alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CEO CERTIFICATION**

** **

I, David M. Thomas, certifythat:

 

1.               I have reviewed this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of IMS Health Incorporated (the “registrant”);

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)          Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)         Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)          Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.                     Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)          Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b)         Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| Date:  November 5, 2004 |
|-------------------------|
|                    |
| By:                     | /s/ David M.  Thomas |   |
|                    | David M.  Thomas |
|                    | Chairman and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2  In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Grand Motion Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ending November 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jim Akrivos, in my capacities set forth below of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   April 10, 2008 /s/ Jim Akrivos Jim Akrivos, President (as Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

      In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Summit
Environmental Corporation, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
ended June 30, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Chris Dellinges, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78o(d)); and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 10, 2004
                                   /s/ Chris Dellinges
                                   ---------------------------------------
                                   Chris Dellinges
                                   Chief Financial Officer


      The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350) and is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.
EX-35.1
AURORA LOAN SERVICES

Owner: None


Depositor:       Structured Asset Securities Corporation
                 Attention: Mortgage Finance LMT 2007-1
                 745 7th Avenue, 7th Floor
                 New York, NY 10019

Master Servicer: Aurora Loan Services LLC
                 Michele Olds
                 10350 Park Meadows Drive
                 Littleton, CO 80124

Trustee:         Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
                 Attention: Kimberly J. Wiggins/ LMT 2007-1
                 9062 Old Annapolis Road
                 Columbia, MD 21045

Securities Admin


Subject:         Annual Officers Certification
Fiscal Year:     2007
Investor Code:   F98
Investor Name:   LMT 2007-1



I, Terry Gentry, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Aurora Loan
Services LLC (the "Servicer"), do certify the following for the Calendar Year
2007:

1. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period beginning on
the cut-off date and ending on December 31,2007 (the reporting period) and of
its performance under the Agreement for such period has been made under my
supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material aspects throughout
such reporting period.

Certified by: AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC

By /s/ Terry L. Gentry
Name: Terry L. Gentry
Title: Managing Director
Exhibit B 

Exhibit B page 1 of 15

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5157-2 Filed: 12/18/19 Entered: 12/18/19 08:29:36 Page 1

of 15
Exhibit B page 2 of 15

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5157-2 Filed: 12/18/19 Entered: 12/18/19 08:29:36 Page 2

of 15
Exhibit B page 3 of 15

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5157-2 Filed: 12/18/19 Entered: 12/18/19 08:29:36 Page 3

of 15
Exhibit B page 4 of 15

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5157-2 Filed: 12/18/19 Entered: 12/18/19 08:29:36 Page 4

of 15
Exhibit B page 5 of 15

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5157-2 Filed: 12/18/19 Entered: 12/18/19 08:29:36 Page 5

of 15
Exhibit B page 6 of 15

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5157-2 Filed: 12/18/19 Entered: 12/18/19 08:29:36 Page 6

of 15
Exhibit B page 7 of 15

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5157-2 Filed: 12/18/19 Entered: 12/18/19 08:29:36 Page 7

of 15
Exhibit B page 8 of 15

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5157-2 Filed: 12/18/19 Entered: 12/18/19 08:29:36 Page 8

of 15
Exhibit B page 9 of 15

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5157-2 Filed: 12/18/19 Entered: 12/18/19 08:29:36 Page 9

of 15
Exhibit B page 10 of 15

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5157-2 Filed: 12/18/19 Entered: 12/18/19 08:29:36 Page 10

of 15
Exhibit B page 11 of 15

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5157-2 Filed: 12/18/19 Entered: 12/18/19 08:29:36 Page 11

of 15
Exhibit B page 12 of 15

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5157-2 Filed: 12/18/19 Entered: 12/18/19 08:29:36 Page 12

of 15
Exhibit B page 13 of 15

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5157-2 Filed: 12/18/19 Entered: 12/18/19 08:29:36 Page 13

of 15

Exhibit B page 15 of 15

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5157-2 Filed: 12/18/19 Entered: 12/18/19 08:29:36 Page 15

of 15
A96A1437.

#### CORNELL v. THE STATE.

(474 SE2d 634)

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Defendant was tried before a jury for kidnapping with bodily injury, rape, false imprisonment, possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and obstruction of an officer in that he did resist and obstruct S. E. Buice and G. R. Horner, law enforcement officers, in the lawful discharge of their duties, by offering and doing violence to the officers. The evidence adduced at trial reveals that defendant physically resisted arrest when law enforcement officers entered defendant’s home to execute a warrant for defendant’s arrest. The jury found defendant guilty of obstruction of an officer, but could not reach verdicts as to the other crimes charged in the indictment. This appeal followed the denial of defendant’s motion for new trial. *Held:*

Defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, arguing that he did not wilfully and knowingly resist the officers when they entered his home. Defendant explains that he was merely attempting to stand when the arresting officers forcibly entered his home and violently subdued him with unwarranted force. This enumeration of error is without merit.

