alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	News Release: SOUTHCOM Commander Meets with Senior Leaders at the Pentagon to Discuss Venezuela Crisis
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4619" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/DOD2/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint news">
    <div class="header">
        <img height="100" class="print-logo" alt="Site Logo" src="/Portals/7/Images/SOUTHCOM_logo_thumb.jpg?ver=SIvIeRRofyrg5ZHPpvvh6Q%3d%3d" />

        <h1 class="title">News Release: SOUTHCOM Commander Meets with Senior Leaders at the Pentagon to Discuss Venezuela Crisis</h1>
    </div>
    

    <div> <span class="date">/ Published May 3, 2019</span></div>
    <span class="dateline-text"></span>
    <p><strong>MIAMI</strong> – Yesterday the commander of U.S. Southern Command (SOUTHCOM) was asked by Acting Secretary of Defense, Patrick M. Shanahan, to remain in Washington D.C. to provide a current assessment on the situation in Venezuela and the status on planning for military options.</p>

<p>This morning, Adm. Craig S. Faller briefed key diplomatic and national security leadership, to include Secretary of State Mike R. Pompeo, Ambassador John R. Bolton, Gen. Joseph F. Dunford, White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney, Director of National Intelligence Dan R. Coats, and Undersecretary of Defense for Policy John C. Rood on a wide range of military options, as the command continues to monitor activities on the ground in Venezuela.</p>

<p>U.S. Southern Command stands with the people of Venezuela who are suffering at the hand of the illegitimate Maduro regime and remains prepared to support all options, when requested by senior leadership.</p>

<p>###</p>
<br />
</div>

    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 24, 2022. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, February 24, 2022 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A22D0242. CHRISTIAN GUY v. THE STATE. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 19SR210067
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed April 29, 2015.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D15-875

Lower Tribunal Nos. 06-1525, 06-18682

________________



### Edward T. Douglas

, Petitioner,

vs.



### The State of Florida

, Respondent.

A Case of Original Jurisdiction

– Mandamus.

Douglas T. Edwards, in proper person

.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General

, for respondent.

Before WELLS, ROTHENBERG and EMAS, JJ.

WELLS, Judge.

Douglas Edwards files this petition for writ of mandamus to compel the trial

court to rule on his pending postconviction motions filed under Florida Rules ofCriminal Procedure 3.800 and 3.850. Because the record below fails to

demonstrate that either his Rule 3.850 motion, dated July 29, 2009, or his Rule

3.800 motion, dated October 28, 2014, was ever filed below, we deny the petition

without prejudice to petitioner refiling these motions nunc pro tunc in the lower

court.

2
#### Mary Shaw, as Administratrix, etc., v. Charles L. Sheldon and others.

— Hew trial denied and judgment ordered for the plaintiff on the verdict. Opinion by

Smith, P. J.;

Haight, J., not sitting.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5351 

To waive the application fee for veterans with a service-connected disability 

rated at 50 percent or more who apply to participate in the Transportation Security Administration’s Pre✓TM program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 31, 2014 

Mr. LATTA (for himself and Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security, and in 

addition to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To waive the application fee for veterans with a serviceconnected disability rated at 50 percent or more who 

apply to participate in the Transportation Security Administration’s Pre✓TM program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Air Travel 

5 Streamlining Act of 2014’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5351 IH

1 SEC. 2. WAIVER OF APPLICATION FEE FOR VETERANS AP2 PLYING FOR TSA PRE✓TM. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subsection (b), the Ad4 ministrator of the Transportation Security Administration 

5 (TSA) shall waive the application fee for veterans with a 

6 service-connected disability rated at 50 percent or more 

7 who apply to participate in the TSA’s Pre✓TM program. 

8 (b) ESTABLISHMENT OF VERIFICATION SYSTEM.— 

9 Not later than six months after the date of the enactment 

10 of this Act, the Administrator of the TSA and the Sec11 retary of Veterans Affairs shall establish a system to 

12 verify whether a veteran’s disability is service-connected 

13 and such veteran’s disability rating for veterans who apply 

14 to participate in the TSA’s Pre✓TM program. 

