alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 15.2







CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-141639, No. 333-184955 and 333-206338) of Cellcom Israel Ltd. of our report dated March 14, 2017
relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears
in this Form 20-F.



|Tel-Aviv, Israel
        
        March 20, 2017 | /s/
Kesselman & Kesselman
        Keselman & Kesselman
        
        Certified
        Public Accountants (lsr.)
        
        A member
        firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers
        
        International Limited
|------------------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Oak Tree Educational Partners, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kellis Veach, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Oak Tree Educational Partners, Inc. and will be retained by Oak Tree Educational Partners, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/  Kellis VeachKellis VeachChief Financial Officer(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)





April 12, 2011
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EXHIBIT C

EXPENSE SUMMARY

FOR THE PERIOD MARCH 1, 2019 THROUGH MARCH 31, 2019

EXPENSES AMOUNTS

Meals $8,892.34

Transportation 8,831.85

Courier/Mail Services 1,394.02

Duplicating 1,223.95

Meeting/Deposition Rooms 218.30

Special Disbursements (including Experts) 4,290.59

Travel 222,537.35*

Total Expenses Requested: $247,388.40 

* - Hotel expenses have been capped for reimbursement purposes at $600.00/night. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3084-3 Filed: 07/18/19 Entered: 07/18/19 17:46:16 Page 1

of 1
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 13, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, June 13, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19A1564. ASPIRE AT WEST MIDTOWN APARTMENTS, L.P. v. MARY A. MCBEE et al.
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EXHIBIT H 

Jenner & Block Budget Comparison 

January 29, 2019 through May 31, 2019 

Matter 

ID 

PROJECT CATEGORY BUDGETED REQUESTED 

10006 Criminal Investigation $1,055,000 $384,188.10 

10014 DOI Investigation $30,000 $2,941.60 

10065 Federal Contracts Advice and Counsel $22,000 $11,415.00 

10081 FCC Regulatory Advice and Counsel $50,000 $32,675.60 

10090 North Bay Fires -- Monitorship $5,000 $1,178.40 

10111 Locate and Mark $3,000,000 $2,783,361.00 

10138 Triennial MBR Filing N/A $1,628.00 

10146 FPA Advice and Counsel $30,000 $28,622.40 

10252 Bankruptcy Employment $80,000 $88,654.60 

10261 Bankruptcy Administration $30,000 $11,802.40 

10295 Regulatory Matter $73,000 $127,458.50 

10309 FERC Interlock Advice $11,500 $11,050.90

TOTAL $4,386,500.00 $3,484,976.50

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3465-8 Filed: 08/08/19 Entered: 08/08/19 12:10:33 Page 1

of 1
#### The United States Vinegar Company, Plaintiff, v. Henry Spainer, Defendant.

Exceptions overruled, and judgment for the plaintiff ordered on the verdict, with costs. Opinion

*Per Curiam.*
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

November 30 , 2016

No. 04

- 14

- 00389

- CR

Paul Anthony GARCIA

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 5397

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

This appeal is on remand from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. The State filed its

supplemental brief on remand on October 27, 2016. Appellant’s brief on remand was due

November 28, 2016. Appellant has filed a motion to extend time to file his brief, asking for an

additional thirty days. After review, we GRANT appellant’s motion and ORDER appellant to

file his supplemental brief on re mand in this court on or before December 28, 2016. We remind

appellant that his supplement brief should address the issues in light of the decision rendered by

the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. We further remind appellant that this is a consolidated

m atter. Therefore, in the future, and pursuant to or consolidation order, any new filings,

including the brief, should include both cause numbers in a single document.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 30th day of November, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### HUGH *J.*ROGERS v. J. R. STEPHENS et al.

(Filed 18 December, *1929.)*

Deeds and Conveyances F e — In this case held: owner could recover from grantees in timber deed of his tenant-at-will for removal of timber.

Where the defendants entered upon lands of the plaintiff! and committed trespass in cutting and removing trees growing thereon under an unauthorized contract made with the plaintiff’s tenant-at-will, the defendants knowing of the tenancy and that their grantee did not claim the land adversely to the plaintiff, and no facts are shown to estop the plaintiff, he may maintain his action for damages, and a judgment of the trial court dismissing the action is erroneous.

Appeal by plaintiff from *McElroy, J.,*at May Term, 1929, of JacksoN.

Reversed.

Action to recover damages for trespass on tbe land of plaintiff, and for cutting and removing timber from said land.

From judgment dismissing tbe action at tbe close of tbe evidence, plaintiff appealed to *the*Supreme Court.

*Sutton & Stillwell for plaintiff.*

*W. R. Sherrill and, Alley & Alley, for defendants.*

Pee Oukiam.

Tbe evidence tends to show that plaintiff is tbe owner of five-sixths undivided interest in tbe land described in tbe complaint; that tbe defendants, J. R. Stephens and *W.*M. Ingram, entered upon said land during tbe months of June, July and August, 1928, and cut *133and removed from said land timber trees, worth at least several hundred dollars; and that said defendants entered upon said land and cut and removed said timber trees under ai contract with the defendant, Erma Rogers.

The evidence tended further to show that the defendant, Erma Rogers, was in possession of the land as the tenant-at-will of plaintiff and those under whom he claims, and that her codefendants knew when they entered into the contract with her and paid her for said timber trees, that she did not claim the land adversely to plaintiff. There was no evidence tending to show that plaintiff or those under whom he claims authorized Mrs. Erma Rogers to sell the timber on said land, as contended by her codefendants.

There was error in allowing the motion of defendants, J. R. Stephens and *W.*M. Ingram, for judgment as of nonsuit. *White*v. *Fox,*125 N. C., 544, 34 S. E., 645, is not an authority in support of said motion. No facts are shown by the evidence upon which plaintiff is estopped as the true owner of the land from maintaining this action to recover damages resulting from the trespass of the defendants, in wrongfully entering upon said land and without authority cutting and removing timber trees therefrom.

The defendant, Mrs. Erma Rogers, filed no answer to the complaint; plaintiff is not demanding judgment against her.

The judgment dismissing the action against the defendants, J. R. Stephens and *W.*M. Ingram, is

Reversed.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 105 (Wednesday, June 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 30873]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13191]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>12181 and <greek-i>12182]


South Dakota Disaster Number SD-00031

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION:  Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of South Dakota 
(FEMA-1915-DR), dated 05/13/2010.
    Incident: Flooding.
    Incident Period: 03/10/2010 and continuing.
    Effective Date: 05/24/2010.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 07/12/2010.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 02/14/2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of South 
Dakota, dated 05/13/2010, is hereby amended to include the following 
areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

Primary Counties: Moody.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-13191 Filed 6-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit B 

Exhibit B page 1 of 58

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2232-2 Filed: 05/28/19 Entered: 05/28/19 08:29:01 Page 1

of 25
Exhibit B page 2 of 58

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2232-2 Filed: 05/28/19 Entered: 05/28/19 08:29:01 Page 2

of 25
Exhibit B page 3 of 58

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2232-2 Filed: 05/28/19 Entered: 05/28/19 08:29:01 Page 3

of 25
Exhibit B page 4 of 58

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2232-2 Filed: 05/28/19 Entered: 05/28/19 08:29:01 Page 4

of 25
Exhibit B page 5 of 58

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2232-2 Filed: 05/28/19 Entered: 05/28/19 08:29:01 Page 5

of 25
Exhibit B page 6 of 58

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2232-2 Filed: 05/28/19 Entered: 05/28/19 08:29:01 Page 6

of 25
Exhibit B page 7 of 58

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2232-2 Filed: 05/28/19 Entered: 05/28/19 08:29:01 Page 7

of 25
Exhibit B page 8 of 58

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2232-2 Filed: 05/28/19 Entered: 05/28/19 08:29:01 Page 8

of 25
Exhibit B page 9 of 58

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2232-2 Filed: 05/28/19 Entered: 05/28/19 08:29:01 Page 9

of 25
Exhibit B page 10 of 58

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2232-2 Filed: 05/28/19 Entered: 05/28/19 08:29:01 Page 10

of 25
Exhibit B page 11 of 58

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2232-2 Filed: 05/28/19 Entered: 05/28/19 08:29:01 Page 11

of 25
Exhibit B page 12 of 58

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2232-2 Filed: 05/28/19 Entered: 05/28/19 08:29:01 Page 12

of 25
Exhibit B page 13 of 58

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2232-2 Filed: 05/28/19 Entered: 05/28/19 08:29:01 Page 13

of 25
Exhibit B page 14 of 58

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2232-2 Filed: 05/28/19 Entered: 05/28/19 08:29:01 Page 14

of 25
Exhibit B page 15 of 58

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2232-2 Filed: 05/28/19 Entered: 05/28/19 08:29:01 Page 15

of 25
Exhibit B page 16 of 58

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2232-2 Filed: 05/28/19 Entered: 05/28/19 08:29:01 Page 16

of 25
Exhibit B page 17 of 58

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2232-2 Filed: 05/28/19 Entered: 05/28/19 08:29:01 Page 17

of 25
Exhibit B page 18 of 58

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2232-2 Filed: 05/28/19 Entered: 05/28/19 08:29:01 Page 18

of 25
Exhibit B page 19 of 58

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2232-2 Filed: 05/28/19 Entered: 05/28/19 08:29:01 Page 19

of 25
Exhibit B page 20 of 58

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2232-2 Filed: 05/28/19 Entered: 05/28/19 08:29:01 Page 20

of 25
Exhibit B page 21 of 58

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2232-2 Filed: 05/28/19 Entered: 05/28/19 08:29:01 Page 21

of 25
Exhibit B page 22 of 58

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2232-2 Filed: 05/28/19 Entered: 05/28/19 08:29:01 Page 22

of 25
Exhibit B page 23 of 58

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2232-2 Filed: 05/28/19 Entered: 05/28/19 08:29:01 Page 23

of 25
Exhibit B page 24 of 58

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2232-2 Filed: 05/28/19 Entered: 05/28/19 08:29:01 Page 24

of 25
Exhibit B page 25 of 58

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2232-2 Filed: 05/28/19 Entered: 05/28/19 08:29:01 Page 25

of 25
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

EL PASO COMMUNITY COLLEGE 

DISTRICT,

 Appellant,

v.

