alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

November 22, 2010 

s1115 

Order 

 

November 22, 2010 

141208 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141208 

 COA: 291817 

Ingham CC: 08-000903 

JEREMY EUGENE RAILER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 20, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 22a0413n.06
No. 21

- 1669
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. TOMMIE LEE, JR. , Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

OPINION

B efore : GIBBONS, GRIFFIN, and STRANCH , Circuit Judges

. GRIFFIN , Circuit Judge

. Defendant Tommie Lee, Jr., was charged with conspiracy to possess with intent to
distribute drugs, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. Lee pleaded guilty pursuant to a plea agreement. As part of that agreement, Lee waived “any right he may ha ve to appeal his conviction on any grounds.” Nearly sixteen months after pleading guilty , but before sentencing,
Lee moved to withdraw his plea. The district court denied the motion and imposed a 120

- month

sentence . Lee now appeals the denial of his mot ion to withdraw the guilty plea

. B ecause he
waived the right to appeal his conviction , we must dismiss his appeal.

“ It is well settled that a defendant ‘ may waive any right, even a constitutional right, by means of a plea agreement , ’ ” so long as that a greement is made knowingly and voluntarily. United
States v. Toth , 668 F.3d 374, 377 (6th Cir. 2012) (quoting United States v. Calderon , 388 F.3d 197, 199 (6th Cir. 2004) ). When, as here, a defendant does not challenge the validity of the appealNo. 21

- 1669 , United States v. Lee

- 2

-

waiver, we employ de novo review to see if the claims presented on appeal fall within the scope
of the waiver. Id. at 378. Because “ an appeal of the denial of a motion to withdraw a guilty plea is an attack on the conviction subject to an appeal waiver provision , ” i d. at 378

– 79 , and because Lee challenges only the denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea, this appeal falls within the scope of his appellate waiver. Accordingly, we dismiss th e appeal.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>



MIDSOUTH BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES                               EXHIBIT 11
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE  (Unaudited)
FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND 1998


				    Third Quarter    Third Quarter    Year-to-Date     Year-to-Date
				    September 30,    September 30,    September 30,    September 30,
BASIC                                   1999             1998             1999             1998
				    _____________    _____________    _____________    _____________
<S>                                 <C>               <C>             <C>              <C>
Earnings:
    Income applicable to common
    stock                              $680,328         $587,102       $1,878,749       $1,743,298
				    ============      ===========     ============     ============
Shares:
    Weighted average number of
      common shares outstanding,      2,448,731        2,417,457        2,435,075        2,404,799
				    ============      ===========     ============     ============

Earnings per common share:
    Income applicable to common
    stock                                 $0.28            $0.24            $0.77            $0.72
				    ============      ===========     ============     ============


DILUTED

Earnings:
    Net income                         $712,976         $624,105       $1,977,683       $1,855,265
				    ============      ===========     ============     ============

Weighted average number of
    common shares outstanding         2,448,731        2,417,457        2,435,075        2,404,799

    Assuming exercise of options,
      reduced by the number of
      shares which could have
      been purchased with the
      proceeds from exercise of
      such options at the
      average issue price                49,500           72,891           54,183           75,485

    Assuming conversion of
      preferred stock at a
      conversion rate of 1 to
      2.998 shares                      459,668          473,270          464,504          476,304
				    ____________      ___________     ____________     ____________
    Weighted average number of
      common shares outstanding,
      as adjusted                     2,957,899        2,963,618        2,953,762        2,956,588
				    ============      ===========     ============     ============


Fully diluted earnings per common
  share                                   $0.24            $0.21            $0.67            $0.63
				    ============      ===========     ============     ============

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BAKER 

&

HOSTETLER LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

Robert A. Julian (SBN 88469)

Cecily A. Dumas (SBN 111449)

BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP

1160 Battery Street, Suite 100

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: 628.208.6434

Facsimile: 310.820.8859

Email: rjulian@bakerlaw.com

Email: cdumas@bakerlaw.com

Eric E. Sagerman (SBN 155496)

Lauren T. Attard (SBN 320898)

BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP

11601 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1400

Los Angeles, CA 90025

Telephone: 310.820.8800

Facsimile: 310.820.8859

Email: esagerman@bakerlaw.com

Email: lattard@bakerlaw.com

Counsel for Official Committee of Tort Claimants

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION

-andPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY,

Debtors

Case No. 19-30088 (DM)

Chapter 11

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

□ Affects PG& E Corporation

□ Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company

■ Affects both Debtors

*All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case, 

No. 19-30088 (DM)

DECLARATION OF JOSEPH M. 

