alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE v. JOE C. HINES and STATE v. DORA McPHAUL.

(Filed 19 May, 1954.)

Appeal by defendants from *Clifton L. Moore, J.,*and a jury, at January-February Criminal Term, 1954, of RobesoN.

Criminal prosecutions commenced by two warrants issued out of the Robeson County Recorder’s Court, St. Paul’s District, charging each defendant with possession of nontax-paid whiskey for the purpose of sale. Prom convictions and judgments in the Recorder’s Court, the defendants appealed to the Superior Court, where, after consolidation of the cases for the purpose of trial, they were tried *de no.vo*upon the warrants.

*338Tbe jury returned a verdict of guilty as charged as to each defendant, and from the judgments pronounced, both of them appealed to this Court.

*Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorney-General Love for the State.*

*F. D. Hachett and Robert Weinstein for defendants, appellants.*

Per Curiam.

This case involves no new question requiring extended discussion. A careful examination of the record leaves us with the impression it is free of prejudicial error. See *S. v. Rainey,*236 N.C. 738, 741, 74 S.E. 2d 39, 41; *S. v. Honeycutt,*237 N.C. 595, 599, 75 S.E. 2d 525, 527. The verdict and judgments will be upheld.

No error.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of MEMSIC, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Patricia Niu, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 31, 2010



/S/ PATRICIA NIUPatricia NiuChief Financial Officer
#### HENRY C. BOURNE v. FRED EDWARDS, Administrator of DOUGLASS EDWARDS, Deceased.

(Filed 23 September, 1953.)

Appeal and Error § 6c (2) —

An exception to the signing and entering of the judgment presents only the face of the record for review, and when the judgment is supported by the record the appeal must fail.

Appeal by defendant from *Parker, J.,*and a jury, at April Term, 1953, of Edgecombe.

Civil action to recover on claim rejected by the defendant administrator under G.S. 28-112.

An issue of debt was submitted to and answered by the jury as follows : “In what amount, if any, is defendant indebted to plaintiff ?

“Answer: $636.80, plus 6% interest after June 18, 1952.”

From judgment on the verdict, the defendant appealed.

*Herbert H. Taylor, Jr., for plaintiff, appellee.*

*Floyd T. Hall and P. H. Bell for defendant, appellant.*

*262Per Curiam.

Tbe only exception appearing in tbe record is to tbe signing and entering of tbe judgment from wbicb tbe appeal is taken. Tbis presents only tbe face of tbe record for inspection and review, and when tbe judgment is supported by tbe record tbe appeal must fail. *Query v. Insurance Co.,*218 N.C. 386, 11 S.E. 2d 139; *Smith v. Smith,*226 N.C. 506, 39 S.E. 2d 391. Here tbe verdict supports tbe judgment and no error appears on tbe face of tbe record.

No error.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3900-1 Filed: 09/16/19 Entered: 09/16/19 17:16:00 Page 1

of 1
#### In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Laura L. Van Alstyne and Thomas B. Van Alstyne, as Executors, etc., of Thomas J. Van Alstyne, Deceased.

Motion denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5468 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5468

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 18, 2014

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1103 USPS Building 1103 in Camp Pendleton, California, as the ``Camp 
                Pendleton Medal of Honor Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CAMP PENDLETON MEDAL OF HONOR POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1103 USPS Building 1103 in Camp Pendleton, California, shall 
be known and designated as the ``Camp Pendleton Medal of Honor Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Camp 
Pendleton Medal of Honor Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 17, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1 1

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

David A. Rosenzweig

NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLP

1301 Avenue of the Americas

New York, NY 10019-6022

Tel: (212) 318-3035

Email: david.rosenzweig@nortonrosefulbright.com

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In re

PG&E Corporation

- and -

Pacific Gas and Electric Company

Debtor(s).

Case No. 19-30088 (DM)

Chapter 11

APPLICATION FOR

ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY

PRO HAC VICE

Pursuant to B.L.R. 1001-2(a) and Civil L.R. 11-3, David A. Rosenzweig, an active

member in good standing of the bar of the State of New York and of the United States

Bankruptcy Court and United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, among

other courts, hereby applies for admission to practice in the Northern District of California on a

pro hac vice basis representing Adventist Health System/West, a California religious non-profit

corporation, Feather River Hospital, a California religious non-profit corporation, and Paradise

Retirement Residence LLP d/b/a Feather Canyon.

In support of this application, I certify on oath that:

1. I am an active member in good standing of a United States Court or of the highest

court of another State or the District of Columbia, as indicated above;

2. I agree to abide by the Standards of Professional Conduct set forth in Local Rule

1 1-4, and agree to become familiar with the Local Rules and the Bankruptcy

Dispute Resolution Program of this Court; and

98907561.1

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5350 Filed: 01/13/20 Entered: 01/13/20 09:39:45 Page 1 of

2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1 1

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3. An attorney who is a member of the bar of this Court in good standing and who

maintains an office within the State of California has been designated as cocounsel in the above-entitled action. The name, address and telephone number of

that attorney is:

Rebecca J. Winthrop

Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP

555 South Flower Street, 41st Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90071

(213) 892-9200

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Dated: January 9,2020 /s/DavidA. Rosenzweig

David A. Rosenzweig

98907561.1

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5350 Filed: 01/13/20 Entered: 01/13/20 09:39:45 Page 2 of

2
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
VISION ACQUISITION III, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Antti William Uusiheimala, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Antti William
    UusiheimalaAntti
      William UusiheimalaDecember
      29, 2009
Exhibit
32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report
of Tiger Oil and Energy, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the year ending December
31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Kenneth B Liebscher, CEO of the Company,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|Date: January 18, 2012  | 
|----------------------- | 
|/s/ Kenneth B Liebscher | 
|Kenneth B Liebscher CEO
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,018
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,112,665
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,802,264
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           176
<OTHER-SE>                                  (2,302,088)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,112,665
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,292,611
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (5,452)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                (2,277,159)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,277,159)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.13)



</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Application of the Second National Bank of Cooperstown, pursuant to the request of the Comptroller of the State of New York for the transfer of funds or moneys held in trust by the treasurer of Otsego county.

— Application granted; order to be certified and countersigned by the presiding justice. Papers filed with clerk of Broome county to be certified by him and transmitted, to and filed with the clerk of Otsego county.
EXHIBIT 32


    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Raven Moon Entertainment, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Joey DiFrancesco, President, Chief Executive Officer and principal financial
officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Registrant.


Dated: May 17, 2004


                                            /s/
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Joey DiFrancesco, President,
                                                 Chief Executive Officer and
                                                 principal financial officer
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5517 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5517

 To redesignate the Martin Luther King, Junior, National Historic Site 
            in the State of Georgia, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 17, 2014

  Mr. Lewis introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To redesignate the Martin Luther King, Junior, National Historic Site 
            in the State of Georgia, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Martin Luther King, Jr. National 
Historical Park Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK.

    The Act entitled ``An Act to establish the Martin Luther King, 
Junior, National Historic Site in the State of Georgia, and for other 
purposes.'' (Public Law 96-428) is amended--
            (1) in section 1, by striking ``the map entitled `Martin 
        Luther King, Junior, National Historic Site', numbered 489/
        80,013B, and dated September 1992'' and inserting ``the map 
        entitled `Martin Luther King, Jr. National Historical Park', 
        numbered 489/80,032 and dated April 2009'';
            (2) by striking ``Martin Luther King, Junior, National 
        Historic Site'' each place it appears and inserting ``Martin 
        Luther King, Jr. National Historical Park'';
            (3) by striking ``national historic site'' each place it 
        appears and inserting ``national historical park''; and
            (4) by striking ``historic site'' each place it appears and 
        inserting ``historical park''.

SEC. 3. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law (other than in this Act), map, regulation, 
document, paper, or other record of the United States to the ``Martin 
Luther King, Junior, National Historic Site'' shall be deemed to be a 
reference to the ``Martin Luther King, Jr. National Historical Park''.
                                 <all>
```
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 364 Filed: 02/07/19 Entered: 02/07/19 13:47:44 Page 1 of 2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 364 Filed: 02/07/19 Entered: 02/07/19 13:47:44 Page 2 of 2
#### ANNIE L. NEWBOLD and W. A. NEWBOLD v. MEADOWS FERTILIZER COMPANY.

(Filed 8 October, 1930.)

Damages O a — Plaintiff may not recover where damage is remote, uncertain and speculative.

The plaintiff may not recover damages for breach by the defendant of a contract to ship fertilizer when the plaintiff’s losses to crops are contingent, speculative, or merely possible, and are not such as in the ordinary course of things are reasonably proximate and certain.

Appeal by plaintiffs from *Grady, J.,*at April Term, 1930, of Onslow.

Affirmed.

*N. E. Bay and Dawson '& J ones for plaintiffs.*

*John D. Warliclc and L. I. Moore for defendant.*

Pee Cukiam.

Tbe plaintiffs claim *to have given*tbe defendant an order for fertilizer wbicb was never filled, and for tbe defendant’s alleged breach of a contract to ship fertilizer they seek to recover damages. At tbe close of tbe evidence tbe trial judge intimated an opinion that only nominal damages, if any, could be recovered. Tbe plaintiffs submitted to a nonsuit and appealed. This ruling is sustained by authorities to tbe effect that damages are not allowed for losses wbicb are contingent, speculative, or merely possible and are not such as in tbe ordinary course of things are reasonably proximate and certain. Tbe evidence fails to establish a standard by wbicb tbe alleged loss may be determined with sufficient certainty.

We have considered all tbe assignments of error and find no satisfactory reason for sustaining them. Judgment

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          28,346
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,824,819
<ALLOWANCES>                                   460,827
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,987,503
<PP&E>                                      11,949,797
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,630,589
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,682,386
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,674,364
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,197
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,171,639)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,682,386
<SALES>                                     10,736,305
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,736,305
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,575,928
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               209,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,419,563
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,247,230)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,247,230)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.34)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

AMENDMENT OF RULE S 21 8 ( f )( 1 ), (f) (3)

, and ( g )( 1 ) O F THE

PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF

DISCIPLINARY ENFORCEMENT :

:

:

:

:

:

: NO. 194

DISCIPLINARY RULES

DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 3 1 st day of March , 20 20 , upon the recommendation of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania ; which followed the proposal to

amend Pa.R. D

. E

. 218(f)(1), (f)(3), and (g)(1) having been published for comment in the Pennsylvania Bulletin, 49 Pa.B. 7166 ( December 7 , 2019) :

IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constit ution of Pennsylvania that Rules 218(f)(1), (f)(3), and (g)(1) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement are amended in the attached form.

This ORDER shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and shall be effective in 30 days

.

Material to be added i s bold ed and underlined.

Material to be deleted is bold ed and in brackets.
Exhibit 31.1

Certifications

I, Edward H. Orzetti, Chief Executive Officer and President of Keystone Automotive Operations, Inc.,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Keystone Automotive Operations, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of
the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                   |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 16, 2006
|                   | 
|By:                |  | /s/ EDWARD H. ORZETTI                
|                   |  | Edward H. Orzetti                    
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer and President