30750 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 105 / Wednesday, June 2, 2010 / Proposed Rules 

Baltimore Transportation Management 

Center shall open on signal for the 

passage of vessels when a request to 

open is given. 

(2) The draw of the bridge shall not 

be operated by the controller at the 

Transportation Management Center 

office in the event of failure or 

obstruction of the video cameras, audio 

system, or phone lines. In these 

situations, a bridge tender must be 

called and be on-site within 30 minutes 

to operate the bridge on-site. 

(3) The draw of the bridge must begin 

opening within 5 minutes of the 

vehicular and pedestrian traffic clearing 

the bridge, except as provided in 33 CFR 

117.31(b). 

(4) When vehicular and pedestrian 

traffic has cleared, a horn will sound 

one prolonged blast followed by one 

short blast to warn of bridge movement. 

The channel traffic lights will flash red 

continually to indicate that the Bridge is 

moving to the full open position for 

vessels. Once the bridge is in the fully 

open position, the bridge channel traffic 

lights will turn and remain green. 

(5) Before the span begins to close, the 

horn will sound five short blasts and an 

audio voice-warning device will 

announce bridge movement. The 

channel traffic lights will then 

continually flash red until the bridge is 

seated and locked down to vessels. 

(6) The owners of the bridge shall 

provide and keep in good legible 

condition two board gauges painted 

white with black figures not less than 

six inches high to indicate the vertical 

clearance under the closed draw at all 

stages of the tide. The gauges shall be 

placed on the bridge so that they are 

plainly visible to the operator of any 

vessel approaching the bridge from 

either upstream or downstream. 

(b) The draw of the I695 Bridge, mile 

1.0 at Baltimore, shall open on signal if 

at least a one-hour notice is given to the 

Maryland Transportation Authority in 

Baltimore. 

Dated: May 14, 2010. 

Wayne E. Justice, 

Rear Admiral, United States Coast Guard, 

Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District. 

[FR Doc. 2010–13119 Filed 6–1–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 117 

[Docket No. USCG–2010–0228] 

RIN 1625–AA09 

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; 

Arkansas Waterway, Little Rock, AR 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to 

revise the operating procedures on the 

Baring Cross Railroad Drawbridge across 

the Arkansas Waterway at mile 119.6 at 

Little Rock, AR, so that vessel operators 

will contact the remote drawbridge 

operator via microphone keying four 

times within five seconds on VHF–FM 

Channel 13 when requesting a draw 

opening. This keying will activate an 

indicator on the remote drawbridge 

operator’s console and send an 

acknowledgement tone back to the 

vessel. The remote drawbridge operator 

would then establish normal verbal 

radio communications. The intent is to 

isolate and differentiate the vessel 

operator radio communications from the 

railroad communications that the 

remote drawbridge operator receives, 

thus ensuring that vessel calls receive 

immediate attention. 

DATES: Comments and related material 

must reach the Coast Guard on or before 

August 2, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by docket number USCG– 

2010–0228 using any one of the 

following four methods: 

(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

(2) Fax: 202–493–2251. 

(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility 

(M–30), U.S. Department of 

Transportation, West Building Ground 

Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590– 

0001. 

(4) Hand Delivery: Same as mail 

address above, between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. The telephone number 

is 202–366–9329. 

To avoid duplication, please use only 

one of these four methods. See the 

‘‘Public Participation and Request for 

Comments’’ portion of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

below for instructions on submitting 

comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this proposed 

rule, call or e-mail Mr. Eric Washburn, 

Bridge Management Specialist, Eighth 

Coast Guard District, Bridge Branch; 

telephone 314–269–2378, e-mail 

Eric.Washburn@uscg.mil. If you have 

questions on viewing or submitting 

material to the docket, call Renee V. 

Wright, Program Manager, Docket 

Operations, telephone 202–366–9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Public Participation and Request for 

Comments 

We encourage you to participate in 

this rulemaking by submitting 

comments and related materials. All 

comments received will be posted, 

without change to http:// 

www.regulations.gov and will include 

any personal information you have 

provided. 

