alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

IN THE MATTER OF THE ADMISSION

OF

JOHN ROBERT RIZZARDI

TO PRACTICE IN THE COURTS OF THIS STATE

BAR NO. 9388

CERTIFICATE

OF

GOOD STANDING

I, Susan L. Carlson, Clerk of the Supreme Court of the State of Washington, hereby certify

JOHN ROBERT RIZZARDI

was regularly admitted to practice as an Attomey and Counselor at Law in the Supreme Court and

all the Courts of the State of Washington on October 30,1979, and is now and has continuously

since that date been an attomey in good standing, and has a current status of active.

SUPS:

o a

o

c.

'ED

CQ 1-3

O

G

2^was^^

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have

hereunto set my hand and affixed

the seal of said Court this 22"'' day of

October, 2019.

Susan L. Carlson

Supreme Court Clerk

Washington State Supreme Court

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4395-1 Filed: 10/22/19 Entered: 10/22/19 17:13:36 Page 1

of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In re )

) Case No. 

) 

) Chapter

Debtor(s). )

____________________________________)

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF 

ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE

, whose business address and telephone number is

and who is an active member in good standing of the bar of

having applied in the above-entitled action for admission to practice in the Northern District of

California on a pro hac vice basis, representing

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application is granted, subject to the terms and

conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate appearance pro hac

vice. Service of papers upon and communication with co-counsel designated in the application

will constitute notice to the represented party. All future filings in this action are subject to the

Bankruptcy Local Rules and Electronic Case Filing Procedures adopted by the United States

Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California. 

Dated: ____________________________________

United States Bankruptcy Judge

19-30088-DM; 19-30089-DM

11

PG&E CORPORATION; 

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY,

Christy Rivera

Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP, 1301 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10019, 

Telephone 212-408-5100 

New York

NextEra Energy, Inc., et al. 

Hon. Dennis Montali

Signed and Filed: February 15, 2019

________________________________________

DENNIS MONTALI

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

Entered on Docket 

February 15, 2019

EDWARD J. EMMONS, CLERK 

U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 462 Filed: 02/15/19 Entered: 02/15/19 15:22:28 Page 1 of 1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of PITOOEY!, INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jacob DiMartino, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Patrick Deparini, acting in the capacity as the Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Jacob DiMartino 

     Jacob DiMartino

     Chief Executive Officer 

     June 24, 2013

/s/ Patrick Deparini

     Patrick Deparini

     Principal Financial Officer 

     June 24, 2013
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5358 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5358

To amend the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 to clarify that 
  no Federal agency shall be required to consider the social cost of 
   carbon as a condition of compliance with such Act, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 31, 2014

 Mr. McKinley introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 to clarify that 
  no Federal agency shall be required to consider the social cost of 
   carbon as a condition of compliance with such Act, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AGENCIES NOT REQUIRED TO CONSIDER SOCIAL COST OF CARBON.

    Title I of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 
4331 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
section:
    ``Sec. 106. (a) No Federal agency shall be required to consider the 
social cost of carbon as part of any cost-benefit or regulatory 
analysis of any program, project, activity, or administrative action of 
the agency as a condition of compliance with this Act.
    ``(b) In this section:
            ``(1) The term `Federal agency' has the meaning given the 
        term `Executive agency' in section 133 of title 41, United 
        States Code.
            ``(2) The term `social cost of carbon' means the social 
        cost of carbon as described in the technical support document 
        entitled `Technical Support Document: Technical 15 Update of 
        the Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis Under 
        Executive Order No. 12866', published by the Interagency 
        Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon, United States 
        Government, in May 2013, revised in November 2013, or any 
        successor or substantially related document, or any other 
        estimate of the monetized damages associated with an 
        incremental increase in carbon dioxide emissions in a given 
        year.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### William T. Vanduzer, administrator, plaintiff in error, *vs.*Thomas J. Heard *et al.,*defendants in error.

