alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit H

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4688-10 Filed: 11/12/19 Entered: 11/12/19 16:05:12 Page 1

of 2
STATION FORMAT

Chico

KCEZ-FM Contemporary Hit Radio

KHSL-FM Country

KPAY-AM News/Talk

KRQR-FM Album Oriented Rock

Redding

KEWB-FM Contemporary Hit Radio

KNCQ-FM Country

KQMS-AM News/Talk

KRDG-FM Classic Hits

San Francisco

KCBS-AM News

KISQ-FM Soft Adult Contemporary

KOIT-FM Adult Contemporary

KSAN-FM Classic Rock

Sacramento

KFBK-AM News/Talk

KNCI-FM Country

KRXQ-FM Album Oriented Rock

KSEG-FM Classic Rock

Stockton

KATM-FM Country

KHKK-FM Classic Hits

KJOY-FM Adult Contemporary

KWIN-FM Country Hit Radio

Modesto

KATM-FM Country

KFIV-AM News/Talk

KWNN-FM Contemporary Hit Radio

KJSN-FM Soft Adult Contemporary

STATION FORMAT

Chico

KRCX-FM Mexican Regional

KVMX-FM Mexican Regional

Redding

San Francisco 

KBRG-FM Spanish Adult Hits

KSOL-FM Mexican Regional

Sacramento

KXSE-FM Mexican Regional

KRCX-FM Mexican Regional

Stockton

KTSE-FM Mexican Regional

KTSE-FM Mexican Regional

Modesto

KMIX-FM Mexican Regional

KTSE-FM Mexican Regional

Radio MSA Spanish

Radio MSA English

No local Spanish stations

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4688-10 Filed: 11/12/19 Entered: 11/12/19 16:05:12 Page 2

of 2
Exhibit32.1

Certification Pursuant To Section 906 Of TheSarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. Section1350(A) And (B))

Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1350(a)and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as anofficer of Metaldyne Corporation (the"Company") that the Quarterly Report of theCompany on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 28, 2004 fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company at the end of and for the periodscovered by such Report.

|                        |  |                                                                     |  |  |  |  |
|------------------------|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|
| Date:November 10, 2004 |  | /s/ Timothy D.Leuliette Timothy D. Leuliette Chief ExecutiveOfficer |
|                        |

----
Exhibit 35.2

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (Item 1123)

GMAC Mortgage, LLC

RALI Series 2007-QA1 Trust (the Issuing Entity)

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of GMAC Mortgage, LLC, as servicer (the Servicer) pursuant to the applicable servicing agreement, does hereby certify that:

1. A review of the Servicers activities during the period covered by the Issuing Entitys report on Form 10-K and of the Servicers performance
under the applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 24th day of March 2008.



|       |  |                         
|------ |  | ------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Anthony N. Renzi    
|Name:  |  | Anthony N. Renzi        
|Title: |  | Executive Vice President
|   | /s/ Ronald H. Friesen                                             |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Ronald H. Friesen                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|   | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|   | (principal financial officer)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | May 13, 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF 

ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE

Martin J. Bienenstock, whose business address and telephone number is Proskauer Rose, 

LLP, Eleven Times Square, New York, New York 10036-8299, Telephone (212) 969-3000 and 

who is an active member in good standing of the bar of the State of New York, having applied in 

the above-entitled action for admission to practice in the Northern District of California on a pro 

hac vice basis, representing the Ad Hoc Group of Institutional Bondholders of Pacific Gas and 

Electric Co.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application is granted, subject to the terms and

conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate appearance pro hac

vice. Service of papers upon and communication with co-counsel designated in the application will 

constitute notice to the represented party. All future filings in this action are subject to the

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION,

Debtor.

Tax I.D. No. 94-3234914

Case Nos. 19-30088 (DM)

 19-30089 (DM)

Chapter 11

In re:

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY,

Debtor.

Tax I.D. No. 94-0742640

Signed and Filed: February 15, 2019

________________________________________

DENNIS MONTALI

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

Entered on Docket 

February 15, 2019

EDWARD J. EMMONS, CLERK 

U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 464 Filed: 02/15/19 Entered: 02/15/19 15:34:20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

2

Bankruptcy Local Rules and Electronic Case Filing Procedures adopted by the United States

Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California.

