alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the Annual Report ofRosewind Corporation(the "Company") on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'), I, James B. Wiegand, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2004, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date: November 29, 2011








By:
/s/ James B. WiegandJames B. Wiegand

President

Chief Financial Officer
#### John E. Morey, Jr., Respondent, v. The Morning Journal Association, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with teu dollars costs and disbursements.
**EXHIBIT        32.2**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                |                                   |                                  |
|-------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
| September 29,                  2008 |                                        | /s/                Richard McKilligan |
|                                | Richard                McKilligan      |
|                                | Chief                Financial Officer |

----
A95A0495.

#### HENDERSON et al. v. HSI FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

(475 SE2d 721)

Decided September 5, 1996.

*Smith, Gambrell & Russell, David A. Handley, Margaret M. Leveille,*for appellants.

*Cauthorn & Phillips, Thomas E. Cauthorn III, Bruce W. Phillips,*for appellee.

Beasley, Chief Judge.

Division 8 of the decision of the Court of Appeals in *Page v. HSI Financial Svcs.,*218 Ga. App. 283 (461 SE2d 239) (1995), having been reversed by the Supreme Court in *Henderson v. HSI Financial Svcs.,*266 Ga. 844 (471 SE2d 885) (1996), the Court of Appeals judgment in Case No. A95A0495 is hereby vacated and reentered except as to Division 8, and the Supreme Court judgment in *Henderson,*supra, is made the judgment of this Court. Divisions 1 through 7 and Division 9 of our earlier opinion are unaffected by the Supreme Court’s decision and remain extant.

*Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part.*

*Pope, P. J., and Ruffin, J., concur.*
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION and PACIFIC GAS 

AND ELECTRIC COMPANY,

 Debtors 

Chapter 11 

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

(Jointly Administered) 

TRANSFER OF CLAIM OTHER THAN FOR SECURITY 

A CLAIM HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS CASE or deemed filed under 11 U.S.C. § 1111(a). 

Transferee hereby gives evidence and notice pursuant to Rule 3001(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of 

Bankruptcy Procedure of the transfer, other than for security, of the claim referenced in this 

evidence and notice. 

Sierra Trench Protection Rentals and Sales Cherokee Debt Acquisition, LLC 

Name of Transferor Name of Transferee

Claim No: 2163

Debtor: Pacific Gas and Electric Company 

(19-30089) 

Claim Amount: $17,599.50 

Name and Address where notices and payments 

to transferee should be sent: 

Cherokee Debt Acquisition, LLC 

1325 Avenue of the Americas, 28th Floor 

New York, NY 10019 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the information provided in this notice is true and correct 

to the best of my knowledge and belief. 

By: _____________________ Date: July 16, 2019 

Transferee/Transferee’s Agent

Penalty for making a false statement: Fine of up to $500,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years, 

or both. 18 U.S.C. §§ 152 & 3571. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3004 Filed: 07/16/19 Entered: 07/16/19 12:56:47 Page 1 of

2
16

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3004 Filed: 07/16/19 Entered: 07/16/19 12:56:47 Page 2 of

2
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5462 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5462

 To amend title 49, United States Code, to provide for limitations on 
            the fees charged to passengers of air carriers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 15, 2014

 Mr. Hudson (for himself, Mr. McCaul, Mr. Thompson of Mississippi, and 
Mr. Richmond) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 49, United States Code, to provide for limitations on 
            the fees charged to passengers of air carriers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON FEES CHARGED TO PASSENGERS OF AIR CARRIERS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (c) of section 44940 of title 49, 
United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
    ``(c) Limitation on Fee.--
            ``(1) Amount.--Fees imposed under subsection (a)(1) shall 
        be $5.60 per one-way trip in air transportation or intrastate 
        air transportation that originates at an airport in the United 
        States, except that the fee imposed per round trip shall not 
        exceed $11.20.
            ``(2) Definition of round trip.--In this subsection, the 
        term `round trip' means a trip on an air travel itinerary that 
        terminates or has a stopover at the origin point (or co-
        terminal).''.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to a trip in air transportation or intrastate air 
transportation that is purchased on or after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

DEVIN COLEMAN

, §

§ No. 576 , 201 5

Defendant Below

, §

Appellant, § Court Below

— Superior C ourt

§ of the State of Delaware in and

v. § for Kent County

§

STATE OF DELAWARE

, § Cr. ID No s. 1303004663

§ 1303012706

Plaintiff Below

, §

Appellee. §

Submitted: November 10, 2015

Decided: November 16 , 2015

O R D E R

T his 16 th day of November 2015

, it appears to the Court that , on

October 26, 2015, the C lerk issued a notice to show cause, by certified mail,

directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal from a Superior Court