This case rests solely upon the validity of the Act of October, 1870, requiring the plaintiff in certain cases to file an affidavit of taxes paid, and the majority of this Court having decided said Act valid, the judgment of the Court below is affirmed.

Warner, C. J., dissented.

Belief Act of 1870. Tax affidavit. Before Judge Andrews. Elbert Superior Court. September Term, 1872.

William T. Yanduzer, as administrator of Ira Christian, deceased, brought complaint against George E. Heard, as principal, and Thomas J. Heard, as security, upon a promissory note, dated March 6th, 1860, and due December 25th, in the same year, for $2,369 08, besides interest. When the case was called for trial defendants moved the Court to dismiss the same, upon the ground that no tax affidavit had been filed as required by the Belief Act of October 13th, 1870. The motion was sustained and the case dismissed. Plaintiffs excepted, and now assigns said ruling as error.

Bobert Toombs ; W. M. & M. P. Beese, for plaintiff in error.

No appearance for defendants.

McCay, Judge.

This case rests solely upon the validity of the Act of October, 1870, requiring the plaintiff in certain cases to file an affidavit of taxes paid, and the majority of this Court having decided said Act valid, the judgment of the Court below dismissing the case, is affirmed.

Montgomery, Judge, concurred, and Warner, Chief Justice, dissented, but furnished no opinions.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

May 10, 2021

No. 04

- 20

- 00051

- CV

MEDFINMANAGER, LLC,

Appellant

v.

John SALAS, Appellee

From the 4 07th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019

- CI

- 22706 Honorable Karen H. Pozza , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellee ’ s unopposed mot ion for extension of time to file supplemental letter is GRANTED

.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 10th day of May, 2021

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
N OTE : This o rder is non precedential.


# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
ISAAC A. POTTER, JR.
, Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

ROBERTA S. BREN, OBL ON SPIVAK, MICHELLE K. LEE, DEPUTY DIREC TOR, U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, AND LINDA M. KING, Defendants

- Appellees.

______________________

2014

- 1379

______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Easte rn District of Virginia in No. 1:13

- cv

- 01417

- CMH

IDD, Senior Judge Claude M. Hilton.

______________________

P ER C URIAM

.

O R D E R

Upon review, it appears that this court may lack j urisdiction over Isaac A. Potter’s recently

- docketed appeal.

Mr. Potter filed his action in the United States Di strict Court for the Easter n District of Virginia and made allegations of, among other things, criminal copyright infringement, criminal trademark infringement, unfair competition, and fraud. I t appears that his dis trict court Case: 14-1379 Document: 2 Page: 1 Filed: 03/31/2014POTTER v. BREN 2

complaint challeng es at least in part registration of the trademark KNIGHTS OF THE ZODIAC to registrant Toei Animation Co.

Mr. Potter previously appealed the district court ’s deni al of his motion for default judgment to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit , which dismissed as interlocutory. Mr. Potter’s current appeal appears to stem from the district court’s order granting certain defendants’ motions to dismiss and directing Mr. Potter to file an amended complaint.

This court is a court of limited jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. § 1295. Based only upon our review, it does not appear that the district court’s jurisdiction arose in whole or in part under the laws specified in § 1295 as defining this court’s appellate jurisdiction.

Accor dingly,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT : (1) The parties are directed to respond within 21 days from the date of this order as to whether this appeal should be dismissed or transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Four th Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631.
(2) The briefing schedule is stayed.

F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

s30 Case: 14-1379 Document: 2 Page: 2 Filed: 03/31/2014
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5356 

To amend section 3720D of title 31, United States Code, to prohibit wage 

garnishment by the Environmental Protection Agency. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 31, 2014 

Mr. MCALLISTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend section 3720D of title 31, United States Code, 

to prohibit wage garnishment by the Environmental Protection Agency. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preventing the EPA 

5 from Garnishing Wages Act of 2014’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON WAGE GARNISHMENT BY THE EN7 VIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. 

