alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification**


**of**


**Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of VioQuest
      Pharmaceuticals, Inc. do hereby certify that, to the best of his knowledge:





(a)
      the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of VioQuest Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for the quarter
      ended March 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(b)
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of VioQuest Pharmaceuticals,
      Inc.





Date:
                May 13, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Michael BeckerMichael
                Becker
              President
                & Chief Executive OfficerDate:
                May 13, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Brian LenzBrian
                Lenz
              Chief
                Financial Officer
#### Ann Swartwood, Appellant, v. Ezra Woolever and others. Respondents.

Decree of the surrogate of Tompkins county reversed and a *641new trial ordered at the circuit of Tompkins county, with costs of this appeal to abide the final award of costs by the surrogate. Order may be settled by Justice Vann. Opinion by

Vann, J
EXHIBIT 32
                                   ----------

            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE & FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Intercell
International  Corporation for the quarter ended December 31, 2004, I, Kristi J.
Kampmann, Chief Financial Officer of Intercell International Corporation, hereby
certify  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  to  my  knowledge,  that:

     a.   such  Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-QSB  of  Intercell International
          Corporation  for  the  quarter ended December 31, 2004, fully complies
          with  the  requirements  of  section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
          Exchange Act of 1934; and

     b.   the  information  contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
          Intercell  International  Corporation  for  the quarter ended December
          31,  2004,  fairly  presents,  in all material respects, the financial
          condition  and  results  of  operations  of  Intercell  International
          Corporation.




                                        /s/Kristi J. Kampmann
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Kristi J. Kampmann,
                                           Chief Financial Officer


Date:  February  22,  2005


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Intercell International Corporation and will be retained by
Intercell International Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certifications  The undersigned officers certify that this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Advanced Battery Technologies, Inc.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Advanced Battery Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Advanced Battery Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  March 23, 2009 /s/ Zhiguo Fu Zhiguo Fu (Chief Executive Officer)  March 23, 2009 /s/ Guohua Wan Guohua Wan (Chief Financial Officer)
CERTIFICATIONS  I, Wilson Cheung, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of China Multimedia, Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have: (a)         designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b)         designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements, for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; (c)         evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (d)         Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a)         all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b)         any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  Date: December 31, 2007 /s/ Wilson CheungWislon Cheung, President and Chairman
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*Hartford and Connecticut Western Railroad Company, Appellant, v. Mandeville S. Frost, and others, Assessors of Rhinebeck, Respondents.

Order affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Pratt, J.;

Barnard, P. J., not sitting.
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

 

Form 10-Q

 

(MarkOne)

[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TOSECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010

 

or

 

[]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THESECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

For the transition period from _________to _________

 

Commission file number 0-14578

 

 

HCW PENSION REAL ESTATE FUND LIMITEDPARTNERSHIP 

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to befiled by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during thepreceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was requiredto file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements forthe past 90 days.  

[X]Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted onits corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to besubmitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of thischapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that theregistrant was required to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, anaccelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reportingcompany.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “acceleratedfiler” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes __ No   X_
No, 1365, Misc.

*Frank G. Uriell*and *William A. Carey*for petitioner. *Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg*and *Theodore George Gilinsky*for the United States.

#### Kapsalis *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
#### VERNELL JORDAN, Minor, BNF, R. F. JORDAN, v. HERBERT SASSER and LUTHER PRICE. ANNIE MAE JORDAN, Minor, BNF, R. F. JORDAN, v. HERBERT SASSER and LUTHER PRICE. R. F. JORDAN v. HERBERT SASSER and LUTHER PRICE.

(Filed 10 May, 1950.)

Appeal by defendant Price from *Halstead, Special Judge,*January Term, 1950, of Columbus.

No error.

*Powell, Lee & Lee for plaintiffs, appellees.*

*Wm. P. Jones for Luther Price, appellant.*

*98Per Curiam.

The three plaintiffs above named instituted action to recover damages for injury to person and property alleged to have been caused by the negligent operation of a motor truck belonging to defendant Price and driven by defendant Sasser. By consent the cases were consolidated for trial, and there was verdict for plaintiffs. From judgment on the verdict defendant Price appealed.

