alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent, <br><br>against<br><br>Daqwan McGill, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Erika M. Edwards, J.), rendered June 5, 2015, after a nonjury trial, convicting him of attempted assault in the third degree and harassment in the second degree, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Erika M. Edwards, J.), rendered June 5, 2015, affirmed.</p><p>The verdict convicting defendant of attempted assault in the third degree (<i>see</i> Penal Law §§ 110.00, 120.00[1]) and harassment in the second degree (<i>see</i> Penal Law § 240.26[1]) was supported by legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (<i>see People v Danielson</i>, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis upon which to disturb the trial court's determinations concerning credibility. The evidence warranted the conclusion that when defendant threw a 10-pound traffic cone at the victim after an argument, striking the victim in the back, he did so with intent to cause physical injury (<i>see</i> Penal Law 120.00[1]; <a href="../2009/2009_02825.htm" target="_blank"><i>Matter of Edward H</i>., 61 AD3d 473</a>, 473 [2009]), and that he came dangerously close to doing so (see <i>People v Bracey</i>, 41 NY2d 296, 300 [1977]; <i>Matter of Charles C.</i>, 309 AD2d 516, 517 [2003]). The fact that the victim "managed to avoid physical injury does not preclude a finding that [defendant] attempted to inflict such injury" (<i>see Matter of Marcel F.</i>, 233 AD2d 442, 442-443 [1996]). </p><p>We further find that the evidence was legally sufficient to disprove defendant's defense of justification beyond a reasonable doubt. Contrary to defendant's contention, the credited testimony established that defendant's attack was not preceded by any conduct by the victim, who was walking away from defendant, that would support a reasonable belief that the use of physical force against defendant was imminent (<i>see People v Goetz</i>, 68 NY2d 96, 114-115 [1986]).</p><p>Defendant's request for a missing witness charge, made after both sides rested, was untimely (<i>see People v Patten</i>, 232 AD2d 276 [1996], <i>lv denied </i>89 NY2d 988 [1997]). In any event, there is no indication that the nontestifying victim, who was also prosecuted for his conduct in the incident, was under the People's control for purposes of a missing witness charge <font color="FF0000">[*2]</font>(<i>see People v Gonzalez</i>, 68 NY2d 424, 428-429 [1986]; <i>see also People v Macana</i>, 84 NY2d 173, 178 [1994]). </p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: April 24, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      OF **

**CHIEF      FINANCIAL OFFICER **

**UNDER      SECTION 906 OF THE **

**SARBANES        OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

| (1) | the                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                  Richard A. Robert                                                                                                                                 |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Richard                  A. Robert                                                                                                                                     |
| Executive                  Vice President andChief                  Financial Officer(Principal                  Financial Officer) May                  12, 2008 |

----
EXHIBIT 35.2

                    SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)

                               GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC

                RAMP SERIES 2007-RZ1 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of GMAC Mortgage,  LLC, as servicer
(the "Servicer")  pursuant to the applicable  servicing  agreement,  does hereby
certify that:

1. A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during  the  period  covered  by the
Issuing Entity's report on Form 10-K and of the Servicer's performance under the
applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing agreement in all material
respects  throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 24th
day of March 2008.


By:   /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      Name:   Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:  Executive Vice President
#### Kate Hartman, Respondent, v. Peter Hartman, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion hy

Brady, J,
#### Stephen R. Ryan, as Receiver, etc., Appellant, v. Charles H. Sage, Respondent.

Judgment of the County Court of Jefferson county affirming justice’s judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Boardman, J.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-10918

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LUIS ZAMORA-MAGDALENO, also known as Roberto Madero-Sanchez

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:07-CR-10-1

Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Luis Zamora-Magdaleno

raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States,

523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty

provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. PinedaArrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 2008 WL 59441 (Jan.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

January 30, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-10918

2

7, 2008) (No. 07-6202). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is

GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 35.3

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (Item 1123)

Homecomings Financial, LLC

RFMSI Series 2007-SA1 Trust (the Issuing Entity)

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Homecomings Financial, LLC, as servicer (the Servicer) pursuant to the applicable servicing agreement, does hereby certify that:

