alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           2,794
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,794
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,794
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,034
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,410,887
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,414,127)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,794
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,788
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (17,788)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (17,788)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (17,788)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5182 Filed: 12/20/19 Entered: 12/20/19 11:16:08 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5182 Filed: 12/20/19 Entered: 12/20/19 11:16:08 Page 2 of

2
Form TRANSC

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

California Northern Bankruptcy Court

In re Debtor(s):

PG&E Corporation

Case No.: 19−30088 DM 11

Chapter: 11

NOTICE OF FILING OF TRANSCRIPT

AND DEADLINES RELATED TO RESTRICTION AND REDACTION

A transcript of the proceeding held on September 13, 2022 at 10:00 AM was filed on September 14, 2022. The

following deadlines apply:

The parties have until Wednesday, September 21, 2022 to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction

of this transcript. The deadline for filing a request for redaction is Wednesday, October 5, 2022.

If a request for redaction is filed, the redacted transcript is due Monday, October 17, 2022.

If no such notice is filed, the transcript may be made available for remote electronic access upon expiration of the

restriction period, which is Tuesday, December 13, 2022, unless extended by court order.

To review the transcript for redaction purposes, you may purchase a copy from the transcriber,

Jason Gottlieb

Attn: Jason Gottlieb, Dir. of Tran. Ops.

7227 N 16th St. #207

Phoenix, AZ 85020

or you may view the document at the clerk's office public terminal.

Dated: 9/16/22 For the Court:

Edward J. Emmons

Clerk of Court

United States Bankruptcy Court

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 12954-1 Filed: 09/14/22 Entered: 09/14/22 11:09:32 Page 1

of 1
#### Louise E. Henzi, Appellant, *v.*Nessim D. Benezra, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

November 16, 1936.

*Holland & Armstrong [Jefferson Armstrong*of counsel], for the appellant.

*Lorenz J. Brosnan [Morgan J. Burke,- Jr.,*of counsel], for the respondent.

Pee Cubiam.

Plaintiff was operated on by defendant. She was wholly or partly under anesthesia for several hours during which time her adenoids were removed. After the operation she was returned to her bed in the hospital. Twenty-four hours later she noticed a tooth was injured. There is expert opinion evidence that the injury was of traumatic origin. Plaintiff claims that the rule of *res ipsa loquitur*applies and that she established a *prima facie*case of negligence on the part of defendant, the operating physician.

The doctrine of *res ipsa loquitur*is based on the consideration that control of the thing that produced the injury is exclusively with defendant. *(Stater*v. *Barnes,*241 N. Y. 284.)

During a large part of the period between the administration of the ether and the discovery of the injury, plaintiff was not under defendant’s care but that of the hospital. Under such circumstances plaintiff failed to establish defendant’s liability. Judgment affirmed, with twenty-five dollars costs.

All concur. Present — Ltd on, Levy and Callahan, JJ.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5048 Filed: 12/10/19 Entered: 12/10/19 12:02:09 Page 1 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5048 Filed: 12/10/19 Entered: 12/10/19 12:02:09 Page 2 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5048 Filed: 12/10/19 Entered: 12/10/19 12:02:09 Page 3 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5048 Filed: 12/10/19 Entered: 12/10/19 12:02:09 Page 4 of

4
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

# DATES:

Written comments should be received on or before July 9, 2010 to be assured of consideration.

##  Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)

*OMB Number:*                     1506-0045.                

*Type of Review:*                     Extension without change of a currently approved collection.                

*Title:*                     Imposition of Special Measure against Banco Delta Asis.                

*Description:*                     FinCEN is issuing this rulemaking to impose a special measure against Banco Delta Asia as a financial institution of primary money laundering concern, pursuant to the authority contained in 31 U.S.C. 5318A.                

*Affected Public:*                     Private Sector: Businesses or other for-profits.                

*Estimated Total Reporting Burden:*                     5,000 hours.                

*Bureau Clearance Officer:*                     Russell Stephenson (202) 354-6012, Department of the Treasury, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, P.O. Box 39, Vienna, VA 22183; (202) 354-6012.                

