alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5420 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5420

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit the release of 
      information regarding the status of certain investigations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 9, 2014

 Mr. Boustany introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit the release of 
      information regarding the status of certain investigations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RELEASE OF INFORMATION REGARDING THE STATUS OF CERTAIN 
              INVESTIGATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 6103(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(11) Disclosure of information regarding status of 
        investigation of violation of this section.--In the case of a 
        person who provides to the Secretary information indicating a 
        violation of section 7213, 7213A, or 7214 with respect to any 
        return or return information of such person, the Secretary may 
        disclose to such person (or such person's designee)--
                    ``(A) whether an investigation based on the 
                person's provision of such information has been 
                initiated and whether it is open or closed,
                    ``(B) whether any such investigation substantiated 
                such a violation by any individual, and
                    ``(C) whether any action has been taken with 
                respect to such individual (including whether a 
                referral has been made for prosecution of such 
                individual).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall take 
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-19-00544-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.V.T.

From the 293rd Judicial District Court, Maverick County, Texas

Trial Court No. 141130350MCV

Honorable Maribel Flores, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s August 1, 2019 order 

is REVERSED and this cause is REMANDED to the trial court for further proceedings. It is 

ORDERED that Appellant Marc Anthony Torres recover his costs of this appeal from Appellee 

Frances Santos.

SIGNED March 31, 2021.

_____________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
#### STATE v. HERMAN MANNING and JOE MARTIN.

(Filed 28 February, 1945.)

Abortion § 8—

Where, in a criminal prosecution for aiding and abetting in an abortion, G. S., 14-45, the State’s evidence tended to show that defendant, and another who pleaded guilty, took a pregnant woman, in the car of defendant who was driving, to several near-by towns, in the last of which an abortion was performed on the woman, and defendant was heard to say that he might have to pay out of this ease, there is sufficient evidence to sustain a conviction.

Appeal by defendant, Herman Manning, from *Carr, J.,*at September Term, 1944, of MaetiN.

Criminal prosecution tried upon indictment charging the defendants with aiding and abetting in the procurement of an abortion or miscarriage in violation of G. S., 14-45.

It is in evidence that on the night of 5 June, 1944, the defendants, Joe Martin and Herman Manning, took Eeulah Brown, a pregnant woman, in a car driven by Manning, from her home in Martin County to Tarboro. Two days later they took her from her home to Plymouth; and finally, on 10 June, 1944, they took her in Manning’s car from her home to Goldsboro, where an abortion was performed upon her. She died on 12 or 13 June following.

At the close of the evidence, the defendant, Joe Martin, entered a plea of guilty, and sought to exculpate his codefendant from any criminal responsibility in the matter, albeit Manning “said something” to one of the witnesses after the occurrence “about he had (might have) to pay out of this case.” The jury returned a verdict of guilty against the defendant Herman Manning.

Judgment: Two years on the roads as to both defendants.

The defendant. Herman Manning, appeals, assigning as error the refusal to dismiss as in case of nonsuit.

*42
      *Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorneys-General Rhodes and Moody for the State.*

*B. A. Critcher for defendant Herman Manning.*

Per Curiam.

The only question presented by the appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence to carry the case to the jury as against the defendant Herman Manning. We join with the trial court in believing the case to be one for the twelve. *S. v. Martin,*182 N. C., 846, 109 S. E., 74.

No error.
#### Jacob Van Orman, Respondent, v. Maria Van Orman, Appellant.

— Judgment affirmed, with costs.
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5108 

AN ACT 

To establish the Law School Clinic Certification Program 

of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5108 EH

1 SECTION 1. USPTO LAW SCHOOL CLINIC CERTIFICATION 

2 PROGRAM. 

3 (a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Law School Clinic Cer4 tification Program of the United States Patent and Trade5 mark Office, as implemented by the Office, is established 

6 as a program entitled the ‘‘Law School Clinic Certification 

7 Program’’. The Program shall allow students enrolled in 

8 a participating law school’s clinic to practice patent and 

9 trademark law before the Office by drafting, filing, and 

10 prosecuting patent or trademark applications, or both, on 

11 a pro-bono basis for clients that qualify for assistance 

12 from the law school’s clinic. The Director shall establish 

13 regulations and procedures for application to and partici14 pation in the Program. All law schools accredited by the 

15 American Bar Association are eligible for participation in 

16 the Program, and shall be examined for acceptance using 

17 identical criteria established by the Director. The Program 

18 shall be in effect for the 10-year period beginning on the 

19 date of the enactment of this Act. 

20 (b) REPORT ON THE PROGRAM.—The Director shall, 

21 not later than the last day of the 2-year period beginning 

22 on the date of the enactment of this Act, submit to the 

23 Committees on the Judiciary of the House of Representa24 tives and the Senate a report on the Program, describing 

25 the number of law schools and law students participating 

26 in the Program, the work done through the Program, the 
3 

•HR 5108 EH

1 benefits of the Program, and any recommendations of the 

2 Director for modifications to the Program. 

3 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

4 (1) OFFICE.—The term ‘‘Office’’ means the 

5 United States Patent and Trademark Office. 

6 (2) PROGRAM.—The term ‘‘Program’’ means 

7 the Law School Clinic Certification Program estab8 lished in subsection (a). 

9 (3) DIRECTOR.—The term ‘‘Director’’ means 

10 the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual 

11 Property and Director of the United States Patent 

12 and Trademark Office. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 15, 

2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5108 

AN ACT 

To establish the Law School Clinic Certification 

mark Office, and for other purposes. Program of the United States Patent and Trade-
Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Christopher A. Zigmont, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Glowpoint, Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
      information included in this report, fairly present in all material
      respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
      the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and have:

      a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
            disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
            supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
            registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
            to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
            period in which this report is being prepared;

      b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
            and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
            the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
            the end of the period covered by this report based on such
            evaluation; and

      c)    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
            control over financial reporting that occurred during the
            registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
            affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
            registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
      our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
      to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board
      of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
            reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
            record, process, summarize and report financial data; and

      b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
            other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
            internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 15, 2004


/s/ Christopher A. Zigmont
--------------------------
Christopher A. Zigmont
Chief Financial Officer


                                       21
#### TOWN OF WADESBORO v. FRED J. COXE and Wife, ELIZABETH D. COXE, and JAMES A. HARDISON and Wife, LILLIAN H. HARDISON.

(Filed 29 November, 1939.)

Appeal and Error § 2—

No appeal lies from tbe refusal of a motion to dismiss.

Appeal by defendants from *Sink, J.,*at September Term, 1939, of ANSON.

*Robinson, Pruette & Caudle for plaintiff, appellee.*

*B, M. Covington for defendants, appellants.*

Pee Cueiam.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to dismiss tbe action. The appeal must be dismissed, since no appeal lies from a refusal to dismiss an action. *Johnson v. Ins. Co.,*215 N. C., 120, and cases there cited.

Appeal dismissed.
|   | i. | The      Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended      December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange      Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | ii. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | April 19, 2010                                                                              |   | By: | /s/ MARK NOFFKE |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----|-----------------|
|   | Name:  Mark      NoffkeTitle:    Chief      Financial Officer |

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION,

- and -

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, 

Debtors.

Bankruptcy Case

No. 19-30088 (DM)

Chapter 11

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

CERTIFICATE OF PUBLICATION

I, Jesse Offenhartz, do declare and state as follows:

1. I am employed at Prime Clerk LLC, the claims and noticing agent for the debtors in 

the above-referenced chapter 11 bankruptcy cases.

2. This Certificate of Publication includes sworn statements verifying that the Notice of 

Commencement approved by the Bankruptcy Court [Docket No. 226; Exhibit 1], as conformed for 

publication, was published in the following publications and on the following dates: 

Publication Name Date(s) of Publication Exhibit Evidencing Publication

San Francisco Chronicle February 13, 2019 Exhibit A

Wall Street Journal National Edition February 13, 2019 Exhibit B

USA Today National Edition February 14, 2019 Exhibit C

Los Angeles Times February 14, 2019 Exhibit D

The Press Democrat (Santa Rosa) February 14, 2019 Exhibit E

The Bakersfield Californian February 14, 2019 Exhibit F

The Chico Enterprise-Record and

The Oroville Mercury-Register February 14, 2019 Exhibit G

The Sacramento Bee February 14, 2019 Exhibit H

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 522 Filed: 02/20/19 Entered: 02/20/19 18:38:39 Page 1 of 2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 522 Filed: 02/20/19 Entered: 02/20/19 18:38:39 Page 2 of 2
#### The National Bank of Port Jervis v. Jesse C. Hansee, Appellant, and John Hansee, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements.
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4306    Filed: 10/18/19    Entered: 10/18/19 15:54:51    Page 1 of4

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4306    Filed: 10/18/19    Entered: 10/18/19 15:54:51    Page 2 of4

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4306    Filed: 10/18/19    Entered: 10/18/19 15:54:51    Page 3 of4

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4306    Filed: 10/18/19    Entered: 10/18/19 15:54:51    Page 4 of4
---

CONSENT OF TERENCE P. MCNULTY

The undersigned hereby consents to: (i) the filing of the
written disclosure regarding the technical report entitled Juniper Ridge
Uranium Project, Carbon County, Wyoming, USA dated January 27, 2014, in
relation to (a) the Form 40-F Annual Report for the period ended December 31,
2013, and any amendments thereto (the Form 40-F), of Energy Fuels Inc. (the
Company), filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and
(b) the Companys Annual Information Form for the period ended December 31, 2013
(the AIF); and (ii) the incorporation by reference of such disclosure into (a)
the Companys Form S-8 Registration Statement, being filed with the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission and any amendments thereto (the
S-8), and (b) the Companys Form F-10 Registration Statement, being filed with
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and any amendments thereto
(the F-10).

I also consent to: (i) the use of my name in the AIF, the F-10,
and the Form 40-F; (ii) the incorporation by reference of the Form 40-F and the
AIF into the S-8; and (iii) the incorporation by reference of the Form 40-F, and
the AIF into the F-10.

|                     | /s/ Terence P. McNulty         
|-------------------- | -------------------------------
|                     | Terence P. McNulty, P.E., D.Sc.
|                     |                                
|                     |                                
|Date: March 28, 2014 |                                

---
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

EXHIBIT E 

EXPENSE DETAIL FOR THE PERIOD 

JULY 1, 2019 THROUGH JULY 31, 2019 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4817-5 Filed: 11/19/19 Entered: 11/19/19 17:44:20 Page 1

of 3
Category Date Description Amount

Airfare

 Giamanco, Patrick 07/02/2019 Roundtrip coach airfare from Atlanta, GA to San 

Francisco, CA. $624.77

 Donahue, Nona 07/08/2019 Roundtrip coach airfare from Spokane, WA to Salt 

Lake City, UT. $404.47

 Donahue, Nona 07/12/2019 Airline change fee. $200.00

 Nkinzingabo, Rudy 07/21/2019 Roundtrip coach airfare from Phoenix, AZ to San 

Francisco, CA. $318.84

Subtotal for Airfare: $1,548.08

Hotel

 Giamanco, Patrick 07/09/2019 1 night hotel accommodation at Hyatt Regency in 

San Francisco, CA. $406.71

 Giamanco, Patrick 07/10/2019 1 night hotel accommodation at Hyatt Regency in 

San Francisco, CA. $406.71

 Nkinzingabo, Rudy 07/16/2019 1 night hotel accommodation at Park Central in 

San Francisco, CA. $348.17

 Cochran, James 07/17/2019 1 night hotel accommodation at Hyatt Regency in 

San Francisco, CA. $383.46

 Giamanco, Patrick 07/17/2019 1 night hotel accommodation at Le Meridien in 

San Francisco, CA. $338.99

 Nkinzingabo, Rudy 07/17/2019 1 night hotel accommodation at Westin in San 

Francisco, CA. $377.43

 Nkinzingabo, Rudy 07/18/2019 1 night hotel accommodation at Westin in San 

Francisco, CA. $377.43

Subtotal for Hotel: $2,638.90

Total $4,186.98

1

PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company

Expenses Sorted by Category for the Fee Period

Deloitte & Touche LLP

July 01, 2019 - July 31, 2019

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4817-5 Filed: 11/19/19 Entered: 11/19/19 17:44:20 Page 2

of 3
Recapitulation

Category Amount

Hotel $2,638.90

Airfare $1,548.08

2

PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company

Expenses Sorted by Category for the Fee Period

Deloitte & Touche LLP

July 01, 2019 - July 31, 2019

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4817-5 Filed: 11/19/19 Entered: 11/19/19 17:44:20 Page 3

of 3
**Exhibit31.2**

**Certificationof the Principal Accounting OfficerPursuant toRules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Exchange Act**

I, Gemma Lahera,certify that:

1.      I havereviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of HyperFeed Technologies, Inc.;

2.      Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.      Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.      Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)    designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

(b)    evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)    disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.      Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)    allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)    any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 8, 2006
|        |   | /s/ Gemma Lahera             |
|--------|--------|------------------------------|
|   |   | Gemma Lahera                 |
|   |   | Principal Accounting Officer |

 

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 17, 2019

No. 04-19-00239-CV

Debora Alisa DARDEN,

Appellant

v.

Darrell Keith DARDEN,

Appellee

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CI17644

Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed on July 18, 2019. Because the brief was 

not filed by the deadline, on July 24, 2019, this court ordered appellant to show cause why the 

appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a). On August 8, 

2019, appellant responded stating appellant’s attorney was on military duty until August 2, 2019. 

Appellant further requested an extension of time to file the brief to August 19, 2019. Appellant’s 

motion was granted extending the deadline to August 19, 2019.

Because the brief was not filed by the extended deadline, on August 27, 2019, this court 

again ordered appellant to show cause in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed for 

want of prosecution. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a). Appellant’s response to this court’s order was due 

on September 11, 2019. On September 17, 2019, appellant attorney filed a response which 

included a motion for leave to file a late response and a second motion for extension of time.

The motion for leave to file late response and motion for extension of time are 

GRANTED. THIS IS THE FINAL EXTENSION OF TIME THE APPELLANT WILL BE 

GRANTED. The Appellant’s brief must be filed by September 23, 2019.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of September, 2019.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle,

Clerk of Court