alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1- 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION, 

 - and - 

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY,

 Reorganized Debtors. 

☐ Affects PG&E Corporation 

☐ Affects Pacific Gas and 

 Electric Company 

☒ Affects both Debtors 

* All papers shall be filed in 

the Lead Case, No. 19-30088 (DM).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Bankruptcy Case 

No. 19-30088-DM 

Chapter 11 

Jointly Administered 

ORDER GRANTING APPELLANT SPIRO JANNINGS’ 

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO EXPAND TIME 

 The court has reviewed Appellant’s Motion for Leave to 

Expand Time for Designation of Record and Statement of Issues on 

Appeal and the declaration in support (Dkts. 13726 and 13727) 

filed by Spiro Jannings on May 12, 2023. It is HEREBY ORDERED 

that Mr. Jannings is granted an extension to May 26, 2023, to 

file the Designation of Record and Statement of Issues on 

________________________________________

DENNIS MONTALI

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

Signed and Filed: May 15, 2023

Entered on Docket 

May 15, 2023

EDWARD J. EMMONS, CLERK 

U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13733 Filed: 05/15/23 Entered: 05/15/23 11:54:21 Page 1

of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2- 

Appeal, and any other required documents to perfect the record 

on appeal. 

 The court notes that Mr. Jannings also filed the 

Designation of Record and Statement of Issues on Appeal (Dkt. 

13728) on May 12, 2023. The Clerk is directed to transmit this 

Order and the Designation and Statement to the District Court. 

**END OF ORDER** 

 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13733 Filed: 05/15/23 Entered: 05/15/23 11:54:21 Page 2

of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-3- 

COURT SERVICE LIST 

Spiro Jannings 

1304 Shortridge Ave. Unit C 

San Jose, CA 95116 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13733 Filed: 05/15/23 Entered: 05/15/23 11:54:21 Page 3

of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5401 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5401

    To impose limitations on the immigration status and immigration 
  benefits for Libyan and third country nationals acting on behalf of 
                            Libyan entities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 8, 2014

     Mr. Gowdy (for himself, Mr. Goodlatte, Mr. Chaffetz, and Mr. 
 Farenthold) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To impose limitations on the immigration status and immigration 
  benefits for Libyan and third country nationals acting on behalf of 
                            Libyan entities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting the Homeland Act''.

SEC. 2. LIBYAN AND THIRD COUNTRY NATIONALS ACTING ON BEHALF OF LIBYAN 
              ENTITIES.

    (a) Termination of and Limitation on Status.--Notwithstanding any 
other provision of the immigration laws (as such term is defined in 
section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101)), 
the nonimmigrant status of any Libyan national, or of any other foreign 
national acting on behalf of a Libyan entity, who is engaging in 
aviation maintenance, flight operations, or nuclear-related studies or 
training is terminated.
    (b) Limitation on Benefits.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
the immigration laws (as such term is defined in section 101 of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101)), the following 
benefits will not be available to any Libyan national or any other 
foreign national acting on behalf of a Libyan entity where the purpose 
is to engage in, or seek to obtain aviation maintenance, flight 
operations or nuclear-related studies or training:
            (1) Application for school transfer.
            (2) Application for extension of stay.
            (3) Employment authorization or practical training.
            (4) Request for reinstatement of student status.
            (5) Application for change of nonimmigrant status.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Financial
Statements for the six (6) months ended June 30, 2000, and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such form 10-QSB for quarterly period ended June 30
2000.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                          <C>


<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  Jun-30-2000
<CASH>                                            182,350
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  200,320
<PP&E>                                            232,817
<DEPRECIATION>                                     27,647
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  2,776,754
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             139,400
<BONDS>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                            1,252
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      2,623,084
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    2,776,754
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    2,217
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     686,671
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    660
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (684,454)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (684,454)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (405,796)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,090,250)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.10)





</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.0

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS


I, Thomas F. Prisby, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, and
Charles V. Cole, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of CFS
Bancorp, Inc. (Company), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

         (1)      The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three
                  months ended March 31, 2005 (Report) fully complies with the
                  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78m(a) or 78o(d), and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Date:    May 10, 2005   By: /s/ Thomas F. Prisby
                            ----------------------------------------------------
                            Thomas F. Prisby
                            Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer


Date:    May 10, 2005   By: /s/ Charles V. Cole
                            ----------------------------------------------------
                            Charles V. Cole
                            Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to CFS Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained
by CFS Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.


