alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             483
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,093
<ALLOWANCES>                                       179
<INVENTORY>                                      4,443
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,253
<PP&E>                                           8,254
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,975
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,929
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,338
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           753
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,119
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,929
<SALES>                                         19,535
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,535
<CGS>                                           14,134
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,134
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 338
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,544)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,544)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,544)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (3.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (3.39)
        


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

Northern District of California

In re:

Debtor(s)

Bankruptcy No.:

R.S. No.:

Hearing Date:

Time:

Relief From Stay Cover Sheet

Instructions: Complete caption and Section A for all motions. Complete Section B for mobile homes, motor vehicles, and personal property.

Complete Section C for real property. Utilize Section C as necessary. If moving party is not a secured creditor, briefly summarize the nature

of the motion in Section D.

(A) Date Petition Filed: Chapter:

Prior hearings on this obligation: Last Day to File §523/§727 Complaints:

(B) Description of personal property collateral (e.g. 1983 Ford Taurus):

Secured Creditor [ ] or lessor [ ]

Fair market value: $________________ Source of value:__________________

Contract Balance: $________________ Pre-Petition Default: $_______________

Monthly Payment: $________________ No. of months: ___________

Insurance Advance: $________________ Post-Petition Default: $_______________

No. of months: ___________

 (C) Description of real property collateral (e.g. Single family residence, Oakland, CA):

Fair market value: $_______________ Source of value:_______________ If appraisal, date:___________

Moving Party's position (first trust deed, second, abstract, etc.):

Approx. Bal. $_______________ Pre-Petition Default: $_______________

As of (date): _______________ No. of months: ____________

Mo. payment: $_______________ Post-Petition Default: $_______________

Notice of Default (date): __________ No. of months: ____________

Notice of Trustee's Sale: __________ Advances Senior Liens: $_______________

Specify name and status of other liens and encumbrances, if known (e.g. trust deeds, tax liens, etc.):

Position Amount Mo. Payment Defaults

1st Trust Deed:_____________________ $_______________ $_______________ $_______________

2nd Trust Deed: ____________________ $_______________ $_______________ $_______________

_________________________________:

_________________________________:

_________________________________:

(Total) $_______________ $_______________ $_______________

(D) Other pertinent information:

______________________________________

Signature

______________________________________

Print or Type Name

Attorney for___________________________________

CANB Documents Northern District of California 

/s/ Matthew D. Metzger Dated: 07/02/2019

Dan Clarke

PG&E Corporation and

Pacific Gas and Electric Company

19-3088 (DM)

BLV-001

07/09/2019

9:30 am

01/29/2019 11

None

1

Movant seeks leave to return to District Court to obtain injunctive relief re ongoing MGP waste contaimination.

Matthew D. Metzger

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2823-14 Filed: 07/02/19 Entered: 07/02/19 12:56:04 Page 1

of 1
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4073 Filed: 10/02/19 Entered: 10/02/19 12:10:42 Page 1 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4073 Filed: 10/02/19 Entered: 10/02/19 12:10:42 Page 2 of

3
On behalf of JULIO A. CASTILLO, Clerk of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals,

the District of Columbia Bar does hereby certify that

Geoffrey Stewart

was duly qualified and admitted on January 10, 1980 as an attorney and counselor entitled to 

practice before this Court; and is, on the date indicated below, an Active member in good 

standing of this Bar.

For questions or concerns, please contact the D.C. Bar Membership Office at 202-626-3475 or email 

memberservices@dcbar.org.

Issued By: 

 District of Columbia Bar Membership

In Testimony Whereof,

I have hereunto subscribed my 

name and affixed the seal of this 

Court at the City of 

Washington, D.C., on 

September 26, 2019.

JULIO A. CASTILLO

Clerk of the Court

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4073 Filed: 10/02/19 Entered: 10/02/19 12:10:42 Page 3 of

3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          31,209
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             430
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                16,700
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    129,857
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           3,877
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             3,929
<LOANS>                                        677,773
<ALLOWANCE>                                     10,338
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 875,851
<DEPOSITS>                                     670,690
<SHORT-TERM>                                    63,277
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              8,360
<LONG-TERM>                                     56,731
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,823
<OTHER-SE>                                      70,970
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 875,851
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 42,131
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                6,569
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   630
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                49,330
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              18,739
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,835
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           26,495
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,461
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 780
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 20,292
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,122
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      13,122
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,626
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.75<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.735<F2>
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.42
<LOANS-NON>                                        476
<LOANS-PAST>                                       700
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   460
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  2,907
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 9,650
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,718
<RECOVERIES>                                       945
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               10,338
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             8,470
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,868
<FN>
<F1>ADJUSTED FOR OCTOBER 15, 1998 100% STOCK SPLIT
<F2>ADJUSTED FOR OCTOBER 15, 1998 100% STOCK SPLIT
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MARSHALL BRONSTEIN, D.C. a/a/o CLAIRE LIBASCI
, Appellant,

v.

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY

, Appellee.

No. 4D 2 1

- 4

[March 31, 2021]

CORRECTED OPINION

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; John Bowman , Judge ; L.T. Case No s

. COCE16

- 000761

and CACE19

- 005463

.

Douglas H. Stein of Douglas H. Stein, P.A., Miami, for appellant.

Daniel E. Nordbly and Alyssa L. Cory of Shutts & Bowen LLP, Tampa, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Appellant, Marshall Bronstein, D.C. (“health care provider”), sued Appellee, Allstate Insurance Co. (“Allstate”), in the county court asserting

a claim for health care services rendered to Allstate’s insured under a personal injury protection (PIP) policy.

The sole issue in the county court proceeding was whether Allstate had properly elected the payment limitations of section 627.736(5)(a)(2)(f), Fla. Stat. (2011), in its PIP policy. That issue was conclusively determined in favor of Allstate on January 26, 2017, when the Florida Supreme Court

issued its decision in Allstate Insurance Co. v. Orthopedic Specialists , 212 So. 3d 973 (Fla. 2017), holding that “Allstate’s PIP policy provides le gally sufficient notice of Allstate’s election to use the permissive Medicare fee schedules identified in section 627.736(5)(a)2. to limit reimbursements.”

212 So. 3d at 974.2 The health care provider waited over two years later, until February 6,

2019

— af ter the case was set for trial, Allstate’s motion for summary judgment was pending, and the case was only eight days from calendar

call

— to move to amend his complaint to attempt to allege an alternative theory of recovery that was not precluded by Orthoped ic Specialists . Under these circumstances, we conclude that it was not an abuse of discretion for the county court to deny the belated ore tenus motion to amend the complaint. See Noble v. Martin Mem’l Hosp. Ass’n, Inc. , 710 So. 2d 567, 569 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (“The trial court properly exercised the discretion given to it in denying [plaintiff’s] motion for leave to amend at this juncture of the litigation.”); see also Vella v. Salaues , 290 So. 3d 946, 949 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (affirming denial of motion f or leave to amend complaint where “following two years of contentious litigation, on the proverbial ‘eve’ of the summary judgment hearing, immediately preceding the scheduled trial date, [plaintiff] sought to inject an entirely novel theory of prosecution into his lawsuit. Under these circumstances, the prejudice to the [defendants] is evident.”).

Accordingly, we grant the motion for rehearing of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit’s panel opinion issued prior to the transfer of jurisdiction of this appeal t o us, vacate that opinion, and substitute this opinion in its place affirming the final judgment entered by the county court in favor of

Allstate.

Affirmed.

G ROSS

, C IKLIN and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
VISION ACQUISITION III, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Berger, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ David BergerDavid
      BergerPrincipal
      Financial OfficerJanuary
      19, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       5,297,933
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               73,164,243
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,895,000
<INVENTORY>                                 75,639,717
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           153,243,245
<PP&E>                                      46,054,028
<DEPRECIATION>                              23,737,603
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             180,307,473
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       49,439,717
<BONDS>                                     59,441,222
<COMMON>                                       802,249
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  69,492,285
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               180,307,473
<SALES>                                    249,293,053
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           249,293,053
<CGS>                                      168,954,196
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              168,954,196
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (2,295,359)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,103,742
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,089,009
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             10,893,071
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,249,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,644,071
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,644,071
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .81
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Geospatial Corporation, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), for the year ended December 31,2 018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David M. Truitt, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   Date: January 6, 2020By/s/ David M. TruittName:David M. TruittTitle:Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board(Principal Executive Officer)
#### Henry W. Peabody and others Respondents, v. Emilio Cortado and others, Appellants.

— Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements of appeal, and the morion denied, with ten dollars costs. Opinion

*Ter Curiam.*
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of MidSouth Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 (the “Report”), I, C.R. Cloutier, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ C. R. Cloutier


C.R. Cloutier


Chief Executive Officer


May 10, 2010
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2962

EDWARD FRANCIS, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DAVID N. COOK,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-94-2490-3-17BD)

Submitted: March 29, 1996 Decided: April 16, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward Francis, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. John Robert Murphy, SWEENY,

WINGATE, MURPHY & BARROW, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Edward Francis, Sr., appeals from a jury verdict in his favor,

seeking a new trial in the hopes of winning increased damages. In

support of his appeal, he presents thirteen allegations of error

committed by the district court. These errors involve evidentiary

rulings and denials of continuances. Our review of the record reveals that Appellant has failed to establish that the district

court abused its discretion regarding any of these rulings or made

any other error entitling him to relief. See Superior Form Builders, Inc. v. Dan Chase Taxidermy Supply Co., 74 F.3d 488, 495 (4th

Cir. 1996); United States v. Bakker, 925 F.2d 728, 735 (4th Cir.

