alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CARREKER-ANTINORI, INC.'S CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
NINE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                          16,405
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,551
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,382
<INVENTORY>                                         25
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,113
<PP&E>                                           8,486
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,587
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  76,326
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,014
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           186
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,137
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    76,326
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                54,221
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,922
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   280
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,253
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,971
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,282
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,282
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .28


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT D

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4775-4 Filed: 11/15/19 Entered: 11/15/19 15:59:34 Page 1

of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO 

Coordination Proceeding Special Title 

(CRC 3.550) 

BUTTE FIRE CASES 

Case No. JCCP 4853 

[P: ORDER GRANTING 

MOTION FOR ENTRY OF 

STIPULATED JUDGMENT 

The joint motion of Defendants Pacific Gas and Electric Company and PG&E Corporation 

(collectively, "PG&E") and Plaintiffs Barbara Jean Zelmer and Robert Thomas Zelmer 

(collectively, "Zelmers") for an order entering judgment in accordance with the terms of the 

Stipulated Judgment entered between the Zelmers and PG&E came on for hearing in Department 

42of*isCour,o„te§^*' ' 

Having read the motion and the proposed Stipulated Judgment, and having heard argument 

by counsel, the Court hereby grants PG&E's Motion for Entry of Stipulated Judgment. 

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT the joint motion is GRi^^D , and that final 

judgment will be entered pursuant to the Stipulated Jud^l ^ between PG^B and the Zelmers. 

DATED: ©eteber _ , 2018 

lonorable^llen H. Sunmer 

Judge of the Superior Court 

NOV 2 9 2018 

By B. Loriga, Deputy Clerk 

-1- Case No. JCCP 4853 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4775-4 Filed: 11/15/19 Entered: 11/15/19 15:59:34 Page 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED JUDGMENT 

of 2
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Ronald H. Friesen, principal financial officer of Sun Life Assurance Company of
Canada (U.S.) (the "Company"), hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Ronald H.
      FriesenRonald
      H. FriesenSenior
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(principal
      financial officer)August
      14, 2008
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153-0119

EXHIBIT 1-N

Legal Observation Support Services

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-15 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page 1

of 14
REDACTED VERSION OF THE PROPOSED REDACTED DOCUMENT

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-15 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page 2

of 14
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-15 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page 3

of 14
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-15 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page 4

of 14
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-15 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page 5

of 14
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-15 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page 6

of 14
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-15 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page 7

of 14
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-15 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page 8

of 14
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-15 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page 9

of 14
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-15 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page

10 of 14
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-15 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page

11 of 14
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-15 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page

12 of 14
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-15 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page

13 of 14
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-15 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page

14 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP

425 Lexington Ave

New York, NY 10017

Exhibit A 

Date 

Statement 

Filed 

Period 

Covered 

Total Compensation and 

Expenses Incurred for Period 

Covered 

Total Amount of 

Fees Authorized to 

be Paid Pursuant to 

Interim 

Compensation 

Order 

Total Amount of 

Expenses 

Authorized to be 

Paid Pursuant to 

Interim 

Compensation 

Order 

Objected 

Amount 

Holdback 

Fees Amount 

Fees Expenses 

Fees w/ No 

Objection 

(@ 80%) 

Expenses 

(@ 100%) 

Fees w/ No 

Objection 

(@ 20%) 

September 

30 2019 

07/01/19

-

07/31/19 

$709,809.00 $568.59 $544,854.40 $568.59 $28,741.00 $136,213.60 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4490-1 Filed: 10/28/19 Entered: 10/28/19 15:01:41 Page 1

of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153-0119

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 

Stephen Karotkin (pro hac vice) 

(stephen.karotkin@weil.com) 

Ray C. Schrock, P.C. (pro hac vice) 

(ray.schrock@weil.com) 

Jessica Liou (pro hac vice) 

(jessica.liou@weil.com) 

Matthew Goren (pro hac vice) 

(matthew.goren@weil.com) 

New York, NY 10153-0119 

Tel: (212) 310-8000 

Fax: (212) 310-8007 

KELLER & BENVENUTTI LLP 

Tobias S. Keller (#151445) 