Submitting Comments 

If you submit a comment, please 

include the docket number for this 

rulemaking (USCG–2010–0228), 

indicate the specific section of this 

document to which each comment 

applies, and provide a reason for each 

suggestion or recommendation. You 

may submit your comments and 

material online (http:// 

www.regulations.gov), or by fax, mail or 

hand delivery, but please use only one 

of these means. If you submit a 

comment online via http:// 

www.regulations.gov, it will be 

considered received by the Coast Guard 

when you successfully transmit the 

comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or 

mail your comment, it will be 

considered as having been received by 

the Coast Guard when it is received at 

the Docket Management Facility. We 

recommend that you include your name 

and a mailing address, an e-mail 

address, or a phone number in the body 

of your document so that we can contact 

you if we have questions regarding your 

submission. 

To submit your comment online, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, click on the 

‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will 

then become highlighted in blue. In the 

‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu 

select ‘‘Proposed Rules’’ and insert 

‘‘USCG–2010–0228’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’ 

box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the 

balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column. 

If you submit your comments by mail or 

hand delivery, submit them in an 

unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 

11 inches, suitable for copying and 

electronic filing. If you submit them by 

mail and would like to know that they 

reached the Facility, please enclose a 

stamped, self-addressed postcard or 

envelope. We will consider all 

comments and material received during 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 105 / Wednesday, June 2, 2010 / Proposed Rules 30751 

the comment period and may change 

the rule based on your comments. 

Viewing Comments and Documents 

To view comments, as well as 

documents mentioned in this preamble 

as being available in the docket, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, click on the 

‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then 

become highlighted in blue. In the 

‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2010– 

0228’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the 

‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’ 

column. You may also visit the Docket 

Management Facility in Room W12–140 

on the ground floor of the Department 

of Transportation West Building, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, 

DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. We have an agreement with 

the Department of Transportation to use 

the Docket Management Facility. 

Privacy Act 

Anyone can search the electronic 

form of comments received into any of 

our dockets by the name of the 

individual submitting the comment (or 

signing the comment, if submitted on 

behalf of an association, business, labor 

union, etc.). You may review a Privacy 

Act notice regarding our public dockets 

in the January 17, 2008, issue of the 

Federal Register (73 FR 3316). 

Public Meeting 

We do not now plan to hold a public 

meeting. But you may submit a request 

for one using one of the four methods 

specified under ADDRESSES. Please 

explain why one would be beneficial. If 

we determine that one would aid this 

rulemaking, we will hold one at a time 

and place announced by a later notice 

in the Federal Register. 

Background and Purpose 

The Arkansas Waterway is part of the 

McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River 

Navigation System. This system rises in 

the vicinity of Catoosa, OK and 

embraces improved natural waterways 

and a canal to empty into the Lower 

Mississippi River in southeast Arkansas. 

The Arkansas Waterway drawbridge 

operation regulations contained in 33 

CFR 117.123(b) state that the draw of 

the Baring Cross Railroad Drawbridge, 

mile 119.6, at Little Rock, AR is 

maintained in the closed position and is 

remotely operated. Vessels requesting 

an opening shall establish contact by 

radiotelephone with the remote 

drawbridge operator on VHF–FM 

Channel 13 in Omaha, NE. In order to 

better differentiate between vessel and 

land traffic for the remote drawbridge 

operator, Union Pacific has requested 

that this drawbridge be operated 

similarly to how another Union Pacificowned drawbridge is operated, the Rob 

Roy Drawbridge, mile 67.4 on the 

Arkansas Waterway near Pine Bluff, AR 

where vessels key their microphone four 

times in five seconds in order to initiate 

contact with the remote drawbridge 

operator. The same method would be 

enacted at the Baring Cross Railroad 

Drawbridge. Vessel operators would key 

their microphones four times in five 

seconds and would receive an 

acknowledgement tone from the remote 

drawbridge operator stationed at the 

Union Pacific Harriman Center in 

Omaha, NE. The keying-in initiates an 

indicator on the remote drawbridge 

operator’s console and the remote 

drawbridge operator will then establish 

normal verbal radio communications on 

VHF–FM Channel 13. The Coast Guard 

met with Union Pacific personnel at the 

Harriman Center to discuss the 

proposed changes. In addition, the Coast 

Guard did a test at the Harriman Center 

to witness how communications would 

work and how the console is monitored. 

The Coast Guard has determined that 

this regulatory change would improve 

communications between the remote 

drawbridge operator and vessel 

operators and reduce delays due to 

missed calls by isolating vessel operator 

contacts from railroad contacts at the 

Harriman Center. 

