alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of NetTalk.com, Inc., a Florida corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the fiscal ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Guillermo Rodriguez, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Guillermo RodriguezGuillermo RodriguezChief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)Date:  December 15, 2010
#### Edward Lewis, as Receiver, Appellant, v. The St. Vincent Male Orphan Asylum of Utica and William Kernan, Respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with one bill of costs in favor of defendant Kernan. Opinion by

Vann, J.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, June 3, 2010 at 2 p.m.

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), (8), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.

Commissioner Paredes, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session.

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, June 3, 2010 will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;

A regulatory matter regarding a financial institution; and

Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:

The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: May 27, 2010.

Florence E. Harmon, 

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-13329 Filed 5-28-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BAKER 

&

HOSTETLER LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

LOS ANGELES

EXHIBIT A

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3626-1 Filed: 08/20/19 Entered: 08/20/19 19:48:11 Page 1

of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BAKER 

&

HOSTETLER LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

LOS ANGELES

Robert A. Julian (SBN 884469)

Cecily A. Dumas (SBN 111449)

BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP

1160 Battery Street, Suite 100

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: 628.208.6434

Facsimile: 310.820.8859

Email: rjulian@bakerlaw.com

Email: cdumas@bakerlaw.com

Eric E. Sagerman (SBN 155496)

Lauren T. Attard (SBN 320898)

BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP

11601 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1400

Los Angeles, CA 90025

Telephone: 310.820.8800

Facsimile: 310.820.8859

Email: esagerman@bakerlaw.com

Email: lattard@bakerlaw.com

Counsel for Official Committee of Tort Claimants

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION

-andPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY,

Debtors

Bankruptcy Case 

No. 19-30088 (DM)

Chapter 11

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

□ Affects PG& E Corporation

□ Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company

■ Affects both Debtors

*All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case, 

No. 19-30088 (DM)

ORDER AUTHORIZING THE FILING 

UNDER SEAL OF A REPLY IN 

SUPPORT OF MOTION OF THE 

OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF TORT 

CLAIMANTS TO COMPEL 

PRODUCTION OF THIRD-PARTY 

CONTRACTOR DOCUMENTS 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3626-1 Filed: 08/20/19 Entered: 08/20/19 19:48:11 Page 2

of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BAKER 

&

HOSTETLER LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

LOS ANGELES

- 2 -

The Court, having considered the Motion of the Official Committee of Tort Claimants for 

Entry of an Order Authorizing the Filing Under Seal of a Reply in Support of Motion to Compel 

Production of Third-Party Contractor Documents (the “Sealing Motion”), for entry of an order 

authorizing the TCC to file under seal a Reply in Support of Motion to Compel Production of ThirdParty Contractor Document, and after due deliberation and sufficient cause appearing therefor:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Sealing Motion is granted.

2. This Court shall retain jurisdiction to hear and determine all matters arising from or 

related to the implementation, interpretation, or enforcement of this Order.

** END OF ORDER **

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3626-1 Filed: 08/20/19 Entered: 08/20/19 19:48:11 Page 3

of 3
#### CHARLES W. FALLS v. MONARCH COTTON MILLS COMPANY.

(Filed 22 January, 1930.)

Master and Servant O e — Evidence that injury was caused by act of fellow-servant held sufficient to he submitted to jury and sustain their verdict in defendant’s favor.

Where in an action by an employee to recover damages for a negligent injury the evidence is conflicting as to whether the explosion of the barrel resulting in the injury in suit was caused by the negligent act of a foreman or a fellow-servant, the submission of the question to the jury is proper, and judgment upon their answer to the issue of the defendant’s negligence in the negative will be sustained.

Civil actioN, before *Ccnuper, Special Judge,*at May Special Term, 1929, of Gaston.

Plaintiff offered evidence tending to show that the defendant in the course of its business used a large iron pot for heating water to be used in scrubbing floors in its mill. This pot had a screen about it to prevent the escape of fire. The plaintiff was an ordinary laborer and a part of his duties consisted in scrubbing floors. The screen about the pot was made from “old steel drums” or barrels. These barrels were cut open and placed around-the pot. There was a barrel in front to protect the legs of the workmen from being burned while dipping water from the pot. On the evening before plaintiff was injured the old screen had been taken away, and the plaintiff was directed to fix a, new screen. He testified: “I split the drums open, hammered them out, and stood them around the fire.” After doing this the plaintiff left and his brother Tom Falls placed another barrel or drum at the front opening in the background or screen. Tom Falls testified that Caldwell told him to place the barrel at that point. Caldwell, who was a witness for plaintiff, *228denied tbat be was a boss or a foreman, or tbat be told Tom Falls to place tbe barrel in front of tbe screen. Early next morning about 4:30 a.m., plaintiff made a fire wbicb bad burned down, and be was building another around tbe pot when tbe barrel exploded, and as a result thereof, plaintiff suffered serious and permanent injury.

Issues of negligence, contributory negligence, and damages were submitted to tbe jury, and tbe jury answered tbe issue of negligence in tbe negative.

From judgment upon tbe verdict tbe plaintiff appealed.

*8. D. Dolley and A. O. J ones for plaintiff.*

*George B. Mason for defendant.*

BROGDEN, *J.*

The plaintiff offered evidence tending to show that tbe barrel wbicb caused tbe injury, was negligently placed near tbe fire by order of a foreman or *boss*of defendant, and tbat this barrel was unsafe — thus rendering tbe place of work unsafe and dangerous. There was evidence tbat tbe barrel was voluntarily selected and set in position by fellow-servants of plaintiff.

Tbe defendant offered no evidence.

Both views were submitted to tbe jury, and tbe issue of negligence was answered in tbe negative. There is no new or novel proposition of law presented, and a careful examination of tbe record and briefs discloses no reversible error.

No error.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.

  Banc of America Funding Corporation
  Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,
  Series 2007-1

  I, Kelly Rentz, a Vice President of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (the "Master
  Servicer"), certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of the Banc of America Funding 2007-1 Trust (the "Exchange
    Act Periodic Reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports;

  4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
    servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
    conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
    this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
    in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the servicers have fulfilled
    their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material
    respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with the servicing
    criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
    reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
    asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
    accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
    13a-18 and 15d- 18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
    except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of
    noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this
    report on Form 10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Bank
    of America, National Association as Servicer and National City Mortgage
    Co. as Servicer.

    Dated:   March 27, 2008


    /s/ Kelly Rentz
    Signature

    Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master
    servicer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          28,774
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             765
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                11,200
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    111,876
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          10,300
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            10,427
<LOANS>                                        635,857
<ALLOWANCE>                                      9,552
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 817,293
<DEPOSITS>                                     630,005
<SHORT-TERM>                                    55,165
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              7,531
<LONG-TERM>                                     49,176
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,821
<OTHER-SE>                                      69,595
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 817,293
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 40,724
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,587
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   664
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                46,975
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              17,092
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,485
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           24,490
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    2,237
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  36
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 17,288
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,223
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      10,223
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,742
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.14
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.30
<LOANS-NON>                                        812
<LOANS-PAST>                                       179
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   446
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,754
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 8,335
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    2,039
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,019
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                9,552
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             6,666
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          2,886
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (Item 1123)

Residential Funding Company, LLC

RALI Series 2007-QA1 Trust (the Issuing Entity)

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Residential Funding Company, LLC, as servicer (the Servicer) pursuant to the Series Supplement, dated as of January 1, 2007, and the Standard Terms of Pooling and Servicing
Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2006 (as amended from time to time, the Agreement), among Residential Accredit Loans, Inc., as company, Residential Funding Company, LLC, as master servicer, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company
Americas, as trustee, does hereby certify that:

1. A review of the Servicers activities during the period covered by the Issuing Entitys
report on Form 10-K and of the Servicers performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based
on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 24th day of March 2008.



|       |  |                     
|------ |  | --------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
|Name:  |  | Anthony N. Renzi    
|Title: |  | Managing Director
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Ronald H. Friesen, principal financial officer of Sun Life Assurance Company of
Canada (U.S.) (the "Company"), hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Ronald H.
      FriesenRonald
      H. FriesenSenior
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(principal
      financial officer)May
      14, 2009
Exhibit 32.1    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of TransAct Energy Corp. a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-K for the annual period ending December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Roderick c. Bartlett, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    /s/ Roderick C. Bartlett Roderick C. Bartlett Chief Executive Officer Date: February 23, 2015
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Jack Grynberg d/b/a Grynberg Petroleum Company v.

Teledrift Company d/b/a Spidle Turbeco

Appellate case number: 01

- 13

- 00512

- CV

Trial court case number: 2011

- 16376

Trial court: 80th District Court of Harris County

The trial court clerk filed the clerk’s record for this appeal on July 9, 2013. The

court reporter filed the reporter’s record on February 18, 2014. Accordingly, we order

appellant to file appellant’s brief with in 6 0 days of the date of this order. See T EX

. R.

A PP . P. 38.6(a). Appellee’s brief, if any, will be due within 30 days after the date

appellant’s brief is filed. See T EX

. R. A PP . P. 38.6(b).

Further, we carry the issue of whether this Court has jurisdiction over this appeal

with the case and or der the parties to address the issue in their briefs.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Sherry Radack

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: February 2 7 , 2014
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In
connection with the annual report of White Dental Supply, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Nancy White,
acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I,
Mike White, acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Nancy
White


Nancy
White


Chief
Executive Officer


March
30, 2009





/s/ Mike
White


Mike
White


Chief
Financial Officer


March
30, 2009
#### L. A. MUSE v. W. F. MORRISON, POWELL DEWEESE, AB ROBINSON, CARY SMATHERS, W. L. SNYDER and LLOYD SELLERS.

(Filed 29 September, 1954.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *Sharp, S. J.,*March Term 1954, BtjNcombe.

This case was first beard in the Superior Court at the March Civil Term 1951, of Buncombe, on demurrer to the complaint. The demurrer was sustained. Upon appeal the judgment was reversed. *Muse v. Morrison,*234 N.C. 195, 66 S.E. 2d 783.

The complaint alleges the defendant Morrison, who was Secretary of the State Board of Examiners of Plumbing and Heating Contractors, the defendant Smathers, who was the Town Clerk of Canton, and the other defendants, who were members of the Board of Aldermen of the Town of Canton, conspired to drive the plaintiff out of business as a journeyman plumber. It alleged that the means used to accomplish this purpose were: (1) The defendant Morrison and the members of the Board of Examiners of Plumbing and Heating Contractors (the latter not parties) wrongfully refused to issue the plaintiff a license; (2) the defendants procured the passage of an ordinance for the Town of Canton requiring that all persons doing plumbing and heating contracting in the town first obtain a State license; (3) the defendants initiated criminal prosecutions against the plaintiff, charging him with engaging in business without license; that in the prosecutions false affidavits were made and the processes of the courts corruptly used to embarrass the defendant and make it impossible for him to carry on his business.

The defendants answered, denying all charges of wrongdoing, and pleading the lapse of time and the three-year statute of limitations in bar of plaintiff’s right to recovery.

Upon the hearing on the merits at the March Term 1954, Superior Court of Buncombe County, the defendants made a motion for judgment of nonsuit at the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence. Judgment of nonsuit was entered, from which the plaintiff brings this appeal.

*Cecil C. Jackson and W. W. Candler for plaintiff, appellant.*

*Shelley B. Caveness, Tom A. Clark, and Ward <& Bennett for defendants, appellees.*

Peu OuRiAM.

We have examined each of the 90 assignments of error and find them without substantial merit. The evidence taken in the light most favorable to the plaintiff fails to sustain the allegations of the complaint. The judgment of nonsuit at the close of plaintiff’s evidence was required by reason of a failure of proof.

*665The judgment is

Affirmed.