alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

In connection with the Amendment No. 2 to Form 10-K of Geospatial Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the
year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Thomas R. Oxenreiter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|                      |  |  |  |    
|                      |  |  | 
|Date: October 9, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Thomas R. Oxenreiter
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Name:                    |  | Thomas R. Oxenreiter   
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Title:                   |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### GLOBE POSTER CORPORATION v. JOHN S. DAVIDSON, BISHOP DALE, et al., Partners, Trading as SOUTHEASTERN COLORED FAIR ASSOCIATION, CHARLOTTE, N. C., and SOUTHEASTERN COLORED FAIR ASSOCIATION, INC.

(Filed 19 May, 1943.)

Courts § 2d—

On appeal to the Superior Court from a judgment of a justice of the peace, defendants are entitled to a trial *de novo,*even when they are called and fail to appear.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Johnson, Special Judge,*at February Term, 1943, of Megelenburg.

*W. T. Shore for plaintiff, appellant.*

*Louis J. Hunter for defendants, appellees.*

Per Curiam.

This was a civil action instituted by the plaintiff against the defendants before a justice of the peace to recover for goods alleged to have been sold and delivered by the plaintiff to defendants. From an adverse judgment the defendants appealed and duly docketed their appeal in the Superior Court of Mecklenburg. In the Superior Court the defendants were called and failed to appear and prosecute their appeal, whereupon judgment by default was entered against the defend*213ants in favor of the plaintiff, without any trial *de novo.*Execution was issued upon the judgment so entered and the defendants lodged motion to restrain the sheriff from executing such execution and to vacate said default judgment. Upon hearing the defendants’ motion the restraining order was duly issued and the default judgment vacated; and the cause directed to he placed on the civil issue calendar for trial. From this order the plaintiff appealed, assigning error.

The defendants were entitled to- a trial *de novo.*Therefore, there was no error in striking out the default judgment entered against them and restraining action pursuant to an execution issued thereupon. C. S., 660; *Barnes v. R. R.,*133 N. C., 130, 45 S. E., 531. “. . . if the defendant fails to appear and make his defense, even when he has appealed, there must he a trial to entitle the plaintiff to a judgment, if the defendant has raised a material issue.” N. C. Prac. & Proc. (McIntosh), par. 703 (4). p. 817.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

JMP GROUP INC.

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

In
connection with the Annual Report of JMP Group Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Joseph A. Jolson, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for
the periods indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |                        
|------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                    |  | 
|Date: March 8, 2010 |  |  |  | /S/    JOSEPH A.
JOLSON
|                    |  |  |  | Joseph A. Jolson       
|                    |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically
incorporates it by reference.
19th August

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3595-1 Filed: 08/19/19 Entered: 08/19/19 12:24:42 Page 1

of 1
Exhibit 10.4


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO


WAIVER DATED MAY 31, 2016


 


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT
TO WAIVER (“First Amendment”) dated June 17, 2016 between Eastside Distilling, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
“Company”) and River North Equity, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company (“Holder”)
amends that certain Waiver dated May 31, 2016 between the Company and the Holder (the “Waiver”). The Company
and Holder are sometimes collectively referred to herein as the “Parties” or individually as a “Party.”
Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein will have the meaning set forth in the Waiver.


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, on
May 31, 2016, the Company and Holder entered into the Waiver pursuant to which the Holder agreed to waive the Potential Defaults
referred to therein so long as the Note was paid in full on or before the Waiver Termination Date of June 30, 2016.


 


WHEREAS, the
Parties desire to extend the Waiver Termination Date to July 1, 2016.


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
in consideration of the foregoing, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby
acknowledged, the Parties hereto agree as follows:


 


AGREEMENT


 


1.           Incorporation
of Recitals. The Recitals set forth above are herein incorporated into this First Amendment.


 


2.           Amendments.


 


a.          Extension
of Waiver Termination Date. The definition of Waiver Termination Date in Section 1(b) of the Waiver is hereby amended by
deleting “June 30, 2016” and inserting “July 1, 2016” in lieu thereof.


 


3.           Counterparts.
This First Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together
shall constitute one and the same instrument.