(tkeller@kellerbenvenutti.com) 

Jane Kim (#298192) 

(jkim@kellerbenvenutti.com) 

650 California Street, Suite 1900 

San Francisco, CA 94108 

Tel: (415) 496-6723 

Fax: (415) 636-9251 

Attorneys for Debtors and Debtors in Possession 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION, 

 - and - 

Bankruptcy Case No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Chapter 11 

(Lead Case) (Jointly Administered) 

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION 

BETWEEN DEBTORS AND OFFICIAL 

COMMITTEE OF TORT CLAIMANTS 

EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO 

CEO COMPENSATION MOTION 

[No Hearing Requested] 

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, 

 Debtors. 

 Affects PG&E Corporation 

 Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company 

Affects both Debtors 

* All papers shall be filed in the lead case, 

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Signed and Filed: July 18, 2019

________________________________________

DENNIS MONTALI

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

Entered on Docket 

July 18, 2019

EDWARD J. EMMONS, CLERK 

U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3052 Filed: 07/18/19 Entered: 07/18/19 11:02:46 Page 1 of

2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153-0119

The Court having considered the Stipulation Between Debtors and Official Committee of 

Tort Claimants Extending Time to Respond to CEO Compensation Motion (“Stipulation and 

Agreement for Order”), entered into by PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric 

Company, as debtors and debtors in possession (collectively, the “Debtors”), on the one hand, 

and the Official Committee of Tort Claimants (the “Tort Claimants Committee”), on the other 

hand, filed on July 17, 2019; and, pursuant to such stipulation and agreement of the Parties, and 

good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. The time for the Tort Claimants Committee to file and serve any response 

or opposition to the CEO Compensation Motion (as defined in the Stipulation and Agreement for 

Order) is extended through 9:00 a.m. (Pacific Time) on July 19, 2019. 

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT: 

Dated: July 17, 2019

BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP 

/s/ Cecily A. Dumas

Cecily A. Dumas

Attorneys for Official Committee of Tort Claimants

**END OF ORDER** 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3052 Filed: 07/18/19 Entered: 07/18/19 11:02:46 Page 2 of

2
C O U R T O F A P P E A LS EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEX AS ELPASO, TEXAS TE NE T H OSP I TA L S L I MI TE D, D/ B /A P R O V ID E N C E M E M O R IA L H O S P IT A L, Ap pe lla nt,
v. BA RBARA RI OFRI O, Appellee
. § § § § § § No . 0 8- 07 -0 02 64 -C V

Appea l from the County Court

a t L a w N o. Six of El Paso County , Texas (TC# 2007-337)

M EM OR

AN DU M OP IN ION Pending be fore the Court is Appellant’s motion to dism iss this appea l pursuant to T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.1(a)( 1). Appe llant repre sents to the Court that the parties have re ache d a settlement ag ree ment in the underly ing c ase a nd there fore it no longer

wishes to pursue this appeal. Appe llee has not objecte d to the motion, and there is no indication that dismissal would prevent Appe llee fr om s e e k in g a n y r e li e f to w h ic h s h e w o u ld o th e r w is e b e e n titled. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 4 2
. 1 ( a ) ( 1 )
. We there fore g rant Appe llant’s motion, and dismi ss the appeal pursuant to the par ties’ settlement ag ree ment. As the motion does not indicate the pa rties have ag ree d otherwise, costs will be taxed ag ainst Appellant. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.1(d).
KENNET H R. CARR, J ustice October 9, 2008 Be fo re M cC l u re , J
. , C ar r, J
. , an d Go m ez , J u d ge Gomez, J udg e, sitting by

assig nment
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet and Statement of Operations found on pages 3 and 4 of the Company's form
10-Q for the year-to-date.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                                 0
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                        1,572,715
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                          1,892,186
<EQUITIES>                                      83,972
<MORTGAGE>                                     609,535
<REAL-ESTATE>                                   94,716
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               2,426,085
<CASH>                                         292,317
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,145,184
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              1,213,123
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                   1,741
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          875,219
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,900
<OTHER-SE>                                     857,883
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,145,184
<PREMIUMS>                                     643,846
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             47,498
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               6,278
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  46,104
<BENEFITS>                                     643,476
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            54,702
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 45,548
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,893
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             37,655
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    37,655
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Renexablo Peha D, Rfed, Ooml.alon.z, 

.~ 

4he O-mny and the oentxoo4 be4w.o~ the aampr~‘. reprosontooonlrrsota ore mb.4 

the npmeentet%rea~ 

same Ooagur~, bmmby ax400 0t 4h0 wOtttiOn 

oa4erfn(l upOn the ~dutio. 

m, in $h? said wnThi ~rriktlan ‘1141~ Co be 

4&~“cip.+i#&+mplo~. :og ad& 

auwexe& ~.a$&ier cir.not 

Ml.. u&de .4ha oun4x.at by 

hi8 'OMpany.18' ,o~red by the 

ON= #vlo 84 0md0 88~004~-0u4 ia the'a~,tute& above. 

lr eí:14 h~4 rlea lii ~ :r th4hh a i l .e tit~tea do Ii.:o4 x p r aaa ly 

lnol&d@'.the iatk$ktLoa ‘or orrid. iirpirriiti iUi& u@ core tanoblo 

to tlad.la 4he 84ofutoa a neoea8ary bpl+o~t&oa~?h would s 

iwludo au* o~p~~t~io~. 

~, ::_. .. 

-oration for'4he ooxvlooa thud pertwd.~m boh*lf Of.hia 

00ap.n~ from dopo.ita psid in by.the xepreaento4ivea he hlroa 

uh~gea in any roapQQt relo4lre to ths mo4ter~jhore~tiOr diaouaalon his relationtip .40 hla'ooppony or hia ‘4a4- under 
the deflai4~oa;~~ &an In the 84a4u40. A Solu4ruotlea of 

the emplo~at..aIps4 8~404u4e uhlah reul6 bdaibhla suportt8.x wl4hln 4h6 4exyna et aueh Hatu48 would alao iP41tie 

