alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

M. Ryan Pinkston (SBN 310971) 

rpinkston@seyfarth.com 

560 Mission Street, Suite 3100 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 397-2823 

Facsimile: (415) 397-8549 

Attorneys for 

Turner Construction Company

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION, 

- and - 

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, 

Debtors. 

☐ Affects PG&E Corporation 

☒ Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company

☐ Affects both Debtors 

*All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case, 

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Bankruptcy Case

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Chapter 11 

(Lead Case) 

(Jointly Administered) 

TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY’S 

NOTICE OF PERFECTION OF LIEN 

PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. § 546(b)

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4910 Filed: 12/01/19 Entered: 12/01/19 12:40:40 Page 1 of

5
1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 362(b)(3) and 546(b), Turner Construction Company (“Turner”) hereby 

gives notice of its perfection of, maintenance and continuation of perfection of, and intention to enforce 

to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, see, e.g., California Civil Code § 8400 et seq., Turner’s 

duly recorded mechanic’s lien for labor, equipment, material, and services provided by Turner to Pacific 

Gas and Electric Company, as more fully described in the attached Exhibit A. See Village Nurseries v. 

Gould (In re Baldwin Builders), 232 B.R. 406 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 1999); Village Nurseries v. Greenbaum, 

101 Cal. App. 4th 26 (2002). This notice is in addition to, and not in lieu of, Turner’s right and intention 

to enforce its lien to the fullest extent permitted by law. Turner reserves all rights. 

DATED: December 1, 2019 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

By: /s/ M. Ryan Pinkston 

M. Ryan Pinkston 

Attorneys for Turner Construction Company

56430669v.1 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4910 Filed: 12/01/19 Entered: 12/01/19 12:40:40 Page 2 of

5
EXHIBIT A 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4910 Filed: 12/01/19 Entered: 12/01/19 12:40:40 Page 3 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4910 Filed: 12/01/19 Entered: 12/01/19 12:40:40 Page 4 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4910 Filed: 12/01/19 Entered: 12/01/19 12:40:40 Page 5 of

5
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,910,383
<SECURITIES>                                    22,540
<RECEIVABLES>                                  498,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,291,348
<PP&E>                                     104,111,040
<DEPRECIATION>                              23,657,004
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              86,838,106
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,840,874
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,001,481
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                86,838,106
<SALES>                                      6,377,062
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,436,245
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,950,117
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,595,377
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                937,865
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   937,865
<EPS-BASIC>                                       5.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     5.41


</TABLE>
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4675 Filed: 11/12/19 Entered: 11/12/19 13:38:55 Page 1 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4675 Filed: 11/12/19 Entered: 11/12/19 13:38:55 Page 2 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4675 Filed: 11/12/19 Entered: 11/12/19 13:38:55 Page 3 of

3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY TO SUCH FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       7,029,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,219,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   252,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,398,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,955,000
<PP&E>                                       2,839,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 591,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,695,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          868,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  4,800,000
<COMMON>                                    17,135,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (8,108,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,695,000
<SALES>                                      1,849,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,913,000
<CGS>                                        1,298,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,339,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                33,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,459,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,459,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,459,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.12)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 32493]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13742]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY



Federal Emergency Management Agency



[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1917-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2010-0002]




Oklahoma; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 

Declaration



AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.



ACTION: Notice.



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 

for the State of Oklahoma (FEMA-1917-DR), dated May 24, 2010, and 

related determinations.



DATES: Effective Date: May 28, 2010.



FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Recovery Directorate, 

Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 

20472, (202) 646-3886.



SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 

for the State of Oklahoma is hereby amended to include the following 

areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 

the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration 

of May 24, 2010.



    Creek and Garvin Counties for Individual Assistance.



(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 

are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 

Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 

97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 

Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 

Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in 

Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 

Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 

Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster 

Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 

Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 

Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)



W. Craig Fugate,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2010-13742 Filed 6-7-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5386 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 11662 Gravois Road in St. Louis, Missouri, 

as the ‘‘Lt. Daniel P. Riordan Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5386 EH

1 SECTION 1. LT. DANIEL P. RIORDAN POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 11662 Gravois Road in St. 

4 Louis, Missouri, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Lt. Daniel P. Riordan Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lt. Daniel P. Riordan 

10 Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 17, 

2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5386 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office’’. Louis, Missouri, as the ‘‘Lt. Daniel P. Riordan al Service located at 11662 Gravois Road in St.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BAKER 

&

HOSTETLER LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

Robert A. Julian (SBN 88469)

Cecily A. Dumas (SBN 111449)

BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP

1160 Battery Street, Suite 100

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: 628.208.6434

Facsimile: 310.820.8859

Email: rjulian@bakerlaw.com

Email: cdumas@bakerlaw.com

Eric E. Sagerman (SBN 155496)

David J. Richardson (SBN 168592)

Lauren T. Attard (SBN 320898)

BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP

11601 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1400

Los Angeles, CA 90025-0509

Telephone: 310.820.8800

Facsimile: 310.820.8859

Email: esagerman@bakerlaw.com

Email: drichardson@bakerlaw.com

Email: lattard@bakerlaw.com

Counsel for Official Committee of Tort Claimants

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION

-andPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY,

Debtors

Case No. 19-30088 (DM)

Chapter 11

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

NOTICE OF FILING OF MOTION TO 

FILE REDACTED DECLARATION OF 

JAMES DRINKHALL IN SUPPORT OF 

THE OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF TORT 

CLAIMANTS’ MOTION PURSUANT TO 

11 U.S.C. §§ 105(a) AND 501 AND FED. R. 

BANKR. P. 3003(c) FOR ENTRY OF AN 

ORDER EXTENDING THE BAR DATE

Date: November 13, 2019

Time: 9:30 a.m. (Pacific Time)

Place: United States Bankruptcy Court

Courtroom 17, 16th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94102

San Francisco, CA 94102

□ Affects PG& E Corporation

□ Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company

■ Affects both Debtors

*All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case, 

No. 19-30088 (DM)

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4320 Filed: 10/18/19 Entered: 10/18/19 17:35:49 Page 1 of

2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BAKER 

&

HOSTETLER LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

- 2 -

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on October 18, 2019, the Official Committee of Tort 

Claimants (the “TCC”) filed a motion (the “Redaction Motion”) pursuant to sections 105(a) and 

107(b) of title 11 of the United States Code, Rule 9018 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy 

Procedure, Rule 1001-2(a) of the Bankruptcy Local Rules for the United States District Court for 

the Northern District of California and the New District Wide Procedures for Electronically Filing 

Sealed and Redacted Documents adopted by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern 

District of California for an entry of an order granting the TCC’s request to file a redacted 

declaration of James Drinkhall. In support of this Redaction Motion, the TCC also filed the 

Declaration of David J. Richardson contemporaneously therewith.

Dated: October 18, 2019

BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP

By: /s/ David J. Richardson

David J. Richardson 

Counsel for The Official Committee of Tort 

Claimant

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4320 Filed: 10/18/19 Entered: 10/18/19 17:35:49 Page 2 of

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           11275
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 21690
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       4997
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                            1663
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                              6659
<LOANS>                                         224545
<ALLOWANCE>                                       2659
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  267580
<DEPOSITS>                                      247122
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               1605
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          9880
<OTHER-SE>                                        8973
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  267580
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   5363
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                   81
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   302
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  5746
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                2555
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2555
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             3190
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      120
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   1756
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1771
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        1771
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1046
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .65
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    9.46
<LOANS-NON>                                        151
<LOANS-PAST>                                      1653
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   1804
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  2539
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 2659
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              2659
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            656
        

</TABLE>
C.J. Having considered petitioner's arguments and the documents before us, we conclude that petitioner has not met his burden of demonstrating that this court's intervention by way of extraordinary writ relief is warranted. 

### See id. We therefore deny the petition. 

### See NRAP 21(b)(1); 

### Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851.

It is so ORDERED.

Saitta

cc: Hon. Elliott A. Sattler, District Judge Hon. Bridget Robb Peck, District Judge Shaun Allen Robinson University of Nevada, Reno, Office of General Counsel Enzenberger, Hughs & Herbolsheimer Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2
(0) 1947A 

### e
#### Augustus J. Mercier, plaintiff in error, *vs.*Georgia A. Mercier, defendant in error.

*The*verdict in this case is fully sustained by the evidence, and this Court will, in its judgment, award damages against the plaintiff in error, on the ground that the case was brought up for delay only.

Evidence. Damages. New trial. Before Judge Harrell. Early Superior Court. April Term, 1872.

Georgia A. Mercier brought complaint against Augustus J. Mercier for one sewing machine, of the value of $150, aud of the annual value of $25.

It appeared, from the evidence, that the sewing machine, a “Wheeler & Wilson,” was purchased by plaintiff’s father, George Mercier, in New York, at the price of $125; that her said father gave the sewing machine to plaintiff; that she had used said machine, seven or eight years prior to leaving her father’s house in 1868; that a few months after plaintiff left her father’s house, he died, and the machine went into the possession of tiie defendant, who was the executor of her father’s will; that before the institution of suit she demanded said machine from defendant, and he refused to deliver it up; that plaintiff was the only one of the family that could use the machine; that “Wheeler *&*Wilson’s machines” are now worth, with attachments, from $60 to $175, the high priced ones being cased; that the casing makes them more costly; that the rent of such machines are worth per annum from $10 to $50; that the machine in controversy had no attachments; that plaintiff demanded possession of the machine in February, 1869.

At the April Term, 1872, of said Court, the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff for $200, “being the value and rent of the sewing machine.”

Defendant moved for a new trial upon the ground that the verdict was contrary to evidence and to law. The motion *644was overruled by the Court, and plaintiff in error excepted, and assigns said ruling as error.

J. E. Bower; R. Sims, by brief, for plaintiff in error.

Thomas F. Jones; H. Fielder, for defendant.

McCay, Judge.

We do not see any ground for reversing the judgment of the Court in this case. The only pretence of error is, that he ought to have set aside the verdict as contrary to evidence, and we think he was right in not doing this. If the verdict of a jury is not to stand because the proof on which it is founded is not clearly in its favor, our whole theory of jury trials will be subverted. We have so often and so decidedly declared our opinions on this subject, that we do not care again to go over them. The jury is just as much a final arbiter, in its sphere, as the Court, and in matters of fact, it is generally far more apt to be right. The consent of twelve minds to a verdict is a pretty sure evidence of its correctness. And the error ought to be very plain for one mind to set it aside.

As we have said, we see no good reason for this bill of exceptions. We think this lady has been improperly delayed in this matter, and we award her the damages authorized by law in such cases, and judgment will be so entered.

Judgment affirmed.
EXPENSE CATEGORY AMOUNT

Airfare $ 203,745.28 

Lodging 335,236.83 

Meals 40,830.99 

Ground Transportation 60,698.83 

Other 1,823.26 

TOTAL EXPENSES $ 642,335.19 

Exhibit C

AP SERVICES, LLC

Summary of Expenses - Pacific Gas and Electric Company, et al.

For the Period October 1, 2019 -October 31, 2019

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4958-3 Filed: 12/03/19 Entered: 12/03/19 14:20:55 Page 1

of 1
Amendment of the RadiSys Corporation 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan



 Exhibit 10.1 
 Amendment of the 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan 
 WHEREAS, it is proposed that the Corporation
amend its 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “1996 Plan”) to include a holding period on the transfer of shares of the Corporation’s common stock acquired under the 1996 Plan; and 
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it advisable and in the best interest of the Corporation to amend the 1996 Plan to include a holding period on the
transfer of shares acquired under the 1996 Plan; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that, by virtue and in exercise of the power reserved to
the Board of Directors by Section XIII of the 1996 Plan, Section V of the 1996 Plan be, and hereby is, amended to add the following sentence at the end of the paragraph under the caption “TRANSFER OF SHARES” to read as follows: 

 

	
	“Notwithstanding the foregoing, subject to the terms of Section VII addressing a Participant’s termination of Employment or death, the full Shares purchased and delivered to the
Custodian by the Company after August 15, 2009, shall be held in the Participant’s Custodial Account for a period of twelve (12) months immediately following the applicable Purchase Date and shall not be delivered to or disposed of by
the Participant during such twelve (12) month holding period unless otherwise required by applicable law or to satisfy the Participant’s tax obligations under Section XIII, or unless otherwise determined by the Company consistent with the
requirements of Section 423, and provided further, that the twelve (12) month holding period shall immediately expire upon the Participant’s death or upon the Participant’s termination of Employment for any
reason.”

 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Section VIII of the 1996 Plan be, and hereby is, amended by deleting
the last sentence under the caption “INTEREST IN SHARES” in its entirety and replacing it with the following: 
  

	
	“After the purchase of Shares, the Participant shall be entitled to all rights of a stockholder of the Company, subject to the terms and provisions of this Plan.”

 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Section XIII of the 1996 Plan be, and hereby is, amended to add the
following sentence at the end of the paragraph under the caption “TAX WITHHOLDING” to read as follows: 
  

	
	“Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, the Company may retain from the Shares purchased and delivered to the









	
	Custodian a sufficient number of Shares to satisfy any applicable federal, state, local or foreign tax withholding, including any or all income tax, social insurance contributions, payroll tax,
payment on account or other tax-related withholding obligations attributable to the purchase of Shares under the Plan that the Employer determines is necessary and/or appropriate in its discretion.”

  

 -2-