alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 105 (Wednesday, June 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 30899]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13260]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Notice of a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) and Record 
of Decision (ROD) on a Final Environmental Assessment (FEA) for the 
Proposed Federal Action at the Macon County Airport, Franklin, NC

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
approval of a FONSI/ROD on an FEA for a proposed Federal action at the 
Macon County Airport, Franklin, NC. The FONSI/ROD states that the 
proposed projects are consistent with the National Environmental Policy 
Act of 1969 and will not significantly affect the quality of the 
environment.
    The FEA evaluated Macon County Airport's proposal to extend Runway 
7/25 600 feet to a total length of 5,000 feet, extend the existing 
parallel taxiway, and construct a 300-foot runway safety area.
    After reviewing the FEA, the FAA has determined that project would 
not significantly affect the quality of the human environment. 
Therefore, the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) 
is not required.
    The FEA and the FONSI/ROD are available for review at:

FAA Southern Region, Atlanta Airports District Office, 1701 Columbia 
Avenue, Suite 2-260, College Park, GA 30337.
Macon County Courthouse, Tax Collector's Office, 5 West Main Street, 
Annex Bldg., Franklin, NC 28734-3005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Parks Preston, Federal Aviation 
Administration, Atlanta Airports District Office, 1701 Columbia Ave., 
Campus Bldg., Suite 2-260, College Park, GA 30337. 404-305-7149.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia on May 19, 2010.
Scott L. Seritt,
Manager, Atlanta Airports District Office.
[FR Doc. 2010-13260 Filed 6-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
EXHIBIT 31.1

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(D)/15D-14(D)
                    UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Anthony N. Renzi, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  report  on Form  10-K and all  reports  on Form  10-D
   required to be filed in respect of the period  covered by this report on Form
   10-K of RFMSI Series 2007-S1 Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2. Based on my knowledge,  the Exchange Act periodic reports,  taken as a whole,
   do not contain  any untrue  statement  of a material  fact or omit to state a
   material  fact  necessary  to make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of the
   circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not  misleading  with
   respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based  on  my  knowledge,  all  of  the  distribution,  servicing  and  other
   information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
   this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities  performed by the servicers and
   based on my knowledge and the compliance  reviews  conducted in preparing the
   servicer  compliance  statements  required in this report  under Item 1123 of
   Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic  reports,
   the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements
   in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance  with  servicing  criteria for
   asset-backed  securities and their related  attestation reports on assessment
   of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to
   be included in this report in accordance  with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
   Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
   report,  except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
   of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report
   on Form 10-K.

In giving the  certifications  above,  I have  reasonably  relied on information
provided  to me by  the  following  unaffiliated  parties:  U.S.  Bank  National
Association.

Date:  March 24, 2008


By:     /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
Name:   Anthony N. Renzi
Title:  Managing Director
(senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4840-4592-8620.1

EXHIBIT F

Transmittal Letter

Dundon Advisers LLC

440 Mamaroneck Avenue, Suite 507, Harrison NY 10528

November 8, 2019

Ms. Karen Lockhart

Chair, Official Committee of Tort Claimants 

Pacific Gas and Electric Co. and PG&E Corp 

Klockhart1492@gmail.com 

Re: In re: PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company – Case No. 19-30088

Dear Ms. Lockhart:

Enclosed please find our firm’s first interim fee application in the above-captioned cases, along 

with its exhibits and supporting certification. The Bankruptcy Court’s Guidelines for 

Compensation and Expense Reimbursement of Professionals and Trustees provides that a debtorin-possession, a trustee, or an official committee must exercise reasonable business judgement in 

monitoring the fees and expenses of the estates’ professionals. I invite you to discuss with me any 

objections, concerns or questions that you may have with the firm’s fee request. The Office of the 

United States Trustee will also accept your comments. The Court will consider timely-filed 

objections by any party in interest at the time of hearing, which will take place at a time to be 

announced shortly.

Sincerely,

/s/ Matthew Dundon 

Matthew Dundon 

Principal

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4727-6 Filed: 11/14/19 Entered: 11/14/19 14:32:47 Page 1

of 1
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4347 Filed: 10/21/19 Entered: 10/21/19 13:26:20 Page 1 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4347 Filed: 10/21/19 Entered: 10/21/19 13:26:20 Page 2 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4347 Filed: 10/21/19 Entered: 10/21/19 13:26:20 Page 3 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4347 Filed: 10/21/19 Entered: 10/21/19 13:26:20 Page 4 of

4
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                             563
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,863
<ALLOWANCES>                                       123
<INVENTORY>                                      3,971
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,124
<PP&E>                                           7,811
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,710
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,301
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,095
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           748
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,768
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,301
<SALES>                                         14,535
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,535
<CGS>                                           10,420
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,420
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 174
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    235
<INCOME-TAX>                                         7
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                228
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       228
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .28
        



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from JMC Group,
Inc's Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such 10-Q
filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000746425
<NAME> JMC GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                            4420
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      982
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  7841
<PP&E>                                            1674
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1447
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    8798
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2710
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               60
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        6028
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      8798
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1206
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1618
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (412)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (161)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (251)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (251)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)
        


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7566

THOMAS A. CHILTON, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

ALTON BASKERVILLE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate

Judge. (CA-03-904-3)

Submitted: March 2, 2005 Decided: March 17, 2005

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas A. Chilton, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John H. McLees, Jr.,

Donald Eldridge Jeffrey, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*

The parties consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by a

magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1).

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Thomas A. Chilton, Jr., seeks to appeal the magistrate

judge’s order* denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in

a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Chilton has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4788-4    Filed: 11/18/19    Entered: 11/18/19 11:04:36    Page 1of 2

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4788-4    Filed: 11/18/19    Entered: 11/18/19 11:04:36    Page 2of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153-0119

EXHIBIT 1-M

Legal Observation Support Services

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-14 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page 1

of 14
REDACTED VERSION OF THE PROPOSED REDACTED DOCUMENT

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-14 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page 2

of 14
Sarah Nolton

Principal

7/2/2019

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-14 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page 3

of 14
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-14 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page 4

of 14
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-14 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page 5

of 14
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-14 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page 6

of 14
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-14 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page 7

of 14
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-14 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page 8

of 14
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-14 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page 9

of 14
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-14 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page

10 of 14
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-14 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page

11 of 14
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-14 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page

12 of 14
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-14 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page

13 of 14
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-14 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page

14 of 14
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 443    Filed: 02/14/19    Entered: 02/14/19 06:39:17    Page 1 of 3

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 443    Filed: 02/14/19    Entered: 02/14/19 06:39:17    Page 2 of 3

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 443    Filed: 02/14/19    Entered: 02/14/19 06:39:17    Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 10.1


Form of Indemnity Agreement


[Date]


[Indemnitee
Name]

[Address]
Dear [_____________],



          Reference
is hereby made to Article VII of the bylaws of Sotheby’s (the “Company”) as in
effect as of the date hereof (the “Company Indemnity Bylaws”). In consideration
of your prior and continuing service to the Company and in order to eliminate
any ambiguity in the event of any purported amendment, modification, alteration
or repeal of the Company Indemnity Bylaws that might otherwise diminish, limit,
restrict, adversely affect or eliminate any of your rights to indemnification,
advancement of expenses or otherwise under the Company Indemnity Bylaws, this
will confirm that any such purported amendment, modification, alteration or
repeal shall be prospective only and shall not in any way diminish, limit,
restrict, adversely affect or eliminate any such right with respect to any
actual or alleged state of facts, occurrence, action or omission then or
previously existing, or any action, suit or proceeding previously or thereafter
brought or threatened based in whole or in part upon any such actual or alleged
state of facts, occurrence, action or omission. The Company hereby agrees that
your rights under the Company Indemnity Bylaws are contract rights that shall
be incorporated into this letter agreement and shall continue, without
amendment or repeal, even in the event that you cease your association with the
Company and that such rights shall be for your benefit and for the benefit of
your heirs, executors and administrators. This letter agreement may not be
amended or modified except by an instrument in writing signed by both parties
hereto. 


          This
letter agreement shall be governed by Delaware law.


          If
you agree with the foregoing, please acknowledge by executing a copy of this
letter and returning it to the Company.


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
Very truly
 yours,


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
Sotheby’s


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
By:

	
 


	
 

	
 

	



	
 

	
 

	
Name:


	
 

	
 

	
Title:


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
Accepted and
 Agreed to:

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 


	


	
 


	
Name:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BAKER 

&

HOSTETLER LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

Robert A. Julian (SBN 88469)

Cecily A. Dumas (SBN 111449)

BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP

1160 Battery Street, Suite 100

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: 628.208.6434

Facsimile: 310.820.8859

Email: rjulian@bakerlaw.com

Email: cdumas@bakerlaw.com

Eric E. Sagerman (SBN 155496)

Lauren T. Attard (SBN 320898)

BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP

11601 Wilshire Boulevard

Suite 1400

Los Angeles, CA 90025

Telephone: 310.820.8800

Facsimile: 310.820.8859

Email: esagerman@bakerlaw.com

Email: lattard@bakerlaw.com

Counsel for Official Committee of Tort Claimants

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION

-andPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY,

Debtors.

□ Affects PG&E Corporation

□ Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company

■ Affects both Debtors

*All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case, 

No. 19-30088 (DM)

Bankruptcy Case 

No. 19-30088 (DM)

Chapter 11

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION 

FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO 

HAC VICE – JOSEPH M. ESMONT

Signed and Filed: August 7, 2019

________________________________________

DENNIS MONTALI

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

Entered on Docket 

August 07, 2019

EDWARD J. EMMONS, CLERK 

U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3438 Filed: 08/07/19 Entered: 08/07/19 16:18:38 Page 1 of

2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BAKER 

&

HOSTETLER LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

CLEVELAND

- 2 -

Joseph M. Esmont, whose business address and telephone number is Baker & Hostetler LLP, 

127 Public Square, Key Tower, Suite 2000, Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1214, (216) 621-0200, and who 

is an active member in good standing of the bar of the State of Ohio, the United States District 

Courts for the Northern District of Ohio and the Southern District of Ohio, and having applied in 

the above-entitled action for admission to practice in the Northern District of California on a pro 

hac vice basis, representing the Official Committee of Tort Claimants.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application is granted, subject to the terms and 

conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate appearance pro hac 

vice. Service of papers upon and communication with co-counsel designated in the application will 

constitute notice to the represented party. All future filings in this action are subject to the 

Bankruptcy Local Rules and Electronic Case Filing Procedures adopted by the United States 

Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California.

** END OF ORDER **

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3438 Filed: 08/07/19 Entered: 08/07/19 16:18:38 Page 2 of

2
#### Karl Ivanovitch Mejulis and Mary Beaudrie, as Their Interests May Appear, Plaintiffs, *v.*First Russian Insurance Company, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

October 30, 1936.

*716
      *John M. Downes,*for the Superintendent of Insurance of the State.of New York, for the motion.

*Emanuel Thebner,*for the receiver.

*Benjamin Pulier,*for the plaintiffs, opposed.

Frankenthaler, J.

Motion to vacate is granted. Section 977-b of the Civil Practice Act, in the court’s opinion, was not intended to and does not apply to corporations presently in liquidation by the Superintendent of Insurance under and pursuant to the provisions of the Insurance Law. Settle order.
Exhibit 99.2







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pawnbroker.com, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William Galine, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









/s/ William Galine



William Galine

Acting Chief Financial Officer

November 14,2002
Exhibit 4.2





STANDBY
EQUITY DISTRIBUTION


 


AMENDMENT
AGREEMENT


 


This
amendment agreement dated as of June 9, 2016 (the “Amendment Agreement”) is between YA II PN, LTD. (formerly YA
GLOBAL MASTER SPV LTD.), a Cayman Islands exempt limited partnership (the “Investor”), and B.O.S. Better Online
Solutions LTD., a company organized under the laws of the State of Israel (the “Company”). Each of the Investor
and the Company are sometimes referred to herein as a “Party” or collectively as the “Parties”.


 


This
Amendment Agreement is an amendment to that certain agreement between the Parties dated as of February 17, 2015 (the “2015
SEDA Agreement”). All capitalized terms in this Amendment Agreement shall, unless otherwise indicated herein, have the meanings
assigned to them in the 2015 SEDA Agreement.


 


The
Parties hereby agree as follows:


 


		1)	As
                                         a result of a name change by the Investor the Investor shall be referred to as YA II
                                         PN, LTD. in all instances for purposes of the 2015 SEDA Agreement. 



 


		2)	Section
                                         1.30 (definition of the “Pricing Period”) shall be deleted in its entirety
                                         and replaced with the following:



 


Section
1.30“Pricing Period” shall mean the 3 consecutive Trading Days after the Advance Notice Date.


 


		3)	The
                                         references to 20% in Section 2.01(b)(i) and Section 2.01(b)(ii) (“Minimum Acceptable
                                         Price”) shall be replaced with references to 33.3%. 



 


		4)	All
                                         other terms and conditions of the 2015 SEDA Agreement remain in full force and effect.



 


[REMAINDER
OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]


 






     

     

    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment Agreement as of the date first above written.


 





	 	COMPANY:
	 	 
	 	B.O.S.
    Better Online Solutions LTD. 
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    Eyal Cohen
	 	Name:	Eyal
    Cohan
	 	Title:	Chief
    Financial Officer
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    Yuval Viner
	 	Name:	Yuval
    Viner
	 	Title:	Chief
    Executive Officer
	 	 	 
	 	INVESTOR:
	 	 
	 	YA
    II PN, LTD.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	Yorkville
    Advisors Global, LP
	 	Its:	Investment
    Manager
	 	 	 	 
	 	By:
    	Yorkville
    Advisors Global, LLC
	 	Its:
    	General
    Partner
	 	 	 	 
	 	By:
    	/s/
    Matt Beckman
	 	Name:
    	Matt
    Beckman
	 	Title:	Partner