alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Notice Recipients

District/Off: 0971−3 User: dchambers Date Created: 12/6/2019

Case: 19−30088 Form ID: TRANSC Total: 9

Recipients of Notice of Electronic Filing:

aty Andrew Michael Leblanc ALeblanc@milbank.com

aty Gregory A. Bray gbray@milbank.com

aty Matthew A. Feldman mfeldman@willkie.com

aty Nancy Mitchell nmitchell@omm.com

aty Rebecca J. Winthrop rebecca.winthrop@nortonrosefulbright.com

aty Robert A. Julian rjulian@bakerlaw.com

TOTAL: 6

Recipients submitted to the Claims Agent (Prime Clerk):

aty Michael S. Stamer Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP One Bryant Park New York, NY 10036

aty Stephen Karotkin Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153

ABID QURESHI, ESQ. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP One Bryant Park New York, NY

10036

TOTAL: 3

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4992-3 Filed: 12/05/19 Entered: 12/05/19 10:22:14 Page 1

of 1
#### In the Matter of the Application of Rachel Friedman, Administratrix, etc., of Benjamin Friedman, Deceased, Petitioner, for a Mandamus Order against Michael McHugh, a Justice of the Municipal Court, Sitting in the Second District, Bronx, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Bronx County,

January 25, 1937.

*Louis Friedmann,*for the petitioner.

The return of the justice.

McLaughlin (Charles B.), J.

This is a motion to mandamus a justice of the Municipal Court who exercised his discretion under *857section 684 of the Civil Practice Act, in denying an application for an order authorizing the issuance of a garnishee execution. This court has examined the paper submitted to the justice of the Municipal Court. The affidavit is insufficient as the basis of any *ex parte*order. An order based upon it could not have been sustained if attacked. It clearly appears that the Municipal Court justice acted within the powers granted to him, and it was in his discretion to say whether the affidavit was satisfactory. Section 684 provides that the order must be signed upon *satisfactory proof*of the facts. The mere statement that a telephone call was made is insufficient in law as there is no proof as to recognition of the voice. *(Murphy*v. *Jack,*142 N. Y. 215; Richardson Evidence [5th ed.], § 524, subd. f.) In addition, the rule of procedure adopted by the justice was aimed to prevent a fraud upon the court and to avoid the abuses which would result, and which have occurred in the past, where a loose procedure was followed in the granting of orders for garnishee executions. The justice of the Municipal Court rightfully refused to sign the garnishee order. Moreover, the Municipal Court is a court of record and the action of the judge, even if this court did not approve the decision, would be subject to review only on appeal. Where there is a right to appeal, a mandamus order will not be granted *(Matter of Runk,*200 N. Y. 447, 452); nor will it be issued to review any decision involving the exercise of discretion on the part of a judge. *(People ex rel. Harris*v. *Commissioners,*149 N. Y. 26; *People*v. *Baker,*35 Barb. 105; see, also, Fiero Particular Actions and Proceedings [4th ed.], vol. 2, p. 1918.) The motion is denied.
EXHIBIT A-11 

Exhibit A-11 Page 307

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-12 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page 1

of 21
Exhibit 

Page 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-12 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page 2

of 21
Exhibit 

Page 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-12 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page 3

of 21
Exhibit 

Page 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-12 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page 4

of 21
Exhibit 

Page 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-12 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page 5

of 21
Exhibit 

Page 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-12 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page 6

of 21
Exhibit 

Page 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-12 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page 7

of 21
Exhibit 

Page 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-12 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page 8

of 21
Exhibit 

Page 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-12 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page 9

of 21
Exhibit 

Page 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-12 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

10 of 21
Exhibit 

Page 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-12 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

11 of 21
Exhibit 

Page 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-12 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

12 of 21
Exhibit 

Page 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-12 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

13 of 21
Exhibit 

Page 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-12 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

14 of 21
Exhibit 

Page 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-12 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

15 of 21
Exhibit 

Page 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-12 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

16 of 21
Exhibit 

Page 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-12 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

17 of 21
Exhibit 

Page 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-12 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

18 of 21
Exhibit 

Page 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-12 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

19 of 21
Exhibit 

Page 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-12 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

20 of 21
Exhibit 

Page 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-12 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

21 of 21
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     
|----------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, John Jardine, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Silverstar Mining
      Corp. for the year ended September 30, 2008(the "Report") fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Silverstar Mining Corp.                                                                 

Dated: December 29, 2008

| | /s/ John Jardine                                           
| | -----------------------------------------------------------
| | John Jardine                                               
| | Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and
      Treasurer     
| | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
      Accounting
| | Officer)                                                   
| | Silverstar Mining Corp.                                    

