alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Filed 8/26/22 P. v. Rebolledo CA2/5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinio n has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

THE PEOPLE

,

Plaintiff and Respondent

,

v.

FERNANDO REBOLLEDO

,

Defe ndant and Appellant. B316179

(Los Angeles County

Super. Ct. No.

YA0 9 1 800 )

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los

Angeles County, H e ctor M. Gu zman , Judge. Dismissed.

Richard B. L e nn on and Cheryl Lutz , u nder appoint m ent by

the Court of Appea l, for De fendant and Appellant.

No appearance by Plaintiff and Respondent.2 In October 2 015, d efendant and appellant Fernando

Rebolledo (defendant) pled no contest to three criminal charges :

continuous sexual abuse o f a child (P e n. Code

, § 288 .5 , subd

. ( a) )

,

lewd or lascivious act on a child under the age of 14 (Pen.

Code, § 288, s ubd

. (a) )

, and unlawful sexual intercourse with a

minor (Pen. Code

, § 261.5 , subd. (c) ). The trial court sentenced

him to 18 years in pr is on

. Almost a year later, in August 2016,

the court held a restitu tion hearing and ordered defendant to

make restitution to the Victim Compensation and Government

Claims Board in the amo unt of $8,535 ( plus interest )

.

Defendant d id not appeal the restitutio n order. But five

years later, in 2021, d efendant filed what he styled as a petition

to modify or contest the trial court ’ s restitution order

. The trial

court denied that petition

, an d d efenda nt noticed an appeal from

the denial o rder

. De fendant ’ s attor neys on appea l file d an

opening brief that asks this court to proceed via the pr ocedure

d escribed in People v. Serrano (2012) 211 Cal.App. 4th 496 an d

suggest s the order den y ing defendant ’ s petition is an appealable

orde r becaus e it affects defendant ’ s subs tan ti al righ t s or

constitutes an unauthor ized sentence

.

That is wrong on both counts

. The order from which

defendant purports to appea l is not appealable. ( P eople v.

Howerton (1953) 40 Cal.2d 217, 220 ; see also People v. King

(2 022) 77 Cal.App.5th 629, 6 37

- 639 ; Peopl e v. Turrin ( 2009) 176

Ca l.App. 4th 1200, 1208

- 1209 .)3 DISPOSITION

The appeal is dismisse d.

NOT TO BE PU BLISHED IN THE OF FICIAL REPORTS

BAKER, J.

W e concur:

RUBIN

, P. J.

MOOR , J.
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the annual report of Ring Energy, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned principal executive and financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Date:  March 31, 2011   /s/ Robert Steve Owens Robert Steve Owens, President & Treasurer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Carreker Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for thequarterly period ending October 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lisa K. Peterson,Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.

 

 
|                                        |
|---------------------------------------------|
| /s/    LISA K. PETERSON |
| Lisa K. Peterson, Chief  Financial Officer  |

 

 

Dated:    December 10, 2004

 

 

----
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4246    Filed: 10/17/19    Entered: 10/17/19 12:00:32    Page 1 of2

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4246    Filed: 10/17/19    Entered: 10/17/19 12:00:32    Page 2 of2
EXHIBIT C 

48 I 0-3966-9932.1 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4935-3 Filed: 12/02/19 Entered: 12/02/19 13:52:15 Page 1

of 2
EXPENSE SUMMARY (COBLENTZ PATCH DUFFY & BASS LLP) FOR THE PERIOD 

OCTOBER 1, 2019 THROUGH OCTOBER 31, 2019 

EXPENSES AMOUNTS 

Computerized Research NIA 

Meals NIA 

Travel NIA 

Transportation NIA 

Duplicating NIA 

Transcription (Deposition) Services NIA 

Third Party Consulting Fees NIA 

Telephone Conferencing NIA 

Messenger NIA 

Filing Fees NIA 

Court Reporter $2,451.45 

Court Website Subscription Fee for Case No. JCCP4974 NIA 

Total Expenses Requested: $2,451.45 

4810-3966-9932. l Exhibit C 

\ 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4935-3 Filed: 12/02/19 Entered: 12/02/19 13:52:15 Page 2

of 2
#### Lucy E. Barton and Jesse B. Barton *v.*Conrad Steinmitz and Herman Eilenberger.

