alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

 

 ) 

In re: ) Chapter 11 

 ) 

 ) Case No. 19-30088 

PG&E CORPORATION, ) 

 ) 

Debtor. ) 

 ) 

 ) 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND REQUEST FOR 

SERVICE OF ALL NOTICES AND PLEADINGS 

 In accordance with Rule 9010(b) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy, please enter the 

appearance of Jennifer V. Doran and the law firm of Hinckley, Allen & Snyder LLP, as counsel 

for Telvent USA, LLC. The undersigned requests that notices of all matters be served as 

follows: 

 Jennifer V. Doran, Esq. 

 Hinckley, Allen & Snyder LLP 

 28 State Street 

 Boston, MA 02109 

 Telephone: (617) 345-9000 

 Facsimile: (617) 345-9020 

 Email: jdoran@hinckleyallen.com 

 Request is hereby made for copies of all notices, papers and orders required to be given or 

served in accordance with Rule 2002 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and, in 

addition, copies of all pleadings, notices or applications, motions, petitions, requests, complaints 

or demands, whether formal or informal, whether written or oral, and whether transmitted or 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 354 Filed: 02/07/19 Entered: 02/07/19 05:08:39 Page 1 of 2
58399045 v1 2

conveyed by mail delivery, facsimile, telephone, telegram, telex or otherwise, which affect the 

Debtor or the property of the Debtor filed by any party in the above-captioned case. 

TELVENT USA, LLC 

 

 By their attorneys, 

 /s/ Jennifer V. Doran 

 Jennifer V. Doran 

 Hinckley, Allen & Snyder LLP 

 28 State Street 

 Boston, MA 02109-1775 

 (617) 345-9000 (Phone) 

 (617) 345-9020 (Fax) 

 jdoran@hinckleyallen.com 

Dated: February 7, 2019 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I, Jennifer V. Doran, hereby certify that on this 7th day of February, 2019, I caused to be 

served a copy of the Notice of Appearance and Request for Service of All Notices and Pleadings, 

filed herewith, to the parties listed on the Court’s Electronic Service List. 

 

 

 /s/ Jennifer V. Doran 

 Jennifer V. Doran 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 354 Filed: 02/07/19 Entered: 02/07/19 05:08:39 Page 2 of 2
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5333 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to ensure that a service animal 

of a patient receiving inpatient medical care at a medical facility of 

the Department of Veterans Affairs is able to access the room of the 

patient. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 31, 2014 

Mr. DAINES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to ensure that a 

service animal of a patient receiving inpatient medical 

care at a medical facility of the Department of Veterans 

Affairs is able to access the room of the patient. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Expanding Access for 

5 Veterans’ Service Animals Act’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 5333 IH

1 SEC. 2. ACCESS OF SERVICE ANIMALS AT MEDICAL FACILI2 TIES OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AF3 FAIRS. 

4 (a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con5 gress that— 

6 (1) certified therapeutic animals should be pro7 vided the same access to facilities of the Department 

8 of Veterans Affairs as service animals; and 

9 (2) to ensure such access, the Secretary of Vet10 erans Affairs should create and implement a certifi11 cation process for therapeutic animals that mitigate 

12 the effects of a medically diagnosed mental health 

13 condition. 

14 (b) ACCESS OF SERVICE ANIMALS TO MEDICAL FA15 CILITIES.—Section 901(f) of title 38, United States Code, 

16 is amended— 

17 (1) by redesignating paragraph (2) as para18 graph (3); and 

19 (2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the fol20 lowing new paragraph (2): 

21 ‘‘(2)(A) Except as provided by subparagraph (B), the 

22 Secretary may not prohibit a covered service dog, or any 

23 other service animal that is allowed to access medical fa24 cilities of the Department, of a patient who is receiving 

25 inpatient care at a medical facility of the Department from 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•HR 5333 IH

1 accessing the room of the patient, including with respect 

2 to staying overnight. 

3 ‘‘(B) In carrying out subparagraph (A), the Secretary 

4 may prescribe regulations to ensure the safety and health 

5 of employees of the Department, patients, and the public, 

6 including by requiring that a patient maintain responsi7 bility for the covered service dog or service animal.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
April 24, 2012



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

EMS USA, INC. , Appellant

NO. 14

- 10

- 01037

- CV V.

EPOXY DESIGN SYSTEMS , INC. , Appellee

____________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, EPOXY DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC. , signed July 29, 2010, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

. We order appellant, EMS USA, INC. , to pay all c osts incurred in this appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MELVIN BRYANT, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-842

[July 26, 2018]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County; Cynthia L. Cox, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 31-2013-CF-000388 A.