1. A review of the Servicers activities during the period from and including January 30, 2007 through and including September 24, 2007 and of the
Servicers performance under the applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such
review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout such period.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 24th day of March 2008.



|       |  |                     
|------ |  | --------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
|Name:  |  | Anthony N. Renzi    
|Title: |  | Managing Director
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13728 Filed: 05/12/23 Entered: 05/12/23 15:17:34 Page 1

of 5

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13734-1 Filed: 05/15/23 Entered: 05/15/23 14:25:15 Page 1
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13728 Filed: 05/12/23 Entered: 05/12/23 15:17:34 Page 2

of 5

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13734-1 Filed: 05/15/23 Entered: 05/15/23 14:25:15 Page 2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13728 Filed: 05/12/23 Entered: 05/12/23 15:17:34 Page 3

of 5

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13734-1 Filed: 05/15/23 Entered: 05/15/23 14:25:15 Page 3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13728 Filed: 05/12/23 Entered: 05/12/23 15:17:34 Page 4

of 5

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13734-1 Filed: 05/15/23 Entered: 05/15/23 14:25:15 Page 4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13728 Filed: 05/12/23 Entered: 05/12/23 15:17:34 Page 5

of 5

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13734-1 Filed: 05/15/23 Entered: 05/15/23 14:25:15 Page 5
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4284    Filed: 10/18/19    Entered: 10/18/19 12:20:09    Page 1 of2

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4284    Filed: 10/18/19    Entered: 10/18/19 12:20:09    Page 2 of2
#### David Donahue, Appellant, v. John H. Drake and William D. Stratton, Respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, CoreyHenry, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2021-1(the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. Basedon my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement inall material respects; and 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included inthis report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells FargoBank, N.A. and Computershare Trust Company, N.A. 

 
By: 
/s/ Corey Henry
Name: Corey HenryTitle: President and Chief Executive Officer Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)Date: March 29, 2024**
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3403-3    Filed: 08/07/19    Entered: 08/07/19 09:18:07    Page 1of 1
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Cathy Yanni (SBN 105036) 

JAMS 

Two Embarcadero Center 

Suite 1500 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: 415-774-2635 

Facsimile: 415-982-5287 

Email: cathy@cathyyanni.com 

Administrator of the Wildfire Assistance Program 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION 

- and -

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, 

Debtors. 

 Affects PG&E Corporation

 Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company

 Affects Both Debtors

This Document Relates to All Cases 

Bankruptcy Case 

No. 19-30088 

Chapter 11 

(Lead Case) 

(Jointly Administered) 

WILDFIRE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA 

Related Docket Nos.: 2223 and 2409 

Cathy Yanni, the court-appointed Administrator of the Wildfire Assistance Program 

established by the Court on May 23, 2019 [Docket No. 2233], submits the attached Declaration 

(Exhibit A) to apprise the Court, interested parties, and public on the implementation of her 

duties as Administrator, including developing specific eligibility requirements consistent with 

the Court’s June 5, 2019 Order [Docket No. 2409]. The Eligibility Criteria are attached as 

Exhibit B. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3556 Filed: 08/15/19 Entered: 08/15/19 11:48:42 Page 1 of

2
- 2 -

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Dated: August 15, 2019 

Respectfully submitted, 

By: /s/ Cathy Yanni

Cathy Yanni 

Administrator of the Wildfire Assistance

Program 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3556 Filed: 08/15/19 Entered: 08/15/19 11:48:42 Page 2 of

2
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. James Ervin BROWN and Thomas Jefferson Mitchell, Appellants.

No. 9881.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued July 1, 1965.

Decided July 9, 1965.

W. Farley Powers, Jr., Norfolk, Va., for appellant James Ervin Brown.

Calvin H. Childress, Norfolk, Va., for appellant Thomas Jefferson Mitchell.

