alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 43(c), Kenneth S. Apfel , Commissioner of

Social Security, is substituted for Shirley S. Chat er as the defendant in this action.

** This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### NOV 10 1997 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
SHEILA CONN,

Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KENNETH S. APFEL, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, *

Defendant-Appellee. No. 97-5029 (D.C. No. 95-CV-266-W) (N.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT **
Before KELLY, McKAY, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges. After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously to grant the parties’ request for a dec ision on the briefs without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The c ase is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.1 The parties consented to proceed before a magistrat e judge. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(c). -2- Claimant Sheila Conn appeals the district court’s o rder 1 affirming the Commissioner’s decision to deny her application forsocial security disability benefits. The Commissioner determined that Ms. Con n could perform sedentary work available in significant numbers in the local and national economies and, therefore, she is not disabled within the meaning o f the Social Security Act. Ms. Conn contends that the Commissioner failed to e valuate properly her nonexertional impairments and failed to consider ev idence submitted. We affirm. We review the Commissioner’s decision to determine whether the findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence basedon the entire record, and to ascertain whether he applied the correct legal stan dards. See Castellano v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs. , 26 F.3d 1027, 1028 (10th Cir. 1994). Substantial evidence is “‘such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.’” Soli z v. Chater , 82 F.3d 373, 375 (10th Cir. 1996) (quoting Richardson v. Perales , 402 U.S. 389, 401 (1971) (further quotation omitted)). “We closely examine the record as a whole to determine whether substantial evidence supports the [Commissioner’s] decision, and we fully consider the evidence that detracts fr om [his] decision.” Cruse v.-3-

United States Dep’t of Health & Human Servs. , 49 F.3d 614, 617 (10th Cir. 1995).We have carefully reviewed the record on appeal, as well as the briefs submitted by the parties. Applying the standards s et out above, we conclude for substantially the same reasons stated in the magistrate judge’s December 17, 1996 order, that substantial evidence supports the determination that Ms. Conn is not disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act. The judgment of the United States District Court fo r the Northern District of Oklahoma is AFFIRMED.

Entered for the Court
Monroe G. McKay Circuit Judge
Exhibit 13.1









The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Cellcom Israel Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.




Nir Sztern, the Chief Executive Officer and Yaacov Heen, the Chief Financial Officer of Cellcom Israel Ltd., each certifies that:




1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and




2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cellcom Israel Ltd.




Date: March 4, 2013




/s/ Nir SzternName:  Nir SzternChief Executive Officer









/s/ Yaacov HeenName:  Yaacov HeenChief Financial Officer
.,T-rORNE:Y GENERAI. July20,1971

Hon. J. W. Edgar Opinion No. M-908 Commissionerof Education Texas EducationAgency Re: Construction of House Bill 201 East Eleventh Street 803, House Bill 1062 and Austin, Texas 78701 Senate Bill 1008,Acts 62nd Leg., R.S. 1971, relating to salaries of assistant Dear Dr. Edgar: count,ysuperintendents.

Your request for an opinion asks the following question: "Does House Bill 1062,Acts 62nd Legislature, R.S. 1971, amending Section 17.52(a) of the Texas Education Code, appl h uniformly to all counties in thematter of sue not-to-exceed (1)annual salary of first assistant county superintendents and (2) aggregate annual salaries of all assistant to such county superintendents?" House Bill 803,Acts 62nd Leg., R.S. 1971, fixes the salariesof assistant county school superintendents in counties having a population according to the last preceding federal census of more than 260,000but less than 325,000 inhabitants. House Bill 802 passed the Legislature on May 6, 1971.

Senate Bill 1008,Acts 62nd Leg., R.S. 1971, also fixes the compensation of assistant county school superintendents. Senate Bill 1008 passed the LegislatureMay 20, 1971.

House Bill 1062, Acts 62nd Leg., R.S. 1971, fixes the salariesof all assistant county school superintendents in the State. House Bill 1062 passed the LegislatureMay 26, 1971.

Therefore House Bill 1062 is the latest expression of the Legislaturerelating to the compensation of assistant county superintendentsand will control over the provisions of House Bill 803 and Senate Bill 1008. Attorney General's Opinion M-497 (1969);Attorney General's OpinionV-990 (1950)aff'd by Ex parte De Jesus de la 0, 227 S.W.Zd 212 (Tex.Crim.1950); Townsendv. Terrell, 118 Tex. 463, 16 S.W.Zd 1063 (1929);Wright V.

-4421-Dr. J. W. Edgar, page 2 (M-908)

Broeter, 145 Tex. 142, 196 S.W.2d 82 (1946);Stevensv. State, 159. 503 (Tex.Crim.1913); Parshallv. State,,138 S.W. 759 (Tex.Crim.1911).

You are accordingly advised that the provisions of House Bill 1062 amending Section 17.52(a) of the Texas Education Code apply uniformly to all counties and prescribe the maximum compensation thatmay be paid assistant county superintendents. SUMMARY House Bill 1062 amending Section 17.52(a) of the Texas Education Code appliesuniformly. to all counties and prescribes the maximum compensation thatmay be paid assistant county school superintendents,and controls over the provisions of House Bill 803 and Senate Bill 1008,Acts 62nd Leg., R.S. 1971. (7 Very truly yoprs,

Preparedby John Reeves Assistant Attorney General APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE Kerns Taylor, Chairman W. E. Allen, Co-Chairman James McCoy Linward Shivers Brandon Bickett A. J. Gallerano MEADE F. GRIFFIN Staff Legal Assistant ALFRED WALKER ExecutiveAssistant NOLA WHITE FirstAssistant -4422-
Exhibit 32.2

                                SAVWATT USA, INC.
                             A Delaware Corporation
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Annual Report of SavWatt USA, Inc.  ("Company")  on Form
10-K for the year ended  December 31,  2010,  as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Michael Haug,  Chief
Financial  Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: April 15, 2011                   /s/ Michael Haug
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                    By:  Michael Haug
                                    Its: Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,548
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,413
<ALLOWANCES>                                       846
<INVENTORY>                                      5,391
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,138
<PP&E>                                          27,915
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,772
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,644
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,186
<BONDS>                                            987
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            51
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,090
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,644
<SALES>                                            626
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,144
<CGS>                                               99
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,601
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   394
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  33
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (252)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (252)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (252)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF OUR CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, Joseph Meuse, certify that:



1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ALL STATE PROPERIES HOLDINGS, INC.;



2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



/s/ Joseph Meuse

------------------------------

Joseph Meuse

President and Chief Executive Officer

February 13, 2009
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3907 Filed: 09/17/19 Entered: 09/17/19 11:12:54 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3907 Filed: 09/17/19 Entered: 09/17/19 11:12:54 Page 2 of

2
Exhibit 32(ii)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Monroe Bancorp (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gordon M. Dyott, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


/s/ Gordon M. Dyott
-------------------
Gordon M. Dyott
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
August 13, 2004


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed for any other purpose.
EXHIBIT B 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4215-2 Filed: 10/16/19 Entered: 10/16/19 08:35:03 Page 1

of 2
COMPENSATION BY WORK TASK CODE FOR 

SERVICES RENDERED BY KELLER & BENVENUTTI LLP 

AUGUST 1, 2019 THROUGH AUGUST 30, 2019 

TASK 

CODE DESCRIPTION HOURS AMOUNT 

002 Omnibus & Miscellaneous Court Appearances 157.5 $50,585 

004 General Case Administration 19.5 $9,465 

005 Automatic Stay Proceedings 84.4 $57,090 

006 Initial Debtor Interview, Meeting of Creditors, Creditor Inquiries 3.5 $2,700 

007 Professional Retention and Compensation – Keller & Benvenutti 15.1 $7,820 

008 Professional Retention and Compensation – Other Professionals 15.7 $8,525 

009 Financing and Cash Collateral .3 $240 

014 Employee Matters 3.9 $1,960 

015 Supplier Issues 5.3 $2,520 

017 Sale or Use of Property – Motions 4.6 $2,205 

018 Executory Contract Issues 21.1 $10,990 

021 Plan – Advice, Strategy and Negotiation 13.1 $8,905 

025 FERC Adversary Proceeding .1 $80 

026 Wildfire Litigation 15.2 $10,825 

027 Claims Review 2.8 $1,750 

028 Claim Disputes and Resolution 1.8 $1,080 

032 USDC Probation Compliance 4.3 $2,600 

034 Third Party Injunction Action (PERA) 5.6 $2,880 

036 Miscellaneous Litigation Issues and Advice 23.4 $12,730 

037 Appeals 1.7 $1,360 

TOTAL 398.9 $196,310 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4215-2 Filed: 10/16/19 Entered: 10/16/19 08:35:03 Page 2

of 2
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION**




In
      connection with the periodic report of Glowpoint, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Michael Brandofino, Chief Executive
      Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for
      purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that
      to the best of my knowledge:




1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
      of
      and for the periods indicated.




This
      Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission.




Date:
      May
      11, 2006


/s/ Michael
              BrandofinoMichael
              BrandofinoChief
              Executive Officer
----

**EXHIBIT      32.1          **

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | */s/                Robert C. Salipante*     |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|   | Robert                C. Salipante           |
|   | President                                    |
|   | (principal                executive officer) |
|   | November                13, 2007             |

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of TransAct Energy Corp. a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the annual period ending December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Roderick C. Bartlett, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

 

*/s/ Roderick C Bartlett* 

Roderick C Bartlett

Chief Financial Officer 

Date: January 22, 2018
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Unizan Financial Corp.s (the
Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James H. Nicholson, Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------
|Date: August 9, 2004 |  | /s/ James H. Nicholson         
|                     |  | James H. Nicholson             
|                     |  | Executive Vice President, Chief
|                     |  | Operating Officer and Principal
|                     |  | Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*The Board of Supervisors of Chenango County, Appellants, v. The Board of State Assessors and Burr B. Andrews, as Supervisor of the Town of Norwich, Respondents.

—Determination of the board of State asse.-sors modified as stated in the opinion of Hardin, P. J. Order to be settled before him, and as so modified affirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements against appellants. Opinion by

Hardin, P. J.
Exhibit 31.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a),


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Todd Davis, certify that:


|   |                                                                         
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of LifeLock, Inc.; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.




Date:February 20, 2015/s/ Todd DavisTodd DavisChairman and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00206-CV

In the Interest of A.N. and J.N., Jr., 

Children

§

§

§

§

From the 323rd District Court

of Tarrant County (323-98825J-13)

November 6, 2014

Opinion by Justice Walker

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Sue Walker____________________

 Justice Sue Walker
#### Allen J. Arnold and Others, Appellants, v. James Fee and Another, Respondents

Memorandum of decision amended so as to read as follows: Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion of Rumsey, J., at Special Term, with leave to the plaintiffs to amend their complaint within twenty days on payment of the costs of the demurrer and of this appeal.
#### THE STATE, Appellant, v. LEN CHAMBERS.

Division Two,

November 23, 1909.

APPEAL BY STATE. The State is not entitled to an appeal from a judgment sustaining a plea in abatement to an indictment.

Appeal from Jasper Circuit Court. — Ho». *Henry L. Bright,*Judge.

Appeal dismissed.

*Elliott W. Major,*Attorney-General, and *John M. Atlcinson,*Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

BUBGESS, J.

This is an appeal by the- State from a judgment of the circuit court of Jasper county setting aside the indictment on a. plea in abatement thereto by the defendant.

The record is in all respects similar to those in the cases of State v. Craig, *ante,*p. 201, and State v. Firey, *ante,*p. 194, handed down at this delivery, and for the reasons therein given, the appeal of the State must be and is dismissed.

All concur.