ESMONT IN SUPPORT OF THE 

MOTION OF THE OFFICIAL 

COMMITTEE OF TORT CLAIMANTS 

FOR AN ORDER DETERMINING 

PROCEDURES FOR PRESERVING 

JURY TRIAL RIGHTS

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3482 Filed: 08/08/19 Entered: 08/08/19 18:31:19 Page 1 of

2
~ 

J 

J~ 

"<: 0 :'.J,-l u I- i-, ~ w <: u 

t; ~ ~ ow" :r: z"' 

~~~ w e- U> 

~ <>: 

"' 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

I, Joseph M. Esmont, declare the following under penalty of peijury pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

section 17 46: 

1. I submit this declaration in suppmt of the motion of the Official Committee of Tort 

Claimants for entry of an order shmtening time for a hearing on the motion for entry of an order 

determining procedures for jury trial rights (the ",Jury Trial Motion"). I have personal knowledge 

of the facts set forth in this declaration. 

2. I am a member of the State Bar of Ohio and a counsel at Baker & Hostetler LLP. I 

am admitted pro hac vice to this Court. 

3. On August 7, 2019, I asked Mr. Orsini by email whether the Debtors would consent 

to the relief requested in the Jury Trial Motion; on August 8, 2019, Mr. Orsini indicated the Debtors 

would not consent. 

4. On August 8, 2019, at 1: 17 Pacific time, I asked Mr. Orsini by email whether the 

Debtors would consent to the Motion to Shmten Time, and I requested a response by 4:00 p.m. 

Pacific time. As of 4:30 p.m. Pacific time, Mr. Orsini had not yet ~·esponded. 

16 I declare under penalty of pe1jury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing 

17 is true and correct. 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

. 26 

27 

28 

Executed on August 8, 2019. 

/

Jo~eph M/Esmo1it( / 1 . / "'·v 

l/ 

2 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3482 Filed: 08/08/19 Entered: 08/08/19 18:31:19 Page 2 of

2
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________
No. 21

- 14212
Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus NICHOLAS STEPHEN WOODYARD,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 3:20

- cr

- 00039

- BJD

- PDB

- 2

____________________ USCA11 Case: 21-14212 Date Filed: 06/13/2022 Page: 1 of 22 Opinion of the Court 21

- 14212

Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR, and NEWSOM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:Shehnoor Grewal, appointed counsel for Nicholas Woodyard in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 73 8 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and Woodyard’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. USCA11 Case: 21-14212 Date Filed: 06/13/2022 Page: 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of Transact Energy Corp., Inc. a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Harold Forzley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    /s/ Harold Forzley Harold Forzley Chief Financial Officer Date: March 12, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 101 (Wednesday, May 26, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29600-29601]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12679]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7028]


In the Matter of the Designation of Mohamed Belkalem; Also Known 
as Abdelali Abou Dher; Also Known as El Harrachi; as a Specially 
Designated Global Terrorist Pursuant to Section 1(b) of Executive Order 
13224, as Amended

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) 
of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive 
Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive

[[Page 29601]]

Order 13284 of January 23, 2003, I hereby determine that the individual 
known as, also known as Abdelali Abou Dher, also known as El Harrachi 
committed, or poses a significant risk of committing, acts of terrorism 
that threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the national security, 
foreign policy, or economy of the United States.
    Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 
13224 that ``prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the 
Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States 
would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in 
the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously,'' I 
determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person 
subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence 
in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the 
measures authorized in the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: May 14, 2010.
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-12679 Filed 5-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 294 Filed: 02/05/19 Entered: 02/05/19 10:47:46 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EXHIBIT A 

(Dismissal Order in Coordinated North Bay Fire and Camp Fire Cases) 

 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13686-1 Filed: 04/26/23 Entered: 04/26/23 16:41:19 Page 1

of 3
66270805

Jan 20 2021 

01:21PM

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13686-1 Filed: 04/26/23 Entered: 04/26/23 16:41:19 Page 2

of 3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13686-1 Filed: 04/26/23 Entered: 04/26/23 16:41:19 Page 3

of 3
Notice Recipients

District/Off: 0971−3 User: dchambers Date Created: 8/12/2019

Case: 19−30088 Form ID: TRANSC Total: 28

Recipients submitted to the Claims Agent (Prime Clerk):

aty Jessica Liou Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153

RICHARD W. SLACK, ESQ. STEPHEN KAROTKIN, ESQ. Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767

Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153

JANE KIM, ESQ. Keller & Benvenutti LLP 650 California Street, Suite 1900 San Francisco, CA

94108

ALAN W. KORNBERG, ESQ. BRIAN S. HERMANN, ESQ. Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton &

Garris 1285 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10019

NANCY A. MITCHELL, ESQ. O'Melveny & Myers 1999 Avenue of the Stars 8th floor Los

Angeles, CA 90067

GREGORY A. BRAY, ESQ. Milbank LLP 2029 Century Park East 33rd Floor Los Angeles, CA

90067

CECILY A. DUMAS, ESQ. Baker & Hostetler LLP 11601 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1400 Los

Angeles, CA 90025

ABID QURESHI, ESQ. MICHAEL S. STAMER, ESQ. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld

LLP 1999 Avenue of the Stars Suite 600 Los Angeles, CA 90067

MATHEW A. FELDMAN, ESQ. Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP 787 Seventh Avenue New York,

NY 10019

ROBERT G. HARRIS, ESQ. Binder & Malter LLP 2775 Park Ave Santa Clara, CA 95050

JAMES O. JOHNSTON, ESQ. Jones Day 555 California Street 26th Floor San Francisco, CA

94104

GREG M. ZIPES, ESQ. Office of the United States Trustee U.S. Federal Office Building Suite

1006 New York, NY 10014

BETH M. BROWNSTEIN, ESQ. Arent Fox LLP 1301 Avenue of the Americas 42nd Floor New

York, NY 10019

ALLAN S. BRILLIANT, ESQ. Dechert LLP Three Bryant Park 1095 Avenue of the

Americas New York, NY 10036

SANDER L. ESSERMAN, ESQ. Stutzman, Bromberg, Esserman & Plifka 2323 Bryan Street Suite

2200 Dallas, TX 75201

AMY CATON, ESQ. Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP 1177 Avenue of the Americas New

York, NY 10036

G. LARRY ENGEL, ESQ. Engel Law, PC 12116 Horseshoe Lane Nevada City, CA 95959

EREZ E. GILAD, ESQ. Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP 180 Maiden Lane New York, NY 10038

FRANK A. MEROLA, ESQ. Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP 2029 Century Park East Los

Angeles, CA 90067

BRADLEY C. KNAPP, ESQ. Locke Lord LLP 601 Poydras Street, Suite 2660 New Orleans, LA

70130

BERNARD J. KORNBERG, ESQ. Severson & Werson 1 Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600 San

Francisco, CA 94111

RICHARD A. MARSHACK, ESQ. Marshack Hays LLP 870 Roosevelt Irvine, CA 92620

PAUL J. PASCUZZI, ESQ. Felderstein Fitzgerald Willoughby Pascuzzi & Rios LLP 500 Capitol

Mall, Suite 2250 Sacramento, CA 95814

ESTELA O. PINO, ESQ. Pino & Associates, LLP Westchester Financial Center 50 Main

Street White Plains, NY 10606

PAUL N. SILVERSTEIN, ESQ. Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP 200 Park Avenue New York, NY

10166

DAVID M. STERN, ESQ. Klee, Tuchin, Bogdanoff & Stern LLP 1999 Avenue of the Stars 39th

Fl. Los Angeles, CA 90067

MICHAEL H. TORKIN, ESQ. Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP 425 Lexington Avenue New York,

NY 10017

EDWARD J. TREDINNICK, ESQ. Greene Radovsky Maloney Share & Hennigh LLP 1 Front

Street Suite 3200 San Francisco, CA 94111

TOTAL: 28

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3502-3 Filed: 08/12/19 Entered: 08/12/19 09:00:41 Page 1

of 1
#### Louis J.Goddard, as Receiver, etc., Appellant, v. Stephen Stiles, Respondent.

—Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Smith, P. J., not sitting.
#### Lydia Pritchard, Personally, and as Executrix, etc., of William Dickerson, Deceased, Respondent, v. Seldon Palmer and Others, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	USAF, Multinational Partners Train in Fire Emergencies and Rescues at Soto Cano AB
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4619" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/DOD2/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint news">
    <div class="header">
        <img height="100" class="print-logo" alt="Site Logo" src="/Portals/7/Images/SOUTHCOM_logo_thumb.jpg?ver=SIvIeRRofyrg5ZHPpvvh6Q%3d%3d" />

        <h1 class="title">USAF, Multinational Partners Train in Fire Emergencies and Rescues at Soto Cano AB</h1>
    </div>
    

    <div><b>By JTF-Bravo Public Affairs Office</b> <span class="date">/ Published March 28, 2022</span></div>
    <span class="dateline-text">SOTO CANO AIR BASE, Honduras , </span>
    <p>Firefighters with the 612th Air Base Squadron, based out of Soto Cano Air Base, Honduras will conduct a new iteration of exercise CENTAM SMOKE, a training exercise to enhance firefighting and rescue capabilities, March 28 – April 1.</p>

<p>The training will include participation from approximately 35 firefighters and rescue personnel from Belize, Honduras, Costa Rica, and Panama.</p>

<p>Participants will exercise in training scenarios including live structural and aircraft fires, vehicle extrication and low angle rescue, as well as conduct equipment familiarization and a firefighters obstacle course to test their skills to rapidly and safely move equipment and rescue victims.</p>

<p>Engagements such as these strengthen partner nation relations by integrating U.S. military personnel with local and regional partners to exchange knowledge, experiences, and best practices to enhance collective capabilities in support of the U.S. Southern Command area of operations.</p>

<p>As part of U.S. SOUTHCOM’s enduring promise to its regional partners, JTF-Bravo and its supporting commands routinely conduct training with partners to enhance interoperability.</p>

<p>Visit https://go.usa.gov/xzqHA for more information on JTF-Bravo.</p>
<br />
</div>

    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Footstar, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-20731, No. 333-30011 and No. 333-41390) on Form S-8 of Footstar, Inc. of our
report dated August 27, 2004, except as to Note 3, as it relates to Fiscal 2002
and 2001 which is as of September 27, 2005, with respect to the Consolidated
Balance Sheet of Footstar, Inc. and Subsidiary Companies as of December 28, 2002
and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and
comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the years ended December 28,
2002 and December 29, 2001 and the related financial statement schedule, which
report appears in the January 3, 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our report dated August 27, 2004, contains explanatory paragraphs that state
that:

     -    The consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for the
          fiscal years ended December 28, 2002 and December 29, 2001 have been
          restated.

     -    the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial
          Accounting Statement No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets in
          fiscal 2002; and

     -    On March 2, 2004, the Company filed voluntary petitions for
          reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. This
          filing for reorganization raises substantial doubt about the Company's
          ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do
          not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this
          uncertainty.


/s/ KPMG LLP
New York, New York
September 27, 2005
#### Monica Shkolnik, Appellant, v Hospital for Joint Diseases Orthopedic Institute et al., Defendants, and Ronald M. Krinick et al., Respondents.

Submitted October 23,1995;

decided December 28, 1995

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying appellant’s motion for reargument or, in the alternative, leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, dismissed upon the ground that that order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied, with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.

Judge Ciparick taking no part.
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the report of Beverly National Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter-ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donat A. Fournier, Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                            
|--- |  | ---------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Donat A. Fournier      
|    |  | Donat A. Fournier          
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer and
|    |  | principal financial officer
|    | 
|    |  | August 15, 2005            



The foregoing certificate is furnished
solely for purposes of complying with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and for no other purpose whatsoever. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein or in any of the Companys previous filings under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that might incorporate the Companys future filings, including this Report on Form 10-Q, in whole or in part, this Certificate shall not be incorporated by reference
into any such filings.