alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 506 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to strengthen enforcement of spousal 

court-ordered property distributions, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2013 

Mr. COHEN (for himself, Mr. POE of Texas, Mr. COSTA, Ms. BORDALLO, and 

Mr. DEUTCH) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to strengthen enforcement of spousal court-ordered property distributions, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Jane’s Law’’. 

5 SEC. 2. SPOUSAL OBLIGATIONS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 11A of title 18, United 

7 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol8 lowing: 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 506 IH

1 ‘‘§ 228A. Failure to pay legal spousal court-ordered 

2 property distribution 

3 ‘‘(a) OFFENSE.—Whoever knowingly, travels in inter4 state or foreign commerce, with the intent to evade compli5 ance with a court ordered property distribution as part 

6 of a separation or divorce settlement involving more than 

7 $5,000, with respect to a spouse or former spouse, shall 

8 be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than 

9 two years or both. 

10 ‘‘(b) MANDATORY RESTITUTION.—Upon a conviction 

11 under this section, the court shall order restitution under 

12 section 3663A in an amount equal to the total unpaid 

13 property distribution. 

14 ‘‘(c) DEFINITION.—The term ‘court ordered property 

15 distribution’ means any amount determined under a court 

16 order pursuant to the law of a State or of an Indian tribe 

17 to be due from a spouse or former spouse as an equitable 

18 or other distribution to a spouse or former spouse of assets 

19 in connection with a separation or divorce.’’. 

20 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.— 

21 (1) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of sections 

22 at the beginning of chapter 11A of title 18, United 

23 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 

24 following new item: 

‘‘228A. Failure to pay legal spousal obligations.’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 506 IH

1 (2) TABLE OF CHAPTERS.—The item in the 

2 table of chapters for part I of title 18, United States 

3 Code, relating to chapter 11A is amended to read as 

4 follows: 

‘‘11A. Child support and spousal obligations .......................... 228’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT B7 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1744-8 Filed: 04/29/19 Entered: 04/29/19 13:43:30 Page 1

of 3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1744-8 Filed: 04/29/19 Entered: 04/29/19 13:43:30 Page 2

of 3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1744-8 Filed: 04/29/19 Entered: 04/29/19 13:43:30 Page 3

of 3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3683-3 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 18:06:52 Page 1

of 1
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 106 (Thursday, June 3, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 31419]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13465]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of briefing and meeting.

DATE AND TIME: Friday, June 11, 2010; 9:30 a.m. EDT.

PLACE: 624 9th St., NW., Room 540, Washington, DC 20425.

Briefing Agenda

    The briefing is open to the public.

Topic: Age Discrimination in Employment in the Current Economic Crisis
I. Introductory Remarks by Chairman
II. Speakers' Presentations
III. Questions by Commissioners and Staff Director
IV. Adjourn Briefing

Meeting Agenda

    This meeting is open to the public.

I. Approval of Agenda
II. Program Planning
    <bullet> Approval of Recommendations <greek-i>2 and <greek-i>3--
Educational Effectiveness of Historically Black Colleges & Universities 
Briefing Report
    <bullet> Approval of the Briefing Report--Encouraging Minority 
Students to Pursue Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) 
Careers
    <bullet> Approval of 2011 Business Meeting Calendar
    <bullet> NBPP Enforcement Project--Some of the discussion of this 
agenda item may be held in closed session.
    <bullet> Title IX Project--Some of the discussion of this agenda 
item may be held in closed session.
    <bullet> Discussion of Concept Paper on Attack against Asian-
American Students at South Philadelphia High School
III. Staff Director's Report
IV. Adjourn

CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, 
Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8591. TDD: (202) 376-8116.
    Persons with a disability requiring special services, such as an 
interpreter for the hearing impaired, should contact Pamela Dunston at 
least seven days prior to the meeting at (202) 376-8105. TDD: (202) 
376-8116.

    Dated: June 1, 2010.
David Blackwood,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010-13465 Filed 6-1-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
-- Converted by SEC Publisher, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing





EXHIBIT 10.1


June 26, 2009


SmithKline Beecham plc 

980 Great West Road 

Middlesex, TW8 9GS 

Brentford England 

Attention: General Counsel



SB Holdings Capital Inc.

One Franklin Plaza 

Philadelphia, PA 19102 

Attention: Secretary 

	
Re:   	
Stockholders Agreement, dated as of August 16, 1999, between Quest Diagnostics        
	    	
Incorporated and SmithKlineBeecham plc, as amended    





Dear Sir:


     Reference is made to the above-referenced Stockholders’ Agreement (the “Stockholders’ Agreement”) and capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings ascribed to them in the Stockholders’
Agreement. This letter is a written confirmation that you and we have agreed that it is in the best interests of Quest Diagnostics’ shareholders to amend the Stockholders’ Agreement as described herein. Accordingly, Sections 4.01(a) and
(b) of the Stockholders’ Agreement are hereby amended to replace the word “tenth” with the word “eleventh” and to hereby read as follows: 



“Section 4.01 STANDSTILL PERIOD. (a) The “STANDSTILL PERIOD” shall mean the period beginning on the Closing Date and continuing until the earlier of (i) the eleventh anniversary of the Closing Date and (ii) the date
on which the Stockholder and its Affiliates, in the aggregate, beneficially own less than 10% of the outstanding Company Common Stock. 


     (b) In the event the Standstill Period is discontinued pursuant to Section 4.01(a)(ii), the Standstill Period shall be reinstated if, prior to the occurrence of the event described in Section 4.01(a)(i), the Stockholder and its
Affiliates, in the aggregate, beneficially own 10% or more of the outstanding Company Common Stock. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no event shall the Standstill Period continue past the eleventh anniversary of the Closing Date.” 











     The parties hereto agree that the provisions of the Stockholders’ Agreement other than those described above shall remain unchanged. Please confirm your agreement with the terms and conditions
set forth herein by signing and returning to us a copy of this letter. 

	 	Sincerely yours, 
	     
	 	QUEST DIAGNOSTICS INCORPORATED 
	     
	     
	     
	 	
By:   	
          /s/ Robert F. O’Keef  
	 	    	
Name: Robert F. O’Keef   
	 	    	
Title: Vice President and Treasurer   





Agreed and accepted (including for purposes of Section 4.02 of the Stockholders Agreement):

	
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM PLC        
	     
	     
	
By:  	
/s/ Balbir Kelly-Bisla        
	
Print name:   	
Balbir Kelly-Bisla    
	    	   	
for and on behalf of  
	    	   	
Edinburgh Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.      
	    	   	
Corporate Director    
	    	   	
Authorized Signatory  
	     
	
SB HOLDINGS CAPITAL INC.      
	     
	     
	
By:  	
/s/ William J. Mosher 
	
Print name:   	
William J. Mosher     
	    	   	
Authorized Signatory  





2
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 31, 2019.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-19-00835-CV

NII-OTABIL NELSON, Appellant

V.

DOREEN E NELSON, Appellee

On Appeal from the 245th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2006-31097

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an attempted appeal from a judgment signed June 24, 2019. 

Appellant filed a motion for new trial. When appellant has filed a timely postjudgment motion, the notice of appeal must be filed within 90 days after the date 

the judgment is signed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a). Appellant’s notice of appeal 

was filed October 21, 2019, more than fifteen days after the date it was due on 

September 23, 2015. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex.1997). 
2

Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed timely. On November 26, 2019, 

notification was transmitted to the parties of this court’s intention to dismiss the 

appeal for want of jurisdiction unless appellant filed a response demonstrating 

grounds for continuing the appeal on or before December 5, 2019. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.3(a). Appellant filed no response.

The appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Zimmerer, Spain, and Hassan.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ALVIN BANKS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 487 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 18th day of May, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
A96A1092.

#### HOLLOWAY v. THE STATE.

(474 SE2d 249)

Decided July 22, 1996.

*Hal T. Peel,*for appellant.

*Dupont K. Cheney, District Attorney, Charles D. Howard, Assistant District Attorney,*for appellee.

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Defendant was tried before a jury for aggravated assault upon a correctional officer in that he did cut a correctional officer with a razor while the officer was engaged in the performance of his official duties. The evidence adduced at trial reveals that defendant, an inmate at Georgia State Prison in Reidsville, Georgia, slashed a correctional officer’s left abdomen with a razor while correctional officers were attempting to isolate defendant after defendant assaulted this same correctional officer with a cup of urine. The jury found defendant guilty of the crime charged. This appeal followed the denial of defendant’s motion for new trial. *Held:*

Defendant contends the evidence is insufficient to authorize the jury’s verdict because the State did not introduce the razor defendant used to commit the crime charged into evidence at trial. This assertion is without merit.

Although the State did not introduce the razor defendant used during the assault, Georgia State Prison Officer James C. Lee, Jr. testified that he saw defendant cut a fellow correctional officer with “a razor blade [and that he then observed defendant go to] the back of his cell and flush [the razor blade] down the commode.” This evidence is alone sufficient to authorize the jury’s finding that defendant is guilty, beyond a reasonable doubt, of aggravated assault upon a correctional officer as charged in the indictment. *Jackson v. Virginia,*443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560); *Jackson v. State,*182 Ga. App. 885 (357 SE2d 321).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Johnson and Ruffin, JJ, concur.*
Notice Recipients

District/Off: 0971−3 User: dchambers Date Created: 4/26/2019

Case: 19−30088 Form ID: TRANSC Total: 4

Recipients of Notice of Electronic Filing:

aty Marta Villacorta marta.villacorta@usdoj.gov

aty Robert A. Julian rjulian@bakerlaw.com

TOTAL: 2

Recipients submitted to the Claims Agent (Prime Clerk):

aty Richard W. Slack Weil Gotshal and Manges, LLP 767 Fifth Ave. New York, NY 10153−0119

aty Stephen Karotkin Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153

TOTAL: 2

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1663-3 Filed: 04/24/19 Entered: 04/24/19 18:33:44 Page 1

of 1
Exhibit 13.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of 3SBio Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin Sow Peng Teo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: June 27, 2008



|       |  |                          
|------ |  | -------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/    KEVIN SOW PENG
TEO
|Name:  |  | Kevin Sow Peng Teo       
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer  