Dated: ____________________________

Dennis Montali

United States Bankruptcy Judge

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 464 Filed: 02/15/19 Entered: 02/15/19 15:34:20 Page 2 of 2
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 1, 2016

No. 04-15-00488-CV

CITY OF LEON VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP.,

Appellant

v.

Larry LITTLE,

Appellee

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-CI-17823

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Unopposed First Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief is 

GRANTED. The appellant’s reply brief is due on June 20, 2016. 

_________________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 1st day of June, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT H

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4486-8 Filed: 10/25/19 Entered: 10/25/19 20:22:43 Page 1

of 3
26 Feb, 2018 | 08:27

S&PdowngradesPG&E

overCalif.wildfirerisks



Author

Theme

S&PGlobal Ratings on Feb.22 downgraded PG&E Corp.and subsidiary

Pacific Gas and Electric Co.'s issuer creditratings to BBB+ from A- overthe

risk posed by last year's wildfires atits Northern California service territory.

The downgrade reflects the "management's inability to manage this

outsized risk well enough to preserve ratings in the 'A' category," S&PGlobal

Ratings said.The companies'ratings were placed on CreditWatch negative

in December 2017,following their announcementto suspend dividend

payments.

The ratings are still under watch for possible further downgrades.

According to the ratings agency,the PG&E management did not clarify on

when and whetherit willreinstate the dividend,which was suspended due

to uncertainty on wildfire liabilities.The wildfires resulted to 44 deaths and

damaged about 9,000 homes and businesses.



Nephele Kirong

Energy

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4486-8 Filed: 10/25/19 Entered: 10/25/19 20:22:43 Page 2

of 3
During the recent earnings call,CEO and President Geisha Williams said the

company is continuing its fight against California's application ofinverse

condemnation,calling it "the biggestfactor underlying the current

uncertainty." Inverse condemnation allows utilities to be liable for wildfire

damages caused by their equipment even without negligence.

But S&PGlobal Ratings noted thatthe company did not offer new

information on the potential wildfire exposure amountthat would keep the

dividend suspended. "[W]e no longer believe thatthe company's risk

management capabilities are consistent with the priorratings,and its

inability to understand and quantify and therefore adequately manage the

wildfire risks has weakened its credit profile," S&PGlobal Ratings added.

This downgrade also prompted the agency to place Topaz Solar Farms LLC

on CreditWatch negative on Feb.23.

Topaz Solar Farm is a 550-MW facility owned indirectly by Berkshire

Hathaway Energy.Itreceives allrevenues from Pacific Gas and Electric

under a long-term power purchase agreement.

S&PGlobal Ratings said anything more than a one-notch drop on the

ratings of PG&E,the critical counterparty,would also trigger a drop on the

current BBB senior secured ratings of Topaz Solar.

S&PGlobal Ratings and S&PGlobal MarketIntelligence are owned by S&P

Global Inc.

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4486-8 Filed: 10/25/19 Entered: 10/25/19 20:22:43 Page 3

of 3
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-20045 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

IRENE WILSON GLAZE, also known as Irene Flakes, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-92-CR-59

August 21, 1997 Before WISDOM, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Irene Wilson Glaze, federal prisoner #59783-079, appeals the district court’s denial of her motion to modify her sentence under
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) and other statutes. Glaze also appeals the denial of her motions for return of forfeited property, discovery,

an evidentiary hearing, a nd appointment of counsel. We have2

carefully reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties. We
AFFIRM. None of the authorities cited by Glaze in the district court authorized that court to grant the relief she sought. The district
court did not err by denying relief without ordering di scovery, appointing counsel, or holding an evidentiary hearing. Glaze has abandoned her challenge to the denial of her motion for return of forfeited property by failing to address that i ssue in her appellate brief. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 223-24 (5th Cir. 1993). Glaze’s motions in this court for appointment of appellate counsel and a default judgment are DENIED.
Glaze has filed documents which indicate that she also wishes to appeal the district court’s denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255; however, that appeal is not before this court. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a).
AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with this Annual Report of TransAct Energy Corp.. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Henry Andrews, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/ Henry Andrews Henry Andrews Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  March 24, 2009
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOTICE PARTIES

PG&E Corporation

c/o Pacific Gas & Electric Company

Attn: Janet Loduca, Esq.

77 Beale Street

P.O. Box 770000

San Francisco, CA 94105

Keller & Benvenutti LLP

Attn: Tobias S. Keller, Esq.

Jane Kim, Esq.

650 California Street, Suite 1900

San Francisco, CA 94108

The Office of the United States Trustee for Region 17

Attn: James L. Snyder, Esq.

