alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AT JULY 31, 1999 (UNAUDITED) AND THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED
JULY 31, 1999 (UNAUDITED)
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                          69,008
<SECURITIES>                                    10,333
<RECEIVABLES>                                   62,281
<ALLOWANCES>                                       904
<INVENTORY>                                     87,190
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               228,271
<PP&E>                                         418,572
<DEPRECIATION>                                 161,666
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 525,253
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          108,986
<BONDS>                                        421,070
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (131,830)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   525,253
<SALES>                                        392,478
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               392,478
<CGS>                                          342,912
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  342,912
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                31,147
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              34,278
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,530)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (21,489)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,959
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,959
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION and PACIFIC GAS 

AND ELECTRIC COMPANY,

Debtors

Chapter 11 

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

(Jointly Administered)

TRANSFER OF CLAIM OTHER THAN FOR SECURITY

A CLAIM HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS CASE or deemed filed under 11 U.S.C. § 1111(a). 

Transferee hereby gives evidence and notice pursuant to Rule 3001(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of 

Bankruptcy Procedure of the transfer, other than for security, of the claim referenced in this 

evidence and notice.

Pioneer Machinery, Inc._____ Cherokee Debt Acquisition, LLC

Name of Transferor Name of Transferee

Name and Current Address of

Transferor:

Pioneer Machinery, Inc.

120 Pioneer Ave. 

Woodland, CA 95776 

Attn: Chris Galloway

Name and Address where notices and payments 

to transferee should be sent: 

Cherokee Debt Acquisition, LLC

1325 Avenue of the Americas, 28th Floor 

New York, NY 10019 

Attn: Vladimir Jelisavcic

Schedule/Claim No. Creditor Name Amount Debtor Case No.

Claim No. 3205 Pioneer Machinery, Inc $41,500.00 Pacific Gas and Electric Company 19-30089

Claim No. 590 Pioneer Machinery, Inc. $37,000.00 Pacific Gas and Electric Company 19-30089

I declare under penalty of perjury that the information provided in this notice is true and correct 

to the best of my knowledge and belief.

By: _____________________ Date: December 20, 2019 

Transferee/Transferee’s Agent

Penalty for making a false statement: Fine of up to $500,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years, 

or both. 18 U.S.C. §§ 152 & 3571. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5180 Filed: 12/20/19 Entered: 12/20/19 08:49:17 Page 1 of

3
CHEROKEE DEBT ACQUISITION, LLC

1325 Avenue of the Americas, 28th Floor

New York, NY 10019

Attn: Vladimir Jelisavcic

CHEROKEE DEBT ACQUISITION, LLC

Vladimir Jelisavcic

Manager

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5180 Filed: 12/20/19 Entered: 12/20/19 08:49:17 Page 2 of

3
CHEROKEE DEBT ACQUISITION, LLC

1325 Avenue of the Americas, 28th Floor

New York, NY 10019

Attn: Vladimir Jelisavcic

CHEROKEE DEBT ACQUISITION, LLC

Vladimir Jelisavcic

Manager

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5180 Filed: 12/20/19 Entered: 12/20/19 08:49:17 Page 3 of

3
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Amendment No. 1 to the annual report of NeurogesX, Inc. on Form
10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of NeurogesX, Inc.

Dated: January 21, 2011



By:

/s/ Anthony A. DiTonnoAnthony A. DiTonnoPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)




By:

/s/ Stephen F. GhiglieriStephen F. GhiglieriExecutive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*William H Manning v. Same Defendant.
EXHIBIT A

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3938-1 Filed: 09/19/19 Entered: 09/19/19 12:17:48 Page 1

of 2
EXHIBIT A

COMPENSATION BY PROFESSIONAL

FOR THE PERIOD JUNE 1, 2019 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2019

