1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP

767 Fifth Avenue

New York, NY 10153-0119

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP

Stephen Karotkin (pro hac vice)

(stephen.karotkin@weil.com)

Ray C. Schrock, P.C. (pro hac vice)

(ray.schrock@weil.com) 

Jessica Liou (pro hac vice)

(jessica.liou@weil.com) 

Matthew Goren (pro hac vice)

(matthew.goren@weil.com)

767 Fifth Avenue

New York, NY 10153-0119

Tel: 212 310 8000

Fax: 212 310 8007

KELLER & BENVENUTTI LLP

Tobias S. Keller (#151445)

(tkeller@kellerbenvenutti.com)

Jane Kim (#298192)

(jkim@kellerbenvenutti.com)

650 California Street, Suite 1900

San Francisco, CA 94108

Tel: 415 496 6723

Fax: 650 636 9251

Attorneys for Debtors and Debtors in Possession

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION,

 - and -

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY,

Bankruptcy Case 

No. 19-30088 (DM)

Chapter 11

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

Related Docket Nos. 2741 and 3147

DEBTORS’ CORRECTED SUPPLEMENTAL 

STATEMENT AND PLAN OF 

REORGANIZATION TIMELINE IN 

SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO MOTIONS 

TO TERMINATE EXCLUSIVITY

Debtors.

 Affects PG&E Corporation 

 Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company 

 Affects both Debtors

* All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case, No. 

19-30088 (DM). 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3515 Filed: 08/12/19 Entered: 08/12/19 15:18:52 Page 1 of

 7
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP

767 Fifth Avenue

New York, NY 10153-0119

PG&E Corporation (“PG&E Corp.”) and Pacific Gas and Electric Company

(the “Utility”), as debtors and debtors in possession (collectively, “PG&E” or the “Debtors”) in the 

above-captioned chapter 11 cases (the “Chapter 11 Cases”), hereby submit this supplemental statement 

and plan of reorganization timeline in further support of the Debtors’ opposition to (a) the Motion of the 

Ad Hoc Committee of Senior Unsecured Noteholders to Terminate the Debtors’ Exclusive Periods

Pursuant to Section 1121(d)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 2741] (the “Ad Hoc Noteholder 

Termination Motion”), filed by the Ad Hoc Committee of Senior Unsecured Noteholders (the “Ad Hoc 

Noteholder Committee”), and (b) the Motion of the Ad Hoc Group of Subrogation Claim Holders to 

Terminate the Debtors’ Exclusive Periods Pursuant to Section 1121(d)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code

[Docket No. 3147] (the “Subrogation Termination Motion” and, together with the Ad Hoc Noteholder 

Termination Motion, the “Exclusivity Termination Motions”), filed by the Ad Hoc Group of 

Subrogation Claim Holders (the “Subrogation Group”). 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3515 Filed: 08/12/19 Entered: 08/12/19 15:18:52 Page 2 of

 7
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP

767 Fifth Avenue

New York, NY 10153-0119

SUPPLEMENTAL STATEMENT

As the Debtors have stated in each of their oppositions to the Exclusivity Termination 

Motions, the Debtors, as fiduciaries for all economic stakeholders in these Chapter 11 Cases, are 

uniquely positioned to retain the exclusive right to file a plan given (a) the complexities of these cases, 

(b) the need to determine the Debtors’ wildfire liabilities either consensually or through an estimation 

proceeding, (c) the regulatory framework and approvals involved, and (d) the obvious parochial interests 

being pursued by both the Ad Hoc Noteholder Committee and the Subrogation Group in their chapter 

11 plan proposals. Notably, the primary features of each of those plan proposals are “consensual” 

agreements with only their own constituencies, and rather transparent attempts to acquire the equity of 

the reorganized Debtors at substantial discounts. These are only some of the patent deficiencies of these 

plan proposals. 