Discussion of Proposed Rule 

The proposed changes to 33 CFR 

117.123(b)(1) and (2) should enhance 

communications while reducing the 

number of missed calls and draw 

opening delays at the Baring Cross 

Railroad Drawbridge. 

Regulatory Analyses 

We developed this proposed rule after 

considering numerous statutes and 

executive orders related to rulemaking. 

Below we summarize our analyses 

based on 13 of these statutes or 

executive orders. 

Regulatory Planning and Review 

This proposed rule is not a 

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under 

section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, 

Regulatory Planning and Review, and 

does not require an assessment of 

potential costs and benefits under 

section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office 

of Management and Budget has not 

reviewed it under that Order. 

We expect the economic impact of 

this proposed rule on commercial traffic 

operating on the Arkansas Waterway to 

be so minimal that a full Regulatory 

Evaluation is unnecessary. The 

operating procedures are already in 

place at a different bridge on the same 

waterway and vessel operators are 

accustomed to the procedures. 

Small Entities 

Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered 

whether this proposed rule would have 

a significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises 

small businesses, not-for-profit 

organizations that are independently 

owned and operated and are not 

dominant in their fields, and 

governmental jurisdictions with 

populations of less than 50,000. 

The Coast Guard certifies under 5 

U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule 

would not have a significant economic 

impact on a substantial number of small 

entities. This proposed rule is neutral to 

all business entities since it only alters 

the initial contact between vessels and 

the drawbridge operator and the Baring 

Cross Railroad Drawbridge is still 

required to open on demand for vessels. 

If you think that your business, 

organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity 

and that this rule would have a 

significant economic impact on it, 

please submit a comment (see 

ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it 

qualifies and how and to what degree 

this rule would economically affect it. 

Assistance for Small Entities 

Under section 213(a) of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), 

we want to assist small entities in 

understanding this proposed rule so that 

they can better evaluate its effects on 

them and participate in the rulemaking. 

If the rule would affect your small 

business, organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction and you have questions 

concerning its provisions or options for 

compliance, please contact Mr. Eric 

Washburn, Bridge Management 

Specialist, Eighth Coast Guard District, 

Bridge Branch, at 314–269–2378. The 

Coast Guard will not retaliate against 

small entities that question or complain 

about this proposed rule or any policy 

or action of the Coast Guard. 

Collection of Information 

This proposed rule would call for no 

new collection of information under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501–3520.). 

Federalism 

A rule has implications for federalism 

under Executive Order 13132, 

Federalism, if it has a substantial direct 

effect on State or local governments and 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
30752 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 105 / Wednesday, June 2, 2010 / Proposed Rules 

would either preempt State law or 

impose a substantial direct cost of 

compliance on them. We have analyzed 

this proposed rule under that Order and 

have determined that it does not have 

implications for federalism. 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,00 (adjusted for inflation) or 

more in any one year. Though this 

proposed rule will not result in such an 

expenditure, we do discuss the effects of 

this rule elsewhere in this preamble. 

Taking of Private Property 

This proposed rule would not effect a 

taking of private property or otherwise 

have taking implications under 

Executive Order 12630, Governmental 

Actions and Interference with 

Constitutionally Protected Property 

Rights. 

Civil Justice Reform 

This proposed rule meets applicable 

standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of 

Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice 

Reform, to minimize litigation, 

eliminate ambiguity, and reduce 

burden. 

Protection of Children 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13045, 

Protection of Children from 

Environmental Health Risks and Safety 

Risks. This rule is not an economically 

significant rule and would not create an 

environmental risk to health or risk to 

safety that might disproportionately 

affect children. 

Indian Tribal Governments 

This proposed rule does not have 

tribal implications under Executive 

Order 13175, Consultation and 

Coordination with Indian Tribal 

Governments, because it would not have 

a substantial direct effect on one or 

more Indian tribes, on the relationship 

between the Federal Government and 

Indian tribes, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes. 

Energy Effects 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13211, Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. We have 

determined that it is not a ‘‘significant 

energy action’’ under that order because 

it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866 and is not 

likely to have a significant adverse effect 

on the supply, distribution, or use of 

energy. The Administrator of the Office 

of Information and Regulatory Affairs 

has not designated it as a significant 

energy action. Therefore, it does not 

require a Statement of Energy Effects 

under Executive Order 13211. 

