alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 15.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:



| | (1) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-177919) pertaining to the Stock Option Subscription Plans, BSA Subscription Plans and BCE Subscription Plans of Sequans Communications S.A.,
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-180487) pertaining to the BSA (Warrants) Issuance Agreements dated January 11, 2011 and March 8, 2011 of Sequans Communications S.A.,
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (3) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-187611) pertaining to the Stock Option Subscription Plan, BSA Subscription Plan and BSA (Warrants) Issuance Agreements dated June 26, 2012 of Sequans Communications
S.A,
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (4) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-194903) pertaining to the Stock Option Subscription Plan and BSA (Warrants) Issuance Agreements dated June 25, 2013 of Sequans Communications S.A; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (5) | Registration Statement (Form F-3 No. 333-198758) of Sequans Communications S.A;
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our
reports dated April 21, 2015, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Sequans Communications S.A. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Sequans Communications S.A. included in this Annual Report (Form
20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Ernst & Young Audit

/s/ Frédéric Martineau

Represented by
Frédéric Martineau

Paris  La Défense, France

April 21, 2015
Exhibit 31

                          FORM OF CERTIFICATION TO BE
                           PROVIDED WITH FORM 10-K


     Re: Securitized Asset Backed Receivables LLC Trust 2007-HE1, issued
         pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of January 1,
         2007, between Securitized Asset Backed Receivables LLC, as depositor,
         WMC Mortgage Corp., as a responsible party, NC Capital Corporation
         as responsible party, Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc. d/b/a HomEq
         Servicing, as servicer, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as
         trustee, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A, as custodian.

I, Paul Menefee, certify that:

     1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
Form 10-K of Securitized Asset Backed Receivables LLC Trust 2007-HE1 (the
"Exchange Act periodic reports");

     2.  Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,
taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
Report;

     3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and
other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the
period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
reports;

     4.  Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements
required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except
as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
material respects; and

     5.  All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
 criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as trustee.

Date: 3/28/08


/s/Paul Menefee
Paul Menefee
Vice President and
Chief Accounting Office
(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

**In the Matter of**

**WILLIAM R. KIEFER**

**PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT FROM INACTIVE STATUS**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: No. 58 DB 2015 (No. 49 RST 2015)** 

**Attorney Registration No. 22092** 

**(Out of State)**

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 4 th**  **day of August, 2015, the Report and Recommendation o f**  **Disciplinary Board Member dated July 27, 2015, is appro ved and it is ORDERED that**  **William R. Kiefer, who has been on Inactive Status, ha s never been suspended or**  **disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, competency and**  **learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is,**  **hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Ba r of this Commonwealth. The**  **expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of this matter shall**  **be paid by the Petitioner.**
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4494 Filed: 10/28/19 Entered: 10/28/19 15:28:00 Page 1 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4494 Filed: 10/28/19 Entered: 10/28/19 15:28:00 Page 2 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4494 Filed: 10/28/19 Entered: 10/28/19 15:28:00 Page 3 of

3
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Unizan Financial Corp.s (the
Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James H. Nicholson, Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                                
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------
|Date: November 9, 2004 |  | /s/ James H. Nicholson         
|                       |  | James H. Nicholson             
|                       |  | Executive Vice President, Chief
|                       |  | Operating Officer and Principal
|                       |  | Financial Officer
#### C. R. SCOTTEN v. WILLIAM LANGLEY and V. M. DORSETT, Trading as D & L DRIVE-IN AND CITY TAXI.

(Filed 13 October, 1954.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *Hubbard, Special Judge,*August 1954 Term of Chatham.

Civil action to recover damages for personal injuries from both defendants on the alleged grounds that plaintiff’s injuries were caused by the alleged actionable negligence of the defendant William Langley in the operation of an automobile, and from the defendant Y. M. Dorsett upon the alleged ground that the defendants were engaged in the business of operating a place of business known as the D & L Drive-In and a taxi service to the general public in the Town of Siler City, known as City Taxi, and that the defendant Langley, while operating one of the taxis of Dorsett and Langley, struck the plaintiff with the taxi injuring him.

*763At the close of plaintiff’s evidence, the defendant Y. M. Dorsett moved for judgment of nonsuit, which the court allowed, and the plaintiff excepted.

Appropriate issues were submitted to the jury as to the defendant William Langley, and were answered in favor of the plaintiff — the issue of damages being answered $28,000.00. Judgment was entered in accord with the verdict.

