alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                     $   439,459
<SECURITIES>                                 5,153,303
<RECEIVABLES>                                  552,783
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,238,235
<PP&E>                                      80,034,034
<DEPRECIATION>                              21,933,643
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              68,899,468
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,146,569
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,776,501
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                68,899,468
<SALES>                                     14,681,709
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,813,174
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,146,970
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,623,619
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,787,851
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,787,851
<EPS-BASIC>                                      16.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    16.09


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION

-andPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY,

Debtors.

Case No, 19-30088 (DM)

Chapter 11

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

TRANSFER OF CLAIM OTHER THAN FOR SECURITY

A CLAIM HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS CASE or deemed filed under 11 U.S.C. §1111 (a). Transferee hereby gives notice 

pursuant to Rule 3001(e) (2), Fed. R. Bankr. P., of the transfer, other than for security, of the claim referenced in this notice.

CONTRARIAN FUNDS, LLC

Name of Transferee

Address for all Communications/Notices:

CONTRARIAN FUNDS, LLC

411 WEST PUTNAM AVE., SUITE 425

GREENWICH, CT 06830

ATTN: ALISA MUMOLA

Phone: 203-862-8211

Fax: 203-485-5910

Email: tradeclaimsgroup@contrariancapital.com

Address for all Payments/Distributions:

CONTRARIAN FUNDS, LLC

ATTN: 392426

500 ROSS ST 154-0455

PITTSBURGH, PA 15262

N CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 

Name of Transferor

Name and Current Address of Transferor:

N CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 

220 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE, STE 11-262

NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660

ATTN: ANDREW DAVIES

I declare under penalty of perjury that the information provided in this notice

is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

By:_______/s/ Alisa Mumola_________

 Transferee/Transferee’s Agent

Date: August 20, 2019

Penalty for making a false statement: Fine of up to $500,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years, or both. 18 U.S.C. §§ 152 & 3571.

Schedule/Claim No. Creditor Name Amount Debtor Case No.

Schedule F N Consulting Engineers, Inc. $68,010.00 Pacific Gas and Electric Company 19-30089

Claim No. 2032 N Consulting Engineers, Inc. $72,329.17 Pacific Gas and Electric Company 19-30089

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3603 Filed: 08/20/19 Entered: 08/20/19 06:51:45 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3603 Filed: 08/20/19 Entered: 08/20/19 06:51:45 Page 2 of

2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Election Assistance Commission

# AGENCY:

U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting for EAC Board of Advisors.

# DATE AND TIME: 

Wednesday, June 16, 2010, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. and

Thursday, June 17, 2010, 9 a.m.-5:30 p.m. and

Friday, June 18, 2010, 9 a.m.-12 Noon.

# PLACE:

 Phoenix Park Hotel, 520 North Capitol Street, NW., Washington, DC 20001, phone number (202) 638-6900.

# PURPOSE:

 The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) Board of Advisors, as required by the Help America Vote Act of 2002, will meet to receive updates on EAC program activities. The Board will receive updates on Voting System Testing and Certification programs, including UOCAVA Pilot Program Voting Systems. The Board will receive a presentation by the National Institute of Standards and Technology on UOCAVA Voting Systems Threat Analysis. The Board will receive updates on research and studies, including draft election management guidelines: chapters on Technology in Elections, Elections Office Administration and Accessibility. The Board will receive an update on an EAC Clearinghouse. The Board will receive updates on the EAC Grants programs. The Board will hear committee reports, elect officers and consider other administrative matters.

Members of the public may observe but not participate in EAC meetings unless this notice provides otherwise. Members of the public may use small electronic audio recording devices to record the proceedings. The use of other recording equipment and cameras requires advance notice to and coordination with the EAC's Communications Office.*

* View EAC Regulations Implementing Government in the Sunshine Act.

This meeting will be open to the public.

# PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:

 Bryan Whitener, telephone: (202) 566-3100.

Gracia M. Hillman,

Commissioner, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

[FR Doc. 2010-13114 Filed 5-27-10; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-KF-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EXHIBIT B 

COMPENSATION BY WORK TASK CODE FOR 

SERVICES RENDERED BY CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP 

FOR THE PERIOD JULY 1, 2019 THROUGH JULY 31, 2019 

TASK 

CODE DESCRIPTION HOURS AMOUNT 

ADMN Case Administration (Incl. Docket Updates and Case Calendar) 228.20 $69,226.50 

AUTO Automatic Stay 71.20 59,973.50 

BARN Bar Date and Claims Noticing Matter 13.90 12,250.50 

CASE General Case Strategy 297.80 239,490.50 

CASH Financing / Cash Collateral 3.30 4,222.00 

COMM Committee Matters 386.40 264,867.50 

CRAV Cravath Retention and Fee Application 534.50 291,816.50 

CRED Creditor Inquiries 0.50 470.00 

DSSV Disclosure Statement / Solicitation / Voting Matters 2.50 2,526.00 

FEEO Retention and Fee Application of Non-Cravath Professionals 3.40 4,647.50 

GOVR Corporate Governance and Securities Matters 356.50 336,322.00 

HEAR Hearings and Court Matters 22.00 22,482.50 

INVS Investigations 396.00 264,467.00 

NONB Non-Bankruptcy Litigation 4,848.70 2,548,508.00 

OCMS Other Contested Matters 1.70 2,072.00 

OPRS Business Operations Matters 163.30 118,919.50 

PLAN Plan of Reorganization / Plan Confirmation 22.50 25,959.00

PUBL Public Relations Strategy 10.40 9,440.00 

REGS Regulatory & Legislative Matters 2,085.60 1,448,466.50 

TRVL Non-Working Travel Time 280.80 100,791.00* 

USTM U.S. Trustee Matters / Meetings / Communications / Reports 5.60 3,081.00 

WILD Wildfire Claims Matters 2,789.70 1,958,618.50 

TOTAL 12,524.50 $7,788,617.50** 

* - Non-Working Travel Time billed at 50% discount. 

** - Net of $123,928.50 in voluntary write offs. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4539-2 Filed: 10/31/19 Entered: 10/31/19 15:39:37 Page 1

of 1
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LORNA M. RESULTAY,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-72894

Agency No. A071-782-793

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 8, 2012** 

Before: ALARCÓN, BERZON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

Lorna M. Resultay, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal

from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying her motion to reopen deportation

proceedings conducted in absentia. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. 

FILED

AUG 13 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-72894

We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and review de

novo questions of law. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir.

2005). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Resultay’s motion to reopen

on the ground that she failed to establish reasonable cause for her absence at her

deportation hearing where the record shows the calendar was set in her presence

and she does not dispute that both she and her counsel were personally served

notice of the hearing. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b) (1991) (repealed) (petitioner must

establish “reasonable cause” for failure to appear); Hernandez-Vivas v. INS, 23

F.3d 1557, 1559-60 (9th Cir. 1994) (no reasonable cause for absence where

petitioner was aware new hearing date was scheduled but failed to appear).

Resultay’s contention that the IJ should have construed her motion to reopen

more permissively is unpersuasive. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3471    Filed: 08/08/19    Entered: 08/08/19 14:50:16    Page 1 of11

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3471    Filed: 08/08/19    Entered: 08/08/19 14:50:16    Page 2 of11

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3471    Filed: 08/08/19    Entered: 08/08/19 14:50:16    Page 3 of11

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3471    Filed: 08/08/19    Entered: 08/08/19 14:50:16    Page 4 of11

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3471    Filed: 08/08/19    Entered: 08/08/19 14:50:16    Page 5 of11

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3471    Filed: 08/08/19    Entered: 08/08/19 14:50:16    Page 6 of11

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3471    Filed: 08/08/19    Entered: 08/08/19 14:50:16    Page 7 of11

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3471    Filed: 08/08/19    Entered: 08/08/19 14:50:16    Page 8 of11

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3471    Filed: 08/08/19    Entered: 08/08/19 14:50:16    Page 9 of11

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3471    Filed: 08/08/19    Entered: 08/08/19 14:50:16    Page 10of 11

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3471    Filed: 08/08/19    Entered: 08/08/19 14:50:16    Page 11of 11
EXHIBIT 11

               INTERCELL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
                        COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE
              For the Three Months Ended December 31, 2003 and 2002
                                   (Unaudited)


                                                2003         2002
                                                ----         ----

               Net loss                     $  (110,168)    (26,422)
                                            ============  ==========

               Weighted average number of
                 common shares outstanding   17,386,004   8,651,251
               Common equivalent shares
                 representing shares
                 issuable upon exercise of
                 outstanding options and
                 warrants and convertible
                 stock                                -           -
                                            ------------  ----------
                                             17,386,004   8,651,251
                                            ============  ==========
               Basic and diluted loss per
                 share applicable to
                 common shareholders        $         *           *
                                            ============  ==========



* Less than ($0.01) per share.

Stock  options,  warrants  and convertible preferred stock are not considered in
the  calculations  for  those  periods  with  net  losses  as  the impact of the
potential  common  shares  (approximately  9,713,850  at  December  31, 2003 and
338,850  shares  at  December 31, 2002) would be to decrease net loss per share.



<PAGE>
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3663    Filed: 08/22/19    Entered: 08/22/19 13:52:41    Page 1 of2

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3663    Filed: 08/22/19    Entered: 08/22/19 13:52:41    Page 2 of2
#### Leo Goldmark, Respondent, v. The Metropolitan Opera House Company, Appellant.

— Order reversed with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion to suppress the commission granted with ten dollars costs. Opinion

*Per CuHam.*
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A second amended of Lightlake Therapeutics Inc. (the"Company") for the year ended July 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Dr. Roger Crystal, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: May 11, 2010
 By: /s/ Dr. Roger Crystal
 Dr. Roger Crystal
 Chief Executive Officer








This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION and PACIFIC GAS 

AND ELECTRIC COMPANY,

 Debtors 

Chapter 11 

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

(Jointly Administered) 

TRANSFER OF CLAIM OTHER THAN FOR SECURITY 

A CLAIM HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS CASE or deemed filed under 11 U.S.C. § 1111(a). 

Transferee hereby gives evidence and notice pursuant to Rule 3001(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of 

Bankruptcy Procedure of the transfer, other than for security, of the claim referenced in this 

evidence and notice. 

Crawford & Company Cherokee Debt Acquisition, LLC 

Name of Transferor Name of Transferee

Claim No: 3408

Debtor: PG&E Corporation 

(19-30088) 

Claim Amount: $70,048.90 

Name and Address where notices and payments 

to transferee should be sent: 

Cherokee Debt Acquisition, LLC 

1325 Avenue of the Americas, 28th Floor 

New York, NY 10019 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the information provided in this notice is true and correct 

to the best of my knowledge and belief. 

By: _____________________ Date: , 2019 

Transferee/Transferee’s Agent

Penalty for making a false statement: Fine of up to $500,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years, 

or both. 18 U.S.C. §§ 152 & 3571. 

June 25

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2751 Filed: 06/25/19 Entered: 06/25/19 12:39:21 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2751 Filed: 06/25/19 Entered: 06/25/19 12:39:21 Page 2 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2697 Filed: 06/20/19 Entered: 06/21/19 08:12:32 Page 1 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2697 Filed: 06/20/19 Entered: 06/21/19 08:12:32 Page 2 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2697 Filed: 06/20/19 Entered: 06/21/19 08:12:32 Page 3 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2697 Filed: 06/20/19 Entered: 06/21/19 08:12:32 Page 4 of

4
- 257 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

308 Nebraska Reports

DICK v. KOSKI PROF. GROUP

Cite as 308 Neb. 257

Robert Dick, appellee and cross-appellant, v. Koski 

Professional Group, P.C., third-party plaintiff, 

appellant and cross-appellee, and Bland & 

Associates, P.C., third-party defendant, 

appellee and cross-appellant.

___ N.W.2d ___

Filed January 29, 2021. No. S-19-132.

supplemental opinion

Appeal from the District Court for Douglas County: J 

Russell Derr, Judge. Former opinion modified. Motion for 

rehearing overruled.

Robert M. Slovek and Dwyer Arce, of Kutak Rock, L.L.P., 

for appellant.

Aaron A. Clark, Ruth A. Horvatich, and Cody E. 

Brookhouser-Sisney, of McGrath, North, Mullin & Kratz, P.C., 

L.L.O., for appellee Robert Dick.

Ryan M. Kunhart and Jeffrey J. Blumel, of Dvorak Law 

Group, L.L.C., for appellee Bland & Associates, P.C.

Heavican, C.J., Cassel, Stacy, Funke, Papik, and 

Freudenberg, JJ.

Per Curiam.

This case is before us on a motion for rehearing filed 

by the appellant, Koski Professional Group, P.C. (KPG), 

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library

www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/

04/02/2021 08:09 AM CDT
- 258 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

308 Nebraska Reports

DICK v. KOSKI PROF. GROUP

Cite as 308 Neb. 257

concerning our opinion in Dick v. Koski Prof. Group, 307 Neb. 

599, 950 N.W.2d 321 (2020).

We find no substantive merit to KPG’s motion and overrule 

it, but modify the opinion as follows:

(1) In the background section, under the subheading 

“Peremptory Challenges,” we withdraw the last sentence of 

the sole paragraph and substitute the following: “Other than a 

marked copy of a jury roster included in a supplemental transcript, the jury selection process is not otherwise reflected in 

the appellate record.”

(2) In the analysis section, under the subheading “Peremptory 

Challenges (Assignment of Error No. 1),” we withdraw the 

seventh paragraph and substitute the following:

We do not decide that question here. While KPG has 

offered a marked copy of a jury roster in a supplemental 

transcript, the markings on that roster do not match the 

roster’s legend sufficiently to support KPG’s claim that 

it exhausted all its peremptory challenges. As such, the 

record is insufficient to support its assignment of error 

even if we found merit to KPG’s legal premise.

The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified.

Former opinion modified.

Motion for rehearing overruled.

Miller-Lerman, J., not participating.
Exhibit 34.4.2

[Letterhead of Ernst & Young LLP]



Ernst & Young LLP901 E. Cary Street, Suite 1000Richmond, VA 23219


Phone: (804) 344-6000

www.ey.com

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Board of Directors

SunTrust Bank

We have examined managements assertion included in the accompanying report of Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that SunTrust
Bank (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(4)(i), and 1122(d)(4)(ii) of the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB for the residential mortgage loan servicing
platform of SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007. Refer to managements assertion for the asset backed transactions covered by this platform. Management is responsible for the Companys compliance
with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assertion about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset backed transactions and securities that compromise the platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform,
and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing
activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts
calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a
legal determination on the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements assertion that the Company complied
with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007 for the residential mortgage loan servicing platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.



|                     
|---------------------
|/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|                     
|March 6, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 104 (Tuesday, June 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 30417]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13020]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1900-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2010-0002]


Minnesota; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Minnesota (FEMA-1900-DR), dated April 19, 2010, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: April 26, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Recovery Directorate, 
Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this disaster is closed effective April 26, 2010.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2010-13020 Filed 5-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P