Commissioner’s report and recommendation should not be dismissed for th e

Court’s lack of jurisdiction to consider a criminal inter locutory appeal. T he

appellant has not responded to the notice to show cause within the required

ten

- day period . D ismissal of the appeal is deemed to be unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules

3(b)(2) and 29(b), that th e appea l is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice
Exhibit 12
 Travelport Limited
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
 Year Ended
    
    
    Year Ended
    
    
    Year EndedDecember 31,
    
    
    December 31,
    
    
    December 31,(in $ millions)
    
    2009
    
    
    2008
    
    
    2007Earnings available to cover fixed charges:(Loss) income from continuing operations before income
taxes and equity in losses of investment in Orbitz
Worldwide
    
    
    (775
    )
    
    
    11
    
    
    
    (391
    )Plus: Fixed charges
    
    
    297
    
    
    
    359
    
    
    
    410Earnings available to cover fixed charges
    
    
    (478
    )
    
    
    370
    
    
    
    19Fixed Charges:Interest, including amortization of deferred financing costs
    
    
    287
    
    
    
    347
    
    
    
    398Interest portion of rental payment
    
    
    10
    
    
    
    10
    
    
    
    12Total fixed charges
    
    
    297
    
    
    
    357
    
    
    
    410Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    
    n/a
    
    
    
    1.04
    
    
    
    n/a
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AT APRIL 30, 2000 AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2000 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                          99,976
<SECURITIES>                                     7,071
<RECEIVABLES>                                   62,271
<ALLOWANCES>                                       874
<INVENTORY>                                     87,876
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               259,135
<PP&E>                                         421,919
<DEPRECIATION>                                 174,217
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 565,388
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          111,002
<BONDS>                                        421,022
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (125,005)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   565,388
<SALES>                                        297,361
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               297,361
<CGS>                                          250,245
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  250,245
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,072
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (15)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,804
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,812
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,812
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,812
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 1-Q

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4901-9 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 16:12:26 Page 1

of 9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 91F97E20-60D9-4241-AE26-62166B69F7D0

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4901-9 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 16:12:26 Page 2

of 9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 91F97E20-60D9-4241-AE26-62166B69F7D0











	








Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4901-9 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 16:12:26 Page 3

of 9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 91F97E20-60D9-4241-AE26-62166B69F7D0

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4901-9 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 16:12:26 Page 4

of 9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 91F97E20-60D9-4241-AE26-62166B69F7D0

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4901-9 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 16:12:26 Page 5

of 9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 91F97E20-60D9-4241-AE26-62166B69F7D0

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4901-9 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 16:12:26 Page 6

of 9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 91F97E20-60D9-4241-AE26-62166B69F7D0

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4901-9 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 16:12:26 Page 7

of 9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 91F97E20-60D9-4241-AE26-62166B69F7D0

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4901-9 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 16:12:26 Page 8

of 9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 91F97E20-60D9-4241-AE26-62166B69F7D0

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4901-9 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 16:12:26 Page 9

of 9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4548 Filed: 11/01/19 Entered: 11/01/19 13:46:05 Page 1 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4548 Filed: 11/01/19 Entered: 11/01/19 13:46:05 Page 2 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4548 Filed: 11/01/19 Entered: 11/01/19 13:46:05 Page 3 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4548 Filed: 11/01/19 Entered: 11/01/19 13:46:05 Page 4 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4548 Filed: 11/01/19 Entered: 11/01/19 13:46:05 Page 5 of

5
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5342 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to expeditiously grant privileges 

to members of the Armed Forces who are health care providers to 

provide hospital care and medical services in medical facilities of the 

Department of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 31, 2014 

Mr. HECK of Nevada (for himself, Mr. COLE, Mr. BROOKS of Alabama, Mr. 

AMODEI, Mr. RIBBLE, Mr. KING of New York, and Mr. TIPTON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to expeditiously 

grant privileges to members of the Armed Forces who 

are health care providers to provide hospital care and 

medical services in medical facilities of the Department 

of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘VA Credentialing and 

5 Privileging Improvement Act’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5342 IH

1 SEC. 2. APPROVAL OF CREDENTIALS OF MILITARY PHYSI2 CIANS FOR PURPOSES OF GRANTING PRIVI3 LEGES TO DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AF4 FAIRS MEDICAL FACILITIES. 

5 (a) APPROVAL OF CREDENTIALS.—Not later than 30 

6 days after a request is made by a military health care pro7 vider described in subsection (b) for privileges to provide 

8 hospital care or medical services in a medical facility of 

9 the Department of Veterans Affairs, the Secretary of Vet10 erans Affairs shall approve the credentials of the provider 

11 and grant such privileges, unless the Secretary can show 

12 cause for denying such privileges. 

13 (b) MILITARY HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.—A military 

14 health care provider described in this subsection is a mem15 ber of the Armed Forces who— 

16 (1) is a health care provider; 

17 (2) is serving on active duty in, or in the proc18 ess of being separated from, the Armed Forces; and 

19 (3) is privileged to work in a military treatment 

20 facility. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

JERELLE ANDRE SUMPTER, 

Appellant, 

v. Case No. 5D21-2776 

LT Case Nos. 2013-CF-303605 

2013-CF-304831

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/

Decision filed February 21, 2023

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Volusia County, 

Sandra C. Upchurch, Judge.

Matthew R. McLain, of McLain Law, P.A., 

Longwood, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, 

and Kaylee D. Tatman, Assistant Attorney 

General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EDWARDS, EISNAUGLE and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 25, 2011 

t0418 

Order 

 

April 25, 2011 

142328 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142328 

 COA: 293560 

Washtenaw CC: 09-000046-AR 

AFSHIN JADIDNOURI, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 28, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4617 Filed: 11/08/19 Entered: 11/08/19 11:29:35 Page 1 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4617 Filed: 11/08/19 Entered: 11/08/19 11:29:35 Page 2 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4617 Filed: 11/08/19 Entered: 11/08/19 11:29:35 Page 3 of

3
#### STATE v. JACK JENKINS and STATE-WIDE BAIL, INC.

(Filed 22 September, 1954.)

Appeal by the surety on defendant’s appearance bond from *Morris, J.,*May Term 1954, WilsoN.

Affirmed.

Criminal indictment, heard on motion to vacate or modify judgment absolute entered against the surety on defendant’s appearance bond.

A bill of indictment charging the commission of a felony was returned against the defendant at the October 1953 Term of the Superior Court *602of Wilson County. He was apprehended and executed appearance bond with State-Wide Bail, Inc. as surety. At the December 1953 Term defendant was called and failed to appear, and judgment *nisi*was entered. *Scire facias*returnable on the first day of the May Term was issued 19 March 1954 and served on the surety. Judgment absolute was entered 3 May 1954. The surety appeared and moved to vacate said judgment. The motion was denied and said surety appealed.

*Charles L. Abemethy, Jr., for appellant.*

*Luke Lamb for appellee.*

Peb Cubiam.

The facts in this case are substantially on all fours with the facts in *S. v. Dew, ante,*595, except that the appellant, in a proposed amended answer, alleges, that this defendant was apprehended and returned to the Wilson County jail on 31 March 1954. What is said in that case is controlling here. While the subsequent arrest of the defendant does not, *ipso facto,*discharge the original forfeiture, *Tar Heel Bond Co. v. Krider,*218 N.C. 361. 11 S.E. 2d 291; *S. v. Brown,*218 N.C. 368, 11 S.E. 2d 294, the door is still open to the defendant to appeal to the court for a modification of the judgment absolute for the reason the defendant has been apprehended and surrendered to the Wilson County authorities.

The judgment of the court below is

Affirmed.
#### Elizabeth A. Weeks, Appellant, v. John Wilson and Robert Wilson, Respondents.

Order af*642firmed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements.

Westbrook, J., not acting.
Exhibit 32.2



Certifications



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Keystone Automotive Operations, Inc.
(the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three and nine month periods ended October 1, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                        |  |     |  |                                                     
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 15, 2005 |  | By: |  | /S/ BRYANT P. BYNUM                                 
|                        |  |     |  | Bryant P. Bynum                                     
|                        |  |     |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EXHIBIT B

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4890-2 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 13:24:36 Page 1

of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EXHIBIT B

HOURS BY TASK FOR

FOR THE PERIOD OCTOBER 18, 2019 THROUGH NOVEMBER 17, 2019

TASK DESCRIPTION HOURS

Meetings, Emails, and Telephone Calls with Client and/or Client Attorney 18.50

Internal Client Meetings 7.00

Research and Writing 7.50

Working with the Media 16.00

Communications with External Stakeholders 6.50

TOTAL 55.50

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4890-2 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 13:24:36 Page 2

of 2
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, Matthew A. Engel, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
     required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
     Form 10-K of Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-1, Asset-Backed
     Certificates, Series 2007-1 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under the Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in
     this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
     in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its
     obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
     for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
     assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
     securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
     Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
     have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
     disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
     described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
     10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Wells
    Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee.

    Dated:   March 28, 2008


    /s/ Matthew A. Engel
    Signature

    Senior Vice President /CFO
    (Senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 363 Filed: 02/07/19 Entered: 02/07/19 13:46:40 Page 1 of 2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 363 Filed: 02/07/19 Entered: 02/07/19 13:46:40 Page 2 of 2