Melvin Bryant, Jr., Raiford, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, MAY and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Page 15 of 18



MET-COIL SYSTEMS CORPORATION                 
EXHIBIT 11 - COMPUTATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED
   EARNINGS PER SHARE                        
(In thousands, except per share amounts)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                             Three Months Ended    Nine Months Ended
                                                                                 February 28,         February  28,
                                                                                1998       1997        1998      1997

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                          <C>        <C>         <C>       <C>
Common shares outstanding, beginning of period                                3,116      3,127       3,152     3,031

Weighted average of common shares issued (purchased)                              1         12         (29)       97
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING (BASIC)                                 3,117      3,139       3,123     3,128
=======================================================================================================================

Weighted average of dilutive shares attributable to:
  Stock options granted, computed using the treasury stock method                77          0          69         0
  Convertible preferred stock, computed using the "if converted" method           0          0           0         0
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES (DILUTED)                                 3,194      3,139       3,192     3,128
=======================================================================================================================

Net income (loss)                                                              $437    ($1,242)     $1,276     ($513)
Preferred stock dividends and accretion                                         160        117         480       351
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income (loss) applicable to common stock                                   $277    ($1,359)       $796     ($864)
=======================================================================================================================

Earnings (loss) per share:
  Basic                                                                       $0.09     ($0.43)      $0.25    ($0.28)
  Diluted                                                                     $0.09     ($0.43)      $0.25    ($0.28)
</TABLE>
Entered on Docket 

February 05, 2019

EDWARD J. EMMONS, CLERK 

U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 311 Filed: 02/05/19 Entered: 02/05/19 15:27:24 Page 1 of 1
22

- 2318 Tavenner v. Int’l Bus. Machs

. Corp.


## UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT


# SUMMARY ORDER

RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT ’ S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WI TH THE NOTATION “ SUMMARY ORDER ” ). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL.
At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 1 held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of 2 New York, on the 4 t h d a y of A u g u s t , two thousand twenty

- three

. 3 4 PRESENT: 5 ROSEMARY S. PO OLER , 6 RICHARD C. WESLEY , 7 MICHAEL H. PARK , 8 Circuit Judges. 9

_____________________________________ 10 11 Deborah Tavenner , 12 13 Plaintiff

- Appellant , 14 15

v. 16 17 International Business Machines Corporation, 22

- 2318 18 19 Defendant

- Appellee

. 20

_____________________________________ 21 22 FOR PLAINTIFF

- APPELLANT : S HANNON L ISS

- R IORDAN ( Thomas Fowler
, 23 on the brief ) , Lichten & Liss

- Riordan, P.C., 24 Boston, MA

. 25 26 FOR DEFENDANT

- APPELL EE : T RACI L. L OVITT , Jones Day ( Anthony J. 27 Dick, Jones Day, Washington, DC; Matthew 28 W. Lampe, Erika D. Cagney, Jones Day, 29 New York, NY; J. Benjamin Aguiñaga, 30 Jones Day, Dallas, TX
, on the brief )
, New 31 York, NY

. 322 Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern Di strict of 1
New York ( Karas , J

. ). 2

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND 3

DECREED that the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED and Plaintiff’s motion to unseal 4

is DENIED

. 5

Plaintiff is a former employee of International Business Machines Corporation (“IBM”)
, 6

who sued to invalidate two provisions in the arbitration agreement she signed when she was 7

terminated

. On appeal, Plaintiff raises substantially the same issues as the plaintiffs in several 8
related appe als

. 1 We affirm for substantially the same reasons stated by the district court in its 9

decision
, see Tavenner v. Int ’ l Bus. Machs

. Corp. , No. 21

- CV

- 6345 , 2022 WL 4449215 (S.D.N.Y. 10
Sept. 23 , 2022)
, and for the reasons stated in our opinion i n the related appeal, In re IBM Arb

. 11
Agreement Litig

. , No. 22

- 1728 (2d Cir. Aug. 4 , 2023)

. 12

We have considered all of Plaintiff ’ s arguments and find them to be without merit. For 13
the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED

. Pl aintiff ’ s motion to 14

unseal is DENIED as moot

. 15

FOR THE COURT: 16 Catherine O ’ Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of Court 17 18

1 See In re IBM Arb

. Agreement Litig

. , No. 22

- 1728; Chandler v. Int’l Bus. Machs

. Corp. , No. 22

- 1733 ; Lodi v. Int’l Bus. Machs

. Corp. , No. 22

- 1737

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                              19
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            1612
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       2363
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                          20190
<ALLOWANCE>                                         51
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   24735
<DEPOSITS>                                       18832
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                 71
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          3660
<OTHER-SE>                                        2172
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                   24735
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   1124
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    0
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    78
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  1284
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 788
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 788
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              496
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    392
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    109
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         109
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        76
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.30
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                        28
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    58
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                    51
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                   51
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                51
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Accompanying annual report on Form 10-K
of
greenlight capital re, Ltd.
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. SS.SS. 1350)

I, Tim Courtis, hereby certify that the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 of Greenlight Capital Re, Ltd., fully complies with the applicable reporting requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and that the information contained in such annual report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Greenlight Capital Re, Ltd.