 




    1


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the Parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, have each executed this First Amendment on the dates set forth above.


 


	COMPANY:	EASTSIDE DISTILLING, INC.	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Steven Earles	 
	 	Name: Steven Earles	 
	 	Title:  Chief Executive Officer	 
	 	 	 	 
	HOLDER:	RIVER NORTH EQUITY, LLC	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/ Edward Liceaga	 
	 	Name: 	Edward Liceaga	 
	 	Title:	 President	 


 






    2
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund I (the Registrant) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the Report), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of the corporate General Partner of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate General Partner of the Registrant, hereby
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                          
|--------------------------
|                          
|/S/    LEO F. WELLS,
III  
|Leo F. Wells, III         
|Chief Executive Officer   
|August 10, 2006           
|                          
|/S/    DOUGLAS P.
WILLIAMS
|Douglas P. Williams       
|Chief Financial Officer   
|August 10, 2006
#### Board of Managers of Alfred Condominium, Respondent, v Carol Management, Inc., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants, and Jung/Brannen Associates, Architects, P. C., Appellant.

Submitted December 11,1995;

decided February 13, 1996

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Cross motion for the imposition of sanctions denied.
----

**SECTION      1350 CERTIFICATION**

| 1. | They                are the duly appointed Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting                Officer, respectively, of Northern Empire Bancshares, a California                Corporation (“the Company”); and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | To                their best knowledge and belief, the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form                10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, and to which the                Certification is attached as Exhibit 32, fully complies with the                requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                Act of                1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents,                in                all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of Northern Empire Bancshares. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Deborah A. Meekins                |   | /s/                Jane M. Baker        |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
| Deborah                A. Meekins                    |   | Jane                M. Baker            |
| President                and Chief Executive Officer |   | Chief                Accounting Officer |

----
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION

-andPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY,

Debtors.

Case No, 19-30088 (DM)

Chapter 11

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

TRANSFER OF CLAIM OTHER THAN FOR SECURITY

A CLAIM HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS CASE or deemed filed under 11 U.S.C. §1111 (a). Transferee hereby gives notice 

pursuant to Rule 3001(e) (2), Fed. R. Bankr. P., of the transfer, other than for security, of the claim referenced in this notice.

CONTRARIAN FUNDS, LLC

Name of Transferee

Address for all Communications/Notices:

CONTRARIAN FUNDS, LLC

411 WEST PUTNAM AVE., SUITE 425

GREENWICH, CT 06830

ATTN: ALISA MUMOLA

Phone: 203-862-8211

Fax: 203-485-5910

Email: tradeclaimsgroup@contrariancapital.com

Address for all Payments/Distributions:

CONTRARIAN FUNDS, LLC

ATTN: 392426

500 ROSS ST 154-0455

PITTSBURGH, PA 15262

COWEN SPECIAL INVESTMENTS LLC

Name of Transferor

Name and Current Address of Transferor:

COWEN SPECIAL INVESTMENTS LLC

599 LEXINGTON AVE., 21ST FLOOR

NEW YORK, NY 10022

ATTN: JEFFREY CARESS

I declare under penalty of perjury that the information provided in this notice

is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

By:_______/s/ Alisa Mumola_________

 Transferee/Transferee’s Agent

Date: July 9, 2019

Penalty for making a false statement: Fine of up to $500,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years, or both. 18 U.S.C. §§ 152 & 3571.

Schedule/Claim No. Creditor Name Amount Debtor Case No.

Schedule F Cowen Special Investments 

LLC

$228,070.00 Pacific Gas and Electric Company 19-30089

Claim No. 1101 Cowen Special Investments 

LLC

$228,070.00 Pacific Gas and Electric Company 19-30089

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2903 Filed: 07/09/19 Entered: 07/09/19 12:40:23 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2903 Filed: 07/09/19 Entered: 07/09/19 12:40:23 Page 2 of

2
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2392    Filed: 06/05/19    Entered: 06/05/19 11:48:27    Page 1 of8

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2392    Filed: 06/05/19    Entered: 06/05/19 11:48:27    Page 2 of8

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2392    Filed: 06/05/19    Entered: 06/05/19 11:48:27    Page 3 of8

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2392    Filed: 06/05/19    Entered: 06/05/19 11:48:27    Page 4 of8

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2392    Filed: 06/05/19    Entered: 06/05/19 11:48:27    Page 5 of8

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2392    Filed: 06/05/19    Entered: 06/05/19 11:48:27    Page 6 of8

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2392    Filed: 06/05/19    Entered: 06/05/19 11:48:27    Page 7 of8

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2392    Filed: 06/05/19    Entered: 06/05/19 11:48:27    Page 8 of8
A95A0764.

#### CANTRELL v. THE STATE.

(474 SE2d 769)

Decided July 17, 1996.

*Troy R. Millikan,*for appellant.

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Defendant’s conviction for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute was affirmed by this Court on direct appeal. See *Cantrell v. State,*217 Ga. App. 641 (459 SE2d 564). On certiorari, however, the Supreme Court of Georgia reversed, holding that the trial court should have entered a judgment of conviction only upon a charge of simple possession of cocaine as a lesser offense included within the indicted offense of possession with intent to distribute. *Cantrell v. State,*266 Ga. 700 (469 SE2d 660). Accordingly, the prior judgment of this Court is vacated and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this Court. The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the case'remanded with direction to enter judgment in accordance with the ruling of the Supreme Court of Georgia.

*Judgment reversed and case remanded with direction.*

*Andrews and Blackburn, JJ, concur.*

*337
      *Lydia J. Sartain, District Attorney, Lee Darragh, Thomas A. Gump, Assistant District Attorneys,*for appellee.
Second Department,

June Term, 1895.

#### James E. Boyd and Others, Respondents, v. Joseph H. Miller and Others, Appellants.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursem ents.—

Pratt, J.:

We think it sufficiently appears that the moving parties have acquired a lien on defendants’ property subsequent to the attachment. The affidavit of Matthews states that the sheriff has taken possession of the property of defendants under the attachment and is now in possession thereof, and that the execution of Matthews was thereafter duly issued and levied “ on the attached property.” That sufficiently describes the property and shows it to be now held subject to the two proceedings. We are thus brought to the question whether the attachment was granted upon sufficient grounds The attachment is stated to issue on the ground that defendants have assigned or disposed of, or are about to assign or dispose of, their property with intent to defraud their creditors. We think that the affidavits contain evidence from which the Special Term judge might fairly draw the inferences necessary to sustain the attachment. The .creditor recites his conversations with defendants; their statements and the contradictions of their sister, to whom they claimed to have transferred their assets, are given at length, and we cannot say that the conclusion was unwarranted that defendants intended to transfer their property in fraud of their creditors. Just what had. been done, and just what was intended to be done, it might not be easy to determine as the statements made were conflicting, but we think enough appeared to sustain the attachment. Order appealed from affirmed, with costs.

Dykman, J., concurred; Brown, P. J., not sitting.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 308 Filed: 02/05/19 Entered: 02/05/19 15:20:49 Page 1 of 2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 308 Filed: 02/05/19 Entered: 02/05/19 15:20:49 Page 2 of 2
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-2584

_____________________________

SCOTTIE BERNARD JENKINS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County.

John F. Simon, Judge.

July 27, 2018

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED.

WOLF, LEWIS, and RAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Bruce A. Miller, Public Defender, and Julie Comerford Wells, 

Assistant Public Defender, Milton; Andy Thomas, Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on April 26, 2010, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), INS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Accessible Portable Item Profile Project, Newton, MA; Fundacao Getulio Vargas, Centro Rio de Janeiro, BRAZIL; Kyung Hee Cyber University, Seoul, REPUBLIC OF KOREA; and Turning Technologies, Youngstown, OH, have been added as parties to this venture. Also, National Association of College Stores, Oberlin, OH, has withdrawn as a party to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On April 7, 2000, INS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on September 13, 2000 (65 FR 55283).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on February 16, 2010. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on March 24, 2010 (75 FR 14191) .                

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2010-13310 Filed 6-3-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE M
#### Clark S. Bennett, Respondent, v. Edmund R. Bell and another executor of Calvin H. Bell, deceased, Appellants.

— Judgment and order-affirmed, with costs.