alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Alvin *F.*Hill, Respondent, v. Philip Spencer and others, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Pratt, J.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8084

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. DARIUS JAVON JONES, a/k/a Nudie, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:02-cr-00225-JBF-7)

Submitted: December 16, 2008 Decided: December 29, 2008

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darius Javon Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Darryl James Mitchell, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Darius Javon Jones appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jones , No. 2:02-cr00225-JBF-7 (E.D. Va. Aug. 28, 2008). Jones’ Motion to Request Copies of Record and Transcript is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of TransAct Energy Corp. a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-K for the annual period ending December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Roderick C. Bartlett, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    /s/ Roderick C Bartlett Roderick C Bartlett Chief Financial Officer Date: February 5, 2016
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3615-1 Filed: 08/20/19 Entered: 08/20/19 14:54:58 Page 1

of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

MATTHEW A. LESNICK (SBN 177594)

 matt@lesnickprince.com 

CHRISTOPHER E. PRINCE (SBN 183553) 

 cprince@lesnickprince.com 

LESNICK PRINCE & PAPPAS LLP 

185 Pier Avenue, Suite 103 

Santa Monica, CA 90405 

Telephone: (310) 396-0964 

Facsimile: (310) 396-0963 

Attorneys for Interested Party 

CH2M HILL Engineers, Inc. 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re

PG&E CORPORATION, 

Debtor. 

Case No. 19-30088

Chapter 11 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND 

REQUEST FOR NOTICE 

 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that CH2M HILL Engineers, Inc. (“CH2M”) 

hereby requests that all notices given or required to be given in the above-captioned 

case, and all papers served or required to be served in this bankruptcy proceeding 

including, without limitation, all notices pursuant to Federal Rules of Bankruptcy 

Procedure 2002, 3017 and 9007, be given and served upon: 

Robert Albery 

Associate General Counsel 

Jacobs Engineering 

9191 South Jamaica Street 

Englewood, CO 80112 

Tel: (720) 286-2242 

E-mail: robert.albery@jacobs.com 

-- and -- 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 130 Filed: 01/30/19 Entered: 01/30/19 15:23:00 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

 

2

Matthew A. Lesnick 

Christopher E. Prince 

LESNICK PRINCE & PAPPAS LLP 

185 Pier Avenue, Suite 103 

Santa Monica, CA 90405 

Tel: (310) 396-0964 

Fax: (310) 396-0963 

E-mail: matt@lesnickprince.com 

 cprince@lesnickprince.com 

Neither this Request for Notice nor any subsequent appearance, pleading, 

claim or suit is intended or shall be deemed to waive CH2M’s: (i) right to have all 

appropriate matters heard and resolved by the California Public Utilities Commission, the 

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, or any other agency of competent jurisdiction; 

(ii) right(s) to have all core matters subject to Article III jurisdiction heard and decided by a 

district judge; (iii) right(s) to have final orders in non-core matters entered only after de 

novo review by a district judge; (iv) right(s) to trial by jury in any proceeding so triable 

herein or in any case, controversy or proceeding related hereto; (v) right(s) to have the 

reference withdrawn by the United States District Court in any matter subject to mandatory 

or discretionary withdrawal; or (vi) other rights, claims, actions, defenses, setoffs or 

recoupments to which CH2M is, or may be, entitled under agreements, in law, or in equity, 

all of which rights, claims, actions, defenses, setoffs, and recoupments expressly are 

reserved. 

DATED: January 30, 2019 LESNICK PRINCE & PAPPAS LLP 

By: /s/Matthew A. Lesnick 

Matthew A. Lesnick 

Attorneys for Interested Party 

CH2M HILL Engineers, Inc. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 130 Filed: 01/30/19 Entered: 01/30/19 15:23:00 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 544 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 544

  To amend title XXVII of the Public Health Service Act to change the 
      permissible age variation in health insurance premium rates.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2013

  Mr. Gingrey of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Matheson, Mr. Cassidy, Mr. 
  Boustany, Mr. Walden, Mr. Jones, Mr. Rogers of Michigan, Mr. Roe of 
 Tennessee, Mr. Hall, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Johnson of Ohio, Mr. Terry, 
 and Mr. Rokita) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title XXVII of the Public Health Service Act to change the 
      permissible age variation in health insurance premium rates.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Letting Insurance Benefit Everyone 
Regardless of Their Youth (LIBERTY) Act''.

SEC. 2. CHANGE IN PERMISSIBLE AGE VARIATION IN HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM 
              RATES.

    (a) In General.--Section 2701(a)(1)(A)(iii) of the Public Health 
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg(a)(1)(A)(iii)), as inserted by section 
1201(4) of Public Law 111-148, is amended by striking ``3 to 1 for 
adults (consistent with section 2707(c))'' and inserting ``5 to 1 for 
adults (consistent with section 2707(c)) or such other ratio for adults 
(consistent with section 2707(c)) as the State involved may provide''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply as if it was included in the enactment of Public Law 111-148.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. The Grand Lodge of the Empire Order of Mutual Aid of the State of New York; Jane Draper, Claimant, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements. No opinion.

Putnam, J., not acting.
Exhibit 31(ii)
                                 --------------


                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Steve Bailey, certify that:


     1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
          required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report
          on Form 10-K of CWHEQ Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2006-S10 (the
          "Exchange Act periodic reports");

     2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
          whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
          to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
          light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
          misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
          information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
          covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
          reports;

     4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
          servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance review(s)
          conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement(s) required
          in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
          disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer(s) have
          fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all
          material respects; and

     5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
          for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
          assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
          securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
          Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
          have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
          disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
          described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
          10-K.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
     provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York,
     as Trustee.

Date: March 26, 2007


      /s/ Steve Bailey
      ----------------------------
      Steve Bailey
      Senior Managing Director, Loan Administration
[664 NE2d 499, 641 NYS2d 588]

#### Paul Grassi et al., Appellants, v Kurt Ulrich et al., Respondents.

Decided February 20, 1996

*955APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Cynthia Feathers,*Saratoga Springs, for appellants.

*Horigan, Horigan, Pennock & Lombardo, P. C.,*Amsterdam *(James A. Lombardo*of counsel), for respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the matter remitted to that Court for further proceedings in accordance with this memorandum.

Plaintiff Paul Grassi commenced this personal injury action against defendants for injuries to his neck, left arm and left hand allegedly sustained after the car driven by defendant Kurt Ulrich collided with plaintiff’s vehicle. Defendants stipulated that Ulrich’s negligence caused the accident, but presented expert proof to establish that plaintiff’s injuries were the result of a preexisting degenerative condition and not the *956accident, as plaintiff’s experts opined. The jury returned a verdict in defendants’ favor, and the trial court denied plaintiff’s motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a) to set aside the verdict as against the weight of the evidence.

The Appellate Division erred in curtailing its review of the denial of that motion after simply finding record evidence to support the jury’s verdict *(see, Lolik v Big V Supermarket,*86 NY2d 744). Having found sufficient evidence to support the verdict, the Court was then required to consider the conflicting medical evidence presented by plaintiff and determine "whether ' "the evidence so preponderate^] in favor of the [plaintiff] that [the verdict] could not have been reached on any fair interpretation of the evidence” ’ ” *(id.,*at 746, quoting *Moffatt v Moffatt,*86 AD2d 864, *affd*62 NY2d 875).

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick concur in memorandum.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order reversed, etc.
BAKER 

&

HOSTETLER LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

 

5REHUW$-XOLDQ6%1

&HFLO\$'XPDV6%1

%$.(5	+267(7/(5//3

%DWWHU\6WUHHW6XLWH

6DQ)UDQFLVFR&$

7HOHSKRQH 

)DFVLPLOH 

(PDLOUMXOLDQ#EDNHUODZFRP

(PDLOFGXPDV#EDNHUODZFRP

(ULF(6DJHUPDQ6%1

/DXUHQ7$WWDUG6%1

%$.(5	+267(7/(5//3

:LOVKLUH%RXOHYDUG6XLWH

/RV$QJHOHV&$

7HOHSKRQH 

)DFVLPLOH 

(PDLOHVDJHUPDQ#EDNHUODZFRP

(PDLOODWWDUG#EDNHUODZFRP

Counsel for Official Committee of Tort Claimants

81,7('67$7(6%$1.5837&<&2857

1257+(51',675,&72)&$/,)251,$

6$1)5$1&,6&2',9,6,21

,QUH

3*	(&25325$7,21

DQG

3$&,),&*$6$1'(/(&75,&

&203$1<

  'HEWRUV

 &DVH1R'0

&KDSWHU

/HDG&DVH

-RLQWO\$GPLQLVWHUHG

Ƒ$IIHFWV3*	(&RUSRUDWLRQ

Ƒ$IIHFWV3DFLILF*DVDQG(OHFWULF&RPSDQ\

Ŷ$IIHFWVERWK'HEWRUV

*All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case, 

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

 

&(57,),&$7(2)6(59,&(

 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4039 Filed: 09/30/19 Entered: 09/30/19 14:04:05 Page 1 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4039 Filed: 09/30/19 Entered: 09/30/19 14:04:05 Page 2 of

3
(;+,%,7$

1RWLFH3DUWLHV6HUYLFH/LVW

6HUYHGDVVHWIRUWKEHORZ

^Z/Wd/KE ED EKd/ED Z^^ D/>

Dd,KK&

^Zs/

ŽƵŶƐĞůƚŽĞďƚŽƌƐ tĞŝů͕'ŽƚƐŚĂůΘDĂŶŐĞƐ>>W

ƚƚŶ͗^ƚĞƉŚĞŶ<ĂƌŽƚŬŝŶ͕ZĂĐŚĂĞů&ŽƵƐƚ͕:ĞƐƐŝĐĂ>ŝŽƵ͕DĂƚƚŚĞǁ'ŽƌĞŶ

ϳςϳ&ŝĨƚŚǀĞŶƵĞEĞǁzŽƌŬ͕EzϭϬϭρϯͲϬϭϭε

ƐƚĞƉŚĞŶ͘ŬĂƌŽƚŬŝŶΛǁĞŝů͘ĐŽŵƌĂĐŚĂĞů͘ĨŽƵƐƚΛǁĞŝů͘ĐŽŵũĞƐƐŝĐĂ͘ůŝŽƵΛǁĞŝů͘ĐŽŵŵĂƚƚŚĞǁ͘ŐŽƌĞŶΛǁĞŝů͘ĐŽŵ ŵĂŝů

ŽƵŶƐĞůƚŽĞďƚŽƌƐ <ĞůůĞƌΘĞŶǀĞŶƵƚƚŝ>>W ƚƚŶ͗dŽďŝĂƐ<ĞůůĞƌ͕:ĂŶĞ<ŝŵ

ςρϬĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕^ƵŝƚĞϭεϬϬ

^ĂŶ&ƌĂŶĐŝƐĐŽ͕εκϭϬΘ

ƚŬĞůůĞƌΛŬĞůůĞƌďĞŶǀĞŶƵƚƚŝ͘ĐŽŵũŬŝŵΛŬĞůůĞƌďĞŶǀĞŶƵƚƚŝ͘ĐŽŵ ŵĂŝů

ĞďƚŽƌƐ

W'ΘŽƌƉŽƌĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚWĂĐŝĨŝĐ'ĂƐĂŶĚůĞĐƚƌŝĐŽŵƉĂŶLJ ƚƚŶ͗:ĂŶĞƚ>ŽĚƵĐĂ