*Mechanic's Leins—Enforcement*of—Practice.

The terms upon which, and the manner in which, mechanic’s liens shall be given and enforced, are governed by the laws in force when the mechanic seeks the benefit of the lien the law gives.

[Opinion filed June 30, 1890.]

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Henry M. Shepard, Judge, presiding.

Mr. W. W. Bristol, for appellants.

Messrs. Abbott & Baker, for appellees.

Gary, P. J.

By an agreement, dated April 13, 1887, the appellees undertook to do a part of the carpenter work of a dwelling house and stable, about to be erected for the appel*142lants named in the title above. When the work, was, in fact, done, does not appear; but as the certificate of the architects for the final payment is dated September 21,1887, a good portion of it was, doubtless, done before the act of May 31, 1887, by which Sec. 4 of the act of 1874, in relation to liens, was amended, went into force, on July 1, 1887. There was no attempt by the appellees to comply, either with that section as amended, or with the provisions of See. 35, as amended by the act of June 16, 1887, which went into force, also, on July 1,1887.

The appellees concede, and it would be true if they did not, that to acquire a lien under contracts made after those amendments were in force, a compliance with them is necessary: Their position is,.that they do not apply to earlier contracts. But on this subject the decision of the Supreme court in Templeton v. Horne, 82 Ill. 491, is decisive, and see Hanes v. Wady, 41 N. W. Rep. (Mich.) 222. The terms upon which, and the manner in which, mechanics’ liens shall be given and enforced, are governed by the laws in force when the mechanic seeks the benefit of the lien the law gives. True, it is said, *apropos*to no question in the case, in Clarke v. Moore, 64 Ill. 273, that “ when the contract to perform labor is made, the lien attaches.” It may very well be that between the mechanic and incumbrancers, as to the value he adds to the premises, or even as to their value as they stood when he made the contract, which he afterward performed, his lien will relate back, under ordinary circumstances, to the date of his contract.

This case calls for no consideration of that question. It may be argued, when the question does arise, that Gove v. Cather, 23 Ill. 634, tends that way. But that case and the cases therein cited held, that it is the performance of the contract that gives the lien, which, “as a rich, oriental perfume pervades every vacant space of the loftiest chamber, so does this subtle essence insinuate itself into every fibre of the material.”

When the performance of the contract in this case was completed, the amendments of 1887 were in force, and the *143appellees could have no lien without compliance with them. The decree must, therefore, be reversed and the case remanded with directions to the Superior Court to dismiss the petition at the cost of the appellees.

*Reversed, and remanded.*
United States Bankruptcy Court

Northern District of California

In re: PG&E CORPORATION and Chapter 11

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, Case No.: 19-30088 (DM)

Debtors Jointly Administered

TRANSFER OF CLAIM OTHER THAN FOR SECURITY

A CLAIM HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS CASE or deemed filed under 11 U.S.C. § 1111(a). Transferee

hereby gives notice pursuant to Rule 3001(e)(2), Fed. R. Bankr. P., of the transfer, other than for security,

of the claim referenced in this evidence and notice.

Sencha Funding, LLC Haley & Aldrich, Inc.

Haley & Aldrich Construction Services, 

Inc.

Name of Transferee Name of Transferors

Name and Address where notices to transferee Court Claim #: 65639

should be sent: Claim Amount: $950,003.19

Date Claim Filed: 10/18/2019

Sencha Funding, LLC

c/o Farallon Capital Management, L.L.C. Court Claim #: 78170

One Maritime Plaza, Suite 2100 Claim Amount: $315.00

San Francisco, CA 94111 Date Claim Filed: 10/25/2019

Attn: Michael G. Linn Schedule Numbers: 1031548

Tel: 1 415 421 2132 1032046

Email: mlinn@faralloncapital.com

Last Four Digits of Acct #: ______N/A______ Last Four Digits of Acct. #: ____N/A_____

Name and Address where transferee payments 

should be sent (if different from above)

I declare under penalty of perjury that the information provided in this notice is true and correct to the best

of my knowledge and belief.

By:_/s/ Andrew A. Jones_______________ Date: November 11, 2019

Transferee/Transferee’s Agent

Penalty for making a false statement: Fine of up to $500,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years, or both. 18 U.S.C. §§ 152 & 3571.

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4649 Filed: 11/11/19 Entered: 11/11/19 10:00:32 Page 1 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4649 Filed: 11/11/19 Entered: 11/11/19 10:00:32 Page 2 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4649 Filed: 11/11/19 Entered: 11/11/19 10:00:32 Page 3 of

3
**CANADA**    Cinemark Theatres Canada, Inc., a New Brunswick corporation    Cinemark Holdings Canada, Inc., an Ontario corporation    Century Theatres of Canada, ULC, a Canadian corporation **CENTRAL AMERICA**    Cinemark Panama, S.A., a Panamanian joint stock company    Cinemark Equity Holdings Corporation, a British Virgin Islands    corporation    Cinemark Costa Rica, S.R.L., a Costa Rican limited liability    company    Cinemark El Salvador, Ltda de C.V., an El Salvadorian limited    liability company    Cinemark Nicaragua y Cia, Ltda., a Nicaraguan limited liability    company    Cinemark Honduras S. de R.L., a Honduran limited liability    company    Cinemark Guatemala Ltda., a Guatemalan limited company **CHILE**    Cinemark Chile S.A., a Chilean corporation    Inversiones Cinemark, S.A., a Chilean corporation    Worldwide Invest, Inc., a British Virgin Islands corporation **COLOMBIA**    Cinemark Colombia S.A., a Colombian corporation **ECUADOR**    Cinemark del Ecuador S.A., an Ecuadorian corporation **MEXICO**    Cinemark Holdings Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V., a Mexican limited    liability company    Cinemark de Mexico, S.A. de C.V., a Mexican corporation    Servicios Cinemark, S.A. de C.V., a Mexican corporation    Cinemark del Norte, S.A. de C.V., a Mexican corporation    Cinemark Plex S. de R.L. de C.V., a Mexican limited liability    company **PERU**    Cinemark del Peru S.R.L., a Peruvian limited liability company **SPAIN**    Cinemark Holdings Spain, S.L., a Spanish limited liability    company
#### AGNES ALLEN, by Her Next Friend, H. A. ALLEN, v. KENTUCKY-VIRGINIA STONE COMPANY, LON LAMBERT, ERNEST GALLOWAY, and PAUL McCURRY.

(Filed 13 October, 1937.)

Appeal by the defendants Kentucky-Yirginia Stone Company and Lon Lambert from a refusal to grant a petition for removal to the Federal Court by *Alley, J.,*at June Special Term, 1937, of Yancey.

Affirmed.

*Huslcins <& Wilson for plaintiff, appellee.*

*Jones & Ward and J. M. Horner, Jr., for defendants, appellants.*

*256Pose. Ctjeiam.

The plaintiff in this case alleges that she was injured while a passenger in the truck owned by Galloway and driven by Mc-Curry at the time of the collision with the truck owned by the Kentucky-Yirginia Stone Company and driven by Lambert referred to in the case of Clark Hall, administrator of Lee Hall, against the same defendants as in this ease. The decision of this case is governed by the decision of the *Hall case, ante,*254.

Affirmed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BAKER 

&

HOSTETLER LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

Notice Parties

PG&E Corporation

c/o Pacific Gas & Electric Company

Attn: Janet Loduca, Esq. 

77 Beale Street

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Keller & Benvenutti LLP

Attn: Tobias S. Keller, Esq. 

 Jane Kim, Esq. 

650 California Street, Suite 1900 

San Francisco, CA 94108 

The Office of the United States Trustee for Region 17

Attn: James L. Snyder, Esq.

 Timothy Laffredi, Esq. 

450 Golden Gate Avenue, 5th Floor, Suite #05-0153 

San Francisco, CA 94102 

Milbank LLP

Attn: Dennis F. Dunne, Esq. 

 Sam A. Khalil, Esq. 

55 Hudson Yards 

New York, NY 10001-2163 

Milbank LLP

Attn: Paul S. Aronzon, Esq. 

 Gregory A. Bray, Esq. 

 Thomas R. Kreller, Esq. 

2029 Century Park East, 33rd Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90067 

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP

Attn: Stephen Karotkin, Esq. 

 Rachael Foust, Esq. 

767 Fifth Avenue 

New York, NY 10153-0119 

Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP

Attn: Kristopher M. Hansen, Esq. 

 Erez E. Gilad, Esq. 

 Matthew G. Garofalo, Esq. 

180 Maiden Lane 

New York, NY 10038-4982

Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP

Attn: Frank. A. Merola, Esq. 

2029 Century Park East 

Los Angeles, CA 90067-3086 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3393-4 Filed: 08/06/19 Entered: 08/06/19 17:27:03 Page 1

of 1
Exhibit 31.2         

CERTIFICATION

I, Gary Corsi, certify that: 

1.	I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (U.S.);

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) [Omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238];

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: May 15, 2006
EXHIBIT
10.27


AMENDMENT
TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




This Amendment (this
“Amendment”)
to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated December 30, 2008 between
Greenlight Reinsurance, Ltd. (the “Company”)
and Barton Hedges (the “Executive”)
(the “Employment
Agreement”) is entered into this 18th day of
February 2009.  Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined
herein shall have the meanings given them in the Employment
Agreement.




RECITALS




Whereas,
the Company employs the Executive as its President and Chief Underwriting
Officer pursuant to the Employment Agreement;
and




Whereas,
the parties have determined it to be in their best interests to amend the
Employment Agreement to increase the Executive’s Base Salary effective as of
January 1, 2009.




Now,Therefore,Be It
Resolved, that in consideration of the mutual premises, covenants and
agreements herein contained, the parties agree as
follows:




Resolved,
effective as of January 1, 2009 the first sentence of Section 5(a) of the
Employment Agreement shall be amended to read as
follows:




“During
the Employment Period, the Company shall pay Executive a base salary at the rate
of not less than US $500,000 per year (“Base
Salary”).”




Further
Resolved, that except as otherwise expressly set forth in this Amendment,
all provisions, terms and conditions in the Employment Agreement remain
unmodified and in full force and effect, and the Employment Agreement is hereby
in all respects ratified and confirmed.




Further
Resolved, that this Amendment, together with the Employment Agreement,
sets forth the entire agreement and understanding of the parties relating to the
subject matter herein.  No modification of or amendment to this Amendment, nor any waiver
of any rights under this Amendment, shall be effective unless given in a writing
signed by the party to be charged.




Further
Resolved, that this Amendment may be executed in duplicate counterparts,
each of which shall be deemed to be an original and all of which, taken
together, shall constitute one agreement.









[signature
page follows]







IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of
the date first written above.





GREENLIGHT
      REINSURANCE, LTD.By: /s/
      Leonard GoldbergName:  Leonard
      GoldbergTitle:  CEO
      and Director





EXECUTIVE/s/ Barton
      HedgesBarton
      Hedges
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*Thomas F. Gillaine v. Charles H. Woodman and others, Commissioners, etc.

Order affirmed on opinions of

Van Brunt and Lawrence, JJ.
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION

I, Robert C. Salipante, certify that: 

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (U.S.);

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: November 14, 2003

*/s/ Robert C. Salipante                   
Robert C. Salipante  
President*