3932 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 15 / Monday, January 25, 2010 / Notices 

TA–W–71,025; Canon USA, Inc., 

Semiconductor Equipment Division, 

Boise, ID: June 2, 2008. 

TA–W–71,061; Elkay Manufacturing 

Company, Corporate Headquarters, 

Leased Workers of Accountemps, 

Oak Brook, IL: June 8, 2008. 

TA–W–71,812; Sigmatron International, 

Inc., Snelling Personnel Services 

and Team Force Staffing, Hayward, 

CA: July 24, 2008. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(c) (downstream producer for a firm 

whose workers are certified eligible to 

apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have 

been met. 

None. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(f) (firms identified by the 

International Trade Commission) of the 

Trade Act have been met. 

TA–W–72,820; Maverick Tube LLC, DBA 

Tenaris Counce, Counce, TN: 

November 24, 2009. 

TA–W–72,821; Maverick Tube LLC, DBA 

Texas Arai, Houston, TX: November 

24, 2007. 

TA–W–72,822; Maverick Tube, LLC, 

DBA TenairsConroe, Conroe, TX: 

November 24, 2007. 

Negative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, the 

investigation revealed that the eligibility 

criteria for worker adjustment assistance 

have not been met for the reasons 

specified. 

The investigation revealed that the 

criterion under paragraph (a)(1), or 

(b)(1), or (c)(1) (employment decline or 

threat of separation) of section 222 has 

not been met. 

TA–W–70,646; Tenneco, Inc., Corporate 

Engineering Center, Grass Lake, MI. 

TA–W–71,281; International Automotive 

Components Group North America, 

Troy, MI. 

The investigation revealed that the 

criteria under paragraphs (a)(2)(A)(i) 

(decline in sales or production, or both) 

and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or 

services to a foreign country) of section 

222 have not been met. 

TA–W–70,646; Tenneco, Inc., Corporate 

Engineering Center, Grass Lake, MI. 

TA–W–71,281; International Automotive 

Components Group North America, 

Troy, MI. 

The investigation revealed that the 

criteria under paragraphs (a)(2)(A) 

(increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift 

in production or services to a foreign 

country) of section 222 have not been 

met. 

TA–W–70,223; Eaton Aeroquip, Inc., 

Mountain Home, AR. 

TA–W–70,294; Quala-Die, Inc., St. 

Marys, PA. 

TA–W–70,302; Pilgrims Pride, Leased 

Workers of PSSI, Farmerville, LA. 

TA–W–70,305; Shorewood Packaging, A 

Business Unit of International 

Paper, Springfield, OR. 

TA–W–70,346; Nabors Drilling USA, LP, 

Fruita, CO. 

TA–W–70,395; Dawson Metal Company, 

Inc., Industrial Division, 

Jamestown, NY. 

TA–W–70,618A; Shadowline Sales Inc., 

Shadowline, Inc., Myrtle Beach, SC. 

TA–W–70,618B; Shadowline Sales Inc., 

Shadowline, Inc., Pigeon Forge, TN. 

TA–W–70,618; Shadowline Sales Inc., 

Shadowline, Inc., St. Augustine, FL. 

TA–W–70,705; Watertronics, LLC, 

Hartland, WI. 

TA–W–70,732; Pilgrims Pride 

Corporation, Clinton, AR. 

TA–W–70,755; Pilgrims Pride 

Corporation, Wilstaff, Eldorado, 

AR. 

TA–W–70,783; T and S Hardwoods, Inc., 

Sylva, NC. 

TA–W–70,967; Gerstenslager Company, 

Worthington Industries, Automotive 

Stamping Div., Wooster, OH. 

TA–W–70,987A; Red Oak Die Casting, 

Quad Cast, Inc., Red Oak, IA. 

TA–W–70,987; Quad City Die Casting, 

Inc, Moline, IL. 

TA–W–71,230; Monaco Coach 

Corporation, N/K/S MNC 

Corporation, Coburg, OR. 

TA–W–72,041; Aleris Blanking and Rim 

Products, Inc., Division of Aleris 

International, Inc., Terre Haute, IN. 

