alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

Northern District of California

In re:

Debtor(s)

Bankruptcy No.:

R.S. No.:

Hearing Date:

Time:

Relief From Stay Cover Sheet

Instructions: Complete caption and Section A for all motions. Complete Section B for mobile homes, motor vehicles, and personal property.

Complete Section C for real property. Utilize Section C as necessary. If moving party is not a secured creditor, briefly summarize the nature

of the motion in Section D.

(A) Date Petition Filed: Chapter:

Prior hearings on this obligation: Last Day to File §523/§727 Complaints:

(B) Description of personal property collateral (e.g. 1983 Ford Taurus):

Secured Creditor [ ] or lessor [ ]

Fair market value: $________________ Source of value:__________________

Contract Balance: $________________ Pre-Petition Default: $_______________

Monthly Payment: $________________ No. of months: ___________

Insurance Advance: $________________ Post-Petition Default: $_______________

No. of months: ___________

 (C) Description of real property collateral (e.g. Single family residence, Oakland, CA):

Fair market value: $_______________ Source of value:_______________ If appraisal, date:___________

Moving Party's position (first trust deed, second, abstract, etc.):

Approx. Bal. $_______________ Pre-Petition Default: $_______________

As of (date): _______________ No. of months: ____________

Mo. payment: $_______________ Post-Petition Default: $_______________

Notice of Default (date): __________ No. of months: ____________

Notice of Trustee's Sale: __________ Advances Senior Liens: $_______________

Specify name and status of other liens and encumbrances, if known (e.g. trust deeds, tax liens, etc.):

Position Amount Mo. Payment Defaults

1st Trust Deed:_____________________ $_______________ $_______________ $_______________

2nd Trust Deed: ____________________ $_______________ $_______________ $_______________

_________________________________:

_________________________________:

_________________________________:

(Total) $_______________ $_______________ $_______________

(D) Other pertinent information:

______________________________________

Signature

______________________________________

Print or Type Name

Attorney for___________________________________

CANB Documents Northern District of California 

Dated:

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY 19-30089 (DM)

11/13/2019

10:00 am

01/29/2019 11

N/A 06/29/2019

Relief is sought as to litigation against the Debtor in the United States District Court for the Northern District of 

California, Case No. 3-15-CV-02383. 

10/18/2019

LEAH E. CAPRITTA 

UNITED ENERGY TRADING, LLC

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4323-1 Filed: 10/18/19 Entered: 10/18/19 19:20:23 Page 1

of 1
#### Rose Meyers, Appellant, v. Leon M. Hirsch, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion.
Exhibit 10.1


 





AMENDMENT NO. 3

TO

INVENTERGY GLOBAL, INC.

2014 STOCK PLAN


 


Adopted on June 28, 2016


 


This Amendment No. 3 to Inventergy Global,
Inc. 2014 Stock Plan, as amended (the Inventergy Global, Inc. 2014 Stock Plan, the “Plan” and this Amendment No. 3,
the “Amendment”), is made effective as of June 28, 2016 by Inventergy Global, Inc. (the “Company”).


 


WITNESSETH:


 


WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of
the Company (the “Board”) deems it advisable and in the best interest of the Company to amend the Plan pursuant to
this Amendment to increase the number of shares authorized for issuance under the Plan; and


 


WHEREAS, the stockholders of the Company
approved this Amendment at the Company’s 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on June 28, 2016 pursuant to Section 10(d)
of the Plan.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended
as follows:


 


Section 4(a) of the Plan is hereby amended
to read in its entirety as follows:


 


“(a) Basic Limitation.  Not
more than Seven Hundred Eighty Thousand, Five Hundred Forty Five (780,545) Shares may be issued under the Plan, subject to Subsection
(b) below and Section 8(a).2 All of these Shares may be issued upon the exercise of ISOs. The number of Shares that are subject
to Options or other rights outstanding at any time under the Plan may not exceed the number of Shares that then remain available
for issuance under the Plan. The Company, during the term of the Plan, shall at all times reserve and keep available sufficient
Shares to satisfy the requirements of the Plan. Shares offered under the Plan may be authorized but unissued Shares or treasury
Shares.”


