alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BAKER 

&

HOSTETLER LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

LOS 

ANGELES

Robert A. Julian (SBN 88469)

Cecily A. Dumas (SBN 111449)

BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP

600 Montgomery Street, Suite 3100

San Francisco, CA 94111-2806

Telephone: 415-659-2900

Facsimile: 415-659-2601

Email: rjulian@bakerlaw.com

Email: cdumas@bakerlaw.com

Eric E. Sagerman (SBN 155496)

David J. Richardson (SBN 168592)

Lauren T. Attard (SBN 320898) 

BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP

11601 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1400

Los Angeles, CA 90025

Telephone: 310.820.8800

Facsimile: 310.820.8859

Email: esagerman@bakerlaw.com

Email: drichardson@bakerlaw.com

Email: lattard@bakerlaw.com

Counsel for Official Committee of Tort Claimants

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION

-andPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY,

Debtors.

Case No. 19-30088-(DM)

Chapter 11

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

NOTICE OF SUBPOENA ISSUED TO

DAVEY TREE SURGERY COMPANY; 

EXIGIS; FAMILY TREE SERVICE, 

INC.; LOGGERS UNLIMITED, INC.; 

MCKINSEY & COMPANY; MLU 

SERVICES, INC.; MOUNTAIN F. 

ENTERPRISES, INC.; NEWCOMB 

TREE EXPERTS, INC.; OSMOSE 

UTILITIES SERVICES, INC.; AND 

PHILLIPS AND JORDAN, INC. 

□ Affects PG& E Corporation

□ Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company

■ Affects both Debtors

*All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case,

No. 19-30088 (DM)

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5347 Filed: 01/10/20 Entered: 01/10/20 15:30:16 Page 1 of

2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BAKER 

&

HOSTETLER LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

LOS 

ANGELES

- 2 -

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on or about January 9, 2020, counsel for the Official 

Committee of Tort Claimants (“TCC”) issued and intends to serve subpoenas to produce 

documents, information, and/or objects (the “Production Subpoenas”) on the entities identified 

below. Copies of the Production Subpoenas are attached hereto as follows:

• Exhibit 1 – Davey Tree Surgery Company

• Exhibit 2 – Exigis

• Exhibit 3 – Family Tree Service, Inc.

• Exhibit 4 – Loggers Unlimited, Inc.

• Exhibit 5 – McKinsey & Company

• Exhibit 6 – MLU Services, Inc.

• Exhibit 7 – Mountain F. Enterprises, Inc. 

• Exhibit 8 – Newcomb Tree Experts, Inc.

• Exhibit 9 – Osmose Utilities Services, Inc.

• Exhibit 10 – Phillips and Jordan, Inc.

The items requested to be produced in the Production Subpoenas are described in 

Exhibit A to each of the Production Subpoenas.

Dated: January 10, 2020 BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP

By: /s/ David J. Richardson

Robert A. Julian

Cecily A. Dumas

David J. Richardson

Attorneys for The Official Committee of Tort 

Claimants

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on January 10, 2020, the foregoing was been served upon all parties 

or their attorneys in a manner authorized by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5(b)(1).

/s/ David J. Richardson

David J. Richardson

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5347 Filed: 01/10/20 Entered: 01/10/20 15:30:16 Page 2 of

2
#### In the Matter of: BRENDA CARROLL SUGGS, a Minor.

(Filed 14 October, 1953.)

Appeal and Error § 16—

A cause tried prior to the convening of the Spring Term of the Supreme Court must be docketed in the Supreme Court at that term twenty-one days prior to the call of the docket for the District to which it belongs, and failure to docket it at the proper term compels dismissal notwithstanding any agreement of the parties or allowance of time by the trial judge for perfecting the appeal. Rule of Practice in the Supreme Court No. 5.

Appeal by respondent from *Williams, J.,*in Chambers, at Sanford, N. 0., 11 October 1952.

Petition to determine the custody of an infant.

Summons herein was issued and the petition was filed 16 September 1952. The cause was heard 11 October 1952, and judgment was entered 21 January 1953, awarding custody of the infant to its paternal grandparents. The respondent excepted and appealed. She was allowed until 15 April 1953 to serve case on appeal, and petitioner was allowed sixty days thereafter in which to file exceptions or serve counterease.

*HooJcs & Britt for respondent appellant.*

*Wilson & Johnson for petitioner appellee.*

Per Curiam.