                                       36
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EXHIBIT C 

EXPENSE SUMMARY 

JANUARY 29, 2019 THROUGH AUGUST 31, 2019 

Expenses Amount

Accommodations $1,573.29

Bankruptcy CEO pay/Friske $1,000.00

BK Board pay/Friske $2,700.00

BK Examples w/ Liability/DF $3,000.00

BOD 20 cos + stats/MK $7,500.00

Business Meals $316.22

Charge PG&E $200 change fee $200.00

Charge PG&E $200 change fee $200.00

Emergence equity 19 cos/DF $4,750.00

GEIDS Research/MK $2,000.00

Meetings $853.16

Miscellaneous $56.35

Travel $3,665.83

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4584-3 Filed: 11/05/19 Entered: 11/05/19 18:16:15 Page 1

of 1
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11** 

**- 1764** 

FRANKLIN C. REAVES, Reverend, PHD
,

Plaintiff

- Appellant
,

v.

SHERRY R. RHODES, individually and in her official capacity as Clerk of Court for Marion County; MARK W. RICHARDSON, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Marion County; LEVON NICHOLS, a/k/a Levern Nichols, individually and in his official capacity as Deputy Sheriff of Marion County; ALBERT WOODBERRY, individually and in his official capa city as Deputy Sheriff of Marion County; MITCHE MCCASKILL, individually and in his official capacity as Deputy Sheriff of Marion County; CW JOHNSON, individually and in his official capacity as Marion County Jailor; TIM HARPER, individually and in his offi cial capacity as County Administrator; JOHN Q. ATKINSON, individually and in his official capacity as member of Marion County Council; ELOSIE W. ROGERS, individually and in her official capacity as member of Marion County Council; TOM SHAW, individually an d in his official capacity as member of Marion County Council; ALLEN FLOYD, individually and in his official capacity as member of Marion County Council; MILTON TROY, individually and in his official capacity as member of Marion County Council; PEARLY BRIT T, individually and in his official capacity as member of Marion County Council; ELISTA H. SMITH, individually and in her official capacity as member of Marion County Council; AE MOREHEAD, individually and in his official Capacity as Family Court Judge
,

Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence

. Terry L. Wooten , District Judge. ( 4:10

- cv

- 03234

- TLW

- TER )2 Submitted : September 29, 2011 Decided: October 4, 2011

Before KING , GREGORY, and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Franklin C. Reaves, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Thomas King, WILLCOX BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not bindi ng precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:

Franklin C. Reaves seeks to appeal the district

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and dismissing several Defendants from his civil suit.

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28

U.S.C. § 1291 (200 6 ), and certain interlocutory and collateral

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (200 6 ); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.

Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 , 545

- 46 (1949). The

order Reaves seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an

appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the cou rt and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5195 

AN ACT 

To provide additional visas for the Afghan Special Immigrant 

Visa Program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5195 EH

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AFGHAN SPECIAL IMMIGRANT 

2 PROGRAM. 

3 Section 602(b)(3) of the Afghan Allies Protection Act 

4 of 2009 (8 U.S.C. 1101 note) is amended by adding at 

5 the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(E) SPECIAL RULE FOR END OF CAL7 ENDAR YEAR 2014.— 

8 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—During the period 

9 beginning on the date of the enactment of 

10 this subparagraph and ending on Decem11 ber 31, 2014, an additional 1,000 principal 

12 aliens may be provided special immigrant 

13 status under this section. For purposes of 

14 status provided under this subparagraph— 

15 ‘‘(I) the period during which an 

16 alien must have been employed in ac17 cordance with paragraph (2)(A)(ii) 

18 must terminate on or before Decem19 ber 31, 2014; 

20 ‘‘(II) the principal alien seeking 

21 special immigrant status under this 

22 subparagraph shall apply to the Chief 

23 of Mission in accordance with para24 graph (2)(D) not later than December 

25 31, 2014; and 
3 

•HR 5195 EH

1 ‘‘(III) the authority to provide 

2 such status shall terminate on Decem3 ber 31, 2014. 

4 ‘‘(ii) CONSTRUCTION.—Clause (i) 

5 shall not be construed to affect the author6 ity, numerical limitations, or terms for pro7 vision of status, under subparagraph 

8 (D).’’. 

9 SEC. 2. TEMPORARY FEE INCREASE FOR CERTAIN CON10 SULAR SERVICES. 

11 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi12 sion of law, the Secretary of State, not later than January 

13 1, 2015, shall increase the fee or surcharge authorized 

14 under section 140(a) of the Foreign Relations Authoriza15 tion Act, Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995 (Public Law 103– 

16 236; 8 U.S.C. 1351 note) by $1.00 for processing ma17 chine-readable nonimmigrant visas and machine-readable 

18 combined border crossing identification cards and non19 immigrant visas. 

