J. S54034/15

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

: PENNSYLVANIA

Appellee :

:

v. :

:

CHRIS EDWARD JORDAN, :

:

Appellant : No. 597 EDA 2015

Appeal from the PCRA Order February 9, 2015

In the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County 

Criminal Division No(s).: CP-15-CR-0000257-1980

BEFORE: BOWES, PANELLA, and FITZGERALD,*JJ.

JUDGMENT ORDER BY FITZGERALD, J.: FILED MARCH 02, 2016

Appellant, Chris Edward Jordan, appeals from the order1entered in the 

Chester County Court of Common Pleas dismissing, as untimely, his third 

Post Conviction Relief Act2(“PCRA”) petition. Appellant argues he is entitled 

to resentencing based on the United States Supreme Court’s holding in 

Miller v. Alabama, 132 S. Ct. 2455 (2012). We reverse the PCRA court’s 

 

*

Former Justice specially assigned to the Superior Court.

1 The PCRA court order dismissing Appellant’s PCRA petition was signed on 

February 6, 2015, and Appellant purports to appeal from the order entered 

on that date. See Appellant’s Notice of Appeal, 2/26/15; PCRA Ct. Order, 

2/9/15. However, the PCRA court’s order contains a file-stamp indicating 

the order was filed on February 9, 2015. PCRA Ct. Order, 2/9/15. Thus, we 

have amended the caption accordingly.

2 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9541-9546.
J.S54034/15

- 2 -

order, vacate Appellant’s judgment of sentence, and remand for 

resentencing. 

On October 6, 1980, a jury convicted Appellant of first-degree murder3

and criminal conspiracy,4 which were committed while Appellant was a 

juvenile. On October 29, 1981, the trial court imposed a mandatory 

sentence of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. This Court 

affirmed Appellant’s judgment of sentence on August 5, 1983. 

Commonwealth v. Jordan, 3034 Phila. 1981 (Pa. Super. Aug. 5, 1983) 

(unpublished memorandum). On January 16, 1984, our Supreme Court 

denied Appellant’s petition for allowance of appeal. 

The PCRA court denied Appellant’s first PCRA petition5on June 19, 

2000. This Court affirmed on May 2, 2001, and our Supreme Court denied 

allowance of appeal. Commonwealth v. Jordan, 2144 EDA 2000 (Pa. 

Super. May 2, 2001) (unpublished memorandum), appeal denied, 796 A.2d 

 

3 18 Pa.C.S. § 2502(a).

4 18 Pa.C.S. § 903.

5 Appellant apparently filed a pro se petition for post-conviction relief in 

1988 that was never ruled on by the trial court. Appellant filed another pro 

se petition on January 10, 1997, which the PCRA court considered a timely, 

first PCRA petition. See Commonwealth v. Lesko, 15 A.3d 345, 361 (Pa. 

2011) (“The 1995 amendments to the [PCRA] . . . provide that if the 

judgment of sentence became final before the January 16, 1996 effective 

date of the amendments, a PCRA petition will be considered timely if it is 

filed within one year of that date, or by January 16, 1997.”).
J.S54034/15

- 3 -

979 (Pa. 2001). Appellant filed a second PCRA petition on July 10, 2010, 

which the PCRA court dismissed without a hearing. Appellant did not appeal.

On July 20, 2012,6 Appellant filed his third PCRA petition pro se, 

asserting his mandatory sentence was unconstitutional under Miller. On 

February 9, 2015, the PCRA court dismissed Appellant’s petition as untimely. 

Appellant filed a timely appeal and court-ordered Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b) 

statement.

On January 25, 2016, while the instant appeal was pending, the United 

States Supreme Court issued its decision in Montgomery v. Louisiana, 136 

S. Ct. 718 (2016) and held, “Miller announced a substantive rule of 

constitutional law. Like other substantive rules, Miller is retroactive[.]” 

Montgomery, 136 S. Ct. at 734. Thereafter, this Court issued its decision 

in Commonwealth v. Secreti, ___ A.3d ___, 2016 WL 513341 (Pa. Super. 

Feb. 9, 2016) and held the decision in Montgomery renders Miller

retroactive “effective as of the date of the Miller decision.” Secreti, ___ 

A.3d at ___, 2016 WL 513341 at *5. Therefore, pursuant to the decisions in

Miller, Montgomery, and Secreti, we reverse the order dismissing 

 

6 Appellant filed his petition twenty-five days after the decision in Miller was 

filed. 
J.S54034/15

- 4 -

Appellant’s PCRA petition, vacate his judgment of sentence, and remand for 

resentencing.7

Order reversed. Judgment of sentence vacated. Case remanded. 

Jurisdiction relinquished.

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.

Prothonotary

Date: 3/2/2016

 

7 On February 5, 2016, Appellant filed a petition seeking remand in light of 

Montgomery. Given our disposition, we deny Appellant’s petition as moot. 

The PCRA court also filed a “statement” and proposed order seeking remand 

for the purpose of correcting Appellant’s sentence to “life in prison, with the 

possibility of parole.” PCRA Ct. Statement, 2/5/16. We likewise deny the 

court’s request but direct it to this Court’s decision in Secreti, wherein we 

ordered resentencing in accordance with Commonwealth v. Batts, 66 A.3d 

286 (Pa. 2013). Secreti, ___ A.3d at ___, 2016 WL 513341 at *6.