alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Initial Review Group; Pediatrics Subcommittee.                     

*Date:*                         June 24, 2010.                     

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                     

*Place:*                         Legacy Hotel and Meeting Center, 1775 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Rita Anand, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-1487,                         *anandr@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 26, 2010. 

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-13483 Filed 6-3-10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BAKER 

&

HOSTETLER LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

 

Robert A. Julian (SBN 88469) 

Cecily A. Dumas (SBN 111449) 

BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP 

600 Montgomery Street, Suite 3100 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: 415.659.2600 

Facsimile: 415.659.2601 

Email: rjulian@bakerlaw.com 

Email: cdumas@bakerlaw.com 

Eric E. Sagerman (SBN 155496) 

Lauren T. Attard (SBN 320898) 

BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP 

11601 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1400 

Los Angeles, CA 90025 

Telephone: 310.442.8875 

Facsimile: 310.820.8859 

Email: esagerman@bakerlaw.com 

Email: lattard@bakerlaw.com 

Counsel for Official Committee of Tort Claimants

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION 

-andPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY,

 Debtors

 Case No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Chapter 11 

(Lead Case) 

(Jointly Administered) 

Ƒ Affects PG& E Corporation 

Ƒ Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company 

Ŷ Affects both Debtors 

*All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case, 

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5248 Filed: 01/02/20 Entered: 01/02/20 13:10:54 Page 1 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5248 Filed: 01/02/20 Entered: 01/02/20 13:10:54 Page 2 of

3
(;+,%,7$

1RWLFH3DUWLHV6HUYLFH/LVW

6HUYHGDVVHWIRUWKEHORZ

^Z/Wd/KE ED EKd/ED Z^^ D/>

Dd,KK&

^Zs/

ŽƵŶƐĞůƚŽĞďƚŽƌƐ tĞŝů͕'ŽƚƐŚĂůΘDĂŶŐĞƐ>>W

ƚƚŶ͗^ƚĞƉŚĞŶ<ĂƌŽƚŬŝŶ͕ZĂĐŚĂĞů&ŽƵƐƚ͕:ĞƐƐŝĐĂ>ŝŽƵ͕DĂƚƚŚĞǁ'ŽƌĞŶ

ϳςϳ&ŝĨƚŚǀĞŶƵĞEĞǁzŽƌŬ͕EzϭϬϭρϯͲϬϭϭε

ƐƚĞƉŚĞŶ͘ŬĂƌŽƚŬŝŶΛǁĞŝů͘ĐŽŵƌĂĐŚĂĞů͘ĨŽƵƐƚΛǁĞŝů͘ĐŽŵũĞƐƐŝĐĂ͘ůŝŽƵΛǁĞŝů͘ĐŽŵŵĂƚƚŚĞǁ͘ŐŽƌĞŶΛǁĞŝů͘ĐŽŵ ŵĂŝů

ŽƵŶƐĞůƚŽĞďƚŽƌƐ <ĞůůĞƌΘĞŶǀĞŶƵƚƚŝ>>W ƚƚŶ͗dŽďŝĂƐ<ĞůůĞƌ͕:ĂŶĞ<ŝŵ

ςρϬĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕^ƵŝƚĞϭεϬϬ

^ĂŶ&ƌĂŶĐŝƐĐŽ͕εκϭϬΘ

ƚŬĞůůĞƌΛŬĞůůĞƌďĞŶǀĞŶƵƚƚŝ͘ĐŽŵũŬŝŵΛŬĞůůĞƌďĞŶǀĞŶƵƚƚŝ͘ĐŽŵ ŵĂŝů

ĞďƚŽƌƐ

W'ΘŽƌƉŽƌĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚWĂĐŝĨŝĐ'ĂƐĂŶĚůĞĐƚƌŝĐŽŵƉĂŶLJ ƚƚŶ͗:ĂŶĞƚ>ŽĚƵĐĂ

ϳϳĞĂůĞ^ƚƌĞĞƚW͘K͘ŽdžϳϳϬϬϬϬ^ĂŶ&ƌĂŶĐŝƐĐŽ͕εκϭϬρ &ŝƌƐƚůĂƐƐDĂŝů

KĨĨŝĐĞŽĨƚŚĞhŶŝƚĞĚ^ƚĂƚĞƐdƌƵƐƚĞĞ KĨĨŝĐĞŽĨƚŚĞhŶŝƚĞĚ^ƚĂƚĞƐdƌƵƐƚĞĞ

ƚƚŶ͗:ĂŵĞƐ>͘^ŶLJĚĞƌ͕ƐƋ͘ΘdŝŵŽƚŚLJ>ĂĨƌĞĚĚŝ͕ƐƋ

κρϬ'ŽůĚĞŶ'ĂƚĞǀĞŶƵĞρƚŚ&ůŽŽƌ͕^ƵŝƚĞηϬρͲϬϭρϯ^ĂŶ&ƌĂŶĐŝƐĐŽ͕εκϭϬϮ

:ĂŵĞƐ͘>͘^ŶLJĚĞƌΛƵƐĚŽũ͘ŐŽǀƚŝŵŽƚŚLJ͘Ɛ͘ůĂĨĨƌĞĚŝΛƵƐĚŽũ͘ŐŽǀ

ŵĂŝů

ŽƵŶƐĞůĨŽƌƚŚĞKĨĨŝĐŝĂůŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞŽĨhŶƐĞĐƵƌĞĚƌĞĚŝƚŽƌƐ DŝůďĂŶŬ>>W

ƚƚŶ͗ĞŶŶŝƐ&͘ƵŶŶĞ͕^ĂŵƵĞů͘<ŚĂůŝů

ρρ,ƵĚƐŽŶzĂƌĚƐEĞǁzŽƌŬ͕EzϭϬϬϬϭͲϮϭςϯ

ĚĚƵŶŶĞΛŵŝůďĂŶŬ͘ĐŽŵƐŬŚĂůŝůΛŵŝůďĂŶŬ͘ĐŽŵ ŵĂŝů

ŽƵŶƐĞůĨŽƌƚŚĞKĨĨŝĐŝĂůŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞŽĨhŶƐĞĐƵƌĞĚƌĞĚŝƚŽƌƐ DŝůďĂŶŬ>>W

ƚƚŶ͗WĂƵů^͘ƌŽŶnjŽŶ͕'ƌĞŐŽƌLJ͘ƌĂLJ͕dŚŽŵĂƐZ͘<ƌĞůůĞƌ

ϮϬϮεĞŶƚƵƌLJWĂƌŬ͕ϯϯƌĚ&ůŽŽƌ>ŽƐŶŐĞůĞƐ͕εϬϬςϳ

WĂƌŽŶnjŽŶΛŵŝůďĂŶŬ͘ĐŽŵ'ďƌĂLJΛŵŝůďĂŶŬ͘ĐŽŵd<ƌĞůůĞƌΛŵŝůďĂŶŬ͘ĐŽŵ ŵĂŝů

&ĞĞdžĂŵŝŶĞƌ ƚƚŶ͗ƌƵĐĞ͘DĂƌŬĞůů

ρκϭE͘&ĂŝƌďĂŶŬƐŽƵƌƚ͕^ƵŝƚĞϮϮϬϬŚŝĐĂŐŽ͕/>ςϬςϭϭͲϯϳϭϬ

ďĂŵĞdžĂŵƉŐĞΛŐŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵƉŐĞΛůĞŐĂůĚĞĐŽĚĞƌ͘ĐŽŵƚƌĂĐĞLJƌŐĂůůĞŐŽƐΛŐŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵ ŵĂŝů

ŽƵŶƐĞůƚŽ&ĞĞdžĂŵŝŶĞƌ ^ĐŽƚƚ,͘DĐEƵƚƚ ^ĐŽƚƚ,͘DĐEƵƚƚ

ϯϮκtĂƌƌĞŶZŽĂĚ^ĂŶDĂƚĞŽ͕εκκϬϮ ƐŵĐŶƵƚƚΛŵůͲƐĨ͘ĐŽŵ ŵĂŝů

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5248 Filed: 01/02/20 Entered: 01/02/20 13:10:54 Page 3 of

3
#### STATE v. JAMES McLEAN, Alias JACK McLEAN.

(Filed 29 November, 1944.)

Burglary and Unlawful Breakings §§ lb, 10—

In a prosecution for burglary in tbe first degree, the jury has the right to render a verdict of guilty of burglary in the second degree, even though the jury may find facts sufficient to constitute first degree burglary, and failure of the judge to so instruct the jury is reversible error.

Appeal by defendant from *Phillips, J.,*at August Term, 1944, of SCOTLAND.

Criminal prosecution tried upon indictment charging burglary in the first degree.

Verdict: Guilty of burglary in the first degree. Judgment: Death by asphyxiation. Defendant appeals, assigning errors.

*Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorneys-General Rhodes and Moody for the State.*

*W. II. Gox and Varser, McIntyre & Henry for defendant.*

*705DeNNy, J.

Tbe defendant excepts and assigns as error tbe following portion of bis Honor’s charge: “You may render one of three verdicts— first, guilty of burglary in tbe first degree as charged; second, guilty of a non-burglarious breaking and entry of tbe dwelling bouse of another as charged; third, not guilty.”

The defendant contends that the trial judge committed error in failing to instruct the jury that they might return a verdict of guilty of burglary in the second degree if they deemed it proper so to do, even though the facts found by them be sufficient to constitute burglary in the first degree as defined by statute. The defendant is relying upon the provisions of G. S., 15-171, formerly C. S., 4641, as amended by chapter 7, Public Laws 1941, which read as follows: “When the crime charged in the bill of indictment is burglary in the first degree the jury, upon the finding of facts sufficient to constitute burglary in the first degree as defined by statute, may elect to render a verdict of guilty of burglary in the second degree if they deem it proper so to do. The judge in his charge shall so instruct the jury.”

The above statute was amended after the decision in the case of *S. v. Johnson,*218 N. C., 604, 12 S. E. (2d), 278, and we think it gives to the jury the right to render a verdict of guilty of burglary in the second degree when the crime charged in the bill of indictment is burglary in the first degree, even though the jury may find facts sufficient to constitute burglary in the first degree as defined by statute. Therefore, in such cases a defendant is entitled as a matter of right, to have the jury instructed that it may elect to render a verdict of guilty of burglary in the second degree if they deem it proper so to do. The exception is well taken and must be sustained.

We deem it unnecessary to discuss the other assignments of error, since they may not arise upon another trial.

For the reason stated, there must be a

New trial.
Project Category and Billing Category Hours

PG&E Corporation, et al. (Case No. 19-30088 (DM))

For the Period July 1, 2019 through July 31, 2019

Summary by Project Category and Billing Category

Total 

Compensation

Exhibit A

PwC LLP - Management, Tax and Advisory Consultants to the Debtors

Fixed Fee Services

North Bay & Camp Fire Services Retention Exhibit #: SUPP 01-A; 01-D

North Bay & Camp Fire Services - C.O. #10 & C.O. #1 11,662.70 $3,610,000.00

Subtotal - North Bay & Camp Fire Services 11,662.70 $3,610,000.00

Internal Audit Assessment Services Retention Exhibit #: 01-F

Internal Audit Assessment Services 10.50 $12,600.00

Subtotal - Internal Audit Assessment Services 10.50 $12,600.00

IT Implementation Services Retention Exhibit #: 01-G

IT Implementation Services 751.00 $90,000.00

Subtotal - IT Implementation Services 751.00 $90,000.00

Subtotal - Hours and Compensation - Fixed Fee Services 12,424.20 $3,712,600.00

Hourly Services

Rate Case Support Services Retention Exhibit #: 01-L; SUPP 01-J

Rate Case Support Services 1,022.10 $302,880.00

Subtotal - Rate Case Support Services 1,022.10 $302,880.00

Wildfire Mitigation Plan Support Services Retention Exhibit #: SUPP 01-U

WMP Support Services 47.50 $16,637.50

Subtotal - Wildfire Mitigation Plan Support Services 47.50 $16,637.50

Regulatory Inquiry Assistance Services Retention Exhibit #: SUPP 03

Document Review 238.00 $135,541.10

Document Follow-Up 8.20 $3,601.60

Interview Prep 18.50 $10,383.10

Interviews 25.10 $16,982.40

Interview Debrief 4.80 $3,156.00

Accrual Analysis and Reconciliation 373.50 $140,345.70

Disclosure Analysis and Reconciliation 85.60 $34,720.20

FAS 5 Analysis and Reconciliation 15.80 $12,295.70

Meetings with Counsel 42.90 $29,896.90

Internal Meetings/Status Updates 140.80 $69,769.30

Strategy - Approach and Execution 24.20 $13,305.30

Other 9.70 $5,134.50

Subtotal - Regulatory Inquiry Assistance Services 987.10 $475,131.80

Subtotal - Hours and Compensation - Hourly Services 2,056.70 $794,649.30

Monday, December 30, 2019

Page 1 of 2

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5228-1 Filed: 12/31/19 Entered: 12/31/19 09:40:45 Page 1

of 2
Project Category and Billing Category Hours

PG&E Corporation, et al. (Case No. 19-30088 (DM))

For the Period July 1, 2019 through July 31, 2019

Summary by Project Category and Billing Category

Total 

Compensation

Exhibit A

PwC LLP - Management, Tax and Advisory Consultants to the Debtors

Case Administration

Bankruptcy Requirements and Other Court Obli Retention Exhibit #: CASE

Employment Applications and Other Court Filings 18.00 $9,900.00

Monthly, Interim and Final Fee Applications 46.50 $18,165.00

Subtotal - Bankruptcy Requirements and Other Court Obligations 64.50 $28,065.00

Subtotal - Hours and Compensation - Case Administration 64.50 $28,065.00

Total - Hours and Compensation Sought for Reimbursement 14,545.40 $4,535,314.30

Monday, December 30, 2019

Page 2 of 2

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5228-1 Filed: 12/31/19 Entered: 12/31/19 09:40:45 Page 2

of 2
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5468 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2014 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1103 USPS Building 1103 in Camp Pendleton, California, as the ‘‘Camp Pendleton Medal of 

Honor Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5468 RFS

1 SECTION 1. CAMP PENDLETON MEDAL OF HONOR POST OF2 FICE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 1103 USPS Building 1103 in 

5 Camp Pendleton, California, shall be known and des6 ignated as the ‘‘Camp Pendleton Medal of Honor Post Of7 fice’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Camp Pendleton 

12 Medal of Honor Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 17, 

2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Patrick C. O’Rourke, Appellant, v. Margaretha Hanchett, Respondent.

Exceptions overruled and judgment ordered upon verdict, with costs.

Per Curiam:

Although the record in this case contains no evidence of an absolute promise to pay, yet if it did, it not appearing that such promise was made with full knowledge of the fact that the defendant had not been charged as indorser, it would he insufficient to create a liability. *(Myer*v. Hibsher, 47 N. Y. 265.) The rule laid down in that case is as follows: “A promise, to work a waiver, mustbe made with full knowledge of all the facts.” The exceptions should be overruled and judgment ordered upon the verdict with costs.

Present — Van Brunt, P. J., O’Brien and Parker, JJ.
---

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC 
ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors
Energy Fuels Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-205182, 333-194900) on Form S-8 and (No. 333-203996) on Form F-4/A
(amendment No. 1) of Energy Fuels Inc. of our report dated March 14, 2016, with
respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Energy Fuels Inc. as of December
31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, and the related consolidated statements of
operations and comprehensive loss, changes in shareholders equity and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2015,
which report appears in the December 31, 2015 annual report on Form 10-K of
Energy Fuels Inc.

/s/ KPMG LLP
Chartered Professional Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants
March 15, 2016 
Toronto, Canada



| | KPMG LLP is a Canadian
    limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG 
    network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International
    Cooperative 
    (KPMG International), a Swiss entity. | 
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 

---
EXHIBIT
      32





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**








In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Summit Environmental
      Corporation, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31,
      2005 (the “Report”), I, B. Keith Parker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
      hereby certify that to my knowledge:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78o(d)); and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: July
      28, 2005


*/s/
      B. Keith Parker*


B.
      Keith
      Parker


Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer








The
      above
      certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB
      or as a separate disclosure document.
#### Albertina Heckel, Administratrix, etc., Appellant, v. The New York and Sea Beach Railway Company, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
NUMBER 13-08-00390-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

BENIGNO CERDA, JR. AND FRANCISCO CERDA, Appellants,

v.

COASTAL KING, LTD., Appellee.

On appeal from the 370th District Court 

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on appellee’s motion to dismiss appeal. Appellants,

Benigno Cerda, Jr. and Franscisco Cerda, attempted to perfect an appeal from an order

granting summary judgment and entering death penalty sanctions (“summary judgment

order”) entered by the 370th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number
2

C-1930-06-G(1). On January 22, 2008, the trial court signed a summary judgment order

disposing of all claims and causes of action against appellants. Appellants failed to timely

file a motion for new trial or motion to modify judgment within thirty days after the summary

judgment order was signed. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 329b(a). On February 22, 2008,

appellants filed an untimely motion to modify the judgment. On May 20, 2008, the trial

court signed a second order granting summary judgment and entering death penalty

sanctions. The trial court’s plenary power in this matter expired on February 21, 2008.

See Tex. R. Civ. P. 329b(d). Accordingly, any orders or judgments entered after that date

are void. Appellants filed a notice of appeal from the May 20, 2008, modified order on

June 19, 2008. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellants’ notice of appeal was due on

February 21, 2008, but was not filed until June 19, 2008. 

On July 10, 2008, the Clerk of this Court sent notice of this defect so that steps

could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellants were advised that, if

the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court’s letter,

the appeal would be dismissed. Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss indicating this Court

does not have jurisdiction. To date, no response has been received from appellants in

regards to the Court’s letter or appellee’s motion to dismiss. 

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, hereby

GRANTS appellee’s motion to dismiss. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR

WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 16th day of April, 2009.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3615 Filed: 08/20/19 Entered: 08/20/19 14:54:58 Page 1 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3615 Filed: 08/20/19 Entered: 08/20/19 14:54:58 Page 2 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3615 Filed: 08/20/19 Entered: 08/20/19 14:54:58 Page 3 of

3
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________ 

Case No. 5D23-2226

LT Case No. 2019-CF-004011

_____________________________ 

CHRISTIAN VILLALBA-SANTOS, 

Appellant, 

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

_____________________________ 

3.800 appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion 

County. Lisa D. Herndon, Judge. 

Christian Villalba-Santos, Monticello, pro se. 

No Appearance for Appellee. 

December 15, 2023

HARRIS, J.

Christian Villalba-Santos appeals the denial of his Florida 

Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) Motion to Correct Illegal 

Sentence. In that unsworn motion, Appellant makes a fact-based 

challenge to the lawfulness of his conviction. Such a claim is not 

cognizable in a rule 3.800(a) motion and should be raised in a rule 

3.850 motion. See State v. Spella, 567 So. 2d 1051, 1052 (Fla. 5th 

DCA 1990). 
2 

We therefore agree with the trial court’s denial of Appellant’s 

motion. This affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant timely 

seeking the appropriate relief under Florida Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 3.850. See Lewis v. State, 926 So. 2d 437, 438 (Fla. 1st 

DCA 2006). 

AFFIRMED. 

MAKAR, and MACIVER, JJ., concur. 

_____________________________ 

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331. 

_____________________________
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NewEngland Realty Associates Limited Partnership (the “Partnership”) onForm 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ronald Brown, thePresident and a Director of the Partnership’s General Partner,NewReal, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18.U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuantto § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)       The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

 

(2)       The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and result of operations of the Partnership.

 
|                 |                                                                                                                   | /s/ RONALD BROWN |
|----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|
|                 |                                                                                                                   |
|                 |                                                                                                                   |
|                 | Ronald Brown                                                                                                           |
|                 | Principal Executive  Officer  (President and Director of  the Partnership’s General  Partner, NewReal, Inc.) |
|                 |
| August 13, 2004 |

 

----