TA–W–70,052A; Transfreight, LLC, 

Mitsui & Co., Ltd, Brownstown, MI. 

TA–W–70,052; Transfreight, LLC, Mitsui 

& Co., Ltd, Princeton, IN. 

TA–W–70,333; URS Corporation, URS 

Division/East 3 Regional Business 

Unit, Grand Rapids, MI. 

TA–W–70,343; WuXi AppTec, Inc., 

Biological Manufacturing, Leased 

Workers from Aerotek, 

Philadelphia, PA. 

TA–W–70,349; Trane, Residential 

Systems Division, Fort Smith, AR. 

TA–W–70,482; Source Providers, Inc.— 

Comprehensive Logistics, Inc., 

Lansing, MI. 

TA–W–70,541; Samuel Aaron, Inc., Long 

Island City, NY. 

TA–W–70,585; Johnson Control, Inc., 

Rockwood, MI. 

TA–W–70,772; United Airlines, Inc., 

Seattle-Tacoma Int’l Airport Line 

Maintenance Division, Seattle, WA. 

TA–W–71,042; Pacific Rail Services, 

LLC, Seattle, WA. 

TA–W–71,275; United Airlines, Inc., 

Portland Airport Line Maintenance 

Division, Portland, OR. 

TA–W–71,301; Blazing Color, 

Bloomington, MN. 

TA–W–71,325; Smartparts, Inc., Totowa, 

NJ. 

TA–W–71,550; IBM Corporation, Global 

Technology Services Division, 

Chicago, IL. 

TA–W–71,559; Gresham Chrysler—Jeep, 

Inc., Gresham, OR. 

TA–W–71,579; United Airlines, Inc., 

Jamaica, NY. 

TA–W–71,723; United Airlines, Inc., 

O’Hare International Airport Line 

Maintenance Division, Chicago, IL. 

TA–W–71,989; United Airlines, Inc., 

Newark Int’l Airport Line 

Maintenance Division, Newark, NJ. 

TA–W–71,990; United Airlines, Inc., La 

Guardia Airport Line Maintenance 

Division, Flushing, NY. 

TA–W–72,216; Gwynn Lumber and 

Reload, Inc., Eureka, MT. 

TA–W–72,499; Hamilton Fairfield 

Dodge Jeep, Hamilton, OH. 

TA–W–72,527; Saturn of Green Bay, 

Inc., Green Bay, WI. 

The investigation revealed that the 

criteria under paragraphs (b)(2) and 

(b)(3) (public agency acquisition of 

services from a foreign country) of 

section 222 have not been met. 

None. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria of Section 222(c)(2) has not been 

met. The workers’ firm (or subdivision) 

is not a Supplier to or a Downstream 

Producer for a firm whose workers were 

certified as eligible to apply for TAA. 

TA–W–70,130; Pilgrims Pride Corp, 

Atkins, AR. 

I hereby certify that the aforementioned 

determinations were issued during the period 

of November 30 through December 11, 2009. 

Copies of these determinations are available 

for inspection in Room N–5428, U.S. 

Department of Labor, 200 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 during 

normal business hours or will be mailed to 

persons who write to the above address. 

Dated: January 15, 2010. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2010–1311 Filed 1–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Notice of Determinations Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 

U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 15 / Monday, January 25, 2010 / Notices 3933 

herein presents summaries of 

determinations regarding eligibility to 

apply for trade adjustment assistance for 

workers by (TA–W) number issued 

during the period of November 2 

through November 13, 2009. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for workers of 

a primary firm and a certification issued 

regarding eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(a) of the Act must be met. 

I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the 

following must be satisfied: 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) The sales or production, or both, 

of such firm have decreased absolutely; 

and 

(3) One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

(A) Imports of articles or services like 

or directly competitive with articles 

produced or services supplied by such 

firm have increased; 

(B) Imports of articles like or directly 

competitive with articles into which one 

or more component parts produced by 

such firm are directly incorporated, 

have increased; 

(C) Imports of articles directly 

incorporating one or more component 

parts produced outside the United 

States that are like or directly 

competitive with imports of articles 

incorporating one or more component 

parts produced by such firm have 

increased; 

(D) Imports of articles like or directly 

competitive with articles which are 

produced directly using services 

supplied by such firm, have increased; 

and 

(4) The increase in imports 

contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation and to the decline in the 

sales or production of such firm; or 

II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the 

following must be satisfied: 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

(A) There has been a shift by the 

workers’ firm to a foreign country in the 

production of articles or supply of 

services like or directly competitive 

with those produced/supplied by the 

workers’ firm; 

(B) There has been an acquisition 

from a foreign country by the workers’ 

firm of articles/services that are like or 

directly competitive with those 

produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; 

and 

(3) The shift/acquisition contributed 

importantly to the workers’ separation 

or threat of separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected workers in public agencies and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(b) of the Act must be met. 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the public agency have 

become totally or partially separated, or 

are threatened to become totally or 

partially separated; 

(2) The public agency has acquired 

from a foreign country services like or 

directly competitive with services 

which are supplied by such agency; and 

(3) The acquisition of services 

contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected secondary workers of a firm and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(c) of the Act must be met. 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the workers’ firm have 

become totally or partially separated, or 

are threatened to become totally or 

partially separated; 

(2) The workers’ firm is a Supplier or 

Downstream Producer to a firm that 

employed a group of workers who 

received a certification of eligibility 

under Section 222(a) of the Act, and 

such supply or production is related to 

the article or service that was the basis 

for such certification; and 

(3) Either— 

(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier 

and the component parts it supplied to 

the firm described in paragraph (2) 

accounted for at least 20 percent of the 

production or sales of the workers’ firm; 

or 

(B) A loss of business by the workers’ 

firm with the firm described in 

paragraph (2) contributed importantly to 

the workers’ separation or threat of 

separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected workers in firms identified by 

the International Trade Commission and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 222(f) 

of the Act must be met. 

(1) The workers’ firm is publicly 

identified by name by the International 

Trade Commission as a member of a 

domestic industry in an investigation 

resulting in— 

(A) An affirmative determination of 

serious injury or threat thereof under 

section 202(b)(1); 

(B) An affirmative determination of 

market disruption or threat thereof 

under section 421(b)(1); or 

(C) An affirmative final determination 

of material injury or threat thereof under 

section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A)); 

(2) The petition is filed during the 1- 

year period beginning on the date on 

which— 

(A) A summary of the report 

submitted to the President by the 

International Trade Commission under 

section 202(f)(1) with respect to the 

affirmative determination described in 

paragraph (1)(A) is published in the 

Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); 

or 

(B) Notice of an affirmative 

determination described in 

subparagraph (1) is published in the 

Federal Register; and 

(3) The workers have become totally 

or partially separated from the workers’ 

firm within— 

(A) The 1-year period described in 

paragraph (2); or 

(B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), 

the 1-year period preceding the 1-year 

period described in paragraph (2). 

Affirmative Determinations For Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The date following the company 

name and location of each 

determination references the impact 

date for all workers of such 

determination. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the 

Trade Act have been met. 

TA–W–70,545; Truck-Lite Company, 

Inc., Leased Workers from Adecco, 

Falconer, NY: May 8, 2008. 

TA–W–70,564; Gemeinhardt, LLC, 

Elkhart, IN: May 20, 2008. 

TA–W–70,879; Reynolds Consumer 

Products, Weyauwega Plant, d/b/a/ 

Presto, Weyauwega, WI: June 2, 

2008. 

TA–W–71,485; Albaugh, Inc., Leased 

Workers—Imko, Aerotek, Austin 

Nichols, and Lab Tech, St. Joseph, 

MO: June 23, 2008. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
3934 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 15 / Monday, January 25, 2010 / Notices 

TA–W–71,539; Plum Creek, Plum Creek 

Timber Company, Inc., LC Staffing, 

Columbia Falls, MT: July 1, 2008. 