This cause was tried prior to the convening of the Spring Term 1953 of this Court. It was the duty of the appellant to docket her appeal in this Court at that term, twenty-one days prior to the call of the docket of the Fourth Judicial District, to which this case belongs. It was actually docketed 4 September 1953, after the Fall Term had convened.

Neither an agreement of the parties nor the allowance of time by the judge for perfecting the appeal will excuse the delay. Rule 5, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N.C. 546, is mandatory and cannot he abrogated by consent or otherwise. Failure to docket as thus required results in the loss of the right of appeal and necessitates dismissal. *Jones v. Jones,*232 N.C. 518, 61 S.E. 2d 335; *Pruitt v. Wood,*199 N.C. 788, 156 S.E. 126; *S. v. Presnell,*226 N.C. 160, 36 S.E. 2d 927.

Here the cause was heard on affidavits. If the affidavits were filed with the clerk as a part of the record, as they should have been, then a case on appeal was not required. *Privette v. Allen,*227 N.C. 164, 41 S.E. 2d 364; *Russos v. Bailey,*228 N.C. 783, 47 S.E. 2d 22; *Reece v. Reece,*231 N.C. 321, 56 S.E. 2d 641; *Wilson v. Chandler, ante,*p. 401. In any event, a ease on appeal which would be composed exclusively of affidavits could have been prepared and served in the course of a day or *414so. Allowance of a total of more than 120 days extending tbe time beyond tbe date for docketing in tbis Court was unnecessary. Had it been necessary to protect ber right of appeal, appellant bad an adequate remedy by a writ of *certiorari.*

Perhaps it will occur to appellant that tbis disposition of ber appeal does not close tbe door to a further bearing.

Appeal dismissed.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-11150

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RONDRICK LAMAR GRAY,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

6:10-CR-23-1

ON REMAND FROM

THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before BENAVIDES, PRADO, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

This Court previously affirmed the sentence of Appellant because

United States v. Tickles, 661 F.3d 212 (5th Cir. 2011) (per curiam), held that

the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 (“FSA”) does not apply retroactively to a

defendant who is sentenced after the effective date of the FSA if the offense

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 17, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 10-11150 Document: 00512086357 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/17/2012
No. 10-11150

preceded that effective date. See 661 F.3d at 214–15. However, in United

States v. Berry, No. 11-51050, 2012 WL 5906899 (5th Cir. Nov. 26, 2012) (per

curiam), this Court determined that Tickles had been overruled by Dorsey v.

United States, 132 S. Ct. 2321 (2012). In Dorsey, the Supreme Court

announced that the more lenient penalties of the FSA apply to offenders who

were sentenced after the effective date of the FSA if the underlying offense

was committed before the effective date of the FSA. 132 S. Ct. at 2326.

The Supreme Court granted certiorari, vacated, and remanded this case

for further consideration in light of Dorsey. We, therefore, VACATE the

judgment of sentence and REMAND for resentencing in accordance with

Dorsey.

2

 Case: 10-11150 Document: 00512086357 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/17/2012
Exhibit 35.1

                                                          [LOGO] IndymacBank(SM)


                       REG AB 1123 Statement of Compliance

I am an authorized officer for IndyMac Bank, F.S.B, the servicer for the
transaction listed below and I certify:

a)    A review of IndyMac Bank's activities during the reporting period and of
      its performance under the applicable servicing agreement has been made
      under my supervision.

b)    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, except as set forth
      below IndyMac Bank has fulfilled all of its obligations under the
      agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.

c)    None


                                By: /s/ Robert M. Abramian
                                    ----------------------
                                    Robert M. Abramian
                                    First Vice President
                                    Home Loan Servicing
                                    Investor Reporting
                                    Indymac Bank


                                By: /s/ Barbara Perez
                                    ----------------------
                                    Barbara Perez
                                    Senior Vice President
                                    Indymac Bank



Prepared for:   Deutsche Bank

Date:           February 28, 2007

Ref:            6022 - RAST 2006-A16 (LB)



                                                             www.indymacbank.com


             460 Sierra Madre Villa Ave., Pasadena, CA 91107   Tel: 626.535.5555
# Religious Freedom Day, 2010 

Long before our Nation’s independence, weary settlers sought refuge on our shores to escape religious persecution on other continents. Recognizing their strife and toil, it was the genius of America’s forefathers to protect our freedom of religion, including the freedom to practice none at all. Many faiths are now practiced in our Nation’s houses of worship, and that diversity is built upon a rich tradition of religious tolerance. On this day, we commemorate an early realization of our Nation’s founding ideals: Virginia’s 1786 Statute for Religious Freedom.

The Virginia Statute was more than a law. It was a statement of principle, declaring freedom of religion as the natural right of all humanity—not a privilege for any government to give or take away. Penned by Thomas Jefferson and championed in the Virginia legislature by James Madison, it barred compulsory support of any church and ensured the freedom of all people to profess their faith openly, without fear of persecution. Five years later, the First Amendment of our Bill of Rights followed the Virginia Statute’s model, stating, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof . . .”.

Our Nation’s enduring commitment to the universal human right of religious freedom extends beyond our borders as we advocate for all who are denied the ability to choose and live their faith. My Administration will continue to oppose growing trends in many parts of the world to restrict religious expression.

Faith can bring us closer to one another, and our freedom to practice our faith and follow our conscience is central to our ability to live in harmony. On Religious Freedom Day, let us pledge our constant support to all who struggle against religious oppression and rededicate ourselves to fostering peace with those whose beliefs differ from our own. In doing so, we reaffirm our common humanity and respect for all people with whom we share a brief moment on this Earth.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim January 16, 2010, as Religious Freedom Day. I call on all Americans to commemorate this day with events and activities that teach us about this critical foundation of our Nation’s liberty, and show us how we can protect it for future generations here and around the world.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fifteenth day of January, in the year of our Lord two thousand ten, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-fourth.

[FR Doc. 2010-1369

Billing code 3195-W0-P
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 300 Filed: 02/05/19 Entered: 02/05/19 14:47:25 Page 1 of 3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 300 Filed: 02/05/19 Entered: 02/05/19 14:47:25 Page 2 of 3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 300 Filed: 02/05/19 Entered: 02/05/19 14:47:25 Page 3 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EXHIBIT D

PROPOSED ORDER

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4721-4 Filed: 11/14/19 Entered: 11/14/19 13:23:41 Page 1

of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION,

- and -

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY,

Debtors.

□ Affects PG&E Corporation

□ Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company

■ Affects both Debtors

* All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case,

No. 19-30088 (DM).

Bankruptcy Case 

No. 19-30088 (DM)

Chapter 11

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

ORDER GRANTING FIRST INTERIM 

APPLICATION OF TRIDENT DMG 

FOR ALLOWANCE AND PAYMENT 

OF COMPENSATION AND 

REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES 

FOR THE PERIOD JULY 18, 2019 

THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2019

THIS MATTER came before the Court upon consideration of the First Interim Application 

for Allowance and Payment of Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses for the period July 

18, 2019 through September 30, 2019 [Docket No. XXX] (the “Application”), filed by Trident 

DMG (“Trident”), communications consultant for the Official Committee of Tort Claimants 

(“TCC”). Based upon the Court’s review and consideration of the Application, the declarations in 

support thereof, and the other records and pleadings filed in the above-captioned chapter 11 case, 

THE COURT HEREBY FINDS that notice of and opportunity for a hearing on the

Application was duly given, and that such notice was appropriate and sufficient under the 

particular circumstances. It appears to the Court that good cause exists for interim approval of the 

fees and expenses that Trident requested in the Application, pursuant to Section 330 of the 

Bankruptcy Code and Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 2016. The Court further finds that 

the fees and expenses requested in the Application are reasonable and have been earned.

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4721-4 Filed: 11/14/19 Entered: 11/14/19 13:23:41 Page 2

of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The Application is approved on an interim basis as reflected herein:

2. Awarding interim allowance of compensation for professional services rendered

during the Application Period in the amount of $109,537.01 consisting of $97,500.00 in fees 

occurred and $12,037.01 in actual and necessary expenses.

3. Authorizing and directing the Debtors to make prompt payment to Trident the total

amount of $73,399.51, which is the difference between the amount requested and the amount 

already paid by the Debtors pursuant to the Interim Compensation Order.

4. The Court retains jurisdiction over any issues or disputes arising out of or relating

to this Order.

*** END ORDER ***

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4721-4 Filed: 11/14/19 Entered: 11/14/19 13:23:41 Page 3

of 3
#### STATE v. ROBERT DUNLAP.

(Filed 18 September, 1935.)

Criminal Law L a — Appeal in this case is dismissed for defendant’s failure to make out and serve statement of case on appeal.

Where a defendant fails to make out and serve his statement of case on appeal within the time fixed, he loses his right to prosecute the appeal, and the motion of the Attorney-General to docket and dismiss must be allowed,-but where defendant is convicted of a capital felony, this will be done only after an inspection of the record for error appearing upon its face.

MotioN by State to docket and dismiss appeal.

*Attorney-General Seawell and Assistant Attorney-General Ailcen for the State.*

Stacy, C. J.

At the March Term, 1935, Buncombe Superior Court, the defendant herein, Robert Dunlap, was tried upon indictment charging him with the murder of one Pauline McMellan, alias Ola McMellan, which resulted in a conviction of murder in the first degree and sentence of death. From the judgment thus entered, the defendant gave notice of appeal to the Supreme Court, and by consent was allowed sixty days within which to make out and serve statement of case on appeal. The clerk certifies that nothing has been done towards perfecting the appeal; that the time for serving statement of case has expired, and that no extension of time for filing same has been recorded in his office. *S. v. Williams, ante,*352; *S. v. Brown,*206 N. C., 747, 175 S. E., 116.

The prisoner, having failed to make out and serve statement of case on appeal within the time fixed, has lost his right to prosecute the appeal, and the motion of the Attorney-General to docket and dismiss must be allowed. *S. v. Williams, supra; S. v. Johnson,*205 N. C., 610, 172 S. E., 219. It is customary, however, in capital cases, where the *433life of the prisoner is involved, to examine the record to see that no error appears upon its face. *S. v. Williams, supra; S. v. Goldston,*201 N. C., 89, 158 S. E., 926. This we have done in the instant ease without discovering any error on the face of the record. *S. v. Williams, supra; S. v. Hamlet,*206 N. C., 568, 174 S. E., 451.

The motion of the Attorney-General must be allowed. *S. v. Williams, supra,*and cases there cited.

Appeal dismissed.
|     |                                                                                                                       |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|     |                                                                                                                                                         |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership. |

|                                                                                                                    |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                    |
|                                                                                                               |
| /s/ CHARIF SOUKI                                                                                                   |
| Charif Souki                                                                                                       |
| Chief Executive Officer of Cheniere Energy Partners GP, LLC, the general partner of Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. |
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5320 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5320

 To direct the Attorney General to provide State officials with access 
   to criminal history information with respect to certain financial 
service providers required to undergo State criminal background checks, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 31, 2014

 Mr. Bachus (for himself, Mr. Sessions, and Ms. Moore) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial 
  Services, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Attorney General to provide State officials with access 
   to criminal history information with respect to certain financial 
service providers required to undergo State criminal background checks, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BACKGROUND CHECKS.

    Section 1511(a) of the S.A.F.E. Mortgage Licensing Act of 2008 (12 
U.S.C. 5110(a)) is amended--
            (1) by inserting after ``State-licensed loan originators'' 
        the following: ``, other financial service providers, or 
        related businesses''; and
            (2) by inserting before the period the following: ``, other 
        financial service providers, or persons working in related 
        businesses''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 104 (Tuesday, June 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 30410]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13104]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Interest Projects (SIPs): Outcomes of Screening American Indian/Alaska 
Native Women of Reproductive Age for Chronic Conditions in Reproductive 
Health Clinics & Technical Support for Health Systems Evaluations 
Within Africa and Asia under the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS 
Relief (PEPFAR) SIP 10-034 and SIP 10-038, Initial Review

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92- 463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:
    Time and Date: 1 p.m.-4 p.m., June 25, 2010 (Closed)
    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with 
provisions set forth in Section 552b(c) (4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., 
and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services 
Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters to be Discussed: The meeting will include the initial 
review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response 
to ``Outcomes of Screening American Indian/Alaska Native Women of 
Reproductive Age for Chronic Conditions in Reproductive Health Clinics 
& Technical Support for Health Systems Evaluations within Africa and 
Asia under PEPFAR, SIP 10-034 and SIP 10-038.''
    Contact Person for More Information: Michelle Mathieson, Public 
Health Analyst, National Center for Chronic Disease and Health 
Promotion, Office of the Director, Extramural Research Program Office, 
4770 Buford Highway, NE., Mailstop K-92, Atlanta, GA 30341, Telephone: 
(770) 488-3068, E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#89e4fde1b1c9eaedeaa7eee6ff"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0568716d3d456661662b626a73">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: May 21, 2010.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2010-13104 Filed 5-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>