20 (b) DEPOSIT OF AMOUNTS.—Notwithstanding sec21 tion 140(a)(2) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, 

22 Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995 (Public Law 103–236; 8 

23 U.S.C. 1351 note), the additional amount collected pursu24 ant the fee increase authorized under subsection (a) shall 

25 be deposited in the general fund of the Treasury. 
4 

•HR 5195 EH

1 (c) SUNSET PROVISION.—The fee increase authorized 

2 under subsection (a) shall terminate on the date that is 

3 5.5 years after the first date on which such increased fee 

4 is collected. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 30, 2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5195 

AN ACT 

Immigrant Visa Program, and for other purposes. 

To provide additional visas for the Afghan Special
4818-5545-8734.1

EXHIBIT B

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5227-2 Filed: 12/31/19 Entered: 12/31/19 07:28:24 Page 1

of 3
4818-5545-8734.1 Exhibit B

COMPENSATION BY WORK TASK CODE FOR SERVICES RENDERED BY 

COBLENTZ PATCH DUFFY & BASS LLP FOR THE PERIOD NOVEMBER 1, 2019

THROUGH NOVEMBER 30, 2019

TASK1

CODE DESCRIPTION1 HOURS AMOUNT

C100 Fact Gathering 26.60 $7,646.80

L110 Fact Investigation/Development 17.60 $7,040.00

L120 Analysis/Strategy 9.20 $4,280.00

L143 eDiscovery - Identification and Preservation 0.50 $250.00

L200 Pre-Trial Pleadings and Motions 10.80 $5,400.00

L310 Written Discovery 13.40 $6,270.00

L330 Depositions 44.00 $17,655.00

L620 Collection 1.90 $760.00

L630 Processing 0.50 $125.00

L650 Review 11.00 $4,190.00

L654 Second Pass Document Review 0.20 $80.00

L656 Redaction 0.90 $360.00

L670 Production 14.80 $2,590.00

P1002 Project Administration 47.20 $29,692.80

 

1 These Task Codes and Descriptions were used by Coblentz in conjunction with pre-petition 

time entries and invoices as required by Debtors prior to the filing of these Bankruptcy Cases, 

and Coblentz continues to use them in conjunction with post-petition time entries and invoices in 

these Special Counsel matters. In connection with additional services Coblentz now is required 

to perform in connection with these bankruptcy cases (e.g., in connection with Coblentz's 

retention application, monthly fee statements, fee applications, or the like), Coblentz further 

specifies the time and fees for any such additional services in footnote 2 below.

2 This Task Code includes: (a) 5.9 hours ($3,675.70 in fees) related to Coblentz's Eighth and 

Ninth Monthly Fee Statements; (b) 24.8 hours ($15,440.10 in fees) related to Coblentz's First 

Interim Fee Application; and (c) 4.6 hours ($2,865.80 in fees) related to Special Counsel 

requirements and further and supplemental party and rate disclosures in these Bankruptcy Cases 

as required by Federal Rules and/or terms of this Special Counsel retention.

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5227-2 Filed: 12/31/19 Entered: 12/31/19 07:28:24 Page 2

of 3
4818-5545-8734.1 Exhibit B

TASK1

CODE DESCRIPTION1 HOURS AMOUNT

P240 Real and Personal Property 36.80 $12,608.60

P300 Structure/Strategy/Analysis 76.40 $48,725.28

P400 Initial Document Preparation/Filing 52.40 $33,955.20

P500 Negotiation/Revision/Responses 18.00 $11,664.00

P600 Completion/Closing 11.20 $7,257.60

P700 Post-Completion/Post-Closing 0.80 $518.40

Total: 394.20 $201,068.68

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5227-2 Filed: 12/31/19 Entered: 12/31/19 07:28:24 Page 3

of 3
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5604 

To direct the Secretary of the Army to revise the management plan for 

the conservation pool in Lake Texoma, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 

Mr. HALL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Army to revise the management plan for the conservation pool in Lake Texoma, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LAKE TEXOMA MANAGEMENT. 

4 (a) MANAGEMENT PLAN REVISION.—Notwith5 standing any other provision of law, the Secretary shall 

6 revise the management plan for the conservation pool in 

7 Lake Texoma to ensure that— 

8 (1) the water surface elevation is maintained 

9 between 619 and 614 mean sea level; 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5604 IH

1 (2) if the water surface elevation is at or below 

2 614 mean sea level, hydroelectric power generation 

3 is only conducted upon a determination by the Sec4 retary, in consultation with the Lake Texoma Advi5 sory Committee, that there are emergency power 

6 needs, including needs resulting from a natural dis7 aster; and 

8 (3) additional water capacity resulting from the 

9 revision under paragraph (1) may be made available 

10 for allocation and, if allocated, district water sup11 pliers will be prioritized. 