Billing Total Total

Professional Position Rate Hours Fees

Brent Williams Managing Director $ 1,195 227,528.00 190.4 $ 

Alex Stevenson Managing Director 1,195 56.2 67,159.00 

Brendan Murphy Managing Director 1,095 225.6 247,032.00 

Sherman Guillema Director 895 2.9 2,595.50 

Peter Gnatowski Vice President 795 258.6 205,587.00 

Matt Merkel Associate 695 101.8 70,751.00

Naeem Muscatwalla Senior Analyst 495 39.1 19,354.50 

Riley Jacobs Analyst 395 89.6 35,392.00 

Alex Gebert Analyst 395 201.0 79,395.00

Jane Su Professional Support 250 4.6 1,150.00 

Subtotal 1,169.8 $ 955,944.00

Less: 50% Discount for Non-Working Travel Time (17,445.25)

Grand Total $ 938,498.75

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3938-1 Filed: 09/19/19 Entered: 09/19/19 12:17:48 Page 2

of 2
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-51044

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Robert Harvison Graham, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:09-CR-144-1

Before King, Higginson, and Willett, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Robert Harvison Graham, federal prisoner #03228-079, appeals the 

district court’s denial of his motion for compassionate release. He argues that 

the district court abused its discretion by unreasonably focusing on harmful 

parts of his record while ignoring mitigating factors (such as his postconviction rehabilitation, his prison disciplinary record, and the need to avoid 

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 12, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-51044 Document: 00516574689 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/12/2022
No. 21-51044

2

unwarranted sentencing disparities following the amendment to 18 U.S.C. 

§ 924(c) under the First Step Act of 2018).

We review the district court’s denial of a motion for compassionate 

release for abuse of discretion. United States v. Cooper, 996 F.3d 283, 286 (5th 

Cir. 2021). Even if the sentencing disparities and other factors that Graham 

points to constitute “extraordinary reasons” favoring release under 18 

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i), Graham “still must convince the district judge to 

exercise discretion to grant the motion after considering the § 3553(a) 

factors.” United States v. Shkambi, 993 F.3d 388, 392 (5th Cir. 2021). 

The district court concluded that Graham failed to show that the 

§ 3553(a) factors support an early release. That finding was not an abuse of 

discretion. On the contrary, the district court’s decision focused on specific 

facts from Graham’s criminal history, including the escalating violence that 

Graham employed with each successive offense. Graham “may disagree with 

how the district court balanced the § 3553(a) factors, [but] that is not a 

sufficient ground for reversal.” United States v. Chambliss, 948 F.3d 691, 694 

(5th Cir. 2020).

AFFIRMED.

Case: 21-51044 Document: 00516574689 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/12/2022
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 555 

To amend the Mineral Leasing Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior 

to conduct onshore oil and gas lease sales through Internet-based live 

lease sales, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2013 

Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio (for himself, Mr. DUNCAN of South Carolina, and Mr. 

BISHOP of Utah) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Mineral Leasing Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct onshore oil and gas 

lease sales through Internet-based live lease sales, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘BLM Live Internet 

5 Auctions Act’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 555 IH

1 SEC. 2. INTERNET-BASED ONSHORE OIL AND GAS LEASE 

2 SALES. 

3 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—Section 17(b)(1) of the Min4 eral Leasing Act (30 U.S.C. 226(b)(1)) is amended— 

5 (1) in subparagraph (A), in the third sentence, 

6 by inserting ‘‘, except as provided in subparagraph 

7 (C)’’ after ‘‘by oral bidding’’; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(C) In order to diversify and expand the Nation’s 

10 onshore leasing program to ensure the best return to the 

11 Federal taxpayer, reduce fraud, and secure the leasing 

12 process, the Secretary may conduct onshore lease sales 

13 through Internet-based bidding methods. Each individual 

14 Internet-based lease sale shall conclude within 7 days.’’. 

15 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 90 days after the tenth 

16 Internet-based lease sale conducted under the amendment 

17 made by subsection (a), the Secretary of the Interior shall 

18 analyze the first 10 such lease sales and report to Con19 gress the findings of the analysis. The report shall in20 clude— 

21 (1) estimates on increases or decreases in such 

22 lease sales, compared to sales conducted by oral bid23 ding, in— 

24 (A) the number of bidders; 

25 (B) the average amount of bid; 

26 (C) the highest amount bid; and 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 555 IH

1 (D) the lowest bid; 

