alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### JOHN B. MILLER, Appellant, *v.*THE OSWEGO AND ONONDAGA INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

*Policy of insurance*— *condition in, against change of occupation*— *when it mil not be avoided by a change of tenants.*

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant, entered upon a nonsuit directed at the circuit.

The action was brought to recover upon a policy of insurance against fire issued by the defendant.

The court at General Term, after overruling certain defences interposed by the company, said : “ Still another defence is this : The policy describes the building as occupied on the first floor as a dry goods and hardware store ; second story, storage, cigar manufactory and manufacture of tinware ; third story, as a printing office. The policy contains a clause that ‘if any change *526whatever shall take place in. the situation, occupation, use or condition of the premises insured, or the neighboring buildings, without the consent of the company indorsed thereon,’ the policy shall be void. It was proved that afterwards a committee, of whom one of the defendant’s agents was a member, rented a part of the second floor for a Tilden and Hendricks club room. No other evidence was given as to the use made of this part of the second floor, or the purposes to which the occupants put it. Whether the Tilden and Hendricks club used it for storage, or how they used it, does not appear. A condition of this kind, forfeiting the rights of the insured for an act which does not injure the insurer, ought not to bo extended in its meaning. ‘ It must be construed in view of the situation and character of the property insured and the contingencies affecting its use.’ ( *Whitney*v. *Blade River Ins. Co.,*72 N. Y., 118.) The description in that policy showed generally that the first floor was occupied by the insured himself as a Store ; that the other stores were occupied by tenants for manufactures and the like. Now, we cannot say, as a matter of law, that a change of tenants, even if the new tenant was a Tilden and Hendricks club, was such a change in the use and occupation of fhe building as, of itself, to forfeit the policy. The defendant must tse supposed to have had some reasonable meaning in this clause, tad not to have intended it as a mere trap to catch the plaintiff f, during the time of the policy (expiring in October), a new tenant should come in. The object of the clause was to protect *:*tgainst increased risk ; and the change referred to must, therefore, at least be one which is substantial.”

*Spriggs*& *Mathews,*for the appellant. *C. W. Avery,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

LearNed, P. J.

Present — LearNed, P. J., BoardmaN and Follett, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event.
.^

**OFFICE OF**  **THE AR**  **’ ORNEY**  **QENLRAL OF**  **TCXAE AUSTIN** 

**Honorable** 

### Charloy Stat0 **Treaauru Aurtln,**  

### Texas Dear Sir: Lookhut

**._ .**  **. .,**  **:w0 w0**  **in** **rwm~*~or** 

### opiliion

upon tlia 

### iollwln& qu*
reatsd: in. Natf'o mold **br** 

### the Uni tad Civil **‘ Statute8**  l dut y **or** 

## investing

ouund Dollarr

**bond8** l 8 ue 8 u t h o rl ra d f or invrmt mont of t he 

### Pamnont School JUIM.~ ?i!ho olaam 

### of **meourltiea** 

### autborlroa for 

### intmmtmontof perrrmnent

public irea school fund8 16 

### ioUnd i?~ Artiola 9669 Or 

### Vunoa*r AnnotatedCivil **Statutes** 

### which reads as follows:.



### Eonoabla Gharloy bokhart, Pago 8

‘Tbm State 

### Board Cc **Bducation** 

### la 6utborlred end &owarod to lovaat~ the parmanont pub110 

### .frao6obool fund6 of tba **Stats** in bonds or the Unltad States ~haraor , and tha Bt6tm of Texea, or any ooun’ty

ha indapandsnt or oomon school dlatrlota, 

### road precincts,.dralnage, lrrIgatIon, nevl and f ation 

### and laraa diatrlot6 in this state, ho bonds of 

### inoorpordted oltlea and towns, ga;bll 

### tiona and pledges oC the University ot .* f&deraoorlng **ours)** The National Defense Bondo **a5** to which you inquire **are** l **dlraot** oblig6tlon 

### oi thm United Statma **Oovarnment,** 

### and, therefore, 

### lq our oplnlon 

### l uoh.bonda **undar** the authority of 

### Art&o10 9669 ; . *a9 .+=Jw*, "ir legally bo pmroheaedem ti **intrartment** 

### for

. . 

### -. .aJompwry ?Qilaed : ',. ;. 1, Talimtlug

that 'ho ip~olug r8tlar4otorlly amwar yo u r i u q u l r 7, %a lo 

### Youra vary truly **APPlfOVlt~**

### JVLY‘lB';

'l?il'.' ," ATTd&Fi 

### Cl!Nl%AL **OF** 

### T&AS. "- '

. . . /a/ Orormr Sallua FIRST ASSISTABT ATTO8mlY

fxmnut
..,, 6, rod

AIppR[)*ID~OpfMO8

COIlMI%‘l’B8

n 8.t.8. CHAf-
Exhibit
13.1







The certification
set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Cellcom Israel Ltd. for the year ended
December 31, 2016 (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.



Nir Sztern,
the Chief Executive Officer and Shlomi Fruhling, the Chief Financial Officer of Cellcom Israel Ltd., each certifies that:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with
                                         the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the
                                         Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
                                         of operations of Cellcom Israel Ltd.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







Date: March 20, 2017



| | /s/ Nir Sztern         
| | -----------------------
| | Name:	Nir Sztern       
| | Chief Executive Officer





| | /s/ Shlomi Fruhling    
| | -----------------------
| | Name:	Shlomi Fruhling  
| | Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,134
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,940
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,465
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,248
<PP&E>                                          49,011
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,397
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,247
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,489
<BONDS>                                         17,643
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,089
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,344
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    34,247
<SALES>                                         29,581
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,581
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,950
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,095
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,637
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    963
<INCOME-TAX>                                         7
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                956
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       956
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15
        

</TABLE>
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5157 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to waive certain requirements relating to the approval of programs of education for purposes of the educational assistance programs 

of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 17, 2014 

Ms. TITUS (for herself, Mr. STEWART, and Mr. MATHESON) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs to waive certain requirements relating to the approval of programs of education 

for purposes of the educational assistance programs of 

the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 5157 IH

1 SECTION 1. WAIVER OF CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS RELAT2 ING TO THE APPROVAL OF PROGRAMS OF 

3 EDUCATION FOR PURPOSES OF THE EDU4 CATIONAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS OF THE 

5 DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

6 Section 3680A of title 38, United States Code, is 

7 amended by adding at the end the following new sub8 section: 

9 ‘‘(h) The Secretary may waive subsection (e) in the 

10 case of a program of education offered by an educational 

11 institution if the educational institution has been oper12 ating a program of education in another location for at 

13 least two years and such program of education is approved 

14 under this chapter.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 13673    Filed: 04/18/23    Entered: 04/18/23 12:00:33    Page 1of 2

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 13673    Filed: 04/18/23    Entered: 04/18/23 12:00:33    Page 2of 2
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and
 b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Gary D. TollefsonGary D. TollefsonPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3085 Filed: 07/18/19 Entered: 07/18/19 17:57:19 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3085 Filed: 07/18/19 Entered: 07/18/19 17:57:19 Page 2 of

2
Opinion issued December 18, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-18-00659-CV

———————————

ORION REAL ESTATE SERVICES SOUTHEAST, LLC, Appellant

V.

SP JEFFERSON LAKES I, LP, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1098447

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Orion Real Estate Services Southeast, LLC, has filed a motion to 

dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Although appellant’s motion 

does not contain a certificate of conference, it contains a certificate of service on 

counsel for appellee, the motion has been on file with this Court for more than ten 
2

days, and no response has been filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5(d), (e), 10.1(a)(5), 

10.3(a)(2). No other party has filed a notice of appeal and no opinion has issued. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (c).

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. 

P. 42.1(a)(1), (d), 43.2(f). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Higley, Lloyd, and Caughey.
#### Mary C. Warren, as Executrix, etc., and others, Respondents, v. William C. Banning, Individually, and as Executor, etc., Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Follett, J.
1

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1 February 11 , 2015 03
- 14
-00715
-CV C- 1
-CV- 14
- 008244 Eue Jin Jeong et al vs . Texas Greenovation

I have received the notice for the above styled case . As of today I have not received a request for the court reporter ' s record in this case . Please contact me if you have any further questions . Thank you ,
Amanda Anderson , CSR Official Court Reporter County Court at Law No . 2 Travis County, Texas 1000 Guadalupe St . , Rm 211 Austin , Texas 78701 512 854
- 9250 FAX : 512 854
-4724
#### In the Matter of the Application of the ATTORNEY-GENERAL, Appellant, *v.*THE NORTH AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

*Registered, policy act*— *chapter*902 *of*1869 *—proceeds of securities to he paid to receiver.*

Where the securities deposited with the superintendent of the insurance department under the registered policy act, chapter 902 of 1869, have been sold, as provided in section eight thereof, it is the duty of the superintendent to immediately pay over the proceeds thereof to the receiver of the company.

Appeal from an order made at Special Term, directing a peremptory mandamus to issue to Hon. John F. Smyth, superintendent of the insurance department, commanding him to pay over to Henry R. Pierson, as receiver of the North America Life Insurance Company, the sum of about one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), held by the said superintendent under the laws of the State, as the proceeds of the sale or conversion of securities in the hands of the superintendent, under chapter 902 of the Laws of 1869, as security for the policyholders in said company, and also directing that any further sums that may be received by the superintendent be paid to said receiver in like manner.

*471
      *A. Schoonmalcer, Jr.,*for the appellant.

*It. W. Peclcham,*for the respondent.

*Per Curiam:*

We think that the court below properly construed the part of the statute which requires the superintendent to pay to the receiver the proceeds of the securities. It is not necessary to consider whether it may not be somewdiat discretionary with the superintendent, the treasurer and the receiver to determine when the securities should be sold. But when that has been determined and the securities have been sold, then the statute is explicit. The proceeds are to be paid to the receiver. There is nothing in the statute which intimates that the superintendent is to retain the proceeds for any time after the securities have been sold, and there is no reason why he should do so.

One clause of the order appealed from directs the receiver, out of these proceeds, to pay the costs and expenses of this proceeding. No argument was made on this clause. But it should be stricken out. The statute states specifically how the receiver is to use the proceeds. There is no reason why the superintendent’s costs shoidd be paid therefrom. And nothing is shown rendering it necessary to make any specific charge of the receiver’s costs and expenses. A general direction to pay the costs and expenses of this proceeding is too vague.

This clause should be stricken out. The order, as thus modified, is affirmed, with ten dollars costs, and printing disbursements to be paid by the appellant.

Present — Leakned, P. J., Bocees and BoabdhaN, JJ.

Order affirmed, except as to part giving costs out of the fund which is stricken out, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 295 Filed: 02/05/19 Entered: 02/05/19 10:52:03 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION and PACIFIC GAS 

AND ELECTRIC COMPANY,

 Debtors 

Chapter 11 

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

(Jointly Administered) 

TRANSFER OF CLAIM OTHER THAN FOR SECURITY 

A CLAIM HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS CASE or deemed filed under 11 U.S.C. § 1111(a). 

Transferee hereby gives evidence and notice pursuant to Rule 3001(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of 

Bankruptcy Procedure of the transfer, other than for security, of the claim referenced in this 

evidence and notice. 

QuickPCSupport LLC Cherokee Debt Acquisition, LLC 

Name of Transferor Name of Transferee

Schedule No: 1031851 & 3.2974

Debtor: Pacific Gas and Electric Company 

(19-30089) 

Claim Amount: $113,733.00 

Name and Address where notices and payments 

to transferee should be sent: 

Cherokee Debt Acquisition, LLC 

1325 Avenue of the Americas, 28th Floor 

New York, NY 10019 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the information provided in this notice is true and correct 

to the best of my knowledge and belief. 

By: _____________________ Date: July 16, 2019 

Transferee/Transferee’s Agent

Penalty for making a false statement: Fine of up to $500,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years, 

or both. 18 U.S.C. §§ 152 & 3571. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3019 Filed: 07/17/19 Entered: 07/17/19 05:37:15 Page 1 of

2
CHEROKEE DEBT ACQUISITION, LLC

1325 Avenue of the Americas, 28th Floor

New York, NY 10019

Attn: Vladimir Jelisavcic

113,733.00

100

11

CHEROKEE DEBT ACQUISITION, LLC

Vladimir Jelisavcic

Manager

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3019 Filed: 07/17/19 Entered: 07/17/19 05:37:15 Page 2 of

2
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Kurt H. Jensen, Chief Financial Officer of Applied DNA Sciences, Inc. (the “Company”), in connection with the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, hereby certifies pursuant to the requirements of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that




●
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and●
the information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This certification is being provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to be deemed a part of the Report, nor is it to be deemed to be “filed” for any purpose whatsoever.







/s/  KURT H. JENSENKurt H. JensenChief Financial OfficerAugust 13, 2010
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5239 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5239

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
              any discharge of student loan indebtedness.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 29, 2014

   Mr. Pocan (for himself, Ms. Wilson of Florida, Ms. Bonamici, Mr. 
Vargas, Mr. McGovern, and Mr. Sarbanes) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
              any discharge of student loan indebtedness.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME FOR DISCHARGE OF STUDENT LOAN 
              INDEBTEDNESS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 108(f) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows:
            ``(1) In general.--In the case of an individual, gross 
        income does not include any amount which (but for this 
        subsection) would be includible in gross income by reason of 
        the discharge (in whole or in part) of any student loan if such 
        discharge was pursuant to--
                    ``(A) a provision of such loan under which all or 
                part of the indebtedness of the individual would be 
                discharged if the individual worked for a certain 
                period of time in certain professions for any of a 
                broad class of employers,
                    ``(B) subsections (d)(1)(D) and (e)(7) of section 
                455 or section 493C(b)(7) of the Higher Education Act 
                of 1965 (relating to income contingent and income-based 
                repayment, respectively),
                    ``(C) section 437 of the Higher Education Act of 
                1965, or
                    ``(D) subsections (c)(1)(F) and (g) of section 464 
                of the Higher Education Act of 1965.''.
    (b) Student Loans.--Paragraph (2) of section 108(f) of such Code is 
amended by striking ``made by--'' and all that follows and inserting 
the following: ``. Such term includes indebtedness used to refinance 
indebtedness which qualifies as a student loan under the preceding 
sentence.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to discharges of indebtedness after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```