alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                              13
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            7635
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       1216
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                              18
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                18
<LOANS>                                          19454
<ALLOWANCE>                                         51
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   29085
<DEPOSITS>                                       26913
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                 53
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        2119
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                    2119
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    742
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                   42
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    37
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                   821
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 538
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 538
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              283
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    250
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     36
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                          36
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        29
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.20
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                    51
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                   51
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                51
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
I, Robert C. Salipante, Principal Executive Officer of Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (U.S.) (the "Company"), hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2004, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
* /s/Robert C. Salipante                  ____________

Robert C. Salipante

President

August 12, 2004

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 ("Section 906"), and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") or otherwise subject to liability under that section.  This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act except to the extent that this certification is expressly incorporated by reference into any such filing.
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4289    Filed: 10/18/19    Entered: 10/18/19 12:28:31    Page 1 of2

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4289    Filed: 10/18/19    Entered: 10/18/19 12:28:31    Page 2 of2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

M. Ryan Pinkston (SBN 310971) 

rpinkston@seyfarth.com 

560 Mission Street, Suite 3100 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 397-2823 

Facsimile: (415) 397-8549 

Attorneys for 

Turner Construction Company

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION, 

- and - 

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, 

Debtors. 

☐ Affects PG&E Corporation 

☒ Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company

☐ Affects both Debtors 

*All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case, 

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Bankruptcy Case

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Chapter 11 

(Lead Case) 

(Jointly Administered) 

TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY’S 

NOTICE OF PERFECTION OF LIEN 

PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. § 546(b)

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4914 Filed: 12/01/19 Entered: 12/01/19 12:50:57 Page 1 of

5
1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 362(b)(3) and 546(b), Turner Construction Company (“Turner”) hereby 

gives notice of its perfection of, maintenance and continuation of perfection of, and intention to enforce 

to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, see, e.g., California Civil Code § 8400 et seq., Turner’s 

duly recorded mechanic’s lien for labor, equipment, material, and services provided by Turner to Pacific 

Gas and Electric Company, as more fully described in the attached Exhibit A. See Village Nurseries v. 

Gould (In re Baldwin Builders), 232 B.R. 406 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 1999); Village Nurseries v. Greenbaum, 

101 Cal. App. 4th 26 (2002). This notice is in addition to, and not in lieu of, Turner’s right and intention 

to enforce its lien to the fullest extent permitted by law. Turner reserves all rights. 

DATED: December 1, 2019 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

By: /s/ M. Ryan Pinkston 

M. Ryan Pinkston 

Attorneys for Turner Construction Company

56430669v.1 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4914 Filed: 12/01/19 Entered: 12/01/19 12:50:57 Page 2 of

5
EXHIBIT A 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4914 Filed: 12/01/19 Entered: 12/01/19 12:50:57 Page 3 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4914 Filed: 12/01/19 Entered: 12/01/19 12:50:57 Page 4 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4914 Filed: 12/01/19 Entered: 12/01/19 12:50:57 Page 5 of

5
abtl_ex1087.htm


EXHIBIT 10.87



AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE

 

AUTOBYTEL.COM INC. 2000 STOCK OPTION PLAN

 

This Amendment No. 3 (“Amendment No. 3”), dated as of May 1, 2009, to the autobytel.com inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan, as amended (the “Plan”), is adopted by the Board of Directors (the “Board”)
of Autobytel Inc., a Delaware corporation, pursuant to Section 8.1 of the Plan.

 

Effective as of the date hereof, the Plan is hereby amended by deleting Section 6.6(b) in its entirety and inserting in lieu thereof the following:

 

“(b) Options shall be exercisable in full or in such equal or unequal installments as the Administrator (or the Special Committee) shall determine; provided that if an Optionee does not purchase all of the Shares which the Optionee is entitled to purchase on a certain date or within an established installment period, the Optionee’s
right to purchase any unpurchased Shares shall continue during the Option Term (taking into account any early termination of such Option Term which may be provided for under the Plan).”

 

Except as specifically amended hereby, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect as in existence on the date hereof, and any reference to the Plan shall mean the Plan as amended hereby.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board has caused this Amendment No. 3 to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written.

 

AUTOBYTEL INC.









By: /s/ Glenn E.Fuller                                                                

Glenn E. Fuller

Its: Executive Vice President, Chief Legal 

and Administrative Officer and Secretary
#### State Bank of Randolph, Appellant, v. William Hartson, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Haight, J., not sitting.
BAKER 

&

HOSTETLER LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

LOS 

ANGELES



(;+,%,7%

&203(16$7,21%<:25.7$6.&2'()25

6(59,&(65(1'(5('%<%$.(5	+267(7/(5//3

)257+(3(5,2'$8*8677+528*+$8*867

7$6.