2 (2) an estimate on the total cost or savings to 

3 the Department of the Interior as a result of such 

4 sales, compared to sales conducted by oral bidding; 

5 and 

6 (3) an evaluation of the demonstrated or ex7 pected effectiveness of different structures for lease 

8 sales which may provide an opportunity to better 

9 maximize bidder participation, ensure the highest re10 turn to the Federal taxpayers, minimize opportuni11 ties for fraud or collusion, and ensure the security 

12 and integrity of the leasing process. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5341 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5341

  To delay for 1 year the application of Revenue Ruling 2012-18 with 
respect to the characterization of payments as tips or service charges.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 31, 2014

 Mr. Gallego introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To delay for 1 year the application of Revenue Ruling 2012-18 with 
respect to the characterization of payments as tips or service charges.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DELAY IN APPLICATION OF REVENUE RULING 2012-18 WITH RESPECT 
              TO CHARACTERIZATION OF TIPS OR SERVICE CHARGES.

    The Secretary of the Treasury shall not apply Revenue Ruling 2012-
18 (or any other similar guidance) for purposes of determining whether 
any payment made before January 1, 2015, is a tip as opposed to a 
service charge.
                                 <all>
```
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5297 Filed: 12/30/19 Entered: 01/07/20 13:22:04 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5297 Filed: 12/30/19 Entered: 01/07/20 13:22:04 Page 2 of

2
#### Daniel Dolan and another, Respondents, v. The Newburgh, Dutchess and Connecticut Railroad Company, Appellant.

Reargument ordered.
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly report of Surg II, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and amended by Amendment No.1 (the
Report), I, Kenneth W. Brimmer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.

/s/ Kenneth W. Brimmer

Kenneth W. Brimmer
Chief Executive Officer
November 21, 2002

5
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4286    Filed: 10/18/19    Entered: 10/18/19 12:23:11    Page 1 of2

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4286    Filed: 10/18/19    Entered: 10/18/19 12:23:11    Page 2 of2
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4834-5    Filed: 11/21/19    Entered: 11/21/19 11:44:30    Page 1of 12

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4834-5    Filed: 11/21/19    Entered: 11/21/19 11:44:30    Page 2of 12

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4834-5    Filed: 11/21/19    Entered: 11/21/19 11:44:30    Page 3of 12

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4834-5    Filed: 11/21/19    Entered: 11/21/19 11:44:30    Page 4of 12

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4834-5    Filed: 11/21/19    Entered: 11/21/19 11:44:30    Page 5of 12

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4834-5    Filed: 11/21/19    Entered: 11/21/19 11:44:30    Page 6of 12

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4834-5    Filed: 11/21/19    Entered: 11/21/19 11:44:30    Page 7of 12

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4834-5    Filed: 11/21/19    Entered: 11/21/19 11:44:30    Page 8of 12

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4834-5    Filed: 11/21/19    Entered: 11/21/19 11:44:30    Page 9of 12

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4834-5    Filed: 11/21/19    Entered: 11/21/19 11:44:30    Page 10of 12

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4834-5    Filed: 11/21/19    Entered: 11/21/19 11:44:30    Page 11of 12

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4834-5    Filed: 11/21/19    Entered: 11/21/19 11:44:30    Page 12of 12
#### STATE v. JAMES W. BUCHANAN.

(Filed 8 November, 1944.)

Criminal Haw § 80—

A capital case will be docketed and dismissed for failure to perfect appeal, on motion of tbe Attorney-General, after tbe Court bas examined the recoi’d and finds no error.

MotioN by tbe State to docket and dismiss appeal under Rule 17.

Per Curiam.

On tbe motion to dismiss tbe following facts are made to appear:

Tbe defendant was tried before Bobbitt, Judge, and a jury at tbe June Term, 1944, Superior Court of Mecklenburg County, on a bill of indictment charging tbe capital felony of rape. There was a verdict of guilty of rape as charged in tbe bill of indictment-and from tbe sentence of death pronounced on tbe verdict of tbe jury tbe defendant gave notice of appeal to tbe Supreme Court. No case on appeal bas been docketed in tbis Court and no case on appeal bas been filed in tbe office of tbe clerk of tbe Superior Court of Mecklenburg County. Tbe time allowed by tbe Court, on agreement of counsel, for perfecting tbe appeal bas expired and counsel for defendant bas informed tbe clerk of tbe Superior *627Court of Mecklenburg County tbat they do not intend to perfect the same.

The defendant having failed to file proper case on appeal and his counsel having given notice that they have abandoned the appeal, the Attorney-General moves that the case be docketed here and the judgment of the Superior Court be affirmed under Eule 17. The motion must be allowed. *S. v. Watson,*208 N. C., 70, 179 S. E., 455; *S. v. Alexander, ante,*478; *S. v. Taylor, ante,*479.

As is customary with us' on a motion to dismiss an appeal in a criminal prosecution in which the defendant has been convicted of a capital felony, we have carefully examined the record proper and find that it fails to disclose any error.

Appeal dismissed. Judgment affirmed.
[666 NE2d 1052, 644 NYS2d 139]

#### In the Matter of Robert OO., Respondent-Appellant, v Michael J. Dowling, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, et al., Appellants-Respondents.

Decided April 4, 1996

*1044APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Dennis C. Vacco, Attorney-General,*Albany *(Lew A. Millenbach, Victoria A. Graffeo, Peter H. Schiff*and *Troy J. Oechsner*of counsel), for Michael J. Dowling, appellant-respondent.

*1045
      *Kevin L. O’Brien,*Albany, and *Carolyn Guresz*for Ross Prinzo, appellant-respondent.

*Roland, Fogel, Koblenz & Carr,*Albany *(Murray S. Carr*of counsel), for respondent-appellant.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, without costs *(see, Matter of Lee TT. v Dowling,*87 NY2d 699 [decided today]; *Matter of Joel P. v Bane,*87 NY2d 699 [decided today]).

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick.
Agreement to furnish instruments and agreements defining rights



 Exhibit 4.12 
  
 July 30, 2009 
 Securities and Exchange Commission 
 100 F Street, NE 
 Washington, D.C. 20549 
  

	 	 Re:
	 Worthington Industries, Inc. – Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended 



	 	     
	 May 31, 2009 — SEC File No. 1-8399 


 Ladies and Gentlemen: 
 Worthington Industries, Inc., an Ohio corporation, is today filing
its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2009 (the “Form 10-K”). 
 None of
(i) Worthington Industries, Inc., (ii) any of the consolidated subsidiaries of Worthington Industries, Inc. or (iii) Worthington Armstrong Venture, a 50%-owned unconsolidated joint venture (in the form of a general partnership between
Armstrong Ventures, Inc., a subsidiary of Armstrong World Industries, Inc., and The Worthington Steel Company (Delaware), a subsidiary of Worthington Industries, Inc.), for which financial statements are required to be filed with the Form 10-K, has
outstanding any instrument or agreement with respect to its long-term debt, other than those filed or incorporated by reference as exhibits to the Form 10-K, under which the total amount of long-term debt authorized exceeds 10% of the total assets
of Worthington Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. In accordance with the provisions of Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of SEC Regulation S-K, Worthington Industries, Inc. hereby agrees to furnish to the SEC, upon request, a copy
of each such instrument or agreement defining (i) the rights of holders of the long-term debt of Worthington Industries, Inc. or (ii) the rights of holders of the long-term debt of a consolidated subsidiary of Worthington Industries, Inc.
or (iii) the rights of holders of the long-term debt of Worthington Armstrong Venture, in each case which is not being filed or incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Form 10-K. 
  

	
	 Very truly yours,

	
	 WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.

	
	 /s/    B. Andrew Rose

	 B. Andrew Rose

	 Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, CoreyHenry, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2021-3 (the“Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. Basedon my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement inall material respects; and 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included inthis report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: WilmingtonTrust, National Association. 

 
By: /s/ Corey HenryName: Corey HenryTitle: President and Chief Executive Officer Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)Date: March 29, 2024**
#### Daniel C. Bradt, Appellant, v. Joseph Hynes, Respondent.

Order reversed, without costs and without prejudice to an application by defendant to enter the costs in the judgment and then to apply for set-off. Mem. by

Learned, P. J.