alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EXHIBIT E 

 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3877-5 Filed: 09/11/19 Entered: 09/11/19 11:42:25 Page 1

of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Expenses 

Date Project Type Description Amount

6/18/2019 Berman Airfare Airfare to SF for settlement meeting. $758.60 

6/18/2019 Berman Taxi Taxi expense in SF for settlement meeting. $69.60 

6/19/2019 Berman Hotel Galleria Park Hotel -- Room and Taxes -- for settlement 

meeting in SF $457.74 

6/19/2019 Berman Taxi Taxi expense in SF for SF settlement meeting. $54.35 

6/19/2019 Berman Parking Parking expense at airport for SF settlement meeting. $60.00 

TOTALS $1,400.29

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3877-5 Filed: 09/11/19 Entered: 09/11/19 11:42:25 Page 2

of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

The National Science Board's Committee on Strategy and Budget, pursuant to NSF regulations (45 CFR part 614), the National Science Foundation Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1862n-5), and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the scheduling of meetings for the transaction of National Science Board business and other matters specified, as follows: 

# Date and Time:

Tuesday, June 15, 2010 at 12 Noon. 

# Subject Matter:

                        Discussion of proposed NSF budgets and other committee business as reflected in the notice of closure and certification found at:                         *http://www.nsf.gov/​nsb/​meetings/​2010/​0615/​closing.pdf.*

# Status:

Closed. 

                        This meeting will be held by teleconference originating at the National Science Board Office, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Please refer to the National Science Board Web site (                        *http://www.nsf.gov/​nsb*) for information or schedule updates, or contact: Jennie Moehlmann, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-7000.                     

Ann Ferrante, 

Writer-Editor.

[FR Doc. 2010-13504 Filed 6-2-10; 11:15 am] 

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 4340    Filed: 10/21/19    Entered: 10/21/19 12:53:27    Page 1 of1
#### Board of Managers of Revere Condominium, Respondent, v Shahsultan Jaffer, Appellant.

Submitted December 26, 1995;

decided February 15, 1996

Appeal transferred, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, *sua sponte,*to the Appellate Division, First Department, upon the ground that a direct appeal does not lie when questions other than the constitutional validity of a statutory provision are involved (NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b] [2]; § 5 [b]; CPLR 5601 [b] [2]). Motion for a stay, etc., dismissed as academic.
#### Isabella K. Arnold and another, Respondents, v. George A. Green, Appellant.

Judgment modified as indicated in the opinion of Bradley, J., and as so modified affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff.

Opinion by

Bradley J.;

Smith, P. J., not sitting.
#### CAROLINA DRIVE-UR-SELF, INC., v. JAMES B. MAIDEN, Trading and Doing Business Under the Firm Name and Style of ALLIED ROOFING COMPANY.

(Filed 22 September, 1954.)

Appeal, by defendant from *Whitmire, Special Judge,*July Conflict “A” Term 1954 of BuNcombe.

Civil action to recover on rental contract of *8$*per mile, plus $25.00 per week and 3% sales tax thereon, on automobiles rented and used by tbe defendant from tbe plaintiff. Tbe General County Court of Buncombe County entered judgment for tbe plaintiff in tbe exact amount prayed for in tbe complaint. Tbe defendant appealed to tbe Superior Court, which court overruled each and every one of tbe defendant’s assignments of error and in all respects affirmed tbe judgment of tbe General County Court.

Tbe defendant appealed to tbe Supreme Court assigning errors.

*Ward ■& Bennett for Plaintiff, Appellee.*

*S. J. Pegram and William J. Cocke for Defendant, Appellant.*

Per Ctfeiam.

Due and careful consideration has been given to each assignment of error presented by tbe appellant on this appeal, and we find no error in tbe trial below of sufficient merit to warrant a disturbance of tbe judgment entered in tbe Superior Court. Tbe facts are simple. Tbe applicable rules of law well established. There is no need for *630further discussion. All the defendant’s assignments of error are overruled, and the judgment below is

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6121

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

CESAR SIERRO-PINEDA, a/k/a Desiderio Ramirez Duarte, a/k/a 

Desiderio Pineda Duarte,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. 

Voorhees, District Judge. (5:11-cr-00022-RLV-1; 5:14-cv-00063-

RLV)

Submitted: June 18, 2015 Decided: June 22, 2015

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cesar Sierro-Pineda, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Cesar Sierro-Pineda seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. We dismiss 

the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal 

was not timely filed. 

When the United States or its officer or agency is a party, 

the notice of appeal must be filed no more than 60 days after 

the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order, Fed. 

R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely 

filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional 

requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on 

October 14, 2014. The notice of appeal was filed on January 16, 

2015.*

 Because Sierro-Pineda failed to file a timely notice of 

appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal 

period, we dismiss the appeal. We grant Sierro-Pineda’s motion 

* For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date 

appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could 

have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to 

the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 

(1988). Although Sierro-Pineda first dated his notice of appeal 

December 14, 2014, he changed the date to January 16, 2015, and 

initialed the change. Under either date, the notice of appeal 

is untimely filed.

2

 
to extend the filing time for the informal opening brief and 

accept the tendered brief. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

DISMISSED

3
32(ii)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Monroe Bancorp (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gordon M. Dyott,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.




/s/ Gordon M. Dyott
------------------------
Gordon M. Dyott
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
August 7, 2007


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed for any other purpose.
Exhibit 32.2




SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION




I, Edwin F. Heinen, Chief Financial Officer of Glowpoint, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1)   The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: May 13, 2010




/s/ Edwin F. Heinen


Edwin F. Heinen


Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to Glowpoint, Inc. and will be retained by Glowpoint, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4106 Filed: 10/03/19 Entered: 10/04/19 10:51:47 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4106 Filed: 10/03/19 Entered: 10/04/19 10:51:47 Page 2 of

2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6964

RICHARD DAVID COOPER; GEORGE WILSON; JOHN

TRIPPETT; JAMES BRITTON; KENNEY EDWARDS;

WILLIAM YOUNG; HENRY DAVIS; GARY BRIGHT;

GREGORY HAMILTON; CHARLES HILL; ANTHONY

PRESSBERRY; BRIAN STOKELING; IRVIN BURNS, JR.;

THOMAS MATTINGLY; VINCIN HARPSTER; HENRY

HARRIS; JESSE COBBS; JONATHAN BORK; JOHN

CARTER; CHARLES WRIGHT; WILLIAM BAKER-EL;

LOWELL D. HOWELL; DONALD FITZGERALD

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

and

EVERETTE PRATT,

Plaintiff,

versus

PRISON HEALTH SERVICE, INCORPORATED; PHARMACY

SERVICES, INCORPORATED; MARYLAND DIVISION OF

CORRECTION,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, Chief District Judge.

(CA-01-1428-S)

Submitted: December 12, 2001 Decided: January 11, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard David Cooper, George Wilson, John Trippett, James Britton,

Kenney Edwards, William Young, Henry Davis, Gary Bright, Gregory

Hamilton, Charles Hill, Anthony Pressberry, Brian Stokeling, Irvin

Burns, Jr., Thomas Mattingly, Vincin Harpster, Henry Harris, Jesse

Cobbs, Jonathan Bork, John Carter, Charles Wright, William

Baker-El, Lowell D. Howell, Donald Fitzgerald, Appellants Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court’s order dismissing their

42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) medical treatment claim. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Further, we decline to review Appellants’

claims raised for the first time on appeal. See Muth v. United

States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See Cooper v. Prison Health

Servs., No. CA-01-1428-S (D. Md. May 23, 2001). We deny Appellants’ motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit
13.1









The
certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual
Report on Form 20-F of Cellcom Israel Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2008
(the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule
15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.




Amos
Shapira, the Chief Executive Officer and Tal Raz, the Chief Financial Officer of
Cellcom Israel Ltd., each certifies that:




1.
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Exchange Act; and




2.
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cellcom
      Israel Ltd..




Date: March
2, 2009




/s/
      Amos ShapiraName: 
      Amos ShapiraChief
      Executive Officer





/s/
      Tal RazName: Tal
      RazChief
      Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of XenaCare Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bobby Story, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ Bobby Story        
| | Bobby Story            
| | Chief Financial Officer
| | April 15, 2011
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EXHIBIT B

COMPENSATION BY WORK TASK CODE FOR

SERVICES RENDERED BY CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP

FOR THE PERIOD JUNE 1, 2019 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2019

TASK

CODE DESCRIPTION HOURS AMOUNT

ADMN Case Administration (Incl. Docket Updates and Case Calendar) 130.80 $39,188.00

ASST Use and Sale of Assets, Including 363 Sales 1.20 1,800.00

AUTO Automatic Stay 1.60 1,632.00

BARN Bar Date and Claims Noticing Matter 50.50 53,504.50

CASE General Case Strategy 290.40 273,023.00

CASH Financing / Cash Collateral 4.80 5,464.00

COMM Committee Matters 221.70 157,644.50

CRAV Cravath Retention and Fee Application 457.10 273,589.50

CRED Creditor Inquiries 0.60 900.00

DSSV Disclosure Statement / Solicitation / Voting Matters 0 0.00

ECUL Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases 0 0.00

FEEO Retention and Fee Application of Non-Cravath Professionals 0.40 336.00

GOVR Corporate Governance and Securities Matters 160.90 166,519.50

HEAR Hearings and Court Matters 13.30 19,012.50

INVS Investigations 290.20 183,879.50

NONB Non-Bankruptcy Litigation 3,910.00 1,917,563.00

OCMS Other Contested Matters 0 0.00

OPRS Business Operations Matters 129.80 117,083.50

PLAN Plan of Reorganization / Plan Confirmation 12.80 19,200.00

PUBL Public Relations Strategy 30.80 31,750.00

REGS Regulatory & Legislative Matters 1,293.30 813,637.50

TRVL Non-Working Travel Time 297.70 239,928.50

USTM U.S. Trustee Matters / Meetings / Communications / Reports 2.20 3,300.00

WILD Wildfire Claims Matters 3,533.90 2,271,448.00

TOTAL 10,834.00 $6,590,403.50

* - Non-Working Travel Time billed at 50% discount.