15 (c) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this Act 

16 may be construed as in any way affecting the requirements 

17 for veterans described in this Act to otherwise meet the 

18 eligibility requirements for participation in the TSA’s 

19 Pre✓TM program. 

20 (d) DEFINITIONS.—The terms ‘‘veteran’’, ‘‘service21 connected’’, and ‘‘disability’’ have the meanings given such 

22 terms in section 101 of title 38, United States Code. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>



MIDSOUTH BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES                          EXHIBIT 11
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE  (Unaudited)
FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2004 AND 2003


                               Second Quarter   Second Quarter   Year-to-Date     Year-to-Date
                                 June 30,         June 30,         June 30,         June 30,
BASIC                              2004             2003             2004             2003
                               _____________    _____________    ____________     ____________
<S>                            <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>
Earnings:
    Income applicable to
      common stock              $1,745,367       $1,624,141       $3,406,315       $2,933,693
                               ===========      ===========      ===========      ===========
Shares:
    Weighted average number
      of common shares
      outstanding                3,190,830        3,179,256        3,187,575        3,179,256
                               ===========      ===========      ===========      ===========
Earnings per common share:
    Income applicable to
      common                         $0.55            $0.51            $1.07            $0.92
                               ===========      ===========      ===========      ===========

DILUTED

Earnings:
    Net income                  $1,745,367       $1,624,141       $3,406,315       $2,933,693
                               ===========      ===========      ===========      ===========
Weighted average number
    of common shares
    outstanding                  3,190,830        3,179,256        3,187,575        3,179,256

    Assuming exercise of
      options, reduced by
      the number of shares
      which could have
      been purchased with
      the proceeds from
      exercise of such options
      at the average issue
      price                        143,519          119,855          145,461          110,324
                                __________      ___________      ___________       __________
    Weighted average number
      of common shares
      outstanding, as adjusted   3,334,349        3,299,111        3,333,036        3,289,580
                                ==========      ===========      ===========       ==========

Fully diluted earnings per
    common share                     $0.52            $0.49            $1.02            $0.89
                                ==========      ===========      ===========       ==========




</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 108 (Monday, June 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32186-32187]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13514]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Task Force on Community Preventive Services

    Name: Task Force on Community Preventive Services meeting.
    Times and Dates: 8 a.m.-5:30 p.m. EST, June 16, 2010. 8 a.m.-1 p.m. 
EST, June, 17, 2010.
    Place: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2500 Century 
Center, Atlanta, GA 30329.
    Status: Open to the public, limited only by space available.
    Purpose: The mission of the Task Force is to develop and publish 
the Guide to Community Preventive Services (Community Guide), which is 
based on the best available scientific evidence and current expertise 
regarding essential public health and what works in the delivery of 
those services.
    Matters to be discussed: (1) Updates of prior reviews on the 
following topics: Reducing Vaccine-Preventable Diseases; Increasing 
Screening for Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer.
    (2) New reviews on: Immunization Information Systems; Collaborative 
Care for the Management of Depressive Disorders and Communication 
Campaigns with Product Distribution.
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.
    Contact person or additional information: Freda Parker, Community 
Guide Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton 
Road, M/S E-69, Atlanta, GA 30333, phone: 404.498.1119.


[[Page 32187]]


    Dated: May 28, 2010.
Tanja Popovic,
Associate Director for Science, Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2010-13514 Filed 6-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4840-4592-8620.1

Exhibit A

SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION BY PROFESSIONAL

FOR THE PERIOD MARCH 1, 2019 THROUGH AUGUST 31, 2019

Name Hours Rate Total Billed

Matthew Dundon 130.8 630 $ 79,884.00 

Laurence Pelosi 59.0 630 $ 37,170.00 

John Roussey 10.4 550 $ 5,720.00 

Alex Mazier 54.3 600 $ 30,180.00 

Total 254.5 $ 152,954.00 

See notes regarding certain discounts and reductions above.

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4727-1 Filed: 11/14/19 Entered: 11/14/19 14:32:47 Page 1

of 1
!"#$%!&'&$&&
%

(

$
)*+
,&


-.
	
