alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Research Resources Special Emphasis Panel; CTSA Renewal.                    

*Date:*                         October 13-14, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hilton Rockville, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Mohan Viswanathan, PhD, Deputy Director, Office of Review, National Center for Research Resources, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Dem. 1, Room 1084, MSC 4874, Bethesda, MD 20892-4874, 301-435-0829,                         *mv10f@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research; 93.371, Biomedical Technology; 93.389, Research Infrastructure; 93.306, 93.333; 93.702, ARRA Related Construction Awards, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 1, 2010.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-13582 Filed 6-4-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### Charles Hadden, Individually, etc., Appellant, v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
#### Barclays Bank of New York, N. A., Respondent, v Heady Electric Co., Inc., et al., Appellants.

Submitted January 8, 1996;

decided March 26, 1996

Motion, insofar as Brian T. Heady seeks leave to appeal purportedly on behalf of Coral A. Heady and Heady Electric Co., Inc., dismissed upon the ground that Brian T. Heady is not the authorized legal representative of either Coral A. Heady or Heady Electric Co., Inc. and upon the further ground that Heady Electric Co., Inc. must appear by attorney *(see,*CPLR 321 [a]); motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Judge Levine taking no part.
| *      Confidential treatment has been requested for certain portions omitted      from this exhibit pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act      of 1934, as amended. Confidential portions of this Exhibit have been      separately filed with the Securities and Exchange      Commission. |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

| *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|
| *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |

----

| *      Confidential treatment has been requested for certain portions omitted      from this exhibit pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act      of 1934, as amended. Confidential portions of this Exhibit have been      separately filed with the Securities and Exchange      Commission. |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

| Party      A:                      (official      seal) | Party      B:                      (official      seal) |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Authorized      Representative:                                                                                                                                       | Authorized      Representative:                                                                                                                                       |
| Title:                                                                                                                                                                | Title:                                                                                                                                                                |
| Date:March      9, 2009                                                                                                                                               | Date:May      9, 2009                                                                                                                                                 |
#### Irvio Jiminez, Appellant, v City of New York et al., Defendants, and “John” Massar et al., Respondents.

[772 NYS2d 515]

*183Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Betty Owen Stinson, J.), entered November 21, 2002, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied plaintiff’s motion for a default judgment against the six individual defendants, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

No jurisdiction was obtained over the individually named correction officers, who concededly worked at Hikers Island, by means of substituted service at the Department of Correction headquarters in Manhattan *(see Lorensen v Digman,*1998 WL 37593, 1998 US Dist LEXIS 861 [ND NY, Jan. 27, 1998]). There are no disputed facts that would require a traverse hearing. In the absence of jurisdiction, these individuals were relieved of having to offer a meritorious defense or reasonable excuse for failing to answer the complaint *(European Am. Bank v*Legum, 248 AD2d 206, 208 [1998]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan and Gonzalez, JJ.
Exhibit 31.2         

CERTIFICATION

I, Gary Corsi, certify that: 

1.	I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (U.S.);

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) [Omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238];

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: November 14, 2005
#  Designating the Chairperson of the Defense Production Act Committee 

# Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense [and] the Secretary of Homeland Security 

Pursuant to the authority vested in me by section 722(b)(2) of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (section 11 of Public Law 111-67; 50 App. U.S.C. 2171)(the “Act”), I hereby designate the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Secretary of Defense as rotating Chairpersons of the Defense Production Act Committee (the “Committee”). The Chair shall rotate annually on April 1 of each year, with the Secretary of Homeland Security hereby designated to serve as Chairperson of the Committee for the remainder of this first term. The Secretary of Homeland Security and the Secretary of Defense are directed to formalize responsibilities for funding and administratively supporting the Committee through interagency agreement.

Furthermore, the Chairperson shall invite to each meeting of the Committee all Members of the Committee as defined in section 722(b) of the Act, and shall ensure that the reporting requirements of section 722(d) of the Act are fulfilled.

                    The Secretary of Homeland Security is hereby authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the                     *Federal Register*.                

[FR Doc. 2010-13659

Billing code 4410-10-P
EXHIBIT
32




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002




I, Garry
McHenry, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report on Form 10-Q of
All State Properties Holdings, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2008
(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of All State Properties Holdings,
Inc.





Date:  November
5, 2008





By: /s
/ Garry
McHenry


Garry
McHenry


President







A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
All State Properties Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by All-State Properties
Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
#### Adolph Ladenberg and Others, Appellants, v. Commercial Bank of Newfoundland, Defendant; The Merchants’ Bank of Canada, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion.
4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP

425 Lexington Ave

New York, NY 10017

Exhibit A 

Date 

Statement 

Filed 

Period 

Covered 

Total Compensation and 

Expenses Incurred for Period 

Covered 

Total Amount of 

Fees Authorized to 

be Paid Pursuant to 

Interim 

Compensation 

Order 

Total Amount of 

Expenses Authorized 

to be Paid Pursuant to 

Interim 

Compensation Order 

Objected 

Amount 

Holdback 

Fees Amount 

Fees Expenses 

Fees w/ No 

Objection 

(@ 80%) 

Expenses 

(@ 100%) 

Fees w/ No 

Objection 

(@ 20%) 

October 

30, 2019 

08/01/19

-

08/31/19 

$1,186,376.00 $28,806.37 $945,098.40 $28,806.37 $5,003.00 $236,274.60 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4848-1 Filed: 11/22/19 Entered: 11/22/19 13:52:01 Page 1

of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 -

ORDER GRANTING DAVID M. FELDMAN’S APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF 

ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP

DAVID M. FELDMAN, NY SBN 2633881

 dfeldman@gibsondunn.com

 (pro hac vice application pending)

MATTHEW K. KELSEY, NY SBN 4250296

 mkelsey@gibsondunn.com

 (pro hac vice application pending)

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

200 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10166-0193

Telephone: 212.351.4000

Facsimile: 212.351.4035

MICHAEL S. NEUMEISTER, SBN 274220

 mneumeister@gibsondunn.com

MICHELLE CHOI, SBN 313557

 mchoi@gibsondunn.com

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

333 South Grand Avenue

Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197

Telephone: 213.229.7000

Facsimile: 213.229.7520

Attorneys for the Ad Hoc Committee of

Holders of Trade Claims

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION 

-andPACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY,

 Debtors.

 Affects PG&E Corporation

 Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company

 Affects both Debtors

*All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case, No. 

19-30088 (DM).

Bankruptcy Case No. 19-30088 (DM)

Chapter 11

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

ORDER GRANTING DAVID M. 

FELDMAN’S APPLICATION FOR 

ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC 

VICE

Signed and Filed: October 11, 2019

________________________________________

DENNIS MONTALI

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

Entered on Docket 

October 11, 2019

EDWARD J. EMMONS, CLERK 

U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4195 Filed: 10/11/19 Entered: 10/11/19 14:03:32 Page 1 of

2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

ORDER GRANTING DAVID M. FELDMAN’S APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF 

ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP

DAVID M. FELDMAN, whose business address and telephone number is 

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP

200 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10166-0193

Telephone: 212.351.4000

and who is an active member in good standing of the bar of NEW YORK having applied in the aboveentitled action for admission to practice in the Northern District of California on a pro hac vice basis, 

representing the AD HOC COMMITTEE OF HOLDERS OF TRADE CLAIMS,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application is granted, subject to the terms and 

conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate appearance pro hac vice. 

Service of papers upon and communication with co-counsel designated in the application will 

constitute notice to the represented party. All future filings in this action are subject to the Bankruptcy 

Local Rules and Electronic Case Filing Procedures adopted by the United States Bankruptcy Court for 

the Northern District of California.

**END OF ORDER**

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4195 Filed: 10/11/19 Entered: 10/11/19 14:03:32 Page 2 of

2
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 17, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-10712 Conference Calendar

WARREN CHARLES REED, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus FNU MOORE, Officer, Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:04-CV-110

-------------------- Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Warren Reed, Texas prisoner # 597494, has appealed the district court’s order dismissing his civil rights complaint for failure to state a claim. Reed alleged in his complaint that he suffered injuries when the defendant backed a van, in which Reed was riding, into a metal pole. The negligent act of an official causing loss or injury will not, standing alone, state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Coon v. Ledbetter , 780 F.2d 1158, 1163 (5th Cir. 1986).No. 04-10712 -2- Reed contends for the first time on appeal that Officer Moore acted with deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment by denying him medical treatment in order to “keep the accident from being documented.” Although Reed did contend in the district court that he was denied medical treatment at the Robertson Unit at the time of the accident, as to Officer Moore, he alleged only that Moore told him not to complain if he wanted to reach his destination. Reed’s appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous.
See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. We caution Reed that the dismissal of this appeal as frivolous counts as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), as does the district court’s dismissal of his complaint. See Adepegba v.
Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). If Reed accumulates three “strikes” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), he will not be permitted to proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility, unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.
See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          -  [File No. 500-1]

                    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Sintec Co. Ltd. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended December 31, 2001.                          ( print page 31482)    

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed company. Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on June 1, 2010, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on June 14, 2010.

By the Commission.

Florence E. Harmon,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-13440 Filed 6-1-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Exhibit D 

Cravath works with the Debtors in determining the appropriate staffing for all matters, and 

proactively seeks opportunities to leverage the Debtors’ in-house legal and business resources 

whenever it is reasonable and cost-effective to do so. Cravath avoids duplication of effort when 

handling Debtor matters. Cravath makes reasonable efforts to maintain continuity in its staffing and 

provides the Debtors with ample notification if any material changes to staffing are made. In these 

Chapter 11 Cases and the related regulatory, investigative, criminal and litigation matters, staffing 

needs are fluid, and Cravath periodically changes the composition of certain members of its team to 

provide adequate resources or avoid duplication. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4804-4 Filed: 11/18/19 Entered: 11/18/19 18:21:07 Page 1

of 1
#### Iordanis ANASTASIADIS, Appellant, v. S.S. LITTLE JOHN, Appellee.

No. 22249.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

July 6, 1965.

Sidney Ravkind, Houston, Tex., for appellant.

William C. Bullard, Houston, Tex., for appellee.

For original opinion, see 5 Cir., 346 F.2d 281.

Before WISDOM and GEWIN, Circuit Judges, and HANNAY, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The appellant, in his petition for rehearing, presents additional facts which were not before the trial court and were not included in the record on appeal. The matters he presents relate largely to changed circumstances since the case was decided by the district court. Without prejudice to his pursuit of any appropriate remedies which may be available in the district court, the petition for rehearing is

Denied.
#### Emanuel Popper, Appellant, v. Henry Wallach and another, Respondents.

— Judgment affirmed, with costs and disbursements.