32536 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 109 / Tuesday, June 8, 2010 / Notices 

Environmental Analysis (SEA) in its independent 

investigation) cannot be made before the 

exemption’s effective date. See Exemption of Outof-Service Rail Lines, 5 I.C.C.2d 377 (1989). Any 

request for a stay should be filed as soon as possible 

so that the Board may take appropriate action before 

the exemption’s effective date. 

3Each OFA must be accompanied by the filing 

fee, which is currently set at $1,500. See 49 CFR 

1002.2(f)(25). 

1Foreign Tire Sales, Inc. is an importer of 

replacement motor vehicle equipment, incorporated 

under the laws of the State of New Jersey, with 

offices at 2204 Morris Avenue, Suite L–5, Union, 

New Jersey. 

formal expressions of intent to file an 

OFA under 49 CFR 11152.27(c)(2),3 and 

trail use/rail banking requests under 49 

CFR 1152.29 must be filed by June 18, 

2010. Petitions to reopen or requests for 

public use conditions under 49 CFR 

1152.28 must be filed by June 28, 2010, 

with the Surface Transportation Board, 

395 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 

20423–0001. 

A copy of any petition filed with the 

Board should be sent to EJ&E’s 

representative: Thomas J. Healey, 17641 

S. Ashland Avenue, Homewood, IL 

60430. 

If the verified notice contains false or 

misleading information, the exemption 

is void ab initio. 

EJ&E has filed a combined 

environmental and historic report 

which addresses the effects, if any, of 

the abandonment on the environment 

and historic resources. SEA will issue 

an environmental assessment (EA) by 

June 11, 2010. Interested persons may 

obtain a copy of the EA by writing to 

SEA (Room 1100, Surface 

Transportation Board, Washington, DC 

20423–0001) or by calling SEA, at (202) 

245–0305. [Assistance for the hearing 

impaired is available through the 

Federal Information Relay Service 

(FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339.] Comments 

on environmental and historic 

preservation matters must be filed 

within 15 days after the EA becomes 

available to the public. 

Environmental, historic preservation, 

public use, or trail use/rail banking 

conditions will be imposed, where 

appropriate, in a subsequent decision. 

Pursuant to the provisions of 49 CFR 

1152.29(e)(2), EJ&E shall file a notice of 

consummation with the Board to signify 

that it has exercised the authority 

granted and fully abandoned the line. If 

consummation has not been effected by 

EJ&E’s filing of a notice of 

consummation by June 8, 2011, and 

there are no legal or regulatory barriers 

to consummation, the authority to 

abandon will automatically expire. 

Board decisions and notices are 

available on our Web site at ‘‘http:// 

www.stb.dot.gov.’’ 

Decided: June 2, 2010. 

By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, 

Director, Office of Proceedings. 

Jeffrey Herzig, 

Clearance Clerk. 

[FR Doc. 2010–13761 Filed 6–7–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4915–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Executive Committee of the Aviation 

Rulemaking Advisory Committee; 

Meeting; Correction 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of meeting; correction. 

SUMMARY: On June 3, 2010, the FAA 

published a notice of a meeting of the 

Executive Committee of the Aviation 

Rulemaking Advisory Committee. The 

notice contained an inaccurate date in 

one section. This notice corrects that 

error. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Gerri Robinson, Federal Aviation 

Administration, 800 Independence 

Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591, 

telephone (202) 267–9678; fax (202) 

267–5057; e-mail 

Gerri.Robinson@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 

2010–13326, published June 3, 2010, (75 

FR 31509) make the following 

correction: 

On page 31509, in the second column, 

under the heading SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION, revise the date ‘‘December 

9, 2009’’ to read ‘‘June 16, 2010.’’ 

Issued in Washington, DC, on June 3, 2010. 

Pamela A. Hamilton-Powell, 

Executive Director, Aviation Rulemaking 

Advisory Committee. 

