alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      22,125,840
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             7,600,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 85,231,732
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      16,848,229
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        17,014,000
<LOANS>                                    262,111,933
<ALLOWANCE>                                  3,371,435
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             417,919,143
<DEPOSITS>                                 362,992,063
<SHORT-TERM>                                 9,976,139
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          4,242,916
<LONG-TERM>                                    900,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       389,008
<OTHER-SE>                                  39,419,017
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             417,919,143
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             12,375,916
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            2,908,902
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               348,880
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            15,633,698
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           6,836,217
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           7,135,764
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        8,497,934
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  285,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             407,189
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              7,682,518
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,354,404
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   2,226,806
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,226,806
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.58
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.72
<LOANS-NON>                                  2,335,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   118,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                900,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             3,306,168
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  374,027
<RECOVERIES>                                   154,294
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            3,371,435
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         3,371,435
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**DONALD EUGENE WINFREE,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 318 MAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 7th day of October, 2015, the Petition for All owance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**
NO. 07-01-0109-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL E

	DECEMBER 30, 2002

	______________________________

	DAVID MEDINA,

			Appellant

	v.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

			Appellee

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 108TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

	NO. 43136-E; HON. ABE LOPEZ, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS, JJ., and BOYD, SJ.*

	David Medina (appellant) appeals from a final judgment under which he was convicted of delivery of a controlled substance.  Through a single issue, he contends that he was denied due process and a fair trial since the “State failed to allow [him] to take a shower or sleep on anything other than concrete prior to the [punishment] hearing” and the trial court “would not allow him to explain his appearance to the jury.”  This issue is identical to that raised in David Medina v. State, No. 07-01-0107-CR, pending in this court.

	Consequently, we adopt the reasoning and discussion in our opinion issued this day in cause number 07-01-0107-CR and conclude that it sufficiently disposes of the single issue appellant raises at bar.  In doing so, we also overrule appellant’s contention and affirm the judgment entered below. 

							Brian Quinn

							   Justice

Do not publish.
ex104.htm












GOLDEN MATRIX GROUP, INC. & SANTA ROSA RESOURCES, INC. 


CANCELLATION AND RELEASE AGREEMENT












THIS CANCELLATION AND RELEASE AGREEMENT (“Agreement”), is entered into this 26th day of May 2016, by and between Golden Matrix Group, Inc. (formerly known as Source Gold Corp.), (“GMGI”, “Company”), and Santa Rosa Resources, Inc. (“Santa Rosa”).







WHEREAS, GMGI currently owes Fifty Seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($57,500) to Santa Rosa Resources pursuant to a Convertible Note (number 60) entered into with Santa Rosa Resources on August 10, 2015.  The Note is non-interest bearing and is in the amount of $57,500.







WHEREAS, on or around February 22, 2016, GMGI entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement and a subsequent change of management took place.







WHEREAS, the Company is in the early stages of restructuring, changing the direction of the business the Company is engaged in, and moving the Company forward in a positive manner.







WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company feels it to be in the best interest of the Company and the Shareholders to reduce the outstanding debt of the Company incurred by the previous management.







WHEREAS, on May 26, 2016, Santa Rosa agreed to cancel the Convertible Note described above and to release any remaining obligation the Company may have to Santa Rosa Resources pursuant to that Convertible Note.







THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by both the Company, and Santa Rosa, that the outstanding Notes totaling $57,500 owed to Santa Rosa pursuant to the Convertible Note listed above, by the Company, shall be cancelled, and no further obligations of the Company, under the Note is contemplated.







FURTHER, it is agreed by both the Company and Santa Rosa that Santa Rosa shall release all future claims to subsequent conversions of the Note, the Company will have no further obligation to Santa Rosa under the Convertible Note and Santa Rosa shall be forever barred from seeking further conversions or claiming obligations of the Company under the Convertible Note.



















  





1











  











[Signature Page to follow]

















The undersigned do hereby acknowledge receipt, review, understanding and agreement with this Cancellation and Release Agreement.







/s/Anthony Goodman                                   May 26, 2016


_________________________________                                                                                      ______________________


Anthony Goodman, President                                                                                                       Date                      


Golden Matrix Group, Inc.

















                                             


/s/Eddy Aruda                                     May 26, 2016


_________________________________                                                                                         ______________________


Eddy Aruda, President                                                                                                 Date


Santa Rosa Resources, Inc.











