alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Christian Cook, Respondent, v. Josephine Rowell, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, 'with costs.—

Merwin, J.:

I fail to find in this case any good ground for reversal. The action is on two notes, and the defendant cannot complain because the plaintiff has recovered on but ofie. Whethei the defendant in fact indorsed the last note, and whether there was any duress as to the indorsement of either, were questions of fact and disposed of by the referee in favor of plaintiff. The giving of time was a sufficient consideration." The defendant says she was not in any event to be troubled or called on for pay, but this, if a defense, was a question of fact. The defendant says that more interest was allowed than was demanded. The argument is based on what was evidently a .clerical error. Besides, the aggregate of the demand is more than the recovery. The defendant was ari accommodation indorser for the maker for valuable consideration and liable for the full amount. The judgment should be affirmed, without opinion.

Hardin, P. J., and Martin, J , concurred.
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4247    Filed: 10/17/19    Entered: 10/17/19 12:04:27    Page 1 of2

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4247    Filed: 10/17/19    Entered: 10/17/19 12:04:27    Page 2 of2
7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EXHIBIT B

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4533-2 Filed: 10/31/19 Entered: 10/31/19 11:26:23 Page 1

of 2
8

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

COMPENSATION BY PROJECT FOR SERVICES RENDERED 

BY BERMAN AND TODDERUD LLP FOR THE PERIOD 

SEPTEMBER 1, 2019 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2019

Description Hours Amount

2000-2001 Energy Crisis FERC Litigation 177.6 $141,618.00

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4533-2 Filed: 10/31/19 Entered: 10/31/19 11:26:23 Page 2

of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EXHIBIT E

Detailed Expense Entries

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3995-5 Filed: 09/24/19 Entered: 09/24/19 17:25:35 Page 1

of 2
CCourtCalr 

INVOICE f RECEIPT 

AH amounlS below are In U.S. Dollars 

COURTCAl.L ID: 9984959 

CASE MJMSERi'NAME: 19-30088 / PG&E Corporalion 

CUSTOMER REF. NUMBER: 

PROCEEDING: Hearing 

DATE Of HEARING: Wednesday, August 1411'1, 2019 at 9:30 AM PT 

FIRM NAME: Alex Lange· In Pro Per/Pio Se 

ATTORNEY/PARTY APPEARING: Alex Lange 

TELEPHONE: (914) 584-5969 

FAXIEMAIL: 

BASIC FEEAAlE FEE: 5237.50 

AMOUNT PAID: $237.50 

PAYMENT NOW DUE: $0.00 

638l~Ci,.;le 

losAngeles. CA 90045 

Phone: (BU) 8&U878 

Fa,c 18881 883-2946 

CounC.11.corn 

Courtc-f-... d,oo..,..ofeo.te:aa• 

OS/151201• tZ:41 PM 

The duration of lhis can was 436 mi'udss. The 'Basie Fee' above was calculaled as follows: 

$35.00 base fee fer lhe lim 45 nnutes plus 27 x 15-fflnule lncrement(s) at S7.50 each. 

Payment Details 

Method 

Credit Chaige 

Amount Rererence Datetrme 

S237.50 American Express 811Sl'l019 12:45:14PM 

If the 'Pay,Mnt Now Due' llldlcatad abova la zero, no pa!fmant Is dua and thl• racalpt Is for your racorda only; oth1rwla1, the 

amoulll lndlcalitd la now due. 

If there Is an amount due. p!ane rcmil your payment upon receipt of 1111s nollc:e. If you have alleady sent paymenl please COlllad ow 

Aecounlfno Dlpaf1mlnl •• our rec:ords do not relled receipt of payment at the llma lhla nodca was tent. IF PAYMENT IS NOT 

RECEIVED. FUTURE SERVICE MAY BE DENIED ANO/OR THE COURT MAY BE ADVISED OF YOUR REFUSAL TO PAY. 

PAYMENT BY CREDIT CARD or COURTCALL DEBIT ACCOUNT: Payment 0111 be made onl!ne by registering and '°Wlnll In et 

www.00Urtca1l.cam or by calling (888) 88%-6878 and 1eleding option "6' for lhe Accountktg Depa,tment. Please have your CouttCall Debit 

Account number « complela aedit card billing addrass In addition to tlla cred"d card runber, expltalion dale and ealdhOldeta 6.10 nama 

available when maling payment. 

