alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5389 

To amend the National Marine Sanctuaries Act to prescribe an additional 

requirement for the designation of marine sanctuaries off the coast of Alaska. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 31, 2014 

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the National Marine Sanctuaries Act to prescribe 

an additional requirement for the designation of marine 

sanctuaries off the coast of Alaska. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AUTHORITY TO DESIGNATE 

4 MARINE SANCTUARIES. 

5 Section 303 of the National Marine Sanctuaries Act 

6 (16 U.S.C. 1433) is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘The Sec8 retary may’’ and inserting ‘‘Subject to subsection 

9 (c), the Secretary may’’; and 

10 (2) by adding at the end the following: 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5389 IH

1 ‘‘(c) LIMITATION.—The Secretary may not designate 

2 as a national marine sanctuary any area of the marine 

3 environment off the coast of Alaska seaward of the high 

4 tide line unless an Act of Congress— 

5 ‘‘(1) requires the Secretary to make such a des6 ignation; and 

7 ‘‘(2) prescribes the boundaries of the area to be 

8 given such designation by the Secretary.’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT E

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3105-5 Filed: 07/19/19 Entered: 07/19/19 15:37:40 Page 1

of 5
62819163

Jan 03 2019 

02:37PM

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3105-5 Filed: 07/19/19 Entered: 07/19/19 15:37:40 Page 2

of 5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3105-5 Filed: 07/19/19 Entered: 07/19/19 15:37:40 Page 3

of 5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3105-5 Filed: 07/19/19 Entered: 07/19/19 15:37:40 Page 4

of 5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3105-5 Filed: 07/19/19 Entered: 07/19/19 15:37:40 Page 5

of 5
LDK SOLAR CO., LTD.
 List of Subsidiaries
 Name
    
    Place of incorporationAnhui LDK New Energy Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaIAS
Electronics (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaInternational Assembly Solutions Limited
    
    Hong KongJiangxi LDK PV Silicon Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaJiangxi LDK Solar Hi-Tech Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaJiangxi LDK Solar Polysilicon Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaLDK Silicon & Chemical Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    Cayman IslandsLDK Silicon Holding Co., Limited
    
    Hong KongLDK
Solar Europe Holding S.A.
    
    LuxemburgLDK Solar Hi-Tech (Hefei) Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaLDK Solar Hi-Tech (Hong Kong) Co., Limited
    
    Hong KongLDK Solar Hi-Tech (Nanchang) Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaLDK Solar Hi-Tech (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaLDK Solar Hi-Tech (Xinyu) Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaLDK Solar International Company Limited
    
    Hong KongLDK Solar Power Technology (Xinyu) Engineering Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaLDK Solar Tech USA, Inc.
    
    California, U.S.A.LDK Solar USA, Inc.
    
    California, U.S.A.LQ energy GmbH
    
    GermanySolar
Power, Inc.
    
    California, U.S.A.Solar
Tax Partners 2, LLC
    
    California, U.S.A.North
Palm Springs Investments, LLC
    
    California, U.S.A.LDK
Trading Service Germany
    
    GermanyLDK
Service Italia S.r.l.
    
    ItalySolar
Green Technology S.p.A.
    
    ItalyLD
Green S.r.l
    
    ItalyLD
Vert S.r.l.
    
    ItalyLES
S.r.l
    
    ItalyMi.Ca.
Solare S.r.l.
    
    ItalyLDK
Solar Power Technology (Hefei) Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaLDK
Optronics Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaNanchang
LDK Solar Power Engineering Co., Ltd.
    
    China
mSTRIC T ATTORNEY' S OFFIC E 

33-° & 4St4" Judicia l District s 

COUMTIE S O F 

IMLANCO . BUBNS T • IXAN O • SA N SAB A 

Wiley B. McAfee 

District Attorney 

3uly 08, 2015 

Mr. Jeffery D. Kyle 

Clerk of Court of Appeals 

P. O. Box 12457 

Austin, TX 78711 

Re: Case No. 03-15-00299-CR; Jannes Bradley Warden v. The State of Texas 

Appeal from Cause No. 41101 in the 424th District Court of Burnet County 

Dear Mr. Kyle: 

Please accept this letter as our designation of Lead Counsel for the State of 

Texas, Appellee, in the above described case. Lead Counsel for this case is: 

Gary W. Bunyard 

Assistant District Attorney 

P.O. Box 725 

Llano, TX 78643 

(325) 247-5755 (voice) 

(325) 247-5274 (fax) 

g.bunyard@co.llano.tx. us 

Texas State Bar No. 03353500 

Sincerely, 

G^iy'W.^nyard 

Assistant District Attorney 

cc: Ms. Paula Michelle Moore 

Attorney for Appellant 

1008 n. Water St. 

Burnet, TX 78611 

811 Befiy Street • P.O. Box 726 • Uarw. Texas 78843 • 325-247-5755 • Fax 325-247-5274 

ACCEPTED

03-15-00299-CR

5979593

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

7/8/2015 1:14:44 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 7/8/2015 1:14:44 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
EXHIBIT 99
                                   ----------

            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE & FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Intercell
International  Corporation  for  the  quarter  ended  March 31, 2003, I, Paul H.
Metzinger,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Chief Financial Officer of Intercell
International Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, to my
knowledge,  that:

     (1)  such  Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-QSB  of  Intercell International
          Corporation  for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, fully complies with
          the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
          Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  the  information  contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
          Intercell  International  Corporation  for the quarter ended March 31,
          2003,  fairly  presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition  and  results  of  operations  of  Intercell  International
          Corporation.




                                                 /s/Paul H. Metzinger
                                                 ------------------------------
                                                 Paul H. Metzinger, Chief
                                                 Executive Officer & Chief
                                                 Financial Officer


Date: May 14, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Intercell International Corporation and will be retained by
Intercell International Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>
Exhibit 99.2


			   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
		 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of MidSouth
Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the
period ending June 30, 2002 (the "Report"), I, Karen Hail,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:

	(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

	(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.



________________________
Karen Hail
Chief Financial Officer
August ____, 2002
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BAKER 

&

HOSTETLER LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

Robert A. Julian (SBN 88469) 

Cecily A. Dumas (SBN 111449) 

BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP 

1160 Battery Street, Suite 100 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: 628.208.6434 

Facsimile: 310.820.8859 

Email: rjulian@bakerlaw.com 

Email: cdumas@bakerlaw.com 

Eric E. Sagerman (SBN 155496) 

Lauren T. Attard (SBN 320898) 

BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP 

11601 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1400 

Los Angeles, CA 90025-0509 

Telephone: 310.820.8800 

Facsimile: 310.820.8859 

Email: esagerman@bakerlaw.com 

Email: lattard@bakerlaw.com 

Counsel to the Official Committee of Tort Claimants 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION 

-andPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, 

 Debtors. 

□ Affects PG&E Corporation 

□ Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company 

■ Affects both Debtors 

*All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case, 

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Bankruptcy Case 

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Chapter 11 

(Lead Case) 

(Jointly Administered) 

ERRATA SHEET REGARDING 

OPPOSITION OF THE OFFICIAL 

COMMITTEE OF TORT CLAIMANTS 

TO THE DEBTORS’ MOTION 

PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. §§ 105(a) AND 

502(c) FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF 

WILDFIRE CLAIMS ESTIMATION 

PROCEDURES [Dkt. No. 3091] 

Date: August 14, 2019 

Time: 9:30 a.m. (Pacific Time) 

Place: United States Bankruptcy Court 

 Courtroom 17, 16th Floor 

 San Francisco, CA 94102 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3448 Filed: 08/07/19 Entered: 08/07/19 17:06:59 Page 1 of

2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BAKER 

&

HOSTETLER LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

 - 2 - 

The Official Committee of Tort Claimants hereby submits this errata sheet with regard to 

its Opposition [Dkt No. 3431], to the motion [Dkt. No. 3091] filed by the Debtors pursuant to 

Sections 105(a) and 502(c) of title 11 of the United States Code for the establishment of wildfire 

claims estimation procedures: 

Page 17, line 10 is amended to delete the word “non-”. Page 17, lines 10-12 to now read 

as follows: 

As explained next, this Court’s application of the Court of Appeal inverse precedent 

would permit the Court to estimate the economic damages that flow from that claim 

on a core basis, without de novo review by the district court, streamlining the 

estimation and plan process. 

Dated: August 7, 2019 

BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP 

By: /s/ Robert A. Julian 

Robert A. Julian 

Counsel to the Official Committee of Tort 

Claimants 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3448 Filed: 08/07/19 Entered: 08/07/19 17:06:59 Page 2 of

2
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20

- 890

_____________________________
W ARREN K. M ARTIN ,
Petitioner
,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

— Original Jurisdiction

.

September 30, 2020

P ER C URIAM

.

D ISMISSED as unauthorized. See Baker v. State , 878 So. 2d 1236, 1245 (Fla. 2004) (explaining that “[t]he remedy of habeas corpus is not available in Florida to obtain the kind of collateral postconviction relief available by motion in the sentencing court pursuant to rule 3.850”); Mills v. Dugger , 57 4 So. 2d 63, 65 (Fla. 1990) (“As we have stated numerous times, habeas corpus is not to be used for obtaining additional appeals of issues which were raised, or should have been raised, on direct appeal or which were waived at trial or which could have, sh ould have, or have been, raised in prior postconviction filings.” (internal marks omitted))

.
R AY , C.J., and B ILBREY and J AY , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Warren K. Martin, pro se
, Petitioner

. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Respondent

.
#### William A. Copp, as Executor, etc., Appellant, v. The Home Insurance Company, Respondent.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

Per Curiam:

The facts are undisputed, and from them it appears that tbe dwelling house which the defendant insured was vacant and unoccupied for a period of more than ten days prior to its burning.' A clause in the policy of insurance upon which this action is founded provides that in such event the policy shall be void. The complaint was, therefore, properly dismissed. The judgment and order sliould be affirmed, with costs.

Present — Van Brunt, P. J., O’Brien and Parker, JJ.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION and

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY,

Debtors.

Chapter 11

Case No. 19-30088 Chapter 11 (DM)

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

TRANSFER OF CLAIM OTHER THAN FOR SECURITY

A CLAIM HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS CASE or deemed filed under 11 U.S.C. § 1111(a). 

Transferee hereby gives evidence and notice pursuant to Rule 3001(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of 

Bankruptcy Procedure of the transfer, other than for security, of the claim referenced in this evidence and 

notice.

Olympus Peak Master Fund LP Gulf Interstate Engineering Company

Name of Transferee Name of Transferor

Phone: 212-373-1189

Last Four Digits of Acct #: N/A

Phone: 713-850-3447

Last Four Digits of Acct #: N/A

Name and Address where notices and payments to 

transferee should be sent: 

Leah Silverman

745 Fifth Avenue

Suite 1604

New York, NY 10151

Claim No: 3545

Case No.: Pacific Gas and Electric Company 

(19-30889)

Date Filed: July 8, 2019

Total Amount of Claim: $131,012.61

Transferred Amount of Claim: $131,012.61

I declare under penalty of perjury that the information provided in this notice is true and correct to the 

best of my knowledge and belief.

By: /s/ Leah Silverman Date: August 6, 2019

Transferee/Transferee's Agent

Penalty for making a false statement: Fine of up to $500,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years, or both. 

18 U.S.C. §§ 152 & 3571.

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3385 Filed: 08/06/19 Entered: 08/06/19 13:51:37 Page 1 of

2
 29

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3385 Filed: 08/06/19 Entered: 08/06/19 13:51:37 Page 2 of

2
[663 NE2d 906, 640 NYS2d 865]

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Dickerson, Appellant.

Decided January 16, 1996

*915APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*William Ramos,*New York City, and *Daniel Greenberg*for appellant.

*Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney*of Bronx County, Bronx *(Howard B. Sterinbach*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant was not entitled to be present at the side-bar conference held to determine whether his testimony "opened the door” to cross-examination about the underlying facts of a prior conviction previously precluded under a *Sandoval*ruling. The conference was not a material stage of the trial requiring defendant’s presence because the issue involved a purely legal discussion; it neither implicated defendant’s peculiar factual knowledge nor otherwise presented the potential for meaningful participation *(see, People v Rodriguez,*85 NY2d 586, 591). Inasmuch as defense counsel did not object to the prosecutor’s cross-examination as to defendant’s guilt of the prior robbery on the ground that it exceeded the scope of the *Sandoval*ruling, defendant is precluded from later contending, on that ground, that the prosecutor cannot reap the benefit of defendant’s answer.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed in a memorandum.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 22, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, September 22, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A22I0027. BRAD E. LADNER et al. v. KENNETH WAYNE MARTIN et al. .

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2019CV330739
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EXHIBIT C 

EXPENSE SUMMARY 

FOR THE PERIOD JULY 1, 2019 THROUGH JULY 31, 2019 

EXPENSES AMOUNTS 

Meals $3,612.82 

Transportation 4,270.86 

Courier/Mail Services 2,502.27 

Duplicating 2,833.35 

Special Disbursements (including Experts) 979,934.38* 

Travel 65,266.41** 

Total Expenses Requested: $1,058,420.09 

* - Includes $34,344.95 for Experts who invoiced in July for services incurred in June. 

** - Hotel expenses have been capped for reimbursement purposes at $600.00/night. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4539-3 Filed: 10/31/19 Entered: 10/31/19 15:39:37 Page 1

of 1
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13041 Filed: 10/03/22 Entered: 10/04/22 12:22:09 Page 1

of 2
2

Instead, the Trust will continue to adhere to the procedures that the Court outlined in its June 10, 2021 order [Dkt. No.

10768] which the Court has, from the Trust’s perspective, continued to apply to Mr. Abrams’s Rule 2004 Motions.  That

is, if the Court would benefit from a response from the Trust (or any other person or entity) in considering Mr. Abrams’s

filings, prior to any hearing, the Trust or such person or entity will be given the opportunity to respond in writing at the

Court’s request.

Thank you for your and the Court’s consideration of this matter.

Respectfully submitted,

Gerard T. Cicero

Brown Rudnick LLP 

Seven Times Square 

New York, NY 10036 

T: 212.209.4939 

F: 212.938.2883

M: 732.757.1440 

gcicero@brownrudnick.com 

www.brownrudnick.com

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13041 Filed: 10/03/22 Entered: 10/04/22 12:22:09 Page 2

of 2
Professional Fees $ 4,690,442.50

Less 100% Travel Fees* (720,839.50)

Total Current Fees 3,969,603.00

Expenses 233,781.37

Total Invoice $ 4,203,384.37

*AP Services, LLC ("APS") has engaged in discussions with the United States Trustee with regard to a 

reasonable amount of compensation for non-working travel. Pending the resolution of such discussions, APS 

has not included any non-working travel charges in this Monthly Staffing and Compensation Report. APS 

is, therefore, submitting this Monthly Staffing and Compensation Report at this time, without prejudice to 

seeking compensation for such non-working travel in a subsequent filing.

Exhibit A

AP SERVICES, LLC

Summary of Compensation and Expenses – Pacific Gas and Electric Company, et al.

For the Period June 1, 2019 through June 30, 2019

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3357-1 Filed: 08/01/19 Entered: 08/01/19 16:05:01 Page 1

of 1
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

EX PARTE:

KELSEY FIELDS. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 18

- 00121

- CR

Appeal from the

384th District Court of

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20170D03143 and

2018DCV2228 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on Appellant’s motion to dismiss appeal, and

concludes the motion should be granted and the appeal should be dismissed, in accordance with

the opinion of this Court. We therefore dismiss the appeal. This decision sha ll be certified below

for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 27TH DAY OF JULY, 2018.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
Opinion issued November 6 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

————————————

NO. 01
- 15
- 00832
- CV

——————————— IN RE BERNADETTE PRE SLEY , Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, Ber nadette Presley, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, challenging the trial court’s order denying h er motion to exclude evidence from
trial

. 1
We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. All pending motions are denied

as moot.

1 The underlying case is Bernadette Presley v. Rudy Chevalier , cause number 2012

- 59031, pending in the 189th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable John Woolridge presiding.2 PER CURIAM
Panel consist s of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Brown.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5231 

To amend the Small Business Act to direct the task force of the Office 

of Veterans Business Development to provide access to and manage 

the distribution of excess or surplus property to veteran-owned small 

businesses. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 29, 2014 

Mr. BENTIVOLIO (for himself and Ms. DUCKWORTH) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To amend the Small Business Act to direct the task force 

of the Office of Veterans Business Development to provide access to and manage the distribution of excess 

or surplus property to veteran-owned small businesses. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Small Busi5 ness Enhancement Act of 2014’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5231 IH

1 SEC. 2. ACCESS TO EXCESS OR SURPLUS PROPERTY FOR 

2 VETERAN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESSES. 

3 Subparagraph (B) of section 32(c)(3) of the Small 

4 Business Act (15 U.S.C. 657b(c)(3)(B)) is amended— 

5 (1) in clause (v), by striking ‘‘; and’’ and insert6 ing a semicolon; 

7 (2) in clause (vi), by striking the period at the 

8 end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

9 (3) by inserting at the end the following new 

10 clause: 

11 ‘‘(vii) providing access to and man12 aging the distribution of excess or surplus 

13 property owned by the United States to 

14 small business concerns owned and con15 trolled by veterans, pursuant to a memo16 randum of understanding between the task 

17 force and the head of the appropriate State 

18 agency.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS