alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,921
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,021
<ALLOWANCES>                                       217
<INVENTORY>                                      4,681
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,289
<PP&E>                                           8,461
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,952
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,592
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,902
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,217
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,154
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,592
<SALES>                                         12,738
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,738
<CGS>                                            9,251
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,251
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 292
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (359)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (359)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (359)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.30)


</TABLE>
#### STATE v. DORSEY ALLEN.

(Filed 18 November, 1925.)

Intoxicating Liquors — Spirituous Liquors — Instructions—Appeal and Error — Evidence—Questions íor Jury — Statutes.

Upon tbe trial under an indictment for violating tbe probibition law, there was evidence tbat an illicit still was found without connecting its operation with tbe defendant, but tbat a coat was found thei'e with a receipt with defendant’s name on it in one of tbe pockets: *Beld,*an instruction that tbe name on tbe receipt was sufficient evidence tbat it was tbe property of defendant, and it should be considered to identify tbe coat, is an expression of an opinion upon tbe weight and credibility of tbe evidence inhibited by statute, and reversible error. O. S., 564.

Appeal by defendant from *McElroy, J.,*at August Term, 1925, of Moore.

Criminal prosecution tried upon an indictment charging tbe defendant (1) with tbe unlawful manufacture of spirituous liquors or intoxicating bitters (0. S., 3367), and (2) with having1 or keeping in bis possession, for tbe purpose of sale, certain spirituous; vinous or malt liquors (C. S., 3379), contrary to tbe statutes in such cases made and provided, etc.

From an adverse verdict and sentence of six months on tbe roads, tbe defendant appeals, assigning errors.

*Attorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.*

*W. B. Glegg for defendant.*

Stacy, C. J.

A still was discovered in tbe upper' end of Moore County on 26 November, 1924. Tbe officers found a coat at tbe still site, and in one of tbe pockets was a receipt, made out in tbe name of tbe defendant, Dorsey Allen, for three years subscription to tbe *Southern Planter,*a newspaper published at Richmond, Ya. Tbe defendant was not seen at tbe still, though some one, other than tbe defendant, ran away as tbe officers approached.

*499Tbe court instructed tbe jury as follows:

> “Tbe court charges you, gentlemen, tbat tbe name on tbe receipt is sufficient proof tbat tbe receipt was tbe property of tbe defendant, Dorsey Allen, and tbat its, purpose is to identify tbe coat and it is admitted for tbis purpose, and if you find tbat tbe receipt is sufficient evidence to identify tbe owner of tbe coat, tben you will return a verdict of guilty.”

Tbe Assistant Attorney-General, witb bis usual candor, frankly confesses bis inability to defend tbis instruction. It contains an expression of opinion, in violation of C. S., 564, as to tbe sufficiency and weight of tbe evidence. *S. v. Hart,*186 N. C., 582; *Speed v. Perry,*167 N. C., 122. Tbe error, of course, was unintentional. It is just one of those casualties which, now and tben, befalls tbe most circumspect in tbe trial of causes on tbe circuit. *S. v. Kline, ante,*177.

New trial.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DIEMER & WEI, LLP 

Kathryn S. Diemer (#133977) 

100 West San Fernando Street, Suite 555 

San Jose, CA 95113 

Telephone: 408-971-6270 

Facsimile: 408-971-6271 

Email: kdiemer@diemerwei.com 

WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER LLP 

Matthew A. Feldman (admitted pro hac vice) 

Joseph G. Minias (admitted pro hac vice) 

Erica L. Kerman (admitted pro hac vice) 

787 Seventh Avenue 

New York, NY 10019-6099 

Telephone: (212) 728-8000 

Facsimile: (212) 728-8111 

Email: mfeldman@willkie.com 

 jminias@willkie.com 

 ekerman@willkie.com 

 

Counsel for Ad Hoc Group of Subrogation Claim Holders 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION, 

 

 -andPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, 

 Debtors. 

☐ Affects PG&E Corporation 

☐ Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company 

 Affects both Debtors 

* All papers shall be filed in the lead case, 

No. 19-30088 (DM)

Case No. 19-30088 DM 

Chapter 11 

(Lead Case) 

(Jointly Administered) 

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION 

FOR ADMISSION OF ERICA L. 

KERMAN PRO HAC VICE

Signed and Filed: August 26, 2019

________________________________________

DENNIS MONTALI

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

Entered on Docket 

August 26, 2019

EDWARD J. EMMONS, CLERK 

U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3699 Filed: 08/26/19 Entered: 08/26/19 18:18:05 Page 1 of

2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Erica L. Kerman, whose business address and telephone number is 

WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER LLP 

Erica L. Kerman 

787 Seventh Avenue 

New York, NY 10019-6099 

Telephone: (212) 728-8000 

Facsimile: (212) 728-8111 

Email: ekerman@willkie.com 

Is an active member in good standing of the bar of New York, having applied in the above-entitled 

action for admission to practice in the Northern District of California on a pro hac vice basis, 

representing the Ad Hoc Group of Subrogation Claim Holders. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application is granted, subject to the terms and 

conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate appearance pro hac vice. 

Service of papers upon and communication with co-counsel designated in the application will 

constitute notice to the represented party. All future filings in this action are subject to the 

Bankruptcy Local Rules and Electronic Case Filing Procedures adopted by the United States 

Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California. 

** END OF ORDER ** 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3699 Filed: 08/26/19 Entered: 08/26/19 18:18:05 Page 2 of

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet and Statement of Operations filed as part of the Report on Form 10-Q and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Report on Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,802
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,898
<ALLOWANCES>                                       515
<INVENTORY>                                      3,563
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,817
<PP&E>                                          35,705
<DEPRECIATION>                                (19,757)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,984
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,406
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,393
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,141
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,984
<SALES>                                         72,424
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                72,424
<CGS>                                           57,604
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   57,604
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,245
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,716
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,837
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,879
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,879
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .57
        

</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
RICHARD K. INGLIS, as Special Trustee ) of the Trust Under the Last Will and ) Testament of Rosa B. Schweiker, dated ) February 2, 1961, BRUCE D. ) BERLINGER, as the Individual Trustee ) of the Trust Under the Last Will and ) Testament of Rosa B. Schweiker, dated ) February 2, 1961, and MICHAEL R. ) PRESLEY, as Individual Trustee of the ) Schweiker-Berlinger Irrevocable Life ) Insurance Trust, ) ) Petitioners, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-486 ) ROBERTA SUE CASSELBERRY, f/k/a ) SUE C. BERLINGER, ) ) Respondent. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed June 15, 2018.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Collier County; Elizabeth V. Krier, Judge. Robert M. Presley, and Michael R. Presley, of Presley and Presley, P.A., Wellington, for Petitioner Berlinger, John D. Kehoe, of Cheffy Passidomo, P.A., Naples, for Petitioners Inglis and M. Presley. Robert A. Stok and Joshua R. Kon, of Stok Folk + Kon, Aventura, for Respondent.- 2 -

PER CURIAM.

Denied.

LaROSE, C.J., and BADALAMENTI and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
ex4_4.htm




Exhibit 4.4

 


Incorporator's Certificate

of

WiFi Wireless, Inc.





I, Mark DeSomer, the sole Incorporator of WiFi Wireless, Inc., a(n) Oregon corporation formed in accordance with the laws of that state, sign this statement to set forth action taken as follows:





FIRST: I state that the Certificate of Incorporation of WiFi Wireless, Inc., a true copy of which is annexed to this statement, was filed with the Department of State of Oregon on 6/3/2004.





SECOND: The by-laws annexed to this statement have been adopted by me as the by-laws of WiFi Wireless, Inc.





THIRD: The following persons have been nominated and elected by me as directors of WiFi Wireless, Inc. to hold office until the first annual meeting of shareholders and until their successors are elected and qualify:





Eugene L. Curcio

Matthew T. Walusko

William F. Piper

Kurt Jafay





FOURTH: I hereby assign all my rights, responsibilities, and duties as incorporator of WiFi Wireless, Inc. to the above-named Directors. After execution of this Certificate, the Incorporator named herein shall have no rights, responsibilities, or duties in regards to this corporation.





The foregoing is established by my signature on this instrument at 10140 SW 90th Ave., Tigard, Oregon 97223, on 6/3/2004.







Mark DeSomer, Incorporator
#### ART BRONZE AND IRON WORKS v. J. E. BEAMAN et *al.*

(Filed 8 October, 1930.)

Judgments F d — Motion for judgment non obstante veredicto wiH not be granted when the pleadings support the verdict.

Where the pleadings are sufficient to support the verdict, a motion for judgment *non obstante veredicto*will not be allowed, and where the trial depends upon whether an agreement respecting the defendant’s liability had been made between the parties, and the verdict thereon is rendered in favor of the plaintiff, the defendant’s motion for judgment *non obstante veredicto*on the ground of failure of consideration will not be allowed when the extent of his plea by way of answer is only the denial of the fact of agreement as alleged in the complaint.

Appeal by defendant, Perrin W. Gower, from *Daniels, J.,*at May Term, 1930, of WaKE.

Civil action to recover'for materials furnished by plaintiff and used by J. E. Eeaman, contractor, in the construction of a building for Perrin "W". Gower, owner, and to hold the contractor’s bond liable therefor.

*538Tbe right of the plaintiff to recover is not now questioned, but it is alleged by the Commercial Casualty Insurance Company, surety on the contractor’s bond, that after the completion of the building, the owner agreed to release the surety from further liability under its bond and to save it harmless from claims of laborers and materialmen, if the said surety would approve a final settlement between the owner and the contractor, whereby the 15 per cent retained percentage of the contract price, in the hands of the owner, could be released to the contractor, and the owner given possession of the building. This was denied by the defendant Gower.

The jury returned the following verdict:

“1. Is defendant Beaman indebted to plaintiff as alleged in the complaint, and if so, in what amount? Answer: Yes, $1,711.71, with interest from 19 October, 1928.

“2. Was the letter of release signed by Southgate & Company, given and accepted upon agreement of Gower to pay all claims? Answer: Yes.”

Motion by the defendant Gower for judgment *non obstante veredicto*on the ground that there was no consideration for the alleged. agreement; overruled; exception.

Judgment on the verdict for plaintiff, and judgment over against Perrin W. Gower for Commercial Casualty Insurance Company. The defendant Gower appeals.

*No counsel appearing for plaintiff,*

*Clyde A. Douglass and Manning & Manning for defendant Gower.*

*S. Brown Shepherd for defendant Insurance Company.*

Stacy, C. J.

Appellant’s motion for judgment *non obstante veredicto',*which, in effect, is but a belated motion for judgment on the pleadings, was properly overruled on authority of the decisions in *Jernigan v. Neighbors,*195 N. C., 231, 141 S. E., 586, and *Shives v. Cotton Mills,*151 N. C., 290, 66 S. E., 141. The defendant Gower, in his answer, denies the agreement as alleged by the Commercial Casualty Insurance Company, but this is the extent of his plea.

The record discloses no exceptive assignment of error upon which a reversal of the judgment might properly be based. Hence, it will not be disturbed.

No error.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ZACHARY D. BITNER, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-1399

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed June 22, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk 

County; Neil A. Roddenbery, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and 

Tim Bower Rodriguez, Special Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Michael Schaub,

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, MORRIS, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 10.2


        AMENDMENT NUMBER THREE


        TO THE


        HENRY SCHEIN, INC.


        SECTION 162(m) CASH BONUS PLAN


         


        WHEREAS, Henry Schein, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Henry Schein, Inc. Section 162(m) Cash Bonus Plan, as amended (the “Plan”);


        WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 7.2 of the Plan, the Company has reserved the right to amend the Plan;


        WHEREAS, pursuant to the Company’s Compensation Committee Charter, the Board delegated authority to the Compensation Committee to amend the Plan; and


        WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee desires to amend the Plan to extend the term thereof.


        NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective December 31, 2009, subject to stockholder approval at the 2009 annual stockholders’ meeting, as follows:


        
            	
                        1.

                    	
                        Subject to stockholder approval at the 2009 annual stockholders’ meeting, Section 7.1 of the Plan is hereby amended to add the following new paragraph to the end thereof:

                    


        


        “(c)     The Plan is amended to extend the term to December 31, 2013, effective December 31, 2009, subject to stockholder approval at the 2009 annual stockholders’ meeting. Notwithstanding Sections 7.1(a) and 7.1(b), subject to stockholder approval of the Plan, as amended, at the 2009 annual stockholders’ meeting, a bonus may be payable under this
        Plan in respect to fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2009, provided that no bonus shall be payable under this Plan in respect to any fiscal year beginning after December 31, 2013.”


         


        
            	
                        2.

                    	
                        Except as amended hereby and expressly provided herein, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.

                    


        


         


        
            


             


             


            

        


        
            

        


        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment has been executed April 16, 2009.


        
                                                                                           
        HENRY SCHEIN, INC.


         


        
            	
                        By:

                    	
                        /s/ Michael S. Ettinger

                    
	
                         

                    	
                        Name: Michael S. Ettinger

                    
	
                         

                    	
                        Title: Senior Vice President

                    


        


         


         


        
            


            2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                           1,248
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,320
<ALLOWANCES>                                       183
<INVENTORY>                                      3,424
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,274
<PP&E>                                           7,454
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,461
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,441
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,556
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           748
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,457
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,441
<SALES>                                         16,909
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,909
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,724
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 285
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    480
<INCOME-TAX>                                       102
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                378
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (1,619)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,241)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.65)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        



</TABLE>
City of Ames Promissory Note



 Exhibit 10.4 
 DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE 
  

									
	Amount	  	$50,000	  		  	Date:	  	01/22/2009

 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned jointly and severally promise to pay to the order of Ames Chamber of
Commerce / Community Investment Fund, the sum of Fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00), together with interest of 0% per annum on the unpaid balance. The entire principal and any accrued interest shall
be fully and immediately payable UPON DEMAND of any holder thereof. 
 Upon default in making payment within 30 days of demand, and providing
this note is turned over for collection, the undersigned agree to pay all reasonable legal fees and costs of collection to the extent permitted by law. This note shall take effect as a sealed instrument and be enforced in accordance with the laws of
the State of Iowa. All parties to this note waive presentment, notice of non-payment, protest and notice of protest, and agree to remain fully bound notwithstanding the release of any party, extension or modification of terms, or
discharge of any collateral for this note. 
 NOTICE TO BORROWER: THIS IS A DEMAND NOTE AND SO MAY BE COLLECTED BY THE
LENDER AT ANY TIME. A NEW NOTE MUTUALLY AGREED UPON AND SUBSEQUENTLY ISSUED MAY CARRY A HIGHER OR LOWER RATE OF INTEREST. 
  

	
	 /s/ Thomas A. Morrow

	[Maker’s signature]
	
	 Thomas A. Morrow, Chairman and CEO
 Home School, Inc.



 NOTICE TO CO-SIGNER: YOUR SIGNATURE ON THIS NOTE MEANS THAT YOU ARE EQUALLY LIABLE FOR REPAYMENT OF THIS LOAN.
IF THE BORROWER DOES NOT PAY, THE LENDER HAS A LEGAL RIGHT TO COLLECT FROM YOU. 
  

	
	 /s/ Thomas A. Morrow

	[Co-signer’s signature]
	
	 Thomas A. Morrow, Chairman and CEO
 Home School, Inc.


	
	Witnessed:
	
	 /s/ Daniel A. Culhane

	[Witness’s signature]
	
	 Daniel A. Culhane, President & CEO
 Ames Chamber
of Commerce