alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5466 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5466

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 4500 Sunny Isle Shopping Center in Christiansted, St. Croix, United 
 States Virgin Islands, as the ``Florence Louise Thomas Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 15, 2014

 Mrs. Christensen introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
            the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 4500 Sunny Isle Shopping Center in Christiansted, St. Croix, United 
 States Virgin Islands, as the ``Florence Louise Thomas Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FLORENCE LOUISE THOMAS POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 4500 Sunny Isle Shopping Center in Christiansted, St. Croix, 
United States Virgin Islands, shall be known and designated as the 
``Florence Louise Thomas Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Florence 
Louise Thomas Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>       THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION
               EXTRACTED FROM  THE QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT  TO SECTION
               13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES  EXCHANGE  ACT  OF 1934 FOR
               THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                    MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               10,349
<SECURITIES>                                         20,160
<RECEIVABLES>                                        13,020
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     50,125
<PP&E>                                                2,726
<DEPRECIATION>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       63,198
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                20,569
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                 28
<OTHER-SE>                                           42,169
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         63,198
<SALES>                                               9,060
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     14,537
<CGS>                                                   434
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         2,706
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     14,314
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (2,009)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             10
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (2,019)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (2,019)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        ($0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        ($0.07)



</TABLE>
113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 573 

AN ACT 

To amend Public Law 93–435 with respect to the Northern 

Mariana Islands, providing parity with Guam, the Virgin 

Islands, and American Samoa. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 573 EH

1 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The first section and section 2 of 

3 Public Law 93–435 (48 U.S.C. 1705, 1706) are amended 

4 by inserting ‘‘the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana 

5 Islands,’’ after ‘‘Guam,’’ each place it appears. 

6 (b) REFERENCES TO DATE OF ENACTMENT.—For 

7 the purposes of the amendment made by subsection (a), 

8 each reference in Public Law 93–435 to the ‘‘date of en9 actment’’ shall be considered to be a reference to the date 

10 of the enactment of this section. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 15, 2013. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 573 

AN ACT 

To amend Public Law 93–435 with respect to the 

Guam, the Virgin Islands, and American Samoa. Northern Mariana Islands, providing parity with
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5718 

To study the effect of the Earth’s magnetic field on the weather. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 14, 2014 

Mr. STOCKMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Science, Space, and Technology 

A BILL 

To study the effect of the Earth’s magnetic field on the 

weather. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stockman Effect Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. MAGNETIC FIELD STUDY. 

6 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds as follows: 

7 (1) Prior to a magnetic polar shift, there is a 

8 decline in the Earth’s magnetic fields. 

9 (2) Decrease in magnetic fields could impact 

10 global temperatures. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5718 IH

1 (3) There is a possibility that the reason Mars 

2 lost its atmosphere was because of the loss of its 

3 magnetic field. 

4 (b) MAGNETIC FIELD STUDY.—The director of the 

5 National Science Foundation shall commission a study on 

6 the impact that a shift in the Earth’s magnetic field could 

7 have on the weather. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**Certification by the Chief Executive OfficerPursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report of Northwest AirlinesCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Douglas M. Steenland, President and Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| Date: August  9, 2005                  |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                   |
| /s/ Douglas  M. Steenland              |   |
| Douglas M. Steenland                   |
| President and Chief Executive  Officer |

 

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except tothe extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the“Exchange Act”).  Such certification willnot be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under theSecurities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extentthat the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lionbridge Technologies, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Rory J. Cowan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Donald M. Muir, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 10, 2008



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/S/ RORY J. COWAN                    
|Rory J. Cowan Chief Executive Officer



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|                                      
|/S/ DONALD M. MUIR                    
|Donald M. Muir Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of KKR Financial Holdings LLC (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), William C. Sonneborn, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael R.
McFerran, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



February 28, 2011/s/ WILLIAM C. SONNEBORN William C. Sonneborn Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ MICHAEL R. MCFERRAN Michael R. McFerran Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001058441
<NAME> RAINBOW RENTALS
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             108
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     33,661
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,369
<PP&E>                                           5,046
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,325
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,470
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,039
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,554
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    51,325
<SALES>                                            592
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,386
<CGS>                                            7,173
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,173
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,756
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 197
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,293
<INCOME-TAX>                                       938
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,355
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,355
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23


</TABLE>
Exhibit 33.1.5.4

 

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

First American Real Estate Solutions of Texas, L.P. (an indirect subsidiary of The First American Corporation and the “Asserting Party”) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2007, and for the period from January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007 (the “Reporting Period”) with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Sections 229.1122(d)(1)(iv), (d)(2)(v), (d)(2)(vi), (d)(2)(vii), (d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii) and (d)(4)(xiii) of the Code of Federal Regulations applicable to the Asserting Party (“the Applicable Servicing Criteria”). The transactions covered by this report include all loans for residential and commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Asserting Party served as the residential and commercial tax service provider (“the Platform”).

 

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2007, and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform taken as a whole.

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2007, and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

 

FIRST AMERICAN REAL ESATE SOLUTIONS OF TEXAS, L.P.

By: First American Real Estate Solutions LLC

|   | General Partner |
|--------|-----------------|

 

 

/s/ Lucy A. Przybyla

Lucy A. Przybyla

Senior Vice President

February 12, 2008
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF A P P E A LS E LE V E N T H C IR C U IT AUGUST 1, 2007 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R T HE EL EV EN TH CIRC UI T

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ N o. 06- 1661 0 Non-A rgum ent Calendar

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ D.C. Dock etNos . 06 -2 10 54 -CV-ASG & 0 0- 40 61 3- BKC-AJ IN RE: EXTENSIS MANAGEMENT, INC.,

EV ER SMIL E D EN TA L, IN C. D e b t o r s .

