alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Bob W. BROWN, Appellant, v. Harold A. COX, Warden, Appellee.

No. 8144.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

June 21, 1965.

*937James E. Birchby, Sheridan, Wyo., for appellant.

L. D. Harris, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., of N. M. (Boston E. Witt, Atty. Gen., of N. M., on brief), for appellee.

Before PHILLIPS, PICKETT and LEWIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico denying a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Brown was convicted and sentenced on his plea of guilty to the offense of grand larceny in a New Mexico state court. It is from that sentence that he seeks release.

At some time subsequent to his preliminary hearing before a New Mexico Justice of the Peace and prior to the time he was arraigned in the District Court, Brown retained counsel of his own choosing, who advised him to plead guilty to the grand larceny charge. Brown now contends that his guilty plea was the result of admissions and a statement made by him prior to the time he retained counsel, and coercion and promises made by state officials in violation of his constitutional rights. We find no merit to that contention.

To the contrary, from an examination of the record it is clear that Brown knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily entered a plea of guilty to the charge, with the advice of counsel of his own choosing. Neither the statements nor the admissions allegedly made by Brown were used against him. His plea of guilty under those circumstances constituted a waiver of the alleged defects which Brown now attempts to raise.1

The judgment should be and is affirmed.

1

. United States ex rel. Staples v. Pate, 7 Cir., 332 F.2d 531; Hoffman v. United States, 9 Cir., 327 F.2d 489, 490-491; Phillips v. United States, 5 Cir., 318 F. 2d 17; United States v. Koptik, 7 Cir., 300 F.2d 19, 22, cert. den. 370 U.S. 957, 82 S.Ct. 1609, 8 L.Ed.2d 823; United States v. Miller, 2 Cir., 293 F.2d 697, 698; United States v. Sturm, 7 Cir., 180 F. 2d 413, 415, cert. den. 339 U.S. 986, 70 S.Ct. 1008. 94 L.Ed. 1388.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of SmartHeat Inc. (the
“Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jun Wang, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m or §78o(d));
and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:
              /s/
      Jun WangDate:
      March 31, 2010
              
              Jun
      Wang
                Chief
      Executive Officer





This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of SteelCloud, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brian H. Hajost Chief
Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods
presented therein.




Date:
      September 15, 2009
                By:
                /s/
      Brian H. HajostName:
      Brian H. HajostTitle:
      Chief Executive Officer and
President
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION,

 - and -

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY,

Debtors.

☐ Affects PG&E Corporation 

☐ Affects Pacific Gas and 

Electric Company 

☒ Affects both Debtors

* All papers shall be filed in 

the Lead Case, No. 19-30088 (DM).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Bankruptcy Case

No. 19-30088-DM

Chapter 11

Jointly Administered

Date: October 8, 2019

Time: 10:00 AM (Pacific Time)

Place: Courtroom 17

450 Golden Gate Ave.

16th Floor

San Francisco, CA

ORDER ON REQUEST TO SHORTEN TIME

The court will not shorten time to hear on September 24, 

2019, the joint request to terminate exclusivity filed by the 

TCC and the Ad Hoc Committee of Senior Unsecured Noteholders 

(Dkt. No. 3940) in view of the Debtors’ opposition to that 

request. That is simply not enough time for the court to study 

and understand the details of the request and opposition, nor 

for the Debtors to prepare a meaningful response.

Signed and Filed: September 19, 2019

________________________________________

DENNIS MONTALI

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

Entered on Docket 

September 19, 2019

EDWARD J. EMMONS, CLERK 

U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3947 Filed: 09/19/19 Entered: 09/19/19 17:17:17 Page 1 of

2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

Because of the ramifications of terminating exclusivity and 

the need to keep these cases on track, however, the court will 

shorten time for the joint request to be heard on October 8, 

2019, at 10:00 AM. Debtors’ or any other parties’ response must 

be filed no later than October 1, 2019. No replies should be 

filed. 

The status conference on September 24, 2019, at 9:30 AM 

will remain on calendar. If the Debtors and the TCC agree that 

continuing it to October 8, 2019, at 10:00 AM would be more 

productive and efficient, they may file a joint stipulation to 

that effect by noon on September 23, 2019, in which case the 

status conference will be continued to that date.

**END OF ORDER**

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3947 Filed: 09/19/19 Entered: 09/19/19 17:17:17 Page 2 of

2
EX-34 (f)

(logo) KPMG

KPMG LLP
1601 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103-2499

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Members
Regulus Group LLC:

We have examined management's assessment for those customers that management has
informed us have requested confirmation of compliance, included in the
accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing
Criteria, that Regulus Group LLC complied with the servicing criteria set forth
in Item 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) of the Securities and Exchange
Commission's Regulation AB for remittance processing services to those issuers
of asset backed securities and servicers of loan and/or receivables portfolios
that include pool assets for asset backed securities transactions (the Platform)
as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006. Regulus Group LLC has determined
that the remainder of the servicing criteria are not applicable to the
activities it performs with respect to the Platform as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2006. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with
those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
management's assessment about the Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of
less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that
comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities
related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those
selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with
the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected
transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period
covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether
errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may
have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company
during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any
other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assessment that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006
is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Philadelphia, PA
February 22, 2007

KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, is the U.S. member firm of KPMG
International, a Swiss cooperative.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**CERTIFICATIONI, Clifton W. Sink, Jr., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of SteelCloud, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.              Date: June 22, 2006 By: /s/ Clifton W. Sink, Jr.           Name: Clifton W. Sink, Jr.    Title: Chief Executive Officer and President
Exhibit 33.7



|                                                       |  |  |  |                      
|------------------------------------------------------ |  |  |  | ---------------------
|[Letterhead of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association] |  |  |  | Wells Fargo Bank, NA 
|                                                       |  |  |  | Document Custody     
|                                                       |  |  |  | 1015  10thAvenue SE 
|                                                       |  |  |  | Minneapolis, MN 55014

ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA

Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the Company) is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria
set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company has determined that the servicing criteria are applicable in regards to the servicing platform as of and for the period as follows:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended)
residential mortgage-backed securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities issued on or after January 1, 2006 for which the Company provides document custody services, excluding any publicly issued transactions issued by any government
sponsored entity (the Platform).

Applicable Servicing Criteria: The servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)(1)(iv),
1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii), in regard to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform (the Applicable Servicing Criteria). Management of the Company has determined that all other servicing criteria set forth
in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the Platform.

Period: As of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 (the
Period).

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the following assessment of compliance with respect to the
Applicable Servicing Criteria:

1. The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

2. The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. In performing this assessment, the Company used the criteria set forth by the Securities
and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.

3. Based on such assessment, as of and for the Period, the Company has
complied, in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report
with respect to the Companys assessment of compliance as of and for the Period.



WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONBy:

/s/ Shari GillundName:

Shari GillundIts:

Senior Vice PresidentDated:

February 29, 2008
**EXHIBIT 35.2**

 

**WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATEANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

            I, Barbara Campbell, an authorized officer of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp. (the “Administrative Agent”), dohereby certify to WaMu Asset Acceptance Corp. (the “Depositor”) and Washington Mutual Bank (the “Servicer”), pursuant to the Amended and Restated Administrative Agent Agreement dated as of February 1, 2005 (the“Servicing Agreement”) by and between the Servicer, and the Administrative Agent the following with respect to Washington Mutual Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates WMALT Series 2007-OA1 Trust for the 2007 fiscal year  (the “RelevantYear”): 

1.                  A review of the activities of the AdministrativeAgent during the Relevant Year and of performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2.                  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review,the Administrative Agent has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Relevant Year, except that, prepayment fees due to investors were calculated incorrectly by the Administrative Agent on certain loanswith deferred interest, which amounts are required to be passed to investors in accordance with Section 3.04(b)(iv) of the applicable pooling and servicing agreement. The amount due as a result of these miscalculations will be delivered to the Trustee fordistribution once analysis of this matter has been completed and the amounts due have been determined.  Processes and procedures have been implemented and are currently being validated to provide for more accurate calculation of prepayment fees.

Dated as of March 1, 2008.

 
| /s/ Barbara Campbell Name:  Barbara Campbell Title:    First Vice President |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 516 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 516

                  To extend the payroll tax reduction.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 5, 2013

  Mr. Maffei introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                  To extend the payroll tax reduction.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Middle Class Payroll Tax Relief 
Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PAYROLL TAX REDUCTION.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (c) of section 601 of the Tax Relief, 
Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010 
(26 U.S.C. 1401 note) is amended by striking ``and 2012'' and inserting 
``, 2012, and 2013''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to remuneration received, and taxable years beginning, after 
December 31, 2012.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 107 (Friday, June 4, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 31761]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13397]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Connecticut Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights and the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act, that a planning meeting of the Connecticut 
State Advisory Committee will convene at 10:30 a.m. on Tuesday, June 
22, 2010 at the University of Connecticut, School of Law, Faculty 
Lounge, 55 Elizabeth Street, Hartford, Connecticut 06105. The purpose 
of the meeting is to consider possible findings and recommendations on 
a draft report about school choice, high school attainment rates, and 
civil rights.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments; the 
comments must be received in the regional office by July 22, 2010. The 
address is Eastern Regional Office, 624 9th St., NW., Washington, DC 
20425. Persons wishing to e-mail their comments, or who desire 
additional information should contact the Eastern Regional Office at 
202-376-7533 or by e-mail to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0d687f624d787e6e6e7f236a627b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="385d4a57784d4b5b5b4a165f574e">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require 
the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional 
Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the 
meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Eastern Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Eastern Regional Office at the above 
e-mail or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the rules and regulations 
of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, May 28, 2010.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2010-13397 Filed 6-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Charles Bouck, Appellant, v. Charles H. Wolston, Respondent.

Judgment reversed, new trial ranted, with costs to abide the event. Opinion by

Putnam, J.
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Summit
Environmental Corporation, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report"), I, B. Keith Parker, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78o(d)); and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November 18, 2004

                                            /s/ B. Keith Parker
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            B. Keith Parker
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


         The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350) and is not being filed as
part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.