alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Henry Brettman v. Joseph Braun.

*Practice—Motion for New Trial—Trial by Court—Moldings of*Law— *Negligence—Burden qf Proof*

1. Where exception is duly taken to the finding and judgment of the court, in a case tried without a jury, a motion for a new trial is not necessary in order to permit the Appellate Court to pass on the sufficiency of the evidence,

2. In an action for damages caused by defendant's team while running away, the judge may properly refuse to hold that the owner of a team is not liable for damages caused by their running away through fright at something over which such owner had no control, unless he is shown to have been guilty of negligence, where he has held that the burden of proof is on plaintiff to show that the damage resulted from defendant’s negligence in the use or management of his team.

[Opinion filed June 2, 1890.]

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Abba H. Waterman, Judge, presiding.

Mr. William Nunn, for appellant.

Mr. J. H. Himes, for appellee.

*18Gary, P. J.

This case was tried by the court without a jury. The finding of the court and the judgment upon it, were excepted to by the appellant, but no motion was made for a new trial. The appellee insists that without such a motion the sufficiency of the evidence to warrant the finding can not be questioned. The law is the other way. The eases are reviewed in Hyde Park v. Cornell, 4 Ill. App. 602.

It is not really necessary that the court shall commit the same error more than once in the same case, to bring it before a court of appellate jurisdiction for review. Leyenberger v. Paul, 25 Ill. App. 480; Hubbard v. McCormick, 33 Ill. App. 486. The case is that the appellant, a farmer, hitched his team to a ring in a plank sidewalk, in the city of Chicago, without any examination as to the fastening of the plank; the horses got scared and ran away, taking the plank, six or eight feet long and as many inches wide, with them. He knew that the team had run away before in the country. There was a collision with the horse and wagon of the appellee and the amount of damage done is not in question. The appellant asked the court to hold as law: *“*The owner of a team of horses is not liable for damages caused by the running away of the same, by fright at something over which the owner of the team has no control, unless the owner is shown, by the evidence, to have been guilty of negligence at the time of the running away, in the use or management of the team;” which the court refused, but did hold : “ And that the burden of proof is on the plaintiff to show that the damage resulted from the negligence of the defendant in the use or management of his team.”

Without regard to the criticism that might be made on the first proposition, that the absence of negligence “ at the time of the running away ” does not exclude negligence in hitching the team insecurely, the second proposition covered the point of law of the first, and holding it once was enough.

On the facts, the finding of the court is final on a question of this kind. There is no error and the judgment is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
#### James F. Childs v. George C. Gordon.

Motion for reargument denied.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DIEMER & WEI, LLP

Kathryn S. Diemer (#133977)

100 West San Fernando Street, Suite 555

San Jose, CA 95113

Telephone: 408-971-6270 

Facsimile: 408-971-6271

Email: kdiemer@diemerwei.com 

WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER LLP

Matthew A. Feldman (pro hac vice)

Joseph G. Minias (pro hac vice)

Daniel I. Forman (pro hac vice)

787 Seventh Avenue

New York, NY 10019-6099

Telephone: (212) 728-8000

Facsimile: (212) 728-8111

Email: mfeldman@willkie.com

jminias@willkie.com

dforman@willkie.com

Counsel for Ad Hoc Group of Subrogation Claim Holders

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION,

-andPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, 

Debtors.

☐ Affects PG&E Corporation

☐ Affects Pacific Gas and Electric 

Company

 Affects both Debtors

* All papers shall be filed in the lead case,

No. 19-30088 (DM)

Chapter 11 

Bankr. Case No. 19-30088 (DM)

(Jointly Administered)

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF 

OBJECTION AND RESPONSE OF THE AD 

HOC GROUP OF SUBROGATION CLAIM 

HOLDERS TO THE MOTION OF THE AD 

HOC COMMITTEE OF SENIOR 

UNSECURED NOTEHOLDERS TO 

TERMINATE THE DEBTORS’ EXCLUSIVE 

PERIODS PURSUANT TO SECTION 

1121(d)(1) OF THE BANKRUPTCY CODE

Hearing Date and Time: August 13, 2019 at 9:30 a.m. 