Technical Standards 

The National Technology Transfer 

and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 

U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use 

voluntary consensus standards in their 

regulatory activities unless the agency 

provides Congress, through the Office of 

Management and Budget, with an 

explanation of why using these 

standards would be inconsistent with 

applicable law or otherwise impractical. 

Voluntary consensus standards are 

technical standards (e.g., specifications 

of materials, performance, design, or 

operation; test methods; sampling 

procedures; and related management 

systems practices) that are developed or 

adopted by voluntary consensus 

standards bodies. 

This proposed rule does not use 

technical standards. Therefore, we did 

not consider the use of voluntary 

consensus standards. 

Environment 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Department of Homeland 

Security Management Directive 023–01, 

and Commandant Instruction 

M16475.lD which guides the Coast 

Guard in complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have made a preliminary determination 

that this action is one of a category of 

actions which do not individually or 

cumulatively have a significant effect on 

the human environment because it 

simply promulgates the operating 

regulations or procedures for 

drawbridges. We seek any comments or 

information that may lead to the 

discovery of a significant environmental 

impact from this proposed rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117 

Bridges. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to 

amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows: 

PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE 

OPERATION REGULATIONS 

1. The authority citation for part 117 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1; 

Department of Homeland Security Delegation 

No. 0170.1. 

2. In § 117.123, revise 

paragraphs(b)(1) and (b)(2) to read as 

follows: 

§ 117.123 Arkansas Waterway. 

* * * * * 

(b) * * * 

(1) Normal Flow Procedures. Any 

vessel which requires an opening of the 

draw of this bridge shall establish 

contact by radiotelephone with the 

remote drawbridge operator on VHF– 

FM Channel 13 in Omaha, NE. To 

establish contact, the vessel shall key 

the radio microphone four times in five 

seconds and listen for an 

acknowledgement tone. The remote 

drawbridge operator will then establish 

normal verbal radio communications on 

VHF–FM Channel 13 and advise the 

vessel whether the requested span can 

be immediately opened and will 

maintain constant contact with the 

vessel until the requested span has 

opened and the vessel passage has been 

completed. The bridge is equipped with 

a Photoelectric Boat Detection System to 

prevent the span from lowering if there 

is an obstruction under the span. If the 

drawbridge cannot be opened 

immediately, the remote drawbridge 

operator will notify the calling vessel 

and provide an estimated time for a 

drawbridge opening. 

(2) High Velocity Flow Procedures. 

The area from mile 118.2 to mile 125.4 

is a regulated navigation area as 

described in § 165.817. During periods 

of high velocity flow, which is defined 

as a flow rate of 70,000 cubic feet per 

second or greater at the Murray Lock 

and Dam, mile 125.4, downbound 

vessels which require that the draw of 

this bridge be opened for unimpeded 

passage shall contact the remote 

drawbridge operator as described above 

in § 117.123(b)(1) either before 

departing Murray Lock and Dam or 

before departing the mooring cells at 

mile 121.5 to ensure that the Baring 

Cross Railroad Drawbridge is opened. 

The remote drawbridge operator shall 

immediately respond to the vessel’s 

contact, ensure that the drawbridge is 

open for passage, and ensure that it 

remains in the open position until the 

downbound vessel has passed through. 

If it cannot be opened immediately for 

unimpeded passage in accordance with 

§ 165.817, the remote drawbridge 

operator will immediately notify the 

downbound vessel and provide an 

estimated time for a drawbridge 

opening. Upbound vessels shall request 

openings in accordance with the normal 

flow procedures as set forth above in 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 105 / Wednesday, June 2, 2010 / Proposed Rules 30753 

§ 117.123(b)(1). The remote drawbridge 

operator shall keep all approaching 

vessels informed of the position of the 

drawbridge span. 

* * * * * 

Dated: May 10, 2010. 

James E. Tunstall, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, 8th 

Coast Guard Dist. Acting. 

[FR Doc. 2010–13121 Filed 6–1–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket No. USCG–2008–0747] 

RIN 1625–AA11 

Regulated Navigation Area; Thea Foss 

and Wheeler-Osgood Waterways EPA 

Superfund Cleanup Site, 

Commencement Bay, Tacoma, WA 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Supplemental notice of 

proposed rulemaking; request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is revising 

its proposed rule that would establish a 

permanent regulated navigation area 

(RNA) on portions of the Thea Foss and 

Wheeler-Osgood Waterways in 

Commencement Bay, Tacoma, 

Washington. The RNA would protect 

the seabed in portions of those 

waterways that are subject to the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency’s 

(EPA’s) Commencement Bay Nearshore/ 

Tideflats superfund cleanup 

remediation efforts. To more effectively 

protect those efforts, the Coast Guard is 

revising the proposed rule by slightly 

expanding the boundaries of the 

proposed RNA. 