Date: March 18, 2008


/s/ Tim CourtisName: Tim Courtis
Title:    Chief Financial Officer


---
#### John I. Tilton, Appellant, v. Susan M. Vail and others, Respondents.

Order affirmed, with costs to abide event.

Opinion by

Brady, J.
#### Julia C. Chapin, Respondent, v. Hopkins H. Meloon and others, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, without costs if plaintiff stipulate to deduct $á50 and interest Irom August 30, 1880; otherwi-e reversed, with no costs to either party on appeal, and new trial granted ; referee discharged, other costs to abide event. Opinion by

Learned, P. J.
EX-10.1






UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION




	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 
	 	 
	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

	 	 
	 	No.
	v.

	 	 
	 	 
	LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC.

	 	 
	 	Judge






AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO DEFERRED PROSECUTION AGREEMENT




Defendant LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC. (“LAWSON PRODUCTS”), a company headquartered in Des Plaines,
Illinois, by its undersigned attorneys, pursuant to authority granted by its Board of Directors,
and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, through PATRICK J. FITZGERALD, United States Attorney for the
Northern District of Illinois, enter into this Amendment No. 1 dated July 31, 2009 to Deferred
Prosecution Agreement (this “Amendment”), which shall apply to LAWSON PRODUCTS and all its
affiliates and subsidiaries, including Drummond American Corporation and Cronatron Welding Systems,
Inc. and which amends the Deferred Prosecution Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of August 11,
2008.



1. Paragraph 2 of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated to read in its entirety as
follows:




“3. LAWSON PRODUCTS agrees to place a total of $30,000,000 in an escrow account to
fund the payment of restitution and a civil forfeiture judgment as further set forth below.
LAWSON PRODUCTS shall make the first $10,000,000 payment on or before the date that LAWSON
PRODUCTS executes this Agreement. LAWSON PRODUCTS shall make a $5,000,000 payment on or
before August 15, 2009 and a further $5,000,000 payment on or before December 31, 2009.
LAWSON PRODUCTS shall make its final $10,000,000 payment on or before August 11, 2010. At
any point, should a controlling interest in LAWSON PRODUCTS be sold, the remaining payments
shall be accelerated and due at the closing of that sale.”



2.  This Amendment shall be considered an amendment to and a part of the Agreement.



3.  Except as specifically stated herein, all terms, covenants and conditions of the Agreement
shall remain in full force and effect.



1



AGREED:



For LAWSON PRODUCTS:



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
 
	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 
	/s/ Thomas J. Neri

 

THOMAS J. NERI

	 	 
	 	/s/ William D. Heinz

 

WILLIAM D. HEINZ
	 	



 
	 	



 
	President and Chief

Executive Officer

	 	

 
	 	

Jenner & Block LLP
	 	

 
	 	

 
	Lawson Products, Inc.

	 	 
	 	Counsel for Lawson Products, Inc.
	 	 
	 	 
	 

	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	For the UNITED STATES OF

AMERICA:

	 	

 
	 	

 
	 	

 
	 	

 
	
 
	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 
	/s/ Patrick J. Fitzgerald

 

PATRICK J. FITZGERALD

	 	 
	 	/s/ Brandon D. Fox

 

BRANDON D. FOX
	 	



 
	 	



 
	United States Attorney

	 	 
	 	NANCY MILLER
	 	 
	 	 
	 

	 	 
	 	KRUTI TRIVEDI
	 	 
	 	 
	 

	 	 
	 	Assistant United States Attorneys
	 	 
	 	 







2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7648

STEVE CARL CHADWICK-EL, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. VERIZON WIRELESS, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:09- cv-01490-RWT)

Submitted: January 19, 2010 Decided: January 27, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steve Carl Chadwick-el, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Steve Carl Chadwick-el seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his civil action against Verizon Wireless. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on June 25, 2009. The notice of appeal was filed on or about August 11, 2009. * Thus, the notice of appeal was filed outside the thirty-day appeal period. Because Chadwick-el failed to

* Because Chadwick-el is incarcerated, he is deemed to have filed the notice of appeal the date he deposited it in the prison mail system. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1). However, the notice of appeal does not contain a declaration or notarized statement reflecting that date, as required by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(c)(1), and the post-mark date is illegible. In determining the filing date, we have afforded Chadwick-el the presumption that he tendered the notice of appeal on August 11, 2009, five business days prior to this court’s August 18, 2009 receipt thereof.3 file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

PATRICK JOSEPH MCLAINE, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 949 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 11th day of May, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanced Battery Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-QSB/A (Amendment No. 1) for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Zhiguo Fu, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Advanced Battery Technologies, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Advanced Battery Technologies, Inc. as of and for the period covered by the Report.  Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, this certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed. Dated:  June 21, 2007/s/ Zhiguo Fu
Zhiguo Fu 
Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Lightlake Therapeutics Inc. (the"Company") for the year ended July 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Dr. Roger Crystal, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: December 10, 2010


By: /s/ Dr. Roger Crystal


Dr. Roger Crystal


Chief Executive Officer








This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.