alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 105 (Wednesday, June 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 30777]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13210]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1681]


Grant of Authority for Subzone Status; South Florida Materials 
Corporation (Distribution of Petroleum Products); Port Everglades, FL

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

    Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zones Act provides for ``* * * the 
establishment * * * of foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of the 
United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, and for 
other purposes,'' and authorizes the Foreign-Trade Zones Board to grant 
to qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade 
zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs and Border Protection ports of 
entry;
    Whereas, the Board's regulations (15 CFR part 400) provide for the 
establishment of special-purpose subzones when existing zone facilities 
cannot serve the specific use involved, and when the activity results 
in a significant public benefit and is in the public interest;
    Whereas, Broward County, Florida, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 25, 
has made application to the Board for authority to establish a special-
purpose subzone at the petroleum product storage and distribution 
facility of South Florida Materials Corporation (d/b/a Vencenergy), 
located in Port Everglades, Florida, (FTZ Docket 44-2009, filed 10/22/
2009);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment has been given in the 
Federal Register (74 FR 55812-55813, 10/29/2009) and the application 
has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; 
and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the 
public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby grants authority for subzone 
status for activity related to petroleum product storage and 
distribution at the facility of South Florida Materials Corporation (d/
b/a Vencenergy), located in Port Everglades (Subzone 25F), as described 
in the application and Federal Register notice, subject to the FTZ Act 
and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 21st day of May 2010.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-13210 Filed 6-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Order entered Ju ly 9 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 01374
- CR GAYLON DAVIS, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F12
- 33585
- K



### O RDER
The Court REINSTATE S the appeal. On June 29,2 015, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant’s
brief has not been filed. We ADOPT the findings that: (1) appellant desires to pursue the appeal; (2) appell ant is indigent and represented by court

- appointed counsel; (3) counsel’s explanation for the delay in filing appellant’s brief is her workload; and (4) counsel requested twenty

- one days from the July 7, 2015 findings to file appellant’s brief.
We ORDER ap pellant to file his brief by MONDAY, AUGUST 3, 2015

. We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to counsel for all parties.
/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
#### Samuel J. Campbell v. Albert Friedlander and Another.

— Appeal taken from order of Justice Smith February 27,1895, dismissed, with ten dollars costs to respondents.
#### Henry F. Myers and others, Respondents, v. Jeremiah Kinnie, Appellant.

— Judgment of the County Court of Herkimer county and of the Justice’s Court reversed, with costs. Opinion by

Follett, J.;

Vann, J. not sitting.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 105 (Wednesday, June 2, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 30710-30711]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13175]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[R05-OAR-2009-0731; FRL-9157-9


Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Wisconsin; Particulate Matter Standards; Withdrawal of Direct Final 
Rule

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Withdrawal of direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Due to the receipt of an adverse comment, EPA is withdrawing 
the April 8, 2010 (75 FR 17865), direct final rule approving 
Wisconsin's update to its state ambient air quality standards. The 
updates were made to the particulate matter standards by adding fine 
particulate standards and revoking the state's course particulate 
standards. The State of Wisconsin submitted this revision as a 
modification to the State Implementation Plan on September 11, 2009. In 
the direct final rule, EPA stated that if adverse comments were 
submitted by May 10, 2010, the rule would be withdrawn and not take 
effect. On May 7, 2010, EPA received a comment. EPA believes this 
comment is adverse and, therefore, EPA is withdrawing the direct final 
rule. EPA will address the comment in a subsequent final action based 
upon the proposed action also published on April 8, 2010 (75 FR 17894). 
EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.

DATES: The direct final rule published at 75 FR 17865 on April 8, 2010, 
is withdrawn as of June 2, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt Rau, Environmental Engineer, 
Criteria Pollutant Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), Environmental 
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson

[[Page 30711]]

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-6524, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bfcddeca91d2decbcbd7dac8ffdacfde91d8d0c9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e89a899dc685899c9c808d9fa88d9889c68f879e">[email protected]</span></a>.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Particulate matter.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: May 14, 2010.
Walter W. Kovalick,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
Accordingly, the amendment to 40 CFR 52.2570 published in the Federal 
Register on April 8, 2010 (75 FR 17865) on pages 17867-17868 is 
withdrawn as of June 2, 2010.