TA–W–70,034; Vaagen Bros. Lumber, 

Inc., Leased Workers from 

Integrated Personnel, Colville, WA: 

May 18, 2008. 

TA–W–70,418; Pentair Water Pool and 

Spa, Acutrol Division, Auburn, CA: 

May 19, 2008. 

TA–W–70,526; Kennametal, Inc., 

Lyndonville, VT: May 18, 2008. 

TA–W–70,765; Nova Chemicals Inc, 

Performance Styrenics Division, 

Leased Workers from Allied Barton 

Security, Monaca, PA: May 20, 

2008. 

TA–W–71,458; FormTech Industries, 

LLC, Detroit, MI: June 26, 2008. 

TA–W–71,983; Weber Automotive 

Corporation, Leased Workers from 

Spherion and Johnson SVS Group, 

Summerville, SC: August 4, 2008. 

TA–W–72,047; Mark Two Engineering, 

Inc., Aerotek, Medley, FL: August 

13, 2008. 

TA–W–72,440; Wheatland Tube 

Company, Sharon, PA: July 22, 

2009. 

TA–W–71,035; Prestige Printing, J.L. 

Wauford, Inc./Leased from Kelly 

Services and Randstad USA, 

Madison, TN: June 5, 2008. 

TA–W–70,189; Signature Aluminum, 

Inc., Greenville, PA: May 18, 2008. 

TA–W–70,396; U.S. Steel Tubular 

Products, Wheeling Machine 

Products Division, Pine Bluff, AR: 

May 19, 2008. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or 

services) of the Trade Act have been 

met. 

TA–W–70,398; Cessna Aircraft 

Company, A Division of Textron, 

Leased Workers From Express 

Professional Staffing, Bend, OR: 

May 18, 2008. 

TA–W–70,453; Flextronics International, 

Limited, Leased Workers From 

Arotex, Flexicorps, Industrial 

Staffing, Elk Grove Village, IL: May 

20, 2008. 

TA–W–70,916; Agilent Technologies, 

Digital Test, Independent 

Contractors & Leased Workers 

Johnson Controls & Volt, Colorado 

Springs, CO: June 1, 2008. 

TA–W–70,972; Amphenol Backplane 

Systems, Amphenol Corp., 

Microtech and Accountemps, 

Nashua, NH: June 1, 2008. 

TA–W–70,984; Keihin IPT 

Manufacturing, Inc., Keihin NA, 

Formerly KIPT, Now KNA, Leased 

Workers from Spartan Staffing, 

Greenfield, IN: June 2, 2008. 

TA–W–71,094; Duro Textiles, LLC, Duro 

Finishing and Duro Textile Printers, 

Leased Workers From Olsten 

Staffing, Fall River, MA: May 5, 

2009. 

TA–W–71,355; Hollingsworth and Vose 

Company, Hawkinsville Division, 

Willstaff Worldwide, Hawkinsville, 

GA: June 10, 2008. 

TA–W–71,395; Startek USA, Inc., 

Subsidiary of Startek, Lynchburg, 

VA: June 24, 2008. 

TA–W–71,402; The Timken Company, 

Leased Workers from Adecco and 

Megaforce, Randleman, NC: June 

23, 2008. 

TA–W–71,431; Sealing Products 

Manufacturing, LLC, Dana Holding 

Corporation, LLC, ADECCO, 

Danville, KY: June 24, 2008. 

TA–W–71,478; United States Gypsum, 

Santa Fe Springs Plant, Santa Fe 

Springs, CA: June 29, 2008. 

TA–W–71,480; Hydro Aluminum 

Precision Tubing North America, 

Adrian, MI: June 26, 2008. 

TA–W–71,530; Nordson Corporation, 

Leased Workers from Kelly Services, 

Robert Half Management, Amherst, 

OH: July 1, 2008. 

TA–W–71,755; Bose Corporation, Park 

Place Manufacturing, Leased 

Workers from Randstad, 

Framingham, MA: July 17, 2008. 

TA–W–72,069; Rennoc Corporation, 

Vineland, NJ: August 18, 2008. 