(PT)

Hearing Location: 450 Golden Gate Ave., San Francisco, 

CA, Courtroom 17

Judge: Hon. Dennis Montali

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3432 Filed: 08/07/19 Entered: 08/07/19 15:57:02 Page 1 of

2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Ad Hoc Group of Subrogation Claim Holders hereby 

withdraws the Objection and Response of the Ad Hoc Group of Subrogation Claim Holders to the 

Motion of the Ad Hoc Committee of Senior Unsecured Noteholders to Terminate the Debtors’ 

Exclusive Periods Pursuant to Section 1121(d)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code (the “Objection”) 

[Docket No. 3062], which was filed on July 18, 2019, without prejudice to later seek relief 

requested in the Objection.

Dated: August 7, 2019

Counsel to Ad Hoc Group of Subrogation Claim Holders

WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER LLP

/s/ Matthew A. Feldman

Matthew A. Feldman (pro hac vice)

Joseph G. Minias (pro hac vice)

Daniel I. Forman (pro hac vice)

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3432 Filed: 08/07/19 Entered: 08/07/19 15:57:02 Page 2 of

2
# _

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21

- 0 588 JADA KU, Plaint iff and Appellant,

v. MONTANA HUMAN RIGHTS BUREAU, Defendant and Appellee. 

## SECOND ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMEN T

J. David Slov ak , th e mediator previously appo inted in this matter, has notified th e Court th at he declines th e appo int ment. Accor dingly, Mr. Slovak ’s order of m ediator ap point me ntis hereby rescinded and IT IS ORDERED THAT **J. BRIAN**  **BULGER ,**  whose name appears next on th e list of attorneys desiring appo int me nt as mediators fo r Money Judgments appeals which is m aintained p ursuant to M.R.App.P. , 7(4)(e), is hereby appo int ed to c onduct th e med iat io n process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that th e time periods set fo rth in M.R.App.P., 7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appoint me nt. A true co py of

thi s order is being mail ed to c ounsel of r eco rd fo r the parti es, or to th e parti es individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof. DATED thi s 16 th day

of December , 20 21

.

Bowen Greenwood , Clerk of the Supreme Court

c: Jada Ku, Michele L. Peterson

- Cook, J. David Slovak , J. Brian Bulger 12/16/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0588
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONI, Terrance J. Lillis, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D requiredto be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of PrincipalLife Income Fundings Trust 2007-1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report isincluded in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in thisreport under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement(s) in all material respects; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be includedin this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A. and Bankers Trust Company, N.A.Date: March 27, 2008   /s/ Terrance J. Lillis   Terrance J. Lillis  Chief Financial Officer- Retirement and Investor Services
#### BERTIE BAKER v. GEORGE R. WEST.

(Filed 21 October, 1925.)

Judgments — Motions—Findings—Appeal and Error.

Where judgment has been awarded in bastardy proceedings in conformity with O. S., 273, Laws of 1921, eh. 109, and upon defendant’s motion in tbe Superior Court tbe judge bas set tbe judgment aside upon sufficient evidence, tbe facts found accordingly are not reviewable on appeal to tbe Supreme Court.

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of *Grady, J.,*30 May, 1925, setting aside a verdict and judgment against tbe defendant. From CumberlaND.

*A. M. Moore for plaintiff.*

*E. 0. Robinson for defendant.*

Adams, J.

Tbe plaintiff caused a warrant to be issued charging tbe defendant with bastardy. Upon tbe trial before a justice of tbe peace judgment was rendered for' tbe plaintiff and tbe defendant appealed to tbe Superior Court. At tbe March Term, 1925, in tbe absence of tbe defendant tbe issue of paternity was answered in favor of tbe plaintiff; whereupon it was adjudged that tbe plaintiff recover of tbe defendant and bis surety tbe penal sum of tbe bond to be discharged upon payment to tbe plaintiff of $200 at stated times as tbe judgment provides. C. S., 273; Laws 1921, cb. 109. An execution against property was issued on this judgment and returned unsatisfied; and afterwards an execution against tbe defendant’s person under which be was arrested. Failing to secure bis release by *habeas corpus*tbe defendant made a motion to set aside tbe judgment against him and at tbe May term tbe motion was allowed, tbe judgment was vacated, and tbe cause was continued.

Tbe defendant’s motion was made for alleged inadvertence, surprise, and excusable neglect under C. S., 600. Tbe trial judge fully stated tbe facts in tbe judgment and found that tbe defendant bad not been negligent and that be bas a meritorious defense. There was evidence to support tbe judgment, and tbe findings of fact - under these circumstances are not reviewable in this Court. *Lumber Co. v. Blue,*170 N. C., 1; *Gaster v. Thomas,*188 N. C., 346.

Tbe judgment is

Affirmed.
#### First National Bank of Jersey City, Respondent, v. George W. Martin, Appellant, Impleaded, etc.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 108 (Monday, June 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 32182]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13542]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec. [thinsp]225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board 
has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and 
permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all 
bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information 
Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than June 22, 2010.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Ivan Hurwitz, Vice President) 
33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001:
    1. Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, Limited, Beijing, 
China; to acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of Strong City 
Securities, LLC, Newton, New Jersey, and thereby indirectly acquire 
voting shares of Fortis Securities LLC, New York, New York, and thereby 
engage in securities brokerage transactions, pursuant to section 225.28 
(b)(7)(i), and in riskless principal transactions, pursuant to section 
225.28(b)(7)(ii), both of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 2, 2010.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-13542 Filed 6-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

MIDSOUTH BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES                                             EXHIBIT 11
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE  (Unaudited)
FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2003 AND 2002


                                    Third Quarter     Third Quarter     Year-to-Date      Year-to-Date
                                    September 30,     September 30,     September 30,     September 30,
BASIC                                   2003              2002              2003              2002
                                    _____________     _____________     _____________     _____________

                                 <c>               <c>               <c>               <c>
Earnings:
    Income applicable to common
     stock                            $1,734,567        $1,241,673        $4,668,260        $3,147,049
                                    ============      ============      ============      ============
Shares:
    Weighted average number of
     common shares outstanding         3,173,579         3,171,456         3,174,972         3,171,456
                                    ============      ============      ============      ============

Earnings per common share:
    Income applicable to common
     stock                                 $0.55             $0.39             $1.47             $0.99
                                    ============      ============      ============      ============

DILUTED

Earnings:
    Net income                        $1,734,567        $1,241,673        $4,668,260        $3,147,049
                                    ============      ============      ============      ============

Weighted average number of
    common shares outstanding          3,173,579         3,171,456         3,174,972         3,171,456

    Assuming exercise of options,
     reduced by the number of
     shares which could have
     been purchased with the
     proceeds from exercise of
     such options at the
     average issue price                 151,924            70,302           128,834            67,316

    Assuming conversion of
     preferred stock at a
     conversion rate of 1 to
     2.998 shares                              -                 -                 -                 -
                                     ___________      ____________      ____________       ___________
    Weighted average number of
     common shares outstanding,
     as adjusted                       3,325,503         3,241,758         3,303,806         3,238,772
                                     ===========      ============      ============       ===========

Fully diluted earnings per common
    share                                  $0.52             $0.38             $1.41             $0.97
                                     ===========      ============      ============       ===========


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

                    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the                           ( print page 31800)                        provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.                

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis Panel; Fellowships and Dissertations.                    

*Date:*                         July 13, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Serena P. Chu, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Room 6154, MSC 9609, Bethesda, MD 20892-9609, 301-443-0004,                         *sechu@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 27, 2010.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-13413 Filed 6-3-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5090 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5090

To prohibit providing Federal funds for the National Endowment for the 
                                 Arts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 11, 2014

  Mr. Salmon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit providing Federal funds for the National Endowment for the 
                                 Arts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no Federal funds may be 
made available to the National Endowment for the Arts.
                                 <all>
```
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.

  Banc of America Funding Corporation
  Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,
  Series 2007-A

  I, Kelly Rentz, a Vice President of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (the "Master
  Servicer"), certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of the Banc of America Funding 2007-A Trust (the "Exchange
    Act Periodic Reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements
    were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
    report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports;

  4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
    servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
    conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
    this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
    in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the servicers have fulfilled
    their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material
    respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with the servicing
    criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
    reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
    asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
    accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
    13a-18 and 15d- 18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
    except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of
    noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this
    report on Form 10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Bank
    of America, National Association as Servicer, Countrywide Home Loans
    Servicing LP as Servicer, National City Mortgage Co. as Servicer and
    Washington Mutual Bank as Servicer.

    Dated:   March 27, 2008


    /s/ Kelly Rentz
    Signature

    Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master
    servicer)
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4516 Filed: 10/30/19 Entered: 10/30/19 08:06:07 Page 1 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4516 Filed: 10/30/19 Entered: 10/30/19 08:06:07 Page 2 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 4516 Filed: 10/30/19 Entered: 10/30/19 08:06:07 Page 3 of

3