Accounting Consultations 9.7 $3,783.00 

California Wildfires 64.3 $37,458.00 

Lease Accounting Services 2.5 $872.50 

New Accounting Standards 42.0 $16,671.00 

Post Bankruptcy Matters 98.0 $50,178.00 

Preparation of Fee Applications 32.1 $6,969.00 

Regulatory Accounting 4.5 $2,616.00 

Fees Category Subtotal : 2,327.2 $605,114.50 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4817-2 Filed: 11/19/19 Entered: 11/19/19 17:44:20 Page 1

of 1
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

____________ No. 23-50606 Summary Calendar

____________ United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee ,

versus Carlos Guillermo Leon-Hernandez, Defendant—Appellant

.

______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:22-CR-1835-1

______________________________ Before Davis, Ho, and Ramirez, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam: * Carlos Guillermo Leon-Hernandez was convicted of conspiracy to transport aliens and the transporta tion of aliens. On appeal, LeonHernandez challenges the denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained following his detention by border patrol agents. He argues that the district

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 1, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-50606 Document: 61-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/01/2024No. 23-50606

2 court erred in determining the moment he was seized and that agents lacked reasonable suspicion for the seizure. Whether a person has been seized or detained under the Fourth Amendment is a factual finding that is reviewed for clear error. United States v. Mask , 330 F.3d 330, 334-35 (5th Cir. 2003). “Whether law enforcement has reasonable suspicion to conduct an in vestigatory stop is a legal conclusion that is reviewed de novo.” United States v. Alvarez , 40 F.4th 339, 344 (5th Cir. 2022). We generally defer to factfinders who hear live testimony and uphold the district court’s ruling if th ere is any reasonable view of the evidence supporting it. See United States v. Wright , 57 F.4th 524, 530 (5th Cir. 2023). In light of the evidence and all the circumstances surrounding the incident, we cannot say that the distri ct court clearly erred in determining that Leon-Hernandez was seized when an agent demanded his car keys, as prior to that, there was not a sufficien t show of authority to constitute detention. See Wright , 57 F.4th at 530-32. Next, we consider whether the tota lity of the circumstances supports a reasonable suspicion of criminal ac tivity justifying the seizure. See Alvarez , 40 F.4th at 345. We conclude there wa s no error, given the fictitious paper license plate on Leon-Hernandez’s vehi cle; an agent’s knowledge, from his experience with the Border Patrol, that vehicles with alien smuggling loads often used fictitious paper license plates; the tip from a confidential source, whom the agent had known for 12 or 13 years, about unknown people coming and going at a specific address late at night; the agent’s knowledge that the area where the residence was located ha d a large number of stash houses for alien smuggling schemes; and the observat ion of four people in the back seat of Leon-Hernandez’s vehicle, which genera lly had capacity for only three.
AFFIRMED. Case: 23-50606 Document: 61-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/01/2024
EXHIBIT 31.1

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(D)/15D-14(D)
                    UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Anthony N. Renzi, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  report  on Form  10-K and all  reports  on Form  10-D
   required to be filed in respect of the period  covered by this report on Form
   10-K of RALI Series 2007-QH1 Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2. Based on my knowledge,  the Exchange Act periodic reports,  taken as a whole,
   do not contain  any untrue  statement  of a material  fact or omit to state a
   material  fact  necessary  to make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of the
   circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not  misleading  with
   respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based  on  my  knowledge,  all  of  the  distribution,  servicing  and  other
   information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
   this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities  performed by the servicers and
   based on my knowledge and the compliance  reviews  conducted in preparing the
   servicer  compliance  statements  required in this report  under Item 1123 of
   Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic  reports,
   the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements
   in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance  with  servicing  criteria for
   asset-backed  securities and their related  attestation reports on assessment
   of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to
   be included in this report in accordance  with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
   Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
   report,  except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
   of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report
   on Form 10-K.

In giving the  certifications  above,  I have  reasonably  relied on information
provided  to me by the  following  unaffiliated  parties:  Deutsche  Bank  Trust
Company Americas.

Date:  March 24, 2008


By:    /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
Title: Managing Director
(senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5448 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 20, 2014 

Received 

AN ACT 

To amend the John F. Kennedy Center Act to authorize 

appropriations for the John F. Kennedy Center for the 

Performing Arts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5448 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘John F. Kennedy Cen3 ter Reauthorization Act of 2014’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

5 Section 13 of the John F. Kennedy Center Act (20 

6 U.S.C. 76r) is amended by striking subsections (a) and 

7 (b) and inserting the following: 

8 ‘‘(a) MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, AND SECURITY.— 

9 There is authorized to be appropriated to the Board to 

10 carry out section 4(a)(1)(H)— 

11 ‘‘(1) $22,200,000 for fiscal year 2015; 

12 ‘‘(2) $23,000,000 for fiscal year 2016; 

13 ‘‘(3) $24,000,000 for fiscal year 2017; 

14 ‘‘(4) $26,000,000 for fiscal year 2018; and 

15 ‘‘(5) $27,000,000 for fiscal year 2019. 