oapoony whlgh h&OS 148 esployeea 4hreW 148 em tloa 

x. & U& Q o x l gezllEd r a w do 1 ~6k4 liOW th a tt h irs a 

the~lntentlm a? th* L@tiOtm. 

~~~t~e~ioro~a~(1t~yadfl~d~t~~ 

Q+%Q~ o f Ohlo do p ir o a rMnt ea t0 l 04f.w La tho oopooity 

deger&kd in yew fo4t6z &Ii ,148 SnS~OSWSS would not OCR 

*Lthf4 hs 0 p ~~+eaa o f eex l r9lown4 annoy low. 

m l omx4uuu with yoke rowoat uo are ret- 

"OF" h r mr i4h 4 h e r & lwo h teh y o u lno lea 8ned d we 4 nu4 

lkha top,~%‘tlnd4he ummr here6l~nto~auinqairy, 

u4iafaetoxy. .
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TYRECE LIGON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 250 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 1st day of March, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
# FILED March 27, 1998 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

CASA JUVE NILE SERVICES A SSOC.,) C/A NO. 03A01-9708-JV-00368 INC., ) and ) HAMBLEN JUVENILE TN DEPT. OF CHILDREN’S ) SERVICES, ) HON. MINDY NORTO N SEALS, ) JUDGE Petitioners-Appellees, ) ) v. ) ) CAROL ANN MUSICK , ) ) Defend ant-App ellant, ) ) IN THE MATTER O F: ) George Patrick Musick, d/ o/b: 09/25/86 ) Charlotte Dean Musick, d/ o/b: 11/09/90 ) Kathy Mary Musick, d/ o/b: 05/14/94 )

) AFFIRMED All Children Under Eight een Years of ) AND Age. ) REMANDED

JOHN KNO X WA LKUP , Attorney General and R eporter, and DOU GLAS EARL DIMO ND, Assistant A ttorney General, Nashville, for PetitionerAppellee Tennessee Department of Children’s Services.
EDW ARD KER SHA W, LE ONA RD & KER SHA W, Gree neville, for D efendan tAppellan t.

O P I N I O N Franks, J. In this act

ion to terminat

e the parental

rights of Carol Ann Musick,the2

Trial Judge found that

Musick had abandoned her childr en and she had not complied with her plan of care

and responsibil

ities. Musick has appealed. A groun d for termin ation of pa rental rights, ab andonm ent, is found in Tennessee Code Annotated §36-1-113(g) (1), and abandonment i s defined as a parent who has either wilful

ly fail ed to visit

or wilfully

failed to suppor

t a child withi

n four consecutive months i

mmediately pr

eceding the fil

ing of an action t

o terminate par

ental rights. T.C.A. §36-1-10 2(1)(a)(I).

The othe r ground f ound by the T rial Judge to te rminate pa rental rights was sub stantial non-c omplianc e by the paren t with the state ment of re sponsibilities in a perm anenc y plan or p lan of c are as p rovide d by the C ode. T .C.A. § 36-1-1 13(g)(2 ).

Our review of the Trial Court’s findings is de novo and we affirm the termination i

f the statut

ory ground for t

ermination is

established by clear and convincing evidence.

It is unnecess ary for us t o consider both grounds , since we conclude there is cl

ear and convincing evidence that the mothe r had abandoned the chil dren within the meaning of t he statutor

y ground for ter

minating parent

al rights on abandonment. The mother conceded t hat for at least one year pr ior to the fi

ling of the petition, she had not visit

ed with her childr

en. Her excuse was that she could not obtain transportation or did not schedule vi sits. The reasons given for not vi siting the children are not suppo rted in the record. For a substan tial part of this time, Musick’s boyfriend, as w ell as his neice , provided h er with trans portation. Th ere was p ublic transportat

ion available, and transpor tation was available through the aus pices of the Department. She did not avail hersel

f of any of these s ervices to vi sit her children. Accord ingly, we affirm the judgm ent of the T rial Court an d remand with cost of the a ppeal asses sed to the ap pellant.3 __________________________ Herschel P. Franks, J. CONCUR:

___________________________ Don T. McM urray, J.

___________________________ Charles D. Susano, Jr., J.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 106 (Thursday, June 3, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31481-31482]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13440]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

 [File No. 500-1]


In the Matter of Sintec Co. Ltd.: Order of Suspension of Trading

June 1, 2010.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Sintec Co. Ltd. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the 
period ended December 31, 2001.

[[Page 31482]]

    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the above-listed company. Therefore, it is ordered, 
pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that 
trading in the securities of the above-listed company is suspended for 
the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on June 1, 2010, through 11:59 p.m. EDT 
on June 14, 2010.

    By the Commission.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-13440 Filed 6-1-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONI, Terrance J. Lillis, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D requiredto be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of PrincipalLife Income Fundings Trust 2007-2 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report isincluded in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in thisreport under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement(s) in all material respects; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be includedin this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A. and Bankers Trust Company, N.A.Date: March 27, 2008   /s/ Terrance J. Lillis   Terrance J. Lillis  Chief Financial Officer- Retirement and Investor Services
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,552

EX PARTE TERRANCE RAY SHUN CEPHUS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 0613530A IN THE 297 JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

TH

FROM TARRANT COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two counts of

possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance and sentenced to life imprisonment for each

count, with an affirmative deadly weapon finding. The Second Court of Appeals affirmed his

conviction. Cephus v. State, No. 02-01-251-CR (Tex. App. – Fort Worth, August 22, 2002, pet.

ref’d). 

Applicant contends, inter alia, that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because
2

counsel failed to advise Applicant that he had a right to a jury determination of the deadly weapon

issue even though he elected to have the trial court assess his punishment. Applicant alleges that had

he known that he could submit the deadly weapon issue to the jury, he would have done so rather

than allowing the trial court to made the determination.

After holding a habeas hearing, the trial court has determined that trial counsel was

ineffective in that counsel did not advise Applicant that he was entitled to a jury determination of

the deadly weapon issue, and that such ineffective representation prejudiced Applicant. We find,

therefore, that Applicant is entitled to a hearing before a jury solely to decide the issue of punishment

in Cause No. 0613530A from the 297th Judicial District Court of Tarrant County. 

Delivered: May 11, 2011

Do Not Publish