The plaintiff alone appeals. His sole assignment of error is that the lower court erred in signing judgment of nonsuit as to his cause of action against the defendant Y. M. Dorsett.

*Seawell & Wilson*

*By: S. F. Seawell, Jr., for Plaintiff, Appellant.*

*Claude Bittle for Defendant, Appellee.*

Pee, CuRiam.

*We*have carefully studied the evidence in the Eecord, considering it in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, and giving him the benefit of every inference which the evidence fairly supports. A serious question arises as to whether the plaintiff has alleged a partnership between the defendants. Conceding, but not deciding that he has, we are of opinion, and so hold, that the evidence totally fails to make out a case to be submitted to the jury as against the defendant Y. M. Dorsett. The ruling of the lower court nonsuiting plaintiff’s cause of action against Y. M. Dorsett was correct, and is

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 104 (Tuesday, June 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30385-30386]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12999]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID: DOD-2010-OS-0034]


Defense Transportation Regulation, Part IV

AGENCY: United States Transportation Command (USTRANSCOM), DoD.

ACTION: Notice; extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: DoD extends the public comment period of a notice concerning 
the Defense Personal Property Program (DP3) Phase III Final-Draft 
Business Rules. DoD has received a request to extend the comment period 
beyond its current 60-day comment period. Upon considering this 
request, DoD extends the comment deadline for an additional 30 days: 
From June 1, 2010, to July 1, 2010. No further extensions will be 
considered due to the timelines associated with funding and programming 
future Phase III capabilities.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 1, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Do not submit comments directly to the point of contact 
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT or mail your comments to any 
address other than what is shown below. Doing so will delay the posting 
of the submission. Request comments be submitted in the identified 
matrix-format posted with the business rules. You may submit comments, 
identified by docket number and title, by any of the following methods:
    Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 
instructions for submitting comments.
    Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 1160 Defense 
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-1160.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and docket number for this Federal Register document. The general 
policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is 
to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet 
at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, 
including any personal identifiers or contact information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jim Teague, United States 
Transportation Command, TCJ5/4-PI, 508 Scott Drive, Scott Air Force 
Base, IL 62225-5357; (618) 229-1985.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A notice concerning the Defense Personal 
Property Program (DP3) Phase III Final-

[[Page 30386]]

Draft Business Rules was published on April 1, 2010 (75 FR 16445), with 
a comment period ending date of June 1, 2010. After receiving a request 
to extend the comment period, DoD has decided to extend it for an 
additional 30 days through July 1, 2010. No further extensions will be 
considered due to the timelines associated with funding and programming 
future Phase III capabilities.

    Dated: May 26, 2010.
Mitchell S. Bryman,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2010-12999 Filed 5-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5371 

To prohibit the use of Federal funds and the provision of technical assistance 

for the Heritage Partnership Program and National Heritage Areas. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 31, 2014 

Mr. SALMON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of Federal funds and the provision of 

technical assistance for the Heritage Partnership Program and National Heritage Areas. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FOR 

4 NATIONAL HERITAGE AREAS. 

5 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no Fed6 eral funds may be used and no Federal technical assist7 ance may be provided for the following: 

8 (1) The Heritage Partnership Program. 

9 (2) Any National Heritage Area. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
---

CONSENT OF THOMAS C. POOL

The undersigned hereby consents to: (i) the filing of the
written disclosure regarding (a) the technical report entitled Gas Hills
Uranium Project Freemont and Natrona Counties, Wyoming, USA dated July 31,
2012, (b) the technical report entitled Technical Report Update of Gas Hills
Uranium Project Freemont and Natrona Counties, Wyoming, USA dated March 22,
2013, (c) the technical report entitled Technical Report on the Arizona Strip
Uranium Project, Arizona, U.S.A. dated June 27, 2012 and (d) the technical
report entitled Technical Report on the Henry Mountains Complex Uranium
Property, Utah, U.S.A. dated June 27, 2012, in relation to, as applicable, (A)
the Form 40-F Annual Report for the period ended December 31, 2013, and any
amendments thereto (the Form 40-F), of Energy Fuels Inc. (the Company),
filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, (B) the
Companys Annual Information Form for the period ended December 31, 2013 (the
AIF) and (C) the Management Information Circular of the Company dated July 15,
2013, and the documents incorporated by reference therein (the Circular); and
(ii) the incorporation by reference of such disclosure into (a) the Companys
Form S-8 Registration Statement, being filed with the United States Securities
and Exchange Commission and any amendments thereto (the S-8), and (b) the
Companys Form F-10 Registration Statement, being filed with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission and any amendments thereto (the F-10).

