alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE & FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Intercell
International  Corporation  for the  quarter  ended March 31,  2006,  I, R. Mark
Richards, Chief Executive Officer of Intercell International Corporation, hereby
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

        a.     such Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Intercell  International
               Corporation for the quarter ended March 31, 2006,  fully complies
               with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
               Exchange Act of 1934; and

        b.     the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
               of  Intercell  International  Corporation  for the quarter  ended
               March 31, 2006, fairly presents,  in all material  respects,  the
               financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  Intercell
               International Corporation.


                                           /s/R. Mark Richards
                                           ---------------------------
                                           R. Mark Richards, Chief
                                           Executive Officer


Date:    May 11, 2006



A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Intercell  International  Corporation  and  will  be  retained  by
Intercell International Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit32.1**

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO and CFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of HCW Pension Real EstateFund Limited Partnership (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period endedMarch 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the "Report"), Steven D. Cordes, as the equivalent of the ChiefExecutive Officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalentof the Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership.

 

 

 

 

Thiscertification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-24-00149-CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding

322nd District Court of Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 322-744263-23

Before Walker, Bassel, and Womack, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

IN RE C.M., Relator
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion 

for emergency relief and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, 

relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency relief are denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered: April 10, 2024
Exhibit 32.1
                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                 PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanced Battery
Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I,
Zhiguo Fu, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of
Advanced Battery Technologies, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

           1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

           2.    The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Advanced Battery Technologies, Inc. as of and for the
period covered by the Report.

     Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission, this certification is being furnished and is not deemed
filed.

Dated:  May 15, 2006                             /s/ Zhiguo Fu
                                                 -------------------------
                                                 Zhiguo Fu
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Shirley Lenoir, Individually and as personal representative of the 

estate of Shana Lenoir and Christopher McKnight , Individually and as 

next friend of Nayla McKnight v. U.T. Physicians, Angela Mathews, 

Leah Ann Gonski Marino f/k/a Leah Ann Gonski, and Jaou-Chen 

Huang, M.D. 

Appellate case number: 01-14-00767-CV

Trial court case number: 2012-35806

Trial court: 164th District Court of Harris County

Appellant’s Opposed Motion to Extend Time to File Notice of Interlocutory Appeal is 

GRANTED. Appellant’s notice of appeal is considered timely filed as of September 12, 2014.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Harvey Brown

 Acting individually 

Date: November 25, 2014
Exhibit 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MidSouth
Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the
period ending March 31, 2003 (the "Report"), I, C.R.
Cloutier, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
that:

        (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

        (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.



________________________
C.R. Cloutier
Chief Executive Officer
May 14, 2003
Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14 
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934  I, Sharon Xiaorong Tang, Chief Financial Officer of Advanced Battery Technologies, Inc. (the Registrant), certify that: 1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 of the Registrant. 2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. 3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in the report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods, presented in the report. 4.   The other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have: (a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c)    Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5.   The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent function): (a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting. Dated:  August 14, 2007/s/ Sharon Xiaorong Tang
Sharon Xiaorong Tang
Chief Financial Officer
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 08-2274

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Sherri Beth Forrest, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: October 6, 2009 Filed: October 13, 2009

___________ Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Sherri Forrest challenges the 57-month sentence the district court 1 imposed after she pleaded guilty to a drug crime. Her counsel has filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he seek s permission to withdraw, arguing that Forrest’s within-Guidelines-range sentence is unreasonable. We will enforce the appeal wa iver in this case. SeeUnited States v. Andis , 333 F.3d 886, 889-90 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (court will enforce appeal waiver in plea

1 The Honorable Patrick J. Schiltz, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.agreement when appeal falls within scope of waiver, both waiver and plea agreement were entered into knowingly and voluntarily , and enforcing waiver would not result in miscarriage of justice). This appeal falls within the scope of the waiver contained in Forrest’s plea agreement, waiving the ri ght to appeal any sentence at or below 168 months; the record shows the requisite knowledge and voluntarin ess; and we see nothing to suggest that a miscarriage of justice would result by enforcing the appeal waiver, see United States v. Toothman , 543 F.3d 967, 970 (8th Cir. 2008) (withinGuidelines-range sentence is presumptively reasonable on appeal). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s moti on to withdraw on condition that counsel inform appellant about the procedures for filing petitions for rehearing and for certiorari, and we dismiss the appeal.

______________________________

-2-
<TABLE>
                                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1

               INTERLINK COMPUTER SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                 COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE (1)
                      (in thousands, except per share data)

<CAPTION>
                                                                     Three months ended
                                                                     ------------------
                                                        September 30, 1997   September 30, 1996
                                                        ------------------   ------------------
                                                                        (unaudited)
<S>                                                              <C>              <C>   
Primary and fully diluted:
     Weighted average shares.........................             7,557            4,998
     Common equivalent shares from stock options
         and warrants................................               --             1,159
                                                                -------           ------

Shares used in per share calculation.................             7,557            6,147
                                                                =======           ======

Net income (loss)....................................           $(3,741)          $  439
                                                                =======           ======

Net income (loss) per share..........................           $  (.50)          $ 0.07
                                                                =======           ======

<FN>
(1)  There is no difference between primary and fully diluted net income (loss) per share for
     all periods presented.

</FN>
</TABLE>
                                       28
**Exhibit32**

 

**Certificationof CEO and CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of HyperFeed Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officersof the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of hisknowledge, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: May 5, 2005 |                                   |
|-------------------|----------------------------------------|
|              |                                   |
|              | /s/ Paul Pluschkell                    |   |
|              | Paul Pluschkell                        |
|              | President and Chief  Executive Officer |
|              |                                   |
| Date: May 5, 2005 |                                   |
|              |                                   |
|              | /s/ Randall J. Frapart                 |   |
|              | Randall J. Frapart                     |
|              | Chief Financial Officer                |

 

 

This certificationaccompanies the Report pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 and shall not be deemed filed by HyperFeed Technologies, Inc. for purposesof section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 hasbeen provided to HyperFeed Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by HyperFeedTechnologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

 

----
#### Clarence Duke McGANN, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL, DISTRICT OF MARYLAND, Appellee. Clarence Duke McGANN, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

Nos. 9725, 9726.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued July 2, 1965.

Decided July 6, 1965.

Lowell R. Bowen, Baltimore, Md. (Court-assigned counsel) for appellant.

Ronald T. Osborn, Asst. U. S. Atty. (Thomas J. Kenney, U. S. Atty., on brief), for appellee.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, SOBELOFF, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

For the reasons stated by the District Judge in his opinion, 233 F.Supp. 419, the denial of the petition to vacate the Maryland sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is affirmed. This makes it unnecessary to consider the jurisdiction of the District Court of Maryland to entertain a habeas corpus petition attacking the New York conviction,

Affirmed.
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3074-3    Filed: 07/18/19    Entered: 07/18/19 16:00:20    Page 1of 18

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3074-3    Filed: 07/18/19    Entered: 07/18/19 16:00:20    Page 2of 18

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3074-3    Filed: 07/18/19    Entered: 07/18/19 16:00:20    Page 3of 18

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3074-3    Filed: 07/18/19    Entered: 07/18/19 16:00:20    Page 4of 18

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3074-3    Filed: 07/18/19    Entered: 07/18/19 16:00:20    Page 5of 18

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3074-3    Filed: 07/18/19    Entered: 07/18/19 16:00:20    Page 6of 18

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3074-3    Filed: 07/18/19    Entered: 07/18/19 16:00:20    Page 7of 18

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3074-3    Filed: 07/18/19    Entered: 07/18/19 16:00:20    Page 8of 18

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3074-3    Filed: 07/18/19    Entered: 07/18/19 16:00:20    Page 9of 18

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3074-3    Filed: 07/18/19    Entered: 07/18/19 16:00:20    Page 10of 18

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3074-3    Filed: 07/18/19    Entered: 07/18/19 16:00:20    Page 11of 18

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3074-3    Filed: 07/18/19    Entered: 07/18/19 16:00:20    Page 12of 18

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3074-3    Filed: 07/18/19    Entered: 07/18/19 16:00:20    Page 13of 18

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3074-3    Filed: 07/18/19    Entered: 07/18/19 16:00:20    Page 14of 18

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3074-3    Filed: 07/18/19    Entered: 07/18/19 16:00:20    Page 15of 18

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3074-3    Filed: 07/18/19    Entered: 07/18/19 16:00:20    Page 16of 18

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3074-3    Filed: 07/18/19    Entered: 07/18/19 16:00:20    Page 17of 18

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3074-3    Filed: 07/18/19    Entered: 07/18/19 16:00:20    Page 18of 18
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

Wednesday, June 9, 2010; 10 a.m.-12 Noon. 

# PLACE:

Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland. 

# STATUS:

Closed to the Public. 

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

#### Compliance Status Report 

The Commission staff will brief the Commission on the status of compliance matters. 

For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, call (301) 504-7948. 

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814 (301) 504-7923. 

Dated: June 2, 2010. 

Todd A. Stevenson, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-13515 Filed 6-2-10; 11:15 am] 

BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Lightlake Therapeutics Inc. (the"Company") for the year ended July 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Seijin Ki, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: November 10, 2010





By: /s/ Seijin Ki


Seijin Ki


Chief Financial Officer











This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Filed: August 19, 1996

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2685

(CA-95-366, BK-93-11389C-7W-B)

Wilbur P. Hollar, et al,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

William Steven Myers, et al,

Defendants - Appellees.

ORDER

The Court amends its opinion filed April 4, 1996, as follows:

On page 2, line 8 of the opinion -- "(M.D.N.C. Sept. 5, 1995)"

is corrected to read "(M.D.N.C. Aug. 23, 1995)."

For the Court - By Direction

/s/ Bert M. Montague

Clerk
2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2685

In Re: WILBUR P. HOLLAR; In Re: RUTH CAROL

HOLLAR,

Debtors.

_________________________

WILBUR P. HOLLAR; RUTH CAROL HOLLAR,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

WILLIAM STEVEN MYERS; LINDA WEST MYERS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, District

Judge. (CA-95-366, BK-93-11389C-7W-B)

Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 4, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wilbur P. Hollar, Ruth Carol Hollar, Appellants Pro Se. Leslie

Gray Frye, Sr., FRYE & BOOTH, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for

Appellees.
3
4

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal from the district court's order affirming

the bankruptcy court's order dismissing their adversary action for

failure to comply with discovery and alternatively granting Defendants' motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and

the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Appellants' motion for summary reversal and affirm

on the reasoning of the district court. Hollar v. Myers, Nos. CA95-366; BK-93-11389C-7W-B (M.D.N.C. Aug. 23, 1995). Additionally,

we deny Appellants' motion to strike Appellees' informal brief. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CFO CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADDED BY
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   (i)
    
    the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
  /s/ Robert CoppleRobert CoppleChief Financial OfficerSubscribed and sworn to before me this 10th day of March 2009./s/ Carol WaldmanName: Carol WaldmanTitle: Notary Public