Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 106 / Thursday, June 3, 2010 / Notices 31433 

information; search data sources; 

complete and review the collection of 

information; and transmit or otherwise 

disclose the information. 

Respondents/Affected Entities: 

Entities potentially affected by this 

action are companies that manufacture, 

process, use, import or distribute in 

commerce chemical substances that are 

subject to reporting requirements under 

sections 4, 8(d) or 8(e) of TSCA, or are 

subject to voluntary reporting under the 

Voluntary Children’s Chemical 

Evaluation Program (VCCEP). 

Frequency of Collection: On occasion. 

Estimated average number of 

responses for each respondent: 1.46. 

Estimated No. of Respondents: 831. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden on 

Respondents: 607 hours. 

Estimated Total Annual Costs: 

$35,716. 

Changes in Burden Estimates: There 

is a decrease of 454.5 hours (from 1,061 

hours to 607 hours) in the total 

estimated respondent burden compared 

with that identified in the information 

collection most recently approved by 

OMB. This reflects a decrease in the 

estimated number of submissions, 

continuing the trend that was reported 

in the prior ICR renewal. 

Dated: May 27, 2010. 

John Moses, 

Director, Collection Strategies Division. 

[FR Doc. 2010–13385 Filed 6–2–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[FRL–9158–8] 

Science Advisory Board Staff Office; 

Notification of a Public Meeting of the 

SAB Lead Review Panel 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The EPA Science Advisory 

Board (SAB) Staff Office announces a 

public meeting of the SAB Lead Review 

Panel to provide a consultation on 

EPA’s draft technical analyses that will 

be used to support the development of 

lead-based paint dust hazard standards. 

DATES: There will be a public meeting 

held on July 6, 2010 from 9 a.m. to 

5 p.m. (Eastern Time) and July 7, 2010 

from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. (Eastern Time). 

ADDRESSES: The face-to-face meeting on 

July 6–7, 2010 will be held at the St. 

Regis Washington, 923 16th Street, NW., 

Washington, DC 20006; telephone 

(202) 638–2626. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Any 

member of the public wishing to obtain 

information concerning the public 

meeting may contact Mr. Aaron Yeow, 

Designated Federal Officer (DFO), EPA 

Science Advisory Board Staff Office 

(1400F), U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, 

NW., Washington, DC 20460; by 

telephone/voice mail at (202) 343–9878 

or at yeow.aaron@epa.gov. General 

information about the SAB, as well as 

any updates concerning the meeting 

announced in this notice, may be found 

on the EPA Web site at http:// 

www.epa.gov/sab. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant 

to the Federal Advisory Committee Act 

(FACA), 5 U.S.C., App. 2, notice is 

hereby given that the SAB Lead Review 

Panel will hold a public face-to-face 

meeting to provide a consultation on 

EPA’s draft technical analyses that will 

be used to support the development of 

lead-based paint dust hazard standards. 

The SAB was established pursuant to 42 

U.S.C. 4365 to provide independent 

scientific and technical advice to the 

Administrator on the technical basis for 

Agency positions and regulations. The 

SAB is a Federal Advisory Committee 

chartered under FACA. The SAB will 

comply with the provisions of FACA 

and all appropriate SAB Staff Office 

procedural policies. 

Background: Human exposure to lead 

may cause a variety of adverse health 

effects, particularly in children. EPA’s 

Office of Pollution Prevention and 

Toxics (OPPT) regulates toxic 

substances, such as lead, through the 

Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). 

In 2001, EPA established standards for 

lead-based paint hazards, which include 

lead in residential dust. OPPT is 

developing draft technical analyses that 

will be used to support possible revision 

of existing residential lead-based paint 

dust hazard standards and the 

development of lead-based paint dust 

hazard standards for public and 

commercial buildings. In the future, 

EPA will also develop draft technical 

analyses to support the development of 

lead-safe work practice standards for 

renovations of public and commercial 

buildings. OPPT has requested that the 

SAB conduct a review of these draft 

technical analyses. 

