alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report of Tiger
Oil and Energy, In., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Kenneth B Liebscher, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date: March 5, 2012



|/s/ Kenneth B Liebscher | 
|----------------------- | 
|Kenneth B Liebscher CEO
#### Edward C. James, Respondent, v. James Henry Work, Appellant.

— Order in respect to the two amendments stated in opinion reversed, but in all other respects affirmed, without costs to either party. Opinion

*Per CuHam.*
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5388 

To clarify the definition of nonadmitted insurer under the Nonadmitted and 

Reinsurance Reform Act of 2010, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 31, 2014 

Mr. WELCH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL 

To clarify the definition of nonadmitted insurer under the 

Nonadmitted and Reinsurance Reform Act of 2010, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Captive Insurers Clari5 fication Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CAPTIVE INSURERS. 

7 Section 527 of the Nonadmitted and Reinsurance Re8 form Act of 2010 (15 U.S.C. 8206) is amended— 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5388 IH

1 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (4) through 

2 (16) as paragraphs (5) through (17), respectively; 

3 (2) by inserting after paragraph (3) the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(4) CAPTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY.—The 

6 term ‘captive insurance company’ includes any insur7 ance company— 

8 ‘‘(A) that is wholly owned, directly or indi9 rectly, by a single parent company, and whose 

10 primary purpose is to provide insurance to 

11 cover the risks of such single parent company 

12 or any affiliates of such single parent company; 

13 ‘‘(B) that is wholly owned, directly or indi14 rectly, by a group of companies, and whose pri15 mary purpose is to provide insurance to cover 

16 the risks of such group of companies or any af17 filiates of such group of companies; and 

18 ‘‘(C) that is wholly owned, directly or indi19 rectly, by an industry, trade, or service group or 

20 association, and whose primary purpose is to 

21 provide insurance to cover the risks to any 

22 member in such group or association or any af23 filiate of such member.’’; and 

24 (3) in paragraph (12)(B), as so redesignated— 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5388 IH

1 (A) by striking ‘‘(B) does not include a 

2 risk retention group’’ and inserting the fol3 lowing: 

4 ‘‘(B) does not include— 

5 ‘‘(i) a risk retention group’’; 

6 (B) by striking the period at the end and 

7 inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

8 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(ii) a captive insurance company.’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT
32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The
undersigned, Mingchun Zhou, the Chief Executive Officer of CHINA SKYRISE
DIGITAL SERVICE INC. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1.     The
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2009
(the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement this 14th day of December,
2009.

| |                                                        | 
| | ------------------------------------------------------ | 
| | /s/ Mingchun
 Zhou                                     | 
| |                                                        | 
| | Mingchun
 Zhou                                         | 
| | Chief
 Executive Officer(Principal
 Executive Officer) | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to China Skyrise Digital Service Inc. and will be retained by
China Skyrise Digital Service Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
such filing.

---
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5306 Filed: 01/07/20 Entered: 01/08/20 12:40:13 Page 1 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5306 Filed: 01/07/20 Entered: 01/08/20 12:40:13 Page 2 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5306 Filed: 01/07/20 Entered: 01/08/20 12:40:13 Page 3 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5306 Filed: 01/07/20 Entered: 01/08/20 12:40:13 Page 4 of

4
---

CONSENT OF ROSCOE POSTLE ASSOCIATES INC.

The undersigned hereby consents to: (i) the filing of the written disclosure regarding (a) the technical report entitled “Technical Report on the Arizona Strip Uranium Project, Arizona, U.S.A.” dated June 27, 2012, (b) the technical
report entitled “Technical Report on the EZ1 and EZ2 Breccia Pipes, Arizona Strip District, U.S.A.” dated June 27, 2012, (c) the technical report entitled “Technical Report on the Henry Mountains Complex Uranium Property, Utah,
U.S.A.” dated June 27, 2012, and (d) the technical report entitled “Technical Report Update on the Roca Honda Project, McKinley County, New Mexico, U.S.A.” dated August 6, 2012, in relation to, as applicable, (A) the Form 40-F
Annual Report for the period ended December 31, 2013, and any amendments thereto (the “Form 40-F”), of Energy Fuels Inc. (the “Company”), filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, (B) the
Company’s Annual Information Form for the period ended December 31, 2013 (the “AIF”) and (C) the Management Information Circular of the Company dated July 15, 2013, and the documents incorporated by reference therein (the
“Circular”); and (ii) the incorporation by reference of such disclosure into (a) the Company’s Form S-8 Registration Statement, being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and any amendments thereto (the
“S-8”), and (b) the Company’s Form F-10 Registration Statement, being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and any amendments thereto (the “F-10”).

