1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153-0119

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 

Stephen Karotkin (pro hac vice) 

(stephen.karotkin@weil.com) 

Ray C. Schrock, P.C. (pro hac vice) 

(ray.schrock@weil.com) 

Theodore Tsekerides (pro hac vice) 

(theodore.tsekerides@weil.com) 

Jessica Liou (pro hac vice) 

(jessica.liou@weil.com) 

Matthew Goren (pro hac vice) 

(matthew.goren@weil.com) 

New York, NY 10153-0119 

Tel: (212) 310-8000 

Fax: (212) 310-8007 

KELLER & BENVENUTTI LLP 

Tobias S. Keller (#151445) 

(tkeller@kellerbenvenutti.com) 

Peter J. Benvenutti (#60566) 

(pbenvenutti@kellerbenvenutti.com) 

Jane Kim (#298192) 

(jkim@kellerbenvenutti.com) 

650 California Street, Suite 1900 

San Francisco, CA 94108 

Tel: (415) 496-6723 

Fax: (415) 636-9251 

Attorneys for Debtors and Debtors in Possession 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION, 

 - and - 

Bankruptcy Case

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Chapter 11 

(Lead Case) (Jointly Administered) 

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION 

BETWEEN DEBTOR PACIFIC GAS AND 

ELECTRIC COMPANY AND MOVANTS 

MARINA AND MIKHAIL GELMAN FOR 

LIMITED RELIEF FROM THE 

AUTOMATIC STAY 

[Relates to Dkt. Nos. 1310, 3617] 

[Resolving Motion Set for Hearing 

September 25, 2019 at 9:30 am] 

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, 

 Debtors. 

 Affects PG&E Corporation 

 Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company 

 Affects both Debtors 

* All papers shall be filed in the lead case, 

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Signed and Filed: September 19, 2019

________________________________________

DENNIS MONTALI

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

Entered on Docket 

September 19, 2019

EDWARD J. EMMONS, CLERK 

U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3941 Filed: 09/19/19 Entered: 09/19/19 14:28:36 Page 1 of

3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

 Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153-0119

On consideration of the Stipulation Between Debtor Pacific Gas and Electric Company 

and Movants Marina and Mikhail Gelman for Limited Relief from the Automatic Stay, filed 

September 19, 2019 as Docket No. 3939 (the “Stipulation”), between Marina and Mikhail Gelman 

(the “Gelmans”) and Pacific Gas and Electric Company (the “Utility” or “Debtor”), one of the 

debtors and debtors in possession in the above-captioned chapter 11 cases (the “Chapter 11 

Cases”), entered in settlement of the Gelmans’ Motion for Relief from the Automatic Stay and 

Abstention Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1334(c)(1) [Dkt. 1310] and Supplement to Their Motion for 

Relief from the Automatic Stay and Abstention Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1334(c)(1); Objection to the 

Bankruptcy Court Adjudicating Movants’ Personal Injury Claims [Dkt. 3617] (together, the 

“Motion”); and this Court having jurisdiction to consider the Motion and the relief requested 

therein pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334, the Order Referring Bankruptcy Cases and 

Proceedings to Bankruptcy Judges, General Order 24 (N.D. Cal.), and Rule 5011-1(a) of the 

Bankruptcy Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 

and to consider the Stipulation and its provisions pursuant to that same authority and Federal Rule 

of Bankruptcy Procedure 4001(d)(4); and consideration of the Motion, the Stipulation and the 

requested relief being a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b); and venue being proper 

before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1408 and 1409; and the Court having found and 

determined that notice of the Motion as provided to the parties listed therein is reasonable and 

sufficient under the circumstances, and sufficient to afford reasonable notice of the material 

provisions of the Stipulation and opportunity for hearing; and it appearing that no other or further 

notice need be provided; and this Court having determined that the legal and factual bases set forth 

in the Motion establish just cause for approval of the Stipulation; and upon all of the proceedings 

had before this Court and after due deliberation and sufficient cause appearing therefor, and good 

cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. The Stipulation is approved. 

2. The Motion is resolved by stipulation. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3941 Filed: 09/19/19 Entered: 09/19/19 14:28:36 Page 2 of

3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

 Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153-0119

3. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to hear and determine all matters arising from or 

related to the implementation, interpretation, or enforcement of this Order. 

Approved: 

Dated: September 19, 2019 

LAW OFFICES OF BORIS E. EFRON

/s/ David W. Wessel 

David W. Wessel

Attorneys for Movants Marina Gelman and 

Mikhail Gelman 

* * * END OF ORDER * * * 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3941 Filed: 09/19/19 Entered: 09/19/19 14:28:36 Page 3 of

3