Timothy Laffredi, Esq.

450 Golden Gate Avenue, 5th Floor, Suite #05-0153

San Francisco, CA 94102

Milbank LLP

Attn: Dennis F. Dunne, Esq.

Sam A. Khalil, Esq.

55 Hudson Yards

New York, NY 10001-2163

Milbank LLP

Attn: Paul S. Aronzon, Esq.

Gregory A. Bray, Esq.

Thomas R. Kreller, Esq.

2029 Century Park East, 33rd Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90067

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP

Attn: Stephen Karotkin, Esq.

 Jessica Liou, Esq.

 Matthew Goren, Esq.

767 Fifth Avenue

New York, NY 10153-0119 

Bruce A. Markell

Fee Examiner

541 N. Fairbanks Court

Suite 2200

Chicago, IL 60611-3710

Scott H. McNutt

Attorney for the Fee Examiner

324 Warren Road

San Mateo, CA 94402

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4440-6 Filed: 10/23/19 Entered: 10/23/19 17:11:59 Page 1

of 1
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

#71010010_v1 1 

NOTICE OF MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM THE AUTOMATIC STAY NO. 19-30089 (DM) 

HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP 

Thomas D. Leland (pro hac vice) 

Leah E. Capritta (pro hac vice) 

1801 California Street, Suite 5000 

Denver, CO 80202 

Telephone: (303) 974-6660 

Facsimile: (303) 974-6659 

Email: thomas.leland@hklaw.com 

 leah.capritta@hklaw.com 

HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP 

Vince Farhat (SBN 183794) 

400 South Hope Street, 8th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90071 

Telephone: (213) 896-2400 

Facsimile: (213) 896-2450 

Email: vince.farhat@hklaw.com 

 

Attorneys for 

TIGER NATURAL GAS, INC. 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, 

 Debtor. 

)

)

)

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

CASE NO. 19-30089 (DM)

Chapter 11 

TIGER NATURAL GAS INC.’S NOTICE 

OF MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM THE 

AUTOMATIC STAY

Date: November 13, 2019 

Time: 10:00 AM 

Judge: Hon. Dennis Montali 

Ctrm: 17 

NOTICE OF MOTION 

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, on November 13, 2019, at 10:00 a.m., or as soon 

thereafter as the matter may be heard before the Honorable Dennis of United States Bankruptcy 

Court, Northern District of California located at 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4321 Filed: 10/18/19 Entered: 10/18/19 18:13:49 Page 1 of

3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

#71010010_v1 2 

NOTICE OF MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM THE AUTOMATIC STAY NO. 19-30089 (DM) 

California, 16th Floor, Courtroom 17, Tiger Natural Gas, Inc. (“Tiger”), will and hereby does 

move the Court for relief from the automatic stay. 

DATED: October 18, 2019 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP 

By: /s/ Leah E. Capritta 

 Leah E. Capritta 

 Attorneys for Tiger Natural Gas, Inc.

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4321 Filed: 10/18/19 Entered: 10/18/19 18:13:49 Page 2 of

3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

#71010010_v1 3 Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4321 Filed: 10/18/19 Entered: 10/18/19 18:13:49 Page 3 of NOTICE OF MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM THE AUTOMATIC STAY 3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4732 Filed: 11/14/19 Entered: 11/14/19 15:26:02 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4732 Filed: 11/14/19 Entered: 11/14/19 15:26:02 Page 2 of

2
Exhibit 10.7

AMENDMENT TO RETAINER AGREEMENT

BY AND BETWEEN PROTEONOMIX, INC. and JOEL PENSLEY 

This Amendment (the “Amendment”) is made as of this 11th day of February, 2009, to a retainer agreement executed on November 29, 2007, by and between National Stem Cell Holding, Inc. (“NSCH”) and Joel Pensley, Esq. (“Pensley”) (the “Retainer Agreement”), in order to reflect and memorialize changes which have been made to the Retainer Agreement. 

WHEREAS, since the execution of the Retainer Agreement, NSCH has changed its name to Proteonomix, Inc., and Proteonomix, Inc. is a Delaware corporation with offices at 187 Mill Lane, Mountainside, New Jersey 07092 (the “Company”); and Pensley has an address at 211 Schoolhouse Road, Norfolk, Connecticut 06058 (herein, the Company and Pensley are together referred to as the “Parties”); and

WHEREAS, the Retainer Agreement provides for compensation to Pensley for services rendered and to be rendered to the Company to be paid in the form of shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $.001 (the “Shares”); 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein set forth and as set forth in the Retainer Agreement, the Retainer Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

1.  Pensley has, as of the date of this Amendment, been issued a total of 480,000 Shares, for consideration as follows:

200,000 Shares for services rendered and to be rendered through the end of the term of the Retainer Agreement;

180,000 Shares for becoming a director of the Company; and

100,000 Shares which will vest upon the filing of an S-1 registration statement.

2.  To the extent that the above Share issuances conflict with the terms of the Retainer Agreement, this Amendment shall supersede those terms. 

3.  The remainder of the terms and conditions of the Retainer Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.




PROTEONOMIX, INC.

   /s/Joel Pensley  

By:    /s/Michael Cohen        

    Joel Pensley

     Michael Cohen, President
Advanced BioMedical Technologies Inc.-10ka





Exhibit 32.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Annual Report of Advanced BioMedical Technologies Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended October 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), I, Wang Hui, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Dated this 18th day of October, 2011./s/ Wang HuiWang Hui, Director and Chief Executive Officer
#### Daniel M. Anthony, Appellant, v. Lebbeus R. Crippen, Respondent.

Judgment modified, as indicated in the opinion or Haight, J., and as so modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. The judgment to be settled by Haight, J., unless agreed upon between the parties.
#### S. W. WORTHINGTON and KIRBY WOODARD, successors to the QUINN-McGOWAN FURNITURE COMPANY, v. GILMERS, Incorporated.

(Filed 16 September, 1925.)

Actions — Parties—Corporations—Receivers.

Where it appears in an action that the indebtedness sought to be recovered was claimed to be due a corporation, and that the suit was instituted by the individual stockholders, a judgment as of nonsuit is properly entered, though proceedings in dissolution of the corporation were being had, C. S., 1182, the proper party plaintiff! being the corporation or a receiver appointed therefor.

Appeal by plaintiffs from *Sinclair, J.,*at May Term, 1925, of "WilsoN.

Plaintiffs sued the defendant for certain moneys collected from common carriers on claims filed by the Quinn-McGrowan Furniture Company, a corporation. Prom a judgment as upon nonsuit, plaintiffs appealed.

The evidence tended to show that plaintiffs are the owners 'of all the capital stock of Quinn-McGowan Furniture Company, a corporation, and that proceedings were had on or about 20 September, 1920, to dissolve this corporation under C. S., 1182..

This action was instituted 21 June, 1923.

That certain properties were sold by Quinn-McGrowan Furniture Company to the defendant, as evidenced by bill of sale dated 2 August, 1920, and that these claims against two railroads for damages to furniture were not included in this sale, but that defendant did, after 2 August, 1920, and before 21 June, 1923, collect these claims in the sum of $1,885.62.

*129The plaintiffs’ evidence further tended to show that these claims were due to the Quinn-McGowan Furniture Company.

To the exclusion of the evidence of the witness Meares, .that the account receivable, as shown on the current ledger, and the sale to Gilmers, did not include any item of freight claims, on the grounds that the bill of sale and books therein referred to were the best evidence, and to the nonsuit, plaintiffs excepted and appealed.

*S. G. Mewbom for plaintiffs.*

*Woodard & Rand and Connor & HilJ, for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

There was no notice given to produce the books, and their loss was not proved. They were not collateral, but are clearly within the rule announced in *Ivey v. Cotton Mills,*143 N. C., 189; *Murchison v. McLeod,*47 N. C., 239; *Mahoney v. Osborne,*189 N. C., 445.

The freight claims were filed by the Quinn-McGowan Furniture Company, a corporation, in its name, and not in the names of its stockholders. There is no claim that the corporation ever transferred them to the plaintiffs. The corporation, after the dissolution proceedings, remained in existence three years. 0. S., 1193.

The stockholders cannot maintain this action in their' individual capacity upon the allegations in this complaint. *We*view the evidence in its most favorable light for plaintiffs on a motion to nonsuit, but this rule cannot supply the proper plaintiff.

The corporation itself, or a receiver thereof, is the proper party to sue for its property. *Moore v. Mining Co.,*104 N. C., 534; *Merrimon v. Paving Co.,*142 N. C., 539; *Hawes v. Oakland,*104 U. S., 450.

The iudgment appealed from is

Affirmed.