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ EXTENSIS MANAGEMENT, INC., EVERSMILE DENTAL, INC., Pl ai nti ff s- Appe llants , ve rs us CHRIS TIE'S INC., De fendant-Appellee.

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ Appeal f rom the United State s District Court fo r the S outhe rnD istri ct

of F lor ida

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ (A ug us t 1, 200 7) Be fo re A N D E RS O N , BA RKE T T and C O X , Ci rc uit Jud ge s.2

PE R CU RIA M: Extensis Managem ent, I nc. a nd E ve r smi l e D e nt a l , I nc . , A

pp e l l ants, seek review of the district court's judgm ent affir m ing the orders o f th e Bankruptcy Court which allowed the claim

of Christie's, Inc. , Appellee. W e ha ve c onsi de re d th e br ie fs , and re le va nt part s of the r ec or d, and f

ind no
re ve rs ibl e er

ro r. W e co nc lud e that the or de rs of the Bankr upt cy Co urt w er e pr ope rl y affi rm edforth e rea so ns st at edin th e di st ric t cou rt' s well -rea so ne d o pi ni on . (R.1- 18 .) AFFIRMED.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A

- CR

- 1230 | August 29, 2018 Page 1 of 2



### MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case.



### A TTORNEY FOR 

### A PPELLANT Yvette M. LaPlante Keating & LaPlante, LLP Evansville, Indiana 

### A TTORNEY S FOR 

### A PPELLEE Curtis T. Hill, Jr. Attorney General Caroline G. Templeton Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana



### I N T H E 

# COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

Amber Krieg , Appellant

- Defendant,

v.


### State of Indiana , Appellee

- Plaintiff August 29, 2018 Court of Appeals Ca se No. 18A

- CR

- 1230 Appeal from the Vanderburgh Superior Court The Honorable Robert J. Pigman, Judge Trial Co urt Cause No. 82D03

- 1511

- F4

- 7265



### Vaidik , Chief Judge
.

[1] 

### Amber Krieg appeals the revocation of her placement in the Vanderburgh
Co unty Community Corrections work

- release program

. We reverse. Krieg wasCourt of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A

- CR

- 1230 | August 29, 2018 Page 2 of 2



### accused of violating Condition 14 of the work

- release program, which provides, “I will not use or consume any illegal drugs, or controlled substances without a valid current prescription.” Ex. 1. 1 

### The only evidence the State presented to show that Krieg violated this condition was the testimony of two residential officers who believed that Krieg was “intoxicated” and “under the influence of an unknown substance ” one day at the work

- release facility . Tr. pp. 6, 10, 14, 15. The problem with this evidence is that even prescribed drugs can c ause a person to be intoxicated. See , e.g., Alfrey v. State , 960 N.E.2d 229, 234 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012), trans. denied

. As such, the mere fact that Krieg appeared intoxicated does not , standing alone, support the conclusi on that she used or consumed an illegal or unprescribed drug. Notably, Krieg testified at the revocation hearing that she had been prescribed Seroquel ( which can cause drowsiness, according to the FDA ), that she had taken a dose the night before she was o bserved to be intoxicated, and that she felt “a little drowsy” and “[a] little groggy” when she woke up the next day. Tr. pp . 17

- 18. The State failed to prove that Krieg had taken anything other than that dose of Seroquel.

[2] 

### Reversed.

Riley, J., and Kirsc h, J., concur

.

1 The petition to revoke that was filed alleged that Krieg had violated “section IV of the VCWR Handbook,” which apparently provides that “any use or possession of intoxicants, unauthorized or illegal drug is strictly prohibited.” Appellant’s App. Vol. II p. 57. At the revocation hearing, however, no mention was mad e of that provision. The hearing focused on Condition 14 of the work

- release program. Tr. p. 6. Similarly, the State discusses only Condition 14 of the work

- release program in its brief on appeal.
EXHIBIT 32


    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Raven Moon Entertainment, Inc.
(the "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Joey DiFrancesco, President, Chief Executive Officer and principal
financial officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.


Dated: November 18, 2005


                                            /s/  Joey DiFrancesco
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Joey DiFrancesco, President,
                                                 Chief Executive Officer and
                                                 principal financial officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6185

JOSEPH OKOH,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of 

Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District 

Judge. (2:12-cv-00626-MSD-LRL)

Submitted: June 26, 2014 Decided: July 1, 2014

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Okoh, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Eldridge Jeffrey, III, 

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Okoh seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying 

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is 

not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Okoh has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability, we deny leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#  Delegation of Authority to Appoint Commissioned Officers of the Ready Reserve Corps of the Public Health Service 

# Memorandum for the Secretary of Health and Human Services 

By virtue of the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I hereby assign to you the functions of the President under section 203 of the Public Health Service Act, as amended by Public Law 111-148, to appoint commissioned officers of the Ready Reserve Corps. The exercise of this authority is limited to appointments of individuals who were extended offers of employment for appointment and call to active duty in the Reserve Corps of the Public Health Service with an appointment date subsequent to March 23, 2010, the date of enactment of Public Law 111-148, but who were not on active duty on that date, and those individuals who are selected for the 2010 Commissioned Officer Student Training and Extern Program. This authority may not be re-delegated. 

                    You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the                     *Federal Register*.                 

[FR Doc. 2010-13844

Billing code 4150-42-P Folio: 1635