[FR Doc. 2010-13175 Filed 6-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### ESSIE PAPPAS v. LOUIS PAPPAS and MRS. ESSIE ELKIN and DA VILLUS PAPPUS, by His Next Friend, MRS. ESSIE ELKIN, v. LOUIS PAPPAS.

(Filed 1 May, 1935.)

1. Parent and Child A c—

Decree awarding custody of minor child to its mother, who had been divorced from its father and had married again, *held*correct upon the facts found by the court under the principle that the welfare of the child is the paramount consideration in determining its custody.

2. Parent and Child A b—

The duty of a father to provide for the support of his minor child is not absolute, and on the facts of the instant case, the order relieving the father of this duty while his child is in the custody of its mother *is held:*within the discretion of the trial court and not subject to review.

Appeals by both plaintiffs and defendant from *Harding, J.,*at February Special Term, 1935, of MecicleNbueg.

Affirmed in both appeals.

The above-entitled actions, each involving the custody of Davillus Pappas, the minor son of Mrs. Essie Elkins and Louis Pappas, her former husband, and his support by the defendant Louis Pappas while in the custody of his mother, pursuant to an order of the Supierior Court of Mecklenburg County, were consolidated, by consent, for trial.

On the facts found by him, Judge Harding remanded the said Davil-lus Pappas to the custody of his mother, Mrs. Essie Elkin, and refused to allow her motion that his father, the defendant Louis Pappas, be required to provide for his support while he was in her custody.

Both the plaintiffs and the defendant appealed from the order of Judge Harding to the Supreme Court.

*G. T. Carswell and Joe W. Hrvin for plaintiffs.*

*H. L. Taylor for defendant.*

Pee Cueiam:.

On the facts found by him, to which neither of the parties excepted, there was no error in the order of Judge Harding in this case. The order is affirmed.

In *Tyner v. Tyner,*206 N. C., 176, 175 S. E., 144, it is said: “In determining the custody of children, their welfare is the paramount consideration. Even parental love must yield to the claims of another if, after due judicial investigation, it is found that the best interest of the children is subserved thereby.” This well-settled principle is applicable to the facts of the instant case.

*221The duty, both moral and legal, of a father to provide for the support of his minor child is not absolute. On the facts of the instant case, the order relieving the father of this duty, while his child is in the custody of his mother, was within the discretion of the judge, and for that reason not subject to review by this Court.

Affirmed.
----

|   | 1.     | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                |
|   | 2.     | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

|   | /s/  JAMES      A. HAYWARD |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|   | James      A. Hayward                |   |
|   | Chief      Executive Officer         |   |
|   | February 17,      2009          |   |
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00049-CR

Gilbert Junior Collins a/k/a Gilbert 

Jouinor Collins

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

§

From Criminal District Court No. 3

of Tarrant County (1324834D)

April 23, 2015

Opinion by Justice Dauphinot

Concurrence by Chief Justice Livingston

(p)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Lee Ann Dauphinot______________

 Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot
**Exhibit 35.2****Servicer Compliance Statement**     The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Sallie Mae, Inc., the Servicer and Administratorfor the trusts listed on Appendix A hereto (the “Trusts”), does hereby certify that:     (a) This certificate is delivered pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB.     (b) A review of the servicing activities of the Servicer and the Administrator as of December31, 2007 and for the period January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007 (the “Reporting Period”) andtheir performance under the applicable servicing and administration agreements for each of theTrusts has been made under my supervision; and     (c) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer and the Administrator havefulfilled all of their obligations under the applicable servicing and administration agreements foreach of the Trusts in all material respects through the Reporting Period.March 26, 2008   /s/ C.E. ANDREWS C.E. Andrews  President  Sallie Mae, Inc.  
 

 
**Appendix A**   Trust Name: Date of Issuance:SLM Student Loan Trust 2006-1 January 26, 2006SLM Student Loan Trust 2006-2 February 23, 2006SLM Student Loan Trust 2006-3 March 9, 2006SLM Student Loan Trust 2006-4 April 20, 2006SLM Student Loan Trust 2006-5 June 21, 2006SLM Student Loan Trust 2006-6 July 20, 2006SLM Student Loan Trust 2006-7 August 10, 2006SLM Student Loan Trust 2006-8 September 14, 2006SLM Student Loan Trust 2006-9 October 12, 2006SLM Student Loan Trust 2006-10 November 30, 2006SLM Private Credit Student Loan Trust 2006-A April 6, 2006SLM Private Credit Student Loan Trust 2006-B June 8, 2006SLM Private Credit Student Loan Trust 2006-C September 28, 2006SLM Student Loan Trust 2007-1 January 25, 2007SLM Student Loan Trust 2007-2 February 22, 2007SLM Student Loan Trust 2007-3 March 15, 2007SLM Student Loan Trust 2007-4 April 5, 2007SLM Student Loan Trust 2007-5 July 19, 2007SLM Student Loan Trust 2007-6 October 23, 2007SLM Student Loan Trust 2007-7 November 8, 2007SLM Student Loan Trust 2007-8 December 6, 2007SLM Private Credit Student Loan Trust 2007-A March 29, 2007
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dennis P. Wolf, Chief Financial Officer of Fusion-io, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to
my knowledge:

1) the annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2011 (the
Report) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: September 2, 2011 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ DENNIS P. WOLF     
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | Dennis P. Wolf         
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EXHIBIT C

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3995-3 Filed: 09/24/19 Entered: 09/24/19 17:25:35 Page 1

of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EXHIBIT C

EXPENSE SUMMARY

FOR THE PERIOD JULY 18, 2019 THROUGH AUGUST 17, 2019

EXPENSES AMOUNTS

Teleconference Charges (Court Call) $237.50

Total Expenses Requested: $237.50

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3995-3 Filed: 09/24/19 Entered: 09/24/19 17:25:35 Page 2

of 2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4206 Filed: 10/15/19 Entered: 10/15/19 12:15:48 Page 1 of

3
Exhibit A

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4206 Filed: 10/15/19 Entered: 10/15/19 12:15:48 Page 2 of

3
Exhibit A

Notice of Transcript Parties Service List

Served via First Class Mail

NAME ADDRESS 1 ADDRESS 2 ADDRESS 3 CITY STATE ZIP COUNTRY

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP Attn: ABID QURESHI, ESQ. One Bryant Park New York NY 10036-6742

Baker & Hostetler LLP Attn: ROBERT A. JULIAN, ESQ. and CECILY A. DUMAS, ESQ. 11601 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1400 Los Angeles CA 90025-0509

Baker & Hostetler LLP Attn: ELIZABETH A. GREEN, ESQ. SunTrust Center, Suite 2300 200 South Orange AvenOrlando FL 32801-3432

Binder & Malter LLP Attn: ROBERT G. HARRIS, ESQ. 2775 Park Avenue Santa Clara CA 95050-6004

Cotchett Pitre and McCarthy LLP Attn: FRANK PITRE, ESQ. 840 Malcolm Road Suite 200 Burlingame CA 94010-1413

Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP Attn: KEVIN J. ORSINI, ESQ. 825 Eighth Avenue New York NY 10019-7475

Jones Day Attn: BRUCE BENNETT, ESQ. 555 South Flower Street Fiftieth Floor Los Angeles CA 90071-2300

Locke Lord LLP Attn: BRADLEY C. KNAPP, ESQ. 601 Poydras Street Suite 2660 New Orleans LA 70130-6032

Marshack Hays LLP Attn: RICHARD A. MARSHACK, ESQ. 870 Roosevelt Irvine CA 92620-3663

Mary Alexander & Associates, P.C Attn: MARY E. ALEXANDER, ESQ. 44 Montgomery Street Suite 1303 San Francisco CA 94104-4615

McNutt Law Group LLP Attn: Scott H. McNutt, Esq. 219 9th Street San Francisco CA 94103-3806

Milbank LLP Attn: GREGORY A. BRAY, ESQ. 2029 Century Park East 33rd Floor Los Angeles CA 90067-2901

Milbank, LLP Attn: Dennis F. Dunne, Esq. 55 Hudson Yards New York NY 10001-2163

Office of the United States Trustee Attn: TIMOTHY S. LAFFREDI, AUST 450 Golden Gate Avenue 5th Floor, Suite 05-015 San Francisco CA 94102-3661

Pino & Associates Attn: ESTELA O. PINO, ESQ. 1520 Eureka Road Suite 101 Roseville CA 95661-2849

Skikos, Crawford, Skikos & Joseph, LLP Attn: STEVEN J. SKIKOS, ESQ. One Sansome Street Suite 2830 San Francisco CA 94104-4435

Stinson LLP Attn: ALISA C. LACEY, ESQ. 1850 North Central Avenue Suite 2100 Phoenix AZ 85004-4584

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP Attn: STEPHEN KAROTKIN, ESQ. 767 Fifth Avenue New York NY 10153-0119

Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP Attn: MATTHEW A. FELDMAN, ESQ. 787 Seventh Avenue New York NY 10019-6099

In re: PG&E Corporation, et al.

Case No. 19-30088 (DM) Page 1 of 1

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4206 Filed: 10/15/19 Entered: 10/15/19 12:15:48 Page 3 of

3
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership (the “Partnership”) forthe quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Harold Brown, theTreasurer and a Director of the Partnership’s General Partner of thePartnership, and Ronald Brown, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedeach hereby certifies, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)           The Reportfully complies with the requirements of 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.

 
|   | /s/ HAROLD BROWN                                                   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Harold Brown                                                       |
|   | Principal Financial Officer                                        |
|   | (Treasurer and Director of the Partnership’s General Partner, |
|   | NewReal, Inc.)                                                |

 

May 8, 2009

 

This certificationaccompanies each Report pursuant to SS906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002and shall not, except to the extent required by Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, bedeemed filed by the Company for purposes of SS18 of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by SS 906 has been provided to the Company and willbe retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 20, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

132439 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver & (23) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, MICHAEL T. DOE, and PATSY R. Justices DOE, Husband and Wife, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v SC: 132439 COA: 271311 Washtenaw CC: 02-000141-NH JOHN HENKE, M.D. , and ANN ARBOR ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY, Defendants-Appellants,

and

TRINITY HEALTH, d/b/a ST. JOSEPH MERCY HEALTH SYSTEM, d/b/a ST. JOSEPH MERCY HOSPITAL, Defendant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 17, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND th is case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted in light of Miller v Chapman Contracting, Inc , 477 Mich 102 (2007). The motion to reverse and remand is DENIED.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

l0613 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 20, 2007

Clerk
#### In the Matter of the Application of Harry S. Marx for Ad Bar.

Application granted.

Present — Jenks, P. J., Woodward and Rich, JJ.
Exhibit 10.3



FIRST AMENDMENT TO AIRTIME AGREEMENT

March 19, 2007



Bizcom USA, Inc. has requested CX2's cooperation in connection with the transfer of certain FCC licenses to Sophia Communications in settlement of certain past due obligations.



The Parties have agreed that certain FCC Licenses, which were owned by SMR Management, Inc. will no longer be available to CX-2 Technologies, Inc.



Bizcom agrees to transfer ownership of its other subsidiary, Bizcom Southern Holdings, Inc. to CX-2 Technologies, Inc. for $ 4.8 million, payable as follows:



CX-2 Technologies, Inc. agrees to issue three million restricted common shares to Bizcom USA, Inc. valued at $ 1 per share.



CX-2 agrees to pay the balance of $ 1.8 million through the assumption of certain past due obligations to Oxbridge Group, LLC and execution of a Promissory Note for the balance. The Note shall accrue interest at six percent (6%) and is payable in monthly installments of $ 10,000.



The monthly airtime payment of $ 4,000 per month is cancelled.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 12951 Filed: 09/13/22 Entered: 09/13/22 10:42:15 Page 1

of 1
No. 1339, Misc.

*Ephraim London*and *Martin Garbus*for petitioner.

#### Correa *v.*New York.

Supreme Court of New York, New York County. Certiorari denied.