alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. OLLEN B. HARRELL, Alias JAMES HARRELL, Alias JIMMIE HARRELL, and STATE-WIDE BAIL, INC.

(Filed 15 December, 1954.)

Arrest and Bail § 8—

Neither the solicitor nor the court is under duty to advise the surety on an appearance bond of the progress of the case in court, the surety being entitled only to notice of default given by service of the *soi. fa.*

Appeal by State-Wide Bail, Inc., from *Fountain, Special J.,*August Term 1954, CumberlaNd.

Affirmed.

Criminal prosecution, heard on motion of defendant’s surety on his appearance bond to vacate and set aside judgment absolute on the bond. 'The motion was denied and said surety appealed.

*Charles L. Abemeihy, Jr., for appellant, State-Wide Bail, Inc.*

*Coy E. Brewer and Robert IT. Dye for plaintiff appellee.*

Per Curiam.

At the December Term 1953, the court did nothing more than to accept defendant’s plea of guilty to a bill of indictment charging the crime of embezzlement. There is nothing in the record which indicates or suggests that the defendant was taken into custody or that defendant’s appearance bond, which is admittedly continuing in nature, was discharged. Neither the solicitor nor the court was duty bound to keep appellant advised of the progress of the case in court. It was only entitled to notice of default which was given by the service of a *sci. fa.*Hence, appellant’s answers assert no valid grounds for vacating the judgment absolute. The judgment denying the motion must be affirmed on authority of *S. v. Dew,*240 N.C. 595.

Affirmed.
EX-32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of Phoenix International Ventures, Inc. (the
"Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Zahir
Teja, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.











March
      31, 2010
            By:
            /s/
      Zahir TejaZahir
      TejaPresident
      and Chief Officer
#### Gerard A. Corsini, Appellant, v U-Haul International, Inc., Respondents.

Submitted January 16,1996;

decided February 20, 1996

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed as academic. Cross motion for the imposition of sanctions denied.
#### LLOYD JARRETT v. CITY OF ASHEVILLE.

(Filed 1 October, 1930.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *Oglesby, J.,*at August Term, 1930, of BuNcombe.

Controversy without action submitted on an agreed statement of facts.

From a judgment against tbe plaintiff be appeals.

*J. Scroop Styles for plaintiff.*

*George Fennel, Chas. N. Malone and Chas. Earl Jones for defendant.*

Stacy, C. J.

Tbis is a companion case to *Green v. Asheville, ante,*516, and is controlled by wbat was said in tbat case, tbe only dis-tinguisbment in tbe fact situations of tbe two eases being tbat in tbe present case the plaintiff resides in wbat was formerly tbe town of Bilt-more, while tbe plaintiff in tbe *Green case*resides in wbat was formerly tbe town of Kenilworth. Tbe charters of both towns, Biltmore and Kenilworth, were repealed by tbe Greater Asheville Extension Act, and tbe city of Asheville thereupon assumed all outstanding obligations and liabilities of said towns and succeeded to all their assets, revenues, taxes, assessments, etc.

Affirmed.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 18-526V 

Filed: April 30, 2019

UNPUBLISHED

JESSICA MISKELL, 

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Special Processing Unit (SPU); 

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA)

Gary Alan Krochmal, Law Offices of Gary A. Krochmal, PLLC, Farmington Hills, MI), for 

petitioner.

Adriana Ruth Teitel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

On April 10, 2018, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National 

Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2 (the “Vaccine 

Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine 

administration (“SIRVA”) following receipt of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine on October 4, 

2015. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office 

of Special Masters.

On April 29, 2019, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report

 

1 The undersigned intends to post this ruling on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This 

means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine 

Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the 

disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned 

agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from 

public access. Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this 

case, undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in 

accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management 

and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. 
at 1. Specifically, respondent concludes that petitioner’s medical course is consistent 

with a SIRVA as defined by the Vaccine Injury Table Id. at 5. Respondent further 

agrees that petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the 

Vaccine Act. Id. at 6.

In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the 

undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Nora Beth Dorsey

Nora Beth Dorsey

 Chief Special Master
Back to Contents

**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

In connection with the periodic report of Glowpoint, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, David C. Trachtenberg, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates of and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date:  May 13, 2005

|   | /s/ David C. Trachtenberg |
|--------|---------------------------|
|        |                           |
|   | David C. Trachtenberg     |
|   | Chief Executive Officer   |

----
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 18

- 00285

- CR

Manuel MONREAL

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 365th Judicial District Court, Dimmit County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17

- 10

- 03164

- DCRAJA

Honorable Amado J. Abascal, III, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR

WANT OF JURISDICTION.

SIGNED August 22, 2018.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez , Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from HCW Pension
Real Estate Fund Limited Partnership 1999 First Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000745538
<NAME> HCW PENSION REAL ESTATE FUND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,081
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      452
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (20)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          15,917
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,793)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,744
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,084
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,744
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   685
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   636
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        49
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.06<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 15




Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




The Board of Directors


Cellcom Israel Ltd:




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-141639) on Form S-8 of Cellcom Israel Ltd. of our report dated March 6, 2012, with respect to the consolidated statements of financial position of Cellcom Israel Ltd. And subsidiaries (“the Company”), as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2011, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, which report appears in Amendment No. 1 to the December 31, 2011 Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of Cellcom Israel Ltd.




Cellcom Israel Ltd. acquired Netvision Ltd. during 2011, and management excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, Netvision Ltd.’s internal control over financial reporting associated with total assets of NIS 886 million and total revenues constituting of NIS 381 million included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of the Company also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of Netvision Ltd.









Our report refers to the fact that the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011 have been translated into United States dollars (“dollars”) solely for the convenience of the reader. The consolidated financial statements expressed in New Israeli Shekels have been translated into dollars on the basis set forth in Note 2D to the consolidated financial statements..







Somekh Chaikin





Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)


Member Firm of KPMG International





Tel Aviv, Israel





March 14, 2012
NO. 07-02-0369-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL C

	SEPTEMBER 30, 2002

	_________________________________

	EX PARTE DARRICK MARCIANO KIZZEE

	_________________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.

	DISMISSAL

	Proceeding pro se, Darrick Marciano Kizzee filed a notice of appeal from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals’s dismissal of his application for writ of habeas corpus.  By letter dated September 13, 2002, this Court requested that Kizzee show why this Court has jurisdiction to entertain his purported appeal.  Kizzee responded by filing a document entitled “Court’s Jurisdiction.”  Although he cites several legal authorities, Kizzee does not reference any authority establishing that this Court has jurisdiction to hear an appeal of the dismissal by the higher court.  

	Accordingly, we dismiss this purported appeal for want of jurisdiction.

							Don H. Reavis

							      Justice

Do not publish.
#### Jeffrey S. Rotsko, Appellant, v Donald H. Rice, Respondent.

Submitted January 8, 1996;

decided March 21, 1996

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely *(see,*CPLR 5513 [b]).
Exhibit 32.2

            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE & FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Intercell
International  Corporation  for the quarter  ended June 30,  2005,  I, Kristi J.
Kampmann, Chief Financial Officer of Intercell International Corporation, hereby
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

        a.     such Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Intercell  International
               Corporation  for the quarter ended June 30, 2005,  fully complies
               with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
               Exchange Act of 1934; and

        b.     the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
               of Intercell International Corporation for the quarter ended June
               30,  2005,  fairly  presents,  in  all  material  respects,   the
               financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  Intercell
               International Corporation.




                                                   /s/Kristi J. Kampmann
                                                   ---------------------
                                                    Kristi J. Kampmann,
                                                       Chief Financial Officer


Date:      August 12, 2005



A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Intercell  International  Corporation  and  will  be  retained  by
Intercell International Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>



                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                (CHAPTER 63, TITLE 18 U.S.C. SS.1350(A) AND (B))


                  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. ss.1350(a) and (b)), each of the undersigned hereby
individually certifies in his capacity as an officer of Metaldyne Corporation
(the "Company") that the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in
such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company at the end of and for the periods
covered by such Report.


Dated:  August 14, 2002               /s/ TIMOTHY D. LEULIETTE
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Timothy D. Leuliette
                                      Chief Executive Officer


                  The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350(a) and (b)), is not a part of the Form 10-Q to which it refers and is,
to the extent permitted by law, provided by each of the above signatories to the
extent of his respective knowledge.
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: January 26, 2017 522820 

________________________________

In the Matter of JOHNATHAN 

JOHNSON,

Appellant,

v

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, as Acting

Commissioner of Corrections

and Community Supervision,

Respondent.

________________________________

Calendar Date: November 29, 2016

Before: Peters, P.J., Rose, Devine, Clark and Aarons, JJ.

__________

Johnathan Johnson, Malone, appellant pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Martin A.

Hotvet of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Feldstein,

J.), entered February 29, 2016 in Franklin County, which, in a

proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, among other things,

granted respondent's motion to dismiss the petition.

Petitioner, an inmate, claimed that he was improperly

denied a religious meal on February 26, 2015 while he was

confined in his cell. He filed a grievance disputing the matter,

but was advised by the Central Office Review Committee that his

name was on the list of inmates who were to receive the religious

meal. He then made a request under the Freedom of Information

Law (see Public Officers Law art 6 [hereinafter FOIL]) for

disclosure of the logbook containing the names of the correction

officers assigned to his special housing unit when he was
-2- 522820 

allegedly denied the religious meal so that he could name them in

a civil rights action. His request was denied and he filed an

administrative appeal. When his administrative appeal was not

timely decided, he commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding in

the nature of mandamus to compel disclosure. Thereafter, his

administrative appeal was decided and he was provided with the

logbook, the only redaction being the inmates' names. Names of

the officers on duty were not redacted. In light of this

disclosure, respondent moved to dismiss the petition as moot. 

Petitioner, in turn, cross-moved to convert the proceeding to one

for preaction discovery under CPLR 3102 (c). Supreme Court

granted respondent's motion and denied petitioner's cross motion. 

Petitioner now appeals.

We affirm. The petition is clearly moot as disclosure of

the logbook provided petitioner with the names of the correction

officers on duty during the relevant time period and he has,

thus, received all of the relief that he requested and to which

he is entitled (see Matter of DeFreitas v New York State Police

Crime Lab, 141 AD3d 1043, 1044 [2016]). In view of this, there

is no basis upon which to convert the proceeding to one for

preaction disclosure under CPLR 3102 (c). 

Peters, P.J., Rose, Devine, Clark and Aarons, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
- Home
      - Grants          - Project Grants
        - Technical Assistance Grants
        - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
        - Strategic Initiatives Grants
        - Education Support Program
        - Funding Toolkit 
      - News
      - Grantee Spotlights
      - Priority Investment Areas          - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
      - Grant Management
      - About SJI          - Board of Directors
        - Executive Director
        - Past Members
        - SJI Budget 

                  - Home
                  - Grants                      - Project Grants
                    - Technical Assistance Grants
                    - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
                    - Strategic Initiatives Grants
                    - Education Support Program
                    - Funding Toolkit 
                  - News
                  - Grantee Spotlights
                  - Priority Investment Areas                      - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
                  - Grant Management
                  - About SJI                      - Board of Directors
                    - Executive Director
                    - Past Members
                    - SJI Budget 

### Supporting the Nation's Judicial System & the Public it Serves

#### 					ANNOUNCEMENT				

## The ICM Fellows Application is Open!

What does being a Fellow mean to the court community? CCJ and COSCA described the importance of the Fellows program in a joint resolution. The resolution recognizes Fellows as important court leaders, the importance of Fellows projects in improving the administration of justice, and Fellows “as a symbol of professional expertise and individual commitment to excellence in service.”

For more information and to apply, please visit: Prospective Fellows | NCSC

Please reach out to icmfellows@ncsc.org with any questions.

### 

                    - ICM-Fellows  (24 kB)

#### LATEST NEWS & ANNOUNCEMENTS

                  -  Trauma-Informed Practices for Criminal Courts: Implementation Opportunities  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Visits The National Judicial College  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Board Awards FY 2024 Second Quarter Grants  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Visits The National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges  Read More**   

#### CONTACT US

          contact@sji.gov
                       Tel: 703.660.4979

#### HEADQUARTERS

                       State Justice Institute
                       12700 Fair Lakes Circle, Suite 340
                       Fairfax, VA 22033         

Website design by Segue Technologies, Inc.

            -  ** 
            -  **  **
Exhibit
13.1




Certification
by the Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of JA Solar Holdings Co., Ltd.
(the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peng
Fang, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date: May
3, 2010




By:
            /s/
      Peng FangName:
            Peng
      FangTitle:
            Chief
      Executive Officer