Harold Gavaris, Asst. U. S. Atty. (C. V. Spratley, Jr., U. S. Atty.,- on brief), for appellee.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and BRYAN and BELL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the record and arguments of counsel, orally as well as on brief, we perceive no error of law or fact in the trial and conviction of the appellants. The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

Affirmed.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5280 

To strengthen the current protections available under the National Labor 

Relations Act by providing a private right of action for certain violations 

of such Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 30, 2014 

Mr. ELLISON (for himself, Mr. LEWIS, Mr. NADLER, Mr. GEORGE MILLER

of California, Ms. HAHN, Mr. DANNY K. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. SIRES, 

Mr. CONYERS, Ms. NORTON, Ms. FUDGE, Ms. BASS, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. TAKANO, Mr. HOLT, Mr. GRIJALVA, Ms. JACKSON LEE, and 

Mr. RYAN of Ohio) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Education and the Workforce, and in addition to the 

Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined 

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To strengthen the current protections available under the 

National Labor Relations Act by providing a private 

right of action for certain violations of such Act, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Employee Empower5 ment Act’’. 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5280 IH

1 SEC. 2. PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION UNDER THE NATIONAL 

2 LABOR RELATIONS ACT. 

3 Section 10 of the National Labor Relations Act (29 

4 U.S.C. 160) is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(n) In addition to filing a charge alleging an unfair 

7 labor practice with the Board in accordance with this Act, 

8 a person alleging an unfair labor practice by an employer 

9 in violation of section 8(a)(3) may, not later than 180 days 

10 after the date of such violation, bring a civil action in the 

11 appropriate district court of the United States against the 

12 employer for such violation. The court may grant any re13 lief described in section 706(g) of the Civil Rights Act of 

14 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e–5) or section 1977A(b) of the Re15 vised Statutes of the United States (42 U.S.C. 1981a(b)), 

16 and may allow the prevailing party a reasonable attorney’s 

17 fee (including expert witness fees) as part of the costs.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

MARIA ALICE LORCA VERAS and WALDERICO CLEMENCEU C. LORCA , Appellant s ,

v.

CHRISTOPHER NELS OSHER , Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 0582

[ October 25, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Cymonie Rowe , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2014

- CA

- 003155

- XXXX

- MB

.

Romaine Brown of Law Office of Romaine Brown PA, Port Saint Lucie, for appellants.

S. Brian Bull of Scott, Harris, Bryan, Barra & Jorgensen, P.A. , Palm Beach Gardens, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN , C IKLIN , JJ., and K ANNER , D ANIEL , Associate Judge, concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 5 (Friday, January 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 1113]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-131]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(Formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending December 12, 2009

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et seq.). The due date for Answers, 
Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below 
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2009-0329.
    Date Filed: December 9, 2009.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: December 30, 2009.
    Description: Application of Kalitta Air, L.L.C. requesting: (1) A 
certificate of public convenience and necessity authorizing it to 
provide scheduled foreign air transportation of property and mail 
between a point or points in the United States and a point or points in 
China, via intermediate points, and beyond China to any point or 
points; (2) an exemption to the extent necessary authorizing the 
service described above; (3) designation as the additional U.S.-flag 
carrier permitted effective March 25, 2010; (4) allocation of six of 
the 15 scheduled all-cargo frequencies that become available March 25, 
2010 or which are otherwise unused and available; (5) and motion to 
consolidate this application with the exemption application filed by 
Southern Air, Inc. to be considered contemporaneously.

Barbara J. Hairston,
Supervisory Dockets Officer, Docket Operations, Alternate Federal 
Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2010-131 Filed 1-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5386 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2014 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 11662 Gravois Road in St. Louis, Missouri, 

as the ‘‘Lt. Daniel P. Riordan Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5386 RFS

1 SECTION 1. LT. DANIEL P. RIORDAN POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 11662 Gravois Road in St. 

4 Louis, Missouri, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Lt. Daniel P. Riordan Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lt. Daniel P. Riordan 

10 Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 17, 

2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4939 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4939

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 2551 Galena Avenue in Simi Valley, California, as the ``Neil Havens 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NEIL HAVENS POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2551 Galena Avenue in Simi Valley, California, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Neil Havens Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Neil 
Havens Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 8, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4939

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 2551 Galena Avenue in Simi Valley, California, as the ``Neil Havens 
                             Post Office''.
```