[FR Doc. 2010–13762 Filed 6–7–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

National Highway Traffic Safety 

Administration 

[Docket No. NHTSA–2010–0063; Notice 1] 

Foreign Tire Sales, Inc., Receipt of 

Petition for Decision of 

Inconsequential Noncompliance 

Foreign Tire Sales, Inc. (FTS) 1, as 

importer of record for ProMeter brand 

medium truck radial replacement tires 

manufactured by Shandlong Linglong 

Rubber Company Limited has 

determined that certain replacement 

tires manufactured during the period 

between the 15th week of 2008 and 

22nd week of 2009 do not fully comply 

with paragraph S6.5(d) of 49 CFR 

571.119 Federal Motor Vehicle Safety 

Standard (FMVSS) No. 119, New 

Pneumatic Tires for Motor Vehicles 

With a GVWR of More than 4,536 

Kilograms (10,000 pounds) and 

Motorcycles. FTS has filed an 

appropriate report pursuant to 49 CFR 

part 573, Defect and Noncompliance 

Responsibility and Reports. 

Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 

30120(h) (see implementing rule at 49 

CFR part 556), FTS has petitioned for an 

exemption from the notification and 

remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C. 

Chapter 301 on the basis that this 

noncompliance is inconsequential to 

motor vehicle safety. 

This notice of receipt of FTS’s 

petition is published under 49 U.S.C. 

30118 and 30120 and does not represent 

any agency decision or other exercise of 

judgment concerning the merits of the 

petition. 

Affected are approximately 2,659 size 

285/75R–24.5 14 ply (steer and drive) 

and 295/75R–22.5 14 ply (steer and 

drive) ProMeter brand medium truck 

radial tires manufactured during the 

period between the 15th week of 2008 

and 22nd week of 2009 with DOT 

Numbers: 285/75R–24.5— 

OU4CFTS1508–0U4CFT2209 and 

295/75R–22.5—OU34FTS1508– 

0U34FTS2209. FTS stated that it 

believed that 100% of the 2,659 tires 

involved contained the identified noncompliance. 

FTS sold these tires to eleven 

customers who are distributors. Three of 

the eleven distributors have not sold 

any tires to their customers. 

In a supplemental letter dated April 

14, 2010, FTS submitted corrections of 

typographical errors in its petition and 

stated that subsequent to submitting its 

petition it had decided to remedy all of 

the subject tires that it held in its 

possession as well as those that had not 

been sold by its customers (tire 

distributers). FTS also revised its 

estimate of the number of affected tires 

that had been sold and not retrieved for 

remedy as 2000. Therefore, it is only 

those 2000 tires for which FTS is 

requesting exemption because it claims 

that the remaining 659 tires have been 

remedied. 

Paragraph S6.5(d) of 49 CFR 571.119 

(FMVSS 119) requires in pertinent part: 

S6.5 Tire markings. Except as specified in 

this paragraph, each tire shall be marked on 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 109 / Tuesday, June 8, 2010 / Notices 32537 

each sidewall with the information specified 

in paragraphs (a) through (j) of this section. 

The markings shall be placed between the 

maximum section width (exclusive of 

sidewall decorations or curb ribs) and the 

bead on at least one sidewall, unless the 

maximum section width of the tire is located 

in an area which is not more than one-fourth 

of the distance from the bead to the shoulder 

of the tire. If the maximum section width 

falls within that area, the markings shall 

appear between the bead and a point one-half 

the distance from the bead to the shoulder of 

the tire, on at least one sidewall. The 

markings shall be in letters and numerals not 

less than 2 mm (0.078 inch) high and raised 

above or sunk below the tire surface not less 

than 0.4 mm (0.015 inch), except that the 

marking depth shall be not less than 0.25 mm 

(0.010 inch) in the case of motorcycle tires. 