1991) (providing standards). Accordingly, we affirm the district

court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
---

Exhibit 4.17

Shenyang Sunshine Pharmaceutical Company Limited (hereinafter referred to as “Shenyang Sunshine”)

Company Address/Legal Address: No. 3 A1, Road 10, Shenyang Economy & Technology Development Zone

Dan Lou: Legal Representative of Shenyang Sunshine

Identity Card No: xxxxxx

Supplementary Agreement for Purchase Agreement for Acquisition of Equity Interest

Mr. Lou Dan is the shareholder of Liaoning Sunshine Pharmaceutical Company Limited (hereinafter “Liaoning Sunshine”) and holds 100% equity of Liaoning Sunshine. Shenyang Sunshine, Mr. Lou Dan, and Liaoning Sunshine signed a series of
relevant agreements for business cooperation and for specifying equity relationship (“previous relevant agreements”) in 2006 and 2007.

Now, Mr. Lou Dan and Shenyang Sunshine hope to make further clarifications and descriptions with regard to the following matters and signed the following agreement in Shenyang on February 3, 2010: 1. Shenyang Sunshine is entitled to appoint the
management of Liaoning Sunshine, including the general manager, financial director and other managers.

2. Shenyang Sunshine agrees to provide financial support for Liaoning Sunshine if necessary, including but not limited to bearing the operation losses of Liaoning Sunshine. Meanwhile, Shenyang Sunshine does not require Liaoning Sunshine to give
return for its loss bearing.

3. Shenyang Sunshine is entitled to unilaterally modify the proportion of payment from Liaoning Sunshine to Shenyang Sunshine regulated in the business cooperation agreement with Liaoning Sunshine (signed on January 1, 2007); 4. If Liaoning Sunshine
has to undergo the dissolution or transfer liquidation (“compulsory liquidation”) pursuant to the requirements of Chinese laws, Liaoning Sunshine shall sell all its assets at the minimum prices permitted in the Chinese laws to Shenyang
Sunshine or the other third party licensed by Shenyang Sunshine. The sales prices are paid by the investment funds for equity of Liaoning Sunshine (the investment funds are the payment in advance made by Shenyang Sunshine to Mr. Lou Dan); 5. After
the compulsory liquidation mentioned in the above 4, as the original shareholder of Liaoning Sunshine, Mr. Lou Dan shall return the excessive part (the payment in advance made by Shenyang Sunshine to Mr. Lou Dan is higher than the sales prices of
Liaoning Sunshine) to Shenyang Sunshine. If the direct return is not permitted by Chinese laws, Mr. Lou Dan shall return the same based on the modes permitted in Chinese laws.

6. The equity distribution (if any) related to Liaoning Sunshine made to Mr. Lou Dan in any form during any period shall be returned to Shenyang Sunshine in the form permitted by laws.

7. Any modification or change of previous relevant agreements shall be approved by Shenyang Sunshine in advance.

8. This Agreement came into effect from January 1, 2009.

---

Exhibit 4.17

If this Agreement is in conflict with the previous relevant
agreements, this Agreement shall prevail.



---
Notice Recipients

District/Off: 0971−3 User: dchambers Date Created: 2/19/2019

Case: 19−30088 Form ID: TRANSC Total: 5

Recipients of Notice of Electronic Filing:

aty Jane Kim jkim@kellerbenvenutti.com

aty Tobias S. Keller tkeller@kellerbenvenutti.com

TOTAL: 2

Recipients submitted to the Claims Agent (Prime Clerk):

aty Stephen Karotkin Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153

Gregory A. Bray, Esq.. Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP 2029 Century Park East, 33rd

Fl. Los Angeles, CA 90067

Peter J. Benvenutti, Esq. Keller & Benvenutti LLP 650 California Street, #1900 San Francisco, CA

94108

TOTAL: 3

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 450-3 Filed: 02/14/19 Entered: 02/14/19 17:21:46 Page 1

of 1
Signed and Filed: February 13, 2019

________________________________________

DENNIS MONTALI

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

Entered on Docket 

February 13, 2019

EDWARD J. EMMONS, CLERK 

U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 433 Filed: 02/13/19 Entered: 02/13/19 14:35:51 Page 1 of 2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 433 Filed: 02/13/19 Entered: 02/13/19 14:35:51 Page 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of 332 East 4th St. Associates, Respondent, v Carl Robertson, Also Known as Carl Milsap, Appellant, and Enobia Barnes et al., Respondents.

Submitted September 5,1995;

decided November 29, 1995

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction to entertain a motion for leave to appeal from the nonfinal order of the Appellate Division entered in a proceeding commenced in the Civil Court of the City of New York (NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b] [7]; CPLR 5602).