alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     
|----------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, Jamie Arthur Lewin, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Dussault Apparel Inc.
      for the year ended October 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Dussault Apparel Inc.                                                                

Dated: February 13, 2008

| | /s/
      Jamie Arthur Lewin              
| | ------------------------------------------
| | Jamie Arthur Lewin                        
| | Chief Financial Officer                   
| | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
| | Accounting Officer)                       
| | Dussault Apparel Inc.                     

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Dussault Apparel
Inc. and will be retained by Dussault Apparel Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3120    Filed: 07/22/19    Entered: 07/22/19 10:40:44    Page 1 of2

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3120    Filed: 07/22/19    Entered: 07/22/19 10:40:44    Page 2 of2
#### Megan Zureck, an Infant, by Her Natural Guardians, Roger Zureck et al., Appellants, v Adam Wheeler, Appellant, and Frank DeLuca et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Submitted September 5,1995;

decided December 7, 1995

Motion by plaintiffs for leave to appeal denied, with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements. Motion by defendant Wheeler for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely *(see,*CPLR 5513).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             226
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,015
<ALLOWANCES>                                       233
<INVENTORY>                                      8,794
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,242
<PP&E>                                          19,300
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,082
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,489
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,831
<BONDS>                                          7,499
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            3,835
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,311
<OTHER-SE>                                    (17,624)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,489
<SALES>                                          9,013
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,013
<CGS>                                            6,944
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,387
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    93
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 503
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     86
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 86
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        86
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 21, 2020

p1014

Order 

Clerk

October 21, 2020

160948

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 160948

COA: 344313

Jackson CC: 16-005177-FC

LADARRIUS SHAQUOR WOODS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 19, 2019 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu 

of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE that part of the judgment of the Court of Appeals 

addressing the trial court’s assessment of court costs pursuant to MCL 769.1k(1)(b)(iii), 

and we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals, which shall hold this case in abeyance 

pending its decision in People v Lewis (Court of Appeals Docket No. 350287). After Lewis

is decided, the Court of Appeals shall reconsider this case in light of Lewis. In all other 

respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining 

questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4926 

AN ACT 

To designate a segment of Interstate Route 35 in the State 

of Minnesota as the ‘‘James L. Oberstar Memorial Highway’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4926 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The segment of Interstate Route 35 between milepost 

3 133 at Forest Lake, Minnesota, and milepost 259 at Du4 luth, Minnesota, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘James L. Oberstar Memorial Highway’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the segment 

9 of Interstate Route 35 referred to in section 1 shall be 

10 deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘James L. Oberstar Me11 morial Highway’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 8, 

2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4926 

AN ACT 

To designate a segment of Interstate Route 35 in 

star Memorial Highway’’. the State of Minnesota as the ‘‘James L. Ober-
| 1.   | the      Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | the      information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                           |
|---------------------------|
| /s/      STEVEN L. WATSON |   |

|                         |
|-------------------------|
| /s/      JAMES W. BROWN |   |

| Note: | The      certification the registrant furnishes in this exhibit is not deemed      “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,      as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that      Section.  Registration Statements or other documents filed with      the Securities and Exchange Commission shall not incorporate this exhibit      by reference, except as otherwise expressly stated in such      filing. |
|-------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John O’Neill, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by

Van‘Brunt, P. J.
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (Item 1123)

Residential Funding Company, LLC

RFMSI Series 2007-SA1 Trust (the Issuing Entity)

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Residential Funding Company, LLC, as servicer (the Servicer) pursuant to the Series Supplement, dated as of January 1, 2007, and the Standard Terms of Pooling and Servicing
Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2006 (as amended from time to time, the Agreement), among Residential Funding Mortgage Securities I, Inc., as company, Residential Funding Company, LLC, as master servicer, and U.S. Bank National
Association, as trustee, does hereby certify that:

1. A review of the Servicers activities during the period covered by the Issuing Entitys
report on Form 10-K and of the Servicers performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based
on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 24th day of March 2008.



|       |  |                     
|------ |  | --------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
|Name:  |  | Anthony N. Renzi    
|Title: |  | Managing Director
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5270 

To promote the transportation of liquified natural gas from the United States 

on United States flag vessels, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 30, 2014 

Mr. GARAMENDI (for himself and Mr. HUNTER) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To promote the transportation of liquified natural gas from 

the United States on United States flag vessels, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Growing American 

5 Shipping Act of 2014’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PURPOSE. 

7 With respect to the trade and maritime transpor8 tation of natural gas produced in the United States, it 

9 is the purpose of this Act to— 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5270 IH

1 (1) enhance the national security and port safe2 ty of the United States by encouraging to the max3 imum extent practicable the transport of liquified 

4 natural gas on United States flag vessels; 

5 (2) maintain the technological ability of the 

6 United States shipbuilding industry to build and re7 pair vessels for the Navy and the Coast Guard by 

8 maintaining the critical industrial infrastructure and 

9 skilled human workforce necessary to build such ves10 sels; and 

11 (3) ensure to the maximum extent practicable 

12 that all maritime personnel operating vessels trans13 porting liquified natural gas to or from the United 

14 States are credentialed by the Coast Guard and 

15 qualified to hold a transportation security card. 

16 SEC. 3. PROMOTION OF TRANSPORTATION OF LNG FROM 

17 THE UNITED STATES ON UNITED STATES 

18 FLAG VESSELS. 

19 (a) PROGRAM.—Section 304(a) of the Coast Guard 

20 and Maritime Transportation Act of 2006 (Public Law 

21 109–241; 33 U.S.C. 1503 note) is amended by inserting 

22 ‘‘and from’’ before ‘‘the United States’’. 

23 (b) AMENDMENT OF DEEPWATER PORT ACT.—Sec24 tion 4(i) of the Deepwater Port Act of 1974 (33 U.S.C. 

25 1503(i)) is amended by inserting before the period the folVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:33 Aug 05, 2014 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5270.IH H5270

jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5270 IH

1 lowing: ‘‘or that will supply liquified natural gas to be ex2 ported on United States flag vessels’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### W. B. GARRETT v. E. H. TRENT and S. W. TURNER v. E. H. TRENT.

(Filed 20 September, 1939.)

Judgments § 22e—

It is error for the court to set aside a judgment on the ground of excusable neglect, O. S., 600, in the absence of a finding that defendant has a meritorious defense.

Two cases consolidated. Appeal by plaintiffs from order of *Alley, J.,*at June Term, 1939, of RockiNgham, setting aside judgments on the ground of excusable neglect, C. S., 600.

*Sharp <& Sharp and Joe W. Garrett for plaintiffs, appellants.*

*Glidewell & Glidewell for defendant, appellee.*

Per Curiam.

There is an absence of any finding of the fact by the court that the defendant had meritorious defenses, and for this reason the judgments should not have been set aside. *Cahoon v. Brinkley,*176 N. C., 5; *Hooks v. Neighbors,*211 N. C., 382.

Reversed.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 98 (Friday, May 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 28599]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12232]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR10-16-002]


Acacia Natural Gas Corporation; Notice of Baseline Filing

May 13, 2010.
    Take notice that on May 11, 2010, Acacia Natural Gas Corporation 
(Acacia) submitted a corrected baseline filing of its Statement of 
Operating Conditions for the interruptible transportation services 
provided under section 311(a)(2) of the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 
(``NGPA'').
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate proceeding must 
file a motion to intervene or to protest this filing must file in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered 
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, 
but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or 
motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests 
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing 
an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on the 
Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before the 
intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or 
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#31777463727e5f5d585f54624441415e434571575443521f565e47"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="44020116070b2a282d2a21173134342b363004222136276a232b32">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern time on Thursday, May 20, 2010.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-12232 Filed 5-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IB 

Union Calendar No. 410 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5036 

[Report No. 113–544] 

To amend title 17, United States Code, to extend expiring provisions of 

the Satellite Television Extension and Localism Act of 2010. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 9, 2014 

Mr. COBLE (for himself and Mr. GOODLATTE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JULY 22, 2014 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5036 RH

A BILL 

To amend title 17, United States Code, to extend expiring 

provisions of the Satellite Television Extension and Localism Act of 2010. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5036 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Satellite Television Ac5 cess Reauthorization Act of 2014’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION. 

7 Chapter 1 of title 17, United States Code, is amend8 ed— 

9 (1) in section 111(d)(3)— 

10 (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph 

11 (A), by striking ‘‘clause’’ and inserting ‘‘para12 graph’’; and 

13 (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking 

14 ‘‘clause’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph’’; and 

15 (2) in section 119— 

16 (A) in subsection (c)(1)(E), by striking 

17 ‘‘2014’’ and inserting ‘‘2019’’; and 

18 (B) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘2014’’ 

19 and inserting ‘‘2019’’. 

20 SEC. 3. TERMINATION OF LICENSE. 

21 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 119 of title 17, United 

22 States Code, as amended in section 2, is amended by add23 ing at the end the following: 

24 ‘‘(h) TERMINATION OF LICENSE.—This section shall 

25 cease to be effective on December 31, 2019.’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
4 

•HR 5036 RH

1 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 107(a) of 

2 the Satellite Television Extension and Localism Act of 

3 2010 (17 U.S.C. 119 note) is repealed. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 410 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5036 

[Report No. 113–544] 

A BILL 

To amend title 17, United States Code, to extend 

tension and Localism Act of 2010. expiring provisions of the Satellite Television ExJULY 22, 2014 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7065

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

NAJAC PAUL, a/k/a Joseph Derrick,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr.,

District Judge. (CR-95-145-2, CA-98-372-2)

Submitted: December 22, 1999 Decided: January 13, 2000

Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Najac Paul, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES OF ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999). We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting

the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See

United States v. Paul, Nos. CR-95-145-2; CA-98-372-2 (S.D.W. Va.

July 2, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2713 Filed: 06/21/19 Entered: 06/21/19 15:15:27 Page 1 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2713 Filed: 06/21/19 Entered: 06/21/19 15:15:27 Page 2 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2713 Filed: 06/21/19 Entered: 06/21/19 15:15:27 Page 3 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2713 Filed: 06/21/19 Entered: 06/21/19 15:15:27 Page 4 of

4
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                          661936
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   40446
<ALLOWANCES>                    8674
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                826026
<PP&E>                          21174438
<DEPRECIATION>                  8750342
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  14577469
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           280039
<BONDS>                         15230506
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        0
<OTHER-SE>                      (933076)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    14577469
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                856231
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   361043
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                59772
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              229644
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             205772
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    205772
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   8.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                   8.20
        



</TABLE>
#### Frances J. Coe, as Administratrix, etc., Appellant, v. The Rome, Watertown and Ogdensburg Railroad Company, Respondent.

— Judgment reversed on the exceptions and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. *Held,*that the evidence presented questions of fact which should have been submitted to the jury. —
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5089 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 2000 Mulford Road in Mulberry, Florida, as 

the ‘‘Sergeant First Class Daniel M. Ferguson Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5089 EH

1 SECTION 1. SERGEANT FIRST CLASS DANIEL M. FERGUSON 

2 POST OFFICE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 2000 Mulford Road in Mulberry, 

5 Florida, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Sergeant 

6 First Class Daniel M. Ferguson Post Office’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sergeant First Class 

11 Daniel M. Ferguson Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 8, 

2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5089 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostDaniel M. Ferguson Post Office’’. berry, Florida, as the ‘‘Sergeant First Class al Service located at 2000 Mulford Road in Mul-