alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Alexander M. Conway, Respondent, v. Edward O. Carpenter, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.—

Dykman, J.:

This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon a verdict in favor of the plaintiff after a trial at the Circuit, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial. The action has been tried three times with various results. On the first trial the complaint was dismissed, and upon the plaintiff’s appeal judgment was reversed, and a new trial was granted. The second trial of the action was had in March, 1894, when the plaintiff obtained a verdict for $2,500. Upon the defendant’s appeal to the General Term that judgment was reversed, and a new trial granted. The third trial or the action was had at the Westchester Circuit in September, 1894. A verdict was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, and judgment was thereupon entered, from which this appeal is taken. The plaintiff was a minister of the gospel, and while engaged in the performance of services in a church at Yonkers in March, 1882, it is alleged in the complaint that he v as violently seized and taken from the pulpit with force and violence, and was thrown upon his back and dragged from the vestibule of the church into one of the public streets of Yonkers, by order and direction of the defendant. Upon tho last trial, which resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff, the only question submitted to the jury was whether more force or violence was used against him than was necessary under the circumstancas, the jury being charged that the defendant had the right to cause the removal of the plaintiff from the church in which he was engaged in holding services at the time. The charge of the trial judge to the jury was within the ruleof law laid down by the General Term when the case was before it on the last occasion, and we are, therefore, concluded by the law as so laid down. The question of excessive force was plainly one for the jury. Whereas in this case there was testimony from which the jury mjght find that the force used was excessive, the question being thus properly submitted to the jury, and the verdict being in favor of the plaintiff, the rules of law applicable to the case having been heretofore settled, we find no cause for interference with the verdict, and the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Pratt, J., concurred; Dykman, not voting.
No. 17,919.

#### Raymond T. Romero, et al. *v.*People of The State of Colorado.

(304 P. [2d] 639)

Decided December 3, 1956.

Rehearing denied December 24, 1956.

Mr. Francis P. O’Neil, for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General, Mr. Frank E. Hickey, Deputy, Mr. Norman H. Comstock, Assistant, for defendant in error.

*En Banc.*

Mr. Justice Moore

delivered the opinion of the Court.

We will herein refer to plaintiffs in error as defendants.

Defendants were convicted on counts of an information which charged the offenses of grand larceny and conspiracy to commit grand larceny. After motion for a new trial was heard and denied, judgment was en*343tered and defendants were sentenced to terms in the Colorado state penitentiary. They seek reversal of the judgment by writ of error.

Upon the record as submitted there is but one question to be determined. It is argued that there is fatal variance between the allegations of the information and the proof, in that the property stolen was alleged to be that of Westric Battery Company, whereas the evidence established ownership of some of the property in the I.C.X. Truck Line, and other items in one Snyder.

It was alleged in the information that the stolen property consisted of “eight automobile batteries.” The evidence conclusively established that the batteries in question were in the exclusive possession of Westric Battery Company for the purpose of being repaired, and that they had been delivered to that company for that purpose by the title owners.

In 32 Am. Jur., § 113, P. 1025, it is said:

“It is well settled that the ownership [in larceny cases] may be laid either in the real owner or in the person in whose possession the property was at the time of the theft. * * *”

See also 52 C.J.S. § 81, p. 886. The above-quoted rule has been followed in this jurisdiction. *Sloan v. People,*65 Colo. 456, 176 Pac. 481; *Collins v. People,*69 Colo. 343, 193 Pac. 634; *Collins v. People,*69 Colo. 353, 195 Pac. 525; *Nelson v. People,*111 Colo. 434, 142 P. (2d) 388.

There is no merit in the contention of counsel for defendants that there is insufficient evidence of value of the property to sustain a conviction of grand larceny. The guilt of defendants is abundantly supportd by the evidence.

The judgment is affirmed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 

767 Fifth Avenue 

New York, NY 10153-0119

EXHIBIT B 

COMPENSATION BY WORK TASK CODE FOR 

SERVICES RENDERED BY WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 

FOR THE PERIOD JULY 1, 2019 THROUGH JULY 31, 2019 

TASK 

CODE DESCRIPTION HOURS AMOUNT 

001 Administrative Expense Claims 13.90 $7,784.00 

002 Asset Sales/363 Sales 6.00 $3,925.50 

003 Automatic Stay 224.60 $192,036.00 

004 Bankruptcy Litigation 467.30 $401,440.50 

005 Bar Date Motion/Claims Reconciliation/Claim Reconciliation Issue 115.00 $109,337.00 

006 Case Administration (docket updates, WIP and calendar) 27.90 $18,838.50 

008 Chapter 11 Plan/Plan Confirmation 421.50 $419,690.00 

009 Communications with Client 16.20 $14,523.00 

010 Corporate Governance and Board Issues 104.60 $124,910.00 

011 Customer, Supplier and Vendor Issues 9.30 $8,575.50 

013 Disclosure Statement 120.50 $88,000.50 

014 Employee Issues 259.10 $238,116.00 

016 Exclusivity 515.20 $523,382.50 

017 Executory Contracts/Lease Issues 175.50 $134,758.00 

018 General Case Strategy(includes calls with client and team calls) 146.70 $139,105.00 

019 Hearings and Court Matters 72.40 $89,893.00 

020 Legislative Issues/Inverse Reform 28.80 $33,167.00 

022 Non-Working Travel 136.60 $82,751.50 

023 FERC Adversary Proceeding 6.20 $5,975.50 

024 Reclamation/503(b)(9) 73.30 $48,365.50 

025 Regulatory Issues including CPUC and FERC 14.30 $17,780.00 

026 Retention/Billing/Fee Applications: WGM 109.30 $81,310.50 

027 Retention/Fee Application: Ordinary Course Professionals 2.30 $1,256.00 

028 Retention/Fee Application: Other Professionals 41.10 $28,228.50

029 Schedules/Statement of Financial Affairs 2.10 $2,257.50 

030 Tax Issues 205.00 $238,251.00 

031 U.S. Trustee issues/ meetings/ communications/monthly operating 0.10 $107.50 

032 Unsecured Creditor Issues/ Communications/Meetings 4.20 $4,922.50 

035 Real Estate and Real Property Issues 28.00 $35,660.50 

036 Tort Claimants Committee, including Wildfire Claimants 169.60 $142,117.50 

037 Insurance Issues 66.10 $58,490.50 

Total: 3,582.70 $3,294,956.50 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4218-2 Filed: 10/16/19 Entered: 10/16/19 09:48:45 Page 1

of 1
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4126 Filed: 10/03/19 Entered: 10/04/19 12:24:18 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4126 Filed: 10/03/19 Entered: 10/04/19 12:24:18 Page 2 of

2
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 
 I, Daniel L. Westrope, certify that:
 
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of State Financial Services Corporation;
 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 4.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors  (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date: August 9, 2004
 
 /s/ Daniel L. Westrope
 
 
 Daniel L. Westrope
 Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION

-andPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY,

Debtors.

Case No, 19-30088 (DM)

Chapter 11

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

TRANSFER OF CLAIM OTHER THAN FOR SECURITY

A CLAIM HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS CASE or deemed filed under 11 U.S.C. §1111 (a). Transferee hereby gives notice 

pursuant to Rule 3001(e) (2), Fed. R. Bankr. P., of the transfer, other than for security, of the claim referenced in this notice.

CONTRARIAN FUNDS, LLC

Name of Transferee

Address for all Communications/Notices:

CONTRARIAN FUNDS, LLC

411 WEST PUTNAM AVE., SUITE 425

GREENWICH, CT 06830

ATTN: ALISA MUMOLA

Phone: 203-862-8211

Fax: 203-485-5910

Email: tradeclaimsgroup@contrariancapital.com

Address for all Payments/Distributions:

CONTRARIAN FUNDS, LLC

ATTN: 392426

500 ROSS ST 154-0455

PITTSBURGH, PA 15262

MCA CONNECT LLC

Name of Transferor

Name and Current Address of Transferor:

MCA CONNECT LLC

8055 E TUFTS AVE STE 1300

DENVER, CO 80237 

ATTN: MARK SWIHART

I declare under penalty of perjury that the information provided in this notice

is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

By:_______/s/ Alisa Mumola_________

 Transferee/Transferee’s Agent

Date: July 23, 2019

Penalty for making a false statement: Fine of up to $500,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years, or both. 18 U.S.C. §§ 152 & 3571.

Schedule/Claim No. Creditor Name Amount Debtor Case No.

Claim No. 3567 MCA Connect LLC $20,270.00 PG&E Corporation 19-30088

Claim No. 3620

amends 3567

MCA Connect LLC $20,270.00 Pacific Gas and Electric Company 19-30089

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3141 Filed: 07/23/19 Entered: 07/23/19 06:03:30 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3141 Filed: 07/23/19 Entered: 07/23/19 06:03:30 Page 2 of

2
EXHIBIT 32
                                   ----------

            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE & FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Intercell
International  Corporation  for  the quarter ended December 31, 2004, I, Paul H.
Metzinger,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of  Intercell  International Corporation,
hereby  certify  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  to  my  knowledge,  that:

     a.   such  Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-QSB  of  Intercell International
          Corporation  for  the  quarter ended December 31, 2004, fully complies
          with  the  requirements  of  section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
          Exchange Act of 1934; and

     b.   the  information  contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
          Intercell  International  Corporation  for  the quarter ended December
          31,  2004,  fairly  presents,  in all material respects, the financial
          condition  and  results  of  operations  of  Intercell  International
          Corporation.


                                        /s/Paul H. Metzinger
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Paul H. Metzinger, Chief
                                        Executive Officer




Date:  February  22,  2005


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Intercell International Corporation and will be retained by
Intercell International Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>
The Florida Bar

651 East Jefferson Street 

Tallahassee, FL 32399-2300

Joshua E. Doyle

Executive Director

850/561-5600

www.FLORIDABAR.org

 State of Florida )

 County of Leon ) In Re: 0600547

Elizabeth Ann Green

Baker & Hostetler LLP

PO Box 112

Orlando, FL 32802-0112

I CERTIFY THE FOLLOWING: 

I am the custodian of membership records of The Florida Bar. 

Membership records of The Florida Bar indicate that The Florida Bar member listed above was admitted to

practice law in the state of Florida on . October 16, 1986

The Florida Bar member above is an active member in good standing of The Florida Bar who is eligible to

practice law in the state of Florida.

Dated this day of , . 18th July 2019

Cynthia B. Jackson, CFO

Administration Division

The Florida Bar

PG:R10

CTM-50263

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3168-1 Filed: 07/24/19 Entered: 07/24/19 11:18:06 Page 1

of 1
Exhibit 11


                                         CityFed Financial Corp.
                          Statement Regarding the Computation of Per Share Loss

<TABLE>
                                                                         Three months ended
                                                                         ------------------
                                                                              March 31,
                                                                              ---------

                                                                         2004                2003
                                                                         ----                ----
 <S>                                                                <C>                   <C>
 Computation of Loss Per Share:

 Weighted average number of common shares
    outstanding                                                       28,716,134            18,716,134

 Loss applicable to common stock:(1)

   From continuing operations                                       $(2,217,000)          $(2,109,000)
   From discontinued operations                                                -                11,000
                                                                    ------------          ------------
   Net loss                                                         $(2,217,000)          $(2,098,000)
                                                                    ============          ============

 Basic and diluted loss per common share:

   From continuing operations                                           $ (0.08)              $ (0.11)
   From discontinues operations                                           (0.00)                (0.00)
                                                                        --------              --------
   Net loss                                                             $ (0.08)              $ (0.11)
                                                                        ========              ========

</TABLE>





------------------------------
1 Losses  applicable to Common Stock includes  unpaid  preferred stock dividends
for the three months  ended March 31, 2004 and 2003 in the amount of  $2,278,000
and $2,158,000, respectively.


                                       12
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         413,811
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,173
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               446,984
<PP&E>                                      11,015,288
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,224,041
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,238,231
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          347,892
<BONDS>                                      5,282,548
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,607,791
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,238,231
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               401,002
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               291,484
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             109,992
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (474)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (474)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (474)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 107 (Friday, June 4, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31759-31760]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13352]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service

Madera County Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Madera County Resource Advisory Committee will be meeting 
in North Fork, California on June 16th and on July 21st. The purpose of 
these meetings will be to make decisions on how to accept and review 
project proposals for the next funding cycle as authorized under the 
Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. 
L. 110-343) for expenditure of Payments to States Fresno County Title 
II funds.

[[Page 31760]]

DATES: The meetings will be held on January 13, 2010 from 6 p.m. to 
8:30 p.m. in Prather, CA and January 27, 2010 from 6 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. 
in Clovis, CA.

ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held at the Bass Lake Ranger District, 
57003 Road 225, North Fork, California 93643. Send written comments to 
Julie Roberts, Madera County Resource Advisory Committee Coordinator, 
c/o Sierra National Forest, Bass Lake Ranger District, at the above 
address, or electronically to jarobertsfs.fed.us.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie Roberts, Madera County Resource 
Advisory Committee Coordinator, (559) 877-2218 ext. 3159.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meetings are open to the public. 
Committee discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee 
members. However, persons who wish to bring Payments to States Madera 
County Title II project matters to the attention of the Committee may 
file written statements with the Committee staff before or after the 
meetings. Agenda items to be covered include: (1) Discuss and agree on 
general operating procedures (2) elect a RAC Chair, (3) review past 
proposals and (4) discuss conditions and parameters for accepting 
future proposals.

    Dated: May 24, 2010.
Dave Martin,
District Ranger.
[FR Doc. 2010-13352 Filed 6-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
```
#### William Steven and another, Appellants, v. James H. Hughes, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with but one argument fee in this court to be taxed.

Opinion by

Smith, P. J.
Exhibit
32.2
  SECTION
906 CERTIFICATION
  I, Edwin
F. Heinen, Chief Financial Officer of Glowpoint, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as created pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
  1)           The
accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
March 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and
  2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date: May
13, 2009
 /s/ Edwin F. Heinen
                  Edwin
      F. Heinen
                  Chief
      Financial Officer
 
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to Glowpoint, Inc. and will be retained by Glowpoint, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.