alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2369

To amend title 49, United States Code, to waive federal preemption of

State law providing for the awarding of punitive damages against motor

carriers for engaging in unfair or deceptive trade practices in the processing of claims relating to loss, damage, injury, or delay in connection

with transportation of property in interstate commerce.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 6, 2000

Mr. KERRY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To amend title 49, United States Code, to waive federal

preemption of State law providing for the awarding of

punitive damages against motor carriers for engaging

in unfair or deceptive trade practices in the processing

of claims relating to loss, damage, injury, or delay in

connection with transportation of property in interstate

commerce.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 2369 IS

1 SECTION 1. STATE COURT AWARDS OF PUNITIVE DAMAGES

2 FOR UNFAIR OR DECEPTIVE PRACTICES OF

3 MOTOR CARRIERS IN CONNECTION WITH

4 CLAIMS FOR LOSS, DAMAGE, INJURY, OR

5 DELAY OF TRANSPORTED PROPERTY.

6 (a) PUNITIVE DAMAGES AUTHORIZED.—Section

7 14706 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by add8 ing at the end the following:

9 ‘‘(h) PUNITIVE DAMAGES FOR UNFAIR OR DECEP10 TIVE PRACTICES.—Nothing in this section limits the li11 ability of a carrier for punitive damages authorized under

12 applicable State law for any act or omission of the carrier

13 in connection with the investigation, settlement, adjudica14 tion, or other aspect of the processing of a claim under

15 this section that constitutes an unfair or deceptive trade

16 practice under such State law.’’.

17 (e) RETROACTIVE EFFECTIVE DATE AND APPLICA18 BILITY.—Subsection (h) of section 14706 of title 49,

19 United States Code (as added by subsection (a)), shall

20 take effect as of January 1, 1990, and shall apply with

21 respect to receipts and bills of lading referred to in sub22 section (a)(1) of such section that are issued on or after

23 that date.

Æ
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5284 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the work 

opportunity tax credit and to allow the transfer of such credit in the 

case of contracted veterans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 30, 2014 

Mr. JOLLY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

permanent the work opportunity tax credit and to allow 

the transfer of such credit in the case of contracted 

veterans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. WORK OPPORTUNITY TAX CREDIT MADE PER4 MANENT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c) of section 51 of the 

6 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

7 paragraph (4). 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5284 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to individuals who begin work for 

3 the employer after December 31, 2013. 

4 SEC. 2. TRANSFER OF CREDIT IN CASE OF CONTRACTED 

5 VETERANS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 51 of the Internal Rev7 enue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the 

8 following new subsection: 

9 ‘‘(l) SPECIAL RULE FOR CONTRACTED VETERAN EM10 PLOYEES.— 

11 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In the case of an employee 

12 who— 

13 ‘‘(A) is a qualified veteran, and 

14 ‘‘(B) receives remuneration by an employer 

15 for qualified computer services performed by 

16 the individual for another person, 

17 if the employer so elects, the amount of credit deter18 mined under this section (or any portion thereof 

19 specified in the election) with respect to such em20 ployee for the taxable year which would (but for this 

21 subsection) be allowable to the employer shall be al22 lowable to such other person, and such other person 

23 shall be treated as the taxpayer for purposes of this 

24 title with respect to such credit (or such portion 

25 thereof). 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5284 IH

1 ‘‘(2) QUALIFIED COMPUTER SERVICES.—For 

2 purposes of this subsection, the term ‘qualified com3 puter services’ means services of a type that would 

4 be classified as a computer occupation in the Bureau 

5 of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classi6 fication System. 

7 ‘‘(3) YEAR CREDIT ALLOWED.—In the case of 

8 an election under paragraph (1), the credit shall be 

9 allowable for the first taxable year of such other per10 son ending with or after the employer’s taxable year 

11 for which the credit was determined.’’. 

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

13 this section shall apply to individuals who begin work for 

14 the employer after December 31, 2013. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EXHIBIT B 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3914-2 Filed: 09/17/19 Entered: 09/17/19 14:50:59 Page 1

of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

COMPENSATION BY PROJECT FOR SERVICES RENDERED 

BY BERMAN AND TODDERUD LLP FOR THE PERIOD 

JULY 1, 2019 THROUGH JULY 31, 2019 

Description Hours Amount 

2000-2001 Energy Crisis FERC Litigation 101.3 $83,893.60 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3914-2 Filed: 09/17/19 Entered: 09/17/19 14:50:59 Page 2

of 2
#### ARTHUR ROGERS v. J. E. BANZET, Jr., Guardian, et al.

(Filed 21 September, 1932.)

Trusts *A*b — In suit to impress property with resulting trust complaint alleging loan but not setting forth trust held not demurrable.

In a suit to impress a resulting trust upon lands and to recover an amount due, a demurrer interposed on the ground that while a loan was alleged the complaint did not set forth the trust is properly overruled upon the facts admitted by the demurrer.

Appeal by certain defendants from *Moore, Special Judge,*at January Term, 1932, of WaRBEN.

*Folic & Gibbs for appellants.*

*Perry & Kittrell for appellee.*

Per Curiam.

The purpose of the action is to impress a resulting trust upon certain property and to recover an amount alleged to be due the plaintiff. The appellants demurred to the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, since it states a loan but does not set forth a trust upon the land or its proceeds. The court overruled the demurrer.

The allegations in the complaint, which the appellants admit by filing the demurrer, precludes dismissal of the action. Judgment

Affirmed.
[665 NE2d 655, 642 NYS2d 854]

#### In the Matter of New York Association of Homes and Services for the Aging, Inc., et al., Respondents, v Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health et al., Appellants.

Argued February 13, 1996;

decided March 21, 1996

*982APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Dennis C. Vacco, Attorney-General,*Albany *(Victor Paladino, Victoria A. Graffeo*and *Peter H. Schiff*of counsel), for appellants.

*Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft,*New York City *(Peter G. Bergmann, Kathy Hirata Chin*and *William J. Natbony*of counsel), for respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order reversed, with costs, and petition dismissed for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinions by Justices D. Bruce Crew (212 AD2d 163, 170-172) and John T. Casey (212 AD2d 163, 172) at the Appellate Division.

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick.
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of K.S. and L.M., child ren

, * From the 3 26th District Court

of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 10588

- CX

.

No. 11

- 2 3

- 00 007

- C V * June 8 , 20 2 3

* Memorandum Opinion by Bailey

, C. J.

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter , J. , and W illiams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that th ere is no

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the

order of the tr ia l court is in all things affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             569
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,117
<ALLOWANCES>                                       700
<INVENTORY>                                      2,786
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,869
<PP&E>                                          31,885
<DEPRECIATION>                                (15,008)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,192
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,551
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,939
<OTHER-SE>                                         721
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,192
<SALES>                                         59,143
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                59,143
<CGS>                                           50,775
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   50,775
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,531
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,084)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (439)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,645)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,645)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.43)
        

</TABLE>
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3118-1 Filed: 07/22/19 Entered: 07/22/19 10:16:45 Page 1

of 1
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5213 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to simplify the treatment 

of seasonal positions for purposes of the employer shared responsibility 

requirement. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 28, 2014 

Mr. RENACCI (for himself, Mr. SCHRADER, Ms. JENKINS, and Mr. COSTA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways 

and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to simplify 

the treatment of seasonal positions for purposes of the 

employer shared responsibility requirement. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Simplifying Technical 

5 Aspects Regarding Seasonality Act of 2014’’ or the 

6 ‘‘STARS Act’’. 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5213 IH

1 SEC. 2. SIMPLIFICATION OF SEASONAL RULES FOR PUR2 POSES OF EMPLOYER SHARED RESPONSI3 BILITY REQUIREMENT. 

4 (a) FULL-TIME EMPLOYEE EXCEPTION FOR DETER5 MINING ASSESSABLE PAYMENT.— 

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (4) of section 

7 4980H(c) of such Code is amended by redesignating 

8 subparagraph (B) as subparagraph (C) and by in9 serting after subparagraph (A) the following new 

10 subparagraph: 

11 ‘‘(B) EXCEPTION FOR SEASONAL EMPLOY12 EES.—Such term shall not include any seasonal 

13 employee.’’. 

14 (2) SEASONAL EMPLOYEE DEFINED.—Sub15 section (c) of section 4980H of such Code is amend16 ed by redesignating paragraphs (5), (6), and (7) as 

17 paragraphs (6), (7), and (8), respectively and by in18 serting after paragraph (4) the following new para19 graph: 

20 ‘‘(5) SEASONAL EMPLOYEE.—The term ‘sea21 sonal employee’ means an employee who is employed 

22 in a position for which the customary annual em23 ployment is not more than 6 months and which re24 quires performing labor or services which are ordi25 narily performed at certain seasons or periods of the 

26 year.’’. 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5213 IH

1 (b) APPLICABLE LARGE EMPLOYER DETERMINATION

2 EXCEPTION.—Subparagraph (B) of section 4980H(c)(2) 

3 of such Code is amended to read as follows: 

4 ‘‘(B) EXCEPTION FOR SEASONAL EMPLOY5 EES.—For purposes of subparagraph (A), sea6 sonal employees shall not be taken into ac7 count.’’. 

