alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5543 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate certain segments 

of East Rosebud Creek in Carbon County, Montana, as components 

of the Wild and Scenic Rivers System. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 

Mr. DAINES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate 

certain segments of East Rosebud Creek in Carbon 

County, Montana, as components of the Wild and Scenic 

Rivers System. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘East Rosebud Wild 

5 and Scenic Rivers Act’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5543 IH

1 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF WILD AND SCENIC RIVER SEG2 MENTS. 

3 Section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 

4 U.S.C. 1274(a)) is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(208) EAST ROSEBUD CREEK, MONTANA.—(A) 

7 The portions of East Rosebud Creek in the State of 

8 Montana, consisting of— 

9 ‘‘(i) the 13-mile segment from the source 

10 in the Absaroka-Beartooth Wilderness down11 stream to the point at which the Creek enters 

12 East Rosebud Lake, including the stream reach 

13 between Twin Outlets Lake and Fossil Lake, to 

14 be administered by the Secretary of Agriculture 

15 as a wild river; and 

16 ‘‘(ii) the 7-mile segment on the Custer Na17 tional Forest from immediately below, but not 

18 including, the outlet of East Rosebud Lake 

19 downstream to the point at which the Creek en20 ters private property for the first time, to be 

21 administered by the Secretary of Agriculture as 

22 a recreational river. 

23 ‘‘(B) No private property shall be included 

24 within the boundaries of the river segments des25 ignated by this paragraph. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5543 IH

1 ‘‘(C) No land or interests in land may be ac2 quired by condemnation within the boundaries of the 

3 river segments designated by this paragraph. 

4 ‘‘(D) Nothing in this paragraph creates or au5 thorizes the creation of a protective perimeter or 

6 buffer zone around the boundaries of the river seg7 ments designated by this paragraph. The fact that 

8 an activity or use can be seen or heard from within 

9 such boundaries shall not preclude the conduct of 

10 that activity or use outside such boundaries.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Page 1
                           ALL-STATE PROPERTIES L.P.                          
                            (A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)                           
                            FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE                           
                     THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996                    
                                  (UNAUDITED)




                                                                          
EXHIBIT 27

Cash                                                           $      8,423
Receivables                                                           2,930
Real Estate and Construction in Progress                            105,635
Total Assets                                                        121,833
Notes Payable                                                       528,886
Convertible Subordinated Debentures                               2,384,452
Partners' Deficit                                                (3,846,590)
Total  Liabilities and Partners' Deficit                            121,833
Net Sales of Real Estate                                            175,000
Total Revenues                                                      157,205
Cost of Real Estate Sold                                            108,419
Total Cost and Expenses                                             149,700
Net Income                                                            7,505
Income Per Partnership Unit                                            0.00
































                      See notes to financial statements. 

                                                                      Page 2
                                                                      








                                  SIGNATURES                                  

Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Registrant
has  duly  caused this report to be signed on its behalf  by  the  undersigned
thereunto duly authorized.



                                       ALL-STATE PROPERTIES L.P.



                                   By:                                       
                                            STANLEY R. ROSENTHAL
                                               General Partner






Dated:      November 14,     1996      ______________________
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5537 

To require the Comptroller General to conduct a study of the interoperability 

of computer systems used by hospitals to store and access electronic 

health records, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 

Mr. MCKINLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To require the Comptroller General to conduct a study of 

the interoperability of computer systems used by hospitals to store and access electronic health records, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STUDY ON INTEROPERABILITY OF COMPUTER 

4 SYSTEMS USED BY HOSPITALS TO STORE AND 

5 ACCESS ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS. 

6 (a) STUDY.—The Comptroller General shall conduct 

7 a study of the interoperability of computer systems used 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5537 IH

1 by hospitals to store and access electronic health records, 

2 which shall explore— 

3 (1) the extent to which it is possible for such 

4 computer systems to be interoperable to enable au5 thorized personnel of more than one hospital to ac6 cess and update the electronic health records of the 

7 same patient; 

8 (2) the identity of hospitals in the United 

9 States that use, at the time the study is conducted, 

10 computer systems with the ability to allow author11 ized personnel of more than one hospital to access 

12 and update the electronic health records of the same 

13 patient; 

14 (3) the reasons why hospitals in the United 

15 States do not have computer systems with such abil16 ity at the time the study is conducted; and 

17 (4) the extent to which increased interoper18 ability of such computer systems allows hospitals to 

19 more effectively coordinate the care of patients. 

20 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 6 months after date of 

21 the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall 

22 submit to the Committee on Ways and Means of the 

23 House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy 

24 and Commerce of the House of Representatives a report 

25 on the study conducted under subsection (a), including 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5537 IH

1 such recommendations as the Comptroller General con2 siders appropriate regarding the use of interoperable com3 puter systems by hospitals to store and access electronic 

4 health records as a method of improving the coordination 

5 of care of patients. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Derrick Talerico (SBN 223763)

dtalerico@ztlegal.com 

David B. Zolkin (SBN 155410)

dzolkin@ztlegal.com

ZOLKIN TALERICO LLP

12121 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1120 

Los Angeles, CA 90025 

Tel: (424) 500-8551

Fax: (424) 500-8951

Attorneys for Western Electricity 

Coordinating Council

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION

-andPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY,

Debtors.

Bankruptcy Case No. 19-30088 (DM)

Chapter 11

(Lead Case) (Jointly Administered)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION OF 

WESTERN ELECTRICITY 

COORDINATING COUNSEL TO FILE 

PROOFS OF CLAIM AND ANY 

AMENDMENTS THERETO UNDER SEAL

Affects PG&E Corporation

Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company

Affects both Debtors

* All papers shall be filed in the Lead 

Case, No. 19-30088 (DM)

[No Hearing Required]

Signed and Filed: October 15, 2019

________________________________________

DENNIS MONTALI

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

Entered on Docket 

October 16, 2019

EDWARD J. EMMONS, CLERK 

U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4238 Filed: 10/15/19 Entered: 10/16/19 15:47:47 Page 1 of

2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

The Court having considered the Motion of Western Electricity Coordinating Council to 

File Proofs of Claim and any Amendments Thereto Under Seal (the “Motion”), filed by Western 

Electricity Coordinating Council (“WECC”), filed on October 10, 2019,

1

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Motion is GRANTED.

2. WECC is authorized to file its proofs of claims against the Debtor, and any 

amendments thereto, under seal pursuant to Section 105(a) of the Bankruptcy Code and 

Bankruptcy Rule 9018.

3. WECC’s proofs of claims are confidential, shall remain under seal, and shall not be 

made available to anyone without the written consent of WECC and the Debtor, except that copies 

of the proofs of claim shall be provided to the Court on a strictly confidential basis.

4. Notwithstanding Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h), the terms and conditions of this Order

shall be immediately effective and enforceable upon its entry.

5. This Court shall retain jurisdiction to hear and determine all matters arising from or

related to the implementation, interpretation, or enforcement of this Order.

** END OF ORDER **

1 Capitalized terms used but not otherwise herein defined shall have the meanings ascribed 

to them in the Motion.

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4238 Filed: 10/15/19 Entered: 10/16/19 15:47:47 Page 2 of

2
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 7536

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

,

v.

SIGMUND DIAOLA JAMES, a/k/a Sig

,

Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Orangeburg

. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior District Judge. ( 5:08

- cr

- 00944

- MBS

- 1 )

Submitted : July 22, 2021 Decided: August 9, 2021

Before AGEE and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Sigmund Diaola James , Appellant Pro Se. Jane Barrett Taylor, Assistant U nited States Attorney

, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , Columbia , South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Sigmund Diaola James appeals the district court’s order granting in part and denying

in part his motion seeking a sentence modification under § 404(b) of the First Step Act of

2018, Pub. L. No. 115

- 391, 132 Stat. 5194. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order

. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contention s are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**Certification of the Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to**

**Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Exchange Act**

 

I, Paul Pluschkell,certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof HyperFeed Technologies, Inc.;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have:

 

(a)           designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)           evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

(c)           disclosed in this report any changein the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)           all significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

(b)           any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: August 4, 2005

 

 
|   | /s/ Paul Pluschkell                    |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Paul Pluschkell                        |
|   | President and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">County Line Pharmacy, as Assignee of Earline Vaughns, Respondent, 	<br>against<br> GEICO Insurance Company, Appellant. </font></b></div><br><br><party role="defendant&lt;Body&gt;&lt;P&gt;">Law Office of Printz &amp; Goldstein (Lawrence J. Chanice of counsel), for appellant.Lewin &amp; Baglio, LLP (Brendan Kearns of counsel), for respondent.<p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Ulysses Bernard Leverett, J.), entered October 29, 2014. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the branches of defendant's cross motion seeking summary judgment dismissing so much of the complaint as sought to recover for prescription drugs provided to plaintiff's assignor on December 1, 2010 and December 30, 2010.</p><p>ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed from, is reversed, with $30 costs, and the branches of defendant's cross motion seeking summary judgment dismissing so much of the complaint as sought to recover for prescription drugs provided to plaintiff's assignor on December 1, 2010 and December 30, 2010 are granted.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Civil Court as denied the branches of defendant's cross motion seeking summary judgment dismissing so much of the complaint as sought to recover for prescription drugs provided to plaintiff's assignor on December 1, 2010 and December 30, 2010. The Civil Court found that an issue of fact exists as to the medical necessity of the prescription drugs at issue.</p><p>In support of its cross motion, defendant submitted an orthopedist's affirmed report of an independent medical examination which he had performed on plaintiff's assignor. The report set forth a factual basis and medical rationale for the orthopedist's determination that the assignor's injuries had resolved and that there was a lack of medical necessity for the prescription drugs at issue. Plaintiff failed to oppose defendant's cross motion. Consequently, defendant's prima facie showing of lack of medical necessity was not rebutted by plaintiff.</p><p>Accordingly, the order, insofar as appealed from, is reversed, and the branches of defendant's cross motion seeking summary judgment dismissing so much of the complaint as sought to recover for prescription drugs provided to plaintiff's assignor on December 1, 2010 and December 30, 2010 are granted. </p><p>PESCE, P.J., WESTON and ALIOTTA, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: April 13, 2018<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></party></partyblock>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 543 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 543

