alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Notice Recipients

District/Off: 0971−3 User: bgapuz Date Created: 8/21/2019

Case: 19−30088 Form ID: pdfeoc Total: 3

Recipients submitted to the BNC (Bankruptcy Noticing Center):

db PG&E Corporation 77 Beale Street P.O. Box 770000 San Francisco, CA 94177

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: General Counsel Washington, D.C. 205550001 

PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company Attn: Janet Loduca 77 Beale

Street P.O. Box 770000 San Francisco, CA 94105

TOTAL: 3

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3644-1 Filed: 08/21/19 Entered: 08/21/19 16:26:39 Page 1

of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             702
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,962
<ALLOWANCES>                                       124
<INVENTORY>                                      4,309
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,867
<PP&E>                                           7,670
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,801
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,857
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,773
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           750
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,686
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,857
<SALES>                                         21,355
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,355
<CGS>                                           15,180
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,180
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 253
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    138
<INCOME-TAX>                                         7
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                131
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       131
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1





COPSYNC, INC.





CERTIFICATION OF CORPORATE OFFICERS


(Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of COPsync, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.




April 12, 2010/s/ RUSSELL CHANEYRussell Chaney,Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer





The forgoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 94 (Monday, May 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27556-27557]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11670]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE U.S.

[Public Notice 2010-0011]


Agency Information Collection Activities: Final Collection; 
Comment Request

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the U.S.

ACTION: Submission for OMB Review and Comments Request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Form Title: Report of Premiums Payable for Financial Institutions 
Only (EIB 92-30).
SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank), as a 
part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent 
burden, invites the general public and other Federal Agencies to 
comment on the proposed information collection, as required by the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
    We have made the following changes to this application:
    a. Under ``Obligo Types'' we have added ``Financial Institution'' 
as an option;
    b. Under ``Obligo Types'' we have deleted ``Eximbank Sole Risk'' as 
an option;
    c. Under ``Terms'' we have added ``CAD or SDDP'';
    d. Under ``Terms'' we have deleted ``Sight Payments (non-letter of 
credit)'';
    e. Under ``Terms'' we have changed ``1-60 Days'' to ``1-30 Days'' 
as an option;
    f. Under ``Terms'' we have added ``31-60 Days'' as an option;
    g. Under ``Terms'' we have changed ``61-120 Days'' to ``61-90 
Days'' as an option; and
    h. Under ``Terms'' we have added ``91-120 Days'' as an option.
    Our customers will be able to submit this form on paper or 
electronically. The information collected enables the applicant to 
provide Ex-Im Bank with the information necessary to record custom 
utilization and management prospective insurance liability relative to 
risk premiums received.

DATES: Comments should be received on or before June 16, 2010 to be 
assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted electronically on http://www.regulations.gov or by mail to Office of Management and Budget, 
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 725 17th Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20038 attn: OMB 3048-0021.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Titles and Form Number: EIB 92-30. Report of Premiums Payable for 
Financial Institutions Only.
    OMB Number: 3048-0021.

[[Page 27557]]

    Type of Review: Regular.
    Need and Use: The information collected enables the applicant to 
provide Ex-Im Bank with the information necessary to record custom 
utilization and management prospective insurance liability relative to 
risk premiums received.
    Affected Public: This form affects entities involved in the export 
of U.S. goods and services.
    Annual Number of Respondents: 150.
    Estimated Time per Respondent: 15 minutes.
    Government Annual Burden Hours: 450.
    Frequency of Reporting or Use: Monthly.

Sharon A. Whitt,
Agency Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-11670 Filed 5-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5030 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2014 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 13500 SW 250 Street in Princeton, Florida, 

as the ‘‘Corporal Christian A. Guzman Rivera Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SSpencer on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5030 RFS

1 SECTION 1. CORPORAL CHRISTIAN A. GUZMAN RIVERA 

2 POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 13500 SW 250 Street in Prince5 ton, Florida, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Cor6 poral Christian A. Guzman Rivera Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any references in a law, map, 

8 regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Corporal Christian 

11 A. Guzman Rivera Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 8, 

2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


SSpencer on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
HSBC



                     SERVICER COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE
             PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB UNDER THE
                     SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

       Re: HALO 2007-AR1 (288)

       I, Michael T. Stilb, Senior Vice President of HSBC Mortgage Corp.
(USA) (the "Company"), pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB under the
Securities Act of 1934, as pursuant to the Amended and Restated Purchase,
Warranties and Servicing Agreement, dated as of 05/01/2006 between HSBC Bank
USA) National Association, as Purchaser and HSBC Mortgage Corp. (USA), hereby
certify that:

       1. A review of the activities of the Company from 01/01/2007 through
          December 31, 2007 and of its performance under the Agreement has
          been made under my supervision; and

       2. To the best of my knowledge, based on my review, the Company has
          fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
          respects throughout the reporting period referred to above except
          as set forth below:

                 NONE

       IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this certificate on behalf of the
Company this 29th day of February, 2008.


                                            HSBC Mortgage Corporation (USA)



                                            By:/s/Michael T. Stilb
                                               ----------------------------
                                               Name: Michael T. Stilb
                                               Title: Senior Vice President














HSBC Mortgage Corporation (USA)
2929 Walden Avenue, Depew, NY 14043
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofCarreker Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period endingOctober 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, John D. Carreker, Jr., Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/    JOHN D.  CARREKER, JR. |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
| John D. Carreker, Jr.,  Chief Executive Officer   |

 

 

Dated:             December 11,2003

 

1

----
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4368 Filed: 10/21/19 Entered: 10/21/19 17:41:39 Page 1 of

3
21

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4368 Filed: 10/21/19 Entered: 10/21/19 17:41:39 Page 2 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4368 Filed: 10/21/19 Entered: 10/21/19 17:41:39 Page 3 of

3
#### The Rochester Lamp Company, Appellant, v. John H. Brigham, Respondent.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and defendant ordered to appear for examination. No opinion.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5247 

To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to eliminate the consumptive demand 

exception to prohibition on importation of goods made with convict labor, 

forced labor, or indentured labor, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 29, 2014 

Mr. KIND introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to eliminate the consumptive demand exception to prohibition on importation of 

goods made with convict labor, forced labor, or indentured labor, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5247 IH

1 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF CONSUMPTIVE DEMAND EX2 CEPTION TO PROHIBITION ON IMPORTATION 

3 OF GOODS MADE WITH CONVICT LABOR, 

4 FORCED LABOR, OR INDENTURED LABOR; RE5 PORT. 

6 (a) ELIMINATION OF CONSUMPTIVE DEMAND EX7 CEPTION.— 

8 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 307 of the Tariff 

9 Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1307) is amended by strik10 ing ‘‘The provisions of this section’’ and all that fol11 lows through ‘‘of the United States.’’. 

12 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made 

13 by paragraph (1) shall take effect on the date that 

14 is 15 days after the date of the enactment of this 

15 Act. 

16 (b) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days 

17 after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually 

18 thereafter, the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border 

19 Protection shall submit to the Committee on Finance of 

20 the Senate and the Committee on Ways and Means of the 

21 House of Representatives a report on compliance with sec22 tion 307 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1307) that 

23 includes the following: 

24 (1) The number of instances in which merchan25 dise was denied entry pursuant to that section durVerDate Mar 15 2010 00:16 Aug 01, 2014 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5247.IH H5247

jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5247 IH

1 ing the 1-year period preceding the submission of 

2 the report. 

3 (2) A description of the merchandise denied 

4 entry pursuant to that section. 

5 (3) Such other information as the Commis6 sioner considers appropriate with respect to moni7 toring and enforcing compliance with that section. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Sim

pson

T

h

acher &

B

artlett L

L

P

425 Lexington

A

ve

New

York, N

Y 10

017

Exhibit G 

EXPENSE SUMMARY FOR THE PERIOD 

JANUARY 29, 2019 THROUGH APRIL 30,, 2019 

Expenses Amounts 

Research $6908.51 

Online Research $6144.01 

Document Retrieval $764.50 

Meals $2096.01 

Overtime $1994.89 

Travel $101.12 

Travel $4,461.41 

Airfare $2823.11 

Hotel $1387.64 

Out-of-Town Travel $250.66 

Transportation $1013.43 

Local $254.23 

Overtime Carfare $759.20 

Duplicating $719.19 

Binding $16.42 

Print & Scan $702.77 

Courier and Postage $949.34 

Conferencing/Communication $431.46 

Telephone $42.82 

Conferencing Services $131.14 

Court Call $257.50 

Total Expenses Requested: $16,579.35 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3157-7 Filed: 07/23/19 Entered: 07/23/19 16:36:20 Page 1

of 1
#### In the Matter of Daniel Marconi, Respondent, v Board of Education of Seaford Union Free School District et al., Appellants.

Submitted November 13, 1995;

decided December 28, 1995

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution and is not a nonfinal order of the type within the meaning of CPLR 5602 (a) (2). Motion for leave to supplement the joint record on appeal denied.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanced Battery Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-QSB/A (Amendment No. 1)  for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Zhiguo Fu, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Advanced Battery Technologies, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Advanced Battery Technologies, Inc. as of and for the period covered by the Report.  Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, this certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed. Dated:  June 21, 2007/s/ Zhiguo Fu
Zhiguo Fu 
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit D

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4686-4 Filed: 11/12/19 Entered: 11/12/19 15:50:31 Page 1

of 2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4686-4 Filed: 11/12/19 Entered: 11/12/19 15:50:31 Page 2

of 2
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-50618

Summary Calendar

Candella M. Ledet, 

Plaintiff—Appellant,

versus

Perry Homes, 

Defendant—Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 5:19-CV-712

Before Wiener, Dennis, and Haynes, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Candella Ledet, acting pro se, sued her former employer, Perry 

Homes, under 42 U.S.C. § 1981, alleging that her firing was based upon 

discrimination. Perry Homes served her requests for admissions to which 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 21, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-50618 Document: 00516246576 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/21/2022
No. 21-50562

2

she failed to respond.1 The district court entered an order requiring her to 

respond by a certain date and warning of the repercussions if she failed to do 

so, yet she failed to respond. Perry Homes ultimately filed a motion for 

summary judgment on the deemed admissions, which the district court 

granted. Ledet appealed.

While pro se litigants are given liberal construction in their briefing, 

they are still required to follow the rules of procedure and to brief relevant 

points. Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993). Ledet wholly fails 

to show any error in the district court’s ruling (which adopted the magistrate 

judge’s recommendation opinion) on this point.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 

Ledet’s motion to appoint counsel is DENIED. Her motion to allow 

attachment is also DENIED.

1

 Ledet sent an email referencing the interrogatories sent but not specifically 

referencing the requests for admissions. In the email she stated that the “Interrogatories 

and Discovery” “mostly consist of information that will be in violation of my 5 amendment 

rights.” Such an email is not a proper response and, in any event, requests for admissions 

responses cannot be used against defendants in criminal proceedings, so the Fifth 

Amendment is not a defense to the requests. Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 36(b) (“An admission 

under this rule is not an admission for any other purpose and cannot be used against the 

party in any other proceeding.”). Additionally, this email predated the district court’s 

order to respond.

Case: 21-50618 Document: 00516246576 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/21/2022
#### George Campbell and another, Respondents, v. Robert F. Sloane and another, Appellants, Impleaded, etc.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered before a new referee, with costs and disbursements to appellants to abide the event. Opinion by

O’Brien, J.
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the Annual Report ofRosewind Corporation(the "Company") on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'), I, James B. Wiegand, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2004, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date: October 20, 2009








By:
/s/ James B. WiegandJames B. Wiegand
President
Chief Financial Officer
exv10w10






EXHIBIT 10.10



     In
June 2005, Smith Micro Software, Inc. (the “Company”) entered into
an oral agreement with William W. Smith, Jr., Chief Executive
Officer, pursuant to which the Company agreed to a lifetime payment
of $6,000 annually to Mr. Smith, subject to annual increases of 5% in
connection with his future retirement or registration from employment
from the Company. The agreement provides that the Company may, at our
option, discharge our obligations under the agreement by purchasing a
single premium annuity for the benefit of Mr. Smith, the estimated
cost of which was approximately $150,000. To date, the Company has
not purchased such an annuity.