16 ‘‘(b) CAPITAL PROJECTS.—There is authorized to be 

17 appropriated to the Board to carry out subparagraphs (F) 

18 and (G) of section 4(a)(1)— 

19 ‘‘(1) $12,200,000 for fiscal year 2015; 

20 ‘‘(2) $16,000,000 for fiscal year 2016; 

21 ‘‘(3) $13,000,000 for fiscal year 2017; 

22 ‘‘(4) $13,000,000 for fiscal year 2018; and 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 5448 RDS 

1 ‘‘(5) $14,000,000 for fiscal year 2019.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 19, 

2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

Certifications

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned officer of Keystone Automotive Operations, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended September 29, 2007 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |     |  |                                                     
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 12, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Donald T. Grimes                                
|                        |  |     |  | Donald T. Grimes                                    
|                        |  |     |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 and is not being filed as
part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### W. C. Epting, plaintiff in error, vs. John Jones, defendant in error.

(Montgomery, Judge, was providentially prevented from presiding in this case )

It is no good plea to a suit upon a promissory note that the suit is brought by the true owner in a fictitious name, it not appearing by the plea that the defendant lias any defense to the note.

John Jones brought complaint against W. C. Epting on a promissory note, dated September 4th, 1867, due on January 1st, thereafter, for $1,268 13, payable to William M. Fudge, or bearer, with the following indorsement thereon:

“May 26th, 1871.

“For value received I assign the within note to James F. Gaines. [Signed] William M. Fudge.”

The defendant pleaded the general issue, and several special pleas, all of which are unnecessary to an understanding of the decision of the Court.

Upon the trial the defendant proposed to amend his pleas, by setting up (he fact that the plaintiff had no existence at the time the declaration was filed in said cause, nor had any existence at the lime of the trial, but was a fictitious person to whom the defendant never had been indebted, and that said *623suit was commenced in the name of said fictitious person, to prevent the defendant from making his defense to said action. The amendment did not show what constituted the defense of which he was deprived. The Court refused to allow the amendment upon the ground that such a plea, if filed, would be demurrable, aud the defendant excepted.

The plaintiff introduced the note and closed. The defendant introduced no testimony. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff.

The defendant assigns error upon the aforesaid ground of exception.

Thomas P. Loyd; C. T. Goode; S. R. Goode; N. A. Smith, for plaintiff in error.

No appearance for defendant.

McCay, Judge.

According to the claim of the plea, this suit is really brought by the true owner of the note. He has used a fictitious name, but nevertheless it is his act, and the paygment of it to him, in whatever name, will be an unquestionable satisfaction of the debt. Had the plea set forth some defense, good against the true owner, and not against a stranger, or had the plea set out that the plaintiff was a tortious holder, so that the payment to him would not be good, by one having notice of the want of title, something might be said in favor of the plea. But as it stands it claims that the real owner is the movant, that he is suing his own note in another man’s name. How does, or can this hurt the defendant? A matter of costs might arise if it appeared that the nominal plaintiff was insolvent, or purely fictitious, but that could be met by a deposit of the costs.

We find no fault with the judgment refusing to dismiss the suit. The real rights of the parties will be settled by the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-15-00011-CV

David P. Desenberg, Flatmax Energy, L. P., Flatmax Oil & Gas, L.L.C., Keith H. Baker, 

Reagan Rich, and Big Reef Energy, L.L.C.

v.

Everest Resource Company C-5 Oil & Gas, Ltd

On Appeal from the

319th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2014-DCV-5125-G

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

May 28, 2015
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4493 Filed: 10/28/19 Entered: 10/28/19 15:25:57 Page 1 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4493 Filed: 10/28/19 Entered: 10/28/19 15:25:57 Page 2 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4493 Filed: 10/28/19 Entered: 10/28/19 15:25:57 Page 3 of

3
---

CONSENT OF M. HASSAN ALIEF

The undersigned hereby consents to:

|(i) | the filing of the written disclosure (the Technical
      Disclosure) regarding:
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    | (a)                                                                               
|    |                                                                                   
|    | (b)                                                                               
|    |                                                                                   
|    | (c)                                                                               
|    |                                                                                   
|    | (d)                                                                               

contained in the Annual Information Form for the period ended
December 31, 2014 (the AIF) of Energy Fuels Inc. (the Company) being filed
as an exhibit to the Companys Form 40-F Annual Report for the period ended
December 31, 2014, and any amendments thereto (the 40-F), being filed with the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC);

|(ii)  | the incorporation by reference of such Technical
      Disclosure in the 40-F and the AIF into the Companys Form S-8
      Registration Statement (File No. 333-194900), filed with the SEC, and any
      amendments thereto (the S-8);
|----- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|(iii) | the incorporation by reference of such Technical
      Disclosure in the AIF into the Companys Form F-10 Registration Statement
      (File No. 333-194916), filed with the SEC, and any amendments thereto (the
      F-10); and       
|      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|(iv)  | the use of my name in the AIF, the F-10, the 40-F and the
      S-8.                                                                                                                                                                       

| | /s/ M.
      Hassan Alief
| | -------------------------
| | M. Hassan Alief          

Date: March 19, 2015

---
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 32504]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13732]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE



Drug Enforcement Administration




Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application



    This is notice that on March 23, 2010, Stepan Company, Natural 

Products Department, 100 W. Hunter Avenue, Maywood, New Jersey 07607, 

made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration 

(DEA) for registration as an importer of Coca Leaves (9040), a basic 

class of controlled substance listed in schedule II.

    The company plans to import the listed controlled substance for the 

manufacture of a bulk controlled substance for distribution to its 

customer.

    As explained in the Correction to Notice of Application pertaining 

to Rhodes Technologies, 72 FR 3417 (2007), comments and requests for 

hearings on applications to import narcotic raw material are not 

appropriate.

    As noted in a previous notice published in the Federal Register on 

September 23, 1975, (40 FR 43745), all applicants for registration to 

import a basic class of any controlled substance in schedule I or II 

are, and will continue to be, required to demonstrate to the Deputy 

Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement 

Administration, that the requirements for such registration pursuant to 

21 U.S.C. 958(a), 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and 21 CFR 1301.34(b), (c), (d), 

(e), and (f) are satisfied.



    Dated: May 28, 2010.

Joseph T. Rannazzisi,

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 

Enforcement Administration.

[FR Doc. 2010-13732 Filed 6-7-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
#### STATE v. OSCAR HOLDER (and Others Not Appealing).

(Filed 28 November, 1956.)

Appeal by defendant Oscar Holder from *Gwyn, J.,*at 6 February, 1956, Criminal Term of GuilfoRD.

*105Criminal prosecution upon bill of indictment No. 4140 charging defendants Oscar Holder and Roxie Holder, *alias*Roxie Cumbee, with felonious assault upon one E. H. Hennis, with a deadly weapon, to wit, a certain rock, with intent to kill, inflicting serious injury, not resulting in death, consolidated for trial with other bills of indictment, including No. 4139 charging E. H. Hennis with assault upon Oscar Holder with a deadly weapon.

Upon trial in Superior Court the case was submitted to the jury upon evidence offered, and under the charge of the court.

Verdict in No. 4140: Both defendants are guilty of assault with deadly weapon.

Judgment: As to defendant Roxie Holder, *alias*Roxie Cumbee, prayer for judgment continued; and as to defendant Oscar Holder, judgment is that he be confined in common jail of Guilford County for the term of twelve (12) months, to be assigned to work under supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission.

Defendant Oscar Holder appeals therefrom to Supreme Court and assigns error.

*Attorney-General Patton and Assistant Attorney-General Love for the State.*

*Adam Younce and T. Glenn Henderson for Defendant Appellant.*

PeR Cubiam.

The evidence offered upon the trial below taken in the light most favorable to the State, is abundantly sufficient to take the casé to the jury, and to support the verdict returned by the jury, on which judgment rests.

And upon consideration of all exceptions taken in the course of the trial, and to the charge of the court, as a whole, prejudicial error is not made to appear. Hence in the judgment from which appeal is taken there is

No error.

JohnsoN, J., not sitting.
EX-35.2
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


American Home Mortgage Assets, LLC.
538 Broadhollow Road
Melville, NY 11747



RE: Annual Statement as to Compliance

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows for the calendar year
2007 or applicable portion thereof (the "Reporting Period"):

(a) a review of Wells Fargo's activities as Master Servicer and/or Securities
Administrator under the servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto
(the "Servicing Agreement(s)") has been made under my supervision; and

(b) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review Wells Fargo has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all
material respects throughout the Reporting Period.


March 1, 2008
/s/ Joshua Kelly
JOSHUA KELLY
Vice President


(page)


(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


Schedule A

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series

1 Master Servicing Agreement for American Home Mortgage Investment Trust
  2007-SD2, Mortgage Backed Notes, Series 2007-SD2, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as
  Master Servicer

2 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for American Home Mortgage Assets Trust
  Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-5, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as
  Master Servicer and Securities Administrator, as applicable

3 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for American Home Mortgage Assets Trust
  Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-1, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as
  Master Servicer and Securities Administrator, as applicable

4 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for American Home Mortgage Assets Trust
  Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-2, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as
  Master Servicer and Securities Administrator, as applicable

5 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for American Home Mortgage Assets Trust
  Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-3, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as
  Master Servicer and Securities Administrator, as applicable

6 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for American Home Mortgage Assets Trust
  Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-4, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as
  Master Servicer and Securities Administrator, as applicable