DATES: Comments and related material 

must be received by the Coast Guard on 

or before August 2, 2010. Requests for 

public meetings must be received by the 

Coast Guard on or before July 2, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by docket number USCG– 

2008–0747 using any one of the 

following methods: 

(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

(2) Fax: 202–493–2251. 

(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility 

(M–30), U.S. Department of 

Transportation, West Building Ground 

Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590– 

0001. 

(4) Hand Delivery: Same as mail 

address above, between 9 a.m. and 

5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. The telephone number 

is 202–366–9329. 

To avoid duplication, please use only 

one of these four methods. See the 

‘‘Public Participation and Request for 

Comments’’ portion of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

below for instructions on submitting 

comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this proposed 

rule, call ENS Ashley Wanzer, 

Waterways Management, Sector Seattle, 

Coast Guard; telephone 206–217–6175, 

e-mail SectorSeattleWWM@uscg.mil. If 

you have questions on viewing or 

submitting material to the docket, call 

Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, 

Docket Operations, telephone 202–366– 

9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Public Participation and Request for 

Comments 

We encourage you to participate in 

this rulemaking by submitting 

comments and related materials. All 

comments received will be posted 

without change to http:// 

www.regulations.gov and will include 

any personal information you have 

provided. 

Submitting Comments 

If you submit a comment, please 

include the docket number for this 

rulemaking (USCG–2008–0747), 

indicate the specific section of this 

document to which each comment 

applies, and provide a reason for each 

suggestion or recommendation. You 

may submit your comments and 

material online (via http:// 

www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or 

hand delivery, but please use only one 

of these means. If you submit a 

comment online via http:// 

www.regulations.gov, it will be 

considered received by the Coast Guard 

when you successfully transmit the 

comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or 

mail your comment, it will be 

considered as having been received by 

the Coast Guard when it is received at 

the Docket Management Facility. We 

recommend that you include your name 

and a mailing address, an e-mail 

address, or a telephone number in the 

body of your document so that we can 

contact you if we have questions 

regarding your submission. 

To submit your comment online, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, click on the 

‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will 

then become highlighted in blue. In the 

‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu 

select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert 

‘‘USCG–2008–0747’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’ 

box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the 

balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column. 

If you submit your comments by mail or 

hand delivery, submit them in an 

unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 

11 inches, suitable for copying and 

electronic filing. If you submit 

comments by mail and would like to 

know that they reached the Facility, 

please enclose a stamped, self-addressed 

postcard or envelope. We will consider 

all comments and material received 

during the comment period and may 

change the rule based on your 

comments. 

Viewing Comments and Documents 

To view comments, as well as 

documents mentioned in this preamble 

as being available in the docket, go 

tohttp://www.regulations.gov, click on 

the ‘‘read comments’’ box, which will 

then become highlighted in blue. In the 

‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2008– 

0747’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the 

‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’ 

column. You may also visit the Docket 

Management Facility in Room W12–140 

on the ground floor of the Department 

of Transportation West Building, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, 

DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. We have an agreement with 

the Department of Transportation to use 

the Docket Management Facility. 

Privacy Act 

Anyone can search the electronic 

form of comments received into any of 

our dockets by the name of the 

individual submitting the comment (or 

signing the comment, if submitted on 

behalf of an association, business, labor 

union, etc.). You may review a Privacy 

Act notice regarding our public dockets 

in the January 17, 2008, issue of the 

Federal Register (73 FR 3316). 

Public Meeting 

We do not now plan to hold a public 

meeting. But you may submit a request 

for one on or before July 2, 2010 using 

one of the four methods specified under 

ADDRESSES. Please explain why you 

believe a public meeting would be 

beneficial. If we determine that one 

would aid this rulemaking, we will hold 

one at a time and place announced by 

a later notice in the Federal Register. 

Regulatory Information 

The Coast Guard published a notice of 

proposed rulemaking (NPRM) entitled 

‘‘Regulated Navigation Area; Thea Foss 

and Wheeler-Osgood Waterways EPA 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS