alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:

*Time and Date:*                         12 p.m.-3 p.m., June 24, 2010 (Closed).                    

*Place:*                         Teleconference.                    

*Status:*                         The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.                    

*Matters to be Discussed:*                         The meeting will include the initial review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response to “Conducting Public Health Research in Kenya (Panel B),” FOA GH10-003.                    

*Contact Person for More Information:*                         Sheree Marshall Williams, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop D73, Atlanta, GA 30333, Telephone: (404) 639-7742.                    

                        The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                    

Dated: May 25, 2010.

Elaine L. Baker,

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2010-13169 Filed 6-1-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

RICHARD A. MARSHACK, #107291 

rmarshack@marshackhays.com 

DAVID A. WOOD, #272406 

dwood@marshackhays.com 

LAILA MASUD, #311731 

lmasud@marshackhays.com 

MARSHACK HAYS LLP 

870 Roosevelt 

Irvine, California 92620 

Telephone: (949) 333-7777 

Facsimile: (949) 333-7778

Gerald Singleton, SBN 208783 

Gary LoCurto, SBN 270372 

SINGLETON LAW FIRM, APC 

450 A Street, 5th Floor 

San Diego, CA 92101 

Tel: (619) 771-3473 

Email: gerald@slffirm.com 

 glocurto@slffirm.com 

Attorneys for SLF Fire Victim Claimants 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re 

PG&E CORPORATION, 

 and 

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY 

 Debtors 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

) 

) 

Case No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Chapter 11 

(Lead Case–Jointly Administered) 

JOINDER BY THE SINGLETON 

LAW FIRM FIRE VICTIM 

CLAIMANTS IN THE 

1. MEMORANDUM OF POINTS 

AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT 

OF OPPOSITION TO DEBTORS' 

MOTION RE INVERSE 

CONDEMNATION FILED BY 

INDIVIDUAL FIRE VICTIM 

CREDITORS (Docket No. 4768); and 

2. RESPONSE BRIEF OF THE 

OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF TORT 

Affects: 

 PG&E Corporation 

 Pacific Gas & Electric Company 

 Both Debtors 

* All papers shall be filed in the Lead 

Case, 

 No. 19-30088 (DM). 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4805 Filed: 11/18/19 Entered: 11/18/19 19:03:48 Page 1 of

2
2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CLAIMANTS CONCERNING THE 

APPLICABILITY OF INVERSE 

CONDEMNATION (Docket No. 4773) 

Date: November 19, 2019 

Time: 10:00 a.m. (Pacific) 

Place: United States Bankruptcy 

Court: Courtroom 17, 16th Floor 

 San Francisco, CA 94102 

The Singleton Law Firm (SLF), on behalf of fire victim claimants, hereby join 

the Individual Fire Victim Creditors Memorandum of Points and Authorities in 

Support of Opposition to Debtor's Motion re Inverse Condemnation (Docket No. 

4768) filed on November 15, 2019, and the Response Brief of the Official Committee of 

Tort Claimants Concerning the Applicability of Inverse Condemnation (Docket No. 

4773) filed on November 15, 2019. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: November 18, 2019 MARSHACK HAYS LLP 

By: /s Richard A. Marshack

RICHARD A. MARSHACK 

DAVID A. WOOD 

LAILA MASUD 

Attorneys for SLF CLAIMANTS 

Dated: November 18, 2019 SINGLETON LAW FIRM, APC 

By: /s Gerald Singleton

Gerald Singleton 

Gary LoCurto 

Attorneys for the Singleton Law 

Firm Fire Victim Claimants 

 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4805 Filed: 11/18/19 Entered: 11/18/19 19:03:48 Page 2 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4023 Filed: 09/27/19 Entered: 09/27/19 07:12:56 Page 1 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4023 Filed: 09/27/19 Entered: 09/27/19 07:12:56 Page 2 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4023 Filed: 09/27/19 Entered: 09/27/19 07:12:56 Page 3 of

3
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6032** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. CRAIG A. MURPHY , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. ( 3:96

- cr - 00066

- REP

- 17 )

Submitted : May 19, 2014 Decided: May 22, 2014

Before MOTZ , Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Craig A. Murphy, Appellant Pro Se. Heather L. Hart, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Craig Murphy appeals the district cou rt ’ s order denying his motion for resentencing for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Murphy , No. 3:96

- cr - 00066

- REP

- 17 (E. D. Va. Dec. 19, 2013) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
#### Phebe A. Henderson v. Caroline I. Hadden and Others.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion.

All concur.
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 1657-1    Filed: 04/24/19    Entered: 04/24/19 16:15:44    Page 1of 2

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 1657-1    Filed: 04/24/19    Entered: 04/24/19 16:15:44    Page 2of 2
#### William Isaac DAVIS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 8091.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

June 21, 1965.

James L. Applegate, Cheyenne, Wyo., for appellant.

John Quinn, Albuquerque, N. M. (John Babington, Albuquerque, N. M., with him on brief), for appellee.

Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and PICKETT and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The Appellant, Davis, appeals in forma pauperis from an order of the District Court denying a motion to vacate his sentence for the illegal insufficiency of the indictment to charge the offense for which he was sentenced, i. e., the unlawful importation of narcotics under Section 21 U.S.C. § 1741

The plea to the legal insufficiency of the indictment is based squarely on the language of this Court in Robinson v. United States, 10 Cir., 263 F.2d 911: “An indictment charging an offense under 21 U.S.C. § 174 must allege that the accused knew that the contraband was imported or brought into the United States contrary to law.” Knowledge that the contraband was unlawfully imported or brought into the United States is an essential element of the of*379fense charged, and the specific contention is that the indictment in our case failed to so allege in the words of Robinson. It is true that the indictment did not use the literal words of the Robinson case, but it does charge that the petitioner “did knowingly and fraudulently and contrary to law import into the United States a quantity of a derivative and preparation of opium * * * in violation of 21. U.S.C. 174.”

There is no magic to the words used in Robinson to allege guilty knowledge. The wording of this indictment clearly and sufficiently charges guilty knowledge as an essential element of the offense. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

1

. The motion filed and as considered in the trial court also alleged the deprivation of counsel of his own choice. But he has now abandoned this contention and at the bar of the court-appointed counsel stated that he had been specifically directed to confine his appeal to the legal sufficiency of the indictment.
EXHIBIT A

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5110-1 Filed: 12/13/19 Entered: 12/13/19 16:49:23 Page 1

of 2
EXHIBIT A

COMPENSATION BY PROFESSIONAL

FOR THE PERIOD OCTOBER 1, 2019 THROUGH OCTOBER 31, 2019

Billing Total Total

Professional Position Rate Hours Fees

Brent Williams Managing Director $ 1,195 246.9 $ 295,045.50

Alex Stevenson Managing Director 1,195 93.0 111,135.00

Brendan Murphy Managing Director 1,095 291.2 318,864.00

Sherman Guillema Director 895 132.6 118,677.00

Peter Gnatowski Vice President 795 279.6 222,282.00

Matt Merkel Associate 695 300.7 208,986.50

Erik Ellingson Associate 695 115.8 80,481.00

Naeem Muscatwalla Senior Analyst 495 153.0 75,735.00

Riley Jacobs Analyst 395 267.9 105,820.50

Alex Gebert Analyst 395 227.3 89,783.50

Zack Stone Analyst 395 215.8 85,241.00

Grand Total 2,323.8 $ 1,712,051.00

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5110-1 Filed: 12/13/19 Entered: 12/13/19 16:49:23 Page 2

of 2
#### In the Matter of Loretta Hammonds, Respondent, v Vincent Moore, Appellant.

[774 NYS2d 759]

In a support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from so much of an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Spinner, J.), dated April 3, 2003, as, upon directing his incarceration for contempt of court, imposed incarceration costs upon him of $197 per day.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the provision imposing incarceration costs is deleted.

Upon confirming the findings of the hearing examiner that the father was in wilful violation of an order requiring him to pay child support, the Family Court directed his incarceration for 90 days unless he purged the contempt by payment of $1,186, and further ordered the father to pay $197 per day to Suffolk County for the costs of incarceration. The father appeals from so much of the order as imposed incarceration costs.

Family Court Act § 454 does not permit the imposition of incarceration costs. As a court of limited jurisdiction, the Family Court cannot exercise powers beyond those which are granted to it by statute *(see Matter of Pearson v Pearson,*69 NY2d 919*684[1987]; *Matter of DeMarco v Newton,*305 AD2d 501 [2003]). Altman, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Mastro, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

** **

**Section 1350Certification**

** **

In connection with thisannual report of Systematic Momentum II LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Paul Morton, ChiefExecutive Officer, President and Manager of Merrill Lynch AlternativeInvestments LLC, the manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information containedin this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: March 31, 2009                       |             |
|-------------------------------------------------|------------------|
|                                            |             |
| By                                              | /s/  PAUL MORTON |   |
| Paul  Morton                                    |             |
| Chief  Executive Officer, President and Manager |             |
| **(Principal Executive Officer)**               | ** **       |
|                                                 |                  |  |

 

1

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership(the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Ronald Brown, the President and a Director of the Partnership’sGeneral Partner, NewReal, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18.U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the bestof my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.

 
|   | /s/  RONALD  BROWN                                                              |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                                                                      |
|   | Ronald Brown                                                                              |
|   | Principal  Executive Officer                                                              |
|   | (President  and Director of  the Partnership’s General Partner,  NewReal, Inc.) |
|   | August 14,  2003                                                                          |

 

1

----
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Maritime Commission
 Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation Intermediary licenses have been reissued by the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. Chapter 409) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR Part 515. License no.
Name/address
Date reissued013787N
Trans Caribe Express Shippers, Inc., 163 Tremont Avenue, East Orange, NJ 07018
April 29, 2010.015941NF
Cargo Plus, Inc., 8333 Wessex Drive, Pennsauken, NJ 08109
April 25, 2010.021975F
Adora International LLC dba Adora, 16813 FM 1485, Conroe, TX 77306
April 20, 2010.
 Sandra L. Kusumoto, Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.


[FR Doc. 2010-13416 Filed 6-2-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
<PAGE>


Exhibit 11.1


COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                             Three Months Ended           Six Months Ended
                                                  April 30,                   April 30,
                                              2000         2001           2000        2001
                                          -----------------------------------------------------
<S>                                       <C>             <C>           <C>           <C>
Numerator:
Net income (loss) before extraordinary       $240,744     $167,090      $(348,554)   $274,312
  gain
Preferred stock dividends                    (529,411)     (37,500)      (529,411)    (75,000)
                                          -----------------------------------------------------

Net (loss) income available to common
  shareholders before extraordinary gain     (288,667)     129,590       (877,965)    199,312

Denominator:
Denominator for basic earnings per
  share- weighted-average shares            9,574,409   10,109,911      9,497,400  10,006,472
Effect of dilutive securities:
Employee stock options                              -            -              -      35,160
Convertible preferred stock                         -    4,515,537              -           -
Dilutive potential common shares                    -    4,515,537              -      35,160
Denominator for diluted earnings per
  share adjusted weighted-average shares
  and assumed conversions                   9,574,409   14,625,448      9,497,400  10,410,632
Basic and diluted (loss) earnings per
  share                                       $(0.03)        $0.01         $(0.09)      $0.02


</TABLE>
J - A09032 - 18 NON - PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. NICHOLAS L BOWEN Appellant : : : : : : : : : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