*OMB Reviewer:*                     Shagufta Ahmed, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503; (202) 395-7873.                

Celina Elphage,

Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. 2010-13850 Filed 6-8-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-02-P
EXHIBIT 11
               INTERCELL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
                        COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE
                                   (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                 Three Months Ended
                             -------------------------
                                    December 31,
                             -------------------------

                                 2004         2003
                             ------------  -----------
<S>                          <C>           <C>
Net loss                     $(  187,280)   ( 110,168)
                             ============  ===========

Weighted average number of
  common shares outstanding   23,858,741   17,386,004
Common equivalent shares
  representing shares
  issuable upon exercise of
  outstanding options and
  warrants and convertible
  stock                                -            -
                             ------------  -----------
                              23,858,741   17,386,004
                             ============  ===========
Basic and diluted loss per
  share applicable to
  common shareholders        $     (0.01)      (0.01)
                             ============  ===========
</TABLE>

Stock  options,  warrants  and convertible preferred stock are not considered in
the  calculations  for  those  periods  with  net  losses  as  the impact of the
potential  common  shares  (approximately  12,396,350  at  December 31, 2004 and
9,713,850  shares at December 31, 2003) would be to decrease net loss per share.


<PAGE>
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant
to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of January 9, 2007 (the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust
2007-A-X (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Corp., AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the
Servicer) and AFS Sensub Corp. in connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Controller of the Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 9, 2007 through December 31, 2007, and
its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge,
there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     |  |                           |  |  |  |                      
|------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------
|AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. |  |                           |  | 
|                                     |  |                           | 
|By:                                  |  | /s/ James Fehleison       |  |  |  | Dated: March 31, 2008
|                                     |  | James Fehleison           |  |  |  |                      
|                                     |  | Executive Vice President, |  |  |  |                      
|                                     |  | Controller                |  |  |  |
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-10469

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JORGE DAVALOS, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:96-CR-10-2

- - - - - - - - - - August 19, 1998 Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jorge Eduardo Davalos, prisoner # 28251-077, has filed a motion for appointment of counsel to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion for new trial and his motion for reconsideration of the order denying his motion for new trial. Davalos has failed to show that the evidence on which he relies for a new trial is “newly discovered” and was unknown to him at the time of trial. See United States v. Jaramillo , 42 F.3d 920, 924 (5th Cir. 1995). Therefore, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying his motion for new trial or his motionNo. 98-10469 -2- for reconsideration of that denial. See United States v. Time , 21 F.3d 635, 642-43 (5th Cir. 1994). Davalos cannot make a showing of a nonfrivolous issue for appeal. See Carson v. Polley , 689 F.2d 562, 586 (5th Cir. 1982). Accordingly, his appeal is dismissed and his motion for appointment of counsel is denied. See United States v. Boutwell , 896 F.2d 884, 888 (5th Cir. 1990) (one-judge order); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 4(a)
                                          
                            AMENDMENT TO FIRST AMENDMENT
                            TO CONVERTIBLE SUBORDINATED
                                 DEBENTURE DUE 2001
                              AND DEBENTURE AGREEMENT


PC QUOTE, INC., a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of
Delaware (the "Company"), and PHYSICIANS INSURANCE COMPANY OF OHIO, a
corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of Ohio ("PICO"), for
value received, hereby amend and modify that certain First Amendment to
Convertible Subordinated Debenture Due 2001 and Debenture Agreement dated May 5,
1997 (the "First Amendment") as follows:

1.   Revised Section 5.4 is to read as follows:

     5.4  QUICK RATIO.  The Company shall maintain, as of the last day of each
     calendar month, a ratio of Quick Assets to Current Liabilities of at least
     .1 to 1.0.  From and after April 30, 1998, the Company shall maintain, as
     of the last day of each calendar month, a ratio of Quick Assets to Current
     Liabilities of at least 1.15 to 1.0.