Pt.EASE DETACH AND R!lURNTHE l'CRTION BELOW F PAVIHG 8'I' CH£CK O" IIIOJil!YORD!R 

PAYIIENT BY CHECK OR MONEY ORDER: If a balance Is Clul delach Ind 1'11111 this payment section wllh yaur check. payable to: 

CaurtCaD lLC. ah Arizona Chr.. Loi Aftgala1, CA 90045. Please write lhe COUr1Cd ID number In Ille l'llllnlO section of yOU' 

mock. Pleasa now. CCul1Call does not accept pe150nal chacks. 

COURTCAU ID: 9984959 

CASENAMEINUMBER: 19-30088/PG&E C~ 

CUSTOMER REF. NUMBER: 

PRoceeDING: Heating 

DATE OF HEARING: Wednesday. August 14th. 2010 at 0:30 AM PT 

FIRM NAME: Alex Lange - In PIO PedPto Sa 

ATTORNEY/PARTY APPEARING: Alex Lange 

TELEPHONE: (914} 584-5969 

INVOIC& FOR COURTCAU.eAPPEARANCE 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3995-5 Filed: 09/24/19 Entered: 09/24/19 17:25:35 Page 2

of 2
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 108 (Monday, June 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 32187]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13582]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Research Resources: Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Research Resources 
Special Emphasis Panel; CTSA Renewal.
    Date: October 13-14, 2010.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hilton Rockville, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 
20852.
    Contact Person: Mohan Viswanathan, PhD, Deputy Director, Office 
of Review, National Center for Research Resources, National 
Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Dem. 1, Room 1084, MSC 
4874, Bethesda, MD 20892-4874, 301-435-0829, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0e63783f3e684e60676620696178"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a5c8d39495c3e5cbcccd8bc2cad3">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research; 93.371, Biomedical 
Technology; 93.389, Research Infrastructure; 93.306, 93.333; 93.702, 
ARRA Related Construction Awards, National Institutes of Health, 
HHS)

    Dated: June 1, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-13582 Filed 6-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PEDRO ALONSO, a.k.a. Pedro Morfin

Alonso,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-71874

Agency No. A092-187-124

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 14, 2013** 

Before: LEAVY, THOMAS, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Pedro Alonso, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8

U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law. Ramirez-Villalpando v.

FILED

MAY 20 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Holder, 645 F.3d 1035, 1038 (9th Cir. 2011). We deny in part and dismiss in part

the petition for review.

The agency correctly determined that Alonso was convicted of an

aggravated felony drug trafficking crime as defined in 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(B)

that renders him removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii). The record of

conviction establishes that Alonso was convicted of possession for sale of a

controlled substance in violation of California Health & Safety Code § 11378 with

a sentencing enhancement under § 11370.4(b)(1) because he possessed more than 1

kilogram of a substance containing methamphetamine, amphetamine or

phencyclidine and its analogs. See 21 C.F.R. § 1308.12(d)(2); Rendon v. Mukasey,

520 F.3d 967, 976 (9th Cir. 2008) (“[P]ossession of a controlled substance with the

intent to sell contains a trafficking element and is an aggravated felony.”); see also

Ramirez-Villalpando, 645 F.3d at 1040-41 (using an abstract of judgment in

combination with the charging document to establish that a conviction was for a

removable offense).

The agency correctly determined that Alonso’s aggravated felony conviction

renders him statutorily ineligible for asylum, cancellation of removal, and

voluntary departure, see 8 U.S.C. §§ 1158(b)(2)(A)(ii), B(i), 1229b(a)(3),

1229c(b)(1)(C), and he has not established eligibility for any other form of relief. 

2 08-71874
In light of our disposition, we need not reach Alonso’s contentions regarding his

additional conviction and the remaining ground of removability.

Alonso’s contention that the IJ violated due process by denying him an

opportunity to present evidence is not supported by the record where Alonso

declined the opportunity to present additional information. See Lata v. INS, 204

F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring error and prejudice to prevail on a due

process claim).

Alonso’s challenge to his bond proceedings are not properly before this

court. See 8 U.S.C. § 1226(e); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.19(d).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

 

3 08-71874
H. R. 5195 

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen 

An Act 

To provide additional visas for the Afghan Special Immigrant Visa Program, and 

for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AFGHAN SPECIAL IMMIGRANT PROGRAM. 