  





2
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Card USA, Inc.., (the “Company”) on Form
10-KSB/A for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William P.
Williams, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, That to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





CARD
ACTIVATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


By /s/ William P.
Williams


William
P. Williams


Chairman,
CEO


(Sole
executive officer of the registrant)


December
24, 2008
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02

- 18

- 00421

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2

Denton County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV

- 2018

- 00916

Before Gabriel, Kerr, and Pittman, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### R ENO 

### M ANAGEMENT 

### I NC



### . AND 

### A LFONSO 

### F LORES 

### N ORIA



### , G UARANTOR



### J OINTLY AND 

### S EVERALLY



### , Appellants

V



### .

S MAL L 

### B USINESS 

### T ERM 

### L OANS



### , I NC



### . D 

### / B 

### / A 

### BFS C APITAL



### , A SSIGNEE OF



### B OF 

### I F EDERAL 

### B ANK 

### , Appellee2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have consi dered Appellants’ unopposed motion to dismiss their appeal.

We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Appellant s must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivere d: April 25, 2019
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 28, 2011 

t0620 

Order 

 

June 28, 2011 

142136 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142136 

 COA: 296541 

Wayne CC: 07-004275-01 

LAMONT DAUNIELLE PARIS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 11, 2010 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Exhibit 10.3


 


June
22, 2016


 


		RE:	Closing
                                         Statement in connection with the Note Purchase Agreement between Omagine Inc. (“Company”)
                                         and YA II PN, Ltd. (“Investor”). 



 


This
letter shall constitute the Closing Statement agreed upon between the Company and the Investor regarding various payments and
transfers to be made by the parties in connection with Note Purchase Agreement dated June 22, 2016 (“Subscription Agreement”).


 


The
parties hereby agree that the Investor shall make the payments and transfers set forth below in accordance with the wire instructions
to the account of each recipient as set forth on Schedule A attached hereto (or otherwise provided to the Investor):


 





	Gross Proceeds to be paid to the Company:	 	$	400,000.00	 
	Less:	 	 	 	 
	Commitment Fee to be paid to the YA Global II SPV LLC (as designee of the Investor):	 	$	(40,000.00	)
	 	 	 	 	 
	Net Proceeds to the Company:	 	$	360,000.00	 





 


[SIGNATURE
PAGE IMMEDIATELY TO FOLLOW] 


 




     


     


    

 


	 	Omagine
    Inc. 
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Charles
    P. Kuczynski
	 	Name:  	Charles
    P. Kuczynski
	 	Title:	Vice
    President & Secretary
	 	 
	 	YA
    II PN, Ltd. 
	 	 
	 	By:  Yorkville
    Advisors Global, LP
	 	Its:   Investment
    Manager
	 	 
	 	 	By:    Yorkville
    Advisors Global, LLC
	 	 	Its:     General Partner
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Gerald
    Eicke
	 	Name:    	Gerald
    Eicke
	 	Title:    	Managing
    Member


 






     


     


    

 


SCHEDULE
A


ACCOUNT
INSTRUCTIONS


 





 


 


	Omagine
    Inc. -  Confidential	 
	 	 
	 	 


 


YA
Global II SPV LLC and the Investor:


 


Instructions
on file.
#### George W. Burrows, Appellant, v. James McMurray, as President of the Fifteenth Ward Republican Association and Another, Respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.—

Pratt, J.:

This complaint was held insufficient, on motion to dismiss at the trial, on the ground that it failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. It sought to vacate the credentials of four out of five delegates chosen by the Fifteenth Ward Republican Association of Brooklyn to the Republican general committee of Kings county, Neither the association, the general committee, nor any individual representing it, nor either of the four individuals whose credentials are attacked are parties. The only ground alleged against the four delegates or their credentials is that “under the constitution and by-laws they are incompetent and disqualified from occupying the position. ’’ The provisions of the constitution and by-laws bearing upon competency or qualifications are not stated nor is it alleged that any such provisions exist. Other difficulties might be stated without going into detail. It is plain that the conclusion of the learned trial judge was correct. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Brown, P. J., and Dykman, J., concurred.
EXHIBIT C

