alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5407 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5407

 To direct the Attorney General to conduct a study on the cost of the 
  purchase and use of body cameras by State and local law enforcement 
 agencies, and to require law enforcement agencies to purchase and use 
body cameras as a condition on the receipt of Federal funding, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 8, 2014

Mr. Al Green of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Attorney General to conduct a study on the cost of the 
  purchase and use of body cameras by State and local law enforcement 
 agencies, and to require law enforcement agencies to purchase and use 
body cameras as a condition on the receipt of Federal funding, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Transparency in Policing Act of 
2014'' or the ``TIP Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. STUDY ON THE COST OF THE PURCHASE AND USE OF BODY CAMERAS BY 
              LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES.

    (a) Study.--The Attorney General shall conduct a study on the cost 
to State and local law enforcement agencies of purchasing and using 
body cameras.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Attorney General shall submit to Congress a report 
that contains the results of the study conducted under subsection (a).

SEC. 3. REQUIREMENT FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES TO PURCHASE AND USE 
              BODY CAMERAS.

    (a) In General.--Beginning on the date that is 90 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, a State or local law enforcement 
agency that receives Federal funds from a grant program carried out by 
the Department of Justice shall, as a condition of receipt of such 
funds, purchase body cameras for use by the law enforcement officers 
employed by that law enforcement agency.
    (b) Rulemaking Authority.--The Attorney General shall make rules to 
implement the requirement under subsection (a).
    (c) Waiver.--The Attorney General may waive the requirement under 
subsection (a) for a law enforcement agency if the Attorney General 
determines that compliance with such requirement would create a 
hardship for the law enforcement agency.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Thomas H. Lynch v. James J. Martin and Others.

Writ dismissed, with costs. No opinion.
#### D. C. RICHARDSON, Plaintiff, v. NELLIE RICHARDSON COOKE, Defendant.

(Filed 21 October, 1953.)

Appeal by defendant from *Stevens, J.,*at June Term, 1953, of Carteret.

From papers filed in this Court by defendant, as appellant, it would seem that this is a special proceeding instituted for tbe purpose of selling land for partition; that there is in tbe Clerk’s office a fund, tbe proceeds *450of tbe sale of tbe land, for distribution; that at June Term, 1952, Judge Burney entered an order for distribution Of tbe fund, from wbicb order defendant attempted to appeal, but did not perfect tbe appeal; that at March Term, 1953, Judge Stevens entered an order purporting to grant defendant a continuance until June. Term, 1953, to employ counsel and perfect her appeal, wbicb be could not do under rules of practice; and that at June Term, 1953, Judge Stevens, after finding as facts that defendant bad failed to produce bond as per tbe order of Judge Burney, or to employ counsel, or to file a case on appeal as ordered at March Term, 1953, entered an order dismissing tbe appeal of defendant, and ordering tbat tbe funds in custody of tbe Clerk be immediately distributed in accordance witb tbe order of Judge Burney. By wbat authority this order was made does not appear. But it is from this order of Judge Stevens tbat this appeal is attempted.

However, tbe rules of tbe Supreme Court, governing appeals, have not been complied with: (1) Tbe record proper, consisting of summons, pleadings, judgment, and orders, other than tbe Stevens order of June, 1953, are not contained in tbe papers filed in this Court as required by Rule 19 of Rules of Supreme Court — 221 N.C. 553; (2) No appeal bond has been filed, as required by statute G.S. 1-270, G.S. 1-285, nor, in lieu thereof, provision for pauper appeal has been filed as permitted by statute G.S. 1-288; (3) No proper case on appeal has been settled and filed as required by G.S. 1-282 and G.S. 1-283; (4) Tbe record has not been printed, or, in lieu thereof, typewritten copies furnished as required and permitted by Rule 22 of Rules of Supreme Court, 221 N.C. 559; and (5) Brief of defendant, as appellant, has not been printed, or, in lieu thereof, typewritten copies furnished, as required and permitted by tbe rules 27 and 28 of Rules of Supremo Court, 221 N.C. 562.

*For defendant, appellant, in propria personam.*

*For plaintiff, appellee, no counsel.*

Per Curiam.

In spite of, and disregarding an utter failure to present a record or case on appeal in compliance witb tbe rules of tbe Court, and practice prescribed by statute in such eases, wbicb merits a dismissal of tbe appeal, this Court has carefully reviewed tbe papers filed, and listened patiently to personal appeal of defendant, in her appearance before tbe Court, tbat she have an actual partition of tbe “Richardson Family Homeplace,” tbe subject of tbe proceeding. And if there were merit in her desire for an actual partition, tbe record fails to show tbat defendant has preserved her right to present tbe question to this Court.

