alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DIEMER & WEI, LLP

Kathryn S. Diemer (#133977)

100 West San Fernando Street, Suite 555

San Jose, CA 95113

Telephone: 408-971-6270 

Facsimile: 408-971-6271 

Email: kdiemer@diemerwei.com

-andWILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER LLP

Matthew A. Feldman (pro hac vice)

Joseph G. Minias (pro hac vice)

787 Seventh Avenue

New York, NY 10019-6099

Telephone: (212) 728-8000

Facsimile: (212) 728-8111

Email: mfeldman@willkie.com

jminias@willkie.com

Counsel for Ad Hoc Group of Subrogation Claim Holders

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION,

-andPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, 

Debtors.

☐ Affects PG&E Corporation

☐ Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company

 Affects both Debtors

* All papers shall be filed in the lead case,

No. 19-30088 (DM)

Chapter 11 

Bankr. Case No. 19-30088 (DM)

(Jointly Administered)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2960 Filed: 07/12/19 Entered: 07/12/19 16:28:33 Page 1 of

2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

I, Nicola Rowbottom, do declare and state as follows:

1. I am employed in Santa Clara County in the State of California. I am more than 

eighteen years old and not a party to this action. My business address is Diemer & 

Wei LLP, 100 W. San Fernando St. Suite 555, San Jose, CA, 95113. 

2. I certify that on July 12, 2019, I caused a true and correct copy of each of the 

following documents to be served via email on the Standard Party Email Service 

List attached hereto as Exhibit A: 

a. Joinder of Amica Mutual Insurance Company, BG Resolution 

Partners I-A, L.L.C (An Affiliate of the Baupost Group L.L.C.), 

Encompass Insurance Company, Fire Insurance Exchange, Hartford 

Accident and Indemnity Company, Liberty Insurance Corporation, 

Mercury Insurance, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, and 

United Services Automobile Association to Motion of the Ad Hoc 

Group of Subrogation Claim Holders for Relief From the Automatic 

Stay 

3. I certify that on July 12, 2019, I caused a true and correct copy of each of the 

above documents to be served via First Class Mail on the Standard Party First 

Class Mail Service List attached hereto as Exhibit B. 

4. I certify that on July 12, 2019, I caused a true and correct copy of each of the 

above documents to be served via Email on the Core/2002 Email Service List 

attached hereto as Exhibit C.

5. I certify that on July 12, 2019, I caused a true and correct copy of each of the 

above documents to be served via First Class Mail on the Core/2002 Hardcopy 

First Class Service List attached hereto as Exhibit D.

6. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America, 

that the foregoing is true and correct and that if called upon as a witness, I could 

and would testify thereto.

Executed on July 12, 2019, 

____/s/ Nicola Strachan_____

Nicola Strachan

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2960 Filed: 07/12/19 Entered: 07/12/19 16:28:33 Page 2 of

2
No. 18,005 and No. 18,006.

#### Continental Casualty Company, et al, *v.*Industrial Commission, et al.

(304 P. [2d] 628)

Decided December 10, 1956.

Rehearing denied December 24, 1956.

Messrs. Wood and Ris, for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Paul C. Brown, for defendant in error Charles E. Tucker.

*394Mr. Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General, Mr. Frank E. Hickey, Deputy, Mr. Peter L. Dye, Assistant, for Industrial Commission of Colorado.

Mr. Harold Clark Thompson, Mr. Louis Schiff, Mr. Alious Rockett, for State Compensation Insurance Fund.

*En Banc.*

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed without written opinion.
#### Michael Martin, General Guardian, etc., Respondent, v. New York, New Haven and Hartford Railway Company, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153-0119

 

EXHIBIT A 

Stipulation 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3874-1 Filed: 09/11/19 Entered: 09/11/19 10:08:43 Page 1

 of 5

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4132-1 Filed: 10/04/19 Entered: 10/04/19 13:21:27 Page 1

of 5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4132-1 Filed: 10/04/19 Entered: 10/04/19 13:21:27 Page 2

of 5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4132-1 Filed: 10/04/19 Entered: 10/04/19 13:21:27 Page 3

of 5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4132-1 Filed: 10/04/19 Entered: 10/04/19 13:21:27 Page 4

of 5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4132-1 Filed: 10/04/19 Entered: 10/04/19 13:21:27 Page 5

of 5
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3364    Filed: 08/02/19    Entered: 08/02/19 16:02:41    Page 1 of3

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3364    Filed: 08/02/19    Entered: 08/02/19 16:02:41    Page 2 of3

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3364    Filed: 08/02/19    Entered: 08/02/19 16:02:41    Page 3 of3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          27,802
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             247
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 5,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    108,681
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          14,413
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            14,503
<LOANS>                                        624,879
<ALLOWANCE>                                      8,356
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 799,676
<DEPOSITS>                                     592,851
<SHORT-TERM>                                    66,347
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,678
<LONG-TERM>                                     61,406
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,809
<OTHER-SE>                                      66,585
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 799,676
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 13,333
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,865
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   180
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                15,378
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,463
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,244
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            8,134
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      675
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,630
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,385
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,385
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,233
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .38
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.37
<LOANS-NON>                                        719
<LOANS-PAST>                                       129
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   392
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    818
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 8,335
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      910
<RECOVERIES>                                       256
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                8,356
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             5,772
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          2,584
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Application of Thomas O. Peirce for Admission to the Bar.

Application granted.

Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Woodward and Rich, JJ.
<PAGE>


Exhibit 32.1


    CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Michael P. DiMino, President and Chief Executive Officer, of LESCO, Inc. (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended
          September 30, 2003 which this certification accompanies fully complies
          with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
          Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




November 13, 2003                        /s/ Michael P. DiMino
                                         ---------------------
                                         Michael P. DiMino
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
23.4













CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS








We hereby
consent to the use of our name and to its report dated February 9, 2010,
relating to proved oil and natural gas reserves and future net revenues of
Vanguard Natural Resources, LLC for the year ended December 31, 2009, in this
Annual Report of Vanguard Natural Resources, LLC on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of said report in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No.
333-159911) and Form S-8 (No. 333-152448).








/s/
DeGolyer and MacNaughton





Dallas,
Texas


March 5,
2010
Fourth Department,

February Term, 1893.

#### Arthur S. Grout, Respondent, v. John B. Cottrell, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Hardin, P. J.
EX-34 (e)

(logo) Crowe
Crowe Chizek and Company LLC
Member Horwath International

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Audit Committee
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
West Palm Beach, Florida

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying report,
that Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC (the Company) complied with the servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission's Regulation AB for the Residential Mortgage Loans Platform (the
"Platform") as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, excluding criteria
1122(1)(iii) and 1122(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable
to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform. The
Platform consists of the asset-backed transactions and securities defined by
management in Appendix B of Management's Report. Management is responsible for
the Company's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards established by
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria for the Platform and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination
included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities constituting
the Platform and evaluating whether the Company performed servicing activities
related to those transactions and securities in compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria for the period covered by this report. Accordingly, our
testing may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed
transaction or security constituting the Platform. Further, our examination was
not designed to detect material noncompliance that may have occurred prior to
the period covered by this report and that may have affected the Company's
servicing activities during the period covered by this report. We believe that
our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination
does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion referred to above is fairly stated, in
all material respects, based on the aforementioned applicable servicing
criteria.


/s/ Crowe Chizek and Company LLC
Crowe Chizek and Company LLC


Fort Lauderdale, Florida
March 8, 2007
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 240 Filed: 02/01/19 Entered: 02/01/19 13:44:25 Page 1 of 2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 240 Filed: 02/01/19 Entered: 02/01/19 13:44:25 Page 2 of 2
B 210 A (Form 210 A) (12/ )

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

__________ District Of __________

In re ________________________________, Case No. ________________

TRANSFER OF CLAIM OTHER THAN FOR SECURITY

A CLAIM HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS CASE or deemed filed under 11 U.S.C. § 1111(a). Transferee

hereby gives evidence and notice pursuant to Rule 3001(e)(2), Fed. R. Bankr. P., of the transfer, other

than for security, of the claim referenced in this evidence and notice.

______________________________________ ____________________________________

Name of Transferee Name of Transferor

Name and Address where notices to transferee Court Claim # (if known):

should be sent: Amount of Claim:

Date Claim Filed:

Phone: ______________________________ Phone:

Last Four Digits of Acct #: ______________ Last Four Digits of Acct. #: __________

Name and Address where transferee payments

should be sent (if different from above): 

Phone:

Last Four Digits of Acct #:

I declare under penalty of perjury that the information provided in this notice is true and correct to the

best of my knowledge and belief.

By:__________________________________ Date:____________________________

Transferee/Transferee’s Agent

Penalty for making a false statement: Fine of up to $500,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years, or both. 18 U.S.C. §§ 152 & 3571.

 Northern District of California

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2755 Filed: 06/25/19 Entered: 06/25/19 13:39:45 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2755 Filed: 06/25/19 Entered: 06/25/19 13:39:45 Page 2 of

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                 5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Partnership's audited financial statements for the year ended September 30, 1995
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-30-1995
<CASH>                                         2,424
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      0
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,424
<PP&E>                                         6,565
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8,989
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             18
<BONDS>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                     8,971
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   8,989
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 316
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     97
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  219
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              219
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                     219
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   3.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   3.61
        

</TABLE>
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2322    Filed: 05/31/19    Entered: 05/31/19 15:16:23    Page 1 of2

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2322    Filed: 05/31/19    Entered: 05/31/19 15:16:23    Page 2 of2
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 0 A0 44 8 . J EROME CLARKE v . THE STATE.

In 1 9 8 1

, J e r o m e C l ark e p l ed g ui l t y to m al ice m u rd er. Years l at er, h e fi l ed a

req u es t t o p ro ceed i n fo rm a p au p eri s an d a “ m o t i o n t o req u es t t o en t ert ai n t h e m eri t s

fo r au t refo i s acq u i t .” Th e t ri al co u rt d en i ed t h e m o t i on s

, an d Cl ark e fi l ed t hi s d i rect

ap p eal

.

Un d er o u r Co ns t it u t i o n

, t h e Su p r e m e Co u rt h as ap p el l at e ju ri s d ict i o n o v er

“ [a] l l cas es i n w h i ch a sen ten ce o f d eat h was i m p o sed o r co ul d b e i m

p o s ed .” See Ga.

Co n s t

. o f 1 9 8 3

, Art

. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (8 ). Becau s e a p en al t y o f d eat h can b e

i m p o s ed fo r t h e cr i m e o f m u r der, ju ri s d i ct i on i s p ro per i n t h e Su p rem e Co u rt

. See

OCGA § 1 7 -1 0 -3 0 (b ); Nea l v. S t a t e

, 29 0 G a. 5 6 3

, 5 7 2 (7 22 SE2 d 7 6 5 ) (2 0 1 2 )

(Hu ns t ei n

, C. J

., co n cu rri n g ); s ee al s o S ta te v. Th or n to n , 2 5 3 Ga. 5 2 4 , 5 2 4 (1 ) (3 2 2

SE2 d 71 1 ) (1 9 84 ) (d i r e ct i n g t h i s Co u rt t o t ran s fer “ al l cas es i n w h i ch ei t h er a

s en t en c e o f d eat h o r o f li fe i m p ri s o n m en t h as b een i m

p o s ed u po n co n v ict i o n o f

m u rd er”). Th e Su prem e Co u rt ’ s ju ri s d i ct i o n o v er m urd er cas es i ncl u d es ap p eal s fro m

o rd ers res o l v i n g p o s t -ju d g m en t m o t i o n s in s u ch cas es

. See S imp s o n v. S t a t e

, 2 9 2 Ga.

7 6 4 (7 4 0 SE2 d 1 2 4 ) (2 01 3 ) (ap p eal fro m d en i al o f m o t io n at t a c k i n g m u rd er

co n vi ct i o n s as v o i d ). October 03, 2019Acco rd i n g l y

, t h is cas e i s h ereb y T RANSFERRED t o t h e Su p rem e Co u rt fo r

d i s p o s i t i on

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 10/03/2019
##### 



Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATION
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly
report (the Evaluation Date); andc)
    
    presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for
the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
controls; and
  May 12, 2006
 /s/ C. R. CloutierChief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6277
TROY R. SUTTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE; RICHARD W. FLEENOR, Postmaster, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-125-2) Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 16, 1997 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Troy R. Sutton, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). 2 PER CURIAM: Appellant, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his Bivens * action under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Sutton v. United States Postal Serv. , No. CA-97-125-2 (E.D. Va. Feb. 18, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. 1 United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41478 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. JESSICA GARAY Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:06-CR-158-ALL Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE, and GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jessi ca Garay appeals the sentence imposed following her guilty plea to transportation of undocumented aliens. She argues that her sentence is unreasonable as a matter of law because our post-Booker1 rul ings have effectively reinstated the mandatory sentencing guidelines regime. Garay correctly concedes that this claim is foreclosed by our precedent and raises it United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December 12, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 06-41478

2 only to preserve its further review by the Supreme Court. S ee Rita v. United States, 127 S. Ct. 2456, 2462-66 (2007); United States v. Alonzo, 435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th Cir. 2006). AFFIRMED.
#### George Slicovich, Respondent, v. William Ruger and others, Appellants. Same v. Same.

Orders affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements in one case.
#### Sarah M. Judd, Appellant, v. Mary E. Burrell and others, Respondents.

— Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event.

Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.;

Dykman, J., dissenting.
#### John P. Magovern, Appellant, v. Evolin B. Robertson and others, Respondents.

Judgment affirmed.
#### Arnold Lustig, Appellant, v. Elias Springarn, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by

Brady, J.
exv4w4w2






Exhibit 4.4.2




	 	 	 
	 

	 	AMENDMENT NO. 1
	 
	 	 
	HANOVER CAPITAL MORTGAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
	 	 
	1999 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	Adopted

	 	APPROVAL DATE: 4/15/09
	Effective as of

	 	 







AMENDMENT



Article 5.1 of the Hanover Capital Mortgage Holdings, Inc. 1999 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”)
shall be amended, effective as the date the Stockholders approve this amendment, to read in its
entirety as follows:





Article 5.1    Number of Shares Under Plan.    Subject to Section 8.12, Awards may
be granted under the Plan in respect of up to 3,000,000 of the shares. Shares issued
under the Plan may consist in whole or in part of the authorized but unissued Shares
or Treasury Shares.