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4211-3 Filed: 10/15/19 Entered: 10/15/19 14:42:05 Page 1

of 2
EXHIBIT C

EXPENSE SUMMARY

FOR THE PERIOD JULY 1, 2019 THROUGH JULY 31, 2019

Expense Type Amount

Airfare $6,902.14

Data Processing / Materials For Committee $69.35

Ground Transportation (In-Town - Taxi/Uber/Car Service) $1,601.91

Hotel Stay (Traveling) $3,378.32

Internet/Online Fees $101.93

Meals - In-Town Only $249.55

Meals - Out-of-Town Travel Only $538.08

Other / Miscellaneous $247.50

Parking $90.00

Printing/Photocopying (In-House) $661.15

Research (Databases) $4,500.00

Teleconferencing $87.17

Total $18,427.10

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4211-3 Filed: 10/15/19 Entered: 10/15/19 14:42:05 Page 2

of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          30,947
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             119
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                10,900
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    121,322
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           3,322
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             3,321
<LOANS>                                        811,355
<ALLOWANCE>                                     12,751
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 990,687
<DEPOSITS>                                     792,955
<SHORT-TERM>                                    71,910
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,144
<LONG-TERM>                                     50,570
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,646
<OTHER-SE>                                      57,462
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 990,687
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 16,764
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,014
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   171
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                18,949
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               8,008
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,668
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            9,281
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      115
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 674
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,926
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,632
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       5,632
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,695
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .34
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.01
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,613
<LOANS-PAST>                                        87
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   321
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  3,205
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                13,174
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      734
<RECOVERIES>                                       196
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               12,751
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          3,278


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 5, 2014

p0825 

# Order

Clerk September 5, 2014

148309(18)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MI CHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148309

COA: 316976

Calhoun CC: 07

- 000145

- FH

ANTHONY CLIFFORD GATES,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s April 28,

2014 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
#### Alexander Grant and another, Respondents, v. Syracuse Door and Blind Company and Clarence v. Kellogg, Appellants.

— Judgment modified by striking therefrom the provision directing Kellogg to pay $385.64 damages, and authorizing execution therefor; and in lieu thereof, inserting a provision directing the appointment of a receiverfor the corporation, and providing that, after his appointment and qualification, defendant Kellogg shall pay over to him $2,409.80, being the amount received by Kellogg on his judgment and execution, to be distributed by the receiver among the creditors of the corporation according to their respective rights and interests. The provision in the judgment allowing plaintiffs’ costs, as awarded, to remain. Ana the judgment, as so modified, affirmed, with costs of this appeal to the defendant Kellogg.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 2, 2018

a0924

Order 

Clerk

October 2, 2018

156976

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 156976

COA: 340809

Kent CC: 07-009532-FH

SCOTT BRADY COLE,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 8, 2017 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s 

motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R.

47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 97-30655

Summary Calendar

_____________________

GAIL BELONEY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WINN DIXIE LOUISIANA, INCORPORATED,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(CA No. 97-CV-839)

November 13, 1997

Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Gail Beloney appeals from a final judgment dismissing for lack

of subject matter jurisdiction her slip-and-fall diversity action

against Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc. (WDL). She contends that the

district court erred (1) in determining that WDL has its principal

place of business in Lo uisiana, rather than in Florida, and is

therefore not diverse from Beloney for purposes of 28 U.S.C. §

1332; (2) in not permitting additional discovery on the diversity- 2 -

issue; and (3) in permitting WDL to take the position that no

diversity existed, in the light of claimed prior inconsistent

positions in other litigation.

We review de novo a dismissal for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction, applying the same standard as the district court.

International Paper Co. v. Denkmann Assocs.

, 116 F.3d 134, 136 (5th

Cir. 1997). Pursuant to that review, we conclude that the district

court was (1) not clearly erroneous in determining th at WDL’s

principal place of business is Louisiana, G rinter v. Petroleum

Operation Support Serv., Inc.

, 846 F.2d 1006, 1007 (5th Cir.),

cert. denied

, 488 U.S. 969 (1988); (2) did not abuse its discretion

in not permitting discovery on the diversity issue (we note that,

although discovery was requested in the opposition to the motion to

dismiss, it d oes not appear that a motion seeking additional

discovery was filed), Villar v. Crowley Maritime C orp. , 990 F.2d

1489, 1495 (5th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1044 (1994); and

did not err in permitting WDL to assert that it was not diverse

from Beloney, Coury v. Prot , 85 F.3d 244, 249 (5th Cir. 1996).

AFFIRMED