alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 8.1
 SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
 
    
    State Good Group Limited, incorporated in the British Virgin Islands
    
    Master Luck Corporation, incorporated in Hong Kong, S.A.R.
    
    ChinaVax, incorporated in the Cayman Islands
    
    Pearl Ocean Holding Limited, incorporated in Samoa
    
    Kanda Biotech Holdings Limited, incorporated in the British Virgin Islands
    
    Simcere Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China
    
    Nanjing Simcere Dongyuan Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China
    
    Jiangsu Simcere Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China
    
    Shanghai Simcere Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China
    
    Jiangsu Simcere Pharmaceutical R&D Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China
    
    Sichuan Zigong Yirong Industrial Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China
    
    Hainan Qitian Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China
    
    Shandong Simcere Medgenn Bio-Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China
    
    Medgenn (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd., incorporated in Hong Kong, S.A.R.
    
    Jilin Boda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China
    
    Nanjing Tung Chit Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China
    
    Wuhu Simcere Zhong Ren Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China
    
    Jiangsu Quanyi Biological Technology Stock Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China
    
    Jiangsu Yanshen Biological Venture Capital Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China
    
    Nanjing Xiangao Investments Management Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China
    
    Jiangsu Simcere Vaxtec Bio-Pharmaceutical R&D Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China
    
    Shanghai Celgen Bio-Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China
    
    Simcere of America Inc., incorporated in the State of Delaware
exv10w09







EXHIBIT 10.09




JOINT FILING AGREEMENT



Each of the undersigned hereby agrees and consents that the Schedule 13D/A filed herewith (the
“Schedule 13D/A”) by Steven M. Lutz is filed on behalf of each of them pursuant to the
authorization of the undersigned to make such filing and that such Schedule 13D/A is filed jointly
on behalf of each of them, pursuant to Sections 13(d) and 13(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and the rules promulgated thereunder, including Rule 13d-1(k)(1). Each of the
undersigned hereby agrees that such Schedule 13D/A is, and any further amendments to the Schedule
13D/A will be, filed on behalf of each of the undersigned. Each of the persons is not responsible
for the completeness or accuracy of the information concerning the other persons making this filing
unless such person knows or has reason to believe that such information is inaccurate. This
agreement may be signed in counterparts. This agreement is effective as of August 4, 2009.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	LUTZ FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

 	 
	Dated: August 4, 2009 	/s/ Steven M. Lutz
 	 
	 	Name:  	Steven M. Lutz 	 
	 	Title:  	General Partner 	 
	 	 	 
	 	                           /s/ Steven M. Lutz
 	 
	 	Steven M. Lutz
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<MULTIPLIER>                   1,000


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           150,310
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    263,518
<ALLOWANCES>                                       8,472
<INVENTORY>                                       31,696
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 520,114
<PP&E>                                           357,800
<DEPRECIATION>                                   187,781
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,593,922
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            562,252
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           3,350
<OTHER-SE>                                       689,846
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,593,922
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 645,894
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    528,429
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 2,534
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  126,752
<INCOME-TAX>                                      36,785
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               89,967
<DISCONTINUED>                                    24,311
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     114,278
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        .35




</TABLE>
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 4(b)
                                          
                             SIXTH JOINT AMENDMENT TO 
                          AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE INSURANCE; 
                      DISBURSEMENT REQUEST AND AUTHORIZATION; 
                               PROMISSORY NOTE; AND 
                            LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT


This Sixth Joint Amendment to Agreement to Provide Insurance; Disbursement
Request and Authorization; Promissory Note; and Loan and Security Agreement is
entered into this 5th day of May, 1998, by and between PC Quote, Inc., a
Delaware corporation ("PC Quote") and PICO Holdings, Inc., a California
corporation ("PICO").

WHEREAS, PC Quote and PICO are parties to that certain Agreement to Provide
Insurance; Disbursement Request and Authorization; Promissory Note; and Loan and
Security Agreement, as amended August 8, 1997, September 22, 1997, December 30,
1997, February 5, 1998, and March 10, 1998 (collectively, the "Definitive
Agreements").

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is
hereby acknowledged, PC Quote and PICO hereby agree to amend the Definitive
Agreements as follows:

I.        PROMISSORY NOTE DATED MAY 5, 1997, AMENDED AUGUST 8, 1997, SEPTEMBER
          22, 1997, DECEMBER 30, 1997, FEBRUARY 5, 1998, AND MARCH 10, 1998.

          The Amended Promissory Note is hereby again amended as follows:

          A.   In the second paragraph, on the third line delete "April 30,
          1998" and insert "May 31, 1998."

II.       Except as expressly provided herein, all of the terms and provisions
          of the Definitive Agreements shall remain in full force and effect.

III.      This Sixth Joint Amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts,
          each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which together
          shall constitute one and the same instrument.

     
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Sixth Joint Amendment as of
the date first written above.



PC QUOTE, INC.


By:  ______________________________________

Its: ______________________________________



PICO HOLDINGS, INC.


By:  ______________________________________

Its: ______________________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      13,942,067
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 45,074,127
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      25,789,348
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        25,993,000
<LOANS>                                    210,595,650
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,670,162
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             305,936,249
<DEPOSITS>                                 260,611,181
<SHORT-TERM>                                 4,950,160
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,063,040
<LONG-TERM>                                    931,844
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       322,372
<OTHER-SE>                                  37,057,652
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             305,936,249
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              9,808,208
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            2,099,530
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                12,683
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            11,920,421
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           4,257,729
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,581,058
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        7,339,363
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  165,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              5,578,673
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,189,591
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   2,099,532
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,099,532
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.65
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.43
<LOANS-NON>                                  2,275,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                    34,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                130,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,607,579
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  152,464
<RECOVERIES>                                    50,047
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,670,162
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         2,670,162
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA
, Respondent
,

v.

FRANK SILVA ROQUE
, Petitioner

.
No. 1 CA

- CR 16

- 0104 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR 2001

- 095385 The Honorable Christopher A. Coury
, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELI EF DENIED

COUNSEL
Maricopa County Attorney ’ s Office , Phoenix By Diane Meloche Counsel for Respondent

Frank Silva Roque
, Buckeye PetitionerSTATE v. ROQUE Decision of the Court

2 MEMORANDUM DECISION

Judge Kenton D. Jones delivered the decision of the Court, in which Presiding Judge Margaret H. Downie and Judge Donn Kessler 1 joined.

J O N E S , Judge:

¶1 Frank Roque petitions this C ourt for review from the dismissal of his untimely and successive petition for post

- conviction relief. We have considered the petition for review and, for the reasons stated, grant review and deny relief.

¶2 The factual and procedural hist ory has been set forth by this C ourt on more than one occasion and need not be repeated here. See State v. Roque, 2 CA

- CR 2016

- 0224

- PR , 2016 WL 4098665, at *1, ¶ 2 (Ariz. App. Ju ly 29, 2016) (mem. decision); State v. Roque , 1 CA

- CR 13

- 0705 PRPC, 2015 WL 917820 , at *1, ¶ 2 ( Ariz. App. Mar. 3, 2015) (mem. decision).

¶3 Roque commenced the present post

- con viction relief proceeding in October 2015. He alleged ineffective assistance of counsel, a significant change in the law, and newly discovered evidence

. He also asserted violations of Miranda v. Arizona , 384 U.S. 436, 478

- 79 (1966), and the marital privi lege rule. Finally, he argued the trial court erroneously admitted evidence of an invalid prior conviction. The court summarily dismissed his notice of post

- conviction relief, and this petition for review followed. We review a summary denial of petition for post

- conviction relief for an abuse of discretion. State v. Bennett , 213 Ariz. 562, 566, ¶ 17 (2006) (citation omitted).

¶4 We find no abuse of discretion here. The trial court dismissed Roque’s post

- conviction relief proceeding in an order that clea rly identified and correctly ruled upon the issues raised. Further more , the court did so in a thorough, well

- reasoned manner that will allow any future court to understand the court ’ s rulings. Under these circumstances, “ [n] o useful
p urpose would be serv ed by this [C]ourt rehashing the trial court’ s correct

1 The Honorable Donn Kessler, Retired Judge of the Court of Appeals, Division One, has been authorized to sit in this matter pursuant to Article 6, Section 20, of the Arizona Constitution.STATE v. ROQUE Decision of the Court

3 ruling in a written decision .” State v. Whipple , 177 Ariz . 272, 274 (App. 1993). Ther efore, we adopt the trial court’ s ruling.

¶5 We grant review and deny relief.
EX-33.7
Report on Assessment of Compliance

with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria


1. The undersigned authorized officer of LandAmerica Tax and Flood Services,
Inc. (the "Company") is responsible for assessing the Company's compliance with
the applicable servicing criteria as defined in 17 CFR Part 229 Section
1122(d)(4)(xi) and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the "Regulation AB Servicing Criteria") for
residential and commercial mortgage backed securities for which the Company
served as third-party property tax payment provider on the underlying collateral
(the "Platform"). Except as set forth in the preceding sentence, the servicing
criteria set forth in 17 CFR Part 229 Section 1122(d) are not applicable to the
activities the Company performed with respect to the Platform.

2. The Company used the criteria in 17 CFR Part 229 Section 1122(d) to assess
the compliance with the applicable Regulation AB Servicing Criteria.

3. Under one of the services offered by the Company, some customers may elect to
remit tax payments directly to tax agencies without having the Company remit
those property tax payments through our tax payment service. We refer to these
customers as "non-outsourced servicer customers." With respect to these
non-outsourced customers and the services the Company delivered pursuant to the
servicing criteria set forth in 17 CFR Part 229 Section 1122(d)(4)(xi), the
Company's assertion is strictly limited to its processing of tax payments
submitted through the Company's tax payment service.

4. With respect to servicing criteria set forth in 17 CFR Part 229 Section
1122(d)(4)(xii), the Company's assertion is strictly limited to its processing
of property tax penalty payments. The Company has determined that its servicer
customers may also have access to systems that enable those servicers to process
penalties through obligor escrow accounts. Management's assessment of compliance
does not relate to the actual or potential activities of other parties with
access to obligor escrow accounts.

5. Based on such assessment, management believes that, as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2007, the Company has complied in all material respects with
the Regulation AB Servicing Criteria related to the servicing of the Platform
taken as a whole.

6. The registered public accounting firm of Grant Thornton, LLP, has issued an
attestation report on the Company's assessment of compliance with the Regulation
AB Servicing Criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Date: February 6, 2008

LandAmerica Tax and Flood Services, Inc.

By: /s/ Robert Ige
Name: Robert Ige
Its:  Executive Vice President
Exhibit 32.1

            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE & FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Intercell
International  Corporation  for the  quarter  ended  June 30,  2006,  I, R. Mark
Richards, Chief Executive Officer of Intercell International Corporation, hereby
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

        a.     such Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Intercell  International
               Corporation  for the quarter ended June 30, 2006,  fully complies
               with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
               Exchange Act of 1934; and

        b.     the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
               of Intercell International Corporation for the quarter ended June
               30,  2006,  fairly  presents,  in  all  material  respects,   the
               financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  Intercell
               International Corporation.




                                                 /s/R. Mark Richards
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 R. Mark Richards, Chief
                                                 Executive Officer


Date:    August 14, 2006



A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Intercell  International  Corporation  and  will  be  retained  by
Intercell International Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Calogero Chiarelli et al., Respondents, v Andreas Kotsifos, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

[772 NYS2d 531]

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Andreas Kotsifos appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Burke, J.), dated September 11, 2002, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion, inter alia, for summary judgment on the complaint and for the appointment of a referee and denied his cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and (2) an order of the same court also dated September 11, 2002, which, among other things, appointed a referee to compute the amount due to the plaintiffs.

Ordered that the orders are affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The plaintiffs commenced this mortgage foreclosure action against Andreas Kotsifos (hereinafter the appellant), among others, in 1995. The original notice of pendency expired in 1998, and was not extended *(see*CPLR 6513). The plaintiffs filed a new notice of pendency in 2001.

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the plaintiffs were entitled to file a new notice of pendency after the first notice of pendency expired *(see Horowitz v Griggs,*2 AD3d 404 [2003]; *Campbell v Smith,*309 AD2d 581 [2003]; *cf. Matter of Sakow,*97 NY2d 436 [2002]). The plaintiffs therefore were in compliance with the notice of pendency prerequisite to obtaining a judgment in this action *(see*RPAPL 1331). The appellant’s cross motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the notice of pendency was invalid was properly denied.

The plaintiffs established their prima facie entitlement to *346summary judgment by producing evidence of the mortgage and that the appellant had defaulted on the payments due *(see EMC Mtge. Corp. v Riverdale Assoc.,*291 AD2d 370 [2002]; *Green Point Sav. Bank v Spivey,*253 AD2d 410 [1998]). The appellant failed to present evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to his nonpayment of the mortgage. Any evidence of his partial payment of the debt may be presented at the hearing before the referee.

The Supreme Court properly determined that the evidence presented by the appellant failed to raise a triable issue of fact with respect to his alleged defenses of usury, bad faith, and violation of the Truth in Lending Act (15 USC § 1601*et seq.).*

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit or are improperly raised for the first time in his reply brief *(see Drake v Drake,*296 AD2d 566 [2002]; *Morgan v New York City Hous. Auth.,*255 AD2d 565 [1998]). Florio, J.P., Krausman, Schmidt and Townes, JJ., concur.
#### William J. Prussia, as Overseer of the Poor, Respondent, v. George Guenther, Appellant.

*639—Judgment affirmed on the opinion of the county judge.

Haight, J., not Bitting.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4322-6 Filed: 10/18/19 Entered: 10/18/19 18:29:08 Page 1

of 2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4322-6 Filed: 10/18/19 Entered: 10/18/19 18:29:08 Page 2

of 2
EXHIBIT
        32.1
  **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 **(18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**
 
 
 In
        connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Summit Environmental
        Corporation, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31,
        2005 (the “Report”), I, Chris Dellinges, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
        hereby certify that to my knowledge:
 
 (1) The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78o(d)); and
 
 (2) The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated:
        November 22, 2005
 */s/
        Chris Dellinges*
 Chris
        Dellinges
 Chief
        Financial Officer
 
 
 The
        above
        certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB
        or as a separate disclosure document.