“On appeal of criminal convictions, we do not weigh the evidence or determine the credibility of witnesses; these are jury functions. When the jury has considered the evidence and made its finding, then on appeal the evidence is construed in favor of the jury’s verdict. *Gurlaskie v. State,*196 Ga. App. 794 (397 SE2d 66). On review of a verdict of guilty, we merely determine whether the evidence is suffi*477cient from which a rational trier of fact could conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that appellant committed the offense as charged. *Jackson v. Virginia,*443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560).” *Williams v. State,*202 Ga. App. 728 (1), 729 (415 SE2d 327). In the case sub judice, Officer S. E. Buice of the DeKalb County Police Department testified that defendant “made a lunge toward [him] from the couch” when he attempted to execute the warrant for defendant’s arrest. Officer Buice explained that a violent struggle then ensued and that he and other law enforcement officers subdued defendant and executed the warrant for defendant’s arrest. Detective G. R. Horner of the DeKalb County Police Department testified and corroborated Officer Buice’s testimony that defendant violently resisted arrest. This evidence alone is sufficient to authorize the jury’s finding that defendant is guilty, beyond a reasonable doubt, of obstruction of an officer as charged in the indictment. *Jackson v. Virginia,*443 U. S. 307, supra; *Duitsman v. State,*212 Ga. App. 348 (1) (441 SE2d 888).

Decided July 22, 1996

Reconsideration denied August 13, 1996.

*Letitia B. Delan,*for appellant.

Eddie Cornell, pro *se.*

*J. Tom Morgan, District Attorney, Robert M. Coker, Jacqueline S. Hardy, Assistant District Attorneys,*for appellee.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Johnson and Ruffin, JJ, concur.*
Exhibit
10.61


 


AMENDMENT
NO.2 TO INTERCOMPANY REVOLVING LOAN AGREEMENT


 


This
Amendment No. 2 to Intercompany Revolving Loan Agreement (this "Amendment") is entered into as of March 30,2016 by and
between Apollo Medical Management, Inc. ("Lender") and Maverick Medical Group, Inc. ("Borrower") with reference
to the following facts:


 


WHEREAS,
Lender and Borrower originally entered into that certain Intercompany Revolving Loan Agreement dated as of February 1, 2013 (the
"Original Agreement"), as amended by Amendment No.l to Intercompany Revolving Loan Agreement dated as of March 28,2014
(the "Amended Agreement"); and


 


WHEREAS,
the Original Agreement provided, among other things, for a Commitment equal to One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) extended by Lender
in favor of Borrower; and


 


WHEREAS,
Borrower has requested that Lender increase the Commitment; and


 


WHEREAS,
Lender is willing to increase the Commitment on the terms and conditions provided for in this Amendment:


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby
agree as follows:


 


		1.	All terms not defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings
ascribed to them in the Original Agreement.



		2.	Section 1.3 of the Original Agreement is deleted in its entirety
and replaced with the following: "1.3 "Commitment" shall mean an amount equal to Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00)".



		3.	Section 6.1 of the Original Agreement is amended by changing
the suite number for delivery of notices for each of Lender and Borrower to "Suite 1400", with all other address information
remaining unchanged.



		4.	The parties acknowledge and agree that, pursuant to Section
2.6 of the Original Agreement, the Obligations of Borrower have heretofore been evidenced by account entries in Lender's books
and records and there is no existing promissory note evidencing the outstanding amount of Borrower's Obligations.



		5.	Except to the extent provided for herein, all terms and conditions
of the Amended Agreement remain in full force and effect. In the event of a conflict between the terms of the Original Agreement
or the Amended Agreement and this Amendment, the terms of this Amendment shall govern.



 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.


  


	 	MAVERICK MEDICAL GROUP, INC.
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Mark Marten
	 	Name: Mark Marten
	 	Title: Chief Executive Officer
	 	 
	 	APOLLO MEDICAL MANAGEMENT, INC.
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Warren Hossinion
	 	Name: Warren Hosseinion
	 	Title: Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

In re: 

Pacific Gas & Electric Corp., et al.

 Debtors. 

Chapter 11 

Case No. 19-30088 Chapter 11 

(Jointly Administered) 

TRANSFER OF CLAIM OTHER THAN FOR SECURITY

A CLAIM HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS CASE or deemed filed under 11 U.S.C. § 

1111(a). Transferee hereby gives evidence and notice pursuant to Rule 3001(e)(2) of the Federal 

Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure of the transfer, other than for security, of the claim referenced in 

this evidence and notice. 

GeoStabilization International

Name of Transferor 

Phone: (720) 375-2169 

Last Four Digits of Acct #: N/A 

Name and Address where notices and 

payments to transferee should be sent: 

Whitebox Multi-Strategy Partners, LP 

c/o Whitebox Advisors 

3033 Excelsior Blvd, Suite 300 

Minneapolis, MN 55416-4675 

Attn: Scott Specken 

Whitebox Multi-Strategy Partners, LP

Name of Transferee 

Phone: (612) 355-2003 

Last Four Digits of Acct #: N/A 

Claim No: 66815 

Debtor: Pacific Gas & Electric Company 

(19-30089) 

Date Filed: October 18, 2019 

Total Amount of Claim: $1,360,996.60 

Transferred Amount of Claim: 

$1,360,996.60 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the information provided in this notice is true and correct 

to the best of my knowledge and belief. 