I also consent to: (i) the use of my name in the AIF, the Circular, the Form F-10 and the Form 40-F; (ii) the incorporation by reference of the Form 40-F, and the AIF into Form S-8; and (iii) the incorporation by reference of the Form 40-F, the AIF
and the Circular into the Form F-10.

ROSCOE POSTLE ASSOCIATES INC.

(Signed)“Deborah McCombe”
  Deborah McCombe  President & CEO

Date: March 28, 2014

|RPA Inc.55
      University Ave. Suite 501 | Toronto, ON, Canada M5J 2H7 | T+1
      (416) 947 0907 | www.rpacan.com
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------

---
#### NANNIE T. HARRISON v. ANNIE B. KAPP and THOMAS E. KAPP.

(Filed 14 January, 1955.)

Automobiles §§ 8i, 18h (2) —

■ This action was instituted to recover damages resulting from a collision at an intersection of streets in a municipality. Plaintiff’s evidence tbat slie entered tbe intersection first and tbat defendants entered tbe intersection from ber left, is sufficient to take tbe case to tbe jury over defendants’ motion to nonsuit. G.S. 20-155.

Appeal by tbe plaintiff from *Fo.untain, Special Judge,*19 July, 1954 Term, Forsyte.

Tbe plaintiff brought this action, alleging she suffered personal injuries and property damage on account of tbe actionable negligence of tbe defendants in a collision between her Ford and the Plymouth driven by tbe defendant Annie B. Kapp. The accident occurred at 11:30 a.m. on a clear day at tbe intersection of First Street and Cloverdale Avenue in tbe City of Winston-Salem.

Tbe defendants denied negligence on tbe part of Annie B. Kapp and set up a counterclaim alleging actionable negligence on tbe part of tbe plaintiff and asked for recovery for personal injury and property damage suffered by the defendants.

Tbe plaintiff’s evidence disclosed tbat West First Street runs near, east and west and tbat Cloverdale Avenue runs near north and south. There *409was an electrically operated traffic control signal light over the center of the intersection. However, at the time of the accident this light was temporarily out of working order. The plaintiff was going west on First Street, the defendants north on Cloverdale. The defendants, therefore, were to plaintiff’s left, and the plaintiff was on the defendants’ right. Mrs. Motsinger, a plaintiff’s witness, testified she saw the accident; that plaintiff eritered the intersection first, at about 15 miles per hour; that the defendants did not stop as they approached the intersection, but entered at about 20 or 25 miles per hour. The cars came to resfion the northwest corner of the intersection.

At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence, motion for judgment of nonsuit was made and sustained, and from the judgment dismissing the action the plaintiff excepted and appealed.

*Ingle, Rucker ■& Ingle for plaintiff, appellant.*

*Deal, Hutchins ■& Minor, Jyy Fred S. Hutchins, for defendants, appel-lees.*

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff’s showing that she entered the intersection first, that she was on the right and the defendants on her left, is sufficient to survive the motion for nonsuit and take the case to the jury. G-.S. 20-155. As is customary in reversing a nonsuit, we refrain from discussing the evidence, except to the extent necessary to show the reason for the conclusion reached.

Beversed.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 514 Filed: 02/20/19 Entered: 02/20/19 15:41:22 Page 1 of 4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 514 Filed: 02/20/19 Entered: 02/20/19 15:41:22 Page 2 of 4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 514 Filed: 02/20/19 Entered: 02/20/19 15:41:22 Page 3 of 4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 514 Filed: 02/20/19 Entered: 02/20/19 15:41:22 Page 4 of 4
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5146 

To designate the United States courthouse located at 700 Grant Street 

in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Joseph F. Weis Jr. United States 

Courthouse’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 17, 2014 

Mr. DOYLE (for himself and Mr. MURPHY of Pennsylvania) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 

Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To designate the United States courthouse located at 700 

Grant Street in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Joseph 

F. Weis Jr. United States Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The United States courthouse located at 700 Grant 

5 Street in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, shall be known and 

6 designated as the ‘‘Joseph F. Weis Jr. United States 

7 Courthouse’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5146 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the United 

4 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed 

5 to be a reference to the ‘‘Joseph F. Weis Jr. United States 

6 Courthouse’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Jennie Perkins Williams, an Alleged Incompetent Person, Appellant.

Motion denied, without, costs.

Present — Jenks',P. J.,’ Thomas, Carr, Woodward and Rich, JJ.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-20954

Conference Calendar

__________________

SAMUEL CITIZEN,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

GEORGE W. BUSH, Governor;

WAYNE SCOTT, Director,

Texas Department of Criminal Justice,

Institutional Division,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. CA H 95-4441

- - - - - - - - - -

August 22, 1996

Before KING, DUHÉ, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Texas prisoner Samuel Citizen, # 664839, appeals the

district court's dismissal of his complaint seeking injunctive

and monetary relief based on the implementation of an allegedly

unconstitutional bill enacted by the Texas Legislature. Because

Citizen alleges no actual injury, he lacks standing to invoke
No. 95-20954

-2-

federal jurisdiction. See Lewis v. Casey, 116 S. Ct. 2174, 2179-

80 & n.1 (1996); Society of Separationists, Inc. v. Herman, 959 

F.2d 1283, 1285 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 113 S. Ct.

191 (1992).

APPEAL DISMISSED.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Derycz Scientific, Inc.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alan Urban, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Alan Urban                                                       | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Alan Urban                                                           | 
|Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) | 
|September 28, 2012                                                   |
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 5351-1 Filed: 01/13/20 Entered: 01/13/20 11:32:53 Page 1

of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - 14 CFR Part 71
          - [Docket No. FAA-2009-0653; Airspace Docket 09-ASO-22]

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

# SUMMARY:

                        This action confirms the effective date of a direct final rule published in the                         **Federal Register**                         October 28, 2009 that modifies the Class E airspace at Anniston Metropolitan Airport, Anniston, AL.                    

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         0901 UTC, January 27, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Melinda Giddens, Operations Support, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O. Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404) 305-5610.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Confirmation of Effective Date

                    The FAA published this direct final rule with a request for comments in the                     **Federal Register**                     on October 28, 2009 (74 FR 55449), Docket No. FAA-2009-0653; Airspace Docket 09-ASO-22. The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would become effective on December 17, 2009. No adverse comments were received, and thus this notice confirms that effective date.                

Issued in College Park, Georgia on January 13, 2010.

Barry A. Knight,

Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic Organization.

[FR Doc. 2010-1374 Filed 1-26-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 26, 2021 t0323

Order 

Clerk

March 26, 2021

161348 & (49)(50)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 161348

COA: 346885

Chippewa CC: 18-003454-FH

KENNETH THOMAS McCLELLAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion to withdraw the application for leave to appeal 

is GRANTED, and the application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and 

without costs.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Justina L. Glowinski, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[772 NYS2d 639]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 28, 2003, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was discharged from her employment for excessive absenteeism and failure to call in her absences. Prior to her termination, claimant advised the employer of her desire to spend time with her sick mother and inquired about taking a leave of absence. Although not approved for such leave, claimant failed to report to work for several days and failed to comply with the employer’s call-in policy which prohibited more than two unreported absences a year.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant lost her employment due to disqualifying misconduct. An unauthorized absence from work *(see Matter of Jacque [Commissioner of Labor],*270 *840AD2d 541 [2000]; *Matter of Burns [Commissioner of Labor],*259 AD2d 797 [1999]; *Matter of Polax [New York City Dept. of Correction—Sweeney],*220 AD2d 919 [1995]) or a failure to abide by an employer’s call-in policy can constitute disqualifying misconduct *(see Matter of Jimenez [Commissioner of Labor],*301 AD2d 716, 716-717 [2003]; *Matter of Lyubinskaya [Daffy’s, Inc.—Commissioner of Labor],*288 AD2d 551, 552 [2001]). Claimant’s remaining contention, that she was automatically entitled to a determination in her favor because the employer failed to appear at the hearing, has been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Peters, J.P., Spain, Carpinello, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5331 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5331

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 18, 2014

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 73839 Gorgonio Drive in Twentynine Palms, California, as the 
        ``Colonel M.J. `Mac' Dube, USMC Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COLONEL M.J. ``MAC'' DUBE, USMC POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 73839 Gorgonio Drive in Twentynine Palms, California, shall 
be known and designated as the ``Colonel M.J. `Mac' Dube, USMC Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Colonel 
M.J. `Mac' Dube, USMC Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 17, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CHRI STOPHER EDWARD CHRISTLIEB , A ppellant ,
v. Case No. 5D 21

- 3211 LT Case No. 21

- CF

- 000335

- A STATE O F FLORIDA ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Decision filed November 1, 2022 Appeal from t he C ircuit C ourt for C itrus County , Richard A

. H oward, J udge. Matthew J. Metz , P ublic D efender, an d Betty W yatt, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona B each, for

A ppellant. Ashley M oody, A ttorney G eneral, Tallahassee, an d Kristin L. D avenport, Assistant A ttorney G eneral, D aytona Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED.

WALLIS , EISNAUGLE and HARRIS , JJ. , concur.