ϳϳĞĂůĞ^ƚƌĞĞƚW͘K͘ŽdžϳϳϬϬϬϬ^ĂŶ&ƌĂŶĐŝƐĐŽ͕εκϭϬρ &ŝƌƐƚůĂƐƐDĂŝů

KĨĨŝĐĞŽĨƚŚĞhŶŝƚĞĚ^ƚĂƚĞƐdƌƵƐƚĞĞ KĨĨŝĐĞŽĨƚŚĞhŶŝƚĞĚ^ƚĂƚĞƐdƌƵƐƚĞĞ

ƚƚŶ͗:ĂŵĞƐ>͘^ŶLJĚĞƌ͕ƐƋ͘ΘdŝŵŽƚŚLJ>ĂĨƌĞĚĚŝ͕ƐƋ

κρϬ'ŽůĚĞŶ'ĂƚĞǀĞŶƵĞρƚŚ&ůŽŽƌ͕^ƵŝƚĞηϬρͲϬϭρϯ^ĂŶ&ƌĂŶĐŝƐĐŽ͕εκϭϬϮ

:ĂŵĞƐ͘>͘^ŶLJĚĞƌΛƵƐĚŽũ͘ŐŽǀƚŝŵŽƚŚLJ͘Ɛ͘ůĂĨĨƌĞĚŝΛƵƐĚŽũ͘ŐŽǀ

ŵĂŝů

ŽƵŶƐĞůĨŽƌƚŚĞKĨĨŝĐŝĂůŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞŽĨhŶƐĞĐƵƌĞĚƌĞĚŝƚŽƌƐ DŝůďĂŶŬ>>W

ƚƚŶ͗ĞŶŶŝƐ&͘ƵŶŶĞ͕^ĂŵƵĞů͘<ŚĂůŝů

ρρ,ƵĚƐŽŶzĂƌĚƐEĞǁzŽƌŬ͕EzϭϬϬϬϭͲϮϭςϯ

ĚĚƵŶŶĞΛŵŝůďĂŶŬ͘ĐŽŵƐŬŚĂůŝůΛŵŝůďĂŶŬ͘ĐŽŵ ŵĂŝů

ŽƵŶƐĞůĨŽƌƚŚĞKĨĨŝĐŝĂůŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞŽĨhŶƐĞĐƵƌĞĚƌĞĚŝƚŽƌƐ DŝůďĂŶŬ>>W

ƚƚŶ͗WĂƵů^͘ƌŽŶnjŽŶ͕'ƌĞŐŽƌLJ͘ƌĂLJ͕dŚŽŵĂƐZ͘<ƌĞůůĞƌ

ϮϬϮεĞŶƚƵƌLJWĂƌŬ͕ϯϯƌĚ&ůŽŽƌ>ŽƐŶŐĞůĞƐ͕εϬϬςϳ

WĂƌŽŶnjŽŶΛŵŝůďĂŶŬ͘ĐŽŵ'ďƌĂLJΛŵŝůďĂŶŬ͘ĐŽŵd<ƌĞůůĞƌΛŵŝůďĂŶŬ͘ĐŽŵ ŵĂŝů

&ĞĞdžĂŵŝŶĞƌ ƚƚŶ͗ƌƵĐĞ͘DĂƌŬĞůů

ρκϭE͘&ĂŝƌďĂŶŬƐŽƵƌƚ͕^ƵŝƚĞϮϮϬϬŚŝĐĂŐŽ͕/>ςϬςϭϭͲϯϳϭϬ

ďĂŵĞdžĂŵƉŐĞΛŐŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵƉŐĞΛůĞŐĂůĚĞĐŽĚĞƌ͘ĐŽŵƚƌĂĐĞLJƌŐĂůůĞŐŽƐΛŐŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵ ŵĂŝů

ŽƵŶƐĞůƚŽ&ĞĞdžĂŵŝŶĞƌ ^ĐŽƚƚ,͘DĐEƵƚƚ ^ĐŽƚƚ,͘DĐEƵƚƚ

ϯϮκtĂƌƌĞŶZŽĂĚ^ĂŶDĂƚĞŽ͕εκκϬϮ ƐŵĐŶƵƚƚΛŵůͲƐĨ͘ĐŽŵ ŵĂŝů

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4039 Filed: 09/30/19 Entered: 09/30/19 14:04:05 Page 3 of

3
#### STATE v. WILLIAM BATTLE.

(Filed 19 February, 1930.)

Criminal Law G m — Conviction may not be had on evidence which raises only conjecture or suspicion of guilt.

A conviction of larceny may not be had upon evidence which creates only a conjecture or suspicion that the defendant had committed the offense.

Appeal by defendant from *Moore, Special Judge,*at September Term, 1929, of Edgecombe.

Reversed.

Tbe defendant was charged (1) with breaking and entering a dwelling-house of Sam Evans and stealing money from a meter box in the possession of Sam Evans, the property of the city of Rocky Mount; (2) with receiving same, knowing the property to have been stolen. When the breaking and entering took place, the evidence would indicate it was about 12:30 in the day time, some time in February, 1929. The amount alleged to have been stolen was about $2.75, and was taken from a meter box on the back porch of Sam Evans’ house. s

The defendant introduced no evidence, but in the testimony of witnesses for the State he denied the charge. There was ui verdict of guilty. The defendant, at the close of the State’s evidence, moved for judgment as in case of nonsuit, C. S., 4643, and also prayed that the court instruct the jury to return a verdict of not guilty. Defendant’s motion and prayer were refused. The defendant excepted, assigned error and ap-' pealed to the Supreme Court.

*Attorney-General Brummiti and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.*

*T. T. Thorne for defendant.*

Per Cubiam.

The defendant was charged with (1) breaking and entering a dwelling-house and stealing from a meter, box about $2.75; (2) for receiving same knowing the money to have been stolen.

We think there is merely a suspicion or conjecture in regard to the charges in the bill of indictment against defendant, but no sufficient evidence to be submitted to the jury. The judgment below is ’

Reversed.
Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic reporting of Glowpoint, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, David C. Trachtenberg, Chief
Executive Officer of Glowpoint the Company, hereby certify as of the date
hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United
States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

      1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company at the dates of and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

February 26, 2004


                                        /s/ David C. Trachtenberg
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        David C. Trachtenberg
                                        Chief Executive Officer


                                       40
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153-0119

Schedule 1 

Counterparty EP Agreement EP Amendment Cure Amount 

Hummingbird 

Energy Storage, 

LLC

Energy Storage Resource Adequacy 

Agreement dated June 1, 2018, as 

previously amended by letters dated 

October 11, 2018, November 27, 2018, 

December 26, 2018, and March 28, 

2019, and the Site Amendment to the 

Energy Storage Resource Adequacy 

Agreement dated July 26, 2019.

Amendment to 

Energy Storage Resource Adequacy 

Agreement dated July 31, 2019. 

$0 

mNOC AERS 

LLC

Behind the Retail Meter Capacity 

Storage Agreement dated June 1, 2018, 

as previously amended by letters dated 

October 11, 2018 and November 27, 

2018.

Amendment to 

Capacity Storage Agreement dated July 

31, 2019. 

$0 

Re Gaskell West 

3 LLC

Power Purchase Agreement dated 

September 22, 2017.

Amendment to 

Power Purchase Agreement dated July 

31, 2019.

$0 

Re Gaskell West 

4 LLC

Power Purchase Agreement dated 

September 22, 2017.

Amendment to 

Power Purchase Agreement dated July 

31, 2019.

$0 

Re Gaskell West 

5 LLC

Power Purchase Agreement dated 

September 22, 2017.

Amendment to 

Power Purchase Agreement dated July 

31, 2019.

$0 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3673-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 12:05:20 Page 1

of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153-0119

EXHIBIT 1-L

Rule 21 Pilot Testing Services

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-13 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page 1

of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-13 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page 2

of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-13 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page 3

of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-13 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page 4

of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-13 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page 5

of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-13 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page 6

of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-13 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page 7

of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-13 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page 8

of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-13 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page 9

of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-13 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page

10 of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-13 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page

11 of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-13 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page

12 of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-13 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page

13 of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-13 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page

14 of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-13 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page

15 of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-13 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page

16 of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4602-13 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 19:32:50 Page

17 of 17
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

 

Form 10-Q

 

(MarkOne)

[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TOSECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011

 

or

 

[]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THESECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

For the transition period from _________to _________

 

Commission file number 0-14578

 

 

HCW PENSION REAL ESTATE FUND LIMITEDPARTNERSHIP 

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to befiled by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during thepreceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was requiredto file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements forthe past 90 days.  

[X]Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted onits corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to besubmitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of thischapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that theregistrant was required to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, anaccelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reportingcompany.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “acceleratedfiler” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes __ No   X_
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership (the “Partnership”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Harold Brown, the Treasurer and a Director of the Partnership’s GeneralPartner, NewReal, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18.U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of my knowledge:

 

(1)       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.

 
|   | /s/ HAROLD BROWN                         |
|--------|------------------------------------------|
|   |                                     |
|   | Harold  Brown                            |
|   | Principal  Financial Officer             |
|   | (Treasurer  and Director of              |
|   | the  Partnership’s General Partner, |
|   | NewReal, Inc.)                      |

 

November 14, 2005

 

----