By:______________________________ Date:____________ 

Transferee/Transferee’s Agent 

Penalty for making a false statement: Fine of up to $500,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years, 

or both. 18 U.S.C. 152 & 3571. 

DocuSign Envelope ID: D54044DC-E243-4672-9F66-9646A9880B9D

1/22/2020 | 06:29 PST

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5441 Filed: 01/22/20 Entered: 01/22/20 12:07:58 Page 1 of

2
DocuSign Envelope ID: BC00F508-8B28-4778-8360-CDF08E1FB925

Mark Strefling

Partner & CEO

100 1,360,996.60 21

DocuSign Envelope ID: D54044DC-E243-4672-9F66-9646A9880B9D

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5441 Filed: 01/22/20 Entered: 01/22/20 12:07:58 Page 2 of

2
#### In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Estate of Joseph McCrea, Deceased. J. Albert McCrea and Mary J. Gettys, as Executors, etc., of Joseph McCrea, Deceased, Appellants; Edith McCrea, Respondent.

Decree unanimously affirmed? with costs.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1585

ANNETTE SHARIF,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

R. PETER MASTERTON, Department of the Army,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief 

District Judge. (3:11-cv-00160-JRS)

Submitted: September 29, 2011 Decided: October 4, 2011

Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Annette Sharif, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Annette Sharif appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing her civil complaint without prejudice pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), (ii) (2006), and a subsequent order 

denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find 

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons 

stated by the district court. Sharif v. Masterton, No. 3:11-cv00160-JRS (E.D. Va. April 19, 2011; May 17, 2011). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP

767 Fifth Avenue

New York, NY 10153-0119

Exhibit C

CUSTOMARY AND COMPARABLE COMPENSATION DISCLOSURES

Category of 

Timekeeper

BLENDED HOURLY RATE

Billed by timekeepers in 

New York, excluding 

bankruptcy2

Billed in this Application

Partner $1,211.00 $1,297.00

Counsel $969.00 $1,029.00

Senior Associate (7 

years or more since 

first admission)

$907.00 $959.00

Mid-level Associate 

(4-6 years since first 

admission)

$823.00 $918.00

Junior Associate (0-3 

years since first 

admission)

$606.00 $649.00

Paralegal $308.00 $307.00

Other $297.00 $350.00

All timekeepers 

aggregated $817.00 $946.00

 2 In accordance with the Guidelines for Reviewing Applications for Compensation and Reimbursement 

of Expenses Filed under 11 U.S.C. § 330 by Attorneys in Larger Chapter 11 Cases, effective November 

1, 2013, preceding year is a rolling 12 months year ending October 31, 2019; blended rates reflect work 

performed in preceding year in Weil’s New York office in which timekeepers collectively billed at least 

10% of the hours to the case during the application period, excluding all data from bankruptcy law 

matters.

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4739-3 Filed: 11/14/19 Entered: 11/14/19 16:36:57 Page 1

of 1
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5279 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 15:33:55 Page 1 of

15
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5279 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 15:33:55 Page 2 of

15
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5279 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 15:33:55 Page 3 of

15
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5279 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 15:33:55 Page 4 of

15
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5279 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 15:33:55 Page 5 of

15
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5279 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 15:33:55 Page 6 of

15
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5279 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 15:33:55 Page 7 of

15
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5279 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 15:33:55 Page 8 of

15
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5279 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 15:33:55 Page 9 of

15
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5279 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 15:33:55 Page 10

of 15
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5279 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 15:33:55 Page 11

of 15
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5279 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 15:33:55 Page 12

of 15
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5279 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 15:33:55 Page 13

of 15
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5279 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 15:33:55 Page 14

of 15
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5279 Filed: 01/06/20 Entered: 01/06/20 15:33:55 Page 15

of 15
Order entered September 16, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 00242
- CR WILLIAM WAYNE LAUBE, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Tria l Court Cause No. 401
- 81056
- 2012



### O RDER
The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8( b ). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.

– Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure eff ective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.
T his appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DEON COLEMAN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 282 WAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 21st day of December, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
----

| Re: | LB-UBS      Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-C1 |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------|

| 1.   | A      review of the Master Servicer’s activities during the reporting period      ending December 31, 2007, and of its performance under the Pooling and      Servicing Agreement has been made under my  supervision. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | To      the best of my knowledge, based on my review, the Master Servicer has      fulfilled all of its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement      in all material respects throughout the reporting period ending December      31, 2007, except that updated financial statements for Significant      Obligors received by the Master Servicer were delivered by the Master      Servicer but not within one (1) Business Day after receipt as required by      Section 8.15(q) of the Pooling and Servicing  Agreement. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:  | /s/      Bryan Nitcher      | Date:  March      13, 2008  |   |
|-----------|----------------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|      | Bryan      Nitcher          |                                  |   |
|      | Senior Vice      President  |                                  |   |
|      |                             |                                  |   |

----