alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 34.5.2**

[Letterhead of Grant Thornton LLP] 

Accountants and Business Advisors 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

Board of Directors and Shareholders 

Land America Tax and Flood Services, Inc. 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria (“Management’s Report”), that Land America Tax andFlood Services, Inc. (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the residential and commercial mortgage backed securities forwhich the Company served as third-party property tax payment provider on the underlying collateral (the “Platform”) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(i)-(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i)-(vii),1122(d)(3)(i)-(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i)-(x) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii)-(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company’scompliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Platform based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, includedexamining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Platform and perfuming such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testingselected asset-backed transactions and securities constituting the Platform and evaluating whether the Company performed servicing activities related to those transactions and securities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for theperiod covered by this report. Accordingly, our testing may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed transaction or security constituting the Platform. Further, our examination was not designed to detect materialnoncompliance that may have occurred prior to the period covered by this report that may have affected the company’s servicing activities during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis forour opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. 

In ouropinion, management’s assertion that Land America Tax and Flood Services, Inc. complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP 

San Diego, CA 

February 6, 2008 

12340 El Camino Real 

Suite 220 

San Diego, CA 92130 

T 858.704.8000 

F 858.704.8099 

W www.grantthornton.com

Grant Thornton LLP 

US Member of Grant Thornton International
#### STATE v. JAMES TAYLOR.

(Filed 27 September, 1944.)

Criminal Law § 80—

A capital case will be docketed and dismissed for failure to perfect-appeal, on motion of tbe Attorney-General, after tbe Court bas examined tbe record and finds no error.

MotioN by the State to docket and dismiss appeal.

*Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorney-General Patton for the State.*

Per Curiam.

The defendant James Taylor was tried before his Honor J. Paul Frizzelle and a jury at July Term, 1944, of Wake Superior Court upon a bill of indictment charging him with the murder of one J. L. Taylor. The jury returned verdict of guilty of murder in the first degree, as charged in the bill of indictment. Thereupon judgment was rendered sentencing the defendant to death by asphyxiation, as provided by law. From this judgment defendant gave notice of appeal *480to the Supreme Court. However, no ease on appeal has been docketed in this Court and no ease on appeal has been filed in the office of the clerk of the Superior Court of Wake County. The time agreed upon for perfecting appeal has expired, and the attorney representing the defendant has notified the clerk of the Superior Court of Wake County that he does not intend to pursue the appeal, finding in the record no ground therefor.

The defendant having failed to file proper case on appeal and his attorney having given notice that he had abandoned the appeal, the Attorney-General moves that the case be docketed here and the judgment of the Superior Court affirmed under Rule 17.

Before ruling on this motion, we have carefully examined the record and find therein no error. The motion of the Attorney-General to docket and dismiss the appeal is, therefore, allowed. *S. v. Watson,*208 N. C., 70, 179 S. E., 455.

Appeal dismissed. Judgment Affirmed.
#### Thomas S. P. Miller, Appellant, v. Edwin C. Johnson, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Opinion by

Daniels, J.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3958 Filed: 09/20/19 Entered: 09/20/19 14:36:58 Page 1 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3958 Filed: 09/20/19 Entered: 09/20/19 14:36:58 Page 2 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3958 Filed: 09/20/19 Entered: 09/20/19 14:36:58 Page 3 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3958 Filed: 09/20/19 Entered: 09/20/19 14:36:58 Page 4 of

4
#### In the Matter of the Application of the Attorney General, Respondent, v. The Western New York Life Insurance Company, Appellant.

— Judgment affirmed, no costs of appeal awarded.

Haight, J., not sitting.
**Exhibit 1****5****.****2**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

To the Board of Directors

3SBio Inc.:

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-149816 and No. 333-170926) on Form S-8 of 3SBio Inc. of our report dated April 21, 2009, with respect to the consolidated statement of income and comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows of 3SBio Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2008, which report appears in the December 31, 2010 annual report on Form 20-F of 3SBio Inc.

