alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Signed and Filed: October 23, 2019

________________________________________

DENNIS MONTALI

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

Entered on Docket 

October 23, 2019

EDWARD J. EMMONS, CLERK 

U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4434 Filed: 10/23/19 Entered: 10/23/19 15:40:43 Page 1 of

2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SCHEDULE 1 

Anchorage Capital Group, L.L.C., 

on behalf of certain funds and accounts 

610 Broadway, 6th Floor 

New York, NY 10012 

Centerbridge Partners, L.P., 

on behalf of certain funds and accounts 

375 Park Avenue, 11th Floor 

New York, NY 10152 

Fidelity Management & Research Company, 

on behalf of certain funds and accounts 

245 Summer Street 

Boston, MA 02210 

Silver Point Capital, L.P., 

on behalf of certain funds and accounts 

Two Greenwich Plaza 

Greenwich, CT 06830 

SteelMill Master Fund LP 

c/o PointState Capital LP 

40 West 57th Street, 25th Floor 

New York, NY 10019 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4434 Filed: 10/23/19 Entered: 10/23/19 15:40:43 Page 2 of

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001011701
<NAME> RIFKIN ACQUISITION CAPITAL CORP
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,325
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,932
<ALLOWANCES>                                       445
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         156,799
<DEPRECIATION>                                  35,227
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 317,304
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                        224,575
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      92,729
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   317,304
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                89,921
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   85,444
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (39,426)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,662
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,241
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,178)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             24,419
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,419
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>The amount shown for current assets and current liabilities is
zero due to an unclassified balance sheet in the financial
statements.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**Certification**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002**

**(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,United States Code)**

 

Pursuantto section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofsection 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of theundersigned does hereby certify that:

 

TheForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the “Form 10-Q”) of theCompany fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
|                   | /s/ David R. Carlucci                             |   |
|------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date: November 2, 2007 | David R. Carlucci                                 |
|                   | Chairman, Chief  Executive Officer and  President |

 

 
|                   | /s/ Leslye G. Katz                                  |   |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date: November 2, 2007 | Leslye G. Katz                                      |
|                   | Senior Vice President  and Chief Financial  Officer |

 

 

Theforegoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed aspart of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to IMS HealthIncorporated and will be retained by IMS Health Incorporated and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 27, 2013

p0924

Order 

Clerk

September 27, 2013

146763

HEATHER LYNN HANNAY,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146763

COA: 307616

Court of Claims: 09-000116-MZ

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 17, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED, limited to the 

issues: (1) whether economic loss in the form of wage loss may qualify as a “bodily 

injury” that permits a plaintiff to avoid the application of governmental immunity from 

tort liability under the motor vehicle exception to governmental immunity, 

MCL 691.1405 (see Wesche v Mecosta Co Rd Comm, 480 Mich 75 (2008)); and (2) 

whether the evidence in this case establishes that the plaintiff incurred a loss of income 

from work that she would have performed as opposed to a loss of earning capacity. 

The Michigan Association for Justice, the Michigan Defense Trial Counsel, Inc., 

and the Insurance Institute of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other 

persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may 

move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6848** 

ANTHONY MICHELLE KING , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. SUPERINTENDENT BRAD PERITT , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 5:13

- h c - 02267

- BO )

Submitted : August 21 , 2014 Decided: August 26, 2014

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Anthony Michelle King, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Anthony Michelle King seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petit ion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional rig ht.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the den ial of a con stitutional right. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484

- 85 (2000)
. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that King has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of MidSouth Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 (the “Report”), I, James R. McLemore, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ James R. McLemore


James R. McLemore


Chief Financial Officer


November 9, 2010
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.12



February 25, 1997                                              AMENDED 4-16-97



Mr. Al Turner
181 Silver Beech Road
Southbury, CT  06488

Dear Al:

This will confirm the offer of employment for the position of Director of
Information Systems.  The offer is effective March 1, 1997.

Following is a synopsis of the details we discussed:

BASE SALARY:            $10,425/month to be reviewed in six (6) months

BONUS:                  A sign-on bonus of one month's salary

INCENTIVE BONUS:        Eligibility under the Rubatex annual incentive plan
                        for 1997.

RETIREMENT:             Eligibility under the Rubatex Pension Plan and 401(k)
                        Savings Plan.

VACATION:               Two (2) weeks vacation in 1997; four (4) weeks each
                        year thereafter.

HEALTH/LIFE/LTD:        Per Rubatex Plans - See attached.  (90-day waiting
                        period waived).
<PAGE>

Page 2
Al Turner
February 25, 1997


RELOCATION:             See Attached
                        In addition:
                            * Expenses grossed up for income tax impact.
                            * Temporary living duration by mutual agreement.

SEVERANCE:              If your employment is terminated by the Company for
                        any reason other than cause during the first three (3)
                        years of your employment, you will receive twelve (12)
                        months severance pay.

As we discussed, I will propose to the Board that you be named Vice President
of I. S. at the next scheduled board meeting.

If you have any questions, please let me know.  I am excited about you joining
our management team and know that you can make a major contribution.

Sincerely,



Frank H. Roland

FHR/lkb

Enc.


                                                      ------------------------
                                                            Accepted/Date
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Sim

pson

T

h

acher &

B

artlett L

L

P

425 Lexington

A

ve

New

York, N

Y 10

017

Exhibit D 

Budget for Fees Pursuant to Section 363 (Independent Director Representation) 

Period Fees Budgeted 

(Using Mid-Forecast) Fees Sought 

May 1 – May 31, 2019 $165,809.00 $317,536.50 

June 1 – June 30, 2019 $235,341.00 $270,021.50 

July 1 – July 31, 2019 $534,097.00 $310,834.50 

August 1 – August 31, 2019 763,000.00 $410,119.50 

Total: $1,698,247.00 $1,308,512.00 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4767-4 Filed: 11/15/19 Entered: 11/15/19 14:36:16 Page 1

of 1
A r a

1

r, " • aa a r . . • 

t

I! M, x . s

TEXAS BRINE COMPANY, LLC

μ d43udgment Rendered - MAY 19

2023 ON EL FROM

THE 23RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT CURT, 

DIVISION ASSUMPTION PARISH, 

LOUISIANA DOCKET NUMBER

4, Leopold Z. 

Sher James M. 

Garner Peter L. Hilbert, 

Jr. Christopher aa ..; T. 

aNew Orleans., 

rTravis J. 

Turner Gonzales, 

Louisiana

a Roy ' a et

ai Kent A. 

Lambert Adam B. 

Zuckerman

AdamsMatthew C. 

Juneau Lauren

Brink New Orleans., 

Louisiana a

a::! i
Letm

This dispute is one of many arising out of the August 3, 2012 sinkhole that

I p I I

lIill I I III I I 111 I I I M I III 1: 1121 WSTIZM-1 RUE

111111111, 1` 1

Mill

to the trial court. 

by the same trial court, on the same day, but in a different docket number, i.e., Twenty - 

I " 111111 111 111 1 , 11 C'lglp 0

1 1111; 

1111111:

111112 P1111111 FIRINIRII: ' I

Is! 1311111. laiIiiiiiiiii Irn 11; Illirll

I- . 

Ili I

III " I 1111HEI HIM ! 71111 0511 fl if ! IIII Ill ; I1111111

I'

ll IRII - I - 0. 481n.[MZ3 

w=

111pi f! riligrllpIlilill

M Kmzila lit 41 1 S

appealable judgment under La. C. C.P. art. 1915( B) and R.J. Messinger, Inc. v. 

I In

After a thorough review of the record, we find no material distinction between the

1111111 1 I I I I I I I

I 1111 p I I Ilip I I p Ili I I

art. 1915( B) and Messinger Therefore, we lack subject matter jurisdiction over this

I After Crosstex 0832 was decided, this court decided Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC v. Texas

Brine Company, LLC, 22- 1036 ( La. App. 1 Cir. 4/ 18/ 23), 5o.3d , 2023 WL 2985097 ( Florida Gas

1036), and again considered another identical judgment by the same trial court, on the same day, in a

third trial court docket number, i.e., Twenty -Third JDC Docket No. 34, 316. As did the CrosstexO832Court

before it, the Florida Gas 1036 Court dismissed Texas Brine's appeal. 

2
proceedings. We issue this summary disposition in accordance with Uniform Rules — 

ii I 51, 1171F j-- jq, 11 11 1171

k

FIT! 0 0

2 In light of this opinion and the parties' appearance at oral argument, we deny as moot Texas Brine' s

February 8, 2023 Motion to Remand Issues Presented by this Appeal and Cancel Oral Argument Due to

Improvident Granting of Article 1915( B) Certification, that was filed with this Court. 

9
Certifications

      I, Susan Mills, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
required to  be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form
10-K of Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-WFHE1 (the "Exchange Act periodic
reports");

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole,
do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to  make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in
this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the
Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its
obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be
included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report
on Form 10-K.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A..

Date: March 28, 2008

/s/ Susan Mills
----------------------
Susan Mills
Vice President
(Senior officer in charge of securitization of the Depositor)
**Exhibit 13.2**

 

**Certification by the Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of JA Solar Holdings Co., Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 30, 2012, and as amended by Amendment No. 1 on May 23, 2012, Amendment No. 2 on July 2, 2012 and Amendment No. 3 on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Min Cao, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)                                 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | October 15,   2012 |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |                    |   |
|   |                    |   |
| By:    | /s/ Min Cao             |   |
| Name:  | Min Cao                 |   |
| Title: | Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
#### MAT LEE ARMSTRONG v. HOME SERVICE STORES, Incorporated.

(Filed 28 September, 1932.)

Appeal and Error E a — Where necessary parts of record proper are not ’ sent up the appeal will be dismissed.

Tbe pleadings on wbicb tbe case is tried, tbe issues, and tbe judgment appealed from are necessary parts of tbe record proper, Rule 19(1), and where no statement of case on appeal bas been settled by agreement or otherwise and tbe record fails to contain tbe necessary parts and is too meager to authorize a determination of tbe question sought to be presented tbe appeal will be dismissed.

Appeal by H. Bryan Duffy from *Oranmer, J.,*at February Term, 1932, of CRAVEN.

Claim for preference apparently filed in a receivership proceeding, wbicb resulted in a denial of tbe claim, and claimant appeals.

*Charles L. Abernethy, Jr., for H. Bryan Duffy.*

*Gt. A. Barden for Carmichael, receiver.*

Stacy, C. J.

From an order made at the February Term, 1932, Craven Superior Court, notice of appeal was entered by “Plaintiff, H. Bryan Duffy,” who was allowed thirty days to make out and serve *232statement of ease on appeal, and “Defendant, Receiver,” given thirty days thereafter to prepare and file exceptions or conntercase. No statement of case on appeal has been settled by agreement or otherwise. The petition and answer upon which the claim was heard are not in the record. It is provided by Rule 19(1) that “the pleadings on which the ease is tried, the issues, and the judgment appealed from shall be a part of the transcript in all cases.” Failure to send up necessary parts of the record proper has uniformly resulted in dismissal of the appeal. *Riggan v. Harrison, ante,*191; *Everett v. Fair Association,*202 N. C., 838; *Pruitt v. Wood,*199 N. C., 788, 156 S. E., 126; *Waters v. Waters, ibid.,*667, 155 S. E., 564.

Appellant’s statement of case was served 3 September, long after time for serving it had expired. Time for filing exceptions or countercase has not yet expired, if appellant’s statement was served under agreement of extension or waiver.

It may be presumed perhaps that a proceeding, entitled as above, is pending in the Superior Court of Craven County, though this fact has not been made to appear in any accredited way, except by the clerk’s certificate. The record is too meager to authorize a determination of the question sought to be presented.

Appeal dismissed.
16213.101 4813-3072-1699.3 

EXHIBIT C 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4038-3 Filed: 09/30/19 Entered: 09/30/19 13:37:00 Page 1

of 2
16213.101 4813-3072-1699.3 Exhibit C 

EXPENSE SUMMARY (COBLENTZ PATCH DUFFY & BASS LLP) FOR THE PERIOD 

AUGUST 1, 2019 THROUGH AUGUST 31, 2019 

EXPENSES AMOUNTS 

Computerized Research N/A 

Meals N/A 

Travel N/A 

Transportation N/A

Duplicating N/A

Transcription (Deposition) Services $1,308.30 

Third Party Consulting Fees N/A 

Telephone Conferencing N/A 

Messenger N/A

Filing Fees N/A

Litigation Support Vendors N/A 

Court Website Subscription Fee for Case No. JCCP4974 $237.80

Total Expenses Requested: $1,546.10

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4038-3 Filed: 09/30/19 Entered: 09/30/19 13:37:00 Page 2

of 2
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH 

	NO. 2-08-414-CV

CARL GAVREL	APPELLANT	

	V.

MARK LIEBERMAN, KATHLEEN 						 APPELLEES

LIEBERMAN, AND GEORGE ONZO

	----------

	FROM THE 141ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered appellant’s “Motion To Dismiss Without Prejudice.”  It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss appellant’s appeal as against Kathleen Lieberman.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).  This case shall hereafter be styled “Carl Gavrel v. Mark Lieberman and George Onzo.”2

	As between appellant and Kathleen Lieberman, appellant shall bear the costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

	Appellant’s brief was filed on February 9, 2009.  The brief of appellee Mark Lieberman and George Onzo was filed on March 5, 2009.  Appellant shall file any reply brief on or before Wednesday, September 16, 2009.

	Furthermore, the court has considered “Plaintiff’s Motion For Leave To File Notice Of Appeal” and “Plaintiff’s Amended Notice Of Appeal” seeking to limit appellant’s challenges to the portions of the judgment entered in favor of Mark Lieberman and George Onzo.  In light of the court’s ruling above, leaving only Mark Lieberman and George Onzo as appellees in this appeal, plaintiff’s motion for leave and amended notice of appeal are moot.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL:  WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.  

DELIVERED:  August 27, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5157 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5157

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs to waive certain requirements relating to the approval 
  of programs of education for purposes of the educational assistance 
            programs of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 17, 2014

 Ms. Titus (for herself, Mr. Stewart, and Mr. Matheson) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs to waive certain requirements relating to the approval 
  of programs of education for purposes of the educational assistance 
            programs of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO THE APPROVAL OF 
              PROGRAMS OF EDUCATION FOR PURPOSES OF THE EDUCATIONAL 
              ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 
              AFFAIRS.

    Section 3680A of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(h) The Secretary may waive subsection (e) in the case of a 
program of education offered by an educational institution if the 
educational institution has been operating a program of education in 
another location for at least two years and such program of education 
is approved under this chapter.''.
                                 <all>
```