alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 105 (Wednesday, June 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 30831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13284]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than June 25, 2010.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (E. Ann Worthy, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Steele Holdings, Inc., Tyler, Texas, to become a bank holding 
company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of American State 
Bank, Arp, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 28, 2010.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-13284 Filed 6-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
EXHIBIT B

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4596-2 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 12:26:16 Page 1

of 2
EXHIBIT B

COMPENSATION BY WORK TASK CODE 

FOR THE PERIOD AUGUST 1, 2019 THROUGH AUGUST 31, 2019

Task Total Total

Code Hours Fees

3 Financial Analysis (Requested by Counsel, or Otherwise) 151.5 $ 95,842.50

4 13-Week Cash Flow / MOR / Liquidity Analysis 53.3 38,233.50

5 Due Diligence of Debtor's Assets and Liabilities 33.1 21,284.50

6 Due Diligence of Wildfire Safety Plan and Related Analysis 191.7 144,491.50

7 Debtor Professionals - Diligence / Meetings / Calls 18.8 16,426.00

9 Other Professionals / Interested Parties - Diligence / Meetings / Calls 12.0 13,960.00

10 Tort Claimants (Counsel/FA) - Diligence / Meetings / Calls 46.0 50,430.00

11 Assist Counsel in Responses / Objections to Bankruptcy Court Motions 40.6 30,277.00

12 Committee Related Matters - Diligence / Meetings / Calls 90.9 93,595.50

13 Bankruptcy Filings, Motions and Other Document Review 119.3 78,668.75

14 Review of Executory Contracts and Related Analysis 26.4 18,788.00

15 Review of Employee-Related Matters, Including Retention Plans 39.6 28,372.00

16 Review of Claims and Related Analysis 110.1 84,879.50

17 Asset Sale(s), Strategic Alternatives, and Related Analysis 33.2 30,164.00

19 Analysis of Pro-Forma Capital Structure, and Related Analysis 49.4 35,483.00

20 Benchmarking and Related Analysis 103.6 60,142.00

21 Term Sheets, Plan, and Disclosure Statement Analysis 298.5 242,037.50

23 Deposition(s), Testimony, Court Hearing(s), and Related Preparation / Attendance 79.7 74,391.50

24 Business Plan 1.5 1,742.50

25 Regulatory and Legislative Matters, and Related Financial Analysis 263.3 178,843.50

26 Travel Time - Non Working Travel 29.0 31,255.00

27 Project Administration 50.9 34,155.50

29 Time and Expenses Tracking - -

31 Fee Application Preparation 90.2 52,609.00

Subtotal 1,932.6 1,456,072.25

Less: 50% Discount for Non-Working Travel Time (15,627.50)

Grand Total 1,932.6 $ 1,440,444.75

Task Description

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4596-2 Filed: 11/07/19 Entered: 11/07/19 12:26:16 Page 2

of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOHN A. VOS, ESQ. (#80790)

1430 Lincoln Avenue

San Rafael, CA 94901

(415) 485-5330

For Interested party

JOHN A. VOS

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In re: ) No: 19-30088 DM 

PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, Debtor ) 

______________________________________________________) 

 

REQUEST FOR NOTICE

The undersigned requests notice of all proceedings in this case, and that he be added 

to the mailing matrix effective immediately.

.

Dated: January 29, 2019 Respectfully submitted,

__/s/_________________

John A. Vos, Esq.

Counsel for Vos

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 43 Filed: 01/29/19 Entered: 01/29/19 09:57:49 Page 1 of 1
ex10-1.htm


    


    Exhibit
10.1

    


    Supplement
Agreement on Acquisition Payment

    (English
Translation)

    


    Party A:
Home System Group

    


    Party B:
Liming Jiao, Xiaohong Chen

    


    


    On
October 1, 2008, Party A acquired Asia Forever Investment Limited and
its wholly owned subsidiary, Zhongshan City Weihe Appliances Co., Ltd. The
total purchase price was 270 million RMB, which would be divided into four
installments over two years. In September 2008, Party A paid 55 million RMB to
Party B; and according to the original purchase agreement and disclosed
information, Party A has to pay party B totaling 80 million RMB by the end of
June 2009. After negotiation, both parties have agreed:

    


    
      	
               
      

            	
              1.

            	
              The
      cash payment part.  The total cash payment is 40 million RMB,
      which 10 million RMB was paid in April, 2009 and it came from the accounts
      receivable collection from Wei’er Industrial Ltd.; 20 million RMB was paid
      in June and it came from the accounts receivable collection from Wei’er
      Industrial Ltd; and the remaining 10 million RMB will be paid by Zhongshan
      City Weihe Appliances Co., Ltd in both July, 2009 and December 2009, 5
      million RMB respectively.

            


    

     

    
      	
               
      

            	
              2.