 

/s/ KPMG

 

KPMG

Hong Kong, China 

 

June 3, 2011

 

----
----

----

**Exhibit      31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

|   | a) | designed                such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material                information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated                subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,                particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is                being                prepared; |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | b) | evaluated                the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures                as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report (the                "Evaluation Date"); and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | c) | presented                in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness                of the                disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of                the                Evaluation Date; |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | a) | all                significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls                which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,                process,                summarize and report financial data and have identified for the                registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls;                and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | b) | any                fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other                employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal                controls; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                C. R. Cloutier      |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Chief                Executive Officer |

----

----
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATIONS
      OF THE CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**




**CERTIFICATIONS**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Nutrition 21, Inc., a New York
      corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008,
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Gerard
      Butler, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant
      to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his
      knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/    
                Gerard ButlerGerard
                Butler
              Co-Chief
                Executive Officer


May
      12,
      2008




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Nutrition 21, Inc. and will be retained by Nutrition 21, Inc. and furnished
      to
      the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 12
 CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC.
CALCULATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 Year EndedDecember 31,2005
    
    2006
    
    2007
    
    2008
    
    2009Computation of Earnings:Pretax income (loss) from continuing operations before
equity income (loss)
    
    $
    (16,227
    )
    
    $
    15,172
    
    
    $
    203,344
    
    
    $
    (24,897
    )
    
    $
    146,508Add:Fixed charges
    
    
    125,121
    
    
    
    156,991
    
    
    
    208,723
    
    
    
    182,185
    
    
    
    173,739Amortization of capitalized interest
    
    
    470
    
    
    
    472
    
    
    
    474
    
    
    
    489
    
    
    
    496Distributed income (loss) of equity investees
    
    
    227
    
    
    
    (1,646
    )
    
    
    (2,462
    )
    
    
    (2,373
    )
    
    
    (907
    )Pretax losses of equity investees for which charges
arising from guarantees are included in fixed charges
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Less:Capitalized interest
    
    
    (74
    )
    
    
    (86
    )
    
    
    (618
    )
    
    
    (270
    )
    
    
    Preference security dividend requirements of cons subs
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    TOTAL EARNINGS
    
    $
    109,517
    
    
    $
    170,903
    
    
    $
    409,461
    
    
    $
    155,134
    
    
    $
    319,836Computation of Fixed Charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    81,342
    
    
    $
    105,986
    
    
    $
    140,869
    
    
    $
    111,362
    
    
    $
    97,730Capitalized interest
    
    
    74
    
    
    
    86
    
    
    
    618
    
    
    
    270
    
    
    
    Amortization of debt issue costs
    
    
    2,740
    
    
    
    3,342
    
    
    
    4,727
    
    
    
    4,696
    
    
    
    4,775Interest factor on rent expense
    
    
    40,965
    
    
    
    47,577
    
    
    
    62,509
    
    
    
    65,857
    
    
    
    71,234TOTAL FIXED CHARGES
    
    $
    125,121
    
    
    $
    156,991
    
    
    $
    208,723
    
    
    $
    182,185
    
    
    $
    173,739RATIO OF EARNINGS
TO FIXED CHARGES(1)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1.09
    x
    
    
    1.96
    x
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1.84
    x
 
 (1)
    
    For the purposes of calculating the ratio of earnings to fixed charges,
earnings consist of income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes plus fixed charges
excluding capitalized interest. Fixed charges consist of interest expense, capitalized
interest, amortization of debt issue cost and that portion of rental expense which we believe
to be representative of the interest factor. For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2008,
earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges by $15.6 million and $27.1 million,
respectively.
EXHIBIT B

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3177-2 Filed: 07/24/19 Entered: 07/24/19 16:50:47 Page 1

of 2
Work Section:

Treatment Area: 

Pacific Gas and 

Electric Company

APN#

Date 

GAS TRANSMISSION VEGETATION WORK AUTHORIZATION FORM

Pacific Gas and Electric's representatives have completed a field survey of the vegetation on your property for safety and 

reliability of the gas pipeline. It has been determined that the following vegetation is incompatible and impairing PG&E's 

ability to perform inspections, leak surveys, patrols and maintenance of this gas pipeline and must be removed. There will 

be no cost incurred by you for work performed by PG&E and their contractors. In connection with your agreement with 

PG&E's foregoing work, you agree to do the following: A) Provide (unrestricted or pre-approved or agreed upon) access 

to your property to PG&E and/or their representatives, contractors and sub-contractors during normal business hours. 

B) Keep clear of the work area and keep any children and/or pets away from the work area so as not to pose any safety

risks or hazards while work is taking place.

PG&E hereby covenants and agrees to indemnify ________ against any loss and damage which shall be caused by any

wrongful or negligent act or omission of PG&E or of its agents or employees in the course of their employment, provided,

however, that this indemnity shall not extend to that portion of such loss or damage that shall have been caused by

___________ comparative negligence or willful misconduct.

Land Agent : Inspection Company:

Phone Number: Communication:

LAN ID: Mitigation Amount: 

This agreement is subject to approval by PG&E and shall be binding only if so approved. There are no other implied agreements.

Gas Transmission Vegetation Work Authorization Form-07 /1/2016

VEGETATION WORK 

SPECIES - PT ID DBH WORK TYPE QUANTITY CUSTOMER INITIALS

*Trees/Brush will be cut as low to the ground as safely possible, and all wood and brush will be

chipped and hauled off site.

CUSTOMER INITIALS

Comments: 

OWNER AND PROPERTY INFORMATION

Print Name: SIGNATURE: 

Property Address: Date:

Street: Phone Number: 

City, County: Phone Number (alternative): 

APN: Email:

Pipeline Name: Access Comments: 

Owners Address (if different from above):

Approved EPA Herbicide Application: As needed

CUSTOMER INITIALS

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3177-2 Filed: 07/24/19 Entered: 07/24/19 16:50:47 Page 2

of 2
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 11

                   COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          Three Months Ended   
                                                             December 31       
                                                             -----------       
                                                       1997                1996
                                                       ----                ----
<S>                                                <C>                 <C>   
Net loss                                           $(2,998,750)        $(1,392,000)
Deemed Preferred Stock Dividend relating                                   221,000
 to in-the-money conversion terms
Accretion on Preferred Stock                            35,000             139,000
                                                   -----------         ----------- 
Net loss applicable to common stockholders         $(3,033,750)        $(1,752,000)
                                                   ===========         =========== 
Weighted average number of common shares            29,481,871          16,527,588
 outstanding
Net loss per share                                 $(     0.10)        $(     0.11)
                                                   ===========         =========== 
</TABLE>

                                       1
----

|    |                                                                                                                                                                       |
|---------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| ● | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,      and |
|    |                                                                                                                                                                       |
| ● | the      information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of the    Company.                    |

|   |   |                            |   |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------|--------|
|   | By:    | /s/      KURT H. JENSEN         |   |
|   |   | Kurt      H. Jensen             |   |
|   |   | Chief      Financial Officer    |   |
|   |   | Applied      DNA Sciences, Inc. |   |
|   |   | August      14, 2009            |   |
#### Jeannette Demuth, Appellant, v. George Kemp, Respondent. New York Insurance and Trust Company, as Trustee, and Others, as Trustees, Respondents.

(Appeal No. 1.)

Motions denied, without costs.

Present Jenks, P. J., Hirschberg, Burr, Thomas and Carr, JJ.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 189 Filed: 01/31/19 Entered: 01/31/19 14:55:31 Page 1 of 2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 189 Filed: 01/31/19 Entered: 01/31/19 14:55:31 Page 2 of 2
#### UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Ray HOLMES, Appellant, v. David N. MYERS, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Graterford, Pennsylvania.

No. 15279.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Submitted June 10, 1965.

Decided June 25, 1965.

Gordon Gelfond, Asst. Dist. Atty., James C. Crumlish, Jr., Dist. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., (Joseph M. Smith, Asst. Dist. Atty., Chief, Appeals Division, F. Emmett Fitzpatrick, Jr., First Asst. Dist. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before KALODNER, HASTIE and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On review of the record we find no error. The Order of the District Court will be affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6944

PIERRE A. RENOIR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GEORGE MCMILLAN,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CA-99-356-7)

Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 8, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Pierre A. Renoir, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on

June 28, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was

entered on the docket sheet on June 30, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58

and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date

that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the

effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v.

Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Pierre Renoir appeals the district court’s order dismissing

without prejudice his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted

pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (West Supp. 1999), and

denying his motion for appointment of counsel, request for evidentiary hearing, and petition for subpoena. We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. See Renoir v. McMillan, No. CA-99-356-7 (W.D. Va.

June 30, 1999).* We further deny Renoir’s “motion for court order

for copies.” We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PennantPark Investment Corporation (the “Company”) for the annual period ended September 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Aviv Efrat, as Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Registrant hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





/S/    AVIV EFRATName:Aviv EfratTitle:Chief Financial Officer and TreasurerDate:November 16, 2011