2.   Revised Section 5.5 is to read as follows:

     5.5  CURRENT RATIO.  The Company shall maintain, as of the last day of each
     calendar month, a ratio of Current Assets to Current Liabilities of at
     least .12 to 1.0.  From and after April 30, 1998, the Company shall
     maintain, as of the last day of each calendar month, a ratio of Current
     Assets to Current Liabilities of at least 1.15 to 1.0. 

3.   Revised Section 5.6 is to read as follows:

     5.6  DEBT-NET WORTH RATIO.  From and after April 30, 1998, the Company
     shall maintain, as of the last day of each calendar month, a ratio of Total
     Liabilities less Subordinated Debt to Tangible Subordinated Debt of not
     more than 1.0 to 1.0.

4.   No other provision of the First Amendment shall be affected by this
Amendment other than as set forth above.  Further, this Amendment shall not
constitute, nor shall it be claimed to be, a waiver of any of the Company's
duties or PICO's rights in connection with the First Amendment or the
Convertible Subordinated Debenture Due 2001 described in the First Amendment,
nor shall this Amendment constitute, nor shall it be claimed to be, a waiver of
any claim that PICO now has against the Company.

     Dated: March 26, 1998


ATTEST:                                      PC QUOTE, INC.,
                                             a Delaware corporation

By:  ____________________________________    By:  __________________________
 
Title:    _______________________________    Title:    _____________________


ATTEST:                                      PHYSICIANS INSURANCE COMPANY OF
                                             OHIO, an Ohio corporation

By:  ____________________________________    By:  __________________________
 
Title:    _______________________________    Title:    _____________________
BAKER 

&

HOSTETLER LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

 

5REHUW$-XOLDQ6%1

&HFLO\$'XPDV6%1

%$.(5	+267(7/(5//3

%DWWHU\6WUHHW6XLWH

6DQ)UDQFLVFR&$

7HOHSKRQH 

)DFVLPLOH 

(PDLOUMXOLDQ#EDNHUODZFRP

(PDLOFGXPDV#EDNHUODZFRP

(ULF(6DJHUPDQ6%1

/DXUHQ7$WWDUG6%1

%$.(5	+267(7/(5//3

:LOVKLUH%RXOHYDUG6XLWH

/RV$QJHOHV&$

7HOHSKRQH 

)DFVLPLOH 

(PDLOHVDJHUPDQ#EDNHUODZFRP

(PDLOODWWDUG#EDNHUODZFRP

Counsel for Official Committee of Tort Claimants

81,7('67$7(6%$1.5837&<&2857

1257+(51',675,&72)&$/,)251,$

6$1)5$1&,6&2',9,6,21

,QUH

3*	(&25325$7,21

DQG

3$&,),&*$6$1'(/(&75,&

&203$1<

  'HEWRUV

 &DVH1R'0

&KDSWHU

/HDG&DVH

-RLQWO\$GPLQLVWHUHG

Ƒ$IIHFWV3*	(&RUSRUDWLRQ

Ƒ$IIHFWV3DFLILF*DVDQG(OHFWULF&RPSDQ\

Ŷ$IIHFWVERWK'HEWRUV

*All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case, 

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

 

&(57,),&$7(2)6(59,&(

 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4376 Filed: 10/22/19 Entered: 10/22/19 08:36:15 Page 1 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4376 Filed: 10/22/19 Entered: 10/22/19 08:36:15 Page 2 of

3
(;+,%,7$

1RWLFH3DUWLHV6HUYLFH/LVW

6HUYHGDVVHWIRUWKEHORZ

^Z/Wd/KE ED EKd/ED Z^^ D/>

Dd,KK&

^Zs/

ŽƵŶƐĞůƚŽĞďƚŽƌƐ tĞŝů͕'ŽƚƐŚĂůΘDĂŶŐĞƐ>>W

ƚƚŶ͗^ƚĞƉŚĞŶ<ĂƌŽƚŬŝŶ͕ZĂĐŚĂĞů&ŽƵƐƚ͕:ĞƐƐŝĐĂ>ŝŽƵ͕DĂƚƚŚĞǁ'ŽƌĞŶ

ϳςϳ&ŝĨƚŚǀĞŶƵĞEĞǁzŽƌŬ͕EzϭϬϭρϯͲϬϭϭε

ƐƚĞƉŚĞŶ͘ŬĂƌŽƚŬŝŶΛǁĞŝů͘ĐŽŵƌĂĐŚĂĞů͘ĨŽƵƐƚΛǁĞŝů͘ĐŽŵũĞƐƐŝĐĂ͘ůŝŽƵΛǁĞŝů͘ĐŽŵŵĂƚƚŚĞǁ͘ŐŽƌĞŶΛǁĞŝů͘ĐŽŵ ŵĂŝů

