alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT B

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3938-2 Filed: 09/19/19 Entered: 09/19/19 12:17:48 Page 1

of 2
EXHIBIT B

COMPENSATION BY WORK TASK CODE 

FOR THE PERIOD JUNE 1, 2019 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2019

Task Total Total

Code Hours Fees

3 Financial Analysis (Requested by Counsel, or Otherwise) 69,072.50 83.5 

4 13-Week Cash Flow / MOR / Liquidity Analysis 46.7 32,336.50 

5 Due Diligence of Debtor's Assets and Liabilities 163.0 117,565.00 

6 Due Diligence of Wildfire Safety Plan and Related Analysis 98.3 84,298.50 

7 Debtor Professionals - Diligence / Meetings / Calls 30.4 32,938.00 

8 UCC Professionals - Diligence / Meetings / Calls 9.0 8,305.00 

9 Other Professionals / Interested Parties - Diligence / Meetings / Calls 20.3 22,948.50 

10 Tort Claimants (Counsel/FA) - Diligence / Meetings / Calls 49.0 51,195.00 

11 Assist Counsel in Responses / Objections to Bankruptcy Court Motions 9.0 10,195.00 

12 Committee Related Matters - Diligence / Meetings / Calls 135.8 139,911.00 

13 Bankruptcy Filings and Document Review 122.5 81,407.50

14 Review of Executory Contracts and Related Analysis 7.8 5,731.00 

15 Review of Employee-Related Matters, Including Retention Plans 50.7 32,146.50 

16 Review of Claims and Related Analysis 14.7 13,536.50 

17 Asset Sale(s), Strategic Alternatives, and Related Analysis 11.3 9,903.50

20 Benchmarking and Related Analysis 2.6 1,267.00 

21 Term Sheets, Plan, and Disclosure Statement Analysis 199.4 144,613.00 

24 Travel Time - Non Working Travel 29.9 34,890.50 

25 Project Administration 37.6 31,095.00 

27 Time and Expenses Tracking - - 

29 Fee Application Preparation 48.3 32,588.50 

Subtotal 1,169.8 955,944.00

Less: 50% Discount for Non-Working Travel Time (17,445.25)

Grand Total 1,169.8 $ 938,498.75

Task Description

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3938-2 Filed: 09/19/19 Entered: 09/19/19 12:17:48 Page 2

of 2
EXHIBIT 35.1

                    SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)

                        RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC

                RALI SERIES 2007-QO1 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized officer of Residential Funding Company, LLC,
as servicer  (the  "Servicer")  pursuant to the Series  Supplement,  dated as of
January 1, 2007,  and the  Standard  Terms of Pooling and  Servicing  Agreement,
dated as of December 1, 2006 (as amended  from time to time,  the  "Agreement"),
among Residential Accredit Loans, Inc., as company, Residential Funding Company,
LLC, as master servicer,  and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas,  as trustee,
does hereby  certify that:

1. A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during  the  period  covered  by the
Issuing Entity's report on Form 10-K and of the Servicer's performance under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material  respects  throughout
such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 24th
day of March 2008.


By:   /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      Name:   Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:  Managing Director
Form TRANSC

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

Northern District of California

In re Debtor(s):

PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company

Case No.: 19−30088 DM 11

Chapter: 11

NOTICE OF FILING OF TRANSCRIPT

AND DEADLINES RELATED TO RESTRICTION AND REDACTION

A transcript of the proceeding held on February 13, 2019 was filed on February 14, 2019. The following deadlines

apply:

The parties have until Thursday, February 21, 2019 to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of

this transcript. The deadline for filing a request for redaction is Thursday, March 7, 2019.

If a request for redaction is filed, the redacted transcript is due Monday, March 18, 2019.

If no such notice is filed, the transcript may be made available for remote electronic access upon expiration of the

restriction period, which is Wednesday, May 15, 2019, unless extended by court order.

To review the transcript for redaction purposes, you may purchase a copy from the transcriber,

Jason Gottlieb

Attn: Jason Gottlieb, Dir. of Tran. Ops.

7227 N 16th St. #207

Phoenix, AZ 85020

or you may view the document at the clerk's office public terminal.

Dated: 2/21/19 For the Court:

Edward J. Emmons

Clerk of Court

United States Bankruptcy Court

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 450-1 Filed: 02/14/19 Entered: 02/14/19 17:21:46 Page 1

of 1
#### Willis H. Winn and Another, Respondents, v. Louis Jacobs, Appellant, Impleaded with Stephen Conway, Defendant.

Motion denied, with costs.

Present — Jenks, P. J., Hirsehberg, Burr, Thomas and Carr, JJ.
Certificate of Dissolution



 Exhibit 4.2 
 CERTIFICATE OF DISSOLUTION 
 OF 
 SOAPSTONE NETWORKS INC. 
 July 31, 2009 
 Soapstone Networks Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, 
 DOES HEREBY CERTIFY: 
 FIRST: That
dissolution was authorized by its board of directors on June 15, 2009 and by its stockholders on July 28, 2009. 
 SECOND: That
dissolution has been authorized by the board of directors and a majority of the stockholders of the corporation entitled to vote on a dissolution in accordance with the provisions of subsection (a) of Section 228 and subsection (b) of
Section 275 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. 
 THIRD: That the names and addresses of the directors and
officers of Corporation are as follows: 
  

					
	 Name
	  	 Address
	  	 Title

	William J. Leighton, Ph.D.	  	 Soapstone Networks Inc.
 One Federal Street
 Billerica, MA 01821
	  	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
			
	William J. Stuart	  	 Soapstone Networks Inc.
 One Federal Street
 Billerica, MA 01821
	  	Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President of Finance and Treasurer
			
	T.S. Ramesh	  	 Soapstone Networks Inc.
 One Federal Street
 Billerica, MA 01821
	  	Principal Accounting Officer and Vice President of Finance
			
	Michael J. Cayer	  	 Soapstone Networks Inc.
 One Federal Street
 Billerica, MA 01821
	  	Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
			
	William Ingram	  	 c/o Soapstone Networks Inc.
 One Federal
Street
 Billerica, MA 01821
	  	Director
			
	Richard T. Liebhaber	  	 c/o Soapstone Networks Inc.
 One Federal
Street
 Billerica, MA 01821
	  	Director









					
	 Name
	  	 Address
	  	 Title

	Robert P. Schechter	  	 c/o Soapstone Networks Inc.
 One Federal
Street
 Billerica, MA 01821
	  	Director

 FOURTH: This Certificate of Dissolution shall be effective upon its filing with the Delaware
Secretary of State. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of Dissolution of Soapstone Networks Inc. as of the
date first set forth above. 
  

			
	By:	 	 /s/ William J. Stuart

		 	William J. Stuart
		 	Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President of Finance, and Treasurer
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Unizan Financial Corp.s (the
Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James H. Nicholson, Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 5, 2005 |  | /s/ KIM M. TAYLOR      
|                     |  | Kim M. Taylor          
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3988    Filed: 09/24/19    Entered: 09/24/19 14:17:33    Page 1 of1
#### RAY ENGINEERING CO., Inc., Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 15220.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued June 17, 1965.

Decided June 25, 1965.

Robert M. Taylor, Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioner.

Solomon Leo Warhaftig, Dept, of Justice, Tax. Division, Washington, D. C., (Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Harry Baum, Attys., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for respondent.

Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER and STALEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The sole question before us is whether petitioner corporation and Branch Coal Corporation were an affiliated group of corporations with the privilege of making a consolidated return with respect to their income taxes for the taxable year in lieu of separate returns. A careful, competent argument is made on behalf of petitioner. This is based on the facts that the corporations operated as a business unit with the same executive officer who owns all of the stock in both corporations. However, the dispositive factor is that Section 1504 of the 1954 Code which defines an “affiliated group” leaves no room whatsoever for judicial construction as urged. The statute reads:

> “As used in this chapter, the term ‘affiliated group' means one or more chains of includible corporations connected through stock ownership with a common parent corporation which is an includible corporation j-j-_. * X

Under the facts petitioner and Branch Coal Corporation do not qualify as an “affiliated group” within Section 1504. The decision of the Tax Court will be affirmed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153-0119

SCHEDULE 

Environmental Agreements 

# Non-Debtor 

Counterparties Debtor Party 

Title of 

Environmental 

Agreement

Proposed 

Cure 

Amounts

Original 

Execution 

Date

1. Caselli, Dennis Pacific Gas and 

Electric Company 

Agreement for 

Environmental 

Investigation Activities 

$0 January 8, 

2018 

2. Caselli, Dennis Pacific Gas and 

Electric Company 

Addendum to 

Agreement for 

Environmental 

Investigation Activities 

$0 January 8, 

2018 

3. Caselli, Dennis Pacific Gas and 

Electric Company 

Lease $0 January 8, 

2018 

4. Caselli, Dennis Pacific Gas and 

Electric Company 

First Amendment to 

Lease 

$0 June 27, 

2018 

5. Caselli, Dennis Pacific Gas and 

Electric Company 

Second Amendment to 

Lease 

$0 January 3, 

2019 

6. Caselli, Dennis Pacific Gas and 

Electric Company 

Third Amendment to 

Lease 

$0 June 15, 

2019 

7. Dorrance, Sam 

and Dorrance, 

Catherine 

Pacific Gas and 

Electric Company 

Agreement for 

Environmental 

Remediation Activities 

$0 December 

22, 2017 

8. Dorrance, Sam 

and Dorrance, 

Catherine 

Pacific Gas and 

Electric Company 

First Amendment to 

Agreement for 

Environmental 

Remediation Activities 

$0 October 23, 

2018 

9. Dorrance, Sam 

and Dorrance, 

Catherine 

Pacific Gas and 

Electric Company;

PG&E 

Corporation 

Second Amendment to 

Agreement for 

Environmental 

Remediation Activities 

$0 July 23, 

2019 

10. Dorrance, Sam 

and Dorrance, 

Catherine 

Pacific Gas and 

Electric Company 

Lease $0 September 

21, 2017 

11. Dorrance, Sam 

and Dorrance, 

Catherine 

Pacific Gas and 

Electric Company 

Settlement Agreement, 

Release and Covenant 

Not to Sue 

$0 December 

28, 2017 

12. Dorrance, Sam 

and Dorrance, 

Catherine 

Pacific Gas and 

Electric Company 

Confirmatory 

Agreement 

$0 June 8, 2018

13. Hart, Laura Pacific Gas and 

Electric Company 

Agreement for 

Environmental 

Investigation Activities 

$0 October 9, 

2018 

14. Merchant, Minh 

and 

Merchant, 

Gurdon 

Pacific Gas and 

Electric Company 

Agreement for 

Environmental 

Investigation Activities 

$0 October 9, 

2018 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3897-1 Filed: 09/16/19 Entered: 09/16/19 16:31:11 Page 1

of 1
#### STATE v. WAYLAND WHITE, JR.

(Filed 20 September, 1950.)

1. Larceny § 7—

Evidence in tbis prosecution for larceny of certain pigs *held*sufficient to overrule defendant’s motion to nonsuit.

2. Criminal Law § 77c—

Where the charge as a whole is not contained in the record it will be presumed that the trial court correctly charged the jury, and an exception to an excerpt from the charge will not be sustained, even though it contained an apparent *lapsus linguae*which might have been harmful if not corrected in other portions of the charge.

Appeal by defendant from *Frizzelle, J.,*at April Term, 1950, of Chowan.

*386Criminal prosecution upon a bill of indictment containing two counts in wbicb defendant is charged with (1) larceny of nine hogs, the property of one Dewey Stallings, and (2) receiving said hogs knowing them to have been stolen.

Verdict: Guilty of larceny as charged in the bill of indictment.

Judgment: Confinement in the county jail for a period of two years to be assigned to work the public roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission.

Defendant appeals to Supreme Court and assigns error.

*Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorney-General Moody for the State.*

*Walter H. Oahey, Jr., for defendant, appellant.*

WinboeNE, J.

Though there are set out in the record, and discussed in the brief of defendant filed in this Court other assignments of error, the “question presented” on this as stated in said brief relates only to the action of the court in denying the motion of defendant for judgment as of nonsuit on the count charging larceny.

As to this, a reading of the record discloses sufficient evidence of facts and circumstances bearing thereon to take the ease to the jury, and to support a verdict of guilty so returned by the jury.

Moreover, the other assignments of error do not show error. While an excerpt from the charge of the court contains an apparent *lapsus linguce,*which, if not corrected, might have been harmful to defendant. However, the charge as a whole is not contained in the record. Hence, it will be presumed that the trial judge correctly charged the jury. *S. v. Jones,*182 N.C. 781, 108 S.E. 376; *S. v. Brooks,*225 N.C. 662, 36 S.E. 2d 238; *S. v. Wooten,*228 N.C. 628, 46 S.E. 2d 868.

In the judgment below, we find

No error.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2698 Filed: 06/20/19 Entered: 06/21/19 08:14:32 Page 1 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2698 Filed: 06/20/19 Entered: 06/21/19 08:14:32 Page 2 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2698 Filed: 06/20/19 Entered: 06/21/19 08:14:32 Page 3 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2698 Filed: 06/20/19 Entered: 06/21/19 08:14:32 Page 4 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2698 Filed: 06/20/19 Entered: 06/21/19 08:14:32 Page 5 of

5
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-2026

In re: JAMAR MARVIN SIMMONS, a/k/a Mar,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:13-cr-00061-GLR-1; 1:14-cv-03911-GLR)

Submitted: December 14, 2022 Decided: January 13, 2023

Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jamar Marvin Simmons, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-2026 Doc: 8 Filed: 01/13/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Jamar Marvin Simmons petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district 

court has unduly delayed acting on his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for relief from the 

court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. He seeks an order from this court 

directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the 

district court dismissed Simmons’ motion for lack of jurisdiction on December 13, 2022. 

Because the district court has recently decided Simmons’ case, we deny the mandamus 

petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-2026 Doc: 8 Filed: 01/13/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
The Honorable George Howard, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern 1

District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable H.

David Young, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 95-3582

___________

Adrian B. Tisdale, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United

States

* District Court for the 

Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas *

Eastern District of Arkansas.

Department of Correction, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: May 30, 1997

 Filed: June 4, 1997

___________

Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Adrian B. Tisdale, an Arkansas state prisoner,

appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. §

1

2254 petition. After carefully reviewing the record

before us and the parties’ briefs, we conclude the

judgment of the district court was correct and affirm for

the reasons stated in the district court’s opinion. See

8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH

CIRCUIT.
EXHIBIT 21.1

Subsidiaries of the Registrant

 

| Name of entity and place of jurisdiction                  |   | Voting SecuritiesOwned Percentage |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------|--------|
| PennantPark SBIC GP, LLC (Delaware)                       |   | 100                               | %      |
| PennantPark SBIC GP II, LLC (Delaware)                    |   | 100                               | %      |
| PennantPark SBIC LP (Delaware)                            |   | 100                               | % (1)  |
| PennantPark SBIC II LP (Delaware)                         |   | 100                               | % (2)  |
| PNNT Alabama Holdings Inc. (Delaware)                     |   | 100                               | % (3)  |
| PNNT Cascade Environmental Holdings, LLC (Delaware)       |   | 100                               | %      |
| PNNT CI (GALLS) Prime Investment Holdings, LLC (Delaware) |   | 100                               | %      |
| PNNT ecoserve, LLC (Delaware)                             |   | 100                               | %      |
| PNNT Investment Holdings, LLC (Delaware)                  |   | 100                               | %      |
| PNNT New Gulf Resources, LLC (Delaware)                   |   | 100                               | %      |
| PNNT Power Products Holdings, LLC (Delaware)              |   | 100                               | % (3)  |
| RAM Energy Holdings LLC (Delaware)                        |   | 100                               | % (4)  |
| Superior Digital Displays, LLC (Delaware)                 |   | 98                                | % (4)  |

 

| (1) | The entity is directly owned 99% by us and 1% by PennantPark SBIC GP, LLC which is effectively wholly-owned by us. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The entity is directly owned 99% by us and 1% by PennantPark SBIC GP II, LLC, which is effectively wholly-owned by us. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (3) | This entity is not operational. |
|-----|---------------------------------|

| (4) | This is a controlled affiliated investment. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------|
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the filing of China Crescent Enterprises, Inc.’s (the “Company”)
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of the undersigned,
in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, certify  pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1)
            
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:  August
19, 2009





/s/ Paul K.
Danner


Name:  Paul
K. Danner


Title:  Chief
Executive Officer





Dated:  August
19, 2009





/s/ Philip J.
Rauch


Name:  Philip
J. Rauch


Title:  Chief
Financial Officer
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T E UG E NI O E VE R AD O C AMAC HO CO N TRERA S, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 73303 A ge nc yN o. A 073- 982- 536 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r19, 2010 ** B e f o r e : O ’S C A N N L A I N , T A L L M A N , an dB E A , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . E uge ni o E ve r a do C am a c ho- C ontr e r a s , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oar d of

I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ ( “ B I A ” ) or de rde ny i ng hi s m ot i on t o r e ope n a l l e gi ng i ne f f e c t i ve a s s i s t anc e of

c ouns e l . W e have j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. R e vi e w i ng f orabus e of

di s c r e t i on, 

# FI LED

OC T 26 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 73303 2 I tu rr i b a rr i a v . I

NS , 321 F . 3d 889, 894 ( 9th C i r . 2003) , w e de nythe pe t i t i on f or r e v i e w. T he B I A di d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng C am a c ho- C ontr e r a s ’ m ot i on t o r e ope n be c aus e i tw a s f i l e d m or e than s i x y e ar s a f t e rthe B I A ’ s M ar c h 25, 2002, o r d e rd is m is s in g th e u n d e r ly in g ap p e a l, se e 8 C . F . R . § 1003. 2( c ) ( 2) , and C am a c hoC ontr e r a s f

a i l e d t o de m ons tr a t e tha the a c t e d w i th the due di l i ge nc e r e qui r e d f or e qu itab le to llin g , s e e I

tu rr ib a rr ia , 3 2 1 F .3 da t 8 9 7 ( e qu itab le to llin g av a ilab le

“ w hen a pet i t i on eri s pre vent ed fr om fi l i ng because of dec ept i on , fr aud, or error, as lo n g a s th e p e titio n e ra c ts w ith du e d ilig e n c e ” ) ; se e al so Si ng h v. G on zales , 491 F .3 d1 0 9 0 , 1 0 9 6 - 9 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 7 ) . C a m a c ho- C ontr e r a s ’ r e m a i ni ng c ont e nt i on i s unava i l i ng. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
#### James J. Flood, as Administrator, etc., Plaintiff, v. The Buffalo, New York and Philadelphia Railroad Company, Defendant.

Motion for a new trial denied, and judgment ordered for defendant upon the nonsuit.

Opinion by

Haight, J.
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2334    Filed: 06/03/19    Entered: 06/03/19 10:48:47    Page 1 of2

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2334    Filed: 06/03/19    Entered: 06/03/19 10:48:47    Page 2 of2