12 (b) TIMING.—The Secretary shall make the revisions 

13 required under subsection (a) not later than 60 days after 

14 the date of enactment of this Act. 

15 (c) SECRETARY DEFINED.—In this section, the term 

16 ‘‘Secretary’’ means the Secretary of the Army (acting 

17 through the Chief of Engineers). 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Union Trust Company of Pittsburg, Appellant, *v.*Cain

(No. 4).

Argued April 26, 1905.

Appeal, No. 234, April T., 1905, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. No. 2, Allegheny Co., April T., 1902, No. 615, on verdict for defendant non obstante veredicto in case of the Union Trust Company of Pittsburg, administrator of Johanna Montgomery, deceased, v. William H. Cain and Mary Eliza Cain, his wife, with notice to J. A. Miller, terre-tenant.

Before Rice, P. J., Beaver, Orlady, Porter, Morrison and Henderson, JJ.

Affirmed.

October 9, 1905:

Opinion by

Beaver, J.,

This case was tried in the court below with Nos. 231, 232 and 233 of April Term, 1905. Trust Co. v. Cain, ante, pp. 189, 197, 199.

Opinions have been this day filed in Nos. 231 and 232 and, for the reasons therein given, the judgment entered in this case is affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 3.3
       ARTICLE I
OFFICES
 Registered Office
 Other Offices
 ARTICLE II
MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
 Place and Time of Meetings
 Notice
  1




---



##### 



Stockholders List
 Quorum
 Vote Required
 Voting Rights
 Nomination of Directors
 2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



ARTICLE III
DIRECTORS
 Number, Election and Term of Office
  Removal
 Vacancies
 Place of Meetings
 Annual Meeting
 4




---



##### 



Other Meetings and Notice
 Quorum
 Committees
 Informal Action
 5




---



##### 



Participation in Meetings
 Compensation of Directors
 ARTICLE IV
OFFICERS
 Number
 Election and Term of Office
 Removal
 6




---



##### 



Vacancies
 Compensation
 Chairman of the Board
 The President
  Vice Presidents
 The Secretary and Assistant Secretaries
 7




---



##### 



The Treasurer and Assistant Treasurer
 Other Officers, Assistant Officers and Agents
 ARTICLE V
INDEMNIFICATION OF OFFICERS, DIRECTORS AND OTHERS
  8




---



##### 



9




---



##### 



ARTICLE VI
CERTIFICATES OF STOCK
 Form
  10




---



##### 



Lost Certificates
 Fixing a Record Date
 Securities Owned by Corporation
 11




---



##### 



Registered Stockholders
 ARTICLE VII
MISCELLANEOUS
 Dividends
 Fiscal Year
 Checks
 Notice and Waiver of Notice
  12




---



##### 



Seal
 ARTICLE VIII
AMENDMENTS
  13




---



##### 



/s/
David YntemaDavid YntemaSecretary 14
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law

of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

FEB 28 1997

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

RONALD EDWARD GILLETTE,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

JOHN SHANKS, Warden; and

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE

STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

Respondents-Appellees.

No. 96-2127

(D.C. No. CIV 94-1422 JC/LFG)

(District of New Mexico)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, PORFILIO, Circuit Judge, and MURPHY, Circuit

Judge.

This is an appeal from the denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28

U.S.C. § 2254. We have examined the record and determined appellant has failed to

make a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right; therefore a certificate of

appealability must be denied. Lennox v. Evans, 87 F.3d 431, 432 (10th Cir, 1996); 28

U.S.C. § 2253 (1996).
- 2 -

In the district court, Mr. Gillette filed two petitions that were joined for

disposition. In the first, he asserted the denial of constitutional rights because he was not

granted sufficient meritorious release credits by the state. In the second petition, he

claimed a denial of due process during a prison disciplinary hearing. After denying relief

on both petitions, the district court also denied a certificate of appealability. 

On appeal, Mr. Gillette asserts the state is failing to comply with the terms of a

“federal consent decree” which pertains to educational opportunities in state prisons. 

This issue was not raised in either of his original petitions or in his amended petition. He

does not raise the claims asserted in the district court.

Because we agree substantially with the disposition of the district court, we

conclude Mr. Gillette has not met his burden. Moreover, if the state has failed to comply

with a consent decree of which he is a beneficiary, his remedy lies in the court that issued

the decree. 

The certificate of appealability is DENIED.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

John C. Porfilio

Circuit Judge