 


Exhibit A containing the “Schedule
of Shares Reserved for Issuance under the Plan” is hereby updated to take account for this Amendment. All other terms and
provisions of the Plan shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect as written.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 3
is made effective this 28th day of June 2016.


  





	 	INVENTERGY GLOBAL, INC.	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/ Joe Beyers	 
	 	 	Name: Joe Beyers
	 	 	Title: Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 10

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2823-11 Filed: 07/02/19 Entered: 07/02/19 12:56:04 Page 1

of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO HERRING 

ASSOCIATION, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 14-cv-04393-WHO

ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY 

CLOSING CASE

Re: Dkt. No. 201

As bankruptcy proceedings have been initiated and an automatic stay imposed, this case is 

ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED and all pending motions are terminated.

Once the bankruptcy proceedings conclude, the stay is lifted, or it otherwise becomes 

appropriate to reopen this case, the parties shall notify the Court and the matter will be reopened 

and the submitted motion ruled upon.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 11, 2019

William H. Orrick

United States District Judge

William H. Orrick

Case 3:14-cv-04393-WHO Document 202 Filed 02/11/19 Page 1 of 1

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2823-11 Filed: 07/02/19 Entered: 07/02/19 12:56:04 Page 2

of 2
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

MIDSOUTH BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES                               EXHIBIT 11
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE  (Unaudited)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2004 AND 2003 AND
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 2003

                                    First Quarter    First Quarter
                                     March 31,        March 31,
BASIC                                   2004             2003
                                    _____________    _____________
<S>                                 <C>              <C>
Earnings:
    Income applicable to common
      stock                          $1,660,948       $1,309,552
                                    ============     ============
Shares:
    Weighted average number of
      common shares outstanding       3,184,337        3,178,879
                                    ============     ============
Earnings per common share:
    Income applicable to common
      stock                               $0.52            $0.41
                                    ============     ============

DILUTED

Earnings:
    Net income                       $1,660,948       $1,309,552
                                    ============     ============
Weighted average number of
    common shares outstanding         3,184,337        3,178,879

    Assuming exercise of options,
      reduced by the number of
      shares which could have
      been purchased with the
      proceeds from exercise of
      such options at the
      average issue price               149,816           90,063
                                    ____________     ____________
    Weighted average number of
      common shares outstanding,
      as adjusted                     3,334,153        3,268,942
                                    ============     ============

Fully diluted earnings per common
  share                                   $0.50            $0.40
                                    ============     ============


</TABLE>
#### Henry W. Johnson, Plaintiff, v. Edward G. Williams, Defendant.

Judgment ordered for glaintiff, with costs against the defendant irecting that he perform his contract and accept the deed tendered by the plaintiff, and, in other respects, comply with the terms of the agreement. Opinion by

O’Brien, J.
Exhibit 31

                            FORM OF CERTIFICATION TO BE
                              PROVIDED WITH FORM 10-K


     Re: Securitized Asset Backed Receivables LLC Trust 2007-NC1, issued
         pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of January 1,
         2007, between Securitized Asset Backed Receivables LLC, as depositor,
         NC Capital Corporation as responsible party Barclays Capital Real
         Estate Inc. d/b/a HomEq Servicing, as servicer, and Deutsche Bank
         National Trust Company, as trustee.

I, Paul Menefee, certify that:

     1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
Form 10-K of Securitized Asset Backed Receivables LLC Trust 2007-NC1 (the
"Exchange Act periodic reports");

     2.  Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,
taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
Report;

     3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and
other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the
period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
reports;

     4.  Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements
required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except
as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
material respects; and

     5.  All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
 criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as trustee.

Date:3/28/08


/s/Paul Menefee
Paul Menefee
Vice President and
Chief Accounting Office
(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EXHIBIT B

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4255-2 Filed: 10/17/19 Entered: 10/17/19 15:02:41 Page 1

of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EXHIBIT B

HOURS BY TASK FOR

FOR THE PERIOD AUGUST 18, 2019 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 17, 2019

TASK DESCRIPTION HOURS

Meetings and Telephone Calls with Client and/or Client Attorney 30.00

Internal Client Meetings 19.50

Research and Writing 18.50

Working with the Media 31.50

Listening to, or Attending, Court Hearings 14.00

Communications with External Stakeholders .50

TOTAL 223.50

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4255-2 Filed: 10/17/19 Entered: 10/17/19 15:02:41 Page 2

of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         262,625
<SECURITIES>                                 6,901,651
<RECEIVABLES>                                  431,254
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               111,477
<PP&E>                                      22,571,385
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,117,879
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,160,513
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,221,540
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,938,973
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,160,513
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,237,437
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,349,577
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (112,140)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (112,140)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (112,140)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (112,140)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of NewMarket China, Inc.'s (the "Company")
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 (the
"Report"), I, Philip J. Rauch, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                                     /s/ Philip J. Rauch
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Philip J. Rauch
                                                     Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 21, 2007
* Pursuant to 5TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 24, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41116 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JESUS REYES-OLVERA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:05-CR-288-ALL

-------------------- Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jesus Reyes-Olvera (Reyes) appeals the 24-month sentence he received upon his guilty-plea conviction of illegal reentry by an alien. Reyes contends that the district court erred by characterizing his state felony conviction for possession of a controlled substance as an “aggravated felony” for purposes of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C). Relief on this issue is not available in light of circuit precedent. See United States v. Hinojosa-Lopez , 130 F.3d 691, 693-94 (5th Cir. 1997). Reyes argues that this circuit’s precedent is inconsistent with JeromeNo. 05-41116 -2- v. United States , 318 U.S. 101 (1943). Having preceded HinojosaLopez , Jerome is not “an intervening Supreme Court case explicitly or implicitly overruling that prior precedent.” See United States v. Short , 181 F.3d 620, 624 (5th Cir. 1999). Reyes also makes a constitutional challenge to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b), but it is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United
States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although Reyes contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez , 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Reyes properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certifications  The undersigned officers certify that this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Advanced Battery Technologies, Inc.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Advanced Battery Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Advanced Battery Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  November 12, 2008 /s/ Zhiguo Fu Zhiguo Fu (Chief Executive Officer)  November 12, 2008 /s/ Dahe Zhang Dahe Zhang (Chief Financial Officer)
#### Micajah Jackson v. The City of Rochester.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7159

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CHRISTOPHER HASTINGS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (2:05-cv-03584-PMD; 2:98-cr-00600) Submitted: February 15, 2007 Decided: February 21, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christopher Hastings, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Hayden Bickerton, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Christopher Hastings seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as successive his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hastings has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
#### In the Matter of Horace Anderson and Others.

—Motion to confirm report denied. See Mem.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ROBERT MORTENSEN, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-1363

)

BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, )

f/k/a BANK OF NEW YORK, as trustee )

for the benefit of the Certificate Holders )

of the CWALT, INC., Alternative Loan )

Trust 2004-8CB, Mortgage Pass-Through )

Certificates, Series 2004-8CB, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed February 23, 2018. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Highlands 

County; Michael E. Raiden, Judge.

Scott R. LeConey and Danielle L. Brewer of 

Swaine & Harris, P.A., Lake Placid; and 

David F. Schumacher of John K. McClure, 

P.A., Sebring, for Appellant. 

Dariel Abrahamy of Greenspoon Marder, 

P.A., Boca Raton, for Appellee

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

VILLANTI, SLEET, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3662    Filed: 08/22/19    Entered: 08/22/19 13:49:35    Page 1 of2

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3662    Filed: 08/22/19    Entered: 08/22/19 13:49:35    Page 2 of2
#### Ellen Golden, Respondent, v. George H. Wooster, Appellant.

Order granting judgment for fnvolousness of answer affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

OF NATCO GROUP INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, John U. Clarke , Chief Executive Officer of NATCO Group Inc. (the Company), and, I, Richard W. FitzGerald, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/    JOHN U. CLARKEName: John U. ClarkeDate: November 14, 2005




/S/    RICHARD W.
FITZGERALDName: Richard W. FitzGeraldDate: November 14, 2005