In response to OPPT’s request, the 

SAB Staff Office solicited nominations 

of experts [Federal Register Notice 

dated February 5, 2010 (75 FR 6030– 

6031)] and formed a review panel for 

Lead. The panel will provide an initial 

consultation on EPA’s draft technical 

analyses which will be used to support 

the development of lead-based paint 

dust hazard standards, followed by a 

peer review of these technical analyses 

later in the year. In the future, the panel 

will also review other EPA draft 

technical analyses that will be used to 

support the development of lead-safe 

work practice standards for renovations 

of public and commercial buildings. For 

this initial consultation, the panel is 

being asked to provide 

recommendations on the draft approach 

for developing the hazard standards for 

floors and window sills in residences 

and public and commercial buildings 

including: Selection of health 

endpoint(s), estimation of lead 

concentrations in environmental media, 

lead exposure assessment, conversion of 

dust loading to dust concentration, and 

blood lead modeling. 

Availability of Meeting Materials: 

Agendas and materials in support of this 

meeting will be placed on the EPA Web 

site at http://www.epa.gov/sab in 

advance of the meeting. For technical 

questions and information concerning 

EPA’s draft document, please contact 

Dr. Jennifer Seed at (202) 564–7634, or 

seed.jennifer@epa.gov. 

Procedures for Providing Public Input: 

Public comment for consideration by 

EPA’s federal advisory committees and 

panels has a different purpose from 

public comment provided to EPA 

program offices. Therefore, the process 

for submitting comments to a federal 

advisory committee is different from the 

process used to submit comments to an 

EPA program office. 

Federal advisory committees and 

panels, including scientific advisory 

committees, provide independent 

advice to EPA. Members of the public 

can submit comments for a federal 

advisory committee to consider as it 

develops advice for EPA. They should 

send their comments directly to the 

Designated Federal Officer for the 

relevant advisory committee. Oral 

Statements: In general, individuals or 

groups requesting an oral presentation 

at a public face-to-face meeting will be 

limited to five minutes, with no more 

than a total of one hour for all speakers. 

Each person making an oral statement 

should consider providing written 

comments as well as their oral statement 

so that the points presented orally can 

be expanded upon in writing. Interested 

parties should contact Mr. Aaron Yeow, 

DFO, in writing (preferably via e-mail) 

at the contact information noted above 

by June 29, 2010 for the face-to-face 

meeting, to be placed on the list of 

public speakers. Written Statements: 

Written statements should be supplied 

to the DFO via email at the contact 

information noted above by June 29, 

2010 for the face-to-face meeting so that 


sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
31434 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 106 / Thursday, June 3, 2010 / Notices 

the information may be made available 

to the Panel members for their 

consideration. Written statements 

should be supplied in one of the 

following electronic formats: Adobe 

Acrobat PDF, MS Word, MS 

PowerPoint, or Rich Text files in IBM– 

PC/Windows 98/2000/XP format. 

Submitters are requested to provide 

versions of signed documents, 

submitted with and without signatures, 

because the SAB Staff Office does not 

publish documents with signatures on 

its Web sites. 

Accessibility: For information on 

access or services for individuals with 

disabilities, please contact Mr. Aaron 

Yeow at (202) 343–9878 or 

yeow.aaron@epa.gov. To request 

accommodation of a disability, please 

contact Mr. Yeow preferably at least ten 

days prior to each meeting to give EPA 

as much time as possible to process 

your request. 

Dated: May 26, 2010, 

Anthony F. Maciorowski, 

Deputy Director, EPA Science Advisory Staff 

Office. 

[FR Doc. 2010–13386 Filed 6–2–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

Notice of Public Information 

Collection(s) Being Submitted for 

Review and Approval to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB), 

Comments Requested 

May 24, 2010. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications 

Commission, as part of its continuing 

effort to reduce paperwork burden 

invites the general public and other 

Federal agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on the 

following information collection(s), as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act (PRA) of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501 – 

3520. Comments are requested 

concerning: (a) whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the Commission, including 

whether the information shall have 

practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the 

Commission’s burden estimate; (c) ways 

to enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information collected; (d) 

ways to minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on the 

respondents, including the use of 

automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology; 

and (e) ways to further reduce the 

information collection burden for small 

business concerns with fewer than 25 

employees. 