Therefore let tbe appeal be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

June 20, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132439 Michael F. Cavanagh 

& (23) Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, MICHAEL T. DOE, and PATSY R. Justices 

DOE, Husband and Wife, 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

v SC: 132439 

 COA: 271311 

Washtenaw CC: 02-000141-NH 

JOHN HENKE, M.D., and ANN ARBOR 

ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY,

 Defendants-Appellants, 

and 

TRINITY HEALTH, d/b/a ST. JOSEPH

MERCY HEALTH SYSTEM, d/b/a 

ST. JOSEPH MERCY HOSPITAL,

 Defendant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 17, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for 

consideration as on leave granted in light of Miller v Chapman Contracting, Inc, 477 

Mich 102 (2007). The motion to reverse and remand is DENIED. 

We do not retain jurisdiction. 

l0613 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 20, 2007 

 Clerk
#### William O. Hart, Appellant, v. Augustus Bernau, Respondent.

— Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements. Opinion

*Per Curiam.*
EXHIBIT
32.2
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of SteelCloud, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kevin Murphy, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods
presented therein.
  Date:
      March 17, 2009
                By:
                /s/ Kevin
  MurphyName:
      Kevin MurphyTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2906 Filed: 07/09/19 Entered: 07/09/19 13:08:35 Page 1 of

1
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4753 Filed: 11/14/19 Entered: 11/14/19 18:06:13 Page 1 of

8
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4753 Filed: 11/14/19 Entered: 11/14/19 18:06:13 Page 2 of

8
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4753 Filed: 11/14/19 Entered: 11/14/19 18:06:13 Page 3 of

8
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4753 Filed: 11/14/19 Entered: 11/14/19 18:06:13 Page 4 of

8
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4753 Filed: 11/14/19 Entered: 11/14/19 18:06:13 Page 5 of

8
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4753 Filed: 11/14/19 Entered: 11/14/19 18:06:13 Page 6 of

8
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4753 Filed: 11/14/19 Entered: 11/14/19 18:06:13 Page 7 of

8
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4753 Filed: 11/14/19 Entered: 11/14/19 18:06:13 Page 8 of

8
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Regulatory Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

Wednesday, June 9, 2010 at 11:30 a.m.

# PLACE:

Commission's main conference room, 901 New York Avenue, NW., Suite 200, Washington, DC 20268-0001.

# STATUS:

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# 

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Personnel: consideration of candidates for one or more officer-level positions (closed).

2. Personnel: discussion of staff-level vacancies (closed).

3. Contracts: discussion of confidential commercial information relative to Commission contracts (closed).

# CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:

                        Brian Corcoran, Postal Regulatory Commission, at 202-789-6828 or                         *brian.corcoran@prc.gov.*

*Dated:*                         June 2, 2010.                    

Shoshana M. Grove,

*Secretary*.                    

[FR Doc. 2010-13553 Filed 6-2-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7710-FW-S
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuantto18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Inconnection with the quarterly report of Northwest Airlines Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Douglas M. Steenland, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: November 9, 2006                |
|---------------------------------------|
|                                  |
| /s/ Douglas M. Steenland              |   |
| Douglas M. Steenland                  |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

This certification accompaniesthis Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by suchAct, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).  Such certification will not be deemed to beincorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, asamended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Companyspecifically incorporates it by reference.

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EXHIBIT B 

COMPENSATION BY WORK TASK CODE FOR 

SERVICES RENDERED BY CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP 

FOR THE PERIOD AUGUST 1, 2019 THROUGH AUGUST 31, 2019 

TASK 

CODE DESCRIPTION HOURS AMOUNT 

ADMN Case Administration (Incl. Docket Updates and Case Calendar) 231.70 $74,044.00 

ASST Use and Sale of Assets, Including 363 Sales 2.10 2,052.00 

AUTO Automatic Stay 4.70 4,582.50 

BARN Bar Date and Claims Noticing Matter 10.70 3,345.00 

CASE General Case Strategy 381.00 358,260.00 

CASH Financing / Cash Collateral 551.50 525,166.50 

COMM Committee Matters 780.70 564,578.00 

CRAV Cravath Retention and Fee Application 355.70 246,505.00 

CRED Creditor Inquiries 0.00 0.00 

DSSV Disclosure Statement / Solicitation / Voting Matters 8.40 7,024.50 

ECUL Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases 0.00 0.00 

FEEO Retention and Fee Application of Non-Cravath Professionals 0.40 509.50 

GOVR Corporate Governance and Securities Matters 303.20 304,821.50 

HEAR Hearings and Court Matters 389.70 350,040.50 

INVS Investigations 380.00 287,397.50 

NONB Non-Bankruptcy Litigation 3,511.10 2,059,397.50 

OCMS Other Contested Matters 3.60 3,202.50 

OPRS Business Operations Matters 142.40 117,644.50 

PLAN Plan of Reorganization / Plan Confirmation 79.40 86,302.50

PUBL Public Relations Strategy 59.00 58,006.00 

REGS Regulatory & Legislative Matters 1,696.90 1,029,574.00 

TRVL Non-Working Travel Time 405.50 $183,138.25* 

USTM U.S. Trustee Matters / Meetings / Communications / Reports 16.70 9,003.00 

WILD Wildfire Claims Matters 5,418.10 3,430,650.00 

TOTAL 14,732.50 $9,705,244.75** 

* - Non-Working Travel Time billed at 50% discount. 

** - Net of $97,219.00 in voluntary write offs. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4764-2 Filed: 11/15/19 Entered: 11/15/19 14:15:36 Page 1

of 1
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Harry T. Gale, Appellant, v. Edgar B. Jewett *617and Others, Constituting the Board of Police of the City of Buffalo, Respondents.

Order affirmed, without costs.
H. R. 4926 

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen 

An Act 

To designate a segment of Interstate Route 35 in the State of Minnesota as the 

‘‘James L. Oberstar Memorial Highway’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

The segment of Interstate Route 35 between milepost 133 at 

Forest Lake, Minnesota, and milepost 259 at Duluth, Minnesota, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘James L. Oberstar Memorial 

Highway’’. 

SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, 

or other record of the United States to the segment of Interstate 

Route 35 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘James L. Oberstar Memorial Highway’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit 23.1 Consent of Jewett Schwartz Wolfe
& Associates












December
18, 2008








To Whom
It May Concern:








The firm
of Jewett, Schwartz, Wolfe & Associates consents to the inclusion of our
report of December 12, 2007 on the audited financial statements of Card
Activation Technologies, Inc. as of September 30, 2007 in any filings that are
necessary now or in the near future with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission.








Very
Truly Yours,








/s/
Lawrence Wolfe


Lawrence
Wolfe, CPA, CVA


Hollywood,
Florida








200 South
Park Road, Suite 150  •  Hollywood,
Florida 33021 •  Main
954.922.5885  •  Fax
954.922.5957  •  www.jsw-cpa.com


Member -
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants • Florida Institute of
Certified Public Accountants


Private
Companies Practice Section of the AICPA • Registered with the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board of SEC
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18
(Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

The
undersigned, who are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I, Inc. (the "Company"), each hereby certify as follows:

The
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company (the "Report"), which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated
this 25th day of March, 2011.

/s/ ROBERT S. AISNER Robert S. Aisner Chief Executive Officer/s/ HOWARD S. GARFIELD Howard S. Garfield Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
---

CONSENT OF DOUGLAS L. BEAHM

The undersigned hereby consents to: (i) the filing of the
written disclosure regarding (a) the technical report entitled Sheep Mountain
Uranium Project, Fremont County, Wyoming, USA, Updated Preliminary Feasibility
Study, National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report dated April 13, 2012, (b)
the technical report entitled Juniper Ridge Uranium Project, Carbon County,
Wyoming, USA; 43-101 Mineral Resource Technical Report dated February 21, 2012
and (c) the technical report entitled Juniper Ridge Uranium Project, Carbon
County, Wyoming, USA dated January 27, 2014, in relation to, as applicable, (A)
the Form 40-F Annual Report for the period ended December 31, 2013, and any
amendments thereto (the Form 40-F), of Energy Fuels Inc. (the Company),
filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, (B) the
Companys Annual Information Form for the period ended December 31, 2013 (the
AIF) and (C) the Management Information Circular of the Company dated July 15,
2013, and the documents incorporated by reference therein (the Circular); and
(ii) the incorporation by reference of such disclosure into (a) the Companys
Form S-8 Registration Statement, being filed with the United States Securities
and Exchange Commission and any amendments thereto (the S-8), and (b) the
Companys Form F-10 Registration Statement, being filed with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission, and any amendments thereto (the F-10).

I also consent to: (i) the use of my name in the AIF, the
Circular, the F-10, and the Form 40-F; (ii) the incorporation by reference of
the Form 40-F and the AIF into the S-8; and (iii) the incorporation by reference
of the Form 40-F, the AIF and the Circular into the F-10.

|                     | /s/ Douglas L. Beahm        
|-------------------- | ----------------------------
|                     | Douglas L. Beahm, P.E., P.G.
|                     |                             
|                     |                             
|Date: March 28, 2014 |                             

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5

<CAPTION>
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                             42,000
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                      12,000
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   54,000
<PP&E>                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    607,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           5,284,000
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                     3,872,000
<COMMON>                       21,486,000
<OTHER-SE>                    (30,035,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      607,000
<SALES>                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        0
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  728,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 41,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (836,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (769,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                    (67,000)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                     (836,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                       (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (0.03)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32(ii)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Monroe Bancorp (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gordon M. Dyott, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.



/s/ Gordon M. Dyott
-------------------

Gordon M. Dyott
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
August 13, 2003


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed for any other purpose.