The only assignment of error brought forward by the appellant is the denial of his motion for judgment of nonsuit. He contends there was no evidence that the operation of the truck on this occasion was authorized by him or in his behalf. However, an examination of the evidence as shown by the record leads us to the conclusion that there was some evidence which when considered in the light most favorable for the plaintiffs *(Nash v. Royster,*189 N.C. 408, 127 S.E. 356) was sufficient to carry the case to the jury. *Gallop v. Clark,*188 N.C. 186, 124 S.E. 145.

No error.
#### Carl George SMITH, Jr., Petitioner-appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-appellee.

No. 14942.

United States Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit.

June 16, 1965.

Carl George Smith, Jr., in pro. per.

Alfred W. Moellering, U. S. Atty., Joseph F. Eichhorn, Asst. U. S. Atty., Fort Wayne, Ind., for respondent-appellee.

Before SCHNACKENBERG, KNOCH and CASTLE, Circuit Judges.

KNOCH, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner, Carl George Smith, Jr., is serving a term of 25 years for violation of Title 18 U.S.C. § 2113(d), bank robbery, after conviction on his plea of guilty. At the time of his plea, he was represented by competent counsel appointed to represent him pursuant to his request made when he first appeared for arraignment. He was repeatedly asked whether his plea was voluntary and whether it was made with full understanding of its significance.

In August, 1963, petitioner filed a motion under Title 28, U.S.C. § 2255, to vacate his sentence on the ground that during interrogation, while he was allegedly being denied advice of counsel, he *506had made a confession which would have been inadmissible in evidence at his trial. At his subsequent arraignmént, when he was represented by counsel, he at first pleaded not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity. After determination of his mental competence to stand trial, he entered a plea of guilty on March 3, 1956. His motion to vacate sentence was denied.

Petitioner has now filed another similar motion on the same grounds urging relief on the basis of the decision in Escobedo v. State of Illinois, 1964, 378 U.S. 478, 84 S.Ct. 1758, 12 L.Ed.2d 977. This motion was also denied and petitioner has appealed to this Court.

In Escobedo, the defendant was convicted after a trial in which the inadmissible statements were nevertheless admitted in evidence. Petitioner was not convicted after a trial but on his own plea of guilty. The fact that, prior to his voluntary plea of guilty, he had made an alleged confession which would not have been admissible and which was never admitted into evidence, presented no basis for vacating his sentence. United States v. Kniess, 7 Cir., 1959, 264 F.2d 353, 356. See also United States v. French, 7 Cir., 1960, 274 F.2d 297, 298; United States ex rel. Staples v. Pate, 7 Cir., 1964, 332 F.2d 531, 533; Harris v. United States, 9 Cir., 1964, 338 F.2d 75, 80.

The decision of the District Court is affirmed.

Affirmed.
#### Isaac Teetsel, Respondent, v. William H. Simmons, Clarence E. Dunham, Charles Mulford and James Williamson, Appellants.

Judgment reversed and a new trial granted, coste to abide the event.

Mem. by Herrick, J.; Putnam, J., dissenting.—

Herrick, J.:

It seems to me that the evidence in this case establishes that the switchboard, upon which the plaintiff was standing at the time of the accident, was placed there to be used for the purposes of a switchboard Only, and not as a part of a passageway for the workmen of one room, or part, of the icehouse to the other; that its occasional use as a passageway by some of the workmen was not in pursuance of any custom or by any authority of the defendants; that the board was reasonably sufficient for the purpose for which, it was intended it should be used, that is, as a switchboard; that the accident happened by reason of the careless act of a fellow-servant while not in the performance of any duty necessary to be performed in the course of his employment. It follows from these conclusions that the judgment should be reversed. Judgment reversed and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event.

Mayham, P. J., concurred.

Putnam, J.

(dissenting): While not very clear about this case it seems to me it was properly submitted to the jury. The admission of defendant Simmons, the statement of defendants’ witness, Bumery, which tended to show that plaintiff was properly on the board, and other evidence in the case, I think, allowed the judge to submit the case to the jury.
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00827-CV

Don BERGER (Former Hondo Police Chief) and Andy Chernak, in His Individual Capacity,

Appellants

v.

James T. HOOTEN,

Appellee

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2008-CI-12856

Honorable Andy Mireles, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 29, 2009

JOINT MOTION TO VACATE AND REMAND GRANTED; VACATED AND REMANDED

The parties have filed a joint motion stating they have fully resolved and settled all issues in

dispute. The parties ask that we vacate the trial court’s judgment and remand the cause to the trial

court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the agreement of the parties. We grant the parties’

motion. The judgment of the trial court is therefore vacated without regard to the merits, and the

cause is remanded to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the agreement of

the parties. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). Costs of appeal are assessed against the party who

incurred them. See id. at 42.1(d). 

PER CURIAM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           4,443
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  147,778
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,360
<INVENTORY>                                     68,168
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               235,655
<PP&E>                                         525,512
<DEPRECIATION>                                 258,952
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 646,814
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          141,760
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,585
<OTHER-SE>                                     240,555
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   646,814
<SALES>                                        716,275
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               716,275
<CGS>                                          625,003
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  653,667
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,645
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,207
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 52,963
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,762
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             36,201
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    36,201
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.41


</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of LDK Solar Co., Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31,
2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jack Lai, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 15, 2012



By:

/s/ Jack LaiJack LaiChief Financial Officer
Project Category and Professional Hours

For the Period May 1, 2019 through May 31, 2019

Exhibit B

Position

PG&E Corporation, et al. (Case No. 19-30088 (DM))

PwC LLP - Management, Tax and Advisory Consultants to the Debtors

Total 

Compensation

Fixed Fee Services - Summary of Hours and Fees by Project and Professional 

Internal Audit Assessment Services Retention Exhibit #: 01-F

Amanda Cicely Herron Partner 22.00

Zachary Alfred Pucheu Director 15.00

Subtotal - Internal Audit Assessment Services 37.00 $21,600.00

Total - Hours and Compensation - Fixed Fee Services 37.00 $21,600.00

Friday, September 27, 2019

Page 1 of 1

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4111-2 Filed: 10/04/19 Entered: 10/04/19 11:11:45 Page 1

of 1
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4796 Filed: 11/18/19 Entered: 11/18/19 14:39:43 Page 1 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4796 Filed: 11/18/19 Entered: 11/18/19 14:39:43 Page 2 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4796 Filed: 11/18/19 Entered: 11/18/19 14:39:43 Page 3 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4796 Filed: 11/18/19 Entered: 11/18/19 14:39:43 Page 4 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4796 Filed: 11/18/19 Entered: 11/18/19 14:39:43 Page 5 of

5
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAII REPORTS OR THE PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-18-0000933

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

ANASTASIA LYTLE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

and

ALAN CARPENTER and SUSAN COURTNEY CARPENTER, Plaintiffs,

v.

AIRBORNE AVIATION, INC.; AIRBORNE AVIATION, LLC;

and CHRISTOPHER KIM, Defendants-Appellees,

and

JOHN DOES 1-10; JANE DOES 1-10; DOE CORPORATIONS 1-10;

DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-10; and DOE ENTITIES 1-10,

Defendants

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

(CIVIL NO. 15-1-0131 JKW)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

(By: Leonard, Presiding Judge, and Hiraoka and Wadsworth, JJ.)

Upon consideration of Plaintiff-Appellant Anastasia

Lytle's motion for reconsideration filed on April 29, 2023, the

papers in support, and the record, it appears that:

(1) Plaintiff-Appellant moves for reconsideration of

the Summary Disposition Order filed on April 20, 2023;

(2) The motion for reconsideration presents no point of

law or fact that this court overlooked or misapprehended. See

Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 40(b).

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-18-0000933

09-MAY-2023

08:30 AM

Dkt. 149 ODMR
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAII REPORTS OR THE PACIFIC REPORTER

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for

reconsideration is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 9, 2023.

/s/ Katherine G. Leonard

Presiding Judge

/s/ Keith K. Hiroka

Associate Judge

/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth

Associate Judge

2
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 103 (Friday, May 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 29995]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13086]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., June 18, 2010.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-13086 Filed 5-26-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP

767 Fifth Avenue

New York, NY 10153-0119

Exhibit D

Period Fees Budgeted 

Under DIP budget

Actual Fees and 

Expenses Sought

May 2019 $3,500,000 $2,385,976.54 

June 2019 $3,500,000 $3,047,232.24 

July 2019 $3,500,000 $3,419,077.94 

August 2019 $3,500,000 $2,655,575.96 

September 2019 $3,500,000 $2,433,533.79 

Total: $17,500,000 $13,941,396.47 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4739-4 Filed: 11/14/19 Entered: 11/14/19 16:36:57 Page 1

of 1