alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
23.1




Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




The Board
of Directors


Globe
Specialty Metals, Inc.:




We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(No. 333-162455) on Form S-8 of Globe Specialty Metals, Inc. of our reports
dated September 28, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of
Globe Specialty Metals, Inc. and subsidiary companies as of June 30, 2010 and
2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in
stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended June 30, 2010, and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of June 30, 2010, which reports appear in the June 30,
2010 annual report on Form 10-K of Globe Specialty Metals, Inc.




Our
report dated September 28, 2010, on the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of June 30, 2010, contains an explanatory paragraph that
states:




The
Company acquired Core Metals Group Holdings LLC (Core Metals) on April 1, 2010,
and management excluded Core Metals’ internal control over financial reporting
from its assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting as of June 30, 2010. The acquisition of Core Metals
contributed approximately 4.4 percent of the Company’s total revenue for the
year ended June 30, 2010 and accounted for approximately 8.2 percent of the
Company’s total assets as of June 30, 2010. Our audit of internal control over
financial reporting of the Company also excluded an evaluation of the internal
control over financial reporting of Core Metals.







/s/ KPMG
LLPNew York, New York


October
22, 2010
Exhibit 8.1
 SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
 
    
    State Good Group Limited, incorporated in the British Virgin Islands
    
    Master Luck Corporation, incorporated in Hong Kong, S.A.R.
    
    ChinaVax, incorporated in the Cayman Islands
    
    Pearl Ocean Holding Limited, incorporated in Samoa
    
    Simcere Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China
    
    Nanjing Simcere Dongyuan Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples
Republic of China
    
    Jiangsu Simcere Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of
China
    
    Shanghai Simcere Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of
China
    
    Jiangsu Simcere Pharmaceutical R&D Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic
of China
    
    Sichuan Zigong Yirong Industrial Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic
of China
    
    Hainan Qitian Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of
China
    
    Shandong Simcere Medgenn Bio-Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples
Republic of China
    
    Jilin Boda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China
    
    Jilin Boda Weiye Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, incorporated in the Peoples Republic of
China
    
    Nanjing Tung Chit Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic
of China
    
    Simcere Zhong Ren Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic
of China
    
    Jiangsu Yanshen Biological Technology Stock Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples
Republic of China
    
    Jiangsu Yanshen Biological Venture Capital Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples
Republic of China
    
    Nanjing Xiangao Investments Management Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic
of China
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I, Ryan Vyskocil, do declare and state as follows: 

1. I am a consultant at Prime Clerk, LLC, the claims and noticing agent for the debtors

PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company, in the above-referenced chapter 11 

bankruptcy cases.

2. On February 5, 2019, at my direction and under my supervision, employees of Prime

Clerk caused the following document to be served by first class mail on the service list attached 

hereto as Exhibit A:

 Motion of Debtors Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 105(A) and 362 for Interim and Final Orders 

Establishing Notification Procedures and Approving Restrictions on Certain Transfers of 

Stock of, and Claims Against, the Debtors [Docket No. 10] (the “NOL Motion”).

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 390 Filed: 02/08/19 Entered: 02/08/19 15:24:35 Page 1 of 4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 390 Filed: 02/08/19 Entered: 02/08/19 15:24:35 Page 2 of 4
Exhibit A 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 390 Filed: 02/08/19 Entered: 02/08/19 15:24:35 Page 3 of 4
Exhibit A

NOL Motion Service List

Served via First Class Mail

NAME ADDRESS 1 ADDRESS 2 CITY STA

Anchorage Capital Group, LLC 610 Broadway  New York NY Appaloosa, L.P. 404 WASHINGTON AVE MIAMI BEACH FL Hound Partners, LLC 101 Park Ave Floor 48 New York NY Lazard Asset Management, LLC 30 Rockfeller Plaza New York NY T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. 100 E. Pratt Street  Baltimore  MD The Baupost Group, LLC 1 SUMMER ST BOSTON MA 

The Vanguard Group, Inc. 100 Vanguard Blvd. Malvern PA 

In re:  PG&E Corporation, et al.Case No. 19‐30088 (DM) Page 1 of 1

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 390 Filed: 02/08/19 Entered: 02/08/19 15:24:35 Page 4
**Exhibit 15.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-149816) pertaining to 3SBio Inc.’s 2006 StockPlan, of our reports dated June 25, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of 3SBio Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of 3SBio Inc., included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for theyear ended December 31, 2009. 

/s/ Ernst & Young Hua Ming 

Beijing, People’s Republic of China 

June 25, 2010
#### FRANCIS McKENNA, Plaintiff in Error, *v.*THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Defendant in Error.

*Trial for homicide*— *character of deceased for violence*— *how proved.*

Writ of Error to the Court of General Sessions in the city and county of New York, to review the conviction of the relator of the crime of manslaughter in the third degree.

The death of the deceased was caused by a wound, which the evidence tended to show was produced by the discharge of a pistol in the hands of the prisoner.

The court at General Term said: “ During the progress of the trial the prisoner’s counsel inquired of a witness, who was a member of the police foi-ce, whether he had ever arrested the deceased ? This was objected *to;*and the prisoner’s counsel replied that he deshed to show the character of the deceased for violence, and that he had placed the prisoner in a position of self-defence, and while it was claimed that neither shot the deceased, it was still insisted that the prisoner had a right to show his character for violence. Whether the prisoner had this right or not, as the controversy was narrowed in this case, was not determined by the court, but the ruling was made simply and solely as to the question propounded to the witness. That question was overruled, and the prisoner’s counsel excepted. The court made no further ruling at this time, and did not hold that the prisoner could not show what the character or disposition of the deceased for violence had been, and the point was not again presented for consideration. The ruling, resting as it did exclusively upon the question which was asked, was proper. If the fact would have *581bad any relevancy at all to the case it would simply tend to prove an isolated act of misconduct on the part of the deceased, and that could not be shown in a case of this description to prove his disposition. Particular instances of misconduct of the deceased, in no way comiected with the accused, could not be proved for the mere purpose of showing a violent disposition on his part. The appropriate and proper mode of establishing that, if it be the fact, is by general evidence showing the character and disposition of the person who has been killed. *(Eggler*v. *The People,*56 N. Y., 642; *Thomas*v. *People,*67 id., 219, 223; *Jackson*v. *Osborn,*2 Wend., 555, 558.) Where the character of the deceased for violence may properly be proved in the case, general evidence is all that can be given, and that in certain cases may be appropriate and proper. *(.People*v. *Lamb,*2 Keyes, 360; Wharton’^ Criminal Law [4th ed.J, section 641.)”

*William F. Howe,*for the plaintiff in error. *Benj. K. Phelps,*district attorney, for the People.

Opinion by

DaNiels, J.

Brady, P. J., and INGAdls, J., concurred.

Conviction affirmed.
#### Commonwealth *v. Joy,*Appellant.

*Appeals*— Paper-books—Failure *to print evidence.*

On an appeal where the assignments of error relate to the rejection of evidence and it appears that the evidence is not printed in the paper-books, and there is nothing to identify as evidence certain exhibits printed in the affidavit of the appellant’s paper-book and relied upon by him, the judgment will be affirmed.

Argued Oct. 2, 1905.

Appeal, No. 63, April T., 1906, by defendant, from judgment of Q. S. Allegheny Co., June T., 1905, No. 166, on verdict of guilty in case of Commonwealth v. Frank Joy.

Before Rice, P. J., Beaver, Orlady, Smith, Porter, Morrison and Henderson, JJ.

Affirmed.

Indictment for conspiracy. Before Kennedy, P. J.

The opinion of the Superior Court states the case.

Verdict of guilty upon which judgment of sentence was passed.

*Errors assigned*were to the rejection of several offers of evidence.

*W T.*Tredway, with him *W. J.*Brennan, for appellant.

No appearance nor paper-book for appellee.

November 21, 1905 :

Opinion by

Beaver, J.,

The defendant and John P. Graham were jointly indicted for that they “ did falsely and maliciously conspire and agree together to cheat and defraud one John H. Fisher of his moneys, goods, chattels and other property, and other dishonest, malicious and unlawful acts then and there to do, to the prejudice of him, the said John H. Fisher,” etc. They were tried June 20, 1905, and severally convicted.

After a motion for a new trial, which was duly argued and overruled, the appellant took his appeal to this court, assigning for error the sustaining by the court below of the objections of the prosecution to certain offers of evidence made by the defendant.

*446The testimony is not printed. Even what is printed in the appendix as exhibits has no marks of identification and are not shown in any way to have been offered in evidence. There is no certificate either of the clerk of the court nor of the trial judge that they were so offered. The bill of exceptions, granted four months after the trial, is “ Certified only because counsel for the commonwealth have assented thereto, my own recollection after this lapse of time being defective. John M. Kennedy, P. J.”

It is impossible for us, with a record in this condition, to determine whether certain questions which the counsel of the appellant now allege were asked at the trial were in fact properly asked as cross-examination. There is nothing before us of record by which to try either their competency or relevancy. It is true that, if the facts stated in the history of the case and in the argument of appellant’s counsel were part of the record, we might have something upon which to base an opinion in regard to the subject, but they are not part of the record and, therefore, cannot be considered by us in determining the questions presented.

Inasmuch as all of the assignments of error depend upon practically similar grounds and there is nothing in the record by which we can reach an intelligent conclusion in regard to the competency or relevancy of any of the testimony offered, the assignments must all be overruled.

Judgment affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7414

MARY E. FIELDS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

VIRGINIA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior

District Judge. (CA-04-197)

Submitted: January 13, 2005 Decided: January 19, 2005

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mary E. Fields, Appellant Pro Se. Josephine Frances Whalen, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Mary E. Fields, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the

district court’s order denying relief on her 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(2000) petition for failure to exhaust state remedies and

procedural default. The order is not appealable unless a circuit

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

her constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Fields has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 105 (Wednesday, June 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 30872]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13194]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>12100 and <greek-i>12101]


Massachusetts Disaster Number MA-00025

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 2.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Massachusetts (FEMA-1895-DR), dated 03/
29/2010.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 03/12/2010 through 04/26/2010.
    Effective Date: 05/24/2010.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/28/2010.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 12/29/2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the State of Massachusetts, dated 03/29/2010 is hereby 
amended to extend the deadline for filing applications for physical 
damages as a result of this disaster to 06/28/2010.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-13194 Filed 6-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### In the Matter of Priscilla Drinker.

Motion for reargument denied.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 107 (Friday, June 4, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 31816]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13311]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Diesel After Treatment Accelerated Aging 
Cycles--Heavy-Duty

    Notice is hereby given that, on May 12, 2010, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Southwest Research Institute--
Cooperative Research Group on Diesel After treatment Accelerated Aging 
Cycles--Heavy-Duty (``DAAAC-HD'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, GE Transportation, Erie, PA, has been 
added as a party to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
remains open, and DAAAC-HD intends to file additional written 
notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On February 2, 2009, DAAAC-HD filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on February 26, 2009 (74 FR 8813).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on February 23, 
2010. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on March 24, 2010 (75 FR 14191).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2010-13311 Filed 6-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5228 

To amend section 240(c)(7)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act to 

eliminate the time limit on the filing of a motion to reopen a removal 

proceeding if the basis of the motion is fraud, negligence, misrepresentation, or extortion by, or the attempted, promised, or actual practice 

of law without authorization on the part of, a representative. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 28, 2014 

Mr. VEASEY (for himself, Mr. HINOJOSA, Mr. GUTIE ́RREZ, Mr. VELA, Ms. 

JACKSON LEE, and Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend section 240(c)(7)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act to eliminate the time limit on the filing 

of a motion to reopen a removal proceeding if the basis 

of the motion is fraud, negligence, misrepresentation, 

or extortion by, or the attempted, promised, or actual 

practice of law without authorization on the part of, 

a representative. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5228 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Notario Victim Relief 

3 Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF TIME LIMIT ON MOTIONS TO RE5 OPEN IN CERTAIN CASES. 