The FCC may not conduct or sponsor 

a collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid control 

number. No person shall be subject to 

any penalty for failing to comply with 

a collection of information subject to the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that 

does not display a currently valid OMB 

control number. 

DATES: Written Paperwork Reduction 

Act (PRA) comments should be 

submitted on or before July 6, 2010. If 

you anticipate that you will be 

submitting PRA comments, but find it 

difficult to do so within the period of 

time allowed by this notice, you should 

advise the FCC contact listed below as 

soon as possible. 

ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to 

Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of 

Management and Budget, via fax at 202– 

395–5167 or via the Internet at 

Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov and 

to the Federal Communications 

Commission via email to PRA@fcc.gov. 

To view a copy of this information 

collection request (ICR) submitted to 

OMB: (1) Go to the web page http:// 

reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain, (2) 

look for the section of the web page 

called ‘‘Currently Under Review’’, (3) 

click on the downward–pointing arrow 

in the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box below the 

‘‘Currently Under Review’’ heading, (4) 

select ‘‘Federal Communications 

Commission’’ from the list of agencies 

presented in the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box, 

(5) click the ‘‘Submit’’ button to the right 

of the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box, and (6) 

when the list of FCC ICRs currently 

under review appears, look for the title 

of this ICR (or its OMB Control Number, 

if there is one) and then click on the ICR 

Reference Number to view detailed 

information about this ICR. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Judith B. Herman, Office of Managing 

Director, (202) 418–0214. For additional 

information or copies of the information 

collection(s), contact Judith B. Herman, 

OMD, 202–418–0214 or email judith– 

b.herman@fcc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

OMB Control Number: 3060–0742. 

Title: Sections 52.21 through 52.33, 

Telephone Number Portability (47 CFR 

Part 52, Subpart C) and CC Docket No. 

95–116. 

Form Number: N/A. 

Type of Review: Revision of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents: Business or other for– 

profit. 

Number of Respondents and 

Responses: 3,616 respondents; 

10,001,890 responses. 

Estimated Time per Response: 4 

minutes – 410 hours. 

Frequency of Response: One time and 

on occasion reporting requirements and 

recordkeeping requirement. 

Obligation to Respond: Required to 

obtain or retain benefits. Statutory 

authority for this information collection 

is contained in 47 U.S.C. section 1, 2, 

3, 251 and 332 of the Communications 

Act of 1934, as amended. 

Total Annual Burden: 672,516 hours. 

Total Annual Cost: $13,424,320. 

Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A. 

Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: 

The Commission is not requesting that 

respondents submit confidential 

information to the Commission. If the 

Commission requests respondents to 

submit information which the 

respondents believe is confidential, 

respondents may request confidential 

treatment under 47 CFR 0.459 of the 

Commission rules. 

Needs and Uses: The Commission 

will submit this expiring information 

collection (IC) as a revision to the Office 

of Management and Budget (OMB) to 

obtain the full three year clearance from 

them. The Commission has changed the 

reporting requirements and significantly 

increased the estimated hour and cost 

burdens. This increase is based on 1,626 

carriers that engage in simple 

intermodal and wireline–to–wireline 

ports. We estimate that 1,626 carriers 

will complete an average of 6,150 ports 

per year with an average of 410 hours 

per response which results in 666,666 

hours of additional burden to this IC 

and $13,333,320 in additional annual 

costs. 

The Commission is revising this IC by 

adding standardized local service 

request data fields. Section 251(b)(2) of 

the Telecommunications Act of 1996 

requires LECs to ‘‘provide, to the extent 

technically feasible, number portability 

in accordance with requirements 

prescribed by the Commission.’’ 

Through the Local Number Portability 

(LNP) process, consumers have the 

ability to retain their phone number 

when switching telecommunications 

service providers, enabling them to 

choose a provider that best suits their 

needs and enhancing competition. In 

the Porting Internal Order and Further 

Notice, the Commission mandated a one 

business day porting interval for simple 

wireline–to–wireline and intermodal 

port requests. The information collected 

in the standard local service request 

data fields is necessary to complete 

simple wireline–to–wireline and 

intermodal ports within the one 

business day porting interval mandated 

by the Commission and will be used to 


sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES