alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### W. D. COLWELL et ux. v. MARTIN O’BRIEN et ux.

(Filed 22 January, 1930.)

Specific performance B a — Tenancy by the curtesy initiate is sufficient interest in land to support specific performance against husband.

Where in a contract by a husband and wife to convey lands of the wife the wife’s privy examination is not taken, the interest of the husband as tenant by the curtesy *initiate*is sufficient to support an action for specific performance against him so far as his interest is concerned.

Petition by defendants to rehear this case, reported in 196 N. C., 508, 146 S. E., 142.

*Bellamy & Bellamy, John A. Stevens a,nd I. 0. Wright for plaintiffs.*

*Bryan & Campbell for defendants.*

*229Stacy, 0. J.

Has a tenant by tbe curtesy *initiate*sufficient interest in land to support an action for specific performance, so far as bis interest is concerned, under a contract of sale signed by said tenant and bis wife, where tbe wife’s privy examination is not taken? ¥e tbink so.

While it is true that a, husband as tenant by tbe curtesy *initiate,*under our present Constitution and laws, has no present estate in bis wife’s land which be may sell or lease, without bis wife’s joinder, or which may be taken under execution against him *(Cecil v. Smith,*81 N. C., 285), nevertheless, after birth of issue alive, curtesy *initiate*is still regarded with us as a valuable interest which may ripen into an estate of freehold, or curtesy *consummate*as at common law. *Jackson v. Beard,*162 N. C., 105, 78 S. E., 6; *Jones v. Coffey,*109 N. C., 515, 14 S. E., 84; *Walker v. Long,*109 N. C., 510, 14 S. E., 299. Indeed, in *Thompson v. Wiggins,*109 N. C., 508, 14 S. E., 301, it was said that “He has, by the curtesy *initiate,*a freehold interest, but not an estate, in the property.”

But without regard to the precise interest which a tenant by the curtesy *initiate*may have, the question presently presented is whether the contract of sale, set out in 196 N. C., 508, is valid and capable of being specifically enforced so far as the interest of the male defendant is concerned. We see no valid reason for disturbing the original opinion heretofore filed in the case.

Petition dismissed.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4140 Filed: 10/04/19 Entered: 10/04/19 15:19:21 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4140 Filed: 10/04/19 Entered: 10/04/19 15:19:21 Page 2 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4143 Filed: 10/04/19 Entered: 10/04/19 15:29:46 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4143 Filed: 10/04/19 Entered: 10/04/19 15:29:46 Page 2 of

2
#### Georgianna F. Webster, Respondent, v. Mary J. Clark, as Executrix, etc., Appellant.

Emal judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Follett, J.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4128 Filed: 10/03/19 Entered: 10/04/19 12:29:48 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4128 Filed: 10/03/19 Entered: 10/04/19 12:29:48 Page 2 of

2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

.

Heinz Binder (SBN 87908)

Robert G. Harris (SBN 124678)

BINDER & MALTER, LLP

2775 Park Avenue

Santa Clara, CA 95050

Tel: (408) 295-1700

Fax: (408) 295-1531

Email: Heinz@bindermalter.com

Email: Rob@bindermalter.com

Attorneys for TURN, The Utility Reform Network

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re

PG&E CORPORATION

and

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY,

 Debtors.

Case Nos. 19-30088 DM (Lead Case)

 19-30089 DM

Chapter 11

Jointly Administered 

☐ Affects PG&E Corporation

☐ Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company

☒ Affects both Debtors

* All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case 

No. 19-30088 DM.

NOTICE OF TRANSFER OF CLAIM OTHER THAN FOR SECURITY

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3541 Filed: 08/14/19 Entered: 08/14/19 08:57:27 Page 1 of

2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOTICE OF TRANSFER OF CLAIM OTHER THAN FOR SECURITY 1 .

A CLAIM HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS CASE or deemed filed under 11 U.S.C. § 1111(a). 

Transferee hereby gives notices pursuant to Rule 3001(e)(2), Fed. R. Bankr. P., of the transfer, 

other than for security, of the claim reference in this notice. 

TURN, The Utility Reform Network

Name of Transferee 

VENDOR RECOVERY FUND IV, LLC

Name of Transferor

Address for all Communications/Notices:

Binder & Malter, LLP

Atten: Robert Harris 

2775 Park Ave. 

Santa Clara, CA 95050

Phone: 408-295-1700

Email: rob@bindermalter.com

Name & Address for all Payments:

SAME AS ABOVE

Amount of Claim: $983.84

Scheduled: 

Proof of Claim No.: 1556

Date Claim Filed: 03/19/19

Address of Transferor: 

Vendor Recovery Fund IV, LLC

PO BOX 669

Smithtown, NY 11787

Last Four Digits of Acct #: _____________ Last Four Digits of Acct #: _____________

I declare under penalty of perjury that the information provided in this notice is true and 

correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. 

Dated: August 14, 2019 By: /s/ Robert G. Harris

 Robert G. Harris

 

Attorneys for The Utility Reform Network (TURN)

Penalty for making a false statement: Fine of up to $500,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years, or both. 18 U.S.C. §§ 152 & 3571.

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3541 Filed: 08/14/19 Entered: 08/14/19 08:57:27 Page 2 of

2
Dated:  March 29, 2007                                                                            In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:By: /s/              E. Todd Whittemore                                                      Title:Executive Vice President, Master ServicingAurora Loan Services LLC,   as Master ServicerI, E. Todd Whittemore, certify that:1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of  Structured Adjustable Rate Mortgage Loan Trust, Series 2006-12 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");2.  Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and5.  All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.E. Todd Whittemore**Exhibit 31 : Sarbanes-Oxley Certification**Assurant Inc., as Sub-Contractor for Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc.Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP, as ServicerDeutsche Bank National Trust Company, as CustodianFirst American Real Estate Solutions of Texas, L.P., as Sub-Contractor for Aurora Loan Services LLCGreenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc., as ServicerLandAmerica Tax and Flood Services, Inc., as Sub-Contractor for Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc.LaSalle Bank National Association, as CustodianNewport Management Corporation, as Sub-Contractor for Aurora Loan Services LLCU.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Paying Agent and CustodianWells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian
Signed and Filed: February 12, 2019

________________________________________

DENNIS MONTALI

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

Entered on Docket 

February 12, 2019

EDWARD J. EMMONS, CLERK 

U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 414 Filed: 02/12/19 Entered: 02/12/19 15:57:15 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-4576

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus BRANDON SCOTT MORTON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (CR-02-871) Submitted: February 12, 2004 Decided: February 20, 2004 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Barlow Loggins, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellant. Isaac Louis Johnson, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Brandon Morton appeals his convi ction pursuant to a guilty plea and 151-month sentence for two counts of bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) (2000). Counsel for Morton has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he states there are no meritorious grounds for appeal, but presenting one issue for this court’s review. Although notified of his right to file a supplemental brief, Morton has not done so. Finding no error, we affirm. Counsel suggests that the district court erred in failing to depart downward from Morton’s sentencing range for his substantial assistance to the Government. However, in the plea agreement, the Government retained discretion over whether to make a substantial assistance motion; it was not obligated to so move. SeeUnited States v. Snow , 234 F.3d 187, 190 (4th Cir. 2000). Moreover, the denial of a request for a downward departure is not reviewable on appeal unless the district court mistakenly believed it lacked the authority to depart. United States v. Bayerle , 898 F.2d 28, 30 (4th Cir. 1990). The record indicates the district court understood its authority to depart, but that it chose not to depart. Therefore, Morton’s claim is unreviewable on appeal. As required by Anders , we have reviewed the entire record and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm Morton’s conviction and sentence. The court requires that- 3 - counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 104 (Tuesday, June 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 30418]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13074]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1909-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2010-0002]


Tennessee; Amendment No. 8 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Tennessee (FEMA-1909-DR), dated May 4, 2010, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: May 18, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Recovery Directorate, 
Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this disaster is closed effective May 18, 2010.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2010-13074 Filed 5-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JESUS RUBEN MOLINA,

Appellant,

v.

ELIAS ALVARADO,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 13

- 00157

- CV

On Appeal from the

112th District Court

of Upton County, Texas

(No . 12

- 07

- U4238

- OTH )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court bel ow. We further order that Appellee

recover from Appellant and his sureties, if any, see T EX .R.A PP .P. 43.5, on the judgment and all

costs, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 23RD DAY OF APRIL, 201 4

.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6092** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. RODERICK BLACK , Defendant

– Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dist rict of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 2:94

- cr - 00015

- BO

- 9 )

Submitted : March 16, 2010 Decided: March 24, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Rode rick Black, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Roderick Black appeals the district court ’ s orde r denying Black ’s motion for sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006)
. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Black , No. 2:94

- cr - 00015

- BO

- 9 (E.D.N.C. filed Dec. 17, 2009; entered
Dec. 18, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRME D
#### Betsey Ketchum v. James A. Holden, Administrator.

Motion for reargument or leave to go to the Court of Appeals denied, with ten dollars costs.
**EXHIBIT21.1**

 

**VanguardNatural Resources, LLC**

**OWNERSHIPLIST**

**asof December 31, 2007**

** **
| ** **                 | ** ** | **Place  of**     | ** ** | ** **                       | ** ** | ** **       | ** ** | **Percentage** | ** ** |
|----------------------------|------------|-------------------|------------|----------------------------------|------------|------------------|------------|----------------|------------|
| **Entity Name**            | ** ** | **Incorporation** | ** ** | **Owner**                        | ** ** | **Relationship** | ** ** | **Ownership**  | ** ** |
|                       |       |              |       |                             |       |             |       |           |       |
| Trust  Energy Company, LLC |       | Kentucky          |       | Vanguard  Natural Gas, LLC       |       | Sole  Member     |       | 100            | %          |
|                       |       |              |       |                             |       |             |       |           |       |
| Ariana  Energy, LLC        |       | Tennessee         |       | Vanguard  Natural Gas, LLC       |       | Sole  Member     |       | 100            | %          |
|                       |       |              |       |                             |       |             |       |           |       |
| Vanguard  Natural Gas, LLC |       | Kentucky          |       | Vanguard  Natural Resources, LLC |       | Sole  Member     |       | 100            | %          |
|                       |       |              |       |                             |       |             |       |           |       |
| VNR  Holdings, LLC         |       | Delaware          |       | Vanguard  Natural Gas, LLC       |       | Sole  member     |       | 100            | %          |
|                       |       |              |       |                             |       |             |       |           |       |
| Vanguard  Permian, LLC     |       | Delaware          |       | Vanguard  Natural Gas, LLC       |       | Sole  Member     |       | 100            | %          |

 

----
**EXHIBIT 35.1****SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**I, Barry E. Pakenham, Treasurer of The Potomac Edison Company (the “Servicer”), certify that:(a) A review of the Servicer’s activities during the reporting period covered by this Report onForm 10-K and of its performance under that certain Transferred Environmental Control PropertyServicing Agreement dated as of April 11, 2007 between PE Environmental Funding LLC and theServicer (the “Servicing Agreement”) has been made under my supervision.(b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period,except that the Servicer maintained environmental control property documentation at a sitedifferent than the site specified in the transaction agreementDate:March 28, 2008     /s/ Barry E. Pakenham Name:       Barry E. Pakenham
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

# ACTION:

                        Notice of cancellation of consideration of a proposed action                               ( print page 31796)                            under Section III-A-1 of the                         *NIH Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant DNA Molecules (NIH Guidelines).*

# SUMMARY:

Notice of a discussion of a proposed action under Section III-A-1 published on May 24, 2010 (75 FR 28811) is withdrawn. The discussion that was to be held at the June 16-17, 2010 meeting of the NIH Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee has been deferred at the request of the principal investigator. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        OBA by e-mail at                         *oba@od.nih.gov,*                         or telephone at 301-496-9838, if you have questions, or require additional information.                     

Dated: May 26, 2010. 

Jacqueline Corrigan-Curay, 

Acting Director, Office of Biotechnology Activities, National Institutes of Health.

[FR Doc. 2010-13484 Filed 6-3-10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                             454
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,390
<ALLOWANCES>                                        56
<INVENTORY>                                      9,032
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,943
<PP&E>                                          15,228
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,121
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,096
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,492
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           16,339
<PREFERRED>                                      4,248
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,206
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,096
<SALES>                                         12,457
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,444
<CGS>                                            9,606
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,782
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   111
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 447
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    662
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                662
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       662
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>