alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5117 

To make competitive awards to national estuary programs, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 15, 2014 

Mr. POSEY (for himself and Mr. MURPHY of Florida) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To make competitive awards to national estuary programs, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Estuary Urgent Needs 

5 Priority Program Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. COMPETITIVE AWARDS. 

7 Section 320(g) of the Federal Water Pollution Con8 trol Act (33 U.S.C. 1330(g)) is amended by adding at the 

9 end the following: 

10 ‘‘(4) COMPETITIVE AWARDS.— 


ebenthall on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5117 IH

1 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Of the amount made 

2 available under subsection (i), the Adminis3 trator shall make competitive awards under this 

4 paragraph. 

5 ‘‘(B) APPLICATION FOR AWARDS.—The 

6 Administrator shall solicit applications for 

7 awards under this paragraph from State, inter8 state, and regional water pollution control agen9 cies and entities, State coastal zone manage10 ment agencies, interstate agencies, other public 

11 or nonprofit private agencies, institutions, orga12 nizations, and individuals. 

13 ‘‘(C) SELECTION OF RECIPIENTS.—In se14 lecting award recipients under this paragraph, 

15 the Administrator shall select recipients that 

16 are best able to address urgent and challenging 

17 issues that threaten the economic and ecological 

18 well-being of coastal areas. Such issues shall in19 clude— 

20 ‘‘(i) extensive seagrass habitat losses 

21 resulting in significant impacts on fisheries 

22 and water quality; 

23 ‘‘(ii) recurring harmful algae blooms, 

24 unusual marine mammal mortalities; 


ebenthall on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5117 IH

1 ‘‘(iii) invasive exotic species which can 

2 threaten wastewater systems and cause 

3 other damage; or 

4 ‘‘(iv) jellyfish proliferation limiting 

5 community access to water during peak 

6 tourism seasons. 

7 ‘‘(D) PRIORITY.—The Administrator shall 

8 give priority for the competitive awards de9 scribed in subparagraph (A) to national estuary 

10 programs that are not part of the Geographic 

11 Programs as described in the explanatory state12 ment referred to in section 4 of the Consoli13 dated Appropriations Act, 2014 (Public Law 

14 113–76; 128 Stat. 7 and printed on page H978 

15 of the Congressional Record on January 15, 

16 2014). 

17 ‘‘(E) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIA18 TIONS.—From the amounts made available 

19 under subsection (i), 15 percent shall be made 

20 available for the competitive awards program 

21 under this subsection.’’. 

Æ 


ebenthall on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                        |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  /s/      Charif Souki                                                                                                 |
| Charif      Souki                                                                                                           |
| Chief      Executive Officer of Cheniere Energy Partners GP, LLC, the general partner      of Cheniere Energy Partners,L.P. |

----
DISMISS and Opinion Filed February 27, 2014 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01352-CV 

CHESTER CARR II AND ALL OCCUPANTS 

OF 1163 SOPHIA STREET, ALLEN, TEXAS 75013, Appellants 

V. 

JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Appellee 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 

Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 002-00510-2013 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Lang-Miers and Brown 

Opinion by Chief Justice Wright 

Before the Court is appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellee contends the 

appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Appellants did not file a response to 

appellee’s motion. 

In a letter dated December 31, 2013, the Court informed appellants that they had received 

notice from the Collin County Clerk that the clerk’s record had not been filed because they had 

not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee. We instructed appellants to file, within ten days, 

either written verification that appellants have paid or made arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee 

or written documentation that they have been found to be entitled to proceed without advance 

payment of costs. We cautioned appellants that if we did not receive the required documentation 

within the time specified the Court might dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). 
 –2– 

As of today’s date, appellants have not responded to our request for documentation 

regarding payment for the clerk’s record. Accordingly, we grant appellee’s motion and dismiss 

the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b) & 42.3(b). 

1313532F.P05 

 

/Carolyn Wright/ 

CAROLYN WRIGHT 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

CHESTER CARR II AND ALL 

OCCUPANTS OF 1163 SOPHIA STREET, 

ALLEN, TEXAS 75013, Appellants 

No. 05-13-01352-CV V. 

JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., 

Appellee 

 On Appeal from the County Court at 

Law No. 2, Collin County, Texas. 

Trial Court Cause No. 002-00510-2013. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. 

Justices Lang-Miers and Brown, 

participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. 

 It is ORDERED that appellee, JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., recover its costs of 

this appeal from appellants, CHESTER CARR II AND ALL OCCUPANTS OF 1163 SOPHIA 

STREET, ALLEN, TEXAS 75013. 

Judgment entered February 27, 2014 

/Carolyn Wright/ 

CAROLYN WRIGHT 

CHIEF JUSTICE
Exhibit 31.3
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, J. Duncan Smith, Treasurer of the Corporation, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of June 30, 2004 of First
Chester County Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)  Disclosed  in this  report  any  change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual  report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely  to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

August 13, 2004


/S/ J. Duncan Smith
-------------------
J. Duncan Smith
Treasurer

                                       34
#### Peter Ciancimino, Respondent, v. Dominick Bonacci, Appellant, Impleaded with Moses Vincelli.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion.

Jenks, P. J., Hirschberg, Burr, Woodward and Rich, JJ:, concurred.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-21-00039-CR

ASHLEE NICOHL JONES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from County Criminal 

Court No. 10 of Tarrant County (1584150)

May 20, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Brian Walker

 Justice Brian Walker
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3665 Filed: 08/22/19 Entered: 08/22/19 16:21:23 Page 1 of

2
/s/

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3665 Filed: 08/22/19 Entered: 08/22/19 16:21:23 Page 2 of

2
#### Frank Dawson, Respondent, v. Albert Wells by Guardian ad litem, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed. Opinion by

Haight, J.
No. 07-15-00163-CV

In the Interest of A.B., a Child §

§

§

§ From the County Court at Law No. 3

of Lubbock County

August 5, 2015

Opinion by Justice Hancock

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated August 5, 2015

, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis

, no costs beyond those that

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the filing of China Crescent Enterprises, Inc.’s (the “Company”) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:  May 20, 2011





/s/ James Jiang


Name:  James Jiang, PhD


Title:  Chief Executive Officer




Dated:  May 20, 2011





/s/ Philip J. Rauch


Name:  Philip J. Rauch


Title:  Chief Financial Officer
#### Christopher Meyer, Appellant, v. Thomas S. Blair and another, Respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs on opinion of Lawrence, J., in court below.
#### Wilber S. Peck and others, Respondents, v. George Rosenberg, Appellant.

— Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements
#### Princess E. L. LINGHAM-PRITCHARD, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

Nos. 435-6, Dockets 29476-7.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued May 5, 1965.

Decided June 7, 1965.

Princess Lingham-Pritchard, pro se.

Stephen H. Paley, Atty., Dept, of Justice, Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Jonathan S. Cohen, Attys., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before MOORE, SMITH and HAYS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Princess Lingham-Pritchard petitions for the review of decisions of the Tax Court, Raum, Judge (T. C. Memo 1964-185), confirming petitioner’s income tax deficiencies as assessed by the Commissioner for the years 1960 and 1962.

The Commissioner assessed deficiencies in petitioner’s income tax of $692.22 for 1960 and $655.32 for 1962. The 1960 deficiency arose from the disallowance of two claimed deductions: (1) Expenses incurred in commuting from her job as a substitute teacher in New York City schools and in maintaining a lodging in Philadelphia for weekend residence; (2) a worthless debt of $200 owed to the Princess by Mrs. Corley. The 1962 deficiency arose from the disallowance or reduction of four claims: (1) a reduction of a deduction for charitable contributions from $1,200 to $800; (2) a reduction for taxes paid from $1,700 to $192; (3) the disallowance of $635 in medical expenses; and (4) the reduction of a deduction for education expenses from $500 to $112.

*378The Tax Court upheld the Commissioner as to most of these deficiencies but allowed the Princess increased deductions in 1962 for medical expenses, charitable contributions and education expenses.

Under the circumstances, the Tax Court’s conclusions were reasonable and its efforts to approximate petitioner’s 1962 expenses were more than fair.'

Affirmed.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of MidSouth Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 (the “Report”), I, Teri S.
Stelly, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Teri
S. Stelly


________________________


Teri S.
Stelly


Interim
Chief Financial Officer


May 8,
2009
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

**WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATEANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

                I, H. John Berens, an authorized officer of Washington Mutual Bank (the “Servicer”), do hereby certify to WaMu AssetAcceptance Corp. (the “Depositor”), pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of January 1, 2007 (as amended, the “Servicing Agreement”) by and between the Depositor, the Servicer, LaSalle Bank NationalAssociation, as Trustee, and Christiana Bank & Trust Company, as Delaware Trustee the following with respect to WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2007-HY1 for the 2007 fiscal year  (the “Relevant Year”):

1.  A review of the activities of the Servicer during the Relevant Year and of performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.2.  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Relevant Year.

Dated as of March 1, 2008.

 

| /s/ H. John BerensName:  H. John Berens Title:    Senior Vice President |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2842 Filed: 07/02/19 Entered: 07/02/19 18:04:42 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2842 Filed: 07/02/19 Entered: 07/02/19 18:04:42 Page 2 of

2
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-2650

_____________________________

N.T.P.G., Mother of A.M.G., 

K.D.G., A.B.G., Jr., Minor 

Children,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND 

FAMILIES,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County.

Lacey Powell Clark, Judge.

February 27, 2024

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. N.S.H. v. Dep’t of Child. & Fam. Servs., 843 So. 2d 

898 (Fla. 2003) (approving procedure that includes dismissal 

when, after counsel withdraws, the appellant fails to timely file his 

or her own brief in support of appeal of termination of parental 

rights).

BILBREY, TANENBAUM, and LONG, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

N.T.P.G., pro se, Appellant.

Sarah J. Rumph, Children’s Legal Services, Tallahassee, for 

Appellee; Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, 

and Caitlin E. Burke, Senior Attorney, Statewide Guardian ad 

Litem Office, Tallahassee, for Guardian ad Litem.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5317 

To make the acquisition, installation, and maintenance of security cameras, 

safety lighting, and building locking mechanisms in public housing an 

eligible activity under community development block grant program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 31, 2014 

Mr. JEFFRIES (for himself and Mr. CAPUANO) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To make the acquisition, installation, and maintenance of 

security cameras, safety lighting, and building locking 

mechanisms in public housing an eligible activity under 

community development block grant program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘P.J.’s Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES. 

6 Section 105(a) of the Housing and Community De7 velopment Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5305(a)) is amended— 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5317 IH

1 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (16) through 

2 (28) as paragraphs (17) through (29), respectively; 

3 and 

4 (2) by inserting after paragraph (15) the fol5 lowing new paragraph: 

6 ‘‘(16) the acquisition, installation, and mainte7 nance of security cameras, safety lighting, and build8 ing locking mechanisms in public housing (as such 

9 term is defined in section 3(b)(1) of the United 

10 States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 

11 1437a(b)(1)));’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
|   | (1)  the Report      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

|   | (2)  the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/      Richard A. Robert         |
|--------|------------------------------------|
|   | Richard      A. Robert             |
|   |                               |
|   | Executive      Vice President and  |
|   | Chief      Financial Officer       |
|   | (Principal      Financial Officer) |
|   |                               |
|   | February      4, 2010              |
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-18-00124-CR

Ex parte Jeffery Pool §

§

§

§

§

From the 30th District Court

of Wichita County (187,799-A)

August 16, 2018

Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for 

want of jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

 Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
CERTIFICATION



The undersigned each certify that:

   1.  They are the duly appointed Chief Executive Officer and
       Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Northern Empire
       Bancshares, a California Corporation ("the Company");
       and

   2.  To his best knowledge and belief, the Company's Quarterly
       Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002,
       and to which the Certification is attached as Exhibit 1,
       fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or
       15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
       information contained in the Report fairly presents,
       in all material respects, the financial condition and
       results of operations of Northern Empire Bancshares.

Date:  August 8, 2002





/s/ James B. Keegan, Jr.                /s/ Patrick R. Gallaher
------------------------                ------------------------
James B. Keegan, Jr.                     Patrick R. Gallaher
Chief Executive Officer                 Chief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Exhibit D 

Cravath works with the Debtors in determining the appropriate staffing for all matters, and 

proactively seeks opportunities to leverage the Debtors’ in-house legal and business resources 

whenever it is reasonable and cost-effective to do so. Cravath avoids duplication of effort when 

handling Debtor matters. Cravath makes reasonable efforts to maintain continuity in its staffing and 

provides the Debtors with ample notification if any material changes to staffing are made. In these 

Chapter 11 Cases and the related regulatory, investigative, criminal and litigation matters, staffing 

needs are fluid, and Cravath periodically changes the composition of certain members of its team to 

provide adequate resources or avoid duplication. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3683-4 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 18:06:52 Page 1

of 1