alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - 14 CFR Part 71
          - [Docket No. FAA-2010-0053; Airspace Docket No. 10-ASO-12]

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

# SUMMARY:

                        This action confirms the effective date of a direct final rule published in the                         **Federal Register**                         April 1, 2010 that establishes Class E Airspace at Quitman Brooks County Airport, Quitman, GA.                    

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         0901 UTC, June 9, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Melinda Giddens, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O. Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404) 305-5610.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Confirmation of Effective Date

                    The FAA published this direct final rule with a request for comments in the                     **Federal Register**                     on April 1, 2010 (75 FR 16333), Docket No. FAA-2010-0053; Airspace Docket No. 10-ASO-12. The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will                           ( print page 32652)                        be no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would become effective on June 3, 2010. No adverse comments were received, and thus this notice confirms that effective date.                

Issued in College Park, Georgia, on May 27, 2010.

Barry A. Knight,

Acting Manager, Operations Support Group Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic Organization.

[FR Doc. 2010-13636 Filed 6-8-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
#### JESSE S. CREECH v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA.

(Filed 10 October, 1945.)

Insurance §§ 30a, 37—

In an action by plaintiff, the insured in a policy of life insurance with defendant, where there are allegations and evidence, *pro*and *con,*as to whether or not the plaintiff paid premiums sufficient to keep the policy in force, the jury answering the issue for defendant, there is no error.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Thompson, J.,*at April Term, 1945, of JOHNSTON. No error.

Civil action on a life insurance policy here on former appeal. *Creech v. Assurance Go.,*224 N. C., 144.

There was verdict and judgment for defendant and plaintiff appealed.

*E. G. Hobbs and Lyon & Lyon for plaintiff, appellant.*

*Abell, Shepard •& Wood and Smith, Wharton ■& Jordan for defendant, appellee.*

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff contends that the insured paid the first annual premium on the policy and in addition paid four quarterly premiums during said year. The defendant contends that the insured, being unable to pay the first annual premium, arranged to convert the policy to a quarterly premium-payment policy. If the facts are as contended by the plaintiff, then the policy, by reason of its extension provisions, was in full force and effect at the time of the death of the insured. If as contended by defendant, it had lapsed. The jury answered the issue in *480favor of the defendant. No prejudicial error is made to appear. The verdict and judgment must stand.

No error.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5438 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5438

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on 
                        indoor tanning services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 10, 2014

Mr. Grimm (for himself and Mr. Peterson) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on 
                        indoor tanning services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Tanning Tax Repeal Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF EXCISE TAX ON INDOOR TANNING SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--Subtitle D of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 
amended by striking chapter 49 and by striking the item relating to 
such chapter in the table of chapters of such subtitle.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to services performed after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - 14 CFR Part 71
          - [Docket No. FAA-2009-0705; Airspace Docket No. 09-ASO-25]

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

# SUMMARY:

                        This action confirms the effective date of a direct final rule published in the                         **Federal Register**                         September 14, 2009 that establishes Class E Airspace at Harvey Point Defense Testing Activity, Hertford, NC.                    

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         0901 UTC, January 27, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Melinda Giddens, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O. Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404) 305-5610.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Confirmation of Effective Date

                    The FAA published this direct final rule with a request for comments in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 14, 2009 (74 FR 46892), Docket No. FAA-2009-0705; Airspace Docket No. 09-ASO-25. The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would become effective on December 17, 2009. No adverse comments were received, and thus this notice confirms that effective date.                

Issued in College Park, Georgia, on January 14, 2010.

Myron A. Jenkins,

Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic Organization.

[FR Doc. 2010-1384 Filed 1-26-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CertificationPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 ofTitle 18, United States Code)**

 

 

Pursuant to section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned doeshereby certify that:

 

The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the “Form 10-Q”)of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in theForm10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
|                       | /s/ David M. Thomas                    |   |
|----------------------------|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:  August 5, 2003 | David  M. Thomas                       |
|                       | Chairman  and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

 
|                       | /s/ Nancy E. Cooper                                 |   |
|----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:  August 5, 2003 | Nancy  E. Cooper                                    |
|                       | Senior  Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is notbeing filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toIMS Health Incorporated and will be retained by IMS Health Incorporated andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
No. 85,487

#### In the Matter of W. Fredrick Zimmerman, *Respondent.*

60 P.3d 347

Dated this 31st day of December, 2002.

On March 9, 2001, respondent W. Fredrick Zimmerman was disciplined by suspension for 1 year and ordered to pay the costs of the proceedings and to furnish proof of compliance with Supreme Court Rule 218 (2002 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 279). It was made a condition of his reinstatement to provide proof of current malpractice insurance. See *In re Zimmerman,*270 Kan. 855, 19 P.3d 160 (2001).

On November 26, 2002, respondent filed an affidavit verifying that he has fully complied with the conditions entered by this court on March 9, 2001, and moves the court for an order reinstating him to the practice of law.

The court finds that the motion should be granted and that respondent should be reinstated to the practice of law and discharged from any further obligation in this matter.

It Is Therefore Ordered thatW. Fredrick Zimmerman be and he is hereby reinstated to the practice of law in the State of Kansas.