TA–W–72,099; Motorola Inc., 

Government and Public Safety 

Division, Schaumburg, IL: August 

20, 2008. 

TA–W–72,167; Shorewood Packaging, 

Newport News, VA: August 25, 

2008. 

TA–W–72,169; NuTec Tooling Systems, 

Inc., Leased Workers from Career 

Concepts, Meadville, PA: August 

28, 2008. 

TA–W–72,199; Littelfuse LP, Leased 

Worker of Aerotek, Inc., Irving, TX: 

September 1, 2008. 

TA–W–72,244; Control Logic, Inc., 

Connelly Springs, NC: August 28, 

2008. 

TA–W–72,263; The H and H Trailer 

Company, Kingman Division, 

Kingman, AZ: September 8, 2008. 

TA–W–72,353; Philips Respironics, 

Royal Phillips Electronics Inc., 

Leased Workers of Qualcomm Inc., 

Bend, OR: September 17, 2009. 

TA–W–72,395; 3M/Southbridge, Leased 

Workers from Coworx Staffing 

Services, Southbridge, MA: 

September 17, 2008. 

TA–W–72,469; Magal-Senstar, Inc., 

Division of Magal Security Systems, 

Fremont, CA: September 30, 2008. 

TA–W–72,500; Hardinge, Inc., Leased 

Workers of Manpower, Elmira, NY: 

September 29, 2008. 

TA–W–72,503; Sycamore Networks, Inc., 

Silvx Network Management 

Software, Chelmsford, MA: 

November 25, 2008. 

TA–W–72,561; United Tool and Plastics, 

Inc., Waynesboro, VA: October 8, 

2008. 

TA–W–70,151; Smith and Nephew, Inc., 

Wound Management—Largo Div./ 

Leased Workers of Olsten Staffing, 

Largo, FL: May 4, 2008. 

TA–W–70,433; Weyerhaeuser NR, I– 

Level Division, Buckhannon, WV: 

May 18, 2008. 

TA–W–70,900; Acushnet Company, 

Leased Workers from Marquee 

Staffing, Carlsbad, CA: June 1, 

2008. 

TA–W–71,125; Intra Corporation, 

Westland, MI: June 10, 2008. 

TA–W–71,225; Dura Automotive 

Systems, Seats Division, Leased 

Workers from Furst Staffing, 

Stockton, IL: June 5, 2008. 

TA–W–71,259; Cooper Tools, Inc., 

Cooper Power Tools Division, 

Cooper Industries, Dayton, OH: 

June 22, 2009. 

TA–W–72,093; Atlantic Guest, Inc., 

Actuant Company, Berlin, CT: 

August 19, 2008. 

TA–W–72,133; North American Pulp 

Molding, LLC, Luberski, Inc/dba 

Hidden Villa Ranch, Haynesville, 

LA: August 25, 2008. 

TA–W–70,403; IBM Corporation, Global 

Business Services, El Segundo, CA: 

May 18, 2008. 

TA–W–70,916A; Agilent Technologies, 

Digital Test, Independent 

Contractors & Leased Workers 

Johnson Controls & Volt, Santa 

Rosa, CA: June 1, 2008. 

TA–W–71,031; International Business 

Machines Corp. (IBM), Global 

Business Services, ABB Account, 

Endicott, NY: May 20, 2008. 

TA–W–71,243; ACS Commercial 

Solutions, Inc., Affiliated Computer 

Services, Business Processing 

Solutions Group, Lexington, KY: 

June 3, 2008. 

TA–W–71,905; Accenture LLP, 

Randstad, MIR Mitchell & Co., 

Dayton, OH: July 30, 2008. 

TA–W–72,195; Experian, Global 

Technology Services Division, 

Leased Workers of Tapfin, Costa 

Mesa, CA: September 1, 2008. 

TA–W–72,272; Mitsubishi Motors R and 

D of America, Inc., Mitsubishi 

Motors North America, Technicon 

Int’l, Ann Arbor, MI: September 5, 

2008. 

TA–W–72,468; EDAG, Inc., Leased 

Workers from Partner Personnel, 

Inc., Auburn Hills, MI: September 

30, 2008. 

TA–W–72,491; Commerce Energy, Inc., 

Just Energy, Leased Workers from 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 15 / Monday, January 25, 2010 / Notices 3935 

Accountants International, etc., 

Costa Mesa, CA: October 2, 2008. 

TA–W–70,919; The Stride Rite 

Corporation, IT Solutions Delivery, 

Lexington, MA: June 1, 2008. 

TA–W–71,493; Evergreen Shipping 

Agency (America) Corporation, 

Leased Workers of Talent Tree, Inc., 

Charleston, SC: June 30, 2008. 

TA–W–71,507; Eastman Kodak, 

Graphics Communication Group, 

Adecco, Norwalk, CT: June 30, 

2008. 

TA–W–71,907; Allstate Insurance 

Company, Allstate Service Info., 

Kelly Services, Diamond Bar, CA: 

August 3, 2008. 

TA–W–71,924; Allstate Insurance 

Company, Allstate Motor Club 

Division, South Barrington, IL: July 

31, 2008. 

TA–W–72,048; FLSmidth, Inc., Cement 

Div., Leased Workers of Aerotek 

Contract, Engineering, Allied 

Personnel, Bethlehem, PA: August 

14, 2008. 

TA–W–72,480; Interdent Service 

Corporation, Central Business 

Office/Billing and Collections 

Department, Vancouver, WA: 

September 29, 2008. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(b) (adversely affected workers in 

public agencies) of the Trade Act have 

been met. 

None. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers 

are certified eligible to apply for TAA) 

of the Trade Act have been met. 

TA–W–70,143A; JL French Automotive 

Castings LLC, On-Site Leased 

Workers From Quality Personnel, 

Glasgow, KY: May 18, 2008. 

TA–W–70,143; JL French Automotive 

Castings LLC, On-Site Leased 

Workers From Labor Ready, 

Sheboygan, WI: May 18, 2009. 

TA–W–70,457; Core Manufacturing, 

Multi-Plastics, Inc., Division Sipco, 

Inc., M-Ploy, Saegertown, PA: May 

20, 2008. 

TA–W–70,481; Kaiser Aluminum 

Fabricated Products, LLC, 

Richmond, VA: May 21, 2008. 

TA–W–70,611; Janesville Acoustics, A 

Unit of Jason, Inc., Norwalk, OH: 

May 22, 2008. 

TA–W–70,773; Microfibres, Inc., 

Pawtucket, RI: April 24, 2009. 

TA–W–70,782; BASF, Coatings Division, 

Leased Workers from Adecco, 

Greenville, OH: May 20, 2008. 

TA–W–70,824; Bridgestone APM 

Company, Findlay, OH: May 29, 

2008. 

TA–W–70,885; Neff-Perkins Company, 

Perry Facility, Perry, OH: May 28, 

2008. 

TA–W–70,992; United Machine Works, 

Inc., Greenville, NC: May 26, 2008. 

TA–W–71,101; Stroh Die Casting 

Company, Inc, Milwaukee, WI: June 

5, 2008. 

TA–W–71,127; Lear Corporation, 

Seating Systems Division, 

Lordstown, OH: June 9, 2008. 

TA–W–71,706; Daimler Trucks North 

America, LLC, Gastonia 

Components and Logistics, 

Gastonia, NC: July 15, 2008. 

TA–W–71,725; Caterpillar, Inc., Large 

Power Systems Division, Mossville, 

IL: July 6, 2008. 

TA–W–72,223; Axletech International, 

Subsidiary of General Dynamics, 

Oshkosh, WI: August 31, 2008. 

TA–W–72,324; Katahdin Paper 

Company, Pulp Mill, East 

Millinocket, ME: September 15, 

2008. 

TA–W–70,660; Gold Canyon Mining and 

Construction, LLC, Apache 

Junction, AZ: May 20, 2008. 

TA–W–70,687; Marmon/Keystone 

Corporation, Marmon Distribution 

Services, LLC, East Butler Division, 

Butler, PA: May 21, 2008. 

TA–W–71,444; Applied Materials, Inc., 

Leased Workers from K2 Associates 

and Nstar, Rio Rancho, NM: June 

25, 2008. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(c) (downstream producer for a firm 

whose workers are certified eligible to 

apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have 

been met. 

TA–W–71,011; Cadon Acquisitions, LLC, 

Cadon Plating and Coatings, 

Phoenix Personnel, Wyandotte, MI: 

June 3, 2008. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(f) (firms identified by the 

International Trade Commission) of the 

Trade Act have been met. 

TA–W–71,425; US Steel Corporation, 

Fairfield, AL: July 21, 2007. 

Insert C–ITC. 

Negative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, the 

investigation revealed that the eligibility 

criteria for worker adjustment assistance 

have not been met for the reasons 

specified. 

The investigation revealed that the 

criterion under paragraph (a)(1), or 

(b)(1), or (c)(1)(employment decline or 

threat of separation) of section 222 has 

not been met. 

TA–W–70,356; Ford Motor Company, 

Powertrain Test Laboratories, 

Dearborn, MI. 

TA–W–70,389; Stanley Access 

Technologies, Farmington, CT. 

TA–W–71,382; Nortech Systems, Inc., 

Intercon 1 Division, Baxter, MN. 

TA–W–71,383; Nortech Systems, Inc., 

Aerospace Systems Division, 

Wayzata, MN. 

TA–W–72,325; C and K Powder Coating, 

Ebensburg, PA. 

The investigation revealed that the 

criteria under paragraphs (a)(2)(A)(i) 

(decline in sales or production, or both) 

and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or 

services to a foreign country) of section 

222 have not been met. 

None. 

The investigation revealed that the 

criteria under paragraphs(a)(2)(A) 

(increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift 

in production or services to a foreign 

country) of section 222 have not been 

met. 

TA–W–70,664; Signature Aluminum, 

Temroc Hamel Division, Hamel, 

MN. 

TA–W–70,715; Broan-Nutone, LLC, 

Hartford, WI. 

TA–W–70,800; MeadWestvaco 

Corporation, Consumer and Office 

Products Div., Enfield, CT. 

TA–W–70,827; FormTech Industries, 

LLC, Minerva Division, Minerva, 

OH. 

TA–W–70,861; Parkdale America, LLC, 

Plant #29, Sanford, NC. 

TA–W–70,906; Windsor Republic Door, 

Inc., Republic Doors and Frames 

Div., Manpower, Hamilton, 

McKenzie, TN. 

TA–W–71,024; Idaho Ethanol 

Processing, LLC, ED&F Man 

Biofuels, Caldwell, ID. 

TA–W–71,375; AK Steel Corporation, 

Mansfield Works Division, 

Mansfield, OH. 

TA–W–71,384; Nortech Systems, Inc., 

Aerospace Systems Division, Leased 

Workers of Doherty Staffing 

Solutions, Fairmont, MN. 

TA–W–71,954; National Envelope 

Corporation, Long Island City, NY. 

TA–W–72,039; PolyVision Corporation, 

Leased Workers of Spherion 

Company, Dixonville, PA. 

TA–W–72,205; Charles Conkle Motor 

Company, Inc., Kokomo, IN. 

TA–W–72,231; Lonza Inc., Riverside, 

Synthesis Section, Custom Mfg, Lab 

Support, Conshohocken, PA. 

TA–W–70,038; ABF Freight Systems, 

Subsidiary of Arkansas Best Corp., 

Dayton, OH. 

TA–W–70,282; J.W. Pike LTD/Vintage 

Verandah, Inc., Kalispell, MT. 

TA–W–70,743; General Motors 

Corporation, Powertrain Central, 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
3936 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 15 / Monday, January 25, 2010 / Notices 

Advanced Mechanical Engineering, 

Pontiac, MI. 

TA–W–70,872; Mars Petcare US, Inc., 

Mars Incorporated, McKenzie, TN. 

TA–W–71,835; FracTech Services, Cisco, 

TX. 

TA–W–71,918; Eberly Originals Ltd., 

Newton, NJ. 

The investigation revealed that the 

criteria under paragraphs (b)(2) and 

(b)(3) (public agency acquisition of 

services from a foreign country) of 

section 222 have not been met. 

None. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria of Section 222(c)(2) has not been 

met. The workers’ firm (or subdivision) 

is not a Supplier to or a Downstream 

Producer for a firm whose workers were 

certified as eligible to apply for TAA. 

None. 

I hereby certify that the aforementioned 

determinations were issued during the period 

of November 2 through November 13, 2009. 

Copies of these determinations are available 

for inspection in Room N–5428, U.S. 

Department of Labor, 200 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 during 

normal business hours or will be mailed to 

persons who write to the above address. 

Dated: January 13, 2010. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division Of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2010–1312 Filed 1–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Notice of Determinations Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 

U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor 

herein presents summaries of 

determinations regarding eligibility to 

apply for trade adjustment assistance for 

workers by (TA–W) number issued 

during the period of November 16 

through November 27, 2009. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for workers of 

a primary firm and a certification issued 

regarding eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(a) of the Act must be met. 

I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the 

following must be satisfied: 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) The sales or production, or both, 

of such firm have decreased absolutely; 

and 

(3) One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

(A) Imports of articles or services like 

or directly competitive with articles 

produced or services supplied by such 

firm have increased; 

(B) Imports of articles like or directly 

competitive with articles into which one 

or more component parts produced by 

such firm are directly incorporated, 

have increased; 

(C) Imports of articles directly 

incorporating one or more component 

parts produced outside the United 

States that are like or directly 

competitive with imports of articles 

incorporating one or more component 

parts produced by such firm have 

increased; 

(D) Imports of articles like or directly 

competitive with articles which are 

produced directly using services 

supplied by such firm, have increased; 

and 

(4) The increase in imports 

contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation and to the decline in the 

sales or production of such firm; or 

II. Section 222(a)(2)(B), all of the 

following must be satisfied: 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

(A) There has been a shift by the 

workers’ firm to a foreign country in the 

production of articles or supply of 

services like or directly competitive 

with those produced/supplied by the 

workers’ firm; 

(B) There has been an acquisition 

from a foreign country by the workers’ 

firm of articles/services that are like or 

directly competitive with those 

produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; 

and 

(3) The shift/acquisition contributed 

importantly to the workers’ separation 

or threat of separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected workers in public agencies and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(b) of the Act must be met. 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the public agency have 

become totally or partially separated, or 

are threatened to become totally or 

partially separated; 

(2) The public agency has acquired 

from a foreign country services like or 

directly competitive with services 

which are supplied by such agency; and 

(3) The acquisition of services 

contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected secondary workers of a firm and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(c) of the Act must be met. 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the workers’ firm have 

become totally or partially separated, or 

are threatened to become totally or 

partially separated; 

(2) The workers’ firm is a Supplier or 

Downstream Producer to a firm that 

employed a group of workers who 

received a certification of eligibility 

under Section 222(a) of the Act, and 

such supply or production is related to 

the article or service that was the basis 

for such certification; and 

(3) Either— 

(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier 

and the component parts it supplied to 

the firm described in paragraph (2) 

accounted for at least 20 percent of the 

production or sales of the workers’ firm; 

or 

(B) A loss of business by the workers’ 

firm with the firm described in 

paragraph (2) contributed importantly to 

the workers’ separation or threat of 

separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected workers in firms identified by 

the International Trade Commission and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 222(f) 

of the Act must be met. 

(1) The workers’ firm is publicly 

identified by name by the International 

Trade Commission as a member of a 

domestic industry in an investigation 

resulting in— 

(A) An affirmative determination of 

serious injury or threat thereof under 

section 202(b)(1); 

(B) An affirmative determination of 

market disruption or threat thereof 

under section 421(b)(1); or 

(C) An affirmative final determination 

of material injury or threat thereof under 

section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A)); 

(2) The petition is filed during the 

1-year period beginning on the date on 

which— 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES