alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

**Exhibit      31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

|   | a) | designed                such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material                information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated                subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,                particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is                being                prepared; |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | b) | evaluated                the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures                as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report (the                "Evaluation Date"); and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | c) | presented                in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness                of the                disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of                the                Evaluation Date; |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | a) | all                significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls                which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,                process,                summarize and report financial data and have identified for the                registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls;                and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | b) | any                fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other                employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal                controls; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                J. E. Corrigan,Jr.  |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Chief                Financial Officer |

----
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 178 Filed: 01/31/19 Entered: 01/31/19 09:43:36 Page 1 of 3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 178 Filed: 01/31/19 Entered: 01/31/19 09:43:36 Page 2 of 3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 178 Filed: 01/31/19 Entered: 01/31/19 09:43:36 Page 3 of 3
#### Howland and others, Respondents, v. Dewey, Appellant.

Ordered, that the memorandum of decision made at the last term be set aside, and that the judgment herein be modified by inserting after the words or any part thereof,” the words “ the following is a description of the mortgaged premises,” the words “ but this judgment is not to affect the rights of the defendant Mary D. S. Dewey, under her lease.” Neither party to have costs of this appeal from said judgment or of this motion. The motion for reargument denied, without costs.
Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

I, Edwin F. Heinen, Chief Financial Officer of Glowpoint, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)

The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |     |                        
|------------------------ | --- | -----------------------
|Date:  November 12, 2008 | By: | /s/ EDWIN F. HEINEN    
|                         |     | Edwin F. Heinen        
|                         |     | Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Glowpoint, Inc. and will be retained by Glowpoint, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
A96A1541.

#### COLLINS v. TRANAKOS.

(474 SE2d 622)

Johnson, Judge.

Marcus E. Collins, Sr., Commissioner of the Georgia Department of Revenue, appeals from the trial court’s denial of his request for disbursement of funds, which had been paid into the registry of the court by Metropolitan Atlanta Olympic Games Authority (MAOGA) following the condemnation of property owned by Arthur R Tranakos. Collins claims the funds are subject to a fi. fa.1 in favor of the state for delinquent taxes. In denying the tax commissioner’s request for disbursement, the trial judge concluded: “The second assessment was not filed on the execution docket within seven years from the date that it became due.”

OCGA § 48-3-21 provides that all state tax executions shall be enforced within seven years from the date of issue or “[t]he time of the last entry upon the tax execution by the officer authorized to execute and return the execution if the execution and entry are properly entered or reentered upon the execution docket or books in which executions issued on judgments and entries on executions issued on judgments are required to be entered or reentered.” OCGA § 48-3-21 (2). The fi. fa. was originally issued on April 20, 1981 and, contrary to the date recited in the trial court’s order, recorded on May 14, 1981. It was rerecorded on January 20, 1988, and again on October 18, 1993. We see nothing in the record to support the trial court’s conclusion that this assessment was not filed on the execution docket within seven years from the date that it became due, and that it has lapsed or become dormant. The Supreme Court has held that public records are presumed to be correct and are not subject to collateral attack. *Pope v. U. S. Fidelity &c. Co.,*200 Ga. 69, 74 (1) (35 SE2d 899) (1945). The trial court’s denial of the tax commissioner’s motion for *486disbursement of funds was error.

Decided July 9, 1996

Reconsideration dismissed August 14, 1996.

*Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, Daniel M. Formby, Deputy Attorney General, ^Narren R. Calvert, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Sheri L. Smith, Assistant Attorney General,*for appellant.

Arthur R Tranakos, *pro se.*

*Judgment reversed.*

*McMurray, P. J., and Ruffin, J., concur.*

1

 There were originally two fi. fas. The state concedes that one lapsed after seven years. This appeal only concerns the second fi. fa., ST-81-734B, in the principal amount of $7,132.60.
----

|  | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 20-F of Cellcom Israel Ltd; and |
|--|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|--|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Nir Sztern                    |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------|--------|
|   | Nir SzternChief Executive Officer |   |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5207 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5207

 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource 
study to determine the suitability and feasibility of establishing the 
 John P. Parker House in Ripley, Ohio, as a unit of the National Park 
                                System.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 25, 2014

 Mrs. Beatty (for herself, Ms. Kaptur, and Mr. Stivers) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource 
study to determine the suitability and feasibility of establishing the 
 John P. Parker House in Ripley, Ohio, as a unit of the National Park 
                                System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``John P. Parker House Study Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of the Interior.
            (2) Study area.--The term ``study area'' means the John P. 
        Parker House in Ripley, Ohio, which was recognized as a 
        National Historic Landmark in 1997.

SEC. 3. SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY OF JOHN P. PARKER HOUSE.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a special resource study of 
the study area to determine the suitability and feasibility of 
establishing the John P. Parker House in Ripley, Ohio, as a unit of the 
National Park System.
    (b) Study Requirements.--The Secretary shall conduct the study in 
accordance with section 8 of the National Park System General 
Authorities Act (16 U.S.C. 1a-5).
    (c) Report.--Not later than 3 years after the date on which funds 
are made available to carry out this Act, the Secretary shall submit to 
the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives and 
the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate a report 
that describes--
            (1) the results of the study; and
            (2) any recommendations of the Secretary.
                                 <all>
```
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4130 Filed: 10/03/19 Entered: 10/04/19 12:41:10 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4130 Filed: 10/03/19 Entered: 10/04/19 12:41:10 Page 2 of

2
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION

                  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
    (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
    States Code)

        Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company, a
Colorado corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's
knowledge, that:

        The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2003 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:    November 13, 2003 /s/ William T. McCallum
                            William T. McCallum
                            President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated:    November 13, 2003 /s/ Mitchell T.G. Graye
                            Mitchell T.G. Graye
                            Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

        The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed
as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Hannah Crine, Appellant, v. Herman Bornemann, Respondent.

Order modified, as directed in opinion, without costs. Opinion

*Per Curiam.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
HCW Pension Real Estate Fund Limited Partnership 1998 Second Quarter 10-QSB
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000745538
<NAME> HCW PENSION REAL ESTATE FUND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998   
<CASH>                                           1,138
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      484
<ALLOWANCES>                                        16
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          15,535
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,216)   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,018   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0     
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,341    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,018    
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,395    
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,437    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 196    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (42)     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.61)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

**WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK **

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATEANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

            I, H. John Berens, an authorized officer of Washington Mutual Bank (the “Servicer”), do hereby certify to WaMu AssetAcceptance Corp. (the “Depositor”), pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of January 1, 2007 (as amended, the “Servicing Agreement”) by and between the Depositor, the Servicer, LaSalle Bank, NationalAssociation, as Trustee, and Christiana Bank & Trust Company, as Delaware Trustee,  the following with respect to Washington Mutual Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates WMALT Series 2007-OA1 Trustfor the 2007 fiscal year (the “Relevant Year”):

1.  A review of the activities of the Servicer during the Relevant Year and of performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under mysupervision.

2.  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in allmaterial respects throughout the Relevant Year, except that, prepayment fees due to investors were calculated incorrectly on certain loans with deferred interest, resulting in a shortfall in the distributions to those investors. The amount due as a result of thesemiscalculations will be delivered to the applicable Trustee for distribution once analysis of this matter has been completed and the amounts have been determined. Processes and procedures have been implemented and are currently being validated to provide for moreaccurate calculation of prepayment fees.

 

Dated as of March 1, 2008.

 
| /s/ H. John Berens Name:  H. John Berens Title:    Senior Vice President |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          30,186
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,253
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    115,662
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           3,375
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             3,371
<LOANS>                                        860,131
<ALLOWANCE>                                     12,619
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,027,239
<DEPOSITS>                                     826,999
<SHORT-TERM>                                    68,544
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,436
<LONG-TERM>                                     52,034
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,646
<OTHER-SE>                                      61,580
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,027,239
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 53,063
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,897
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   542
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                59,502
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              25,952
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,171
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           28,331
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      498
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               1,008
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 20,577
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,877
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      16,877
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,043
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.04
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.96
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,419
<LOANS-PAST>                                       144
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     8
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  6,552
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                13,174
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,689
<RECOVERIES>                                       636
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               12,619
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            11,915
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            704


</TABLE>
#### Sophia McCarthy, Appellant, v. Moses B. Tice, as Administrator, etc, Respondent.

Judgment aud order affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Follett, J.
#### People ex rel. Robert Lee and Others v. The Village of College Point and Others.

Motion to resettle order denied.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BAKER 

&

HOSTETLER LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

Exhibit A

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4047-1 Filed: 10/01/19 Entered: 10/01/19 15:09:39 Page 1

of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BAKER 

&

HOSTETLER LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

COMMITTEE MEMBERS INCURRING EXPENSES FOR SERVICES RENDERED ON 

BEHALF OF THE TCC FROM APRIL 1, 2019 THROUGH AUGUST 31, 2019

Name Position Total Expenses Incurred

Karen M. Lockhart Chair $198.25

Karen K. Gowins Member $1,473.31

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4047-1 Filed: 10/01/19 Entered: 10/01/19 15:09:39 Page 2

of 2
#### EARL BUCHANAN, JR., Administrator of the Estate of LYNN BUCHANAN, Deceased, v. DICKERSON, INCORPORATED.

(Filed 27 September, 1950.)

Appeal by defendant from *Rousseau, J.,*7 June, 1950. From Buther-EORD.

Affirmed.

Tbis was an action to recover damages for tbe wrongful death of plaintiff’s intestate alleged to bave been caused by negligence on tbe part of tbe defendant while engaged in resurfacing a highway undef contract with tbe State Highway and Public Works Commission. It was alleged that tbe death of plaintiff’s intestate, who was a passenger in an automobile being driven over tbe highway, proximately resulted from defendant’s negligence.

Defendant in apt time moved to strike certain portions of tbe complaint. Tbe motion was allowed in part and in other particulars denied. Defendant excepted and appealed.

*Hamrick & Hamrick and Sidney L. Truesdale for plaintiff, appellee.*

*Smothers ■& Meekins for defendant, appellant.*

Per Curiam.

The defendant’s exception to the ruling of the court below is without merit. *Hinson v. Britt, ante,*379; *Hildebrand v. Tel. Co.,*216 N.C. 235, 4 S.E. 2d 439; *Hardy v. Dahl,*209 N.C. 746, 184 S.E. 480.

No new question is presented which requires elaboration. The judgment is

Affirmed.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with Amendment No. 1 tothe Annual Report of
Florham Consulting Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended
December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kellis Veach, Chief Financial Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Florham Consulting
Corp. and will be retained by Florham Consulting Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




/s/  Kellis
      VeachKellis
      VeachChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Accounting and Financial
Officer)





April 5,
2010