It Is Further Ordered that this order shall be published in the official Kansas Reports.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5468 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5468

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1103 USPS Building 1103 in Camp Pendleton, California, as the ``Camp 
                Pendleton Medal of Honor Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CAMP PENDLETON MEDAL OF HONOR POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1103 USPS Building 1103 in Camp Pendleton, California, shall 
be known and designated as the ``Camp Pendleton Medal of Honor Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Camp 
Pendleton Medal of Honor Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 17, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5468

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1103 USPS Building 1103 in Camp Pendleton, California, as the ``Camp 
                Pendleton Medal of Honor Post Office''.
```
lasalle logo
              
              
              LaSalle Bank
      N.A.
                135 South
      LaSalle Street
                Suite
      1625
                Chicago,
      IL  60603
                
                Global Securities and Trust
      Services


Annual
Statement of Compliance





VIA:
EMAIL





Merrill
Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc.


250 Vesey
Street


4 World
Financial Center, 16th Floor


New York,
New York 10080


Attention:
            Merrill
      Lynch Mortgage Investors Trust, Series
2007-SL1








Re:
            Pursuant
      to the Indenture (the "Agreement") dated as of May 11, 2007 among Merrill
      Lynch Mortgage Investors Trust, Series 2007-SL1, as Issuing Entity,
      LaSalle Bank National Association, as Securities Administrator, and
      Citibank, N.A., as Indenture Trustee, relating to Merrill Lynch Mortgage
      Investors Trust, Series 2007-SL1





I,
Barbara L. Marik, a Senior Vice President of LaSalle Bank National Association,
as Securities Administrator hereby certify that:




1. A review
of the activities of the Securities Administrator during the preceding calendar
year and of the performance of the Securities Administrator under the Agreement
has been made under my supervision; and




2. To the
best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Securities Administrator has
fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout such year or a portion thereof.











Date:
February 27, 2008





LaSalle
Bank National Association, as Securities Administrator








/s/
Barbara L. Marik


Barbara
L. Marik


Senior
Vice President
-1-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

for the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION,

- and -

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY,

Debtors. 

☐ Affects PG&E Corporation

☐ Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company

☒ Affects both Debtors

* All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case, No.

19-30088 (DM).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Bankruptcy Case

No. 19-30088-DM

Chapter 11 

Jointly Administered

AMENDED CERTIFICATION FOR DIRECT APPEAL TO COURT OF APPEALS

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d)(2) the court, acting on its own motion, certifies for direct 

appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Memorandum Decision on 

Applicability of Inverse Condemnation entered on the docket on November 27, 2019 (Dkt.

#4895), and its accompanying order entered on December 3, 2019. 

Signed and Filed: December 3, 2019

________________________________________

DENNIS MONTALI

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

Entered on Docket 

December 03, 2019

EDWARD J. EMMONS, CLERK 

U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4967 Filed: 12/03/19 Entered: 12/03/19 17:20:39 Page 1 of

2
-2-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

for the Northern District of California

As required by Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8006(b) and (e)(1), this Amended Certification is 

accompanied by the Court’s Amended Memorandum Regarding Certification For Direct Appeal 

To Court Of Appeals containing the information required by Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8006(f)(2)(A)-

(D). 

***END OF AMENDED CERTIFICATION*** 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4967 Filed: 12/03/19 Entered: 12/03/19 17:20:39 Page 2 of

2
*This matter is being decided by a quorum. 28 U.S.C. §

46(d).

 

** Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-20327 

Conference Calendar

 

JAMES EDWARD FLOWERS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JAMES A. COLLINS ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:96-CV-2130

- - - - - - - - - -

February 11, 1999

Before BARKSDALE and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.*

PER CURIAM:**

James Edwards Flowers, Texas prisoner # 588411, appeals the

district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action

for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Flowers argues that the main legal issue in

his appeal concerns his allegations that he was denied due

process in his disciplinary proceeding. He contends that the 
No. 98-20327

-2-

district court did not give him the opportunity to amend his

complaint or to conduct discovery.

Flowers’ claim of a denial of due process at the

disciplinary proceeding is not yet cognizable in a § 1983 action. 

Edwards v. Balisok, 117 S. Ct. 1584, 1588-89 (1997). Thus, there

was no need for discovery or an opportunity to amend the

complaint to allege additional facts. The district court did not

err in dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim. 

Black v. Warren, 134 F.3d 732, 733-34 (5th Cir. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

and find no issue of arguable merit. Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeal as frivolous. 28 U.S.C. § 1915; Howard v. King, 707 F.2d

215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

We caution Flowers that any additional frivolous appeals

filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid

sanctions, Flowers is further cautioned to review any pending

appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are

frivolous because they have been previously decided by this

court.

APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of CX2 Technologies, Inc., a Florida corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies that:

To my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: December 12,, 2007





/s/ Adam Reiser

_______________________________________

Adam Reiser

Chief Executive Officer, President, Principal Executive,

Financial and Accounting Officer and

Chairman of the Board of Directors
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet and statement of operations found on pages 3 and 5 of the company's Form
10Q for the year-to-date.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                                 0
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                        2,064,504
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                          2,045,054
<EQUITIES>                                     142,935
<MORTGAGE>                                     906,055
<REAL-ESTATE>                                   99,843
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               3,459,063
<CASH>                                         151,695
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,765,193
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              2,132,337
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                   3,659
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        1,808,381
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,900
<OTHER-SE>                                     594,592
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,759,294
<PREMIUMS>                                     617,756
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             72,076
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 240
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  18,967
<BENEFITS>                                     624,015
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            48,954
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 36,068
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (405)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             36,473
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    36,473
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3906 Filed: 09/17/19 Entered: 09/17/19 11:00:20 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3906 Filed: 09/17/19 Entered: 09/17/19 11:00:20 Page 2 of

2