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.
CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Card USA, Inc.., (the “Company”) on Form
      10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William P. Williams,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      That
      to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





CARD
      ACTIVATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


By
            /s/
                William P. WilliamsWilliam
                P. WilliamsChairman,
                CEO(Sole
                executive officer of the registrant)December
                26, 2007
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the filing of China Crescent Enterprises, Inc.’s (the “Company”) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated:  May 24, 2010
 
 /s/ James Jiang
 Name:  James Jiang, PhD
 Title:  Chief Executive Officer
 
 Dated:  May 24, 2010
 
 /s/ Philip J. Rauch
 Name:  Philip J. Rauch
 Title:  Chief Financial Officer
#### International Ferry Company, Respondent, v. American Fidelity Company, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

All concurred.
CHIEF JUSTICE

 ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

 NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

 DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

 GINA M. BENAVIDES

 GREGORY T. PERKES

 NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

 DORIAN E. RAMIREZ

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361-888-0416 (TEL)

361-888-0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLOOR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 78539

956-318-2405 (TEL)

956-318-2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa

Court of Appeals 

Thirteenth District of Texas 

May 26, 2015

Hon. J. Lynn Watson

Rosenthal & Watson

P. O. Box 201658

Austin, TX 78720

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. Norton A. Colvin Jr.

Colvin, Chaney, Saenz & Rodriguez, LLP

1201 East Van Buren

P.O. Box 2155

Brownsville, TX 78522-2155

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. Mitchell Craig Chaney

Colvin, Chaney, Saenz & Rodriguez, LLP

1201 E. Van Buren

P.O. Box 2155

Brownsville, TX 78520

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. Marc G. Rosenthal

ROSENTHAL & WATSON

P.O. Box 201658

Austin, TX 78720

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. David I. Schoen

2800 Zelda Road, Suite 100-6

Montgomery, AL 36106

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. Kent Geoffrey Rutter

Haynes and Boone, LLP

1221 McKinney Street, Suite 2100

Houston, TX 77010-2007

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13-13-00257-CV

Tr.Ct.No. 2009-CV-0010-A

Style: VIVIANA SOSA, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF 

DESTINY SOSA, A DECEASED CHILD, AND JESSE SOSA v. UNION PACIFIC 

RAILROAD COMPANY AND ERNESTO ORTEGON

Due to a clerical error, please see attached corrected Memorandum Opinion and 

Judgment relative to the above referenced cause.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER:ch

cc: 197th District Court (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Hon. Gilbert Lozano, Willacy County District Clerk (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Hon. J. Rolando Olvera Jr., Presiding Judge, Fifth Administrative Judicial Region

(DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)
#### Moses Tuscano, Respondent, v. The Astoria Cognac and Liquor Rectifying Company, Appellant.

Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, on the ground that the plaintiff failed to establish a cause of action either for goods sold and delivered or upon an account stated.

Jenks, P. J., Hirschberg, Burr, Woodward and Rich, JJ., concurred.
#### Arthur Collins, Respondent, v. Waterbury Company, Appellant.

Motion to resettle order denied, with ten dollars costs.

Present — Jenks, P. J., Hirsehberg, Burr, Thomas and Carr, JJ.
Exhibit32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO and CFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Oxford ResidentialProperties I Limited Partnership (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly periodended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the "Report"), Steven D. Cordes, as the equivalent of the chiefexecutive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalentof the chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership.

 

 

 

 

Thiscertification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
**RB** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19 - 0613 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. RYAN PATRICK MORRIS and TROY NELSON,

Defendant s and Appellants .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is gran ted an extension of time to and including May 2 , 2021 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 29 2021

03/29/2021
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4112 Filed: 10/03/19 Entered: 10/04/19 11:13:20 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4112 Filed: 10/03/19 Entered: 10/04/19 11:13:20 Page 2 of

2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6780 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

YVONNE BORDERS BENNETT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees,

District Judge. (CR-01-10-V; CA-03-52-5)

Submitted: September 16, 2004 Decided: September 22, 2004

Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Yvonne Borders Bennett, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Richard Ascik,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Yvonne Borders Bennett, a federal prisoner, seeks to

appeal the district court’s order denying relief on her motion

filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). The order is not appealable

unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of

appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and

that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are

also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322,

336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v.

Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently

reviewed the record and conclude that Bennett has not made the

requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
32(i)
-----

            Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Monroe Bancorp (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark D. Bradford,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.




/s/ Mark D. Bradford
--------------------

Mark D. Bradford
President, Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
August 8, 2005


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed for any other purpose.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 19, 2019.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 19, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A20D0138. SHANNON SUTTON et al. v. LARRY SWANSON .

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

19C100147