Section 602(b)(3) of the Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009 

(8 U.S.C. 1101 note) is amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(E) SPECIAL RULE FOR END OF CALENDAR YEAR 2014.— 

‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—During the period beginning on 

the date of the enactment of this subparagraph and 

ending on December 31, 2014, an additional 1,000 principal aliens may be provided special immigrant status 

under this section. For purposes of status provided 

under this subparagraph— 

‘‘(I) the period during which an alien must 

have been employed in accordance with paragraph 

(2)(A)(ii) must terminate on or before December 

31, 2014; 

‘‘(II) the principal alien seeking special 

immigrant status under this subparagraph shall 

apply to the Chief of Mission in accordance with 

paragraph (2)(D) not later than December 31, 

2014; and 

‘‘(III) the authority to provide such status shall 

terminate on December 31, 2014. 

‘‘(ii) CONSTRUCTION.—Clause (i) shall not be construed to affect the authority, numerical limitations, 

or terms for provision of status, under subparagraph 

(D).’’. 

SEC. 2. TEMPORARY FEE INCREASE FOR CERTAIN CONSULAR SERVICES. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 

the Secretary of State, not later than January 1, 2015, shall increase 

the fee or surcharge authorized under section 140(a) of the Foreign 

Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995 (Public 

Law 103–236; 8 U.S.C. 1351 note) by $1.00 for processing machinereadable nonimmigrant visas and machine-readable combined 

border crossing identification cards and nonimmigrant visas. 

(b) DEPOSIT OF AMOUNTS.—Notwithstanding section 140(a)(2) 

of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1994 and 

1995 (Public Law 103–236; 8 U.S.C. 1351 note), the additional 
H. R. 5195—2 

amount collected pursuant the fee increase authorized under subsection (a) shall be deposited in the general fund of the Treasury. 

(c) SUNSET PROVISION.—The fee increase authorized under subsection (a) shall terminate on the date that is 5.5 years after 

the first date on which such increased fee is collected. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
EXHIBIT D

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4633-4 Filed: 11/08/19 Entered: 11/08/19 17:04:46 Page 1

of 2
EXHIBIT D 

SUMMARY OF EXPENSES 

FOR THE PERIOD MARCH 1, 2019 THROUGH MAY 31, 2019 

Expense Type Amount

Airfare 25,045.26 $ 

Data Processing / Materials For Committee 295.42 

Ground Transportation (Taxi/Uber/Car Service) 7,733.05 

Hotel Stay (Traveling) 22,952.73 

Internet/Online Fees 494.66 

Meals - Clients / Interested Parties 1,111.00 

Meals - In-Town Only 811.86 

Meals - Out-of-Town Travel Only 4,949.13 

Other / Miscellaneous 219.76 

Parking 799.60 

Printing/Photocopying (In-House) 4,750.51 

Research (Databases) 13,599.00 

Teleconferencing 181.82 

Total $82,943.80

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4633-4 Filed: 11/08/19 Entered: 11/08/19 17:04:46 Page 2

of 2
- Home
      - Grants          - Project Grants
        - Technical Assistance Grants
        - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
        - Strategic Initiatives Grants
        - Education Support Program
        - Funding Toolkit 
      - News
      - Grantee Spotlights
      - Priority Investment Areas          - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
      - Grant Management
      - About SJI          - Board of Directors
        - Executive Director
        - Past Members
        - SJI Budget 

                  - Home
                  - Grants                      - Project Grants
                    - Technical Assistance Grants
                    - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
                    - Strategic Initiatives Grants
                    - Education Support Program
                    - Funding Toolkit 
                  - News
                  - Grantee Spotlights
                  - Priority Investment Areas                      - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
                  - Grant Management
                  - About SJI                      - Board of Directors
                    - Executive Director
                    - Past Members
                    - SJI Budget 

### Supporting the Nation's Judicial System & the Public it Serves

#### 					ANNOUNCEMENT				

## Upcoming Webinar! What’s New with Virtual Child Welfare Hearings

Upcoming Webinar! The National Center for State Courts (NCSC) will be hosting: *What’s New with Virtual Child Welfare Hearings* on **December 19th, 2023, at 3:00PM EST.**

Virtual hearings were a necessity to move child welfare cases forward during the pandemic; however, some jurisdictions are continuing to find benefits to using them as a tool. In this webinar, hear from court experts about new resources to help you facilitate meaningful and effective child welfare virtual hearings.