ŽƵŶƐĞůƚŽĞďƚŽƌƐ <ĞůůĞƌΘĞŶǀĞŶƵƚƚŝ>>W ƚƚŶ͗dŽďŝĂƐ<ĞůůĞƌ͕:ĂŶĞ<ŝŵ

ςρϬĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕^ƵŝƚĞϭεϬϬ

^ĂŶ&ƌĂŶĐŝƐĐŽ͕εκϭϬΘ

ƚŬĞůůĞƌΛŬĞůůĞƌďĞŶǀĞŶƵƚƚŝ͘ĐŽŵũŬŝŵΛŬĞůůĞƌďĞŶǀĞŶƵƚƚŝ͘ĐŽŵ ŵĂŝů

ĞďƚŽƌƐ

W'ΘŽƌƉŽƌĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚWĂĐŝĨŝĐ'ĂƐĂŶĚůĞĐƚƌŝĐŽŵƉĂŶLJ ƚƚŶ͗:ĂŶĞƚ>ŽĚƵĐĂ

ϳϳĞĂůĞ^ƚƌĞĞƚW͘K͘ŽdžϳϳϬϬϬϬ^ĂŶ&ƌĂŶĐŝƐĐŽ͕εκϭϬρ &ŝƌƐƚůĂƐƐDĂŝů

KĨĨŝĐĞŽĨƚŚĞhŶŝƚĞĚ^ƚĂƚĞƐdƌƵƐƚĞĞ KĨĨŝĐĞŽĨƚŚĞhŶŝƚĞĚ^ƚĂƚĞƐdƌƵƐƚĞĞ

ƚƚŶ͗:ĂŵĞƐ>͘^ŶLJĚĞƌ͕ƐƋ͘ΘdŝŵŽƚŚLJ>ĂĨƌĞĚĚŝ͕ƐƋ

κρϬ'ŽůĚĞŶ'ĂƚĞǀĞŶƵĞρƚŚ&ůŽŽƌ͕^ƵŝƚĞηϬρͲϬϭρϯ^ĂŶ&ƌĂŶĐŝƐĐŽ͕εκϭϬϮ

:ĂŵĞƐ͘>͘^ŶLJĚĞƌΛƵƐĚŽũ͘ŐŽǀƚŝŵŽƚŚLJ͘Ɛ͘ůĂĨĨƌĞĚŝΛƵƐĚŽũ͘ŐŽǀ

ŵĂŝů

ŽƵŶƐĞůĨŽƌƚŚĞKĨĨŝĐŝĂůŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞŽĨhŶƐĞĐƵƌĞĚƌĞĚŝƚŽƌƐ DŝůďĂŶŬ>>W

ƚƚŶ͗ĞŶŶŝƐ&͘ƵŶŶĞ͕^ĂŵƵĞů͘<ŚĂůŝů

ρρ,ƵĚƐŽŶzĂƌĚƐEĞǁzŽƌŬ͕EzϭϬϬϬϭͲϮϭςϯ

ĚĚƵŶŶĞΛŵŝůďĂŶŬ͘ĐŽŵƐŬŚĂůŝůΛŵŝůďĂŶŬ͘ĐŽŵ ŵĂŝů

ŽƵŶƐĞůĨŽƌƚŚĞKĨĨŝĐŝĂůŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞŽĨhŶƐĞĐƵƌĞĚƌĞĚŝƚŽƌƐ DŝůďĂŶŬ>>W

ƚƚŶ͗WĂƵů^͘ƌŽŶnjŽŶ͕'ƌĞŐŽƌLJ͘ƌĂLJ͕dŚŽŵĂƐZ͘<ƌĞůůĞƌ

ϮϬϮεĞŶƚƵƌLJWĂƌŬ͕ϯϯƌĚ&ůŽŽƌ>ŽƐŶŐĞůĞƐ͕εϬϬςϳ

WĂƌŽŶnjŽŶΛŵŝůďĂŶŬ͘ĐŽŵ'ďƌĂLJΛŵŝůďĂŶŬ͘ĐŽŵd<ƌĞůůĞƌΛŵŝůďĂŶŬ͘ĐŽŵ ŵĂŝů

&ĞĞdžĂŵŝŶĞƌ ƚƚŶ͗ƌƵĐĞ͘DĂƌŬĞůů

ρκϭE͘&ĂŝƌďĂŶŬƐŽƵƌƚ͕^ƵŝƚĞϮϮϬϬŚŝĐĂŐŽ͕/>ςϬςϭϭͲϯϳϭϬ

ďĂŵĞdžĂŵƉŐĞΛŐŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵƉŐĞΛůĞŐĂůĚĞĐŽĚĞƌ͘ĐŽŵƚƌĂĐĞLJƌŐĂůůĞŐŽƐΛŐŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵ ŵĂŝů

ŽƵŶƐĞůƚŽ&ĞĞdžĂŵŝŶĞƌ ^ĐŽƚƚ,͘DĐEƵƚƚ ^ĐŽƚƚ,͘DĐEƵƚƚ

ϯϮκtĂƌƌĞŶZŽĂĚ^ĂŶDĂƚĞŽ͕εκκϬϮ ƐŵĐŶƵƚƚΛŵůͲƐĨ͘ĐŽŵ ŵĂŝů

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4376 Filed: 10/22/19 Entered: 10/22/19 08:36:15 Page 3 of

3
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 54 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 54

To provide that no pay adjustment for Members of Congress shall be made 
    with respect to any pay period occurring during the One Hundred 
                          Thirteenth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2013

Mr. Fitzpatrick (for himself, Mr. Posey, Mr. McKinley, Mr. Michaud, Mr. 
 Tiberi, Mrs. Miller of Michigan, Mr. Griffin of Arkansas, Mr. Jones, 
Mr. Luetkemeyer, Mr. Matheson, Mr. Garrett, Mr. Tipton, Mr. Gibbs, Mr. 
Terry, Mr. Hanna, Mr. Yoder, Mr. Polis, Mr. Wittman, Mrs. Hartzler, Mr. 
    Huizenga of Michigan, Mr. Bucshon, Mr. Mica, Mr. Culberson, Mr. 
   Mulvaney, Mr. Schweikert, Mr. Nugent, Ms. Jenkins, Mr. Lance, Mr. 
Olson, Mr. Flores, Mrs. Black, Mr. Marino, Mr. Kelly, Mr. Boustany, Mr. 
    Graves of Missouri, Mr. Coble, Mr. Palazzo, Mr. Bilirakis, Mr. 
  Lankford, and Mr. Stivers) introduced the following bill; which was 
 referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to 
 the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide that no pay adjustment for Members of Congress shall be made 
    with respect to any pay period occurring during the One Hundred 
                          Thirteenth Congress.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NO PAY ADJUSTMENT FOR MEMBERS OF CONGRESS DURING ONE HUNDRED 
              THIRTEENTH CONGRESS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no adjustment shall be 
made under section 601(a) of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 
(2 U.S.C. 31), relating to compensation of Members of Congress, with 
respect to any pay period occurring during the One Hundred Thirteenth 
Congress.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered June 6 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 15 - 00718 - CV RSL FUNDING, LLC AND RSL SPECIAL - IV, LIMITED PARTNERS HIP, Appellant s V. RICKEY NEWSOME, Appellee On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 14 - 14580 - L



### O RDER Appellants’ May 26, 2016 motion for leave to file a post

- submission brief is GRANTED
. The brief tendered along with the motion is deemed filed as of the date of this order.
/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS PRESIDING JUSTICE