No. 1078 WDA 2017 Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence March 3, 2017 In the Court of Common Pleas of Venango County Criminal Division at No(s): CP- 61 - CR - 0000866- 1997 BEFORE: BOWES, J., DUBOW, J., and MURRAY, J. CONCURRING STATEMENT BY BOWES, J.: FILED SEPTEMBER 5, 2018 I join Judge Murray’s well - reasoned memorandum. I write separately to note that, pursuant to Commonwealth v. Batts , 163 A.3d 410 ( Pa. 2017) ,

“ if the Commonwealth seeks to have the sentencing court impose a sentence of life without parole on a juvenile offender, it must provide reasonable notice to the defendant p rior to the sentencing hearing.” Id . at 455. Furthermore, while the trial judge opined that Batts would not have changed its sentence , observations within Batts encourage the use of expert testimony. See Majority Memorandum at 8 n.1. Additionally, Justice Wecht’ s concurring opinion observed: Following today's decision, the Commonwe alth likely will (and I believe should) retai n and present an expert in the vast majority of LWOP resentencing hearings, if not in all of them. That being the case, equity demands that trial courts exercise their discretion to provide such juveniles with their own expert, in the event that the juveni le cannot afford one on his or her own.J - A09032 - 18

- 2 - Id . at 460– 61 (Wecht, J., concurring). Accordingly, I would encourage the trial court to afford Appellant adequate opportunity to respond to any notice filed upon remand .
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Exhibit A 

OCP Declarations and Retention Questionnaires for OCP List Supplement

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4087-1 Filed: 10/03/19 Entered: 10/03/19 13:40:02 Page 1

of 8
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Exhibit A-1 

King & Spalding LLP

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4087-1 Filed: 10/03/19 Entered: 10/03/19 13:40:02 Page 2

of 8
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4087-1 Filed: 10/03/19 Entered: 10/03/19 13:40:02 Page 3

of 8
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4087-1 Filed: 10/03/19 Entered: 10/03/19 13:40:02 Page 4

of 8
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4087-1 Filed: 10/03/19 Entered: 10/03/19 13:40:02 Page 5

of 8
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4087-1 Filed: 10/03/19 Entered: 10/03/19 13:40:02 Page 6

of 8
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4087-1 Filed: 10/03/19 Entered: 10/03/19 13:40:02 Page 7

of 8
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4087-1 Filed: 10/03/19 Entered: 10/03/19 13:40:02 Page 8

of 8
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5415 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5415

To authorize the use of military force against international terrorism.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 8, 2014

Mr. Wolf (for himself, Mr. Gibbs, Mr. Jolly, Mr. Franks of Arizona, and 
  Mr. Kinzinger of Illinois) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the use of military force against international terrorism.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Authorization for Use of Military 
Force against International Terrorism Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF ARMED FORCES.

    (a) In General.--The President is authorized, with the close 
consultation, coordination, and cooperation with NATO and regional 
allies, to use all necessary and appropriate force against those 
countries, organizations, or persons associated with or supporting 
terrorist groups, including al Qaeda and its regional affiliates, the 
Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, al Shabaab, Boko Haram, and any other 
emerging regional terrorist groups that share a common violent 
extremist ideology with such terrorist groups, regional affiliates, or 
emerging terrorist groups, in order to eliminate all such terrorist 
groups and prevent any future acts of international terrorism against 
the United States or its allies by such terrorist groups, countries, 
organizations, or persons.
    (b) War Powers Resolution Requirements.--
            (1) Specific statutory authorization.--Consistent with 
        section 8(a)(1) of the War Powers Resolution, Congress declares 
        that this section is intended to constitute specific statutory 
        authorization within the meaning of section 5(b) of the War 
        Powers Resolution.
            (2) Applicability of other requirements.--Nothing in this 
        Act supercedes any requirement of the War Powers Resolution.
                                 <all>
```