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify presumptions relating 
 to the exposure of certain veterans who served in the vicinity of the 
              Republic of Vietnam, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2013

Mr. Gibson (for himself, Mr. Walz, Mr. Massie, Mr. Holt, Ms. Pingree of 
   Maine, Mr. Tierney, Mr. Grijalva, Ms. Edwards, Mr. Cicilline, Mr. 
 Rahall, Ms. Clarke, Mr. Conyers, Ms. Schwartz, Mr. Young of Florida, 
Mr. Hanna, Mr. Tonko, Mr. Lewis, Mr. Courtney, Ms. Norton, Mr. Scott of 
Virginia, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Thornberry, Mr. Bridenstine, Mr. Barletta, 
   Mr. Griffin of Arkansas, Mr. Rush, Mr. Braley of Iowa, Mr. Poe of 
   Texas, Mr. Himes, Mr. Meeks, Mr. Grimm, Mr. Rangel, Mr. Young of 
Alaska, Mr. Michaud, Mr. McIntyre, Mr. Polis, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Mr. King 
of New York, Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, Mr. Stivers, Mr. Welch, Mr. Israel, and 
  Mr. Larson of Connecticut) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify presumptions relating 
 to the exposure of certain veterans who served in the vicinity of the 
              Republic of Vietnam, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Blue Water Navy Vietnam Veterans Act 
of 2013''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF PRESUMPTIONS OF EXPOSURE FOR VETERANS WHO 
              SERVED IN VICINITY OF REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM.

    (a) Compensation.--Subsections (a)(1) and (f) of section 1116 of 
title 38, United States Code, are amended by inserting ``(including the 
territorial seas of such Republic)'' after ``served in the Republic of 
Vietnam'' each place it appears.
    (b) Health Care.--Section 1710(e)(4) of such title is amended by 
inserting ``(including the territorial seas of such Republic)'' after 
``served on active duty in the Republic of Vietnam''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsections (a) and (b) 
shall take effect as of September 25, 1985.
                                 <all>
```
EXPENSE CATEGORY AMOUNT

Airfare $ 130,618.02 

Lodging 259,110.32 

Meals 29,403.43 

Ground Transportation 42,359.40 

Other 101.68 

TOTAL EXPENSES $ 461,592.85 

Exhibit C

AP SERVICES, LLC

Summary of Expenses - Pacific Gas and Electric Company, et al.

For the Period November 1, 2019 -November 30, 2019

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5335-3 Filed: 01/10/20 Entered: 01/10/20 10:06:47 Page 1

of 1
---

CONSENT OF DAVID A. ROSS

The undersigned hereby consents to:

(i) the filing of the written disclosure (the Technical
Disclosure) regarding (a) the technical report entitled Technical Report on
the Arizona Strip Uranium Project, Arizona, U.S.A. dated June 27, 2012 and (b)
the technical report entitled Technical Report on the EZ1 and EZ2 Breccia
Pipes, Arizona Strip District, U.S.A. dated June 27, 2012, contained in the
Annual Information Form for the period ended December 31, 2014 (the AIF) of
Energy Fuels Inc. (the Company) being filed as an exhibit to the Companys
Form 40-F Annual Report for the period ended December 31, 2014, and any
amendments thereto (the 40-F), being filed with the United States Securities
and Exchange Commission (the SEC);

(ii) the incorporation by reference of such Technical
Disclosure in the 40-F and the AIF into the Companys Form S-8 Registration
Statement (File No. 333-194900), filed with the SEC, and any amendments thereto
(the S-8);

(iii) the incorporation by reference of such Technical
Disclosure in the AIF into the Companys Form F-10 Registration Statement (File
No. 333-194916), filed with the SEC, and any amendments thereto (the F-10);
and

(iv) the use of our name in the AIF, the F-10, the 40-F and the
S-8.

| | /s/
      Davis A. Ross
| | -----------------------
| | David A. Ross, P.Geo.  

Date: March 19, 2015

|RPA Inc.55
      University Ave. Suite 501 | Toronto, ON, Canada M5J 2H7 | T+1
      (416) 947 0907 | www.rpacan.com
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------

---