6 Section 240(c)(7)(C) of the Immigration and Nation7 ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1229a(c)(7)(C)) is amended by adding 

8 at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(v) FRAUD, NEGLIGENCE, MISREPRE10 SENTATION, OR EXTORTION BY, OR AT11 TEMPTED, PROMISED, OR ACTUAL PRAC12 TICE OF LAW WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION

13 ON THE PART OF, A REPRESENTATIVE.— 

14 There is no time limit on the filing of a 

15 motion to reopen if the basis of the motion 

16 is to apply for relief due to fraud, neg17 ligence, misrepresentation, or extortion by, 

18 or attempted, promised, or actual practice 

19 of law without authorization on the part 

20 of, a representative described in subsection 

21 (a) or (b) of section 1292.1 of title 8, Code 

22 of Federal Regulations, or a person who 

23 claimed to be such a representative, and 

24 the alien establishes such fraud, neg25 ligence, misrepresentation, or extortion by, 

26 or attempted, promised, or actual practice 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5228 IH

1 of law without authorization on the part 

2 of, such a representative (or person) by a 

3 preponderance of evidence.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

81,7('67$7(6%$1.5837&<&2857

1257+(51',675,&72)&$/,)251,$

Case No. 

Chapter

In re

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF 

ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE

, whose business address and telephone number is

'HEWRUV











 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

and who is an active member in good standing of the bar of

having applied in the above-entitled action for admission to practice in the Northern District of

California on a pro hac vice basis, representing

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application is granted, subject to the terms and

conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate appearance pro hac

vice. Service of papers upon and communication with co-counsel designated in the application

will constitute notice to the represented party. All future filings in this action are subject to the

Bankruptcy Local Rules and Electronic Case Filing Procedures adopted by the United States

Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California.



(1'2)25'(5



(300.-"8(3061
$)"35&3&%

%BWJE/-FWJOF	QSPIBDWJDFQFOEJOH


,BUIFSJOF#,PIO	QSPIBDWJDFQFOEJOH


1FOOTZMWBOJB"WF
/84VJUF

8BTIJOHUPO
%$

5FM

'BY

,&--&3#&/7&/655*--1

5PCJBT4,FMMFS	


	ULFMMFS!LFMMFSCFOWFOVUUJDPN


+BOF,JN	


	KLJN!LFMMFSCFOWFOVUUJDPN


$BMJGPSOJB4USFFU
4VJUF

4BO'SBODJTDP
$"

5FM

'BY

4QFDJBM$PVOTFMGPS%FCUPST

PG&E Corporation 

 and 

Pacific Gas and Electric Company, 19-30088

11

Katherine B. Kohn

Groom Law Group, Chartered, 1701 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006 

(202) 861-2607 

the State of Maryland and the District of Columbia

the PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company.

Signed and Filed: July 1, 2019

________________________________________

DENNIS MONTALI

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

Entered on Docket 

July 01, 2019

EDWARD J. EMMONS, CLERK 

U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2814 Filed: 07/01/19 Entered: 07/01/19 17:00:32 Page 1 of

1
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PDF FILE WITH AUDIO FILE ATTACHMENT

Page 1 of 1

2019-30088

PG&E Corporation

Case Type : bk

Case Number : 2019-30088

Audio Date\Time: 6/11/2019 9:31:44 AM

Audio File Size :

Audio Run Time :

6403 KB

[00:26:41] (hh:mm:ss)

Audio File Name : 3bk2019-30088_6112019-93144-AM.mp3

Case Title : PG&E Corporation

Help using this file:

An audio file is embedded as an attachment in this PDF document. To listen to the file,

click the Attachments tab or the Paper Clip icon. Select the Audio File and click Open.

MPEG Layer-3 audio coding technology from Fraunhofer IIS and Thomson.

This digital recording is a copy of a court proceeding and is provided as 

a convenience to the public. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 753 (b) 

"[n]o transcripts of the proceedings of the court shall be considered as 

official except those made from the records certified by the reporter or 

other individual designated to produce the record."