alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1          **CERTIFICATION**
I, Robert C. Salipante, certify that: 

1.	I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (U.S.);

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) [Omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238];

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: August 12, 2005
 */s/Robert C. Salipante                       
Robert C. Salipante  
President*
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3911    Filed: 09/17/19    Entered: 09/17/19 13:04:08    Page 1 of2

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3911    Filed: 09/17/19    Entered: 09/17/19 13:04:08    Page 2 of2
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Annual Report On Form 10-KSB of Amber Hill, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ending December 31, 2006, I, Richard Alexander, MD, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2006, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  April 10, 2007 AMBER HILL, INC. By: /s/ Richard Alexander, MD Richard Alexander, MD  {A0038091.DOC}  Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Annual Report On Form 10-KSB of Amber Hill, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ending December 31, 2006, I, Hilary L. Davis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2006, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  April 10, 2007 AMBER HILL, INC. By:  /s/ Hilary L. Davis Hilary L. Davis    {A0038091.DOC}
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**SECTION
      906 CERTIFICATION**




I,
      Michael Brandofino, Chief Executive Officer of Glowpoint, Inc., a
      Delaware corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify, in accordance with
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as created pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:




1)  The accompanying
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the six and three months ended
      June 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended; and




2)  The information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company .




Date:
      June 6, 2007




/s/
                Michael BrandofinoMichael
                Brandofino
              Chief
                Executive Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
      otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
      electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
      provided to Glowpoint, Inc. and will be retained by Glowpoint, Inc. and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request
**EXHIBIT 31.2**CERTIFICATIONI, Brian Hajost, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SteelCloud, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.     Date: March 15, 2006 By: /s/ Brian Hajost       Name: Brian Hajost  Title: President
21
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAY G. KIMPEL,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

ROBERT WALKER, Doctor; P.

JAYASUNDARA, N.P.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 10-56296

D.C. No. 3:08-cv-01734-LABJMA

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 17, 2012** 

Before: LEAVY, PAEZ, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Former California state prisoner Jay G. Kimpel appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate

indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

FILED

APR 18 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-56296

§ 1291. We review de novo. Knievel v. ESPN, 393 F.3d 1068, 1072 (9th Cir.

2005). We reverse and remand.

The district court concluded that Kimpel failed to allege either the

deprivation of a serious medical need or that defendants acted with deliberate

indifference to his needs. However, Kimpel alleged that defendants discontinued

his prescription medication needed to treat serious nerve damage in his arm,

causing him unbearable pain for almost a year; that they found Kimpel’s

consequent suffering to be “funny”; and that they attempted to interfere with

medical treatment Kimpel sought from other doctors. These allegations are

sufficient to state an Eighth Amendment violation. See Farmer v. Brennan, 511

U.S. 825, 837 (1994) (prison official is deliberately indifferent if he knew that

prisoner faced a substantial risk of harm and disregarded that risk); Jett v. Penner,

439 F.3d 1091, 1095, 1097-98 (9th Cir. 2006) (two month delay in receiving

treatment for fractured thumb and nineteen-month delay in being seen by hand

specialist, causing pain and diminished use of hand, is sufficient to state deliberate

indifference claim); see also Knievel, 393 F.3d at 1072 (at the pleading stage,

allegations in plaintiff’s complaint must be taken as true and construed in the light

most favorable to him).
3 10-56296

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with

our disposition. 

Kimpel’s pending requests for action in his case are denied as moot.

Kimpel’s motions for copies of court papers are denied. 

REVERSED and REMANDED.
**Exhibit 10.1**

**DESCRIPTION OF COMPENSATION FORNON-EMPLOYEEDIRECTORS OF NORTHWEST AIRLINES CORPORATION**

As of June 28, 2007, non-employee directors ofNorthwest Airlines Corporation (the “Company”) receive an annual cash retainerof $50,000, an annual fee of $5,000 for service on a committee of the Board,and a fee of $1,500 for each meeting of the Board of Directors attended.  The Chairman of the Board of Directorsreceives an additional annual retainer of $100,000, the Chairman of the AuditCommittee receives an additional annual retainer of $25,000, and the Chairmanof each of the other standing committees of the Board receives an additionalannual retainer of $15,000.  In addition,directors and their spouses and dependent children receive complimentarypositive-space travel privileges on Northwest Airlines and $25,000 per year oftravel on Northwest Airlines and its affiliate airlines that may be extended toother individuals.  Each non-employeedirector is reimbursed for income taxes resulting from use of the complimentarytravel privileges by the director, his or her spouse and dependent children andfor reasonable expenses incurred by the director in connection with his or herservice on the Board.  Board fees arepaid quarterly.

On June 28, 2007, subject to receipt by the Company ofall approvals required for the grant of such awards, each non-employee directorreceived an equity award in the form of 10,975 restricted stock units (“RSUs”)and an option to purchase 7,317 shares of common stock of the Company at aprice per share equal to the closing price of a share of common stock on theNew York Stock Exchange on the date of grant (the “Options”).  The RSUs and Options vest in installmentsover four years and any unvested portion of such awards are forfeitable in theevent the director ceases to be a member of the Board of Directors prior to thefull vesting of such awards other than in connection with a change in controlof the Company.  The Options expire tenyears after the date of grant.  In the eventall approvals required for the grant of such awards are not obtained by theCompany on or before May 31, 2008, the awards will be canceled.  No new equity awards will be granted to thecurrent directors during the next four years.

----
Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14 
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934  I, Zhiguo Fu, Chief Executive Officer of Advanced Battery Technologies, Inc. (the Registrant), certify that: 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 of the Registrant. 2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. 3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in the report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods, presented in the report. 4.   The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5.   The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent function): (a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting. Dated:  May 15, 2007/s/ Zhiguo Fu
Zhiguo Fu
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2




SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION




I, Edwin F. Heinen, Chief Financial Officer of Glowpoint, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1)           The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: August 12, 2009




/s/ Edwin F. Heinen


Edwin F. Heinen


Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to Glowpoint, Inc. and will be retained by Glowpoint, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4192-4    Filed: 10/11/19    Entered: 10/11/19 10:22:19    Page 1of 20

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4192-4    Filed: 10/11/19    Entered: 10/11/19 10:22:19    Page 2of 20

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4192-4    Filed: 10/11/19    Entered: 10/11/19 10:22:19    Page 3of 20

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4192-4    Filed: 10/11/19    Entered: 10/11/19 10:22:19    Page 4of 20

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4192-4    Filed: 10/11/19    Entered: 10/11/19 10:22:19    Page 5of 20

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4192-4    Filed: 10/11/19    Entered: 10/11/19 10:22:19    Page 6of 20

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4192-4    Filed: 10/11/19    Entered: 10/11/19 10:22:19    Page 7of 20

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4192-4    Filed: 10/11/19    Entered: 10/11/19 10:22:19    Page 8of 20

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4192-4    Filed: 10/11/19    Entered: 10/11/19 10:22:19    Page 9of 20

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4192-4    Filed: 10/11/19    Entered: 10/11/19 10:22:19    Page 10of 20

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4192-4    Filed: 10/11/19    Entered: 10/11/19 10:22:19    Page 11of 20

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4192-4    Filed: 10/11/19    Entered: 10/11/19 10:22:19    Page 12of 20

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4192-4    Filed: 10/11/19    Entered: 10/11/19 10:22:19    Page 13of 20

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4192-4    Filed: 10/11/19    Entered: 10/11/19 10:22:19    Page 14of 20

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4192-4    Filed: 10/11/19    Entered: 10/11/19 10:22:19    Page 15of 20

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4192-4    Filed: 10/11/19    Entered: 10/11/19 10:22:19    Page 16of 20

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4192-4    Filed: 10/11/19    Entered: 10/11/19 10:22:19    Page 17of 20

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4192-4    Filed: 10/11/19    Entered: 10/11/19 10:22:19    Page 18of 20

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4192-4    Filed: 10/11/19    Entered: 10/11/19 10:22:19    Page 19of 20

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4192-4    Filed: 10/11/19    Entered: 10/11/19 10:22:19    Page 20of 20
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5385 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5385

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 55 Grasso Plaza in St. Louis, Missouri, as the ``Sgt. Amanda N. 
                         Pinson Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 31, 2014

Mrs. Wagner (for herself, Mr. Clay, Mr. Luetkemeyer, Mrs. Hartzler, Mr. 
 Cleaver, Mr. Graves of Missouri, Mr. Long, and Mr. Smith of Missouri) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                    Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 55 Grasso Plaza in St. Louis, Missouri, as the ``Sgt. Amanda N. 
                         Pinson Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SGT. AMANDA N. PINSON POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 55 Grasso Plaza in St. Louis, Missouri, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Sgt. Amanda N. Pinson Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sgt. 
Amanda N. Pinson Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE v. RUSSELL JOHN CHARLES BARBER.

(Filed 1 November, 1950.)

Criminal Law § 14—

*Certiorari*will not lie from tbe Superior Court to the Recorder’s Court when judgment has been entered in the Recorder’s Court upon defendant’s plea of guilty. G.S. 1-269.

Appeal by defendant from *Bone, J.,*June Term, 1950, of CarteRet.

Appeal dismissed.

*578Theideféndant was charged in'the Becorder’s Court of Carteret County with operating a motor vehicle on a state highway at a greater rate of speed than 55 miles per hour. Defendant appeared 11 April, 1950, without counsel, entered plea of guilty, and was fined $10 and costs, which he-.paid. On 8 May, 1950, defendant’s counsel applied to the resident *Judge*of the District for *writ*of *certiorari.*The resident Judge signed an order-that the papers in the case-be certified to the Superior Court of Carteret County,- which was done. On the hearing in the Superior Court defendant’s counsel moved that the conviction and judgment in the Becorder’s Court be expunged from the record. *Certiorari*was denied as was also the motion to expunge conviction from the record. Defendant excepted and appealed.

*Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorney-General Rhodes for the Stale.*

*Charles L. Abernethy, Jr., for defendant, appellant.*

DeviN, J.

The motion in the Superior Court for writ of *certiorari*was properly denied, G.S. 1-269. *Taylor v. Johnson,*171 N.C. 84, 87 S.E. 981; *Pue v. Hood, Commissioner of Banks,*222 N.C. 310, 22 S.E. 2d 896. There was nothing to invoke the jurisdiction of the Superior Court. The appeal therefrom will stand dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.