ROSA GONZALEZ,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-13-00258-CV

Appeal from the

243rd District Court 

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC#2008-3813)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal, and 

concludes the motion should be granted and the appeal should be dismissed, in accordance with 

the opinion of this Court. We therefore dismiss the appeal. Cost are taxed against Appellant. 

See TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1(d). This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2014.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
1

Filed 6/9/21 P. v. Trachy CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Tehama)

----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

KATRINA CAY TRACHY,

Defendant and Appellant.

C092698

(Super. Ct. No. NCR96764)

In 2016, defendant pled guilty to second degree commercial burglary (Pen. Code, 

§ 459) in case No. NCR95451 and felony child abuse (Pen. Code, § 273a, subd. (a)) in 

case No. NCR96764 for a stipulated sentence of five years’ probation with 210 days in 

county jail and 80 hours of community service. Defendant was also advised she faced a 

maximum potential exposure of six years eight months. In accordance with the plea, the 

trial court granted her five years’ probation. 

Approximately seven months later, defendant admitted violating probation. The 

trial court reinstated her on probation. Defendant admitted a second probation violation 
2

in 2020. The trial court revoked probation and sentenced her to the midterm of four years 

in state prison with 432 days of presentence custody credits. 

The trial court denied defendant’s request for a certificate of probable cause. 

DISCUSSION

Appointed counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts and procedural 

history of the case and requests this court to review the record to determine whether there 

are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant 

was advised by counsel of her right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days from the 

date the opening brief was filed. More than 30 days have elapsed, and defendant has not 

filed a supplemental brief.

Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error 

that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

/s/ 

Robie, Acting P. J.

We concur:

/s/ 

Murray, J.

/s/ 

Duarte, J.
#### William L. Hunt, Respondent, v. The Buffalo, N. Y. and P. R. R. Co., Appellant.

— Judgment affirmed. Opinion by

Bradley, J.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

____________________________________

) 

LUCAS CALIXTO, et al., ) 

) 

Plaintiffs, ) 

) 

v. ) Civil Action No. 18-1551 (PLF)

) 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT ) 

OF THE ARMY, et al., ) 

) 

Defendants. ) 

____________________________________) 

ORDER

For the reasons stated in the Opinion issued this same day, it is hereby 

ORDERED that plaintiffs’ Motion [Dkt. No. 179] for Leave to File Third 

Amended Complaint is GRANTED; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs shall file their third amended complaint on 

or before June 11, 2021. 

SO ORDERED.

 PAUL L. FRIEDMAN

 United States District Judge

DATE: June 3, 2021 

/s/
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5298 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5298

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt student workers 
 for purposes of determining a higher education institution's employer 
                   health care shared responsibility.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 30, 2014

  Mr. Turner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt student workers 
 for purposes of determining a higher education institution's employer 
                   health care shared responsibility.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Student Job Protection Act of 
2014''.

SEC. 2. STUDENT WORKERS EXEMPTED FROM DETERMINATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION 
              INSTITUTION'S EMPLOYER HEALTH CARE SHARED RESPONSIBILITY.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (c) of section 4980H of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by redesignating paragraphs (5), (6), 
and (7) as paragraphs (6), (7), and (8), respectively, and by inserting 
after paragraph (4) the following new paragraph:
            ``(5) Exception for student workers.--
                    ``(A) In general.--Services rendered as a student 
                worker to an eligible educational institution (as 
                defined in section 25A(f)(2)) shall not be taken into 
                account under this section as service provided by an 
                employee.
                    ``(B) Student worker.--For purposes of this 
                paragraph, the term `student worker' means, with 
                respect to any eligible educational institution (as so 
                defined), any individual who--
                            ``(i) is employed by such institution, and
                            ``(ii) is a student enrolled at the 
                        institution and whose academic activity is 
                        consistent with the normal full time work load 
                        as determined by the institution for the course 
                        of study the individual is pursuing.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to months beginning after December 31, 2013.
                                 <all>
```
----

|   | /s/ Westley V. Thompson                                       |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Westley V. Thompson                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|   | President, SLF U.S.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|   | (principal executive officer)                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |

----
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Phoenix International Ventures, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zahir Teja, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Phoenix International Ventures, Inc. and will be retained by Phoenix International Ventures, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




May 16, 2011
By:
/s/  Zahir TejaZahir TejaChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Ronald H. Friesen, principal financial officer of Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (U.S.) (the "Company"), hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Ronald H. FriesenRonald H. FriesenSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(principal financial officer)November 15, 2010