I also consent to: (i) the use of my name in the AIF, the
Circular, the F-10 and the Form 40-F; (ii) the incorporation by reference of the
Form 40-F, and the AIF into the S-8; and (iii) the incorporation by reference of
the Form 40-F, the AIF and the Circular into the F-10.

/s/ Thomas C.
PoolThomas C. Pool, P.E.

Date:March 28, 2014

---
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), the undersigned sole director of S Wind-up Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. |  | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter year ended March 31, 2007, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the Periodic
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Periodic
Report and results of operations for the Company for periods covered by the Periodic Report.
| | -- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ IRV LICHTENWALDName:

Irv LichtenwaldTitle:

DirectorDated:

April 16, 2007


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to S Wind-up
Corporation (the Company) and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it relates, is not
deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB),
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 234 (Wednesday, December 6, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 62478]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-29678]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--The Blue Band Consortium

    Notice is hereby given that, on July 31, 1995, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. Sec. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), The Blue Band Consortium has 
filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General 
and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the 
parties and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the 
Act, the identities of the parties to the venture are: Advanced 
Technology Materials, Inc., Danbury, CT; American Crystal Technology, 
Inc., Dublin, OH; Boston University, Boston, MA; Hewlett Packard 
Company, Palo Alto, CA; SDL, Inc., San Jose, CA; The University of 
Texas at Austin, Austin, TX; and Xerox Corporation, Palo Alto, CA. The 
objective of the venture is the rapid commercialization of 
optoelectronic components operating in the green, blue and ultraviolet 
portion of the optical spectrum.
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 95-29678 Filed 12-5-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
1The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 99-1578WM

_____________

United States of America, *

 * On Appeal from the United

Appellee, * States District Court

 * for the Western District

v. * of Missouri.

 *

Aaron Coppenbarger, * [Not To Be Published]

 *

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: December 29, 1999

 Filed: January 18, 2000

___________

Before McMILLIAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Aaron Coppenbarger appeals from the final judgment entered in the District

Court1 upon his guilty plea to conspiring to manufacture methamphetamine, in violation

of 21 U.S.C. § 846. The District Court sentenced Coppenbarger to ten years and one

month imprisonment and five years supervised release. For reversal, Coppenbarger

argues the District Court erred in denying his motion seeking a substantial-assistance
-2-

downward departure. We grant the government’s motion to supplement the record on

appeal. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the judgment of the District Court.

First, the District Court did not err in refusing to grant the downward departure

sua sponte. See United States v. Wilkerson, 179 F.3d 1083, 1085 (8th Cir. 1999);

United States v. Kelly, 18 F.3d 612, 617 (8th Cir. 1994). Nor did the District Court err

in not compelling the government to file a substantial-assistance departure motion in

the absence of a substantial threshold showing that the government’s refusal to file the

motion was in bad faith, irrational, or based on an unconstitutional motive. See

Wilkerson, 179 F.3d at 1086. Coppenbarger’s bare allegations that he provided

substantial assistance did not make the required showing. See Wade v. United States,

504 U.S. 181, 186 (1992). Finally, the District Court did not improperly rely on the

possibility that the government would in the future file a motion for reduction of

sentence under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b), as Coppenbarger failed to

demonstrate any right to a substantial-assistance motion at sentencing. See United

States v. Licona-Lopez, 163 F.3d 1040, 1043 (8th Cir. 1998).

Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### BOYD SAMUELS v. D. W. BOWERS, t/a D. W. BOWERS LUMBER COMPANY.

(Filed 18 October, 1950.)

Appeal and Error § 43—

A petition to rebear will be dismissed where the members of the Supreme Court are equally divided in opinion, one Justice having died since the petition was filed.

PetitioN by defendant Bowers to rehear this case, reported *ante,*149.

*Hubert E. Olive and W. II. Steed for respondent.*

*Don A. Walser for petitioner.*

Pee Cuiham.

*Justice Sea-well*having died since the petition to rehear was filed, and the remaining members of the Court being equally divided in opinion, the petition to rehear is dismissed. The case as reported will remain the law of the case but does not constitute a precedent.

Petition dismissed.
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of LDK Solar Co., Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31,
2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Xiaofeng Peng, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 15, 2012



By:

/s/ Xiaofeng PengXiaofeng PengChairman and Chief Executive Officer