alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BAKER 

&

HOSTETLER LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

Notice Parties

PG&E Corporation

c/o Pacific Gas & Electric Company

Attn: Janet Loduca, Esq.

77 Beale Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

Keller & Benvenutti LLP

Attn: Tobias S. Keller, Esq.

Jane Kim, Esq.

650 California Street, Suite 1900

San Francisco, CA 94108

The Office of the United States Trustee for Region 17

Attn: James L. Snyder, Esq.

Timothy Laffredi, Esq.

450 Golden Gate Avenue, 5th Floor, Suite #05-0153

San Francisco, CA 94102

Milbank LLP

Attn: Dennis F. Dunne, Esq.

Sam A. Khalil, Esq.

55 Hudson Yards

New York, NY 10001-2163

Milbank LLP

Attn: Paul S. Aronzon, Esq.

Gregory A. Bray, Esq.

Thomas R. Kreller, Esq.

2029 Century Park East, 33rd Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90067

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP

Attn: Stephen Karotkin, Esq.

 Rachael Foust, Esq.

767 Fifth Avenue

New York, NY 10153-0119 

Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP

Attn: Kristopher M. Hansen, Esq.

 Erez E. Gilad, Esq. Matthew G. Garofalo, Esq.

180 Maiden Lane

New York, NY 10038-4982

Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP

Attn: Frank. A. Merola, Esq.

2029 Century Park East

Los Angeles, CA 90067-3086

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4504-4 Filed: 10/29/19 Entered: 10/29/19 12:10:31 Page 1

of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EXHIBIT A

TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO TCC CHAIR

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4721-1 Filed: 11/14/19 Entered: 11/14/19 13:23:41 Page 1

of 2
1700 K Street, NW | Suite 825 | Washington, DC 20006 | 202-899-3834

www.tridentdmg.com

November 13, 2019

Ms. Karen Lockhart

Chair

Official Committee of Tort Claimants of

 Pacific Gas and Electric Company and PG&E Corporation

Email: Klockhart1492@gmail.com

Re: In re: PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company – Case 

No. 19-30088

Dear Ms. Lockhart:

Please find enclosed Trident DMG’s First Interim Application for Allowance and 

Payment of Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses for the Period July 18, 2019 

through September 30, 2019 in the above-captioned case, including its exhibits and 

supporting certification. The Bankruptcy Court’s Guidelines for Compensation and 

Expense Reimbursement of Professionals and Trustees provide that a debtor-inpossession, a trustee, or an official committee must exercise reasonable business 

judgement in monitoring the fees and expenses of the estates’ professionals. 

Please let me know if you have any objections, concerns, or questions with Trident’s 

application or requests for fees and expenses. The Office of the United States Trustee will 

also accept your comments. The Bankruptcy Court will consider timely filed objections by 

any party in interest at the time of hearing, which will take place at a time to be announced 

shortly.

Yours truly,

Adam W. Goldberg

Partner

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4721-1 Filed: 11/14/19 Entered: 11/14/19 13:23:41 Page 2

of 2
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 43812

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

JENNIFER ANN FRY ,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 690

Filed: September 16, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Steven J. Hippler , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of fourteen years, with a minimum period of confinement of two and one

- half years, for grand theft, affirmed

.
Eric D. Fredericksen, Interim State Appellate Public Defender; Elizabeth A. Allred , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________ Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GRATTON, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM
Jennifer Ann Fry was found guilty of grand theft

. Idaho Code § § 18

- 2403(1), 18

- 2407(1)(b) , and 18

- 2409

. The district court sentenced Fry to a unified term of fourteen years

with two and one

- half years determinate , suspended the se ntence
, and placed Fry on supervised
probation for a period of fourteen years. Fry appeals asserting that the district court abused its
discretion by imposing an excessive sentence.
Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the
factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 1 14, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

-2

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.
1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho
722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Fry ’s judgmen t of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4466 Filed: 10/24/19 Entered: 10/24/19 14:17:43 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4466 Filed: 10/24/19 Entered: 10/24/19 14:17:43 Page 2 of

2
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 532 

To amend title 11 of the United States Code to modify the dischargeability 

of debts for certain educational payments and loans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2013 

Mr. COHEN (for himself, Mr. DANNY K. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Mr. CONYERS, Ms. LOFGREN, Ms. BORDALLO, Ms. 

CHU, Mr. ELLISON, Mr. HOLT, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Mr. RANGEL, 

Mr. WAXMAN, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. COURTNEY, and Ms. PINGREE

of Maine) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 11 of the United States Code to modify 

the dischargeability of debts for certain educational payments and loans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Private Student Loan 

5 Bankruptcy Fairness Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXCEPTIONS TO DISCHARGE. 

7 Section 523(a)(8) of title 11, United States Code, is 

8 amended— 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 532 IH

1 (1) by striking subparagraph (B), and 

2 (2) in subparagraph (A)— 

3 (A) in clause (i)— 

4 (i) by striking ‘‘(i)’’, and 

5 (ii) by inserting ‘‘any program for 

6 which substantially all of the funds are 

7 provided by a’’ after ‘‘unit or’’, and 

8 (B) in clause (ii)— 

9 (i) by striking ‘‘(ii)’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘(B)’’, and 

11 (ii) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end. 

12 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS. 

13 (a) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Except as provided in sub14 section (b), this Act and the amendments made by this 

15 Act shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this 

16 Act. 

17 (b) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.—The amend18 ments made by this Act shall apply only with respect to 

19 cases commenced under title 11 of the United States Code 

20 on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
ex10_6.htm


 

EXHIBIT 10.6

 




	
A)  
	
Employment Contract of Li Chak Ming








Employer: Wide Broad Group Limited    Employee: Li Chak Ming Representative: Mr.Liu Ruisheng





Position: independent non-executive director





Job Duty: According to the experience, providing the independent and objective opinion for assisting the board of directors. The employee should assurance enough time and spirit handling the company affair in order to maintain effective operation and high standard operation of the
company.





Effective Period: 2 years, Effective date: July 1st, 2009





Remuneration: HKD$180,000/year will be paid in the last day for every quarter in four installments.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       2,475,292
<SECURITIES>                                 5,933,768
<RECEIVABLES>                                  160,415
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               106,504
<PP&E>                                      13,021,343
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,387,866
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,037,969
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,398,370
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,651,423
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,037,969
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,683,295
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                190,891
<INCOME-TAX>                                   190,891
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            190,891
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   190,891
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          25,362
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                20,545
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     60,630
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         116,061
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           115,850
<LOANS>                                        232,363
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,327
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 403,490
<DEPOSITS>                                     354,458
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             12,811
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,045
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,176
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 403,490
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,384
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,739
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   203
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 7,326
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,410
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,540
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,786
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      155
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,846
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,547
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,672
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,672
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .52
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.43
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,005
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  7,010
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,972
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       19
<RECOVERIES>                                       219
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,327
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,327
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
On behalf of JULIO A. CASTILLO, Clerk of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals,

the District of Columbia Bar does hereby certify that

David B Rivkin, Jr.

was duly qualified and admitted on November 13, 1985 as an attorney and counselor entitled to 

practice before this Court; and is, on the date indicated below, an Active member in good 

standing of this Bar.

For questions or concerns, please contact the D.C. Bar Membership Office at 202-626-3475 or email 

memberservices@dcbar.org.

Issued By: 

 District of Columbia Bar Membership

In Testimony Whereof,

I have hereunto subscribed my 

name and affixed the seal of this 

Court at the City of 

Washington, D.C., on August 6, 

2019.

JULIO A. CASTILLO

Clerk of the Court

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3613-1 Filed: 08/20/19 Entered: 08/20/19 14:16:47 Page 1

of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BAKER 

&

HOSTETLER LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

Exhibit B

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3393-2 Filed: 08/06/19 Entered: 08/06/19 17:27:03 Page 1

of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BAKER 

&

HOSTETLER LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

EXPENSE SUMMARY

FOR THE PERIOD JUNE 1, 2019 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2019 

EXPENSES AMOUNTS

Meals $ 43.34 

Mileage Reimbursement $ 148.48 

Miscellaneous $ 0.00 

Transportation/Parking/Tolls $ 6.00 

Total Expenses Requested: $ 197.82 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3393-2 Filed: 08/06/19 Entered: 08/06/19 17:27:03 Page 2

of 2
#### Emily M. Goodrich, Respondent, v. William J. Goodrich and another, Appellant.

— Memorandum of decision of March term so modified as to direct that if a reference is taken as suggested in the opinion, the defendant be allowed interest upon the amounts paid for taxes from the time it shall appear th • payments were made. The amount of such payments to be a lion upon the premises as against the plaimiff, suoordinaie to the Burt mortgage.
EXHIBIT 32.2  In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of OpenCell Biomed, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending November 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mislav Pavelic, in my capacities set forth below of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   March 16, 2009 /s/ Mislav Pavelic Mislav Pavelic, President (as Principal Financial Officer)
## F I FTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D23- 2226 LT Case No. 2019
- CF
- 004011

_____________________________ C HRISTIAN V ILLALBA -S ANTOS , Appella nt, v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee .

_____________________________ 3.800 appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County. Lisa D. Herndon, Judge. Christian Villa lba-Santos, Monticello, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee. D ecember 15, 2023 H ARRIS , J. Christia n Villalba
- Santos appeals the denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence. In that unsworn motion, Appellant makes a fact -based challenge to the lawfulness of his conviction. Such a claim is not cognizable in a rule 3.800(a) motion and should be raised in a rule 3.850 motion. See State v. Spe lla , 567 So. 2d 1051, 1052 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).2 We therefore agree with the trial court’s denial of Appellant’s motion. This affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant timely seeking the appropriate relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Lewis v. State , 926 So. 2d 437, 438 (Fla. 1s t DCA 2006). A FFIRMED .
M AKAR , and M AC I VER , JJ., concur.

________ _____________________ Not fin al until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________
Exhibit 15
   Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  The Board of Directors
 Cellcom Israel Ltd:
 
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-141639 and No. 333-184955) on Form S-8 of Cellcom Israel Ltd. (“the Company”) of our report dated March 15, 2015, with respect to the consolidated statements of financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2014, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, which report appears in the December 31, 2014 annual report on Form 20-F of the Company.
 
   Somekh Chaikin
   Certified Public Accountants (Israel)
 Member Firm of KPMG International
 
  Tel Aviv, Israel
  March 15, 2015
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4280    Filed: 10/18/19    Entered: 10/18/19 12:15:38    Page 1 of2

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4280    Filed: 10/18/19    Entered: 10/18/19 12:15:38    Page 2 of2
- 492 - N ebraska S upreme C ourt A dva nc e S heets 302 N ebraska R eports STATE v . SAVAGE Cite as 302 Neb. 492



### S tate of 

### N ebraska 

### , appellee 

### , v



### . C ourt n ey 

### J. S avage 

### , appella n t



### . ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed March 15, 2019. No. S-17-1166.

suppleme n tal opi n io n 

### Appeal from the District Court for Lancaster County: S usa n 

### I

. S tro n g 

### , Judge. Supplemental opinion: Former opinion modi

fied. Motion for rehearing overruled. Darik J. Von Loh, of Hernandez Frantz, Von Loh, appellant. Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, and Austin N. Relph for appellee.
H eavi c a n 

### , C.J., M iller


### - L erma n 

### , C assel 

### , S ta c y 

### , F u n ke 

### , P

apik 

### , and F reude n berg 

### , JJ.

P er 

### C uriam



### . This case is before us on a motion for rehearing filed by the appellant, Courtney J. Savage, concerning our opinion in State v. Savage , 301 Neb. 873, 920 N.W.2d 692 (2018). We overrule the motion, but we modify the opinion as follows: In the subsection “(a) Authentication,” after the fourth sentence of the fourth paragraph, we insert the following language: As for Savage’s contention that the State did not properly authenticate messages sent to him by others, we again disagree. The State was required only to introduce testi

mony sufficient to establish that the evidence was what Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 05/10/2019 09:07 AM CDT- 493 - N ebraska S upreme C ourt A dva nc e S heets 302 N ebraska R eports STATE v . SAVAGE Cite as 302 Neb. 492


### the State claimed it to be. The State did not claim that messages sent by others were anything more than mes

sages sent to Savage’s cell phone. See State v. Elseman , 287 Neb. 134, 841 N.W.2d 225 (2014). Savage , 301 Neb. at 885, 920 N.W.2d at 703. In subsection “(b) Hearsay,” following the second to the last paragraph, we insert the following paragraph: We also reject Savage’s argument that text messages sent to his cell phone by unidentified individuals contained inadmissible hearsay. Hearsay is “a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the mat

ter asserted.” Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-801(3) (Reissue 2016). Messages sent to Savage’s cell phone were not offered for the truth of the matters asserted. They were offered to prove that the statements were made. Savage , 301 Neb. at 887, 920 N.W.2d at 704. The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified. F ormer opi n io n modified



### . M otio n for reheari n g overruled



### .
EX-35.2
(logo) GMAC Mortgage

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (Item 1123)

GMAC Mortgage, LLC

SACO 2007-1


The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of GMAC Mortgage, LLC, as servicer
(the "Servicer") pursuant to the applicable servicing agreement, does hereby
certify that:

1. A review of the Servicer's activities during the period covered by the
Issuing Entity's report on Form 10-K and of the Servicer's performance under the
applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material
respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 17th
day of March 2008.

By: /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
Name: Anthony N. Renzi
Title: Executive Vice President



GMAC Mortgage, LLC
1100 Virginia Drive
Ft. Washington, PA 19034
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4110 Filed: 10/03/19 Entered: 10/04/19 11:10:17 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4110 Filed: 10/03/19 Entered: 10/04/19 11:10:17 Page 2 of

2