&2'( '(6&5,37,21 +2856 $02817

 $VVHW6DOHV6DOHV  

 $XWRPDWLF6WD\  

 %DQNUXSWF\/LWLJDWLRQ  

 %DU'DWH0RWLRQ&ODLPV1RWLFLQJ  

 &DVH$GPLQLVWUDWLRQGRFNHWXSGDWHV:,3DQG

FDOHQGDU  

 &KDSWHU3ODQ3ODQ&RQILUPDWLRQ  

 &RPPLWWHH0HHWLQJVDQG3UHSDUDWLRQ  

 &RUSRUDWHDQG%RDUG,VVXHV  

 (PSOR\HH,VVXHV  

 (TXLW\6HFXULW\+ROGHUV  

 ([FOXVLYLW\  

 ([HFXWRU\&RQWUDFWV/HDVH,VVXHV  



*HQHUDO&DVH6WUDWHJ\LQFOXGHVFRPPXQLFDWLRQVZLWK

&RPPLWWHH  

 +HDULQJVDQG&RXUW0DWWHUV  

 /HJLVODWLYH,VVXHV  

 1RQ%DQNUXSWF\/LWLJDWLRQ  

 1RQ:RUNLQJ7UDYHO  

 'LVWULFW&RXUW/LWLJDWLRQ  

 5HJXODWRU\,VVXHVLQFOXGLQJ&38&DQG)(5&  

 5HWHQWLRQ$SSOLFDWLRQV  

 )HH$SSOLFDWLRQ%DNHU  

 )HH$SSOLFDWLRQ2WKHU3URIHVVLRQDOV  

 6FKHGXOHV6WDWHPHQWRI)LQDQFLDO$IIDLUV  

 867UXVWHH)HH([DPLQHU,VVXHV  

 8QVHFXUHG&UHGLWRU,VVXHV&RPPXQLFDWLRQV0HHWLQJV  

 8WLOLW\,VVXHV$GHTXDWH$VVXUDQFH,QVXUDQFH  

 :LWKGUDZ5HIHUHQFH  

 5HDO(VWDWHDQG5HDO3URSHUW\,VVXHV  

 $YRLGDQFH$FWLRQ$QDO\VLV/LHQ$YRLGDQFH$QDO\VLV  

 ,QYHVWLJDWLRQV  

 )LQDQFLDO$GYLVRUV  

 2WKHU&RQWHVWHG0DWWHUV  

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4037-2 Filed: 09/30/19 Entered: 09/30/19 13:36:44 Page 1

of 2
























































BAKER 

&

HOSTETLER LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

LOS 

ANGELES



7$6.

&2'( '(6&5,37,21 +2856 $02817

 2SHUDWLRQV  

 .(,3,VVXHV  

 6XEURJDWLRQ  

 :LOGILUH$VVLVWDQFH)XQG  

 $VVHW$QDO\VLVDQG5HFRYHU\  

 7RUW&ODLPV(VWLPDWLRQ  

 &ODVV&ODLPV,VVXHV  

727$/  

 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4037-2 Filed: 09/30/19 Entered: 09/30/19 13:36:44 Page 2

of 2
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5438 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax 

on indoor tanning services. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 10, 2014 

Mr. GRIMM (for himself and Mr. PETERSON) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

the excise tax on indoor tanning services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tanning Tax Repeal 

5 Act of 2014’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF EXCISE TAX ON INDOOR TANNING 

7 SERVICES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subtitle D of the Internal Rev9 enue Code of 1986 is amended by striking chapter 49 and 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5438 IH

1 by striking the item relating to such chapter in the table 

2 of chapters of such subtitle. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 this section shall apply to services performed after the 

5 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Defense Policy Board, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Defense Policy Board will meet in closed session on June 23 and 24, 2010, at the Pentagon.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on June 23, 2010, from 0730 hrs until 1800 hrs and on June 24, 2010, from 0730 hrs until 1030 hrs.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Pentagon.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Ann Hansen, 703-571-9232.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The purpose of the meeting is to provide the Secretary of Defense, Deputy Secretary of Defense and Under Secretary of Defense for Policy with independent, informed advice on major matters of defense policy. The Board will hold classified discussions on national security matters.

In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App II (1982)), it has been determined that this meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552B(c)(1)(1982), and that accordingly this meeting will be closed to the public.

Dated: June 2, 2010.

Mitchell S. Bryman,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2010-13532 Filed 6-4-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Stephen B. Waters, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of HCW Pension Real Estate Fund Limited Partnership;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 7, 2007

/s/Stephen B. Waters

Stephen B. Waters

Vice President of IH, Inc., equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership
#### John Sutherland v. The City of Brooklyn, Impleaded with Others.

Order reversing judgment and granting; new trial, with costs to-the appellant to abide the event. Signed.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4398-1 Filed: 10/22/19 Entered: 10/22/19 18:24:33 Page 1

of 5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4398-1 Filed: 10/22/19 Entered: 10/22/19 18:24:33 Page 2

of 5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4398-1 Filed: 10/22/19 Entered: 10/22/19 18:24:33 Page 3

of 5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4398-1 Filed: 10/22/19 Entered: 10/22/19 18:24:33 Page 4

of 5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4398-1 Filed: 10/22/19 Entered: 10/22/19 18:24:33 Page 5

of 5
#### Julia Elgie, Respondent, v. The City of Troy, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Learned, P. J.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 32458]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13555]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY



Federal Energy Regulatory Commission



[Docket No. EL10-69-000]




Virginia Electric and Power Company v. PJM Interconnection, LLC; 

Notice of Complaint



May 28, 2010.

    Take notice that on May 25, 2010, pursuant to Rule 206 of the Rules 

of Practice and Procedure of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

(Commission), 18 CFR 385.206, Virginia Electric and Power Company 

(Complainant) filed a formal complaint against PJM Interconnection, LLC 

(Respondent), alleging that the Respondent erroneously changed its load 

forecast model for 2010 for the Dominion zone.

    Complainant certifies that copies of the complaint were served on 

the contacts for the Respondent, as listed on the Commission's list of 

Corporate Officials.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 

file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 

considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 

be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 

proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 

intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent's 

answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before 

the comment date. The Respondent's answer, motions to intervene, and 

protests must be served on the Complainants.

    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 

interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 

20426.

    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 

Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 

link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 

notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 

assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 

<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a3e5e6f1e0eccdcfcacdc6f0d6d3d3ccd1d7e3c5c6d1c08dc4ccd5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="14525146575b7a787d7a71476164647b666054727166773a737b62">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 

TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on June 14, 2010.



Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-13555 Filed 6-7-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P




</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   PAGE 18 OF 18

                                                                      EXHIBIT 99


          October 4, 1999                               Tammy Hubacek
                               MET-COIL REPORTS:
                    PROFITABLE FIRST QUARTER FOR FISCAL 2000

     CEDAR RAPIDS, IA -  Met-Coil Systems Corporation (METS) announces a
profitable first quarter.  Met-Coil achieved increases in revenues, operating
income, net income, and backlog for the three months ended August 31, 1999,
compared to the quarter ended August 31,1998. Met-Coil's President and Chief
Operating Officer, James D. Heitt, stated, "We are extremely pleased with the
income for the first quarter.  The Company has demonstrated improvements in
operating strength for each quarter during the past two years."

FIRST QUARTER RESULTS

     Revenues for the first quarter of fiscal 2000 were $12.8 million compared
to $10.4 million in the first quarter of fiscal 1999.  Gross margin for the
quarter was 28.9%, compared to 25.4% for the first quarter of last year.  High
gross margin was generated in the first quarter due to shipment of several
custom-engineered orders.

     Income before taxes for the first quarter was $1.5 million compared to
$602,000 for the first quarter of fiscal 1999.  Net income for the first
quarter was $970,000 after tax expense, or $.21 diluted earnings per share.
Last year the Company reported first quarter net income of $867,000, or $.21
diluted earnings per share, which included tax credits of $265,000.  Interest
expense for the quarter fell 53% from $293,000 for the prior year period to
$137,000 due to reduced levels of debt and lower interest rates under the
Company's new credit facility.  The Company's order backlog at August 31, 1999
was $18.8 million, compared to $18.1 million last year.

     In September 1999 the Company notified its preferred shareholders of its
intent to redeem all outstanding preferred stock on November 17, 1999 at $13 per
share.  There were 262,840 shares of preferred stock outstanding as of August
31, 1999. Prior to November 17, 1999 holders of the preferred stock have the
right to convert each share of preferred stock into three shares of Met-Coil's
common stock by notifying the Company.

     The Shareholders Annual Meeting will be held at 10:00 a.m.  Wednesday,
October 6, 1999 at the Crowne Plaza Five Seasons Hotel in Cedar Rapids, Iowa to
elect two directors and ratify the appointment of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP as
the Company's independent auditors.

     Met-Coil is a supplier of advanced sheet metal forming equipment,
fabricating equipment and glass processing technologies for the global market.
The Company markets its machinery and metal fabrication systems primarily
through a worldwide distributor network.  Met-Coil is headquartered in Cedar
Rapids, Iowa.  Its operating units include Iowa Precision Industries, Inc.,
also in Cedar Rapids, and The Lockformer Company in Lisle, Illinois.



                                # # # END # # #