,
/'&
'0&
)11',/'
'

2./)''/!	'
',3&//)
'')''

'
*4))/')''//*)%
,

$0/0
0'*//))
*,

''),3)1)
)//0&)

'
'/)1//0&),/)'/*'/*)

0&),&)''%'
,/5)&'


*/&/
%1,6/0/
&10,!"#$

/'))./0&
/&))'',!
*/')

')'
.*),

	
7




Case: 19-30088 Doc# 12961 Filed: 09/14/22 Entered: 09/15/22 11:13:24 Page 1

of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S.DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           3,044
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   83,192
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,919
<INVENTORY>                                     94,095
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               180,130
<PP&E>                                          66,044
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,204
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 228,879
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,171
<BONDS>                                         86,770
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           841
<OTHER-SE>                                      79,815
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   228,879
<SALES>                                        325,973
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               325,973
<CGS>                                          218,880
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  218,880
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,258)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,890
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,197
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,646
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,321
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,325
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,325
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.97
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0613

____________________________________________________________

JASON D. FRANKS,

Petitioner and Appellant,

v.

STATE OF MONTANA,

Respondent and Appellee.

ORDER 

Upon consideration of Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File 

Reply to Brief of Appellee, and good cause appearing;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time 

to and including March 24, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Reply to 

Brief of Appellee. No further extension will be granted.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 24 2022

02/24/2022

Case Number: DA 20-0613
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Tuesday, June 8, 2010 at 2 p.m.

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.

Commissioner Casey, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session.

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Tuesday, June 8, 2010 will be: Institution and settlement of injunctive actions; institution and settlement of administrative proceedings; an adjudicatory matter; and other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

                    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.                          ( print page 31823)    

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:

The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: June 1, 2010.

Elizabeth M. Murphy. 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-13503 Filed 6-2-10; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          25,759
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              25
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 8,200
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    132,408
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           1,848
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             1,856
<LOANS>                                        747,538
<ALLOWANCE>                                     12,765
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 928,517
<DEPOSITS>                                     718,991
<SHORT-TERM>                                    62,631
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,759
<LONG-TERM>                                     70,547
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,646
<OTHER-SE>                                      57,943
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 928,517
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 43,410
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,804
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   472
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                49,686
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              18,529
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,489
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           27,197
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,849
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               4,127
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 20,569
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,229
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      17,229
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,246
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.02
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.30
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,595
<LOANS-PAST>                                       147
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   183
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  3,359
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                11,172
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      989
<RECOVERIES>                                       733
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               12,765
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            10,864
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,901


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00459-CR

KEITH DEMONT MCCUIN APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 1139277D

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

Appellant Keith Demont McCuin attempts to appeal from the trial court’s 

order denying his request for appointed counsel to assist him in filing a 

postconviction motion for DNA testing.2

 On December 14, 2015, we sent 

 1

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2

One document that has been submitted to this court indicates that some 

biological material has already been tested. Appellant appears to challenge the 

qualifications of the person who completed the test.
2

appellant a letter informing him that we had received his notice of appeal and 

expressing our concern that we lack jurisdiction because there is no final 

judgment or order subject to appeal. Appellant has not responded to our letter.

A trial court’s denial of a request for appointed counsel to file a 

postconviction motion for DNA testing is not immediately appealable. Gutierrez 

v. State, 307 S.W.3d 318, 319 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010). “Such an appeal is 

premature; a motion for appointed counsel is a preliminary matter that precedes 

the initiation of Chapter 64 proceedings.” Id. at 323. Therefore, we dismiss this 

appeal because we do not have jurisdiction to consider appellant’s claim that the 

trial court erred by denying his request for appointed counsel. See id.; Anderson 

v. State, No. 02-14-00410-CR, 2015 WL 1407575, at *2 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 

Mar. 26, 2015, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication); see also Tex. 

R. App. P. 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: February 18, 2016

 

In the order denying appellant’s request for appointed counsel, the trial 

court found that there were “no reasonable grounds on which a motion [could] be 

filed under article 64.01 and therefore [denied] any request to appoint counsel.” 

See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 64.01(c) (West Supp. 2015).
Opinion issued October 20 , 2022

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 22
- 00703
- CV

——————————— IN RE GRAHAM W. GILLIAM , Relat or

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDU M OPINION Relator , Graham W. Gilliam, has filed a mandamus petition challenging the trial court’s September 27, 2022 Default Judgment for Non

- Contempt Enforcement Remedies and Order Granting Motion for Appointment of Receiver. 1 In conjunction with the petition, Rel ator filed a motion to stay the trial court’s order pending

1 The underlying case is Diane Werlein Gilliam v. Graham Wilson Gilliam , cause number 2022

- 43163 , pending in the 312th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Clinton E. Wells, Jr. presiding.2

resolution of the mandamus petition. We deny the petition and dismiss the stay motion as moot. PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Countiss, and Farris.