            	
              The
      fixed asset part. Party A will transfer some land and buildings of
      Zhongshan City Weihe Appliances Co., Ltd facilities to Party B or the
      individual(s) appointed by Party B, valued at 41.58 million RMB, which
      appreciated 15% from its fair market value of 36.16 million RMB based on
      the appraisal report done by the third party agent on June 25, 2009. The
      legal fee and tax related to this property transfer will be shared by both
      parties according Chinese law and regulations, and either Party B or the
      individual(s) appointed by Party B will be in charge of the transfer
      process. (The appraisal report and related notarization will be provided
      separately)

            


    

     

    
      	
               
      

            	
              3.

            	
              Regarding
      the remaining balance of the total purchase price of the acquisition, it
      might be paid either through external financing or issuing new shares from
      Home System Group upon further negotiation and agreement between Party A
      and Party B.

            


    

     

    


    
      
        	
                Party
      A: Home System Group

              	
                /s/
      Fuying Wang-Chief Executive Officer

              
	 	

                /s/
      Jianming Xu-Chief Financial
Officer

              


      

    

    


    
      	
              Party
      B:

            	
              /s/Xiaohong
      Chen

            


    

    /s/Liming
Jiao
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4074 Filed: 10/02/19 Entered: 10/02/19 12:39:01 Page 1 of

 3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4074 Filed: 10/02/19 Entered: 10/02/19 12:39:01 Page 2 of

 3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4074 Filed: 10/02/19 Entered: 10/02/19 12:39:01 Page 3 of

 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP

767 Fifth Avenue

New York, NY 10153-0119

Exhibit A

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4381-1 Filed: 10/22/19 Entered: 10/22/19 12:46:05 Page 1

of 3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4381-1 Filed: 10/22/19 Entered: 10/22/19 12:46:05 Page 2

of 3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4381-1 Filed: 10/22/19 Entered: 10/22/19 12:46:05 Page 3

of 3
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 10, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-40422 Summary Calendar

LESLIE IBSEN ROGGE, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus ROBERT MILES, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:03-CV-359-MAC-WCR

-------------------- Before DAVIS, SMITH and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Leslie Ibsen Rogge, federal prisoner # 13915-004, appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. Ibsen challenged the determination by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) that he had escaped from incarceration, rather than being inadvertently released, and therefore that he was not entitled to credit for the 3884 days he was out of custody. Rogge has not established that the district court erred in determining that the BOP properly found that Rogge had escaped and was not entitled toNo. 04-40422 -2- the credit. See Royal v. Tombone , 141 F.3d 596, 599 (5th Cir. 1998); Phillips v. Dutton , 378 F.2d 898, 898 (5th Cir. 1967). Rogge also contends that the BOP denied him due process by failing to give him notice and provide him with a hearing before deciding not to award him the credit for the time he spent out of custody. Because Rogge failed to exhaust his administrative remedies on this ground, he is not entitled to relief. See United States v. Wilson , 503 U.S. 329, 335-36 (1992). Even if Rogge had exhausted the claim, he has not demonstrated a due process violation. Cf. Wolff v. McDonnell , 418 U.S. 539, 557, 561 (1974); Malchi v. Thaler , 211 F.3d 953, 957-58 (5th Cir. 2000). The judgment of the district court is thus AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED
IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>            MAR-31-1999

<CASH>                          15,858,476 
<SECURITIES>                          0    
<RECEIVABLES>                    1,669,790 
<ALLOWANCES>                          0    
<INVENTORY>                           0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                17,528,266 
<PP&E>                          62,861,919 
<DEPRECIATION>                        0    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  84,607,158 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           34,640,505 
<BONDS>                               0    
<COMMON>                              0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0    
<PREFERRED>                           0    
<OTHER-SE>                      49,883,369 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    84,607,158 
<SALES>                          3,191,744 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 3,357,838 
<CGS>                                 0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    1,981,767 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   135,966 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 596,249 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    643,856 
<INCOME-TAX>                          0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                643,856 
<DISCONTINUED>                        0    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0    
<CHANGES>                             0    
<NET-INCOME>                       643,856 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         3.56 
<EPS-DILUTED>                         3.56 

        

</TABLE>
#### STATE v. ZEB PAGE.

(Filed 20 March, 1940.)

Criminal law § 80 — Appeal dismissed for failure of defendant to prosecute same.

Defendant was convicted of a capital felony and was allowed to appeal *in forma pauperis.*Upon certificate of the clerk that nothing has been done towards perfecting the appeal and that the time for filing it has expired, and his statement in the certificate that he is informed by counsel that they do not intend to prosecute the appeal, the appeal is dismissed upon motion of the Attorney-General, there being no apparent error on the face of the record proper. Bule of Practice in the Supreme Court, No. 17.

MotioN by State to docket and dismiss appeal.

*Attorney-General McMullan for the State.*

Stacy, C. J.

At the December Term, 1939, Johnston Superior Court, the defendant herein, Zeb Page, was tried upon indictment charging him with rape, which resulted in a conviction of the capital offense, and sentence of death as the law commands on such verdicts.

From the judgment thus entered, the defendant gave notice of appeal and was allowed to prosecute same *in forma pauperis.*The clerk certifies that nothing has been done towards perfecting the appeal and that the time for filing it has expired. He further states in his certificate that he is informed by counsel they do not intend to prosecute the appeal. *S. v. Stovall,*214 N. C., 695, 200 S. E., 426.

In the absence of any apparent error, which the record now before us fails to disclose, the motion of the Attorney-General to docket and dismiss under Rule 17 will be allowed. *S. v. Moore,*216 N. C., 543.

Judgment affirmed. Appeal dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5014 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5014

To suspend foreign assistance to certain countries related to unlawful 
                               migration.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 30, 2014

 Mr. Weber of Texas (for himself, Mr. Yoho, Mr. Chabot, Mr. Stockman, 
Mr. Sessions, and Mr. Neugebauer) introduced the following bill; which 
            was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend foreign assistance to certain countries related to unlawful 
                               migration.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Illegal Entry Accountability Act of 
2014''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

     Congress finds the following:
            (1) The border between the United States and Mexico is not 
        secure on either side, thereby allowing hundreds of thousands 
        of individuals annually to enter the United States illegally.
            (2) The majority of the individuals illegally crossing the 
        United States-Mexico border are from Mexico, Honduras, 
        Guatemala, and El Salvador.
            (3) Today, tens of thousands of unaccompanied alien 
        children are crossing the United States-Mexico border sparking 
        a humanitarian crisis and endangering thousands of children.
            (4) The Department of Homeland Security is spending 
        millions of Americans' tax dollars to process and provide 
        housing and healthcare services to unaccompanied alien 
        children.
            (5) The countries previously listed have failed to secure 
        their borders and have failed to adopt and enforce policies 
        that discourage illegal immigration into the United States.

SEC. 3. SUSPENSION OF FOREIGN ASSISTANCE.

    (a) In General.--Upon enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State 
shall immediately suspend all United States foreign assistance to the 
countries of Mexico, Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador. Such 
assistance may be reinstated only if Congress determines that Mexico, 
Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador have taken sufficient action to 
mitigate unlawful United States-Mexico border crossings by their 
respective citizens.
    (b) Report.--The Secretary of State shall annually submit to 
Congress a report documenting the measures taken by Mexico, Honduras, 
Guatemala and El Salvador to mitigate unlawful entry into the United 
States by its citizens.
    (c) Exception.--Foreign assistance distributed under the 
International Narcotic Control Law Enforcement program shall not be 
considered under subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

JASON LEE COLLINS,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 5D18-2312

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

________________________________/

Opinion filed October 12, 2018

Petition for Belated Appeal

A Case of Original Jurisdiction. 

Jason Lee Collins, Milton, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General 

Tallahassee, and Kaylee D. Tatman, 

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Respondent. 

PER CURIAM. 

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed

with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the November 2, 2017

judgment and sentence rendered in Case No. 2017-CF-000820, in the Circuit Court in 

and for Hernando County, Florida. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D). 

PETITION GRANTED.

COHEN, C.J., WALLIS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION

-andPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY,

Debtors.

Case No, 19-30088 (DM)

Chapter 11

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

TRANSFER OF CLAIM OTHER THAN FOR SECURITY

A CLAIM HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS CASE or deemed filed under 11 U.S.C. §1111 (a). Transferee hereby gives notice 

pursuant to Rule 3001(e) (2), Fed. R. Bankr. P., of the transfer, other than for security, of the claim referenced in this notice.

CONTRARIAN FUNDS, LLC

Name of Transferee

Address for all Communications/Notices:

CONTRARIAN FUNDS, LLC

411 WEST PUTNAM AVE., SUITE 425

GREENWICH, CT 06830

ATTN: ALISA MUMOLA

Phone: 203-862-8211

Fax: 203-485-5910

Email: tradeclaimsgroup@contrariancapital.com

Address for all Payments/Distributions:

CONTRARIAN FUNDS, LLC

ATTN: 392426

500 ROSS ST 154-0455

PITTSBURGH, PA 15262

CLEAVELAND PRICE INC. 

Name of Transferor

Name and Current Address of Transferor:

CLEAVELAND PRICE INC. 

14000 ROUTE 993

TRAFFORD, PA 15085

ATTN: STACY HARDY

I declare under penalty of perjury that the information provided in this notice

is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

By:_______/s/ Alisa Mumola_________

 Transferee/Transferee’s Agent

Date: November 13, 2019

Penalty for making a false statement: Fine of up to $500,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years, or both. 18 U.S.C. §§ 152 & 3571.

Schedule/Claim No. Creditor Name Amount Debtor Case No.

Schedule F Cleaveland/Price Inc $43,606.00 Pacific Gas and Electric Company 19-30089

Claim No. 2952 Cleaveland Price Inc. $42,841.35 Pacific Gas and Electric Company 19-30089

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4693 Filed: 11/13/19 Entered: 11/13/19 08:49:03 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4693 Filed: 11/13/19 Entered: 11/13/19 08:49:03 Page 2 of

2
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanced Battery Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarter period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Sharon Xiaorong Tang, Chief Financial Officer of Advanced Battery Technologies, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Advanced Battery Technologies, Inc. as of and for the period covered by the Report.  Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, this certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed. Dated:  May 15, 2007/s/ Sharon Xiaorong Tang
Sharon Xiaorong Tang
Chief Financial Officer