1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153-0119

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 

Stephen Karotkin (pro hac vice) 

(stephen.karotkin@weil.com) 

Ray C. Schrock, P.C. (pro hac vice) 

(ray.schrock@weil.com) 

Jessica Liou (pro hac vice) 

(jessica.liou@weil.com) 

Matthew Goren (pro hac vice) 

(matthew.goren@weil.com) 

New York, NY 10153-0119 

Tel: (212) 310-8000 

Fax: (212) 310-8007 

KELLER & BENVENUTTI LLP 

Tobias S. Keller (#151445) 

(tkeller@kellerbenvenutti.com) 

Jane Kim (#298192) 

(jkim@kellerbenvenutti.com) 

650 California Street, Suite 1900 

San Francisco, CA 94108 

Tel: (415) 496-6723 

Fax: (415) 636-9251 

Attorneys for Debtors and 

Debtors in Possession 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION, 

 - and - 

Case No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Chapter 11 

(Lead Case) 

(Jointly Administered) 

NOTICE OF AGENDA FOR 

OCTOBER 23, 2019, 10:00 A.M. 

OMNIBUS HEARING 

Date: October 23, 2019 

Time: 10:00 a.m. (Pacific Time) 

Place: United States Bankruptcy Court 

 Courtroom 17, 16th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94102

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, 

 Debtors. 

 Affects PG&E Corporation 

 Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company 

Affects both Debtors 

* All papers shall be filed in the lead case, 

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4382 Filed: 10/22/19 Entered: 10/22/19 12:48:26 Page 1 of

 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153-0119

PROPOSED AGENDA FOR 

OCTOBER 23, 2019, 10:00 A.M. (PACIFIC TIME) 

OMNIBUS HEARING 

I: MATTERS SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD IN MAIN CASE: No. 19-30088 (DM) 

STATUS CONFERENCE 

1. Order Terminating Exclusivity: Order Granting Joint Motion of the Official 

Committee of Tort Claimants and Ad Hoc Committee of Senior Unsecured Noteholders to 

Terminate the Debtors’ Exclusive Periods Pursuant to Section 1121(d)(1) of the Bankruptcy 

Code [Dkt. 4167]. 

A. Debtors’ First Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization 

[Dkt. 3966]. 

B. Order Denying Debtors’ Second Exclusivity Extension Motion 

[Dkt. 4168]. 

C. Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization of Official Committee of Tort 

Claimants and Ad Hoc Committee of Senior Unsecured Noteholders 

[Dkt. 4257]. 

D. Plan Schedule Statement of the Official Committee of Tort Claimants 

[Dkt. 4333]. 

E. Statement of the Ad Hoc Committee of Senior Unsecured Noteholders 

Regarding Status Conference on Competing Plans of Reorganization [Dkt. 

4373]. 

F. Debtors’ Preliminary Response to Plan Scheduling Statement of the 

Official Committee of Tort Claimants [Dkt. 4381]. 

Status: Pursuant to Docket Text Order dated October 9, 2019, the Court will hold 

a status conference regarding the two competing plans. 

CONTESTED MATTERS GOING FORWARD 

2. Subrogation Settlement and RSA Motion: Debtors’ Motion Pursuant to 

11 U.S.C. §§ 363(b) and 105(a) and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 6004 and 9010 for Entry of an Order (I) 

Authorizing the Debtors to Enter into Restructuring Support Agreement with the Consenting 

Subrogation Claimholders, (II) Approving the Terms of Settlement with Such Consenting 

Subrogation Claimholders, Including the Allowed Subrogation Amount, and (III) Granting 

Related Relief [Dkt. 3992]. 

Response Deadline: October 16, 2019, at 4:00 p.m. (Pacific Time). 

Responses Filed: 

A. Limited Objection of California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services 

and California Department of Veterans Affairs to Debtors’ Subrogation 

Settlement and RSA Motion [Dkt. 4220]. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4382 Filed: 10/22/19 Entered: 10/22/19 12:48:26 Page 2 of

 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153-0119

B. Objection of BOKF, NA as Indenture Trustee to Debtors’ Motion 

Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 363(b) and 105(a) and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 6004 

and 9010 for Entry of an Order (I) Authorizing the Debtors to Enter into 

Restructuring Support Agreement with the Consenting Subrogation 

Claimholders, (II) Approving the Terms of Settlement with Such 

Consenting Subrogation Claimholders, Including the Allowed Subrogation 

Amount, and (III) Granting Related Relief [Dkt. 4231]. 

C. Opposition of Official Committee of Tort Claimants to Debtors’ Motion 

Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 363(b) and 105(a) and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 6004 

and 9010 for Entry of an Order (I) Authorizing the Debtors to Enter into 

Restructuring Support Agreement with the Consenting Subrogation 

Claimholders, (II) Approving the Terms of Settlement with Such 

Consenting Subrogation Claimholders, Including the Allowed Subrogation 

Amount, and (III) Granting Related Relief [Dkt. 4232]. 

D. Declaration of David J. Richardson in Support of Opposition of Official 

Committee of Tort Claimants to Debtors’ Motion Pursuant to 

11 U.S.C. §§ 363(b) and 105(a) and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 6004 and 9010 for 

Entry of an Order (I) Authorizing the Debtors to Enter into Restructuring 

Support Agreement with the Consenting Subrogation Claimholders, (II) 

Approving the Terms of Settlement with Such Consenting Subrogation 

Claimholders, Including the Allowed Subrogation Amount, and (III) 

Granting Related Relief [Dkt. 4235]. 

E. Objection of the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors to the 

Debtors’ Subrogation Settlement and RSA Motion [Dkt. 4236]. 

F. Objection of the United States of America to Debtors’ Motion Pursuant to 

11 U.S.C. §§ 363(b) and 105(a) and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 6004 and 9010 for 

Entry of an Order (I) Authorizing the Debtors to Enter into Restructuring 

Support Agreement with the Consenting Subrogation Claimholders, (II) 

Approving the Terms of Settlement with Such Consenting Subrogation 

Claimholders, Including the Allowed Subrogation Amount, and (III) 

Granting Related Relief [Dkt. 4237]. 

G. The Adventist Claimants’ Objection to the Debtors’ Motion Pursuant to 

11 U.S.C. §§ 363(b) and 105(a) and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 6004 and 9010 for 

Entry of an Order (I) Authorizing the Debtors to Enter into Restructuring 

Support Agreement with the Consenting Subrogation Claimholders, (II) 

Approving the Terms of Settlement with Such Consenting Subrogation 

Claimholders, Including the Allowed Subrogation Amount, and (III) 

Granting Related Relief [Dkt. 4239]. 

H. Objection of the Ad Hoc Committee of Senior Unsecured Noteholders to 

Debtors’ Motion to Enter into Restructuring Support Agreement with the 

Consenting Subrogation Claimholders [Dkt. 4241]. 

I. Ad Hoc Group of Subrogation Claim Holders’ Reply in Support of 

Debtors’ Motion Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 363(b) and 105(a) and Fed. R. 

Bankr. P. 6004 and 9010 for Entry of an Order (I) Authorizing the Debtors 

to Enter into Restructuring Support Agreement with the Consenting 

Subrogation Claimholders, (II) Approving the Terms of Settlement with 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4382 Filed: 10/22/19 Entered: 10/22/19 12:48:26 Page 3 of

 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153-0119

Such Consenting Subrogation Claimholders, Including the Allowed 

Subrogation Amount, and (III) Granting Related Relief [Dkt. 4348]. 

J. Declaration of Benjamin P. McCallen in Support of Ad Hoc Group of 

Subrogation Claim Holders’ Reply in Support of Debtors’ Motion 

Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 363(b) and 105(a) and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 6004 

and 9010 for Entry of an Order (I) Authorizing the Debtors to Enter into 

Restructuring Support Agreement with the Consenting Subrogation 

Claimholders, (II) Approving the Terms of Settlement with Such 

Consenting Subrogation Claimholders, Including the Allowed Subrogation 

Amount, and (III) Granting Related Relief [Dkt. 4348-1]. 

K. Declaration of Homer Parkhill in Support of the Ad Hoc Group of 

Subrogation Claim Holders’ Statement in Support of the Subrogation 

Settlement and RSA Motion [Dkt. 4348-2]. 

L. The Baupost Group, L.L.C.’s Joinder in the Ad Hoc Group of Subrogation 

Claim Holders’ Reply in Support of Debtors’ Motion Pursuant to 

11 U.S.C. §§ 363(b) and 105(a) and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 6004 and 9010 for 

Entry of an Order (I) Authorizing the Debtors to Enter into Restructuring 

Support Agreement with the Consenting Subrogation Claimholders, (II) 

Approving the Terms of Settlement with Such Consenting Subrogation 

Claimholders, Including the Allowed Subrogation Amount, and (III) 

Granting Related Relief [Dkt. 4365]. 

M. Joinder of Certain PG&E Shareholders to the Debtors’ Reply in Support 

of Subrogation Claims Settlement and RSA Motion [Dkt. 4367].

N. Joinder by TURN in Objections and Opposition to Debtors’ Motion 

Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 363(b) and 105(a) and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 6004 

and 9010 for Entry of an Order (I) Authorizing the Debtors to Enter into 

Restructuring Support Agreement with the Consenting Subrogation 

Claimholders, (II) Approving the Terms of Settlement with Such 

Consenting Subrogation Claimholders, Including the Allowed Subrogation 

Amount, and (III) Granting Related Relief [Dkt. 4377]. 

Related Documents: 

O. Declaration of Jason P. Wells in Support of Debtors’ Motion Pursuant to 

11 U.S.C. §§ 363(b) and 105(a) and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 6004 and 9010 for 

Entry of an Order (I) Authorizing the Debtors to Enter into Restructuring 

Support Agreement with the Consenting Subrogation Claimholders, (II) 

Approving the Terms of Settlement with Such Consenting Subrogation 

Claimholders, Including the Allowed Subrogation Amount, and (III) 

Granting Related Relief [Dkt. 3993]. 

P. Debtors’ Reply in Support of Subrogation Claims Settlement and RSA 

Motion [Dkt. 4339]. 

Status: This matter is going forward on a contested basis. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4382 Filed: 10/22/19 Entered: 10/22/19 12:48:26 Page 4 of

 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153-0119

3. Baker & Hostetler Employment Scope Application: Application of the Official 

Committee of Tort Claimants for Entry of an Order (I) Confirming the Scope of Employment of 

Baker & Hostetler LLP, or Alternatively (II) Amending the Order Approving Application of the 

Official Committee of Tort Claimants Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1103 and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2014 

and 5002, for an Order Authorizing Retention and Employment of Baker & Hostetler LLP, 

Effective as of February 15, 2019 (Doc. No. 1331) [Dkt. 4018]. 

Response Deadline: October 15, 2019, at 4:00 p.m. (Pacific Time). 

Responses Filed: 

A. Reservation of Rights of the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors 

Regarding the Retention Order [Dkt. 4207]. 

B. Debtors’ Response and Objection to TCC’s Application to Expand the 

Scope of Baker & Hostetler LLP’s Retention [Dkt. 4210]. 

Related Documents: 

C. Application of the Official Committee of Tort Claimants Pursuant to 

11 U.S.C. § 1103 and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2014 and 5002, for an Order 

Authorizing Retention and Employment of Baker & Hostetler LLP, 

Effective as of February 15, 2019 [Dkt. 934]. 

D. Declaration of Cecily A. Dumas in Support of the Application of the 

Official Committee of Tort Claimants Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1103 and 

Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2014 and 5002, for an Order Authorizing Retention and 

Employment of Baker & Hostetler LLP, Effective as of February 15, 2019

[Dkt. 935]. 

E. Declaration of Karen M. Lockhart in Support of the Application of the 

Official Committee of Tort Claimants Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1103 and 

Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2014 and 5002, for an Order Authorizing Retention and 

Employment of Baker & Hostetler LLP, Effective as of February 15, 2019

[Dkt. 936]. 

F. Verified Statement of Cecily A. Dumas in Support of Application of the 

Official Committee of Tort Claimants for Entry of an Order (I) 

Confirming the Scope of Employment of Baker & Hostetler LLP, or 

Alternatively (II) Amending the Order Approving Application of the 

Official Committee of Tort Claimants Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1103 and 

Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2014 and 5002, for an Order Authorizing Retention and 

Employment of Baker & Hostetler LLP, Effective as of February 15, 2019 

(Doc. No. 1331) [Dkt. 4019]. 

G. Reply in Support of Application of the Official Committee of Tort 

Claimants for Entry of an Order (I) Confirming the Scope of Employment 

of Baker & Hostetler LLP, or Alternatively (II) Amending the Order 

Approving Application of the Official Committee of Tort Claimants 

Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1103 and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2014 and 5002, for an 

Order Authorizing Retention and Employment of Baker & Hostetler LLP, 

Effective as of February 15, 2019 (Doc. No. 1331) [Dkt. 4296]. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4382 Filed: 10/22/19 Entered: 10/22/19 12:48:26 Page 5 of

 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153-0119

Related Orders: 

H. Order Approving Application of the Official Committee of Tort Claimants 

Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1103 and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2014 and 5002, for an 

Order Authorizing Retention and Employment of Baker & Hostetler LLP, 

Effective as of February 15, 2019 [Dkt. 1331]. 

Status: This matter is going forward on a contested basis. 

RESOLVED MATTER 

4. Second Exclusivity Extension Motion: Motion to Extend Exclusivity Period for 

Filing a Chapter 11 Plan and Disclosure Statement Motion of Debtors Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 

section 1121(d) to Further Extend Exclusive Periods Filed by Debtor PG&E Corporation

[Dkt. 4005]. 

Response Deadline: October 16, 2019, at 4:00 p.m. (Pacific Time). 

Responses Filed: No responses were filed. 

Related Documents: 

A. Declaration of John Boken in Support of Motion of Debtors Pursuant to 11 

U.S.C. section 1121(d) to Further Extend Exclusive Periods [Dkt. 4007]. 

Related Orders: 

B. Order Denying Debtors’ Second Exclusivity Extension Motion 

[Dkt. 4168]. 

Status: This Motion was denied [Dkt. 4168] and taken off calendar by Docket 

Text Order on October 9, 2019. 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that copies of any pleadings filed with the Court and 

referenced herein can be viewed and/or obtained: (i) by accessing the Court’s website at 

http://www.canb.uscourts.gov, (ii) by contacting the Office of the Clerk of the Court at 450 

Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102, or (iii) from the Debtors’ notice and claims 

agent, Prime Clerk LLC, at https://restructuring.primeclerk.com/pge or by calling (844) 339-

4217 (toll free) for U.S.-based parties; or +1 (929) 333-8977 for International parties or by email at:pgeinfo@primeclerk.com. Note that a PACER password is needed to access documents 

on the Bankruptcy Court’s website. 

Dated: October 22, 2019 WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP

KELLER & BENVENUTTI LLP 

 By: /s/ Jane Kim 

 Jane Kim 

 

Attorneys for Debtors and Debtors in Possession 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4382 Filed: 10/22/19 Entered: 10/22/19 12:48:26 Page 6 of

 6