For more information and to register now, click here: Webinar Registration – Zoom

#### LATEST NEWS & ANNOUNCEMENTS

                  -  Trauma-Informed Practices for Criminal Courts: Implementation Opportunities  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Visits The National Judicial College  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Board Awards FY 2024 Second Quarter Grants  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Visits The National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges  Read More**   

#### CONTACT US

          contact@sji.gov
                       Tel: 703.660.4979

#### HEADQUARTERS

                       State Justice Institute
                       12700 Fair Lakes Circle, Suite 340
                       Fairfax, VA 22033         

Website design by Segue Technologies, Inc.

            -  ** 
            -  **  **
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information from the Balance
Sheet, and Statement of Income, and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          6,960
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          2,744
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               22,323
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     2,605
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          5,953
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            5,952
<LOANS>                                       177,804
<ALLOWANCE>                                     1,989
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                222,172
<DEPOSITS>                                    206,015
<SHORT-TERM>                                        0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             1,116
<LONG-TERM>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        9,706
<OTHER-SE>                                      5,336
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                222,172
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 4,319
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  72
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  321
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                4,712
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              2,134
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              2,134
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           2,578
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     120
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 1,562
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,170
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      1,170
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      674
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .42
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   9.32
<LOANS-NON>                                       130
<LOANS-PAST>                                    1,307
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                2,042
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     173
<RECOVERIES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               1,989
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            1,989
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           399
        


</TABLE>
Filed: August 19, 1996 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-2685 (CA-95-366, BK-93-11389C-7W-B) Wilbur P. Hollar, et al, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus William Steven Myers, et al, Defendants - Appellees.

ORDER The Court amends its opinion filed April 4, 1996, as follows: On page 2, line 8 of the opinion -- "(M.D.N.C. Sept. 5, 1995)" is corrected to read "(M.D.N.C. Aug. 23 , 1995)." For the Court - By Direction /s/ Bert M. Montague Clerk2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-2685
In Re: WILBUR P. HOLLAR; In Re: RUTH CAROL HOLLAR, Debtors.

_________________________ WILBUR P. HOLLAR; RUTH CAROL HOLLAR, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus WILLIAM STEVEN MYERS; LINDA WEST MYERS, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, District Judge. (CA-95-366, BK-93-11389C-7W-B) Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 4, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wilbur P. Hollar, Ruth Carol Hollar, Appellants Pro Se. Leslie Gray Frye, Sr., FRYE & BOOTH, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees.34 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal from the district court's order affirming the bankruptcy court's order dismissing their adversary action forfailure to comply with discovery and alternatively granting Defendants' motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record andthe district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Appellants' motion for summary reversal and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hollar v. Myers, Nos. CA95-366; BK-93-11389C-7W-B (M.D.N.C. Aug. 23, 1995). Additionally, we deny Appellants' motion to strike Appellees' informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 35.3

                    SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)

                           HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, LLC

                RALI SERIES 2007-QO1 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of Homecomings  Financial,  LLC, as
servicer (the "Servicer") pursuant to the applicable  servicing agreement,  does
hereby certify that:

1. A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the period from and including
January 30, 2007 through and including  September 24, 2007 and of the Servicer's
performance  under the  applicable  servicing  agreement  has been made under my
supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing agreement in all material
respects  throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 24th
day of March 2008.


By:   /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      Name:   Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:  Managing Director
Opinion issued October 20, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-22-00703-CV

———————————

IN RE GRAHAM W. GILLIAM, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Graham W. Gilliam, has filed a mandamus petition challenging the 

trial court’s September 27, 2022 Default Judgment for Non-Contempt Enforcement 

Remedies and Order Granting Motion for Appointment of Receiver.1In conjunction 

with the petition, Relator filed a motion to stay the trial court’s order pending 

1 The underlying case is Diane Werlein Gilliam v. Graham Wilson Gilliam, cause 

number 2022-43163, pending in the 312th District Court of Harris County, Texas, 

the Honorable Clinton E. Wells, Jr. presiding.
2

resolution of the mandamus petition. We deny the petition and dismiss the stay 

motion as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Countiss, and Farris.