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Silverstar
Mining Corp. and will be retained by Silverstar Mining Corp. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
EX-35.3
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


Lares Asset Securitization, Inc.
101 California St.
13th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111

RE: Annual Statement as to Compliance

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows for the calendar year
2007 or applicable portion thereof (the "Reporting Period"):

(a) a review of Wells Fargo's activities as Master Servicer and/or Securities
Administrator under the servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto (the
"Servicing Agreement(s)") has been made under my supervision; and

(b) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review Wells Fargo has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material respects
throughout the Reporting Period.


March 1, 2008
/s/ Diane Courtney
DIANE COURTNEY
Vice President


(page)


(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Schedule A

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series

1 Pooling Agreement for Luminent Mortgage Trust 2006-7 Mortgage Pass Through
  Certificates Series 2006-7, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master Servicer and
  Securities Administrator, as applicable

2 Pooling Agreement for Luminent Mortgage Trust Mortgage Pass-Through
  Certificates, Series 2007-1, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master Servicer and
  Securities Administrator, as applicable

3 Pooling Agreement for Luminent Mortgage Trust Mortgage Pass-Through
  Certificates, Series 2007-2, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master Servicer and
  Securities Administrator, as applicable

4 Pooling and Servicing Agreements for LUMINENT 2006-6, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
  as Master Servicer and Securities Administrator, as applicable
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2674    Filed: 06/20/19    Entered: 06/20/19 09:23:41    Page 1 of2

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2674    Filed: 06/20/19    Entered: 06/20/19 09:23:41    Page 2 of2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-2837

MICHAEL E. RHODES; DANITA RHODES, Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
CARL R. SMITHERS; HOUSTON M. EADS; DAVID W. SKEEN, individually, and as officers of the West Virginia State Police; ROBIN K. WELCH, individually and as Prosecuting Attorney of Roane County, West Virginia; TONY MORGAN, individually, and as Special Prosecutor for Roane County, West Virginia, Defendants - Appellees, and DALLAS J. WOLFE; JOHN DOES, I through X, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., District Judge. (CA-94-188) Argued: July 9, 1996 Decided: July 29, 1996 Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, LUTTIG, Circuit Judge, and SHEDD, United States District Judge for the District of South Carolina, sitting by designation.2 Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ARGUED: Jeffrey Kent Phillips, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees Smithers, Eads, and Skeen; Travis Sutherland Haley, CLEEK, PULLING, KNOPF & FOWLER, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees Welch and Morgan. ON BRIEF: Kathy A. W. Arnold, Spencer, West Virginia, for Appellants. Steven P. McGowan, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees Smithers, Eads, and Skeen. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Michael Eugene Rhodes and his wife Danita Rhodes sued a special investigator, a deputy sheriff, a state trooper, a county prosecutor, and a special prosecutor, alleging that the five officials wrongfully investigated and prosecuted Michael Rhodes in connection with a jail break and the smuggling of contraband into the jail. The Rhodes claimed that the investigation violated Mr. Rhodes' civil rights and that both plaintiffs were the victims of intentionally inflicted emotional distress. The five officials sought summary judgment, arguing that they properly fulfilled their official obligations, had probable cause for the prosecutions, and were protected by absolute or qualified immunity. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the five defendants on the grounds of absolute immunity, qualified immunity, and plaintiffs' failure to set out facts sufficient to support several of the claims. The Rhodes appeal this ruling, arguing that the judge erred in granting summary judgment. Our review of the record and the appropriate legal standards in this case persuades us that the rulings of the district court were correct. We therefore affirm the judgment on the reasoning set forth in the district court's extensive and careful memorandum opinion. Rhodes v. Smithers , C.A. No. 2:94-0188 (S.D.W.Va. Sep. 15, 1995).

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5392 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5392

     To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for the 
determination of the employer mandate under the Patient Protection and 
   Affordable Care Act without regard to alien agricultural seasonal 
                                workers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 1, 2014

Mrs. Ellmers (for herself, Mr. Meadows, and Mr. Hudson) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for the 
determination of the employer mandate under the Patient Protection and 
   Affordable Care Act without regard to alien agricultural seasonal 
                                workers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fairness for Farmers Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. DETERMINATION OF EMPLOYER MANDATE WITHOUT REGARD TO ALIEN 
              AGRICULTURAL SEASONAL WORKERS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraphs (2)(E) and (4)(A) of sections 4980H(c) 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 are both amended by adding at the 
end the following: ``Such calculation shall not include any alien 
having status under section 101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(a)).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 5429    Filed: 01/21/20    Entered: 01/21/20 14:40:58    Page 1 of2

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 5429    Filed: 01/21/20    Entered: 01/21/20 14:40:58    Page 2 of2
#### In the Matter of Ernest W. Vann, Appellant, v James A. Baker, as Special Prosecutor, et al., Respondents.

Submitted January 16, 1996;

decided March 26, 1996

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that no appeal lies from the order of the individual Justice of the Appellate Division *(see,*CPLR 5602; NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b]).
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5295 

To amend title 49, United States Code, with respect to apportionments 

under the Airport Improvement Program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 30, 2014 

Mr. SMITH of Nebraska introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, with respect to 

apportionments under the Airport Improvement Program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Airport Regula5 tion Relief Act of 2014’’. 

6 SEC. 2. APPORTIONMENTS. 

7 Section 47114(c)(1) of title 49, United States Code, 

8 is amended by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(G) SPECIAL RULE FOR FISCAL YEARS

10 2015 AND 2016.—Notwithstanding subparagraph 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5295 IH

1 (A), the Secretary shall apportion to the spon2 sor of an airport under that subparagraph, for 

3 each of fiscal years 2015 and 2016, an amount 

4 based on the number of passenger boardings at 

5 the airport during calendar year 2012 if the 

6 airport had— 

7 ‘‘(i) fewer than 10,000 passenger 

8 boardings during the calendar year used to 

9 calculate the apportionment for fiscal year 

10 2015 or 2016 under subparagraph (A); 

11 and 

12 ‘‘(ii) 10,000 or more passenger 

13 boardings during calendar year 2012.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 1-T

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4901-11 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 16:12:26 Page 1

of 6
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4901-11 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 16:12:26 Page 2

of 6
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4901-11 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 16:12:26 Page 3

of 6
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4901-11 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 16:12:26 Page 4

of 6
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4901-11 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 16:12:26 Page 5

of 6
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4901-11 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 16:12:26 Page 6

of 6
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 105 (Wednesday, June 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 30870]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13186]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration 12168 and 12169]

Kentucky Disaster Number KY-00032

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 2.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the Commonwealth of Kentucky (FEMA-1912-DR), dated 
05/11/2010.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Flooding, Mudslides, and Tornadoes.
    Incident Period: 05/01/2010 and continuing.
    Effective Date: 05/24/2010.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 07/12/2010.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 02/11/2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the Presidential disaster 
declaration for the Commonwealth of Kentucky, dated 05/11/2010 is 
hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by 
the disaster:

Primary Counties: (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans): 
Anderson, Allen, Barren, Boyle, Elliott, Fleming, Garrard, Green, Hart, 
Henry, Jackson, Jessamine, Leslie, Magoffin, Menifee, Monroe, 
Montgomery, Nelson, Nicholas, Owen, Powell, Pulaski, Simpson, Warren, 
Washington.
Contiguous Counties: (Economic Injury Loans Only):
    Kentucky: Bell, Breathitt, Bullitt, Carroll, Clay, Edmonson, Floyd, 
Gallatin, Grant, Grayson, Hardin, Harlan, Harrison, Johnson, Knott, 
Lee, Mccreary, Oldham, Owsley, Perry, Robertson, Spencer, Trimble, 
Wayne, Wolfe.
    Tennessee: Clay, Macon, Sumner.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-13186 Filed 6-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.1          

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert C. Salipante, Principal Executive Officer of Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (U.S.) (the "Company"), hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2005, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 */s/Robert C. Salipante                       
Robert C. Salipante  
President 
August 12, 2005
 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 *
Exhibit 10.44

2010 Director Fees

For 2010, our non-employee directors (other than
Paul J. Klaassen) received the following annual Board fees. These fees are paid on a calendar-year basis, quarterly in advance. No separate meeting attendance fees are paid for attending meetings of Board committees.



|                                                                    |  |   |         | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | - | ------- | 
|Board Retainer                                                      |  | $ | 150,000 | 
|Committee Chair Retainer:                                           |  |   |         | 
|Audit Committee                                                     |  | $ | 25,000  | 
|Compensation Committee                                              |  | $ | 15,000  | 
|Fee for Serving on Audit Committee (other than the Committee Chair) |  | $ | 10,000  | 
|Lead Director Fee                                                   |  | $ | 50,000  | 

In addition, all
non-employee directors are reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred in attending meetings of the Board or Board committees.

For 2010, Mr. Klaassen, our non-executive chair of the Board, was paid $25,000 per month for advisory services on senior living
matters provided by him to Mark S. Ordan, our chief executive officer, during the months of August 2010 to December 2010. Mr. Klaassen did not receive any Board fees for 2010.

Mr. Ordan does not receive fees for serving on our Board.
#### Seamon Frank, Respondent, v. Adolph Firestone, Appellant.

Order affirmed by default, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Woodward and Rich, JJ., concurred.