8 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

9 this section shall take effect as if included in section 1513 

10 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

     **18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of NORTHWEST CHARIOTS INCORPORATED (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Barbara Ceretzke, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: January 9, 2009

By: ***/s/ Barbara Ceretzke***

Barbara Ceretzke

Chief Financial Officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer

----
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 15 (Monday, January 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 3893]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-1345]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Illinois Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a planning meeting of 
the Health Disparities Subcommittee of the Illinois Advisory Committee 
to the Commission will convene at 8 a.m. and adjourn at 10 a.m. on 
February 22, 2010, at 55 W. Monroe St., Chicago, IL 60603. The purpose 
of the meeting is to plan for the Committee's report on Health 
Disparities in Chicago. The meeting will consist of approximately five 
local health disparities experts discussing issues regarding the 
project.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments; the 
comments must be received in the regional office by March 22, 2010. The 
address is 55 W. Monroe St., Suite 410, Chicago, IL 60603. Persons 
wishing to e-mail their comments, or to present their comments verbally 
at the meeting, or who desire additional information should contact 
David Mussatt, Director, 312-353-8311, TDD/TTY 312-353-8324, or by e-
mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#85e1e8f0f6f6e4f1f1c5f0f6e6e6f7abe2eaf3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="aecac3dbddddcfdadaeedbddcdcddc80c9c1d8">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require 
the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional 
Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the 
meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Midwestern Regional Office, as they become available, both 
before and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this 
advisory committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, 
http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Midwestern Regional Office at 
the above e-mail or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, January 19, 2010.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2010-1345 Filed 1-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### FELIX WILLIAMS (Since Deceased), W. T. ALSTON and RALPH ALSTON, Administrator of FELIX WILLIAMS, v. ANGIE H. ROBERTSON, A. J. ELLINGTON and Wife, UNDINE D. ELLINGTON.

(Filed 7 March, 1951.)

1. Reference § 4—

Where defendant pleads a statute of limitations, it is error for the court to order a compulsory reference without first disposing of the plea in bar.

a. Reference § 3—

An action in ejectment in which defendants plead the twenty (G.S. 1-39, G.S. 1-40) and the seven (G.S. 1-38) year statutes of limitation is not subject to compulsory reference. G.S. 1-189.

Appeal by defendants from. *Nimocks, J.,*September Term, 1950, of WARREN.

Felix Williams, tbe original plaintiff, instituted this action in ejectment against the defendants, alleging he was the owner of a tract of land in the possession of defendants. Defendants’ answer denied the allegations of the complaint, and pleaded the twenty-year statutes of limitations, G.S. 1-39 and 1-40, as a bar to the plaintiff’s claim.

Thereafter Felix Williams died and W. T. Alston purchased his alleged title from his heirs, filing an amended complaint alleging title in himself. The defendants filed answer denying his title and again pleading the above statutes of limitations. By leave of court they later pleaded the seven-year statute, G.S. 1-38.

The case came on for trial and after hearing the testimony of one witness, the court ordered a compulsory reference. The plaintiffs and the defendants excepted. Defendants appealed to the Supreme Court, assigning error.

*Kerr & Kerr and James D. Gilliland for plaintiffs, appellees.*

*Banzet & Banzet for defendants, appellants.*

DeNny, J.

It appears on the face of the record that a compulsory reference was ordered without first disposing of the pleas in bar. This was error and the appellees so concede. *Grady v. Parker,*230 N.C. 166, 52 S.E. 2d 273; *Ward v. Sewell,*214 N.C. 279, 199 S.E. 28; *Graves v. Pritchett,*207 N.C. 518, 177 S.E. 641; McIntosh N. C. Prac. and Proc., section 523, p. 564.

Furthermore, the issues involved and the relief sought in this action, do not appear to be such as to justify or support an order of reference pursuant to the provisions of the statute, G.S. 1-189.

*310The order of reference will be vacated and tbe cause remanded for further proceedings in accord with the rights of the respective parties.

Error and remanded.
#### Jefferson Taylor, Appellant, v. William Tousley, Respondent.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered before another referee, with costs to abide the event.

Opinion by

Smith, P. J.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CEO CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADDED BY
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   (i)
    
    the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
  /s/ Alan W. StockAlan W. StockChief Executive Officer
  /s/ Carol WaldmanName: Carol WaldmanTitle: Notary Public
#### George Douglas, Respondent, v. Michael H. Callahan, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten. dollars costs and disbursements.
Exhibit 31.6
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John Balzarini, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation,
   --------------
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending
March 31, 2005 of First Chester County Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report.



August 19, 2005



/s/ John Balzarini
-------------------------------------
John Balzarini
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 12.1
 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial
reporting.
  By:
    
    /s/ Jinsheng RenName:
    
    Jinsheng RenTitle:
    
    Chief Executive Officer