The tire identification and the DOT symbol 

labeling shall comply with part 574 of this 

chapter. Markings may appear on only one 

sidewall and the entire sidewall area may be 

used in the case of motorcycle tires and 

recreational, boat, baggage, and special trailer 

tires * * * 

(d) The maximum load rating and 

corresponding inflation pressure of the tire, 

shown as follows: 

(Mark on tires rated for single and dual 

load): Max load single lllkg (llllb) at 

lllkPa (lllpsi) cold. Max load dual 

lllkg (llllb) at lllkPa (lllpsi) 

cold. 

(Mark on tires rated only for single load): 

Max load lllkg (llllb) at lllkPa 

(lllpsi) cold. 

FTS describes the noncompliance as 

its failure to provide accurate load and 

inflation information as required by 

FMVSS No. 119. The maximum load 

rating and corresponding inflation 

pressure that are erroneously marked on 

the FTS tires and the correct 

information for the non-conforming tires 

are as follows: 

295/75R22.5/14 is marked: 

Max. Load Single 2800 kg (6175 lbs) at 

720 kPa (105 psi) cold. 

Max. Load Dual 2650 kg (5840 lbs) at 

720 kPa (105 psi) cold. 

295/75R22.5/14 should be marked: 

Max. Load Single 2800 kg (6175 lbs) at 

760 kPa (110 psi) cold. 

Max. Load Dual 2575 kg (5675 lbs) at 

760 kPa (110 psi) cold. 

285/75R24.5/14 is marked: 

Max. Load Single 3000 kg (6610 lbs) at 

720 kPa (105 psi) cold. 

Max. Load Dual 2725 kg (6005 lbs) at 

720 kPa (105 psi) cold. 

285/75R24.5/14 should be marked: 

Max. Load Single 2800 kg (6175 lbs) at 

760 kPa (110 psi) cold. 

Max. Load Dual 2575 kg (5675 lbs) at 

760 kPa (110 psi) cold. 

FTS states that the non-compliance of 

their tires was brought to their attention 

on June 9, 2009, ‘‘when new molds were 

ordered and the old molds were 

compared to the new molds.’’ 

FTS also states that it has advised the 

manufacturer to hold any additional 

non-conforming tires and to change the 

inaccurate information before exporting 

them to the United States. 

FTS argues that the inaccurate 

markings on the tires are 

inconsequential because the difference 

between the proper load ranges and 

inflation pressures are minimal. FTS 

bases their conclusion on their testing of 

the subject tires using the inaccurate 

information noted on their tires, and 

FTS asserts that the tires ‘‘greatly exceed 

all FMVSS testing result requirements.’’ 

Specifically, FTS points out that they 

subjected the tested tires to a modified 

FMVSS No. 119 endurance test which 

they state ‘‘is far more demanding than 

the requirements of FMVSS 119.’’ 

FTS submitted with their application 

for exemption from notification and 

recall a copy of the original Chinese and 

English translation of the eight 

endurance test reports. FTS states that 

‘‘These tests performed using the load 

inflation information which appears on 

the subject tires clearly indicates that 

even at the wrong inflation pressure, 

these tires greatly exceed FMVSS 119 

and are safe.’’ FTS additionally states 

that ‘‘the mislabeling of the tires poses 

absolutely no safety issue since even if 

a user of the tires inflates the tire to the 

load inflation pressure contained on the 

side wall of the subject tire, we know 

that the tire greatly exceeds all 

requirements (i.e. the tires ran almost 

three times longer than required by 

FMVSS 119 at loads increased by 10% 

every ten hours (nine times over 130 

hours)).’’ 

Based on the foregoing, FTS requests 

that NHTSA deem this issue as 

‘‘incidental mislabeling’’ and that it has 

no bearing on the safety of the tires, and 

that FTS be exempted from providing 

notification as required by 49 U.S.C. 

30118 and remedy as required by 49 

U.S.C. 30120. 

NHTSA notes that the statutory 

provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 

30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to 

file petitions for a determination of 

inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to 

exempt manufacturers only from the 

duties found in sections 30118 and 

30120, respectively, to notify owners, 

purchasers, and dealers of a defect or 

noncompliance and to remedy the 

defect or noncompliance. 

Interested persons are invited to 

submit written data, views, and 

arguments on this petition. Comments 

must refer to the docket and notice 

number cited at the beginning of this 

notice and be submitted by any of the 

following methods: 

a. By mail addressed to: U.S. 

Department of Transportation, Docket 

Operations, M–30, West Building 

Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, 

DC 20590. 

b. By hand delivery to U.S. 

Department of Transportation, Docket 

Operations, M–30, West Building 

Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, 

DC 20590. The Docket Section is open 

on weekdays from 10 am to 5 pm except 

Federal Holidays. 

c. Electronically: by logging onto the 

Federal Docket Management System 

(FDMS) Web site at http:// 

www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Comments may also be faxed to 1–202– 

493–2251. 

Comments must be written in the 

English language, and be no greater than 

15 pages in length, although there is no 

limit to the length of necessary 

attachments to the comments. If 

comments are submitted in hard copy 

form, please ensure that two copies are 

provided. If you wish to receive 

confirmation that your comments were 

received, please enclose a stamped, selfaddressed postcard with the comments. 

Note that all comments received will be 

posted without change to 

http://www.regulations.gov, including 

any personal information provided. 

Documents submitted to a docket may 

be viewed by anyone at the address and 

times given above. The documents may 

also be viewed on the Internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov by following the 

online instructions for accessing the 

dockets. DOT’s complete Privacy Act 

Statement is available for review in the 

Federal Register published on April 11, 

2000 (65 FR 19477–78). 

The petition, supporting materials, 

and all comments received before the 

close of business on the closing date 

indicated below will be filed and will be 

considered. All comments and 

supporting materials received after the 

closing date will also be filed and will 

be considered to the extent possible. 

When the petition is granted or denied, 

notice of the decision will be published 

in the Federal Register pursuant to the 

authority indicated below. 

Comment closing date: July 8, 2010. 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: 

delegations of authority at CFR 1.50 and 

501.8. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
32538 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 109 / Tuesday, June 8, 2010 / Notices 

Issued on: June 2, 2010. 

Claude H. Harris, 

Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2010–13612 Filed 6–7–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–59–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request 

June 1, 2010. 

The Department of the Treasury will 

submit the following public information 

collection requirement(s) to OMB for 

review and clearance under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 

Public Law 104–13 on or after the date 

of publication of this notice. Copies of 

the submission(s) may be obtained by 

calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance 

Officer listed. Comments regarding this 

information collection should be 

addressed to the OMB reviewer listed 

and to the Treasury Department 

Clearance Officer, Department of the 

Treasury, Room 11000, 1750 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20220. 

DATES: Written comments should be 

received on or before July 8, 2010 to be 

assured of consideration. 

Financial Management Service (FMS) 

OMB Number: 1510–0019. 

Type of Review: Revision of a 

currently approved collection. 

Title: (Electronic Pre-Printed 

Information), Claim Against the United 

States for the Proceeds of a Government 

Check. 

Form: FMS–1133. 

Abstract: The FMS–1133 form is used 

to collect information needed to process 

an individual’s claim for non-receipt of 

proceeds from a government check. 

Once the information is analyzed, a 

determination is made and a 

recommendation to the program agency 

to either settle or deny the claim. 

Respondents: Individuals and 

Households. 

Estimated Total Burden Hours: 11,278 

hours. 

Bureau Clearance Officer: Wesley 

Powe, Financial Management Service, 

3700 East West Highway, Room 135, 

Hyattsville, MD 20782; (202) 874–7662. 

OMB Reviewer: Shagufta Ahmed, 

Office of Management and Budget, New 

Executive Office Building, Room 10235, 

Washington, DC 20503; (202) 395–7873. 

Celina Elphage, 

Treasury PRA Clearance Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2010–13673 Filed 6–7–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830–01–P 

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY 

[Meeting No. 10–03] 

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice 

June 10, 2010. 

The TVA Board of Directors will hold 

a public meeting on June 10, 2010, at 

Lane College, Graves Auditorium, 545 

Lane Avenue, Jackson, Tennessee 

38301, to consider the matters listed 

below. The public may comment on any 

agenda item or subject at a public 

listening session which begins at 8:30 

a.m. CDT. Immediately following the 

end of the public listening session, the 

meeting will be called to order to 

consider the agenda items listed below. 

Please Note: Speakers must pre-register 

online at TVA.gov or sign in before the 

meeting begins at 8:30 a.m. on the day 

of the meeting. The Board will answer 

questions from the news media 

following the Board meeting. 

Status: Open 

Agenda 

Old Business 

Approval of minutes of April 16, 

2010, Board Meeting 

New Business 

1. Chairman’s Remarks 

2. President’s Report 

3. Report of the Finance, Strategy, 

Rates, and Administration Committee 

A. Executive Goals 

B. Pricing of Alcoa power contract 

extension 

4. Report of the Operations, 

Environment, and Safety Committee 

5. Report of the Audit, Governance, 

and Ethics Committee 

A. Board governance update 

6. Report of the Community Relations 

and Energy Efficiency Committee 

A. EnerNOC capacity expansion 

agreement 

B. Northeastern tributary reservoirs 

Land Management Plan 

C. Hornsby Hollow commercial 

recreation easement 

D. Regional Resource Stewardship 

Council charter renewal and 

revision 

For more information: Please call 

TVA Media Relations at (865) 632–6000, 

Knoxville, Tennessee. People who plan 

to attend the meeting and have special 

needs should call (865) 632–6000. 

Anyone who wishes to comment on any 

of the agenda in writing may send their 

comments to: TVA Board of Directors, 

Board Agenda Comments, 400 West 

Summit Hill Drive, Knoxville, 

Tennessee 37902. 

Dated: June 3, 2010. 

Ralph E. Rodgers, 

Acting General Counsel and Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2010–13875 Filed 6–4–10; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 8120–08–P 

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 

AFFAIRS 

[OMB Control No. 2900–0365] 

Agency Information Collection 

(Request for Disinterment) Activities 

Under OMB Review 

AGENCY: National Cemetery 

Administration, Department of Veterans 

Affairs. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: In compliance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 

(44 U.S.C. 3501–3521), this notice 

announces that the National Cemetery 

Administration, Department of Veterans 

Affairs, will submit the collection of 

information abstracted below to the 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for review and comment. The 

PRA submission describes the nature of 

the information collection and its 

expected cost and burden; it includes 

the actual data collection instrument. 

DATES: Comments must be submitted on 

or before July 8, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Submit written comments 

on the collection of information through 

http://www.Regulations.gov; or to VA’s 

OMB Desk Officer, OMB Human 

Resources and Housing Branch, New 

Executive Office Building, Room 10235, 

Washington, DC 20503 (202) 395–7316. 

Please refer to ‘‘OMB Control No. 2900– 

0365’’ in any correspondence. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Denise McLamb, Enterprise Records 

Service (005R1B), Department of 

Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, 

NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461– 

7485, FAX (202) 273–0443 or e-mail 

denise.mclamb@va.gov. Please refer to 

‘‘OMB Control No. 2900–0365.’’ 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Title: Request for Disinterment, VA 

Form 40–4970. 

OMB Control Number: 2900–0365. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Abstract: Claimants complete VA 

Form 40–4970 to request removal of 

remains from a national cemetery for 

interment at another location. 

Interments made in national cemeteries 

are permanent and final. All immediate 

family members of the decedent, 

including the person who initiated the 

interment, (whether or not he/she is a 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES