alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 15 (Monday, January 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 3953]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-1327]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Delegation of Authority 330]


Re-Delegation to Daniel Sreebny of the Functions and Authorities 
of the Coordinator, Bureau of International Information Programs

    By virtue of the authority vested in me as the Under Secretary of 
State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs by law, including by 
Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and the Foreign 
Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.), 
and to the extent authorized by law, I hereby delegate to Daniel 
Sreebny the functions and authorities of the Coordinator, Bureau of 
International Information Programs.
    The Secretary of State, the Deputy Secretary of State, the Deputy 
Secretary of State for Management and Resources, and the Under 
Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs may at any 
time exercise the functions and authorities delegated herein. The 
functions and authorities delegated herein may not be further delegated 
without my approval.
    This delegation shall take effect upon the designation and 
appointment by the Secretary of State of Daniel Sreebny to serve as 
Acting Coordinator. It shall expire upon the selection and entry upon 
duty of an individual to serve as the Coordinator, Bureau of 
International Information Programs, or the appointment and entry upon 
duty of an individual to serve as the Assistant Secretary for 
International Information Programs, whichever shall occur first.
    This delegation of authority shall be published in the Federal 
Register.

     Dated: January 12, 2010.
Judith A. McHale,
Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2010-1327 Filed 1-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-11-P
EXHIBIT 31.1 Certification of 
Principal Executive Officer CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Jerry W. Neel, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of J-Kan, Inc., an Arkansas corporation (the "Company"), certify that: 1.     I have reviewed this
annual report on Form 10-K of the Company; 2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.     The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter (the Companys fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5.     The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting. Date: October 17, 2008  /s/ JERRY W. NEEL, JR. Jerry W. Neel, Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                        5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUN-30-2000
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                           103,148
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    323,695
<ALLOWANCES>                                       8,697
<INVENTORY>                                       34,954
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 633,891
<PP&E>                                           364,439
<DEPRECIATION>                                   203,194
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,510,293
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            716,859
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           3,350
<OTHER-SE>                                       506,265
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,510,293
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 721,924
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    568,317
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 3,367
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  196,285
<INCOME-TAX>                                      63,204
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              133,081
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     133,081
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        .44



</TABLE>
exhibit10c.htm








Exhibit 10(c)










	
Appendix A2

Last Revised On: May 21, 2009

	
Name
	
Company
	
Pre-4/1/1997 Participant
	
Class A “Bonus SERP” Status
	
Double Basic Credits
	
Double Transition Credits

	
BENNETT, CHRISTOPHER A. *
	
FPL Group, Inc
	
 
	
X1
	
X1
	  
	
KELLIHER, JOSEPH T. *
	
FPL Group, Inc
	
 
	
X1
	
X1
	  
	
MCGRATH, ROBERT L. 2*
	
FPL Group, Inc
	
 
	
X1
	
X1
	
X1

	
POPPELL, JAMES W. *
	
FPL Group, Inc
	  	
X1
	
X1
	  
	
RODRIGUEZ, ANTONIO *
	
FPL Group, Inc
	
X
	
 
	
 
	  
	
SIEVING, CHARLES E. *
	
FPL Group, Inc
	  	
X1
	
X1
	  
	
CUTLER, PAUL I. *
	
FPL Group, Inc
	
 
	
X1
	
 
	  
	
DAVIS, K. MICHAEL *
	
FPL Group, Inc
	
X
	
 
	
 
	  
	  	  	  	  	  	  
	
1
	
The Compensation Committee has expressly identified these items and acknowledged that they are subject to Internal Revenue Code Section 409A.  In particular, these items include: (i) the additional deferred compensation provided by the designation of certain officers as Class A Executives, effective on or after January 1,
2006; and (ii) the additional deferred compensation set forth in SERP Amendment #4 to the Prior Plan (meaning amounts deferred by certain senior officers specified by the Compensation Committee who became participants in the SERP on or after April 1, 1997 at the rate of two times the basic credit and, to the extent applicable, the transition credit under the cash balance formula in the SERP for their pensionable earnings on or after January 1, 2006).  Importantly, nothing in Amendment #4 to the Prior
Plan, the SERP, Compensation Committee resolutions, or any other document shall be construed as subjecting to Code Section 409A any deferrals made under the SERP prior to January 1, 2005, except as expressly noted herein.

	
2
	
Due to material modification of the SERP benefit pursuant to Executive Retention Employment Agreements entered into after December 31, 2004, no amount of the SERP benefit for Mr. McGrath is eligible for grandfathered treatment under Code Section 409A.

	
*
	
Executive Officer of FPL Group, Inc.
#### BRUCE McKEEL v. DR. JOS. R. LATHAM.

(Filed 28 September, 1932.)

Appeal and Error J b — Order rendered in exercise of discretion is not re viewable.

A motion for leave to amend a complaint under C. S., 515 is addressed to tbe sound discretion of tbe trial court, and Ms order denying tbe motion is not subject to review on appeal in tbe absence of gross abuse of tbis discretion.

Appeal, by plaintiff from *Crammer, J.,*at April Term, 1932, of CeaveN.

Dismissed.

At September Term, 1931, of the Superior Court of Craven County, there was a judgment in tbis action, overruling defendant’s demurrer to the complaint. Defendant appealed from said judgment to the Supreme Court. At the bearing of tbis appeal, the judgment was reversed. 202 N. C., 318. It was held that the demurrer should have been sustained.

At April Term, 1932, of the Superior Court of Craven County, the action was again beard on plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend bis complaint. C. S., 515. Tbe motion was denied by the judge, in the exercise of bis discretion. From judgment denying bis motion, and dismissing the action in accordance with the decision of the Supreme Court, the plaintiff appealed to the Supreme Court.

*Ernest M. Green and, B. L. Ward for plaintiff.*

*TP. P. Whitehurst and R. E. Whitehurst for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

The order of the judge of the Superior Court denying plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend bis complaint, was made in the exercise of bis discretion (C. S., 515) and is therefore not subject to review by this Court, on plaintiff’s appeal. There is no contention on the part of the appellant that there was an abuse of the discretion vested in the judge by the statute; at least, there is nothing in the record to sustain this contention.

It is well settled that no appeal lies to tbis Court from an order or judgment made or rendered by a judge of tbe Superior Court in tbe exercise of discretion vested in him by statute. Tbis appeal is therefore

Dismissed.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

EXHIBIT B 

COMPENSATION BY CATEGORY FOR SERVICES RENDERED 

BY DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP FOR THE PERIOD 

AUGUST 1, 2019 THROUGH AUGUST 31, 2019 

Categories Hours Fees 

2018 NDT Audit Services 106.5 $23,005.00 

2019 Audit Services 1,545.9 $325,718.00 

Accounting Consultations 16.0 $9,520.00 

California Wildfires 359.6 $235,086.00 

New Accounting Standards 5.2 $2,222.00 

Post Bankruptcy Matters 49.3 $26,253.00 

Preparation of Fee Applications 75.5 $16,855.00 

Fees Category Subtotal : 2,158.0 $638,659.00 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5081-2 Filed: 12/12/19 Entered: 12/12/19 10:00:47 Page 1

of 1
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Of

Chief Executive Officer And

Chief Financial Officer

Of NATCO
Group Inc.

Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, John U. Clarke, Chief Executive Officer of NATCO Group Inc. (the
Company), and, I, Bradley P. Farnsworth, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |  |  |                              |  |                                              
|---------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ---------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------
|                       |  |  | 
|Date: November 8, 2007 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    JOHN U. CLARKE       
|                       |  |  |  |  |  |                              |  | John U. Clarke Chief Executive Officer       
|                       |  |  | 
|Date: November 8, 2007 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    BRADLEY P.
FARNSWORTH
|                       |  |  |  |  |  |                              |  | Bradley P. Farnsworth Chief Financial Officer
#### COUNTY OF CARTERET v. SIMMONS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION et al.

(Filed 24 September, 1930.)

Pleadings F a — Motion for bill of particulars is addressed to sound discretion of trial court.

A motion for a bill of particulars is addressed to tbe inherent general power of the trial court to regulate the conduct of trials, and when fairly exercised is not appealable.

Appeal by defendants from *Nunn, J.,*at March Term, 1930, of Cartebet.

Civil action for damages.

Motion by defendants for bill of particulars; allowed in part and denied in part.

Defendants appeal, assigning errors.

*F. H. Gorham, Guión •& Guión and McLendon & Hedrick for plaintiff.*

*Moore & Dunn and J. F. Duncan for Simmons Construction Gorporar tion and Floyd M. Simmons.*

*J. F. Duncan, G. R. Wheatly and Luther Hamilton for G. W. Huntley and George Brooks.*

*O. R. Wheatly and Ward & Ward for G. K. Howe and W. L. Standi, defendants.*

Per Curiam.

The record discloses no action on the part of the trial court of which the defendants can justly complain.

*486The pertinent rule is stated in 49 C. J., 625, as follows :

> “It is a matter for the sound discretion of tbe court whether under the circumstances of the case a demand for a bill of particulars should be granted or refused. This power of the court exists by virtue of its general power to regulate the conduct of trials, and it is incident to its general authority in the administration of justice. It is the same power in kind that courts have to grant a new trial on the ground of surprise.”

Our own decisions are to the same effect: *Power Co. v. Elizabeth City, 188*N. C., 278, 124 S. E., 611; *Townsend v. Williams,*117 N. C., 330, 23 S. E., 461.

Affirmed.
#### Michael Fitzgerald, Administrator etc., v. The Long Island Railroad Company.

Judgment *592reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.;

Pratt, J., not sitting.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4878 Filed: 11/26/19 Entered: 11/26/19 20:05:38 Page 1 of

21
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4878 Filed: 11/26/19 Entered: 11/26/19 20:05:38 Page 2 of

21
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4878 Filed: 11/26/19 Entered: 11/26/19 20:05:38 Page 3 of

21
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4878 Filed: 11/26/19 Entered: 11/26/19 20:05:38 Page 4 of

21
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4878 Filed: 11/26/19 Entered: 11/26/19 20:05:38 Page 5 of

21
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4878 Filed: 11/26/19 Entered: 11/26/19 20:05:38 Page 6 of

21
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4878 Filed: 11/26/19 Entered: 11/26/19 20:05:38 Page 7 of

21
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4878 Filed: 11/26/19 Entered: 11/26/19 20:05:38 Page 8 of

21
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4878 Filed: 11/26/19 Entered: 11/26/19 20:05:38 Page 9 of

21
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4878 Filed: 11/26/19 Entered: 11/26/19 20:05:38 Page 10

of 21
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4878 Filed: 11/26/19 Entered: 11/26/19 20:05:38 Page 11

of 21
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4878 Filed: 11/26/19 Entered: 11/26/19 20:05:38 Page 12

of 21
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4878 Filed: 11/26/19 Entered: 11/26/19 20:05:38 Page 13

of 21
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4878 Filed: 11/26/19 Entered: 11/26/19 20:05:38 Page 14

of 21
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4878 Filed: 11/26/19 Entered: 11/26/19 20:05:38 Page 15

of 21
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4878 Filed: 11/26/19 Entered: 11/26/19 20:05:38 Page 16

of 21
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4878 Filed: 11/26/19 Entered: 11/26/19 20:05:38 Page 17

of 21
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4878 Filed: 11/26/19 Entered: 11/26/19 20:05:38 Page 18

of 21
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4878 Filed: 11/26/19 Entered: 11/26/19 20:05:38 Page 19

of 21
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4878 Filed: 11/26/19 Entered: 11/26/19 20:05:38 Page 20

of 21
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4878 Filed: 11/26/19 Entered: 11/26/19 20:05:38 Page 21

of 21
---



CONSENT OF NEIL PRENN

The undersigned hereby consents to:

(i) the filing of the written disclosure regarding the
technical report entitled Technical Report on the Copper King Project, Laramie
County, Wyoming dated August 24, 2012 (the Technical Disclosure) in the
Annual Information Form for the period ended December 31, 2014 (the AIF) of
Energy Fuels Inc. (the Company) being filed as an exhibit to the Companys
Form 40-F Annual Report for the period ended December 31, 2014, and any
amendments thereto (the 40-F), being filed with the United States Securities
and Exchange Commission (the SEC);

(ii) the incorporation by reference of such Technical
Disclosure in the 40-F and the AIF into the Companys Form S-8 Registration
Statement (File No. 333-194900), filed with the SEC, and any amendments thereto
(the S-8);

(iii) the incorporation by reference of such Technical
Disclosure in the AIF into the Companys Form F-10 Registration Statement (File
No. 333-194916), filed with the SEC, and any amendments thereto (the F-10);
and

(iv) the use of my name in the AIF, the F-10, the 40-F and the
S-8.

| | /s/
      Neil Prenn                      
| | ------------------------------------------
| | Neil Prenn, Registered Professional Mining
| | Engineer                                  

Date: March 19, 2015





---
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2145 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 11:11:27 Page 1 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2145 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 11:11:27 Page 2 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2145 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 11:11:27 Page 3 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2145 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 11:11:27 Page 4 of

4
GrafTech International 2005 Equity Incentive Plan - Amendment 2



 EXHIBIT 10.1 
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 
 TO 
 GRAFTECH INTERNATIONAL LTD. 2005 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 
 WHEREAS, the GrafTech International Ltd. 2005
Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) was adopted, effective May 25, 2005; and 
 WHEREAS, GrafTech International Ltd. wishes to
amend the Plan to increase the number of shares of Common Stock that may be delivered under the 2005 Plan by 4,000,000 shares; 
 NOW,
THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective upon the approval of this Amendment No. 2 by the stockholders of GrafTech International Ltd., as follows: 
 Section 3.1 of the Plan is amended to read: 
 “3.1 Number of Shares. Subject to Sections 3.2 and 3.3, the aggregate number
of Shares that may be delivered under this Plan is 8,800,000 Shares. The Shares delivered under this Plan may consist of authorized but unissued Shares or issued Shares that have been reacquired by the Company.” 
  

			
	 Approved on behalf of
 GRAFTECH INTERNATIONAL
LTD.
 and its Subsidiaries

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Craig S. Shular

	Name:	 	Craig S. Shular
	Title:	 	CEO, President, and Chairman of the Board
	Date:	 	May 19, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1999
<CASH>                                         917,367
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               920,473
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,401,808
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          176,123
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           170
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,086,149
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,401,808
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,898,381
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,747
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  1,860,634
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.13)



</TABLE>