Moreover, again as noted in the Debtors’ opposition pleadings, the Debtors are deeply 

involved in the process of refining a chapter 11 plan that will fully address all of the recent legislative 

enactments and ensure that the Debtors timely emerge from chapter 11 by the June 30, 2020 legislative 

deadline. A proposed timeline for the Debtors’ plan process is annexed hereto as Exhibit A, which 

contemplates the Debtors’ plan being filed by September 9, 2019. As stated, that plan will encompass, 

among other things:

• payment in full or reinstatement of all prepetition funded debt obligations; 

• payment in full of all prepetition trade claims and employee-related claims; 

• payment of post-petition interest on all unsecured prepetition claims; 

• satisfaction of all prepetition wildfire claims in amounts agreed upon or as 

otherwise authorized or allowed by this Court, fully consistent with the terms of 

the new legislation – AB-1054; 

• rate neutrality for the Debtors’ 16 million customers; 

• the assumption of all power purchase agreements and community choice 

aggregation servicing agreements; 

• the assumption of all pension obligations and other employee obligations; 

• the assumption of all collective bargaining agreements; 

• participation in the go-forward wildfire fund provided in the newly-enacted 

legislation; and 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3515 Filed: 08/12/19 Entered: 08/12/19 15:18:52 Page 3 of

 7
4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP

767 Fifth Avenue

New York, NY 10153-0119

• emergence financing supported by a substantial infusion of cash raised from 

existing equity holders on market terms or in the capital markets if available on 

better terms, plus equity financed securitized bonds, if available. 

In connection with the formulation and development of the Debtors’ plan, the Debtors 

have been engaged in ongoing dialogue with Jones Day, on behalf of Knighthead Capital Management, 

LLC and Abrams Capital Management, LP, with respect to securing the equity emergence financing 

referred to in the last bullet above to implement the plan and for the Debtors to successfully and timely 

emerge from chapter 11 to ensure that the Debtors can participate in the go-forward wildfire fund. 

As stated at the hearing before the Court this past Friday, August 9, 2019, and as widely 

reported in the newspapers and other publications, in connection with the Debtors’ plan, the Debtors 

have received commitments from more than twenty (20) financial institutions for billions in equity 

capital to fund the Debtors’ plan (the “Equity Commitment”). As of the time of filing this pleading, 

the Equity Commitments aggregate approximately $10.25 billion and the Debtors expect that this will 

increase significantly over the next several days based on discussions with a number of large capital 

providers.

1

 The Equity Commitment is premised on a plan incorporating the Debtors’ plan provisions 

set forth above and includes the following additional features:

• it values the equity of the reorganized Debtors at multiples of the values per share 

proposed in the Ad Hoc Noteholder Plan Term Sheet; 

• it does not disadvantage one group of financial stakeholders to benefit another 

such group; and

• it provides the Debtors with the flexibility to access more efficient sources of 

capital for the payment of wildfire and other claims and return the Debtors to a 

more traditional position in the capital markets.

A copy of one of the Equity Commitment letters is annexed hereto as Exhibit B, and the other Equity 

Commitment letters received by the Debtors to date are substantially identical (with of course different 

1 In addition, over the last several months, the Debtors have been engaged with several money center 

banks, all of which have provided assurances that the Debtors have ample access to deep pools of both 

debt and equity capital in order to finance their successful emergence from chapter 11. Several of 

those financial institutions have expressed high levels of confidence in their abilities to raise at least 

between $35 billion and $40 billion of both debt and equity capital to satisfy claims, refinance 

indebtedness, and address other bankruptcy related and post-emergence uses, as needed. Taken 

together, the indications of interest thus far received from various financing sources clearly 

demonstrate there is abundant capital available on favorable terms to finance the Debtors’ emergence 

from chapter 11.

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3515 Filed: 08/12/19 Entered: 08/12/19 15:18:52 Page 4 of

 7
5

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP

767 Fifth Avenue

New York, NY 10153-0119

individual committed amounts aggregating the $10.25 billion referred to above).

And, notably, this funding proposal, without even having been further negotiated by the 

Debtors, is substantially superior to what has been proposed by the Ad Hoc Noteholders. Simply by

way of example, the Equity Commitment proposes a floor share price of in excess of $17.00 per share 

as compared to the approximate $6.00 or less per share price implied by various commitment levels of 

the Ad Hoc Noteholder plan proposal. Further, as indicated above, in addition to the Equity 

Commitment, the Debtors’ ongoing discussions with third party financing sources plainly demonstrate 

that there is robust interest among traditional utility investors that would easily enable the Debtors to 

raise debt and equity capital on terms far more advantageous than those provided in the Ad Hoc 

Noteholder plan proposal to fund and implement the Debtors’ plan. 

Moreover, to dispel the repeated allegations of the Ad Hoc Noteholders Committee that 

the Equity Commitment is conditioned on the passage of additional legislation in Sacramento (and 

despite the persistent efforts by members of the Ad Hoc Noteholders Committee to undermine that 

legislation) – no such condition exists. Of course, from the standpoint of the reorganized Debtors and 

all other parties in interest, such legislation would be beneficial because it would facilitate the ability to 

raise capital to satisfy the claims of wildfire victims and other creditors in the most efficient and lowest 

cost manner, which provides increased flexibility in achieving a timely plan that pays victims in 

accordance with AB-1054. But, as stated, the Equity Commitment is not conditioned on the passage of 

any further legislation. 

Consistent with their fiduciary duties to all economic stakeholders in these Chapter 11 

Cases, the Debtors are in the process of further engaging with the representatives of the equity holders 

to refine and improve upon what they have already offered – a proposal that much more fairly values the 

Debtors’ business enterprise – to attempt to develop a mutually acceptable chapter 11 plan that will 

expedite fair and equitable distributions to holders of wildfire claims and all other parties in interest. 

This effort will include providing the Debtors with the appropriate flexibility to consider higher or better 

financing offers when there is more clarity as to the precise funding needs for a chapter 11 plan, because, 

as the Debtors have noted and as all parties recognize, any chapter 11 plan funding proposal will be 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3515 Filed: 08/12/19 Entered: 08/12/19 15:18:52 Page 5 of

 7
6

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP

767 Fifth Avenue

New York, NY 10153-0119

conditioned on the consensual resolution or estimation by the Court of the Debtors’ wildfire liability. 

THE DEBTORS’ PLAN TIMELINE

In view of the foregoing and these recent developments, the Debtors believe it is even 

more important to maintain the Exclusive Periods in effect. The Debtors are the appropriate parties to 

be the steward of the chapter 11 process, particularly where creditors are to be paid in full and the Debtors

in a plan will take into account and properly address the legitimate interests of all stakeholders. This 

will maximize and, indeed, ensure achievement of the June 30, 2020 legislative deadline and obviate the 

concerns raised by the CPUC in dealing with the complex and extensive regulatory approval process. 

In furtherance of this goal, the Debtors have prepared the annexed timeline (Exhibit A)

for the chapter 11 plan process in the context of maintaining the Exclusive Periods. It sets forth a realistic 

and achievable path forward and, importantly, a timeline that will enable the Debtors to timely emerge 

and participate in the go-forward wildfire fund. 

[Signature page follows]

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3515 Filed: 08/12/19 Entered: 08/12/19 15:18:52 Page 6 of

 7
7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP

767 Fifth Avenue

New York, NY 10153-0119

Under the circumstances of these Chapter 11 Cases, their current posture and, in 

particular, the need to crystallize the Debtors’ wildfire liability as a gating item to any confirmable plan, 

the Debtors submit that the Exclusive Periods should remain in effect. 

Dated: August 12, 2019

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP

KELLER & BENVENUTTI LLP

By: /s/ Stephen Karotkin

 Stephen Karotkin

Attorneys for Debtors 

and Debtors in Possession

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3515 Filed: 08/12/19 Entered: 08/12/19 15:18:52 Page 7 of

 7