8 Section 3720D of title 31, United States Code, is 

9 amended by adding at the end the following: 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5356 IH

1 ‘‘(i) This section shall not apply to a debt owed pur2 suant to a program administered by the Environmental 

3 Protection Agency.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel; Race-Based Social Stress and Health in the MADICS Longitudinal Study, University of Michigan at Ann Arbor.                    

*Date:*                         June 25, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Michele C. Hindi-Alexander, PhD, Division of Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 1600 Executive Boulevard, Rm. 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-8382,                         *hindialm@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 27, 2010.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. 

[FR Doc. 2010-13414 Filed 6-3-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12

- 51191 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
LEOPOLDO VALENCIA

- URREA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:10

- CR

- 973

- 3

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Leopoldo Valenci a
- Urrea appeals his guilty

- plea convictions and sentences for conspiracy to commit wire fraud, wire fraud, and conspiracy to commit money laundering. H e claims he was den ied his Sixth Amendment right to the effective assistance of counsel (IAC) . In particular, he maintain s counsel , inter alia , encourag ed him to sign a plea agreement that provided little or no benefit to him and failed to file a written response to the

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 5, 2013 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 12-51191 Document: 00512461757 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/05/2013No. 12

- 51191
Government’s sentencing memorandum , which sought an increased sentence based on his post

- plea conduct. Valencia did not raise his IAC claim s in district court. “ [T]he general rule in this circuit is that a claim for ineffective assistance o f counsel cann ot be resolved on direct appeal when the claim has not been raised before the district court since no opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits of the allegations. ” United States v. Cantwell , 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006) (alteration i n original) ( citation and internal quotation marks omitted )

. Because “ we cannot fairly eval uate the [IAC] claim [s] from the record” , we decline to consider them, without prejudice to his right to raise the m in a subsequent proceeding , such as pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255

. United States v. Gulley , 526 F.3d 809, 821 (5th Cir. 2008)

. 

### AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 12-51191 Document: 00512461757 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/05/2013
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5420 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 17 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 16), 2014 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

AN ACT 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit 

the release of information regarding the status of certain 

investigations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5420 RFS

1 SECTION 1. RELEASE OF INFORMATION REGARDING THE 

2 STATUS OF CERTAIN INVESTIGATIONS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 6103(e) of the Internal 

4 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

5 the following new paragraph: 

6 ‘‘(11) DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION REGARD7 ING STATUS OF INVESTIGATION OF VIOLATION OF

8 THIS SECTION.—In the case of a person who pro9 vides to the Secretary information indicating a viola10 tion of section 7213, 7213A, or 7214 with respect 

11 to any return or return information of such person, 

12 the Secretary may disclose to such person (or such 

13 person’s designee)— 

14 ‘‘(A) whether an investigation based on the 

15 person’s provision of such information has been 

16 initiated and whether it is open or closed, 

17 ‘‘(B) whether any such investigation sub18 stantiated such a violation by any individual, 

19 and 

20 ‘‘(C) whether any action has been taken 

21 with respect to such individual (including 

22 whether a referral has been made for prosecu23 tion of such individual).’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 5420 RFS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment 

3 of this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 16, 

2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### John H. Abrams, Jr., and others, Appellants, v. Henry *F.*Johnson, Respondent.

Judgment of County Court affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Pratt, J.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BAKER 

&

HOSTETLER LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

EXHIBIT A

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4316-1 Filed: 10/18/19 Entered: 10/18/19 16:29:01 Page 1

of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BAKER 

&

HOSTETLER LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

LOS ANGELES

Robert A. Julian (SBN 884469)

Cecily A. Dumas (SBN 111449)

BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP

1160 Battery Street, Suite 100

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: 628.208.6434

Facsimile: 310.820.8859

Email: rjulian@bakerlaw.com

Email: cdumas@bakerlaw.com

Eric E. Sagerman (SBN 155496)

David J. Richardson (SBN 168592)

Lauren T. Attard (SBN 320898)

BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP

11601 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1400

Los Angeles, CA 90025-0509

Telephone: 310.820.8800

Facsimile: 310.820.8859

Email: esagerman@bakerlaw.com

Email: drichardson@bakerlaw.com

Email: lattard@bakerlaw.com

Counsel for Official Committee of Tort Claimants

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION

-andPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY,

Debtors

Bankruptcy Case 

No. 19-30088 (DM)

Chapter 11

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

□ Affects PG& E Corporation

□ Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company

■ Affects both Debtors

*All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case, 

No. 19-30088 (DM)

ORDER AUTHORIZING THE FILING 

OF REDACTED DRINKHALL 

DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF 

MOTION OF THE OFFICIAL 

COMMITTEE OF TORT CLAIMANTS 

PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. §§ 105(a) AND 

501 AND FED. R. BANKR. P. 3003(c) 

FOR ENTRY OF AN ORDER 

EXTENDING THE BAR DATE

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4316-1 Filed: 10/18/19 Entered: 10/18/19 16:29:01 Page 2

of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BAKER 

&

HOSTETLER LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

LOS ANGELES

- 2 -

The Court, having considered the Motion of the Official Committee of Tort Claimants 

(the “TCC”) for for entry of an order authorizing the TCC to file a redacted Declaration of James 

Drinkhall in Support of the TCC’s motion to extend the bar date (the “Redaction Motion”), and 

after due deliberation and sufficient cause appearing therefor:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Redaction Motion is granted.

2. This Court shall retain jurisdiction to hear and determine all matters arising from 

or related to the implementation, interpretation, or enforcement of this Order.

** END OF ORDER **

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4316-1 Filed: 10/18/19 Entered: 10/18/19 16:29:01 Page 3

of 3
EVIDENCE OF TRANSFER OF CLAIM 

TO: United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California (the “Bankruptcy Court”)

Attn: Clerk 

AND TO: Seller 

Date: October 24, 2019 

Main case name: PG&E Corporation 

Main case no.: 19-30088

Pacific Gas & Electric Company (“Debtor”)

Case No. 19-30089 (the “Case”)

Proof of Claim Number: 8930 

Amount of Claim Transferred: $752,644.21 

Kiefner & Associates, Inc. and its successors and assigns (“Seller”), for good and valuable consideration, 

the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, does hereby certify that it has 

unconditionally and irrevocably sold, transferred and assigned unto

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. 

Mail Code: DE3-4127 

500 Stanton Christiana Rd., NCC5, Floor 01 

Newark, DE 19713 

Attention: Brian M. Ercolani 

Telephone: 302-634-1486 

e-mail address: CLS_Notices@jpmchase.com 

and its successors and assigns (“Buyer”), all right, title and interest in and to Proof of Claim Number 8930 

in the amount of $752,644.21 (the “Claim”) against Debtor in the Case in the Bankruptcy Court, or any 

other court with jurisdiction over the bankruptcy proceedings of the Debtor. 

Seller hereby waives any objection to the transfer of the Claim to Buyer on the books and records of the 

Debtor and the Bankruptcy Court, and hereby waives to the fullest extent permitted by law any notice or 

right to a hearing as may be imposed by Rule 3001 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, the 

Bankruptcy Code, applicable local bankruptcy rules or applicable law. Seller acknowledges and 

understands, and hereby stipulates that an order of the Bankruptcy Court may be entered without further 

notice to Seller transferring to Buyer the Claim and recognizing the Buyer as the sole owner and holder of 

the Claim. 

You are hereby directed to make all future payments and distributions, and to give all notices and other 

communications, in respect of the Claim to Buyer. 

[Signature page follows] 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4519 Filed: 10/30/19 Entered: 10/30/19 10:31:50 Page 1 of

2
Brian M. Ercolani 

Operations Manager

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4519 Filed: 10/30/19 Entered: 10/30/19 10:31:50 Page 2 of

2