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3892-2 Filed: 09/13/19 Entered: 09/13/19 15:40:55 Page 1

of 1
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 
 FORM
20-F/AAMENDMENT NO. 1
 
 (Mark One)
 o
    
    REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934ORþ
    
    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009
  o
    
    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934ORo
    
    SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 Date
of event requiring this shell company report
 Commission file number: 001-33398
 Simcere Pharmaceutical Group
 
  N/A
 
  Cayman Islands
 
  No. 699-18 Xuan Wu Avenue,
Xuan Wu District, Nanjing
Jiangsu Province 210042
Peoples Republic of China
 
  Zhigang Zhao
Chief Financial Officer
No. 699-18 Xuan Wu Avenue,
Xuan Wu District, Nanjing
Jiangsu Province 210042
Peoples Republic of China
Tel: (86) 25 8556 6666 x 8818
Fax: (86) 25 8547 7666
E-mail: zhaozhigang@simcere.com
 
  Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
 Title of Each Securities
    
    Name of Each Exchange on Which RegisteredAmerican Depositary Shares, each representing two
ordinary shares, par value $0.01 per share
    
    New York Stock Exchange
 Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
  
  Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:
 None
 
   o þ
 o þ
 þ o
 o o
  o þ o
  þ
 o
 o
 o o
 o þ
  o o




---



##### 



Table of Contents
 Item 5.
    
    Operating and Financial Review and ProspectsItem 19.
    
    ExhibitsEX-12.1EX-12.2EX-13.1EX-13.2
  i




---



##### Table of Contents



EXPLANATORY NOTE
    1




---



##### Table of Contents



Item 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
 Critical Accounting Policies and the Use of Estimates
 Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Goodwill
     December 31, 2009
 2




---



##### Table of Contents



3




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  Simcere Pharmaceutical GroupBy:
    /s/ Jinsheng RenName:
    Jinsheng RenTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer
|   | (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

|   | (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Richard A. Robert                                          |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Richard A. Robert                                              |
|   |                                                           |
|   | Executive Vice President and                                   |
|   | Chief Financial Officer                                        |
|   | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
|   |                                                           |
|   | March 8, 2011                                             |
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DIEMER & WEI, LLP 

Kathryn S. Diemer (#133977) 

100 West San Fernando Street, Suite 555 

San Jose, CA 95113 

Telephone: 408-971-6270 

Facsimile: 408-971-6271 

Email: kdiemer@diemerwei.com 

WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER LLP 

Matthew A. Feldman (admitted pro hac vice) 

Joseph G. Minias (admitted pro hac vice) 

Charles D. Cording (admitted pro hac vice) 

787 Seventh Avenue 

New York, NY 10019-6099 

Telephone: (212) 728-8000 

Facsimile: (212) 728-8111 

Email: mfeldman@willkie.com 

 jminias@willkie.com 

 ccording@willkie.com 

 

 

Counsel for Ad Hoc Group of Subrogation Claim Holders 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION, 

 

 -andPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, 

 Debtors. 

☐ Affects PG&E Corporation 

☐ Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company 

 Affects both Debtors 

* All papers shall be filed in the lead case, 

No. 19-30088 (DM)

Case No. 19-30088 DM 

Chapter 11 

(Lead Case) 

(Jointly Administered) 

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION 

FOR ADMISSION OF CHARLES D. 

CORDING PRO HAC VICE

Signed and Filed: November 13, 2019

________________________________________

DENNIS MONTALI

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

Entered on Docket 

November 13, 2019

EDWARD J. EMMONS, CLERK 

U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4707 Filed: 11/13/19 Entered: 11/13/19 15:22:45 Page 1 of

2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Charles D. Cording, whose business address and telephone number is 

WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER LLP 

Charles D. Cording 

787 Seventh Avenue 

New York, NY 10019-6099 

Telephone: (212) 728-8000 

Facsimile: (212) 728-8111 

Email: ccording@willkie.com 

Is an active member in good standing of the bar of New York, having applied in the above-entitled 

action for admission to practice in the Northern District of California on a pro hac vice basis, 

representing the Ad Hoc Group of Subrogation Claim Holders. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application is granted, subject to the terms and 

conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate appearance pro hac vice. 

Service of papers upon and communication with co-counsel designated in the application will 

constitute notice to the represented party. All future filings in this action are subject to the 

Bankruptcy Local Rules and Electronic Case Filing Procedures adopted by the United States 

Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California. 

** END OF ORDER ** 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4707 Filed: 11/13/19 Entered: 11/13/19 15:22:45 Page 2 of

2