alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Geospatial Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended
December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Mark A Smith, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                   |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------- |  | -----------------------
|                     |  |  |  |    
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: April 15, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Mark A. Smith
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Name:             |  | Mark A. Smith          
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Title:            |  | Chief Executive Officer
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
 
 
 CER Generation, LLC
Docket No. EG10-18-000Day County Wind, LLC
Docket No. EG10-19-000Northeastern Power Company
Docket No. EG10-20-000EC&R Papalote Creek II, LLC
Docket No. EG10-22-000EDF EN Canada Inc.
Docket No. FC10-1-000
 Take notice that during the month of April 2010, the status of the above-captioned entities as Exempt Wholesale Generators or Foreign Utility Companies became effective by operation of the Commission's regulations, 18 CFR 366.7(a). Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary.


[FR Doc. 2010-13556 Filed 6-7-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 236 (Friday, December 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 63032]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-29948]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. ER95-1838-000]

PacifiCorp; Notice of Filing

December 4, 1995.
    Take notice that on November 8, 1995 and November 14, 1995 Black 
Hills Power & Light Company tendered for filing amendments in the 
above-referenced docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before December 14, 1995. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-29948 Filed 12-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
#### In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Owen J. Malone, as Administrator, etc., of Catharine Grimes, Deceased. In the Matter of the Kinship of Frederick W. Law, as Executor of John Nolan, Deceased, Appellant, v. The People of the State of New York, Respondent.

Motion for reargument denied.
%$.(5

	

+267(7/(5//3

$77251(<6$7/$:

/26

$1*(/(6

127,&(3$57,(6

3*	(&RUSRUDWLRQ

FR3DFLILF*DV	(OHFWULF&RPSDQ\

$WWQ -DQHW/RGXFD(VT

%HDOH6WUHHW

6DQ)UDQFLVFR&$

.HOOHU	%HQYHQXWWL//3

$WWQ 7RELDV6.HOOHU(VT

-DQH.LP(VT

&DOLIRUQLD6WUHHW6XLWH

6DQ)UDQFLVFR&$

7KH2IILFHRIWKH8QLWHG6WDWHV7UXVWHHIRU5HJLRQ

$WWQ -DPHV/6Q\GHU(VT

7LPRWK\/DIIUHGL(VT

*ROGHQ*DWH$YHQXHWK)ORRU6XLWH

6DQ)UDQFLVFR&$

0LOEDQN//3

$WWQ 'HQQLV)'XQQH(VT

6DP$.KDOLO(VT

+XGVRQ<DUGV

1HZ<RUN1<

0LOEDQN//3

$WWQ 3DXO6$URQ]RQ(VT

*UHJRU\$%UD\(VT

7KRPDV5.UHOOHU(VT

&HQWXU\3DUN(DVWUG)ORRU

/RV$QJHOHV&$

:HLO*RWVKDO	0DQJHV//3

$WWQ6WHSKHQ.DURWNLQ(VT

-HVVLFD/LRX(VT

0DWWKHZ*RUHQ(VT

)LIWK$YHQXH

1HZ<RUN1<

%UXFH$0DUNHOO

)HH([DPLQHU

1)DLUEDQNV&RXUW

6XLWH

&KLFDJR,/

6FRWW+0F1XWW

$WWRUQH\IRUWKH)HH([DPLQHU

:DUUHQ5RDG

6DQ0DWHR&DOLIRUQLD

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4937-6 Filed: 12/02/19 Entered: 12/02/19 14:05:01 Page 1

of 1
#### In the Matter of Gary Farrell, an Attorney, Appellant. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Respondent.

Submitted March 25, 1996;

decided April 4, 1996

Appeal, insofar as it is taken from that portion of the Appellate Division order that denied that portion of appellant Farrell’s cross motion that sought appointment of a Special Master, dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, *sua sponte,*upon the ground that that portion of the order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; appeal otherwise dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, *sua sponte,*upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.

Chief Judge Kaye taking no part.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       373,098
<SECURITIES>                                 236,974
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             612,972
<PP&E>                                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               612,972
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        0
<BONDS>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                     12,100
<OTHER-SE>                                   600,872
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 612,972
<SALES>                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             0
<CGS>                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             115,939
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (115,939)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (115,939)
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (115,939)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (0.01)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2



Certifications



I, Bryant P. Bynum, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Keystone Automotive Operations, Inc., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Keystone Automotive Operations,
Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or
not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: May 16, 2005



|    |  |                             
|--- |  | ----------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ BRYANT P. BYNUM         
|    |  | Bryant P. Bynum             
|    |  | Executive Vice President and
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### Joseph Stern, Respondent, v. Edward R. Ladew and another, Appellants.

— Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Van Brunt, P. J.
#### John Andrews, Respondent, v. Amelia D. Borland and others, Defendants. (John A Schilling, Purchaser, Appellant.)

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
#### Horace B. Claflin and others, Respondents, v. Wesley Milspaw, Appellant

—Judgment affirmed. Opinion by

Barker, J.;

Haight, J., not voting.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5433 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5433

      To prohibit certain assistance to the Palestinian Authority.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 10, 2014

Mr. Stockman (for himself and Mr. Perry) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To prohibit certain assistance to the Palestinian Authority.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Funding Terrorism Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON FOREIGN ASSISTANCE.

    (a) In General.--Except as provided under subsection (b) and 
notwithstanding any other provision of law, no amounts may be obligated 
or expended to provide any direct United States assistance, loan 
guarantee, or debt relief to the Palestinian Authority, or any 
affiliated governing entity or leadership organization.
    (b) Exception.--The prohibition under subsection (a) shall have no 
effect for a fiscal year if the President certifies to Congress during 
that fiscal year that the Palestinian Authority has--
            (1) formally recognized the right of Israel to exist as a 
        Jewish state;
            (2) publicly recognized the state of Israel;
            (3) renounced terrorism;
            (4) purged all individuals with terrorist ties from 
        security services;
            (5) terminated funding of anti-American and anti-Israel 
        incitement;
            (6) publicly pledged to not engage in war with Israel; and
            (7) honored previous diplomatic agreements.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The prohibition under section 2 shall take effect on the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
exv10w5






Exhibit 10.5



Amendment to

Visteon Corporation Non-Employee Director Stock Unit Plan 




June 10, 2009




     Section 4(a) of the Visteon Corporation Non-Employee Director Stock Unit Plan is amended to
add the following paragraph to the end thereof:




“Grants under this section 4(a) shall be suspended effective as of the date of the 2009
Annual Meeting of the Company’s Stockholders and thereafter unless the Plan is otherwise
amended in accordance with section 11.”
#### CARL C. SHARPE v. SHELL EASTERN PETROLEUM PRODUCTS COMPANY, INC., R. B. GANTT and His Wife, ELLA H. GANTT, ALLEN STEELE, and HAROLD BRAWLEY.

(Filed 26 June, 1935.)

Removal of Causes C b — Motion for removal should have been allowed in this case upon petition showing' fraudulent joinder of resident defendants.

Upon the facts alleged in the petition in this case, plaintiff’s motion for removal to the Federal Court should have been allowed for that the facts alleged in the complaint are not sufficient to state a cause of action against the resident defendants, or either of them, and it appearing that the joinder of the resident defendants was fraudulent in that it was made solely to prevent a removal.

Appeal by the defendant Shell Eastern Petroleum Products Company, Inc., from *Sink, J.,*at January Term, 1935, of Ikedell.

Reversed.

This action was heard by the judge of the Superior Court of Iredell County on the appeal of the defendant Shell Eastern Petroleum Products Company, Inc., a nonresident corporation, from an order of the clerk of said court denying the petition of said defendant for its removal from said court to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of North Carolina for trial.

The order of the clerk was affirmed, and the defendant appealed to the Supreme Court of North Carolina.

*Burén Jurney for plaintiff.*

*Scott & Collier and John M. Robinson for defendant.*

*340CoNNOR, J.

There is error in the order of the judge of the Superior Court of Iredell County in affirming the order of the clerk of said court denying the petition of the nonresident defendant in this action for its removal from the Superior Court of Iredell County to the District Court of the United States for the "Western District of North Carolina.

On the facts alleged in its petition, the nonresident defendant is entitled to the removal of this action in accordance with its petition, for the reason that the facts alleged in the complaint are not sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the resident defendants, or either of them. *Brown v. R. R.,*204 N. C., 25, 161 S. E., 479; *Smith v. Ins. Co.,*204 N. C., 770, 169 S. E., 658; *Culp v. Ins. Co.,*202 N. C., 87, 161 S. E., 717.

In *Cox v. Lumber Co.,*193 N. C., 28, 136 S. E., 254, it is said: “The right of removal by a nonresident defendant with whom the plaintiff has joined a resident defendant cannot be defeated, if such joinder is fraudulent, in that the resident defendant has no real connection with the controversy, but was joined as a defendant with the purpose of preventing a removal from the State to the Federal Court. If in such case a resident defendant is joined, the joinder, although fair upon its face, may be shown to be only a sham or fraudulent device to prevent a removal; but the showing must be made by a statement in the petition for removal of facts rightly leading to the conclusion aj>art from the pleader’s deductions. *Swain v. Cooperage Co.,*189 N. C., 528, 127 S. E., 538.”

The order in this action is

Reversed.
#### In the Matter of Effingham L. Holywell, an Attorney.

Matter referred to Hon. William D. Dickey to take 'testimony and report thereon, with *943Ms opinion. Edward A. Preshman, Esq., assigned to conduct the proceedings.

Present — Jenks, P. J., Hirschberg, Burr, Carr and Woodward, JJ.
EXHIBIT A-15 

Exhibit A-15 Page 398

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-16 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page 1

of 22
Exhibit A-15 Page 399

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-16 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page 2

of 22
Exhibit A-15 Page 400

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-16 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page 3

of 22
Exhibit A-15 Page 401

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-16 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page 4

of 22
Exhibit A-15 Page 402

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-16 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page 5

of 22
Exhibit A-15 Page 403

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-16 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page 6

of 22
Exhibit A-15 Page 404

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-16 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page 7

of 22
Exhibit A-15 Page 405

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-16 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page 8

of 22
Exhibit A-15 Page 406

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-16 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page 9

of 22
Exhibit A-15 Page 407

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-16 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

10 of 22
Exhibit A-15 Page 408

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-16 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

11 of 22
Exhibit A-15 Page 409

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-16 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

12 of 22
Exhibit A-15 Page 410

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-16 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

13 of 22
Exhibit A-15 Page 411

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-16 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

14 of 22
Exhibit A-15 Page 412

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-16 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

15 of 22
Exhibit A-15 Page 413

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-16 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

16 of 22
Exhibit A-15 Page 414

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-16 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

17 of 22
Exhibit A-15 Page 415

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-16 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

18 of 22
Exhibit A-15 Page 416

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-16 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

19 of 22
Exhibit A-15 Page 417

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-16 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

20 of 22
Exhibit A-15 Page 418

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-16 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

21 of 22
Exhibit A-15 Page 419

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4903-16 Filed: 11/27/19 Entered: 11/27/19 17:31:51 Page

22 of 22
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EXHIBIT C 

EXPENSE SUMMARY 

FOR THE PERIOD SEPTEMBER 1, 2019 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2019 

EXPENSES AMOUNTS 

Meals $9,757.46* 

Transportation 13,319.35 

Courier/Mail Services 2,833.48 

Duplicating 5,380.10 

Meeting/Deposition Rooms 250.00 

Special Disbursements (including Experts) 1,005,058.83** 

Travel 218,594.48*** 

Total Expenses Requested: $1,255,193.70 

* - Includes $61.47 for Meals incurred in July. 

** - Includes $2,883.50, $3,120.50 and $627.68 for Special Disbursements incurred in April, May and August 

respectively. 

*** - Includes $7,615.45 for Travel incurred in July. Hotel expenses have been capped for reimbursement purposes at 

$600.00/night. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4765-3 Filed: 11/15/19 Entered: 11/15/19 14:26:51 Page 1

of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             577
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,577
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,311
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,569
<PP&E>                                          41,629
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,047
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,743
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,974
<BONDS>                                         23,914
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,089
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,344
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,743
<SALES>                                         18,341
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,341
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,515
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,950
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,926
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    571
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                571
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       571
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. George W. Lake, Appellant.

Conviction and judgment affirmed. Opinion by

Pratt, J. ,